Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

For the quarterly period ended March 23, 2003

or

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number 001-10811

SMART & FINAL INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(323) 869-7500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

  Yes  x    No  ¨

As of April 30, 2003, the registrant had outstanding 29,893,211 shares of common stock.

Table of Contents

SMART & FINAL INC.

Index

2

Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements

When used in this report, the words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate” and similar expressions, together with other discussion of future trends or results, are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including those discussed below that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date hereof. All of these forward-looking statements are based on estimates and assumptions made by our management which, although believed to be reasonable, are inherently uncertain and difficult to predict; therefore, undue reliance should not be placed upon such statements. Actual results may differ materially and adversely from such statements due to known and unknown factors. The following important factors, among others, could cause our results of operations to be materially and adversely affected in future periods:

Many of these factors are beyond our control. There can be no assurance that we will not incur new or additional unforeseen costs in connection with the ongoing conduct of our business. Accordingly, any forward-looking statements included herein do not purport to be predictions of future events or circumstances and may not be realized. Additional information regarding these factors and other risks is included in Item 1—Business, Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2002.

3

Table of Contents

SMART & FINAL INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(dollars in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

SMART & FINAL INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

SMART & FINAL INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(dollars in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

SMART & FINAL INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Smart & Final Inc. is a Delaware corporation and, as of March 23, 2003, was a 55.8 percent owned subsidiary of Casino USA, Inc (“Casino USA”). References in this report to “we”, “our” and “us” are to Smart & Final Inc. and its subsidiaries, collectively.

Casino Guichard-Perrachon, S.A. (“Casino France”), a publicly traded French joint stock limited liability company, is the principal shareholder of Casino USA. Collectively, Casino France and its subsidiaries own approximately 58.8 percent of our common stock as of March 23, 2003.

The consolidated balance sheet as of March 23, 2003 and the consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the twelve weeks ended March 23, 2003 and March 24, 2002 are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, which consisted of normal recurring items necessary for a fair presentation of these financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, have been included.

These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2002.

On January 17, 2003 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” The objective of Interpretation No. 46 is to improve financial reporting by companies involved with variable interest entities. Interpretation No. 46 changes certain consolidation requirements by requiring a variable interest entity to be consolidated by a company that is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest entity’s activities or entitled to receive a majority of the entity’s residual returns or both.

In November 2001, we entered into a five-year operating lease agreement (“Lease Agreement”) with a national banking association. Participants in this transaction include several banks and financing institutions as well as Casino USA, which owned 55.8 percent of our common stock at March 23, 2003. Casino USA’s share of participation is $16.1 million. The Lease Agreement, with a value of $87.0 million and an interest rate of 9.07%, provides for the financing of three distribution facilities and 15 store locations. The Lease Agreement expires on November 30, 2006. At the end of the term, the Lease Agreement requires us to elect to purchase all the properties by a final payment of $86.4 million or sell all the properties to a third party. If the properties are sold to a third party and the aggregate sales price is less than $69.2 million, we are obligated to pay the difference of the aggregate sales price and $69.2 million.

7

Table of Contents

The Lease Agreement is currently accounted for as an operating lease; thus the related fixed assets and lease liabilities are not included in our consolidated balance sheets. Under Interpretation No. 46, the Lease Agreement, as it is currently structured, would be considered a variable interest entity and subject to consolidation. We are evaluating whether it is desirable to negotiate and restructure the lease facility in response to the new accounting requirements under Interpretation No. 46, or alternatively to consolidate this entity as currently structured.

The consolidation requirements of Interpretation No. 46 apply to entities created before February 1, 2003, no later than the beginning of the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The provisions of Interpretation No. 46 may be applied by restating previously issued financial statements for one or more years with a cumulative effect adjustment as of the beginning of the first year restated; however, restatement is not required. We have not yet determined whether we will adopt the provisions of Interpretation No. 46 through restatement of previously issued financial statements or current application with a cumulative effect adjustment as of the date adopted.

If we had consolidated this entity effective the beginning of fiscal year 2003, the estimated impact to our financial statements is described below. The amounts included in the consolidated balance sheet related to the variable interest entity as of December 30, 2002 would have been as follows, in millions:

The cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle at December 30, 2002 would have been $4.9 million, representing, net of tax effect, the amount of depreciation and interest expense, in excess of the rental income that would have been recorded through that date. For the 2003 fiscal year, rental expense would decrease $8.0 million, interest expense would increase $7.9 million and depreciation expense would increase $1.7 million.

Our fiscal year ends on the Sunday closest to December 31. Each fiscal year consists of twelve-week periods in the first, second and fourth quarters and a sixteen-week period in the third quarter.

As of March 23, 2003, we had an interest rate collar agreement with a major bank to limit the impact of interest rate fluctuations on floating rate debt. This agreement, expiring in November 2004, hedges principal amounts of an aggregate of $70 million and limits the effect of LIBOR fluctuations to interest rate ranges from 5.48% to 8.00%. This agreement is designated as a cash flow hedge and is considered fully effective. Accordingly, the instrument is marked to market at the end of every quarter, with the changes in fair value recorded as other

8

Table of Contents

comprehensive income (“OCI”) and the ineffective portion recorded to current earnings and included under interest expense, net on the consolidated statements of income.

This agreement had a cumulative loss of $4,323,000 recorded to OCI as of March 23, 2003 and $4,936,000 at the beginning of fiscal year 2003. The change in the cumulative loss is comprised of reclassification of the ineffective portion from OCI to current earnings and a slight decrease in fair value of the hedge as of March 23, 2003. Such reclassification aggregated $667,000 in the twelve weeks ended March 23, 2003 and $769,000 in the twelve weeks ended March 24, 2002. We estimate that $2,500,000 of net derivative loss included in OCI will be recognized in results of operations within the next twelve months.

Comprehensive income was computed as follows, amounts in thousands:

See Note 4 for the activities recorded to OCI due to changes in fair values of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges during the reporting period.

In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, the functional currency for our Mexico operations has been the Mexican Peso. As such, foreign currency translation gains and losses are included in OCI.

Interest expense was incurred primarily on borrowings under a revolving bank credit facility. Interest paid on our debt aggregated $3.0 million in the twelve weeks ended March 23, 2003 and $3.6 million in the twelve weeks ended March 24, 2002.

9

Table of Contents

Smart & Final Inc. and Casino USA are parties to a tax sharing arrangement covering income tax obligations in the state of California. Under this arrangement, we make tax sharing payments to, or receive benefits from, Casino USA based upon pre-tax income for financial reporting purposes adjusted for certain agreed upon items. Tax payments made to, or benefits received from, governments and Casino USA are as follows:

We have stock options granted to our employees and members of our Board of Directors under both the Long-Term Equity Compensation Plan and the Stock Incentive Plan. We account for options under these plans using the intrinsic value method as allowed under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Disclosures of pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share are required under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” which uses the fair value method. As of fiscal year end 2002, we adopted SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure”, regarding the additional disclosure requirements of pro forma information. The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

10

Table of Contents

The following is the pro forma information had the fair value method under SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, been adopted:

The impact of applying SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, in this pro forma disclosure is not necessarily indicative of the effect on income in the future. SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, does not apply to awards granted prior to 1995. We anticipate making additional stock-based compensation awards in the future.

Earnings per common share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Earnings per common share, assuming dilution, includes the weighted average number of common stock equivalents outstanding related to stock options.

Our two reportable segments are Stores and broadline Foodservice. The Stores segment provides food and related items in bulk sizes and quantities through non-membership grocery warehouse stores. The broadline Foodservice distribution segment provides delivery of food, restaurant equipment and supplies to mainly restaurant customers and Smart & Final stores. Corporate Expense is comprised primarily of corporate expenses incidental to the activities of the reportable segments and rental income from Smart & Final stores and Smart & Final Mexico. Our 50%-owned joint venture in Mexico is reported on the equity basis of accounting. These reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services. They are managed separately because each segment requires different technology and marketing strategies.

11

Table of Contents

The accounting policies of the segments are consistent with those described in the summary of significant accounting policies included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2002. We evaluate performance based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes, not including nonrecurring gains and losses.

The sales, profit or loss and other information of each segment are as follows, amounts in thousands:

We were named as a defendant in a suit filed on September 13, 2001 in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles. This suit, Sergio Camacho vs. Smart & Final Inc., was filed by the plaintiff, on his behalf and on behalf of all other store managers and assistant managers in California, alleging that we misclassified the status of store managers and assistant managers in California as exempt employees for employment purposes. The action seeks to be classified as a “class action” and seeks unspecified monetary damages. The merits of this action are being actively investigated and (a) we believe that the merits of this action do not warrant class action status; (b) we believe we have certain defenses to the claim; and (c) we are unable to assess the ultimate determination of this action and what effect, if any, that may result.

12

Table of Contents

We are named as a defendant in a number of other lawsuits or are otherwise a party to certain litigation arising in the ordinary course from our operations. We do not believe that the ultimate determination of these cases will either individually or in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.

13

Table of Contents

Management’s discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2002.

Each of our fiscal years consists of twelve-week periods in the first, second and fourth quarters of the fiscal year and a sixteen-week period in the third quarter.

Summary

Our net income was $0.2 million, or $0.01 per diluted share, for the twelve weeks ended March 23, 2003, compared to net income of $0.6 million, or $0.02 per diluted share, for the twelve weeks ended March 24, 2002.

Our operating income decreased 26.8%, or $1.1 million, from $4.1 million in last year’s first quarter to $3.0 million in the twelve weeks ended March 23, 2003. Stores operating income decreased $0.1 million in first quarter 2003 when compared to the same quarter of 2002 due to increased store operating expenses, primarily in fringe benefit costs. Broadline foodservice operating loss increased $0.8 million in the first quarter of 2003 due to decreased sales and margin rates.

Interest expense, net decreased $0.1 million in the first quarter of 2003 compared to first quarter 2002 as a result of lower average outstanding debt levels.

14

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following table shows, for the periods indicated, certain condensed consolidated statements of income data, expressed as a percentage of sales. Totals may not aggregate due to rounding.

The following table sets forth pre-tax income or loss, in millions, for each of our various reportable segments:

Stores segment pre-tax income decreased for the quarter as a result of increased store operating expenses partially offset by increased gross margin rates. Broadline Foodservice segment pre-tax loss increased for the quarter due to decreased sales and gross margin rates. Corporate Expense remained at $3.0 million for the quarter as decreased interest expense was offset by decreased real estate gains.

Mexico operations are not consolidated and are reported on the equity basis of accounting.

15

Table of Contents

Comparison of Twelve Weeks Ended March 23, 2003 with Twelve Weeks Ended March 24, 2002.

Sales

First quarter 2003 sales were $462.4 million, up 4.0% from $444.8 million in the first quarter of 2002.

Stores sales increased 5.4%, from $350.0 million in first quarter 2002 to $368.9 million in first quarter 2003. The sales increase was attributable to the improved comparable store sales and the new and relocated stores opened since the first quarter of 2002. Comparable store sales for the first quarter of 2003 increased 3.9% over prior year’s same quarter. Average comparable transaction size increased by 0.5% to $37.70 in the first quarter of 2003. During first quarter 2003, we opened two new stores and relocated one. As of March 23, 2003, we operated 233 stores compared to 227 stores at the end of the first quarter of 2002.

Broadline Foodservice sales decreased 1.4%, from $94.9 million in the first quarter of 2002 to $93.5 million in the current year’s first quarter. Sales growth in the first quarter of 2003 was adversely affected by the general economic downturn.

Gross margin

Gross margin increased 4.8%, from $59.6 million in the first quarter of 2002 to $62.4 million in the current year quarter. As a percentage of sales, gross margin increased from 13.4% in the first quarter of 2002 to 13.5% in first quarter 2003.

Gross margins in the Stores segment increased $3.9 million to $55.1 million, and as a percentage of sales, increased from 14.6% in first quarter 2002 to 14.9% in the current year’s quarter. The increase in gross margins as a percentage of sales was primarily the result of improved merchandise margins and improved inventory control, partially offset by the increased occupancy costs associated with new and relocated stores opened since the first quarter of 2002.

Gross margins in the broadline Foodservice segment decreased $1.1 million to $7.3 million and as a percentage of sales, decreased from 8.8% in first quarter 2002 to 7.8% in the first quarter of 2003. The decrease in gross margins was attributable to the competitive environment and product price deflation in a time of economic downturn. Warehouse and transportation costs decreased in the northern California unit but increased in the Florida unit.

Operating and administrative expenses

Operating and administrative expenses for the first quarter of 2003 were $59.4 million, up $4.0 million, or 7.1%, over the first quarter of 2002. These expenses, as a percentage of sales, increased from 12.5% in the first quarter of 2002 to 12.8% in the first quarter of 2003.

Operating and administrative expenses increased in the Stores segment primarily due to increased fringe benefit costs in pension and medical insurance and other store operating

16

Table of Contents

expenses, partially offset by decreased marketing expenses. Operating and administrative expenses slightly decreased in the broadline Foodservice segment due to expense reductions in the northern California unit. The increase in corporate expenses was primarily due to a decrease in the gain from sale of properties.

Interest expense, net

Interest expense, net decreased from $2.9 million recorded in first quarter 2002 to $2.8 million in the first quarter of 2003 due to lower average outstanding debt levels.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash flows and financial positions

Net cash provided by operating activities was $18.0 million in the first quarter of 2003 compared to $12.2 million in the same quarter of 2002. The increase or decrease in cash provided by operating activities reflects our operating performance and the timing of receipts and disbursements. In first quarter 2003, decreases in trade notes and accounts receivable and inventories were partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable and an increase in prepaid expenses and other assets.

Net cash used in investing activities was $5.6 million in first quarter 2003 compared to $6.4 million in the first quarter of 2002. The decrease in first quarter 2003, as compared to the same quarter of 2002, was primarily due to the decreased capital expenditure requirements for new and relocated stores, partially offset by decreased proceeds from disposal of closed or relocated store properties. Capital expenditures for first quarter 2003 totaled $4.5 million, which consisted of $4.3 million in support of the Stores segment and $0.2 million in support of the broadline Foodservice segment.

Net cash used in financing activities was $5.6 million in first quarter 2003 compared to $1.2 million in the first quarter of 2002. Net cash used in financing activities in first quarter 2003 primarily reflected payments on bank debt and capital leases.

At March 23, 2003, we had cash and cash equivalents of $33.3 million, stockholders’ equity of $272.1 million and debt, excluding capital leases, of $129.8 million. Our working capital was a $17.3 million deficit at March 23, 2003, compared to a $20.6 million deficit at December 29, 2002. The working capital deficit at March 23, 2003 and December 29, 2002 is the result of classification of $124.8 million and $130.0 million, respectively of borrowings under a revolving bank credit facility as a short-term liability.

Capital expenditure and other capital requirements

Our primary requirement for capital is the financing of the building, leasehold improvements, equipment and initial set-up expenditures for new, relocated and remodeled stores as well as general working capital requirements. During the twelve weeks ended March 23, 2003, we opened two new stores and relocated one store. New store growth is planned to continue in

17

Table of Contents

the remainder of fiscal 2003. We estimate that new capital expenditures for 2003 will aggregate approximately $38.0 million, including $36.5 million in support of the Stores segment and $1.5 million in support of the broadline Foodservice segment. However, we cannot assure that these estimates will be realized and our capital program plans are subject to change upon our further review.

We have various retirement plans, which subject us to various funding obligations. Our noncontributory pension plan covers substantially all of our full time employees, except for those employees of our broadline Foodservice segment. We fund this plan with contributions as required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Recent changes in the benefit plan assumptions as well as the funded status of the plan have impacted the funding and expense levels for 2003 and future periods. We estimate that these changes may require cash contributions to the plan of approximately $6 million to $8 million by fiscal year end 2003.

Bank credit facility, lease facility and other financing activities

In November 2001, we entered into a $175.0 million three-year senior secured revolving credit facility (“Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of banks. The Credit Agreement expires on November 30, 2004. At our option, the Credit Agreement can be used to support up to $15.0 million of commercial letters of credit. Availability under the Credit Agreement is subject to a formula based on the value of eligible accounts receivable and inventory. At March 23, 2003, $124.8 million of revolving loan and $4.2 million of letters of credit were outstanding and the remaining availability based on the formula was $14.1 million.

In November 2001, we entered into a five-year operating lease agreement (“Lease Agreement”) with a national banking association. Participants in this transaction include several banks and financing institutions as well as Casino USA, Inc. (“Casino USA”) which owned 55.8 percent of our common stock at March 23, 2003. Casino USA’s share of participation is $16.1 million. The Lease Agreement, with a value of $87.0 million and an interest rate of 9.07%, provides for the financing of the three distribution facilities and 15 store locations. The Lease Agreement expires on November 30, 2006. At the end of the term, the Lease Agreement requires us to elect to purchase all the properties by a final payment of $86.4 million or sell all the properties to a third party. If the properties are sold to a third party and the aggregate sales price is less than $69.2 million, we are obligated to pay the difference of the aggregate sales price and $69.2 million.

Both the Credit Agreement and the Lease Agreement contain various customary and restrictive covenants, including restrictions on cash dividends declared or paid and additional debt and capital expenditures, and require us to maintain certain fixed charge coverage ratios and other financial ratios under each agreement. The covenants do not require us to maintain a public debt rating or a certain liquidity level. As of December 29, 2002, we were not in compliance with certain of these financial covenants. In February 2003, we obtained waivers of non-compliance as of December 29, 2002 and an amendment of certain covenants for the first quarter of 2003. We intend to negotiate and enter into an amended Credit Agreement and Lease Agreement during 2003. Pending the execution of an amended Credit Agreement, our obligation under the revolving credit facility has been classified as a current liability in our consolidated

18

Table of Contents

balance sheets as of December 29, 2002 and March 23, 2003. If we are unable to negotiate and enter into an amended Credit Agreement and Lease Agreement, we may be required to renegotiate the terms of the waivers or seek alternative means of financing such obligations. Additionally, we may negotiate and restructure the Lease Agreement in response to the new accounting requirements contained in Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” released by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) in January 2003. See related discussion in New Accounting Pronouncements below.

Historically, our primary source of liquidity has been cash flows from operations. Additionally, we have availability under bank credit facilities. We expect to be able to fund future acquisitions and other cash requirements by a combination of available cash, cash from operations and other borrowings and proceeds from the issuance of equity securities. We believe that our sources of funds are adequate to provide for working capital, capital expenditures, and debt service requirements for the foreseeable future.

New Accounting Pronouncements

On January 17, 2003 the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46. The objective of Interpretation No. 46 is to improve financial reporting by companies involved with variable interest entities. Interpretation No. 46 changes certain consolidation requirements by requiring a variable interest entity to be consolidated by a company that is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest entity’s activities or entitled to receive a majority of the entity’s residual returns or both.

The Lease Agreement discussed in Bank Credit Facility, Lease Facility and Other Financial Activities above is currently accounted for as an operating lease; thus the related fixed assets and lease liabilities are not included in our consolidated balance sheets. Under Interpretation No. 46, the Lease Agreement, as it is currently structured, would be considered a variable interest entity and subject to consolidation. We are evaluating whether it is desirable to negotiate and restructure the lease facility in response to the new accounting requirements under Interpretation No. 46, or alternatively to consolidate this entity as currently structured.

The consolidation requirements of Interpretation No. 46 apply to entities created before February 1, 2003, no later than the beginning of the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The provisions of Interpretation No. 46 may be applied by restating previously issued financial statements for one or more years with a cumulative effect adjustment as of the beginning of the first year restated; however, restatement is not required. We have not yet determined whether we will adopt the provisions of Interpretation No. 46 through restatement of previously issued financial statements or current application with a cumulative effect adjustment as of the date adopted.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported assets, liabilities, sales and expenses in the accompanying financial statements. Critical accounting policies are those that require the most subjective and complex

19

Table of Contents

judgments, often employing the use of estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. These critical accounting policies, under different conditions or using different assumption or estimates, could show materially different results on our financial condition and results of operations. Our critical accounting policies are described in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2002. In the quarter ended March 23, 2003, we did not make any changes in our critical accounting policies.

20

Table of Contents

We are exposed to market risks relating to fluctuations in interest rates and the exchange rate between the U.S. Dollar and Mexican Peso. Our major financial risk management objective is to minimize the negative impact of interest rate fluctuations on our earnings and cash flows. As of March 23, 2003, our exposure to foreign currency risk was limited. Additionally, we are exposed to the market fluctuations associated with stock we received as a result of the demutualization transactions of a mutual insurance company in December 2001. As of March 23, 2003, the fair market value of the stock was $1.2 million.

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk is managed through the use of an interest rate collar agreement to limit the effect of interest rate fluctuations on floating rate debt. The agreement, expiring in November 2004, hedges principal amounts of an aggregate of $70 million and limits the effect of LIBOR fluctuations to interest rate ranges from 5.48% to 8.00%. This agreement was entered into with a major financial institutions thereby minimizing risk of credit loss.

Credit Risk

We are exposed to credit risk on trade notes and accounts receivable. We provide credit primarily to foodservice distribution customers in the ordinary course of business and performs ongoing credit evaluations. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade notes and accounts receivables are limited due to the number of customers comprising our customer base. We currently believe our allowance for doubtful accounts is sufficient to cover customer credit risks.

Foreign Currency Risk

Our exposure to foreign currency risk is limited to our operations under Smart & Final de Mexico S.A. de C.V. (“Smart & Final Mexico”) and the equity earnings in its Mexico joint venture. As of March 23, 2003, such exposure was the $4.5 million net investment in Smart & Final Mexico, comprised primarily of its Mexico joint venture. Our other transactions are conducted in U.S. dollars and are not exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency. We do not hedge our foreign currency exposure and therefore are not exposed to such hedging risk.

21

Table of Contents

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures: An evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Sections 13(a)-14(c) and 15(d)-14(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”)) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and several other members of senior management within the 90-day period preceding the filing date of this Form 10-Q. The procedures as currently in effect are effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Act are (1) accumulated and communicated to our management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) in a timely manner, and (2) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls: In the quarter ended March 23, 2003, we did not make any significant changes in, nor take any corrective actions regarding, our internal controls or other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation referred to in the previous paragraph, including any corrective action with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

22

Table of Contents

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.    Legal Proceedings

We have been named as a defendant in a suit filed on September 13, 2001 in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles. This suit, Sergio Camacho vs. Smart & Final Inc., was filed by the plaintiff, on his behalf and on behalf of all other store managers and assistant managers in California, alleging that we misclassified the status of store managers and assistant managers in California as exempt employees for employment purposes. The action seeks to be classified as a “class action” and seeks unspecified monetary damages. The merits of this action are being actively investigated and (a) we believe that the merits of this action do not warrant class action status; (b) we believe we have certain defenses to the claim; and (c) we are unable to assess the ultimate determination of this action and what effect, if any, that may result.

We are the defendant in a number of other lawsuits or are otherwise a party to certain litigation arising in the ordinary course from our operations. We do not believe that the ultimate determination of these cases will either individually or in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.

Item 2.    Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

Item 3.    Defaults upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Not applicable.

Item 5.    Other Information

Not applicable.

23

Table of Contents

Item 6.    Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)    Exhibits:

(b)    Reports on Form 8-K

24

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Ross E. Roeder, certify that:

25

Table of Contents

I, Richard N. Phegley, certify that:

26

Table of Contents

27