Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Form 10-K

Commission file number: 28050

Onyx Acceptance Corporation

Onyx Acceptance Corporation

(949) 465-3900

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes þ          No o

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to this Form 10-K.     þ

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).     Yes o          No þ

     Based on the closing sale price of $6.46 of the registrant’s Common Stock as quoted on the Nasdaq National Market on June 30, 2003, the aggregate market value of such stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $20.2 million on that date. The number of shares outstanding of the Company’s Common Stock as of the closing of the market on February 13, 2004 was 5,244,450. The registrant does not have different classes of Common Stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

     Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders currently expected to be held on May 26, 2004, to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Report.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

Table of Contents

PART I

Forward-Looking Statements

      When used throughout this Annual Report, the words “believes,” “anticipates” and “expects” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to the many risks and uncertainties which affect the Company’s business, and actual results could differ materially from those projected and forecasted. These uncertainties, which include competition within the automobile finance industry, the effect of economic conditions, litigation risks and the availability of capital to finance planned growth, may not be limited to those we have identified and disclosed in this Annual Report. These and other factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements are discussed under the heading “Risk Factors.” Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements. Other than as may be required by law, the Company also undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect any future events or circumstances after the filing of this Annual Report.

General

      Onyx Acceptance Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, (“Onyx” or the “Company”) is a specialized consumer finance company engaged in the purchase, warehousing, securitization and servicing of motor vehicle retail installment contracts originated by franchised and select independent automobile dealerships (collectively the “Contracts”). The Company was founded in August 1993 by a team of executives with extensive automobile finance experience in the major aspects of prime and near-prime auto lending, including underwriting, servicing, information systems implementation, interest rate management, securitizations and auto dealer center management. The Company focuses its efforts on acquiring prime and near-prime Contracts collateralized by late model used and, to a lesser extent, new motor vehicles, entered into with purchasers whom the Company believes have a favorable credit profile. Since commencing the purchase, origination and servicing of Contracts in February 1994, the Company has purchased or originated approximately $10.3 billion in Contracts, has completed 34 securitizations and currently has an active dealer base of approximately 12,000 dealerships. The Company has expanded its operations from a single office in Orange County, California to 18 auto finance centers (the “Auto Finance Centers”) serving most regions of the United States.

Market and Competition

      The Company operates in a highly competitive market. The automobile finance market has historically been serviced by a variety of financial entities including the captive finance affiliates of major automotive manufacturers, banks, savings associations, independent finance companies, credit unions and leasing companies. A number of these competitors have greater financial resources than the Company. Many of these competitors also have long-standing relationships with automobile dealerships and may offer dealerships or their customers other forms of financing or services not provided by the Company.

      The Company competes for the purchase of Contracts which meet its underwriting criteria on the basis of emphasizing strong relationships with its dealership customer base through its local presence. The Company supports its dealership customer base with expanded service hours. The Company believes that its strong personal relationships with, and its level of service to, the dealerships in its customer base provide a competitive advantage to the Company.

3

Table of Contents

Business Strategy

      The Company’s principal objective is to become one of the leading sources of prime and near-prime auto lending in the United States by leveraging the experience of its senior management team in this industry. The Company seeks to maintain and increase profitability through the implementation of the following strategies:

      Targeted Market and Product Focus: The Company targets the prime and near-prime auto lending market because it believes that prime and near-prime lending produces greater origination and operating efficiency than does sub-prime lending. The Company focuses on late model used rather than new vehicles, as management believes the risk of loss on used vehicles is lower, due to lower depreciation rates, while interest rates are typically higher.

      Localized Dealership Service: The Company provides a high level of service to its dealership base by underwriting and purchasing Contracts and marketing to and servicing dealerships on a local level through its Auto Finance Centers. The Company strategically locates its Auto Finance Centers in geographic areas of high dealership concentration to facilitate personal service in the local markets, including consistent buying practices, expanded hours of operation, competitive rates, a dedicated dealer service staff, fast turnaround time and systems designed to expedite the processing of Contract applications. This personal service is provided by account managers (the “Account Managers”) with an established reputation for responsiveness and integrity who call on dealerships in a consistent and professional manner. The Company believes that its local presence and service provide the opportunity to build strong and lasting relationships with dealerships.

      Expansion of Dealership Customer Base: The Company establishes active relationships with a substantial percentage of franchised dealerships in the regions in which it does business through its Auto Finance Centers. The Company intends to establish additional relationships in 2004 and will open an additional Auto Finance Center in New York during the second quarter of 2004.

      Maintenance of Underwriting Standards and Portfolio Performance: The Company has developed an underwriting process that is designed to achieve attractive yields while minimizing delinquencies and losses. Based on its belief that a standardized commercially available credit scoring system is a less effective means of assessing credit risk, especially in the near-prime sector, the Company employs trained credit managers (the “Credit Managers”) in the local Auto Finance Centers to purchase Contracts satisfying the underwriting criteria developed by the Company. To assist in the underwriting process, the Company has developed an internal grading system that evaluates the borrower’s credit parameters and generates recommended advance and buy rates. Significant deviations from the suggested rates are investigated by the centralized Credit Audit Department. The Company’s Credit Managers and Account Managers are compensated as a team, and their compensation relies, in part, upon the quality of underwriting of the Contracts they approve. The Company has developed a credit review process where a post-funding audit is performed on many purchases and originations by reviewing Contracts against the Company’s underwriting standards within days after they have been funded. This audit provides feedback to enhance the underwriting process. To further monitor the integrity of the underwriting process, management regularly tracks the yields, delinquency and loss rates of Contracts purchased by each Credit and Account Manager team.

      Technology-Supported Operational Controls: The Company has developed and instituted control and review systems that enable it to monitor both the operations of the Company and the performance of the serviced portfolio. These risk management systems allow senior management to monitor Contract production, yields and performance on a real-time basis. The Company believes that its information systems not only enhance its internal controls but also allow it to significantly expand its serviced portfolio without a significant corresponding increase in its labor costs.

      Liquidity Through Warehousing and Securitizations: The Company’s strategy is to complete securitizations on a regular basis and to use warehouse credit facilities to fund Contracts prior to securitization. To fund dealer participation and finance daily operations, the Company relies on credit facilities that are collateralized by the Company’s retained interest in securitized assets (“RISA”), subordinated debt offerings and cash generated through operating activities. The Company has in the past also executed residual interest

4

Table of Contents

Operations

      Dealership Marketing and Service: As of December 31, 2003, the Company had 18 Auto Finance Centers located throughout the United States and had relationships with approximately 12,000 dealerships. Of these dealerships, approximately 86% are franchised and approximately 14% are independent automobile dealerships. The Company believes that franchised and select independent automobile dealerships are most likely to provide the Company with Contracts that meet the Company’s underwriting standards.

      The following table sets forth information about the Company’s Contracts and Auto Finance Centers as of the dates indicated:

      The Company’s objectives over the next 12 months are to expand its financing reach in metropolitan areas within the United States and to further develop relationships with existing franchised and select independent dealerships in the states where the Company is currently doing business. The Company plans to open a new Auto Finance Center in New York during the second quarter in 2004. The Company also created a centralized buying function in 2003 to service smaller markets that are currently not serviced by the Auto Finance Centers.

      The Account Managers work from the Auto Finance Centers to solicit, enroll and educate dealerships as well as to maintain relationships with the Company’s existing dealership customer base. Each Account Manager visits the dealership finance manager at each targeted dealership in his or her territory and presents information about the Company’s dealership services. The Company’s services include expanded service hours and the ability to rapidly respond to credit applications. The Account Managers educate the dealership finance managers about the Company’s underwriting philosophy, including its preference for prime and near-prime quality Contracts and its practice of using trained Credit Managers (rather than sole reliance upon computerized scoring systems) to review applications.

      The Account Managers also advise the dealership finance managers regarding the Company’s commitment to serve a broad scope of qualified borrowers through its prime and near-prime auto lending programs: the “Premier,” the “Preferred,” the “Standard” and the “Standard plus” Programs. The Premier Program allows the Company to market lower interest rates in order to capture customers of superior credit quality. The

5

Table of Contents

      The Company enters into a non-exclusive dealership agreement containing certain representations and warranties by the dealership about the Contracts. After this relationship is established, the Account Managers continue to actively monitor the relationship to meet the Company’s objectives with respect to the volume of applications satisfying the Company’s underwriting standards. Due to the non-exclusive nature of the Company’s relationships with dealerships, the dealerships retain discretion to determine whether to solicit financing from the Company or from another source or sources for a customer seeking to finance a vehicle purchase. The Account Managers regularly telephone and visit dealership finance managers to reinforce to them the Company’s objectives and to answer any questions they may have. To increase the effectiveness of these contacts, the Account Managers can obtain from the Company’s management information systems real-time information listing by dealership the number of applications submitted, the Company’s responses and the reasons why a particular application was rejected. The Company believes that the personal relationships its Account Managers, Credit Managers and Auto Finance Center Managers establish with the finance managers at the dealerships are a significant factor in creating and maintaining productive relationships with its dealership customer base.

Underwriting and Purchasing of Contracts

      The Company’s underwriting standards are applied by trained Credit and Account Managers with a personal, hands-on analysis of the creditworthiness of each applicant, rather than sole reliance upon standardized commercially available credit scoring systems used by several of the Company’s competitors. The Company believes that credit-scoring systems may approve applicants who are in fact not creditworthy, while denying credit to others who may have acceptable credit risk for the interest rate being charged. In addition, the Company believes that it can enhance the relationship with its dealership and consumer customer base by having its Credit and Account Managers utilize a rules/exception based automated credit and audit system. The Credit and Account Managers personally review each application and communicate to the submitting dealership the results of the review, including the reasons why a particular application may have been declined. This practice encourages the dealership finance managers to submit Contracts meeting the Company’s underwriting standards, thereby increasing the Company’s operating efficiency. In order to ensure consistent application of its underwriting standards as its volume of Contract purchases increases, the Company has a formal internal training program for new and existing Credit and Account Managers.

      The underwriting process begins when an application is either faxed or transmitted electronically from the dealership to the Company’s corporate headquarters where it is input or uploaded into the Company’s front-end application processing system. Each application is evaluated by a Credit or Account Manager in the assigned Auto Finance Center using uniform underwriting standards developed by the Company. These underwriting standards are intended to assess the applicant’s ability to timely repay all amounts due under the Contract and the adequacy of the financed vehicle as collateral. To evaluate credit applications, the Credit or Account Manager reviews, among other things, on-line information, including reports of credit reporting agencies, nationally recognized vehicle valuation services and ownership of real estate listed on an application. The Company has installed an in-house grading system to enhance its current underwriting standards. The system analyzes the applicant’s credit profile and collateral and produces recommended advance and buy rate guidelines. The system also performs additional fraud checks to alert the users of potential problems with the application. The system also verifies the overall Contract grade with the user’s credit limits, as each user is assigned a credit limit. If the application falls outside the user’s limits, the system will prompt the application to be reviewed by a higher user level. The system was installed to further enhance the enforcement of the Company’s credit policies and to monitor credit exceptions on a real-time basis. The Company’s wide area network permits a Credit or Account Manager in any Auto Finance Center to access an application on a real-time basis. This computer network enables senior management to efficiently review Contracts requiring senior approval and permits the Company to seamlessly shift underwriting work among its Auto Finance Centers to

6

Table of Contents

      The funds advanced by the Company to purchase a Contract generally do not exceed: (i) for a new financed vehicle, the dealer’s invoice plus taxes, title and license fees, any extended warranty and credit insurance; or (ii) for a used financed vehicle, the wholesale value assigned by a nationally recognized vehicle valuation service value guide, plus taxes, title and license fees, any extended warranty and credit insurance. However, the actual amount advanced for a Contract may be limited by a number of factors, including the length of the Contract term, the make, model and year of the financed vehicle and the creditworthiness of the obligor. These adjustments are made to insure that the financed vehicle constitutes adequate collateral to secure the Contract. Contracts purchased or originated in 2003 had an average loan to value ratio of 102%.

      Once the review of an application is completed, the Credit or Account Manager communicates the decision to the dealership specifying approval, conditional approval (for example, conditioned on an increase in the down payment, reduction in the term of the financing, or the addition of a co-signer to the Contract), or denial.

      The dealership is required to deliver the necessary documentation for each approved Contract to be purchased by the Company to the originating Auto Finance Center. The Company audits such documents for completeness and consistency with the application, providing final approval for the funding of the Contract once these requirements have been satisfied. The completed Contract file is then promptly forwarded to the corporate headquarters.

      The Auto Finance Center purchasing the Contract funds the purchase and may pay the dealer a fee in the form of dealer participation in the finance income. The dealership can receive 100% of the dealer participation, at purchase or at month-end, and the Company is entitled to recover from the dealership over the life of the Contract the unearned portion of the dealer participation in the event of a prepayment of the purchased Contract or a repossession or charge-off of the Contract. The Company also offers other participation methods, in which the Company pays less than 100% of the dealer participation, but for which the dealership is under no obligation to refund any unearned participation amount if the Contract defaults or prepays after the expiration of a set period of time after the Contract purchase date.

      The Company conducts a post-funding credit review of many of its Contracts through its centralized Credit Audit Department. In the review, the funded application is re-examined to ensure compliance with the Company’s underwriting requirements. As part of the post-funding review, a predetermined sampling of approximately one out of eight Contracts is selected for which the borrower is contacted to verify certain information on the Contract. The results are then reviewed by senior management to ensure consistent application of the Company’s underwriting standards.

      The Company employs a compensation system for its Credit Managers, Account Managers and Auto Finance Centers based on teams. The system is designed to reward those employees whose Contract purchases meet the Company’s volume and yield objectives while preserving credit quality. Generally, these bonuses are payable monthly and constitute a significant portion of an employee’s compensation. The Company believes this incentive compensation system motivates employees to purchase only those prime and near-prime quality Contracts that meet the Company’s objectives of increasing volume at targeted yields while preserving credit quality.

7

Table of Contents

      The following table sets forth information about the Company’s Contracts as of the dates indicated:

      Periodically, the Company performs an analysis of its serviced portfolio to evaluate the effectiveness of its underwriting guidelines. As external economic factors, credit delinquencies or credit losses change, the Company may adjust its underwriting guidelines and/or incentive compensation system to maintain the asset quality deemed acceptable by the Company’s management.

Servicing and Collection Procedures

      The Company services all Contracts in its serviced portfolio. The Company currently outsources its customer billing functions. Through a service provider, the Company mails to each obligor a monthly billing statement approximately 20 days prior to the due date. The Company believes this method has proven to be more effective in controlling delinquency, and therefore losses, than payment coupon books which are delivered to the obligor at the time the Contract is purchased. The Company charges a late fee, where allowed by law, on any payment received after the expiration of the applicable grace period. Most payments from obligors are deposited directly into a lockbox account while the remainder of payments are received directly by the Company.

      Under the terms of its credit facilities and securitization trusts, the Company acts as servicer with respect to all Contracts purchased or originated in its serviced portfolio. The Company receives servicing fees for servicing securitized Contracts equal to one percent per annum of the outstanding principal balance of such Contracts. The Company services the securitized Contracts by collecting payments due from obligors and remitting such payments to the trustee or agent in accordance with the terms of the servicing agreements. The Company maintains computerized records with respect to each Contract to record receipts and disbursements and to prepare related servicing reports.

Collection Procedures

      Collection activities with respect to delinquent Contracts are performed by the Company at its Foothill Ranch, California and Hazelwood, Missouri collection centers. Collection activities include prompt investigation and evaluation of the causes of any delinquency. An obligor is considered delinquent when he or she has failed to make at least 90% of a scheduled payment under the Contract within 30 days of the related due date.

      To automate its collection procedures, the Company uses features of its computer systems to provide tracking and notification of delinquencies. The collection system provides relevant obligor information (for example, current addresses, phone numbers and loan information) and records of all Contracts. The system also records an obligor’s promise to pay and provides supervisors the ability to review collection personnel activity and to modify collection priorities with respect to Contracts. The Company also utilizes a predictive dialing system to make phone calls to obligors whose payments are past due. The predictive dialer is a

8

Table of Contents

      Once an obligor is more seriously delinquent, these accounts are assigned to specific collectors at the Foothill Ranch or Hazelwood collection centers who have primary responsibility for such delinquent accounts until they are resolved. To expedite collections from late paying obligors, the Company uses several third party payment services which allow an obligor to remit payments which are in turn deposited to the Company’s lockbox accounts.

      Generally, after a scheduled payment under a Contract continues to be past due for between 45 and 60 days, the Company will initiate repossession of the financed vehicle. However, if a Contract is deemed uncollectible, if the financed vehicle is deemed by collection personnel to be in danger of being damaged, destroyed or made unavailable for repossession, or if the obligor voluntarily surrenders the financed vehicle, Onyx may recover it without regard to the length of payment delinquency. Repossessions are conducted by third parties that are engaged in the business of repossessing vehicles for secured parties. Under California law and the laws of most other states, after repossession, the obligor generally has an additional period of time to redeem the financed vehicle before the financed vehicle may be resold by the Company in an effort to recover the balance due under the Contract.

      If the proceeds from the sale of a repossessed vehicle fall short of the balance due on the Contract, the Company will experience a loss. The current policy of the Company is to recognize losses on repossessed vehicles in the month in which the vehicle is sold or in which a scheduled payment becomes 120 days delinquent, whichever occurs first. Losses may occur in connection with delinquent Contracts for which the vehicle was not repossessed, either because of a discharge of the obligor’s indebtedness in a bankruptcy proceeding or due to the Company’s inability to locate the financed vehicle or the obligor. In these cases, losses are recognized at the time a Contract is deemed uncollectible or during the month a scheduled payment under the Contract becomes 150 days past due, whichever occurs first.

      Upon repossession and sale of the financed vehicle, any deficiency remaining is pursued against the obligor to the extent deemed practical by the Company and to the extent permitted by law. The loss recognition and collection policies and practices of the Company may change over time in accordance with the business judgment of the Company’s management.

Modifications and Extensions

      The Company offers certain credit-related extensions to obligors. These extensions are offered only when the Company believes that the obligor’s financial difficulty has been resolved or will no longer impair the obligor’s ability to make future payments.

Insurance

      Each Contract requires the obligor to obtain comprehensive and collision insurance with respect to the related financed vehicle with the Company named as a loss payee. In the event that the obligor fails to maintain the required insurance, the Company has purchased limited comprehensive and collision insurance from Great American Insurance Companies. A portion of the policy provides the Company with protection on each uninsured or underinsured financed vehicle against total loss, damage or theft. In conjunction with the blanket coverage, the Company also has the ability to place month-to-month insurance certificates through Great American Insurance Companies on uninsured accounts whose Contracts allow for such placement. To further reduce its exposure to uninsured motorists, the Company operates an insurance tracking function at its corporate headquarters. This department systematically records cancellations, expirations and renewals and initiates contacts with both obligors and insurers to maximize compliance with Company policy.

9

Table of Contents

Financing and Sale of Contracts

      During 2003, the Company financed the acquisition and origination of Contracts primarily through its Triple-A CP Facility described below. As a means to improve liquidity, the Company expanded and diversified its lending lines with the execution of a $150.0 million warehouse facility sponsored by CDC Financial Products Inc. and guaranteed by XL Capital Assurance Inc., in January 2003, as further discussed below (the “CDC CP Facility”). The Triple-A CP Facility and the CDC CP Facility are collectively referred to as the “CP Facilities”.

      CP Facilities: As of December 31, 2003, the Company was party to two warehouse facilities. The Company’s primary warehouse facility was a $300 million facility (the “Triple-A CP Facility”), with Triple-A One Funding Corporation (“Triple-A”). Onyx Acceptance Financial Corporation (“Finco”), a special purpose subsidiary of the Company, is the borrower under the Triple-A CP Facility. The Triple-A CP Facility is used to fund the purchase or origination of Contracts. Triple-A is a rated commercial paper asset-backed conduit sponsored by MBIA Insurance Corporation (“MBIA”). MBIA provides credit enhancement for the facility by issuing a financial guarantee insurance policy covering all principal and interest obligations owed for the borrowings under the facility. The Company pledges certain of its Contracts held for sale to borrow from Triple-A. The Triple-A CP Facility was renewed in November 2001 for a three-year term, subject to annual renewals by liquidity providers. During 2003, the size of the Triple-A CP Facility was reduced from $355.0 million to $300.0 million in conjunction with the acquisition of the CDC CP Facility.

      In January 2003, a subsidiary of the Company, Onyx Acceptance Receivables Corporation (“OARC”), executed a $150 million warehouse facility with CDC Financial Products Inc. (“CDC”) which provides warehouse funding for the purchase or origination of Contracts and has been used in concert with the Triple-A CP Facility. XL Capital Assurance Inc. provides credit enhancement for the facility by issuing a financial guarantee insurance policy covering all principal and interest obligations owed for borrowings under the facility. The Company pledges certain of its Contracts held for sale to borrow under the CDC CP Facility. The CDC CP Facility was renewed and expanded to $300 million in January 2004 with the addition of another lending group. The facility is now set to expire in January 2005.

      The Company finances dealer participation payments and daily operations principally through credit facilities collateralized by its retained interest in securitized assets, proceeds from subordinated debt offerings, and cash from operating activities.

      The Residual Lines: As of December 31, 2003, the Company, through a special purpose subsidiary of the Company, Onyx Acceptance Funding Corporation (“Fundco”), had two residual financing facilities: a $35 million line with Merrill Lynch International, as buyer (“MLI”), and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., as agent (“Merrill”), and a $21.4 million facility with Credit Suisse First Boston (Europe) Limited, as buyer (“CSFB-Europe”), and Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation, as agent (“CSFB”). The MLI facility was executed in April 2003, and replaced a $50.0 million residual line with Salomon Smith Barney Realty Corporation (“SBRC”). Each loan under the MLI line has a nine-month revolver period followed by a twelve-month amortization period. The CSFB-Europe line was renewed in October 2003, at which time the facility size was reduced from $35 million to $21.4 million, until January 2004. In January 2004, the line was extended through April 2004 as a $20 million facility. The Company expects to renew the line at the $20 million level for another year at that time. The reductions in the CSFB-Europe line were related to the Company entering into a $30 million residual financing facility with Galleon Capital, LLC (“Galleon”), in January 2004. (The Galleon facility together with the MLI facility and the CSFB-Europe facility are sometimes referred to herein as the “Residual Lines”). The Galleon facility provides for a twelve-month revolving period followed by an accelerated amortization period.

      Residual Securitizations: As an additional source of funds, the Company has utilized residual securitizations to increase the Company’s liquidity. During the first quarter of 2000, the Company securitized the residual cash flows from 15 of its then outstanding securitizations. The proceeds of this transaction were used by the Company to pay down two residual financing facilities and pay off another residual financing facility. The Company refinanced this residual securitization in the amount of $21.0 million during the second quarter of 2002 and in the amount of $9.2 million during the fourth quarter of 2002. During the first quarter of 2002,

10

Table of Contents

      Subordinated Debt: As of December 31, 2003, the Company had outstanding approximately $51.1 million of subordinated debt, $12.0 million of which has a stated interest rate of 12.5% and a maturity of June 2006. The remaining balance of $39.1 million was raised through the Company’s renewable unsecured subordinated note program launched during the first quarter of 2002. The weighted average interest rate on the balance of the renewable notes outstanding as of December 31, 2003 was approximately 8.5%. The renewable notes have varying maturities ranging from three months to ten years.

      The facilities and lines above contain affirmative, negative and financial covenants typical of such credit facilities. The Company was in compliance with these covenants as of December 31, 2003.

      Hedging and Interest Rate Risk Management: The Company employs a hedging strategy that is intended to minimize the risk of interest rate fluctuations, and which historically has involved the execution of forward interest rate swaps or use of a pre-funding structure for the Company’s securitizations. The Company is not required to maintain collateral on the outstanding hedging program, until the point where the fair value of the swap declines below ($1.0) million.

      Securitization: Regular Contract securitizations are an integral part of the Company’s business plan because they allow the Company to increase its liquidity, provide for redeployment of its capital and reduce risks associated with interest rate fluctuations. The Company has developed a securitization program that involves selling interests in pools of its Contracts to investors through the public issuance of AAA/ Aaa rated asset-backed securities. The Company completed four AAA/ Aaa rated publicly underwritten asset-backed securitizations in the total amount of $1.6 billion in 2003.

      The net proceeds of these securitizations are used to pay down outstanding indebtedness incurred under the Company’s warehouse credit facilities used to purchase Contracts, thereby creating availability for the purchase of additional Contracts. Through December 31, 2003, the Company had securitized approximately $10.0 billion of Contracts in 34 separate transactions. In each of its securitizations, the Company sold its Contracts to a newly formed grantor or owner trust, which issued certificates or notes in an amount equal to the aggregate principal balance of the Contracts.

      To improve the level of profitability from the sale of securitized Contracts, the Company arranges for credit enhancement to achieve an improved credit rating on the asset-backed securities issued. This credit enhancement has taken the form of a financial guaranty insurance policy (the “Financial Guarantee Insurance Policy”) insuring the payment of principal and interest due on the asset-backed securities.

      The Company receives servicing fees for its duties relating to the accounting for and collection of the Contracts. In addition, the Company is entitled to the future excess cash flows arising from the trusts. Generally, the Company sells the Contracts at face value and without recourse, except that certain representations and warranties with respect to the Contracts are provided by the Company as the servicer and Finco as the seller to the trusts.

      Gains on sale of Contracts arising from securitizations provide a significant portion of the Company’s revenues. Several factors affect the Company’s ability to complete securitizations of its Contracts, including conditions in the securities markets generally, conditions in the asset-backed securities market specifically, the credit quality of the Company’s portfolio of Contracts and the Company’s ability to obtain credit enhancement.

Government Regulation

      The Company is subject to regulation, supervision, and licensing under various federal, state and local statutes, ordinances and regulations, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Company is required to comply with the laws of those states in which it conducts operations. Management believes that it is in compliance with these laws and regulations.

11

Table of Contents

      Consumer Protection Laws: Numerous federal and state consumer protection laws and related regulations impose substantial requirements upon lenders and servicers involved in consumer finance. These laws include the Truth-in-Lending Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, the Federal Reserve Board’s Regulations B and Z, states’ adaptations of the Uniform Consumer Credit Code and of the Uniform Commercial Code (the “UCC”), state and federal privacy laws and state motor vehicle retail installment sales acts and other similar laws. These laws, among other things, require the Company to provide certain disclosures to applicants, prohibit misleading advertising and protect against discriminatory financing or unfair credit and collection practices. The Truth-in-Lending Act and Regulation Z promulgated thereunder require disclosure of, among other things, the payment schedule, the finance charge, the amount financed, the total of payments and the annual percentage rate charged on each retail installment contract. The Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and similar state laws, prohibit creditors from discriminating against credit applicants (including retail installment contract obligors) on the basis of specific enumerated criteria. Creditors are also required to make certain disclosures regarding consumer rights and advise consumers whose credit applications are not approved. The rules of the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) limit the types of property a creditor may accept as collateral to secure a consumer obligation, and its holder in due course rule provides for the preservation of the consumer’s claims and defenses when a consumer obligation is assigned to a holder. With respect to used vehicles specifically, the FTC’s rule on Sale of Used Vehicles requires that all sellers of used vehicles prepare, complete and display a Buyer’s Guide which explains any applicable warranty coverage for such vehicles. Also, some state laws impose finance charge ceilings and other restrictions on consumer transactions and require contract disclosures in addition to those required under federal law. These requirements impose specific statutory liabilities upon creditors who fail to comply with their provisions. In some cases these provisions, if violated, could affect the Company’s ability to enforce the Contracts it purchases or originates.

Employees

      The Company employs personnel experienced in all areas of loan origination, documentation, collection and administration. The Company employs and trains specialists in loan processing and servicing with minimal crossover of duties. At December 31, 2003, the Company had 917 full-time employees, none of whom were covered by collective bargaining agreements. The Company believes it has good relationships with its employees.

BUSINESS RISKS

      You should carefully consider the following risks in your evaluation of us and our common stock. The risks and uncertainties described below may not be the only ones facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, credit, economic, competitive, governmental and financial factors affecting our operations, markets, financial products, and services and other factors discussed in our future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission may also adversely impact and impair our business. If any of these risks actually occur, our business, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition would likely suffer. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of the money you paid to buy our common stock.

We Need Substantial Liquidity.

      We require a substantial amount of liquidity to operate our business. Among other things, we use such liquidity to:

	•	acquire Contracts;
	•	pay dealer participation;
	•	pay securitization costs and fund related accounts;
	•	settle hedge transactions;

12

Table of Contents

	•	satisfy working capital requirements and pay operating expenses; and
	•	pay interest expense.

      A substantial portion of our revenues in any period is represented by the gain on sale of Contracts generated by a securitization in such period, but the cash underlying such revenues is received over the life of the Contracts.

      We have historically operated on a negative cash flow basis. We generated positive cash flow beginning in the fourth quarter of 2003, and will likely continue to remain cash flow positive on a quarterly basis, provided the volume of Contract purchases remains steady on an annual basis. We have historically funded negative operating cash flows principally through borrowings from financial institutions, sales of equity securities and sales of subordinated notes. We cannot assure you, however, that (1) we will remain cash flow positive, (2) we will have access to the capital markets in the future for equity, debt issuances or securitizations, or (3) financing through borrowings or other means will be available on acceptable terms to satisfy our cash requirements. If we are unable to access the capital markets or obtain acceptable financing, our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows would be materially and adversely affected. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

We Depend on Warehouse Financing.

      We depend on warehouse facilities with financial institutions to finance the purchase or origination of Contracts pending securitization. Our business strategy requires that such financing continue to be available during the warehousing period.

      Whether the CP Facilities continue to be available to us depends on, among other things, whether we maintain a target net yield for the Contracts financed under the CP Facilities and comply with certain financial covenants contained in the sale and servicing agreements between us, as seller, and our respective wholly-owned special purpose subsidiary, Finco or OARC, as purchaser. These financial covenants include:

	•	a minimum ratio of net worth plus subordinated debt to total assets;
	•	a maximum ratio of credit enhancement assets to tangible net worth; and
	•	an earnings before interest, depreciation and taxes coverage ratio.

      We cannot assure you that our CP Facilities will be available to us or that they will be available on favorable terms. If we are unable to arrange new warehousing credit facilities or extend our existing credit facilities when they expire, our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.

We Depend on Residual Financing.

      When we sell our Contracts in securitizations, we receive cash and a residual interest in the securitized assets (“RISA”). The RISA represents the future cash flows to be generated by the Contracts in excess of the interest paid on the securities issued in the securitization and other costs of servicing the Contracts and completing the securitization. (See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Securitizations”). We typically use the RISA from each securitization as collateral to borrow cash under our Residual Lines to finance our operations. The amount of cash advanced by our lenders under our Residual Lines depends on a collateral formula that is determined in large part by how well our securitized Contracts perform. If our portfolio of securitized Contracts experience a higher delinquency and loss ratios than expected, then the amount of money we can borrow under the Residual Lines would be reduced. The reduction in availability under these Residual Lines could materially and adversely affect our operations, financial condition and cash flows. Additionally, we are subject, under the documentation governing the Residual Lines, to certain financial covenants. During the year, the Company recorded a $8.6 million write-down of the Company’s RISA asset stemming from higher than expected losses and delinquency on certain securitizations.

13

Table of Contents

We Depend on Securitizations to Generate Revenue.

      We rely significantly upon securitizations to generate cash proceeds for repayment of our warehouse and our residual credit facilities and to create availability to purchase additional Contracts. Further, gain on sale of Contracts generated by our securitizations represents a significant portion of our revenues. Our ability to complete securitizations of our Contracts is affected by the following factors, among other things:

	•	conditions in the securities markets generally;
	•	conditions in the asset-backed securities market specifically;
	•	the credit quality of our portfolio of Contracts; and
	•	our ability to obtain credit enhancement.

      If we were unable to profitably securitize a sufficient number of our Contracts in a particular financial reporting period, then our revenues for such period could decline and could result in lower net income or a loss for such period. In addition, unanticipated delays in closing a securitization could also increase our interest rate risk by increasing the warehousing period for our Contracts. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition — Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

We Depend on Credit Enhancement.

      From inception through December 31, 2003, each of our securitizations has utilized credit enhancement in the form of a financial guarantee insurance policy in order to achieve “AAA/ Aaa” ratings. This form of credit enhancement reduces the cost of the securitizations relative to alternative forms of credit enhancement currently available to us. We cannot assure you that:

	•	we will be able to continue to obtain credit enhancement in any form from our current providers;
	•	we will be able to obtain credit enhancement from any other provider of credit enhancement on acceptable terms; or
	•	future securitizations will be similarly rated.

      We also rely on financial guarantee insurance policies to reduce our borrowing cost under the CP Facilities. If our current providers’ credit ratings are downgraded or if they withdraw the credit enhancement, we could be subject to higher interest costs for our future securitizations and financing costs during the warehousing period. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

We Are Subject to Interest Rate Fluctuations.

      Our profitability is largely determined by the difference, or “spread,” between the effective rate of interest received by us on the Contracts acquired and the interest rates payable under our credit facilities during the warehousing period and for securities issued in securitizations.

      Several factors affect our ability to manage interest rate risk. First, the Contracts are purchased or originated at fixed interest rates, while amounts borrowed under our credit facilities bear interest at variable rates that are subject to frequent adjustment to reflect prevailing rates for short-term borrowings. Our policy is to increase the buy rates we issue to dealerships in response to increases in our cost of funds during the warehousing period. However, there is generally a time lag before such increased borrowing costs can be offset by increases in the buy rates for Contracts and, in certain instances, the rates charged by our competitors may limit our ability to pass through our increased costs of warehouse financing.

      Second, the spread can be adversely affected after a Contract is purchased or originated and while it is held during the warehousing period by increases in the prevailing rates in the commercial paper markets. While the CP Facilities permit us to select maturities to coincide with the projected end of the warehouse period, if we selected a shorter maturity or have a delay in completing a securitization, we would face this risk.

14

Table of Contents

      Third, the interest rate demanded by investors in securitizations is a function of prevailing market rates for comparable transactions and the general interest rate environment. Because the Contracts purchased or originated by us have fixed rates, we bear the risk of spreads narrowing because of interest-rate increases during the period from the date the Contracts are purchased until the pricing of our securitization of such Contracts. We employ a hedging strategy that is intended to minimize this risk and which historically has involved the execution of forward interest rate swaps or use of a pre-funding structure for our securitizations. However, we cannot assure you that this strategy will consistently or completely offset adverse interest-rate movements during the warehousing period or that we will not sustain losses on hedging transactions. Our hedging strategy requires estimates by management of monthly Contract acquisition volume and timing of our securitizations. If such estimates are significantly inaccurate, then our gains on sales of Contracts, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.

      We also have exposure to interest rate fluctuations under the Residual Lines. In periods of increasing interest rates, our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

      In addition, we have some interest rate exposure to falling interest rates to the extent that the interest rates charged on Contracts sold in a securitization with a pre-funding structure decline below the rates prevailing at the time that the securitization prices. Such a rate decline would reduce the interest rate spread because the interest rate on the notes and/or the certificates would remain fixed. This would negatively impact the gain on sale of Contracts and our results of operations and cash flows.

We Will Be Adversely Affected When Contracts are Prepaid or Defaulted.

      Our results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and liquidity depend, to a material extent, on the performance of Contracts purchased, originated, warehoused, and securitized by us. A portion of the Contracts acquired by us may default or prepay during the warehousing period. We bear the risk of losses resulting from payment defaults during the warehousing period. In the event of payment default, the collateral value of the financed vehicle may not cover the outstanding Contract balance and costs of recovery. We maintain an allowance for credit losses on Contracts held for investment, which reflects management’s estimates of anticipated credit losses during such period. If the allowance is inadequate, then we would recognize as an expense the losses in excess of such allowance, and our results of operations could be adversely affected. In addition, under the terms of the CP Facilities, we are not able to borrow against defaulted Contracts.

      Our servicing income can also be adversely affected by prepayments of or defaults under Contracts in the serviced portfolio. Our contractual servicing revenue is based on a percentage of the outstanding principal balance of such Contracts. Thus, if Contracts are prepaid or charged-off, then our servicing revenue will decline to the extent of such prepaid or charged-off Contracts.

      The gain on sale of Contracts recognized by us in each securitization and the value of the RISA in each transaction reflects management’s estimate of future credit losses and prepayments for the Contracts included in such securitization. If actual rates of credit loss or prepayments, or both, on such Contracts exceed those estimated, the value of the RISA would be impaired. We periodically review our credit loss and prepayment assumptions relative to the performance of the securitized Contracts and to market conditions. Our results of operations and liquidity could be adversely affected if credit loss or prepayment levels on securitized Contracts substantially exceed anticipated levels. Under certain circumstances, we would be required to record an impairment charge through a reduction to gain-on-sale. Further, an impairment of RISA could reduce the amount available to us under our Residual Lines, thus possibly requiring us to pay down amounts outstanding under these facilities or provide additional collateral to cure any borrowing base deficiency.

      During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company recorded an impairment loss of $8.6 million compared to $15.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The impairments principally reflect the adverse performance of securitizations executed during 1999 and 2000, stemming from higher than expected losses and delinquency.

15

Table of Contents

Effects of Terrorist Attacks and Military Response.

      The long-term economic impact of the events of September 11, 2001 and the United States’ continuing military response, remain uncertain, but could have a material effect on general economic conditions, consumer confidence and market liquidity. No assurance can be given as to the effect of these events on the performance of the Contracts. Any adverse impact resulting from these events could materially affect our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

      In addition, activation of a substantial number of U.S. military reservists or members of the National Guard may significantly increase the proportion of Contracts whose interest rates are reduced by the application of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (the “Relief Act”, which amends and replaces the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940). The Relief Act provides, generally, that an obligor who is covered by the Relief Act may not be charged interest on the related Contract in excess of 6% annually during the period of the obligor’s active duty.

We Will Be Adversely Affected If We Lose Servicing Rights.

      Our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows would be materially and adversely affected if any of the following were to occur:

	•	loss of the servicing rights under our sale and servicing agreements for the CP Facilities; or
	•	loss of the servicing rights under the applicable sale and servicing agreement of an owner trust.

      We are entitled to receive servicing income only while we act as servicer under the applicable sale and servicing agreement. Under the CP Facilities, our right to act as servicer can be terminated by our lender or financial insurer upon the occurrence of certain events.

Our Quarterly Earnings May Fluctuate.

      Our revenues have fluctuated in the past and are expected to fluctuate in the future principally as a result of the following factors:

	•	the timing and size of our securitizations;
	•	the performance of our serviced portfolio;
	•	variations in the volume of our Contract acquisitions;
	•	the interest rate spread between our cost of funds and the average interest rate of purchased Contracts;
	•	the effectiveness of our hedging strategies;
	•	the investor rate for securitizations; and
	•	a trigger event that would block release of excess cash flows from a securitization trust’s spread account.

      Any significant decrease in our quarterly revenues could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and stock price.

We Depend on Key Personnel.

      Our future operating results depend in significant part upon the continued service of our key senior management personnel, none of whom is bound by an employment agreement. Our future operating results also depend in part upon our ability to attract and retain qualified management, technical, sales and support personnel for our operations. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in attracting or retaining such personnel. The loss of any key employee, the failure of any key employee to perform in his or her current position or our inability to attract and retain skilled employees, as needed, could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

16

Table of Contents

Our Industry is Highly Competitive.

      Competition in the field of financing retail motor vehicle sales is intense. The automobile finance market is highly fragmented and historically has been serviced by a variety of financial entities including the captive finance affiliates of major automotive manufacturers, as well as banks, savings associations, independent finance companies, credit unions and leasing companies. Several of these competitors have greater financial resources than we do. Many of these competitors also have long-standing relationships with automobile dealerships and offer dealerships or their customers other forms of financing or services not provided by us. Our ability to compete successfully depends largely upon our relationships with dealerships and the willingness of dealerships to offer those Contracts that meet our underwriting criteria to us for purchase. We cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to compete successfully in the markets we serve.

We May Be Harmed by Adverse Economic Conditions.

      We are a motor vehicle consumer auto finance company whose activities are dependent upon the sale of motor vehicles. Our ability to continue to acquire Contracts in the markets in which we operate and to expand into additional markets is dependent upon the overall level of sales of new and used motor vehicles in those markets. A prolonged downturn in the sale of new and used motor vehicles, whether nationwide or in the California market, could have a material adverse impact upon us, our results of operations and our ability to implement our business strategy.

      The automobile industry generally is sensitive to adverse economic conditions both nationwide and in California, where we have our largest single-state exposure. Periods of rising interest rates, reduced economic activity or higher rates of unemployment generally result in a reduction in the rate of sales of motor vehicles and higher default rates on motor vehicle contracts. We cannot assure you that such economic conditions will not occur, or that such conditions will not result in severe reductions in our revenues or the cash flows available to us to permit us to remain current on our credit facilities.

We Are Subject to System Risks.

      In July 2001, the Company converted from an external service provider for its loan accounting and collections system to an in-house system. If issues with the in-house system arise in the future, we may be unable to acquire Contracts and service the outstanding portfolio. The failure of this system could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

We Are Subject to Many Regulations.

      Our business is subject to numerous federal and state consumer protection laws and regulations, which, among other things:

	•	require us to comply with certain requirements due to our being a publicly traded company;
	•	require us to obtain and maintain certain licenses and qualifications;
	•	limit the interest rates, fees and other charges we are allowed to charge;
	•	limit or prescribe certain other terms of our Contracts;
	•	require us to protect the privacy of consumer information;
	•	require specific disclosures; and
	•	define our rights to repossess and sell collateral.

      We believe that we are in compliance, in all material respects, with all such laws and regulations, and that such laws and regulations have had no material adverse effect on our ability to operate our business. However, we will be materially and adversely affected if we fail to comply with:

	•	applicable laws and regulations;

17

Table of Contents

	•	changes in existing laws or regulations;
	•	changes in the interpretation of existing laws or regulations; or
	•	any additional laws or regulations that may be enacted in the future.

We Are Subject to Litigation Risks.

      We are party to various legal proceedings, similar to actions brought against other companies in the motor vehicle finance industry and other businesses. Companies in the motor vehicle finance industry have also been named as defendants in an increasing number of class action lawsuits brought by purchasers of motor vehicles and others claiming violation of various federal and state consumer credit, as well as similar and other, laws and regulations.

      While we intend to vigorously defend ourselves against such proceedings, there is a chance that our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected by unfavorable outcomes.

      The Company did not own any real property at December 31, 2003. The Company leases approximately 82,000 square feet of office space for its headquarters located in Foothill Ranch, California. The Company also leases office space for its Auto Finance Centers and its Hazelwood, Missouri collection center. The average size of an Auto Finance Center is generally four to five thousand square feet. The Hazelwood collection center is approximately 20,000 square feet. One Auto Finance Center is located in the corporate headquarters building.

      As a consumer finance company, the Company is subject to various consumer claims and litigation seeking damages and statutory penalties based upon, among other things, disclosure inaccuracies and wrongful repossession, which could take the form of a plaintiff’s class action complaint. The Company, as the assignee of finance Contracts originated by dealers, may also be named as a co-defendant in lawsuits filed by consumers principally against dealers. Finally, the Company also is subject to other litigation common to the motor vehicle finance industry and businesses in general. The damages and penalties claimed by consumers and others in these types of matters can be substantial. The relief requested by the plaintiffs varies but includes requests for compensatory, statutory and punitive damages.

      Management believes that the Company has taken prudent steps to address the litigation risks associated with the Company’s business activities. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully defend against all such claims or that the determination of any such claim in a manner adverse to the Company would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s automobile finance business.

      At the present time, the Company is party only to ordinary routine litigation, incidental to its business, which the Company expects will be resolved without any material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

      No matters were submitted during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.

18

Table of Contents

PART II

      The Company’s Common Stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “ONYX.” The following table provides quarterly high and low closing prices for the Company’s Common Stock for the years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002.

      At March 15, 2004, there were approximately 1,072 beneficial holders of the Company’s Common Stock.

Dividend Policy

      The Company’s ability to pay or declare dividends is subject to compliance with the terms of certain of its credit facilities. As of December 31, 2003, the Company has never paid dividends.

19

Table of Contents

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

      The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere herein.

20

Table of Contents

(1)	Prior to April 1, 2001, income generated from RISA was included as a component of service fee income. Additionally, certain amounts in the prior years’ consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2003 presentation.
(2)	The provision for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2002 reflects a sales tax refund of approximately $2.0 million. The refund has been treated as a recovery as it relates to pro-rata sales taxes paid by the Company in financing the purchases of vehicles for which the related Contracts have been previously charged-off.
(3)	Averages are based on daily balances.
(4)	The weighted averages are based on the serviced portfolio outstanding at the end of the period.
(5)	Excludes repossessed inventory and accounts in bankruptcy.
(6)	Contracts held for sale and Contracts held for investment exclude dealer participation, allowance for credit losses and loan premium. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(7)	As discussed in note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has restated certain balance sheet information for the years 1999 through 2002 to properly record the cut-off of cash transactions related to trust activity around each respective year end.

Overview

      Onyx is a specialized consumer finance company engaged in the purchase, warehousing, securitization and servicing of Contracts originated by franchised and select independent automobile dealerships in the United States. The Company focuses its efforts on acquiring Contracts that are collateralized by late model used and, to a lesser extent, new automobiles, that are entered into with purchasers whom the Company believes have a favorable credit profile. Since commencing the purchase of Contracts in February 1994, the Company has acquired more than $10.3 billion in Contracts and currently has relationships with approximately 12,000 dealerships. The Company has expanded its operations from a single office in California to 18 Auto Finance Centers serving many regions of the United States.

      The Company generates revenues primarily through the purchase, origination, warehousing, subsequent securitization and ongoing servicing of Contracts. The Company earns net interest income on Contracts held during the warehousing period. Upon the securitization and sale of Contracts, the Company recognizes a gain on sale of Contracts, receives future excess cash flows generated by securitization trusts and earns fees from servicing the securitized Contracts.

21

Table of Contents

      The following table illustrates the changes in the Company’s Contract acquisition volume, total revenue, securitization activity and serviced portfolio during the past three fiscal years.

Selected Financial Information

(1)	Total revenue is comprised of net interest income, service fee income and gain on sale of contracts.

Contracts Purchased and Serviced Portfolio

      In an effort to improve borrower credit statistics, the Company modified its incentive compensation system during the fourth quarter of 2000 to shift its purchases of Contracts to a greater percentage of higher credit quality product. The result has been increased credit scores, slower volume growth and an improvement in overall borrower statistics. Contract purchases, since the modification of the Company’s compensation system, have remained stable and have resulted in a general stabilization of the Company’s serviced portfolio. The serviced portfolio at December 31, 2000, was $2.7 billion compared to $2.9 billion at December 31, 2001, $2.9 billion at December 31, 2002 and $2.8 billion at December 31, 2003.

      With Contract purchases stable, management has continued to focus its efforts on reviewing and utilizing automation tools to assist in the underwriting and credit review processes. The resulting enhancements to the front-end credit decision processes have improved the speed of the decision and the amount of information available to the Credit and Account Managers. Management has also enhanced the post-funding review process of the underwriting decision so that the process is more automated and can be customized to select and analyze Contracts meeting specific criteria.

Critical Accounting Policies

      Credit Enhancement Assets: SFAS 140 requires that following a transfer of financial assets, an entity is to recognize the assets it controls and the liabilities it has incurred, and derecognize assets for which control has been surrendered and liabilities that have been extinguished.

      RISA represents the present value of the estimated future cash flows to be received by the Company from the excess spread created in securitization transactions. Excess spread is calculated by taking the difference between the weighted average coupon rate of the Contracts sold and the weighted average security rate paid to the investors less contractually specified servicing and guarantor fees and projected credit losses, after giving effect to estimated prepayments. The estimates that management makes during the execution of the securitization relate to the expected prepayment rate of the Contracts in the transaction, the discount rate to be applied to the cash flows and the amount and timing of cumulative net losses that will be experienced from the Contracts that are sold in the transaction. As these estimates are made at the inception of the transaction, they will have a degree of uncertainty as the transaction ages. A major variable to these estimates

22

Table of Contents

      RISA is classified in a manner similar to available for sale assets and as such is marked to market each quarter. Market value changes are calculated by discounting the estimated cash flows using a current market discount rate. Each quarter management reviews its estimates of the cash flows and adjusts any that are inconsistent with its current estimates. If the effect of the new estimates reduces the present value of the cash flows and if the fair market value has declined below the carrying amount of the transaction, management will record an impairment loss on the transaction. If the new estimated present value has declined but the carrying amount remains below the fair value, any change in the market value of the RISA is reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity on the consolidated statements of financial condition as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of applicable taxes.

      Hedging Activities: The Contracts originated and held by us earn interest at a fixed rate and, accordingly, we have exposure to changes in interest rates during the warehouse period. We therefore employ a hedging strategy that is intended to minimize the risk of interest rate fluctuations. Such transactions involve the execution of forward interest rate swaps and/or the use of a pre-funding structure for securitizations.

      Management monitors the hedging activities on a frequent basis to ensure that the value of hedges, their correlation to the Contracts being hedged and the amounts being hedged continue to provide effective protection against interest rate risk. Our hedging strategy requires estimates of monthly Contract acquisition volume and of the timing of securitizations. The amount and timing of hedging transactions are determined by senior management and are based upon the amount of Contracts purchased and the interest rate environment.

      The Company uses forward interest rate swaps to hedge the variability in the forecasted future net cash flows it will receive from the eventual securitization of the Contracts held for sale. The Company’s interest rate swap agreements involve arrangements to pay a fixed interest rate and receive a floating interest rate, at specified intervals, calculated on agreed-upon amortizing notional amounts. The debt and amounts that the Company hedges are determined based on prevailing market conditions and the current shape of the yield curve. Interest rate swap agreements are executed as an integral part of specific securitization transactions. Interest rate swap agreements are unwound upon securitization, whereby the gain or loss on the hedge is recorded to income and the associated component of the gain or loss previously recorded in other comprehensive income is reversed. As of December 31, 2003, the Company had $150 million of forward interest rate swaps outstanding with an AA-rated counterparty.

      Derivative instruments used by Onyx involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in the event a counterparty should default and market risk as the instruments are subject to rate and price fluctuations. Credit risk is managed through the use of credit standard guidelines, counterparty diversification, monitoring of counterparty financial condition and International Swap Dealers Association master netting agreements in place with all derivative counterparties.

      All derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value. On the date that the Company enters into a derivative contract, it designates the derivative as a hedge of a forecasted transaction of the variability of cash flows that are to be received or paid in connection with the securitization (a “cash flow” hedge). Changes in the fair value of a derivative that are highly effective and previously designated to qualify as a cash flow hedge, to the extent that the hedge is effective, are recorded in other comprehensive income until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows of the hedged transaction (e.g., until periodic settlements of a variable asset or liability are recorded in earnings). Any hedge ineffectiveness (which represents the amount by which the changes in the fair value of the derivative exceed the variability in the cash flows of the forecasted transaction) is recorded in current-period earnings.

23

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

     Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

      The Company had net income of $5.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, compared to net income of $1.9 million and $4.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The increase in net income for the year was principally due to an increase in net gains realized on securitizations to $26.9 million in 2003 from $13.7 million and $30.8 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively. From year-end 2001 to December 31, 2003, the Company has experienced a significant reduction in its overall delinquency rates; however, certain pre-2001 securitizations experienced higher losses and delinquency than projected at the inception of the transactions. As a result, the Company recorded impairment charges of $8.6 million, $15.1 million and $3.3 million during the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. No impairment charges were recorded during the fourth quarter of 2003.

      Net Interest Income. Net interest income consists primarily of (1) the difference between the finance revenue earned on Contracts held on balance sheet during the warehousing period and the interest costs associated with the Company’s borrowings to purchase such Contracts; (2) the difference between income accreted on RISA and the interest costs associated with residual line borrowings secured by RISA and (3) interest and amortized fees charged in connection with the Company’s subordinated financings, capital lease obligations and the costs associated with hedging activities under the guidelines of FAS 133.

      Net interest income increased to $24.7 million for 2003, from $22.2 million during 2002, and from $10.1 million during 2001. The increases were principally due to an increase in interest income generated from the Company’s RISA and a corresponding decrease in interest expense incurred on the Company’s Residual Lines and CP Facilities. For the year ended December 31, 2003 total income recognized on the RISA was approximately $23.4 million, versus approximately $21.3 million for the same period in 2002 and $8.4 million for 2001. Prior to April 1, 2001, income generated from RISA was included as a component of service fee income. The weighted average effective yield recognized on the RISA asset during 2003 was 13.3% versus 12.0% for 2002 and 6.7% for 2001. The increase in yield for 2003 and 2002 was principally due to lower credit losses and better overall performance on the Company’s securitizations executed after 2000, versus original projections made at the time of sale. The Company has increased the fair value on certain of its outstanding securitization transactions through other comprehensive income on the statement of financial condition. The increase is principally due to the improved loss performance of certain securitization transactions, and will result in higher earnings on the RISA assets in future quarters.

      Interest expense associated with borrowings under residual lines secured by RISA totaled approximately $3.3 million for the year, compared to $7.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 and $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. The reduction in interest expense during 2003 was mainly due to the clean-up call executed on the $75.0 million 2002-A residual securitization in August 2003. Total commercial paper interest expense for the year was $4.3 million, compared to $4.5 million and $10.2 million for the same periods in 2002 and 2001, respectively. The weighted average interest rate paid on the Company’s commercial paper line exclusive of amortized fees, for the year ended December 31, 2003 was approximately 1.2%, compared to 1.7% and 6.2% for 2002 and 2001, respectively.

      Other Interest Expense. Other interest expense was $7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, compared to $4.3 million and $2.9 million for the same periods in 2002 and 2001, respectively. Other interest expense includes interest and amortized fees on the Company’s subordinated financings, capital lease obligations and the costs associated with hedging activities under the guidelines of FAS 133. The increase in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2002 and 2003 was principally due to interest charges in connection with the Company’s subordinated unsecured renewable notes program launched during the first quarter of 2002. The weighted average interest rate on the balance of the subordinated unsecured renewable notes outstanding as of December 31, 2003 was 8.5%. Subordinated unsecured renewable notes have varying maturities ranging from three months to 10 years. The balance of subordinated unsecured renewable notes outstanding was $39.1 million as of December 31, 2003 and $14.5 million as of December 31, 2002. Charges related to the guidelines of FAS 133 were $0.2 million in 2003, compared to $0.7 million for the same period

24

Table of Contents

      Finance revenue earned on Contracts held for sale and investment decreased to $16.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, versus $16.7 million and $17.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Finance revenue earned on Contracts held for sale and investment is net of participation amortization and is dependent upon the average balance of Contracts held for sale and investment and the corresponding weighted average buy rate. The weighted average buy rates for Contracts held for sale and investment during the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 were 11.01%, 10.76% and 10.59%, respectively. The table below depicts the major components of net interest income.

(1)	Beginning April 1, 2001, the Company has classified interest expense from its Residual Lines of credit under net interest income as a means to match income generated from RISA.

      Servicing Fee Income. Contractual servicing fee income is earned at a rate of 1.0% per annum on the outstanding principal balance of Contracts securitized. Servicing fee income is related to the size of the serviced portfolio and also includes investment interest, late fees, extension fees, document fees and other fees charged to customer accounts.

      Servicing fee income was $53.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, compared to $52.0 million and $57.3 million for the same periods in 2002 and 2001, respectively. The increase in service fee income for 2003 was principally due to an increase in document fees earned on Contracts purchased during the year. The reduction in service fee income for 2002 was principally due to a reduction in investment income received on trust cash accounts during the current periods reported. Additionally, included in the first three months of 2001 was approximately $1.1 million of excess service fee income recorded prior to the adoption of EITF 99-20.

      Gain on Sale of Contracts. When the Company securitizes Contracts, it allocates the acquisition cost of the Contracts between the security sold and the retained interest, based on their relative fair values. The reported gain is the difference between the cash proceeds from the sale of Contracts and its allocated cost. The residual interest in the securitized assets (“RISA”) represents the present value of future cash flows to be generated by the Contracts in excess of the interest paid on the securities issued in the securitization and other costs of servicing the Contracts and completing the securitization. The present value of the estimated future

25

Table of Contents

      The following table illustrates the net interest rate spread for each of the Company’s securitizations through December 31, 2003: