Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2002
or
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission
file number 0-19654
VITESSE
SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
77-0138960 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification
No.) |
741 Calle Plano
Camarillo, CA 93012
(Address of principal executive offices)
(805) 388-3700
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days: Yes ( Ö ) No ( )
As of July 31, 2002, there were 201,008,076 shares of $0.01 par value common stock outstanding.
VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
Page Number
|
|
PART I |
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
Item 1 |
|
Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Item 2 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Item 3 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
PART II |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
Item 2 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Item 4 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Item 6 |
|
|
|
27 |
1
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands, except share data)
|
|
June 30, 2002
|
|
|
Sept. 30, 2001
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
208,470 |
|
|
$ |
92,847 |
|
Short-term investments (principally marketable securities) |
|
|
82,993 |
|
|
|
126,938 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
47,213 |
|
|
|
53,730 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
26,870 |
|
|
|
44,833 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
18,017 |
|
|
|
12,447 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
383,563 |
|
|
|
353,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments (principally marketable securities) |
|
|
180,772 |
|
|
|
454,849 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
116,430 |
|
|
|
248,332 |
|
Restricted long-term deposits |
|
|
92,598 |
|
|
|
87,987 |
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
155,993 |
|
|
|
553,066 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
25,718 |
|
|
|
42,057 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,902 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
52,840 |
|
|
|
69,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,007,914 |
|
|
$ |
1,932,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,271 |
|
|
$ |
897 |
|
Current portion of convertible subordinated debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,765 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
16,933 |
|
|
|
21,463 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
18,189 |
|
|
|
20,263 |
|
Current portion of accrued restructuring |
|
|
25,318 |
|
|
|
2,935 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
2,962 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
64,673 |
|
|
|
128,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
1,703 |
|
Accrued restructuring |
|
|
13,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liability |
|
|
1,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible subordinated debt, net of $1,121 discount |
|
|
452,707 |
|
|
|
467,328 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
5,915 |
|
|
|
6,296 |
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value. Authorized 500,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 199,205,502 and 197,440,321 shares
on June 30, 2002 and Sept. 30, 2001, respectively |
|
|
1,992 |
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,399,065 |
|
|
|
1,396,466 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
(57,109 |
) |
|
|
(81,582 |
) |
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) |
|
|
(875,040 |
) |
|
|
12,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
468,908 |
|
|
|
1,329,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,007,914 |
|
|
$ |
1,932,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2002
|
|
|
June 30, 2001
|
|
|
Mar. 31, 2002
|
|
|
June 30, 2002
|
|
|
June 30, 2001
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
43,017 |
|
|
$ |
60,138 |
|
|
$ |
42,089 |
|
|
$ |
124,255 |
|
|
$ |
346,961 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
41,512 |
|
|
|
81,052 |
|
|
|
22,640 |
|
|
|
98,068 |
|
|
|
179,403 |
|
Engineering, research and development |
|
|
41,305 |
|
|
|
37,158 |
|
|
|
44,335 |
|
|
|
130,671 |
|
|
|
108,924 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
19,602 |
|
|
|
23,786 |
|
|
|
17,035 |
|
|
|
54,108 |
|
|
|
59,710 |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
144,876 |
|
|
|
2,544 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
209,451 |
|
|
|
2,544 |
|
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charge |
|
|
403,000 |
|
|
|
22,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
403,000 |
|
|
|
22,871 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
3,046 |
|
|
|
20,523 |
|
|
|
3,147 |
|
|
|
9,339 |
|
|
|
61,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
653,341 |
|
|
|
187,934 |
|
|
|
87,433 |
|
|
|
904,637 |
|
|
|
435,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(610,324 |
) |
|
|
(127,796 |
) |
|
|
(45,344 |
) |
|
|
(780,382 |
) |
|
|
(88,241 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
3,878 |
|
|
|
11,372 |
|
|
|
4,843 |
|
|
|
13,880 |
|
|
|
40,496 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(3,263 |
) |
|
|
(7,795 |
) |
|
|
(3,900 |
) |
|
|
(11,487 |
) |
|
|
(24,488 |
) |
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,799 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
2,432 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
2,393 |
|
|
|
14,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and extraordinary item |
|
|
(609,709 |
) |
|
|
(125,364 |
) |
|
|
(44,401 |
) |
|
|
(777,989 |
) |
|
|
(74,032 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
126,195 |
|
|
|
(48,767 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,700 |
|
|
|
(14,313 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before extraordinary item |
|
|
(735,904 |
) |
|
|
(76,597 |
) |
|
|
(44,401 |
) |
|
|
(897,689 |
) |
|
|
(59,719 |
) |
Extraordinary gain on early extinguishment of debt, net of tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,502 |
|
|
|
7,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(735,904 |
) |
|
$ |
(69,568 |
) |
|
$ |
(44,401 |
) |
|
$ |
(887,187 |
) |
|
$ |
(52,690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted extraordinary gain per share: |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(3.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.38 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.48 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(3.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.38 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.48 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share computations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
198,459 |
|
|
|
184,474 |
|
|
|
198,043 |
|
|
|
198,017 |
|
|
|
182,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
198,459 |
|
|
|
184,474 |
|
|
|
198,043 |
|
|
|
198,017 |
|
|
|
182,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
3
VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2002
|
|
|
June 30, 2001
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(887,187 |
) |
|
$ |
(52,690 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
56,701 |
|
|
|
98,614 |
|
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets |
|
|
403,000 |
|
|
|
22,871 |
|
Property and equipment write off |
|
|
141,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory write off |
|
|
30,533 |
|
|
|
41,146 |
|
Prepaid maintenance write off |
|
|
28,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued restructuring |
|
|
38,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt issue costs and debt discount |
|
|
1,296 |
|
|
|
2,864 |
|
Amortization of deferred compensation |
|
|
22,757 |
|
|
|
9,593 |
|
Extraordinary gain on extinguishment of debt, net |
|
|
(10,502 |
) |
|
|
(7,029 |
) |
Gain on derivative instrument |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in equity associated with tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,463 |
|
Deferred taxes, net |
|
|
127,044 |
|
|
|
(63,290 |
) |
Change in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in, net of effects of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
6,517 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
(12,570 |
) |
|
|
(40,453 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(21,771 |
) |
|
|
(30,871 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
2,230 |
|
|
|
(18,794 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in, net of effects of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(4,530 |
) |
|
|
11,124 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
(3,936 |
) |
|
|
6,092 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
6,428 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,359 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
(79,152 |
) |
|
|
25,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments, net |
|
|
318,022 |
|
|
|
(2,683 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(57,221 |
) |
|
|
(133,495 |
) |
Restricted long-term deposits |
|
|
(4,611 |
) |
|
|
(22,367 |
) |
Payment for purchase of companies, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,481 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
256,190 |
|
|
|
(170,026 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2002
|
|
|
June 30, 2001
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments under long-term debt and capital leases, net |
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
(9,759 |
) |
Repurchase of convertible subordinated debt |
|
|
(65,050 |
) |
|
|
(51,650 |
) |
Capital contributions by minority interest limited partners |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
4,789 |
|
Distribution to Venture Fund partners from sale of investments |
|
|
(462 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
4,333 |
|
|
|
27,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(61,415 |
) |
|
|
(28,893 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
115,623 |
|
|
|
(173,198 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
92,847 |
|
|
|
257,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
208,470 |
|
|
$ |
83,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
6,791 |
|
|
$ |
15,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
532 |
|
|
$ |
8,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment financing |
|
$ |
475 |
|
|
$ |
5,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of accrued acquisition costs |
|
$ |
1,073 |
|
|
$ |
76,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of stock options |
|
$ |
1,439 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Basis of
Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
are unaudited and include the accounts of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation and its subsidiaries (the Company). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. In managements opinion, all adjustments (consisting
only of normal recurring accruals) which are necessary for a fair presentation of financial condition and results of operations are reflected in the attached interim financial statements. This report should be read in conjunction with the audited
financial statements presented in the 2001 Annual Report. Footnotes and other disclosures which would substantially duplicate the disclosures in the Companys audited financial statements for fiscal year 2001 contained in the Annual Report have
been omitted. The interim financial information herein is not necessarily representative of the results to be expected for any subsequent period.
Cash Equivalents and Investments
The Company considers all
highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Investments with maturities over three months and up to one year are considered short-term investments. Investments with maturities over one year are
considered long-term investments. Cash equivalents and investments are principally composed of money market accounts, commercial paper rated A-1 or P-1 and obligations of the U.S. government and its agencies. Pursuant to SFAS No. 115 Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, the Company classifies its debt securities as held-to-maturity securities, which are recorded at amortized cost, adjusted for the amortization or accretion of premiums or discounts. As of
June 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001, the carrying value was substantially the same as market value.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company utilizes interest rate swap
agreements to manage interest rate exposures in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging
Activitiesan Amendment of SFAS No. 133. The Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value.
Computation of Net Income (Loss) per Share
Stock options and other convertible securities
exercisable for 42,233,306, 14,305,052 and 43,303,153 shares that were outstanding at June 30, 2002 and 2001, and March 31, 2002, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share, as the effect of their
inclusion would be antidilutive. The antidilutive common stock equivalents consist of employee stock options and the convertible subordinated debentures that are convertible into the Companys common stock at a conversion price of $112.19.
6
Reclassifications
Where necessary, prior periods information has been reclassified to conform to the current period condensed consolidated financial statement presentation.
Note 2. Restructuring Costs and Other Special Charges
In the first quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company announced a restructuring plan as a result of the continued decrease in demand for its
products, a shift in the industrys technology and the need to align its cost structure with significantly reduced revenue levels. In the third quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company announced additional steps to restructure its operations as a
result of continued adverse business conditions, a faster shift in technology away from its internal manufacturing process towards advanced outsourced CMOS-based processes, and a slower than previously expected trend in the outsourcing of products
to semiconductor vendors such as the Company. This restructuring plan included the termination of certain product lines, curtailment of certain research and development projects, a resulting workforce reduction, and the consolidation of excess
facilities. In connection with this restructuring the Company also wrote down certain fixed assets which were deemed to be impaired, and accrued costs associated with non-cancelable equipment and software contracts. Restructuring costs of $144.9
million and $209.5 million were recognized in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. A summary of restructuring costs and activity related to the restructuring liabilities for the nine months ended June 30, 2002, including a
rollforward of restructuring charges recognized in the prior year is outlined as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Workforce Reduction
|
|
|
Excess Facilities
|
|
|
Impairment Of Assets
|
|
|
Contract Settlement Costs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2001 |
|
$ |
1,229 |
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,935 |
|
Total charge |
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
3,855 |
|
|
170,363 |
|
|
34,221 |
|
|
209,451 |
|
Noncash charges |
|
|
|
|
|
(775 |
) |
|
(170,363 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(171,138 |
) |
Cash payments |
|
|
(1,139 |
) |
|
(1,130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
(2,358 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2002 |
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
3,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
34,132 |
|
|
38,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce reduction includes the cost of severance and related
benefits of 130 employees affected by the November 2001 restructuring. The termination of these employees was completed in the March 31, 2002 quarter. In July 2002, the Company reduced its workforce by approximately 183 employees. The severance
expense for this reduction will be recorded in the September 30, 2002 quarter.
The excess facilities charge
includes lease termination payments, non-cancelable lease costs and write off of leasehold improvements and office equipment related to these leases. The consolidation of our excess facilities resulted in charges of $3.4 million and $3.9 million in
the three and nine months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. These costs will be paid over the respective lease terms through May 2003.
The impairment of assets charge includes the write down of certain excess manufacturing equipment, including fabrication and test equipments, and prepaid maintenance contracts associated with that equipment. This charge also
included the write off of certain software
7
licenses under non-cancelable agreements associated with research and development employment positions
which were eliminated as a result of the cancellation of non-strategic and unprofitable projects. The impairment of assets resulted in charges of $107.2 million and $170.4 million in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2002, respectively.
Contract settlements costs represent fixed costs of non-cancelable equipment and software contracts. The Company
recorded a charge of $34.2 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2002 for the accrual of non-cancelable equipment and software contracts. These amounts will be paid out over the respective contract terms through fiscal 2005.
In the quarter ended June 30, 2001, the Company implemented a similar restructuring plan due to the sharp decline in demand for its
products resulting in a charge of $2.5 million, and an additional charge of $1.2 million recorded in the quarter ended September 30, 2001. There remained an accrued restructuring balance of $2.9 million as of September 30, 2001. In the nine months
ended June 30, 2002, the Companys activities related to the 2001 restructuring accrual resulted in cash payments of approximately $0.7 million and non-cash charges of approximately $0.8 million.
Note 3. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS 141), and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142). SFAS 141
requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001, and that certain intangible assets acquired in a business combination be recognized as assets apart from goodwill. SFAS 142 requires
goodwill to be tested for impairment under certain circumstances, and written down when impaired, rather than being amortized as previous standards required. Furthermore, SFAS 142 requires intangible assets, other than goodwill, to be amortized over
their useful lives unless these lives are determined to be indefinite. Other intangible assets are carried at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization is computed over the useful lives of the respective assets, generally two to ten years.
SFAS 142 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001; however, the Company has elected to
adopt the statement effective as of October 1, 2001. In accordance with SFAS 142, the Company has ceased amortizing goodwill totaling $552.0 million, including $6.4 million of acquired workforce previously classified as other intangible assets.
8
The following table presents details of the Companys total other intangible
assets (in thousands):
|
|
Gross Carrying Amount
|
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
|
Net Balance
|
June 30, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
813 |
|
(813 |
) |
|
|
Technology |
|
|
36,765 |
|
(13,299 |
) |
|
23,466 |
Covenants not to compete |
|
|
4,000 |
|
(1,748 |
) |
|
2,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
41,578 |
|
(15,860 |
) |
|
25,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
813 |
|
(610 |
) |
|
203 |
Technology |
|
|
43,765 |
|
(5,496 |
) |
|
38,269 |
Covenants not to compete |
|
|
4,000 |
|
(415 |
) |
|
3,585 |
Workforce |
|
|
11,110 |
|
(4,709 |
) |
|
6,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
59,688 |
|
(11,230 |
) |
|
48,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the amortization expense of other
intangible assets as reported in the Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
June 30, 2002
|
|
June 30, 2001
|
|
Mar. 31, 2002
|
|
June 30, 2002
|
|
June 30, 2001
|
Amortization expense |
|
$ |
3,046 |
|
$ |
20,523 |
|
$ |
3,147 |
|
$ |
9,339 |
|
$ |
61,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated future amortization expense of other intangible
assets is as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal year
|
|
Amount
|
2002 (remaining three months) |
|
$ |
2,064 |
2003 |
|
|
8,261 |
2004 |
|
|
6,513 |
2005 |
|
|
5,453 |
2006 |
|
|
3,011 |
2007 |
|
|
190 |
Thereafter |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
25,718 |
|
|
|
|
The following presents the impact of SFAS 142 on net income (loss)
and net income (loss) per share had the statement been in effect for the third quarter of fiscal 2001 and the nine month period ended June 30, 2001 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
9
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2002
|
|
|
June 30, 2001
|
|
|
Mar. 31, 2002
|
|
|
June 30, 2002
|
|
|
June 30, 2001
|
|
Reported net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(735,904 |
) |
|
$ |
(69,568 |
) |
|
$ |
(44,401 |
) |
|
$ |
(887,187 |
) |
|
$ |
(52,690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,181 |
|
Amortization of workforce |
|
|
|
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(735,904 |
) |
|
$ |
(49,214 |
) |
|
$ |
(44,401 |
) |
|
$ |
(887,187 |
) |
|
$ |
7,831 |
|
Basic net income (loss) per share as reported |
|
$ |
(3.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.38 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.48 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
Basic net income (loss) per share adjusted |
|
$ |
(3.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.48 |
) |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share as reported |
|
$ |
(3.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.38 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.48 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
Diluted net income (loss) per share adjusted |
|
$ |
(3.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.48 |
) |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
The Company only operates within one reporting unit. Therefore, any
allocation of goodwill is not required. Upon the adoption of SFAS 142 and in accordance with its provisions, the Company did not record any transitional impairment charges. Additionally, the workforce intangible asset has been combined with goodwill
effective October 1, 2001.
The Company is required to perform goodwill impairment tests on an annual basis and
between annual tests in certain circumstances. As a result of industry conditions, the Company determined that there were indicators of impairment to the carrying value of goodwill and purchased intangibles during the quarter ended June 30, 2002.
Accordingly, the Company evaluated the recoverability of its goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with SFAS 142. This involved writing down goodwill and intangible assets to their fair values. The amount of goodwill impairment
was based on the fair value of the Company, representing its only reporting unit utilizing a valuation based on both the income and market approach. The amount of impairment of other intangible assets was based on the fair value of these assets
using a discounted future cash flow model. During the quarter ended June 30, 2002, the Company recorded goodwill and other intangible asset impairment of $396 million and $7 million, respectively, totaling $403 million. Future goodwill impairment
tests may result in charges to earnings if the Company determines that goodwill has become impaired.
Note
4. Inventories, net
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
June 30, 2002
|
|
Sept. 30, 2001
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
4,209 |
|
$ |
3,978 |
Work in process and finished goods |
|
|
22,661 |
|
|
40,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,870 |
|
$ |
44,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The continued industry-wide reduction in capital spending and the resulting decrease in demand for the
Companys products, resulted in significant adjustments to reduce sales forecasts established at the end of fiscal year 2001 and the beginning of fiscal year 2002. As a result, the
10
Company recorded charges of $18.5 million and $12.0 million in accordance with the Companys
inventory reserve methodology, which were included in the cost of revenues in the quarters ended June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively.
Note 5. Debt
In October and November 2001, the Company
purchased $83.3 million principal amount of its 4% convertible subordinated debentures due March 2005 at prevailing market prices, for an aggregate amount of approximately $65.1 million. As a result, the Company recorded an extraordinary gain on
early extinguishment of debt of approximately $10.5 million, net of income taxes of $6.6 million and a proportion of deferred debt issuance costs of $1.1 million, in the quarter ended December 31, 2001.
Note 6. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
In the quarter ended December 31, 2001, the Company entered into an interest-rate related derivative instrument to manage its exposure on its debt instruments that is
recorded as a derivative liability. The Company does not enter into derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
By using derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates, the Company exposes itself to credit risk and market risk. Credit risk is the risk of the counter-party failing to perform under the terms of
the derivative contract when the contracts value is in the Companys favor. The Company minimizes the credit risk in derivative instruments by entering into transactions with high-quality counterparties.
Market risk is the adverse effect on the value of a financial instrument that results from a change in interest rates. The market risk
associated with the interest-rate contract is managed by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken.
The Company assesses interest rate risk by continually identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely impact expected future cash flows
and by evaluating hedging opportunities. The Company maintains risk management control systems to monitor interest rate risk attributable to both the Companys outstanding or forecasted debt obligations as well as the Companys offsetting
hedge positions. The risk management control systems involve the use of analytical techniques, including cash flow sensitivity analysis, to estimate the expected impact of changes in interest rates on the Companys debt.
The Company uses fixed debt to finance its operations. The debt obligation exposes the Company to variability in the fair value
of debt due to changes in interest rates. Management believes it is prudent to limit the variability. To meet this objective, management entered into an interest rate swap agreement to manage fluctuations in debt resulting from interest rate risk
and designated this agreement as the hedging instrument in a fair value hedging relationship under SFAS 133. This swap changes the fixed-rate exposure on the debt to variable. Under the terms of the interest rate swap, the Company receives fixed
interest rate payments and makes variable interest rate payments, thereby managing the value of debt.
11
Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap designated as hedging
instruments that effectively offset the fair value variability associated with fixed-rate, long-term debt are reported in interest expense as a yield adjustment of the hedged debt.
Interest expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2002 includes a deminimus amount of net gains representing fair value hedge ineffectiveness arising from slight
differences between the fair value change in the interest rate swap and the change in fair value of the hedged debt obligation. The maximum term over which the Company is hedging exposures to the variability of debt for interest risk is 39 months.
There were no hedges discontinued during the current quarter.
Note 6. Income Taxes
Year to date income tax expense is $119.7 million compared to tax benefit of $14.3 million for the same period in the prior
year. For the quarter ended June 30, 2002, the income tax expense was $126.2 million compared to a benefit of $48.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2001. The increase in tax expense for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2002 was due to
net tax charge of $126.2 million consisting of an increase to the valuation allowance of $145.8 million, partially offset by the reversal of income taxes payable of $19.6 million, resulting in an income tax receivable of $5.2 million. Management
continually evaluates our deferred tax asset as to whether it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized. In the evaluation of the realizability of deferred tax assets, the Company considers projections of
future taxable income and the reversal of temporary differences. In its most recent evaluation, management has determined that it is not more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized. Accordingly, a valuation reserve
has been recorded against the entire net deferred tax assets.
Item 2.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The information set forth in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations below includes forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), in particular, in Results of OperationsCost of Revenues, Engineering, Research and Development Costs, Interest Income and Interest
Expense and Liquidity and Capital Resources, and is subject to the safe harbor created by that section. Factors that management believes could cause results to differ materially from those projected in the forward looking
statements are set forth below in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Factors That May Affect Future Operating Results.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net revenue and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to our allowance for doubtful accounts and
sales returns, inventory reserves, goodwill and purchased intangible asset valuations, asset
12
impairments and income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect the
significant judgments and estimates we use in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, Sales Returns Reserve and Revenue Recognition
We evaluate
the collectibility of our accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. At June 30, 2002, we maintained an allowance for doubtful accounts and sales returns reserve of approximately 30% of gross accounts receivable. In circumstances where
we are aware of a specific customers inability to meet its financial obligations to us, we record a specific allowance to reduce the net receivable to the amount we reasonably believe will be collected. For all other customers, we recognize
allowances for doubtful accounts based on the length of time the receivables are past due, the current business environment and our historical experience. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate or if economic conditions
worsened, additional allowances may be required in the future.
We recognize product revenue when products are
shipped to customers, which is when title and risk of loss transfers to the customers. Revenue from development contracts is recognized upon attainment of specific milestones established under the customer contracts. Revenue from products
deliverable under development contracts, including design tools and prototype products, is recognized upon delivery. We record a provision for estimated sales returns in the same period as the related revenues are recorded. We base these estimates
on historical sales returns and other known factors. Actual returns could be different from our estimates and current provisions for sales returns and allowances, resulting in future charges to earnings.
Inventory Valuation
At each balance sheet date, we evaluate our ending inventories for excess quantities and obsolescence. This evaluation includes analyses of sales levels by product and projections of future demand. If inventories on hand are
in excess of forecasted demand, we do not record any value for the excess inventory. If we have previously recorded the value of such inventory determined to be in excess of projected demand, or if we determine that inventory is obsolete, we write
off these inventories in the period the determination is made. Due to reduced capital spending by our customers and the resulting reduction in demand for our products, we wrote off $18.5 million and $30.5 million of excess and obsolete inventory in
the three and nine months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. Remaining inventory balances are adjusted to approximate the lower of our standard manufacturing cost or market value. At June 30, 2002, we had inventories of $26.9 million compared to
$44.8 million at September 30, 2001. If future demand or market conditions are less favorable than our projections, additional inventory write-downs may be required, and would be reflected in cost of revenues in the period the revision is made.
Valuation of Goodwill, Purchased Intangible Assets and Long-Lived Assets
We perform goodwill impairment tests on an annual basis and on an interim basis if an event or circumstance indicates that it is more
likely than not that impairment has occurred. We assess the impairment of other intangible assets and long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we
13
consider important which could trigger an impairment review include significant underperformance to
historical or projected operating results, substantial changes in our business strategy, and significant negative industry or economic trends. If such indicators are present, for goodwill we evaluate the fair value of our one reporting unit to its
carrying value. For other intangible assets and long-lived assets we determine whether the sum of the estimated undiscounted cash flows attributable to the assets in question is less than their carrying value. If less, we recognize an impairment
loss based on the excess of the carrying amount of the assets over their respective fair values. Fair value of goodwill is determined by using a valuation model based on an income and market approach. Fair value of other intangible assets and
long-lived assets is determined by discounted future cash flows, appraisals or other methods. If the long-lived asset determined to be impaired is to be held and used, we recognize an impairment charge to the extent the present value of anticipated
net cash flows attributable to the asset are less than the assets carrying value. The fair value of the long-lived asset then becomes the assets new carrying value, which we depreciate over the remaining estimated useful life of the
asset. See Notes 2 and 3 to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding impairment. During the quarter ended June 30, 2002, we recorded goodwill and other intangible asset impairment of $396 million
and $7 million, respectively, totaling $403 million. We also recorded a charge of $107.2 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2002 for the write down of certain excess manufacturing equipment. To the extent we determine there are indicators of
impairment in future periods, additional write-downs may be required.
Accounting for Income Taxes
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our
income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves us estimating our actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as deferred revenue,
for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our consolidated balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future
taxable income and to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or increase this allowance in a period, we must include an expense within the tax
provision in the statement of operations.
Significant management judgment is required in determining our
provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. Management continually evaluates its deferred tax asset as to whether it is more likely than not
that the deferred tax assets will be realized. In its most recent evaluation, management has determined that it is not more likely than not that all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. Accordingly, a valuation reserve has been
recorded against the entire net deferred tax assets. A tax charge of $126.2 million dollars has been recorded in the quarter ended June 30, 2002 to record a valuation allowance of $145.8, partially offset by the reversal of income taxes payable of
$19.6 million, resulting in an income tax receivable of $5.2 million.
14
Results of Operations
Revenues
Total revenues in the third quarter of fiscal 2002 were $43.0 million, a decrease of 28.5% from the $60.1 million recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2001 and an increase of 2.2% from the $42.1 million recorded in the prior quarter. For the
nine months ended June 30, 2002, total revenues were $124.3 million, a 64.2% decrease from the $347.0 million recorded in the nine months ended June 30, 2001. The decrease in revenue in the third quarter of fiscal 2002 from the third quarter of
fiscal 2001 was due to continued adverse market conditions and the sharp reduction in demand for our existing products from our communications customers over the past year due to a faster shift in technology away from the internal manufacturing
process towards advanced CMOS-based processes and a slower than previously expected trend in the outsourcing of products to semiconductor vendors such as the Company. The increase in the current quarter revenue from the prior quarter revenue was due
to a slight improvement in demand for products targeting the storage industry.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues as a percentage of total revenues in the third quarter of fiscal 2002 was 96.5% compared to
134.8% in the third quarter of fiscal 2001 and 53.8% in the prior quarter. In the quarters ended June 30, 2002 and June 30, 2001 continued industry-wide reduction in capital spending and the resulting decrease in demand for our products resulted in
significant adjustments to reduce sales forecasts. As a result, for the quarters ended June 30, 2002 and June 30, 2001 we recorded a charge of $18.5 million and $50.6 million, respectively, for the write off of excess and obsolete inventories in
accordance with the Companys inventory reserve methodology. Excluding the inventory write offs, cost of revenues in the third quarter of fiscal 2002 and 2001 would have been $23.0 million, or 53.5% of revenues, and $30.5 million or 50.6% or
revenues, respectively. The increase in cost of revenues as a percentage of total revenues, exclusive of write down, from the third quarter of fiscal 2001, is the result of significantly lower quarterly revenues on a base of relatively fixed
manufacturing costs, and the introduction of new products which generally have lower yields when first released. The slight improvement to 53.5% in the current quarter from 53.8% in the prior quarter is the result of our continued efforts to
decrease costs and improve manufacturing yields for mature products as well as products within our optical systems division. We anticipate that cost of revenues as a percentage of total revenues will continue to fluctuate in the near term based
primarily on the demand for our products.
Engineering, Research and Development Costs
Engineering, research and development expenses were $41.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2002 compared to $37.2 million
in the third quarter of fiscal 2001 and $44.3 million in the prior quarter. For the nine months ended June 30, 2002, engineering, research and development expenses were $130.7 million compared to $108.9 million in the nine months ended June 30,
2001. As a percentage of total revenues, engineering, research and development expenses were 96.0% in the third quarter of fiscal 2002, 61.8% in the third quarter of fiscal 2001, and 105.3% in the prior quarter. For the nine months ended June 30,
2002, engineering, research and development expenses as a percentage of total revenues increased to 105.2% from 31.4%, in the comparable period a year ago. The increase in absolute dollars from the third quarter of fiscal
15
2001 was principally due to increased headcount from acquisitions completed in fiscal 2001 of
approximately 240 employees, amortization of deferred stock compensation and higher costs to support our continuing efforts to develop new products. The decrease from the prior quarter was the result of continued efforts to streamline our cost
structure. We expect these expenses to decrease slightly in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002 when compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2002, as a result of the restructuring plan announced in the third quarter of fiscal 2002. Our engineering,
research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) were $19.6 million in the third quarter of 2002,
compared to $23.8 million in the third quarter of 2001, and $17.0 million in the prior quarter. For the nine months ended June 30, 2002, SG&A expenses were $54.1 million compared to $59.7 million, in the comparable period a year ago. As a
percentage of total revenues, SG&A expenses were 45.6% in the third quarter of 2002, compared to 39.6% in the third quarter of 2001 and 40.5% in the prior quarter. For the nine months ended June 30, 2002, SG&A expenses as a percentage of
total revenues increased to 43.5% from 17.2%, in the comparable period a year ago. In absolute dollars, SG&A expenses in the third quarter of fiscal 2002 decreased compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2001 primarily due to our efforts to
streamline our cost structure. SG&A expenses increased from the prior quarter primarily due to an increase in the reserve for doubtful accounts.
Restructuring Costs
In the first quarter of fiscal 2002,
the Company announced a restructuring plan as a result of the continued decrease in demand for its products, a shift in the industrys technology and the need to align its cost structure with significantly reduced revenue levels. In the third
quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company announced additional steps to restructure its operations as a result of continued adverse business conditions, a faster shift in technology away from its internal manufacturing process towards advanced outsourced
CMOS-based processes, and a slower than previously expected trend in the outsourcing of products to semiconductor vendors such as the Company. This restructuring plan included the termination of certain product lines, curtailment of certain research
and development projects, a resulting workforce reduction, and the consolidation of excess facilities. In connection with this restructuring the Company also wrote down certain fixed assets which were deemed to be impaired, and accrued costs
associated with anticipated excess non-cancelable equipment and software contracts. Restructuring costs of $144.9 million and $209.5 million were recognized in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2002, respectively.
Workforce reduction includes the cost of severance and related benefits of 130 employees affected by the November 2001 restructuring. The
termination of these employees was completed in the March 31, 2002 quarter. In July 2002, the Company reduced its workforce by approximately 183 employees. The severance expense for this reduction will be recorded in the quarter ended September 30,
2002.
The excess facilities charge includes lease termination payments, non-cancelable lease costs and write off
of leasehold improvements and office equipment related to these leases. The consolidation of our excess facilities resulted in charges of $3.4 million and $3.9 million in the
16
three and nine months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. These costs will be paid over the respective
lease terms through May 2003.
The impairment of assets charge includes the write down of certain excess
manufacturing equipment, including fabrication and test equipments, and prepaid maintenance contracts associated with that equipment. This charge also included the write off of certain software licenses under non-cancelable agreements associated
with research and development employment positions which were eliminated as a result of the cancellation of non-strategic and unprofitable projects. The impairment of assets resulted in charges of $107.2 million and $170.4 million in the three and
nine months ended June 30, 2002, respectively.
Contract settlements costs represent fixed costs of non-cancelable
equipment and software contracts. The Company recorded a charge of $34.2 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2002 for the accrual of non-cancelable equipment and software contracts. These amounts will be paid out over the respective contract terms
through fiscal 2005.
In the quarter ended June 30, 2001, the Company implemented a similar restructuring plan due
to the sharp decline in demand for its products resulting in a charge of $2.5 million, and an additional charge of $1.2 million recorded in the quarter ended September 30, 2001. There remained an accrued restructuring balance of $2.9 million as of
September 30, 2001. In the nine months ended June 30, 2002, the Companys activities related to the 2001 restructuring accrual resulted in cash payments of approximately $0.7 million and non-cash charges of approximately $0.8 million.
Goodwill and Intangible Asset Impairment Charge
As a result of industry conditions, and our significant reorganization and restructuring charge discussed above, we determined that there were indicators of
impairment to the carrying value of our goodwill and purchased intangibles. During the third quarter of fiscal 2002, we performed a review of the value of our goodwill in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS 142). Based on our review, we recorded a charge of $396.0 million to write down the value of goodwill, and $7 million to write down the value of definite lived intangible assets during the quarter ended June 30, 2002.
We are required to perform goodwill impairment tests on an annual basis and between annual tests in certain circumstances. Future goodwill
impairment tests may result in charges to earnings. For additional information regarding SFAS 142, see Note 2 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets of the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed, Consolidated Financial Statements.
Amortization of Goodwill and Intangible Assets
We have elected to adopt SFAS No.142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, effective the beginning of fiscal 2002. In accordance with SFAS 142, we ceased amortizing
goodwill as of October 1, 2001. There was no transitional impairment of goodwill upon adoption of Statement 142.
17
Amortization of other intangible assets was $3.0 million in the third quarter of
fiscal 2002, compared to $20.5 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2001 and $3.1 million in the prior quarter. For the nine months ended June 30, 2002, amortization of other intangible assets was $9.3 million compared to $61.7 million in the
comparable period a year ago. The decrease in the amortization of other intangible assets was due to the adoption of Statement 142 as of October 1, 2001.
Interest Income and Interest Expense
Interest income was
$3.9 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2001 compared to $11.4 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2001 and $4.8 million in the prior quarter. The decrease in interest income of $7.5 million and $1.0 million from the quarters ended June 30,
2001 and March 31, 2002, respectively, was the result of lower cash, short term and long term investments held throughout the quarter as well as a significant decline in interest rates paid on our cash balances. The decrease in cash balances was
primarily the result of the purchase of our convertible subordinated debentures in the quarters ended September 30, 2001 and December 31, 2001, as well as a fixed operating cash outflow in a period of reduced revenues.
Interest expense was $3.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2002 compared to $7.8 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2001 and
$3.9 million in the prior quarter. The decrease in interest expense of $4.5 million from the quarter ended June 30, 2001, was primarily the result of the interest rate swap agreement we entered into during the December 2001 quarter which relieved
interest expense by $3.6 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2002. The decrease in interest expense of $0.6 million from the prior quarter was primarily due to a decrease in interest rates, and the movement of cash from higher interest
bearing long-term investments, to short-term investments or cash equivalents.
As a result of the interest rate
swap agreement, we expect to record lower interest expense in future periods to the extent the variable rate is lower than the fixed rate of our debentures and to the extent that we repurchase any additional debentures. However, to the extent the
adjustable rate is higher than the fixed rate of our debentures, our interest expense would be higher. For additional information regarding the interest rate swap agreement, see Note 6 Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities of the
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
Year to date income tax expense is $119.7 compared to tax benefit of $14.3 million for the same period in the
prior year. For the quarter ended June 30, 2002, the income tax expense was $126.2 million compared to a benefit of $48.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2001. The increase in tax expense for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2002 was
due to net tax charge of $126.2 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2002, consisting of an increase to the valuation allowance of $145.8, partially offset by the reversal of income taxes payable of $19.6 million, resulting in an income tax
receivable of $5.2 million. Management continually evaluates our deferred tax asset as to whether it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized. In the evaluation of the realizability of deferred tax assets,
the Company considers projections of future taxable income and the reversal of temporary differences. In its most recent evaluation, management has determined that it is not more likely than not that all of the
18
deferred tax assets will be realized. Accordingly, a valuation reserve has been recorded against the
entire net deferred tax assets.
Extraordinary Gain on Extinguishment of Debt
In October and November 2001, we purchased $83.3 million aggregate principal amount of our 4% convertible subordinated
debentures due March 2005 at prevailing market prices, for an aggregate of approximately $65.1 million. As a result, we recorded an extraordinary gain on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $10.5 million, net of income taxes of $6.6
million and a proportion of debt issue costs of $1.1 million, in the quarter ended December 31, 2001.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Operating Activities
We used $79.2 million and generated $25.7 million from operating activities in the nine months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The decrease in cash flow from
operations was principally due to a decrease in revenue over a relatively fixed cost structure.
Investing
Activities
We generated $256.2 million and used $170.0 million in investing activities during the nine months
ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The cash generated in investing activities during the first nine months of fiscal 2002 was due to the maturity of net investments of $318.0 million in held to maturity debt and equity securities. This was
offset by the use of $57.2 million for capital expenditures and $4.6 million for payments of collateral on equipment lease recorded in restricted long-term deposits.
Financing Activities
We used
$61.4 million and $28.9 million in financing activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Financing activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2002, represent the purchase of $83.3 million carrying value of our
convertible subordinated debentures for $65.1 million, the repayment of debt obligations of $0.3 million, and the repayment of $0.5 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2002 to venture fund partners for the sale of investments. This was slightly
offset by proceeds of $4.3 million received from the issuance and sale of common stock pursuant to our stock option and stock purchase plans and proceeds of $0.1 million received from the limited partners of the Vitesse venture funds.
Management believes that our cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and cash flow from operations are adequate to
finance our planned growth and operating needs for the next 12 months.
19
Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144), which
supersedes both SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of (SFAS 121) and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operations
Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions (Opinion 30), for the disposal of a segment of a business (as previously defined in that Opinion).
SFAS 144 retains the fundamental provisions in SFAS 121 for recognizing and measuring impairment losses on long-lived assets held for use and long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, while also resolving significant implementation issues
associated with SFAS 121. For example, SFAS 144 provides guidance on how a long-lived asset that is used as part of a group should be evaluated for impairment, establishes criteria for when a long-lived asset is held for sale and prescribes the
accounting for long-lived asset that will be disposed of other than by sale. SFAS 144 retains the basic provisions of Opinion 30 on how to present discontinued operations in the income statement but broadens that presentation to include a component
of an entity (rather than a segment of a business).
We are required to adopt SFAS 144 no later than fiscal 2003,
and plan to adopt its provisions for the quarter ending December 31, 2002. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 144 for long-lived assets held for use to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements because the impairment
assessment under SFAS 144 is largely unchanged from SFAS 121. The provisions of the Statement for assets held for sale or other disposal generally are required to be applied prospectively after the adoption date to newly initiated disposal
activities. Therefore, we cannot determine the potential effects that adoption of SFAS 144 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
Factors That May Affect Future Operating Results
We have experienced
continuing losses from operations since March 31, 2001, and We Expect That Our Operating Results Will Fluctuate in The Future Due to Reduced Demand in Our Markets
Since our quarterly revenues and earnings per share (excluding acquisition related and non-recurring charges) peaked in the quarter ended December 31, 2000, our revenues
have declined substantially and we have experienced continuing losses from operations. While our revenues have improved slightly in the quarters ended June 30, 2002, March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, they are still not sufficient to cover our
operating expenses. Further, in the third and first quarters of fiscal 2002 our operating results were materially adversely affected by an inventory write-down, restructuring charges and impairment charges. If we are required to take additional
charges such as these in the future, the adverse effect on our operating results may again be material. Due to general economic conditions and slowdowns in purchases of networking equipment, it has become increasingly difficult for us to predict the
purchasing activities of our customers and we expect that our operating results will fluctuate substantially in the future. In particular, we expect our revenues to be lower and loss per share to be greater for fiscal 2002 than in fiscal 2001. We
cannot predict when we will again achieve profitability, if at all. Future fluctuations in operating results may also be caused by a number of factors, many of which are
20
outside our control. Additional factors that could affect our future operating results include the
following:
|
|
|
The loss of major customers; |
|
|
|
Variations, delays or cancellations of orders and shipments of our products; |
|
|
|
Reduction in the selling prices of our products; |
|
|
|
Significant changes in the type and mix of products being sold; |
|
|
|
Delays in introducing new products; |
|
|
|
Design changes made by our customers; |
|
|
|
Our failure to manufacture and ship products on time; |
|
|
|
Changes in manufacturing capacity, the utilization of this capacity and manufacturing yields; |
|
|
|
Variations in product and process development costs; |
|
|
|
Changes in inventory levels; and |
|
|
|
Expenses or operational disruptions resulting from acquisitions. |
In the quarter ended June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, we implemented cost reductions. However, for the remainder of fiscal 2002, we do not expect that these measures
will be sufficient to offset lower revenues, and as such, we expect to continue to incur net losses. In the past, we have recorded significant new product and process development costs because our policy is to expense these costs at the time that
they are incurred. We may incur these types of expenses in the future. These additional expenses will have a material and adverse effect on our results in future periods. The occurrence of any of the above-mentioned factors could have a material
adverse effect on our business and on our financial results.
The Market Price for Our Common
Stock Has Been Volatile and Future Volatility Could Cause the Value of Your Investment in Our Company to Decline.
Our stock price has experienced significant volatility recently. In particular, our stock price declined significantly in the context of announcements made by us and other semiconductor suppliers of reduced revenue expectations and
of a general slowdown in the technology sector, particularly the optical networking equipment sector. Given these general economic conditions and the reduced demands for our products that we have experienced recently, we expect that our stock price
will continue to be volatile. In addition, the value of your investment could decline due to the impact of any of the following factors, among others, upon the market price of our common stock:
|
|
|
Additional changes in financial analysts estimates of our revenues and operating results; |
|
|
|
Our failure to meet financial analysts performance expectations; and |
|
|
|
Changes in market valuations of other companies in the semiconductor or networking industries. |
In addition, many of the risks described elsewhere in this section could materially and adversely affect our stock price, as discussed in
those risk factors. The stock markets have recently experienced substantial price and volume volatility. Fluctuations such as these have affected and are likely to continue to affect the market price of our common stock.
In the past, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility and decline in
the market price of such companies securities. If instituted against us, regardless of the outcome, such litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of our managements attention and resources and have a material adverse
effect on
21
our business, financial condition and results of operations. We could be required to pay substantial
damages, including punitive damages, if we were to lose such a lawsuit.
If We are Unable to
Develop and Introduce New Products Successfully or to Achieve Market Acceptance of Our New Products, Our Operating Results would be Adversely Affected.
Our future success will depend on our ability to develop new high-performance integrated circuits and optical modules for existing and new markets, introduce these products in a cost-effective and
timely manner and convince leading equipment manufacturers to select these products for design into their own new products. Our quarterly results in the past have been, and are expected in the future to continue to be, dependent on the introduction
of a relatively small number of new products and the timely completion and delivery of those products to customers. The development of new integrated circuits is highly complex, and from time to time we have experienced delays in completing the
development and introduction of new products. In addition, we only introduced optical modules since our acquisition of Versatile Optical Networks, Inc., in July 2001, and have only begun to see significant sales of these products in the last two
quarters. Our ability to develop and deliver new products successfully will depend on various factors, including our ability to:
|
|
|
Accurately predict market requirements and evolving industry standards; |
|
|
|
Accurately define new products; |
|
|
|
Timely complete and introduce new products; |
|
|
|
Timely qualify and obtain industry interoperability certification of our products and our customers products into which our products will be incorporated;
|
|
|
|
Achieve high manufacturing yields; and |
|
|
|
Gain market acceptance of our products and our customers products. |
If we are not able to develop and introduce new products successfully, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be materially and adversely
affected.
We are Dependent on a Small Number of Customers in a Few Industries
We intend to continue focusing our sales effort on a small number of customers in the communications and test
equipment markets that require high-performance integrated circuits. Some of these customers are also our competitors. For the nine months ended June 30, 2002, no single customer accounted for greater than 10% of total revenues. If any of our
major customers delays orders of our products or stops buying our products, our business and financial condition would be severely affected.
There Are Risks Associated with Recent and Future Acquisitions
Since the beginning of fiscal 2000, we made four significant acquisitions. In March 2000, we completed the acquisition of Orologic, Inc. (Orologic) in exchange for approximately 4.5 million shares of our common stock. In
May 2000, we completed the acquisition of SiTera Incorporated (SiTera) for approximately 14.7 million shares of our common stock. In June 2001, we acquired Exbit Technology A/S (Exbit) for up to approximately 4.1 million
shares of our common stock and may be required to issue an additional 2.4 million shares upon the attainment of certain internal future retention and performance goals. In July 2001, we completed the acquisition of Versatile Optical Networks, Inc.
(Versatile) for approximately 8.8 million shares of our common stock. Also since the beginning of fiscal 2000, we completed four smaller acquisitions for an aggregate of approximately $61.7 million consisting of approximately 0.8
22
million shares of common stock issued and stock options assumed and approximately $44.6 million in cash.
These acquisitions may result in the diversion of managements attention from the day-to-day operations of the Companys business. Risks of making these acquisitions include difficulties in the integration of acquired operations, products
and personnel. If we fail in our efforts to integrate recent and future acquisitions, our business and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.
Our management frequently evaluates strategic opportunities available. In the future, we may pursue additional acquisitions of complementary products, technologies or
businesses. Acquisitions we make in the future could result in dilutive issuances of equity securities, substantial debt and amortization expenses related to intangible assets. In particular, in connection with our acquisition of Orologic, we were
required to record an IPR&D charge of $45.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2000. In addition, under the new FASB Standard No.142, which we adopted as of October 1, 2001, certain intangible assets relating to acquired businesses,
including goodwill, are maintained on the balance sheet rather than being amortized. These assets must be periodically tested for impairment, and in the three months ended June 30, 2002, we were required to record impairment charges of $403 million
associated with goodwill and other intangible assets related to past acquisitions. As of June 30, 2002 and after accounting for these impairment charges, we have an aggregate of $181.7 million of goodwill and other intangible assets on our balance
sheet. These assets may eventually be written down to the extent they are deemed to be impaired and any such write-downs would adversely affect our results.
Our Industry is Highly Competitive
The markets for our products are intensely competitive and subject to rapid technological advancement in design tools, wafer-manufacturing techniques, process tools and alternate networking technologies. We must identify and
capture future market opportunities to offset the rapid price erosion that characterizes our industry. We may not be able to develop new products at competitive pricing and performance levels. Even if we are able to do so, we may not complete a new
product and introduce it to market in a timely manner. Our customers may substitute use of our products in their next generation equipment with those of current or future competitors. Our competitors include Agere, Applied Micro Circuits
Corporation, Broadcom, Conexant Systems, IBM, Intel, Infineon, and PMC Sierra. We also compete with internal ASIC design units of systems companies such as Cisco and Nortel. Over the next few years, we expect additional competitors, some of which
may have greater financial and other resources, to enter the market with new products. In addition, we are aware of venture-backed companies that focus on specific portions of our product line. These companies, individually or collectively, could
represent future competition for many design wins and subsequent product sales.
We typically face competition at
the design stage, where customers evaluate alternative design approaches that require integrated circuits. Our competitors have increasingly frequent opportunities to supplant our products in next generation systems because of shortened product life
and design-in cycles in many of our customers products.
Competition is particularly strong in the market
for optical networking chips, in part due to the markets past growth rate, which attracts larger competitors, and in part due to the number of smaller companies focused on this area. These companies, individually and collectively, represent
strong competition for many design wins and subsequent product sales. Larger
23
competitors in our market have acquired both publicly traded and privately held companies with avanced technologies. These acquisitions could
enhance the ability of larger competitors to obtain new business that Vitesse might have otherwise won.
There are Risks Associated with Doing Business in Foreign Countries
In fiscal 2001,
international sales accounted for 23%, of our total revenues, and we expect international sales to constitute a substantial portion of our total revenues for the foreseeable future. International sales involve a variety of risks and uncertainties,
including risks related to:
|
|
|
Reliance on strategic alliance partners; |
|
|
|
Compliance with foreign regulatory requirements; |
|
|
|
Variability of foreign economic conditions; |
|
|
|
Changing restrictions imposed by U.S. export laws; and |
|
|
|
Competition from U.S. based companies that have firmly established significant international operations. |
Failure to successfully address these risks and uncertainties could adversely affect our international sales, which could in turn have a
material and adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
We Must Keep
Pace with Product and Process Development and Technological Change
The market for our products is
characterized by rapid changes in both product and process technologies. We believe that our success to a large extent depends on our ability to continue to improve our product and process technologies and to develop new products and technologies in
order to maintain our competitive position. Further, we must adapt our products and processes to technological changes and adopt emerging industry standards. Our failure to accomplish any of the above could have a negative impact on our business and
financial results.
We Are Dependent on Key Suppliers
We manufacture our products using a variety of components procured from third-party suppliers. All of our high-performance integrated
circuits are packaged by third parties. Other components and materials used in our manufacturing process are available from only a limited number of sources. Further, we are increasingly relying on third-party semiconductor foundries for our supply
of silicon-based products. Any difficulty in obtaining sole- or limited-sourced parts or services from third parties could affect our ability to meet scheduled product deliveries to customers. This in turn could have a material adverse effect on our
customer relationships, business and financial results.
Our Manufacturing Yields Are Subject
to Fluctuation
Semiconductor fabrication is a highly complex and precise process. Defects in masks,
impurities in the materials used, contamination of the manufacturing environment and equipment failures can cause a large percentage of wafers or die to be rejected. Manufacturing yields vary among products, depending on a particular
high-performance integrated circuits complexity and on our experience in manufacturing it. In the past, we have experienced difficulties in achieving acceptable yields on some high-performance integrated circuits, which has led to shipment
delays. Our overall yields are lower than yields obtained in a mature silicon process because we manufacture a large number of different products in limited volume and our process technology
24
is less developed. We anticipate that many of our current and future products may never be produced in
volume.
Since a majority of our manufacturing costs are relatively fixed, maintaining a number of shippable die
per wafer is critical to our operating results. Yield decreases can result in higher unit costs and may adversely affect gross profit and net income. We use estimated yields for valuing work-in-process inventory. If actual yields are materially
different than these estimates, we may need to revalue work-in-process inventory. Consequently, if any of our current or future products experience yield problems, our financial results may be adversely affected.
Our Business Is Subject to Environmental Regulations
We are subject to various governmental regulations related to toxic, volatile and other hazardous chemicals used in our manufacturing process. If we fail to comply with
these regulations, this failure could result in the imposition of fines or in the suspension or cessation of our operations. Additionally, we may be restricted in our ability to expand operations at our present locations or we may be required to
incur significant expenses to comply with these regulations.
Our Failure to Manage Growth of Operations May
Adversely Affect Us
The management of our growth requires qualified personnel, systems and other resources.
We have recently established several product design centers worldwide and have acquired Orologic in March 2000, SiTera in May 2000, Exbit in June 2001, Versatile in July 2001 and completed seven other smaller acquisitions since the fall of 1998. We
have only limited experience in integrating the operations of acquired businesses. Failure to manage our growth or to successfully integrate new and future facilities or newly acquired businesses could have a material adverse effect on our business
and financial results.
We Are Dependent on Key Personnel
Due to the specialized nature of our business, our success depends in part upon attracting and retaining the services of qualified
managerial and technical personnel. The competition for qualified personnel is intense. The loss of any of our key employees or the failure to hire additional skilled technical personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business and
financial results.
Our Ability to Repurchase Our Debentures, If Required, with Cash, upon a
Change of Control May Be Limited
In certain circumstances involving a change of control or the termination of
public trading of our common stock, holders of our 4% convertible subordinated debentures may require us to repurchase some or all of the debentures. We cannot assure that we will have sufficient financial resources at such time or will be able to
arrange financing to pay the repurchase price of the debentures.
Our ability to repurchase the debentures in such
event may be limited by law, by the indenture, by the terms of other agreements relating to our senior debt and by such indebtedness and agreements as may be entered into, replaced, supplemented or amended from time to time. We may
25
be required to refinance our senior debt in order to make such payments. We may not have the financial
ability to repurchase the debentures if payment of our senior debt is accelerated.
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
In the normal course
of business, our operations are exposed to risks associated with fluctuations in interest rates. We address this risk through controlled risk management that includes the use of derivative financial instruments to economically hedge or reduce these
exposures. We do not enter into financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Our interest income,
interest expense and debt are sensitive to fluctuations in the general level of the U.S. interest rates. Changes in the U.S. interest rate affect the interest earned on our cash and cash equivalents, short-term and long-term investments, interest
expense on our debt as well as the fair value of debt.
To ensure the adequacy and effectiveness of our interest
rate hedge positions, we continually monitor our interest rate swap positions, both on a stand-alone basis and in conjunction with our underlying interest rate, from an accounting and economic perspective.
However, given the inherent limitations of forecasting and the anticipatory nature of the exposure intended to be hedged, there can be no
assurance that such programs will enable us to hedge more than a portion of the adverse financial impact resulting from unfavorable movements in interest rates. In addition, the timing of the accounting for recognition of gains and losses related to
the mark-to-market instruments for any given period may not coincide with the timing of the gains and losses related to the underlying economic exposures and, therefore, may adversely affect our consolidated operating results and financial position.
The gains and losses realized from the interest rate swap are recorded in Interest expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations.
For the quarter ended December 31, 2001, we entered into an interest rate swap which has been recorded at fair value as a derivative liability on our condensed consolidated
balance sheet at June 30, 2002. We entered into the agreement to reduce the impact of interest rate changes on our long-term debt. The swap agreement allows us to swap long-term borrowings at fixed rates into variable rates that are anticipated to
be lower than rates available to us. As a result, the swap effectively converts our fixed-rate debt to variable-rates and qualifies for hedge accounting treatment. Since this interest rate swap agreement qualifies as a fair value hedge under SFAS
No. 133, changes in the fair value of the swap agreement will be recorded as interest expense to the extent that such changes are effective and as long as the hedge requirements are met. Periodic interest payments and receipts on both the debt and
the swap agreement are recorded as components of interest expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations.
26
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2.
Changes in Securities
None.
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 6.
Exhibits & Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
|
99.1 |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
27
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION |
|
By: |
|
/s/ EUGENE F. HOVANEC
|
|
|
Eugene F. Hovanec |
|
|
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
August 13, 2002
28