UNITED STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
X | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended October 2, 2004 |
Commission File Number 1-7724 |
Snap-on Incorporated |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
Delaware | 39-0622040 |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) | |
10801 Corporate Drive, Pleasant Prairie, Wisconsin |
53158-1603 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (zip code) |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (262) 656-5200
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [_]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [X] No [_]
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
Class |
Outstanding at October 29, 2004 |
Common Stock, $1 par value | 57,539,316 shares |
Page | ||
Part I. Financial Information | ||
Item 1. |
Financial Statements | |
Consolidated Statements of Earnings - Three and Nine Months Ended | ||
October 2, 2004, and September 27, 2003 | 3 | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets - October 2, 2004, and January 3, 2004 | 4-5 | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Nine Months Ended | ||
October 2, 2004, and September 27, 2003 | 6 | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 7-20 | |
Item 2. |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition | |
and Results of Operations | 21-35 | |
Item 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 36-37 |
Item 4. |
Controls and Procedures | 38-39 |
Part II. Other Information | ||
Item 1. |
Legal Proceedings | 40 |
Item 2. |
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 40-41 |
Item 6. |
Exhibits | 42 |
Signatures |
43 | |
Exhibit Index |
44 |
2
Three Months Ended |
Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||
October 2, 2004 |
September 27, 2003 |
October 2, 2004 |
September 27, 2003 | |||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 550.9 | $ | 525.6 | $ | 1,737.3 | $ | 1,633.9 | ||||||
Financial services revenue | 17.9 | -- | 59.9 | -- | ||||||||||
Total revenue | 568.8 | 525.6 | 1,797.2 | 1,633.9 | ||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | (311.5 | ) | (303.8 | ) | (992.7 | ) | (920.6 | ) | ||||||
Operating expenses | (220.8 | ) | (200.7 | ) | (700.2 | ) | (630.2 | ) | ||||||
Net finance income | -- | 10.0 | -- | 31.7 | ||||||||||
Operating earnings | 36.5 | 31.1 | 104.3 | 114.8 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | (6.1 | ) | (5.8 | ) | (17.4 | ) | (18.2 | ) | ||||||
Other income (expense) - net | (0.8 | ) | (2.4 | ) | (3.6 | ) | (6.5 | ) | ||||||
Earnings before income taxes | 29.6 | 22.9 | 83.3 | 90.1 | ||||||||||
Income taxes | 6.8 | 5.2 | 25.6 | 28.7 | ||||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 22.8 | $ | 17.7 | $ | 57.7 | $ | 61.4 | ||||||
Net earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 1.00 | $ | 1.05 | ||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.99 | $ | 1.05 | ||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding: | ||||||||||||||
Basic | 57.7 | 58.3 | 57.9 | 58.2 | ||||||||||
Effect of dilutive options | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.2 | ||||||||||
Diluted | 58.2 | 58.4 | 58.5 | 58.4 | ||||||||||
Dividends declared per common share | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.75 | ||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
October 2, 2004 |
January 3, 2004 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current Assets | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 153.3 | $ | 96.1 | ||||
Accounts receivable - net of allowances | 527.5 | 546.8 | ||||||
Inventories | ||||||||
Finished goods | 316.5 | 305.7 | ||||||
Work in process | 39.9 | 46.5 | ||||||
Raw materials | 69.6 | 80.7 | ||||||
Excess of current cost over LIFO cost | (80.7 | ) | (81.8 | ) | ||||
Total inventories | 345.3 | 351.1 | ||||||
Deferred income tax benefits | 75.2 | 71.4 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 80.4 | 66.3 | ||||||
Total current assets | 1,181.7 | 1,131.7 | ||||||
Property and equipment | ||||||||
Land | 24.9 | 26.9 | ||||||
Buildings and improvements | 214.4 | 217.8 | ||||||
Machinery and equipment | 569.8 | 580.4 | ||||||
809.1 | 825.1 | |||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (507.0 | ) | (496.5 | ) | ||||
Property and equipment - net | 302.1 | 328.6 | ||||||
Deferred income tax benefits | 10.7 | 16.1 | ||||||
Goodwill | 411.2 | 417.6 | ||||||
Other intangibles - net | 67.6 | 69.5 | ||||||
Other assets | 177.2 | 175.0 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 2,150.5 | $ | 2,138.5 | ||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
October 2, 2004 |
January 3, 2004 | |||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |
||||||||
Current Liabilities | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 200.8 | $ | 189.7 | ||||
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt | 28.3 | 30.2 | ||||||
Accrued benefits | 33.6 | 35.3 | ||||||
Accrued compensation | 51.9 | 49.2 | ||||||
Dealer deposits | 44.4 | 49.9 | ||||||
Deferred subscription revenue | 23.0 | 20.6 | ||||||
Income taxes | 24.2 | 20.1 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities | 151.5 | 172.2 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 557.7 | 567.2 | ||||||
Long-term debt | 303.5 | 303.0 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 46.7 | 34.3 | ||||||
Retiree health care benefits | 90.2 | 89.3 | ||||||
Pension liabilities | 84.6 | 74.2 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 65.7 | 59.6 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 1,148.4 | 1,127.6 | ||||||
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||
Preferred stock - authorized 15,000,000 shares | ||||||||
of $1 par value; none outstanding | -- | -- | ||||||
Common stock - authorized 250,000,000 shares | ||||||||
of $1 par value; issued 66,992,505 and 66,956,246 shares | 67.0 | 67.0 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 79.9 | 94.5 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 1,099.0 | 1,084.7 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | 32.6 | 38.6 | ||||||
Grantor stock trust at fair market value - 4,605,838 | ||||||||
and 5,007,809 shares | (132.3 | ) | (159.2 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock at cost - 4,674,764 and 3,774,764 shares | (144.1 | ) | (114.7 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders' equity | 1,002.1 | 1,010.9 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 2,150.5 | $ | 2,138.5 | ||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
October 2, 2004 |
September 27, 2003 | |||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 57.7 | $ | 61.4 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash | ||||||||
provided (used) by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation | 46.1 | 41.9 | ||||||
Amortization of other intangibles | 2.0 | 1.6 | ||||||
Deferred income tax provision (benefit) | 8.6 | (5.2 | ) | |||||
(Gain) loss on sale of assets | (1.1 | ) | -- | |||||
(Gain) loss on mark-to-market for cash flow hedges | 1.3 | 0.8 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of | ||||||||
effects of acquisitions: | ||||||||
(Increase) decrease in receivables | 38.5 | 27.7 | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in inventories | 1.3 | 29.5 | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in prepaid and other assets | (5.9 | ) | (23.0 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable | 3.7 | (2.9 | ) | |||||
Increase (decrease) in accruals and other liabilities | (18.0 | ) | 8.2 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 134.2 | 140.0 | ||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
Capital expenditures | (25.9 | ) | (18.7 | ) | ||||
Acquisitions of businesses - net of cash acquired | -- | 0.1 | ||||||
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment | 11.3 | 4.0 | ||||||
Proceeds from disposition of business | 0.6 | -- | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (14.0 | ) | (14.6 | ) | ||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
Payment of long-term debt | (0.3 | ) | (0.2 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in short-term borrowings | (2.0 | ) | (22.8 | ) | ||||
Purchase of treasury stock | (29.4 | ) | (8.1 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from stock purchase and option plans | 12.4 | 7.8 | ||||||
Proceeds from termination of interest rate swap agreement | -- | 5.1 | ||||||
Cash dividends paid | (43.4 | ) | (43.6 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (62.7 | ) | (61.8 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (0.3 | ) | 3.4 | |||||
Increase in cash and cash equivalents | 57.2 | 67.0 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 96.1 | 18.4 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 153.3 | $ | 85.4 | ||||
Supplemental cash flow disclosures: | ||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 22.0 | $ | 19.3 | ||||
Cash paid for income taxes | $ | 4.5 | $ | 13.3 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
6
1. | This report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Snap-on Incorporateds (Snap-on or the company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2004. |
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Snap-on and its majority-owned subsidiaries and do not include the accounts of the companys independent dealers. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current-year presentation. |
During the third quarter of 2004, Snap-on realigned certain of its business units within its reportable business segments. Prior year financial data by segment has been restated to reflect the reportable business segment realignments. Refer to Note 14 for information on Snap-ons business segments. |
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments, including adjustments related to the companys adoption of the Financial Accounting Standards Boards (FASB) interpretation (FIN) No. 46R, as discussed in Note 2 below), necessary to a fair statement of financial condition and results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2004, have been made. Management also believes that the results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2004, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year. |
2. | The FASB issued FIN No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (an interpretation of ARB No. 51) in December 2003, which became effective for Snap-on at the beginning of its 2004 fiscal year. FIN No. 46R provides consolidation guidance regarding the identification of variable interest entities (VIE) for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights. FIN No. 46R provides guidance in determining if a business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE and whether or not that business enterprise should consolidate the VIE for financial reporting purposes. |
Based on the companys analysis of FIN No. 46R, the company concluded that Snap-on would consolidate Snap-on Credit LLC (SOC) as of January 4, 2004, the beginning of Snap-ons 2004 fiscal year. Snap-on previously accounted for SOC, a 50%-owned joint venture with The CIT Group, Inc. (CIT), using the equity method. Snap-on has consolidated SOC on a prospective basis and, as such, has not restated previously issued financial statements. The impact of the consolidation of SOC on Snap-ons consolidated balance sheet was not significant. As a result of the consolidation of SOC in fiscal 2004, Snap-on is reporting the results of its finance operations as a new business segment, Financial Services. See Note 14 for further discussion of Snap-ons business segments. |
SOC, which commenced operations on January 3, 1999, provides a broad range of financial services to Snap-ons U.S. dealer and customer network and to Snap-ons industrial and other customers. As a result of establishing SOC, Snap-on effectively outsourced to SOC its domestic captive credit function. Snap-on and CIT have identical voting and participation rights and responsibilities in SOC. Snap-on receives royalty and management fee income from SOC based on the volume of financings originated by SOC. Snap-on also shares with CIT in any residual net profit or loss of the joint venture after operating expenses, including royalty and management fees, interest costs and credit loss provisions. |
7
SOC sells substantially all of its originated contracts (through asset-securitization transactions) on a limited recourse basis to CIT, net of certain fees. SOC continues to service these contracts for an estimated market-rate servicing fee. SOC originated contracts totaling $109.1 million and $358.7 million during the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2004. |
Snap-on has credit risk exposure for certain SOC-originated contracts with recourse provisions against Snap-on. At October 2, 2004, and January 3, 2004, $9.5 million and $14.1 million of loans, with terms ranging from six months to ten years, have a primary recourse provision to Snap-on if the loans become more than 90 days past due. The asset value of the collateral underlying these recourse loans would serve to mitigate Snap-ons loss in the event of default. The estimated fair value of the guarantees for all loan originations with recourse as of October 2, 2004, was not material. |
CIT and Snap-on have agreed to lend funds to support SOCs working capital requirements on a 50/50 basis, with a combined maximum borrowing limit not to exceed $24 million. As of October 2, 2004, SOC owed Snap-on $0.3 million pursuant to this agreement. |
Snap-ons exposure related to SOC as of October 2, 2004, was its $7.0 million investment and the $0.3 million loan plus the recourse obligations on customer financings, which are discussed above. CITs investment of $7.0 million as of October 2, 2004, is included in Other long-term liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
3. | Accounts receivable include trade accounts, installment and other receivables, including the current portion of dealer financing receivables. The components of Snap-ons current accounts receivable were as follows: |
(Amounts in millions) | October 2, 2004 |
January 3, 2004 | ||||||
Trade accounts receivable | $ | 484.0 | $ | 501.8 | ||||
Installment receivables, net of unearned finance | ||||||||
charges of $12.2 million and $11.4 million | 46.4 | 55.1 | ||||||
Other accounts receivable | 40.0 | 34.9 | ||||||
Total | 570.4 | 591.8 | ||||||
Allowances for doubtful accounts | (42.9 | ) | (45.0 | ) | ||||
Total accounts receivable - net | $ | 527.5 | $ | 546.8 | ||||
The long-term portion of accounts receivable is classified in Other assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and is comprised of installment and other receivables, including dealer financing receivables, with payment terms that are due beyond one year. The components of Snap-ons long-term accounts receivable were as follows: |
8
(Amounts in millions) | October 2, 2004 |
January 3, 2004 | ||||||
Installment receivables, net of unearned finance | ||||||||
charges of $7.4 million and $9.1 million | $ | 48.0 | $ | 41.9 | ||||
Other long-term accounts receivable | 20.2 | 19.8 | ||||||
Total | $ | 68.2 | $ | 61.7 | ||||
4. | Disclosures related to acquired intangible assets are as follows: |
October 2, 2004 |
January 3, 2004 | |||||||||||||
(Amounts in millions) | Gross Carrying Value |
Accumulated Amortization |
Gross Carrying Value |
Accumulated Amortization | ||||||||||
Amortized | ||||||||||||||
intangible assets: | ||||||||||||||
Trademarks | $ | 2.7 | $ | (0.5 | ) | $ | 2.7 | $ | (0.4 | ) | ||||
Patents | 32.6 | (13.0 | ) | 32.3 | (11.3 | ) | ||||||||
Total | 35.3 | (13.5 | ) | 35.0 | (11.7 | ) | ||||||||
Unamortized | ||||||||||||||
intangible assets: | ||||||||||||||
Trademarks | 45.8 | -- | 46.2 | -- | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 81.1 | $ | (13.5 | ) | $ | 81.2 | $ | (11.7 | ) | ||||
The weighted-average amortization period is 35 years for trademarks and 16 years for patents. The weighted-average amortization period for trademarks and patents on a combined basis is 19 years. |
Amortization expense was $0.9 million and $2.0 million for the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2004, and $0.7 million and $1.6 million for the three and nine month periods ended September 27, 2003. Total estimated annual amortization expense expected for each of the next five fiscal years, based on current levels of intangible assets, is $2.6 million for 2004, $1.9 million for 2005, and $1.8 million for 2006, 2007 and 2008. |
Goodwill was $411.2 million and $417.6 million at October 2, 2004, and January 3, 2004. The decrease in goodwill reflects $4.5 million of currency translation and $1.9 million relating to the third-quarter 2004 finalization of purchase accounting for a prior acquisition and the second-quarter 2004 sale of a business. |
5. | During the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2004, Snap-on recorded costs associated with exit or disposal activities (restructuring costs) of $3.9 million and $18.6 million, including charges of $2.6 million and $15.0 million that are included in Cost of goods sold and charges of $1.3 million and $3.6 million that are included in Operating expenses on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Of the $3.9 million of restructuring costs recorded during the third quarter of 2004, $1.2 million qualified as restructuring accruals and $2.7 million was expensed as incurred. |
9
Restructuring costs incurred in the third quarter of 2004 primarily related to the closure of a German hand-tool plant that was consolidated into the companys Spanish operation; the elimination of one plant in Spain through further consolidation; the movement of production of certain saw products from the United Kingdom to Eastern Europe; the phase out of production at two U.S. hand-tool manufacturing facilities in March 2004; and management realignment actions at various other Snap-on facilities. |
Snap-ons 2004 restructuring accrual activity for the quarter ended October 2, 2004, related to its 2004 actions was as follows: |
(Amounts in millions) | Balance at July 3, 2004 |
Provision |
Usage |
Balance at October 2, 2004 | ||||||||||
Severance costs: | ||||||||||||||
Commercial and | ||||||||||||||
Industrial Group | $ | 1.7 | $ | 1.2 | $ | (1.1 | ) | $ | 1.8 | |||||
Diagnostic and | ||||||||||||||
Information Group | 0.1 | -- | -- | 0.1 | ||||||||||
Facility consolidation | ||||||||||||||
or closure costs: | ||||||||||||||
Commercial and | ||||||||||||||
Industrial Group | -- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 1.8 | $ | 1.2 | $ | (1.1 | ) | $ | 1.9 | |||||
Restructuring accrual usage was $1.1 million for severance payments related to the separation of employees. Since year-end 2003, Snap-on has reduced headcount by 417 employees as part of its 2004 restructuring actions. Snap-on anticipates that the restructuring accrual recorded during the third quarter of 2004 will be fully utilized by the end of fiscal 2004. |
Snap-ons 2004 restructuring accrual activity for the quarter ended October 2, 2004, related to its 2003 actions was as follows: |
10
(Amounts in millions) | Balance at July 3, 2004 |
Provision |
Usage |
Balance at October 2, 2004 | ||||||||||
Severance costs: | ||||||||||||||
Snap-on Dealer Group | $ | 1.4 | $ | -- | $ | (0.5 | ) | $ | 0.9 | |||||
Commercial and | ||||||||||||||
Industrial Group | 0.3 | -- | (0.1 | ) | 0.2 | |||||||||
Diagnostic and | ||||||||||||||
Information Group | 0.1 | -- | -- | 0.1 | ||||||||||
Facility consolidation | ||||||||||||||
or closure costs: | ||||||||||||||
Diagnostic and | ||||||||||||||
Information Group | 0.1 | -- | (0.1 | ) | -- | |||||||||
Total | $ | 1.9 | $ | -- | $ | (0.7 | ) | $ | 1.2 | |||||
Restructuring accrual usage of $0.7 million in the third quarter of 2004 consisted of continuing severance payments related to the separation of employees. Since year-end 2003, Snap-on reduced headcount by 464 employees as part of its 2003 actions. Snap-on anticipates that the restructuring accrual related to its 2003 restructuring actions will be fully utilized by the end of fiscal 2004. |
Snap-on expects to fund the remaining cash requirements of its 2004 and 2003 restructuring activities with cash flows from operations and borrowings under the companys existing credit facilities. The specific restructuring measures and estimated costs were based on managements best business judgment under prevailing circumstances. Snap-on also expects that it will incur approximately $4 million of additional restructuring costs during the remainder of fiscal 2004. |
6. | Notes payable and long-term debt at October 2, 2004, and January 3, 2004, totaled $331.8 million and $333.2 million. Notes payable to banks under bank lines of credit totaled $3.0 million and $4.9 million at October 2, 2004, and January 3, 2004. At October 2, 2004, and January 3, 2004, Snap-on had commercial paper outstanding denominated in U.S. dollars of $25.0 million. |
On July 27, 2004, Snap-on entered into a five-year $400 million multi-currency revolving credit facility that terminates on July 27, 2009. This $400 million facility replaced Snap-ons $408 million of multi-currency revolving credit facilities. The $400 million revolving credit facilitys financial covenant requires that Snap-on maintain a ratio of total debt to the sum of total debt plus shareholders equity of not greater than 0.60 to 1.00. As of the filing date of this document, Snap-on believes it is in compliance with all covenants of this revolving credit facility. |
At October 2, 2004, Snap-on also had $20 million of unused committed bank lines of credit of which $10 million expires on July 31, 2005, and $10 million expires on August 31, 2005. |
7. | Snap-on uses derivative instruments to manage well-defined interest rate and foreign currency exposures. Snap-on does not use derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes. The criteria used to determine if hedge accounting treatment is appropriate are (i) the designation of the hedge to an underlying exposure, (ii) whether or not overall risk is being reduced, and (iii) if there is a correlation between the value of the derivative instrument and the underlying obligation. On the date a derivative contract is entered into, Snap-on designates the derivative as a fair value hedge, a cash flow hedge, a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation, or a natural hedging instrument whose change in fair value is recognized as an economic hedge against changes in the values of the hedged item. |
11
Foreign Currency Derivative Instruments: Snap-on has operations in a number of countries that have transactions outside their functional currencies and, as a result, is exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. In addition, Snap-on hedges the anticipated repayment of intercompany loans to foreign subsidiaries denominated in foreign currencies. Snap-on manages most of these exposures on a consolidated basis, which allows for netting of certain exposures to take advantage of natural offsets. Forward exchange contracts are used to hedge the net exposures. Gains or losses on net foreign currency hedges are intended to offset losses or gains on the underlying net exposures in an effort to reduce the earnings volatility resulting from fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates. |
At October 2, 2004, Snap-on had net outstanding foreign forward exchange contracts to sell $28.9 million comprised of buy contracts of $100.7 million in Swedish kronor, $17.0 million in Canadian dollars, $9.0 million in Australian dollars, $3.2 million in Taiwan dollars, $1.0 million in Swiss francs and $0.4 million in other buy contracts and sell contracts of $70.0 million in euros, $54.8 million in British pounds, $14.1 million in Singapore dollars, $5.4 million in Danish kronor, $4.9 million in Japanese yen, $3.6 million in Norwegian kronor, $3.1 million in Hungarian forints, $1.3 million in Polish zloty, $1.1 million in Mexican pesos and net sell contracts of $1.9 million in other currencies. At January 3, 2004, Snap-on had net outstanding foreign forward exchange contracts to sell $84.0 million comprised of buy contracts of $72.8 million in Swedish kronor, $3.2 million in Taiwan dollars and $0.6 million in other currencies and sell contracts of $72.8 million in euros, $43.3 million in British pounds, $11.8 million in Canadian dollars, $10.2 million in Japanese yen, $8.9 million in Singapore dollars, $5.7 million in Danish kronor, $4.3 million in Norwegian kronor, $2.3 million in Mexican pesos and $1.3 million in Australian dollars. |
The majority of Snap-ons forward exchange contracts are not designated as hedges. The fair value changes of these contracts are reported in earnings as foreign exchange gain or loss, which is included in Other income (expense) net on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Those forward exchange contracts that qualify for hedge accounting treatment are accounted for as cash flow hedges where the effective portion of the changes in fair value of the derivative is recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. When the hedged item is realized in income, the gain or loss included in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is reclassified to income in the same financial statement caption as the hedged item. The ineffective portion of changes in fair value of the cash flow hedges is reported in earnings as foreign exchange gain or loss, which is included in Other income (expense) net, and was not material for the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2004, and September 27, 2003. |
12
Interest Rate Swap Agreements: Snap-on enters into interest rate swap agreements to manage interest costs and risks associated with changing interest rates. Interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as either cash flow hedges or fair value hedges. The differentials paid or received on interest rate swap agreements are accrued and recognized as adjustments to interest expense. For fair value hedges, the effective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative is recorded in Long-term debt on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, while any ineffective portion is recorded as an adjustment to interest expense. For cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative is recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), while any ineffective portion is recorded as an adjustment to interest expense. The notional amount of interest rate swaps was $75.0 million at October 2, 2004, and January 3, 2004, and included $50.0 million of fair value hedges and $25.0 million of cash flow hedges. |
For all cash flow hedges qualifying for hedge accounting, the net accumulated derivative loss at October 2, 2004, was $0.2 million, after tax, and is reflected in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting are reflected as derivative assets or liabilities with the corresponding gains or losses reflected in earnings in the period of change. An offsetting gain or loss is also reflected in earnings based upon the changes of the fair value of the debt instrument being hedged. For all fair value hedges qualifying for hedge accounting, the net accumulated derivative loss at October 2, 2004, was $1.0 million. At October 2, 2004, the maximum maturity date of any cash flow hedge and fair value hedge was approximately one year and seven years, respectively. During the next 12 months, Snap-on expects to reclassify into earnings net gains from Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) of approximately $0.1 million after tax at the time the underlying hedged transactions are realized. During the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2004, cash flow hedge and fair value hedge ineffectiveness was not material. |
8. | Snap-ons pension expense included the following components: |
Three Months Ended |
Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||
(Amounts in millions) | October 2, 2004 |
September 27, 2003 |
October 2, 2004 |
September 27, 2003 | ||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 4.8 | $ | 4.2 | $ | 14.4 | $ | 12.7 | ||||||
Interest cost | 10.5 | 10.0 | 31.5 | 30.1 | ||||||||||
Expected return on assets | (12.5 | ) | (10.5 | ) | (37.6 | ) | (32.0 | ) | ||||||
Amortization of: | ||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss | 1.6 | 0.6 | 4.8 | 1.6 | ||||||||||
Prior service cost | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 1.4 | ||||||||||
Net transition asset | -- | (0.1 | ) | -- | (0.3 | ) | ||||||||
Curtailment (gain) loss | (0.1 | ) | 8.2 | (0.3 | ) | 8.2 | ||||||||
Net pension expense | $ | 4.7 | $ | 12.9 | $ | 14.0 | $ | 21.7 | ||||||
Snap-on has not made, and presently does not expect to make, a contribution to its domestic pension plans in 2004. |
13
9. | Snap-ons net postretirement health care benefits expense included the following components: |
Three Months Ended |
Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||
(Amounts in millions) | October 2, 2004 |
September 27, 2003 |
October 2, 2004 |
September 27, 2003 | ||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 0.2 | 0.1 | $ | 0.6 | $ | 0.6 | |||||||
Interest cost | 1.2 | 1.6 | 3.6 | 4.6 | ||||||||||
Amortization of actuarial (gain) | (0.2 | ) | -- | (0.7 | ) | -- | ||||||||
Net postretirement expense | $ | 1.2 | $ | 1.7 | $ | 3.5 | $ | 5.2 | ||||||
On December 8, 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act) was signed into law. The Act includes a prescription drug benefit under Medicare Part D as well as a federal subsidy beginning in 2006 to sponsors of retiree health care plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent, as defined in the Act, to Medicare Part D. In accordance with FASB Staff Position (FSP) Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) 106-1, Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, the company elected to defer the recognition of the effects of this Act on the consolidated financial statements until authoritative guidance on the federal subsidy was issued by the FASB. The final FASB guidance, FSP FAS 106-2, was issued May 19, 2004, and the company adopted the guidance prospectively in the third quarter of 2004. Based on the adoption of this guidance, the company believes its retiree health care plans are at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D and eligible for the federal subsidy. The cash flow the company expects to receive from the subsidy, when it becomes effective in 2006, is estimated to be approximately $0.1 million annually. Treating the provision of the Act as an actuarial experience gain as required by FSP FAS 106-2 will result in a decrease in the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation of approximately $1.1 million. |
10. | Snap-on has various stock award and purchase plans for directors, officers and key employees. |
Stock options outstanding under the 2001 Incentive Stock and Awards Plan (2001 Plan) and the predecessor plan have expiration dates ranging from 2005 to 2014 and vesting periods ranging from immediate to three years. The plans provide that options be granted at exercise prices equal to market value on the date the option is granted. Stock option activity under the 2001 Plan and predecessor plans was as follows: |
14
Three Months Ended October 2, 2004 |
Nine Months Ended October 2, 2004 | |||||||||||||
Options |
Exercise Price* |
Options |
Exercise Price* | |||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of period | 6,092,365 | $ | 30.54 | 5,642,219 | $ | 30.23 | ||||||||
Granted | -- | -- | 696,000 | 31.61 | ||||||||||
Exercised | 40,450 | 27.06 | 258,222 | 25.74 | ||||||||||
Canceled | 11,450 | 28.90 | 39,532 | 31.55 | ||||||||||
Outstanding at end of period | 6,040,465 | 30.57 | 6,040,465 | 30.57 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at end of period | 5,047,565 | 30.80 | 5,047,565 | 30.80 | ||||||||||
*Weighted-average |
The following table summaries information about stock options outstanding as of October 2, 2004: |
October 2, 2004 | |||||||||||
Range of Exercise Prices |
Options Outstanding |
Remaining Contractual Life (Years)* |
Exercise Price* | ||||||||
$19 to $25 | 10,125 | 0.37 | $ | 23.24 | |||||||
$25 to $31 | 3,161,929 | 6.39 | 27.18 | ||||||||
$31 to $38 | 2,429,276 | 6.34 | 33.31 | ||||||||
$38 to $46 | 439,135 | 3.32 | 39.98 | ||||||||
Totals | 6,040,465 | 6.14 | 30.57 | ||||||||
*Weighted-average |
Snap-on accounts for its stock-based employee compensation plans under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. In accordance with the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, no compensation expense was recorded for stock options as all options granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the measurement date. For restricted stock and stock appreciation rights awards, Snap-on recorded compensation expense in the respective periods as appropriate. |
The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings and earnings per share as if Snap-on had applied the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based employee compensation using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. |
15
Three Months Ended |
Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||
(Amounts in millions, except per share data) |
October 2, 2004 |
September 27, 2003 |
October 2, 2004 |
September 27, 2003 | ||||||||||
Net earnings, as reported | $ | 22.8 | $ | 17.7 | $ | 57.7 | $ | 61.4 | ||||||
Add: | ||||||||||||||
Stock-based employee | ||||||||||||||
compensation expense | ||||||||||||||
included in reported net | ||||||||||||||
income, net of related | ||||||||||||||
tax effects | (2.5 | ) | 0.3 | (0.2 | ) | 2.2 | ||||||||
Deduct: | ||||||||||||||
Total stock-based | ||||||||||||||
employee compensation | ||||||||||||||
expense determined under | ||||||||||||||
fair value based method | ||||||||||||||
for all awards, net of | ||||||||||||||
related tax effects | -- | (2.0 | ) | (3.5 | ) | (5.7 | ) | |||||||
Pro forma net earnings | $ | 20.3 | $ | 16.0 | $ | 54.0 | $ | 57.9 | ||||||
Net earnings per share - basic: | ||||||||||||||
As reported | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 1.00 | $ | 1.05 | ||||||
Pro forma | 0.35 | 0.27 | 0.93 | 0.99 | ||||||||||
Net earnings per share - diluted: | ||||||||||||||
As reported | 0.39 | 0.30 | 0.99 | 1.05 | ||||||||||
Pro forma | 0.35 | 0.27 | 0.92 | 0.99 |
11. | The shares used in the computation of the companys basic and diluted earnings per common share are as follows: |
Three Months Ended |
Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||
October 2, 2004 |
September 27, 2003 |
October 2, 2004 |
September 27, 2003 | |||||||||||
Weighted-average common | ||||||||||||||
shares outstanding | 57,732,681 | 58,289,152 | 57,938,107 | 58,242,517 | ||||||||||
Dilutive effect of employee | ||||||||||||||
stock options | 486,718 | 149,711 | 533,356 | 149,711 | ||||||||||
Weighted-average common | ||||||||||||||
shares outstanding, | ||||||||||||||
assuming dilution | 58,219,399 | 58,438,863 | 58,471,463 | 58,392,228 | ||||||||||
The dilutive effect of the potential exercise of outstanding options to purchase common shares is calculated using the treasury stock method. Options to purchase 2,177,411 shares and 3,779,270 shares of Snap-on common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended October 2, 2004, and September 27, 2003, as the exercise prices of the options were greater than the average market price of the common stock for the respective periods and the effect on earnings per share would be anti-dilutive. Options to purchase 1,456,807 shares and 3,779,270 shares of Snap-on common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the nine months ended October 2, 2004, and September 27, 2003, as the exercise prices of the options were greater than the average market price of the common stock for the respective periods and the effect on earnings per share would be anti-dilutive. |
16
12. | Total comprehensive income for the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2004, and September 27, 2003, was as follows: |
Three Months Ended |
Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||
(Amounts in millions) | October 2, 2004 |
September 27, 2003 |
October 2, 2004 |
September 27, 2003 | ||||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 22.8 | $ | 17.7 | $ | 57.7 | $ | 61.4 | ||||||
Foreign currency translation | 15.3 | 0.4 | (7.4 | ) | 79.1 | |||||||||
Change in fair value of | ||||||||||||||
derivative instruments, | ||||||||||||||
net of tax | 0.9 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 1.0 | ||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | $ | 39.0 | $ | 18.3 | $ | 51.7 | $ | 141.5 | ||||||
13. | Snap-on provides product warranties for specific product lines and accrues for estimated future warranty cost in the period in which the sale is recorded. Snap-on calculates its reserve requirements based on historic warranty loss experience that is periodically adjusted for recent actual experience. The following is an analysis of Snap-ons product warranty reserve for the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2004, and September 27, 2003: |
Three Months Ended |
Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||
(Amounts in millions) | October 2, 2004 |
September 27, 2003 |
October 2, 2004 |
September 27, 2003 | ||||||||||
Warranty reserve: | ||||||||||||||
Beginning of period | $ | 15.4 | $ | 13.2 | $ | 14.0 | $ | 12.7 | ||||||
Additions | 4.1 | 2.8 | 9.1 | 9.2 | ||||||||||
Usage | (4.2 | ) | (3.0 | ) | (7.8 | ) | (8.9 | ) | ||||||
End of period | $ | 15.3 | $ | 13.0 | $ | 15.3 | $ | 13.0 | ||||||
17
On July 23, 2004, Snap-on reached an agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice to resolve the government audit, previously discussed in the companys Annual Report and Form 10-K, relating to two contracts with the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA). Snap-on agreed to settle the claims over the interpretation and application of the price reduction and billing provisions of these two contracts for sales from March 1996 through the July 23, 2004, settlement date for $10 million. Snap-on incurred a pretax charge of $3.6 million, or $0.04 per diluted share, in the second quarter of 2004 for costs not previously accrued. Snap-on remitted the $10 million cash settlement to the U.S. Department of Justice on August 5, 2004. |
Snap-on is also involved in various other legal matters that are being defended and handled in the ordinary course of business. Snap-on maintains accruals for such costs that it expects to incur with regard to these matters. Although it is not possible to predict the outcome of these other legal matters, management believes that no existing litigation is likely to have a material adverse effect on Snap-on's consolidated financial position or results of operations. |
14. | Snap-ons business segments are based on the organization structure used by management for making operating and investment decisions and for assessing performance. Snap-ons reportable business segments include: (i) the Snap-on Dealer Group; (ii) the Commercial and Industrial Group; (iii) the Diagnostics and Information Group; and (iv) Financial Services. The Snap-on Dealer Group consists of Snap-ons business operations serving the worldwide franchised dealer van channel. The Commercial and Industrial Group consists of the business operations providing tools and equipment products and equipment repair services to a broad range of industrial and commercial customers worldwide through direct, distributor and other non-franchised distribution channels. The Diagnostics and Information Group consists of the business operations providing diagnostics equipment, vehicle-service information, business management systems and other solutions for vehicle service to customers in the worldwide vehicle service and repair marketplace. Financial Services is a new business segment, beginning in fiscal 2004, consisting of the business operations of SOC, a consolidated 50%-owned joint venture between Snap-on and CIT, and Snap-ons wholly owned finance subsidiaries in those international markets where Snap-on has dealer operations. Prior year segment disclosures have not been restated to include the Financial Services segment due to the prospective adoption of FIN No. 46R. See Note 2 for further discussion of SOC and the companys adoption of FIN No. 46R. |
During the third quarter of 2004, Snap-on realigned certain of its business units within its reportable business segments. The primary realignments included Snap-ons Equipment Solutions (facilitation) business moving from the Commercial and Industrial Group to the Diagnostics and Information Group and Snap-ons EquiServ (equipment services) business moving from the Diagnostics and Information Group to the Commercial and Industrial Group. Prior year financial data by segment has been restated to reflect these reportable business segment realignments. These realignments reflect the companys desire to further simplify its organization and enable greater business unit accountability and control over key portions of the value chain. |
18
Snap-on evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on segment revenues and operating earnings. Segment revenues are defined as total revenues, including both external customer revenue and intersegment revenue. Segment operating earnings are defined as revenues less cost of goods sold and operating expenses. Snap-on accounts for intersegment sales and transfers based primarily on standard costs with reasonable mark-ups established between the segments. Snap-on allocates shared services expenses to those segments that utilize the services based on a percentage of either cost of goods sold or segment revenues, as appropriate. |
Neither Snap-on nor any of its segments, except Financial Services, depend on any single customer, small group of customers or government for more than 10% of its revenues. As a result of SOCs relationship with CIT, Snap-ons Financial Services business segment depends on CIT for more than 10% of its revenues. See Note 2 for further discussion of SOC. |
Financial data by segment was as follows: |
Three Months Ended |
Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||
(Amounts in millions) | October 2, 2004 |
September 27, 2003 |
October 2, 2004 |
September 27, 2003 | ||||||||||
External revenue: | ||||||||||||||
Snap-on Dealer Group | $ | 255.2 | $ | 244.3 | $ | 796.7 | $ | 776.1 | ||||||
Commercial and | ||||||||||||||
Industrial Group | 226.1 | 215.9 | 728.7 | 659.9 | ||||||||||
Diagnostics and | ||||||||||||||
Information Group | 69.6 | 65.4 | 211.9 | 197.9 | ||||||||||
Financial Services | 17.9 | -- | 59.9 | -- | ||||||||||
Total external revenue | $ | 568.8 | $ | 525.6 | $ | 1,797.2 | $ | 1,633.9 | ||||||
Intersegment revenue: | ||||||||||||||
Snap-on Dealer Group | $ | 5.7 | $ | 5.6 | $ | 17.7 | $ | 17.8 | ||||||
Commercial and | ||||||||||||||
Industrial Group | 30.8 | 29.1 | 97.2 | 92.1 | ||||||||||
Diagnostics and | ||||||||||||||
Information Group | 48.4 | 32.7 | 116.2 | 97.5 | ||||||||||
Financial Services | -- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||
Total intersegment revenue | $ | 84.9 | $ | 67.4 | $ | 231.1 | $ | 207.4 | ||||||
19
Three Months Ended |
Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||
(Amounts in millions) | October 2, 2004 |
September 27, 2003 |
October 2, 2004 |
September 27, 2003 | ||||||||||
Total revenue: | ||||||||||||||
Snap-on Dealer Group | $ | 260.9 | $ | 249.9 | $ | 814.4 | $ | 793.9 | ||||||
Commercial and | ||||||||||||||
Industrial Group | 256.9 | 245.0 | 825.9 | 752.0 | ||||||||||
Diagnostics and | ||||||||||||||
Information Group | 118.0 | 98.1 | 328.1 | 295.4 | ||||||||||
Financial Services | 17.9 | -- | 59.9 | -- | ||||||||||
Total segment revenue | 653.7 | 593.0 | 2,028.3 | 1,841.3 | ||||||||||
Intersegment eliminations | (84.9 | ) | (67.4 | ) | (231.1 | ) | (207.4 | ) | ||||||
Total consolidated revenue | $ | 568.8 | $ | 525.6 | $ | 1,797.2 | $ | 1,633.9 | ||||||
Operating earnings (loss): | ||||||||||||||
Snap-on Dealer Group | $ | 11.9 | $ | 8.4 | $ | 48.6 | $ | 56.1 | ||||||
Commercial and | ||||||||||||||
Industrial Group | (0.9 | ) | 3.9 | (5.9 | ) | 12.6 | ||||||||
Diagnostics and | ||||||||||||||
Information Group | 18.1 | 8.8 | 33.7 | 14.4 | ||||||||||
Financial Services | 7.4 | -- | 27.9 | -- | ||||||||||
Segment operating earnings | 36.5 | 21.1 | 104.3 | 83.1 | ||||||||||
Net finance income | -- | 10.0 | -- | 31.7 | ||||||||||
Operating earnings | 36.5 | 31.1 | 104.3 | 114.8 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | (6.1 | ) | (5.8 | ) | (17.4 | ) | (18.2 | ) | ||||||
Other income (expense) - net | (0.8 | ) | (2.4 | ) | (3.6 | ) | (6.5 | ) | ||||||
Earnings before income taxes | $ | 29.6 | $ | 22.9 | $ | 83.3 | $ | 90.1 | ||||||
(Amounts in millions) | October 2, 2004 |
January 3, 2004 | ||||||
Assets: | ||||||||
Snap-on Dealer Group | $ | 831.9 | $ | 786.3 | ||||
Commercial and Industrial Group | 1,039.2 | 1,060.7 | ||||||
Diagnostics and Information Group | 205.7 | 224.5 | ||||||
Financial Services | 155.4 | -- | ||||||
Total from reportable segments | 2,232.2 | 2,071.5 | ||||||
Financial Services | -- | 103.9 | ||||||
Elimination of intersegment receivables | (81.7 | ) | (36.9 | ) | ||||
Total assets | $ | 2,150.5 | $ | 2,138.5 | ||||
20
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued interpretation (FIN) No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (an interpretation of ARB No. 51) in December 2003, which became effective for Snap-on at the beginning of its 2004 fiscal year. FIN No. 46R provides consolidation guidance regarding the identification of variable interest entities (VIE) for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights. FIN No. 46R provides guidance in determining if a business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE and whether or not that business enterprise should consolidate the VIE for financial reporting purposes.
Based on the companys analysis of FIN No. 46R, the company concluded that Snap-on would consolidate Snap-on Credit LLC (SOC) as of January 4, 2004, the beginning of Snap-ons 2004 fiscal year. Snap-on previously accounted for SOC, a 50%-owned joint venture with The CIT Group, Inc. (CIT), using the equity method. Snap-on has consolidated SOC on a prospective basis and, as such, has not restated previously issued financial statements. The impact of the consolidation of SOC on Snap-ons consolidated balance sheet was not significant. As a result of the consolidation of SOC in fiscal 2004, Snap-on is reporting the results of its finance operations as a new business segment, Financial Services. Refer to Notes 2 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of SOC and Snap-ons business segments.
Highlights of Snap-ons results of operations for the third quarters of 2004 and 2003 are as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | October 2, 2004* |
September 27, 2003* |
Increase/ (Decrease)** | |||||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 550.9 | 96.9 | % | $ | 525.6 | 100.0 | % | $ | 25.3 | 4.8 | % | ||||||||
Financial services revenue | 17.9 | 3.1 | % | -- | 0.0 | % | 17.9 | |||||||||||||
Total revenue | 568.8 | 100.0 | % | 525.6 | 100.0 | % | 43.2 | 8.2 | % | |||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 311.5 | 54.8 | % | 303.8 | 57.8 | % | 7.7 | 2.5 | % | |||||||||||
Operating expenses | 220.8 | 38.8 | % | 200.7 | 38.2 | % | 20.1 | 10.0 | % | |||||||||||
Net finance income | -- | 0.0 | % | 10.0 | 1.9 | % | (10.0 | ) | ||||||||||||
Operating earnings | 36.5 | 6.4 | % | 31.1 | 5.9 | % | 5.4 | 17.4 | % | |||||||||||
Interest expense | 6.1 | 1.1 | % | 5.8 | 1.1 | % | 0.3 | 5.2 | % | |||||||||||
Other (income) expense - net | 0.8 | 0.1 | % | 2.4 | 0.4 | % | (1.6 | ) | - | 66.7 | % | |||||||||
Earnings before income taxes | 29.6 | 5.2 | % | 22.9 | 4.4 | % | 6.7 | 29.3 | % | |||||||||||
Income taxes | 6.8 | 1.2 | % | 5.2 | 1.0 | % | 1.6 | 30.8 | % | |||||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 22.8 | 4.0 | % | $ | 17.7 | 3.4 | % | $ | 5.1 | 28.8 | % | ||||||||
* Percent amount represents corresponding dollar amount as a percent of total revenue.
** Percent amount represents percentage increase or decrease relative to the three months ended September 27, 2003.
21
Total revenue in the third quarter of 2004 increased $43.2 million, or 8.2%, over prior-year levels. Of the year-over-year increase in total revenues, $16.6 million was attributable to currency translation and $17.9 million resulted from the consolidation of SOC, previously accounted for under the equity method, and Snap-ons wholly owned financial services subsidiaries. Sales also increased $8.7 million, or 1.7%, year over year on higher sales of handheld diagnostics tools worldwide, increased sales in the domestic and international dealer businesses, and increased sales of equipment worldwide, partially offset by lower sales of industrial tools in North America. In Europe, commercial and industrial tool sales were essentially flat.
Gross profit (defined as net sales less cost of goods sold) increased $17.6 million, or 130 basis points (100 basis points equals 1.0 percent) to 43.5% of net sales. The impact of higher sales, $10.7 million in lower year-over-year continuous improvement action costs, $5.9 million of currency translation and $2.3 million in cost savings achieved from the closure and relocation of two U.S. hand-tool plants in March 2004 was partially offset by $7.7 million from lower LIFO benefits and other inventory costs, $5.7 million of costs associated with production inefficiencies and other manufacturing variances associated with the relocation of production from the two U.S. hand-tool plants and a $3.5 million impact from increases in steel costs.
Operating expenses in the third quarter of 2004 increased $20.1 million, or 60 basis points as a percentage of total revenue, from the third quarter of 2003, including $10.5 million from the consolidation of SOC, previously accounted for under the equity method, and Snap-ons wholly owned financial services subsidiaries. Foreign currency translation contributed $5.1 million to the year-over-year operating expense increase. Operating expenses during the third quarter of 2004 were impacted by the higher sales, as well as $1.8 million of higher freight costs, reflecting increased freight rates and smaller, but more frequent, shipments to dealers and $1.0 million associated with the companys expansion of its distribution system and operating presence in Asia.
22
Highlights of Snap-ons results of operations for the first nine months of 2004 and 2003 are as follows:
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | October 2, 2004* |
September 27, 2003* |
Increase/ (Decrease)** | |||||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 1,737.3 | 96.7 | % | $ | 1,633.9 | 100.0 | % | $ | 103.4 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||
Financial services revenue | 59.9 | 3.3 | % | -- | 0.0 | % | 59.9 | |||||||||||||
Total revenue | 1,797.2 | 100.0 | % | 1,633.9 | 100.0 | % | 163.3 | 10.0 | % | |||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 992.7 | 55.2 | % | 920.6 | 56.3 | % | 72.1 | 7.8 | % | |||||||||||
Operating expenses | 700.2 | 39.0 | % | 630.2 | 38.6 | % | 70.0 | 11.1 | % | |||||||||||
Net finance income | -- | 0.0 | % | 31.7 | 1.9 | % | (31.7 | ) | ||||||||||||
Operating earnings | 104.3 | 5.8 | % | 114.8 | 7.0 | % | (10.5 | ) | - | 9.1 | % | |||||||||
Interest expense | 17.4 | 1.0 | % | 18.2 | 1.1 | % | (0.8 | ) | - | 4.4 | % | |||||||||
Other (income) expense - net | 3.6 | 0.2 | % | 6.5 | 0.4 | % | (2.9 | ) | - | 44.6 | % | |||||||||
Earnings before income taxes | 83.3 | 4.6 | % | 90.1 | 5.5 | % | (6.8 | ) | - | 7.5 | % | |||||||||
Income taxes | 25.6 | 1.4 | % | 28.7 | 1.8 | % | (3.1 | ) | - | 10.8 | % | |||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 57.7 | 3.2 | % | $ | 61.4 | 3.8 | % | $ | (3.7 | ) | - | 6.0 | % | ||||||
* Percent amount represents corresponding dollar amount as a percent of total revenue.
** Percent amount represents percentage increase or decrease relative to the nine months ended September 27, 2003.
Total revenue in the first nine months of 2004 increased $163.3 million, or 10.0%, over prior-year levels. Of the year-over-year increase in total revenues, $65.3 million was attributable to currency translation and $59.9 million resulted from the consolidation of SOC, previously accounted for under the equity method, and Snap-ons wholly owned financial services subsidiaries. Sales increased $38.1 million, or 2.3%, year over year on improved worldwide sales of industrial tools, equipment and diagnostics, as well as higher worldwide sales in the dealer business.
Gross profit increased $31.3 million, but decreased 80 basis points to 42.9% of net sales. The impact of higher sales and $24.2 million of currency translation was partially offset by $12.4 million from lower LIFO benefits and other inventory costs, $6.9 million of higher expenses from production inefficiencies and other manufacturing variances associated with the relocation of production from the two U.S. hand-tool plants and a $4.1 million impact from increases in steel costs.
Operating expenses in the first nine months of 2004 increased $70.0 million, or 40 basis points as a percentage of total revenue, from the first nine months of 2003, including $32.0 million from the consolidation of SOC, previously accounted for under the equity method, and Snap-ons wholly owned financial services subsidiaries. Foreign currency translation contributed $19.8 million to the year-over-year operating expense increase. Operating expenses during the first nine months of 2004 also included the impact of higher sales, higher freight expense of $4.3 million, reflecting increased freight rates and smaller, but more frequent, shipments to dealers, $3.6 million of costs associated with the settlement of two U.S. General Services Administration ("GSA") contract audits and start-up costs of $3.5 million associated with the companys expansion of its distribution system and operating presence in Asia.
23
Snap-ons business segments are based on the organization structure used by management for making operating and investment decisions and for assessing performance. Snap-ons reportable business segments include: (i) the Snap-on Dealer Group; (ii) the Commercial and Industrial Group; (iii) the Diagnostics and Information Group; and (iv) Financial Services. The Snap-on Dealer Group consists of Snap-ons business operations serving the worldwide franchised dealer van channel. The Commercial and Industrial Group consists of the business operations providing tools and equipment products and equipment repair services to a broad range of industrial and commercial customers worldwide through direct, distributor and other non-franchised distribution channels. The Diagnostics and Information Group consists of the business operations providing diagnostics equipment, vehicle-service information, business management systems and other solutions for vehicle service to customers in the worldwide vehicle service and repair marketplace. Financial Services is a new business segment, beginning in fiscal 2004, consisting of the business operations of SOC, a consolidated 50%-owned joint venture between Snap-on and CIT, and Snap-ons wholly owned finance subsidiaries in those international markets where Snap-on has dealer operations. Prior year segment disclosures have not been restated to include the Financial Services segment due to the prospective adoption of FIN No. 46R. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of SOC and the companys adoption of FIN No. 46R.
During the third quarter of 2004, Snap-on realigned certain of its business units within its reportable business segments. The primary realignments included Snap-ons Equipment Solutions (facilitation) business moving from the Commercial and Industrial Group to the Diagnostics and Information Group and Snap-ons EquiServ (equipment services) business moving from the Diagnostics and Information Group to the Commercial and Industrial Group. Prior year financial data by segment has been restated to reflect these reportable business segment realignments.
Snap-on evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on segment revenues and operating earnings. Segment revenues are defined as total revenues, including both external customer revenue and intersegment revenue. Segment operating earnings are defined as segment revenues less cost of goods sold and operating expenses. Snap-on accounts for intersegment sales and transfers based primarily on standard costs with reasonable mark-ups established between the segments. Snap-on allocates shared services expenses to those segments that utilize the services based on a percentage of either cost of goods sold or segment revenues, as appropriate.
24
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | October 2, 2004* |
September 27, 2003* |
Increase/ (Decrease)** | |||||||||||||||||
External revenue | $ | 255.2 | 97.8 | % | $ | 244.3 | 97.8 | % | $ | 10.9 | 4.5 | % | ||||||||
Intersegment revenue | 5.7 | 2.2 | % | 5.6 | 2.2 | % | 0.1 | 1.8 | % | |||||||||||
Total segment revenue | 260.9 | 100.0 | % | 249.9 | 100.0 | % | 11.0 | 4.4 | % | |||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 150.0 | 57.5 | % | 145.5 | 58.2 | % | 4.5 | 3.1 | % | |||||||||||
Gross profit | 110.9 | 42.5 | % | 104.4 | 41.8 | % | 6.5 | 6.2 | % | |||||||||||
Operating expenses | 99.0 | 37.9 | % | 96.0 | 38.4 | % | 3.0 | 3.1 | % | |||||||||||
Segment operating earnings | $ | 11.9 | 4.6 | % | $ | 8.4 | 3.4 | % | $ | 3.5 | 41.7 | % | ||||||||
* Percent amount represents corresponding dollar amount as a percent of total segment revenue.
** Percent amount represents percentage increase or decrease relative to the three months ended September 27, 2003.
Total segment revenue in the third quarter of 2004 increased $11.0 million, or 4.4%, over prior-year levels due to a $6.3 million increase in worldwide sales, primarily due to $5.4 million from higher price realization, and $4.7 million of currency translation. In the United States, sales were 1.5% higher year over year, despite a sales decline in the Southeastern United States, believed to be primarily caused by the impact from the widespread hurricane activity during the third quarter. The average number of dealer vans in operation during the third quarter of 2004 was down year over year primarily due to a lower level of new dealer additions in 2004. During the first quarter of 2004, Snap-on tightened eligibility requirements for its franchise dealer expansion and enhancement initiative and the recruitment standards for prospective dealers, aimed at improving the strength of its franchised dealer network. For the quarter, sales by Snap-on U.S. franchised dealers to their customers (as reported to Snap-on by its dealers) continued to grow, increasing at a mid-single-digit rate. In the companys international dealer businesses, third quarter segment revenue increased $7.9 million year over year, including $4.8 million from currency translation.
Segment gross profit for the third quarter of 2004 increased $6.5 million, or 70 basis points as a percentage of total segment revenue, from the same period last year primarily due to the impact of $11.2 million in lower year-over-year continuous improvement activity costs, $2.5 million from higher sales, $2.0 million in cost savings achieved from the closure and relocation of the two U.S. hand-tool plants and $1.7 million of currency translation, partially offset by $4.9 million of costs associated with production inefficiencies and other manufacturing variances associated with the relocation of production from the two U.S. hand-tool plants, $3.4 million from lower LIFO benefits and other inventory costs and a $3.0 million impact from increases in steel costs. Operating expenses for the Snap-on Dealer Group increased $3.0 million year over year, but decreased 50 basis points as a percentage of total segment revenue. The $3.0 million increase in operating expenses primarily reflects $1.7 million in higher freight costs, reflecting increased freight rates and smaller, but more frequent, shipments to dealers and $1.4 million of currency translation, partially offset by a $2.1 million reduction in bad debt expense. As a result of these factors, segment operating earnings in the third quarter of 2004 increased $3.5 million, or 120 basis points as a percentage of total segment revenue, as compared to the third quarter of 2003.
25
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | October 2, 2004* |
September 27, 2003* |
Increase/ (Decrease)** | |||||||||||||||||
External revenue | $ | 796.7 | 97.8 | % | $ | 776.1 | 97.8 | % | $ | 20.6 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||
Intersegment revenue | 17.7 | 2.2 | % | 17.8 | 2.2 | % | (0.1 | ) | - | 0.6 | % | |||||||||
Total segment revenue | 814.4 | 100.0 | % | 793.9 | 100.0 | % | 20.5 | 2.6 | % | |||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 457.8 | 56.2 | % | 433.8 | 54.6 | % | 24.0 | 5.5 | % | |||||||||||
Gross profit | 356.6 | 43.8 | % | 360.1 | 45.4 | % | (3.5 | ) | - | 1.0 | % | |||||||||
Operating expenses | 308.0 | 37.8 | % | 304.0 | 38.3 | % | 4.0 | 1.3 | % | |||||||||||
Segment operating earnings | $ | 48.6 | 6.0 | % | $ | 56.1 | 7.1 | % | $ | (7.5 | ) | - | 13.4 | % | ||||||
* Percent amount represents corresponding dollar amount as a percent of total segment revenue.
** Percent amount represents percentage increase or decrease relative to the nine months ended September 27, 2003.
Total segment revenue for the first nine months of 2004 increased $20.5 million, or 2.6%, over prior-year levels due to $17.9 million of currency translation and a $2.6 million increase in worldwide sales. In the United States, sales were 0.3% lower year over year. The average number of dealer vans in operation during the first nine months of 2004 was down year over year primarily due to a lower level of new dealer additions in 2004. During the first quarter of 2004, Snap-on tightened eligibility requirements for its franchise dealer expansion and enhancement initiative and the recruitment standards for prospective dealers, aimed at improving the strength of its franchised dealer network. For the first nine months of 2004, sales by Snap-on U.S. franchised dealers to their customers (as reported to Snap-on by its dealers) continued to grow, increasing at a mid-single-digit rate. In the companys international dealer businesses, segment revenue for the first nine months of 2004 increased $21.7 million year over year, including $19.3 million from currency translation.
Segment gross profit for the first nine months of 2004 decreased $3.5 million, or 160 basis points as a percentage of total segment revenue, from the same period last year, primarily due to $7.8 million of costs associated with production inefficiencies and other manufacturing variances associated with the relocation of production from the two U.S. hand-tool plants, $3.6 million of lower LIFO benefits and other inventory costs and a $3.5 million impact from increases in steel costs. These higher costs were partially offset by $6.8 million of currency translation and $5.0 million in lower year-over-year continuous improvement activity costs. Operating expenses for the Snap-on Dealer Group increased $4.0 million year over year, but decreased 50 basis points as a percentage of total segment revenue. The $4.0 million increase in operating expenses primarily reflects $5.4 million of currency translation and $4.3 million of higher freight expense, reflecting increased freight rates and smaller, but more frequent, shipments to dealers, partially offset by $5.5 million of lower bad debt expense and lower year-over-year continuous improvement costs of $1.6 million. As a result of these factors, segment operating earnings in the first nine months of 2004 decreased $7.5 million, or 110 basis points as a percentage of total segment revenue, as compared to the first nine months of 2003.
26
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | October 2, 2004* |
September 27, 2003* |
Increase/ (Decrease)** | |||||||||||||||||
External revenue | $ | 226.1 | 88.0 | % | $ | 215.9 | 88.1 | % | $ | 10.2 | 4.7 | % | ||||||||
Intersegment revenue | 30.8 | 12.0 | % | 29.1 | 11.9 | % | 1.7 | 5.8 | % | |||||||||||
Total segment revenue | 256.9 | 100.0 | % | 245.0 | 100.0 | % | 11.9 | 4.9 | % | |||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 173.9 | 67.7 | % | 163.2 | 66.6 | % | 10.7 | 6.6 | % | |||||||||||
Gross profit | 83.0 | 32.3 | % | 81.8 | 33.4 | % | 1.2 | 1.5 | % | |||||||||||
Operating expenses | 83.9 | 32.7 | % | 77.9 | 31.8 | % | 6.0 | 7.7 | % | |||||||||||
Segment operating | ||||||||||||||||||||
(loss) earnings | $ | (0.9 | ) | - | 0.4 | % | $ | 3.9 | 1.6 | % | $ | (4.8 | ) | - | 123.1 | % | ||||
* Percent amount represents corresponding dollar amount as a percent of total segment revenue.
** Percent amount represents percentage increase or decrease relative to the three months ended September 27, 2003.
Total segment revenue in the third quarter of 2004 increased $11.9 million, or 4.9%, over prior-year levels due to $10.0 million of currency translation and $1.9 million of improved sales. Higher sales of vehicle-service equipment worldwide and a slight increase in sales of tools in Europe and Asia were partially offset by a decline in sales of hand and power tools used in industrial applications in North America.
Segment gross profit for the third quarter of 2004 increased $1.2 million, but decreased 110 basis points as a percentage of total segment revenue. Benefits realized from higher sales and $3.4 million of currency translation were partially offset by a $2.8 million year-over-year impact from lower LIFO benefits and other inventory costs, $1.1 million of increased freight costs, reflecting increased freight rates and $1.0 million costs associated with production inefficiencies and other manufacturing variances associated with the relocation of production from the two U.S. hand-tool plants. Operating expenses for the Commercial and Industrial Group increased $6.0 million, or 90 basis points as a percentage of total segment revenue. The increase in operating expenses reflects the impact of higher sales, $3.0 million of currency translation, $1.7 million in higher bad debt expense and $1.0 million of start-up costs associated with the companys investment to expand its distribution and operating presence in Asia, partially offset by a $1.7 million gain from a facility sale. Operating expenses were also impacted by $1.0 million in higher year-over-year continuous improvement actions, including costs for the consolidation of three European manufacturing facilities. As a result, segment operating earnings in the third quarter of 2004 decreased $4.8 million as compared to the third quarter of 2003.
27
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | October 2, 2004* |
September 27, 2003* |
Increase/ (Decrease)** | |||||||||||||||||
External revenue | $ | 728.7 | 88.2 | % | $ | 659.9 | 87.8 | % | $ | 68.8 | 10.4 | % | ||||||||
Intersegment revenue | 97.2 | 11.8 | % | 92.1 | 12.2 | % | 5.1 | 5.5 | % | |||||||||||
Total segment revenue | 825.9 | 100.0 | % | 752.0 | 100.0 | % | 73.9 | 9.8 | % | |||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 555.0 | 67.2 | % | 496.3 | 66.0 | % | 58.7 | 11.8 | % | |||||||||||
Gross profit | 270.9 | 32.8 | % | 255.7 | 34.0 | % | 15.2 | 5.9 | % | |||||||||||
Operating expenses | 276.8 | 33.5 | % | 243.1 | 32.3 | % | 33.7 | 13.9 | % | |||||||||||
Segment operating | ||||||||||||||||||||
(loss) earnings | $ | (5.9 | ) | - | 0.7 | % | $ | 12.6 | 1.7 | % | $ | (18.5 | ) | - | 146.8 | % | ||||
* Percent amount represents corresponding dollar amount as a percent of total segment revenue.
** Percent amount represents percentage increase or decrease relative to the nine months ended September 27, 2003.
Total segment revenue for the first nine months of 2004 increased $73.9 million, or 9.8%, over prior-year levels due to $41.8 million of currency translation and $32.1 million in higher sales. Demand for tools in the first nine months of 2004 improved in both North America and Europe despite a decline in sales of hand and power tools used in industrial applications in North America in the third quarter, with increased sales of hand and power tools used in industrial and commercial applications. In addition, higher sales of vehicle-service equipment were achieved in both North America, through the companys Technical Automotive Group (TAG) distribution channel, and in Europe.
Segment gross profit for the first nine months of 2004 increased $15.2 million, but decreased 120 basis points as a percentage of total segment revenue. Benefits realized from higher sales and $14.9 million of currency translation were partially offset by $8.5 million of lower LIFO benefits and other inventory costs, $4.2 million of higher year-over-year continuous improvement activity costs, $2.0 million of increased freight costs, reflecting increased freight rates and $1.6 million in higher expenses from production inefficiencies and other manufacturing variances associated with the relocation of production from the two U.S. hand-tool plants. Operating expenses for the Commercial and Industrial Group increased $33.7 million, or 120 basis points as a percentage of total segment revenue. The increase in operating expenses reflects the impact of higher sales, $12.1 million of currency translation, $4.0 million in higher bad debt expense, $3.6 million of costs associated with the GSA contract audits settlement and a $1.9 million year-over-year increase in continuous improvement costs, partially offset by a $1.7 million gain from the sale of a facility. Operating expenses were also impacted by $3.5 million of start-up costs associated with the companys investment to expand its distribution and operating presence in Asia. As a result, segment operating earnings in the first nine months of 2004 decreased $18.5 million as compared to the first nine months of 2003.
28
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | October 2, 2004* |
September 27, 2003* |
Increase/ (Decrease)** | |||||||||||||||||
External revenue | $ | 69.6 | 59.0 | % | $ | 65.4 | 66.7 | % | $ | 4.2 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||
Intersegment revenue | 48.4 | 41.0 | % | 32.7 | 33.3 | % | 15.7 | 48.0 | % | |||||||||||
Total segment revenue | 118.0 | 100.0 | % | 98.1 | 100.0 | % | 19.9 | 20.3 | % | |||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 72.4 | 61.4 | % | 62.6 | 63.8 | % | 9.8 | 15.7 | % | |||||||||||
Gross profit | 45.6 | 38.6 | % | 35.5 | 36.2 | % | 10.1 | 28.5 | % | |||||||||||
Operating expenses | 27.5 | 23.3 | % | 26.7 | 27.2 | % | 0.8 | 3.0 | % | |||||||||||
Segment operating earnings | $ | 18.1 | 15.3 | % | $ | 8.8 | 9.0 | % | $ | 9.3 | 105.7 | % | ||||||||
* Percent amount represents corresponding dollar amount as a percent of total segment revenue.
** Percent amount represents percentage increase or decrease relative to the three months ended September 27, 2003.
Total segment revenue in the third quarter of 2004 increased $19.9 million, or 20.3%, over prior-year levels primarily due to $17.7 million in higher sales, primarily attributable to growth in Snap-on® handheld diagnostics, in particular the launch of the Snap-on® SOLUSTM ScannerTM diagnostics tool through the U.S. dealer business. Currency translation of $2.2 million also contributed to the year-over-year increase in segment revenue.
Segment gross profit for the third quarter of 2004 increased $10.1 million, or 240 basis points as a percentage of total segment revenue, from the same period last year, largely reflecting the growth in sales and benefits from prior continuous improvement activities. Operating expenses for the Diagnostics and Information Group were essentially flat year over year, but improved 390 basis points as a percentage of total segment revenue, primarily reflecting the impact of higher sales. As a result, segment operating earnings in the third quarter of 2004 increased $9.3 million, or 630 basis points as a percentage of total segment revenue, as compared to the third quarter of 2003.
29
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | October 2, 2004* |
September 27, 2003* |
Increase/ (Decrease)** | |||||||||||||||||
External revenue | $ | 211.9 | 64.6 | % | $ | 197.9 | 67.0 | % | $ | 14.0 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||
Intersegment revenue | 116.2 | 35.4 | % | 97.5 | 33.0 | % | 18.7 | 19.2 | % | |||||||||||
Total segment revenue | 328.1 | 100.0 | % | 295.4 | 100.0 | % | 32.7 | 11.1 | % | |||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 210.9 | 64.3 | % | 198.0 | 67.0 | % | 12.9 | 6.5 | % | |||||||||||
Gross profit | 117.2 | 35.7 | % | 97.4 | 33.0 | % | 19.8 | 20.3 | % | |||||||||||
Operating expenses | 83.5 | 25.4 | % | 83.0 | 28.1 | % | 0.5 | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||
Segment operating earnings | $ | 33.7 | 10.3 | % | $ | 14.4 | 4.9 | % | $ | 19.3 | 134.0 | % | ||||||||
* Percent amount represents corresponding dollar amount as a percent of total segment revenue.
** Percent amount represents percentage increase or decrease relative to the nine months ended September 27, 2003.
Total segment revenue for the first nine months of 2004 increased $32.7 million, or 11.1%, over prior-year levels primarily due to $25.7 million in higher sales, principally sales of handheld diagnostics, as well as $7.0 million of currency translation.
Segment gross profit for the first nine months of 2004 increased $19.8 million, or 270 basis points as a percentage of total segment revenue, from the same period last year largely reflecting the growth in sales of handheld diagnostics and information products, $4.3 million of benefits from prior continuous improvement activities and $2.5 million of currency translation. Operating expenses for the Diagnostics and Information Group were essentially flat, but decreased 270 basis points as a percentage of total segment revenue, reflecting $2.3 million of currency translation partially offset by $1.1 million of lower bad debt expense. As a result, segment operating earnings in the first nine months of 2004 increased $19.3 million, or 540 basis points as a percentage of total segment revenue, as compared to the first nine months of 2003.
Segment operating results for Financial Services for the three and nine months ended October 2, 2004, are as follows:
(Dollars in millions) | Three Months |
Nine Months | ||||||
External revenue | $ | 17.9 | $ | 59.9 | ||||
Intersegment revenue | -- | -- | ||||||
Total segment revenue | 17.9 | 59.9 | ||||||
Operating expenses | 10.5 | 32.0 | ||||||
Segment operating earnings | $ | 7.4 | $ | 27.9 | ||||
Segment operating earnings for the third quarter and the first nine months of 2004 were $7.4 million and $27.9 million. Net finance income was $10.0 million and $31.7 million in the third quarter and first nine months of 2003. Operating earnings for the third quarter and the first nine months of 2004 decreased year over year primarily due to lower loan originations and higher market interest rates. Snap-on believes the decline in loan originations is primarily due to sales mix in the Snap-on Dealer Group and a reduced level of dealer borrowings resulting from the strengthening fiscal health of dealers, combined with the introduction of the extended trial franchise program.
30
Interest expense was $6.1 million in the third quarter of 2004, up $0.3 million from $5.8 million in the third quarter of 2003. For the first nine months of 2004, interest expense of $17.4 million was down $0.8 million from $18.2 million in the prior year. The year-over-year increase in the third quarter primarily reflects higher average interest rates, partially offset by lower average debt levels. For the first nine months of 2004, the year-over-year decline primarily reflects the impact of lower average debt levels due to cash flow from operating activities, partially offset by higher average interest rates.
Other income (expense) net was an expense of $0.8 million for the third quarter of 2004, as compared to an expense of $2.4 million in the comparable prior-year period. This line item includes the impact of all non-operating items such as interest income, minority interest, hedging and currency exchange rate transaction gains and losses, and other miscellaneous non-operating items. Other expense decreased $1.6 million in the third quarter of 2004 over the prior-year level largely due to lower foreign exchange losses. Other income (expense) net was an expense of $3.6 million for the first nine months of 2004, as compared to an expense of $6.5 million in the comparable prior-year period. Other expense decreased $2.9 million in the first nine months of 2004 over the prior-year level primarily due to $4.2 million of lower foreign exchange losses, partially offset by a $1.1 million increase in minority interests.
Snap-ons effective tax rate of 23.0% and 22.7% for the third quarter of 2004 and 2003 both benefited from the conclusion of prior-years tax matters. For the first nine months of 2004 and 2003, Snap-ons overall effective tax rate was 30.7% and 31.9%. Snap-on anticipates that its effective tax rate for the fourth quarter of 2004 will approximate 35%.
For a discussion of Snap-ons exit and disposal activities, refer to Note 5 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Snap-ons growth has historically been funded by a combination of cash provided by operating activities and debt financing. Snap-on believes that its cash from operations, coupled with its sources of borrowings, are sufficient to fund its anticipated requirements for working capital, capital expenditures and restructuring and continuous improvement activities, acquisitions, common stock repurchases and dividend payments. Due to Snap-ons credit rating over the years, external funds have been available at a reasonable cost. As of the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q, Snap-ons long-term debt and commercial paper was rated A2 and P-1 by Moodys Investors Service and A and A-1 by Standard & Poors. Snap-on believes that the strength of its balance sheet affords the company the financial flexibility to respond to both internal growth opportunities and those available through acquisitions.
31
The following discussion focuses on information included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Snap-on has been focused on improving asset utilization by making more effective use of its investment in certain working capital items. Termed working investment, the company uses this measure to assess managements operating performance and effectiveness relative to those components of working capital that are more directly impacted by operational decisions. As of October 2, 2004, working investment (defined as accounts receivable net of allowances plus inventories less accounts payable) of $672.0 million was down $36.2 million from the $708.2 million as of year-end 2003. The following represents the companys working investment position as of October 2, 2004, and January 3, 2004.
(Amounts in millions) | October 2, 2004 |
January 3, 2004 | ||||||
Accounts receivable - net of allowances | $ | 527.5 | $ | 546.8 | ||||
Total inventories | 345.3 | 351.1 | ||||||
Accounts payable | (200.8 | ) | (189.7 | ) | ||||
Working investment | $ | 672.0 | $ | 708.2 | ||||
Accounts receivable at the end of the third quarter of 2004 was $527.5 million, down $19.3 million from year-end 2003 levels, including a decrease of $1.3 million from currency translation. At the end of the third quarter of 2004, days sales outstanding improved to 86 days from 88 days at January 3, 2004.
Inventories totaled $345.3 million at the end of the third quarter of 2004, down $5.8 million from year-end 2003 levels, including a decrease of $1.5 million from currency translation. Inventories accounted for using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method as of October 2, 2004, and January 3, 2004, approximated 63% and 69% of total inventories, respectively. All other inventories are generally accounted for using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) cost method. The companys LIFO reserve declined from $81.8 million at January 3, 2004, to $80.7 million at October 2, 2004. Inventory turns (defined as the current quarters cost of goods sold annualized, divided by the average of the last four quarter-ends inventory balances) at October 2, 2004, were 3.6 turns, as compared to 3.5 turns at year-end 2003.
Total notes payable and long-term debt was $331.8 million at the end of the third quarter of 2004, as compared to $333.2 million at year-end 2003. Cash and cash equivalents were $153.3 million as of October 2, 2004, and $96.1 million at the end of fiscal 2003. The increase in cash and cash equivalents from year-end levels was primarily due to cash flows from operating activities.
Borrowings under commercial paper programs totaled $25.0 million at both the end of the third quarter of 2004 and at year-end 2003. On July 27, 2004, Snap-on entered into a five-year $400 million multi-currency revolving credit facility that will terminate on July 27, 2009. This $400 million facility replaced the $408 million of multi-currency revolving credit facilities that served to back the companys commercial paper programs, including a $200 million, 364-day revolving credit facility that terminated on July 30, 2004, and a five-year $208 million revolving credit facility that would have terminated on August 20, 2005. The $400 million revolving credit facilitys financial covenant requires that Snap-on maintain a ratio of total debt to the sum of total debt plus shareholders equity of not greater than 0.60 to 1.00. As of the date of this document, Snap-on believes it is in compliance with all covenants of this revolving credit facility.
32
At October 2, 2004, Snap-on also had $20 million of unused committed bank lines of credit, of which $10 million expires on July 31, 2005, and $10 million expires on August 31, 2005.
The following discussion focuses on information included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Cash flow provided from operating activities was $134.2 million in the first nine months of 2004, including a $10.7 million net income tax refund, primarily resulting from a $78.2 million voluntary U.S. pension contribution made in the fourth quarter of 2003. In the third quarter of 2004, Snap-on made a $10.0 million payment to the U.S. Department of Justice pursuant to an agreement to resolve a government audit relating to two contracts with the GSA. Cash flow from operating activities in 2003 was $140.0 million, including a $14.0 million pension plan contribution. The consolidation of SOC as of January 4, 2004, did not have a material impact on cash flow.
Capital expenditures of $25.9 million in the first nine months of 2004 were up from the $18.7 million expended in the first nine months of 2003. Investments primarily included new product-related, quality and cost reduction capital investments, as well as ongoing replacements of manufacturing and distribution facilities and equipment. Snap-on anticipates fiscal 2004 capital expenditures will be in the range of $35 million to $40 million, of which approximately two-thirds is expected to be used for investments relating to new products, quality enhancement or cost reduction. Capital expenditures for the full year of fiscal 2003 totaled $29.4 million.
In the second quarter of 2004, Snap-on sold, at book value, its 70% interest in Texo s.r.l., a European manufacturer and developer of vehicle lifts, for approximately $0.6 million.
Snap-on has undertaken stock repurchases from time to time to offset dilution created by shares issued for employee and dealer stock purchase plans, stock options, and other corporate purposes, as well as to repurchase shares when the company believes market conditions are favorable. Snap-on repurchased 900,000 shares of common stock for $29.4 million under its previously announced share repurchase programs during the first nine months of 2004. As of the end of the third quarter of 2004, Snap-on has remaining availability to repurchase up to an additional $125.1 million in common stock pursuant to the Board of Directorsauthorizations. The purchase of Snap-on common stock is at the companys discretion, subject to prevailing financial and market conditions. The company intends to continue to buy, and has bought, additional shares in the fourth quarter of 2004, such that full year repurchases have exceeded its fiscal 2004 repurchase target of 1,000,000 shares that was publicly announced by press release dated January 21, 2004.
33
Snap-on has paid consecutive quarterly cash dividends, without interruption or decline, since 1939. Cash dividends paid totaled $43.4 million for the first nine months of 2004, as compared to $43.6 million in the first nine months of 2003.
Government Contract Matters:
On July 23, 2004, Snap-on reached an agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice to resolve the government audit, previously discussed in the companys Annual Report and Form 10-K, relating to two contracts with the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA). Snap-on agreed to settle the claims over the interpretation and application of the price reduction and billing provisions of these two contracts for sales from March 1996 through the July 23, 2004, settlement date for $10 million. Snap-on incurred a pretax charge of $3.6 million, or $0.04 per diluted share in the second quarter of 2004 for costs not previously accrued. Snap-on remitted the $10 million cash settlement to the U.S. Department of Justice on August 5, 2004.
Employees:
On August 27, 2004, Snap-on and approximately 70 employees at the company's Natick, Massachusetts, facility ratified a new collective bargaining agreement. The terms of the agreement were not materially different from the previous agreement.
Approximately 125 employees at the companys Johnson City, Tennessee, facility are covered under a collective bargaining agreement that will expire in December 2004. At this time the company cannot predict the outcome of these negotiations.
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004:
On October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act) was signed into law. The company is currently assessing the impact the Act will have on its future effective tax rates and cash tax payments.
Snap-ons disclosures of its critical accounting polices, which are contained in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2004, have not materially change since that report was filed.
34
Snap-on expects full-year 2004 reported earnings to be in the range of $1.35 to $1.45 per diluted share, which is anticipated to include $0.26 per share for continuous improvement costs.
Safe Harbor: Statements in this document that are not historical facts, including statements (i) that include the words expects, targets, plans, estimates, believes, anticipates, or similar words that reference Snap-on or its management; (ii) specifically identified as forward-looking; or (iii) describing Snap-ons or managements future outlook, plans, estimates, objectives or goals, are forward-looking statements. Snap-on or its representatives may also make similar forward-looking statements from time to time orally or in writing. Snap-on cautions the reader that any forward-looking statements included in this document that are based upon assumptions and estimates were developed by management in good faith and that management believes such assumptions and estimates to be reasonable as of the date of this document. However, these statements are subject to risks, uncertainties or other factors, including some events that may not be within the control of the company, that could cause (and in some cases have caused) actual results to differ materially from those described in any such statement.
These risks and uncertainties include, without limit, uncertainties related to estimates, assumptions and projections generally, and the timing and progress with which Snap-on can continue to achieve savings from cost reduction, continuous improvement and other Operational Fitness initiatives; make improvements in supply chain efficiencies; and make effective improvements in machine maintenance, plant productivity and manufacturing line set-up and change-over practices; as well as uncertainties related to the companys capability to retain and attract dealers, effectively implement new programs, capture new business, introduce successful new products and other Profitable Growth initiatives; and its ability to weather disruption arising from planned facility closures, or other labor interruptions. These risks also include uncertainties related to Snap-ons ability to withstand external negative factors including terrorist disruptions on business; potential changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies, regulatory reporting requirements, laws and regulations, or other activities of governments or their agencies, including military actions and such aftermath that might occur; the impact on approximately ten percent of the dealer network and on the companys sales from hurricane activity in the Southern and Eastern coastal regions of the United States and the related impact of decreased sales on the operating income from financial services; and the absence of significant changes in the current competitive environment, inflation, interest rates, legal proceedings, and energy and raw material supply and pricing (including steel), supplier disruptions, currency fluctuations, or the material worsening of economic and political situations around the world, particularly in North America and Europe. In addition, investors should be aware that generally accepted accounting principles prescribe when a company should record an allowance for particular risks, including litigation exposures. Accordingly, results for a given reporting period could be significantly affected if and when an allowance is established for a major contingency. Reported results, therefore, may appear to be volatile in certain accounting periods.
These factors may not constitute all factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in any forward-looking statement. Snap-on operates in a continually changing business environment and new factors emerge from time to time. Snap-on cannot predict such factors nor can it assess the impact, if any, of such factors on Snap-ons financial position or its results of operations. Accordingly, forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a prediction of actual results or regarded as a representation by the company or its management that the projected results will be achieved. Snap-on disclaims any responsibility to update any forward-looking statement provided in this document.
35
Market risk is the potential economic loss that may result from adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments. Snap-on is exposed to market risk from changes in both foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. Snap-on monitors its exposure to these risks and attempts to manage the underlying economic exposures through the use of financial instruments such as forward exchange contracts and interest rate swap agreements. Snap-on does not use derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes. Snap-ons broad-based business activities help to reduce the impact that volatility in any particular area or related areas may have on its operating earnings as a whole. Snap-ons management takes an active role in the risk management process and has developed policies and procedures that require specific administrative and business functions to assist in the identification, assessment and control of various risks.
FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK MANAGEMENT: Snap-on has significant international operations and is subject to certain risks inherent with foreign operations that include fluctuations in currency exchange rates and restrictions on movement of funds. Foreign exchange risk exists to the extent that Snap-on has payment obligations or receipts denominated in currencies other than the functional currency. To manage these exposures, Snap-on identifies naturally offsetting positions and then purchases hedging instruments in an attempt to protect the residual net exposures. Snap-ons financial position and results of operations have not been materially affected by such events to date. For additional information, see Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT: Snap-ons interest rate risk management policies are designed to reduce the potential volatility of earnings that could arise from changes in interest rates. Through the use of interest rate swaps, Snap-on aims to stabilize funding costs by managing the exposure created by the differing maturities and interest rate structures of Snap-ons assets and liabilities. For additional information, see Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Snap-on utilizes a Value-at-Risk (VAR) model to determine the potential one-day loss in the fair value of its interest rate and foreign exchange-sensitive financial instruments from adverse changes in market factors. The VAR model estimates were made assuming normal market conditions and a 95% confidence level. Snap-ons computations are based on the inter-relationships among movements in various currencies and interest rates (variance/co-variance technique). These inter-relationships were determined by observing interest rate and foreign currency market changes over the preceding quarter.
The estimated maximum potential one-day loss in fair value, calculated using the VAR model, at October 2, 2004, was $0.7 million on interest rate-sensitive financial instruments and $0.8 million on foreign currency-sensitive financial instruments. The VAR model is a risk management tool and does not purport to represent actual losses in fair value that will be incurred by Snap-on, nor does it consider the potential effect of favorable changes in market factors.
36
CREDIT RISK: Credit risk is the possibility of loss from a customers failure to make payments according to contract terms. Prior to granting credit, each customer is evaluated, taking into consideration the borrowers financial condition, collateral, debt-servicing capacity, past payment experience, credit bureau information, and other financial and qualitative factors that may affect the borrowers ability to repay. Specific credit reviews and standard industry credit scoring models are used in performing this evaluation. Loans that have been granted are typically monitored through an asset-quality-review process that closely monitors past due accounts and initiates collection actions when appropriate. In addition to its direct credit risk exposure, Snap-on also has credit risk exposure for certain SOC loan originations with recourse provisions against Snap-on. At October 2, 2004, $9.5 million of loans originated by SOC have a recourse provision to Snap-on if the loans become more than 90 days past due. For additional information on SOC, see Note 2.
ECONOMIC RISK: Economic risk is the possibility of loss resulting from economic instability in certain areas of the world. Snap-on continually monitors its exposure in these markets. Snap-ons Commercial and Industrial Group includes a hand-tool manufacturing facility in Argentina with net assets of approximately $10.6 million as of October 2, 2004. Due to economic instability in Argentina, Snap-on resized its operations there in 2001 and will continue to assess Argentinas economic situation to determine if any future actions or impairment write-downs are warranted.
As a result of the above market, credit and economic risks, net income and revenues in any particular period may not be representative of full-year results and may vary significantly from year to year and from quarter to quarter. Inflation has not had a significant impact on the company.
37
Quarterly Controls Evaluation and Related CEO and CFO Certifications
Snap-on conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (Disclosure Controls) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report. The controls evaluation was done under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO).
Attached as exhibits to this Quarterly Report are certifications of the CEO and the CFO, which are required in accordance with Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). This Controls and Procedures section includes information concerning the controls evaluation referred to in the certifications and it should be read in conjunction with the certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.
Definition of Disclosure Controls
Disclosure Controls are controls and other procedures designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act, such as this Quarterly Report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure Controls are also designed to reasonably assure that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Disclosure Controls include components of internal control over financial reporting, which consists of control processes designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. To the extent that components of internal control over financial reporting are included within the Disclosure Controls, they are included in the scope of the companys quarterly evaluation of Disclosure Controls.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
The companys management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that the companys Disclosure Controls or its internal control over financial reporting will prevent all error or fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control systems objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must consider the benefits of the controls in relation to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
38
Scope of the Controls Evaluation
The evaluation of the companys Disclosure Controls included a review of the controls objectives and design, the companys implementation of the controls and the effect of the controls on the information generated for use in this Quarterly Report. In the course of the controls evaluation, management sought to identify data errors, controls problems or acts of fraud and confirm that appropriate corrective action, including process improvements, were being undertaken. This type of evaluation is performed on a quarterly basis so that the conclusions of management, including the CEO and CFO, concerning controls effectiveness can be reported in the companys Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and to supplement the companys disclosures made in its Annual Report on Form 10-K. Many of the components of the Disclosure Controls are also evaluated on an ongoing basis by the companys Internal Audit Department and by other personnel in the Finance organization, as well as by independent auditors who evaluate them in connection with determining their auditing procedures related to their report on Snap-ons annual financial statements and not to provide assurance on controls. The overall goals of these various evaluation activities are to monitor Disclosure Controls, and to modify them as necessary; managements intent is to maintain the Disclosure Controls as dynamic systems that change as conditions warrant.
Among other matters, management also considered whether its evaluation identified any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, and whether the company had identified any acts of fraud involving personnel with a significant role in internal control over financial reporting. This information was important both for the controls evaluation generally, and because item 5 in the certifications of the CEO and CFO requires that the CEO and CFO disclose that information to the companys Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and to the companys independent auditors. In the professional auditing literature, significant deficiencies are referred to as reportable conditions, which are deficiencies in the design or operation of controls that could adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data in the financial statements. Auditing literature defines material weakness as a particularly serious reportable condition where the internal control does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud may occur in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements and the risk that such misstatements would not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Management also sought to address other controls matters in the controls evaluation, and in each case if a problem was identified, management considered what revision, improvement and/or correction to make in accordance with its ongoing procedures.
Conclusions
Based upon the controls evaluation, Snap-ons CEO and CFO have concluded that, subject to the limitations noted above, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report, that the companys Disclosure Controls were effective to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to Snap-on and its consolidated subsidiaries is made known to management, including the CEO and CFO.
There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended October 2, 2004, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Snap-ons internal control over financial reporting.
39
Please refer to Note 13 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding legal proceedings.
The following chart discloses information regarding the shares of Snap-ons common stock repurchased by the company during the third quarter of fiscal 2004, all of which were purchased pursuant to Board of Directors authorizations that the company has publicly announced. Snap-on has undertaken stock repurchases from time to time to offset dilution created by shares issued for employee and dealer stock purchase plans, stock options, and other corporate purposes, as well as to repurchase shares when the company believes market conditions are favorable. The repurchase of Snap-on common stock is at the companys discretion, subject to prevailing financial and market conditions.
Period |
Total Number of Shares Purchased |
Average Price Paid Per Share |
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
Approximate Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans(1) |
July 4, 2004 to |
||||
July 31, 2004 | -- | N/A | -- | $128.3 million |
August 1, 2004 to | ||||
August 28, 2004 | 150,000 | $31.92 | 150,000 | $124.2 million |
August 29, 2004 to | ||||
October 2, 2004 | -- | N/A | -- | $125.1 million |
Total/Average |
150,000 | $31.92 | 150,000 | N/A |
(1) | Subject to further adjustment pursuant to the 1996 Authorization described below, as of October 2, 2004, the approximate value of shares that may yet be purchased pursuant to the three outstanding Board of Directors authorizations discussed below is $125.1 million. |
| In its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 1996, the company disclosed that the companys Board authorized the company to repurchase shares of the companys common stock from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions (the 1996 Authorization). The 1996 Authorization allows the repurchase of up to the number of shares issued or delivered from treasury from time to time under the various plans the company has in place that call for the issuance of the companys common stock. Because the number of shares that are purchased pursuant to the 1996 Authorization will change from time to time as (i) the company issues shares under its various plans and (ii) shares are repurchased pursuant to this authorization, the number of shares authorized to be repurchased will vary from time to time. The 1996 Authorization will expire when terminated by the companys Board. When calculating the approximate value of shares that the company may yet purchase under the 1996 Authorization, the company assumed a price of $32.11, $32.04 and $28.72 per share of common stock as of the end of the fiscal 2004 months ended July 31, August 28 and October 2 respectively. |
40
| By press release dated June 29, 1998, the company announced that the companys Board authorized the repurchase of an aggregate of $100 million of the companys common stock (the 1998 Authorization). The 1998 Authorization will expire when the aggregate repurchase price limit is met, unless terminated earlier by the companys Board. |
| By press release dated February 3, 1999, the company announced that the companys Board authorized the repurchase of an aggregate of $50 million of the companys common stock (the 1999 Authorization). The 1999 Authorization will expire when the aggregate repurchase price limit is met, unless terminated earlier by the companys Board. |
These repurchases are being made pursuant to the three Board authorizations discussed above. During the first nine months of 2004, the company repurchased 900,000 shares of common stock in connection with this announcement. The company intends to continue to buy, and has bought, additional shares in the fourth quarter of 2004, such that full year repurchases have exceeded its fiscal 2004 repurchase target of 1,000,000 shares that was publicly announced by press release dated January 21, 2004.
41
Exhibit 10.1 | Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Amended and Restated Snap-on Incorporated 2001 Incentive Stock and Awards Plan |
Exhibit 10.2 | Five Year Credit Agreement between Snap-on Incorporated, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Citibank, N.A. |
Exhibit 12 | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
Exhibit 31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
Exhibit 31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
Exhibit 32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Exhibit 32.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
42
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Snap-on Incorporated has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned duly authorized person.
SNAP-ON INCORPORATED | |
Date: November 8, 2004 |
/s/ Martin M. Ellen |
Martin M. Ellen, Principal Financial Officer, | |
Chief Financial Officer, | |
Senior Vice President - Finance |
43
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | Exhibit |
10.1 | Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Amended and Restated Snap-on Incorporated 2001 Incentive Stock and Awards Plan |
10.2 | Five Year Credit Agreement between Snap-on Incorporated, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Citibank, N.A. |
12 | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
44