COMPUTER MOTION INC - 10-Q Quarterly Report

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	Delaware		77-0458805

	(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
	incorporation or organization)		Identification Number)

Indicate by check /X/ whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve (12) months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety (90) days.

As of November 7, 2002 there were 17,456,405 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding.

INDEX			PAGE

PART I. - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Financial Statements
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations		3
		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets		4
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		5
		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		6
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		13
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		30
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		30
PART II. - OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Litigation		31
	Item 2.	Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds		32
	Item 4.	Submissions of Matters to Vote of Security Holders		33
	Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K		34
SIGNATURES				34

COMPUTER MOTION, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,

	2002				2001					2002			2001

Revenue		$	4,534			$	7,158			$	15,289			$	16,877
Cost of revenue			1,997				2,939				6,859				7,261

Gross profit			2,537				4,219				8,430				9,616

Gross profit %			56	%			59	%			55	%			57	%
Research & development expense			2,943				2,744				8,454				8,384
Selling, general & administrative expense			5,138				4,390				14,887				13,728

Total operating expense			8,081				7,134				23,341				22,112

Loss from operations			(5,544	)			(2,915	)			(14,911	)			(12,496	)
Interest income			8				11				51				87
Interest expense			(12	)			(28	)			(31	)			(78	)
Foreign currency translation gain/(loss)			32				1				3				87
Other expense			—				—				(8	)			(19	)

Total other income/(expense)			28				(16	)			15				77

Loss before income tax provision			(5,516	)			(2,931	)			(14,896	)			(12,419	)
Income tax provision			10				6				22				18

Net loss			(5,526	)			(2,937	)			(14,918	)			(12,437	)
Dividend to Series B preferred shareholders			—				307				4,978				3,001

Net loss available to common shareholders		$	(5,526	)		$	(3,244	)		$	(19,896	)		$	(15,438	)

Weighted average common shares outstanding used to compute net loss per share - basic and diluted			17,395				10,367				16,382				10,206

Net loss per share - basic and diluted		$	(0.32	)		$	(0.31	)		$	(1.21	)		$	(1.51	)

COMPUTER MOTION, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in thousands, except par value)

ASSETS	September 30, 2002 (unaudited)				December 31, 2001 (1)

Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	2,151			$	987
Restricted cash			173				80
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts and returns of $466 at September 30, 2002; and $1,184 at December 31, 2001			2,510				8,594
Inventories			7,022				5,853
Other current assets			872				811

Total current assets			12,728				16,325
Property and equipment:
Furniture and fixtures			1,896				2,020
Computer equipment			2,943				2,889
Machinery and equipment			5,911				5,381
Accumulated depreciation			(6,869	)			(5,492	)

Property and equipment, net			3,881				4,798
Other assets			57				63

Total assets		$	16,666			$	21,186

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Note payable to shareholder		$	1,000			$	900
Accounts payable			4,855				6,497
Accrued expenses			4,361				4,551
Deferred revenue			2,568				3,628

Total current liabilities			12,784				15,576
Deferred revenue			1,404				1,711
Other liabilities			11				37

Total liabilities			14,199				17,324

Shareholders’ equity:
Mandatorily redeemable Series B convertible preferred stock, $.001 par value, authorized 5,000 shares, outstanding at 9/30/02-None; 12/31/01- 8.5 shares			—				8,674
Common stock, $.001 par value, authorized - 50,000 shares; Outstanding 09/30/02 - 17,420 shares; 12/31/01- 11,439 shares			18				11
Additional paid-in capital			107,309				80,343
Deferred compensation			(287	)			(326	)
Accumulated deficit			(104,491	)			(84,594	)
Other comprehensive loss			(82	)			(246	)

Total shareholders’ equity			2,467				3,862

Total liabilities & shareholders’ equity		$	16,666			$	21,186

COMPUTER MOTION INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,

	2002				2001

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net Loss		$	(14,918	)		$	(12,437	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization			1,502				1,243
Provision for doubtful accounts and sales allowances			—				250
Common stock issued for services			1,395				—
Stock options issued for services			631				—
Amortization of deferred compensation			39				128
Other			1				(22	)
Decrease (Increase) in:
Accounts receivable			6,084				4,688
Inventories			(1,169	)			(2,432	)
Other current assets			(61	)			(469	)
Increase (Decrease) in:
Accounts payable			(1,642	)			821
Accrued expenses			(190	)			53
Other liabilities			(26	)			—
Deferred revenue			(1,367	)			790

Net cash used in operating activities			(9,721	)			(7,387	)
Cash flows from Investing Activities:
Purchase of property and equipment			(581	)			(1,425	)
Increase in restricted deposits			—				(80	)

Net cash used in investing activities			(581	)			(1,505	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Repayment of note payable to shareholder			(900	)			(3,000	)
Proceeds from note payable to shareholder			1,000				900
Proceeds from preferred stock issuance			—				9,610
Proceeds from common stock issued and warrants exercised, net of repurchases			10,494				2,020
Proceeds from common stock - Societe Generale (Equity Line)			508				—
Proceeds from common stock - ESPP plan			61				—
Proceeds from exercise of stock options			232				—
Comprehensive loss and other			164				13

Net cash provided by financing activities			11,559				9,543

Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash			1,257				651
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period			1,067				1,551

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period		$	2,324			$	2,202

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Computer Motion, Inc. (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the financial information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

The operating results of the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the entire fiscal year ending December 31, 2002 or for any other interim period. The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on April 1, 2002. As shown in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company continues to incur losses and negative cash flows from operations. At September 30, 2002, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $2.3 million. Management believes that its current cash and proceeds from the recent private placement of preferred stock, which closed on October 31, 2002, will allow the Company to continue its operations, fund working capital and capital expenditures through September 30, 2003. The Company’s need for additional financing will depend upon numerous factors, including, but not limited to, net cash used in operating activities, including the progress and scope of ongoing research and development projects, the costs of training physicians to become proficient in the use of the Company’s products and procedures, the ability to obtain additional FDA approvals, the ability to successfully defend itself in any current or future patent litigation and the ability of the Company’s customers to obtain medical reimbursement from third party payors.

The Company applies the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (SAB 101) when recognizing revenue. SAB 101 states that revenue generally is realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: a) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, b) delivery has occurred or the services have been rendered, c) the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and d) collectibility is reasonably assured.

The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of products, including supplies and accessories, to end-users once shipment has occurred (as the Company’s general terms are FOB shipping point). In those few cases where the terms are FOB customer’s plant, revenue is not recognized until the Company receives a signed delivery and acceptance certificate, and all of the conditions of SAB 101 (items a. through d., as identified above) have been met. Revenue is recognized from the performance of services as the services are performed.

The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of products, including supplies and accessories, to distributors once shipment has occurred (as the Company’s general terms are FOB shipping point), and all of the conditions of SAB 101 have been met. The Company’s distributors do not have rights of return or cancellation. Revenues from distributors that do not meet all of the requirements of SAB 101 are deferred and recognized upon the sale of the product to the end-user.

Revenues for transactions that include multiple elements such as systems, training, product warranties, instruments, accessory kits and service contracts are allocated to each element based on its relative fair value (or in the absence of fair value, the residual method) and recognized when the revenue recognition criteria have been met for each element. The Company recognizes revenue for delivered elements only when the following criteria are satisfied: (1) undelivered elements are not essential to the functionality of delivered elements, (2) uncertainties regarding customer acceptance are resolved and (3) the fair value for all undelivered elements is known.

The Company believes that Statement of Position 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition” (SOP 97-2), is not applicable to the sale of the Company’s products in accordance with the guidance in paragraphs 2 and 4 of SOP 97-2. The Company considers the software that it sells incidental to its products sold. In addition, such software is not a significant focus of the Company’s marketing efforts nor is the software sold separately. Also, post contract customer support is not sold by the Company in conjunction with the software. As a result, the Company does not separately account for the sale of the software.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 128, “Earnings Per Share,” requires that the Company present both basic and diluted net loss per share in its financial statements. The Company’s basic net loss per share is the same as its diluted net loss per share because inclusion of outstanding stock options and warrants in the calculation is antidilutive. Basic and diluted loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period.

The net loss per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 has been adjusted to include the present value of the dividends paid on the shares of the Company’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of $1,193,000 and the write off of the beneficial conversion feature of such shares of $3,785,000. The Company is required to recognize these items as a dividend in the net loss computation for loss per share (See Note 4 as all of the remaining shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock were converted into shares of common stock on February 13, 2002).

	(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
	(unaudited)
	For the three months ended												For the nine months ended
	September 30,												September 30,

	2002						2001						2002						2001

	Amount			Per share			Amount			Per share			Amount			Per share			Amount			Per Share

Unaudited per share data - basic and diluted:
Net Loss and net loss per share--(Unaudited)	$	(5,526	)	$	(0.32	)	$	(2,937	)	$	(0.28	)	$	(14,918	)	$	(0.91	)	$	(12,437	)	$	(1.22	)
Fair Value of warrants issued in connection with the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock		—			—			—			—			—			—			(1,536	)	$	(0.15	)
Cumulative dividend on the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock		—			—			(61	)		(0.01	)		—			—			(153	)	$	(0.02	)
Additional shares issued due to a reset provision of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock		—			—			(246	)		(0.02	)		—			—			(246	)	$	(0.02	)
Present Value of dividend on the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock		—			—			—			—			(1,193	)		(0.07	)		—			—
Beneficial Conversion feature of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock		—			—			—			—			(3,785	)		(0.23	)		(1,066	)	$	(0.10	)

Net loss available to common shareholders and net loss per share	$	(5,526	)	$	(0.32	)	$	(3,244	)		(0.31	)	$	(19,896	)	$	(1.21	)	$	(15,438	)	$	(1.51	)

	(Amounts in thousands)

	(unaudited)

	September 30, 2002		December 31, 2001

Raw materials	$	3,251	$	3,200
Work in process		892		470
Finished goods		2,879		2,183

Total inventories	$	7,022	$	5,853

Note 4. Private Placement of Common Stock and Conversion of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock

On February 13, 2002, the Company raised net proceeds of approximately $10,527,000 through the sale and issuance of shares of its common stock to certain institutional and accredited investors, including approximately $100,000 from Robert W. Duggan, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman. The proceeds from the sale of the Company’s common stock were used to retire approximately $2,360,000 in debt (including the remaining principal and accrued interest of $968,000 under a promissory note payable to Mr. Duggan) and the remainder of the proceeds were used to fund working capital needs due to investments in clinical trials, research and development, sales and marketing programs and for other general operating requirements. In February 2002, the Company issued 328,689 additional shares of its common stock to certain vendors who agreed to cancel approximately $1,395,000 of accounts payable owed to these vendors as consideration for their shares.

On February 13, 2002, the holders of the Company’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock entered into agreements with the Company whereby they agreed to convert all of their remaining shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock into shares of common stock. The Company issued 2,196,341 shares of its common stock upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. In connection with this conversion, the Company agreed to pay to the holders the present value of the future dividends payable on their shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. This dividend payment was made by the issuance of 312,869 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company also agreed to reduce the exercise price of certain warrants issued to the holders of its Series B Convertible Preferred Stock from $8.12 to $5.00 per share.

In January 2002, the Company entered into a secured, revolving line of credit (or factoring agreement) with a third party financing company. This line of credit provided for borrowings up to $2,000,000 based on eligible domestic trade receivables at a factoring fee of 2%, plus a financing fee of prime rate plus 3% and was secured by all the assets of the Company. The six-month term of this revolving line of credit expired in July 2002 and was not renewed. As of September 30, 2002, no amounts were outstanding under the accounts receivable financing agreement.

On March 30, 2001, the Company entered into an Equity Line Financing Agreement with Société Générale, under which the Company was entitled to issue and sell, from time to time, shares of its common stock for cash consideration up to an aggregate of $12 million. In February 2002, the Company terminated the Equity Line Financing Agreement. In connection with this termination, the Company paid a one-time settlement fee of $135,000 to Société Générale. Prior to terminating the Equity Line Financing Agreement, the Company raised approximately $508,000 by issuing 111,615 shares of its common stock to Société Générale pursuant to the terms of the Equity Line Financing Agreement.

$1,000,000 to Robert W. Duggan and the other bridge lender. The notes then were converted into shares of Series C Preferred Stock issued in the Company’s recent private placement, except that the conversion of Mr. Duggan’s note is subject to stockholder approval. Interest accrues at 8.5% per annum on the promissory notes and is convertible into shares of the Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, subject to stockholder approval at a special meeting to be held early next year (See Note 12 – “Subsequent Event”).

The Company adopted SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.” SFAS 131 establishes standards for reporting information regarding operating segments in annual financial statements and requires selected information for those segments to be presented in interim financial reports issued to stockholders. SFAS 131 also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services and geographic areas. Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in making decisions how to allocate resources and assess performance. The Company’s chief decision-making group, as defined under SFAS 131, is the Executive Staff, which is comprised of the President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technology Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer. To date, the Executive Staff has viewed the Company’s operations as principally one segment (For consistent presentation certain amounts have been reclassified in prior periods in order to conform to the current year presentation): proprietary robotic and computerized surgical systems for the medical device industry. Sales by product lines within this segment are as follows:

Revenue by product line for the three months ended
(Amounts in thousands)
	Sep. 30, 2002		Jun. 30, 2002		Sep. 30, 2001

ZEUS surgical systems	$	601	$	983	$	2,631
AESOP surgical systems		1,455		1,860		2,414
SOCRATES telementoring systems		96		408		305
HERMES (systems, development, and supplies)		1,230		685		903
Grant revenue		132		101		—
Development revenue		—		—		268
Recurring revenue		1,020		1,027		637

	$	4,534	$	5,064	$	7,158

Units sold by product line for the three months ended
	Sep. 30, 2002		Jun. 30, 2002		Sep. 30, 2001

ZEUS surgical systems		1		1		4
ZEUS surgical systems upgrades		2		3		3
AESOP surgical systems		22		26		34
SOCRATES telementoring systems		1		5		4

Export sales are made by the United States operations to the following geographic locations:

For the three months ended (Amounts in thousands)
	Sep. 30, 2002		Jun. 30, 2002		Sep. 30, 2001

Canada	$	571	$	766	$	—
Europe and the Middle East		492		756		3,240
Asia		275		743		367
South America & Mexico		7		320		172

	$	1,345	$	2,585	$	3,779

On May 10, 2000, the Company filed a lawsuit in United States District Court alleging that Intuitive Surgical’s da Vinci surgical robot system infringes on its United States Patent Nos. 5,524,180, 5,878,193, 5,762,458, 6,001,108, 5,815,640, 5,907,664, 5,855,583 and 6,063,095. Subsequently, Computer Motion’s complaint was amended to add allegations that Intuitive’s da Vinci surgical robot infringed two additional Computer Motion patents United States Patent Nos. 6,244,809 and 6,102,850. These patents concern methods and devices for conducting various aspects of robotic surgery. Intuitive has served an Answer and Counterclaim alleging non-infringement of each patent-in-suit, patent invalidity and unenforceability. Discovery is still underway. The parties have filed cross motions for summary judgment on the issue of patent infringement relating to the ’108, ’664, ’809, and ’850 patents which have not been ruled upon by the Court at the present time. Trial is set for April 2003.

On or about December 7 and 8, 2000, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) granted three of Intuitive’s petitions for a declaration of an interference relating to the Company’s 5,878,193, 5,907,664, and 5,855,583 patents. On March 30, 2002, the three judge panel of the Board of Patent Interferences issued decision orders on the parties’ preliminary motions. The Board granted the Company’s motion on Interference No. 104,643 and issued an order for Intuitive to show cause why judgment should not be entered against Intuitive on this interference. The Board denied the Company’s motion on the Interference No. 104,644 and entered judgment against the Company. The Board denied the Company’s motions on the Interference No. 104,645, deferred decision on two of Intuitive’s motions, and granted-in-part, denied-in-part and deferred-in-part on one of Intuitive’s motions. The Board’s decision on Interference No. 104,645 invalidated some of the parties’ claims, affirmed some of Intuitive’s claims and provided for further proceedings related to two of our claims and is therefore not final. On July 25, 2002, Computer Motion filed a civil action seeking review of the two adverse decisions in the United States District Court for the District of California.

On February 21, 2001, Brookhill-Wilk filed suit against the Company alleging that its ZEUS surgical system infringed upon Brookhill-Wilk’s United States Patent Nos. 5,217,003 and 5,368,015. Brookhill-Wilk’s complaint sought damages, attorneys’ fees and increased damages alleging willful patent infringement. On March 21, 2001, the Company served its Answer and Counterclaim alleging non-infringement of each patent-in-suit, patent invalidity and unenforceability. On November 8, 2001, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the co-pending Brookhill-Wilk v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Civil Action No. 00-CV-6599 (NRB), issued an order interpreting the claims of Brookhill-Wilk’s Patent No. 5,217,003 in a way that the Company believed excluded current applications of its ZEUS surgical system. In light of this decision, on November 13, 2001, the parties to Brookhill Wilk v. Computer Motion, Inc. agreed to dismiss the case without prejudice.

On March 30, 2001, Intuitive and IBM Corporation filed suit alleging that the Company’s AESOP, ZEUS and HERMES products infringe United States Patent No. 6,201,984 which was issued on March 13, 2001. The complaint seeks damages, a permanent injunction, and costs and attorneys’ fees. Each of the asserted claims is limited to a surgical system employing voice recognition for control of a surgical instrument and literally read on Computer Motion’s current AESOP product and Computer Motion’s ZEUS and HERMES products to the extent they are used with AESOP. A jury trial has been held on the issues of patent invalidity due to lack of enablement and failure to disclose the best mode in addition to damages. The Company’s defense of unenforceability due to prosecution laches was tried before the District Court Judge. The jury returned a verdict finding IBM’s United States Patent No. 6,201,984 valid, and finding Intuitive was damaged in an amount of $4.4 million. Prior to the jury’s verdict, the court ruled that the Company had not “willfully” infringed the patent. The court has not, at this time, given its verdict on the Company’s prosecution laches defense. A verdict in the Company’s favor on the prosecution laches defense could result in a finding that the patent is not enforceable and negate the damages verdict.

On September 20, 2002, a lawsuit was filed against the Company by Endoscopic Technologies, Inc., alleging breach of contract and related claims arising out of an agreement entered into between the two companies pursuant to which Endoscopic purchased equipment from the Company and was to become a distributor for the Company’s products. The lawsuit, which is currently pending in the Superior Court of California for the City and County of San Francisco, was recently served on the Company and no answer has been filed. The Company contends that the action is without merit and plans to vigorously defend this action. In addition, the Company will likely be filing a cross-complaint against Endoscopic seeking payment of more than $100,000 in outstanding invoices.

In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” (SFAS 144). SFAS 144 supersedes FASB Statement No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of” and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, “Reporting the Results of Operations — Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions,”, for the disposal of a segment of a business (as previously defined in that Opinion). SFAS No. 144 also resolves significant implementation issues related to Statement 121.

The FASB recently approved two pronouncements: SFAS No 141, “Business Combinations” and SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” which provide guidance on the accounting for business combinations to be accounted for using the purchase method. Under the new rules, goodwill will no longer be subject to amortization over its useful life. Rather, goodwill will be subject to at least an annual impairment assessment. This assessment is a fundamentally different two-step approach and is based on a comparison between a reporting unit’s fair value and its carrying value. Intangible assets have newly defined criteria and will be accounted for separately from goodwill and will continue to be amortized over their useful lives.

including members of management. This offering will result in net cash to the Company of approximately $11,500,000. To date, the Company has received approximately $9,000,000 (including $1,000,000 of proceeds from a note payable to stockholder, see Note 7) and expects to receive $1,500,000 from one investor on or about November 15, 2002, and an additional $1,000,000 from Robert W. Duggan, (or his affiliates or designees), Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, upon the stockholder’s approval of this equity offering at a special meeting to be held early next year. Concurrently with the private placement, the Company issued warrants for the purchase of up to 3,518,690 shares of the Company’s common stock.

The Series C-1 Convertible Preferred Stock and the Series C-2 Convertible Preferred stock (the “Preferred Stock”) have identical rights, preferences and privileges except with respect to the manner in which the Company may pay accrued dividends as described below. The Preferred Stock is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial conversion price of $1.40 per share. The holders of Preferred Stock shall receive a preferred annual dividend at a rate of 12.0% per annum, decreasing to 8.0% upon stockholder approval of the transaction and increasing to 12.0% on the second anniversary of the initial issuance date. Dividends on the Series C-1 Convertible Preferred Stock may be paid by the Company, at its option, through the issuance of shares of common stock or cash, and dividends on the Series C-2 Convertible Preferred Stock may only be paid in cash. In addition, the investors were granted two series (Series C-1 and C-2 Warrants) of 5-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of approximately 3,518,690 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Series C-1 Warrants to purchase 1,759,345 shares of common stock are exercisable at a price of $1.80 per share and the Series C-2 Warrants to purchase 1,759,345 shares of common stock are exercisable at a price of $2.20 per share. The Series C-1 Warrants are redeemable if the Company’s common stock trades at or above $3.00 per share for ten consecutive trading days and the Series C-2 Warrants are redeemable if the Company’ common stock trades at or above $4.40 per share for ten consecutive trading days. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and National Association of Stock Dealers and Automated Quotation (NASDAQ) rules require shareholder approval for private financing in excess of 20% of the total shares outstanding. The Company will be seeking stockholder approval for the conversion of the Preferred Stock in an amount that exceeds 19.99% of the total outstanding common stock on the date of issuance at a special stockholders meeting to be held early next year. Please see the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed on November 4, 2002, for a description of the terms.

This report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The Company’s actual results may differ materially due to factors that include, but are not limited to, the risks discussed herein under “Risk Factors That May Affect Future Results” as well as those discussed in the “Risk Factors That May Affect Future Results” section of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

Computer Motion is a high-tech medical device and training company developing surgical practices with the goal of ushering in a new era of patient and physician friendly surgery. This new era is expected to significantly reduce patient trauma, recovery time and dramatically reduce the learning curve of surgeons adapting these new, less invasive techniques. The Company’s products automate operating room tasks and simplify various aspects of surgical procedures, reducing operating cost and time. Computer Motion’s products, including surgeon training and education services, play a significant role in transitioning the surgical community from open procedures to less invasive procedures increasingly demanded by patients. As the leader in computer-enhanced surgical systems for minimally invasive procedures, Computer Motion holds 27

patents, with over 50 additional patents pending. Computer Motion’s products have been successfully used across a broad range of surgical disciplines including cardiac, urology, pediatrics, bariatrics and general surgery.

The Company develops and markets robotic and computerized surgical systems that are upgradeable and based on an open system platform, which allows for networking of the entire operating room. These systems enhance a surgeon’s performance and centralize and simplify a surgeon’s control of the operating room. Computer Motion’s products provide surgeons with the natural functionality necessary to perform complex, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) procedures, as well as enable surgeons to control critical devices in the operating room through simple verbal commands. The Company believes its products will broaden the scope and increase the effectiveness of MIS, improve patient outcomes, and create a safer, more efficient and cost-effective operating room.

The ZEUS Surgical System is designed to fundamentally improve a surgeon’s ability to perform complex MIS procedures. The Company expects to enable new MIS procedures involving a range of surgical disciplines, including fully endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafts or E-CABG™ grafts on a beating heart. ZEUS augments surgeon performance by providing 3-D visualization of the operating area, filtering out hand tremor and scaling human motion. A recent addition to ZEUS is the new MicroWrist surgeon interface, which has a natural feel similar to an open procedure to improve dexterity and reduce the learning curve in using the system.

ZEUS system’s three compact, portable arms hold and position reusable microsurgical instruments and an endoscope. Each arm is individually mounted on the operating room table using the standard table rails. Because the arms are attached to the table, the table can be adjusted during a surgical procedure without removing the instruments. The surgeon sits near the operating room table at an open, comfortable and portable console. The open design of the console provides the surgeon with an unobstructed view of the patient and allows clear communication with the operating room staff. At the console, the surgeon controls the instrument handles and views the operative site on a video monitor. ZEUS senses the surgeon’s hand movements through the new MicroWrist surgeon interface. It then scales the surgeon’s hand movements into precise, tremor-free micro movements at the operative site.

AESOP, the first of Computer Motion’s revolutionary line of robotic surgical devices, enables endoscopic visualization with stability and clarity. It was FDA cleared in 1993. AESOP is an integral part of the ZEUS system. AESOP is a voice-controlled robotic arm (one of the three arms in ZEUS) that positions and holds an endoscope with steadiness and precision during MIS procedures. It mimics the human arm in form, function and expanded range of motion. AESOP’s voice-activation system, created specifically for the operating room, recognizes only the surgeon’s authorized commands. Powered by the HERMES Control Center, AESOP can also be networked with a wide variety of other voice-controlled surgical and operating room devices. The Company believes that AESOP is the world’s first FDA-cleared robot and first voice controlled interface for a surgical device. The Company has sold over 700 AESOP units worldwide, which the Company believes have been used to perform over 175,000 procedures.

The HERMES Control Center is designed to integrate all the devices in the operating room and provide the surgeon and the operating room staff with a consistent and unified interface to control all devices. The primary input for the surgeon using the Hermes Control Center is through the use of simple speech commands. The HERMES system was designed as an open architecture platform simplifying the process for medical device manufacturers to create HERMES-ready devices. The HERMES Control Center is a platform to provide surgeons and operating room staff with quicker access to information and increased control over their environment. Today’s offices include computers that are networked to printers, fax machines, modems, scanners and other enabling tools. Similarly, HERMES allows the operating room to be networked with OR-specific equipment, such as tables, lights, cameras and surgical equipment. These HERMES-Ready devices can be controlled by surgeon voice commands or by way of a hand-held touch-screen pendant.

The 27 FDA-cleared devices controlled by the HERMES system include endoscopic cameras, overhead cameras, light sources, insufflators, arthroscopic shavers, fluid pumps, VCRs, printers, video frame grabbers, digital image capture devices, OR lights, surgical tables, electrosurgical units, telephones and the Company’s port expander, and the AESOP and ZEUS systems. The HERMES compatible, or HERMES -Ready™ interfaces for these devices were created in collaboration with various HERMES alliance partners, including Stryker Endoscopy, Berchtold, Steris, Valley Lab (TYCO), and Smith & Nephew Endoscopy.

SOCRATES links surgeons in the operating room with colleagues anywhere in the world. It is the first and only device in a newly created FDA category of Robotic Telemedicine Devices. It promotes peer-to-peer and mentor-trainee collaboration and makes it possible for specially trained surgeons to become interactively telepresent wherever and whenever needed. SOCRATES creates surgical telepresence through the remote surgeon’s graphical annotation of the operating field and shared control of the endoscope, as well as through two-way video and audio communication. The Company believes that by facilitating truly interactive dialogue between geographically separated colleagues, SOCRATES provides the foundation for a new era of surgical teamwork and training.

The Company has sustained significant losses since inception and, as of September 30, 2002, has an accumulated deficit of $104,491,000. The Company expects to incur additional losses as it continues to fund research and development efforts, clinical trials, and seeks to expand its manufacturing capacity and sales force. As a result, the Company will need to generate significant revenues in order to achieve and maintain profitability. The Company is not certain that it will ever achieve significant commercial revenues, particularly from sales of its ZEUS product line, which is still under development and awaiting additional FDA clearances for certain applications and procedures, or that the Company will ever become profitable. It is possible that the Company may encounter substantial delays or incur unexpected expenses related to, among other things, additional clinical trials, market introduction and acceptance of the ZEUS platform or any future products and litigation required to protect its intellectual property portfolio. If the time required to generate significant revenues and achieve profitability is longer than anticipated, the Company may not be able to continue its operations.

The Company is penetrating only a small fraction of the total potential market for its products. Although many medical conditions that are treatable using the Company’s products are also treatable using pharmaceuticals and other medical devices, the Company does not believe that it encounters direct competition for its AESOP, HERMES or SOCRATES products. The Company believes that it has only one direct competitor for its ZEUS product. Its AESOP, HERMES, SOCRATES and ZEUS products are comprised of relatively new technologies, and the current customer profiles are made up of healthcare organizations that share the Company’s pioneering vision for these new technologies. Thus, the Company does not believe that there is any statistical significance to its quarterly increase or decrease variations in business levels. However,

the Company believes that its products’ acceptance and adoption will be positively influenced by the recent FDA clearance for sale in general laparoscopic surgery for the Company’s ZEUS product. The challenges the Company faces in its attempt to increase market share today include market acceptance, regulatory clearance, surgical procedure adoption (such as Endoscopic Atraumatic Coronary Artery Bypass or Endo-ACAB surgery) and adoption of robotic technologies In addition, the Company believes that the sales cycle for capital medical equipment is approximately three to six months, especially for innovative technologies like the Company’s AESOP, HERMES, SOCRATES and ZEUS products. Thus, sales in the first quarter originate in the fourth quarter of the prior year. The Company also believes that prospecting for new sales tends to fall off in the fourth quarter since its sales focus is on closing sales for the current calendar year and because there are fewer working days available due to the holiday season.

Three months ended September 30, 2002 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2001.

Revenue. Revenue decreased $2,624,000, or 37%, to $4,534,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 from $7,158,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2001. ZEUS revenue of $601,000 for the quarter decreased $2,030,000 over last year’s second quarter of $2,631,000 due to a decrease in the number of units shipped which we believe was, in part, due to the delay in the Company’s receipt of FDA approval. AESOP revenue of $1,455,000 for the quarter decreased $959,000 over last year’s second quarter of $2,414,000 due to fewer systems being shipped. HERMES revenue of $1,230,000 for the quarter increased $327,000 over last year’s second quarter of $903,000 due to an increase in the number of units shipped as well as an increase in supplies and accessories sales. SOCRATES revenue of $96,000 for the quarter decreased $209,000 over last year’s second quarter of $305,000 due to fewer units being shipped. Grant revenue of $132,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 resulted from a 3-year NIST grant the Company received in the fourth quarter of 2001. Development revenue of $268,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2001 was attributable to the Lindberg Telesurgery project, which was a onetime event. Recurring revenues of $1,020,000 for the quarter increased $383,000 over last year’s third quarter of $637,000 as the installed base of robotic systems increased, leading to more sales of parts, accessories, supplies and service.

carryforwards of approximately $64,808,000 and $9,527,000, respectively, that are available to offset future federal and state taxable income. Federal carryforwards expire between fifteen and twenty years after the year of loss and state carryforwards expire between five and seven years after the year of loss. The Company has provided a full valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset because of the uncertainty regarding its realization.

Net Loss. The net loss for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 was $5,526,000, or $.32 per share (before dividend to preferred stockholders), compared to $2,937,000 or $.28 per share (before dividend to preferred stockholders), for the quarter ended September 30, 2001 as decreased revenue resulted in an increase in the Company’s net loss. The fully diluted loss per share for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 was $.32, compared to $.31 for the quarter ended September 30, 2001. Weighted average shares increased from 10,367,000 to 17,395,000 primarily due to the issuance of shares in February 2002, related to the conversion of all outstanding shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and a private placement of the Company’s common stock.

Nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2001.

Revenue. Revenue decreased $1,588,000, or 9%, to $15,289,000, for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $16,877,000 for the same period in 2001. For the nine months ended September 30, 2002, SOCRATES revenue increased $376,000, or 84%, HERMES revenue increased $405,000, or 32%, and recurring revenue increased $940,000, or 27%, over the same period in 2001. ZEUS and AESOP revenue decreased $1,517,000, or 28%, and $1,488,000, or 26%, respectively, over the same period in 2001. Development revenue decreased $268,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to the same period in 2001. The development revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 was attributable to the Lindberg Telesurgery project, which was a onetime event.

Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expense increased $1,159,000, or 8%, to $14,887,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $13,728,000 for the same period in 2001. This increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily the result of increased legal fees related to the Company’s patent litigation lawsuit. Additionally, marketing expenses increased as the Company participated in additional trade shows.

Income Taxes. Minimal provisions for state franchise taxes have been recorded on the Company’s pre-tax losses to date. As of December 31, 2001, the Company had federal and state net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of approximately $64,808,000 and $9,527,000, respectively that are available to offset future federal and state taxable income. Federal carryforwards expire between fifteen and twenty years after the year of loss and state carryforwards expire between five and seven years after the year of loss. The Company has

provided a full valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset because of the uncertainty regarding its realization.

Net Loss. The net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 was $14,918,000, or $.91 per share (before dividend to preferred stockholders), compared to $12,437,000, or $1.22 per share (before dividend to preferred stockholders), for the same period in 2001 as decreased revenue combined with an increase in operating expenses resulted in an increase in the Company’s net loss. The fully diluted loss per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 was $1.21, compared to $1.51 for the same period in 2001. Weighted average shares increased from 10,206,000 to 16,382,000 primarily due to the issuance of shares in February 2002 in connection with the conversion of all outstanding shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and a private placement of the Company’s common stock

Three months ended September 30, 2002 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2002.

Revenue. Revenue decreased $530,000, or 10%, to $4,534,000, for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 from $5,064,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2002. HERMES revenue of $1,230,000 for the quarter increased $545,000, or 77%, over the prior quarter of $685,000 as shipments to the Company’s OEM partners increased. ZEUS, AESOP, and SOCRATES revenues decreased $382,000, $405,000 and $312,000 respectively, over the prior quarter due to a reduction in the number of units shipped. Recurring revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 of $1,020,000 was comparable to the prior quarter of $1,027,000.

Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expense increased $205,000, or 4%, to $5,138,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 from $4,933,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2002. The increase was due primarily to an increase in legal expenses related to the patent infringement lawsuit the Company has filed against a competitor and certain claims filed against the Company also related to patent infringement.

Net Loss. The net loss for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 was $5,526,000, or $.32 per share (before dividend to preferred shareholder), compared to $4,934,000, or $.29 per share (before dividend to preferred shareholder), for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, as decreased revenue combined with increased operating expenses resulted in a greater net loss. The fully diluted loss per share for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 was $.32, compared to $.29 for the quarter ended June 30, 2002. Weighted average shares increased from 17,260,000 at June 30, 2002 to 17,395,000 at September 30, 2002, due primarily to the issuance of shares under the Company’s employee stock purchase plan as well as stock being issued for compensation.

The Company’s operations to date have consumed substantial amounts of cash, and the Company expects its capital and total costs and expenditures (including cost of revenue) to exceed cash receipts from revenue for at least the next 6 months. In February 2002, the Company raised net proceeds of approximately $10,527,000 through the sale and issuance of shares of common stock to certain institutional and accredited investors, including Robert W. Duggan, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman. An additional $1,395,000 of accounts payable owed to certain vendors was cancelled in exchange for 328,689 shares of the Company common stock. The proceeds from the sale of the Company’s common stock were used to retire approximately $2,360,000 in debt (including the remaining principal and accrued interest of $968,000 under a promissory note payable to Mr. Duggan) and the remainder of the proceeds was used to fund working capital needs due to investments in clinical trials, research and development, sales and marketing programs and for other general operating requirements. In addition, in February 2002, the Company paid a one time dividend in common stock valued at $1,193,000 to the holders of its Series B Convertible Preferred Stock who converted such shares into common stock on or prior to February 13, 2002.

On October 31, 2002, the Company raised net proceeds of approximately $11,500,000 through the sale and issuance of preferred stock to certain institutional and accredited investors. This amount includes $1,000,000 of Preferred Shares to be purchased upon conversion of a promissory note issued to Robert W. Duggan, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, as well as an additional $1,000,000 of Preferred Shares to be purchased by Robert W. Duggan (or his affiliates of designees). Both are subject to stockholder approval. The proceeds from the sale of the Company’s preferred stock will be used to fund working capital needs and for other general operating requirements, including sales and marketing programs.

The Company believes that it will be able to fund its operations for at least twelve months with its current cash and proceeds received from the preferred stock offering which closed on October 31, 2002. However, the Company may require additional working capital to fund its operations after September 30, 2003, and will need to raise additional capital. It is anticipated that additional funding, as needed, to support operations through and after September 30, 2003 will be obtained from the following sources: current cash balances and the issuance of additional debt and equity securities. The Company cannot be certain that

additional capital will be available on terms favorable to it, or at all. The various elements of the Company’s business and growth strategies, including its introduction of new products, the expansion of its marketing and distribution activities and its efforts to obtain regulatory approval or market acceptance, will require additional capital. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, the Company’s ability to fund those business activities essential to its ability to operate profitably, including further research and development, clinical trials, and sales and marketing activities, would be significantly limited.

The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires that management make certain estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances that affect amounts reported in the accompanying financial statements and related footnotes. In preparing these financial statements, management has made its best estimates and judgments of certain amounts included in the financial statements, giving consideration to materiality. The Company does not believe there is a great likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported related to the accounting policies described below. However, application of these accounting policies involves exercise of judgment and use of assumptions as to future uncertainties; as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates.

In accordance with recent Securities and Exchange Commission guidance, those material accounting policies that the Company believes are the most critical to an investor’s understanding of the financial results and condition and require complex management judgment have been expanded and are discussed below. Information regarding other accounting policies is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

Revenue Recognition. In certain cases, revenue from direct system sales is generated from multiple components, which require judgments regarding delivery, customer acceptance, installation and collectibility. Revenue is recognized as specific elements indicated in sales contracts are executed. If an element is essential to the functionality of the system, revenue is deferred until that essential element is delivered. The fair value of each undelivered element that is not essential to the functionality of the system is deferred until performance occurs. The fair value of an undelivered element is based upon an estimate made by management. Amounts billed in excess of revenue recognized are recorded as deferred revenue on the balance sheet.

Warranties. The Company provides for the estimated costs of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. The Company’s estimate of costs to service its warranty obligations is based upon historical experience and expectation of future conditions. Should warranty claim activity and the costs associated with servicing those claims differ from the Company’s estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability may be required.

these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of reserves required, if any, for these contingencies is made after careful analysis of each individual issue. The required reserves may change in the future due to new developments in each matter or changes in approach such as a change in settlement strategy in dealing with these matters.

The Company has a history of losses, and expects to incur losses in the future so the Company may never achieve profitability.

The Company has incurred significant losses since its formation. For the three years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, the Company has incurred net losses of $16,413,000, $16,349,000 and $13,375,000, respectively. In addition, the Company has incurred net losses from operations since inception and as of September 30, 2002 has an accumulated deficit of $104,491,000. The Company expects to incur additional losses as it continues to spend for research and development efforts, clinical trials, manufacturing capacity and sales force expansion. As a result, the Company will need to generate significant revenues to achieve and maintain profitability. The Company cannot assure its stockholders that it will ever achieve significant commercial revenues, particularly from sales of its ZEUS product line, which is still under development and awaiting additional FDA clearances for certain significant applications and procedures, or that the Company will become profitable. It is possible that the Company may encounter substantial delays or incur unexpected expenses related to the clinical trials, market introduction and acceptance of the ZEUS platform, or any future products. If the time required to generate significant revenues and achieve profitability is longer than anticipated, the Company may not be able to continue its operations.

Since the Company’s capital and total costs and expenditures (including cost of revenue) currently exceed its revenue, any failure to raise additional capital or generate required working capital could affect the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Management is in the process of pursuing financing arrangements in order to meet the Company’s cash flow needs and fund its operations beyond September 30, 2003. There are no assurances that Management will be able to successfully complete any such financing arrangement or that the amount raised will meet the Company’s cash flow needs. The failure of the Company to achieve either of these items could affect the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and may have a material impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations. Further, while the Company has eleven years of uninterrupted growth there is no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully grow its business.

Since the Company’s operating expenditures currently exceed its revenue, any failure to raise additional capital or generate required working capital could reduce the Company’s ability to compete and prevent it from taking advantage of market opportunities.

The Company’s operations to date have consumed substantial amounts of cash, and it expects its capital and total costs and expenditures (including cost of revenue) to exceed cash receipts from revenue for at least the next 6 months. Management is in the process of pursuing financing arrangements in order to meet the Company’s cash flow needs and fund its operations beyond September 30, 2003. There are no assurances that Management will be able to successfully complete any such financing arrangement or that the amounts raised will meet the Company’s cash flow needs. In addition, the Company may require substantial working capital to fund its operations after September 30, 2003 and will need to raise additional capital. It is anticipated that additional funding, as needed, to support operations through and after September 30, 2003 will be obtained

from the following sources: current cash balances and the issuance of additional debt and equity securities. The Company cannot assure its stockholders that additional capital will be available on terms favorable to it, or at all. The various elements of the Company’s business and growth strategies, including its introduction of new products, the expansion of its marketing and distribution activities and obtaining regulatory approval or market acceptance will require additional capital. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, the Company’s ability to fund those business activities essential to its ability to operate profitably, including further research and development, clinical trials, and sales and marketing activities, would be significantly limited.

If the Company’s products do not achieve market acceptance, the Company will not be able to generate the revenue necessary to support its business.

The Company anticipates that ZEUS will comprise a substantial majority of its sales in the future and its future success therefore depends on the successful development, commercialization and market acceptance of this product. Even if the Company is successful in obtaining the necessary regulatory clearances or approvals for ZEUS, its successful commercialization will depend upon the Company’s ability to demonstrate the clinical safety and effectiveness, ease-of-use, reliability and cost-effectiveness of this product in a clinical setting. The Company cannot assure its investors that the FDA will allow it to conduct further clinical trials or that ZEUS will prove to be safe and effective in clinical trials under United States or international regulatory requirements. It is also possible that the Company may encounter problems in clinical testing that cause a delay in or prohibits commercialization of ZEUS. Moreover, the clinical trials may identify significant technical or other obstacles to overcome prior to the commercial deployment of ZEUS, resulting in significant additional product development expense and delays. Even if the safety and effectiveness of procedures using ZEUS are established, surgeons may elect not to recommend the use of these products for any number of reasons. Broad use of the Company’s products will require significant surgeon training and practice, and the time and expense required to complete such training and practice could adversely affect market acceptance. Successful commercialization of the Company’s products will also require that the Company satisfactorily address the needs of various decision makers in the hospitals that constitute the target market for its products and to address potential resistance to change in existing surgical methods. If the Company is unable to gain market acceptance of its products, the Company will not be able to sell enough of its products to be profitable, and the Company may be required to obtain additional funding to develop and bring to market alternative products.

If the Company does not obtain and maintain necessary domestic regulatory approvals and comply with ongoing regulations, the Company will not be able to market and sell its products in the United States.

The Company’s products in the United States are regulated as medical devices by the FDA. The FDA strictly prohibits the marketing of FDA-cleared or approved medical devices for unapproved uses. Failure to receive or delays in receipt of FDA clearances or approvals, including any resulting need for additional clinical trials or data as a prerequisite to approval or clearance, or any FDA conditions that limit the Company’s ability to market its products for particular uses or indications, could impair the Company’s ability to effectively develop a market for its products and impair its ability to operate profitably in the future.

The Company’s operations are subject to the FDA’s Quality System Regulation (a federal regulation governing medical devices) and ISO-9001 (a global standard for quality systems) and similar regulations in other countries, including EN-46001 Standards (the European standard for quality systems), regarding the design, manufacture, testing, labeling, record keeping and storage of devices. Ongoing compliance with FDA’s Quality System Regulation requirements and other applicable regulatory requirements will be monitored through periodic inspection by federal and state agencies, including the FDA, and comparable agencies in other countries. The Company’s manufacturing processes are subject to stringent federal, state and local regulations governing the use, generation, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of certain materials and wastes. Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements can result in, among other things, suspensions or withdrawals of approvals, product seizures, injunctions, recalls of products, operating

restrictions, and civil fines and criminal prosecution. Delays or failure to receive approvals or clearances for the Company’s current submissions, or loss of previously received approvals or clearances, would have a material adverse effect on the marketing and sales of its products and impair its ability to operate profitably in the future.

The Company’s products are subject to various international regulatory processes and approval requirements. If the Company does not maintain the necessary international regulatory approvals, the Company will not be able to market and sell its products in foreign countries.

To be able to market and sell the Company’s products in other countries, it must obtain regulatory approvals and comply with the regulations of those countries. For instance, the European Union requires that manufacturers of medical products obtain the right to affix the CE mark to their products before selling them in member countries of the European Union. The CE mark is an international symbol of adherence to quality assurance standards and compliance with applicable European medical device directives. In order to obtain the right to affix the CE mark to products, a manufacturer must obtain certification that its processes meet certain European quality standards. The Company has obtained the CE mark for all of its products, which means that these products may currently be sold in all of the member countries of the European Union.

If the Company modifies existing products or develops new products in the future, including new instruments, the Company will need to apply for permission to affix the CE mark to such products. In addition, the Company will be subject to annual regulatory audits in order to maintain the CE mark permissions it has already obtained. If the Company is unable to maintain permission to affix the CE mark to its products, it will no longer be able to sell its products in member countries of the European Union.

International sales of the Company’s products account for a significant portion of its revenues and the Company’s growth may be limited if it is unable to successfully manage these international activities

The Company’s business currently depends in large part on its activities in Europe and Asia, and the Company intends to expand its presence into additional foreign markets. Sales to markets outside of the United States accounted for approximately 30% of the Company’s sales for the three months ended September 30, 2002. The Company is subject to a number of challenges that relate to its international business activities. These challenges include:

The Company may never sell enough products to be profitable because the Company’s customers may choose to purchase its competitors’ products or may not accept the Company’s products

The Minimally Invasive Surgery (“MIS”) market has been, and will likely continue to be, highly competitive. Many competitors in this market have significantly greater financial resources and experience than the Company. In addition, some of our competitors, including Intuitive Surgical, have been, and may continue to be able to market their products sooner than the Company if they are able to achieve regulatory approval before the Company. Many medical conditions that can be treated using the Company’s products can also be treated by pharmaceuticals or other medical devices and procedures. Many of these alternative treatments are widely accepted in the medical community and have a long history of use. In addition, technological advances with other procedures could make such therapies more effective or less expensive than using the Company’s products and could render the Company’s products obsolete or unmarketable. As a result, the Company cannot be certain that physicians will use the Company’s products to replace or supplement established treatments or that its products will be competitive with current or future technologies.

If surgeons or institutions are unable to obtain reimbursement from third-party payors for procedures using the Company’s products, or if reimbursement is insufficient to cover the costs of purchasing the Company’s products, the Company may be unable to generate sufficient sales to support its business.

In the United States, the Company’s products are primarily acquired by medical institutions that bill various third-party payors, such as Medicare, Medicaid and other government programs, and private insurance plans for the healthcare services they provide their patients. Third-party payors are increasingly scrutinizing whether to cover new products and the level of reimbursement. There can be no assurance that third-party reimbursement and coverage for the Company’s products will be available or adequate, that current reimbursement amounts will not be decreased in the future, or that future legislation, regulation or reimbursement policies of third-party payors will not otherwise affect the demand for the Company’s products or the Company’s ability to sell its products on a profitable basis, particularly if the Company’s products are more expensive than competing surgical or other procedures. If third-party payor coverage or reimbursement is unavailable or inadequate, those who purchase the Company’s products would lose their ability to pay for the Company’s products, and the Company’s ability to make future sales and collect on outstanding accounts would be significantly impaired, which would limit the Company’s ability to operate profitably.

If the Company is unable to protect the intellectual property contained in its products from use by third parties, the Company’s ability to compete in the market will be harmed.

The Company’s success depends, in part, on its ability to obtain and maintain patent protection for its products by filing United States and foreign patent applications related to its technology, inventions and improvements. However, there can be no assurance that third parties will not seek to assert that the Company’s devices and systems infringe their patents or seek to expand their patent claims to cover aspects of the Company’s technology. As a result, there can be no assurance that the Company will not become subject to future patent infringement claims or litigation in a court of law, interference proceedings, or opposition to a patent granted in a foreign jurisdiction. The defense and prosecution of such intellectual property claims are costly, time-consuming, divert the attention of management and technical personnel and could result in substantial cost and uncertainty regarding the Company’s future viability. Future litigation or regulatory proceedings, which could result in substantial cost and uncertainty, may also be necessary to enforce the Company’s patent or other intellectual property rights or to determine the scope and validity of other parties’ proprietary rights. Any public announcements related to such litigation or regulatory proceedings initiated by the Company, or initiated or threatened against the Company by its competitors, could adversely affect the price of the Company’s stock.

The Company also relies upon trade secrets, technical know-how and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain its competitive position, and the Company typically requires its employees, consultants and advisors to execute confidentiality and assignment of inventions agreements in connection with their employment, consulting or advisory relationships. There can be no assurance, however, that these agreements will not be breached or that the Company will have adequate remedies for any breach. Failure to

protect the Company’s intellectual property would limit its ability to produce and/or market its products in the future that would adversely affect the Company’s revenues generated by the sale of such products.

The Company is involved in intellectual property litigation with Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Brookhill-Wilk which may hurt the Company’s competitive position, may be costly to the Company and may prevent the Company from selling its products.

On February 21, 2001, Brookhill-Wilk filed suit against the Company alleging that its ZEUS surgical system infringed upon Brookhill-Wilk’s United States Patent Nos. 5,217,003 and 5,368,015. Brookhill-Wilk’s complaint seeks damages, attorneys’ fees and increased damages alleging willful patent infringement. On March 21, 2001, the Company served its Answer and Counterclaim alleging non-infringement of each patent-in-suit, patent invalidity and unenforceability. On November 8, 2001, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the co-pending Brookhill-Wilk v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Civil Action No. 00-CV-6599 (NRB), issued an order interpreting the claims of Brookhill-Wilk’s Patent No. 5,217,003 in a way that the Company believes excludes current applications of its ZEUS surgical system. In light of this decision, on November 13, 2001, the parties to Brookhill Wilk v. Computer Motion, Inc. agreed to dismiss the case without prejudice. On March 25, 2002, Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein dismissed the case without prejudice.

On March 30, 2001, Intuitive and IBM Corporation filed suit alleging that the Company’s AESOP, ZEUS and HERMES products infringe United States Patent No. 6,201,984 which was issued on March 13, 2001. The complaint seeks damages, a preliminary injunction, a permanent injunction, and costs and attorneys’ fees. The claims are directed to a surgical system employing voice recognition for control of a surgical instrument. Each of the asserted claims are limited to a surgical system employing voice recognition for control of a surgical robot and literally read on the Company’s current AESOP product and the Company’s ZEUS and HERMES products to the extent they are used with AESOP. A jury trial has been held on the issues of patent invalidity due to lack of enablement and failure to disclose the best mode in addition to damages. The Company’s defense of unenforceability due to prosecution laches was tried before the District Court Judge. The jury returned a verdict finding IBM’s United States Patent No. 6,201,984 valid, and finding Intuitive was damaged in an amount of $4.4 million. Prior to the jury’s verdict, the court ruled that the Company had not “willfully” infringed the patent. The court has not, at this time, given its verdict on the Company’s prosecution laches defense. A verdict in the Company’s favor on the prosecution laches defense could result in a finding that the patent is not enforceable and negate the damages verdict.

The Company believes that all of its major product lines could be affected by this litigation. The patents subject to this litigation are an integral part of the technology incorporated in the Company’s AESOP, ZEUS and HERMES product lines which together accounted for approximately 70% of its revenues for the quarter ended June 30, 2002. If the Company loses the counterclaim on the patent suit brought by Intuitive or the patent infringement claims by Intuitive or IBM or if the decision in Brookhill-Wilk v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. is reversed, the Company may be prevented from selling its products as currently configured without first obtaining a license to the disputed technology from the successful party or modifying the product. Obtaining a license could be expensive, or could require that the Company license to the successful party some of its own proprietary technology, either of which result could seriously harm the Company’s business. In the event that a successful party is unwilling to grant the Company a license, the Company will be required to stop selling its products that are found to infringe the successful party’s patents unless the Company can redesign them so they do not infringe these patents, which the Company may be unable to do. Whether or not the Company is successful in these lawsuits, the litigation could consume substantial amounts of the Company’s financial and managerial resources. Further, because of the substantial amount of discovery often involved in connection with this type of litigation, there is a risk that some of the Company’s confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during the discovery process.

Because the Company’s industry is subject to rapid technological change and new product development, the Company’s future success will depend upon its ability to expand the applications of the Company’s products.

The Company’s success will depend, to a significant extent, upon its ability to enhance and expand the utility of its products so that they gain market acceptance. Failure to develop or introduce new products or product enhancements on a timely basis that achieve market acceptance could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. In the past, some of the Company’s competitors have been able to develop desirable product features (such as articulation of certain instruments and three dimensional visualization of their products) earlier than the Company. The Company’s inability to rapidly develop these features may have led to lower sales of some of the Company’s products. In addition,

technological advances with other therapies could make such therapies less expensive or more effective than using the Company’s products and could render its technology obsolete or unmarketable. There can be no assurance that physicians will use the Company’s products to replace or supplement established treatments or that the Company’s products will be competitive with current or future technologies

The Company may not be able to expand its marketing distribution activities in order to market its products competitively.

The Company anticipates significantly increasing the number of sales personnel to more fully cover its target markets, particularly as the Company expands its product offerings. It is possible the Company will be unable to compete effectively in attracting, motivating and retaining qualified sales personnel. Additionally, the Company currently intends to market and sell its products outside the United States and Europe, principally through distributors. In order to accomplish this, the Company will be required to expand its distributor network. The Company may not be able to identify suitable distributors or negotiate acceptable distribution agreements and any such distribution agreements may not result in significant sales. If the Company is unable to identify, attract, motivate and retain qualified sales personnel, suitable distributors or negotiate acceptable distribution agreements, the Company may not be successful in expanding the market for its products outside of the United States and Europe.

Concentration of ownership among the Company’s existing executive officers, directors and principal stockholders may prevent new investors from influencing significant corporate decisions.

If the Company loses its key personnel or is unable to attract and retain additional personnel, the Company’s ability to compete will be harmed.

The Company’s future business and operating results depend in significant part on its key management, scientific, technical and sales personnel, many of whom would be difficult to replace, and future success will depend partially upon the Company’s ability to retain these persons and recruit additional qualified management, technical, marketing, sales, regulatory, clinical and manufacturing personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense and the Company may have difficulty attracting or retaining such personnel. In addition, the Company does not have employment agreements with most of the Company’s key personnel and also does not maintain life insurance on any of its employees which may make it more difficult to retain its key personnel in the future.

The Company’s future operating results may fall below securities analysts’ or investors’ expectations, which could cause the Company’s stock price to decline and diminish the value of its investors’ holdings.

The Company may incur substantial costs defending securities class action litigation due to its stock price volatility.

Securities class action litigation has often been brought against companies when the market price of their securities declines. The Company could be especially prone to such risk because technology companies have experienced greater than average stock price volatility in recent years. If the Company is subject to securities litigation, the Company would incur substantial costs and divert management’s attention defending any such claims.

The Company’s reliance on sole or single source suppliers could harm its ability to meet demand for the Company’s products in a timely manner or within its projected budget.

The Company relies on independent contract manufacturers, some of which are single source suppliers, for the manufacture of the principal components of its products. In some instances, the Company relies on companies that are sole suppliers of key components of its products. If one of these sole suppliers goes out of business, the Company could face significant production delays until an alternate supplier is found, or until the product could be redesigned and revalidated to accommodate a new supplier’s replacement component. In addition, the Company generally submits purchase orders based upon its suppliers’ current price lists. Since the Company generally does not have written contracts for future purchase orders with its suppliers, these suppliers may increase the cost of the parts the Company purchases in the future.

The Company’s manufacturing experience to date has been focused primarily on assembling components produced by third-party manufacturers. In scaling up manufacturing of new products, the Company may encounter difficulties involving quality control and assurance, component availability, adequacy of control policies and procedures, lack of qualified personnel and compliance with the FDA’s Quality System Regulations requirements. The Company may elect to internally manufacture components currently provided by third parties or to implement new production processes. The Company cannot assure its stockholders that manufacturing yields or costs will not be adversely affected by a transition to in-house production or to new production processes if such efforts are undertaken. If necessary, this expansion will

require the commitment of capital resources for facilities, tooling and equipment and for leasehold improvements. Further, the Company’s delay or inability to expand its manufacturing capacity or to obtain the commitment of such resources could result in its inability to meet demand for its products, which could harm the Company’s ability to generate revenues, lead to customer dissatisfaction and damage its reputation.

The use of the Company’s products could result in product liability claims that could be expensive and harm its business.

As a medical device manufacturer, the Company faces an inherent business risk of financial exposure to product liability claims in the event that the use of its products results in personal injury or death. The Company also faces the possibility that defects in the design or manufacture of its products might necessitate a product recall. It is possible that the Company will experience losses due to product liability claims or recalls in the future. The Company currently maintains product liability insurance with coverage limits of $5,000,000, but future claims may exceed these coverage limits. The Company may also require increased product liability coverage as additional potential products are successfully commercialized. Such insurance is expensive, difficult to obtain and may not be available in the future on acceptable terms, or at all. While the Company has not had any material product liability claims to date, its defense of any future product liability claim, regardless of its merit or eventual outcome, would divert management’s attention and result in significant legal costs. In addition, a product liability claim or any product recalls could also harm its reputation or result in a decline in revenues.

The Company’s continued growth will significantly strain its resources and, if the Company fails to manage this growth, its ability to market, sell and develop its products may be harmed.

The Company’s growth will continue to place significant demands on its management and resources. In order to compete effectively against current and future competitors, prepare products for clinical trials and develop future products, the Company believes it must continue to expand its operations, particularly in the areas of research and development and sales and marketing. It is likely that the Company will be required to implement additional operating and financial controls, hire and train additional personnel, install additional reporting and management information systems and expand its physical operations. The Company’s future success will depend, in part, on its ability to manage future growth and the Company cannot assure its investors that it will be successful.

Future Sales of the Company’s Stock Could Depress the Market Price of its Common Stock

Future sales of the Company’s common stock could depress the market price of its common stock. On February 28, 2002 the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-83552) covering the resale of 5,075,771 shares of its common stock by certain selling stockholders. In addition, on or prior to February 13, 2002, the Company issued 2,911,039 shares of common stock upon conversion of all the shares of its Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. The Company filed a registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-58962) covering the shares of common stock issued to holders upon the conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and issuable upon exercise of certain warrants issued to the former holder of its Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. This registration statement was declared effective by the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2001. In the future, the Company may issue additional options, warrants or other derivative securities convertible into its common stock. The public sale of the Company’s common stock by the selling stockholders who control large blocks of its common stock could depress the market price of its common stock.

Failure to Satisfy NASDAQ National Market listing requirements may result in the Company’s stock being delisted from the NASDAQ National Market and being subject to restrictions on “Penny Stock”

requirements, $10.0 million in stockholders’ equity, a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share, and a market value of its public float of at least $5.0 million. On October 31, 2002, with the proceeds from the private placement of preferred stock, the Company has achieved compliance with the new minimum stockholders’ equity standard. In the event that the Company fails to maintain the minimum stockholders’ equity standard or other listing standards on a continuous basis, the Company’s common stock may be removed from listing on the Nasdaq National Market. If the Company’s common stock is delisted from the Nasdaq National Market, and the Company is not able to list the shares on the Nasdaq Small Cap Market or another exchange, trading of its common stock, if any, would be conducted in the over-the-counter market in the so-called “pink sheets” or, if available, the NASDAQ’s “Electronic Bulletin Board.” As a result, stockholders could find it more difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations as to the value of the Company’s common stock, and the trading price per share could decline.

• Prior to the sale of penny stock by a broker-dealer to a new purchaser, the broker-dealer must determine whether the purchaser is suitable to invest in penny stocks. To make that determination, a broker-dealer must obtain, from a prospective investor, information regarding the purchaser’s financial condition and investment experience and objectives. Subsequently, the broker-dealer must deliver to the purchaser a written statement setting forth the basis of the suitability finding. A broker-dealer must obtain from the purchaser a written agreement to purchase the securities. This agreement must be obtained for every purchase until the purchaser becomes an “established customer.”

A dealer that sells penny stock must send to the purchaser, within ten days after the end of each calendar month, a written account statement including prescribed information relating to the security. As a result of a failure to maintain the trading of the Company’s stock on the Nasdaq National Market and the rules regarding penny stock transactions, the investors’ ability to sell to a third party may be limited. The Company makes no guarantee that its current market-makers will continue to make a market in its securities, or that any market for its securities will continue.

The Company’s principal executive officer and its chief accounting officer, based on their evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -14 (c)) as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are adequate and effective for the purposes set forth in the definition in Exchange Act rules.

asserted claims is limited to a surgical system employing voice recognition for control of a surgical instrument and literally read on Computer Motion’s current AESOP product and Computer Motion’s ZEUS and HERMES products to the extent they are used with AESOP. A jury trial has been held on the issues of patent invalidity due to lack of enablement and failure to disclose the best mode in addition to damages. The Company’s defense of unenforceability due to prosecution laches was tried before the District Court Judge. The jury returned a verdict finding IBM’s United States Patent No. 6,201,984 valid, and finding Intuitive was damaged in an amount of $4.4 million. Prior to the jury’s verdict, the court ruled that the Company had not “willfully” infringed the patent. The court has not, at this time, given its verdict on the Company’s prosecution laches defense. A verdict in the Company’s favor on the prosecution laches defense could result in a finding that the patent is not enforceable and negate the damages verdict.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2002, the Company received a bridge loan advance in the aggregate amount of $1,000,000 from Robert W. Duggan, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Subsequent to September 30, 2002, the Company negotiated final terms of the bridge loan with another investor and, in connection therewith, the Company issued unsecured, 180-day promissory notes for $1,000,000 to Robert W. Duggan and the other bridge lender. The notes then were converted into shares of Series C Preferred Stock issued in the Company’s recent private placement, except that the conversion of Mr. Duggan’s note is subject to the stockholder approval. Interest accrues at 8.5% per annum on the promissory notes and is convertible into shares of the Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, subject to stockholder approval at a special meeting to be held early next year (See Note 12 – “Subsequent Event”)

In January 2002, the Company entered into a secured, revolving line of credit (or factoring agreement) with a third party financing company. This line of credit provides for borrowings up to $2,000,000 based on eligible domestic trade receivables at a factoring fee of 2%, plus a financing fee of prime rate plus 3%, and is secured by all of the assets of the Company. The six-month term of this revolving line of credit expired in July 2002 and was not renewed. As of September 30, 2002 no amounts were outstanding under the accounts receivable financing agreement.

Company’s common stock was used to retire approximately $2,360,000 in debt (including the remaining principal and accrued interest of $968,000 under a promissory note payable to Mr. Duggan) and the remainder of the proceeds were used to fund working capital needs due to investments in clinical trials, research and development, sales and marketing programs and for other general operating requirements. In February 2002, the Company issued 328,689 additional shares of its common stock to certain vendors who agreed to cancel $1,395,000 of accounts payable owed to these vendors as consideration for their shares.

On February 13, 2002, the holders of the Company’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock entered into agreements with the Company whereby they agreed to convert all of their remaining shares of Mandatorily Redeemable Series B Convertible Preferred Stock into shares of common stock. The Company issued 2,196,341 shares of common stock upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. In connection with this conversion, the Company agreed to pay to the holders the present value of the future dividends payable on their shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. This dividend payment was made by the issuance of 312,869 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company also agreed to lower the exercise price of certain warrants issued to the holders of its Series B Convertible Preferred Stock from $8.12 to $5.00 per share.

On July 16, 2002, the Company held its annual meeting of the stockholders with stockholders holding 14,329,035 shares of Common Stock (representing (83.2%) of the total number of shares outstanding and entitled to vote) present in person or by proxy at the meeting. Proxies for the meeting were solicited pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Daniel R. Doiron, Robert W. Duggan, Jeffrey O. Henley, and Yulun Wang were listed as management’s nominees in the proxy statement and were elected as directors at the meeting. The votes for each nominee were as follows:

Name	Number of Affirmative Votes	Number of Negative Votes
Daniel R. Doiron	13,882,324	446,711
Robert W. Duggan	13,814,845	514,190
Jeffrey O. Henley	13,882,324	446,711
Yulun Wang	13,884,984	444,051

certain dilutive issuances. The proposal was approved with 5,777,120 affirmative votes, 706,522 negative votes and 980,384 abstentions.

a.)	Exhibits

	99.1 Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

	99.2 Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

b)	Reports on Form 8-K.

	Report on Form 8-K, dated April 3, 2002, filed by the Company to report on the status of its intellectual property litigation proceedings with Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

	Report on Form 8-K, dated June 7, 2002, filed by the Company to report the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as its new independent accountants.

Date: November 14, 2002	COMPUTER MOTION, INC.

	By:	/s/ Robert W. Duggan

		Robert W. Duggan
		Chairman of the Board of Directors
		and Chief Executive Officer

	By:	/s/ Larry Redfern

		Larry Redfern
		Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results or operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Exchange Act) for the registrant and we have:

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated: November 14, 2002	COMPUTER MOTION, INC.

	By:	/s/ Robert W. Duggan

		Robert W. Duggan
		Chairman of the Board of Directors
		and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 14, 2002	COMPUTER MOTION, INC.

	By:	/s/ Larry Redfern

		Larry Redfern
		Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

Exhibit		Description

	99.1	Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

	99.2	Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.


		CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
		CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
		CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
	ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
	ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
	ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
	ITEM 1. LITIGATION
	ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
	ITEM 4. SUBMISSIONS OF MATTERS TO VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
	ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
SIGNATURE
EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT 99.1
EXHIBIT 99.2

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents