SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
||
þ
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (No Fee Required) |
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2002 | ||
OR | ||
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (No Fee Required) |
Commission File No. 1-9396
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC.
Delaware | 86-0498599 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
17911 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 300 Irvine, California 92614 |
(949) 622-4333 | |
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) |
(Registrants telephone number, including area code) |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Name of each exchange | ||
Title of each class | on which registered | |
Common Stock, $.0001 par value
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K, or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
As of March 18, 2003, 95,921,397 shares of Common Stock ($.0001 par value) were outstanding.
The aggregate market value of the shares of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2002 was $2,886,812,378.
The information in Part III hereof is incorporated herein by reference to the registrants Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, to be filed within 120 days after the close of the fiscal year that is the subject of this Report.
The index to exhibits is contained in Part IV herein on Page 78.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORM 10-K
Page | ||||||
Number | ||||||
PART I | ||||||
Item 1.
|
Business
|
1 | ||||
Item 2.
|
Properties
|
16 | ||||
Item 3.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
17 | ||||
Item 4.
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders
|
17 | ||||
PART II | ||||||
Item 5.
|
Market for Registrants Common Equity and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
18 | ||||
Item 6.
|
Selected Financial Data
|
19 | ||||
Item 7.
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
21 | ||||
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about
Market Risk
|
31 | ||||
Item 8.
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
33 | ||||
Item 9.
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure
|
77 | ||||
PART III | ||||||
Item 10.
|
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
|
77 | ||||
Item 11.
|
Executive Compensation
|
77 | ||||
Item 12.
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
|
77 | ||||
Item 13.
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
|
77 | ||||
Item 14.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
77 | ||||
PART IV | ||||||
Item 15.
|
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and
Reports on Form 8-K
|
78 |
i
PART I
Item 1. Business
We are the largest title insurance and diversified real estate related services company in the United States. Our title insurance underwriters Fidelity National Title, Chicago Title, Ticor Title, Security Union Title and Alamo Title together issued approximately 29% of all title insurance policies issued nationally during 2001. We provide title insurance in 49 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and in Canada and Mexico. Since acquiring Chicago Title Corporation in March 2000, we have leveraged our national network of 1,100 direct offices and 8,800 agents to secure the leading market share (based on net premiums written) in three out of the four states that account for approximately 50% of the real estate activity in the country.
In addition, we provide a broad array of escrow and other title related services, as well as real estate related products and services, including:
| collection and trust activities | |
| trustees sales guarantees | |
| recordings | |
| reconveyances | |
| property appraisal services | |
| credit reporting | |
| exchange intermediary services in connection with real estate transactions | |
| real estate tax services | |
| home warranty insurance | |
| foreclosure posting and publishing services | |
| loan portfolio services | |
| flood certification | |
| field services | |
| property data and disclosure services | |
| multiple listing services | |
| mortgage loan fulfillment services | |
| flood insurance | |
| homeowners insurance |
All dollars presented in this document are in thousands, except per share amounts and unless indicated otherwise.
Market for Title Insurance
The title insurance market in the United States is large and growing. According to Corporate Development Services, Inc., total revenues for the entire U.S. title insurance industry grew from $4.8 billion in 1995 to $9.7 billion in 2001. Growth in the industry is closely tied to various macroeconomic factors, including, but not limited to, growth in the gross national product, inflation, interest rates and sales of new and existing homes as well as the refinancing of previously issued mortgages.
1
Virtually every real estate transaction consummated in the U.S. requires the use of title insurance by a lending institution before a transaction can be finalized. Generally, revenues from title insurance policies are directly correlated with the value of the property underlying the title policy, and appreciation in the overall value of the real estate market drives growth in total industry revenues. Industry revenues are also driven by swings in interest rates, which affect demand for new mortgage loans and refinancing transactions.
The U.S. title insurance industry is concentrated among a handful of industry participants. According to Corporate Development Services, the top five title insurance companies accounted for 88% of net premiums collected in 2001. Over 40 independent title insurance companies accounted for the remaining 12% of net premiums collected in 2001. Over the last few years, the title insurance industry has been consolidating, beginning with the merger of Lawyers Title Insurance and Commonwealth Land Title Insurance in 1998 to create LandAmerica Financial Group, Inc., followed by our acquisition of Chicago Title in March 2000. Consolidation has created opportunities for increased financial and operating efficiencies for the industrys largest participants and should continue to drive profitability and market share in the industry.
Strategy
Our strategy is to maximize operating profits by increasing our market share in the title insurance business and by aggressively and effectively managing operating expenses throughout the real estate business cycle. In addition, we plan to broaden our market penetration by focusing on our real estate related products and services. To accomplish our goals, we intend to:
| Continue to operate each of our five title brands independently. We believe that in order to maintain and strengthen our title insurance revenue base, we must leave the Fidelity Title, Chicago Title, Ticor Title, Security Union Title and Alamo Title brands intact and operate them independently. Entrepreneurship and close customer relationships are an integral part of the culture at each of our title brands. We believe this culture of independence aids in employee retention, which is critical to the operating success of each brand. | |
| Consistently deliver high quality products with superior customer service. We believe customer service and consistent product delivery are the most important factors in attracting and retaining customers. We continue to focus our marketing efforts and distribution network to serve our customers in the residential, institutional and commercial market sectors. | |
| Continue to expand the scope and breadth of the real estate related products and services we offer. We plan to maximize the value of the Fidelity brand through the penetration of our real estate related products and services into our large, diverse customer base. These products and services that Fidelity offers include: exchange intermediary services, home warranty insurance, foreclosure posting and publishing, loan portfolio services, field services, flood insurance, mortgage loan fulfillment services and homeowners insurance. In addition, we own approximately 66.1% of the outstanding common stock of Fidelity National Information Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ: FNIS) (FNIS), a publicly traded real estate services company. FNIS provides: (i) data and valuations services, including flood certification, credit reporting, real estate tax services, property data and disclosure services, and automated valuation and appraisal services; (ii) technology solutions, including multiple listing services; and (iii) services, including litigation support and risk management. Together with FNIS, we will strive to provide a comprehensive, integrated suite of products and services that enable real estate transaction participants to streamline their production processes, operate more profitable businesses and enhance their customers experiences. |
Recent Developments
$250.0 million, 5.25% Notes |
On March 11, 2003, we issued $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.25% notes. We received proceeds of approximately $246.1 million, after expenses, which will be used to pay a portion of the $1,050.0 million purchase price of ALLTEL Information Services, Inc. (see below). Interest is payable semiannually and the notes are due in March 2013.
2
ALLTEL Information Services, Inc. |
On January 28, 2003, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with ALLTEL Corporation, Inc., a Delaware corporation (ALLTEL), pursuant to which we will acquire from ALLTEL its financial services division, ALLTEL Information Services, Inc. (AIS), an Arkansas corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of ALLTEL. As a result of the acquisition, AIS will become our wholly-owned subsidiary. AIS is one of the worlds largest providers of information-based technology solutions and processing services to the mortgage and financial services industries. The transaction is expected to close by the end of the first quarter of 2003. Under the terms of the stock purchase agreement, all of the issued and outstanding shares of AIS common stock will be purchased by us for consideration consisting of $775.0 million in cash and $275.0 million in our common stock. Consummation of the acquisition is subject to customary closing conditions. In connection with the stock purchase agreement, prior to closing we will enter into a stockholders agreement, a non-competition agreement and certain transition agreements with ALLTEL. The stockholders agreement will: (1) restrict the sale by ALLTEL of our common stock received in the transaction for up to one year, (2) grant ALLTEL the right to designate one nominee to our Board of Directors, so long as it continues to hold at least 50% of the shares of our common stock received in the transaction, and (3) grant ALLTEL certain registration rights with respect to our common stock it receives in the transaction. The non-competition agreement will prohibit, with certain exceptions, ALLTEL and its affiliates from engaging in the business relating to the assets acquired by us for a period of two years after the transaction. In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142), any goodwill recorded as a result of the acquisition of AIS will not be amortized. See Note A of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Lenders Service, Inc. |
On February 10, 2003 we acquired Lenders Service, Inc., a Delaware corporation (LSI), for approximately $75.0 million in cash. LSI is a leading provider of appraisal, title and closing services to residential mortgage originators. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, goodwill recorded in the LSI transaction will not be amortized. See Note A of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Bankers Insurance Group |
On January 9, 2003 we acquired certain assets of Bankers Insurance Group (Bankers) for approximately $41.6 million in cash. The assets include the right to issue new and renewal flood insurance policies underwritten by Bankers and its subsidiaries, Bankers Insurance Company, Bankers Security Insurance Company and First Community Insurance Company (FCIC). As part of the transaction, we also acquired FCIC, a fifty-state licensed insurance carrier, to act as the underwriter for the policies. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, goodwill recorded in the Bankers transaction will not be amortized. See Note A of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Fidelity National Information Solutions, Inc. |
On January 3, 2001, we acquired International Data Management Corporation (IDM), a leading provider of real estate information services, for $20.8 million in cash. IDMs real estate information databases contain over 100 million real property ownership and sales records from the continental United States. The databases are updated daily to reflect new sales, mortgage information and other changes in real property ownership.
On June 19, 2001 we acquired Risco, Inc. (Risco), the third largest multiple listing service vendor in the United States, for approximately $12.0 million in cash.
On August 1, 2001, we acquired approximately 80% of the outstanding common stock of Fidelity National Information Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ: FNIS FNIS), formerly VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. (Vista), a provider of real estate information products and services, including multiple listing services and environmental data and disclosure information businesses. In consideration for this acquisition, we contributed our wholly-owned tax, credit, flood, appraisal, property records (IDM) and multiple listing
3
Acquisition of Micro General Corporation by FNIS |
On April 30, 2002, FNIS announced a tender offer for all of the outstanding shares of Micro General Corporation (Micro General), our majority-owned public subsidiary, whereby each share of Micro General common stock would be exchanged for shares of FNIS common stock. On July 9, 2002, the tender offer and subsequent short form merger was completed and Micro General became a wholly-owned subsidiary of FNIS. Under the terms of the tender offer and merger, each share of Micro General common stock was exchanged for .696 shares of FNIS common stock. FNIS issued approximately 12.9 million shares of common stock to Micro General stockholders, resulting in approximately 38.3 million outstanding shares of FNIS common stock. As of December 31, 2002, we own approximately 66.1% of the outstanding common stock of FNIS. In our Consolidated Financial Statements, this transaction is accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141) and FASB Technical Bulletin 85-5. Accordingly, FNISs acquisition of the minority stockholders interest in Micro General (the noncontrolled equity interest) was recognized by us as the acquisition of shares from a minority interest, which is accounted for by the purchase method under SFAS No. 141. FNISs acquisition of our interest in Micro General (the controlled equity interest) is not considered a business combination and, therefore, we recognized the related assets and liabilities transferred from the controlled equity interest in Micro General to FNIS at their historical carrying values. The market price per share of FNIS common stock that was issued to Micro General minority stockholders in this transaction exceeded our carrying amount per share of FNIS common stock, resulting in an increase of $98.7 million to our consolidated equity and an increase in net assets, the majority of which was goodwill. We have recorded certain preliminary purchase accounting adjustments, which are based on estimates utilizing available information. Such purchase accounting adjustments may be refined as additional information becomes available.
Acquisition of ANFI, Inc. |
In July 2002, we purchased 883,178 shares of the common stock of ANFI, Inc. (ANFI), a publicly traded California corporation, formerly known as American National Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: ANFI), of which 98,200 shares were purchased in the open market at an average price of $11.51, and the remaining shares were purchased from certain executive officers of ANFI for a negotiated price of $12.00 per share. As a result of these purchases, we increased our ownership percentage of ANFI to approximately 28.0%. As of December 31, 2002 we account for our investment in ANFI under the equity method of accounting.
On January 9, 2003, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with ANFI. The merger agreement was subsequently amended on February 21, 2003. Pursuant to the merger agreement, ANFI will merge with and into our wholly-owned merger subsidiary. In the merger, each share of ANFI common stock (other than ANFI common stock we already own) will be exchanged for 0.454 of a share of our common stock. The consummation of the transaction is subject to the approval of ANFI stockholders. The ANFI stockholder meeting is currently scheduled to be held on March 26, 2003 and we currently anticipate closing the merger on March 27, 2003. We anticipate that we will issue approximately 3.2 million shares of our common stock to the ANFI stockholders in the merger.
Homebuilders Financial Network, Inc. |
On May 23, 2002, we acquired a 75% interest in Homebuilders Financial Network, Inc. (HFN), a provider of outsource mortgage loan fulfillment services to homebuilders, for approximately $21.0 million in cash. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, goodwill recorded in the HFN transaction will not be amortized. See Note A of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Industry Overview
Title Insurance Policies. Generally, real estate buyers and mortgage lenders purchase title insurance to insure good and marketable title to real estate. Today, virtually all real property mortgage lenders require their borrowers to obtain a title insurance policy at the time a mortgage loan is made. Title insurance premiums are based upon either the purchase price of the property insured or the amount of the mortgage loan. Title insurance premiums are due in full at the closing of the real estate transaction, and the policy generally terminates upon the resale or refinancing of the property.
Prior to issuing policies, underwriters can reduce or eliminate future claim losses by accurately performing searches and examinations. A title companys predominant expense relates to such searches and examinations, the preparation of preliminary title reports, policies or commitments and the maintenance of title plants, which are indexed compilations of public records, maps and other relevant historical documents. Claim losses generally result from errors or mistakes made in the title search and examination process and from hidden defects such as fraud, forgery, incapacity, missing heirs or refinancing of the property.
Commercial real estate title insurance policies insure title to commercial real property, and generally involve higher coverage amounts and yield higher premiums, thereby generating greater profit margins than title policies for residential real estate transactions. Prior to the Chicago Title merger, we issued primarily residential real property title insurance policies. In the Chicago Title merger, we acquired Chicago Titles National Commercial & Industrial business group, which specializes in meeting the needs of clients involved in large commercial transactions. As discussed later under the heading Economic Factors Affecting Industry, the volume of commercial real estate transactions is affected primarily by fluctuations in local supply and demand conditions for office space, while residential real estate transaction volume is primarily affected by macroeconomic and seasonal factors. Thus, we believe the addition of Chicago Titles commercial real estate title insurance base will help in maintaining uniform revenue levels throughout the seasons.
Losses and Reserves. While most other forms of insurance provide for the assumption of risk of loss arising out of unforeseen events, title insurance serves to protect the policyholder from risk of loss from events that predate the issuance of the policy. As a result, claim losses associated with issuing title policies are less expensive when compared to other insurance underwriters. The maximum amount of liability under a title insurance policy is usually the face amount of the policy plus the cost of defending the insureds title against an adverse claim.
Reserves for claim losses are established based upon known claims, as well as losses we expect to incur based upon historical experience and other factors, including industry averages, claim loss history, legal environment, geographic considerations, expected recoupments and the types of policies written. We also reserve for losses arising from escrow, closing and disbursement functions due to fraud or operational error.
A title insurance company can minimize its losses by having strict quality control systems and underwriting standards in place. These controls increase the likelihood that the appropriate level of diligence is conducted in completing a title search so that the possibility of potential claims is significantly mitigated. In the case of independent agents, who conduct their own title searches, the agency agreement between the agent and the title insurance underwriter gives the underwriter the ability to proceed against the agent when a loss arises from a flawed title search.
Courts and juries sometimes award damages against insurance companies, including title insurance companies, in excess of policy limits. Such awards are typically based on allegations of fraud, misrepresentation, deceptive trade practices or other wrongful acts commonly referred to as bad faith. Although we have not experienced damage awards materially in excess of policy limits, the possibility of such bad faith damage awards may cause us to experience increased costs and difficulty in settling title claims.
The maximum insurable amount under any single title insurance policy is determined by statutorily calculated net worth. The highest self-imposed single policy maximum insurable amounts for any of our title insurance subsidiaries is $250.0 million.
5
Direct and Agency Operations. We provide title insurance services through our direct operations and wholly-owned underwritten title companies, and additionally through independent title insurance agents who issue title policies on behalf of title underwriters. Title underwriters determine the terms and conditions upon which they will insure title to the real property according to their underwriting standards, policies and procedures. In our direct operations, the title underwriter issues the title insurance policy and retains the entire premium paid in connection with the transaction. In our agency operations, the search and examination function is performed by an independent agent. The agent thus retains the majority of the title premium collected, with the balance remitted to the title underwriter for bearing the risk of loss in the event that a claim is made under the title insurance policy. Independent agents may select among several title underwriters based upon the amount of the premium split offered by the underwriter, the overall terms and conditions of the agency agreement and the scope of services offered to the agent. Premium splits vary by geographic region.
Our direct operations provide the following benefits:
| higher margins because we retain the entire premium from each transaction instead of paying a commission to an agent; | |
| continuity of service levels to a broad range of customers; and | |
| additional sources of income through escrow and other real estate related services, such as property appraisal services, collection and trust activities, real estate information and technology services, trustees sales guarantees, credit reporting, flood certification, real estate tax services, reconveyances, recordings, foreclosure publishing and posting services and exchange intermediary services in connection with real estate transactions. |
Economic Factors Affecting Industry. Title insurance revenue is closely related to the level of real estate activity and the average price of real estate sales. Real estate sales are directly affected by the availability of funds to finance purchases i.e., mortgage interest rates. Other factors affecting real estate activity include, but are not limited to, demand for housing, employment levels, family income levels and general economic conditions. We have found that residential real estate activity generally decreases in the following situations:
| when mortgage interest rates are high; | |
| when the mortgage funding supply is limited; and | |
| when the United States economy is weak. |
Because commercial real estate transactions tend to be driven more by supply and demand for commercial space and occupancy rates in a particular area rather than by macroeconomic events, our commercial real estate title insurance business can generate revenues which offset the industry cycles discussed above.
Historically, real estate transactions have produced seasonal revenue levels for title insurers. The first calendar quarter is typically the weakest quarter in terms of revenue due to the generally low volume of home sales during January and February. The fourth calendar quarter is typically the strongest in terms of revenue due to commercial entities desiring to complete transactions by year-end. Significant changes in interest rates may alter these traditional seasonal patterns due to the effect the cost of financing has on the volume of real estate transactions.
Title Insurance Operations
Our direct operations are divided into approximately 200 profit centers consisting of more than 1,100 direct offices. Each profit center processes title insurance transactions within its geographical area, which is usually identified by a county, a group of counties forming a region, or a state, depending on the management structure in that part of the country. We also transact title insurance business through a network of approximately 8,800 agents, primarily in those areas in which agents are the more accepted title insurance provider.
6
The following table sets forth the approximate dollars and percentages of title insurance premium revenue by state. The year ended December 31, 2000, includes title insurance premium revenue by state, both in dollars and as a percentage of the total, on a pro forma basis, assuming the Chicago Title merger had been consummated on January 1, 2000.
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
California
|
$ | 895,698 | 25.2 | % | $ | 667,088 | 24.8 | % | $ | 449,536 | 20.6 | % | |||||||||||||
Texas
|
429,740 | 12.1 | 360,672 | 13.4 | 318,970 | 14.6 | |||||||||||||||||||
New York
|
295,636 | 8.3 | 212,175 | 7.9 | 184,285 | 8.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
Florida
|
215,367 | 6.1 | 159,135 | 5.9 | 139,906 | 6.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
Illinois
|
173,671 | 4.9 | 132,465 | 4.9 | 106,381 | 4.9 | |||||||||||||||||||
Arizona
|
127,781 | 3.6 | 108,415 | 4.0 | 76,895 | 3.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
All others
|
1,409,836 | 39.8 | 1,054,529 | 39.1 | 907,096 | 41.6 | |||||||||||||||||||
Totals
|
$ | 3,547,729 | 100.0 | % | $ | 2,694,479 | 100.0 | % | $ | 2,183,069 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||
For the entire title insurance industry, 13 states accounted for approximately 75.0% of title premiums written in the United States in 2001. California represented the single largest state with 20.7%.
We also analyze our business by examining the level of premiums generated by direct and agency operations. The following table presents the percentages of title insurance premiums generated by direct and agency operations:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts | % | Amounts | % | Amounts | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct
|
$ | 1,610,792 | 45.4 | % | $ | 1,291,276 | 47.9 | % | $ | 811,621 | 41.7 | % | |||||||||||||
Agency
|
1,936,937 | 54.6 | 1,403,203 | 52.1 | 1,134,538 | 58.3 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total title insurance premiums
|
$ | 3,547,729 | 100.0 | % | $ | 2,694,479 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,946,159 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Our relationship with each agent is governed by an agency agreement defining how the agent issues a title insurance policy on our behalf. The agency agreement also prescribes how the agent may be liable to us for policy losses attributable to the agents errors. The agency agreement is usually terminable without cause upon 30 days notice or immediately for cause. In determining whether to engage or retain an independent agent, we consider the agents experience, financial condition, and loss history. For each agent with whom we enter into an agency agreement, we maintain financial and loss experience records. We also conduct periodic audits of our agents.
Escrow and Other Title Related Fees. In addition to fees for underwriting title insurance policies, we derive a significant amount of our revenues from escrow and other title related fees. A title insurance company in a real estate transaction generally acts as an intermediary completing all the necessary documentation and services required for closing the real estate transaction.
In a typical residential transaction, a title insurance order is received from a realtor, lawyer, developer or mortgage lender. When a title order is received by the title insurance company or agent, the title search begins and the title order is considered open. Once documentation has been prepared and signed, mortgage lender payoff demands are in hand and documents have been ordered and the transaction has been recorded, the title order is considered closed. A lawyer, an escrow company or a title insurance company or agent performs the closing function, most commonly referred to as an escrow in the western United States. The entity providing the closing function (the closer) holds the sellers deed of trust and the buyers mortgage until all issues relating to the transaction have been settled. After these issues have been cleared, the closer delivers the transaction documents, records the appropriate title documents in the county recorders office and arranges the
7
The combination of title insurance premiums and these escrow and other title related services allows us to generate a significant source of revenue.
Reinsurance. In the ordinary course of business, we limit our maximum loss exposure by reinsuring certain risks with other title insurers. We also earn additional income by assuming reinsurance for certain risks of other title insurers. In addition, we cede a portion of certain policy and other liabilities under agent fidelity, excess of loss and case-by-case reinsurance agreements. Reinsurance agreements provide generally that the reinsurer is liable for loss and loss adjustment expense payments exceeding the amount retained by the ceding company. However, the ceding company remains primarily liable in the event the reinsurer does not meet its contractual obligations.
Real Estate Related Services
We, including our majority-owned subsidiaries, also provide many specialized products and services required to execute and close real estate transactions that are not offered by our title insurance subsidiaries. Our real estate related services allow us to diversify from our core title business and yield higher profit margins. These services include the following:
| Property appraisal services. We offer property appraisal services through a network of state-licensed contract appraisers. We also provide detailed real estate property evaluation services to lending institutions utilizing artificial intelligence software, detailed real estate statistical analysis and physical property inspections. | |
| Credit reporting. We provide credit information reports to mortgage lenders nationwide, as well as a variety of related products to meet the ever-changing needs of the mortgage industry. | |
| Flood certification. Federal legislation passed in 1994 requires most mortgage lenders to obtain a propertys flood zone status at the time a loan is originated. We provide these required flood zone determination reports to mortgage lenders nationwide. | |
| Real estate tax services. We advise lending and mortgage related institutions throughout the United States of the status of property tax payments that are due on properties securing their loans over the entire life of the loan. We protect lenders against losses from failing to monitor delinquent taxes. | |
| Home warranty insurance. We issue one-year, renewable insurance policies that protect homeowners against defects in household systems and appliances. | |
| Foreclosure posting and publishing. We offer posting and publication of foreclosure and auction notices to the real estate foreclosure industry. | |
| Exchange intermediary services. We provide customers with qualified exchanges under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, which allows customers to defer the payment of capital gain taxes on the sale of their investment property. | |
| Loan portfolio services. We provide a comprehensive line of document preparation and recording services on a national basis, including computerized tracking services, mortgage assignment and release preparation, due diligence and research services, and verifying chain of title. | |
| Field services. We provide property inspection, preservation and maintenance services to mortgage lenders nationwide. | |
| Property data and disclosure services. We provide records data for over 1,250 counties encompassing over 100 million property ownership, mortgage and sales records, representing 80% of the total property owners in the United States. |
8
| Multiple listing services. We provide multiple listing service organizations with systems integration solutions, which combine computer hardware, internally developed and licensed software, telecommunications, security, customer support and maintenance to provide immediate and reliable access to and updating of the property listings database that represents the shelf stock of the real estate profession. | |
| Mortgage loan fulfillment services. We partner with large and middle-market homebuilders across the country to establish and manage captive mortgage finance businesses that originate, underwrite, process and place first mortgages on newly constructed homes. | |
| Flood insurance. We issue new and renewal flood insurance policies in conjunction with the National Flood Insurance Program. | |
| Homeowners insurance. We offer and underwrite homeowners insurance in various states. |
Other Income
Other income represents externally generated revenue by Micro General, which was merged with FNIS on July 9, 2002 (See Recent Developments) and FNF Capital, our wholly-owned equipment-leasing subsidiary.
Marketing
We market and distribute our products and services to customers in the residential, institutional lender, and commercial market sectors of the real estate industry through customer solicitation by sales personnel. We actively encourage our sales personnel to develop new business relationships with persons in the real estate community, such as real estate sales agents and brokers, financial institutions, independent escrow companies and title agents, real estate developers, mortgage brokers and attorneys. While the focus of the smaller, local client remains important, large customers, such as national residential mortgage lenders, real estate investment trusts and developers have become an increasingly important part of our business. The buying criteria of locally based clients differ from those of large, geographically diverse customers in that the former tend to emphasize personal relationships and ease of transaction execution, while the latter generally places more emphasis on consistent product delivery across diverse geographical regions and ability of service providers to meet their information systems requirements for electronic product delivery. We believe customer service and consistent product delivery are the most important factors in attracting and retaining customers, and we measure customer service in terms of quality, consistency and timeliness in the delivery of services.
Competition
The title insurance industry is highly competitive. According to Corporate Development Services, the top five title insurance companies accounted for 88% of net premiums collected in 2001. Over 40 independent title insurance companies accounted for the remaining 12% of the market. The number and size of competing companies varies in the different geographic areas in which we conduct our business. In our principal markets, competitors include other major title underwriters such as First American Corporation, LandAmerica Financial Group, Inc., Old Republic International Corporation and Stewart Information Services Corporation, as well as numerous smaller title insurance companies and independent agency operations at the regional and local level. These smaller companies may expand into other markets in which we compete. Also, the removal of regulatory barriers might result in new competitors entering the title insurance business, and those new competitors may include diversified financial services companies that have greater financial resources than we do and possess other competitive advantages. Competition among the major title insurance companies, expansion by smaller regional companies and any new entrants with alternative products could affect our business operations and financial condition.
Competition in the title insurance industry is based primarily on expertise, service and price. In addition, the financial strength of the insurer has become an increasingly important factor in decisions relating to the purchase of title insurance, particularly in multi-state transactions and in situations involving real estate related investment vehicles such as real estate investment trusts and real estate mortgage investment conduits.
9
Our real estate related service subsidiaries face significant competition from other similar service providers. In addition, these customers may choose to produce these services internally rather than purchase them from outside vendors.
Regulation
Title insurance companies, including underwriters, underwritten title companies and independent agents, are subject to extensive regulation under applicable state laws. Each insurance underwriter is usually subject to a holding company act in its state of domicile, which regulates, among other matters, the ability to pay dividends and investment policies. The laws of most states in which we transact business establish supervisory agencies with broad administrative powers relating to issuing and revoking licenses to transact business, regulating trade practices, licensing agents, approving policy forms, accounting practices, financial practices, establishing reserve and capital and surplus as regards policyholders (capital and surplus) requirements, defining suitable investments for reserves and capital and surplus and approving rate schedules. Effective January 2001, our insurance subsidiaries were required to prepare their statutory financial statements in accordance with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners Statements of Statutory Accounting Principles (Codification), subject to the adoption by their respective domiciliary states. The adoption of Codification did not have a material effect on the statutory capital and surplus of our insurance subsidiaries.
Pursuant to statutory accounting requirements of the various states in which our title insurance subsidiaries are licensed, those subsidiaries must defer a portion of premiums earned as an unearned premium reserve for the protection of policyholders and must maintain qualified assets in an amount equal to the statutory requirements. The level of unearned premium reserve required to be maintained at any time is determined by statutory formula based upon either the age, number of policies, and dollar amount of policy liabilities underwritten, or the age and dollar amount of statutory premiums written. As of December 31, 2002, the combined statutory unearned premium reserve required and reported for our title insurance subsidiaries was $861.4 million.
The insurance commissioners of their respective states of domicile regulate our title insurance subsidiaries. Regulatory examinations usually occur at three-year intervals, and certain of these examinations are currently ongoing.
Our title insurance subsidiaries are subject to regulations that restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other distributions of cash or property to their immediate parent company without prior approval from the Department of Insurance of their respective states of domicile. During 2003, our title insurance subsidiaries can pay dividends or make other distributions to us of $114.9 million.
The combined statutory capital and surplus of our title insurance subsidiaries was $614.8 million, $514.7 million and $461.4 million as of December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The combined statutory earnings of our title insurance subsidiaries were $162.6 million, $162.5 million and $87.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
As a condition to continued authority to underwrite policies in the states in which our title insurance subsidiaries conduct their business, they are required to pay certain fees and file information regarding their officers, directors and financial condition. In addition, our escrow and trust business is subject to regulation by various state banking authorities.
Pursuant to statutory requirements of the various states in which our title insurance subsidiaries are domiciled, they must maintain certain levels of minimum capital and surplus. Each of our title underwriters has complied with the minimum statutory requirements as of December 31, 2002.
Our underwritten title companies are also subject to certain regulation by insurance regulatory or banking authorities, primarily relating to minimum net worth. Minimum net worth of $7.5 million, $2.5 million and $3.0 million is required for Fidelity National Title Company, Fidelity National Title Company of California and Chicago Title Company, respectively. All of our companies are in compliance with their respective minimum net worth requirements at December 31, 2002.
10
Ratings
Our title insurance subsidiaries are regularly assigned ratings by independent agencies designed to indicate their financial condition and/or claims paying ability. The ratings agencies determine ratings by quantitatively and qualitatively analyzing financial data and other information. Our subsidiaries include Fidelity National Title, Chicago Title, Ticor Title, Security Union Title and Alamo Title. Ratings of our principal title insurance subsidiaries, individually and collectively, are listed below:
Standard and Poors (Financial Strength
Rating)
|
||||
FNF Family
|
A | |||
Moodys (Financial Strength
Rating)
|
||||
FNF Family
|
A2 | |||
A.M. Best Co. (Financial Strength
Rating)
|
||||
FNF Family
|
A | |||
Fitch (Claims Paying Ability Rating)
|
||||
FNF Family
|
A | |||
Demotech, Inc. (Financial Stability
Rating)
|
||||
Fidelity Title
|
A | | ||
Fidelity Title New York
|
A | |||
Chicago Title
|
A | | ||
Ticor Title
|
A | | ||
Security Union Title
|
A | | ||
Alamo Title
|
A | |
Investment Policies and Investment Portfolio
Our investment policy is designed to maintain a high quality portfolio, maximize income, minimize interest rate risk and match the duration of our portfolio to our liabilities. We also make investments in certain equity securities in order to take advantage of perceived value and for strategic purposes. Various states regulate what types of assets qualify for purposes of capital and surplus and unearned premium reserves. Our subsidiaries investments are restricted by the state insurance regulations of their domiciliary states and are limited primarily to cash and cash equivalents, federal and municipal governmental securities, mortgage loans, certain investment grade debt securities, equity securities and real estate.
As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, the carrying amount, which approximates the fair value, of total investments was $2,565.6 million and $1,823.5 million, respectively.
We purchase investment grade fixed maturity securities, selected non-investment grade fixed maturity securities and equity securities. The securities in our portfolio are subject to economic conditions and normal market risks and uncertainties.
11
The following table presents certain information regarding the investment ratings of our fixed maturity portfolio at December 31, 2002 and 2001.
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | % of | Fair | % of | Amortized | % of | Fair | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rating(1) | Cost | Total | Value | Total | Cost | Total | Value | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AAA
|
$ | 999,476 | 66.1 | % | $ | 1,032,682 | 66.0 | % | $ | 665,655 | 55.9 | % | $ | 679,478 | 55.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
AA
|
276,479 | 18.3 | 289,132 | 18.5 | 294,975 | 24.7 | 301,087 | 24.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
A
|
123,364 | 8.2 | 128,865 | 8.2 | 110,500 | 9.3 | 114,150 | 9.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
BBB
|
36,445 | 2.4 | 35,698 | 2.3 | 71,258 | 6.0 | 72,991 | 6.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
76,193 | 5.0 | 77,806 | 5.0 | 48,891 | 4.1 | 48,534 | 4.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 1,511,957 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,564,183 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,191,279 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,216,240 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
(1) | Ratings as assigned by Standard & Poors Ratings Group and Moodys Investors Service. |
Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Fixed maturity securities with an amortized cost of $65.8 million and a fair value of $68.4 million were callable at December 31, 2002.
The following table presents certain information regarding our fixed maturity securities at December 31, 2002:
December 31, 2002 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortized | % of | Fair | % of | |||||||||||||
Maturity | Cost | Total | Value | Total | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
One year or less
|
$ | 195,739 | 12.9 | % | $ | 195,807 | 12.5 | % | ||||||||
After one year through five years
|
832,792 | 55.0 | 865,405 | 55.4 | ||||||||||||
After five years through ten years
|
253,257 | 16.8 | 267,737 | 17.1 | ||||||||||||
After ten years
|
139,906 | 9.3 | 142,464 | 9.1 | ||||||||||||
1,421,694 | 1,471,413 | |||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
90,263 | 6.0 | 92,770 | 5.9 | ||||||||||||
$ | 1,511,957 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,564,183 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
Our equity securities at December 31, 2002 and 2001 consisted of investments in various industry groups as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||
Fair | Fair | |||||||||||||||
Cost | Value | Cost | Value | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Banks, trust and insurance companies
|
$ | 6,991 | $ | 8,634 | $ | 6,247 | $ | 5,951 | ||||||||
Industrial, miscellaneous and all other
|
55,199 | 65,767 | 46,864 | 50,409 | ||||||||||||
$ | 62,190 | $ | 74,401 | $ | 53,111 | $ | 56,360 | |||||||||
12
Our investment results for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 were as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Net investment income(1)(2)
|
$ | 91,333 | $ | 106,364 | $ | 100,193 | ||||||
Average invested assets(1)
|
$ | 2,704,925 | $ | 2,196,860 | $ | 1,649,951 | ||||||
Effective return on average invested assets(1)
|
3.4 | % | 4.8 | % | 6.1 | % |
(1) | Excludes investments in real estate. |
(2) | Net investment income as reported in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings has been adjusted in the presentation above to provide the tax equivalent yield on tax exempt investments and to exclude net realized gains (losses) on the sale of investments and other assets. Net realized gains (losses) totaled $12.0 million, $6.3 million and ($201) in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. |
Employees
As of December 31, 2002, we had approximately 20,800 full-time equivalent employees. We believe that our relations with employees are generally good.
Risk Factors
The risk factors listed in this section and other factors noted herein or incorporated by reference could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.
Our revenues may decline during periods when the demand for our products decreases.
In the title insurance industry, revenues are directly affected by the level of real estate activity and the average price of real estate sales on both a national and local basis. Real estate sales are directly affected by changes in the cost of financing purchases of real estate i.e., mortgage interest rates. Other macroeconomic factors affecting real estate activity include, but are not limited to, demand for housing, employment levels, family income levels and general economic conditions. Because these factors can change dramatically, revenue levels in the title insurance industry can also change dramatically. For example, beginning in late 1995 and into 1998, the level of real estate activity increased, including refinancing transactions, new home sales and resales, due in part to decreases in mortgage interest rates. Stable mortgage interest rates and strength in the real estate market, especially in California and throughout the West Coast, contributed to very positive conditions for the title insurance industry throughout 1997 and 1998. However, during the second half of 1999 and through 2000, steady interest rate increases caused by actions taken by the Federal Reserve Board resulted in a significant decline in refinancing transactions. As a result, the market shifted from a refinance-driven market in 1998 to a more traditional market driven by new home purchases and resales in 1999 and 2000. However, beginning in January 2001 and continuing through the fourth quarter of 2002, interest rates have been reduced by 525 basis points, bringing interest rates down to their lowest level in recent history, which again has significantly increased the volume of refinance activity.
Historically, real estate transactions have produced seasonal revenue levels for title insurers. The first calendar quarter is typically the weakest quarter in terms of revenue due to the generally low volume of home sales during January and February. The fourth calendar quarter is typically the strongest in terms of revenue due to commercial entities desiring to complete transactions by year-end. Significant changes in interest rates may alter these traditional seasonal patterns due to the effect the cost of financing has on the volume of real estate transactions.
Our revenues in future periods will continue to be subject to these and other factors which are beyond our control and, as a result, are likely to fluctuate.
13
As a holding company, we depend on distributions from our subsidiaries, and if distributions from our subsidiaries are materially impaired, our ability to declare and pay dividends may be adversely affected.
We are a holding company whose primary assets are the securities of our operating subsidiaries. Our ability to pay dividends is dependent on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or repay funds to us. If our operating subsidiaries are not able to pay dividends or repay funds to us, we may not be able to declare and pay dividends to you.
Our title insurance and home warranty subsidiaries must comply with state and federal laws which require them to maintain minimum amounts of working capital, surplus and reserves, and place restrictions on the amount of dividends that they can distribute to us. During 2002, approximately 91.1% of our year-to-date revenues was derived from subsidiaries engaged in these regulated businesses. Compliance with these laws will limit the amounts our regulated subsidiaries can dividend to us. During 2003, our title insurance subsidiaries can pay dividends or make other distributions to us of $114.9 million.
Our entering into new business lines subjects us to associated risks, such as the diversion of management attention, difficulty integrating operations and lack of experience in operating such businesses.
We have acquired, and may in the future acquire, businesses in industries with which management is less familiar than we are with the title insurance industry. For example, on January 28, 2003, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with ALLTEL whereby we will acquire from ALLTEL its financial services division, AIS. Also, in the last three years, we have expanded the range and amount of real estate related services we provide, began underwriting home warranty policies, invested in restaurant businesses, expanded our commercial title insurance business and considered acquiring underwriters of other lines of insurance products. These activities involve risks that could adversely affect our operating results, such as diversion of managements attention, integration of the operations, systems and personnel of the new businesses and lack of substantial experience in operating such businesses.
Difficulties we may encounter managing our growth could adversely affect our results of operations.
We have historically achieved growth through a combination of developing new products and services, increasing our market share for existing products, and acquisitions. Part of our strategy is to pursue opportunities to diversify and expand our operations by acquiring or making investments in other companies. The success of each acquisition will depend upon:
| our ability to integrate the acquired business operations, products and personnel; | |
| our ability to retain key personnel of the acquired businesses; and | |
| our ability to expand our financial and management controls and reporting systems and procedures. |
Our subsidiaries that engage in insurance related businesses must comply with additional regulations. These regulations may impede, or impose burdensome conditions on, our rate increases or other actions that we might want to take to increase the revenues of our subsidiaries.
Our title insurance business is subject to extensive regulation by state insurance authorities in each state in which we operate. These agencies have broad administrative and supervisory power relating to the following, among other matters:
| licensing requirements; | |
| trade and marketing practices; | |
| accounting and financing practices; | |
| capital and surplus requirements; | |
| the amount of dividends and other payments made by insurance subsidiaries; | |
| investment practices; |
14
| rate schedules; | |
| deposits of securities for the benefit of policyholders; | |
| establishing reserves; and | |
| regulation of reinsurance. |
Most states also regulate insurance holding companies like us with respect to acquisitions, changes of control and the terms of transactions with our affiliates. These regulations may impede or impose burdensome conditions on our rate increases or other actions that we may want to take to enhance our operating results, and could affect our ability to pay dividends on our common stock. In addition, we may incur significant costs in the course of complying with regulatory requirements. We cannot assure you that future legislative or regulatory changes will not adversely affect our business operations.
We face competition in our industry from traditional title insurers and from new entrants with alternative products.
The title insurance industry is highly competitive. According to Corporate Development Services, the top five title insurance companies accounted for 88% of net premiums collected in 2001. Over 40 independent title insurance companies accounted for the remaining 12% of the market. The number and size of competing companies varies in the different geographic areas in which we conduct our business. In our principal markets, competitors include other major title underwriters such as First American Corporation, LandAmerica Financial Group, Inc., Old Republic International Corporation and Stewart Information Services Corporation, as well as numerous smaller title insurance companies and independent agency operations at the regional and local level. These smaller companies may expand into other markets in which we compete. Also, the removal of regulatory barriers might result in new competitors entering the title insurance business, and those new competitors may include diversified financial services companies that have greater financial resources than we do and possess other competitive advantages. Competition among the major title insurance companies, expansion by smaller regional companies and any new entrants with alternative products could affect our business operations and financial condition.
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
The information contained in this Form 10-K contains forward looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on managements beliefs as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management. Because such statements are based on expectations as to future economic performance and are not statements of fact, actual results may differ materially from those projected. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Important factors that may affect these projections or expectations include, but are not limited to:
| general political, economic and business conditions, including the possibility of intensified international hostilities, acts of terrorism, interest rate fluctuations and general volatility in the capital markets; | |
| changes in the performance of the real estate markets; | |
| the impact of competitive products and pricing; | |
| success of operating initiatives; | |
| adverse publicity; | |
| the ability to identify businesses to be acquired; | |
| availability of qualified personnel; | |
| employee benefits costs; |
15
| changes in, or the failure to comply with, government regulations; and | |
| other risks detailed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
All of these factors are difficult to predict and many are beyond our control. Accordingly, while we believe these forward-looking statements to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that they will approximate actual experience or that expectations derived from them will be realized. When used in our documents or oral presentations, the words anticipate, believe, estimate, objective, projection, forecast, goal, or similar words are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
Additional Information
Our website address is www.fnf.com. We make available free of charge on or through our website our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. However, the information found on our website is not part of this or any other report.
Item 2. Properties
The majority of the branch offices are leased from third parties. We own the remaining branch offices. See Note J to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
As of December 31, 2002, we leased office and storage space as follows:
Number of | ||||
Locations(1) | ||||
California
|
427 | |||
Texas
|
128 | |||
Arizona
|
101 | |||
Illinois
|
81 | |||
Florida
|
69 | |||
Washington
|
50 | |||
Michigan
|
37 | |||
Oregon
|
43 | |||
Ohio
|
26 | |||
Indiana
|
22 | |||
New York
|
25 | |||
North Carolina
|
23 | |||
Nevada
|
21 | |||
Colorado
|
19 | |||
Tennessee
|
16 | |||
New Jersey
|
14 | |||
Minnesota, Pennsylvania and Missouri
|
10 | |||
Virginia
|
9 | |||
Kansas
|
7 | |||
Hawaii
|
6 | |||
Georgia and Massachusetts
|
5 | |||
Louisiana and New Mexico
|
4 | |||
Washington D.C. and Rhode Island
|
3 | |||
Montana, South Carolina, Wisconsin, Kentucky,
Alabama and Canada
|
2 | |||
New Hampshire, Idaho, Delaware, Maine,
Mississippi and Oklahoma
|
1 |
(1) | Represents the number of locations in each state listed. |
16
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in various pending and threatened litigation matters related to our operations, some of which include claims for punitive or exemplary damages. We believe that no actions, other than those listed below, depart from customary litigation incidental to our business and that the resolution of all such litigation will not have a material adverse effect on us.
As previously disclosed in our prior Securities and Exchange Commission filings, we were named in class action lawsuits alleging irregularities and violations of law in connection with title and escrow practices. Three lawsuits are currently pending. Four previously filed lawsuits have been settled or dismissed. The three pending suits are filed by private parties in State court in Los Angeles. On October 8, 2002, we reached a settlement with the Attorney General and the State of California in the defendant class lawsuit filed against us and our principal competitors on behalf of the entire title and escrow industry in California. Under the terms of the settlement, we will pay $5.1 million to the California Attorney General and a total of up to $26.0 million in the form of (i) cash payments to former escrow customers that meet certain eligibility requirements and file timely claims, and (ii) discounts on future escrow and title insurance services to eligible customers as agreed to in the settlement. In reaching the settlement, we denied any liability or wrongdoing. The settlement is contingent upon certain verification procedures which are currently ongoing.
Three lawsuits, captioned Schneider v. Fidelity National Financial, Inc., et al. (Case No. 03CC00017), Rossi v. Michael C. Lowther, et al. (Case No. 03CC0021) and Miller v. Michael C. Lowther, et al. (Case No. 03CC00018), have been filed in Orange County Superior Court naming as defendants Fidelity and the members of the Board of Directors of ANFI. The complaints seek class action status and allege breach of fiduciary duty in connection with the approval of the merger by ANFIs directors. We believe the lawsuits are without merit.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
We did not submit any matters to a vote of security holders in the fourth quarter of 2002.
17
PART II
Item 5. | Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters |
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol FNF. The following table shows, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices of our common stock, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, and the amounts of dividends per share declared on our common stock.
Dividends | |||||||||||||
High | Low | Declared | |||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2002
|
|||||||||||||
First quarter
|
$ | 25.44 | $ | 21.70 | $ | .09 | |||||||
Second quarter
|
31.74 | 23.96 | .10 | ||||||||||
Third quarter
|
32.32 | 24.55 | .12 | ||||||||||
Fourth quarter
|
33.61 | 26.79 | .12 | ||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2001
|
|||||||||||||
First quarter
|
$ | 30.53 | $ | 21.55 | $ | .08 | |||||||
Second quarter
|
23.14 | 16.61 | .08 | ||||||||||
Third quarter
|
24.80 | 18.55 | .09 | ||||||||||
Fourth quarter
|
25.06 | 20.19 | .09 |
The foregoing amounts have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to a 10% stock dividend in August 2001 and May 2002.
On March 18, 2003, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $33.39 per share. As of March 18, 2003, we had approximately 1,730 stockholders of record.
Our current dividend policy anticipates the payment of quarterly dividends in the future. The declaration and payment of dividends will be in the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be dependent upon our future earnings, financial condition and capital requirements. Our ability to declare and pay dividends is also subject to our compliance with the financial covenants contained in our existing credit agreement and further described below.
Since we are a holding company, our ability to pay dividends will depend largely on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to us, and the ability of our title insurance subsidiaries to do so is subject to, among other factors, their compliance with applicable insurance regulations. During 2003, our title insurance subsidiaries can pay dividends or make other distributions to us of $114.9 million. In addition to regulatory restrictions, our ability to declare dividends is subject to restrictions under our existing credit agreement. We do not believe the restrictions contained in our credit agreement will, in the foreseeable future, adversely affect our ability to pay cash dividends at the current dividend rate.
18
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Share and per share data has been retroactively adjusted for stock dividends and splits since our inception. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year amounts to conform with the 2002 presentation.
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | (1)(2) | (3) | 1999 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share and other data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Title insurance premiums
|
$ | 3,547,729 | $ | 2,694,479 | $ | 1,946,159 | $ | 939,452 | $ | 910,278 | ||||||||||||
Escrow and other title related fees
|
970,700 | 728,406 | 459,121 | 206,570 | 215,254 | |||||||||||||||||
Real estate related services
|
435,347 | 287,063 | 166,718 | 67,844 | 69,970 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest and investment income
|
78,017 | 93,105 | 87,392 | 28,695 | 22,396 | |||||||||||||||||
Realized gains and (losses), net
|
12,019 | 6,349 | (201 | ) | 3,350 | 22,106 | ||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
38,828 | 64,705 | 82,805 | 109,943 | 53,376 | |||||||||||||||||
5,082,640 | 3,874,107 | 2,741,994 | 1,355,854 | 1,293,380 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Personnel costs
|
1,476,430 | 1,187,177 | 845,349 | 407,078 | 394,284 | |||||||||||||||||
Other operating expenses
|
1,021,893 | 829,433 | 624,087 | 334,578 | 260,297 | |||||||||||||||||
Agent commissions
|
1,521,573 | 1,098,328 | 884,498 | 423,675 | 385,649 | |||||||||||||||||
Provision for claim losses
|
177,391 | 134,724 | 97,322 | 52,713 | 59,294 | |||||||||||||||||
Goodwill amortization
|
| 54,155 | 35,003 | 6,638 | 3,129 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
34,053 | 46,569 | 59,374 | 15,626 | 17,024 | |||||||||||||||||
4,231,340 | 3,350,386 | 2,545,633 | 1,240,308 | 1,119,677 | ||||||||||||||||||
Earnings before income taxes, minority interest
and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
|
851,300 | 523,721 | 196,361 | 115,546 | 173,703 | |||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense
|
306,468 | 209,488 | 86,624 | 46,065 | 68,874 | |||||||||||||||||
Earnings before minority interest and cumulative
effect of a change in accounting principle
|
544,832 | 314,233 | 109,737 | 69,481 | 104,829 | |||||||||||||||||
Minority interest
|
13,115 | 3,048 | 1,422 | (1,372 | ) | (863 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Earnings before cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle
|
531,717 | 311,185 | 108,315 | 70,853 | 105,692 | |||||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle, net of income taxes
|
| (5,709 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
$ | 531,717 | $ | 305,476 | $ | 108,315 | $ | 70,853 | $ | 105,692 | ||||||||||||
Per Share Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share before cumulative effect
of a change in accounting principle
|
$ | 5.58 | $ | 3.31 | $ | 1.52 | $ | 1.96 | $ | 3.13 | ||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle, net of income taxes, basic basis
|
| (.06 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Basic net earnings per share
|
$ | 5.58 | $ | 3.25 | $ | 1.52 | $ | 1.96 | $ | 3.13 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic basis
|
95,371 | 94,048 | 71,173 | 36,072 | 33,784 | |||||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share before cumulative
effect of a change in accounting principle
|
$ | 5.38 | $ | 3.21 | $ | 1.47 | $ | 1.87 | $ | 2.67 | ||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle, net of income taxes, diluted basis
|
| (.06 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Diluted net earnings per share
|
$ | 5.38 | $ | 3.15 | $ | 1.47 | $ | 1.87 | $ | 2.67 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted basis
|
98,815 | 96,865 | 73,733 | 37,916 | 40,503 | |||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared per share
|
$ | .43 | $ | .34 | $ | .32 | $ | .26 | $ | .22 |
19
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | (1)(2) | (3) | 1999 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share and other data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments(4)
|
$ | 2,565,608 | $ | 1,823,512 | $ | 1,685,331 | $ | 506,916 | $ | 519,332 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents(5)
|
482,600 | 542,620 | 262,955 | 38,569 | 42,492 | |||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
5,245,744 | 4,415,998 | 3,833,985 | 1,042,546 | 969,470 | |||||||||||||||||
Notes payable
|
493,458 | 565,690 | 791,430 | 226,359 | 214,624 | |||||||||||||||||
Reserve for claim losses
|
887,973 | 881,053 | 907,482 | 239,962 | 224,534 | |||||||||||||||||
Minority interests and preferred stock of
subsidiary
|
131,797 | 47,166 | 5,592 | 4,613 | 1,532 | |||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity
|
2,253,936 | 1,638,870 | 1,106,737 | 432,494 | 396,740 | |||||||||||||||||
Other Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Orders opened by direct operations
|
3,228,300 | 2,635,200 | 1,352,000 | 743,000 | 987,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Orders closed by direct operations
|
2,290,300 | 1,770,600 | 971,000 | 551,000 | 670,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Provision for claim losses to title insurance
premiums
|
5.0 | % | 5.0 | % | 5.0 | % | 5.6 | % | 6.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Title related revenue(6):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage direct operations
|
57.1 | % | 59.0 | % | 52.8 | % | 53.6 | % | 56.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Percentage agency operations
|
42.9 | % | 41.0 | % | 47.2 | % | 46.4 | % | 43.1 | % |
(1) | Our financial results for the year ended December 31, 2001 include the results of the former operations of Vista for the period from August 1, 2001, the acquisition date, through December 31, 2001. In the fourth quarter of 2001, we recorded certain charges totaling $10.0 million, after applicable taxes, relating to the discontinuation of small-ticket lease origination at FNF Capital and the wholesale international long distance business at Micro General. |
(2) | During 2001, we recorded a $5.7 million, after-tax charge, reflected as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, as a result of adopting Emerging Issues Task Force No. 99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets, (EITF 99-20). |
(3) | Our financial results for the year ended December 31, 2000 include the operations of Chicago Title for the period from March 20, 2000, the merger date, through December 31, 2000. In the first quarter of 2000, we recorded certain charges totaling $13.4 million, after applicable taxes, relating to the revaluation of non-title assets and the write-off of obsolete software. |
(4) | Investments as of December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 include securities pledged to secure trust deposits of $474.9 million, $319.1 million and $459.4 million, respectively. |
(5) | Cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 include cash pledged to secure trust deposits of $295.1 million, $367.9 million and $132.1 million, respectively. |
(6) | Includes title insurance premiums and escrow and other title related fees. |
20
Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Selected quarterly financial data is as follows:
Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, | June 30,(2) | September 30, | December 31,(3) | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
2002
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$ | 1,066,860 | $ | 1,142,964 | $ | 1,282,847 | $ | 1,589,969 | ||||||||
Earnings before income taxes and minority interest
|
161,543 | 178,756 | 230,248 | 280,753 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
100,985 | 112,286 | 143,511 | 174,935 | ||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share
|
1.07 | 1.17 | 1.50 | 1.83 | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share
|
1.03 | 1.13 | 1.45 | 1.77 | ||||||||||||
Dividends paid per share
|
.09 | .09 | .10 | .12 | ||||||||||||
2001(1)
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$ | 777,864 | $ | 961,548 | $ | 1,002,618 | $ | 1,132,077 | ||||||||
Earnings before income taxes, minority interest
and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
|
78,140 | 153,049 | 139,034 | 153,498 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
44,992 | 84,122 | 84,082 | 92,280 | ||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share
|
.49 | .89 | .89 | .98 | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share
|
.47 | .87 | .86 | .95 | ||||||||||||
Dividends paid per share
|
.08 | .08 | .08 | .09 |
(1) | Our financial results for the year ended December 31, 2001 include the results of the former operations of Vista for the period from August 1, 2001, the acquisition date, through December 31, 2001. |
(2) | In the second quarter of 2001, we recorded a $5.7 million, after-tax charge, reflected as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, as a result of adopting EITF 99-20. |
(3) | In the fourth quarter of 2001, we recorded certain charges totaling $10.0 million, after applicable taxes, relating to the discontinuation of small-ticket lease origination at FNF Capital and the wholesale international long distance business at Micro General. |
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto and Selected Financial Data included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Factors Affecting Comparability. Our Consolidated Statements of Earnings for 2001 include the results of the former operations of Vista for the period from August 1, 2001, the acquisition date, through December 31, 2001 and include a full year of operations of Chicago Title as compared to a partial year in 2000. As a result, year over year comparisons may not be meaningful. In addition, during the second quarter of 2001, we recorded a $5.7 million, after-tax charge, reflected as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, as a result of adopting EITF 99-20. Also, in the fourth quarter of 2001, we recorded certain charges totaling $10.0 million, after applicable taxes. These charges relate to the discontinuation of small-ticket lease origination at FNF Capital and the wholesale international long distance business at Micro General.
Our Consolidated Statements of Earnings for 2000 include the results of operations of Chicago Title for the period from March 20, 2000, the merger date, through December 31, 2000. In 2000, we reviewed our existing non-title operations in connection with the merger and related transition and integration. As a result, during the first quarter of 2000 we recorded certain charges totaling $13.4 million, after applicable taxes. These charges primarily relate to the revaluation of non-title assets, including our investment in Express Network, Inc., which was sold in the second quarter of 2000, and existing goodwill associated with Express Network and the write-off of obsolete software.
21
Overview. The following table presents certain financial data for the years indicated:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Total revenue
|
$ | 5,082,640 | $ | 3,874,107 | $ | 2,741,994 | ||||||
Total expenses
|
$ | 4,231,340 | $ | 3,350,386 | $ | 2,545,633 | ||||||
Net earnings
|
$ | 531,717 | $ | 305,476 | $ | 108,315 | ||||||
Net earnings for the year ended December 31, 2002 were $531.7 million, or $5.38 per diluted share as compared with net earnings for the corresponding periods in 2001 and 2000 of $305.5 million, or $3.15 per diluted share and $108.3 million, or $1.47 per diluted share, respectively.
Revenue. The following table presents the components of our revenue:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Title insurance premiums
|
$ | 3,547,729 | $ | 2,694,479 | $ | 1,946,159 | |||||||
Escrow and other title related fees
|
970,700 | 728,406 | 459,121 | ||||||||||
Real estate related services
|
435,347 | 287,063 | 166,718 | ||||||||||
Interest and investment income
|
78,017 | 93,105 | 87,392 | ||||||||||
Realized gains and (losses), net
|
12,019 | 6,349 | (201 | ) | |||||||||
Other income
|
38,828 | 64,705 | 82,805 | ||||||||||
Total revenue
|
$ | 5,082,640 | $ | 3,874,107 | $ | 2,741,994 | |||||||
Orders opened by direct operations
|
3,228,300 | 2,635,200 | 1,352,000 | ||||||||||
Orders closed by direct operations
|
2,290,300 | 1,770,600 | 971,000 |
Title insurance revenue is closely related to the level of real estate activity and the average price of real estate sales on both a national and local basis. Real estate sales are directly affected by changes in the cost of financing purchases of real estate i.e., mortgage interest rates. Other macroeconomic factors affecting real estate activity include, but are not limited to, demand for housing, employment levels, family income levels and general economic conditions. Because these factors can change dramatically, revenue levels in the title insurance industry can also change dramatically. For example, beginning in late 1995 and into 1998, the level of real estate activity increased, including refinancing transactions, new home sales and resales, due in part to decreases in mortgage interest rates. Stable mortgage interest rates and strength in the real estate market, especially in California and throughout the West Coast, contributed to very positive conditions for the title insurance industry throughout 1997 and 1998. However, during the second half of 1999 and through 2000, steady interest rate increases caused by actions taken by the Federal Reserve Board resulted in a significant decline in refinancing transactions. As a result, the market shifted from a refinance-driven market in 1998 to a more traditional market driven by new home purchases and resales in 1999 and 2000. However, beginning in January 2001 and continuing through the fourth quarter of 2002, interest rates have been reduced by 525 basis points, bringing interest rates down to their lowest level in recent history, which again has significantly increased the volume of refinance activity.
Total revenue in 2002 increased $1,208.5 million to $5,082.6 million, an increase of 31.2% over 2001. Total revenue in 2001 increased $1,132.1 million, or 41.3% to $3,874.1 million from $2,742.0 million in 2000. The increase in total revenue in 2002 and 2001 is due to increases in real estate and refinance activity as a result of decreasing interest rates. The inclusion of the Chicago Title operations for a full year in 2001 versus a partial year in 2000 also contributed to the increase in revenue in 2001, as compared with 2000. Further, the increased real estate activity combined with acquisitions of real estate related service companies and the integration of those real estate related service operations into our core businesses in 2001, also contributed to increased revenue in both 2002 and 2001.
22
Title insurance premiums increased 31.7% to $3,547.7 million in 2002. In 2001, title insurance premiums increased to $2,694.5 million from $1,946.2 million in 2000. These increases in 2002 and 2001 are due to increases in resale and refinance activity as a result of the decline in interest rates. The increase in resale and refinance activity in 2002 and 2001 has been partially offset by a decrease in the average fee per file. The decrease in fee per file is consistent with the overall increased level of refinance activity experienced during 2002 and 2001.
The following table presents the percentages of title insurance premiums generated by our direct and agency operations:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct
|
$ | 1,610,792 | 45.4 | % | $ | 1,291,276 | 47.9 | % | $ | 811,621 | 41.7 | % | |||||||||||||
Agency
|
1,936,937 | 54.6 | 1,403,203 | 52.1 | 1,134,538 | 58.3 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total title insurance premiums
|
$ | 3,547,729 | 100.0 | % | $ | 2,694,479 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,946,159 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Trends in escrow and other title related fees are primarily related to title insurance activity generated by our direct operations. Escrow and other title related fees during the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, fluctuated in a pattern generally consistent with the fluctuation in direct title insurance premiums and order counts. Escrow and other title related fees were $970.7 million, $728.4 million and $459.1 million, respectively, during 2002, 2001 and 2000.
Revenues from real estate related services generally trend closely with the level and mix of business, as well as the performance of our title related subsidiaries. Revenues from real estate related services in 2002, 2001 and 2000 were $435.3 million, $287.1 million and $166.7 million, respectively. The increase in revenue from real estate related services in 2002 is primarily the result of increases in revenue from our property appraisal services, real estate tax services, field services, mortgage loan fulfillment services (HFN), which was acquired in the second quarter of 2002 and collateral risk assessment and valuation services (Hansen), which was acquired by FNIS in the second quarter of 2002. In addition, revenue from real estate related services includes $52.1 million of revenue from the former operations of Vista for 2002, as compared with $27.7 million in 2001. The increase in revenues from real estate related services in 2001 is primarily the result of increases in revenue from our property appraisal services, real estate tax services, field services, home warranty insurance, property records business (IDM), which was acquired in the first quarter of 2001, and multiple listing services business (Risco), which was acquired in the second quarter of 2001. In addition, revenues from real estate related services include the revenues of the former operations of Vista from the period August 1, 2001, the acquisition date, through December 31, 2001. Further, the increase in revenue in 2001 is also due to the inclusion of Chicago Title operations for a full year in 2001 versus a partial year in 2000.
Interest and investment income levels are primarily a function of securities markets, interest rates and the amount of cash available for investment. Interest and investment income in 2002 was $78.0 million, compared with $93.1 million in 2001, a decrease of $15.1 million, or 16.2%. Average invested assets, excluding real estate, increased 23.1% to $2,704.9 million, from $2,196.9 million in 2001. The tax equivalent yield in 2002, excluding realized gains and losses was 3.4% as compared with 4.8% in 2001 and 6.1% in 2000. The decrease in interest and investment income in 2002 as compared with 2001, despite the increase in average invested assets, is due to a decrease in interest income reflecting lower interest rates in 2002 as compared with 2001. Interest and investment income increased $5.7 million, or 6.5% in 2001 to $93.1 million from $87.4 million in 2000. Average invested assets, excluding real estate, increased 33.1% in 2001 from $1,650.0 million in 2000. The increase in interest and investment income in 2001 from 2000 is the result of increased interest and dividend income generated by the increased average invested asset base as a result of the inclusion of Chicago Title for a full year in 2001 versus a partial year in 2000.
Net realized gains and (losses) for 2002, 2001 and 2000 were $12.0 million, $6.3 million and $(201), respectively. Net realized gains in 2002 includes a $3.1 million gain recognized on our investment in Santa
23
Other income represents revenue generated by Micro General, our majority-owned information-services subsidiary, which was merged with FNIS on July 9, 2002 (see Recent Developments) and FNF Capital, our equipment-leasing subsidiary. Other income was $38.8 million in 2002, $64.7 million in 2001 and $82.8 million in 2000. The decrease in other income from 2001 to 2002 is due to the discontinuation in the fourth quarter of 2001 of FNF Capitals small-ticket lease origination business and Micro Generals wholesale international long distance business. The decrease in other income from 2000 to 2001 is primarily due to decreases in externally generated revenue by Micro General.
Expenses. The following table presents the components of our expenses:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Personnel costs
|
$ | 1,476,430 | $ | 1,187,177 | $ | 845,349 | |||||||
Other operating expenses
|
1,021,893 | 829,433 | 624,087 | ||||||||||
Agent commissions
|
1,521,573 | 1,098,328 | 884,498 | ||||||||||
Provision for claim losses
|
177,391 | 134,724 | 97,322 | ||||||||||
Goodwill amortization
|
| 54,155 | 35,003 | ||||||||||
Interest expense
|
34,053 | 46,569 | 59,374 | ||||||||||
Total expenses
|
$ | 4,231,340 | $ | 3,350,386 | $ | 2,545,633 | |||||||
Our operating expenses consist primarily of personnel costs, other operating expenses and agent commissions, which are incurred as orders are received and processed. Title insurance premiums, escrow and other title related fees are generally recognized as income at the time the underlying transaction closes. As a result, revenue lags approximately 60-90 days behind expenses and therefore gross margins may fluctuate. The changes in the market environment, mix of business between direct and agency operations and the contributions from our various business units have impacted margins and net earnings. We have implemented programs and have taken necessary actions to maintain expense levels consistent with revenue streams. However, a short time lag does exist in reducing variable costs and certain fixed costs are incurred regardless of revenue levels.
Personnel costs include base salaries, commissions and bonuses paid to employees, and are one of our most significant operating expenses. These costs generally fluctuate with the level of orders opened and closed and with the mix of revenue. Personnel costs totaled $1,476.4 million, $1,187.2 million and $845.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Personnel costs as a percentage of total revenue have remained relatively consistent over the three-year period ended December 31, 2002. Those percentages were 29.1% in 2002, 30.6% in 2001 and 30.8% in 2000. We have taken significant measures to maintain appropriate personnel levels and costs relative to the volume and mix of business while maintaining customer service standards and quality controls. We will continue to monitor prevailing market conditions and will adjust personnel costs in accordance with activity.
Other operating expenses consist primarily of facilities expenses, title plant maintenance, premium taxes (which insurance underwriters are required to pay on title premiums in lieu of franchise and other state taxes), postage and courier services, computer services (including personnel costs associated with information technology support), professional services, advertising expenses, general insurance, depreciation and trade and notes receivable allowances. We continue to be committed to cost control measures. In response to market conditions, we have implemented aggressive cost control programs in order to maintain operating expenses at levels consistent with the levels of revenue. However, certain fixed costs are incurred regardless of revenue
24
Agent commissions represent the portion of premiums retained by agents pursuant to the terms of their respective agency contracts. Agent commissions and the resulting percentage of agent premiums we retain vary according to regional differences in real estate closing practices and state regulations.
The following table illustrates the relationship of agent premiums and agent commissions:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agent premiums
|
$ | 1,936,937 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,403,203 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,134,538 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Agent commissions
|
1,521,573 | 78.6 | 1,098,328 | 78.3 | 884,498 | 78.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Premiums we retain
|
$ | 415,364 | 21.4 | % | $ | 304,875 | 21.7 | % | $ | 250,040 | 22.0 | % | |||||||||||||
The provision for claim losses includes an estimate of anticipated title claims and escrow losses. The estimate of anticipated title and title related claims is accrued as a percentage of title premium revenue based on our historical loss experience and other relevant factors. We monitor our claims loss experience on a continual basis and adjust the provision for claim losses accordingly. We believe that as a result of our underwriting and claims handling practices, as well as the refinancing business of the current and prior years, we will maintain the claim loss trends we have experienced over the past several years. As such, our claim loss provision as a percentage of total title premiums was 5.0% in 2002, 2001 and 2000.
A summary of the reserve for claim losses follows:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Beginning balance
|
$ | 881,053 | $ | 907,482 | $ | 239,962 | |||||||||
Reserves assumed
|
| | 669,837 | (1) | |||||||||||
Claim loss provision related to:
|
|||||||||||||||
Current year
|
207,290 | 161,669 | 108,985 | ||||||||||||
Prior years
|
(29,899 | ) | (26,945 | ) | (11,663 | ) | |||||||||
Total claim loss provision
|
177,391 | 134,724 | 97,322 | ||||||||||||
Claims paid, net of recoupments related to:
|
|||||||||||||||
Current year
|
(10,058 | ) | (9,387 | ) | (6,479 | ) | |||||||||
Prior years
|
(160,413 | ) | (151,766 | ) | (93,160 | ) | |||||||||
Total claims paid, net of recoupments
|
(170,471 | ) | (161,153 | ) | (99,639 | ) | |||||||||
Ending balance
|
$ | 887,973 | $ | 881,053 | $ | 907,482 | |||||||||
Provision for claim losses as a percentage of
title insurance premiums
|
5.0 | % | 5.0 | % | 5.0 | % | |||||||||
(1) | In connection with the Chicago Title merger on March 20, 2000, we assumed Chicago Titles then outstanding reserve for claim losses. |
The favorable development on prior years loss reserves during 2002, 2001 and 2000 was attributable to lower than expected payment levels on recent issue years, which included periods of increased resale activity as well as a high proportion of refinance business. As a result, title policies issued in prior years have been
25
Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 was $34.1 million, $46.6 million and $59.4 million, respectively. The decrease in interest expense in 2002 is attributable to the decrease in outstanding notes payable and the decline in interest rates. The decrease in interest expense in 2001 as compared with 2000 is due to a decrease in outstanding notes payable, primarily as a result of using proceeds from our common stock offering in January 2001 and our public offering of 7.3% notes in August 2001 to pay down amounts outstanding under our credit facility. Also included in interest expense in 2001 is the write-off of $3.9 million of debt issuance costs associated with paying down our credit facility.
As a result of adopting SFAS No. 142, we did not record goodwill amortization in 2002. See Note A of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Goodwill amortization was $54.2 million in 2001 and $35.0 million in 2000. The increase in 2001 as compared with 2000 is primarily due to the acquisition of IDM and Risco and the inclusion of a full year of amortization in 2001 compared with a partial year in 2000 related to the Chicago Title merger. Also, goodwill amortization in 2001 includes an $8.0 million pretax write-off associated with the discontinuance of two businesses in the fourth quarter of 2001.
Income tax expense as a percentage of earnings before income taxes for 2002, 2001 and 2000 was 36.0%, 40.1% and 44.1%, respectively. The fluctuation in income tax expense as a percentage of earnings before income taxes is attributable to our estimate of ultimate income tax liability, and the characteristics of net earnings i.e., operating income versus investment income, as well as the elimination of goodwill amortization consistent with SFAS No. 142.
Minority interest for 2002, 2001 and 2000 was $13.1 million, $3.0 million and $1.4 million, respectively. The increase in minority interest in 2002 and 2001 is primarily attributable to increased earnings of our majority-owned subsidiaries.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows. Our cash requirements include debt service, operating expenses, taxes, capital expenditures, systems development, treasury stock repurchases, lease securitizations, business acquisitions and dividends on our common stock. We believe that all anticipated cash requirements for current operations will be met from internally generated funds, through cash dividends from subsidiaries, cash generated by investment securities and bank borrowings through public debt offerings and existing credit facilities. Our short- and long-term liquidity requirements are monitored regularly to match cash inflows with cash requirements. We forecast the daily needs of all of our subsidiaries and periodically review their short- and long-term projected sources and uses of funds, as well as the asset, liability, investment and cash flow assumptions underlying these projections.
Our two significant sources of internally generated funds are dividends and distributions from our subsidiaries. As a holding company, we receive cash from our subsidiaries in the form of dividends and as reimbursement for operating and other administrative expenses we incur. The reimbursements are executed within the guidelines of management agreements among us and our subsidiaries. Our insurance subsidiaries are restricted by state regulation in their ability to pay dividends and make distributions. Each state of domicile regulates the extent to which our title underwriters can pay dividends or make other distributions to us. During 2003, our title insurance subsidiaries can pay dividends or make other distributions to us of $114.9 million. Our underwritten title companies, real estate related service companies and FNIS, collect revenue and pay operating expenses. However, they are not regulated to the same extent as our insurance subsidiaries. Positive cash flow from these subsidiaries is invested primarily in cash and cash equivalents.
Seasonality. Historically, real estate transactions have produced seasonal revenue levels for title insurers. The first calendar quarter is typically the weakest quarter in terms of revenue due to the generally low volume of home sales during January and February. The fourth calendar quarter is typically the strongest in terms of revenue due to commercial entities desiring to complete transactions by year-end. Significant changes in interest rates may alter these traditional seasonal patterns due to the effect the cost of financing has on the volume of real estate transactions.
26
Financing. In connection with the Chicago Title merger, we entered into a syndicated credit agreement. The credit agreement provides for three distinct credit facilities:
| $100.0 million, 18 month revolving credit facility due September 30, 2001, which was repaid and terminated on January 24, 2001; | |
| $250.0 million, 6 year revolving credit facility due March 19, 2006; and | |
| $450.0 million term loan facility with a 6 year amortization period, due March 19, 2006. |
The credit agreement bears interest at a variable rate of interest based on the debt ratings assigned to us by certain independent agencies, and is unsecured. In May 2002, the interest rate was reduced to LIBOR plus 1.00% from LIBOR plus 1.125% as a result of an upgrade in our debt ratings. Amounts borrowed under the credit agreement were used to pay the cash portion of the merger consideration, to refinance previously existing indebtedness, to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the merger and to fund other general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2002, $120.3 million was outstanding under our credit agreement and we have $250.0 million in borrowings available to us.
The credit agreement and other debt facilities impose certain affirmative and negative covenants on us relating to current debt ratings, certain financial ratios related to liquidity, net worth, capitalization, investments, acquisitions and restricted payments, and certain dividend restrictions. We are in compliance with all of our debt covenants as of December 31, 2002.
On March 11, 2003, we issued $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.25% notes. We received proceeds of approximately $246.1 million, after expenses, which will be used to pay a portion of the $1,050.0 million purchase price for AIS (see Recent Developments). Interest is payable semiannually and the notes are due in March 2013.
On August 20, 2001, we issued $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.3% notes. We received net proceeds of $247.0 million, after expenses, which were used to pay down a portion of the $450.0 million, 6-year term loan facility. Interest is payable semiannually and the notes are due in August 2011.
Contractual Obligations. Our financing obligations generally include our credit agreement and other debt facilities, including the $250.0 million, 5.25% notes we issued on March 11, 2003 (see Recent Developments), and operating lease payments on certain of our premises and equipment. Our purchase obligations for business acquisitions relate to the acquisition of LSI and Bankers during the first quarter of 2003 for approximately $75.0 million and $41.6 million, respectively and the January 28, 2003 stock purchase agreement we entered into with ALLTEL for the purchase of AIS for $1,050.0 million (see Recent Developments). As of December 31, 2002, our required annual payments relating to these contractual obligations are as follows:
2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | Thereafter | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes payable
|
$ | 68,541 | $ | 51,098 | $ | 47,529 | $ | 11,510 | $ | 65,638 | $ | 499,142 | $ | 743,458 | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease payments
|
100,995 | 79,270 | 60,927 | 43,710 | 29,707 | 53,644 | 368,253 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations for business acquisitions
|
1,166,635 | | | | | | 1,166,635 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,336,171 | $ | 130,368 | $ | 108,456 | $ | 55,220 | $ | 95,345 | $ | 552,786 | $ | 2,278,346 | |||||||||||||||
Capital Stock Transactions. On January 24, 2001, we issued 9,740,500 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $27.69 per share. Proceeds from this offering, net of underwriting discounts and commissions and other related expenses, were $256.3 million. Net proceeds of $100.0 million were used to repay in full and terminate the $100.0 million, 18 month revolving credit facility and net proceeds of $149.5 million were used to pay down in full the $250.0 million, 6 year revolving credit facility. The remainder of the cash proceeds are available for general corporate purposes.
On April 24, 2001, our Board of Directors authorized us to purchase up to 6,050,000 shares of our common stock. Purchases may be made by us from time to time in the open market or in block purchases or in privately negotiated transactions depending on market conditions and other factors. As part of this program,
27
On April 24, 2002, our Board of Directors approved a three-year stock repurchase program, whereby we will devote a portion of our annual cash flow from operations to the systematic repurchase of shares of our common stock. Purchases may be made by us from time to time in the open market, in block purchases or in privately negotiated transactions. As of December 31, 2002, we have repurchased a total of 2,035,170 shares of common stock for $61.2 million, or an average price of $30.08. The amount repurchased includes 439,670 shares of common stock purchased from certain of our officers and directors during the third quarter of 2002, of which 165,950 shares were accepted as full payment of notes receivable, including accrued interest. See Note E of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. In December 2002, we retired 563,570 of these shares held as treasury stock, totaling $14.3 million. Through March 18, 2003, a total of 2,546,070 shares of common stock has been repurchased for $78.0 million, or an average price of $30.62.
Additional Minimum Pension Liability Adjustment. Discount rates that are used in determining our December 31, 2002 projected benefit obligation and 2003 net periodic pension costs were based on prevailing interest rates as of December 31, 2002. Similar to prior years, we looked at the Moodys Aa corporate bond index at that date as an appropriate basis in determining the discount rate. A decrease in the discount rate used at December 31, 2002 resulted in an additional minimum pension liability adjustment. As such, we recorded a net-of-tax charge of $15.9 million to accumulated other comprehensive earnings in 2002 in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87, Employers Accounting for Pensions.
Equity Investments. Our equity investments are in public companies whose security prices are subject to significant volatility. The fair value of certain of these investments is less than our cost basis as of December 31, 2002. We currently believe these declines in fair value to be temporary based on the relatively short time these investments cost bases have exceeded their fair value and the financial condition and near-term prospects of these companies. However, should the fair value of these investments remain below our cost bases and/or the financial condition or prospects of these companies deteriorate, we may determine in a future period that this decline in fair value is other-than-temporary, requiring that an impairment loss be recognized in the period such a determination is made.
Merger of CKE Restaurants, Inc. (CKE) and Santa Barbara Restaurant Group, Inc. (SBRG). On March 1, 2002, a merger between CKE and SBRG was consummated, whereby SBRG became a wholly-owned subsidiary of CKE. As a result of the merger, holders of SBRG common stock received .491 shares of CKE common stock for each whole share of SBRG common stock.
Prior to the merger, we owned approximately 1% and 37% of the outstanding common shares of CKE and SBRG, respectively. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors also serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors at CKE and SBRG. In addition, our Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors also serves on the board of directors of both CKE and SBRG. As a result of the merger, our shares of SBRG common stock were converted into common shares of CKE and we recognized a $3.1 million gain. In addition, during the second quarter of 2002 we recorded a $3.4 million gain on the sale of a portion of our CKE common stock. In the fourth quarter of 2002, we recognized an other-than-temporary impairment loss of $11.3 million on our CKE investment. Our investment in CKE had a cost basis of $10.5 million and a fair value of $10.7 million as of December 31, 2002.
Critical Accounting Policies. The accounting policies described below are those we consider critical in preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements. Certain of these policies require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of certain contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. See Note A of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a more detailed description of our significant accounting policies that have been followed in preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements.
28
Revenue Recognition. Our direct title insurance premiums and escrow and other title related fees are recognized as revenue at the time of closing of the related transaction as the earnings process is considered complete. Our agency title insurance premiums are recognized as revenue when policies are reported to us and are recorded as revenue on a gross basis (before the deduction of agent commissions). We accrue for unreported agency title insurance premiums based on historical reporting patterns of our agents and current trends. We recognize real estate related services and other income over the period the related services are provided.
Investments. Our fixed maturities available for sale and our equity securities available for sale are recorded at fair value. Our other long-term investments are carried at cost, market or on the equity method, as appropriate. Our short-term investments are carried at amortized cost, which approximates market.
Realized gains and losses on the sale of investments are determined on the basis of the cost of the specific investments sold and are credited or charged to income on a trade date basis. Unrealized gains or losses on fixed maturity and equity securities that are classified as available for sale, net of applicable deferred income taxes (benefits), are excluded from earnings and credited or charged directly to a separate component of stockholders equity. If any unrealized losses on fixed maturity or equity securities are deemed other-than-temporary, such unrealized losses are recognized as realized losses.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. We have made acquisitions in the past that resulted in recording a significant amount of goodwill. As of December 31, 2002, goodwill was $996.6 million, of which the majority relates to goodwill recorded in connection with the Chicago Title merger in 2000. Through December 31, 2001, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, goodwill has been amortized on a straight-line basis over 7 to 20 years and has been tested for impairment on a continual basis based on the undiscounted cash flows generated by the underlying assets. In 2002, we did not record goodwill amortization as a result of adopting SFAS No. 142. As required by SFAS No. 142, we performed an annual goodwill impairment test on our reporting units and have determined that each of our reporting units has a fair value in excess of our carrying value. Accordingly, no goodwill impairment has been recorded. See Note A of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Reserve for Claim Losses. Our reserve for claim losses includes known claims as well as losses we expect to incur, net of recoupments. Each known claim is reserved based on our review as to the estimated amount of the claim and the costs required to settle the claim. Reserves for claims that are incurred but not reported are established at the time premium revenue is recognized based on historical loss experience and other factors, including industry averages, claim loss history, current legal environment, geographic considerations and type of policy written.
The reserve for claim losses also includes reserves for losses arising from the escrow, closing and disbursement functions due to fraud or operational error.
If a loss is related to a policy issued by an independent agent, we may proceed against the independent agent pursuant to the terms of the agency agreement. In any event, we may proceed against third parties who are responsible for any loss under the title insurance policy under rights of subrogation. See Note I of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Escrow Accounts. In conducting our operations, we routinely hold customers assets in escrow, pending completion of real estate transactions. Certain of these amounts are maintained in segregated bank accounts and have not been included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We have a contingent liability relating to proper disposition of these balances for our customers which amounted to $6.7 billion at December 31, 2002. As a result of holding these customers assets in escrow, we have ongoing programs for realizing economic benefits during the year through favorable borrowing and vendor arrangements with various banks. There were no investments or loans outstanding as of December 31, 2002 related to these arrangements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. During the second quarter of 2001, we adopted Emerging Issues Task Force No. 99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets, (EITF 99-20). EITF 99-20 sets forth the rules for recognizing interest income on all credit-sensitive mortgage and asset-backed securities and certain prepay-
29
In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141) and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142). SFAS No. 141 requires that all business combinations be accounted for under the purchase method. The statement further requires separate recognition of intangible assets that meet one of two criteria. The statement applies to all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001.
SFAS No. 142 requires that an intangible asset that is acquired shall be initially recognized and measured based on its fair value. The statement also provides that goodwill should not be amortized, but shall be tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate potential impairment, through a comparison of fair value to its carrying amount. SFAS No. 142 is generally effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2001 and the amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142 are effective for acquisitions subsequent to June 30, 2001. Beginning in 2002, we did not record goodwill amortization. As required by SFAS No. 142, we performed an annual goodwill impairment test on our reporting units and have determined that each of our reporting units has a fair value in excess of our carrying value, therefore no goodwill impairment has been recorded. See Note A of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In October 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No. 144) which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. While SFAS No. 144 supersedes Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of, it retains many of the fundamental provisions of that statement. SFAS No. 144 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, (SFAS No. 146). This standard is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 146 is not expected to have a material effect on our financial statements.
In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness to Others (FIN 45), an interpretation of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statements Nos. 5, 57 and 107 and a rescission of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 34. FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under guarantees issued. FIN 45 also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken. The initial recognition and measurement provisions of FIN 45 are applicable to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002 and are not expected to have a material effect on our financial statements. The disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements of interim and annual periods ended after December 15, 2002. See Note N of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure an amendment of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123 (SFAS No. 148). This statement provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. This statement also amends the disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123 and Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the
30
During 2002, the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus on Issue No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables (EITF 00-21). EITF 00-21 provides an accounting model for an approach to determine whether a vendor should divide an arrangement with multiple deliverables into separate units of accounting. EITF 00-21 requires an analysis of whether a delivered item has stand-alone value to the customer, whether there is subjective and reliable evidence of fair value for the undelivered items, and whether delivery of the undelivered items is probable and substantially in control of the vendor if the arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item. Companies are required to adopt EITF 00-21 for fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2003. Companies may apply EITF 00-21 prospectively to new arrangements initiated after the date of adoption or as a cumulative-effect adjustment. We are currently evaluating the impact of EITF 00-21.
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk |
Our Consolidated Balance Sheet includes a substantial amount of assets and liabilities whose fair values are subject to market risks. See Business Investment Policies and Investment Portfolio and Notes C and G of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The following sections address the significant market risks associated with our financial activities as of our year ended December 31, 2002.
Interest Rate Risk
Our fixed maturity investments and borrowings are subject to interest rate risk. Increases and decreases in prevailing interest rates generally translate into decreases and increases in fair values of those instruments. Additionally, fair values of interest rate sensitive instruments may be affected by the creditworthiness of the issuer, prepayment options, relative values of alternative investments, the liquidity of the instrument and other general market conditions.
Equity Price Risk
The carrying values of investments subject to equity price risks are based on quoted market prices as of the balance sheet date. Market prices are subject to fluctuation and, consequently, the amount realized in the subsequent sale of an investment may significantly differ from the reported market value. Fluctuation in the market price of a security may result from perceived changes in the underlying economic characteristics of the investee, the relative price of alternative investments and general market conditions. Furthermore, amounts realized in the sale of a particular security may be affected by the relative quantity of the security being sold.
Caution should be used in evaluating our overall market risk from the information below, since actual results could differ materially because the information was developed using estimates and assumptions as described below, and because our reserve for claim losses (representing 31% of total liabilities) is not included in the hypothetical effects.
The hypothetical effects of changes in market rates or prices on the fair values of financial instruments would have been as follows as of December 31, 2002:
a. An approximate $41.7 million net increase (decrease) in the fair value of fixed maturity securities would have occurred if interest rates had (decreased) increased by 100 basis points. The change in fair values was determined by estimating the present value of future cash flows using various models, primarily duration modeling. | |
b. An approximate $12.4 million net increase (decrease) in the fair value of equity securities would have occurred if there was a 20% price increase (decrease) in market prices. |
31
c. It is not anticipated that there would be a significant change in the fair value of other long-term investments or short-term investments if there was a change in market conditions, based on the nature and duration of the financial instruments involved. | |
d. Interest expense on average debt outstanding would have increased (decreased) approximately $5.3 million, if interest rates increased (decreased) 100 basis points. |
32
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Page | ||||
Number | ||||
Independent Auditors Report
|
34 | |||
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
December 31, 2002 and 2001
|
35 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years
ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000
|
36 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings
for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000
|
37 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders
Equity for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000
|
38 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the
years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000
|
39 | |||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
40 |
33
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
We have audited the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the related Consolidated Statements of Earnings, Comprehensive Earnings, Stockholders Equity and Cash Flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002. These Consolidated Financial Statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these Consolidated Financial Statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the Consolidated Financial Statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note A to the Consolidated Financial Statements, effective January 1, 2002, Fidelity National Financial, Inc. fully adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which resulted in a change to the method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets after they have been initially recognized in the financial statements.
KPMG LLP |
Los Angeles, California
34
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
December 31, | ||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | |||||||||
Investments:
|
||||||||||
Fixed maturities available for sale, at fair
value, at December 31, 2002 and 2001 include $243,844 and
$237,253, respectively, of pledged fixed maturity securities
related to secured trust deposits
|
$ | 1,564,183 | $ | 1,216,240 | ||||||
Equity securities, at fair value
|
74,401 | 56,360 | ||||||||
Other long-term investments
|
38,368 | 39,682 | ||||||||
Settlement of investments
|
(207 | ) | 19,691 | |||||||
Short-term investments, at December 31, 2002
and 2001 include $231,080 and $81,893, respectively, of pledged
short-term investments related to secured trust deposits
|
888,863 | 491,539 | ||||||||
Total investments
|
2,565,608 | 1,823,512 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, at December 31,
2002 and 2001 include $295,051 and $367,907, respectively, of
pledged cash related to secured trust deposits
|
482,600 | 542,620 | ||||||||
Leases and residual interests in securitizations
|
119,242 | 173,883 | ||||||||
Trade receivables, net
|
220,842 | 163,961 | ||||||||
Notes receivable, net (related party
$2,804 in 2002 and $8,720 in 2001)
|
12,363 | 20,149 | ||||||||
Goodwill
|
996,613 | 808,584 | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
351,348 | 339,242 | ||||||||
Title plants
|
275,976 | 275,591 | ||||||||
Property and equipment, net
|
165,595 | 161,643 | ||||||||
Deferred tax asset
|
55,557 | 106,813 | ||||||||
$ | 5,245,744 | $ | 4,415,998 | |||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
$ | 698,917 | $ | 596,019 | ||||||
Notes payable
|
493,458 | 565,690 | ||||||||
Reserve for claim losses
|
887,973 | 881,053 | ||||||||
Secured trust deposits
|
750,920 | 673,126 | ||||||||
Income taxes payable
|
28,743 | 14,074 | ||||||||
2,860,011 | 2,729,962 | |||||||||
Minority interests and preferred stock of
subsidiary
|
131,797 | 47,166 | ||||||||
Stockholders equity:
|
||||||||||
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; authorized,
3,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding, none
|
| | ||||||||
Common stock, $.0001 par value; authorized,
150,000,000 shares as of December 31, 2002 and 100,000,000
shares as of December 31, 2001; issued, 97,176,975 as of
December 31, 2002 and 95,348,876 as of December 31,
2001.
|
10 | 10 | ||||||||
Additional paid-in capital
|
1,550,011 | 1,158,847 | ||||||||
Retained earnings
|
738,522 | 498,073 | ||||||||
2,288,543 | 1,656,930 | |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings
|
12,303 | 4,866 | ||||||||
Less treasury stock, 1,471,600 shares as of
December 31, 2002 and 1,100,000 shares as of
December 31, 2001, at cost
|
(46,910 | ) | (22,926 | ) | ||||||
2,253,936 | 1,638,870 | |||||||||
$ | 5,245,744 | $ | 4,415,998 | |||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
35
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||
Revenue:
|
||||||||||||||
Title insurance premiums
|
$ | 3,547,729 | $ | 2,694,479 | $ | 1,946,159 | ||||||||
Escrow and other title related fees
|
970,700 | 728,406 | 459,121 | |||||||||||
Real estate related services
|
435,347 | 287,063 | 166,718 | |||||||||||
Interest and investment income
|
78,017 | 93,105 | 87,392 | |||||||||||
Realized gains and (losses), net
|
12,019 | 6,349 | (201 | ) | ||||||||||
Other income
|
38,828 | 64,705 | 82,805 | |||||||||||
5,082,640 | 3,874,107 | 2,741,994 | ||||||||||||
Expenses:
|
||||||||||||||
Personnel costs
|
1,476,430 | 1,187,177 | 845,349 | |||||||||||
Other operating expenses
|
1,021,893 | 829,433 | 624,087 | |||||||||||
Agent commissions
|
1,521,573 | 1,098,328 | 884,498 | |||||||||||
Provision for claim losses
|
177,391 | 134,724 | 97,322 | |||||||||||
Goodwill amortization
|
| 54,155 | 35,003 | |||||||||||
Interest expense
|
34,053 | 46,569 | 59,374 | |||||||||||
4,231,340 | 3,350,386 | 2,545,633 | ||||||||||||
Earnings before income taxes, minority interest
and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
|
851,300 | 523,721 | 196,361 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense
|
306,468 | 209,488 | 86,624 | |||||||||||
Earnings before minority interest and cumulative
effect of a change in accounting principle
|
544,832 | 314,233 | 109,737 | |||||||||||
Minority interest
|
13,115 | 3,048 | 1,422 | |||||||||||
Earnings before cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle
|
531,717 | 311,185 | 108,315 | |||||||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle, net of income tax benefit of $3,035
|
| (5,709 | ) | | ||||||||||
Net earnings
|
$ | 531,717 | $ | 305,476 | $ | 108,315 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per share before cumulative effect
of a change in accounting principle
|
$ | 5.58 | $ | 3.31 | $ | 1.52 | ||||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle
|
| (.06 | ) | | ||||||||||
Basic net earnings per share
|
$ | 5.58 | $ | 3.25 | $ | 1.52 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic basis
|
95,371 | 94,048 | 71,173 | |||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share before cumulative
effect of a change in accounting principle
|
$ | 5.38 | $ | 3.21 | $ | 1.47 | ||||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle
|
| (.06 | ) | | ||||||||||
Diluted net earnings per share
|
$ | 5.38 | $ | 3.15 | $ | 1.47 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted basis
|
98,815 | 96,865 | 73,733 | |||||||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
36
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||
Net earnings
|
$ | 531,717 | $ | 305,476 | $ | 108,315 | |||||||
Other comprehensive earnings:
|
|||||||||||||
Unrealized gains on investments, net(1)
|
18,025 | 5,643 | 8,644 | ||||||||||
Reclassification adjustments for (gains) losses
included in net earnings(2)
|
5,283 | 8,305 | (296 | ) | |||||||||
Minimum pension liability adjustment(3)
|
(15,871 | ) | (11,455 | ) | | ||||||||
Other comprehensive earnings
|
7,437 | 2,493 | 8,348 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive earnings
|
$ | 539,154 | $ | 307,969 | $ | 116,663 | |||||||
(1) | Net of income tax expense of $12.0 million, $3.8 million and $5.8 million for 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. |
(2) | Net of income tax expense (benefit) of $3.5 million, $5.5 million and $(198) for 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. |
(3) | Net of income tax benefit of $(10.2) million and $(7.6) million in 2002 and 2001, respectively. |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
37
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Additional | Other | Treasury Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paid-in | Retained | Comprehensive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Earnings | Earnings (Loss) | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 1999.
|
47,461 | $ | 5 | $ | 246,958 | $ | 327,785 | $ | (5,975 | ) | 14,563 | $ | (136,279 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock
|
| | | | | 47 | (551 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options, including associated
tax benefit
|
4,342 | | 63,521 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive earnings unrealized
gain on investments and other financial instruments
|
| | | | 8,348 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of Chicago Title Corporation
|
46,901 | 5 | 521,489 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement of treasury stock
|
(14,610 | ) | (1 | ) | (136,829 | ) | | | (14,610 | ) | 136,830 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared ($0.32 per share)
|
| | | (26,884 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
| | | 108,315 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2000
|
84,094 | 9 | 695,139 | 409,216 | 2,373 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock
|
| | | | | 1,100 | (22,926 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options, including associated
tax benefit
|
1,201 | | 20,666 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive earnings unrealized
gain on investments and other financial instruments
|
| | | | 13,948 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive earnings minimum
pension liability adjustment
|
| | | | (11,455 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock offering, net
|
9,741 | 1 | 256,300 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital transactions of investments accounted for
under the equity method
|
| | (1,079 | ) | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared ($0.34 per share)
|
| | | (32,948 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions
|
313 | | 4,150 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of 10% stock dividend
|
| | 183,671 | (183,671 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
| | | 305,476 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2001.
|
95,349 | 10 | 1,158,847 | 498,073 | 4,866 | 1,100 | (22,926 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock
|
| | | | | 2,035 | (61,210 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options, including associated
tax benefit
|
3,491 | | 71,679 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive earnings
unrealized gain on investments and other financial instruments
|
| | | | 23,308 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive earnings minimum
pension liability adjustment
|
| | | | (15,871 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Capital transactions of investments accounted for
under the equity method
|
| | 8,318 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement of treasury stock
|
(1,663 | ) | | (37,226 | ) | | | (1,663 | ) | 37,226 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared ($0.43 per share)
|
| | | (41,607 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
FNIS/Micro General merger
|
| | 98,732 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of 10% stock dividend
|
| | 249,661 | (249,661 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
| | | 531,717 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2002
|
97,177 | $ | 10 | $ | 1,550,011 | $ | 738,522 | $ | 12,303 | 1,472 | $ | (46,910 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
38
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||
Cash Flows From Operating
Activities:
|
||||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
$ | 531,717 | $ | 305,476 | $ | 108,315 | ||||||||
Adjustment to reconcile net earnings to net cash
provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle
|
| 8,744 | | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
74,163 | 118,282 | 95,427 | |||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in reserve for claim
losses
|
6,920 | (26,429 | ) | (3,225 | ) | |||||||||
Provision for losses on real estate and notes
receivable
|
631 | 650 | 1,016 | |||||||||||
(Gain) loss on sales of investments and other
assets
|
(12,019 | ) | (6,349 | ) | 201 | |||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects
from acquisitions:
|
||||||||||||||
Net (increase) decrease in leases and
residual interests in securitizations
|
54,641 | (28,341 | ) | (12,801 | ) | |||||||||
Tax benefit associated with the exercise of stock
options
|
21,329 | 8,814 | 17,000 | |||||||||||
Net (increase) decrease in secured trust
deposits
|
(5,316 | ) | 1,237 | (16,577 | ) | |||||||||
Net increase in trade receivables
|
(49,993 | ) | (28,611 | ) | (10,775 | ) | ||||||||
Net increase in prepaid expenses and other assets
|
(12,879 | ) | (19,146 | ) | (36,076 | ) | ||||||||
Net increase in accounts payable, accrued
liabilities and minority interests
|
157,560 | 27,938 | 30,639 | |||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in income taxes
|
47,235 | 65,275 | (12,081 | ) | ||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
813,989 | 427,540 | 161,063 | |||||||||||
Cash Flows From Investing
Activities:
|
||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sales of investment securities
available for sale
|
1,128,301 | 892,790 | 340,029 | |||||||||||
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities
available for sale
|
165,166 | 109,594 | 64,935 | |||||||||||
Proceeds from sales of title plant and property
and equipment
|
| 1,352 | | |||||||||||
Proceeds from sales of real estate
|
9,669 | 2,220 | 6,170 | |||||||||||
Collections of notes receivable
|
11,779 | 4,753 | 11,833 | |||||||||||
Additions to title plants
|
(564 | ) | (1,232 | ) | (1,673 | ) | ||||||||
Additions to property and equipment
|
(77,245 | ) | (42,008 | ) | (47,953 | ) | ||||||||
Additions to notes receivable
|
(5,668 | ) | (9,771 | ) | (10,135 | ) | ||||||||
Purchases of investment securities available for
sale
|
(1,467,938 | ) | (1,172,701 | ) | (282,164 | ) | ||||||||
Net purchases from short-term investment
activities
|
(392,336 | ) | (82,437 | ) | (196,414 | ) | ||||||||
Sale of subsidiary, net of cash sold
|
15,500 | | | |||||||||||
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired
|
(59,516 | ) | (74,355 | ) | (537,980 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(672,852 | ) | (371,795 | ) | (653,352 | ) | ||||||||
Cash Flows From Financing
Activities:
|
||||||||||||||
Borrowings
|
26,037 | 119,475 | 767,040 | |||||||||||
Net proceeds from common stock offering
|
| 256,301 | | |||||||||||
Net proceeds from issuance of notes
|
| 250,000 | | |||||||||||
Debt service payments
|
(104,993 | ) | (595,215 | ) | (205,861 | ) | ||||||||
Dividends paid
|
(38,485 | ) | (31,333 | ) | (22,615 | ) | ||||||||
Exercise of stock options
|
50,350 | 11,852 | 46,521 | |||||||||||
Purchases of treasury stock
|
(61,210 | ) | (22,926 | ) | (551 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities
|
(128,301 | ) | (11,846 | ) | 584,534 | |||||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents,
excluding pledged cash related to secured trust deposits
|
12,836 | 43,899 | 92,245 | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, excluding pledged cash
related to secured trust deposits, at beginning of year
|
174,713 | 130,814 | 38,569 | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, excluding pledged cash
related to secured trust deposits, at end of year
|
$ | 187,549 | $ | 174,713 | $ | 130,814 | ||||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
39
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
A. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The following describes the significant accounting policies of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) which have been followed in preparing the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
Description of Business |
Fidelity National Financial, Inc., through its principal subsidiaries (collectively, the Company), is the largest title insurance and diversified real estate related services company in the United States. The Companys title insurance underwriters Fidelity National Title, Chicago Title, Ticor Title, Security Union Title and Alamo Title together issue all of the Companys title insurance policies in 49 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and in Canada and Mexico.
In addition, the Company provides a broad array of escrow and other title related services, as well as real estate related services, including: collection and trust activities, trustees sales guarantees, recordings, reconveyances, property appraisal, credit reporting, exchange intermediary services, real estate tax services, home warranty insurance, foreclosure posting and publishing, loan portfolio services, flood certification, field services, property data and disclosure services, multiple listing services, mortgage loan fulfillment services, flood insurance and home owners insurance.
The Companys principal title subsidiaries consist of Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company of New York, Chicago Title Insurance Company, Chicago Title Insurance Company of Oregon, Ticor Title Insurance Company, Security Union Title Insurance Company and Alamo Title Insurance. The Companys principal underwritten title company subsidiaries consist of Fidelity National Title Company, Fidelity National Title Company of California and Chicago Title Company.
The Company includes the accounts of its majority-owned real estate related services public subsidiary, Fidelity National Information Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ: FNIS, FNIS), formerly VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. (Vista), and its majority-owned information services subsidiary, Micro General Corporation (Micro General), which was merged with FNIS on July 9, 2002 (see Note B), in its consolidated results. As of December 31, 2002, the Company owns approximately 66.1% of the outstanding common stock of FNIS.
The Company also originates, funds, purchases, sells, securitizes and services equipment leases for a broad range of businesses through its wholly-owned subsidiary, FNF Capital, Inc. (FNF Capital). In the fourth quarter of 2001, the Company discontinued its small-ticket lease origination business.
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany profits, transactions and balances have been eliminated. The Companys investments in non-majority-owned partnerships and affiliates are accounted for on the equity method. The Companys financial results for the year ended December 31, 2001 include the results of the former operations of Vista for the period from August 1, 2001, the acquisition date, through December 31, 2001. The Companys financial results for the year ended December 31, 2000 include the operations of Chicago Title Corporation (Chicago Title) for the period from March 20, 2000, the merger date, through December 31, 2000. See Note B.
All dollars presented in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements are in thousands, except per share amounts and unless indicated otherwise.
40
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
For purposes of reporting cash flows, highly liquid instruments purchased with original maturities of three months or less are considered cash equivalents. The carrying amounts reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for these instruments approximate their fair value.
Investments |
Fixed maturity securities are purchased to support the investment strategies of the Company, which are developed based on many factors including rate of return, maturity, credit risk, tax considerations and regulatory requirements. Fixed maturity securities which may be sold prior to maturity to support the Companys investment strategies are carried at fair value and are classified as available for sale as of the balance sheet dates. Fair values for fixed maturity securities are principally a function of current interest rates and are based on quoted market prices. Included in fixed maturities are mortgage-backed securities, which are recorded at purchase cost. Discount or premium is recorded for the difference between the purchase price and the principal amount. The discount or premium is amortized using the interest method and is recorded as an adjustment to interest and investment income. The interest method results in the recognition of a constant rate of return on the investment equal to the prevailing rate at the time of purchase or at the time of subsequent adjustments of book value. Changes in prepayment assumptions are accounted for prospectively.
Equity securities are considered to be available for sale and carried at fair value as of the balance sheet dates. Fair values are based on quoted market prices.
Other long-term investments, which consist of a limited partnership interest in an investment fund, as well as certain other debt instruments and equity investments, are carried at cost, market, or on the equity method, as appropriate.
Short-term investments, which consist primarily of securities purchased under agreements to resell, commercial paper and money market instruments, which have an original maturity of one year or less, are carried at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.
Realized gains and losses on the sale of investments are determined on the basis of the cost of the specific investments sold and are credited or charged to income on a trade date basis. Unrealized gains or losses on fixed maturity and equity securities which are classified as available for sale, net of applicable deferred income taxes (benefits), are excluded from earnings and credited or charged directly to a separate component of stockholders equity. If any unrealized losses on fixed maturity or equity securities are deemed other-than-temporary, such unrealized losses are recognized as realized losses.
Leases and Residual Interests in Securitizations |
Leases and residual interests in securitizations includes direct financing leases, direct financing leases assigned to lender and residual interests in lease securitizations.
Direct Financing Leases |
The Companys leases are accounted for as direct financing leases. Under this method, the amount by which gross lease rentals exceed the cost of the related assets, less the estimated recoverable residual value at the expiration of the lease, is recognized as income from direct financing leases over the life of the lease using the interest method. Interest is accrued only if deemed collectible.
Direct financing leases which the Company has both the intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held to maturity. Direct financing leases originated principally for the purpose of selling in the
41
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
near term are classified as available for sale and are stated at the lower of amortized cost or market as determined by outstanding commitments from investors or current investor-yield requirements calculated on an aggregate basis.
Allowance for Credit Losses on Leases |
The Company establishes an allowance for credit losses to provide for expected losses in the Companys existing portfolio of leases and leases transferred on a recourse basis. The allowance for credit losses is based on the Companys historical and expected loss experience, industry knowledge and other economic factors. The ultimate obligation for defaults and delinquencies related to leases transferred on a recourse basis is measured and recorded at the time of transfer.
Leases are collateralized by equipment. In addition, lessees generally are required to personally guarantee lease payments. The Companys risk of loss is partially mitigated by recovering collateral and enforcing guarantees. However, the resale value of leased equipment generally declines at a rate greater than the principal of the lease. As a result, full recovery on defaulted leases is not usually possible.
Lease Securitization and Residual Interests in Securitizations |
A transfer of financial assets in which control is surrendered is accounted for as a sale to the extent that consideration other than beneficial interests in the transferred assets is received in the exchange. Liabilities and derivatives incurred or obtained by the transfer of financial assets are required to be measured at fair value, if practicable. Also, servicing assets and other retained interests in the transferred assets are measured by allocating the previous carrying value between the assets sold and the interest retained, if any, based on their relative fair values at the date of transfer.
The Companys securitizations are generally structured as follows: first, the Company sells a portfolio of lease receivables to a special purpose entity (SPE) which has been established for the limited purpose of buying and reselling the Companys lease receivables; next, the SPE transfers the same receivables to a Trust (the Trust), and the Trust in turn issues interest-bearing asset-backed securities generally in an amount equal to the aggregate initial principal balance of the lease receivables, multiplied by an advance rate. At the close of each securitization that is accounted for as a sale, the Company removes from its consolidated balance sheet the lease receivables held for sale and adds to its consolidated balance sheet (i) the cash received and (ii) the allocated cost of residual interests in securitizations, which consists of (a) cash collateral account and (b) net excess cash flows. At December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Companys remaining securitization facilities had an aggregate outstanding balance of $95.8 million and $218.7 million, respectively. Of those amounts, the remaining balance related to securitizations accounted for as sales were $16.4 million and $79.6 million at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
During 2002 and 2001, all securitization transactions were structured such that sale accounting was not achieved. The related leases and debt continue to be recognized on the Companys balance sheet.
Residual interests in securitizations (Residuals) of lease receivables in a trust are recorded as a result of the sale of lease receivables through securitization. These Residuals are recorded at estimated fair value and accounted for as available for sale securities. Prior to April 1, 2001, changes in the fair value of the Residuals were recorded as unrealized gains or losses, net of applicable deferred income taxes (benefits), and were excluded from earnings and credited or charged directly to a separate component of stockholders equity. Included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings at December 31, 2000 were net unrealized losses of $3.2 million related to Residuals.
42
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
During the second quarter of 2001, the Company adopted Emerging Issues Task Force No. 99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets, (EITF 99-20). EITF 99-20 sets forth the rules for recognizing interest income on all credit-sensitive mortgage and asset-backed securities and certain prepayment-sensitive securities including agency interest-only strips, whether purchased or retained in securitization and determining when these securities must be written down to fair value because of impairment. Adoption of EITF 99-20 requires the valuation of residual interests in securitizations to be recorded as a reduction to the carrying value of the residual interests through a charge to earnings when any portion of the decline in fair value is attributable to an impairment loss, rather than an unrealized loss in stockholders equity. As such, the Company recorded a charge of $5.7 million, net of income tax benefit of $3.0 million, in the second quarter of 2001.
The Company is not aware of an active market for the purchase or sale of Residuals at this time. Accordingly, the Company estimates the fair value of the Residuals by calculating the present value of the estimated expected future excess cash flows received by the Company after being released by the Trust (cash out method) using a discount rate of approximately 12%, which management believes is commensurate with the risks involved. The Company estimates the future rates of prepayments, delinquencies, defaults and default loss severity as they impact the amount and timing of the estimated cash flows. The Company uses a zero prepayment estimate because the lease contracts generally require the lessee to pay all or a majority of the lease payments due under the remaining lease term. The Companys loss is based on historical loss data for comparable leases and the specific characteristics of the leases originated by the Company. The Companys default estimates resulted in a weighted average life of the pool of leases of between approximately 1.5 and 2.0 years.
Sales of Leases |
Gains or losses resulting from the sales of leases are recognized in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings at the date of sale and are based upon the excess of the proceeds over the allocated cost of the leases sold. Nonrefundable fees and direct costs associated with the origination of leases are deferred and recognized over the life of the lease and any remaining unamortized balance is recognized when the leases are sold.
Lease Acquisition Costs and Broker Commissions |
Lease acquisition costs consist of broker bonuses and commissions paid upon the origination of equipment lease contracts. The costs are included in direct finance leases and are amortized to expense over the life of the related lease using the interest method.
Trade Receivables |
The carrying values reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for trade receivables approximate their fair value.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
The fair values of financial instruments presented in the applicable notes to the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements are estimates of the fair values at a specific point in time using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and significant judgment in the interpretation of current market data. Therefore, the fair values
43
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
presented are not necessarily indicative of amounts the Company could realize or settle currently. The Company does not necessarily intend to dispose of or liquidate such instruments prior to maturity.
Title Plants |
Title plants are recorded at the cost incurred to construct or obtain and organize historical title information to the point it can be used to perform title searches. Costs incurred to maintain, update and operate title plants are expensed as incurred. Title plants are not amortized as they are considered to have an indefinite life if maintained. Sales of title plants are reported at the amount received net of the adjusted costs of the title plant sold. Sales of title plant copies are reported at the amount received. No cost is allocated to the sale of copies of title plants unless the carrying value of the title plant is diminished or impaired.
Property and Equipment |
Property and equipment are recorded at cost, less depreciation. Depreciation is computed primarily using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the related assets which range from three to thirty years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the term of the applicable lease or the estimated useful lives of such assets.
Adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142) |
SFAS No. 142 requires that an intangible asset that is acquired shall be initially recognized and measured based on its fair value. The statement also provides that goodwill should not be amortized, but shall be tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate potential impairment, through a comparison of fair value to its carrying amount.
As required by SFAS No. 142, the Company has completed an annual goodwill impairment test on its reporting units and has determined that each of its reporting units has a fair value in excess of its carrying value. Accordingly, no goodwill impairment has been recorded.
Beginning on January 1, 2002, the Company ceased recording goodwill amortization in accordance with SFAS No. 142. The following table reconciles reported net earnings and net earnings per share to adjusted net earnings and net earnings per share:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | |||||||||||||
Reported net earnings
|
$ | 531,717 | $ | 305,476 | $ | 108,315 | |||||||
Add back: Goodwill amortization
|
| 54,155 | 35,003 | ||||||||||
Add back: Tax effect of goodwill amortization
|
| (1,062 | ) | (838 | ) | ||||||||
Adjusted net earnings
|
$ | 531,717 | $ | 358,569 | $ | 142,480 | |||||||
Basic Earnings Per Share:
|
|||||||||||||
Reported net earnings
|
$ | 5.58 | $ | 3.25 | $ | 1.52 | |||||||
Goodwill amortization
|
| 0.57 | .49 | ||||||||||
Tax effect of goodwill amortization
|
| (.01 | ) | (.01 | ) | ||||||||
Adjusted net earnings per share basic
|
$ | 5.58 | $ | 3.81 | $ | 2.00 | |||||||
44
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | |||||||||||||
Diluted Earnings Per Share:
|
|||||||||||||
Reported net earnings
|
$ | 5.38 | $ | 3.15 | $ | 1.47 | |||||||
Goodwill amortization
|
| 0.56 | .47 | ||||||||||
Tax effect of goodwill amortization
|
| (.01 | ) | (.01 | ) | ||||||||
Adjusted net earnings per share
diluted
|
$ | 5.38 | $ | 3.70 | $ | 1.93 | |||||||
Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
At December 31, 2002 and 2001, goodwill was $1,089.5 million and $901.4 million, respectively, less accumulated amortization of $92.9 million in both 2002 and 2001. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, the Company ceased recording goodwill amortization beginning on January 1, 2002.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No, 142, goodwill was amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected periods to be benefited, generally 7 to 20 years, and assessed for recoverability by an analysis of the undiscounted future cash flows generated by the underlying assets. In 2001, the Company recorded pre-tax asset impairment losses totaling $16.6 million, of which $13.5 million related to the Companys decision to discontinue FNF Capitals small-ticket lease origination business and $3.1 million related to Micro Generals decision to discontinue its wholesale international long distance business. These amounts are included as part of the $10.0 million after tax charges the Company recorded in the fourth quarter of 2001. In 2000, the Company recorded pre-tax impairment losses totaling $7.0 million, primarily relating to the write-off of goodwill and capitalized software costs of non-title related businesses. These amounts are included as part of the $13.4 million after tax charges the Company recorded in the first quarter of 2000.
Intangible assets are included in prepaid expenses and other assets and include capitalized software costs and other intangible assets, which consist mainly of capitalized debt offering costs, contracts, customer relationships, patents and trademarks, and are amortized on a straight-line basis over 3 to 20 years. At December 31, 2002, capitalized software costs were $136.1 million, less accumulated amortization of $27.5 million and other intangible assets were $ 71.8 million, less accumulated amortization of $14.8 million. At December 31, 2001, capitalized software costs were $97.0 million, less accumulated amortization of $20.3 million and other intangible assets were $20.7 million, less accumulated amortization of $8.2 million.
Income Taxes |
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Companys assets and liabilities and expected benefits of utilizing net operating loss and credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The impact on deferred taxes of changes in tax rates and laws, if any, are applied to the years during which temporary differences are expected to be settled and reflected in the financial statements in the period enacted.
Reserve for Claim Losses |
The Companys reserve for claim losses includes known claims as well as losses the Company expects to incur, net of recoupments. Each known claim is reserved based on a review by the Company as to the estimated amount of the claim and the costs required to settle the claim. Reserves for claims which are
45
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
incurred but not reported are established at the time premium revenue is recognized based on historical loss experience and other factors, including industry averages, claim loss history, current legal environment, geographic considerations and type of policy written.
The reserve for claim losses also includes reserves for losses arising from the escrow, closing and disbursement functions due to fraud or operational error.
If a loss is related to a policy issued by an independent agent, the Company may proceed against the independent agent pursuant to the terms of the agency agreement. In any event, the Company may proceed against third parties who are responsible for any loss under the title insurance policy under rights of subrogation. See Note I.
Reinsurance |
In the ordinary course of business, the Company limits its maximum loss exposure by reinsuring certain risks with other insurers. The Company also earns additional income by assuming reinsurance for certain risks of other insurers. The Company also cedes a portion of certain policy and other liabilities under agent fidelity, excess of loss and case-by-case reinsurance agreements. Reinsurance agreements provide that in the event of a loss (including costs, attorneys fees and expenses) exceeding the retained amounts, the reinsurer is liable for the excess amount assumed. However, the ceding company remains primarily liable in the event the reinsurer does not meet its contractual obligations.
Title Premiums, Escrow and Other Title Related Fees, Real Estate Related Services and Other Income |
Direct title insurance premiums and escrow and other title related fees are recognized as revenue at the time of closing of the related transaction as the earnings process is considered complete. Agency title insurance premiums are recognized as revenue when policies are reported to the Company and are recorded as revenue on a gross basis (before the deduction of agent commissions). The Company accrues for unreported agency title insurance premiums based on historical reporting patterns of its agents and current trends. Real estate related services and other income are recognized over the period the related services are provided.
Other income represents revenue generated from the operations of Micro General, which was merged with FNIS on July 9, 2002, and FNF Capital.
Share and Per Share Restatement |
On April 24, 2002, the Company declared a 10% stock dividend to stockholders of record on May 9, 2002, payable on May 23, 2002. On July 24, 2001, the Company declared a 10% stock dividend to stockholders of record on August 9, 2001, payable on August 23, 2001. The fair value of the additional shares of common stock issued in connection with the stock dividends was credited to additional paid-in capital and a like amount charged to retained earnings during 2002 and 2001. Fractional shares were paid in cash.
All data with respect to earnings per share, dividends per share and share information, including price per share where applicable, in the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock dividends.
Earnings Per Share |
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net earnings available to common stockholders plus the impact of assumed conversions
46
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
of dilutive potential securities. The Company has granted certain options and warrants which have been treated as common share equivalents for purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share.
The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||
Basic and diluted earnings before cumulative
effect of a change in accounting principle
|
$ | 531,717 | $ | 311,185 | $ | 108,315 | ||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding during the
year, basic basis
|
95,371 | 94,048 | 71,173 | |||||||||
Plus: Common stock equivalent shares assumed from
conversion of options
|
3,444 | 2,817 | 2,560 | |||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding during the
year, diluted basis
|
98,815 | 96,865 | 73,733 | |||||||||
Basic earnings per share before cumulative effect
of a change in accounting principle
|
$ | 5.58 | $ | 3.31 | $ | 1.52 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share before cumulative
effect of a change in accounting principle
|
$ | 5.38 | $ | 3.21 | $ | 1.47 | ||||||
Options to purchase 68,120 shares, 207,720 shares and 1,408,170 shares of the Companys common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation Plans
At December 31, 2002, the Company has seven stock-based employee compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note L. The Company accounts for those plans under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. All options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant; therefore no stock-based compensation cost is reflected in net income. However, certain of the Companys stock-based compensation plans allow for exercise prices with a fixed discount from the quoted market price, and as such, employee compensation cost is reflected in net income as it pertains to the exercise price decrease. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and
47
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based employee compensation (see Note L):
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Net earnings, as reported
|
$ | 531,717 | $ | 305,476 | $ | 108,315 | |||||||
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in
reported net earnings, net of related tax effects
|
531 | 404 | 264 | ||||||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value based methods for all
awards, net of related tax effects
|
(10,990 | ) | (14,607 | ) | (9,024 | ) | |||||||
Pro forma net earnings
|
$ | 521,258 | $ | 291,273 | $ | 99,555 | |||||||
Earnings per share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic as reported
|
$ | 5.58 | $ | 3.25 | $ | 1.52 | |||||||
Basic pro forma
|
$ | 5.47 | $ | 3.10 | $ | 1.40 | |||||||
Diluted as reported
|
$ | 5.38 | $ | 3.15 | $ | 1.47 | |||||||
Diluted pro forma
|
$ | 5.26 | $ | 3.00 | $ | 1.34 |
Management Estimates
The preparation of these Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Certain Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made in the 2001 and 2000 Consolidated Financial Statements to conform to the classifications used in 2002.
B. Acquisitions
On March 20, 2000, Chicago Title Corporation (Chicago Title) merged with and into the Company pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated August 1, 1999, as amended on October 13, 1999. Pursuant to the merger agreement, Chicago Title stockholders received aggregate merger consideration valued at approximately $1.1 billion. The merger consideration was paid in the form of 1.9440 shares of Company common stock and $26.00 in cash for each share of Chicago Title common stock, resulting in the issuance of approximately 46.9 million shares of Company common stock valued at an average price during the applicable trading period of $11.9792 per share and the payment of approximately $570.2 million in cash. The merger was accounted for as a purchase.
In connection with the merger, the Company entered into a syndicated credit agreement. See Note G. Amounts borrowed under the credit agreement were used to finance the cash portion of the merger consideration, to refinance previously existing indebtedness, to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the merger and to fund other general corporate purposes.
48
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The assets acquired, including goodwill, (see Note A), and liabilities assumed in the Chicago Title merger were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Tangible assets acquired at fair value
|
$ | 1,774,016 | |||
Goodwill
|
762,304 | ||||
Liabilities assumed at fair value
|
(1,429,860 | ) | |||
Total purchase price
|
$ | 1,106,460 | |||
Selected unaudited pro forma combined results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2000, assuming the merger had occurred as of January 1, 2000, and using actual general and administrative expenses prior to the merger, are set forth below:
December 31, 2000 | ||||
(In thousands, except | ||||
per data share) | ||||
Total revenue
|
$ | 3,074,254 | ||
Net earnings before merger-related expenses and
non-recurring charges
|
$ | 119,004 | ||
Net earnings
|
$ | 85,216 | ||
Basic net earnings per share before
merger-related expenses and non-recurring charges
|
$ | 1.46 | ||
Diluted net earnings per share before
merger-related expenses and non-recurring charges
|
$ | 1.42 | ||
Basic net earnings per share
|
$ | 1.05 | ||
Diluted net earnings per share
|
$ | 1.02 |
On January 3, 2001, the Company acquired International Data Management Corporation (IDM), a leading provider of real estate information services, for $20.8 million in cash. IDMs real estate information databases contain over 100 million real property ownership and sales records from the continental United States. The databases are updated daily to reflect new sales, mortgage information and other changes in real property ownership. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase.
On June 19, 2001 the Company acquired Risco, Inc. (Risco), the third largest multiple listing service vendor in the United States, for approximately $12.0 million in cash. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase.
On August 1, 2001, the Company acquired approximately 80% of the outstanding common stock of FNIS, formerly VISTA, a provider of real estate information products and services, including multiple listing services and environmental data and disclosure information businesses. In consideration for this acquisition, the Company contributed its wholly-owned tax, credit, flood, appraisal, property records (IDM) and multiple listing service (Risco) businesses to the former Vista entity and as a result, immediately following the consummation of the transaction, the Company owned approximately 80% of the combined entity. For the period from August 1, 2001, the acquisition date, through December 31, 2002, the results of the former operations of Vista are included in the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
On April 30, 2002, FNIS announced a tender offer for all of the outstanding shares of Micro General, whereby each share of Micro General common stock would be exchanged for shares of FNIS common stock. On July 9, 2002, the tender offer and subsequent short form merger was completed and Micro General became a wholly-owned subsidiary of FNIS. Under the terms of the tender offer and merger, each share of Micro General common stock was exchanged for .696 shares of FNIS common stock. FNIS issued approximately 12.9 million shares of common stock to Micro General stockholders, resulting in approximately 38.3 million outstanding shares of FNIS common stock. As of December 31, 2002, the Company owns
49
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
approximately 66.1% of the outstanding common stock of FNIS. In the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements, this transaction is accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141) and FASB Technical Bulletin 85-5. Accordingly, FNISs acquisition of the minority stockholders interest in Micro General (the noncontrolled equity interest) was recognized by the Company as the acquisition of shares from a minority interest, which is accounted for by the purchase method under SFAS No. 141. FNISs acquisition of the Companys interest in Micro General (the controlled equity interest) is not considered a business combination and, therefore, the Company recognized the related assets and liabilities transferred from the controlled equity interest in Micro General to FNIS at their historical carrying values. The market price per share of FNIS common stock that was issued to Micro General minority stockholders in this transaction exceeded the Companys carrying amount per share of FNIS common stock, resulting in an increase of $98.7 million to the Companys consolidated equity and an increase in net assets, the majority of which was goodwill. The Company has recorded certain preliminary purchase accounting adjustments, which are based on estimates utilizing available information. Such purchase accounting adjustments may be refined as additional information becomes available.
On May 23, 2002, the Company acquired a 75% interest in Homebuilders Financial Network, Inc. (HFN), a provider of outsource mortgage loan fulfillment services to homebuilders, for approximately $21.0 million in cash.
In July 2002, the Company purchased 883,178 shares of the common stock of ANFI, Inc. (ANFI), a publicly traded California corporation, formerly known as American National Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ:ANFI), of which 98,200 shares were purchased in the open market at an average price of $11.51, and the remaining shares were purchased from certain executive officers of ANFI for a negotiated price of $12.00 per share. As a result of these purchases, the Company increased its ownership percentage of ANFI to approximately 28.0%. As of December 31, 2002 the Company accounted for its investment in ANFI under the equity method of accounting.
On January 9, 2003, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with ANFI, Inc. The merger agreement was subsequently amended on February 21, 2003. Pursuant to the merger agreement, ANFI will merge with and into the Companys wholly-owned merger subsidiary. In the merger, each share of ANFI common stock (other than ANFI common stock the Company already owns) will be exchanged for 0.454 of a share of the Companys common stock. The consummation of the transaction is subject to the approval of ANFI stockholders. The ANFI stockholder meeting is currently scheduled to be held on March 26, 2003 and the Company currently anticipates closing the merger on March 27, 2003. The Company anticipates that it will issue approximately 3.2 million shares of its common stock to the ANFI stockholders in the merger.
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, goodwill recorded in transactions occurring after June 30, 2001, will not be amortized. See Note A.
50
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
C. Investments
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Companys fixed maturity securities at December 31, 2002 and 2001 are as follows:
December 31, 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | ||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||
Value | Cost | Gains | Losses | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed maturity investments (available for sale):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agencies
|
$ | 643,767 | $ | 625,710 | $ | 18,059 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 643,767 | ||||||||||
States and political subdivisions
|
609,279 | 584,436 | 24,929 | (86 | ) | 609,279 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate securities
|
215,702 | 208,919 | 8,759 | (1,976 | ) | 215,702 | |||||||||||||||
Foreign government bonds
|
2,665 | 2,629 | 36 | | 2,665 | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
92,770 | 90,263 | 2,507 | | 92,770 | ||||||||||||||||
$ | 1,564,183 | $ | 1,511,957 | $ | 54,290 | $ | (2,064 | ) | $ | 1,564,183 | |||||||||||
December 31, 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | ||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||
Value | Cost | Gains | Losses | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed maturity investments (available for sale):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agencies
|
$ | 461,217 | $ | 453,077 | $ | 9,536 | $ | (1,396 | ) | $ | 461,217 | ||||||||||
States and political subdivisions
|
518,738 | 504,981 | 14,191 | (434 | ) | 518,738 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate securities
|
233,612 | 230,427 | 6,699 | (3,514 | ) | 233,612 | |||||||||||||||
Foreign government bonds
|
2,222 | 2,134 | 88 | | 2,222 | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
451 | 660 | 19 | (228 | ) | 451 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 1,216,240 | $ | 1,191,279 | $ | 30,533 | $ | (5,572 | ) | $ | 1,216,240 | |||||||||||
The change in unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturities for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 was $27.3 million, $2.6 million and $29.1 million, respectively.
Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
51
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents certain information regarding the Companys fixed maturity securities at December 31, 2002:
December 31, 2002 ? | ||||||||||||||||
Amortized | % of | Fair | % of | |||||||||||||
Maturity | Cost | Total | Value | Total | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
One year or less
|
$ | 195,739 | 12.9 | % | $ | 195,807 | 12.5 | % | ||||||||
After one year through five years
|
832,792 | 55.0 | 865,405 | 55.4 | ||||||||||||
After five years through ten years
|
253,257 | 16.8 | 267,737 | 17.1 | ||||||||||||
After ten years
|
139,906 | 9.3 | 142,464 | 9.1 | ||||||||||||
1,421,694 | 1,471,413 | |||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
90,263 | 6.0 | 92,770 | 5.9 | ||||||||||||
$ | 1,511,957 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,564,183 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
Subject to call
|
$ | 65,787 | 4.4 | % | $ | 68,408 | 4.4 | % | ||||||||
Fixed maturity securities valued at approximately $61.3 million and $38.1 million were on deposit with various governmental authorities at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, as required by law.
Equity securities at December 31, 2002 and 2001 consist of investments in various industry groups as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||
Fair | Fair | |||||||||||||||
Cost | Value | Cost | Value | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Banks, trust and insurance companies
|
$ | 6,991 | $ | 8,634 | $ | 6,247 | $ | 5,951 | ||||||||
Industrial, miscellaneous and all other
|
55,199 | 65,767 | 46,864 | 50,409 | ||||||||||||
$ | 62,190 | $ | 74,401 | $ | 53,111 | $ | 56,360 | |||||||||
The carrying value of the Companys investment in equity securities is fair value. As of December 31, 2002, gross unrealized gains and gross unrealized losses on equity securities were $15.4 million and $3.2 million, respectively. Gross unrealized gains and gross unrealized losses on equity securities were $5.7 million and $2.5 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2001.
The change in unrealized gains (losses) on equity securities for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 was $9.0 million, $16.2 million and ($12.2) million, respectively.
Interest and investment income consists of the following:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 1,691 | $ | 3,038 | $ | 4,194 | ||||||
Fixed maturity securities
|
60,457 | 61,735 | 58,452 | |||||||||
Equity securities
|
1,662 | 5,158 | 4,721 | |||||||||
Short-term investments
|
11,637 | 19,591 | 15,203 | |||||||||
Notes receivable
|
2,570 | 3,583 | 4,822 | |||||||||
$ | 78,017 | $ | 93,105 | $ | 87,392 | |||||||
52
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Net realized gains (losses) amounted to $12.0 million, $6.3 million and ($201) for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Included in 2002 net realized gains are other-than-temporary impairment losses of $11.3 million recorded on CKE during the fourth quarter of 2002 and $3.3 million recorded on MCI WorldCom bonds in the second quarter of 2002. Included in 2001 net realized gains is an other-than-temporary impairment loss of $4.4 million recorded on Enron Corporation bonds. There were no individually significant net realized gains or losses in 2000. All amounts are before applicable income taxes.
During the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, gross realized gains on sales of fixed maturity securities considered available for sale were $26.1 million, $16.5 million and $1.7 million, respectively; and gross realized losses were $7.7 million, $7.3 million and $586, respectively. Gross proceeds from the sale of fixed maturity securities considered available for sale amounted to $776.9 million, $516.5 million and $289.6 million during the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, gross realized gains on sales of equity securities considered available for sale were $26.6 million, $18.4 million and $8.9 million, respectively; and gross realized losses were $53.9 million, $36.1 million and $9.4 million, respectively. Gross proceeds from the sale of equity securities amounted to $351.4 million, $376.3 million and $50.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
D. Leases and Residual Interests in Securitizations
Direct Financing Leases
Direct financing leases at December 31, 2002 and 2001 consist of the following:
December 31, 2002 | ||||||||
Direct Financing | ||||||||
Direct Financing | Leases Assigned | |||||||
Leases | to Lender | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Minimum lease payments receivable
|
$ | 44,113 | $ | 99,043 | ||||
Estimated residual values of leased property
|
4,829 | 5,284 | ||||||
Lease acquisition costs and broker commissions
|
1,311 | 3,384 | ||||||
Unearned income
|
(6,809 | ) | (17,361 | ) | ||||
Allowance for credit losses
|
(5,423 | ) | (5,843 | ) | ||||
Security deposits
|
(1,770 | ) | (3,576 | ) | ||||
$ | 36,251 | $ | 80,931 | |||||
December 31, 2001 | ||||||||
Direct Financing | ||||||||
Direct Financing | Leases Assigned | |||||||
Leases | to Lender | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Minimum lease payments receivable
|
$ | 47,284 | $ | 156,507 | ||||
Estimated residual values of leased property
|
2,417 | 6,164 | ||||||
Lease acquisition costs and broker commissions
|
1,894 | 7,050 | ||||||
Unearned income
|
(10,170 | ) | (35,065 | ) | ||||
Allowance for credit losses
|
(4,902 | ) | (5,758 | ) | ||||
Security deposits
|
(2,360 | ) | (4,240 | ) | ||||
$ | 34,163 | $ | 124,658 | |||||
53
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Scheduled collections of minimum lease payments receivable are as follows:
Direct Financing | ||||||||
Direct Financing | Leases Assigned | |||||||
Leases | to Lender | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
2003
|
$ | 22,926 | $ | 40,928 | ||||
2004
|
10,242 | 32,760 | ||||||
2005
|
6,396 | 20,603 | ||||||
2006
|
4,035 | 3,744 | ||||||
2007
|
283 | 971 | ||||||
Thereafter
|
231 | 37 | ||||||
$ | 44,113 | $ | 99,043 | |||||
At December 31, 2002, the weighted average implicit rate of interest is approximately 10.06%.
The carrying value of the direct financing leases at December 31, 2002 and 2001 approximates fair value because of the short-term period that these leases are held before sale or securitization or, in certain cases, because the interest rate approximates current market rates. The fair value of the direct financing leases assigned to lender at December 31, 2002 and 2001 approximated the carrying value because the interest rate on the related lease-backed notes approximates current market rates.
Lease Securitization and Residual Interests in Securitizations
The Company had two remaining securitization facilities with an aggregate outstanding balance of $95.8 million as of December 31, 2002. As of December 31, 2001, the Company had four remaining securitization facilities with an outstanding balance of $218.7 million. FNF Funding X is accounted for as a collateralized borrowing. GF Funding IV and GF Funding V were closed during 2002.
The following table presents certain information related to the Companys securitization facilities at December 31, 2002 and 2001:
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Available | Outstanding | Residual | Available | Outstanding | Residual | |||||||||||||||||||
Credit | Balance | Interest | Credit | Balance | Interest | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
GF Funding IV
|
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 31,724 | $ | 7,509 | ||||||||||||
GF Funding V
|
| | | | 10,833 | 2,955 | ||||||||||||||||||
GF Funding VIII
|
| 16,366 | 2,060 | | 37,091 | 4,598 | ||||||||||||||||||
FNF Funding X
|
| 79,448 | | | 139,062 | | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | | $ | 95,814 | $ | 2,060 | $ | | $ | 218,710 | $ | 15,062 | |||||||||||||
54
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
E. Notes Receivable
Notes receivable consist of the following:
December 31, | ||||||||
2002 | 2001 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Mortgage notes, secured by various deeds of
trust, installments due monthly including interest at rates
ranging from 6.25% to 10.0%, due through 2022
|
$ | 861 | $ | 519 | ||||
Promissory notes, secured by various assets and
unsecured, installments due monthly including interest at rates
ranging from 4.5% to 12.0%, due through 2008
|
11,408 | 17,507 | ||||||
Officer and employee secured and unsecured notes
receivable at rates ranging from 5.0% to 10.0%, due through 2007
|
2,654 | 2,669 | ||||||
Employee and Director Plan, unsecured notes
receivable at 5.0% due 2005
|
150 | 6,051 | ||||||
15,073 | 26,746 | |||||||
Allowance for doubtful receivables
|
(2,710 | ) | (6,597 | ) | ||||
$ | 12,363 | $ | 20,149 | |||||
The allowance for doubtful receivables is primarily related to certain promissory notes at December 31, 2002 and 2001. Interest income is not recognized on the Companys non-performing notes receivable. There were no non-performing notes receivable at December 31, 2002 or 2001.
On March 17, 1999, the Companys Board of Directors approved the adoption of the Fidelity National Financial, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Loan Plan (Employee Plan) and the Non-Employee Director Stock Purchase Loan Program (Director Plan). The purpose of the Employee Plan and Director Plan was to provide key employees and directors with further incentive to maximize stockholder value. Employee Plan and Director Plan funds were used to make private or open market purchases of Company common stock through a broker-dealer designated by the Company. All loans are full recourse and unsecured, and have a five-year term. Interest accrues on the loans at a rate of 5.0% per annum, due at maturity. These loans may be prepaid any time without penalty. The Company originally loaned an aggregate of $7.3 million to purchase 575,397 shares of Company common stock at an average purchase price of $12.39 per share under the Employee and Direct Plans. As of December 31, 2001, the balance of these loans was $6.1 million. During 2002, $5.9 million in principal of these loans were repaid, of which the Company accepted 165,950 shares of its common stock as full payment for certain of these loans, including accrued interest, in connection with its stock repurchase program (see Note K). The price per share was determined based on the closing price on the date the loans were repaid and averaged $30.19 per share. The shares received were retired in December 2002. Subsequent to December 31, 2002, the remaining $150 of Employee and Director Plan loans was paid in full.
The carrying value of the Companys notes receivable approximated their estimated fair values at December 31, 2002 and 2001. The fair values of significant notes receivable are established using discounted cash flow analyses based on current market interest rates and comparison of rates being received to interest rates currently being offered for similar loans to borrowers with similar credit ratings. Loans with similar characteristics are aggregated for purposes of the calculations. All other notes receivable are not significant individually or in the aggregate, or are current and at market rates, and their carrying value approximates fair value.
55
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
F. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consists of the following:
December 31, | ||||||||
2002 | 2001 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Land
|
$ | 7,199 | $ | 9,238 | ||||
Buildings
|
24,754 | 31,677 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements
|
56,947 | 45,765 | ||||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
213,608 | 246,707 | ||||||
302,508 | 333,387 | |||||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(136,913 | ) | (171,744 | ) | ||||
$ | 165,595 | $ | 161,643 | |||||
G. Notes Payable
Notes payable consist of the following:
December 31, | ||||||||
2002 | 2001 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Syndicated credit agreement, unsecured, interest
due quarterly at LIBOR plus 1.00% (2.38% at December 31,
2002), unused portion of $250,000 at December 31, 2002
|
$ | 120,349 | $ | 135,000 | ||||
Unsecured notes, net of discount, interest
payable semi-annually at 7.3%, due August 2011
|
249,135 | 249,034 | ||||||
Lease-backed notes, secured by security interest
in certain leases and underlying equipment, interest due monthly
at various fixed rates ranging from 5.65% 9.00%, due at
various dates in 2007
|
65,071 | 109,866 | ||||||
Bank promissory notes, secured by equipment,
principal and interest due monthly with various interest rates
and maturities
|
26,301 | 43,162 | ||||||
Bank promissory notes, secured by security
interests in certain leases and underlying equipment, interest
due monthly at various fixed rates (4.58% 10.50% at
December 31, 2002), due at various maturities
|
16,340 | 16,059 | ||||||
Other promissory notes with various interest
rates and maturities
|
16,262 | 12,569 | ||||||
$ | 493,458 | $ | 565,690 | |||||
The carrying value of the Companys notes payable, excluding lease-backed notes payable, approximated estimated fair values at December 31, 2002 and 2001. The fair value of the Companys fixed rate and variable rate notes payable is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on current market interest rates and comparison of interest rates being paid to the Companys current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
In connection with the Chicago Title merger, the Company entered into a syndicated credit agreement. The credit agreement provides for three distinct credit facilities:
| $100.0 million, 18 month revolving credit facility due September 30, 2001, which was repaid and terminated on January 24, 2001; | |
| $250.0 million, 6 year revolving credit facility due March 19, 2006; and |
56
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
| $450.0 million term loan facility with a 6 year amortization period, due March 19, 2006. |
The credit agreement bears interest at a variable rate of interest based on the debt ratings assigned to the Company by certain independent agencies, and is unsecured. In May 2002, the interest rate was reduced to LIBOR plus 1.00% from LIBOR plus 1.125%, as a result of an upgrade to the Companys debt ratings. Amounts borrowed under the credit agreement were used to pay the cash portion of the merger consideration, to refinance previously existing indebtedness, to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the merger and to fund other general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2002, $120.3 million was outstanding under the Companys credit agreement and the Company had $250.0 million of borrowings available under its credit agreement.
The credit agreement and other debt facilities impose certain affirmative and negative covenants on the Company relating to current debt ratings, certain financial ratios related to liquidity, net worth, capitalization, investments, acquisitions and restricted payments, and certain dividend restrictions. The Company is in compliance with all of its debt covenants as of December 31, 2002.
On January 24, 2001, the Company issued 9,740,500 shares of its common stock at a public offering price of $27.69 per share. Proceeds from this offering, net of underwriting discounts and commissions and other related expenses, were $256.3 million. Net proceeds of $100.0 million were used to repay in full and terminate the $100.0 million, 18 month revolving credit facility and net proceeds of $149.5 million were used to pay down in full the $250.0 million, 6 year revolving credit facility. The remainder of the cash proceeds are available for general corporate purposes.
On August 20, 2001, the Company completed a public offering of $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.3% notes due August 15, 2011. The notes were priced at 99.597% of par to yield 7.358% annual interest. As such, the Company recorded a discount of $1.0 million, which is netted against the $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of notes. The discount is amortized to interest expense on a straight-line basis over 10 years, the term of the notes. The Company received net proceeds of $247.0 million, after expenses, which were used to pay down a portion of the $450.0 million, 6-year term loan facility.
On March 11, 2003, the Company completed a public offering of $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.25% notes due March 15, 2013. The notes were priced at 99.247% of par to yield 5.433% annual interest. The Company received net proceeds of approximately $246.1 million, after expenses, which will be used to pay a portion of the $1,050.0 million purchase price of ALLTEL Information Services, Inc. See Note P.
Principal maturities, including the $250.0 million, 5.25% notes issued subsequent to December 31, 2002, are as follows (dollars in thousands):
2003
|
$ | 68,541 | ||
2004
|
51,098 | |||
2005
|
47,529 | |||
2006
|
11,510 | |||
2007
|
65,638 | |||
Thereafter
|
499,142 | |||
$ | 743,458 | |||
57
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
H. Income Taxes
Income tax expense consists of the following:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Current
|
$ | 266,913 | $ | 159,580 | $ | 58,687 | ||||||
Deferred
|
39,555 | 46,873 | 27,937 | |||||||||
$ | 306,468 | $ | 206,453 | $ | 86,624 | |||||||
Total income tax expense was allocated as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations
|
$ | 306,468 | $ | 209,488 | $ | 86,624 | ||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle
|
| (3,035 | ) | | ||||||||
$ | 306,468 | $ | 206,453 | $ | 86,624 | |||||||
The effective income tax rate differs from the statutory income tax rate as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||
Statutory income tax rate
|
35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||||
Tax exempt interest income
|
(0.8 | ) | (1.6 | ) | (3.8 | ) | ||||||
Goodwill amortization
|
| 3.7 | 6.9 | |||||||||
Non-deductible expenses
|
0.2 | 0.7 | 2.0 | |||||||||
State taxes, net of Federal deduction
|
1.7 | 2.0 | 2.8 | |||||||||
Other
|
(0.1 | ) | 0.3 | 1.2 | ||||||||
36.0 | % | 40.1 | % | 44.1 | % | |||||||
58
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2002 and 2001 consist of the following:
December 31, | |||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
Deferred Tax Assets:
|
|||||||||||
Provision for claim losses in excess of statutory
amounts
|
$ | 74,580 | $ | 78,450 | |||||||
Employee benefit accruals
|
58,642 | 57,821 | |||||||||
Excess book over tax provision for bad debts
|
1,458 | 2,635 | |||||||||
Accrued liabilities
|
8,474 | 5,914 | |||||||||
Deferred state income taxes
|
9,704 | 12,997 | |||||||||
Deferred revenue
|
14,743 | 4,089 | |||||||||
Other assets
|
23,140 | 30,007 | |||||||||
Net operating loss carryovers
|
5,723 | 17,034 | |||||||||
Lease accounting
|
3,271 | 4,881 | |||||||||
199,735 | 213,828 | ||||||||||
Less: Valuation allowance
|
| | |||||||||
Total deferred tax assets
|
199,735 | 213,828 | |||||||||
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
|
|||||||||||
Section 338(h)(10) gain deferral
|
1,257 | 1,244 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
29,582 | 14,757 | |||||||||
Other liabilities
|
83,563 | 79,108 | |||||||||
Investment securities
|
23,053 | 8,802 | |||||||||
Other
|
6,723 | 3,104 | |||||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
144,178 | 107,015 | |||||||||
Net deferred tax asset
|
$ | 55,557 | $ | 106,813 | |||||||
Based upon the Companys current and historical pretax earnings, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefit of its existing deferred tax assets. Management believes the existing net deductible temporary differences will reverse during periods in which the Company generates net taxable income. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will generate any earnings or any specific level of continuing earnings in future years. Certain tax planning or other strategies could be implemented, if necessary, to supplement income from operations to fully realize recorded tax benefits.
Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. No valuation allowance is necessary for 2002 and 2001.
The Companys 1998 and 1999 federal income tax returns are currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service. Based on information currently available, management does not believe the outcome of these examinations will have a material impact on the Company.
59
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
I. Summary of Reserve for Claim Losses
A summary of the reserve for claim losses follows:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Beginning balance
|
$ | 881,053 | $ | 907,482 | $ | 239,962 | |||||||||
Reserves assumed
|
| | 669,837 | (1) | |||||||||||
Claim loss provision related to:
|
|||||||||||||||
Current year
|
207,290 | 161,669 | 108,985 | ||||||||||||
Prior years
|
(29,899 | ) | (26,945 | ) | (11,663 | ) | |||||||||
Total claim loss provision
|
177,391 | 134,724 | 97,322 | ||||||||||||
Claims paid, net of recoupments related to:
|
|||||||||||||||
Current year
|
(10,058 | ) | (9,387 | ) | (6,479 | ) | |||||||||
Prior years
|
(160,413 | ) | (151,766 | ) | (93,160 | ) | |||||||||
Total claims paid, net of recoupments
|
(170,471 | ) | (161,153 | ) | (99,639 | ) | |||||||||
Ending balance
|
$ | 887,973 | $ | 881,053 | $ | 907,482 | |||||||||
Provision for claim losses as a percentage of
title insurance premiums
|
5.0 | % | 5.0 | % | 5.0 | % | |||||||||
(1) | In connection with the Chicago Title merger on March 20, 2000, the Company assumed Chicago Titles then outstanding reserve for claim losses. |
The favorable development on prior years loss reserves during 2002, 2001 and 2000 was attributable to lower than expected payment levels on recent issue years which included periods of increased resale activity as well as a high proportion of refinance business. As a result, title policies issued in prior years have been replaced by the more recently issued policies, therefore generally terminating much of the loss exposure on the previously issued policies.
J. Commitments and Contingencies
The Companys title insurance underwriting subsidiaries are, in the ordinary course of business, subject to claims made under, and from time-to-time are named as defendants in legal proceedings relating to, policies of insurance they have issued or other services performed on behalf of insured policyholders and other customers. The Company believes that the reserves reflected in its Consolidated Financial Statements are adequate to pay losses and loss adjustment expenses which may result from such claims and proceedings; however, such estimates may be more or less than the amount ultimately paid when the claims are settled.
The Company has entered into various employment agreements with officers of the Company. These agreements provide for a specified salary to be paid to the officers and include incentive compensation arrangements. The agreements contain non-compete provisions. The terms of the agreements range from three to five years and normally contain extension provisions.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is involved in various pending and threatened litigation matters related to its operations, some of which include claims for punitive or exemplary damages. Management believes that no actions, other than those listed below, depart from customary litigation incidental to the business of the Company and that the resolution of all such litigation will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.
60
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company was named in class action lawsuits alleging irregularities and violations of law in connection with title and escrow practices. Three lawsuits are currently pending. Four previously filed lawsuits have been settled or dismissed. The three pending suits are filed by private parties in State court in Los Angeles. On October 8, 2002, the Company reached a settlement with the Attorney General and the State of California in the defendant class lawsuit filed against the Company and the Companys principal competitors on behalf of the entire title and escrow industry in California. Under the terms of the settlement, the Company will pay $5.1 million to the California Attorney General and a total of up to $26.0 million in the form of (i) cash payments to former escrow customers that meet certain eligibility requirements and file timely claims, and (ii) discounts on future escrow and title insurance services to eligible customers as agreed to in the settlement. In reaching the settlement, the Company denied any liability or wrongdoing. The settlement is contingent upon certain verification procedures which are currently ongoing.
Three lawsuits, captioned Schneider v. Fidelity National Financial, Inc. et al. (Case No. 03CC00017), Rossi V. Michael C. Lowther, et al. (Case No,. 03CC0021) and Miller v. Michael C. Lowther, et al. (Case No. 03CC00018), have been filed in Orange County Superior Court naming as defendants the Company and the members of the Board of Directors of ANFI. The complaints seek class action status and allege breach of fiduciary duty in connection with the approval of the merger by ANFIs directors. The Company believes the lawsuits are without merit.
In conducting its operations, the Company routinely holds customers assets in escrow, pending completion of real estate transactions. Certain of these amounts are maintained in segregated bank accounts and have not been included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company has a contingent liability relating to proper disposition of these balances for our customers which amounted to $6.7 billion at December 31, 2002. As a result of holding these customers assets in escrow, the Company has ongoing programs for realizing economic benefits during the year through favorable borrowing and vendor arrangements with various banks. There were no investments or loans outstanding as of December 31, 2002 related to these arrangements.
The Company leases certain of its premises and equipment under leases which expire at various dates. Several of these agreements include escalation clauses and provide for purchases and renewal options for periods ranging from one to five years.
Future minimum operating lease payments are as follows (dollars in thousands):
2003
|
$ | 100,995 | |||
2004
|
79,270 | ||||
2005
|
60,927 | ||||
2006
|
43,710 | ||||
2007
|
29,707 | ||||
Thereafter
|
53,644 | ||||
Total future minimum operating lease payments
|
$ | 368,253 | |||
Rent expense incurred under operating leases during the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 was $126.0 million, $108.8 million and $86.5 million, respectively.
K. Regulation and Stockholders Equity
Title insurance companies, including underwriters, underwritten title companies and independent agents, are subject to extensive regulation under applicable state laws. Each insurance underwriter is usually subject to
61
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
a holding company act in its state of domicile which regulates, among other matters, the ability to pay dividends and investment policies. The laws of most states in which the Company transacts business establish supervisory agencies with broad administrative powers relating to issuing and revoking licenses to transact business, regulating trade practices, licensing agents, approving policy forms, accounting principles, financial practices, establishing reserve and capital and surplus as regards policyholders (capital and surplus) requirements, defining suitable investments for reserves and capital and surplus and approving rate schedules. Effective January 2001, the Companys insurance subsidiaries were required to prepare their statutory financial statements in accordance with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners Statements of Statutory Accounting Principles (Codification), subject to the adoption by its respective domiciliary states. The adoption of Codification did not have a material effect on the statutory capital and surplus of the Companys insurance subsidiaries.
Pursuant to statutory accounting requirements of the various states in which the Companys title insurance subsidiaries are licensed, they must defer a portion of premiums earned as an unearned premium reserve for the protection of policyholders and must maintain qualified assets in an amount equal to the statutory requirements. The level of unearned premium reserve required to be maintained at any time is determined by statutory formula based upon either the age, number of policies and dollar amount of policy liabilities underwritten or the age and dollar amount of statutory premiums written. As of December 31, 2002, the combined statutory unearned premium reserve required and reported for the Companys title insurance subsidiaries was $861.4 million.
The insurance commissioners of their respective states of domicile regulate the Companys title insurance subsidiaries. Regulatory examinations usually occur at three-year intervals, and certain of these examinations are currently ongoing.
The Companys title insurance subsidiaries are subject to regulations that restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other distributions of cash or property to their immediate parent company without prior approval from the Department of Insurance of their respective states of domicile. During 2003, the Companys title insurance subsidiaries can pay dividends or make other distributions to the Company of $114.9 million.
The combined statutory capital and surplus of the Companys title insurance subsidiaries was $614.8 million, $514.7 million and $461.4 million as of December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The combined statutory earnings of the Companys title insurance subsidiaries were $162.6 million, $162.5 million and $87.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
As a condition to continued authority to underwrite policies in the states in which the Companys title insurance subsidiaries conduct their business, they are required to pay certain fees and file information regarding their officers, directors and financial condition. In addition, the Companys escrow and trust business is subject to regulation by various state banking authorities.
Pursuant to statutory requirements of the various states in which the Companys title insurance subsidiaries are domiciled, they must maintain certain levels of minimum capital and surplus. Each of the Companys title underwriters has complied with the minimum statutory requirements as of December 31, 2002.
The Companys underwritten title companies are also subject to certain regulation by insurance regulatory or banking authorities, primarily relating to minimum net worth. Minimum net worth of $7.5 million, $2.5 million and $3.0 million is required for Fidelity National Title Company, Fidelity National Title Company of California and Chicago Title Company, respectively. The Company is in compliance with all of its respective minimum net worth requirements at December 31, 2002.
62
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
On March 17, 1999, the Companys Board of Directors approved an increase to the number of shares of outstanding Company common stock authorized for purchase under the Companys previously announced purchase program. The additional authorization permitted the Company to purchase up to 4,840,000 shares. On September 13, 1999, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved a second increase of 2,420,000 shares, bringing the total number of shares of outstanding Company common stock authorized for purchase to 7,260,000. As of December 31, 1999, the Company had purchased 6,523,000 shares at an average purchase price of $12.55 per share totaling $81.9 million. In January 2000 the Company purchased another 47,432 shares of its common stock at an average purchase price of $11.60 per share totaling $551. In March 2000, the Company retired all of its 14,610,200 shares held as treasury stock totaling $136.8 million.
On January 24, 2001, the Company issued 9,740,500 shares of its common stock at a public offering price of $27.69 per share. Proceeds from this offering, net of underwriting discounts and commissions and other related expenses, were $256.3 million. Net proceeds were primarily used to pay down existing indebtedness. See Note G.
On April 24, 2001, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the Company to purchase up to 6,050,000 shares of its common stock. Purchases may be made from time to time by the Company in the open market or in block purchases or in privately negotiated transactions depending on market conditions and other factors. As part of this program, the Company has repurchased a total of 1,100,000 shares of common stock for $22.9 million, at an average price of $20.84 per share. In May 2002, the Company retired those 1,100,000 shares held as treasury stock.
On April 24, 2002, The Companys Board of Directors approved a three-year stock repurchase program, whereby the Company will devote a portion of its annual cash flow from operations to the systematic repurchase of shares of its common stock. Purchases may be made by the Company from time to time in the open market, in block purchases or in privately negotiated transactions. As of December 31, 2002, the Company has repurchased a total of 2,035,170 shares of common stock for $61.2 million, or an average price of $30.08. The amount repurchased includes 439,670 shares of common stock purchased from certain of the Companys officers and directors during the third quarter of 2002, of which 165,950 shares were accepted as full payment for certain of these notes, including accrued interest. See Note E. In December 2002, the Company retired 563,570 of these shares held as treasury stock, totaling $14.3 million. Through March 18, 2003, a total of 2,546,070 shares of common stock has been repurchased for $78.0 million, or an average price of $30.62.
L. Employee Benefit Plans
Stock Purchase Plan
In 1987, stockholders approved the adoption of an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). Under the terms of the ESPP and subsequent amendments, eligible employees may voluntarily purchase, at current market prices, shares of the Companys common stock through payroll deductions. Pursuant to the ESPP, employees may contribute an amount between 3% and 15% of their base salary and certain commissions. The Company contributes varying amounts as specified in the ESPP. During the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, 713,336, 796,176 and 718,713 shares, respectively, were purchased and allocated to employees, based upon their contributions, at an average price of $28.29, $22.04 and $15.01 per share, respectively. The Company contributed $7.5 million or the equivalent of 266,738 shares for the year ended December 31, 2002; $5.3 million or the equivalent of 237,962 shares for the year ended December 31, 2001 and $4.0 million or the equivalent of 265,385 shares for the year ended December 31, 2000 in accordance with the employers matching contribution.
63
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
401(k) Profit Savings Plan
The Company offers the Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (401(k) Plan), a qualified voluntary contributory savings plan, available to substantially all Fidelity employees. Eligible employees may contribute up to 15% of their pretax annual compensation, up to the amount allowed pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code. Beginning in April 2000, the Company began matching 50% of each dollar of employee contribution up to six percent of the employees total compensation. The Companys cost for the 401(k) Plan for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 was $17.5 million, $13.9 million and $5.0 million, respectively.
In connection with the Chicago Title merger, the Company assumed Chicago Titles contributory defined contribution savings and profit sharing plan for eligible Chicago Title employees. Eligible employees contributed up to 13% of their pretax base compensation, up to the amount allowed pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code. The Company matched employee contributions from a minimum of $0.25 up to a maximum of $1.50 for each dollar of employee contribution up to six percent of the employees base salary, subject to the Companys return on equity for the year. The Companys cost for this plan was $8.2 million for the period from April 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000. Effective January 1, 2001, this plan was merged with and into the 401(k) Plan.
Stock Option Plans
The Companys 1987 Stock Option Plan expired in December 1997. Options generally had a term of five to 11 years from date of grant, became exercisable at the discretion of the Board of Directors and were priced at not less than the fair market value on the date of grant. A total of 2,192,302 shares were available for grants of options under this plan.
The Companys 1991 Stock Option Plan (1991 Plan) expired in March 2001. Options generally had a term of 12 years from the date of grant and were exercisable subject to the terms and conditions set by the Board of Directors. The price per share was determined at the date of grant and may be less than the fair market value of the common stock at the date of grant to reflect the application of the optionees deferred bonus, if applicable. The 1991 Plan allows for exercise prices with a fixed discount from the quoted market price. A total of 5,020,018 shares were available for grants of options under this plan.
Options were granted in 2000 at an exercise price of $5.58 to key employees of the Company who applied deferred bonuses expensed in 1999 amounting to $4.4 million to the exercise price. The exercise price of these options decreases approximately $.29 per year through 2005 and $.19 per share from 2006 through 2011, at which time the exercise price will be $3.02. In 2001, options were granted at an exercise price of $19.71 to key employees of the Company who applied deferred bonuses expensed in 2000 amounting to $4.9 million to the exercise price. The exercise price of these options decreases approximately $.29 per year through 2006 and $.19 per share from 2007 through 2012, at which time the exercise price will be $17.15.
In 1994, stockholders approved the adoption of the 1993 Stock Plan (1993 Plan). The number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 1993 Plan is 1,328,670. The per share option price is determined at the date of grant, provided that the price for incentive stock options shall not be less than 100% of their market value or award stock shares. The 1993 Plan also contains an automatic grant of non-qualified stock options to non-employee directors at an exercise price equal to 100% of fair value at date of grant, and the right to exercise such options shall vest equally over three years. Stock options granted under the 1993 plan are exercisable subject to the terms and conditions set by the Board of Directors, however, options shall be exercisable no earlier than six months nor later than 10 years following the grant date.
64
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In connection with the 1998 acquisition of FNF Capital (formerly known as Granite), which was accounted for as a pooling-of-interests, the Company assumed 829,713 options outstanding under Granites existing stock option plan (Granite Plan). The Granite Plan provides that qualified stock options be granted at an exercise price equal to fair market value on the date of the grant, and must be at least 110% of fair market value when granted to a 10% or more stockholder. The term of all qualified stock options granted under the Granite Plan may not exceed 10 years, except the term of qualified stock options granted to a 10% or more stockholder, which may not exceed five years. The Granite Plan provides that non-qualified stock options be granted at an exercise price not less than 85% of the fair market value on the date of grant. The term of all non-qualified stock options granted under the Granite Plan may not exceed 10 years, except the term of non-qualified stock options granted to a 10% or more stockholder, which may not exceed five years.
During 1998, stockholders approved the adoption of the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (1998 Plan). The 1998 Plan authorizes up to 6,996,220 shares of common stock, plus an additional 266,200 shares of common stock on the date of each annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company, for issuance under the terms of the 1998 Plan. The 1998 Plan provides for grants of incentive stock options as defined in Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, non-qualified stock options and rights to purchase shares of common stock (Purchase Rights). The term of options may not exceed 10 years from the date of grant (five years in the case of a person who owns or is deemed to own more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company), and the right to exercise such options shall vest equally over three years. The option exercise price for each share granted pursuant to an incentive stock option may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share of common stock at the time such option is granted (110% of fair market value in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a person who owns more than 10% of the combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company). There is no minimum purchase price for shares of common stock purchased pursuant to a Purchase Right, and any such purchase price shall be determined by the Board of Directors.
In connection with the merger of Chicago Title, the Company assumed the options outstanding under Chicago Titles existing stock option plans: the 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the Directors Stock Option Plan. Pursuant to the terms of the merger, options under these plans, totaling 3,857,787, became fully vested on March 20, 2000. The options granted in accordance with these two plans generally have a term of five to 10 years.
In 2001, stockholders approved the adoption of the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (2001 Plan). The 2001 Plan authorized up to 2,686,200 shares of common stock, plus an additional 242,000 shares of common stock on the date of each annual meeting of stockholders of the Company, for issuance under the terms of the 2001 Plan. The 2001 Plan provides for grants of incentive stock options as defined in Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, nonqualified stock options, rights to purchase shares of common stock (Purchase Rights) and deferred shares. The term of options may not exceed 10 years from the date of grant (five years in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a person who owns or is deemed to own more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company), and are exercisable subject to the terms and conditions set by the Board of Directors. The option exercise price for each share granted pursuant to an incentive stock option may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share of common stock at the time such option is granted (110% of fair value in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a person who owns more than 10% of the combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company). The option exercise price for each share granted pursuant to a nonqualified stock option may be less than the fair value of the common stock at the date of grant to reflect the application of the optionees deferred bonus, if applicable. The 2001 Plan allows for exercise prices with a fixed discount from the quoted market price only for those key employees of the Company who applied deferred bonuses expensed in 2001. Options were granted in 2002 at an exercise price of $15.68 to key employees of the Company who applied
65
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
deferred bonuses expensed in 2001 amounting to $5.7 million to the exercise price. The exercise price of these options decreases approximately $.48 per year through 2007 and $.31 per year from 2008 through 2013, at which time the exercise price will be $11.45. The Company recorded compensation expense relating to the exercise price decrease in the 1991 and 2001 Plans of $829, $674 and $473, for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Transactions under all stock option plans, including stock options granted by the Companys Board of Directors which are outside of the Companys stock option plans, are as follows:
Weighted Average | |||||||||||||
Shares | Exercise Price | Exercisable | |||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 1999
|
6,717,835 | $ | 10.24 | 5,493,428 | |||||||||
Options assumed in Chicago Title merger
|
3,857,787 | 10.28 | |||||||||||
Granted
|
3,445,889 | 11.04 | |||||||||||
Exercised
|
(4,342,381 | ) | 9.51 | ||||||||||
Cancelled
|
(219,692 | ) | 13.92 | ||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2000
|
9,459,438 | $ | 10.92 | 6,969,853 | |||||||||
Granted
|
2,896,602 | 19.57 | |||||||||||
Exercised
|
(1,201,192 | ) | 8.45 | ||||||||||
Cancelled
|
(171,441 | ) | 16.18 | ||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2001
|
10,983,407 | $ | 13.41 | 8,871,920 | |||||||||
Granted
|
2,186,949 | 22.98 | |||||||||||
Exercised
|
(3,490,634 | ) | 11.93 | ||||||||||
Cancelled
|
(20,434 | ) | 20.51 | ||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2002
|
9,659,288 | $ | 16.10 | 7,504,484 | |||||||||
The following table summarizes information related to stock options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2002:
December 31, 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
Range of | Number | Remaining | Exercise | Number | Exercise | |||||||||||||||||
Exercise Prices | of Shares | Contractual Life | Price | of Shares | Price | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 1.72 7.09 | 981,069 | 5.34 | $ | 5.73 | 981,069 | $ | 5.73 | ||||||||||||||
7.84 8.61 | 961,652 | 1.98 | 8.12 | 961,652 | 8.12 | |||||||||||||||||
8.63 12.09 | 1,548,425 | 5.94 | 10.32 | 1,514,243 | 10.32 | |||||||||||||||||
12.25 16.64 | 1,675,558 | 8.31 | 15.81 | 1,437,200 | 15.81 | |||||||||||||||||
17.84 18.90 | 54,450 | 8.34 | 18.19 | 20,167 | 18.26 | |||||||||||||||||
19.30 19.30 | 1,393,520 | 8.29 | 19.30 | 709,052 | 19.30 | |||||||||||||||||
19.42 20.05 | 1,314,775 | 7.71 | 19.65 | 1,294,206 | 19.65 | |||||||||||||||||
20.92 23.30 | 945,246 | 8.33 | 22.21 | 462,365 | 21.91 | |||||||||||||||||
23.47 29.24 | 156,593 | 6.50 | 26.15 | 124,530 | 25.72 | |||||||||||||||||
33.20 33.20 | 628,000 | 9.98 | 33.20 | | | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 1.72 33.20 | 9,659,288 | 7.00 | $ | 16.10 | 7,504,484 | $ | 13.94 | ||||||||||||||
66
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (Opinion 25) and related Interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. As discussed below, in managements opinion, the alternative fair value accounting provided for under Statement of Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation (SFAS 123) requires use of option valuation models that were not developed for use in valuing employee stock options. Under Opinion 25, when the exercise price of the Companys employee stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of the grant, no compensation expense is recognized.
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that do not have vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Companys stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the value of an estimate, in managements opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.
Pro forma information regarding net earnings and earnings per share is required by SFAS 123, and has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options under the fair value method of that statement. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions. The risk free interest rates used in the calculation is the rate that corresponds to the weighted average expected life of an option. The risk free interest rate used for options granted during 2002, 2001 and 2000 was 2.0%, 4.3% and 5.1%, respectively. A volatility factor for the expected market price of the common stock of 44%, 47% and 50% were used for options granted in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The expected dividend yield used for 2002, 2001 and 2000 was 1.3%, 1.5% and 1.2%, respectively. A weighted average expected life of 3.25 years was used for 2002 and 5.0 years was used for 2001 and 2000. The weighted average fair value of each option granted during 2002, 2001 and 2000 was $8.79, $9.27 and $6.06, respectively.
For purpose of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized into expense over the options vesting period. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Net earnings, as reported
|
$ | 531,717 | $ | 305,476 | $ | 108,315 | |||||||
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in
reported net earnings, net of related tax effects
|
531 | 404 | 264 | ||||||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value based methods for all
awards, net of related tax effects
|
(10,990 | ) | (14,607 | ) | (9,024 | ) | |||||||
Pro forma net earnings
|
$ | 521,258 | $ | 291,273 | $ | 99,555 | |||||||
Earnings per share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic as reported
|
$ | 5.58 | $ | 3.25 | $ | 1.52 | |||||||
Basic pro forma
|
$ | 5.47 | $ | 3.10 | $ | 1.40 | |||||||
Diluted as reported
|
$ | 5.38 | $ | 3.15 | $ | 1.47 | |||||||
Diluted pro forma
|
$ | 5.26 | $ | 3.00 | $ | 1.34 |
67
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Pension Plans |
In connection with the Chicago Title merger, the Company also assumed Chicago Titles noncontributory defined contribution plan and noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (the Pension Plan).
Contributions to the noncontributory defined contribution plan are based upon salary and length of service with the Company. Contributions are invested in a group of mutual funds as directed by the employee. The Companys cost for this plan was $2.0 million for the period from April 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000. Effective January 1, 2001, this plan was frozen.
The Pension Plan covers certain Chicago Title employees. The benefits are based on years of service and the employees average monthly compensation in the highest 60 consecutive calendar months during the 120 months ending at retirement or termination. The Companys funding policy is to contribute annually at least the minimum required contribution under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Contributions are intended to provide not only for benefits accrued to date, but also for those expected to be earned in the future. The Company made no contribution for the period from April 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000. Effective December 31, 2000, the Pension Plan was frozen and there will be no future credit given for years of service or changes in salary.
The following table sets forth the funded status of the Pension Plan and amounts reflected in the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000:
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||
Change in Benefit Obligation:
|
||||||||||||||
Net benefit obligation as of beginning of period
|
$ | 103,268 | $ | 98,911 | $ | 108,101 | ||||||||
Service cost
|
| | 3,095 | |||||||||||
Interest cost
|
7,582 | 7,276 | 6,449 | |||||||||||
Actuarial loss
|
16,085 | 12,452 | 483 | |||||||||||
Gross benefits paid
|
(15,803 | ) | (15,371 | ) | (19,217 | ) | ||||||||
Net benefit obligation at end of year
|
$ | 111,132 | $ | 103,268 | $ | 98,911 | ||||||||
Change in Pension Plan Assets:
|
||||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets as of beginning of
period
|
$ | 76,019 | $ | 91,162 | $ | 106,171 | ||||||||
Adjustment to assets at beginning of period
|
| | 536 | |||||||||||
Actual return on plan assets
|
(7,595 | ) | (5,031 | ) | 3,672 | |||||||||
Employer contributions
|
13,611 | 5,259 | | |||||||||||
Gross benefits paid
|
(15,803 | ) | (15,371 | ) | (19,217 | ) | ||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
$ | 66,232 | $ | 76,019 | $ | 91,162 | ||||||||
Funded status at end of year
|
$ | (44,900 | ) | $ | (27,249 | ) | $ | (7,749 | ) | |||||
Unrecognized net actuarial (gain) loss
|
45,173 | 19,092 | (4,518 | ) | ||||||||||
Net amount recognized at end of year
|
$ | 273 | $ | (8,157 | ) | $ | (12,267 | ) | ||||||
Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87, Employers Accounting for Pensions, (SFAS No. 87) the measurement date shall be as of the date of the financial statements, or if used consistently from year to year, as of a date not more than three months prior to that date. The Companys measurement date is September 30.
68
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The net pension liability included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of December 31, 2002 and 2001 is $44.9 million and $27.2 million, respectively. The net pension liability at December 31, 2002 and 2001 includes the additional minimum pension liability adjustment of $26.1 million and $19.1 million, respectively, which was recorded as a net of tax charge of $15.9 million and $11.5 million to accumulated other comprehensive earnings in 2002 and 2001 in accordance with SFAS No. 87.
The principal weighted average assumptions used in the actuarial calculations of projected benefit obligations and net periodic pension expense are as follows: discount rate of 6.75% for 2002 and 7.25% for 2001 and 2000, and an expected return on Pension Plan assets of 9.0% for 2002, 2001 and 2000.
The components of net periodic (income) expense included in the results of operations for 2002, 2001 and from the period April 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000 are as follows:
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Service cost
|
$ | | $ | | $ | 3,095 | |||||||
Interest cost
|
7,582 | 7,276 | 6,449 | ||||||||||
Expected return on assets
|
(7,639 | ) | (8,029 | ) | (6,714 | ) | |||||||
Amortization of actuarial loss
|
634 | | | ||||||||||
Total net periodic (income) expense
|
$ | 577 | $ | (753 | ) | $ | 2,830 | ||||||
Postretirement Plans |
The Company assumed certain health care and life insurance benefits for retired Chicago Title employees in connection with the Chicago Title merger. Beginning on January 1, 2001, these benefits were offered to all employees who meet specific eligibility requirements. The costs of these benefit plans are accrued during the periods the employees render service.
The Company is both self-insured and fully insured for its postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plans, and the plans are not funded. The health care plans provide for insurance benefits after retirement and are generally contributory, with contributions adjusted annually. Postretirement life insurance benefits are contributory, with coverage amounts declining with increases in a retirees age.
The assumed health care cost trend rate used in measuring the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation was 11.0% in 2002, declining to 5.0% in 2009, 12.0% in 2001, declining to 5.0% in 2009 and 5.5% in 2000, declining to 5.0% in 2002. The discount rate used was 6.75% in 2002, 7.25% in 2001 and 7.75% in 2000. If the health care cost trend rate assumptions were increased 1.0%, the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 would increase by $1.6 million, $1.9 million and $3.3 million, respectively. The effect of this change on the sum of the service and interest cost would be an increase of $120 in 2002, $423 in 2001 and $590 in 2000. If the health care costs trend rate assumptions were decreased 1.0%, the accumulated post retirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 would decrease by $1.4 million, $1.7 million and $2.8 million, respectively. The effect of this change on the sum of the service and interest cost would be a decrease of $110 in 2002, $360 in 2001 and $480 in 2000.
69
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The accrued cost of the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation included in the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 is as follows:
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||
Change in Benefit Obligation:
|
||||||||||||||
Net benefit obligation as of beginning of period
|
$ | 22,405 | $ | 25,003 | $ | 25,645 | ||||||||
Service cost
|
247 | 890 | 490 | |||||||||||
Interest cost
|
1,546 | 1,688 | 1,531 | |||||||||||
Plan participants contributions
|
1,643 | 1,390 | 1,537 | |||||||||||
Plan amendments
|
| (10,901 | ) | | ||||||||||
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
360 | 6,051 | (1,131 | ) | ||||||||||
Gross benefits paid
|
(3,444 | ) | (1,716 | ) | (3,069 | ) | ||||||||
Net benefit obligation at end of year
|
$ | 22,757 | $ | 22,405 | $ | 25,003 | ||||||||
Change in Plan Assets:
|
||||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets as of beginning of
period
|
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Employer contributions
|
1,801 | 326 | 1,532 | |||||||||||
Plan participants contributions
|
1,643 | 1,390 | 1,537 | |||||||||||
Gross benefits paid
|
(3,444 | ) | (1,716 | ) | (3,069 | ) | ||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Funded status at end of year
|
$ | (22,757 | ) | $ | (22,405 | ) | $ | (25,003 | ) | |||||
Unrecognized net actuarial (gain) loss
|
4,950 | 4,920 | (1,131 | ) | ||||||||||
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
(7,019 | ) | (9,724 | ) | (1,013 | ) | ||||||||
Net accrued cost of accumulated postretirement
benefit obligation included in accounts payable and accrued
liabilities
|
$ | (24,826 | ) | $ | (27,209 | ) | $ | (27,147 | ) | |||||
Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 106, Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions, the measurement date shall be as of the date of the financial statements, or if used consistently from year to year, as of a date not more than three months prior to that date. The Companys measurement date is December 31.
The Companys postretirement health care and life insurance costs included in the results of operations for 2002, 2001 and from the period April 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000 are as follows:
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Service cost
|
$ | 247 | $ | 890 | $ | 490 | |||||||
Interest cost
|
1,546 | 1,687 | 1,531 | ||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost
|
(2,704 | ) | (1,413 | ) | | ||||||||
Amortization of actuarial loss
|
330 | | | ||||||||||
Total net periodic benefit cost
|
$ | (581 | ) | $ | 1,164 | $ | 2,021 | ||||||
70
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
M. Supplementary Cash Flow Information
The following supplemental cash flow information is provided with respect to interest and tax payments, as well as certain non-cash investing and financing activities.
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Cash paid during the year:
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 33,325 | $ | 40,221 | $ | 57,776 | |||||||
Income taxes
|
$ | 220,000 | $ | 124,100 | $ | 59,091 | |||||||
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|||||||||||||
Dividends declared and unpaid
|
$ | 11,718 | $ | 8,596 | $ | 6,981 | |||||||
N. Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk and Concentration of Risk
In the normal course of business the Company and certain of its subsidiaries enter into off-balance sheet credit risk associated with certain aspects of its title insurance business and other activities. The Company has various guarantees for agent loans totaling $1.3 million as of December 31, 2002.
The Company generates a significant amount of title insurance premiums in California and Texas. In 2002, 2001 and 2000 (on an unaudited pro forma basis, assuming the Chicago Title merger had been consummated on January 1, 2000), California and Texas accounted for 25.2% and 12.1%, 24.8% and 13.4% and 20.6% and 14.6% of total title premiums, respectively.
FNF Capital approved contingent fundings of approximately $9.7 million in leases at December 31, 2001. No contingent fundings were approved in 2002.
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents, short-term investments, lease receivables, residual interests in securitizations and trade receivables.
The Company places its cash equivalents and short-term investments with high credit quality financial institutions and, by policy, limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution. Investments in commercial paper of industrial firms and financial institutions are rated investment grade by nationally recognized rating agencies.
Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited because a large number of geographically diverse customers make up the Companys customer base, thus spreading the trade receivables credit risk. The Company controls credit risk through monitoring procedures.
71
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
O. Segment Information
Summarized financial information concerning the Companys reportable segments is shown in the following table. The amounts reported for Chicago Title for 2000 reflect only the period from March 20, 2000, the merger date, through December 31, 2000. Reportable segments are determined based on the organizational structure and types of products and services from which each reportable segment derives its revenue.
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 (dollars in thousands):
Real Estate | ||||||||||||||||
Title | Related | Corporate | ||||||||||||||
Insurance | Services | and Other | Total | |||||||||||||
Total revenue
|
$ | 4,590,573 | $ | 437,971 | $ | 54,096 | $ | 5,082,640 | ||||||||
Operating earnings
|
$ | 759,288 | $ | 81,063 | $ | 29,129 | $ | 869,480 | ||||||||
Interest and investment income, including
realized gains and losses
|
72,144 | 2,624 | 15,268 | 90,036 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
50,785 | 13,797 | 9,581 | 74,163 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
1,489 | 324 | 32,240 | 34,053 | ||||||||||||
Earnings before income taxes and minority interest
|
779,158 | 69,566 | 2,576 | 851,300 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense
|
280,497 | 25,044 | 927 | 306,468 | ||||||||||||
Minority interest
|
836 | 10,615 | 1,664 | 13,115 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss)
|
$ | 497,825 | $ | 33,907 | $ | (15 | ) | $ | 531,717 | |||||||
Assets
|
$ | 4,176,572 | $ | 437,134 | $ | 632,038 | $ | 5,245,744 | ||||||||
Goodwill
|
$ | 699,153 | $ | 165,413 | $ | 132,047 | $ | 996,613 | ||||||||
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2001 (dollars in thousands):
Real Estate | ||||||||||||||||
Title | Related | Corporate | ||||||||||||||
Insurance | Services | and Other | Total | |||||||||||||
Total revenue
|
$ | 3,507,935 | $ | 288,320 | $ | 77,852 | $ | 3,874,107 | ||||||||
Operating earnings
|
$ | 524,493 | $ | 37,689 | $ | 26,936 | $ | 589,118 | ||||||||
Interest and investment income, including
realized gains and losses
|
85,050 | 1,257 | 13,147 | 99,454 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
89,284 | 11,096 | 17,902 | 118,282 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
4,540 | 712 | 41,317 | 46,569 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes,
minority interest and cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle
|
515,719 | 27,138 | (19,136 | ) | 523,721 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
206,287 | 10,855 | (7,654 | ) | 209,488 | |||||||||||
Minority interest
|
169 | 595 | 2,284 | 3,048 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) before cumulative effect of
a change in accounting principle
|
309,263 | 15,688 | (13,766 | ) | 311,185 | |||||||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle, net of income tax benefit
|
| | (5,709 | ) | (5,709 | ) | ||||||||||
Net earnings (loss)
|
$ | 309,263 | $ | 15,688 | $ | (19,475 | ) | $ | 305,476 | |||||||
Assets
|
$ | 3,571,265 | $ | 368,769 | $ | 475,964 | $ | 4,415,998 | ||||||||
72
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2000 (dollars in thousands):
Real Estate | ||||||||||||||||
Title | Related | Corporate | ||||||||||||||
Insurance | Services | and Other | Total | |||||||||||||
Total revenue
|
$ | 2,486,703 | $ | 168,161 | $ | 87,130 | $ | 2,741,994 | ||||||||
Operating earnings (loss)
|
$ | 248,670 | $ | 24,296 | $ | (8,995 | ) | $ | 263,971 | |||||||
Interest and investment income, including
realized gains and losses
|
81,423 | 1,443 | 4,325 | 87,191 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
77,978 | 2,878 | 14,571 | 95,427 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
4,990 | 24 | 54,360 | 59,374 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes and
minority interest
|
247,125 | 22,837 | (73,601 | ) | 196,361 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
109,232 | 10,096 | (32,704 | ) | 86,624 | |||||||||||
Minority interest
|
130 | | 1,292 | 1,422 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss)
|
$ | 137,763 | $ | 12,741 | $ | (42,189 | ) | $ | 108,315 | |||||||
Assets
|
$ | 3,159,368 | $ | 172,858 | $ | 501,759 | $ | 3,833,985 | ||||||||
The activities of the reportable segments include the following:
Title Insurance |
This segment, consisting of title insurance underwriters and wholly-owned title insurance agencies, provides core title insurance and escrow services, including document preparation, collection and trust activities. This segment coordinates its activities with those of the real estate related services segment described below in order to offer the full range of real estate products and services required to execute and close a real estate transaction.
Real Estate Related Services |
This segment, consisting of various real estate related and ancillary service subsidiaries, offers the complementary specialized products and services required to execute and close a real estate transaction that are not offered by the title insurance segment described above. These services include property appraisal, credit reporting, exchange intermediary services, real estate tax services, home warranty insurance, foreclosure posting and publishing, loan portfolio services, flood certification, field services, property data and disclosure services, multiple listing services, and mortgage loan fulfillment services. These services require specialized expertise and have been centralized for efficiency and management purposes.
Corporate and Other |
The corporate segment consists of the operations of the parent holding company, as well as the operations of Micro General, which was merged with FNIS on July 9, 2002, and FNF Capital, Inc., as well as the issuance and repayment of corporate debt obligations. Certain after tax charges of $10.0 million recorded in 2001 and $13.4 million recorded in 2000 primarily relate to the corporate segment.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note A. Intersegment sales or transfers which occurred in the ordinary course of consolidated operations, have been eliminated from the segment information provided.
73
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
P. | Subsequent Events |
On January 28, 2003, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with ALLTEL Corporation, Inc., a Delaware corporation (ALLTEL), pursuant to which the Company will acquire from ALLTEL its financial services division, ALLTEL Information Services, Inc. (AIS), an Arkansas corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of ALLTEL. As a result of the acquisition, AIS will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. AIS is one of the worlds largest providers of information-based technology solutions and processing services to the mortgage and financial services industries. The transaction is expected to close by the end of the first quarter of 2003. Under the terms of the stock purchase agreement, all of the issued and outstanding shares of AIS common stock will be purchased by the Company for consideration consisting of $775.0 million in cash and $275.0 million in the Companys common stock. Consummation of the acquisition is subject to customary closing conditions. In connection with the stock purchase agreement, prior to closing the Company will enter into a stockholders agreement, a non-competition agreement and certain transition agreements with ALLTEL. The stockholders agreement will: (1) restrict the sale by ALLTEL of the Companys common stock received in the transaction for up to one year, (2) grant ALLTEL the right to designate one nominee to the Companys Board of Directors, so long as it continues to hold at least 50% of the shares of the Companys common stock received in the transaction, and (3) grant ALLTEL certain registration rights with respect to the Companys common stock it receives in the transaction. The non-competition agreement will prohibit, with certain exceptions, ALLTEL and its affiliates from engaging in the business relating to the assets acquired by the Company for a period of two years after the transaction. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, any goodwill recorded as a result of the acquisition of AIS will not be amortized. See Note A.
On March 11, 2003, the Company completed a public offering of $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.25% notes due March 15, 2013. The notes were priced at 99.247% of par to yield 5.433% annual interest. The Company received net proceeds of approximately $246.1 million, after expenses, which will be used to pay a portion of the $1,050.0 million purchase price of AIS.
On January 9, 2003, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with ANFI, Inc. The merger agreement was subsequently amended on February 21, 2003. Pursuant to the merger agreement, ANFI will merge with and into the Companys wholly-owned merger subsidiary. In the merger, each share of ANFI common stock (other than ANFI common stock the Company already owns) will be exchanged for 0.454 of a share of the Companys common stock. The consummation of the transaction is subject to the approval of ANFI stockholders. The ANFI stockholder meeting is currently scheduled to be held on March 26, 2003 and the Company currently anticipates closing the merger on March 27, 2003. The Company anticipates that it will issue approximately 3.2 million shares of its common stock to the ANFI stockholders in the merger.
Q. | Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
During the second quarter of 2001, the Company adopted Emerging Issues Task Force No. 99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets, (EITF 99-20). EITF 99-20 sets forth the rules for recognizing interest income on all credit-sensitive mortgage and asset-backed securities and certain prepayment-sensitive securities including agency interest-only strips, whether purchased or retained in securitization, and determining when these securities must be written down to fair value because of impairment. Adoption of EITF 99-20 requires the valuation of residual interests in securitizations to be recorded as a reduction to the carrying value of the residual interests through a charge to earnings when any portion of the decline in fair value is attributable to an impairment loss, rather than an unrealized loss in stockholders equity. As such, the
74
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Company recorded a charge of $5.7 million, net of income tax benefit of $3.0 million, in the second quarter of 2001.
In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141) and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142). SFAS No. 141 requires that all business combinations be accounted for under the purchase method. The statement further requires separate recognition of intangible assets that meet one of two criteria. The statement applies to all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001.
SFAS No. 142 requires that an intangible asset that is acquired shall be initially recognized and measured based on its fair value. The statement also provides that goodwill should not be amortized, but shall be tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate potential impairment, through a comparison of fair value to its carrying amount. SFAS No. 142 is generally effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2001 and the amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142 are effective for acquisitions subsequent to June 30, 2001. Beginning in 2002, the Company did not record goodwill amortization. As required by SFAS No. 142, the Company performed an annual goodwill impairment test on its reporting units and have determined its reporting units have a fair value in excess of its carrying amounts, therefore no goodwill impairment has been recorded. See Note A.
In October 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No. 144) which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. While SFAS No. 144 supersedes Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of, it retains many of the fundamental provisions of that statement. SFAS No. 144 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, (SFAS No. 146). This standard is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 146 is not expected to have a material effect on the Companys financial statements.
In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness to Others (FIN 45), an interpretation of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statements Nos. 5, 57 and 107 and a rescission of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 34. FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under guarantees issued. FIN 45 also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken. The initial recognition and measurement provisions of FIN 45 are applicable to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002 and are not expected to have a material effect on the Companys financial statements. The disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements of interim and annual periods ended after December 15, 2002. See Note N.
In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based CompensationTransition and Disclosurean amendment of SFAS No. 123 (SFAS No. 148). This statement provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. This statement also amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 and APB Opinion No. 28, Interim
75
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Financial Reporting, to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. Certain of the disclosure modifications are required for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002 and are included in the Notes to these Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company will implement SFAS No. 148 effective January 1, 2003 regarding disclosure requirements for condensed financial statements for interim periods. The Company has not yet determined whether they will voluntarily change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation.
During 2002, the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus on Issue No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables (EITF 00-21). EITF 00-21 provides an accounting model for an approach to determine whether a vendor should divide an arrangement with multiple deliverables into separate units of accounting. EITF 00-21 requires an analysis of whether a delivered item has stand-alone value to the customer, whether there is subjective and reliable evidence of fair value for the undelivered items, and whether delivery of the undelivered items is probable and substantially in control of the vendor if the arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item. Companies are required to adopt EITF 00-21 for fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2003. Companies may apply EITF 00-21 prospectively to new arrangements initiated after the date of adoption or as a cumulative-effect adjustment. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of EITF 00-21.
76
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
None.
PART III
Items 10, 11 and 13.
Within 120 days after the close of its fiscal year, the Company intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission a definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended, which will include the election of directors, the report of the compensation committee on annual compensation, certain relationships and related transactions and other business.
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
The following table provides information regarding securities authorized for issuance under the Companys equity compensation plans, as of December 31, 2002:
Number of Securities | |||||||||||||
Remaining Available | |||||||||||||
for Future Issuance | |||||||||||||
Number of Securities | Under Equity | ||||||||||||
to be Issued Upon | Weighted-Average | Compensation Plans | |||||||||||
Exercise of | Exercise Price of | (Excluding | |||||||||||
Outstanding Options, | Outstanding Options, | Securities Reflected | |||||||||||
Warrants and Rights | Warrants and Rights | in Column (a)) | |||||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | |||||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security
holders
|
8,300,103 | $ | 17.03 | 3,968,970 | (1) | ||||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by
security holders(2)
|
1,359,185 | 10.45 | | ||||||||||
Total
|
9,659,288 | $ | 16.10 | 3,968,970 | |||||||||
(1) | Excludes a total of 3,267,000 options available for automatic grant under the Companys 1998 and 2001 Plans on each annual meeting date throughout the life of the option plans. |
(2) | The equity compensation plans not approved by security holders represent options granted outside of the Companys stock option plans pursuant to various agreements approved by the Board of Directors of the Company. The options were granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying stock as of the date of grant, and have terms of 10 to 12 years. Additional information regarding these options is included in Note L of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, incorporated herein by reference. |
Within 120 days after the close of its fiscal year, the Company intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission a definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Act of 1934 as amended, which will include information regarding beneficial ownership of principal shareholders, directors and management.
Item 14. | Controls and Procedures |
Within 90 days prior to the date of this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in our periodic SEC reports. It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about
77
In addition, we reviewed our internal controls, and there have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect those controls subsequent to the date of their last evaluation; including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
PART IV
Item 15. | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K |
(a)(1) Financial Statements. The following is a list of the Consolidated Financial Statements of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries included in Item 8 of Part II:
Independent Auditors Report
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2002 and 2001
Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules. The following is a list of financial statement schedules filed as part of this annual report on Form 10-K:
Schedule II: Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (Parent Company Financial Statements)
Schedule V: Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or not required, or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.
(a)(3) The following exhibits are incorporated by reference or are set forth on pages to this Form 10-K:
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
3.1 | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, incorporated by reference from Form S-4, Registration No. 333-103067 | |||
3.2 | Restated Bylaws of Registrant, incorporated by reference from Form S-4, Registration No. 333-103067 | |||
10.4 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1987 Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference from Form S-1, Registration No. 33-11321* | |||
10.4.1 | Amendments to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1987 Stock Option Plan approved by the stockholders of the Company on March 24, 1989, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 33-34300* | |||
10.5 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1987 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, incorporated by reference from Form S-1, Registration No. 33-11321* | |||
10.5.1 | Amendments to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1987 Employee Stock Purchase Plan approved by the stockholders of the Company on March 24, 1989, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 33-15027* |
78
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
10.5.2 | Amendments to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1987 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 33-45709* | |||
10.5.3 | Amendments to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1987 Employee Stock Purchase Plan approved by the stockholders of the Company on June 15, 1993, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 33-64836* | |||
10.5.4 | Amendments to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1987 Employee Stock Purchase Plan approved by the stockholders of the Company on June 20, 1995, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 33-61983* | |||
10.6 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Defined Contribution Plan and Trust adopted January 1, 1990, incorporated by reference from Form 10-K filed January 29, 1991* | |||
10.6.1 | Amendments to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 33-56514* | |||
10.6.2 | The Fidelity National Financial Group 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 333-83054* | |||
10.7 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1991 Stock Option Plan, approved by the stockholders of the Company on July 15, 1992, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 33-45272* | |||
10.7.1 | Amendments to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1991 Stock Option Plan approved by the stockholders of the Company on June 15, 1993, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 33-64834* | |||
10.7.2 | Amendment to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1991 Stock Plan, approved by the stockholders of the Company on June 14, 1994, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 33-83026* | |||
10.7.3 | Amendment to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1991 Stock Option Plan and the 1998 Stock Option Plan, approved by the stockholders of the Company on June 17, 1998, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 333-61111* | |||
10.8 | 1996 Omnibus Stock Option Plan (Granite), incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 333-48411* | |||
10.9 | Two Stock Option Agreements and Amended Stock Award Agreement (Alamo), incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 333-64229* | |||
10.35 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1993 Stock Plan, approved by stockholders of the Company on June 14, 1994, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 33-83026* | |||
10.60 | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 1, 1999, by and between Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and Chicago Title Corporation and amended as of October 13, 1999, incorporated by reference from Form S-4, Registration No. 333-89163 | |||
10.61 | Credit Agreement, dated as of February 10, 2000, among Fidelity National Financial, Inc., as borrower, Bank of America, N.A., Chase Securities Inc., Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., and various Financial Institutions, as Lenders, incorporated by reference from Form 8-K, dated February 9, 2000 and filed February 15, 2000 | |||
10.61.1 | First amendment, dated as of March 20, 2001, to the Credit Agreement dated as of February 10, 2000, among Fidelity National Financial, Inc., as borrower, Bank of America, N.A., Chase Securities, Inc., Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., and Various Financial Institutions, as Lenders, included herein | |||
10.61.2 | Second amendment and waiver, dated as of July 12, 2001, to the Credit Agreement dated as of February 10, 2000, among Fidelity National Financial, Inc., as borrower, Bank of America, N.A., Chase Securities, Inc., Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., and Various Financial Institutions, as Lenders, included herein |
79
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
10.61.3 | Third amendment, dated as of February 26, 2003, to the Credit Agreement dated as of February 10, 2000, among Fidelity National Financial, Inc., as borrower, Bank of America, N.A., Chase Securities, Inc., Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., and Various Financial Institutions, as Lenders, included herein | |||
10.62 | Granite Financial, Inc. Omnibus Stock Plan of 1996, Amended and Restated as of April 24, 1997 and June 14, 1997, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 333-48111* | |||
10.63 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc., 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, approved by the stockholders of the Company on June 17, 1998, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 333-61111* | |||
10.64 | Chicago Title Corporation 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan and Chicago Title Corporation Directors Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 333-32806* | |||
10.65 | Amendment to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1991 Stock Option Plan, approved by the stockholders of the Company on June 12, 2000, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 333-52744* | |||
10.66 | Amendment to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, approved by the stockholders of the Company on June 12, 2000, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 333-52744* | |||
10.67 | Underwriting Agreement, dated January 24, 2001, by and among Fidelity National Financial, Inc., and Merrill Lynch & Co., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Bear Stearns & Co., Inc., Lehman Brothers Inc. and U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc., as representatives of the underwriters named therein, incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2000 | |||
10.68 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference from Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2001* | |||
10.69 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Inventive Plan, incorporated by reference from Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2001* | |||
10.70 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as Amended and Restated as of April 24, 2001, incorporated by reference from Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2001* | |||
10.72 | Employment Agreement by and between Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and Patrick F. Stone as of March 22, 2000, incorporated by reference from Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2001* | |||
10.73 | Employment Agreement by and between Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and Alan L. Stinson as of March 22, 2001, incorporated by reference from Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2001* | |||
10.74 | Employment Agreement by and between Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and Peter T. Sadowski as of April 11, 2001, incorporated by reference from Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2001* | |||
10.75 | 7.30% Note due August 15, 2011 of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. in the principal amount of $250,000,000 dated August 20, 2001, incorporated by reference from Current Report on Form 8-K, dated August 23, 2001 |
80
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
10.76 | Underwriting Agreement by and among Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and Lehman Brothers Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC and Bear Stearns & Co., Inc. dated August 13, 2001, incorporated by reference from Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 23, 2001 | |||
10.77 | Indenture by and between Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and The Bank of New York dated as of August 20, 2001, incorporated by reference from Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 23, 2001 | |||
10.78 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2001* | |||
10.79 | Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as January 28, 2003, by and between Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and ALLTEL Corporation, incorporated by reference from Current Report on Form 8-K, dated January 29, 2003 | |||
10.80 | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 9, 2003, by and among Fidelity National Financial, Inc., ANFI, Inc. and ANFI Merger Sub, Inc., as amended by the First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 21, 2003, incorporated by reference from Form S-4/ A, Registration No. 333-103067 | |||
10.81 | Underwriting Agreement by and among Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Lehman Brothers, Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC and Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc., dated March 6, 2003, incorporated by reference from Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 6, 2003 | |||
10.82 | 5.25% Note due March 15, 2013 of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. in the principal amount of $250,000,000 dated March 11, 2003, incorporated by reference from Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 6, 2003 | |||
21 | List of Subsidiaries | |||
23 | Independent Auditors Consent | |||
99.1 | Certification by Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Financial Reports Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, included herein | |||
99.2 | Certification by Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Financial Reports Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, included herein |
* | A management or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this report pursuant to Item 15(c) of Form 10-K. |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K. The Company filed reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ending December 31, 2002 as follows:
None
81
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. |
By: | /s/ WILLIAM P. FOLEY, II |
|
|
William P. Foley, II | |
Chief Executive Officer |
Date: March 21, 2003
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature | Title | Date | ||
/s/ WILLIAM P. FOLEY, II William P. Foley, II |
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | March 21, 2003 | ||
/s/ FRANK P. WILLEY Frank P. Willey |
Vice Chairman and Director | March 21, 2003 | ||
/s/ ALAN L. STINSON Alan L. Stinson |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | March 21, 2003 | ||
/s/ JOHN J. BURNS, JR. John J. Burns, Jr. |
Director | March 21, 2003 | ||
/s/ TERRY CHRISTENSEN Terry Christensen |
Director | March 21, 2003 | ||
/s/ JOHN F. FARRELL, JR. John F. Farrell, Jr. |
Director | March 21, 2003 | ||
/s/ PHILLIP G. HEASLEY Phillip G. Heasley |
Director | March 21, 2003 | ||
/s/ WILLIAM A. IMPARATO William A. Imparato |
Director | March 21, 2003 | ||
/s/ DONALD M. KOLL Donald M. Koll |
Director | March 21, 2003 | ||
/s/ DANIEL D. (RON) LANE Daniel D. (Ron) Lane |
Director | March 21, 2003 | ||
/s/ GENERAL WILLIAM LYON General William Lyon |
Director | March 21, 2003 | ||
/s/ PATRICK F. STONE Patrick F. Stone |
Director | March 21, 2003 | ||
J. Thomas Talbot |
Director | |||
/s/ CARY H. THOMPSON Cary H. Thompson |
Director | March 21, 2003 |
82
CERTIFICATIONS
I, William P. Foley, II certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Fidelity National Financial, Inc.; | |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; | |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report; | |
4. | The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: |
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; | |
b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and | |
c) | presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. | The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
a) | all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and | |
b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. | The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
By: | /s/ WILLIAM P. FOLEY, II |
|
|
William P. Foley, II | |
Chairman of the Board and | |
Chief Executive Officer |
Date: March 21, 2003
83
I, Alan L. Stinson, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Fidelity National Financial, Inc.; | |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; | |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report; | |
4. | The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: |
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; | |
b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and | |
c) | presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. | The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
a) | all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and | |
b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. | The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
By: | /s/ ALAN L. STINSON |
|
|
Alan L. Stinson | |
Executive Vice President and | |
Chief Financial Officer |
Date: March 21, 2003
84
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Under date of January 28, 2003, except as to Note P to the Consolidated Financial Statements, which is as of March 11, 2003, we reported on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related Consolidated Statements of Earnings, Comprehensive Earnings, Stockholders Equity and Cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002 which are included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. In connection with our audits of the aforementioned Consolidated Financial Statements, we also audited the related financial statement schedules as listed under Item 15(a)2. These financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statement schedules based on our audits.
In our opinion, such schedules, when considered in relation to the basic Consolidated Financial Statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note A to the Consolidated Financial Statements, effective January 1, 2002, Fidelity National Financial, Inc. fully adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which resulted in a change to the method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets after they have been initially recognized in the financial statements.
KPMG LLP |
Los Angeles, California
85
SCHEDULE II
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
December 31, | |||||||||
2002 | 2001 | ||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 5,553 | $ | 9,219 | |||||
Investment securities available for sale, at fair
value
|
161,484 | 67,314 | |||||||
Accounts receivable from subsidiaries
|
14,711 | | |||||||
Leases receivable, net
|
3,056 | 5,582 | |||||||
Notes receivable, net (related party
$2,804 in 2002 and $8,720 in 2001)
|
3,267 | 9,908 | |||||||
Investment in subsidiaries
|
2,439,623 | 1,924,147 | |||||||
Property and equipment, net
|
691 | 7,191 | |||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
12,196 | 11,456 | |||||||
Deferred tax asset
|
55,557 | 106,813 | |||||||
$ | 2,696,138 | $ | 2,141,630 | ||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY | |||||||||
Liabilities:
|
|||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
$ | 43,975 | $ | 61,645 | |||||
Notes payable
|
369,484 | 384,034 | |||||||
Accounts payable to subsidiaries
|
| 43,007 | |||||||
Income taxes payable
|
28,743 | 14,074 | |||||||
442,202 | 502,760 | ||||||||
Stockholders Equity:
|
|||||||||
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; authorized
3,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding none
|
| | |||||||
Common stock, $.0001 par value; authorized,
150,000,000 shares as of December 31, 2002 and 100,000,000
shares as of December 31, 2001; issued 97,176,975 as of
December 31, 2002 and 95,348,876 as of December 31,
2001
|
10 | 10 | |||||||
Additional paid-in capital
|
1,550,011 | 1,158,847 | |||||||
Retained earnings
|
738,522 | 498,073 | |||||||
2,288,543 | 1,656,930 | ||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings
|
12,303 | 4,866 | |||||||
Less treasury stock, 1,471,600 shares as of
December 31, 2002 and 1,100,000 shares as of
December 31, 2001, at cost
|
(46,910 | ) | (22,926 | ) | |||||
2,253,936 | 1,638,870 | ||||||||
$ | 2,696,138 | $ | 2,141,630 | ||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements.
86
SCHEDULE II (continued)
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC.
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND RETAINED EARNINGS
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||
Revenue:
|
|||||||||||||
Other fees and revenue
|
$ | 278 | $ | 100 | $ | 250 | |||||||
Interest and investment income
|
14,746 | 12,326 | 2,916 | ||||||||||
15,024 | 12,426 | 3,166 | |||||||||||
Expenses:
|
|||||||||||||
Other operating expenses
|
6,678 | 4,249 | 10,171 | ||||||||||
Interest expense
|
24,217 | 32,099 | 47,122 | ||||||||||
30,895 | 36,348 | 57,293 | |||||||||||
Loss before income tax benefit and equity in
earnings of subsidiaries
|
(15,871 | ) | (23,922 | ) | (54,127 | ) | |||||||
Income tax benefit
|
(6,348 | ) | (9,569 | ) | (23,928 | ) | |||||||
Loss before equity in earnings of subsidiaries
|
(9,523 | ) | (14,353 | ) | (30,199 | ) | |||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries
|
554,355 | 328,586 | 139,936 | ||||||||||
Earnings before minority interest and cumulative
effect of a change in accounting principle
|
544,832 | 314,233 | 109,737 | ||||||||||
Minority interest
|
13,115 | 3,048 | 1,422 | ||||||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle, net of income tax benefit of $3,035
|
(5,709 | ) | | ||||||||||
Net earnings
|
$ | 531,717 | $ | 305,476 | $ | 108,315 | |||||||
Basic earnings per share before cumulative effect
of a change in accounting principle
|
$ | 5.58 | $ | 3.31 | $ | 1.52 | |||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle
|
| (.06 | ) | | |||||||||
Basic net earnings per share
|
$ | 5.58 | $ | 3.25 | $ | 1.52 | |||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic basis
|
95,371 | 94,048 | 71,173 | ||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share before cumulative
effect of a change in accounting principle
|
$ | 5.38 | $ | 3.21 | $ | 1.47 | |||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle
|
| (.06 | ) | | |||||||||
Diluted net earnings per share
|
$ | 5.38 | $ | 3.15 | $ | 1.47 | |||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted basis
|
98,815 | 96,865 | 73,733 | ||||||||||
Retained earnings, beginning of year
|
$ | 498,073 | $ | 409,216 | $ | 327,785 | |||||||
Dividends declared
|
(41,607 | ) | (32,948 | ) | (26,884 | ) | |||||||
Effect of 10% stock dividend
|
(249,661 | ) | (183,671 | ) | | ||||||||
Net earnings
|
531,717 | 305,476 | 108,315 | ||||||||||
Retained earnings, end of year
|
$ | 738,522 | $ | 498,073 | $ | 409,216 | |||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements.
87
SCHEDULE II (continued)
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||||
Cash Flows From Operating
Activities:
|
|||||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
$ | 531,717 | $ | 305,476 | $ | 108,315 | |||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|||||||||||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
1,413 | 5,421 | 1,404 | ||||||||||||
Provision for losses on notes receivable
|
240 | 240 | 412 | ||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries
|
(554,355 | ) | (328,586 | ) | (139,936 | ) | |||||||||
Gain on sales of investments
|
(889 | ) | (2,808 | ) | (2,096 | ) | |||||||||
Tax benefit associated with the exercise of stock
options
|
21,329 | 8,814 | 17,000 | ||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in income taxes
|
47,235 | 65,275 | (12,081 | ) | |||||||||||
Net increase in prepaid expenses and other assets
|
(2,053 | ) | (3,299 | ) | (9,082 | ) | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in accounts payable
and accrued liabilities
|
(17,679 | ) | 17,435 | 9,203 | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities
|
26,958 | 67,968 | (26,861 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash Flows From Investing
Activities:
|
|||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sales of investments
|
33,564 | 7,006 | 12,897 | ||||||||||||
Purchases of investments
|
(44,522 | ) | (2,027 | ) | (5,767 | ) | |||||||||
Net (purchases) proceeds from short-term
investing activities
|
(84,558 | ) | 16,318 | (50,280 | ) | ||||||||||
Proceeds (purchases) of property and
equipment
|
6,500 | (691 | ) | | |||||||||||
Collections of notes receivable
|
6,401 | 1,100 | 2,977 | ||||||||||||
Additions to notes receivable
|
| (3,000 | ) | (2,511 | ) | ||||||||||
Additions to investment in subsidiaries
|
(12,533 | ) | (55,672 | ) | (694,851 | ) | |||||||||
Capital transactions of majority-owned
subsidiaries
|
(8,694 | ) | (7,262 | ) | | ||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(103,842 | ) | (44,228 | ) | (737,535 | ) | |||||||||
Cash Flows From Financing
Activities:
|
|||||||||||||||
Borrowings
|
| | 715,000 | ||||||||||||
Net proceeds from common stock offering
|
| 256,301 | | ||||||||||||
Net proceeds from issuance of notes
|
| 250,000 | | ||||||||||||
Debt service payments
|
(14,651 | ) | (527,965 | ) | (177,500 | ) | |||||||||
Dividends paid
|
(38,485 | ) | (31,333 | ) | (22,615 | ) | |||||||||
Purchases of treasury stock
|
(61,210 | ) | (22,926 | ) | (551 | ) | |||||||||
Exercise of stock options
|
50,350 | 11,852 | 46,521 | ||||||||||||
Net borrowings and dividends from subsidiaries
|
137,214 | 27,833 | 223,286 | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities
|
73,218 | (36,238 | ) | 784,141 | |||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents
|
(3,666 | ) | (12,498 | ) | 19,745 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
9,219 | 21,717 | 1,972 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
$ | 5,553 | $ | 9,219 | $ | 21,717 | |||||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements.
88
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
A. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (the Company) transacts substantially all of its business through its subsidiaries. The Parent Company Financial Statements should be read in connection with the aforementioned Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere herein.
B. | Notes Payable |
Notes payable consist of the following:
December 31, | ||||||||
2002 | 2001 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Syndicated credit agreement, unsecured, interest
due quarterly at LIBOR plus 1.00% (2.38% at December 31,
2002), unused portion of $250,000 at December 31, 2002
|
$ | 120,349 | $ | 135,000 | ||||
Unsecured notes, net of discount, interest
payable semi-annually at 7.3%, due August 2011
|
249,135 | 249,034 | ||||||
$ | 369,484 | $ | 384,034 | |||||
On March 11, 2003, the Company completed a public offering of $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.25% notes due March 15, 2013. The notes were priced at 99.247% of par to yield 5.433% annual interest. The Company received net proceeds of approximately $246.1 million, after expenses, which will be used to pay a portion of the $1,050.0 million purchase price of ALLTEL Information Services, Inc. See Note E.
Principal maturities, including the $250.0 million, 5.25% notes issued subsequent to December 31, 2002, are as follows (dollars in thousands):
2003
|
$ | 32,442 | ||
2004
|
36,628 | |||
2005
|
40,814 | |||
2006
|
10,465 | |||
2007
|
| |||
Thereafter
|
499,135 | |||
$ | 619,484 | |||
In the normal course of business the Company enters into off-balance sheet credit risk in the form of guarantees. As of December 31, 2002, subsidiary debt in the amount of $1.5 million was guaranteed by the Company.
89
C. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Cash paid during the year:
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 22,244 | $ | 19,565 | $ | 45,833 | |||||||
Income taxes
|
$ | 220,000 | $ | 124,100 | $ | 59,091 | |||||||
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|||||||||||||
Dividends declared and unpaid
|
$ | 11,718 | $ | 8,596 | $ | 6,981 | |||||||
D. Cash Dividends Received
The Company has received cash dividends from subsidiaries and affiliates of $165.2 million, $113.3 million and $167.3 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
E. Subsequent Events
On January 28, 2003, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with ALLTEL Corporation, Inc., a Delaware corporation (ALLTEL), pursuant to which the Company will acquire from ALLTEL its financial services division, ALLTEL Information Services, Inc. (AIS), an Arkansas corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of ALLTEL. As a result of the acquisition, AIS will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. AIS is one of the worlds largest providers of information-based technology solutions and processing services to the mortgage and financial services industries. The transaction is expected to close by the end of the first quarter of 2003. Under the terms of the stock purchase agreement, all of the issued and outstanding shares of AIS common stock will be purchased by the Company for consideration consisting of $775.0 million in cash and $275.0 million in the Companys common stock. Consummation of the acquisition is subject to customary closing conditions. In connection with the stock purchase agreement, prior to closing the Company will enter into a stockholders agreement, a non-competition agreement and certain transition agreements with ALLTEL. The stockholders agreement will: (1) restrict the sale by ALLTEL of the Companys common stock received in the transaction for up to one year, (2) grant ALLTEL the right to designate one nominee to the Companys Board of Directors, so long as it continues to hold at least 50% of the shares of the Companys common stock received in the transaction, and (3) grant ALLTEL certain registration rights with respect to the Companys common stock it receives in the transaction. The non-competition agreement will prohibit, with certain exceptions, ALLTEL and its affiliates from engaging in the business relating to the assets acquired by the Company for a period of two years after the transaction. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, any goodwill recorded as a result of the acquisition of AIS will not be amortized. See Note A.
On March 11, 2003, the Company completed a public offering of $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.25% notes due March 15, 2013. The notes were priced at 99.247% of par to yield 5.433% annual interest. The Company received net proceeds of approximately $246.1 million, after expenses, which will be used to pay a portion of the $1,050.0 million purchase price of AIS.
On January 9, 2003, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with ANFI, Inc. The merger agreement was subsequently amended on February 21, 2003. Pursuant to the merger agreement, ANFI will merge with and into the Companys wholly-owned merger subsidiary. In the merger, each share of ANFI common stock (other than ANFI common stock the Company already owns) will be exchanged for 0.454 of a share of the Companys common stock. The consummation of the transaction is subject to the approval of ANFI stockholders. The ANFI stockholder meeting is currently scheduled to be held on March 26, 2003 and the Company currently anticipates closing the merger on March 27, 2003. The Company anticipates that it will issue approximately 3.2 million shares of its common stock to the ANFI stockholders in the merger.
90
SCHEDULE V
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Column A | Column B | Column C | Column D | Column E | ||||||||||||||||||
Additions | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at | Charge to | Balance at | ||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Costs and | Other | Deduction | End of | ||||||||||||||||||
Description | of Period | Expenses | (Described) | (Described) | Period | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2002:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Reserve for claim losses
|
$ | 881,053 | $ | 177,391 | $ | | $ | 170,471 | (3) | $ | 887,973 | |||||||||||
Allowance on:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Leases
|
10,660 | 13,136 | | 12,530 | (4) | 11,266 | ||||||||||||||||
Trade receivables
|
25,255 | 7,355 | | 12,080 | (4) | 20,530 | ||||||||||||||||
Notes receivable
|
6,597 | 678 | | 4,565 | (4) | 2,710 | ||||||||||||||||
Goodwill amortization and amortization of
intangible assets
|
121,357 | 19,456 | | 5,580 | (5) | 135,233 | ||||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2001:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Reserve for claim losses
|
$ | 907,482 | $ | 134,724 | $ | | $ | 161,153 | (3) | $ | 881,053 | |||||||||||
Allowance on:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Leases
|
5,999 | 13,679 | | 9,018 | (4) | 10,660 | ||||||||||||||||
Trade receivables
|
19,660 | 6,121 | | 526 | (4) | 25,255 | ||||||||||||||||
Notes receivable
|
2,873 | 5,100 | | 1,376 | (4) | 6,597 | ||||||||||||||||
Goodwill amortization and amortization of
intangible assets
|
73,365 | 69,351 | | 21,359 | (5) | 121,357 | ||||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2000:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Reserve for claim losses
|
$ | 239,962 | $ | 97,322 | $ | 669,837 | (1) | $ | 99,639 | (3) | $ | 907,482 | ||||||||||
Allowance on:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Leases
|
13,961 | 4,553 | (1,505 | )(2) | 11,010 | (4) | 5,999 | |||||||||||||||
Trade receivables
|
5,397 | 4,541 | 10,303 | (1) | 581 | (4) | 19,660 | |||||||||||||||
Notes receivable
|
1,754 | 796 | 494 | (1) | 171 | (4) | 2,873 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill amortization and amortization of
intangible assets
|
24,810 | 48,555 | | | 73,365 |
(1) | Represents balance assumed in connection with the Chicago Title merger on March 20, 2000. |
(2) | Represents allowances assumed and relieved from sales and acquisitions during the year. |
(3) | Represents payments of claim losses, net of recoupments. |
(4) | Represents uncollectible accounts written-off, change in reserve due to reevaluation of specific items and change in reserve due to sale of certain assets. |
(5) | Represents goodwill and intangible assets written-off. |
91
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
3.1 | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, incorporated by reference from Form S-4, Registration No. 333-103067 | |||
3.2 | Restated Bylaws of Registrant, incorporated by reference from Form S-4, Registration No. 333-103067 | |||
10.4 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1987 Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference from Form S-1, Registration No. 33-11321* | |||
10.4.1 | Amendments to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1987 Stock Option Plan approved by the stockholders of the Company on March 24, 1989, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 33-34300* | |||
10.5 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1987 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, incorporated by reference from Form S-1, Registration No. 33-11321* | |||
10.5.1 | Amendments to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1987 Employee Stock Purchase Plan approved by the stockholders of the Company on March 24, 1989, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 33-15027* | |||
10.5.2 | Amendments to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1987 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 33-45709* | |||
10.5.3 | Amendments to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1987 Employee Stock Purchase Plan approved by the stockholders of the Company on June 15, 1993, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 33-64836* | |||
10.5.4 | Amendments to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1987 Employee Stock Purchase Plan approved by the stockholders of the Company on June 20, 1995, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 33-61983* | |||
10.6 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Defined Contribution Plan and Trust adopted January 1, 1990, incorporated by reference from Form 10-K filed January 29, 1991* | |||
10.6.1 | Amendments to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 33-56514* | |||
10.6.2 | The Fidelity National Financial Group 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 333-83054* | |||
10.7 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1991 Stock Option Plan, approved by the stockholders of the Company on July 15, 1992, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 33-45272* | |||
10.7.1 | Amendments to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1991 Stock Option Plan approved by the stockholders of the Company on June 15, 1993, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 33-64834* | |||
10.7.2 | Amendment to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1991 Stock Plan, approved by the stockholders of the Company on June 14, 1994, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 33-83026* | |||
10.7.3 | Amendment to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1991 Stock Option Plan and the 1998 Stock Option Plan, approved by the stockholders of the Company on June 17, 1998, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 333-61111* | |||
10.8 | 1996 Omnibus Stock Option Plan (Granite), incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 333-48411* | |||
10.9 | Two Stock Option Agreements and Amended Stock Award Agreement (Alamo), incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 333-64229* |
92
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
10.35 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1993 Stock Plan, approved by stockholders of the Company on June 14, 1994, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 33-83026* | |||
10.60 | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 1, 1999, by and between Fidelity | |||
National Financial, Inc. and Chicago Title Corporation and amended as of October 13, 1999, incorporated by reference from Form S-4, Registration No. 333-89163 | ||||
10.61 | Credit Agreement, dated as of February 10, 2000, among Fidelity National Financial, Inc., as borrower, Bank of America, N.A., Chase Securities Inc., Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., and various Financial Institutions, as Lenders, incorporated by reference from Form 8-K, dated February 9, 2000 and filed February 15, 2000 | |||
10.61.1 | First amendment, dated as of March 20, 2001, to the Credit Agreement dated as of February 10, 2000, among Fidelity National Financial, Inc., as borrower, Bank of America, N.A., Chase Securities, Inc., Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., and Various Financial Institutions, as Lenders, included herein | |||
10.61.2 | Second amendment and waiver, dated as of July 12, 2001, to the Credit Agreement dated as of February 10, 2000, among Fidelity National Financial, Inc., as borrower, Bank of America, N.A., Chase Securities, Inc., Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., and Various Financial Institutions, as Lenders, included herein | |||
10.61.3 | Third amendment, dated as of February 26, 2003, to the Credit Agreement dated as of February 10, 2000, among Fidelity National Financial, Inc., as borrower, Bank of America, N.A., Chase Securities, Inc., Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., and Various Financial Institutions, as Lenders, included herein | |||
10.62 | Granite Financial, Inc. Omnibus Stock Plan of 1996, Amended and Restated as of April 24, 1997 and June 14, 1997, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 333-48111* | |||
10.63 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc., 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, approved by the stockholders of the Company on June 17, 1998, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 333-61111* | |||
10.64 | Chicago Title Corporation 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan and Chicago Title Corporation Directors Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 333-32806* | |||
10.65 | Amendment to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1991 Stock Option Plan, approved by the stockholders of the Company on June 12, 2000, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 333-52744* | |||
10.66 | Amendment to Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, approved by the stockholders of the Company on June 12, 2000, incorporated by reference from Form S-8, Registration No. 333-52744* | |||
10.67 | Underwriting Agreement, dated January 24, 2001, by and among Fidelity National Financial, Inc., and Merrill Lynch & Co., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Bear Stearns & Co., Inc., Lehman Brothers Inc. and U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc., as representatives of the underwriters named therein, incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2000 | |||
10.68 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference from Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2001* | |||
10.69 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Inventive Plan, incorporated by reference from Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2001* |
93
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
10.70 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as Amended and Restated as of April 24, 2001, incorporated by reference from Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2001* | |||
10.72 | Employment Agreement by and between Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and Patrick F. Stone as of March 22, 2000, incorporated by reference from Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2001* | |||
10.73 | Employment Agreement by and between Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and Alan L. Stinson as of March 22, 2001, incorporated by reference from Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2001* | |||
10.74 | Employment Agreement by and between Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and Peter T. Sadowski as of April 11, 2001, incorporated by reference from Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2001* | |||
10.75 | 7.30% Note due August 15, 2011 of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. in the principal amount of $250,000,000 dated August 20, 2001, incorporated by reference from Current Report on Form 8-K, dated August 23, 2001 | |||
10.76 | Underwriting Agreement by and among Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and Lehman Brothers Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC and Bear Stearns & Co., Inc. dated August 13, 2001, incorporated by reference from Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 23, 2001 | |||
10.77 | Indenture by and between Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and The Bank of New York dated as of August 20, 2001, incorporated by reference from Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 23, 2001 | |||
10.78 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2001* | |||
10.79 | Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as January 28, 2003, by and between Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and ALLTEL Corporation, incorporated by reference from Current Report on Form 8-K, dated January 29, 2003 | |||
10.80 | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 9, 2003, by and among Fidelity National Financial, Inc., ANFI, Inc. and ANFI Merger Sub, Inc., as amended by the First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 21, 2003, incorporated by reference from Form S-4/ A, Registration No. 333-103067 | |||
10.81 | Underwriting Agreement by and among Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Lehman Brothers, Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC and Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc., dated March 6, 2003, incorporated by reference from Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 6, 2003 | |||
10.82 | 5.25% Note due March 15, 2013 of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. in the principal amount of $250,000,000 dated March 11, 2003, incorporated by reference from Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 6, 2003 | |||
21 | List of Subsidiaries | |||
23 | Independent Auditors Consent | |||
99.1 | Certification by Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Financial Reports Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, included herein | |||
99.2 | Certification by Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Financial Reports Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, included herein |
* | A management or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this report pursuant to Item 15(c) of Form 10-K. |
94