SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Campbell Place
Camden, New Jersey 08103-1799
Principal Executive Offices

Telephone Number: (856) 342-4800

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b — 2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).

There were 411,005,099 shares of Capital Stock outstanding as of June 2, 2005.

Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY CONSOLIDATED

Statements of Earnings

(unaudited)
(millions, except per share amounts)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

2

CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY CONSOLIDATED

Balance Sheets

(unaudited)
(millions, except per share amounts)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY CONSOLIDATED

Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)
(millions)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY CONSOLIDATED

Statements of Shareowners’ Equity

(unaudited)
(millions, except per share amounts)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

(a)	Basis of Presentation / Accounting Policies

The financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations, financial position, and cash flows for the indicated periods. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The accounting policies used in preparing these financial statements are consistent with those applied in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 1, 2004. Certain reclassifications were made to the prior year amounts to conform with current presentation. The results for the period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for other interim periods or the full year.

The company accounts for stock option grants and restricted stock awards in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and related Interpretations. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for stock options since all options granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying stock on the grant date. Restricted stock awards are expensed. The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings and earnings per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation.

1	Represents restricted stock expense.

6

(b)	Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The following table sets forth balance sheet information for intangible assets, excluding goodwill, subject to amortization and intangible assets not subject to amortization:

1	Amortization related to these assets was approximately $1 for the nine month periods ended May 1, 2005 and May 2, 2004. The estimated aggregated amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is less than $2 per year. Asset useful lives range from five to thirty-four years.

Changes in the carrying amount for goodwill for the period ended May 1, 2005 are as follows:

1	Information has been restated to conform with the current year presentation, which reflects a change in the company’s operating segments as described in Note (e).

7

(c)	Comprehensive Income

Total comprehensive income comprises net earnings, net foreign currency translation adjustments, minimum pension liability adjustments, and net unrealized gains (losses) on cash-flow hedges.

Total comprehensive income for the three months ended May 1, 2005 and May 2, 2004, was $138 and $78, respectively. Total comprehensive income for the nine months ended May 1, 2005 and May 2, 2004 was $709 and $688, respectively.

The components of Accumulated other comprehensive loss, as reflected in the Statements of Shareowners’ Equity, consisted of the following:

1	Includes a tax benefit of $112 as of May 1, 2005 and $121 as of May 2, 2004.

(d)	Earnings Per Share

For the periods presented in the Statements of Earnings, the calculations of basic EPS and EPS assuming dilution vary in that the weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution include the incremental effect of stock options and restricted stock programs, except when such effect would be antidilutive. Stock options to purchase 11 million and 18 million shares of capital stock for the three-month periods ended May 1, 2005 and May 2, 2004, respectively, and 17 million and 26 million shares of capital stock for the nine-month periods ended May 1, 2005 and May 2, 2004, respectively, were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price of the stock options exceeded the average market price of the capital stock and therefore, the effect would be antidilutive.

(e)	Segment Information

Campbell Soup Company, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, is a global manufacturer and marketer of high quality, branded convenience food products. Through fiscal 2004, the company was organized and reported the results of operations in four segments: North America Soup and Away From Home, North America Sauces and Beverages, Biscuits and Confectionery, and International Soup and Sauces.

As of fiscal 2005, the company changed its organizational structure and as a result reports the following segments: U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages, Baking and Snacking, International Soup and Sauces, and Other. Comparative periods have

8

been restated to conform to the current year presentation. The restatements also reflect a reallocation of certain expenses between corporate and the operating segments.

The U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages segment includes the following retail businesses: the Campbell’s condensed and ready-to-serve soups; Swanson broth and canned poultry; Prego pasta sauce; Pace Mexican sauce; Campbell’s Chunky chili; Campbell’s canned pasta, gravies, and beans; Campbell’s Supper Bakes meal kits; V8 vegetable juice; V8 Splash juice beverages; and Campbell’s tomato juice.

The Baking and Snacking segment includes the following businesses: Pepperidge Farm cookies, crackers, bakery and frozen products in U.S. retail; Arnott’s biscuits in Australia and Asia Pacific; and Arnott’s salty snacks in Australia.

The International Soup and Sauces segment includes the soup, sauce and beverage businesses outside of the United States, including Europe, Mexico, Latin America, the Asia Pacific region and the retail business in Canada.

The balance of the portfolio reported in Other includes Godiva Chocolatier worldwide and the company’s Away From Home operations, which represent the distribution of products such as soup, specialty entrees, beverage products, other prepared foods and Pepperidge Farm products through various food service channels in the United States and Canada.

Accounting policies for measuring segment assets and earnings before interest and taxes are substantially consistent with those described in the company’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The company evaluates segment performance before interest and taxes. Away From Home products are principally produced by the tangible assets of the company’s other segments, except for Stockpot soups, which are produced in a separate facility, and certain other products, which are produced under contract manufacturing agreements. Accordingly, with the exception of the designated Stockpot facility, plant assets are not allocated to the Away From Home operations. Depreciation, however, is allocated to Away From Home based on production hours.

9

May 1, 2005

10

May 2, 2004

1	Represents unallocated corporate expenses and unallocated assets, including corporate offices, deferred income taxes and investments.

11

Historical information on the reporting segments is as follows:

Fiscal Year 2004

Net Sales:

Earnings Before Interest and Taxes:

12

Fiscal Year 2003

Net Sales:

Earnings Before Interest and Taxes:

There were 53 weeks in fiscal 2003.

13

(f)	Inventories

	Approximately 52% of inventory in 2005 and 55% in 2004 is accounted for on the last in, first out (LIFO) method of determining cost. If the first in, first out inventory valuation method had been used exclusively, inventories would not differ materially from the amounts reported at May 1, 2005 and August 1, 2004.
(g)	Accounting for Derivative Instruments
	The company utilizes certain derivative financial instruments to enhance its ability to manage risk including interest rate, foreign currency, commodity and certain equity-linked employee compensation exposures that exist as part of ongoing business operations. Derivative instruments are entered into for periods consistent with related underlying exposures and do not constitute positions independent of those exposures. The company does not enter into contracts for speculative purposes, nor is it a party to any leveraged derivative instrument.
	All derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value. On the date the derivative contract is entered into, the company designates the derivative as (1) a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment (fair-value hedge), (2) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (cash-flow hedge), (3) a foreign-currency fair-value or cash-flow hedge (foreign-currency hedge), or (4) a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. Some derivatives may also be considered natural hedging instruments (changes in fair value are recognized to act as economic offsets to changes in fair value of the underlying hedged item and do not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133).
	Interest Rate Swaps
	The company finances a portion of its operations through debt instruments primarily consisting of commercial paper, notes, debentures and bank loans. The company utilizes interest rate swap agreements to minimize worldwide financing costs and to achieve a targeted ratio of variable-rate versus fixed-rate debt.
	Fixed-to-variable interest rate swaps are accounted for as fair-value hedges. Gains and losses on these instruments are recorded in earnings as adjustments to interest expense, offsetting gains and losses on the hedged item. The notional amounts of all outstanding fair-value interest rate swaps at May 1, 2005 totaled $875 with a maximum maturity date of October 2013. The fair value of such instruments was a gain of $4 as of May 1, 2005.

14

	Foreign Currency Contracts
	The company is exposed to foreign currency exchange risk as a result of transactions in currencies other than the functional currency of certain subsidiaries, including subsidiary financing transactions. The company utilizes foreign currency forward purchase and sale contracts, options and cross-currency swaps in order to manage the volatility associated with foreign currency purchases and sales and certain intercompany transactions in the normal course of business.
	Qualifying foreign exchange forward and cross-currency swap contracts are accounted for as cash-flow hedges when the hedged item is a forecasted transaction, or when future cash flows related to a recognized asset or liability are expected to be received or paid. The effective portion of the changes in fair value on these instruments is recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and is reclassified into the Statements of Earnings on the same line item and in the same period or periods in which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The assessment of effectiveness for contracts is based on changes in the spot rates. The fair value of these instruments was $(199) at May 1, 2005.
	Qualifying foreign exchange forward contracts are accounted for as fair-value hedges when the hedged item is a recognized asset, liability or firm commitment. There were no such fair-value contracts at May 1, 2005.
	The company also enters into certain foreign exchange forward and variable-to-variable cross-currency swap contracts that are not designated as accounting hedges. These instruments are primarily intended to reduce volatility of certain intercompany financing transactions. Gains and losses on derivatives not designated as accounting hedges are typically recorded in Other expenses, as an offset to gains (losses) on the underlying transactions. The fair value of these instruments was $(26) at May 1, 2005.
	Foreign exchange forward contracts typically have maturities of less than eighteen months. Cross-currency swap contracts mature in 2005 through 2014. Principal currencies include the Australian dollar, British pound, Canadian dollar, euro, Japanese yen and Swedish krona.
	As of May 1, 2005, the accumulated derivative net loss in other comprehensive income for cash-flow hedges, including the foreign exchange forward and cross-currency contracts, forward starting swap contracts, and treasury lock agreements was $16, net of tax. At May 2, 2004, the accumulated derivative net loss in other comprehensive income was $2, net of tax. Reclassifications from Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into the Statements of Earnings during the quarter ended May 1, 2005 were not material. Reclassifications during the remainder of fiscal year 2005 are not expected to be material. There were no cash-flow hedges discontinued before maturity during the quarter. At May 1, 2005, the maximum maturity date of any cash-flow hedge was August 2013.

15

	Other Contracts
	The company is exposed to equity price changes related to certain employee compensation obligations. Swap contracts are utilized to hedge exposures relating to certain employee compensation obligations linked to the total return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, the total return of the company’s capital stock and beginning in February 2005 the total return of the Puritan Fund. The company pays a variable interest rate and receives the equity returns under these instruments. The notional value of the equity swap contracts, which mature in 2006, was $47 at May 1, 2005. These instruments are not designated as accounting hedges. Gains and losses are recorded in the Statements of Earnings. The net gain recorded under these contracts at May 1, 2005 was approximately $1.
(h)	Restructuring
	A restructuring charge of $32 ($22 after tax) was recorded in the fourth quarter 2004 for severance and employee benefit costs associated with a worldwide reduction in workforce and with the implementation of a distribution and logistics realignment in Australia. These programs are part of cost savings initiatives designed to improve the company’s operating margins and asset utilization. Approximately 400 positions were eliminated under the reduction in workforce program resulting in a restructuring charge of $23. The reductions represent the elimination of layers of management, elimination of redundant positions due to the realignment of operations in North America, and reorganization of the U.S. sales force. The majority of the terminations occurred in the fourth quarter 2004.
	The distribution and logistics realignment in Australia involves the conversion of a direct store delivery system to a central warehouse system. As a result of this program, over 200 positions will be eliminated due to the outsourcing of the infrastructure. A restructuring charge of $9 was recorded for this program. The majority of the terminations have occurred in 2005.
	A summary of restructuring reserves at May 1, 2005 and related activity is as follows:

16

(i)	Pension and Postretirement Medical Benefits:
	The company sponsors certain U.S. and foreign defined benefit plans and U.S. postretirement medical benefit plans for employees. Components of benefit expense were as follows:

	In December 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act) was signed into law. The Act introduced a prescription drug benefit under Medicare Part D and a federal subsidy to sponsors of retirement health care plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. In accordance with FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 106-1, the company elected in January 2004 to defer recognizing the effects of the Act on accounting for postretirement health care plans until the FASB guidance was finalized.
	In May 2004, FASB issued FSP FAS 106-2, which provides accounting guidance to sponsors of postretirement health care plans that are impacted by the Act. The FSP is effective for interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2004. The company believes that certain drug benefits offered under postretirement health care plans will qualify for the subsidy under Medicare Part D. The effects of the subsidy were factored into the 2004 annual year-end valuation. The reduction in the benefit obligation attributable to past service cost was approximately $32 and has been reflected as an actuarial gain. The reduction in benefit cost for 2005 related to the Act is approximately $5.

17

	In the first quarter 2005, the company made a $35 voluntary contribution to a U.S. pension plan. Additional contributions to the U.S. pension plans are not expected this fiscal year. Contributions of $18 were made to the international plans as of May 1, 2005.
(j)	Contingencies
	On March 30, 1998, the company effected a spinoff of several of its non-core businesses to Vlasic Foods International Inc. (VFI). VFI and several of its affiliates (collectively, Vlasic) commenced cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on January 29, 2001 in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. Vlasic’s Second Amended Joint Plan of Distribution under Chapter 11 (the Plan) was confirmed by an order of the Bankruptcy Court dated November 16, 2001, and became effective on or about November 29, 2001. The Plan provides for the assignment of various causes of action allegedly belonging to the Vlasic estates, including claims against the company allegedly arising from the spinoff, to VFB L.L.C., a limited liability company (VFB) whose membership interests are to be distributed under the Plan to Vlasic’s general unsecured creditors.
	On February 19, 2002, VFB commenced a lawsuit against the company and several of its subsidiaries in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware alleging, among other things, fraudulent conveyance, illegal dividends and breaches of fiduciary duty by Vlasic directors alleged to be under the company’s control. The lawsuit seeks to hold the company liable in an amount necessary to satisfy all unpaid claims against Vlasic (which VFB estimates in the amended complaint to be $200), plus unspecified exemplary and punitive damages. While the ultimate disposition of complex litigation is inherently difficult to assess, the company believes the action is without merit and is defending the case vigorously.
	The company received an Examination Report from the Internal Revenue Service on December 23, 2002, which included a challenge to the treatment of gains and interest deductions claimed in the company’s fiscal 1995 federal income tax return, relating to transactions involving government securities. If the proposed adjustment were upheld, it would require the company to pay a net amount of approximately $100 in taxes, accumulated interest as of December 23, 2002, and penalties. Interest will continue to accrue until the matter is resolved. The company believes these transactions were properly reported on its federal income tax return in accordance with applicable tax laws and regulations in effect during the period involved and is challenging these adjustments vigorously. While the outcome of proceedings of this type cannot be predicted with certainty, the company believes that the ultimate outcome of this matter will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial condition or results of operation of the company.

18

(k)	Guarantees
	In November 2002, FASB Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45) “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” was issued. FIN 45 clarifies the requirements relating to a guarantor’s accounting for, and disclosure of, the issuance of certain types of guarantees. FIN 45 requires that upon issuance of a guarantee, the guarantor must recognize a liability for the fair value of the obligation it assumes under that guarantee. The initial recognition and measurement provisions are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002.
	The company guarantees approximately 1,350 bank loans made to Pepperidge Farm independent sales distributors by third party financial institutions for the purchase of distribution routes. The maximum potential amount of future payments the company could be required to make under the guarantees is approximately $110. The company’s guarantees are indirectly secured by the distribution routes. The company does not believe it is probable that it will be required to make guarantee payments as a result of defaults on the bank loans guaranteed. Prior to the adoption of FIN 45, no amounts were recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets related to these guarantees. The amounts recognized as of May 1, 2005 and May 2, 2004 were not material.
(l)	Supplemental Cash Flow Information
	Other cash used in operating activities for the nine month periods is comprised of the following:

(m)	Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
	In November 2004, SFAS No. 151 “Inventory Costs – an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4” was issued. SFAS No. 151 is the result of efforts to converge U.S. accounting standards for inventories with International Accounting Standards. SFAS No. 151 requires abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and spoilage to be recognized as current-period charges. It also requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 will be effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The company is in the process of evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 151, but does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on the financial statements.

19

	In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R (revised 2004) “Share-Based Payment.” SFAS No. 123R requires employee stock-based compensation to be measured based on the grant-date fair value of the awards and the cost to be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. The Statement eliminates the alternative use of APB No. 25’s intrinsic value method of accounting for awards which is the company’s current accounting policy for stock options. See Note (a) for the pro forma impact of compensation expense from stock options on net earnings and earnings per share. SFAS No. 123R is effective for the beginning of fiscal 2006. The company is in the process of evaluating the impact of this standard on the financial statements, which will depend on the timing and structure of future equity-based awards.
	In October 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act (the AJCA) was signed into law. The AJCA provides for a deduction of 85% of certain foreign earnings that are repatriated, as defined by the AJCA, and a phased-in tax deduction related to profits from domestic manufacturing activities. In December 2004, the FASB issued FSP FAS 109-1 and 109-2 to address the accounting and disclosure requirements related to the AJCA. The company is currently evaluating the impact of the AJCA along with the additional technical guidance issued by the U.S. Treasury Department. The company anticipates it will complete its evaluation by fiscal 2006. The company estimates the range of possible amounts considered for repatriation to be between zero and $570 and the related impact on income tax to be between zero and $30.
	In March 2005, the FASB issued FIN 47 “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143.” This Interpretation clarifies that a conditional retirement obligation refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and (or) method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. The obligation to perform the asset retirement activity is unconditional even though uncertainty exists about the timing and (or) method of settlement. Accordingly, an entity is required to recognize a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated. The liability should be recognized when incurred, generally upon acquisition, construction or development of the asset. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of the fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The company is in the process of evaluating the impact of FIN 47.

20

ITEM 2.

CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

Results of Operations

Overview

The company reported net earnings of $146 million for the third quarter ended May 1, 2005, versus $142 million in the comparable quarter a year ago. Earnings per share were $.35, compared to $.34 a year ago. (All earnings per share amounts included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis are presented on a diluted basis.) Net sales increased 4% to $1.7 billion. The prior year net earnings included a $10 million gain (net of $6 million in taxes) or $.02 per share from the settlement of a class action lawsuit. Current year earnings were favorably impacted by higher sales, lower Marketing and selling expenses as a percentage of sales, partially offset by higher net interest expense and a higher effective tax rate.

For the nine months ended May 1, 2005, net earnings were $611 million, compared to $588 million a year ago. Earnings per share were $1.48 compared to $1.43 a year ago. Net sales increased 7% to $6.1 billion. The prior year results include the gain from the litigation settlement previously noted. The increase in earnings over the prior year was due to the increase in sales, the favorable impact of currency and lower corporate expenses, partially offset by a decline in gross margin as a percentage of sales and an increase in net interest expense.

THIRD QUARTER

Sales

An analysis of net sales by reportable segment follows:

21

An analysis of percent change of net sales by reportable segment follows:

1	Represents revenue reductions from trade promotion and consumer coupon redemption programs.

In U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages, condensed soup sales increased 4%, ready-to-serve soup sales declined 6% and broth sales increased 7%. Total U.S. soup sales were flat compared with a year ago. The condensed soup sales growth was primarily due to successful merchandising and kids promotional marketing programs and increased advertising. Condensed soup sales also benefited from the installation of additional gravity-feed shelving systems. Sales of ready-to-serve soups declined due to lower volumes, reflecting shifts in marketing programs to the first and second quarters and strong competitive activity, partially offset by reduced promotional spending and higher selling prices. The convenience platform within ready-to-serve soups, which includes Campbell’s Soup at Hand and microwaveable bowls of Campbell’s Chunky and Select soups, had strong sales results. Sales of Prego pasta sauces and Pace Mexican sauces declined due to lower marketing and an increase in competitive activity. V8 vegetable juice sales increased due to higher prices and increased volume, while sales of V8 Splash juice beverages declined due to continued competitive pressures. The sales performance benefited from the introduction of Campbell’s Chunky chili.

In Baking and Snacking, Pepperidge Farm reported sales increases across all its businesses: bakery, cookies and crackers, and frozen. Sales of fresh bread and bakery products increased by double digits due to the performance of Pepperidge Farm whole grain breads, Pepperidge Farm Carb Style breads and rolls and the expanded distribution of Pepperidge Farm bagels and English muffins. Pepperidge Farm Goldfish snack crackers, cookies, frozen premium pot pies, frozen breads and frozen pastries also

22

contributed to the sales growth. Arnott’s reported a sales increase driven by strong customer programs and new product launches.

In International Soup and Sauces, sales in Europe increased primarily due to currency. Strong volume growth in France from Liebig wet soup and in Germany from Erasco wet soup was offset by lower volume in the United Kingdom. In Asia Pacific, sales increased due to volume gains in broth and beverages and the favorable impact of currency. Sales in Canada increased significantly due to volume gains in ready-to-serve soups and V8 beverages, and the favorable impact of currency.

In Other, Godiva Chocolatier sales increased, with double-digit growth in same-store sales in North America driven by new product introductions, increased merchandising activity, and increased advertising and promotions. Away From Home sales increased primarily due to the performance of refrigerated soups.

Gross Margin

Gross margin, defined as net sales less cost of products sold, increased $29 million. As a percent of sales, gross margin increased from 40.3% in 2004 to 40.4% in 2005. The percentage increase was due to productivity improvements (approximately 2.1 percentage points), higher selling prices (approximately 1.1 percentage points) and lower trade and consumer promotion (approximately 0.2 percentage points), partially offset by the impact of cost inflation and other factors (approximately 3.2 percentage points) and product mix (approximately 0.1 percentage points).

Marketing and Selling Expenses

Marketing and selling expenses decreased 1% in 2005 as a result of lower consumer promotions (approximately 4 percent), partially offset by higher selling expenses (approximately 2 percent) and the impact of currency translation (approximately 1 percent). As a percent of sales, Marketing and selling expenses were 16% in 2005 and 17% in 2004.

Administrative Expenses

Administrative expenses increased by $4 million, or 3%, due primarily to the impact of currency translation.

Other Expenses

In 2005, Other income was $2 million compared to Other income of $13 million in 2004. The change was due to a $16 million gain from the company’s share of a class action settlement involving ingredient suppliers in 2004, partially offset by lower expenses from currency hedging related to the financing of international activities.

23

Operating Earnings

Segment operating earnings increased 10% from the prior year.

An analysis of operating earnings by reportable segment follows: