U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
[X] |
Quarterly report Pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange act of 1934 |
[ ] |
Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange act of 1934 |
Commission file number 0-23881
COWLITZ BANCORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Washington |
91-1529841 |
927 Commerce Ave., Longview, Washington 98632
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(360) 423-9800
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act)
Yes[ ] No [X]
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common Stock, no par value on July 31, 2003: 3,868,432 shares
1
COWLITZ BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE |
||
Part I |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
Item 1. |
Financial Statements |
|
Consolidated Statements of Condition - |
3 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Income - |
4 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity - |
5 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - |
6 |
|
7-14 |
||
Item 2. |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition |
15-27 |
Item 3. |
27 |
|
Item 4. |
28 |
|
Part II |
OTHER INFORMATION |
|
Item 1. |
29 |
|
Item 2. |
29 |
|
Item 3. |
29 |
|
Item 4. |
29 |
|
Item 5. |
29 |
|
Item 6. |
29 |
|
30 |
||
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
31-33 |
Forward-Looking Statements
Management's discussion and the information in this document and the accompanying financial statements contain forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies and expectations of the Company, are generally identifiable by words such as "expect", "believe", "intend", "anticipate", "estimate" or similar expressions, and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those stated. Examples of such risks and uncertainties that could have a material adverse effect on the operations and future prospects of the Company, and could render actual results different from those expressed in the forward-looking statements, include, without limitation: changes in general economic conditions, competition for financial services in the market area of the Company, the level of demand for loan s, quality of the loan and investment portfolio, deposit flows, legislative and regulatory initiatives, and monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government affecting interest rates. The reader is advised that this list of risks is not exhaustive and should not be construed as any prediction by the Company as to which risks would cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
2
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
COWLITZ BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES | ||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION | ||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||
(unaudited) | (audited) | |||||
June 30, | December 31, | |||||
ASSETS | 2003 | 2002 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ 62,403 | $ 43,691 | ||||
Investment securities: | ||||||
Investments available-for-sale (at fair value, cost of $28,451 and | ||||||
$32,759 at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively) | 28,845 | 33,276 | ||||
Investments held-to-maturity (at amortized cost, fair value of $1,042 and | ||||||
$362 at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively) | 1,026 | 357 | ||||
Total investment securities | 29,871 | 33,633 | ||||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost | 2,314 | 2,346 | ||||
Loans held-for-sale | 27,017 | 63,645 | ||||
Loans, net of deferred loan fees | 168,948 | 194,506 | ||||
Allowance for loan losses | (5,867) | (6,150) | ||||
Total loans, net | 163,081 | 188,356 | ||||
Premises and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $4,850 and | ||||||
$4,586 at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively | 4,289 | 4,377 | ||||
Goodwill | 2,352 | 2,352 | ||||
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $1,601 and | ||||||
$1,468 at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively | 369 | 502 | ||||
Accrued interest receivable and other assets | 6,588 | 6,262 | ||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $ 298,284 | $ 345,164 | ||||
LIABILITIES | ||||||
Deposits: | ||||||
Non-interest-bearing demand | $ 44,584 | $ 46,539 | ||||
Savings and interest-bearing demand | 109,421 | 108,961 | ||||
Certificates of deposit | 99,343 | 134,620 | ||||
Total deposits | 253,348 | 290,120 | ||||
Short-term borrowings | 1,975 | 2,525 | ||||
Long-term borrowings | 8,549 | 18,706 | ||||
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities | 2,048 | 2,550 | ||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES | 265,920 | 313,901 | ||||
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||
Preferred stock, no par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares | ||||||
issued and outstanding at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 | - | - | ||||
Common stock, no par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized with | ||||||
3,861,432 and 3,818,272 shares issued and outstanding at | ||||||
June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively | 17,746 | 17,491 | ||||
Additional paid-in capital | 1,538 | 1,538 | ||||
Retained earnings | 12,822 | 11,894 | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes | 258 | 340 | ||||
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | 32,364 | 31,263 | ||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | $ 298,284 | $ 345,164 | ||||
See accompanying notes | ||||||
3
COWLITZ BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES | ||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME | ||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended |
||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | December 31 | ||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | 2002 | ||||||||||||
(unaudited) | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | (audited) | |||||||||
INTEREST INCOME | ||||||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans | $ 3,779 | $ 4,891 | $ 8,012 | $ 9,821 | $ 19,725 | |||||||||
Interest on taxable investment securities | 204 | 516 | 454 | 883 | 1,604 | |||||||||
Interest on non-taxable investment securities | 6 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 15 | |||||||||
Other interest and dividend income | 162 | 148 | 335 | 408 | 695 | |||||||||
Total interest income | 4,151 | 5,560 | 8,810 | 11,119 | 22,039 | |||||||||
INTEREST EXPENSE | ||||||||||||||
Savings and interest-bearing demand | 315 | 441 | 639 | 837 | 1,714 | |||||||||
Certificates of deposit | 861 | 1,543 | 1,864 | 3,435 | 5,920 | |||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 5 | 14 | 12 | 24 | 44 | |||||||||
Long-term borrowings | 172 | 234 | 369 | 471 | 933 | |||||||||
Total interest expense | 1,353 | 2,232 | 2,884 | 4,767 | 8,611 | |||||||||
Net interest income before provision for loan losses | 2,798 | 3,328 | 5,926 | 6,352 | 13,428 | |||||||||
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES | 43 | 355 | 566 | 655 | 2,783 | |||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 2,755 | 2,973 | 5,360 | 5,697 | 10,645 | |||||||||
NON-INTEREST INCOME | ||||||||||||||
Gains on loans sold | 1,247 | 998 | 2,996 | 2,172 | 5,655 | |||||||||
Mortgage brokerage fees | 651 | 706 | 1,494 | 1,311 | 3,221 | |||||||||
Escrow fees | 324 | 193 | 661 | 415 | 1,140 | |||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts | 238 | 171 | 484 | 349 | 752 | |||||||||
Credit card income | 143 | 132 | 296 | 257 | 547 | |||||||||
Fiduciary income | 80 | 71 | 170 | 142 | 275 | |||||||||
Net gains on sales of investment securities available-for-sale | - | 39 | - | 39 | 183 | |||||||||
Gain on sale of repossessed assets | 4 | 19 | 37 | 21 | (113) | |||||||||
Other income | 23 | 45 | 66 | 106 | 233 | |||||||||
Total non-interest income | 2,710 | 2,374 | 6,204 | 4,812 | 11,893 | |||||||||
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE | ||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits | 2,465 | 2,604 | 5,089 | 5,018 | 10,722 | |||||||||
Net occupancy and equipment expense | 565 | 588 | 1,212 | 1,168 | 2,260 | |||||||||
Professional fees | 479 | 261 | 946 | 536 | 1,491 | |||||||||
Business taxes | 98 | 137 | 231 | 299 | 606 | |||||||||
FDIC assessment | 133 | 143 | 271 | 290 | 557 | |||||||||
Credit card expense | 151 | 131 | 306 | 247 | 527 | |||||||||
Data processing and communications | 108 | 152 | 237 | 253 | 512 | |||||||||
Loan expense | 240 | 130 | 353 | 208 | 503 | |||||||||
Postage and freight | 128 | 116 | 231 | 240 | 484 | |||||||||
Travel and education | 66 | 36 | 137 | 86 | 401 | |||||||||
Stationery and supplies | 54 | 92 | 115 | 163 | 337 | |||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 67 | 67 | 133 | 133 | 265 | |||||||||
Cost relating to other real estate owned | 74 | 47 | 101 | 131 | 260 | |||||||||
Other expenses | 391 | 311 | 762 | 584 | 1,272 | |||||||||
Total non-interest expense | 5,019 | 4,815 | 10,124 | 9,356 | 20,197 | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes | 446 | 532 | 1,440 | 1,153 | 2,341 | |||||||||
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES | 161 | (184) | 512 | 59 | 339 | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations | 285 | 716 | 928 | 1,094 | 2,002 | |||||||||
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS: | ||||||||||||||
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS, NET OF TAX | - | - | - | 6 | 6 | |||||||||
GAIN ON DISPOSAL, NET OF TAX | - | - | - | 279 | 279 | |||||||||
Income from discontinued operations | - | - | - | 285 | 285 | |||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | 285 | 716 | 928 | 1,379 | 2,287 | |||||||||
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF A CHANGE IN | ||||||||||||||
ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE, NET OF TAX | - | - | - | (791) | (791) | |||||||||
Net income | $ 285 | $ 716 | $ 928 | $ 588 | $ 1,496 | |||||||||
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK | ||||||||||||||
Continuing operations | $ 0.07 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.24 | $ 0.29 | $ 0.53 | |||||||||
Discontinued operations | - | - | - | 0.08 | 0.08 | |||||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | - | - | - | (0.21) | (0.21) | |||||||||
Net income per basic share of common stock | $ 0.07 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.24 | $ 0.16 | $ 0.40 | |||||||||
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK | ||||||||||||||
Continuing operations | $ 0.07 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.24 | $ 0.28 | $ 0.53 | |||||||||
Discontinued operations | - | - | - | 0.08 | 0.07 | |||||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | - | - | - | (0.21) | (0.21) | |||||||||
Net income per diluted share of common stock | $ 0.07 | $ 0.19 | $ 0.24 | $ 0.15 | $ 0.39 | |||||||||
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING - BASIC | 3,835,261 | 3,738,245 | 3,827,386 | 3,718,989 | 3,757,608 | |||||||||
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING - DILUTED | 3,959,677 | 3,855,688 | 3,936,297 | 3,794,697 | 3,851,196 | |||||||||
See accompanying notes |
4
COWLITZ BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES | |||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | |||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||
Common stock | Paid-in | Retained | Comprehensive | Shareholders' | Comprehensive | ||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Earnings | Income (Loss) | Equity | Income (Loss) | |||||||||||
BALANCE, December 31, 2001 | 3,692,560 | $ 16,802 | $ 1,538 | $ 10,398 | $ 10 | $ 28,748 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive income: | |||||||||||||||||
Net income | - | - | - | 1,496 | - | 1,496 | $ 1,496 | ||||||||||
Net changes in unrealized gains on | |||||||||||||||||
investments available-for-sale, | |||||||||||||||||
net of deferred taxes of $176 | - | - | - | - | 330 | 330 | 330 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ 1,826
|
||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from the exercise of | |||||||||||||||||
stock options | 87,600 | 479 | - | - | - | 479 | |||||||||||
Issuance of common stock in | |||||||||||||||||
connection with acquisition | 38,112 | 210 | - | - | - | 210 | |||||||||||
BALANCE, December 31, 2002 | 3,818,272 | 17,491 | 1,538 | 11,894 | 340 | 31,263 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive income: | |||||||||||||||||
Net income | - | - | - | 928 | - | 928 | $ 928 | ||||||||||
Net changes in unrealized gains on | |||||||||||||||||
investments available-for-sale, | |||||||||||||||||
net of deferred taxes of $42 | - | - | - | - | (82) | (82) | (82) | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ 846
|
||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from the exercise of | |||||||||||||||||
stock options | 43,160 | 255 | - | - | - | 255 | |||||||||||
BALANCE, June 30, 2003 | 3,861,432 | $ 17,746 | $ 1,538 | $ 12,822 | $ 258 | $ 32,364 | |||||||||||
(unaudited) | |||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes | |||||||||||||||||
5
COWLITZ BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES | ||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | ||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
Net income from continuing operations, net of a change in accounting principle in 2001 | $ 928 | $ 303 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income from continuing operations to net cash from operating activities: | ||||||||
Deferred tax provision (benefit) | 52 | (348) | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 416 | 475 | ||||||
Impairment of goodwill | - | 1,208 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses | 566 | 655 | ||||||
Net amortization of investment security premiums and accretion of discounts | 116 | 146 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends | (68) | (119) | ||||||
Net gain on sales of repossessed assets | (37) | (21) | ||||||
Gain on the sale of investment securities available-for-sale | - | (39) | ||||||
Loss on the sale of premises and equipment | 10 | 8 | ||||||
Gains on loans sold | (2,996) | (2,172) | ||||||
Origination of loans held-for-sale | (238,339) | (178,406) | ||||||
Proceeds from loan sales | 277,963 | 197,341 | ||||||
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable and other assets | 376 | (67) | ||||||
Decrease in accrued interest payable and other liabilities | (502) | (2,361) | ||||||
Net cash from continuing operations | 38,485 | 16,603 | ||||||
Net income from discontinued operations | - | 285 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income from discontinued operations to net cash from operating activities: | ||||||||
Gain on sale of discontinued operations | - | (423) | ||||||
Increase in accrued interest receivable and other assets | - | (16) | ||||||
Increase in accrued interest payable and other liabilities | - | 120 | ||||||
Net cash from discontinued operations | - | (34) | ||||||
Net cash from operating activities | 38,485 | 16,569 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets | 872 | 320 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities held-to-maturity | - | 2,599 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities and sales of investment securities available-for-sale | 12,309 | 14,678 | ||||||
Purchases of investment securities: | ||||||||
Held-to-maturity | (671) | (559) | ||||||
Available-for-sale | (8,117) | (34,893) | ||||||
Proceeds from redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock | 100 | - | ||||||
Net decrease in loans - continuing operations | 23,164 | 4,269 | ||||||
Purchases of premises and equipment | (210) | (24) | ||||||
Proceeds from the sale of premise and equipment | 4 | 13 | ||||||
Net proceeds from the sale of discontinued operations | - | 3,345 | ||||||
Net cash from investment activities | 27,451 | (10,252) | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in demand, savings, and interest-bearing demand deposits | (1,495) | 8,484 | ||||||
Net decrease in certificates of deposit | (35,277) | (43,852) | ||||||
Net (decrease) increase in short-term borrowings | (550) | 1,350 | ||||||
Repayment of long-term borrowings | (10,157) | (150) | ||||||
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options | 255 | 320 | ||||||
Net cash from financing activities | (47,224) | (33,848) | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 18,712 | (27,531) | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period | 43,691 | 50,177 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period | $ 62,403 | $ 22,646 | ||||||
See accompanying notes | ||||||||
6
COWLITZ BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands, except number of shares and per share amounts)
Cowlitz Bancorporation (the "Company") was organized in 1991 under Washington law to become the holding company for Cowlitz Bank (the "Bank"), a Washington state chartered bank that commenced operations in 1978. The principal executive offices of the Company are located in Longview, Washington. The Company operates as a community bank under the names Cowlitz Bank with four branches in Cowlitz County and southwest Washington; Northern Bank of Commerce ("NBOC") in Portland, Oregon with one full service and one limited service branch; and Bay Bank operating one branch in Bellevue, Washington and a loan production office in Vancouver, Washington, which opened in May of 2003. Cowlitz Bank also provides mortgage banking services through its Bay Mortgage and Bay Escrow divisions with offices in Seattle, Bellevue, Longview, and Vancouver, Washington.
The Company offers or makes available a broad range of financial services to its customers, primarily small and medium-sized businesses, professionals, and retail customers. The Bank's commercial and personal banking services include commercial and real estate lending, consumer lending, mortgage origination and trust services. The Company also provided asset-based lending services to companies throughout the western United States through its subsidiary, Business Finance Corporation ("BFC"), from 1998 until its sale and discontinuance of operations in February 2002. The Company's goals are to offer exceptional customer service and to invest in the markets it serves through its business practices and community service.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
The interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, including normal recurring accruals necessary for fair presentation of results of operations for the interim periods included herein have been made. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of results to be anticipated for the year ending December 31, 2003.
For purposes of presentation in the statements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks and federal funds sold. Federal funds sold generally mature the day following purchase.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include the allowance for loan losses and the carrying value of the Company's goodwill. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
7
COWLITZ BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands, except number of shares and per share amounts)
The following table reconciles the denominator of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations:
Three Months Ended | ||||
June 30, | ||||
2003 | 2002 | |||
Weighted-average shares - basic | 3,835,261 | 3,738,245 | ||
Effect of assumed conversion of stock options | 124,416 | 117,443 | ||
Weighted-average shares - diluted | 3,959,677 | 3,855,688 | ||
Six Months Ended | ||||
June 30, | ||||
2003 | 2002 | |||
Weighted-average shares - basic | 3,827,386 | 3,718,989 | ||
Effect of assumed conversion of stock options | 108,911 | 75,708 | ||
Weighted-average shares - diluted | 3,936,297 | 3,794,697 |
Options to purchase 276,066 shares of common stock with exercise prices ranging from $7.50 to $12.00, with an average price of $11.07, were outstanding at June 30, 2003 but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options' exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares. These options expire from 2008-2012.
In April 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement No. 149, "Amendment of Statement No. 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." This Statement amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities under FASB Statement No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." The Company's management does not expect that the application of the provisions of this statement will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In June 2003, FASB issued SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity." This statement establishes standards regarding classification and measurement of certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires financial instruments within the scope of this statement to be classified as liabilities (or an asset in some circumstances). Many of these financial instruments were previously classified as equity. This statement is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. For financial instruments created before the issuance date of this statement and still existing at the beginning of the interim period of adoption, transition is achieved by reporting the cumulative effect of a change in an accounting principle by initially measuring the financial inst
ruments at fair value. The Company's management does not expect that the application of the provisions of this statement will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," requires disclosure about stock-based compensation arrangements regardless of the method used to account for them. As permitted by SFAS No. 123, the Company has decided to apply the accounting provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, and therefore discloses the difference between compensation cost included in net income and the related cost measured by the fair value-based method defined by SFAS No. 123, including tax effects, that would have been recognized in the statement of income if the fair value method had been used. Under APB Opinion No. 25, no compensation cost has been recognized for the Company's stock option plans. Had compensation cost for these plans been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123 and recognized over the vesting period, the Company's net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share would have been reduced to the following pro forma amounts:
8
COWLITZ BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands, except number of shares and per share amounts)
Three Months Ended Three Months Ended Six Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 June 30, 2002 June 30, 2003 June 30, 2002 As Pro As Pro As Pro As Pro Reported Forma Reported Forma Reported Forma Reported Forma Net income $ 285 $ 225 $ 716 $ 647 $ 928 $ 718 $ 588 $ 462 Basic earnings (loss) per share: Continuing operations $ 0.07 $ 0.06 $ 0.19 $ 0.17 $ 0.24 $ 0.19 $ 0.29 $ 0.25 Discontinued operations - - - - - - 0.08 0.08 Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle - - - - - - (0.21) (0.21) $ 0.07 $ 0.06 $ 0.19 $ 0.17 $ 0.24 $ 0.19 $ 0.16 $ 0.12 Diluted earnings (loss) per share: Continuing operations $ 0.07 $ 0.06 $ 0.19 $ 0.17 $ 0.24 $ 0.18 $ 0.28 $ 0.25 Discontinued operations - - - - - - 0.08 0.08 Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle - - - - - - (0.21) (0.21) $ 0.07 $ 0.06 $ 0.19 $ 0.17 $ 0.24 $ 0.18 $ 0.15 $ 0.12
The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions used for June 30, 2003 and 2002.
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2003 2002 2003 2002 Dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Expected life (years) 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 Expected volatility 52.11% 52.02% 52.11% 52.02% Risk-free rate 2.98% 4.25% 2.98% 4.25%
9
COWLITZ BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands, except number of shares and per share amounts)
For the Company, comprehensive income includes net income reported on the statements of income and changes in the fair value of its available-for-sale investments reported as a component of shareholders' equity.
The components of comprehensive income (loss) for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) arising during the period, net of tax | $ (7) | $ 458 | $ (82) | $ 330 | ||||||
Less reclassification adjustment for net realized losses | ||||||||||
on securities available-for-sale included in net | ||||||||||
income during the period, net of tax | - | 26 | - | 26 | ||||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) included in | ||||||||||
other comprehensive income | $ (7) | $ 432 | $ (82) | $ 304 | ||||||
The Company is principally engaged in community banking activities through its branches and corporate offices. Community banking activities include accepting deposits, providing loans and lines of credit to local individuals, businesses and governmental entities, investing in securities and money market instruments, and holding or managing assets in a fiduciary agency capacity on behalf of its customers and their beneficiaries. The mortgage banking segment, Bay Mortgage, specializes in all facets of residential lending including FHA and VA loans, construction loans and bridge loans. Prior to the sale of Business Finance Corporation in the first quarter of 2002, the Company provided asset-based financing to companies throughout the western United States.
The community banking and mortgage banking activities are monitored and reported by Company management as separate operating segments. The asset-based financing activity, conducted through Business Finance Corporation, was previously considered to be an additional segment of business. However, in the following table for the six months ended June 30, 2002, this former segment of business is reported as discontinued operations.
The accounting policies for the Company's segment information provided in the following tables are the same as those described for the Company in the summary of significant accounting policies footnote included in the Company's 2002 annual report, except that some operating expenses and the results of discontinued operations are not allocated to segments.
10
COWLITZ BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands, except number of shares and per share amounts)
Summarized financial information for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, concerning the Company's reportable segments is shown in the following tables:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2003 Mortgage Holding Banking Banking Company Intersegment Consolidated (unaudited) Interest income $ 3,796 $ 752 $ 7 $ (404) $ 4,151 Interest expense 1,334 366 57 (404) 1,353 Net interest income 2,462 386 (50) - 2,798 Provision for loan losses 100 - (57) - 43 Non-interest income 495 2,215 - - 2,710 Non-interest expense 2,759 2,126 134 - 5,019 Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes 98 475 (127) - 446 Provision (benefit) for income taxes 38 164 (41) - 161 Net income (loss) $ 60 $ 311 $ (86) $ - $ 285 Depreciation and amortization $ 173 $ 27 $ - $ - $ 200 Three Months Ended June 30, 2002 Mortgage Holding Banking Banking Company Intersegment Consolidated (unaudited) Interest income $ 5,176 $ 699 $ 3 $ (318) $ 5,560 Interest expense 2,204 288 58 (318) 2,232 Net interest income 2,972 411 (55) - 3,328 Provision for loan losses 400 - (45) - 355 Non-interest income 451 1,923 - - 2,374 Non-interest expense 2,765 1,977 73 - 4,815 Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes 258 357 (83) - 532 Provision (benefit) for income taxes 99 123 (406) - (184) Net income $ 159 $ 234 $ 323 $ - $ 716 Depreciation and amortization $ 197 $ 28 $ - $ - $ 225
11
COWLITZ BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands, except number of shares and per share amounts)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 Mortgage Holding Banking Banking Company Intersegment Consolidated (unaudited) Interest income $ 8,078 $ 1,696 $ 15 $ (979) $ 8,810 Interest expense 2,859 891 113 (979) 2,884 Net interest income 5,219 805 (98) - 5,926 Provision for loan losses (651) - 1,217 - 566 Non-interest income 1,060 5,144 - - 6,204 Non-interest expense 5,494 4,433 197 - 10,124 Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes 1,436 1,516 (1,512) - 1,440 Provision (benefit) for income taxes 506 523 (517) - 512 Net income (loss) $ 930 $ 993 $ (995) $ - $ 928 Depreciation and amortization $ 361 $ 55 $ - $ - $ 416 Total assets $ 293,673 $ 41,864 $ 35,168 $ (72,421) $ 298,284
The segment information for the six months ended June 30, 2003 includes a reclassification between the Banking and Holding Company segments of $901,000 for the provision for loan losses. This reclassification does not affect the consolidated results of operation or earnings per share, but has resulted in a benefit to the Banking segment presentation for the six months ended June 30, 2003.
12
COWLITZ BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands, except number of shares and per share amounts)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2002 Mortgage
BankingHolding
CompanyIntersegment Consolidated Banking (unaudited) Interest income $ 10,476 $ 1,443 $ 6 $ (806) $ 11,119 Interest expense 4,719 713 117 (782) 4,767 Net interest income 5,757 730 (111) (24) 6,352 Provision for loan losses 700 - (45) - 655 Non-interest income 852 3,960 - - 4,812 Non-interest expense 5,399 3,699 258 - 9,356 Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes 510 991 (324) (24) 1,153 Provision (benefit) for income taxes 197 342 (480) - 59 Net income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle 313 649 156 (24) 1,094 Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle - (791) - - (791) Net income (loss) from continuing operations $ 313 $ (142) $ 156 $ (24) 303 Net income from discontinued operations 285 Net income $ 588 Depreciation and amortization $ 418 $ 57 $ - $ - $ 475 Total assets $ 331,272 $ 40,299 $ 32,901 $ (69,222) $ 335,250
13
COWLITZ BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands, except number of shares and per share amounts)
In February 2002, the Company sold substantially all assets of Business Finance Corporation (BFC) for a pre-tax gain of $423,000, or $279,000 after tax. The sale represents the disposal of a business segment and the gain from disposition has been recorded within discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30, 2002. The following table summarizes the sale transaction:
Net finance receivables sold $ 2,800 Allowance for finance receivable (289) Other assets sold 119 Total assets sold $ 2,630Loan payable to Company $ 2,800 Other liabilities assumed 212 Cash paid by purchaser 41 Total liabilities assumed $ 3,053 Pre-tax gain on sale $ 423
During December 2002 and January 2003, the Bank closed 11 limited service branches in the greater Portland, Oregon market that were doing business as Northern Bank of Commerce. This decision was partially due to relatively high interest rates paid on low deposit volumes at these branches. At June 30, 2003, the deposit volume associated with these former locations was $12.7 million of which $9.4 million consisted of certificates of deposit. This compares to $15.2 million of total deposits and $11.1 million in certificates at March 31, 2003. At December 31, 2002, these locations had an aggregate deposit balance of $17.3 million of which $11.9 million were certificates of deposit. Although the Bank will attempt to retain the lower cost deposits by moving the deposit relationships to the main NBOC branch in Portland, management expects additional deposit accounts to be withdrawn and closed.
14
Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
During the second quarter of 2003 the Company had net income of $285,000, or $0.07 per diluted share, compared to net income of $716,000, or $0.19 per diluted share, in the second quarter of 2002. Income from continuing operations before the provision for income taxes reported for the second quarter 2003 was $86,000 lower than the amount reported for the second quarter 2002. The primary reason for the higher net income during the second quarter 2002 was an income tax benefit of $375,000 recognized during that period. The tax benefit resulted from a reduction in the Company's deferred tax valuation allowance, which was recorded in the first quarter of 2002 in connection with the sale of BFC.
Comparing the quarter ended June 30, 2003 to the quarter ended June 30, 2002, the provision for loan losses was $312,000 lower and non-interest income was $336,000 higher. These bolstered net income, but were offset by a reduction of net interest income of $530,000 and an increase of $204,000 in non-interest expenses.
Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
During the six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company recorded net income of $928,000, or $0.24 per diluted share, compared to net income of $588,000, or $0.15 per diluted share, for the comparable period of 2002. Net income from continuing operations prior to a change in accounting principle and net income from discontinued operations (both discussed below) for the first two quarters of 2002 was $1.1 million or $0.28 per diluted share. For the first half of 2003, the Company's revenues (net interest income before provision for loan losses plus non-interest income) were $12.1 million, an increase of $900,000 from revenues of $11.2 million during the same period in 2002. Non-interest expenses were $10.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to $9.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002.
During the first quarter of 2002, the Company recorded an impairment charge to the carrying amount of its goodwill from the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" (SFAS No. 142). The impairment charge was recognized as a result of a transitional goodwill impairment test required by SFAS No. 142. The charge totaled $791,000 or $0.21 per diluted share, net of tax of $417,000. The Company does not currently anticipate additional adjustments or charges related to SFAS No. 142. Net income from continuing and discontinued operations for the first six months of 2002, prior to this charge, was $1.4 million or $0.36 per diluted share.
Net income for the first half of 2002 also included income from the discontinued operations of Business Finance Corporation (BFC) of $285,000, or $0.08 per diluted share, net of tax. Included in discontinued operations is a gain, net of tax, of $279,000 from the sale of BFC during the first quarter of 2002. The Company originally purchased BFC to diversify its business and to offer asset-based lending services to its customers. However, due to a poor return on investment, and the desire to focus resources on the core banking business, the BFC subsidiary was sold in February 2002.
Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2002 also includes an income tax benefit of $375,000 or $0.10 per diluted share. The deferred tax benefit resulted from a reduction in the Company's valuation allowance held against certain deferred tax assets, which were recorded in the first quarter of 2002 in connection with the sale of BFC. Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes was $1.4 million and $1.2 million for the first six months of 2003 and 2002, respectively. The increase from period to period is primarily due to an increase in mortgage lending activity and the associated non-interest income generated. Non-interest income was $1.4 million higher during the first half of 2003 compared to the first half of 2002. This increase in non-interest income was offset by a decrease of $337,000 in net interest income after the provision for loan losses and an increase of $768,000 in non-interest expenses when comparing the six-month periods of 2003 and 2002.
Financial Condition as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002
At June 30, 2003, total assets were $298.3 million and total liabilities were $265.9 million. Total assets have decreased $46.9 million or 13.6% from $345.2 million at December 31, 2002 and liabilities have decreased $48.0 million or 15.3% from $313.9 million at December 31, 2002.
15
The decline in total assets is due to a reduction in volume of both loans and loans held-for-sale since December 31, 2002. At June 30, 2003, loans were $168.9 million compared to $194.5 million at December 31, 2002, a decline of $25.6 million or 13.2%. This reduction in loan volume is a combination of charged-off balances of approximately $900,000 and balances transferred to repossessed assets of approximately $1.5 million with loan pay-downs and pay-offs accounting for the remaining decline. Loans held-for-sale have decreased $36.6 million or 57.5% from $63.6 million at December 31, 2002 to $27.0 million at June 30, 2003. During the first half of 2003 loan pay-offs were relatively high because, under the current low rate environment, many borrowers sought to renew their loans at lower rates. While the Bank makes every effort to be competitive for and retain favorable client relationships, management also sees this time as an opportunity to encourage some customers representing weaker cred its to seek alternative lending relationships. In other circumstances, the Bank decided not to match rates on loans that management deemed unprofitable.
Reductions in the volumes of brokered and other higher rate certificates of deposit and borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) account for the majority of the decline in total liabilities from December 31, 2002 to June 30, 2003. At June 30, 2003, the Company had $19.9 million in brokered deposits or 7.9% of the $253.3 million total deposits compared to $29.7 million or 10.2% of $290.1 million of total deposits at December 31, 2002. Approximately $9.7 million of these brokered deposits are scheduled to mature during the remainder of 2003. Approximately $13.0 million in public fund certificates matured during the first six months of 2003 and were not renewed and an additional $5.8 million is expected to mature during July 2003. A reduction of $10.1 million in FHLB borrowings during the first two quarters of 2003 has reduced the Company's long-term borrowings to $8.5 million at June 30, 2003 compared to $18.7 million at December 31, 2002. Because the reduction in loans and loans he ld-for-sale has generated some excess cash and liquidity, management's current practice is to not renew brokered and public fund certificates or long-term borrowings as they mature. If future circumstances change to warrant increasing liquidity or cash balances, the Company retains the ability to access these funding sources.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company's most critical accounting policy is related to the allowance for loan losses. The Company utilizes both quantitative and qualitative considerations in establishing an allowance for loan losses believed to be appropriate as of each reporting date. Quantitative factors include:
Qualitative factors include assessments of the types and quality of the loans within the loan portfolio as well as current local, regional, and national economic considerations. Changes in the above factors could have a significant affect on the determination of the allowance for loan losses. Management performs a full analysis, no less often than quarterly, to ensure that changes in estimated loan loss levels are adjusted on a timely basis. For further discussion of this significant management estimate, see "Allowance for Loan Losses."
Another critical accounting policy for the Company is that related to the carrying value of goodwill. During the first quarter of 2002, the Company recorded an impairment charge to the carrying amount of its goodwill related to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" (SFAS No. 142). The impairment charge was recognized as a result of a transitional goodwill impairment test required by SFAS No. 142. The Company adopted a market valuation approach in assessing goodwill impairment and will measure the carrying value similarly at least annually under these accounting rules. Ongoing impairment analysis of the fair value of the remaining goodwill will involve a substantial amount of judgment, as will establishing and monitoring estimated amounts and lives of other intangible assets. Also as required upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, the Company ceased amortization of goodwill on January 1, 2002.
Analysis of Net Interest Income
For financial institutions, the primary component of earnings is net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income, principally from loans and the investment securities portfolio, and interest expense, principally on customer deposits and borrowings. Changes in net interest income result from changes in "volume," "spread," and "margin." Volume refers to the dollar level of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Spread refers to the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin is the ratio of net interest income to total interest-earning assets and is influenced by the level and relative mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
16
Three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
The following table presents interest income and expense and the resulting yields earned, rates paid, interest rate spread, and net interest margin for the periods indicated.
Three Months Ended | ||||||
(unaudited) | June 30, | Increase | ||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2003 | 2002 | (Decrease) | Change | ||
Interest Income (1) | $ 4,153 | $ 5,562 | $ (1,409) | -25.3% | ||
Interest Expense | 1,353 | 2,232 | (879) | -39.4% | ||
Net Interest Income | $ 2,800 | $ 3,330 | $ (530) | -15.9% | ||
Average Interest-Earning Assets | $ 279,600 | $ 318,741 | $ (39,141) | -12.3% | ||
Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities | $ 218,511 | $ 266,848 | $ (48,337) | -18.1% | ||
Average Yields Earned (2) | 5.94% | 6.98% | -1.04% | |||
Average Rates Paid (2) | 2.48% | 3.35% | -0.87% | |||
Net Interest Spread (2) | 3.46% | 3.63% | -0.17% | |||
Net Interest Margin (2) | 4.01% | 4.18% | -0.17% | |||
(1) Interest earned on non-taxable securities has been computed on a 34% tax equivalent basis | ||||||
(2) Ratios for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 have been annualized |
Comparing the quarter ended June 30, 2003 to the quarter ended June 30, 2002, interest income declined $1.4 million, interest expense declined $879,000, and net interest income decreased $530,000. Because yields earned declined more than rates paid, both the net interest spread and the net interest margin for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 were slightly lower than during the quarter ended June 30, 2002.
The overall tax-equivalent average earning asset yield was 5.94% for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 compared to 6.98% for the quarter ended June 30, 2002. Contributing to the decline in interest rates was a 50 basis points reduction in the national federal funds rate and the Company's prime rate in November 2002. These interest rates declined another 25 basis points in June 2003. Earning assets averaged $279.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003, a decline of $39.1 million compared to $318.7 million for the same period of 2002. A change in asset mix from loans, loans held-for-sale, and investment securities to lower rate interest-earning deposits has also contributed to a lower overall yield comparing the periods. During the three months ended June 30, 2002, average loans and loans held-for-sale were 75.2% of total average interest-earning assets, and average interest-earning deposits was 6.1% of the total. During the same period of 2003, average loans and loans held-for-sale declined to 71.6% of average interest-earning assets, while average interest-earning deposits increased to 14.2% of the total. Total average investment securities, including both available-for-sale and held-to-maturity, have also declined contributing to the increase in interest-earning deposits. Average investment securities declined from 16.5% to 11.8% of the total average interest-earning assets for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased to 2.48% for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 from 3.35% for the same period of 2002. Average interest-bearing liabilities decreased $48.3 million from $266.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $218.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. The majority of the decline in average interest-bearing liabilities is due to a reduction in brokered and public fund certificates of deposit, and FHLB borrowings. At June 30, 2003 the volume of brokered certificates was $19.9 million compared to $32.2 million at June 30, 2002. In addition, public fund certificates of deposit declined by $12.0 million comparing the two quarters. During the second quarter of 2003 the average volume of other borrowed money decreased to $9.6 million from $18.9 million during the second quarter of 2002.
17
Six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
The following table presents interest income and expense and the resulting yields earned, rates paid, interest rate spread, and net interest margin for the periods indicated.
Six Months Ended | ||||||
(unaudited) | June 30, | Increase | ||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2003 | 2002 | (Decrease) | Change | ||
Interest Income (1) | $ 8,813 | $ 11,251 | $ (2,438) | -21.7% | ||
Interest Expense | 2,884 | 4,767 | (1,883) | -39.5% | ||
Net Interest Income | $ 5,929 | $ 6,484 | $ (555) | -8.6% | ||
Average Interest-Earning Assets | $ 291,975 | $ 327,977 | $ (36,002) | -11.0% | ||
Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities | $ 230,274 | $ 275,512 | $ (45,238) | -16.4% | ||
Average Yields Earned (2) | 6.04% | 6.86% | -0.82% | |||
Average Rates Paid (2) | 2.50% | 3.46% | -0.96% | |||
Net Interest Spread (2) | 3.54% | 3.40% | 0.14% | |||
Net Interest Margin (2) | 4.06% | 3.95% | 0.11% | |||
(1) Interest earned on non-taxable securities has been computed on a 34% tax equivalent basis | ||||||
(2) Ratios for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 have been annualized |
Comparing the six months ended June 30, 2003 to the six months ended June 30, 2002, interest income declined $2.4 million, interest expense declined $1.9 million, and net interest income decreased $555,000. The average yields earned and average rates paid both declined nearly the same amount, keeping the net interest spread and net interest margin relatively unchanged when comparing the six-month periods.
The overall tax-equivalent average earning asset yield was 6.04% for the first six months of 2003 compared to 6.86% for the same period of 2002. Contributing to the decline in interest rates was a 50 basis points reduction in the national federal funds rate and the Company's prime rate in November 2002. These interest rates declined another 25 basis points in June 2003. Earning assets averaged $292.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003, a decline of $36.0 million compared to $328.0 million for the same period of 2002. A change in asset mix from loans, loans held-for-sale, and investment securities to lower rate interest-earning deposits has also contributed to a lower overall yield comparing the periods. During the six months ended June 30, 2002, average loans, loans held-for-sale, and securities were 87.7% of total average interest-earning assets, and average interest-earning deposits was 10.5% of the total. During the same period of 2003, average loans, loans held-for-sale, an d investment securities declined to 83.7% of average interest-earning assets, while average interest-earning deposits increased to 13.9% of the total.
The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased to 2.50% for the six months ended June 30, 2003 from 3.46% for the same period of 2002. Average interest-bearing liabilities decreased $45.2 million from $275.5 million for the first half of 2002 to $230.3 million for the first half of 2003. The majority of the decline in average interest-bearing liabilities is due to a reduction in brokered and public fund certificates of deposit, and FHLB borrowings as discussed above. During the six months ended June 30, 2003, the average volume of other borrowed money decreased to $12.8 million from $18.9 million during the same period of 2002.
Provision for Loan Losses
The amount of the allowance for loan losses is analyzed by management on a regular basis to ensure that it is adequate to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the reporting date. When a provision for loan losses is recorded, the amount is based on past charge-off experience, a careful analysis of the current loan portfolio, the level of non-performing and impaired loans, evaluation of future economic trends in the Company's market area, and other factors relevant to the loan portfolio. The quarterly provision recorded as an increase to the allowance for loan losses is based upon estimates of probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The loss amount actually realized for these loans can vary significantly from the estimated amounts. See the "Allowance for Loan Losses" discussion for additional detail.
18
Three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
The Company's provision for loan losses was $43,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 and $355,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2002. Charge-offs, net of recoveries, were $146,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2003 compared to net charge-offs of $447,000 for the three months ended June 31, 2002 and $2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The provision for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 includes $100,000 of expense recorded at the Banking segment, and a recovery of $57,000 received on a charged-off loan at the Holding Company. Because the Holding Company has no loans to reserve against, any recovery of previously charged-off loans is credited to the allowance, but immediately reversed against the provision for loan losses.
Six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
The Company's provision for loan losses was $566,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and $655,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002. Charge-offs, net of recoveries, were $849,000 for the first half of 2003 compared to net charge-offs of $838,000 for the same period of 2002 and $2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Future loan loss provisions will be based on Management's quarterly adequacy analysis of the allowance for loan losses. Management anticipates a possible reduction in future provisions if the economy strengthens and bolsters the Company's borrowers' ability to repay or increases underlying collateral values of the loans.
Non-Interest Income
Three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
Non-interest income consists of the following components:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||
(unaudited) | June 30, | June 30, | |||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||
Service charge on deposit accounts | $ 238 | $ 171 | $ 484 | $ 349 | |||
Gains on loans sold | 1,247 | 998 | 2,996 | 2,172 | |||
Mortgage brokerage fees | 651 | 706 | 1,494 | 1,311 | |||
Fiduciary income | 80 | 71 | 170 | 142 | |||
Escrow fees | 324 | 193 | 661 | 415 | |||
Credit Card income | 143 | 132 | 296 | 257 | |||
ATM income | 13 | 37 | 26 | 65 | |||
Safe deposit box fees | 2 | 3 | 27 | 27 | |||
Gain on sale of repossessed assets | 4 | 19 | 37 | 21 | |||
Gain on sale of available-for-sale securities | - | 39 | - | 39 | |||
Other miscellaneous fees and income | 8 | 5 | 13 | 14 | |||
Total non-interest income | $ 2,710 | $ 2,374 | $ 6,204 | $ 4,812 | |||
Non-interest income was $2.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, an increase of $336,000 from $2.4 million for the same period of 2002. For the six-month periods ended June 30 2003 and 2002, non-interest income was $6.2 million and $4.8 million, respectively, an increase of $1.4 million. Non-interest income generated by the mortgage banking segment continued to account for the majority of the total non-interest income for the periods. Gains on loans sold, mortgage brokerage fees, and escrow fees were $2.2 million, which accounted for 81.5% of the total non-interest income for the second quarter of 2003, and were $1.9 million or 79.2% for the same period of 2002. These income categories were $5.2 million, or 83.9% of the total non-interest income for the first two quarters of 2003, and were $3.9 million or 81.3% of the total non-interest income for the same period of 2002.
19
Non-Interest Expense
Three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
Non-interest expense consists of the following components:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||
(unaudited) | June 30, | June 30, | |||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||
Salaries and employee benefits | $ 2,465 | $ 2,604 | $ 5,089 | $ 5,018 | |||
Net occupancy and equipment | 565 | 588 | 1,212 | 1,168 | |||
Amortization of intangible assets | 67 | 67 | 133 | 133 | |||
Net cost of operation of other real estate owned | 74 | 47 | 101 | 131 | |||
Business taxes | 98 | 137 | 231 | 299 | |||
Data processing and communications | 108 | 152 | 237 | 253 | |||
Stationery and supplies | 54 | 92 | 115 | 163 | |||
Credit card expense | 151 | 131 | 306 | 247 | |||
Travel and education | 66 | 36 | 137 | 86 | |||
Loan expense | 240 | 130 | 353 | 208 | |||
Advertising | 39 | 43 | 56 | 82 | |||
Professional fees | 479 | 261 | 946 | 536 | |||
Postage and freight | 128 | 116 | 231 | 240 | |||
FDIC insurance | 133 | 143 | 271 | 290 | |||
Other miscellaneous expenses | 352 | 268 | 706 | 502 | |||
Total non-interest expense | $ 5,019 | $ 4,815 | $ 10,124 | $ 9,356 |
Total non-interest expenses increased $204,000 to $5.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 compared to $4.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2002. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, total non-interest expenses increased $768,000 to $10.1 million compared to $9.4 million for the same period of 2002.
Salary expenses have declined by $139,000 comparing the second quarter of 2003 to the second quarter of 2002. Salary expenses have increased slightly comparing the first six months of 2003 to the first six months of 2002. At June 30, 2003, the Company had 170 full-time equivalent employees compared to 195 at June 30, 2002. Although the number of employees has declined significantly, commission expenses at Bay Mortgage have increased from period to period due to a higher volume of mortgage loans originated and sold, keeping the total salary expenses relatively high. During the second quarter of 2003, Bay Mortgage originated $113.3 million of mortgage loans, an increase of $27.8 million from $85.5 million originated during the second quarter of 2002. During the first six months of 2003, Bay Mortgage originated $238.3 million of mortgage loans, an increase of $59.9 million from $178.4 million originated during the first six months of 2002. Also contributing to keeping the salary expense relat ively higher is ordinary annual wage increases for many existing employees, generally ranging from three to six percent per year.
Net occupancy and equipment expenses consist of depreciation on premises and equipment, lease costs, parking, maintenance and repair expenses, utilities and related expenses. The Company's net occupancy expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 was $565,000 or 3.9% lower than $588,000 for the same period of 2002. The lease cost savings related to a closure of a branch of Bay Mortgage early in 2003 contributed to lower overall occupancy expenses when comparing the quarters. The Company's net occupancy expense for the six months ended June 30, 2003 was $1.2 million, which is unchanged from the same period of 2002.
20
Although the FDIC insurance premium rate remains unchanged at $.17 per $100 of domestic deposits when comparing the quarters and six months periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, the total expense has declined due to a reduction in deposit volume. The FDIC sets deposit insurance premiums based upon the risks a particular bank or savings association poses to the deposit insurance funds. This system bases an institution's risk category partly upon whether the institution is well capitalized, adequately capitalized or less than adequately capitalized. Each insured depository institution is also assigned to one of three "supervisory" categories based on reviews by regulators, statistical analysis of financial statements and other relevant information. An institution's assessment rate depends upon the capital category and supervisory category to which it is assigned. Annual assessment rates currently range from zero per $100 of domestic deposits for the highest rated institution to $0.27 per $10 0 of domestic deposits for an institution in the lowest category. Under legislation enacted in 1996 to recapitalize the Savings Association Insurance Fund, the FDIC is authorized to collect assessments against insured deposits to be paid to the Financing Corporation ("FICO") to service FICO debt incurred in the 1980's. The current FICO assessment rate for BIF insured deposits is $0.0162 per $100 of deposits per year. Any increase in deposit insurance of FICO assessments could have an adverse effect on Cowlitz Bank's earnings.
Professional fees include exam and audit expenses, consulting and legal fees, and other professional fees. These expenses were $479,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2003 compared to $261,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002. These expenses were $946,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to $536,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 Approximately $150,000 of the $218,000 increase comparing the three month periods and $128,000 of the $409,000 increase comparing the six month periods, is legal expenditures for advice and opinions related to contracts, regulatory documentation, and various other administrative issues, and collection and repossession of loans. Another $117,000 and $362,000 of the remaining increases for the three and six month periods, respectively, are attributable to consultation to establish or improve internal controls and procedures to improve regulatory reporting, and for employee placement services. Declines in accounting expenses of $74 ,000 and $100,000 comparing the three and six month periods, respectively have somewhat offset the increases in legal and consulting expenses.
Loan expenses for both the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2003 include approximately $130,000 resulting from the write-off of prepaid mortgage loan expenses. These expenses, including appraisals and credit reports, were prepaid on behalf of potential borrowers when they applied for a mortgage loan. In some cases, these expenses were not collected from the borrower at the close of the loan, or the loan never closed. A recent review of prepaid mortgage expenses indicated these items should be charged to expense.
Other miscellaneous expenses were higher during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2003 when compared to the same periods of 2002 primarily due to higher temporary help costs. Contracted temporary employees have been utilized during 2003 to assist management on various special projects and to help during the transition of new management. The Company expects to see a reduction in these expenses during the remainder of 2003.
Income Taxes
Three months ended June 30, 20003 and 2002
During the second quarter of 2003 the provision for income taxes was $161,000 compared to an income tax benefit of $184,000 for the second quarter of 2002. The second quarter of 2002 includes a $375,000 tax benefit related to the reversal of a deferred tax valuation allowance resulting from the sale of BFC in the first quarter of 2002. The sale of BFC generated a capital loss for tax purposes and a deferred tax asset on the Company's books, which was fully reserved as of the end of the first quarter of 2002. During the second quarter of 2002, the Company identified certain strategies for federal income tax purposes that resulted in the reversal of the valuation allowance with a corresponding income tax benefit of $375,000 for the period. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2002, excluding the $375,000 benefit, was 35.9% compared to 36.1% for the three months ended June 30 2003.
Six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
During the first two quarters of 2003 the provision for income taxes was $512,000 compared to $59,000 for the first two quarters of 2002. These provisions resulted in an effective tax rate of 35.6% and 5.1% for the same periods of 2003 and 2002, respectively. The effective tax rate for the year to date 2002, excluding the $375,000 tax benefit discussed above, was 37.6%. The results from discontinued operations and the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principles disclosed on the consolidated statements of income are net of income taxes.
21
Loans
Total loans outstanding were $168.9 million and $194.5 million at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. Loan commitments such as home equity and other lines of credit, unused available credit on credit cards, and letters of credit, were $31.4 million at June 30, 2003 and $39.9 million at December 31, 2002. In addition, the Company had $27.0 million of loans held-for-sale at June 30, 2003 compared to $63.6 million at December 31, 2002. During the first six months of 2003, the Company funded $238.3 million of loans to be sold into the secondary market, and delivered $278.0 million to the market. This compares to $178.4 million funded and $197.3 million delivered during the first six months of 2002.
The following table presents the composition of the Company's loan portfolio at the dates indicated:
(unaudited) | June 30, 2003 | December 31, 2002 | ||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | ||||
Commercial | $ 36,565 | 21.57% | $ 42,200 | 21.62% | ||||
Real estate construction | 26,306 | 15.52% | 37,229 | 19.07% | ||||
Real estate commercial | 76,615 | 45.19% | 82,763 | 42.41% | ||||
Real estate mortgage | 25,631 | 15.12% | 28,370 | 14.53% | ||||
Consumer and other | 4,410 | 2.60% | 4,626 | 2.37% | ||||
169,527 | 100.00% | 195,188 | 100.00% | |||||
Deferred loan fees | (579) | (682) | ||||||
Total loans | 168,948 | 194,506 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (5,867) | (6,150) | ||||||
Total loan, net | $ 163,081 | $ 188,356 | ||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses represents management's estimate of potential losses that have occurred as of the date of the financial statements. The loan portfolio is regularly reviewed to evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. In determining the level of the allowance, the Company evaluates the amount necessary for specific non-performing loans and estimates losses inherent in other loans. An important element in determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is an analysis of loans by loan rating categories. At a loan's inception, management evaluates the credit risk by using a grading system. This grading system currently includes ten levels of risk. Risk gradings range from "1" for the strongest credits to "10" for the weakest. A "10" rated loan would normally represent a loss, and all loans rated 7-10 collectively comprise the Company's "watch list". The specific grades from 7-10 are "special mention", "substandard", "doubtful", and "loss", respectivel y. When indicators such as operating losses, collateral impairment or delinquency problems show that a credit may have weakened, the credit will be downgraded as appropriate. Similarly, as borrowers bring loans current, show improved cash flows, or improve the collateral position of a loan, the credits may be upgraded. Management reviews all credits periodically for changes in such factors. The result is an allowance with four components, specific reserves, a general allowance, special reserves, and unallocated reserves.
22
Management establishes the allowance for loan losses by analyzing the volume and mix of the existing loan portfolio, in addition to other factors. Management analyzes:
Management also attempts to ensure that the overall allowance appropriately reflects a margin for the imprecision necessarily inherent in estimates of expected loan losses.
The quarterly analysis of all components of the allowance is the principal method relied upon by management to ensure that changes in estimated loan loss levels are adjusted on a timely basis. The inclusion of historical loss factors in the process of determining the general component of the allowance also acts as a self-correcting mechanism of management's estimation process, as loss experience more remote in time is replaced by more recent experience. In its analysis of the specific and the general components of the allowance, management also considers regulatory guidance in addition to the Company's own experience. There have been no changes to the Company's allowance for loan losses related to changes in methods or assumptions since December 31, 2002. Any adjustments or changes in the elements and components of the allowance since year-end are primarily the result of loan quality assessments and variations in total loan volumes.
Loans and other extensions of credit deemed uncollectible are charged to the allowance. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. Actual losses may vary from current estimates and the amount of the provision may be either greater than or less than actual net charge-offs. The related provision for loan losses that is charged to income is the amount necessary to adjust the allowance to the level determined through the above process.
Management's evaluation of the loan portfolio resulted in total allowances for loan losses of $5.9 million and $6.2 million at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively, a decline of approximately $300,000. The allowance, as a percentage of total loans, increased from 3.2% at year-end 2002 to 3.5% at June 30, 2003. Management believes the allowance for loan losses at both June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 is adequate to absorb potential losses.
In accordance with the Company's methodology for assessing the appropriate allowance for loan losses, the general portion of the allowance was $3.4 million at June 30, 2003 compared to $4.1 million at December 31, 2002. The general allowance has decreased from period to period as the volume of total loans has declined, and as loans on the Company's watch list requiring a higher reserve allocation have been upgraded to levels requiring a smaller reserve percentage. During the first six months of 2003, the volume of loans on the Company's watch list has decreased by approximately $10.1 million.
At June 30, 2003, approximately $1.6 million of the allowance for loan losses was allocated based on an estimate of the amount that was necessary to provide for potential losses related to specific loans, unchanged from $1.6 million at December 31, 2002.
The combined special and unallocated allowance was $1.1 million and $460,000 at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. Although the volume of loans requiring specific or general reserves has declined, the combined special and unallocated allowance has increased to reflect imprecision in the valuation process and the continuing weakness in local economies.
23
The allowance for loan losses is based upon estimates of probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The amount actually observed for these losses can vary significantly from the estimated amounts. The following table shows the Company's loan loss performance for the periods indicated.
(unaudited)
|
Six Months Ended | Year Ended | |||||
(balances exclude amounts from discontinued operations) | June 30, | December 31, | |||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2003 | 2002 | 2002 | ||||
Loans outstanding at end of period, net of deferred fees (1) | $ 168,948 | $ 226,441 | $ 194,506 | ||||
Average loans outstanding during the period | $ 180,352 | $ 227,051 | $ 219,231 | ||||
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period | $ 6,150 | $ 5,710 | $ 5,710 | ||||
Loans charged off: | |||||||
Commercial | 644 | 842 | 2,111 | ||||
Real Estate | 201 | 128 | 415 | ||||
Consumer | 71 | 2 | 7 | ||||
Credit Cards | 24 | 75 | 83 | ||||
Total loans charged-off | 940 | 1,047 | 2,616 | ||||
Recoveries: | |||||||
Commercial | 65 | 75 | 99 | ||||
Real Estate | 20 | 116 | 156 | ||||
Consumer | 3 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Credit Cards | 3 | 15 | 17 | ||||
Total recoveries | 91 | 207 | 273 | ||||
Provision for loan losses | 566 | 655 | 2,783 | ||||
Allowance for loan losses, end of period | $ 5,867 | $ 5,525 | $ 6,150 | ||||
Net loans charged-off during the period | 849 | 840 | 2,343 | ||||
Ratio of net loans charged-off to average loans outstanding | 0.47% | 0.37% | 1.07% | ||||
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to loans at end of period | 3.47% | 2.44% | 3.16% | ||||
(1) Excludes loans held-for-sale | |||||||
Impaired Loans
The Company, during its normal loan review procedures, considers a loan to be impaired when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. A loan is not considered to be impaired during a period of minimal delay (less than 90 days) unless available information strongly suggests impairment. The Company measures impaired loans based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at the loan's observable market price or the fair market value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Impaired loans are charged to the allowance when management believes that, after considering economic and business conditions, collection efforts, and collateral position, the borrower's financial condition indicates that collection of principal is not probable.
Generally, no interest is accrued on loans when factors indicate collection of interest is doubtful or when principal or interest payments become 90 days past due, unless collection of principal and interest are anticipated within a reasonable period of time and the loans are well secured. For such loans, previously accrued but uncollected interest is charged against current earnings, and income is only recognized to the extent payments are subsequently received and collection of the remaining recorded principal balance is considered probable.
24
Non-Performing Assets
Non-performing loans include all loans greater than 90 days past due with respect to either principal or interest, and all loans to which the accrual of interest has been suspended. These loans, combined with repossessed real estate and other repossessed assets, are collectively considered to be non-performing assets. The following table presents information on all non-performing assets:
(unaudited) | June 30, | December 31, | |||
(dollars in thousands) | 2003 | 2002 | |||
Loans on non-accrual status | $ 3,616 | $ 5,097 | |||
Loans past due greater than 90 days but not on non-accrual status | 149 | 982 | |||
Other real estate owned | 2,016 | 1,304 | |||
Other repossessed assets | 2 | 4 | |||
Total non-performing assets | $ 5,783 | $ 7,387 | |||
Total assets | $ 298,284 | $ 345,164 | |||
Percentage of non-performing assets to total assets | 1.94% | 2.14% | |||
At June 30, 2003 non-performing assets were $5.8 million or 1.94% of total assets compared to $7.4 million or 2.14% of total assets at December 31, 2002. A reduction in total non-accrual loans of $1.5 million accounts for the majority of the decrease, and is related to loans for $1.8 million to a real estate development company whose loans were brought current and taken off of non-accrual status. Approximately $2.8 million of the $3.6 million of non-accrual loans at June 30, 2003 are primarily secured by real estate and the remainder consists of commercial and consumer loans with varying collateral. Any losses on non-accrual loans that are considered probable have been estimated by management in its routine assessment of the allowance for loan losses as discussed above.
The Company is actively working on identifying and reducing the level of non-performing assets, and has undertaken a more aggressive approach relating to the collection and ultimate reduction of non-performing assets. As these impaired loans are brought current, charged-off, or the repossessed collateral sold, the level of non-performing assets is expected to decrease.
Other real estate owned increased to $2.0 million at June 30, 2003 compared to $1.3 million at December 31, 2002. During the first six months of 2003, six properties with a total cost basis of $822,000 were sold, while nine properties were repossessed with a total asset value of $1.5 million.
Liquidity
Liquidity represents the ability to meet deposit withdrawals and fund loan demand, while retaining the flexibility to take advantage of business opportunities. The Company's primary sources of funds have been customer and brokered deposits, loan payments, sales of investments, sales of loans or other assets, borrowings, and the use of the federal funds market.
As of June 30, 2003, approximately $13.1 million of the securities portfolio is scheduled to mature within one year, and another $4.0 million is callable within one year. The maturities of mortgage-backed securities, which are not due at a single maturity date, have been allocated over maturity groupings based on the expected maturity of the underlying collateral. Mortgage-backed securities may mature earlier than their stated contractual maturities because of accelerated principal repayments of the underlying loans.
Historically the Company has utilized borrowings from the FHLB as an important source of funding for its growth. Currently, the Company is permitted to borrow, for periods of up to one year, amounts equal to a discounted value of assets, including certain loans and securities, physically delivered to the FHLB. The Company's current advances from the FHLB have original maturities ranging from 4 through 15 years and at June 30, 2003, bear interest at rates ranging from 6.11% to 8.62%. The remaining maturities of the Company's FHLB advances range from 9 months through 6 1/2 years. Because the Company currently has excess liquidity, during the first six months of 2003, $10.1 million of advances matured and were not renewed. At June 30, 2003, $5.7 million in advances were outstanding from the FHLB compared to $15.8 million at December 31, 2002.
25
Currently, the Company's excess liquidity is related to changes in the origination volume of loans held-for-sale. In order to take advantage of income generated from high volumes of mortgage lending during 2002 and 2001, the Company utilized brokered certificates of deposit to help fund the mortgage lending growth. As loans held-for-sale and other loan volumes have declined, the excess funds generated have been deposited in the Company's cash account with the FHLB. To offset this increase in cash and the resulting increase in liquidity, high rate brokered certificates of deposit have not been renewed as they mature. At June 30, 2003, brokered certificates of deposit have decreased to $19.9 million or 7.9% of total deposits compared to $29.7 million or 10.2% of total deposits at December 31, 2002 and to $56.7 million or 18.0% of total deposits at December 31, 2001. An additional $13.0 million of public funds certificates of deposit matured during the first quarter of 2003, and have not been renewed. During the first six months 2003, total loans have decreased $25.6 million and loans held-for-sale have declined $36.6 million, offsetting the reduction in deposits and keeping the cash balance and liquidity higher.
Regulatory Capital
The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal and state banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory - and possibly additional discretionary - actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on Cowlitz Bancorporation's and Cowlitz Bank's financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, Cowlitz Bancorporation and Cowlitz Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Cowlitz Bancorporation's and Cowlitz Bank's capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
The following table presents selected capital information for the Company and the Bank as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002:
To Be Well-Capitalized | |||||||||||||||
Under Prompt | |||||||||||||||
For Capital Adequacy | Corrective Action | ||||||||||||||
Actual | Purposes | Provision | |||||||||||||
Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | ||||||||||
June 30, 2003 | |||||||||||||||
Total risk-based capital: | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated | $ 31,613 | 15.56% | $ 16,255 | >8.00% | $ 20,319 | >10.00% | |||||||||
Bank | $ 33,000 | 16.26% | $ 16,240 | >8.00% | $ 20,300 | >10.00% | |||||||||
Tier 1 risk-based capital: | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated | $ 29,032 | 14.29% | $ 8,127 | >4.00% | $ 12,191 | >6.00% | |||||||||
Bank | $ 30,421 | 14.99% | $ 8,120 | >4.00% | $ 12,180 | >6.00% | |||||||||
Tier 1 (leverage) capital: | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated | $ 29,032 | 9.87% | $ 11,765 | >4.00% | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
Bank | $ 30,421 | 10.37% | $ 11,740 | >4.00% | $ 14,674 | >5.00% | |||||||||
December 31, 2002 | |||||||||||||||
Total risk-based capital: | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated | $ 30,732 | 12.56% | $ 19,582 | >8.00% | $ 24,477 | >10.00% | |||||||||
Bank | $ 31,380 | 12.83% | $ 19,564 | >8.00% | $ 24,455 | >10.00% | |||||||||
Tier 1 risk-based capital: | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated | $ 27,634 | 11.29% | $ 9,791 | >4.00% | $ 14,686 | >6.00% | |||||||||
Bank | $ 28,285 | 11.57% | $ 9,782 | >4.00% | $ 14,673 | >6.00% | |||||||||
Tier 1 (leverage) capital: | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated | $ 27,634 | 8.05% | $ 13,728 | >4.00% | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
Bank | $ 28,285 | 8.28% | $ 13,668 | >4.00% | $ 17,085 | >5.00% | |||||||||
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require Cowlitz Bancorporation and Cowlitz Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the tables above) of Tier 1 capital to average assets, and Tier 1 and total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets (all as defined in the regulations). Currently, under a regulatory consent order issued by the FDIC, Cowlitz Bank is required to maintain a Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of at least 8%. Management believes that as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, Cowlitz Bancorporation and Cowlitz Bank met or exceeded all relevant capital adequacy requirements.
26
Regulatory Consent Order
On May 15, 2003, effective May 25, the FDIC, Cowlitz Bank's primary federal regulator, issued a Consent Order requiring a series of affirmative actions to address weaknesses and deficiencies identified in an earlier examination of the Bank with respect to its condition as of September 30, 2002. Since the examination date, the Bank has taken a number of steps to address the requirements, chief among them was hiring the replacements for the previous President/Chief Executive Officer and Credit Administrator. Under the Order, the Bank, among other things, will: refrain from paying any dividends without FDIC consent; review its strategic, profitability and liquidity plans; provide progress reports to the FDIC; maintain its well-capitalized status pursuant to a capital plan to ensure Tier 1 capital equaling or exceeding 8.0% of the Bank's total assets; establish and maintain an adequate allowance for loan and lease losses; refrain from extending credit to borrowers whose previous loans have been charged off; undertake a full internal audit of its Bay Mortgage division; retain an internal auditor and formulate and implement an effective internal audit policy; and will reduce the amount of classified assets identified in the examination to no more than 50% of Tier 1 capital plus the allowance for loan and lease losses by November 30, 2003 and will further reduce the amount to no more than 25% by December 31, 2004. If the Bank fails to adhere to the terms of the Order, the FDIC is empowered by federal statutes and regulations to assess civil monetary penalties or initiate other enforcement actions against the Bank, its management or the Board of Directors. Management believes the Bank is, or within the timelines set forth in the Order, will be, in compliance with the requirements of the Order.
Specifically, the Bank has not paid any dividends, has revised its strategic, profitability, and liquidity plans, which have been submitted to the FDIC for review, and has provided progress reports as required by the Order. The Company's current Tier 1 leverage ratio is 10.37%, exceeding the requirement to maintain Tier 1 capital at 8% of the Bank's total assets. Management believes that it has followed the provisions of the Order that require the Bank to establish and maintain and adequate allowance for loan losses and to refrain from extending credit to borrowers as outlined in the Order. The Bank's previously engaged internal audit firm has undertaken a full audit of the Bay Mortgage division. An internal auditor has been hired and will work with the Bank's current internal audit firm to formulate and implement an effective internal audit policy. From December 31, 2002 to June 30, 2003, the amount of classified assets identified in the examination had been reduced to 44.7% of Tier 1 ca pital plus the allowance for loan and lease losses. The objective of no more than 50% has been reached five months prior to the November 30, 2003 target date.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Credit Risk
The Company, like other lenders, is subject to credit risk, which is the risk of losing principal and interest due to customers' failure to repay loans in accordance with their terms. Although the Company has established lending criteria and an adequate allowance for loan losses to help mitigate credit risk, a continued downturn in the economy or the real estate market or a rapid increase in interest rates could have a negative effect on collateral values and borrowers' ability to repay. The Company's targeted customers are small to medium-size businesses, professionals and retail customers that may have limited capital resources to repay loans during a prolonged economic downturn.
Interest Rate Risk
The Company's earnings are largely derived from net interest income, which is interest income and fees earned on loans and investment income, less interest expense paid on deposits and other borrowings. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond the control of the Company's management, including general economic conditions, and the policies of various governmental and regulatory authorities. As interest rates change, net interest income is affected. With fixed rate assets (such as fixed rate loans) and liabilities (such as certificates of deposit), the effect on net interest income depends on the maturities of the assets and liabilities. The Company's primary objective in managing interest rate risk is to minimize the adverse impact of changes in interest rates on the Company's net interest income and capital, while structuring the Company's asset/liability position to obtain the maximum yield-cost spread on that structure. Interest rate risk is managed through the monitoring of the Company's gap position and sensitivity to interest rate risk by subjecting the Company's balance sheet to hypothetical interest rate shocks. In a falling rate environment, the spread between interest yields earned and interest rates paid, may narrow, depending on the relative level of fixed and variable rate assets and liabilities. In a stable or increasing rate environment the Company's variable rate loans will remain steady or increase immediately with changes in interest rates, while fixed rate liabilities, particularly certificates of deposit will only re-price as the liability matures. As experienced in the relatively stable rate environment during 2002 and the first six months of 2003, the interest rate spread has widened as long-term certificates of deposit have matured and re-priced at the current, lower rates or not been renewed.
27
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
In April 2003, the Company evaluated, under the supervision and the participation of Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
There have been no significant changes in the Company's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation.
28
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
The Company from time to time enters into routine litigation resulting from the collection of secured and unsecured indebtedness as part of its business of providing financial services. In some cases, such litigation will involve counterclaims or other claims against the Company. Such proceedings against financial institutions sometimes also involve claims for punitive damages in addition to other specific relief. The Company is not a party to any litigation other than in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate outcome of all pending legal proceedings will not individually or in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or the results of operations of the Company.
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
Not applicable
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable
Not applicable
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits. The following constitutes the exhibit index.
3.1*
Restated and Amended Articles of Incorporation of Registrant
3.2*
Bylaws of Registrant
10.1
Cowlitz Bancorporation 2003 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to appendix B to the Company's proxy statement for the 2003 annual meeting of shareholders filed April 15th, 2003.
10.2
Cowlitz Bancorporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to appendix A to the Company's proxy statement for the 2003 annual meeting of shareholders filed April 15th, 2003.
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2
Certification Chief Financial Officer
32
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
* Incorporated by reference from Registration Statement on Form S-1, Reg. No. 333-44355
(b) The Company did not file any reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ended June 30, 2003.
29
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: August 13, 2003
Cowlitz Bancorporation By: /s/ Richard J. Fitzpatrick |
|
Richard J. Fitzpatrick, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
/s/ Donna P. Gardner |
30
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Richard J. Fitzpatrick, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cowlitz Bancorporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is likely to materially affect the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
Date: August 13, 2003
/s/ Richard J. Fitzpatrick
Richard J. Fitzpatrick, Chief Executive Officer
Cowlitz Bancorporation
31
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
I, Donna P. Gardner, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cowlitz Bancorporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is likely to materially affect the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
Date: August 13, 2003
/s/ Donna P. Gardner
Donna P. Gardner, Chief Financial Officer
Cowlitz Bancorporation
32
CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
This certification is given by the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Cowlitz Bancorporation (the "Registrant") pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, with respect to the Registrant's quarterly report of Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
/s/ Richard J. Fitzpatrick
Richard J. Fitzpatrick
Chief Executive Officer
Cowlitz Bancorporation
/s/ Donna P. Gardner
Donna P. Gardner
Chief Financial Officer
Cowlitz Bancorporation
August 13, 2003
33