UNITED STATES
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
|
||
þ
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 | ||
or | ||
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the transition period from to . |
Commission file number 33-13646
Westcorp
California
|
51-0308535 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
23 Pasteur, Irvine, California | 92618-3816 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code (949) 727-1002
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |
Common Stock, $1 par value
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the last 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.) Yes þ No o
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2003:
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value $331,502,920
The number of shares outstanding of the issuers class of common stock as of February 27, 2004:
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value 51,759,286
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held April 26, 2004 are incorporated by reference into Part III.
WESTCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-K includes and incorporates by reference forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended. Forward-looking statements relate to analyses and other information that are based on forecasts of future results and estimates of amounts not yet determinable. These statements also relate to our future prospects, developments and business strategies. These statements are subject to uncertainties and factors relating to our operations and business environment, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by these forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as anticipate, believe, could, estimate, expect, intend, may, plan, predict, project, will, and similar terms and phrases, including references to assumptions. These statements are contained in sections entitled Business, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and other sections of this Form 10-K and in the documents incorporated by reference.
The following factors are among those that may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements:
| changes in general economic and business conditions; | |
| interest rate fluctuations, including hedging activities; | |
| our financial condition and liquidity, as well as future cash flows and earnings; | |
| competition; | |
| our level of operating expenses; | |
| the effect, interpretation or application of new or existing laws, regulations and court decisions; | |
| the availability of sources of funding; | |
| the level of chargeoffs on the automobile contracts that we originate; and | |
| significant litigation. |
If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from those expected, estimated or projected.
We do not undertake to update our forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances.
INDUSTRY DATA
In this Form 10-K, we rely on and refer to information regarding the automobile lending industry from market research reports, analyst reports and other publicly available information. Although we believe that this information is reliable, we cannot guarantee the accuracy and completeness of this information, and we have not independently verified any of it.
Available Information
We provide access to all of our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission on our Web site at http://www.westcorpinc.com free of charge on the same day that these reports are electronically filed with the Commission. The information contained in our Web site does not constitute part of this filing.
1
PART I
Item 1. Business
General
We are a financial services holding company that provides automobile lending services through our second-tier subsidiary, WFS Financial Inc, also known as WFS, and retail and commercial banking services through our wholly owned subsidiary, Western Financial Bank, which we refer to as the Bank. The Bank currently owns 84% of the capital stock of WFS. We primarily earn income by originating assets, including automobile contracts, that generate a yield in excess of the cost of the liabilities, including deposits, that fund these assets.
We have grown substantially over the past three years. As of December 31, 2003, we had $14.6 billion in total assets, $10.6 billion in automobile contracts and $1.3 billion in total equity excluding other accumulated comprehensive loss and including minority interest, representing a three-year compounded annual growth rate of 22.9%, 15.8% and 33.2%, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2003, we originated $6.0 billion of automobile contracts and generated $124 million of net income and earnings per diluted share of $2.85.
Automobile Lending Operations
We are one of the nations largest independent automobile finance companies with 31 years of experience in the automobile finance industry. We believe that the automobile finance industry is the second largest consumer finance industry in the United States with over $684 billion of loan originations during 2003. We originate new and pre-owned automobile installment contracts, otherwise known as contracts, through our relationships with approximately 8,000 franchised and independent automobile dealers nationwide. We originated $6.0 billion of contracts during 2003 and owned a portfolio of $10.6 billion contracts at December 31, 2003.
For the year ended December 31, 2003, approximately 32% of our contract originations were for the purchase of new automobiles and approximately 68% of our contract originations were for the purchase of pre-owned automobiles. Approximately 83% of our contract originations were what we refer to as prime contracts, and approximately 17% of our contract originations were what we refer to as non-prime contracts. Our determination of whether a contract is categorized as prime, non-prime or other is based on a number of factors including the borrowers credit history and our expectation of credit loss. All references made throughout this document regarding prime, non-prime or subprime automobile contracts are based on our determination.
We underwrite contracts through a credit approval process that is supported and controlled by a centralized, automated front-end system. This system incorporates proprietary credit scoring models and industry credit scoring models and tools, which enhance our credit analysts ability to tailor each contracts pricing and structure to maximize risk-adjusted returns. We believe that as a result of our sophisticated credit and underwriting systems, we are able to earn attractive risk-adjusted returns on our contracts. For the year ended December 31, 2003, the average net interest spread on our automobile contract originations was 7.63% and the net interest spread on our managed automobile portfolio was 7.10% while net credit losses averaged 2.60% for the same period.
We structure our business to minimize operating costs while providing high quality service to our dealers. Those aspects of our business that require a local market presence are performed on a decentralized basis in our 39 offices. All other operations are centralized. We fund our purchases of contracts, on an interim basis, with deposits raised through our banking operations, which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, also known as the FDIC, and other borrowings. For long-term financing, we issue automobile contract asset-backed securities. Since 1985, we have sold or securitized over $36.0 billion of contracts in 62 public offerings of asset-backed securities, making us the fourth largest issuer of such securities in the nation. We have employed a range of securitization structures and our most recent $1.5 billion issuance of asset-backed securities was structured as a senior/ subordinated transaction with a weighted average interest rate of 2.36%.
2
The following table presents a summary of our contracts purchased:
For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||
New vehicles
|
$ | 1,928,268 | $ | 1,548,372 | $ | 1,208,753 | |||||||
Pre-owned vehicles
|
4,050,308 | 3,867,362 | 3,654,526 | ||||||||||
Total volume
|
$ | 5,978,576 | $ | 5,415,734 | $ | 4,863,279 | |||||||
Prime contracts
|
$ | 4,942,654 | $ | 4,346,212 | $ | 3,675,351 | |||||||
Non-prime contracts
|
1,035,922 | 1,069,522 | 1,187,928 | ||||||||||
Total volume
|
$ | 5,978,576 | $ | 5,415,734 | $ | 4,863,279 | |||||||
Bank Operations
The primary focus of our banking operations is to generate diverse, low-cost funds to provide the liquidity needed to fund our acquisition of contracts. The Bank has the ability to raise significant amounts of liquidity by attracting both short-term and long-term deposits from the general public, commercial enterprises and institutions by offering a variety of accounts and rates. These funds are generated through the Banks retail and commercial banking divisions. The Bank also may raise funds by obtaining advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank, or FHLB, selling securities under agreements to repurchase and utilizing other borrowings. The Banks retail banking division serves the needs of individuals and small businesses by offering a broad range of products through 20 retail branches located throughout Southern California. The Banks commercial banking division focuses on medium-sized businesses in Southern California. At December 31, 2003, the total deposits gathered by both the retail and commercial banking divisions were $2.0 billion. Approximately 89% of these accounts were demand deposits, money market accounts and certificate of deposit accounts under $100,000 in principal, which we believe represents a stable and attractive source of funding.
The Bank also invests deposits generated by its retail and commercial banking divisions in mortgage-backed securities, also known as MBS. Our investment in MBS, together with the cash balances that we maintain, create a significant liquidity portfolio that provides us with additional funding security. Net interest income from Bank operations totaled $32.2 million, $57.0 million and $45.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Net interest income from Bank operations represented 5%, 9% and 10% of our total net interest income on a consolidated basis for the same respective periods.
3
The following table sets forth our loan origination, purchase and sale activity over the past five years:
For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans originated:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Contracts(1)
|
$ | 5,978,576 | $ | 5,415,734 | $ | 4,863,279 | $ | 4,219,227 | $ | 3,340,146 | |||||||||||||
Other
|
4,916 | 3,562 | 6,691 | 12,888 | 15,586 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total consumer loans
|
5,983,492 | 5,419,296 | 4,869,970 | 4,232,115 | 3,355,732 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Existing property
|
7,675 | 21,100 | 9,714 | 17,382 | 263,019 | ||||||||||||||||||
Construction
|
17,534 | 2,022 | 12,318 | 14,718 | 11,969 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity
|
413 | 828 | 969 | 1,024 | 1,948 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total mortgage loans
|
25,622 | 23,950 | 23,001 | 33,124 | 276,936 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans
|
407,387 | 354,439 | 291,944 | 266,342 | 237,316 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total loans originated
|
6,416,501 | 5,797,685 | 5,184,915 | 4,531,581 | 3,869,984 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans purchased:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans on existing property
|
46 | 229 | 488 | 412 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total loans purchased
|
46 | 229 | 488 | 412 | |||||||||||||||||||
Loans sold:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Contracts
|
660,000 | 2,500,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans
|
554 | 3,382 | 3,394 | 502,157 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total loans sold
|
554 | 3,382 | 663,394 | 3,002,157 | |||||||||||||||||||
Principal reductions(2)
|
4,721,919 | 3,922,542 | 2,572,665 | 1,126,520 | 679,224 | ||||||||||||||||||
Increase in total loans
|
$ | 1,694,582 | $ | 1,874,635 | $ | 2,609,097 | $ | 2,742,155 | $ | 189,015 | |||||||||||||
(1) | Includes contracts purchased from automobile dealers as well as leases. |
(2) | Includes scheduled payments, prepayments and chargeoffs. |
The History of Westcorp
Western Thrift & Loan Association, a California-licensed thrift and loan association, was founded in 1972. In 1973, Western Thrift Financial Corporation was formed as the holding company for Western Thrift & Loan Association. It later changed its name to Westcorp. In 1982, Westcorp acquired Evergreen Savings and Loan Association, a California-licensed savings and loan association, which became its wholly owned subsidiary. The activities of Western Thrift & Loan Association were merged into Evergreen Savings and Loan Association in 1982. Evergreen Savings and Loan Associations name was changed ultimately to Western Financial Bank and the Bank ultimately became chartered as a federal savings institution.
Western Thrift & Loan Association was involved in automobile finance activities from its incorporation until its merger with Evergreen Savings and Loan Association. Since such time, the Bank continued the automobile finance activities of Western Thrift & Loan Association. In 1988, Westcorp Financial Services, Inc. was incorporated as a wholly owned consumer finance subsidiary of the Bank to provide non-prime automobile finance services, a market not serviced by the Banks automobile finance division.
In 1995, the Bank transferred its automobile finance division to Westcorp Financial Services, Inc., which changed its name to WFS Financial Inc. In connection with that restructuring, the Bank transferred to WFS
4
Market and Competition
The automobile finance industry is generally segmented according to the type of vehicle sold (new versus pre-owned) and the credit characteristics of the borrower (prime, non-prime or subprime). Based upon industry data, we believe that during 2003, prime, non-prime and subprime loan originations in the United States were $470 billion, $135 billion and $79 billion, respectively. The United States captive automobile finance companies, General Motors Acceptance Corporation, Ford Motor Credit Company and Chrysler Credit Corporation, account for approximately 32% of the automobile finance market. We believe that the balance of the market is highly fragmented and that no other market participant has greater than a 5% market share. Other market participants include the captive automobile finance companies of other manufacturers, banks, credit unions, independent automobile finance companies and other financial institutions.
Our dealer servicing and underwriting capabilities and systems enable us to compete effectively in the automobile finance market. Our ability to compete successfully depends largely upon our strong personal relationships with dealers and their willingness to offer us contracts that meet our underwriting criteria. These relationships are fostered by the promptness with which we process and fund contracts, as well as the flexibility and scope of the programs we offer. We purchase the full spectrum of prime and non-prime contracts secured by both new and pre-owned vehicles.
The competition for contracts available within the prime and non-prime credit quality contract spectrum is more intense when the rate of automobile sales declines. Although we have experienced consistent growth for many years, we can give no assurance that we will continue to do so. Several of our competitors have greater financial resources than we have and may have a lower cost of funds. Many of our competitors also have longstanding relationships with automobile dealers and may offer dealers or their customers other forms of financing or services not provided by us. The finance company that provides floor planning for the dealers inventory is ordinarily one of the dealers primary sources of financing for automobile sales. We do not currently provide financing on dealers inventories. We must also compete with dealer interest rate subsidy programs offered by the captive automobile finance companies. However, these programs are not generally offered on pre-owned vehicles and are limited to certain models or loan terms that may not be attractive to many first time automobile purchasers.
Competition in the retail banking business comes primarily from commercial banks, credit unions, savings and loan associations, mutual funds and corporate and government securities markets. Many of the nations largest savings and loan associations and other depository institutions have locations in Southern California. We compete for deposits primarily on the basis of interest rates paid and the quality of service provided to our customers. We do not rely on any individual, group or entity for a material portion of our deposits.
Competition in the commercial banking business comes primarily from other commercial banks that maintain a presence in Southern California. We have differentiated ourselves by providing high quality service, local relationship management, prompt credit decisions and competitive rates on both loans and depository products.
5
Our Business Strategy
Our business objective is to maximize long-term profitability by efficiently purchasing and servicing prime and non-prime contracts that generate strong and consistent risk-adjusted returns. We achieve this objective by employing our business strategy, which includes the following key elements:
| produce consistent growth through our strong dealer relationships; | |
| price contracts to maximize risk-adjusted returns by using advanced technology and experienced underwriters; | |
| create operating efficiencies through technology and best practices; | |
| generate low cost liquidity through our funding sources, including positive operating cash flows; and | |
| record high quality earnings and maintain a conservative, well-capitalized balance sheet. |
Produce Consistent Growth Through Our Strong Dealer Relationships
Over the past five years, we have experienced a compounded annual growth rate in contract purchases of 17%. We believe we provide a high degree of personalized service to our dealer base by marketing, underwriting and purchasing contracts on a local level. Our focus is to provide each dealer superior service by providing a single source of contact to meet the dealers prime and non-prime financing needs. We believe that the level of our service surpasses that of our competitors by making our business development representatives available any time a dealer is open, making prompt credit decisions, negotiating credit decisions within available programs by providing structural alternatives and funding promptly.
At or For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total automobile contract portfolio managed
|
$ | 10,596,665 | $ | 9,389,974 | $ | 8,152,882 | $ | 6,818,182 | $ | 5,354,385 | ||||||||||
Percentage growth
|
12.9 | % | 15.2 | % | 19.6 | % | 27.3 | % | 22.6 | % | ||||||||||
Total automobile contract originations
|
$ | 5,978,576 | $ | 5,415,734 | $ | 4,863,279 | $ | 4,219,227 | $ | 3,340,146 | ||||||||||
Percentage growth
|
10.4 | % | 11.4 | % | 15.3 | % | 26.3 | % | 25.1 | % |
Growth of originations is primarily through increased dealer penetration. We intend to increase contract purchases from our current dealer base as well as develop new dealer relationships. Prior to 1995, we originated contracts in seven, primarily western, states. Subsequently, we increased our geographic penetration nationwide. Although our presence is well-established throughout the country, we believe that we still have opportunities to build market share, especially in those states that we entered since 1994. In addition, we have improved our dealer education and delivery systems in order to increase the ratio of contracts purchased to the number of applications received from a dealer, thereby improving the efficiency of our dealer relationships. We are also seeking to increase contract purchases through new dealer programs targeting high volume, multiple location dealers. These programs focus on creating relationships with dealers to achieve higher contract originations and improving efficiencies. On a limited basis, we also originate loans directly from consumers and purchase loans from other automobile finance companies. Additionally, we continue to explore other distribution channels, including the Internet. In December 2001, we acquired an interest in DealerTrack Holdings, Inc., also known as DealerTrack, an Internet business-to-business portal that brings together finance companies and dealers. DealerTrack has signed up 40 finance companies and 23,800 dealers. As of December 31, 2003, we owned approximately 6.4% of DealerTrack. Currently, approximately 70% of our applications are processed through DealerTrack.
We are the largest originator of pre-owned automobile contracts in California by a two to one margin to our nearest competitor. Our leading market share in California provides us with economies of scale, thereby enabling us to earn a higher risk adjusted margin in this market. We are seeking to expand our market share in other states to achieve similar economies of scale.
6
Price Contracts to Maximize Risk-Adjusted Returns by Using Advanced Technology and Experienced Underwriters |
Quality underwriting and servicing are essential to effectively assess and price for risk and to maximize risk-adjusted returns. We rely on a combination of credit scoring models, system-controlled underwriting policies and the judgment of our trained credit analysts to make risk-based credit and pricing decisions. We use credit scoring to differentiate applicants and to rank order credit risk in terms of expected default probability. Based upon this statistical assessment of credit risk, the underwriter is able to appropriately tailor contract pricing and structure.
To achieve the return anticipated at origination, we have developed a disciplined behavioral servicing process for the early identification and cure of delinquent contracts and for loss mitigation. In addition, we provide incentives to our associates based on credit performance and profitability measurements on both an individual and company level.
The following table shows the risk-adjusted margins on automobile contracts originated over the past five years:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted average coupon(1)
|
10.03 | % | 11.35 | % | 12.74 | % | 13.95 | % | 13.57 | % | ||||||||||
Interest on borrowings(1)
|
2.70 | 3.74 | 5.37 | 6.74 | 6.08 | |||||||||||||||
Net interest margins
|
7.33 | 7.61 | 7.37 | 7.21 | 7.49 | |||||||||||||||
Credit losses(2)
|
2.60 | 2.77 | 2.27 | 1.91 | 2.13 | |||||||||||||||
Risk-adjusted margins
|
4.73 | % | 4.84 | % | 5.10 | % | 5.30 | % | 5.36 | % | ||||||||||
(1) | Represents the rate on contracts originated during the periods indicated. |
(2) | Represents the rate on managed contracts during the periods indicated. |
Create Operating Efficiencies Through Technology and Best Practices
We evaluate all aspects of our operations in order to streamline processes and employ best practices throughout the organization. Our key technology systems implemented through this process include:
| automated front-end loan origination system that calculates borrower ratios, maintains lending parameters and approval limits, accepts electronic applications and directs applications to the appropriate credit analyst, all of which have reduced the cost of receiving, underwriting and funding contracts; | |
| custom designed proprietary scoring models that rank order the risk of loss occurring on a particular contract; | |
| behavioral delinquency management system, which improves our ability to queue accounts according to the level of risk, monitor collector performance and track delinquent automobile accounts; | |
| centralized and upgraded borrower services department, which includes remittance processing, interactive voice response technology and direct debit services; | |
| centralized imaging system that provides for the electronic retention and retrieval of account records; and | |
| data warehouse that provides analytical tools necessary to evaluate performance of our portfolio by multiple dimensions. |
As a result of these efforts, we have reduced our operating costs as a percent of managed contracts to 2.4% for 2003 from a high of 4.5% during the first quarter of 1999. We will continue to evaluate new technology and best practices to further improve our operating efficiencies.
7
Generate Low Cost Liquidity Through Our Funding Sources, Including Positive Operating Cash Flows
Cash flows from our automobile operations provide a significant source of liquidity for us. In addition, we are able to raise additional liquidity through the asset-backed securities market. Over the last year we held an average of approximately $572 million of unencumbered automobile contracts on our balance sheet, which provides another source of liquidity. The Bank provides liquidity through its retail and commercial banking divisions in the form of deposits. At December 31, 2003, the Bank also had a $2.7 billion mortgage-backed securities portfolio that it can use to obtain advances from the FHLB and securities repurchase agreements. These sources of funds provide us with additional funding security.
Record High Quality Earnings and Maintain a Conservative, Well-Capitalized Balance Sheet
Presenting high quality earnings and maintaining a conservative, well capitalized balance sheet have been our focus since our founding in 1972. We believe this strategy ensures success over the long term, rather than providing extraordinary short-term results. Components of this strategy include accounting for our automobile securitizations as secured financings rather than sales, maintaining appropriate allowances for credit losses and holding a strong equity position.
Since March 2000, we have structured our automobile contract securitizations as secured financings. By accounting for these securitizations as secured financings, the contracts and asset-backed notes issued remain on our balance sheet with the earnings of the contracts in the trust and the related financing costs reflected over the life of the underlying pool of contracts as net interest income on our Consolidated Statements of Income. Additionally, no retained interest in securitized assets, also known as RISA, is recorded on the balance sheet with a corresponding non-cash gain on sale. The RISA must be written off over the life of a securitization. This asset is subject to impairment if assumptions made about the performance of a securitization are not realized. At December 31, 2002, the RISA created from asset-backed securities issued prior to April 2000 had been fully amortized. This compares with a high of $181 million or 30% of equity, net of tax, in 1997.
Our allowance for credit losses was $302 million at December 31, 2003, compared with $269 million at December 31, 2002. The increase in the allowance for credit losses was the result of a higher level of automobile contracts held on balance sheet. The allowance for credit losses as a percentage of owned loans outstanding was 2.7% at December 31, 2003, compared with 2.9% at December 31, 2002. Based on the analysis we performed related to the allowance for credit losses as described under Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Critical Accounting Policies, we believe that our allowance for credit losses is currently adequate to cover probable losses in our loan portfolio that can be reasonably estimated.
Total shareholders equity, excluding accumulated other comprehensive loss and including minority interest, was $1.3 billion or 9.0% of total assets at December 31, 2003. This compares with total shareholders equity of $816 million or 6.5% of total assets at December 31, 2002.
Operations
Automobile Lending
Locations
We currently originate contracts nationwide through our 39 offices. Each regional business center manager is accountable for the performance of contracts originated in that office throughout the life of the contracts, including acquisition, underwriting, funding and collection. We have two national service centers located in California and Texas with functions including data verification, records management, remittance processing, customer service call centers, automated dialers and asset recovery. We also maintain three regional bankruptcy and remarketing centers. Our corporate offices are located in Irvine, California.
8
Business Development
Our business development representatives are responsible for improving our relationship with existing dealers and enrolling and educating new dealers to increase the number of contracts originated. Business development managers within each regional business center provide direct management oversight to each business development representative. In addition, the director of sales and marketing provides oversight management to ensure that all business development managers and representatives are following overall corporate guidelines.
Business development representatives target selected dealers within their territory based upon volume, potential for business, financing needs of the dealers, and competitors that are doing business with such dealers. Before we decide to do business with a new dealer, we perform a review process of the dealer and its business. If we then determine to proceed, we enter into a non-exclusive dealership agreement with the dealer. This agreement contains certain representations regarding the contracts the dealer will sell to us. Due to the non-exclusive nature of our relationship with dealers, the dealers retain discretion to determine whether to sell contracts to us or another financial institution. The business development representative is responsible for educating the dealers finance managers about the types of contracts that meet our underwriting standards. We believe this education process helps to minimize the number of applications we receive that are outside of our underwriting guidelines, thereby increasing our efficiency and lowering our overall cost to originate contracts.
After the dealer relationship is established, the business development representative continues to actively monitor the relationship with the objective of maximizing the overall profitability of each dealer relationship within his or her territory. This includes monitoring the number of approved applications received from each dealer that are converted into contracts, verifying that the contracts meet our underwriting standards, monitoring the risk-based pricing of contracts acquired and reviewing the actual performance of the contracts purchased. To the extent that a dealer does not meet minimum conversion ratios, lending volume standards or overall profitability targets, the dealer may be precluded from sending us applications in the future. During the year our dealer base increased from approximately 7,800 to 8,000, primarily as a result of us expanding our nationwide presence. Our increase in volume is the result of this increase in our dealer base, in addition to funding more contracts from our existing dealers.
Underwriting and Purchasing of Contracts
The underwriting process begins when an application is sent to us via the Internet or faxed to our data entry service provider. During 2002, we outsourced our data entry process to a third-party provider to maximize efficiencies and reduce our costs due to the decreased volume of applications received via fax. Internet applications are automatically loaded into our front-end underwriting computer system. Our data entry service providers enter the applicant information from faxed applications into our front-end system. Once an application is in the front-end system, the system automatically obtains the applicants credit bureau information and calculates our proprietary credit score.
We use credit scoring to differentiate credit applicants and to rank order credit risk in terms of expected default probabilities. This enables us to tailor contract pricing and structure according to our statistical assessment of credit risk. For example, a consumer with a lower score would indicate a higher probability of default; therefore, we would structure and price the transaction to compensate for this higher default risk. Multiple scorecards are used to accommodate the full spectrum of contracts we purchase. In addition to a credit score, the system highlights certain aspects of the credit application that have historically impacted the credit worthiness of the borrower.
Our credit analysts are responsible for properly structuring and pricing deals to meet our risk-based criteria. They review the applicants information and the structure and price of an application and determine whether to approve, decline or make a counteroffer to the dealer. Each credit analysts lending levels and approval authorities are established based on the individual analysts credit experience and portfolio performance, credit manager audit results and quality control review results. Higher levels of approvals are required for higher credit risk and are controlled by system driven parameters and limits. System driven
9
Once a credit decision has been made, the computer system automatically sends a response to the dealer through the Internet or via fax specifying approval, denial or conditional approval. Conditional approval is based upon modification to the structure, such as an increase in the down payment, reduction of the term, or the addition of a co-signer. As part of the approval process, the credit analyst may require that some of the information be verified, such as the applicants income, employment, residence or credit history. The system increases efficiency by automatically denying approval in certain circumstances without additional underwriting being performed. These automated notices are controlled by parameters, set by us, consistent with our credit policy.
If the dealer accepts the terms of the approval, the dealer is required to deliver the necessary documentation for each contract to us. Our funding group audits such documents for completeness and consistency with the application and provides final approval and funding of the contract. A direct deposit is made or a check is prepared and promptly sent to the dealer for payment. The dealers proceeds may include dealer participation for consideration of the acquisition of the contract. The completed contract file is then forwarded to our records center for imaging.
Under the direction of the Credit and Pricing Committee, the Chief Credit Officer oversees credit risk management, sets underwriting policy, monitors contract pricing, tracks compliance to underwriting policies and re-underwrites select contracts. If re-underwriting statistics are unacceptable, a portion of quarterly incentives are forfeited by the office that originated the contracts. Our internal quality control group reviews contracts on a statistical sampling basis to ensure adherence to established lending guidelines and proper documentation requirements. Credit managers within each regional business center provide direct management oversight to each credit analyst. In addition, the Chief Credit Officer provides oversight management to ensure that all credit managers and analysts are following overall corporate guidelines.
10
The following table sets forth information for contracts originated, contracts managed and number of dealers in the states in which we operate our business:
Contracts Originated | |||||||||||||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, | At December 31, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||
State | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | Managed Portfolio | Number of Dealers(1) | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
California
|
$ | 2,228,877 | $ | 2,091,347 | $ | 1,928,371 | $ | 3,992,899 | 3,025 | ||||||||||||
Washington
|
373,111 | 310,189 | 216,003 | 570,259 | 543 | ||||||||||||||||
Arizona
|
299,918 | 283,528 | 324,299 | 567,224 | 468 | ||||||||||||||||
Colorado
|
248,667 | 200,153 | 123,788 | 376,790 | 332 | ||||||||||||||||
Oregon
|
206,875 | 214,683 | 196,292 | 356,905 | 501 | ||||||||||||||||
Texas
|
204,065 | 171,761 | 181,651 | 371,503 | 823 | ||||||||||||||||
Virginia
|
162,148 | 123,403 | 99,056 | 273,485 | 445 | ||||||||||||||||
Ohio
|
161,846 | 171,109 | 174,040 | 351,102 | 788 | ||||||||||||||||
North Carolina
|
148,786 | 144,859 | 138,956 | 288,587 | 505 | ||||||||||||||||
Illinois
|
147,635 | 104,576 | 93,709 | 233,714 | 534 | ||||||||||||||||
Nevada
|
142,957 | 131,094 | 105,747 | 252,167 | 166 | ||||||||||||||||
Florida
|
132,238 | 147,931 | 184,289 | 300,689 | 698 | ||||||||||||||||
Idaho
|
129,838 | 102,475 | 77,184 | 199,956 | 198 | ||||||||||||||||
New York
|
117,377 | 63,519 | 29,801 | 157,774 | 299 | ||||||||||||||||
Michigan
|
109,323 | 82,542 | 67,905 | 178,164 | 369 | ||||||||||||||||
Maryland
|
100,620 | 62,145 | 41,286 | 149,878 | 246 | ||||||||||||||||
Georgia
|
98,224 | 77,294 | 82,352 | 181,685 | 431 | ||||||||||||||||
Tennessee
|
90,156 | 86,228 | 83,892 | 176,717 | 310 | ||||||||||||||||
South Carolina
|
88,511 | 145,892 | 129,963 | 231,142 | 283 | ||||||||||||||||
Missouri
|
77,273 | 70,070 | 57,883 | 139,082 | 350 | ||||||||||||||||
Utah
|
74,993 | 84,897 | 77,321 | 138,880 | 284 | ||||||||||||||||
Massachusetts
|
69,343 | 39,086 | 27,778 | 96,091 | 185 | ||||||||||||||||
New Jersey
|
60,255 | 42,210 | 28,280 | 96,137 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||
Wisconsin
|
52,304 | 44,318 | 40,826 | 87,105 | 221 | ||||||||||||||||
Pennsylvania
|
47,813 | 50,699 | 46,122 | 95,851 | 376 | ||||||||||||||||
Indiana
|
46,530 | 37,904 | 36,739 | 83,556 | 231 | ||||||||||||||||
Minnesota
|
46,398 | 29,708 | 18,240 | 63,698 | 115 | ||||||||||||||||
Alabama
|
43,343 | 36,570 | 31,967 | 82,560 | 213 | ||||||||||||||||
Connecticut
|
35,183 | 22,928 | 11,508 | 53,316 | 98 | ||||||||||||||||
New Mexico
|
34,010 | 23,930 | 24,146 | 52,238 | 110 | ||||||||||||||||
Delaware
|
32,750 | 26,697 | 26,173 | 61,660 | 64 | ||||||||||||||||
New Hampshire
|
32,619 | 24,275 | 10,563 | 46,790 | 89 | ||||||||||||||||
Kansas
|
26,398 | 19,448 | 21,533 | 45,050 | 126 | ||||||||||||||||
Kentucky
|
23,112 | 41,754 | 41,526 | 66,130 | 193 | ||||||||||||||||
Iowa
|
20,712 | 20,552 | 9,228 | 34,533 | 94 | ||||||||||||||||
Oklahoma
|
12,874 | 27,390 | 25,065 | 35,949 | 85 | ||||||||||||||||
Mississippi
|
10,245 | 18,051 | 19,691 | 33,315 | 91 | ||||||||||||||||
Nebraska
|
8,165 | 9,824 | 5,248 | 15,055 | 52 | ||||||||||||||||
Wyoming
|
8,105 | 12,507 | 6,918 | 15,985 | 36 | ||||||||||||||||
West Virginia
|
7,111 | 9,447 | 11,930 | 19,435 | 84 | ||||||||||||||||
Rhode Island
|
5,170 | 4,385 | 2,947 | 8,584 | 29 | ||||||||||||||||
South Dakota
|
4,971 | 3,843 | 2,078 | 6,831 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||
Maine
|
3,782 | 492 | 985 | 4,227 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||
Montana
|
3,590 | 3,303 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Vermont
|
355 | 21 | 349 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||
Hawaii
|
315 | 26 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 5,978,576 | $ | 5,415,734 | $ | 4,863,279 | $ | 10,596,665 | 14,355 | ||||||||||||
(1) | Represents number of dealers from which contracts were originated that remain outstanding in our servicing portfolio at December 31, 2003. |
11
Servicing of Contracts
We service all of the contracts we purchase, both those held by us and those sold in automobile securitizations. The servicing process includes collecting and processing payments, responding to borrower inquiries, maintaining the security interest in the vehicle, maintaining physical damage insurance coverage and repossessing and selling collateral when necessary. During the second quarter of 2000, we implemented a new decision support system that incorporates behavioral scoring models. Additionally, in the second quarter of 2001, we began purchasing credit bureau information on all borrowers, which is updated each quarter. We believe these processes are the most efficient and effective collection methods.
We use monthly billing statements to serve as a reminder to borrowers as well as an early warning mechanism in the event a borrower has failed to notify us of an address change. Payments received in the mail or through our offices are processed by our centralized remittance processing center. To expedite the collection process, we accept payments from borrowers through automated payment programs including Internet banking, direct debits and third party payment processing services. Our customer service center uses interactive voice response technology to answer routine account questions and route calls to the appropriate service counselor.
Our fully integrated servicing, decision and collections system automatically forwards accounts to our automated dialer or regional collection centers based on the assessed risk of default or loss. Account assessment poses several courses of action, including delaying collection activity based on the likelihood of self curing, directing an account to the automated dialer for a predetermined number of days before forwarding it to a regional collections office, or directly forwarding to a loan service counselor in the regional office for accelerated collection efforts as early as when the loan is seven days past due. This process balances the efficiency of centralized collection efforts with the effectiveness of decentralized personal collection efforts. Our systems track delinquencies and chargeoffs, monitor the performance of our collection associates and assist in delinquency forecasting. To assist in the collection process, we can access original documents through our imaging system, which stores all the documents related to each contract. We limit deferments to a maximum of three over the life of the contract and rarely rewrite contracts.
If an account is delinquent and satisfactory payment arrangements are not made, the automobile is generally repossessed within 60 to 90 days of the date of delinquency, subject to compliance with applicable law. We use independent contractors to perform repossessions. The automobile remains in our custody for 10 days, or longer if required by applicable law, to provide the obligor the opportunity to redeem the automobile. If after the redemption period the delinquency is not cured, we write down the vehicle to fair value and reclassify the contract as a repossessed asset. After the redemption period expires, we prepare the automobile for sale. We sell substantially all repossessed automobiles through wholesale automobile auctions, subject to applicable law. We do not provide the financing on repossessions sold. We use regional remarketing departments to sell our repossessed vehicles. Once the vehicles are sold, we charge off any remaining deficiency balances. At December 31, 2003, repossessed automobiles outstanding managed by us were $10.3 million or 0.10% of the total managed contract portfolio, compared with $16.4 million or 0.18%, of the total managed contract portfolio at December 31, 2002.
It is our policy to charge off an account when it becomes contractually delinquent by 120 days, except for accounts that are in Chapter 13 bankruptcy, even if we have not yet repossessed the vehicle. At the time that a contract is charged off, all accrued interest is reversed. After chargeoff, we collect deficiency balances through our centralized asset recovery center. These efforts include contacting the borrower directly, seeking a deficiency judgment through a small claims court or instituting other judicial action where necessary. In some cases, particularly where recovery is believed to be less likely, the account may be assigned to a collection agency for final resolution. For those accounts that are in Chapter 13 bankruptcy and contractually past due 120 days, we reverse all accrued interest and recognize income on a cash basis. Additionally, we write down such contracts to fair value.
12
Retail Banking
Our retail banking operations are conducted through 20 branch offices located throughout Southern California. The total deposits gathered by the retail banking division were $1.3 billion at December 31, 2003 compared to $1.4 billion at December 31, 2002. Due to our limited number of branch offices, we have historically focused on certificate of deposit accounts as the primary product offered by the retail banking division. More recently, we have focused on raising low cost demand deposits and money market accounts in order to lower our overall cost of deposits.
Demand deposits and money market accounts obtained through our retail banking operations totaled $608 million at December 31, 2003 compared with $490 million at December 31, 2002. At December 31, 2003, demand deposits and money market accounts represented 48% of our total retail banking deposits compared with 36% at December 31, 2002. In addition, demand deposits, money market accounts and certificate of deposit accounts under $100,000 in principal represented approximately 89% of our total deposit accounts.
Commercial Banking
We focus our commercial banking operations in Southern California, operating through our Irvine headquarters. We target commercial clients with sales between $10 million and $100 million. We offer our commercial clients a full array of deposit and loan products that are priced competitively and designed specifically for them. The commercial banking divisions strategy is to generate deposits in excess of the loans it funds to provide another source of liquidity for us. Deposit products include money market, business checking and certificate of deposit accounts delivered either through direct contact or cash management services. Loan products include term loans, lines of credit, asset-based loans, construction loans and real estate loans. We also offer consumer deposit and money market accounts as well as consumer loans and lines of credit to the company owners, management and their associates. Loan products are generally priced on a floating rate basis, based on the prime rate or the London Interbank Offered Rate, also known as LIBOR. Fixed rate loans are generally limited to a one-year term or less.
Credit quality is managed by having each loan reviewed for approval by the Commercial Bank President, Chairman of the Board, Board members or other executive officers. In addition, account officers are assigned to specific accounts to maintain close contact with the customer. Such contact allows for greater opportunity to cross sell products, as well as to observe and continually evaluate customers for potential credit problems.
At December 31, 2003, the commercial banking division had $638 million in deposits compared with $517 million at December 31, 2002. Commercial loans outstanding totaled $124 million and $97.2 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
The following table presents information regarding total loans and deposits of our commercial banking operations:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Average balance loans
|
$ | 377,848 | $ | 427,035 | $ | 551,922 | ||||||
Average balance deposits
|
734,147 | 487,102 | 404,435 | |||||||||
Interest income
|
19,957 | 28,516 | 42,928 | |||||||||
Interest expense
|
5,478 | 6,615 | 16,072 | |||||||||
Average interest rate earned on loans
|
5.28 | % | 6.68 | % | 7.78 | % | ||||||
Average interest rate paid on deposits(1)
|
0.75 | % | 1.36 | % | 3.97 | % |
(1) | Excludes effect of hedging activities. |
13
Mortgage Portfolios
We have from time to time originated mortgage products that were held on our balance sheet rather than selling such products into the secondary markets. Other than mortgage loans originated on a limited basis through the commercial banking division, we do not expect to add mortgage loans to our balance sheet.
Transactions with Related Parties
We believe that the transactions with affiliates described below are on terms no less favorable to us than could be obtained from unaffiliated parties. These transactions were approved by our Board of Directors and the Boards of Directors of the Bank and WFS, including their respective independent directors. For accounting purposes, each of the transactions described below eliminates upon consolidation.
Intercompany Borrowings
WFS has various borrowing arrangements with the Bank, including long-term, unsecured debt and lines of credit designed to provide financing for WFS and its subsidiaries. These borrowings are the only source of liquidity WFS currently utilizes outside of the asset-backed securities market. These borrowing arrangements, on an unconsolidated basis, provide the Bank with what it believes to be a market rate of return.
WFS borrowed $125 million from the Bank under the terms of a $125 million note executed in 1995. The $125 million note provided for principal payments of $25 million per year, commencing on April 30, 1999 and continuing through its final maturity, April 30, 2003. Interest payments on the $125 million note were due quarterly, in arrears, calculated at the rate of 7.25% per annum. The $125 million note was paid off in the third quarter of 2001. There was no outstanding balance on the $125 million note at December 31, 2003. Interest expense on this note totaled $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2001.
WFS borrowed $150 million from the Bank under the terms of a $150 million note, as amended. This note matures on August 1, 2007, although the Bank has the option to require payment in part or in full at any time prior to that date. Interest payments on the $150 million note are due quarterly in arrears, calculated at the rate of 8.875% per annum. Pursuant to the terms of this note, WFS may not incur any other indebtedness that is senior to the obligations evidenced by this note except for (i) indebtedness under the $125 million note, (ii) indebtedness collateralized or secured under the $1.8 billion line of credit discussed below and (iii) indebtedness for similar types of warehouse lines of credit. WFS made principal payments on this note totaling $7.2 million and $42.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. There was $101 million outstanding on this note at December 31, 2003 compared with $108 million at December 31, 2002. Interest expense on this note totaled $9.1 million, $12.4 million and $10.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Additionally, WFS borrowed $300 million from the Bank under the terms of a $300 million note in May 2002. This note matures on May 15, 2012. Interest payments on the $300 million note are due semi-annually, in arrears, calculated at the rate of 10.25% per annum. Pursuant to the terms of this note, WFS may not incur any other indebtedness that is senior to the obligations evidenced by this note except for (i) indebtedness under the $150 million note, (ii) indebtedness collateralized or secured under the $1.8 billion line of credit and (iii) indebtedness for similar types of warehouse lines of credit. There was $300 million outstanding on this note at December 31, 2003 and 2002. Interest expense on this note totaled $30.8 million and $20.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
WFS has a line of credit extended by the Bank permitting it to draw up to $1.8 billion as needed to be used in its operations. WFS does not pay a commitment fee for this line of credit. The line of credit terminates on December 31, 2004, although WFS may extend the term for additional periods of up to 60 months. There was no amount outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002. The average amount outstanding on the line was $14.7 million for 2003 and $50.5 million for 2002. The $1.8 billion line of credit carries an interest rate based on the one-month LIBOR and an interest spread of 125 basis points when unsecured and 90 basis points when secured. The Bank has the right under this line of credit to refuse to permit additional amounts to be drawn if,
14
Various subsidiaries of WFS have entered into lines of credit with the Bank. These lines permit these subsidiaries to draw up to a total of $330 million to fund activities related to securitizations. Of the total $330 million, $10 million terminates on December 1, 2006 and $320 million terminates on January 1, 2010, although the terms may be extended by these subsidiaries for additional periods of up to 60 months. At December 31, 2003, the amount outstanding on these lines of credit totaled $21.8 million compared with $62.0 million at December 31, 2002. These lines of credit carry an interest rate based on one-month LIBOR and an interest spread of 112.5 basis points when unsecured and 62.5 basis points when secured.
Interest on the amounts outstanding under the lines of credit is paid monthly, in arrears, and is calculated on the daily average amount outstanding that month. Interest expense for these lines of credit totaled $1.0 million, $3.0 million and $8.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, the weighted average interest rates for the lines of credit were 2.28%, 2.74% and 4.43%, respectively. At December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, the weighted average interest rates for the lines of credit were 2.28%, 2.55% and 3.08%, respectively.
Short-Term Investment
WFS invests its excess cash at the Bank under an investment agreement. Prior to January 1, 2002, the Bank paid WFS an interest rate on this excess cash equal to the federal composite commercial paper rate. On January 1, 2002, the agreement was amended to revise the interest rate to one-month LIBOR. The weighted average interest rate was 1.23%, 1.77% and 3.80% for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. WFS held $764 million and $688 million excess cash with the Bank under the investment agreement at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The average investment during 2003 was $660 million compared with $561 million during 2002. Interest income earned by WFS under this agreement totaled $8.2 million, $10.2 million and $4.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The interest rate was 1.17% at December 31, 2003 compared with 1.44% at December 31, 2002.
Reinvestment Contracts
Pursuant to a series of agreements to which WFS, the Bank and WFAL2, among others, are parties, WFS has access to the cash flows of certain outstanding securitizations, including the cash held in the spread accounts for these securitizations. WFS is permitted to use that cash as it determines, including to originate contracts.
In certain securitizations, the Bank and WFAL2 have entered into a reinvestment contract that is deemed to be an eligible investment under the relevant securitization agreements. The securitization agreements require that all cash flows of the relevant trust and the associated spread accounts be invested in the applicable reinvestment contract. A limited portion of the invested funds may be used by WFAL2 and the balance may be used by the Bank. The Bank makes its portion available to WFS pursuant to the terms of the WFS Reinvestment Contract. Under the WFS Reinvestment Contract, WFS receives access to all of the cash available to the Bank under each trust reinvestment contract and is obligated to repay to the Bank an amount equal to the cash so used when needed by the Bank to meet its obligations under the individual trust reinvestment contracts. With the portion of the cash available to it under the individual trust reinvestment contracts, WFAL2 purchases contracts from WFS pursuant to the terms of a sale and servicing agreement.
In accordance with these agreements, the Bank and WFAL2 pledge property owned by each of them for the benefit of the trustee of each trust and the surety. WFS paid the Bank a fee equal to 12.5 basis points of the amount of collateral pledged by the Bank as consideration for the pledge of collateral and for WFS access to cash under the WFS Reinvestment Contract in 2003. Effective January 1, 2004, this fee was increased to 55 basis points. WFS paid the Bank $1.2 million, $1.2 million and $1.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, for this purpose. As WFAL2 directly utilizes the cash made available to it to purchase contracts for its own account from WFS, no additional consideration from WFS is required to support WFAL2s pledge of its property under the agreement with Financial Security Assurance Inc., also
15
Whole Loan Sales
We purchased $1.7 billion and $1.4 billion of contracts from WFS in whole loan sales for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2001, respectively. We purchased no contracts from WFS for the year ended December 31, 2002. In these transactions, WFS received cash for the amount of the principal outstanding on the contracts plus a premium of $49.6 million and $44.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2001, respectively. These premiums were recorded by WFS as a cash gain on sale, net of the write-off of outstanding dealer participation balances and the effect of hedging activities. These contracts were subsequently securitized by us and continue to be managed by WFS under the terms of the transactions. These whole loan sale transactions are eliminated upon consolidation for accounting purposes.
On February 27, 2004, we purchased $1.5 billion of contracts from WFS in a whole loan sale. In this transaction, WFS received cash for the amount of the principal outstanding on the contracts plus a premium of $48.5 million. These contracts were subsequently securitized by us and continue to be managed by WFS under the terms of the securitization.
Tax Sharing Agreement
We and our subsidiaries are parties to an amended tax sharing agreement pursuant to which a consolidated federal tax return is filed for all of the parties to the agreement. Under this agreement, the tax due by the group is allocated to each member based upon the relative percentage of each members taxable income to that of all members. Each member pays us its estimated share of tax liability when otherwise due, but in no event may the amount paid exceed the amount of tax that would have been due if a member were to file a separate return. A similar process is used with respect to state income taxes for those states that permit the filing of a consolidated or combined return. Tax liabilities to states that require the filing of separate tax returns for each company are paid by each company. The term of the amended tax sharing agreement commenced on the first day of the consolidated return year beginning January 1, 2002 and continues in effect until the parties to the tax sharing agreement agree in writing to terminate it. See Consolidated Financial Statements Note 23 Income Taxes.
Management Agreements
We have entered into certain management agreements with WFS and the Bank pursuant to which we pay an allocated portion of certain costs and expenses incurred by WFS and the Bank with respect to services or facilities of WFS and the Bank used by us or our subsidiaries, including our principal office facilities, our field offices, and overhead and associate benefits pertaining to Bank and WFS associates who also provide services to us or our subsidiaries. Additionally, as part of these management agreements, WFS and the Bank have agreed to reimburse us for similar costs incurred. The management agreements may be terminated by any party upon five days prior written notice without cause, or immediately in the event of the other partys breach of any covenant, obligation, or duty contained in the applicable management agreement or for violation of law, ordinance, statute, rule or regulation governing either party to the applicable management agreement.
Supervision and Regulation
General
The following discussion describes federal and state laws and regulations that have a material effect on our business. These laws and regulations generally are intended to protect consumers, depositors, federal
16
Bank Operations
The Bank and its subsidiaries are subject to examination and comprehensive regulation and reporting requirements by the Office of Thrift Supervision, also known as the OTS, the Banks primary federal regulator, as well as by the FDIC. The OTS is required to conduct a full scope, on-site examination of the Bank every twelve months. In addition, the Bank is subject to regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, which governs reserves required to be maintained against deposits and other matters. The Bank also is a member of the FHLB of San Francisco, one of twelve regional banks for federally insured savings and loan associations and banks comprising the FHLB System. The FHLB System is under the supervision of the Federal Housing Finance Board. In addition, various other laws and regulations, such as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Federal Home Loan Bank Act, Community Reinvestment Act, Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and USA Patriot Act, directly or indirectly affect our business.
Since WFS is owned by the Bank, which is a federal savings association, it is subject to regulation and examination primarily by the OTS as well as by the FDIC. Our service corporation subsidiaries also are subject to regulation by the OTS and other applicable federal and state agencies. WFS and certain of our other subsidiaries are further regulated by various departments or commissions of the states in which they do business. This includes our insurance subsidiaries which are subject to regulation by applicable state insurance regulatory agencies.
Automobile Lending Operations
We purchase automobile installment contracts in 45 states and are subject to both state and federal regulation of our automobile lending operations. We must comply with each states consumer finance, automobile finance, licensing and titling laws and regulations to the extent those laws and regulations are not pre-empted by OTS regulations or federal law.
The contracts we originate and service are subject to numerous federal and state consumer protection laws, including the Federal Truth-in-Lending Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Fair Credit Billing Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, the California Rees-Levering Act, other retail installment sales laws and similar state laws. Most state consumer protection laws also govern the process by which we may repossess and sell an automobile pledged as security on a defaulted contract. We must follow those laws carefully in order to maximize the amount of money we can recover on a defaulted contract.
Affiliate Transaction Restrictions
The Home Owners Loan Act, also known as HOLA, limits the type of activities and investments in which the Bank or its subsidiaries may participate if the investment or activity involves an affiliate of the Bank. In addition, transactions between the Bank or its subsidiaries and an affiliate must be on terms that are at least as favorable to the Bank or its subsidiaries as are the terms of the transactions with unaffiliated companies. This permits the OTS to, as necessary, limit transactions between us, the Bank, our subsidiaries or affiliates and the subsidiaries or affiliates of the Bank, and limit any of our activities that might create a serious risk that our liabilities and the liabilities of our affiliates may be imposed on the Bank.
Investment Restrictions
HOLA regulations limit certain activities of the Bank and its operating subsidiaries to a percentage of the Banks total consolidated assets, excluding for these purposes, assets held by its service corporations. The Bank
17
Capital Requirements
As a federally chartered savings bank, the Bank is subject to certain minimum capital requirements imposed by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act, also known as FIRREA, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act, also known as FDICIA. FDICIA separates all financial institutions into one of five capital categories: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized. To be considered well capitalized, an institution must have a ratio of total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets of 10.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio to risk-weighted assets of 6.0% or greater, a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater and not be subject to any OTS order. To be adequately capitalized, an institution must have a total risk-based capital ratio of not less than 8.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of not less than 4.0% and a leverage ratio of not less than 4.0%. Any institution that is neither well-capitalized nor adequately capitalized will be considered undercapitalized. In addition, HOLA and the OTS regulations require savings associations to maintain tangible capital in an amount not less than 1.5% of adjusted total assets and core capital in an amount not less than 3% of adjusted total assets.
HOLA mandates that the OTS promulgate capital regulations that include capital standards no less stringent than the capital standards applicable to national banks. The OTS in its regulations has defined total risk-based capital as core capital plus supplementary capital less direct equity investments not permissible to national banks (subject to a phase-in schedule) and reciprocal holdings that other depository institutions may count in their regulatory capital. Supplementary capital is limited to 100% of core capital. Supplementary capital is comprised of permanent capital instruments not included in core capital, general valuation loan and lease loss allowance, and maturing capital instruments such as subordinated debentures. At December 31, 2003, there were two debenture issuances remaining, one with an outstanding balance excluding discounts and issuance costs of $101 million and an interest rate of 8.875% due in 2007 and a second with an outstanding balance excluding discounts and issuance costs of $300 million and an interest rate of 9.625% due in 2012. Pursuant to the approval from the OTS to treat those debentures as supplementary capital, the total amount of debentures issued by the Bank that may be included as supplementary capital may not exceed the total amount of the Banks core capital. The amount of the 8.875% debentures that may be included as supplementary capital began to decrease at the rate of 20% of the amount originally outstanding per year, net of redemptions, on August 1, 2002. The 9.625% debentures will not begin to be phased out as supplementary capital until May 15, 2007.
The Bank currently meets all capital requirements to which it is subject and satisfies the requirements of a well capitalized institution. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Capital Resources and Liquidity Capital Requirements for an analysis of the Banks actual capital and required capital. Because the Bank is well capitalized, it may accept brokered deposits without restriction. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
18
Distributions
The OTS has adopted regulations for determining if capital distributions of a savings association are permitted. Capital distributions are permissible unless the Bank would be undercapitalized, the proposal raises safety and soundness concerns, or violates a prohibition in any statute, regulation or agreement between the Bank and the OTS. See Note 19 to the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition Dividends for a more detailed description of limits on dividends the Bank is allowed to pay.
The Bank also is subject to certain limitations on the payment of dividends by the terms of the indentures for its debentures. Those limitations are more severe than the OTS capital distribution regulations. Under the most restrictive of those limitations arising in connection with the Banks sale of debentures, the greatest capital distribution that the Bank could currently make is $218 million.
Insurance of Accounts
The FDIC administers the Savings Association Insurance Fund, also known as SAIF. Deposits with the Bank are insured through the SAIF to the maximum amount permitted by law, which is currently $100,000. The FDIC may terminate the deposit insurance of any insured depository institution, including the Bank, if it determines after a hearing that the institution has either engaged or is engaging in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, order or any condition imposed by an agreement with the FDIC.
Subprime Lending Programs
The OTS, along with other federal banking regulatory agencies, has adopted guidance pertaining to subprime lending programs. Pursuant to the guidance, lending programs that provide credit to borrowers whose credit histories reflect specified negative characteristics, such as recent bankruptcies or payment delinquencies, are deemed to be subprime lending programs. Many of the loans that we originate possess one or more of the factors identified in the guidance as indicative of a subprime loan. Pursuant to the guidance, examiners may require that an institution with a subprime lending program hold additional capital that ranges from one and one-half to three times the normal capital required for similar loans made to borrowers who are not subprime borrowers. Because many of the loans we originate possess one or more of the factors identified in the guidance as indicative of a subprime loan, the Bank maintains its capital levels higher than those otherwise required by the OTS. The maintenance of higher capital levels by the Bank may slow our growth, require us to raise additional capital or sell assets, all of which would negatively impact our earnings. We cannot predict whether the Bank will be required by the OTS to hold additional capital with respect to those automobile contracts we hold as to which the borrowers are deemed by the OTS to be subprime borrowers.
Taxation
Federal Income Taxes
We file a calendar year consolidated federal income tax return with our subsidiaries. All entities included in the consolidated financial statements are included in the consolidated tax return.
The Bank is a savings and loan association for federal income tax purposes. Prior to 1996, savings and loan associations satisfying certain conditions were permitted under the Internal Revenue Code to establish reserves for bad debts and to make annual additions to these reserves, which qualified as deductions from income. However, in 1996 new legislation was enacted which eliminated the reserve method of accounting for bad debts for tax purposes for savings and loan associations and required the reserve balance to be recaptured. During 2003, the remaining $1.7 million of reserves were recaptured.
19
We will be subject to the alternative minimum tax if that tax is larger than the regular federal tax otherwise payable. Generally, alternative minimum taxable income is a taxpayers regular taxable income, increased by the taxpayers tax preference items for the year and adjusted by computing certain deductions in a special manner which negates the acceleration of such deductions under the regular federal tax. This amount is then reduced by an exemption amount and is subject to tax at a 20% rate. In the past, we have not generally paid alternative minimum tax and do not expect that we will in the current year.
During 2003, the Internal Revenue Service completed their examination of our returns for the tax years ended December 31, 1997 through 1999. All additional tax and interest related to the examination have been paid, which amount was not material to our Consolidated Statements of Income. There were no penalties assessed as a result of this examination.
California Franchise Tax and Other State Provisions
At the end of 2003, we had a tax presence in approximately 38 states. However, we expect that approximately 50% of the activity of the group and the resulting income will be taxed as California source income, with the remaining amounts apportioned or allocated outside California.
The California franchise tax applicable to the Bank is higher than the rate of tax applicable to non-financial corporations because it includes an amount in lieu of local personal property and business license taxes paid by non-financial corporations, but not generally paid by financial institutions such as the Bank. For taxable years ending on or after December 31, 1995, the tax rate for a financial corporation is equal to the tax rate on a regular corporation plus 2%. For income years beginning after January 1, 1997, the California regular corporate tax rate is 8.84% and the financial corporation tax rate is 10.84%.
We compute our taxable income for California purposes on a unitary basis, or as if we were one business unit, and file one combined California franchise tax return, excluding Westhrift Life Insurance Company, also known as Westhrift. We are under examination by the California Franchise Tax Board and various other state taxing authorities for tax years 1998 through 2001. We do not anticipate any significant changes based upon these examinations.
Subsidiaries
The following subsidiaries are included in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
WFS Receivables Corporation 2
WFS Receivables Corporation 2, also known as WFSRC2, is a wholly owned, Nevada based, limited purpose corporation. WFSRC2 was organized for the purpose of purchasing contracts from WFS and securitizing them in the asset-backed securities market. Securitizations originated by WFSRC2 are guaranteed under a financial guaranty insurance policy issued by FSA. Securitization transactions in which contracts are sold through WFSRC2 are treated as secured financings for accounting purposes. At December 31, 2003, WFSRC2 had $2.1 billion in notes payable on automobile secured financing outstanding.
WFS Receivables Corporation 4
WFS Receivables Corporation 4, also known as WFSRC4, is a wholly owned, Nevada based, limited purpose corporation. WFSRC4 was organized for the purpose of purchasing contracts from WFS and securitizing them in the asset-backed securities market. Securitizations originated by WFSRC4 include senior notes which are credit enhanced through the issuance of subordinated notes. Securitization transactions in which contracts are sold through WFSRC4 are treated as secured financings for accounting purposes. At December 31, 2003, WFSRC4 had no notes payable on automobile secured financing outstanding.
20
Westran Services Corp.
Westran Services Corp., also known as Westran, is our wholly owned, California based subsidiary, which provides travel-related services for us and our subsidiaries. Westran does not provide a significant source of revenues or expenses.
Western Consumer Products
Western Consumer Products is our wholly owned, California based subsidiary, which was created in 2001 to market non-lending related products such as automobile warranties, maintenance agreements and vehicle security systems.
Western Financial Bank
The Bank is our wholly owned, federally chartered and federally insured savings bank. The Bank provides diversified financial services through its community banking operations, which include a retail banking division and a commercial banking division. Substantially all of our operations are conducted through the Bank and its subsidiary, WFS. The Banks subsidiaries are WFS, which in turn owns all of the stock of WFAL, WFAL2, WFS Investments, Inc., also known as WFSII, WFS Funding, Inc., also known as WFSFI, WFS Receivables Corporation, also known as WFSRC, WFS Receivables Corporation 3, also known as WFSRC3 and WFS Web Investments, also known as WFSWEB. Other subsidiaries of the Bank include Western Auto Investments, Inc., also known as WAI, Westfin Insurance Agency, also known as WFIA, Westhrift, WestFin Securities Corporation, also known as WestFin, Western Reconveyance Company, Inc., also known as RECON, Western Consumer Services, Inc., also known as WCS, and The Hammond Company, The Mortgage Bankers, also known as THCMB. Each of these entities are described in further detail below.
WFS Financial Inc
WFS is an 84% owned operating subsidiary of the Bank that is in the business of financing contracts purchased from automobile dealers. The remaining interest is traded on the Nasdaq National Market® under the ticker symbol WFSI. Each of its offices is licensed to the extent required by law to conduct business in each respective state. The contracts that WFS originates are generally securitized by its subsidiaries, WFAL, WFSFI, WFSRC or WFSRC3 or are sold to WFSRC2 or WFSRC4 for securitization by those entities. See General Automobile Lending Operations. During 2003, WFS originated $6.0 billion of contracts.
WFS Financial Auto Loans, Inc.
WFAL is a wholly owned, Nevada based, limited purpose operating subsidiary of WFS. WFAL was organized primarily for the purpose of purchasing contracts from WFS and securitizing them in the asset-backed securities market. All sales to securitization trusts directly from WFAL were treated as sales for accounting purposes. WFAL has not purchased any automobile contracts since March 2000. In January 2003, we regained control over the assets of the outstanding securitization trusts accounted for as sales for accounting purposes and consolidated all remaining contracts and related notes payable on automobile secured financing outstanding under these trusts. At December 31, 2003, WFAL had $129 million in notes payable on automobile secured financing outstanding.
WFS Financial Auto Loans 2, Inc.
WFAL2 is a wholly owned, Nevada based, limited purpose operating subsidiary of WFS. WFAL2 purchases contracts that are then used as collateral for its reinvestment contract activities. See Transactions with Related Parties Reinvestment Contracts.
WFS Funding, Inc.
WFSFI is a wholly owned, Nevada based, limited purpose service corporation subsidiary of WFS. WFSFI was incorporated for the purpose of providing conduit financings. WFSFI completed a $775 million
21
WFS Investments, Inc.
WFSII is a wholly owned, California based, limited purpose operating subsidiary of WFS. WFSII was incorporated for the purpose of purchasing limited ownership interests in owner trusts in connection with securitization transactions. WFSII is limited by its Articles of Incorporation from engaging in any business activities not incidental or necessary to its stated purpose.
WFS Receivables Corporation
WFSRC is a wholly owned, Nevada based, limited purpose service corporation subsidiary of WFS. WFSRC was incorporated for the purpose of purchasing contracts from WFS and securitizing them in the asset-backed securities market. Securitizations originated by WFSRC are guaranteed under a financial guaranty insurance policy issued by FSA. Securitization transactions in which contracts are sold through WFSRC are treated as secured financings for accounting purposes. At December 31, 2003, WFSRC had $3.7 billion in notes payable on automobile secured financing outstanding.
WFS Receivables Corporation 3
WFSRC3 is a wholly owned, Nevada based, limited purpose service corporation subsidiary of WFS. WFSRC3 was organized for the purpose of purchasing contracts from WFS and securitizing them in the asset-backed securities market. Securitizations originated by WFSRC3 include senior notes that are credit enhanced through the issuance of subordinated notes. Securitization transactions in which contracts are sold through WFSRC3 are treated as secured financings for accounting purposes. At December 31, 2003, WFSRC3 had $4.3 billion in notes payable on automobile secured financing outstanding.
WFS Web Investments
WFSWEB is a wholly owned, California based, limited purpose service corporation subsidiary of WFS. WFSWEB was incorporated for the purpose of investing in an Internet service company called DealerTrack. Our investment in DealerTrack provides us with the opportunity to be involved with a company that provides a business-to-business Internet portal specifically designed for the indirect automobile lending market.
Western Auto Investments, Inc.
WAI is a wholly owned, Nevada based, limited purpose operating subsidiary of the Bank. WAI was incorporated for the purpose of purchasing limited ownership interests in contract securitization transactions. WAI is limited by its articles of incorporation from engaging in any business activities not incidental or necessary to its stated purpose. WAI does not provide a significant source of revenues or expenses.
Westfin Insurance Agency
WFIA is a wholly owned, California based, insurance agency and operating subsidiary of the Bank. WFIA acts as an agent for independent insurers in providing property and casualty insurance, collateral protection insurance and other non-credit related life and disability coverage on contracts made by WFS. WFIA is also a licensed broker-dealer, which sells fixed annuities to the general public. WFIAs revenues consist primarily of commissions received on policies sold to customers.
Westhrift Life Insurance Company
Westhrift is a wholly owned, Arizona based, operating subsidiary of the Bank. Westhrift has a Certificate of Authority from the California Insurance Commissioner authorizing it to conduct insurance business in California. We are in the process of dissolving Westhrift.
22
WestFin Securities Corporation
WestFin is a wholly owned operating subsidiary of the Bank. WestFin was a National Association of Securities Dealers licensed securities broker-dealer of the Bank. Westfin discontinued its operations as of December 31, 2002.
Western Reconveyance Company, Inc.
RECON is a wholly owned, California based, operating subsidiary of the Bank. RECON acts primarily as the trustee under trust deed loans made by the Bank. RECON does not provide a significant source of revenues or expenses.
Western Consumer Services, Inc.
WCS is a wholly owned, California based, operating subsidiary of the Bank. WCS historically conducted real estate development activities through two California limited liability companies, also known as LLCs. The purpose of the LLCs was to acquire, develop and ultimately sell single family residences. WCS has also held properties that were prohibited to be held by the Bank due to regulatory guidelines. The Bank is required to hold dollar for dollar risk-based capital for its investment in WCS. WCS does not currently hold any real estate investments or conduct any real estate development activities.
The Hammond Company, The Mortgage Bankers
THCMB is a wholly owned, California based, operating subsidiary of the Bank. THCMB was acquired in 1995 for the purposes of providing retail mortgage banking services. In 1996, THCMB activities were moved into the Bank. THCMB does not currently conduct any business.
Associates
At December 31, 2003, we had 2,203 full-time and 117 part-time associates. None of our associates are represented by a collective bargaining unit or union. We believe we have good relations with our associates.
Item 2. Properties
At December 31, 2003, we owned eight properties in California and one property in Texas and leased 55 properties at various locations in various states.
Our executive offices are located at 23 Pasteur, Irvine, California. The remaining owned and leased properties are used as retail branch offices, automobile lending regional business centers and other operational centers. At December 31, 2003, the net book value of property and leasehold improvements was approximately $55.1 million. We lease space at one location from a company controlled by the Chairman of the Board of our company and our majority shareholder.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We or our subsidiaries are involved as parties to certain legal proceedings incidental to our business, including Lee, et al. v. WFS Financial Inc, United States District Court, Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville, No. 3-02-0570 filed June 17, 2002 (a putative class action raising claims under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act) and other similar cases. We are vigorously defending these actions and do not believe that the outcome of these proceedings will have a material effect upon our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
23
PART II
Item 5. | Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters |
Price Range by Quarter
Our common stock has been publicly traded since 1986 and is currently traded on the New York Stock Exchange, also known as the NYSE, identified by the symbol, WES. The following table illustrates the high and low prices by quarter in 2003 and 2002, as reported by the NYSE, which prices are believed to represent actual transactions:
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||
High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||||||
First Quarter
|
$ | 23.25 | $ | 18.30 | $ | 22.55 | $ | 15.70 | ||||||||
Second Quarter
|
29.80 | 18.60 | 31.95 | 22.50 | ||||||||||||
Third Quarter
|
36.86 | 27.30 | 31.41 | 18.10 | ||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter
|
39.25 | 34.13 | 21.63 | 16.92 |
We had 6,521 shareholders of our common stock at February 27, 2004. The number of shareholders was determined by the number of record holders, including the number of individual participants, in security position listings.
Dividends
We paid cash dividends of $0.51, $0.47 and $0.43 per share for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. On February 25, 2004, we declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.14 per share for shareholders of record as of May 4, 2004. This dividend is payable on May 18, 2004. There are no restrictions on the payment of dividends by Westcorp.
The Bank is restricted by regulation and by the indentures relating to the subordinated debentures as to the amount of funds that can be transferred to us in the form of dividends or other capital distributions. See Note 19 to the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition Dividends. Under the most restrictive of these terms, on December 31, 2003, the Banks restricted shareholders equity totaled $467 million with a maximum dividend of $218 million. The Bank must notify the OTS of its intent to declare cash dividends 30 days before declaration and may not pay a dividend or make a loan to us for any purpose to the extent we engage in any activities not permitted for a bank holding company.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
On July 7, 2003 Westcorp sold 700,000 shares of its common stock directly to affiliates of Westcorps chairman and controlling shareholder, Ernest Rady and 130,000 shares directly to the Westcorp Employee Stock Ownership Plan, also known as the ESOP in an unregistered private placement. The shares were sold at a price of $28.00 per share. Westcorp did not pay any underwriting discounts or commissions in connection with these sales, resulting in proceeds to Westcorp of $19,600,000 and $3,640,000, respectively. The price paid by the affiliates of Mr. Rady and the ESOP was identical to the price to public paid in connection with the registered underwritten offering of 5,274,000 shares of Westcorps common stock which closed on July 8, 2003. Westcorp paid underwriting discounts and commissions of $1.40 per share in connection with that public offering. The sales of its common stock to affiliates of Mr. Rady and to the ESOP were exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as the sales were made directly from Westcorp to the purchasers without any public offering.
24
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data |
The following table presents summary audited financial data for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000 and 1999. Since this table is only a summary and does not provide all of the information contained in our financial statements, including the related notes, you should read our Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere herein. Certain amounts from the prior years Consolidated Financial Statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
At or For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Statements of
Operations:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income
|
$ | 1,245,017 | $ | 1,142,940 | $ | 962,627 | $ | 583,821 | $ | 297,616 | |||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
531,436 | 530,916 | 491,944 | 313,872 | 152,788 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
713,581 | 612,024 | 470,683 | 269,949 | 144,828 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses
|
294,006 | 306,233 | 196,977 | 82,133 | 38,400 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for credit
losses
|
419,575 | 305,791 | 273,706 | 187,816 | 106,428 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest income
|
110,157 | 90,653 | 78,899 | 177,884 | 212,138 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest expense
|
281,788 | 251,306 | 244,871 | 220,973 | 217,958 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income before income tax
|
247,944 | 145,138 | 107,734 | 144,727 | 100,608 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income tax
|
98,275 | 52,267 | 41,675 | 58,132 | 41,460 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income before minority interest
|
149,669 | 92,871 | 66,059 | 86,595 | 59,148 | ||||||||||||||||||
Minority interest in earnings of subsidiaries
|
26,064 | 13,153 | 10,369 | 11,852 | 6,522 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 123,605 | $ | 79,718 | $ | 55,690 | $ | 74,743 | $ | 52,626 | |||||||||||||
Weighted average number of shares and common
share equivalents diluted
|
43,397,211 | 38,922,611 | 34,485,127 | 29,525,677 | 26,505,128 | ||||||||||||||||||
Earnings per common share diluted
|
$ | 2.85 | $ | 2.05 | $ | 1.61 | $ | 2.53 | $ | 1.99 | |||||||||||||
Dividends declared per common share
|
0.52 | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.30 | 0.20 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividend payout ratio
|
18.2 | % | 23.4 | % | 27.3 | % | 11.9 | % | 10.1 | % | |||||||||||||
Consolidated Statements of Financial
Condition:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks
|
$ | 382,082 | $ | 84,215 | $ | 104,327 | $ | 128,763 | $ | 171,365 | |||||||||||||
Loans:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer(1)
|
10,777,829 | 9,063,755 | 7,092,959 | 4,309,317 | 1,516,669 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage(2)
|
236,223 | 282,930 | 373,455 | 507,431 | 598,302 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
124,431 | 97,216 | 85,312 | 107,586 | 66,927 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
2,701,797 | 2,649,657 | 2,092,225 | 2,230,448 | 1,431,376 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investments and time deposits
|
363,148 | 128,529 | 74,957 | 35,101 | 33,423 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other assets
|
332,012 | 445,689 | 427,380 | 653,270 | 744,929 | ||||||||||||||||||
Less: Allowance for credit losses
|
301,602 | 269,352 | 178,218 | 104,006 | 64,217 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 14,615,920 | $ | 12,482,639 | $ | 10,072,397 | $ | 7,867,910 | $ | 4,498,774 | |||||||||||||
Liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
$ | 1,972,856 | $ | 1,974,984 | $ | 2,329,326 | $ | 2,478,487 | $ | 2,212,309 | |||||||||||||
Notes payable on automobile secured financing
|
10,254,641 | 8,494,678 | 5,886,227 | 3,473,377 | 461,104 | ||||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances and other borrowings
|
560,179 | 618,766 | 723,675 | 616,193 | 498,901 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated debt
|
394,854 | 400,561 | 147,714 | 189,962 | 199,298 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amounts held on behalf of trustee
|
177,642 | 280,496 | 494,858 | 687,274 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities
|
179,471 | 101,145 | 85,994 | 71,221 | 59,140 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities
|
13,362,001 | 11,767,776 | 9,453,432 | 7,324,098 | 4,118,026 | ||||||||||||||||||
Minority interest in equity of subsidiaries
|
131,434 | 101,666 | 78,261 | 56,644 | 28,030 | ||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity
|
1,122,485 | 613,197 | 540,704 | 487,168 | 352,718 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
$ | 14,615,920 | $ | 12,482,639 | $ | 10,072,397 | $ | 7,867,910 | $ | 4,498,774 | |||||||||||||
25
At or For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Selected Financial Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Average managed automobile contracts
|
$ | 10,051,754 | $ | 8,845,635 | $ | 7,576,681 | $ | 6,076,814 | $ | 4,840,363 | ||||||||||||
Return on average managed automobile contracts(3)
|
1.23 | % | 0.90 | % | 0.74 | % | 1.23 | % | 1.09 | % | ||||||||||||
Average shareholders equity(4)
|
$ | 858,927 | $ | 654,109 | $ | 570,298 | $ | 450,323 | $ | 351,162 | ||||||||||||
Return on average shareholders equity(4)
|
14.39 | % | 12.19 | % | 9.77 | % | 16.60 | % | 14.99 | % | ||||||||||||
Total equity to assets (5)
|
9.04 | % | 6.54 | % | 6.75 | % | 7.10 | % | 8.94 | % | ||||||||||||
Book value per share(4)
|
$ | 23.00 | $ | 18.23 | $ | 16.80 | $ | 15.72 | $ | 14.06 | ||||||||||||
Originations:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans
|
$ | 5,983,492 | $ | 5,419,296 | $ | 4,869,970 | $ | 4,232,115 | $ | 3,355,732 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage loans
|
25,622 | 23,950 | 23,001 | 33,124 | 276,936 | |||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans
|
407,387 | 354,439 | 291,944 | 266,342 | 237,316 | |||||||||||||||||
Total loan originations
|
$ | 6,416,501 | $ | 5,797,685 | $ | 5,184,915 | $ | 4,531,581 | $ | 3,869,984 | ||||||||||||
Interest rate spread
|
4.95 | % | 5.14 | % | 4.85 | % | 4.37 | % | 3.59 | % |
(1) | Net of unearned discounts. |
(2) | Net of undisbursed loan proceeds. |
(3) | Net income divided by average automobile contracts managed. |
(4) | Excludes accumulated other comprehensive loss. |
(5) | Excludes accumulated other comprehensive loss and includes minority interest. |
26
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto and other information included or incorporated by reference herein.
Overview
Our primary sources of revenue are net interest income and noninterest income. Net interest income is the difference between the income earned on interest earning assets and the interest paid on interest bearing liabilities. We generate interest income from our loan portfolio, which consists of consumer, mortgage and commercial loans, and from investments in mortgage-backed securities and other short-term investments. We fund our loan portfolio and investments with deposits, advances from the FHLB, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securitizations, other borrowings and equity.
Noninterest income is primarily made up of revenues generated from the sale and servicing of contracts and real estate loans. The primary components of noninterest income include late charges and other collection related fee income on managed contracts, retained interest income or expense, gain on sale of contracts and real estate loans, and contractual servicing income on contracts in securitization transactions treated as sales for accounting purposes. Since March 2000, we have structured our securitizations as secured financings and no longer record non-cash gain on sale at the time of each securitization or record subsequent contractual servicing and retained interest income, the valuation of which is based upon subjective assumptions. Rather, the earnings of the contracts in the trust and the related financing costs are reflected over the life of the underlying pool of contracts as net interest income. In addition, our provision for credit losses has increased as we hold securitized loans on our balance sheet.
Our decision to account for our securitizations as secured financings rather than as sales was based upon a business philosophy that focuses on presenting high quality, cash-based earnings and maintaining a conservative, well-capitalized balance sheet. We believe that a presentation in which assets and liabilities remain on the balance sheet for securitization transactions treated as secured financings provides a better understanding of our business and the inherent risks associated with our securitizations. Since March 2000, in order to account for some of our securitizations as secured financings rather than as sales, those securitizations include a provision that provides us with the right to repurchase contracts at any time as defined under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. The percentage of contracts that we may repurchase was increased from 10% to 20% as of March 2000. Other securitization transactions since March 2000 allow the securitization trust to invest in and sell other financial assets. We believe that our decision to make these accounting changes created a transitional period during which our earnings were adversely impacted as we built our on balance sheet portfolio of loans. This change affected the comparability of our financial statements from 2000 through 2003.
For more than 30 years, we believe that our business model has been successful in a variety of environments. Nationwide recession, high unemployment, weak wholesale auction values, record personal bankruptcies and record low interest rates created a challenging operating landscape in 2003. Through it all, we kept credit losses under control, maintained strong net interest margins and leveraged our operating platform to produce record net income. The following are highlights for 2003:
| We produced record earnings of $124 million in net income, a 55% increase over 2002. | |
| Earnings per share increased to a record $2.85 per share. | |
| Net interest income rose 17% to $714 million while risk adjusted spreads were nearly identical to 2002. | |
| Credit losses declined in 2003 to 2.60% of contracts. | |
| Operating expenses represent 34% of total revenues, our most efficient year ever. | |
| We originated $6.0 billion in automobile contracts through our relationships with 8,000 dealers throughout the country. |
27
| Our portfolio of automobile contracts of $10.6 billion consists of more than 80% prime credit quality contracts. | |
| Delinquencies at year end were 2.9% of total outstanding contracts, which is 0.6% lower than a year earlier. | |
| We successfully expanded our securitization program by offering senior/ subordinated securities on a regular basis. | |
| We currently manage over $10 billion of securities outstanding under our securitization program. |
Business Risks
Our operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected by any of the following business risks. In addition to the risks described below, we may encounter risks that are not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial, which may also impair our business operations.
Regulatory Requirements May Restrict Our Ability to Do Business
The Bank and its subsidiaries are subject to inspection and regulation by the OTS pursuant to HOLA. The OTS is the primary federal banking agency responsible for its supervision and regulation. The OTS has the power to enforce HOLA and its regulations by a variety of actions ranging from a memorandum of understanding to cease and desist proceedings under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. The OTS can take such action based solely upon its determination that we have violated one or more of the laws or regulations to which we are subject or that any aspect of our business is being conducted in an unsafe or unsound manner. As such, the OTS has broad powers to, among other things, require us to change our business practices, hold additional capital and change management. Such action could have a material adverse impact on our business and may impact our securities prices, including our common stock, and access to the capital markets.
HOLA limits the amount of our consumer loans, commercial loans and investment in service corporations. See Business Supervision and Regulation - Investment Restrictions. Our securitization activities are structured to enable the Bank to remove securitized automobile contracts from the HOLA consumer loan limitation calculation. Changes in the OTSs interpretation of HOLA as it affects our securitization activities could cause us to change the manner in which we securitize automobile contracts or to limit our acquisition of such contracts, thereby negatively impacting the price of our common stock. Furthermore, if we are unable to continue to securitize the automobile contracts we purchase, this regulatory limitation may force us to limit our acquisition of new automobile contracts, thereby adversely affecting our ability to remain a preferred source of financing for the dealers from whom we purchase automobile contracts, or cause us to fail the regulatory limitations. Any such limitations may also have a material adverse effect on our financial position, liquidity and results of operations. In addition, other regulatory actions taken by the OTS could have a negative impact on the price of our common stock.
OTS Guidance Regarding Subprime Lending May Affect the Banks Capital Requirements
The OTS, along with other federal banking regulatory agencies, has adopted guidance pertaining to subprime lending programs. Pursuant to the guidance, lending programs which provide credit to borrowers whose credit histories reflect specified negative characteristics, such as recent bankruptcies or payment delinquencies, are deemed to be subprime lending programs for regulatory purposes. Many of the contracts that we originate possess one or more of the factors identified in the guidance as indicative of a subprime loan for this purpose. Pursuant to the guidance, examiners may require that an institution with a lending program deemed to be subprime hold additional capital that ranges from one and one-half to three times the normal capital required for similar loans made to borrowers who are not deemed to be subprime borrowers.
Because many of the automobile contracts we originate possess one or more of the factors identified in the guidance as indicative of a subprime loan, the Bank maintains its capital levels higher than would otherwise be required by regulations. Maintenance of higher capital levels by the Bank may slow our growth, require us to raise additional capital or sell assets, all of which could negatively impact our earnings. We
28
Other Regulatory Requirements May Affect Our Ability to Do Business
Our operations are subject to regulation, supervision and licensing under various federal, state and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. In most states in which we operate, a consumer credit regulatory agency regulates and enforces laws relating to consumer lenders and sales finance agencies such as WFS. These rules and regulations generally provide for licensing of sales finance agencies, limitations on the amount, duration and charges, including interest rates, for various categories of loans, requirements as to the form and content of finance contracts and other documentation, and restrictions on collection practices and creditors rights. So long as WFS is an operating subsidiary of the Bank, licensing and certain other of these requirements are not applicable to WFS due to federal preemption.
We are also subject to extensive federal regulation, including the Truth in Lending Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act. These laws require us to provide certain disclosures to prospective borrowers and protect against discriminatory lending practices and unfair credit practices. The principal disclosures required under the Truth in Lending Act include the terms of repayment, the total finance charge and the annual percentage rate charged on each loan. The Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibits creditors from discriminating against loan applicants on the basis of race, color, sex, age or marital status. Pursuant to Regulation B promulgated under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, creditors are required to make certain disclosures regarding consumer rights and advise consumers whose credit applications are not approved of the reasons for the rejection. In addition, the credit scoring system we use must comply with the requirements for such a system as set forth in the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B. The Fair Credit Reporting Act requires us to provide certain information to consumers whose credit applications are not approved on the basis of a report obtained from a consumer reporting agency. Additionally, we are subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which requires us to maintain privacy with respect to certain consumer data in our possession and to periodically communicate with consumers on privacy matters. We are also subject to the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, and similar state laws, which requires us to reduce the interest rate charged on each loan to customers who have subsequently joined the military.
The dealers that originate automobile contracts we purchase also must comply with both state and federal credit and trade practice statutes and regulations. Failure of the dealers to comply with these statutes and regulations could result in consumers having rights of rescission and other remedies that could have an adverse effect on us.
We believe that we maintain all material licenses and permits required for our current operations and are in substantial compliance with all applicable local, state and federal regulations. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to maintain all requisite licenses and permits, and the failure to satisfy those and other regulatory requirements could have a material adverse effect on our operations. Further, the adoption of additional, or the revision of existing, rules and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We are subject to routine periodic examinations by the OTS on a variety of financial and regulatory matters. The Banks most recent annual safety and soundness examination by the OTS was completed in July 2003.
Adverse Economic Conditions May Impact Our Profitability
Delinquencies, defaults, repossessions and credit losses generally increase during periods of economic slowdown, recession or higher unemployment. These periods also may be accompanied by decreased consumer demand for automobiles and declining values of automobiles securing outstanding contracts, which weakens collateral coverage and increases the amount of loss in the event of default. Significant increases in the inventory of pre-owned automobiles during periods of economic recession also may depress the prices at which repossessed automobiles may be sold or delay the timing of these sales. Because a portion of our borrowers are considered non-prime borrowers, the actual rates of delinquencies, defaults, repossessions and
29
Interest Rate Fluctuations May Impact Our Profitability
Our profitability may be directly affected by the level of and fluctuations in interest rates, which affects the gross interest rate spread we earn on our contracts. As interest rates change, our gross interest rate spread on new originations may increase or decrease depending upon the interest rate environment. In addition, the rates charged on the contracts originated or purchased from dealers are limited by statutory maximums, restricting our opportunity to pass on increased interest costs. We believe that our profitability and liquidity could be adversely affected during any period of changing interest rates, possibly to a material degree. We monitor the interest rate environment and employ our hedging strategies designed to mitigate the impact of changes in interest rates. We cannot assure you that our hedging strategies will mitigate the impact of changes in interest rates.
Wholesale Auction Values May Impact Our Profitability
We sell repossessed automobiles at wholesale auction markets located throughout the United States. Auction proceeds from the sale of repossessed vehicles and other recoveries usually do not cover the outstanding balance of the contracts, and the resulting deficiencies are charged off. Decreased auction proceeds resulting from the depressed prices at which pre-owned automobiles may be sold during periods of economic slowdown or recession will result in higher credit losses for us. Furthermore, depressed wholesale prices for pre-owned automobiles may result from significant liquidations of rental or fleet inventories and from increased volume of trade-ins due to promotional financing programs offered by new vehicle manufacturers. There can be no assurance that our recovery rates will stabilize or improve in the future.
The Ownership of Our Common Stock Is Concentrated, Which May Result in Conflicts of Interest and Actions That Are Not in the Best Interests of Our Other Stockholders
Ernest S. Rady is our founder, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Rady is also the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank and the Chairman of the Board of Directors of WFS. Mr. Rady is the beneficial owner of approximately 54% of our outstanding shares of common stock and is able to exercise significant control over our company. The Westcorp common stock ownership of Mr. Rady enables him to elect all of our directors and effectively control the vote on all matters submitted to a vote of our shareholders, including mergers, sales of all or substantially all of our assets, going private transactions, conversions and other corporate restructurings or reorganizations. Because of the significant block of our common stock controlled by Mr. Rady, decisions may be made that, while in the best interest of Mr. Rady, may not be in the best interest of other stockholders.
We May Not Be Able to Generate Sufficient Operating Cash Flows to Run Our Automobile Finance Operations
Our automobile finance operations require substantial operating cash flows. Operating cash requirements include premiums paid to dealers for acquisition of automobile contracts, expenses incurred in connection with the securitization of automobile contracts, capital expenditures for new technologies and ongoing operating costs. Our primary source of operating cash is the excess cash flows received from securitizations and contracts
30
| the rates and amounts of loan delinquencies, defaults and net credit losses; | |
| how quickly and at what price repossessed vehicles can be resold; | |
| the ages of the contracts in the portfolio; | |
| levels of voluntary prepayments; and | |
| the terms of our securitizations, which include performance based triggers requiring higher levels of credit enhancements to the extent credit losses or delinquencies exceed certain thresholds. We have exceeded performance thresholds in the past and may do so again in the future. |
Any adverse change in these factors could reduce or eliminate excess cash flows to us. Although we currently have positive operating cash flows, we cannot assure you that we will continue to generate positive cash flows in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, liquidity and results of operations.
Changes in Our Securitization Program Could Adversely Affect Our Liquidity and Earnings
Our business depends on our ability to aggregate and sell automobile contracts in the form of asset-backed securities. These sales generate cash proceeds that allow us to repay amounts borrowed and to purchase additional automobile contracts. Changes in our asset-backed securities program could materially adversely affect our earnings or ability to purchase and resell automobile contracts on a timely basis. Such changes could include, among other things, a:
| delay in the completion of a planned securitization; | |
| negative market perception of us; and | |
| failure of the automobile contracts we intend to sell to conform to insurance company and rating agency requirements. |
If we are unable to effectively securitize our automobile contracts, we may have to reduce or even curtail our automobile contract purchasing activities, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial position, liquidity and results of operations.
We Expect Our Operating Results to Continue to Fluctuate, Which May Adversely Impact Our Business
Our results of operations have fluctuated in the past and are expected to fluctuate in the future. Factors that could affect our quarterly earnings include:
| variations in the volume of automobile contracts originated, which historically tend to be lower in the first and fourth quarters of the year; | |
| interest rate spreads; | |
| the effectiveness of our hedging strategies; | |
| credit losses, which historically tend to be higher in the first and fourth quarters of the year; | |
| amount and timing of whole loan sale transactions; and | |
| operating costs. |
31
Critical Accounting Policies
Management believes critical accounting policies are important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations. Critical accounting policies require difficult and complex judgments because they rely on estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain due to the impact of changing market conditions. The following is a summary of accounting policies we consider critical.
Securitization Transactions
Contracts sold by us to our special purpose entity subsidiaries in connection with a securitization transaction are treated as having been sold for bankruptcy purposes. The subsequent transfer of such contracts to the securitization trust is treated as a secured financing under generally accepted accounting principles, also known as GAAP. For GAAP purposes, the contracts are retained on the balance sheet with the securities issued to finance the contracts recorded as notes payable on automobile secured financing. We record interest income on the securitized contracts and interest expense on the notes issued through the securitization transactions.
As servicer of these contracts, we may hold and remit funds collected from the borrowers on behalf of the trustee pursuant to reinvestment contracts that we have entered into or we may send funds to a trustee to be held until the distribution dates, depending on the terms of our securitizations. For securitization transactions that were treated as sales, these amounts were reported as amounts held on behalf of trustee on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
Allowance for Credit Losses
Management determines the amount of the allowance for credit losses based on a review of various quantitative and qualitative analyses. Quantitative analyses include the review of chargeoff trends by loan program and loan type, analysis of cumulative losses, and evaluation of credit loss experience by credit tier and geographic location. Other quantitative analyses include the evaluation of the size of any particular asset group, the concentration of any credit tier, the level of nonperformance and the percentage of delinquency.
Qualitative analyses include trends in chargeoffs over various time periods and at various statistical midpoints and high points, the severity of depreciated values of repossessions or foreclosures, trends in the number of days repossessions are held in inventory, trends in the number of loan modifications, trends in delinquency roll rates, trends in deficiency balance collections both internally and from collection agencies, trends in custom scores and the effectiveness of our custom scores, and trends in the economy generally or in specific geographic locations. Despite these analyses, we recognize that establishing allowance for credit losses is not an exact science and can be highly judgmental in nature.
The analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses is not only dependent upon effective quantitative and qualitative analyses, but also effective loan review and asset classification. We classify our assets in accordance with regulatory guidance. Our multifamily and commercial loan portfolios are evaluated individually while our single family and consumer portfolios are evaluated in pools. We classify our loan portfolios into five categories: Pass, Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful and Loss. Based upon our asset classifications, we establish general and specific valuation allowances.
General valuation allowances are determined by applying various factors to loan balances that are classified as Pass, Special Mention, Substandard or Doubtful. Specific valuation allowances represent loan amounts that are classified as Loss. Some assets may be split into more than one asset classification due to fair value or net realizable value calculations.
All contracts that are 60 to 90 days delinquent are automatically classified as Special Mention. Real estate loans that are manifesting a weakness in performance are classified as Special Mention. Any contract that is 90 or more days delinquent is automatically classified as Substandard. Real estate loans that are manifesting a significant weakness in performance are also classified as Substandard. Any multifamily loan that is impaired is classified as Substandard. Any contract where the borrower has filed for bankruptcy or
32
The allowance for credit losses is increased by charging the provision for credit losses and decreased by actual losses on the loans, by reversing the allowance for credit losses through the provision for credit losses when the amount of loans held on balance sheet is reduced through securitization transactions treated as sales or based on credit trends or economic conditions.
Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Deposits and Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
We may enter into cash flow hedges that will protect against potential changes in interest rates affecting interest payments on future deposits gathered by us and future securities sold under agreements to repurchase. The fair value of the interest rate swap agreements is included in deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, respectively, and any change in the fair value is reported as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Related interest income or expense is settled on a quarterly basis and is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings during the period in which cash flows on the hedged items affect income.
Notes Payable on Automobile Secured Financing
The contracts originated and held by us are fixed rate and, accordingly, we have exposure to changes in interest rates. To protect against potential changes in interest rates affecting interest payments on future securitization transactions, we may enter into various hedge agreements prior to closing the transaction. The market value of these hedge agreements is designed to respond inversely to changes in interest rates. Because of this inverse relationship, we can effectively lock in a gross interest rate spread at the time of entering into the hedge transaction. Gains and losses on these agreements are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Any ineffective portion is recognized in interest expense during that period if the hedge is greater than 100% effective. Upon completion of the securitization transaction, the gains or losses are recognized in full as an adjustment to the gain or loss on the sale of the contracts if the transaction is treated as a sale or amortized on a level yield basis over the duration of the notes issued if the transaction is treated as a secured financing.
If we issue certain variable rate notes payable in connection with our securitization activities, we may also enter into interest rate swap agreements in order to hedge our variable interest rate exposure on future interest payments. See Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk. The fair value of the interest rate swap agreements is included in notes payable on automobile secured financing, and any change in the fair value is reported as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Any ineffective portion is recorded in interest expense during that period if the hedge is greater than 100% effective. Related interest income or expense is settled on a monthly or quarterly basis and recognized as an adjustment to interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
We also enter into interest rate swap agreements or other derivatives that we choose not to designate as hedges or that do not qualify for hedge accounting under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended, also known as SFAS No. 133. These derivatives pertain to variable rate notes issued in conjunction with the securitization of our contracts. Any change in the market value of such derivatives and income or expense recognized on such derivatives is recorded to noninterest income.
33
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
Prior to April 1, 2000, our securitization transactions were structured as sales for accounting purposes. Under this structure the notes issued by our unconsolidated securitization trusts were not recorded as a liability on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Effective January 1, 2003, we regained control over assets of the securitization trusts for all of our outstanding securitization transactions treated as sales for accounting purposes. We recorded $525 million of automobile contracts and the related notes payable on automobile secured financing on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and have eliminated all remaining off balance sheet amounts related to these transactions. At December 31, 2003, we had no off balance sheet arrangements.
Results of Operations
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is affected by our interest rate spread, which is the difference between the rate earned on our interest earning assets and the rate paid on our interest bearing liabilities, and the relative amounts of our interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. Net interest income totaled $714 million, $612 million and $471 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The increase in net interest income for the past three years is primarily the result of us holding a greater percentage of contracts on balance sheet even as overall net interest margins declined.
34
The following table presents information relative to the average balances and interest rates on an owned basis for the periods indicated:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Yield/ | Average | Yield/ | Average | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Interest | Rate | Balance | Interest | Rate | Balance | Interest | Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest earning assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total investments:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
$ | 2,528,870 | $ | 83,663 | 3.31 | % | $ | 2,196,539 | $ | 113,154 | 5.15 | % | $ | 2,242,339 | $ | 133,415 | 5.95 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other short-term investments
|
377,762 | 4,464 | 1.18 | 320,388 | 5,556 | 1.73 | 111,889 | 4,753 | 4.25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities
|
80,626 | 3,057 | 3.79 | 47,983 | 2,815 | 5.87 | 51,899 | 3,272 | 6.30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest earning deposits with others
|
7,869 | 65 | 0.83 | 7,106 | 98 | 1.38 | 2,628 | 74 | 2.80 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total investments
|
2,995,127 | 91,249 | 3.05 | % | 2,572,016 | 121,623 | 4.73 | % | 2,408,755 | 141,514 | 5.87 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans
|
10,225,488 | 1,134,294 | 11.09 | % | 8,181,117 | 993,417 | 12.14 | % | 5,863,676 | 779,256 | 13.29 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans(1)
|
249,905 | 13,577 | 5.43 | 321,742 | 22,501 | 6.99 | 431,110 | 33,849 | 7.85 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans
|
110,296 | 5,409 | 4.90 | 90,642 | 5,035 | 5.55 | 99,904 | 7,321 | 7.33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction loans
|
10,177 | 488 | 4.80 | 7,951 | 364 | 4.57 | 10,694 | 687 | 6.42 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans
|
10,595,866 | 1,153,768 | 10.89 | % | 8,601,452 | 1,021,317 | 11.87 | % | 6,405,384 | 821,113 | 12.82 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest earning assets
|
13,590,993 | 1,245,017 | 9.16 | % | 11,173,468 | 1,142,940 | 10.23 | % | 8,814,139 | 962,627 | 10.92 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest earning assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts due from trusts
|
5,865 | 121,627 | 246,217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retained interest in securitized assets
|
15,888 | 79,832 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Premises and equipment, net
|
80,711 | 80,277 | 82,921 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other assets
|
308,927 | 397,306 | 181,578 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: Allowance for credit losses
|
288,058 | 216,539 | 124,306 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 13,698,438 | $ | 11,572,027 | $ | 9,280,381 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest bearing liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
$ | 1,982,205 | 64,634 | 3.26 | % | $ | 2,196,262 | 80,015 | 3.64 | % | $ | 2,319,466 | 114,831 | 4.95 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to purchase
|
220,989 | 4,544 | 2.06 | 222,154 | 5,543 | 2.50 | 155,387 | 7,014 | 4.51 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances and other borrowings
|
444,280 | 6,221 | 1.40 | 244,284 | 5,281 | 2.16 | 443,337 | 20,424 | 4.61 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes payable on automobile secured financing
|
9,592,483 | 416,577 | 4.34 | 7,426,265 | 406,851 | 5.48 | 5,018,456 | 333,768 | 6.65 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated debentures
|
396,211 | 39,460 | 9.96 | 331,990 | 33,226 | 10.01 | 170,531 | 15,907 | 9.33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest bearing liabilities
|
12,636,168 | 531,436 | 4.21 | % | 10,420,955 | 530,916 | 5.09 | % | 8,107,177 | 491,944 | 6.07 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest bearing liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts held on behalf of trustee
|
10,518 | 240,667 | 387,951 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities
|
284,638 | 323,644 | 257,985 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity
|
767,114 | 586,761 | 527,268 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 13,698,438 | $ | 11,572,027 | $ | 9,280,381 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income and interest rate spread
|
$ | 713,581 | 4.95 | % | $ | 612,024 | 5.14 | % | $ | 470,683 | 4.85 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net yield on average interest earning assets
|
5.25 | % | 5.48 | % | 5.34 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | For the purpose of these computations, nonaccruing loans are included in the average loan amounts outstanding. |
35
The total interest rate spread decreased 19 basis points for 2003 compared with 2002 due to a decrease of 107 basis points in the yield on interest earning assets while the costs of funds decreased only 88 basis points. The decrease in the yield on interest earning assets in 2003 is primarily due to our shift to originating a higher percentage of prime credit quality contracts and an overall lower interest rate environment. The decline in the cost of funds in 2003 compared with 2002 was moderated by the increase in the amount of subordinated debentures held by us during 2003 compared to 2002. The total interest rate spread increased 29 basis points for 2002 compared with 2001 due to a decrease of 69 basis points in the yield on interest earning assets while the costs of funds decreased 98 basis points. The decrease in yield on interest earning assets for 2002 compared with 2001 was due primarily to originating a higher percentage of prime credit quality contracts and a lower interest rate environment. The decrease in the cost of funds in 2002 compared with 2001 was due primarily to a lower interest rate environment.
The following table sets forth the changes in net interest income attributable to changes in volume (change in average portfolio volume multiplied by prior period average rate) and changes in rates (change in weighted average interest rate multiplied by prior period average portfolio balance):
2003 Compared to 2002(1) | 2002 Compared to 2001(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume | Rate | Total | Volume | Rate | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in interest income:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
$ | 15,274 | $ | (44,765 | ) | $ | (29,491 | ) | $ | (2,672 | ) | $ | (17,589 | ) | $ | (20,261 | ) | ||||||||||
Other short-term investments
|
877 | (1,969 | ) | (1,092 | ) | 4,888 | (4,085 | ) | 803 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities
|
1,472 | (1,230 | ) | 242 | (240 | ) | (217 | ) | (457 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Interest earning deposits with others
|
10 | (43 | ) | (33 | ) | 76 | (52 | ) | 24 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total loans:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans
|
232,283 | (91,406 | ) | 140,877 | 286,334 | (72,173 | ) | 214,161 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans
|
(4,463 | ) | (4,461 | ) | (8,924 | ) | (7,925 | ) | (3,423 | ) | (11,348 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Commercial loans
|
1,008 | (634 | ) | 374 | (631 | ) | (1,655 | ) | (2,286 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Construction loans
|
105 | 19 | 124 | (152 | ) | (171 | ) | (323 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest income
|
$ | 246,566 | $ | (144,489 | ) | 102,077 | $ | 279,678 | $ | (99,365 | ) | 180,313 | |||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in interest expense:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
$ | (7,426 | ) | $ | (7,955 | ) | (15,381 | ) | $ | (5,820 | ) | $ | (28,996 | ) | (34,816 | ) | |||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
(29 | ) | (970 | ) | (999 | ) | 2,344 | (3,815 | ) | (1,471 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances and other borrowings
|
3,255 | (2,315 | ) | 940 | (6,935 | ) | (8,208 | ) | (15,143 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Notes payable on automobile secured financings
|
104,511 | (94,785 | ) | 9,726 | 139,398 | (66,315 | ) | 73,083 | |||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated debentures
|
6,401 | (167 | ) | 6,234 | 16,081 | 1,238 | 17,319 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest expense
|
$ | 106,712 | $ | (106,192 | ) | 520 | $ | 145,068 | $ | (106,096 | ) | 38,972 | |||||||||||||||
Increase in net interest income
|
$ | 101,557 | $ | 141,341 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | In the analysis of interest changes due to volume and rate, the changes due to the volume/rate variance (the combined effect of change in weighted average interest rate and change in average portfolio balance) were allocated proportionately based on the absolute value of the volume and rate variances. If there was no balance in the previous year, the total change was allocated to volume. |
Provision for Credit Losses
We maintain an allowance for credit losses to cover probable losses that can be reasonably estimated for the loans held on the balance sheet. The allowance for credit losses is increased by charging the provision for credit losses and decreased by actual losses on such loans or by reversing the allowance for credit losses through the provision for credit losses when the amount of loans held on balance sheet is reduced through
36
The provision for credit losses was $294 million, $306 million and $197 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Net chargeoffs were $262 million, $215 million and $123 million for the same respective periods. The decrease in provision for credit losses from 2002 to 2003 was the result of holding a greater percentage of prime credit quality contracts, which require a lower percentage of allowance for credit losses. The increase in the provision for credit losses from 2001 to 2002 was the result of a greater amount of contracts held on balance sheet.
Noninterest Income
Automobile Lending Income
Since the first quarter of 2000, we have not completed a securitization that has been accounted for as an off balance sheet arrangement. For transactions treated as off balance sheet arrangements prior to April 2000, we recorded a non-cash gain equal to the present value of the estimated future cash flows from the portfolio of contracts sold less the write-off of dealer participation balances and the effect of hedging activities. For these securitizations, net interest earned on the contracts sold was recognized over the life of the transactions as contractual servicing income and retained interest income or expense. Effective January 1, 2003, we regained control over assets of the securitization trusts for all of our outstanding securitization transactions treated as sales for accounting purposes. We no longer recognize retained interest income or expense or contractual servicing income for these securitization transactions on our Consolidated Statements of Income. Rather, we recognize interest income on automobile contracts held in these trusts and record interest expense on notes payable on automobile secured financings.
The components of automobile lending income were as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Fee income
|
$ | 90,511 | $ | 81,087 | $ | 67,579 | |||||||
Contractual servicing income
|
10,735 | 23,018 | |||||||||||
Retained interest expense, net of RISA
amortization
|
(29,490 | ) | (27,839 | ) | |||||||||
Total automobile lending income
|
$ | 90,511 | $ | 62,332 | $ | 62,758 | |||||||
Fee income consists primarily of documentation fees, late charges and deferment fees on our managed portfolio, including contracts securitized in transactions accounted for as sales and secured financings, as well as contracts not securitized. The increase in fee income is due to the growth in our average managed portfolio to $10.1 billion in 2003 from $8.8 billion in 2002 and $7.6 billion in 2001.
There was no contractual servicing income for the year ended December 31, 2003 due to our transition to treating our securitizations as secured financings rather than as sales as well as our regaining control over the assets of the trusts for all our outstanding securitization transactions previously treated as sales for accounting purposes. For securitization transactions previously treated as sales for accounting purposes, we earned contractual servicing income on the outstanding balance of contracts serviced.
37
There was no retained interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 as a result of our reconsolidating all remaining off balance sheet trusts on January 1, 2003. For accounting purposes, this expense is recognized only on contracts sold through securitizations treated as sales. Retained interest expense is dependent upon the average excess spread on the contracts sold, credit losses, the size of the sold portfolio and the amount of amortization of the RISA. The retained interest expense recognized in 2002 and 2001 was the result of higher chargeoffs on our sold portfolio as well as revised estimates of future chargeoffs due to continued slowing in the economy. Net chargeoffs on the sold portfolio decreased to $30.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $50.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. The outstanding sold portfolio had a weighted average gross interest rate spread of 6.71% and 6.97% for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The average balance of the sold portfolio was $840 million and $1.8 billion for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
The following table sets forth our contract sales and securitizations and related gain on sales:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Contract sales and secured financings:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Secured financings(1)
|
$ | 5,889,375 | $ | 6,925,000 | $ | 4,220,000 | $ | 3,930,000 | $ | 500,000 | ||||||||||||
Sales to securitization trusts
|
660,000 | 2,500,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total sales and secured financings
|
$ | 5,889,375 | $ | 6,925,000 | $ | 4,220,000 | $ | 4,590,000 | $ | 3,000,000 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of contracts(2)
|
$ | 7,719 | $ | 51,345 | ||||||||||||||||||
Hedge gain on sale of contracts(3)
|
5,300 | 7,419 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of contracts as a percent of total
revenues
|
1.72 | % | 14.47 | % |
(1) | Information for 2002, 2001 and 1999 includes $775 million, $650 million, and $500 million, respectively, of contracts securitized in privately placed conduit facilities. |
(2) | Net of the write-off of outstanding dealer participation balances and the effect of hedging activities. |
(3) | Included in gain on sale of contracts. |
38
The following table lists each of our public securitizations:
Remaining | Remaining Balance | Original | Original Weighted | Gross | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue | Original | Balance at | as a Percent of | Weighted | Average | Interest Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Close Date | Balance | December 31, 2003(1) | Original Balance | Average APR | Securitization Rate | Spread(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1985-A | December, 1985 | $ | 110,000 | Paid in full | 18.50 | % | 8.38 | % | 10.12 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
1986-A | November, 1986 | 191,930 | Paid in full | 14.20 | 6.63 | 7.57 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1987-A | March, 1987 | 125,000 | Paid in full | 12.42 | 6.75 | 5.67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1987-B | July, 1987 | 110,000 | Paid in full | 12.68 | 7.80 | 4.88 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1988-A | February, 1988 | 155,000 | Paid in full | 13.67 | 7.75 | 5.92 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1988-B | May, 1988 | 100,000 | Paid in full | 14.01 | 8.50 | 5.51 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1988-C | July, 1988 | 100,000 | Paid in full | 15.41 | 8.50 | 6.91 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1988-D | October, 1988 | 105,000 | Paid in full | 14.95 | 8.85 | 6.10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1989-A | March, 1989 | 75,000 | Paid in full | 15.88 | 10.45 | 5.43 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1989-B | June, 1989 | 100,000 | Paid in full | 15.96 | 9.15 | 6.81 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1990-A | August, 1990 | 150,000 | Paid in full | 16.05 | 8.35 | 7.70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1990-1 | November, 1990 | 150,000 | Paid in full | 15.56 | 8.50 | 7.06 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1991-1 | April, 1991 | 200,000 | Paid in full | 16.06 | 7.70 | 8.36 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1991-2 | May, 1991 | 200,000 | Paid in full | 15.75 | 7.30 | 8.45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1991-3 | August, 1991 | 175,000 | Paid in full | 15.69 | 6.75 | 8.94 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1991-4 | December, 1991 | 150,000 | Paid in full | 15.53 | 5.63 | 9.90 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1992-1 | March, 1992 | 150,000 | Paid in full | 14.49 | 5.85 | 8.64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1992-2 | June, 1992 | 165,000 | Paid in full | 14.94 | 5.50 | 9.44 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1992-3 | September, 1992 | 135,000 | Paid in full | 14.45 | 4.70 | 9.75 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1993-1 | March, 1993 | 250,000 | Paid in full | 13.90 | 4.45 | 9.45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1993-2 | June, 1993 | 175,000 | Paid in full | 13.77 | 4.70 | 9.07 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1993-3 | September, 1993 | 187,500 | Paid in full | 13.97 | 4.25 | 9.72 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1993-4 | December, 1993 | 165,000 | Paid in full | 12.90 | 4.60 | 8.30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1994-1 | March, 1994 | 200,000 | Paid in full | 13.67 | 5.10 | 8.57 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1994-2 | May, 1994 | 230,000 | Paid in full | 14.04 | 6.38 | 7.66 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1994-3 | August, 1994 | 200,000 | Paid in full | 14.59 | 6.65 | 7.94 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1994-4 | October, 1994 | 212,000 | Paid in full | 15.58 | 7.10 | 8.48 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1995-1 | January, 1995 | 190,000 | Paid in full | 15.71 | 8.05 | 7.66 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1995-2 | March, 1995 | 190,000 | Paid in full | 16.36 | 7.10 | 9.26 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1995-3 | June, 1995 | 300,000 | Paid in full | 15.05 | 6.05 | 9.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1995-4 | September, 1995 | 375,000 | Paid in full | 15.04 | 6.20 | 8.84 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1995-5 | December, 1995 | 425,000 | Paid in full | 15.35 | 5.88 | 9.47 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1996-A | March, 1996 | 485,000 | Paid in full | 15.46 | 6.13 | 9.33 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1996-B | June, 1996 | 525,000 | Paid in full | 15.74 | 6.75 | 8.99 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1996-C | September, 1996 | 535,000 | Paid in full | 15.83 | 6.60 | 9.23 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1996-D | December, 1996 | 545,000 | Paid in full | 15.43 | 6.17 | 9.26 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1997-A | March, 1997 | 500,000 | Paid in full | 15.33 | 6.60 | 8.73 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1997-B | June, 1997 | 590,000 | Paid in full | 15.36 | 6.37 | 8.99 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1997-C | September, 1997 | 600,000 | Paid in full | 15.43 | 6.17 | 9.26 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1997-D | December, 1997 | 500,000 | Paid in full | 15.19 | 6.34 | 8.85 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1998-A | March, 1998 | 525,000 | Paid in full | 14.72 | 6.01 | 8.71 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1998-B | June, 1998 | 660,000 | Paid in full | 14.68 | 6.06 | 8.62 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1998-C | November, 1998 | 700,000 | Paid in full | 14.42 | 5.81 | 8.61 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999-A | January, 1999 | 1,000,000 | Paid in full | 14.42 | 5.70 | 8.72 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999-B(3) | July, 1999 | 1,000,000 | $57,856 | 5.79 | % | 14.62 | 6.36 | 8.26 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1999-C | November, 1999 | 500,000 | Paid in full | 14.77 | 7.01 | 7.76 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2000-A | March, 2000 | 1,200,000 | 128,805 | 10.73 | 14.66 | 7.28 | 7.38 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2000-B(4) | May, 2000 | 1,000,000 | 116,746 | 11.67 | 14.84 | 7.78 | 7.06 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2000-C | August, 2000 | 1,390,000 | 230,390 | 16.57 | 15.04 | 7.32 | 7.72 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2000-D | November, 2000 | 1,000,000 | 217,831 | 21.78 | 15.20 | 6.94 | 8.26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2001-A | January, 2001 | 1,000,000 | 245,123 | 24.51 | 14.87 | 5.77 | 9.10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2001-B | May, 2001 | 1,370,000 | 356,102 | 25.99 | 14.41 | 4.23 | 10.18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2001-C | August, 2001 | 1,200,000 | 397,936 | 33.16 | 13.90 | 4.50 | 9.40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2002-1 | March, 2002 | 1,800,000 | 818,991 | 45.50 | 13.50 | 4.26 | 9.24 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2002-2 | May, 2002 | 1,750,000 | 927,306 | 52.99 | 12.51 | 3.89 | 8.62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2002-3 | August, 2002 | 1,250,000 | 737,185 | 58.97 | 12.30 | 3.06 | 9.24 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2002-4 | November, 2002 | 1,350,000 | 928,067 | 68.75 | 12.18 | 2.66 | 9.52 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2003-1 | February, 2003 | 1,343,250 | 965,251 | 71.86 | 11.79 | 2.42 | 9.37 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2003-2 | May, 2003 | 1,492,500 | 1,200,666 | 80.45 | 11.57 | 2.13 | 9.44 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2003-3 | August, 2003 | 1,650,000 | 1,551,109 | 94.01 | 10.59 | 2.66 | 7.93 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2003-4 | November, 2003 | 1,403,625 | 1,403,625 | 100.00 | 10.89 | 2.70 | 8.19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2004-1 | February, 2004 | 1,477,500 | 10.89 | 2.36 | 8.53 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 36,088,305 | $10,282,989 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Represents only the note payable amounts outstanding at the date indicated. |
(2) | Represents the difference between the original weighted average annual percentage rate, also known as APR, and the estimated weighted average securitization rate on the closing date of the securitization. |
(3) | Redeemed on January 20, 2004. |
(4) | Redeemed on February 20, 2004. |
39
Other Noninterest Income
Other noninterest income consists primarily of insurance income, mortgage banking income and miscellaneous income. Other noninterest income totaled $19.6 million, $28.3 million and $16.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Noninterest income decreased for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared with the year ended December 31, 2002 and increased for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared with the year ended December 31, 2001 due to the sale of our seven Northern California branch offices in 2002.
Noninterest Expense
Total noninterest expense was $282 million, $251 million and $245 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Noninterest expense as a percentage of total revenues improved to 34% in 2003 compared to 36% in 2002 and 45% in 2001. The improvement in operating efficiencies from 2001 to 2003 was achieved through the centralization and automation of certain processes as well as the deployment of new technologies.
The efficiencies realized include increasing the conversion ratios on contracts purchased through dealer education, automating the loan application and underwriting system, increasing the percentage of applications received via the Internet, outsourcing the data entry process, centralizing the verification process, and implementing proprietary credit scorecards and electronic funds transfers for our dealers. Operating efficiencies also include implementing automated dialers, centralizing and upgrading payment processing and asset recovery processes, upgrading toll-free lines for customer service and interactive voice response technology, implementing direct debit for our borrowers, imaging for record retention and retrieval, and implementing a new behavioral scoring collection system.
Income Taxes
We file federal and certain state tax returns with our subsidiaries. We file other state tax returns as a separate entity. Tax liabilities from the consolidated returns are allocated in accordance with a tax sharing agreement based on the relative income or loss of each entity on a stand-alone basis. Our effective tax rate was 40%, 36% and 39% for the years ended 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The relatively lower effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2002 is a result of a one-time benefit of legislation enacted by the State of California that eliminated the use of the reserve method of accounting for bad debts for large banks and financial corporations for taxable income purposes for tax years after January 1, 2002. In the first year of this change, 50% of the ending reserve amount deducted from taxable income in prior periods was included in California taxable income. The remaining 50% of the reserve was not required to be recaptured into income, but rather represented a permanent difference between GAAP and California tax accounting. The deferred tax liability related to this permanent difference was eliminated from our balance sheet and the state income tax provision for 2002 was reduced accordingly. See Business Taxation.
Financial Condition
Overview
We originated $6.0 billion and $5.4 billion of contracts for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. As a result of higher contract originations, our portfolio of managed contracts reached $10.6 billion at December 31, 2003, up from $9.4 billion at December 31, 2002.
Total demand deposits and money market accounts at our retail banking division were $608 million at December 31, 2003 compared with $490 million at December 31, 2002. Total demand deposit and money market accounts represented 48% of total retail banking deposits at December 31, 2003 compared with 36% at December 31, 2002. The commercial banking division had deposits of $424 million at December 31, 2003 compared with $277 million at December 31, 2002.
40
Investment and Other Securities
Our investment and other securities portfolio consists of short-term securities, including repurchase agreements and overnight investments in federal funds. These short-term securities are maintained primarily for liquidity purposes. Additionally, we own FHLB stock as required by our affiliation with the FHLB System and carry it at cost. The FHLB stock is included in investment securities available for sale on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. We also hold owner trust certificates and obligations of states and political subdivisions, which are classified as available for sale. The owner trust certificates are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value. The obligations of states and political subdivisions are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reflected as a separate component of shareholders equity on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of applicable taxes.
The following table summarizes our investment securities at the dates indicated:
December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest bearing deposits
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
with other financial institutions
|
$ | 41,009 | $ | 59,004 | $ | 720 | $ | 720 | $ | 720 | |||||||||||
Other short-term investments
|
291,000 | 35,000 | 66,500 | 137,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Investment securities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
1,046 | 1,549 | 1,533 | 1,506 | |||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agencies and corporations
|
50,493 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Owner trust certificates
|
3,348 | 4,668 | 6,517 | 7,865 | |||||||||||||||||
FHLB stock
|
58,803 | 46,341 | 64,446 | 24,367 | 23,313 | ||||||||||||||||
Other
|
8,453 | 6,031 | 4,294 | 2,684 | 739 | ||||||||||||||||
$ | 449,758 | $ | 115,770 | $ | 110,677 | $ | 102,321 | $ | 171,143 | ||||||||||||
The following table sets forth the stated maturities of our investment securities at December 31, 2003:
Up to | One Year | Five Years | Ten Years | No Stated | |||||||||||||||||
One Year | to Five Years | to Ten Years | or More | Maturity | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest bearing deposits with other financial
institutions
|
$ | 41,009 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other short-term investments
|
291,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agencies and corporations
|
$ | 50,493 | |||||||||||||||||||
FHLB stock
|
$ | 58,803 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
179 | $ | 1,271 | $ | 3,996 | 3,007 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 332,009 | $ | 50,672 | $ | 1,271 | $ | 3,996 | $ | 61,810 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average interest rate(1)
|
1.18 | % | 2.49 | % | 1.18 | % | 3.07 | % | 4.35 | % |
(1) | Calculated based on amortized cost. |
41
Mortgage-Backed Securities
We invest in MBS to generate net interest margin, manage interest rate risk, provide another source of liquidity through repurchase agreements and meet regulatory requirements. Our MBS portfolio is classified as available for sale. Accordingly, the portfolio is reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reflected as a separate component of shareholders equity on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of applicable taxes. The following table summarizes our MBS portfolio by issuer:
December 31, | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||
Available for sale securities:
|
|||||||||
GNMA certificates
|
$ | 2,638,085 | $ | 2,607,457 | |||||
FNMA participation certificates
|
25,273 | 39,124 | |||||||
FHLMC participation certificates
|
36,665 | 1,068 | |||||||
Other
|
1,774 | 2,008 | |||||||
$ | 2,701,797 | $ | 2,649,657 | ||||||
The portfolio had a weighted average yield, including effects of amortization of premiums and discounts, of 3.31%, 5.14% and 5.95% for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The weighted average coupon rate was 3.55%, 6.96% and 7.48% at December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Our MBS portfolio had maturities of one month to thirty years at December 31, 2003, although payments are generally received monthly throughout the life of these securities.
Loan Portfolios
The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio by type of loan, including loans held for sale, as of the dates indicated:
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contracts
|
$ | 10,833,127 | 97.3 | % | $ | 9,147,937 | 96.9 | % | $ | 7,192,302 | 95.2 | % | $ | 4,390,265 | 89.2 | % | $ | 1,549,966 | 71.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
6,002 | 0.1 | 7,531 | 0.1 | 8,826 | 0.1 | 13,456 | 0.3 | 20,951 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10,839,129 | 97.4 | 9,155,468 | 97.0 | 7,201,128 | 95.3 | 4,403,721 | 89.5 | 1,570,917 | 72.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: Unearned interest
|
61,300 | 0.6 | 91,713 | 1.0 | 108,169 | 1.4 | 94,404 | 1.9 | 54,248 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total consumer loans
|
10,777,829 | 96.8 | 9,063,755 | 96.0 | 7,092,959 | 93.9 | 4,309,317 | 87.6 | 1,516,669 | 69.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Existing properties
|
237,668 | 2.1 | 277,233 | 3.0 | 361,115 | 4.8 | 498,963 | 10.1 | 589,286 | 27.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction
|
16,503 | 0.2 | 14,150 | 0.1 | 15,638 | 0.2 | 14,784 | 0.3 | 23,190 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
254,171 | 2.3 | 291,383 | 3.1 | 376,753 | 5.0 | 513,747 | 10.4 | 612,476 | 28.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: Undisbursed loan proceeds
|
17,948 | 0.2 | 8,453 | 0.1 | 3,298 | 0.0 | 6,316 | 0.1 | 14,174 | 0.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total mortgage loans
|
236,223 | 2.1 | 282,930 | 3.0 | 373,455 | 5.0 | 507,431 | 10.3 | 598,302 | 27.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans
|
124,431 | 1.1 | 97,216 | 1.0 | 85,312 | 1.1 | 107,586 | 2.1 | 66,927 | 3.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans
|
$ | 11,138,483 | 100.0 | % | $ | 9,443,901 | 100.0 | % | $ | 7,551,726 | 100.0 | % | $ | 4,924,334 | 100.0 | % | $ | 2,181,898 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
There were no consumer loans serviced for the benefit of others at December 31, 2003 compared with $525 million and $1.2 billion at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
42
Mortgage Loan Portfolio
We have from time to time originated mortgage products that we have held on our balance sheet rather than selling through the secondary markets. Other than mortgage loans originated through the commercial banking division on a limited basis, we do not expect to add mortgage loans to our balance sheet.
Commercial Loan Portfolio
We had outstanding commercial loan commitments of $225 million at December 31, 2003 compared with $199 million at December 31, 2002. We originated $407 million and $354 million of commercial loans for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Though we continue to focus on expanding our commercial banking operation, it is not a significant source of revenue.
Amounts Due From Trusts
The excess cash flows generated by contracts sold to each of the securitization trusts are deposited into spread accounts in the name of the trustee under the terms of the securitizations. In addition, at the time a securitization closes, we advance additional monies to our subsidiary that originated the securitization trust to initially fund these spread accounts. As these spread accounts reach the balances required by the trust, excess amounts are released to us and are used to pay down these amounts. The amounts due from trusts represent initial advances made to spread accounts and excess cash flows that were still under obligation to be held in the spread accounts for securitizations treated as sales. There were no amounts due from trusts at December 31, 2003 compared with $101 million at December 31, 2002. The decrease is the result of us regaining control over the assets of the trust for all our outstanding securitizations treated as sales for accounting purposes.
Retained Interest in Securitized Assets |
None of our securitization transactions in 2003, 2002 or 2001 were treated as sales. Therefore, we did not record any retained interest in securitized assets.
The following table sets forth the components of the RISA:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period
|
$ | $ | 37,392 | $ | 111,558 | |||||||
Additions
|
||||||||||||
Amortization
|
(36,461 | ) | (75,546 | ) | ||||||||
Change in unrealized gain/loss on RISA(1)
|
(931 | ) | 1,380 | |||||||||
Balance at end of period(2)
|
$ | $ | 0 | $ | 37,392 | |||||||
(1) | The change in unrealized gain/loss on RISA represents temporary changes in valuation including changes in the discount rate based on the current interest rate environment. Such amounts will not be realized unless the RISA is sold. Changes in prepayment and credit loss assumptions for the RISA are other than temporary in nature and impact the value of the RISA. Such other than temporary differences are immediately recognized in income as a component of retained interest income or expense. |
(2) | There were no restrictions on the RISA. |
The balance of contracts 30 days or more delinquent included in such securitization trusts totaled $35.2 million at December 31, 2002. Net chargeoffs for these securitization trusts totaled $30.4 million and $50.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
43
Asset Quality
Overview
Nonperforming assets, repossessions, loan delinquency and credit losses are considered by us as key measures of asset quality. Asset quality, in turn, affects our determination of the allowance for credit losses. We also take into consideration general economic conditions in the markets we serve, individual loan reviews, and the level of assets relative to reserves in determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses.
Automobile Contract Quality
We provide financing in a market where there is a risk of default by borrowers. Chargeoffs directly impact our earnings and cash flows. To minimize the amount of credit losses we incur, we monitor delinquent accounts, promptly repossess and remarket vehicles, and seek to collect on deficiency balances. See Business Operations.
We calculate delinquency based on the contractual due date. The following table sets forth information with respect to the delinquency of our portfolio of automobile contracts managed, which includes contracts that are owned by us and contracts that were sold but are managed by us:
December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Percentage | Amount | Percentage | Amount | Percentage | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automobile contracts managed
|
$ | 10,596,665 | $ | 9,389,974 | $ | 8,152,882 | |||||||||||||||||||
Period of delinquency:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
30-59 days
|
$ | 219,937 | 2.08 | % | $ | 238,204 | 2.54 | % | $ | 217,873 | 2.67 | % | |||||||||||||
60 days or more
|
87,129 | 0.82 | 90,291 | 0.96 | 85,290 | 1.05 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total contracts delinquent and delinquencies as a
percentage of contracts managed(1)
|
$ | 307,066 | 2.90 | % | $ | 328,495 | 3.50 | % | $ | 303,163 | 3.72 | % | |||||||||||||
(1) | Excludes Chapter 13 bankruptcy accounts greater than 120 days past due of $45.6 million and $41.5 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. |
The following table sets forth information with respect to repossessions in our portfolio of automobile contracts managed:
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Number of | Number of | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Contracts | Amount | Contracts | Amount | Contracts | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automobile contracts managed
|
862,122 | $ | 10,596,665 | 757,269 | $ | 9,389,974 | 690,401 | $ | 8,152,882 | |||||||||||||||
Repossessed vehicles
|
1,522 | $ | 10,331 | 2,375 | $ | 16,433 | 1,168 | $ | 7,553 | |||||||||||||||
Repossessed assets as a percentage of number and
amount of contracts outstanding
|
0.18% | 0.10% | 0.31% | 0.18% | 0.17% | 0.09% |
44
The following table sets forth information with respect to actual credit loss experience on our portfolio of a contracts managed:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Automobile contracts managed at end of period
|
$ | 10,596,665 | $ | 9,389,974 | $ | 8,152,882 | ||||||
Average contracts managed during period
|
$ | 10,051,754 | $ | 8,845,635 | $ | 7,576,681 | ||||||
Gross chargeoffs
|
$ | 350,714 | $ | 327,161 | $ | 236,834 | ||||||
Recoveries
|
89,027 | 82,372 | 64,626 | |||||||||
Net chargeoffs
|
$ | 261,687 | $ | 244,789 | $ | 172,208 | ||||||
Net chargeoffs as a percentage of average
automobile contracts managed during period
|
2.60 | % | 2.77 | % | 2.27 | % | ||||||
The decrease in delinquency and credit loss experience for 2003 compared to 2002 was primarily a result of our originating a higher percentage of prime credit quality contracts and some stabilization of wholesale pre-owned car prices. The increase in credit loss experience for 2002 compared to 2001 was a result of a slowing economy.
45
Cumulative static pool losses are another means of analyzing contract quality. The cumulative static pool loss of a securitization is the cumulative amount of losses actually recognized, net of recoveries, as to the contracts securitized, up to and including a given month, divided by the original principal balance of the contracts in that securitization. The following table sets forth the cumulative static pool loss ratios by month for all outstanding securitized pools:
Cumulative Static Pool Loss Curves
Period(1) | 1999-B | 2000-A | 2000-B | 2000-C | 2000-D | 2001-A | 2001-B | 2001-C | 2002-1 | 2002-2 | 2002-3 | 2002-4 | 2003-1 | 2003-2 | 2003-3 | 2003-4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 0.04 | % | 0.03 | % | 0.02 | % | 0.04 | % | 0.04 | % | 0.03 | % | 0.03 | % | 0.04 | % | 0.01 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.02 | % | 0.02 | % | 0.01 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.01 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 0.11 | % | 0.10 | % | 0.09 | % | 0.13 | % | 0.11 | % | 0.09 | % | 0.10 | % | 0.09 | % | 0.06 | % | 0.03 | % | 0.06 | % | 0.07 | % | 0.04 | % | 0.02 | % | 0.02 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 0.26 | % | 0.20 | % | 0.24 | % | 0.27 | % | 0.24 | % | 0.20 | % | 0.21 | % | 0.20 | % | 0.15 | % | 0.10 | % | 0.14 | % | 0.16 | % | 0.11 | % | 0.06 | % | 0.06 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 0.47 | % | 0.36 | % | 0.39 | % | 0.46 | % | 0.39 | % | 0.33 | % | 0.33 | % | 0.35 | % | 0.29 | % | 0.18 | % | 0.27 | % | 0.26 | % | 0.18 | % | 0.14 | % | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 0.66 | % | 0.55 | % | 0.59 | % | 0.65 | % | 0.54 | % | 0.50 | % | 0.50 | % | 0.49 | % | 0.43 | % | 0.32 | % | 0.44 | % | 0.38 | % | 0.29 | % | 0.25 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 0.87 | % | 0.71 | % | 0.78 | % | 0.81 | % | 0.74 | % | 0.70 | % | 0.69 | % | 0.65 | % | 0.60 | % | 0.49 | % | 0.57 | % | 0.50 | % | 0.41 | % | 0.36 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | 1.00 | % | 0.91 | % | 0.99 | % | 0.93 | % | 0.93 | % | 0.84 | % | 0.87 | % | 0.81 | % | 0.84 | % | 0.66 | % | 0.70 | % | 0.61 | % | 0.53 | % | 0.48 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 1.13 | % | 1.10 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.07 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.04 | % | 1.05 | % | 0.95 | % | 1.06 | % | 0.82 | % | 0.82 | % | 0.78 | % | 0.66 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | 1.24 | % | 1.27 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.24 | % | 1.34 | % | 1.24 | % | 1.22 | % | 1.07 | % | 1.28 | % | 0.96 | % | 0.96 | % | 0.94 | % | 0.80 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | 1.35 | % | 1.45 | % | 1.44 | % | 1.41 | % | 1.50 | % | 1.45 | % | 1.36 | % | 1.20 | % | 1.48 | % | 1.10 | % | 1.10 | % | 1.08 | % | 0.93 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | 1.44 | % | 1.58 | % | 1.57 | % | 1.62 | % | 1.74 | % | 1.67 | % | 1.53 | % | 1.37 | % | 1.67 | % | 1.26 | % | 1.24 | % | 1.28 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | 1.58 | % | 1.73 | % | 1.72 | % | 1.86 | % | 1.95 | % | 1.90 | % | 1.67 | % | 1.55 | % | 1.82 | % | 1.39 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.43 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | 1.74 | % | 1.85 | % | 1.86 | % | 2.04 | % | 2.21 | % | 2.09 | % | 1.81 | % | 1.74 | % | 1.99 | % | 1.51 | % | 1.53 | % | 1.59 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | 1.85 | % | 2.00 | % | 2.04 | % | 2.25 | % | 2.48 | % | 2.25 | % | 2.00 | % | 1.97 | % | 2.14 | % | 1.68 | % | 1.70 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | 2.03 | % | 2.15 | % | 2.24 | % | 2.45 | % | 2.71 | % | 2.41 | % | 2.19 | % | 2.16 | % | 2.27 | % | 1.83 | % | 1.88 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | 2.16 | % | 2.37 | % | 2.39 | % | 2.68 | % | 2.89 | % | 2.54 | % | 2.37 | % | 2.36 | % | 2.45 | % | 1.99 | % | 2.03 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | 2.30 | % | 2.52 | % | 2.55 | % | 2.88 | % | 3.08 | % | 2.73 | % | 2.60 | % | 2.59 | % | 2.62 | % | 2.16 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | 2.42 | % | 2.67 | % | 2.73 | % | 3.08 | % | 3.22 | % | 2.93 | % | 2.80 | % | 2.78 | % | 2.80 | % | 2.31 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | 2.50 | % | 2.83 | % | 2.93 | % | 3.23 | % | 3.40 | % | 3.11 | % | 3.01 | % | 2.95 | % | 2.99 | % | 2.46 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | 2.58 | % | 2.99 | % | 3.12 | % | 3.38 | % | 3.59 | % | 3.34 | % | 3.19 | % | 3.14 | % | 3.15 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | 2.67 | % | 3.16 | % | 3.27 | % | 3.54 | % | 3.78 | % | 3.54 | % | 3.34 | % | 3.29 | % | 3.31 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | 2.77 | % | 3.34 | % | 3.38 | % | 3.67 | % | 3.96 | % | 3.72 | % | 3.49 | % | 3.41 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | 2.87 | % | 3.49 | % | 3.52 | % | 3.83 | % | 4.18 | % | 3.92 | % | 3.62 | % | 3.57 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | 3.01 | % | 3.63 | % | 3.63 | % | 4.00 | % | 4.41 | % | 4.10 | % | 3.75 | % | 3.73 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | 3.14 | % | 3.75 | % | 3.73 | % | 4.16 | % | 4.58 | % | 4.23 | % | 3.87 | % | 3.88 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
27 | 3.16 | % | 3.86 | % | 3.84 | % | 4.35 | % | 4.79 | % | 4.36 | % | 4.00 | % | 4.04 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
28 | 3.29 | % | 3.97 | % | 3.97 | % | 4.50 | % | 4.96 | % | 4.47 | % | 4.15 | % | 4.20 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 | 3.40 | % | 4.09 | % | 4.11 | % | 4.64 | % | 5.08 | % | 4.56 | % | 4.28 | % | 4.35 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 | 3.50 | % | 4.21 | % | 4.26 | % | 4.79 | % | 5.22 | % | 4.67 | % | 4.40 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31 | 3.61 | % | 4.33 | % | 4.40 | % | 4.92 | % | 5.34 | % | 4.81 | % | 4.52 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
32 | 3.68 | % | 4.47 | % | 4.50 | % | 5.02 | % | 5.44 | % | 4.92 | % | 4.64 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
33 | 3.74 | % | 4.59 | % | 4.61 | % | 5.12 | % | 5.54 | % | 5.04 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34 | 3.81 | % | 4.68 | % | 4.70 | % | 5.22 | % | 5.66 | % | 5.13 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
35 | 3.87 | % | 4.79 | % | 4.78 | % | 5.29 | % | 5.76 | % | 5.24 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
36 | 3.91 | % | 4.86 | % | 4.85 | % | 5.38 | % | 5.86 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
37 | 3.97 | % | 4.93 | % | 4.94 | % | 5.47 | % | 5.97 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
38 | 4.03 | % | 5.01 | % | 4.99 | % | 5.53 | % | 6.04 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
39 | 4.09 | % | 5.08 | % | 5.05 | % | 5.62 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
40 | 4.13 | % | 5.13 | % | 5.12 | % | 5.68 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
41 | 4.18 | % | 5.18 | % | 5.18 | % | 5.75 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
42 | 4.23 | % | 5.24 | % | 5.23 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
43 | 4.28 | % | 5.29 | % | 5.27 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
44 | 4.33 | % | 5.34 | % | 5.31 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
45 | 4.35 | % | 5.37 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
46 | 4.38 | % | 5.42 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
47 | 4.39 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
48 | 4.41 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
49 | 4.43 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
50 | 4.44 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
51 | 4.46 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
52 | 4.48 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
53 | 4.49 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
54 | 4.50 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime Mix(2) | 70 | % | 68 | % | 69 | % | 68 | % | 68 | % | 71 | % | 71 | % | 76 | % | 70 | % | 87 | % | 85 | % | 80 | % | 80 | % | 82 | % | 84 | % | 82 | % |
(1) | Represents the number of months since the inception of the securitization. |
(2) | Represents the original percentage of prime automobile contracts securitized within each pool. |
46
Real Estate Loan Quality
Our mortgage delinquencies over 60 days include both single family and multi-family mortgages. We had 1.25% of total mortgage loans past due over 60 days at December 31, 2003 compared with 1.32% at December 31, 2002.
Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming loans, also known as NPLs, are defined as all nonaccrual loans. This includes mortgage loans 90 days or more past due, impaired loans where full collection of principal and interest is not reasonably assured and Chapter 13 bankruptcy accounts contractually past due over 120 days. For those accounts that are in Chapter 13 bankruptcy that are contractually past due over 120 days, all accrued interest is reversed and income is recognized on a cash basis. When a loan is designated as nonaccrual, all previously accrued but unpaid interest is reversed. For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, interest on NPLs excluded from interest income was $3.3 million, $3.5 million and $3.1 million, respectively.
Nonperforming assets, also known as NPAs, consist of NPLs, repossessed automobiles, and real estate owned, also known as REO. Repossessed automobiles are carried at fair value. REO is carried at lower of cost or fair value. NPAs were $63.6 million at December 31, 2003 compared with $54.9 million at December 31, 2002. NPAs represented 0.4% of total assets at both December 31, 2003 and 2002. There were no impaired loans at December 31, 2003 or 2002.
Allowance For Credit Losses
Our allowance for credit losses was $302 million at December 31, 2003 compared with $269 million at December 31, 2002. We have decreased our percentage of allowance for credit losses from 2.9% at December 31, 2002 to 2.7% at December 31, 2003 as we have experienced lower losses in our loan portfolio due to our originating a higher percentage of prime credit quality contracts and improvement in the economy. Based on the analysis we performed related to the allowance for credit losses as described under Critical Accounting Policies, we believe that our allowance for credit losses is currently adequate to cover probable losses in our loan portfolio that can be reasonable estimated.
47
The following table sets forth the activity in the allowance for credit losses:
For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period
|
$ | 269,352 | $ | 178,218 | $ | 104,006 | $ | 64,217 | $ | 37,660 | |||||||||||
Chargeoffs:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans
|
(350,718 | ) | (280,378 | ) | (162,878 | ) | (55,892 | ) | (20,052 | ) | |||||||||||
Commercial loans
|
(511 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans
|
(352 | ) | (260 | ) | (1,024 | ) | (1,234 | ) | (1,230 | ) | |||||||||||
(351,070 | ) | (281,149 | ) | (163,902 | ) | (57,126 | ) | (21,282 | ) | ||||||||||||
Recoveries:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans
|
89,196 | 66,050 | 41,120 | 14,731 | 7,592 | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans
|
78 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans
|
40 | 17 | 51 | 1,847 | |||||||||||||||||
89,314 | 66,050 | 41,137 | 14,782 | 9,439 | |||||||||||||||||
Net chargeoffs
|
(261,756 | ) | (215,099 | ) | (122,765 | ) | (42,344 | ) | (11,843 | ) | |||||||||||
Provision for credit losses
|
294,006 | 306,233 | 196,977 | 82,133 | 38,400 | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at end of period
|
$ | 301,602 | $ | 269,352 | $ | 178,218 | $ | 104,006 | $ | 64,217 | |||||||||||
Ratio of net chargeoffs during the period to
average loans owned during the period
|
2.5 | % | 2.6 | % | 2.0 | % | 1.3 | % | 0.7 | % | |||||||||||
Ratio of allowance for credit losses to loans at
the end of the period
|
2.7 | % | 2.9 | % | 2.4 | % | 2.1 | % | 2.9 | % |
48
The allowance for credit losses by loan category was as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans in | Loans in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Each | Each | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Category | Category | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
as a % of | Allowance | as a % of | Allowance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | as a % of | Loan | Total | as a % of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan Balance | Loans | Allowance | Loans | Balance | Loans | Allowance | Loans | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans
|
$ | 10,777,829 | 96.8 | % | $ | 297,058 | 2.8 | % | $ | 9,063,755 | 96.0 | % | $ | 260,634 | 2.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Single family residential
|
61,628 | 0.6 | 1,477 | 2.4 | 98,635 | 1.0 | 3,924 | 4.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Multifamily residential
|
169,473 | 1.5 | 1,065 | 0.6 | 178,598 | 1.9 | 2,392 | 1.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction loans
|
5,122 | 0.0 | 260 | 5.1 | 5,697 | 0.1 | 133 | 2.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans
|
124,431 | 1.1 | 1,742 | 1.4 | 97,216 | 1.0 | 2,269 | 2.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 11,138,483 | 100.0 | % | $ | 301,602 | 2.7 | % | $ | 9,443,901 | 100.0 | % | $ | 269,352 | 2.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans in | Loans in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Each | Each | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Category | Category | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
as a % of | Allowance | as a % of | Allowance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | as a % of | Loan | Total | as a % of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan Balance | Loans | Allowance | Loans | Balance | Loans | Allowance | Loans | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans
|
$ | 7,092,959 | 94.0 | % | $ | 167,659 | 2.4 | % | $ | 4,309,317 | 87.5 | % | $ | 83,687 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Single family residential
|
151,540 | 2.0 | 4,432 | 2.9 | 230,854 | 4.7 | 9,020 | 3.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Multifamily residential
|
209,575 | 2.8 | 3,257 | 1.6 | 268,109 | 5.4 | 7,909 | 2.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction loans
|
12,340 | 0.1 | 153 | 1.2 | 8,468 | 0.2 | 139 | 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans
|
85,312 | 1.1 | 2,717 | 3.2 | 107,586 | 2.2 | 3,251 | 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 7,551,726 | 100.0 | % | $ | 178,218 | 2.4 | % | $ | 4,924,334 | 100.0 | % | $ | 104,006 | 2.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||
December 31, 1999 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans in | ||||||||||||||||
Each | ||||||||||||||||
Category as | Allowance | |||||||||||||||
a % of | as a % of | |||||||||||||||
Loan Balance | Total Loans | Allowance | Loans | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans held for sale
|
$ | 1,432,644 | 65.7 | % | $ | 31,936 | 2.2 | % | ||||||||
Consumer loans
|
84,025 | 3.8 | 8,715 | 10.4 | ||||||||||||
Single family residential
|
285,203 | 13.1 | 7,344 | 2.6 | ||||||||||||
Multifamily residential
|
304,083 | 13.9 | 14,334 | 4.7 | ||||||||||||
Construction loans
|
9,016 | 0.4 | 195 | 2.2 | ||||||||||||
Commercial loans
|
66,927 | 3.1 | 1,693 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||
$ | 2,181,898 | 100.0 | % | $ | 64,217 | 2.9 | % | |||||||||
49
The following table presents summarized data relative to the allowances for credit and real estate owned losses at the dates indicated:
At December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans(1)
|
$ | 11,138,483 | $ | 9,433,901 | $ | 7,551,726 | $ | 4,924,334 | $ | 2,181,898 | |||||||||||
Allowance for credit losses
|
301,602 | 269,352 | 178,218 | 104,006 | 64,217 | ||||||||||||||||
Allowance for real estate owned losses
|
100 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 784 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans past due 60 days or more(2)
|
91,381 | 86,199 | 74,851 | 37,911 | 17,514 | ||||||||||||||||
Nonperforming loans(3)
|
53,026 | 39,231 | 25,347 | 9,413 | 11,279 | ||||||||||||||||
Nonperforming assets(4)
|
63,600 | 54,923 | 35,127 | 14,684 | 13,250 | ||||||||||||||||
Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans
|
2.7 | % | 2.9 | % | 2.4 | % | 2.1 | % | 2.9 | % | |||||||||||
Loans past due 60 days or more
|
330.0 | % | 312.5 | % | 238.1 | % | 274.3 | % | 366.7 | % | |||||||||||
Nonperforming loans
|
568.8 | % | 686.6 | % | 703.1 | % | 1,104.9 | % | 569.4 | % | |||||||||||
Total allowance for credit losses and REO losses
as a percentage of nonperforming assets
|
474.4 | % | 490.9 | % | 508.1 | % | 710.0 | % | 490.6 | % | |||||||||||
Nonperforming loans as a percentage of total loans
|
0.5 | % | 0.4 | % | 0.3 | % | 0.2 | % | 0.5 | % | |||||||||||
Nonperforming assets as a percentage of total
assets
|
0.4 | % | 0.4 | % | 0.3 | % | 0.2 | % | 0.3 | % |
(1) | Loans net of unearned interest and undisbursed loan proceeds. |
(2) | Excludes Chapter 13 bankruptcy accounts greater than 120 days past due. |
(3) | All nonperforming loans are on nonaccrual. |
(4) | Repossessed automobiles and real estate owned, net of allowance. |
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Overview
We require substantial capital resources and cash to support our business. Our ability to maintain positive cash flows from operations is the result of our consistent managed growth, favorable loss experience and efficient operations.
Principal Sources of Cash
We employ various sources to fund our operations, including collections of principal and interest from loans, deposits, securitizations, commercial paper, advances from the FHLB, repurchase agreements, subordinated debentures and other borrowings. The sources used vary depending on such factors as rates paid, maturities, and the impact on capital.
Automobile Contract Sales and Securitizations
Our primary source of funds is the ability to aggregate and securitize contracts in the form of asset-backed securities. These transactions generate cash proceeds that allow us to repay amounts borrowed and to purchase additional contracts. Since 1985, we have securitized over $36.0 billion of automobile contracts in 62 public offerings, making us the fourth largest issuer by dollar amount of such securities in the nation.
50
Collections of Principal and Interest from Loans and MBS and Release of Cash from Spread Accounts
The collection of principal and interest from contracts originated and securitized and the release of cash from spread accounts is another significant source of funds for us. Collections of principal and interest are deposited into collection accounts established in connection with each securitization or into our accounts for non-securitized contracts. Pursuant to reinvestment contracts entered into in connection with securitizations guaranteed under a financial guarantee insurance policy issued by FSA, we receive access to the amounts deposited into collection accounts and amounts held in the spread accounts for these securitizations. We use those amounts so received in our daily operations to fund the purchase of contracts or to cover the day to day costs of operations. If delinquency or chargeoff rates in a securitization exceed established triggers, amounts required to be held in spread accounts will increase, requiring us to pledge additional collateral. We may bear additional expense due to an increase in required collateral. If the reinvestment contracts were no longer deemed an eligible investment, which determination would be made by the rating agencies or FSA, we would no longer have the ability to use this cash in the ordinary course of business and would need to obtain alternative financing, which may only be available on less attractive terms. See Business Transactions with Related Parties Reinvestment Contracts. If we were unable to obtain additional financing, we may have to curtail our contract purchasing activities, which would also have a material adverse effect on our financial position, liquidity and results of operations. Also, a significant increase in credit losses could have a material adverse impact on our collections of principal and interest from contracts.
Pursuant to the securitization agreements for our securitizations that are credit enhanced through the issuance of subordinated notes, we receive cash released from the trustee from the spread accounts on such transactions once the spread accounts reach predetermined funding levels. The amounts released from these spread accounts represent the return of the initial deposits to such accounts as well as the release of excess spread on the securitized contracts.
For real estate loans and MBS, principal and interest are deposited into our own accounts and such amounts are also used in our daily operations.
Total principal and interest collections on MBS, loans owned by us and loans securitized under a financial guarantee insurance policy issued by FSA and release of cash from spread accounts on securitizations that are credit enhanced through the issuance of subordinated notes totaled $6.4 billion, $7.2 billion and $5.9 billion for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The increase in principal and interest collections is due to an increase in the amount of contracts managed and MBS held by us.
Deposits
We attract both short-term and long-term deposits from the general public, commercial enterprises and institutions by offering a variety of accounts and rates. We offer regular passbook accounts, demand deposit accounts, money market accounts, certificate of deposit accounts and individual retirement accounts. Our retail banking division gathers deposits from 20 retail branch locations throughout Southern California. Our commercial banking division gathers deposits by establishing commercial relationships with businesses located throughout Southern California.
51
The following table sets forth the amount of our deposits by type at the dates indicated:
December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
No minimum term:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposit accounts
|
$ | 1,145 | $ | 1,037 | $ | 1,124 | $ | 8,229 | $ | 60,365 | |||||||||||
Passbook accounts
|
7,282 | 6,688 | 11,192 | 11,768 | 13,789 | ||||||||||||||||
Money market accounts
|
963,004 | 730,245 | 858,371 | 810,169 | 574,589 | ||||||||||||||||
Noninterest bearing deposits
|
210,405 | 165,844 | 100,170 | 67,984 | 47,770 | ||||||||||||||||
Certificate accounts:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Certificates (30 days to five years)
|
646,868 | 878,096 | 1,154,917 | 1,414,956 | 1,311,916 | ||||||||||||||||
Individual retirement accounts
|
81,701 | 94,082 | 147,250 | 165,381 | 175,286 | ||||||||||||||||
Brokered deposits
|
62,451 | 98,992 | 56,302 | 28,594 | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 1,972,856 | $ | 1,974,984 | $ | 2,329,326 | $ | 2,478,487 | $ | 2,212,309 | ||||||||||||
The variety of deposits we offer has allowed us to remain competitive in obtaining funds and provided us the flexibility to respond to changes in customer demand and competitive pressures. Generally, as other financial institutions, we have become more subject to short-term fluctuations in deposit flows as customers have become more interest rate conscious. Our ability to attract and maintain deposits and control our cost of funds has been and will continue to be significantly affected by market conditions.
The following table summarizes our average certificate and money market accounts outstanding:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Average certificate accounts outstanding
|
$ | 783,720 | $ | 1,154,090 | $ | 1,382,426 | ||||||
Average interest rate paid on certificate accounts
|
2.63 | % | 3.58 | % | 5.84 | % | ||||||
Average money market accounts outstanding
|
$ | 855,460 | $ | 748,814 | $ | 750,924 | ||||||
Average interest rate paid on money market
accounts
|
1.33 | % | 1.97 | % | 3.82 | % |
Deposit accounts, subject to certain FDIC attribution rules, are insured by the FDIC up to $100,000 per customer. Our maturities of certificate accounts greater than or equal to $100,000 were as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Three months or less
|
$ | 2,449 | $ | 1,970 | ||||
Over three months through six months
|
1,497 | 2,129 | ||||||
Over six months through one year
|
186,647 | 180,374 | ||||||
Over one year through three years
|
27,458 | 119,083 | ||||||
Over three years
|
1,844 | 1,726 | ||||||
$ | 219,895 | $ | 305,282 | |||||
52
Borrowings and Other Sources of Funds
Our other sources of funds include commercial paper, advances from the FHLB, sales of securities under agreements to repurchase, other borrowings and cash generated from operations. We select from among these funding alternatives based on the timing and duration of our cash needs, as well as the costs, maturities and other requirements of each funding source.
The FHLB system functions in a reserve capacity for savings institutions. As a member, we are required to own capital stock in the FHLB and are authorized to apply for advances from the FHLB on security of such stock and on certain residential mortgage loans. The Bank has been pre-approved for advances up to 25% of its assets, based on remaining availability under credit facilities established by the Bank with the FHLB, with 24 hours notice. Such borrowings may be made pursuant to several different programs offered from time to time by the FHLB. Additional funds are available subject to additional collateral and other requirements. Each credit program has its own interest rate, which may be fixed or variable, and range of maturities. The FHLB prescribes the acceptable uses to which advances pursuant to each program may be put, as well as limitations on the sizes of advances and repayment provisions.
Federal regulations have been promulgated which connect CRA performance with access to long-term advances from the FHLB to member institutions. The Bank received a satisfactory rating in its most recent CRA evaluation concluded in July 2003.
Subordinated Capital Debentures
In 1993, the Bank issued $125 million of 8.5% subordinated capital debentures due in 2003. The Bank redeemed these subordinated debentures in July 2001. In 1998 and 2002, the Bank issued $150 million of 8.875% and $300 million of 9.625% subordinated capital debentures due in 2007 and 2012, respectively. At December 31, 2003, $101 million and $300 million were outstanding on the subordinated debentures due in 2007 and 2012, respectively, excluding discounts and issue costs. The subordinated debentures are redeemable at our option, in whole or in part, on or after August 1, 2004 and May 15, 2009, respectively, both at 100% of the principal amount being redeemed plus accrued interest as of the date of redemption. In addition to providing additional liquidity, the Bank is permitted to include $355 million of these debentures in supplementary capital for purposes of determining compliance with risk-based capital requirements. The Banks subordinated debentures are included in supplementary capital for regulatory purposes. The amount of the 8.875% debentures that may be included as supplementary capital began to decrease at the rate of 20% of the amount originally outstanding per year, net of redemptions, on August 1, 2002. The 9.625% debentures will not begin to be phased out as supplementary capital until May 15, 2007. See Business Supervision and Regulation Capital Requirements.
Conduit Financing
We have previously entered into secured conduit financing transactions using an automobile receivable securitization structure for short-term financing needs. For the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, we issued $775 million and $650 million of notes secured by contracts through conduit facilities established in January 2002 and December 2001, respectively. We terminated the December 2001 facility in March 2002 in conjunction with a $1.8 billion public asset-backed securitization. The January 2002 facility was terminated in May 2002 in conjunction with a $1.8 billion public asset-backed securitization. We did not enter into a secured conduit financing in 2003.
Equity Offerings
We completed common stock offerings in July 2003 and November 2003 in which we raised a total of $163 million and $207 million through the issuance of 6.1 million and 6.3 million additional common shares at a price of $28.00 and $34.39 per share, respectively. With the completion of these offerings, our total number of common shares issued and outstanding increased 31.6% to 51.7 million shares at December 31, 2003.
53
We completed rights offerings in March 2002 and May 2001 in which we raised $51.3 million and $61.0 million through the issuance of 3.3 million and 3.7 million additional common shares at a price of $15.75 and $16.25 per share, respectively. With the completion of the March 2002 offering, our total number of common shares issued and outstanding increased 9.1% to 39.1 million shares at March 31, 2002, compared with an increase of 12% to 35.7 million shares in May 2001.
WFS completed rights offerings in March 2002 and May 2001 that raised a total of $110 million and $116 million through the issuance of 6.1 million and 6.4 million additional common shares at a price of $18.00 and $18.25 per share, respectively. With the completion of the March 2002 offering, the number of WFS common shares issued and outstanding increased by 18% to 41.1 million shares, compared with an increase of 22% to 35.0 million shares in May 2001.
Of the 6.1 million and 6.4 million additional common shares issued by WFS in 2002 and 2001, the Bank purchased 5.2 million and 5.3 million shares in the amount of $94.4 million and $96.5 million, respectively. The net amount of proceeds received from WFS and our rights offerings executed in March 2002 and May 2001 totaled $67.3 million and $80.6 million, respectively. At December 31, 2003, the Bank owned 84% of WFS common stock.
Principal Uses of Cash
Acquisition of Loans and Investment Securities
Our most significant use of cash is for the acquisition of contracts, MBS and other investment securities. Loan originations totaled $6.4 billion during 2003 compared with $5.8 billion and $5.2 billion in 2002 and 2001, respectively. We purchased $2.2 billion of MBS and other investment securities during 2003 compared with $1.6 billion and $1.2 billion during 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Payments of Principal and Interest on Securitizations
Under the terms of our reinvestment contract on securitizations guaranteed under a financial guarantee insurance policy issued by FSA, we fund quarterly payments of interest and principal to these security holders derived from the cash flows received on the securitized contracts that we service. Payments of principal and interest to security holders totaled $3.8 billion in 2003 compared with $5.6 billion and $3.7 billion in 2002 and 2001, respectively. Payments of principal and interest in 2002 include $1.5 billion of payments on conduit financings.
Amounts Paid to Dealers
Consistent with industry practice, we generally pay dealer participation to the originating dealer for each contract purchased. Participation paid to dealers during 2003 totaled $141 million compared with $129 million and $120 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively. Typically, the acquisition of contracts higher up the prime credit quality spectrum requires a higher amount of participation paid to the dealers due to increased level of competition for such contracts. The amount of participation paid to dealers increased primarily as a result of an increase in the amount of contracts purchased.
Advances to Spread Accounts
At the time a securitization transaction closes, we are required to advance monies to initially fund the spread account. On senior/ subordinated securitizations, the spread account balance is invested in eligible mutual fund investments by the trustee. The advanced monies are included in restricted cash on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. The amount of such initial advances included in restricted cash was $21.7 million at December 31, 2003 compared with $12.5 million at December 31, 2002.
Operating Our Business
Our largest operating expenditure is salaries and benefits paid to our associates. Other expenditures include occupancy, collection, repossession, telephone and data processing costs. We also use substantial
54
Contractual Obligations
The following table lists our contractual obligations:
At December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
More than | More than | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
One Year | Three Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
One Year | through | through | More than | No Stated | |||||||||||||||||||||
or Less | Three Years | Five years | Five Years | Maturity | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Certificate of deposits
|
$ | 694,837 | $ | 30,097 | $ | 3,635 | $ | 728,569 | |||||||||||||||||
Notes payable on automobile secured financing(1)
|
429,446 | 1,670,993 | 4,478,079 | $ | 3,676,123 | 10,254,641 | |||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase(1)
|
222,489 | 222,489 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
326,000 | 2,644 | 328,644 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated debentures
|
99,326 | 295,528 | 394,854 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings
|
9,046 | 9,046 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan commitments
|
222,921 | 1,790 | 39 | 4 | $ | 1,959 | 226,713 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases
|
6,917 | 10,298 | 5,867 | 4,807 | 27,889 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations
|
$ | 1,911,656 | $ | 1,713,178 | $ | 4,586,946 | $ | 3,979,106 | $ | 1,959 | $ | 12,192,845 | |||||||||||||
(1) | Includes the effects of hedging activities. |
Capital Requirements
The Bank is subject to certain minimum capital requirements imposed by FIRREA and FDICIA. See Business Supervision and Regulation Capital Requirements. The Bank currently meets all of the requirements of a well capitalized financial institution.
55
The following table summarizes the Banks actual capital and required capital as of December 31, 2003 and 2002:
Tier 1 | |||||||||||||||||
Tangible | Core | Risk-Based | Risk-Based | ||||||||||||||
Capital | Capital | Capital | Capital | ||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2003
|
|||||||||||||||||
Actual capital:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
$ | 884,536 | $ | 884,536 | $ | 881,517 | $ | 1,357,744 | |||||||||
Capital ratio
|
7.06 | % | 7.06 | % | 9.20 | % | 14.17 | % | |||||||||
FIRREA minimum required capital:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
$ | 187,923 | $ | 375,845 | N/A | $ | 766,665 | ||||||||||
Capital ratio
|
1.50 | % | 3.00 | % | N/A | 8.00 | % | ||||||||||
Excess
|
$ | 696,613 | $ | 508,691 | N/A | $ | 591,079 | ||||||||||
FDICIA well capitalized required capital:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
N/A | $ | 626,409 | $ | 574,999 | $ | 958,332 | ||||||||||
Capital ratio
|
N/A | 5.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||
Excess
|
N/A | $ | 258,127 | $ | 306,518 | $ | 399,412 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2002
|
|||||||||||||||||
Actual capital:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
$ | 728,631 | $ | 728,631 | $ | 655,142 | $ | 1,143,345 | |||||||||
Capital ratio
|
6.43 | % | 6.43 | % | 7.67 | % | 13.38 | % | |||||||||
FIRREA minimum required capital:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
$ | 169,991 | $ | 339,981 | N/A | $ | 683,481 | ||||||||||
Capital ratio
|
1.50 | % | 3.00 | % | N/A | 8.00 | % | ||||||||||
Excess
|
$ | 558,640 | $ | 388,650 | N/A | $ | 459,864 | ||||||||||
FDICIA well capitalized required capital:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
N/A | $ | 566,635 | $ | 512,611 | $ | 854,351 | ||||||||||
Capital ratio
|
N/A | 5.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||
Excess
|
N/A | $ | 161,996 | $ | 142,531 | $ | 288,994 |
The following table reconciles the Banks capital in accordance with GAAP to the Banks tangible, core and risk-based capital:
December 31, | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||
Bank shareholders equity GAAP
basis
|
$ | 685,045 | $ | 532,902 | |||||
Add: Net unrealized losses
|
68,203 | 94,220 | |||||||
Add: Minority interest in equity of subsidiaries
|
131,434 | 101,666 | |||||||
Less: Non-permissible activities
|
(146 | ) | (157 | ) | |||||
Total tangible and core capital
|
884,536 | 728,631 | |||||||
Adjustments for risk-based capital:
|
|||||||||
Subordinated debentures(1)
|
355,370 | 380,314 | |||||||
General loan valuation allowance(2)
|
120,857 | 107,889 | |||||||
Low-level recourse deduction
|
(3,019 | ) | (73,489 | ) | |||||
Risk-based capital
|
$ | 1,357,744 | $ | 1,143,345 | |||||
(1) | Excludes capitalized discounts and issue costs. |
(2) | Limited to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. |
56
We manage the Bank to higher internal capital targets than the standards defined by FDICIA for qualification as well capitalized because, among other reasons, many of the contracts we originate possess one or more of the factors identified by the OTS as factors indicative of subprime loans. See Business Risks OTS Guidance Regarding Subprime Lending May Affect the Banks Capital Requirements. Starting in the fifth year prior to maturity, 20% per year of the principal amount of subordinated debentures outstanding can no longer be included as supplementary capital. As a result, we will need to replace that capital in order to maintain the current capital levels of the Bank. Capital can be increased through increases in retained earnings and from the issuance of equity and new subordinated debentures. In addition, the amount of capital required can be reduced through sales of assets.
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk |
Fluctuations in interest rates and early prepayment of contracts are the primary market risks facing us. Our Credit and Pricing Committee is responsible for setting credit and pricing policies and for monitoring credit quality. Our Asset/ Liability Committee is responsible for the management of interest rate and prepayment risks. Asset/ liability management is the process of measuring and controlling interest rate risk through matching the maturity and repricing characteristics of interest earning assets with those of interest bearing liabilities.
The Asset/ Liability Committee closely monitors interest rate and prepayment risks and recommends policies for managing such risks. The primary measurement tool for evaluating this risk is the use of interest rate shock analysis. This analysis simulates the effects of an instantaneous and sustained change in interest rates (in increments of 100 basis points) on our assets and liabilities and measures the resulting increase or decrease to our net portfolio value, also known as NPV. NPV is the discounted value of the future cash flows (or paths of cash flows in the presence of options based on volatility assumptions and an arbitrage free Monte Carlo simulation method to achieve the current market price) of all assets minus all liabilities whose value is affected by interest rates changes plus the book value of non-interest rate sensitive assets minus the book value of non-interest rate sensitive liabilities. It should be noted that shock analysis is objective but not entirely realistic in that it assumes an instantaneous and isolated set of events. The NPV ratio is the ratio of the NPV to the market value of our assets as calculated above. In general, an increase in interest rates would more adversely affect our NPV than would a decrease in interest rates.
The following table summarizes our NPV sensitivity analysis at December 31, 2003 based on guidance from the OTS:
Changes in Interest Rates | NPV Ratio | |||
+100 basis points
|
9.50 | % | ||
Base case
|
9.63 | % | ||
-100 basis points
|
9.91 | % |
Another important measurement of our interest rate risk is gap analysis. Gap is defined as the difference between the amount of interest sensitive assets that reprice versus the amount of interest sensitive liabilities that also reprice within a defined period of time. We have more interest sensitive liabilities rather than assets repricing in shorter term maturity buckets and more interest sensitive assets rather than liabilities repricing in longer term maturity buckets.
57
The following table summarizes our maturity gap position:
Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis at December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Within | 3 Months to | 1 Year to | 3 Years to | After | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3 Months | 1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | 5 Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest earning assets:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities
|
$ | 67,646 | $ | 50,103 | $ | 117,749 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other investments
|
577,208 | $ | 200 | 577,408 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
633,909 | 1,018,740 | 746,985 | $ | 189,813 | $ | 112,350 | 2,701,797 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total investments
|
1,278,763 | 1,018,940 | 797,088 | 189,813 | 112,350 | 3,396,954 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans(1)
|
758,797 | 2,983,401 | 5,099,017 | 1,883,438 | 53,176 | 10,777,829 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustable rate(2)
|
201,023 | 12,005 | 213,028 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate(2)
|
2,781 | 7,506 | 5,520 | 1,314 | 952 | 18,073 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Construction loans(2)
|
5,122 | 5,122 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans(2)
|
124,242 | 150 | 39 | 124,431 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest earning assets
|
2,370,728 | 4,022,002 | 5,901,664 | 2,074,565 | 166,478 | 14,535,437 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest bearing liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Passbook accounts(3)
|
760 | 2,754 | 3,768 | 7,282 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposit and money market accounts(3)
|
232,806 | 323,319 | 408,023 | 964,148 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Certificate accounts(4)
|
175,505 | 581,789 | 30,092 | 3,634 | 791,020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances(4)
|
326,000 | 2,644 | 328,644 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase(4)
|
222,489 | 222,489 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes payable on automobile secured financing(1)
|
2,938,946 | 2,678,682 | 3,714,853 | 922,160 | 10,254,641 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated debentures(4)
|
99,326 | 295,528 | 394,854 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings(4)
|
9,046 | 9,046 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest bearing liabilities
|
3,905,552 | 3,586,544 | 4,156,736 | 1,025,120 | 298,172 | 12,972,124 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Excess interest earning/ bearing assets
(liabilities)
|
(1,534,824 | ) | 435,458 | 1,744,928 | 1,049,445 | (131,694 | ) | 1,563,313 | |||||||||||||||||||
Effect of hedging activities(5)
|
2,626,895 | (565,901 | ) | (1,306,574 | ) | (309,920 | ) | (444,500 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Hedged excess (deficit)
|
$ | 1,092,071 | $ | (130,443 | ) | $ | 438,354 | $ | 739,525 | $ | (576,194 | ) | $ | 1,563,313 | |||||||||||||
Cumulative excess
|
$ | 1,092,071 | $ | 961,628 | $ | 1,399,982 | $ | 2,139,507 | $ | 1,563,313 | $ | 1,563,313 | |||||||||||||||
Cumulative difference as a percentage of total
interest earning assets
|
7.51 | % | 6.62 | % | 9.63 | % | 14.72 | % | 10.76 | % | 10.76 | % |
(1) | Based on contractual maturities adjusted by our historical prepayment rate. |
(2) | Based on interest rate repricing adjusted for projected prepayments. |
(3) | Based on assumptions established by the OTS. |
(4) | Based on contractual maturity. |
(5) | Includes effect of interest rate caps and swaps on the MBS portfolio. |
58
The contracts originated and held by us are fixed rate and, accordingly, we have exposure to changes in interest rates. To protect against potential changes in interest rates affecting interest payments on future securitization transactions, we may enter into various hedge agreements prior to closing the transaction. We enter into Euro-dollar future contracts and forward agreements in order to hedge our future interest payments on our notes payable on automobile secured financing. The market value of these hedge agreements is designed to respond inversely to changes in interest rates. Because of this inverse relationship, we can effectively lock in a gross interest rate spread at the time of entering into the hedge transaction. Gains and losses on these agreements are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Any ineffective portion is recognized in interest expense during that period if the hedge is greater than 100% effective. Upon completion of the securitization transaction, the gains or losses are recognized in full as an adjustment to the gain or loss on the sale of the contracts if the securitization transaction is treated as a sale or amortized on a level yield basis over the duration of the notes issued if the transaction is treated as a secured financing. These hedge instruments are settled daily, and therefore, there are no related financial instruments recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition. Credit risk related to these hedge instruments is minimal. As a result of our approach to interest rate risk management and our hedging strategies, we do not anticipate that changes in interest rates will materially affect our results of operations or liquidity, although we can provide no assurance in this regard.
As we issued certain variable rate notes payable in connection with our securitization activities, we also entered into interest rate swap agreements in order to hedge our variable interest rate exposure on future interest payments. The fair value of the interest rate swap agreements is included in notes payable on automobile secured financing, and any change in the fair value is reported as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Any ineffective portion is recorded in interest expense during that period if the hedge is greater than 100% effective. Related interest income or expense is settled on a quarterly basis and recognized as an adjustment to interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
We have entered into interest rate swap agreements or other derivatives that we choose not to designate as hedges or that do not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133. These derivatives pertain to variable rate notes issued in conjunction with the securitization of our contracts. Any change in the market value of such derivatives and any income or expense recognized on such derivatives is recorded to noninterest income.
We have entered into or committed to interest rate swaps as hedges against deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase to manage interest rate risk exposure. The fair value of the interest rate swap agreements is included in deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, respectively and any change in the fair value is reported as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Related interest income or expense is settled on a quarterly basis and is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the period during which cash flows on the hedged items affect income.
The Asset/ Liability Committee monitors our hedging activities to ensure that the value of hedges, their correlation to the contracts being hedged and the amounts being hedged continue to provide effective protection against interest rate risk. The amount and timing of hedging transactions are determined by our senior management based upon the monitoring activities of the Asset/ Liability Committee. As a result of our approach to interest rate risk management and our hedging strategies, we do not anticipate that changes in interest rates will materially affect our results of operations or liquidity, although we can provide no assurance in this regard. There were no material changes in market risks in the current year compared with the prior year.
59
The following table provides information about our derivative financial instruments and other financial instruments used that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. For loans, securities and liabilities with contractual maturities, the table presents principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates by contractual maturities as well as our historical experience of the impact of interest rate fluctuations on the prepayment of real estate loans, contracts and MBS. For passbook, money market and interest bearing demand deposit accounts that have no contractual maturity, the table presents principal cash flows and, as applicable, related weighted average interest rates based on our historical experience, managements judgment and statistical analysis, as applicable, concerning their most likely withdrawal behaviors. For interest rate swap agreements, the table presents notional amounts and, as applicable, weighted average interest rates by contractual maturity date. Notional amounts are used to calculate the contractual payments to be exchanged under the contracts.
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | Thereafter | Total | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate sensitive assets:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed interest rate loans
|
$ | 3,747,906 | $ | 3,049,438 | $ | 2,055,139 | $ | 1,219,004 | $ | 665,749 | $ | 54,129 | $ | 10,791,365 | $ | 11,662,739 | |||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate
|
11.08 | % | 11.04 | % | 10.80 | % | 10.38 | % | 7.44 | % | 8.65 | % | 10.70 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Variable interest rate loans
|
$ | 347,118 | $ | 347,118 | $ | 341,651 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate
|
4.72 | % | 4.72 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed interest rate securities
|
$ | 1,731,656 | $ | 551,627 | $ | 245,461 | $ | 124,273 | $ | 65,540 | $ | 112,350 | $ | 2,830,907 | $ | 2,868,539 | |||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate
|
2.73 | % | 3.55 | % | 3.73 | % | 3.77 | % | 3.83 | % | 4.06 | % | 3.10 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Variable interest rate securities
|
$ | 566,047 | $ | 566,047 | $ | 561,358 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate
|
2.42 | % | 2.42 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate sensitive
liabilities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Passbook deposits
|
$ | 3,513 | $ | 2,380 | $ | 1,389 | $ | 7,282 | $ | 7,132 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate
|
0.10 | % | 0.11 | % | 0.11 | % | 0.10 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Money market and interest bearing demand deposits
|
$ | 556,126 | $ | 288,446 | $ | 119,577 | $ | 964,149 | $ | 954,475 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate
|
0.93 | % | 1.30 | % | 1.50 | % | 1.11 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit
|
$ | 757,293 | $ | 26,886 | $ | 3,207 | $ | 3,309 | $ | 325 | $ | 791,020 | $ | 793,933 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate
|
1.70 | % | 3.00 | % | 2.96 | % | 3.95 | % | 2.11 | % | 1.76 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Notes payable under automobile secured
financing fixed
|
$ | 3,804,431 | $ | 2,137,247 | $ | 1,577,606 | $ | 922,160 | $ | 8,441,444 | $ | 8,697,847 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate
|
3.29 | % | 2.97 | % | 3.32 | % | 2.98 | % | 3.18 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes payable on automobile secured
financing variable
|
$ | 1,813,197 | $ | 1,813,197 | $ | 1,813,197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate
|
1.15 | % | 1.15 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other fixed interest rate borrowings
|
$ | 548,489 | $ | 99,326 | $ | 298,172 | $ | 945,987 | $ | 946,832 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate
|
1.02 | % | 8.87 | % | 9.60 | % | 4.58 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other variable interest rate borrowings
|
$ | 9,046 | $ | 9,046 | $ | 9,049 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate
|
2.64 | % | 2.64 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate sensitive
derivative financial instruments: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreements
|
$ | 1,714,769 | $ | (724,865 | ) | $ | (334,454 | ) | $ | (210,950 | ) | $ | (444,500 | ) | $ | (115,529 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Average pay rate
|
4.27 | % | 3.92 | % | 3.20 | % | 7.28 | % | 6.00 | % | 4.59 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Average receive rate
|
1.21 | % | 1.19 | % | 1.21 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.16 | % | 1.19 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Euro-dollar futures contracts
|
$ | 346,225 | $ | (139,636 | ) | $ | (107,619 | ) | $ | (98,970 | ) |
60
Glossary
ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES: An account established to cover probable credit losses. If we believe a loan is uncollectible, we set aside in the allowance account a portion of earnings equal to the difference between unpaid principal and the market value of the loan. If the loan is charged off, we reduce the loan balance and the allowance by equal amounts.
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES: Securities that are backed by financial assets such as automobile contracts.
AUTOMOBILE CONTRACTS: Closed-end loans secured by a first lien on a vehicle.
BOOK VALUE PER COMMON SHARE: The value of a share of common stock based on the values at which the assets are recorded on the balance sheet determined by dividing shareholders equity excluding accumulated other comprehensive income or loss by the total number of common shares outstanding.
CHARGEOFF: A loan written off as uncollectible.
CHARGEOFF RATE: Net annualized chargeoffs divided by average receivables outstanding for the period.
COMMERCIAL LOAN COMMITMENTS: Legally binding agreements to provide commercial financing at a future date.
CONDUIT FINANCING: A transaction involving the transfer of a pool of assets to a trust, wherein securities representing undivided interests in, or obligations of, the trust, are purchased by an investor that issues short-term notes. The transaction is treated as a secured financing.
CORE CAPITAL: A capital measure applicable to savings institutions. The Banks core capital is comprised of common shareholders equity (excluding certain components of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss), minority interest in includable consolidated subsidiaries, less investments in and advances to nonincludable subsidiaries.
CORE CAPITAL RATIO: A regulatory measurement of capital adequacy. The Banks core capital ratio is core capital to total assets adjusted for assets in certain subsidiaries that cannot be included and certain unrealized gains or losses on certain securities and cash flow hedges.
DEALER PARTICIPATION: The amount paid to a dealer for the purchase of an automobile contract in excess of the principal amount financed.
DELINQUENCY: A method of determining aging of past due accounts based on the status of payments under the loan.
DERIVATIVES: Interest rate swaps, futures, forwards, option contracts or other financial instruments used for asset and liability management purposes. These instruments derive their values or contractually determined cash flows from the price of an underlying asset or liability, reference rate, index or other security.
DEFERRED TAX ASSET: An asset attributable to deductible temporary differences and carryforwards. A deferred tax asset is measured using the applicable enacted tax rate and provisions of the enacted tax law.
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITY: A liability attributable to taxable temporary differences. A deferred tax liability is measured using the applicable enacted tax rate and provisions of the enacted law.
DIVIDEND PAYOUT RATIO: Dividends per share divided by net income per share.
EARNING PER SHARE (EPS): The most common method of expressing a companys profitability. Its purpose is to indicate how effective an enterprise has been in using the resources provided by common shareholders. EPS is usually presented in two ways: basic EPS and diluted EPS. The computation of basic EPS includes other instruments that are equivalent to common stock. Diluted EPS includes all instruments that have the potential of causing additional shares of common stock to be issued, such as unexercised stock options.
61
EURO-DOLLAR FUTURES CONTRACTS: Futures contracts used as a hedge to lock in a gross spread on a future securitization transaction prior to closing the transaction.
FEDERAL FUNDS: Non-interest bearing deposits held by member banks at the Federal Reserve Bank.
FEE INCOME: Income from documentation fees, late charges, deferment fees, transaction processing fees, service charges on deposit accounts and other fees.
FHLB: The Federal Home Loan Bank, a network of twelve regional Federal Home Loan Banks chartered by Congress in 1932 to ensure financial institutions have access to money to lend to consumers for home mortgages.
FHLMC: The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, a government-chartered corporation that buys qualified mortgage loans from the financial institutions that originate them, securitizes the loans, and distributes the securities through the dealer community.
FNMA: The Federal National Mortgage Association, a congressionally chartered corporation that buys mortgages on the secondary market, pools them and sells them as mortgage-backed securities to investors on the open market.
FORWARD AGREEMENTS: Contracts to exchange payments on a specified future date, based on a market change in interest rates from trade date to contract settlement date.
GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (GAAP): Accounting rules and conventions defining acceptable practices in preparing financial statements in the United States of America. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), an independent self-regulatory organization, is the primary source of accounting rules.
GNMA: The Government National Mortgage Association, a U.S. Government-owned corporation that guarantees timely payment of principal and interest on specified mortgage-backed certificates.
HEDGE: A derivative instrument designed to reduce or eliminate risk, such as interest rate risk. To be treated as a hedge under GAAP, the instrument must meet certain requirements as defined under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended, also known as SFAS 133. Under SFAS 133, a derivative must be expected to be highly effective in reducing the hedged risk in order to utilize the special accounting allowed for hedges. In addition, the hedge must be assessed as being highly effective on an ongoing basis throughout its life. The ineffective portion of a hedge is recorded in earnings immediately.
HOLDING COMPANY: A corporation or other entity that owns a majority of stock or securities of one or more other corporations, thus obtaining control of the other corporations.
INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES: The sum of deposits, notes, subordinated debt and other borrowings on which interest expense is incurred.
INTEREST EARNING ASSETS: The sum of loans and investments on which interest income is earned.
INTEREST RATE SPREAD: The difference between the yield on our interest earning assets and the rate paid on our interest bearing liabilities.
INTEREST RATE SWAP: A contract between two parties to exchange interest payments on a notional amount for a specified period. Typically, one party makes fixed rate payments, while the other party makes payments using a variable rate. Such a transaction is commonly used to manage the asset or liability sensitivity of a balance sheet by converting fixed rate assets or liabilities to floating rates, or vice versa.
LIBOR: London Interbank Offered Rate, which is a widely quoted market rate that is frequently the index used to determine the rate at which our subsidiaries or we borrow funds.
LIQUIDITY: A measure of how quickly we can convert assets to cash or raise additional cash by issuing debt.
62
MANAGED LOANS or MANAGED PORTFOLIO: Loans on the balance sheet plus contracts securitized in transactions treated as sales under GAAP, which we continue to service.
MINORITY INTEREST: Less than 50% ownership of a corporations voting stock or not enough ownership to control company operations. When a parent owns a majority (but less than 100%) of a subsidiarys stock, the Consolidated Financial Statements must reflect the minoritys interest in the subsidiary. The minority interest as shown on the Consolidated Statements of Income is equal to the minoritys proportionate share of the subsidiarys net income. The minority interest as shown on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition is equal to the minoritys proportionate share of the subsidiarys net assets.
MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITY (MBS): A security secured by or representing an undivided interest in a pool of mortgage loans each of which mortgage loans is secured by a completed single family dwelling (one-to-four family units), which security is either guaranteed by GNMA or issued or guaranteed by FNMA or FHLMC.
MORTGAGE LOAN: Closed-end loans and revolving lines of credit secured by first or second liens on residential real estate.
NET CHARGEOFFS or NET CREDIT LOSSES: The amount of loans written off as uncollectible, net of the recovery of loans previously written off as uncollectible.
NET INTEREST INCOME: Interest income and loan fees on interest earning assets less the interest expense incurred on all interest bearing liabilities.
NET INTEREST MARGIN: Interest income from receivables and other interest earning assets reduced by interest expense as a percentage of the average balance of such interest earning assets.
NET YIELD ON AVERAGE INTEREST EARNING ASSETS: The average interest rate earned on interest earning assets less the average interest rate paid on interest bearing liabilities.
NONACCRUAL LOANS or NONPERFORMING LOANS: Loans on which we no longer accrue interest because ultimate collection is unlikely.
NONINTEREST EXPENSE: All expenses other than interest expense.
NONINTEREST INCOME: All income other than interest income.
NONPERFORMING ASSETS (NPAs): Nonperforming loans, repossessed automobiles and real estate owned.
NON-PRIME BORROWERS: Borrowers who have overcome past credit difficulties.
NOTIONAL AMOUNT: The principal amount of a financial instrument on which a derivative transaction is based. In an interest rate swap, for example, the notional amount is used to calculate the interest rate cash flows to be exchanged. No exchange of principal occurs.
OWNED LOANS: Loans held on our balance sheet.
PRIME BORROWERS: Borrowers who have strong credit histories.
PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES: A charge to earnings to recognize that all loans will not be fully paid. The amount is determined based on such factors as our actual loss experience, managements expectations of probable credit losses, as well as current economic trends.
REAL ESTATE LOAN: Closed-end loans and revolving lines of credit secured by first or second liens on residential real estate.
REAL ESTATE OWNED (REO): Real estate acquired in foreclosure or comparable proceedings under which possession of the collateral has been taken.
REINVESTMENT CONTRACTS: A series of agreements between WFS, the Bank and WFAL2 through which WFS has access to the cash flows of certain securitizations. Under such agreements, collections of
63
RETAINED INTEREST IN SECURITIZED ASSETS (RISA): An asset that represents our contractual right to receive interest and other cash flows from our securitization trusts after the investors receive their contractual return.
RETAINED INTEREST INCOME OR EXPENSE: The excess cash flows on the contracts sold through securitizations treated as sales less the amortization of the retained interest in securitized assets. The excess cash flows represent all cash received on the contracts securitized less payments to investors for principal and interest.
RETURN ON AVERAGE MANAGED CONTRACTS: A financial measurement of our overall performance. Return on average managed contracts is the ratio of net income divided by average managed contracts.
RETURN ON AVERAGE SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: A measure of how effective a business has been in investing its net worth. Return on equity is expressed as a ratio, calculated by dividing net income by average equity excluding accumulated other comprehensive income or loss.
RISK-ADJUSTED MARGIN: The net interest margin less the chargeoff rate.
RISK-WEIGHTED ASSETS: An amount used in determining risk-based capital ratios applicable to savings institutions. The amount of risk-weighted assets is calculated by taking the face amount of assets on and off the balance sheet and applying a factor based on the inherent risk of such asset as defined by regulation.
SECURED FINANCING: A transaction where interests in a pool of financial assets, such as automobile contracts, are sold to investors. The contracts are transferred to a trust that issues interests that are sold to investors. The contracts and related debt remain on our balance sheet.
SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE: An agreement between a seller and a buyer, generally of government or agency securities, whereby the seller agrees to repurchase the securities at an agreed-upon price at a future date.
SECURITIZATION: A transaction involving the transfer of a pool of assets, to a trust, wherein securities representing undivided interests in, or obligations of, the trust are purchased by investors. The securities are repaid by the cash flows from the assets transferred to the trust. The transaction is treated as either a secured financing or a sale, depending on the terms of the transaction.
SFAS: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards.
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: A balance sheet amount that represents the total investment in the corporation by holders of common stock.
SPREAD ACCOUNT: An account of a securitization trust into which excess cash flows generated by the assets securitized are deposited. The terms of the account, which vary with each securitization, typically state a maximum balance, generally expressed as a percentage of the current principal balance of the notes and certificates. The initial deposit is generally funded by the company securitizing the assets and is expressed as a percentage of the original balance of the notes and certificates. Once the required or maximum spread account balance is reached, the excess is typically released to the certificate holder.
SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES: Borrowing in the form of an unsecured note, debenture, or other debt instrument, which in the event of the debtors bankruptcy, has a claim to the assets of the debtor with a lower priority than other classes of debt.
SUBSIDIARY: An organization controlled by another organization or company.
64
SUPPLEMENTARY CAPITAL: Instruments that qualify as additional regulatory capital for total risk-based capital measurement. The Banks supplementary capital includes subordinated debentures and general valuation loan and lease loss allowance limited to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. Supplementary capital is limited to 100% of core capital.
TANGIBLE CAPITAL: A capital measure applicable to savings institutions. The Banks tangible capital is the same as its core capital because it does not have any intangible assets that would be deducted from core capital to derive tangible capital.
TIER 1 RISK-BASED CAPITAL: A capital measure applicable to savings institutions. The Banks tier 1 risk-based capital equals core capital less a dollar-for-dollar reduction for its residual interests in securitized assets and other recourse obligations.
TIER 1 RISK-BASED CAPITAL RATIO: A regulatory measurement of capital adequacy. The ratio of the Banks tier 1 risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets.
TOTAL EQUITY: The sum of shareholders equity excluding other comprehensive income or loss and including minority interest.
TOTAL RISK-BASED CAPITAL: A capital measure applicable to savings institutions. The Banks total risk-based capital equals its tier 1 risk-based capital plus supplementary capital.
TOTAL RISK-BASED CAPITAL RATIO: A regulatory measurement of capital adequacy. The ratio of total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets.
WFS REINVESTMENT CONTRACT: An agreement between WFS and the Bank whereby the Bank allows WFS to utilize the funds invested in the reinvestment contract at the Bank. In return for the use of such funds, WFS pays the Bank a fee as consideration for the pledge of collateral by the Bank.
65
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
Our Consolidated Financial Statements begin on page F-3 of this report.
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
None.
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures |
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of the filing date of this annual report. Based on their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective. There has been no significant change in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the controls and procedures subsequent to the date of their evaluation.
66
PART III
Certain information required by Part III is omitted from this report, as we will file a definitive proxy statement, also known as the Proxy Statement, within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held April 26, 2004, and the information included therein is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 10. | Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant |
Information regarding directors appears under the caption Election of Directors in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. Information regarding executive officers appears under the caption Executive Officers Who Are Not Directors in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. Information regarding Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance appears under that caption in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. | Executive Compensation |
Information regarding executive compensation appears under the caption Compensation of Executive Officers in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management |
Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management appears under the caption Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
None.
Item 14. | Principal Accounting Fees and Services |
Information regarding principal accounting fees and services appears under the caption Audit Fees; Audit Related Fees; Tax Fees; and Other Fees in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
67
PART IV
Item 15. | Financial Statement Schedules, Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
(a) List of documents filed as part of this report:
(1) Financial Statements |
The following consolidated financial statements and report of independent auditors for us and our subsidiaries are included in this Report commencing on page F-2: | |
Report of Independent Auditors | |
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at December 31, 2003 and 2002 | |
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 | |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
(2) Financial Statement Schedules |
Schedules to the consolidated financial statements are omitted because the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in our consolidated financial statements or related notes. |
(3) Exhibits |
Exhibit | ||||
No. | Description of Exhibit | |||
3 | .1 | Articles of Incorporation(11) | ||
3 | .1.1 | Certificate of Amendment of the Articles of Incorporation of Westcorp | ||
3 | .2 | Bylaws(11) | ||
4 | .1 | Indenture dated as of July 25, 1997 issued by Western Financial Bank, formerly Western Financial Savings Bank, F.S.B., with respect to $150,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of 8.875% Subordinated Capital Debentures due 2007(7) | ||
4 | .2 | Indenture dated as of May 3, 2002 issued by Western Financial Bank, formerly Western Financial Savings Bank, F.S.B., with respect to $300,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of 9.625% Subordinated Capital Debentures due 2012(8) | ||
10 | .1 | Amended and Restated 1991 Stock Option Plan of Westcorp(10) | ||
10 | .2 | Westcorp 2001 Stock Option Plan(9) | ||
10 | .3 | 2000 Executive Deferral Plan V(8) | ||
10 | .3.1 | First Amendment to the Westcorp Executive Deferral Plan V, dated as of April 1, 2003(10) | ||
10 | .4 | Amended and Restated Tax Sharing Agreement between Westcorp And its subsidiaries, dated September 30, 2002(9) | ||
10 | .4.1 | First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Tax Sharing Agreement, Dated as of January 1, 2003(10) | ||
10 | .4.2 | Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Tax Sharing Amendment, dated August 1, 2003(10) | ||
10 | .5 | Master Reinvestment Contract between WFS Financial Inc and Western Financial Bank, F.S.B., dated May 1, 1995(1) | ||
10 | .6 | Amendment No. 1, dated as of June 1, 1995, to the Restated Master Reinvestment Reimbursement Agreement(5) |
68
Exhibit | ||||
No. | Description of Exhibit | |||
10 | .7 | Amended and Restated Master Collateral Assignment Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2000(6) | ||
10 | .8 | Form of WFS Financial Inc Dealer Agreement(10) | ||
10 | .9 | Form of WFS Financial Inc Loan Application(10) | ||
10 | .10 | Amended and Restated Westcorp Employee Stock Ownership and Salary Savings Plan, dated January 1, 2001(8) | ||
10 | .10.1 | Amendment No. 1, dated as of January 1, 2001, to Amended and Restated Westcorp Employee Stock Ownership and Salary Savings Plan(8) | ||
10 | .10.2 | Amendment No. 2, dated as of January 1, 2001, to Amended and Restated Westcorp Employee Stock Ownership and Salary Savings Plan(8) | ||
10 | .10.3 | Amendment No. 3, dated as of January 1, 2001, to Amended and Restated Westcorp Employee Stock Ownership and Salary Savings Plan(10) | ||
10 | .10.4 | Amendment No. 4, dated as of January 1, 2001, to Amended and Restated Westcorp Employee Stock Ownership and Salary Savings Plan(10) | ||
10 | .10.5 | Amendment No. 5, dated as of January 1, 2001, to Amended and Restated Westcorp Employee Stock Ownership and Salary Savings Plan(10) | ||
10 | .10.6 | Amendment No. 6, dated as of November 1, 2003, to Amended and Restated Westcorp Employee Stock Ownership and Salary Savings Plan | ||
10 | .10.7 | Amendment No. 7, dated as of December 1, 2003, to Amended and Restated Westcorp Employee Stock Ownership and Salary Savings Plan | ||
10 | .11 | Amended and Restated WFS 1996 Incentive Stock Option Plan(2) | ||
10 | .12 | Amended and Restated Allocation Agreement, dated March 31, 2003(10) | ||
10 | .12.1 | First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Allocation Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2003(10) | ||
10 | .12.2 | Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Allocation Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2003(10) | ||
10 | .13 | Employment Agreement(3)(4) | ||
10 | .14 | Logo License Agreement between Western Financial Bank, Westcorp, WFS Financial Inc, Western Consumer Products, WFS Receivables Corporation, WFS Receivables Corporation 2, WFS Receivables Corporation 3, WFS Financial Auto Loans, Inc., The Hammond Company, The Mortgage Bankers, WFS Funding Inc., WFS Investments, Inc., Westran Services Corporation, WestFin Insurance Agency, Inc., Western Auto Investments, Inc., Western Consumer Services, Inc., Westhrift Life Insurance Entity, Inc., Western Reconveyance Entity, Inc., and WFS Web Investments, Inc.(9) | ||
10 | .14.1 | First Amendment to the Logo and License Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2003(10) | ||
10 | .15 | Travel Services Agreement between Westran Services Corporation and Westcorp, Western Financial Bank, WFS Financial Inc, and Westfin Insurance Agency, Inc., dated August 28, 2002(9) | ||
10 | .15.1 | First Amendment to the Travel Services Agreement, dated July 16, 2003(10) | ||
10 | .17 | Interest Rate Swap Guarantee Agreement, dated May 10, 2001(10) | ||
10 | .17.1 | First Amendment to the Interest Rate Swap Guarantee Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2003(10) | ||
21 | .1 | Subsidiaries of Westcorp | ||
23 | .1 | Consent of Independent Auditors, Ernst & Young LLP | ||
31 | .1 | CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
31 | .2 | CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
32 | .1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
32 | .2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
69
(1) | Exhibits previously filed with WFS Financial Inc Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-93068), filed August 8, 1995 incorporated herein by reference under Exhibit Number indicated. | |
(2) | Exhibit previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the WFS Financial Inc Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-40121), filed November 13, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(3) | Employment Agreement dated February 27, 1998 between WFS Financial Inc, Westcorp and Lee A. Whatcott (will be provided to the SEC upon request). | |
(4) | Employment Agreement, dated November 15, 1998 between the WFS Financial Inc, Westcorp and Mark Olson (will be provided to the SEC upon request). | |
(5) | Exhibits previously filed with Annual Report on Form 10-K of WFS Financial Inc for the year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 33-93068) as filed on or about March 31, 1999. | |
(6) | Exhibits previously filed with WFS Registration Statements on Form S-2 (File No. 333-91277) filed November 19, 1999 and subsequently amended on January 20, 2000 incorporated by reference under Exhibit Number indicated. | |
(7) | Exhibit previously filed with Western Financial Bank, formerly Western Financial Bank, F.S.B., Offering Circular with the OTS, dated July 25, 1997 (will be provided to the SEC upon request). | |
(8) | Exhibit previously filed with Annual Report on Form 10-K of Westcorp for the year ended December 31, 2001 as filed on or about March 29, 2002. | |
(9) | Exhibit previously filed with Annual Report on Form 10-K of Westcorp for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed on or about March 28, 2003. |
(10) | Exhibit previously filed with Westcorp Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-110244) filed November 5, 2003 and subsequently amended on November 10, 2003 incorporated by reference under Exhibit Number indicated. |
(11) | Exhibit previously filed with Westcorp Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-34286) filed April 11, 1990, incorporated herein by reference under Exhibit Numbers indicated. |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
On October 23, 2003, we filed a current report on Form 8-K dated October 21, 2003, reporting information under Items 7, 9 and 12. | |
On November 12, 2003, we filed a current report on Form 8-K dated November 10, 2003, reporting information under Items 5 and 7. | |
On November 17, 2003, we filed a current report on Form 8-K dated November 17, 2003, reporting information under Items 5 and 7. |
70
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
WFS FINANCIAL INC |
Dated: March 11, 2004
BY: | /s/ ERNEST S. RADY |
|
|
Ernest S. Rady | |
Chairman of the Board and | |
Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature | Title | Date | ||
/s/ ERNEST S. RADY Ernest S. Rady |
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
March 11, 2004 | ||
/s/ THOMAS A. WOLFE Thomas A. Wolfe |
President and Director | March 11, 2004 | ||
/s/ JUDITH M. BARDWICK Judith M. Bardwick |
Director | March 11, 2004 | ||
/s/ ROBERT T. BARNUM Robert T. Barnum |
Director | March 11, 2004 | ||
/s/ JAMES R. DOWLAN James R. Dowlan |
Director | March 11, 2004 | ||
/s/ DUANE A. NELLES Duane A. Nelles |
Director | March 11, 2004 | ||
/s/ HARRY RADY Harry Rady |
Director | March 11, 2004 | ||
/s/ LEE A. WHATCOTT Lee A. Whatcott |
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | March 11, 2004 |
71
WESTCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page | ||||
F-2 | ||||
Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
||||
F-3 | ||||
F-4 | ||||
F-5 | ||||
F-6 | ||||
F-7 |
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Shareholders and Board of Directors
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Westcorp and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of Westcorps management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Westcorp and subsidiaries at December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
Los Angeles, California
F-2
WESTCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 50,073 | $ | 25,211 | ||||||
Interest bearing deposits with other financial
institutions
|
41,009 | 59,004 | ||||||||
Other short-term investments
|
291,000 | |||||||||
Cash and due from banks
|
382,082 | 84,215 | ||||||||
Restricted cash
|
245,399 | 71,763 | ||||||||
Investment securities available for sale
|
117,749 | 56,766 | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale
|
2,701,797 | 2,649,657 | ||||||||
Loans receivable
|
11,138,483 | 9,443,901 | ||||||||
Allowance for credit losses
|
(301,602 | ) | (269,352 | ) | ||||||
Loans receivable, net
|
10,836,881 | 9,174,549 | ||||||||
Amounts due from trusts
|
101,473 | |||||||||
Premises and equipment, net
|
81,814 | 78,664 | ||||||||
Interest receivable
|
80,957 | 77,581 | ||||||||
Other assets
|
169,241 | 187,971 | ||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS
|
$ | 14,615,920 | $ | 12,482,639 | ||||||
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||||
Deposits
|
$ | 1,972,856 | $ | 1,974,984 | ||||||
Notes payable on automobile secured financing
|
10,254,641 | 8,494,678 | ||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
222,489 | 276,600 | ||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
328,644 | 336,275 | ||||||||
Subordinated debentures
|
394,854 | 400,561 | ||||||||
Amounts held on behalf of trustee
|
177,642 | |||||||||
Other liabilities
|
188,517 | 107,036 | ||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
13,362,001 | 11,767,776 | ||||||||
Minority interest
|
131,434 | 101,666 | ||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
||||||||||
Common stock (par value $1.00 per share;
authorized 65,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 51,698,398
shares in 2003 and 39,200,474 shares
in 2002) |
51,698 | 39,200 | ||||||||
Paid-in capital
|
710,001 | 350,018 | ||||||||
Retained earnings
|
427,527 | 325,529 | ||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax
|
(66,741 | ) | (101,550 | ) | ||||||
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
1,122,485 | 613,197 | ||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
$ | 14,615,920 | $ | 12,482,639 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
WESTCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||
Interest income:
|
||||||||||||||
Loans, including fees
|
$ | 1,153,768 | $ | 1,021,317 | $ | 821,113 | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
83,663 | 113,154 | 133,415 | |||||||||||
Investment securities
|
3,057 | 2,815 | 3,272 | |||||||||||
Other
|
4,529 | 5,654 | 4,827 | |||||||||||
TOTAL INTEREST INCOME
|
1,245,017 | 1,142,940 | 962,627 | |||||||||||
Interest expense:
|
||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
64,634 | 80,015 | 114,831 | |||||||||||
Notes payable on automobile secured financing
|
416,577 | 406,851 | 333,768 | |||||||||||
Other
|
50,225 | 44,050 | 43,345 | |||||||||||
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE
|
531,436 | 530,916 | 491,944 | |||||||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME
|
713,581 | 612,024 | 470,683 | |||||||||||
Provision for credit losses
|
294,006 | 306,233 | 196,977 | |||||||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR CREDIT
LOSSES
|
419,575 | 305,791 | 273,706 | |||||||||||
Noninterest income:
|
||||||||||||||
Automobile lending
|
90,511 | 62,332 | 62,758 | |||||||||||
Mortgage banking
|
1,335 | 1,421 | 1,495 | |||||||||||
Insurance income
|
8,680 | 10,561 | 9,090 | |||||||||||
Other
|
9,631 | 16,339 | 5,556 | |||||||||||
TOTAL NONINTEREST INCOME
|
110,157 | 90,653 | 78,899 | |||||||||||
Noninterest expenses:
|
||||||||||||||
Salaries and associate benefits
|
163,436 | 137,462 | 142,322 | |||||||||||
Credit and collections
|
35,977 | 36,429 | 27,707 | |||||||||||
Data processing
|
17,751 | 18,711 | 18,396 | |||||||||||
Occupancy
|
15,678 | 15,063 | 14,615 | |||||||||||
Telephone
|
4,818 | 5,394 | 6,187 | |||||||||||
Other
|
44,128 | 38,247 | 35,644 | |||||||||||
TOTAL NONINTEREST EXPENSES
|
281,788 | 251,306 | 244,871 | |||||||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX
|
247,944 | 145,138 | 107,734 | |||||||||||
Income tax
|
98,275 | 52,267 | 41,675 | |||||||||||
INCOME BEFORE MINORITY INTEREST
|
149,669 | 92,871 | 66,059 | |||||||||||
Minority interest in earnings of subsidiaries
|
26,064 | 13,153 | 10,369 | |||||||||||
NET INCOME
|
$ | 123,605 | $ | 79,718 | $ | 55,690 | ||||||||
Earnings per common share:
|
||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 2.88 | $ | 2.07 | $ | 1.62 | ||||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 2.85 | $ | 2.05 | $ | 1.61 | ||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||
Basic
|
42,867,262 | 38,588,710 | 34,277,856 | |||||||||||
Diluted
|
43,397,211 | 38,922,611 | 34,485,127 | |||||||||||
Dividends declared
|
$ | 0.52 | $ | 0.48 | $ | 0.44 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
WESTCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Paid-in | Retained | Income (Loss), | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Stock | Capital | Earnings | Net of Tax | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2001
|
31,931,826 | $ | 31,932 | $ | 246,889 | $ | 223,163 | $ | (14,816 | ) | $ | 487,168 | |||||||||||||
Net income
|
55,690 | 55,690 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains on securities available for sale
and retained interest in securitized assets, net of tax(1)
|
12,309 | 12,309 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of
tax(2)
|
(75,048 | ) | (75,048 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for losses on
securities available for sale included in net income, net of
tax(3)
|
1,050 | 1,050 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for losses on cash
flow hedges included in income, net of tax(4)
|
15,599 | 15,599 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income
|
9,600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock
|
3,870,665 | 3,870 | 58,271 | 62,141 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of subsidiary common stock
|
(3,205 | ) | (3,205 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends
|
(15,000 | ) | (15,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2001
|
35,802,491 | 35,802 | 301,955 | 263,853 | (60,906 | ) | 540,704 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
79,718 | 79,718 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains on securities available for sale
and retained interest in securitized assets, net of tax(1)
|
28,605 | 28,605 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of
tax(2)
|
(135,422 | ) | (135,422 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for gains on
securities available for sale included in net income, net of
tax(3)
|
(3 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for losses on cash
flow hedges included in income, net of tax(4)
|
66,176 | 66,176 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income
|
39,074 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock
|
3,397,983 | 3,398 | 49,468 | 52,866 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of subsidiary common stock
|
(1,405 | ) | (1,405 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends
|
(18,042 | ) | (18,042 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
39,200,474 | 39,200 | 350,018 | 325,529 | (101,550 | ) | 613,197 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
123,605 | 123,605 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized losses on securities available for
sale, net of tax(1)
|
(7,315 | ) | (7,315 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of
tax(2)
|
(21,285 | ) | (21,285 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for gains on
securities available for sale included in net income, net of
tax(3)
|
(5,058 | ) | (5,058 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for losses on cash
flow hedges included in income, net of tax(4)
|
68,467 | 68,467 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income
|
158,414 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock
|
12,371,500 | 12,372 | 356,863 | 369,235 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of subsidiary common stock
|
702 | 702 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options expensed(5)
|
669 | 669 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised
|
126,424 | 126 | 1,749 | 1,875 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends
|
(21,607 | ) | (21,607 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
51,698,398 | $ | 51,698 | $ | 710,001 | $ | 427,527 | $ | (66,741 | ) | $ | 1,122,485 | |||||||||||||
(1) | The pre-tax amount of unrealized losses on securities available for sale and retained interest in securitized assets was $12.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared with unrealized gains of $48.5 million and $20.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. |
(2) | The pre-tax amount of unrealized losses on cash flow hedges was $35.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared with and $230 million and $127 million for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. |
(3) | The pre-tax amount of unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale reclassified into earnings was $8.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared with $5.0 thousand and $1.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001. |
(4) | The pre-tax amount of unrealized losses on cash flow hedges reclassified into earnings was $114 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared with $112 million and $26.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The amount reclassified into earnings in 2001 includes $1.8 million of the $4.8 million cumulative effect adjustment related to the adoption of SFAS No. 133. |
(5) | Amount represents expense related to stock options granted. |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
WESTCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 123,605 | $ | 79,718 | $ | 55,690 | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
|
|||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses
|
294,006 | 306,233 | 196,977 | ||||||||||
Depreciation
|
13,771 | 14,654 | 14,618 | ||||||||||
Amortization of losses on cash flow hedges
|
54,523 | 54,509 | 5,089 | ||||||||||
Amortization of premium on mortgage-backed
securities
|
70,177 | 38,319 | 28,879 | ||||||||||
Amortization of participation paid to dealers
|
110,120 | 92,151 | 64,045 | ||||||||||
Amortization of retained interest in securitized
assets
|
36,461 | 75,545 | |||||||||||
Amortization, other
|
1,927 | 2,073 | 644 | ||||||||||
(Gain) loss on sales, net
|
(12,396 | ) | (9,380 | ) | 8,088 | ||||||||
Other
|
(6,119 | ) | (2,652 | ) | (3,370 | ) | |||||||
Loans held for sale:
|
|||||||||||||
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans
|
554 | 3,382 | |||||||||||
Decrease (increase) in other assets
|
1,220 | (45,195 | ) | (34,365 | ) | ||||||||
Increase in other liabilities
|
72,961 | 15,148 | 14,774 | ||||||||||
Other, net
|
27,019 | 9,215 | 9,325 | ||||||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
750,814 | 591,808 | 439,321 | ||||||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||||||||
Loans receivable:
|
|||||||||||||
Origination of loans
|
(6,416,501 | ) | (5,797,684 | ) | (5,184,915 | ) | |||||||
Participation paid to dealers
|
(141,079 | ) | (129,272 | ) | (120,194 | ) | |||||||
Loan payments and payoffs
|
5,015,241 | 3,725,870 | 2,484,479 | ||||||||||
Investment securities available for sale:
|
|||||||||||||
Purchases
|
(139,912 | ) | (59,449 | ) | (67,524 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from sale
|
82,288 | 75,629 | 26,998 | ||||||||||
Proceeds from maturities
|
427 | 1,646 | 1,308 | ||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|||||||||||||
Purchases
|
(2,165,051 | ) | (1,624,936 | ) | (1,233,390 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from sale
|
157,828 | 507,839 | |||||||||||
Payments received
|
1,872,193 | 1,077,868 | 881,094 | ||||||||||
Decrease in amounts due from trusts
|
34,658 | 220,920 | |||||||||||
Purchase of premises and equipment
|
(22,577 | ) | (18,920 | ) | (10,079 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment
|
7,940 | 8,348 | 43 | ||||||||||
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
(1,749,203 | ) | (2,706,242 | ) | (2,493,421 | ) | |||||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in deposits
|
24,011 | (417,706 | ) | (194,310 | ) | ||||||||
(Decrease) increase in securities sold under
agreements to repurchase
|
(53,103 | ) | 117,954 | (24,931 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from notes payable on automobile secured
financing
|
5,877,506 | 6,912,058 | 3,519,112 | ||||||||||
Payments on notes payable on automobile secured
financing
|
(4,677,911 | ) | (4,336,602 | ) | (1,156,604 | ) | |||||||
Increase (decrease) in borrowings
|
3,155 | (19,178 | ) | (2,734 | ) | ||||||||
Increase in amounts held on behalf of trustee
|
(102,854 | ) | (214,361 | ) | |||||||||
(Decrease) increase in FHLB Advances
|
(7,631 | ) | (207,141 | ) | 133,847 | ||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated debentures
|
292,472 | ||||||||||||
Payments on subordinated debentures
|
(7,315 | ) | (41,134 | ) | (42,892 | ) | |||||||
Increase in restricted cash
|
(173,636 | ) | (71,763 | ) | |||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
371,110 | 52,866 | 62,142 | ||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of subsidiary common stock
|
105 | 16,472 | 13,973 | ||||||||||
Cash dividends
|
(21,607 | ) | (18,042 | ) | (15,000 | ) | |||||||
Payments on cash flow hedges
|
(38,428 | ) | (83,080 | ) | (48,578 | ) | |||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
1,296,256 | 2,094,322 | 2,029,664 | ||||||||||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS
|
297,867 | (20,112 | ) | (24,436 | ) | ||||||||
Cash and due from banks at beginning of year
|
84,215 | 104,327 | 128,763 | ||||||||||
CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS AT END OF YEAR
|
$ | 382,082 | $ | 84,215 | $ | 104,327 | |||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|||||||||||||
Cash paid for:
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 524,146 | $ | 513,944 | $ | 484,821 | |||||||
Income taxes
|
108,403 | 83,267 | 67,906 | ||||||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NONCASH TRANSACTIONS:
|
|||||||||||||
Acquisition of real estate acquired through
foreclosure
|
412 | 1,107 | 3,047 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
WESTCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Note 1 | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly owned subsidiary, Western Financial Bank, also known as the Bank, and its majority owned subsidiary, WFS Financial Inc, also known as WFS. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current years presentation.
Effective January 1, 2003, we regained control over assets of the securitization trusts for all of our outstanding securitization transactions treated as sales for accounting purposes, excluding loans sold in whole loan sales. We regained control of these assets when each trust was given the ability to invest in financial assets not related to the securitization of contracts. In accordance with paragraph 55 of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, also known as SFAS No. 140, and Emerging Issues Task Force 02-9, Accounting for Changes that Result in a Transferor Regaining Control of Financial Assets Sold, we recorded $525 million of automobile contracts and the related notes payable on automobile secured financing on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and have eliminated all remaining amounts due from trusts and amounts held on behalf of trustee for these transactions. We no longer recognize retained interest income or expense or contractual servicing income for these securitization transactions on our Consolidated Statements of Income. Rather, we recognize interest income on automobile contracts held in these trusts and record interest expense on notes payable on automobile secured financings. These loans were considered in the overall evaluation of the adequacy of our allowance for credit losses.
During the first quarter of 2003, Chapter 13 bankruptcy accounts greater than 120 days were reclassified to contracts receivable and the related reserves were reclassified to the allowance for credit losses on the Statement of Financial Condition. Previously, such amounts were reported as nonperforming assets and were included in other assets on the Statement of Financial Condition. The 2002 amounts have been reclassified accordingly. These loans were considered in the overall evaluation of the adequacy of our allowance for credit losses for the periods presented.
During the second quarter of 2003, various cash amounts related to certain securitization transactions were reclassified to restricted cash on the Statement of Financial Condition. Previously, such amounts were reported as a reduction of notes payable on automobile secured financing on the Statement of Financial Condition. The 2002 amounts have been reclassified accordingly.
Use of Estimates |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Nature of Operations |
We are a financial services company that specializes primarily in automobile lending, which is funded by our community banking operations and our asset-backed securitization transactions. We have only one reportable segment.
Cash and Due from Banks |
Cash and due from banks include cash, interest bearing deposits with other financial institutions and other short-term investments, which have no material restrictions as to withdrawal or usage.
F-7
Restricted Cash |
Restricted cash represents amounts that are held by the trustee until such cash is released under the terms of the securitization agreements.
Investment Securities and Mortgage-Backed Securities Available for Sale |
Investment securities and mortgage-backed securities, also known as MBS, are classified as available for sale and carried at fair value. Any change in the fair value is reported as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Any decline in the fair value of the investments which is deemed to be other than temporary is charged against current earnings. The method used in determining the cost of investments sold is specific identification.
Loans Receivable |
Our loan portfolio consists primarily of automobile contracts purchased from automobile dealers on a nonrecourse basis and contracts financed directly with the consumer. If pre-computed finance charges are added to a contract, they are added to the contract balance and carried as an offset against the contract balance as unearned discounts. Amounts paid to dealers are capitalized as dealer participation and amortized over the life of the contract. Additionally, our loan portfolio consists of commercial loans, construction loans, real estate loans and other consumer loans.
Allowance for Credit Losses |
The allowance for credit losses is maintained at a level that we believe is adequate to absorb probable losses in the on balance sheet loan portfolio that can be reasonably estimated. Our determination of the adequacy of the allowance is based on an evaluation of the portfolio, past credit loss experience, current economic conditions, volume, pending contract sales, growth and composition of the loan portfolio, and other relevant factors. The allowance is increased by provisions for credit losses charged against income.
Nonaccrual Loans |
Nonaccrual loans are loans on which accrual of interest has been suspended. Interest is suspended on all real estate loans when, in our judgement, the interest will not be collectible in the normal course of business or when loans are 90 days or more past due or full collection of principal is not assured. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual, interest accrued is reversed against interest income. The accrual of interest income is suspended on all loans, except consumer loans. On these loans, interest continues to accrue until the loans are charged off, which occurs automatically after the loans are past due 120 days, except for accounts that are in Chapter 13 bankruptcy. At the time that a loan is charged off, all accrued interest is reversed. For those accounts that are in Chapter 13 bankruptcy and are contractually past due greater than 120 days, all accrued interest is reversed and income is recognized on a cash basis. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, the amounts of accrued interest reversed were not material.
Premises and Equipment |
Premises and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization and are depreciated over their estimated useful lives principally using the straight-line method for financial reporting and accelerated methods for tax purposes. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lives of the respective leases or the service lives of the improvements, whichever is shorter. Useful lives for premises and equipment are 5 to 39 years for buildings and improvements, 5 to 7 years for furniture and equipment, 3 to 5 years for computers and software, and 5 to 15 years for all other premises and equipment.
F-8
Repossessed Assets |
All accounts for which collateral has been repossessed and the redemption period has expired are reclassified from loans receivable to repossessed assets at fair value with any adjustment recorded against the allowance for credit losses. Repossessed assets were included in other assets on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and are not material.
Real Estate Owned |
Real estate acquired through foreclosure is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. These values are periodically reviewed and write-downs are recorded, if appropriate. Costs of holding this real estate and related gains and losses on disposition are credited or charged to real estate operations as incurred.
Real estate owned is carried net of an allowance for losses which is maintained at a level we believe to be adequate to absorb any probable losses in the portfolio that can be reasonably estimated. Our determination of the adequacy of the allowance is based on an evaluation of past credit loss experience, current economic conditions, selling costs and other relevant factors.
Nonperforming Assets |
Nonperforming assets consist of nonperforming loans that are defined as all nonaccrual loans, repossessed assets, and real estate owned. Nonperforming assets were included in other assets on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and are not material.
Interest Income and Fee Income |
Interest income is earned in accordance with the terms of the loan. For pre-computed contracts, interest is earned monthly, and for simple interest loans, interest is earned daily. Interest income on certain loans is earned using the effective yield method and classified as interest receivable to the extent not collected and reported in interest receivable on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Other loans use the sum of the months digit method, which approximates the effective yield method.
We defer certain loan origination fees, commitment fees, premiums paid to dealers and loan origination costs. The net amount is amortized as an adjustment to the related loans yield over their contractual life. Commitment fees based on a percentage of a customers unused line of credit are recognized over the commitment period. Fees for other services are recorded as income when earned.
Mortgage Banking Income |
Mortgage banking income consists primarily of gain on sale of mortgage loans and other mortgage servicing related fee income.
Insurance Commissions |
Commissions on insurance policies sold are recognized as income over the life of the policies.
Insurance Premiums |
Premiums for life and accident/ health insurance policies are recognized as income over the term of the insurance contract.
Interest Expense |
Interest expense is recognized when incurred. Our level yield calculation for notes payable on automobile secured financing includes the interest on the notes, underwriting discounts, hedge gains or losses and payments under interest rate swap agreements.
F-9
Income Taxes |
We file a consolidated federal tax return, and combined or consolidated returns in states where such filing method is allowed, including subsidiaries as required by such states. In other states, subsidiaries file separate state tax returns.
Fair Values of Financial Instruments |
Fair value information about financial instruments is reported using quoted market prices for which it is practicable to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rates and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instruments. Fair values for certain financial instruments and all non-financial instruments are not required to be disclosed. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not necessarily represent the underlying value of our financial position.
We use the following methods and assumptions in estimating our fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and due from banks: The carrying amounts reported in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition for cash and due from banks approximate those assets fair values. | |
Restricted cash: The carrying amounts reported in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition approximate those assets fair values. | |
Investment securities and MBS: Fair values for investment securities and MBS are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments. | |
Loans receivable: The fair values for loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. | |
Interest rate swap agreements: The fair value is estimated by obtaining market quotes from brokers or internally valuing when market quotes are not readily available. | |
Loan commitments (including fixed and variable): The fair values of loan commitments are based on quoted market prices of similar loans sold in the secondary market. | |
Deposits: The fair values disclosed for demand deposit accounts, passbook accounts, certificate accounts, brokered certificate accounts and certain types of money market accounts are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date, i.e., their carrying amounts. Fair values for fixed rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates of deposit to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits. | |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase, notes payable on automobile secured financing, Federal Home Loan Bank advances, and subordinated debentures: The fair value is estimated by using discounted cash flow analyses based on our current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. | |
Short-term borrowings: The carrying amounts reported in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition approximate their fair values. | |
Amounts held on behalf of trustee: The carrying amounts reported in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition approximate their fair value. |
F-10
Derivative Financial Instruments |
Effective January 1, 2001, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended, also known as SFAS No. 133, which requires all derivatives to be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as hedges are either offset against the change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments directly through income or recognized through accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the balance sheet until the hedged items are recognized in earnings, depending on the nature of the hedges. The ineffective portion of a derivatives change in fair value for a cash flow hedge is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the balance sheet if the hedge is less than 100% effective or in earnings if the hedge is greater than 100% effective. We employ regression analysis and discounted cash flow analysis to test the effectiveness of our hedges on a quarterly basis. All of our derivative instruments that are designated as hedges are treated as cash flow hedges under SFAS No. 133.
The contracts originated and held by us are fixed rate and, accordingly, we have exposure to changes in interest rates. To protect against potential changes in interest rates affecting interest payments on future securitization transactions, we enter into various hedge agreements. We enter into Euro-dollar futures contracts and forward agreements in order to hedge our future interest payments on our notes payable on automobile secured financing. The market value of these hedge agreements responds inversely to changes in interest rates. Because of this inverse relationship, we can effectively lock in a gross interest rate spread at the time of entering into the hedge transaction. Gains and losses on these agreements are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. Any ineffective portion is recognized in interest expense during that period if the hedge is greater than 100% effective. Upon completion of the securitization transaction, the gains or losses are recognized in full as an adjustment to the gain or loss on the sale of the contracts if the securitization transaction is treated as a sale or amortized on a level yield basis over the duration of the notes issued if the transaction is treated as a secured financing. These hedge instruments are settled daily, and therefore, there are no related financial instruments recorded on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Credit risk related to these hedge instruments is minimal.
As we issued certain variable rate notes payable, we also entered into interest rate swap agreements in order to hedge our variable interest rate exposure on future interest payments. The fair value of the interest rate swap agreements is included in notes payable on automobile secured financing, and any change in the fair value is reported as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Any ineffective portion is recorded in interest expense during that period if the hedge is greater than 100% effective. Related interest income or expense is settled on a quarterly basis and recognized as an adjustment to interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Historically, to protect against market value changes on our MBS portfolio, we entered into various hedge agreements. As part of the adoption of SFAS No. 133, we redesignated these existing agreements from hedges on our MBS portfolio to cash flow hedges that will protect against potential changes in interest rates affecting interest payments on future deposits gathered by us and future securities sold under agreements to repurchase. The fair value of the interest rate swap agreements is included in deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, respectively, and any change in the fair value is reported as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Related interest income or expense is settled on a quarterly basis and is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the period during which cash flows on the hedged items affect income. In conjunction with this redesignation on January 1, 2001, we recorded a transition adjustment to earnings for the $33.7 million unrealized loss on these derivatives offset by an equal amount of unrealized gain on our MBS portfolio.
We also enter into interest rate swap agreements or other derivatives that we choose not to designate as hedges or that do not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133. These derivatives pertain to variable rate notes issued in conjunction with the securitization of our contracts. Any change in the market value of such derivatives and any income or expense recognized on such derivatives is recorded to noninterest income.
F-11
As part of the adoption of SFAS No. 133 in 2001, we recorded a cumulative effect adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) of $4.8 million, net of tax, which represents the deferred loss on our Euro-dollar futures contracts outstanding at January 1, 2001. Of the $4.8 million, $1.8 million was reclassified into earnings during 2001.
Securitization Transactions |
Automobile contract asset-backed securitization transactions are treated as either sales or secured financings for accounting purposes depending upon the securitization structure. In September 2000, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, also known as the FASB, issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, also known as SFAS No. 140, to replace Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 125, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, also known as SFAS No. 125. SFAS No. 140 revises the standards for accounting for securitizations and other transfers of financial assets and collateral and requires certain disclosures, but it generally carries over most of SFAS No. 125s provisions without reconsideration. SFAS No. 140 defines the criteria used to evaluate securitization structures in determining the proper accounting treatment. These criteria pertain to whether or not the transferor has surrendered control over the transferred assets. If a securitization transaction meets all the criteria defined in SFAS No. 140, the transaction is required to be treated as a sale. If any one of the criteria is not met, the transaction is required to be treated as a secured financing. Since March 31, 2000, our securitization transactions included certain provisions which allow us to effectively maintain control over the transferred assets. As a result, these securitization transactions are required to be treated as secured financings. Our securitization transactions prior to March 31, 2000 did not give us this right and, therefore, we were required to treat such transactions as sales.
For securitization transactions treated as sales, we recorded a non-cash gain equal to the present value of the estimated future cash flows on a cash out basis, net of the write-off of dealer participation and gains or losses on hedges. We determined whether or not we must record a servicing asset or liability by estimating future servicing revenues, including servicing fees, late charges, other ancillary income, and float benefit, less the actual cost to service the loans.
In determining the fair value of our retained interest in securitized assets, also known as RISA, we evaluated the cost basis of contracts relative to the fair value of such contracts and the fair value of the RISA recorded. The RISA was capitalized and amortized over the expected life of the underlying contracts. Net interest income and servicing fees earned on these contracts are recognized over the life of the securitization transactions as contractual servicing income, retained interest income and other fee income. The amortization of the RISA was calculated so as to recognize retained interest income on an effective yield basis. These amounts were reported as automobile lending income on our Consolidated Statements of Income.
RISA was classified in a manner similar to available for sale securities and as such was marked to market each quarter. Market value changes were calculated by discounting estimated future cash flows using the current market discount rate. Any changes in the market value of the RISA were reported as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. On a quarterly basis, we evaluated the carrying value of the RISA in light of the actual performance of the underlying contracts and made adjustments to reduce the carrying value, if appropriate.
For securitization transactions treated as secured financings, the contracts are retained on the balance sheet with the securities issued to finance the contracts recorded as notes payable on automobile secured financing. We record interest income on the securitized contracts and interest expense on the notes issued through the securitization transactions.
The excess cash flows generated by securitized contracts are deposited into spread accounts in the name of the trustee under the terms of the securitization transactions. In addition, we advance additional monies to initially fund these spread accounts. For securitization transactions treated as sales, amounts due to us held in the spread accounts and servicing income earned by us for which we have not yet received repayment from the trust are reported as amounts due from trust on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
F-12
As servicer of these contracts, we hold and remit funds collected from the borrowers on behalf of the trustee pursuant to reinvestment contracts that we have entered into for most securitizations. For securitization transactions treated as sales, these amounts are reported as amounts held on behalf of trustee on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
Stock-Based Compensation |
As discussed below, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123, also known as SFAS No. 148, requires expanded disclosure of the effects of a companys accounting policy for stock-based employee compensation. We use the fair value method to account for stock-based employee compensation. See Note 22 Stock Options for further disclosure.
Accounting Pronouncements |
In July 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, also known as SFAS No. 143, in which retirement obligations would be recorded as a liability using the present value of the estimated cash flows and a corresponding amount would be capitalized as part of the assets carrying amount. The capitalized asset retirement cost would be amortized to expense over the assets useful life using a systematic and rational allocation method. The estimate of the asset retirement obligation will change and have to be revised over time. SFAS No. 143 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 143 did not have a material effect on our earnings or financial position.
In June 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, also known as SFAS No. 146, in which liabilities for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized and measured initially at fair value only when the liabilities are incurred. SFAS No. 146 eliminated the recognition of certain costs associated with exit or disposal activities that were previously recognized as liabilities at a plan (commitment) date under Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3 that did not meet the definition of a liability in FASB Concepts Statement No. 6, Elements of Financial Statements. SFAS No. 146 is effective for disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 146 did not have a material effect on our earnings or financial position.
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148. SFAS 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and requires prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the method used on reported results. SFAS No. 148 provides two additional transition methods for entities that adopt Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, also know as SFAS No. 123. Both of these methods avoid the ramp-up effects arising from prospective application of the fair value based method. SFAS No. 148 does not permit the use of the original SFAS No. 123 method of transition for changes to the fair value based method made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2003. This statement also requires disclosure of comparable information for all companies regardless of which method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. SFAS No. 148 improves the timeliness of disclosures by requiring their inclusion in financial reports for interim periods. SFAS No. 148 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. We adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148 on December 31, 2002 and the prospective application method of transition to the fair value based method in the first quarter of 2003. Neither the disclosure adoption nor the accounting adoption had a material effect on our earnings or financial position.
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, also known as FIN No. 46. FIN No. 46 changes the consolidation requirements by requiring a variable interest entity to be consolidated by a company if that company is subject to the majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest entitys activities or entitled to receive a majority of the entitys residual returns or both. In addition, FIN No. 46 requires disclosures about variable interest entities that the company is not required to
F-13
In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, also known as SFAS No. 149. SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. The adoption of SFAS No. 149 did not have a material effect on our earnings or financial position.
In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity, also known as SFAS No. 150. SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). Many of those instruments were previously classified as equity. The adoption of SFAS No. 150 did not have a material effect on our earnings or financial position.
Note 2 | Investment Securities Available for Sale |
Investment securities available for sale consisted of the following:
December 31, 2003 | ||||||||||||
Gross | ||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||
Cost | Gain | Value | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
U.S. government agencies and corporations
|
$ | 50,241 | $ | 252 | $ | 50,493 | ||||||
FHLB securities
|
58,803 | 58,803 | ||||||||||
Other
|
8,446 | 7 | 8,453 | |||||||||
$ | 117,490 | $ | 259 | $ | 117,749 | |||||||
December 31, 2002 | ||||||||||||
Gross | ||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||
Cost | Gain | Value | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
$ | 1,023 | $ | 23 | $ | 1,046 | ||||||
Owner trust certificates
|
3,348 | 3,348 | ||||||||||
FHLB securities
|
46,316 | 46,316 | ||||||||||
Other
|
6,056 | 6,056 | ||||||||||
$ | 56,743 | $ | 23 | $ | 56,766 | |||||||
F-14
At December 31, 2003, the stated maturities of our investment securities available for sale were as follows:
One Year | Five Years | Ten Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
to Five Years | to Ten Years | to Twenty-five Years | No stated maturity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Fair | Amortized | Fair | Amortized | Fair | Amortized | Fair | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost | Value | Cost | Value | Cost | Value | Cost | Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
$ | 179 | $ | 179 | $ | 1,271 | $ | 1,271 | $ | 3,996 | $ | 3,996 | $ | 3,000 | $ | 3,007 | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agencies and corporations
|
50,241 | 50,493 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLB securities
|
58,803 | 58,803 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 50,420 | $ | 50,672 | $ | 1,271 | $ | 1,271 | $ | 3,996 | $ | 3,996 | $ | 61,803 | $ | 61,810 | |||||||||||||||||
Note 3 Mortgage-Backed Securities Available for Sale
MBS available for sale consisted of the following:
December 31, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
GNMA certificates
|
$ | 2,613,962 | $ | 28,607 | $ | 4,484 | $ | 2,638,085 | ||||||||
FNMA participation certificates
|
24,967 | 306 | 25,273 | |||||||||||||
FHLMC participation certificates
|
36,734 | 9 | 78 | 36,665 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
1,774 | 1,774 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 2,677,437 | $ | 28,922 | $ | 4,562 | $ | 2,701,797 | |||||||||
December 31, 2002 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
GNMA certificates
|
$ | 2,562,459 | $ | 46,008 | $ | 1,010 | $ | 2,607,457 | ||||||||
FNMA participation certificates
|
38,647 | 477 | 39,124 | |||||||||||||
FHLMC participation certificates
|
1,046 | 22 | 1,068 | |||||||||||||
Other
|
2,008 | 2,008 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 2,604,160 | $ | 46,507 | $ | 1,010 | $ | 2,649,657 | |||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of MBS available for sale for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 were as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from sales of MBS available for sale
|
$ | 157,828 | $ | 507,839 | ||||||||
Gross realized gains
|
8,423 | 4,020 | ||||||||||
Gross realized losses
|
3,479 |
Our MBS available for sale portfolio had maturities of one month to thirty years at December 31, 2003 and 2002, although payments are generally received monthly throughout the life of these securities.
F-15
Note 4 Net Loans Receivable
Net loans receivable consisted of the following:
December 31, | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||
Consumer:
|
|||||||||
Automobile contracts
|
$ | 10,657,864 | $ | 8,993,266 | |||||
Dealer participation, net of deferred contract
fees
|
175,263 | 154,671 | |||||||
Other
|
6,002 | 7,531 | |||||||
Unearned discounts
|
(61,300 | ) | (91,713 | ) | |||||
10,777,829 | 9,063,755 | ||||||||
Real estate:
|
|||||||||
Mortgage
|
237,668 | 277,233 | |||||||
Construction
|
16,503 | 14,150 | |||||||
254,171 | 291,383 | ||||||||
Undisbursed loan proceeds
|
(17,948 | ) | (8,453 | ) | |||||
236,223 | 282,930 | ||||||||
Commercial
|
124,431 | 97,216 | |||||||
11,138,483 | 9,443,901 | ||||||||
Allowance for credit losses
|
(301,602 | ) | (269,352 | ) | |||||
$ | 10,836,881 | $ | 9,174,549 | ||||||
Loans managed by us totaled $11.0 billion and $9.8 billion as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. We owned all of the $11.0 billion loans managed at December 31, 2003. Of the $9.8 billion loans managed at December 31, 2002, $9.3 billion were owned by us and $525 million were owned by securitization trusts. There were no impaired loans at December 31, 2003 and 2002. Nonperforming loans, or loans on which we have discontinued the accrual of interest income, included in net loans receivable were $53.0 million and $39.2 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Repossessed assets and real estate owned were $10.6 million and $15.7 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and are included in other assets on our Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition.
F-16
Note 5 Allowance for Credit Losses
Changes in the allowance for credit losses were as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year
|
$ | 269,352 | $ | 178,218 | $ | 104,006 | |||||||
Chargeoffs:
|
|||||||||||||
Consumer loans
|
(350,718 | ) | (280,378 | ) | (162,878 | ) | |||||||
Commercial loans
|
(511 | ) | |||||||||||
Mortgage loans
|
(352 | ) | (260 | ) | (1,024 | ) | |||||||
(351,070 | ) | (281,149 | ) | (163,902 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries:
|
|||||||||||||
Consumer loans
|
89,196 | 66,050 | 41,120 | ||||||||||
Commercial loans
|
78 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage loans
|
40 | 17 | |||||||||||
89,314 | 66,050 | 41,137 | |||||||||||
Net chargeoffs
|
(261,756 | ) | (215,099 | ) | (122,765 | ) | |||||||
Provision for credit losses
|
294,006 | 306,233 | 196,977 | ||||||||||
Balance at end of year
|
$ | 301,602 | $ | 269,352 | $ | 178,218 | |||||||
Ratio of net chargeoffs during the period to
average loans owned during the period
|
2.5 | % | 2.6 | % | 2.0 | % | |||||||
Ratio of allowance for credit losses to loans at
the end of the period
|
2.7 | % | 2.9 | % | 2.4 | % |
Note 6 Retained Interest in Securitized Assets
None of our securitization transactions in 2003, 2002 or 2001 were treated as sales. Therefore, we did not record any retained interest in securitized assets.
The following table presents the activity of the RISA:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period
|
$ | $ | 37,392 | $ | 111,558 | |||||||
Additions
|
||||||||||||
Amortization
|
(36,461 | ) | (75,546 | ) | ||||||||
Change in unrealized gain/loss on RISA(1)
|
(931 | ) | 1,380 | |||||||||
Balance at end of period(2)
|
$ | $ | 0 | $ | 37,392 | |||||||
(1) | The change in unrealized gain/loss on RISA represents temporary changes in valuation including changes in the discount rate based on the current interest rate environment. Such amounts will not be realized unless the RISA is sold. Changes in prepayment and credit loss assumptions for the RISA are other than temporary in nature and impact the value of the RISA. Such other than temporary differences are immediately recognized in income as a component of retained interest income or expense. |
(2) | There were no restrictions on the RISA. |
F-17
The balance of contracts 30 days or more delinquent included in securitization trusts totaled $35.2 million at December 31, 2002. Net chargeoffs for these securitization trusts totaled $30.4 million and $50.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Note 7 Premises and Equipment
Premises and equipment consisted of the following:
December 31, | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Land
|
$ | 16,985 | $ | 15,949 | ||||
Buildings and improvements
|
52,522 | 50,738 | ||||||
Computers and software
|
57,626 | 51,780 | ||||||
Furniture and equipment
|
21,110 | 20,037 | ||||||
Other
|
12,478 | 9,092 | ||||||
160,721 | 147,596 | |||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
(78,907 | ) | (68,932 | ) | ||||
$ | 81,814 | $ | 78,664 | |||||
Note 8 Accrued Interest Receivable
Accrued interest receivable consisted of the following:
December 31, | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Interest on loans receivable
|
$ | 67,663 | $ | 62,411 | ||||
Interest on securities
|
13,294 | 15,170 | ||||||
$ | 80,957 | $ | 77,581 | |||||
Accrued interest receivable at December 31, 2003 and 2002 is included in other assets in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
Note 9 Deposits
Deposits consisted of the following:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average Rate for | December 31, | ||||||||||||||
Average Rate at | the Year Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2003(1) | December 31, 2003(2) | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Noninterest bearing deposits
|
| | $ | 210,405 | $ | 165,844 | ||||||||||
Demand deposit accounts
|
0.1 | % | 0.2 | % | 1,145 | 1,037 | ||||||||||
Passbook accounts
|
0.1 | 0.2 | 7,282 | 6,688 | ||||||||||||
Money market deposit accounts
|
1.4 | 1.3 | 963,004 | 730,245 | ||||||||||||
Brokered certificate accounts
|
1.4 | 2.2 | 62,451 | 98,992 | ||||||||||||
Certificate accounts
|
2.0 | 5.8 | 728,569 | 972,178 | ||||||||||||
$ | 1,972,856 | $ | 1,974,984 | |||||||||||||
(1) | Contractual rate. |
(2) | Includes effects of hedging activities. |
F-18
The aggregate amount of certificate accounts in denominations greater than or equal to $100,000 was $220 million and $305 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Deposit amounts in excess of $100,000 are not federally insured.
Scheduled maturities of certificate accounts at December 31, 2003 were as follows:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Amount | Rate | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Six months or less
|
$ | 301,862 | 2.06 | % | ||||
More than six months through one year
|
392,975 | 1.83 | ||||||
More than one year through three years
|
30,097 | 3.00 | ||||||
More than three years through ten years
|
3,635 | 3.78 | ||||||
$ | 728,569 | |||||||
Interest expense on deposits consisted of the following:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Demand deposit accounts
|
$ | 48 | $ | 117 | $ | 70 | ||||||
Passbook accounts
|
16 | 39 | 169 | |||||||||
Money market deposit accounts
|
11,359 | 14,772 | 28,648 | |||||||||
Certificate accounts
|
51,154 | 63,867 | 83,859 | |||||||||
Brokered certificate accounts
|
2,057 | 1,220 | 2,085 | |||||||||
$ | 64,634 | $ | 80,015 | $ | 114,831 | |||||||
Accrued interest payable on deposits at both December 31, 2003 and 2002 was $5.7 million, including accrued interest payable on related interest rate swap agreements, and is included in other liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
The following table summarizes certificate accounts by maturity categories at:
December 31, 2003 | ||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||
2004
|
$ | 694,837 | ||
2005
|
26,890 | |||
2006
|
3,207 | |||
2007
|
3,309 | |||
2008
|
326 | |||
$ | 728,569 | |||
Note 10 | Notes Payable on Automobile Secured Financing |
For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, we issued $5.9 billion and $6.9 billion of notes secured by automobile contracts, of which $5.9 billion and $6.2 billion were through public transactions and no amounts and $775 million, respectively, were through conduit facilities. We had no amount outstanding on the conduit facilities at December 31, 2003 and 2002. We terminated our $775 million conduit facility in May 2002.
Interest payments on the public transactions based on the respective notes interest rate are due either monthly or quarterly, in arrears. Interest payments on the conduit facility were due monthly, in arrears, based on the respective notes interest rate. Interest expense on all notes payable on automobile secured financing,
F-19
The stated maturities of our notes payable on automobile secured financing and their weighted average interest rates, including the effect of interest rate swap agreements on variable rate notes payable, were as follows:
December 31, 2003 | ||||||||
Weighed Average | ||||||||
Amount | Interest Rate | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
2004
|
$ | 429,446 | 1.15 | % | ||||
2005
|
173,365 | 2.14 | ||||||
2006
|
1,497,628 | 2.89 | ||||||
2007
|
2,301,284 | 2.84 | ||||||
2008
|
2,176,795 | 4.03 | ||||||
Thereafter
|
3,676,123 | 3.62 | ||||||
$ | 10,254,641 | 3.30 | % | |||||
Note 11 | Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are summarized as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Balance at end of period
|
$ | 222,489 | $ | 276,600 | ||||
Estimated fair value at end of period
|
222,489 | 276,932 | ||||||
Average amount outstanding during the period
|
220,989 | 222,154 | ||||||
Maximum amount outstanding at any given month-end
during the period
|
273,094 | 356,450 | ||||||
Weighted average interest rate during the period
|
2.0 | % | 2.5 | % | ||||
Weighted average interest rate at end of period
|
1.1 | % | 1.4 | % |
MBS available for sale sold under agreements to repurchase were delivered to dealers who arranged the transactions. The dealers may have sold, loaned, or otherwise disposed of such securities to other parties in the normal course of their operations and have agreed to resell to us substantially identical securities at the maturity of the agreements. At December 31, 2003, we had $118 million and $99.4 million outstanding with our counterparties, Salomon Smith Barney and Nomura Securities Co., Ltd., respectively. At December 31, 2002, we had $220 million and $49.3 million outstanding with our counterparties, Salomon Smith Barney and Nomura Securities Co., Ltd., respectively. The agreements at December 31, 2003 and 2002 mature within 30 days. Average amounts are computed based upon daily ending balances.
Note 12 | Federal Home Loan Bank Advances |
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank are collateralized with eligible real estate loans and MBS. The FHLB advances were collateralized with mortgage loans totaling $147 million and $206 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and MBS totaling $1.1 billion and $1.3 billion at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
F-20
Information as to interest rates and maturities on advances from the FHLB is as follows:
December 31, | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||
Range of interest rates
|
0.9% 7.1 | % | 1.4% 7.1 | % | |||||
Weighted average interest rate
|
1.0 | % | 1.4 | % | |||||
Year due:
|
|||||||||
2003
|
$ | 333,500 | |||||||
2004
|
$ | 326,000 | |||||||
Thereafter
|
2,644 | 2,775 | |||||||
$ | 328,644 | $ | 336,275 | ||||||
We had available credit with the FHLB of approximately $779 million and $1.0 billion at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Note 13 | Other Borrowings |
We have an unsecured line of credit with a bank which has a maximum availability of $30.0 million at both December 31, 2003 and 2002. There was no amount outstanding at both December 31, 2003 and 2002. The line of credit has an interest rate tied to either the Prime rate or the London Interbank Offered Rate, also known as LIBOR, based on our choice. The weighted average interest rate was 3.12%, 4.5%, and 4.0% at December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. There was no interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared with interest expense of $0.1 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Note 14 | Subordinated Debentures |
Subordinated debentures consisted of the following:
December 31, | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Subordinated debentures
|
$ | 400,820 | $ | 408,010 | ||||
Discount and issuance costs
|
(5,966 | ) | (7,449 | ) | ||||
Net subordinated debentures
|
$ | 394,854 | $ | 400,561 | ||||
The subordinated debentures are unsecured and consist of two issuances with outstanding balances of $101 million with an interest rate of 8.875% per annum due in 2007 and $294 million with an interest rate of 9.625% per annum due in 2012. They are redeemable at our option, in whole or in part, on or after August 1, 2004 and May 15, 2009, respectively, both at 100% of the principal amount being redeemed plus accrued interest as of the date of redemption. In addition, the 9.625% debentures may be redeemed in part prior to May 15, 2005, provided at least 65% of the debentures remain outstanding, the redemption is with the proceeds of and within 90 days of an equity issuance by the Bank and the redemption price is not less than 109.625%. For regulatory purposes, the subordinated debentures are included as part of the Banks supplementary capital, subject to certain limitations.
F-21
Note 15 | Commitments and Contingencies |
Future minimum payments under noncancelable operating leases on premises and equipment with terms of one year or more were as follows:
December 31, 2003 | ||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||
2004
|
$ | 6,917 | ||
2005
|
5,901 | |||
2006
|
4,397 | |||
2007
|
3,432 | |||
2008
|
2,435 | |||
Thereafter
|
4,807 | |||
$ | 27,889 | |||
In certain cases, these agreements include various renewal options and contingent rental agreements. Rental expense for premises and equipment totaled $7.4 million, $7.1 million and $6.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Commitments to fund mortgage loans, letters of credit and unused lines of credit were as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Fixed rate loans
|
$ | 100,573 | $ | 98,923 | ||||
Variable rate loans
|
126,140 | 115,651 | ||||||
$ | 226,713 | $ | 214,574 | |||||
Mortgage loans sold with recourse
|
$ | 31,448 | $ | 45,424 | ||||
At December 31, 2003, we had commitments to fund fixed rate loans at rates ranging from 3.88% to 10.09% with loan terms ranging from one month to 200 months.
We have pledged certain assets relative to amounts held on behalf of trustee, including amounts related to securitization transactions treated as secured financings, as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
FNMA participation certificates
|
$ | 19,744 | $ | 30,204 | ||||
GNMA certificates
|
1,058,908 | 692,908 | ||||||
Automobile contracts
|
375,230 | 473,775 | ||||||
Multifamily first mortgages
|
18,680 | 22,834 | ||||||
$ | 1,472,562 | $ | 1,219,721 | |||||
We issued certain MBS that include recourse provisions. Subject to certain limitations, we are required, for the life of the loans, to repurchase the buyers interest in individual loans on which foreclosure proceedings have been completed. Securities with recourse issued by us had a total outstanding balance of $31.4 million and $45.4 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The maximum remaining exposure under these recourse provisions was $31.4 million and $45.4 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. We have pledged approximately $5.0 million of MBS as collateral under these recourse provisions at both December 31, 2003 and 2002.
We have provided for probable losses which can be reasonably estimated that may occur as a result of our recourse obligations. The amount reserved for probable losses on recourse obligations totaled $1.0 million and
F-22
We or our subsidiaries are involved as a party in certain legal proceedings incidental to our business. We do not believe that the outcome of these proceedings will have a material effect upon our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Note 16 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Tax
The following table summarizes the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
December 31, | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||
Unrealized gain on marketable securities
|
$ | 14,771 | $ | 27,145 | |||||
Unrealized loss on interest rate swaps: (1)
|
|||||||||
Deposits
|
(38,297 | ) | (53,081 | ) | |||||
Automobile secured financing
|
(19,539 | ) | (43,624 | ) | |||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
(2,248 | ) | (3,092 | ) | |||||
(60,084 | ) | (99,797 | ) | ||||||
Realized loss on settled cash flow hedges: (1)
|
|||||||||
Deposits
|
(9,539 | ) | (11,367 | ) | |||||
Automobile secured financing
|
(11,889 | ) | (17,531 | ) | |||||
(21,428 | ) | (28,898 | ) | ||||||
Total other accumulated comprehensive loss
|
$ | (66,741 | ) | $ | (101,550 | ) | |||
(1) | All cash flow hedges are structured to hedge future interest payments on deposits or borrowings. |
Note 17 Comprehensive income
The following table presents the components of comprehensive income, net of related tax, for the periods indicated:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 123,605 | $ | 79,718 | $ | 55,690 | ||||||
Unrealized (losses) gains on securities
available
for sale, net of tax |
(7,315 | ) | 28,605 | 12,309 | ||||||||
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax
|
(21,285 | ) | (135,422 | ) | (75,048 | ) | ||||||
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses on
securities available for sale, net of tax
|
(5,058 | ) | (3 | ) | 1,050 | |||||||
Reclassification adjustment for losses on cash
flow hedges included in income, net of tax
|
68,467 | 66,176 | 15,599 | |||||||||
Comprehensive income
|
$ | 158,414 | $ | 39,074 | $ | 9,600 | ||||||
Note 18 Equity Offerings
We completed common stock offerings in July 2003 and November 2003 in which we raised a total of $163 million and $207 million through the issuance of 6.1 million and 6.3 million additional common shares at a price of $28.00 and $34.39 per share, respectively. With the completion of these offerings, our total number of common shares issued and outstanding increased 31.6% to 51.7 million shares at December 31, 2003.
F-23
We completed rights offerings in March 2002 and May 2001 in which we raised $51.3 million and $61.0 million through the issuance of 3.3 million and 3.7 million additional common shares at a price of $15.75 and $16.25 per share, respectively. With the completion of the March 2002 offering, our total number of common shares issued and outstanding increased 9.1% to 39.1 million shares at March 31, 2002, compared with an increase of 12% to 35.7 million shares in May 2001.
WFS completed rights offerings in March 2002 and May 2001 that raised a total of $110 million and $116 million through the issuance of 6.1 million and 6.4 million additional common shares at a price of $18.00 and $18.25 per share, respectively. With the completion of the March 2002 offering, the number of WFS common shares issued and outstanding increased by 18% to 41.1 million shares, compared with an increase of 22% to 35.0 million shares in May 2001.
Of the 6.1 million and 6.4 million additional common shares issued by WFS in 2002 and 2001, the Bank purchased 5.2 million and 5.3 million shares in the amount of $94.4 million and $96.5 million, respectively. The net amount of proceeds received from WFS and our rights offerings executed in March 2002 and May 2001 totaled $67.3 million and $80.6 million, respectively. At December 31, 2003, the Bank owned 84% of WFS common stock.
Note 19 Dividends
We paid cash dividends of $0.51, $0.47 and $0.43 per share for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. There are no restrictions on the payment of dividends by Westcorp.
Our wholly owned subsidiary, the Bank, is restricted by regulation and by the indentures relating to its subordinated debentures as to the amount of funds which can be transferred to us in the form of dividends. Under the most restrictive of these terms, on December 31, 2003, the Banks restricted shareholders equity was $467 million with a maximum dividend of $218 million.
The Bank must notify the Office of Thrift Supervision, also known as the OTS, of its intent to declare cash dividends thirty days before declaration and may not make a loan to us for any purpose to the extent we engage in any activities not permitted for a bank holding company.
Note 20 Automobile Lending Income
Automobile lending income consisted of the following components:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Fee income
|
$ | 90,511 | $ | 81,087 | $ | 67,579 | ||||||
Contractual servicing income
|
10,735 | 23,018 | ||||||||||
Retained interest expense, net of RISA
amortization
|
(29,490 | ) | (27,839 | ) | ||||||||
Total automobile lending income
|
$ | 90,511 | $ | 62,332 | $ | 62,758 | ||||||
Fee income consists primarily of documentation fees, late charges and deferment fees. According to the terms of each securitization transaction, we earn contractual servicing income on the outstanding balance of contracts securitized.
Note 21 Employee Benefit Plans
We have various employee benefit plans, which vary on the types of associates covered and the benefits received. These plans include the Westcorp Employee Stock Ownership and Salary Savings Plan, the Executive Deferral Plan, and the Long Term Incentive Plan.
The Westcorp Employee Stock Ownership Plan, also known as the ESOP, covers essentially all associates who have completed six months of service, excluding contract or temporary employees. Contributions to the ESOP are discretionary and determined by the Board of Directors within limits set forth
F-24
The Executive Deferral Plan, also known as the EDP, covers a select group of our management or highly compensated associates as determined by our Board of Directors. The EDP is designed to allow participants to defer a portion of their compensation on a pre-tax basis and earn tax-deferred interest on these deferrals. The EDP also provides for us to match portions of the amounts contributed by our associates at the discretion of our Board of Directors. For the year ended December 31, 2003, expense related to the EDP for us and our subsidiaries totaled $2.1 million compared with $0.7 million and $0.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
The Long Term Incentive Plan, also known as the LTIP, covers certain key executive officers in which such officers will be entitled to receive a fixed incentive amount provided that our tangible net book value per common share as of December 31, 2004 equals or exceeds $28.08, as adjusted at our sole discretion, and the executive officer remains continuously employed by us or our subsidiaries through April 30, 2005. We expensed $0.9 million, $0.8 million and $0.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, related to the LTIP.
Note 22 Stock Options
In May 2001, we adopted the 2001 Westcorp Stock Option Plan, also known as the 2001 Plan, an incentive stock option plan for certain associates and directors. The 2001 Plan replaced the 1991 Stock Option Plan, also known as the 1991 Plan, that expired on April 15, 2001. Those who received options prior to the approval of the 2001 Plan are still subject to the 1991 Plan and may continue to exercise the remaining shares that are outstanding and exercisable, however, any and all shares reserved for the 1991 Plan are no longer available for future grants. As such, no further grants will be made under the expired 1991 Plan.
Under the 2001 Plan, we reserved a total of 3,000,000 shares of common stock for future issuance. As of December 31, 2003, a total of 2,185,750 shares were available for future grants. The options may be exercised within seven years after the date of the grant. Additionally, the weighted average life of the options outstanding at December 31, 2003 was 3.97 years and the exercise prices ranged from $9.94 to $20.41 per share.
F-25
Options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2003 were as follows:
Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Weighted Average | Weighted Average | Number | Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercise Prices | Outstanding | Remaining Life | Exercise Price | Exercisable | Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 9.00 10.00 | 750 | 1.62 | $ | 9.94 | 750 | $ | 9.94 | ||||||||||||||
12.00 13.00 | 187,786 | 2.00 | 12.62 | 187,786 | 12.62 | |||||||||||||||||
13.00 14.00 | 194,000 | 3.14 | 13.25 | 131,717 | 13.25 | |||||||||||||||||
15.00 16.00 | 1,000 | 3.86 | 15.25 | 750 | 15.25 | |||||||||||||||||
17.00 18.00 | 284,500 | 4.15 | 17.32 | 125,125 | 17.32 | |||||||||||||||||
18.00 19.00 | 784,500 | 4.57 | 18.57 | 74,375 | 18.30 | |||||||||||||||||
19.00 20.00 | 5,000 | 5.60 | 19.85 | 1,250 | 19.85 | |||||||||||||||||
20.00 21.00 | 3,000 | 5.85 | 20.41 | 750 | 20.41 | |||||||||||||||||
1,460,536 | 3.97 | $ | 16.86 | 522,503 | $ | 14.74 | ||||||||||||||||
Stock option activity is summarized as follows:
Weighted Average | |||||||||
Shares | Exercise Price | ||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2001
|
820,715 | $ | 12.94 | ||||||
Granted
|
444,250 | 17.37 | |||||||
Exercised
|
(113,834 | ) | 12.68 | ||||||
Forfeited
|
(74,317 | ) | 14.76 | ||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2001
|
1,076,814 | 14.67 | |||||||
Granted
|
414,500 | 18.33 | |||||||
Exercised
|
(143,251 | ) | 13.29 | ||||||
Forfeited
|
(180,625 | ) | 16.06 | ||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2002
|
1,167,438 | 15.91 | |||||||
Granted
|
444,000 | 18.78 | |||||||
Exercised
|
(126,424 | ) | 14.84 | ||||||
Forfeited
|
(24,478 | ) | 17.19 | ||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2003
|
1,460,536 | $ | 16.86 | ||||||
Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Our stock options have characteristics significantly different from traded options, and changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate. In 2002 and 2001, we utilized the Black-Scholes option valuation model to determine the fair value of the options granted. During 2003, we decided to utilize the Binomial option valuation model for all stock options expensed as part of our implementation of SFAS No. 148 as we feel it provides a better measure of value for companies that pay dividends. In addition, in 2003 we utilized the Binomial option valuation model to value all outstanding options, including those granted prior to 2003. In our opinion, neither of these models necessarily provides a reliable single measure of the fair value of our employee stock options. Nonetheless, the fair value of options granted in 2003, 2002, and 2001 was estimated with the following assumptions:
December 31, | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Risk-free interest rate
|
2.2 | % | 3.4 | % | 4.7 | % | ||||||
Expected dividend
|
0.45 | |||||||||||
Volatility factor
|
0.46 | 0.31 | 0.40 | |||||||||
Expected option life
|
3 years | 7 years | 7 years |
F-26
The weighted average fair value of options granted during the year ended December 31, 2003 was $5.48 compared to $6.11 for the options granted during the year ended December 31, 2002.
Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is required by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS No. 148, and has been determined as if we had accounted for our employee stock options under the fair value method of that statement. We adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148 on December 31, 2002 and the prospective application method of transition to the fair value based method of accounting for stock options in the first quarter of 2003.
Pro forma net income and diluted earnings per share for the respective periods were as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per | |||||||||||||
share amounts) | |||||||||||||
Net income, as reported
|
$ | 123,605 | $ | 79,718 | $ | 55,690 | |||||||
Add: Stock-based employee compensation
expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects |
404 | ||||||||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects |
1,225 | 858 | 800 | ||||||||||
Pro forma net income
|
$ | 122,784 | $ | 78,860 | $ | 54,890 | |||||||
Earnings per share
|
|||||||||||||
Basic as reported
|
$ | 2.88 | $ | 2.07 | $ | 1.62 | |||||||
Basic pro forma
|
$ | 2.86 | $ | 2.04 | $ | 1.60 | |||||||
Earnings per share
|
|||||||||||||
Diluted as reported
|
$ | 2.85 | $ | 2.05 | $ | 1.61 | |||||||
Diluted pro forma
|
$ | 2.83 | $ | 2.03 | $ | 1.59 | |||||||
Note 23 Income Taxes
Income tax expense consisted of the following:
For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Current
|
|||||||||||||
Federal
|
$ | 95,316 | $ | 72,144 | $ | 74,383 | |||||||
State
|
20,222 | 14,127 | 10,123 | ||||||||||
115,538 | 86,271 | 84,506 | |||||||||||
Deferred:
|
|||||||||||||
Federal
|
(14,467 | ) | (24,816 | ) | (38,623 | ) | |||||||
State
|
(2,796 | ) | (9,188 | ) | (4,208 | ) | |||||||
(17,263 | ) | (34,004 | ) | (42,831 | ) | ||||||||
$ | 98,275 | $ | 52,267 | $ | 41,675 | ||||||||
F-27
A reconciliation of total tax provisions and the amounts computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 35% to income before tax is as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Tax at statutory rate
|
$ | 86,780 | $ | 50,601 | $ | 37,707 | ||||||
State tax (net of federal tax benefit)(1)
|
11,327 | 3,211 | 3,844 | |||||||||
Other
|
168 | (1,545 | ) | 124 | ||||||||
$ | 98,275 | $ | 52,267 | $ | 41,675 | |||||||
(1) | State tax for 2002 includes the result of a one-time benefit of legislation enacted by the State of California which eliminated the use of the reserve method of accounting for bad debts for large banks and financial corporations for taxable income purposes for tax years after January 1, 2002. |
Deferred taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Amounts previously reported as current and deferred income tax expense have been reclassified. Such changes to the components of the expense occur because all tax alternatives available to us are not known for a number of months subsequent to year end.
Significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
December 31, | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||
Deferred tax assets:
|
|||||||||
Reserves for credit losses
|
$ | 108,183 | $ | 94,482 | |||||
State tax deferred benefit
|
5,351 | 5,241 | |||||||
Deferred compensation accrual
|
7,158 | 4,007 | |||||||
Tax basis difference marketable
securities and derivatives
|
57,861 | 91,543 | |||||||
Other, net
|
13,276 | 13,272 | |||||||
Total deferred tax assets
|
191,829 | 208,545 | |||||||
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|||||||||
Loan fee income deferred for tax purposes
|
(107 | ) | (529 | ) | |||||
FHLB dividends
|
(7,947 | ) | (7,259 | ) | |||||
Accelerated depreciation for tax purposes
|
(10,339 | ) | (4,120 | ) | |||||
Loan costs
|
(428 | ) | (321 | ) | |||||
Deferred taxes on unrealized gains
|
(9,847 | ) | (18,375 | ) | |||||
Tax basis difference mortgage-backed
securities
|
(17,817 | ) | (20,685 | ) | |||||
Other, net
|
(20,637 | ) | (24,658 | ) | |||||
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
(67,122 | ) | (75,947 | ) | |||||
Net deferred tax assets
|
$ | 124,707 | $ | 132,598 | |||||
F-28
Note 24 Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The estimated fair values of our financial instruments were as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Carrying | |||||||||||||||||
Amounts | Fair Value | Amounts | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||
Financial assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks
|
$ | 91,082 | $ | 91,082 | $ | 84,215 | $ | 84,215 | ||||||||||
Restricted cash
|
245,399 | 245,399 | 71,763 | 71,763 | ||||||||||||||
Other short-term investments
|
291,000 | 291,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Investment securities and MBS
|
2,819,546 | 2,819,546 | 2,706,423 | 2,706,423 | ||||||||||||||
Loans receivable
|
11,138,483 | 12,004,390 | 9,443,901 | 10,456,167 | ||||||||||||||
Financial instrument agreements held for purposes
other than trading:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreements
|
(115,529 | ) | (115,529 | ) | (194,590 | ) | (194,590 | ) | ||||||||||
Financial liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
1,972,856 | 1,965,945 | 1,974,984 | 1,984,247 | ||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
222,489 | 222,489 | 276,600 | 276,932 | ||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings
|
9,046 | 9,049 | 5,891 | 5,897 | ||||||||||||||
Notes payable on automobile secured financing
|
10,254,641 | 10,511,044 | 8,494,678 | 8,743,888 | ||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
328,644 | 328,644 | 336,275 | 333,679 | ||||||||||||||
Amounts held on behalf of trustee
|
177,642 | 177,642 | ||||||||||||||||
Subordinated debentures
|
394,854 | 395,699 | 400,561 | 418,947 |
The methods and assumptions used in estimating the fair values of our financial instruments are included in Note 1.
Note 25 Financial Instrument Agreements
Our interest rate swap agreements are with counterparties to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed rate and floating rate interest amounts calculated by reference to an agreed notional amount and a specified index. We pay a fixed interest rate and receive a floating interest rate on all of our interest rate swap agreements. At December 31, 2003 and 2002, the terms of our interest rate swaps were to pay a weighted average fixed rate of 4.5% and 4.8% and to receive a weighted average variable rate of 1.4% and 1.6%, respectively, with expiration dates ranging from 2004 to 2011 and collateral requirements generally ranging from 3% to 4%. Variable interest rates may change in the future.
Notional amounts do not represent amounts exchanged with other parties and, therefore, are not a measure of our exposure to loss through our use of these agreements. The amounts exchanged are determined by reference to the notional amounts and the other terms of the agreements.
The current credit exposure under these agreements is limited to the fair value of the agreements with a positive fair value at the reporting date. Master netting agreements are arranged or collateral is obtained through physical delivery of, or rights to, securities to minimize our exposure to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to financial instruments. We use only highly rated counterparties and further reduce our risk by avoiding any material concentration with a single counterparty.
For the year ended December 31, 2003, the unrealized loss on cash flow hedges was $21.3 million, net of taxes of $14.2 million, compared with $135 million, net of taxes of $94.1 million, for the year ended
F-29
Note 26 Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||
Basic:
|
||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 123,605 | $ | 79,718 | $ | 55,690 | ||||||
Average basic common shares outstanding
|
42,867,262 | 38,588,710 | 34,277,856 | |||||||||
Net income per common share basic
|
$ | 2.88 | $ | 2.07 | $ | 1.62 | ||||||
Diluted:
|
||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 123,605 | $ | 79,718 | $ | 55,690 | ||||||
Average basic common shares outstanding
|
42,687,262 | 38,588,710 | 34,277,856 | |||||||||
Stock option adjustment
|
709,949 | 333,901 | 207,271 | |||||||||
Average diluted common shares outstanding
|
43,397,211 | 38,922,611 | 34,485,127 | |||||||||
Earnings per common share diluted
|
$ | 2.85 | $ | 2.05 | $ | 1.61 |
Options to purchase 26,000 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $18.20 to $18.69 per share were outstanding at December 31, 2001 but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares and therefore, the effect would be antidilutive.
F-30
Note 27 Regulatory Capital
At December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Office of Thrift Supervision categorized the Bank as well capitalized. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum capital ratios as set forth in the table below. The Banks capital is subject to review by federal regulators for the components, amounts, risk weighting classifications and other factors. There are no conditions or events since December 31, 2003 that we believe have changed the Banks category.
The following table summarizes the Banks actual capital and required capital as of December 31, 2003 and 2002:
Tier 1 | |||||||||||||||||
Tangible | Core | Risk-Based | Risk-Based | ||||||||||||||
Capital | Capital | Capital | Capital | ||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2003
|
|||||||||||||||||
Actual Capital:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
$ | 884,536 | $ | 884,536 | $ | 881,517 | $ | 1,357,744 | |||||||||
Capital ratio
|
7.06 | % | 7.06 | % | 9.20 | % | 14.17 | % | |||||||||
FIRREA minimum required capital:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
$ | 187,923 | $ | 375,845 | N/A | $ | 766,665 | ||||||||||
Capital ratio
|
1.50 | % | 3.00 | % | N/A | 8.00 | % | ||||||||||
Excess
|
$ | 696,313 | $ | 508,691 | N/A | $ | 591,079 | ||||||||||
FDICIA well capitalized required capital:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
N/A | $ | 626,409 | $ | 574,999 | $ | 958,332 | ||||||||||
Capital ratio
|
N/A | 5.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||
Excess
|
N/A | $ | 258,127 | $ | 306,518 | $ | 399,412 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2002
|
|||||||||||||||||
Actual Capital:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
$ | 728,631 | $ | 728,631 | $ | 655,142 | $ | 1,143,345 | |||||||||
Capital ratio
|
6.43 | % | 6.43 | % | 7.67 | % | 13.38 | % | |||||||||
FIRREA minimum required capital:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
$ | 169,991 | $ | 339,981 | N/A | $ | 683,481 | ||||||||||
Capital ratio
|
1.50 | % | 3.00 | % | N/A | 8.00 | % | ||||||||||
Excess
|
$ | 558,640 | $ | 388,650 | N/A | $ | 459,864 | ||||||||||
FDICIA well capitalized required capital:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
N/A | $ | 566,635 | $ | 512,611 | $ | 854,351 | ||||||||||
Capital ratio
|
N/A | 5.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||
Excess
|
N/A | $ | 161,996 | $ | 142,531 | $ | 288,994 |
F-31
The following table reconciles the Banks equity to the Banks tangible, core and risk-based capital:
December 31, | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||
Bank shareholders equity GAAP
basis
|
$ | 685,045 | $ | 532,902 | |||||
Adjustments for tangible and core capital:
|
|||||||||
Unrealized losses under SFAS No. 115 and
SFAS No. 133
|
68,203 | 94,220 | |||||||
Non-permissible activities
|
(146 | ) | (157 | ) | |||||
Minority interest in equity of subsidiaries
|
131,434 | 101,666 | |||||||
Total tangible and core capital
|
884,536 | 728,631 | |||||||
Adjustments for risk-based capital:
|
|||||||||
Subordinated debentures(1)
|
355,370 | 380,314 | |||||||
General loan valuation allowance(2)
|
120,857 | 107,889 | |||||||
Low-level recourse deduction
|
(3,019 | ) | (73,489 | ) | |||||
Risk-based capital
|
$ | 1,357,744 | $ | 1,143,345 | |||||
(1) | Excludes capitalized discounts and issue costs. |
(2) | Limited to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. |
Note 28 | Westcorp (Parent Company Only) Financial Information |
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
December 31, | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 287,730 | $ | 8,420 | ||||||
Investment in subsidiaries
|
847,447 | 617,598 | ||||||||
Other
|
129 | 4,258 | ||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 1,135,306 | $ | 630,276 | ||||||
Liabilities
|
||||||||||
Other liabilities
|
$ | 2,952 | $ | 3,495 | ||||||
Total liabilities
|
2,952 | 3,495 | ||||||||
Shareholders equity
|
1,132,354 | 626,781 | ||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
$ | 1,135,306 | $ | 630,276 | ||||||
F-32
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Income:
|
|||||||||||||
Dividends from subsidiaries
|
$ | 19,250 | $ | 16,100 | $ | 60,100 | |||||||
Interest income
|
251 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest income
|
29 | ||||||||||||
Total income
|
19,530 | 16,100 | 60,100 | ||||||||||
Expense:
|
|||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
138 | 620 | |||||||||||
Noninterest expense
|
1,298 | 5,071 | 3,536 | ||||||||||
Total expense
|
1,298 | 5,209 | 4,156 | ||||||||||
Income before income taxes and equity in net
income of subsidiaries
|
18,232 | 10,891 | 55,944 | ||||||||||
Income tax benefit
|
(369 | ) | (2,087 | ) | (1,623 | ) | |||||||
Income before equity in net income of subsidiaries
|
18,601 | 12,978 | 57,567 | ||||||||||
Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries
|
105,230 | 67,698 | 10,860 | ||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 123,831 | $ | 80,676 | $ | 68,427 | |||||||
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 123,831 | $ | 80,676 | $ | 68,427 | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
|
|||||||||||||
Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries
|
(105,230 | ) | (67,698 | ) | (10,860 | ) | |||||||
Other, net
|
4,256 | (927 | ) | (2,127 | ) | ||||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
22,857 | 12,051 | 55,440 | ||||||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|||||||||||||
Capital contribution to subsidiary
|
(93,050 | ) | (29,700 | ) | (94,000 | ) | |||||||
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
(93,050 | ) | (29,700 | ) | (94,000 | ) | |||||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|||||||||||||
Decrease in short-term borrowings
|
(20,000 | ) | (2,300 | ) | |||||||||
Dividends paid
|
(21,607 | ) | (18,042 | ) | (15,000 | ) | |||||||
Issuance of common stock
|
371,110 | 52,866 | 62,141 | ||||||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
349,503 | 14,824 | 44,841 | ||||||||||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
|
279,310 | (2,825 | ) | 6,281 | |||||||||
Cash at beginning of year
|
8,420 | 11,245 | 4,964 | ||||||||||
CASH AT END OF YEAR
|
$ | 287,730 | $ | 8,420 | $ | 11,245 | |||||||
F-33
Note 29 | Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited) |
The following is a summary of unaudited quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. Certain quarterly amounts have been adjusted to conform with the year-end presentation.
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 31 | June 30 | September 30 | December 31 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
2003
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest income
|
$ | 307,862 | $ | 309,562 | $ | 310,911 | $ | 316,682 | ||||||||
Interest expense
|
141,572 | 135,637 | 130,048 | 124,179 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
166,290 | 173,925 | 180,863 | 192,503 | ||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses
|
79,884 | 68,036 | 73,150 | 72,936 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest income
|
27,753 | 27,731 | 27,833 | 26,840 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest expense
|
68,439 | 72,657 | 66,745 | 73,947 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes
|
45,720 | 60,963 | 68,801 | 72,460 | ||||||||||||
Income taxes
|
18,226 | 23,975 | 27,343 | 28,731 | ||||||||||||
Income before minority interest
|
27,494 | 36,998 | 41,458 | 43,729 | ||||||||||||
Minority interest in earnings of subsidiaries
|
3,945 | 5,385 | 12,123 | 4,611 | ||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 23,549 | $ | 31,603 | $ | 29,335 | $ | 39,118 | ||||||||
Earnings per common share basic
|
$ | 0.60 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 0.65 | $ | 0.82 | ||||||||
Earnings per common share diluted
|
$ | 0.60 | $ | 0.80 | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.80 | ||||||||
2002
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest income
|
$ | 262,196 | $ | 280,008 | $ | 299,006 | $ | 301,730 | ||||||||
Interest expense
|
120,070 | 133,111 | 139,976 | 137,759 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
142,126 | 146,897 | 159,030 | 163,971 | ||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses
|
65,698 | 62,350 | 80,996 | 97,189 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest income
|
17,159 | 20,732 | 26,410 | 26,352 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest expense
|
60,859 | 64,774 | 62,207 | 63,466 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes
|
32,728 | 40,505 | 42,237 | 29,668 | ||||||||||||
Income taxes
|
12,964 | 15,185 | 16,824 | 7,294 | ||||||||||||
Income before minority interest
|
19,764 | 25,320 | 25,413 | 22,374 | ||||||||||||
Minority interest in earnings of subsidiaries
|
2,911 | 3,612 | 3,740 | 2,890 | ||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 16,853 | $ | 21,708 | $ | 21,673 | $ | 19,484 | ||||||||
Earnings per common share basic
|
$ | 0.46 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.50 | ||||||||
Earnings per common share diluted
|
$ | 0.46 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.49 | ||||||||
Note 30 | Subsequent Events (Unaudited) |
On February 25, 2004, we declared a cash dividend of $0.14 per share for shareholders of record as of May 4, 2004, with a payable date of May 18, 2004.
On February 27, 2004, we completed the issuance of $1.5 billion of notes secured by contracts through a securitization transaction accounted for as a secured financing. The senior notes issued are credit enhanced through the issuance of subordinated notes.
F-34
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||||
No. | Description of Exhibit | |||
3 | .1 | Articles of Incorporation(11) | ||
3 | .1.1 | Certificate of Amendment of the Articles of Incorporation of Westcorp | ||
3 | .2 | Bylaws(11) | ||
4 | .1 | Indenture dated as of July 25, 1997 issued by Western Financial Bank, formerly Western Financial Savings Bank, F.S.B., with respect to $150,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of 8.875% Subordinated Capital Debentures due 2007(7) | ||
4 | .2 | Indenture dated as of May 3, 2002 issued by Western Financial Bank, formerly Western Financial Savings Bank, F.S.B., with respect to $300,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of 9.625% Subordinated Capital Debentures due 2012(8) | ||
10 | .1 | Amended and Restated 1991 Stock Option Plan of Westcorp(10) | ||
10 | .2 | Westcorp 2001 Stock Option Plan(9) | ||
10 | .3 | 2000 Executive Deferral Plan V(8) | ||
10 | .3.1 | First Amendment to the Westcorp Executive Deferral Plan V, dated as of April 1, 2003(10) | ||
10 | .4 | Amended and Restated Tax Sharing Agreement between Westcorp And its subsidiaries, dated September 30, 2002(9) | ||
10 | .4.1 | First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Tax Sharing Agreement, Dated as of January 1, 2003(10) | ||
10 | .4.2 | Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Tax Sharing Amendment, dated August 1, 2003(10) | ||
10 | .5 | Master Reinvestment Contract between WFS Financial Inc and Western Financial Bank, F.S.B., dated May 1, 1995(1) | ||
10 | .6 | Amendment No. 1, dated as of June 1, 1995, to the Restated Master Reinvestment Reimbursement Agreement(5) | ||
10 | .7 | Amended and Restated Master Collateral Assignment Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2000(6) | ||
10 | .8 | Form of WFS Financial Inc Dealer Agreement(10) | ||
10 | .9 | Form of WFS Financial Inc Loan Application(10) | ||
10 | .10 | Amended and Restated Westcorp Employee Stock Ownership and Salary Savings Plan, dated January 1, 2001(8) | ||
10 | .10.1 | Amendment No. 1, dated as of January 1, 2001, to Amended and Restated Westcorp Employee Stock Ownership and Salary Savings Plan(8) | ||
10 | .10.2 | Amendment No. 2, dated as of January 1, 2001, to Amended and Restated Westcorp Employee Stock Ownership and Salary Savings Plan(8) | ||
10 | .10.3 | Amendment No. 3, dated as of January 1, 2001, to Amended and Restated Westcorp Employee Stock Ownership and Salary Savings Plan(10) | ||
10 | .10.4 | Amendment No. 4, dated as of January 1, 2001, to Amended and Restated Westcorp Employee Stock Ownership and Salary Savings Plan(10) | ||
10 | .10.5 | Amendment No. 5, dated as of January 1, 2001, to Amended and Restated Westcorp Employee Stock Ownership and Salary Savings Plan(10) | ||
10 | .10.6 | Amendment No. 6, dated as of November 1, 2003, to Amended and Restated Westcorp Employee Stock Ownership and Salary Savings Plan | ||
10 | .10.7 | Amendment No. 7, dated as of December 1, 2003, to Amended and Restated Westcorp Employee Stock Ownership and Salary Savings Plan | ||
10 | .11 | Amended and Restated WFS 1996 Incentive Stock Option Plan(2) | ||
10 | .12 | Amended and Restated Allocation Agreement, dated March 31, 2003(10) | ||
10 | .12.1 | First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Allocation Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2003(10) |
Exhibit | ||||
No. | Description of Exhibit | |||
10 | .12.2 | Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Allocation Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2003(10) | ||
10 | .13 | Employment Agreement(3)(4) | ||
10 | .14 | Logo License Agreement between Western Financial Bank, Westcorp, WFS Financial Inc, Western Consumer Products, WFS Receivables Corporation, WFS Receivables Corporation 2, WFS Receivables Corporation 3, WFS Financial Auto Loans, Inc., The Hammond Company, The Mortgage Bankers, WFS Funding Inc., WFS Investments, Inc., Westran Services Corporation, WestFin Insurance Agency, Inc., Western Auto Investments, Inc., Western Consumer Services, Inc., Westhrift Life Insurance Entity, Inc., Western Reconveyance Entity, Inc., and WFS Web Investments, Inc.(9) | ||
10 | .14.1 | First Amendment to the Logo and License Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2003(10) | ||
10 | .15 | Travel Services Agreement between Westran Services Corporation and Westcorp, Western Financial Bank, WFS Financial Inc, and Westfin Insurance Agency, Inc., dated August 28, 2002(9) | ||
10 | .15.1 | First Amendment to the Travel Services Agreement, dated July 16, 2003(10) | ||
10 | .17 | Interest Rate Swap Guarantee Agreement, dated May 10, 2001(10) | ||
10 | .17.1 | First Amendment to the Interest Rate Swap Guarantee Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2003(10) | ||
21 | .1 | Subsidiaries of Westcorp | ||
23 | .1 | Consent of Independent Auditors, Ernst & Young LLP | ||
31 | .1 | CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
31 | .2 | CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
32 | .1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
32 | .2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
(1) | Exhibits previously filed with WFS Financial Inc Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-93068), filed August 8, 1995 incorporated herein by reference under Exhibit Number indicated. | |
(2) | Exhibit previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the WFS Financial Inc Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-40121), filed November 13, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(3) | Employment Agreement dated February 27, 1998 between WFS Financial Inc, Westcorp and Lee A. Whatcott (will be provided to the SEC upon request). | |
(4) | Employment Agreement, dated November 15, 1998 between the WFS Financial Inc, Westcorp and Mark Olson (will be provided to the SEC upon request). | |
(5) | Exhibits previously filed with Annual Report on Form 10-K of WFS Financial Inc for the year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 33-93068) as filed on or about March 31, 1999. | |
(6) | Exhibits previously filed with WFS Registration Statements on Form S-2 (File No. 333-91277) filed November 19, 1999 and subsequently amended on January 20, 2000 incorporated by reference under Exhibit Number indicated. | |
(7) | Exhibit previously filed with Western Financial Bank, formerly Western Financial Bank, F.S.B., Offering Circular with the OTS, dated July 25, 1997 (will be provided to the SEC upon request). | |
(8) | Exhibit previously filed with Annual Report on Form 10-K of Westcorp for the year ended December 31, 2001 as filed on or about March 29, 2002. | |
(9) | Exhibit previously filed with Annual Report on Form 10-K of Westcorp for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed on or about March 28, 2003. |
(10) | Exhibit previously filed with Westcorp Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-110244) filed November 5, 2003 and subsequently amended on November 10, 2003 incorporated by reference under Exhibit Number indicated. | |
(11) | Exhibit previously filed with Westcorp Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-34286) filed April 11, 1990, incorporated herein by reference under Exhibit Numbers indicated. |