Back to GetFilings.com
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(Mark One)
(X) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000
OR
( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACTOF 1934
For the transition period from ______ to ______
Commission file number: 000-27127
------------------------
IBASIS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 04-3332534
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
20 SECOND AVENUE, BURLINGTON, MA 01803
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(781) 505-7500
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
------------------------
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE PER SHARE
(Title of Class)
------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes /X/ No / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-X is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. / /
The aggregate market value of the registrant's common stock, $0.001 par
value per share ("Common Stock"), held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of
February 20, 2001 was approximately $118,740,529 based on 23,606,467 shares held
by such non-affiliates at the closing price of a share of Common Stock of $5.03
as reported on the Nasdaq National Market on such date. Affiliates of the
Company (defined as officers, directors and owners of 10 percent or more of the
outstanding share of Common Stock) owned 10,659,668 shares of Common Stock
outstanding on such date. The number of outstanding shares of Common Stock of
the Company on February 20, 2001 was 34,266,135.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant's definitive Proxy Statement to be delivered to
stockholders in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on
May 31, 2001, are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof. With the
exception of the portions of such Proxy Statement expressly incorporated into
this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference, such Proxy Statement shall not be
deemed filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IBASIS, INC.
FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
------------------------------------------------------------ --------
PART I
Item 1. Business.................................................... 3
Item 2. Properties.................................................. 18
Item 3. Legal Proceedings........................................... 18
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders......... 18
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters....................................... 19
Item 6. Selected Financial Data..................................... 20
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations................................. 21
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk...................................................... 42
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data................. 43
PART III
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure.................................. 66
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.......... 66
Item 11. Executive Compensation...................................... 66
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management................................................ 66
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.............. 66
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form
8-K....................................................... 66
Signatures ............................................................ 70
THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND THE DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
CONTAIN FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS BASED ON CURRENT EXPECTATIONS, ESTIMATES AND
PROJECTIONS ABOUT IBASIS'S INDUSTRY AND MANAGEMENT'S BELIEFS AND ASSUMPTIONS. IN
SOME CASES YOU CAN IDENTIFY THESE STATEMENTS BY FORWARD-LOOKING WORDS SUCH AS
"ANTICIPATE," "BELIEVE," "COULD," "ESTIMATE," "EXPECT," "INTEND," "MAY,"
"SHOULD," "WILL," AND "WOULD" OR SIMILAR WORDS. YOU SHOULD READ STATEMENTS THAT
CONTAIN THESE WORDS CAREFULLY BECAUSE THEY DISCUSS FUTURE EXPECTATIONS, CONTAIN
PROJECTIONS OF FUTURE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OR OF FINANCIAL POSITION OR STATE
OTHER "FORWARD-LOOKING" INFORMATION. THE IMPORTANT FACTORS LISTED IN THE SECTION
CAPTIONED "RISK FACTORS," AS WELL AS ANY CAUTIONARY LANGUAGE IN THIS ANNUAL
REPORT, PROVIDE EXAMPLES OF RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES AND EVENTS THAT MAY CAUSE THE
ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THE EXPECTATIONS DESCRIBED IN THESE
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. YOU SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THE OCCURRENCE OF THE
EVENTS DESCRIBED IN THESE RISK FACTORS AND ELSEWHERE IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT COULD
HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE BUSINESS, RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL
POSITION OF IBASIS.
ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT ARE NOT GUARANTEES OF
FUTURE PERFORMANCE, AND ACTUAL RESULTS, DEVELOPMENTS AND BUSINESS DECISIONS MAY
DIFFER FROM THOSE ENVISAGED BY THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, POSSIBLY
MATERIALLY. IBASIS DISCLAIMS ANY DUTY TO UPDATE ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS,
EVEN IF NEW INFORMATION BECOMES AVAILABLE OR OTHER EVENTS OCCUR IN THE FUTURE.
2
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
COMPANY OVERVIEW
We are a leading provider of advanced Internet-based communications services
that enable telecommunications carriers and other communications service
providers to offer international voice, fax and other enhanced services that
combine the flexibility and power of the Internet with the simplicity and
ubiquity of the telephone. By outsourcing international communications services
to us, our customers are able to lower costs, generate new revenue and quickly
extend their business into Internet-based communications services while
maintaining service quality comparable to that of traditional voice networks. We
have deployed our VoCore hosted unified communications solution that permits our
customers to offer a communications solution that unifies the storage of and
access to email and voicemail messages as well as faxes. In addition, we are
currently working on developing a global communications infrastructure, which we
call the Global Spoken Web initiative, for voice sites, voice portals and
corporations providing speech-enabled on-line services.
On December 12, 2000, we entered into a merger agreement with
PriceInteractive, Inc. of Reston, Virginia, pursuant to which PriceInteractive
will be merged with and into our wholly-owned subsidiary, iBasis Speech
Solutions, Inc. (formerly Penguin Acquisition Corp.). This merger is subject to
specific conditions, including receipt of approval by iBasis stockholders of our
issuance of the common shares required to consummate the merger and is expected
to close in the first quarter of 2001.
Founded in 1997, PriceInteractive is a recognized interactive voice response and
speech application service provider to Fortune 500 enterprises,
telecommunications carriers and operators of e-commerce sites and portals.
PriceInteractive also provides a line of interactive voice response services
under the name IPort. PriceInteractive's mission is to voice-enable the Internet
economy by rapidly extending Web-based applications to telephones and wireless
devices. PriceInteractive recently announced its high capacity flagship service,
SpeechPort, which makes available "Web-bound" content, customer relationship
management applications and e-commerce opportunities to wireless and fixed
telephones through an advanced speech recognition interface. PriceInteractive
believes that SpeechPort is one of the first hosted services specifically
focused on bringing Web content to telephones and wireless devices. Initial
customers include AT&T, WorldCom, MicroStrategy and Palm/Anyday.com. SpeechPort
enables ubiquitous access to business information in support of e-business,
e-commerce, e-customer relationship management, or ERP initiatives. Although the
service is designed primarily to extend Web-based applications, it also provides
the ability to extend legacy applications to the telephone.
By connecting these services to the iBasis Network, with its global reach and
significantly-reduced network costs, we intend to increase the value and scope
of the solutions PriceInteractive provides to its large enterprise and carrier
customers. We believe this expanding portfolio of comprehensive, outsourced
solutions will enable the combined companies' enterprise and service provider
customers to affordably extend global access to customer service solutions from
mobile and fixed phones anywhere in the world. We view the acquisition of
PriceInteractive as an important step in our strategy to enhance the
capabilities of our global voice-over Internet infrastructure with new,
speech-enabled services.
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
TELECOMMUNICATIONS MARKET OVERVIEW. According to the Gartner Group, a leading
market research firm, the global telecommunications market is expected to grow
to approximately $1.9 trillion by 2003. Global deregulation and rapid
technological advances have resulted in the emergence of many new communications
service providers, increased competition among traditional telecommunications
carriers, lower prices, innovative new services and accelerated customer
turnover. In their efforts to add and retain customers, communications service
providers are looking for ways to cut costs and offer
3
compelling new services, many of which cannot be deployed over traditional
telephone networks, but instead require a Voice-over-Internet-Protocol, or VoIP,
infrastructure.
INTERNATIONAL LONG DISTANCE MARKET. The international long distance market is a
large and growing segment of the telecommunications market. According to
TeleGeography, a market research firm, the total market for international long
distance services in 1997 was approximately $65.9 billion. International Data
Corporation expects international long distance traffic to grow from
94.9 billion minutes in 1998 to 187.1 billion minutes in 2002. We believe that
this growth will accelerate as countries around the world continue to deregulate
their telecommunication markets.
EMERGENCE OF INTERNET TELEPHONY AND NEW SERVICES. Although it has been possible
to transmit voice over Internet-Protocol, or IP, data networks since 1995, only
recently has the technology improved such that phone-to-phone calls can be
transmitted over data networks with quality approaching that of traditional
voice networks. In addition, International Data Corporation projects that
worldwide Internet telephony will grow from $0.5 billion in 1999, to
$18.7 billion in 2004, approximately half of which would be generated by new
services, including voice-enabled e-commerce and other enhanced services.
International Data Corporation estimates that revenues from unified
communications services will grow to $5.7 billion in 2004. Many
telecommunications carriers are realizing the need to offer enhanced services to
their customers in an effort to reduce customer turnover and increase the
minutes of voice traffic carried on their network. We believe it has become
increasingly important for telecommunications carriers to offer more than just
network infrastructure.
Using Internet telephony to complete calls offers communications service
providers comparable quality call completion along with the ability to offer new
enhanced services. Some of Internet telephony's principal advantages include:
- TECHNOLOGICAL EFFICIENCIES. Traditional voice networks use
circuit-switching technology, which establishes dedicated lines between an
originating and terminating point for the duration of a call. In contrast,
Internet telephony is based on packet-switching technology. This
technology completes a call by digitizing and dividing a speaker's voice
into small packets that travel to their destination along lines carrying
packets of other Internet traffic. Packets from multiple calls or faxes
can be carried over the same line simultaneously with data from other
sources, in part because there are gaps or silence in human conversation,
which results in a higher utilization of transmission lines than can be
achieved with circuit-switching technology. Unlike circuit-switched
traffic, data packets also can be compressed, which means that Internet
telephony uses less bandwidth per call than traditional circuit-switched
calling. As a result of these features, calls can be completed at a lower
cost using Internet telephony. We believe that packet-switched networks,
including the Internet, will allow other traditional services to be
offered more cost-effectively as well.
- ECONOMIES OF SCALE. Internet telephony calls are carried over large and
rapidly growing data networks. Businesses recently have spent billions of
dollars to upgrade their data networks to accommodate dramatic increases
in data traffic. According to TeleGeography, the total bandwidth used for
data surpassed that used for voice in the United States long distance
market in 1998. This growth is driven largely by continuing technological
innovation and the rapid expansion of the Internet as a global medium for
communications and commerce. As data networks continue to grow,
communications service providers should benefit from greater economies of
scale and be able to offer Internet-based services, such as Internet
telephony, more cost effectively than services delivered over traditional
voice networks.
- OPPORTUNITY TO BY-PASS INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENT RATES. Traditional
international long distance calls are completed over international voice
networks. These networks are often owned by government bodies or
telecommunications carriers who charge settlement rates or tariffs for
their use. Although these fees are being reduced or eliminated,
international calls routed over
4
the Internet bypass a significant portion of these fees, and as a result
can generally be completed at lower cost.
- ADDITIONAL CHANNEL FOR CARRIERS. Even the world's largest carriers
regularly outsource their voice and fax traffic, to take advantage of the
lowest-cost provider to a particular destination, and partner with
companies that can provide additional communications channels. Internet
telephony offers an opportunity for service providers with access to the
necessary VoIP technology to develop networks that can provide these
additional channels.
- MORE SERVICES AND EASIER ROLL OUT. In contrast to the closed, proprietary
structure inherent in traditional circuit-switched voice networks,
Internet telephony embraces an open architecture and open standards, which
facilitates innovation at lower costs. Traditional voice networks have
been designed specifically to provide one basic service, making it
difficult to introduce new services over those networks. In contrast, data
networks convert all services into data packets, and allow for the
introduction of a wide and enhanced variety of packet-based services that
were not possible over the traditional network. Since the roll-out of new
services does not necessitate network-wide upgrades, it is easier for
communications service providers to deploy new services quickly. While
voice and fax are the dominant services provided today, additional
services, such as Internet call-waiting, unified messaging, unified
communications, speech applications and IP-based conferencing, can be
provided over data networks.
DEMAND FOR INTERNET TELEPHONY SOLUTIONS. While there are many reasons for
telecommunications carriers and other communications service providers to take
advantage of Internet telephony, for the most part, they have been slow to
establish in-house Internet telephony capability for a number of reasons. These
reasons may include:
- lack of adequate Internet telephony technology until recently;
- lack of trained and experienced IP engineering talent;
- prior substantial investment in circuit-switched networks and the
associated expertise;
- a hesitation to build new networks and cannibalize traffic from their
traditional voice networks; and
- concerns over quality and or reliability.
Developing an international Internet telephony network for a substantial portion
of a communications service provider's traffic would also be expensive and
time-consuming, requiring each service provider to negotiate agreements in each
country where it would like to be able to complete calls. Therefore, many
communications service providers are looking to outsource their Internet
telephony services.
To date, however, few Internet telephony providers have been able to offer the
quality, reliability and back-office support necessary to meet the larger
carriers' strict requirements. In addition, most Internet telephony providers do
not have the international presence to be able to complete calls to a sufficient
number of destinations and do not have the capacity to carry the volume of
traffic required by carriers to any given location.
DEMAND FOR UNIFIED MESSAGING SOLUTIONS. Service providers, such as competitive
local exchange carriers and wireless communications providers, face increased
competition, falling margins and growing customer turnover. Unified messaging
offers a higher-margin value-added service that provides service providers the
ability to attract new customers while retaining their current customer base.
DEMAND FOR SPEECH-ENABLED ON-LINE SERVICES. An increasing number of companies
are deploying speech recognition technology on servers connected to a telephone
as an interface to the public in an effort to reduce the costs of operating call
centers while providing new and existing high quality customer,
5
business and employee services available globally, regardless of time of day or
local time zone. In addition, a new class of Internet portal, which provides
access to speech-enabled Internet sites and speech-enabled business applications
and intranets via wireless and wireline telephones, is being deployed in the
U.S. and abroad.
THE IBASIS SOLUTION
As our core business, we provide advanced Internet-based communication services
to telecommunications carriers and other communications service providers. Our
solution enables communications service providers to outsource their
international voice, fax and other enhanced services over the Internet at
substantially lower costs than over traditional networks while maintaining a
high quality of service. We provide our customers access to the iBasis Network,
our international, scaleable, standards-based Internet telephony network,
through "Internet branch offices," as described under "The iBasis Network"
below, strategically located in major cities in the U.S., Asia, Latin America,
Europe and Africa. Our services provide the following key benefits to our
customers:
HIGH QUALITY VOICE AND FAX TRANSMISSIONS. Our network and proprietary
technology enables us to complete international voice and fax calls with quality
comparable to that of traditional circuit-switched voice networks. This is
supported by the fact that carriers are able to provide our Internet telephony
services to their customers undifferentiated from their traditional services.
Through our global network operations center and proprietary Assured Quality
Routing software, we are able to monitor our network and re-route traffic over
alternative Internet backbone connections, dedicated private lines or
traditional circuit-switched lines when necessary to maintain high quality. This
enables us to provide consistently high quality services to communications
service providers.
COST EFFECTIVE SOLUTIONS. Our transmission costs are lower because packet
switching is more efficient than traditional circuit switching. In addition, we
leverage the Internet to deliver traffic, which results in lower costs than
transmission alternatives that deploy dedicated connections. Our packet-based
scaleable solution also allows us to better match our investment in equipment
with capacity needs, and provide lower cost world-class operating support
systems. Also, we are currently able to circumvent many of the international
tariffs or settlement rates associated with some international calls over
circuit-switched voice networks, producing additional cost savings.
INTERNATIONAL HIGH-CAPACITY NETWORK. The iBasis Network is a growing
international network that allows us to complete calls worldwide. During our
fourth quarter ended December 31, 2000, we transported approximately
228 million minutes of traffic over the more than 11,500 lines we had deployed
internationally at December 31, 2000.
FLEXIBLE BACK OFFICE SOLUTION THAT FACILITATES NEW SERVICES AND EFFECTIVE
BUSINESS MANAGEMENT. We provide communications service providers with an
integrated network, making possible advanced reporting and monitoring that
customers can access from an easy-to-use Web-based application. The flexibility
of our back office systems allows us to provide timely statistics and integrated
billing that enables a communications service provider to manage its costs more
effectively and offer new services more readily.
EASE OF DEPLOYMENT AND TIME TO MARKET. We enable carriers to route calls over
our network in a timely and cost effective manner. Most carriers and other
communications service providers need no special equipment or technical
expertise in order to access our services as connections are made in the same
manner as traditional voice-based services. Our solution shortens communications
service providers' time-to-market by enabling them to complete calls to any
country on our network without experiencing the delays typically incurred in
establishing separate contracts with local service providers in each country.
6
OPEN, SCALEABLE ARCHITECTURE DESIGNED FOR NEW SERVICES. Our network
architecture is open, scaleable and standards-based. This allows for fast
deployment of services to new countries and enables us to offer other enhanced
services over our network quickly and easily. We currently offer voice, fax,
billing and VoCore unified messaging services and intend to offer other new,
enhanced voice services as part of our Global Spoken Web offering and pending
PriceInteractive acquisition.
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES WITH VOCORE. Our VoCore offering is our hosted unified
messaging solution that provides customers with a way of creating new revenue
sources from fully unified mailboxes accessible by phone, browser or standard
email, for sending and receiving voicemail, email and facsimiles. VoCore's
carrier-class messaging offerings leverage OpenWave's unified messaging
platforms, including email and directory services, EMC's robust enterprise
storage systems, and carrier-grade application servers from Sun Microsystems and
Hewlett Packard. Because our unified communications solution supports open IP
standards, it allows the development of new add-on services that enhance the
offering as they become available.
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES WITH GLOBAL SPOKEN WEB. The goal of our Global Spoke Web
business unit is to leverage four major trends that we have identified: (1) the
growing quantity of information, including both text and multimedia content,
that can be reached via the Internet and intranets, (2) the increase in the
number of enterprises that are leveraging automated call centers to lower costs
and increase customer satisfaction, (3) the increasing demand for mobile access
to data via cellular telephones and other wireless devices, and (4) the
continued growth in the number of telephones being installed world-wide. Using
the iBasis Network as its core, the Global Spoken Web initiative is trying to
build a community of interconnected speech-enabled Web sites that can be reached
by telephones and IP devices using the iBasis Network. Enhanced services,
content delivery and a billing infrastructure are part of this vision.
THE IBASIS NETWORK
The iBasis Network is our international network, over which we deliver large
volumes of high quality international voice, fax and other enhanced services at
significant cost savings to our customers. During our fourth quarter ended
December 31, 2000, we transported approximately 228 million minutes of traffic
over our network. The iBasis Network consists of four principal elements:
- "Internet central offices" and "Internet branch offices" that translate
voice to data for transmission and reception over a data network;
- the transmission medium, which is principally the Internet;
- Assured Quality Routing, our proprietary software; and
- our global network operations center, from which we oversee and coordinate
the operation of the gateways and the transmission network.
INTERNET CENTRAL OFFICES AND INTERNET BRANCH OFFICES. Our customers can
interconnect with the iBasis Network by connecting dedicated voice circuits from
their facilities to one of our strategically located Internet central offices,
located in: Amsterdam; Cambridge, Massachusetts; Frankfurt; Hong Kong; London;
Los Angeles; Miami; New York; Paris; Singapore; Stockholm; Sydney; Tokyo; and
Toronto. Alternatively, our customers may elect to install an iBasis Internet
branch office directly at their facilities to eliminate the cost of carrying
traffic from their facilities to one of our Internet central offices. Internet
branch offices are scaleable and flexible platforms built primarily using Cisco
Systems' equipment and optimized for interconnection with the iBasis Network.
Internet branch offices receive calls through a local carrier's switched
network. Gateways in each Internet branch office digitize, compress and
packetize voice and fax calls and then transmit them over the Internet. At the
destination, another Internet branch office reverses the process and the call is
switched back from the
7
Internet to a local carrier's circuit-switched network in the destination
country. The scalability of the Internet branch offices permits us quickly to
increase capacity in discrete increments at relatively low cost, either for a
region or a customer. In addition, the Internet branch office flexible
architecture is designed to easily integrate and support the new services we
intend to offer. Our IBOExpress product is a solution that expedites deployment
of the Internet branch office. The iBasis Network currently has Internet central
offices or Internet branch offices in more than 45 countries.
THE INTERNET. Because of its global coverage, rapid growth and flexible
connectivity, we use the Internet to transmit the substantial majority of our
voice and fax traffic and deliver other enhanced voice services. By using the
Internet, we avoid having to build a private, dedicated network of fiber and
cable connections, which would delay our time-to-market in many locations and
would be more costly to deploy. We have addressed the challenges of using the
Internet by:
- selecting only high quality, service-oriented Internet service providers
as our vendors;
- purchasing high-speed connections into the Internet backbone; and
- continuously monitoring the quality of the connections between each
Internet branch office and the Internet.
We also use data transmission over private leased lines or traditional
circuit-based voice networks where the Internet is not available or would not
permit us to meet our quality standards.
ASSURED QUALITY ROUTING. We have deployed a proprietary software application,
Assured Quality Routing, to maintain high quality voice and fax service. This
application monitors the quality of calls placed over our network by applying
defined quality parameters to each processed call. These quality parameters
include measures of voice and fax quality that are important to carriers
including overall voice quality, call completion rates and post-dial delay. The
system alerts us whenever the transmission quality drops below specific
thresholds enabling us to temporarily route subsequent calls to a circuit-
switched network or an alternate Internet-based network to restore high quality.
GLOBAL NETWORK OPERATIONS CENTERS. We manage our network of Internet central
offices and Internet branch offices around the world and implement our
proprietary Assured Quality Routing software through our global network
operations center which is located in Burlington, Massachusetts. Our global
network operations center are comprised of leading network management tools from
Hewlett-Packard and a number of other vendors that permit us to monitor, test
and diagnose all components of the iBasis Network. As part of monitoring the
iBasis Network, the global network operations center also monitors the hardware
and software used in our VoCore unified communications offering. The global
network operations centers are staffed and running 7 days a week, 24 hours a
day, complete with:
- real-time, end-to-end monitoring and analysis of call behavior patterns on
the iBasis Network to identify and address potential problems before they
become serious and to anticipate issues related to network growth;
- system redundancy, including power back-up and multiple network paths; and
- a help desk, which allows us to respond to our customers problems on a
timely basis.
OUR SERVICES
Our current services include international voice and fax call completion, and
VoCore, our hosted unified communication solution. We also provide customers
with access to our Web-based traffic analysis and reporting service called
Interactive Traffic Analysis Center, or iTrac. Customers have the option to
purchase these services as a complete suite or separately.
8
INTERNATIONAL VOICE AND FAX SERVICES. We offer international voice and fax call
completion services and other enhanced services that provide our customers a
high quality, low-cost alternative for international voice and fax transport of
phone-to-phone or fax-to-fax calls placed by their business and residential
customers. Our proprietary Assured Quality Routing software and Web-based
extranet are important components of our services and are integrated elements of
our advanced operational support systems.
We offer service level agreements to our international customers. These service
level agreements for international termination services guarantee customers
sending calls over our network call completion rates equivalent to or better
than those provided by alternative networks, including the public-switched
telephone network. The call completion rate, known in the telecommunications
industry as the answer seizure ratio, represents the percentage of calls out of
all attempts that are successfully completed. The higher the answer seizure
ratio, the more reliable the network and the more billable calls that result for
a carrier.
INTERACTIVE TRAFFIC REVENUE ANALYSIS CENTER. iTrac is proprietary Web-based
traffic reporting analysis software that enables our customers to better manage
their operations through real-time information exchange. iTrac provides
statistics on service quality and traffic volume, helping customers to quickly
address service issues and more effectively plan traffic routing and network
capacity. This traffic information are delivered in a cost-efficient manner
using sophisticated and secure extranet technologies that our customers access
using a standard Web browser.
UNIFIED MESSAGING. We have deployed our VoCore hosted unified messaging
solution infrastructure on the iBasis Network. This enhanced service offering
will permit our customers to offer a communications solution that unifies the
storage of and access to email and voicemail messages as well as faxes. With the
proliferation of messaging worldwide and as people send more email, voicemail
and faxes, unified messaging services will allow subscribers to access these
different message types from the commonly-used communication devices, such as
telephones and personal computers.
FUTURE SERVICES. We intend to add new services that leverage components of the
iBasis Network to generate additional sources of revenue. We believe that our
ability to deploy new Internet-based communication services makes us an
attractive partner for application developers. We also believe that the ability
to offer these new services will be beneficial to our customers, regardless of
whether they directly charge their end-users for these services, because they
will help our customers attract new subscribers and retain an "up-sell" to their
existing subscriber base. Some of the services that we may choose to introduce
in the future include:
- GLOBAL SPOKEN WEB. We plan to provide the global communications
infrastructure for voice sites and voice portals. Corporations that
currently have voice sites may be able to take advantage of the iBasis
Network to make these voice sites accessible as local calls from wireline
and wireless phones around the world. For example, a business executive
traveling in Japan may wish to call her U.S.-based airline's reservation
system to make a flight change. Rather than having the airline charged for
an expensive international long distance call, the traveler may be able to
access the voice site by placing a less costly local call into a Tokyo
point of presence on The iBasis Network, over which we can transport the
call internationally to the airline reservation system. Beyond this, we
plan to leverage the Internet infastructure to enable the interconnection
of these voice sites and portals.
- BASIC MESSAGING SERVICES. We may offer additional basic messaging
services, including outsourced voicemail, store-and-forward fax, or
faxmail, and email.
- OTHER ADVANCED MESSAGING SERVICES. We may offer other advanced messaging
services including: single-number reach, which allows subscribers to
consolidate existing office, home, and mobile numbers into a single
contact or "follow-me" number; Internet call management services such as
caller ID, call waiting and call forwarding; and message delivery that
includes the recording and
9
scheduling of a message, repeated delivery attempts and message delivery
confirmation. These services may in some cases leverage components of our
network to provide international call-termination services and operational
support services.
- INFORMATION SERVICES. We may offer Internet-based information services
that deliver detailed, metered billing information that can help customers
to understand better how their network is being used.
- DIRECTORY SERVICES. We may offer subscriber-based directory services that
maintain important customer information. This would enable communications
service providers to customize and automate their services.
- INTERNET AND CIRCUIT-SWITCHED INFRASTRUCTURE. We may offer
circuit-switched access, dedicated Internet access, and equipment
co-location services to help our customers meet their time-to-market
objectives.
- CONFERENCING SERVICES. We may offer audio, video and data conferencing
services.
- BILLING SERVICES. We may offer outsourced billing services such as on-line
bill presentment and Internet telephony clearinghouse settlement services.
MARKETS AND CUSTOMERS
Telephone companies can be segregated by size into first tier, second tier and
third tier carriers. Generally, first tier carriers are large domestic and
international carriers, such as MCI WorldCom, Cable & Wireless, and certain
government-affiliated dominant carriers, such as the Japanese telecommunications
carrier KDD. First tier carriers generally have annual revenues in excess of
$2 billion. Second tier carriers have revenues generally in the $750 million to
$2 billion range, but have fewer direct operating agreements with other carriers
and fewer international facilities. Third tier carriers are typically
switch-based resellers with revenues of less than $750 million.
The majority of traffic over The iBasis Network is from Tier One and Two
carriers in the United States, who transmit voice and fax traffic through our
New York or Los Angeles Internet central offices for completion overseas. As of
December 31, 2000, we were providing services to eleven of the top twelve of the
highest-volume United States-based international carriers. The ability to
provide quality call completion consistently acceptable to the Tier One carriers
is of vital importance because these carriers have tremendous volumes of
commercial and retail traffic that regularly overflow their capacity. Going
forward, Tier One carriers will be a main area of focus for our sales force.
Overseas, we have established relationships with in-country companies and local
service providers that have local market expertise and relationships to build
strong businesses. Some of our overseas partners/ customers are very large,
well-established national carriers. Others are emerging carriers or Internet
service providers who are able to provide the services necessary to terminate
minutes for us in their country. During 2000, we also experienced significant
increase in the volume of traffic originated from overseas carriers, which
represents a substantial growth opportunity for iBasis. As of December 31, 2000,
iBasis provided traffic exchange services for more than 100 carriers worldwide.
Our unified messaging services are directed at service providers such as
competitive local exchange carriers, wireless, cable, application service
providers and Internet service providers. As of December 31, 2000, we had not
generated any revenue from the provision of unified messaging services.
SALES AND MARKETING
SALES STRATEGY. Our sales efforts for Internet telephony and unified messaging
target leading telecommunications carriers both in the United States and
overseas. Our sales force, comprised of
10
experienced personnel with well-established relationships in the
telecommunications industry, is frequently supplemented by senior members of
management. In the United States, we sell directly to carriers and have
successfully developed brand-awareness and beneficial relationships through
numerous channels including the Web, trade shows, speaking engagements and joint
marketing programs. The ability to provide quality acceptable to leading
carriers is a prerequisite for selling to them and others. Major carriers have
traffic that frequently exceeds their capacity and compels them to seek
alternative channels that offer comparable quality, particularly where those
channels can offer better pricing. Our sales process often involves a test by
our potential customers of our services in which they route traffic over our
network to a particular country. Our experience to date has been that once a
carrier has begun to use our network for a single country and has found our
quality to be acceptable, the sales process for other countries becomes easier.
In overseas markets, we seek to establish relationships with local service
providers that have the local market expertise to provide the termination
services we need. We believe that our ability to terminate a substantial number
of minutes through these local service providers makes us an attractive partner.
We also offer licensed international carriers in overseas markets the
opportunity to benefit from the favorable economics of Internet telephony by
sending their international long distance traffic to the iBasis Network for
transport and termination in other countries. This represents a significant
opportunity for revenue growth distinct from the growth in traffic from
U.S.-based carriers.
We have established sales offices providing sales coverage in Latin America and
the Caribbean, Europe, the Middle East and Africa, and in the Asia/Pacific
regions and in North America.
MARKETING STRATEGY. Our marketing strategy includes aggressive public relations
campaigns, outreach to and interaction with industry analysts, participation in
industry trade shows and conferences, and a comprehensive Website at
WWW.IBASIS.NET. We have engaged public relations firms on a regional basis to
conduct campaigns that support our positioning as the preeminent provider of
advanced Internet-based communications services. We aggressively pursue
favorable coverage in the trade and business press and participate in and place
executive speakers at a variety of industry trade shows and conferences,
including Voice on the Net, the International Telecommunications Union events,
The Telephone Voice User Interface Conference, and other focused sales,
marketing and industry events. We believe our Website will continue to be an
effective marketing tool in international markets.
STRATEGIC TECHNOLOGY RELATIONSHIPS
We have entered into strategic technology relationships with a number of leading
technology providers in the Internet telephony industry, including Cisco Systems
and Digiquant, formerly known as Belle Systems. We believe that our strategic
technology relationships are important because they give us early access to new
technologies and because many of our strategic relationship partners are an
important part of our sales and marketing programs.
CISCO SYSTEMS
As a Cisco Alliance Partner, we have access to Cisco's sales, marketing and
technical resources to aid our global expansion. We understand that Cisco has
selected fewer than 30 companies to participate in this program. The Cisco sales
and marketing resources available to us under this program include matching
funds for selected marketing activities, joint-sales calls, event sponsorship
and seminar support. In addition, as a Cisco Alliance Partner, we have access to
Cisco technical resources and early opportunities to bring new products and
features to the marketplace. Currently, we are engaged in three beta programs
with Cisco for new products and features. We also conduct joint sales and
marketing programs with Cisco, participate with Cisco in industry trade shows
and periodically meet with consultants at Cisco's executive briefing center.
Under the terms of our alliance agreement with Cisco, we have committed to
appoint Cisco as our preferred vendor.
11
In addition, the iBasis Network has been designated by Cisco as a certified
Cisco Powered Network-TM-. This designation permits us to leverage Cisco's
significant worldwide brand equity by displaying the Cisco Powered Network-TM-
trademark in our literature and exhibits.
DIGIQUANT SYSTEMS (FORMERLY BELLE SYSTEMS)
We also have a strategic alliance with Digiquant A/S, formerly Belle Systems, a
leading provider of billing systems for Cisco-based IP Networks. Digiquant
billing solutions are based on an architecture that provides the scalability and
flexibility that is critical to our continued success in deploying IP-messaging
services.
Under the agreement, we license computer software from Digiquant that allows us
to integrate their billing system into our network; in exchange we pay product
and license fees, which for specified products are not to exceed the lowest
price offered by Digiquant to any of its customers for the same or similar
products. Digiquant will provide general service and support for the system, and
use its best efforts to provide any additional assistance for a reasonable
price, also not to exceed the lowest prices charged by Digiquant to other
customers. The agreement also contains a limited warranty for the system, a
mutual non-disclosure obligation, and a source code escrow at our expense.
COMPETITION
As described in "Risk Factors", the market for international voice and fax call
completion services is highly competitive. We face competition from a variety of
sources including large communications service providers with more resources,
longer operating histories and more established positions in the
telecommunications marketplace, some of whom have begun to develop Internet
telephony capabilities. We also compete with small companies who have focused
primarily on Internet telephony or unified communications. We believe that we
compete principally on quality of service, price and bandwidth. We also expect
that the ability to offer enhanced service capabilities, including new services,
will become an increasingly important competitive factor in the near future.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES AND LONG DISTANCE PROVIDERS.
Large carriers around the world carry a substantial majority of
telecommunications traffic. Many of these carriers, such as British Telecom and
Deutsche Telecom, have started or begun to deploy packet-switched networks for
voice and fax traffic. These carriers retain substantial resources and have
large budgets available for research and development. In addition, several
companies, many with significant resources, such as Level 3 and Qwest
Communications, are building fiber optic networks, primarily in the United
States, for Internet telephony traffic. These networks can be expected to carry
voice and fax and these newer companies may expand into international markets.
The nature of the telecommunications marketplace is such that carriers regularly
buy from and sell to each other. Major carriers have multiple routes to
virtually every destination, and frequently buy and sell based on the strength
and capacity to a particular country. We have relationships with many of these
carriers and have carried traffic for them in the past. We expect to continue to
exchange traffic with many of these companies in the future, even as they begin
to devote more resources to competing in the Internet telephony market.
INTERNET TELEPHONY SERVICE PROVIDERS
A number of companies have started Internet telephony operations in last few
years. Concert Clearinghouse, and ITXC sell international voice and fax over the
Internet and compete directly with us. Other Internet telephony companies,
including Net2Phone, are currently focusing primarily on the retail market and
personal computer-based Internet telephony, but may compete more directly with
us in the future.
12
UNIFIED MESSAGING PROVIDERS
Numerous companies offer a complete unified messaging solution or a specific
subset of unified communication functionality. Some companies only offer a
retail unified messaging solution which, in some cases, provide limited services
for no charge. We have now teamed with OpenWave, which offers such services.
Other companies may provide a full complement of VoCore-type services to compete
with our offering in the future.
SPEECH-ENABLED ON-LINE SERVICES PROVIDERS
Several companies are offering various speech recognition and telephone
Web-access applications. Although some of these companies have established
customers and revenues, in many cases, these companies cannot provide the global
reach that the iBasis Network offers.
PriceInteractive's primary competitors are traditional interactive voice
response companies that are attempting to enter the speech recognition arena,
new speech application service provider, or ASP, entrants and
business-to-consumer portals attempting to provide speech-enabled application
service provider services.
In addition to the direct competitors described above, PriceInteractive faces
potential competition from--as well as partnering opportunities with--several
other types of businesses that may enter or border on the speech ASP space.
These include (1) mainstream application service providers that may forward
integrate into the communications or Speech ASP space and (2) other specialized
ASPs, such as Internet telephony ASPs, like iBasis, or application roll-up ASPs,
that may enter the speech market. Internet data center companies as well as
hosting companies could either forward-integrate by incorporating Speech ASP
offerings similar to PriceInteractive's or form strategic alliances with
competitive entities.
Recently, large communications carriers have increasingly emphasized
value-added, enhanced services, such as complex hosting. In addition, integrated
communications providers may increasingly focus on hosting to more tightly bind
themselves to customers and to create higher profit margins.
Finally, there are a number of startup companies offering voice portals. These
companies do not compete with PriceInteractive directly, but rather with some of
its customers, as they provide a focused and integrated speech, content and
E-commerce service. AudioPoint, a Washington, D.C. based voice portal to popular
Web functions, is now offering such services. This development-stage company is
approximately 10% owned by PriceInteractive.
PriceInteractive believes that customers focus on the following elements when
selecting a Speech ASP: references, integration capabilities, and a vendor with
the staying power to be a long-term strategic partner. We believe the combined
companies will be positioned to respond favorably to these criteria and that the
combined company's client base, expertise in developing hundreds of
applications, and high capacity platform are key competitive differentiators.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
DOMESTIC REGULATION OF THE INTERNET AND INTERNET TELEPHONY. We believe that
under United States law, the Internet-related services that we provide
constitute information services, rather than telecommunications services. As
such, our services are not currently regulated by the Federal Communications
Commission or state agencies responsible for regulating telecommunications
carriers, although aspects of our operations not wholly related to the Internet
may be subject to state or federal regulation such as regulations governing
licensing, universal service funding, confidentiality of communications,
copyright and excise taxes. However, several efforts have been made to enact
federal legislation that would either regulate or exempt from regulation
services provided over the Internet. Therefore, we cannot assure you that one or
more of the services we provide will not be regulated in
13
the future. Increased regulation of the Internet may slow its growth by
negatively impacting the cost of doing business over the Internet. This would
materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We also cannot assure investors that Internet telephony will continue to be
lightly regulated by the FCC and state regulatory agencies. Although the FCC has
determined that, at present, information service providers, including Internet
telephony providers, are not telecommunications carriers, we cannot be certain
that this position will continue. If the FCC determines that Internet telephony
is subject to regulation as a telecommunications service, it may subject
providers of Internet telephony services to traditional common carrier
regulation and/or require them to make universal service contributions and pay
access charges where they do not already through terminating providers. It is
also possible that the FCC will adopt a regulatory framework for Internet
telephony providers different than that applied to traditional common carriers.
Finally, Congressional dissatisfaction with the FCC's conclusions regarding
Internet telephony could result in legislation requiring the FCC to impose
greater or lesser regulation. Any change in the existing regulation of Internet
telephony by the FCC or Congress could materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
In addition to the FCC and Congress, the Office of Foreign Asset Control of the
U.S. Department of the Treasury, or OFAC, administers the United States'
sanctions against certain countries. OFAC rules restrict many business
transactions with such countries and, in some cases, require that licenses be
obtained for such transactions. We may currently, or in the future, transmit
telecommunications between the U.S. and countries subject to U.S. sanctions
regulations and undertake other transactions related to those services. We have
undertaken such activities in reliance on our good faith interpretation of the
sanctions regulations. We cannot assure you that OFAC will agree with our
interpretation or position. We have contacted OFAC about certain such
transactions, and are in the process of seeking approval, if necessary, for any
such transactions.
State regulatory authorities and legislators may also assert jurisdiction over
the provision of intrastate Internet telephony services. While we do not
currently provide intrastate services and have no current plans to do so,
additional regulation of Internet telephony by the states could preclude us from
entering the intrastate market, or make entrance more difficult or costly.
In addition to Internet telephony, we provide other services over the Internet
infrastructure such as VoCore unified communications and calling card services.
We believe that our VoCore unified communications services are not subject to
federal or state regulation. Indeed, certain features of the VoCore unified
communications service, such as the voicemail, electronic mail, and facsimile
services, have been expressly found by the FCC to be an enhanced service not
subject to regulation. In addition, we secure telephony functions from other
providers, such as numbering resources for local or toll-free access to
voicemail. We provide this service, in part, by collocating equipment connected
to the public Internet with competitive local exchange providers around the
country. Because we purchase these services as an end-user, we do not believe
that we are subject to any associated regulation. However, some of the other
VoCore unified communications features, which are integrated as part of a
package of features, are less easily classified as unregulated services. These
features could include outbound calling which, if standing alone and not carried
over the Internet, could be regulated as a traditional telephony service. Such
regulations could impose on us or our wholesale customers requirements such as
licensing, universal service contributions and other subsidies and surcharges,
and the requirement to file tariffs containing terms and conditions of service.
Our prepaid international calling card services are offered to international
carrier customers, some of which provide these services to end-user customers,
enabling them to call to their home countries over the iBasis network when
traveling in the U.S. Although the calling cards are not marketed or intended
for domestic interstate or intrastate use, we have not blocked the ability to
place such calls or required
14
our wholesale customers to show evidence of their compliance with United States
and state regulations. As a result, there may be incidental domestic use of the
cards. Domestic calling may employ transport and switching that is not connected
to the Internet and, therefore, may not enjoy the lighter regulation to which
our Internet-based services are subject. Because we are a wholesale carrier, we
do not believe that we are subject to federal or state regulation for the
possible uses of these services described here and, accordingly, we have not
obtained state licenses, or filed state or federal tariffs, or undertaken other
possible compliance steps. There can be no assurance that the FCC and state
regulatory authorities will agree with our position. If they do not, we could
become subject to regulation at the federal and state level for these services,
and could become subject to licensing and bonding requirements, and federal and
state fees and taxes, including universal service contributions and other
subsidies.
The FCC also requires that all calling card service providers that enable users
to place toll-free calls from payphones in the United States to compensate the
payphone operator for each call placed from a payphone. Future change in FCC
payphone compensation rules and/or the failure of a company that provides
toll-free numbers to us to compensate payphone companies could affect our
revenues.
Finally, Congress continues to consider and adopt legislation that regulates
certain aspects of the Internet, including online content, user privacy, and
taxation. In addition, Congress and other federal entities have considered other
proposals that would further regulate use of the Internet. These proposals
address a wide range of issues including Internet "spamming," database privacy,
gambling, pornography and child protection, Internet fraud, privacy, and digital
signatures. Similarly, various states have adopted or are considering
Internet-related legislation. Increased regulation of the Internet may slow its
growth, which may negatively impact the cost of doing business over the Internet
and materially adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
INTERNATIONAL GOVERNMENT REGULATION OF THE INTERNET AND INTERNET TELEPHONY. We
provide our Internet telephony services in various countries in Europe, Asia,
Latin America, Africa and the Middle East. The regulatory treatment of Internet
telephony and other iBasis services in these countries varies widely and is
subject to constant change. Until recently, most countries either did not have
regulations addressing Internet telephony or other VoIP services such as unified
messaging and calling cards, classifying these services as unregulated enhanced
services. As the Internet telephony market has grown and matured, increasing
numbers of regulators have begun to reconsider whether to regulate Internet
telephony and other VoIP services. Some countries currently impose little or no
regulation on Internet telephony or VoIP services, as in the United States.
Conversely, other countries that prohibit or limit competition for traditional
voice telephony services generally do not permit Internet telephony or VoIP
services or strictly limit the terms under which it may be provided. Still other
countries regulate Internet telephony and VoIP services like traditional voice
telephony services, requiring Internet telephony companies to make universal
service contributions and pay other taxes, countries may also determine on a
case-by-case basis whether to regulate Internet telephony and VoIP services as
voice services, as enhanced services or as another service. The varying and
constantly changing regulation of Internet telephony and VoIP in the countries
in which we currently provide or may provide services may materially adversely
affect our business financial condition and results of operations.
The European Union, for example, distinguishes between voice telephony, which
may be regulated by the member states, and other enhanced services, which are
fully liberalized. With regard to Internet telephony, the European Commission
has made pronouncements that at present, Internet telephony should not be
considered voice telephony and should not be regulated as such by their members.
However, the Commission noted that providers of Internet telephony whose
services satisfied the European Union's definition of voice telephony could be
considered providers of voice telephony and could be regulated by the member
states. Moreover, Commission pronouncements are not binding on the member
states. Therefore, there can be no assurance that the services provided by us in
the
15
European Union will not be deemed voice telephony and, accordingly, subject to
heightened regulation by one or more European Union countries in the future.
We also provide our services in countries where the regulation of Internet
telephony is more restrictive than in the United States and the European Union.
Despite this, we have found service partners in various countries who can
establish an Internet branch office, and in some countries where we have planned
to deploy an Internet central office, we have been able to obtain regulatory
approval to provide the full range of iBasis services. Changes in the regulatory
regimes of countries where we do businesses currently, that may have the effect
of limiting or prohibiting Internet telephony or other iBasis services, or that
impose new or additional regulatory, universal service, tax or financial
requirements on providers of such services, could result in our being unable to
provide services to one or more countries in which we currently operate.
In addition, as we expand into additional foreign countries, such countries may
assert that we are required to qualify to do business in the particular foreign
country, that we are otherwise subject to regulation, or that we are prohibited
from conducting our business in that country. Our failure to qualify as a
foreign corporation in a jurisdiction in which we are required to do so, or to
comply with foreign laws and regulations, would materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations, including by subjecting
us to taxes and penalties and/or by precluding us from, or limiting us in,
enforcing contracts in such jurisdictions. Likewise, our customers and partners
may be or become subject to requirements to qualify to do business in a
particular foreign country, otherwise to comply with regulations, or to cease
from conducting business in that country. We cannot be certain that our
customers and partners are currently in compliance with regulatory or other
legal requirements in their respective countries, that they will be able to
comply with existing or future requirements, and/or that they will continue in
compliance with any requirements. The failure of our customers and partners to
comply with these requirements could materially adversely affect our business,
financial conditions and results of operations.
Other international regulations may affect our business. For example, the
European Union imposes restrictions on the collection and use of personal data
and grants European Union citizens broad rights to access and limit the use of
their personal data. United States companies that collect or transmit
information over the Internet from individuals in European Union Member States
are subject to European Union legislation, which imposes restrictions that are
more stringent than existing Internet privacy standards in the United States.
The potential effect on us of development in this area is uncertain; however, a
prohibition on the export of personal data by us could have a material adverse
impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Finally, the International Telecomunications Union, or the ITU, an international
treaty organization that deals with telecommunications matters, has not taken
any action in favor or against Internet telephony. In 2000, however, the ITU
convened meetings and published reports on the Internet and Internet telephony
issues, partly in response to concerns from some developing countries over
Internet Telephony and tariffing of international Internet backbone traffic. The
ITU will hold additional meetings and will issue additional reports on Internet
telephony during 2001 that may encourage some countries to increase or reduce
their regulation of Internet telephony. In particular, an ITU study group is
examining how international Internet backbone providers compensate each other
for traffic. These efforts, which may take several years to be completed and
which are currently opposed by the United States and some European countries,
may eventually result in changes in national or international regulations
dealing with financial compensation for international Internet traffic which
could affect certain of our costs.
16
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
We regard our copyrights, service marks, trademarks, trade dress, trade secrets
and similar intellectual property as critical to our success and we rely on
trademark and copyright law, trade secret protection and confidentiality and/or
license agreements with our employees, customers, partners and others to protect
our proprietary rights. In addition, following the acquisition of
PriceInteractive, we will own rights to certain patents, patent applications and
other intellectual property. We intend to rely on patent law and confidentiality
and/or license agreements with our employees, customers, partners and others to
protect our proprietary rights in such patents and patent applications. We
pursue the registration of our trademarks and service marks in the United States
and have applied for the registration of certain of our trademarks and service
marks. We have been granted trademark registration for the mark Assured Quality
Routing in the United States, and have pending registration applications for the
service marks iBasis, VoCore, IBOxpress and 800xtend. In addition, following the
acquisition of PriceInteractive, we will own rights to a number of registered
trademarks and pending trademark registration applications as well as rights to
certain patents, patent applications and other intellectual protection.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2000, we had 335 full-time employees, with approximately 117
in sales and marketing, 142 in engineering and operations and 76 in general and
administrative. As of December 31, 2000, we engaged approximately 80 independent
contractors and we employ a limited number of temporary employees. Our employees
are not represented by a labor union and we consider our labor relations to be
good.
As of December 31, 2000, PriceInteractive had 138 full-time employees, with
approximately 18 in sales and marketing, 37 in engineering and operations, 68 in
professional services, and 19 in general and administrative. As of December 31,
2000, PriceInteractive engaged approximately 6 independent contractors and
employed a limited number of temporary employees. PriceInteractive's employees
are not represented by a labor union.
17
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We currently lease the following facilities:
ADDRESS SQUARE FOOTAGE EXPIRATION OF LEASE FACILITY USE
- ------- -------------- ------------------- ------------------------
20 Second Avenue Burlington, MA..... 27,235 March 2005 headquarters, executive
office space, including
sales and marketing,
engineering and a global
network operations
center
10 Second Avenue Burlington, MA..... 23,269 March 2005 research and
development, operations
and finance and
administration
31 Third Avenue Burlington, MA...... 9,230 May 2003 executive office space,
including operations and
administration
Los Angeles, CA..................... 3,156 April 2009 house telecommunications
equipment
New York, NY........................ 4,372 July 2008 house telecommunications
equipment
New York, NY........................ 7,280 October 2010 house telecommunications
equipment
Miami, FL........................... 10,500 February 2010 house telecommunications
equipment
Cambridge, MA....................... 9,440 March 2003 house telecommunications
equipment
Hong Kong, CHINA.................... 6,000 October 31, 2003 executive office space
and to house a global
network operations
center
We have obtained collocation space in special facilities around the world that
are dedicated to housing equipment of multiple competitive telephony carriers.
We lease these smaller spaces to house Internet routing and related equipment in
Amsterdam, Chicago, Frankfurt, Honolulu, Hong Kong, Lima, London, Madrid, Paris,
Philadelphia, San Francisco, Seattle, Singapore, Stockholm, Sydney, Tokyo,
Toronto and temporary office space in London.
PriceInteractive leases 42,000 square feet in Reston, Virginia, twenty miles
from Washington, D.C. and ten miles from Dulles International airport, where its
primary business offices and the main service platform are located. In addition,
PriceInteractive leases space in St. Louis, Missouri, providing platform back-up
to its Reston facility. In the third quarter of 2000, PriceInteractive occupied
an Equinix outsource data center facility located in nearby Ashburn, Virginia,
to host the planned expansion of the SpeechPort platform.
We believe that our existing facilities are adequate for our current needs and
that suitable additional or alternative space will be available in the future on
commercially reasonable terms.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
18
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
MARKET INFORMATION
Our common stock began trading publicly on the Nasdaq National Market on
November 10, 1999 and is traded under the symbol "IBAS." The following table
shows the range of the high and low per share prices of our common stock, as
reported by the Nasdaq National Market for the period indicated.
HIGH LOW
-------- --------
FISCAL 2000:
First Quarter........................................... $94.25 $28.00
Second Quarter.......................................... $51.63 $13.00
Third Quarter........................................... $42.63 $14.13
Fourth Quarter.......................................... $15.88 $ 4.00
On February 20, 2001, the closing price of the common stock on the Nasdaq
National Market was $5.03 per share, the high and low sales prices were
approximately $5.75 and $4.88.
HOLDERS
As of February 20, 2001 there were 360 stockholders of record. This does not
reflect persons or entities who hold their stock in nominee or "street" name
through various brokerage firms. Based on our solicitation of proxies in
January 2001, we estimate that there are approximately 15,000 holders of iBasis
stock.
DIVIDENDS
iBasis has never declared or paid cash dividends on its common stock. iBasis
intends to retain all future earnings to finance future growth, and, therefore,
does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
19
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following historical selected financial information of iBasis is qualified
by reference to, and should be read in conjunction with, the consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this document.
PERIOD FROM INCEPTION
(AUGUST 2, 1996)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, TO DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------- ---------------------
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
-------- -------- -------- -------- ---------------------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Net revenue.................................. $ 61,218 $ 19,417 $ 1,978 $ 127 $ --
Operating expenses:
Data communications and telecommunications... 60,594 21,007 2,730 187 --
Research and development..................... 15,168 6,183 1,674 317 76
Selling and marketing........................ 19,352 5,568 1,160 97 --
General and administrative................... 19,657 5,309 1,365 454 --
Depreciation and amortization................ 15,718 2,997 364 19 --
Loss (gain) on disposal of property and
equipment.................................. -- (15) 531 -- --
-------- -------- ------- ------ ------
Total operating expenses................... 130,489 41,049 7,824 1,074 76
-------- -------- ------- ------ ------
Loss from operations....................... (69,271) (21,632) (5,846) (947) (76)
Interest income.............................. 19,824 1,329 179 17 --
Interest expense............................. (12,844) (836) (53) (4) --
Other income (expense), net.................. -- 3 (7) 8 --
Minority interest in loss of joint venture... -- 49 -- -- --
-------- -------- ------- ------ ------
Net loss................................... (62,291) (21,087) (5,727) (926) (76)
Accretion of dividends on redeemable
convertible preferred stock................ -- (1,020) (219) -- --
-------- -------- ------- ------ ------
Net loss applicable to common
stockholders............................. $(62,291) $(22,107) $(5,946) $ (926) $ (76)
======== ======== ======= ====== ======
Pro forma net loss applicable to common
stockholders............................... $(21,087) $(5,727)
======== =======
Basic and diluted net loss per share
applicable to common stockholders.......... $ (1.85) $ (2.29) $ (0.99) $(0.15) $(0.01)
======== ======== ======= ======
Basic and diluted weighted average common
shares outstanding (1)..................... 33,612 9,655 6,023 6,006 6,000
Pro forma basic and diluted net loss per
share (1)(2)............................... $ (0.89) $ (0.44)
======== ======= ======
Pro forma basic and diluted weighted average
common shares outstanding (1)(2)........... 23,678 13,068
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------
2000 1999
-------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities............ $300,327 $123,666
Working capital............................................. 258,513 115,154
Total assets................................................ 447,818 153,473
Long term debt, net of current portion...................... 190,880 11,689
Total stockholders' (deficit) equity........................ 206,896 126,904
- --------------------------
(1) Computed on the basis described in Note 1(d) of the notes to our
consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this annual report.
(2) Adjusted to give effect to the conversion of all shares of preferred stock,
Class A and Class B common stock from the date of original issuance. Does
not include the shares of common stock issued upon the conversion of notes
issued by the Company in March 2000.
20
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATION
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
THIS ANNUAL REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE
PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995. THIS ACT PROVIDES A "SAFE
HARBOR" FOR FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS TO ENCOURAGE COMPANIES TO PROVIDE
PROSPECTIVE INFORMATION ABOUT THEMSELVES SO LONG AS THEY IDENTIFY THESE
STATEMENTS AS FORWARD LOOKING AND PROVIDE MEANINGFUL CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS
IDENTIFYING IMPORTANT FACTORS THAT COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER FROM THE
PROJECTED RESULTS. ALL STATEMENTS OTHER THAN STATEMENTS OF HISTORICAL FACT MADE
IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT ARE FORWARD LOOKING. IN PARTICULAR, THE STATEMENTS HEREIN
REGARDING INDUSTRY PROSPECTS AND FUTURE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OR FINANCIAL
POSITION ARE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS REFLECT
MANAGEMENT'S CURRENT EXPECTATIONS AND ARE INHERENTLY UNCERTAIN. IBASIS'S ACTUAL
RESULTS MAY DIFFER SIGNIFICANTLY FROM MANAGEMENT'S EXPECTATIONS. WE DISCLAIM ANY
DUTY TO UPDATE ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, ALL OF WHICH SHOULD BE READ IN
CONJUNCTION WITH THE "RISK FACTORS" SECTION OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT.
OVERVIEW
We are a provider of international voice and fax call completion services, and
other value-added services using the Internet. We were incorporated in
August 1996 and commenced commercial operations in May 1997. We first recorded
revenue from the sale of equipment in May 1997, and first recorded revenue from
the sale of voice and fax services over our network in January 1998. In
July 1999, we changed our name from "VIP Calling, Inc." to "iBasis, Inc." In
November 1999, we completed our initial public offering and issued 7,820,000
shares of common stock, which resulted in total net proceeds to us of
approximately $114.7 million. In March 2000, the Company completed its secondary
offering and issued 2,026,637 shares of common stock. The offering resulted in
net proceeds of $140.3 million. The Company also sold $150.0 million of
convertible subordinated notes due in 2005, for net proceeds of approximately
$144.8 million.
2000 was a year of tremendous growth for iBasis as we continued to execute
strongly in our core international voice over IP business, producing significant
growth in revenue, minutes and overseas lines.
2000 Performance Highlights:
- For the full year 2000, revenue totaled $61.22 million, more than triple
the company's full year 1999 revenue of $19.42 million.
- In the fourth quarter, as we began to benefit from economies of scale and
improving network utilization, we produced nearly $1 million in positive
gross margin, creating net positive gross margin for the full year. We
believe that the company is now in a position to achieve sustainable
positive gross margin for the foreseeable future.
- For the full year, minutes totaled 600.4 million compared to
156.5 million minutes of use in 1999, a 284% increase.
- In 2000, we also saw an increasing percentage of traffic coming to us from
the world's largest carriers, known in the industry as Tier 1 carriers. In
the fourth quarter 2000, Tier 1 traffic accounted for more than 30% of all
the voice traffic carried on The iBasis Network, compared with less than
20% at the end of 1999.
- The iBasis Network footprint significantly expanded during the fourth
quarter and the full year. The company's total overseas lines were 11,500
at the end of the fourth quarter of 2000, up from 3,220 at the end of the
1999, a 257% year-over-year increase.
21
- The total number of Points of Presence (PoP's) in the iBasis Network
increased from 91 at the end of 1999 to 426 at the end of 2000, an
increase of more than 368%.
- The company continued to increase the percentage of overseas-originated
traffic it carries, which improves network utilization and generally
produces higher margins than US-originated traffic. By the end of 2000,
overseas-originated calls accounted for 11.7% of iBasis traffic and more
than 17% of total revenue, up from 8.3% and 10% respectively, at the end
of 1999.
- The company achieved significant market share on many of its routes,
ending the year carrying traffic equivalent to between 10%-35% of all
U.S.-outbound voice and fax traffic to fourteen of the countries served by
its global network.
- The company expanded its network's geographic reach during 2000, more than
doubling the number of countries served by its global network, ending the
year with more than 45 "on-net" countries, up from 20 "on-net" countries
at the end of 1999.
- The company doubled its customer base during the year, ending the year
with more than 100 carrier customers, up from approximately 50 at the end
of 1999. Announced customers included four of China's five largest
carriers, one of which, China Mobile, is the world's largest wireless
carrier; Concert Global Clearinghouse, the AT&T/British Telecom global
joint venture; NTT-ME, part of Japan's national carrier; Telstra,
Australia's national carrier; The Communications Authority of Thailand;
Protel, the first Mexican carrier licensed to provide international VoIP
services; Israeli carrier Barak; Russian carrier Sovintel; and European
carriers Storm Telecommunications and IPirion.
- The company deployed iTrac (Interactive Traffic Analysis Center), a
Web-based service that provides customers with interactive analysis tools
and critical data about their iBasis Network activity, including the total
minutes of voice and fax traffic, total number of calls, call completion
ratios and average call duration. iTrac data is organized for analysis by
country of origin and termination. By analyzing their global VoIP traffic
with iTrac, iBasis customers can streamline their network planning
processes and optimize their utilization of the iBasis Network.
- During the fourth quarter of 2000, the company announced initiatives
intended to leverage its VoIP infrastructure to deliver global access to
speech-enabled business services. These included a joint marketing and
development effort with SpeechWorks International (Nasdaq: SPWX), a leader
in the telephony-based speech technology industry, to provide global
access to speech-enabled Internet services and content for wireline and
wireless carriers, enterprises, Voice Application Service Providers (Voice
ASPs) and voice portals.
- In December 2000, iBasis announced that it signed a definitive agreement
to acquire privately-held PriceInteractive, a leading Speech Application
Service Provider (ASP) whose products and services give enterprises and
service providers the ability to speech-enable business-critical,
customer-facing solutions, such as e-commerce, call-center, employee
self-service, product and sales information, customer care and other
interactive applications. PriceInteractive's customers include AT&T,
ExxonMobil, Gannett, H&R Block, Home Shopping Network, Morgan Stanley,
Sabre Group, WorldCom, Sprint, Verizon, and Western Union. Connecting
these services to the iBasis Network, with its global reach and reduced
network costs, will increase the value and scope of the solutions
PriceInteractive provides to its large enterprise and carrier customers.
By leveraging the iBasis Network and its global footprint with these
hosted speech-enabled services, iBasis also expects to accelerate its
revenue generation from enhanced services. The acquisition of
PriceInteractive is an important step in iBasis' strategy to enhance the
capabilities of its global VoIP infrastructure with new, speech-enabled
solutions that connect mobile and fixed phone users to Web-based
applications and services.
22
- On January 31, 2001, we announced a relationship with Openwave to become a
global ASP (Application Service Provider) partner offering enhanced
communications services to wireless carriers and other service providers.
These new iBasis VoCore services will be based on Openwave's unified
messaging offering and will provide a comprehensive package of hosted
communications services, including email, voicemail, faxmail, mobile phone
synchronization, and personal contact management.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
NET REVENUE. Our primary source of revenue is the fees that we receive from
customers for completing calls over our network. This revenue is dependent on
the volume of voice and fax traffic carried over the network, which is measured
in minutes. We charge our customers fees per minute of traffic that are
dependent on the length and destination of the call and recognize this revenue
in the period in which the call is completed. We also derive a limited amount of
revenue from the sale of equipment to our customers. Most of these equipment
sales are financed by us by offsetting termination fees otherwise payable to
local service providers against the equipment purchase price until the full
purchase price has been paid.
Our net revenue increased by $41.8 million to $61.2 million in the year ended
December 31, 2000 from $19.4 million in the year ended December 31, 1999. This
increase was primarily driven by an increase in revenue from voice and fax call
completion services to $59.4 million in 2000 from $19.0 million in 1999. The
increase in voice and fax call completion services net revenue resulted from an
increase in the amount of traffic carried over our network to 600.4 million
minutes in 2000 from 156.5 million minutes in 1999. Net revenue from the sale of
equipment increased to $1.8 million in 2000 from $435,000 in 1999.
DATA COMMUNICATIONS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS EXPENSES. Data communications and
telecommunications expenses are comprised primarily of termination fees,
purchased minutes, equipment expense and other expenses associated with data
communications and telecommunications. Termination fees are paid to local
service providers to terminate calls received from our network. This traffic is
measured in minutes, and the per minute rates charged for terminating calls are
negotiated with the local service provider and included in our contract with our
local service provider. Should competition cause a decrease in our prices and,
as a result our profit margins, our contracts with our providers provide us with
the right to renegotiate the per minute termination fees. Purchased minutes are
fees we pay to other telecommunications carriers for completing calls over the
public circuit-switched network to destinations outside of our network, and as a
back-up to our network when our proprietary Assured Quality Routing software
indicates that either these carriers are needed to maintain the quality of our
services or our capacity to a particular destination has been exceeded. The
amount of these fees depends on the volume of voice and fax traffic carried over
the public circuit-switched network, which is also measured in minutes of
traffic. Presently, less than 10% of our traffic is completed using the public
switched telephone network as a backup to the iBasis Network. The per minute
rate charge for purchased minutes is negotiated with public circuit-switched
network carriers for each destination served. The primary direct expenses that
we incur in selling our equipment are those incurred to purchase the component
parts of our equipment from a variety of vendors. The equipment expenses vary
based on the number of units contracted, assembled and sold in a particular
period, and will increase as equipment sales increase. Other data communication
and telecommunications expenses include charges for Internet access at our
Internet offices, fees for the fiber optic connections between our Internet
offices and our customers and/or suppliers, facilities charges for overseas
Internet access and phone lines to the primary telecommunications carriers in
particular countries, and charges for the limited number of dedicated
international private line circuits we use.
23
Data communications and telecommunications expenses increased by $39.6 million
to $60.6 million in 2000 from $21.0 million in 1999. The increase in data
communications and telecommunications expense was driven by the increase in
traffic described above, as termination fees increased to $34.6 million in 2000
from $8.5 million in 1999, and purchased minutes increased to $15.0 million in
2000 from $7.7 million in 1999. Equipment expenses directly related to equipment
sales increased to $1.5 million in 2000 from $431,000 in 1999. Other data
communications and telecommunications expenses, including Internet access,
public circuit-switched network access, and international private line charges,
increased to $9.5 million in 2000 from $4.4 million in 1999. As a percentage of
total revenue, data communications and telecommunications expenses decreased to
99% in 2000 from 108% in 1999. We expect data communications and
telecommunication expenses to decrease as a percentage of sales as we increase
utilization and efficiency of our network and achieve economies of scale.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES. Research and development expenses include
the expenses associated with developing, operating, supporting and expanding our
international and domestic network, expenses for improving and operating our
global network operations center, salaries, and payroll taxes and benefits paid
for employees directly involved in the development and operation of our global
network operations center and the rest of our network. Also included in this
category are research and development expenses that consist primarily of
expenses incurred in enhancing, developing, updating and supporting our network
and our proprietary software applications.
Research and development expenses increased by $9.0 million to $15.2 million in
2000 from $6.2 million in 1999. This increase in research and development
expenses is due principally to the increase in personnel within the group to 142
at the end of 2000 from 62 at the end of 1999. As a percentage of total revenue,
research and development expenses decreased to 25% in 2000 from 32% in 1999. We
expect that research and development expense will continue to decrease as a
percentage of sales.
SELLING AND MARKETING EXPENSES. Selling and marketing expenses include expenses
relating to the salaries, payroll taxes, benefits and commissions that we pay
for sales personnel and the expenses associated with the development and
implementation of our promotion and marketing campaigns, including expenses
relating to our outside public relations firm and industry analysts. Selling and
marketing expenses increased by $13.8 million to $19.4 million in 2000 from
$5.6 million in 1999. This increase is primarily attributed to an increase in
the number of personnel in the selling and marketing departments which increased
to 117 at the end of 2000 compared to 47 at the end of 1999. As a percentage of
total revenue, selling and marketing expenses increased to 32% in 2000 from 29%
in 1999. We anticipate that selling and marketing expenses will increase in the
future as we expand our domestic and international sales force, hire additional
marketing personnel and increase expenditures for selling, promotional and
marketing activities.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. General and administrative expenses
include salary, payroll tax and benefit expenses and related costs for general
corporate functions, including executive management, finance and administration,
legal and regulatory, facilities, information technology and human resources.
General and administrative expenses increased by $14.4 million to $19.7 million
in 2000 from $5.3 million in 1999. General and administrative expenses increased
primarily due to: an increase in the number of employees in these functions to
76 people at the end of 2000 from 38 people at the end of 1999, an increase in
consulting and professional fees for information technology initiatives,
increased use of outsourced billing services and growth in our allowance for
doubtful accounts. As a percentage of total revenue, general and administrative
expenses increased to 32% in 2000 from 27% in 1999. We expect general and
administrative expenses to decrease as a percentage of sales as we leverage our
current employee base through automation and other efficiency improvement
projects.
24
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION EXPENSES. Depreciation and amortization expenses
increased by $12.7 million to $15.7 million in 2000 from $3.0 million in 1999.
This increase resulted from additional purchases of capital equipment and
software that were needed to support our expanding network. As a percentage of
total revenue, depreciation and amortization expense increased to 26% in 2000
from 15% in 1999. We expect depreciation and amortization expenses to decrease
as a percentage of sales as we ramp revenues and utilization of the iBasis
network.
INTEREST INCOME AND INTEREST EXPENSE. Interest expense is primarily comprised
of interest paid on the convertible subordinated notes and various capital lease
agreements established to finance a substantial majority of the hardware and
software components of our network. Interest income is primarily composed of
income earned on our cash and cash equivalents. Interest income increased by
$18.5 million to $19.8 million in 2000 from $1.3 million in 1999. This increase
was primarily attributable to increased interest earnings on our cash and cash
equivalents and marketable securities, which increased by $177.1 million from
$123.7 million at December 31, 1999 to $300.8 million at December 31, 2000 as a
result of our secondary offering of common stock completed in March 2000 and the
sale of convertible subordinated notes also completed in March 2000. Interest
expense increased to $12.8 million in 2000 from $836,000 in 1999. This increase
was attributable to interest paid on convertible subordinated notes as well as
interest paid on capital equipment financing.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
NET REVENUE. Our net revenue increased by $17.4 million to $19.4 million in the
year ended December 31, 1999 from $2.0 million in the year ended December 31,
1998. This increase was primarily driven by an increase in revenue from voice
and fax call completion services to $19.0 million in 1999 from $1.7 million in
1998. The increase in voice and fax call completion services net revenue
resulted from an increase in the amount of traffic carried over our network to
156.5 million minutes in 1999 from 12.1 million minutes in 1998. Net revenue
from the sale of equipment increased to $435,000 in 1999 from $273,000 in 1998.
DATA COMMUNICATIONS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS EXPENSES. Data communications and
telecommunications expenses increased by $18.3 million to $21.0 million in 1999
from $2.7 million in 1998. The increase in data communications and
telecommunications expense was driven by the increase in traffic described
above, as termination fees increased to $8.5 million in 1999 from $579,000 in
1998, and purchased minutes increased to $7.7 million in 1999 from $921,000 in
1998. Equipment expenses directly related to equipment sales increased to
$437,000 in 1999 from $217,000 in 1998. Other data communications and
telecommunications expenses, including Internet access, public circuit-switched
network access, and international private line charges, increased to
$4.4 million in 1999 from $1.0 million in 1998. As a percentage of total
revenue, data communications and telecommunications expenses decreased to 108%
in 1999 from 138% in 1998.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES. Research and development expenses increased
by $4.5 million to $6.2 million in 1999 from $1.7 million in 1998. This increase
in research and development expenses is due principally to the increase in
personnel within the group to 62 at the end of 1999 from 20 at the end of 1998.
As a percentage of total revenue, research and development expenses decreased to
32% in 1999 from 85% in 1998.
SELLING AND MARKETING EXPENSES. Selling and marketing expenses increased by
$4.4 million to $5.6 million in 1999 from $1.2 million in 1998. This increase is
attributable to an increase in the number of personnel employed in selling and
marketing to 47 at the end of 1999 from eight at the end of 1998, and increased
marketing expenses, particularly in connection with a public relations campaign
we initiated in October 1998. As a percentage of total revenue, selling and
marketing expenses decreased to 29% in 1999 from 59% in 1998.
25
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. General and administrative expenses
increased by $3.9 million to $5.3 million in 1999 from $1.4 million in 1998.
General and administrative expenses increased primarily due to an increase in
the number of employees to 38 at the end of 1999 from six at the end of 1998, an
increase in consulting and professional fees, and an increase in our allowance
for doubtful accounts. As a percentage of total revenue, general and
administrative expenses decreased to 27% in 1999 from 69% in 1998.
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION EXPENSES. Depreciation and amortization expenses
increased by $2.6 million to $3.0 million in 1999 from $364,000 in 1998. This
increase primarily resulted from additional purchases of capital equipment and
software that were needed to support our expanding network. As a percentage of
total revenue, depreciation and amortization expense decreased to 15% in 1999
from 18% in 1998.
INTEREST INCOME AND INTEREST EXPENSE. Interest expense is primarily comprised
of interest paid on the various capital lease agreements established to finance
a substantial majority of the hardware and software components of our network.
Interest income is primarily composed of income earned on our cash and cash
equivalents. Interest income increased by $1.1 million to $1.3 million in 1999
from $179,000 in 1998. This increase was primarily attributable to increased
interest earnings on our cash and cash equivalents, which increased by
$116.3 million from $7.4 million as a result of our initial public offering,
which was completed in November 1999. Interest expense increased by $783,000 to
$836,000 in 1999 from $53,000 in 1998. This increase was attributable to
interest paid on capital equipment financing.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our principal capital and liquidity needs historically have related to the
development of our network infrastructure, our sales and marketing activities,
research and development expenses, and general capital needs. Our capital needs
have been met, in large part, from the net proceeds from our initial and
secondary public offerings of common stock, the sale of convertible subordinated
notes and the sale of our Class B common stock and preferred stock. As we placed
greater emphasis on expanding our network infrastructure, we have also sought to
meet our capital needs through vendor capital leases and other equipment
financings. We have also established a line of credit with a bank.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $276.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2000, $139.0 million for the year ended December 31, 1999, and
$11.6 million for the year ended December 31, 1998. These amounts are primarily
attributable to the net proceeds from our initial public offering, our secondary
public offering, the issuance of convertible notes and the issuance of Class B
common stock and preferred stock. The proceeds from the offerings were partially
offset by payments on capital lease obligations.
Net cash used in operating activities was $48.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2000, $16.7 million for the year ended December 31, 1999, and
$2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 1998. Cash used in operating
activities for all periods resulted from net losses and increases in accounts
receivable, which were partially offset by increases in accounts payable,
accrued liabilities and depreciation and amortization.
Net cash used in investing activities was $143.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2000, $6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 1999, and
$3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 1998. Cash used in investing
activities was primarily related to purchases of equipment, purchases of
marketable and non-marketable securities.
INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING. In November 1999, we completed our initial public
offering and issued 7,820,000 shares of common stock, which resulted in total
net proceeds to us of $114.7 million.
26
Upon the completion of our initial public offering, all outstanding shares of
our preferred stock and Class B common stock automatically converted into the
following number of shares of Class A common stock:
NUMBER OF SHARES OF
CLASS A COMMON STOCK
--------------------
Series A preferred stock................................. 3,750,000
Series B preferred stock................................. 6,562,500
Series C preferred stock................................. 5,744,103
Class B common stock..................................... 1,500,000
Subsequently, all outstanding shares of Class A common stock converted into
23,738,353 shares of common stock.
SECONDARY PUBLIC OFFERING. In March 2000, we completed our secondary public
offering in which we sold 2,026,637 shares of common stock, which resulted in
total net proceeds to us of $140.3 million. Concurrently, we offered
$150 million in 5 3/4% convertible subordinated notes due 2005 which resulted in
total net proceeds to us of $144.8 million. The notes are convertible at any
time prior to maturity into common stock at a conversion price of $86.14 per
share, subject to adjustment upon certain events.
EQUIPMENT LEASING AND FINANCING. We lease equipment from various vendors under
master agreements and multiple lease sub-agreements. Each of the multiple
equipment leases specifies its own term, rate and payment schedule, depending
upon the value and amount of equipment leased. As of December 31, 2000, we had
an additional $42 million available for borrowing under a $90 million master
agreement with Cisco Systems Capital Corporation.
REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT. On June 18, 1999, the Company entered into a loan and
security agreement (the Agreement) with a bank which provides for a revolving
line of credit (the Revolver) and an equipment line of credit (the Equipment
Line).
The Revolver, which allowed the Company to borrow up to $1,500,000, was renewed
for one year in June 2000 with a maximum borrowing amount of $2,500,000.
Borrowings under the Revolver, collateralized by substantially all assets of the
Company, are payable at maturity and bear interest at the bank's prime rate
(8.5% at December 31, 2000) plus 1% per annum. The Agreement requires the
Company to maintain certain financial covenants including a minimum quick ratio,
tangible net worth and liquidity, as defined. The Agreement also prohibits the
payment of dividends. At December 31, 2000, there were no borrowings under the
Revolver. However, the Company had posted $678,000 of letters of credit against
the Revolver.
The Company borrowed $505,634 under the Equipment Line during 1999 for purposes
of equipment purchases. Borrowings under the Equipment Line bear interest at the
bank's prime rate (8.5% at December 31, 2000) plus 1.5% and are payable in 36
equal monthly installments of principal and interest through August 2002. At
December 31, 2000, there was no availability under the Equipment Line. The
amounts under this facility have been included in long term debt in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2000 and 1999.
27
RISK FACTORS
ANY INVESTMENT IN OUR SHARES OF COMMON STOCK INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. YOU
SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE RISKS DESCRIBED BELOW, WHICH WE BELIEVE ARE ALL
THE MATERIAL RISKS TO OUR BUSINESS, INCLUDING THE BUSINESS OF
PRICEINTERACTIVE, INC. OF RESTON, VIRGINIA, WITH WHOM WE ENTERED INTO A MERGER
AGREEMENT ON DECEMBER 12, 2000, TOGETHER WITH THE INFORMATION CONTAINED
ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT, BEFORE YOU MAKE A DECISION TO INVEST IN OUR COMPANY.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR OPERATIONS
WE HAVE A LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY UPON WHICH TO BASE YOUR INVESTMENT DECISION,
AND YOU MAY INACCURATELY ASSESS OUR PROSPECTS FOR SUCCESS.
We were incorporated in August 1996 and first began to offer commercial services
in May 1997. Due to our limited operating history, it is difficult for us to
predict future results of operations both for our core business and our enhanced
service offerings. Moreover, we cannot be sure that we have accurately
identified all of the risks to our business, especially because we use new, and
in many cases, unproven technologies and provide new services, the technical
implementation of which on a commercial scale, and widespread commercial
acceptance of, is yet unproven. As a result, our past results and rates of
growth may not be meaningful indicators of our future results of operations.
Also, your assessment of the prospects for our success may prove inaccurate.
WE HAVE A HISTORY OF OPERATING LOSSES AND MAY NEVER BECOME PROFITABLE.
During 2000, we incurred a net loss of $62.3 million. As of December 31, 2000 we
had an accumulated deficit of $90.1 million. We expect to continue to incur
operating losses and negative cash flows as we incur significant operating
expenses and make capital investments in our business. Our future profitability
will depend on our being able to deliver calls over our network at a cost to us
that is less than what we are able to charge for our calls, and utilize our
network to deliver new, enhanced services on a profitable basis.
Our costs to deliver calls are dependent on a number of factors, including the
countries to which we direct calls and whether we are able to use the Internet,
rather than another component of our network or more expensive back-up networks,
to deliver calls. The prices that we are able to charge to deliver calls over
our network vary, based primarily on the prices currently prevailing in the
international long distance carrier market to specific countries. While we are
currently able to terminate a substantial number of the calls carried over our
network profitably on an operating basis, we have been unable to operate our
entire network profitably on an operating basis for sustained periods of time.
Our ability to deliver new capabilities like unified communications and our
Global Spoken Web also depends on a variety of factors. Unified Communications,
for which we use the brand name VoCore, allows our customers to offer end users
voicemail, email, and faxes accessible from a variety of devices, including
telephones and personal computers. The Global Spoken Web initiative is intended
to bring together a network of speech sites, making Web content and other
applications such as customer relationship management accessible through speech
recognition technology over the telephone.
We have not yet recognized revenues from VoCore or our Global Spoken Web
initiative and PriceInteractive's SpeechPort service, described in
"Business--Company Overview," offering to be acquired in the merger has achieved
only relatively small amounts of revenue to date. It may take longer than we
expect to gain acceptance in the market for these services. In addition, we may
be unable to make effective use of the technology we employ, scale the service
for wide use, or leverage our network infrastructure adequately to take
advantage of possible economies of scale.
28
We may not ever generate sufficient revenues, or reduce costs to the extent
necessary, to permit us to achieve profitability. Even if we do become
profitable, we may not sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or
annual basis in the future.
FLUCTUATIONS IN OUR QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS THAT RESULT FROM VARIOUS
FACTORS INHERENT IN OUR BUSINESS MAY CAUSE THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK
TO FALL.
Our revenue and results of operations have fluctuated and may continue to
fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter in the future due to a number of
factors, many of which are not in our control, including, among others:
- the amount of traffic we are able to sell to our customers, and their
decisions on whether to route traffic over our network;
- our ability to generate revenues from the delivery of new value-added
capabilities like VoCore and our Global Spoken Web initiative and
PriceInteractive's SpeechPort offering that are appealing to the market;
- pricing pressure in the international long distance market;
- the percentage of traffic that we are able to carry over the Internet, or
over our dedicated international private circuit lines, rather than over
the more costly traditional public-switched telephone network;
- loss of arbitrage opportunities resulting from declines in international
settlement rates or tariffs;
- our ability to negotiate lower termination fees charged by our local
providers if our pricing deteriorates;
- our continuing ability to negotiate competitive costs to interconnect our
network with those of other carriers;
- capital expenditures required to expand or upgrade our network;
- changes in call volume among the countries to which we complete calls;
- the portion of our total traffic that we carry over more attractive routes
could fall, independent of route-specific price, cost or volume changes;
- technical difficulties or failures of our network systems or third-party
delays in expansion or provisioning system problems; and
- currency fluctuations in countries where we operate.
Because of these factors, you should not rely on quarter-to-quarter comparisons
of our results of operations as an indication of our future performance. It is
possible that, in future periods, our results of operations will be
significantly lower than the estimates of public market analysts and investors.
Such a discrepancy could cause the price of our common stock to decline
significantly.
WE MAY NEVER GENERATE SUFFICIENT REVENUE TO ATTAIN PROFITABILITY IF
TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS AND OTHER COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE PROVIDERS ARE
RELUCTANT TO USE OUR SERVICES OR DO NOT USE OUR SERVICES, INCLUDING ANY NEW
SERVICES, IN SUFFICIENT VOLUME.
If the market for Internet telephony and other new services does not develop as
we expect, or develops more slowly than expected, our business, financial
condition and results of operations will be materially and adversely affected.
29
Our customers may be reluctant to use our Internet telephony services for a
number of reasons, including:
- perceptions that the quality of voice transmitted over the Internet is
low;
- perceptions that Internet telephony is unreliable;
- our inability to deliver traffic over the Internet with significant cost
advantages; and
- development of their own capacity on routes served by us.
Our potential customers for our new services, including the service offerings
acquired from PriceInteractive, may be reluctant to use these services as a
result of perceptions that our enhanced services are unnecessary, too expensive,
ineffective, or not appealing to their end-user customers or client base.
The growth of our core business depends on carriers and other communications
service providers generating an increased volume of international voice and fax
traffic and selecting our network to carry at least some of this traffic. If the
volume of international voice and fax traffic fails to increase, or decreases,
and these third-parties do not employ our network, our ability to become
profitable will be materially and adversely affected.
In addition, we cannot assure investors that communications service providers
and their end-user customers and others will be receptive to, and subscribe to,
unified communications services, or any other enhanced services that we elect to
deploy on our network. Any perceived problems with the reliability or
functionality of any new services that we offer could discourage communications
service providers or others from offering these services to their customers. In
addition, the development of new capabilities, such as VoCore and Global Spoken
Web, may require substantial additional capital expenditures to be made well in
advance of generating any revenue from such services or demonstrating any market
acceptance of such services. If carriers, communications service providers do
not employ our network to offer any new services to their customers, or if their
customers do not subscribe for the services when offered, our results of
operations will be materially adversely affected.
We cannot assure you that end-users will continue to purchase services from our
customers or that our customers will maintain a demand for our services.
WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY INTEGRATE PRICEINTERACTIVE AND ACHIEVE THE
BENEFITS EXPECTED TO RESULT FROM THE MERGER.
On December 12, 2000, we entered into a merger agreement with
PriceInteractive, Inc. pursuant to which PriceInteractive, Inc. will be merged
with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of iBasis. We entered into the merger
agreement with the expectation that the merger will result in mutual benefits
including, among other things, benefits relating to expanded and complementary
product offerings, enhanced revenues, increased market opportunity, new
technology and the addition of engineering personnel. Achieving the benefits of
the merger will depend in part on the integration of our technology, operations
and personnel in a timely and efficient manner so as to minimize the risk that
the merger will result in the loss of market opportunity or key employees or the
diversion of the attention of management. Among the challenges involved in this
integration are demonstrating to our customers that the merger will not result
in adverse changes in service standards or business focus and persuading our
personnel that our business cultures are compatible.
In addition, PriceInteractive's principal offices are located in Reston,
Virginia, and our principal offices are located in Burlington, Massachusetts. We
intend to keep most of the operations of PriceInteractive in Reston. We must
successfully integrate PriceInteractive's operations and personnel with our
operations and personnel for the merger to be successful. We cannot assure you
that we will successfully integrate or profitably manage PriceInteractive's
businesses. In addition, we cannot assure
30
you that, following the transaction, our businesses will achieve revenues
specific net income or loss levels, efficiencies or synergies that justify the
merger or that the merger will result in increased earnings for the combined
company in any future period. Further, the combined company may experience
slower rates of growth as compared to historical rates of growth of them
independently.
IF WE DO NOT INTEGRATE PRICEINTERACTIVE'S TECHNOLOGIES AND OPERATIONS QUICKLY
AND EFFECTIVELY, SOME OR ALL OF THE POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF THE MERGER MAY NOT
OCCUR.
We must make PriceInteractive's technology, products and services operate
together with our technologies, products and services. If we do not integrate
their operations and technologies quickly and smoothly, serious harm to the
combined company's business, financial condition and prospects may result.
Integrating the two businesses will entail significant diversion of management's
time and attention. We may be required to spend additional time or money on
integration that would otherwise be spent on developing their business and
services or other matters. In addition, the integration may require the partial
or wholesale conversion or redesign of some or all of the technologies, products
and services of either iBasis or PriceInteractive.
THE LOSS OF KEY PRICEINTERACTIVE PERSONNEL COULD MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO COMPLETE
EXISTING PROJECTS AND UNDERTAKE NEW PROJECTS.
The success of the combined company will depend on its ability to identify, hire
and retain employees, and a significant component of the value of the merger is
in the know-how and experience of PriceInteractive employees that we expect to
employ. If key PriceInteractive employees were to leave after the merger, we may
be unable to complete existing PriceInteractive projects or to undertake new
projects, each of which could materially impair our future earnings and results
of operations. We do not have employment agreements that provide for a fixed
term of employment with most of the key employees of PriceInteractive.
WE EXPECT TO INCUR SUBSTANTIAL TRANSACTION, CONSOLIDATION AND INTEGRATION COSTS
RELATED TO THE MERGER.
Whether or not the merger with PriceInteractive is consummated, we will have
incurred substantial expenses. We estimate that, if the merger is consummated,
the combined company will incur transaction costs of approximately $3.2 million
including investment banking, legal, accounting and printing fees. We expect
that we will also incur significant consolidation and integration expenses that
we cannot accurately estimate at this time. We expect that the combined company
will charge the majority of these consolidation and integration costs and
expenses to operations in fiscal 2001. The amount of the transaction costs is a
preliminary estimate and is subject to change. Actual transaction costs may
substantially exceed our estimates and, when combined with the expenses incurred
in connection with the consolidation and integration of our companies, could
have an adverse effect on the business, financial condition and operating
results of the combined company.
THE ACCOUNTING TREATMENT OF THE MERGER WILL RESULT IN SIGNIFICANT CHARGES TO OUR
OPERATIONS.
We intend to account for the merger with PriceInteractive as a purchase for
financial reporting and accounting purposes, under United States generally
accepted accounting principles, with us acquiring PriceInteractive. After
completion of the merger, the results of operations of PriceInteractive will be
included in the consolidated financial statements of iBasis from the date of the
merger. The purchase price will be allocated to PriceInteractive's assets and
liabilities based on the fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities
assumed. Any excess of cost over the fair value of the net tangible assets of
PriceInteractive and identifiable intangible assets acquired will be classified
as goodwill and other intangible assets, including in-process research and
development. Goodwill and other intangibles will be amortized by charges to
operations over their estimated useful lives of three to four years and
in-process research and development will be charged to operations at the time of
closing in accordance
31
with United States generally accepted accounting principles. We will also record
stock-based compensation relating to the issuance of options to PriceInteractive
employees. The amount of charges for stock-based compensation, in-process
research and development and amortization of goodwill and other intangibles will
be significant and will therefore have a material negative impact on the
combined company's future operating results which could cause our stock price to
decline.
WE MAY FACE QUALITY AND CAPACITY PROBLEMS OVER OUR NETWORK UPON FAILURES BY
THIRD PARTIES.
VENDORS. We rely upon third-party vendors to provide us with the equipment and
software that we use to transfer and translate calls from traditional voice
networks to the Internet, and vice versa. For example, we purchase substantially
all of our Internet telephony equipment from Cisco Systems. PriceInteractive
relies upon third-party venders to provide its business with speech recognition
technology. We cannot assure you that we will be able to continue purchasing
such equipment and software from our vendors, and, following the merger,
PriceInteractive's vendors, on acceptable terms, if at all. If we become unable
to purchase from such vendors the software and equipment needed to maintain and
expand our network as currently configured and to provide services currently
provided by PriceInteractive, we may not be able to maintain or expand our
network to accommodate growth or provide the services currently provided by
PriceInteractive and we may consequently be unable to increase revenues
sufficiently to become profitable. See also "Strategic Relationships," below.
PARTIES THAT MAINTAIN PHONE AND DATA LINES. Our business model depends on the
availability of the Internet and traditional telephone networks to transmit
voice and fax calls, and to provide other enhanced services. Third parties
maintain and, in many cases, own these networks and other components that
comprise the Internet. Some of these third parties are national telephone
companies. They may increase their charges for using these lines at any time and
decrease our profitability. They may also fail to maintain their lines properly
and disrupt our ability to provide service to our customers. Any failure by
these third parties to maintain these lines and networks that leads to a
material disruption of our ability to complete calls or provide other services
could discourage our customers from using our network or enhanced services,
which could have the effect of delaying or preventing our ability to become
profitable.
LOCAL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE PROVIDERS. We maintain relationships with local
communications service providers in many countries, some of whom own the
equipment that translates voice to data in that country. We rely upon these
third parties both to provide lines over which we complete calls and to increase
their capacity when necessary as the volume of our traffic increases. There is a
risk that these third parties may be slow, or fail, to provide lines, which
would affect our ability to complete calls to those destinations. We cannot
assure you that we will be able to continue our relationships with these local
service providers on acceptable terms, if at all. Because we rely upon entering
into relationships with local service providers to expand into additional
countries, we cannot assure you that we will be able to increase the number of
countries to which we provide service. We also may not be able to enter into
relationships with enough overseas local service providers to handle increases
in the volume of calls that we receive from our customers. Finally, any
technical difficulties that these providers suffer would affect our ability to
transmit calls to the countries that those providers help serve.
STRATEGIC RELATIONSHIPS. We depend in part on our strategic relationships to
expand our distribution channels and develop and market our services. In
particular, we depend in large part on our joint marketing and product
development efforts with Cisco Systems to achieve market acceptance and brand
recognition in certain markets. Our VoCore product relies on technology and
services from companies such as OpenWave (formerly Software.com), EMC and
Hewlett-Packard. Strategic relationship partners may choose not to renew
existing arrangements on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. In addition,
PriceInteractive also depends in part on its strategic relationships with
SpeechWorks International, Inc. and MicroStrategy. In general, if we lose these
key strategic
32
relationships, or if we fail to maintain or develop new relationships in the
future, our ability to expand the scope and capacity of our network and services
provided, and to maintain state-of-the-art technology, would be materially
adversely affected. Our Global Spoken Web initiative will also rely on key
strategic relationships, which will be subject to the same considerations.
THE MARKET DEMAND FOR VOCORE AS WELL AS VOICE SITES AND SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH
OUR GLOBAL SPOKEN WEB INITIATIVE AND SPEECH RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY GENERALLY MAY
NOT DEVELOP AS ANTICIPATED, WHICH WOULD SUBSTANTIALLY IMPEDE OUR ABILITY TO
GENERATE REVENUES.
Our future financial performance depends in part on growth in demand for VoCore
and new services such as voice application and speech recognition services and
products. If the market for these services and products does not develop or if
we are unable to capture a significant portion of that market, either directly
or through our partners, our revenues and our results of operations will be
adversely affected. The markets for unified communications and voice application
services and products is, including PriceInteractive's products and services,
relatively new and evolving. The adoption of such services and products could be
hindered by the perceived cost, quality and reliability of these new
technologies, as well as the reluctance among businesses that have invested
substantially in legacy equipment that provide traditional email, voicemail
and/or touch-tone-based, interactive voice response and other systems.
The continued development of the market for our enhanced services and products
will depend upon the:
- widespread adoption of voice-driven applications by businesses for use in
conducting transactions and managing relationships with their customers;
- widespread adoption of solutions to unify a variety of communications
modes through one solution;
- consumer acceptance of such applications; and
- continuing improvements in hardware and software technology that may
reduce the cost and improve the performance of voice solutions.
The market for speech-activated services is new and potential industry
standards, such as VoiceXML, have not yet matured. If multiple standards are
adopted, we may need to support them, which would require additional time and
resources, and could negatively impact revenue and margins.
Even if the demand for VoCore and new voice application services and products
does grow, if we fail to meet subscriber expectations, the market ability of the
VoCore offering and any other product could be materially reduced.
THE QUALITY OF SPEECH APPLICATIONS OVER AN IP NETWORK HAS NOT YET BEEN FULLY
PROVEN AND FAILURES BY VOICE SITE PROVIDERS TO ADOPT THESE APPLICATIONS MAY HAVE
A MATERIAL NEGATIVE IMPACT ON OUR FUTURE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
Speech applications, such as our Global Spoken Web and PriceInteractive's
SpeechPort, have not been extensively tested on IP infrastructures. If
performance and accuracy of speech services are negatively affected by a
particular IP infrastructure, the commercial acceptance of these applications by
voice site providers on that infrastructure will be low. Failure by voice site
providers to adopt these applications may have a material negative impact on our
results of operations which could cause our stock price to decline. As an
international company, iBasis is dependent upon the further development of
text-to-speech and speech recognition applications in multiple languages.
33
OUR CUSTOMERS MAY REQUIRE A LONGER SALES AND IMPLEMENTATION CYCLE, WHICH COULD
NEGATIVELY AFFECT OUR REVENUE PLANS.
If actual sales and development cycles for our enhanced offerings or offerings
of PriceInteractive acquired in the merger are substantially longer than
anticipated, revenue targets would not be met. The failure or lack of effective
third-party technologies and services could limit our ability to generate
revenues. Some of our intended enhanced services offerings and the service
offerings acquired in the merger from PriceInteractive are dependent on
technology developed by third parties. These technologies include:
- email servers that process both email messages and voicemail messages;
- software that converts text to speech;
- speech recognition software;
- billing system software; and
- network operations center servers, routers and other equipment.
We will continue to incorporate third-party technologies in future unified
communications and speech application services and products. We have limited
control over whether or when these third-party technologies will be enhanced. In
addition, our competitors may acquire interests in these third parties or their
technologies, which may render the technology unavailable to us. If a third
party fails or refuses to timely develop, license or support technology
necessary to our services or products, market acceptance of our services or
products could be adversely affected. Moreover, if these third-party
technologies fail or otherwise prove to be not viable, it may have a significant
impact on our ability to provide our services and/or to generate revenues. In
addition, we rely and will continue to rely on services supplied by third
parties such as telecommunications, Internet access and electrical power for
services hosted in our network operations center. If these third-party services
fail to meet industry standards for quality and reliability, market acceptance
of our services could be adversely affected.
WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SUCCEED IN THE INTENSELY COMPETITIVE MARKET FOR OUR
VARIOUS SERVICES.
The market for Internet voice, fax and other enhanced services is extremely
competitive and will likely become more competitive. Internet protocol and
Internet telephony service providers, such as GRIC Communications and ITXC
Corp., route traffic to destinations worldwide and compete directly with us.
Also, Internet telephony service providers, such as Net2Phone, that presently
focus on retail customers, may in the future enter our market and compete with
us. Such retail-oriented carriers also provide PC-to-PC services at very low
prices or for free. Perceived competition with this market segment could drive
our prices down. In addition, major telecommunications carriers, such as AT&T,
Deutsche Telekom, MCI WorldCom and Qwest Communications, have all entered or
announced plans to enter the Internet telephony market. In particular, AT&T
invested over $2 billion in Net2Phone in April.
We also face competition from other companies who offer unified communications
and speech recognition applications. We directly compete at the wholesale level
with a number of other unified communications providers such as deltathree.com,
Orchestrate, Tornado Development, and uReach. Some of the competition (e.g.
deltathree.com and Tornado Development) sell unified communications directly to
end users in addition to selling at the wholesale level. Furthermore, voice
portal companies such as TellMe and BeVocal may in the future develop business
models that compete directly with our Global Spoken Web business. Many of these
companies are larger than we are and have substantially greater managerial and
financial resources than we do. Intense competition in our markets can be
expected to continue to impose downward pressure on prices and adversely affect
our profitability. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete
successfully against our competitors and we may lose customers or fail to grow
our business as a result of this competition.
34
WE ARE SUBJECT TO DOWNWARD PRICING PRESSURES ON OUR WHOLESALE INTERNATIONAL
INTERNET TELEPHONY SERVICES AND A CONTINUING NEED TO RENEGOTIATE OVERSEAS RATES
WHICH COULD DELAY OR PREVENT OUR PROFITABILITY.
As a result of numerous factors, including increased competition and global
deregulation of telecommunications services, prices for international long
distance calls have been decreasing. This downward trend of prices to end-users
has caused us to lower the prices we charge communications service providers for
call completion on our network. If this downward pricing pressure continues, we
cannot assure you that we will be able to offer Internet telephony services at
costs lower than, or competitive with, the traditional voice network services
with which we compete. Moreover, in order for us to lower our prices, we have to
renegotiate rates with our overseas local service providers who complete calls
for us. We may not be able to renegotiate these terms favorably enough, or fast
enough, to allow us to continue to offer services in a particular country on a
cost-effective basis. The continued downward pressure on prices and our failure
to renegotiate favorable terms in a particular country would have a material
adverse effect on our ability to operate our network and Internet telephony
business profitably.
WE MAY FACE PRICING PRESSURES FROM FREE RETAIL UNIFIED COMMUNICATION/UNIFIED
MESSAGING OFFERINGS.
Some unified communication or unified messaging services providers have a free
retail offering. In particular, Onebox, a service of OpenWave, offers services
similar to VoCore with limited functionality for no charge. Free retail unified
communications could become a prevalent model putting significant pricing
pressure on fee-based offerings at the wholesale level. This could have an
adverse affect on iBasis' ability to generate revenue and margins on VoCore
services.
A VARIETY OF RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS COULD MATERIALLY
ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS.
Because we provide many of our services internationally, we are subject to
additional risks related to operating in foreign countries. In particular, in
order to provide services and operate facilities in some countries, we have
established subsidiaries or other legal entities. Associated risks include:
- unexpected changes in tariffs, trade barriers and regulatory requirements
relating to Internet access or Internet telephony, or enhanced services;
- economic weakness, including inflation, or political instability in
particular foreign economies and markets;
- difficulty in collecting accounts receivable; compliance with tax,
employment immigration and labor laws for employees living and traveling
abroad;
- foreign taxes including withholding of payroll taxes; and
- foreign currency fluctuations, which could result in increased operating
expenses and reduced revenues; and other obligations incident to doing
business or operating a subsidiary in another country.
In addition, we are subject to a variety of risks associated with the provision
of unified communications and international voice site business management, any
of which could negatively affect our business. These risks include providing
easy telephone access to the iBasis network and relying on third party vendors
to create and refine different language models for each particular language or
dialect. These language models are required to create versions of our products
that allow end users to speak the local language or dialect and be understood
and authenticated. If vendors fail to develop localized versions of our
products, our ability to address international market opportunities and to grow
our business will be limited.
35
These and other risks associated with our international operations may
materially adversely affect our ability to attain or maintain profitable
operations.
A significant portion of our revenue was generated by delivering calls to Asian
Middle Eastern and Latin American countries. Many countries in these geographic
regions have experienced political and economic instability over the past
decade. Repeated political or economic instability in countries to which we
deliver substantial volumes of traffic could lead to difficulties in completing
calls through our regional service providers or decreased call volume to such
countries.
IF WE ARE NOT ABLE TO KEEP UP WITH RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE IN A
COST-EFFECTIVE WAY, THE RELATIVE QUALITY OF OUR SERVICES COULD SUFFER.
The technology upon which our services, and the services acquired from
PriceInteractive in the merger, depend is changing rapidly. Significant
technological changes could render the hardware and software which we use
obsolete, and competitors may begin to offer new services that we are unable to
offer. We must adapt to our rapidly changing market by continually improving the
responsiveness, reliability, services and features of our network and by
developing new features and applications to meet customer needs. If we are
unable to respond successfully to these developments or do not respond in a
cost-effective way, we may not be able to offer competitive services.
WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO EXPAND AND UPGRADE OUR NETWORK ADEQUATELY AND
COST-EFFECTIVELY TO ACCOMMODATE ANY FUTURE GROWTH.
Our Internet telephony business requires that we handle a large number of
international calls simultaneously. As we expand our operations, we expect to
handle significantly more calls. We will need to expand and upgrade our hardware
and software to accommodate such increased traffic. If we do not expand and
upgrade quickly enough, we will not have sufficient capacity to handle the
traffic and growth in our operating performance would suffer. Even with such
expansion, we may be unable to manage new deployments or utilize them in a
cost-effective manner. In addition to lost growth opportunities, any such
failure could adversely affect customer confidence in the iBasis Network and
could result in us losing business outright.
IF WE FAIL TO MANAGE OUR GROWTH, WE COULD LOSE CUSTOMERS.
We have grown rapidly to date and expect to continue to grow rapidly. In order
to increase the number of our customers and the size of our operations, we will
need to improve our administrative, accounting, operating systems and controls,
as well as integrate those of PriceInteractive following the merger. We may need
to redesign several internal systems. Our attention to these matters may
distract us from other aspects of our business. Moreover, failure to implement
new systems and controls, or to integrate those of PriceInteractive, may hamper
our ability to provide services to customers and may impair the quality of our
services which could result in the loss of customers.
OUR REVENUE WOULD DECLINE SIGNIFICANTLY IF WE LOSE ONE OR MORE OF OUR MOST
SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS.
We generate much of our revenue from a limited number of customers. Customers
may discontinue their use of our services at any time, and without notice.
Therefore, in any given quarter, we would lose a significant amount of revenue
if we lost one or more of our major customers.
WE DEPEND ON OUR KEY PERSONNEL AND MAY HAVE DIFFICULTY ATTRACTING AND RETAINING
THE SKILLED EMPLOYEES WE NEED TO EXECUTE OUR GROWTH PLANS.
WE DEPEND HEAVILY ON OUR KEY MANAGEMENT. Our future success will depend, in
large part, on the continued service of our key management and technical
personnel, including Ofer Gneezy, our President and Chief Executive Officer,
Gordon VanderBrug, our Executive Vice President, Michael
36
Hughes, our Chief Financial Officer, and Charles Giambalvo, our Senior Vice
President of Worldwide Sales. If any of these individuals or others at the
Company are unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, our
business, financial condition and results of operations would suffer. We do not
carry key person life insurance on our personnel. While each of the individuals
named above has entered into an employment agreement with us, these agreements
do not ensure their continued employment with us.
WE WILL NEED TO ATTRACT SKILLED PERSONNEL TO EXECUTE OUR GROWTH PLANS. Our
future success will depend, in large part, on our ability to attract, retain and
motivate highly skilled employees, particularly engineering and technical
personnel. Competition for such employees in our industry is intense. We have
from time to time in the past experienced, and we expect to continue to
experience in the future, difficulty in hiring and retaining employees with
appropriate qualifications. We may not be able to retain our employees or
attract, assimilate or retain other highly qualified employees in the future. If
we do not succeed in attracting and retaining skilled personnel, we may not be
able to grow at a sufficient rate to attain profitable operations.
A FAILURE TO OBTAIN NECESSARY ADDITIONAL CAPITAL IN THE FUTURE ON ACCEPTABLE
TERMS COULD PREVENT US FROM EXECUTING OUR BUSINESS PLAN.
We may need additional capital in the future to fund our operations, finance
investments in equipment and corporate infrastructure, expand our network,
increase the range of services we offer and respond to competitive pressures and
perceived opportunities. Cash flow from operations, and cash on hand may not be
sufficient to cover our operating expenses and capital investment needs. We
cannot assure you that additional financing will be available on terms
acceptable to us, if at all. A failure to obtain additional funding could
prevent us from making expenditures that are needed to allow us to grow or
maintain our operations.
If we raise additional funds by selling equity securities, the relative equity
ownership of our existing investors could be diluted or the new investors could
obtain terms more favorable than previous investors. If we raise additional
funds through debt financing, we could incur significant borrowing costs. The
failure to obtain additional financing when required could result in us being
unable to grow as required to attain profitable operations.
IF WE ARE UNABLE TO PROTECT OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, OUR COMPETITIVE POSITION
WOULD BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED.
We rely on trademark and copyright law, trade secret protection and
confidentiality and/or license agreements with our employees, customers,
partners and others to protect our intellectual property. Unauthorized third
parties may copy our services or reverse engineer or obtain and use information
that we regard as proprietary. End-user license provisions protecting against
unauthorized use, copying, transfer and disclosure of any licensed program may
be unenforceable under the laws of certain jurisdictions and foreign countries.
While we do not have any patents pending, following the acquisition of
PriceInteractive, we will own rights to certain patents, patent applications,
and other additional intellectual property. In addition, we may seek to patent
certain software or equipment in the future. We do not know if any of our future
patent applications will be issued with the scope of the claims we seek, if at
all. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary
rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. Our means of
protecting our proprietary rights in the United States or abroad may not be
adequate and third parties may infringe or misappropriate our copyrights,
trademarks and similar proprietary rights. If we fail to protect our
intellectual property and proprietary rights, our business, financial condition
and results of operations would suffer.
We believe that we do not infringe upon the proprietary rights of any third
party, and no third party has asserted a material patent infringement claim
against us. It is possible, however, that such a claim
37
might be asserted successfully against us in the future. Our ability to provide
our services depends on our freedom to operate. That is, we must ensure that we
do not infringe upon the proprietary rights of others or have licensed all such
rights. Neither we nor PriceInteractive have requested or obtained an opinion
from counsel as to whether our services infringe upon the intellectual property
rights of any third parties. A party making an infringement claim could secure a
substantial monetary award or obtain injunctive relief that could effectively
block our ability to provide services in the United States or abroad.
We and PriceInteractive have received letters and other notices claiming that
certain of our and PriceInteractive's products and services may infringe patents
or other intellectual property of other parties. To date, none of these has
resulted in a material restriction on any use of our intellectual property or
has had a material adverse impact on our business. We may be unaware of
intellectual property rights of others that may, or may be claimed, to cover our
technology or that of PriceInteractive. Current or future claims could result in
costly litigation and divert the attention of management and key personnel from
other business issues. The complexity of the technology involved and the
uncertainty of intellectual property litigation increase these risks. Claims of
intellectual property infringement also might require us to enter into costly
royalty or license agreements to the extent necessary for the conduct of our
business. However, we may be unable to obtain royalty or license agreements on
terms acceptable to us or at all. We also may be subject to significant damages
or an injunction against use of our proprietary or licenses systems. A
successful claim of patent or other intellectual property infringement against
us could materially adversely affect our business and profitability.
We and PriceInteractive rely on a variety of technology, primarily software,
that is licensed from third parties. Continued use of this technology by us or
PriceInteractive require that we purchase new or additional licenses from third
parties. There can be no assurances that we can obtain those third-party
licenses needed for our business or that the third party technology licenses
that we do have will continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable
terms or at all. The loss or inability to maintain or obtain upgrades to any of
these technology licenses could result in delays or breakdowns in our ability to
continue developing and providing our services or to enhance and upgrade our
services.
WE MAY UNDERTAKE ADDITIONAL STRATEGIC ACQUISITIONS IN THE FUTURE AND ANY
DIFFICULTIES FROM INTEGRATING SUCH ACQUISITIONS COULD DAMAGE OUR ABILITY TO
ATTAIN OR MAINTAIN PROFITABILITY.
We may acquire additional businesses and technologies that complement or augment
our existing businesses, services and technologies. Integrating any newly
acquired businesses or technologies could be expensive and time-consuming. We
may not be able to integrate any acquired business successfully. Moreover, we
may need to raise additional funds through public or private debt or equity
financing to acquire any businesses, which may result in dilution for
stockholders and the incurrence of indebtedness. We may not be able to operate
acquired businesses profitably or otherwise implement our growth strategy
successfully.
38
RISKS RELATED TO THE INTERNET AND INTERNET TELEPHONY INDUSTRY
IF THE INTERNET DOES NOT CONTINUE TO GROW AS A MEDIUM FOR VOICE AND FAX
COMMUNICATIONS AND OTHER ENHANCED SERVICES, OUR BUSINESS WILL SUFFER.
The technology that allows voice and fax communications over the Internet, and
the delivery of other enhanced services and capabilities like VoCore, the Global
Spoken Web initiative and PriceInteractive's services, are still in the early
stages of development. Historically, the sound quality of calls placed over the
Internet was poor. As the Internet telephony industry has grown, sound quality
has improved, but the technology requires further refinement. Additionally, as a
result of the Internet's capacity constraints, callers could experience delays,
errors in transmissions or other interruptions in service. Transmitting
telephone calls over the Internet, and other uses of the Internet for our
enhanced services, must also be accepted by customers as an alternative to
traditional services. Because the Internet telephony market and markets for our
enhanced services are new and evolving, predicting the size of these markets and
their growth rate is difficult. If our market fails to develop, then we will be
unable to grow our customer base and our results of operations will be adversely
affected.
IF THE INTERNET INFRASTRUCTURE IS NOT ADEQUATELY MAINTAINED, WE MAY BE UNABLE TO
MAINTAIN THE QUALITY OF OUR SERVICES AND PROVIDE THEM IN A TIMELY AND CONSISTENT
MANNER.
Our future success will depend upon the maintenance of the Internet
infrastructure, including a reliable network backbone with the necessary speed,
data capacity and security for providing reliability and timely Internet access
and services. To the extent that the Internet continues to experience increased
numbers of users, frequency of use or bandwith requirements, the Internet may
become congested and be unable to support the demands placed on it and its
performance or reliability may decline thereby impairing our ability to complete
calls and provide other services using the Internet at consistently high
quality. The Internet has experienced a variety of outages and other delays as a
result of failures of portions of its infrastructure or otherwise. Any future
outages or delays could adversely affect our ability to complete calls and
provide other services. Moreover, critical issues concerning the commercial use
of the Internet, including security, cost, ease of use and access, intellectual
property ownership and other legal liability issues, remain unresolved and could
materially and adversely affect both the growth of Internet usage generally and
our business in particular. Finally, important opportunities to grow traffic on
the iBasis network will not be realized if the underlying infrastructure of the
Internet does not continue to be expanded to more locations worldwide.
WE CANNOT BE CERTAIN THAT OUR ABILITY TO PROVIDE OUR SERVICES USING THE INTERNET
WILL NOT BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY COMPUTER VANDALISM.
If the overall performance of the Internet is seriously downgraded by Website
attacks or other acts of computer vandalism or virus infection, our ability to
deliver our communication services over the Internet could be adversely
impacted, which could cause us to have to increase the amount of traffic we have
to carry over alternative networks, including the more costly public-switched
telephone network. In addition, traditional business interruption insurance may
not cover losses we could incur because of any such disruption of the Internet.
While some insurers are beginning to offer products purporting to cover these
losses, we do not have any of this insurance at this time.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMPANY
INTERNATIONAL GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION AND LEGAL UNCERTAINTIES COULD LIMIT OUR
ABILITY TO PROVIDE OUR SERVICES OR MAKE THEM MORE EXPENSIVE.
The regulatory treatment of Internet telephony and our enhanced services
offerings outside of the United States varies widely by country. As discussed
more fully in the section entitled Government Regulation, a number of countries
currently prohibit or limit competition in the provision of traditional
39
voice telephony services. In some of those countries, licensed telephony
carriers as well as foreign regulators have questioned our legal authority
and/or the legal authority of our partners to offer our services. We may face
similar questions in additional countries. If we are forced to suspend or
discontinue certain operations as a result of foreign regulatory or legal
challenges, this could substantially affect our ability to achieve
profitability.
Some countries prohibit, limit or regulate how companies provide Internet
telephony. Some countries have indicated they will evaluate proposed Internet
telephony service on a case-by-case basis and determine whether to regulate it
as a voice service or as another telecommunications service, and in doing so
potentially impose subsidies or other costs on Internet telephony providers. In
addition, many countries have not yet addressed Internet telephony in their
legislation or regulations. Increased regulation of the Internet and/or Internet
telephony providers, or the prohibition of Internet telephony or related
services, including our enhanced offerings, in one or more countries, could
limit our ability to provide our services or make them more expensive. Finally,
international organizations such as the International Telecomunications Union
and the European Commission are continuing to examine whether Internet telephony
should continue to be subject to light regulation. Adverse recommendations by
these bodies could also limit our ability to provide services profitably.
In addition, as we make our services available in foreign countries, and as we
work to enable sales by our customers to end-users in foreign countries, such
countries may claim that we are required to qualify to do business in that
particular country, that we are otherwise subject to regulation, including
requirements to obtain authorization, or that we are prohibited in all cases
from conducting our business in that foreign country. We currently have
subsidiaries in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Hong Kong, Japan, Mexico, Peru,
the United Kingdom and Singapore, and a branch in the United Arab Emirates. We
are authorized to provide services in Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy,
Netherlands, Peru, Singapore, Spain, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom, and
the United States.
Our failure to qualify as a foreign corporation in a jurisdiction in which we
are required to do so or to comply with foreign laws and regulations could
seriously restrict our ability to provide services in such jurisdiction, or
limit our ability to enforce contacts in that jurisdiction. Our customers also
currently are, or in the future may become, subject to these same requirements.
We cannot assure you that our customers are currently in compliance with any
such requirements or that they will be able to continue to comply with any such
requirements. The failure of our customers to comply with applicable laws and
regulations could prevent us from being able to conduct business with them, and
would result in a loss of revenue for us. Additionally, it is possible that
countries may apply laws to transport services provided over the Internet,
including laws governing:
- sales and other taxes, including payroll withholding applications;
- user privacy;
- pricing controls;
- characteristics and quality of products and services;
- consumer protection;
- cross-border commerce, including laws that would impose tariffs, duties
and other import restrictions;
- copyright, trademark and patent infringement; and
- claims based on the nature and content of Internet materials, including
defamation, negligence and the failure to meet necessary obligations.
40
If foreign governments or other bodies begin to regulate or prohibit Internet
telephony or our other services, this regulation could have a material adverse
effect on our ability to attain or maintain profitability.
THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY IS SUBJECT TO DOMESTIC GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION
AND LEGAL UNCERTAINTIES THAT COULD PREVENT US FROM EXECUTING OUR BUSINESS PLAN.
While the Federal Communications Commission has tentatively decided that
information service providers, including Internet telephony providers, are not
telecommunications carriers for regulatory purposes, various companies have
challenged that decision. Some Congressional elements are dissatisfied with the
conclusions of the FCC and the FCC could impose greater or lesser regulation on
our industry. Such regulation could mean imposition of surcharges related to
such things as access or universal service. We cannot assure you that state
government agencies will not increasingly regulate Internet-related services.
Increased regulation of the Internet may slow its growth. This regulation may
also negatively impact the cost of doing business over the Internet and
materially adversely affect our ability to attain or maintain profitability.
We are not licensed to offer traditional telecommunications services in any U.S.
state and we have not filed tariffs for any service at the Federal
Communications Commission or at any state regulatory commission. Nonetheless, as
more fully discussed in the section of this prospectus entitled "Government
Regulation", aspects of our operations may currently be, or become, subject to
state or federal regulations governing licensing, universal service funding,
disclosure of confidential communications or other information, excise taxes,
transactions restricted by U.S. embargo and other reporting or compliance
requirements. This regulation may also negatively impact the cost of doing
business and materially adversely affect our ability to attain or maintain
profitability.
THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR SHARES MAY EXPERIENCE EXTREME PRICE AND VOLUME
FLUCTUATIONS FOR REASONS OVER WHICH WE HAVE LITTLE CONTROL.
The stock market has, from time to time, experienced, and is likely to continue
to experience, extreme price and volume fluctuations. Prices of securities of
Internet-related companies have been especially volatile and have often
fluctuated for reasons that are unrelated to the operating performance of the
affected companies. The market price of shares of our common stock has
fluctuated greatly since our initial public offering and could continue to
fluctuate due to a variety of factors. In the past, companies that have
experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been the objects
of securities class action litigation. If we were the object of securities class
action litigation, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our
management's attention and resources.
PROVISIONS OF OUR GOVERNING DOCUMENTS AND DELAWARE LAW COULD DISCOURAGE
ACQUISITION PROPOSALS OR DELAY A CHANGE IN CONTROL.
Our certificate of incorporation and by-laws contain anti-takeover provisions,
including those listed below, that could make it more difficult for a third
party to acquire control of our company, even if that change in control would be
beneficial to stockholders:
- our board of directors has the authority to issue common stock and
preferred stock, and to determine the price, rights and preferences of any
new series of preferred stock, without stockholder approval;
- our board of directors is divided into three classes, each serving
three-year terms;
- our stockholders need a supermajority of votes to amend key provisions of
our certificate of incorporation and by-laws;
- there are limitations on who can call special meetings of stockholders;
41
- our stockholders may not take action by written consent; and
- our stockholders must provide specified advance notice to nominate
directors or submit stockholder proposals.
In addition, provisions of Delaware law and our stock option plan may also
discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our company or unsolicited
acquisition proposals.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
To date, we have not engaged in trading market risk sensitive instruments or
purchasing hedging instruments that would be likely to expose us to market risk,
whether interest rate, foreign currency exchange, commodity price or equity
price risk. We have not purchased options or entered into swaps of forward or
futures contracts. Our primary market risk exposure is that of interest rate
risk on borrowings under our credit lines, which are subject to interest rates
based on the banks' prime rate, and a change in the applicable interest rate
would affect the rate at which we could borrow funds or finance equipment
purchases. While to date our global operations have generated revenues in United
States dollars, we are currently evaluating the impact of foreign currency
exchange risk on our results of operations as we continue to expand globally.
42
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PAGE
--------
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF IBASIS, INC.:
Report of Independent Public Accountants.................. 45
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and
1999.................................................... 46
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999
and 1998................................................ 47
Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) for
the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998........ 48
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998........................ 49
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................ 50
43
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To iBasis, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of iBasis, Inc. (a
Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the
related consolidated statements of operations, redeemable convertible preferred
stock and stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the three years
ended December 31, 2000. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of iBasis, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations
and its cash flows for the three years ended December 31, 2000 in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
January 26, 2001
44
IBASIS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------
2000 1999
ASSETS ------------ ------------
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $208,180,625 $123,665,961
Marketable securities..................................... 77,146,773 --
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of approximately $2,200,000 and $633,000,
respectively............................................ 17,343,294 5,404,338
Prepaid expenses and other current assets................. 5,883,560 964,675
------------ ------------
Total current assets.................................. 308,554,252 130,034,974
------------ ------------
Property and equipment, at cost:
Construction in process................................... 38,991,409 --
Network equipment......................................... 24,702,891 6,544,913
Equipment under capital lease............................. 44,765,170 16,430,153
Leasehold improvements.................................... 3,181,840 1,696,755
Computer software......................................... 5,749,908 782,244
Furniture and fixtures.................................... 680,276 154,970
------------ ------------
118,071,494 25,609,035
Less--Accumulated depreciation and amortization........... (18,201,384) (3,218,920)
------------ ------------
99,870,110 22,390,115
Deferred debt financing costs, net of accumulated
amortization of approximately $816,000 and $0,
respectively (Note 1(g)).................................. 4,356,708 --
Long term investments in marketable securities (Note
1(h))..................................................... 15,000,000 --
Long term investment in nonmarketable security (Note
1(h))..................................................... 5,000,000 --
Due from PriceInteractive (Note 10)......................... 10,000,000 --
Other assets................................................ 5,036,649 1,048,000
------------ ------------
$447,817,719 $153,473,089
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable.......................................... $ 9,080,409 $ 6,112,938
Accrued expenses.......................................... 14,855,026 4,391,296
Long term debt, current portion........................... 26,105,842 4,376,280
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities............................. 50,041,277 14,880,514
------------ ------------
Long term debt, net of current portion (Note 4)............. 190,880,257 11,688,843
Commitments (Note 7)
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock, $0.001 par value-
Authorized--85,000,000 shares
Issued and outstanding--34,203,083 and 31,642,728
shares, respectively.................................. 34,203 31,642
Additional paid-in capital................................ 298,572,842 156,887,447
Deferred compensation..................................... (1,604,462) (2,200,547)
Accumulated deficit....................................... (90,106,398) (27,814,810)
------------ ------------
Total stockholders' equity............................ 206,896,185 126,903,732
------------ ------------
$447,817,719 $153,473,089
============ ============
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
45
IBASIS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------------ ------------ -----------
Net revenue.......................................... $ 61,217,737 $ 19,417,102 $ 1,978,430
Operating expenses:
Data communications and telecommunications......... 60,594,423 21,006,774 2,729,980
Research and development........................... 15,167,902 6,183,391 1,673,884
Selling and marketing.............................. 19,351,822 5,568,399 1,160,448
General and administrative......................... 19,657,346 5,308,465 1,365,132
Depreciation and amortization...................... 15,717,929 2,997,355 363,821
(Gain) loss on disposal of property and
equipment........................................ -- (15,297) 531,129
------------ ------------ -----------
Total operating expenses............................. 130,489,422 41,049,087 7,824,394
------------ ------------ -----------
Loss from operations................................. (69,271,685) (21,631,985) (5,845,964)
Interest income...................................... 19,824,259 1,329,237 179,270
Interest expense..................................... (12,844,162) (835,593) (52,983)
Other income (expense), net.......................... -- 2,826 (6,826)
Minority interest in loss of joint venture........... -- 49,000 --
------------ ------------ -----------
Net loss........................................... (62,291,588) (21,086,515) (5,726,503)
Accretion of dividends on redeemable convertible
preferred stock.................................... -- (1,020,366) (219,205)
------------ ------------ -----------
Net loss applicable to common stockholders......... $(62,291,588) $(22,106,881) $(5,945,708)
============ ============ ===========
Net loss per share (Note 1(d)):
Basic and diluted net loss per share............... $ (1.85) $ (2.29) $ (0.99)
============ ============ ===========
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares
outstanding........................................ 33,611,538 9,655,253 6,022,551
============ ============ ===========
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
46
IBASIS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
SERIES B REDEEMABLE SERIES C REDEEMABLE SERIES A CONVERTIBLE
CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK PREFERRED STOCK
----------------------------- ----------------------------- ------------------------
$0.001
NUMBER REDEMPTION NUMBER REDEMPTION NUMBER PAR
OF SHARES VALUE OF SHARES VALUE OF SHARES VALUE
------------ -------------- ------------ -------------- ------------ ---------
Balance, December 31, 1997............. -- $ -- -- $ -- 805,250 $ 805
Sale of Series A convertible
preferred stock.................... -- -- -- -- 444,750 445
Sale of Series B redeemable
convertible preferred stock, net of
issuance costs of approximately
$57,000............................ 6,562,500 10,500,000 -- -- -- --
Accretion of dividends on Series B
redeemable convertible preferred
stock.............................. -- 219,205 -- -- -- --
Net loss............................. -- -- -- -- -- --
------------ -------------- ------------ -------------- ------------ ---------
Balance, December 31, 1998............. 6,562,500 10,719,205 -- -- 1,250,000 1,250
Sale of Series C redeemable convertible
preferred stock, net of issuance costs
of approximately $59,900.............. -- -- 5,744,103 25,101,740 -- --
Compensation expense related to
employee stock option grant........... -- -- -- -- -- --
Exercise of Class A common stock
options............................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Accretion of dividends on Series B
redeemable convertible preferred
stock................................. -- 541,541 -- -- -- --
Accretion of dividends on Series C
redeemable convertible preferred
stock................................. -- -- -- 478,825 -- --
Deferred compensation related to stock
options............................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Amortization of deferred
compensation.......................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Conversion of preferred stock and Class
B common stock to Class A common
stock................................. (6,562,500) (10,500,000) (5,744,103) (25,101,740) (1,250,000) (1,250)
Conversion of Class A common stock to
common stock.......................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Reclassification of dividends on Series
B and Series C redeemable convertible
preferred stock....................... -- (760,746) -- (478,825) -- --
Exercise of common stock options....... -- -- -- -- -- --
Sale of common stock under initial
public offering, net of issuance costs
of approximately $10,420,000.......... -- -- -- -- -- --
Net loss............................... -- -- -- -- -- --
------------ -------------- ------------ -------------- ------------ ---------
Balance, December 31, 1999............. -- -- -- -- -- --
Sale of common stock under secondary
public offering, net of issuance costs
of approximately $949,000............. -- -- -- -- -- --
Exercise of common stock options and
warrants.............................. -- -- -- -- -- --
Sale of common stock related to
employee stock purchase plan.......... -- -- -- -- -- --
Amortization of deferred
compensation.......................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Compensation expense related to
acceleration of option vesting........ -- -- -- -- -- --
Net loss............................... -- -- -- -- -- --
------------ -------------- ------------ -------------- ------------ ---------
Balance, December 31, 2000............. -- $ -- -- $ -- -- $ --
============ ============== ============ ============== ============ =========
CLASS A COMMON CLASS B COMMON
COMMON STOCK STOCK STOCK
------------------------ ----------------------- ------------------------
$0.001 $0.001 $0.001
NUMBER PAR NUMBER PAR NUMBER PAR
OF SHARES VALUE OF SHARES VALUE OF SHARES VALUE
------------ --------- ----------- --------- ------------ ---------
Balance, December 31, 1997............. -- $ -- 6,060,000 $ 6,060 1,500,000 $ 1,500
Sale of Series A convertible
preferred stock.................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Sale of Series B redeemable
convertible preferred stock, net of
issuance costs of approximately
$57,000............................ -- -- -- -- -- --
Accretion of dividends on Series B
redeemable convertible preferred
stock.............................. -- -- -- -- -- --
Net loss............................. -- -- -- -- -- --
------------ ------- ----------- -------- ------------ ---------
Balance, December 31, 1998............. -- -- 6,060,000 6,060 1,500,000 1,500
Sale of Series C redeemable convertible
preferred stock, net of issuance costs
of approximately $59,900.............. -- -- -- -- -- --
Compensation expense related to
employee stock option grant........... -- -- -- -- -- --
Exercise of Class A common stock
options............................... -- -- 121,750 122 -- --
Accretion of dividends on Series B
redeemable convertible preferred
stock................................. -- -- -- -- -- --
Accretion of dividends on Series C
redeemable convertible preferred
stock................................. -- -- -- -- -- --
Deferred compensation related to stock
options............................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Amortization of deferred
compensation.......................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Conversion of preferred stock and Class
B common stock to Class A common
stock................................. -- -- 17,556,603 17,556 (1,500,000) (1,500)
Conversion of Class A common stock to
common stock.......................... 23,738,353 23,738 (23,738,353) (23,738) -- --
Reclassification of dividends on Series
B and Series C redeemable convertible
preferred stock....................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Exercise of common stock options....... 84,375 84 -- -- -- --
Sale of common stock under initial
public offering, net of issuance costs
of approximately $10,420,000.......... 7,820,000 7,820 -- -- -- --
Net loss............................... -- -- -- -- -- --
------------ ------- ----------- -------- ------------ ---------
Balance, December 31, 1999............. 31,642,728 31,642 -- -- -- --
Sale of common stock under secondary
public offering, net of issuance costs
of approximately $949,000............. 2,026,637 2,027 -- -- -- --
Exercise of common stock options and
warrants.............................. 525,959 526 -- -- -- --
Sale of common stock related to
employee stock purchase plan.......... 7,759 8 -- -- -- --
Amortization of deferred
compensation.......................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Compensation expense related to
acceleration of option vesting........ -- -- -- -- -- --
Net loss............................... -- -- -- -- -- --
------------ ------- ----------- -------- ------------ ---------
Balance, December 31, 2000............. 34,203,083 $34,203 -- $ -- -- $ --
============ ======= =========== ======== ============ =========
TOTAL
ADDITIONAL STOCKHOLDERS'
PAID-IN DEFERRED ACCUMULATED EQUITY
CAPITAL COMPENSATION DEFICIT (DEFICIT)
------------ ------------- ------------ -------------
Balance, December 31, 1997............. $ 2,964,389 $ -- $(1,001,792) $ 1,970,962
Sale of Series A convertible
preferred stock.................... 1,333,806 -- -- 1,334,251
Sale of Series B redeemable
convertible preferred stock, net of
issuance costs of approximately
$57,000............................ (56,931) -- -- (56,931)
Accretion of dividends on Series B
redeemable convertible preferred
stock.............................. (219,205) -- -- (219,205)
Net loss............................. -- -- (5,726,503) (5,726,503)
------------ ----------- ------------ ------------
Balance, December 31, 1998............. 4,022,059 -- (6,728,295) (2,697,426)
Sale of Series C redeemable convertible
preferred stock, net of issuance costs
of approximately $59,900.............. (59,892) -- -- (59,892)
Compensation expense related to
employee stock option grant........... 13,750 -- -- 13,750
Exercise of Class A common stock
options............................... 25,728 -- -- 25,850
Accretion of dividends on Series B
redeemable convertible preferred
stock................................. (541,541) -- -- (541,541)
Accretion of dividends on Series C
redeemable convertible preferred
stock................................. (478,825) -- -- (478,825)
Deferred compensation related to stock
options............................... 2,384,340 (2,384,340) -- --
Amortization of deferred
compensation.......................... -- 183,793 -- 183,793
Conversion of preferred stock and Class
B common stock to Class A common
stock................................. 35,586,934 -- -- 35,601,740
Conversion of Class A common stock to
common stock.......................... -- -- -- --
Reclassification of dividends on Series
B and Series C redeemable convertible
preferred stock....................... 1,239,571 -- -- 1,239,571
Exercise of common stock options....... 2,726 -- -- 2,810
Sale of common stock under initial
public offering, net of issuance costs
of approximately $10,420,000.......... 114,692,597 -- -- 114,700,417
Net loss............................... -- -- (21,086,515) (21,086,515)
------------ ----------- ------------ ------------
Balance, December 31, 1999............. 156,887,447 (2,200,547) (27,814,810) 126,903,732
Sale of common stock under secondary
public offering, net of issuance costs
of approximately $949,000............. 140,336,040 -- -- 140,338,067
Exercise of common stock options and
warrants.............................. 676,987 -- -- 677,513
Sale of common stock related to
employee stock purchase plan.......... 320,050 -- -- 320,058
Amortization of deferred
compensation.......................... -- 596,085 -- 596,085
Compensation expense related to
acceleration of option vesting........ 352,318 -- -- 352,318
Net loss............................... -- -- (62,291,588) (62,291,588)
------------ ----------- ------------ ------------
Balance, December 31, 2000............. $298,572,842 $(1,604,462) $(90,106,398) $206,896,185
============ =========== ============ ============
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
47
IBASIS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------------- ------------ -----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss.................................................. $ (62,291,588) $(21,086,515) $(5,726,503)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities--
Depreciation and amortization........................... 15,717,929 2,997,355 363,821
(Gain) Loss on disposal of property and equipment....... -- (15,297) 531,129
Amortization of deferred debt financing costs........... 816,349 -- --
Noncash compensation expense related to stock options... 352,318 13,750 --
Amortization of deferred compensation................... 596,085 183,793 --
Minority interest....................................... -- (49,000) 49,000
Changes in current assets and liabilities--
Accounts receivable................................... (11,938,956) (4,319,715) (1,054,803)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets............. (4,918,885) (719,031) (172,262)
Accounts payable...................................... 2,967,471 2,359,962 3,501,268
Accrued expenses...................................... 10,463,730 3,907,757 379,563
------------- ------------ -----------
Net cash used in operating activities............... (48,235,547) (16,726,941) (2,128,787)
------------- ------------ -----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Due from PriceInteractive................................. (10,000,000) -- --
Increase in current marketable securities................. (77,146,773) -- --
Increase in long-term marketable securities............... (15,000,000) -- --
Increase in long-term investment in non-marketable
security................................................ (5,000,000) -- --
Purchases of property and equipment....................... (32,378,531) (5,245,055) (3,522,070)
Increase in other assets.................................. (3,988,649) (726,068) (249,960)
------------- ------------ -----------
Net cash used in investing activities............... (143,513,953) (5,971,123) (3,772,030)
------------- ------------ -----------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net proceeds from issuance of Series A convertible
preferred stock......................................... -- -- 1,334,251
Net proceeds from issuance of Series B redeemable
convertible preferred stock............................. -- -- 10,443,069
Net proceeds from issuance of Series C redeemable
convertible preferred stock............................. -- 25,041,848 --
Net proceeds from initial public offering................. -- 114,700,417 --
Net proceeds from secondary public offering............... 140,338,067 -- --
Net proceeds from issuance of convertible subordinated
notes................................................... 144,826,943 -- --
Proceeds from exercise of warrants and common stock
options................................................. 677,513 28,660 --
Proceeds from issuance of shares related to employee stock
purchase plan........................................... 320,058 -- --
Payments on capital lease obligations..................... (9,898,417) (806,351) (166,045)
------------- ------------ -----------
Net cash provided by financing activities............. 276,264,164 138,964,574 11,611,275
------------- ------------ -----------
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents................... 84,514,664 116,266,510 5,710,458
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year................ 123,665,961 7,399,451 1,688,993
------------- ------------ -----------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year...................... $ 208,180,625 $123,665,961 $ 7,399,451
============= ============ ===========
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for interest................ $ 9,211,824 $ 599,878 $ 55,274
============= ============ ===========
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing
activities:
Equipment acquired under capital lease obligations.... $ 60,822,136 $ 16,404,132 $ 439,270
============= ============ ===========
Accretion of dividends on Series B redeemable
convertible preferred stock......................... $ -- $ 541,541 $ 219,205
============= ============ ===========
Accretion of dividends on Series C redeemable
convertible preferred stock......................... $ -- $ 478,825 $ --
============= ============ ===========
Conversion of preferred stock and Class B common stock
to Class A common stock and subsequent conversion of
Class A common stock to common stock................ $ -- $ 35,601,740 $ --
============= ============ ===========
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
48
IBASIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
iBasis, Inc. (the Company) is a facilities-based international
telecommunications carrier that utilizes the Internet to provide economical
international telecommunications services to carriers and telephony resellers
around the world. The Company has incorporated subsidiaries around the world in
order to enhance its global operations. In addition, the Company established a
Massachusetts corporation, iBasis Securities Corporation, to implement the
Company's cash management strategy. The Company currently operates through
various service agreements with local service providers in the United States,
Europe, Asia, the Middle East, Latin America, Africa and Australia.
In November 1999, the Company completed its initial public offering and issued
7,820,000 shares of $0.001 par value Common Stock, which resulted in total net
proceeds to the Company of $114.7 million.
On March 15, 2000, the Company completed its secondary offering of common stock
and issued 2,026,637 shares of Common Stock. The offering resulted in net
proceeds to the Company of $140.3 million. The Company also sold $150.0 million
of 5 3/4% convertible subordinated notes due 2005, for net proceeds of
approximately $144.8 million.
In December 2000, the Company entered into a merger agreement with
PriceInteractive, Inc. (PriceInteractive) whereby the Company will issue
approximately 10.2 million shares of the Company's Common Stock and
approximately $46.0 million in cash to acquire all outstanding shares and vested
options of PriceInteractive. The merger agreement is subject to shareholder
approval (see Note 10).
The Company is subject to a number of risks common to companies in similar
stages of development, including dependence on key individuals and key vendors,
the need for adequate financing to fund future operations, the continued
successful development and marketing of its services and the attainment of
profitable operations.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the application of
certain significant accounting policies as described in this note and elsewhere
in these notes to consolidated financial statements.
(a) PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
iBasis, Inc., all of its global operating subsidiaries and iBasis Securities
Corporation. All significant intercompany balances have been eliminated in
consolidation.
(b) USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
(c) REVENUE RECOGNITION
In early 1998, the Company commenced the resale of international minutes of
calling time for calls resold through the Company's gateways. Revenue from the
resale of minutes is recognized in the period the service is provided, net of
reserves for potential billing credits. In addition, the Company also generates
revenue from the resale of certain equipment, which is recognized upon shipment
of the
49
IBASIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(1) OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
equipment. The resale of equipment was not a material component of the Company's
revenue during all years presented.
In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released Staff
Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, REVENUE RECOGNITION IN FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
SAB No. 101 summarizes some views of the SEC on applying accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States to revenue recognition in financial
statements. The SEC believes that revenue is realized or realizable and earned
when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the
seller's price to the buyer is fixed or determinable and collectibility is
reasonably assured. The Company believes that its current revenue recognition
policy complies with the SEC guidelines.
(d) NET LOSS PER SHARE
Basic and diluted net loss per common share were determined by dividing net loss
by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. Basic net
loss per share and diluted net loss per share are the same as the outstanding
common stock options, common stock warrants, convertible preferred stock,
convertible debentures and Class B common stock are antidilutive as the Company
has recorded a net loss for all periods presented. Options and warrants to
purchase a weighted average total of 310,404 of Class A common shares have been
excluded from the computation of diluted weighted average common shares
outstanding for the year ended December 31, 1998. Options and warrants to
purchase a weighted average total of 1,209,614 and 1,973,282 common shares have
been excluded from the computation of diluted weighted average common shares
outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Additionally, 1,741,351 common shares related to the conversion of the
convertible debentures have been excluded from the computation of diluted
weighted average common shares outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2000.
The following table reconciles the weighted average common shares outstanding to
the shares used in the computation of basic and diluted weighted average common
shares outstanding:
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------- --------- ---------
Weighted average common shares outstanding................. 33,626,517 9,681,482 6,060,000
Less--Weighted average unvested common shares
outstanding.............................................. 14,979 26,229 37,449
---------- --------- ---------
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares
outstanding.............................................. 33,611,538 9,655,253 6,022,551
========== ========= =========
(e) CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
The Company considers highly liquid investments purchased with an original
maturity of 90 days or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. At
December 31, 2000 and 1999, cash equivalents included money market accounts and
commercial paper that are readily convertible into cash. Under Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115, ACCOUNTING FOR CERTAIN
INVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES, the Company classifies its
investments as held-to-maturity, and therefore has recorded them at amortized
cost which approximates market value in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
50
IBASIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(1) OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
(f) PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Construction in process represents those assets that have been acquired by the
Company, but were not in service as of the balance sheet date. For assets that
have been placed in service, the Company provides for depreciation and
amortization using the straight-line method over the useful life of the asset,
as follows:
ESTIMATED
ASSET CLASSIFICATION USEFUL LIFE
- -------------------- -------------
Network equipment........................................... 3 years
Equipment under capital lease............................... Life of lease
Leasehold improvements...................................... Life of lease
Computer software........................................... 3 years
Furniture and fixtures...................................... 5 years
(g) DEFERRED DEBT FINANCING COSTS
In March of 2000, the Company sold $150.0 million of 5 3/4% convertible
subordinated notes due 2005. Underwriter discounts of $4.5 million and other
costs of approximately $700,000 incurred in connection with the sale are being
amortized to interest expense using the straight line method over five years,
the term of the convertible subordinated notes.
(h) LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS IN MARKETABLE AND NONMARKETABLE SECURITIES
Investments in marketable securities that have maturity dates after
December 31, 2001 are classified as long-term investments. At December 31, 2000,
long-term investments in marketable securities consist of corporate bonds and
commercial paper that are readily convertible into cash. Under SFAS No. 115, the
Company classifies its investments as held-to-maturity and, therefore, has
recorded them at amortized cost in the accompanying balance sheet.
The Company's investments in held-to-maturity securities as of December 31, 2000
are as follows:
UNREALIZED MARKET
AMORTIZED COST GAIN (LOSS) VALUE MATURITY
-------------- ----------- ----------- --------------
Government Securities.... $25,980,865 $58,068 $26,038,933 within 1 year
Government Securities.... 15,000,000 2,746 15,002,746 within 2 years
Government Paper......... 34,685,083 (2,625) 34,682,458 within 1 year
Government Bonds......... 16,480,825 20,612 16,501,437 within 1 year
----------- -------- -----------
$92,146,773 $78,801 $92,225,574
=========== ======== ===========
The Company had no investments in held-to-maturity securities as of
December 31, 1999.
The long-term investment in nonmarketable security represents an equity
investment in a privately held telecommunications company that is not readily
convertible into cash. The investment has been recorded at cost in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet. There has been no permanent impairment
in value as of December 31, 2000.
51
IBASIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(1) OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
(i) OTHER ASSETS
Other assets at December 31, 2000 and 1999 consists primarily of deposits.
(j) RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES
The Company charges research and development expenses to operations as incurred.
(k) CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK/SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS
SFAS No. 105, DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ABOUT FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH
OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT
RISK, requires disclosure of any significant off-balance-sheet and credit risk
concentrations. The Company has no significant off-balance-sheet concentrations
such as foreign exchange contracts, option contracts or other foreign hedging
arrangements. The Company maintains the majority of its cash and cash equivalent
balances with three financial institutions. Two customers represented
approximately 32% of total accounts receivable at December 31, 1999. No single
customer accounted for greater than 10% of accounts receivable at December 31,
2000. The following table represents customers that account for more than 10% of
net revenue in any of the years reported:
YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Customer A.................................................. 3% 12% 7%
Customer B.................................................. 2% 7% 18%
Customer C.................................................. -- -- 15%
Customer D.................................................. -- 2% 11%
Customer E.................................................. 7% 10% --
(l) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, long-term investments in marketable and long-term investments in
nonmarketable securities, convertible debentures and accounts payable. The
estimated fair value of these instruments approximates their carrying value.
(m) STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
SFAS No. 123, ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION, requires the measurement
of the fair value of stock options or warrants to be included in the
consolidated statements of operations or disclosed in the notes to consolidated
financial statements. The Company has determined that it will account for
stock-based compensation for employees under the intrinsic value-based method of
the Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK
ISSUED TO EMPLOYEES, and elect the disclosure-only alternative under SFAS No.
123. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation for nonemployees under
the fair value method prescribed by SFAS No. 123. To date there have been no
material grants to nonemployees.
52
IBASIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(1) OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
(n) COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No.
130, REPORTING COMPREHENSIVE INCOME. The Company does not have any components of
comprehensive income (loss) other than its reported net loss.
(o) LONG-LIVED ASSETS
The Company's long-lived assets consist primarily of property and equipment. In
accordance with SFAS No. 121, ACCOUNTING FOR THE IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
AND FOR LONG-LIVED ASSETS TO BE DISPOSED OF, the Company has assessed the
realizability of these assets and has determined that there were no asset
impairments as of December 31, 2000.
(p) DERIVATIVES
SFAS No. 133, ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES, establishes
accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain
derivative instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively, derivatives)
and for hedging activities. SFAS No. 133, as amended by SFAS No. 137 and SFAS
No. 138, is effective for all fiscal quarters of fiscal years beginning after
June 15, 2000. As the Company does not currently engage in derivatives or
hedging transactions, there will be no impact to the Company's results of
operations, financial position or cash flows upon the adoption of SFAS No. 133.
(q) RECENT ACCOUNTING ANNOUNCEMENTS
In March 2000, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 44, ACCOUNTING FOR CERTAIN
TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING STOCK COMPENSATION--AN INTERPRETATION OF APB OPINION
NO. 25. This interpretation provides guidance on the application of APB Opinion
No. 25, including (i) the definition of an employee, (ii) the criteria for
determining whether a plan qualifies as a noncompensatory plan, (iii) the
accounting consequence of various modifications to the terms of a previously
fixed stock option or award and (iv) the accounting for an exchange of stock
compensation awards in a business combination. This interpretation is effective
July 1, 2000 and the effects of applying the interpretation are recognized on a
prospective basis. The adoption of this interpretation did not have a material
impact on the Company's results of operations or financial condition.
In September 2000, the FASB issued SFAS No. 140, ACCOUNTING FOR TRANSFERS AND
SERVICING OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND EXTINGUISHMENTS OF LIABILITIES, a replacement
of SFAS No. 125. This statement provides accounting and reporting standards for
transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities.
The statement provides consistent standards for distinguishing transfers of
financial assets that are sales from transfers that are secured borrowings. The
statement is effective for transfers and servicing of financial assets and
extinguishments of liabilities occurring after March 31, 2001. The statement is
effective for recognition and reclassification of collateral and for disclosures
relating to securitization transactions and collateral for fiscal years ending
after December 15, 2000. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS
No. 140 to have a material impact on the results of its operations or financial
position.
(r) RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 1998 and 1999 consolidated
financial statements to conform to the 2000 presentation.
53
IBASIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(2) ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued expenses at December 31, 2000 and 1999 consisted of the following:
2000 1999
----------- ----------
Accrued interest on convertible subordinated notes
(Note 4(a))....................................... $ 2,527,218 $ --
Accrued termination fees............................ 4,792,661 59,671
Accrued other....................................... 7,535,147 4,331,625
----------- ----------
$14,855,026 $4,391,296
=========== ==========
(3) INCOME TAXES
The Company provides for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
ACCOUNTING FOR INCOME TAXES. Under SFAS No. 109, deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized based on temporary differences between the financial
statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using currently enacted tax
rates.
No provision for federal or state income taxes has been recorded, as the Company
incurred net operating losses for all periods presented. As of December 31,
2000, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately
$73,835,000 available to reduce future federal and state income taxes, if any.
If not utilized, these carryforwards expire at various dates through 2020. If
substantial changes in the Company's ownership should occur, as defined by
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code), there could be annual
limitations on the amount of carryforwards which can be realized in future
periods. The Company has completed several financings since its inception and
believes that it may have incurred an ownership change as defined under the
Code.
The approximate income tax effects of each type of temporary difference and
carryforward are as follows:
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------
2000 1999
------------ ------------
Net operating loss carryforwards................. $ 29,534,000 $ 10,263,000
Other temporary differences...................... 1,514,000 578,000
Valuation allowance.............................. (31,048,000) (10,841,000)
------------ ------------
$ -- $ --
============ ============
The Company has recorded a 100% valuation allowance against the net deferred tax
asset as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, because the future realizability of such
asset is uncertain. The increase in the valuation allowance during these years
primarily relates to the tax effects of the Company's net losses recorded in
each year.
54
IBASIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(4) LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following as of December 31:
2000 1999
------------ -----------
Convertible subordinated notes.................... $150,000,000 $ --
Capital lease obligations......................... 66,986,099 16,065,123
------------ -----------
216,986,099 16,065,123
Less--Current portion............................. 26,105,842 4,376,280
------------ -----------
$190,880,257 $11,688,843
============ ===========
(a) CONVERTIBLE SUBORDINATED NOTES
In March of 2000, the Company sold $150.0 million of Convertible Subordinated
Notes (the Notes) resulting in net proceeds to the Company of approximately
$144.8 million. The Notes bear interest at 5 3/4% with interest payable on each
March 15 and September 15, beginning September 15, 2000. The Notes mature
March 15, 2005 and are subordinated to the Company's capital lease obligations.
CONVERSION
The notes are convertible at any time prior to maturity into common stock at a
conversion price of $86.14 per share, subject to adjustment upon certain events
as defined in the note agreement.
PROVISIONAL REDEMPTION
The Company may redeem some or all of the notes at any time prior to March 20,
2003 if the price of the Company's common stock has exceeded 150% of the
conversion price for at least 20 out of 30 consecutive trading days prior to
redemption. If some or all of the notes are redeemed prior to March 20, 2003,
the Company is required to make an additional payment on the redeemed notes
equal to $152.54 per $1,000 note, less the amount of interest actually paid on
the note.
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
The Company may redeem some or all of the notes after March 20, 2003 at the
following redemption prices for the 12-month periods beginning March 20, 2003,
expressed as a percentage of principal amount: 102.3%, 101.15% and 100%,
respectively. In each case, the Company will also pay accrued but unpaid
interest up to, but excluding the redemption date.
REPURCHASE AT HOLDER'S OPTION
Upon a repurchase event, as defined in the Notes, the holder can require the
Company to repurchase the Notes in cash, or at the Company's option upon
satisfaction of certain conditions, in common stock, at 105% of the principal
amount of the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
(b) CAPITAL LEASES
The Company has entered into an agreement with Cisco Systems Capital Corporation
(the Leasing Agreement) under which the Company is able to finance up to
$90,000,000 of equipment purchases. Each outstanding lease, under the Leasing
Agreement, bears interest at an annual rate between 6.7% and 13.9% and has a
36-month term. As of December 31, 2000, the Company had approximately
$42,000,000 available under the leasing agreement.
55
IBASIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(4) LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED)
The Company has also entered into other capital leases with other vendors.
(c) LINE OF CREDIT
On June 18, 1999, the Company entered into a loan and security agreement (the
Agreement) with a bank which provides for a revolving line of credit (the
Revolver) and an equipment line of credit (the Equipment Line).
The Revolver, which allowed the Company to borrow up to $1,500,000, was renewed
for one year in June 2000 with a maximum borrowing amount of $2,500,000.
Borrowings under the Revolver, collateralized by substantially all assets of the
Company, are payable at maturity and bear interest at the bank's prime rate
(8.5% at December 31, 2000) plus 1% per annum. The Agreement requires the
Company to maintain certain financial covenants including a minimum quick ratio,
and maximum quarterly net loss requirement, as defined. The Company was in
compliance with these covenants at December 31, 2000. The Agreement also
prohibits the payment of dividends. At December 31, 2000 and 1999, there were no
borrowings under the Revolver. However, the Company had $678,711 of letters of
credit outstanding against the Revolver.
The Company borrowed $505,634 under the Equipment Line during 1999 for purposes
of equipment purchases. Borrowings under the Equipment Line bear interest at the
bank's prime rate (8.5% at December 31, 2000) plus 1.5% and are payable in 36
equal monthly installments of principal and interest through August 2002. The
amounts under this facility have been included in Capital lease obligations in
the table above as of December 31, 2000 and 1999.
(d) REPAYMENTS OF DEBT
Scheduled maturities of long-term debt as of December 31, 2000 are as follows:
CONVERTIBLE
CAPITAL SUBORDINATED
YEAR LEASES NOTES TOTAL
---- ----------- ------------ ------------
2001................................ $36,022,866 $ -- $ 36,022,866
2002................................ 29,664,047 -- 29,664,047
2003................................ 13,895,241 -- 13,895,241
2004................................ -- -- --
2005................................ -- 150,000,000 150,000,000
----------- ------------ ------------
Total future minimum payments....... 79,582,154 150,000,000 229,582,154
Less: Amounts representing
interest............................ 12,596,055 -- 12,596,055
----------- ------------ ------------
Present value of minimum
repayments.......................... 66,986,099 150,000,000 216,986,099
Less: Current portion of long-term
debt................................ 26,105,842 -- 26,105,842
----------- ------------ ------------
Long-term debt, net of current
portion............................. $40,880,257 $150,000,000 $190,880,257
=========== ============ ============
(5) REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
In August 1998, the Company sold 6,562,500 shares of Series B redeemable
convertible preferred stock (Series B) for aggregate proceeds of $10,500,000. On
July 12, 1999, the Company sold 5,744,103 shares of Series C redeemable
convertible preferred stock (Series C) for aggregate proceeds of $25,101,740.
56
IBASIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(5) REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK (CONTINUED)
The rights, preferences and privileges of the Series B and Series C were as
follows:
VOTING
The holders of Series B and Series C were entitled to the number of votes equal
to the number of common shares into which the preferred shares were convertible.
The preferred shareholders voted together with the holders of common stock as a
single class, except where a separate class vote was otherwise required by
applicable law or the Certificate of Incorporation or bylaws.
DIVIDENDS
The holders of Series B and Series C were entitled to receive dividends, when
and if declared by the Board of Directors, and in preference and prior to any
dividend declared or paid on any shares of common stock in preference to the
holders of common stock. The Board of Directors never declared dividends on
shares of Series B or Series C.
LIQUIDATION PREFERENCE
In the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up of the Company, the holders of Series B and Series C were entitled to
be paid out of the assets available for distribution an amount equal to the
greater of $1.60 and $4.37 per share, respectively, plus any declared but unpaid
dividends or the amount that would be distributed to each preferred stockholder
if all shares of Series B and Series C were converted to Class A common stock
shares. If the assets of the Company were insufficient to pay the full
preferential amounts to the preferred stockholders, the assets were to be
distributed ratably among the outstanding shares of Series B and Series C in
proportion to its aggregate liquidation preference amounts.
REDEMPTION
At any time on or after August 26, 2003, upon receipt of written request for
redemption from holders of at least 60% of the shares of Series B or Series C
then outstanding, the Company was to redeem all of the outstanding shares of
Series B and Series C in three equal annual installments at a redemption price
of $1.60 and $4.37 per share, respectively, plus any declared but unpaid
dividends. For the purpose of redemption, the Series B and Series C would have
had an annual 6% accrued dividend. As of the closing of the initial public
offering, cumulative dividends on Series B and Series C totaled $1,239,571.
These dividends are not included for purposes of conversion. Upon the initial
public offering the Series B and Series C converted into Class A common stock
and, therefore, these dividends were reclassified to additional paid-in capital
in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1999.
CONVERSION
Upon the closing of the Company's initial public offering, all of the
outstanding shares of Series B and Series C automatically converted into
6,562,500 and 5,744,103 shares of Class A common shares, respectively.
57
IBASIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(6) STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(a) AUTHORIZED CAPITAL STOCK
Effective July 12, 1999, the authorized capital stock of the Company increased
to 45,406,875, consisting of 31,500,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value
per share, of which 30,000,000 and 1,500,000 shares were designated Class A
common stock (Class A) and Class B common stock (Class B), respectively, and
13,906,875 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share, of which
1,256,875 shares were designated Series A convertible preferred stock
(Series A), 6,875,000 shares were designated Series B and 5,775,000 shares were
designated Series C.
In connection with the Company's initial public offering, 85,000,000 shares of
common stock, $0.001 par value per share (Common Stock) and 15,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share (Preferred Stock) were authorized.
Upon the completion of the initial public offering, all outstanding shares of
preferred stock, as well as Class B common stock, were converted into the
following number of shares of Class A common stock:
NUMBER OF SHARES OF
CLASS A COMMON STOCK
--------------------
Series A preferred stock................................. 3,750,000
Series B preferred stock................................. 6,562,500
Series C preferred stock................................. 5,744,103
Class B common stock..................................... 1,500,000
Subsequently, all outstanding shares of Class A common stock were converted into
23,738,353 shares of $0.001 par value Common Stock.
(b) SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
During 1997 and 1998, the Company sold an aggregate of 1,250,000 shares of
Series A for aggregate proceeds of $3,750,000.
The rights, preferences and privileges of the Series A were as follows:
VOTING
The holders of Series A were entitled to the number of votes equal to the number
of common shares into which the preferred shares were convertible. The preferred
shareholders voted together with the holders of common stock as a single class,
except where a separate class vote was otherwise required by applicable law or
the Certificate of Incorporation or bylaws.
DIVIDENDS
The holders of Series A were entitled to receive dividends, when and if declared
by the Board of Directors, and in preference and prior to any dividend declared
or paid on any shares of common stock in preference to the holders of common
stock. The Board of Directors never declared dividends on shares of Series A.
LIQUIDATION PREFERENCE
In the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up of the Company, the holders of Series A were entitled to be paid out
of the assets available for distribution an amount equal to the greater of $3.00
per share plus any declared but unpaid dividends or the amount that would have
been distributed to each preferred stockholder if all shares of Series A were
converted to Class A
58
IBASIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(6) STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (CONTINUED)
common shares. If the assets of the Company were insufficient to pay the full
preferential amounts to the preferred stockholders, the assets were to be
distributed ratably among the outstanding shares of, first, Series B, and
second, Series A, in proportion to their aggregate liquidation preference
amounts.
CONVERSION
In connection with the initial public offering, each outstanding share of
Series A was converted into three shares of common stock.
(c) COMMON STOCK
The rights, preferences and privileges of the Class A and Class B were as
follows:
VOTING
The holders of Class A and Class B voted for each share of stock owned. The
common shareholders voted as a single class, together with the holders of
Series A and Series B, except where a separate class vote was otherwise required
by applicable law or the Certificate of Incorporation or bylaws.
DIVIDENDS
Holders of Class B were entitled to dividends, when and if declared by the Board
of Directors, equal to an aggregate of $.33 per share (the Priority Dividend)
prior to any dividends being declared or paid to holders of Class A, subject to
the preferential dividend rights of holders of the Series A and B preferred
stock. Class A was not entitled to any priority dividend. After the Priority
Dividend has been paid, holders of Class A and Class B were entitled to receive
equal dividends, when and if declared by the Board of Directors. Dividends were
never declared on shares of Class A or Class B.
LIQUIDATION PREFERENCE
In the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up of the Company, and subject to the preferential rights of the holders
of Series A and B, the holders of Class B had a liquidation preference over the
holders of Class A of $0.33 per share less any Priority Dividend previously
paid. The holders of Class A were then entitled to a distribution amount of
$0.33 per share. Any remaining assets of the Company were to be distributed
ratably among the holders of Class A and Class B. If assets of the Company were
insufficient to pay the full amount to the common stockholders, the assets were
to be distributed ratably among the common stockholders in proportion to, and in
order of their rights to, their aggregate liquidation amounts.
CONVERSION
Upon the completion of the Company's initial public offering, all 6,060,000
shares of Class A common stock and all 1,500,000 shares of Class B common stock
were converted into 6,060,000 and 1,500,000 shares of common stock,
respectively.
RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD
In connection with a restricted stock award, the Company signed an agreement
with one of its employees stipulating that if the shareholder's employment with
the Company terminates, the Company will have the right to repurchase any
unvested shares for $0.0333 per share, which was the fair value of
59
IBASIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(6) STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (CONTINUED)
the stock on the date of grant. The shares vest at a rate of 25% per year. At
December 31, 2000, there were 11,250 unvested shares under this agreement.
(d) STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
The Company's 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan) provides for the granting of
restricted stock awards and incentive stock options (ISOs) and nonqualified
options to purchase up to 5,700,000 shares of Common Stock to key employees,
directors and consultants. Under terms of the Plan, the exercise price of
options granted shall be determined by the Board of Directors and for ISOs shall
not be less than fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. Options
vest quarterly in 16 equal installments, provided that no options shall vest
during the optionee's first year of employment. The term of each stock option
shall be determined by the Board of Directors, but shall not exceed 10 years
from the date of grant.
The following table summarizes the option activity for the years ended
December 31, 1998, 1999 and 2000:
WEIGHTED
EXERCISE AVERAGE
NUMBER OF PRICE PER EXERCISE
SHARES SHARE PRICE
--------- ----------- --------
Outstanding, December 31, 1997.............. 342,300 $ 0.03 $0.03
Granted................................... 1,186,600 0.50-1.10 0.70
Terminated................................ (200,000) 0.50 0.50
--------- ----------- -----
Outstanding, December 31, 1998.............. 1,328,900 0.03-1.10 0.56
Granted................................... 2,028,600 1.00-37.94 6.13
Exercised................................. (206,125) 0.03-0.50 0.14
Terminated................................ (203,650) 0.50-37.94 1.27
--------- ----------- -----
Outstanding, December 31, 1999.............. 2,947,725 0.03-37.94 4.37
Granted................................... 2,175,000 4.13-74.63 12.91
Exercised................................. (511,702) 0.03-13.50 1.30
Terminated................................ (371,940) 0.50-74.63 7.95
--------- ----------- -----
Outstanding, December 31, 2000.............. 4,239,083 $0.03-74.63 $8.76
========= =========== =====
Exercisable, December 31, 2000.............. 854,528 $0.03-37.94 $4.88
========= =========== =====
60
IBASIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(6) STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (CONTINUED)
The following table summarizes information relating to currently outstanding and
exercisable stock options as of December 31, 2000:
OUTSTANDING EXERCISABLE
------------------------------------ ----------------------
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
REMAINING WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
RANGE OF CONTRACTUAL AVERAGE AVERAGE
EXERCISE OPTIONS LIFE EXERCISE OPTIONS EXERCISE
PRICES OUTSTANDING (IN YEARS) PRICE OUTSTANDING PRICE
- ------------------- ----------- ----------- -------- ----------- --------
$ 0.03 39,000 6.61 $ 0.03 2,943 $ 0.03
0.50-0.65 287,088 7.60 0.55 152,786 0.54
1.00-1.50 506,620 8.50 1.16 213,638 1.13
4.00-5.00 1,298,364 9.03 4.36 286,892 4.39
11.00-14.85 2,027,411 9.38 13.37 186,944 11.90
28.75-37.94 51,300 8.98 31.62 11,325 31.64
46.13 6,000 9.05 46.13 -- --
71.00-74.63 23,300 9.07 73.07 -- --
--------- -------
4,239,083 854,528
========= =======
At December 31, 2000, options to purchase 743,090 common shares were available
for future grants under the Plan.
The Company applies the accounting provisions prescribed in APB No. 25 and
related interpretations. During September 1999, the Company issued stock options
with an exercise price less than the fair market value of the common stock as
determined for accounting purposes. Accordingly, total deferred compensation
related to these stock options of approximately $2,384,000 was recorded during
the year ended December 31, 1999 and is being amortized over four years, the
vesting period of the options. Amortization of deferred compensation of
approximately $596,000 and $184,000 has been recognized as an expense in the
year ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Prior to September 1999,
the Company had not issued stock options with an exercise price less than the
fair market value. During 2000, the Company accelerated vesting on 118,750
options to purchase common stock in relation to a severance agreement with an
employee. Accordingly, the Company recorded non-cash compensation expense of
approximately $352,000 which is included in general and administrative expenses
in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
(e) EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
On September 9, 1999, the Company's board of directors and stockholders approved
the 1999 iBasis, Inc. employee stock purchase plan (the Purchase Plan), which
enables eligible employees to acquire shares of the Company's common stock
through payroll deductions. The Purchase Plan is intended to qualify as an
employee stock purchase plan under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. The
offering periods under the Purchase Plan start on January 1 and July 1 of each
year and end on June 30 and December 31 of each year, unless otherwise
determined by the board of directors. During each offering period, an eligible
employee may select a rate of payroll deduction from 1% to 10% of compensation,
up to an aggregate of $12,500 in any offering period. The purchase price for
common stock purchased under the Purchase Plan is 85% of the lesser of the fair
market value of the shares on the first or last day of the offering period. An
aggregate of 500,000 shares of common stock have been
61
IBASIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(6) STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (CONTINUED)
reserved for issuance under the Purchase Plan. In July 2000, the Company issued
7,759 shares under the Purchase Plan.
(f) PREFERRED STOCK WARRANTS
During 1997 and 1998, the Company issued 58,125 warrants to purchase its common
stock. During 2000, 14,257 of these options with an exercise price of $1.00 were
exercised. As of December 31, 2000, 43,868 warrants with exercise prices of
$1.00 were outstanding and exercisable.
(g) STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
SFAS No. 123, ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION, which requires the
measurement of the fair value of stock options or warrants to be included in the
consolidated statements of operations or disclosed in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements. The Company has determined that it will
continue to account for stock-based compensation for employees under the APB
Opinion No. 25 and elect the disclosure-only alternative under SFAS No. 123 for
options granted in 2000, 1999, and 1998, using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model prescribed by SFAS No. 123.
The weighted average assumptions and resulting fair value of options granted are
as follows:
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------- ------------- ------------
Risk-free interest rate...................... 6.19% 5.77% 4.99%
Expected dividend yield...................... -- -- --
Expected lives............................... 5 years 5 years 5 years
Volatility................................... 146% 61% 60%
Weighted average remaining contractual
life....................................... 8.96 years 9.20 years 9.49 years
Weighted average fair value of options
granted.................................... $11.76 $4.90 $0.39
Had compensation expense from the Company's stock incentive plan been determined
consistent with SFAS No. 123, net loss and net loss per share would have been
approximately as follows:
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------------ ------------ -----------
Net loss applicable to common
stockholders--
As reported........................ $(62,291,588) $(22,106,881) $(5,945,708)
Pro forma.......................... (69,655,809) (22,667,437) (5,979,305)
Basic and diluted net loss per
share--
As reported........................ $ (1.85) $ (2.29) $ (0.99)
Pro forma.......................... (2.07) (2.35) (0.99)
62
IBASIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(7) COMMITMENTS
The Company leases its facilities and certain equipment under operating leases
that expire through 2009. The approximate future minimum payments under these
leases as of December 31, 2000 are as follows:
MINIMUM
YEAR PAYMENT
- ---- -----------
2001........................................................ $ 4,706,000
2002........................................................ 4,496,000
2003........................................................ 2,409,000
2004........................................................ 1,752,000
2005........................................................ 1,299,000
Thereafter.................................................. 4,257,000
-----------
Total future minimum lease payments......................... $18,919,000
===========
Rent expense included in the consolidated statements of operations was
approximately $3,742,000, $640,000, $69,000 for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
(8) SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
The Company has adopted SFAS No. 131, DISCLOSURES ABOUT SEGMENTS OF AN
ENTERPRISE AND RELATED INFORMATION, which establishes standards for reporting
information regarding operating segments in annual financial statements and
requires selected information for those segments to be presented in interim
financial reports issued to stockholders. SFAS No. 131 also establishes
standards for related disclosures about products and services and geographic
areas. Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about
which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the
chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to
allocate resources and assess performance. The Company's chief decision-maker,
as defined under SFAS No. 131, is a combination of the Chief Executive Officer
and the Chief Financial Officer. To date, the Company has viewed its operations
and manages its business as principally one segment, international
telecommunication services. Associated services are not significant. As a
result, the financial information disclosed herein represents all of the
material financial information related to the Company's principal operating
segment.
The following table represents percentage revenue from individual countries:
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
US.................................................... 97% 95% 86%
Hong Kong............................................. 2 -- --
Other................................................. 1 5 14
---- ---- ----
100% 100% 100%
---- ---- ----
63
IBASIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(8) SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
The following table represents percentage of minute revenue for traffic sent to
the specified geographic destinations:
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Asia.................................................. 41% 49% 56%
Latin America......................................... 23 22 14
Europe................................................ 18 7 --
Middle East........................................... 14 18 14
United States......................................... 2 1 12
Other................................................. 2 3 4
---- ---- ----
100% 100% 100%
---- ---- ----
(9) RELATED PARTY
For the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, the Company paid approximately
$289,000 and $415,000, respectively, to a related party, Microworld Limited for
services rendered. These fees paid to this related party are included in data
communications and telecommunications costs in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
(10) MERGER AGREEMENT
During December 2000, iBasis, Inc. and PriceInteractive, Inc. entered into a
merger agreement pursuant to which PriceInteractive, Inc. will be merged with
and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of iBasis. As a result of the merger, iBasis
expects to issue an aggregate of approximately 10.2 million shares of iBasis
common stock, and approximately $46.0 million in cash, to the holders of the
issued and outstanding capital stock of PriceInteractive and "vested" options to
acquire PriceInteractive common stock. The actual number of shares of iBasis
common stock issued upon the closing of the merger is subject to increase as
defined in the merger agreement. iBasis will also assume all outstanding
unvested options to purchase PriceInteractive common stock up to a maximum
number, which will become options to purchase iBasis common stock and cash in
the same ratio as the outstanding shares of PriceInteractive stock convert into
iBasis common stock and cash. The number of shares issuable upon exercise of
options to be assumed will also increase if the number of shares to be issued at
the closing of the merger increases, or if the market price of the iBasis common
stock changes. The merger will be completed in the first quarter of 2001,
subject to stockholder approval. The acquisition of PriceInteractive will be
accounted for using the purchase method of accounting.
In connection with the execution of the merger agreement, the Company loaned
$10.0 million to PriceInteractive, in the form of a convertible subordinated
promissory note. The loan has been recorded as an amount due from
PriceInteractive in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. In the event
that the merger is not consummated, the note will convert into a specified
number of shares of PriceInteractive common stock. In the event that the merger
does not close before February 28, 2001 and the merger agreement has not been
terminated, the Company will be required to make an additional loan of
$5.0 million to PriceInteractive.
In accordance with APB Opinion No. 16, the Company will allocate the purchase
price to tangible and intangible assets, based on the estimate of the fair value
of the net assets acquired to be determined by an independent appraisal. The
following allocation of the aggregate purchase price is preliminary and
64
IBASIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(10) MERGER AGREEMENT (CONTINUED)
subject to adjustment, based on the final determination of the fair value of the
stock issued by the Company and the net assets acquired. In addition, the
following does not consider any deferred income taxes which may be required for
the non-goodwill purchased intangibles as the independent appraisal is not
complete at this time.
Based upon the closing price of iBasis, Inc.'s stock of $5.03 as of
February 20, 2001, iBasis, Inc. will pay approximately $102.1 million in
aggregate consideration to acquire PriceInteractive, Inc. The total purchase
price will be allocated as follows:
(IN MILLIONS)
-------------
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short Term Investments........... $ 12.5
Other Current Assets........................................ 8.3
Property and Equipment...................................... 9.8
Goodwill and Other Purchased Intangibles.................... 71.1
Other Assets................................................ 0.1
Current Liabilities......................................... (7.7)
Long Term Debt.............................................. (13.1)
In-process Research and Development......................... 21.1
--------
Total Purchase Price........................................ $ 102.1
========
Unaudited pro forma operating results for the Company, assuming the acquisition
of PriceInteractive had occurred as of January 1, 2000 are as follows:
Net revenue................................................. $ 72,294,736
Net loss.................................................... (98,600,627)
Net loss per share.......................................... $ (2.23)
For purposes of these pro forma operating results, the acquired in-process
research and development costs were assumed to have been written off prior to
December 31, 2000.
(11) VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
The following is a rollforward of the Company's allowance for doubtful accounts:
BALANCE AT
YEAR ENDED BEGINNING OF BALANCE AT
DECEMBER 31, YEAR ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS END OF YEAR
- ------------ ------------ ---------- ---------- -----------
1998........................... $ -- $ 126,741 $ -- $ 126,741
1999........................... 126,741 510,380 (4,000) 633,121
2000........................... 633,121 1,944,560 (398,313) 2,179,368
65
PART III
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Information required by Part III, Item 10, regarding iBasis's directors may be
found in iBasis's Proxy Statement relating to iBasis's annual meeting of
stockholders to be held on May 31, 2001, and is incorporated herein by
reference. Information relating to compliance with Section 16(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, may be found in the Proxy Statement
and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information required by Part III, Item 11, may be found in iBasis's Proxy
Statement relating to iBasis's annual meeting of stockholders to be held on
May 31, 2001, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Information required by Part III, Item 12, may be found in iBasis's Proxy
Statement relating to iBasis's annual meeting of stockholders to be held on
May 31, 2001, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Information regarding certain of iBasis's relationships and related transactions
may be found in iBasis's Proxy Statement relating to iBasis's annual meeting of
stockholders to be held on May 31, 2001, and is incorporated herein by
reference.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a)LIST OF DOCUMENTS FILED AS A PART OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT:
(1) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
- Report of Independent Public Accountants
- Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1998 and 1999
- Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
1997, 1998
and 1999
- Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and
Stockholders' Equity
(Deficit) for the Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999
- Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
1997, 1998
and 1999
- Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(2) INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES:
None.
66
(3) INDEX TO EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
- --------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------
3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Registrant (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to
the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file
no. 333-96535)).
3.2 Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Registrant (incorporated
by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-96535)).
4.1 Specimen Certificate for shares of the Registrant's common
stock (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file no.
333-85545)).
10.1 Lease, dated January 8, 1999, as amended, between the
Registrant and Rodger P. Nordblum and Peter C. Nordblum as
Trustees of Northwest Associates under Declaration of Trust
dated December 9, 1971 with respect to property located at
20 Second Avenue, Burlington, Massachusetts (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-85545)).
10.2 Standard Form Commercial Lease, dated as of February 26,
1997, between the Registrant and Technology Properties
Associates, with respect to property located at 121
Middlesex Turnpike, Burlington, Massachusetts (incorporated
by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-85545)).
10.3 Lease, dated as of August 7, 1998, between the Registrant
and 111 Eighth Avenue LLC, relating to property located at
111 Eighth Avenue, New York, New York (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-85545)).
10.4 Lease, dated December 11, 1998 between the Registrant and
Downtown Properties L.L.C., with respect to property located
at 611 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file no.
333-85545)).
10.5 Warrant, dated as of September 10, 1997, for the purchase of
shares of preferred stock of the Company issued to TLP
Leasing Programs, Inc. (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (file no. 333-85545)).
10.6 Warrant, dated as of June 8, 1998, for the purchase of
shares of preferred stock of the Company issued to TLP
Leasing Programs, Inc. (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (file no. 333-85545)).
10.7 Master Agreement of Terms and Conditions for Lease between
the Registrant and Cisco Systems Capital Corporation, dated
as of November 3, 1998, as amended (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-85545)).
10.8+ 1997 Stock Incentive Plan of the Registrant (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-85545)).
10.9+ Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Ofer Gneezy,
dated as of August 11, 1997 (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (file no. 333-85545)).
67
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
- --------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------
10.10+ Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Gordon J.
VanderBrug, dated as of August 11, 1997. (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-85545)).
10.11+ Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Michael J.
Hughes, dated as of August 17, 1999 (incorporated by
reference from 10.11 to the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-85545)).
10.13 Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement,
dated as of August 26, 1998, between the Registrant and the
"Purchaser" parties thereto (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (file no. 333-85545)).
10.14 Series C Convertible Purchase Agreement, dated as of July
12, 1999, between the Registrant and the "Purchaser" parties
thereto (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.15 to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file no.
333-85545)).
10.15 Second Amended and Restated Shareholders' Agreement, dated
as of July 12, 1999, among the Registrant and the holders of
the capital stock of the Registrant who become parties
thereto (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.16 to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file no.
333-85545)).
10.16 First Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement,
dated as of July 12, 1999, among the Registrant and the
holders of the capital stock of the Registrant who become
parties thereto (incorporated by reference from Exhibit
10.17 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(file no. 333-85545)).
10.17 Shareholders Agreement, dated as of March 28, 1998, relating
to VIP Calling (Hong Kong) Limited (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.18 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-85545)).
10.18 Amendment No. 1 to the Shareholders Agreement, dated as of
March 28, 1998, relating to VIP Calling (Hong Kong) Limited
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.19 to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file no.
333-85545)).
10.19 Amendment No. 2 to the Shareholders Agreement, dated as of
March 28, 1998, relating to VIP Calling (Hong Kong) Limited
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.20 to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file no.
333-85545)).
10.20 Loan and Security Agreement between the Registrant and
Silicon Valley Bank, dated as of June 18, 1999 (incorporated
by reference from Exhibit 10.21 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-85545)).
10.21 Stock Restriction Agreement, dated as of August 26, 1998,
between the Registrant and Ofer Gneezy and Gordon VanderBrug
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.22 to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file no.
333-85545)).
10.22 Alliance Agreement, dated January 4, 1999, between the
Registrant and Cisco Systems, Inc. (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.23 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file no. 33-85545)).
10.23 Memorandum of Agreement, dated August 16, 1999, between the
Registrant and NetSpeak Corporation (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.24 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-85545)).
68
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
- --------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------
10.24 Strategic Partner Agreement between NetSpeak Corporation and
the Registrant, dated as of September 15, 1999 (incorporated
by reference from Exhibit 10.25 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-85545)).
10.25+ 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of the Registrant, as
amended (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.26 to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file
no. 333-96535)).
10.26 Lease between the Registrant and NWT Partners, Ltd. with
respect to property located at 100 N. Biscayne Boulevard,
Miami, Florida (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.27
to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file
no. 333-96535)).
10.27 Lease, dated October 22, 1999, between the Registrant and
Roger P. Nordblom and Peter C. Nordblom, as Trustees of
N.W. Building 1 Associates under Declaration of Trust dated
November 11, 1984 and filed with the Middlesex South
Registry District of the Land Court as Document
Number 674807 with respect to property located at 10 Second
Avenue, Burlington, Massachusetts (incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 10.28 to the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-96535)).
10.28+ Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Charles
Giambalvo, dated as of February 8, 2000 (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.29 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-96535)).
10.29 Supply Contract, dated as of December 30, 1999, between the
Registrant and Belle Systems A/S (incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 10.30 to the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-96535)).
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant (incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 21.1 to the Registrant's Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (file no. 333-85545)).
23.1 Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP.
- ------------------------
+ Represents a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
(b) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K DURING THE FOURTH QUARTER OF FISCAL 2000:
None.
69
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 26, 2001 IBASIS, INC.
By: /s/ OFER GNEEZY
-----------------------------------------
Ofer Gneezy
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and
in the capacities indicated.
/s/ OFER GNEEZY
------------------------------------------- President and Chief Executive Officer and
Ofer Gneezy Director (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ GORDON J. VANDERBRUG
------------------------------------------- Executive Vice President and Director
Gordon J. VanderBrug
/s/ MICHAEL J. HUGHES Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
------------------------------------------- Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
Michael J. Hughes Officer)
/s/ CHARLES N. CORFIELD
------------------------------------------- Director
Charles N. Corfield
/s/ CHARLES S. HOUSER
------------------------------------------- Director
Charles S. Houser
/s/ JOHN JARVE
------------------------------------------- Director
John Jarve
------------------------------------------- Director
Carl Redfield
/s/ CHARLES M. SKIBO
------------------------------------------- Director
Charles M. Skibo
70