UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
(X) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003
( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _____________ to _____________
Commission File Number 0-24763
REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 59-3429602
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) identification No.)
121 West Forsyth Street, Suite 200 (904) 598-7000
Jacksonville, Florida 32202 (Registrant's telephone No.)
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
(Title of Class)
Not Applicable
(Name of exchange on which registered)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Class B Units of Partnership Interest
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. YES (X) NO ( )
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. (X)
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by
non-affiliates of the Registrant and the number of shares of Registrant's voting
common stock outstanding is not applicable.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Regency Centers Corporation is the general partner of Regency Centers, L.P.
Portions of Regency Centers Corporation's Proxy Statement in connection with its
2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Form 10-K
Item No. Report Page
- ------- -----------
PART I
1. Business...........................................................1
2. Properties.........................................................4
3. Legal Proceedings.................................................13
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders...............13
PART II
5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Shareholder Matters...............................................13
6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data..............................14
7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations.........................................15
7a. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk........25
8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data..........25
9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure..........................................25
9a. Controls and Procedures...........................................25
PART III
10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant................26
11. Executive Compensation............................................26
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management....27
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions....................27
14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services............................27
PART IV
15. Exhibits, Financial Statements, Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K.28
Forward Looking Statements
- --------------------------
In addition to historical information, the following information
contains forward-looking statements as defined under federal securities laws.
These statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections
about the industry and markets in which Regency operates, and management's
beliefs and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future
performance and involve certain known and unknown risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied
by such statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited
to, changes in national and local economic conditions; financial difficulties of
tenants; competitive market conditions, including pricing of acquisitions and
sales of properties and out-parcels; changes in expected leasing activity and
market rents; timing of acquisitions, development starts and sales of properties
and out-parcels; weather; the ability to obtain governmental approvals; and
meeting development schedules. The following discussion should be read in
conjunction with the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes
thereto of Regency Centers, L.P. appearing elsewhere within.
PART I
Item 1. Business
Operating and Investment Philosophy
Regency Centers Corporation ("Regency" or the "Company") is a qualified
real estate investment trust ("REIT"), which began operations in 1993. Our
primary operating and investment goal is long-term growth in earnings per share
and total shareholder return by focusing on a strategy of owning and operating
grocery anchored shopping centers that are anchored by market-leading
supermarkets, and that are located in areas with attractive demographics.
Currently, our real estate investments before depreciation total $3.2
billion with 265 shopping centers in 22 states. At December 31, 2003, our gross
leasable area ("GLA") totaled 30.3 million square feet and was 92.2% leased.
Geographically, 19.6% of our GLA is located in Florida, 19.5% in California,
16.8% in Texas, 6.6% in Georgia, 6.3% in Ohio, and 31.2% spread throughout 17
other states. We own and operate our shopping centers through our operating
partnership, Regency Centers, L.P. ("RCLP" or "Partnership"), in which we
currently own 98% of the operating partnership units. Regency's operating,
investing and financing activities are generally performed by RCLP.
We earn revenues and generate operating cash flow by leasing space to
grocers and retail side-shop tenants in our shopping centers. We experience
growth in revenues by increasing occupancy and rental rates at currently owned
shopping centers, and by developing new shopping centers. A neighborhood center
is a convenient, cost-effective distribution platform for food retailers.
Grocery anchored centers generate substantial daily traffic and offer
sustainable competitive advantages to their tenants. This high traffic generates
increased sales, thereby driving higher occupancy, rental rates and rental-rate
growth for Regency, which we expect to sustain our growth in earnings per share
and increase the value of our portfolio over the long term.
We seek a range of strong national, regional and local specialty
tenants, for the same reason that we choose to anchor our centers with leading
grocers. We have created a formal partnering process -- the Premier Customer
Initiative ("PCI") -- to promote mutually beneficial relationships with our
non-grocer specialty retailers. The objective of PCI is for Regency to build a
base of specialty tenants who represent the "best-in-class" operators in their
respective merchandising categories. Such tenants reinforce the consumer appeal
and other strengths of a center's grocery anchor, help to stabilize a center's
occupancy, reduce re-leasing downtime, reduce tenant turnover and yield higher
sustainable rents.
We primarily grow our shopping center portfolio through new shopping
center development, where we acquire the land and construct the building.
Development is customer-driven, meaning we generally have an executed lease from
the anchor before we start construction. Developments serve the growth needs of
our grocery and specialty retail customers, result in modern shopping centers
with long-term leases from the grocery anchors and produce attractive returns on
our invested capital. This development process can require up to 36 months from
initial land or redevelopment acquisition through construction, lease-up and
stabilization of rental income, depending upon the size of the project.
Generally, anchor tenants begin operating their stores prior to construction
completion of the entire center, resulting in rental income during the
development phase.
We intend to maintain a conservative capital structure to fund our
growth programs without compromising our investment-grade ratings. Our approach
is founded on our self-funding business model. This model utilizes
1
center "recycling" as a key component. Our recycling strategy calls for us to
re-deploy the proceeds from the sales of properties into new higher quality
developments that we expect to generate sustainable revenue growth and more
attractive returns on invested capital. Our commitment to maintaining a high-
quality shopping center portfolio dictates that we continually assess the value
of all of our properties and sell those that no longer meet our long-term
investment standards.
Joint venturing of shopping centers also provides us with a capital
source for new development, as well as the opportunity to earn fees for asset
and property management services. As asset manager, we are engaged by our
partners to apply similar operating, investment, and capital strategies to the
portfolios owned by the joint ventures. Joint ventures grow their shopping
center investments through acquisitions from third parties or direct purchases
of shopping centers from Regency. Although selling properties to joint ventures
reduces our ownership interest, we continue to share in the risks and rewards of
centers that meet our long-term investment strategy. Regency is not subject to
liability and has no obligations or guarantees of the joint ventures beyond its
ownership percentage.
Risk Factors Relating to Ownership of Regency Common Stock
We are subject to certain business risks that could affect our industry
which include, among others:
o increased competition from super-centers such as Wal-Mart could result in
grocery anchor closings or consolidations in the grocery store industry
which could reduce our cash flow;
o a slow down in our shopping center development program would reduce our
operating revenues and gains from sales;
o the bankruptcy or insolvency of, or a downturn in the business of, any of
our major tenants could reduce our cash flow,
o the possibility that major tenants will not renew their leases as they
expire or renew at lower rental rates could reduce our cash flow,
o the internet and e-commerce could reduce the demand for tenants to occupy
our shopping centers,
o vacant anchor space could affect the entire shopping center because of the
loss of the anchor's customer drawing power,
o poor market conditions could create an over supply of space or a reduction
in demand for our shopping centers,
o risks relating to leverage, including uncertainty that we will be able to
refinance our indebtedness, and the risk of higher interest rates,
o our inability to satisfy our cash requirements from operations and the
possibility that we may be required to borrow funds to meet distribution
requirements in order to maintain our qualification as a REIT,
o potential liability for unknown or future environmental matters and costs
of compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act,
o the risk of uninsured losses, and
o unfavorable economic conditions could also result in the inability of
tenants in certain retail sectors to meet their lease obligations and could
adversely affect our ability to attract and retain desirable tenants.
2
Compliance with Governmental Regulations
Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and
regulations, we may be liable for the cost to remove or remediate certain
hazardous or toxic substances at our shopping centers. These laws often impose
liability without regard to whether the owner knew of, or was responsible for,
the presence of the hazardous or toxic substances. The cost of required
remediation and the owner's liability for remediation could exceed the value of
the property and/or the aggregate assets of the owner. The presence of such
substances, or the failure to properly remediate such substances, may adversely
affect the owner's ability to sell or rent the property or borrow using the
property as collateral. We have a number of properties that could require or are
currently undergoing varying levels of environmental remediation. Environmental
remediation is not currently expected to have a material financial effect on us
due to reserves for remediation, insurance programs designed to mitigate the
cost of remediation and various state-regulated programs that shift the
responsibility and cost to the state.
Competition
We are among the largest publicly-held owners of grocery-anchored
shopping centers in the nation based on revenues, number of properties, gross
leaseable area and market capitalization. There are numerous companies and
private individuals engaged in the ownership, development, acquisition and
operation of shopping centers which compete with us in our targeted markets.
This results in competition for attracting grocery anchor tenants, as well as,
the acquisition of existing shopping centers and new development sites. We
believe that the principal competitive factors in attracting tenants in our
market areas are location, demographics, rental costs, tenant mix, property age
and maintenance. We believe that our competitive advantages include our
locations within our market areas, our strong demographics surrounding our
shopping centers, our relationships with our grocery anchor tenants and
side-shop retailers, our PCI program which allows us to provide retailers with
multiple locations, our practice of maintaining and renovating of our shopping
centers, and our ability to source and develop new shopping centers.
Changes in Policies
Our Board of Directors establishes the policies that govern our
investment and operating strategies including, among others, development and
acquisition of shopping centers, tenant and market focus, debt and equity
financing policies, quarterly distributions to shareholders, and REIT tax
status. The Board of Directors may amend these policies at any time without a
vote of our shareholders.
Employees
Our headquarters are located at 121 West Forsyth Street, Suite 200,
Jacksonville, Florida. We presently maintain nineteen offices in thirteen states
where we conduct management, leasing, construction, and investment activities.
At December 31, 2003, we had 385 employees and we believe that our relations
with our employees are good.
Company Website Access and SEC Filings
The Company's website may be accessed at www.regencycenters.com. All of
our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission can be accessed through
our website promptly after filing; however, in the event that the website is
inaccessible, then we will provide paper copies of our most recent annual report
on Form 10-K, the four previous quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current
reports filed or furnished on Form 8-K, and all related amendments, excluding
exhibits, free of charge upon request.
3
Item 2. Properties
A list of our shopping centers summarized by state and in order of
largest holdings follows based upon gross leaseable area (GLA), including those
properties that we partially own in joint ventures:
December 31, 2003 December 31, 2002
----------------- -----------------
Location # Properties GLA % Leased # Properties GLA % Leased
-------- ------------ --- -------- ------------ --- --------
Florida 50 5,943,345 94.3% 53 6,193,550 90.9%
California 49 5,917,372 90.8% 43 5,125,030 91.4%
Texas 41 5,086,086 88.1% 40 5,123,197 88.1%
Georgia 20 2,008,066 95.8% 24 2,437,712 93.2%
Ohio 14 1,901,538 90.6% 14 1,901,684 91.4%
Colorado 14 1,623,674 94.2% 15 1,538,570 88.5%
Virginia 10 1,272,369 89.1% 7 872,796 92.4%
North Carolina 10 1,050,061 98.7% 12 1,225,201 97.6%
Washington 9 1,020,470 96.4% 9 986,374 98.8%
Oregon 8 838,715 92.2% 9 822,115 93.7%
Arizona 7 652,906 91.5% 6 525,701 95.9%
Alabama 6 543,330 85.5% 7 644,896 90.4%
Tennessee 6 444,234 96.5% 6 444,234 95.3%
Illinois 3 408,211 97.0% 2 300,477 96.1%
Michigan 4 368,260 87.2% 3 279,265 92.6%
South Carolina 5 339,926 95.7% 5 339,256 85.6%
Kentucky 3 323,029 97.8% 2 304,659 96.6%
Delaware 2 240,418 99.5% 2 240,418 99.0%
Maryland 1 188,243 90.2% - - -
New Jersey 1 88,993 89.4% 1 88,993 79.7%
Missouri 1 82,498 91.5% 1 82,498 92.9%
Pennsylvania 1 6,000 100.0% 1 6,000 100.0%
----------------- --------------- ---------------- ---------------- --------------- ---------------
Total 265 30,347,744 92.2% 262 29,482,626 91.5%
================= =============== ================ ================ =============== ===============
4
Item 2. Properties (continued)
The following table summarizes the largest tenants occupying our
shopping centers based upon a percentage of total annualized base rent exceeding
..5%. The table includes 100% of the GLA in unconsolidated joint ventures.
Annualized base rent includes only Regency's pro-rata share of rent from
unconsolidated joint ventures.
Summary of Principal Tenants > .5% of Annualized Base Rent
(including Properties Under Development)
Percentage to Percentage of Number of Anchor
Company Annualized Leased Owned
Tenant GLA Owned GLA Rent Base Rent Stores Stores (a)
------ --- --------- ----- ---------- ------ ----------
Kroger 3,537,464 11.7% 25,237,925 8.19% 59 2
Publix 2,453,698 8.1% 15,750,025 5.11% 53 -
Safeway 1,859,823 6.1% 14,890,904 4.83% 38 9
Albertsons 907,579 3.0% 7,234,838 2.35% 17 7
Blockbuster 377,768 1.2% 6,464,705 2.10% 67 -
H.E.B. Grocery 417,151 1.4% 4,497,612 1.46% 5 -
Kohl's Department Store 266,621 0.9% 3,079,752 1.00% 3 -
Harris Teeter 244,499 0.8% 2,914,612 0.95% 5 -
Winn Dixie 427,138 1.4% 2,830,716 0.92% 8 -
Walgreens 239,776 0.8% 2,710,122 0.88% 17 -
Washington Mutual Bank 121,072 0.4% 2,518,022 0.82% 32 -
Shoppers Food
Warehouse/Supervalu 183,364 0.6% 2,252,476 0.73% 3 -
Hallmark 177,996 0.6% 2,207,533 0.72% 41 -
Starbucks 81,337 0.3% 1,802,265 0.58% 53 -
Long's Drugs 235,620 0.8% 1,774,785 0.58% 10 -
Hollywood Video 101,018 0.3% 1,771,981 0.57% 16 -
Circuit City 116,860 0.4% 1,764,956 0.57% 4 -
Eckerd (JC Penney) 179,758 0.6% 1,743,619 0.57% 19 -
The UPS Store 112,496 0.4% 1,724,476 0.56% 79 -
Subway 85,764 0.3% 1,684,041 0.55% 69 -
Target 240,086 0.8% 1,589,996 0.52% 2 7
Petco 131,791 0.4% 1,570,386 0.51% 10 -
(a) Includes stores owned by anchor tenant that are attached to our
centers.
Regency's leases have terms generally ranging from three to five years
for tenant space under 5,000 square feet. Leases greater than 10,000 square feet
generally have lease terms in excess of five years, mostly comprised of anchor
tenants. Many of the anchor leases contain provisions allowing the tenant the
option of extending the term of the lease at expiration. The leases provide for
the monthly payment in advance of fixed minimum rentals, additional rents
calculated as a percentage of the tenant's sales, the tenant's pro rata share of
real estate taxes, insurance, and common area maintenance expenses, and
reimbursement for utility costs if not directly metered.
5
Item 2. Properties (continued)
The following table sets forth a schedule of lease expirations for the
next ten years, assuming no tenants renew their leases:
Future
Percent of Minimum Percent of
Lease Total Rent Total
Expiration Expiring Company Expiring Minimum
Year GLA GLA Leases Rent (2)
---- --- --- ------ --------
(1) 322,042 1.2% $ 3,880,966 1.3%
2004 1,625,183 6.2% 24,355,651 8.4%
2005 2,263,752 8.6% 31,345,630 10.8%
2006 2,783,551 10.5% 36,727,598 12.6%
2007 2,893,652 11.0% 36,032,344 12.4%
2008 2,763,394 10.5% 34,672,055 11.9%
2009 1,207,559 4.6% 12,965,696 4.4%
2010 1,006,797 3.8% 10,187,595 3.5%
2011 1,071,215 4.1% 11,204,815 3.8%
2012 1,207,362 4.6% 12,608,744 4.3%
2013 782,478 3.0% 9,911,026 3.4%
--------------------------------------------------------------
10 Yr. Total 17,926,985 67.9% $ 223,892,120 76.8%
--------------------------------------------------------------
(1) leased currently under month to month rent or in process of renewal
(2) total minimum rent includes current minimum rent and future contractual rent
steps for all properties, but excludes additional rent such as percentage
rent, common area maintenance, real estate taxes and insurance
reimbursements
See the property table below and also see Item 7, Management's
Discussion and Analysis for further information about Regency's properties.
6
Year Gross
Property Name Year Con- Leasable Percent
Acquired structed(1) Area (GLA) Leased (2) Grocery Anchor
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FLORIDA
Ft. Myers / Cape Coral
- ----------------------
Grande Oak 2000 2000 78,784 100.0% Publix
Jacksonville / North Florida
- ----------------------------
Anastasia Plaza (5) 1993 1988 102,342 91.3% Publix
Beneva Village Shops 1998 1987 141,532 94.9% Publix
Bolton Plaza 1994 1988 172,938 94.3% --
Carriage Gate 1994 1978 76,833 95.6% --
Courtyard Shopping Center 1993 1987 137,256 100.0% Albertson's (4)
Fleming Island 1998 2000 136,662 98.3% Publix
Highland Square (5) 1998 1999 262,194 98.8% Publix/Winn-Dixie
John's Creek Shopping Center (3) 2003 2004 90,041 49.8% Publix
Julington Village (5) 1999 1999 81,821 100.0% Publix
Lynnhaven (5) 2001 2001 63,871 100.0% Publix
Millhopper 1993 1974 84,065 98.5% Publix
Newberry Square 1994 1986 180,524 96.5% Publix
Ocala Corners (5) 2000 2000 86,772 100.0% Publix
Old St. Augustine Plaza 1996 1990 175,459 99.4% Publix
Palm Harbor Shopping Village (5) 1996 1991 172,758 99.7% Publix
Pine Tree Plaza 1997 1999 60,787 100.0% Publix
Regency Court 1997 1992 218,649 99.4% --
Starke 2000 2000 12,738 100.0% --
Vineyard Shopping Center (3) 2001 2002 62,821 83.8% Publix
Miami / Ft. Lauderdale
- ----------------------
Aventura Shopping Center 1994 1974 102,876 89.5% Publix
Berkshire Commons 1994 1992 106,354 98.6% Publix
Garden Square 1997 1991 90,258 97.5% Publix
Palm Trails Plaza 1997 1998 76,067 100.0% Winn-Dixie
Pebblebrook Plaza (5) 2000 2000 76,767 100.0% Publix
Shoppes @ 104 (5) 1998 1990 108,192 98.7% Winn-Dixie
University Marketplace 1993 1990 129,121 93.3% Albertson's (4)
Welleby 1996 1982 109,949 98.9% Publix
Tampa / Orlando
- ---------------
Bloomingdale 1998 1987 267,935 99.6% Publix
East Towne Shopping Center (3) 2002 2003 69,841 78.2% Publix
Kings Crossing Sun City (5) 1999 1999 75,020 100.0% Publix
Mainstreet Square 1997 1988 107,134 87.7% Winn-Dixie
Mariners Village 1997 1986 133,440 96.4% Winn-Dixie
Marketplace St. Pete 1995 1983 90,296 98.8% Publix
Peachland Promenade 1995 1991 82,082 94.1% Publix
Regency Square Brandon 1993 1986 349,848 95.5% --
Regency Village (3), (5) 2000 2002 83,170 87.5% Publix
Town Square 1997 1999 44,679 97.5% --
University Collection 1996 1984 106,899 95.3% Kash N Karry (4)
Village Center 6 1995 1993 181,110 98.5% Publix
Willa Springs Shopping Center 2000 2000 89,930 100.0% Publix
West Palm Beach / Treasure Coast
- --------------------------------
Boynton Lakes Plaza 1997 1993 130,924 100.0% Winn-Dixie
Chasewood Plaza 1993 1986 155,603 96.6% Publix
East Port Plaza 1997 1991 235,842 56.3% Publix
Martin Downs Village Center 1993 1985 121,946 100.0% --
Martin Downs Village Shoppes 1993 1998 49,773 86.3% --
Ocean Breeze 1993 1985 108,209 83.6% Publix
Shops of San Marco (5) 2002 2002 91,537 100.0% Publix
Town Center at Martin Downs 1996 1996 64,546 100.0% Publix
Wellington Town Square 1996 1982 105,150 94.2% Publix
--------------------
Subtotal/ Weighted Average (FL) 5,943,345 94.3%
--------------------
CALIFORNIA
Los Angeles / Southern CA
- -------------------------
Alameda Bridgeside Shopping Center (3) 2003 2004 103,510 56.7% Nob Hill
Amerige Heights Town Center (5) 2000 2000 96,679 100.0% Albertson's
Bear Creek Village Center (3) 2003 2004 81,219 65.6% Stater Brother
Campus Marketplace (5) 2000 2000 144,288 100.0% Ralph's
Costa Verde 1999 1988 178,622 100.0% Albertson's
El Camino 1999 1995 135,883 100.0% Von's Food & Drug
El Norte Parkway Pla 1999 1984 87,990 82.5% Von's Food & Drug
Falcon Ridge (3) 2003 2004 245,857 21.3% Stater Brothers
Friars Mission 1999 1989 146,897 100.0% Ralph's
Property Name Drug Store & Other Anchors > 10,000 Square Feet
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FLORIDA
Ft. Myers / Cape Coral
- ----------------------
Grande Oak --
Jacksonville / North Florida
- ----------------------------
Anastasia Plaza (5) --
Beneva Village Shops Walgreens, Bealls, Harbor Freight Tools
Bolton Plaza Wal-Mart
Carriage Gate Leon County Tax Collector, TJ Maxx
Courtyard Shopping Center Target
Fleming Island Stein Mart
Highland Square (5) Eckerd, Bailey's Powerhouse Gym, Beall's Outlet, Big Lots
John's Creek Shopping Center (3) --
Julington Village (5) --
Lynnhaven (5) --
Millhopper Eckerd, Jo-Ann Fabrics
Newberry Square Jo-Ann Fabrics, K-Mart
Ocala Corners (5) --
Old St. Augustine Plaza Eckerd, Burlington Coat Factory
Palm Harbor Shopping Village (5) Eckerd, Bealls
Pine Tree Plaza --
Regency Court Comp Usa, Office Depot, Recreational Factory Warehouse, Sofa Express, Sports Authority
Starke Eckerd
Vineyard Shopping Center (3) --
Miami / Ft. Lauderdale
- ----------------------
Aventura Shopping Center Eckerd
Berkshire Commons Walgreens
Garden Square Eckerd
Palm Trails Plaza --
Pebblebrook Plaza (5) Walgreens
Shoppes @ 104 (5) Navarro Discount Pharmacies
University Marketplace Beverly's Pet Center, Cafe Iguana Hollywood, Plej's
Welleby Bealls
Tampa / Orlando
- ---------------
Bloomingdale Ace Hardware, Bealls, Wal-Mart
East Towne Shopping Center (3) --
Kings Crossing Sun City (5) --
Mainstreet Square Walgreens
Mariners Village Walgreens, La Fitness
Marketplace St. Pete Dollar World
Peachland Promenade --
Regency Square Brandon AMC Theatre, Dollar Tree, Marshalls, Michaels, S & K Famous Brands, Shoe Carnival,
Staples, TJ Maxx
Regency Village (3), (5) Walgreens
Town Square Petco, Pier 1 Imports
University Collection Eckerd, Dockside Imports, Jo-Ann Fabrics
Village Center 6 Walgreens, Stein Mart
Willa Springs Shopping Center --
West Palm Beach / Treasure Coast
- --------------------------------
Boynton Lakes Plaza World Gym
Chasewood Plaza Bealls, Books-A-Million
East Port Plaza Walgreens
Martin Downs Village Center Bealls, Coastal Care
Martin Downs Village Shoppes Walgreens
Ocean Breeze Beall's Outlet, Coastal Care
Shops of San Marco (5) Walgreens
Town Center at Martin Downs --
Wellington Town Square Eckerd
Subtotal/ Weighted Average (FL)
CALIFORNIA
Los Angeles / Southern CA
- -------------------------
Alameda Bridgeside Shopping Center (3) --
Amerige Heights Town Center (5) Target (4)
Bear Creek Village Center (3) --
Campus Marketplace (5) Long's Drug, Discovery Isle Child Development Center
Costa Verde Bookstar
El Camino Sav-On Drugs
El Norte Parkway Pla --
Falcon Ridge (3) Target (4)
Friars Mission Long's Drug
7
Year Gross
Year Con- Leasable Percent
Property Name Acquired structed(1) Area (GLA) Leased (2) Grocery Anchor
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CALIFORNIA
Los Angeles / Southern CA
- -------------------------
(continued)
Garden Village Shopping Center (5) 2000 2000 112,852 100.0% Albertson's
Gelson's Westlake Market Plaza 2002 2002 84,468 84.7% Gelsons
Hasley Canyon Village (3) 2003 2003 69,800 81.0% Ralph's
Heritage Plaza 1999 1981 231,602 98.9% Ralph's
Hermosa Beach (3), (5) 2003 2003 13,212 100.0% --
Morningside Plaza 1999 1996 91,600 100.0% Stater Brother
Newland Center 1999 1985 149,174 100.0% Albertson's
Oakbrook Plaza 1999 1982 83,279 98.2% Albertson's
Park Plaza Shopping Center (5) 2001 1991 193,529 91.8% Von's Food & Drug
Plaza Hermosa 1999 1984 94,940 100.0% Von's Food & Drug
Rona Plaza 1999 1989 51,754 100.0% Food 4 Less
Rosecrans & Inglewood 2002 2002 12,000 100.0% --
Santa Ana Downtown 1999 1987 100,305 98.8% Food 4 Less
Seal Beach (5) 2002 1966 74,215 98.9% Safeway (4)
Torrance Strouds 2002 2002 13,435 100.0% --
Twin Peaks 1999 1988 198,139 97.9% Albertson's
Valencia Crossroads (3) 2002 2003 180,517 100.0% Whole Foods
Ventura Village 1999 1984 76,070 100.0% Von's Food & Drug
Victoria Gateway Center (3) 2003 2004 97,862 34.6% --
Vista Village Phase I & II (3) 2002 2003 164,262 84.7% --
Westlake Village Center 1999 1975 190,525 97.0% Von's Food & Drug
Westridge (3) 2001 2003 97,286 95.9% Albertson's
Woodman Van Nuys 1999 1992 107,614 100.0% Gigante
San Francisco / Northern CA
- ---------------------------
Blossom Valley 1999 1990 93,315 94.4% Safeway
Clayton Valley (3) 2003 2004 236,683 83.2% Safeway
Corral Hollow (5) 2000 2000 167,118 100.0% Safeway
Diablo Plaza 1999 1982 63,214 100.0% Safeway (4)
El Cerrito Plaza (5) 2000 2000 255,953 96.3% Albertson's (4)
/Trader Joe's
Encina Grande 1999 1965 102,499 93.8% Safeway
Folsom Prairie City Crossing 1999 1999 93,134 91.3% Safeway
Gilroy (3) 2002 2003 334,409 89.6% --
Loehmanns Plaza 1999 1983 113,310 100.0% Safeway (4)
Powell Street Plaza 2001 1987 165,928 98.1% Trader Joe's
San Leandro 1999 1982 50,432 100.0% Safeway (4)
Sequoia Station 1999 1996 103,148 100.0% Safeway (4)
Strawflower Village 1999 1985 78,827 100.0% Safeway
Tassajara Crossing 1999 1990 146,188 100.0% Safeway
The Shops of Santa Barbara 2003 2004 35,135 81.8% --
West Park Plaza 1999 1996 88,103 100.0% Safeway
Woodside Central 1999 1993 80,591 100.0% --
--------------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average (CA) 5,917,372 90.8%
--------------------
TEXAS
Austin
- ------
Hancock 1999 1998 410,438 96.8% H.E.B.
Market at Round Rock 1999 1987 123,046 95.8% Albertson's
North Hills 1999 1995 144,019 100.0% H.E.B.
Dallas / Ft. Worth
- ------------------
Addison Town Center (5) 2003 1993 183,983 79.2% Kroger
Arapaho Village 1999 1997 103,033 82.8% Tom Thumb
Bethany Park Place 1998 1998 74,066 100.0% Kroger
Casa Linda Plaza 1999 1997 324,639 85.1% Albertson's
Cooper Street 1999 1992 133,196 100.0% --
Creekside (5) 1998 1998 101,016 98.6% Kroger
Hebron Park (5) 1999 1999 46,800 88.0% Albertson's (4)
Hillcrest Village 1999 1991 14,530 100.0% --
Keller Town Center 1999 1999 114,937 96.7% Tom Thumb
Lebanon/Legacy Center (3) 2000 2002 56,669 64.7% Albertson's (4)
MacArthur Park Phase II (5) 1999 1999 198,443 100.0% Kroger
Main Street Center (3) 2002 2002 42,821 70.1% Albertson's (4)
Market at Preston Forest 1999 1990 90,171 100.0% Tom Thumb
Matlock Center 2000 2000 40,068 91.8% Wal-Mart (4)
Mills Pointe 1999 1986 126,186 85.3% Tom Thumb
Mockingbird Common 1999 1987 120,321 91.1% Tom Thumb
Northview Plaza 1999 1991 116,016 90.3% Kroger
Property Name Drug Store & Other Anchors > 10,000 Square Feet
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CALIFORNIA
Los Angeles / Southern CA
- -------------------------
(continued)
Garden Village Shopping Center (5) Rite Aid
Gelson's Westlake Market Plaza --
Hasley Canyon Village (3) --
Heritage Plaza Sav-On Drugs, Hands On Bicycles, Inc., Total Woman Gym & Day Spa, Ace Hardware
Hermosa Beach (3), (5) Sav-On Drugs
Morningside Plaza --
Newland Center --
Oakbrook Plaza Long's Drug
Park Plaza Shopping Center (5) Sav-On Drugs, Petco, Ross Dress For Less
Plaza Hermosa Sav-On Drugs
Rona Plaza --
Rosecrans & Inglewood --
Santa Ana Downtown Famsa, Inc.
Seal Beach (5) Sav-On Drugs
Torrance Strouds --
Twin Peaks Target
Valencia Crossroads (3) Kohl's
Ventura Village --
Victoria Gateway Center (3) Circuit City
Vista Village Phase I & II (3) Krikorian Theatres, Staples (4)
Westlake Village Center Sav-On Drugs
Westridge (3) Beverages & More!
Woodman Van Nuys --
San Francisco / Northern CA
- ---------------------------
Blossom Valley Long's Drug
Clayton Valley (3) Long's Drugs, Dollar Tree, Yardbirds Home Center
Corral Hollow (5) Long's Drug, Orchard Supply & Hardware
Diablo Plaza Long's Drug, Jo-Ann Fabrics
El Cerrito Plaza (5) Long's Drug, Bed Bath & Beyond, Barnes & Noble, Copelands Sports, Petco, Ross Dress For Less
Encina Grande Walgreens
Folsom Prairie City Crossing --
Gilroy (3) Barnes & Noble, Bed Bath & Beyond, Beverages & Moore!, Kohl's, Michaels, Petsmart, Pier 1
Imports, Ross Dress For Less, Sportmart
Loehmanns Plaza Long's Drug, Loehmann's
Powell Street Plaza Circuit City, Copelands Sports, Ethan Allen, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Ross Dress For Less
San Leandro --
Sequoia Station Long's Drug, Barnes & Noble, Old Navy, Wherehouse Music
Strawflower Village Long's Drug
Tassajara Crossing Long's Drug, Ace Hardware
The Shops of Santa Barbara Circuit City
West Park Plaza Rite Aid
Woodside Central CEC Entertainment, Marshalls
Subtotal/Weighted Average (CA)
TEXAS
Austin
- ------
Hancock Old Navy, Petco, Sears, 24 Hour Fitness
Market at Round Rock --
North Hills --
Dallas / Ft. Worth
- ------------------
Addison Town Center (5) Babies R Us, New New Buffet, Petsmart
Arapaho Village Arapaho Village Prof. Pharmacy
Bethany Park Place --
Casa Linda Plaza Casa Linda Cafeteria, Colberts, Inc., Dollar Tree, Petco, 24 Hour Fitness
Cooper Street Circuit City, Home Depot, Office Max
Creekside (5) --
Hebron Park (5) --
Hillcrest Village --
Keller Town Center --
Lebanon/Legacy Center (3) --
MacArthur Park Phase II (5) Barnes & Noble, Gap, Linens N' Things
Main Street Center (3) --
Market at Preston Forest Petco
Matlock Center --
Mills Pointe --
Mockingbird Common --
Northview Plaza --
8
Year Gross
Year Con- Leasable Percent
Property Name Acquired structed(1) Area (GLA) Leased (2) Grocery Anchor
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEXAS
Dallas / Ft. Worth
- ------------------
(continued)
Preston Park 1999 1985 273,396 78.2% Tom Thumb
Prestonbrook 1998 1998 91,274 100.0% Kroger
Prestonwood Park 1999 1999 101,024 88.4% Albertson's (4)
Rockwall (3) 2002 2004 65,644 0.0% Tom Thumb (4)
Shiloh Springs 1998 1998 110,040 93.6% Kroger
Signature Plaza (3) 2003 2004 28,795 0.0% Kroger (4)
Southlake (5) 1998 1998 118,092 96.4% Kroger
Southpark 1999 1997 147,088 98.0% Albertson's
Trophy Club 1999 1999 106,607 85.3% Tom Thumb
Valley Ranch Centre 1999 1997 117,187 86.7% Tom Thumb
Houston
- -------
Alden Bridge 2002 1998 138,952 96.5% Kroger
Atascocita Center (3) 2002 2003 94,180 77.5% Kroger
Champions Forest 1999 1983 115,247 88.6% Randall's Food
Cochran's Crossing 2002 1994 138,192 100.0% Kroger
Fort Bend Center 2000 2000 30,164 76.4% Kroger (4)
Indian Springs Center (3), (5) 2002 2003 135,756 63.8% H.E.B.
Kleinwood Center (3) 2002 2003 152,906 72.5% H.E.B.
Panther Creek 2002 1994 165,660 93.4% Randall's Food
Spring West Center (3) 2003 2004 128,796 72.9% H.E.B.
Sterling Ridge 2002 2000 128,643 100.0% Kroger
Sweetwater Plaza (5) 2001 2000 134,045 100.0% Kroger
--------------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average (TX) 5,086,086 88.1%
--------------------
GEORGIA
Atlanta
- -------
Ashford Place 1997 1993 53,450 98.6% --
Briarcliff La Vista 1997 1962 39,203 100.0% --
Briarcliff Village 1997 1990 187,156 98.5% Publix
Buckhead Court 1997 1984 55,235 81.2% --
Cambridge Square Shopping Ctr 1996 1979 71,475 99.0% Kroger
Cromwell Square 1997 1990 70,282 100.0% --
Cumming 400 1997 1994 126,900 95.9% Publix
Delk Spectrum 1998 1991 100,539 100.0% Publix
Dunwoody Hall 1997 1986 89,351 100.0% Publix
Dunwoody Village 1997 1975 120,597 92.0% Fresh Market
Killian Hill Center (5) 2000 2000 113,216 97.5% Publix
Loehmanns Plaza 1997 1986 137,601 95.4% --
Memorial Bend Shopping Center 1997 1995 177,283 95.5% Publix
Orchard Square (5) 1995 1987 93,222 94.9% Publix
Paces Ferry Plaza 1997 1987 61,696 100.0% --
Powers Ferry Village 1997 1994 78,996 99.9% Publix
Powers Ferry Square 1997 1987 97,705 91.6% --
Rivermont Station 1997 1996 90,267 100.0% Kroger
Roswell Village (5) 1997 1997 145,334 83.7% Publix
Russell Ridge 1994 1995 98,558 100.0% Kroger
--------------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average (GA) 2,008,066 95.8%
--------------------
OHIO
Cincinnati
- ----------
Beckett Commons 1998 1995 121,498 100.0% Kroger
Cherry Grove 1998 1997 195,497 89.3% Kroger
Hyde Park 1997 1995 397,893 95.2% Kroger/Thriftway
Regency Milford Center (5) 2001 2001 108,903 88.4% Kroger
Shoppes at Mason 1998 1997 80,800 97.5% Kroger
Westchester Plaza 1998 1988 88,181 100.0% Kroger
Columbus
- --------
East Pointe 1998 1993 86,524 98.4% Kroger
Kingsdale Shopping Center 1997 1999 270,470 58.9% Big Bear
Kroger New Albany Center (5) 1999 1999 91,722 100.0% Kroger
Maxtown Road (Northgate) 1998 1996 85,100 100.0% Kroger
Park Place Shopping Center 1998 1988 106,833 96.3% Big Bear
Windmiller Plaza Phase I 1998 1997 120,362 97.9% Kroger
Worthington Park Centre 1998 1991 93,095 94.2% Kroger
Toledo
- ------
Cherry Street Center 2000 2000 54,660 100.0% Farmer Jack
--------------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average (OH) 1,901,538 90.6%
--------------------
Property Name Drug Store & Other Anchors > 10,000 Square Feet
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEXAS
Dallas / Ft. Worth
- ------------------
(continued)
Preston Park Gap, Williams Sonoma
Prestonbrook --
Prestonwood Park --
Rockwall (3) --
Shiloh Springs --
Signature Plaza (3) --
Southlake (5) --
Southpark Bealls
Trophy Club --
Valley Ranch Centre --
Houston
- -------
Alden Bridge Walgreens
Atascocita Center (3) --
Champions Forest Eckerd
Cochran's Crossing Eckerd
Fort Bend Center --
Indian Springs Center (3), (5) --
Kleinwood Center (3) Walgreens
Panther Creek Eckerd, Sears Paint & Hardware
Spring West Center (3) --
Sterling Ridge Eckerd
Sweetwater Plaza (5) Walgreens
Subtotal/Weighted Average (TX)
GEORGIA
Atlanta
- -------
Ashford Place --
Briarcliff La Vista Michaels
Briarcliff Village La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries, Office Depot, Party City, Petco, TJ Maxx
Buckhead Court --
Cambridge Square Shopping Ctr --
Cromwell Square CVS, Hancock Fabrics, Haverty's, Precision Fitness Equipment
Cumming 400 Big Lots
Delk Spectrum --
Dunwoody Hall Eckerd
Dunwoody Village Walgreens, Dunwoody Prep
Killian Hill Center (5) --
Loehmanns Plaza Walgreens, Dunwoody Prep
Memorial Bend Shopping Center Hollywood Video, TJ Maxx
Orchard Square (5) Harbor Freight Tools, Remax Elite
Paces Ferry Plaza --
Powers Ferry Village CVS, Mardi Gras
Powers Ferry Square CVS, Pearl Arts & Crafts
Rivermont Station CVS
Roswell Village (5) Eckerd
Russell Ridge --
Subtotal/Weighted Average (GA)
OHIO
Cincinnati
- ----------
Beckett Commons Stein Mart
Cherry Grove Hancock Fabrics, Shoe Carnival, TJ Maxx
Hyde Park Walgreens, Barnes & Noble, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Famous Footwear, Michaels
Regency Milford Center (5) --
Shoppes at Mason --
Westchester Plaza --
Columbus
- --------
East Pointe --
Kingsdale Shopping Center --
Kroger New Albany Center (5) --
Maxtown Road (Northgate) --
Park Place Shopping Center --
Windmiller Plaza Phase I Sears Orchard
Worthington Park Centre Dollar Tree
Toledo
- ------
Cherry Street Center --
Subtotal/Weighted Average (OH)
9
Year Gross
Year Con- Leasable Percent
Property Name Acquired structed(1) Area (GLA) Leased (2) Grocery Anchor
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COLORADO
Colorado Springs
- ----------------
Cheyenne Meadows (5) 1998 1998 89,893 100.0% King Soopers
Monument Jackson Creek 1998 1999 85,263 100.0% King Soopers
Woodmen Plaza 1998 1998 104,558 100.0% King Soopers
Denver
- ------
Boulevard Center 1999 1986 88,511 92.0% Safeway (4)
Buckley Square 1999 1978 111,146 100.0% King Soopers
Centerplace of Greeley (3) 2002 2003 246,734 81.7% Safeway
Crossroads Commons (5) 2001 1986 144,288 100.0% Whole Foods
Hilltop Village (3) 2002 2003 100,048 84.9% King Soopers
Leetsdale Marketplace 1999 1993 119,916 100.0% Safeway
Littleton Square 1999 1997 94,257 100.0% King Soopers
Lloyd King Center 1998 1998 83,326 100.0% King Soopers
New Windsor Marketplace (3) 2002 2003 95,877 76.1% King Soopers
Stroh Ranch 1998 1998 93,436 100.0% King Soopers
Willow Creek Center (5) 2001 1985 166,421 97.9% Safeway
--------------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average (CO) 1,623,674 94.2%
--------------------
VIRGINIA
Washington DC
- -------------
Ashburn Farm Market Center 2000 2000 91,905 100.0% Giant
Cheshire Station 2000 2000 97,156 100.0% Safeway
Signal Hill (3) 2003 2004 108,481 66.5% Shoppers Food
Warehouse
Somerset Crossing 2002 2002 104,553 100.0% Shoppers Food
Warehouse
Tall Oaks Village Center 2002 1998 69,331 100.0% Giant
The Market at Opitz Crossing 2003 2003 149,810 99.3% Safeway
Village Center at Dulles (5) 2002 1991 298,601 99.2% Shoppers Food
Warehouse
Other Virginia
- --------------
Brookville Plaza (5) 1998 1991 63,665 98.1% Kroger
Hollymead Town Center (3) 2003 2004 155,207 39.0% Harris Teeter
Statler Square Phase I 1998 1996 133,660 97.9% Kroger
--------------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average (VA) 1,272,369 89.1%
--------------------
NORTH CAROLINA
Charlotte
- ---------
Carmel Commons 1997 1979 132,651 93.2% Fresh Market
Union Square Shopping Center 1996 1989 97,191 100.0% Harris Teeter
Greensboro
- ----------
Kernersville Plaza 1998 1997 72,590 100.0% Harris Teeter
Raleigh / Durham
- ----------------
Bent Tree Plaza (5) 1998 1994 79,503 100.0% Kroger
Garner 1998 1998 221,776 100.0% Kroger
Glenwood Village 1997 1983 42,864 89.7% Harris Teeter
Lake Pine Plaza 1998 1997 87,691 100.0% Kroger
Maynard Crossing 1998 1997 122,832 100.0% Kroger
Southpoint Crossing 1998 1998 103,128 100.0% Kroger
Woodcroft Shopping Center 1996 1984 89,835 100.0% Food Lion
--------------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average (NC) 1,050,061 98.7%
--------------------
WASHINGTON
Seattle
- -------
Cascade Plaza (5) 1999 1999 217,657 99.2% Safeway
Inglewood Plaza 1999 1985 17,253 100.0% --
James Center (5) 1999 1999 140,240 95.5% Fred Myer
Padden Parkway Market Center (3) 2002 2003 88,569 75.9% Albertson's
Pine Lake Village 1999 1989 102,953 100.0% Quality Foods
Sammamish Highland 1999 1992 101,289 97.2% Safeway (4)
South Point Plaza 1999 1997 190,355 97.5% Cost Cutters
Southcenter 1999 1990 58,282 100.0% --
Thomas Lake 1999 1998 103,872 100.0% Albertson's
--------------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average (WA) 1,020,470 96.4%
--------------------
Property Name Drug Store & Other Anchors > 10,000 Square Feet
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COLORADO
Colorado Springs
- ----------------
Cheyenne Meadows (5) --
Monument Jackson Creek --
Woodmen Plaza --
Denver
- ------
Boulevard Center One Hour Optical
Buckley Square True Value Hardware
Centerplace of Greeley (3) Kohl's, Ross Dress For Less, Target (4)
Crossroads Commons (5) Eckerd, Barnes & Noble, Mann Theatres
Hilltop Village (3) --
Leetsdale Marketplace --
Littleton Square Walgreens
Lloyd King Center --
New Windsor Marketplace (3) --
Stroh Ranch --
Willow Creek Center (5) Family Fitness Centers, Gateway, Terri's Consign & Design
Subtotal/Weighted Average (CO)
VIRGINIA
Washington DC
- -------------
Ashburn Farm Market Center --
Cheshire Station Petco
Signal Hill (3) --
Somerset Crossing --
Tall Oaks Village Center --
The Market at Opitz Crossing Boat/Us, USA Discounters
Village Center at Dulles (5) CVS, Advance Auto Parts, Chuck E. Cheese, Gold's Gym, Petco, Staples, The Thrift Store
Other Virginia
- --------------
Brookville Plaza (5) --
Hollymead Town Center (3) Target (4)
Statler Square Phase I Staples
Subtotal/Weighted Average (VA)
NORTH CAROLINA
Charlotte
- ---------
Carmel Commons Eckerd, Chuck E. Cheese, Party City
Union Square Shopping Center CVS, Consolidated Theaters
Greensboro
- ----------
Kernersville Plaza --
Raleigh / Durham
- ----------------
Bent Tree Plaza (5) --
Garner Office Max, Petsmart, Shoe Carnival, Target (4), United Artist Theater
Glenwood Village --
Lake Pine Plaza --
Maynard Crossing --
Southpoint Crossing --
Woodcroft Shopping Center True Value Hardware
Subtotal/Weighted Average (NC)
WASHINGTON
Seattle
- -------
Cascade Plaza (5) Bally Total Fitness, Fashion Bug, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Long's Drug, Ross Dress For Less
Inglewood Plaza --
James Center (5) Rite Aid
Padden Parkway Market Center (3) --
Pine Lake Village Rite Aid
Sammamish Highland Bartell Drugs Store, Ace Hardware
South Point Plaza Rite Aid, Office Depot, Pacific Fabrics, Pep Boys
Southcenter Target (4)
Thomas Lake Rite Aid
Subtotal/Weighted Average (WA)
10
Year Gross
Year Con- Leasable Percent
Property Name Acquired structed(1) Area (GLA) Leased (2) Grocery Anchor
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OREGON
Portland
- --------
Cherry Park Market 1999 1997 113,518 91.7% Safeway
Hillsboro Market Center (5) 2000 2000 150,356 92.5% Albertson's
McMinnville Market Center (3) 2003 2003 74,400 83.5% Albertson's
Murrayhill Marketplace 1999 1988 149,215 86.6% Safeway
Sherwood Crossroads 1999 1999 84,266 95.7% Safeway
Sherwood Market Center 1999 1995 124,257 98.3% Albertson's
Sunnyside 205 1999 1988 53,094 98.1% --
Walker Center 1999 1987 89,609 94.0% --
--------------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average (OR) 838,715 92.2%
--------------------
ARIZONA
Phoenix
- -------
Anthem Marketplace 2003 2000 113,292 100.0% Safeway
Anthem, The Shops 2003 2000 35,710 86.9% --
Palm Valley Marketplace (5) 2001 1999 107,629 96.3% Safeway
Paseo Village 1999 1998 92,399 67.2% --
Pima Crossing 1999 1996 239,438 100.0% --
Stonebridge Center 2000 2000 30,236 75.9% Safeway (4)
The Provinces 2000 2000 34,202 72.8% Safeway (4)
--------------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average (AZ) 652,906 91.5%
--------------------
ALABAMA
Birmingham
- ----------
Southgate Village Shopping Ctr (5) 2001 1988 75,092 100.0% Publix
Trace Crossing (3) 2001 2002 74,130 85.6% Publix
Valleydale Village Shop Center (3) 2002 2003 118,466 66.5% Publix
Village in Trussville 1993 1987 56,356 84.0% Bruno's
Other Markets
- -------------
Phenix Crossing (3) 2003 2004 56,563 77.8% Publix
The Marketplace Alex City 1993 1987 162,723 95.7% Winn-Dixie
--------------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average (AL) 543,330 85.5%
--------------------
TENNESSEE
Nashville
- ---------
Dickson (Hwy 46 & 70) 1998 1998 10,908 100.0% --
Harpeth Village Fieldstone 1997 1998 70,091 100.0% Publix
Nashboro 1998 1998 86,811 95.2% Kroger
Northlake Village I & II 2000 1988 151,629 92.5% Kroger
Peartree Village 1997 1997 114,795 100.0% Harris Teeter
West End Avenue 1998 1998 10,000 100.0% --
--------------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average (TN) 444,234 96.5%
--------------------
ILLINOIS
- --------
Frankfort Crossing Shopping Center 2003 1992 107,734 98.2% Jewel
Hinsdale 1998 1986 178,975 99.0% Dominick's
Westbrook Commons 2001 1984 121,502 92.8% Dominicks
--------------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average (IL) 408,211 97.0%
--------------------
MICHIGAN
- --------
Fenton Marketplace 1999 1999 97,224 98.6% Farmer Jack
Independence Square (3) 2003 2004 88,995 72.5% Kroger
Lakeshore 1998 1996 85,940 85.0% Kroger
Waterford Towne Center 1998 1998 96,101 91.3% Kroger
--------------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average (MI) 368,260 87.2%
--------------------
SOUTH CAROLINA
- --------------
Merchants Village (5) 1997 1997 79,724 100.0% Publix
Murray Landing (3) 2002 2003 64,441 91.3% Publix
Pelham Commons (3) 2002 2003 76,541 90.6% Publix
Queensborough (5) 1998 1993 82,333 100.0% Publix
Rosewood Shopping Center (5) 2001 2001 36,887 95.1% Publix
--------------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average (SC) 339,926 95.7%
--------------------
Property Name Drug Store & Other Anchors > 10,000 Square Feet
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OREGON
Portland
- --------
Cherry Park Market --
Hillsboro Market Center (5) Petsmart, Marshalls
McMinnville Market Center (3) --
Murrayhill Marketplace Segal's Baby News
Sherwood Crossroads --
Sherwood Market Center --
Sunnyside 205 --
Walker Center Sportmart
Subtotal/Weighted Average (OR)
ARIZONA
Phoenix
- -------
Anthem Marketplace --
Anthem, The Shops Ace Hardware
Palm Valley Marketplace (5) --
Paseo Village Walgreens
Pima Crossing Bally Total Fitness, Chez Antiques, E & J Designer Shoe Outlet,
Paddock Pools Store, Pier 1 Imports, Stein Mart
Stonebridge Center --
The Provinces --
Subtotal/Weighted Average (AZ)
ALABAMA
Birmingham
- ----------
Southgate Village Shopping Ctr (5) Dollar General
Trace Crossing (3) --
Valleydale Village Shop Center (3) --
Village in Trussville CVS
Other Markets
- -------------
Phenix Crossing (3) --
The Marketplace Alex City Goody's Family Clothing
Subtotal/Weighted Average (AL)
TENNESSEE
Nashville
- ---------
Dickson (Hwy 46 & 70) Eckerd
Harpeth Village Fieldstone --
Nashboro --
Northlake Village I & II CVS, Outside Nursery Space
Peartree Village Eckerd, Office Max
West End Avenue Walgreens
Subtotal/Weighted Average (TN)
ILLINOIS
- --------
Frankfort Crossing Shopping Center Ace Hardware
Hinsdale Ace Hardware, Murray's Party Time Supplies
Westbrook Commons --
Subtotal/Weighted Average (IL)
MICHIGAN
- --------
Fenton Marketplace Michaels
Independence Square (3) --
Lakeshore Rite Aid
Waterford Towne Center --
Subtotal/Weighted Average (MI)
SOUTH CAROLINA
- --------------
Merchants Village (5) --
Murray Landing (3) --
Pelham Commons (3) --
Queensborough (5) --
Rosewood Shopping Center (5) --
Subtotal/Weighted Average (SC)
11
Year Gross
Year Con- Leasable Percent
Property Name Acquired structed(1) Area (GLA) Leased (2) Grocery Anchor
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KENTUCKY
- --------
Franklin Square (5) 1998 1988 203,317 97.9% Kroger
Shoppes of Ft Wright 2003 2003 20,360 93.1% --
Silverlake (5) 1998 1988 99,352 98.5% Kroger
--------------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average (KY) 323,029 97.8%
--------------------
DELAWARE
- --------
Pike Creek 1998 1981 229,510 99.5% Acme
White Oak - Dover DE 2000 2000 10,908 100.0% --
--------------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average (DE) 240,418 99.5%
--------------------
MARYLAND
- --------
Clinton Park (5) 2003 2003 188,243 90.2% Giant
--------------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average (MD) 188,243 90.2%
--------------------
NEW JERSEY
- ----------
Echelon Village Plaza 2000 2000 88,993 89.4% Genuardi's
--------------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average (NJ) 88,993 89.4%
--------------------
MISSOURI
- --------
St Ann Square 1998 1986 82,498 91.5% National
--------------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average (MO) 82,498 91.5%
--------------------
PENNSYLVANIA
- ------------
Hershey 2000 2000 6,000 100.0% --
--------------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average (PA) 6,000 100.0%
--------------------
Total Weighted Average 30,347,744 92.2%
======================
Property Name Drug Store & Other Anchors > 10,000 Square Feet
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KENTUCKY
- --------
Franklin Square (5) Rite Aid, Chakeres Theatre, JC Penney, Office Depot
Shoppes of Ft Wright --
Silverlake (5) --
Subtotal/Weighted Average (KY)
DELAWARE
- --------
Pike Creek Eckerd, K-Mart
White Oak - Dover DE Eckerd
Subtotal/Weighted Average (DE)
MARYLAND
- --------
Clinton Park (5) K-Mart
Subtotal/Weighted Average (MD)
NEW JERSEY
- ----------
Echelon Village Plaza --
Subtotal/Weighted Average (NJ)
MISSOURI
- --------
St Ann Square Bally Total Fitness
Subtotal/Weighted Average (MO)
PENNSYLVANIA
- ------------
Hershey --
Subtotal/Weighted Average (PA)
Total Weighted Average
(1) Or latest renovation.
(2) Includes development properties. If development properties are
excluded, the total percentage leased would be 95.4% for Company
shopping centers.
(3) Property under development or redevelopment.
(4) Tenant owns its own building.
(5) Owned by a partnership with outside investors in which Regency Centers,
L.P. or an affiliate is the general partner.
12
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are a party to various legal proceedings, which arise, in the
ordinary course of our business. We are not currently involved in any litigation
nor to our knowledge, is any litigation threatened against us, the outcome of
which would, in our judgment based on information currently available to us,
have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of
operations.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted for stockholder vote during the fourth
quarter of 2003.
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Shareholder
Matters
There is no established public trading market for the units of
partnership interest in the Partnership ("Units"), and Units may be transferred
only with the consent of the general partner as provided in the Fourth Amended
and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership (the "Partnership Agreement"). As
of December 31, 2003 there were approximately 47 holders of record in the
aggregate of Original Limited Partnership Units, Additional Units and Series B,
C, D, E and F Preferred Units, determined in accordance with Rule 12g5-1 under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. To the Partnership's knowledge,
there have been no bids for the Units and, accordingly, there is no available
information with respect to the high and low quotation of the Units for any
quarter since Regency became the general partner of the Partnership. Regency
directly or indirectly through a subsidiary holds 98% of the Common Units. Each
outstanding Unit other than the Units held directly or indirectly by Regency and
the Series B, C, D, E and F Preferred Units which are convertible into Regency
preferred stock may be exchangeable by its holder on a one share per one Unit
basis, for the common stock of Regency or for cash, at Regency's election.
The Partnership Agreement provides that the Partnership will make
priority distributions of Available Cash (as defined in the Partnership
Agreement) first to Series C, D, E and F Preferred Units on each March 31, June
30, September 30 and December 31 in a distribution amount equal to 9.0%, 9.125%,
8.75% and 8.75% of the original capital contribution per Series C, D, E and F
Preferred Units, respectively. The Partnership Agreement provides that the
Partnership will make priority distributions of Available Cash (as defined in
the Partnership Agreement) first to Series B Preferred Units on each March 1,
June 1, September 1 and December 1 in a distribution amount equal to 8.75% of
the original capital contribution per Series B Preferred Units. Subject to the
prior right of the holders of Series B, C, D, E and F Preferred Units to receive
all distributions accumulated on such Units in full, at the time of each
distribution to holders of common stock of Regency, distributions of Available
Cash will then be made pro-rata to the holders of common Units, including
Regency.
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE")
under the symbol "REG". We currently have approximately 7,000 shareholders. The
following table sets forth the high and low prices and the cash dividends
declared on our common stock by quarter for 2003 and 2002.
2003 2002
------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
Cash Cash
Quarter High Low Dividends High Low Dividends
Ended Price Price Declared Price Price Declared
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
March 31 $ 33.53 30.40 .52 29.50 26.88 .51
June 30 35.72 32.41 .52 31.03 27.82 .51
September 30 36.95 34.09 .52 31.85 25.22 .51
December 31 40.43 35.56 .52 32.40 28.92 .51
The Partnership intends to pay regular quarterly distributions to its
Unit holders in an amount per Unit identical to the per share amount distributed
to holders of Regency common stock. Regency intends to pay regular quarterly
distributions to our common stockholders. Future distributions will be declared
and paid at the discretion of
13
our Board of Directors, and will depend upon cash generated by operating
activities, our financial condition, capital requirements, annual distribution
requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, and such other factors as our Board of Directors deem relevant. We
anticipate that for the foreseeable future, cash available for distribution will
be greater than earnings and profits due to non-cash expenses, primarily
depreciation and amortization, to be incurred by us. Distributions by us to the
extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits for federal income
tax purposes will be taxable to stockholders as either ordinary dividend income
or capital gain income if so declared by us. Distributions in excess of earnings
and profits generally will be treated as a non-taxable return of capital. Such
distributions have the effect of deferring taxation until the sale of a
stockholder's common stock. In order to maintain
our qualification as a REIT, we must make annual distributions to stockholders
of at least 90% of our taxable income. Under certain circumstances, which we do
not expect to occur, we could be required to make distributions in excess of
cash available for distributions in order to meet such requirements. We
currently maintain the Regency Centers Corporation Dividend Reinvestment and
Stock Purchase Plan which enables our stockholders to automatically reinvest
distributions, as well as, make voluntary cash payments towards the purchase of
additional shares.
Under our loan agreement for our line of credit, distributions may not
exceed 95% of Funds from Operations ("FFO") based on the immediately preceding
four quarters. FFO is defined in accordance with the NAREIT definition available
on their website at www.nareit.com. Also, in the event of any monetary default,
we may not make distributions to stockholders.
There were no sales of unregistered securities during the periods
covered by this report other than a total of 135,985 shares issued during 2003
on a one-for-one basis for exchangeable common units of our operating
partnership, Regency Centers L.P., pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities
Act of 1933.
14
Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data
(in thousands, except per unit data and number of properties)
The following table sets forth Selected Consolidated Financial Data for
the Partnership on a historical basis for the five years ended December 31,
2003. This information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements of the Partnership (including the related notes thereto)
and Management's Discussion and Analysis of the Financial Condition and Results
of Operations, each included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. This historical
Selected Consolidated Financial Data has been derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements.
2003 2002 2001 2000 1999
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Operating Data:
Revenues $ 377,621 353,661 318,800 301,389 258,042
Operating expenses 196,926 176,061 164,272 149,432 123,244
Other expenses (income) 36,550 62,004 40,436 48,795 42,645
Minority interests 501 492 721 2,632 2,855
Income from continuing operations 143,645 115,104 113,371 101,036 89,774
Income from discontinued operations 20,015 31,692 23,325 19,174 15,818
Preferred unit distributions and original
issuance costs 34,001 33,475 33,475 29,601 12,368
Net income for common unit holders 129,658 113,321 103,221 90,103 92,748
Income per common unit - diluted:
Income from continuing operations $ 1.79 1.32 1.30 1.17 1.33
Net income for common unit holders $ 2.12 1.84 1.69 1.49 1.61
Balance Sheet Data:
Real estate investments before accumulated
depreciation $ 3,166,346 3,094,071 3,156,831 2,943,627 2,636,193
Total assets 3,098,229 3,068,928 3,109,314 3,035,144 2,654,936
Total debt 1,452,777 1,333,524 1,396,721 1,307,072 1,011,966
Total liabilities 1,562,530 1,426,349 1,478,811 1,390,796 1,068,806
General partners' capital 1,205,803 1,221,720 1,219,051 1,225,415 1,247,449
Other Information:
Distributions per unit $ 2.08 2.04 2.00 1.92 1.84
Common units outstanding 61,227 61,512 60,645 59,863 60,304
Series A-F Preferred Units outstanding 2,290 4,640 4,640 4,640 3,700
Partnership owned gross leasable area (GLA) 30,348 29,483 29,089 27,991 24,769
Number of properties owned 265 262 272 261 216
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.9
15
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Introduction and Strategic Overview
- -----------------------------------
Regency is a qualified real estate investment trust ("REIT"), which
began operations in 1993. Our primary operating and investment goal is long-term
growth in earnings per share and total shareholder return by focusing on a
strategy of owning and operating grocery anchored shopping centers that are
anchored by market-leading supermarkets, and that are located in areas with
attractive demographics.
Currently, our real estate investments before depreciation total $3.2
billion with 265 shopping centers in 22 states. At December 31, 2003, our gross
leasable area ("GLA") totaled 30.3 million square feet and was 92.2% leased.
Geographically, 19.6% of our GLA is located in Florida, 19.5% in California,
16.8% in Texas, 6.6% in Georgia, 6.3% in Ohio, and 31.2% spread throughout 17
other states. We own and operate our shopping centers through our operating
partnership, Regency Centers, L.P. ("RCLP"), in which we currently own 98% of
the operating partnership units. Regency's operating, investing and financing
activities are generally performed by RCLP.
We earn revenues and generate operating cash flow by leasing space to
grocers and retail side-shop tenants in our shopping centers. We experience
growth in revenues by increasing occupancy and rental rates at currently owned
shopping centers, and by developing new shopping centers. A neighborhood center
is a convenient, cost-effective distribution platform for food retailers.
Grocery anchored centers generate substantial daily traffic and offer
sustainable competitive advantages to their tenants. This high traffic generates
increased sales, thereby driving higher occupancy, rental rates and rental-rate
growth for Regency, which we expect to sustain our growth in earnings per share
and increase the value of our portfolio over the long term.
We seek a range of strong national, regional and local specialty
tenants, for the same reason that we choose to anchor our centers with leading
grocers. We have created a formal partnering process -- the Premier Customer
Initiative ("PCI") -- to promote mutually beneficial relationships with our
non-grocer specialty retailers. The objective of PCI is for Regency to build a
base of specialty tenants who represent the "best-in-class" operators in their
respective merchandising categories. Such tenants reinforce the consumer appeal
and other strengths of a center's grocery anchor, help to stabilize a center's
occupancy, reduce re-leasing downtime, reduce tenant turnover and yield higher
sustainable rents.
We primarily grow our shopping center portfolio through new shopping
center development, where we acquire the land and construct the building.
Development is customer-driven, meaning we generally have an executed lease from
the anchor before we start construction. Developments serve the growth needs of
our grocery and specialty retail customers, result in modern shopping centers
with long-term leases from the grocery anchors and produce attractive returns on
our invested capital. This development process can require up to 36 months from
initial land or redevelopment acquisition through construction, lease-up and
stabilization of rental income, depending upon the size of the project.
Generally, anchor tenants begin operating their stores prior to construction
completion of the entire center, resulting in rental income during the
development phase.
We intend to maintain a conservative capital structure to fund our
growth programs without compromising our investment-grade ratings. Our approach
is founded on our self-funding business model. This model utilizes center
"recycling" as a key component. Our recycling strategy calls for us to re-deploy
the proceeds from the sales of properties into new higher quality developments
that we expect to generate sustainable revenue growth and more attractive
returns on invested capital. Our commitment to maintaining a high-quality
shopping center portfolio dictates that we continually assess the value of all
of our properties and sell those that no longer meet our long-term investment
standards.
Joint venturing of shopping centers also provides us with a capital
source for new development, as well as the opportunity to earn fees for asset
and property management services. As asset manager, we are engaged by our
partners to apply similar operating, investment, and capital strategies to the
portfolios owned by the joint ventures. Joint ventures grow their shopping
center investments through acquisitions from third parties or direct purchases
of shopping centers from Regency. Although selling properties to joint ventures
reduces our ownership interest, we continue to share in the risks and rewards of
centers that meet our long-term investment strategy. Regency is not subject to
liability and has no obligations or guarantees of the joint ventures beyond its
ownership percentage.
16
We have identified certain significant risks and challenges affecting
our industry, and we are addressing them accordingly. A further economic
downturn could result in declines in occupancy levels at our shopping centers,
which would reduce our rental revenues; however, we believe that our investment
focus on grocery anchored shopping centers that provide daily necessities will
minimize the impact of a downturn in the economy. Increased competition from
super-centers such as Wal-Mart could result in grocery anchor closings or
consolidations in the grocery store industry. We currently have 37 shopping
centers, less than 15% of our portfolio, that operate within three miles of a
super-center and we closely monitor their performance and tenants' sales. A slow
down in our shopping center development program would reduce operating revenues
and gains from sales. We believe that developing shopping centers in markets
with strong demographics with leading grocery stores will enable us to continue
to maintain our development program at historical averages.
Shopping Center Portfolio
- -------------------------
The following table summarizes general operating statistics related to
our shopping center portfolio, including properties partially owned in joint
ventures that we use to evaluate and monitor our performance:
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
Number of Properties 265 262 272
Properties in Development 36 34 41
Gross Leaseable Area (GLA) 30,347,744 29,482,626 29,089,493
Percent Leased - All Properties 92.2% 91.5% 92.7%
Percent Leased - Non development 95.4% 94.8% 94.9%
Same Property Growth Rate 2.7% 3.0% 3.2%
Lease Renewal Rate 75% 77% 71%
Base Rent Growth on Re-Leasing 9.5% 10.8% 10.5%
A list of our shopping centers summarized by state and in order of
largest holdings follows, including those properties that we partially own in
joint ventures:
December 31, 2003 December 31, 2002
----------------- -----------------
Location # Properties GLA % Leased # Properties GLA % Leased
-------- ------------ --- -------- ------------ --- --------
Florida 50 5,943,345 94.3% 53 6,193,550 90.9%
California 49 5,917,372 90.8% 43 5,125,030 91.4%
Texas 41 5,086,086 88.1% 40 5,123,197 88.1%
Georgia 20 2,008,066 95.8% 24 2,437,712 93.2%
Ohio 14 1,901,538 90.6% 14 1,901,684 91.4%
Colorado 14 1,623,674 94.2% 15 1,538,570 88.5%
Virginia 10 1,272,369 89.1% 7 872,796 92.4%
North Carolina 10 1,050,061 98.7% 12 1,225,201 97.6%
Washington 9 1,020,470 96.4% 9 986,374 98.8%
Oregon 8 838,715 92.2% 9 822,115 93.7%
Arizona 7 652,906 91.5% 6 525,701 95.9%
Alabama 6 543,330 85.5% 7 644,896 90.4%
Tennessee 6 444,234 96.5% 6 444,234 95.3%
Illinois 3 408,211 97.0% 2 300,477 96.1%
Michigan 4 368,260 87.2% 3 279,265 92.6%
South Carolina 5 339,926 95.7% 5 339,256 85.6%
Kentucky 3 323,029 97.8% 2 304,659 96.6%
Delaware 2 240,418 99.5% 2 240,418 99.0%
Maryland 1 188,243 90.2% - - -
New Jersey 1 88,993 89.4% 1 88,993 79.7%
Missouri 1 82,498 91.5% 1 82,498 92.9%
Pennsylvania 1 6,000 100.0% 1 6,000 100.0%
----------------- --------------- ---------------- ---------------- --------------- ---------------
Total 265 30,347,744 92.2% 262 29,482,626 91.5%
================= =============== ================ ================ =============== ===============
17
The following summarizes the four largest grocery tenants occupying
our shopping centers, including those partially owned through joint ventures at
December 31, 2003:
Percentage of Percentage of
Grocery Number of Company- Annualized
Anchor Stores (a) owned GLA (b) Base Rent (b)
------ ---------- ------------- -------------
Kroger 61 11.7% 8.2%
Publix 53 8.1% 5.1%
Safeway 47 6.1% 4.8%
Albertsons 24 3.0% 2.4%
(a) Includes stores owned by the grocery anchor that are attached to
our centers.
(b) GLA includes 100% of the GLA in unconsolidated joint ventures.
Annualized base rent includes only Regency's pro-rata share of
rent from unconsolidated joint ventures.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
- -------------------------------
General
- -------
We expect that cash generated from revenues will provide the necessary
funds on a short-term basis to pay our operating expenses, interest expense,
scheduled principal payments on outstanding indebtedness, recurring capital
expenditures necessary to maintain our shopping centers properly, and
distributions to stock and unit holders. Net cash provided by operating
activities was $227.9 million, $188.7 million and $185.9 million for the years
ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. During 2003, 2002, and
2001, we incurred capital expenditures of $13.5 million, $15.0 million and $11.8
million to maintain our shopping centers, paid scheduled principal payments of
$13.5 million, $5.6 million and $6.1 million to our lenders, and paid dividends
and distributions of $157.9 million, $158.5 million and $154.4 million to our
share and unit holders, respectively.
Although base rent is supported by long-term lease contracts, tenants
who file bankruptcy are able to cancel their leases and close the related
stores. In the event that a tenant with a significant number of leases in our
shopping centers files bankruptcy and cancels its leases, we could experience a
significant reduction in our revenues. We are not currently aware of any current
or pending bankruptcy of any of our tenants that would cause a significant
reduction in our revenues, and no tenant represents more than 10% of our annual
base rental revenues.
We expect to meet long-term capital requirements for maturing preferred
units and debt, the acquisition of real estate, and the renovation or
development of shopping centers from: (i) residual cash generated from operating
activities after the payments described above, (ii) proceeds from the sale of
real estate, (iii) joint venturing of real estate, (iv) refinancing of debt, and
(v) equity raised in the private or public markets. Additionally, the Company
has the right to call and repay, at par, outstanding preferred units five years
after their issuance date, at the Company's discretion.
We intend to continue to grow our portfolio through new development and
acquisitions, either directly or through our joint venture relationships.
Because development and acquisition activities are discretionary in nature, they
are not expected to burden the capital resources we have currently available for
liquidity requirements. Capital necessary to complete developments-in-process
are funded from our line of credit. Regency expects that cash provided by
operating activities, unused amounts available under our line of credit and cash
reserves are adequate to meet short-term and committed long-term liquidity
requirements.
Shopping Center Development, Acquisitions and Sales
- ---------------------------------------------------
At December 31, 2003, we had 36 projects under construction or
undergoing major renovations, which, when completed, we expect to represent an
investment of $693.9 million before the estimated reimbursement of certain
tenant-related costs and projected sales proceeds from adjacent land and
out-parcels of $122.7 million. Costs necessary to complete these developments
will be $273.1 million, are generally already committed as part of existing
construction contracts, and will be expended through 2006. These developments
are approximately 61% complete and 76% pre-leased. The costs necessary to
18
complete these developments will be funded from our line of credit which has a
commitment amount of $600 million and a balance of $195.0 million at December
31, 2003. During 2003, we started $300.3 million of new development based on
total costs that we expect to expend on these 18 centers through completion.
During 2002, we started $335.5 million of new development representing 21
centers.
During 2003, we acquired four operating properties from third parties
for $75.4 million, representing 2.4% of our consolidated assets at December 31,
2003. These properties were acquired in existing investment markets, are grocery
anchored, and are owned entirely by Regency. Comparatively, we acquired five
operating properties during 2002 for $106.7 million, or 3.5% of consolidated
assets at December 31, 2002. These acquisitions did not have a significant
impact on operations during 2003 and 2002.
During 2003, we sold 18 retail centers to third parties for $170.7
million, compared with 41 retail centers sold for $339.1 million during 2002 as
part of our asset recycling program. Of the centers sold in 2003, 14 were
operating during 2003 and are included in discontinued operations in our
accompanying consolidated statements of operations. All 41 centers sold during
2002 were operating and are included in discontinued operations. We also sold
partial interests in 12 properties both in 2003 and 2002 to joint ventures for
$232.9 million and $164.8 million, respectively, discussed further below under
Investments in Real Estate Partnerships. We have an inventory of land
out-parcels adjacent to our shopping centers that we routinely develop, lease,
or sell. During 2003, sales related to out-parcels were $55.7 million compared
to $31.8 million in 2002. Total gains from sales of real estate included in
continuing operations and discontinued operations were $65.1 million in 2003,
compared with $37.4 million in 2002.
Investments in new developments and acquisitions, and proceeds from the
sale of properties to third parties or partial sales to joint ventures are
included in investing activities in the accompanying consolidated statements of
cash flows. Net cash used in investing activities was $96.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003. This compares with net cash provided by investing
activities of $95.0 million in 2002 and net cash used in investing activities of
$164.1 million in 2001.
Investments in Real Estate Partnerships
- ---------------------------------------
At December 31, 2003, we had investments in real estate partnerships of
$140.5 million, primarily comprised of two partnerships, a 20% investment
interest in Columbia Regency Retail Partners, LLC ("Columbia"), a joint
venture with the Oregon State Treasury, and a 25% investment interest in
Macquarie CountryWide-Regency, LLC ("MCWR"), a joint venture with an affiliate
of Macquarie CountryWide Trust of Australia, a Sydney, Australia-based
property trust. The purpose of these partnerships is to invest in retail
shopping centers, and we have been engaged by our partners to provide asset
and property management services.
The following is a summary of unconsolidated combined assets and
liabilities of these partnerships, and our pro-rata share at December 31,
2003, 2002 and 2001 ($ amounts in thousands):
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
Number of Joint Ventures 8 7 7
Regency's Ownership 20%-50% 20%-50% 20%-50%
Number of Properties 46 34 20
Combined Assets $ 812,190 $ 568,839 $ 294,677
Combined Liabilities 336,340 177,457 73,472
Combined Equity 475,850 391,382 221,205
Combined Net Income 39,602 20,766 10,865
Regency's Share of:
Assets $ 239,801 $ 182,377 $ 100,217
Liabilities 99,305 56,895 24,987
Equity 140,496 125,482 75,230
Net Income 11,276 5,765 3,439
At December 31, 2003, Columbia owned 13 shopping centers and had total
assets of $295.0 million. Columbia acquired two shopping centers for $39.1
million from third parties during 2003 and sold one shopping center to a third
party for $46.2 million. During 2002, Columbia acquired one shopping center from
us for $19.5 million, for which we received cash of $15.6 million.
19
At December 31, 2003, MCWR owned 26 shopping centers and had total
assets of $412.4 million. During 2003, MCWR acquired 12 shopping centers from
Regency for $232.9 million, for which we received cash of $79.4 million, and
notes receivable of $95.3 million with a rate of LIBOR plus 1.5%, net of our 25%
equity contribution of $58.2 million. During 2003, MCWR repaid $69.3 million of
the notes and in February 2004, MCWR repaid an additional $10.5 million. MCWR is
currently in the process of placing third party, fixed-rate mortgages on certain
properties, the proceeds of which will be used to repay the remaining balance of
$15.5 million. We recognized gains on these sales of $25.7 million recorded as
gain from sale of operating or development properties. During 2002, MCWR
acquired 11 shopping centers from the Company for $145.2 million, for which we
received net proceeds of $83.8 million and a note receivable of $25.1 million,
net of our 25% equity contribution of $36.3 million. MCWR repaid the note
receivable during 2003. The Company recognized gains on these sales of $11.1
million. During 2003, MCWR sold two shopping centers to third parties for $20.1
million.
Recognition of gain from sales to joint ventures is recorded on only
that portion of the sales not attributable to our ownership interest. The gains
and operations are not recorded as discontinued operations because of our
continuing involvement in these shopping centers. Columbia and MCWR intend to
continue to acquire retail shopping centers, some of which they may acquire
directly from us. For those properties acquired from third parties, we are
required to contribute our pro-rata share of the purchase price to the
partnership.
Debt and Equity
- ---------------
Outstanding debt at December 31, 2003 and 2002 consists of the
following (in thousands):
2003 2002
---- ----
Notes Payable:
Fixed-rate mortgage loans $ 217,001 229,551
Variable-rate mortgage loans 41,629 24,998
Fixed-rate unsecured loans 999,147 998,975
-------------- ---------------
Total notes payable 1,257,777 1,253,524
Unsecured line of credit 195,000 80,000
-------------- ---------------
Total $ 1,452,777 1,333,524
============== ===============
Mortgage loans are secured and may be prepaid, but could be subject to
yield maintenance premiums. Mortgage loans are generally due in monthly
installments of interest and principal, and mature over various terms through
2023. Variable interest rates on mortgage loans are currently based on LIBOR,
plus a spread in a range of 125 to 150 basis points. Fixed interest rates on
mortgage loans range from 5.65% to 9.5%.
We have an unsecured line of credit (the "Line") with a commitment from
our banks of $600 million and a current balance of $195 million. Interest rates
paid on the Line, which are based on LIBOR plus .85%, were 1.975% and 2.288%, on
December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The spread that we pay on the Line is
dependent upon maintaining specific investment-grade ratings. We are also
required to comply, and are in compliance, with certain financial and other
covenants customary with this type of unsecured financing. The Line is used
primarily to finance the development of real estate, but is also available for
general working capital purposes. The Line matures on April 30, 2004, but
contains a one-year extension option. We have executed a commitment with the
lead bank under the Line and expect to renew it for a term of three years from
the original maturity date.
As of December 31, 2003, scheduled principal repayments on notes
payable and the Line were as follows (in thousands):
Scheduled
Principal Term-Loan Total
Scheduled Payments by Year Payments Maturities Payments
-------------------------- -------------- --------------- ---------------
2004 (includes the Line balance) $ 5,344 419,340 424,684
2005 3,954 172,915 176,869
2006 3,476 20,783 24,259
2007 2,891 25,690 28,581
2008 2,697 19,618 22,315
Beyond five years 21,119 749,561 770,680
Unamortized debt premiums - 5,389 5,389
------------ --------------- ---------------
Total $ 39,481 1,413,296 1,452,777
============ =============== ===============
20
Our investments in real estate partnerships had unconsolidated notes
and mortgage loans payable of $322.2 million at December 31, 2003, and the
Company's proportionate share of these loans was $74.4 million. We do not
guarantee any debt of these partnerships beyond our ownership percentage.
We are exposed to capital market risk such as changes in interest
rates. In order to manage the volatility related to interest-rate risk, we
originate new debt with fixed interest rates, or we consider entering into
interest-rate hedging arrangements. At December 31, 2003, 84% of our total debt
had fixed interest rates, compared with 92% in 2002. We intend to limit the
percentage of variable interest- rate debt to be no more than 30% of total debt,
which we believe to be an acceptable risk. Based upon the variable interest-rate
debt outstanding at December 31, 2003, if variable interest rates were to
increase by 1%, our annual interest expense would increase by $2.4 million. We
do not utilize derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative
purposes. We account for derivative instruments under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities" as amended ("Statement 133").
We have $200 million of 7.4% unsecured debt maturing April 1, 2004. We
currently expect to refinance at least $150 million with comparable securities
at the maturity date with terms up to 10 years, but at a lower fixed interest
rate, and repay any remaining amounts from the Line. In July and September 2003,
we entered into two forward-starting interest-rate swaps of $96.5 million and
$47.7 million, respectively. We designated the aggregate $144.2 million swaps as
a hedge to fix the rate on our financing, which we expect to complete on April
1, 2004. The fair value of the swaps was an asset of $174,747 as of December 31,
2003, and is recorded in other assets in our accompanying consolidated balance
sheet. The swaps qualify for hedge accounting under Statement 133; therefore, we
record changes in fair value through other comprehensive income. No hedge
ineffectiveness has been incurred or recognized to date on these swaps. Amounts
that we have reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to these
swaps will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on
the related debt.
On August 18, 2003, we issued 3,600,000 shares of common stock at
$35.96 per share in a public offering. The proceeds of $129.5 million net of
offering costs were used to redeem $80 million, or 100%, of the Series A
Preferred Units and to reduce the outstanding balance of the Line. At the time
of the redemption, $1.2 million of previously deferred costs related to the
original preferred units' issuance were expensed in the consolidated statement
of operations as a component of minority interest preferred units.
On June 24, 2003, we purchased 4,606,880 shares of common stock for
$150 million from Security Capital pursuant to a Purchase and Sale Agreement
dated June 11, 2003. The purchase was funded from the Line.
On April 3, 2003, we received proceeds from a $75 million offering of
3,000,000 depositary shares representing Series 3 Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock. The depositary shares are not convertible into common stock of
the Company and are redeemable at par upon Regency's election on or after April
3, 2008, pay a 7.45% annual dividend and have a liquidation value of $25 per
depositary share.
In March 2003, we redeemed $35 million of Series C 9% Preferred Units
and $40 million of Series E 8.75% Preferred Units in a negotiated transaction.
The redemptions were portions of each series, and we paid a 1% premium on the
face value of the redeemed units totaling $750,000. At the time of redemption,
the premium and $1.9 million of previously deferred costs related to the
original preferred units' issuance were expensed in the consolidated statement
of operations as a component of minority interest of preferred units. The
redemption was funded from proceeds from the Line.
We have issued Preferred Units in various amounts since 1998, the net
proceeds of which we used to reduce the balance of the Line. We sold the issues
primarily to institutional investors in private placements. The Preferred Units,
which may be called by us after certain dates ranging from 2004 to 2005, have no
stated maturity or mandatory redemption, and they pay a cumulative, quarterly
dividend at fixed rates ranging from 8.75% to 9.125%. At any time after 10 years
from the date of issuance, the Preferred Units may be exchanged by the holders
for Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock at an exchange rate of one share for
one unit. The Preferred Units and the related Preferred Stock are not
21
convertible into Regency common stock. At December 31, 2003 and 2002 the face
value of total Preferred Units issued was $229 million and $384 million,
respectively, with an average fixed distribution rate of 8.88% and 8.72%,
respectively. Included in Preferred Units are original issuance costs of $5.5
million that will be expensed as the underlying Preferred Units are redeemed in
the future.
In summary, net cash used in financing activities related to the debt
and equity activity discussed above was $158.2 million, $255.0 million and $94.9
million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
- ------------------------------------------
Knowledge about our accounting policies is necessary for a complete
understanding of our financial results, and discussions and analysis of these
results. The preparation of our financial statements requires that we make
certain estimates that impact the balance of assets and liabilities at a
financial statement date and the reported amount of income and expenses during a
financial reporting period. These accounting estimates are based upon our
judgments and are considered to be critical because of their significance to the
financial statements and the possibility that future events may differ from
those judgments, or that the use of different assumptions could result in
materially different estimates. We review these estimates on a periodic basis to
ensure reasonableness. However, the amounts we may ultimately realize could
differ from such estimates.
Capitalization of Costs - We have an investment services group with an
established infrastructure that supports the due diligence, land acquisition,
construction, leasing and accounting of our development properties. All direct
costs related to these activities are capitalized. Included in these costs are
interest and real estate taxes incurred during construction, as well as
estimates for the portion of internal costs that are incremental and deemed
directly or indirectly related to our development activity. If future accounting
standards limit the amount of internal costs that may be capitalized, or if our
development activity were to decline significantly without a proportionate
decrease in internal costs, we could incur a significant increase in our
operating expenses.
Valuation of Real Estate Investments - Our long-lived assets, primarily
real estate held for investment, are carried at cost unless circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. We review
long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate such an evaluation is warranted. The review involves a number of
assumptions and estimates used to determine whether impairment exists. Depending
on the asset, we use varying methods such as i) estimating future cash flows,
ii) determining resale values by market, or iii) applying a capitalization rate
to net operating income using prevailing rates in a given market. These methods
of determining fair value can fluctuate significantly as a result of a number of
factors, including changes in the general economy of those markets in which we
operate, tenant credit quality and demand for new retail stores. If we determine
that impairment exists due to our inability to recover an asset's carrying
value, a provision for loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value
exceeds estimated fair value.
Discontinued Operations - The application of current accounting
principles that govern the classification of any of our properties as held for
sale on the balance sheet, or the presentation of results of operations and
gains on the sale of these properties as discontinued, requires management to
make certain significant judgments. In evaluating whether a property meets the
criteria set forth by Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Statement
No. 144 "Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets"
("Statement 144"), the Company makes a determination as to the point in time
that it can be reasonably certain that a sale will be consummated. Given the
nature of all real estate sales contracts, it is not unusual for such contracts
to allow potential buyers a period of time to evaluate the property prior to
formal acceptance of the contract. In addition, certain other matters critical
to the final sale, such as financing arrangements, often remain pending even
upon contract acceptance. As a result, properties under contract may not close
within the expected time period, if at all. Due to these uncertainties, it is
not likely that the Company can meet the criteria of Statement 144 prior to the
sale formally closing. Therefore, any properties categorized as held for sale
represent only those properties that management has determined are probable to
close within the requirements set forth in Statement 144. The Company also makes
judgments regarding the extent of involvement it will have with a property
subsequent to its sale, in order to determine if the results of operations and
gain/loss on sale should be reflected as discontinued. Consistent with Statement
144, any property sold to an entity in which the Company has significant
continuing involvement (most often joint ventures) are not considered to be
discontinued. In addition, any property which the Company sells to an unrelated
third party, but retains a property or asset management function, is also not
considered discontinued. Thus, only properties sold, or to be sold, to unrelated
third parties for which the Company, in its judgment, has no continuing
involvement are classified as discontinued.
22
Income Tax Status - The prevailing assumption underlying the operation
of our business is that we will continue to operate so as to qualify as a REIT,
defined under the Internal Revenue Code. We are required to meet certain income
and asset tests on a periodic basis to ensure that we continue to qualify as a
REIT. As a REIT, we are allowed to reduce taxable income by all or a portion of
our distributions to stockholders. We evaluate the transactions that we enter
into and determine their impact on our REIT status. Determining our taxable
income, calculating distributions, and evaluating transactions requires us to
make certain judgments and estimates as to the positions we take in our
interpretation of the Internal Revenue Code. Because many types of transactions
are susceptible to varying interpretations under federal and state income tax
laws and regulations, our positions are subject to change at a later date upon
final determination by the taxing authorities.
New Accounting Pronouncements
- -----------------------------
In December 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN 46")
(revised December 2003 ("FIN 46R")), "Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities", which addresses how a business enterprise should evaluate whether it
has controlling financial interest in an entity through means other than voting
rights and accordingly should consolidate the entity. FIN 46R replaces FIN 46,
which was issued in January 2003. FIN 46R is applicable immediately to a
variable interest entity created after January 31, 2003 and as of the first
interim period ending after March 15, 2004 to those variable interest entities
created before February 1, 2003 and not already consolidated under FIN 46 in
previously issued financial statements. We did not create any variable interest
entities after January 31, 2003. We have analyzed the applicability of this
interpretation to our structures created before February 1, 2003 and we do not
believe its adoption will have a material effect on our results of operations.
In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Accounting Standards No. 150,
"Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both
Liabilities and Equity" ("Statement 150"). Statement 150 affects the accounting
for certain financial instruments, including requiring companies having
consolidated entities with specified termination dates to treat minority
owners' interests in such entities as liabilities in an amount based on the
fair value of the entities. Although Statement 150 was originally effective
July 1, 2003, the FASB has indefinitely deferred certain provisions related to
classification and measurement requirements for mandatorily redeemable
financial instruments that become subject to Statement 150 solely as a result
of consolidation including minority interests of entities with specified
termination dates. As a result, Statement 150 has no impact on the Company's
consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2003.
At December 31, 2003, we held a majority interest in five consolidated
entities with specified termination dates ranging from 2012 to 2049. The
minority owners' interests in these entities are to be settled upon termination
by distribution of either cash or specific assets of the underlying entities.
The estimated fair value of minority interests in these entities was $8.5
million as compared to the carrying value of $4.7 million. We have no other
financial instruments that currently are affected by Statement 150.
Results from Operations
- -----------------------
Comparison of 2003 to 2002
- --------------------------
At December 31, 2003, we were operating or developing 265 shopping
centers. We identify our shopping centers as either development properties or
stabilized properties. Development properties are defined as properties that are
in the construction and initial lease-up process and are not yet fully leased
(fully leased generally means greater than 93% leased) or occupied. Stabilized
properties are those properties that are generally greater than 93% leased and,
if they were developed, are more than three years beyond their original
development start date. At December 31, 2003, we had 229 stabilized shopping
centers that were 95.4% leased.
Our revenues increased by $24.0 million, or 7%, to $377.6 million in
2003. This increase was related to changes in occupancy from 91.5% to 92.2% for
the combined portfolio of stabilized and development properties, growth in
re-leasing rental rates, and revenues from new developments commencing
operations in 2003, net of a reduction in revenues from properties sold. In
2003, our rental rates grew by 9.5% from renewal leases and new leases replacing
previously occupied spaces in the stabilized properties. In addition to
collecting minimum rent from our tenants for the GLA that they lease from us, we
also collect contingent rent based upon tenant sales, which we refer to as
percentage rent. Tenants are also responsible for reimbursing us for their
pro-rata share of the expenses associated with operating our shopping centers.
In 2003, our minimum rent increased by $12.7 million, or 5%, and our recoveries
23
from tenants increased $4.6 million, or 6%. Percentage rent was $4.5 million in
2003 compared with $5.2 million in 2002, the reduction primarily related to
renewing anchor tenant leases with minimum rent increases which had a
corresponding reduction to percentage rent.
Our operating expenses increased by $20.9 million, or 12%, to $196.9
million in 2003. Our combined operating, maintenance, and real estate taxes
increased by $5.7 million, or 7%, during 2003 to $93.0 million. This increase
was primarily due to new developments that incurred operating expenses for only
a portion of the previous year and general increases in operating expenses on
the stabilized properties. Our general and administrative expenses were $24.2
million during 2003, compared with $22.8 million in 2002, or 6% higher, a result
of general salary and benefit increases. Our depreciation and amortization
expense increased $6.9 million during the current year related to new
development properties placed in service during 2003.
Our net interest expense decreased to $84.0 million in 2003 from $84.2
million in 2002. Average interest rates on our outstanding debt declined to
6.64% at December 31, 2003 compared with 6.93% at December 31, 2002, primarily
due to reductions in the LIBOR rate. Our average fixed interest rates were 7.54%
at December 31, 2003, compared with 7.51% at December 31, 2002. Our weighted
average outstanding debt during 2003 was $1.436 billion compared with $1.392
billion in 2002.
We account for profit recognition on sales of real estate in accordance
with FASB Statement No. 66, "Accounting for Sales of Real Estate." Profits from
sales of real estate will not be recognized by us unless a sale has been
consummated; the buyer's initial and continuing investment is adequate to
demonstrate a commitment to pay for the property; we have transferred to the
buyer the usual risks and rewards of ownership; and we do not have substantial
continuing involvement with the property. Gains from the sale of operating and
development properties were $48.7 million in 2003 related to the sale of 16
properties for $299.9 million. During 2002, we recorded gains of $20.9 million
related to the sale of 12 properties for $164.8 million. These gains are
included in continuing operations rather than discontinued operations because
they were either development properties that had no operating income, or they
were sold to joint ventures where we have a continuing minority investment.
We review our real estate portfolio for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that we may not be able to recover the
carrying amount of an asset. We determine whether impairment has occurred by
comparing the property's carrying value to an estimate of fair value based upon
methods described in our Critical Accounting Policies. In the event a property
is impaired, we write down the asset to fair value for "held-and-used" assets
and to fair value less costs to sell for "held-for-sale" assets. During the
years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, we recorded provisions for losses of
approximately $2.0 million and $4.4 million, respectively, of which $719,345 and
$3.3 million, respectively, were reclassed to operating income from discontinued
operations after the related properties were sold.
Our income from discontinued operations was $20.0 million in 2003
related to 14 centers sold to third parties for $103.7 million, which produced
gains on sale of $16.4 million. In compliance with the adoption of SFAS No. 144,
"Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" ("Statement
144") in January 2002, if we sell an asset in the current year, we are required
to reclassify its operating income into discontinued operations for all prior
periods. This practice results in a reclassification of amounts previously
reported as continuing operations into discontinued operations. Reclassified
operating income from discontinued operations was $15.2 million in 2002,
compared with $10.2 million previously reported for 2002, a result of
reclassifying the historical operations of the properties sold in 2003. During
2002, we sold 41 properties for $339.1 million to third parties, which resulted
in a gain of $16.5 million.
Net income for common unit holders was $129.7 million in 2003, compared
with $113.3 million in 2002, or a 14% increase for the reasons previously
discussed. Diluted earnings per unit were $2.12 in 2003, compared with $1.84 in
2002, or 15% higher, related to the increase in net income offset by an increase
in weighted average common units of 803,719 units.
Comparison of 2002 to 2001
At December 31, 2002, we were operating or developing 262 shopping
centers, and we had 228 stabilized shopping centers that were 94.8% leased. Our
revenues increased $34.9 million, or 11%, to $353.7 million in 2002. This
increase was due primarily to growth in re-leasing rental rates and revenue from
new developments commencing operations in 2002, net of a reduction in revenues
from properties sold. In 2002, our rental rates grew by 10.8%. Our minimum rent
increased by $23.5 million, or 10%, and our recoveries from tenants increased by
24
$8.3 million, or 12%. Our percentage rent was $5.2 million in 2002 compared with
$5.6 million in 2001 the reduction primarily related to renewing anchor tenant
leases with minimum rent increases which had a corresponding reduction to
percentage rent, and in certain cases reduced tenant sales.
Our operating expenses increased by $11.8 million, or 7%, to $176.1
million in 2002. Our combined operating, maintenance, and real estate taxes
increased by $8.4 million, or 11%, during 2002 to $87.3 million. The increase
was primarily due to new developments that incurred expenses for only a portion
of the previous year and general increases in operating expenses on our
stabilized properties. Our general and administrative expenses were $22.8
million during 2002, compared with $19.8 million in 2001, or 15% higher, as a
result of opening several branch offices in new markets and general salary and
benefit increases. Our depreciation and amortization expense increased by $7.4
million during 2002 related to new development properties placed in service
during 2002 and initial depreciation of operating properties previously
classified as "held for sale" that no longer meet the criteria under Statement
144.
Gains from the sale of our operating and development properties were
$20.9 million in 2002 related to the sale of 12 properties for $164.8 million.
During 2001, we recorded gains of $28.8 million related to the sale of 13
properties for $123.0 million. These gains are included in continuing operations
rather than discontinued operations because they were either development
properties that had no operating income, or they were sold to joint ventures
where we have a continuing minority investment.
Our net interest expense increased to $84.2 million in 2002 from $67.6
million in 2001, or 25%. This increase was primarily due to higher average
outstanding debt balances and lower interest capitalization on new developments.
Average interest rates on our outstanding debt declined to 6.93% at December 31,
2002, from 7.27% at December 31, 2001.
Our income from discontinued operations was $31.7 million in 2002
compared with $23.3 million in 2001. Income from discontinued operations
includes gains from the sale of properties of $16.5 million in 2002 as
previously discussed. Statement 144 was implemented during 2002, and therefore,
no gains or losses from the sales of assets in 2001 were reported under
discontinued operations in 2001.
Net income for common unit holders was $113.3 million in 2002, compared
with $103.2 million in 2001, or a 10% increase for the reasons previously
discussed. Diluted earnings per unit were $1.84 in 2002, compared with $1.69 in
2001, or 9% higher, as a result of the increase in net income offset by an
increase in weighted average common units of 1,159,955 units.
Environmental Matters
- ---------------------
We are subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations and we
are primarily concerned with dry cleaning plants that currently operate or have
operated at our shopping centers in the past. We believe that the tenants who
currently operate plants do so in accordance with current laws and regulations.
Generally, we use all legal means to cause tenants to remove dry cleaning plants
from our shopping centers or convert them to environmentally approved systems.
Where available, we have applied and been accepted into state-sponsored
environmental programs. We have a blanket environmental insurance policy that
covers us against third-party liabilities and remediation costs on shopping
centers that currently have no known environmental contamination. We have also
placed environmental insurance, where possible, on specific properties with
known contamination, in order to mitigate our environmental risk. We believe
that the ultimate disposition of currently known environmental matters will not
have a material effect on Regency's financial position, liquidity, or
operations; however, we can give no assurance that existing environmental
studies with respect to our shopping centers have revealed all potential
environmental liabilities; that any previous owner, occupant or tenant did not
create any material environmental condition not known to us; that the current
environmental condition of the shopping centers will not be affected by tenants
and occupants, by the condition of nearby properties, or by unrelated third
parties; or that changes in applicable environmental laws and regulations or
their interpretation will not result in additional environmental liability to
us.
25
Inflation
- ---------
Inflation has remained relatively low and has had a minimal impact on
the operating performance of our shopping centers; however, substantially all of
our long-term leases contain provisions designed to mitigate the adverse impact
of inflation. Such provisions include clauses enabling us to receive percentage
rentals based on tenants' gross sales, which generally increase as prices rise;
and/or escalation clauses, which generally increase rental rates during the
terms of the leases. Such escalation clauses are often related to increases in
the consumer price index or similar inflation indices. In addition, many of our
leases are for terms of less than 10 years, which permits us to seek increased
rents upon re-rental at market rates. Most of our leases require tenants to pay
their share of operating expenses, including common area maintenance, real
estate taxes, and insurance and utilities, thereby reducing our exposure to
increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation.
26
Item 7a. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market Risk
- -----------
We are exposed to interest-rate changes primarily related to the
variable interest rate on the line of credit and the refinancing of long-term
debt which currently contain fixed interest rates. Our interest-rate risk
management objective is to limit the impact of interest-rate changes on earnings
and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these
objectives, we borrow primarily at fixed interest rates and may enter into
derivative financial instruments such as interest-rate swaps, caps and treasury
locks in order to mitigate our interest-rate risk on a related financial
instrument. We have no plans to enter into derivative or interest-rate
transactions for speculative purposes.
Our interest-rate risk is monitored using a variety of techniques. The
table below presents the principal cash flows (in thousands), weighted average
interest rates of remaining debt, and the fair value of total debt (in
thousands), by year of expected maturity to evaluate the expected cash flows and
sensitivity to interest-rate changes.
Fair
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Thereafter Total Value
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---------- ----- -----
Fixed rate debt $ 213,055 151,869 24,259 28,581 22,315 770,680 1,210,759 1,280,502
Average interest rate for all
debt 7.60% 7.60% 7.60% 7.59% 7.61% 7.61% - -
Variable rate LIBOR debt $ 211,629 25,000 - - - - 236,629 236,629
Average interest rate for all
debt 2.49% 2.49% - - - - - -
As the table incorporates only those exposures that exist as of
December 31, 2003, it does not consider those exposures or positions, which
could arise after that date. Moreover, because firm commitments are not
presented in the table above, the information presented above has limited
predictive value. As a result, our ultimate realized gain or loss with respect
to interest-rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during the
period, our hedging strategies at that time, and actual interest rates.
Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The Consolidated Financial Statements and supplementary data included
in this Report are listed in Part IV, Item 15(a).
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9a. Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's
management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness
of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the
end of the period covered by this report, and, based on their evaluation, the
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
There were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors
that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their
evaluation.
27
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Information concerning the directors of Regency is incorporated herein
by reference to Regency's definitive proxy statement to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal
year covered by this Form 10-K with respect to its 2004 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders. Information concerning the executive officers of Regency is
provided below.
MARTIN E. STEIN, JR. Mr. Stein, age 51, is Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Regency. He served as President of Regency from its
initial public offering in October 1993 until December 31, 1998. Mr. Stein also
served as President of Regency's predecessor real estate division since 1981,
and Vice President from 1976 to 1981. He is a director of Patriot Transportation
Holding, Inc., a publicly held transportation and real estate company, and Stein
Mart, Inc., a publicly held upscale discount retailer.
MARY LOU FIALA. Mrs. Fiala, age 52, became President and Chief
Operating Officer of Regency in January 1999. Before joining Regency she was
Managing Director - Security Capital U.S. Realty Strategic Group from March
1997 to January 1999. Mrs. Fiala was Senior Vice President and Director of
Stores, New England - Macy's East/Federated Department Stores from 1994 to March
1997. From 1976 to 1994, Mrs. Fiala held various merchandising and store
operations positions with Macy's/Federated Department Stores. Mrs. Fiala is a
member of the board of trustees of the International Council of Shopping Centers
and the University of North Florida Foundation.
BRUCE M. JOHNSON. Mr. Johnson, age 56, has been Managing Director and
Chief Financial Officer of Regency since its initial public offering in October
1993. Mr. Johnson also served as Executive Vice President of Regency's
predecessor real estate division from 1979 to 1993. He is a director of Brooks
Rehabilitation Hospital, a private not for profit rehabilitation hospital, and
its private parent company Brooks Health Systems.
Audit Committee, Independence, Financial Experts. Incorporated herein
by reference to Regency's definitive proxy statement to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal
year covered by this Form 10-K with respect to its 2004 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. Information
concerning filings under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act by the directors or
executive officers of Regency is incorporated herein by reference to Regency's
definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form
10-K with respect to its 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Code of Ethics. We have adopted a code of ethics applicable to our
principal executive officers, principal financial officer, principal accounting
officer and persons performing similar functions. The text of this code of
ethics may be found on our web site at "www.regencycenters.com." We intend to
post notice of any waiver from, or amendment to, any provision of our code of
ethics on our web site.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Incorporated herein by reference to Regency's definitive proxy
statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120
days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K with respect to
its 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
28
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters Equity Compensation Plan Information
(a) (b) (c)
---------------------- -------------------------- ---------------------------
Number of Number of securities
securities to be remaining available for
Issued upon future issuance under
exercise of Weighted-average equity compensation
outstanding exercise price of plans (excluding
options, warrants outstanding options, securities reflected in
Plan Category and rights warrants and rights(1) column (a))
- ------------------------------------- ---------------------- -------------------------- ---------------------------
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders.... 2,496,290 $32.13 4,610,564(2)
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders N/A N/A 10,395
---------------------- -------------------------- ---------------------------
Total 2,496,290 $32.13 4,620,959
====================== ========================== ===========================
(1) The weighted average exercise price excludes stock rights awards, which
we sometimes refer to as unvested restricted stock.
(2) Our Long Term Omnibus Plan, as amended and approved by shareholders at
our 2003 annual meeting, provides for the issuance of up to 5.0 million
shares of common stock or stock options for stock compensation;
however, outstanding unvested grants plus vested but unexercised
options cannot exceed 12% of our outstanding common stock and common
stock equivalents (excluding options and other stock equivalents
outstanding under the plan). The plan permits the grant of any type of
share-based award but limits restricted stock awards, stock rights
awards, performance shares, dividend equivalents settled in stock and
other forms of stock grants to 2,750,000 shares, of which 2,360,564
shares were available at December 31, 2003 for future issuance.
Our Stock Grant Plan for non-key employees is the only equity
compensation plan that our shareholders have not approved. This Plan provides
for the award of a stock bonus of a specified value to each non-key employee on
the 1st anniversary date and every 5th anniversary date of their employment. For
example, each non-manager employee receives $500 in shares at the specified
anniversary dates based on the average fair market value of Regency's common
stock for the most recent quarter prior to the anniversary date. A total of
30,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under this Plan,
of which 10,395 shares were available for issuance at December 31, 2003.
Information about security ownership is incorporated herein by
reference to Regency's definitive proxy statement to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal
year covered by this Form 10-K with respect to its 2004 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Incorporated herein by reference to Regency's definitive proxy
statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120
days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K with respect to
its 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Incorporated herein by reference to Regency's definitive proxy
statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120
days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K with respect to
its 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
29
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules:
Regency's 2003 financial statements and financial statement
schedule, together with the report of KPMG LLP are listed on
the index immediately preceding the financial statements at
the end of this report.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
None.
(c) Exhibits:
3. Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
(i) Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of Regency
Centers, L.P.
(ii) Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited
Partnership of Regency Centers, L.P., as amended
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(l) of Regency
Centers Corporation's Form 10-K filed March 11, 2004).
4. (a) See exhibit 3(ii) for provisions of the Partnership
Agreement of Regency Centers, L.P. defining rights of
security holders.
(b) Indenture dated July 20, 1998 between Regency Centers, L.P.,
the guarantors named therein and First Union National Bank,
as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
registration statement on Form S-4 of Regency Centers, L.P.,
No. 333-63723).
(c) Indenture dated March 9, 1999 between Regency Centers, L.P.,
the guarantors named therein and First Union National Bank,
as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
registration statement on Form S-3 of Regency Centers, L.P.,
No. 333-72899).
(d) Indenture dated December 5, 2001 between Regency Centers,
L.P., the guarantors named therein and First Union National
Bank, as trustee (incorporated by referenced to Exhibit 4.4
of Form 8-K of Regency Centers, L.P. filed December 10,
2001, File No. 0-24763).
10. Material Contracts
(a) Credit Agreement dated as of April 30, 2001 by and among
Regency Centers, L.P., Regency, each of the financial
institutions initially a signatory thereto, and Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10 of the Company's Form 10-Q filed August 14,
2001).
(i) Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of March
31, 2003, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Company's Form 10-Q filed August 12, 2003).
30
21. Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23. Consent of KPMG LLP.
31.1 Rule 15d-14 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
31.2 Rule 15d-14 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
31.3 Rule 15d-14 Certification of Chief Operating Officer.
32.1 Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
32.2 Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
32.3 Section 1350 Certification of Chief Operating Officer.
31
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.
By: Regency Centers Corporation,
General Partner
Date: March 9, 2004 By: /s/ Martin E. Stein, Jr.
----------------------------------
Martin E Stein, Jr., Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive
Officer
Date: March 9, 2004 By: /s/ Bruce M. Johnson
----------------------------------
Bruce M. Johnson, Managing
Director and Principal Financial
Officer
Date: March 9, 2004 By: /s/ J. Christian Leavitt
----------------------------------
J. Christian Leavitt, Senior Vice
President, Finance and Principal
Accounting Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
Date: March 9, 2004 /s/ Martin E. Stein, Jr.
----------------------------------------
Martin E. Stein, Jr., Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 9, 2004 /s/ Mary Lou Fiala
----------------------------------------
Mary Lou Fiala, President, Chief
Operating Officer and Director
Date: March 9, 2004 /s/ Raymond L. Bank
----------------------------------------
Raymond L. Bank, Director
Date: March 9, 2004 /s/ C. Ronald Blankenship
----------------------------------------
C. Ronald Blankenship, Director
Date: March 9, 2004 /s/ A. R. Carpenter
----------------------------------------
A. R. Carpenter, Director
Date: March 9, 2004 /s/ J. Dix Druce, Jr.
----------------------------------------
J. Dix Druce, Jr., Director
Date: March 9, 2004 /s/ Douglas S. Luke
----------------------------------------
Douglas S. Luke, Director
Date: March 9, 2004 /s/ John C. Schweitzer
----------------------------------------
John C. Schweitzer, Director
Date: March 9, 2004 /s/ Thomas G. Wattles
----------------------------------------
Thomas G. Wattles, Director
Date: March 9, 2004 /s/ Terry N. Worrell
----------------------------------------
Terry N. Worrell, Director
32
Regency Centers, L.P.
Index to Financial Statements
Regency Centers, L.P.
Independent Auditors' Report F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 F-4
Consolidated Statements of Partners' Capital for the years ended
December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-8
Financial Statement Schedule
Independent Auditors' Report on Financial Statement Schedule S-1
Schedule III - Regency Centers L.P. Combined Real Estate and
Accumulated Depreciation - December 31, 2003 S-2
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or because
information required therein is shown in the consolidated financial statements
or notes thereto.
F-1
Independent Auditors' Report
The Unit holders of Regency Centers, L.P. and the Board of Directors of
Regency Centers Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Regency Centers,
L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, partners' capital, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Regency Centers,
L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2003 in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Jacksonville, Florida
March 8, 2004
F-2
REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2003 and 2002
2003 2002
---- ----
Assets
Real estate investments at cost (notes 3 and 10):
Land $ 738,101,034 715,255,513
Buildings and improvements 1,914,074,648 1,971,588,807
------------------ -----------------
2,652,175,682 2,686,844,320
Less: accumulated depreciation 285,664,875 244,595,928
------------------ -----------------
2,366,510,807 2,442,248,392
Properties in development 369,474,460 276,085,435
Operating properties held for sale 4,200,008 5,658,905
Investments in real estate partnerships (note 3) 140,496,074 125,482,151
------------------ -----------------
Net real estate investments 2,880,681,349 2,849,474,883
Cash and cash equivalents 29,868,622 56,447,329
Notes receivable 70,781,914 56,630,876
Tenant receivables, net of allowance for uncollectible accounts
of $3,353,154 and $4,258,891 at December 31, 2003
and 2002, respectively 54,573,165 47,983,160
Deferred costs, less accumulated amortization of
$29,493,009 and $22,176,462 at December 31, 2003
and 2002, respectively 35,803,525 36,644,959
Acquired lease intangible assets, net (note 4) 10,205,493 2,634,511
Other assets 16,314,645 19,112,148
------------------ -----------------
$ 3,098,228,713 3,068,927,866
================== =================
Liabilities and Partners' Capital
Liabilities:
Notes payable (note 5) 1,257,776,805 1,253,524,045
Unsecured line of credit (note 5) 195,000,000 80,000,000
Accounts payable and other liabilities 94,279,961 76,908,233
Acquired lease intangible liabilities, net (note 4) 6,115,066 7,069,030
Tenants' security and escrow deposits 9,358,023 8,847,603
------------------ -----------------
Total liabilities 1,562,529,855 1,426,348,911
------------------ -----------------
Limited partners' interest in consolidated partnerships 4,650,626 14,825,256
------------------ -----------------
Partners' Capital:
Series A preferred units, par value $50: 1,600,000 units issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2002 - 78,800,000
Series B preferred units, par value $100: 850,000 units issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively 82,799,720 82,799,720
Series C preferred units, par value $100: 750,000 units issued, 400,000 and
750,000 units outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively 38,964,575 73,058,577
Series D preferred units, par value $100: 500,000 units issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively 49,157,977 49,157,977
Series E preferred units, par value $100: 700,000 units issued, 300,000 and
700,000 units outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively 29,237,820 68,221,579
Series F preferred units, par value $100: 240,000 units issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively 23,365,799 23,365,799
General partner; Series 3 cumulative redeemable preferred units, par value $0.01:
300,000 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2003;
liquidation preference $250 75,000,000 -
General partner; 59,907,957 and 60,007,436 units outstanding
at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively 1,205,803,000 1,221,720,073
Limited partners; 1,318,625 and 1,504,458 units outstanding
at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively 26,544,594 30,629,974
Accumulated other comprehensive income 174,747 -
------------------ -----------------
Total partners' capital 1,531,048,232 1,627,753,699
------------------ -----------------
Commitments and contingencies (notes 10 and 11)
$ 3,098,228,713 3,068,927,866
================== =================
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
Revenues:
Minimum rent (note 10) $ 275,449,673 262,720,557 239,229,405
Percentage rent 4,536,446 5,173,575 5,610,973
Recoveries from tenants 79,939,958 75,385,175 67,083,565
Management fees and commissions 6,418,937 4,616,916 3,436,821
Equity in income of investments in
real estate partnerships 11,276,409 5,764,909 3,439,397
--------------- --------------- ---------------
Total revenues 377,621,423 353,661,132 318,800,161
--------------- --------------- ---------------
Operating expenses:
Depreciation and amortization 74,741,180 67,845,443 60,471,535
Operating and maintenance 53,207,353 49,554,740 44,362,263
General and administrative 24,229,199 22,756,590 19,785,521
Real estate taxes 39,754,998 37,705,837 34,520,818
Other expenses 4,993,051 (1,801,588) 5,131,802
--------------- --------------- ---------------
Total operating expenses 196,925,781 176,061,022 164,271,939
--------------- --------------- ---------------
Other expense (income)
Interest expense, net of interest income of $2,355,940, $2,334,329
and $5,571,304 in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively 84,017,406 84,222,269 67,598,029
Gain on sale of operating properties and properties in development (48,717,043) (20,904,828) (28,757,294)
Provision for loss on operating and development properties 1,249,175 1,070,000 1,595,136
Other income (note 5) - (2,383,524) -
--------------- --------------- ---------------
Total other expense 36,549,538 62,003,917 40,435,871
--------------- --------------- ---------------
Income before minority interests 144,146,104 115,596,193 114,092,351
Minority interest of limited partners (501,260) (492,137) (721,090)
--------------- --------------- ---------------
Income from continuing operations 143,644,844 115,104,056 113,371,261
Discontinued operations:
Operating income from discontinued operations 3,660,271 15,193,504 23,324,956
Gain on sale of operating properties and properties in development 16,354,523 16,498,759 -
--------------- --------------- ---------------
Income from discontinued operations 20,014,794 31,692,263 23,324,956
--------------- --------------- ---------------
Net income 163,659,638 146,796,319 136,696,217
Preferred unit distributions and original issue costs (34,001,261) (33,475,008) (33,475,007)
--------------- --------------- ---------------
Net income for common unit holders $ 129,658,377 113,321,311 103,221,210
=============== =============== ===============
Income per common unit - basic (note 8):
Continuing operations $ 1.80 1.32 1.30
Discontinued operations $ 0.33 0.53 0.40
--------------- --------------- ---------------
Net income for common unit holders per unit $ 2.13 1.85 1.70
=============== =============== ===============
Income per common unit - diluted (note 8):
Continuing operations $ 1.79 1.32 1.30
Discontinued operations $ 0.33 0.52 0.39
--------------- --------------- ---------------
Net income for common unit holders per unit $ 2.12 1.84 1.69
=============== =============== ===============
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners' Capital
For the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
General Accumulated
Partner Other Total
Series A-F Preferred and Limited Comprehensive Partners'
Preferred Units Common Units Partner Income Capital
--------------- ------------ ------- ------ -------
Balance at December 31, 2000 375,407,777 1,225,414,966 30,409,370 - 1,631,232,113
Net income 33,475,007 100,664,207 2,557,003 - 136,696,217
Costs from the issuance of
preferred units (4,125) - - - (4,125)
Cash distributions for dividends (117,825,613) (3,038,012) (120,863,625)
Preferred unit distribution (33,475,007) - - - (33,475,007)
Units issued to acquire limited
partners' interest in
consolidated partnerships - - 4,383,468 - 4,383,468
Units converted for cash - - (110,487) - (110,487)
Common Units issued as a result of
common stock issued by Regency,
net of repurchases - 8,162,261 - - 8,162,261
Common Units exchanged for common
stock of Regency - 3,220,453 (3,220,453) - -
Units issued for acquisition
of real estate or investments in
real estate partnerships - 43,196 498,688 - 541,884
Reallocation of limited partners'
interest - (628,614) 628,614 - -
--------------- ---------------- --------------- ------------- -----------------
Balance at December 31, 2001 $ 375,403,652 1,219,050,856 32,108,191 - 1,626,562,699
Net income 33,475,008 110,524,668 2,796,643 - 146,796,319
Cash distributions for dividends - (121,828,367) (3,157,241) - (124,985,608)
Preferred unit distribution (33,475,008) - - - (33,475,008)
Purchase of Regency stock and
corresponding units - (2,725,000) - - (2,725,000)
Units converted for cash - - (83,232) - (83,232)
Common Units issued as a result of
common stock issued by Regency,
net of repurchases - 15,663,529 - - 15,663,529
Common Units exchanged for common
stock of Regency - 1,287,607 (1,287,607) - -
Reallocation of limited partners'
interest - (253,220) 253,220 - -
--------------- ---------------- --------------- ------------- -----------------
Balance at December 31, 2002 $ 375,403,652 1,221,720,073 30,629,974 - 1,627,753,699
Net income 29,826,131 130,789,495 3,044,012 - 163,659,638
Change in fair value of derivative
instruments - - - 174,747 174,747
-----------------
Total comprehensive income - - - - 163,834,385
Redemption of preferred units (151,877,761) - - (151,877,761)
Cash distributions for dividends - (124,878,147) (2,900,245) - (127,778,392)
Preferred unit distribution (29,826,131) (4,175,130) - - (34,001,261)
Purchase of Regency stock and
corresponding units (150,501,884) - - (150,501,884)
Units converted for cash - - (1,793,502) - (1,793,502)
Series 3 Preferred units issued - 75,000,000 - - 75,000,000
Common Units issued as a result of
common stock issued by Regency,
net of repurchases - 130,412,948 - - 130,412,948
Common Units exchanged for common
stock of Regency - 3,616,700 (3,616,700) - -
Reallocation of limited partners'
interest - (1,181,055) 1,181,055 - -
--------------- ---------------- --------------- ------------- -----------------
Balance at December 31, 2003 $ 223,525,891 1,280,803,000 26,544,594 174,747 1,531,048,232
=============== ================ =============== ============= =================
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 163,659,638 146,796,319 136,696,217
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 75,022,774 74,416,757 67,505,587
Deferred loan cost and debt premium amortization 1,099,418 1,635,944 1,136,734
Services provided by Regency in exchange for Common Units 11,326,866 9,517,193 6,217,572
Minority interest of limited partners 501,260 492,137 721,090
Equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships (11,276,409) (5,764,909) (3,439,397)
Gain on sale of operating properties (25,060,219) (6,150,379) (699,376)
Provision for loss on operating and development properties 1,968,520 4,369,480 1,595,136
Other income - (2,383,524) -
Distributions from operations of investments in real estate
partnerships 14,760,470 5,522,475 1,801,340
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Tenant receivables (6,590,005) (863,731) (9,304,128)
Deferred leasing costs (11,021,273) (12,917,755) (11,691,159)
Other assets 1,244,179 (10,885,722) (4,213,411)
Accounts payable and other liabilities 11,734,677 (15,795,052) 303,740
Tenants' security and escrow deposits 510,420 698,881 (771,305)
--------------- -------------- --------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 227,880,316 188,688,114 185,858,640
--------------- -------------- --------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition and development of real estate (456,516,480) (335,999,241) (348,539,784)
Proceeds from sale of real estate investments 237,033,325 427,807,492 144,984,022
Repayment of notes receivable, net 117,642,782 37,363,312 67,582,696
Investments in real estate partnerships (14,881,018) (46,018,670) (43,146,334)
Distributions received from investments in real estate
partnerships 20,482,953 11,784,071 15,010,552
--------------- -------------- --------------
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities (96,238,438) 94,936,964 (164,108,848)
--------------- -------------- --------------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net proceeds from the issuance of Regency stock and
Common units 127,428,166 9,932,137 65,264
Repurchase of Regency stock and corresponding Common Units (150,501,884) (2,725,000) (155,381)
Redemption of preferred partnership units (155,750,000) - -
Cash paid for conversion of common Units by limited partner (1,793,502) (83,232) (110,487)
Net distributions to limited partners in consolidated partnerships (10,675,890) (384,000) (5,354,985)
Distributions to preferred unit holders (30,129,022) (33,475,008) (33,475,007)
Cash distributions for dividends (127,778,392) (124,985,608) (120,863,625)
Net proceeds from issuance of Series 3 preferred units 72,294,967 - -
Net proceeds from fixed rate unsecured notes - 249,625,000 239,582,400
Additional costs from issuance of preferred units - - (4,125)
Proceeds (repayment) of unsecured line of credit, net 115,000,000 (294,000,000) (92,000,000)
Proceeds from notes payable 30,821,695 7,082,128 -
Repayment of notes payable, net (13,485,327) (58,306,361) (67,273,620)
Scheduled principal payments (13,453,217) (5,629,822) (6,146,318)
Deferred loan costs (198,179) (2,081,247) (9,148,539)
--------------- -------------- --------------
Net cash used in financing activities (158,220,585) (255,031,013) (94,884,423)
--------------- -------------- --------------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (26,578,707) 28,594,065 (73,134,631)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year 56,447,329 27,853,264 100,987,895
--------------- -------------- --------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year $ 29,868,622 56,447,329 27,853,264
=============== ============== ==============
F-6
REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
continued
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information - cash paid
for interest (net of capitalized interest of $13,105,955,
$13,752,848 and $21,195,419 in 2003, 2002 and 2001,
respectively) $ 84,666,097 78,450,117 67,546,988
=============== ============== ==============
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash transactions:
Mortgage loans assumed for the acquisition of real estate $ 15,341,889 46,747,196 8,120,912
=============== ============== ==============
Notes receivable taken in connection with sales of operating
properties and properties in development $ 131,793,820 61,489,247 33,663,744
=============== ============== ==============
Real estate contributed as investments in real estate partnerships $ 24,099,919 29,485,749 12,418,278
=============== ============== ==============
Mortgage debt assumed by purchaser on sale of real estate $ 13,557,263 4,569,703 -
=============== ============== ==============
Exchangeable operating partnership units and common stock
issued for the acquisition of partners' interest in
investments in real estate partnerships $ - - 9,754,225
=============== ============== ==============
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
Regency Centers, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Organization and Principles of Consolidation
Regency Centers, L.P. ("RCLP" or "Partnership") is the primary
entity through which Regency Centers Corporation ("Regency" or
"Company"), a self-administered and self-managed real estate
investment trust ("REIT"), conducts all of its business and
owns all of its assets.
The Partnership was formed in 1996 for the purpose of
acquiring certain real estate properties. At December 31,
2003, Regency owns approximately 98% of the outstanding common
units of the Partnership.
The Partnership's ownership interests are represented by
Units, of which there are i) six series of preferred Units,
ii) common Units owned by the limited partners and iii) common
Units owned by Regency which serves as the general partner.
Each outstanding common Unit owned by a limited partner is
exchangeable, on a one share per one Unit basis, for the
common stock of Regency or for cash at Regency's election.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Partnership, its wholly owned subsidiaries,
and also partnerships in which it has voting control. All
significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
(b) Revenues
The Partnership leases space to tenants under agreements with
varying terms. Leases are accounted for as operating leases
with minimum rent recognized on a straight-line basis over the
term of the lease regardless of when payments are due. Accrued
rents are included in tenant receivables.
Substantially all of the lease agreements contain provisions
that grant additional rents based on tenants' sales volume
(contingent or percentage rent) and reimbursement of the
tenants' share of real estate taxes and certain common area
maintenance ("CAM") costs. Percentage rents are recognized
when the tenants achieve the specified targets as defined in
their lease agreements. Recovery of real estate taxes and CAM
costs are recognized as the respective costs are incurred in
accordance with their lease agreements.
The Partnership accounts for profit recognition on sales of
real estate in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards
Board ("FASB") Statement No. 66, "Accounting for Sales of Real
Estate." In summary, profits from sales will not be recognized
by the Partnership unless a sale has been consummated; the
buyer's initial and continuing investment is adequate to
demonstrate a commitment to pay for the property; the
Partnership has transferred to the buyer the usual risks and
rewards of ownership; and the Partnership does not have
substantial continuing involvement with the property.
The Partnership has been engaged by joint ventures to provide
asset and property management services for their shopping
centers. The fees are market based and generally calculated as
a percentage of revenues earned and the estimated values of
the properties and recognized as services are provided.
F-8
Regency Centers, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003
(c) Real Estate Investments
Land, buildings and improvements are recorded at cost. All
direct and indirect costs related to development activities
are capitalized. Included in these costs are interest and real
estate taxes incurred during construction as well as estimates
for the portion of internal costs that are incremental, and
deemed directly or indirectly related to development activity.
Maintenance and repairs that do not improve or extend the
useful lives of the respective assets are reflected in
operating and maintenance expense. Depreciation is computed
using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of
up to 40 years for buildings and improvements, term of lease
for tenant improvements, and three to seven years for
furniture and equipment.
The Partnership allocates the purchase price of acquired
properties to land, buildings, and identifiable intangible
assets based on their respective fair values. Management uses
various methods to determine the fair value of acquired land
and buildings, including replacement cost, discounted cash
flow analysis, and comparable sales. Identifiable intangibles
include amounts allocated to acquired leases for rental rates
that are above or below market and the value of in-place
leases. Intangibles related to in place leases are amortized
over the weighted average life of the leases. Intangibles
related to below market rate leases are amortized to minimum
rent over the remaining terms of the underlying leases.
On January 1, 2002, the Partnership adopted SFAS No. 144,
"Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets" ("Statement 144"). In accordance with Statement 144,
operating properties held for sale includes only those
properties available for immediate sale in their present
condition and for which management believes it is probable
that a sale of the property will be completed within one year.
Operating properties held for sale are carried at the lower of
cost or fair value less costs to sell. Depreciation and
amortization are suspended during the held for sale period.
The Partnership reviews its real estate portfolio for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
Regency determines whether impairment has occurred by
comparing the property's carrying value to an estimate of the
future undiscounted cash flows. In the event impairment
exists, assets are adjusted to fair value, for held and used
assets, and fair value less costs to sell, for held for sale
assets. During 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Partnership recorded a
provision for loss of $2.0 million, $4.4 million, and $1.6
million, respectively, to adjust operating properties to their
estimated fair value. The fair values of the operating
properties were determined by using prices for similar assets
in their respective markets. The provision for loss on
properties subsequently sold has been reclassified to
discontinued operations.
The Partnership's properties generally have operations and
cash flows that can be clearly distinguished from the rest of
the Partnership. In accordance with Statement 144, the
operations and gains on sales reported in discontinued
operations include those operating properties and properties
in development that have been sold and for which operations
and cash flows can be clearly distinguished. The operations
from these properties have been eliminated from ongoing
operations and the Partnership will not have continuing
involvement after disposition. Prior periods have been
restated to reflect the operations of these properties as
discontinued operations. The operations and gains on sales of
operating properties sold to real estate partnerships in which
the Partnership has some continuing involvement are included
in income from continuing operations.
F-9
Regency Centers, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003
(d) Income Taxes
The Partnership is not liable for federal income taxes and
each partner reports its allocable share of income and
deductions on its respective return; accordingly no provision
for income taxes is required in the consolidated financial
statements.
The Company believes it qualifies, and intends to continue to
qualify, as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code (the
"Code"). As a REIT, the Company is allowed to reduce taxable
income by all or a portion of its distributions to
stockholders. As distributions have exceeded taxable income,
no provision for federal income taxes has been made in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Earnings and profits, which determine the taxability of
dividends to stockholders, differs from net income reported
for financial reporting purposes primarily because of
differences in depreciable lives and cost bases of the
shopping centers, as well as other timing differences.
The net book basis of real estate assets exceeds the tax basis
by approximately $113 million and $115 million at December 31,
2003 and 2002, respectively, primarily due to the difference
between the cost basis of the assets acquired and their
carryover basis recorded for tax purposes.
The following summarizes the tax status of dividends paid
during the years ended December 31 (unaudited):
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
Dividend per share $ 2.08 2.04 2.00
Ordinary income 74.04% 71.00% 83.00%
Capital gain .49% 1.00% 3.00%
Return of capital 12.84% 22.00% 13.00%
Unrecaptured Section
1250 gain 7.16% 4.00% 1.00%
Qualified 5-year gain - 2.00% -
Post-May 5 gain 5.47% - -
The Partnership and Regency Realty Group, Inc., ("RRG"), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Partnership, jointly elected
for RRG to be treated as a Taxable REIT Subsidiary of the
Partnership as defined in Section 856(l) of the Code. Such
election is not expected to impact the tax treatment of either
the Partnership or RRG.
RRG is subject to federal and state income taxes and files
separate tax returns. RRG recognized a provision (benefit) for
income taxes of $2.9 million, ($391,400), and $2 million in
2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
(e) Deferred Costs
Deferred costs include deferred leasing costs and deferred
loan costs, net of amortization. Such costs are amortized over
the periods through lease expiration or loan maturity.
Deferred leasing costs consist of internal and external
commissions associated with leasing the Partnership's shopping
centers. Net deferred leasing costs were $28.0 million and
$25.7 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Deferred loan costs consist of initial direct and incremental
costs associated with financing activities. Net deferred loan
costs were $7.8 million and $10.9 million at December 31, 2003
and 2002, respectively.
F-10
Regency Centers, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003
(f) Earnings per Unit and Treasury Stock
Basic net income per unit is computed based upon the weighted
average number of common units outstanding during the year.
Diluted net income per unit also includes common unit
equivalents for stock options, exchangeable operating
partnership units, and preferred stock when dilutive. See note
8 for the calculation of earnings per unit.
Repurchases of the Company's common stock (net of shares
retired) are recorded at cost and are reflected as Treasury
stock in the consolidated statements of stockholders' equity.
Outstanding shares do not include treasury shares. Concurrent
with the Treasury stock repurchases by Regency, the
Partnership repurchases the same amount of general partnership
units from Regency.
(g) Cash and Cash Equivalents
Any instruments which have an original maturity of 90 days or
less when purchased are considered cash equivalents. Cash
distributions of normal operating earnings from investments in
real estate partnerships and cash received from the sales of
development properties are included in cash flows from
operations in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
(h) Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America requires the Partnership's management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
(i) Stock-Based Compensation
Regency is committed to contribute to the Partnership all
proceeds from the exercise of options or other stock-based
awards granted under Regency's Stock Option and Incentive
Plan. Regency's ownership in the Partnership will be increased
based on the amount of proceeds contributed to the
Partnership.
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure"
("Statement 148"). Statement 148 provides alternative methods
of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based
method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In
addition, Statement 148 amends the disclosure requirements of
Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation"
("Statement 123"), to require more prominent and frequent
disclosures in financial statements about the effects of
stock-based compensation. As permitted under Statement 123 and
Statement 148, the Partnership will continue to follow the
accounting guidelines pursuant to Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees"
("Opinion 25"), for stock-based compensation and to furnish
the pro forma disclosures as required under Statement 148. See
note 9 for further discussion of stock options.
F-11
Regency Centers, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003
(i) Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
The Company has a Long-Term Omnibus Plan (the "Plan") pursuant
to which the Board of Directors may grant stock options and
other stock-based awards to officers, directors and other key
employees. The Plan allows the Company to issue up to 5.0
million shares in the form of common stock or stock options,
but limits the issuance of common stock excluding stock
options to no more than 2.75 million shares. At December 31,
2003, there were approximately 4.61 million shares available
for grant under the Plan either through options or restricted
stock of which 2.36 million shares are limited to common stock
awards other than stock options. The Plan also limits
outstanding awards to no more than 12% of outstanding common
stock. Stock options, granted under the Plan, are granted with
an exercise price equal to the stock's fair market value at
the date of grant. All stock options granted have ten year
lives, contain vesting terms of one to five years from the
date of grant and may have certain dividend equivalent rights.
Restricted stock granted under the Plan, generally vests over
a period of four years, although certain grants cliff vest
after eight years, but contain a provision that allows for
accelerated vesting over a shorter term if certain performance
criteria are met. Compensation expense is measured at the
grant date and recognized ratably over the vesting period. The
Partnership considers the likelihood of meeting the
performance criteria in determining the amount to expense on a
periodic basis. In general, such criteria have been met, thus
expense is recognized at a rate commensurate with the actual
vesting period. Restricted stock grants also have certain
dividend equivalent rights under the Plan, which are expensed
in a manner similar to the underlying stock.
The following table represents restricted stock granted during
the respective years:
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
Fair value of stock at
date of grant $ 39.97 31.27 26.40
4-year stock grants 219,787 232,758 222,508
8-year stock grants 64,649 103,592 106,452
------------------- ---------------- ------------------
Total stock grants 284,436 336,350 328,960
=================== ================ ==================
The 4-year stock grants vest at the rate of 25% per year and
the 8-year stock grants cliff vest after eight years, but have
the ability to accelerate vesting under the terms described
above. Based upon restricted stock vesting in 2003, 2002 and
2001, the Partnership recorded compensation expense of $7.5
million, $5.6 million and $2.5 million, respectively, for
restricted stock. During 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Partnership
recorded compensation expense for dividend equivalents of $3.5
million, $3.2 million, and $3.1 million respectively, for
undistributed restricted stock and unexercised stock options.
In previous years, as part of the Plan, the Company structured
stock purchase plans ("SPP loans") whereby executives could
acquire common stock at fair market value by investing their
own capital in combination with loans provided by Regency.
These interest-bearing, full recourse loans were secured by
stock, which was held as collateral by Regency. These loans
provided for partial forgiveness of the unpaid principal
balance over time based upon specified performance criteria
and the passage of time. The Company ceased making these types
of loans after 1998 and has not originated any new personal
loans to employees since that date. Effective September 30,
2002, all participants agreed to repay the entire balance of
their loans outstanding with a portion of the common shares
held as collateral, valued at fair market value as of
September 30, 2002. The Company, in return, granted the
participants 45,195 shares of restricted stock with a fair
value of $31.00 and stock options to provide them with the
same level of compensation benefits that they would have
received under existing agreements for specified forgiveness
amounts. These grants were made in accordance with the
existing Plan. During 2002, $240,491 of unpaid principal was
repaid in cash, $6 million was repaid through the surrendering
of shares held as collateral, and $575,741 was forgiven and
recorded as compensation expense.
F-12
Regency Centers, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003
(i) Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
The following table represents the assumptions used for the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model for options granted in the
respective year:
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
Per share weighted average fair value
of stock options $ 2.23 1.94 2.32
Expected dividend yield 5.5% 6.8% 7.3%
Risk-free interest rate 2.2% 2.0% 5.2%
Expected volatility 16.0% 19.1% 20.0%
Expected life in years 2.4 2.5 6.0
The Partnership applies Opinion 25 in accounting for its Plan,
and accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for
its stock options in the consolidated financial statements.
Had the Partnership determined compensation cost based on the
fair value at the grant date for its stock options under
Statement 123, the Partnership's net income for common unit
holders would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts
indicated below (in thousands except per unit data):
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
Net income for common unit holders
as reported: $ 129,658 113,321 103,221
Add: stock-based employee compensation
expense included in reported net income 11,327 9,517 6,218
Deduct: total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under
fair value based methods for all awards 15,455 13,470 7,141
--------------------------------------------
Pro forma net income $ 125,530 109,368 102,298
============================================
Earnings per unit:
Basic - as reported $ 2.13 1.85 1.70
============================================
Basic - pro forma $ 2.06 1.78 1.68
============================================
Diluted - as reported $ 2.12 1.84 1.69
============================================
Diluted - pro forma $ 2.05 1.77 1.68
============================================
(j) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
In December 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN
46") (revised December 2003 ("FIN 46R")), "Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities", which addresses how a business
enterprise should evaluate whether it has controlling
financial interest in an entity through means other than
voting rights and accordingly should consolidate the entity.
FIN 46R replaces FIN 46, which was issued in January 2003. FIN
46R is applicable immediately to a variable interest entity
created after January 31, 2003 and as of the first interim
period ending after March 15, 2004 to those variable interest
entities created before February 1, 2003 and not already
consolidated under FIN 46 in previously issued financial
statements. The Partnership did not create any variable
interest entities after January 31, 2003. The Partnership has
analyzed the applicability of this interpretation to its
structures created before February 1, 2003 and does not
believe its adoption will have a material effect on the
results of operations.
F-13
Regency Centers, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003
(k) Segment Reporting
The Partnership's business is investing in retail shopping
centers through direct ownership or through joint ventures.
The Partnership actively manages its portfolio of retail
shopping centers and may from time to time make decisions to
sell lower performing properties, or developments not meeting
its long-term investment objectives. The proceeds of sales are
invested into higher quality retail shopping centers through
acquisitions or new developments, which management believes
will meet its planned rate of return. It is management's
intent that all retail shopping centers will be owned or
developed for investment purposes. The Partnership's revenue
and net income are generated from the operation of its
investment portfolio. The Partnership will also earn
incidental fees from third parties for services provided to
manage and lease retail shopping centers owned through joint
ventures.
The Partnership's portfolio is located throughout the United
States; however, management does not distinguish or group its
operations on a geographical basis for purposes of allocating
resources or measuring performance. The Partnership reviews
operating and financial data for each property on an
individual basis, therefore, the Partnership defines an
operating segment as its individual properties. No individual
property constitutes more than 10% of the Partnership's
combined revenue, net income or assets, and thus the
individual properties have been aggregated into one reportable
segment based upon their similarities with regard to both the
nature of the centers, tenants and operational processes, as
well as long-term average financial performance. In addition,
no single tenant accounts for 10% or more of revenue and none
of the shopping centers are located outside the United States.
(l) Derivative Financial Instruments
The Partnership adopted SFAS No. 133 "Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" as amended
("Statement 133"), on January 1, 2001. Statement 133 requires
that all derivative instruments be recorded on the balance
sheet at their fair value. Gains or losses resulting from
changes in the values of those derivatives would be accounted
for depending on the use of the derivative and whether it
qualifies for hedge accounting. The Partnership uses
derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps
to mitigate its interest rate risk on a related financial
instrument. Statement 133 requires that changes in fair value
of derivatives that qualify as cash flow hedges be recognized
in other comprehensive income (loss) while the ineffective
portion of the derivative's change in fair value be recognized
immediately in earnings.
To determine the fair value of derivative instruments, the
Partnership uses standard market conventions and techniques
such as discounted cash flow analysis, option pricing models
and termination costs at each balance sheet date. All methods
of assessing fair value result in a general approximation of
value, and such value may never actually be realized.
(m) Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities
and Equity
In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Accounting Standards
No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity" ("Statement
150"). Statement 150 affects the accounting for certain
financial instruments, including requiring companies having
consolidated entities with specified termination dates to
treat minority owners' interests in such entities as
liabilities in an amount based on the fair value of the
entities. Although Statement 150 was originally effective July
1, 2003, the FASB has
F-14
Regency Centers, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003
(m) Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities
and Equity (continued)
indefinitely deferred certain provisions related to
classification and measurement requirements for mandatorily
redeemable financial instruments that become subject to
Statement 150 solely as a result of consolidation including
minority interests of entities with specified termination
dates. As a result, Statement 150 has no impact on the
Partnership's consolidated statements of operations for the
year ended December 31, 2003.
At December 31, 2003, the Partnership held a majority interest
in five consolidated entities with specified termination dates
ranging from 2012 to 2049. The minority owners' interests in
these entities are to be settled upon termination by
distribution of either cash or specific assets of the
underlying entities. The estimated fair value of minority
interests in entities with specified termination dates was
approximately $8.5 million at December 31, 2003 as compared to
the carrying value of $4.7 million. The Partnership has no
other financial instruments that currently are affected by
Statement 150.
(n) Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2002 and 2001
amounts to conform to classifications adopted in 2003.
2. Discontinued Operations
During 2003, the Partnership sold 100% of its interest in 14 operating
properties for proceeds of $103.7 million and the combined operating
income and gain of $20.0 million on these sales are included in
discontinued operations. The revenues from properties included in
discontinued operations, including properties sold in 2003 and 2002, as
well as operating properties held for sale, were $8.7 million, $34.8
million and $41.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002
and 2001, respectively. The operating income from these properties was
$3.7 million, $15.2 million and $23.3 million for the years ended
December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
3. Real Estate Investments
During 2003, the Partnership acquired four operating properties from
third parties for $75.4 million. During 2002, the Partnership acquired
five operating properties for $106.7 million. The acquisitions were
accounted for as purchases and the results of their operations are
included in the consolidated financial statements from the respective
dates of acquisition. Acquisitions (either individually or in the
aggregate) were not significant to the operations of the Partnership in
the periods in which they were acquired or the period preceding the
acquisition.
The Partnership accounts for all investments in which it owns 50% or
less and does not have a controlling financial interest using the
equity method. The Partnership's combined investment in these
partnerships was $140.5 million and $125.5 million at December 31, 2003
and 2002, respectively. Net income, which includes all operating
results, as well as gains and losses on sales of properties within the
joint ventures, is allocated to the Partnership in accordance with the
respective partnership agreements. Such allocations of net income are
recorded in equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships
in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
F-15
Regency Centers, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003
3. Real Estate Investments (continued)
The Partnership has a 25% equity interest in Macquarie
CountryWide-Regency, LLC ("MCWR"), a joint venture with an affiliate of
Macquarie CountryWide Trust of Australia, a Sydney, Australia-based
property trust focused on investing in grocery-anchored shopping
centers. During 2003, MCWR acquired 12 shopping centers from the
Partnership for $232.9 million, for which the Partnership received cash
of $79.4 million, and notes receivable of $95.3 million. During 2003,
MCWR repaid $69.3 million of the notes and in February 2004, MCWR
repaid an additional $10.5 million. The note receivable has an interest
rate of LIBOR plus 1.5% and matures on March 31, 2004. MCWR is
currently in the process of placing third party, fixed-rate mortgages
on certain properties, the proceeds of which will be used to repay the
remaining balance of $15.5 million. The Partnership recognized gains on
these sales of $25.7 million recorded as gain on sale of operating
properties and properties in development. During 2002, MCWR acquired 11
shopping centers from the Partnership for $145.2 million, for which the
Partnership received net proceeds of $83.8 million and a note
receivable of $25.1 million. MCWR repaid the note receivable during
2003. The Partnership recognized gains on these sales of $11.1 million.
During 2003, MCWR sold two shopping centers to third parties for $20.1
million.
The Partnership also has a 20% equity interest in Columbia Regency
Retail Partners, LLC ("Columbia"), a joint venture with the Oregon
State Treasury that was formed for the purpose of investing in retail
shopping centers. During 2003, Columbia acquired two shopping centers
from third parties that will have a total investment at completion of
$39.1 million and sold one shopping center to a third party for $46.2
million with a gain of $9.3 million. During 2002, Columbia acquired one
shopping center from the Partnership for $19.5 million, for which the
Partnership received cash of $15.6 million.
Recognition of gains from sales to joint ventures is recorded on only
that portion of the sales not attributable to our ownership interest.
The gains and operations are not recorded as discontinued operations
because of our continuing involvement in these shopping centers.
Columbia and MCWR intend to continue to acquire retail shopping
centers, some of which they may acquire directly from the Partnership.
For those properties acquired from third parties, the Partnership is
required to contribute its pro-rata share of the purchase price to the
partnership.
With the exception of Columbia and MCWR, both of which intend to
continue expanding their investment in shopping centers, the
investments in real estate partnerships represent single asset entities
formed for the purpose of developing or owning retail based commercial
real estate.
The Partnership's investments in real estate partnerships as of
December 31, 2003 and 2002 consist of the following (in thousands):
Ownership 2003 2002
---- ----
Columbia Regency Retail Partners, LLC 20% $ 40,267 42,413
Macquarie CountryWide-Regency, LLC 25% 39,071 22,281
RRG-RMC Tracy, LLC 50% 23,529 23,269
OTR/Regency Texas Realty Holdings, L.P. 30% 16,090 15,992
Tinwood, LLC 50% 10,397 10,983
Regency Woodlands/Kuykendahl, Ltd. 50% 5,374 7,973
Jog Road, LLC 50% 3,014
2,571
Hermosa Venture 2002, LLC 27% 2,754 -
------------- -------------
$ 140,496 125,482
============= =============
F-16
Regency Centers, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003
3. Real Estate Investments (continued)
Summarized financial information for the unconsolidated investments on
a combined basis, is as follows (in thousands):
December 31, December 31,
2003 2002
---- ----
Balance Sheet:
Investment in real estate, net $ 727,530 553,118
Other assets 84,660
15,721
---------------- -----------------
Total assets $ 812,190 568,839
================ =================
Notes payable $ 322,238 167,071
Other liabilities 14,102 10,386
Equity and partners' capital 475,850 391,382
---------------- -----------------
Total liabilities and equity $ 812,190 568,839
================ =================
Unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures had notes payable of
$322.2 million at December 31, 2003 and the Partnership's proportionate
share of these loans was $74.4 million. The Partnership does not
guarantee any debt of these partnerships beyond our ownership
percentage.
The revenues and expenses on a combined basis are summarized as follows
for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001:
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
Statement of Operations:
Total revenues $ 76,157 42,073 24,080
Total expenses 36,555 21,307 13,215
------------- ---------------- ---------------
Net income $ 39,602 20,766 10,865
============= ================ ===============
4. Acquired Lease Intangibles
Effective July 1, 2001, the Partnership adopted FAS 141, "Business
Combinations", to account for the acquisition of shopping centers that
are considered businesses. In accordance with FAS 141, identifiable
intangible assets are valued and recorded at acquisition date. Such
intangibles include the value of in-place leases and above or
below-market leases.
Acquired lease intangible assets are net of accumulated amortization of
$405,327 and $37,096 at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These
assets have a weighted average amortization period of seven years. The
aggregate amortization expense from acquired leases was $368,231 and
$37,096 during 2003 and 2002, respectively. Acquired lease intangible
liabilities are net of previously accreted minimum rent of $953,964 at
December 31, 2003 and have a weighted average amortization period of
seven years.
F-17
Regency Centers, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003
4. Acquired Lease Intangibles (continued)
The estimated aggregate amortization amounts from acquired lease
intangibles for each of the next five years are to be classified as
follows:
Amortization
Year Ending December 31, Expense Minimum Rent
------------------------------------- ----------------- ------------------
2004 $ 1,872,917 953,964
2005 1,872,917 953,964
2006 1,872,917 953,964
2007 972,485 953,964
2008 917,927 953,964
5. Notes Payable and Unsecured Line of Credit
The Partnership's outstanding debt at December 31, 2003 and 2002
consists of the following (in thousands):
2003 2002
---- ----
Notes Payable:
Fixed rate mortgage loans $ 217,001 229,551
Variable rate mortgage loans 41,629 24,998
Fixed rate unsecured loans 999,147 998,975
--------------- ---------------
Total notes payable 1,257,777 1,253,524
Unsecured line of credit 195,000 80,000
--------------- ---------------
Total $ 1,452,777 1,333,524
=============== ===============
Interest rates paid on the unsecured line of credit (the "Line"), which
are based on LIBOR plus .85%, were 1.975% and 2.288% at December 31,
2003 and 2002, respectively. The spread that the Partnership pays on
the Line is dependent upon maintaining specific investment grade
ratings. The Partnership is required to comply, and is in compliance
with, certain financial and other covenants customary with this type of
unsecured financing. The Line is used primarily to finance the
acquisition and development of real estate, but is also available for
general working capital purposes. The Line matures on April 30, 2004,
but contains a one-year extension option. The Partnership has executed
a commitment with the lead bank under the Line and expects to renew it
for a term of three years from the original maturity date.
Mortgage loans are secured by certain real estate properties and may be
prepaid, but could be subject to a yield-maintenance premium. Mortgage
loans are generally due in monthly installments of interest and
principal and mature over various terms through 2023. Variable interest
rates on mortgage loans are currently based on LIBOR plus a spread in a
range of 125 to 150 basis points. Fixed interest rates on mortgage
loans range from 5.65% to 9.50%.
In June 2003, the Partnership assumed debt with a fair value of $13.3
million related to the acquisition of a property, which includes a debt
premium of $797,303 based upon the above market interest rate of the
debt instrument. The debt premium is being amortized over the term of
the related debt instrument.
F-18
Regency Centers, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003
5. Notes Payable and Unsecured Line of Credit (continued)
During 2002, the Partnership extinguished the debt on an operating
property for the face amount of the note, resulting in the recognition
of a gain of $2.4 million on early extinguishment representing the
remaining unamortized premium recorded upon assumption of the debt. The
gain has been recorded in other income on the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
As of December 31, 2003, scheduled principal repayments on notes
payable and the Line were as follows (in thousands):
Scheduled
Principal Term Loan Total
Scheduled Payments by Year Payments Maturities Payments
-------------------------- -------------- --------------- ---------------
2004 (includes the Line) $ 5,344 419,340 424,684
2005 3,954 172,915 176,869
2006 3,476 20,783 24,259
2007 2,891 25,690 28,581
2008 2,697 19,618 22,315
Beyond 5 Years 21,119 749,561 770,680
Unamortized debt premiums - 5,389 5,389
------------ -------------- ---------------
Total $ 39,481 1,413,296 1,452,777
============ ============== ===============
6. Derivative Financial Instruments
The Partnership is exposed to capital market risk, such as changes in
interest rates. In order to manage the volatility relating to interest
rate risk, the Partnership may enter into interest rate hedging
arrangements from time to time. The Partnership does not utilize
derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
In July and September, 2003, the Partnership entered into two
forward-starting interest rate swaps of $96.5 million and $47.7
million, respectively. The Partnership designated the $144.2 million
swaps as hedges to effectively fix the rate on a refinancing expected
in April 2004. The fair value of the swaps was an asset of $174,747 as
of December 31, 2003, and is recorded in other assets in the
accompanying balance sheet. The swaps qualify for hedge accounting
under Statement 133; therefore, changes in fair value are recorded
through other comprehensive income. No hedge ineffectiveness has been
incurred or recognized to date on these swaps. Amounts reported in
accumulated other comprehensive income related to these swaps will be
reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the
forecasted refinancing. The Partnership estimates that an additional
$13,106 will be reclassified to interest expense in 2004.
7. Regency's Stockholders' Equity and Partners' Capital
(a) The Company, through RCLP, has issued Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Units ("Preferred Units") in various amounts since
1998. The issues were sold primarily to institutional
investors in private placements for $100 per unit. The
Preferred Units, which may be called by RCLP at par after
certain dates, have no stated maturity or mandatory
redemption, and pay a cumulative, quarterly dividend at fixed
rates. At any time after ten years from the date of issuance,
the Preferred Units may be exchanged by the holder for
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Preferred Stock") at
an exchange rate of one share for one unit. The Preferred
Units and the related Preferred Stock are not convertible
F-19
Regency Centers, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003
7. Regency's Stockholders' Equity and Partners' Capital (continued)
(a) into common stock of the Company. The net proceeds of these
offerings were used to reduce the balance of the Line. At
December 31, 2003 and 2002 the face value of total Preferred
Units issued was $229 million and $384 million, respectively,
with an average fixed distribution rate of 8.88% and 8.72%,
respectively.
During the third quarter of 2003, the Partnership redeemed $80
million of Series A 8.125% Preferred Units which was funded
from proceeds from the stock offering completed on August 18,
2003 and described below. At the time of the redemption, $1.2
million of costs related to the preferred units were
recognized in the consolidated statements of operations as a
component of minority interest of preferred units. During the
first quarter of 2003, the Partnership redeemed $35 million of
Series C 9% Preferred Units and $40 million of Series E 8.75%
Preferred Units. The redemptions were portions of each series
and the Partnership paid a 1% premium on the face value of the
redeemed units totaling $750,000. At the time of redemption,
the premium and $1.9 million of previously deferred costs
related to the original preferred units' issuance were
recognized in the consolidated statements of operations as a
component of minority interest of preferred units. The
redemption of the Series C and E units was funded from
proceeds from the Line.
Terms and conditions of the Preferred Units outstanding as of
December 31, 2003 are summarized as follows:
Units Issue Amount Distribution Callable Exchangeable
Series Outstanding Price Outstanding Rate by Partnership by Unit holder
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Series B 850,000 100.00 85,000,000 8.750% 09/03/04 09/03/09
Series C 400,000 100.00 40,000,000 9.000% 09/03/04 09/03/09
Series D 500,000 100.00 50,000,000 9.125% 09/29/04 09/29/09
Series E 300,000 100.00 30,000,000 8.750% 05/25/05 05/25/10
Series F 240,000 100.00 24,000,000 8.750% 09/08/05 09/08/10
--------------- ---------------
2,290,000 $ 229,000,000
=============== ===============
(b) On August 18, 2003, we issued 3,600,000 shares of common stock
at $35.96 per share in a public offering.
Until June 24, 2003, Security Capital Group Incorporated owned
34,273,236 shares, representing 56.6% of Regency's outstanding
common stock. On June 24, 2003 Security Capital (1) sold
Regency common stock through (a) an underwritten public
offering and (b) the sale of 4,606,880 shares to Regency at
the public offering price of $32.56 per share and (2) agreed
to sell the balance of its Regency shares pursuant to forward
sales contracts with underwriters. Security Capital settled
all of the forward sales contracts in September and December
2003, and as a result, Security Capital no longer owns any
Regency shares. Security Capital terminated its Stockholders
Agreement with Regency on June 24, 2003 and is now subject to
the same 7% ownership limit in Regency's articles of
incorporation that applies to other shareholders.
F-20
Regency Centers, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003
7. Regency's Stockholders' Equity and Partners' Capital (continued)
(c) During the first quarter of 2003, the holder of the Series 2
preferred stock converted all of its remaining 450,400
preferred shares into common stock at a conversion ratio of
1:1.
(d) On April 3, 2003, the Company received proceeds from a $75
million offering of 3,000,000 depositary shares representing
300,000 shares of Series 3 Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Stock. The depositary shares are not convertible into common
stock of the Company and are redeemable at par upon Regency's
election on or after April 3, 2008, pay a 7.45% annual
dividend and have a liquidation value of $25 per depositary
share. The proceeds from this transaction were contributed to
the Partnership in exchange for 300,000 of Series 3 Preferred
Units issued to and held by Regency with terms exactly the
same as the Series 3 Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.
The proceeds from this offering were used to reduce the Line.
F-21
Regency Centers, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003
8. Earnings per Unit
The following summarizes the calculation of basic and diluted earnings
per unit for the three years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 (in
thousands except per unit data):
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
Numerator:
- ---------
Income from continuing operations $ 143,645 115,104 113,371
Discontinued operations 20,014 31,692 23,325
-------------------- ----------------- ----------------
Net income 163,659 146,796 136,696
Less: Preferred unit distributions and
original issue costs 34,001 33,475 33,475
-------------------- ----------------- ----------------
Net income for common unit holders 129,658 113,321 103,221
Less: preferred stock dividends - 2,276 2,965
-------------------- ----------------- ----------------
Net income for common unit holders - basic
and diluted $ 129,658 111,045 100,256
==================== ================= ================
Denominator:
- -----------
Weighted average common units outstanding
for basic EPU 60,847 59,716 59,058
Incremental units to be issued under common
stock options using the Treasury method 395 378 216
Convertible series 2 preferred stock - 344 -
-------------------- ----------------- ----------------
Weighted average common units outstanding
for diluted EPU 61,242 60,438 59,274
==================== ================= ================
Income per common unit - basic
- ------------------------------
Income from continuing operations $ 1.80 1.32 1.30
Discontinued operations .33 .53 .40
-------------------- ----------------- ----------------
Net income for common unit holders per unit $ 2.13 1.85 1.70
==================== ================= ================
Income per common unit - diluted
- --------------------------------
Income from continuing operations $ 1.79 1.32 1.30
Discontinued operations .33 .52 .39
-------------------- ----------------- ----------------
Net income for common unit holders per unit $ 2.12 1.84 1.69
==================== ================= ================
F-22
Regency Centers, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003
9. Stock Option Plan
Under the Plan, the Company may grant stock options to its officers,
directors and other key employees. Options are granted at fair market
value on the date of grant, vest 25% per year, and expire after ten
years. Stock option grants also receive dividend equivalents for a
specified period of time equal to the Company's dividend yield less the
average dividend yield of the S&P 500 as of the grant date. Dividend
equivalents are funded in Regency common stock, and vest at the same
rate as the options upon which they are based.
The following table reports stock option activity during the
periods indicated:
Weighted
Number of Average
Shares Exercise Price
---------------- --------------------
Outstanding, December 31, 2000 3,590,777 $ 23.50
---------------- --------------------
Granted 591,614 25.01
Forfeited (79,009) 24.11
Exercised (420,420) 21.62
---------------- --------------------
Outstanding, December 31, 2001 3,682,962 23.94
================ ====================
Granted 1,710,093 30.19
Forfeited (177,819) 24.07
Exercised (2,117,376) 23.68
---------------- --------------------
Outstanding, December 31, 2002 3,097,860 27.47
================ ====================
Granted 1,622,143 34.97
Forfeited (7,789) 22.95
Exercised (2,215,924) 27.73
---------------- --------------------
Outstanding, December 31, 2003 2,496,290 $ 32.13
================ ====================
The following table presents information regarding all options
outstanding at December 31, 2003:
Weighted
Average Weighted
Number of Remaining Range of Average
Options Contractual Exercise Exercise
Outstanding Life (in years) Prices Price
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
540,669 5.98 $ 19.81 - 28.70 $ 24.84
934,266 5.55 29.40 - 32.88 31.52
1,021,355 4.45 33.37 - 40.00 36.54
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2,496,290 5.20 $ 19.81 - 40.00 $ 32.13
========================================================================================================
F-23
REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003
9. Stock Option Plan (continued)
The following table presents information regarding options currently
exercisable at December 31, 2003:
Weighted
Number of Range of Average
Options Exercise Exercise
Exercisable Prices Price
------------------------------------------------------------------------
401,805 $ 19.81 - 28.70 $ 24.82
911,766 29.40 - 32.88 31.56
1,021,355 33.37 - 40.00 36.54
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2,334,926 $ 19.81 - 40.00 $ 32.58
========================================================================
10. Operating Leases
The Partnership's properties are leased to tenants under operating
leases with expiration dates extending to the year 2033. Future minimum
rents under noncancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2003,
excluding tenant reimbursements of operating expenses and excluding
additional contingent rentals based on tenants' sales volume are as
follows (in thousands):
Year Ending December 31, Amount
----------------------------------------------------------
2004 $ 268,020
2005 257,485
2006 223,650
2007 190,663
2008 156,164
Thereafter 47,564
---------------
Total $ 1,143,546
===============
The shopping centers' tenant base includes primarily national and
regional supermarkets, drug stores, discount department stores and
other retailers and, consequently, the credit risk is concentrated in
the retail industry. There were no tenants that individually
represented 10% or more of the Partnership's combined minimum rent.
11. Contingencies
The Partnership is involved in litigation on a number of matters and is
subject to certain claims which arise in the normal course of business,
none of which, in the opinion of management, is expected to have a
material adverse effect on the Partnership's consolidated financial
position, results of operations or liquidity.
F-24
REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2003
12. Market and Dividend Information (Unaudited)
The Company's common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange
("NYSE") under the symbol "REG". The Company currently has
approximately 7,000 shareholders. The following table sets forth the
high and low prices and the cash dividends declared on the Company's
common stock by quarter for 2003 and 2002:
2003 2002
------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
Cash Cash
Quarter High Low Dividends High Low Dividends
Ended Price Price Declared Price Price Declared
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
March 31 $ 33.53 30.40 .52 29.50 26.88 .51
June 30 35.72 32.41 .52 31.03 27.82 .51
September 30 36.95 34.09 .52 31.85 25.22 .51
December 31 40.43 35.56 .52 32.40 28.92 .51
13. Summary of Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Presented below is a summary of the consolidated quarterly financial
data for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 (amounts in
thousands, except per unit data):
First Second Third Fourth
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
------- ------- ------- --------
2003:
Revenues as originally reported $ 95,119 94,041 94,847 99,226
Reclassified to discontinued operations (2,711) (1,691) (1,210) -
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Adjusted Revenues $ 92,408 92,350 93,637 99,226
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Net income for common unit holders $ 18,361 26,287 30,519 54,491
============= ============= ============= =============
Net income per unit:
Basic $ .30 .43 .52 .89
============= ============= ============= =============
Diluted $ .30 .42 .51 .89
============= ============= ============= =============
2002:
Revenues as originally reported $ 93,623 93,949 97,320 95,567
Reclassified to discontinued operations (9,862) (7,635) (6,520) (2,781)
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Adjusted Revenues $ 83,761 86,314 90,800 92,786
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Net income for common unit holders $ 25,927 23,572 28,139 35,683
============= ============= ============= =============
Net income per unit:
Basic $ .42 .38 .46 .58
============= ============= ============= =============
Diluted $ .42 .38 .46 .58
============= ============= ============= =============
F-25
The Unit holders of Regency Centers, L.P. and the Board of Directors of
Regency Centers Corporation:
Under date of March 8, 2004, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of
Regency Centers, L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, partners' capital, and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, as
contained in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year 2003. In connection
with our audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also
audited the related financial statement schedule as listed in the accompanying
index on page F-1 of the annual report on Form 10-K for the year 2003. This
financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial
statement schedule based on our audits.
In our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Jacksonville, Florida
March 8, 2004
S-1
REGENCY CENTERS CORPORATION
Combined Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2003
Initial Cost Total Cost
------------------------------ Cost Capitalized ---------------------------------------------
Building & Subsequent to Building & Properties held
Land Improvements Acquisition Land Improvements for Sale
-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- ----------- -
ALDEN BRIDGE 12,936,975 10,145,890 1,020,729 12,936,975 11,166,619 -
ANTHEM MARKETPLACE 6,845,971 13,563,458 (159,999) 6,846,031 13,403,399 -
ARAPAHO VILLAGE 837,148 8,031,688 386,130 837,148 8,417,818 -
ASHBURN FARM MARKET CENTER 9,868,511 5,037,198 (300,146) 9,835,091 4,770,472 -
ASHFORD PLACE 2,803,998 9,943,994 (398,876) 2,583,998 9,765,118 -
AVENTURA SHOPPING CENTER 2,751,094 9,317,790 884,391 2,751,094 10,202,181 -
BECKETT COMMONS 1,625,242 5,844,871 4,817,423 1,625,242 10,662,294 -
BENEVA VILLAGE SHOPS 2,483,547 8,851,199 792,262 2,483,547 9,643,461 -
BERKSHIRE COMMONS 2,294,960 8,151,236 226,119 2,294,960 8,377,355 -
BETHANY PARK PLACE 4,604,877 5,791,750 (243,141) 4,289,877 5,863,609 -
BLOOMINGDALE 3,861,759 14,100,891 542,013 3,861,759 14,642,904 -
BLOSSOM VALLEY 7,803,568 10,320,913 198,069 7,803,568 10,518,982 -
BOLTON PLAZA 2,660,227 6,209,110 1,547,135 2,634,664 7,781,808 -
BOULEVARD CENTER 3,659,040 9,658,227 615,748 3,659,040 10,273,975 -
BOYNTON LAKES PLAZA 2,783,000 10,043,027 1,339,353 2,783,000 11,382,380 -
BRIARCLIFF LA VISTA 694,120 2,462,819 690,587 694,120 3,153,406 -
BRIARCLIFF VILLAGE 4,597,018 16,303,813 8,081,005 4,597,018 24,384,818 -
BUCKHEAD COURT 1,737,569 6,162,941 1,773,619 1,627,569 8,046,560 -
BUCKLEY SQUARE 2,970,000 5,126,240 262,414 2,970,000 5,388,654 -
CAMBRIDGE SQUARE SHOPPING CTR 792,000 2,916,034 1,364,294 792,000 4,280,328 -
CARMEL COMMONS 2,466,200 8,903,187 3,249,881 2,466,200 12,153,068 -
CARRIAGE GATE 740,960 2,494,750 1,802,664 740,960 4,297,414 -
CASA LINDA PLAZA 4,515,000 30,809,330 480,093 4,515,000 31,289,423 -
CHAMPIONS FOREST 2,665,875 8,678,603 162,401 2,665,875 8,841,004 -
CHASEWOOD PLAZA 1,675,000 11,390,727 13,512,276 4,842,921 21,735,082 -
CHERRY GROVE 3,533,146 12,710,297 2,460,235 3,533,146 15,170,532 -
CHERRY PARK MARKET 2,400,000 16,162,934 633,153 2,400,000 16,796,087 -
CHERRY STREET CENTER 2,850,727 4,102,215 (239,290) 2,597,996 4,115,656 -
CHESHIRE STATION 10,181,822 8,442,783 (220,924) 10,106,695 8,296,986 -
CLAYTON VALLEY 14,646,174 9,012,777 - 14,646,174 9,012,777 -
COCHRAN'S CROSSING 13,154,094 10,065,783 2,194,752 13,154,192 12,260,437 -
COOPER STREET 2,078,891 10,682,189 43,933 2,078,891 10,726,122 -
COSTA VERDE 12,740,000 25,261,188 407,252 12,740,000 25,668,440 -
COURTYARD SHOPPING CENTER 1,761,567 4,187,039 (82,028) 5,866,578 - -
CREEKSIDE PHASE II 390,802 1,397,415 678,114 370,527 2,095,804 -
CROMWELL SQUARE 1,771,892 6,285,288 491,826 1,771,892 6,777,114 -
CUMMING 400 2,374,562 8,420,776 694,554 2,374,562 9,115,330 -
DELK SPECTRUM 2,984,577 11,048,896 199,073 2,984,577 11,247,969 -
DIABLO PLAZA 5,300,000 7,535,866 361,511 5,300,000 7,897,377 -
DICKSON TN 675,000 1,568,495 - 675,000 1,568,495
DUNWOODY HALL 1,819,209 6,450,922 5,619,288 2,528,599 11,360,820 -
DUNWOODY VILLAGE 2,326,063 7,216,045 8,093,017 3,335,614 14,299,511 -
EAST POINTE 1,868,120 6,742,983 114,121 1,730,114 6,995,110 -
EAST PORT PLAZA 3,257,023 11,611,363 (1,820,074) 3,257,023 9,791,289 -
ECHELON VILLAGE PLAZA 4,587,273 9,637,201 - 4,587,273 9,637,201 -
EL CAMINO 7,600,000 10,852,428 469,594 7,600,000 11,322,022 -
EL CERRITO PLAZA 2,108,735 - - 2,108,735 - -
EL NORTE PARKWAY PLA 2,833,510 6,332,078 605,074 2,833,510 6,937,152 -
ENCINA GRANDE 5,040,000 10,378,539 380,819 5,040,000 10,759,358 -
FENTON MARKETPLACE 3,020,000 10,368,796 (350,386) 2,615,406 10,423,004 -
FLEMING ISLAND 3,076,701 6,291,505 4,857,003 3,076,701 11,148,508 -
FOLSOM PRAIRIE CITY CROSSING 3,944,033 11,257,933 1,764 3,944,033 11,259,697 -
FORT BEND CENTER 6,965,772 4,401,061 - 6,965,772 4,401,061 -
FRANKFORT CROSSING SHPG CTR 8,325,402 6,066,815 380,492 8,325,402 6,447,307 -
FRIARS MISSION 6,660,000 27,276,992 409,127 6,660,000 27,686,119 -
PRESTONBROOK 4,703,516 10,761,732 (2,735,282) 4,209,248 8,520,718 -
GARDEN SQUARE 2,073,500 7,614,748 528,366 2,136,135 8,080,479 -
GARNER 5,591,099 19,897,197 1,876,272 5,591,099 21,773,469 -
GELSON'S WESTLAKE MARKET PLAZA 2,332,000 8,316,264 14,536 2,332,000 8,330,800 -
GLENWOOD VILLAGE 1,194,198 4,235,476 619,491 1,194,198 4,854,967 -
Total Cost
Net of
Accumulated Accumulated
Total Depreciation Depreciation Mortgages
------------- ------------- --------------- --------------
ALDEN BRIDGE 24,103,594 759,169 23,344,425 10,272,838
ANTHEM MARKETPLACE 20,249,430 115,147 20,134,283 -
ARAPAHO VILLAGE 9,254,966 1,102,102 8,152,864 -
ASHBURN FARM MARKET CENTER 14,605,563 526,494 14,079,069 -
ASHFORD PLACE 12,349,116 2,261,850 10,087,266 4,041,679
AVENTURA SHOPPING CENTER 12,953,275 4,707,474 8,245,801 -
BECKETT COMMONS 12,287,536 1,195,168 11,092,368 -
BENEVA VILLAGE SHOPS 12,127,008 1,291,348 10,835,660 -
BERKSHIRE COMMONS 10,672,315 2,282,054 8,390,261 -
BETHANY PARK PLACE 10,153,486 1,527,005 8,626,481 -
BLOOMINGDALE 18,504,663 2,305,741 16,198,922 -
BLOSSOM VALLEY 18,322,550 1,325,824 16,996,726 -
BOLTON PLAZA 10,416,472 2,177,205 8,239,267 -
BOULEVARD CENTER 13,933,015 1,290,655 12,642,360 -
BOYNTON LAKES PLAZA 14,165,380 1,769,080 12,396,300 -
BRIARCLIFF LA VISTA 3,847,526 971,949 2,875,577 -
BRIARCLIFF VILLAGE 28,981,836 5,199,152 23,782,684 12,307,949
BUCKHEAD COURT 9,674,129 1,764,631 7,909,498 -
BUCKLEY SQUARE 8,358,654 807,449 7,551,205 -
CAMBRIDGE SQUARE SHOPPING CTR 5,072,328 789,370 4,282,958 -
CARMEL COMMONS 14,619,268 1,975,797 12,643,471 -
CARRIAGE GATE 5,038,374 1,655,431 3,382,943 -
CASA LINDA PLAZA 35,804,423 3,908,462 31,895,961 -
CHAMPIONS FOREST 11,506,879 1,109,644 10,397,235 -
CHASEWOOD PLAZA 26,578,003 5,198,822 21,379,181 -
CHERRY GROVE 18,703,678 2,191,860 16,511,818 -
CHERRY PARK MARKET 19,196,087 2,310,999 16,885,088 -
CHERRY STREET CENTER 6,713,652 350,903 6,362,749 5,650,012
CHESHIRE STATION 18,403,681 965,811 17,437,870 -
CLAYTON VALLEY 23,658,951 21,846 23,637,105 -
COCHRAN'S CROSSING 25,414,629 793,136 24,621,493 5,720,439
COOPER STREET 12,805,013 1,324,600 11,480,413 -
COSTA VERDE 38,408,440 4,219,578 34,188,862 -
COURTYARD SHOPPING CENTER 5,866,578 - 5,866,578 -
CREEKSIDE PHASE II 2,466,331 164,663 2,301,668 -
CROMWELL SQUARE 8,549,006 1,469,234 7,079,772 -
CUMMING 400 11,489,892 1,987,723 9,502,169 6,004,419
DELK SPECTRUM 14,232,546 1,748,020 12,484,526 -
DIABLO PLAZA 13,197,377 1,094,584 12,102,793 -
DICKSON TN 2,243,495 164,960 2,078,535
DUNWOODY HALL 13,889,419 2,046,304 11,843,115 -
DUNWOODY VILLAGE 17,635,125 2,281,027 15,354,098 -
EAST POINTE 8,725,224 1,254,813 7,470,411 4,446,115
EAST PORT PLAZA 13,048,312 657,513 12,390,799 -
ECHELON VILLAGE PLAZA 14,224,474 666,836 13,557,638 -
EL CAMINO 18,922,022 1,514,120 17,407,902 -
EL CERRITO PLAZA 2,108,735 - 2,108,735 -
EL NORTE PARKWAY PLA 9,770,662 873,756 8,896,906 -
ENCINA GRANDE 15,799,358 1,382,680 14,416,678 -
FENTON MARKETPLACE 13,038,410 620,868 12,417,542 -
FLEMING ISLAND 14,225,209 1,277,427 12,947,782 2,837,744
FOLSOM PRAIRIE CITY CROSSING 15,203,730 748,343 14,455,387 -
FORT BEND CENTER 11,366,833 323,195 11,043,638 -
FRANKFORT CROSSING SHPG CTR 14,772,709 310,363 14,462,346 -
FRIARS MISSION 34,346,119 3,302,002 31,044,117 16,290,155
PRESTONBROOK 12,729,966 1,492,699 11,237,267 -
GARDEN SQUARE 10,216,614 1,342,361 8,874,253 -
GARNER 27,364,568 2,860,791 24,503,777 -
GELSON'S WESTLAKE MARKET PLAZA 10,662,800 304,368 10,358,432 -
GLENWOOD VILLAGE 6,049,165 1,054,990 4,994,175 -
S-2
Initial Cost Total Cost
------------------------------ Cost Capitalized ---------------------------------------------
Building & Subsequent to Building & Properties held
Land Improvements Acquisition Land Improvements for Sale
-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -----------
GRANDE OAK 5,568,971 5,899,762 (264,580) 5,327,108 5,877,045
KROGER NEW ALBANY CENTER 2,769,901 6,379,103 1,169,985 3,844,152 6,474,837 -
HANCOCK 8,231,581 24,248,620 2,279,142 8,231,581 26,527,762 -
HARPETH VILLAGE FIELDSTONE 2,283,874 5,559,498 3,746,115 2,283,874 9,305,613 -
HERITAGE LAND 12,390,000 - - 12,390,000 - -
HERITAGE PLAZA - 23,675,957 1,618,685 - 25,294,642 -
HERSHEY 6,533 824,232 736 6,533 824,968 -
HILLCREST VILLAGE 1,600,000 1,797,686 70,067 1,600,000 1,867,753 -
HINSDALE 4,217,840 15,039,854 2,032,960 5,729,008 15,561,646 -
HYDE PARK 9,240,000 33,340,181 4,917,860 9,767,813 37,730,228 -
INGLEWOOD PLAZA 1,300,000 1,862,406 161,926 1,300,000 2,024,332 -
KELLER TOWN CENTER 2,293,527 12,239,464 405,218 2,293,527 12,644,682
KERNERSVILLE PLAZA 1,741,562 6,081,020 552,139 1,741,562 6,633,159 -
KINGSDALE SHOPPING CENTER 3,866,500 14,019,614 5,451,850 4,027,515 19,310,449 -
LAKE PINE PLAZA 2,008,110 6,908,986 630,980 2,008,110 7,539,966 -
LAKESHORE 1,617,940 5,371,499 301,762 1,617,940 5,673,261 -
LEETSDALE MARKETPLACE 3,420,000 9,933,701 76,293 3,420,000 10,009,994 -
LITTLETON SQUARE 2,030,000 8,254,964 100,420 2,030,000 8,355,384 -
LLOYD KING CENTER 1,779,180 8,854,803 175,073 1,779,180 9,029,876 -
LOEHMANNS PLAZA GEORGIA 3,981,525 14,117,891 1,044,427 3,981,525 15,162,318 -
LOEHMANNS PLAZA CALIFORNIA 5,420,000 8,679,135 352,600 5,420,000 9,031,735 -
MACARTHUR PARK REPURCHASE 1,929,750 - - 1,929,750 - -
MAINSTREET SQUARE 1,274,027 4,491,897 86,605 1,161,449 4,691,080 -
MARINERS VILLAGE 1,628,000 5,907,835 421,332 1,628,000 6,329,167 -
MARKET AT PRESTON FOREST 4,400,000 10,752,712 54,347 4,400,000 10,807,059 -
MARKET AT ROUND ROCK 2,000,000 9,676,170 132,445 2,000,000 9,808,615 -
MARKETPLACE ST PETE 1,287,000 4,662,740 573,569 1,287,000 5,236,309 -
MARTIN DOWNS VILLAGE CENTER 2,000,000 5,133,495 4,272,854 2,437,664 8,968,685 -
MARTIN DOWNS VILLAGE SHOPPES 700,000 1,207,861 3,519,882 817,135 4,610,608 -
MATLOCK CENTER 2,502,361 3,031,475 - 2,502,361 3,031,475 -
MAXTOWN ROAD (NORTHGATE) 1,753,136 6,244,449 82,566 1,753,136 6,327,015 -
MAYNARD CROSSING 4,066,381 14,083,800 1,312,764 4,066,381 15,396,564 -
MEMORIAL BEND SHOPPING CENTER 3,256,181 11,546,660 2,655,788 3,366,181 14,092,448 -
MILLHOPPER 1,073,390 3,593,523 1,702,035 1,073,390 5,295,558 -
MILLS POINTE 2,000,000 11,919,176 98,833 2,000,000 12,018,009 -
MOCKINGBIRD COMMON 3,000,000 9,675,600 368,327 3,000,000 10,043,927 -
MONUMENT JACKSON CREEK 2,999,482 6,476,151 11,406 2,999,482 6,487,557 -
MORNINGSIDE PLAZA 4,300,000 13,119,929 159,119 4,300,000 13,279,048 -
MURRAYHILL MARKETPLACE 2,600,000 15,753,034 1,933,725 2,669,805 17,616,954 -
NASHBORO 1,824,320 7,167,679 450,712 1,824,320 7,618,391 -
NEWBERRY SQUARE 2,341,460 8,466,651 1,398,340 2,341,460 9,864,991 -
NEWLAND CENTER 12,500,000 12,221,279 (1,983,513) 12,500,000 10,237,766 -
NORTH HILLS 4,900,000 18,972,202 167,220 4,900,000 19,139,422 -
NORTHLAKE VILLAGE I 2,662,000 9,684,740 401,957 2,662,000 10,086,697 -
NORTHVIEW PLAZA 1,956,961 8,694,879 146,414 1,956,961 8,841,293 -
OAKBROOK PLAZA 4,000,000 6,365,704 149,953 4,000,000 6,515,657 -
OCEAN BREEZE 1,250,000 3,341,199 4,006,102 1,527,400 7,069,901 -
OLD ST AUGUSTINE PLAZA 2,047,151 7,355,162 1,565,906 2,107,151 8,861,068 -
PACES FERRY PLAZA 2,811,522 9,967,557 2,225,045 2,811,622 12,192,502 -
PALM TRAILS PLAZA 2,438,996 5,818,523 (157,470) 2,022,454 6,077,595 -
PANTHER CREEK 14,413,781 12,079,254 2,020,132 14,413,781 14,099,386 -
PARK PLACE SHOPPING CENTER 2,231,745 7,974,362 425,997 2,231,745 8,400,359 -
PASEO VILLAGE 2,550,000 7,780,102 517,073 2,550,000 8,297,175 -
PEACHLAND PROMENADE 1,284,562 5,143,564 269,388 1,284,561 5,412,953 -
PEARTREE VILLAGE 5,196,653 8,732,711 10,768,493 5,196,653 19,501,204 -
PIKE CREEK 5,077,406 18,860,183 1,151,836 5,077,406 20,012,019 -
PIMA CROSSING 5,800,000 24,891,690 810,877 5,800,000 25,702,567 -
PINE LAKE VILLAGE 6,300,000 10,522,041 138,688 6,300,000 10,660,729 -
PINE TREE PLAZA 539,000 1,995,927 3,487,695 539,000 5,483,622 -
PLAZA HERMOSA 4,200,000 9,369,630 605,836 4,200,000 9,975,466 -
Total Cost
Net of
Accumulated Accumulated
Total Depreciation Depreciation Mortgages
------------- ------------- --------------- --------------
GRANDE OAK 11,204,153 418,800 10,785,353
KROGER NEW ALBANY CENTER 10,318,989 1,142,713 9,176,276 8,190,517
HANCOCK 34,759,343 3,429,620 31,329,723 -
HARPETH VILLAGE FIELDSTONE 11,589,487 1,382,277 10,207,210 -
HERITAGE LAND 12,390,000 - 12,390,000 -
HERITAGE PLAZA 25,294,642 3,257,969 22,036,673 -
HERSHEY 831,501 62,590 768,911 -
HILLCREST VILLAGE 3,467,753 227,778 3,239,975 -
HINSDALE 21,290,654 2,081,066 19,209,588 -
HYDE PARK 47,498,041 6,203,814 41,294,227 -
INGLEWOOD PLAZA 3,324,332 277,982 3,046,350 -
KELLER TOWN CENTER 14,938,209 1,395,219 13,542,990 -
KERNERSVILLE PLAZA 8,374,721 958,986 7,415,735 4,788,416
KINGSDALE SHOPPING CENTER 23,337,964 3,114,393 20,223,571 -
LAKE PINE PLAZA 9,548,076 1,097,004 8,451,072 5,415,066
LAKESHORE 7,291,201 854,362 6,436,839 3,373,320
LEETSDALE MARKETPLACE 13,429,994 1,241,153 12,188,841 -
LITTLETON SQUARE 10,385,384 1,016,350 9,369,034 -
LLOYD KING CENTER 10,809,056 1,170,719 9,638,337 -
LOEHMANNS PLAZA GEORGIA 19,143,843 3,411,704 15,732,139 -
LOEHMANNS PLAZA CALIFORNIA 14,451,735 1,216,100 13,235,635 -
MACARTHUR PARK REPURCHASE 1,929,750 - 1,929,750 -
MAINSTREET SQUARE 5,852,529 856,658 4,995,871 -
MARINERS VILLAGE 7,957,167 1,186,923 6,770,244 -
MARKET AT PRESTON FOREST 15,207,059 1,294,018 13,913,041 -
MARKET AT ROUND ROCK 11,808,615 1,233,402 10,575,213 6,693,790
MARKETPLACE ST PETE 6,523,309 1,118,243 5,405,066 -
MARTIN DOWNS VILLAGE CENTER 11,406,349 2,774,289 8,632,060 -
MARTIN DOWNS VILLAGE SHOPPES 5,427,743 1,296,594 4,131,149 -
MATLOCK CENTER 5,533,836 271,612 5,262,224 -
MAXTOWN ROAD (NORTHGATE) 8,080,151 974,958 7,105,193 4,855,598
MAYNARD CROSSING 19,462,945 2,236,323 17,226,622 10,746,828
MEMORIAL BEND SHOPPING CENTER 17,458,629 3,331,325 14,127,304 6,883,068
MILLHOPPER 6,368,948 2,122,545 4,246,403 -
MILLS POINTE 14,018,009 1,522,863 12,495,146 -
MOCKINGBIRD COMMON 13,043,927 1,343,234 11,700,693 -
MONUMENT JACKSON CREEK 9,487,039 1,102,487 8,384,552 -
MORNINGSIDE PLAZA 17,579,048 1,702,209 15,876,839 -
MURRAYHILL MARKETPLACE 20,286,759 2,370,667 17,916,092 7,380,510
NASHBORO 9,442,711 916,191 8,526,520 -
NEWBERRY SQUARE 12,206,451 2,996,731 9,209,720 -
NEWLAND CENTER 22,737,766 1,812,616 20,925,150 -
NORTH HILLS 24,039,422 2,336,968 21,702,454 7,375,101
NORTHLAKE VILLAGE I 12,748,697 875,390 11,873,307 6,519,127
NORTHVIEW PLAZA 10,798,254 1,095,139 9,703,115 -
OAKBROOK PLAZA 10,515,657 961,441 9,554,216 -
OCEAN BREEZE 8,597,301 2,010,145 6,587,156 -
OLD ST AUGUSTINE PLAZA 10,968,219 1,943,918 9,024,301 -
PACES FERRY PLAZA 15,004,124 2,622,960 12,381,164 -
PALM TRAILS PLAZA 8,100,049 896,808 7,203,241 -
PANTHER CREEK 28,513,167 903,393 27,609,774 10,411,756
PARK PLACE SHOPPING CENTER 10,632,104 1,095,430 9,536,674 -
PASEO VILLAGE 10,847,175 1,120,664 9,726,511 -
PEACHLAND PROMENADE 6,697,514 1,394,468 5,303,046 -
PEARTREE VILLAGE 24,697,857 3,345,197 21,352,660 11,797,330
PIKE CREEK 25,089,425 2,989,959 22,099,466 -
PIMA CROSSING 31,502,567 3,135,772 28,366,795 -
PINE LAKE VILLAGE 16,960,729 1,302,564 15,658,165 -
PINE TREE PLAZA 6,022,622 789,842 5,232,780 -
PLAZA HERMOSA 14,175,466 1,229,256 12,946,210 -
S-3
Initial Cost Total Cost
------------------------------ Cost Capitalized ---------------------------------------------
Building & Subsequent to Building & Properties held
Land Improvements Acquisition Land Improvements for Sale
-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -----------
POWELL STREET PLAZA 8,247,800 29,279,275 181,172 8,247,800 29,460,447
POWERS FERRY SQUARE 3,607,647 12,790,749 4,414,410 3,607,647 17,205,159 -
POWERS FERRY VILLAGE 1,190,822 4,223,606 287,187 1,190,822 4,510,793 -
PRESTON PARK 6,400,000 46,896,071 2,176,558 6,400,000 49,072,629 -
PRESTONWOOD PARK 8,076,836 14,938,333 141,442 8,076,836 15,079,775 -
QUEENSBOROUGH 1,826,000 6,501,056 (279,019) 1,357,797 6,690,240 -
REGENCY COURT 3,571,337 12,664,014 (548,766) 3,571,337 12,115,248 -
REGENCY SQUARE BRANDON 577,975 18,156,719 10,449,611 4,770,279 24,414,026 -
RIVERMONT STATION 2,887,213 10,445,109 164,150 2,887,213 10,609,259 -
RONA PLAZA 1,500,000 4,356,480 54,336 1,500,000 4,410,816 -
RRC AL ONE INC 546,829 2,187,314 7,550 546,829 2,194,864 -
RUSSELL RIDGE 2,153,214 - 6,675,083 2,215,341 6,612,956 -
SAMMAMISH HIGHLAND 9,300,000 7,553,288 135,310 9,300,000 7,688,598 -
SAN LEANDRO 1,300,000 7,891,091 136,871 1,300,000 8,027,962 -
SANTA ANA DOWNTOWN 4,240,000 7,319,468 819,555 4,240,000 8,139,023 -
SEQUOIA STATION 9,100,000 17,899,819 155,399 9,100,000 18,055,218 -
SHERWOOD CROSSROADS 2,731,038 3,611,502 1,759,565 2,731,038 5,371,067 -
SHERWOOD MARKET CENTER 3,475,000 15,897,972 80,972 3,475,000 15,978,944 -
SHILOH SPRINGS 4,968,236 7,859,381 4,400,095 5,738,582 11,489,130 -
SHOPPES AT MASON 1,576,656 5,357,855 64,540 1,576,656 5,422,395 -
SOMERSET CROSSING 8,744,636 7,819,222 - 8,744,636 7,819,222 -
SOUTH MOUNTAIN 934,179 - - 934,179 - -
SOUTH POINT PLAZA 5,000,000 10,085,995 92,365 5,000,000 10,178,360 -
SOUTHPOINT CROSSING 4,399,303 11,116,491 924,187 4,399,303 12,040,678 -
SOUTHCENTER 1,300,000 12,250,504 210,956 1,300,000 12,461,460 -
SOUTHPARK 3,077,667 9,399,976 153,373 3,077,667 9,553,349 -
ST ANN SQUARE 1,541,883 5,597,282 (1,218,543) 1,541,883 4,378,739 -
STARKE 71,306 1,709,066 4,062 71,306 1,713,128 -
STATLER SQUARE PHASE I 2,227,819 7,479,952 757,814 2,227,819 8,237,766 -
STERLING RIDGE 12,845,777 10,085,096 1,914,222 12,845,777 11,999,318 -
STONEBRIDGE CENTER 1,598,336 3,020,759 7,681 1,598,336 3,028,440 -
STRAWFLOWER VILLAGE 4,060,228 7,232,936 325,930 4,060,228 7,558,866 -
STROH RANCH 4,138,423 7,110,856 955,975 4,279,745 7,925,509 -
SUNNYSIDE 205 1,200,000 8,703,281 228,353 1,200,000 8,931,634 -
TALL OAKS VILLAGE CENTER 1,857,680 6,736,045 42,768 1,857,680 6,778,813 -
TARRANT PARKWAY PLAZA 173,050 - - 173,050 - -
TASSAJARA CROSSING 8,560,000 14,899,929 137,093 8,560,000 15,037,022 -
THE MARKET AT OPITZ CROSSING 9,902,423 8,338,698 778,965 9,902,423 9,117,663 -
THE MARKETPLACE ALEX CITY 1,211,605 4,056,242 (1,067,839) - - 4,200,008
THE PROVINCES 2,224,650 3,943,811 73,897 2,224,650 4,017,708 -
THE SHOPS 3,292,565 2,320,029 821,875 3,292,563 3,141,906 -
THE SHOPS OF SANTA BARBARA 9,476,801 1,322,639 - 9,476,801 1,322,639 -
THOMAS LAKE 6,000,000 10,301,811 180,374 6,000,000 10,482,185 -
TOWN CENTER AT MARTIN DOWNS 1,364,000 4,985,410 102,844 1,364,000 5,088,254 -
TOWN SQUARE 438,302 1,555,481 6,917,112 882,895 8,028,000 -
TROPHY CLUB 2,595,158 10,467,465 140,090 2,595,158 10,607,555 -
TROPHY CLUB OUTPARCELS - - - - - -
TWIN PEAKS 5,200,000 25,119,758 128,311 5,200,000 25,248,069 -
UNION SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER 1,578,654 5,933,889 454,111 1,578,656 6,387,998 -
UNIVERSITY COLLECTION 2,530,000 8,971,597 743,609 2,530,000 9,715,206 -
UNIVERSITY MARKETPLACE 3,250,562 7,044,579 (3,178,167) 3,532,046 3,584,928 -
VALLEY RANCH CENTRE 3,021,181 10,727,623 30,696 3,021,181 10,758,319 -
VENTURA VILLAGE 4,300,000 6,351,012 209,370 4,300,000 6,560,382 -
VILLAGE CENTER 6 3,885,444 10,799,316 971,822 3,885,444 11,771,138 -
VILLAGE IN TRUSSVILLE 973,954 3,260,627 387,731 1,141,677 3,480,635 -
VISTOSO CENTER 196,691 - - 196,691 - -
WALKER CENTER 3,840,000 6,417,522 205,666 3,840,000 6,623,188 -
WATERFORD TOWNE CENTER 5,650,058 6,843,671 1,835,068 6,493,010 7,835,787 -
WELLEBY 1,496,000 5,371,636 1,954,764 1,496,000 7,326,400 -
WELLINGTON TOWN SQUARE 1,914,000 7,197,934 1,106,550 2,026,500 8,191,984 -
Total Cost
Net of
Accumulated Accumulated
Total Depreciation Depreciation Mortgages
------------- ------------- --------------- --------------
POWELL STREET PLAZA 37,708,247 1,506,445 36,201,802 -
POWERS FERRY SQUARE 20,812,806 3,668,578 17,144,228 -
POWERS FERRY VILLAGE 5,701,615 1,008,420 4,693,195 2,729,281
PRESTON PARK 55,472,629 5,928,592 49,544,037 -
PRESTONWOOD PARK 23,156,611 1,751,564 21,405,047 -
QUEENSBOROUGH 8,048,037 1,384,201 6,663,836 -
REGENCY COURT 15,686,585 743,248 14,943,337 -
REGENCY SQUARE BRANDON 29,184,305 9,848,728 19,335,577 -
RIVERMONT STATION 13,496,472 1,759,884 11,736,588 -
RONA PLAZA 5,910,816 533,047 5,377,769 -
RRC AL ONE INC 2,741,693 481,788 2,259,905 -
RUSSELL RIDGE 8,828,297 1,554,574 7,273,723 -
SAMMAMISH HIGHLAND 16,988,598 969,536 16,019,062 -
SAN LEANDRO 9,327,962 1,050,057 8,277,905 -
SANTA ANA DOWNTOWN 12,379,023 1,128,581 11,250,442 -
SEQUOIA STATION 27,155,218 2,207,152 24,948,066 -
SHERWOOD CROSSROADS 8,102,105 240,664 7,861,441 -
SHERWOOD MARKET CENTER 19,453,944 2,053,179 17,400,765 -
SHILOH SPRINGS 17,227,712 3,257,701 13,970,011 -
SHOPPES AT MASON 6,999,051 802,598 6,196,453 3,550,863
SOMERSET CROSSING 16,563,858 68,628 16,495,230 -
SOUTH MOUNTAIN 934,179 - 934,179 -
SOUTH POINT PLAZA 15,178,360 1,267,425 13,910,935 -
SOUTHPOINT CROSSING 16,439,981 1,567,654 14,872,327 -
SOUTHCENTER 13,761,460 1,485,388 12,276,072 -
SOUTHPARK 12,631,016 1,173,506 11,457,510 -
ST ANN SQUARE 5,920,622 1,149,531 4,771,091 4,339,211
STARKE 1,784,434 126,830 1,657,604 -
STATLER SQUARE PHASE I 10,465,585 1,284,502 9,181,083 5,001,575
STERLING RIDGE 24,845,095 775,872 24,069,223 10,708,498
STONEBRIDGE CENTER 4,626,776 198,550 4,428,226 -
STRAWFLOWER VILLAGE 11,619,094 971,475 10,647,619 -
STROH RANCH 12,205,254 1,257,097 10,948,157 -
SUNNYSIDE 205 10,131,634 1,142,148 8,989,486 -
TALL OAKS VILLAGE CENTER 8,636,493 299,572 8,336,921 6,316,571
TARRANT PARKWAY PLAZA 173,050 - 173,050 -
TASSAJARA CROSSING 23,597,022 1,832,954 21,764,068 -
THE MARKET AT OPITZ CROSSING 19,020,086 286,621 18,733,465 12,482,633
THE MARKETPLACE ALEX CITY 4,200,008 - 4,200,008 -
THE PROVINCES 6,242,358 266,811 5,975,547 -
THE SHOPS 6,434,469 34,755 6,399,714 -
THE SHOPS OF SANTA BARBARA 10,799,440 9,431 10,790,009 -
THOMAS LAKE 16,482,185 1,247,885 15,234,300 -
TOWN CENTER AT MARTIN DOWNS 6,452,254 911,861 5,540,393 -
TOWN SQUARE 8,910,895 983,949 7,926,946 -
TROPHY CLUB 13,202,713 983,472 12,219,241 -
TROPHY CLUB OUTPARCELS - 12,466 (12,466) -
TWIN PEAKS 30,448,069 3,134,293 27,313,776 -
UNION SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER 7,966,654 1,273,202 6,693,452 -
UNIVERSITY COLLECTION 12,245,206 1,864,844 10,380,362 -
UNIVERSITY MARKETPLACE 7,116,974 228,284 6,888,690 -
VALLEY RANCH CENTRE 13,779,500 1,334,566 12,444,934 -
VENTURA VILLAGE 10,860,382 805,860 10,054,522 -
VILLAGE CENTER 6 15,656,582 2,551,179 13,105,403 -
VILLAGE IN TRUSSVILLE 4,622,312 1,054,355 3,567,957 -
VISTOSO CENTER 196,691 - 196,691 -
WALKER CENTER 10,463,188 853,170 9,610,018 -
WATERFORD TOWNE CENTER 14,328,797 1,414,506 12,914,291 -
WELLEBY 8,822,400 1,969,307 6,853,093 -
WELLINGTON TOWN SQUARE 10,218,484 1,616,774 8,601,710 -
S-4
Initial Cost Total Cost
------------------------------ Cost Capitalized ---------------------------------------------
Building & Subsequent to Building & Properties held
Land Improvements Acquisition Land Improvements for Sale
-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -----------
WEST END 32,500 1,888,211 1,220 32,500 1,889,431 -
WEST PARK PLAZA 5,840,225 4,991,746 285,957 5,840,225 5,277,703 -
WESTBROOK COMMONS 3,366,000 11,928,393 414,004 3,366,000 12,342,397 -
WESTCHESTER PLAZA 1,857,048 6,456,178 870,436 1,857,048 7,326,614 -
WESTLAKE VILLAGE CENTER 7,042,728 25,744,011 839,535 7,042,729 26,583,545 -
WHITE OAK - DOVER, DE 2,146,550 2,995,295 139,134 2,143,654 3,137,325 -
WILLA SPRINGS SHOPPING CENTER 2,004,438 9,266,550 (215,778) 2,143,784 8,911,426 -
WINDMILLER PLAZA PHASE I 2,620,355 11,190,526 1,138,591 2,620,355 12,329,117 -
WOODCROFT SHOPPING CENTER 1,419,000 5,211,981 546,342 1,419,000 5,758,323 -
WOODMAN VAN NUYS 5,500,000 6,835,246 328,616 5,500,000 7,163,862 -
WOODMEN PLAZA 6,014,033 10,077,698 (82,372) 6,645,284 9,364,075 -
WOODSIDE CENTRAL 3,500,000 8,845,697 87,860 3,500,000 8,933,557 -
WORTHINGTON PARK CENTRE 3,346,203 10,053,858 1,010,093 3,346,203 11,063,951 -
OPERATING BUILD TO SUIT PROPERTIES 11,713,346 6,322,184 - 11,713,346 6,322,184
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
721,456,740 1,740,838,443 194,080,507 738,101,034 1,914,074,648 4,200,008
==========================================================================================
Total Cost
Net of
Accumulated Accumulated
Total Depreciation Depreciation Mortgages
------------- ------------- --------------- --------------
WEST END 1,921,931 202,562 1,719,369 -
WEST PARK PLAZA 11,117,928 652,195 10,465,733 -
WESTBROOK COMMONS 15,708,397 845,742 14,862,655 -
WESTCHESTER PLAZA 9,183,662 1,376,082 7,807,580 5,205,745
WESTLAKE VILLAGE CENTER 33,626,274 3,693,796 29,932,478 -
WHITE OAK - DOVER, DE 5,280,979 244,951 5,036,028 -
WILLA SPRINGS SHOPPING CENTER 11,055,210 779,140 10,276,070 -
WINDMILLER PLAZA PHASE I 14,949,472 1,697,278 13,252,194 -
WOODCROFT SHOPPING CENTER 7,177,323 1,184,100 5,993,223 -
WOODMAN VAN NUYS 12,663,862 908,003 11,755,859 5,063,698
WOODMEN PLAZA 16,009,359 2,092,807 13,916,552 -
WOODSIDE CENTRAL 12,433,557 1,094,484 11,339,073 -
WORTHINGTON PARK CENTRE 14,410,154 1,954,980 12,455,174 -
OPERATING BUILD TO SUIT PROPERTIES 18,035,530 2,008,298 16,027,232 -
-------------------------------------------------------------
2,656,375,690 285,664,875 2,370,710,815 217,399,852
=============================================================
S-5
REGENCY CENTERS CORPORATION
Combined Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2003
Depreciation and amortization of the Company's investments in buildings and
improvements reflected in the statements of operations are calculated over the
estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
Buildings and improvements - up to 40 years
The aggregate cost for Federal income tax purposes was approximately $2.6
billion at December 31, 2003.
The changes in total real estate assets for the periods ended December 31, 2003,
2002 and 2001:
2003 2002 2001
---------------- ----------------- ----------------
Balance, beginning of period $ 2,692,503,225 2,673,164,289 2,561,795,627
Developed or acquired properties 238,963,468 402,035,886 187,979,361
Sale of properties (287,547,490) (397,202,939) (88,410,037)
Provision for loss on operating and development properties (1,968,520) (4,369,480) (1,595,136)
Reclass accumulated depreciation to adjust building basis 439,854 (7,021,279) (1,627,178)
Reclass accumulated depreciation related to properties
held for sale (2,536,766) (3,408,624) (815,400)
Reclass accumulated depreciation related to properties
held for sale recharacterized in 2002 to properties to be
held and used - 10,771,769 -
Improvements 16,521,919 18,533,603 15,837,052
---------------- ----------------- ----------------
Balance, end of period $ 2,656,375,690 2,692,503,225 2,673,164,289
================ ================= ================
The changes in accumulated depreciation for the periods ended December 31, 2003,
2002 and 2001:
2003 2002 2001
---------------- ----------------- ----------------
Balance, beginning of period $ 244,595,928 202,325,324 147,053,900
Prior depreciation Midland JV's transferred in - 2,433,269
Sale of properties (23,707,664) (23,593,423) (5,052,051)
Reclass accumulated depreciation
to adjust building basis 439,854 (7,021,279) (1,627,178)
Reclass accumulated depreciation related to properties
held for sale (2,536,766) (3,408,624) (815,400)
Reclass accumulated depreciation related to properties
held for sale recharacterized in 2002 to properties to be
held and used - 10,771,769 -
Depreciation expense for period 66,873,523 65,522,161 60,332,784
---------------- ----------------- ----------------
Balance, end of period $ 285,664,875 244,595,928 202,325,324
================ ================= ================
S-6