SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) [X] Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 29, 2002
OR
[ ] | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
Commission File No. 0-11007
EMULEX CORPORATION
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 3535 Harbor Boulevard Costa Mesa, California (Address of principal executive offices) |
51-0300558 (I.R.S Employer Identification No.) 92626 (Zip Code) |
(714) 662-5600
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ X ] No [ ]
As of November 5, 2002, the registrant had 81,950,169 shares of common stock outstanding.
EMULEX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
PAGE | |||||
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|||||
Item 1. Financial Statements |
|||||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
September 29, 2002 and June 30, 2002 |
2 | ||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Three months ended September 29, 2002
and September 30, 2001 |
3 | ||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Three months ended September 29, 2002
and September 30, 2001 |
4 | ||||
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
5 | ||||
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of |
|||||
Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
11 | ||||
Item 3. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
30 | ||||
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |
30 | ||||
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION |
|||||
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
30 | ||||
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
32 | ||||
Signatures |
34 |
1
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
EMULEX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
September 29, | June 30, | |||||||||
2002 | 2002 | |||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 129,406 | $ | 282,561 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
1,740 | 2,024 | ||||||||
Investments |
192,747 | 227,905 | ||||||||
Accounts and other receivables, net |
40,521 | 36,259 | ||||||||
Inventories, net |
18,376 | 14,833 | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses |
3,768 | 3,779 | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
37,536 | 30,205 | ||||||||
Total current assets |
424,094 | 597,566 | ||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
18,376 | 18,574 | ||||||||
Investments |
224,092 | 119,302 | ||||||||
Goodwill, net |
397,256 | 397,256 | ||||||||
Other intangibles, net |
31,421 | 32,874 | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
5,136 | 29,385 | ||||||||
Other assets |
7,908 | 12,407 | ||||||||
$ | 1,108,283 | $ | 1,207,364 | |||||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 16,601 | $ | 12,663 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities |
18,474 | 19,677 | ||||||||
Income taxes payable |
8,391 | 7,020 | ||||||||
Total current liabilities |
43,466 | 39,360 | ||||||||
Convertible subordinated notes |
208,518 | 345,000 | ||||||||
251,984 | 384,360 | |||||||||
Commitments and contingencies (note 7) |
||||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares
authorized (150,000 shares designated as Series A
Junior Participating Preferred Stock); none issued
and outstanding |
| | ||||||||
Common stock, $0.10 par value; 240,000,000 shares
authorized; 81,876,248 and 81,800,909 issued
and outstanding at September 29, 2002, and
June 30, 2002, respectively |
8,188 | 8,180 | ||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
899,263 | 898,803 | ||||||||
Deferred compensation |
(6,310 | ) | (7,156 | ) | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(44,842 | ) | (76,823 | ) | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
856,299 | 823,004 | ||||||||
$ | 1,108,283 | $ | 1,207,364 | |||||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. |
2
EMULEX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
September 29, | September 30, | |||||||||
2002 | 2001 | |||||||||
Net revenues |
$ | 70,425 | $ | 52,744 | ||||||
Cost of sales |
27,882 | 38,964 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
42,543 | 13,780 | ||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||
Engineering and development |
13,673 | 10,909 | ||||||||
Selling and marketing |
4,664 | 5,299 | ||||||||
General and administrative |
2,746 | 2,847 | ||||||||
Amortization of goodwill and other intangibles |
1,453 | 39,064 | ||||||||
Total operating expenses |
22,536 | 58,119 | ||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
20,007 | (44,339 | ) | |||||||
Nonoperating income: |
||||||||||
Gain on repurchase of convertible subordinated notes |
28,729 | | ||||||||
Interest income |
3,702 | 2,603 | ||||||||
Interest expense |
(1,804 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||
Other income (expense), net |
(30 | ) | 122 | |||||||
Total nonoperating income |
30,597 | 2,719 | ||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
50,604 | (41,620 | ) | |||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
18,623 | (1,587 | ) | |||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 31,981 | $ | (40,033 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.39 | $ | (0.49 | ) | |||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.37 | $ | (0.49 | ) | |||||
Number of shares used in per share computations: |
||||||||||
Basic |
81,844 | 81,754 | ||||||||
Diluted |
89,166 | 81,754 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. |
3
EMULEX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended | |||||||||||
September 29, | September 30, | ||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 31,981 | $ | (40,033 | ) | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment |
2,532 | 1,766 | |||||||||
Gain on repurchase of convertible subordinated notes |
(28,729 | ) | | ||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
846 | 954 | |||||||||
Amortization of goodwill and other intangibles |
1,453 | 39,064 | |||||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment |
24 | | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
16,918 | | |||||||||
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
287 | | |||||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
56 | 105 | |||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|||||||||||
Accounts and other receivables |
(4,318 | ) | 204 | ||||||||
Inventories |
(3,543 | ) | 13,248 | ||||||||
Income taxes receivable |
| (1,587 | ) | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
749 | (145 | ) | ||||||||
Accounts payable |
3,938 | (7,815 | ) | ||||||||
Accrued liabilities |
(1,026 | ) | 3,647 | ||||||||
Income taxes payable |
1,371 | (10 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
22,539 | 9,398 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|||||||||||
Additions to property and equipment |
(2,358 | ) | (2,346 | ) | |||||||
Decrease in restricted cash related to construction escrow account |
284 | | |||||||||
Purchases of investments |
(228,771 | ) | (119,297 | ) | |||||||
Maturities of investments |
159,139 | 123,057 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
(71,706 | ) | 1,414 | ||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under stock option plans |
181 | 274 | |||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
| (10,539 | ) | ||||||||
Repurchase of convertible subordinated notes |
(104,169 | ) | | ||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(103,988 | ) | (10,265 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(153,155 | ) | 547 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
282,561 | 36,471 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 129,406 | $ | 37,018 | |||||||
Supplemental disclosures: |
|||||||||||
Cash paid during the period for: |
|||||||||||
Interest |
$ | 3,052 | $ | 6 | |||||||
Income taxes |
502 | 10 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. |
4
EMULEX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation | |
In the opinion of the Company, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (which are normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position as of September 29, 2002, and June 30, 2002, and the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended September 29, 2002, and September 30, 2001, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the three month periods then ended. Certain reclassifications have been made to the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2002, to conform to the presentation as of September 29, 2002. Interim results for the three months ended September 29, 2002, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending June 29, 2003. The interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002. | ||
Effective July 1, 2002, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement (Statement) 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, under which the recoverability of long-lived assets is assessed by determining whether the carrying value of an asset can be recovered through projected undiscounted future operating cash flows over its remaining life. The amount of impairment, if any, is measured based on fair value, which is determined using projected discounted future operating cash flows. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. | ||
2. | Inventories | |
Inventories, net, are summarized as follows: |
September 29, | June 30, | |||||||
2002 | 2002 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 6,021 | $ | 4,166 | ||||
Finished goods |
12,355 | 10,667 | ||||||
$ | 18,376 | $ | 14,833 | |||||
Starting in late September 2001, some of the Companys major customers made announcements that general economic conditions, exacerbated by the increase in economic uncertainty in the aftermath of the terrorist events of September 11, 2001, were having a negative impact on their financial results. The announcements made, and forecasts received, indicated deteriorating demand for the Companys one gigabit per second (Gbps) products as these customers were expected to migrate to two Gbps products for future purchases. As a result, the Company recorded an excess and obsolete inventory charge totaling $13.6 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2002. Subsequently, as a result of the sale of products for which a reserve had been recorded, the Company recorded a reduction of $0.2 million of this excess and obsolete inventory charge for the first three months of fiscal 2003 ended September 29, 2002. As of September 29, 2002, the remaining reserve for one Gbps products was $8.2 million. As with all inventory, the Company regularly compares forecasted demand for its one Gbps products against inventory on hand and open purchase commitments. Accordingly, the Company may have to increase excess and obsolete inventory reserves as forecasted demand changes. As of September 29, 2002, the Company had unreserved inventory on hand of approximately $4.1 million related to its one Gbps products. |
5
3. | Goodwill and Other Intangibles | |
Goodwill and other intangibles, net, are as follows: |
September 29, | June 30, | |||||||||
2002 | 2002 | |||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||
Intangible assets not subject to amortization: |
||||||||||
Goodwill, net |
$ | 397,256 | $ | 395,470 | ||||||
Assembled workforce, net |
| 1,786 | ||||||||
Intangible assets not subject to amortization |
$ | 397,256 | $ | 397,256 | ||||||
Intangible assets subject to amortization: |
||||||||||
Core technology and patents |
$ | 40,600 | $ | 40,600 | ||||||
Accumulated amortization, Core technology and patents |
(9,183 | ) | (7,733 | ) | ||||||
Completed technology |
20 | 20 | ||||||||
Accumulated amortization, Completed technology |
(16 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||
Intangible assets subject to amortization |
$ | 31,421 | $ | 32,874 | ||||||
Effective July 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement 142. As a result, the Company ceased amortizing goodwill of $397.3 million beginning July 1, 2002. Included in goodwill is $1.8 million of assembled workforce that was reclassified to goodwill effective July 1, 2002. In conjunction with the adoption of Statement 142, the Company completed its transitional goodwill impairment test for its one reporting unit during the three months ended September 29, 2002, with no impairment charges resulting. The goodwill will be tested for impairment at least annually. | ||
The intangible assets subject to amortization are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: |
Core technology and patents |
7 | |||
Completed technology |
2 |
Aggregated amortization expense for the three months ended September 29, 2002, was $1.5 million and for the next five fiscal years is expected to be (in thousands): |
For fiscal year ended 2003 |
$ | 5,807 | ||
For fiscal year ended 2004 |
$ | 5,800 | ||
For fiscal year ended 2005 |
$ | 5,800 | ||
For fiscal year ended 2006 |
$ | 5,800 | ||
For fiscal year ended 2007 |
$ | 5,800 |
6
The following table presents the impact on net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share had Statement 142 been in effect for the three months ended September 30, 2001. |
Three Months Ended | |||||||||
September 29, | September 30, | ||||||||
2002 | 2001 | ||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) | |||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 31,981 | $ | (40,033 | ) | ||||
Add back: Goodwill amortization |
| 37,444 | |||||||
Add back: Assembled workforce amortization |
| 168 | |||||||
Adjusted net income (loss) |
$ | 31,981 | $ | (2,421 | ) | ||||
Basic net income (loss) per share: |
|||||||||
Net income (loss) per share |
$ | 0.39 | $ | (0.49 | ) | ||||
Add back: Goodwill amortization |
| 0.46 | |||||||
Add back: Assembled workforce amortization |
| | |||||||
Adjusted basic net income (loss) per share |
$ | 0.39 | $ | (0.03 | ) | ||||
Diluted net income (loss) per share: |
|||||||||
Net income (loss) per share |
$ | 0.37 | $ | (0.49 | ) | ||||
Add back: Goodwill amortization |
| 0.46 | |||||||
Add back: Assembled workforce amortization |
| | |||||||
Adjusted diluted net income (loss) per share |
$ | 0.37 | $ | (0.03 | ) | ||||
4. | Other Assets | |
Components of other assets are as follows: |
September 29, | June 30, | |||||||
2002 | 2002 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Deferred debt issuance costs convertible subordinated notes, net |
$ | 5,648 | $ | 9,882 | ||||
Prepaid licensing fee |
1,166 | 1,417 | ||||||
Refundable deposits |
1,094 | 1,108 | ||||||
$ | 7,908 | $ | 12,407 | |||||
5. | Accrued Liabilities | |
Components of accrued liabilities are as follows: |
September 29, | June 30, | |||||||
2002 | 2002 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Payroll and related costs |
$ | 6,801 | $ | 6,369 | ||||
Accrued inventory purchases |
3,208 | 3,208 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
598 | 2,498 | ||||||
Warranty and related reserves |
2,200 | 2,244 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
1,080 | 1,255 | ||||||
Advertising and promotions |
1,594 | 1,628 | ||||||
Other |
2,993 | 2,475 | ||||||
$ | 18,474 | $ | 19,677 | |||||
7
6. | Convertible Subordinated Notes | |
On January 23, 2002, the Company announced a private placement of $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 1.75 percent convertible subordinated notes due February 1, 2007. Interest is payable in cash on February 1 and August 1 of each year beginning August 1, 2002. In addition, the Company granted the initial purchasers of the notes a 30-day option, which they exercised, to purchase an additional $45.0 million principal amount of the notes. These notes may be converted by the holder at any time into shares of the Companys common stock at the conversion price of $53.84 per share, subject to the potential adjustments described in the terms of the notes issued. The Company may redeem the notes on or after February 5, 2005, in whole or in part. The Company incurred associated issuance costs of approximately $11.0 million (see note 4). The $345.0 million transaction closed on January 29, 2002. | ||
During the three months ended September 29, 2002, the Companys Board of Directors expanded the Companys stock repurchase program to include the repurchase of the Companys convertible subordinated notes as well as shares of the Companys common stock. The combined program authorizes the repurchase of up to four million shares with three million shares of common stock still available for repurchase at September 29, 2002, and up to an additional $125.0 million to be spent on the repurchase of the convertible subordinated notes. In August 2002, the Company bought back approximately $136.5 million of its convertible subordinated notes at a discount to face value, spending $104.2 million. The repurchased notes were cancelled, leaving convertible subordinated notes outstanding with a face value of $208.5 million, which, if converted, would result in the issuance of approximately 3.9 million shares. The resulting net pre-tax gain of $28.7 million from the repurchase of the convertible subordinated notes was recorded for the three months ended September 29, 2002. | ||
7. | Commitments and Contingencies | |
Litigation | ||
Beginning on or about February 20, 2001, the Company and certain of its officers and directors were named as defendants in a number of securities class action lawsuits filed in the United States District Court, Central District of California. The plaintiffs in the actions purport to represent purchasers of the Companys common stock during various periods ranging from January 18, 2001, through February 9, 2001. The complaints allege that the Company and certain of its officers and directors made misrepresentations and omissions in violation of sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The complaints generally seek compensatory damages, costs and attorneys fees in an unspecified amount. Pursuant to a Stipulation and Court Order, the actions have been consolidated. On August 24, 2001, an Amended and Consolidated Complaint was filed. Defendants motion to dismiss was denied by way of an order dated March 7, 2002. Defendants motion for reconsideration of that order was denied by an order dated May 3, 2002. Plaintiffs have commenced discovery. The court certified the class action by an order dated September 30, 2002. The court has scheduled a trial setting conference on June 6, 2003, with an expectation that the case will be set for trial in July, 2003. As a result of these class action lawsuits, a number of derivative cases were filed in state courts in California and Delaware, and in federal court in California, alleging that certain officers and directors breached their fiduciary duties to the Company in connection with the events alleged in the class action lawsuits. The derivative cases filed in California state courts have been consolidated in Orange County Superior Court and plaintiffs filed a consolidated and amended complaint on January 31, 2002. On May 10, 2002, the Orange County Superior Court ordered that the consolidated actions be stayed pending resolution of the federal class action described above. The derivative suit in Delaware was dismissed on August 28, 2001. On March 15, 2002, the United States District Court for the Central District of California ordered that the federal derivative action be stayed pending resolution of the class action lawsuit described above. The plaintiffs in that action filed a motion for reconsideration of that order, which was denied by an order dated June 3, 2002. The above-described litigation could result in substantial costs to the Company and a diversion of managements attention and resources. While the Company believes that the lawsuits are without legal merit and intends to defend them vigorously, because the lawsuits are at an early stage, it is not possible to predict whether the Company will incur any material liability in connection with such lawsuits. The Company has received inquiries about events giving rise to the lawsuits from the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Nasdaq Stock Market. |
8
Additionally, the Company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity. | ||
Other Commitments and Contingencies | ||
The Company is undergoing examination by the Internal Revenue Service of Emulex Corporations 1998 U.S. tax return. It is managements belief that the outcome of this examination will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity. | ||
Effective October 11, 2002, the Board of Directors approved authorization of an additional 750 thousand shares for issuance under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, subject to stockholder approval. As a result, in the event the fair market value of the Companys common stock increases above $10.85 (the fair market value as of the close of business on October 11, 2002) on the date the amendment is approved by the stockholders, the Company will incur a charge against earnings. Because the amount of such charge depends on employee participation levels as well as the future price of the Companys common stock, the exact amount of any such charge cannot be calculated at this time. The annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company will be held on November 21, 2002. | ||
The Company recorded an estimated excess and obsolete inventory charge of $13.6 million associated with older-generation one Gbps products during the three months ended September 30, 2001. Subsequently, as a result of the sale of products for which a reserve had been recorded, the Company recorded a reduction of $0.2 million of this excess and obsolete inventory charge for the first three months of fiscal 2003 ended September 29, 2002. As of September 29, 2002, the remaining reserve for one Gbps products was $8.2 million. As with all inventory, the Company regularly compares forecasted demand for its one Gbps products against inventory on hand and open purchase commitments. Accordingly, the Company may have to increase excess and obsolete inventory reserves as forecasted demand changes. As of September 29, 2002, the Company had unreserved inventory on hand of approximately $4.1 million related to its one Gbps products. | ||
The Company was previously required to enter into an end-of-life purchase agreement for a key inventory component as the sole-source manufacturer of this component announced their discontinued manufacturing of the component. As of September 29, 2002, the Companys remaining purchase obligation was $10.4 million. In relation to the excess and obsolete inventory charge associated with older generation one Gbps products, the Company has accrued $3.2 million, which represented the Companys commitment to purchase this key component in excess of forecasted demand and as a result was impaired. | ||
During the third quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company entered into an agreement to relocate its headquarters locally in Costa Mesa, California. The Company will finance the build to suit construction phase of the new facility with its own capital, before beginning a 10-year lease term with an option to buy the land and buildings during the first six months of the lease term. If the Company does not exercise its option to purchase the facility, the landlord will obtain permanent financing and reimburse the Company for the construction costs. The Companys total gross undiscounted financial commitment for the 10-year lease term would be approximately $46.0 million. At September 29, 2002, the Company had restricted cash of $1.7 million in escrow associated with the construction of the headquarters. | ||
8. | Earnings per Share | |
Basic net income (loss) per share and diluted net loss per share are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing adjusted net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period increased to include, if dilutive, the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares from stock option plans and convertible subordinated notes had been issued. The dilutive effect of outstanding stock options is reflected in diluted net income per share by application of the treasury stock method. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share: |
9
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
September 29, | September 30, | |||||||||
2002 | 2001 | |||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 31,981 | $ | (40,033 | ) | |||||
Adjustment for interest expense on convertible
subordinated notes, net of tax |
1,141 | | ||||||||
Numerator for diluted net income (loss) per share |
$ | 33,122 | $ | (40,333 | ) | |||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||
Denominator for basic net income (loss) per
share weighted average shares outstanding |
81,844 | 81,754 | ||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||
Dilutive options outstanding |
1,806 | | ||||||||
Dilutive common shares from assumed conversion of
subordinated notes |
5,516 | | ||||||||
Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per
share adjusted weighted average shares |
89,166 | 81,754 | ||||||||
Basic net income (loss) per share |
$ | 0.39 | $ | (0.49 | ) | |||||
Diluted net income (loss) per share |
$ | 0.37 | $ | (0.49 | ) | |||||
Antidilutive options excluded from computation |
5,673 | 9,557 | ||||||||
Average market price of common stock |
$ | 18.85 | $ | 21.20 | ||||||
The antidilutive options were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share because the options exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares during the three months ended September 29, 2002. As the Company recorded a net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2001, all outstanding stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share, because the effect would have been antidilutive. |
10
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements contained in this Form 10-Q may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company may also make forward-looking statements in other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in materials delivered to stockholders and in press releases. In addition, the Companys representatives may from time to time make oral forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements provide current expectations of future events based on certain assumptions and include any statement that does not directly relate to any historical or current fact. Words such as anticipates, in the opinion, believes, intends, expects, may, will, should, could, plans, forecasts, estimates, predicts, projects, potential, continue, and similar expressions may be intended to identify forward-looking statements.
Actual future results could differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors, including those discussed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations set forth below, and, in particular, the subsection entitled Risk Factors set forth therein, and in the Companys most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K. These factors include the fact that the economy generally, and the technology and storage segments specifically, have recently been in a state of uncertainty making it difficult to determine if past experience is a good guide to the future and making it impossible to determine if markets will grow or shrink in the short term. Recently, the Companys results have been significantly impacted by a widespread slowdown in technology investment that has also pressured the storage networking market that is the mainstay of the Companys business. A prolonged downturn in information technology spending could adversely affect the Companys revenues and results of operations. As a result of this uncertainty, the Company is unable to predict with any accuracy what future results might be. Other factors affecting these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following: slower than expected growth of the storage networking market or the failure of the Companys Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) customers to successfully incorporate the Companys products into their systems; the Companys dependence on a limited number of customers and the effects of the loss of, or decrease or delays in orders by, any such customers, or the failure of such customers to make payment; the timing and market acceptance of the Companys or the Companys OEM customers new or enhanced products; the Companys lack of backlog and the booking patterns of the Companys customers; the effects of terrorist activities and resulting political or economic instability; the highly competitive nature of the markets for the Companys products as well as pricing pressures that may result from such competitive conditions; the Companys ability and the ability of the Companys OEM customers to keep pace with the rapid technological changes in the Companys industry and gain market acceptance for new products and technologies; the effect of rapid migration of customers towards newer product platforms; possible transitions from board level to application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) solutions for selected applications; a shift in unit product mix from high end to midrange products; a decrease in the average unit selling prices or an increase in the manufactured cost of the Companys Fibre Channel products; delays in product development; the Companys reliance on third-party suppliers and subcontractors for components and assembly; any inadequacy of the Companys intellectual property protection or the potential for third-party claims of infringement; the Companys ability to attract and retain key technical personnel; the Companys dependence on foreign sales; the effect of acquisitions and changes in accounting standards.
Readers should carefully review these cautionary statements as they identify certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements and from historical trends and are in addition to other factors discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, in the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission or in materials incorporated therein by reference. The Company cautions the reader, however, that these lists of risk factors may not be exhaustive. The Company expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or changes to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect any future events or circumstances. References contained herein to Emulex, the Company, our and us refer to Emulex Corporation and its subsidiaries. References to dollar amounts are in thousands, except share and per-share data, unless otherwise specified.
Company Overview
Emulex Corporation is a leading designer, developer and supplier of a broad line of storage networking host bus adapters (HBAs) and application-specific computer chips (ASICs) that provide connectivity solutions for storage area networks (SANs), network attached storage (NAS), and redundant array of independent disks
11
(RAID) storage. HBAs are the data communication products that enable servers to connect to storage networks by offloading communication processing tasks as information is delivered and sent to the network. The Companys products are based on internally developed ASIC and embedded firmware and software technology, and offer support for a wide variety of SAN protocols, configurations, system interfaces and operating systems. Emulexs architecture offers customers a stable applications program interface (API), that has been preserved across multiple generations of adapters and to which many of the worlds leading OEMs have customized software for mission-critical server and storage system applications.
Recently, the majority of the Companys revenues have been comprised of products based on Fibre Channel technology. The Companys Fibre Channel development efforts began in 1992 and the Company shipped its first Fibre Channel product in volume in 1996. According to IDC and Dataquest, in calendar 2001 the Company was the worlds largest provider of Fibre Channel host bus adapters. In March 2001, the Company acquired Giganet, a leading developer of storage networking products based on Ethernet and Internet Protocol (IP) technologies. Effective July 2, 2001, Giganet was merged with and into Emulex Corporation, a California corporation that is the primary operating subsidiary of the Company. The Companys strategy with this acquisition is to leverage Giganets technology and extend the Companys market-leading HBA APIs into Internet Small Computer Systems Interface (iSCSI) and Virtual Interface (VI) based portions of the storage networking market. The Company has secured significant customer relationships with the worlds leading storage and server suppliers, including Dell, EMC, Fujitsu-Siemens, Groupe Bull, Hewlett-Packard, Hitachi Data Systems, IBM, NEC, Network Appliance and Unisys. In addition, the Company includes industry leaders Brocade, Intel, INRANGE, Legato, McDATA, Microsoft, and Veritas among its strategic partners. The Company markets to OEMs and end-users through its own worldwide selling organization, as well as to distribution partners. Corporate headquarters are located in Costa Mesa, California. As of September 29, 2002, the Company had a total of 356 employees.
Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.
Percentage of Net Revenues | ||||||||||
for the Three Months ended | ||||||||||
September 29, | September 30, | |||||||||
2002 | 2001 | |||||||||
Net revenues |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||
Cost of sales |
39.6 | 73.9 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
60.4 | 26.1 | ||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||
Engineering and development |
19.4 | 20.7 | ||||||||
Selling and marketing |
6.6 | 10.0 | ||||||||
General and administrative |
3.9 | 5.4 | ||||||||
Amortization of goodwill and other intangibles |
2.1 | 74.1 | ||||||||
Total operating expenses |
32.0 | 110.2 | ||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
28.4 | (84.1 | ) | |||||||
Nonoperating income |
43.5 | 5.2 | ||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
71.9 | (78.9 | ) | |||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
26.5 | (3.0 | ) | |||||||
Net income (loss) |
45.4 | % | (75.9 | )% | ||||||
12
Net Revenues
Net revenues for the first three months of fiscal 2003 ended September 29, 2002, were $70.4 million, an increase of $17.7 million, or 34 percent, from $52.7 million for the same three months of fiscal 2002 ended September 30, 2001. Net revenues for the three months ended September 29, 2002, consisted of $48.6 million from sales to OEMs, $21.7 million from sales through distribution channels and $0.1 million from sales directly to end-users. This represents an increase in OEM sales of $7.6 million, or 18 percent, an increase in distribution sales of $10.3 million, or 90 percent, and a decrease in end-user sales of $0.2 million, or 63 percent, compared to the same three months of fiscal 2002. A major factor in this shift from OEM to distribution net revenues is that beginning in the three months ended June 30, 2002, one of the Companys larger OEM customers began sourcing more product through distribution rather than purchasing it directly. The Company continues to believe net revenues in this market are being generated primarily from OEMs taking product directly and through other distribution channels. Additionally, the widespread slowdown in technology investment has affected the Companys OEM and distribution customers, both domestically and internationally, at different times and in varying degrees of severity.
From a product line perspective, net revenues generated from the Companys Fibre Channel products for the three months ended September 29, 2002, were $68.8 million, or 98 percent of total net revenues. This represents an increase of $17.2 million, or 33 percent, from the same three months of fiscal 2002. During the second half of fiscal 2001, the Company first experienced a downturn in Fibre Channel host bus adapter demand that continued into the three months ended September 30, 2001. The Company believes industry-wide decreases in end-user demand for technology solutions caused this downturn in demand. Although the Companys Fibre Channel revenues for the three months ended September 29, 2002, increased compared to the same three months of fiscal 2002, there is still a significant amount of uncertainty as to what stage of a recovery, if any, the market for technology solutions, and consequently, the Company, is experiencing. Net revenues from the Companys IP Storage Networking products, which were added to the Companys product offerings in the third quarter of fiscal 2001 with the acquisition of Giganet, were $1.6 million, or two percent of total net revenues for the three months ended September 29, 2002. This represents an increase of $0.9 million, or approximately 111 percent, compared to the same three months of fiscal 2002 due primarily to increased demand for the Companys Virtual Interface/Internet Protocol (VI/IP) products. Net revenues from the Companys traditional networking products were immaterial for the three months ended September 29, 2002, and $0.4 million, or one percent, of total net revenues for the same three months of fiscal 2002. This decrease in net revenues from the Companys traditional networking products was principally due to the planned discontinuance of the Companys efforts related to these products. The Companys traditional networking products entered end-of-life status in fiscal 2000 and the Company expects that these will contribute negligible, if any, revenues in future periods.
For the three months ended September 29, 2002, direct sales to IBM and Hewlett-Packard each separately accounted for 23 percent of the Companys total net revenues. Direct sales to no other customer accounted for more than 10 percent of total net revenues. Additionally, some of the Companys larger OEM customers purchased products indirectly through distributors, resellers or other third parties. Total net revenues, including direct sales to the Companys customers and their customer-specific models purchased indirectly through other distribution channels, amounted to 25 percent of the Companys total net revenues for IBM, 23 percent for Hewlett-Packard, and 18 percent for EMC for the three months ended September 29, 2002. For the same three months of fiscal 2002, direct sales to Hewlett-Packard and Compaq (if aggregated); IBM; and EMC accounted for 29 percent, 19 percent, and 11 percent of the Companys total net revenues, respectively. Direct sales to no other customer accounted for more than 10 percent of total net revenues during this period. Total net revenues, including direct sales to the Companys customers and their customer-specific models purchased indirectly through other distribution channels, amounted to 29 percent of the Companys total net revenues for Hewlett-Packard and Compaq (if aggregated); 24 percent for EMC; and 22 percent for IBM for the three months ended September 30, 2001. Direct sales to the Companys top five customers accounted for 67 percent of total net revenues for both the three months ended September 29, 2002, and the same three months of fiscal 2002. The Companys net revenues from its customers can be significantly impacted by changes in the business models of its customers. Beginning in the three months ended June 2002, EMC began sourcing more product through distribution rather than purchasing it directly. Consequently, direct sales to EMC could be impacted. Additionally, EMC has formed an alliance with Dell and entered into a worldwide manufacturing agreement with Dell. Consequently, some Emulex models previously sold under EMC-specific model numbers are now being sold under Dell-specific model numbers, and total net revenues for EMC, including direct sales to EMC and their customer-specific models purchased indirectly through other distribution channels, have been reduced as a result of this Dell alliance.
13
Domestic net revenues were $48.3 million, or 69 percent of total net revenues, for the three months ended September 29, 2002, and $33.8 million, or 64 percent of total net revenues for the same three months of fiscal 2002. International net revenues were $22.1 million, or 31 percent of total net revenues, for the three months ended September 29, 2002, and $19.0 million, or 36 percent of total net revenues for the same three months of fiscal 2002. The Company believes the increase in domestic net revenues of $14.5 million, or 43 percent, and the increase in international net revenues of $3.2 million, or 17 percent, are principally a function of the overall size of the market for Fibre Channel products and increased market acceptance of the Companys Fibre Channel products.
Gross Profit
Cost of sales included the cost of production of finished products as well as support costs and other expenses related to inventory management, manufacturing quality and order fulfillment. For the three months ended September 29, 2002, gross profit increased $28.8 million, or 209 percent, to $42.5 million from $13.8 million in the three months ended September 30, 2001. Gross margin increased to 60 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2002 compared to 26 percent in the comparable three months of fiscal 2002, primarily due to the comparable three months of fiscal 2002 including an excess and obsolete inventory charge of $13.6 million associated with older-generation one gigabit per second (Gbps) products. Starting in late September 2001, some of the Companys major customers made announcements that general economic conditions, exacerbated by the increase in economic uncertainty in the aftermath of the terrorist events of September 11, 2001, were having a negative impact on their financial results. The announcements made, and forecasts received, indicated deteriorating demand for the Companys one Gbps products as these customers were expected to migrate to two Gbps products for future purchases. As a result, the Company recorded an estimated excess and obsolete inventory charge totaling $13.6 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2002. Subsequently, as a result of generally improved demand exceeding prior estimates and the sale of products for which a reserve had been recorded, the Company recorded reductions of this excess and obsolete inventory charge. For the three months ended September 29, 2002 the reduction was $0.2 million. Excluding the reduction of the excess and obsolete inventory reserve of $0.2 million for the three months ended September 29, 2002, and the excess and obsolete charge of $13.6 million from the comparable three months of fiscal 2002, gross profit would have been $42.4 million and $27.4 million, respectively, and gross margin would have been 60 percent and 52 percent, respectively. The increase in gross profit and gross margin, excluding the inventory charge and subsequent reduction, for the three months ended September 29, 2002, compared to the same three months of fiscal 2002 was primarily due to cost reductions for Fibre Channel products, higher Fibre Channel net revenues, and changes in product mix. Additionally, cost of sales included $4 thousand and $17 thousand of amortized deferred compensation expense related to the acquisition of Giganet for the three months ended September 29, 2002, and September 30, 2001, respectively.
Engineering and Development
Engineering and development expenses consisted primarily of salaries and related expenses for personnel engaged in the design, development and technical support of the Companys products. These expenses included third-party fees paid to consultants, prototype development expenses and computer services costs related to supporting computer tools used in the design process. Engineering and development expenses were $13.7 million and $10.9 million for the three months ended September 29, 2002, and September 30, 2001, representing 19 and 21 percent of net revenues, respectively. Engineering and development expenses increased by $2.8 million, or 25 percent, for the three months ended September 29, 2002, compared to the same three months of fiscal 2002, due to the Companys increased investment in its Fibre Channel and Internet Protocol engineering and development, which included increased engineering and development headcount. Engineering and development expenses included $0.5 million of amortized deferred compensation expenses related to the acquisition of Giganet for both the three months ended September 29, 2002, and September 30, 2001. Due to the technical nature of the Companys products, engineering support is a critical part of the Companys strategy during both the development of its products and the support of its customers from product design through deployment into the market. Management intends to continue to make significant investments in the technical support and enhancement of the Companys current products, as well as the continued development of new products. Engineering expenses can fluctuate from quarter to quarter depending on several factors, including new product introduction schedules, hiring patterns and depreciation of capital equipment.
Selling and Marketing
Selling and marketing expenses consisted primarily of salaries, commissions and related expenses for personnel engaged in the marketing and sales of the Companys products, as well as trade shows, product literature,
14
promotional support costs and other advertising related costs. Selling and marketing expenses were $4.7 million and $5.3 million for the three months ended September 29, 2002, and September 30, 2001, representing seven and 10 percent of net revenues, respectively. Selling and marketing expenses decreased by $0.6 million, or 12 percent, for the three months ended September 29, 2002, compared to the same three months of fiscal 2002. This decrease was primarily due to lower selling and marketing headcount and decreased promotion and advertising costs. Selling and marketing expenses included $0.2 million and $0.3 million of amortized deferred compensation expense related to the acquisition of Giganet for the three months ended September 29, 2002, and September 30, 2001, respectively. Additionally, the Company recognized $63 thousand and $50 thousand of amortized deferred compensation expense for the three months ended September 29, 2002, and September 30, 2001, respectively, associated with a change to the United Kingdoms tax laws.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses consisted primarily of salaries and related expenses for executives, financial accounting support, human resources, administrative services, professional fees and other associated corporate expenses. General and administrative expenses were $2.7 million and $2.8 million for the three months ended September 29, 2002, and September 30, 2001, representing four and five percent of net revenues, respectively. General and administrative expenses remained essentially flat; decreasing by $0.1 million, or four percent, for the three months ended September 29, 2002, compared to the same three months of fiscal 2002, due to the Companys emphasis on operating expense controls. General and administrative expenses included $56 thousand and $60 thousand of amortized deferred compensation expenses related to the acquisition of Giganet for the three months ended September 29, 2002, and September 30, 2001, respectively.
Amortization of Goodwill and Other Intangibles
Amortization of goodwill and other intangibles included the amortization of intangible assets with estimable lives for the three months ended September 29, 2002. For the three months ended September 30, 2001, amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets included the amortization of goodwill and the amortization of other intangible assets with estimable lives. All intangible assets relate to the purchase of Giganet, completed during fiscal 2001. The amortization of intangibles was $1.5 million for the three months ended September 29, 2002, and amortization of goodwill and other intangibles was $39.1 million for the same three months of fiscal 2002, representing two and 74 percent of net revenues, respectively. For the three months ended September 29, 2002, the amortization consisted of amortization for core technology and patents of $1.5 million and $3 thousand for completed technology. For the comparable three months of fiscal 2002, the amortization consisted primarily of $37.4 million and $0.2 million for goodwill and assembled workforce, respectively; as well as $1.5 million for core technology and patents and $3 thousand for completed technology. The goodwill will be tested for impairment at least annually. The Company has completed its transitional goodwill impairment analysis under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement (Statement) 142 with no impairment charges resulting.
Nonoperating Income
Nonoperating income for the three months ended September 29, 2002, consisted primarily of a net gain on the repurchase of convertible subordinated notes and interest income partially offset by interest expense. The Companys nonoperating income increased $27.9 million to $30.6 million for the three months ended September 29, 2002, from $2.7 million for the same three months of fiscal 2002. The increase is due primarily to a $28.7 million gain from the repurchase of convertible subordinated notes during the three months ended September 29, 2002. Additionally, while lower interest rates caused lower interest percentage yields, the increase in the Companys invested funds caused an increase in interest income to $3.7 million for the three months ended September 29, 2002, from $2.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001. For the three months ended September 29, 2002, interest expense of $1.8 million associated with the Companys issuance of convertible subordinated notes during the second half of fiscal 2002 was included.
Income Taxes
For the three months ended September 29, 2002, the Company recorded a tax provision in the amount of $18.6 million or approximately 37 percent of income before income taxes. For the same three months of the prior fiscal year, the Company recorded a tax benefit in the amount of $1.6 million, or four percent of the loss before income taxes. The tax benefit for the same three months of fiscal 2002 was lower than the statutory federal tax rate primarily due to the non-deductibility of the goodwill amortization.
15
The Company is undergoing examination by the Internal Revenue Service of its 1998 U.S. tax return. In the opinion of management, this examination will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
New Accounting Standards
In July 2002, the FASB issued Statement 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. Statement 146 requires the recognition of costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. Examples of costs covered by Statement 146 include lease termination costs and certain employee severance costs that are associated with a restructuring, discontinued operations, plant closing or other exit or disposal activities. Statement 146 is effective prospectively for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002, with earlier adoption encouraged. The Company believes the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of the financial statements requires estimation and judgment that affect the reported amounts of net revenues, expenses, assets, and liabilities. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances and which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, and potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions.
The Company has identified the following as critical accounting policies: revenue recognition; allowance for doubtful accounts; goodwill, other intangibles, and long-lived assets; inventories; income taxes; and stock-based compensation.
Revenue Recognition. The Companys revenue recognition policies are in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commissions Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101. The Company recognizes revenue at the time of shipment when title and risk of loss have passed, evidence of an arrangement has been obtained, and collectibility has been reasonably assured. The Company makes certain sales through two-tier distribution channels and has various agreements with certain of its distributors and Master Value Added Resellers (collectively the Distributors). These agreements may be terminated upon written notice by either party. Additionally, these Distributors are generally given privileges to return a portion of inventory and to participate in price protection and cooperative marketing programs. Therefore, the Company recognizes revenues on standard products to its Distributors based on data received from the Distributors and managements estimates to approximate the point that these products have been resold by the Distributors. Additionally, the Company maintains appropriate accruals and allowances for these programs.
For products with software upgrade rights, the Company applies the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position, or SOP, 97-2, as amended by SOP 98-9. Under SOP 97-2, as amended by SOP 98-9, revenue is recognized from software licenses, provided the software has been delivered to the customer, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price charged to the customer is fixed or determinable at fair value and there are no significant Company obligations related to the sale, and the resulting receivable is deemed collectible, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts.
Furthermore, the Company provides a warranty of between one and five years on all products and provides a reserve for warranty costs at the time of shipment based upon actual historic experience.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon historical write-offs as a percentage of net revenues. Historically, the Company has not experienced significant losses on accounts receivable.
Goodwill, Other Intangibles, and Long-Lived Assets. Goodwill and other intangibles resulting from the acquisition of Giganet are carried at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated economic lives of the respective intangible assets, ranging from two to seven years. The Company adopted Statement 142 effective July 1, 2002, and no longer amortizes goodwill and other intangibles that have
16
indeterminate useful lives. The adoption of Statement 142 had a significant effect on the Companys results of operations. The Company has completed its transitional impairment analysis under Statement 142 and found no impairment upon the adoption of Statement 142 as of July 1, 2002. In accordance with Statement 142, goodwill and other intangibles that have indeterminate lives will be tested for impairment at least annually. Any impairment loss could materially and adversely affect the Companys results of operations.
The Company applies Statement 144, under which the recoverability of long-lived assets is assessed by determining whether the carrying value of an asset can be recovered through projected undiscounted future operating cash flows over its remaining life. The amount of impairment, if any, is measured based on fair value, which is determined using projected discounted future operating cash flows. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
Inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or net realizable value. The Company uses a standard cost system for purposes of determining cost. The standards are adjusted periodically to ensure they approximate actual cost. The Company regularly compares forecasted demand and the composition of the forecast for its products against inventory on hand and open purchase commitments to ensure the carrying value of inventory is at net realizable value. Accordingly, the Company may have to increase excess and obsolete inventory reserves as forecasted demand changes.
Income Taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method, which recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company regularly reviews historical and anticipated future pre-tax results of operations to determine whether the Company will be able to realize the benefit of net deferred tax assets.
Stock-Based Compensation. The Company accounts for its stock-based awards to employees using the intrinsic value method. Stock-based awards to non-employees are recorded using the fair value method. See Note 12 of the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Companys most recently filed Form 10-K for more information.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At September 29, 2002, the Company had $380.6 million in working capital, and $548.0 million in cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, current investments and long-term investments. At June 30, 2002, the Company had $558.2 million in working capital, and $631.8 million in cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, current investments and long-term investments. The Companys cash and cash equivalents decreased by $153.2 million from $282.6 million as of June 30, 2002, to $129.4 million as of September 29, 2002. This decrease in cash and cash equivalents was due to the Companys investing and financing activities, which used $71.7 million and $104.0 million of cash and cash equivalents, respectively. The use of cash by investing and financing activities was partially offset by operating activities, which provided $22.5 million of cash and cash equivalents.
Operating activities provided $22.5 million of cash and cash equivalents for the three months ended September 29, 2002. This increase in cash and cash equivalents was primarily from net income before non-cash activity. Such non-cash activity consisted primarily of the gain on the repurchase of convertible subordinated notes, deferred income taxes, depreciation and amortization of property and equipment, amortization of intangibles, stock-based compensation, and the tax benefit from the exercise of stock options. Additional increases in cash and cash equivalents were due to an increase in accounts payable, an increase in income taxes payable; and a decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets. These increases to net cash provided by operating activities were partially offset by an increase in accounts and other receivables, an increase in inventories, and a decrease in accrued liabilities. The increase in inventories of $3.5 million for the three months ended September 29, 2002, included the effect of the reduction of the excess and obsolete inventory reserve of $0.2 million associated with older generation one Gbps products. For the three months ended September 30, 2001, operating activities provided $9.4 million of cash and cash equivalents. This increase in cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities for the three months ended September 30, 2001, was primarily due to the Companys net income before non-cash activity such as the amortization of goodwill and other intangibles, stock-based compensation, and depreciation and amortization of property and equipment, as well as changes in other working capital balances. The changes in other working capital balances included the effect of an excess and obsolete charge of $13.6 million associated with older generation one Gbps products.
17
Investing activities; including primarily the purchases of investments of $228.8 million, maturities of investments of $159.1 million, and additions to property and equipment of $2.4 million; used $71.7 million of cash and cash equivalents for the three months ended September 29, 2002. For the same three months of fiscal 2002, investing activities; which included purchases of investments of $119.3 million, maturities of investments of $123.1 million, and additions to property and equipment of $2.3 million; provided $1.4 million of cash and cash equivalents.
Financing activities used $104.0 million of cash and cash equivalents for the three months ended September 29, 2002. This decrease in cash and cash equivalents was primarily due to the Companys repurchase of approximately $136.5 million of convertible subordinated notes at a discount to face value, spending $104.2 million. This decrease in cash and cash equivalents was offset by $0.2 million of proceeds from the issuance of common stock under stock option plans. For the three months ended September 30, 2001, financing activities, which were limited to the repurchase of common stock partially offset by the net proceeds from the exercise of stock options, used $10.3 million of cash and cash equivalents. The Companys Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of up to four million common shares over the two years beginning in September 2001. The repurchase plan authorizes the Company to make repurchases in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions with the timing and terms of any purchase to be determined by management based on market conditions. During the first quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company repurchased one million common shares and did not subsequently repurchase any more shares during 2002, or during the three months ended September 29, 2002. During the three months ended September 29, 2002, the Companys Board of Directors expanded the Companys repurchase program to include the repurchase of the Companys convertible subordinated notes as well as shares of the Companys common stock. The combined program authorized the repurchase of up to four million shares of common stock, leaving three million common shares authorized for repurchase at September 29, 2002, and up to an additional $125.0 million to be spent on the repurchase of convertible subordinated notes, leaving $20.8 million authorized for repurchase at September 29, 2002.
On January 23, 2002, the Company announced a private placement of $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 1.75 percent convertible subordinate notes due February 1, 2007. Interest is payable in cash on February 1 and August 1 of each year, beginning August 1, 2002. In addition, the Company granted the initial purchasers of the notes a 30-day option, which they exercised, to purchase an additional $45.0 million principal amount of the notes. These notes may be converted by the holder at any time into shares of the Companys common stock at the conversion price of $53.84 per share, subject to the potential adjustments described in the terms of the notes issued. The Company may redeem the notes on or after February 5, 2005, in whole or in part. The Company incurred associated issuance costs of approximately $11.0 million. The $345.0 million transaction closed on January 29, 2002. The Company expects to use the net proceeds for general corporate purposes, including working capital and potential acquisitions. The Company currently has no understanding or agreements with respect to any acquisitions, and no assurance can be given that such transactions will be completed. Pending use of the net proceeds, the Company plans to invest the net proceeds in interestbearing, investment grade securities and money-market instruments.
As noted above, in August 2002 the Company bought back approximately $136.5 million of its convertible subordinated notes at a discount to face value, spending $104.2 million. The repurchased notes were cancelled, leaving convertible subordinated notes outstanding with a face value of $208.5 million, which, if converted, would result in the issuance of approximately 3.9 million shares. The resulting net pre-tax gain of approximately $28.7 million from the repurchase of the convertible subordinated notes was recorded for the three months ended September 29, 2002.
The Company was previously required to enter into an end-of-life purchase agreement for a key inventory component as the sole-source manufacturer of this component announced their discontinued manufacturing of the component. As of September 29, 2002, the Companys remaining purchase obligation was $10.4 million.
In 2002, the Company entered into an agreement to relocate its headquarters locally in Costa Mesa, California. The Company will finance the build to suit construction phase of the approximately 180 thousand square feet facility with its own capital, before beginning a 10-year lease term with an option to buy the land and buildings during the first six months of the lease term. If the Company does not exercise its option to purchase the facility, the landlord will obtain permanent financing and reimburse the Company for the construction costs. The Company believes the total cost would be less than $40.0 million if purchased. The Companys total gross undiscounted financial commitment for the 10-year lease term would be approximately $46.0 million. At September 29, 2002, the Company had restricted cash of $1.7 million associated with the construction of the headquarters.
18
As part of the Companys commitment to storage networking product development, including Fibre Channel and IP Networking, the Company expects to continue its investments in property and equipment, most notably for additional engineering equipment, continued enhancement of the Companys global IT infrastructure, and the local relocation of its Costa Mesa, California facility. The Company believes that its existing cash and cash equivalents balances, facilities and equipment leases, investments, and anticipated cash flows from operating activities will be sufficient to support its working capital needs and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months.
The following summarizes the Companys contractual obligations at September 29, 2002, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on the Companys liquidity and cash flow in future periods:
Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 1 year: | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Remaining | 1-3 | 4-5 | After 5 | |||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | nine months) | years | years | years | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 224,939 | $ | 1,825 | $ | 7,298 | $ | 215,816 | $ | | ||||||||||
Operating leases |
6,821 | 2,224 | 3,636 | 940 | 21 | |||||||||||||||
Non-cancelable purchase obligations |
10,408 | 10,408 | | | | |||||||||||||||
New corporate headquarters lease option |
46,259 | | 9,270 | 9,037 | 27,952 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 288,427 | $ | 14,457 | $ | 20,204 | $ | 225,793 | $ | 27,973 | ||||||||||
Risk Factors
A prolonged downturn in information technology spending in general or spending on high-performance computer and storage systems in particular could adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.
The demand for our Fibre Channel products, which represented 98 percent of our revenues for the three months ended September 29, 2002, has been supported by the demand for sophisticated networking and data storage solutions that support enterprise computing requirements, including on-line transaction processing, data mining, data warehousing, multimedia and Internet applications. Since the beginning of calendar 2001, the global economy has experienced a significant slowdown that has been exacerbated by the terrorist attacks on the United States and the resulting economic and political uncertainty throughout the world. Such downturn has resulted in substantial reductions in demand for networking, data storage and other information technology solutions and products. We are unable to predict the duration or depth of such downturn in technology spending. In the event that such downturn grows more severe or continues for an extended period of time, our business, results of operations, and financial condition may be adversely affected. The adverse effects of any sustained downturn in information technology spending on our operating results may be exacerbated by our research and development investments, strategic investments and merger and acquisition activity, as well as customer service and support, which are expected to continue despite any such downturn.
Our business depends upon the continued development and growth of the storage networking market, and our business will be adversely affected if such development does not occur or occurs more slowly than we anticipate.
The size of our potential market is dependent upon the broad acceptance of our storage networking technologies as alternatives to other technologies traditionally utilized for network and storage communications. The storage networking market, while rapidly evolving and attracting an increasing number of market participants, is still at an early stage of deployment. We believe that our investment in the storage networking market represents our greatest opportunity for revenue growth and profitability in the future. However, we cannot be certain that storage networking products will gain broader market acceptance or that customers will choose our technology and products. Additionally, since our products are sold as parts of integrated systems, our products demand is driven by the demand for these integrated systems, including other companies complementary products. A lack of demand for the integrated systems or a lack of complementary products required for these integrated systems could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. If the storage networking market fails to develop, develops more slowly than anticipated, attracts more competitors than we expect, as discussed below, or if our products do not achieve market acceptance, our business, results of operations, and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.
19
We have secured numerous design wins for our storage networking products from OEM customers. If our customers are unable to or otherwise do not ship systems that incorporate our products, or if their shipped systems were not commercially successful, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.
Because a significant portion of our revenues are generated from sales to a limited number of customers, none of which are the subject of exclusive or long-term contracts, the loss of one or more of these customers could adversely affect our business.
We rely almost exclusively on OEMs and sales through distribution channels for our revenue. For the three months ended September 29, 2002, we derived approximately 69 percent of our net revenues from OEMs and 31 percent from sales through distribution. We cannot be certain that we will retain our current OEM and distributor customers or that we will be able to recruit additional or replacement customers. As is common in an emerging technology industry, our agreements with OEMs and distributors are typically non-exclusive, have no volume commitments, and often may be terminated by either party without cause. Indeed, many of our OEM and distributor customers carry or utilize competing product lines. If we were to suddenly lose one or more important OEM or distributor customers to a competitor, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
For the three months ended September 29, 2002, direct sales to IBM and Hewlett-Packard each separately accounted for 23 percent of our total net revenues. Direct sales to our top five customers accounted for 67 percent of total net revenues for both the three months ended September 29, 2002, and the same three months of fiscal 2002. Additionally, some of our larger OEM customers purchased products indirectly through distributors, resellers or other third parties. Total net revenues, including direct sales to our customers and their customer-specific models purchased indirectly through other distribution channels, amounted to 25 percent of our total net revenues for IBM; 23 percent for Hewlett-Packard and 18 percent for EMC in fiscal 2002.
Recently, Compaq and Hewlett-Packard consummated their merger. Although we cannot predict the effects of such merger on our business, to the extent that such merger results in decreased demand or margins for our products, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
Although we have attempted to expand our base of customers, we believe our revenues in the future will continue to be similarly derived from a limited number of customers, especially given the consolidation the industry has recently experienced. As a result, to the extent that sales to any of our significant customers are reduced or impaired, our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
Our operating results are difficult to forecast and our stock price may decline if our results fail to meet expectations.
Our revenues and results of operations have varied on a quarterly basis in the past and may vary significantly in the future. Accordingly, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations are not necessarily meaningful, and you should not rely on such comparisons as indications of our future performance. There can be no assurance that we will maintain our current levels of profitability in the future. Our revenues and results of operations are difficult to forecast and could be adversely affected by many factors, including, among others:
| Changes in the size, timing and terms of OEM and other customer orders; | ||
| The timing and market acceptance of new or enhanced product introductions by us, our OEM customers and our competitors; | ||
| Changes in desired inventory levels of our significant customers; | ||
| Changes in the sales and deployment cycles for our products, particularly those sold through our OEM sales channels; | ||
| The gain or loss of significant OEMs or other customers; | ||
| Changes in the mix of product sales or the mix of sales channels; |
20
| Changes in general economic conditions, including slower than expected market growth, and resulting changes in customer technology budgeting and spending; | ||
| The ability of our contract manufacturers to produce and distribute our products in a timely fashion; | ||
| Component shortages experienced by us, or reduced demand from our customers if our customers are unable to acquire the components used in conjunction with our products in their deployments; | ||
| Changes in our accounting or other policies resulting from the adoption of new laws, regulations or pronouncements; | ||
| Changes in technology, industry standards or consumer preferences; | ||
| Fluctuations in product development and other operating expenses; | ||
| Seasonality; | ||
| Difficulties with updates, changes or additions to our Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System; and/or | ||
| Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. |
As a result of these and other unexpected factors or developments, it is possible that our future operating results will be below the expectations of investors or market analysts which could have a material adverse effect on our stock price.
Unfilled orders and our tendency to generate a large percentage of our quarterly sales at the end of the quarter contributes to possible quarterly fluctuations in our operating results which could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and stock price.
Historically, we have generally shipped products quickly after we receive orders, meaning that we do not always have a significant backlog of unfilled orders. As a result, our revenues in a given quarter may depend substantially on orders booked in that quarter. Alternatively, orders already in backlog may be deferred or cancelled. Also, we have typically generated a large percentage of our quarterly revenues in the last month of the quarter. Our customers may change their accounting practices and purchasing patterns, thus reducing our ability to predict our quarterly sales. We may use blanket purchase orders with some customers, with customer-provided forecasts and customer controlled just-in-time pulls of products from hub warehouses, thus reducing our ability to predict our quarterly sales. As a result of these and other factors, we may not be able to accurately predict our quarterly sales. Because our expense levels are partially based on our expectations of future sales, in the event we experience unexpected decreases in quarterly sales, our expenses may be disproportionately large relative to our revenues and we may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected revenue shortfall. Any shortfall in sales in relation to our quarterly expectations or any delay of customer orders would likely have an immediate and adverse impact on our results of operations and may adversely affect our stock price.
A significant decrease or delay in orders from one or more of our customers could adversely affect our business.
We experienced a downturn in Fibre Channel host bus adapter demand first evidenced by order deferrals experienced and disclosed by us in early February of calendar 2001. In the event such deferrals were to occur again, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
The failure of one or more of our significant customers to make payments could adversely affect our business.
We are subject to credit risk associated with the concentration of our accounts receivable from our customers. Our days sales outstanding, or DSOs, were 39 days and 37 days at September 29, 2002, and June 30, 2002, respectively. There can be no assurance they will remain at this level or improve. If one of our current significant customers were to declare bankruptcy or if we were to lose one of our current significant customers and did not receive their payments due to us, we could experience a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
21
Some of our suppliers or our OEM customers could become competitors.
Some of our suppliers and our OEM customers currently have or could develop products internally that would replace or compete with our products and technology. To the extent that our customers or suppliers are successful in developing and marketing competitive solutions, the resulting reductions in sales of our products could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our markets are highly competitive and our business and results of operations may be adversely affected by entry of new competitors into the markets, aggressive pricing, and the introduction or expansion of competitive products and technologies.
The markets for our products are highly competitive and are characterized by rapid technological advances, price erosion, frequent new product introductions and evolving industry standards. Our current and potential competition consists of major domestic and international companies, many of which have substantially greater financial, technical, marketing and distribution resources than we have. We also expect that an increasing number of companies will enter the markets for our storage networking products. Furthermore, larger companies in other related industries may develop or acquire technologies and apply their significant resources, such as distribution channels and brand recognition, to acquire significant market share. Emerging companies attempting to obtain a share of the existing markets act as potential competition as well. Additionally, our competitors continue to introduce products with improved price/performance characteristics, and we will have to do the same to remain competitive. We expect that large forecasts of market size growth will attract competition. As the market grows and matures, customers may qualify multiple sources for OEM or standard products, thus introducing competition into our existing customer accounts. Increased competition could result in significant price competition, reduced revenues, lower profit margins or loss of market share, any of which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Alternative existing technologies such as SCSI compete with our Fibre Channel and IP storage networking technologies for customers. Our success depends in part on our own ability and on the ability of our OEM customers to develop storage networking solutions that are competitive with these alternative legacy technologies. Some SCSI technology companies, which include Adaptec, LSI Logic and QLogic, already have well-established relationships with our current and potential customers, have extensive knowledge of the markets we serve and may have better name recognition and more extensive development, sales and marketing resources than we have. Additionally, in the future, other technologies that we are not currently developing may evolve to address the applications served by Fibre Channel today.
We have experienced losses in our history which may adversely affect our stock price and financial condition.
We have experienced losses in our history, most recently a net loss of $96.2 million in fiscal 2002, and $23.6 million in fiscal 2001. The net loss in fiscal 2002 included $156.2 million of amortization of goodwill and other intangibles related to the acquisition of Giganet, Inc. and a net excess and obsolete inventory charge of $10.1 million. The net loss in fiscal 2001 included $22.3 million of in-process research and development expenses and $52.1 million of amortization of goodwill and other intangibles related to the acquisition of Giganet, Inc. We had been amortizing goodwill and other intangibles related to the acquisition of Giganet, Inc. over periods of two to seven years. Beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2003, when we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 142, or Statement 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, we no longer amortize goodwill and other intangibles that have indeterminate useful lives. Any losses may adversely affect the perception of our business by analysts and investors which could adversely affect our stock price. While our recent losses have not been accompanied by negative cash flow from operations, to the extent that we are unable to generate positive operating profits, our financial condition may be materially adversely affected.
Our industry is subject to rapid technological change, and we must keep pace with the changes to successfully compete.
The markets for our products are characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards and the frequent introduction of new products and enhancements. Our future success depends in a large part on our ability to enhance our existing products and to introduce new products on a timely basis to meet changes in customer preferences and evolving industry standards. Currently, new technologies and proposed new technologies such as 10
22
gigabit per second, or Gbps, optics; Infiniband; PCI-X; PCI Express; iSCSI; SCSI over IP, or SOIP; VI; RDMA; and iWarp; are still in development by many companies and it is impossible to know what the end technology will provide. We cannot be certain that we will be successful in developing, manufacturing and marketing new products or product enhancements that respond to such changes in a timely manner and achieve market acceptance. We also cannot be certain that we will be able to develop the underlying core technologies necessary to create new products and enhancements, or that we will be able to license the core technologies with commercially reasonable terms from third parties. In addition, a key element of our current business strategy is to develop ASICs in order to increase system performance and reduce manufacturing costs, thereby enhancing the price/performance of our storage networking products. We cannot be certain that we will be successful at developing and incorporating ASICs effectively and in a timely manner. If we are unable, for technological or other reasons, to develop new products, enhance or sell existing products, or consume existing products in a timely and cost-effective manner in response to technological and market changes, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.
The migration of our customers towards newer product platforms may have a significant adverse effect on our results of operations, including charges for obsolete inventory.
As our customers migrate from one platform to the enhanced price/performance of the next platform, we may experience reduced revenue, gross profit and gross margin levels associated with lower average selling prices and higher relative product costs associated with improved performance. Also, economic conditions during platform migration periods can have a significant impact on results. This was evidenced in late September 2001, as some of our major customers made announcements that general economic conditions, exacerbated by the increase in economic uncertainty in the aftermath of the terrorist events of September 11, 2001, were having a negative impact on their financial results. The announcements made, and forecasts received, indicated deteriorating demand for our one Gbps products as these customers were expected to migrate to two Gbps products for future purchases. As a result, we recorded a net inventory charge of $10.1 million in 2002. As with all inventory, we regularly compare forecasted demand for our one Gbps products against inventory on hand and open purchase commitments. Accordingly, we may have to increase excess and obsolete inventory reserves as forecasted demand changes.
The failure of our OEM customers to keep up with rapid technological change could adversely affect our business.
Our revenues depend significantly upon the ability and willingness of our OEM customers to develop, promote and deliver, on a timely basis, products that incorporate our technology. OEMs must commit significant resources to develop a product that incorporates our technology or solutions. The ability and willingness of OEM customers to develop, promote and deliver such products are significantly influenced by a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control. We cannot be certain of the ability or willingness of our OEM customers to continue developing, marketing and selling products that incorporate our technology or solutions. Our business is dependent on our relationships with our OEM and distributor customers, so the inability or unwillingness of any of our significant customers to develop or promote products that use our technology or solutions would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Rapid changes in the evolution of technology, including the unexpected extent or timing of the transition from HBA solutions to lower-priced ASIC solutions, could adversely affect our business.
Historically, the electronics industry has developed higher performance ASICs that create chip level solutions that replace selected board level solutions at a significantly lower average selling price. We have previously offered ASICs to certain customers for certain applications which has effectively resulted in a lower-priced solution when compared to an HBA solution. We anticipate that this transition will occur for our products in certain applications as well. If this transition is more abrupt or is more widespread than anticipated, there can be no assurance that we will be able to modify our business model in a timely manner, if at all, in order to mitigate the effects of this transition on our business, results of operations and financial position.
Rapid shifts in customer purchases from our high-end server and storage solutions to midrange server and storage solutions could adversely affect our business.
Historically, the majority of our Fibre Channel revenues have come from our high-end server and storage solutions. In recent quarters, an increasing percentage of revenues have come from midrange server and storage solutions,
23
which typically have lower average selling prices than our high-end server and storage solutions. If this trend were to be more abrupt or more widespread than anticipated, there can be no assurance that we will be able to modify our business model in a timely manner, if at all, in order to mitigate the effect of this trend on our business, results of operations and financial position.
A decrease in the average unit selling prices or an increase in the manufactured cost of our Fibre Channel products could adversely affect our gross margins and financial performance.
Since we introduced our first Fibre Channel products, we have experienced downward pressure on their average unit selling prices. We may provide stair step pricing discounts to customers based upon volume purchase criteria, and achievement of such discounts may reduce our average unit selling prices. Although historically we have achieved offsetting cost reductions, to the extent that average unit selling prices of our Fibre Channel products decrease without a corresponding decrease in the costs of such products, our gross margins and financial performance could be materially adversely affected. Furthermore, if the manufactured cost of our products were to increase due to inflation or other factors, our gross margins and financial performance could be materially adversely affected.
Delays in product development could adversely affect our business.
We have experienced delays in product development in the past and may experience similar delays in the future. Given the short product life cycles in the markets for our products and the relatively long product development cycles, any delay or unanticipated difficulty associated with new product introductions or product enhancements could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Prior delays have resulted from numerous factors, such as:
| Changing OEM product specifications; | ||
| Difficulties in hiring and retaining necessary personnel; | ||
| Difficulties in reallocating engineering resources and other resource limitations; | ||
| Difficulties with independent contractors; | ||
| Changing market or competitive product requirements; | ||
| Unanticipated engineering or manufacturing complexity; | ||
| Undetected errors or failures in software and hardware; and | ||
| Delays in the acceptance or shipment of products by OEM customers. |
Our joint development activities may result in products that are not commercially successful or that are not available in a timely fashion.
We have engaged in joint development projects with third parties in the past and we expect to continue doing so in the future. Joint development creates several risks for us, including the loss of control over development of aspects of the jointly-developed products and over the timing of product availability. Accordingly, we face the risk that joint development activities will result in products that are not commercially successful or that are not available in a timely fashion.
The loss of third-party suppliers or our contract manufacturers could adversely affect our business.
We rely on third-party suppliers for components that are used in our products, and we have experienced delays or difficulty in securing components in the past. Delays or difficulty in securing components may be caused by numerous factors including, but not limited to:
| Discontinued production by a vendor; | ||
| Undetected errors or failures; |
24
| Natural disasters; | ||
| Disruption in shipping channels; | ||
| Difficulties associated with foreign operations; and | ||
| Market shortages. |
Additionally, key components that we use in our products may only be available from single sources with which we do not have contracts. For example, Intel is currently our sole supplier for some microprocessors and bridge chips used in our products, while IBM is the sole supplier of a bridge chip used in some of our other dual channel Fibre Channel products. In addition, we design our own ASICs that are embedded in our products, and these are manufactured by third-party semiconductor foundries such as LSI Logic and QuickLogic. In addition to hardware, we design software to provide functionality to our hardware products. In the past, we have also licensed software from third party providers for use with our traditional networking products, and most of these providers are the sole source for the software. However, both our software and the third party software are sold as embedded programs within the hardware products. The loss of one or more of our sole suppliers or third party foundries could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, an announcement made by one of our sole suppliers or third party foundries that they intend to stop producing a component in the future could cause us, based on forecasted demand that may or may not materialize, to enter into a long-term purchase commitment or make a last-time purchase that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Because we outsource the production of our products to contract manufacturers, Suntron Corporation and MSL, we only manage the supply of a small number of our product components. Suntron manufactures for us within the United States, while MSL manufactures for us in both the United States and in Europe at their Global Manufacturing Services production facility in Valencia, Spain. Currently, we rely upon Suntron and MSL to complete the majority of the component purchases for our products. Consequently, we cannot be certain that the necessary components will be available to meet our future requirements at favorable prices, if at all.
In July 2002, MSL notified us that they will be closing their facility within the United States that manufactured our products. As a result, the facility has been closed and we are transitioning a portion of the manufacturing of our products to an alternative MSL facility within the United States. We cannot predict the impact this move will have on us, but if we were to experience significant delays in product qualifications, completing production runs, or shipping product as a result of this move, and we were unable to compensate for this disruption elsewhere, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, because we rely upon Suntron and MSL to manufacture, store and ship our products, the manufacturing and sale of our products would be temporarily suspended if either Suntron or MSL, or both, are unable or unwilling to complete production runs for us in the future, or experience any significant delays in completing production runs or shipping product. An interruption in supply of our products and the cost of qualifying and shifting production to an alternative manufacturing and distribution facility could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, we rely upon the financial stability of our contract manufacturers, and their ability and willingness to continue as our contract manufacturers.
The inadequacy of our intellectual property protections could adversely affect our business.
We believe that our continued success depends primarily on continuing innovation, marketing and technical expertise, as well as the quality of product support and customer relations. At the same time, our success is partially dependent on the proprietary technology contained in our products. We currently rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secret laws and contractual provisions to establish and protect our intellectual property rights in our products. For a more complete description of our intellectual property, you should read BusinessIntellectual Property in our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We cannot be certain that the steps we take to protect our intellectual property will adequately protect our proprietary rights, that others will not independently develop or otherwise acquire equivalent or superior technology, or that we can maintain such technology as trade secrets. In addition, the laws of some of the countries in which our products are or may be developed, manufactured or sold may not protect our products and intellectual property rights
25
to the same extent as the laws of the United States or at all. Our failure to protect our intellectual property rights could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Third-party claims of intellectual property infringement could adversely affect our business.
We believe that our products and technology do not infringe on the intellectual property rights of others or upon intellectual property rights that may be granted in the future pursuant to pending applications. We occasionally receive communications from third parties alleging patent infringement, and there is always the chance that third parties may assert infringement claims against us. Any such claims, with or without merit, could result in costly litigation, cause product shipment delays or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements, which may or may not be available. However, we have in the past obtained, and may be required in the future to obtain, licenses of technology owned by other parties. We cannot be certain that the necessary licenses will be available or that they can be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. If we were to fail to obtain such royalty or licensing agreements in a timely manner and on reasonable terms, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.
The inability to attract or the loss of key managerial and technical personnel could adversely affect our business.
Our success depends to a significant degree upon the performance and continued service of key managers as well as engineers involved in the development of our storage networking technologies and technical support of our storage networking products and customers. Our future success depends upon our ability to attract, train and retain such personnel. We may need to increase the number of key managers as well as technical staff members with experience in high-speed networking applications as we further develop our storage networking product lines. Competition for such highly skilled employees in our local community as well as our industry is intense, and we cannot be certain that we will be successful in recruiting and retaining such personnel. In addition, employees may leave our company and subsequently compete against us. If we are unable to attract new managerial and technical employees, or are unable to retain our current key managerial and technical employees, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Our international business activities subject us to risks that could adversely affect our business.
For the three months ended September 29, 2002, sales in the United States accounted for 69 percent of our total net revenues, sales in Europe accounted for 24 percent of our total net revenues, and sales in the Pacific Rim countries accounted for seven percent of our total net revenues. We expect that sales in the United States and Europe will continue to account for the substantial majority of our net revenues for the foreseeable future. All of our sales are currently denominated in U.S. dollars. As a result, if the value of the U.S. dollar increases relative to foreign currencies, our products could become less competitive in international markets. Additionally, some of our products are produced at a MSL production facility in Valencia, Spain and as a result we are subject to the risks inherent in international operations. Our international business activities could be affected, limited or disrupted by a variety of factors, including:
| The imposition of governmental controls and regulatory requirements; | ||
| The costs and risks of localizing products for foreign countries; | ||
| Longer accounts receivable payment cycles; | ||
| Changes in the value of local currencies relative to our functional currency; | ||
| Trade restrictions; | ||
| Changes in tariffs; | ||
| General economic and social conditions within foreign countries; and | ||
| Political instability or terrorism. |
26
In addition, the revenues we earn in various countries in which we do business may be subject to taxation by more than one jurisdiction, thereby adversely affecting our earnings. All of these factors could harm future sales of our products to international customers or future overseas production of our products, and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Export restrictions may adversely affect our business.
Our products are subject to U.S. Department of Commerce export control restrictions. Neither our customers nor we may export such products without obtaining an export license. These U.S. export laws also prohibit the export of our products to a number of countries deemed by the United States to be hostile. These restrictions may make foreign competitors facing less stringent controls on their products more competitive in the global market than we or our customers are. The U.S. government may not approve any pending or future export license requests. In addition, the list of products and countries for which export approval is required, and the regulatory policies with respect thereto, could be revised. The sale of our products could be harmed by our failure or the failure of our customers to obtain the required licenses or by the costs of compliance.
We may need additional capital in the future and such additional financing may not be available on favorable terms.
While we believe we have adequate working capital to meet our expected cash requirements for the immediate future, we may need to raise additional funds through public or private debt or equity financings in order to:
| Take advantage of unanticipated opportunities, including more rapid international expansion or acquisitions of complementary businesses or technologies; | ||
| Develop new products or services; | ||
| Repay outstanding indebtedness; or | ||
| Respond to unanticipated competitive pressures. |
We cannot assure you that any additional financing we may need will be available on terms favorable to us, or at all. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to take advantage of unanticipated opportunities, develop new products or services or otherwise respond to unanticipated competitive pressures. In any such case, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
In January 2002, we completed a $345.0 million private placement of convertible subordinated notes, which are due February 1, 2007. Subsequently, during the three months ended September 29, 2002, we repurchased and cancelled approximately $136.5 million face value of such notes. To the extent that we utilize the proceeds of such private placement in a manner that results in us not having sufficient liquidity and capital resources to repay the principal amounts of the notes when due, we may be forced to raise additional funds through public or private debt or equity financings, which may not be available on favorable terms, if at all. If such financings were not available on favorable terms, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Potential acquisitions or strategic investments may be more costly or less profitable than anticipated and may adversely affect the price of our company stock.
We may pursue acquisitions or strategic investments that could provide new technologies, products or service offerings. Future acquisitions or strategic investments may involve the use of significant amounts of cash, potentially dilutive issuances of equity or equity-linked securities, incurrence of debt and amortization of intangible assets with determinable lives. Moreover, to the extent that any proposed acquisition or strategic investment is not favorably received by stockholders, analysts and others in the investment community, the price of our common stock could be adversely affected. In addition, acquisitions or strategic investments involve numerous risks, including:
| Difficulties in the assimilation of the operations, technologies, products and personnel of the acquired company; |
27
| The diversion of managements attention from other business concerns; | ||
| Risks of entering markets in which we have no or limited prior experience; and | ||
| The potential loss of key employees of the acquired company. |
In the event that an acquisition or strategic investment does occur and we are unable to obtain anticipated profits or successfully integrate operations, technologies, products or personnel that we acquire, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Our stock price is volatile, which has and may result in lawsuits against us and our officers and directors.
The stock market in general and the stock prices in technology-based companies in particular have experienced extreme volatility that often has been unrelated to the operating performance of any specific public company. The market price of our common stock has fluctuated in the past and is likely to fluctuate in the future as well. Factors which could have a significant impact on the market price of our common stock include, but are not limited to, the following:
| Quarterly variations in operating results; | ||
| Announcements of new products by us or our competitors; | ||
| The gain or loss of significant customers; | ||
| Changes in analysts earnings estimates; | ||
| Changes in analyst recommendations, price targets or other parameters that may not be related to earnings estimates; | ||
| Rumors or dissemination of false information; | ||
| Pricing pressures; | ||
| Short selling of our common stock; | ||
| Dilution resulting from conversion of outstanding convertible subordinated notes into shares of our common stock; | ||
| General conditions in the computer, storage or communications markets; or | ||
| Events affecting other companies that investors deem to be comparable to us. |
In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been the object of securities class action litigation. In this regard, we and certain of our officers and directors were named as defendants in a number of securities class action lawsuits filed in the United States District Court, Central District of California. The plaintiffs in the actions purport to represent purchasers of our common stock during various periods ranging from January 18, 2001, through February 9, 2001. The complaints allege that we and certain of our officers and directors made misrepresentations and omissions in violation of sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The complaints generally seek compensatory damages, costs and attorneys fees in an unspecified amount. In addition, we have received inquiries about events giving rise to the lawsuits from the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Nasdaq Stock Market. While we believe that the lawsuits are without legal merit and intend to defend them vigorously, it is not possible to predict whether we will incur any material liability in connection with such lawsuits. See Part II Item 1 Legal Proceedings for a more complete discussion of such litigation.
28
Terrorist activities and resulting military and other actions could adversely affect our business.
The terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, D.C. in September 2001 disrupted commerce throughout the United States and Europe. The continued threat of terrorism within the United States and Europe and the military action and heightened security measures in response to such threat may cause significant disruption to commerce throughout the world. To the extent that such disruptions result in delays or cancellations of customer orders, delays in collecting cash, a general decrease in corporate spending on information technology, or our inability to effectively market, manufacture or ship our products, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. We are unable to predict whether the threat of terrorism or the responses thereto will result in any long-term commercial disruptions or if such activities or responses will have any long-term material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Our corporate offices and principal product development facilities are located in a region that is subject to earthquakes and other natural disasters.
Our California facilities, including our corporate offices and principal product development facilities, are located near major earthquake faults. Any personal injury or damage to the facilities in excess of our currently insured amounts as a result of earthquakes or other such natural disasters could have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our shareholder rights plan, certificate of incorporation and Delaware law could adversely affect the performance of our stock.
Our shareholder rights plan and provisions of our certificate of incorporation and of the Delaware General Corporation Law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders. The shareholder rights plan and these provisions of our certificate of incorporation and Delaware law are intended to encourage potential acquirers to negotiate with us and allow our board of directors the opportunity to consider alternative proposals in the interest of maximizing stockholder value. However, such provisions may also discourage acquisition proposals or delay or prevent a change in control, which could harm our stock price. You should read Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K, our certificate of incorporation and Delaware law for more information on the anti-takeover effects of provisions of our shareholder rights plan.
The purchase accounting treatment of the acquisition of Giganet may result in an impairment loss.
The valuation of our acquisition of Giganet was approximately $689.0 million which initially resulted in our recording of approximately $642.0 million of goodwill and other intangibles related to the acquisition. We had been amortizing these intangibles over periods of two to seven years. Beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2003, when we adopted Statement 142, we no longer amortize goodwill and other intangibles that have indeterminate useful lives. In accordance with Statement 142, goodwill and other intangibles that have indeterminate lives will be tested for impairment at least annually. Any impairment loss could materially and adversely affect our results of operations. We currently have net goodwill related to the Giganet acquisition in the amount of $397.3 million.
Our products are complex and may contain undetected software or hardware errors that could lead to an increase in our costs, reduce our net revenues or damage our reputation.
Our products are complex and may contain undetected errors when first introduced or as new versions are released. The occurrence of hardware or software errors could adversely affect sales of our products, cause us to incur significant repair costs, divert the attention of our engineering personnel from product development efforts and cause us to lose credibility with current or prospective customers.
29
Changes in laws, regulations, and financial accounting standards may affect our reported results of operations.
The recently enacted Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related regulations may result in changes in accounting standards or accepted practices within our industry. New pronouncements and varying interpretations of pronouncements have occurred in the past and are likely to occur in the future as a result of recent Congressional and regulatory actions. New laws, regulations, and accounting standards, as well as the questioning of, or changes to, currently accepted accounting practices in the technology industry may adversely affect our reported financial results, which could have an adverse effect on our stock price. Proposals have been made concerning the expensing of stock options which could result in rules or laws that may adversely affect our reported financial results, which could have an adverse effect on our stock price.
Item 3. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Interest Rate Sensitivity
At September 29, 2002, the Companys investment portfolio consisted of fixed income securities, excluding those classified as cash equivalents, of $416.8 million. The Company has the positive intent and ability to hold these securities to maturity. Currently, the carrying amount of these securities approximates fair market value. However, the fair market value of these securities is subject to interest rate risk and would decline in value if market interest rates increased. If market interest rates were to increase immediately and uniformly by 10 percent from the levels at September 29, 2002, the decline in the fair value of the portfolio would not be material to the Companys financial position, results of operations and cash flows. However, if interest rates decreased and securities within the Companys portfolio matured and were re-invested in securities with lower interest rates, interest income would decrease in the future.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that it is able to collect the information it is required to disclose in the reports it files with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to process, summarize and disclose this information within the time periods specified in the rules of the SEC. Based on their evaluation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures which took place as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers believe that these controls and procedures are effective to ensure that the Company is able to collect, process and disclose the information it is required to disclose in the reports it files with the SEC within the required time periods.
Since the date of the most recent evaluation of the Companys internal controls by the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers, there have been no significant changes in such controls or in other factors that could have significantly affected those controls, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Beginning on or about February 20, 2001, the Company and certain of its officers and directors were named as defendants in a number of securities class action lawsuits filed in the United States District Court, Central District of California. The plaintiffs in the actions purport to represent purchasers of the Companys common stock during various periods ranging from January 18, 2001, through February 9, 2001. The complaints allege that the Company and certain of its officers and directors made misrepresentations and omissions in violation of sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The complaints generally seek compensatory damages, costs and attorneys fees in an unspecified amount. Pursuant to a Stipulation and Court Order, the actions have been consolidated. On August 24, 2001, an Amended and Consolidated Complaint was filed. Defendants motion to dismiss was denied by way of an order dated March 7, 2002. Defendants motion for reconsideration of that order was denied by an order dated May 3, 2002. Plaintiffs have commenced discovery. The court certified the class action by an order dated September 30, 2002. The court has scheduled a trial setting conference on June 6, 2003, with an expectation that the case will be set for trial in July, 2003. As a result of these class action lawsuits, a number of derivative cases were filed in state courts in California and Delaware, and in federal court in California, alleging that certain officers and directors breached their fiduciary duties to the Company in connection with the
30
events alleged in the class action lawsuits. The derivative cases filed in California state courts have been consolidated in Orange County Superior Court and plaintiffs filed a consolidated and amended complaint on January 31, 2002. On May 10, 2002, the Orange County Superior Court ordered that the consolidated actions be stayed pending resolution of the federal class action described above. The derivative suit in Delaware was dismissed on August 28, 2001. On March 15, 2002, the United States District Court for the Central District of California ordered that the federal derivative action be stayed pending resolution of the class action lawsuit described above. The plaintiffs in that action filed a motion for reconsideration of that order, which was denied by an order dated June 3, 2002. The above-described litigation could result in substantial costs to the Company and a diversion of managements attention and resources. While the Company believes that the lawsuits are without legal merit and intends to defend them vigorously, because the lawsuits are at an early stage, it is not possible to predict whether the Company will incur any material liability in connection with such lawsuits. The Company received inquiries about events giving rise to the lawsuits from the Securities and Exchange Commission and Nasdaq Stock Market.
The Company is undergoing examination by the Internal Revenue Service of Emulex Corporations 1998 U.S. tax return. It is managements belief that the outcome of this examination will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Additionally, the Company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.
31
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) | Exhibits |
Exhibit 3.1 | Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1997) | |||
Exhibit 3.2 | Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2000) | |||
Exhibit 3.3 | Bylaws of the Company, as amended. | |||
Exhibit 3.4 | Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 2, 1989) | |||
Exhibit 4.1 | Rights Agreement, dated January 19, 1989, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 2, 1989) | |||
Exhibit 4.2 | Certificate regarding extension of Final Expiration Date of Rights Agreement dated January 18, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed on May 17, 1999) | |||
Exhibit 4.3 | Form of 1.75% Convertible Subordinated Note due February 1, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3, amended on June 28, 2002) | |||
Exhibit 4.4 | Indenture between the Company, as Issuer, and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as Trustee, dated January 29, 2002, related to the Companys 1.75% Convertible Subordinated Notes due February 1, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3, amended on June 28, 2002) | |||
Exhibit 4.5 | Registration Rights Agreement between the Company and Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation dated January 29, 2002, related to the Companys 1.75% Convertible Subordinated Notes due February 1, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3, amended on June 28, 2002) | |||
Exhibit 10.1 | Giganet, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed March 2, 2001) | |||
Exhibit 10.2 | Emulex Corporation Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Companys 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K) | |||
Exhibit 10.3 | Emulex Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Companys 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K) | |||
Exhibit 10.4 | Emulex Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Appendix D to the Companys 2002 proxy statement filed on October 21, 2002) | |||
99.1 | Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
32
(b) | Reports on Form 8-K | |
The Registrant filed Form 8-K on September 3, 2002, with respect to expansion of the Registrants repurchase program to include the Registrants convertible subordinated notes and the subsequent repurchase of $136.5 million of convertible subordinated notes. |
33
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: November 12, 2002
EMULEX CORPORATION | ||
By: /s/ Paul F. Folino | ||
|
||
Paul F. Folino Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
||
By: /s/ Michael J. Rockenbach | ||
|
||
Michael J. Rockenbach Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial & Chief Accounting Officer) |
34
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Paul F. Folino, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Emulex Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.
4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report in being prepared; | ||
b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and | ||
c) | presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date. |
5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) | all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and | ||
b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant roles in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: November 12, 2002
/s/ Paul F. Folino
Paul F. Folino
Chief Executive Officer
35
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Michael J. Rockenbach, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Emulex Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.
4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report in being prepared; | ||
b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and | ||
c) | presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date. |
5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) | all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and | ||
b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant roles in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: November 12, 2002
/s/ Michael J. Rockenbach
Michael J. Rockenbach
Chief Financial Officer
36
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. |
Description | |||
Exhibit 3.1 | Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1997) | |||
Exhibit 3.2 | Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2000) | |||
Exhibit 3.3 | Bylaws of the Company, as amended | |||
Exhibit 3.4 | Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 2, 1989) | |||
Exhibit 4.1 | Rights Agreement, dated January 19, 1989, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 2, 1989) | |||
Exhibit 4.2 | Certificate regarding extension of Final Expiration Date of Rights Agreement dated January 18, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed on May 17, 1999) | |||
Exhibit 4.3 | Form of 1.75% Convertible Subordinated Note due February 1, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3, amended on June 28, 2002) | |||
Exhibit 4.4 | Indenture between the Company, as Issuer, and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as Trustee, dated January 29, 2002, related to the Companys 1.75% Convertible Subordinated Notes due February 1, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3, amended on June 28, 2002) | |||
Exhibit 4.5 | Registration Rights Agreement between the Company and Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation dated January 29, 2002, related to the Companys 1.75% Convertible Subordinated Notes due February 1, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3, amended on June 28, 2002) | |||
Exhibit 10.1 | Giganet, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed March 2, 2001) | |||
Exhibit 10.2 | Emulex Corporation Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Companys 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K) | |||
Exhibit 10.3 | Emulex Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Companys 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K) | |||
Exhibit 10.4 | Emulex Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Appendix D to the Companys 2002 proxy statement filed on October 21, 2002) | |||
99.1 | Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
37