Back to GetFilings.com
1
================================================================================
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 001-13243
PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
MARYLAND 33-0752457
(State of Incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1621-B SOUTH MELROSE DRIVE,
VISTA, CALIFORNIA 92083
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (zip code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (760) 727-1002
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
TITLE OF EACH CLASS NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE ON WHICH REGISTERED
----------------------------- -----------------------------------------
Common Stock, $0.01 par value New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
-------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes /X/ No / /.
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ ]
The aggregate market value of the shares of common stock held by
non-affiliates was approximately $180,198,000 based upon the closing price on
the New York Stock Exchange for such shares of $17.625 on March 18, 1999.
As of March 18, 1999, the number of shares of the Registrant's common
stock outstanding was 21,162,012.
2
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III of this report on Form 10-K incorporates by reference information
from the Registrant's definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the close of the Registrant's fiscal
year.
PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Page
----
ITEM 1. BUSINESS......................................................... 1
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES....................................................... 8
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS................................................ 19
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.............. 19
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS........................................... 19
ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA............................. 20
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS........................... 21
ITEM 7a. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK....... 29
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA...................... 29
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE........................ 29
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT............... 30
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION........................................... 30
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT.................................................... 30
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS................... 30
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON
FORM 8-K...................................................... 30
3
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc. (the "Company"), a self-administered
and self-managed real estate investment trust (a "REIT"), was formed in April
1997 to continue and expand the acquisition, ownership, management, leasing and
development business of Pan Pacific Development (U.S.) Inc. and its affiliates
(collectively, "PPD"). The Company's portfolio consists principally of community
and neighborhood shopping centers predominantly located in four key Western U.S.
markets. On August 13, 1997, the Company completed its initial public offering
(the "IPO").
As of December 31, 1998, the Company owned or controlled a portfolio of 54
shopping center properties (collectively, the "Properties"), of which 50 are
located in the Western United States including 12 in Northern California, 9 in
Southern California, 7 in Nevada and 22 in the Pacific Northwest (8 in
Washington and 14 in Oregon).
The Company employed 88 people as of December 31, 1998, including five
executive officers and senior personnel, in the areas of administration,
accounting services, property management, maintenance, leasing, acquisitions and
business development. The Company's executive offices are located at 1621-B
South Melrose Drive, Vista, California, and its telephone number is (760)
727-1002. In addition to personnel located at its executive offices, the Company
operates regional offices in Las Vegas, Nevada; Kent, Washington; Portland,
Oregon; Chino, California; and Sacramento, California. Each of the regional
offices is responsible for property management, maintenance and leasing.
The Company has made an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856
through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code")
commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1997. The Company believes
that, commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1997, it has been
organized and has operated in such a manner so as to qualify for taxation as a
REIT under the Code, and the Company intends to continue to operate in such a
manner, but no assurance can be given that it will continue to operate in such a
manner so as to qualify or remain qualified. Even if the Company qualifies for
taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain federal, state and
local taxes on its revenue and properties.
BUSINESS STRATEGIES
The Company's business strategies involve three fundamental practices:
o Owning and operating shopping centers in select markets with
strong economic and demographic characteristics in order to
establish and maintain a portfolio of real estate assets with
stable income and the potential for long-term growth;
o Developing local and regional market expertise through the
hands-on participation of senior management in property
operations and leasing in order to capitalize on market
trends, retailing trends and acquisition opportunities; and
o Establishing and maintaining a diversified and complementary
tenant mix with an emphasis on tenants that provide day-to-day
consumer necessities in order to provide steady rental
revenue.
GROWTH STRATEGIES
The Company's principal growth strategy is to acquire shopping centers
that provide an opportunity to expand in current markets or to establish a
presence in targeted markets with favorable economic and demographic
characteristics. The Company seeks to acquire properties that can benefit from
its hands-on management, that may require repositioning, redevelopment or
renovation or which can be purchased at attractive capitalization rates and are
consistent in terms of quality and location with the Company's existing
portfolio.
1
4
The Company seeks to continue to utilize its in-depth market knowledge
within its four key markets to pursue its strategy of opportunistic acquisitions
of shopping centers for long-term investment. The Company believes that
significant opportunities exist within these markets to acquire shopping center
properties that are consistent with its existing portfolio in terms of quality
of construction, positive submarket demographics and location attributes and
that provide attractive initial investment yields with potential for growth in
cash flow. The Company further believes it has certain competitive advantages
which enhance its ability to identify and capitalize on acquisition
opportunities, including: (i) long-standing relationships with institutional and
other owners of shopping center properties in the Company's four primary
regions; (ii) fully integrated real estate operations which enable the Company
to respond quickly to acquisition opportunities and to capitalize on the
resulting economies of scale; and (iii) access to capital as a public company.
Since the closing of the Company's IPO on August 13, 1997 through December
31, 1998, the Company has acquired 29 shopping centers totaling 3,482,920 square
feet of retail space for approximately $317.7 million. All of the properties are
located in the Company's four key markets, and 19 of the shopping centers (66%)
are anchored by grocery stores. Management believes that all of the centers are
located in markets with strong demographic characteristics. Management intends
to add value to these retail properties through the application of its active,
hands-on management and aggressive leasing strategies.
Although the Company believes that current market conditions generally
favor acquisitions, management intends to continue developing quality shopping
center properties when it believes market conditions and tenant opportunities
support favorable risk-adjusted returns. During 1998, the Company expanded the
size of its portfolio by completing the build out of four outparcels totaling
47,722 square feet of leasable area for approximately $3,400,000. All of the
newly developed space is leased. During 1999, the Company is planning to build
15,600 square feet of new space at two existing operating properties and deliver
one serviced parcel to a tenant at another, all subject to finalization of lease
agreements, entitlements and other conditions. In addition to the foregoing, the
Company has approximately 40,000 square feet of buildable expansion space at
five properties which management is working on pre-leasing.
The Company also seeks to maximize the cash flow from its existing
Properties by continuing to enhance the operating performance of each Property
through its in-house leasing and property management programs. The Company
aggressively pursues: (i) the leasing of currently available space; (ii) the
renewal or releasing of expiring leases at higher rental rates which management
believes currently are available based on improving market conditions and its
recent leasing activity; and (iii) economies of scale in the management and
leasing of properties that may be realized by focusing its acquisition and
development activities within its four primary regions.
FINANCING STRATEGIES
The Company's financing strategy is to maintain a strong and flexible
financial position by maintaining a prudent level of leverage, maintaining a
pool of unencumbered assets and managing its variable interest rate exposure.
The Company intends to finance future acquisitions with the most advantageous
sources of capital available to the Company, which may include the sale of
common stock, preferred stock or debt securities through public offerings or
private placements, the incurrence of additional indebtedness through secured or
unsecured borrowings and the issuance of operating units in exchange for
contributed property.
During 1998, the Company completed a secondary offering of 4,348,000
shares of common stock at $21.125 per share. The net proceeds to the Company
were approximately $85,913,000. The Company also obtained an increase to its
unsecured credit facility (the "Unsecured Credit Facility") from $150,000,000 to
$200,000,000 and a reduction in the top borrowing rate thereunder to LIBOR plus
1.375%.
Also, during 1998, the Company formed Pan Pacific (Portland), LLC ("PPP
LLC"), with the Company as sole managing member. In the fourth quarter, PPP LLC
acquired a portfolio of six shopping centers located in Oregon. In exchange for
four properties which were contributed to PPP LLC, 832,617 units were issued to
certain non-managing members. Distributions are made to the non-managing members
at a rate equal to the distribution being paid by the Company on a share of
common stock. A non-managing member can seek redemption of their units after the
first anniversary. The Company, at its option, may redeem the units by either
(i) issuing common stock at the rate of one share for each unit, or (ii) paying
cash.
2
5
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
On January 5, 1999, the Company purchased the remaining 50% interest in
Melrose Village Plaza, located in Vista, California, for $7,150,000, thereby
giving the Company a 100% interest in this 132,674 square foot neighborhood
shopping center anchored by Lucky Supermarket and Sav-On Drug Store.
DISPOSITIONS
The Company has no current intention to cause the disposition of any of
the Properties, although it reserves the right to do so if, after taking into
account the tax consequences of any disposition, including the Company's
continued ability to qualify as a REIT, it determines that such action would be
in its best interests.
CERTAIN CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS
REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT ASSOCIATED RISKS. Real property investments are
subject to varying degrees of risk. The yields available from equity investments
in real estate depend in large part on the amount of income generated and
expenses incurred. If the Properties do not generate revenue sufficient to meet
operating expenses, including debt service, tenant improvements, leasing
commissions and other capital expenditures, we may have to borrow additional
amounts to cover fixed costs. This would adversely affect our cash flow and
ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
Our revenue and the value of our properties may be adversely affected by a
number of factors, including:
o The national economic climate;
o The local economic climate;
o Local real estate conditions;
o Changes in retail expenditures by consumers;
o The perceptions of prospective tenants of the attractiveness
of the property;
o Our ability to manage and maintain the Properties and secure
adequate insurance; and
o Increases in operating costs (including real estate taxes and
utilities).
In addition, real estate values and income from properties are also affected by
factors such as applicable laws, including tax laws, interest rate levels and
the availability of financing.
OUR POTENTIAL INABILITY TO RETAIN TENANTS AND RELET SPACE. We will be
subject to the risks that, upon expiration or termination, leases may not be
renewed, the space may not be relet or the terms of renewal or reletting
(including the cost of required renovations) may be less favorable than current
lease terms. Leases covering a total of approximately 7.2% and 43.1% of the
leased gross leasable area ("GLA") of the Properties will expire through the end
of 1999 and 2003, respectively. We budget for renovation and reletting expenses,
which takes into consideration our view of both the current and expected market
conditions in the geographic regions in which the Properties are located, but we
cannot assure you that these reserves will be sufficient to cover these costs.
Our cash flow and ability to make expected distributions to stockholders could
be adversely affected, if:
o We are unable to promptly relet or renew leases for all or a
substantial portion of this space;
o The rental rates upon renewal or reletting are significantly
lower than expected; or
o Our reserves for these purposes prove inadequate.
3
6
DEPENDENCE ON MARKET CONDITIONS IN THE GEOGRAPHIC REGIONS. Twelve
Properties are located in Northern California, 9 Properties are located in
Southern California, 6 are located in Las Vegas, Nevada and 22 are located in
the Pacific Northwest (8 in Washington and 14 in Oregon). To the extent that
general economic or other relevant conditions in these regions decline and
result in a decrease in consumer demand in these regions, our performance may be
adversely affected.
POTENTIAL ILLIQUIDITY OF REAL ESTATE. Equity real estate investments are
relatively illiquid. This illiquidity tends to limit our ability to vary our
portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions. In
addition, the Code limits a REIT's ability to sell properties held for fewer
than four years, which may affect our ability to sell properties without
adversely affecting returns to holders of common stock.
COMPETITION WITH OTHER DEVELOPERS AND REAL ESTATE COMPANIES. There are
numerous commercial developers and real estate companies that compete with us in
seeking land for development, properties for acquisition and tenants for
properties. There are numerous shopping facilities that compete with the
Properties in attracting retailers to lease space. In addition, retailers at the
Properties face increasing competition from outlet stores, discount shopping
clubs, and other forms of marketing of goods, such as direct mail, internet
marketing and telemarketing. This competition may reduce properties available
for acquisition or development, reduce percentage rents payable to us and may,
through the introduction of competition, contribute to lease defaults or
insolvency of tenants. Thus, competition could materially affect our ability to
generate net income and to make distributions to our stockholders.
COST OF COMPLIANCE WITH CHANGES IN LAWS. Because increases in income,
service or transfer taxes are generally not passed through to tenants under
leases, these increases may adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to
make distributions to stockholders. The Properties are also subject to various
federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as requirements of the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and state and local fire and life safety
requirements. Failure to comply with these requirements could result in the
imposition of fines by governmental authorities or awards of damages to private
litigants. In addition, we cannot assure you that these requirements will not be
changed or that new requirements will not be imposed which would require
significant unanticipated expenditures by us. Any of these events could
adversely affect our cash flow and expected distributions.
RELIANCE ON CERTAIN TENANTS AND ANCHORS. Our income and funds from
operations could be adversely affected in the event of the bankruptcy or
insolvency, or a downturn in the business, of any anchor store, or if any anchor
tenant does not renew its lease when it expires. If tenant sales at the
Properties were to decline, tenants might be unable to pay their rent or other
occupancy costs. In the event of default by a tenant, delays and costs in
enforcing our rights could be experienced. In addition, the closing of one or
more anchor-occupied stores or lease termination by one or more anchor tenants
of a shopping center, whose leases may permit termination, could adversely
impact that Property and result in lease terminations or reductions in rent by
other tenants, whose leases may permit termination or rent reduction in those
circumstances. This could adversely affect our ability to re-lease the space
that is vacated. Each of these developments could adversely affect our funds
from operations and our ability to make expected distributions to stockholders.
LIMITATIONS ON CONTROL OF PARTIALLY-OWNED PROPERTIES. We own a 94%
partnership interest in the limited partnership that owns Chino Town Square. We
may have certain fiduciary responsibilities to third parties which we will need
to consider when making decisions relating to this Property. We will not have
sole control of certain major decisions relating to this Property and will need
to seek the consent of these third parties under certain circumstances such as
sales, refinancings, the timing and amount of additional capital contributions
to the Property and the transfer, assignment or pledge of our partnership
interests in the partnerships owning this Property. In addition, we may also
participate with other entities in property ownership through joint ventures or
partnerships in the future. Partnership or joint venture investments may, under
certain circumstances, involve risks not otherwise present, including:
o The possibility that our partners or co-venturers might become
bankrupt;
o These partners or co-venturers might at any time have economic
or other business interests or goals that are inconsistent
with our business interests or goals;
4
7
o These partners or co-venturers may be in a position to take
action contrary to our instructions or requests; and
o These partners or co-venturers may be in a position to take
action contrary to our policies or objectives, including our
policy with respect to maintaining our qualification as a
REIT.
LACK OF OPERATING HISTORY WITH RESPECT TO THE RECENT ACQUISITION AND
DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTIES. At December 31, 1998, we owned and operated 54
Properties, consisting of approximately 7.2 million square feet of owned space.
Twenty-two of the Properties have been acquired since January 1, 1998, and may
have characteristics or deficiencies currently unknown to us that affect their
value or revenue potential. It is also possible that the operating performance
of these Properties may decline under our management. As we acquire additional
properties, we will be subject to risks associated with managing new properties,
including lease-up and tenant retention. In addition, our ability to manage our
growth effectively will require us to successfully integrate our new
acquisitions into our existing management structure. We cannot assure you that
we will succeed with this integration or effectively manage additional
properties. We also cannot assure you that newly acquired properties will
perform as expected.
INFLUENCE OF CERTAIN AFFILIATES. Stuart Tanz, our Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer, through his and his families' ownership interests in
Revenue Properties Company Limited ("RPC") and RPC's ownership of Pan Pacific
Development (U.S.), Inc. ("PPD (U.S.)"), owns or controls over 50% of our total
outstanding shares of common stock as of March 15, 1999. In addition, PPD (U.S.)
has the right to nominate certain of our directors. Consequently, although the
Tanz family will not be able to take action on our behalf without the
concurrence of other members of our Board of Directors, they may be able to
exert substantial influence over our affairs. This influence might not be
consistent with the interest of other stockholders. In addition, there may be
conflicts between the interests of the public stockholders of RPC and our public
stockholders.
DEPENDENCE ON KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL. Our executive officers have
substantial experience in owning, operating, managing, acquiring and developing
shopping centers. We believe that our success will depend in large part upon
their efforts. If any key management personnel do not remain in our employ, we
could be materially adversely affected.
DEBT FINANCING AND EXISTING DEBT MATURITIES. We are subject to risks
normally associated with debt financing, including:
o The risk that our cash flow will be insufficient to meet
required payments of principal and interest;
o The risk that existing indebtedness on the Properties (which
in all cases will not have been fully amortized at maturity)
will not be able to be refinanced; or
o The terms of such refinancing will not be as favorable as the
terms of existing indebtedness.
At December 31, 1998, we had outstanding indebtedness of approximately
$282,524,000, including unamortized note payable premiums totaling $1,958,000,
which will mature over 14 years. Since we anticipate that only a small portion
of the principal of the indebtedness will be repaid prior to maturity, and that
we will not have funds on hand sufficient to repay the balance of the
indebtedness in full at maturity, it will be necessary for us to refinance the
debt either through additional borrowings or equity or debt offerings. If
principal payments due at maturity cannot be refinanced, extended or paid with
proceeds of other capital transactions, we expect that our cash flow will not be
sufficient in all years to pay distributions at expected levels and to repay all
this maturing debt. Also, if prevailing interest rates or other factors at the
time of refinancing (such as the reluctance of lenders to make commercial real
estate loans) result in higher interest rates upon refinancing, the interest
expense relating to refinanced indebtedness would increase. This could adversely
affect our cash flow and our ability to make expected distributions to our
stockholders. In addition, if we are unable to refinance the indebtedness on
acceptable terms, we might dispose of properties upon disadvantageous terms,
which might result in losses to us and might adversely affect funds available
for distribution to stockholders.
5
8
POTENTIAL DEFAULTS UNDER MORTGAGE FINANCING. At December 31, 1998, we had
approximately $142,066,000 in principal amount of mortgage financing. The
payment and other obligations under certain of the mortgage financing is secured
by cross-collateralized, and cross-defaulted first mortgage liens in the
aggregate amount of approximately $53,429,000 on four Properties and $18,768,000
on three Properties. If we are unable to meet our obligations under the mortgage
financing, the Properties securing that debt could be foreclosed upon. This
could have a material adverse effect on us and our ability to make expected
distributions and could threaten our continued viability.
RISING INTEREST RATES AND VARIABLE RATE DEBT. Advances under our unsecured
credit facility may bear interest at a variable rate. In addition, we may incur
other variable rate indebtedness in the future. Increases in interest rates on
such indebtedness would increase our interest expense, which could adversely
affect our cash flow and our ability to pay expected distributions to
stockholders. Accordingly, we may in the future engage in other transactions to
further limit our exposure to rising interest rates as appropriate and cost
effective.
TAX LIABILITIES AS A CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE TO QUALIFY AS A REIT.
Commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 1997, we believe that we
have qualified as a REIT under the Code. Qualification as a REIT involves the
satisfaction of numerous requirements (some on an annual and some on a quarterly
basis) established under highly technical and complex Code provisions for which
there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations. These
requirements involve the determination of various facts and circumstances not
entirely within our control. Legislation, new regulations, administrative
interpretations or court decisions may significantly change the tax laws with
respect to qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of
such qualification.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we would be subject
to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our
taxable income at regular corporate rates. Moreover, unless we were entitled to
relief under certain statutory provisions, we also would be disqualified from
treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which we
lost our qualification. This treatment would significantly reduce our net
earnings available for distribution to stockholders because of our additional
tax liability for the years involved. In addition, distributions to stockholders
would no longer be required.
ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENTS MAY NOT PERFORM AS EXPECTED. We
intend to continue acquiring, developing and redeveloping shopping center
properties. Acquisitions of retail properties entail risks that investments will
fail to perform in accordance with expectations. Estimates of development costs
and costs of improvements, to bring an acquired property up to standards
established for the market position intended for that property, may prove
inaccurate.
We intend to expand or renovate our Properties from time to time.
Expansion and renovation projects generally require expenditure of capital as
well as various government and other approvals, the receipt of which cannot be
assured. While policies with respect to expansion and renovation activities are
intended to limit some of the risks otherwise associated with such activities,
we will still incur certain risks, including expenditures of funds on, and
devotion of management's time to, projects which may not be completed.
We anticipate that future acquisitions, development and renovations will
be financed through a combination of advances under our unsecured credit
facility, other lines of credit and other forms of secured or unsecured
financing. If new developments are financed through construction loans, there is
a risk that, upon completion of construction, permanent financing for newly
developed properties may not be available or may be available only on
disadvantageous terms.
It is possible that we will in the future expand our business to new
geographic markets. We will not initially possess the same level of familiarity
with new markets outside of the geographic areas in which the Properties are
currently located. This could adversely affect our ability to acquire, develop,
manage or lease properties in any new localities.
6
9
We also intend to develop and construct shopping centers in accordance
with our business and growth strategies. Risks associated with our development
and construction activities may include:
o Abandonment of development opportunities;
o Construction costs of a property exceeding original estimates,
possibly making the property uneconomical;
o Occupancy rates and rents at a newly completed property may
not be sufficient to make the property profitable;
o Financing may not be available on favorable terms for
development of a property; and
o Construction and lease-up may not be completed on schedule,
resulting in increased debt service expense and construction
costs.
In addition, new development activities, regardless of whether they would
ultimately be successful, typically require a substantial portion of
management's time and attention. Development activities would also be subject to
risks relating to our inability to obtain, or delays in obtaining, all necessary
zoning, land use, building, occupancy, and other required governmental permits
and authorizations.
THE PROPERTIES MAY BE SUBJECT TO UNKNOWN ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES. Under
various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations,
a current or previous owner or operator of real estate may be required to
investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product
releases at the property. They may also be held liable to a governmental entity
or to third parties for property damage and for investigation and clean-up costs
incurred by these parties in connection with the contamination. These laws
typically impose clean-up responsibility and liability without regard to whether
the owner knew of or caused the presence of the contaminants. Liability under
these laws may still be imposed even when the contaminants were associated with
previous owners or operators and the liability under these laws has been
interpreted to be joint and several, unless the harm is divisible and there is a
reasonable basis for allocation of responsibility. The costs of investigation,
remediation or removal of these substances may be substantial, and the presence
of these substances, or the failure to properly remediate the contamination on
the property, may adversely affect the owner's ability to sell or rent the
property or to borrow using the property as collateral. The presence of
contamination at a property can impair the value of the property even if the
contamination is migrating onto the property from an adjoining property. Those
who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances at a
disposal or treatment facility may also be liable for the costs of removal or
remediation of a release of hazardous or toxic substances at the disposal or
treatment facility, whether or not the facility is owned or operated by them. In
addition, some environmental laws create a lien on the contaminated site in
favor of the government for damages and costs incurred in connection with the
contamination. Sometimes, the remedy to remediate contamination may include deed
restriction or institutional control, which can restrict how the property may be
used. Finally, the owner of a site may be subject to common law claims by third
parties based on damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination
stemming from the site.
Certain federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances govern
the removal, encapsulation or disturbance of asbestos containing materials
("ACMs") when these materials are in poor condition or in the event of
construction, remodeling, renovation or demolition of a building. These laws may
impose liability for release of ACMs and may allow third parties to seek
recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury
associated with ACMs. In connection with our ownership and operation of the
Properties, we may be potentially liable for these costs.
Shopping centers may have businesses such as dry cleaners and auto repair
or servicing businesses which handle, store and generate small quantities of
hazardous wastes. The operation may result in spills or releases from
time-to-time that can result in soil or groundwater contamination. Independent
environmental consultants have conducted or updated Phase I Environmental
Assessments (the "Phase I Assessments") at the Properties. These Phase I
Assessments have included, among other things, a visual inspection of the
Properties and the surrounding area and a review of relevant state, federal and
historical documents.
7
10
Our Phase I Assessments of the Properties have not revealed any
environmental liability that we believe would have a material adverse effect on
our business, assets or results of operations taken as a whole, nor are we aware
of any such material environmental liability.
It is still possible that our Phase I Assessments do not reveal all
environmental liabilities or that there are material environmental liabilities
of which we are unaware. Moreover, we cannot assure you that (i) future laws,
ordinances or regulations will not impose any material environmental liability
or (ii) the current environmental condition of the Properties will not be
affected by tenants, by the condition of land or operations in the vicinity of
the Properties (such as the presence of underground storage tanks), or by third
parties unrelated to us.
NO LIMITATION ON AMOUNT OF INDEBTEDNESS WE MAY INCUR. At December 31,
1998, our debt to total market capitalization ratio was approximately 39.2%
(assuming the conversion of PPP LLC units). We currently have a policy of
incurring debt only if upon incurrence the debt to total market capitalization
ratio would be 50% or less. It should be noted, however, that our organizational
documents do not contain any limitation on the amount of indebtedness we may
incur. Accordingly, the Board of Directors could alter or eliminate this policy.
If this policy were changed, we could become more highly leveraged, resulting in
an increase in debt service that could adversely affect our cash flow and,
consequently, reduce the amount available for distribution to stockholders. This
could increase the risk of default on our indebtedness.
CERTAIN TYPES OF LOSSES MAY EXCEED INSURANCE COVERAGE. We carry
comprehensive liability, public area liability, fire, earthquake, flood, boiler
and machinery, extended coverage and rental loss insurance covering the
Properties, with policy specifications and insured limits which we believe are
adequate and appropriate under the circumstances. There are, however, certain
types of losses that are not generally insured because it is not economically
feasible to insure against these losses. If an uninsured loss or a loss
exceeding insured limits occurs, we could lose our capital invested in the
Property, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the Property. In the
case of debt which is with recourse to us, we would remain obligated for any
mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the Property. In these
circumstances, any loss would adversely affect us.
DISPOSITION OF PROPERTIES WITH BUILT-IN GAIN. In connection with our
formation, certain entities taxable as "C" corporations were merged either into
us or into our subsidiaries which qualified as "qualified REIT subsidiaries".
Certain of these entities held 13 properties with "built-in gain" at the time
the entities were merged into us or into our subsidiaries. A property has
"built-in gain" if (i) on the day it was acquired, the former owner's tax basis
in the property was less than the property's fair market value, and (ii) it was
acquired in a transaction in which our tax basis in the property was determined
by reference to the former owner's tax basis in the property. Under Treasury
Regulations which have not yet been promulgated, if these properties are sold
within 10 years of the date we acquired them, we will be required to pay taxes
on the built-in gain that would have been realized if the merging "C"
corporation had liquidated on the day before the date of the mergers. Therefore,
we may have less flexibility in determining whether or not to dispose of these
properties. If we desire to dispose of these properties at some future date
within this 10 year period, we may be subject to tax on the built-in gain.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
GENERAL
As of December 31, 1998, the Properties consist of 54 neighborhood/
community shopping centers containing 8.2 million square feet of which 7.2
million square feet is owned by the Company with the balance owned by certain
retailers. The Properties are primarily situated in four key Western U.S.
markets including Northern California, Southern California, Nevada and the
Pacific Northwest, each of which the Company believes has attractive economic
and demographic characteristics. The largest concentration of Properties,
consisting of 34% of the total GLA, is located in California (20% of which is
located in Northern California and 14% is located in Southern California).
Another 20% of the total GLA is located in Nevada and 26% of the total GLA is
located in Oregon with 16% located in Washington. In addition, Properties
consisting of the remaining 4% of the total GLA are located in New Mexico,
Tennessee, Kentucky and Florida. As of December 31, 1998, 96.5% of the
Properties' total GLA was leased by 1,197 tenants.
8
11
The Properties are regionally managed under active central control by the
Company's executive officers. Property management, leasing, capital
expenditures, construction and acquisition decisions are centrally administered
at the Company's corporate office. The Company employs property managers at each
of its regional offices to oversee and direct the day-to-day operations of the
Properties, as well as the on-site personnel. Property managers communicate
daily with the Company's corporate offices to implement the Company's policies
and procedures.
As a result of management's in-house leasing program, the Properties
benefit from a stable, diversified merchandising mix. At December 31, 1998,
70.1% of the total leased GLA was leased to national tenants, 9.8% leased to
regional tenants and 20.1% to local tenants. To promote stability and attract
non-anchor tenants, the Company generally enters into long-term leases
(typically 15 to 20 years) with major or anchor tenants which usually contain
provisions permitting tenants to renew their leases at rates which often include
fixed rent increases or CPI adjustments from the prior base rent. At December
31, 1998, anchor tenants leased 59.0% of the total leased GLA, with only 49.6%
of anchor-leased GLA (29.3% of the total leased GLA) scheduled to expire within
the next 10 years. To take advantage of improving market conditions and changing
retail trends, the Company generally enters into shorter term leases (typically
three to five years) with non-anchor tenants. The Company's leases are generally
on a triple-net basis, which require the tenants to pay their pro rata share of
all real property taxes, insurance and property operating expenses.
9
12
PROPERTIES
The following table sets forth certain information for the 54 properties
owned at December 31, 1998.
Gross Leasable Area
-------------------
% Leased
Year Tenant as of
Completed/ Company Owned Owned Total 12/31/98
Property and Location Expanded (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.) (5)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
Brookvale Shopping Center ........ 1968/ 131,239 -- 131,239 100.0%
Fremont, CA 1989
Chico Crossroads ................. 1988/ 267,735 -- 267,735 99.6
Chico, CA 1994
Creekside Center ................. 1968 80,911 -- 80,911 98.9
Hayward, CA
Fairmont Shopping Center ......... 1988 104,281 -- 104,281 96.1
Pacifica, CA
Fashion Faire Shopping Center .... 1987 95,255 -- 95,255 100.0
San Leandro, CA
Glen Cove Center ................. 1990 66,000 -- 66,000 96.8
Vallejo, CA
Laguna Village ................... 1996 108,203 -- 108,203 100.0
Sacramento , CA
Lakewood Shopping Center ......... 1988 107,769 -- 107,769 100.0
Windsor, CA
Manteca Marketplace .............. 1972/ 172,435 -- 172,435 97.9
Manteca, CA 1988
Monterey Plaza ................... 1990 183,180 49,500 232,680 98.3
San Jose, CA
Rosewood Village ................. 1988 50,248 -- 50,248 91.6
Santa Rosa, CA
Westwood Village Shopping Center . 1981/ 102,375 -- 102,375 85.8
South Redding, CA 1998
--------- --------- --------- ------
Total/Weighted Average ............... 1,469,631 49,500 1,519,131 97.7%
========= ========= ========= ======
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Arlington Courtyard .............. 1991 12,221 -- 12,221 92.8%
Riverside, CA
Chino Town Square (2) ............ 1987 337,001 188,060 525,061 99.3
Chino, CA
Foothill Center .................. 1990 19,541 -- 19,541 69.9
Rialto, CA
Laurentian Center ................ 1988 97,131 -- 97,131 100.0
Ontario, CA
Melrose Village Plaza (2) ........ 1990 132,674 -- 132,674 97.8
Vista, CA
Palmdale Center .................. 1975 81,050 -- 81,050 100.0
Palmdale, CA
San Dimas Marketplace ............ 1997 154,020 117,000 271,020 100.0
San Dimas, CA
Tustin Heights Shopping Center ... 1983 131,518 -- 131,518 100.0
Tustin, CA
Vineyard Village East ............ 1992 45,200 -- 45,200 100.0
Ontario, CA
--------- --------- --------- ------
Total/Weighted Average ............... 1,010,356 305,060 1,315,416 98.8%
========= ========= ========= ======
PACIFIC NORTHWEST
24 Hour Fitness Building ......... 1989/ 40,000 -- 40,000 100.0%
Hillsboro, OR 1998
Bear Creek Plaza ................. 1977/ 183,998 -- 183,998 95.0
Medford, OR 1998
Canyon Ridge Plaza ............... 1995 81,747 181,300 263,047 100.0
Kent, WA
Claremont Village Plaza .......... 1955/ 88,706 -- 88,706 100.0
Everett, WA 1994
Hermiston Plaza .................. 1976/ 150,396 -- 150,396 100.0
Hermiston, OR 1998
Hood River ....................... 1967/ 104,162 -- 104,162 80.6
Hood River, OR 1979
Milwaukie Marketplace ............ 1989 185,859 10,323 196,182 100.0
Milwaukie, OR
Olympia Square ................... 1988 167,721 -- 167,721 94.6
Olympia, WA
Olympia West Center .............. 1980/ 69,212 3,800 73,012 100.0
Olympia, WA 1995
Oregon City Shopping Center ...... 1961/ 247,689 -- 247,689 98.2
Oregon City, OR 1983
Oregon Trail Shopping Center ..... 1977 210,784 -- 210,784 62.0
Gresham, OR
Pacific Commons .................. 1987 151,233 55,241 206,474 100.0
Spanaway, WA
Panther Lake ..................... 1989 69,090 44,237 113,327 96.7
Kent, WA
Pioneer Plaza .................... 1988 96,027 -- 96,027 88.9
Springfield, OR
Powell Valley Junction ........... 1990 100,583 -- 100,583 92.9
Gresham, OR
Annualized Base Rent
In Place at 12/31/98 (1)
--------------------
Total Ann.
Number Base
of Tenants Rent/
as of Leased
12/31/98 Ann. Base Sq. Ft.
Property and Location (5) Rent ($)(1) (4) Major Retailers
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
Brookvale Shopping Center ........ 18 $ 1,166,797 $ 8.89 Lucky Supermarket, Longs Drugs, Bally Fitness
Fremont, CA
Chico Crossroads ................. 17 2,033,799 7.63 Food-4-Less, HomeBase
Chico, CA Barnes & Noble, Office Depot
Creekside Center ................. 17 682,940 8.53 Lucky Supermarket, Longs Drugs
Hayward, CA
Fairmont Shopping Center ......... 28 1,153,508 11.51 Lucky Supermarket, Rite Aid
Pacifica, CA
Fashion Faire Shopping Center .... 17 1,329,088 13.95 Ross Dress for Less, Michael's, Pier 1 Imports
San Leandro, CA
Glen Cove Center ................. 10 821,876 12.86 Safeway Supermarket
Vallejo, CA
Laguna Village ................... 14 1,806,851 16.70 United Artists Theatre, 24 Hour Fitness
Sacramento , CA
Lakewood Shopping Center ......... 28 981,971 9.11 Raley's Supermarket, U.S. Post Office
Windsor, CA
Manteca Marketplace .............. 26 1,767,325 10.47 Save Mart Supermarket, Rite-Aid,
Manteca, CA Stadium 10 Cinemas, Ben Franklin Crafts
Monterey Plaza ................... 31 2,547,858 14.15 Wal-Mart, Lucky Supermarket(3), Walgreens
San Jose, CA
Rosewood Village ................. 18 671,436 14.59 Lad's Supermarket, Bradley Video
Santa Rosa, CA
Westwood Village Shopping Center . 21 636,993 7.25 Holiday Market, Rite Aid
South Redding, CA
----- ----------- -----------
Total/Weighted Average ............... 245 $15,600,442 $ 10.86
===== =========== ===========
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Arlington Courtyard .............. 5 $ 138,773 $ 12.24 Harvest Christian Bookstore
Riverside, CA
Chino Town Square (2) ............ 53 4,515,913 13.50 Target (3), Wal-Mart, Mervyn's (3),
Chino, CA Nordstrom Rack, AMC Theaters
Foothill Center .................. 7 110,756 8.11 PIP Printing
Rialto, CA
Laurentian Center ................ 25 1,141,008 11.75 Pep Boys, 24 Hour Fitness, Abbey Carpet
Ontario, CA
Melrose Village Plaza (2) ........ 30 1,401,123 10.80 Lucky Supermarket, Sav-On Drug
Vista, CA
Palmdale Center .................. 14 506,241 6.25 Smart & Final, Rite Aid,
Palmdale, CA Pic 'N' Save
San Dimas Marketplace ............ 23 2,296,415 14.91 Target, Office Max, Ross Stores,
San Dimas, CA Petco
Tustin Heights Shopping Center ... 21 1,629,570 12.39 Ralphs, Longs Drugs,
Tustin, CA Michael's Arts & Crafts
Vineyard Village East ............ 4 366,946 8.12 Sears, Dunn Edwards
Ontario, CA
----- ----------- -----------
Total/Weighted Average ............... 182 $12,106,745 $ 12.13
===== =========== ===========
PACIFIC NORTHWEST
24 Hour Fitness Building ......... 1 $ 466,815 $ 11.67 24 Hour Fitness
Hillsboro, OR
Bear Creek Plaza ................. 24 1,156,265 6.61 Albertsons, Bi-Mart, TJ Maxx,
Medford, OR Value Village
Canyon Ridge Plaza ............... 15 853,890 10.45 Target (3), Top Foods (3), Ross
Kent, WA Dress For Less
Claremont Village Plaza .......... 14 1,207,154 13.61 QFC Supermarket
Everett, WA
Hermiston Plaza .................. 24 755,449 5.02 Safeway Supermarket, Rite Aid
Hermiston, OR
Hood River ....................... 8 428,983 5.11 Rosauer's Supermarket, Hi School Pharmacy
Hood River, OR
Milwaukie Marketplace ............ 27 1,640,324 8.83 Albertsons, Rite Aid, Jo-Ann Fabrics
Milwaukie, OR & Crafts
Olympia Square ................... 35 1,788,270 11.28 Albertsons, Ross Dress For Less
Olympia, WA
Olympia West Center .............. 6 1,233,399 17.82 Barnes & Noble, Good Guys, Petco
Olympia, WA
Oregon City Shopping Center ...... 39 1,661,073 6.83 Emporium, Rite Aid Drugs, Fisherman's
Oregon City, OR Market, Michael's Arts & Crafts
Oregon Trail Shopping Center ..... 29 1,308,756 10.02 Office Depot, Michael's Arts & Crafts
Gresham, OR Mt. Hood Athletic Club
Pacific Commons .................. 23 1,521,610 10.06 Stockmarket Foods, K-Mart
Spanaway, WA
Panther Lake ..................... 20 884,010 13.23 Albertson's, Rite Aid
Kent, WA
Pioneer Plaza .................... 20 754,567 8.84 Safeway Supermarket
Springfield, OR
Powell Valley Junction ........... 6 774,585 8.29 Food-4-Less,
Gresham, OR Cascade Athletic Club
(1) Annualized base rent for all leases in place at December 31, 1998
calculated as follows: total base rent, calculated in accordance with
GAAP, to be received during the entire term of each lease, divided by the
terms in months of such leases, multiplied by 12.
(2) The company owns a 94% interest in Chino Town Square and 50% interest in
Melrose Village Plaza. Table reflects 100% of Property data.
(3) These retailers own their space and are not tenants of the company.
(4) Annualized base rent divided by the owned GLA leased at December 31, 1998.
(5) Percent leased and total number of tenants includes month to month leases.
10
13
Gross Leasable Area
-------------------
% Leased
Year Tenant as of
Completed/ Company Owned Owned Total 12/31/98
Property and Location Expanded (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.) (5)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy Marketplace ................ 1985 98,638 -- 98,638 100.0
Sandy, OR
Shute Park Plaza ................. 1989 58,560 -- 58,560 100.0
Hillsboro, OR
Southgate Shopping Center ........ 1957/ 50,862 -- 50,862 100.0
Milwaukie, OR 1986
Sunset Mall & Office ............. 1969/ 112,746 2,500 115,246 100.0
Portland, OR 1997
Sunset Square .................... 1989 352,523 11,943 364,466 97.4
Bellingham, WA
Tacoma Central ................... 1987/ 134,868 165,519 300,387 99.4
Tacoma, WA 1994
Tanasbourne Village .............. 1990 210,992 1,209 212,201 100.0
Hillsboro, OR
--------- --------- --------- ------
Total/Weighted Average ............... 2,966,396 476,072 3,442,468 94.8%
========= ========= ========= ======
NEVADA
Cheyenne Commons ................. 1992 362,758 -- 362,758 100.0%
Las Vegas, NV
Green Valley Town & Country ...... 1990 130,722 -- 130,722 97.2
Henderson, NV
Mira Loma Shopping Center 1985 94,361 2,546 96,907 92.4
Reno, NV
Rainbow Promenade ................ 1995/ 228,279 -- 228,279 100.0
Las Vegas, NV 1997
Sahara Pavilion North ............ 1989 333,679 -- 333,679 99.4
Las Vegas, NV
Sahara Pavilion South ............ 1990 160,682 -- 160,682 98.7
Las Vegas, NV
Winterwood Pavilion .............. 1990 127,975 -- 127,975 94.8
Las Vegas, NV
--------- --------- --------- ------
Total/Weighted Average ............... 1,438,456 2,546 1,441,002 98.5%
========= ========= ========= ======
OTHER
Country Club Center .............. 1988/ 57,626 63,000 120,626 88.2%
Albuquerque, NM 1998
Jumbo Sports ..................... 1990 51,542 40,000 91,542 64.0
Memphis, TN
Maysville Marketsquare ........... 1991/ 126,507 89,612 216,119 96.4
Maysville, KY 1993
Ocoee Plaza ...................... 1990 52,242 -- 52,242 100.0
Ocoee, FL
--------- --------- --------- ------
Total/Weighted Average ............... 287,917 192,612 480,529 89.6%
========= ========= ========= ======
PORTFOLIO
TOTAL/WEIGHTED AVERAGE ............... 7,172,756 1,025,790 8,198,546 96.5%
========= ========= ========= ======
Annualized Base Rent
In Place at 12/31/98 (1)
--------------------
Ann.
Number Base
of Tenants Rent/
as of Leased
12/31/98 Ann. Base Sq. Ft.
Property and Location (5) Rent ($)(1) (4) Major Retailers
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy Marketplace ................ 20 813,931 8.25 Thriftway Supermarket,
Sandy, OR Hi School Pharmacy
Shute Park Plaza ................. 22 700,748 11.97 True Value
Hillsboro, OR
Southgate Shopping Center ........ 10 581,959 11.44 Office Max
Milwaukie, OR
Sunset Mall & Office ............. 27 1,170,971 10.39 Safeway Supermarket, Homespun Crafters
Portland, OR
Sunset Square .................... 40 2,718,146 7.92 Ennen's Food, K-Mart,
Bellingham, WA Jo-Ann Fabrics & Crafts, Rite Aid
Tacoma Central ................... 21 2,109,999 15.74 Target (3), Top Food & Drug (3),
Tacoma, WA Office Depot, TJ Maxx, Cineplex Odeon
Tanasbourne Village .............. 40 2,602,597 12.34 Safeway Supermarket, Rite Aid, Jo-Ann Fabrics
Hillsboro, OR & Crafts, Pier 1 Imports
----- ----------- -----------
Total/Weighted Average ............... 471 $27,133,501 $ 9.65
===== =========== ===========
NEVADA
Cheyenne Commons ................. 46 $ 4,314,799 $ 11.89 Wal-Mart, 24 Hour Fitness,
Las Vegas, NV Ross Dress For Less
Green Valley Town & Country ...... 36 1,736,728 13.67 Lucky/Sav-On Superstore
Henderson, NV
Mira Loma Shopping Center 18 882,488 10.12 Scolari's Market, Longs Drugs
Reno, NV
Rainbow Promenade ................ 26 3,260,475 14.28 United Artists Theatre, Barnes & Noble,
Las Vegas, NV Linens 'N Things, Office Max, Cost Plus
Sahara Pavilion North ............ 69 4,325,676 13.04 Vons, Longs Drugs, TJ Maxx,
Las Vegas, NV Sheplers, Border's Books
Sahara Pavilion South ............ 22 2,209,731 13.93 Sports Authority, Office Max,
Las Vegas, NV Michael's Arts & Crafts
Winterwood Pavilion .............. 23 1,095,804 9.03 Vons, Heilig-Meyer Furniture
Las Vegas, NV
----- ----------- -----------
Total/Weighted Average ............... 240 $17,825,701 $ 12.58
===== =========== ===========
OTHER
Country Club Center .............. 19 $ 580,994 $ 11.43 Furr's Supermarket (3)
Albuquerque, NM
Jumbo Sports ..................... 10 368,619 11.17 Jumbo Sports (3), Hancock Fabrics
Memphis, TN
Maysville Marketsquare ........... 17 844,875 6.93 Wal-Mart (3), Kroger Company
Maysville, KY J.C. Penney
Ocoee Plaza ...................... 13 371,902 7.12 Food Lion, Family Dollar
Ocoee, FL
----- ----------- -----------
Total/Weighted Average ............... 59 $ 2,166,390 $ 8.40
===== =========== ===========
PORTFOLIO
TOTAL/WEIGHTED AVERAGE ............... 1,197 $74,832,779 $ 10.81
===== =========== ===========
(1) Annualized base rent for all leases in place at December 31,1998
calculated as follows: total base rent, calculated in accordance with
GAAP, to be received during the entire term of each lease, divided by the
terms in months of such leases, multiplied by 12.
(2) The company owns a 94% interest in Chino Town Square and 50% interest in
Melrose Village Plaza Table reflects 100% of Property data.
(3) These retailers own their space and are not tenants of the company.
(4) Annualized base rent divided by the owned GLA leased at December 31, 1998.
(5) Percent leased and total number of tenants includes month to month leases.
11
14
NATIONAL, REGIONAL AND LOCAL TENANT SUMMARY
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Company's
national, regional and local tenants at each Property owned at December 31,
1998.
NATIONAL TENANTS (1) REGIONAL TENANTS (1) LOCAL TENANTS (1)
---------------------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
% OF PROPERTY % OF PROPERTY % OF PROPERTY
% OF PROPERTY ANN. BASE % OF PROPERTY ANN. BASE % OF PROPERTY ANN. BASE
PROPERTY LEASED GLA RENT (2) LEASED GLA RENT (2) LEASED GLA RENT (2)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
Brookvale Shopping Center ....... 89.11% 79.74% 0.00% 0.00% 10.89% 20.26%
Chico Crossroads ................ 98.61 97.54 -- -- 1.39 2.46
Creekside Center ................ 76.64 57.55 1.82 3.27 21.54 39.18
Fairmont Shopping Center ........ 67.57 51.35 -- -- 32.43 48.65
Fashion Faire Place ............. 76.68 69.57 -- -- 23.32 30.43
Glen Cove Center ................ 84.04 77.82 -- -- 15.96 22.18
Laguna Village .................. 80.27 79.27 5.97 5.01 13.77 15.71
Lakewood Shopping Center ........ 79.41 69.00 1.37 1.78 19.21 29.22
Manteca Marketplace ............. 36.60 33.50 50.80 49.00 12.60 17.50
Monterey Plaza .................. 80.55 66.90 1.65 3.01 17.80 30.09
Rosewood Village ................ 10.42 16.30 44.98 39.47 44.60 44.23
Westwood Village Shopping Center 42.40 48.73 2.08 2.78 55.53 48.49
-------------------------- ------------------------- --------------------------
WEIGHTED AVERAGE .................... 73.91% 66.07% 8.44% 8.68% 17.64% 25.24%
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Arlington Courtyard ............. 21.58% 29.74% 45.41% 33.33% 33.01% 36.93%
Chino Town Square ............... 83.22 76.10 6.40 9.62 10.38 14.28
Foothill Center ................. 23.48 19.91 -- -- 76.52 80.09
Laurentian Center .............. 47.30 49.33 20.78 16.62 31.93 34.04
Melrose Village Plaza ........... 77.82 71.17 1.03 1.47 21.15 27.35
Palmdale Shopping Center ........ 85.74 69.86 -- -- 14.26 30.14
San Dimas Marketplace ........... 91.64 88.40 1.67 2.15 6.69 9.45
Tustin Heights Shopping Center .. 77.89 64.71 7.67 9.41 14.44 25.88
Vineyard Village East ........... 57.52 42.51 42.48 57.49 -- --
-------------------------- ------------------------- --------------------------
WEIGHTED AVERAGE .................... 77.24% 71.48% 8.05% 9.13% 14.71% 19.39%
PACIFIC NORTHWEST
24 Hour Fitness ................. 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Bear Creek Plaza ................ 84.41 73.50 9.08 13.68 6.52 12.81
Canyon Ridge Plaza .............. 83.70 82.16 10.20 10.90 6.11 6.94
Claremont Village ............... 68.22 71.02 6.91 7.18 24.87 21.79
Hermiston Plaza ................. 66.65 40.69 15.32 20.13 18.03 39.18
Hood River Shopping Center ...... 10.89 11.77 50.52 61.76 38.59 26.48
Milwaukie Marketplace ........... 75.46 52.68 2.15 7.56 22.39 39.77
Olympia Square .................. 72.42 63.82 17.99 24.30 9.59 11.87
Olympia West Center ............. 71.95 76.43 19.57 18.16 8.47 5.41
Oregon City Shopping Center ..... 65.82 45.11 5.27 13.91 28.91 40.99
Oregon Trail Shopping Center .... 53.96 53.34 5.55 10.49 40.49 36.16
Pacific Commons Shopping Center . 69.49 64.40 2.15 2.48 28.37 33.12
Panther Lake .................... 61.35 51.99 8.96 8.96 29.69 39.06
Pioneer Plaza ................... 17.68 16.50 10.73 20.44 71.59 63.07
Powell Valley Junction .......... 64.20 60.98 -- -- 35.80 39.02
(1) The company defines national tenants as any tenant that operates in at
least four metropolitan areas located in more than one region (i.e.,
northwest, northeast, midwest, southwest or southeast); regional tenants
as any tenant that operates in two or more metropolitan areas located
within the same region; local tenants as any tenant that operates stores
only within the same metropolitan area as the shopping center.
(2) Annualized base rent for all leases in place at December 31, 1998
calculated as follows: total base rent, calculated in accordance with
GAAP, to be received during the entire term of each lease, divided by the
terms in months for such leases, multiplied by 12.
12
15
NATIONAL TENANTS (1) REGIONAL TENANTS (1) LOCAL TENANTS (1)
---------------------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
% OF PROPERTY % OF PROPERTY % OF PROPERTY
% OF PROPERTY ANN. BASE % OF PROPERTY ANN. BASE % OF PROPERTY ANN. BASE
PROPERTY LEASED GLA RENT (2) LEASED GLA RENT (2) LEASED GLA RENT (2)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
Sandy Marketplace ............... 31.00 31.62 22.41 17.60 46.59 50.78
Shute Park Plaza ................ 25.85 19.48 15.96 20.39 58.19 60.12
Southgate Shopping Center ....... 70.63 62.12 10.69 13.24 18.67 24.64
Sunset Mall & Office ............ 48.92 26.97 6.84 12.18 44.24 60.86
Sunset Square ................... 63.34 48.22 29.83 39.43 6.82 12.35
Tacoma Central .................. 68.64 52.29 26.59 41.98 4.77 5.73
Tanasbourne Village ............. 61.10 50.59 14.28 20.36 24.62 29.06
-------------------------- ------------------------- --------------------------
WEIGHTED AVERAGE .................... 62.50% 53.50% 14.02% 19.13% 23.48% 27.37%
NEVADA
Cheyenne Commons ................ 90.32% 81.34% 0.68% 1.42% 8.99% 17.24%
Green Valley Town & Country ..... 51.47 40.07 3.69 5.50 44.84 54.43
Mira Loma Shopping Center ....... 27.32 28.14 1.52 2.02 71.16 69.84
Rainbow Promenade ............... 90.06 83.99 1.75 3.10 8.18 12.91
Sahara Pavilion North ........... 71.70 61.74 11.14 12.44 17.17 25.82
Sahara Pavilion South ........... 80.00 73.95 6.43 7.61 13.57 18.44
Winterwood Pavilion ............. 74.91 66.47 9.73 6.44 15.36 27.09
-------------------------- ------------------------- --------------------------
WEIGHTED AVERAGE .................... 76.37% 68.70% 5.06% 5.91% 18.57% 25.39%
OTHER
Country Club Center ............. 25.86% 34.69% 5.90% 6.51% 68.24% 58.80%
Jumbo Sports .................... 54.58 57.06 -- -- 45.42 42.94
Maysville Market Square ......... 90.44 87.84 4.30 5.20 5.26 6.95
Ocoee Plaza ..................... 77.44 75.28 -- -- 22.56 24.72
========================== ========================= ==========================
WEIGHTED AVERAGE .................... 70.41% 66.08% 3.19% 3.77% 26.39% 30.16%
========================== ========================= ==========================
PORTFOLIO WEIGHTED AVERAGE .......... 70.13% 63.04% 9.76% 11.71% 20.11% 25.24%
========================== ========================= ==========================
(1) The company defines national tenants as any tenant that operates in at
least four metropolitan areas located in more than one region (i.e.,
northwest, northeast, midwest, southwest or southeast); regional tenants
as any tenant that operates in two or more metropolitan areas located
within the same region; local tenants as any tenant that operates stores
only within the same metropolitan area as the shopping center.
(2) Annualized base rent for all leases in place at December 31, 1998
calculated as follows: total base rent, calculated in accordance with
GAAP, to be received during the entire term of each lease, divided by the
terms in months for such leases, multiplied by 12.
13
16
ANCHOR AND NON-ANCHOR TENANT SUMMARY
The following table sets forth certain information regarding anchor and
non-anchor tenants at December 31, 1998.
ANCHOR TENANTS (1) NON-ANCHOR TENANTS (1)
----------------------------- ---------------------------
% % OF PROPERTY % % OF PROPERTY
OCCUPIED ANN. BASE OCCUPIED ANN. BASE
PROPERTY GLA RENT GLA RENT
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
Brookvale Shopping Center ........ 73.59% 46.63% 26.41% 53.37%
Chico Crossroads ................. 85.56 76.29 14.44 23.71
Creekside Center ................. 65.80 27.09 34.20 72.91
Fairmont Shopping Center ......... 52.14 28.50 47.86 71.50
Fashion Faire Place .............. 54.66 38.04 45.34 61.96
Glen Cove Center ................. 78.79 71.06 21.21 28.94
Laguna Village ................... 79.27 78.23 20.73 21.77
Lakewood Shopping Center ......... 52.41 34.54 47.59 65.46
Manteca Marketplace .............. 58.20 52.45 41.80 47.55
Monterey Plaza ................... 56.37 29.88 43.63 70.12
Rosewood Village ................. - - 100.00 100.00
Westwood Village Shopping Center . 66.76 48.71 33.24 51.29
----------------------------- ---------------------------
WEIGHTED AVERAGE ..................... 65.00% 47.69% 35.00% 52.31%
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Arlington Courtyard .............. 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00%
Chino Town Square ................ 63.29 54.21 36.71 45.79
Foothill Center .................. - - 100.00 100.00
Laurentian Center ............... 37.47 33.62 62.53 66.38
Melrose Village Plaza ............ 53.17 42.01 46.83 57.99
Palmdale Shopping Center ......... 75.79 47.55 24.21 52.45
San Dimas Marketplace ............ 46.88 39.27 53.12 60.73
Tustin Heights Shopping Center ... 62.36 40.69 37.64 59.31
Vineyard Village East ............ 57.52 42.51 42.48 57.49
----------------------------- ---------------------------
WEIGHTED AVERAGE ..................... 56.06% 44.37% 43.94% 55.63%
PACIFIC NORTHWEST
24 Hour Fitness .................. 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Bear Creek Plaza ................. 71.29 54.14 28.71 45.86
Canyon Ridge Plaza ............... 33.27 21.86 66.73 78.14
Claremont Village ................ 44.65 44.78 55.35 55.22
Hermiston Plaza .................. 72.09 38.12 27.91 61.88
Hood River Shopping Center ....... 80.05 57.16 19.95 42.84
Milwaukie Marketplace ............ 49.81 30.39 50.19 69.61
Olympia Square ................... 49.24 35.86 50.76 64.14
Olympia West Center .............. 56.65 62.26 43.35 37.74
Oregon City Shopping Center ...... 71.10 43.43 28.90 56.57
Oregon Trail Shopping Center ..... 48.65 35.69 51.35 64.31
Pacific Commons Shopping Center .. 50.43 47.92 49.57 52.08
Panther Lake ..................... 38.10 22.04 61.90 77.96
Pioneer Plaza .................... 55.10 40.64 44.90 59.36
Powell Valley Junction ........... 87.34 78.50 12.66 21.50
(1) Anchors defined as single tenants which lease 15,000 square feet or more,
non-anchors defined as tenants which lease less than 15,000 square feet.
(2) Annualized base rent for all leases in place in which tenants are in
occupancy at December 31, 1998 calculated as follows: total base rent,
calculated in accordance with GAAP, to be received during the entire term
of each lease, divided by the terms in months for such leases, multiplied
by 12.
14
17
ANCHOR TENANTS (1) NON-ANCHOR TENANTS (1)
----------------------------- ---------------------------
% % OF PROPERTY % % OF PROPERTY
OCCUPIED ANN. BASE OCCUPIED ANN. BASE
PROPERTY GLA RENT GLA RENT
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy Marketplace ................ 51.60 42.46 48.40 57.54
Shute Park Plaza ................. - - 100.00 100.00
Southgate Shopping Center ........ 58.98 45.36 41.02 54.64
Sunset Mall & Office ............. 42.57 18.77 57.43 81.23
Sunset Square .................... 75.35 54.47 24.65 45.53
Tacoma Central ................... 65.75 61.58 34.25 38.42
Tanasbourne Village .............. 47.62 30.87 52.38 69.13
----------------------------- ---------------------------
WEIGHTED AVERAGE 59.09% 43.47% 40.91% 56.53%
NEVADA
Cheyenne Commons ................. 67.56% 45.22% 32.44% 54.78%
Green Valley Town & Country ...... 38.62 21.74 61.38 78.26
Mira Loma ........................ 64.61 52.53 35.39 47.47
Rainbow Promenade ................ 65.13 55.75 34.87 44.25
Sahara Pavilion North ............ 48.49 29.36 51.51 70.64
Sahara Pavilion South ............ 59.51 39.27 40.49 60.73
Winterwood Pavilion .............. 55.90 32.71 44.10 67.29
----------------------------- ---------------------------
WEIGHTED AVERAGE 57.99% 39.83% 42.01% 60.17%
OTHER
Country Club Center .............. 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00%
Jumbo Sports ..................... - - 100.00 100.00
Maysville Market Square .......... 65.63 60.33 34.37 39.67
Ocoee Plaza ...................... 47.85 45.71 52.15 54.29
----------------------------- ---------------------------
WEIGHTED AVERAGE 40.60% 31.22% 59.40% 68.78%
----------------------------- ---------------------------
PORTFOLIO WEIGHTED AVERAGE ....... 58.95% 43.25% 41.05% 56.75%
============================= ===========================
(1) Anchors defined as single tenants which lease 15,000 square feet or more,
non-anchors defined as tenants which lease less than 15,000 square feet.
(2) Annualized base rent for all leases in place in which tenants are in
occupancy at December 31, 1998 calculated as follows: total base rent,
calculated in accordance with GAAP, to be received during the entire term
of each lease, divided by the terms in months for such leases, multiplied
by 12.
15
18
MAJOR TENANTS
The following table summarizes certain information regarding tenants which
individually accounted for 1.0% or more of the annualized base rent at December
31, 1998.
ANNUALIZED BASE RENT IN PLACE AT 12/31/98
---------------------------------------------
LEASED GLA % OF TOTAL TOTAL ANN. BASE % OF TOTAL
NUMBER OF AS OF 12/31/98 LEASED ANN. BASE RENT/SQ. FT. ANN. BASE
TENANT LEASES (SQ. FT.) GLA RENT ($) (1) ($) (2) RENT
- -------------------- ---------- -------------- ---------- ------------ ----------- ----------
Wal-Mart 3 316,588 4.63% $2,836,372 $8.96 3.85%
Lucky/Albertson's/Sav-On(3) 9 344,107 5.04 2,177,727 6.33 2.96
24 Hour Fitness 4 125,675 1.84 1,713,238 13.63 2.33
Vons/Safeway 6 292,756 4.28 1,636,988 5.59 2.22
Rite Aid 12 268,674 3.93 1,363,664 5.08 1.85
United Artists Theatre 2 88,196 1.29 1,361,109 15.43 1.85
Office Max, Inc. 4 111,050 1.63 1,192,212 10.74 1.62
Ross Dress for Less 5 126,393 1.85 1,042,254 8.25 1.41
Barnes & Noble 3 70,573 1.03 999,250 14.16 1.36
---------- ------------- ---------- ------------ ----------- ---------
TOTAL 48 1,744,012 25.52% $14,322,814 $8.21 19.45%
========== ============= ========== ============ =========== =========
(1) Annualized base rent for all leases in place at December 31, 1998
calculated as follows: total base rent, calculated in accordance with
GAAP, to be received during the entire term of each lease, divided by the
terms in months for such leases, multiplied by 12.
(2) Annualized base rent divided by, gross leasable area at December 31, 1998.
(3) Combination of Lucky, Albertson's and Sav-On is pro-forma and anticipates
their proposed merger is completed.
16
19
LEASE EXPIRATIONS
The following schedules set forth certain information regarding lease
expirations for the properties for each of the ten years beginning with 1998,
assuming that none of the tenants exercise renewal options or termination
rights, if any, at or prior to the scheduled expirations.
LEASE EXPIRATION ANALYSIS
ALL LEASES
ANNUALIZED BASE RENT IN PLACE AT 12/31/98
-----------------------------------------------
LEASE NUMBER OF GLA UNDER TOTAL ANN. ANN. BASE
EXPIRATION LEASES EXPIRING % OF BASE RENT ($) % OF ANN. RENT
TENANT YEAR EXPIRING LEASES(SQ.FT.) GLA (2) BASE RENT ($/SQ. FT)(3)
- ------ ---------- --------- --------------- ------ ------------- --------- -------------
1............... 1999 149 492,858 7.21 4,740,855 6.43 9.62
2............... 2000 207 628,661 9.20 7,831,378 10.63 12.46
3............... 2001 204 642,880 9.41 7,354,458 9.98 11.44
4............... 2002 178 542,870 7.94 7,200,510 9.77 13.26
5............... 2003 159 637,508 9.33 7,252,654 9.84 11.38
6............... 2004 46 329,757 4.83 2,840,375 3.86 8.61
7............... 2005 35 351,038 5.14 3,704,093 5.03 10.55
8............... 2006 27 337,720 4.94 3,744,394 5.08 11.09
9............... 2007 30 220,145 3.22 2,615,649 3.55 11.88
10.............. 2008 29 421,810 6.17 3,660,683 4.97 8.68
11 and after 2009+ 100 2,228,015 32.61 22,740,417 30.86 10.21
----- --------- ------ ----------- ------ ------
TOTAL/WEIGHTED AVERAGE 1,164 6,833,262 100.00% $73,685,466 100.00% $10.78
===== ========= ====== =========== ====== ======
ALL ANCHOR LEASES(1)
ANNUALIZED BASE RENT IN PLACE AT 12/31/98
-----------------------------------------------
LEASE NUMBER OF GLA UNDER TOTAL ANN. ANN. BASE
EXPIRATION LEASES EXPIRING % OF BASE RENT ($) % OF ANN. RENT
TENANT YEAR EXPIRING LEASES(SQ.FT.) GLA (2) BASE RENT ($/SQ. FT)(3)
- ------ ---------- --------- --------------- ------ ------------- --------- -------------
1............... 1999 5 184,371 4.58 670,605 2.10 3.64
2............... 2000 9 199,112 4.94 1,392,470 4.37 6.99
3............... 2001 8 203,421 5.05 980,622 3.08 4.82
4............... 2002 4 127,202 3.16 796,701 2.50 6.26
5............... 2003 9 230,239 5.72 1,604,019 5.03 6.97
6............... 2004 5 159,139 3.95 701,434 2.20 4.41
7............... 2005 10 244,772 6.08 1,993,662 6.26 8.14
8............... 2006 5 216,091 5.36 2,124,944 6.67 9.83
9............... 2007 5 111,730 2.77 870,137 2.73 7.79
10.............. 2008 7 323,070 8.02 2,036,271 6.39 6.30
11 and after.... 2009+ 53 2,028,841 50.37 18,698,930 58.67 9.22
----- --------- ------ ----------- ------ ------
TOTAL/WEIGHTED AVERAGE 120 4,027,988 100.00% $31,870,395 100.00% $ 7.91
===== ========= ====== =========== ====== ======
Note: Number of Leases expiring does not include tenants on a month-to-month
agreement, whose combined occupancy totals 47,043 sq. ft.
(1) The company defines anchors as single tenants which lease 15,000 square feet
or more, non-anchors defined as tenants which lease less than 15,000 square
feet.
(2) Annualized base rent for all leases in place at December 31, 1998 calculated
as follows: total base rent, calculated in accordance with GAAP, to be
received during the entire term of each lease, divided by the terms in
months for such leases, multiplied by 12.
(3) Annualized base rent divided by gross leasable area at December 31, 1998.
17
20
ALL NON-ANCHOR LEASES(1)
ANNUALIZED BASE RENT IN PLACE AT 12/31/98
------------------------------------------------
LEASE NUMBER OF GLA UNDER TOTAL ANN. ANN. BASE
EXPIRATION LEASES EXPIRING % OF BASE RENT ($) % OF ANN. RENT
TENANT YEAR EXPIRING LEASES(SQ.FT.) GLA (2) BASE RENT ($/SQ. FT.)(3)
- ------ ---------- --------- --------------- --------- ------------- --------- --------------
1 ....................... 1999 144 308,487 11.00 4,070,250 9.73 13.19
2 ....................... 2000 198 429,549 15.31 6,438,909 15.40 14.99
3 ....................... 2001 196 439,459 15.66 6,373,837 15.24 14.50
4 ....................... 2002 174 415,668 14.82 6,403,809 15.31 15.41
5 ....................... 2003 150 407,269 14.52 5,648,036 13.51 13.87
6 ....................... 2004 41 170,618 6.08 2,138,941 5.12 12.54
7 ....................... 2005 25 106,266 3.79 1,710,432 4.09 16.10
8 ....................... 2006 22 121,629 4.34 1,619,451 3.87 13.31
9 ....................... 2007 25 108,415 3.86 1,745,512 4.17 16.10
10....................... 2008 22 98,740 3.52 1,624,412 3.89 16.45
11 and after............. 2009 + 47 199,174 7.10 4,041,486 9.67 20.29
--------- --------------- --------- ------------- --------- -------------
TOTAL/WEIGHTED AVERAGE 1,044 2,805,274 100.00% $41,815,075 100.00% $14.91
========= =============== ========= ============= ========= =============
Note: Number of Leases expiring does not include tenants on a month-to-month
agreement, whose combined occupancy totals 47,043 sq. ft.
(1) The company defines anchors as single tenants which lease 15,000 square
feet or more, non-anchors defined as tenants which lease less than 15,000
square feet.
(2) Annualized base rent for all leases in place at December 31, 1998
calculated as follows: total base rent, calculated in accordance with
GAAP, to be received during the entire term of each lease, divided by the
terms in months for such leases, multiplied by 12.
(3) Annualized base rent divided by gross leasable area at December 31, 1998.
18
21
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is a party to legal proceedings that arise in the normal
course of business, which matters are generally covered by insurance. The
resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty. However, in the
opinion of management, based upon currently available information, liability
under such proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will not have a
materially adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements
taken as a whole.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
During the fourth quarter of 1998, no matters were submitted to a vote of
stockholders of the Company.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The Company's common stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange
("NYSE") on August 8, 1997, under the symbol "PNP". On March 4, 1999 the Company
had approximately 45 stockholders of record and approximately 2,700 beneficial
owners. The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and
low sales prices as reported by the NYSE and the distributions declared by the
Company.
DISTRIBUTIONS
HIGH LOW DECLARED
------- ------- -------------
Third Quarter 1997 (from August 8, 1997) $20.750 $19.750 $0.2128
Fourth Quarter 1997 $22.000 $19.875 $0.3625
First Quarter 1998 $22.562 $21.375 $0.3800
Second Quarter 1998 $22.750 $19.375 $0.3800
Third Quarter 1998 $22.000 $16.500 $0.3800
Fourth Quarter 1998 $20.500 $17.562 $0.3800
The fourth quarter 1998 distribution on an annualized basis amounts to
$1.52 per share. All distributions will be made by the Company at the discretion
of the Board of Directors and will depend upon the earnings of the Company, its
financial condition and such other factors as the Board of Directors deem
relevant. In order to qualify for the beneficial tax treatment accorded to real
estate investment trusts under the Code, the Company is required to make
distributions to holders of its shares in an amount at least equal to 95% of the
Company's "real estate investment trust taxable income," as defined in Section
857 of the Code.
19
22
ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the Company on
a historical basis. The following data should be read in connection with
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto located
elsewhere in this report.
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA (1)
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE INFORMATION)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Total revenue ................................... $ 79,253 $ 46,710 $ 35,623 $ 30,767 $ 27,078
Operating and general and administrative
expenses ..................................... 19,765 14,216 12,766 12,775 12,810
Depreciation and amortization ................... 14,298 8,928 7,693 6,340 6,129
Interest expense ................................ 18,295 14,057 14,671 12,262 11,405
Income (loss) before extraordinary item ......... 26,634 9,356 449 (615) (3,216)
Net income (loss) ............................... 26,634 8,313 449 (615) (3,216)
Per share data:
Income before extraordinary item-diluted (2) 1.35 0.55 -- -- --
Net income-diluted (2) ..................... 1.35 0.49 -- -- --
Distributions declared ..................... 1.52 0.58 -- -- --
AS OF DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Properties, net ........... $667,478 $455,514 $264,017 $251,423 $214,554
Total assets .............. 705,541 487,220 293,186 275,690 247,101
Notes payable ............. 144,024 108,316 192,915 191,302 160,465
Line of credit payable .... 138,500 62,450 -- -- --
Advances from related party -- -- 32,113 16,482 10,790
Minority interest ......... 17,318 1,521 1,539 1,347 1,373
Stockholders' equity ...... 383,088 301,055 -- -- --
Owner's equity ............ -- -- 61,808 61,359 61,974
(1) The financial data as of the dates and for the periods prior to August 13,
1997 represents the combined financial data of Pan Pacific Development
Properties. See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.
(2) The 1997 data is calculated as if the shares were outstanding for the
entire year based on the diluted number of shares assumed to be
outstanding (see Note 2(i) to the consolidated financial statements). The
years prior to 1997 had no outstanding shares of common stock and
therefore the information is not relevant or included here.
20
23
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
The following discussion should be read in connection with the
consolidated financial statements of Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the "Company"), and the notes thereto, appearing elsewhere in this
report.
The Company receives income primarily from rental revenue (including
recoveries from tenants) from shopping center properties. As a result of the
Company's acquisition and development program, the financial data show increases
in total revenue from period to period, largely attributable to: (i)
acquisitions; and (ii) a development property placed into operation during 1997.
The Company has experienced economies of scale as it has grown its
portfolio from 25 properties, at the initial pubic offering ("IPO") in August
1997, to 54 properties at December 31, 1998. For example, the Company has
experienced a decrease in overhead costs as a percentage of total revenue. As
another example, during the year ended December 31, 1998, the Company owned
properties comprising a weighted average GLA of 6,026,000 square feet. Total
expenses, excluding interest, depreciation and amortization for the year ended
December 31, 1998 were $19,765,000 or $3.28 per square foot. By comparison,
during the year ended December 31, 1997, the Company owned properties comprising
a weighted average GLA of 3,581,000 square feet. Total expenses, excluding
interest, depreciation and amortization, for the year ended December 31, 1997
were $14,216,000 or $3.97 per square foot.
The Company expects that the more significant part of its revenue growth
in the next year or two will come from additional acquisitions and rent
increases from re-leasing and re-tenanting initiatives, the benefit of the
stabilization of the properties acquired during 1998 and the revenue generated
from expanded GLA due to the buildout of outparcels.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 1998 to the Year Ended December
31, 1997.
Total revenue increased by $32,543,000 or 69.7% to $79,253,000 for the
year ended December 31, 1998 as compared to $46,710,000 for the year ended
December 31, 1997.
Rental revenue increased by $26,096,000 or 70.3% to $63,213,000 from
$37,117,000 for the year ended December 31, 1998, compared to the year ended
December 31, 1997. The increase in rental revenue resulted principally from the
acquisition of San Dimas Marketplace and Bear Creek Plaza in January 1998,
Milwaukie Marketplace, Pioneer Plaza, Powell Valley Junction and Shute Park
Plaza in February 1998, Manteca Marketplace in March 1998, a 24 Hour Fitness
building, Panther Lake Shopping Center and Creekside Center in April 1998,
Westwood Village Shopping Center and Fashion Faire Shopping Center in May 1998,
Pacific Commons Shopping Center in June 1998, Oregon Trail, Hermiston Plaza and
Hood River Center in October 1998, and Sandy Marketplace, Southgate Center,
Oregon City Shopping Center, Sunset Mall, Mira Loma Shopping Center and Glen
Cove Center in November 1998 (collectively, the "1998 Acquisitions") and the
benefit of a full year of rental revenue from the acquisition of Chico
Crossroads in February 1997, Monterey Plaza in April 1997, Fairmont Shopping
Center in May 1997, Lakewood Shopping Center in June 1997, Green Valley Town &
Country in August 1997, Rainbow Promenade in September 1997, Claremont Village,
Olympia West Center and Tacoma Central in November 1997, Tustin Heights,
Palmdale Center and Brookvale Center in December 1997 and the inclusion in
operations of Laguna Village Phase II in the third quarter of 1997
(collectively, the "1997 Acquisitions").
Recoveries from tenants increased by $5,686,000 or 70.7% to $13,728,000
for the year ended December 31, 1998, compared to $8,042,000, for the year ended
December 31, 1997. This increase resulted primarily from the 1998 Acquisitions
and the 1997 Acquisitions. Recoveries from tenants were 88.3% of property
operating expenses and property taxes for the year ended December 31, 1998 as
compared to 86.2% of the same expenses for the same period in 1997.
21
24
Property expenses include property operating expenses and property taxes.
Property operating expenses increased by $3,671,000 or 59.8% from $6,142,000 to
$9,813,000 for the year ended December 31, 1998, compared to the year ended
December 31, 1997. The increase in property operating expenses was primarily
attributable to the 1998 Acquisitions and the 1997 Acquisitions. Property taxes
increased by $2,548,000 or 80.0% for the year ended December 31, 1998, compared
to the year ended December 31, 1997. The increase in property taxes was also
primarily the result of the 1998 Acquisitions and the 1997 Acquisitions.
Depreciation and amortization increased by $5,370,000 or 60.2% to
$14,298,000 from $8,928,000 for the year ended December 31, 1998 compared to the
year ended December 31, 1997. This was primarily due to the 1998 Acquisitions,
the 1997 Acquisitions and amortization for current year additions of tenant
improvements and leasing commissions.
Interest expense increased by $4,238,000 or 30.2% to $18,295,000 from
$14,057,000 for the year ended December 31, 1998, compared to the year ended
December 31, 1997, primarily as a result of interest expense relating to amounts
drawn on the Company's unsecured credit facility (the "Unsecured Credit
Facility") to finance acquisitions, interest expense related to the assumption
of fixed rate mortgages on Tacoma Central and Olympia West in the fourth quarter
of 1997, interest expense on the fixed rate mortgage assumed related to Westwood
Village Shopping Center in the second quarter of 1998 as well as interest
expense on the fixed rate mortgages assumed related to Sunset Mall, Oregon City
Shopping Center, Sandy Marketplace and Southgate Center in the fourth quarter of
1998. These increases were offset by decreases in interest expense related to
the repayment of debt of approximately $134,000,000 in August 1997 in connection
with the Company's IPO and approximately $82,000,000 in May 1998 in connection
with the Company's secondary offering.
General and administrative expenses increased by $186,000 or 4.7% to
$4,109,000 from $3,923,000 for the year ended December 31, 1998, compared to the
year ended December 31, 1997. This increase was primarily attributable to annual
salary increases and costs associated with additional staffing necessitated by
the acquisitions. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in the
management fee paid to Revenue Properties Company Limited ("RPC") as that fee is
no longer being charged effective with the completion of the IPO. As a
percentage of total revenue, general and administrative expenses were 5.2% and
8.4% for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
Other expenses consist primarily of loan guaranty fees and the expensing
of due diligence costs for acquisitions that are not completed. Other expenses
decreased by $856,000 or 88.8% to $108,000 from $964,000 for the year ended
December 31, 1998, compared to the year ended December 31, 1997. The decrease
was primarily due to loan guaranty fees paid to RPC which are no longer being
charged as the debt which was guaranteed was paid off in August 1997 in
connection with the IPO.
In 1997, as part of the Formation Transactions (see Note 1 to the
consolidated financial statements located elsewhere in this report),
$134,217,000 of notes payable were repaid. In connection with the early payoff
of these notes, an extraordinary loss of $1,043,000 was recorded which included
prepayment penalties and the write-off of unamortized financing costs and loan
premium.
22
25
The following table compares the operating data for the 19 properties
("Same Properties") that were owned and in operation for the entirety of both
years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997:
1998 1997
----------- -----------
Revenue:
Rental .............................. $28,804,000 $28,462,000
Recoveries from tenants ............. 7,798,000 7,597,000
Operating income from unconsolidated
partnerships ..................... 948,000 887,000
Other ............................... 383,000 485,000
----------- -----------
$37,933,000 $37,431,000
Operating expenses:
Property operating and property taxes 8,539,000 8,653,000
----------- -----------
Operating income ....................... $29,394,000 $28,778,000
=========== ===========
Operating income for the Same Properties for the year ended December 31,
1998 increased over the same period in the prior year by $616,000 or 2.1%. This
increase was attributable to increased rental revenue due to increased occupancy
levels primarily at Cheyenne Commons and Chino Town Square. This increase was
offset by a decrease in other income primarily due to termination fees recorded
in 1997 at Sunset Square. Operating expenses for these Same Properties decreased
by $114,000 or 1.3% primarily due to bad debt expense in 1997 at Sunset Square.
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 1997 to the Year Ended December
31, 1996.
Total revenue increased by $11,087,000 or 31.1% to $46,710,000 for the
year ended December 31, 1997 as compared to $35,623,000 for the year ended
December 31, 1996.
Rental revenue increased by $8,767,000 or 30.9% to $37,117,000 from
$28,350,000 for the year ended December 31, 1997, compared to the year ended
December 31, 1996. The increase in rental revenue resulted principally from the
1997 Acquisitions. In addition, the inclusion in operations of Laguna Village
Phase I in May 1996 added to this increase. Rental revenue also increased as a
result of increased occupancy levels, primarily at Canyon Ridge Plaza, Sahara
Pavilion North, Chino Town Square and Tanasbourne Village.
Recoveries from tenants increased by $1,828,000 or 29.4% to $8,042,000 for
the year ended December 31, 1997, compared to $6,214,000, for the year ended
December 31, 1996. This increase resulted primarily from the 1997 Acquisitions.
In addition, 1997 included a full year of recoveries for Laguna Village Phase I.
Recoveries from tenants were 86.2% of property operating expenses and property
taxes for the year ended December 31, 1997 as compared to 84.4% of the same
expenses for the same period in 1996.
Property expenses include property operating expenses and property taxes.
Property operating expenses increased by $1,021,000 or 19.9% from $5,121,000 to
$6,142,000 for the year ended December 31, 1997, compared to the year ended
December 31, 1996. The increase in property operating expenses was primarily
attributable to the 1997 Acquisitions. In addition, 1997 included a full year of
property operating expenses for Laguna Village Phase I. Property taxes increased
by $943,000 or 42.0% for the year ended December 31, 1997, compared to the year
ended December 31, 1996. The increase in property taxes was primarily the result
of the completion of Laguna Village Phase I in 1996 and the 1997 Acquisitions.
Depreciation and amortization increased by $1,235,000 or 16.1% to
$8,928,000 from $7,693,000 for the year ended December 31, 1997 compared to the
year ended December 31, 1996. This was primarily due to the May 1996 completion
of Laguna Village Phase I and the 1997 Acquisitions.
Interest expense decreased by $614,000 or 4.2% to $14,057,000 from
$14,671,000 for the year ended December 31, 1997, compared to the year ended
December 31, 1996, primarily as a result of decreased interest expense relating
to the repayment of debt of approximately $134,000,000 in August 1997 in
connection with the Company's
23
26
IPO. This decrease was partially offset by interest expense related to the debt
assumed pursuant to the acquisition of Monterey Plaza in April 1997 which was
subsequently repaid in August 1997, the interest expense associated with the
Unsecured Credit Facility, the net impact of the December 1996 refinancing of
variable rate debt to fixed rate debt and construction loan interest related to
the development of Laguna Village Phase I.
General and administrative expenses increased by $695,000 or 21.5% to
$3,923,000 from $3,228,000 for the year ended December 31, 1997, compared to the
year ended December 31, 1996. This increase was primarily attributable to annual
salary increases and costs associated with additional staffing necessitated by
the 1997 Acquisitions. Expenses for tax and audit services were also increased
as a result of new public reporting requirements. These increases were partially
offset by a decrease in the management fee paid to RPC as that fee is no longer
being charged effective with the completion of the IPO. As a percentage of total
revenue, general and administrative expenses were 8.4% and 9.1% for the years
ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively. The Company expects that general
and administrative expenses will continue to decrease as a percentage of total
revenue in future periods due to economies of scale which the Company
anticipates should be realized as additional properties are acquired.
Other expenses consist primarily of loan guaranty fees and the expensing
of due diligence costs for acquisitions that are not completed. Other expenses
decreased by $1,209,000 or 55.6% to $964,000 from $2,173,000 for the year ended
December 31, 1997, compared to the year ended December 31, 1996. The decrease
was primarily due to loan guaranty fees paid to RPC which are no longer being
charged as the debt which was guaranteed was paid off in August 1997 in
connection with the IPO. This decrease was partially offset by the expensing of
due diligence costs in 1997 related to potential acquisitions which were not
consummated.
As part of the Formation Transactions (see Note 1 to the consolidated
financial statements located elsewhere in this report), $134,217,000 of notes
payable were repaid. In connection with the early payoff of these notes, an
extraordinary loss of $1,043,000 was recorded which included prepayment
penalties and the write-off of unamortized financing costs and loan premium.
The following table compares the operating data for the 19 properties
("Same Properties") that were owned and in operation for the entirety of both
years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996:
1997 1996
----------- -----------
Revenue:
Rental .............................. $28,462,000 $27,757,000
Recoveries from tenants ............. 7,597,000 6,908,000
Operating income from unconsolidated 887,000 871,000
partnerships
Other ............................... 485,000 432,000
----------- -----------
$37,431,000 $35,968,000
Operating expenses:
Property operating and property taxes 8,653,000 8,335,000
----------- -----------
Operating income ....................... $28,778,000 $27,633,000
=========== ===========
Operating income for the Same Properties for the year ended December 31,
1997 increased over the same period in the prior year by $1,145,000 or 4.1%.
This increase was attributable to increased rental revenue due to increased
occupancy levels primarily at Canyon Ridge Plaza, Cheyenne Commons, Sahara
Pavilion North, Chino Town Square and Tanasbourne Village. In addition, there
were approximately $153,000 of lease termination fees received at Canyon Ridge
Plaza and Sahara Pavilion North in 1997. Property operating expenses for these
Same Properties increased by $318,000 or 3.8% for the year ended December 31,
1997, over the same period in the prior year due primarily to increased property
tax expense and center enhancement costs such as painting, new awnings, signage
and landscaping at Cheyenne Commons as well as increased bad debt expense at
Sunset Square.
24
27
FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS
The White Paper on Funds from Operations approved by the Board of
Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts in March
1995 (the "White Paper") defines Funds from Operations as net income (loss)
(computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from debt
restructuring and sales of property, plus real estate related depreciation and
amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint
ventures. Management considers Funds from Operations an appropriate measure of
performance of an equity REIT because it is predicated on cash flow analyses.
The Company computes Funds from Operations in accordance with standards
established by the White Paper. The Company's computation of Funds from
Operations may, however, differ from the methodology for calculating Funds from
Operations utilized by other equity REITs and, therefore, may not be comparable
to such other REITs. Funds from Operations should not be considered as an
alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of
the Company's liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund the
Company's cash needs, including its ability to make distributions.
The following table presents the Company's actual Funds from Operations
for the year ended December 31, 1998 and actual and pro forma Funds from
Operations for the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996 (see Note 12 to the
consolidated financial statements located elsewhere in this report for an
explanation of pro forma adjustments):
DECEMBER 31,
1998 DECEMBER 31, 1997 DECEMBER 31, 1996
------------ ------------------------------- -------------------------------
ACTUAL ACTUAL PRO FORMA ACTUAL PRO FORMA
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Net income ....................... $ 26,634,000 $ 8,313,000 $ 17,537,000 $ 449,000 $ 16,361,000
Add:
Extraordinary loss ............ -- 1,043,000 -- -- --
Depreciation and amortization . 14,298,000 8,928,000 9,484,000 7,693,000 8,738,000
Depreciation of unconsolidated
partnerships ............... 211,000 208,000 208,000 214,000 214,000
Depreciation of non-real estate
corporate assets ........... (220,000) (204,000) (204,000) (174,000) (174,000)
Minority interest in PPP LLC .. 211,000 -- -- -- --
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Funds from Operations ............ $ 41,134,000 $ 18,288,000 $ 27,025,000 $ 8,182,000 $ 25,139,000
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Weighted average number of shares
of common stock outstanding
(assuming dilution) ........... 19,662,622 16,866,173 -- -- --
Number of shares of common stock
assumed to be outstanding ..... -- -- 16,814,012 -- 16,814,012
CASH FLOWS
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 1998 to the Year Ended December
31, 1997.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $24,121,000 to
$39,363,000 for the year ended December 31, 1998, as compared to $15,242,000 for
the year ended December 31, 1997. The increase was primarily the result of an
increase in operating income due to property acquisitions.
Net cash used in investing activities increased by $527,000 to
$166,803,000 for the year ended December 31, 1998, compared to $166,276,000 for
the year ended December 31, 1997. The increase was primarily the result of
additions to properties for the 1998 Acquisitions, offset by contributions to
unconsolidated partnerships in 1997.
Net cash provided by financing activities decreased by $12,600,000 to
$130,199,000 for the year ended December 31, 1998, compared to $142,799,000 for
the year ended December 31, 1997. The decrease primarily resulted from a
decrease in notes payable payments, offset by a decrease in advances from
related party, a decrease in issuance of common stock and an increase in
distributions paid.
25
28
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 1997 to the Year Ended December
31, 1996.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $8,749,000 to
$15,242,000 for the year ended December 31, 1997, as compared to $6,493,000 for
the year ended December 31, 1996. The increase was primarily the result of an
increase in operating income due to property acquisitions.
Net cash used in investing activities increased by $147,474,000 to
$166,276,000 for the year ended December 31, 1997, compared to $18,802,000 for
the year ended December 31, 1996. The increase was primarily the result of
additions to properties for the 1997 Acquisitions. The increase was also
attributable to contributions to unconsolidated partnerships. In the comparable
period in 1996, the use of cash for investing activities was primarily for the
purpose of acquiring the remaining ownership interests in Laurentian Center and
additions to property under development.
Net cash provided by financing activities increased by $127,833,000 to
$142,799,000 for the year ended December 31, 1997, compared to $14,966,000 for
the year ended December 31, 1996. The increase resulted from amounts drawn on
the Company's unsecured line of credit, net proceeds of the IPO including the
full exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option and increases in
advances from RPC (see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements located
elsewhere in this report) prior to the IPO for certain of the 1997 Acquisitions.
These increases were partially offset by notes payable payments reflecting the
paydown of a significant amount of portfolio debt in connection with the IPO.
YEAR 2000 ISSUE
The Year 2000 issue is the result of computer programs being written using
two digits rather than four to define the applicable year. Computer systems,
software and devices with embedded technology that are date-sensitive may
recognize a date using "00" as the year 1900 rather than the year 2000. This
could result in system failures, miscalculations or disruptions in operations,
including, among other things, a temporary inability to process transactions or
engage in similar normal business activities.
The Company has conducted an assessment of how it may be impacted by the
Year 2000 issue and is implementing a comprehensive plan to address all known
aspects of the issue.
Based on the Company's assessment of its internal computer systems
(including related hardware, software, customized applications and network
systems) with respect to the Year 2000 issue, the Company determined that its
existing network and IBM AS400 operating systems were not Year 2000 compliant.
Accordingly, the Company recently replaced its network operating system with a
new operating system and expects to complete a conversion to a new software
package, which does not run on the IBM AS400 but on a Year 2000 compliant NT
platform, by June 30, 1999. The Company believes that these measures, the actual
and estimated costs of which have been and are expected to continue to be
immaterial in the aggregate, will enable its internal computer systems to be
Year 2000 compliant.
The Company is also reviewing the efforts of its significant tenants,
vendors and other service providers to become Year 2000 compliant. Letters and
questionnaires have been or are in the process of being sent to all critical
entities with which the Company does business to assess their Year 2000
readiness. The Company will review the responses to such letters and
questionnaires, assess the impact that the Year 2000 readiness status of such
entities may have on the Company's operations, and take whatever action is
deemed necessary. Based on responses received to date, there has been no
indication that the respondents have any material concerns related to their
ability to address all of their known significant Year 2000 issues on a timely
basis. The Company anticipates that these review activities will be on-going for
1999 and will include any necessary follow-up efforts. The Company, however,
cannot presently estimate the total cost of this phase of its Year 2000
readiness program. Although the review of such entities is continuing, the
Company is not currently aware of any third party circumstances with respect to
the Year 2000 issue that may have a material adverse impact on the Company. The
Company can provide no assurance that the Year 2000 compliance plans of such
third parties will be successfully completed in a timely manner.
26
29
Based on the results to date of the Company's internal assessment and
external inquiries, the Company does not believe that the Year 2000 issue will
pose significant operational problems for the Company or otherwise have a
material adverse effect on its results of operations or financial position.
Although management believes it has undertaken a careful and thorough analysis,
if all Year 2000 issues are not properly identified, or assessment, remediation
and testing efforts are not completed in a timely manner with respect to the
problems that are identified, there can be no assurance that the Year 2000 issue
will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations
or adversely affect the Company's relationships with tenants, vendors and other
service providers. Further, management believes it has undertaken a careful
survey of third party entities and does not believe there to be a material
concern based upon the potential third party risks that have been identified,
however, there can be no assurance that the Year 2000 issues of these other
entities will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of
operations. A contingency plan has not yet been developed for dealing with the
most reasonably likely worst case scenario resulting from the Year 2000 issues
as such scenario has not yet been clearly identified.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company believes the IPO and related Formation Transactions that were
completed in August 1997 and the secondary offering which was completed in May
1998 improved its financial position through changes to its capital structure,
which principally included a substantial reduction of its overall debt and its
debt-to-equity ratio. In connection with the Formation Transactions, the Company
repaid all of its existing floating rate mortgage debt. As a result, the total
principal amount of outstanding secured debt after the Formation Transactions
and the acquisition of Green Valley Town & Country was reduced by approximately
$146,000,000. In connection with the secondary offering, the Unsecured Credit
Facility was paid down by approximately $82,000,000. These transactions resulted
in a significant reduction in interest expense as a percentage of total revenue,
23.1% for the year ended December 31, 1998 and 30.1% for the year ended December
31, 1997. Thus, cash from operations needed to fund debt service requirements
was substantially decreased.
The total market capitalization of the Company at December 31, 1998, was
approximately $721,042,000, based on the market closing price at December 31,
1998 of $19.9375 per share (assuming the conversion of PPP LLC's 832,617 units)
and the debt outstanding of approximately $282,524,000 (exclusive of accounts
payable and accrued expenses). As a result, the Company's debt to total market
capitalization ratio was approximately 39.2% at December 31, 1998. On May 18,
1998 the Company closed its secondary equity offering of 4,348,000 shares of
common stock which included the partial exercise of the underwriters' over
allotment option. The Company believes that its capital structure combined with
its Unsecured Credit Facility enhances the Company's ability to take advantage
of acquisition opportunities as well as to provide funds for general corporate
purposes.
In March 1998, the Company obtained an increase to its Unsecured Credit
Facility from $150,000,000 to $200,000,000 and a reduction in the borrowing rate
thereunder to LIBOR plus 1.375% (which rate is reduced to LIBOR plus 1.25% for
as long as the Company's debt-to-book value ratio is .30 or below). The Company
had $61,500,000 available under the Unsecured Credit Facility at December 31,
1998. At the Company's option, amounts borrowed under the Unsecured Credit
Facility bear interest at either LIBOR plus 1.375% or a reference rate. The
weighted average interest rate for amounts borrowed under the Unsecured Credit
Facility at December 31, 1998 was 6.58%. The Company anticipates that the
Unsecured Credit Facility will continue to be used primarily to acquire
additional properties and for general corporate purposes.
The Company's indebtedness outstanding at December 31, 1998 requires
balloon payments of $7,700,000 in 1999, $168,559,000 in 2000, $4,004,000 in
2004, $7,443,000 in 2005, and $67,491,000 in 2007. The balloon payments due in
the year 2000 include the balance drawn on the Unsecured Credit Facility at
December 31, 1998 of $138,500,000. It is likely that the Company will not have
sufficient funds on hand to repay these balloon amounts at maturity. Therefore,
the Company expects to refinance such debt either through additional debt
financings secured by individual properties or groups of properties, by
unsecured private or public debt offerings or by additional equity offerings. At
December 31, 1998, 40 of the Company's 54 properties remained unencumbered. The
Unsecured Credit Facility, which matures in 2000, is renewable, subject to
certain conditions.
27
30
The Company expects to make distributions from cash available for
distributions, which the Company believes will exceed historical cash available
for distributions due to the reduction in debt service resulting from the
repayments of indebtedness described above and from the net cash flows from
acquired properties. Amounts accumulated for distributions will be invested by
the Company primarily in short-term investments such as collateralized
securities of the United States government or its agencies, high-grade
commercial paper and bank deposits or will be used to pay down outstanding
balances on the Unsecured Credit Facility, if any.
The following table provides historical distribution information:
Distribution
Quarter Ended Date Declared Record Date Date Paid Per Share
------------- ------------- ----------- --------- ------------
September 30, 1997 October 6, 1997 October 22, 1997 October 31, 1997 $0.2128
December 31, 1997 December 5, 1997 December 29, 1997 January 19, 1998 $0.3625
March 31, 1998 March 17, 1998 March 31, 1998 April 17, 1998 $0.3800
June 30, 1998 June 19, 1998 June 30, 1998 July 17, 1998 $0.3800
September 30, 1998 September 11, 1998 October 5, 1998 October 21, 1998 $0.3800
December 31, 1998 December 8, 1998 December 22, 1998 January 20, 1999 $0.3800
The Company expects to meet its short-term liquidity requirements
generally through its current working capital and net cash provided by
operations. The Company believes that its net cash provided by operations will
be sufficient to allow the Company to make the distributions necessary to enable
the Company to continue to qualify as a REIT. The Company also believes that the
foregoing sources of liquidity will be sufficient to fund its short-term
liquidity needs for the foreseeable future.
The Company expects to meet certain long-term liquidity requirements such
as property acquisition and development, scheduled debt maturities, renovations,
expansions and other non-recurring capital improvements through long-term
secured and unsecured indebtedness and the issuance of additional equity or debt
securities. The Company also expects to use funds available under the Unsecured
Credit Facility to finance acquisition and development activities and capital
improvements on an interim basis.
INFLATION
Substantially all of the leases provide for the recovery of real estate
taxes and operating expenses incurred by the Company. In addition, many of the
leases provide for fixed base rent increases or indexed escalations (based on
the consumer price index or other measures) and percentage rent. The Company
believes that inflationary increases in expenses will be substantially offset by
expense reimbursements, contractual rent increases and percentage rent described
above.
The Unsecured Credit Facility bears interest at a variable rate, which
will be influenced by changes in short-term interest rates, and will be
sensitive to inflation.
IMPACT OF ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS ISSUED BUT NOT ADOPTED BY THE COMPANY
In April 1998, the AICPA Accounting Standards Executive Committee issued
Statement of Position 98-5, "Reporting on the Costs of Start-Up Activities"
("SOP 98-5"). SOP 98-5 requires that costs incurred during start-up activities,
including organization costs, be expensed as incurred. SOP 98-5 is effective for
financial statements for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1998. Initial
application of SOP 98-5 should be reported as a cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle. Management believes that the adoption of SOP 98-5 will not
have a material impact on the Company.
28
31
ITEM 7a. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company is exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of
its line of credit and long-term debt used to maintain liquidity and fund
capital expenditures and expansion of the Company's real estate investment
portfolio and operations. The Company's interest rate risk management objective
is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and
to lower its overall borrowing costs. To achieve its objectives the Company
borrows primarily at fixed rates and could enter into derivative financial
instruments such as interest rate swaps, caps and treasury locks in order to
mitigate its interest rate risk on a related financial instrument. The Company
does not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative or
trading purposes.
The Company's interest rate risk is monitored using a variety of
techniques. The table below presents the principal amounts, weighted average
interest rates, fair values and other terms required by year of expected
maturity to evaluate the expected cash flows and sensitivity to interest rate
changes.
Fair
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Thereafter Total Value(3)
-------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------
Fixed rate debt (1) (2) ...... $ 2,252 $ 31,836 $ 1,812 $ 1,965 $ 2,136 $ 94,365 $ 134,366 $ 135,117
Average interest rate ........ 8.15% 8.15% 8.17% 8.17% 8.17% 8.17% 8.15% 7.61%
Variable rate LIBOR debt (1).. -- $ 138,500 -- -- -- -- $ 138,500 $ 138,500
Average interest rate ........ -- 6.58% -- -- -- -- 6.58% 6.58%
(1) Principal amounts shown are in thousands.
(2) For purposes of this disclosure, the 1999 fixed rate principal amount
excludes $7,700 as that amount was repaid on January 5, 1999.
(3) The fair value of fixed rate debt and variable rate LIBOR debt were
determined based on the current rates offered for fixed rate debt and
variable rate LIBOR debt with similar risks and maturities.
Except for the item noted in (2) above, the table incorporates only those
exposures that exist as of December 31, 1998, and does not consider those
exposures or positions which could arise after that date. Moreover, because firm
commitments are not presented in the table above, the information presented
therein has limited predictive value. As a result, the Company's interest rate
fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during the period and
interest rates.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The financial statements and supplementary data required by Regulation S-X
are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K commencing on page F-1.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
PART III
Certain information required by Part III is omitted from this annual
report on Form 10-K in that the Company will file a definitive proxy statement
within 120 days after the end of its fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A for
its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in May, 1999 (the "Proxy
Statement") and the information included therein is incorporated herein by
reference.
29
32
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information contained in the sections captioned "Proposal One;
Election of Directors" and "Compliance with Federal Securities Laws" of the
Proxy Statement are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information contained in the section captioned "Executive
Compensation" of the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information contained in the section captioned "Principal and
Management Stockholders" of the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by
reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information contained in the section captioned "Certain Relationships
and Related Transactions" of the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by
reference.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Financial Statements and Schedules
The following consolidated financial information is included as a separate
section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
1. Consolidated Financial Statements:
Page (s)
--------
Independent Auditors' Report..................................... F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1998
and 1997...................................................... F-2
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended
December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996.............................. F-3
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended
December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996.............................. F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996.............................. F-5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements....................... F-7
2. Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule:
Schedule III--Properties and Accumulated Depreciation............ F-20
30
33
3. Exhibits
Exhibit No. Description
----------- --------------------------------------------------------
3.1 Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Company
(previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Registration No.
333-28715) and incorporated herein by reference)
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (previously
filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-11 (Registration No. 333-28715) and
incorporated herein by reference)
4.1 Form of Certificate of Common Stock (previously filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form S-11 (Registration No. 333-28715) and incorporated
herein by reference)
10.1 The 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of Pan Pacific
Retail Properties, Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit
10.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
S-11 (Registration No. 333-28715) and incorporated
herein by reference)
10.2 Form of Officers and Directors Indemnification Agreement
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Registration No.
333- 28715) and incorporated herein by reference)
10.3 Form of Employment Agreement between the Company and Mr.
Stuart A. Tanz (previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11
(Registration No. 333-28715) and incorporated herein by
reference)
10.4 Form of Employment Agreement between the Company and Mr.
David L. Adlard (previously filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11
(Registration No. 333-28715) and incorporated herein by
reference)
10.5 Form of Employment Agreement between the Company and Mr.
Jeffrey S. Stauffer (previously filed as Exhibit 10.5 to
the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11
(Registration No. 333-28715) and incorporated herein by
reference)
10.6 Form of Miscellaneous Rights Agreement (previously filed
as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Registration Statement
on Form S-11 (Registration No. 333-28715) and
incorporated herein by reference)
10.7 Form of Non-Competition Agreement (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form S-11 (Registration No. 333-28715) and incorporated
herein by reference)
10.8 Purchase and Sale Agreement for Green Valley Town &
Country Shopping Center (previously filed as Exhibit
10.11 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
S-11 (Registration No. 333-28715) and incorporated
herein by reference)
10.9 Credit Agreement with Bank of America NT&SA (previously
filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's filing of Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 and
incorporated herein by reference)
31
34
Exhibit No. Description
----------- --------------------------------------------------------
10.10 Purchase and Sale Agreement for Rainbow Promenade
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's
filing of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997
and incorporated herein by reference)
10.11 Purchase and Sale Agreement for Claremont Village
Shopping Center (previously filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the
Company's filing of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.12 Purchase and Sale Agreement for Olympia West Plaza
Shopping Center (previously filed as Exhibit 10.10 to
the Company's filing of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.13 Purchase and Sale Agreement for Tacoma Central Shopping
Center (previously filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the
Company's filing of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.14 Modification Agreement to the Credit Agreement with Bank
of America NT & SA (previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to
the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11
(Registration No. 333-50125) and incorporated herein by
reference)
10.15 Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement
of Pan Pacific (Portland), LLC (previously filed as
Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed October 23,
1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.16 Purchase and Sale and Ground Lease Assignment and
Assumption Agreement and Escrow Instructions (previously
filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on
October 23, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.17 First Amendment To Purchase and Sale Ground Lease
Assignment and Assumption Agreement and Escrow
Instructions (previously filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the
Company's Form 8-K Filed October 23, 1998 and
incorporated herein by reference)
10.18 Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions
(previously filed as Exhibit 99.4 to the Company's Form
8-K filed October 23, 1998 and incorporated herein by
reference)
10.19 Contribution Agreement and Escrow Instructions by and
between Portland Fixture Limited Partnership PFMGP,
Inc., and Pan Pacific (Portland), LLC dated September
23, 1998, and related amendments (previously filed as
Exhibit 99.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed November
12, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.20 Contribution Agreement and Escrow Instructions by and
between Portland Fixture Limited Partnership,
Independent Member Corp., Byron P. Henry, Steven J.
Oliva and Pan Pacific (Portland), LLC dated September
23, 1998, and related amendments (previously filed as
Exhibit 99.3 to the Company's Form 8-K filed November
12, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.21 Form of First Amendment to Employment Agreement between
the Company and Mr. Stuart A. Tanz
10.22 Form of First Amendment to Non-Qualified Stock Option
Agreement between the Company and Mr. Stuart A. Tanz
32
35
Exhibit No. Description
----------- --------------------------------------------------------
10.23 Form of First Amendment to Incentive Stock Option
Agreement between the Company and Mr. Stuart A. Tanz
10.24 Restricted Stock Agreement between the Company and Mr.
Stuart A. Tanz
10.25 Form of First Amendment to Restricted Stock Agreement
between the Company and Mr. Stuart A. Tanz
10.26 Form of First Amendment to Employment Agreement between
the Company and Mr. Jeffrey S. Stauffer
10.27 Restricted Stock Agreement between the Company and Mr.
Jeffrey S. Stauffer
10.28 Form of First Amendment to Restricted Stock Agreement
between the Company and Mr. Jeffrey S. Stauffer
10.29 Form of First Amendment to Employment Agreement between
the Company and Mr. David L. Adlard
10.30 Restricted Stock Agreement between the Company and Mr.
David L. Adlard
10.31 Form of First Amendment to Restricted Stock Agreement
between the Company and Mr. David L. Adlard
10.32 Form of First Amendment to Non-Qualified Stock Option
Agreement for Independent Directors
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1 Consent of KPMG LLP
27.1 Financial Data Schedule (electronically filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission only)
(b) Reports on Form 8-K.
1. A Form 8-K was filed on October 23, 1998 for purposes of
reporting the acquisition of three shopping centers located in the
pacific northwest that occurred on October 9, 1998. No financial
statements or pro forma financial information were filed as it was
impracticable to do so at the time. An amended 8-K which included
the financial statements and pro forma financial information was
filed on December 21, 1998.
2. A Form 8-K was filed on November 12, 1998 for the purposes of
reporting the acquisition of four shopping centers located in the
pacific northwest that occurred on November 5, 1998 and November 9,
1998. No financial statements or pro forma financial information
were filed as it was impracticable to do so at the time. An amended
8-K which included the financial statements and pro forma financial
information was filed December 21, 1998.
33
36
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on March 19, 1999.
Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc.
By: /s/ Stuart A. Tanz By: /s/ David L. Adlard
-------------------------------- --------------------------------
Stuart A. Tanz David L. Adlard
President and Chief Executive Executive Vice President and
Officer Chief Financial Officer
By: /s/ Laurie A. Sneve
--------------------------------
Laurie A. Sneve, CPA
Vice President and Controller
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
/s/ Stuart A. Tanz Director, Chairman, Chief Executive March 19, 1999
- -------------------------------- Officer and President
Stuart A. Tanz
/s/ David L. Adlard Executive Vice President, Chief March 19, 1999
- -------------------------------- Financial Officer, Treasurer
David L. Adlard and Secretary
/s/ Laurie A. Sneve Vice President and Controller March 19, 1999
- --------------------------------
Laurie A. Sneve, CPA
/s/ Paul D. Campbell Director March 19, 1999
- --------------------------------
Paul D. Campbell
/s/ Mark J. Riedy Director March 19, 1999
- --------------------------------
Mark J. Riedy
/s/ Bernard M. Feldman Director March 19, 1999
- --------------------------------
Bernard M. Feldman
/s/ Melvin S. Adess Director March 19, 1999
- --------------------------------
Melvin S. Adess
/s/ David P. Zimel Director March 19, 1999
- --------------------------------
David P. Zimel
34
37
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Board of Directors
Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Pan
Pacific Retail Properties, Inc. and subsidiaries (see Note 1) as of December 31,
1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of income, equity and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1998. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we
also have audited the accompanying financial statement schedule III. These
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pan Pacific
Retail Properties, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and
the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial
statement schedule III, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.
KPMG LLP
San Diego, California
February 11, 1999, except as to Note 9(f),
which is as of March 24, 1999
F-1
38
PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
ASSETS: 1998 1997
------------ ------------
Operating properties, at cost:
Land $ 186,891 $ 139,959
Buildings and improvements (including related party development
and acquisition fees of $1,235) 490,874 313,483
Tenant improvements 31,757 32,148
------------ ------------
709,522 485,590
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (42,044) (30,076)
------------ ------------
667,478 455,514
Investments in unconsolidated partnerships 9,946 9,921
Cash and cash equivalents 2,759 --
Restricted cash 912 661
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$412 and $125, respectively) 2,958 1,626
Accrued rent receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$1,071 and $847, respectively) 9,643 7,620
Notes receivable 2,411 2,981
Deferred lease commissions (including unamortized related party amounts of
$2,310 and $2,236, respectively, and net of accumulated
amortization of $2,093 and $2,023, respectively) 2,955 2,683
Prepaid expenses 5,244 3,860
Other assets 1,235 2,354
------------ ------------
$ 705,541 $ 487,220
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY:
Notes payable $ 144,024 $ 108,316
Line of credit payable 138,500 62,450
Accounts payable (including related party amounts of $16 and $11,
respectively) 5,880 2,183
Accrued expenses and other liabilities (including related party amounts
of $389 and $692, respectively) 8,504 5,600
Distributions payable (including related party amounts
of $4,107 and $3,130, respectively) 8,227 6,095
------------ ------------
305,135 184,644
Minority interests 17,318 1,521
------------ ------------
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock par value $.01 per share, 100,000,000 authorized shares,
21,162,012 and 16,814,012 shares issued and outstanding
at December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively 212 168
Paid in capital in excess of par value 481,182 395,313
Accumulated deficit (98,306) (94,426)
------------ ------------
383,088 301,055
------------ ------------
$ 705,541 $ 487,220
============ ============
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-2
39
PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (NOTE 1)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ----------
REVENUE:
Base rent $ 62,585 $ 36,839 $ 28,111
Percentage rent 628 278 239
Recoveries from tenants 13,728 8,042 6,214
Income from unconsolidated partnerships 737 409 109
Other 1,575 1,142 950
---------- ---------- ----------
79,253 46,710 35,623
---------- ---------- ----------
EXPENSES:
Property operating 9,813 6,142 5,121
Property taxes 5,735 3,187 2,244
Depreciation and amortization 14,298 8,928 7,693
Interest 18,295 14,057 14,671
General and administrative 4,109 3,923 3,228
Other 108 964 2,173
---------- ---------- ----------
52,358 37,201 35,130
---------- ---------- ----------
INCOME BEFORE MINORITY INTERESTS
AND EXTRAORDINARY ITEM 26,895 9,509 493
Minority interests (261) (153) (44)
---------- ---------- ----------
INCOME BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY ITEM 26,634 9,356 449
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt -- (1,043) --
---------- ---------- ----------
NET INCOME $ 26,634 $ 8,313 $ 449
========== ========== ==========
Basic earnings per share:
Income before extraordinary item $ 1.37 $ 0.56 $ --
Extraordinary item $ -- $ (0.06) $ --
Net income $ 1.37 $ 0.49 $ --
Diluted earnings per share:
Income before extraordinary item $ 1.35 $ 0.55 $ --
Extraordinary item $ -- $ (0.06) $ --
Net income $ 1.35 $ 0.49 $ --
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
40
PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY (NOTE 1)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
RETAINED
COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL EARNINGS
OWNER'S ------------------------- PAID-IN (ACCUMULATED
EQUITY SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL DEFICIT) TOTAL
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Balance at December 31, 1995 $ 61,359 -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 61,359
Net income 449 -- -- -- -- 449
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Balance at December 31, 1996 61,808 -- -- -- -- 61,808
Net proceeds from the initial public
offering -- 8,050,000 80 143,204 -- 143,284
Capital contribution from PPD (Note 1) (61,808) 8,764,012 88 252,109 (93,066) 97,323
Net income -- -- -- -- 8,313 8,313
Cash dividends paid and declared -- -- -- -- (9,673) (9,673)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Balance at December 31, 1997 -- 16,814,012 168 395,313 (94,426) 301,055
Net proceeds from secondary offering -- 4,348,000 44 85,869 -- 85,913
Net income -- -- -- -- 26,634 26,634
Cash distributions paid and declared -- -- -- -- (30,514) (30,514)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Balance at December 31, 1998 $ -- 21,162,012 $ 212 $ 481,182 $ (98,306) $ 383,088
=========== =========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
41
PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (NOTE 1)
(IN THOUSANDS)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income $ 26,634 $ 8,313 $ 449
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 14,298 8,928 7,693
Amortization of prepaid financing costs 697 453 264
Income from unconsolidated partnerships (737) (409) (109)
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt -- 1,043 --
Minority interests 261 153 44
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash (251) 36 629
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable (1,332) (552) 358
Increase in accrued rent receivable (2,023) (1,625) (1,627)
Increase in deferred lease commissions (1,039) (906) (536)
Increase in prepaid expenses (1,480) (823) (575)
Increase in other assets (609) (1,424) (129)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable 1,124 904 (701)
Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities 3,820 1,151 733
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 39,363 15,242 6,493
--------- --------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisitions of and additions to operating properties (169,140) (157,650) (12,860)
Additions to property under development -- (3,245) (6,634)
Increase (decrease) in construction accounts payable and
accrued expenses 1,656 917 (579)
Contributions to unconsolidated partnerships -- (7,010) (290)
Distributions from unconsolidated partnerships 712 -- --
Increase in other assets -- -- (265)
Acquisitions of and increases in notes receivable (144) (4,651) (608)
Collections of notes receivable 113 5,363 2,434
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities (166,803) (166,276) (18,802)
--------- --------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Line of credit proceeds 177,101 68,500 --
Line of credit payments (101,051) (6,050) --
Notes payable proceeds -- -- 11,666
Notes payable payments (2,479) (123,539) (10,053)
Advances from related party -- 65,210 15,270
Payment of financing costs (601) (216) (1,170)
Acquisition of minority interests (160) (170) --
Contributions from minority interests -- -- 148
Payment of prepayment penalties -- (1,035) --
Refunds from (payments to) loan escrow 43 393 (895)
Issuance of common stock 85,913 143,284 --
Distributions paid (28,567) (3,578) --
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by financing activities 130,199 142,799 14,966
--------- --------- ---------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS 2,759 (8,235) 2,657
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING
OF YEAR -- 8,235 5,578
--------- --------- ---------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR $ 2,759 $ -- $ 8,235
========= ========= =========
(Continued)
F-5
42
PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ----------
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW
INFORMATION:
Cash paid for interest (net of amounts capitalized of
$286, $229 and $412, respectively) $ 17,539 $ 14,206 $ 15,744
Income taxes paid $ 20 $ 19 $ 222
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH
INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Transfer from property under development to
operating properties $ -- $ 5,907 $ 9,327
Transfer from property under development to
prepaid financing costs $ -- $ -- $ 116
Transfer from property under development to
deferred lease commissions $ -- $ 119 $ 197
Transfer of acquisition deposits (included in other assets)
to operating properties $ 1,465 $ -- $ --
Notes payable assumed upon acquisition of operating
properties $ 38,187 $ 37,421 $ --
Wrap-around note receivable and note payable assumed $ -- $ 1,519 $ --
Transfer of notes receivable to operating properties
through foreclosure $ 601 $ 1,283 $ --
Acquisition of minority interest $ 15,722 $ -- $ --
Additions to loan fees and accounts payable $ -- $ -- $ 158
Reclassification of advances from related party to
stockholders' equity $ -- $ 97,323 $ --
Distributions payable $ 8,227 $ 6,095 $ --
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
43
PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996 (TABULAR AMOUNTS ARE IN
THOUSANDS, EXCEPT OPTION AND SHARE DATA)
1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Pan Pacific Realty Corporation was incorporated in the state of Maryland
on April 16, 1997 (inception) and subsequently changed its name to Pan Pacific
Retail Properties, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, the "Company"). The
Company was formed to continue to operate and expand the shopping center
business conducted by Pan Pacific Development (U.S.) Inc. ("PPD"), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Revenue Properties Company Limited ("Revenue
Properties"), and its subsidiaries related to the ownership, leasing and
management of its neighborhood and community shopping centers and a medical
office building ("Pan Pacific Development Properties"). As of December 31, 1998,
the Company owns a portfolio comprised of 54 properties located primarily in the
Western region of the United States. Commencing with its taxable year ended
December 31, 1997, the Company believes it qualifies as a real estate investment
trust ("REIT") under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code.
On August 13, 1997, the Company completed an initial public offering of
8,050,000 shares of common stock at $19.50 per share (including 1,050,000 shares
issued as a result of the full exercise of the over-allotment option by the
underwriters on September 8, 1997) (the "Offering"). The aggregate proceeds to
the Company, net of underwriters' discount, advisory fee and offering costs were
approximately $143,284,000.
The following transactions occurred simultaneously with the completion of
the Offering (collectively, the "Formation Transactions"):
o Certain properties were transferred by PPD entities to the Company
and certain PPD entities were merged with and into the Company.
o PPD advanced cash of $26,486,000 to the Company (the "PPD
Contribution").
o The Company obtained a $150,000,000 unsecured credit facility (the
"Unsecured Credit Facility") which has been and is expected to be
used to finance additional shopping center acquisitions and for
other corporate purposes.
o A portion of the estimated net proceeds of the Offering and the PPD
Contribution were used by the Company to repay indebtedness of the
Company and to pay transaction costs, including fees and expenses
associated with the Unsecured Credit Facility.
The transfer of certain properties and the merger of certain PPD entities
with and into the Company was accounted for as a combination of affiliated
entities under common control in a manner similar to a pooling-of-interests.
Under this method, the assets, liabilities and equity were carried over at their
historical book values and their operations have been recorded on a combined
historical basis. The pooling-of-interests method of accounting also requires
the reporting of results of operations, for the period in which the combination
occurred, as though the entities had been combined as of either the beginning of
the period or inception. Accordingly, the results of operations for the year
ended December 31, 1997 comprise those of the combined entities from August 13,
1997 through December 31, 1997. Prior to the combination, the Company had no
significant operations; therefore, the combined operations for the periods prior
to August 13, 1997 represent primarily the operations of Pan Pacific Development
Properties. All of the accounts of PPD unrelated to these activities have been
excluded from these consolidated financial statements. A deficit of $93,066,000
was accumulated by Pan Pacific Development Properties prior to the Formation
Transactions. The combination did not require any material adjustments to
conform to accounting policies of the separate entities.
F-7
44
PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996 (TABULAR AMOUNTS ARE IN
THOUSANDS, EXCEPT OPTION AND SHARE DATA)
1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION (CONTINUED)
On May 18, 1998, the Company completed a secondary offering of 4,348,000
shares of common stock at $21.125 per share (including 348,000 shares issued as
a result of the partial exercise of the over-allotment option by the
underwriters on June 11, 1998). The aggregate proceeds to the Company, net of
underwriters' discount, advisory fee and offering costs were approximately
$85,913,000.
In September 1998, the Company formed Pan Pacific (Portland), LLC ("PPP
LLC"), with the Company as the sole managing member. In October and November of
1998, PPP LLC acquired a portfolio of six shopping centers located in Oregon. In
exchange for four properties which were contributed to PPP LLC, 832,617 units
were issued to certain non-managing members. A non-managing member can seek
redemption of the units after the first anniversary. The Company, at its option,
may redeem the units by either (i) issuing common stock at the rate of one share
of common stock for each unit, or (ii) paying cash to the non-managing member
based on the average trading price of its common stock. Distributions are made
to the non-managing members at a rate equal to the distribution being paid by
the Company on a share of common stock. Net income or loss is allocated to the
non-managing members in an amount equal to the cumulative distributions earned
by such members. All remaining net income or loss is allocated to the managing
member.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES
(a) PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company
and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (Note 1). All material intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated. At December 31, 1998, the
Company consolidated Chino Town Square, of which the Company's ownership
interest is 93.7%, and PPP LLC, of which the Company's ownership interest is
56.2%. The Company has recorded a minority interest for the portions not owned
by the Company.
(b) CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
For purposes of reporting cash flows, highly liquid investments with an
original maturity of three months or less are considered cash equivalents.
(c) INCOME RECOGNITION
Rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of
the leases, less a general allowance for doubtful accounts relating to accrued
rent receivable for leases which may be terminated before the end of the
contracted term.
(d) CAPITALIZATION OF COSTS
The Company capitalizes certain acquisition related costs to the carrying
costs of the property acquired. These costs are being depreciated over the
estimated useful lives of the properties. The capitalized costs associated with
unsuccessful acquisitions are charged to expense when the acquisition is
abandoned.
F-8
45
PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996 (TABULAR AMOUNTS ARE IN
THOUSANDS, EXCEPT OPTION AND SHARE DATA)
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES (CONTINUED)
(e) DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
Depreciation on buildings and improvements is provided using a forty-year
straight-line basis. Tenant improvements and costs incurred in obtaining leases
are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the lives of the respective
leases.
Prepaid loan fees are amortized over the lives of the loans and the
related amortization expense is included as a component of interest expense.
(f) IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS AND LONG-LIVED ASSETS TO BE DISPOSED OF
The Company reviews long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles
for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to
be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset
to future net cash flows, undiscounted and without interest, expected to be
generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the
impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying
amount of the assets exceed the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed
of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to
sell.
(g) INCOME TAXES
As of April 16, 1997, the Company elected to be taxed as a REIT pursuant
to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. In general, a corporation that
distributes at least 95% of its REIT taxable income to stockholders in any
taxable year and complies with certain other requirements (relating primarily to
the nature of its assets and the sources of its revenue) is not subject to
federal income taxation to the extent of the income which it distributes.
Management believes that the Company has qualified and intends for it to
continue to qualify as a REIT in the future. As discussed more fully in Note 7,
management also does not expect that the Company will pay income taxes on
"built-in gains" on certain of its assets. Based on these considerations,
management does not believe that the Company will be liable for income taxes at
the federal level or in most of the states in which it operates in future years.
Where required, deferred income taxes are accounted for using the asset
and liability method. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized
for temporary differences between the financial reporting bases of assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases and for operating loss and tax credit
carryforwards based on enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when such
amounts are realized or settled. However, deferred tax assets are recognized
only to the extent that it is more likely than not that they will be realized
based on consideration of available evidence, including tax planning strategies
and other factors.
(h) CREDIT RISK
The Company predominantly operates in one industry segment, real estate
ownership, management and development. No single tenant accounts for 10% or more
of rental revenue. Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company
to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of temporary cash
investments and receivables. The Company places its temporary cash investments
with financial institutions which the Company believes are of high credit
quality. Concentration of credit risk with respect to receivables is limited due
to the large number of tenants comprising the Company's customer base, and their
dispersion across many geographical areas. At December 31, 1998 and 1997, the
Company had no significant concentration of credit risk.
F-9
46
PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996 (TABULAR AMOUNTS ARE IN
THOUSANDS, EXCEPT OPTION AND SHARE DATA)
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES (CONTINUED)
(i) NET INCOME PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share ("EPS") is computed by dividing earnings
available to common stockholders during the period by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted EPS is computed
by dividing the amount of earnings for the period available to common
stockholders during the period by the weighted average number of shares that
would have been outstanding assuming the issuance of common shares for all
dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the reporting period, net of
shares assumed to be repurchased using the treasury stock method.
The following is a reconciliation of the denominator for the basic EPS
computation to the denominator of the diluted EPS computation (all net income is
available to common stockholders for the period presented):
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1998 1997
---------- ----------
Weighted average shares used for the
basic EPS computation (deemed
outstanding the entire year in 1997) 19,507,141 16,814,012
Incremental shares from the assumed
exercise of dilutive stock options
and units 155,481 52,161
---------- ----------
Weighted average shares used for the
diluted EPS computation 19,662,622 16,866,173
========== ==========
At December 31, 1998, there were 328,500 anti-dilutive options
outstanding. There were no anti-dilutive options outstanding at December 31,
1997. An earnings per share calculation for 1996 is not applicable as there were
no shares outstanding during this year.
(j) STOCK OPTION PLAN
The Company accounts for its stock option plan in accordance with the
provisions of Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25, "Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees", and related interpretations. As such,
compensation expense is recorded on the date of grant only if the current market
price of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price. Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123 ("SFAS No. 123"), "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation", permits entities to recognize as expense over the vesting period
the fair value of all stock-based awards on the date of grant. Alternatively,
SFAS No. 123 allows entities to continue to apply the provisions of APB Opinion
No. 25 and provide pro forma net income and pro forma earnings per share
disclosures for employee stock option grants made as if the fair-value-based
method defined in SFAS No. 123 had been applied. The Company has elected to
continue to apply the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25 and provide the annual
pro forma disclosures required by SFAS No. 123.
F-10
47
PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996 (TABULAR AMOUNTS ARE IN
THOUSANDS, EXCEPT OPTION AND SHARE DATA)
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES (CONTINUED)
(k) SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information" ("SFAS No. 131"). SFAS No. 131 establishes standards for the way
public business enterprises report information about operating segments in
annual financial statements and requires that those enterprises report selected
information about operating segments in interim financial reports issued to
stockholders. It also establishes standards for related disclosures about
products and services, geographic areas, and major customers.
(l) USE OF ESTIMATES
Management of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions
relating to the reporting of assets, liabilities and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reporting of revenue and expenses during the reporting period to prepare
these financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(m) RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain reclassifications of 1996 and 1997 amounts have been made in order
to conform to 1998 presentation.
3. INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include investments in
two partnerships in which the Company does not own a controlling interest. At
December 31, 1998 and 1997, the Company owned 50% general partner interests in
Melrose Village Plaza and North Coast Health Center. These investments are
reported using the equity method. On January 5, 1999, the Company acquired the
remaining interest in Melrose Village Plaza from the limited partner (see Note
15).
Summarized combined financial information for the partnerships is
presented below:
AS OF DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------
1998 1997
---------- ----------
Properties $ 19,182 $ 19,364
Other assets 894 550
---------- ----------
Total assets $ 20,076 $ 19,914
========== ==========
Liabilities $ 184 $ 72
Equity 19,892 19,842
---------- ----------
Total liabilities and equity $ 20,076 $ 19,914
========== ==========
FOR THE YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- ---------
Revenue $ 4,186 $ 4,046 $ 4,064
Expenses 2,712 3,228 3,846
--------- --------- ---------
Net income $ 1,474 $ 818 $ 218
========= ========= =========
F-11
48
PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996
(TABULAR AMOUNTS ARE IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT OPTION AND SHARE DATA)
4. NOTES PAYABLE AND LINE OF CREDIT
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------
1998 1997
---------- ----------
Notes payable consist of the following:
Bank notes payable, secured by a mortgage and deeds of trust, bearing
interest at 8.17% with monthly principal and interest payments of $404,
due in January 2007 $ 53,429 $ 53,836
Bank note payable, secured by a deed of trust, bearing interest at 8.00% with
monthly principal and interest payments of $230, due in March 2000 27,160 27,726
Bank note payable, secured by a deed of trust, bearing interest at 7.75% with
monthly principal and interest payments of $37, due in March 2004 4,561 4,652
Bank note payable, secured by a deed of trust, bearing interest at 8.52% with
monthly principal and interest payments of $35, due in January 2007 4,441 4,472
Bank notes payable, secured by deeds of trust, bearing interest at 7.80% with
monthly principal and interest payments of $107, due in December 2005 11,172 11,569
Bank notes payable, secured by deeds of trust, bearing interest at 7.88% with
monthly principal and interest payments of $56, due in November 2010 5,161 6,061
Bank note payable, secured by deeds of trust, bearing interest at 8.73% with
monthly principal and interest payments of $144, due in February 2007 (a) 17,148 --
Bank note payable, secured by a deed of trust, bearing interest at 7.65% with
monthly principal and interest payments of $54, due in October 2012 (b) 7,569 --
Bank note payable, secured by a deed of trust, bearing interest at 8.50% with
monthly principal and interest payments of $34, due in March 2000 3,725 --
Promissory note payable, secured by a deed of trust, bearing interest at 8%,
due and repaid in January 1999 7,700 --
---------- ----------
142,066 108,316
Unamortized note payable premiums 1,958 --
---------- ----------
$ 144,024 $ 108,316
========== ==========
F-12
49
PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996
(TABULAR AMOUNTS ARE IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT OPTION AND SHARE DATA)
4. NOTES PAYABLE AND LINE OF CREDIT (CONTINUED)
Principal payments under these notes payable are due as follows:
1999 $ 9,952
2000 31,836
2001 1,812
2002 1,965
2003 2,136
2004 and subsequent 94,365
---------
$142,066
=========
(a) Excludes unamortized note payable premium of $1,620.
(b) Excludes unamortized note payable premium of $338.
As part of the Formation Transactions, $134,217,000 of notes payable were
repaid. In connection with the early payoff of these notes, an extraordinary
loss of $1,043,000 was recorded which includes prepayment penalties, unamortized
financing costs and loan premium.
The Company also has a $200,000,000 Unsecured Credit Facility which bears
interest, at the Company's option, at either LIBOR plus 1.375% or a reference
rate and expires in August 2000. At December 31, 1998, the amount drawn on this
line of credit was $138,500,000 and the interest rate was 6.58%. The credit
facility requires a quarterly fee of .25% per annum on the unused amount of the
available commitment if less than half of the commitment has been used. The
quarterly unused fee decreases to .125% per annum once more than half of the
commitment has been drawn.
5. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate fair value of
each class of financial instruments:
i) Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, certain
notes receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other
liabilities
The carrying amounts approximate fair values because of the short maturity
of these instruments.
ii) A note receivable and advances from related party
It was not practicable to estimate the fair value of these instruments due
to the uncertainty of the timing of repayment.
iii) Notes receivable
The fair value of the notes receivable approximates the carrying amount
based on market rates for the same or other instruments with similar risk,
security and remaining maturities.
F-13
50
PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996
(TABULAR AMOUNTS ARE IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT OPTION AND SHARE DATA)
5. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (CONTINUED)
iv) Notes and line of credit payable
The fair value of notes payable and the line of credit payable
approximates the carrying amount based on the current rates offered for
notes and lines of credit payable with similar risks and maturities.
6. STOCK OPTION PLAN
In August 1997, the Company established the 1997 Stock Option and
Incentive Plan (the "Plan") pursuant to which the Company's Board of Directors
may grant stock options to officers and key employees. The Plan authorizes
grants of options to purchase up to 1,620,000 shares of authorized but unissued
common stock. Stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the
stock's fair value at the date of grant. At the time of the Offering, the
Company issued to certain officers, directors and key employees, 900,000 common
stock options pursuant to the Plan. The stock options were granted with an
exercise price of $19.50, equal to the stock's fair value at the date of grant.
On March 17, 1998, the Company issued an additional 337,500 common stock options
pursuant to the Plan. The stock options were granted with an exercise price of
$22.1875, equal to the stock's fair value at the date of grant. The stock
options have seven-year terms and vest 33 1/3% per year over three years from
the date of grant, except for the options granted to the independent directors
which vest 33 1/3% immediately, with the remainder vesting ratably over two
years.
At December 31, 1998, there were 404,833 additional shares available for
grant under the Plan. The per share weighted-average fair value of stock options
granted during 1998 and 1997 were $2.48 and $2.64, respectively, on the dates of
grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the following
weighted-average assumptions:
1998 1997
----- -----
Expected distribution yield 7.50% 6.75%
Risk-free interest rate 5.00% 6.50%
Expected volatility 23.72% 22.05%
Expected life (years) 5 5
The Company applies APB Opinion No. 25 in accounting for its Plan and,
accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for its stock options in
the financial statements. Had the Company determined compensation cost based on
the fair value at the grant date for its stock options under SFAS No. 123, the
Company's net income would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated
below:
1998 1997
------------------------------ -----------------------------
AS REPORTED PRO FORMA AS REPORTED PRO FORMA
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Net income $ 26,634 $ 25,676 $ 8,313 $ 8,012
Diluted earnings per share $ 1.35 $ 1.31 $ 0.49 $ 0.48
Pro forma net income reflects options granted since adoption of the Plan.
F-14
51
PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996
(TABULAR AMOUNTS ARE IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT OPTION AND SHARE DATA)
6. STOCK OPTION PLAN (CONTINUED)
Stock option activity during the periods presented is as follows:
NUMBER OF WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
OPTIONS EXERCISE PRICE
------------ ----------------
Balance at December 31, 1996 -- --
Granted 900,000 $ 19.5000
Exercised -- --
Forfeited -- --
Expired -- --
------------
Balance at December 31, 1997 900,000 19.5000
Granted 337,500 22.1875
Exercised -- --
Forfeited (20,666) 20.6700
Expired (1,667) 19.5000
------------
Balance at December 31, 1998 1,215,167 20.2265
============
At December 31, 1998, the weighted-average exercise price and
weighted-average remaining contractual life of outstanding options were $20.2265
and 5.7 years, respectively. At December 31, 1998, 310,007 of the options were
exercisable.
7. INCOME TAXES
The Company's income tax expense is included in other expenses and
consists of the following:
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
-------- -------- --------
Current income taxes:
Federal $ -- $ -- $ 49
State 20 19 73
-------- -------- --------
$ 20 $ 19 $ 122
======== ======== ========
The differences between income tax expense computed using statutory income
tax rates and the Company's effective income tax rate are as follows:
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
------------ ------------ ------------
Federal income taxes $ 9,062 $ 3,188 $ 194
State income taxes, net
of federal benefit 1,554 572 34
Decrease in valuation allowance -- (2,519) (228)
Distributions paid deduction (10,616) (1,222) --
Other 20 -- 122
------------ ------------ ------------
$ 20 $ 19 $ 122
============ ============ ============
F-15
52
PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996
(TABULAR AMOUNTS ARE IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT OPTION AND SHARE DATA)
7. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
At December 31, 1998, the Company had unused net operating losses carried
forward for federal income tax purposes of approximately $12,000,000. The
Company went through a change in control for tax purposes during 1997 which
significantly restricts the use of the Company's net operating losses carried
forward in future years. The net operating losses carried forward expire at
various times through 2010.
As discussed in Note 2(g), the Company elected to be taxed as a REIT,
effective April 16, 1997. Management believes that the Company qualified and
management's intent is to continue to qualify as a REIT and therefore does not
expect the Company will be liable for income taxes on "built-in gains" on its
assets at the federal level or in most states in future years. Accordingly, for
the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997, no provision was recorded for
federal or substantially all state income taxes.
In connection with the Company's incorporation and the Offering in 1997,
certain nontaxable mergers were consummated with PPD whereby several
wholly-owned subsidiaries of PPD merged with and into the Company. To the extent
the excess fair value of the assets at the date of merger exceeded the aggregate
adjusted tax bases of those assets, a net unrecognized built-in gain was created
for income tax purposes.
In connection with its election to be taxed as a REIT, the Company will
also elect to be subject to the "built-in gain" rules. Under these rules, taxes
may be payable at the time and to the extent that the net unrealized gains on
the Company's assets at the date of conversion to REIT status are recognized in
taxable dispositions of such assets in the ten-year period following conversion.
Such net unrealized gains were approximately $50,000,000 at December 31, 1998
and 1997. Management believes that the Company will not be required to make
payments of income taxes on built-in gains during the ten-year period ending
December 31, 2007 due to the availability of its net operating loss carryforward
to offset built-in gains which might be recognized, the potential for the
Company to make nontaxable dispositions, if necessary (e.g., like-kind exchanges
of properties) and the intent and ability of the Company to defer asset
dispositions to periods when related gains will not be subject to the built-in
gains income taxes. However, it may be necessary to recognize a liability for
such income taxes in the future if management's plans and intentions with
respect to asset dispositions, or the related tax laws, change.
8. FUTURE LEASE REVENUE
Total future minimum lease receipts under noncancellable operating tenant
leases in effect at December 31, 1998 are as follows:
1999 $ 70,804
2000 66,240
2001 59,116
2002 52,513
2003 44,572
2004 and subsequent 255,178
--------
$548,423
========
F-16
53
PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996
(TABULAR AMOUNTS ARE IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT OPTION AND SHARE DATA)
9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
(a) Included in general and administrative expenses are management fees
totaling $481,000 and $780,000 for the years ended December 31, 1997 and
1996, respectively, which are a reimbursement of costs incurred by Revenue
Properties for managing the development of the properties, directing
corporate strategy, and consulting on operations. Effective August 13,
1997, at the closing of the Offering, these fees are no longer being
incurred by the Company.
(b) The Company paid a consulting fee of $259,000 and $420,000 for the years
ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively, to a sole proprietorship
owned by a director of Revenue Properties. Effective August 13, 1997, at
the closing of the Offering, these fees are no longer being incurred by
the Company.
(c) The Company incurred $529,000 and $1,878,000 for the years ended December
31, 1997 and 1996, respectively, for loan guaranty fees charged by Revenue
Properties. These fees are recorded as a component of other expenses.
Effective August 13, 1997, at the closing of the Offering, these fees are
no longer being incurred by the Company.
(d) Pursuant to the Offering, the Company issued shares of common stock in
lieu of repayment of net advances from Revenue Properties of $97,323,000
at August 13, 1997. Subsequent to this date, no advances have been
received from Revenue Properties.
(e) Distributions paid to PPD during 1998 and 1997 were $14,625,000 and
$1,837,000, respectively. At December 31, 1998 and 1997, $4,107,000 and
$3,130,000, respectively, were payable as distributions to PPD.
(f) The Company has a note receivable at December 31, 1998 of $144,000 due
from an executive officer. The note bears interest at 7.00% and matures in
December 1999. On January 21, 1999, principal of $20,000 was repaid. On
March 24, 1999, the remaining principal and accrued interest outstanding
of approximately $125,000 was repaid.
10. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN
The Company implemented an employee benefit plan in March 1997. All employees of
the Company who meet certain minimum age and period of service requirements are
eligible to participate in a Section 401(k) plan as defined by the Internal
Revenue Code. The employee benefit plan allows eligible employees to defer up to
15 percent of their annual compensation. The amounts contributed by employees
are immediately vested and non-forfeitable. The Company, at management's
discretion, may match employee contributions. This cost is accrued as incurred.
The Company's cost for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997 was
approximately $17,000 and $63,000, respectively.
F-17
54
PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996
(TABULAR AMOUNTS ARE IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT OPTION AND SHARE DATA)
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
(a) The Company leases certain real estate and office equipment under
operating leases expiring at various dates through 2021. Rental expense
was $809,695, $636,958 and $618,018 for the years ended December 31, 1998,
1997 and 1996, respectively. Minimum rentals under noncancellable leases
in effect at December 31, 1998 were as follows:
1999 $ 778
2000 776
2001 776
2002 445
2003 209
2004 and subsequent 3,296
-------
$ 6,280
=======
(b) Various claims and legal proceedings arise in the ordinary course of
business. The ultimate amount of liability from all claims and actions
cannot be determined with certainty, but in the opinion of management, the
ultimate liability from all pending and threatened legal claims will not
materially affect the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.
12. UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The accompanying unaudited pro forma information for the years ended
December 31, 1997 and 1996 is presented as if the Formation Transactions
(including the acquisition of Chico Crossroads, Monterey Plaza, Fairmont
Shopping Center, Lakewood Shopping Center, Green Valley Town & Country and
secured notes receivable), the Offering described in Note 1 to the financial
statements and the repayment of notes payable pursuant to the Offering had all
occurred on January 1, 1996. Such pro forma information is based upon the
historical financial statements of the Company and should be read in connection
with the financial statements and the notes thereto.
This unaudited pro forma condensed information does not purport to
represent what the actual results of operations of the Company would have been
assuming such transactions had been completed as set forth above, nor does it
purport to predict the results of operations for future periods.
Pro Forma Condensed Income Statements
(in thousands, except share data)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1997 1996
---------- ----------
(unaudited) (unaudited)
Total revenue $ 50,358 $ 45,559
Net income $ 17,537 $ 16,361
Basic and diluted earnings per share $ 1.04 $ 0.97(a)
(a) assuming 16,814,012 shares outstanding
F-18
55
PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996
(TABULAR AMOUNTS ARE IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT OPTION AND SHARE DATA)
13. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
The following summarizes the condensed quarterly financial information for
the Company:
QUARTERS ENDED 1998
---------------------------------------------------------------
DECEMBER 31 SEPTEMBER 30 JUNE 30 MARCH 31
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Revenue $ 22,323 $ 20,242 $ 19,248 $ 17,440
Expenses and minority interests 14,612 12,793 13,146 12,068
============ ============ ============ ============
Net income $ 7,711 $ 7,449 $ 6,102 $ 5,372
============ ============ ============ ============
Basic and diluted earnings per share $ 0.36 $ 0.35 $ 0.32 $ 0.32
QUARTERS ENDED 1997
---------------------------------------------------------------
DECEMBER 31 SEPTEMBER 30 JUNE 30 MARCH 31
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Revenue $ 14,571 $ 12,154 $ 10,667 $ 9,318
Expenses and minority interests 9,421 8,925 9,873 9,135
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Income before extraordinary item 5,150 3,229 794 183
Extraordinary loss on early
extinguishment of debt -- 1,043 -- --
============ ============ ============ ============
Net income $ 5,150 $ 2,186 $ 794 $ 183
============ ============ ============ ============
Basic earnings per share:
Income before extraordinary item $ 0.31 $ 0.19 $ 0.05 $ 0.01
Net income $ 0.31 $ 0.13 $ 0.05 $ 0.01
14. SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company predominantly operates in one industry segment, real estate
ownership, management and development. As of December 31, 1998, the Company
owned 54 community shopping centers primarily located in the Western United
States (see Note 1). Management reviews operating and financial data for each
property separately and independently from all other properties when making
resource allocation decisions and measuring performance. Therefore, the Company
has 54 operating segments, with no segment representing more than 10% of the
total for the Company. No single tenant accounts for 10% or more of rental
revenue and none of the shopping centers are located in a foreign country.
15. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On January 5, 1999, the Company purchased the remaining 50% partnership
interest in Melrose Village Plaza. The purchase price was $7,150,000 and was
financed primarily by a draw under the Company's line of credit.
F-19
56
PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
SCHEDULE III
PROPERTIES AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 1998
(IN THOUSANDS)
COSTS CAPITALIZED
SUBSEQUENT TO
INITIAL COSTS ACQUISITION
--------------------------- -----------------------------
BUILDINGS
AND CARRYING
DESCRIPTION ENCUMBRANCES LAND IMPROVEMENTS(2) IMPROVEMENTS(2) COSTS
- ----------- ------------ ---- --------------- --------------- --------
PROPERTIES:
24 Hour Fitness
Hillsboro, OR $ -- $ 569 $ 1,706 $ 188 $ --
Arlington Courtyard
Riverside, CA -- 401 753 73 --
Bear Creek Plaza
Medford, OR -- 3,275 9,825 609 --
Brookvale Center
Fremont, CA -- 3,164 9,492 426 --
Canyon Ridge Plaza
Kent, WA -- 2,457 -- 7,641 1,275
Cheyenne Commons
Las Vegas, NV -- 8,540 26,810 1,262 --
Chico Crossroads
Chico, CA -- 3,600 17,063 16 --
Chino Town Square
Chino, CA 27,160 8,801 10,297 25,465 --
Claremont Village
Everett, WA -- 2,320 6,987 129 --
Country Club Center
Rio Rancho, NM 3,253 566 2,514 777 --
Creekside Center
Hayward, CA -- 1,500 4,500 51 --
Fairmont Shopping Center
Fairmont, CA -- 3,420 8,003 127 --
Fashion Faire
San Leandro, CA -- 2,863 8,588 121 --
Foothill Center
Rialto, CA -- 314 1,078 20 --
Glen Cove Center
Vallejo, CA 3,850 1,925 5,775 10 --
Green Valley Town & Country
Henderson, NV -- 4,096 12,333 54 --
Hermiston Plaza
Hermiston, OR -- 1,931 5,791 758 --
Hood River Center
Hood River, OR -- 1,169 3,507 172 --
Jumbo Sports
Memphis, TN -- 1,204 3,780 186 --
Laguna Village
Sacramento, CA -- 3,226 -- 14,793 1,644
Lakewood Shopping Center
Lakewood, CA -- 2,363 7,125 43 --
Laurentian Center
Ontario, CA 4,561 2,767 6,445 689 --
Manteca Marketplace
Manteca, CA -- 3,904 11,713 353 --
Maysville Marketsquare
Maysville, KY 5,323 3,454 2,001 3,693 79
Milwaukie Marketplace
Milwaukie, OR -- 3,181 9,554 177 --
Mira Loma Shopping Center
Reno, NV 3,850 1,925 5,775 11 --
TOTAL COSTS
--------------------------------------
BUILDINGS DATE OF
AND TOTAL ACCUMULATED ACQUIS.(A)
DESCRIPTION E LAND IMPROVEMENTS (1)(2)(3) DEPRECIATION(2)(3) CONSTR.(C)
- ----------- - ---- ------------ --------- ------------------- -----------
PROPERTIES:
24 Hour Fitness
Hillsboro, OR $ 569 $ 1,894 $ 2,463 $ 44 1998(A)
Arlington Courtyard
Riverside, CA 401 826 1,227 175 1994(A)
Bear Creek Plaza
Medford, OR 3,275 10,434 13,709 257 1998(A)
Brookvale Center
Fremont, CA 3,164 9,918 13,082 261 1997(A)
Canyon Ridge Plaza
Kent, WA 2,641 8,732 11,373 833 1992(A)
1995(C)
Cheyenne Commons
Las Vegas, NV 8,540 28,072 36,612 2,757 1995(A)
Chico Crossroads
Chico, CA 3,600 17,079 20,679 790 1997(A)
Chino Town Square
Chino, CA 21,249 23,314 44,563 2,061 1992(A)
Claremont Village
Everett, WA 2,320 7,116 9,436 212 1997(A)
Country Club Center
Rio Rancho, NM 566 3,291 3,857 819 1992(A)
Creekside Center
Hayward, CA 1,500 4,551 6,051 86 1998(A)
Fairmont Shopping Center
Fairmont, CA 3,420 8,130 11,550 348 1997(A)
Fashion Faire
San Leondro, CA 2,863 8,709 11,572 128 1998(A)
Foothill Center
Rialto, CA 314 1,098 1,412 50 1997(A)
Glen Cove Center
Vallejo, CA 1,925 5,785 7,710 24 1998(A)
Green Valley Town & Country
Henderson, NV 4,096 12,387 16,483 425 1997(A)
Hermiston Plaza
Hermiston, OR 1,931 6,549 8,480 39 1998(A)
Hood River Center
Hood River, OR 1,169 3,679 4,848 23 1998(A)
Jumbo Sports
Memphis, TN 1,204 3,966 5,170 879 1992(A)
Laguna Village
Sacramento, CA 3,448 16,215 19,663 1,238 1992(A)
1996/97(C)
Lakewood Shopping Center
Lakewood, CA 2,363 7,168 9,531 291 1997(A)
Lanrentian Center
Ontario, CA 2,767 7,134 9,901 1,179 1994/96(A)
Manteca Marketplace
Manteca, CA 3,904 12,066 15,970 262 1998(A)
Maysville Marketsquare
Maysville, KY 3,299 5,928 9,227 1,005 1992(A)
1993(C)
Milwaukie Marketplace
Milwaukie, OR 3,181 9,731 12,912 205 1998(A)
Mira Loma Shopping Center
Reno, NV 1,925 5,786 7,711 18 1998(A)
F-20
57
PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
SCHEDULE III
PROPERTIES AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1998
(IN THOUSANDS)
COSTS CAPITALIZED
SUBSEQUENT TO
INITIAL COSTS ACQUISITION
--------------------------- -----------------------------
BUILDINGS
AND CARRYING
DESCRIPTION ENCUMBRANCES LAND IMPROVEMENTS(2) IMPROVEMENTS(2) COSTS
- ----------- ------------ ---- --------------- --------------- --------
PROPERTIES:
Monterey Plaza
San Jose, CA -- 7,688 18,761 136 --
Ocoee Plaza
Ocoee, FL -- 651 2,911 314 --
Olympia Square
Olympia, WA 13,998 3,737 11,580 1,341 --
Olympia West Center
Olympia, WA 5,161 2,735 8,295 141 --
Oregon City Shopping Center
Oregon City, OR 10,510 4,426 13,272 120 --
Oregon Trail
Gresham, OR -- 3,593 10,779 1,217 --
Pacific Commons Shopping
Center
Spanaway, WA -- 3,419 10,256 58 --
Palmdale Center
Palmdale, CA -- 1,150 3,454 56 --
Panther Lake Shopping Center
Kent, WA -- 1,950 5,850 61 --
Pioneer Plaza
Springfield, OR -- 1,864 5,591 130 --
Powell Valley Junction
Gresham, OR -- 1,546 4,639 162 --
Rainbow Promenade
Las Vegas, NV -- 9,390 21,774 262 --
Rosewood Village
Santa Rosa, CA 4,441 2,180 4,958 172 --
Sahara Pavilion North
Las Vegas, NV 30,855 11,920 28,554 471 --
Sahara Pavilion South
Las Vegas, NV -- 4,833 12,988 1,101 --
San Dimas Market Place
San Dimas, CA -- 5,700 17,100 218 --
Sandy Marketplace
Sandy, OR 4,880 2,046 6,064 101 --
Shute Park Plaza
Hillsboro, OR -- 994 2,981 101 --
Southgate Center
Milwaukie, OR 3,378 1,424 4,268 34 --
Sunset Mall
Portland, OR 7,907 2,996 8,989 79 --
Sunset Square
Bellingham, WA -- 6,100 18,647 1,676 --
Tacoma Central
Tacoma, WA 11,172 5,314 16,288 41 --
Tanasbourne Village
Hillsboro, OR -- 5,573 13,861 1,433 --
Tustin Heights
Tustin, CA -- 3,675 10,776 412 --
Vineyard Village East
Ontario, CA -- 649 2,716 137 --
Westwood Village Shopping
Center
Redding, CA 3,725 1,131 3,393 261 --
Winterwood Pavilion
Las Vegas, NV -- 4,573 13,015 1,078 --
-------- -------- -------- ------- ------
$144,024 $174,192 $463,175 $69,157 $2,998
======== ======== ======== ======= ======
TOTAL COSTS
--------------------------------------
BUILDINGS DATE OF
AND TOTAL ACCUMULATED ACQUIS.(A)
DESCRIPTION LAND IMPROVEMENTS (1)(2)(3) DEPRECIATION(2)(3) CONSTR.(C)
- ----------- ---- ------------ --------- ------------------- -----------
PROPERTIES:
Monterey Plaza
San Jose, CA 7,688 18,897 26,585 820 1997(A)
Ocoee Plaza
Ocoee, FL 651 3,225 3,876 522 1992(A)
Olympia Square
Olympia, WA 3,737 12,921 16,658 3,144 1992(A)
Olympia West Center
Olympia, WA 2,735 8,436 11,171 253 1997(A)
Oregon City Shopping Center
Oregon City, OR 4,426 13,392 17,818 59 1998(A)
Oregon Trail
Gresham, OR 3,593 11,996 15,589 75 1998(A)
Pacific Commons Shopping
Center
Spanaway, WA 3,419 10,314 13,733 130 1998(A)
Palmdale Center
Palmdale, CA 1,150 3,510 4,660 87 1997(A)
Panther Lake Shopping Center
Kent, WA 1,950 5,911 7,861 112 1998(A)
Pioneer Plaza
Springfield, OR 1,864 5,721 7,585 134 1998(A)
Powell Valley Junction
Gresham, OR 1,546 4,801 6,347 110 1998(A)
Rainbow Promenade
Las Vegas, NV 9,390 22,036 31,426 714 1997(A)
Rosewood Village
Santa Rosa, CA 2,180 5,130 7,310 1,215 1992(A)
Sahara Pavilion North
Las Vegas, NV 11,920 29,025 40,945 5,141 1992(A)
Sahara Pavilion South
Las Vegas, NV 4,833 14,089 18,922 2,812 1992(A)
San Dimas Market Place
San Dimas, CA 5,700 17,318 23,018 432 1998(A)
Sandy Marketplace
Sandy, OR 2,046 6,165 8,211 27 1998(A)
Shute Park Plaza
Hillsboro, OR 994 3,082 4,076 72 1998(A)
Southgate Center
Milwaukie, OR 1,424 4,302 5,726 19 1998(A)
Sunset Mall
Portland, OR 2,996 9,068 12,064 37 1998(A)
Sunset Square
Bellingham, WA 6,100 20,323 26,423 4,436 1992(A)
Tacoma Central
Tacoma, WA 5,314 16,329 21,643 477 1997(A)
Tanasbourne Village
Hillsboro, OR 5,573 15,294 20,867 2,998 1992(A)
Tustin Heights
Tustin, CA 3,675 11,188 14,863 278 1997(A)
Vineyard Village East
Ontario, CA 649 2,853 3,502 384 1994(A)
Westwood Village Shopping
Center
Redding, CA 1,131 3,654 4,785 51 1998(A)
Winterwood Pavilion
Las Vegas, NV 4,573 14,093 18,666 3,096 1992(A)
-------- -------- -------- -------
$186,891 $522,631 $709,522 $42,044
======== ======== ======== =======
F-21
58
PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
SCHEDULE III
PROPERTIES AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1998
(IN THOUSANDS)
NOTES:
(1) The aggregate gross cost of the properties owned by Pan Pacific Retail
Properties, Inc. for federal income tax purposes, approximated $721,166 as
of December 31, 1998.
(2) Net of write-offs of fully depreciated assets.
(3) The following table reconciles the historical cost and related accumulated
depreciation and amortization of Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc. from
January 1, 1996 through December 31, 1998:
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
COST OF PROPERTIES 1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- ---------
Balance, beginning of period $ 485,590 $ 290,874 $ 273,677
Additions during period (acquisition, improvements, etc.) 224,989 199,251 18,682
Interest capitalized 286 229 412
Deductions during period (write-off of tenant
improvements) (1,343) (4,764) (1,897)
--------- --------- ---------
Balance, close of period $ 709,522 $ 485,590 $ 290,874
========= ========= =========
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION 1998 1997 1996
-------- -------- --------
Balance, beginning of period $ 30,076 $ 26,857 $ 22,254
Additions during period (depreciation and amortization
expense) 13,311 7,983 6,500
Deductions during period (write-off of accumulated
depreciation of tenant improvements) (1,343) (4,764) (1,897)
-------- -------- --------
Balance, close of period $ 42,044 $ 30,076 $ 26,857
======== ======== ========
See accompanying independent auditors' report.
F-22
59
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. Description
----------- --------------------------------------------------------
3.1 Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Company
(previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Registration No.
333-28715) and incorporated herein by reference)
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (previously
filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-11 (Registration No. 333-28715) and
incorporated herein by reference)
4.1 Form of Certificate of Common Stock (previously filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form S-11 (Registration No. 333-28715) and incorporated
herein by reference)
10.1 The 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of Pan Pacific
Retail Properties, Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit
10.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
S-11 (Registration No. 333-28715) and incorporated
herein by reference)
10.2 Form of Officers and Directors Indemnification Agreement
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Registration No.
333-28715) and incorporated herein by reference)
10.3 Form of Employment Agreement between the Company and Mr.
Stuart A. Tanz (previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11
(Registration No. 333-28715) and incorporated herein by
reference)
10.4 Form of Employment Agreement between the Company and Mr.
David L. Adlard (previously filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11
(Registration No. 333-28715) and incorporated herein by
reference)
10.5 Form of Employment Agreement between the Company and Mr.
Jeffrey S. Stauffer (previously filed as Exhibit 10.5 to
the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11
(Registration No. 333-28715) and incorporated herein by
reference)
10.6 Form of Miscellaneous Rights Agreement (previously filed
as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Registration Statement
on Form S-11 (Registration No. 333-28715) and
incorporated herein by reference)
10.7 Form of Non-Competition Agreement (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form S-11 (Registration No. 333-28715) and incorporated
herein by reference)
10.8 Purchase and Sale Agreement for Green Valley Town &
Country Shopping Center (previously filed as Exhibit
10.11 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
S-11 (Registration No. 333-28715) and incorporated
herein by reference)
10.9 Credit Agreement with Bank of America NT&SA (previously
filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's filing of Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 and
incorporated herein by reference)
60
Exhibit No. Description
----------- --------------------------------------------------------
10.10 Purchase and Sale Agreement for Rainbow Promenade
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's
filing of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997
and incorporated herein by reference)
10.11 Purchase and Sale Agreement for Claremont Village
Shopping Center (previously filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the
Company's filing of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.12 Purchase and Sale Agreement for Olympia West Plaza
Shopping Center (previously filed as Exhibit 10.10 to
the Company's filing of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.13 Purchase and Sale Agreement for Tacoma Central Shopping
Center (previously filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the
Company's filing of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.14 Modification Agreement to the Credit Agreement with Bank
of America NT & SA (previously filed as exhibit 10.3 to
the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11
(Registration No. 333-50125) and incorporated herein by
reference)
10.15 Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement
of Pan Pacific (Portland), LLC (previously filed as
Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed October 23,
1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.16 Purchase and Sale and Ground Lease Assignment and
Assumption Agreement and Escrow Instructions (previously
filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on
October 23, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.17 First Amendment To Purchase and Sale Ground Lease
Assignment and Assumption Agreement and Escrow
Instructions (previously filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the
Company's Form 8-K Filed October 23, 1998 and
incorporated herein by reference)
10.18 Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions
(previously filed as Exhibit 99.4 to the Company's Form
8-K filed October 23, 1998 and incorporated herein by
reference)
10.19 Contribution Agreement and Escrow Instructions by and
between Portland Fixture Limited Partnership PFMGP,
Inc., and Pan Pacific (Portland), LLC dated September
23, 1998, and related amendments (previously filed as
Exhibit 99.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed November
12, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.20 Contribution Agreement and Escrow Instructions by and
between Portland Fixture Limited Partnership,
Independent Member Corp., Byron P. Henry, Steven J.
Oliva and Pan Pacific (Portland), LLC dated September
23, 1998, and related amendments (previously filed as
Exhibit 99.3 to the Company's Form 8-K filed November
12, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.21 Form of First Amendment to Employment Agreement between
the Company and Mr. Stuart A. Tanz
10.22 Form of First Amendment to Non-Qualified Stock Option
Agreement between the Company and Mr. Stuart A. Tanz
61
Exhibit No. Description
----------- --------------------------------------------------------
10.23 Form of First Amendment to Incentive Stock Option
Agreement between the Company and Mr. Stuart A. Tanz
10.24 Restricted Stock Agreement between the Company and Mr.
Stuart A. Tanz
10.25 Form of First Amendment to Restricted Stock Agreement
between the Company and Mr. Stuart A. Tanz
10.26 Form of First Amendment to Employment Agreement between
the Company and Mr. Jeffrey S. Stauffer
10.27 Restricted Stock Agreement between the Company and Mr.
Jeffrey S. Stauffer
10.28 Form of First Amendment to Restricted Stock Agreement
between the Company and Mr. Jeffrey S. Stauffer
10.29 Form of First Amendment to Employment Agreement between
the Company and Mr. David L. Adlard
10.30 Restricted Stock Agreement between the Company and Mr.
David L. Adlard
10.31 Form of First Amendment to Restricted Stock Agreement
between the Company and Mr. David L. Adlard
10.32 Form of First Amendment to Non-Qualified Stock Option
Agreement for Independent Directors
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1 Consent of KPMG LLP
27.1 Financial Data Schedule (electronically filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission only)