Back to GetFilings.com





- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 0-23625

ANNUITY AND LIFE RE (HOLDINGS), LTD.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Bermuda Not applicable
(State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)



Cumberland House, 1 Victoria Street, Hamilton, HM 11, Bermuda
(Address of principal executive offices)


441-296-7667
(Registrant's Telephone number, including area code)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]


The number of the Registrant's Common Shares (par value $1.00 per share)
outstanding as of August 5, 2002 was 25,841,928.


THIS FILING INCLUDES UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED
BY OUR AUDITORS IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 10-01(d) OF REGULATION S-X PROMULGATED
BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. SEE "STATEMENT REGARDING REVIEW OF
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS" ON PAGE 2 OF THIS REPORT.



- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



INDEX TO FORM 10-Q



PAGE


Statement Regarding Review of Financial Statements........................................... 2

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets
June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 (as restated)............................................ 3

Consolidated Statements of Operations
Three and Six Months ended June 30, 2002 and June 30, 2001 (as restated).................... 4

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Three and Six Months ended June 30, 2002 and June 30, 2001 (as restated).................... 5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Six Months ended June 30, 2002 and June 30, 2001 (as restated) ............................. 6

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
Six Months ended June 30, 2002 and June 30, 2001 (as restated).............................. 7

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements......................................... 8-12

ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations................................................ 13-20

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk................................... 21

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings............................................................................ 22

ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.......................................... 22

ITEM 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K............................................................. 22

Signatures ............................................................................................. 23


- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


1



STATEMENT REGARDING REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As we announced in our press release of July 25, 2002, following
discussions with the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"SEC"), we determined that we would restate our financial statements for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, as well as for the three month period ended
March 31, 2002. Our restated financial statements for the year ended December
31, 2001 have recently been provided to the SEC, which is currently considering
the application of certain accounting pronouncements, including Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, to those financial statements. Because
of the pending SEC review, KPMG, our independent auditor, is not able to
complete its audit of the restated financial statements for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2001, or its review of the financial statements contained in
this report for the periods ended June 30, 2002 and June 30, 2001 (as restated)
until we have received further guidance from the SEC with respect to our
restated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2001. Accordingly,
this filing includes unaudited financial statements for the periods ended June
30, 2002 and June 30, 2001 (as restated) that have not been reviewed in
accordance with Rule 10-01(d) of Regulation S-X promulgated by the SEC, as well
as restated financial information for the year ended December 31, 2001 that has
not yet been subject to audit.


If the SEC's or KPMG's reviews result in any material changes to the
financial statements set forth herein, we will file an amended Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q. In addition, following the conclusion of the SEC's review process
and KPMG's audit, we will amend our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2001 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2002.

No certifications required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 accompany this
report. We intend to submit such certifications to the SEC upon completion of
the review and audit described above.



2



ANNUITY AND LIFE RE (HOLDINGS), LTD.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED AND IN U.S. DOLLARS)



JUNE 30, 2002 DECEMBER 31, 2001
------------------------- ----------------------

ASSETS AS RESTATED
(SEE NOTE 3)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS $ 61,451,277 $ 104,793,019
FIXED MATURITY INVESTMENTS AT FAIR VALUE (AMORTIZED COST OF
$387,088,613 AND $312,420,719 AT JUNE 30, 2002 AND
DECEMBER 31, 2001) 395,126,786 318,987,432
FUNDS WITHHELD AT INTEREST 1,447,876,547 1,489,689,347
ACCRUED INVESTMENT INCOME 5,499,599 4,897,063
RECEIVABLE FOR INVESTMENTS SOLD 1,265,214 23,815
RECEIVABLE FOR REINSURANCE CEDED 95,610,308 97,807,529
DEPOSITS AND OTHER REINSURANCE RECEIVABLES 67,040,095 76,139,222
DEFERRED POLICY ACQUISITION COSTS 211,306,270 209,074,192
OTHER ASSETS 11,131,494 9,360,971
------------------------- ----------------------

TOTAL ASSETS $ 2,296,307,590 $ 2,310,772,591
========================= ======================

LIABILITIES

RESERVES FOR FUTURE POLICY BENEFITS $ 254,695,355 $ 221,865,755
INTEREST SENSITIVE CONTRACTS LIABILITY 1,464,394,167 1,516,795,763
OTHER DEPOSIT LIABILITIES 147,000,000 137,000,000
OTHER REINSURANCE LIABILITIES 17,622,838 17,340,304
PAYABLE FOR INVESTMENTS PURCHASED 7,657,104 2,030,516
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES 10,947,530 10,751,099
------------------------- ----------------------

TOTAL LIABILITIES $ 1,902,316,994 $ 1,905,783,437
------------------------- ----------------------

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

PREFERRED SHARES (PAR VALUE $1.00; 50,000,000 SHARES
AUTHORIZED; NO SHARES OUTSTANDING) $ - $ -
COMMON SHARES (PAR VALUE $1.00; 100,000,000 SHARES
AUTHORIZED; 25,838,828 AND 25,705,328 SHARES OUTSTANDING
AT JUNE 30, 2002 AND DECEMBER 31, 2001) 25,838,828 25,705,328
ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL 334,478,932 332,447,062
NOTES RECEIVABLE FROM STOCK SALES (1,576,973) (1,317,259)
RESTRICTED STOCK (111,250 SHARES AT JUNE 30, 2002) (1,804,474) -
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 7,755,685 6,418,469
RETAINED EARNINGS 29,298,598 41,735,554
------------------------- ----------------------

TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 393,990,596 $ 404,989,154
------------------------- ----------------------

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 2,296,307,590 $ 2,310,772,591
========================= ======================


SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


3

ANNUITY AND LIFE RE (HOLDINGS), LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED AND IN U.S. DOLLARS)



FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
----------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
------------------ -------------------- ------------------ ------------------

REVENUES AS RESTATED AS RESTATED
(SEE NOTE 3) (SEE NOTE 3) (SEE NOTE 3)

NET PREMIUMS $ 92,065,743 $ 61,628,943 $ 170,072,634 $115,142,096
INVESTMENT INCOME, NET OF RELATED EXPENSES 26,366,669 19,605,194 50,956,459 42,695,004
NET REALIZED INVESTMENT GAINS 1,837,672 320,629 1,515,964 346,250
NET CHANGE IN FAIR VALUE OF EMBEDDED
DERIVATIVES (6,566,805) 1,846,981 (4,976,707) 1,698,054
SURRENDER FEES AND OTHER REVENUES 6,161,207 4,644,690 10,057,332 7,778,161
------------------ -------------------- ------------------ ------------------
TOTAL REVENUES $119,864,486 $ 88,046,437 $ 227,625,682 $167,659,565
------------------ -------------------- ------------------ ------------------

BENEFITS AND EXPENSES

CLAIM AND POLICY BENEFITS $ 74,443,139 $ 45,201,447 $ 133,258,745 $ 86,826,115
INTEREST CREDITED TO INTEREST SENSITIVE
PRODUCTS 20,948,167 4,497,407 38,870,513 11,188,877
POLICY ACQUISITION COSTS AND OTHER INSURANCE
EXPENSES 40,571,869 20,352,308 56,207,987 36,533,290
COLLATERAL COSTS 1,053,037 - 2,348,741 -
OPERATING EXPENSES 3,142,272 2,689,045 6,800,064 5,354,115
------------------ -------------------- ------------------ ------------------
TOTAL BENEFITS AND EXPENSES $140,158,484 $ 72,740,107 $ 237,486,050 $139,902,397
------------------ -------------------- ------------------ ------------------

NET (LOSS) INCOME BEFORE
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF A CHANGE
IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE $(20,293,998) $ 15,306,330 $ (9,860,368) $ 27,757,168

CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF A CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING
PRINCIPLE (NOTE 3) - - - (3,665,735)
------------------ -------------------- ------------------ ------------------

NET (LOSS) INCOME $(20,293,998) $ 15,306,330 $ (9,860,368) $ 24,091,433
================== ==================== ================== ==================

NET (LOSS) INCOME PER COMMON
SHARE BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF
A CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING
PRINCIPLE (NOTE 3)
BASIC............................. $ (0.79) $ 0.60 $ (0.38) $ 1.08
DILUTED.......................... $ (0.79) $ 0.54 $ (0.38) $ 0.99
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF A CHANGE
IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE PER COMMON
SHARE
BASIC............................ $ - $ - $ - $ (0.14)
DILUTED......................... $ - $ - $ - $ (0.13)

NET (LOSS) INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
BASIC............................ $ (0.79) $ 0.60 $ (0.38) $ 0.94
DILUTED......................... $ (0.79) $ 0.54 $ (0.38) $ 0.86


SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4


ANNUITY AND LIFE RE (HOLDINGS), LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(UNAUDITED AND IN U.S. DOLLARS)



FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
-------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
------------------- -------------------- ------------------- ------------------

AS RESTATED AS RESTATED
(SEE NOTE 3) (SEE NOTE 3) (SEE NOTE 3)

NET (LOSS) INCOME FOR THE PERIOD $ (20,293,998) $ 15,306,330 $ (9,860,368) $ 24,091,433

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS):

UNREALIZED HOLDING GAINS (LOSSES) ON
SECURITIES ARISING DURING THE PERIOD 8,688,887 (2,519,160) 2,853,180 1,912,030
LESS RECLASSIFICATION ADJUSTMENT FOR
REALIZED GAINS IN NET INCOME 1,837,672 320,629 1,515,964 346,250
------------------- -------------------- ------------------- ------------------

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) $ 6,851,215 $ (2,839,789) $ 1,337,216 $ 1,565,780
------------------- -------------------- ------------------- ------------------

TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME $ (13,442,783) $ 12,466,541 $ (8,523,152) $ 25,657,213
=================== ==================== =================== ==================


SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

5


ANNUITY AND LIFE RE (HOLDINGS), LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED AND IN U.S. DOLLARS)



FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
---------------------------------------------------
2002 2001
------------------------- -----------------------

(SEE NOTE 3) AS RESTATED
(SEE NOTE 3)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
NET (LOSS) INCOME $ (9,860,368) $ 24,091,433

ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET INCOME TO CASH
PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF A CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE - 3,665,735
NET REALIZED INVESTMENT (GAINS) LOSSES (1,515,964) (346,250)
NET CHANGE IN FAIR VALUE OF EMBEDDED DERIVATIVES 4,976,707 (1,698,054)
AMORTIZATION OF RESTRICTED STOCK 360,896
-
CHANGES IN:
ACCRUED INVESTMENT INCOME (602,536) (953,676)
DEFERRED POLICY ACQUISITION COSTS (2,232,078) (18,794,542)
DEPOSITS AND OTHER REINSURANCE RECEIVABLES 11,296,348 7,441,654
OTHER ASSETS (1,770,523) (1,226,194)
RESERVES FOR FUTURE POLICY BENEFITS 32,829,600 16,048,410
INTEREST SENSITIVE CONTRACTS, NET OF FUNDS WITHHELD (15,565,503) (22,216,259)
OTHER REINSURANCE LIABILITIES 282,534 8,102,651
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 196,431 210,907
------------------------- -----------------------

NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES $ 18,395,544 $ 14,325,815
------------------------- -----------------------

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
PROCEEDS FROM SALES OF FIXED MATURITY INVESTMENTS $ 287,775,850 $ 102,410,728
PURCHASE OF FIXED MATURITY INVESTMENTS (356,676,834) (133,011,744)
------------------------- -----------------------

NET CASH USED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES $ (68,900,984) $ (30,601,016)
------------------------- -----------------------

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
ISSUANCE OF SHARES $ - $ 2,734,330
INTEREST ACCRUED ON NOTES RECEIVABLE (48,334) (40,250)
INTEREST COLLECTED ON NOTES RECEIVABLE 38,620 -
ISSUANCE OF NOTE RECEIVABLE (250,000) -
DIVIDENDS PAID TO STOCKHOLDERS (2,576,588) (2,550,266)
INCREASE IN DEPOSIT LIABILITY 10,000,000 -
------------------------- -----------------------

NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES $ 7,163,698 $ 143,814
------------------------- -----------------------

DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS $ (43,341,742) $ (16,131,387)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD 104,793,019 52,691,974
------------------------- -----------------------

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD $ 61,451,277 $ 36,560,587
========================= =======================

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

6



ANNUITY AND LIFE RE (HOLDINGS), LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(UNAUDITED AND IN U.S. DOLLARS)



FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
---------------------------------------------------
2002 2001
------------------------- -----------------------

AS RESTATED
PREFERRED SHARES PAR VALUE $1.00 (SEE NOTE 3) (SEE NOTE 3)

BALANCE AT BEGINNING AND END OF PERIOD $ - $ -
------------------------- -----------------------

COMMON SHARES PAR VALUE $1.00
BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD $ 25,705,328 $ 25,499,999
ISSUANCE OF SHARES 133,500 180,829
------------------------- -----------------------

BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD $ 25,838,828 $ 25,680,828
------------------------- -----------------------

ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL
BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD $ 332,447,062 $ 329,496,091
ISSUANCE OF SHARES 2,031,870 2,553,501
------------------------- -----------------------

BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD $ 334,478,932 $ 332,049,592
------------------------- -----------------------

NOTES RECEIVABLE FROM STOCK SALES
BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD $ (1,317,259) $ (1,367,241)
ISSUANCE OF NOTE RECEIVABLE (250,000) -
INTEREST COLLECTED ON NOTES RECEIVABLE 38,620 -
ACCRUED INTEREST DURING PERIOD (48,334) (40,250)
------------------------- -----------------------

BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD $ (1,576,973) $ (1,407,491)
------------------------- -----------------------

RESTRICTED STOCK
BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD $ - $ -
ISSUANCE OF SHARES (2,165,370) -
AMORTIZATION OF RESTRICTED STOCK 360,896 -
------------------------- -----------------------

BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD $ (1,804,474) $ -
------------------------- -----------------------

ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD $ 6,418,469 $ 2,064,971
NET UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON SECURITIES 1,337,216 1,565,780
------------------------- -----------------------

BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD $ 7,755,685 $ 3,630,751
------------------------- -----------------------

RETAINED EARNINGS
BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD $ 41,735,554 $ 85,521,956
NET (LOSS) INCOME (9,860,368) 24,091,433
STOCKHOLDER DIVIDENDS (2,576,588) (2,550,266)
------------------------- -----------------------
BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD $ 29,298,598 $ 107,063,123
------------------------- -----------------------
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 393,990,596 $ 467,016,803
========================= =======================

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.


- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

7


ANNUITY AND LIFE RE (HOLDINGS), LTD.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. INFORMATION REGARDING THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Following discussions with the staff of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "SEC"), the Company determined that it would restate its
financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, as well as for
the three month period ended March 31, 2002. Because of a pending SEC review of
the Company's restated financial statements for the year ended December 31,
2001, the Company's independent auditors are not able to complete their audit of
the restated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001,
or their review of the financial statements contained in this report for the
periods ended June 30, 2002 and June 30, 2001 (as restated) until the Company
has received further guidance from the SEC with respect to its restated
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2001. Accordingly, this
filing includes unaudited financial statements for the periods ended June 30,
2002 and June 30, 2001 (as restated) that have not been reviewed in accordance
with Rule 10-01(d) of Regulation S-X promulgated by the SEC, as well as restated
financial information for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 that has not
yet been subject to audit.

2. ORGANIZATION

Annuity and Life Re (Holdings), Ltd. ("Holdings") was incorporated on
December 2, 1997 under the laws of Bermuda. Holdings provides annuity and life
reinsurance to insurers and reinsurers through its wholly-owned subsidiaries:
Annuity and Life Reassurance, Ltd., which is licensed under the laws of Bermuda
as a long-term insurer; and Annuity and Life Re America, Inc., an insurance
holding company based in the United States, and Annuity and Life Reassurance of
America, Inc., a life insurance company domiciled in the United States.
Holdings, Annuity and Life Reassurance, Annuity and Life Re America and Annuity
and Life Reassurance America are collectively referred to herein as the
"Company."

3. RESTATEMENT

In July 2002, the Company announced that it had determined that it had
embedded derivatives in certain of its fixed annuity reinsurance contracts that
are required to be bifurcated from their host contracts and accounted for
separately pursuant to FAS 133 - Accounting For Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities. The Company is required to carry these embedded derivatives
on its balance sheet at fair value and the unrealized changes in the value of
these embedded derivatives are reflected in net income as Net change in fair
value of embedded derivatives. The accumulated fair value of these embedded
derivatives at January 1, 2001 was a loss of $3,665,735 and this has been
accounted for as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. The
change in fair value of the Company's embedded derivatives during 2001 was a
gain of $5,029,027. Additionally, an adjustment of $1,320,184 has been made in
2001 to increase the amortization of deferred acquisition costs to reflect the
revised emergence of profits on the affected reinsurance agreements. For the
year ended December 31, 2001, the net impact on reported earnings was a $43,000
gain. The following table summarizes the effect, by quarter, of bifurcating and
separately accounting for the embedded derivatives contained in certain of the
Company's fixed annuity reinsurance agreements. The Net embedded derivative
gain or (loss) will increase or decrease, respectively, the Company's
previously reported net income.



Gross Embedded Increase or Net Embedded
Derivative Gain (Decrease) in Derivative Gain
or Loss DAC Amortization or (Loss)
--------------- ---------------- ---------------

Cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle @ January 1, 2001.. $(3,665,735) $(3,665,735)
First Quarter 2001....................... $ (148,927) $ (884,451) $ 735,524
Second Quarter 2001...................... $ 1,846,981 $ (257,264) $ 2,104,245
Third Quarter 2001....................... $(5,265,396) $ (269,009) $(4,996,387)
Fourth Quarter 2001...................... $ 8,596,369 $ 2,730,908 $ 5,865,461
----------- ----------- -----------
Full Year 2001........................... $ 1,363,291 $ 1,320,184 $ 43,107
----------- ----------- -----------

First Quarter 2002....................... $ 1,590,098 $ (598,981) $ 2,189,079
Second Quarter 2002...................... $(6,566,805) $ (903,739) $(5,663,066)
----------- ----------- -----------
Year to Date 2002........................ $(4,976,707) $(1,502,720) $(3,473,987)
----------- ----------- -----------

Cumulative from inception................ $(3,613,416) $ (182,536) $(3,430,880)
----------- ----------- -----------


The Company also determined that the $19,500,000 reserve component of
the $33,000,000 charge taken in the fourth quarter of 2001 in connection with
minimum interest guarantees on the Company's largest annuity reinsurance
contract that had been recorded as a component of the Company's Interest
sensitive contracts liability should have been accounted for as an adjustment to
its carried balance for deferred acquisition costs. As a result, in its restated
financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, the Company
will reclassify the $19,500,000 as a write down of deferred acquisition costs.
The reclassification will not change the Company's reported net loss for 2001;
however, certain components of the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet and
Consolidated Statements of Operations will change. The following table
highlights these changes as at December 31, 2001 and March 31, 2002 and for the
periods then ended.



AS REPORTED RESTATED CHANGE
----------- -------- ------

CHANGES TO THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS AT
DECEMBER 31, 2001
Funds withheld at interest $ 1,488,326,056 $ 1,489,689,347 $ 1,363,291
Deferred acquisition costs $ 229,894,376 $ 209,074,192 $ (20,820,184)
Interest sensitive contracts liability $ 1,536,295,763 $ 1,516,795,763 $ (19,500,000)

CHANGES TO THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001
Interest credited to interest sensitive products $ 68,758,418 $ 49,258,418 $ (19,500,000)
Policy acquisition and other insurance expenses $ 105,045,512 $ 125,865,696 $ 20,820,184


The change in the Deferred acquisition costs asset and Policy
acquisition and other insurance expenses include a change in amortization
of deferred acquisition costs related to the FAS 133 restatement mentioned
above of $1,320,184.



AS REPORTED RESTATED CHANGE
------------- ---------- -----------

CHANGES TO THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS AT
MARCH 31, 2002
Funds withheld at interest $1,477,785,478 $1,480,738,867 $ 2,953,389
Deferred acquisition costs $ 241,808,483 $ 219,412,542 $(22,395,941)
Interest sensitive contracts liability $1,524,818,385 $1,503,143,647 $(21,674,738)

CHANGES TO THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS, FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2002
Interest credited to interest sensitive products $ 14,660,400 $ 17,922,346 $ 3,261,946
Policy acquisition and other insurance expenses $ 19,497,045 $ 15,636,118 $ (3,860,927)



The change in Deferred acquisition costs asset reflects the cumulative
increase (from January 1, 2001 through March 31, 2002) in amortization of
deferred acquisition costs related to the FAS 133 restatement mentioned above of
$721,203. The change in Policy acquisition and other insurance expenses includes
a reduction in amortization of deferred acquisition costs of $598,981 related to
FAS 133.



8


4. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the
Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP") for interim financial
information and, except as noted in Note 1 above, in accordance with Regulation
S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes
required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have
been included in these financial statements. These consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the audited
consolidated financial statements contained in the Company's Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2001. As discussed in Notes 1 and 3 above, the
Company is in the process of restating its financial statements for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2001 primarily due to the adoption of FAS 133. The
Company intends to file an amended Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2001 as soon as its auditors have completed their audit of such restated
financial statements. In addition to the accounting policies noted in the
Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, the Company
notes the following:

Funds withheld at interest and embedded derivatives

Funds withheld at interest represents a receivable balance equivalent to
the Company's proportionate share of its ceding companies' statutory reserves
related to policies reinsured by the Company under annuity reinsurance
agreements written on a modified coinsurance or coinsurance funds withheld
basis. The premiums received by a ceding company on the policies underlying
these types of reinsurance agreements are used to purchase investment securities
that are managed by that ceding company or investment managers appointed by it.
Net investment income includes the Company's proportionate share of the
investment income and realized capital gains and losses on the sale of
investments purchased with those premiums, as well as distributions from the
embedded derivatives contained in certain of these agreements.

A portion of the Company's Funds withheld receivable asset contains
embedded derivatives which require bifurcation and separate accounting under FAS
133 - Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which the
Company adopted as of January 1, 2001. The net fair value of these embedded
derivatives is classified as part of the Company's Funds withheld asset on its
balance sheet. Changes in the fair value of these embedded derivatives are
reported in net income as Net change in fair value of embedded derivatives. The
Company has developed a cash flow model to estimate the fair value of these
embedded derivatives that uses various assumptions regarding future cash flows
under the relevant annuity reinsurance contracts. While management believes that
this model is appropriate and based upon reasonable assumptions, the assumptions
used are subjective and may require adjustment in the future. Such an adjustment
could have a significant impact on the fair value of these embedded derivatives
and reported earnings. The Company does not bifurcate and separately account for
the embedded derivatives contained in its largest annuity reinsurance agreement
because the agreement was acquired by the Company prior to the transition date
it elected under FAS 133, as amended by FAS 137.

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

9


5. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted
earnings per share for the three and six month periods ended June 30:



Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2002 2001 2002 2001
------------------ ------------------ --------------- ---------------

as restated as restated
(see Note 3) (see Note 3)
Net (loss) income available to common shareholders,
before cumulative effect of a change in accounting $ (20,293,998) $ 15,306,330 $ (9,860,368) $ 27,757,168
principle
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
- - - (3,665,735)
------------------ ------------------ --------------- ---------------
Net (loss) income available to common shareholders $ (20,293,998) $ 15,306,330 $ (9,860,368) $ 24,091,433
================== ================== =============== ===============

Basic:
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding 25,722,016 25,591,746 25,716,453 25,590,414
Net (loss) income per share before
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle $ (0.79) $ 0.60 $ (0.38) $ 1.08
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle $ - $ - $ - $ (0.14)
------------------ ------------------ --------------- ---------------
Net (loss) income per share $ (0.79) $ 0.60 $ (0.38) $ 0.94
================== ================== =============== ===============
Diluted:
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding 25,722,016 28,211,313 25,716,453 28,097,367
Net (loss) income per share before cumulative
effect of a change in accounting principle $ (0.79) $ 0.54 $ (0.38) $ 0.99
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle $ - $ - $ - $ (0.13)
------------------ ------------------ --------------- ---------------
Net (loss) income per share $ (0.79) $ 0.54 $ (0.38) $ 0.86
================== ================== =============== ===============


6. BUSINESS SEGMENTS

During the first quarter of 2002, the Company began to separately track
financial results of its life and annuity operations in segments. Each segment
is defined by a dominant risk characteristic inherent in all products in that
segment. The life segment consists of all products where the dominant risk
characteristic is mortality risk. The annuity segment comprises all products
where the dominant risk characteristic is investment risk. In addition, as
discussed in Note 4 above, certain of the Company's modified coinsurance and
coinsurance funds withheld annuity reinsurance agreements have features that
constitute embedded derivatives that require bifurcation and separate accounting
under FAS 133 - Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
The change in the fair value of these embedded derivatives is included in the
annuity segment. Both the life and annuity segments have specific assets,
liabilities, stockholders' equity, revenue, benefits and expenses that apply
only to them. The corporate segment contains all stockholders' equity not yet
deployed to the life or annuity segment. In addition, the corporate segment
includes all capital gains and losses from sales of securities



10

in our portfolio and investment income on undeployed invested assets. Operating
expenses are allocated to the segments proportionately based upon the amount of
stockholders' equity deployed to the segment. The Company believes that
investors, and management, will better understand the Company's profitability,
risk profile and capital deployment through this change. There are no
intersegment transactions. The following table displays several key measurements
for each of our business segments.



LIFE ANNUITY
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 REINSURANCE REINSURANCE CORPORATE CONSOLIDATED
- -------------------------------- ------------- ---------------- --------------- -----------------

Revenues $ 95,060,455 $ 21,364,967 $ 3,439,063 $ 119,864,486
Benefits and expenses 88,003,140 51,180,813 974,531 140,158,484
------------- ---------------- --------------- -----------------
Segment Income (Loss) $ 7,057,315 $ (29,815,846) $ 2,464,532 $ (20,293,998)
============= ================ =============== =================
Total Assets $ 605,018,193 $ 1,550,494,167 $ 140,795,231 $ 2,296,307,591
============= ================ =============== =================

THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2001 (AS RESTATED,
SEE NOTE 3)
- ----------------------------------------------

Revenues $ 61,013,100 $ 22,762,419 $ 4,270,917 $ 88,046,436
Benefits and expenses 53,635,950 17,591,040 1,513,117 72,740,106
------------- ---------------- --------------- -----------------
Segment Income $ 7,377,150 $ 5,171,379 $ 2,757,800 $ 15,306,330
============= ================ =============== =================

Total Assets $ 333,362,942 $ 1,630,980,947 $ 270,959,673 $ 2,235,303,562
============= ================ =============== =================

SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002
- ------------------------------

Revenues $ 174,152,051 $ 48,253,437 $ 5,220,194 $ 227,625,682
Benefits and expenses 159,949,356 75,173,120 2,363,574 237,486,050
------------- ---------------- --------------- -----------------
Segment Income (Loss) $ 14,202,695 $ (26,919,683) $ 2,856,620 $ (9,860,368)
============= ================ =============== =================

SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2001 (AS RESTATED,
SEE NOTE 3)
- --------------------------------------------

Revenues $ 113,416,210 $ 46,300,085 $ 7,943,270 $ 167,659,565
Benefits and expenses 101,904,938 34,967,083 3,030,376 139,902,397
------------- ---------------- --------------- -----------------
Segment Income before cumulative effect
of change in accounting principle 11,511,272 11,333,002 4,912,894 27,757,168
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle - (3,665,735) - (3,665,735)
------------- ---------------- --------------- -----------------
Net segment income $ 11,511,272 $ 7,667,267 $ 4,912,894 $ 24,091,433
============= ================ =============== =================



7. ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In July 2001, the FASB issued Statement Number 141 -- Business
Combinations and Statement Number 142 -- Goodwill and Intangible Assets. These
statements changed how the Company accounts for business combinations and for
purchased goodwill and other intangible assets that arise from these
combinations. The Company adopted the new standards on January 1, 2002.

The Standards require that all business combinations be accounted for
using the purchase method and establish specific criteria for the recognition of
intangible assets separately from goodwill. Under the standards, goodwill is no
longer amortized but will be subject to an impairment test on at least an annual
basis. At June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, Other assets included unamortized
goodwill of $2.1 million. Goodwill amortization for the year ended December 31,
2001 was $116,000.

8. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the fourth quarter of 2001, the Company recorded a charge of $33
million related to its largest annuity reinsurance contract. In the first
quarter of 2002, the Company entered into an agreement with an affiliate of XL
Capital, a related party, which provides up to $10,000,000 of protection against
further losses related to this contract. The premium paid for this protection
was $1.5 million. The affiliate of XL Capital has the right, up to the amount of
any claims paid under the agreement, to be reimbursed from any proceeds the
Company receives from its arbitration proceeding with the ceding company. In
determining the additional write down of deferred acquisition costs on this
annuity reinsurance contract


- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11

of $24,796,000 during the second quarter of 2002, the Company anticipated
$10,000,000 of reinsurance recoveries from the affiliate of XL Capital.

Also in the first quarter of 2002, the Company purchased an aggregate
catastrophe excess of loss cover from an affiliate of XL Capital providing
protection from a single event, excluding acts of terrorism, causing a claim for
more than five policyholders. The premium for this coverage was $1,000,000.

9. RESTRICTED STOCK

In 2002, the Company adopted a restricted stock incentive compensation
program. Under the program, 133,500 shares of restricted stock, which vest on
the third anniversary of the grant date, were awarded to management. The fair
value of the restricted stock on the date of award and assuming all shares vest
was $2,165,000, which is reflected in the Company's balance sheet as common
stock and paid in capital. The fair value of this grant is being amortized on a
straight line basis over the three year vesting period. The unamortized balance
of the grant is reflected in the balance sheet as restricted stock.

10. CONTINGENCIES

During the second quarter of 2002, the Company served written notice of
arbitration in connection with two life reinsurance agreements. The Company is
seeking monetary damages and/or equitable relief from the ceding companies based
upon its contention that, in the case of the first ceding company, it failed to
disclose material facts, known to it, about the block of business being
reinsured when that business was underwritten, and in the second case, the
ceding company is unable to segregate from its records business that is properly
covered under the reinsurance agreement. No assurance can be given that a
monetary recovery will occur or equitable relief will be granted.

The Company has unsecured letters of credit of approximately $89 million
with Citibank, N.A. that have been posted as security to allow certain of the
Company's ceding companies to take credit on their statutory financial
statements for reinsurance obtained from the Company. In August of 2002,
Citibank notified the Company that the bank was reducing its aggregate exposure
to unsecured letters of credit. As a result, Citibank has requested that
unsecured letters of credit it has issued on behalf of the Company be secured
by October 31, 2002. Consequently, the Company is currently seeking to raise
capital that will fund its collateral requirements for its ceding companies,
which would eliminate the need for unsecured letters of credit from Citibank,
but no assurance can be given that the Company will be able to do so. If the
Company is unable to raise additional capital, it would be required to
retrocede a portion of its business to another reinsurer in order to effectively
relieve itself of the obligation to post collateral to its ceding companies.



12


ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS

GENERAL

Annuity and Life Re (Holdings), Ltd. was incorporated on December 2,
1997 under the laws of Bermuda. We provide annuity and life reinsurance to
select insurers and reinsurers through our wholly-owned subsidiaries: Annuity
and Life Reassurance, Ltd., which is licensed under the insurance laws of
Bermuda as a long-term insurer; and Annuity and Life Re America, Inc., an
insurance holding company based in the United States, and its subsidiary,
Annuity and Life Reassurance America, Inc., a life insurance company authorized
to conduct business in over 40 states of the United States and the District of
Columbia. We acquired Annuity and Life Reassurance America on June 1, 2000.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which
require our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts
of our assets, liabilities, stockholders' equity and net income. We believe that
the following critical accounting policies, as well as those set forth in our
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, detail the more significant
estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements.

In preparing our financial statements, we make assumptions about our
proportionate share of future investment income that will be earned from the
investment of premiums received from underlying policyholders by our ceding
companies and about future rates of lapse of policies underlying our annuity
reinsurance contracts when estimating future gross profits arising from such
contracts. These assumptions have a direct impact on the amount of estimated
future gross profits arising from these annuity reinsurance contracts and,
therefore, on the recoverability of the deferred acquisition costs carried on
our balance sheet for these contracts. While these estimates are based upon a
projection of our historical experience and information provided to us by our
cedents, actual results have in the past and in the future could differ
materially from our estimates. Such differences could be material to our future
results. If our assumptions for investment returns prove to be inaccurate, or if
lapse rates exceed our assumptions, we may be required to record additional
charges which would adversely impact future earnings.

Certain of our modified coinsurance and coinsurance funds withheld
annuity reinsurance agreements have features that constitute embedded
derivatives that require bifurcation and separate accounting under FAS 133 -
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. We have identified
an embedded derivative, similar to a total return swap arrangement, within our
Funds withheld receivable asset that we record in connection with these
agreements. The valuation of these embedded derivatives requires complex cash
flow modeling that uses various assumptions regarding future cash flows under
these contracts. The net fair value of these derivatives is classified as part
of our Funds withheld asset, and unrealized changes in value are reported in net
income as Net change in fair value of embedded derivatives. In addition to the
change in the fair value of these embedded derivatives being reported as a
component of net income, they also affect expected future profits utilized in
determining the amortization of deferred acquisition costs. While we believe
these estimates of future cash flows and other assumptions in our models were
reasonable when made, the assumptions used are subjective and may require
adjustment in the future. Therefore, actual results could differ materially from
our estimates. Such differences could be material to our future results. We do
not bifurcate and separately account for the embedded derivatives contained in
our largest annuity reinsurance agreement because we acquired that agreement
prior to the transition date elected by us under FAS 133, as amended by FAS 137.
Because of the nature of the assets underlying this contract, which are roughly
70% convertible bonds, the bifurcation and separate accounting for the embedded
derivatives contained in this contract would add significant volatility to our
reported results.

If actual events differ significantly from the underlying estimates and
assumptions used by management in the application of our accounting policies,
there could be a material adverse effect on our results of operations and
financial condition.

OPERATING RESULTS

Net Income. For the three months ended June 30, 2002, we had a net loss
of $(20,294,000) or $(0.79) per basic and fully diluted common share, as
compared with net income of $15,306,000 or $0.60 per basic common share and
$0.54 per common share on a fully diluted basis for the three months ended June
30, 2001. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, we had a net loss of
$(9,860,000) or $(0.38) per basic and fully diluted common share, as compared
with net income of

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

13

$24,091,000 or $0.94 per basic common share and $0.86 per common share on a
fully diluted basis for the six month period ended June 30, 2001. The decline in
net income for both periods was principally the result of a $24,796,000 write
down of deferred acquisition costs associated with our largest annuity
reinsurance contract, compared to $6,000,000 of income realized on the same
contract during the six months ended June 30, 2001, and unrealized losses on our
embedded derivatives. The write down was based on our estimate of the impact of
future minimum interest guarantee payments on profits arising from this
contract. For a more detailed discussion of the assumptions we made when
determining the amount of this write off of deferred acquisition costs, see
"-Segment Reporting - Annuity Segment." This charge and the unrealized losses on
our embedded derivatives were partially offset by continued growth in net income
of our life insurance business. As discussed elsewhere in this report, we have
begun to apply FAS 133 - Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, and the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle as
of January 1, 2001 was a loss of $(3,666,000) or $(0.14) per basic common share
and $(0.13) per common share on a fully diluted basis, which is reflected in our
net income for the six month period ended June 30, 2001.

Net Operating Income. In addition to net income, we report net operating
income. This is not a substitute for net income computed in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S.
GAAP), but is an important measure used by management, investors and others to
measure our results. We define net operating income as net income excluding
realized gains and losses from the sale of investments managed by us and also
excluding embedded derivative gains and losses (net of their effect on the
amortization of deferred acquisition costs) associated with certain of our
annuity reinsurance agreements. Our definition of net operating income may
differ from that used by other public life and annuity companies.

For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2002, net operating
income declined significantly from the comparable prior periods, primarily as a
result of the $24,796,000 write down of deferred acquisition costs associated
with our largest annuity reinsurance contract, compared to $6,000,000 of income
realized on the same contract during the six months ended June 30, 2001. Net
operating loss for the three month period ended June 30, 2002 was $(16,469,000),
compared with net operating income of $12,881,000 for the three months ended
June 30, 2001. Our net operating loss for the six months ended June 30, 2002 was
$(7,902,000), compared with net operating income of $24,571,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001. The net operating losses for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2002 were partially offset by growth in the operating
income of our life insurance business.

Net Premiums. Net premium revenue for the three and six month periods
ended June 30, 2002 was $92,066,000 and $170,073,000, an increase of 49% and
48%, respectively, over the net premium revenue reported for the three and six
month periods ended June 30, 2001. Substantially all the premium revenue was
derived from traditional ordinary life reinsurance developed directly and
through the use of intermediaries. The growth in premium revenue reflects the
level of new business written and the increase in the face amount of insurance
in force. At June 30, 2002, the total face amount of life insurance in force was
$137 billion compared with approximately $91 billion at June 30, 2001, a 51%
increase. New business writings and premium levels are significantly influenced
by the seasonal nature of the life reinsurance marketplace and by large
transactions and therefore can fluctuate from period to period.

As discussed in "-Liquidity and Capital Resources," the recent downgrade
of our financial strength ratings by three nationally recognized ratings
agencies, together with the request of one of our letter of credit providers
that we secure approximately $89.0 million of outstanding unsecured letters of
credit and our general need to satisfy the collateral requirements of our ceding
companies, will require us to raise additional capital. If we are unable to
raise such additional capital, our ability to write new business will be limited
and the historical growth rates we have achieved since commencing operations in
1998 will likely not be achieved in future periods. There can be no assurance
that we will be able to raise additional capital on terms acceptable to us that
will allow us to maintain our current book of business or to grow that business
in the future.

Net Investment Income. Total net investment income for the three and six
month periods ended June 30, 2002 was $26,367,000 and $50,956,000, as compared
with $19,605,000 and $42,695,000, respectively, for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2001. The increases in investment income are primarily
due to investment income on the deposit of $137,000,000 from a third party
reinsurer during the fourth quarter of 2001 that is used to fund collateral
requirements of our ceding companies. Our proportionate share of the investment
income earned on our Funds withheld asset for the three and six month periods
ended June 30, 2002 was $19,175,000 and $37,723,000, as compared to $14,564,000
and $32,614,000 for the comparable prior periods. The average yield earned on
our invested assets, excluding Funds withheld managed by our ceding companies,
for the six month period ended June 30, 2002 was approximately 6.0%, as compared
with 6.36% for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The decline in yield reflects
our higher than normal commitment to cash during the first six months of 2002 as
a result of receiving the $137,000,000 deposit late in the fourth quarter of
2001, and a generally lower interest rate environment.

Realized Investment Gains. Realized investment gains for the three month
periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 were $1,838,000 and $321,000, respectively.
For the six month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, realized investment
gains were $1,516,000 and $346,000, respectively. These gains result from normal
management of our investment portfolio intended to improve performance and
increase future operating income. We do not consider realized gains and losses
resulting from sales of our invested assets to be recurring components of
earnings. We make decisions concerning the sales of our invested assets based on
a variety of market, business and other factors.

During the six month period ended June 30, 2002, unrealized gains were
$1,337,000 as compared with unrealized gains of $1,565,000 during the six month
period ended June 30, 2001. Unrealized gains (losses) are principally related to
changes in the general level of interest rates during those periods.


14

Net Change in the Fair Value of Embedded Derivatives. Embedded
derivative gains and losses represent changes in the value of embedded
derivatives hosted by certain of our annuity reinsurance contracts. These
unrealized gains and losses result primarily from credit risk related changes in
market value of assets underlying certain of our fixed annuity reinsurance
contracts, changes in expected future cash flows and, to a lesser extent,
changes in interest rates. The embedded derivative gain or loss is computed by
comparing the market value change of the underlying assets to the change in a
notional portfolio with no credit risk. For the three and six month periods
ended June 30, 2002, the change in fair value of our embedded derivatives was an
unrealized loss of $(6,567,000) and $(4,977,000), respectively. For the three
and six month periods ended June 30, 2001, we had unrealized gains of $1,847,000
and $1,698,000, respectively. The unrealized losses during the three and six
month periods ended June 30, 2002 were primarily the result of credit defaults
and credit spreads widening in the telecommunications and energy sectors, which
trends have continued into the third quarter of 2002. The unrealized gain during
the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2001 were related to
repositioning of assets to increase spreads and shorten durations.

Surrender Fees and Other Revenue. Surrender fees and other revenue for
the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2002 was $6,161,000 and
$10,057,000, respectively, as compared with $4,645,000 and $7,778,000,
respectively, for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2001. This
income is primarily derived from net surrender fees related to our Interest
sensitive contract liabilities. This increase in revenue is primarily due to
increases in surrender and withdrawal levels during the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2002, as compared with the three and six month periods
ended June 30, 2001.

Claims and Policy Benefits. Claims and policy benefits for the three
month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 were $74,443,000 and $45,201,000, or
81% and 73%, respectively, of net premium. For the six months ended June 30,
2002 and 2001, claims and policy benefits were $133,259,000 and $86,826,000, or
78% and 75% of net premiums, respectively. Aggregate experience for the six
months ended June 30, 2002, excluding two underperforming life reinsurance
contracts, was within pricing parameters. We are currently in arbitration on the
two life reinsurance contracts that have generated mortality experience beyond
our pricing parameters. If we are unable to rescind, recapture, reprice, or
otherwise restructure these agreements, we may incur additional losses on these
contracts in future periods. Although we expect mortality to be fairly constant
over long periods of time, it will fluctuate from period to period. Reserves for
future policy benefits are determined by claims reported from ceding companies,
our aggregate experience, seasonal claim patterns and overall mortality trends.

Interest Credited to Interest Sensitive Contracts Liabilities. Interest
credited to Interest sensitive contracts liabilities, which are liabilities we
assume under certain annuity reinsurance agreements, for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2002 was $20,948,000 and $38,871,000, respectively, as
compared with $4,497,000 and $11,189,000, for the three and six month periods
ended June 30, 2001. These increases reflect the level of our Interest sensitive
contracts liabilities and are related to income earned on the related Funds
withheld at interest and minimum interest guarantee payments. The income earned
on the Funds withheld at interest for the three and six month periods ended June
30, 2002 was $19,175,000 and $37,723,000, respectively, and $14,564,000 and
$32,614,000, respectively, for the comparable prior periods.

Policy Acquisition and Other Insurance Expenses. Policy acquisition and
other insurance expenses, consisting primarily of allowances and amortization of
deferred policy acquisition costs, for the three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2002 were $40,572,000 and $56,208,000, respectively, and $20,352,000
and $36,533,000, respectively, for the comparable prior periods. The significant
increase in the second quarter of 2002 was caused by the write down of
$24,796,000 of deferred acquisition costs associated with our largest annuity
reinsurance contract. The increase in these costs also reflects the growth and
development of our life business. Generally, policy acquisition costs and other
insurance expenses fluctuate with business volume and changes in product mix.

Collateral Costs. Collateral costs comprise fees charged by a third
party reinsurer to provide cash deposits to us. These deposits are used to fund
excess statutory reserve requirements of our clients and are recorded on our
consolidated balance sheet as a deposit liability. These costs were $2,349,000
in the first six months of 2002. Because the collateral funding facility was not
in place until the fourth quarter of 2001, no costs were incurred in the first
six months of 2001.

Operating Expenses. Operating expenses for the three month period ended
June 30, 2002 were $3,142,000 or 2.8% of total revenue (excluding the net change
in fair value of embedded derivatives), as compared to $2,689,000 or 3.0% of
total revenue (excluding the net change in fair value of embedded derivatives)
for the comparable prior period. Operating expenses for the six month period
ended June 30, 2002 were $6,800,000 or 3.0% of total revenue (excluding the net
change in fair value of embedded derivatives), as compared to $5,354,000 or 3.2%
of total revenue (excluding the net change in fair value of embedded
derivatives) for the comparable prior period. We have incurred a higher than
normal level of legal expenses during the first six months of 2002 related to a
shelf registration statement we filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission relating to the offering in one or more transactions on a delayed
basis of up to $200,000,000 of senior debt securities; however, we consider the
operating expense level to be low by industry standards and to be in line with
our plan to be a low cost provider.


- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

15


SEGMENT RESULTS

During the first quarter of 2002, we began to separately track financial
results of our life and annuity operations in segments. Each segment is defined
by a dominant risk characteristic inherent in all products in that segment. The
life segment consists of all products where the dominant risk characteristic is
mortality risk. The annuity segment comprises all products where the dominant
risk characteristic is investment risk. In addition, as discussed in Note 3 to
our unaudited consolidated financial statements, certain of our modified
coinsurance and coinsurance funds withheld annuity reinsurance agreements have
features that constitute embedded derivatives that require bifurcation and
separate accounting under FAS 133 - Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities. The change in the fair value of these embedded derivatives
is included in the annuity segment. Both the life and annuity segments have
specific assets, liabilities, stockholders' equity, revenue, benefits and
expenses that apply only to them. The corporate segment contains all
stockholders' equity not yet deployed to the life or annuity segment. In
addition, the corporate segment includes all capital gains and losses from sales
of securities in our portfolio and investment income on undeployed invested
assets. Operating expenses are allocated to the segments proportionately based
upon the amount of stockholders' equity deployed to the segment. We believe that
investors and management, will better understand our profitability, risk
profile and capital deployment through this change.

Life Segment. Our life segment is our largest segment as measured by
profitability. For the three months ended June 30, 2002, segment income fell 4%
to $7,057,000 from $7,377,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2001. For the
six months ended June 30, 2002, segment income grew 23% to $14,203,000 from
$11,511,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2001. Revenues grew 56% to
$95,060,000 from $61,013,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2001, and 54% to
$174,152,000 from $113,416,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2001. Our
revenue growth was primarily driven by over 50% growth in life premiums. For
both the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2002, the balance of the
growth in revenue was derived from investment income earned on funds deposited
with us by a third party reinsurer that are used to fund collateral requirements
of our clients.

Premium growth in our life segment benefited materially from the
availability to us of our collateral financing facility. We believe that this
facility, which provides us with funds to secure a substantial portion of our
obligations to cedents, is unique in the life reinsurance industry and, if
additional funds will be available to us under this facility, may provide us
with a competitive advantage. However, this reinsurer may in the future provide
a similar facility to one or more of our competitors, which could have an
adverse impact on our new business growth.

Segment policy benefits and expenses grew 64% to $88,003,000 from
$53,636,000 in the second quarter of 2001, and 57% to $159,949,000 from
$101,905,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2001. Both increases reflect the
increase in premium volume and face amount of insurance inforce. Segment
benefits and expenses for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2002
include collateral costs of $1,053,000 and $2,349,000, respectively, associated
with our collateral funding facility that were not present in comparable periods
in 2001. Overall benefits and expenses, excluding the impact of two life
reinsurance contracts currently in arbitration, were in line with our
expectations.

Our life segment continued to perform well with an operating margin of
7.4% and return on equity of 15.5% for the second quarter of 2002, as compared
to 12.1% and 23.6%, respectively, for the second quarter of 2001.

Annuity Segment. Our annuity segment contains the majority of our
assets. While we expect this segment will be a small contributor to our net
income, it contains significant volatility from two sources. First, under FAS
133, we must bifurcate and separately account for embedded derivatives in
certain of our annuity reinsurance agreements. The change in the value of the
embedded derivatives is reported in income every quarter. The change in the
value of the embedded derivatives can be large and is driven by financial
market conditions, most notably credit risk related changes. Second, our largest
annuity reinsurance contract exhibits volatility based upon estimated exposure
to minimum interest guarantees, which is in turn based on estimates of future
investment performance and lapse experience. In 2001, we determined that this
annuity reinsurance contract was in a loss position and wrote down a total of
$44,200,000 of deferred acquisition costs. In 2002, we purchased $10,000,000
million of reinsurance from an affiliate of XL Capital, a related party, for a
premium of $1,500,000 million, to provide an additional layer of protection.
During the second quarter of 2002, due to poor financial market performance that
did not meet our assumptions, we wrote down an additional $24,796,000 of
deferred acquisition costs. In determining the amount of this additional write
down of deferred acquisition costs on this annuity reinsurance contract, we
anticipated $10,000,000 of reinsurance recoveries from the affiliate of XL
Capital. This annuity reinsurance contract, which represents 57% of our annuity
assets, is not expected to generate income going forward. In estimating these
write downs, we were required to make estimates, including estimates of future
lapse rates on the underlying business and future investment income on the
assets supporting this business.

In connection with our write down of deferred acquisition costs for
2001, we assumed that convertible bonds, which comprise 70% of the portfolio of
invested assets managed by the ceding company under our largest annuity
reinsurance contract, would produce an annual investment return of 10% for
calendar year 2002, and 8% thereafter. The remainder of the portfolio of
invested assets consists of traditional income assets, for which we assumed a
6% return for 2002 and thereafter. Consistent with our experience for 2001, we
assumed annual policyholder lapse rates of 26% for 2002 and 21% for 2003.

Although management believed that these estimates were reasonable when
made, continuing poor equity market performance and slightly higher mortality
rates during 2002 required us to revise our estimates of the impact of future
minimum interest guarantee payments on profits arising from our largest annuity
reinsurance contract, resulting in the additional $24,796,000 write off of
deferred acquisition costs during the second quarter of 2002. In estimating the
amount of this additional write off, we considered actual investment results
achieved by the convertible bonds in the portfolio of invested assets for the
first half of 2002, and assumed an annual investment return of 0% on convertible
bonds for the remainder of 2002, with an 8% return assumed for 2003 and
thereafter. Our assumptions for annual investment return on traditional fixed
income securities included in the invested assets remains 6%. We also increased
our assumptions regarding annual policyholder lapse rates to 28% for the second
half of 2002 and 25% for 2003. While we believe that these estimates are more
appropriate in light of today's market environment than those made in 2001,
there can be no assurance that our estimates will prove to be accurate, and if
they do not, we may be required to write down additional deferred acquisition
costs or to recognize losses.


16

Our annuity segment loss for the three months ended June 30, 2002 was
$(29,816,000) compared with income of $5,171,000 for the three months ended June
30, 2001. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, our annuity segment loss was
$(26,920,000) compared to income of $7,667,000 for the six months ended June 30,
2001. Net income for the six months ending June 30, 2001 includes a loss of
$(3,666,000) from the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle as
of January 1, 2001 relating to the application of FAS 133 to our annuity
reinsurance contracts. The decline in income was principally the result of a
$24,796,000 write down of deferred acquisition costs on our largest annuity
reinsurance contract, compared to $6,000,000 of income realized on the same
contract during the six month period ended June 30, 2001. For the three and six
month periods ended June 30, 2002, the change in fair value of our embedded
derivatives (net of their related changes in deferred acquisition cost
amortization) was an unrealized loss of $(5,663,000) and $(3,474,000),
respectively. For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2001, we had
unrealized gains of $2,104,000 and $2,840,000, respectively, in the fair value
of our embedded derivatives (net of their related changes in deferred
acquisition cost amortization). These unrealized gains and losses represent
changes in the value of embedded derivatives hosted by certain of our annuity
reinsurance contracts. The unrealized loss during the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2002 were the result of credit defaults and credit
spreads widening in the telecommunications and energy sectors, which trends
have continued in the third quarter. The unrealized gain during the three and
six month periods ended June 30, 2001 were related to repositioning the
portfolio to increase spreads and shorten durations.

Total revenue for our annuity segment declined 6.1% for the second
quarter of 2002 to $21,365,000 from $22,762,000 in the second quarter of 2001.
Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2002 grew 4.0% to $48,253,000 from
$46,300,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2001. These changes are primarily
related to an increase in premiums collected and to a lesser extent from an
increase in investment income and are reduced by the unrealized loss during the
first and second quarters of 2002 on the embedded derivatives hosted by our
annuity reinsurance contracts discussed above.

Policy benefits and expenses for the annuity segment includes interest
credited to policyholders, minimum interest guarantee payments, segment specific
expenses and allocated expenses. These expenses grew to $51,181,000 for the
three months ended June 30, 2002 compared to $17,591,000 for the three months
ended June 30, 2001, and grew to $75,173,000 for the six months ended June 30,
2002 compared to $34,967,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The primary
components of these expenses are interest credited to policyholders and
amortization of deferred acquisition costs. In the second quarter we wrote down
$24,796,000 of deferred acquisition costs associated with our largest annuity
reinsurance contract. The performance of the assets supporting the policyholder
liabilities on this contract were not sufficient to meet the minimum guarantees
to the policyholder or the assumptions we made when we wrote off deferred
acquisition costs in the fourth quarter of 2001. In addition, interest credited
increased as a result of a contract we wrote in late 2001, which had no expenses
in the first half of 2001, and an increase in minimum interest guarantee
payments on our largest annuity reinsurance contract.

Our annuity line is not performing well due to our largest annuity
contract. Return on equity for the second quarter of 2002 was negative compared
to 27.1% for the second quarter of 2001. The decline in our second quarter 2002
return on equity reflects the write off of deferred acquisition costs.

Corporate Segment. The corporate segment includes all capital gains and
losses from our own portfolio, investment income on undeployed invested assets,
and a proportionate share of operating expenses based upon how stockholders'
equity is deployed to the life and annuity segments. As a result, the corporate
segment, while small relative to our company as a whole, will likely have
volatile results. Segment income declined 11% to $2,465,000 for the three months
ended June 30, 2002 compared to $2,758,000 for the three months ended June 30,
2001. For the six months ended June 30, 2002 segment income declined 42% to
$2,857,000 from $4,913,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2001. Revenues
declined by 20% to $3,439,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 compared
to $4,271,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2001. For the six months ended
June 30, 2002 revenues declined 35% to $5,220,000 from $7,943,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001. Both declines were primarily driven by the movement
of stockholders' equity to the life segment in support of its growth. Realized
capital gains of $1,838,000 and $1,516,000 for the three and six month periods
ending June 30, 2002 compared to $321,000 and $346,000, respectively, for the
comparable prior periods, slowed the rate of decline in corporate revenues for
both periods.

Benefits and expenses declined 36% to $975,000 for the three months
ended June 30, 2002 compared to $1,513,000 for the three months ended June 30,
2001. For the six months ended June 30, 2002 benefits and expenses declined 22%
to $2,364,000 from $3,030,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2001. Both
declines were driven by the deployment of stockholders' equity to the life
segment.


- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


17


FINANCIAL CONDITION

Investments

Cash & Fixed Maturity Investments

Invested assets, including cash and cash equivalents, amounted to
$456,578,000 at June 30, 2002 as compared with $423,780,000 at December 31,
2001. At June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 net unrealized gains on invested
assets were $7,756,000 and $6,418,000, respectively, and generally reflect the
changes in interest rates during the first six months of 2002. At June 30,
2002, our invested assets had a weighted average credit quality of "AA."

The Company's investment policy is designed to achieve above average
risk adjusted returns, maintain a high quality portfolio, maximize current
income, maintain an adequate level of liquidity and match the cash flows of the
portfolio to the required cash flows for the related liabilities.

Funds Withheld at Interest -- Interest Sensitive Contracts Liabilities

At June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 our Funds withheld receivables
were $1,447,877,000 and $1,489,689,000, respectively. The receivables represent
our share of the ceding companies' statutory reserves related to the policies
underlying our annuity reinsurance agreements. The value of the ceding
companies' statutory reserves, and consequently our Funds withheld receivable,
is calculated with reference to the premiums received by our ceding companies
with respect to the policies covered by our annuity reinsurance contracts, plus
all interest credited on those premiums, less any amounts paid to policyholders
upon surrender of such policies. We are allocated our proportionate share of the
investment income and realized capital gains and losses from those invested
premiums. The premiums paid to our ceding companies by underlying policyholders
are held and managed by the ceding companies or investment managers appointed by
the ceding companies. As a result, we do not directly influence the investment
strategy or performance of the invested premiums. The liability for our share of
the primary carrier's liability to its policyholders is included on our Balance
Sheet as Interest sensitive contracts liabilities.

At June 30, 2002, the premiums held and managed by our ceding companies
were invested in convertible bonds and fixed income securities having a weighted
average credit quality of "A" and a weighted average duration of 5.0 years. Also
at June 30, 2001, 3.9% of the premiums held and managed by our ceding companies
were invested in below investment grade securities, meaning the securities did
not have a weighted average credit quality in one of the top four ratings
categories assigned by commercial credit rating agencies. The average yield rate
earned on the invested premiums held and managed by our ceding companies was
approximately 5.14% for the six months ended June 30, 2002 compared with 4.70%
for the year ended December 31, 2001.

At June 30, 2002, approximately 41% of the premiums held and managed by
our ceding companies were invested in convertible bonds, with the remaining 59%
in fixed income securities. The value of convertible bonds is a function of
their investment value (determined by yield in comparison with the yields of
other securities of comparable maturity and quality that do not have a
conversion privilege) and their conversion value (their worth, at market value,
if converted into the underlying common stock). The investment value of
convertible bonds is influenced by changes in interest rates, with investment
value declining as interest rates increase and increasing as interest rates
decline, and by the credit standing of the issuer and other factors. The
conversion value of convertible bonds is determined by the market price of the
underlying common stock. If the conversion value is low relative to the
investment value, the price of the convertible bonds is governed principally by
their investment value. To the extent the market price of the underlying common
stock approaches or exceeds the conversion price, the price of the convertible
bonds will be increasingly influenced by their conversion value. Consequently,
the value of convertible bonds may be influenced by changes in the equity
markets, which have continued to decline since June 30, 2002.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our liquidity and capital resources are a measure of our overall
financial strength and our ability to generate cash flows from our operations to
meet operating and growth needs. Our principal sources of funds are premiums
received, net investment income, proceeds from investments called, redeemed or
sold, funds drawn from our collateral funding facility, and cash and short term
investments. The principal obligations and uses of the funds are the payment of
policy benefits, the posting of collateral so that our ceding companies can take
credit on their statutory financial statements for reinsurance obtained from us,
acquisition and operating expenses and the purchase of investments.


18


For the six month period ended June 30, 2002 we generated $18,396,000
from our operating activities as compared with $14,326,000 from our operating
activities for the six months ended June 30, 2001. This change is primarily
related to the development of our life insurance segment. At June 30, 2002 our
total capitalization was $393,991,000.

As a Bermuda reinsurer we are required to post collateral for the
statutory reserves ceded to us by U.S. based insurers and reinsurers. During
2001, we entered into a reinsurance agreement with a third party reinsurer to
cede excess U.S. Statutory reserves (the amount by which the cedents U.S.
Statutory reserves exceed our U.S. GAAP reserves for certain life insurance
contracts subject to certain state statutory regulations known as Triple-X) to
the reinsurer. Under the agreement, the reinsurer is obligated to fund the
collateral requirements associated with these excess U.S. Statutory reserves by
making cash deposits with us. Because this agreement does not qualify for
reinsurance accounting under U.S. GAAP, amounts received by us under the
agreement are classified on our balance sheet as a deposit liability due to a
third party reinsurer. As of June 30, 2002, we had received deposits of $147
million from the reinsurer. The reinsurer has the right to terminate the
agreement with 180 days notice, which would require us to return all deposits.
Absent a termination by the reinsurer or by us, the agreement will terminate and
all deposits received by us will be returned on the fifth anniversary of the
agreement unless it is extended by the parties. As part of this contract we
deposited $41 million with the reinsurer, which is included in Deposits and
other reinsurance receivables. We receive the benefit of investment income from
the investment of the funds received by us and our deposit with the reinsurer
and pay the third party reinsurer certain fees associated with the contract.
These fees, in part, are determined by the amount of deposits received by us.
For the first six months of 2002 these fees were $2,349,000 and are recorded as
Collateral costs in our Statement of Operations.

On March 1, 2002, we filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 to
register under the Securities Act of 1933 $200,000,000 of senior debt to be sold
in one or more transactions on a delayed basis. We may issue some or all of this
debt in the future. This debt, if and when issued, would be used for general
corporate purposes, including capital contributions to our operating
subsidiaries, and to fund collateral requirements of our cedents. In the future,
we may issue additional debt or other forms of capital to assist in meeting our
liquidity and capital needs, including funding the collateralization needs of
our cedents. During 2001, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase
program of up to $25,000,000 of our common shares. While our Board has given us
the flexibility to repurchase our common shares in the future if market
conditions so dictate, at the present time we anticipate utilizing this capital
to support our business growth.

At June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, letters of credit totaling $189
million and $197 million, respectively, issued in the ordinary course of our
business had been issued by our bankers in favor of certain ceding insurance
companies to provide security and meet regulatory requirements. At June 30, 2002
and December 31, 2001 letters of credit totaling $96 million and $101 million,
respectively, were fully collateralized by our investments. We also have
unsecured letters of credit of approximately $89 million with Citibank, N.A.
that have been posted as security to allow certain of our ceding companies to
take credit on their statutory financial statements for reinsurance obtained
from us. In August of 2002, Citibank notified us that the bank was reducing its
aggregate exposure to unsecured letters of credit. As a result, Citibank has
requested that unsecured letters of credit it has issued on our behalf be
secured by October 31, 2002. Consequently, we are currently seeking to raise
capital that will fund our collateral requirements for our ceding companies,
which would eliminate the need for unsecured letters of credit from Citibank,
but no assurance can be given that we will be able to do so. If we are unable to
raise additional capital, we would be required to retrocede a portion of our
business to another reinsurer in order to effectively relieve us of our
obligation to post collateral to our ceding companies.

At June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 investments of $294 million and
$272 million, respectively, were held in trust for the benefit of certain ceding
insurance companies to provide security and to meet regulatory requirements.

On April 25, 2002 our Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend
of $.05 per share payable to shareholders of record on May 17, 2002. The Board
of Directors intends to continue to declare and payout of earnings a quarterly
dividend. The continued payment of dividends is dependent on the ability of our
operating subsidiaries to achieve satisfactory underwriting and investment
results and other factors determined to be relevant by our Board of Directors.

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


19


During July 2002, following our announcement of our intention to write
down deferred acquisition costs on our largest annuity reinsurance contract,
three rating agencies reduced the financial strength ratings of each of our
operating subsidiaries. A.M. Best reduced the financial strength ratings of each
of our operating subsidiaries from "A" to "A-" and has announced that it is
reviewing these ratings and may change them downward. Standard & Poor's has also
reduced the financial strength ratings of each of our operating subsidiaries
from "A" to "A-" and has announced that the outlook on these ratings is
negative. Each of our operating subsidiaries' financial strength ratings has
also been reduced from "A" to "A-" by Fitch Ratings. Fitch Ratings has also
announced that these ratings are under review and may change downward. These
downgrades in our ratings, together with Citibank's request that we secure our
outstanding unsecured letters of credit and our general need to satisfy the
collateral requirements of our ceding companies, will require us to raise
additional capital. If we are unable to raise such additional capital, our
ability to write new business will be limited and the historical growth rates we
have achieved since commencing operations in 1998 will likely not be achieved in
future periods. There can be no assurance that we will be able to raise
additional capital on terms that are acceptable to us that will allow us to
maintain our current book of business or grow that business in the future.

The Company has no material commitments for capital expenditures as of
June 30, 2002.

FORWARD-LOOKING AND CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS

The Company and its representatives may from time to time make written
or oral forward-looking statements, including those contained in the foregoing
Management's Discussion and Analysis. In order to take advantage of the "safe
harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the
Company is hereby identifying certain important factors which could cause the
Company's actual results, performance or achievement to differ materially from
those that may be contained in or implied by any forward-looking statement made
by or on behalf of the Company. The factors that could cause the actual results
of operations or financial condition of the Company to differ include, but are
not necessarily limited to, the Company's ability to attract and retain clients;
a decline in the Company's financial ratings; the competitive environment; the
Company's ability to underwrite business; changes in mortality, morbidity and
claims experience; the Company's success in managing its investments; changes in
market conditions, including changes in interest rate levels; the ability of the
Company's cedents to manage successfully assets they hold on the Company's
behalf; unanticipated withdrawal or surrender activity; the impact of recent and
possible future terrorist attacks and the U.S. government's response thereto;
the loss of a key executive; regulatory changes (such as changes in U.S. tax law
and insurance regulation); and a prolonged economic downturn. Further
information about these and other factors may be found in our Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2001. The Company cautions that the foregoing list of
important factors is not intended to be, and is not, exhaustive. The Company
does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement that may be made from
time to time by or on behalf of the Company.


20


ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There have been no material changes since December 31, 2001 with
respect to our market risk exposure described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001. Please refer to "Item 7A: Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
However, as discussed in Notes 1 and 3 to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements, we are in the process of restating our financial statements for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 to implement FAS 133 - Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities effective in the first quarter of
2001 and will amend Item 7A accordingly. As a result, we have described below
additional exposure to market risk as of December 31, 2001.

Certain of our modified coinsurance and coinsurance funds withheld
annuity reinsurance agreements have features that constitute embedded
derivatives that require bifurcation and separate accounting under FAS 133. We
have identified an embedded derivative, similar to a total return swap
arrangement, within our Funds withheld receivable asset that we record in
connection with these agreements. The valuation of these embedded derivatives
requires complex cash flow modeling and assumptions, most notably with respect
to expected future cash flows. The net fair value of these embedded derivatives
is classified on our Balance Sheet as a component of our Funds withheld asset.
Changes in the fair value of these embedded derivatives are reported in net
income as Net change in fair value of embedded derivatives. While we believe
these estimates of future cash flows and other assumptions in our models were
reasonable when made, the assumptions used are subjective and may require
adjustment in the future.

The methodology we use to determine the fair value of the embedded
derivatives in our annuity reinsurance agreements that require bifurcation and
separate accounting under FAS 133 is to determine the value of the host contract
(notional asset) based upon expected future cash flows under the annuity
contracts. The fair value of the embedded derivative will be the market value of
the actual assets less the fair value of the notional asset. The change in fair
value of the embedded derivative is influenced by changes in credit risk,
interest rate changes, yield curve shifts and changes in expected future cash
flows under the annuity contracts.

The net impact on our embedded derivatives of a 50 basis point increase
or decrease in interest rates as a result of duration mismatching is a gain or
loss on the embedded derivative of approximately $263,000. The duration of the
actual assets is approximately 6.1 years and the duration of the notional asset
is approximately 6.2 years. As a result, we believe the impact of interest rate
movements on the embedded derivative will be small.

The net impact on our embedded derivatives of a 20 basis point increase
or decrease in credit spreads is a loss or gain on the embedded derivative of
approximately $3.8 million. The average credit quality of the actual assets is
"A-." The swap rate curves utilized by us to value the notional asset are
developed from a basket of financial institutions, which we believe approximates
the average credit quality of the actual assets. These swap rate curves reflect
changes in general market conditions. Because the average credit quality of the
actual assets is believed to be reasonably close to the average credit quality
of the entities comprising the swap rate curve, we believe it is unlikely that
credit spreads would increase or decrease by 20 basis points without a
corresponding effect on the swap rate curve. Based upon our regression analysis,
we assume a 20 basis point movement in spreads on the actual assets causes a 10
basis point parallel movement in the swap rate curve.

The table below shows the change in the fair value of our embedded
derivatives by quarter for 2001.



Change in Embedded Derivative Embedded Derivative
Value at Fair Value
------------------------------- -------------------------------

Cumulative Effect $ (3,665,735) $ (3,665,735)
First Quarter 2001 $ (148,927) $ (3,814,662)
Second Quarter 2001 $ 1,846,981 $ (1,967,681)
Third Quarter 2001 $ (5,265,396) $ (7,233,077)
Fourth Quarter 2001 $ 8,596,369 $ 1,363,292
First Quarter 2002 $ 1,590,098 $ 2,953,390


We implemented FAS 133 effective as of the first quarter of 2001 and,
consequently, there is no comparative information for 2000.

There have been no material changes since December 31, 2001 with respect
to our market risk exposures described above.

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


21


PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In May 2002, we served written notice of arbitration in connection with
two life reinsurance agreements. We are seeking monetary damages and/or
equitable relief from the ceding companies based upon our contention that, in
the case of the first ceding company, they failed to disclose material facts,
known to them, about the block of business being reinsured when it was
underwritten, and in the second case, the ceding company is unable to segregate
from its records business that is properly covered under the reinsurance
agreement. No assurance can be given that monetary recovery or equitable relief
will occur.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company was held on April 25,
2002. The following matters were voted upon at the Annual Meeting, and received
the votes set forth below:

(a) All of the following persons were elected to serve as directors
and received the number of votes set forth opposite their respective name:



FOR WITHHELD

Lee M. Gammill Jr. 14,462,415 3,875
Frederick S. Hammer 14,462,415 3,875
Jon W. Yoskin II 14,462,415 3,875


(b) A proposal to amend the Company's Bye-Laws to include an
exception to certain transfer restrictions included in the Bye-Laws for trades
executed on the New York Stock Exchange was approved and received 14,462,215
votes FOR and 1,950 votes AGAINST, with 2,125 abstentions and broker non-votes.

(c) A proposal to appoint KPMG as independent accountants for the
Company for the 2002 fiscal year was approved and received 14,463,680 votes FOR
and 435 votes AGAINST, with 2,175 abstentions and broker non-votes.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) Exhibits - None

(b) Reports on Form 8-K - We did not file any Current Reports on
Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission during the
quarter ended June 30, 2002.


22


ANNUITY AND LIFE RE (HOLDINGS), LTD.


SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Annuity and Life Re (Holdings), Ltd.



Date: August 15, 2002 / s / Lawrence S. Doyle
------------------------------
Name: Lawrence S. Doyle
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)



Date: August 15, 2002 / s / John F. Burke
--------------------------------
Name: John F. Burke
title: Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)




- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


23