Back to GetFilings.com






UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K


/x/

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000

OR

/ / TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                to                

Commission File Number 1-8885


THE NEWHALL LAND AND FARMING COMPANY
(a California Limited Partnership)
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

CALIFORNIA
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  95-3931727
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

23823 Valencia Boulevard, Valencia, California
(Address of principal executive offices)

 

91355
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code (661) 255-4000

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:

Title of each class
  Name of each exchange
on which registered

Depositary Receipts   New York Stock Exchange
Pacific Stock Exchange

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: None


    Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES /x/  NO / /

    Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. / /

    The aggregate market value of depositary receipts held by non-affiliates based upon the closing price of such depositary receipts on the New York Stock Exchange on February 28, 2001 was $585,437,073




THE NEWHALL LAND AND FARMING COMPANY
2000
FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
   
  Page
Number

PART I        
Item 1.   Business   1
Item 2.   Properties   6
Item 3.   Legal Proceedings   8
Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders   8

PART II

 

 

 

 
Item 5.   Market for the Registrant's Depositary Units and Related Security Holder Matters   8
Item 6.   Selected Financial Data   9
Item 7.   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations   11
Item 7A.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk   22
Item 8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data   23
Item 9.   Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure   44

PART III

 

 

 

 
Item 10.   Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant   45
Item 11.   Executive Compensation   52
Item 12.   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management   62
Item 13.   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions   64

Part IV

 

 

 

 
Item 14.   Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K   65
SIGNATURES   69
SCHEDULE III   Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation   71
INDEX TO EXHIBITS   74

PART I

Item 1. Business

INTRODUCTION

    The Newhall Land and Farming Company (a California Limited Partnership) (the "Company" or the "Partnership") is engaged in the development of residential, industrial and commercial real estate and in agriculture, on its approximately 50,000 acres in California. The interests in the Company (other than those held by the general partners) are represented by transferable Depositary Units listed on the New York and Pacific Stock Exchanges under the ticker symbol NHL (also referred to in this Annual Report as "partnership units"). The Company was reorganized from a corporation to a limited partnership on January 8, 1985. The predecessor corporation was established in 1883 by the family of Henry Mayo Newhall; the shares of the corporation were listed on the New York Stock Exchange in 1970.

    The Company's primary business is developing master-planned communities. Since 1965, the Company has been developing the town of Valencia on a portion of the Company's landholdings in Los Angeles County which now is home to approximately 42,000 residents and over 1,400 companies that provide 42,000 jobs. With approximately 6,700 acres remaining to be developed, and residential buildout expected by 2005, Valencia is the regional center for north Los Angeles County and the northern gateway to the entire Los Angeles metropolitan area.

    In 1994, the Company started the entitlement process on Newhall Ranch, a new master-planned community located on 12,000 acres adjacent to Valencia and west of Interstate 5. In March 1999, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors gave final approval for the project. The Newhall Ranch Specific Plan permits 21,600 homes in five villages and 325 net acres of commercial and business park uses. Planning and design work has started on the infrastructure for the project and detailed planning is proceeding on two of the five villages planned for the community. In June 2000, six issues in the project's Environmental Impact Report were identified by a Kern County Superior Court judge as needing additional environmental review. For additional information on these issues, please refer to the "Community Development" section under Part II. Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

    Valencia and Newhall Ranch are located on the Company's prime landholding consisting of over 19,000 contiguous acres in north Los Angeles County, the fastest growing region in California. The development potential of these properties is unmatched in the entire County and is directly in the path of growth along the Interstate 5 corridor, just 30 miles north of downtown Los Angeles. Four major freeways intersect Interstate 5 within ten minutes of Valencia providing businesses and residents easy access to the Los Angeles metropolitan area, major airports and the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach.

    In the late 1980s, the Company adopted the strategy of selling farm properties with little or no potential for development and re-deploying the proceeds into real estate operations. As of December 31, 2000, more than 70,000 acres of non-strategic farmland have been sold. The Company's remaining agricultural properties are the New Columbia Ranch in the San Joaquin Valley and the Newhall Orchard in Ventura County.

    In September 1999, the Company initiated a strategy to repurchase up to 20%, or 6,384,446 units, of its outstanding partnership units. This represented a significant shift in business strategy and afforded the Company a major arbitrage opportunity to capitalize on the gap in its underlying asset value relative to the market price of the Company's units.

    The Company's strategy to accomplish the unit repurchases involved the sale of approximately one-half of the Company's income portfolio and the suspension of capital spending for new income

1


portfolio additions. In 2000, two retail properties, four apartment complexes and four office buildings were sold and, as of December 31, 2000, a total of 4,899,502 units had been repurchased of which 3,175,550 units were repurchased in 2000. For additional information about income properties sold and unit repurchases, please refer to the sections titled "Results of Operations," "Income Property Sales" and "Liquidity and Capital Resources" under Part II. Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

    Financial information concerning the Company's business segments appears in Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report. Information regarding competition and compliance with governmental and environmental regulations appears in the Inflation, Risks and Related Factors section of Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this Annual Report. At December 31, 2000, the Company had 195 employees.

Competition

    The sale and leasing of residential, industrial and commercial real estate is highly competitive, with competition coming from numerous and varied sources. The degree of competition is affected by such factors as the supply of real estate available which is comparable to that sold and leased by the Company and the level of demand for such real estate. Valencia experienced a slight decrease in its new home sale market share at both the local and the county level in 2000, due to the temporary decline in new home inventory. There is no assurance that this new home sales decline will reverse in the future even with an increasing supply of new homes in Valencia given competing projects in the region. This could impact the pace at which the Company is able to sell additional residential land.

Appraisal of Real Property Assets

    The independent appraisal firm of Buss-Shelger Associates appraised the market value of the Company's real property assets to be $991 million at December 31, 2000. The appraised properties did not include oil and gas assets, water supply systems, cash and cash equivalents and certain other assets. The net appraised value of the Company's total assets, including assets not independently appraised, was $922 million, after reduction for debt and certain other liabilities as shown in the table below.

    For the purpose of the appraisals, market value was defined as the most probable price in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. A significant portion of the appraised real property assets is located on the Company's 19,000 acres, 30 miles north of downtown Los Angeles and currently is undeveloped.

    Entitlements and the continuing development of Valencia enhance the appraised value of the Company's land assets. Although raw land increases in value as development opportunities arise, the most significant increases occur when necessary land use entitlements, including zoning and mapping approvals, are obtained from city and county governments. The appraised values of the Company's land and income-producing properties in the Valencia master-planned community have increased from $222 million in 1984, the first year independent property appraisals were obtained, to $740 million in 2000. On a per unit basis, the Company's net appraised value has increased from $11.74 to $34.66 over the same 17-year period.

    In 1999, Newhall Land initiated an aggressive unit repurchase program to capitalize on the investment opportunity to create unitholder value based upon the difference in the record-high underlying asset values relative to Newhall Land's unit price. Consequently, the 2000 results reflect the removal of $86.5 million in asset value for repurchases and $21.2 million in distributions. To fund these unit repurchases in 2000, the Company sold $78 million in Valencia land and $220 million of income-producing properties. A portion of sales proceeds was used to reduce mortgage and other debt. This activity was more than offset by a 10% reduction in units outstanding, resulting in a 6% increase in net

2


appraised value on a per unit basis for 2000. Declines in Valencia area properties presented below for 2000 are the result of this significant sales activity. Absent these sales, remaining Valencia land values and income-producing properties increased in value by 12% and 4%, respectively.

    A summary of year-end appraised values follows (the appraisals were performed by independent appraisers except as noted):

Appraised Values

 
  2000
  1999
  1998
  1997
  1996
 
$ in millions, except per unit

  Acres
  Amount
  Percent
Change

  Amount
  Percent
Change

  Amount
  Percent
Change

  Amount
  Percent
Change

  Amount
  Percent
Change

 
Valencia and nearby properties   6,670   $ 418   (2 )% $ 428   (6 )% $ 454   8 % $ 420   % $ 420   (7 )%
Income-producing real estate   735     322   (31 )   465   7     435   2     425   14     372   16  
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Valencia area properties   7,405     740   (17 )   893   0     889   5     845   7     792   3  
Community development properties:                                                        
  Newhall Ranch, City Ranch (50.1% interest)*, McDowell Mountain Ranch* and Broomfield, CO   11,965     187   3     181   66     109   76     62   41     44   (29 )
Agricultural properties   30,110     59       59   (34 )   90   5     86   (2 )   88   3  
Mortgage and other debt at book carrying value         (75 ) (66 )   (223 ) 41     (158 ) 1     (157 ) (4 )   (163 ) 7  
All other, net, not independently appraised         11   (83 )   64   56     41   14     36   (27 )   49   (20 )
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net appraised value   49,480   $ 922   (5 )% $ 974   0 % $ 971   11 % $ 872   8 % $ 810   (3 )%
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of partnership units outstanding (000's )         26,590   (10 )%   29,668   (9 )%   32,676   (5 )   34,527   %   34,701   (3 )%
       
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net appraised value per partnership unit       $ 34.66   6 % $ 32.85   11 % $ 29.72   18 % $ 25.25   8 % $ 23.35   —%  
       
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

*
The Company's 50.1% interest in City Ranch was divested in 2000 and McDowell Mountain Ranch in Scottsdale, Arizona, was sold in 1996.

    Appraised values are judgments. Land and property appraisals are an estimated value based on the sale of comparably located and zoned real estate or on the present value of income anticipated from commercial properties. There is no assurance that the appraised value of property would be received if any of the assets were sold. No assumptions have been made with respect to the bulk sale of the Company's total real estate assets. Certain reclassifications within categories have been made to conform to the current year presentation; however, prior period amounts have not been restated to reflect land sale activity, unit repurchases or distributions to unitholders. For the five-year period ended 2000, the Company has invested $237.4 million in unit repurchases and paid out $89.5 million in distributions.

REAL ESTATE

    The Company's primary business is developing new towns and master-planned communities in north Los Angeles County. This includes the town of Valencia, 30 miles north of Los Angeles and Newhall Ranch, a new community planned for over 21,000 homes on 12,000 acres adjacent to Valencia, just west of Interstate 5.

    Valencia, the first master-planned community developed by the Company, has experienced tremendous success and set the standard for the Company's other planned communities. Today, Valencia is a balanced community, providing residential, commercial and retail properties, along with

3


industrial and recreational facilities and is the regional center for north Los Angeles County. Residents are attracted to the quality of life offered in Valencia's safe, clean environment, combined with award-winning schools. Major business such as Princess Cruises and Explorer Insurance, have relocated to Valencia for these same reasons plus the added benefit of a strong local labor pool and proximity to the Los Angeles metropolitan area. Approximately 6,700 acres including over 7,300 homes and apartments remain to be developed in Valencia. The Company's goal is to complete the sellout of Valencia residential land by 2005.

    Newhall Ranch, the next major master-planned community planned for the Company's 12,000 acres west of Interstate 5 and adjacent to Valencia, is based on a master plan that incorporates the natural beauty of the Santa Clara River and preserves over 6,000 acres of open space. Approval of this 21,600 home project was received in 1999 from the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors. The first two villages, Riverwood and The Mesas, are in the planning stages, along with design work on the major infrastructure to open the project.

    For information regarding lawsuits pertaining to the Company's residential projects, please refer to the section entitled "Community Development" under Part II. Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

    In 2000, the Company divested its 50.1% interest in a joint venture with Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc. to develop a 1,900-acre parcel in Palmdale, 30 miles northeast of Valencia in the Antelope Valley. The Company is in discussions with potential buyers interested in acquiring the Company's option on 1,800 acres for a new community in Broomfield, Colorado, located between Denver and Boulder.

    The Company sells residential lots to merchant builders, operates a portfolio of commercial properties, provides building-ready sites for sale to industrial and commercial developers/users and owns a public water utility. For additional information regarding the Company's business refer to "Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in this Annual Report.

Residential Development and Land Sales

    In 2000, merchant builders in Valencia sold 419 new homes on land previously sold by the Company, an increase of 18%, compared to the 355 new homes sold in the prior year by merchant builders and the Company's joint ventures. Despite the increase, home sales were well below the level expected in 2000 due to builders being slow to bring product to market, an over abundance of higher priced product on the market and general softening in market conditions. At December 31, 2000, there were 186 new homes in escrow, well above the 99 homes in escrow at the end of 1999. Merchant builders had an inventory of 931 lots remaining on which to build new homes at December 31, 2000. While the Company does not participate directly in profits generated from escrow closings by merchant builders, the absorption of these previously sold lots is key to the Company's future success in selling additional lots.

    A total of 208 residential lots closed escrow by the Company in 2000. Lot sales in 2000 were impacted by the Public Utilities Commission's (PUC) decision to combine its review of Valencia Water Company's request to expand its service area together with the water company's water management plan. The PUC requested environmental studies be submitted on water availability for the projects included in the service expansion area. The water company is in the process of providing the PUC the necessary information. Valencia Water Company expects the PUC will render its decision in the 2001 third quarter. A total of 4,445 residential lots and apartment units are affected. The total number includes 1,900 lots and apartments that the City of Santa Clarita annexed in December 2000, and 2,545 lots and apartments in the Company's West Creek community approved in December by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors.

4


    The Company's goal is to double the historical pace of development and achieve new home sales of approximately 1,200 annually by capturing a greater share of the Santa Clarita Valley housing market. The continued fundamentals of low housing supply and high demand, as predicted by economists, will fuel an estimated annual demand for 25,000 new homes in Los Angeles County, compared to an annual average of about 12,000 homes over the past decade.

Industrial/Commercial Development and Land Sales

    The Company develops the infrastructure and provides sites for sale to industrial/commercial developers and users. Valencia's location just 30 miles from downtown Los Angeles on Interstate 5, California's major north-south freeway, provides an attractive environment for industrial, commercial, service, distribution and entertainment businesses. Valencia now is the regional center for north Los Angeles County and boasts a 1:1 jobs-to-housing ratio. Businesses continue to be attracted to the advantages Valencia has to offer including easy freeway access, a safe and clean work environment and a highly skilled local workforce.

    The Company markets industrial and commercial land as Valencia Gateway which encompasses 4,500 acres and has 15 million square feet of building space today, making it the largest master-planned center for business, technology and industry in Los Angeles County. The Company plans to aggressively market Valencia Gateway and targets an annual absorption of 50 to 75 acres per year, which accommodates about one million square feet of new development. The Company also plans to explore opportunities to create strategic partnerships with large-scale developers to accelerate cash flow and minimize capital requirements within its business parks. In 2000, the Company sold 59 acres of industrial land and 50 acres of commercial land.

Community Development

    The Company continues to invest heavily in land use entitlements to support accelerated growth and to maximize the value of its landholdings. The Company's community development activities are focused on securing the necessary governmental land use approvals as well as community planning and marketing to complete the projected sellout of Valencia residential land by 2005 and begin development of Newhall Ranch in 2003. Planning and design work has started on the infrastructure for the 21,600-home Newhall Ranch project and detailed planning is proceeding on two of the five villages planned for the community.

Commercial Real Estate Development

    As previously discussed, in 2000, the Company sold several income properties to finance the repurchase of up to 6.3 million partnership units. For additional information about the properties sold and the repurchase plan, see the sections entitled "Income Producing Properties" and "Liquidity and Capital Resources" under Part II. Item 7.—"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations".

    For additional information about the Company's remaining commercial properties at December 31, 2000, see Part I. Item 2—"Properties" and Schedule III—Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation. To conserve capital and accelerate the cash flow, the Company does not plan to develop new income properties in 2001 and instead is marketing retail sites to third-party developers.

Valencia Water Company

    Valencia Water Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary that supplies water to Valencia and other adjacent developments, is a regulated public utility serving over 22,000 metered customers. The water supply for the service area is obtained from wells owned by Valencia Water Company and by purchases

5


from the California State Water Project. In 2000, 52% of Valencia Water Company's water was supplied through ground sources.

AGRICULTURE

    The Company's agricultural division consists of farming and energy operations. The principal remaining agricultural properties are New Columbia Ranch in the San Joaquin Valley and the Newhall Orchard in Ventura County on which the Company and its tenants raised over 20 different crops during the calendar year 2000. Of the Company's land devoted to farming, over 67% was leased to others in 2000. Approximately 21,000 acres of land at the Newhall Ranch and Newhall Orchard not suitable for cultivation or ready for development are leased to third parties for cattle grazing.

    The Company's agricultural operations supply most of their water through underground sources and are not dependent on state or federal water projects. The Company continues to improve conservation practices to minimize the cost of irrigation and the amount of water used.

    Energy operations consist of royalty interests in oil and gas assets on the Newhall Ranch. The Company's 50% mineral interest at the Meridian Ranch, which was sold in 1994, ended on June 30, 2000. In total, the Company has royalty interests in approximately 150 oil wells and 16 gas wells. Energy operations do not represent a material source of revenues and income for the Company.

Item 2. Properties

Land

    Listed below are the location and acreage of properties owned by the Company at December 31, 2000:

Property
  State
  County
  Acreage
Valencia area   California   Los Angeles   7,405
Newhall Ranch   California   Los Angeles   11,965
Newhall Orchard   California   Ventura   16,110
New Columbia   California   Madera   14,000
           
            49,480
           

Plants and buildings

    Agriculture—Various buildings located at two farming operations in California.

6


    Commercial Real Estate—Listed below are square footage, occupancy, net operating income by group and anchor tenants of major commercial properties owned by the Company at December 31, 2000. The Company also has numerous land leases including 541 acres for a landfill. The commercial properties are leased to 225 tenants.

 
  Year
Opened

  Approximate
GLA(1) in
Square Feet

  2000 Net
Operating
Income

  12/31/00
Occupancy(2)

  Major Tenants
Dollars in thousands

   
   
  (in 000's)

   
   
Shopping Centers

   
   
   
   
   
Valencia Town Center   1992   675,000          99%   Robinsons-May, JC Penney, Sears
Valencia Town Center Drive   1998   54,000          97%   Ann Taylor, Nine West, Zany Brainy, Talbot's, Brookstone
Valencia Entertainment Center   1999   130,000             IMAX / Edwards Theaters
River Oaks   1987   272,000         100%   Mervyn's, Target
NorthPark Village Square   1996   81,800         100%   Ralphs Supermarket, Rite Aid
Other   various   37,600              
       
 
       
        1,257,805   $ 15,393        
       
 
       
Office

   
   
   
   
   
City Center   1991   44,800     668   100%   Bank of America
       
 
       
Land Leases/Mixed Use/Other

   
   
   
   
   
Spectrum Health Club   1997   53,500         100%    
Town Center Plaza   1999   26,000         100%    
Other Income Properties   various   95,600              
       
 
       
        175,100     5,766        
       
 
       
Hotels

   
  Rooms
   
   
   
Valencia Hilton Garden Inn (75% joint venture interest)   1991   152              
Hyatt Valencia Hotel and Santa Clarita Conference Center(3)   1998   244              
       
 
       
        396     2,981        
       
 
       
Total           $ 24,808        
           
       

(1)
Gross Leaseable Area

(2)
Including leases signed and not open

(3)
Santa Clarita Conference Center totals 26,000 square feet

    All of the commercial real estate properties and the properties of Valencia Water Company are located in and around Valencia, California. At December 31, 2000, two of the shopping centers secured loans with a $24.5 million principal balance and borrowings totaling $12 million were outstanding against a $50 million revolving mortgage facility secured by Valencia Town Center. An $11 million

7


financing is secured by the water utility plant of Valencia Water Company. For additional information concerning encumbrances against Company properties, refer to Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements section.

    For additional information on the Company's properties, refer to the summary of appraised values on page 3 and Schedule III—Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation on pages 71 and 72.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

    The Company, including its subsidiary, are named defendants in many lawsuits arising from the ordinary course of its business. While the outcome of these lawsuits cannot be predicted, management does not expect these matters to have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations.

    For information on lawsuits pertaining to Newhall Ranch, Valencia Westridge and the West Creek community, please refer to the section entitled "Community Development" under Part II. Item 7.—"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations".

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

    None.

Part II

Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Depositary Units and Related Security Holder Matters

Market Price and Distribution Data

Years ended December 31

 
  Market Price
   
   
   
 
  2000
  1999
   
  Distributions
Per unit

  High
  Low
  High
  Low
   
  2000
  1999
First quarter   $ 28.50   $ 26.75   $ 26   $ 223/4   First quarter   $ .45   $ .32
Second quarter     28.88     26.38     28     221/2   Second quarter     .10     .10
Third quarter     28.88     23.25     26     223/16   Third quarter     .10     .10
Fourth quarter     24.50     20.20     27     233/8   Fourth quarter     .10     .10
   
 
 
 
     
 
Year's high and low   $ 28.88   $ 20.20   $ 28   $ 223/16   Total distributions   $ .75   $ .62
   
 
 
 
     
 

 


 

2000

 

1999


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 

December 31, closing price   $ 23.25   $ 27                            
   
 
                           

    The Company's Depositary Units are traded on the New York and Pacific Stock Exchanges under the ticker symbol NHL and, at December 31, 2000, the Company had 1,144 unitholders of record. The Company has paid uninterrupted quarterly cash distributions since 1936. The declaration of any distribution and the amount declared is determined by the Board of Directors taking into account the Company's earnings, cash requirements, financial condition and prospects.

8


Item 6. Selected Financial Data

 
  2000
  1999
  1998
  1997
 
In thousands, except per unit, percentages and sales information                          
Operating Results                          
  Revenues   $ 400,968   $ 322,506   $ 304,678   $ 207,701  
  Operating income     117,973     115,213     83,894     63,898  
  General and administrative expense     (14,642 )   (14,431 )   (12,634 )   (10,268 )
  Interest and other, net     (17,935 )   (10,390 )   (7,180 )   (9,137 )
  Net income     85,396     90,392     64,080     44,493  
  Depreciation and amortization (included in net income)     (13,800 )   (15,296 )   (10,101 )   (10,148 )

Per Unit Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Net income   $ 3.09   $ 2.88   $ 1.89   $ 1.29  
  Net income—assuming dilution     3.05     2.85     1.86     1.28  
  Distributions (including special)     .75     .62     .52     .48  
  Partners' capital     4.48     4.71     4.40     4.21  
  Appraised value     34.66     32.85     29.72     25.25  
  Market price—high
    28.88     28     343/4     32  
                            low
    20.20     223/16     201/4     161/2  
                            year-end closing
    23.25     27     26     30  

Financial Position

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Land under development   $ 63,155   $ 39,401   $ 47,667   $ 53,875  
  Income-producing properties, net     160,505 (2)   281,060 (2)   248,712     227,203  
  Total assets     351,708     504,824     432,207     403,932  
  Mortgage and other debt (total debt)     74,557     222,825     157,609     156,946  
  Other long-term obligations     57,611     50,474     48,832     40,393  
  Total liabilities     232,504     365,099     288,394     258,655  
  Partners' capital (capital)     119,204     139,725     143,813     145,277  
  Market capitalization at year end     618,218     801,036     849,576     1,035,810  

Statistics

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Return on total debt and capital     44 %   25 %   21 %   15 %
  Total debt as a percent of total debt and capital     38 %   61 %   52 %   52 %
  Total debt as a percent of total market capitalization     11 %   22 %   16 %   13 %
  Units outstanding—weighted average     27,658     31,388     33,986     34,520  
                         —weighted average—diluted     27,969     31,668     34,376     34,750  
                         —year end     26,590     29,668     32,676     34,527  

Sales Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Residential lots and homes sold     208     1,060     1,232     888  
  Industrial and commercial acres sold     108.5     120.6     125.0     81.0  
  Farm acres sold         39,142     970     1,673  

(1)
Includes lots sold at McDowell Mountain Ranch in Arizona prior to the sale of the project in 1996.

(2)
Includes income-producing properties held for sale, net

9


 
  1996
  1995
  1994
  1993
  1992
  1991
  1990
 
In thousands, except per unit, percentages and sales information                                            
Operating Results                                            
  Revenues   $ 220,186   $ 175,597   $ 134,268   $ 105,452   $ 128,182   $ 150,762   $ 192,886  
  Operating income     60,584     46,482     34,607     28,538     31,636     43,232     48,487  
  General and administrative expense     (9,133 )   (8,547 )   (8,578 )   (7,710 )   (6,806 )   (8,749 )   (5,381 )
  Interest and other, net     (9,562 )   (10,618 )   (10,455 )   (8,031 )   (7,619 )   (4,398 )   (4,728 )
  Net income     41,889     27,317     15,574     12,797     17,211     30,085     38,378  
  Depreciation and amortization (included in net income)     (8,857 )   (7,698 )   (7,690 )   (7,329 )   (6,471 )   (7,701 )   (8,441 )

Per Unit Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Net income   $ 1.19   $ .75   $ .42   $ .35   $ .47   $ .82   $ 1.03  
  Net income—assuming dilution     1.18     .75     .42     .35     .47     .82     1.02  
  Distributions (including special)     .40     .40     .40     .40     .60     .80     .80  
  Partners' capital     3.48     3.14     3.06     3.03     3.08     3.20     3.18  
  Appraised value     23.35     23.32     21.86     21.04     22.01     23.70     25.33  
  Market price—high     183/4     17     171/4     171/2     203/8     221/2     321/2  
                          low     15     121/8     12     131/2     12     131/2     147/8  
                          year-end closing     167/8     17     121/8     16     141/4     191/4     16  

Financial Position

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Land under development   $ 63,266   $ 88,457   $ 87,423   $ 73,078   $ 50,127   $ 67,769   $ 73,527  
  Income-producing properties, net     182,641     134,504     135,858     134,384     161,615     116,875     91,783  
  Total assets     373,488     349,753     343,792     359,898     323,082     280,575     265,406  
  Mortgage and other debt (total debt)     163,256     152,302     145,991     174,157     131,849     78,556     60,302  
  Other long-term obligations     37,544     36,270     30,922     33,414     28,609     27,762     25,920  
  Total liabilities     252,835     236,897     231,435     248,619     210,033     162,790     148,459  
  Partners' capital (capital)     120,653     112,856     112,357     111,279     113,049     117,785     116,947  
  Market capitalization at year end     585,575     610,470     445,727     588,112     523,830     707,534     588,080  

Statistics

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Return on total debt and capital     15 %   10 %   6 %   4 %   7 %   15 %   22 %
  Total debt as a percent of total debt and capital     58 %   57 %   57 %   61 %   54 %   40 %   34 %
  Total debt as a percent of total market capitalization     22 %   20 %   25 %   23 %   20 %   10 %   9 %
  Units outstanding—weighted average     35,292     36,241     36,757     36,757     36,759     36,755     37,393  
                              —weighted average—diluted     35,411     36,272     36,789     36,790     36,796     36,831     37,543  
                              —year end     34,701     35,910     36,761     36,757     36,760     36,755     36,755  

Sales Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Residential lots and homes sold     1,284 (1)   1,233 (1)   1,026 (1)   113     487     233     540  
  Industrial and commercial acres sold     36.9     38.5     12.0     28.9     4.5     73.5     24.3  
  Farm acres sold     544     5,501     5,370     3,900     6,750     2,989     3,950  

(1)
Includes lots sold at McDowell Mountain Ranch in Arizona prior to the sale of the project in 1996.

(2)
Includes income-producing properties held for sale, net

10


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

    For 2000, the Company achieved record revenues of $401.0 million primarily as a result of the sale of income properties which included two shopping centers, four apartment complexes and four office buildings. These sales were part of the Company's business strategy, announced in 1999, to sell approximately one-half of its income portfolio to finance the repurchase of 6,384,446 million of its partnership units. In addition to the income properties, 208 residential lots and over 108 acres of commercial and industrial land were sold during the year. These sales, combined with the sale of income properties, added $298.0 million to revenues and $106.0 million to income. Net income for 2000 was $85.4 million, or $3.05 per unit, representing a record high on a per unit basis.

    In 1999, the Company recorded revenues of $322.5 million and net income of $90.4 million as a result of accelerated residential, commercial and industrial land sales in Valencia. Altogether, 1,060 residential lots and joint-venture homes, 63 acres of commercial land and 58 acres of industrial land, including two build-to-suits, were sold. In addition, the Company closed escrow on the sale of the 36,000-acre Suey Ranch as well as its remaining property at the Merced and Cowell ranches.

    The Company's business plan for 2001 anticipates revenues being generated from 1) residential, commercial and industrial land sales; 2) the remaining portfolio of income-producing properties; and 3) sale of two properties identified in the asset sale program that did not close escrow in 2000. Net income from these core operations (before any asset sales) is expected to be approximately 50 cents to 60 cents per unit, compared to 45 cents per unit in 2000. Potential additions to income are expected to be generated from sales of the Bank of America and Spectrum Club buildings and the option on the Broomfield, Colorado property. Anticipated sales will be dependent upon a variety of factors including, but not limited to, identification of a suitable buyer, availability of financing to the buyer, regulatory and legal issues, market conditions, agreement with the buyer on definitive terms and successful completion of the buyer's due diligence.

    The 2001 plan also includes completion of the current unit repurchase program of approximately 1.5 million units in the first half of 2001. If current strong business conditions continue, additional repurchases may be authorized in 2001 depending primarily on the level of land sales that close escrow. Numerous factors could affect the Company's ability to complete the current repurchase program and start a new program including, but not limited to, changing market and economic conditions, rising interest rates, challenges to governmental approvals, and finding suitable buyers for certain properties.

Residential Home and Land Sales

    The Company primarily sells lots to merchant builders who, in turn, build homes for sale. Revenues and income are recorded when title is transferred to the merchant builder. Generally, residential lot sale agreements contain a provision whereby the Company will receive from the merchant builder a portion of the home sales prices above an agreed upon base price ("price participation") and/or in the overall profitability of the home building project after the merchant builder has received an agreed upon return ("profit participation"). If home prices and/or project profitability fall short of the participation thresholds, the Company receives no additional revenues or income and has no financial obligation to the builder. Prior to 2000, the Company participated, on a limited basis, in home construction on lots it owned through joint ventures with certain builders.

    A total of 208 residential lots were sold in 2000 for $12.7 million contributing $5.7 million to income. These lot sales were the last remaining lots in the Bridgeport lake community. Results for 2000 also include $14.4 million in revenues and $5.9 million in income recognized under percentage of

11


completion accounting from lot sales in the prior year and $309,000 received from price and profit participation agreements relating to Valencia lot sales in prior years.

    Lot sales in 2000 were below expectations and the1999 level of 891 residential lots sold because of the Public Utilities Commission's (PUC) decision to combine its review of Valencia Water Company's request to expand its service area together with the water company's water management plan. The PUC requested environmental studies to be submitted on water availability for the projects included in the service area expansion. The water company is in the process of providing the PUC the necessary information. Valencia Water Company expects the PUC to render its decision in the 2001 third quarter. A total of 4,445 residential lots is affected. This includes 1,900 lots that the City of Santa Clarita annexed in December 2000, and 2,545 lots in the Company's West Creek community approved in December 2000 by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors. At December 31, 2000, no residential lots were in escrow.

    In September 2000, the Company divested its 50.1% interest in City Ranch, a joint venture project with Kaufman and Broad of Southern California. Results for 2000 include a $5.2 million loss as a result of the divestiture and expenses incurred in 2000 prior to the divestiture. The divestiture eliminates significant future cash requirements relating to development costs for the 4,500-home project in Palmdale, California and allows the Company to focus its resources on its unit repurchase program and the strong real estate market in Valencia.

    The Company sold a total of 891 residential lots in 1999 which included 597 in the Bridgeport lake community, where finished lots were sold at the highest residential per acre prices in Valencia's history. These combined lot sales added $54.1 million to revenues and $26.6 million to income under percentage of completion accounting. Revenues exceeded $1 million per acre on prime parcels and profit per net acre is expected to average approximately $394,000 when all revenues and income have been realized as remaining land development and amenities are completed. In 1999, the Company also completed the sale of 294 lots in Hasley Hills, just north of Valencia, to Kaufman and Broad. This sale contributed $15.9 million to revenues and $10.7 million to income. At December 31, 1999, no residential lots were in escrow.

    In addition, results for 1999 included $1.5 million received from price and profit participation agreements relating to Valencia lot sales in prior years. This represented the first price and profit participation income received since 1993. Escrow closings from the Company's two remaining joint ventures totaled 169 homes in 1999, contributing $38.0 million to revenues and $3.9 million to income. These closings represented the last homes in the Company's joint-venture program.

    In 1998, the Company sold a total of 1,108 residential lots which added $40.8 million to revenues and $24.2 million to income. Deferred revenues of $2.3 million and income of $766,000 were recognized in 1998 from prior residential lot sales under percentage of completion accounting. Results for 1998 also included escrow closings on 124 joint-venture homes in three projects which contributed $27.7 million to revenues and $2.9 million to income.

    For 2001, the Company plans to market approximately 650 entitled, improved residential lots on 91 net acres in the 1,700-home Westridge Golf Course Community. An additional 300 lots on 40 net acres in Altavista also may be marketed for sale in 2001, depending on results and timing of the PUC decision. The Altavista lots may be marketed for sale as entitled, unimproved lots.

Industrial and Commercial Sales

Industrial Land Sales

    In 2000, escrows closed on 58.8 industrial acres contributing $28.4 million to revenues and $8.5 million to income. No industrial land sales were in escrow at December 31, 2000. In September 2000, the Company agreed to accept a reduced note pay-off in return for accelerating the

12


due date on a 1998 industrial land sale note with scheduled maturities through September 2002. This resulted in the Company recording a $2.1 million charge to income to reduce the note receivable and accrued interest to the negotiated $14.4 million pay-off amount. The note was collected in December 2000.

    In 1999, the Company sold 57.7 industrial acres, including two build-to-suit facilities totaling 280,000 square feet on 13.7 acres for $13.7 million. These closings contributed $40.1 million to revenues and $8.7 million to income. At December 31, 1999, two industrial parcels totaling 4.1 acres were in escrow for $2.7 million. In 1998, the Company closed escrow on 111 acres of industrial land, including four buildings constructed as part of its build-to-suit/lease program. These escrow closings contributed $62.6 million to revenues and $16.1 million to income.

    As of December 31, 2000, there are approximately 390 net acres of entitled industrial land remaining in Valencia. With few large land parcels available in Los Angeles County, the Company anticipates sales in the range of 50 to 75 acres per year to build-out. Additionally, consideration of marketing concepts for the prime acreage west of Interstate 5 surrounding the Six Flags Magic Mountain amusement park has started.

Commercial Land Sales

    In 2000, a total of 49.7 commercial acres closed escrow contributing $36.9 million to revenues and $18.9 million to income. The sales included a 16.5-acre parcel for a retail center for $12.9 million adding $6.3 million to income. Results for 2000 also include revenues of $3.2 million and income of $1.9 million recognized under percentage of completion accounting from the prior year sale of an apartment site. At December 31, 2000, seven commercial parcels totaling 37.9 acres were in escrow for $24.9 million with closings expected in 2001. The Company's ability to complete sales in escrow and generate future land sales is subject to market and other conditions beyond the control of the Company.

    Commercial escrow closings in 1999 totaled 62.8 acres which contributed $51.4 million to revenues and $30.1 million to income. Two apartment sites totaling 49.9 acres for approximately 1,100 units were the major commercial land sales during the year. At December 31, 1999, three commercial parcels totaling 13.2 acres were in escrow for $7.9 million.

    In 1998, commercial escrow closings included a 12.6-acre, restricted use site for a senior apartment project and two small commercial parcels totaling 2.0 acres. These sales combined contributed $2.5 million to revenues and $608,000 to income.

Income Property Sales

    Sales of income-producing properties in 2000 included Castaic Village Shopping Center, Plaza del Rancho, four office buildings and four apartment complexes. These sales combined added $220 million to revenues and $72.9 million to income. The primary contributor to the results was the sale of the apartment complexes for $129.0 million, contributing $74.0 million to income.

    The sale of the four office buildings for $72.3 million exceeded the construction costs by approximately $7.8 million. A condition of the sale includes a monthly rental payment by the Company to the buyer for 161,000 square feet of building space (principally to be occupied by Princess Cruises) until Princess' rent commencement date in the first quarter of 2001. In addition, the Company has agreed to lease back approximately 49,000 square feet of retail space for 121/2 years. With regard to the retail leaseback, accounting guidelines do not allow the consideration of any future new or renewal leasing activity to reduce the calculation of the net lease obligation. As a result, the Company recorded an accounting loss on the sale of the buildings of $4.9 million. This amount includes a loss of $2.2 million for a restaurant tenant which closed in late December 2000. Management believes that

13


sub-leasing of the retail space will more than offset this accounting loss over the life of the leaseback and ultimately will result in additional revenues and income. As of December 31, 2000, approximately 25,000 square feet of the retail space was leased.

    In 2001, the Company is marketing for sale its Bank of America and Spectrum Club buildings. These sales are expected to generate $15 million to $16 million in revenues based upon 2000 year-end values. The ability to complete these sales in 2001 will be dependent upon a variety of factors including, but not limited to, identification of a suitable buyer, availability of financing to the buyer, market conditions, agreement with the buyer on definitive terms and successful completion of the buyer's due diligence.

    No income-producing properties were sold in 1999; however, the Company recognized $6.3 million in deferred revenues and a loss of $400,000 on the prior year sale of Valencia Marketplace, a 705,000-square-foot high-volume retail center.

    In 1998, the Company sold Valencia Marketplace for $111 million cash and recognized $98 million in revenues and $35 million in income under percentage of completion accounting. Also in 1998, results included the sale of Valley Business Center, a 56,800-square-foot mixed-use center on approximately 15 acres, and the remaining building in Valencia Industrial Center which combined added $8.8 million to revenues and $2.4 million to income.

Community Development

    Community development expenses in 2000 decreased 6% from the prior year primarily due to expenses in the prior year relating to Newhall Ranch entitlements and certain initial costs relating to commercial properties under development. Community development expenses are expected to increase about 20% in 2001 with the continued focus on entitlements, planning and community marketing to complete the projected sellout of Valencia residential land by 2005 and begin the development of Newhall Ranch.

    Community development expenses in 1999 increased to $12.3 million, or 14%, from 1998 due to entitlements work for Newhall Ranch, certain initial costs relating to commercial properties under development and a strategic marketing program. Certain costs for developing Newhall Ranch subsequent to the approval of the Specific Plan in 1999 are being capitalized to the project.

    The Company has started planning and design work on the infrastructure for the 21,600-home Newhall Ranch project. Detailed planning is proceeding on two of the five villages planned in the community. Riverwood, a village planned along Highway 126 overlooking the Santa Clara River, is expected to contain approximately 3,200 homes, 122 acres of commercial property, 256 acres for a business park and 130 acres of mixed-use development. Development of The Mesas, a second village south of the river, is also in the planning process. Current plans are for approximately 8,000 homes and 1.5 million square feet of commercial development.

    Additional research and analyses is proceeding on six issues in the project's Environmental Impact Report, which were identified in June 2000 by a Kern County Superior Court Judge as requiring further environmental review. As previously reported, the six issues include the impact of the 21,600-home Newhall Ranch development on the Salt Creek wildlife corridor and traffic in Ventura County; biological impacts on the Santa Clara River corridor; consistency with the General Plan and impacts in Significant Ecological Areas (SEAs); adequacy and reliability of the water supply; and a further alternative site analysis for the water reclamation plant location. The court ruled in the Company's favor on all other issues raised by the opponents. The "affordable housing" opponent has appealed the Superior Court's decision.

    The Company believes the six issues in question can be resolved to the satisfaction of the Court in 2001, in which case the development is expected to start in 2003. However, the length of time the

14


public hearings and judicial process will take is difficult to predict, and circumstances beyond the Company's control could further delay resolution of the issues. The additional environmental analyses of the six issues will be circulated for public review and comments. Following the public review period, both the Los Angeles County Regional Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors must review the issues, hold public hearings and certify the additional environmental analyses before the case can be referred back to the Court. The Company anticipates being before the Regional Planning Commission in the spring of 2001, through the Board of Supervisors by the fall and back before the Superior Court judge by the end of 2001. An adverse decision by the County or Court and/or additional legal action will likely delay the start of the development of Newhall Ranch beyond 2003.

    The Company has begun land development work on Valencia Westridge, which will feature 1,700 homes surrounding a Tournament Players Club (TPC) golf course, a joint venture with PGA TOUR Golf Course Properties. The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors approved the community in May 1999. Opponents to the project subsequently filed a lawsuit under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) challenging the Board of Supervisors' approval. In May 2000, a Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge dismissed the lawsuit. This dismissal is being appealed. The Company expects to deliver lots for sale in the second half of 2001, subject to the results of the pending appeal.

    In December 2000, the West Creek community in the North River planning area consisting of 2,545 homes received final approval from the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors. Opponents to the community have filed a CEQA lawsuit challenging the Board of Supervisors' approval. As with prior CEQA lawsuits, the results of these types of legal challenges are difficult to predict. An adverse decision will likely delay the development of the community beyond the delay created by the PUC process previously mentioned.

    The Company is in discussion with potential buyers interested in acquiring the Company's option to develop the 1,800-acre project in Broomfield, Colorado, located between Denver and Boulder. The plan calls for approximately 3,000 homes and 215 acres of office and other commercial development. As of December 31, 2000, the Company has expended $2.4 million on the project and, if the option is sold, would expect the sale to generate a profit.

Income-Producing Properties

    In December 1999, the Company announced its intention to sell approximately half of its income portfolio to accommodate the repurchase of more than 6.3 million of the Company's partnership units authorized for repurchase in September 1999. Accordingly, in 2000, four apartment complexes, four office buildings, a neighborhood shopping center and a mixed-use retail property were sold.

    Revenues in 2000 increased 15% from the prior year while income increased 32% primarily due to suspension of depreciation on income properties while they were held for sale which accounted for approximately 56% of the increase in income compared to 1999. Improved results from hotel operations, continued high retail occupancy and favorable rents also contributed to increases in revenues and income for 2000.

    In December 2000, the Company announced it was no longer marketing for sale the Valencia Town Center regional shopping mall and entertainment center. In August 2000, a potential buyer terminated its due diligence work due to Edwards Theaters' bankruptcy filing. Edwards has not completed its reorganization; however, it remained current on rent due as of December 31, 2000. In December 2000, a charge of $4 million was recorded for depreciation that had been suspended when the assets were held for sale. The Company also announced that it terminated discussions with a potential buyer for its landfill and is proceeding with its contractual right to terminate the lease with the current operator. The operator recently filed a lawsuit against the Company in connection with the termination. The Company is currently engaged in the discovery phase of the lawsuit.

15


    In 1999, revenues from the income portfolio increased 31% and income declined 3% compared to 1998. The income decline resulted primarily from depreciation associated with new properties and operating expenses in connection with the Hyatt Valencia Hotel. In 1998, revenues and income from the portfolio increased 16% and 13%, respectively, over 1997 benefiting from the continued development of new income-producing properties as well as excellent retail and apartment occupancies and favorable rents throughout the portfolio.

    The Company's shopping centers continue to have high occupancy rates with Valencia Town Center 99% leased and adjacent Town Center Drive retail 81% leased. NorthPark Village Square and River Oaks retail centers are both 100% leased including spaces with signed leases but not yet occupied. A 26,000-square-foot mixed-use building next to the Hyatt Valencia hotel is 100% leased.

Valencia Water Company

    Valencia Water Company is a regulated public utility and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, serving over 22,000 metered customers in the Valencia area. In 2000, revenues increased 8% and income increased 18% compared to 1999 due to the continuing expansion of the utility's customer base. Revenues in 1999 increased 20% and income increased 8% compared to 1998 primarily due to an 11% increase in the customer base. Revenues in 1999 also benefited from drier weather while income gains were impacted by increased maintenance and operating costs.

Agricultural Operations

    Agriculture revenues and income, including the Company's energy operations, decreased in 2000 primarily due to the sale of over 39,000 acres of farm land in 1999 and lower prices for oranges. The decreases were partially offset by higher revenues and income from energy operations due to higher oil and gas prices. Revenues and income increased in 1999 primarily due to excellent citrus yields and prices. The income comparison to 1998 is impacted by a non-cash write-off of $1.9 million relating to mineral rights associated with previously sold ranch land.

Ranch Sales

    No farm land was sold in 2000. In 1999, the Company completed the sale of the 36,000-acre Suey Ranch and the three remaining parcels at the Merced Ranch as part of the Company's strategy of selling farm land not suitable for development. These sales combined contributed $29.0 million to revenues and $25.0 million to income.

    A 970-acre parcel of the Merced Ranch closed escrow in 1998 for $1.1 million, contributing $775,000 to income. Also included in 1998 results is $323,000 recognized from the 1996 sale of 539 acres of crop land at the Suey Ranch. The sale of 1,674 acres of vineyards and undeveloped land at the Suey Ranch in 1997 for $17.9 million added $17.0 million to income.

    The Company's remaining agricultural properties include the 14,000-acre New Columbia Ranch in Madera County and the 1,000-acre Newhall Orchard in Ventura County. Most of the remaining 15,000 acres owned by the Company in Ventura County are leased for cattle grazing.

General and Administrative Expenses

    A net increase of 4% in general and administrative expenses in 2000 is primarily due to a reduction of $2.2 million in land acquisition activities compared to the prior year being more than offset by an increase of $3.1 million in compensation expense. A 14% increase in expenses in 1999 over 1998 was primarily for land acquisition activities. General and administrative expenses are expected to decrease by about 30% in 2001 compared to 2000.

16


Interest and Other Expense, net

    Net interest expense for 2000 increased 73% compared to the prior year due to increased borrowings under credit facilities to fund partnership unit repurchases prior to the sale of income properties, most of which occurred in December 2000. Interest expense in 2001 is expected to decrease substantially due to lower debt levels against credit facilities and the assumption of mortgages totaling $49.0 million by the buyer of the Company's four apartment complexes.

    An increase of 45% in net interest expense in 1999 compared to 1998 was due to higher debt levels against lines of credit, a new $25 million mortgage financing secured by two shopping centers completed in the 1999 third quarter and a reduction in capitalized interest due to the completion of several income portfolio projects. The increase was partially offset by higher interest income from land sales notes.

    In 1998, reduction of debt due to the receipt of $111 million cash upon the sale of Valencia Marketplace in June 1998 and an increase in interest capitalized to portfolio projects contributed to a decrease in net interest expense of 39% from 1997 expense. In 1998, interest income from increased cash available for investment was offset by a reduction in interest income due to collection of notes from prior land sales.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Liquidity and Capital Resources

    At December 31, 2000, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $3.7 million and $158.8 million in available lines of credit, net of $21.2 in letters of credit. Borrowings outstanding totaled $2 million against unsecured lines of credit and $12 million against a revolving mortgage loan. In addition, the Company had fixed rate debt totaling $60.6 million. The Company believes it has adequate sources of cash from operations and debt capacity, including lines of credit, to finance future operations on both a short- and long-term basis and, combined with anticipated land and income property sales, to fund its approved partnership unit repurchases. Debt levels are targeted to remain at or below 60% of the appraised value of remaining income-producing properties. The Company ended 2000 with a debt to income portfolio ratio of 23% providing adequate debt capacity in 2001 to fund ongoing operations and continue unit repurchases. Furthermore, at December 31, 2000, there was no debt against raw land or land under development inventories in Valencia.

    In November 2000, three matured debt facilities totaling $219 million were replaced. An existing $159 million unsecured line of credit was replaced with a $130 million three-year, unsecured revolving line of credit; a $20 million unsecured line of credit was replaced by a one-year, $40 million unsecured line of credit (which was reduced to $10 million after the sale of the four office buildings); and a $40 million mortgage secured by Valencia Town Center was replaced by a one-year, $50 million secured mortgage.

    In September 1999, the Board of Directors approved a plan to repurchase over 6.3 million partnership units, or approximately 20% of the Company's outstanding units at the time of the authorization, which included 884,446 units remaining for repurchase from a previous authorization. As of December 31, 2000, a total of 4,899,502 units has been repurchased of which 3,175,550 units were repurchased in 2000 for $86.5 million, or an average price of $27.25 per unit, and 1,484,944 units remained to be repurchased in 2001.

    The Company repurchases units from time to time in the open market or through block transactions. Numerous factor factors which may affect the Company's ability to complete its unit repurchase program include, but are not limited to, governmental approvals, changing market conditions, rising interest rates and the ability to find suitable buyers for certain properties.

17


    As of December 31, 2000, there were no material commitments for capital expenditures other than approximately $23 million for the completion of two office buildings which were sold in December 2000 and the expected landfill lease termination. In 2001, the Company expects to invest over $40 million in major roads and freeway improvements to enable the Company to continue its sales program in Valencia.

    The following discussion relates to principal items in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Operating Activities

    Net cash provided by operating activities in 2000 totaled $226.0 million and included sales of 208 residential lots, over 108 acres of industrial and commercial land and sales of income properties which included four apartment complexes, four office buildings, a neighborhood shopping center and a mixed-use center. These sales combined provided $239.8 million in cash and $10.5 million in notes. In addition, notes totaling $49.7 million from land sales in prior years were collected and $5.1 million was received from a right-of-way purchase by Cal Trans. The notes collected included $14.4 million from a 1998 land sale note on which the Company recorded a $2.1 million charge to income in 2000 to reduce the note principal and accrued interest to a negotiated $14.4 million payoff amount in return for accelerating the due date to December 2000.

    Expenditures for land under development inventories in 2000 totaled $76.1 million and were partially offset by $52.4 million in cost of sales relief. The expenditures included $69.7 million for land preparation and infrastructure to ready land for development or sale with the remainder primarily for agricultural crop costs.

    Net cash provided by operating activities in 1999 totaled $122.4 million and included sales of 1,060 residential lots and homes; 121 acres of industrial and commercial land including two build-to-suit buildings; sale of the Suey Ranch and the remaining property at the Merced and Cowell Ranches. These sales combined provided $222.8 million in cash and $30.2 million in notes. Expenditures for land under development inventories in 1999 totaled $103.9 million and were more than offset by $112.2 million in cost of sales relief. The expenditures primarily were for land preparation and infrastructure to ready land for development or sale, home construction and agricultural crop costs.

    Net cash provided by operating activities in 1998 totaled $167.6 million and included sales of 1,232 residential lots and homes in the Valencia area plus 125 acres of industrial and commercial land including four build-to-suit/lease buildings; sale of Valencia Marketplace, a high-volume retail center; and 970 acres of farm land. These sales combined provided $227.5 million in cash and $15.3 million in notes. In addition, $4.0 million was collected on notes from land sales in prior years. Expenditures for land under development inventories and home construction totaled $79.7 million in 1998 and were more than offset by $85.9 million in cost of sales relief. Expenditures in Valencia were related to land preparation and infrastructure to ready land for development or sale and home construction advances for the Company's homebuilding partnerships. The Company's net investment in homebuilding partnerships totaled $13.5 million at the end of 1998.

Investing Activities

    Expenditures for development of income-producing properties totaled $27.4 million in 2000 and primarily were for two office buildings under construction to be occupied by Princess Cruises and the Valencia Entertainment Center expansion. The office buildings were sold in December 2000, however, the Company is obligated to complete construction of the buildings which is anticipated in the first quarter of 2001.

    Development of income-producing properties in 1999 primarily were related to Montecito apartments and various retail/office/entertainment projects in Valencia Town Center and expenditures totaled $68.0 million.

18


    In 1998, expenditures for development of income-producing properties in Valencia totaled $101.8 million. Major expenditures included $27.5 million for the Hyatt Valencia Hotel and Santa Clarita Conference Center; $32.8 million for various retail/office/entertainment projects in Valencia Town Center including parking structures; $11.6 million for a six-story office building occupied by Princess Cruises; and $6.6 million for the 210-unit Montecito apartment complex in Valencia Town Center. Also included was $14.1 million for Valencia Marketplace which was sold in June 1998. The Company was obligated to complete the construction and leasing of the center and the sale was recognized under percentage of completion accounting.

    Purchase of property and equipment expenditures in 2000, 1999 and 1998 primarily were for water utility construction.

Financing Activities

    In 2000, distributions totaling $21.2 million were paid which consisted of four quarterly distributions of $.10 per unit and a $.35 per unit special distribution. Distributions totaling $19.7 million were paid in 1999 and consisted of four quarterly distributions of $.10 per unit and a $.22 per unit special distribution. In 1998, distributions totaling $17.8 million were paid consisting of four quarterly distributions of $.10 per unit and a special distribution of $.12 per unit. The Company's policy is to provide sufficient distributions, including special distributions, to pay the taxes associated with Company earnings. The declaration of distributions, and the amount declared, are determined by the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis taking into account the Company's earnings, financial condition and prospects.

    A decrease in mortgage and other debt of $87.2 million in 2000 included an $85 million reduction in lines of credit and the remainder for scheduled debt service on fixed-rate, secured debt. As planned, the Company utilized available debt capacity during the year to fund the repurchase program until major asset and land sales were completed. Mortgages totaling $49.0 million were assumed by the buyer of the apartment complexes in December 2000 and a $12.0 million note payable was cancelled upon divestiture of the Company's interest in the City Ranch joint-venture with Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc. in September 2000.

    In 1999, increases in mortgage and other debt included a $44.7 million portfolio mortgage financing which was replaced with three financings totaling $50 million secured by three apartment complexes and a new $25 million financing secured by two neighborhood shopping centers. Also, in August 1999, a $12.0 million note was recorded in connection with the Company's acquisition of a 50.1% interest in City Ranch, a joint-venture project with Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc. Borrowings outstanding against lines of credit increased by $36.2 million to $99.4 million at December 31, 1999. In addition to scheduled debt service on fixed rate debt, decreases in mortgage and other debt in 1999 included the refinanced portfolio mortgage and repayment of a $12 million unsecured financing.

    Upon the sale of Valencia Marketplace in June 1998, for $111 million cash, the Company paid off all outstanding debt against lines of credit and a revolving mortgage facility. At December 31, 1998, $23.2 million was outstanding against lines of credit and $40 million against the revolving mortgage facility. In 1998, a $6 million scheduled principal payment was paid on an unsecured financing and a $3.3 million commercial mortgage was paid in full. Also, a construction financing for a homebuilding joint venture was paid upon completion of the project in 1998.

Unit Repurchases

    In 2000, 1999 and 1998, the Company repurchased 3,175,550 partnership units for $86.5 million, 3,111,278 partnership units for $75.8 million and 1,909,613 partnership units for $49.0 million, respectively. For the three year period ended 2000, the Company has repurchased approximately 24% of its total partnership units outstanding at the end of 1997.

19


New Accounting Pronouncements

    The Company has reviewed the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (SAB 101), Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, effective October 1, 2000, as amended by SAB 101A and SAB 101B. This pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

    The Company has reviewed the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 (SFAS No. 133), Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended by SFAS Nos. 137 and 138. This pronouncement is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

INFLATION, RISKS AND RELATED FACTORS AFFECTING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

    Except for historical matters, the matters discussed in this report are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. We have tried, wherever practical, to identify these forward-looking statements by using words like "anticipate," believe," "estimate," "project," "expect," and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about plans; opportunities; negotiations; market and economic conditions; development, construction, and sales activities; and availability of financing.

    We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our current beliefs and are based on information currently available to us. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or changes in circumstances.

    These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to differ from those expressed in or implied by these statements. In particular, among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are:

    Sales of Real Estate:  The majority of the Company's revenues is generated by its real estate operations. The ability of the Company to consummate sales of real estate is dependent on various factors including, but not limited to, availability of financing to the buyer, agreement with buyers on definitive terms regulatory and legal issues and successful completion of the buyer's due diligence. The fact that a real estate transaction has entered escrow does not necessarily mean that the transaction ultimately will close. Therefore, the timing of sales may differ from that anticipated by the Company. The inability to close sales as anticipated could adversely impact the recognition of revenue in any specific period.

    Economic Conditions:  Real estate development is significantly impacted by general and local economic conditions which are beyond the control of the Company. The Company's real estate operations are concentrated in Southern California. The regional economy is profoundly affected by the entertainment, technology, defense and certain other segments. Consequently, all sectors of real estate development for the Company tend to be cyclical. While the economy of Southern California continues to be strong, there can be no assurances that present trends will continue.

    Inflation:  The Company believes it is well positioned against the effects of inflation. Historically, during periods of inflation, the Company has been able to increase selling prices of properties to offset rising costs of land development and construction. Recently, land values have been increasing at a faster rate than costs. However, there are no assurances that this trend will continue. A portion of the commercial income portfolio is protected from inflation since percentage rent clauses and Consumer Price Index increases in the Company's leases tend to adjust rental receipts for inflation, while the underlying value of commercial properties has tended to rise over the long term.

20


    Interest Rates and Financing:  Fluctuations in interest rates and the availability of financing have an important impact on the Company's performance. Sales of the Company's properties could be adversely impacted by the inability of buyers to obtain adequate financing. Further, the Company's real estate development activities are dependent on the availability of adequate sources of capital. Certain of the Company's credit facilities bear interest at variable rates and would be negatively impacted by increasing interest rates.

    Competition:  The sale and leasing of residential, industrial and commercial real estate is highly competitive, with competition coming from numerous and varied sources. The degree of competition is affected by such factors as the supply of real estate available which is comparable to that sold and leased by the Company and the level of demand for such real estate. Valencia experienced a slight decrease in its new home sale market share at both the local and the county level in 2000, due to the temporary decline in new home inventory. There is no assurance that this new home sales decline will reverse in the future even with an increasing supply of new homes in Valencia given competing projects in the region. This could impact the Company's ability to sell residential land.

    Geographic Concentration:  The Company's real estate development activities are focused on the 19,400 acres that it owns in Los Angeles County. The Company's entire commercial income portfolio is located in the Valencia area. Therefore, any factors affecting that concentrated area, such as changes in the housing market, economic conditions and environmental factors, which cannot be predicted with certainty, could affect future results.

    Exposure to Natural Occurrences:  The Company's real estate development and sales activities may be affected by natural occurrences such as earthquakes and weather conditions that may impact progress of infrastructure construction and land development, and the pace of sales.

    Government Regulation and Entitlement Risks:  In developing its projects, the Company must obtain the approval of numerous governmental authorities regulating such matters as permitted land uses, density and traffic, and the provision of utility services such as electricity, water and waste disposal. In addition, the Company is subject to a variety of federal, state and local laws and regulations concerning protection of health and the environment. This government regulation affects the types of projects which can be pursued by the Company and increases the cost of development and ownership. The Company devotes substantial financial and managerial resources to comply with these requirements. To varying degrees, certain permits and approvals will be required to complete the developments currently being undertaken or planned by the Company. Furthermore, the timing, cost and scope of planned projects may be subject to legal challenges, particularly large projects with regional impacts. (See following "Litigation" discussion.) In addition, the continued effectiveness of permits already granted is subject to factors such as changes in policies, rules and regulations and their interpretation and application. The ability to obtain necessary approvals and permits for its projects can be beyond the Company's control and could restrict or prevent development of otherwise desirable new properties. The Company's results of operations in any period will be affected by the amount of entitled properties the Company has in inventory.

    Litigation:  The land use approval processes the Company must follow to ultimately develop its projects have become increasingly complex. Moreover, the statutes, regulations and ordinances governing the approval processes provide third parties the opportunity to challenge the proposed plans and approvals. As a result, the prospect of, and actual, third-party challenges to planned real estate developments have provided additional uncertainties in real estate development planning and entitlements. Third-party challenges in the form of litigation will, by its nature, adversely affect the length of time required to obtain the necessary approvals. In addition, adverse decisions arising from any litigation increase the costs and may adversely affect the design, scope, plans and profitability of a project.

21


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

    The Company is exposed to market risk primarily due to fluctuations in interest rates. The Company utilizes both fixed rate and variable rate debt. At December 31, 2000, the Company had $14.0 million of variable debt with an average interest rate of 7.94% and $60.6 million of fixed rate debt with interest rates ranging from 7.33% to 8.45%.

    The table below presents principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates of the Company's long-term fixed rate and variable rate debt at December 31, 2000 by expected maturity dates:

Dollars in thousands

  2001
  2002
  2003
  2004
  2005
  Thereafter
  Total
  Fair
Value

Mortgage and Other Debt                                                
  Fixed Rate Debt   $ 1,362   $ 1,481   $ 10,970   $ 1,509   $ 1,657   $ 43,578   $ 60,557   $ 60,557
  Weighted Average Interest Rate     7.57     7.55     8.32     7.35     7.37     7.55     7.68      
  Variable Rate Debt (1)   $ 12,000   $ 2,000                           $ 14,000   $ 14,000
  Weighted Average Interest Rate     7.94     7.97                             7.94      

(1)
The Company has a $50 million revolving mortgage facility, which bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.25% against which $12 million was outstanding at December 31, 2000. The Company also has unsecured lines of credit consisting of a $130 million line and a $10 million line on which the interest rate is LIBOR plus 1.25%—1.45% against which no borrowings were outstanding at December 31, 2000 and a $2 million line on which the rate is LIBOR plus 1.35% against which $2 million was outstanding at December 31, 2000. The amounts set forth in the table above assume that the outstanding amounts under the variable rate credit facilities will be repaid at the facilities' respective maturity dates. Management believes that these lines will be renewed at maturity with similar terms.

    There is inherent rollover risk for borrowings as they mature and are renewed at current market rates. The extent of this risk is not quantifiable or predictable because of the variability of future interest rates and the Company's future financing requirements. The Company manages its interest rate risk by maintaining a conservative ratio of fixed rate, long-term debt to total debt in order to maintain variable rate exposure at an acceptable level and by taking advantage of favorable market conditions for long-term debt. In addition, the Company's guideline for total debt is not to exceed 60% of the appraised value of the income portfolio.

22


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITEM 8:

Report of Independent Auditors

Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2000 and 1999

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners' Capital for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

23


Report of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors of Newhall Management Corporation and Partners of The Newhall
Land and Farming Company:

    We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Newhall Land and Farming Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in partners' capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

    We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

    In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Newhall Land and Farming Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Los Angeles, California
January 16, 2001

24


Consolidated Statements of Income

 
  Years ended December 31,
 
In thousands, except per unit

  2000
  1999
  1998
 
Revenues                    
  Real estate                    
    Residential home and land sales   $ 27,210   $ 109,608   $ 70,867  
    Industrial and commercial sales     295,119     109,200     172,320  
    Commercial operations                    
      Income-producing properties     58,219     50,459     38,622  
      Valencia Water Company     13,132     12,202     10,209  
  Agriculture                    
    Operations     7,288     12,080     11,270  
    Ranch sales         28,957     1,390  
   
 
 
 
Total Revenues     400,968     322,506     304,678  
   
 
 
 
Costs and Operating Expenses                    
  Real estate                    
    Residential home and land sales     23,361     71,904     47,258  
    Industrial and commercial sales     196,508     67,936     123,657  
    Community development     11,501     12,257     10,710  
    Commercial operations                    
      Income-producing properties     35,629     33,332     20,985  
      Valencia Water Company     9,715     9,302     7,515  
  Agriculture                    
    Operations     6,281     8,567     10,367  
    Ranch sales         3,995     292  
   
 
 
 
Total Costs and Operating Expenses     282,995     207,293     220,784  
   
 
 
 
Operating Income     117,973     115,213     83,894  
    General and administrative expense     (14,642 )   (14,431 )   (12,634 )
    Interest and other expense, net     (17,935 )   (10,390 )   (7,180 )
   
 
 
 
Net Income   $ 85,396   $ 90,392   $ 64,080  
   
 
 
 
Net Income Per Unit   $ 3.09   $ 2.88   $ 1.89  
   
 
 
 
Net Income Per Unit—Assuming Dilution   $ 3.05   $ 2.85   $ 1.86  
   
 
 
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements

25


Consolidated Balance Sheets

 
  December 31,
In thousands

  2000
  1999
Assets            
  Cash and cash equivalents   $ 3,717   $ 1,624
  Accounts and notes receivable     17,154     61,567
  Land under development     63,155     39,401
  Land held for future development     22,419     28,570
  Income-producing properties held for sale, net     12,720     149,433
  Income-producing properties, net     147,785     131,627
  Property and equipment, net     67,631     61,318
  Investment in joint ventures     591     16,682
  Other assets and deferred charges     16,536     14,602
   
 
    $ 351,708   $ 504,824
   
 
Liabilities and Partners' Capital            
  Accounts payable   $ 28,267   $ 24,244
  Accrued expenses     68,932     46,329
  Deferred revenues     3,137     21,227
  Mortgage and other debt     74,557     222,825
  Advances and contributions from developers for utility construction     32,166     25,690
  Other liabilities     25,445     24,784
   
 
      Total liabilities     232,504     365,099
  Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)            
  Partners' capital            
    26,590 units outstanding, excluding 10,182 units in treasury (cost—$242,098) at December 31, 2000 and 29,668 units outstanding, excluding 7,104 units in treasury (cost—$157,394) at December 31, 1999     119,204     139,725
   
 
    $ 351,708   $ 504,824
   
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements

26


Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 
  Years ended December 31,
 
In thousands

  2000
  1999
  1998
 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:                    
  Net income   $ 85,396   $ 90,392   $ 64,080  
  Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:                    
    Depreciation and amortization     13,800     15,296     10,101  
    Loss on sale of office buildings     4,888          
    Loss on divesture of joint venture     4,445          
    Write-down of note receivable     2,149          
    (Increase) decrease in land under development     (17,603 )   9,670     5,994  
    Decrease (increase) in accounts and notes receivable     42,766     (31,312 )   (11,228 )
    Increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred revenues     4,304     9,847     20,637  
    Cost of property sold     82,608     26,617     77,564  
    Other adjustments, net     (1,012 )   1,840     430  
   
 
 
 
  Net cash provided by operating activities     221,741     122,350     167,578  
   
 
 
 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:                    
  Development of income-producing properties     (27,441 )   (67,988 )   (101,789 )
  Purchase of property and equipment     (9,669 )   (8,672 )   (9,133 )
  (Investment in) distribution from joint ventures     (84 )   (4,190 )   22  
   
 
 
 
  Net cash used in investing activities     (37,194 )   (80,850 )   (110,900 )
   
 
 
 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:                    
  Distributions paid     (21,213 )   (19,746 )   (17,784 )
  Borrowings on mortgage and other debt     82,600     115,698     15,100  
  Repayment of mortgage and other debt     (169,845 )   (62,506 )   (14,437 )
  Increase (decrease) in advances and contributions from developers for utility construction     6,476     (776 )   7,621  
  Purchase of partnership units     (82,306 )   (75,818 )   (49,043 )
  Other, net     1,834     1,084     1,283  
   
 
 
 
  Net cash used in financing activities     (182,454 )   (42,064 )   (57,260 )
   
 
 
 
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents     2,093     (564 )   (582 )
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year     1,624     2,188     2,770  
   
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year   $ 3,717   $ 1,624   $ 2,188  
   
 
 
 
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:                    
  Interest paid (net of amount capitalized)   $ 20,504   $ 13,396   $ 7,562  
   
 
 
 
Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:                    
  Divesture of joint venture   $ 16,469          
  Note payable in connection with investment in joint venture     (12,024 ) $ 12,024      
  Assumption of debt on sale of real estate     (48,999 )        
  Payable for unit repurchases     (4,232 )        
   
 
 
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements

27


Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners' Capital

In thousands

  Number
of Units

  Partners'
Capital

 
Balance at December 31, 1997   34,527   $ 145,277  
  Net income       64,080  
  Distributions       (17,784 )
  Purchase of partnership units   (1,910 )   (49,043 )
  Other activity, net   59     1,283  
   
 
 
Balance at December 31, 1998   32,676     143,813  
   
 
 
  Net income       90,392  
  Distributions       (19,746 )
  Purchase of partnership units   (3,111 )   (75,818 )
  Other activity, net   103     1,084  
   
 
 
Balance at December 31, 1999   29,668     139,725  
   
 
 
  Net income       85,396  
  Distributions       (21,213 )
  Purchase of partnership units   (3,176 )   (86,538 )
  Other activity, net   98     1,834  
   
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2000   26,590   $ 119,204  
   
 
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements

28


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2000

Note 1. Organization

    The Newhall Land and Farming Company (a California Limited Partnership) the "Company" or the "Partnership"), is organized as a publicly traded limited partnership. The general partners of the Company are Newhall Management Limited Partnership, the Managing General Partner and Newhall General Partnership. Two executive officers and the Managing General Partner are the general partners of Newhall General Partnership.

Note 2. Business Segments and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Operations and Business Segments

    The Company operates in two lines of business: real estate and agriculture. The business segments of the Company's real estate operations consist of residential; industrial and commercial; development and operation of income-producing properties; Valencia Water Company, a public water utility; and community development. Agriculture consists primarily of farming and energy operations and sales of non-strategic farm land.

    Information as to identifiable assets, capital expenditures and depreciation for these segments is summarized and reconciled in Note 10. Significant accounting policies related to the Company's segments are:

Residential

Land Sales

    Sales are recorded at the time escrow is closed provided that: (1) there has been a minimum down payment of 20% or 25% depending upon the type and timeframe for development of property sold, (2) the buyer has met adequate continuing investment criteria and (3) the Company, as the seller, has no material continuing involvement in the property. Where the Company has an obligation to complete certain future development, revenue is deferred in the ratio of the cost of development to be completed to the total cost of the property being sold under percentage of completion accounting. Land under development includes land, direct and allocated construction costs for land and infrastructure development plus project amenities. As land is sold, estimated total costs at completion for the specific project are charged ratably to cost of sales.

Home Sales

    The Company's income from home sales comes from sales of completed single- and multi-family homes to homebuyers through joint ventures. The Company records revenues and its portion of income as the venture closes escrow on sales to homebuyers. In 2000, the Company did not have any homebuilding joint ventures.

Industrial and Commercial

    Industrial and commercial land sales and respective land under development inventories are accounted for under the same criteria as described in the Residential Land Sales section. The industrial and commercial division is also responsible for the development of the Company's income-producing properties. Upon completion of construction, the property is reported with Income-Producing Properties.

29


Community Development

    Preliminary planning and entitlement costs are charged to expense when incurred. After the earlier of specific plan or tentative map approval, certain development costs are capitalized to the identified project.

Income-Producing Properties

    The Company owns and leases, commercial buildings, shopping centers and land to tenants. Rents are typically based on the greater of a percentage of the lessee's gross revenues or a minimum rent. Most lease agreements require that the lessee pay all taxes, maintenance, insurance and certain other operating expenses applicable to leased properties.

Valencia Water Company

    Valencia Water Company (a California corporation), a wholly-owned subsidiary, is a public water utility subject to regulation by the California Public Utilities Commission. Water utility revenues include amounts billed monthly to customers and an estimated amount of unbilled revenues. Income taxes are included in operating expenses. Deferred income taxes are reflected in the consolidated financial statements.

Agriculture

    Revenue is recognized as crops are delivered to farm cooperatives and other purchasers. At the time of delivery, the Company estimates the proceeds to be received from the cooperatives and records these amounts as unbilled receivables. Costs incurred during the development stage of orchard and vineyard crops (ranging from 3 to 10 years) are capitalized and amortized over the productive life of the trees or vines. Farming inventories include crops in process and harvested crops and are valued at the lower of cost or market, determined on the first-in, first-out method.

    Agricultural ranch sales are accounted for under the same criteria as described for land sales in the Residential Land Sales section.

Central Administration

    Central Administration includes the Company's corporate functions including executive offices, treasury, tax, employee relations, corporate accounting, finance, information systems, headquarters facilities, secretary/legal, investor relations, market research, internal audit and in prior years, land acquisition. Except for certain costs relating to the headquarters facilities and specific services billed to Valencia Water Company, expenses for these functions are expensed as general and administrative expenses and are not allocated to the Company's operating business segments.

Other general accounting policies are:

    Basis of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior years' amounts to conform to the current year presentation.

    Joint Ventures: The equity method is used to account for an investment a joint venture with Hilton Inns, Inc. which is not controlled by the Company. A joint venture with Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc. was divested in 2000 and a $5.2 million loss was recorded within Residential Home and Land Sales in connection with the divestiture and expenses incurred prior to the divestiture.

30


    Cash and Cash Equivalents: The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturity dates of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents.

    Income-Producing Properties; Property and Equipment: Property is stated at cost, less proceeds from sales of easements and rights of way. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the various assets without regard to salvage value. Lives used for calculating depreciation are as follows: buildings—25 to 40 years; equipment—3 to 10 years; water supply systems, orchards and other—5 to 75 years.

    Impairment of Assets: Long-lived assets and assets held for sale are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an impairment may have occurred. In 2000, an impairment loss of $4.9 million was recorded within Industrial and Commercial Sales on four office buildings held for sale which subsequently were sold. No impairment loss was recorded in 1999 or 1998.

    There is no depreciation expense recorded on assets held for sale. Income-Producing Properties Held for Sale avoided depreciation expense of $2.5 million for 2000. Revenues from operations of Income-Producing Properties Held for Sale continue to be reported with Commercial Operations—Income-Producing Properties in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. For 2000, revenues from such properties totaled $6.8 million.

    Environmental Matters: Environmental clean-up costs are charged to expense or established reserves when incurred and are not capitalized. Reserves are recorded for environmental clean-up costs when remediation efforts are probable and can be reasonably estimated. To date, environmental clean-up costs have not been material.

    Management's Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions. These affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of any contingent assets or liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from the estimates made.

    Income Taxes: The partnership is not a taxable entity; accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been made in the consolidated financial statements. Partners are taxed on their allocable share of the Company's earnings which is reportable on their income tax returns.

    The Revenue Act of 1987 contained provisions which, in some cases, taxes publicly traded partnerships as corporations. Beginning in 1998, 90% of the Partnership's gross income, as defined, must be derived from rent, sales of real estate, interest, and income from other "natural resources" as provided in Internal Revenue Section 7704. The Partnership's 2000, 1999 and 1998 gross income qualifies under this provision and the Company expects to continue to be taxed as a partnership for the foreseeable future.

31


    Amounts per Partnership Unit: The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted income net per unit computations:

(in 000's except per unit)

  Income
(numerator)

  Units
(denominator)

  Per Unit
 
For the year ended December 31, 2000                  
Net income per unit   $ 85,396   27,658   $ 3.09  
  Net income available to unitholders                  
Effect of dilutive securities                
  Unit options         311     (.04 )
   
 
 
 
Net income per unit—diluted   $ 85,396   27,969   $ 3.05  
   
 
 
 
For the year ended December 31, 1999                  
Net income per unit                  
  Net income available to unitholders   $ 90,392   31,388   $ 2.88  
Effect of dilutive securities                  
  Unit options       280     (.03 )
   
 
 
 
Net income per unit—diluted   $ 90,392   31,668   $ 2.85  
   
 
 
 
For the year ended December 31, 1998                  
Net income per unit                  
  Net income available to unitholders   $ 64,080   33,986   $ 1.89  
Effect of dilutive securities                  
  Unit options       390     (.03 )
   
 
 
 
Net income per unit—diluted   $ 64,080   34,376   $ 1.86  
   
 
 
 

Note 3. Federal Income Tax Results of the Partnership

    The Partnership has elected under Section 754 of the Internal Revenue Code to adjust the basis of property upon the purchase of units by investors. For investors who purchase units, this election provides for the reflection of the investor's price of the units in the tax basis of the Partnership's properties. The excess of the purchase price over the monetary assets and liabilities is allocated to real estate assets and results in a new basis which is used to calculate operating expenses for tax purposes.

    At December 31, 2000, the net tax basis of the Company's assets and liabilities exceeded the Company's consolidated financial statement basis of its assets and liabilities by $225,654,000. This excess amount does not reflect the step-up in asset basis allocated to individual partners upon purchase of units subsequent to the formation of the Partnership.

    The Partnership's tax returns for the past four years are subject to examination by federal and state taxing authorities. Because many types of transactions are susceptible to varying interpretations under federal and state income tax laws and regulations, the tax basis amounts may be subject to change at a later date upon final determination by the taxing authorities.

32


Note 4. Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments

    The estimated fair values of certain of the Company's financial instruments are as follows:

 
  December 31,
 
  2000
  1999
In thousands

  Carrying
Amount

  Fair
Value

  Carrying
Amount

  Fair
Value

Notes receivable from land sales   $ 10,470   $ 10,470   $ 50,585   $ 50,585
Mortgage and other debt     74,557     74,557     222,825     222,825
Advances from developers for utility construction     10,627     2,866     10,992     2,880
   
 
 
 

    The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:

    Cash and Cash Equivalents; Accounts Receivable and Payable: The carrying amounts approximate the fair values of these instruments due to their short-term nature.

    Notes Receivable from Land Sales: The carrying amounts of notes receivable approximate fair value. Generally, these notes are interest-bearing with maturities of less than one year from close of escrow. If applicable, the carrying amount reflects imputed interest to reduce the note receivable to its fair value.

    Mortgage and Other Debt: The carrying amount of the Company's debt approximates its fair value based on current interest rates available to the Company for comparable debt. See Note 7 for interest rates on outstanding debt.

    Advances from Developers for Utility Construction: Generally, advances are refundable to the developer without interest at the rate of 2.5% per year over 40 years. The fair value is estimated as the discounted value (12%) of the future cash flows to be paid on the advances.

33


Note 5. Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions

 
  December 31,
 
In thousands

  2000
  1999
 
Accounts and notes receivable              
  Trade receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,297 and $863, respectively   $ 1,588   $ 1,624  
  Notes receivable from land sales     10,470     50,585  
  Unbilled accounts receivable              
    Agriculture     647     3,188  
    Other     1,712     1,293  
  Other     2,737     4,877  
   
 
 
    $ 17,154   $ 61,567  
   
 
 
Land under development              
  Valencia              
    Residential development   $ 25,154   $ 4,532  
    Industrial and commercial land development     37,689     34,524  
  Agriculture     312     345  
   
 
 
    $ 63,155   $ 39,401  
   
 
 
Income-producing properties held for sale              
  Retail   $   $ 115,462  
  Office     8,503     36,545  
  Other     7,311     19,857  
   
 
 
      15,814     171,864  
  Accumulated depreciation     (3,094 )   (22,431 )
   
 
 
    $ 12,720   $ 149,433  
   
 
 
Income-producing properties              
  Land   $ 34,822   $ 21,399  
  Buildings     106,916     112,304  
  Other     10,468     14,498  
   
 
 
      152,206     148,201  
  Accumulated depreciation     (30,201 )   (25,478 )
   
 
 
      122,005     122,723  
  Properties under development     25,780     8,904  
   
 
 
    $ 147,785   $ 131,627  
   
 
 
Property and equipment              
  Land   $ 3,759   $ 3,759  
  Buildings     5,974     5,343  
  Equipment     9,470     9,311  
  Water supply systems, orchards and other     81,620     73,635  
  Construction in progress     5,545     5,111  
   
 
 
      106,368     97,159  
  Accumulated depreciation     (38,737 )   (35,841 )
   
 
 
    $ 67,631   $ 61,318  
   
 
 

34


 
  December 31,
In thousands

  2000
  1999
Other assets and deferred charges            
  Prepaid expenses   $ 2,583   $ 1,794
  Unamortized loan fees     1,190     841
  Deferred charges and assets of Valencia Water Company     4,516     4,767
  Other     8,247     7,200
   
 
    $ 16,536   $ 14,602
   
 
Accrued expenses            
  Deferred compensation   $ 12,898   $ 10,515
  Operating and other accruals     16,924     3,611
  Project accruals     19,566     27,681
  Lease obligation, net     10,803    
  Other     8,741     4,522
   
 
    $ 68,932   $ 46,329
   
 
Other liabilities            
  Warranty and other reserves   $ 6,089   $ 7,049
  Deferred taxes of Valencia Water Company     6,317     6,114
  Other     13,039     11,621
   
 
    $ 25,445   $ 24,784
   
 

Note 6. Commercial Leases

    As of December 31, 2000, minimum lease payments to be received under non-cancelable operating leases and a lease obligation to be paid in conjunction with the sale of four office buildings are as follows:

In thousands

  Lease
Obligation

  Lease
Receipts

 
2001   $ 1,597   $ 16,797  
2002     1,645     16,077  
2003     1,694     13,219  
2004     1,745     12,401  
2005     1,797     10,196  
Thereafter     15,322     73,788  
   
 
 
    $ 23,800   $ 142,478 *
   
 
 

*
Includes minimum lease payments from income-producing properties held for sale. The amount does not include contingent rentals which may be received under certain leases based on lessee sales or apartment rentals. Contingent and apartment rentals received for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998 were (in thousands) $15,778, $12,606 and $11,429, respectively.

35


Note 7. Mortgage and Other Debt

 
   
  December 31,
 
  Interest
Rates

In thousands

  2000
  1999
Unsecured lines of credit   Variable   $ 2,000   $ 64,400
Prudential (shopping center loans)   7.44 %   24,549     24,913
Prudential (ranch mortgage)   8.45 %   10,080     10,320
Pacific Life (Valencia Water Company)   8.00 %   11,000     11,000
Wells Fargo (Valencia Town Center)   7.94 %   12,000     35,000
Community facilities bonds (Valencia Town Center)   7.33 %*   14,928     15,583
Kaufman and Broad (City Ranch)   8.00 %       12,024
FHLMC (apartment mortgages)   6.51 %*       49,585
       
 
        $ 74,557   $ 222,825
       
 

*
Weighted-average rate

    In November 2000, the Company replaced its existing bank lines, totaling $159 million, with a $130 million three-year, unsecured line of credit from Wells Fargo and Bank of America. The interest rate is LIBOR plus 1.25%-1.45% and the commitment fee is .25% per annum of the unused portion. In addition, the Company has a $2 million line of credit with Valencia Bank & Trust on which the rate is LIBOR plus 1.35% and a $10 million line with Wells Fargo at LIBOR plus 1.25%-1.45%. Letters of credit outstanding against available lines of credit totaled $21.2 million and $21.0 million, respectively, at December 31, 2000 and 1999.

    In September 1999, the Company completed two financings totaling $25 million with Prudential Insurance Company of America. Each loan is secured by a retail shopping center and is due in seven years. Principal and interest are paid monthly and based on a 7.44% interest rate and 25-year amortization.

    The Prudential ranch mortgage is a non-recourse mortgage financing secured by the 14,000-acre New Columbia Ranch property. The terms of the note call for interest payments on each May 1 and November 1 and annual principal payments of $240,000 until maturity on November 1, 2003.

    Valencia Water Company has an $11 million financing with Pacific Life secured by the utility's property and equipment. The terms of the financing call for semi-annual interest payments with the principal payable in full at maturity on June 1, 2009. The loan is not guaranteed by the Company. Valencia Water Company also has a $2 million line of credit with Wells Fargo which is not guaranteed by the Company.

    In November 2000, a $50 million revolving mortgage facility secured by Valencia Town Center replaced a $40 million facility. The new facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.25% and matures in November 2001.

    In October 1992, tax-exempt community facilities bonds were issued to finance a portion of the costs of certain public infrastructure improvements located within or in the vicinity of Valencia Town Center, the Company's regional shopping mall. The bonds will be repaid over 20 years from special taxes levied on the mall property.

    In August 1999, a $12.0 million note was recorded in connection with the Company's City Ranch joint venture with Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc. The Company divested its interests in the joint venture in September 2000 and the note was cancelled.

36


    In March 1999, the Company replaced a $44.7 million portfolio mortgage secured by five commercial properties with three financings totaling $50 million secured by three apartment complexes. The loans were assumed by the buyer upon sale of the apartment complexes in December 2000.

    Annual maturities of existing long-term debt are approximately (in thousands) $13,362 in 2001, $3,481 in 2002, $10,970 in 2003, $1,509 in 2004, $1,657 in 2005 and $43,578 thereafter. The unsecured lines of credit have no scheduled repayment terms.

    Capitalized Interest and Interest Income: During 2000, 1999, and 1998, total interest expense incurred amounted to (in thousands) $20,622, $13,910 and $8,067, net of $329, $1,563 and $3,354, which was capitalized, respectively. Interest income from investments and notes receivable totaled (in thousands) $3,000 in 2000, $3,949 in 1999 and $1,451 in 1998.

Note 8. Employee Benefit Plans

    Incentive Compensation Plan: Under the terms of the Company's Executive Incentive Plan, the Board of Directors may authorize incentive compensation awards to key management personnel of up to 7% of income for 1999 and 2000 and 5% of income for 1998. The Board of Directors authorized awards of $4,728,000 (5.5%), $5,164,000 (5.7%) and $3,237,000 (5.0%) for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.

    Unit Compensation Plans: The Company has two unit-based compensation plans which are described below. The Company applies the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its plans. Accordingly, compensation expense is only recognized for market price fluctuations in connection with option appreciation rights under the unit option plan. Had compensation costs been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123, the Company's net income and net income per unit would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated on the following page:

 
  Years ended December 31,
In thousands, except per unit

  2000
  1999
  1998
Net Income                  
  As reported   $ 85,396   $ 90,392   $ 64,080
  Pro forma     81,050     86,168     60,227
Income Per Unit                  
  As reported—assuming dilution   $ 3.05   $ 2.85   $ 1.86
  Pro forma     2.90     2.72     1.75
   
 
 

    Unit Option Plan: In January 1995, the Board of Directors approved the 1995 Option/Award Plan, which superseded the Option, Appreciation Rights and Restricted Units Plan. Under the terms of the Plan, an additional 600,000 units may be granted as options, restricted units, unit rights or appreciation rights to key employees. In November 1997, the Plan was amended to increase the number of units which may be granted by 3,050,000 units.

    Options, restricted units or appreciation rights may not be granted at a price below the market price on date of grant. Non-qualified options and appreciation rights are exercisable 25% after the end of each of the first four years and terminate in ten years. The following non-qualified, market price options, all without appreciation rights, were granted: 2000—316,707; 1999—270,784; 1998—215,419. A recovery of $400,000 was recorded in 2000 and no expense or recovery was recorded in 1999 or 1998 for market price fluctuations in connection with option appreciation rights granted prior to 1992. Restricted unit rights granted as part of the Company's Management Unit Ownership Program vest 20% at the end of each of the first five years. The following restricted unit rights were granted: 2000—6,205; 1999—4,342; 1998—2,936.

37


    In November 1997, the Board of Directors approved a premium price option program for key executives tied to the performance of the Company's partnership units. Options totaling 2.45 million units were granted to key executives. The number of options granted was larger than the Company's typical market-price option program due to the increased risks associated with the premium price and forfeiture provisions and the fact that it was in lieu of market price options for the executives over the three-year period ended November 2000. Under the terms of the program, participants were granted options in two tranches, each of which had a five-year option life and was exercisable in three years but was subject to forfeiture if certain performance criteria were not met. The second tranche was cancelled in November 2000 because price objectives were not met. At December 31, 2000, 891,200 units from the first tranche of the 1997 grant with an exercise price of $31.30, were outstanding. In November 2000, a total of 490,000 premium price options with an exercise price of $28.00 were granted to key executives.

    The per unit weighted-average fair value of non-qualified, market price options granted in 2000, 1999 and 1998 was $9.35, $8.12 and $10.02, respectively, on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: 2000—distribution yield of 2.85%, expected volatility of 29.5%, risk-free interest rate of 6.06% and expected life of 10 years. 1999—distribution yield of 3.0%, expected volatility of 29.7%, risk-free interest rate of 6.0% and expected life of 10 years; 1998—distribution yield of 2.8%, expected volatility 29.4%, risk-free interest rate of 5.5% and an expected life of 10 years.

    The per unit weighted-average fair value of premium price options granted in 1997 was $3.53 for the first tranche and $3.82 for options granted in 2000 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: 1997 grant—distribution yield of 1.6%, expected volatility of 21.0%, risk-free interest rate of 6.4% expected life of five years; 2000 grant—distribution yield of 2.4% expected volatility of 23.3% risk-free interest rate of 6.1%, expected life of five years.

38


    At December 31, 2000, 1,132,201 units were available for future grants. A summary of the status of the Company's Option/Award Plan is presented below:

 
  Units
  Weighted Average
Exercise Price

Outstanding at December 31, 1997   3,739,683   $ 27.68
  Granted   218,355     30.03
  Exercised   (54,479 )   17.50
  Cancelled   (27,507 )   23.50
   
 
Outstanding at December 31, 1998   3,876,052     27.96
  Granted   275,126     24.14
  Exercised   (76,087 )   15.67
  Cancelled   (608,448 )   31.04
   
 
Outstanding at December 31, 1999   3,466,643     27.34
  Granted   812,912     27.58
  Exercised   (80,414 )   16.99
  Cancelled   (1,225,853 )   30.22
   
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2000   2,973,288   $ 25.42
   
 

    At December 31, 2000 and 1999, the number of options exercisable was 1,863,610 and 950,340, respectively, and the weighted-average exercise price of those options was $24.70 and $18.70, respectively.

    The following summarizes information about outstanding options at December 31, 2000:

Range of
Exercise Prices

  Number
Outstanding*

  Weighted-Average
Exercise Price

  Weighted-Average
Remaining Life

$13.00-$16.75   562,675   $ 14.92   3.9
$19.75-$26.94   840,685   $ 24.15   7.5
$28.00-$33.39   1,555,550   $ 30.12   3.4

*Excludes 14,378 restricted units granted as part of the Company's Management Unit Ownership Program

    The following summarizes information about exercisable options at December 31, 2000:

Range of
Exercise Prices

  Number
Exercisable

  Weighted-Average
Exercise Price

   
$13.00-$16.75   562,675   $ 14.92    
$19.75-$26.94   318,635   $ 21.97    
$28.00-$33.39   982,300   $ 31.19    

    Employee Unit Purchase Plan: Under the terms of the Employee Unit Purchase Plan, employees may have up to 15% of their base salary withheld to purchase the Company's partnership units. The purchase price is a specified percentage (no less than 85% and no more than 100%, as determined by the Plan Administrator for each purchase period) of the lower of the market price on the first day of the purchase period or the last day of the purchase period. At December 31, 2000, a total of 210,033 units is available for future issuance under the plan.

    Under the plan, the Company sold 8,922, 9,996 and 6,965 units to employees in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The weighted-average fair value of the purchase discount was $1.63 for 2000, $2.33 for 1999 and $3.64 for 1998, using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions: expected life of seven months due to salary withholdings throughout the year; distribution yield of 2.3% and

39


expected volatility of 24.1% for 2000, distribution yield of 2.2% and expected volatility of 29.4% for 1999 and distribution yield of 3.0% and expected volatility of 20.6% for 1998; risk-free interest rate of 4.39% for 2000, 4.54% for 1999 and 5.45% for 1998; and an exercise price equal to 85% of the lower of the market price on the first day of the purchase period and the market price on the last day of the purchase period.

    Retirement Plans: The Retirement Plan is a defined benefit plan that is Company funded and qualified under ERISA. Generally, all employees of the Company and subsidiaries of the Company are eligible to participate in the Retirement Plan after one year of employment and attainment of age 21. Participants' benefits accumulated through December 31, 1996 are calculated as 40.5% of the highest average annual earnings up to Social Security covered compensation, plus 60% of average annual earnings in excess of covered compensation, reduced pro rata for years of service less than 30. Benefits which accumulate after January 1, 1997 are calculated as 32.4% of the Social Security wage base and 48% of the excess over covered compensation.

    The Company's contribution to the Retirement Plan is determined by consulting actuaries on the basis of customary actuarial considerations, including total covered payroll of participants, benefits paid, earnings and appreciation in the Retirement Plan funds.

    The Board of Directors has adopted a Pension Restoration Plan, pursuant to which the Company will pay any difference between the maximum amount payable under ERISA and the amount otherwise payable under the Plan.

    The Company's funding policy is to contribute no more than the maximum tax-deductible amount. Plan assets are invested primarily in equity and fixed income funds.

    The cost of the Company's Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and a Retirement Plan for Directors who were retired prior to the termination of the plan in 1997 was $109,000 in 2000, $105,000 in 1999 and $106,000 in 1998.

    The following table sets forth the plans' funded status and amounts recognized in the Company's consolidated financial statements for the Retirement and the Pension Restoration Plans:

 
  December 31,
 
In thousands

  2000
  1999
 
Change in Benefit Obligation              
Projected benefit obligation, beginning of year:   $ 23,809   $ 23,961  
  Service cost     677     837  
  Interest cost     1,715     1,505  
  Benefits paid     (1,079 )   (2,738 )
  Actuarial loss     3,704     244  
   
 
 
Projected benefit obligation, end of year   $ 28,826   $ 23,809  
   
 
 
Change in Plan Assets              
Plan assets, beginning of year:   $ 19,502   $ 19,134  
  Actual return on plan assets     2,477     3,006  
  Employer contribution     1     100  
  Benefits paid     (1,079 )   (2,738 )
   
 
 
Plan assets, end of year   $ 20,901   $ 19,502  
   
 
 
Funded status   $ (7,925 ) $ (4,307 )
Unrecognized transition obligation         (34 )
Unrecognized prior service cost     686     777  
Unrecognized loss (gain)     2,300     (537 )
   
 
 
Net amount recognized—accrued benefit cost   $ (4,939 ) $ (4,101 )
   
 
 

40


 
  December 31,
 
In thousands

  2000
  1999
  1998
 
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost                    
  Service cost   $ 677   $ 838   $ 685  
  Interest cost     1,715     1,505     1,370  
  Expected return on plan assets     (1,671 )   (1,650 )   (1,643 )
  Amortization of unrecognized transition obligation     (34 )   (34 )   (34 )
  Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost     92     92     92  
  Amortization of unrecognized loss (gain)     60     105     (74 )
   
 
 
 
  Pension expense   $ 839   $ 856   $ 396  
   
 
 
 

    The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) and fair value of assets for the plan with assets less than ABO (Pension Restoration Plan) were $11,101,624, $3,668,964 and $0 at December 31, 2000 and $6,757,549, $2,175,646, and $0, respectively at December 31, 1999.

 
  December 31,
 
 
  2000
  1999
 
The assumptions used in the accounting were:          
  Discount rate   7.75 % 7.50 %
  Rate of increase in compensation levels   5.00 % 5.00 %
  Expected long-term return of assets   9.00 % 9.00 %

    Employee Savings Plan: The Company has an Employee Savings Plan which is available to all eligible employees. Certain employee contributions may be supplemented by Company contributions. Company contributions approximated $451,000 in 2000, $438,000 in 1999 and $371,000 in 1998.

    Deferred Cash Bonus Plan: In February 1991, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors awarded deferred bonuses payable January 15, 1999. The amount paid was based upon the relative percentage return on the market value of the Company's depositary units compared to the percentage return on the Standard and Poor's 500 Index over a nine-year period. A total of $176,500 was earned and paid in 1999 under this program.

    Other Benefits: The Company does not provide postretirement or postemployment benefits other than those plans described above and, as such, there is no obligation to be recognized under SFAS Nos. 106 and 112.

Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies

    The Company is involved in litigation and various claims, including those arising from its ordinary conduct of business. Management is of the opinion that the ultimate liability from this litigation will not materially affect the Company's consolidated financial condition. The Company believes it has adequate insurance to protect itself against any future material property and casualty losses in excess of established reserves.

    In the ordinary course of business, and as part of the entitlement and development process, the Company is required to provide performance bonds to the County of Los Angeles and the City of Santa Clarita to assure completion of certain public facilities. At December 31, 2000, the Company had performance bonds outstanding totaling approximately $155 million.

    As a significant landowner, developer and holder of commercial properties, there exists the possibility that environmental contamination conditions may exist that would require the Company to take corrective action. The Company believes such costs will not materially affect the Company's consolidated financial condition.

41


Note 10. Business Segment Reporting

    In accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 131—Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, the Company's reportable business segments and respective accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 2—Business Segments and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Management evaluates segment performance based primarily on revenues before property sales and contribution to income before property sales and allocation of incentive compensation. Interest income and expenses are evaluated and reported on a consolidated net basis and are not allocated to the Company's business segments.

    The following table provides financial information regarding management's measures of the Company's business segments and other significant items and also provides a reconciliation to the Company's consolidated totals:

 
  Year Ended December 31, 2000
In thousands

  Revenues
  Contribution
to Income

  Depreciation and
Amortization

  Assets
  Capital
Expenditures

Real Estate                              
  Residential   $ 27,210   $ 4,335   $ 120   $ 12,702   $
  Industrial and commercial     295,119     99,475     6     80,908    
  Community development         (10,799 )   70     30,557     64
  Income-producing properties     58,219     22,752     10,475     141,477     27,441
  Valencia Water Company     13,132     3,633 (a)   2,247     66,539     8,974
Agriculture     7,288     1,115     477     6,510     220
Central administration         (12,180 )   405     13,015     411
   
 
 
 
 
      400,968     108,331     13,800     351,708     37,110
Interest and other expense, net         (17,935 )          
All other         (5,000 )          
   
 
 
 
 
Total   $ 400,968   $ 85,396   $ 13,800   $ 351,708   $ 37,110
   
 
 
 
 

42


 
  Year Ended December 31, 1999
In thousands

  Revenues
  Contribution
to Income

  Depreciation and
Amortization

  Assets
  Capital
Expenditures

Real Estate                              
  Residential   $ 109,608   $ 38,424   $ 116   $ 27,505   $
  Industrial and commercial     109,200     42,104     10     116,666     10,546
  Community development         (11,597 )   66     19,725     138
  Income-producing properties     50,459     17,307     12,127     253,214     57,442
  Valencia Water Company     12,202     3,200 (a)   2,017     60,272     7,437
Agriculture     41,037     28,715     613     17,541     586
Central administration         (11,371 )   347     9,901     511
   
 
 
 
 
      322,506     106,782     15,296     504,824     76,660
Interest and other expense, net         (10,390 )          
All other         (6,000 )          
   
 
 
 
 
Total   $ 322,506   $ 90,392   $ 15,296   $ 504,824   $ 76,660
   
 
 
 
 
 
  Year Ended December 31, 1998
In thousands

  Revenues
  Contribution
to Income

  Depreciation and
Amortization

  Assets
  Capital
Expenditures

Real Estate                              
  Residential   $ 70,867   $ 23,999   $ 37   $ 16,320   $ 494
  Industrial and commercial     172,320     49,248     14     170,493     4,610
  Community development         (10,047 )   43     17,278     67
  Income-producing properties     38,622     17,754     7,277     147,216     97,419
  Valencia Water Company     10,209     2,889 (a)   1,956     53,719     7,587
Agriculture     12,660     2,196     594     17,048     190
Central administration         (10,879 )   180     10,133     555
   
 
 
 
 
      304,678     75,160     10,101     432,207     110,922
Interest and other expense, net         (7,180 )          
All other         (3,900 )          
   
 
 
 
 
Total   $ 304,678   $ 64,080   $ 10,101   $ 432,207   $ 110,922
   
 
 
 
 

    All of the Company's real estate operations are conducted on the Company's properties in north Los Angeles County. Agricultural operations are conducted on the Company's properties in Southern and Central California. Accordingly, financial information based on geographic area is not presented.

    Sales by business segment to individual customers representing more than 10% of the Company's consolidated revenues are as follows:

In thousands

  2000
  1999
  1998
Industrial and Commercial   $ 201,251     $ 111,000

(a)
Includes income tax expense of (in thousands) $1,847 in 2000, $1,463 in 1999 and $1,071 in 1998.

43


Note 11. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

    Quarterly financial information for the Company fluctuates due to the uneven nature of real estate closing activity and the skewing of results by individual large sales. The following is a summary of selected quarterly financial data for 2000 and 1999:

 
  Quarter
In thousands,
except per unit

  First
  Second
  Third
  Fourth
Revenues                        
  2000   $ 28,364   $ 55,319   $ 46,470   $ 270,815
  1999     42,273     63,038     73,204     143,991
   
 
 
 
Operating income                        
  2000   $ 8,860   $ 12,923   $ 6,981   $ 89,209
  1999     13,355     18,660     18,233     64,965
   
 
 
 
Net income (loss)                        
  2000   $ 3,197   $ 6,348   $ (612 ) $ 76,463
  1999     8,283     12,723     11,897     57,489
Net income (loss) per unit*                        
  2000   $ .11   $ .23   $ (.02 ) $ 2.85
  1999     .26     .40     .38     1.91
   
 
 
 
Net income (loss) per unit—assuming dilution*                        
  2000   $ .11   $ .22   $ (.02 ) $ 2.83
  1999     .25     .40     .38     1.89
   
 
 
 

*Due to unit repurchases during the year, quarterly per unit amounts do not add up to the total per unit for the year.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

    None

44


PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Company

    The Partnership was reorganized from a corporation to a California limited partnership on January 8, 1985. The general partners of the Partnership are Newhall Management Limited Partnership and Newhall General Partnership. Two executive officers and Newhall Management Limited Partnership are the general partners of Newhall General Partnership. Newhall Management Corporation and Newhall General Partnership are the general partners of the Newhall Management Limited Partnership.

    Newhall Management Limited Partnership has exclusive management and control of the affairs of the Partnership and shares in Partnership income and losses on the basis of the number of Partnership units owned by it. Newhall Management Corporation is the managing general partner of Newhall Management Limited Partnership, and makes all decisions and takes all action deemed by it necessary or appropriate to conduct the business and affairs of Newhall Management Limited Partnership and, therefore, of the Partnership.

    The duties and responsibilities of directors are carried out by the Board of Directors of Newhall Management Corporation. Each voting shareholder of Newhall Management Corporation also is a director of Newhall Management Corporation ("Corporation") and only voting shareholders may be directors of the Corporation. Every voting shareholder and director has a number of votes in all matters equal to the number of votes of every other voting shareholder and director. Upon ceasing to be a director, a shareholder may be a nonvoting shareholder for a period of time prior to the repurchase of his or her shares by the Corporation. See further discussion of the shareholders' agreement and voting trust agreement below.

    The shareholder-directors of Newhall Management Corporation are as follows:

    Thomas L. Lee, age 58, was appointed Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation upon its formation in November 1990 and of the former managing general partner in 1989. He joined the predecessor corporation in 1970 and has served in various executive capacities. Mr. Lee was elected as a director in 1985. In January 2001, Mr. Lee announced his retirement as Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation effective March 21, 2001, as Chairman effective March 31, 2001 and that he will not stand for re-election as a director in July 2001. He is a director of Blue Shield of California and a trustee of California Institute of the Arts.

    George L. Argyros, age 64, was elected a director of the Corporation in September 1995. He has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Arnel & Affiliates, an investment company, since 1968. He is a director of DST Systems, Tecstar, The First American Corporation, Doskocil, Inc., and Rockwell International. He is a trustee of the California Institute of Technology and Chairman of the Horatio Alger Association.

    Gary M. Cusumano, age 57, was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation on March 21, 2001, and has previously served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Corporation and the former managing general partner since 1989. Mr. Cusumano was elected a director of the Corporation in July 1995. Mr. Cusumano is a director of Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital and the California Chamber of Commerce.

    Thomas V. McKernan, Jr., age 56, has been a director of the Corporation since September 1994. Mr. McKernan has been President and Chief Executive Officer of the Automobile Club of Southern California since 1991. He is a director of Blue Shield of California, the American Automobile Association, Payden & Rygel Investment Group, Forest Lawn Memorial Park, California Chamber of

45


Commerce, Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce, Orthopaedic Hospital, California Business Roundtable, Los Angeles Police Foundation and Education Foundation of Los Angeles Archdiocese.

    Henry K. Newhall, age 62, has served as a director of the Corporation, the former managing general partner and the predecessor corporation, respectively, since 1982. Dr. Newhall retired in August 1998 as General Manager, Technology, Oronite Additives Division of Chevron Chemical Company. He has served in various managerial and consulting positions with Chevron since 1971.

    Jane Newhall, age 87, has served as a director of the Corporation, the former managing general partner and the predecessor corporation, respectively, since 1960. Ms. Newhall, a private investor, is a director of the Henry Mayo Newhall Foundation. She is a life trustee of Mills College, the San Francisco Theological Seminary, and the Graduate Theological Union.

    Peter T. Pope, age 66, was elected a director of the Corporation in 1992. Mr. Pope served as Chairman of Pope & Talbot, Inc. from 1990 to August 2000 and as Chief Executive Officer from 1990 until his retirement in August 1999. He is a director and general partner of Pope Resources, and a director of Pope & Talbot, Inc.

    Carl E. Reichardt, age 69, has served as a director of the Corporation, the former managing general partner and the predecessor corporation, respectively, since 1980. Mr. Reichardt was Chairman of the Board of Directors of Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., from 1983 until December 1994 and a director until April 1998. He is a director of Ford Motor Company, HCA—The Healthcare Company, PG&E Corporation, ConAgra, Inc., McKesson HBOC, Inc. and HSBC Holdings PLC.

    Thomas C. Sutton, age 58, was elected a director of the Corporation in November 1991. He has been Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Life Insurance Company since 1990. Mr. Sutton is a director of Southern California Edison, The Irvine Company, Association of California Life Insurance Companies and American Council of Life Insurance. He is a trustee of the Committee for Economic Development.

    Barry Lawson Williams, age 56, was elected a director of the Corporation in July 1996. Mr. Williams has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of The American Management Association International since November 2000. Mr. Williams also has been President of Williams Pacific Ventures, Inc., a venture capital consulting and business mediation firm that he founded, and a general partner of WDG Ventures Ltd., a real estate development fund, since 1987. Mr. Williams is a director of PG&E Corporation, CH2M Hill, Ltd., Simpson Manufacturing Company, R.H. Donnelly & Co., USA Education, Inc., Synavant Inc. and Kaiser Permanente. He is a trustee of Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company.

    Ezra K. Zilkha, age 75, has served as a director of the Corporation, the former managing general partner and the predecessor corporation, respectively, since 1977. Since 1956, Mr. Zilkha has been President of Zilkha & Sons, Inc., a private investment company. From 1991 to 1993 he was Chairman of Union Holdings, Inc., an industrial holding company. He is a director of the International Center for the Disabled and Heartland Technology, Inc. Mr. Zilkha is a trustee of The American Society of the French Legion of Honor, trustee emeritus of Wesleyan University and an honorary trustee of the Brookings Institution.

    Each of the shareholder-directors may be contacted at the principal executive offices of the Partnership and is a citizen of the United States.

    The Board of Directors manages and controls the overall business and affairs of the Corporation, of Newhall Management Limited Partnership, and of the Partnership. The members of the Board of

46


Directors are elected by the shareholder-directors of the Corporation, unless there is a vacancy on the Board in which case the remaining board members may fill the vacancy, without the approval of the limited partners and with each shareholder-director of the Corporation having an equal number of votes. Because the shareholders and directors are the same persons, it is expected that the shareholders will re-elect themselves to serve as directors.

    It is the current policy of the Corporation that all directors of the Corporation, except for the initial directors of the former managing general partner, will retire at age 70. If a new director is elected, he or she is required to become a shareholder by purchasing the number of shares determined by the Board of Directors.

    The limited partnership agreement (the "Partnership Agreement") of the Partnership requires the general partners to own at least one percent (1%) of the total number of Partnership units outstanding at all times. In order to meet this 1% requirement, the shareholder-directors had originally contributed Partnership units as capital to the former managing general partner. The determination as to how many Partnership units each shareholder-director would contribute was based upon the shareholdings of the shareholder-director in the predecessor corporation and his or her ability to contribute such Partnership units in order that the general partners would own at least 1% of the total number of Partnership units outstanding at all times.

    Messrs. Henry Newhall and Zilkha each effectively have contributed to Newhall Management Limited Partnership a total of 72,000 Partnership units. Ms. Newhall effectively has contributed to Newhall Management Limited Partnership a total of 71,650 Partnership units. Messrs. Lee and Cusumano each effectively has contributed 66,020 Partnership units. Messrs. Argyros, Reichardt, Pope, Sutton, McKernan and Williams each effectively has contributed to Newhall Management Limited Partnership a total of 2,000 Partnership units. The Partnership units contributed to Newhall Management Limited Partnership total 359,690 or 1.35% of the total number of Partnership units outstanding at December 31, 2000.

    A unitholder will receive the same distributions from the Partnership with regard to his or her Partnership units regardless of whether such Partnership units are represented by limited partner interests in Newhall Management Limited Partnership or by general partner interests in Newhall Management Limited Partnership (which in turn are represented by common stock in the Corporation). All Partnership distributions and allocations to Newhall Management Limited Partnership with respect to the Partnership units held by such partner will be passed on to each limited partner of Newhall Management Limited Partnership or shareholder of the Corporation as distributions in proportion to the actual number of units or shares beneficially owned by such limited partner or shareholder, as the case may be.

    The shareholder-directors of the Corporation and the Corporation are parties to a shareholders' agreement and a voting trust agreement. These agreements provided for the transfer of all the shares of Newhall Management Corporation to a voting trust, held in the name of the Trustee. The Secretary of Newhall Management Corporation serves as Trustee. In all matters the Trustee will vote all the shares in accordance with the direction of a majority of the shareholder-directors, with each shareholder-director having one vote on each matter (irrespective of the actual number of shares beneficially owned by such person).

    The shareholders' agreement and the bylaws of the Corporation restrict the ability of a shareholder-director to transfer ownership of shares of the Corporation. Certain events, such as failure to own at least one limited partner unit in Newhall Management Limited Partnership, failure to consent to a Subchapter S election under the Internal Revenue Code, failure to re-execute the trust

47


agreement, ceasing to serve as a director, failure of a shareholder-director's spouse to sign any required consent, a material breach by a shareholder-director of the shareholders' agreement or voting trust agreement, a levy upon the shares of a shareholder, or a purported transfer of shares to someone other than a new or existing director upon approval of the Board of Directors, are considered to be repurchase events. Upon such a repurchase event, the shareholder must immediately resign as a director and the shareholder will lose voting rights under the voting trust agreement. Upon the occurrence of a repurchase event, a shareholder's shares will be repurchased by the Corporation or the Corporation may direct their purchase by a successor director. The Corporation has agreed to repurchase for cash equal to the market value of the Partnership units representing such shares (or provide for the purchase of) all shares of a shareholder-director subject to a repurchase event within one year of the repurchase event and to use its best efforts to effect such repurchase (purchase) as soon as possible after the repurchase event. There can be no assurance that the Corporation will be able to find a replacement for a departing shareholder-director who will purchase shares.

    The shareholders' agreement expires if Newhall Management Corporation ceases to serve as the managing general partner of the managing general partner of the Partnership, or Newhall Management Limited Partnership ceases to be the managing general partner of the Partnership, if all parties to the shareholders' agreement consent to its termination, or with respect to any individual shareholder, upon the repurchase of all the shareholder's shares.

    The term of the voting trust is limited by law to 10 years, but a party to the voting trust will be deemed to have resigned as a director of the Corporation and will have to sell his shares, subject to repurchase by the Corporation, unless, at the times provided in the voting trust agreement, the party re-executes and renews the voting trust for the purpose of keeping it continually in effect. In July 2000, the shareholder-directors renewed the voting trust agreement for an additional 10 years. The voting trust agreement terminates if Newhall Management Corporation ceases to serve as a general partner of the managing general partner of the Partnership, or Newhall Management Limited Partnership ceases to be the managing general partner of the Partnership, or with respect to any individual shareholder if a shareholder no longer owns any shares.

    The shareholder-directors, as limited partners, are also parties to the limited partnership agreement of Newhall Management Limited Partnership. The limited partnership agreement has restrictions on transfer similar to the shareholders' agreement and provides for repurchase of the limited partnership units of a limited partner upon the occurrence of repurchase events which are similar to those of the shareholders' agreement, including the cessation of being a director by a limited partner in the case of a limited partner who is a director.

    Upon the occurrence of a repurchase event, Newhall Management Limited Partnership would have one full year to transfer Partnership units representing the limited partner's interest to the limited partner. A limited partner could not compel the return of Partnership units for at least one year from the date a limited partner chooses to obtain return of Partnership units. Even then, Newhall Management Limited Partnership cannot, and cannot be compelled to, distribute Partnership units to the limited partner if Newhall Management Limited Partnership would thereafter own less than 1% of the Partnership's Partnership units.

    The limited partners, as limited partners, have no voting rights except as expressly set forth in the limited partnership agreement or granted pursuant to law. Such voting privileges include matters such as (i) electing general partners in specified instances, (ii) amending the limited partnership agreement, (iii) dissolving the limited partnership, (iv) electing a general partner to serve as the managing general partner, and (v) removing a general partner. Items (ii) and (iii) require the separate concurrence of the Corporation.

48


    Persons other than directors of Newhall Management Corporation may serve as limited partners of Newhall Management Limited Partnership and Newhall Management Corporation has the authority pursuant to the limited partnership agreement to cause additional units to be issued. The limited partnership agreement provides limited instances in which a general partner shall cease to be a general partner.

    Newhall Management Limited Partnership will dissolve (i) when a general partner ceases to be a general partner (other than by removal) unless there is at least one other general partner or all partners agree in writing to continue the business of the partnership and to admit one or more general partners, (ii) if Newhall Management Limited Partnership becomes insolvent, (iii) upon the disposition of substantially all assets of Newhall Management Limited Partnership, (iv) 90 days after an affirmative vote of the limited partners to dissolve pursuant to the partnership agreement, or (v) upon the occurrence of any event which makes it unlawful for the business of Newhall Management Limited Partnership to be continued.

    Newhall General Partnership, a California general partnership, is a general partner for the purposes of continuing the business of the Partnership and serving as an interim managing general partner if Newhall Management Limited Partnership or its successor ceases to serve as managing general partner. So long as Newhall Management Limited Partnership or its successor remains as managing general partner, Newhall General Partnership will have no right to take part in the management and control of the affairs of the Partnership.

    The general partners of Newhall General Partnership are Newhall Management Limited Partnership, the chief executive officer of Newhall Management Corporation and another officer or director of Newhall Management Corporation selected from time to time by the board of directors of Newhall Management Corporation. Thomas L. Lee and Gary Cusumano are general partners of Newhall General Partnership. For as long as Newhall Management Limited Partnership serves as a general partner of the Partnership, Newhall Management Limited Partnership shall serve as a general partner of Newhall General Partnership and the individual general partners of Newhall General Partnership shall be the chief executive officer of Newhall Management Corporation and another officer or director selected by the board of directors of Newhall Management Corporation.

    The managing partner of Newhall General Partnership is the chief executive officer of Newhall Management Corporation and shall have management and control of the ordinary course of day-to-day business of Newhall General Partnership. Matters outside the ordinary course of the day to day business of Newhall General Partnership shall be decided by a majority vote of the partners except that a unanimous vote will be required to, among other things, admit a new partner (other than the chief executive officer or other officer or director of Newhall Management Corporation).

    After giving effect to 2-for-1 unit splits on December 20, 1985 and January 29, 1990, each of the partners of Newhall General Partnership have contributed twenty Partnership units to Newhall General Partnership. No additional capital contributions are required. The income, losses and distributions allocated to Newhall General Partnership with respect to the units will be allocated among the partners of Newhall General Partnership in the ratio of the units contributed by each of them.

    The ability of a partner to withdraw from Newhall General Partnership or to transfer an interest in Newhall General Partnership is limited by the partnership agreement of Newhall General Partnership. Individual partners of Newhall General Partnership may not withdraw except upon appointment of a successor by the board of directors of Newhall Management Corporation. In addition, an individual general partner may not transfer his interest in Newhall General Partnership except with the written consent of Newhall Management Limited Partnership. Newhall Management Limited Partnership, as a

49


general partner of Newhall General Partnership, may not withdraw unless: (i) it no longer serves as a general partner of the Partnership; (ii) Newhall General Partnership no longer serves as a general partner of the Partnership; or (iii) Newhall General Partnership dissolves and its business is not continued.

    If Newhall Management Limited Partnership no longer serves as a general partner of the Partnership, simultaneously, it will stop serving as a general partner of Newhall General Partnership. Any individual general partner of Newhall General Partnership who is serving as a general partner by virtue of holding an office or position with Newhall Management Corporation, will stop serving as a general partner of Newhall General Partnership if either (i) Newhall Management Limited Partnership is replaced as a general partner of the Partnership, or (ii) Newhall Management Limited Partnership is no longer a general partner of Newhall General Partnership and individual partners are designated pursuant to the partnership agreement.

    Newhall General Partnership will dissolve when the Partnership is dissolved, liquidated and wound up and any trust or other entity formed for the purpose of liquidating or winding up the Partnership is liquidated and wound up. Newhall General Partnership will dissolve earlier upon: (i) the distribution of substantially all of its property; (ii) the unanimous agreement of its partners; (iii) ceasing to serve as a general partner of the Partnership; or (iv) the occurrence of an event which would make it unlawful to conduct its business.

    The Partnership Agreement requires the Partnership to pay all of the costs and expenses incurred or accrued by the general partners in connection with the business and affairs of the Partnership as the managing general partner in its sole discretion authorizes or approves from time to time. These costs and expenses include overhead and operating expenses, officer, employee, director and general partner compensation and other employee benefits paid by the general partners. Such compensation and benefits may be determined and changed from time to time without the approval of the limited partners.

50


Executive Officers of the Corporation

  Age
  Date of
Office

Thomas L. Lee
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
  58  
07/89-03/01

Gary M. Cusumano
President and Chief Executive Officer
President and Chief Operating Officer

 

57

 


03/01
07/89

Thomas E. Dierckman
Senior Vice President—Valencia Division
Senior Vice President—Commercial and Industrial, Valencia Division

 

52

 


03/01
09/94

Stuart R. Mork
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

48

 


01/96
01/95

Stephen C. Schmidt
Senior Vice President—Residential Community Development
Self-Employed Investor

 

52

 


09/99
1992-9/99

Daniel N. Bryant
Vice President—Asset Management
Director—Asset Management
Director—Property Management and Leasing

 

41

 


01/98
07/96
12/94

Kevin C. Farr
Vice President—Residential, Valencia Division
Executive Vice President—Valencia Company
Sr. Vice President—Valencia Company
Sr. Vice President/Controller—Valencia Company
Controller—Residential Division

 

40

 


01/01
09/99
03/98
12/96
12/95

Donald L. Kimball
Vice President—Finance and Controller
Vice President—Controller

 

43

 


01/97
07/94

Margaret M. Lauffer
Vice President—Marketing and Communications
Vice President—Corporate Communications

 

41

 


12/00
12/94

Ross J. Pistone
Vice President—Operations
Sr. Vice President—Valencia Company

 

45

 


01/98
12/95

Steven D. Zimmer
Vice President—Newhall Ranch Division
Partner—Rupp, Holmberg & Zimmer

 

56

 


07/99
1992-07/99

    The officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.

51


Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

    Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Corporation's executive officers and directors, the general partners, and persons who own more than ten percent of the Company's Partnership units, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company assists its executive officers, directors and general partners to file their Section 16(a) reports and retains a copy of the forms filed. Based upon our review of copies of the reports and on written statements from our executive officers, directors and general partners, the Company believes that all such forms were filed on a timely basis by the executive officers, directors and general partners during 2000, except that 1) an amended Form 5 for Ms. Jane Newhall was filed in May 2000 to report a gift of Partnership units made in December 1999; and 2) automatic conversions during 2000 of "phantom" unit rights into Partnership units under the Company's management unit ownership program were reported late on a Form 5 filed in February 2001 for Messrs. Thomas E. Dierckman and Stuart R. Mork.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

    The following tables set forth information as to each of the five highest paid Executive Officers and their compensation for services rendered to the Company and its subsidiaries:

Summary Compensation Table

 
   
   
   
   
  Long Term Compensation
   
 
   
  Annual Compensation
  Awards
  Payouts
   
Name and
Principal Position

  Year
  Salary
  Bonus
(1)

  Other
Annual
Comp.
(2)

  Restricted
Stock
Awards
(3)

  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options/SARs

  LTIP
Payouts
(4)

  All
Other
Comp.
(5)

Thomas L. Lee
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
  2000
1999
1998
  $

440,000
440,000
362,000
  $

727,500
930,600
430,364
  $

63,550
61,425
64,343
 

  230,000

  $



56,739
  $

79,657
52,795
38,824

Gary M. Cusumano
President and
Chief Operating Officer

 

2000
1999
1998

 

 

336,000
336,000
274,000

 

 

543,200
704,880
320,078

 

 

66,500
66,980
68,365

 




 

100,000


 

 



44,130

 

 

61,462
43,506
31,240

Thomas E. Dierckman
Senior Vice President

 

2000
1999
1998

 

 

271,000
226,000
226,000

 

 

286,650
256,396
169,197

 

 

6,050
5,250
4,300

 




 

80,000


 

 



37,826

 

 

26,070
20,278
19,541

Stuart R. Mork
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

 

2000
1999
1998

 

 

275,000
230,000
230,000

 

 

254,150
239,890
154,410

 

 

600
560
425

 




 

80,000


 

 



12,609

 

 

23,536
18,614
15,580

Stephen C. Schmidt
Senior Vice President(6)

 

2000
1999

 

 

200,000
52,308

 

 

136,850
48,615

 

 



 



 

16,000

 

 



 

 

12,168

(1)
Represents bonus accrued during the current calendar year based on earnings for such period and paid in the subsequent calendar year. A part of the 2000 bonus was paid in partnership units in accordance with the Company's Management Unit Ownership Program as follows: Mr. Lee ($363,750); Mr. Cusumano ($271,600); Mr. Dierckman ($106,650); Mr. Mork ($54,150). Part of the 1999 and 1998 bonuses were paid in partnership units as follows: Mr. Dierckman (1999—$51,279; 1998—$58,299); Mr. Mork (1999—$97,190; 1998—$54,450) and Mr. Schmidt 1999—($24,307).

52


(2)
Includes general partner fees paid to Messrs. Lee and Cusumano as general partners of Newhall General Partnership of $60,000 each, director fees of $4,500 each to Messrs. Cusumano and Dierckman as directors of a wholly-owned subsidiary and the balance are tax preparation/estate planning fees.

(3)
Messrs. Lee, Cusumano, Dierckman, Mork and Schmidt have received 1,406, 593, 2,783, 2,383, and 209 unit rights, respectively, which entitles them to receive one partnership unit for each unit right under certain circumstances.

(4)
Represents deferred cash bonus granted in July 1990 and earned as of December 31, 1998.

(5)
Totals include the following: (a) Company matching contributions to the Employee Savings Plan and Savings Restoration Plan, (b) excess life insurance premiums, and (c) long-term disability insurance premiums for Messrs. Lee and Cusumano.

(6)
Hired September 1999

53


Option / SAR Grants in Last Fiscal Year

 
   
   
   
   
  Value of Options as
of Grant Date as
Computed by the
Modified
Black-Scholes
Options Valuation
Model (3)

 
  Individual Grants
Name

  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options/SARs
Granted

  % of Total
Options/SARs
Granted To
Employees in
Fiscal Year

  Exercise
Or Base
Price
($/Sh)

  Expiration
Date

Thomas L. Lee   230,000 (1) 29 % $ 28.00   11-14-05   $ 878,600

Gary M. Cusumano

 

100,000

(1)

12

%

 

28.00

 

11-14-05

 

 

382,000

Thomas E. Dierckman

 

80,000

(1)

10

%

 

28.00

 

11-14-05

 

 

305,600

Stuart R. Mork

 

80,000

(1)

10

%

 

28.00

 

11-14-05

 

 

305,600

Stephen C. Schmidt

 

16,000

(2)

2

%

 

26.94

 

7-18-10

 

 

149,600

(1)
Premium price options granted in November 2000. The options vest at a rate of 331/3% per year commencing on the first anniversary date of the grant and expire five years following the grant date.

(2)
Non-qualified options without appreciation rights granted at 100% of fair market value on the date of grant. Options are exercisable 25% at the end of each of the first four years following date of grant and expire ten years after date of grant.

(3)
The modified Black-Scholes Options Valuation Model modifies the Black-Scholes formula to include the impact of distributions and to allow option exercise prior to maturity. A distribution yield of 2.4% was used in the model.

Aggregated Option/SAR Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option/SAR Values

 
   
   
  Number of
Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options/SARs
at Fiscal Year-End

   
   
 
   
   
  Value of Unexercised
In-the-Money Options/SARs
at Fiscal Year-End(1)

 
  Shares
Acquired
On
Exercise
(#)

   
Name

  Value
Realized

  Exercisable
  Un -
exercisable

  Exercisable
  Un -
exercisable

Thomas L. Lee       495,618   237,500   $ 1,165,294   $ 8,906

Gary M. Cusumano

 


 


 

386,864

 

106,000

 

 

909,125

 

 

7,125

Thomas E. Dierckman

 


 


 

246,709

 

84,250

 

 

577,641

 

 

5,047

Stuart R. Mork

 


 


 

238,709

 

84,250

 

 

551,891

 

 

5,047

Stephen C. Schmidt

 


 


 


 

16,000

 

 


 

 


 

 



 



 



 



 



 



Total

 


 


 

1,367,900

 

528,000

 

$

3,203,951

 

$

26,125
   
 
 
 
 
 

(1)
Based on the difference in the unit price of $23.25 at December 31, 2000 and the exercise price of the underlying options.

54


Employee Benefit Plans

    The following are descriptions of the principal employee benefit plans of the Company.

Retirement Plans

    Under the Retirement Plan, participants' benefits are calculated as 40.5% of the average annual compensation, including salary and bonus, of the highest five calendar years of the preceding ten years up to Social Security covered compensation, plus 60% of the average annual compensation in excess of covered compensation, reduced pro rata for years of service less than 30. Benefits, which accumulate after January 1, 1997, are calculated at 32.4% of the social security wage base and 48% of the excess over covered compensation. Under the Pension Restoration Plan, the Company will pay any difference between the ERISA and Internal Revenue Code maximum amount payable under the Retirement Plan and the amount otherwise payable, including amounts restricted by the compensation limit.

    The following table reflects the estimated annual benefits paid as a single life annuity upon retirement at age 65 under the Retirement Plan and Pension Restoration Plan at various assumed compensation ranges and credited years of service:

 
 
  Years of Service
Compensation

  10
  20
  30
  40
$   125,000   $ 21,000   $ 43,000   $ 66,000   $ 68,000
    200,000     34,000     72,000     109,000     113,000
    275,000     48,000     100,000     153,000     158,000
    350,000     61,000     129,000     196,000     203,000
    425,000     75,000     157,000     240,000     248,000
    450,000     79,000     167,000     254,000     263,000
    500,000     88,000     186,000     283,000     293,000
    550,000     97,000     205,000     312,000     323,000
    600,000     106,000     224,000     341,000     353,000
    750,000     133,000     281,000     428,000     443,000

    Credited years of service as of December 31, 2000 (to the nearest whole year) and average annual compensation for the highest five years of the last ten years are as follows: 30 years and $785,000 for Mr. Lee; 31 years and $600,000 for Mr. Cusumano; 13 years and $350,000 for Mr. Mork; 18 years and $360,000 for Mr. Dierckman; and 1 year and $140,000 for Mr. Schmidt.

Change in Control Severance Program

    In 1997, the Partnership entered into severance agreements with Messrs. Lee, Cusumano, Dierckman and Mork, which agreements provide benefits in the event of a "change of control." Under the provisions of the severance agreements, a "change of control" is deemed to have occurred when (i) any "person" (other than a trustee or similar person holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Partnership, or an entity owned by the unitholders in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of units) becomes the beneficial owner of 25% or more of the total voting power represented by the Partnership's then outstanding voting securities, (ii) Newhall Management Corporation is removed as managing general partner of Newhall Management Limited Partnership, or (iii) the holders of the voting securities of the Partnership approve a merger or consolidation of the Partnership with any other entity, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Partnership outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) at least 75% of the total voting power represented by the voting securities of the Partnership or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation, or (iv) a plan of complete liquidation of

55


the Partnership is adopted or the holders of the voting securities of the Partnership approve an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Partnership (in one transaction or a series of transactions) of all or substantially all the Partnership's assets. Entitlement to benefits arises if, within two years following a change in control, the executive officer's employment is terminated or if he or she elects to terminate his or her employment following action by the Partnership which results in (i) a reduction in salary or other benefits, (ii) change in location of employment (iii) a change in position, duties, responsibilities or status inconsistent with the executive officer's prior position or a reduction in responsibilities, duties, or offices as in effect immediately before the change in control, or (iv) the failure of the Partnership to obtain express assumption by any successor of the Partnership's obligations under the severance agreement.

    Benefits payable under the agreements to Messrs. Lee and Cusumano consist of (i) payment in a single lump sum equal to base salary and general partners fees for three years, (ii) payment in a single lump sum of three times the average bonus payments for the two fiscal years preceding the change in control, (iii) continuation of participation in insurance and certain other fringe benefits for three years, (iv) immediate vesting of deferred compensation, nonqualified retirement benefits, options and other unit-based rights, (v) a retirement benefit equivalent to the additional benefits that would have accrued under retirement plans if employment had continued for two years, and (vi) reduction of required service for full retirement benefits from 30 years to 20 years through a non-qualified arrangement. The benefits payable to Messrs. Dierckman and Mork are the same as for Messrs. Lee and Cusumano except that base salary, bonus and fringe benefits would be paid for two years and the retirement benefit for one year. Certain vice presidents who entered into a severance agreement would receive base salary, bonus and fringe benefits for one year. Benefits payable under the agreements are in lieu of any severance benefits under the Partnership's general severance policy. The agreements are not contingent upon the executive officers actively seeking other employment, but provide for offset of fringe benefits provided by a new employer.

Compensation of the Directors

    The Partnership Agreement provides that the compensation of the general partners and their partners, directors, officers and employees shall be determined by Newhall Management Limited Partnership. Both the compensation committee and the nominating committee of the Board of Directors of Newhall Management Corporation, the managing general partner of Newhall Management Limited Partnership, have been granted authority by the Board of Directors to determine certain compensation issues. Non-employee members of the Board receive an annual retainer fee of $24,000 for serving on the Board, $2,000 for serving on the Audit Committee and $1,000 for serving on any other committee of the Board. In addition, non-employee directors receive a fee of $1,000 for attending each meeting of the Board or committee of which they are a member. Committee chairpersons receive a fee of $500 in addition to the regular meeting fee for each committee meeting they conduct. Employees serving on the Board of Directors do not receive directors' fees. Directors' compensation may be deferred until separation from the Board. Deferred amounts earn interest at the Wells Fargo Bank prime rate. Members of the Board of Directors will also receive reimbursement for travel and other expenses related to attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors and of the committees. In addition, the Partnership Agreement requires the Partnership to reimburse the Newhall Management Limited Partnership for any federal or California income taxes imposed upon the managing general partner or its managing general partner as a result of its activities as managing general partner. Under the terms of the 1995 Option/Award Plan adopted by the Board of Directors on January 18, 1995, each non-employee Board member may elect to have all or any portion of the annual retainer fees paid in Partnership units or, as amended on July 15, 1998, in options thereon instead of cash.

    The 1995 Option/Award Plan also provides each non-employee director serving on the Board on January 18, 1995, and each newly elected or appointed non-employee director, with a non-statutory

56


option ("Automatic Option") to purchase 1,500 depositary units. On the third Wednesday of July of each year that occurs after January 18, 1995, each continuing non-employee director will automatically receive an Automatic Option to purchase 500 Partnership units. Each Automatic Option vests immediately and has a term of 10 years. Generally, the non-employee director may exercise his or her option for a period of 3 months after termination of service as a non-employee director for any reason other than death or "retirement," 12 months after the date of death and 36 months after the date of "retirement." "Retirement" means the first day the non-employee director ceases to serve as a non-employee director after serving as a non-employee director for at least five years.

    In addition, non-employee directors automatically receive 500 unit rights on the third Wednesday of July of each year pursuant to the terms of the Deferred Equity Compensation Plan for Outside Directors which was adopted effective November 1, 1996. Unit rights entitle a director to receive an equal number of Partnership units upon separation from the Board of Directors for any reason.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

    In June 1994, Valencia Water Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, borrowed $11 million from Pacific Life Insurance Company at a rate of 8% per annum. The terms of the loan require semi-annual interest payments with principal due at maturity. In addition, the Company has acquired two life insurance policies for its two senior officers with face amounts of approximately $1.5 million each from Pacific Life. Thomas C. Sutton, a director of the Corporation, is Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Life Insurance Company.

    All of the foregoing transactions are at rates and terms comparable to those of similar transactions with unrelated parties.

Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Newhall Management Corporation

Compensation Committee Charter

    The Compensation Committee, which is comprised entirely of independent directors, evaluates the performance of the Chief Executive Officer, determines or approves compensation of all executive officers of the Company and reviews management development issues. It has regularly scheduled meetings two times a year, and meets at other times as appropriate. During 2000, the Committee met three (3) times.

Senior Management Compensation Philosophy

    The Company believes its success is greatly influenced by the caliber of its employees. The Company's compensation program for senior management is designed to attract, motivate and retain a highly skilled, professional and dedicated work force. In this regard, the Company's senior management compensation program consists of:

    The Company's objective is for the base salary, annual incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation of senior management to approximate the median levels for an industry comparison group consisting primarily of real estate companies with which the Company competes for

57


executive talent. From year-to-year, however, relative compensation levels may vary due largely to variances in individual and Company performance. The companies with which the Company competes for executive talent are not the same as those in the Wilshire Real Estate Securities Index shown in the stock performance graph. In addition, for managers other than the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Operating Officer, there is a subjective element to incentive compensation which relates to his or her success in meeting individual business and personal goals determined at the beginning of each year. The goals for the business segment he or she manages are based primarily on increasing unitholder values through profitability and, most importantly, the value of the Company's landholdings.

Base Salary Compensation

    The base salary for each executive officer is determined on the basis of an evaluation of the responsibilities of each position compared to other positions in the Company and to base salary levels in effect for comparable positions at the Company's principal competitors for executive talent. In addition, the qualifications of the executive officer, including training and experience, is considered in determining base salary. Salaries are reviewed approximately every two years and adjustments may be made, as appropriate, to each executive officer's base salary. External salary data provided to the Committee by an independent compensation survey firm indicate that salaries for 2000 were generally below the median level.

Annual Merit and Incentive Compensation (Bonuses)

    For 2000, the annual bonuses paid under the Company's Executive Incentive Plan were determined on the basis of the Company's earnings, the net cash generated for unit repurchases and attainment of individual goals. Target earnings, target net cash flow generation and individual goals were developed at the beginning of the year. Target bonuses are determined as percentages of base salaries for each management group based upon ability to influence the success of the Company and are generally set to produce bonuses comparable to other real estate companies over a period of time. At the end of the year, bonuses were determined by utilizing the percentages of Company and individual goals achieved as compared to the Company and individual goals determined at the beginning of the year. The aggregate amount of such incentive bonuses may not exceed 7% of the Company's net income after deducting the incentive awards. The target bonuses (except for Mr. Lee's bonus) are recommended by the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Lee, and approved by the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors.

    Senior executives are paid a portion of their current year's bonus in Partnership units until they reach their unit ownership guidelines described below. Messrs. Lee, Cusumano, Dierckman and Mork each received a portion of their 2000 bonus in Partnership units as described in the Summary Compensation Table. Additionally, any manager may elect to receive all or any part of his or her annual bonus in Partnership units and to defer receipt of such Partnership units for up to five (5) years.

    The total of the bonuses paid for 2000 was $4.728 million (or 5.5% of 2000 income after deducting bonuses), versus $5.164 million in 1999 (or 5.7% of income after deducting bonuses), an 8.4% decrease from 1999 to 2000. The incentive targets for 2000 were focused on net cash generation for the Company's unit repurchase program, which was a change from the recent historical targets that focused incentives on the Company's earnings. For purposes of the Incentive Plan, "net cash generation" included cash from all sources including operations, asset sales and borrowings, minus all uses of cash, including operating expenses, infrastructure expenditures, debt service, Partnership distributions and capital expenditures. Approximately 97% of the targeted "net cash generation" was achieved. Consequently, approximately 97% of the available bonus pool was awarded.

58


Long-Term Incentive Compensation

    The Committee endorses the view that equity ownership of the Company aligns management's and unitholders' interests and thereby enhances unitholders' value. The equity component of compensation includes unit options, appreciation rights, restricted units, unit rights and bonuses paid in Partnership units (described above) under the Company's 1995 Option/Award Plan. Option awards are generally made at mid-year to key management personnel who are in positions to make substantial contributions to the long-term success of the Company. These awards vest and are expected to grow in value over time and for that reason represent compensation which is attributable to service over a period of up to ten years. This focuses attention on managing the Company from the perspective of an owner with an equity stake in the business.

    The size of the unit options granted to each executive officer is based on the aggregate exercise price. Generally it is set at a multiple of salary which the Committee deems appropriate in order to create a meaningful opportunity for ownership based upon the individual's current position with the Company. The unit options granted also take into account comparable awards to individuals in similar positions in the industry, as reflected in external surveys, and the individual's potential for future responsibility and promotion over the option term.

    The Company adopted unit ownership guidelines for senior executives. The guidelines encourage senior executives to own units having a market value of at least 50% of base salary. As an inducement to purchase Partnership units the Company offers one unit right for every five units purchased. A unit right entitles the recipient to receive one Partnership unit for each unit right. Historically, unit rights vested at the rate of 20% a year over a five year period. Unit rights granted after July 2000 vest at the rate of 331/3% per year over a three year period.

    In November 1997, a special grant of premium price options was made to the top executive officers of the Company to provide additional incentive for them to deliver near-term, substantial price growth in the outstanding Partnership units and to enhance their incentive compensation to be more comparable with that of publicly-traded real estate companies. The options were granted in two tranches, both of which were exercisable in three years provided certain price performance objectives were met. The first tranche vesting requirements provided that the optioned units granted in the tranche would vest if during the three year period, commencing on the date of grant: 1) the unit market price of the Partnership units increased by 25% from the date of grant (to $31.30 per unit) and that unit market price was sustained or exceeded for at least ten of twenty consecutive trading days; or 2) total return on a Partnership unit equaled or exceeded the 75th percentile of shares of a peer group of other publicly-traded real estate companies. The first tranche vested during 1998 because the price requirement was met. The second tranche would have vested if: 1) the unit market price of the Partnership units increased by 331/3% from the date of grant (to $33.39 per unit) and was sustained or exceeded for at least ten of twenty consecutive trading days; 2) or met the total return requirement previously described. Neither the unit price requirement nor the total return requirement for the second tranche were accomplished during the requisite three year period. Consequently, the second tranche premium price options expired. The first tranche of the premium price options that vested in 1998 expire in November 2002.

    The premium price options were intended to replace market price options for three years. Consequently, no options were granted to the senior executive officers during the subsequent three-year period. At the end of the three-year period, the Compensation Committee requested an independent compensation consulting firm to assess senior executive compensation, including long-term incentive compensation, as compared to other publicly-held real estate companies. The assessment determined that senior executive total compensation generally was below the median for the Company's competitors. The Committee granted new premium price options to four senior executive officers at an exercise price of $28.00 or approximately 21.5% above the then current unit market price. The options

59


vest at a rate of 331/3% per year commencing on the first anniversary date of the grant and will expire five years following the grant date.

Chief Executive Officer Compensation

    Mr. Lee's base salary was $440,000 in 2000, the same as in 1999. In addition, he was paid general partners fees of $60,000 for managing Newhall General Partnership, a general partner of the Company, and a bonus for 2000 of $727,500 for total "cash" compensation of $1,227,500. (One half of Mr. Lee's bonus was paid in Partnership units in lieu of cash.) Mr. Lee's 2000 bonus was 97% of his target bonus of 150% of his base compensation pursuant to the Company's Executive Incentive Plan (see description of Annual Merit and Incentive Compensation (Bonus) Plan on page 53). As previously described, targeted net cash generation was determined at the beginning of the year to incent management to generate "net cash" for the Company's unit repurchase program. Mr. Lee's targeted incentive bonus was dependent entirely on the Company's net cash generation during the year. By the end of the year, approximately 97% of the targeted net cash generation was achieved primarily through asset and land sales. The calculation to determine the amount of the bonus earned was based entirely on the Company's achievement of targeted net cash generation.

    Mr. Lee also received a premium price option for 230,000 units as described above. The benefits of this unit option grant, as well as previously granted premium price and market price options, were expected to be realized over the next two to six years during which Mr. Lee's emphasis on strategic planning is expected to yield benefits to the Company's investors.

Section 162 Limit

    Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits federal income tax deductions for compensation paid to the Chief Executive Officer and other highly compensated officers of a public company to $1 million per year, but contains an exception for performance-based compensation that satisfies certain conditions. The Company has been advised that Section 162(m) does not apply to limited partnerships such as the Company.

    Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Newhall Management Corporation:

    The preceding Compensation Committee Report and the following Stock Price Performance graphs shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

60


The Newhall Land and Farming Company
Stock Performance Analysis
Five-Year Total Return

GRAPH

Ten-Year Total Return

LOGO

Assumes $100 invested on December 31, 1995 for the 5-year graph and December 31, 1990 for the 10-year graph. Total return includes reinvestment of dividends.

    * As of 12/29/00 the Wilshire Real Estate Securities Index consisted of the following real estate operating companies: Catellus Development Corporation, Extended Stay America, Lodgian Inc., The Newhall Land and Farming Company, Prime Hospitality Co., Starwood Hotels & Resorts, Trizec Hahn Corp. and Wyndham International Inc.

61


Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

Directors and Officers

    The following table sets forth the number of units beneficially owned by each director of Newhall Management Corporation, each of the Company's five highest paid executive officers, and all directors and officers as a group as of February 28, 2001.

Name

  Amount and Nature
of Beneficial Ownership

  Percent
of Class(%)

 
George L. Argyros   116,140   (1)(2)(3)   *  
Gary M. Cusumano   529,515   (1)(2)(4)   1.98  
Thomas E. Dierckman   274,730   (2)(4)(5)   1.03  
Thomas L. Lee   614,948   (1)(2)(4)(5)   2.29  
Thomas V. McKernan, Jr.   18,951   (1)(2)(3)   *  
Stuart R. Mork   252,107   (2)(4)(5)   *  
Henry K. Newhall   322,059   (1)(2)(3)(6)   1.22  
Jane Newhall   572,887   (1)(2)(3)   2.17  
Peter T. Pope   26,333   (1)(2)(3)   *  
Carl E. Reichardt   96,903   (1)(2)(3)(7)   *  
Stephen C. Schmidt   1,220   (4)(5)   *  
Thomas C. Sutton   19,875   (1)(2)(3)(8)   *  
Barry Lawson Williams   10,828   (1)(2)(3)   *  
Ezra K. Zilkha   1,233,320   (1)(2)(3)(9)   4.68  
All directors and officers as a group (23 persons)   4,253,868   (10)   15.19 %

*
Represents less than 1% of the securities outstanding.

(1)
Includes 72,000 units each for Messrs. Henry K. Newhall and Zilkha, 71,650 units for Ms. Jane Newhall, 2,000 units each for Messrs. Argyros, McKernan, Pope, Reichardt, Sutton and Williams which are held by Newhall Management Limited Partnership. Includes 66,000 units held by Newhall Management Limited Partnership and 20 units contributed to Newhall General Partnership by each of Messrs. Cusumano and Lee. Of the total of 359,690 units held by the Newhall Management Limited Partnership beneficially for the directors, 20 units have been contributed to Newhall General Partnership, and of those 20 units, 10 units have been contributed back to Newhall Management Limited Partnership by Newhall General Partnership. See Item 10 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information on a shareholders' agreement, voting trust agreement and limited partnership agreement relating to these units.

(2)
Includes the following number of units subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 2001: 4,000 for Mr. Argyros; 386,864 units for Mr. Cusumano; 246,709 for Mr. Dierckman; 495,618 for Mr. Lee; 7,132 units for Mr. McKernan; 238,709 for Mr. Mork; 10,713 for Mr. Pope; 3,865 for Mr. Williams; and 4,500 each for Ms. Newhall and Messrs. Newhall, Reichardt, Sutton and Zilkha.

(3)
Includes the following number of units subject to unit rights pursuant to the Deferred Equity Compensation Plan for Outside Directors, which units are distributable upon separation from the Board of Directors: 2,658 units for Mr. Argyros; 2,819 for Mr. McKernan; 6,968 for Mr. Newhall; 12,967 for Ms. Newhall; 5,394 for Mr. Pope; 11,103 for Mr. Reichardt; 3,985 for Mr. Sutton; 2,098 for Mr. Williams and 16,220 for Mr. Zilkha.

(4)
Includes the following number of units subject to unit rights under certain circumstances pursuant to the 1995 Option/Award Plan: 2,907 for Mr. Cusumano; 14,078 for Mr. Dierckman; 6,306 for Mr. Lee; 6,779 for Mr. Mork; and 1,073 for Mr. Schmidt.

62


(5)
Includes the following number of units held by the Company's Employee Savings Plan on behalf of the respective officer: 2,756 for Mr. Dierckman; 1,826 for Mr. Lee; and 2,990 for Mr. Mork; and 71 for Mr. Schmidt. The Employee Savings Plan holds Partnership units for the participants in a unitized account. Consequently, the number of units for each of the officers is determined by the dollar value of the participant's account divided by the closing market unit price on any given day.

(6)
The Partnership is advised that Henry K. Newhall has sole voting and investment power as to 82,804 units, of which 70,616 units are held by a trust for which he is the trustee and beneficiary. Voting and investment power is shared with others as to 167,975 units held by certain trusts of which he disclaims beneficial ownership.

(7)
Includes 2,000 units held by trusts for which Mr. Reichardt has sole voting and investment power as the trustee and for which he disclaims beneficial ownership.

(8)
The Partnership is advised that Mr. Sutton has sole voting and investment power as to 9,390 units held by a trust for which he is a trustee.

(9)
Includes 230,600 units held by Zilkha & Sons, Inc. for which the Partnership is advised that Mr. Zilkha has sole voting and investment power, and 70,000 units held by Mr. Zilkha's wife for which he disclaims beneficial ownership.

(10)
Includes 1,546,260 units subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days from February 28, 2001 pursuant to the Partnership's 1995 Option/Award Plan; and 113,681 units subject to unit rights pursuant to the Partnership's Deferred Equity Compensation Plan for Outside Directors and the 1995 Option/Award Plan.

    Except as indicated otherwise in the above notes, the specified persons possess sole voting and investment power as to the indicated number of units to the best of the Company's knowledge.

    Certain provisions of the Partnership's Limited Partnership Agreement require the affirmative vote of holders of at least 75% of the Partnership's voting power to approve (i) the removal of any general partner or the election of any general partner as the Partnership's managing general partner; or (ii) certain business combinations and other specified transactions ("Business Combinations") with, or proposed by or on behalf of, persons beneficially owning 10% or more of the Partnership's voting power, unless such Business Combination is either approved by a majority of the present directors of Newhall Management Corporation (or by directors who are nominated by them) or certain price and procedural requirements are satisfied.

63


Certain Unitholders

    The following table sets forth information about an unitholder that beneficially owns more than 5% of outstanding Partnership units as of February 28, 2001.

Name and Address

  Number of Units
Beneficially Owned

  Percent
Of Class

 
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and related entities(a)
One State Farm Plaza
Bloomington, Illinois 61710-0001
  3,400,758   12.9 %

Highfields Capital Management LP(b)
Highfields GP LLC
Jonathon S. Jacobsen
Richard L. Grubman
Highfields Capital II LP
c/o Highfields Capital Management LP
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02117

 

2,534,100

 

9.6

%

(a)
Information is based upon a Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 15) dated February 9, 2001. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company has disclosed it has sole voting and investment power over all of the units.

(b)
Information is based upon Schedules 13G (Amendment No. 2) dated February 14, 2001. The reporting persons have disclosed they have sole voting and investment power over all the units.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

    For additional related party information see the section entitled "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" under Item 11—"Executive Compensation."

64


PART IV

Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) Documents filed with this report:

 
   
   
1.       See Index to Financial Statements on page 20 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2.

 

 

 

Financial Statement Schedules: Schedule III—Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation with accountants' report thereon. Other schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.

3.

 

 

 

Exhibits (listed by numbers corresponding to the Exhibit Table of Item 601 in Regulation S-K):

 

 

3(a)

 

The Newhall Land and Farming Company (a California Limited Partnership) Limited Partnership Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(e) to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-14 filed August 24, 1984.

 

 

(b)

 

First Amendment to Limited Partnership Agreement of The Newhall Land and Farming Company (a California Limited Partnership) incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(b) of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December  31, 1993, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

 

 

4   

 

Depositary Receipt for Units of Interest, The Newhall Land and Farming Company (a California Limited Partnership) incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

*

 

10(a)

 

The Newhall Land and Farming Company 1995 Option/Award Plan incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated March 22, 1995 (Commission File Number 33-58171).

*

 

(b)

 

Newhall Executive Incentive Plan (as amended July 11, 1990) incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 (b) of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 (Commission File Number 1-8885).

*

 

(c)

 

The Newhall Land and Farming Company Employee Savings Plan incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated May 24, 1994 (Commission File Number 33-53769).

*

 

(d)

 

The Newhall Land and Farming Company Retirement Plan Restatement, Amendments No. 1 through 5, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

*

 

(e)

 

Form of Severance Agreements incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(e) of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 (Commission File Number 1-8885).

*

 

(f)

 

The Newhall Land and Farming Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (Restated effective January 15, 1992) incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(g) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December  31, 1991, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

*

 

(g)

 

The Newhall Land and Farming Company Senior Management Survivor Income Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(h) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993, (Commission File Number 1-8885).


 

 

 

 

65



 

 

(h)

 

Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Partnership and its General Partners and the general partners, partners, shareholders, officers and directors of its General Partners, or of the Managing General Partner of the Managing General Partner, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 28(g) to the Company's report on Form 8-K filed December 11, 1990, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

 

 

(i)

 

Tax Payment and Tax Benefit Reimbursement Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 28(f) to the Company's report on Form 8-K filed December 11, 1990, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

*

 

(j)

 

The Newhall Land and Farming Company Deferred Cash Bonus Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(l) of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

*

 

(k)

 

Form of award issued under The Newhall Land and Farming Company Deferred Cash Bonus Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(m) of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

*

 

(l)

 

The Newhall Land and Farming Company Employee Savings Restoration Plan As Amended Effective January 1, 1999, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) of the Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1998, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

*

 

(m)

 

The Newhall Land and Farming Company Pension Restoration Plan (As amended through July 15, 1998) incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) of the Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1998, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

 

 

(n)

 

Trust Agreement dated January 15, 1992 between the Partnership and Newhall Management Corporation incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(p) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1991, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

 

 

(o)

 

The Newhall Land and Farming Company Employee Unit Purchase Plan incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated May 24, 1994, (Commission File Number 33-53767).

*

 

(p)

 

Amendment No. 1 to The Newhall Land and Farming Company Retirement Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(r) of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

 

 

(q)

 

The Newhall Land and Farming Company Deferred Equity and Compensation Plan for Outside Directors incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated November 1, 1996, (Commission File Number 333-15303).

*

 

(r)

 

Amendment No. 2 to The Newhall Land and Farming Company Retirement Plan dated August 1, 1996 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(r) the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

*

 

(s)

 

Amendment No. 3 to The Newhall Land and Farming Company Retirement Plan dated July 15, 1998, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) of the Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1998, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

*

 

(t)

 

Amendment No. 1 to The Newhall Land and Farming Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan dated January 15, 1997 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(t) of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December  31, 1996, (Commission File Number 1-8885).


 

 

 

 

66



*

 

(u)

 

First Amendment to The Newhall Land and Farming Company 1995 Option/Award Plan dated November 19, 1997 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(v) of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

*

 

(v)

 

Form of award for premium price options granted under The Newhall Land and Farming Company 1995 Option/Award Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(w) of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

*

 

(w)

 

Amendment No. 2 to The Newhall Land and Farming Company Savings Plan dated July 15, 1998, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) the Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1998, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

 

 

(x)

 

Valencia Marketplace Purchase and Sale Agreement dated January 7, 1998 and subsequent First, Second, Third and Fourth Amendments incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 the Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March  31, 1998, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

 

 

(y)

 

Fifth Amendment dated May 29, 1998 to the Valencia Marketplace Purchase and Sale Agreement incorporated by reference to the Company's Report on Form 8-K filed June 19, 1998, (File Number 1-8885).

*

 

(z)

 

Amendment Number One Effective January 1, 1999 to Newhall Executive Incentive Plan (as amended July 11, 1990) incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 of the Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

*

 

(aa)

 

Amendment No. 4 to the Newhall Land and Farming Company Retirement Plan dated July 21, 1999 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 of the Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

*

 

(ab)

 

Second Amendment to The Newhall Land and Farming Company 1995 Option/Award Plan adopted as of July 15, 1998 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) of the Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

*

 

(ac)

 

Amendment No. 3 to The Newhall Land and Farming Company Employee Savings Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 (a) of the Company's report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000, (Commission File Number 1-8885.)

*

 

(ad)

 

The Newhall Land and Farming Company Employee Savings Restoration Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective July 19, 2000), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

 

 

11  

 

Computation of earnings per unit

 

 

21  

 

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

 

 

23  

 

Independent Auditors' Consent

 

 

99(a)

 

Articles of Incorporation of Newhall Management Corporation, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 28(b) to the Company's report on Form 8-K filed December 11, 1990, (Commission File Number 1-8885).


 

 

 

 

67



 

 

(b)

 

Bylaws of Newhall Management Corporation incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 (e) to the Company's report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 (Commission File Number 1-8885).

 

 

(c)

 

Amended and Restated Shareholders' Agreement between Newhall Management Corporation, its shareholders and the Newhall Management Corporation Voting Trust incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99(a) to the Company's report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 (Commission File Number 1-8885).

 

 

(d)

 

Extension Agreement to Voting Trust Agreement between Newhall Management Corporation, the Trustee, and the individual shareholders of Newhall Management Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99(b) of the Company's report on Form  10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

 

 

(e)

 

Voting Trust Agreement between Newhall Management Corporation, the Trustee, and the individual shareholders of Newhall Management Corporation incorporated by reference to Exhibit 28(e) of the Company's report on Form 8-K filed December  11, 1990, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

 

 

(f)

 

Partnership Agreement of Newhall General Partnership incorporated by reference to Exhibit 28(e) to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-14 filed August 24, 1984, and the Certificate of Amendment of Partnership Agreement of Newhall General Partnership, dated November 14, 1990 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 28(e) of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

 

 

(g)

 

Limited Partnership Agreement of Newhall Management Limited Partnership, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 28(a) to the Company's report on Form 8-K filed December 11, 1990, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

 

 

(h)

 

Amendment Number One to Limited Partnership Agreement of Newhall Management Limited Partnership incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 (c) of the Company's report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 (Commission File Number 1-8885).

 

 

(i)

 

Second Amendment to Partnership Agreement of Newhall General Partnership, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 (d) of the Company's report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000, (Commission File Number 1-8885).

*
The items marked above constitute Executive Compensation Plans and Arrangements.

    (b) No report on Form 8-K was filed in the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2000.

68


    Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

    THE NEWHALL LAND AND FARMING COMPANY

 

 

 

(a California Limited Partnership)

Registrant

 

 

By

Newhall Management Limited Partnership,
Managing General Partner

 

 

By

Newhall Management Corporation,
Managing General Partner

Date: March 20, 2001

 

By

/s/ 
THOMAS L. LEE   
Thomas L. Lee
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

    Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Date: March 20, 2001     /s/ THOMAS L. LEE   
Thomas L. Lee
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Newhall Management Corporation (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: March 20, 2001

 

 

/s/ 
STUART R. MORK   
Stuart R. Mork
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Newhall Management Corporation (Principal Financial Officer)

Date: March 20, 2001

 

 

/s/ 
DONALD L. KIMBALL   
Donald L. Kimball
Vice President—Finance and Controller Newhall Management Corporation (Principal Accounting Officer)

Directors of Newhall Management Corporation:

 

 

 

Date: March 21, 2001

 

 

/s/ 
GEORGE L. ARGYROS   
George L. Argyros

Date: March 21, 2001

 

 

/s/ 
GARY M. CUSUMANO   
Gary M. Cusumano


 

 

 

69



Date: March 21, 2001

 

 

/s/ 
THOMAS L. LEE   
Thomas L. Lee

Date: March 21, 2001

 

 

/s/ 
THOMAS V. MCKERNAN, JR.   
Thomas V. McKernan, Jr.

Date: March 21, 2001

 

 

/s/ 
HENRY K. NEWHALL   
Henry K. Newhall

Date: March 21, 2001

 

 

/s/ 
JANE NEWHALL   
Jane Newhall

Date: March 21, 2001

 

 

/s/ 
PETER T. POPE   
Peter T. Pope

Date: March 21, 2001

 

 

/s/ 
CARL E. REICHARDT   
Carl E. Reichardt

Date: March 21, 2001

 

 

/s/ 
THOMAS C. SUTTON   
Thomas C. Sutton

Date: March 21, 2001

 

 

/s/ 
BARRY LAWSON WILLIAMS   
Barry Lawson Williams

Date: March 21, 2001

 

 

/s/ 
EZRA K. ZILKHA   
Ezra K. Zilkha

70


The Newhall Land and Farming Company
Schedule III—Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2000
(Dollars in thousands)

 
   
   
   
   
   
  Gross Amount at Which Carried
at December 31, 2000 (D)

   
   
   
 
 
   
   
  Initial Cost of Development
   
   
   
   
 
 
   
   
  Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Completion

   
   
   
 
Description

  Encum-
brances

   
  Land
  Buildings and
Improvements

  Land
  Buildings and
Improvements

  Total
  Accumulated
Depreciation

  Year
Completed/
Acquired

  Depreciable
Lives

 
OPERATING PROPERTIES                                                              
Shopping Centers                                                              
Valencia Town Center   $ 26,928       $ 22,136   $ 41,425   $ (1,250 ) $ 22,136   $ 40,175   $ 62,311   $ (15,235 ) 1992   (E )
Valencia Town Center—Ring Road               804     14,214         804     14,214     15,018     (1,356 ) 1998   (E )
River Oaks     (A )       2,354     5,302     831     2,354     6,133     8,487     (2,703 ) 1987   (E )
NorthPark Village Square     (A )       2,701     7,398         2,701     7,398     10,099     (1,101 ) 1996   (E )
Hotel                                                              
Valencia Hilton Garden Inn (C)                                         1991   (E )
Hyatt Valencia Hotel and Conference Center               2,131     37,497     138     2,131     37,635     39,766     (5,073 ) 1998   (E )
Office and Mixed Use Projects                                                              
City Center Office Building     (B )       2,614     4,192     1,697     2,614     5,889     8,503     (2,539 ) 1991   (E )
Town Center Plaza               636     5,399     41     636     5,440     6,076     (529 ) 1999   (E )
Valencia Entertainment Center                   26,799             26,799     26,799     (2,033 ) 1999   (E )
Single Tenant Facilities                                                              
Office/Records Storage               569     2,151         569     2,151     2,720     (379 ) 1996   (E )
Retail Store—Trader Joe's               269     546         269     546     815     (116 ) 1994   (E )
Spectrum Health Club     (B )       1,000     6,156     155     1,000     6,311     7,311     (555 ) 1997   (E )
Restaurant—El Torito               248     802         248     802     1,050     (414 ) 1986   (E )
Restaurant—Hamburger Hamlet               459     661         459     661     1,120     (263 ) 1990   (E )
Restaurant—Red Lobster               134             134         134       1986   (E )
Restaurant—Wendy's               91     300         91     300     391     (123 ) 1984   (E )
Other Properties and Land Under Lease               2,466     4,891     (25 )   2,466     4,866     7,332     (876 ) Various   (E )
   
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
         
TOTAL OPERATING PROPERTIES     26,928         38,612     157,733     1,587     38,612     159,320     197,932     (33,295 )        
   
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
         
TOTAL PROPERTIES UNDER DEVELOPMENT                 (4,132 )           (4,132 )   (4,132 )            
   
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
         
T O T A L   $ 26,928       $ 38,612   $ 153,601   $ 1,587   $ 38,612   $ 155,188   $ 193,800   $ (33,295 )        
   
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
         

71


The Newhall Land and Farming Company
Schedule III (continued)
December 31, 2000

(A)
Secures financings with a total principal balance of $24.5 million at December 31, 2000.

(B)
Classifed as "Income-Producing Properties Held for Sale" on the December 31, 2000 balance sheet

(C)
Joint venture accounted for as an equity investment.

(D)
The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is approximately $209,317 at December 31, 2000

(E)
Reference is made to Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to depreciation.

(F)
Reconciliation of total real estate carrying value for the three years ended December 31, 2000 are as follows:

(In
thousands)

 
  2000
  1999
  1998
 
Balance at beginning of period   $ 328,969   $ 288,155   $ 262,634  
  Additions:                    
    Cash expenditures     27,441     67,988     101,789  
  Deletions:                    
    Cost of real estate sold     (161,343 )   (23,034 )   (76,268 )
    Other     (1,267 )   (4,140 )      
   
 
 
 
Balance at end of period   $ 193,800   $ 328,969   $ 288,155  
   
 
 
 
(G)
Reconciliation of real estate accumulated depreciation for the three years ended December 31, 2000 are as follows:

(In
thousands)

 
  2000
  1999
  1998
 
Balance at beginning of period   $ 47,909   $ 39,443   $ 35,431  
  Additions:                    
    Charged to expense     10,272     11,718     7,277  
    Other              
  Deletions:                    
    Cost of real estate sold     (24,886 )       (3,265 )
    Other           (3,252 )    
   
 
 
 
Balance at end of period   $ 33,295   $ 47,909   $ 39,443  
   
 
 
 

72


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

The Board of Directors of Newhall Management Corporation
and Partners of The Newhall Land and Farming Company:

    Under date of January 16, 2001, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of The Newhall Land and Farming Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000, and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in partners' capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, as contained in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year 2000. In connection with our audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also audited the related schedule of real estate and accumulated depreciation as of December 31, 2000 and for each of the years in the three-year period then ended. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audits.

    In our opinion, the financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.


Los Angeles, California
January 16, 2001

 

/s/ 
KPMG LLP   

73


THE NEWHALL LAND AND FARMING COMPANY
INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Item 14 (a) 3

Exhibits
Number

  Description

11

 

Computation of earnings per unit

21

 

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

23

 

Independent Auditors' Consent

74