Back to GetFilings.com
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
------------------------
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 000-30271
------------------------
PEC SOLUTIONS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 54-1339972
(State or other jurisdiction (IRS Employer
of Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)
12750 FAIR LAKES CIRCLE, FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA 22033
(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (703) 679-4900
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: NONE
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
COMMON STOCK, $0.01 PAR VALUE
(Title of Each Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes /X/ No / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. / /
Aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant as of March 23, 2001 was: $30,031,429 based on the closing sale price
on the NASDAQ Market on that date.
Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 23, 2001 was:
22,493,450 shares
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Part III--Proxy Statement for the 2001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on
May 23, 2001. Such proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the Registrant's fiscal year
ended December 31, 2000.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FORM 10-K
INDEX
PAGE
--------
PART I
ITEM 1 Business........................................... 3-15
ITEM 2 Properties......................................... 15
ITEM 3 Legal Proceedings.................................. 15
ITEM 4 Submission Of Matters To a Vote of Security
Holders................................................... 15
PART II
ITEM 5 Market for the Company's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters....................................... 16
ITEM 6 Selected Financial Data............................ 17
ITEM 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations................ 18-21
ITEM 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about
Market Risk............................................... 22
ITEM 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data........ 22
ITEM 9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.............................. 23
PART III
ITEM 10 Directors and Executive Officers of the Company... 24
ITEM 11 Executive Compensation............................ 24
ITEM 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management............................................ 24
ITEM 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.... 24
PART IV
ITEM 14 Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and
Reports on Form 8-K....................................... 25
Signatures....................................... 26-27
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
OVERVIEW
PEC Solutions is a professional services firm specializing in high-end
solutions that help government organizations capitalize on the Internet and
other advanced technologies. We migrate paper-intensive procedures to
web-enabled processes using eGovernment solutions that help our clients enhance
their productivity and improve the services they offer to the public. As a total
solutions provider, we address the full technology lifecycle, including
formulating technology strategies, creating business solutions, performing
long-term operational management and continuing enhancement of the solution.
Our clients have included every cabinet-level department of the federal
government as well as numerous additional entities at the federal, state and
local levels. This group includes a cross-section of civil, law enforcement,
intelligence and judicial government organizations. Our largest clients include
the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Immigration and Naturalization Service,
the Veterans Benefits Administration, the Internal Revenue Service, the Bureau
of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and the intelligence community. Since 1995, we
have provided more than $145 million of services in the government market and
have increased revenues at approximately a 48% compound annual growth rate.
INDUSTRY BACKGROUND
The emergence and adoption of the Internet as a means of gathering,
communicating and managing information continues to open up new possibilities
for businesses and organizations to dramatically improve productivity and
effectiveness. Government has emerged in recent years as one of the leading
purchasers of Internet and other advanced technology solutions. With respect to
technology services, International Data Corporation estimates that government
spending will increase from $11.8 billion in 1997 to $17.3 billion in 2002.
Government spending on Internet professional technology services alone is
expected to grow at approximately a 56% compound annual growth rate, reaching
$2.8 billion in 2003.
GOVERNMENT REFORM IS DRIVING GROWTH IN ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY SPENDING
We believe that political pressures and budgetary constraints are forcing
government agencies at all levels to improve their processes and services and to
operate more like commercial enterprises. Organizations throughout the federal,
state and local governments are investing heavily in information technology to
improve effectiveness, enhance productivity and extend new services in order to
deliver increasingly responsive and cost-effective public services. We believe
that Internet technologies provide an ideal solution to meet government's needs.
Recent changes in federal government contract procurement and compliance
regulations have streamlined the government's buying practices, resulting in a
more commercial approach to the procurement and management of technologies and
services. As a result, procurement lead times have decreased and government
buyers now have greater flexibility to purchase services on the basis of
distinguishing corporate capabilities and successful past performance. Federal
government entities now are able to award contracts based on factors other than
price alone, if they judge that the government would receive a greater value. In
addition, the General Services Administration's extension of basic
government-wide contract vehicles for procuring technology components and
services, the GSA Schedules, makes purchasing technology services easier and
faster. Federal government buyers can now order services directly from
pre-approved providers instead of using a time-consuming bid solicitation
process. We believe that these changes have improved our ability to successfully
pursue business in the
3
government market. There are currently no proposed changes to government
procurement regulations that we believe will materially affect our business in
the immediate future.
GOVERNMENT'S NEED TO OUTSOURCE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS
Government organizations rely heavily on outside contractors to provide
skilled resources to accomplish technology programs. In 1999 alone, according to
Electronics Industry Association estimates, the federal government outsourced
$26 billion of its $30 billion information technology budget. We believe that
this reliance will continue to intensify due to political and budgetary
pressures in many government agencies and due to the difficulties government
faces in recruiting and retaining highly skilled technology professionals in a
competitive labor market. In concert with its transition to more commercial
practices, government is increasingly outsourcing technology programs as a means
of simplifying the implementation and management of the technology, so that
government workers can focus on their mission.
TECHNOLOGY SERVICES PROVIDERS IN THE GOVERNMENT SECTOR
Engagements in the government market can be broadly classified into four
categories based on the type of services provided. Many companies provide a mix
of services across these categories.
First, at the low end, providing information technology staff augmentation
at low hourly rates typically involves placing staff in client facilities. These
engagements typically exhibit low operating margins and slow growth.
Second, large-scale systems integration and outsourcing engagements
typically involve assuming responsibility for acquiring, assembling and
operating large inventories of equipment and software. Major portions of these
engagements involve reselling commodity technologies at highly competitive fixed
unit prices. These engagements typically exhibit moderate growth, but low
operating margins.
Third, large-scale systems development engagements involve providing
full-service solutions that combine hardware, software development, system
engineering and operations. These engagements typically exhibit moderate growth
and operating margins.
Fourth, at the high end, engagements involving high-value management
consulting and development and integration of complex systems in core mission
areas use specialized or emerging technologies such as the Internet and advanced
security. These engagements typically exhibit strong growth and operating
margins.
CHALLENGES IN THE GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY SERVICES SECTOR
Technology services providers face a unique combination of challenges when
providing services to the government. These include:
- substantial government investments in legacy systems that are not readily
adaptable to evolving technologies;
- extremely large volumes of data collected and retained in government
databases;
- large and widely dispersed workforces, often consisting of tens of
thousands of knowledge workers located in hundreds of sites throughout the
United States and the world;
- heightened security concerns due to the need to protect individual privacy
and extraordinarily sensitive information; and
- complex management needs that require a combination of strategic planning
capabilities, government domain expertise, public sector procurement savvy
and cutting-edge technology skills.
4
OUR SOLUTION
We are a high-end technology solutions provider that addresses the needs and
particular challenges of the evolving government market by combining the
following key elements in our eGovernment solutions:
TOTAL SOLUTIONS PROVIDER CAPABILITIES
As a total solutions provider, we address the full technology lifecycle
through our deep technical capabilities and extensive government domain
knowledge. We possess a wide range of the specialized skills needed for
eGovernment engagements including: strategic technology consulting; program
management; system architectural design; network engineering; applications
development; and systems integration, deployment and operational support. We
relieve our clients of the details of the application and management of
technologies so they can focus on their core competencies and mission. Our
mission-critical solutions integrate an organization's back-office processes and
legacy systems with customized applications, and enhance the interoperability
and accessibility of critical enterprise data.
EXTENSIVE GOVERNMENT DOMAIN EXPERIENCE
Our founders, who have worked together for more than 20 years in the
government marketplace, have substantial technical and management backgrounds.
Our management maintains close working relationships with our clients and an
active role in our projects, resulting in consistent contract performance and
broad recognition of our managers. Our consulting staff is knowledgeable in the
government sector application of technology management policy formulation,
acquisition strategy, business process re-engineering and best-value procurement
methods.
DEEP TECHNOLOGY EXPERTISE
We have expertise in the critical underlying infrastructure technologies
necessary to support fully web-based enterprises, including security, intranets,
applications development and enterprise management. We have direct experience
with the legacy automation architectures found in government agencies, allowing
us to craft solutions that take advantage of the substantial investments our
clients have in legacy systems. Our employees have experience in emerging
technologies and web-enabling tools from vendors such as Microsoft, Netscape,
Oracle, Cisco, IBM/Lotus, IBM/Tivoli and Entrust.
REUSABLE SOLUTION SETS
For portions of our business, we develop reusable solution sets that can be
reapplied to requirements commonly encountered in our markets. We develop the
software code and components comprising these reusable solution sets based on
our government domain expertise. These solutions enable us to give our clients
the benefit of our knowledge and experience in addressing complex mission
challenges and to develop and implement eGovernment solutions more quickly and
efficiently. We focus our efforts on customizing solutions to meet our clients'
specific needs and to deliver reliable solutions based on components that have
been tested and perfected through repeated use.
THE PEC PHILOSOPHY--FLEXIBILITY AND OBJECTIVITY
We retain the maximum possible flexibility in the systems and components
that we use in our solutions by maintaining both strong established product
credentials and substantial hands-on experience with emerging products. We focus
on providing strategic and high-end technical service contributions to large
programs, while assisting our clients to assemble, contract with and manage the
vendors of commodity program elements. By remaining independent of specific
vendors, we are able to work with providers that best serve the interests of our
clients.
5
OUR STRATEGY
Our strategy is to continue to grow by capitalizing on our leadership
position in the eGovernment solutions market. Our strategies for obtaining this
objective include:
MAINTAINING OUR TECHNOLOGY LEADERSHIP POSITION
We will continue to focus on high-end engagements that require specialized
knowledge of emerging technologies. We intend to maintain our technology
leadership by recruiting employees who will add to our inventory of technology
skills and by refining the skills and capabilities of our existing staff through
training, certification and hands-on laboratory experimentation. We also intend
to work closely with our technology partners to share expertise and innovations
and to stay well ahead of competitors in the practical aspects of applying and
integrating emerging technologies.
INCREASING FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MARKET PENETRATION
We intend to capitalize on our long-term relationships with government
clients and our reputation within the government market to cross-sell our full
range of services to our existing client base and to expand into organizations
in the federal government for which we have not already performed services. We
intend to pursue these opportunities through a continued active sales and
marketing effort and by continuing to promote the success stories stemming from
our aggressive application of eGovernment solutions. We also intend to leverage
our relationships with our technology providers and their sales resources to
obtain new federal government clients.
ENHANCING THE PEC SOLUTIONS BRAND AND CULTURE
We are implementing an aggressive program to build the identity and
awareness of the PEC Solutions brand in order to improve our visibility in the
marketplace and to attract the best and brightest employees. We intend to hire
and retain outstanding professionals, provide incentives to achieve corporate
goals and maintain a culture that fosters innovation. We will continue to
emphasize professional development and training of our employees. We will
maintain an active internal communications program to promote a team culture and
foster high employee morale. We will also continue to emphasize our corporate
technology infrastructure to facilitate the sharing of knowledge among our
employees.
EXPANDING OUR PRESENCE IN STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SELECTED COMMERCIAL
MARKETS
We intend to leverage our domain expertise and deep technology skills for
providing services to state and local governments. We also intend to expand our
business of web-enabling private sector organizations that operate in highly
regulated industries and that have significant interactions with the government
agencies with which we work. We believe our existing solution sets, such as case
management systems, criminal suspect booking stations, and land and financial
records automation, are applicable to projects at the state and local level, as
well as at private sector organizations.
UNDERTAKING A DISCIPLINED ACQUISITION PROGRAM
We plan to broaden our capabilities and client base and extend our
geographic presence in state and local government markets by acquiring select
businesses. Acquired businesses will perform similar technical work for
organizations outside our current client base, will support solution sets that
are consistent with and extend our web-enabling strategy, or will be located in
geographic areas strategic to significant state and local governments and
programs.
6
OUR SERVICES
As a provider of eGovernment solutions, we offer a variety of services
across the full technology lifecycle. These services include:
STRATEGY AND DESIGN
We help clients develop the operational vision for integrated mission
solutions, and formulate the business and execution plans for realizing
imaginative, integrated and aggressive technology solutions. We develop
sophisticated enterprise architectures--the technology blueprints and systematic
guidance that allow enterprises to incrementally develop, migrate to and operate
large-scale systems. By re-engineering government processes, we move
organizations to an eGovernment environment. We perform economic analyses to
weigh the costs of technology investment against the operational benefits
expected from such technology implementation. We provide support to
organizations that are executing programs to privatize large-scale information
systems operations, or are undertaking far-reaching changes in their business
models, such as migrating from appropriated to fee-for-service financial models.
SOLUTIONS DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION
We develop, engineer and integrate computer hardware, commercial software,
reusable solution sets, custom-built applications and networks to create
integrated business solutions for our clients. Our emphasis on Internet
technology allows us to combine leading-edge technologies with disciplined and
effective system development methodologies. Our methods are designed to ensure
that the technology fits with business processes and that users realize process
improvement. We distinguish ourselves by addressing the core technical and
business challenges in migrating large government enterprises to integrated
eGovernment solutions. We build:
- INTEGRATED MISSION APPLICATIONS. We integrate complex back-office business
applications and legacy systems with customized mission applications using
the information-sharing capabilities of open architectures. We also
design, develop and install complex custom application systems that
implement knowledge management repositories and tera-byte data warehousing
systems allowing government agencies to mine the vast storehouses of
records that they collect and maintain.
- LARGE-SCALE INTRANET INFRASTRUCTURES. We deploy and manage complex
international network infrastructures: intranets and extranets that
deliver the performance, reliability and flexibility needed to support the
diverse needs of web-enabled organizations with thousands of widely
dispersed knowledge workers.
- LEADING-EDGE AUTHENTICATION AND ENCRYPTION SECURITY APPLICATIONS. We apply
advanced security technologies such as: public key infrastructure to
manage data encryption systems; biometric authentication to identify
individuals by their physical characteristics; and strong encryption to
protect sensitive information in highly decentralized systems against
unauthorized access and compromised integrity.
- AUTOMATED ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. We develop and deploy processes
and automated tools for our clients to centrally manage and operate
complex national networks of workstations and servers at reduced cost.
ONGOING SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT AND ENHANCEMENT
We provide long-term, ongoing support for our solutions including the
operation, management and enhancement actions necessary to keep solutions
up-to-date with evolving business processes and technologies. We use
sophisticated tools to reduce the burden and costs of maintaining large complex
7
intranets, and to enhance whole systems without the need to deploy engineers and
field service technicians to the operating locations of an enterprise. We
operate highly automated enterprise technology management processes that support
integration, configuration management, software distribution and user support,
and allow clients to outsource the responsibilities for maintaining their
technology infrastructures and applications. The results are reduced operating
costs for our clients and improved performance and reliability.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
We recently received a task order subcontract from EDS for work on the Navy
Marine Corps Intranet. The current funded tasks on that subcontract are
approximately $16 million through December 31, 2001. The subcontract is for a
base period of 5 years and has 3 option years.
SALES AND MARKETING
Our marketing efforts are focused on creating awareness of opportunities in
eGovernment innovation, establishing PEC Solutions as a leader in this new
category and building the PEC brand.
We market and sell our services through multiple channels by using our
business development staff, leveraging existing client relationships,
capitalizing on our task order contracts, responding to competitive
solicitations, attending marketing events and engaging in other public relations
activities. We employ marketing research services to identify and track
potential contract opportunities. We also cultivate relationships with
leading-edge technology vendors, such as Entrust Technologies and IBM, and prime
contractors, such as Unisys, to identify and obtain project leads consistent
with our capabilities.
We employ a team selling approach, whereby our business developers
collaborate with our service delivery professionals and management to identify
prospects, conduct sales and manage client relationships. Our Vice President of
Strategic Programs coordinates the activities of our business development staff.
We allocate business developers to each of our business units who pursue new
clients and programs across their market segments. Each current client is
assigned to a relationship manager who is responsible for ensuring client
satisfaction and successful project performance, and identifying new business
opportunities with the client.
CULTURE, PEOPLE AND RECRUITING
We have developed a corporate culture that promotes excellence in job
performance, respect for the ideas and judgment of our colleagues and
recognition of the value of the unique skills and capabilities of our
professional staff. We seek to attract highly qualified and ambitious staff. We
strive to establish an environment in which all employees can make their best
personal contribution and have the satisfaction of being part of a unique team.
We believe that we have successfully attracted and retained highly skilled
employees because of the quality of our work environment, the professional
challenge of our assignments, and the financial and career advancement
opportunities we make available to our staff.
We occupy state-of-the art facilities that are conducive to highly technical
and collaborative work, while providing individual privacy. In our solutions
centers, we configure large networks of leading-edge equipment and software, and
provide our engineers and developers with advanced tools to evaluate and apply
new technologies. We believe that the location, environment and amenities
provided by our new Fair Lakes campus facility will contribute to our ability to
attract and retain highly skilled employees.
As of December 31, 2000, we had 588 personnel. Of our total personnel, 513
were consulting and service delivery professionals, and 75 were management and
administrative personnel performing corporate marketing, human resources,
finance, accounting, legal, internal information systems and
8
administrative functions. None of our personnel is represented by a collective
bargaining unit. As of March 16, 2001 comparative numbers were 638, 560 and 78,
respectively.
In addition to standard company benefits, we provide:
- tuition reimbursement for employees pursuing advanced academic degrees;
- professional training programs;
- financial incentives for employees obtaining product competency
certifications;
- a bonus program;
- spot cash awards to reward specific employee accomplishments; and
- stock option grants based on job performance.
We invest heavily in technical staff recruiting resources and hiring
programs. Each of our business units is staffed with a dedicated recruiter, and
we aggressively use a variety of recruiting methods, including advertising, job
fairs, open houses and Internet-based career placement services. We also offer
substantial awards and recognition to our current employees for referrals, which
has been particularly effective in identifying and recruiting talented staff.
We have developed an active and effective college recruiting program that
draws on management staff and recent college hires from across the company to
attract graduating students with strong academic backgrounds in our core
disciplines. We currently target colleges and universities in Washington, D.C.,
Maryland, and Virginia with this program, and perform on-campus recruiting
during the spring and fall recruiting seasons at five universities.
COMPETITION
Our current competitors include, and may in the future include, the
following:
- information technology services providers and large government contractors
such as American Management Systems, Andersen Consulting, Booz, Allen &
Hamilton, Computer Sciences Corporation, Electronic Data Systems, KPMG,
PricewaterhouseCoopers, Science Applications International Corporation and
Unisys; and
- Internet professional services providers.
Many of our competitors have long operating histories and strong client
relationships, greater financial, technical, marketing and public relations
resources, larger client bases and greater brand or name recognition than we
have.
We believe that the major competitive factors in our market relate to a
company's distinctive technical capabilities, successful past contract
performance, reputation for quality and key management and marketing staff.
Under best-value procurement methods, price is an important, but secondary,
factor in the selection of a technology service provider.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
Our success is dependent, in part, upon our proprietary processes,
components and other intellectual property rights. We do not have any patents or
patent applications pending. We rely on a combination of trade secret,
nondisclosure and other contractual agreements, and copyright and trademark
laws, to protect our proprietary rights. Existing trade secret and copyright
laws afford us only limited protection. We enter into confidentiality agreements
with our employees and our contractors and limit access to and distribution of
our proprietary information. There can be no assurance that the steps we have
taken in this regard will be adequate to deter misappropriation of our
9
proprietary information or that we will be able to detect unauthorized use and
take appropriate steps to enforce our intellectual property rights.
A portion of our business involves the development of software applications
for specific client engagements. Although ownership of client-specific software
is generally retained by the client, we retain some rights to the applications,
processes and intellectual property developed in connection with client
engagements.
BACKLOG
Our current funded backlog is approximately $57 million dollars. Our
contracts typically are funded incrementally, and therefore the funded backlog
only represents that portion of the contract value. Funding occurs as work
progresses. Our average contract/task performance period runs between six to ten
months. Our backlog is typically subject to large variations from quarter to
quarter as existing contracts/tasks are renewed or new contracts are awarded.
Additionally, all federal government contracts, whether or not funded, may be
terminated at the convenience of the government.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
We have not incurred any costs associated with environmental issues.
RISK FACTORS
RISK FACTORS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS
SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OF OUR REVENUES WOULD BE THREATENED IF OUR RELATIONSHIPS
WITH AGENCIES OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WERE HARMED. Our largest clients are
agencies of the federal government. If the federal government in general, or any
significant government agency, uses less of our services or terminates its
relationship with us, our revenues could decline substantially, and our business
could be seriously harmed. During 2000, contracts with the federal government
and contracts with prime contractors of the federal government accounted for
approximately 92% of our revenues. During that same period, our ten largest
clients, all agencies of the federal government, generated approximately 61% of
our revenues, with the top five clients accounting for 41% of our revenues. We
believe that federal government contracts are likely to continue to account for
a significant portion of our revenues for the foreseeable future. The volume of
work that we perform for a specific client, however, is likely to vary from year
to year, and a significant client in one year may not use our services as
extensively, or at all, in a subsequent year.
OUR GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS MAY BE TERMINATED PRIOR TO THEIR COMPLETION, AND IF
WE DO NOT REPLACE THEM, OUR OPERATING RESULTS MAY BE HARMED. We derive
substantially all of our revenues from government contracts that typically are
awarded through competitive processes and span a one year base period and one or
more option years. The unexpected termination or nonrenewal of one or more of
our significant contracts could result in significant revenue shortfalls. Our
clients generally have the right not to exercise the option periods. In
addition, our contracts typically contain provisions permitting an agency to
terminate the contract on short notice, with or without cause.
Following termination, if the client requires further services of the type
provided in the contract, there is frequently a competitive rebidding process.
We may not win any particular rebid or be able to successfully bid on new
contracts to replace those that have been terminated. Even if we do win the
rebid, we may experience revenue shortfalls in periods where we anticipated
revenues from the contract rather than its termination and subsequent rebidding.
These revenue shortfalls could harm operating results for those periods.
OUR LACK OF LONG-TERM CONTRACTS WITH CLIENTS AND OUR RELATIVELY FIXED
OPERATING EXPENSES EXPOSE US TO GREATER RISK OF INCURRING LOSSES. Our clients
retain us on an engagement-by-engagement basis, rather than
10
under long-term contracts. We incur costs based on our expectations of future
revenues. Our operating expenses are relatively fixed and cannot be reduced on
short notice to compensate for unanticipated variations in the number or size of
engagements in progress. These factors make it difficult for us to predict our
revenues and operating results. If we fail to predict our revenues accurately,
it may seriously harm our financial condition and results of operation.
A REDUCTION IN OR THE TERMINATION OF OUR SERVICES COULD LEAD TO
UNDERUTILIZATION OF OUR EMPLOYEES AND COULD HARM OUR OPERATING RESULTS. Our
employee compensation expenses are relatively fixed. Therefore, if a client
defers, modifies or cancels an engagement or chooses not to retain us for
additional phases of a project, our operating results will be harmed unless we
can rapidly redeploy our employees to other engagements in order to minimize
underutilization.
FAILING TO MAINTAIN STRONG RELATIONSHIPS WITH PRIME CONTRACTORS COULD RESULT
IN A DECLINE IN OUR REVENUES. We derived approximately 32% of our revenues
during 2000 through our relationships with prime contractors, which, in turn,
have contractual relationships with end-clients. One of our prime contractors,
Unisys, accounted for 14% of our revenues during 2000. We expect to continue to
depend on these relationships for a material portion of our revenues in the
foreseeable future. If any of these prime contractors eliminate or reduce their
engagements with us, or have their engagements eliminated or reduced by their
end-clients, we will lose a source of revenues, which, if not replaced, will
adversely affect our operating results.
WE MUST RECRUIT AND RETAIN QUALIFIED PROFESSIONALS TO SUCCEED IN OUR
LABOR-INTENSIVE BUSINESS. Our future success depends in large part on our
ability to recruit and retain qualified professionals skilled in complex
information technology services and solutions, including encryption and other
security systems. Such personnel are in great demand and are likely to remain a
limited resource in the foreseeable future. Competition for qualified
professionals is intense. Any inability to recruit and retain a sufficient
number of these professionals could hinder the growth of our business.
WE MAY LOSE MONEY ON FIXED-PRICE CONTRACTS IF WE MISCALCULATE THE RESOURCES
WE NEED TO COMPLETE THE CONTRACT. We derived approximately 22% of our revenues
in 2000 from fixed-price contracts. We anticipate a material portion of our
future engagements will continue to be contracted at a fixed price. Unlike time
and materials contracts, for which we are reimbursed based on our actual
expenditures of resources, fixed-price contracts require us to price our
contracts by predicting our expenditures in advance. If we miscalculate the
resources we need to complete fixed-price engagements, our operating results
could be seriously harmed because we are not compensated for the higher costs.
The risk that we may miscalculate the resources we need is higher because we
work with complex technologies in compressed time frames.
WE COULD LOSE REVENUES AND CLIENTS AND EXPOSE OUR COMPANY TO LIABILITY IF WE
FAIL TO MEET CLIENT EXPECTATIONS. We create, implement and maintain technology
solutions that are often critical to our clients' operations. If our technology
solutions or other applications have significant defects or errors or fail to
meet our clients' expectations, we may:
- lose revenues due to adverse client reaction;
- be required to provide additional remediation services to a client at no
charge;
- receive negative publicity, which could damage our reputation and
adversely affect our ability to attract or retain clients; and
- suffer claims for substantial damages against us, regardless of our
responsibility for the failure.
While many of our contracts limit our liability for damages that may arise
from negligent acts, errors, mistakes or omissions in rendering services to our
clients, we cannot be sure that these contractual provisions will protect us
from liability for damages if we are sued. Furthermore, our general liability
insurance coverage may not continue to be available on reasonable terms or in
11
sufficient amounts to cover one or more large claims, or the insurer may
disclaim coverage as to any future claim. The successful assertion of any large
claim against us could seriously harm our business. Even if not successful, such
claims could result in significant legal and other costs and may be a
distraction to management.
SECURITY BREACHES IN SENSITIVE GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS COULD RESULT IN THE LOSS
OF CLIENTS AND NEGATIVE PUBLICITY. Many of the systems we develop involve
managing and protecting information involved in law enforcement and other
sensitive government functions. A security breach in one of these systems could
cause serious harm to our business, could result in negative publicity and could
prevent us from having further access to such critically sensitive systems or
other similarly sensitive areas for other governmental clients. Losses that we
could incur from such a security breach could exceed the policy limits that we
have for "errors and omissions" or product liability insurance.
IF WE CANNOT OBTAIN THE NECESSARY SECURITY CLEARANCES, WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO
PERFORM CLASSIFIED WORK FOR THE GOVERNMENT AND OUR REVENUES MAY SUFFER.
Government contracts require us, and some of our employees, to maintain security
clearances. If we lose or are unable to obtain security clearances, the client
can terminate the contract or decide not to renew it upon its expiration. As a
result, to the extent we cannot obtain the required security clearances for our
employees working on a particular engagement, we may not derive the revenue
anticipated from the engagement, which, if not replaced with revenue from other
engagements, could seriously harm our operating results.
WE DEPEND ON OUR SENIOR MANAGEMENT TEAM, AND THE LOSS OF ANY MEMBER MAY
ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR ABILITY TO OBTAIN AND MAINTAIN CLIENTS. We believe that our
success will depend on the continued employment of our senior management team,
including David Karlgaard, our Chief Executive Officer, Paul Rice, our Chief
Operating Officer and Alan Harbitter, our Chief Technology Officer. We have key
man life insurance policies that cover Messrs. Karlgaard and Rice up to
$1 million and Mr. Harbitter up to $500,000. This dependence is particularly
important to our business because personal relationships are a critical element
of obtaining and maintaining client engagements. If one or more members of our
senior management team was unable or unwilling to continue in their present
positions, such persons would be difficult to replace and our business could be
seriously harmed. Furthermore, clients or other companies seeking to develop
in-house capabilities may hire away some of our key employees. Employee
defections to clients or competitors would not only result in the loss of key
employees but could also result in the loss of a client relationship or a new
business opportunity. Any losses of client relationships could seriously harm
our business.
WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY IDENTIFY, MANAGE AND INTEGRATE FUTURE
ACQUISITIONS, WHICH MAY HARM OUR OPERATING RESULTS. We may use a portion of the
proceeds from this offering to acquire companies or businesses that are
complementary to ours. However, we have no immediate plans or current agreements
to acquire any additional companies or businesses, and we cannot assure you that
we will identify appropriate acquisition candidates. If we do identify an
appropriate acquisition candidate, we cannot assure you that we would be able to
successfully negotiate the terms of an acquisition, finance the acquisition or
integrate the acquired business into our existing business. Negotiations of
potential acquisitions and the integration of an acquired business could disrupt
our business by diverting management away from day-to-day operations. Further,
failure to successfully integrate any acquisition may cause significant
operating inefficiencies and adversely affect our profitability. Consummating a
merger could require us to raise additional funds through additional equity or
debt financing. Additional equity financing could result in further dilution of
the per share value of your stock. Additional debt financing could force us to
accept contractual limitations that could harm our ability to grow.
AUDITS OF OUR GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS MAY RESULT IN A REDUCTION IN REVENUES WE
RECEIVE FROM THOSE CONTRACTS OR MAY RESULT IN CIVIL OR CRIMINAL PENALTIES THAT
COULD HARM OUR REPUTATION. Federal government agencies routinely audit
government contracts. These agencies review a contractor's performance on its
12
contract, pricing practices, cost structure and compliance with applicable laws,
regulations and standards. An audit could result in a substantial adjustment to
our revenues because any costs found to be improperly allocated to a specific
contract will not be reimbursed, while improper costs already reimbursed must be
refunded. If a government audit uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may
be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions,
including termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of
payments, fines and suspension or debarment from doing business with federal
government agencies. In addition, we could suffer serious reputational harm if
allegations of impropriety were made against us.
WE MAY BE LIABLE FOR PENALTIES UNDER A VARIETY OF PROCUREMENT RULES AND
REGULATIONS, AND CHANGES IN GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS COULD SLOW OUR GROWTH OR
REDUCE OUR PROFITABILITY. We must comply with and are affected by federal
government regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance
of government contracts. These regulations affect how we do business with our
clients and may impose added costs on our business. Any failure to comply with
applicable laws and regulations could result in contract termination, price or
fee reductions or suspension or debarment from contracting with the federal
government. Further, the federal government may reform its procurement practices
or adopt new contracting methods relating to the GSA schedule or other
government-wide contract vehicles. If we are unable to successfully adapt to
those changes, our business could be seriously harmed.
OUR FAILURE TO ADEQUATELY PROTECT OUR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND
PROPRIETARY RIGHTS MAY HARM OUR COMPETITIVE POSITION. While our employees
execute confidentiality agreements, we cannot guarantee that this will be
adequate to deter misappropriation of our confidential information. In addition,
we may not be able to detect unauthorized use of our intellectual property in
order to take appropriate steps to enforce our rights. If third parties infringe
or misappropriate our copyrights, trademarks or other proprietary information,
our competitive position could be seriously harmed. In addition, other parties
may assert infringement claims against us or claim that we have violated their
intellectual property rights. Such claims, even if not true, could result in
significant legal and other costs and may be a distraction to management. While
we have applied for trademarks for PEC.com, PEC, PEC Solutions, Web-enabling
Government and the related symbols and designs, we cannot assure you that these
trademarks will be granted.
RISKS FACTORS RELATED TO THE EGOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS MARKET
COMPETITION COULD RESULT IN PRICE REDUCTIONS, REDUCED PROFITABILITY AND LOSS
OF MARKET SHARE. Competition in the market for eGovernment solutions is intense.
If we are unable to differentiate our services from those of our competitors,
our revenue growth and operating margins may decline. Many of our competitors
are larger and have greater financial, technical, marketing and public relations
resources, larger client bases and greater brand or name recognition than us.
Our larger competitors may be able to provide clients with additional benefits,
including reduced prices. We may be unable to meet those prices, which may cause
us to lose business and market share. Alternatively, we could decide to meet the
lower prices, which could harm our profitability. If we fail to compete
successfully, our business could be seriously harmed.
Our current competitors include, and may in the future include, the
following:
- information technology services providers and large government contractors
such as American Management Systems, Andersen Consulting, Booz-Allen &
Hamilton, Computer Sciences Corporation, Electronic Data Systems, KPMG,
PricewaterhouseCoopers, Science Applications International Corporation and
Unisys; and
- Internet professional services providers.
Current and potential competitors also have established or may establish
cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties to increase
their ability to address client needs. Accordingly, it
13
is possible that new competitors or alliances among competitors may emerge and
rapidly acquire significant market share. In addition, some of our competitors
may develop services that are superior to, or have greater market acceptance
than, the services that we offer.
OUR BUSINESS WILL BE HARMED IF GOVERNMENT AGENCIES ARE UNWILLING TO REPLACE
OR SUPPLEMENT EXPENSIVE LEGACY SYSTEMS. Government agencies have spent
substantial resources over an extended period of time to develop computer
systems and to train their personnel to use them. These agencies may be
reluctant to abandon or supplement these legacy systems with Internet and other
advanced technology systems because of the cost of developing them or the
additional cost of re-training their personnel. Such reluctance would make it
more difficult to acquire new engagements which would harm our business
prospects.
OUR GROWTH WILL BE HARMED IF A VIABLE MARKET FOR EGOVERNMENT SERVICES IS NOT
SUSTAINED. We cannot be certain that a viable government market for Internet and
other advanced technology services will be sustainable. If this market is not
sustained and we are unable to refocus our services on the private sector market
or other in-demand technologies, our growth would be negatively affected.
Although government agencies have recently increased focus on and funding for
technology initiatives, we cannot be certain that these initiatives will
continue in the future. Budget cutbacks or political changes could result in a
change of focus or reductions in funding for technology initiatives, which, in
turn, could seriously harm our revenues.
RISKS RELATED TO THE OWNERSHIP OF OUR COMMON STOCK
OUR QUARTERLY REVENUES AND OPERATING RESULTS COULD BE VOLATILE AND MAY CAUSE
OUR STOCK PRICE TO FLUCTUATE. Our quarterly revenues and operating results may
fluctuate significantly in the future. In particular, if the Federal government
does not adopt a budget for its fiscal year beginning on October 1, Federal
agencies may be forced to suspend our contracts due to a lack of funding.
Consequently, we may realize lower revenues in the quarter ending December 31.
Further, the rate at which the Federal government procures technology may be
negatively affected following changes in Presidential administrations and in
senior government officials. As a result, our operating results could be
volatile and difficult to predict and period-to-period comparisons of our
operating results may not be a good indication of our future performance.
A significant portion of our operating expenses, such as personnel and
facilities costs, are fixed in the short term. Therefore, any failure to
generate revenues according to our expectations in a particular quarter could
result in reduced income in the quarter. In addition, our quarterly operating
results may not meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors, which
in turn may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.
OUR OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS WILL OWN 78.8% OF OUR STOCK AND COULD CONTROL
MATTERS SUBMITTED TO STOCKHOLDERS FOR THEIR APPROVAL. Our directors and
executive officers will beneficially own, in the aggregate, 78.8% of our
outstanding common stock. As a result, these stockholders will be able to
exercise control over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the
election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This
concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a
change in control of PEC Solutions.
WE HAVE VARIOUS MECHANISMS IN PLACE THAT MAY PREVENT A CHANGE IN CONTROL
THAT STOCKHOLDERS MAY CONSIDER FAVORABLE. Our certificate of incorporation and
bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of PEC Solutions
that stockholders may consider favorable. Our certificate of incorporation and
bylaws:
- authorize the issuance of blank check capital stock that could be issued
by our board of directors to thwart a takeover attempt;
14
- classify the board of directors into staggered, three-year terms, which
may lengthen the time required to gain control of our board of directors;
- prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors, which would
otherwise allow holders of less than a majority of the stock to elect some
directors;
- require super-majority voting to effect amendments to provisions of our
bylaws concerning the number of directors;
- limit who may call special meetings of stockholders;
- prohibit stockholder action by written consent, requiring all actions to
be taken at a meeting of the stockholders;
- establish advance notice requirements for nominating candidates for
election to the board of directors or for proposing matters that can be
acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings; and
- require that vacancies on the board of directors, including newly-created
directorships, be filled only by a majority vote of directors then in
office.
In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law may
discourage, delay or prevent a change in control by prohibiting PEC Solutions
from engaging in a business combination with an interested stockholder for a
period of three years after the person becomes an interested stockholder. See
"Description of Our Capital Stock--Anti-Takeover Effects of Our Certificate of
Incorporation and Bylaws and Delaware General Corporation Law."
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company's operations occupy approximately 213,000 square feet of space
located in Fairfax, Virginia, Baltimore, Maryland, Denver, Colorado and
Vacaville, California. We also have employees working at client sites throughout
the United States. The large majority of the space is office space, all of which
is leased. For lease commitment information, reference is made to Note 12 to the
accompanying consolidated financial statements. Existing facilities are
considered to be generally suitable and adequate for the Company's present
needs. We have recently entered into a new lease for an additional facility in
our corporate complex in Fairfax, Virginia which will come on line in December
2002 and will replace existing space in Fairfax, Virginia and will provide
additional space for some of the anticipated growth. We are currently in
negotiations to take an equity interest in the new building under this lease.
Based on contracts, it may be necessary in the future to lease additional office
space in other cities located in the United States.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
No information is required by item 3.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No information is required by item 4.
15
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE COMPANY'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
At March 16, 2001, we had approximately 1,981 holders of record of our
common stock. We had 22,493,450 Common Shares outstanding on the Nasdaq National
Market. The Company began trading on the Nasdaq National Market on April 20,
2000.The following high and low sale prices indicated for our Common Stock are
as reported on the Nasdaq National Market during each of the quarters indicated.
HIGH LOW
-------- --------
Fiscal 2000 Quarter Ended:
December 31............................................ $ 8.250 $4.375
September 30........................................... $11.438 $4.500
June 30 (from April 20)................................ $ 12.00 $7.063
During the three months ended December 31, 2000, we sold an aggregate of
60,030 shares of common stock at purchase prices ranging from $0.78 to $1.68 per
share, for an aggregate consideration of $60,185 upon exercise of stock options
granted under our stock option agreement and our nonqualified stock option plan.
For the year ended December 31, 2000, we sold an aggregate of 1,641,828 shares
of common stock at purchase prices ranging from $0.78 to $3.05 per share, for an
aggregate consideration of $1,982,473 upon exercise of stock options granted
under our stock option agreement and our nonqualified stock option plan.
On January 2, 2001, the company sold an aggregate of 76,534 of common stock
at purchase prices of $6.27 and $6.75 per share, for an aggregate consideration
of $515,081 under our employee stock purchase plan.
In April 2000, we commenced and completed a firm commitment underwritten
initial public offering of 3,000,000 shares of our common stock at a price of
$9.50 per share. The shares were registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-95331),
which was declared effective on April 19, 2000. The public offering was
underwritten by a syndicate of underwriters led by Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette
Securities Corporation; Chase Securities Inc. Legg Mason Wood Walker,
Incorporated; and DLJdirect Inc. as their representatives. After deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions of approximately $2 million and expenses
of approximately $0.9 million, we received net proceeds of $25.6 million.
The primary purposes of this offering were to create a public market for our
common stock, to improve the incentive mechanism for our professionals through
stock options, to obtain additional equity capital and to facilitate future
access to public markets. We expect to use the net proceeds from this offering
for general corporate purposes, including working capital. We may also use a
portion of the net proceeds to acquire businesses that are complementary to
ours. On August 28, 2000, we acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of
Viking Technology, Inc. ("Viking") for $2 million cash plus the assumption of
debt in a business combination accounted for as a purchase. Viking is a leading
provider of integrated software and advanced technology solutions for state and
local law enforcement, fire and emergency medical service agencies. Management
will have broad discretion in the allocation of the net proceeds We have no
current plans, agreements or commitments for, and are not currently engaged in
any negotiations with respect to, any transaction. Pending their use, the
proceeds of this offering have been invested in short-term, investment grade,
interest-bearing securities.
16
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
OPERATING RESULTS:
Revenues....................................... $68,305 $53,202 $41,457 $24,630 $16,216
Gross profit (a)............................... 30,996 22,793 17,942 10,754 6,907
Operating income............................... 10,211 8,975 6,891 3,615 2,203
Net income..................................... 7,272 $ 5,639 $ 4,455 2,305 1,452
Earnings per share.............................
Basic...................................... 0.34 0.33 0.26 0.13 0.08
Diluted.................................... 0.30 0.24 0.20 0.10 0.07
FINANCIAL POSITION:
Cash and cash equivalents...................... $14,656 $ 7,981 $ 5,367 $ 4,520 $ 1,708
Working capital................................ 43,182 13,311 9,309 6,781 4,504
Total assets................................... 61,400 24,400 18,271 12,751 7,744
Long-term debt................................. -- -- -- -- --
Total stockholders' equity..................... 50,700 15,283 10,677 7,962 6,011
- ------------------------
(a) Gross profit represents revenues less direct costs, which consist primarily
of project personnel salaries and benefits and direct expenses incurred to
complete projects.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operation section includes "forward-looking statements," within the meaning
of the Federal Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. While
forward-looking statements sometimes presented with numerical specificity, they
are based on various assumptions made by management regarding future
circumstances over many of which we have little or no control. Forward-looking
statements may be identified by words including "anticipate," "believe,"
"estimate," "expect" and similar expressions. We caution readers that
forward-looking statements, including without limitation, those relating to
future business prospects, revenues, working capital, liquidity, and income, are
subject to certain risks and uncertainties that would cause actual results to
differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ from forward-looking
statements include the concentration of our revenues from the U.S. Government
and its agencies and departments (the "Government"), risks involved in
contracting with the Government, difficulties we may have in attracting,
retaining and managing professional and administrative staff, fluctuations in
quarterly results, risks related to acquisitions, risks related to competition
and our ability to continue to win and perform efficiently on Government
contracts, and other risks and factors identified from time to time in the
reports we file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),
including those identified under the caption "Risk Factors" in our registration
statement on Form S-1, (SEC File No. 333-95331.) Should one or more of these
risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove
incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated
or projected.
OVERVIEW
PEC Solutions is a professional services firm specializing in high-end
solutions that help government organizations capitalize on the internet and
other advanced technologies. We migrate paper-intensive procedures to
web-enabled processes using eGovernment solutions and that help our clients
enhance their productivity and improve the services they offer to the public. As
a total solutions provider, we address the full technology lifecycle, including
formulating technology strategies, creating
17
business solutions, performing long-term operational management and continuing
enhancement of the solution.
As part of our growth strategy, we have completed our acquisition of Viking
Technology, Inc. ("Viking") on August 28, 2000. The business combination was
accounted for as a purchase. See "Acquisitions".
We derive substantially all of our revenues from fees for consulting
services. We generate these fees from contracts with various payment
arrangements, including time and materials contracts, fixed-price contracts and
cost-reimbursable contracts. During 2000, revenues from these contract types
were approximately 66%, 22% and 12%, respectively, of total revenues. We expect
this approximate mix of business to continue in 2001. We typically issue
invoices monthly to manage outstanding accounts receivable balances. We
recognize revenues on time and materials contracts as the services are provided.
We recognize revenues on fixed-price contracts using the percentage of
completion method as services are performed over the life of the contract, based
on the costs we incur in relation to the total estimated costs. We recognize and
make provisions for any anticipated contract losses at the time we know and can
estimate them. Fixed-price contracts are attractive to clients, and while
subject to increased risks, provide opportunities for increased margins. We
recognize revenue on cost-reimbursable contracts as services are provided. These
revenues are equal to the costs incurred in providing these services plus a
proportionate amount of the fee earned. We have historically recovered all of
our costs on cost-reimbursable contracts, which means we have lower risk and our
margins are lower on these contracts.
Our historical revenue growth is attributable to various factors, including
an increase in the size and number of projects for existing and new clients.
Existing clients from the previous fiscal year generated approximately 92% of
our revenues in 2000, approximately 96% of our revenues in 1999 and
approximately 95% of our revenues in 1998. We expect business from existing
clients to continue in the 90% range in 2001. We have also expanded our
geographic presence by opening offices in Baltimore, Maryland and Denver,
Colorado. We manage our client development efforts through each of our strategic
service groups, each having specific client responsibility and focus. As of
December 31, 2000, we had 588 personnel and on March 16, 2001 we had 638
personnel.
In 2000, we derived approximately 32% of our revenue through relationships
with prime contractors, who contract directly with the end-client and
subcontract with us. We expect this percentage to increase in 2001 due to our
recent subcontract with EDS. In most of these engagements, we retain full
responsibility for the end-client relationship and direct and manage the
activities of our contract staff.
Our most significant expense is direct costs, which consist primarily of
project personnel salaries and benefits, and direct expenses incurred to
complete projects. Our direct costs as a percentage of revenues are also related
to the utilization rate of our consulting employees. We manage utilization by
frequently monitoring project requirements and timetables. The number of
consulting employees assigned to a project will vary according to the size,
complexity, duration and demands of the project.
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of costs associated
with our executive management, finance and administrative groups, human
resources, unassigned consulting employees, employee training, occupancy costs,
depreciation and amortization, travel and all other branch and corporate costs.
Sales and marketing expenses include the costs of sales and marketing
personnel and costs associated with marketing and bidding on future projects.
Other income consists primarily of interest income earned on our cash, cash
equivalents and marketable securities.
18
ACQUISITIONS
On August 28, 2000, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital
stock of Viking for $2 million cash plus the assumption of debt in a business
combination accounted for as a purchase. Viking is a leading provider of
integrated software and advanced technology solutions to state and local law
enforcement, fire, and emergency medical service agencies. The excess of
purchase price over the fair value of the net assets was approximately
$3.6 million. At the time of the acquisition, Viking had 20 employees.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth certain financial data as a percentage of
total revenues for the periods indicated.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
1998 1999 2000
-------- -------- --------
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Revenues.................................................... 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Direct costs................................................ 56.7 57.2 54.6
----- ----- -----
Gross profit (a)........................................ 43.3 43.8 45.4
Operating costs and expenses:
General and administrative expenses....................... 23.7 22.5 26.0
Sales and marketing expenses.............................. 3.0 3.4 4.1
Amortization of goodwill.................................. 0.0 0.0 0.4
----- ----- -----
Total operating costs and expenses...................... 26.7 26.0 30.5
----- ----- -----
Operating income............................................ 16.6 16.9 14.9
Other income, net........................................... 0.5 0.5 2.8
----- ----- -----
Income from operations before income taxes.................. 17.1 17.4 17.7
Provision for income taxes.................................. 6.4 6.8 7.1
----- ----- -----
Net income.................................................. 10.7% 10.6% 10.6%
===== ===== =====
- ------------------------
(a) Gross profit represents revenues less direct costs, which consist primarily
of project personnel salaries and benefits and direct expenses incurred to
complete projects.
2000 COMPARED WITH 1999
REVENUES. Revenues increased 28.4% to $68.3 million for 2000 from
$53.2 million for 1999. The increase in revenue primarily reflects increases in
the amount of services to existing clients. Our individual tasks average six to
ten months in length and are continually replaced with new tasking from our
clients. We expect our growth rate to increase in 2001.
DIRECT COSTS. Direct costs increased 22.7% to $37.3 million for 2000 from
$30.4 million for 1999. The increase was due primarily to an increase in project
personnel to 513 as of December 31, 2000, as compared to 382 as of December 31,
1999. As a service provider, our direct costs increase in conjunction with our
increased revenues. Direct costs decreased as a percentage of revenues to 54.6%
for 2000, from 57.2% for 1999. The decrease was principally related to normal
fluctuations in labor and other direct costs. We expect the amount of direct
costs to increase in 2001 and as a percentage of revenues to remain comparable
to 2000.
GROSS PROFIT. Gross profit increased 36.0% to $31.0 million for 2000 from
$22.8 million for 1999. Gross profit as a percentage of revenues increased to
45.4% for 2000 from 43.8% for 1999 because
19
revenues grew at a faster rate than direct costs. This increase was principally
related to normal fluctuations in labor and other direct costs. We expect the
amount of gross profits to be approximately 44-45% of revenues in 2001.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. General and administrative expenses
increased 47.9% to $17.7 million for 2000 from $12.0 million for 1999. These
costs, such as rent and other facility costs, recruiting expenses and
depreciation of equipment purchased, were related to the increase in project
personnel. Facilities costs increased for 2000 due to the opening of our new
offices in Fairfax, Virginia. Our total general and administrative headcount
increased to 75 employees as of December 31, 2000, compared to 47 employees as
of December 31, 1999, consistent with our plans. We expect to incur increased
facilities costs in 2001 in connection with opening new offices in San Antonio,
Texas and San Diego, California, as well as, adding additional space in Fairfax,
Virginia. We expect the amount of general and administrative expenses to
increase in 2001, and to be comparable to 2000 as a percentage of revenues.
SALES AND MARKETING. Sales and marketing expenses increased 54.0% to
$2.8 million in 2000 from $1.8 million in 1999. This increase was due to an
increase in our marketing efforts. We expect the amount of sales and marketing
expenses to increase in 2001 and to be comparable to 2000 as a percentage of
revenues.
AMORTIZATION OF GOODWILL. For the year ended December 31, 2000, we incurred
$0.2 million of amortization expense related to the $3.6 million of goodwill we
recorded in connection with the acquisition of Viking.
OPERATING INCOME. Operating income increased 13.8% to $10.2 million for
2000 from $9.0 million for 1999. We expect the amount of operating income in
2001 to be in excess of 10% of revenues.
ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS. We have not incurred any costs in association with
environmental issues and do not anticipate incurring any in calendar year 2001.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 COMPARED WITH YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
REVENUES. Revenues increased 28.3% to $53.2 million for 1999 from
$41.5 million for 1998. The increase in revenue primarily reflects an increase
in the amount of services to existing clients. Our individual tasks average six
to ten months in length and are continually replaced with new tasking from our
clients.
DIRECT COSTS. Direct costs increased 27.3% to $30.4 million for 1999 from
$23.5 million for 1998. The increase was due primarily to an increase in project
personnel to 382 as of December 31, 1999, as compared to 312 as of December 31,
1998. As a service provider, our direct costs increase in conjunction with our
increased revenues. Direct costs increased as a percentage of consulting
services to 57.2% for 1999 from 56.7% in 1998. The increase was principally
related to normal fluctuations in labor and other direct costs.
GROSS PROFIT. Gross profit increased 27.0% to $22.8 million for 1999 from
$17.9 million in 1998. Gross profit as a percentage of revenues decreased to
42.8% for 1999 from 43.3% in 1998 because direct costs grew at a faster rate
than revenues. This resulted from normal fluctuations in labor and other direct
costs.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. General and administrative expenses
increased 22.0% to $12.0 million in 1999 from $9.8 million for 1998. These
expenses grew at a rate less than the growth rate in revenue and direct costs.
These costs, such as rent and other facility costs, recruiting expenses and
depreciation of equipment purchased, were related to the increase in project
personnel. Our total general and administrative headcount increased to 47
employees as of December 31, 1999 compared to
20
34 employees as of December 31, 1998. Facilities costs also increased for 1999
due to the opening of our new offices in Fairfax, Virginia, Baltimore, Maryland
and Denver, Colorado.
SALES AND MARKETING. Sales and marketing expenses increased 49.0% to
$1.8 million in 1999 from $1.2 million in 1998. This increase was due to an
increase in our marketing staff and our marketing efforts.
OPERATING INCOME. Operating income increased 30.3% to $9.0 million for 1999
from $6.9 million for 1998.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Prior to the IPO, we funded our operations primarily through cash generated
from operations and the sale of common stock to employees. Net cash provided by
operating activities was $5.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2000. Cash
provided by operating activities was primarily from net income, adjusted for
working capital changes.
Net cash used by investing activities was $24.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2000. During the year ended December 31, 2000, we purchased
$1.6 million of property and equipment and $21.0 million of short-term
investments. We invested $0.2 million in capitalized software. We also purchased
Viking for $2.0 million in cash plus approximately $0.1 million in acquisition
costs. We received approximately $0.3 million in cash which Viking had at the
time of the transaction.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $25.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2000. During the year ended December 31, 2000, we sold
$28.4 million of common stock and incurred $0.9 million of associated costs in
our IPO. We also sold $0.6 million of common stock through the exercise of
employee stock options. We paid off approximately $2.1 million of debt which we
assumed in the acquisition of Viking.
Although dividends have been paid in prior years, including $0.4 million in
the year ended December 31, 2000, which were accrued at December 31, 1999, we
expect to retain future earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion
of our business and do not anticipate paying any further cash dividends in the
foreseeable future. Under the terms of our stock option agreement and plan, we
have purchased shares of stock from employees upon their termination of
employment. We terminated these terms at the time of the IPO and we will no
longer acquire shares from terminating employees.
We believe that our current cash position is adequate for our short-term and
long-term working capital and capital expenditure needs.
We maintain a $2.7 million line of credit with Bank of America, which bears
interest at the bank's prime rate and expires on April 30, 2001. We expect to
renew our line of credit when it expires. As of December 31, 2000, we had no
borrowings outstanding under the line of credit. We did have outstanding
$1.29 million in letters of credit in lieu of rent deposits.
Under some of our fixed-price contracts, we receive advance payments for
work to be performed in future months. If we do not perform the work, the
unearned portion of these advances will be returned to our clients. By December
31, 2000, our accounts receivable turnover rate, net of advance payments on
contracts, was approximately five times a year. This rate has improved over the
last eight quarters, thus increasing our cash flow.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
None Applicable
21
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The information required by Item 8 of Part II is incorporated herein by
reference to the Consolidated Financial Statements and financial statement
schedules filed with this report: see Item 14 of Part IV.
22
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None
23
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The section entitled "Election of Directors" and "Executive Officers"
appearing in the Registrant's proxy statement for the annual meeting of
stockholders to be held on May 23, 2001, sets forth certain information with
respect to the directors and executive officers of the Registrant and are
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The section entitled "Executive Compensation" appearing in the Registrant's
proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May 23,
2001, sets forth certain information with respect to the compensation of
management of the Registrant and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The section entitled "Stock Ownership" appearing in the Registrant's proxy
statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May 23, 2001,
sets forth information concerning shares of common stock of the Company
beneficially owned by management and others and is incorporated herein by
reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The section entitled "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions"
appearing in the Registrant's proxy statement for the annual meeting of
stockholders to be held on May 23, 2001, sets forth information concerning
certain relationships and transactions with the Company and others and is
incorporated herein by reference.
24
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Documents filed as part of the report:
PAGE
----
1. Consolidated Financial Statements of PEC Solultions, Inc.
and Subsidiary...........................................
a. Report of Independent Accountants...................... F-1
b. Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1999 and F-2
December 31, 2000......................................
c. Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended F-3
December 31, 1998, 1999 and 2000.......................
d. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years F-4
ended December 31, 1998, 1999 and 2000.................
e. Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity and F-5
Comprehensive (Loss) for the years ended December 31,
1998, 1999 and 2000....................................
f. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements............. F-6
2. Supplemental Schedule Relating to the Consolidated
Financial Statements of PEC Solutions, Inc. and
Subsidiary for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1999
and 2000.................................................
a. Report of Independent Accounts......................... S-1
b. Schedule II: Valuation and Qualifying Accounts......... S-2
All Schedules except the one listed above have been omitted because they are
not applicable or not required or because the required information is included
elsewhere in the financial statements in this filing.
(b) Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed or incorporated by reference, as state
below:
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
- --------------------- -----------
3.1* Certificate of Incorporation of PEC Solutions, Inc.
3.2* By-Laws
10.1* Office Lease Agreement between Building IV Associates L.P.
and PEC Solutions, Inc.
10.2* Amendment No. 1 to Office Lease Agreement between Building
IV Associates L.P. and PEC Solutions, Inc.
10.3* Office Lease Agreement between Building V Associates L.P.
and PEC Solutions, Inc.
10.4* Employment Agreement between PEC Solutions, Inc. and David
C. Karlgaard., dated January 1, 2000
10.5* Employment Agreement between PEC Solutions, Inc. and Paul C.
Rice, dated January 1, 2000
10.6* Employment Agreement between PEC Solutions, Inc. and Alan H.
Harbitter, dated January 1, 2000
10.7* Employment Agreement between PEC Solutions, Inc. and Stuart
R. Lloyd, dated December 31, 1998
10.8* 2000 Stock Incentive Plan
10.9* 1995 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan
10.10* 1987 Stock Option Agreement, as amended
10.11* Nonqualified Executive Supplemental Retirement Program
Agreement dated December 1998
10.12* 2000 Employee Stock Option Plan
10.13* Amended and Restated Loan Agreement between PEC Solutions,
Inc. and NationsBank, N.A. (Bank of America)
10.14 Amendment No. 2 to Office Lease Agreement between Building
IV Associates L.P. and PEC Solutions, Inc.
10.15 Amendment No. 3 to Office Lease Agreement between Building
IV Associates L.P. and PEC Solutions, Inc.
10.16 Office Lease Agreement between Building VI L.C. and PEC
Solutions, Inc.
21.1 Subsidiaries of PEC Solutions, Inc.
23.1 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
- --------------------------
* Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form S-1. No. 333-95331.
25
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PEC SOLUTIONS, INC.
By: /s/ DAVID C. KARLGAARD, PH. D.
-----------------------------------------
David C. Karlgaard, PH. D.,
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 23, 2001
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, each person whose signature appears
below in so signing also makes, constitutes and appoints David C. Karlgaard and
Nancy A. Spangler, and each of them acting alone, his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution, for him in any and all
capacities, to execute and cause to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission any and all amendments to this Report, with exhibits thereto and
other documents in connection therewith, and hereby ratifies and confirms all
that said attorney-in-fact or his substitute or substitutes may do or cause to
be done by virtue hereof
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
NAME TITLE DATE
---- ----- ----
Chief Executive Officer,
/s/ DAVID C. KARLGAARD, PH. D. President and Chairman of
------------------------------------------- the Board of Directors March 23, 2001
David C. Karlgaard, PH. D. (Principal Executive
Officer)
Senior Vice President and
/s/ STUART R. LLOYD Chief Financial Officer
------------------------------------------- and Director (Principal March 23, 2001
Stuart R. Lloyd Financial and Accounting
Officer)
/s/ PAUL G. RICE
------------------------------------------- Chief Operating Officer and March 23, 2001
Paul G. Rice Director
/s/ ALAN H. HARBITTER
------------------------------------------- Chief Technology Officer March 23, 2001
Alan H. Harbitter and Director
26
NAME TITLE DATE
---- ----- ----
/s/ JESSE BROWN
------------------------------------------- Director March 23, 2001
Jesse Brown
/s/ FRANK J. CARR
------------------------------------------- Director March 23, 2001
Frank J. Carr
/s/ R. JERRY GROSSMAN
------------------------------------------- Director March 23, 2001
R. Jerry Grossman
/s/ SHARON M. OWLETT
------------------------------------------- Director March 23, 2001
Sharon M. Owlett
27
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
PEC Solutions, Inc.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related
consolidated statements of income, of cash flows and of stockholders' equity
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of PEC
Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") and subsidiary as of December 31, 1999 and 2000,
and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management; our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America which
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
McLean, VA
February 14, 2001
F-1
PEC SOLUTIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
------------------------
AS OF DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------
1999 2000
----------- -----------
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 7,980,635 $14,655,510
Short-term investments.................................... -- 21,016,812
Accounts receivable, net.................................. 13,241,056 15,763,658
Other current assets...................................... 924,493 1,491,186
----------- -----------
Total current assets.................................... 22,146,184 52,927,166
Property and equipment, net................................. 1,506,731 2,585,074
Goodwill, net............................................... -- 3,364,518
Other assets................................................ 746,624 2,522,881
----------- -----------
Total assets............................................ $24,399,539 $61,399,639
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses..................... $ 2,425,426 $ 2,150,060
Advance payments on contracts............................. 1,473,235 1,258,477
Dividends payable......................................... 413,149 --
Retirement plan contribution payable...................... -- 1,937
Accrued payroll........................................... 3,248,532 4,214,089
Accrued vacation.......................................... 902,535 1,182,793
Other current liabilities................................. 372,782 937,930
----------- -----------
Total current liabilities............................... 8,835,659 9,745,286
----------- -----------
Supplemental retirement program liability................... 280,849 482,276
Deferred rent payable....................................... -- 458,852
Other long-term liabilities................................. -- 13,703
----------- -----------
Total long-term liabilities............................. 280,849 954,831
----------- -----------
Total liabilities....................................... 9,116,508 10,700,117
----------- -----------
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity:
Undesignated capital stock, 10,000,000 shares
authorized.............................................. -- --
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 75,000,000 shares
authorized, 17,706,372 and 22,345,440 shares issued and
outstanding, respectively............................... 177,064 223,454
Additional paid-in capital................................ 600,996 28,692,286
Retained earnings......................................... 14,504,971 21,777,437
Accumulated other comprehensive income.................... -- 6,345
----------- -----------
Total stockholders' equity.............................. 15,283,031 50,699,522
----------- -----------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity.............. $24,399,539 $61,399,639
=========== ===========
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
F-2
PEC SOLUTIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
------------------------
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------
1998 1999 2000
----------- ----------- -----------
Revenues.............................................. $41,456,862 $53,202,162 $68,305,025
----------- ----------- -----------
Operating costs and expenses:
Direct costs........................................ 23,514,605 30,409,402 37,309,348
General and administrative expenses................. 9,825,976 11,991,106 17,731,139
Sales and marketing expenses........................ 1,225,629 1,826,297 2,812,888
Goodwill amortization............................... -- -- 240,342
----------- ----------- -----------
Total operating costs and expenses................ 34,566,210 44,226,805 58,093,717
----------- ----------- -----------
Operating income.................................... 6,890,652 8,975,357 10,211,308
Other income, net..................................... 198,829 259,402 1,914,978
----------- ----------- -----------
Income before income taxes.......................... 7,089,481 9,234,759 12,126,286
Provision for income taxes............................ 2,633,995 3,595,347 4,853,820
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income.......................................... $ 4,455,486 $ 5,639,412 $ 7,272,466
=========== =========== ===========
Earnings per share:
Basic............................................... $ 0.26 $ 0.33 $ 0.34
=========== =========== ===========
Diluted............................................. $ 0.20 $ 0.24 $ 0.30
=========== =========== ===========
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
F-3
PEC SOLUTIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
------------------------
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------
1998 1999 2000
---------- ---------- ------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income............................................ $4,455,486 $5,639,412 $ 7,272,466
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation........................................ 663,307 585,194 717,994
Amortization of goodwill............................ -- -- 240,342
Deferred rent payable............................... -- -- 458,852
Deferred income taxes............................... (251,570) (326,091) (384,208)
Other............................................... 7,476 4,540 (179)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities,
excluding those acquired:
Accounts receivable, net.......................... (3,789,614) (2,388,715) (2,078,436)
Other current assets.............................. 232,521 (93,813) (178,502)
Other assets...................................... -- (74,125) (157,047)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses............. 769,194 744,402 (21,882)
Advance payments on contracts..................... (1,291,945) 912,259 (1,276,675)
Retirement plan contribution payable.............. 641,643 (1,224,673) 1,937
Accrued payroll................................... 847,386 490,642 800,199
Accrued vacation.................................. 237,227 187,454 207,302
Other current liabilities......................... 267,737 50,067 467,984
Supplemental retirement program liability......... 105,446 (29,410) 201,427
---------- ---------- ------------
Net cash provided by operating activities....... 2,894,294 4,477,143 6,271,574
---------- ---------- ------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Net purchases of short-term investments............... -- -- (21,001,914)
Purchases of property and equipment................... (882,107) (797,353) (1,614,046)
Proceeds from maturity of investments................. 454,000 -- --
Purchase of subsidiary, net of cash acquired.......... -- -- (1,854,435)
Capitalized software.................................. -- -- (157,462)
Other................................................. 73,267 (20,364) (9,949)
---------- ---------- ------------
Net cash used in investing activities........... (354,840) (817,717) (24,637,806)
---------- ---------- ------------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Dividends paid........................................ (299,965) (347,924) (413,149)
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock............ 262,853 671,706 28,485,321
Payment on note payable............................... -- -- (2,146,280)
Repurchase of common stock............................ (1,655,327) (1,291,658) --
Common stock offering costs........................... -- (77,566) (884,785)
---------- ---------- ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities.................................... (1,692,439) (1,045,442) 25,041,107
---------- ---------- ------------
Net increase in cash.................................... 847,015 2,613,984 6,674,875
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period........ 4,519,636 5,366,651 7,980,635
---------- ---------- ------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period.............. $5,366,651 $7,980,635 $ 14,655,510
========== ========== ============
Property and equipment included in accounts payable..... $ -- $ 121,450 $ --
========== ========== ============
Income taxes paid....................................... $2,923,178 $4,117,808 $ 4,762,550
========== ========== ============
Interest paid........................................... $ -- $ 37,193 $ 141,525
========== ========== ============
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
F-4
PEC SOLUTIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
------------------------
ACCUMULATED
COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL OTHER
---------------------- PAID-IN COMPREHENSIVE RETAINED
SHARES PAR VALUE CAPITAL INCOME EARNINGS TOTAL
---------- --------- ----------- ------------- ----------- -----------
Balance, December 31,
1997..................... 17,991,918 $179,919 $ 369,593 $ -- $ 7,412,120 $ 7,961,632
Issuance of common stock... 371,220 3,712 259,141 -- -- 262,853
Common stock repurchased
and retired.............. (966,948) (9,669) (11,822) -- (1,633,836) (1,655,327)
Dividend declared ($.020
per share)............... -- -- -- -- (347,924) (347,924)
Net income................. -- -- -- -- 4,455,486 4,455,486
---------- -------- ----------- ------ ----------- -----------
Balance, December 31,
1998..................... 17,396,190 173,962 616,912 -- 9,885,846 10,676,720
Issuance of common stock... 793,080 7,931 663,775 -- -- 671,706
Common stock repurchased
and retired.............. (482,898) (4,829) (679,691) -- (607,138) (1,291,658)
Dividend declared ($.023
per share)............... -- -- -- -- (413,149) (413,149)
Net income................. -- -- -- -- 5,639,412 5,639,412
---------- -------- ----------- ------ ----------- -----------
Balance, December 31,
1999..................... 17,706,372 177,064 600,996 -- 14,504,971 15,283,031
Issuance of common stock
and tax impact on
exercise of stock
options.................. 4,639,068 46,390 28,091,290 -- -- 28,137,680
Comprehensive income:
Net income............... -- -- -- -- 7,272,466
Unrealized gain on
securities, net of
taxes.................. -- -- -- 6,345 --
Total comprehensive
income............... -- -- -- -- -- 7,278,811
---------- -------- ----------- ------ ----------- -----------
Balance, December 31,
2000..................... 22,345,440 $223,454 $28,692,286 $6,345 $21,777,437 $50,699,522
========== ======== =========== ====== =========== ===========
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
F-5
PEC SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
------------------------
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
COMPANY
Performance Engineering Corporation (PEC) was incorporated June 25, 1985,
under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. On January 1, 2000, PEC was
reincorporated, under the laws of the state of Delaware, as PEC Solutions, Inc.
("PEC Solutions" or the "Company"). The Company provides professional technology
services that enable government entities to use the Internet to enhance
productivity and improve services to the public. The Company's primary customers
are executive agencies and departments of the Federal government, the Federal
Judiciary, and prime contractors to the United States government. For 1998,
these contracts and subcontracts were time and materials contracts (66%),
fixed-price contracts (19%), and cost reimbursable contracts (15%). For 1999,
these contracts and subcontracts were time and materials contracts (62%),
fixed-price contracts (23%), and cost reimbursable contracts (15%). For 2000,
these contracts and subcontracts were time and materials contracts (66%),
fixed-priced contracts (22%), and cost-reimbursable contracts (12%).
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include all majority-owned or
controlled subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company's revenue is derived primarily from contracts with the Federal
Government. Revenues on time and materials contracts are recognized based on
actual hours delivered at the contracted billable hourly rate plus the cost of
materials incurred. Revenues on fixed-price contracts are recognized using the
percentage-of-completion method based on costs incurred in relation to total
estimated costs. Revenue on cost-type contracts is recognized to the extent of
costs incurred plus a proportionate amount of fee earned. The fees under certain
government contracts may be increased or decreased in accordance with cost or
performance incentive provisions that measure actual performance against
established targets or other criteria. Such incentive fee awards or penalties
are included in revenue at the time the amounts can be reasonably determined.
Provisions for anticipated contract losses are recognized at the time they
become known and estimable.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and in banks. The Company
also considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or
less when purchased to be cash equivalents. As of December 31, 1999 and 2000,
cash equivalents included money market funds of approximately $2,070,383 and
$2,709,483, respectively, and commercial paper of approximately $0 and
$6,793,322, respectively.
CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
At times during the year, the Company maintains cash balances at financial
institutions in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) limits.
Management believes the risk in these situations to be minimal. In addition, the
Company had cash balances of $2,709,483 held in money market funds
F-6
PEC SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
------------------------
at local financial institutions as of December 31, 2000. The Company also held
commercial paper in the amount of $27,810,134 as of December 31, 2000. These
funds are not insured by the FDIC.
MARKETABLE SECURITIES
The Company determines the appropriate classification of marketable
securities at the time of purchase and reevaluates such designation as of each
balance sheet date. The Company's marketable securities are categorized as
available-for-sale and held-to-maturity. Available-for-sale securities are
stated at fair value.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. For
additions prior to January 1, 1999, depreciation is computed on property and
equipment using the double declining balance method over the estimated useful
lives of the assets, generally 3 to 5 years. Effective January 1, 1999,
depreciation is computed on property and equipment using the straight-line
method. Depreciation is computed on leasehold improvements using the
straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term or the useful life of
the respective assets.
LONG-LIVED ASSETS
The Company evaluates the recoverability of its long-lived assets in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting
for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed
of," (SFAS No. 121). SFAS No. 121 requires recognition of impairment of
long-lived assets in the event the net book value of such assets exceeds the
future undiscounted net cash flows attributable to such assets. Impairment, if
any, is recognized in the period of identification to the extent the carrying
amount of an asset exceeds discounted net cash flows attributable to such
assets. Based on its most recent analysis, the Company believes that there was
no impairment of its long-lived assets as of December 31, 2000.
GOODWILL
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over fair value of net
assets acquired. Goodwill is amortized on a straight-line basis over a 5-year
period. Accumulated amortization was $240,342 as of December 31, 2000.
SOFTWARE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS
The Company capitalizes research and development costs for marketable
software incurred from the time the product is determined to be technologically
feasible until it is available for sale. It has also acquired marketable
software, which it has capitalized. Acquired software and software development
costs are amortized using the straight-line method over a period not to exceed
three years.
CONTRACT ADVANCE PAYMENTS
The Company invoices the Federal Government for some of its contracts based
on provisional indirect cost rates. These invoiced amounts are adjusted when the
actual rates have been determined by audit. Other Federal Government contracts
are billed periodically independent of the percentage of the
F-7
PEC SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
------------------------
contract actually completed which, in some situations, results in funds being
advanced to the Company in excess of amounts earned.
COMMON STOCK SPLITS
Effective January 1, 2000, in connection with its reincorporation, the
Company's common stock was split 3-for-1. Effective March 1, 2000, the Company's
common stock was split 2-for-1. All prior share and per share information in the
financial statements have been restated to give effect to these stock splits.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company accounts for stock-based employee compensation arrangements in
accordance with provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," (APB No. 25) and complies with the
disclosure provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," (SFAS No. 123).
INCOME TAXES
The Company accounts for deferred income taxes using the asset and liability
method, under which the expected future tax consequences of timing differences
between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities are recognized as
deferred tax assets and liabilities.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly,
actual results could differ from those estimates.
SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company operates as a single segment and will evaluate additional
disclosure requirements as it expands its operations.
RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior-period financial
statements in order to conform to the 2000 presentation.
2. ACQUISITIONS
On August 28, 2000, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital
stock of Viking Technology, Inc. ("Viking") for $2 million cash plus the
assumption of debt in a business combination accounted for as a purchase. Viking
is a leading provider of integrated software and advanced technology solutions
for state and local law enforcement, fire and emergency medical service
agencies. Assets acquired were $1.8 million and liabilities assumed were
$4.2 million. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net
liabilities assumed was approximately $3.6 million, which was recorded as
goodwill. Pro forma results of operations had the acquisition occurred on
January 1, 1999 would not have been significantly different than reported
results for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 2000.
F-8
PEC SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
------------------------
3. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Accounts receivable consisted of the following as of:
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------
1999 2000
----------- -----------
Billed accounts receivable......................... $11,854,428 $14,597,008
Unbilled accounts receivable....................... 2,255,115 2,448,512
Progress payments.................................. (675,463) (1,103,983)
----------- -----------
13,434,080 15,941,537
Allowance for doubtful accounts.................... (193,024) (177,879)
----------- -----------
Accounts receivable, net........................... $13,241,056 $15,763,658
=========== ===========
Unbilled accounts receivable consist of recognized recoverable costs and
accrued profits on contracts for which billings had not been presented to
clients as of the balance sheet date. Management anticipates the collection of
these amounts within 90 days of the balance sheet date. Payments to the Company
on contracts with agencies and departments of the Federal Government are subject
to adjustment upon audit by the Federal Government. All years subsequent to 1997
are subject to audit. Management believes that audit adjustments, if any, on
periods not yet audited, will not have a material effect on the financial
statements.
4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consisted of the following as of:
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------
1999 2000
----------- ----------
Leasehold improvements.............................. $ 455,480 $1,129,782
Property and equipment.............................. 3,134,027 3,915,907
Software............................................ 383,361 342,426
----------- ----------
3,972,868 5,388,115
Less: accumulated depreciation...................... (2,466,137) (2,803,041)
----------- ----------
$ 1,506,731 $2,585,074
=========== ==========
Depreciation expense was $663,307, $585,194 and $717,994 for the years ended
December 31, 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively.
5. NOTE PAYABLE
The Company has a loan agreement with Bank of America which provides for a
line of credit with a limit of $2,700,000 at the prime rate charged by the bank
(8.5% and 9.5% as of December 31, 1999 and 2000, respectively). The note is
collateralized by the accounts receivable of the Company. As of December 31,
1999 and 2000, the balance due under the line was zero. The bank has issued
Letters of Credit in the amount of $1,289,875 against the line. The agreement
expires April 30, 2001.
F-9
PEC SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
------------------------
6. STOCK OPTION PLANS
On February 1, 1987, the Company established an incentive stock option
agreement (the "agreement"), to attract, retain and reward employees and on
January 1, 1995 the Company established a nonqualified stock option plan (the
"plan", collectively "the plans") to attract, retain and reward key employees.
The plans are administered by the Board of Directors, which has the authority to
determine which officers and key employees are awarded options pursuant to the
plans and the related terms and option prices. The number of options available
for grant under the plans is limited to the number of Company common shares
authorized and available.
Each stock option granted pursuant to the plans has an exercise price equal
to the fair market value of the underlying common stock at the date of grant.
Each stock option granted under the agreement has a five-year term and a
two-year vesting period. Each stock option granted pursuant to the plan has a
ten-year term and no vesting period.
In January 2000, the Company established a stock incentive plan (the "2000
Plan"). Under the 2000 Plan, options to purchase 1,500,000 shares of common
stock are available for 2000. Beginning in 2001, the number of options eligible
for grant in each year will be equal to the sum of 6.25% of the number of
outstanding shares on January 1 of that year, plus the number of shares eligible
for grant in the prior year that were not granted. No more than 15,000,000
options may be granted during the 10-year term of the 2000 Plan.
In January 2000, the Company established an employee stock purchase plan
(the "Purchase Plan"). Under the Purchase Plan, employees, through payroll
deductions, are granted options to purchase shares of common stock at a price no
less 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the first or last
trading day of each six month option period or the date the shares of common
stock are purchased. There are 2,000,000 shares of common stock available for
purchase under the Purchase Plan. On January 2, 2001, 76,534 shares were issued
under the plan at prices ranging from $6.27 to $6.75 per share.
F-10
PEC SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
------------------------
The following table summarizes the Company's activity for all of its stock
option awards granted under the plans:
WEIGHTED-
RANGE OF AVERAGE
NUMBER OF EXERCISE EXERCISE
OPTIONS PRICE PRICE
---------- ------------------ ---------
Balance, December 31, 1997................. 3,892,890 $ 0.56- 1.21 $0.93
Granted.................................... 1,748,160 1.69- 2.06 1.88
Exercised.................................. (371,220) 0.57- 0.78 0.71
Canceled................................... (27,870) 0.57- 1.69 1.37
---------- ------------------ -----
Balance, December 31, 1998................. 5,241,960 0.56- 2.06 1.26
Granted.................................... 1,511,550 2.84- 3.18 3.03
Exercised.................................. (793,080) 0.56- 3.05 0.84
Canceled................................... (291,540) 0.57- 2.84 1.85
---------- ------------------ -----
Balance, December 31, 1999................. 5,668,890 0.63- 3.18 1.76
Granted.................................... 647,793 6.94-12.00 8.91
Exercised.................................. (1,639,068) 0.78- 1.68 1.21
Canceled................................... (101,760) 1.10-12.00 6.10
---------- ------------------ -----
Balance, December 31, 2000................. 4,575,855 $ 0.63-12.00 $2.87
The following table summarizes additional information about stock options
outstanding as of December 31, 2000:
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
------------------------------------ -----------------------
WEIGHTED-
AVERAGE WEIGHTED- WEIGHTED-
REMAINING AVERAGE AVERAGE
NUMBER OF CONTRACTUAL EXERCISE NUMBER EXERCISE
RANGE OF EXERCISE PRICES OPTIONS LIFE (YEARS) PRICE EXERCISABLE PRICE
- ------------------------ --------- ------------ --------- ----------- ---------
$0.63 to $0.86........................... 453,006 0.92 $ 0.83 453,006 $0.83
$0.92 to $1.21........................... 1,061,244 2.01 1.20 1,061,244 1.20
$1.69 to $2.06........................... 1,107,516 3.28 1.89 1,107,516 1.89
$2.67 to $3.18........................... 1,358,046 4.09 3.04 803,862 3.12
$6.94 to $12.00.......................... 596,043 9.33 8.86 213,453 8.21
--------- ----- --------- --------- -----
4,575,855 2.63 $ 2.87 3,639,081 $2.20
========= ===== ========= ========= =====
The Company applies APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in
accounting for its plans. Accordingly, compensation cost is recognized for its
stock plans based on the intrinsic value of the stock option at date of grant
(i.e., the difference between the exercise price and the fair value of the
Company's common stock).
Had compensation cost for the Company's stock-based compensation plans been
determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under the plans
in 1998, 1999, and 2000, consistent with
F-11
PEC SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
------------------------
the method of SFAS No.123, the Company's net income and net income per share
would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below.
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------
1998 1999 2000
---------- ---------- ----------
Net income, as reported.................................. $4,455,486 $5,639,412 $7,272,466
Pro forma compensation expense........................... (353,600) (389,108) (1,102,213)
---------- ---------- ----------
Pro forma net income..................................... $4,101,886 $5,250,304 $6,170,253
========== ========== ==========
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------
1998 1999 2000
-------- -------- --------
Net income per common share--basic:
As reported............................................... $0.26 $0.33 $0.34
Pro forma................................................. $0.24 $0.31 $0.29
Net income per common share--diluted:
As reported............................................... $0.20 $0.24 $0.30
Pro forma................................................. $0.18 $0.22 $0.26
The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. All significant assumptions and the
weighted-average fair value per share granted during the years ended December 31
are as follows:
STOCK
STOCK OPTION PLANS PURCHASE
--------------------------- PLAN
1998 1999 2000 2000
------- -------- -------- --------
Expected volatility.................... 0% 0% 20% 20%
Risk free interest rates............... 5.4% 5.6% 5.17% 5.00%
Dividend yield......................... 3.6% 2.7% 0% 0%
Expected lives......................... 5 years 5 years 10 years .7 years
Weighted average fair value per
share................................ $0.43 $0.36 $4.09 $1.28
7. BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic net income per common share is computed on the basis of the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the periods. Diluted
net income per common share includes the weighted-average effect of dilutive
options outstanding during the periods. The weighted average number of shares
issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options assumes that the
applicable proceeds from such exercises are used to acquire treasury shares at
the average price of common stock during the periods.
F-12
PEC SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
------------------------
Basic and diluted earnings per share for 1998, 1999, and 2000, were
determined as follows:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
------------------------------------
NET INCOME SHARES PER SHARES
---------- ---------- ----------
Basic EPS.................................. $4,455,486 17,204,352 $0.26
Effect of dilutive options................. -- 5,101,692 (0.06)
---------- ---------- -----
Diluted EPS................................ $4,455,486 22,306,044 $0.20
========== ========== =====
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
------------------------------------
NET INCOME SHARES PER SHARES
---------- ---------- ----------
Basic EPS.................................. $5,639,412 17,074,536 $0.33
Effect of dilutive options................. -- 6,383,220 (0.09)
---------- ---------- -----
Diluted EPS................................ $5,639,412 23,457,756 $0.24
========== ========== =====
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
------------------------------------
NET INCOME SHARES PER SHARES
---------- ---------- ----------
Basic EPS.................................. $7,272,466 21,112,760 $0.34
Effect of dilutive options................. -- 2,784,215 (0.04)
---------- ---------- -----
Diluted EPS................................ $7,272,466 23,896,975 $0.30
========== ========== =====
8. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN
During 1985, the Company established a qualified profit sharing plan in
accordance with Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Service Code. Under the
plan, the Company makes contributions out of profits of the Company based on an
amount determined at the discretion of the Board of Directors of the Company.
All full-time employees and part-time employees working at least 20 hours a week
are eligible to participate in the plan. Eligibility is restricted for new
employees, whom are not permitted to participate until the first day of the
first calendar quarter following date of hire. The Company contributed
$1,224,673, $1,226,316 and $1,714,364 for 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively.
9. SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PROGRAM
In December 1998, the Company adopted a funded Executive Supplemental
Retirement Program for a select group of management or highly compensated
employees. The program allows these employees to defer a portion of their salary
and bonus. The Company has the option of adding additional amounts of deferred
compensation at its sole discretion. The Company contributions are vested after
five years. No employee deferrals were made in 1998. In 1999, employee deferrals
were $60,093 and in 2000, they were $72,163. The Company contributed $105,446,
$99,367 and $112,663 to the program in 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively.
10. DIVIDENDS
The Company declared dividends in the amount of $413,149 for 1999, which
were paid in 2000, but did not declare any dividends for 2000. The Company
expects to retain future earnings, if any, for
F-13
PEC SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
------------------------
use in the operation and expansion of the business and does not anticipate
paying any further cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
11. INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes consisted of the following:
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------
1998 1999 2000
---------- ---------- ----------
Current:
Federal................................ $2,429,361 $3,301,488 $4,270,065
State.................................. 456,204 619,950 826,929
---------- ---------- ----------
Total Current............................ 2,885,565 3,921,438 5,096,994
---------- ---------- ----------
Deferred:
Federal................................ (211,684) (304,732) (204,111)
State.................................. (39,886) (21,359) (39,063)
---------- ---------- ----------
Total Deferred........................... (251,570) (326,091) (243,174)
---------- ---------- ----------
Provision for income tax................. $2,633,995 $3,595,347 $4,853,820
========== ========== ==========
Deferred tax assets were comprised of the following:
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------
1998 1999 2000
-------- -------- ----------
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Accrued vacation.......................... $217,974 $298,974 $ 354,531
Allowance for doubtful accounts........... 25,079 76,206 70,227
Property and equipment.................... 98,734 224,162 (3,619)
Capital loss carryforward................. 8,734 8,021 8,021
Deferred rent............................. -- -- 180,539
Unrealized gains on securities............ -- -- (4,057)
Net operating loss carry forward.......... -- -- 876,761
Deferred compensation..................... 41,630 110,879 202,045
-------- -------- ----------
Total deferred tax assets, net.............. $392,151 $718,242 $1,684,448
======== ======== ==========
A reconciliation between the Company's statutory tax rate and the effective
tax rate is as follows:
YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
1998 1999 2000
-------- -------- --------
Statutory federal rate..................................... 34% 34% 35%
State income taxes, net of federal benefits................ 3% 5% 5%
-- -- --
Effective tax rate......................................... 37% 39% 40%
== == ==
F-14
PEC SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
------------------------
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company leases office facilities and equipment under noncancelable
operating lease agreements, which expire in various years through 2013. Future
minimum lease payments under operating leases that have noncancelable lease
terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 2000 are as follows:
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
- ------------------------
2001........................................................ $ 4,569,136
2002........................................................ 4,441,157
2003........................................................ 3,349,674
2004........................................................ 3,425,791
2005........................................................ 3,505,779
Thereafter.................................................. 31,285,751
-----------
$50,577,288
===========
The total rental expense under operating leases was $1,333,455, $2,169,811
and $4,267,350 for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1999 and 2000,
respectively.
The Company subleases space in one of its facilities. Sublease rental income
was $182,745 for the year ended December 31, 2000.
The Company entered into a new lease for a facility to be built-to-suit,
which will be ready to occupy December 1, 2002. The lease will expire on
December 31, 2018. The terms of the lease will be finalized when the final cost
of the building is determined. The Company is negotiating for an equity position
in the building.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company may be party to various
legal proceedings. In the opinion of management, the Company's liability, if
any, in all pending litigation or other legal proceedings will not have a
material effect upon the financial condition, results of operations or liquidity
of the Company.
F-15
PEC SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
------------------------
13. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE
DATA)
UNAUDITED
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
2000 QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER
- ---- -------- -------- -------- --------
Revenues................................................ $15,582 $16,614 $17,695 $18,414
======= ======= ======= =======
Operating income........................................ $ 2,198 $ 2,353 $ 3,072 $ 2,589
======= ======= ======= =======
Net income.............................................. $ 1,413 $ 1,744 $ 2,264 $ 1,854
======= ======= ======= =======
Earnings per share:
Basic................................................. $0.08 $0.08 $0.10 $0.08
======= ======= ======= =======
Diluted............................................... $0.06 $0.07 $0.09 $0.08
======= ======= ======= =======
Weighted average shares used in computing earnings per
share:
Basic................................................. 18,257 21,583 22,275 22,305
======= ======= ======= =======
Diluted............................................... 23,442 24,879 25,285 24,684
======= ======= ======= =======
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
1999 QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER
- ---- -------- -------- -------- --------
Revenues................................................ $11,813 $13,386 $13,394 $14,609
======= ======= ======= =======
Operating income........................................ $ 1,455 $ 2,349 $ 2,468 $ 2,704
======= ======= ======= =======
Net income.............................................. $ 932 $ 1,465 $ 1,569 $ 1,664
======= ======= ======= =======
Earnings per share:
Basic................................................. $0.05 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10
======= ======= ======= =======
Diluted............................................... $0.04 $0.07 $0.08 $0.07
======= ======= ======= =======
Weighted average shares used in computing earnings per
share:
Basic................................................. 17,156 16,979 17,039 17,128
======= ======= ======= =======
Diluted............................................... 23,645 19,907 20,113 23,379
======= ======= ======= =======
F-16
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
To Board of Directors and
Stockholders of PEC Solutions, Inc.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our
report dated February 14, 2001, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K,
also included an audit of the financial statement schedule appearing on
page S-2. In our opinion, this financial statement schedule presents fairly, in
all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in
conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements.
/s/ Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP
McLean, Virginia
February 14, 2001
S-1
PEC SOLUTIONS, INC.
SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E
- ---------------------- --------------- --------------------------------- ---------- -------------
ADDITIONS
---------------------------------
CHARGED/
BALANCE AT CHARGED TO COSTS CREDITED TO BALANCE AT
DESCRIPTION START OF PERIOD AND EXPENSES OTHER ACCOUNTS DEDUCTIONS END OF PERIOD
- ----------- --------------- ---------------- -------------- ---------- -------------
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998
Allowance for
doubtful
accounts.......... $ 69,396 $ 5,071 $ -- $ -- $ 74,467
-------- -------- ------- ------- --------
$ 69,396 $ 5,071 $ -- $ -- $ 74,467
======== ======== ======= ======= ========
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999
Allowance for
doubtful
accounts.......... $ 74,467 $125,417 $ -- $ 6,860(1) $193,024
-------- -------- ------- ------- --------
$ 74,467 $125,417 $ -- $ 6,860 $193,024
======== ======== ======= ======= ========
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
Allowance for
doubtful
accounts.......... $193,024 $ -- $ -- $15,145(1) $177,879
-------- -------- ------- ------- --------
$193,024 $ -- $ -- $15,145 $177,879
======== ======== ======= ======= ========
- ------------------------
(1) Reflects amounts written off against the allowance and related accounts
receivable accounts and settlement of doubtful accounts.
S-2