Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2003

OR

Commission File No. 0-22183

MEADE INSTRUMENTS CORP.

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (949) 451-1450

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value Per Share

(Title of Class)

     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

     As of May 15, 2003, there were 19,806,026 outstanding shares of the Registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“common stock”), which is the only class of common stock of the Registrant. As of May 15, 2003 the aggregate market value of the shares of common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, computed based on the closing sale price of $2.90 per share as reported by Nasdaq, was approximately $28 million.

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12(b).2 of the Exchange Act).

Documents Incorporated by Reference

     Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after February 28, 2003, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1. Business

General

     Meade Instruments Corp. is a multinational consumer optics company that designs, manufactures, imports and distributes telescopes, telescope accessories, binoculars, riflescopes, microscopes and other optical products. Meade is dedicated to bringing innovative, cutting-edge, consumer-friendly products to the consumer optics marketplace. That dedication to bringing consumers the broadest offering of consumer optical products led to the Company’s acquisition of Simmons Outdoor Corp. (“Simmons”) in October 2002. Simmons, a highly-regarded and well-known designer and distributor of riflescopes and binoculars, offers complete binocular and riflescope product lines under the Simmons®, Weaver® and Redfield® brand names. With Simmons, Meade has expanded its presence in the sporting goods market, a market the Company has not significantly penetrated in the past. Meade’s dedication to product innovation and brand recognition has led to the successful introduction of a wide range of products — products such as the Meade CaptureView™, a binocular with an integrated digital camera introduced in early fiscal 2003 that contributed over $15 million to net sales in its first year on the market. The Company believes that it offers not only the broadest and most complete line of telescopes and telescope accessories available but also, with the acquisition of Simmons, one of the broadest, most complete and most highly respected lines of riflescopes, binoculars and spotting scopes for the sports optics enthusiast. The Company offers hundreds of different telescope, riflescope and binocular models as well as hundreds of accessory products for consumer telescope and sports optics buyers. The Company’s telescopes range in aperture from under 2 inches to 16 inches and in retail price from less than $100 to more than $15,000. The Company offers several families of riflescopes and binoculars under its brand names at retail price points from about $10 to more than $500. Whether a consumer is a serious amateur astronomer, an avid naturalist or someone just looking for a good binocular, Meade offers a complete range of quality products to satisfy almost any desire the consumer optics buyer may have.

     Founded in 1972, Meade has a decades-long reputation for providing the amateur astronomer with technically sophisticated products at competitive prices. Combining its manufacturing expertise with its dedication to innovation, quality and value, Meade has developed and produced some of the industry’s most technologically advanced consumer telescopes at affordable prices. Although professional and institutional applications of Meade’s telescopes are not Meade’s primary market, the Company’s Schmidt-Cassegrain telescopes are used by many universities, scientific laboratories and aerospace companies throughout the world. The Company has capitalized on its brand name recognition among serious amateur astronomers and its ability to bring advanced technology to lower price points to market successfully its less-expensive telescopes to beginning and intermediate amateur astronomers. Meade is a major supplier of telescopes to such retailers as Discovery Channel Stores (formerly The Nature Company), Aldi (Germany), Wal-Mart, and Sam’s Club.

     Meade was sold by its founder and then-current Chief Executive Officer to an investor group in 1986. It was reacquired by the Company’s senior management in 1991. After the reacquisition, management emphasized a business plan that concentrated on new product development, securing a reliable supplier of less-expensive telescopes, effective targeted marketing and customer service. To those ends the Company committed $3.0 million, $2.2 million and $2.1 million to research and development during fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and has, over the last five fiscal years, committed $9.7 million in the aggregate to research and development. These research and development expenditures were centered on the development of technologically advanced less-expensive telescopes, new products for the general consumer and sports optics markets as well as product improvement and industrial applications of the Company’s existing technologies.

     Meade manufactures a complete line of advanced astronomical telescopes in Irvine, California, including the production of all of the advanced optical systems, which are critical components of telescopes. Many of the Company’s less-expensive telescopes and its binoculars and riflescopes are manufactured under proprietary designs by manufacturers located in Asia, including mainland China, Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan. The Company also sources component parts for small to midrange telescopes and related accessories from several suppliers in mainland China, Taiwan, Japan and Korea. These parts are assembled into finished products in the Company’s wholly-owned Mexican assembly plant (See Item 2. Properties).

1

Table of Contents

     The Company complements its efforts in new product development with an aggressive marketing plan. The Company’s marketing plan includes print advertising in astronomy, outdoor and hunting related magazines and, at times, in general consumer magazines. The marketing plan also includes extensive co-operative advertising campaigns with many of the Company’s key retail partners, as well as point-of-sale marketing displays. In addition, Meade publishes comprehensive, full-color, high-quality product catalogs that provide significant product exposure for a broad range of consumers including the serious amateur astronomer, the avid birder, the weekend sports enthusiast or hunter.

     On September 1, 1999 the Company acquired 100% of the stock and equity interests in Bresser Optik GmbH & Co. KG, and Bresser Optik Geschaftsfuhrung und Verwaltungs GmbH (collectively “Bresser”), for $5.0 million in cash and 201,830 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at approximately $2.0 million. Bresser is a German distributor of binoculars, telescopes, microscopes and other consumer optical products. Bresser has provided the Company greater distribution opportunities for the Company’s products. Moreover, Bresser’s significant presence in the binocular and low-priced telescope market in Europe has strengthened the Company’s penetration into these markets. In January 2000, the Company also purchased what was formerly its German distributor for approximately $1.1 million cash.

     On October 25, 2002 the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common stock of Simmons Outdoor Corp. for $20,829,000 cash ($16,000,000 was paid at close; the balance was paid in December, 2002). Simmons, a designer and distributor of riflescopes, binoculars and other consumer sports optics offers products under the Simmons, Weaver and Redfield brand names. To fund a portion of the purchase price, the Company sold 3,291,801 shares of its common stock in a private placement for net cash proceeds of $7,344,000. The balance of the purchase price was funded through borrowings on the Company’s bank line of credit.

     In the United States and Canada, the Company distributes its products through a network of more than 500 specialty retailers, distributors and mass merchandisers, which offer Meade’s products in more than 3,000 retail store locations. The Company also sells certain of its telescope models to selected national mail order dealers. In addition to products sold through Meade Europe (formerly Bresser) channels, Meade sells its products internationally through a network of over 30 foreign distributors, many of which service dealer locations in their respective countries. Revenues from customers outside North America were $27.2 million for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2003, and accounted for approximately 24.5% of the Company’s net sales for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2003 (See Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). The Company intends to continue to pursue an integrated strategy of product line expansion, aggressive marketing, and expansion of the Company’s domestic and international distribution networks.

     The Company continues to pursue industrial applications for its technologies and its product development and manufacturing capabilities. To that end, Meade announced, during fiscal 2002, several relationships with companies involved in free-space optics communication technologies and digital imaging applications in the scientific research and medical diagnostic equipment markets. Several of those companies have since ceased doing business. Meade’s principal source of revenue in the industrial marketplace is the sale of digital CCD imagers used in a life sciences research system manufactured and sold by the Eastman Kodak Company’s Scientific Imaging Systems group (based in Rochester, NY and New Haven, CT). However, sales to Eastman Kodak amounted to less than 1% of net sales for the year ended February 28, 2003. While Meade continues to pursue industrial applications for its technologies, the Company does not believe sales of products into such markets will contribute meaningfully to the Company’s sales and profitability for the foreseeable future.

Recent Developments

     On April 21, 2003, the Company announced that John C. Diebel will resign as the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer effective May 31, 2003. Steven G. Murdock will become Chief Executive Officer and retain his position as President. Harry L. Casari, a current member of the Company’s Board of Directors, will become Chairman of the Board of Directors. Mr. Diebel remains a member of the Board of Directors.

     In connection with Mr. Diebel’s resignation, the Company and Mr. Diebel have entered into a Transition Agreement pursuant to which, among other matters, Mr. Diebel has agreed to serve as a consultant to the Company until May 31, 2004.

2

Table of Contents

Industry Overview

     Market-size data for the consumer optics industry are difficult to obtain because nearly all of the companies in the industry are privately held. The Company believes the overall size of the consumer optics market is driven, in part, by the introduction of new products.

     The Company offers products at numerous price points in the consumer optics market, from advanced astronomical telescopes, state-of-the-art riflescopes and cutting-edge binoculars with integrated digital cameras to less-expensive telescopes for beginning amateur astronomers and low-priced binoculars for the casual observer.

     The advanced astronomical telescope market is characterized by frequent technological developments, including the relatively recent introduction of electronic and computer-aided features. Serious amateur astronomers demand that the optical, electronic and mechanical performance of the telescopes and accessories they purchase be of very high quality. These advanced telescopes continue to drive the technological advances specifically in the telescope industry and generally in the consumer optics industry.

     Telescopes are generally offered in three different optical configurations: (a) refracting telescopes, which use a lens at the upper end of the optical tube to collect light; (b) reflecting telescopes, which use a concave mirror as the primary optical element; and (c) catadioptric (mirror-lens) telescopes, which employ a combination of mirrors and lenses to form the image. Each type has its own advantages: refractors are easy to maintain, yield sharp images and are relatively inexpensive in smaller apertures; reflectors generally are the lowest-cost means of purchasing larger apertures and are well suited to the intermediate amateur astronomer; and mirror-lens telescopes are more portable in larger apertures.

     The binocular market is typically characterized less by technological developments than by styling, features and price. However, Meade believes its introduction of the CaptureView binocular with an integrated digital camera demonstrates that innovation can drive binocular sales as well. Among the first to market with the concept of an integrated binocular/digital camera, Meade’s CaptureView offered a quality integrated product at an attractive retail price (only $99 at most retail outlets in the U.S.) The principal features considered by binocular buyers include: (1) the diameter of the objective lenses, which serve to collect light, (2) the types of prisms used to right the visual image — either porro prisms (which give some binoculars the familiar zig-zag profile) or roof prisms that permit straight line designs, and (3) the magnification, or power, of the optical system. A binocular’s field of view, anti-reflective lens coatings and eye relief are also considered by consumers buying binoculars. Binoculars typically range in size from mini binoculars that generally have objective lenses not larger than 26mm to professional-level binoculars that can support objective lenses exceeding 60mm in diameter. Binocular retail prices range from under $10 to several thousand dollars. Meade binoculars, offered under the Meade, Bresser, Simmons, Weaver and Redfield brand names, generally sell for between $15 and $400 at retail.

     The riflescope (and pistolscope) market demands a product that is rugged, absolutely waterproof and unerringly accurate. Like the binocular and telescope markets, features, styling and price are prime motivators in the riflescope market. Brand reputation is also a critical element in the riflescope consumer’s buying decision. The principal features considered by rifle and pistol scope buyers include: (1) light gathering ability and light transmission which are principally dependent on the diameter of the objective lens and the effectiveness of the anti-reflective coatings applied to the various lens surfaces in the scope, (2) waterproof/fogproof/shockproof integrity and durability of construction, (3) eye relief, which measures the distance from the shooter’s eye to the surface of the ocular lens, (4) ease of adjustment for windage and elevation and (5) magnification – riflescopes typically offer variable magnification but come in fixed magnifications as well. Rifle and pistol scopes are sized by the diameter of the objective lens, which typically ranges from 20mm to 50mm, and are priced from under $30 to nearly $2,000 at retail. Meade rifle and pistol scopes, offered under the Simmons, Weaver and Redfield brand names, generally sell for between $30 and $600 at retail.

     Meade believes that it is uniquely positioned in the marketplace to capitalize on its strong family of brand names, its research and development resources, its history of innovation and its manufacturing capabilities, to bring new and innovative products to the consumer and sports optics markets.

3

Table of Contents

Competitive Strengths

     Meade believes that it derives significant benefits from its position as a leading designer and distributor of telescopes, binoculars, riflescopes, microscopes and other optical related products. These benefits include its ability to offer its customers one of the most innovative, broadest product lines available, embodying both high quality and value. The Company attributes its success to the following competitive strengths:

     New Products/Research and Development. Meade places a primary emphasis on product innovation and quality through its research and development efforts. The Company employs an in-house engineering staff that develops new products for the broad spectrum of markets the Company sells into as well as technological advances and improvements to existing products. The Company is able to obtain additional benefits by out-sourcing certain research and development services to supplement its internal expertise. Meade believes that the members of its senior level management are among the most experienced in the telescope industry. The Company, its management and its employees are dedicated to the goal of producing technically superior yet price-competitive products and have been responsible for some of the consumer optics industry’s most technically advanced, easy to use, consumer telescopes, binoculars and riflescopes.

     Broad Line of Products. The Company has pursued a strategy in which it uses the tremendous advancements in microprocessor technology to building on its existing know-how in advanced telescope design and operation to bring computer technology and features to telescopes at lower and lower price points. Through its acquisitions of Bresser in 1999, and Simmons in 2002, the Company has expanded its product lines to include a wide variety of binoculars and telescopes under the Bresser brand name (a well-known and respected brand in Germany and throughout Europe) and complete lines of riflescopes, pistolscopes and binoculars under the Simmons, Weaver and Redfield brand names. As a result, the Company offers hundreds of different telescope, riflescope and binocular models with several different optical configurations, as well as hundreds of accessory products for the consumer telescope and sports optics buyers. The Company’s telescopes range in aperture from under 2 to 16 inches and in retail price from less than $100 to more than $15,000. The Company offers several families of riflescopes and binoculars under its several brand names at retail price points from about $10 to more than $500. Whether a consumer is a serious amateur astronomer, an avid hunter or someone just looking for a good binocular, Meade offers a complete range of quality products to satisfy almost any desire the consumer optics buyer may have.

     Optical Systems Expertise. Meade has made substantial investments to develop an expertise in optical engineering, providing it with the ability to produce high quality optics on-site in Irvine, California. Meade employs highly skilled opticians who use sophisticated manufacturing techniques and equipment, including specialized optical polishing machines and vacuum-coating machines, to produce what the Company believes to be the highest quality optics available in the more advanced consumer telescope market. Meade uses its optical engineering expertise to ensure that the optics in its foreign-sourced telescopes, binoculars and riflescopes meet the strictest of standards.

     Quality Control. Meade’s manufacturing and engineering personnel coordinate the manufacturing process in order to ensure that product quality is maintained at a high level within an efficient cost structure. The Company has in place quality controls covering all aspects of the manufacturing process of its products, from each product’s precision optical system to its final assembly and testing. Certain of the Company’s less expensive and mid-range telescope models and accessories are assembled at the Company’s assembly plant located in Tijuana, Mexico. The Company manufactures the majority of its high-end advanced telescopes in its manufacturing facility in Irvine, California, while many of the Company’s less-expensive telescopes, and its binoculars and riflescopes are produced for the Company by manufacturers located in the Far East, principally mainland China, Taiwan, Japan and the Philippines. Meade regularly sends product and design engineers to the Far East to monitor the manufacturing processes at the various plants that produce its telescopes, telescope components, binoculars, riflescopes and accessories. Meade also regularly commits at least one of its United States based quality control engineers to the Far East.

     Broad Distribution Network. The Company’s sales force in the U.S. and in Germany works closely with specialty retailers, distributors and mass merchandisers on product quality, technical knowledge and customer

4

Table of Contents

service. Meade expanded its distribution network with the acquisition of Simmons. Simmons distributes its products, inside and outside the U.S., principally through mass merchandisers and distributors in the sporting goods marketplace. Meade did not have significant presence in the sporting goods marketplace prior to the acquisition of Simmons. Meade has its own on-site graphic arts departments to work with specialty retailers, distributors and mass merchandisers to produce print advertising, hang-tags for displays within retail outlets and other point-of-sale support. This capability provides the Company’s customers with a comprehensive marketing program to assist in their sales efforts. As a result of these efforts, Meade has become a major supplier of telescopes, binoculars and riflescopes to such retailers as Discovery Channel Store (formerly The Nature Company), Aldi (Germany), Wal-Mart, Sam’s Club and Jerry’s Sport Center. Meade Europe also has continued to expand Meade’s international presence.

     Superior Customer Service. Meade believes that its high levels of customer service and technical support are important factors that differentiate it from its competitors. In an effort to provide each of the Company’s customers with post-sale service and to relieve them of the burden of such service, Meade has established multiple dedicated toll-free telephone numbers so that its customers and end users can call the Company’s support personnel with any questions relating to its products. In addition to giving its customers personal attention, the Company believes that providing this toll-free assistance also reduces product returns by better educating first-time users about telescope, binocular and riflescope operation. In addition, in an effort to simplify assembly of the Company’s products, Meade pre-assembles a substantial portion of its telescopes prior to packaging.

Products

     Meade has developed and expanded its product line to include a full line of telescopes and accessories for the beginning, intermediate and serious amateur astronomer. The Company offers a complete line of binoculars from small aperture theater glasses to full-size waterproof roof-prism glasses and the Company’s recently introduced CaptureView binocular with an integrated digital camera. The Company’s product offerings also include a complete line of riflescopes from the lower-to-moderate priced Simmons and Redfield lines to the higher priced precision scopes in the Weaver line. Moreover, in addition to adding new products, the Company continually refines and improves its existing products. Certain of Meade’s products are described in greater detail below:

     Advanced Astronomical Telescopes. Among the Company’s most sophisticated products are its LX series Schmidt-Cassegrain and Maksutov-Cassegrain telescopes, which incorporate an optical system that provides high-quality resolution, contrast and light transmission. The LX series offers the serious amateur astronomer a broad range of products, from the attractively priced Autostar-controlled LX90, to the state-of-the-art LX200GPS line. The LX200GPS telescopes, available in 7, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16-inch apertures, are the most popular of the Company’s telescopes among serious amateur astronomers. The LX200GPS telescopes feature a Global Positioning System (“GPS”) receiver for automatic telescope alignment and a built-in computer library of more than 145,000 celestial objects. These objects are cataloged in the Company’s proprietary hand-held computerized Autostar II control system. By entering any of the celestial objects presented on the Autostar II display, the telescope automatically locates and tracks the selected object. Advanced telescopes also include the Company’s LXD55 series. The LXD55 series offers the more serious amateur a wide variety of advanced features on larger aperture telescopes at economical prices. The advanced astronomical telescopes collectively represented approximately 3% of telescope units shipped and approximately 21% of the Company’s net sales for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2003.

     Entry-Level Telescopes. Designed specifically for the beginning to intermediate amateur astronomer or terrestrial observer, the Company’s less-expensive 60mm to 114mm refracting, reflecting and spotting telescopes and the ETX series telescopes include many of the features of the more advanced telescopes at economical prices. With the NG and NGC series of telescopes (the “NG telescopes”) and the Digital Electronic Series telescopes (the “DS telescopes”), with apertures ranging from 60mm to 114mm, and the ETX series, with apertures ranging from 70mm to 125mm, some of the most sophisticated features of the Company’s advanced telescopes are made available at some of the Company’s lowest retail price points. Equipped with the hand-held Autostar Computer Controller, the ETX series and the DS telescopes can find and track any one of one thousand or more celestial objects at the push of a button. The Autostar, with its “go to” capability, brought to the general consumer for prices starting at a few hundred dollars, features that had previously been available only on the most sophisticated high-end telescopes selling for thousands of dollars. The Company offers several variations of its small refracting and reflecting telescopes (including its traditional models, the NG telescopes and the DS telescopes) for distribution on a semi-exclusive

5

Table of Contents

basis to specific specialty retailers. These telescope models comprise the lower-price end of the Company’s telescope product line. Sales of entry-level telescopes comprised approximately 97% of the Company’s telescope units shipped and approximately 36% of the Company’s net sales for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2003.

     Binoculars. The Company expanded its market presence in binoculars with the acquisition of Simmons in 2002 and Bresser in 1999. The Simmons brands are widely recognized in the sports optics marketplace as quality products at competitive prices. The Bresser name is equally well recognized in Germany and other countries in Europe as a quality supplier of a wide range of binoculars. Binocular sales accounted for well over one half of the Company’s sales attributed to Germany during fiscal 2003. The Company also sells a complete line of consumer binoculars through its existing domestic distribution network under the Meade brand name, including the Company’s CaptureView, a binocular with an integrated digital camera. The binoculars sold by the Company are purchased from manufacturers outside the United States. Binocular sales, comprising over one million units in fiscal 2003, represented approximately 24% of the Company’s net sales for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2003.

     Rifle and pistol scopes. The Company expanded its product offerings to include riflescopes and pistolscopes with the acquisition of Simmons in October 2002. Simmons sells riflescopes under the Simmons, Weaver and Redfield brand names. Riflescope sales accounted for most of the Company’s sales attributed to Simmons during fiscal 2003. The riflescopes sold by the Company are purchased from manufacturers outside the United States. Riflescopes represented approximately 8% of the Company’s net sales for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2003.

     Accessories. The Company also offers accessories for each of its principal product lines that range from additional eyepieces and celestial observation software for telescopes to bore sighters for riflescopes. Approximately 250 telescope accessory products are currently available from the Company. Sales of accessories represented approximately 9% of the Company’s net sales for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2003. Other miscellaneous products such as industrial optical and digital imaging products, microscopes and other consumer optical products accounted for approximately 2% of the Company’s net sales for fiscal 2003.

Sales and Marketing

     The Company’s telescopes, binoculars, riflescopes, microscopes and accessories are sold through a domestic network of mail order dealers, specialty retailers, distributors and mass merchandisers. Internationally, the Company’s products are sold through its wholly owned subsidiary in Germany to specialty retailers and mass merchandisers and through a network of foreign distributors and dealers in other countries around the world. The Company’s high-end telescopes are generally sold through mail order dealers or single and multiple-location specialty retailers. Meade’s less-expensive telescopes are sold in similar venues but are sold principally through mass merchandisers. The Company’s binoculars and riflescopes are sold principally through a network of domestic distributors, as well as through specialty retailers and mass merchandisers. The Company maintains direct contact with its larger dealers and its domestic and foreign distributors through the Company’s sales professionals. A network of independent representatives is used to maintain contact with its smaller specialty retailers. Included among the Company’s customers are the following retail outlets, mass merchandisers and foreign distributors: Discovery Channel Stores (formerly The Nature Company), Wal-Mart, Aldi (Germany), MIC International Corp. (Japan), Sam’s Club and Jerry’s Sport Center. For additional information about geographic areas, see Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

     The Company’s sales force works closely with its dealers, specialty retailers, distributors and mass merchandisers on product quality, technical knowledge and customer service. The Company employs approximately thirty-seven persons in sales and customer service positions in the U.S. and Europe, all of whom have significant industry experience. These individuals advise the Company’s specialty retailers about the quality features of the Company’s products and provide answers to questions from specialty retailers as well as directly from end users of the Company’s products. The Company stresses service to both its customers and end users by providing marketing assistance in the form of hang-tags, catalog layouts and other print media as well as dedicated toll free customer service telephone numbers. In addition to giving its customers personal attention, the Company believes toll free telephone numbers also help reduce the number of product returns from end users who are generally unfamiliar with the assembly and operation of telescopes, binoculars and riflescopes. The Company’s dedication to providing a high level of customer service is one factor that management believes sets Meade apart from its competition.

6

Table of Contents

     The Company’s telescope products are regularly advertised in most major domestic and international telescope and astronomy-related magazines and periodicals with comprehensive, full color, technically informative advertisements which present a consistent message of innovation and quality about the Company and its products. Innovation and quality is also the theme in the Simmons advertising and marketing programs. The Simmons brands are regularly advertised in several of the most widely circulated hunting and outdoors consumer magazines. The Company also focuses advertising dollars on point-of-sale promotions and displays in partnership with its retail customers to cooperatively market the Company’s products to the end consumer.

     Throughout fiscal 2003, the Company sold its products to mail order dealers, to distributors and to more than 600 specialty retailers and mass merchandisers that offer Meade’s products in more than 11,000 retail store outlets. During fiscal 2003, Wal-Mart (including Sam’s Club) and Discovery Channel Store (“DCS”, formerly The Nature Company), accounted for approximately 15% and 11% of the Company’s net sales, respectively. During fiscal 2002, Wal-Mart (including Sam’s Club) and DCS, accounted for approximately 13% and 11% of the Company’s net sales, respectively. During fiscal 2001, DCS accounted for approximately 13% of the Company’s net sales. The Company’s ten largest customers, in the aggregate, accounted for approximately 49% of the Company’s net sales in fiscal 2003. The loss of, or the failure to replace, any significant portion of the sales made to any significant customer could adversely affect results of operations of the Company to the extent the Company did not replace any such lost sales with increased sales to existing or new customers.

Operations

     Materials and Supplies. The Company purchases high grade optical glass in order to avoid imperfections that can degrade optical performance. Lenses and mirrors for the Company’s domestically manufactured telescopes are individually polished and hand-figured by master opticians to achieve a high level of resolution. The Company purchases metal telescope components from numerous foundries, metal stamping and metal working companies. Certain of the Company’s products contain computerized drive systems and other electronic circuitry. The components of these computerized drive and electronic systems are purchased from various suppliers and are generally assembled by third party vendors.

     Polishing and Hand Figuring. After a Schmidt-Cassegrain, Maksutov-Cassegrain, ED-refractor or Schmidt-Newtonian glass surface is fine ground, the mirror or lens is polished for up to 16 hours to obtain full transmission or reflectivity. It is at this point that the Company’s opticians perform the final lens or mirror shaping (a process called figuring).

     Optical Testing. As each of the Company’s ED-refractors, Maksutov-Cassegrain optical sets, Schmidt-Cassegrain optical sets, or parabolic Newtonian primary mirrors progress through the grinding, polishing and hand-figuring stages of development, they are repeatedly tested and re-tested for irregularities, smoothness of figure and correction.

     Optical Alignment and Centration. Finished, individually-matched Maksutov-Cassegrain and Schmidt-Cassegrain optical sets and matched ED-refractor doublet objective lenses are sent to the optical alignment and centration department, where each optical set is placed into a special optical tube that permits rotation of the optical elements about their optical axes. With optimal orientation fixed, each optics set is placed into machined housings of an optical tube or collimation lens cell. The optical system is once again tested and only after passing this final test is an optical tube system ready to be used.

     The Company works closely with factories in the Far East developing proprietary telescope, binocular and riflescope designs and ensuring that the manufacturing processes result in products that meet the Company’s quality standards. Meade maintains relationships with several suppliers in the Far East in order to diversify its supply. Most of those suppliers are located in mainland China. Many of the Company’s telescopes, telescope components and accessories, binoculars and riflescopes purchased during fiscal 2003 were supplied by these Chinese manufacturers. The Company owns many of the key designs, molds and dies used by the Far-Eastern suppliers. Meade regularly sends product and design engineers to the Far-East to monitor the manufacturing processes at the various plants that produce its products and accessories. Meade also regularly commits at least one of its United States based quality control engineers to the Far East.

7

Table of Contents

     In fiscal year 2000 the Company began an assembly operation in a 26,000 sq. ft. building located in Tijuana, Mexico (the “Mexico Facility”). In December 1999, the Mexico Facility was expanded to approximately 50,000 sq. ft. At February 28, 2003, this facility employed approximately 135 people engaged in the assembly of several products including less-expensive and mid-range telescopes, electronic sub-assemblies, and accessory products.

Competition

     The telescope, binocular and riflescope industries are highly competitive and sensitive to consumer needs and preferences. In the telescope market, Meade competes in the United States and Canada with Celestron International, Inc. (“Celestron”), and Bushnell Performance Optics, Inc. (“Bushnell”) and, to a lesser extent, with other significantly smaller companies which service niche markets. In Europe and Japan, the Company competes primarily with Celestron, Vixen Optical Industries, Ltd., and with other smaller regional telescope importers and manufacturers. Some of the Company’s current and potential competitors in the telescope market may possess greater financial or technical resources and competitive cost advantages due to a number of factors, including, without limitation, lower taxes and substantially lower costs of labor associated with manufacturing. In May 2002, Celestron transferred certain of its assets in an assignment for the benefit of creditors proceeding. Those assets were sold in June 2002 to a new Celestron entity, Celestron Acquisition LLC.

     The binocular and riflescope markets are generally more competitive than the telescope market with a greater number of competitors at each price point. In the binocular market, the Company competes primarily with Bushnell, Nikon Inc., Canon Inc., Minolta Camera, Co., Ltd., Pentax Corporation and various smaller manufacturers and resellers. In the riflescope market, the Company competes primarily with Bushnell, Leupold & Stevens, Inc., BSA Optics, Inc., Burris Company and Kahles GmbH. Many of these competitors in the binocular and riflescope market have significantly greater brand name recognition and financial and technical resources than those of the Company, and many have long-standing positions, customer relationships and established brand names in their respective markets.

Employees

     As of February 28, 2003, Meade had approximately 500 full-time employees. The Company believes that it offers competitive compensation and other benefits and that its employee relations are good. None of the Company’s United States-based employees is represented by a union. The Company’s employees at the Mexico Facility are represented by a union. The success of the Company’s future operations depends in large part on the Company’s ability to attract and retain highly skilled technical, marketing and management personnel. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in attracting and retaining such key personnel.

     In order to enable its employees to share in the Company’s growth and prosperity, Meade established the Meade Instruments Corp. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “ESOP”), effective March 1, 1996. The ESOP provides participating United States-based employees an opportunity to receive beneficial ownership of Meade’s common stock.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

     Set forth below are the names, ages, titles and present and past positions of the persons serving as executive officers of the Company as of May 15, 2003:

8

Table of Contents

     John C. Diebel founded Meade Instruments Corp. in 1972. He has been the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company for the majority of the time since December 1975. Prior to founding the Company, Mr. Diebel worked as an engineer for TRW Inc. and Hughes Aircraft Co. Mr. Diebel graduated from the California Institute of Technology with BS and MS degrees in electrical engineering and received a Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Southern California. On April 21, 2003, the Company announced that John C. Diebel will resign as the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer effective May 31, 2003. Mr. Diebel remains a member of the Board of Directors.

     Steven G. Murdock, a director of the Company since April 1996, has been the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer since October 1990 and the Company’s Secretary since April 1996. From May 1980 to October 1990, Mr. Murdock was the Company’s Vice President of Optics. From November 1968 to May 1980, Mr. Murdock worked as the optical manager for Coulter Optical, Inc., an optics manufacturer. Mr. Murdock received a BS degree in business administration from California State University at Northridge. In connection with Mr. Diebel’s resignation as Chief Executive Officer, Steven G. Murdock will become Chief Executive Officer and retain his position as President.

     Joseph A. Gordon, Jr., a director of the Company since April 1996, has been the Company’s Senior Vice President — North American Sales since June 1995. From December 1984 to June 1995, he worked as the Company’s Vice President — North American Sales. From January 1981 to December 1984, Mr. Gordon was the Vice President of Sales at Celestron. Mr. Gordon received a BS degree in marketing from the University of Cincinnati.

     Brent W. Christensen has been the Company’s Senior Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer since March 1, 2002. Mr. Christensen was the Company’s Vice President — Finance from June 1995 and Chief Financial Officer from April 1996. From August 1993 to June 1995, he worked as the Company’s controller. Mr. Christensen is a Certified Public Accountant, and from January 1985 to August 1993, he worked as an audit manager with Ernst & Young LLP. Mr. Christensen received a BA degree in business administration from California State University at Fullerton.

     Mark D. Peterson has been the Company’s Senior Vice President and General Counsel since March 1, 2002. Mr. Peterson was the Company’s Vice President and General Counsel from October 1997. From October 1991 to October 1997, Mr. Peterson was an attorney with O’Melveny & Myers LLP, specializing in corporate and securities law. Mr. Peterson received a BS degree in accounting from Brigham Young University and a JD degree from the University of California — Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law.

     Robert L. Davis has been the Company’s Senior Vice President — Corporate Development since March 1, 2003. Mr. Davis was the Company’s Vice President and Assistant General Counsel from December 1999. From September 1996 to December 1999, Mr. Davis was an attorney with O’Melveny & Myers LLP, specializing in corporate and securities law. From August 1994 to September 1996 he worked as an attorney with Morrison & Foerster LLP, specializing in corporate finance and labor and employment law. Mr. Davis received a BA degree in English and a JD degree from Brigham Young University.

Item 2. Properties

     During fiscal 2003, the Company leased a 161,000 square foot manufacturing, distribution and corporate facility and a 42,000 square foot warehouse both of which are located in Irvine, California. The manufacturing, distribution and corporate facility lease expires in 2007. The warehouse lease expired in March 2003 and the Company vacated the premises as of April 1, 2003. Simmons leases a 96,000 square foot distribution facility in Thomasville, Georgia that includes 6,000 square feet of office space. The Simmons lease expires in December 2007. The Company leases 45,000 square feet of warehouse space in Meridian, Mississippi on a month-to-month basis. The Company also leases a 50,000 square foot assembly plant in Tijuana, Mexico. The Tijuana lease expires in 2004 with three, five-year options. The Company owns a 30,000 square foot office and distribution facility located in Borken, Germany. The Company also leases a 1,200 square foot office space, in Graefelfing, Germany with a cancellation notice period of 6 months to the end of any calendar year. The Company leases office space in Florida for a sales employee, which lease expires in July 2003. The Company’s management believes that all facilities occupied by the Company are adequate for present requirements, and that the Company’s current equipment is in good condition and suitable for the operations involved.

9

Table of Contents

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

     On October 17, 2001, the Company filed suit against Tasco Sales, Inc. (“Tasco”) and Celestron International, Inc. (“Celestron”), charging the two companies with patent infringement and unfair competition. The complaint, filed in the United States District Court, Central District of California, Southern Division (Case No. SA-CV 01-976 (GLT)), alleges that Tasco and Celestron willfully infringed Meade’s Patent No. 6,304,376, entitled “Fully Automated Telescope System With Distributed Intelligence.” In addition to seeking compensation for damages incurred, including enhanced damages, the suit seeks to enjoin Tasco and Celestron from continuing to manufacture or sell products that infringe Meade’s patent. On or around November 7, 2001, the defendants filed an answer, subsequently amended, to the complaint in which it denied the Company’s allegations and set forth various affirmative defenses. On or around November 19, 2001, Defendants filed a counterclaim, also subsequently amended, against the Company for declaratory judgment of non-infringement of the Company’s patent, for declaratory judgment that the Company’s patent is unenforceable and invalid, and for claims that the Company is infringing a Celestron design patent, U.S. Patent No. D438,221, and Celestron’s trade dress. The counterclaim further alleges that the Company has willfully infringed Celestron’s design patent and seeks an unspecified amount of damages, enhanced damages, and an injunction and other unspecified relief against the Company. However, Celestron recently dismissed its design-patent counterclaim with prejudice as to Meade products on sale up to that time. On February 28, 2003, a partial Summary Judgment issued in favor of Celestron in which the Court held that Celestron did not literally infringe Meade’s ‘376 patent. On May 23, 2003, a further partial Summary Judgment issued in favor of Celestron in which the Court held that Celestron did not infringe Meade’s ‘376 patent under the doctrine of equivalents. Meade is currently evaluating its options with respect to an appeal of these rulings. Due to the uncertainties of litigation, the Company is unable to provide an evaluation of the likelihood of either a favorable or unfavorable outcome in these cases.

     On June 4, 2002, the Company filed suit against Celestron, Tasco and other related or affiliated parties charging the defendant with patent infringement. The complaint, (“the ‘799 lawsuit”) filed in the United States District Court, Central District of California, Southern Division (Case No. SA CV 02-544 (GLT)), alleges that the defendants willfully infringed Meade’s Patent No. 6,392,799, entitled “Fully Automated Telescope System With Distributed Intelligence.” The patent covers the Company’s “level the telescope and point it North” alignment technology (the “Telescope Alignment Technology”), which allows a telescope user to easily align a computer operated telescope. In addition to seeking compensation for damages incurred, including enhanced damages, the suit seeks to enjoin Tasco, Celestron and the other defendants from continuing to manufacture or sell products that infringe Meade’s telescope alignment patent. On December 16, 2002, the District Court denied Meade’s motion. The Company intends to continue to vigorously assert the ‘799 patent against Celestron, Tasco, and the other defendants and to vigorously defend against their counterclaims. Due to the uncertainties of litigation, the Company is unable to provide an evaluation of the likelihood of either a favorable or unfavorable outcome in this case.

     On June 7, 2002, the Company filed suit against Celestron, Tasco and other related or affiliated parties, charging the defendants with correction of patent inventorship, false and misleading representations in violation of the Lanham Act, unfair competition and fraudulent business practices. The complaint, (“the ‘942 lawsuit) filed in the United States District Court, Central District of California, Southern Division (Case No. SA-CV 02-558 (GLT)), alleges that the defendants misappropriated the Company’s Telescope Alignment Technology and subsequently conspired to obtain United States Patent No. 6,369,942, entitled “Auto-alignment tracking telescope mount” (“the ‘942 Patent”), by fraudulently representing themselves as the inventors and owners of the Telescope Alignment Technology. In addition to other remedies, the suit seeks to establish that the Company invented the Telescope Alignment Technology and that equitable and legal title to the ‘942 Patent should be vested in the Company. Due to the uncertainties of litigation, the Company is unable to provide an evaluation of the likelihood of either a favorable or unfavorable outcome in this case.

     On November 21, 2002, Celestron filed an action alleging that Meade products infringe United States Patent No. 6,467,738 entitled “Tripod Structure for Telescopes.” The complaint seeks injunctive relief, compensatory and treble damages in an unspecified amount, and attorneys’ fees and costs. Meade has filed an answer denying all claims in Celestron’s complaint. Celestron also filed a motion for a preliminary injunction based on its patent. Meade opposed Celestron’s motion. On December 16, 2002, the District Court denied Celestron’s motion. Due to the uncertainties of litigation, the Company is unable to provide an evaluation of the likelihood of either a favorable or unfavorable outcome in this case.

10

Table of Contents

     Celestron and Tasco, in May 2002, transferred certain of their assets in an assignment for the benefit of creditors proceeding to James Feltman, an assignee. Assignee James Feltman subsequently sold the assets on or around June 24, 2002 to a new Celestron entity, Celestron Acquisition LLC. Celestron Acquisition LLC, along with Celestron and Tasco, is a defendant in the above-referenced lawsuits. James Feltman is also a named defendant in the ‘799 lawsuit, but not the ‘942 lawsuit.

     The Company is also involved from time to time in litigation incidental to its business. Management believes that the outcome of such litigation will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

     No matters were submitted to a vote of the Company’s stockholders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.

PART II

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

     The Company’s initial public offering was completed on April 14, 1997 (the “Offering”), and from that date to the present, the Company’s common stock has been listed on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “MEAD”. The high and low sales prices on a per share basis for the Company’s common stock during each quarterly period for the fiscal years ended February 28, 2003 and 2002, respectively, were:

     The reported closing sales price of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq National Market on May 15, 2003 was $2.90. As of May 15, 2002, there were 197 holders of record of the Company’s common stock.

     Other than dividends paid to the Company’s ESOP in August 1996, the Company has not paid any cash dividends on its common stock and does not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends on its common stock in the foreseeable future. Although the Company intends to make future contributions to the ESOP upon Board approval, no cash dividends (other than dividends paid to all holders of common stock) will be paid to the ESOP with respect to future periods.

11

Table of Contents

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

     The following data have been derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements, including the consolidated balance sheets at February 28, 2003 and 2002 and the consolidated statements of operations for the three years ended February 28, 2003 and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     The following discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations is qualified in its entirety by, and should be read in conjunction with, the more detailed information and consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, appearing elsewhere in this Report.

Critical Accounting Policies

     The Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that it believes are reasonable based upon the information available. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The significant accounting policies which management believes are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating the Company’s reported financial results include the following:

12

Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition

     Revenues are generally recorded when title transfers and the risks of ownership are passed to customers. Under certain circumstances, the Company accepts product returns. Material management judgments must be made and used in connection with establishing the sales returns estimates. The Company continuously monitors and tracks returns and records revenues net of provisions for returns. The Company’s estimate of sales returns is based upon several factors including historical experience, current market and economic conditions, customer demand and acceptance of the Company’s products and/or any notification received by the Company of such a return. Historically, sales returns have been within management’s estimates; however, actual returns may differ significantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from management’s estimates depending on actual market conditions at the time of the return.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

     Management analyzes specific customer accounts receivable, customer credit-worthiness, historical bad debt expenses, current economic trends and changes in customer payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. If the financial condition of any of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate to the point of impairing the customer’s ability to make payments on its account, additional allowances would be required. While credit losses have been generally within management’s expectations and the provisions established, significant deterioration in the liquidity or financial position of any of the Company’s major customers or any group of customers could have a material adverse impact on the collectibility of accounts receivable and future operating results.

Inventories

     Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, as determined using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method, or market. Costs include materials, labor and manufacturing overhead. The Company evaluates the carrying value of its inventories taking into account such factors as historical and anticipated future sales compared with quantities on hand and the price the Company expects to obtain for its products in their respective markets. The Company also evaluates the composition of its inventories to identify any slow-moving or obsolete product. These evaluations require material management judgments, including estimates of future sales, continuing market acceptance of the Company’s products, and current market and economic conditions. Inventory reserves are established, based on such judgments, for any inventories that are identified as having a net realizable value less than its cost. Historically, the net realizable value of the Company’s inventories has generally been within management’s estimates. However, if the Company is not able to meet its sales expectations, or if market conditions deteriorate significantly from management’s estimates, reductions in the net realizable value of the Company’s inventories could have a material adverse impact on future operating results.

Results of Operations

     The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain items from the Company’s statements of operations as a percentage of net sales for the periods indicated.

13

Table of Contents

Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002

     Net sales increased from $94.7 million in fiscal 2002 to $110.8 million in fiscal 2003, an increase of 17.0%. Sales of the Company’s binoculars, including the digital camera/binocular, and sales of the Company’s telescope products for the more serious amateur astronomer accounted for increases of approximately $16 million and $9 million, respectively over net sales in the prior year. Also included in net sales for the year ended February 28, 2003 was approximately $10 million from the Simmons subsidiary. Partially offsetting those increases was a decrease in sales of smaller-aperture, less-expensive telescopes.

     Gross profit increased from $24.6 million (26.0% of net sales) in fiscal 2002 to $33.9 million (30.6% of net sales) in fiscal 2003, an increase of 37.7%. The increase in gross profit as a percent of net sales was due to a change in product sales mix and covering fixed costs with higher volume. Sales from the Simmons subsidiary contributed approximately $1.7 million to gross profit. Gross margin on the Simmons sales was below the consolidated Company gross margin for the year due, in part, to sales of close-out inventory on hand at the date of the acquisition.

     Selling expenses increased from $12.9 million (13.7% of net sales) in fiscal 2002 to $14.2 million (12.9% of net sales) in fiscal 2003, an increase of 10.3%. This increase was due, in part, to an increase of approximately $1.8 in advertising and marketing expenses with a significant portion of that increase related to television, radio and print advertising associated with the introduction of the Company’s digital camera/binocular. Selling expenses also include approximately $0.6 million associated with the Simmons subsidiary. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in the Company’s provision for bad debts during the year.

     General and administrative expenses increased from $9.1 million (9.6% of net sales) in fiscal 2002 to $12.6 million (11.4% of net sales) in fiscal 2003, an increase of 38.8%. This increase was due, in part, to an over $2.5 million increase in legal, professional and consulting fees with a significant portion of that increase incurred in connection with the ongoing Tasco and Celestron patent infringement litigation and with the Company’s effort to acquire certain of the assets of Tasco and Celestron. The Company did not consummate such proposed acquisition. Also contributing to the increase over the prior year was approximately $0.5 million in general and administrative expenses from the Simmons subsidiary and an increase of approximately $0.5 million in salaries, wages and bonuses over the prior year.

     ESOP contribution expense decreased from $1.4 million (1.4% of net sales) in fiscal 2002 to $0.9 million (.8% of net sales) in fiscal 2003, a decrease of 33.8%. The decrease in this non-cash charge was due to decreases in the average market price of the Company’s stock and in the number of shares allocated to the Employee Stock Ownership Plan during the year. The non-cash ESOP contribution expense may fluctuate as the number of shares allocated and the market value of the Company’s common stock changes.

     Research and development expenses increased from $2.2 million (2.3% of net sales) in fiscal 2002 to $3.0 million (2.7% of net sales) in fiscal 2003, an increase of 38.8%. In the prior year, approximately $500,000 of research and development expenses incurred were reimbursed by a customer of the Company on a non-contingent basis. A similar expense reimbursement did not occur during the current year, thus accounting for most of the increase year-over-year. The Company does not expect research and development expenses to continue to increase by the dollar amounts or at the rate experienced in the current year. With demand for the Company’s industrial products diminished, research and development costs associated with those product lines will be rationalized.

     Interest expense decreased from $1.3 million for fiscal 2002 (1.4% of net sales) to $1.1 million for fiscal 2003 (1.0% of net sales), a decrease of 15.5%. This decrease was principally due to lower average borrowings and lower cost of funds as compared to the prior year.

Fiscal 2002 Compared to Fiscal 2001

     Net sales decreased from $123.0 million in fiscal 2001 to $94.7 million in fiscal 2002, a decrease of 23.0%. Management believes that the decline in net sales for fiscal 2002 compared to fiscal 2001 was predominantly due to the affects of the global economic recession, management’s planned inventory reduction program and competitive

14

Table of Contents

pricing pressures. For reasons just stated, coupled with product introduction delays, sales of the Company’s advanced astronomical telescopes and related accessories were down nearly $13.0 million compared to the prior year. Entry level telescope sales decreased nearly $19.0 million as compared to the prior year. Partially offsetting these decreases, binocular sales increased by more than $2.0 million over the prior year on the strength of binocular sales in Europe.

     Gross profit decreased from $40.2 million (32.7% of net sales) in fiscal 2001 to $24.6 million (26.0% of net sales) in fiscal 2002, a decrease of 38.8%. Competitive pricing pressures in the U.S. and Europe, and lower sales of advanced telescopes and accessories, both of which typically have higher profit margins than many of the Company’s other product lines, contributed to the lower profit margins.

     Selling expenses decreased from $21.8 million (17.7% of net sales) in fiscal 2001 to $12.9 million (13.7% of net sales) in fiscal 2002, a decrease of 40.7%. This decrease was primarily due to a $7.9 million decrease in advertising and marketing expenses compared to the prior year. The Company reduced national consumer advertising spending and concentrated its efforts on point-of-sale promotions supported by targeted advertising with its major customers. The balance of the reduction from the prior year was concentrated in variable sales costs which were lower in keeping with the lower sales volume during the current year.

     General and administrative expenses increased from $8.4 million (6.9% of net sales) in fiscal 2001 to $9.1 million (9.6% of net sales) in fiscal 2002, an increase of 7.8%. This increase was principally due to increases in consulting and professional fees.

     ESOP contribution expense decreased from $3.0 million (2.4% of net sales) in fiscal 2001 to $1.4 million (1.4% of net sales) in fiscal 2002, a decrease of 54.4%. The decrease in this non-cash charge was due to decreases in the average market price of the Company’s stock allocated to the Employee Stock Ownership Plan during fiscal 2002. The non-cash ESOP contribution expense may fluctuate as the market value of the Company’s common stock changes.

     Research and development expenses increased from $2.1 million (1.7% of net sales) in fiscal 2001 to $2.2 million (2.3% of net sales) in fiscal 2002, an increase of 5.1%. The Company continues to pursue the development of telescope and other consumer related products as well as industrial products in the areas of free space optics and digital imaging. During fiscal 2002, this pursuit led to continued engineering expenditure increases over the prior year due to increased headcount and outside consulting costs. Included as an offset to research and development expenses incurred during fiscal 2002 is a reimbursement of costs of approximately $500,000 received from a customer of the Company on a non-contingent basis.

     Interest expense decreased from $2.0 million for the fiscal year 2001 (1.7% of net sales) to $1.3 million for fiscal 2002 (1.4% of net sales), a decrease of 33.9%. This decrease was principally due to lower average borrowings on the Company’s bank borrowings compared to the prior year.

     The benefit for income taxes decreased to 36.9% of the loss before income taxes for fiscal year 2002 compared to a provision of 55.3% of pre-tax income in the prior year. The decrease in the tax rate was principally due to the impact of non-deductible permanent differences between the Company’s tax books and its financial statements. The ESOP charge was a significant permanent difference in the prior year. Due to lower average stock prices for the Company’s Common Stock, the effect of the ESOP charge on the current year benefit was much less significant.

Seasonality and Quarterly Results of Operations

     The Company has experienced, and expects to continue to experience, substantial fluctuations in its sales, gross margins and profitability from quarter to quarter. Factors that influence these fluctuations include the volume and timing of orders received, changes in the mix of products sold, market acceptance of the Company’s products, competitive pricing pressures, the Company’s ability to meet increasing demand and delivery schedules, the timing and extent of research and development expenses, the timing and extent of product development costs and the timing and extent of advertising expenditures. In addition, a substantial portion of the Company’s net sales and operating income typically occurs in the third quarter of the Company’s fiscal year primarily due to

15

Table of Contents

disproportionately higher customer demand for less-expensive telescopes during the holiday season. The Company continues to experience significant sales to mass merchandisers. Mass merchandisers, along with specialty retailers, purchase a considerable amount of their inventories to satisfy such seasonal customer demand. These purchasing patterns have caused the Company to increase its level of inventory during its second and third quarters in response to such demand or anticipated demand. As a result, the Company’s working capital requirements have correspondingly increased at such times.

     The following tables (in thousands of dollars) present unaudited financial results for each of the eight quarters in the period ended February 28, 2003. The Company believes that all necessary adjustments have been included to present fairly the quarterly information when read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included elsewhere in this Report. The operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results for any subsequent quarter.

     Quarterly results can be affected by a number of factors including the timing of orders, production delays or inefficiencies, and raw materials availability. See “Business — Operations — Materials and Supplies.”

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     The Company funded its operations during the fiscal year with internally generated cash flow, short-term bank borrowings and proceeds from the sale of its common stock. Operating cash flows were generated principally by net income, positive adjustments to net income for depreciation and amortization, decreases in inventories, deferred taxes, prepaid expenses including prepaid income taxes, and increased accrued liabilities. These cash flows were partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable. For the year, cash flows from operations totaled approximately $10.0 million. With a concentrated effort to reduce inventories, the Company improved its inventory turns to just under 2.5 times in fiscal 2003 compared to just under 2.0 times in fiscal 2002 (excluding the effects of the Simmons acquisition). With the reduction in inventories, deferred tax assets related to inventories were also reduced. Cash flows were also generated by a refund of a significant portion of the prior year’s prepaid income taxes. On October 25, 2002 the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common stock of Simmons Outdoor Corp. for $20.8 million cash ($16.0 million was paid at close; the balance was paid in December, 2002). Simmons, a designer and distributor of riflescopes, binoculars and other consumer sports optics offers products under the Simmons, Weaver and Redfield brand names. To fund a portion of the purchase price, the Company sold 3,291,801 shares of its common stock in a private placement for net cash proceeds of $7.3 million. The balance of the purchase price was funded through borrowings on the Company’s bank line of credit. Net working capital totaled approximately $50.1 million at February 28, 2003, up from $41.8 million at February 28, 2002. Working capital requirements fluctuate during the year due to the seasonal nature of the business. These requirements are typically financed through a combination of internally generated cash flow from operating activities and short-term bank borrowings.

     On October 25, 2002, the Company amended its credit agreement with its U.S. bank (the “U.S. credit agreement”). The amendment principally involved increasing the revolving credit facility and incorporating the Simmons acquisition into the credit agreement. The amended agreement provides the Company with a $35.6 million credit facility consisting of a $34.0 million revolving credit line (the “U.S. revolving loan”) and a $1.6 million term loan (the “U.S. term loan”). Amounts outstanding on the U.S. revolving loan and U.S. term loan at February 28, 2003 were approximately $9.1 million and $1.5 million, respectively. Availability under the U.S. revolving loan is subject to a borrowing base with standard advance rates against eligible accounts receivable and inventories. Availability under the U.S. revolving loan at February 28, 2003 was approximately $5.7 million. The U.S. term loan is secured by domestic machinery and equipment. The U.S. term loan is collateralized by domestic machinery and equipment. The amended facility has a three-year term, is collateralized by substantially all of the domestic assets of the Company and its domestic subsidiaries and contains certain financial covenants including but not limited to, Fixed Charge Coverage Ratios. Outstanding amounts under the U.S. revolving loan bear interest at the bank’s base rate or LIBOR rate plus applicable margins. Outstanding amounts on the U.S. revolving loan and U.S. term loan bear interest at the bank’s base rate or LIBOR rate plus applicable margins (4.5% and 7.9%, respectively at February 28, 2003).

16

Table of Contents

     In July 2002, the Company’s German subsidiary renegotiated its agreement with a bank to provide up to approximately $3.8 million in revolving loans (subject to a borrowing base of eligible accounts receivable and inventories) expiring in July 2003. The German subsidiary also has an agreement with the bank that provides a term loan expiring June 2006 collateralized by land and buildings owned by the German subsidiary (collectively, the “European Loans”). Outstanding amounts on the revolving loan and the term loan in Europe at February 28, 2003 were approximately $12,000 and $1.2 million, respectively. The European Loans bear interest at the bank’s base rate plus or minus applicable margins (8.75% and 6.0%, respectively at February 28, 2003).

     The Company continues to depend on operating cash flow and availability under its bank lines of credit to provide short-term liquidity. Availability under its bank lines of credit at February 28, 2003 was approximately $9 million. In the event the Company’s plans require more capital than is presently anticipated, additional sources of liquidity such as debt or equity financings, may be required to meet its capital needs. There can be no assurance that such additional sources of capital will be available on reasonable terms, if at all. However, management believes that operating cash flow and bank borrowing capacity in connection with the Company’s business should provide sufficient liquidity for the Company’s obligations for at least the next twelve months.

     Capital expenditures, including financed purchases of equipment, aggregated $0.7 million, $0.7 million and $2.4 million for the fiscal years ended February 28, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

     Contributions to the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) are accounted for as a contribution expense on the Company’s income statement and are accrued quarterly based upon the expected annual contribution amount. As quarterly contributions are accrued, the corresponding number of shares are added to the Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding and Unearned ESOP Shares on the Company’s Balance Sheet are reduced. The ESOP uses the contributions to repay amounts due on the ESOP Loan. The ESOP contribution expense is a net non-cash charge which is added back to net income to arrive at cash flows provided by operating activities. As the Company makes these non-cash contributions to the ESOP to fund the repayment of the ESOP Loan, the Company will realize cash tax savings equal to the product of the tax basis of the contributions, multiplied by the applicable statutory tax rates in effect at the time.

     Under the terms of its credit agreement, the Company was required to enter into an interest-rate swap to convert the variable interest rate on its U.S. term loan to a fixed interest rate. The resulting cost of funds (7.9% per annum) is currently higher than that which would have been available if the variable rate had been applied during the period. Under the interest-rate swap contract, the Company has agreed with the bank to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between variable-rate and fixed-rate interest amounts, calculated by reference to agreed-upon notional amounts. The change in the fair value of the interest rate swap for the period ended February 28, 2003 was a loss of $23,000 which is included in other comprehensive income for the year ended February 28, 2003.

     The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations as of February 28, 2003, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on its liquidity and cash flows in future periods:

17

Table of Contents

     The preceding table assumes that any operating leases with renewal options that expire during fiscal 2004 or fiscal 2005 will be renewed under the terms of the governing lease agreement.

Inflation

     The Company does not believe that inflation has had a material effect on the results of operations during the past three years. There can be no assurance that the Company’s business will not be affected by inflation in the future.

New Accounting Pronouncements

     In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 143. which establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of an asset retirement obligation and its associated asset retirement cost. It also provides accounting guidance for legal obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets. SFAS No. 143 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 143 for the year ended February 28, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 143 did not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations upon adoption.

     In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144 which establishes a single accounting model for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and new standards for reporting discontinued operations. SFAS No. 144 is effective in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 and, in general, is to be applied prospectively. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 144 for the year ended February 28, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations upon adoption.

     In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 148, which provides alternative transition methods for companies adopting a voluntary change to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation. SFAS 148 also requires enhanced disclosure regarding the method of accounting and the effect of the method used on reported results of operations. SFAS 148 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002 and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002. The Company adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS 148 for the year ended February 28, 2003, and has elected to continue to account for its stock-based compensation under the intrinsic value method.

     In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) 45, which requires disclosures about obligations under certain guarantees issued by the Company, and which requires recognition of a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The liability recognition provisions of FIN 45 are applicable to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002, and the disclosure provisions are effective for interim or annual fiscal periods ending after December 15, 2002. The Company has adopted the provisions of FIN 45 for its year ended February 28, 2003. The adoption of FIN 45 did not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.

     In January 2003, the Company adopted SFAS 146, which addresses accounting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities. In addition, the FASB issued FIN 46, which requires that certain variable interest entities be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity if the equity investors in the entity do not have a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk. FIN 46 is effective immediately for all variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. For all such entities created prior to February 1, 2003, FIN 46 is effective for interim or annual fiscal periods ending after June 15, 2003. The Company does not expect the adoption of these statements to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Forward-Looking Information

     The preceding “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section contains various “forward looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which represent the Company’s reasonable judgment concerning the future and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause the Company’s actual operating results and financial position to differ materially, including the following: the Company’s ability to

18

Table of Contents

expand the markets for telescopes, binoculars, riflescopes, microscope and other optical products; the Company’s ability to continue to develop and bring to market new and innovative products; the Company’s ability to integrate, develop and grow the Simmons business; the Company’s ability to further develop its wholly owned manufacturing facility in Mexico in combination with its existing manufacturing capabilities; the Company expanding its distribution network; the Company’s ability to further develop the business of its European subsidiary; the Company experiencing fluctuations in its sales, gross margins and profitability from quarter to quarter consistent with prior periods; the Company’s expectation that its contingent liabilities will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations; the extent to which the Company will be able to leverage its design and manufacturing expertise in the areas of free-space optics and digital imaging; and the Company’s expectation that it will have sufficient funds to meet any working capital requirements during the foreseeable future with internally generated cash flow and borrowing ability.

     In addition to other information in this report, the Company cautions that certain factors, including, without limitation, the following, should be considered carefully in evaluating the Company and its business and that such factors may cause the Company’s actual operating results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements described above or to otherwise be adversely affected:

     Our business is vulnerable to changing economic conditions, including:

	•		a decline in general economic conditions;
	•		uncertainties affecting consumer spending; and
	•		changes in interest rates causing a reduction of investment income or in the value of market interest rate sensitive instruments.

     Our intellectual property rights are subject to risks, including:

	•		the potential that we may be unable to obtain and maintain patents and copyrights to protect our computerized telescope and other product technology;
	•		competitors’ infringement upon Meade’s existing intellectual property; and
	•		approval of competitors’ patent applications that may restrict our ability to compete effectively.

     Our business is subject to other risks, including:

	•		a general decline in demand for the Company’s products;
	•		an inability to continue to design and manufacture products that will achieve and maintain commercial success;
	•		the potential that we may fail to penetrate the binocular and riflescope markets and achieve meaningful sales;
	•		any significant interruption of our manufacturing abilities in our domestic or Mexican facilities or in any of our suppliers located in the Far East;
	•		greater than anticipated competition;
	•		discovery of facts not presently known to Meade or determinations by judges, juries or other finders of fact which do not accord with Meade’s evaluation of the possible liability or outcome of existing litigation;
	•		any loss of, or the failure to replace, any significant portion of the sales made to any significant customer of the Company; and
	•		increasing ESOP charges in the event the market price of the Company’s stock increases.

19

Table of Contents

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

     The Company is exposed to certain levels of market risks, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as foreign currency exchange and interest rates.

     The Company conducts business in a number of foreign currencies, principally in Europe. These currencies have been relatively stable against the U.S. dollar for the past several years. As a result, foreign currency fluctuations have not had a material impact historically on Meade’s revenues or results of operations. There can be no assurance that European or other currencies will remain stable relative to the U.S. dollar or that future fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results, revenues and financial condition.

     The Company has adopted a hedging program to manage its foreign currency exchange rate and interest rate risks. Upon continuing evaluation and when deemed appropriate by management, the Company may enter into hedging instruments to manage its foreign currency exchange and interest rate risks.

     Under the terms of its credit agreement, the Company was required to enter into an interest-rate swap to convert the variable interest rate on its U.S. Term Loan to a fixed interest rate. The resulting cost of funds (7.9% per annum) is currently higher than that which would have been available if the variable rate had been applied during the period. Under the interest-rate swap contract, the Company has agreed with the bank to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between variable-rate and fixed-rate interest amounts, calculated by reference to agreed-upon notional amounts. The change in the fair value of the interest rate swap for the period ended February 28, 2003 was a loss of $23,000 which is included in other comprehensive income for the year ended February 28, 2003.

     The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and long-term obligations. The Company’s exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to short-term investments and short-term obligations. As a result, the Company does not expect fluctuations in interest rates to have a material impact on the fair value of these instruments.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

     Information with respect to this item is set forth in Item 16.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants On Accounting and Financial Disclosure

     None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

     Information with respect to this item is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Commission within 120 days after the close of the Company’s fiscal year. Information regarding executive officers of the Company is set forth under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant” in Item 1 hereof.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

     Information with respect to this item is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Commission within 120 days after the close of the Company’s fiscal year.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

     Information with respect to this item is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Commission within 120 days after the close of the Company’s fiscal year.

20

Table of Contents

Equity Compensation Plan Information

     The following table provides information as of February 28, 2003 with respect to shares of Meade common stock that may be issued under the Stock Incentive Plan.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

     Information with respect to this item is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Commission within 120 days after the close of the Company’s fiscal year.

Item 14. Controls and Procedures

     A.     Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

     The Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-14 (c), promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) are sufficiently effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files under the Exchange Act is gathered, analyzed and disclosed with adequate timeliness, accuracy and completeness, based on an evaluation of such controls and procedures conducted within 90 days prior to the date hereof.

     B.     Changes in internal controls.

     There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation referred to above.

21

Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports On Form 8-K

(a)

The following documents are filed as part of this report:

(b)

Reports on Form 8-K:

None

22

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Meade Instruments Corp.

     In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) on page 22, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Meade Instruments Corp. and its subsidiaries at February 28, 2003 and 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 28, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under 15(a)(2) on page 22, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

     A discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” on March 1, 2002 and as a result changed its method of accounting for goodwill.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Orange County, California
April 22, 2003

F-1

Table of Contents

MEADE INSTRUMENTS CORP.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

ASSETS

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-2

Table of Contents

MEADE INSTRUMENTS CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-3

Table of Contents

MEADE INSTRUMENTS CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY