Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One) |
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 |
or |
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 000-23354
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Singapore
|
|
Not Applicable |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
One Marina Boulevard, #28-00
Singapore
(Address of registrants principal executive
offices) |
|
018989
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code
(65) 6890 7188
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
Title of Class:
Ordinary Shares, S$0.01 Par Value
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the
Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated
filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes þ No o
As of September 30, 2004, the last business day of the
Registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter,
there were 559,407,967 shares of the Registrants
ordinary shares outstanding, and the aggregate market value of
such shares held by non-affiliates of the registrant (based upon
the closing sale price of such shares on the NASDAQ National
Market on September 30, 2004) was approximately
$7.4 billion.
As of May 31, 2005, there were 569,337,884 shares of
the Registrants ordinary shares outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrants definitive proxy statement, to
be delivered to shareholders in connection with the
Registrants 2005 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders,
are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report
on Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Unless otherwise specifically stated, references in this report
to Flextronics, the Company,
we, us, our and similar
terms mean Flextronics International Ltd. and its subsidiaries.
Except for historical information contained herein, certain
matters discussed in this annual report on Form 10-K are,
or may be deemed as, forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933. The
words will, may, designed
to, believe, should,
anticipate, plan, expect,
intend, estimate and similar expressions
identify forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the
date of this annual report. These forward-looking statements are
contained principally under Item 1, Business,
and under Item 7, Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Because these forward-looking statements are subject to risks
and uncertainties, actual results could differ materially from
the expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements.
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from the expectations reflected in the
forward-looking statements include those described in
Item 1, Business Risk Factors and
Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Given these
risks and uncertainties, the reader should not place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements. We undertake no
obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements
to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
OVERVIEW
We are a leading provider of advanced electronics manufacturing
services (EMS) to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs)
in the following industries:
|
|
|
|
|
handheld devices, with products such as cellular phones and
personal digital assistants; |
|
|
|
computer and office automation, with products such as copiers,
scanners, graphics cards, desktop and notebook computers, and
peripheral devices such as printers and projectors; |
|
|
|
communications infrastructure, with products such as equipment
for optical networks, wireless base stations, access/edge
routers and switches, and broadband access equipment; |
|
|
|
consumer devices, with products such as set-top boxes, home
entertainment equipment, cameras and home appliances; |
|
|
|
information technology infrastructure, with products such as
servers, workstations, storage systems, mainframes, hubs and
routers; and |
|
|
|
a variety of other industries, including the industrial,
automotive and medical industries. |
We are one of the worlds largest EMS providers, with
revenues of $15.9 billion in fiscal year 2005. As of
March 31, 2005, our total manufacturing capacity was
approximately 12.8 million square feet in over
30 countries across five continents. We have established an
extensive network of manufacturing facilities in the
worlds major electronics markets (Asia, Europe and the
Americas) in order to serve the growing outsourcing needs of
both multinational and regional OEMs. In fiscal year 2005, our
net sales in the Americas, Europe, and Asia represented 17%, 35%
and 48% of our total net sales, respectively.
We provide a full range of vertically-integrated global supply
chain services through which we design, build, and ship a
complete packaged product for our OEM customers. Our OEM
customers leverage our services to meet their product
requirements throughout their products entire product life
cycle. The following
1
is a summary list of our vertically-integrated service
offerings, which are described in greater detail in the
Service Offerings section below:
|
|
|
|
|
Design Services; |
|
|
|
Printed Circuit Board and Flexible Circuit Fabrication; |
|
|
|
Systems Assembly and Manufacturing; |
|
|
|
Logistics; and |
|
|
|
After-Market Services. |
We believe that the combination of our extensive design and
engineering services, global presence, vertically integrated
end-to-end services, advanced supply chain management and
operational track record provide us with a competitive advantage
in the market for designing and manufacturing electronic
products for leading multinational OEMs. Through these services
and facilities, we simplify the global product development
process and provide meaningful time and cost savings for our OEM
customers.
Our customers include industry leaders such as: Alcatel SA;
Casio Computer Co., Ltd.; Dell Computer Corporation; Ericsson
Telecom AB; Hewlett-Packard Company; Microsoft Corporation;
Motorola, Inc.; Nortel Networks Limited; Siemens AG;
Sony-Ericsson; Telia Companies; and Xerox Corporation.
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
Due to the intensely competitive nature of the electronics
industry, ever increasing complexity and sophistication of
electronics products, pressure on OEMs to reduce product costs,
and shorter product lifecycles, the demand for advanced
manufacturing capabilities and related services has grown
rapidly. The result has been an increase in the number of OEMs
that utilize EMS providers as part of their business and
manufacturing strategies. This allows OEMs to take advantage of
the global design, manufacturing and supply chain management
expertise of EMS providers, enabling OEMs to concentrate on
product research and development, marketing and sales. We
believe that OEMs realize the following benefits through their
strategic relationships with EMS providers:
|
|
|
|
|
Reducing production costs; |
|
|
|
Accelerating time-to-market and time-to-volume production; |
|
|
|
Reducing capital investment requirements and fixed costs; |
|
|
|
Improving inventory management and purchasing power; |
|
|
|
Accessing worldwide design, engineering, manufacturing, and
logistics capabilities; and |
|
|
|
Focusing on core branding and R&D initiatives. |
We believe that the EMS industry will continue to grow, driven
largely by the need of OEMs to respond to rapidly changing
markets and technologies and to reduce product costs.
Additionally, we believe that there are significant growth
opportunities for EMS providers to win additional business from
OEMs in certain markets or industry segments that have yet to
substantially utilize EMS providers, such as the Japanese market
and the industrial, medical and automotive industry segments.
SERVICE OFFERINGS
We offer a broad range of vertically integrated services to
provide our customers with a total design, manufacturing and
logistics solution that takes a product from its initial design
through volume production, test, distribution and into
post-sales service and support. Our integrated services allow us
to design, build and ship a complete packaged product for our
OEM customers. These services include:
Design Services. We offer a comprehensive range of
value-added design services for our customers that range from
contract design services (CDS), where the customer purchases
services on a time and materials
2
basis, to original product design and manufacturing services,
where the customer purchases a product that we design, develop
and manufacture and that we customize to provide our OEM
customer with a unique look and feel (commonly
referred to as original design manufacturing, or
ODM). ODM products are then sold by our OEM
customers under the OEMs brand name.
Our design services are provided by our global team of over
6,000 design engineers and include:
|
|
|
|
|
User Interface and Industrial Design: We design and
develop innovative, stylish and cost-effective products that
address the needs of the user and the market. Our front-end
creative capabilities offer our OEM customers assistance with
the product creation process. These services include preliminary
product exploration, market research, 2-D sketch level drawings,
3-D mock-ups and proofs of concept, interaction and interface
models, detailed hard models and product packaging. |
|
|
|
Mechanical Engineering and Tooling Design: We offer
detailed product and enclosure design for static and dynamic
solutions in both plastic and metal for low- to high-volume
applications. Additionally, we provide design and development
services for prototype and production tooling equipment used in
manufacturing. |
|
|
|
Electronic System Design: We provide complete electrical
design for products ranging in size from small handheld consumer
devices to large high-speed, carrier-grade, telecommunications
equipment, which includes embedded system and DSP design, high
speed digital interfaces, analog circuit design, power
management solutions, wired and wireless communication
protocols, display and storage solutions, imaging and
audio/video applications, and RF system and antenna design. |
|
|
|
PCB Design: We provide complete PCB design services,
incorporating high layer counts, advanced materials, component
miniaturization technologies, and signal integrity. |
|
|
|
Software Development: We design and develop software and
applications for product and systems design, test, maintenance
and end-user interface, as well as product applications such as
device drivers, embedded applications, communications protocols,
DSP algorithms and web applications. Our Flextronics Software
Systems business provides software outsourcing services,
software products, and system-level software solutions to OEMs,
telephone service providers, and system integrators. |
|
|
|
Components Solutions: We drive manufacturing efficiencies
and cost reductions in the design process by leveraging our
proprietary components solutions for our OEM customers in the
mobile communications industry. These vertically integrated
resources enable us to cost-effectively design and manufacture
critical system components. Our components product offerings
include camera module and antenna solutions. |
|
|
|
Semiconductor Design: We design and deliver digital,
analog and mixed-signal integrated circuits with resources that
include high complexity application specific integrated circuit
(ASIC), design capabilities, gate arrays, imaging devices,
standard cell and custom architectures, field programmable gate
array design services and advanced packaging technologies. |
Printed Circuit Board and Flexible Circuit Fabrication.
Printed circuit boards are platforms composed of laminated
materials that provide the interconnection for integrated
circuits and other electronic components. Semiconductor designs
are currently so complex that they often require printed circuit
boards with multiple layers of narrow, densely spaced wiring or
flexible circuits. The manufacture of these complex multilayer
interconnect and flexible circuit products often requires the
use of sophisticated circuit interconnections between layers,
referred to as vias, and adherence to strict electrical
characteristics to maintain consistent circuit transmission
speeds. We are an industry leader in high-density, multilayer
and flexible printed circuit board manufacturing. We manufacture
printed circuit boards on a low-volume, quick-turn basis, as
well as on a high-volume, production basis. Our quick-turn
prototype service allows us to provide small test quantities to
customers product development groups in as little as
24 hours. Our range of services enables us to respond to
our customers demands for an accelerated transition from
prototype to volume production. We have printed circuit board
and flexible circuit fabrication service capabilities on four
continents, including North America, South America, Europe and
Asia.
3
Systems Assembly and Manufacturing. Our assembly and
manufacturing operations, which generate the majority of our
revenues, include printed circuit board assembly and assembly of
systems and subsystems that incorporate printed circuit boards
and complex electromechanical components. We often assemble
electronics products with our proprietary printed circuit boards
and custom electronic enclosures. In these operations, we employ
just-in-time, ship-to-stock and ship-to-line programs,
continuous flow manufacturing, demand flow processes, and
statistical process controls. As OEMs seek to provide greater
functionality in smaller products, they increasingly require
more sophisticated manufacturing technologies and processes. Our
investment in advanced manufacturing equipment and our
experience and expertise in innovative miniaturization,
packaging and interconnect technologies, enables us to offer a
variety of advanced manufacturing solutions. By way of example,
we have extensive experience in the manufacture of
highly-complex, wireless communications products employing radio
frequency technology.
We offer a comprehensive set of custom electronic enclosures and
related products and services worldwide. Our services include
designing, manufacturing and integrating electronics packaging
systems, including custom enclosure systems, power and thermal
subsystems, interconnect subsystems, cabling and cases. In
addition to standard sheet metal and plastic fabrication
services, we assist in the design of electronic packaging
systems that protect sensitive electronics and enhance
functionality. Our enclosure design services focus on
functionality, manufacturability and testing. These services are
integrated with our other assembly and manufacturing services to
provide our customers with overall improved supply chain
management.
We also offer computer-aided testing services for assembled
printed circuit boards, systems and subsystems. These services
significantly improve our ability to deliver high-quality
products on a consistent basis. Our test services include
management defect analysis, in-circuit testing and functional
testing. In addition, we also provide environmental stress tests
of board and system assemblies.
Our manufacturing and assembly operations capitalize on our
materials inventory management expertise and volume procurement
capabilities. As a result, we believe that we are able to
achieve highly competitive cost reductions and reduce total
manufacturing cycle time for our OEM customers. Materials
procurement and management consist of the planning, purchasing,
expediting and warehousing of components and materials used in
the manufacturing process. In addition, our strategy includes
having third-party suppliers of custom components located in our
industrial parks to reduce material and transportation costs,
simplify logistics and facilitate inventory management. We also
use a sophisticated automated manufacturing resources planning
system and enhanced electronic data interchange capabilities to
ensure inventory control and optimization. Through our
manufacturing resources planning system, we have real-time
visibility of material availability and tracking of work in
process. We utilize electronic data interchange with our
customers and suppliers to implement a variety of supply chain
management programs. Electronic data interchange allows
customers to share demand and product forecasts and deliver
purchase orders and assists suppliers with satisfying
just-in-time delivery and supplier-managed inventory
requirements.
We offer customers flexible, just-in-time delivery programs
allowing product shipments to be closely coordinated with our
customers inventory requirements. Increasingly, we ship
products directly into customers distribution channels or
directly to the end-user. We believe that this service provides
our customers with a comprehensive solution that allows them to
be more responsive to market demands.
Logistics. We provide global logistics services and
turnkey supply chain solutions to our customers. Our worldwide
logistics services include freight forwarding,
warehousing/inventory management and outbound/e-commerce
solutions through our global supply chain network. We leverage
new technologies such as XML links to factories, extranet-based
management, vendor managed inventory and build-to-order
programs, to simultaneously connect suppliers, manufacturing
operations and OEM customers. In addition, our SimFlex
simulation software tool allows our customers to simulate,
analyze and evaluate complex supply chain scenarios, critical
operating characteristics and performance metrics, and supply
chain trade-offs to ensure supply chain excellence. By joining
these logistics solutions with worldwide manufacturing
operations and total supply chain management capabilities in a
tightly integrated process, we believe we enable our OEM
customers to significantly reduce their product costs and react
quickly to constantly changing market demand on a worldwide
basis.
4
After-Market Services. We provide a range of after-market
services, including product repair, re-manufacturing and
maintenance at repair depots, logistics and parts management,
returns processing, warehousing, and engineering change
management. These services are provided through a global network
of operations, hubs and centers. We support our customers by
providing software updates and design modifications that may be
necessary to reduce costs or design-in alternative components
due to component obsolescence or unavailability. Manufacturing
support involves test engineering support and manufacturability
enhancements. We also assist with failure product analysis,
warranty and repair, and field service engineering activities.
Additionally, through Flextronics Network Services, we offer
network and communications installation and maintenance services
to OEMs in the data and telecommunications industries. Our
services include project planning, documentation, engineering,
production, installation and commissioning of equipment. We have
expertise in the installation of fixed and mobile
telecommunications systems, exchanges, corporate networks and
peripheral equipment.
COMPETITIVE STRENGTHS
Over the past several years, we have enhanced our business
through the development and broadening of our various product
and service offerings. We believe that the following
capabilities differentiate us from our competitors and enable us
to better serve our customers:
Extensive Design and Engineering Capabilities. We have an
industry leading global design service offering with more than
6,000 product design engineers providing global design services,
products and solutions to satisfy a wide array of customer
requirements. Our capabilities enable us to provide complete
design solutions to our customers, including components and
software development, and test and engineering services. We
combine our design and manufacturing services to design, develop
and manufacture components (such as camera modules) and complete
products (such as cellular phones), which are then sold by our
OEM customers under the OEMs brand names. This full
product design service offering is referred to as original
design manufacturing (ODM).
Global Presence. We have established an extensive network
of design, manufacturing and logistics facilities in the
worlds major electronics markets (Asia, Europe and the
Americas) to serve the growing outsourcing needs of both
multinational and regional OEMs. Our extensive global network of
manufacturing facilities in over 30 countries gives us the
flexibility to transition customer projects to any of our
locations based on customer requirements.
Vertically Integrated End-to-End Solutions. We offer a
comprehensive range of worldwide supply chain services that
simplify the global product development process and provide
meaningful time and cost savings to our OEM customers. Our
vertically integrated end-to-end services enable us to design,
build and ship a complete packaged product. We also provide
after-market services such as repair and warranty services. We
believe that our capabilities also help our customers improve
product quality, manufacturability, performance, and reduce
costs. As part of our service offerings, we provide complete
supply chain analyses on existing manufacturing strategies and
recommend an optimal supply chain solution to our customers
utilizing our global service footprint.
Low-Cost Manufacturing Services. In order to provide
customers with the lowest manufacturing costs, we have invested
in manufacturing facilities in low-cost regions of the world. As
of March 31, 2005, more than 70% of our manufacturing
capacity was located in low-cost locations, such as Mexico,
Brazil, Poland, Hungary, China, Malaysia and other parts of
Asia. We believe we are the global industry leader in low-cost
production capabilities. A number of our OEM customers have
relocated their production to these locations, where our role in
the local supply chain helps to reduce their total product costs.
As part of our low-cost manufacturing strategy, we have also
established fully integrated, high-volume industrial parks in
Brazil, China, Hungary, Mexico and Poland. These campuses
provide total supply chain management by co-locating our
manufacturing and logistics operations with our suppliers at a
single low-cost
5
location. We believe that this strategy increases our
customers flexibility and reduces distribution barriers,
turnaround times, and overall transportation and product costs.
Advanced Supply Chain Management. We believe that we are
a leader in global procurement, purchasing more than
$14.0 billion of components in our fiscal year ended
March 31, 2005. As a result, we are able to leverage our
worldwide supplier relationships to achieve advantageous pricing
and supply chain flexibility for our OEM customers.
Long-Standing Customer Relationships. We believe that a
cornerstone to our success, and a fundamental requirement for
our sustained growth and profitability, is our long-standing
customer relationships. We believe that our ability to maintain
and grow long-standing customer relationships is due to our
development of a broad range of vertically-integrated service
offerings, and our commitment to delivering consistent
high-quality services. To achieve our quality goals, we monitor
our performance using a number of quality improvement and
measurement techniques.
STRATEGY
Our strategy is to further enhance our vertically-integrated
end-to-end services through the following:
Expand Our Design and Engineering Capabilities. We have
expanded our design and engineering resources as part of our
strategy to offer services that help our OEM customers achieve
time and cost savings for their products. We intend to continue
to expand our design and engineering capabilities by increasing
our research and development capabilities, expanding our
established internal design and engineering resources, and by
developing, licensing and acquiring technologies.
Capitalize on Our Industrial Park Concept. Our industrial
parks are self-contained campuses where we co-locate our
manufacturing and logistics operations with certain of our
strategic suppliers in low-cost regions around the world. These
industrial parks allow us to minimize logistics costs throughout
the supply chain and reduce manufacturing cycle time by reducing
distribution barriers and costs, improving communications,
increasing flexibility, lowering transportation costs and
reducing turnaround times. Each park incorporates the
manufacture of printed circuit boards, components, cables,
plastics and metal parts needed for product assembly. We have
strategically established large industrial parks in Brazil,
China, Hungary, Mexico and Poland. We intend to continue to
capitalize on these industrial parks as part of our strategy to
offer our customers highly-competitive cost reductions and
flexible, just-in-time delivery programs.
Streamline Business Processes Through Information
Technologies. We use a sophisticated automated manufacturing
resources planning system and enhanced electronic data
interchange capabilities to ensure inventory control and
optimization. We streamline business processes by using these
information technology tools to improve order placement,
tracking and fulfillment. We are also able to provide our
customers with online access to product design and manufacturing
process information. We intend to continue to drive our strategy
of streamlining business processes through the use of
information technologies so that we can continue to offer our
customers a comprehensive solution to improve their
communications and relationships across their supply chain and
be more responsive to market demands.
Pursue Strategic Opportunities. We have actively pursued
acquisitions of manufacturing facilities, design and engineering
resources and technologies in order to expand our worldwide
operations, broaden our service offerings, diversify and
strengthen our customer relationships, and enhance our
competitive position as a leading provider of comprehensive
outsourcing solutions. We will continue to selectively pursue
strategic opportunities that we believe will further our
business objectives and enhance shareholder value.
Focus on Core Activities. As part of our strategy, we
continuously evaluate the strategic and financial contributions
of each of our operations and focus our primary growth
objectives on our core EMS vertically-integrated business
activities. We also assess opportunities to maximize shareholder
value with respect to our non-core activities through
divestitures, initial public offerings, spin-offs and other
strategic transactions. Consistent with this strategy, we
entered into an agreement in principle to merge our Flextronics
Network Services business with Telavie AS, a company
wholly-owned by Altor, a private equity firm focusing on
investments in the Nordic region. Under the terms of the
proposed merger, we would receive an
6
undisclosed cash payment plus additional contingent payments
along with ownership of 30% of the merged company.
CUSTOMERS
Our customers include many of the worlds leading
technology companies. We have focused on establishing long-term
relationships with our customers and have been successful in
expanding our relationships to incorporate additional product
lines and services. In fiscal year 2005, our ten largest
customers accounted for approximately 62% of net sales. Our
largest customers during fiscal year 2005 were Sony-Ericsson and
Hewlett-Packard, accounting for approximately 14% and 10% of net
sales, respectively. No other customer accounted for more than
10% of net sales in fiscal year 2005.
The following table lists in alphabetical order a representative
sample of our largest customers in fiscal year 2005 and the
products of those customers for which we provide EMS services:
|
|
|
Customer |
|
End Products |
|
|
|
Alcatel SA
|
|
Cellular phones, accessories and telecommunications
infrastructure |
Casio Computer Co., Ltd.
|
|
Consumer electronics products |
Dell Computer Corporation
|
|
Desktop personal computers and servers |
Ericsson Telecom AB
|
|
Business telecommunications systems and GSM infrastructure |
Hewlett-Packard Company
|
|
Inkjet printers and storage devices |
Microsoft Corporation
|
|
Computer peripherals and consumer electronics gaming products |
Motorola, Inc.
|
|
Cellular phones and telecommunications infrastructure |
Nortel Networks Limited
|
|
Optical, wireless and enterprise telecommunications
infrastructure |
Siemens AG
|
|
Cellular phones and telecommunications infrastructure |
Sony-Ericsson
|
|
Cellular phones |
Telia Companies
|
|
Network and communications design, installation and maintenance |
Xerox Corporation
|
|
Office equipment and components |
SALES AND MARKETING
We achieve worldwide sales coverage through a direct sales
force, which focuses on generating new accounts, and through
program managers, who are responsible for managing relationships
with existing customers and making follow-on sales.
BACKLOG
Although we obtain firm purchase orders from our customers, OEM
customers typically do not make firm orders for delivery of
products more than 30 to 90 days in advance. In addition,
OEM customers may reschedule or cancel firm orders. Therefore,
we do not believe that the backlog of expected product sales
covered by firm purchase orders is a meaningful measure of
future sales.
COMPETITION
The EMS industry is extremely competitive and includes many
companies, several of which have achieved substantial market
share. We compete against numerous domestic and foreign EMS
providers, as well as our current and prospective customers, who
evaluate our capabilities in light of their own. We also face
competition from Taiwanese ODM suppliers, which have a
substantial share of the global market for information
technology hardware production, primarily related to notebook
and desktop computers and
7
personal computer motherboards, and which manufacture consumer
products and provide other technology manufacturing services.
We compete with different companies depending on the type of
service we are providing or the geographic area in which an
activity is taking place. We believe that the principal
competitive factors in the segments of the EMS industry in which
we operate are: quality and range of services; design and
technological capabilities; cost; location of facilities; and
responsiveness and flexibility.
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Our corporate social responsibility practices are broad in
scope, and include a focus on disaster relief, medical aid,
education, environmental protection, health and safety and the
support of communities around the world. We intend to continue
to invest in global communities through grant-making, financial
contributions, volunteer work, support programs and donating
resources.
Our commitment to social responsibility also includes our
mission to positively contribute to global communities and the
environment by adhering to the highest ethical standards of
practice with our customers, suppliers, partners, employees,
communities and investors as well as with respect to our
corporate governance policies and procedures, and by providing a
safe and quality work environment for our employees.
EMPLOYEES
As of March 31, 2005, our global workforce totaled
approximately 92,000 employees. We have never experienced a
significant work stoppage or strike, and we believe that our
employee relations are good.
Our success depends to a large extent upon the continued
services of key managerial and technical employees. The loss of
such personnel could seriously harm our business, results of
operations and business prospects. To date, we have not
experienced significant difficulties in attracting or retaining
such personnel. Although we are not aware that any of our key
personnel currently intend to terminate their employment, we
cannot guarantee their future services.
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
Our operations are subject to a number of regulatory
requirements relating to the use, storage, discharge, and
disposal of hazardous chemicals used during the manufacturing
processes. We believe that our operations are currently in
compliance in all material respects with applicable regulations
and we do not believe that costs of compliance with these laws
and regulations will have a material adverse effect on our
capital expenditures, operating results, or competitive
position. In addition, we are responsible for cleanup of
contamination at some of our current and former manufacturing
facilities and at some third party sites. In the past, we have
engaged an environmental consulting firm to assist us in the
evaluation of environmental liabilities of our ongoing
operations, historical disposal activities and closed sites in
order to establish appropriate accruals in our financial
statements. We determined the amount of our accruals for
environmental matters by analyzing and estimating the range of
possible costs in light of information currently available. The
imposition of more stringent standards or requirements under
environmental laws or regulations, the results of future testing
and analysis undertaken by us at our operating facilities, or a
determination that we are potentially responsible for the
release of hazardous substances at other sites could result in
expenditures in excess of amounts currently estimated to be
required for such matters. While no material exposures have been
identified to date that we are aware of, there can be no
assurance that additional environmental matters will not arise
in the future or that costs will not be incurred with respect to
sites as to which no problem is currently known.
We are also required to comply with certain hazardous substance
content regulations (such as the European Unions Directive
2002/95/ EC about RoHS). Some of our customers require that we
take responsibility for the risk of non-compliance for both the
components that we procure and our own products that we supply
for those customers products. To address this risk, we
require that component suppliers comply with relevant hazardous
substance product content regulations and we engage in other
standard mitigating
8
activities. If we or our suppliers do not comply with these
regulations, we could incur significant costs and/or penalties
relating to noncompliance.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
We own or have licensed various United States and foreign
patents related to a variety of technologies. For certain of our
proprietary processes, we rely on trade secret protection. We
also have registered our corporate name and several other
trademarks and service marks that we use in our business in the
United States and other countries throughout the world.
Although we believe that our intellectual property assets and
licenses are sufficient for the operation of our business as we
currently conduct it, we cannot assure you that third parties
will not make infringement claims against us in the future. In
addition, we are increasingly providing design and engineering
to our customers and designing and making our own products. As a
consequence of these activities, we are required to address and
allocate the ownership and responsibility for intellectual
property in our customer relationships to a greater extent than
in our manufacturing and assembly businesses. If a third party
were to make an assertion regarding the ownership or right to
use intellectual property, we could be required to either enter
into licensing arrangements or to resolve the issue through
litigation. Such license rights may not be available to us on
commercially acceptable terms, if at all, or any such litigation
may not be resolved in our favor. Additionally, litigation could
be lengthy and costly and could materially harm our financial
condition regardless of the outcome. We may also be required to
incur substantial costs to redesign a product or re-perform
design services.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Our Internet address is http://www.flextronics.com. We make
available through our Internet website the Companys annual
reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q,
current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports
filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably
practicable after we electronically file such material with, or
furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.
We were incorporated in the Republic of Singapore in May 1990.
Our principal corporate office is located at One Marina
Boulevard, #28-00, Singapore 018989. Our
U.S. corporate headquarters is located at 2090 Fortune
Drive, San Jose, California, 95131.
RISK FACTORS
|
|
|
We depend on industries that continually produce
technologically advanced products with short life cycles; our
inability to continually manufacture such products on a
cost-effective basis could harm our business. |
We derive our revenues from the following industries:
|
|
|
|
|
handheld devices, with products such as cellular phones and
personal digital assistants; |
|
|
|
computer and office automation, with products such as copiers,
scanners, graphics cards, desktop and notebook computers, and
peripheral devices such as printers and projectors; |
|
|
|
communications infrastructure, with products such as equipment
for optical networks, wireless base stations, access/edge
routers and switches, and broadband access equipment; |
|
|
|
consumer devices, with products such as set-top boxes, home
entertainment equipment, cameras and home appliances; |
|
|
|
information technology infrastructure, with products such as
servers, workstations, storage systems, mainframes, hubs and
routers; and |
|
|
|
a variety of other industries, including the industrial,
automotive and medical industries. |
9
Factors affecting any of these industries in general, or our
customers in particular, could seriously harm us. These factors
include:
|
|
|
|
|
rapid changes in technology, evolving industry standards and
requirements for continuous improvement in products and
services, result in short product life cycles; |
|
|
|
demand for our customers products may be seasonal; |
|
|
|
our customers may fail to successfully market their products,
and our customers products may fail to gain widespread
commercial acceptance; and |
|
|
|
there may be recessionary periods in our customers markets. |
|
|
|
Our customers may cancel their orders, change production
quantities or locations, or delay production. |
As a provider of electronics manufacturing services, we must
provide increasingly rapid product turnaround time for our
customers. We generally do not obtain firm, long-term purchase
commitments from our customers, and we often experience reduced
lead-times in customer orders. Customers cancel their orders,
change production quantities and delay production for a number
of reasons. Uncertain economic and geopolitical conditions have
resulted, and may continue to result, in some of our customers
delaying the delivery of some of the products we manufacture for
them, and placing purchase orders for lower volumes of products
than previously anticipated. Cancellations, reductions or delays
by a significant customer or by a group of customers have
harmed, and may continue to harm, our results of operations by
reducing the volumes of products we manufacture and deliver for
these customers, by causing a delay in the repayment of our
expenditures for inventory in preparation for customer orders
and by lowering our asset utilization resulting in lower gross
margins. In addition, customers often require that manufacturing
of their products be transitioned from one facility to another
to achieve cost and other objectives. Such transfers result in
inefficiencies and costs due to resulting excess capacity and
overhead at one facility and capacity constraints and related
stresses at the other.
In addition, we make significant decisions, including
determining the levels of business that we will seek and accept,
production schedules, component procurement commitments,
personnel and other resource requirements, based on our
estimates of customer requirements. The short-term nature of our
customers commitments and the rapid changes in demand for
their products reduces our ability to accurately estimate the
future requirements of those customers. This makes it difficult
to schedule production and maximize utilization of our
manufacturing capacity.
On occasion, customers require rapid increases in production,
which stress our resources and reduce our margins. Although we
have increased our manufacturing capacity, and plan further
increases, we may not have sufficient capacity at any given time
to meet our customers demands. In addition, because many
of our costs and operating expenses are relatively fixed, a
reduction in customer demand harms our gross profit and
operating income.
|
|
|
Our operating results vary significantly from period to
period. |
We experience significant fluctuations in our results of
operations. Some of the principal factors that contribute to the
fluctuations in our annual and quarterly operating results are:
|
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in general economic conditions; |
|
|
|
changes in demand for our services; |
|
|
|
our effectiveness in managing manufacturing processes and costs
in order to decrease manufacturing expenses; |
|
|
|
the mix of the types of manufacturing services we provide, as
high-volume and low-complexity manufacturing services typically
have lower gross margins than lower volume and more complex
services; |
10
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the cost and availability of labor and components,
which often occur in the electronics manufacturing industry and
which affect our margins and our ability to meet delivery
schedules; |
|
|
|
the degree to which we are able to utilize our available
manufacturing capacity; |
|
|
|
our ability to manage the timing of our component purchases so
that components are available when needed for production, while
avoiding the risks of purchasing inventory in excess of
immediate production needs; |
|
|
|
local conditions and events that may affect our production
volumes, such as labor conditions, political instability and
local holidays; and |
|
|
|
changes in demand in our customers end markets. |
Two of our significant end-markets are the handheld electronics
devices market and the consumer devices market. These markets
exhibit particular strength toward the end of the calendar year
in connection with the holiday season. As a result, we have
historically experienced stronger revenues in our third fiscal
quarter as compared to our other fiscal quarters.
|
|
|
We may encounter difficulties with acquisitions, which
could harm our business. |
We have completed numerous acquisitions of businesses and we
expect to continue to acquire additional businesses in the
future. We are currently in preliminary discussions with respect
to potential acquisitions and strategic customer transactions,
and we are in the process of completing the acquisition of
Nortels optical, and wireless and enterprise manufacturing
operations and related supply chain activities, as described in
Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview. We do not have any other definitive agreements
to make any material acquisitions or strategic customer
transactions. Any future acquisitions may require additional
debt or equity financing. This could increase our leverage or be
dilutive to our existing shareholders. We may not be able to
complete acquisitions or strategic customer transactions in the
future to the same extent as in the past, or at all.
To integrate acquired businesses, we must implement our
management information systems and operating systems and
assimilate and manage the personnel of the acquired operations.
The difficulties of this integration may be further complicated
by geographic distances. The integration of acquired businesses
may not be successful and could result in disruption to other
parts of our business.
In addition, acquisitions involve numerous risks and challenges,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulties in integrating acquired businesses and operations; |
|
|
|
diversion of managements attention from the normal
operation of our business; |
|
|
|
potential loss of key employees and customers of the acquired
companies, which is a particular concern in the acquisition of
companies engaged in product and software design; |
|
|
|
difficulties managing and integrating operations in
geographically dispersed locations; |
|
|
|
lack of experience operating in the geographic market or
industry sector of the acquired business; |
|
|
|
the risk of deficiencies in internal controls at acquired
companies; |
|
|
|
increases in our expenses and working capital requirements,
which reduce our return on invested capital; and |
|
|
|
exposure to unanticipated liabilities of acquired companies. |
These and other factors have harmed, and in the future could
harm, our ability to achieve anticipated levels of profitability
at acquired operations or realize other anticipated benefits of
an acquisition, and could adversely affect our business and
operating results.
11
|
|
|
Our new strategic relationship with Nortel involves a
number of risks, and we may not succeed in realizing the
anticipated benefits of this relationship. |
The transaction with Nortel described in Item 7,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Overview
is subject to a number of closing conditions, including
regulatory approvals, conversion of information technology
systems, and the completion of the required information and
consultation process with employee representatives in Europe.
Some of the processes involved in converting information
technology systems (including the integration of related systems
and internal controls) are complex and time consuming, and may
present unanticipated difficulties. As a result, we currently
expect that this transaction will not be completed before the
March 2006 quarter. Further delays may arise if the conversion
of information technology systems requires more time than
presently anticipated. In addition, completion of the required
information and consultation process with employee
representatives in Europe may result in additional delays and in
difficulties in retaining employees.
After closing, the success of this transaction will depend on
our ability to successfully integrate the acquired operations
with our existing operations. This will involve integrating
Nortels operations into our existing procurement
activities, and assimilating and managing existing personnel. In
addition, this transaction will increase our expenses and
working capital requirements, and place burdens on our
management resources. In the event we are unsuccessful in
integrating the acquired operations, we would not achieve the
anticipated benefits of this transaction, and our results of
operations would be adversely affected.
As a result of the new strategic relationship, we expect that
Nortel will become our largest single customer, and will
represent over 10% of our net sales. The manufacturing
relationship with Nortel is not exclusive, and they are entitled
to use other suppliers for a portion of their requirements of
these products. Although Nortel has agreed to use us to
manufacture a majority of its requirements for these existing
products, for so long as our services are competitive, our
services may not remain competitive, and there can be no
assurance that we will continue to manufacture a majority of
Nortels requirements for these products. In addition,
sales of these products depend on a number of factors, including
global economic conditions, competition, new technologies that
could render these products obsolete, the level of sales and
marketing resources devoted by Nortel with respect to these
products, and the success of these sales and marketing
activities. If demand for these products should decline, we
would experience reduced sales and gross margins from these
products.
We have agreed to cost reduction targets and price limitations
and to certain manufacturing quality requirements. We may not be
able to reduce costs over time as required, and Nortel would be
entitled to certain reductions in their product prices, which
would adversely affect our margins from this program. In
addition, we may encounter difficulties in meeting Nortels
expectations as to product quality and timeliness. If
Nortels requirements exceed the volume we anticipate, we
may be unable to meet these requirements on a timely basis. Our
inability to meet Nortels volume, quality, timeliness and
cost requirements could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations. Additionally, Nortel may not purchase a
sufficient quantity of products from us to meet our expectations
and we may not utilize a sufficient portion of the acquired
capacity to achieve profitable operations, which could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations.
We completed the closing of the acquisition of Nortels
optical design operations in November 2004, and as a result we
employ approximately 150 of Nortels former optical design
employees. In addition, in February 2005, we also completed the
closing of the manufacturing operations and related assets
(including product integration, testing, repair and logistics
operations) in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. We may fail to retain
and motivate these employees or to successfully integrate them
into our operations.
Although we expect that our gross margin and operating margin on
sales to Nortel will initially be less than that generally
realized by the Company in fiscal 2005, we also expect that we
will be able to increase these gross margins over time through
cost reductions and by internally sourcing our vertically
integrated supply chain solutions, which include the fabrication
and assembly of printed circuit boards and enclosures, as well
as logistics and repair services. Additionally, the impact of
lower gross margins may be partially offset by
12
the effect of anticipated lower selling, general and
administrative expenses, as a percentage of net sales. There can
be no assurance that we will realize lower expenses or increased
operating efficiencies as anticipated.
|
|
|
Our strategic relationships with major customers create
risks. |
Over the past several years, we have completed numerous
strategic transactions with OEM customers, including, among
others, Alcatel, Casio, Ericsson and Xerox, and we are currently
in the process of completing a strategic transaction with
Nortel. Under these arrangements, we generally acquire
inventory, equipment and other assets from the OEM, and lease or
acquire their manufacturing facilities, while simultaneously
entering into multi-year supply agreements for the production of
their products. We intend to continue to pursue these OEM
divestiture transactions in the future. There is strong
competition among EMS companies for these transactions, and this
competition may increase. These transactions have contributed to
a significant portion of our revenue growth, and if we fail to
complete similar transactions in the future, our revenue growth
could be harmed. The arrangements entered into with divesting
OEMs typically involve many risks, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
we may need to pay a purchase price to the divesting OEMs that
exceeds the value we may realize from the future business of the
OEM; |
|
|
|
the integration of the acquired assets and facilities into our
business may be time-consuming and costly; |
|
|
|
we, rather than the divesting OEM, bear the risk of excess
capacity at the facility; |
|
|
|
we may not achieve anticipated cost reductions and efficiencies
at the facility; |
|
|
|
we may be unable to meet the expectations of the OEM as to
volume, product quality, timeliness and cost reductions; |
|
|
|
our supply agreements with the OEMs generally do not require any
minimum volumes of purchase by the OEMs, and the actual volume
of purchases may be less than anticipated; and |
|
|
|
if demand for the OEMs products declines, the OEM may
reduce its volume of purchases, and we may not be able to
sufficiently reduce the expenses of operating the facility or
use the facility to provide services to other OEMs. |
As a result of these and other risks, we have been, and in the
future may be, unable to achieve anticipated levels of
profitability under these arrangements. In addition, these
strategic arrangements have not, and in the future may not,
result in any material revenues or contribute positively to our
earnings per share.
|
|
|
If we do not effectively manage changes in our operations,
our business may be harmed. |
We have experienced growth in our business through a combination
of internal growth and acquisitions, and we expect to make
additional acquisitions in the future, including our pending
completion of the acquisition of assets from Nortel described in
Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview. Our global workforce has more than doubled in
size since the beginning of fiscal year 2001. During that time,
we have also reduced our workforce at some locations and closed
certain facilities in connection with our restructuring
activities. These changes have placed considerable strain on our
management control systems and resources, including decision
support, accounting management, information systems and
facilities. If we do not continue to improve our financial and
management controls, reporting systems and procedures to manage
our employees effectively and to expand our facilities, our
business could be harmed.
We plan to continue to transition manufacturing to lower cost
locations and we may be required to take additional
restructuring charges in the future as a result of these
activities. We also intend to increase our
13
manufacturing capacity in our low-cost regions by expanding our
facilities and adding new equipment. Acquisitions and expansions
involve significant risks, including, but not limited to, the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
we may not be able to attract and retain the management
personnel and skilled employees necessary to support
newly-acquired or expanded operations; |
|
|
|
we may not efficiently and effectively integrate new operations
and information systems, expand our existing operations and
manage geographically dispersed operations; |
|
|
|
we may incur cost overruns; |
|
|
|
we may incur charges related to our expansion activities; |
|
|
|
we may encounter construction delays, equipment delays or
shortages, labor shortages and disputes and production start-up
problems that could harm our growth and our ability to meet
customers delivery schedules; and |
|
|
|
we may not be able to obtain funds for acquisitions and
expansions on attractive terms, and we may not be able to obtain
loans or operating leases with attractive terms. |
In addition, we expect to incur new fixed operating expenses
associated with our expansion efforts that will increase our
cost of sales, including increases in depreciation expense and
rental expense. If our revenues do not increase sufficiently to
offset these expenses, our operating results could be seriously
harmed. Our transition to low-cost manufacturing regions has
contributed to significant restructuring and other charges that
have resulted from reducing our workforce and capacity at
higher-cost locations. We recognized restructuring charges of
approximately $95.4 million, $540.3 million and
$297.0 million in fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, associated with the consolidation and closure of
several manufacturing facilities, and related impairment of
certain long-lived assets. We expect to recognize approximately
$100 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2006 and we
may be required to take additional charges in the future as a
result of these activities. We cannot assure you as to the
timing or amount of any future restructuring charges. If we are
required to take additional restructuring charges in the future,
it could have a material adverse impact on operating results,
financial position and cash flows.
|
|
|
Our increased design services offering may reduce our
profitability. |
As part of our strategy to enhance our vertically-integrated
end-to-end service offerings, we are actively pursuing the
expansion of our design and engineering capabilities, which
requires that we make investments in research and development,
technology licensing, test and tooling equipment, patent
applications, facility expansion, and recruitment.
Although we enter into contracts with our design services
customers, we may design and develop products for these
customers prior to receiving a purchase order or other firm
commitment from them. We are required to make substantial
investments in the resources necessary to design and develop
these products, and no revenue may be generated from these
efforts if our customers do not approve the designs in a timely
manner or at all, or if they do not then purchase anticipated
levels of products. Certain of the products we design and
develop must satisfy safety and regulatory standards and some
must receive government certifications. If we fail to obtain
these approvals or certifications on a timely basis, we would be
unable to sell these products, which would harm our sales,
profitability and reputation. In addition, design activities
often require that we purchase inventory for initial production
runs before we have a purchase commitment from a customer. Even
after we have a contract with a customer with respect to a
product, these contracts may allow the customer to delay or
cancel deliveries and may not obligate the customer to any
volume of purchases. These contracts can generally be terminated
by either party on short notice. Due to the increased risks
associated with our design services offerings, we may not be
able to achieve a high enough level of sales for this business
to be profitable. Due to the initial costs of investing in the
resources necessary to expand our design and engineering
capabilities, and in particular to support our ODM services
offerings, our profitability during fiscal years 2005 and 2004
was adversely affected. We continue to make investments in these
capabilities, which could adversely affect our profitability
during fiscal year 2006 and beyond.
14
|
|
|
Intellectual property infringement claims against our
customers or us could harm our business. |
Our design services involve the creation and use of intellectual
property rights, which subject us to the risk of claims of
intellectual property infringement from third parties, as well
as claims arising from the allocation of intellectual property
rights among us and our design services customers. In addition,
customers for our ODM and components design services typically
require that we indemnify them against the risk of intellectual
property infringement. If any claims are brought against us or
our customers for such infringement, whether or not these have
merit, we could be required to expend significant resources in
defense of such claims. In the event of such an infringement
claim, we may be required to spend a significant amount of money
to develop non-infringing alternatives or obtain licenses. We
may not be successful in developing such alternatives or
obtaining such a license on reasonable terms or at all.
|
|
|
The success of certain of our design activities depends on
our ability to protect our intellectual property rights. |
We retain certain intellectual property rights to certain
technologies that we develop as part of our engineering and
design activities. As the level of our engineering and design
activities is increasing, the extent to which we rely on rights
to intellectual property incorporated into products is
increasing. Despite our efforts, we cannot be certain that the
measures we have taken to prevent unauthorized use of our
technology will be successful. If we are unable to protect our
intellectual property rights, this could reduce or eliminate the
competitive advantages of our proprietary technology, which
would harm our business.
|
|
|
If our ODM products or components are subject to design
defects, our business may be damaged and we may incur
significant fees and costs. |
A defect in a design could result in product or component
failures or a product liability claim. In our contracts with our
ODM products or components customers we generally provide a
warranty against defects in our designs. Since we provide this
warranty to these customers we are exposed to an increased risk
of warranty claims. If we design a product or component that is
found to have a design defect, we could spend a significant
amount of money to resolve these design warranty claims. We may
also incur considerable costs in connection with product
liability claims that may arise as a result of our design and
engineering activities. We have limited product liability
insurance coverage, however it is expensive and may not be
available with respect to all of our design services offerings
on acceptable terms, in sufficient amounts, or at all. A
successful product liability claim in excess of our insurance
coverage or any material claim for which insurance coverage is
denied or limited or is not available could have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
|
|
|
We are exposed to intangible asset risk. |
We have a substantial amount of intangible assets. These
intangible assets are attributable to acquisitions and represent
the difference between the purchase price paid for the acquired
businesses and the fair value of the net tangible assets of the
acquired businesses. We are required to evaluate goodwill and
other intangibles for impairment on at least an annual basis,
and whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable from estimated future cash flows.
As a result of our annual and other periodic evaluations, we may
determine that the intangible asset values need to be written
down to their fair values, which could result in material
charges that could be adverse to our operating results and
financial position.
|
|
|
We depend on the continuing trend of outsourcing by
OEMs. |
Future growth in our revenues depends on new outsourcing
opportunities in which we assume additional manufacturing and
supply chain management responsibilities from OEMs. To the
extent that these opportunities are not available, either
because OEMs decide to perform these functions internally or
because they use other providers of these services, our future
growth would be limited.
15
|
|
|
The majority of our sales come from a small number of
customers; if we lose any of these customers, our sales could
decline significantly. |
Sales to our ten largest customers represent a significant
percentage of our net sales. Our ten largest customers accounted
for approximately 62% and 64% of net sales in fiscal years 2005
and 2004, respectively. Our largest customers during fiscal year
2005 were Sony-Ericsson and Hewlett-Packard, which accounted for
approximately 14% and 10% of net sales, respectively.
Hewlett-Packard and Sony-Ericsson each accounted for
approximately 12% of net sales in fiscal 2004. No other customer
accounted for more than 10% of net sales in fiscal year 2005 or
fiscal year 2004.
Our principal customers have varied from year to year, and our
principal customers may not continue to purchase services from
us at current levels, if at all. Significant reductions in sales
to any of these customers, or the loss of major customers, would
seriously harm our business. If we are not able to timely
replace expired, canceled or reduced contracts with new
business, our revenues could be harmed.
|
|
|
Our industry is extremely competitive. |
The EMS industry is extremely competitive and includes many
companies, several of which have achieved substantial market
share. Current and prospective customers also evaluate our
capabilities against the merits of manufacturing products
themselves. Some of our competitors may have greater design,
manufacturing, financial or other resources than we do.
Additionally, we face competition from Taiwanese ODM suppliers,
which have a substantial share of the global market for
information technology hardware production, primarily related to
notebook and desktop computers and personal computer
motherboards, and which manufacture consumer products and
provide other technology manufacturing services.
The overall demand for electronics manufacturing services
decreased in recent years, resulting in increased capacity and
substantial pricing pressures, which have harmed our operating
results. Certain sectors of the EMS industry have experienced
increased price competition, and if we experience such increased
level of competition in the future, our revenues and gross
margin may continue to be adversely affected.
|
|
|
We may be adversely affected by shortages of required
electronic components. |
At various times, there have been shortages of some of the
electronic components that we use, as a result of strong demand
for those components or problems experienced by suppliers. These
unanticipated component shortages have resulted in curtailed
production or delays in production, which prevented us from
making scheduled shipments to customers in the past and may do
so in the future. Our inability to make scheduled shipments
could cause the Company to experience a reduction in sales,
increase in inventory levels and costs, and could adversely
affect relationships with existing and prospective customers.
Component shortages may also increase our cost of goods sold
because we may be required to pay higher prices for components
in short supply and redesign or reconfigure products to
accommodate substitute components. As a result, component
shortages could adversely affect our operating results for a
particular period due to the resulting revenue shortfall and
increased manufacturing or component costs.
|
|
|
We are subject to the risk of increased income
taxes. |
We have structured our operations in a manner designed to
maximize income in countries where:
|
|
|
|
|
tax incentives have been extended to encourage foreign
investment; or |
|
|
|
income tax rates are low. |
We base our tax position upon the anticipated nature and conduct
of our business and upon our understanding of the tax laws of
the various countries in which we have assets or conduct
activities. However, our tax position is subject to review and
possible challenge by taxing authorities and to possible changes
in law, which may have retroactive effect. We cannot determine
in advance the extent to which some jurisdictions may require us
to pay taxes or make payments in lieu of taxes.
16
Several countries in which we are located allow for tax holidays
or provide other tax incentives to attract and retain business.
These tax incentives expire over various periods from 2005 to
2010 and are subject to certain conditions with which we expect
to comply. We have obtained tax holidays or other incentives
where available, primarily in China, Malaysia and Hungary. In
these three countries, we generated an aggregate of
approximately $10 billion of our total revenues for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2005. Our taxes could increase
if certain tax holidays or incentives are not renewed upon
expiration, or tax rates applicable to us in such jurisdictions
are otherwise increased. In addition, further acquisitions or
divestitures may cause our effective tax rate to increase.
|
|
|
We conduct operations in a number of countries and are
subject to risks of international operations. |
The geographical distances between the Americas, Asia and Europe
create a number of logistical and communications challenges for
the Company. These challenges include managing operations across
multiple time zones, directing the manufacture and delivery of
products across distances, coordinating procurement of
components and raw materials and their delivery to multiple
locations, and coordinating the activities and decisions of the
core management team, which is based in a number of different
countries. Facilities in several different locations may be
involved at different stages of the production of a single
product, leading to additional logistical difficulties.
Because our manufacturing operations are located in a number of
countries throughout the Americas, Asia and Europe, we are
subject to the risks of changes in economic and political
conditions in those countries, including:
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the value of local currencies; |
|
|
|
labor unrest and difficulties in staffing; |
|
|
|
longer payment cycles; |
|
|
|
cultural differences; |
|
|
|
increases in duties and taxation levied on our products; |
|
|
|
imposition of restrictions on currency conversion or the
transfer of funds; |
|
|
|
limitations on imports or exports of components or assembled
products, or other travel restrictions; |
|
|
|
expropriation of private enterprises; and |
|
|
|
a potential reversal of current favorable policies encouraging
foreign investment or foreign trade by our host countries. |
The attractiveness of our services to U.S. customers can be
affected by changes in U.S. trade policies, such as most
favored nation status and trade preferences for some Asian
countries. In addition, some countries in which we operate, such
as Brazil, Hungary, Mexico, Malaysia and Poland, have
experienced periods of slow or negative growth, high inflation,
significant currency devaluations or limited availability of
foreign exchange. Furthermore, in countries such as China and
Mexico, governmental authorities exercise significant influence
over many aspects of the economy, and their actions could have a
significant effect on us. Finally, we could be seriously harmed
by inadequate infrastructure, including lack of adequate power
and water supplies, transportation, raw materials and parts in
countries in which we operate.
|
|
|
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could
increase our operating costs. |
Our manufacturing operations and industrial parks are located in
lower cost regions of the world, such as Asia, Eastern Europe
and Mexico; however, most of our purchase and sale transactions
are denominated in United States Dollars or Euros. As a result,
we are exposed to fluctuations in the functional currencies of
our fixed cost overhead or our supply base relative to the
currencies in which we conduct transactions.
Currency exchange rates fluctuate on a daily basis as a result
of a number of factors, including changes in a countrys
political and economic policies. Volatility in the functional
currencies of our entities and the Euro
17
or United States Dollar could seriously harm our business,
operating results and financial condition. The primary impact of
currency exchange fluctuations is on our cash, receivables, and
payables of our operating entities. As part of our currency
hedging strategy, we use financial instruments, primarily
forward purchase contracts, to hedge United States Dollar and
other currency commitments in order to reduce the short-term
impact of foreign currency fluctuations on current assets and
liabilities. Additionally, we manage our foreign currency
exposure by borrowing money in various foreign currencies. If
our hedging activities are not successful or if we change or
reduce these hedging activities in the future, we may experience
significant unexpected expenses from fluctuations in exchange
rates.
We are also exposed to the risk that China may revalue its
currency relative to other foreign currencies. The Chinese
currency is the renminbi yuan (RMB). The Chinese government is
under global international pressure to relax its control over
the exchange rate of the RMB relative to the United States
Dollar and instead to let the value of the RMB float
either free or within a band against the United Stated Dollar.
It is generally understood that the effect of the Chinese
governments control of the RMB exchange rate has been to
undervalue the RMB. There is no certainty as to whether the
Chinese government will elect to revalue the RMB in the near
future, or at all. In addition, the Chinese government has not
disclosed the magnitude of any revaluation it may be
considering. A significant increase in the value of the RMB
could adversely affect our financial results and cash flows by
increasing both our manufacturing costs and the costs of our
local supply base.
|
|
|
We depend on our executive officers and skilled management
personnel. |
Our success depends to a large extent upon the continued
services of our executive officers. Generally our employees are
not bound by employment or non-competition agreements, and we
cannot assure you that we will retain our executive officers and
other key employees. We could be seriously harmed by the loss of
any of our executive officers. In order to manage our growth, we
will need to recruit and retain additional skilled management
personnel and if we are not able to do so, our business and our
ability to continue to grow could be harmed. In addition, in
connection with expanding our design services offerings, we must
attract and retain experienced design engineers. Although we and
a number of companies in our industry have implemented workforce
reductions, there remains substantial competition for highly
skilled employees. Our failure to recruit and retain experienced
design engineers could limit the growth of our design services
offerings, which could adversely affect our business.
|
|
|
We are subject to environmental compliance risks. |
We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign
environmental laws and regulations, including hazardous
substance product content regulations, and regulations governing
the use, storage, discharge and disposal of hazardous substances
in the ordinary course of our manufacturing process. We are
exposed to liabilities related to hazardous substance content
regulations as some customers are requiring that we take
responsibility for the risk of non-compliance for the components
that we procure for those customers products. To address
this risk, we require that component suppliers comply with
relevant hazardous substance product content regulations and we
engage in other standard mitigating activities. However, these
efforts may be unsuccessful and we may incur significant
liabilities and be required to expend substantial amounts of
money on behalf of our customers to enforce or otherwise satisfy
the obligations of the component suppliers.
In addition, we are responsible for cleanup of contamination at
some of our current and former manufacturing facilities and at
some third party sites. If more stringent compliance or cleanup
standards under environmental laws or regulations are imposed,
or the results of future testing and analyses at our current or
former operating facilities indicate that we are responsible for
the release of hazardous substances, we may be subject to
additional remediation liability. Further, additional
environmental matters may arise in the future at sites where no
problem is currently known or at sites that we may acquire in
the future. Currently unexpected costs that we may incur with
respect to environmental matters may result in additional loss
contingencies, the quantification of which cannot be determined
at this time.
18
|
|
|
The market price of our ordinary shares is
volatile. |
The stock market in recent years has experienced significant
price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market
prices of technology companies. These fluctuations have often
been unrelated to or disproportionately impacted by the
operating performance of these companies. The market for our
ordinary shares may be subject to similar fluctuations. Factors
such as fluctuations in our operating results, announcements of
technological innovations or events affecting other companies in
the electronics industry, currency fluctuations and general
market conditions may cause the market price of our ordinary
shares to decline.
|
|
|
It may be difficult for investors to effect services of
process within the United States on us or to enforce civil
liabilities under the federal securities laws of the United
States against us. |
We are incorporated in Singapore under the Companies Act,
Chapter 50 of Singapore, or Singapore Companies Act. Some
of our officers reside outside the United States. A substantial
portion of the assets of Flextronics International Ltd. are
located outside the United States. As a result, it may not be
possible for investors to effect service of process within the
United States upon us or to enforce against us in United States
courts, judgments obtained in such courts predicated upon the
civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the
United States. Judgments of United States courts based upon the
civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the
United States are not directly enforceable in Singapore courts
and there can be no assurance as to whether Singapore courts
will enter judgments in original actions brought in Singapore
courts based solely upon the civil liability provisions of the
federal securities laws of the United States.
Our facilities consist of a global network of industrial parks,
regional manufacturing operations, design and engineering and
product introduction centers, providing over 12.8 million
square feet of manufacturing capacity as of March 31, 2005
(excluding facilities we have identified for closure, as
described in Note 10, Restructuring Charges in
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8,
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data). We own
facilities with approximately 1.7 million square feet in
the Americas, 3.7 million square feet in Asia and
2.6 million square feet in Europe. We lease facilities with
approximately 1.2 million square feet in the Americas,
2.5 million square feet in Asia and 1.1 million square
feet in Europe.
Our facilities include large industrial parks, ranging in size
from approximately 300,000 to 2.3 million square feet, in
Brazil, China, Hungary, Mexico and Poland. We also have regional
manufacturing operations, ranging in size from approximately
24,000 to 2.7 million square feet, in Austria, Brazil,
Canada, China, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary,
India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands,
Norway, Singapore, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand and the
United States. We also have smaller design and engineering
centers and product introduction centers at a number of
locations in the worlds major electronics markets.
Our facilities are well maintained and suitable for the
operations conducted. The productive capacity of our plants is
adequate for current needs.
|
|
ITEM 3. |
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
We are subject to legal proceedings, claims, and litigation
arising in the ordinary course of business. We defend ourselves
vigorously against any such claims. Although the outcome of
these matters is currently not determinable, management does not
expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will
have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations, or cash flows.
|
|
ITEM 4. |
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
None.
19
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5. |
MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED
SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES |
PRICE RANGE OF ORDINARY SHARES
Our ordinary shares are quoted on the NASDAQ National Market
under the symbol FLEX. The following table sets
forth the high and low per share sales prices for our ordinary
shares since the beginning of fiscal year 2004 as reported on
the NASDAQ National Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$ |
14.31 |
|
|
$ |
12.04 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
14.85 |
|
|
|
11.67 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
14.69 |
|
|
|
10.08 |
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
18.85 |
|
|
|
14.95 |
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$ |
19.31 |
|
|
$ |
14.80 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
16.00 |
|
|
|
13.87 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
15.82 |
|
|
|
10.34 |
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
11.56 |
|
|
|
8.27 |
|
As of May 31, 2005 there were 3,490 holders of record of
our ordinary shares and the closing sale price of our ordinary
shares as reported on the NASDAQ National Market was
$12.78 per share.
DIVIDENDS
Since inception, we have not declared or paid any cash dividends
on our ordinary shares (exclusive of dividends paid by pooled
entities prior to acquisition). The terms of our outstanding
senior subordinated notes restrict our ability to pay cash
dividends. For more information, please see Item 7,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources.
SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION
PLANS
Equity Compensation Plan Information
As of March 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) | |
|
(B) | |
|
(C) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
Exercise Price of | |
|
Remaining for Future | |
|
|
to be Issued Upon | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Issuance Under Equity | |
|
|
Exercise of | |
|
Options, | |
|
Compensation Plans | |
|
|
Outstanding Options, | |
|
Warrants and | |
|
(Excluding Securities | |
Plan Category |
|
Warrants and Rights | |
|
Rights | |
|
Referred to in Column (a)) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity Compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
29,824,395 |
|
|
$ |
15.06 |
|
|
|
23,071,462 |
(2) |
Equity Compensation plans not approved by security holders(1)(4)
|
|
|
21,713,418 |
|
|
$ |
11.28 |
|
|
|
1,909,746 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
51,537,813 |
|
|
$ |
13.47 |
|
|
|
24,981,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The Companys 2004 Award Plan for New Employees was
established in October 2004. Key features of the Plan include
the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
The purpose of the Plan is to provide incentives to attract,
retain and motivate eligible persons whose potential
contributions are important to the success of the Company by
offering such persons an opportunity to participate in the
Companys future performance through stock awards; |
20
|
|
|
|
|
Grants under the Plan may be granted only to persons who:
(a) were not previously an employee or director of the
Company or any parent or subsidiary of the Company or
(b) have either (i) completed a period of bona fide
non-employment by the Company, and any parent or subsidiary of
the Company, of at least 1 year, or (ii) are returning
to service as an employee of the Company, or any parent or
subsidiary of the Company, after a period of bona fide
non-employment of less than 1 year due to the
Companys acquisition of such persons employer; and
then only as an incentive to such persons entering into
employment with the Company or any parent or subsidiary of the
Company; |
|
|
|
The Company may only grant nonqualified stock options or stock
bonuses under the Plan; and |
|
|
|
The Plan is administered by the Companys Compensation
Committee, which is comprised of two independent directors. |
|
|
(2) |
Of these, 23,071,462 ordinary shares remained available for
grant under the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. There are no
additional ordinary shares available for grant under the 1993
Equity Incentive Plan, the 1999, 1998, and 1997 Interim Option
Plans. |
|
(3) |
Of these, 459,021 ordinary shares remained available for grant
under the 2002 Interim Incentive Plan and 1,450,725 ordinary
shares remained available for grant under the 2004 Award Plan
for New Employees. On May 12, 2005, our Board of Directors
approved an increase of 2.5 million ordinary shares
available for grant under the 2004 Award Plan for New Employees. |
|
(4) |
Companies acquired by us have adopted option plans, which we
refer to as the Assumed Plans. Options to purchase a total of
6,040,588 ordinary shares under the Assumed Plans have been
assumed. These options have a weighted average exercise price of
$5.89 per share. These options have been converted into
options to purchase our ordinary shares on the terms specified
in the applicable acquisition agreement, but are otherwise
administered in accordance with terms of the Assumed Plans.
Options under the Assumed Plans generally vest over four years
and expire 10 years from the date of grant. No further
awards may be made under the Assumed Plans. Options outstanding
under the Assumed Plans are not included in the above table. |
RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
On February 10, 2005, we issued 2,247,915 ordinary shares
in consideration for the acquisition by merger of all of the
outstanding shares of a privately-held company that provides
advanced multimedia software products and services pursuant to
the exemption from registration provided by
Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933. In
connection with the acquisition, we also agreed to issue
ordinary shares (i) having an aggregate value of
approximately $3.3 million (subject to downward adjustment)
on or prior to February 10, 2006, and (ii) having an
aggregate value of approximately $5 million (subject to
downward adjustment) on or prior to March 31, 2006.
INCOME TAXATION UNDER SINGAPORE LAW
Dividends. Singapore does not impose withholding tax on
dividends.
Capital Gains. Under current Singapore tax law there is
no tax on capital gains, and, thus, any profits from the
disposal of shares are not taxable in Singapore unless the
seller of the shares is carrying on a trade in shares in
Singapore (in which case, the profits on the sale would be
taxable as trade profits rather than capital gains).
Stamp Duty. There is no stamp duty payable for holding
shares, and no duty is payable on the acquisition of
newly-issued shares. When existing shares are acquired in
Singapore, stamp duty is payable on the instrument of transfer
of the shares at the rate of S$2 for every S$1,000 of the market
value of the shares. The stamp duty is borne by the purchaser
unless there is an agreement to the contrary. If the instrument
of transfer is executed outside of Singapore, stamp duty must be
paid if the instrument of transfer is received in Singapore.
21
Estate Taxation. If an individual who is not domiciled in
Singapore dies on or after January 1, 2002, no estate tax
is payable in Singapore on any of our shares held by the
individual. An individual shareholder who is a U.S. citizen
or resident (for U.S. estate tax purposes) also will have
the value of the shares included in the individuals gross
estate for U.S. estate tax purposes. An individual
shareholder generally will be entitled to a tax credit against
the shareholders U.S. estate tax to the extent the
individual shareholder actually pays Singapore estate tax on the
value of the shares; however, such tax credit is generally
limited to the percentage of the U.S. estate tax
attributable to the inclusion of the value of the shares
included in the shareholders gross estate for
U.S. estate tax purposes, adjusted further by a pro rata
apportionment of available exemptions. Individuals who are
domiciled in Singapore should consult their own tax advisors
regarding the Singapore estate tax consequences of their
investment.
Tax Treaties Regarding Withholding. Because Flextronics
International Ltd. is a non-resident Singapore company, any
reciprocal tax treaties between the U.S. and Singapore do not
apply to us.
|
|
ITEM 6. |
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
These historical results are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected in the future. The following table is
qualified by reference to and should be read in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statements, related notes thereto and
other financial data included elsewhere herein.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
15,908,223 |
|
|
$ |
14,530,416 |
|
|
$ |
13,378,699 |
|
|
$ |
13,104,847 |
|
|
$ |
12,109,699 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
14,827,860 |
|
|
|
13,704,576 |
|
|
|
12,650,402 |
|
|
|
12,224,969 |
|
|
|
11,127,896 |
|
Restructuring and other charges(1)
|
|
|
78,381 |
|
|
|
477,305 |
|
|
|
266,244 |
|
|
|
464,391 |
|
|
|
510,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,001,982 |
|
|
|
348,535 |
|
|
|
462,053 |
|
|
|
415,487 |
|
|
|
471,308 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
568,533 |
|
|
|
487,287 |
|
|
|
456,199 |
|
|
|
443,586 |
|
|
|
430,109 |
|
Intangibles amortization
|
|
|
42,520 |
|
|
|
36,715 |
|
|
|
22,146 |
|
|
|
12,615 |
|
|
|
63,541 |
|
Restructuring and other charges(1)
|
|
|
3,487 |
|
|
|
63,043 |
|
|
|
38,167 |
|
|
|
110,035 |
|
|
|
462,847 |
|
Interest and other expense, net
|
|
|
94,205 |
|
|
|
77,700 |
|
|
|
92,780 |
|
|
|
91,853 |
|
|
|
67,115 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
16,328 |
|
|
|
103,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
276,909 |
|
|
|
(420,119 |
) |
|
|
(147,239 |
) |
|
|
(242,602 |
) |
|
|
(552,304 |
) |
Benefit from income taxes
|
|
|
(62,962 |
) |
|
|
(67,741 |
) |
|
|
(63,786 |
) |
|
|
(88,854 |
) |
|
|
(106,285 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
339,871 |
|
|
$ |
(352,378 |
) |
|
$ |
(83,453 |
) |
|
$ |
(153,748 |
) |
|
$ |
(446,019 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share(2)
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
(0.67 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.31 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing diluted earnings (loss) per share
amounts
|
|
|
585,499 |
|
|
|
525,318 |
|
|
|
517,198 |
|
|
|
489,553 |
|
|
|
441,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$ |
906,971 |
|
|
$ |
884,816 |
|
|
$ |
897,741 |
|
|
$ |
1,394,883 |
|
|
$ |
1,914,741 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
11,007,572 |
|
|
|
9,583,937 |
|
|
|
8,394,104 |
|
|
|
8,644,699 |
|
|
|
7,571,655 |
|
Total long-term debt and capital lease obligations, excluding
current portion
|
|
|
1,709,570 |
|
|
|
1,624,261 |
|
|
|
1,049,853 |
|
|
|
863,293 |
|
|
|
917,313 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
5,224,048 |
|
|
|
4,367,213 |
|
|
|
4,542,020 |
|
|
|
4,455,496 |
|
|
|
4,030,361 |
|
22
|
|
(1) |
We recognized restructuring charges of $95.4 million,
$540.3 million, $297.0 million, $530.0 million,
and $584.4 million in fiscal years 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002,
and 2001, respectively, associated with the consolidation and
closure of several manufacturing facilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
We recognized a $29.3 million gain from the liquidation of
certain international entities and $7.6 million in
executive separation costs in fiscal year 2005. |
|
|
|
We recognized charges of $8.2 million, $7.4 million
and $44.4 million in fiscal years 2005, 2003 and 2002,
respectively, for the other than temporary impairment of our
investments in certain non-publicly traded companies. |
|
|
|
We recognized charges of $286.5 million in fiscal year 2001
related to the issuance of an equity instrument to Motorola. |
|
|
|
We recognized charges of approximately $102.4 million in
fiscal year 2001 for merger-related expenses. |
|
|
(2) |
We completed a stock split during fiscal year 2001. The stock
split was effected as a bonus issue (the Singapore equivalent of
a stock dividend). The stock dividend has been reflected in our
financial statements for all periods presented unless otherwise
noted. All share and per share amounts have been retroactively
restated to reflect the stock split. |
|
|
ITEM 7. |
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
This report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933. The words expects,
anticipates, believes,
intends, plans and similar expressions
identify forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements
which refer to expectations, projections or other
characterizations of future events or circumstances are
forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to
publicly disclose any revisions to these forward-looking
statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring
subsequent to filing this Form 10-K with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. These forward-looking statements are
subject to risks and uncertainties, including, without
limitation, those discussed in this section and in
Item 1 Business Risk
Factors. Accordingly, our future results could differ
materially from historical results or from those discussed or
implied by these forward-looking statements.
OVERVIEW
We are a leading provider of advanced electronics manufacturing
services (EMS) to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs)
of a broad range of products in the following industries:
handheld devices; computer and office automation; communications
infrastructure; information technology infrastructure; consumer
devices; and a variety of other industries, including the
industrial, automotive and medical industries. We provide a full
range of vertically-integrated global supply chain services
through which we design, build, and ship a complete packaged
product for our OEM customers. Our OEM customers leverage our
services to meet their product requirements throughout their
products entire product life cycle. Our
vertically-integrated service offerings include: design
services; printed circuit board and flexible circuit
fabrication; systems assembly and manufacturing; logistics; and
after-market services.
We are one of the worlds largest EMS providers, with
revenues of $15.9 billion in fiscal year 2005. As of
March 31, 2005, our total manufacturing capacity was
approximately 12.8 million square feet in over 30 countries
across five continents. We have established an extensive network
of manufacturing facilities in the worlds major
electronics markets (the Americas, Europe, and Asia) in order to
serve the growing outsourcing needs of both multinational and
regional OEMs. In fiscal year 2005, our net sales in the
Americas, Europe, and Asia represented 17%, 35% and 48% of our
total net sales, respectively.
We believe that the combination of our extensive design and
engineering services, global presence, vertically-integrated
end-to-end services, advanced supply chain management and
operational track record provide us with a competitive advantage
in the market for designing and manufacturing electronic
products for
23
leading multinational OEMs. Through these services and
facilities, we simplify the global product development process
and provide meaningful time and cost savings for our OEM
customers.
We have actively pursued acquisitions and purchases of
manufacturing facilities, design and engineering resources and
technologies in order to expand our worldwide operations,
broaden our service offerings, diversify and strengthen our
customer relationships, and enhance our competitive position as
a leading provider of comprehensive outsourcing solutions. We
have completed numerous strategic transactions with OEM
customers, including, among others, Nortel, Xerox, Alcatel,
Casio and Ericsson, over the past several years. These strategic
transactions have expanded our customer base, provided
end-market diversification, and contributed to a significant
portion of our revenue growth. Under these arrangements, we
generally acquire inventory, equipment and other assets from the
OEM, and lease or acquire their manufacturing facilities, while
simultaneously entering into multi-year supply agreements for
the production of their products. We will continue to
selectively pursue strategic opportunities that we believe will
further our business objectives and enhance shareholder value.
On June 29, 2004, we entered into an asset purchase
agreement with Nortel providing for our purchase of certain of
Nortels optical, wireless, wireline and enterprise
manufacturing operations and optical design operations. The
assets to be acquired consist primarily of inventory and capital
equipment currently in use. The purchase of these assets will
occur in stages, with the first and second stages completed in
November 2004 and February 2005, and further stages scheduled in
multiple phases during fiscal year 2006. We anticipate that the
aggregate purchase price for the assets acquired from Nortel
will be in the range of approximately $650 million to
$700 million. The purchase price will be allocated to the
fair value of the acquired assets, which management currently
estimates will be approximately $415 million to
$465 million for inventory, approximately $35 million
for fixed assets, and the remaining $200 million for
intangible assets. We completed the closing of the optical
design businesses in Canada and Northern Ireland on
November 1, 2004, which resulted in the payment of
$12.8 million to Nortel. On February 8, 2005 we also
completed the closing of the manufacturing operations and
related assets (including product integration, testing, repair
and logistics operations) in Montreal, Quebec, which resulted in
the payment of $83.7 million to Nortel. In connection with
these closings, we entered into promissory notes amounting to
$185.7 million, which are due in three quarterly payments
in calendar year 2005. The timing of the remaining cash payments
by us to Nortel relating to the remaining factory transfers from
Nortel to us is still being negotiated.
Subject to closing the remaining asset acquisitions, we will
provide the majority of Nortels systems integration
activities, final assembly, testing and repair operations, along
with the management of the related supply chain and suppliers,
under a four-year manufacturing agreement. Additionally, under a
three-year design services agreement, we will provide Nortel
with design services for end-to-end, carrier grade optical
network products.
Although we expect that our gross margin and operating margin on
sales to Nortel will initially be less than that generally
realized by the us in fiscal 2005, we also expect that we will
be able to increase these gross margins over time through cost
reductions and by internally sourcing our vertically integrated
supply chain solutions, which include the fabrication and
assembly of printed circuit boards and enclosures, as well as
logistics and repair services. Additionally, the impact of lower
gross margins may be partially offset by the effect of
anticipated lower selling, general and administrative expenses,
as a percentage of net sales. There can be no assurance that we
will realize lower expenses or increased operating efficiencies
as anticipated.
The completion of the Nortel transaction is subject to a number
of closing conditions, including regulatory approvals,
conversion of information technology systems, and the completion
of the required information and consultation process with
employee representatives in Europe. As with other strategic
transactions, we believe the completion of this transaction may
have significant impacts on our sales, end-market
diversification, margins, results from operations, financial
position and working capital.
The EMS industry has experienced rapid change and growth over
the past decade. The demand for advanced manufacturing
capabilities and related supply chain management services has
escalated, as an increasing number of OEMs outsourced some or
all of their design and manufacturing requirements. Price
pressure on our customers products in their end markets
has led to increased demand for EMS production
24
capacity in the lower cost regions of the world, such as China,
Mexico, and Eastern Europe, where we have a significant
presence. We have responded by making strategic decisions to
realign our global capacity and infrastructure with the demand
of our OEM customers so as to optimize the operating
efficiencies that can be provided by our global presence. The
overall impact of these activities is that we have shifted our
manufacturing capacity to locations with higher efficiencies and
in some instances, lower costs, thereby enhancing our ability to
provide cost-effective manufacturing service in order for us to
retain and expand our existing relationships with customers and
attract new business. As a result, we have recognized
$95.4 million, $540.3 million and $297.0 million
of restructuring charges in fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, in connection with the realignment of our global
capacity and infrastructure. Additionally, we expect to
recognize approximately $100 million of restructuring
charges in fiscal year 2006 and we may be required to take
additional charges in the future as a result of these activities.
Our revenue is generated from sales of our services to our
customers, which include industry leaders such as Alcatel SA,
Casio Computer Co., Ltd., Dell Computer Corporation, Ericsson
Telecom AB, Hewlett-Packard Company, Microsoft Corporation,
Motorola, Inc., Nortel Networks Limited, Siemens AG,
Sony-Ericsson, Telia Companies, and Xerox Corporation. We
currently depend, and expect to continue to depend, upon a small
number of customers for a significant portion of our revenues.
In fiscal 2005, our ten largest customers accounted for
approximately 62% of net sales and our largest customers were
Sony-Ericsson and Hewlett-Packard Company, which accounted for
approximately 14% and 10% of our net sales, respectively. No
other customer accounted for more than 10% of net sales in
fiscal year 2005. For any particular customer, we may be engaged
in programs to design or manufacture a number of products, or
may be designing or manufacturing a single product or product
line.
Our operating results are affected by a number of factors,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
our customers may not be successful in marketing their products,
their products may not gain widespread commercial acceptance,
and our customers products have short product life cycles; |
|
|
|
our customers may cancel or delay orders or change production
quantities; |
|
|
|
our operating results vary significantly from period to period
due to the mix of the manufacturing services we are providing,
the number and size of new manufacturing programs, the degree to
which we utilize our manufacturing capacity, seasonal demand,
shortages of components and other factors; |
|
|
|
integration of acquired businesses and facilities; and |
|
|
|
managing growth and changes in our operations. |
We also are subject to other risks, including risks associated
with operating in foreign countries, changes in our tax rates,
and fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Please see
Item 1, Business Risk Factors.
We continuously evaluate the strategic and financial
contributions of each of our operations and focus our primary
growth objectives on our core EMS vertically-integrated business
activities. We also assess opportunities to maximize shareholder
value with respect to our non-core activities through
divestitures, initial public offerings, spin-offs and other
strategic transactions. Consistent with this strategy, we
entered into an agreement in principle to merge our Flextronics
Network Services business with Telavie AS, a company
wholly-owned by Altor, a private equity firm focusing on
investments in the Nordic region. Under the terms of the
proposed merger, we would receive an undisclosed cash payment
plus additional contingent payments along with ownership of 30%
of the merged company.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates and assumptions.
25
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our
more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation
of our consolidated financial statements. For further discussion
of our significant accounting policies, refer to Note 2,
Summary of Accounting Policies, of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8,
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
We review property and equipment for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is
recognized when the carrying amount of a long-lived asset
exceeds its fair value. Recoverability of property and equipment
is measured by comparing its carrying amount to the projected
discounted cash flows the property and equipment are expected to
generate. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the
impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which
the carrying amount of the property and equipment exceeds its
fair value.
We evaluate goodwill and other intangibles for impairment on an
annual basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable from
its estimated future cash flows. Recoverability of goodwill is
measured at the reporting unit level by comparing the reporting
units carrying amount, including goodwill, to the fair
value of the reporting unit. If the carrying amount of the
reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill is considered
impaired and a second test is performed to measure the amount of
impairment loss. If, at the time of our annual evaluation, the
net asset value (or book value) of any reporting
unit is greater than its fair value, some or all of the related
goodwill would likely be considered to be impaired. To date, we
have not recognized any impairment of our goodwill and other
intangible assets in connection with our impairment evaluations.
However, we have recorded impairment charges in connection with
our restructuring activities.
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers
financial condition and make provisions for doubtful accounts
based on the outcome of our credit evaluations. We evaluate the
collectability of our accounts receivable based on specific
customer circumstances, current economic trends, historical
experience with collections and the age of past due receivables.
Unanticipated changes in the liquidity or financial position of
our customers may require additional provisions for doubtful
accounts.
Our inventories are stated at the lower of cost (on a first-in,
first-out basis) or market value. Our industry is characterized
by rapid technological change, short-term customer commitments
and rapid changes in demand. We make provisions for estimated
excess and obsolete inventory based on our regular reviews of
inventory quantities on hand and the latest forecasts of product
demand and production requirements from our customers. If actual
market conditions or our customers product demands are
less favorable than those projected, additional provisions may
be required. In addition, unanticipated changes in liquidity or
financial position of our customers and/or changes in economic
conditions may require additional provisions for inventories due
to our customers inability to fulfill their contractual
obligations with regard to inventory being held on their behalf.
We recognized restructuring charges in each of the last three
fiscal years, related to our plans to close or consolidate
duplicate manufacturing and administrative facilities. In
connection with these activities, we recorded restructuring
charges for employee termination costs, long-lived asset
impairment and other exit-related costs.
The recognition of the restructuring charges required that we
make certain judgments and estimates regarding the nature,
timing and amount of costs associated with the planned exit
activity. If our actual results in exiting these facilities
differ from our estimates and assumptions, we may be required to
revise the estimates
26
of future liabilities, requiring the recording of additional
restructuring charges or the reduction of liabilities already
recorded. At the end of each reporting period, we evaluate the
remaining accrued balances to ensure that no excess accruals are
retained and the utilization of the provisions are for their
intended purpose in accordance with developed exit plans.
Refer to Note 10, Restructuring Charges, of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8,
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for
further discussion of our restructuring activities.
Our deferred income tax assets represent temporary differences
between the financial statement carrying amount and the tax
basis of existing assets and liabilities that will result in
deductible amounts in future years, including net operating loss
carryforwards. Based on estimates, the carrying value of our net
deferred tax assets assumes that it is more likely than not that
we will be able to generate sufficient future taxable income in
certain tax jurisdictions to realize these deferred income tax
assets. Our judgments regarding future profitability may change
due to future market conditions, changes in U.S. or
international tax laws and other factors. If these estimates and
related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to
increase or decrease our valuation allowance against the
deferred tax assets resulting in additional or lesser income tax
expense.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated,
certain statements of operations data expressed as a percentage
of net sales. The financial information and the discussion below
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included in this document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net sales
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales
|
|
|
93.2 |
|
|
|
94.3 |
|
|
|
94.5 |
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Intangibles amortization
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Other charges (income), net
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Interest and other expense, net
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Benefit from income taxes
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
(2.4 |
)% |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales in fiscal year 2005 totaled $15.9 billion,
representing an increase of $1.4 billion, or 9.5%, from
$14.5 billion in fiscal year 2004. Net sales for fiscal
year 2005 increased by $1.1 billion and $672.8 million
in Asia and the Americas, respectively, and decreased by
$428.1 million in Europe. The Company experienced increases
in net sales across each of the industries it serves; however,
the increase in net sales was primarily attributable to
(i) an increase of $559.4 million in net sales to
providers of communication infrastructure products,
(ii) our continued expansion of business with new and
existing customers in the industrial, medical and automotive
industries, which resulted in an increase of $538.6 million
in net sales, (iii) an increase of $170.1 million in
net sales to customers in the handheld devices industry, which
was primarily driven by the
27
increase in net sales of $605.2 million with Sony-Ericsson,
our largest customer, offset by declines with certain other
handheld customers and (iv) an increase of
$78.1 million in net sales to customers in the computer and
office automation industries.
Net sales in fiscal year 2004 totaled $14.5 billion,
representing an increase of $1.2 billion, or 9%, from
$13.4 billion in fiscal year 2003. The increase in net
sales was primarily attributed to the addition of new customer
programs and increased customer demand on existing programs, as
a consequence of a recovery in worldwide economic conditions in
many markets during fiscal year 2004.
Our gross profit is affected by a number of factors, including
the number and size of new manufacturing programs, product mix,
component costs and availability, product life cycles, unit
volumes, pricing, competition, new product introductions,
capacity utilization and the expansion and consolidation of
manufacturing facilities. Typically, a new program will
contribute relatively less to our gross margin in its early
stages, as manufacturing volumes are low and result in
inefficiencies and unabsorbed manufacturing overhead costs. As
volumes increase, the contribution to gross margin often
increases due to the ability to leverage improved utilization
rates and overhead absorption. In addition, different programs
can contribute different gross margins depending on factors such
as the types of services involved, location of production, size
of the program, complexity of the product, and level of material
costs associated with the associated products. As a result, our
gross margin varies from period to period.
Gross profit in fiscal year 2005 increased $653.4 million
to $1.0 billion, or 6.3% of net sales, from
$348.5 million, or 2.4% of net sales, in fiscal year 2004.
The 390 basis point increase in gross margin was mainly
attributed to a 280 basis-point decrease in restructuring
charges, combined with a 110 basis-point decrease in cost of
sales resulting primarily from the increased level of business
associated with our higher margin areas of our business, such as
design and engineering, network services, software services and
printed circuit board fabrication, along with better absorption
of fixed costs driven by our restructuring efforts and the
significant increase in net sales. The restructuring charges
related to the consolidation and closure of various facilities
is described in more detail below in the section entitled,
Restructuring Charges.
Gross profit in fiscal year 2004 decreased $113.5 million,
or 2.4% of net sales, from $462.1 million, or 3.5% of net
sales, in fiscal year 2003. The 110 basis point decrease in
gross margin was primarily attributed to a130 basis point
increase in restructuring charges, offset by a 20 basis
point decrease in other cost of sales. The restructuring charges
were related to the consolidation and closure of various
facilities, which is described in more detail below in the
section entitled, Restructuring Charges. The
20 basis point reduction in other cost of sales resulted
primarily from better absorption of fixed costs that resulted
from the restructuring activities and increased net sales.
In recent years, we have initiated a series of restructuring
activities in light of the global economic downturn. These
activities, which are intended to realign our global capacity
and infrastructure with demand by our OEM customers and thereby
improve our operational efficiency, include:
|
|
|
|
|
reducing excess workforce and capacity; |
|
|
|
consolidating and relocating certain manufacturing facilities to
lower-cost regions; and |
|
|
|
consolidating and relocating certain administrative facilities. |
The restructuring costs include employee severance, costs
related to leased facilities, owned facilities that are no
longer in use and are to be disposed of, leased equipment that
is no longer in use and will be disposed of, and other costs
associated with the exit of certain contractual agreements due
to facility closures. The overall impact of these activities is
that we have shifted our manufacturing capacity to locations
with higher efficiencies and, in some instances, lower costs,
and are better utilizing our overall existing manufacturing
capacity. This has enhanced our ability to provide
cost-effective manufacturing service offerings, which
28
enables us to retain and expand our existing relationships with
customers and attract new business. Although we believe we are
realizing our anticipated benefits from these efforts, we
continue to monitor our operational efficiency and capacity
requirements and will utilize similar measures in the future to
realign our operations relative to future customer demand. We
expect to recognize approximately $100 million of
restructuring charges in fiscal year 2006 and we may be required
to take additional charges in the future as a result of these
activities, which could have a material adverse impact on our
operating results, financial position and cash flows. We cannot
predict the timing or amount of any future restructuring charges.
During fiscal year 2005, we recognized restructuring charges of
approximately $95.4 million. Restructuring charges recorded
by reportable geographic region amounted to $9.7 million,
$2.4 million and $83.3 million, for the Americas, Asia
and Europe, respectively. The involuntary employee terminations
identified by reportable geographic region amounted to 270, 241,
and 2,506 for the Americas, Asia and Europe, respectively.
Approximately $78.4 million of the restructuring charges
was classified as a component of cost of sales.
During fiscal year 2004, we recognized restructuring charges of
approximately $540.3 million. Restructuring charges
recorded by reportable geographic region amounted to
$200.8 million, $111.3 million and
$228.2 million, for the Americas, Asia and Europe,
respectively. The involuntary employee terminations identified
by reportable geographic region amounted to 2,083 and 3,093 for
the Americas and Europe, respectively. Approximately
$477.3 million of the restructuring charges was classified
as a component of cost of sales.
During fiscal year 2003, we recognized restructuring charges of
approximately $297.0 million and other charges of
$7.4 million related to the impairment of investments in
certain technology companies. Restructuring and other charges
recorded by reportable geographic region amounted to
$167.2 million, $1.8 million and $128.0 million,
for the Americas, Asia and Europe, respectively. The involuntary
employee terminations identified by reportable geographic region
amounted to 2,922, 4,896 and 290 for the Americas, Europe and
Asia, respectively. Approximately $266.2 million of the
restructuring charges was classified as a component of cost of
sales.
We believe that the potential savings in cost of goods sold
achieved through lower depreciation and reduced employee
expenses will be offset in part by reduced revenues at the
affected facilities. In addition, we may incur further
restructuring charges in the future as we continue to
reconfigure our operations in order to address excess capacity
concerns, which may materially affect our results of operations
in future periods.
Refer to Note 10, Restructuring Charges, of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8,
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for
further discussion of our restructuring activities.
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
Selling, general and administrative expenses, or SG&A, in
fiscal year 2005 amounted to $568.5 million, or 3.6% of net
sales, compared to $487.3 million, or 3.4% of net sales, in
fiscal year 2004. The increase in SG&A was primarily
attributable to the continuing expansion of our higher margin
businesses such as design and engineering services, network
services, software services and printed circuit board
fabrication, which have higher SG&A expenses than our
systems assembly and manufacturing operations, which account for
the majority of our net sales, combined with increases in
corporate and administrative expenses, primarily sales and
supply-chain management, necessary to support the continued
growth of our business.
SG&A in fiscal year 2004 increased to $487.3 million
from $456.2 million in fiscal year 2003. SG&A as a
percentage of net sales in fiscal years 2004 and 2003 was 3.4%.
The absolute dollar increase was primarily attributed to the
continuing expansion of our ODM service offering, offset by
savings generated by our control over discretionary spending
combined with efficiencies generated from our restructuring
activities.
29
Amortization of intangible assets in fiscal year 2005 increased
to $42.5 million from $36.7 million in fiscal year
2004. The increase is due to the amortization expense associated
with intangible assets acquired through various business
acquisitions during fiscal year 2004 and 2005.
Amortization of intangible assets in fiscal year 2004 was
$36.7 million, which represents an increase of
$14.6 million from $22.1 million in fiscal year 2003.
The increase is primarily attributed to the amortization expense
related to intangible assets acquired through various business
acquisitions during fiscal year 2004 and in the second half of
fiscal year 2003, in particular due to the completion of our
assessment of the value of intangible assets acquired from Telia
Companies and Xerox Corporation.
|
|
|
Other charges (income), net |
During fiscal year 2005, we realized a foreign exchange gain of
$29.3 million from the liquidation of certain international
entities, offset by a loss of $8.2 million for other than
temporary impairment of our investments in certain non-publicly
traded technology companies and $7.6 million of charges
related to the resignation of Robert R.B. Dykes from his
position as Chief Financial Officer. We amended certain of
Mr. Dykes stock option agreements to provide for full
acceleration of vesting of approximately 1.2 million of
Mr. Dykes outstanding but unvested stock options and
extension of the expiration date of approximately
1.5 million of stock options to five years after his
employment termination date. Such options would otherwise have
expired ninety days after the termination of employment. These
amendments resulted in a charge of approximately
$5.6 million. In addition, we made a lump-sum cash payment
of approximately $2.0 million to Mr. Dykes.
During fiscal year 2003, we recorded $7.4 million for the
other than temporary impairment of investments in certain
non-publicly traded technology companies.
|
|
|
Interest and other expense, net |
Interest and other expense, net was $94.2 million in fiscal
year 2005 compared to $77.7 million in fiscal year 2004, an
increase of $16.5 million. The increase is driven by the
issuance of $500.0 million of 6.25% senior
subordinated notes in November 2004 and overall higher debt
balances during fiscal year 2005, higher foreign exchange
losses, and higher minority interest expense resulting primarily
from our Hughes Software Systems Ltd acquisition.
Interest and other expense, net in fiscal year 2004 was
$77.7 million, a decrease of $15.1 million from
$92.8 million in fiscal year 2003. The decrease in net
expense resulted from the redemption of $150 million
aggregate principal amount of our 8.75% senior subordinated
notes due October 2007 in June 2003 and the repurchase of
$492.3 million aggregate principal amount of our
9.875% notes in August 2003. During fiscal year 2004, we
issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of
6.5% senior subordinated notes due May 2013 and
$500.0 million aggregate principal amount of
1% convertible subordinated notes due August 2010.
|
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
During fiscal year 2005, we paid approximately
$190.1 million to redeem
144.2 million
of 9.75% Euro senior subordinated notes due 2010 and recorded a
loss of $16.3 million from the early extinguishment of debt.
We recognized a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of
$103.9 million during fiscal year 2004. During fiscal year
2004, we used a portion of the net proceeds from our issuance of
$400 million of 6.5% senior subordinated notes due May
2013 in May 2003 to redeem $150 million of
8.75% senior subordinated notes due October 2007. During
fiscal year 2004, we used a portion of the net proceeds from our
issuance in August 2003 of the $500 million aggregate
principal amount of the 1% convertible subordinated notes
due May 2013 to repurchase $492.3 million of our
9.875% senior subordinated notes due July 2010.
30
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
Certain of our subsidiaries have, at various times, been granted
tax relief in their respective countries, resulting in lower
income taxes than would otherwise be the case under ordinary tax
rates. See Note 8, Income Taxes, of the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8,
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Our consolidated effective tax rate was a benefit of 23%, 16%
and 43% in fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The
tax benefit for fiscal year 2005 is primarily due to the
establishment of a $25.0 million deferred tax asset
resulting from a tax law change in Hungary that replaced a tax
holiday incentive with a tax credit incentive and
$59.2 million tax benefit resulting from changes in
valuation allowances for deferred tax assets based upon
managements current analysis of the realizability of these
deferred tax assets. The consolidated effective tax rate for a
particular period varies depending on the amount of earnings
from different jurisdictions, operating loss carryforwards,
income tax credits, changes in previously established valuation
allowances for deferred tax assets based upon managements
current analysis of the realizability of these deferred tax
assets, as well as certain tax holidays and incentives granted
to our subsidiaries primarily in China, Hungary, India and
Malaysia.
In evaluating the realizability of the deferred tax assets,
management considers the recent history of operating income and
losses by jurisdiction, exclusive of items that it believes are
non-recurring in nature such as restructuring charges and losses
associated with early extinguishment of debt. Management also
considers the future projected operating income in the relevant
jurisdiction and the effect of any tax planning strategies.
Based on this analysis, management believes that the current
valuation allowance is adequate.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At March 31, 2005 we had cash and cash equivalents balances
totaling $869.3 million and bank and other debts totaling
$1.7 billion. We also had a revolving credit facility of
$1.1 billion under which we had no borrowings outstanding
as of March 31, 2005. On May 27, 2005, we amended our
revolving credit facility to increase the amount of the facility
to $1.35 billion, extend the maturity date from March 2008
to March 2010, reduce the interest rate on borrowings under the
facility, reduce the commitment fee on the unutilized portion of
the credit facility and make certain changes in the restrictive
and financial covenants. See our discussion below under
Contractual Obligations and Commitments.
Cash provided by operating activities was $724.3 million,
$187.7 million and $607.8 million in fiscal years
2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Working capital as of
March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004, was approximately
$907.0 million and $884.8 million, respectively.
During fiscal year 2005, cash provided by operating activities
was primarily generated by net income of $339.9 million, an
increase in accounts payable and other current liabilities of
$560.0 million, offset by an increase in inventories of
$339.4 million. The increase in accounts payable, other
current liabilities and inventories was primarily due to our
continued expansion of our business. During fiscal year 2004,
cash provided by operating activities reflected increases in
trade payables and other current liabilities of approximately
$535.7 million, offset by increases in accounts receivable
and inventory of approximately $380.7 million and
$40.3 million, respectively. During fiscal year 2003, cash
provided by operating activities reflected reductions in
accounts receivable and inventory of approximately
$449.5 million and $150.7 million, respectively,
offset by reductions in trade payables and other current
liabilities of approximately $338.4 million.
Cash used in investing activities was $738.3 million,
$403.8 million, and $813.0 million in fiscal years
2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Cash used in investing
activities in fiscal year 2005 primarily related to the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
net capital expenditures of $289.7 million for the purchase
of equipment and for the continued expansion of various
manufacturing facilities in certain low cost, high volume
centers, primarily in Asia; |
31
|
|
|
|
|
our payments, net of cash acquired, for Hughes Software Systems
(of approximately $250.2 million), certain Nortel
operations (of approximately $96.5 million) and of
$122.3 million for various other acquisitions of
businesses; and |
|
|
|
$14.5 million of investments in certain non-publicly traded
technology companies; |
offset by
|
|
|
|
|
$34.9 million of proceeds from our participation in our
trade receivables securitization program. |
Cash used in investing activities in fiscal year 2004 primarily
related to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
net capital expenditures of $181.5 million to purchase
manufacturing equipment for continued expansion of manufacturing
facilities in certain lower-cost, high-volume centers, primarily
Asia, China and Poland; |
|
|
|
payments of $120.0 million for acquisitions of
businesses; and |
|
|
|
other investments and notes receivable of $102.3 million. |
Cash used in investing activities in fiscal year 2003 primarily
related to:
|
|
|
|
|
net capital expenditures of $208.3 million for the purchase
of equipment and our continued expansion of our high volume
manufacturing facilities in certain lower-cost, high-volume
centers; |
|
|
|
payments of $501.6 million for acquisitions of businesses,
primarily NatSteel Broadway; and |
|
|
|
payments of $95.0 million for investments and notes
receivable primarily related to our participation in our trade
receivables securitization program. |
Financing activities generated $316.3 million and
$394.8 million in fiscal years 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Cash provided by financing activities in fiscal year 2005
primarily related to:
|
|
|
|
|
net proceeds from the public offering of approximately
24.3 million ordinary shares, which generated
$299.5 million; |
|
|
|
net proceeds of $493.0 million from the issuance in
November 2004 of $500.0 million of 6.25% senior
subordinated notes due November 2014; and |
|
|
|
proceeds of $36.6 million from the sale of ordinary shares
under our employee stock plans; |
offset by
|
|
|
|
|
the repurchase of $190.1 million of 9.75% Euro senior
subordinated notes due 2010; and |
|
|
|
net repayments of borrowings under our revolving credit facility
and other bank borrowings of $298.8 million. |
Cash provided by financing activities during fiscal year 2004
primarily related to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
net proceeds of $393.7 million from the issuance in May
2003 of 6.5% senior subordinated notes due May 2013; |
|
|
|
net proceeds of $484.7 million from the issuance in August
2003 of 1% convertible subordinated notes due August 2010; |
|
|
|
proceeds of $220 million from borrowings under our
revolving credit facility; |
|
|
|
proceeds of $61.1 million from the sale of ordinary shares
under our employee stock plans; |
offset by
|
|
|
|
|
the redemption of 8.75% senior subordinated notes due
October 2007, which used $156.6 million; and |
|
|
|
the repurchase of $492.3 million of 9.875% senior
subordinated notes due July 2010. |
32
Net cash used in financing activities was $103.5 million in
fiscal year 2003. Cash used in financing activities during
fiscal year 2003 primarily related to repayments of debt
obligations of approximately $1.0 billion, offset by:
|
|
|
|
|
additional borrowings of $893.0 million, which included the
issuance of $200.0 million zero coupon, zero yield,
convertible junior subordinated notes due 2008; and |
|
|
|
$27.9 million in proceeds from the issuance of our ordinary
shares pursuant to our employee stock plans. |
On June 29, 2004, we entered into an asset purchase
agreement with Nortel providing for our purchase of certain of
Nortels optical, wireless, wireline and enterprise
manufacturing operations and optical design operations. The
purchase of these assets will occur in stages, with the first
and second stage completed in November 2004 and February 2005
and further stages scheduled in multiple phases during fiscal
year 2006. We anticipate that the aggregate cash purchase price
for the assets acquired will be in the range of approximately
$650 million to $700 million. We completed the closing
of the optical design businesses in Canada and Northern Ireland
on November 1, 2004, which resulted in the payment of
$12.8 million to Nortel. On February 8, 2005, we also
completed the closing of the manufacturing operations and
related assets (including product integration, testing, repair
and logistics operations) in Montreal, Quebec, which resulted in
the payment of $83.7 million to Nortel. In connection with
these closings, we entered into promissory notes amounting to
$185.7 million, which are due in three quarterly payments
in calendar year 2005. We are currently in discussion with
Nortel regarding the timing of the cash payments associated with
the remaining factory transfers. We intend to use our cash
balances and revolving line of credit to fund the remaining
purchase price for the assets yet to be acquired.
Our working capital requirements and capital expenditures could
continue to increase in order to support future expansions of
our operations. In addition to the Nortel acquisition discussed
above, it is possible that future acquisitions may be
significant and may require the payment of cash. Future
liquidity needs will also depend on fluctuations in levels of
inventory, accounts receivable and accounts payable, the timing
of capital expenditures by us for new equipment, the extent to
which we utilize operating leases for the new facilities and
equipment, the extent of cash charges associated with future
restructuring activities and levels of shipments and changes in
volumes of customer orders.
On May 4, 2005, we announced our proposal to acquire all of
the outstanding publicly-held shares (approximately
10.4 million shares or 30%) of our India-based subsidiary,
Flextronics Software Systems Limited. We offered to acquire the
shares at Rs 575 per share ($13.23 per share), subject
to shareholder and regulatory approvals, including the number of
shares required for delisting being offered at this price. There
is no obligation for shareholders to accept this open offer and
there is no assurance that any shares will be offered for sale
to us. We reserve the right not to acquire the offered shares if
the final price, as determined by the Securities and Exchange
Board of India, is more than Rs 575 per share.
We continuously evaluate the strategic and financial
contributions of each of our operations and focus our primary
growth objectives on our core EMS vertically-integrated business
activities. We also assess opportunities to maximize shareholder
value with respect to our non-core activities through
divestitures, initial public offerings, spin-offs and other
strategic transactions. Consistent with this strategy, we
entered into an agreement in principle to merge our Flextronics
Network Services business with Telavie AS, a company
wholly-owned by Altor, a private equity firm focusing on
investments in the Nordic region. Under the terms of the
proposed merger, we would receive an undisclosed cash payment
plus additional contingent payments along with ownership of 30%
of the merged company.
We believe that our existing cash balances, together with
anticipated cash flows from operations and borrowings available
under our credit facility will be sufficient to fund our
operations and anticipated transactions through at least the
next twelve months. Historically, we have funded our operations
from the proceeds of public offerings of equity and debt
securities, cash and cash equivalents generated from operations,
bank debt, sales of accounts receivable and capital equipment
lease financings. We anticipate that we will continue to enter
into debt and equity financings, sales of accounts receivable
and lease transactions to fund
33
our acquisitions and anticipated growth. The sale of equity or
convertible debt securities could result in dilution to our
current shareholders. Further, we may issue debt securities that
have rights and privileges senior to those of holders of our
ordinary shares, and the terms of this debt could impose
restrictions on our operations. Such financings and other
transactions may not be available on terms acceptable to us or
at all.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
We have a revolving credit facility, which as of March 31,
2005, was in the amount of $1.1 billion, and under which we
had no borrowings outstanding as of March 31, 2005. On
May 27, 2005, we amended the credit facility to increase
the amount of the facility to $1.35 billion and to make
certain other changes. The amended credit facility consists of
two separate credit agreements, one providing for up to
$1.105 billion principal amount of revolving credit loans
to us and designated subsidiaries; and one providing for up to
$245.0 million principal amount of revolving credit loans
to a U.S. subsidiary of the Company. The amended credit
facility is a five-year facility expiring in May 2010.
Borrowings under the amended credit facility bear interest, at
our option, either at (i) the base rate (the greater of the
agents prime rate or 0.50% plus the federal funds rate)
plus the applicable margin for base rate loans ranging between
0.0% and 0.125%, based on our credit ratings; or (ii) the
LIBOR rate plus the applicable margin for LIBOR loans ranging
between 0.625% and 1.125%, based on our credit ratings. We are
required to pay a quarterly commitment fee ranging from 0.125%
to 0.250% per annum of the unutilized portion of the credit
facility and, if the utilized portion of the facility exceeds
33% of the total commitment, a quarterly utilization fee ranging
between 0.125% to 0.250% on such utilized portion, in each case
based on our credit ratings. We are also required to pay letter
of credit usage fees ranging between 0.625% and 1.125% per
annum (based on our credit ratings) on the amount of the daily
average outstanding letters of credit and issuance fees of
0.125% per annum on the daily average undrawn amount of letter
of credit.
The amended credit facility is unsecured, and contains certain
restrictions on our ability to (i) incur certain debt,
(ii) make certain investments, (iii) make certain
acquisitions of other entities, (iv) incur liens,
(v) dispose of assets, (vi) make non-cash
distributions to shareholders, and (vii) engage in
transactions with affiliates. These covenants are subject to a
number of significant exceptions and limitations. The amended
credit facility also requires that we maintain a maximum ratio
of total indebtedness to EBITDA (earnings before interest
expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization), and a minimum
fixed charge coverage ratio, as defined, during the term of the
credit facility. Borrowings under the credit facility are
guaranteed by us and certain of our subsidiaries.
As of March 31, 2005, our outstanding debt obligations
included: (i) borrowings outstanding related to our senior
subordinated notes, (ii) borrowings outstanding related to
our convertible junior subordinated notes, (iii) amounts
drawn by subsidiaries on various lines of credit,
(iv) equipment financed under capital leases and
(v) other term obligations. Additionally, we have leased
certain of our facilities under operating lease commitments.
Future payments due under our debt and lease obligations are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than | |
|
1 - 3 | |
|
4 - 5 | |
|
Greater Than | |
Contractual Obligations: |
|
Total | |
|
1 Year | |
|
Years | |
|
Years | |
|
5 Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Long term debt obligations
|
|
$ |
1,717,877 |
|
|
$ |
17,448 |
|
|
$ |
228,417 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,472,012 |
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
18,879 |
|
|
|
9,202 |
|
|
|
6,808 |
|
|
|
1,662 |
|
|
|
1,207 |
|
Operating leases, net of subleases
|
|
|
415,916 |
|
|
|
77,497 |
|
|
|
91,001 |
|
|
|
44,518 |
|
|
|
202,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$ |
2,152,672 |
|
|
$ |
104,147 |
|
|
$ |
326,226 |
|
|
$ |
46,180 |
|
|
$ |
1,676,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We continuously sell a designated pool of trade receivables to a
third party qualified special purpose entity, which in turn
sells an undivided ownership interest to a conduit, administered
by an unaffiliated financial institution. In addition to this
financial institution, we participate in the securitization
agreement as an investor in the conduit. We continue to service,
administer and collect the receivables on behalf of the special
purpose entity and receive a servicing fee of 1.0% of serviced
receivables per annum. We pay facility and commitment fees of up
to 0.24% for unused amounts and program fees of up to 0.34% of
outstanding
34
amounts. The securitization agreement allows the operating
subsidiaries participating in the securitization to receive a
cash payment for sold receivables, less a deferred purchase
price receivable. Our share of the total investment varies
depending on certain criteria, mainly the collection performance
on the sold receivables. The agreement, which expires in March
2006, is subject to annual renewal. Currently, the unaffiliated
financial institutions maximum investment limit is
$250.0 million. We sold $249.9 million of our accounts
receivable as of March 31, 2005, which represents the face
amount of the total outstanding trade receivables on all
designated customer accounts at that date. We received net cash
proceeds of $134.7 million from the unaffiliated financial
institutions for the sale of these receivables. We have a
recourse obligation that is limited to the deferred purchase
price receivable, which approximates 5% of the total sold
receivables, and our own investment participation, the total of
which was $123.1 million as of March 31, 2005.
Additionally, during fiscal year 2005, we sold approximately
$426.0 million of receivables to a banking institution with
limited recourse, which management believes is nominal. The
outstanding balance of sold receivables, not yet collected, was
$202.1 million as of March 31, 2005. The accounts
receivable balances that were sold were removed from the
consolidated balance sheet and are reflected as cash provided by
operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Since June 2003, neither we nor any of our subsidiaries have
made any loans to our executive officers. Prior to that time, we
extended loans to several of our executive officers. Each loan
was evidenced by a promissory note in our favor and was
generally secured by a deed of trust on property of the officer.
Certain notes were non-interest bearing and others had interest
rates ranging from 1.49% to 5.85%. There were no loans
outstanding from the Companys executive officers as of
March 31, 2005. The outstanding balance of the loans,
including accrued interest was approximately $9.5 million
as of March 31, 2004. Additionally, in connection with an
investment partnership, we made loans to several of our
executive officers to fund their contributions to the investment
partnership. Each loan was evidenced by a full-recourse
promissory note in our favor. Interest rates on the notes ranged
from 5.05% to 6.40%. The remaining balance of these loans,
including accrued interest, as of March 31, 2005 was
approximately $1.8 million.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB
No. 43, Chapter 4 (SFAS 151).
This statement amends the guidance of ARB. No 43, Chapter 4
Inventory Pricing and requires that abnormal amounts
of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted
material be recognized as current period charges. In addition,
this statement requires that allocation of fixed production
overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal
capacity of the production facilities. SFAS 151 is
effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2005. We do not anticipate that
the implementation of this standard will have a material impact
on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
|
|
|
Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign
Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004 |
FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 109-2,
Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign
Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004 (FSP 109-2), provides
guidance under SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes, with respect to recording the potential
impact of the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004 (the Jobs Act) on income tax
expense and deferred tax liabilities. The Jobs Act was enacted
on October 22, 2004. FSP 109-2 states that an
enterprise is allowed time beyond the financial reporting period
of enactment to evaluate the effect of the Jobs Act on its plan
for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings for
purposes of applying SFAS No. 109. We are currently
assessing the impact of this provision and have not determined
whether to
35
elect to apply it. Any effect on our tax accounts will be
reflected in the quarter in which a decision is made to apply
the provision.
In December 2004, the FASB issued a revision of
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation. The revision is referred to as
FAS 123R Share-Based Payment,
effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15,
2005. On April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange
Commission (or the SEC) adopted a rule amendment
that delayed the compliance dates for FAS 123R such that we
are now allowed to adopt the new standard no later than
April 1, 2006. FAS 123R supersedes APB Opinion
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, (or APB 25) and will require
companies to recognize compensation expense, using a fair-value
based method, for costs related to share-based payments
including stock options and stock issued under our employee
stock purchase plans. We are currently evaluating option
valuation methodologies and assumptions in light of
FAS 123R; the methodologies and assumptions we ultimately
use to adopt FAS 123R may be different than those currently
used as discussed below in Note 2, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements included in Item 8, Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data. We currently expect
that the adoption of FAS 123R will have a material impact
on our consolidated results of operations.
|
|
|
Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets |
On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued Statement
No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an
amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary
Transactions. SFAS No. 153 addresses the
measurement of exchanges of nonmonetary assets and redefines the
scope of transactions that should be measured based on the fair
value of the assets exchanged. SFAS No. 153 is
effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal
periods beginning after June 15, 2005. We do not believe
adoption of SFAS No. 153 will have a material effect
on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
|
|
|
Implicit Variable Interests under FASB Interpretation
No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities |
In March 2005, the FASB issued FSP No. 46(R)-5,
Implicit Variable Interests under FASB Interpretation
No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities (FSP 46(R)-5), which
provides guidance for a reporting enterprise on whether it holds
an implicit variable interest in a variable interest entity
(VIE) or potential VIE when specific conditions exist. FSP
46(R)-5 is effective the first period beginning after
March 3, 2005. We are currently evaluating the effect that
the adoption of FSP 46(R)-5 will have on our consolidated
results of operations and financial condition but do not expect
it to have a material impact.
|
|
ITEM 7A. |
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK |
INTEREST RATE RISK
A portion of our exposure to market risk for changes in interest
rates relates to our investment portfolio. We do not use
derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. We
place cash and cash equivalents with various major financial
institutions and limit the amount of credit exposure to the
greater of 20% of the total investment portfolio or
$10.0 million in any single institution. We protect our
invested principal funds by limiting default risk, market risk
and reinvestment risk. We mitigate default risk by investing in
investment grade securities and by constantly positioning the
portfolio to respond appropriately to a reduction in credit
rating of any investment issuer, guarantor or depository to
levels below the credit ratings dictated by our investment
policy. The portfolio includes only marketable securities with
active secondary or resale markets to ensure portfolio
liquidity. Maturities of short-term investments are timed,
whenever possible, to correspond with debt payments and capital
investments. As of March 31, 2005, the outstanding amount
in the investment portfolio was $168.2 million, comprised
mainly of money market funds with an average return of 2.57% for
36
dollar investments and 1.97% for Euro investments. A
hypothetical 10% change in interest rates would not have a
material effect on our financial position, results of operations
and cash flows over the next fiscal year.
We issued $500.0 million of 6.25% senior subordinated
notes due in November 2014. Interest is payable semiannually on
May 15 and November 15. We entered into interest rate swap
transactions to effectively convert a portion of the fixed
interest rate debt to a variable rate debt. The swaps, which
expire in 2014, are accounted for as fair value hedges under
SFAS 133. The notional amounts of the swaps total
$400.0 million. Under the terms of the swaps, we will pay
an interest rate equal to the six-month LIBOR rate, set in
arrears, plus a fixed spread of 1.37% to 1.52%. In exchange, we
will receive a payment based on a fixed rate of 6.25%. At
March 31, 2005, $9.7 million has been recorded in
other current assets to record the fair value of the interest
rate swaps, with a corresponding decrease to the carrying value
of the 6.25% senior subordinated notes on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet.
We had a portfolio of fixed and variable rate debt of
approximately $1.7 billion as of March 31, 2005, of
which approximately 66% related to fixed rate debt obligations.
Our fixed rate debt consists primarily of $414.7 million of
senior subordinated notes with a weighted average interest rate
of 6.62%, $200.0 million of zero coupon, zero yield,
convertible junior subordinated notes, $500 million of 1%
coupon convertible subordinated notes, and $13.7 million of
other fixed rate obligations. As of March 31, 2005, the
approximate fair values of our 9.875% notes,
9.75% notes, 6.5% notes, 6.25% notes, and
1% convertible notes based on broker trading prices were
98.625%, 106.5%, 99.25%, 95.0% and 99.0% of their face values on
March 31, 2005, respectively. Our variable rate debt
includes demand notes, mortgage loans and certain variable lines
of credit. These credit lines are located throughout the world
and are based on a spread over that countrys inter
bank-offering rate. Our variable rate debt instruments create
exposures for us related to interest rate risk. As of
March 31, 2005, the balance outstanding on our variable
rate debt obligation was approximately $589.4 million. A
hypothetical 10% change in interest rates would not have a
material effect on our financial position, results of operations
and cash flows over the next fiscal year.
FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RISK
We transact business in various foreign countries and are,
therefore, subject to risk of foreign currency exchange rate
fluctuations. We have established a foreign currency risk
management policy to manage this risk. To the extent possible,
we manage our foreign currency exposure by evaluating and using
non-financial techniques, such as currency of invoice, leading
and lagging payments and receivable management. In addition, we
borrow in various foreign currencies and enter into short-term
foreign currency forward contracts to hedge only those currency
exposures associated with certain assets and liabilities, mainly
accounts receivable and accounts payable, and cash flows
denominated in non-functional currencies.
We try to maintain a fully hedged position for certain
transaction exposures. These exposures are primarily, but not
limited to, revenues, customer and vendor payments and
inter-company balances in currencies other than the functional
currency unit of the operating entity. The credit risk of our
foreign currency forward contracts is minimized since all
contracts are with large financial institutions. The gains and
losses on forward contracts generally offset the gains and
losses on the assets, liabilities and transactions hedged. The
fair value of currency forward contracts is reported on the
balance sheet. The aggregate notional amount of outstanding
contracts as of March 31, 2005 amounted to
$2.4 billion with a fair value on the balance sheet of
other current assets of $13.4 million. The majority of
these foreign exchange contracts expire in less than one month
and almost all expire within six months. They will settle in
Euro, British pound, Hungarian forint, Japanese yen, Malaysian
ringgit, Norwegian kronor, Polish zloty, Singapore dollar, South
African rand, Swedish krona, Swiss franc, Thai baht and
U.S. dollar.
Based on our overall currency rate exposures at March 31,
2005, including derivative financial instruments and
nonfunctional currency-denominated receivables and payables, a
near-term 10% appreciation or depreciation of the
U.S. dollar would not have a material effect on our
financial position, results of operations and cash flows over
the next fiscal year.
37
|
|
ITEM 8. |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Flextronics International Ltd.
Singapore
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Flextronics International Ltd. and Subsidiaries (the
Company) as of March 31, 2005 and 2004, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive
income (loss), shareholders equity, and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2005.
Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement
schedule listed in Item 15(a)(2). These financial
statements and financial statement schedule are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial
statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Company as of March 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended March 31, 2005, in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of March 31, 2005, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission and our report dated June 14, 2005
expressed an unqualified opinion on managements assessment
of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting and an unqualified opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
San Jose, California
June 14, 2005
38
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands except | |
|
|
per share amounts) | |
ASSETS |
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
869,258 |
|
|
$ |
615,276 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of
$31,166 and $38,736 as of March 31, 2005, and 2004,
respectively
|
|
|
1,842,010 |
|
|
|
1,871,637 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,518,866 |
|
|
|
1,179,513 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
12,117 |
|
|
|
14,244 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
544,914 |
|
|
|
581,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
4,787,165 |
|
|
|
4,261,733 |
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,704,516 |
|
|
|
1,625,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
684,952 |
|
|
|
604,785 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
3,359,477 |
|
|
|
2,653,372 |
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
142,712 |
|
|
|
68,060 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
328,750 |
|
|
|
370,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
11,007,572 |
|
|
$ |
9,583,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
17,448 |
|
|
$ |
96,287 |
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
8,718 |
|
|
|
8,203 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
2,523,269 |
|
|
|
2,145,174 |
|
|
Accrued payroll
|
|
|
285,504 |
|
|
|
263,949 |
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
1,045,255 |
|
|
|
863,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
3,880,194 |
|
|
|
3,376,917 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
1,700,429 |
|
|
|
1,609,177 |
|
Capital lease obligation, net of current portion
|
|
|
9,141 |
|
|
|
15,084 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
193,760 |
|
|
|
215,546 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares, S$0.01 par value; authorized
1,500,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding
568,329,662 and 529,944,282 shares as of March 31,
2005, and 2004, respectively
|
|
|
3,360 |
|
|
|
3,135 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
5,486,404 |
|
|
|
5,014,990 |
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(382,600 |
) |
|
|
(722,471 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
123,683 |
|
|
|
78,105 |
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
(6,799 |
) |
|
|
(6,546 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
5,224,048 |
|
|
|
4,367,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
11,007,572 |
|
|
$ |
9,583,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
39
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
15,908,223 |
|
|
$ |
14,530,416 |
|
|
$ |
13,378,699 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
14,827,860 |
|
|
|
13,704,576 |
|
|
|
12,650,402 |
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
78,381 |
|
|
|
477,305 |
|
|
|
266,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,001,982 |
|
|
|
348,535 |
|
|
|
462,053 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
568,533 |
|
|
|
487,287 |
|
|
|
456,199 |
|
Intangibles amortization
|
|
|
42,520 |
|
|
|
36,715 |
|
|
|
22,146 |
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
16,978 |
|
|
|
63,043 |
|
|
|
30,711 |
|
Other charges (income), net
|
|
|
(13,491 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,456 |
|
Interest and other expense, net
|
|
|
94,205 |
|
|
|
77,700 |
|
|
|
92,780 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
16,328 |
|
|
|
103,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
276,909 |
|
|
|
(420,119 |
) |
|
|
(147,239 |
) |
Benefit from income taxes
|
|
|
(62,962 |
) |
|
|
(67,741 |
) |
|
|
(63,786 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
339,871 |
|
|
$ |
(352,378 |
) |
|
$ |
(83,453 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
(0.67 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
(0.67 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing per share amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
552,920 |
|
|
|
525,318 |
|
|
|
517,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
585,499 |
|
|
|
525,318 |
|
|
|
517,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
40
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
339,871 |
|
|
$ |
(352,378 |
) |
|
$ |
(83,453 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes
|
|
|
56,255 |
|
|
|
105,963 |
|
|
|
127,518 |
|
|
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on investments and derivative
instruments, net of taxes
|
|
|
(10,677 |
) |
|
|
5,561 |
|
|
|
(1,223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$ |
385,449 |
|
|
$ |
(240,854 |
) |
|
$ |
42,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
41
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-In | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Income | |
|
Deferred | |
|
Shareholders | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Capital | |
|
Deficit | |
|
(Loss) | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
BALANCE AT MARCH 31, 2002
|
|
|
513,012 |
|
|
$ |
3,043 |
|
|
$ |
4,898,807 |
|
|
$ |
(286,640 |
) |
|
$ |
(159,714 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,455,496 |
|
|
Issuance of ordinary shares for acquisitions
|
|
|
1,639 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
14,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,712 |
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
4,567 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
17,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,996 |
|
|
Ordinary shares issued under Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
9,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,889 |
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83,453 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83,453 |
) |
|
Deferred stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,223 |
) |
|
Foreign currency translation, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT MARCH 31, 2003
|
|
|
520,228 |
|
|
|
3,078 |
|
|
|
4,948,601 |
|
|
|
(370,093 |
) |
|
|
(33,419 |
) |
|
|
(6,147 |
) |
|
|
4,542,020 |
|
|
Issuance of ordinary shares for acquisitions
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,162 |
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
8,235 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
54,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,825 |
|
|
Ordinary shares issued under Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,288 |
|
|
Issuance of restricted ordinary shares
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(352,378 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(352,378 |
) |
|
Deferred stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
Unrealized gain on investments and derivative instruments, net
of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,561 |
|
|
Foreign currency translation, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT MARCH 31, 2004
|
|
|
529,944 |
|
|
|
3,135 |
|
|
|
5,014,990 |
|
|
|
(722,471 |
) |
|
|
78,105 |
|
|
|
(6,546 |
) |
|
|
4,367,213 |
|
|
Issuance of ordinary shares for acquisitions
|
|
|
10,004 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
127,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,226 |
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
3,182 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
29,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,784 |
|
|
Modification of stock option grants (Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,575 |
|
|
Ordinary shares issued under Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,817 |
|
|
Sales of ordinary shares in public offering, net of offering
costs of $4,636
|
|
|
24,331 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
299,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299,500 |
|
|
Issuance of restricted ordinary shares
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
339,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
339,871 |
|
|
Deferred stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,155 |
|
|
|
2,155 |
|
|
Unrealized loss on investments and derivative instruments, net
of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,677 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,677 |
) |
|
Foreign currency translation, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT MARCH 31, 2005
|
|
|
568,330 |
|
|
$ |
3,360 |
|
|
$ |
5,486,404 |
|
|
$ |
(382,600 |
) |
|
$ |
123,683 |
|
|
$ |
(6,799 |
) |
|
$ |
5,224,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
42
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
339,871 |
|
|
$ |
(352,378 |
) |
|
$ |
(83,453 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and impairment charges
|
|
|
373,670 |
|
|
|
662,798 |
|
|
|
419,086 |
|
|
Gain on sale of equipment
|
|
|
(1,752 |
) |
|
|
(2,206 |
) |
|
|
(1,200 |
) |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
4,848 |
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
2,647 |
|
|
Equity in earnings (losses) of associated companies and other
charges
|
|
|
2,785 |
|
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
27,086 |
|
|
Amortization of deferred stock compensation
|
|
|
2,155 |
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(84,070 |
) |
|
|
(97,171 |
) |
|
|
(92,798 |
) |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
110,907 |
|
|
|
(381,948 |
) |
|
|
496,193 |
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(105,126 |
) |
|
|
(40,302 |
) |
|
|
189,601 |
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
61,341 |
|
|
|
(139,691 |
) |
|
|
127,535 |
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other current liabilities
|
|
|
19,636 |
|
|
|
535,749 |
|
|
|
(477,998 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
724,265 |
|
|
|
187,698 |
|
|
|
607,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment, net of disposition
|
|
|
(289,680 |
) |
|
|
(181,461 |
) |
|
|
(208,311 |
) |
|
Purchases of OEM facilities and related assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,143 |
) |
|
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(469,003 |
) |
|
|
(119,983 |
) |
|
|
(501,602 |
) |
|
Other investments and notes receivable
|
|
|
20,406 |
|
|
|
(102,323 |
) |
|
|
(94,990 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(738,277 |
) |
|
|
(403,767 |
) |
|
|
(813,046 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank borrowings and proceeds from long-term debt
|
|
|
1,793,969 |
|
|
|
1,446,592 |
|
|
|
892,961 |
|
|
Repayments of bank borrowings and long-term debt
|
|
|
(1,789,862 |
) |
|
|
(1,008,692 |
) |
|
|
(1,000,159 |
) |
|
Repayment of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(10,672 |
) |
|
|
(12,613 |
) |
|
|
(24,231 |
) |
|
Payment for early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(13,201 |
) |
|
|
(91,647 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and Employee Stock
Purchase Plan
|
|
|
36,601 |
|
|
|
61,113 |
|
|
|
27,885 |
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of ordinary shares in public offering
|
|
|
299,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
316,335 |
|
|
|
394,753 |
|
|
|
(103,544 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate on cash
|
|
|
(48,341 |
) |
|
|
12,572 |
|
|
|
(12,298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
253,982 |
|
|
|
191,256 |
|
|
|
(321,104 |
) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
615,276 |
|
|
|
424,020 |
|
|
|
745,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$ |
869,258 |
|
|
$ |
615,276 |
|
|
$ |
424,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
43
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1. |
ORGANIZATION OF THE COMPANY |
Flextronics International Ltd. (Flextronics or the
Company) was incorporated in the Republic of
Singapore in May 1990. The Company is a leading provider of
advanced electronics manufacturing services (EMS) to
original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) for a broad range of
products in the following industries: handheld devices,
computers and office automation, communications infrastructure,
consumer devices, information technology infrastructure,
industrial, automotive and medical. The Companys strategy
is to provide customers with a complete range of vertically
integrated global supply chain services through which the
Company designs, builds and ships a complete packaged product
for its OEM customers. The Companys OEM customers leverage
the Companys services to meet their product requirements
throughout the entire product life cycle. The Company also
provides after-market services such as repair and warranty
services as well as network and communications installation and
maintenance.
In addition to the assembly of printed circuit boards and
complete systems and products, the Companys manufacturing
services include the fabrication and assembly of plastic and
metal enclosures, the fabrication of printed circuit boards and
backplanes and the fabrication and assembly of photonics
components. The Company also provides contract design and
related engineering services offerings to its customers, from
full product development to system integration,
industrialization, product cost reduction and software
application development. These services include industrial and
mechanical design, hardware design, embedded and application
software development, semiconductor design, and system
validation and test development.
In addition, the Company offers a comprehensive range of
value-added design services for its customers that range from
contract design services (CDS), where the customer purchases
services on a time and materials, to original product design and
manufacturing services, where the customer purchases a product
that was designed, developed and manufactured by the Company
that the Company may customize to provide the customer with a
unique look and feel (commonly referred to as
original design manufacturing, or ODM). ODM products
are then sold by the Companys OEM customers under the
OEMs brand name.
|
|
2. |
SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
|
|
Basis of Presentation and Principles of
Consolidation |
The Companys fiscal year ends on March 31 of each
year. Interim quarterly reporting periods end on the Friday
closest to the last day of each fiscal quarter, except the third
and fourth fiscal quarters which end on December 31 and
March 31, respectively.
Amounts included in the financial statements are expressed in
U.S. dollars unless otherwise designated as Singapore
dollars (S$) or Euros
().
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Flextronics and its wholly and majority-owned
subsidiaries, after elimination of all significant intercompany
accounts and transactions. For consolidated majority-owned
subsidiaries in which the Company owns less than 100%, the
Company records minority interest to account for the ownership
interest of the minority owner. The Company recorded
$40.8 million and $11.9 million as of March 31,
2005 and 2004, respectively, of minority interest, which are
included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance
sheets. The associated minority interest expense has not been
material to the Companys results of operations for fiscal
years 2005, 2004 and 2003, and was classified as interest and
other expense, net, in the consolidated statements of operations.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial
44
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates and assumptions.
|
|
|
Translation of Foreign Currencies |
The financial position and results of operations of certain of
the Companys subsidiaries are measured using a currency
other than the U.S. dollar as their functional currency.
Accordingly, for these subsidiaries all assets and liabilities
are translated into U.S. dollars at the current exchange
rates as of the respective balance sheet date. Revenue and
expense items are translated at the average exchange rates
prevailing during the period. Cumulative gains and losses from
the translation of these subsidiaries financial statements
are reported as a separate component of shareholders
equity. During fiscal year 2005, the Company realized a foreign
exchange gain of $29.3 million from the liquidation of
certain international entities. This gain was classified as a
component of other charges (income), net, in the consolidated
statement of operations.
Manufacturing revenue is recognized when the goods are shipped
by the Company or received by its customer, title and risk of
ownership have been passed, the price to the buyer is fixed or
determinable and recoverability is reasonably assured. Service
revenue is recognized when the services have been performed.
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
All highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or
less from original dates of purchase are carried at fair market
value and considered to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash
equivalents consist of cash deposited in checking and money
market accounts and certificates of deposit.
Cash and cash equivalents consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash and bank balances
|
|
$ |
832,290 |
|
|
$ |
596,259 |
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
15,911 |
|
|
|
14,501 |
|
Certificates of deposits
|
|
|
21,057 |
|
|
|
4,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
869,258 |
|
|
$ |
615,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company also has certain investments in non-publicly traded
technology companies. These investments are included within
other assets in the Companys consolidated balance sheet
and are carried at cost. As of March 31, 2005 and 2004, the
investments totaled $52.5 million and $41.9 million,
respectively. The Company continuously monitors these
investments for impairment and makes appropriate reductions in
carrying values when necessary. During fiscal year 2005 and
2003, the Company recorded charges of $8.2 million and
$7.4 million, respectively, for other than temporary
impairment of its investments in certain of these non-publicly
traded technology companies. No impairment charges were recorded
in fiscal year 2004.
|
|
|
Concentration of Credit Risk |
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk, are primarily accounts
receivable, cash and cash equivalents, investments, and
derivative instruments.
45
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its
customers financial condition and makes provisions for
doubtful accounts based on the outcome of its credit
evaluations. The Company generally does not require collateral
for sales on credit. Management believes that credit risks are
moderated by the financial stability of the Companys end
customers and the diverse geographic sales areas. In fiscal year
2005, Sony-Ericsson and Hewlett-Packard accounted for
approximately 14% and 10% of net sales, respectively. In fiscal
year 2004, Sony-Ericsson and Hewlett-Packard each accounted for
approximately 12% of the net sales. In fiscal year 2003,
Sony-Ericsson and Hewlett-Packard accounted for approximately
11% and 12% of net sales, respectively. No other customer
accounted for more than 10% of net sales in the periods ended
March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003. The Companys ten
largest customers accounted for approximately 62%, 64% and 67%
of its net sales, in fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. At March 31, 2005, Sony-Ericsson and
Hewlett-Packard each accounted for approximately 10% of net
accounts receivable. At March 31, 2004, Hewlett-Packard
accounted for approximately 10% of net accounts receivable.
The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents with various
financial institutions that management believes to be of high
credit quality. These financial institutions are located in many
different locations throughout the world. The Companys
cash equivalents are comprised of cash deposited in money market
accounts and certificates of deposit. The Companys
investment policy limits the amount of credit exposure to 20% of
the total investment portfolio in any single issuer.
The amount subject to credit risk related to derivative
instruments are generally limited to the amount, if any, by
which a counterpartys obligations exceed the obligations
of the Company with that counterparty. To manage the
counterparty risk, the Company limits its derivative
transactions to those with recognized financial institutions.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (on a first-in,
first-out basis) or market value. Cost is comprised of direct
materials, labor and overhead. The components of inventories,
net of applicable lower of cost or market provisions, were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Raw materials
|
|
$ |
711,251 |
|
|
$ |
622,905 |
|
Work-in-progress
|
|
|
306,833 |
|
|
|
242,435 |
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
500,782 |
|
|
|
314,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,518,866 |
|
|
$ |
1,179,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation and
amortization are provided on a straight-line basis over the
estimated useful lives of the related assets (three to thirty
years), with the exception of building leasehold improvements,
which are amortized over the term of the lease, if shorter.
Effective October 1, 2004, the estimated useful lives of
certain machinery and equipment were changed from five years to
seven years. The use of these assets and the advancement of the
associated technology have demonstrated that seven years is a
more reasonable and accurate economic useful life, so the
Company has aligned the depreciation expense associated with
these assets with their future economic benefit. As a result of
this change in estimated useful life, the Company recognized
lower depreciation expense of approximately $12.0 million
in fiscal year 2005 (than would have been recognized without the
change in useful life) and anticipates recognizing lower
depreciation expense of $20.7 million and
$11.5 million in fiscal years 2006 and 2007, respectively,
and higher depreciation expenses of $1.2 million,
$10.7 million, $17.1 million, $12.1 million and
$3.2 million in fiscal
46
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
years 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively. Repairs and
maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Property and
equipment was comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Machinery and equipment
|
|
$ |
1,451,083 |
|
|
$ |
1,333,578 |
|
Buildings
|
|
|
767,120 |
|
|
|
741,692 |
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
100,218 |
|
|
|
86,133 |
|
Computer equipment and software
|
|
|
261,249 |
|
|
|
232,129 |
|
Land and other
|
|
|
370,063 |
|
|
|
358,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,949,733 |
|
|
|
2,752,178 |
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(1,245,217 |
) |
|
|
(1,127,178 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$ |
1,704,516 |
|
|
$ |
1,625,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation expense associated with property and
equipment amounted to approximately $309.0 million,
$311.4 million and $327.4 million in fiscal years
2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The Company reviews property and equipment for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of property and equipment is measured by
comparing its carrying amount to the projected undiscounted cash
flows the property and equipment are expected to generate. An
impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of a
long-lived asset exceeds the fair value of the underlying asset.
The Company provides for income taxes in accordance with the
asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under
this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax
consequences of temporary differences by applying
the applicable statutory tax rate to such differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of
existing assets and liabilities.
|
|
|
Goodwill and Other Intangibles |
Goodwill of the reporting units is tested for impairment on
January 31st and whenever events or changes in
circumstance indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill may
not be recoverable. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the
reporting unit level by comparing the reporting units
carrying amount, including goodwill, to the fair value of the
reporting unit. Reporting units represent components of the
Company for which discrete financial information is available to
management, and for which management regularly reviews the
operating results. For purposes of the annual goodwill
impairment evaluation, the Company has identified two separate
reporting units: Electronic Manufacturing Services and Network
Services. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds
its fair value, a second step is performed to measure the amount
of impairment loss, if any. Further, in the event that the
carrying amount of the Company as a whole is greater than its
market capitalization, there is a potential likelihood that some
or all of its goodwill would be considered impaired. The Company
completed the annual impairment test during its fourth quarter
of fiscal year 2005 and determined that no impairment existed as
of the date of the impairment test.
47
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes the activity in the
Companys goodwill account during fiscal years 2005 and
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Balance, beginning of the year
|
|
$ |
2,653,372 |
|
|
$ |
2,121,997 |
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
594,691 |
|
|
|
450,959 |
|
|
Reclassification to other intangible assets*
|
|
|
(5,270 |
) |
|
|
(2,381 |
) |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
116,684 |
|
|
|
82,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of the year
|
|
$ |
3,359,477 |
|
|
$ |
2,653,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Reclassification resulting from the completion of the final
allocation of the Companys intangible assets acquired
through certain business combinations in a period subsequent to
the respective period of acquisition, based on the completion of
third-party valuations. |
All of the Companys acquired intangible assets are subject
to amortization over their estimated useful lives. The
Companys intangible assets are reviewed for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate that the
carrying amount of an intangible may not be recoverable.
Intangible assets are comprised of contractual agreements,
patents and trademarks, developed technologies, customer
relationships and other acquired intangibles. Contractual
agreements, patents and trademarks, and developed technologies
are amortized on a straight-line basis up to ten years. Other
acquired intangibles related to favorable leases and customer
relationships are amortized on a straight-line basis over three
to ten years. No residual value is estimated for the intangible
assets. During fiscal year 2005, there were approximately
$113.2 million of additions to intangible assets, primarily
related to certain customer relationships and certain
contractual agreements. During fiscal year 2004, there were
$27.1 million of additions to intangible assets, primarily
related to purchased patents, license agreements and certain
contractual agreements. The value of the Companys
intangible assets purchased through business combinations is
principally determined based on third-party valuations of the
net assets acquired. The Company is in the process of
determining the value of its intangible assets acquired from
certain acquisitions completed in fiscal year 2005 and expects
to complete this by the end of the first quarter of fiscal year
2006. The components of intangible assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
March 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
Net | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
Net | |
|
|
Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Carrying | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
|
(In thousands) | |
Intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual agreements
|
|
$ |
104,383 |
|
|
$ |
(58,221 |
) |
|
$ |
46,162 |
|
|
$ |
77,706 |
|
|
$ |
(31,584 |
) |
|
$ |
46,122 |
|
|
Patents and trademarks
|
|
|
8,082 |
|
|
|
(1,688 |
) |
|
|
6,394 |
|
|
|
2,611 |
|
|
|
(536 |
) |
|
|
2,075 |
|
|
Developed technologies
|
|
|
11,812 |
|
|
|
(1,231 |
) |
|
|
10,581 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
416 |
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
71,353 |
|
|
|
(4,342 |
) |
|
|
67,011 |
|
|
|
3,286 |
|
|
|
(426 |
) |
|
|
2,860 |
|
|
Other acquired intangibles
|
|
|
32,619 |
|
|
|
(20,055 |
) |
|
|
12,564 |
|
|
|
28,234 |
|
|
|
(11,647 |
) |
|
|
16,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
228,249 |
|
|
$ |
(85,537 |
) |
|
$ |
142,712 |
|
|
$ |
112,337 |
|
|
$ |
(44,277 |
) |
|
$ |
68,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Total intangible amortization expense recorded during fiscal
years 2005, 2004 and 2003 amounted to $42.5 million,
$36.7 million and $22.1 million, respectively.
Expected future estimated annual amortization expense is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ending March 31, |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
2006
|
|
$ |
37,547 |
|
2007
|
|
|
22,336 |
|
2008
|
|
|
19,082 |
|
2009
|
|
|
14,813 |
|
2010
|
|
|
13,876 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
35,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization expenses
|
|
$ |
142,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities |
The Company accounts for derivative instruments and hedging
activities in accordance with SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, as amended by SFAS No. 138,
Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an Amendment of SFAS 133 and
No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. All
derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at fair
value. If the derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge, the
effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative
is recorded in shareholders equity as a separate component
of accumulated other comprehensive income and is recognized in
the statement of operations when the hedged item affects
earnings. Ineffective portions of changes in the fair value of
cash flow hedges are immediately recognized in earnings. If the
derivative is designated as a fair value hedge, the changes in
the fair value of the derivative and of the hedged item
attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in earnings in
the current period.
|
|
|
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation |
The Company currently maintains four stock-based employee
compensation plans, which are more fully described in
Note 8, Shareholders Equity. The Company
accounts for its stock option awards to employees under the
recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles
Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees and related interpretations. No
compensation expense is recorded for options granted in which
the exercise price equals or exceeds the market price of the
underlying stock on the date of grant in accordance with the
provisions of APB Opinion No. 25.
On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payments
(SFAS 123R). SFAS 123R eliminates the
alternative of applying the intrinsic value measurement
provisions of Opinion 25 to stock compensation awards issued to
employees and requires companies to measure the cost of employee
services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments
based on the grant-date fair value of the award. That cost will
be recognized over the period during which an employee is
required to provide services in exchange for the award (usually
the vesting period).
SFAS 123(R) permits public companies to adopt its
requirements using one of two methods:
|
|
|
1. Modified Prospective Application Method: Under this
method SFAS 123R is applied to new awards and to awards
modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the effective date.
Compensation cost for the portion of awards for which service
has not been rendered (such as unvested options) that are
outstanding as of the date of adoption shall be recognized as
the remaining services are rendered. The |
49
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
compensation cost relating to unvested awards at the date of
adoption shall be based on the grant-date fair value of those
awards as calculated for pro forma disclosures under the
original SFAS 123. |
|
|
2. Modified Retrospective Application Method: Companies may
also use the Modified Retrospective Application Method for all
prior years for which the original SFAS 123 was effective
or only to prior interim periods in the year of initial
adoption. If the Modified Retrospective Application Method is
applied, financial statements for prior periods shall be
adjusted to give effect to the fair-value-based method of
accounting for awards on a consistent basis with the pro forma
disclosures required for those periods under the original
SFAS 123. |
On April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission
(or the SEC) adopted a rule amendment that delayed
the compliance dates for SFAS 123R such that the Company is
now allowed to adopt the new standard no later than
April 1, 2006. The Company has not yet quantified the
effects of the adoption of SFAS 123R, but it is expected
that it will result in significant stock-based compensation
expense. The pro forma effects on net income (loss) and earnings
(loss) per share if the Company had applied the fair value
recognition provisions of original SFAS 123 on stock
compensation awards (rather than applying the intrinsic value
measurement provisions of Opinion 25) are disclosed in the
following table. Although such pro forma effects of applying
original SFAS 123 may be indicative of the effects of
adopting SFAS 123R, the provisions of these two statements
differ in some important respects. The actual effects of
adopting SFAS 123R will be dependent on numerous factors
including, but not limited to, the valuation model chosen by the
Company to value stock-based awards; the assumed award
forfeiture rate; the accounting policies adopted concerning the
method of recognizing the fair value of awards over the service
period; and the transition method chosen for adopting
SFAS 123R. The Company is currently evaluating option
valuation methodologies and assumptions in light of
SFAS 123R.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Net income (loss), as reported
|
|
$ |
339,871 |
|
|
$ |
(352,378 |
) |
|
$ |
(83,453 |
) |
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included
in reported net income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
2,155 |
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
1,085 |
|
Less: Fair value compensation costs, net of taxes
|
|
|
(175,981 |
) |
|
|
(54,623 |
) |
|
|
(72,911 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
166,045 |
|
|
$ |
(405,229 |
) |
|
$ |
(155,279 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
(0.67 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
(0.77 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
(0.67 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
(0.77 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On January 17, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors
approved accelerating the vesting of all out-of-the-money,
unvested options to purchase the Companys ordinary shares
held by current employees, including executive officers. No
options held by non-employee directors were subject to the
acceleration. All options priced above $12.98, the closing price
of the Companys ordinary shares on January 17, 2005,
were considered to be out-of-the-money. The acceleration was
effective as of January 17, 2005, provided that holders of
incentive stock options (ISOs) within the meaning of
Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, had the opportunity to decline the acceleration of ISO
options in order to prevent changing the status of the ISO
option for federal income tax purposes to a non-qualified stock
option.
50
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The acceleration of these options was done primarily to
eliminate future compensation expense the Company would
otherwise recognize in its income statement with respect to
these options upon the adoption of SFAS 123R. In addition,
because these options have exercise prices in excess of current
market values and are not fully achieving their original
objectives of incentive compensation and employee retention,
management believes that the acceleration may have a positive
effect on employee morale and retention. The future expense that
was eliminated was approximately $121.2 million (of which
approximately $26.4 million is attributable to options held
by executive officers). This amount is reflected in the pro
forma footnote disclosure above.
In accordance with the disclosure provisions of
SFAS No. 123, the fair value of employee stock options
granted during fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003 were estimated
at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model and the
following weighted average assumptions. The fiscal year 2003 pro
forma net loss and net loss per share presented above have been
revised. The changes did not impact the Companys
consolidated statements of operations in 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Volatility
|
|
|
79.4% |
|
|
|
84.8% |
|
|
|
77.0% |
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.0% |
|
|
|
2.3% |
|
|
|
3.8% |
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
Expected option lives
|
|
|
3.8 years |
|
|
|
3.8 years |
|
|
|
3.6 years |
|
In fiscal year 2003, 2004 and the first nine months of fiscal
year 2005, the Company used its historical volatility as its
basis to estimate expected volatility. In light of recent
accounting guidance related to stock options, the Company
reevaluated the volatility assumptions used to estimate the
value of employee stock options granted in the fourth quarter of
fiscal year 2005. Management determined that implied volatility
related to publicly traded options is more reflective of market
conditions and a better indicator of expected volatility than
historical volatility. As such, the volatility in fiscal year
2005 reflected a prospective change in volatility beginning in
the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005.
The following weighted average assumptions are used in
estimating fair value related to shares issued under employee
stock purchase plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Volatility
|
|
|
41.3% |
|
|
|
44.0% |
|
|
|
44.0% |
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.7% |
|
|
|
1.4% |
|
|
|
1.1% |
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
Expected option lives
|
|
|
0.5 years |
|
|
|
0.5 years |
|
|
|
0.5 years |
|
Due to the subjective nature of the assumptions used in the
Black-Scholes model, the pro forma net loss and net loss per
share disclosures may not reflect the associated fair value of
the outstanding options.
The Company provides restricted stock grants to key employees
under its 2002 Interim Incentive Plan. Shares awarded under the
plan vest in installments over a five-year period and unvested
shares are forfeited upon termination of employment. During
fiscal year 2005, 175,000 shares of restricted stock were
granted with a fair value on the date of grant of
$13.58 per share. During fiscal year 2004,
230,000 shares of restricted stock were granted with a fair
value on the date of grant of $10.88 per share. During
fiscal year 2003, 1,230,000 shares of restricted stock were
granted with a fair value on the date of grant of $5.88 per
share. The unearned compensation associated with the restricted
stock grants was $6.8 million and $6.5 million as of
March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004, respectively. The
amounts are included in shareholders equity as a component
of additional paid-in capital. Grants of restricted stock are
recorded as compensation expense over
51
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the vesting period at the fair market value of the stock at the
date of grant. In fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003, compensation
expense related to the restricted stock grants amounted to
$2.2 million, $1.8 million and $1.1 million,
respectively.
|
|
|
Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed using the weighted
average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the
applicable periods.
Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed using the weighted
average number of ordinary shares and dilutive ordinary share
equivalents outstanding during the applicable periods. Ordinary
share equivalents include ordinary shares issuable upon the
exercise of stock options, and are computed using the treasury
stock method, as well as shares issuable upon conversion of debt
instruments.
Earnings (loss) per share was computed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | |
Basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
339,871 |
|
|
$ |
(352,378 |
) |
|
$ |
(83,453 |
) |
|
Shares used in computation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average ordinary shares outstanding
|
|
|
552,920 |
|
|
|
525,318 |
|
|
|
517,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
(0.67 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
339,871 |
|
|
$ |
(352,378 |
) |
|
$ |
(83,453 |
) |
|
Shares used in computation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average ordinary shares outstanding
|
|
|
552,920 |
|
|
|
525,318 |
|
|
|
517,198 |
|
|
|
Weighted average ordinary share equivalents from stock options
and awards(1)
|
|
|
12,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average ordinary share equivalents from convertible
notes(2)
|
|
|
19,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average ordinary shares and ordinary share equivalents
outstanding
|
|
|
585,499 |
|
|
|
525,318 |
|
|
|
517,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
(0.67 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Due to the Companys reported net loss, the ordinary share
equivalents from stock options and restricted stock to
purchase 13,668,419 and 8,730,635 shares outstanding
were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings (loss)
per share during fiscal years 2004 and 2003, respectively,
because the inclusion would be anti- dilutive for the periods. |
|
|
|
Also, the ordinary share equivalents from stock options to
purchase 24,186,135, 14,750,432 and 26,010,567 shares
outstanding during fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted
earnings (loss) per share because the exercise price of these
options was greater than the average market price of the
Companys ordinary shares during the respective periods. |
|
|
(2) |
Ordinary share equivalents from the zero coupon convertible
junior subordinated notes of 19,047,619 and 809,772 shares
outstanding were anti-dilutive in fiscal years 2004 and 2003,
respectively. Therefore, these are not assumed to be converted
for diluted earnings (loss) per share computation. Such shares
were included as common stock equivalents during fiscal year
2005. |
52
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
In addition, the ordinary share equivalents from the principal
portion of the 1% convertible subordinated notes due August
2010 are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings
(loss) per share, as the Company has the positive intent and
ability to settle the principal amount of the notes in cash. The
Company intends to settle any conversion spread (excess of
conversion value over face value) in stock. Accordingly, 575,587
ordinary shares equivalents from the conversion spread have been
included in the shares used for computation of diluted earnings
per share during fiscal 2005. The ordinary shares equivalent of
851,274 from the conversion spread were anti-dilutive in fiscal
year 2004, and therefore, these were excluded from the
computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share during fiscal
year 2004. No such shares were outstanding during fiscal year
2003. |
|
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB
No. 43, Chapter 4 (SFAS 151).
This statement amends the guidance of ARB. No 43, Chapter 4
Inventory Pricing and requires that abnormal amounts
of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted
material be recognized as current period charges. In addition,
this statement requires that allocation of fixed production
overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal
capacity of the production facilities. SFAS 151 is
effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not
anticipate that the implementation of this standard will have a
material impact on its financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.
|
|
|
Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings
Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of
2004 |
FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 109-2,
Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign
Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004 (FSP 109-2), provides
guidance under SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes, with respect to recording the potential
impact of the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004 (the Jobs Act) on income tax
expense and deferred tax liabilities. The Jobs Act was enacted
on October 22, 2004. FSP 109-2 states that an
enterprise is allowed time beyond the financial reporting period
of enactment to evaluate the effect of the Jobs Act on its plan
for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings for
purposes of applying SFAS No. 109. The Company is
currently assessing the impact of this provision and has not
determined whether to elect to apply it. Any effect on the
Companys tax accounts will be reflected in the quarter in
which a decision is made to apply the provision.
See Note 2, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation.
|
|
|
Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets |
On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued Statement
No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an
amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary
Transactions. SFAS No. 153 addresses the
measurement of exchanges of nonmonetary assets and redefines the
scope of transactions that should be measured based on the fair
value of the assets exchanged. SFAS No. 153 is
effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal
periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not
believe adoption of SFAS No. 153 will have a material
effect on its consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
53
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Implicit Variable Interests under FASB Interpretation
No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities |
In March 2005, the FASB issued FSP No. 46(R)-5,
Implicit Variable Interests under FASB Interpretation
No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities (FSP 46(R)-5), which
provides guidance for a reporting enterprise on whether it holds
an implicit variable interest in a variable interest entity
(VIE) or potential VIE when specific conditions exist. FSP
46(R)-5 is effective the first period beginning after
March 3, 2005. The Company is currently evaluating the
effect that the adoption of FSP 46(R)-5 will have on its
consolidated results of operations and financial condition but
does not expect it to have a material impact.
The Company has reclassified certain prior year information to
conform to the current years presentation.
|
|
3. |
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES |
The following table represents supplemental cash flow disclosure
and non-cash investing and financing activities during the
fiscal year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Net cash paid for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$ |
76,060 |
|
|
$ |
89,244 |
|
|
$ |
107,395 |
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$ |
24,246 |
|
|
$ |
36,356 |
|
|
$ |
11,348 |
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment acquired under capital lease obligations
|
|
$ |
6,091 |
|
|
$ |
18,713 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Issuance of ordinary shares for acquisition of businesses
|
|
$ |
127,226 |
|
|
$ |
3,162 |
|
|
$ |
14,712 |
|
|
|
4. |
BANK BORROWINGS AND LONG-TERM DEBT |
Bank borrowings and long-term debt was comprised of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Short term bank borrowings
|
|
$ |
10,304 |
|
|
$ |
89,335 |
|
0.00% convertible junior subordinated notes
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
9.875% senior subordinated notes, net of discount
|
|
|
7,659 |
|
|
|
7,659 |
|
9.75% Euro senior subordinated notes
|
|
|
7,432 |
|
|
|
181,422 |
|
1.00% convertible subordinated notes
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
6.50% senior subordinated notes
|
|
|
399,650 |
|
|
|
399,650 |
|
6.25% senior subordinated notes
|
|
|
490,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding under revolving lines of credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
Other
|
|
|
102,562 |
|
|
|
107,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,717,877 |
|
|
|
1,705,464 |
|
Current portion
|
|
|
(17,448 |
) |
|
|
(96,287 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current portion
|
|
$ |
1,700,429 |
|
|
$ |
1,609,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Maturities for the Companys bank borrowings and long-term
debt are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ending March 31, |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
2006
|
|
$ |
17,448 |
|
2007
|
|
|
28,417 |
|
2008
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,472,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,717,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Credit Facilities and Other Credit Lines |
The Company has a revolving credit facility, which as of
March 31, 2005, was in the amount of $1.1 billion, and
under which there were no borrowings outstanding as of
March 31, 2005. On May 27, 2005, the Company amended
the credit facility to increase the amount of the facility to
$1.35 billion and to make certain other changes. The
amended credit facility consists of two separate credit
agreements, one providing for up to $1.105 billion
principal amount of revolving credit loans to the Company and
its designated subsidiaries; and one providing for up to
$245.0 million principal amount of revolving credit loans
to a U.S. subsidiary of the Company. The amended credit
facility is a five-year facility expiring in May 2010.
Borrowings under the amended credit facility bear interest, at
the Companys option, either at (i) the base rate (the
greater of the agents prime rate or 0.50% plus the federal
funds rate) plus the applicable margin for base rate loans
ranging between 0.0% and 0.125%, based on the Companys
credit ratings; or (ii) the LIBOR rate plus the applicable
margin for LIBOR loans ranging between 0.625% and 1.125%, based
on the Companys credit ratings. The Company is required to
pay a quarterly commitment fee ranging from 0.125% to
0.250% per annum of the unutilized portion of the credit
facility and, if the utilized portion of the facility exceeds
33% of the total commitment, a quarterly utilization fee ranging
between 0.125% to 0.250% on such utilized portion, in each case
based on the Companys credit ratings. The Company is also
required to pay letter of credit usage fees ranging between
0.625% and 1.125% per annum (based on the Companys
credit ratings) on the amount of the daily average outstanding
letters of credit and issuance fees of 0.125% per annum on the
daily average undrawn amount of letter of credit.
The amended credit facility is unsecured, and contains certain
restrictions on the Companys and its subsidiaries
ability to (i) incur certain debt, (ii) make certain
investments, (iii) make certain acquisitions of other
entities, (iv) incur liens, (v) dispose of assets,
(vi) make non-cash distributions to shareholders, and
(vii) engage in transactions with affiliates. These
covenants are subject to a number of significant exceptions and
limitations. The amended credit facility also requires that the
Company maintain a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to EBITDA
(earnings before interest expense, taxes, depreciation and
amortization), and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, as
defined, during the term of the credit facility. Borrowings
under the credit facility are guaranteed by the Company and
certain of its subsidiaries.
Certain subsidiaries of the Company have various lines of credit
available with annual interest rates ranging from 3.97% to
15.0%. These lines of credit expire on various dates through
fiscal year 2006. The Company also has term loans with annual
interest rates ranging from 4.63% to 10.25%. These lines of
credit and term loans are primarily secured by assignment of
account receivables and assets.
55
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
9.75% Euro Senior Subordinated Notes |
In March 2005, the Company paid approximately
$190.1 million to redeem
144.2 million
of 9.75% euro senior subordinated notes due July 2010. In
connection with the redemption, the Company incurred a loss of
approximately $16.3 million in fiscal year 2005 associated
with the early extinguishment of the notes.
|
|
|
6.25% Senior Subordinated Notes |
In November 2004, the Company issued $500.0 million of
6.25% senior subordinated notes due in November 2014, for
net proceeds of $493.0 million, of which
$469.0 million was used to pay down the then outstanding
balance on the Companys existing revolving credit facility.
The Company may redeem the notes in whole or in part at
redemption prices of 103.125%, 102.083% and 101.042% of the
principal amount thereof if the redemption occurs during the
respective 12-month periods beginning on November 15 of the
years 2009, 2010 and 2011, and at a redemption price of 100% of
the principal amount thereof on and after November 15,
2012, in each case, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the
redemption date. In addition, if the Company generates net cash
proceeds from certain equity offerings on or before
November 15, 2007, the Company may redeem up to 35% in
aggregate principal amount of the Notes at a redemption price of
106.25% of the principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed,
plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date.
The indenture governing the Companys outstanding
6.25% senior subordinated notes contain certain covenants
that, among other things, limit the ability of the Company and
its restricted subsidiaries to (i) incur additional debt,
(ii) issue or sell stock of certain subsidiaries,
(iii) engage in certain asset sales, (iv) make
distributions or pay dividends, (v) purchase or redeem
capital stock, or (vi) engage in transactions with
affiliates. The covenants are subject to a number of significant
exceptions and limitations.
|
|
|
1.0% Convertible Subordinated Notes |
In August 2003, the Company issued $500.0 million aggregate
principal amount of 1.0% convertible subordinated notes due
August 2010. The notes are convertible at any time prior to
maturity into ordinary shares of the Company at a conversion
price of $15.525 (subject to certain adjustments). The Company
used a portion of the net proceeds from this issuance and other
cash sources to repurchase $492.3 million of its
9.875% senior subordinated notes due July 2010. In
connection with the repurchase, the Company incurred a loss of
approximately $95.2 million during second quarter of fiscal
year 2004 associated with the early extinguishment of the notes.
|
|
|
6.5% Senior Subordinated Notes |
In May 2003, the Company issued $400.0 million of
6.5% senior subordinated notes due May 2013. In June 2003,
the Company used $156.6 million of the net proceeds from
the issuance to redeem all of its outstanding 8.75% senior
subordinated notes due October 2007, of which
$150.0 million aggregate principal was outstanding. In
connection with the redemption, the Company incurred a loss of
approximately $8.7 million during first quarter of fiscal
year 2004 associated with the early extinguishment of the notes.
The Company may redeem the notes in whole or in part at
redemption prices of 103.250%, 102.167% and 101.083% of the
principal amount thereof if the redemption occurs during the
respective 12-month periods beginning on May 15 of the years
2008, 2009 and 2010, and at a redemption price of 100% of the
principal amount thereof on and after 2011, in each case, plus
any accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. In
addition, if the Company generates net cash proceeds from
certain equity offerings on or before May 15, 2006, the
Company may redeem up to 35% in aggregate principal amount of
the Notes at a redemption price of 106.5% of the principal
amount of the Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid
interest to the redemption date.
56
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The indenture governing the Companys outstanding
6.5% senior subordinated notes contain certain covenants
that, among other things, limit the ability of the Company and
its restricted subsidiaries to (i) incur additional debt,
(ii) issue or sell stock of certain subsidiaries,
(iii) engage in certain asset sales, (iv) make
distributions or pay dividends, (v) purchase or redeem
capital stock, or (vi) engage transactions with affiliates.
The covenants are subject to a number of significant exceptions
and limitations.
|
|
|
Zero Coupon Convertible Junior Subordinated Notes |
In March 2003, the Company issued $200.0 million, zero
coupon, zero yield, convertible junior subordinated notes
maturing in March 2008. The notes are callable by the Company
after three years and do not provide a put option prior to
maturity. The notes are convertible into ordinary shares at a
conversion price of $10.50 per share and are payable in
cash or stock at maturity, at the Companys option.
As of March 31, 2005, the approximate fair values of the
Companys 9.875% notes, 9.75% notes,
6.5% notes, 6.25% notes and 1% convertible notes
based on broker trading prices were 98.625%, 106.5%, 99.25%,
95.0% and 99.0% of the face values of the notes, respectively.
The value of the Companys cash and cash equivalents,
investments, accounts receivable and accounts payable carrying
amount approximates fair value. The fair value of the
Companys long-term debt is determined based on current
broker trading prices. The Companys cash equivalents are
comprised of cash deposited in money market accounts and
certificates of deposit (see Note 2, Summary of
Accounting Policies). The Companys investment policy
limits the amount of credit exposure to 20% of the total
investment portfolio in any single issuer.
The Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk
inherent in forecasted sales, cost of sales, and assets and
liabilities denominated in non-functional currencies. The
Company has established currency risk management programs to
protect against reductions in value and volatility of future
cash flows caused by changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
The Company enters into short-term foreign currency forward
contracts to hedge only those currency exposures associated with
certain assets and liabilities, mainly accounts receivable and
accounts payable, and cash flows denominated in non-functional
currencies. The Company does not engage in foreign currency
speculation. The credit risk of these forward contracts is
minimized since the contracts are with large financial
institutions. The Company hedges committed exposures and these
forward contracts generally do not subject the Company to risk
of accounting losses. The gains and losses on forward contracts
generally offset the gains and losses on the assets, liabilities
and transactions hedged.
The aggregate notional amount of outstanding contracts was
$2.4 billion and $1.5 billion as of March 31,
2005 and 2004, respectively. The majority of these foreign
exchange contracts expire in less than one month and almost all
expire within six months. As of March 31, 2005 and 2004,
the fair value of these short-term foreign currency forward
contracts was recorded as other current assets amounting to
$13.4 million and $8.9 million respectively. As of
March 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company had recorded in other
comprehensive income (loss) deferred losses of $6.3 million
and deferred gains of $4.3 million, respectively, relating
to the Companys foreign currency forward contracts. These
amounts are expected to be recognized in earnings over the next
twelve months. The gains and losses recognized in earnings due
to hedge ineffectiveness were immaterial for all periods
presented.
On November 17, 2004, the Company issued
$500.0 million of 6.25% senior subordinated notes due
in November 2014. Interest is payable semiannually on May 15 and
November 15. The Company entered into interest rate swap
transactions to effectively convert a portion of the fixed
interest rate debt to a variable rate debt. The swaps, which
expire in 2014, are accounted for as fair value hedges under
SFAS 133. The notional amounts of the swaps total
$400.0 million. Under the terms of the swaps, the Company
will pay an interest
57
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
rate equal to the six-month LIBOR rate, set in arrears, plus a
fixed spread of 1.37% to 1.52%. In exchange, the Company will
receive a payment based on a fixed rate of 6.25%. At
March 31, 2005, $9.7 million has been recorded in
other current assets to record the fair value of the interest
rate swaps, with a corresponding decrease to the carrying value
of the 6.25% senior subordinated notes on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet.
|
|
6. |
TRADE RECEIVABLES SECURIZATION |
The Company continuously sells a designated pool of trade
receivables to a third party qualified special purpose entity,
which in turn sells an undivided ownership interest to a
conduit, administered by an unaffiliated financial institution.
In addition to this financial institution, the Company
participates in the securitization agreement as an investor in
the conduit. The Company continues to service, administer and
collect the receivables on behalf of the special purpose entity
and receives a servicing fee of 1.0% of serviced receivables per
annum. The Company pays annual facility and commitment fees of
up to 0.24% for unused amounts and program fees of up to 0.34%
of outstanding amounts. The securitization agreement allows the
operating subsidiaries participating in the securitization to
receive a cash payment for sold receivables, less a deferred
purchase price receivable. The Companys share of the total
investment varies depending on certain criteria, mainly the
collection performance on the sold receivables. The agreement,
which expires in March 2006, is subject to annual renewal.
At March 31, 2005, the unaffiliated financial
institutions maximum investment limit was
$250 million. The Company has sold $249.9 million and
$328.0 million of its accounts receivable as of
March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, which represent the
face amount of the total outstanding trade receivables on all
designated customer accounts on those dates. The Company
received net cash proceeds of $134.7 million and
$172.1 million from the unaffiliated financial institutions
for the sale of these receivables during fiscal years 2005 and
2004, respectively. The Company has a recourse obligation that
is limited to the deferred purchase price receivable, which
approximates 5% of the total sold receivables, and its own
investment participation, the total of which was
$123.1 million and $161.6 million as of March 31,
2005 and 2004, respectively.
Additionally, during fiscal year 2005, the Company sold
approximately $426.0 million of receivables to a banking
institution with limited recourse, which management believes is
nominal. The outstanding balance of sold receivables, not yet
collected, was $202.1 million as of March 31, 2005.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 140 (SFAS 140) Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liability, the accounts receivable balances that were sold
were removed from the consolidated balance sheet and are
reflected as cash provided by operating activities in the
consolidated statement of cash flows.
58
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
7. |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
As of March 31, 2005 and 2004, the gross carrying amount of
the Companys property and equipment financed under capital
leases amounted to approximately $41.8 million and
$38.3 million, respectively. Accumulated depreciation for
property and equipment under capital leases totaled
$23.9 million and $14.7 million at March 31, 2005
and 2004, respectively. These capital leases have interest rates
ranging from 2.5% to 12.7%. The Company also leases certain of
its facilities under non-cancelable operating leases. The
capital and operating leases expire in various years through
2059 and require the following minimum lease payments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital | |
|
Operating | |
Fiscal Year Ending March 31, |
|
Lease | |
|
Lease | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
2006
|
|
$ |
9,202 |
|
|
$ |
77,497 |
|
2007
|
|
|
5,764 |
|
|
|
54,496 |
|
2008
|
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
36,505 |
|
2009
|
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
24,969 |
|
2010
|
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
19,549 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,207 |
|
|
|
202,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
|
18,879 |
|
|
$ |
415,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount representing interest
|
|
|
(1,020 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of total minimum lease payments
|
|
|
17,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
(8,718 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligation, net of current portion
|
|
$ |
9,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total rent expense amounted to $92.3 million,
$94.1 million, and $116.3 million in fiscal years
2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Included in the above remaining operating lease payments
commitments are payments under two leases located in Mexico and
Texas. Refer to Note 15, Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities for further discussion.
On June 29, 2004, the Company entered into an asset
purchase agreement with Nortel providing for Flextronicss
purchase of certain of Nortels optical, wireless, wireline
and enterprise manufacturing operations and optical design
operations. The purchase of these assets will occur in stages,
with the first and second stages completed in November 2004 and
February 2005, and further stages scheduled in multiple phases
during fiscal year 2006. Refer to Note 13, Business
Acquisitions for further discussion.
The Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims, and
litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. The
Company defends itself vigorously against any such claims.
Although the outcome of these matters is currently not
determinable, management does not expect that the ultimate costs
to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on
its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or
cash flows.
59
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The domestic (Singapore) and foreign components of
income (loss) before income taxes were comprised of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Domestic
|
|
$ |
42,374 |
|
|
$ |
19,251 |
|
|
$ |
33,628 |
|
Foreign
|
|
|
234,535 |
|
|
|
(439,370 |
) |
|
|
(180,867 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
276,909 |
|
|
$ |
(420,119 |
) |
|
$ |
(147,239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The benefit from income taxes consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$ |
2,088 |
|
|
$ |
3,388 |
|
|
$ |
4,095 |
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
28,516 |
|
|
|
91,282 |
|
|
|
18,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,604 |
|
|
|
94,670 |
|
|
|
22,456 |
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
(599 |
) |
|
|
700 |
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(94,436 |
) |
|
|
(161,812 |
) |
|
|
(86,942 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93,566 |
) |
|
|
(162,411 |
) |
|
|
(86,242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit from income taxes
|
|
$ |
(62,962 |
) |
|
$ |
(67,741 |
) |
|
$ |
(63,786 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The domestic statutory income tax rate was approximately 20.0%
in fiscal years 2005 and 2004 and 22.0% in fiscal year 2003. The
reconciliation of the income tax benefit expected based on
domestic statutory income tax rates to the benefit for income
taxes included in the consolidated statements of operations is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Income tax based on domestic statutory rates
|
|
$ |
55,382 |
|
|
$ |
(84,024 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,392 |
) |
Effect of tax rate differential
|
|
|
(318,256 |
) |
|
|
(114,143 |
) |
|
|
(128,969 |
) |
Goodwill and other intangibles amortization
|
|
|
4,252 |
|
|
|
3,672 |
|
|
|
4,872 |
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
202,463 |
|
|
|
142,556 |
|
|
|
117,894 |
|
Other
|
|
|
(6,803 |
) |
|
|
(15,802 |
) |
|
|
(25,191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit from income taxes
|
|
$ |
(62,962 |
) |
|
$ |
(67,741 |
) |
|
$ |
(63,786 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of deferred income taxes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets
|
|
$ |
(37,669 |
) |
|
$ |
(39,373 |
) |
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(26,633 |
) |
|
|
(27,540 |
) |
|
Others
|
|
|
(3,874 |
) |
|
|
(1,684 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(68,176 |
) |
|
|
(68,597 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
4,710 |
|
|
|
8,229 |
|
|
Provision for inventory obsolescence
|
|
|
14,466 |
|
|
|
15,138 |
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
1,303 |
|
|
|
3,674 |
|
|
Net operating loss and other carryforwards
|
|
|
1,564,628 |
|
|
|
1,169,906 |
|
|
Others
|
|
|
68,730 |
|
|
|
64,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,653,837 |
|
|
|
1,261,193 |
|
Valuation allowances
|
|
|
(888,592 |
) |
|
|
(573,567 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax asset
|
|
|
765,245 |
|
|
|
687,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$ |
697,069 |
|
|
$ |
619,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification of net deferred tax asset:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$ |
12,117 |
|
|
$ |
14,244 |
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
684,952 |
|
|
|
604,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
697,069 |
|
|
$ |
619,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has total tax loss carryforwards of approximately
$3.9 billion, a portion of which begin expiring in 2010.
Utilization of the tax loss carryforwards and other deferred tax
assets is limited by the future earnings of the Company in the
tax jurisdictions in which such deferred assets arose. As a
result, management is uncertain as to when or whether these
operations will generate sufficient profit to realize any
benefit from the deferred tax assets. The valuation allowance
provides a reserve against deferred tax assets that may not be
realized by the Company. However, management has determined that
it is more likely than not that the Company will realize certain
of these benefits and, accordingly, has recognized a deferred
tax asset from these benefits. The change in valuation allowance
is net of certain increases and decreases to prior year losses
and other carryforwards that have no current impact on the tax
provision. Approximately $32.5 million of the valuation
allowance relates to income tax benefits arising from the
exercise of stock options, which will be credited directly to
shareholders equity and will not be available to benefit
the income tax provision in any future period.
The amount of deferred tax assets considered realizable,
however, could be reduced or increased in the near-term if
facts, including the amount of taxable income or the mix of
taxable income between subsidiaries, differ from
managements estimates.
The Company does not provide for federal income taxes on the
undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries, as such
earnings are not intended by management to be repatriated in the
foreseeable future. Determination of the amount of the
unrecognized deferred tax liability on these undistributed
earnings is not practicable.
61
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On July 27, 2004, the Company completed a public offering
of 24,330,900 of its ordinary shares for which the Company
received net proceeds of approximately $299.5 million.
|
|
|
Stock Option and Incentive Plans |
At March 31, 2005, the Company had four stock-based
employee compensation plans: the 2004 Award Plan for New
Employees (the 2004 Plan), the 2002 Interim
Incentive Plan (the 2002 Plan), the 2001 Equity
Incentive Plan (the 2001 Plan) and the 1997 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan.
The 2001 Plan provides for grants of up to
7,000,000 shares. Additionally, upon adoption of the 2001
Plan, the remaining shares that were available under the
Companys 1993 Share Option Plan (the 1993
Plan), the 1999 Interim Option Plan, the 1998 Interim
Option Plan, the 1997 Interim Option Plan, and all assumed plans
and any shares issuable upon exercise of the options granted
under those plans that expire or become unexercisable for any
reason without having been exercised in full, are available for
grant under the 2001 Plan. The adoption of the 2001 Plan
mandated that no additional options be granted under the 1993
Plan, the 1999 Interim Option Plan, the 1998 Interim Option
Plan, the 1997 Interim Option Plan, or the assumed plans. Any
options outstanding under these plans will remain outstanding
until exercised or until they terminate or expire by their
terms. The 2001 Plan contains two separate equity incentive
programs including a discretionary option grant program and an
automatic option grant program. The discretionary option grant
program is administered by the Compensation Committee with
respect to officers and directors, and by the Chief Executive
Officer with respect to all other employees.
Options granted under the 2001 Plan, the 1993 Plan, the 1999
Interim Option Plan, the 1998 Interim Option Plan, and the 1997
Interim Option Plan generally vest over four years. Options
granted under the assumed plans have varying vesting schedules.
Options granted under the 2001 Plan generally expire
ten years from the date of grant. Pursuant to an amendment
to the provisions relating to the term of options provided under
the 1993 Plan, options granted subsequent to October 1,
2000 expire ten years from the date of grant, rather than the
five-year term previously provided. Options granted under the
1999 Interim Option Plan expire five years from the date of
grant. Options granted prior to July 2002 under the 1998 and
1997 Interim Option Plans expire five years from the date of
grant and all subsequent option grants generally expire ten
years from the date of grant.
The 2002 Plan provides for grants of up to
20,000,000 shares. The plan provides grants of nonqualified
stock options to employees, officers and directors. The exercise
price of options granted under the 2002 Plan is determined by
the Companys Compensation Committee and may not be less
than the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date
of grant. Options issued under the 2002 Plan generally vest over
four years and generally expire ten years from the date of grant.
The 2004 Plan provides for grants of up to
7,500,000 shares. The plan provides grants of nonqualified
stock options to new employees. The exercise price of options
granted under the 2004 Plan is determined by the Companys
Compensation Committee and may not be less than the fair market
value of the underlying stock on the date of grant. Options
issued under the 2004 Plan generally vest over four years and
generally expire ten years from the date of grant.
The Companys 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the
Purchase Plan) provides for issuance of up to
3,400,000 ordinary shares. The Purchase Plan was approved by the
shareholders in October 1997. Under the Purchase Plan, employees
may purchase, on a periodic basis, a limited number of ordinary
shares through payroll deductions over a six-month period up to
10% of each participants compensation. The per share
purchase price is 85% of the fair market value of the stock at
the beginning or end of the offering period,
62
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
whichever is lower. The ordinary shares sold under this plan in
fiscal year 2005, fiscal year 2004 and fiscal year 2003 amounted
to 560,596, 717,595, and 1,009,692, respectively. The
weighted-average fair value of ordinary shares sold under this
plan in fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $14.31, $10.30 and
$11.52 per share, respectively.
The following table presents the activity for options
outstanding under all of the stock option plans
(Price reflects the weighted average exercise price):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
March 31, 2004 | |
|
March 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Options | |
|
Price | |
|
Options | |
|
Price | |
|
Options | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding, beginning of fiscal year
|
|
|
50,303,999 |
|
|
$ |
12.86 |
|
|
|
55,682,533 |
|
|
$ |
11.35 |
|
|
|
45,641,139 |
|
|
$ |
15.00 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
18,461,056 |
|
|
|
13.94 |
|
|
|
8,841,856 |
|
|
|
15.60 |
|
|
|
19,864,076 |
|
|
|
6.97 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(3,182,087 |
) |
|
|
9.34 |
|
|
|
(8,235,283 |
) |
|
|
6.66 |
|
|
|
(4,567,256 |
) |
|
|
4.05 |
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(8,004,567 |
) |
|
|
17.99 |
|
|
|
(5,985,107 |
) |
|
|
11.39 |
|
|
|
(5,255,426 |
) |
|
|
21.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of fiscal year
|
|
|
57,578,401 |
|
|
$ |
12.67 |
|
|
|
50,303,999 |
|
|
$ |
12.86 |
|
|
|
55,682,533 |
|
|
$ |
11.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable, end of fiscal year
|
|
|
40,484,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,638,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,056,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value per option granted
|
|
$ |
7.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the composition of options
outstanding and exercisable as of March 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
Options Exercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Contractual | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Number of | |
|
Exercise | |
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Shares | |
|
Life | |
|
Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$ 0.42 - $ 5.88
|
|
|
7,053,025 |
|
|
|
4.28 |
|
|
$ |
4.63 |
|
|
|
5,998,121 |
|
|
$ |
4.41 |
|
$ 5.96 - $ 6.23
|
|
|
644,644 |
|
|
|
3.75 |
|
|
|
6.17 |
|
|
|
641,311 |
|
|
|
6.17 |
|
$ 7.13 - $ 7.90
|
|
|
11,754,976 |
|
|
|
6.84 |
|
|
|
7.88 |
|
|
|
5,265,193 |
|
|
|
7.86 |
|
$ 8.01 - $11.53
|
|
|
5,836,848 |
|
|
|
7.64 |
|
|
|
10.20 |
|
|
|
2,245,515 |
|
|
|
8.88 |
|
$11.57 - $13.18
|
|
|
7,574,965 |
|
|
|
9.47 |
|
|
|
12.68 |
|
|
|
3,120,440 |
|
|
|
13.14 |
|
$13.35 - $15.90
|
|
|
8,219,876 |
|
|
|
7.19 |
|
|
|
14.70 |
|
|
|
6,721,552 |
|
|
|
14.99 |
|
$15.95 - $17.37
|
|
|
6,948,010 |
|
|
|
8.48 |
|
|
|
16.93 |
|
|
|
6,946,960 |
|
|
|
16.93 |
|
$17.38 - $23.19
|
|
|
7,474,801 |
|
|
|
6.90 |
|
|
|
19.71 |
|
|
|
7,473,726 |
|
|
|
19.71 |
|
$23.61 - $43.00
|
|
|
2,068,956 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
28.43 |
|
|
|
2,068,956 |
|
|
|
28.43 |
|
$44.13 - $44.13
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
44.13 |
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
44.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 0.42 - $44.13
|
|
|
57,578,401 |
|
|
|
6.94 |
|
|
$ |
12.67 |
|
|
|
40,484,074 |
|
|
$ |
13.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. |
RESTRUCTURING CHARGES |
In recent years, the Company has initiated a series of
restructuring activities in light of the global economic
downturn. These activities, which are intended to realign the
Companys global capacity and infrastructure with demand by
its OEM customers and thereby improve operational efficiency,
include reducing excess workforce and capacity, and
consolidating and relocating certain manufacturing and
administrative facilities to lower cost regions.
63
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The restructuring costs include employee severance, costs
related to leased facilities, owned facilities that are no
longer in use and are to be disposed of, leased equipment that
is no longer in use and will be disposed of, and other costs
associated with the exit of certain contractual agreements due
to facility closures. The overall impact of these activities is
that the Company has shifted its manufacturing capacity to
locations with higher efficiencies and, in some instances, lower
costs, and is better utilizing its overall existing
manufacturing capacity. This has enhanced the Companys
ability to provide cost-effective manufacturing service
offerings, which enables it to retain and expand the
Companys existing relationships with customers and attract
new business. These restructuring activities were substantially
complete as of March 31, 2004, with some smaller-scale
activities occurring in fiscal year 2005. The facility closures
and activities related to the restructuring charges were
substantially completed within one year of the commitment dates
of the respective exit plans, except for certain long-term
contractual obligations.
The Company accounts for costs associated with restructuring
activities initiated after December 31, 2002 in accordance
with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, which
supersedes previous accounting guidance, principally Emerging
Issues Task Force Issue (EITF) No. 94-3,
Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination
Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activities.
SFAS 146 requires that the liability for costs associated
with exit or disposal of activities be recognized when the
liability is incurred.
Fiscal Year 2005
The Company recognized restructuring charges of approximately
$95.4 million during fiscal year 2005 related to severance,
the impairment of certain long-term assets and other costs
resulting from closures and consolidations of various
manufacturing facilities. The Company has classified
$78.4 million of the charges associated with facility
closures as a component of cost of sales during fiscal year
2005. The Company currently anticipates that the facility
closures and activities to which all of these charges relate
will be substantially completed within one year of the
commitment dates of the respective activities, except for
certain long-term contractual obligations. During fiscal year
2005, the Company recorded approximately $16.3 million of
other exit costs primarily associated with contractual
obligations. As of March 31, 2005, approximately
$1.9 million is classified as long-term obligations and
will be paid throughout the term of the terminated leases.
As of March 31, 2005, assets that were no longer in use and
held for sale totaled approximately $59.3 million,
primarily representing manufacturing facilities located in the
Americas that have been closed as part of the facility
consolidations. For assets held for sale, depreciation ceases
and an impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of
the asset exceeds its fair value less cost to sell. Assets held
for sale are included in other assets on the consolidated
balance sheet.
64
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of the restructuring charges during the first,
second, third, and fourth quarters of fiscal year 2005 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First | |
|
Second | |
|
Third | |
|
Fourth | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Total | |
|
Nature | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
|
|
Americas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
$ |
1,793 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived asset impairment
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
|
5,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other exit costs
|
|
|
1,598 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring charges
|
|
|
3,756 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
|
9,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other exit costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
17,447 |
|
|
|
15,613 |
|
|
|
29,092 |
|
|
|
1,515 |
|
|
|
63,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived asset impairment
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
5,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
6,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other exit costs
|
|
|
2,285 |
|
|
|
9,341 |
|
|
|
1,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring charges
|
|
|
19,832 |
|
|
|
30,697 |
|
|
|
30,489 |
|
|
|
2,310 |
|
|
|
83,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
19,240 |
|
|
|
16,485 |
|
|
|
29,092 |
|
|
|
1,515 |
|
|
|
66,332 |
|
|
|
Cash |
|
Long-lived asset impairment
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
6,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,095 |
|
|
|
12,695 |
|
|
|
Non-cash |
|
Other exit costs
|
|
|
3,883 |
|
|
|
10,882 |
|
|
|
1,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,332 |
|
|
|
Cash & non-cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring charges
|
|
$ |
23,588 |
|
|
$ |
33,502 |
|
|
$ |
30,659 |
|
|
$ |
7,610 |
|
|
$ |
95,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal year 2005 the Company recorded approximately
$66.3 million of employee termination costs associated with
the involuntary terminations of approximately 3,000 identified
employees in connection with the various facility closures and
consolidations. The identified involuntary employee terminations
by reportable geographic region amounted to approximately 300
for the Americas, 200 for Asia and 2,500 for Europe,
respectively. As of March 31, 2005, approximately 2,950
employees have been terminated under these plans, while
approximately 50 employees have been notified but not yet
terminated. Approximately $54.7 million of the charges were
classified as a component of cost of sales.
During fiscal year 2005 the Company also recorded approximately
$12.7 million for the write-down of property and equipment
and other assets associated with various manufacturing and
administrative facility closures. Approximately
$11.2 million of this amount was classified as a component
of cost of sales.
The restructuring charges recorded during fiscal year 2005 also
included approximately $16.3 million for other exit costs.
Approximately $12.5 million of the amount was classified as
a component of cost of sales. Of this amount, customer
disengagement costs amounted to approximately $5.5 million;
facility lease obligations accounted for approximately
$2.3 million and facility abandonment and refurbishment
costs accounted for approximately $3.7 million.
65
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes the provisions, payments and the
accrual balance relating to restructuring costs incurred during
fiscal year ended March 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
Severance | |
|
Impairment | |
|
Exit Costs | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Activities during the year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
|
|
$ |
66,332 |
|
|
$ |
12,695 |
|
|
$ |
16,332 |
|
|
$ |
95,359 |
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(57,758 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,977 |
) |
|
|
(64,735 |
) |
|
Non-cash charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,695 |
) |
|
|
(6,624 |
) |
|
|
(19,319 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2005
|
|
|
8,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,731 |
|
|
|
11,305 |
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion (classified as other current liabilities)
|
|
|
(8,574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(799 |
) |
|
|
(9,373 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued facility closure costs, net of current portion
(classified as other long-term liabilities)
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,932 |
|
|
$ |
1,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recognized restructuring charges of approximately
$540.3 million during fiscal year 2004 related to the
impairment of certain long-term assets and other costs resulting
from closures and consolidations of various manufacturing
facilities. The Company has classified $477.3 million of
the charges associated with facility closures as a component of
cost of sales during fiscal year 2004.
66
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company anticipates that the facility closures and
activities to which all of these charges relate will be
substantially completed within one year of the commitment dates
of the respective exit plans, except for certain long-term
contractual obligations. The components of the restructuring
charges during the quarters of fiscal year 2004 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First | |
|
Second | |
|
Third | |
|
Fourth | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Total | |
|
Nature | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
|
|
Americas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
$ |
3,691 |
|
|
$ |
14,072 |
|
|
$ |
5,023 |
|
|
$ |
3,623 |
|
|
$ |
26,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived asset impairment
|
|
|
64,844 |
|
|
|
18,024 |
|
|
|
2,273 |
|
|
|
8,247 |
|
|
|
93,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other exit costs
|
|
|
17,736 |
|
|
|
18,492 |
|
|
|
18,978 |
|
|
|
25,772 |
|
|
|
80,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring charges
|
|
|
86,271 |
|
|
|
50,588 |
|
|
|
26,274 |
|
|
|
37,642 |
|
|
|
200,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived asset impairment
|
|
|
111,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other exit costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring charges
|
|
|
111,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
8,200 |
|
|
|
6,003 |
|
|
|
28,081 |
|
|
|
35,040 |
|
|
|
77,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived asset impairment
|
|
|
114,388 |
|
|
|
1,497 |
|
|
|
8,008 |
|
|
|
2,539 |
|
|
|
126,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other exit costs
|
|
|
6,909 |
|
|
|
2,164 |
|
|
|
8,656 |
|
|
|
6,748 |
|
|
|
24,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring charges
|
|
|
129,497 |
|
|
|
9,664 |
|
|
|
44,745 |
|
|
|
44,327 |
|
|
|
228,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
11,891 |
|
|
|
20,075 |
|
|
|
33,104 |
|
|
|
38,663 |
|
|
|
103,733 |
|
|
|
Cash |
|
Long-lived asset impairment
|
|
|
290,572 |
|
|
|
19,521 |
|
|
|
10,281 |
|
|
|
10,786 |
|
|
|
331,160 |
|
|
|
Non-cash |
|
Other exit costs
|
|
|
24,645 |
|
|
|
20,656 |
|
|
|
27,634 |
|
|
|
32,520 |
|
|
|
105,455 |
|
|
|
Cash & non-cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring charges
|
|
$ |
327,108 |
|
|
$ |
60,252 |
|
|
$ |
71,019 |
|
|
$ |
81,969 |
|
|
$ |
540,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal year 2004, the Company recorded approximately
$103.7 million of employee termination costs associated
with the involuntary terminations of approximately 5,200
identified employees in connection with the various facility
closures and consolidations. The identified involuntary employee
terminations by reportable geographic region amounted to
approximately 2,100 and 3,100 for the Americas and Europe,
respectively. As of March 31, 2005, the total employees
terminated under these plans had reached approximately 5,110,
while approximately 90 employees have been notified but not yet
terminated. Approximately $84.6 million of the net charges
were classified as a component of cost of sales during fiscal
year 2004.
During fiscal year 2004 the Company also recorded approximately
$331.2 million for the write-down of property and equipment
associated with various manufacturing and administrative
facility closures. Approximately $317.4 million of this
amount was classified as a component of cost of sales in fiscal
year 2004. Certain assets will remain in service until their
anticipated disposal dates pursuant to the exit plans. For
assets being held for use, impairment is measured as the amount
by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
asset. This calculation is measured at the asset group level,
which is the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash
flows. The fair value of assets held for use was determined
based on projected discounted cash flows of the asset, plus
salvage value. Certain other assets are held for sale, as these
assets are no longer required in operations. For assets held for
sale, depreciation ceases and an impairment loss is recognized
if the
67
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value less cost to
sell. Assets held for sale are included in other assets on the
consolidated balance sheet.
The restructuring charges recorded during fiscal year 2004 also
included approximately $105.5 million for other exit costs.
Approximately $75.3 million of this amount was classified
as a component of cost of sales in fiscal year 2004. Other exit
costs included contractual obligations totaling
$59.1 million, which were incurred directly as a result of
the various exit plans. The contractual obligations consisted of
facility lease terminations amounting to $46.2 million,
equipment lease terminations amounting to $7.3 million and
payments to suppliers and third parties to terminate contractual
agreements amounting to $5.6 million. Expenses associated
with lease obligations are estimated based on future lease
payment, less any estimated sublease income. The Company expects
to make payments associated with its contractual obligations
with respect to facility and equipment leases through the end of
fiscal year 2024. Other exit costs also included charges of
$17.7 million relating to asset impairments resulting from
customer contracts that were terminated by the Company as a
result of various facility closures. The Company had disposed of
the impaired assets, primarily through scrapping and write-offs,
by the end of fiscal year 2004. Other exit costs also included
$4.1 million of net facility refurbishment and abandonment
costs related to certain building repair work necessary to
prepare the exited facilities for sale or to return the
facilities to their respective landlords. The remaining
$24.6 million primarily related to legal and consulting
costs, and various government obligations for which the Company
is liable as a direct result of its facility closures. The legal
costs mainly relate to a settlement reached in November 2003 in
the lawsuit with Beckman Coulter, Inc., relating to a contract
dispute involving a manufacturing relationship between the
companies. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement,
Flextronics agreed to a $23.0 million cash payment to
Beckman Coulter to resolve the matter, and Beckman Coulter
agreed to dismiss all pending claims against the Company and
release the Company from any future claims relating to this
matter.
The following table summarizes the provisions, payments and the
accrual balance relating to restructuring costs initiated prior
to fiscal year ended March 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Exit | |
|
|
|
|
Severance | |
|
Costs | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Balance as of March 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
22,376 |
|
|
$ |
38,731 |
|
|
$ |
61,107 |
|
Activities during fiscal year 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(18,653 |
) |
|
|
(23,914 |
) |
|
|
(42,567 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2005
|
|
|
3,723 |
|
|
|
14,817 |
|
|
|
18,540 |
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion (classified as other current liabilities)
|
|
|
(3,723 |
) |
|
|
(8,639 |
) |
|
|
(12,362 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued facility closure costs, net of current portion
(classified as other long-term liabilities)
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,178 |
|
|
$ |
6,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company accounted for costs associated with restructuring
activities initiated prior to December 31, 2002 in
accordance with EITF No. 94-3.
The Company recognized restructuring and other charges of
approximately $304.4 million during fiscal year 2003, of
which $297.0 million related to the closures and
consolidations of various manufacturing facilities and
$7.4 million related to the impairment of investments in
certain technology companies. As further discussed below,
$179.4 million and $86.9 million of the charges
relating to facility closures were classified as a component of
cost of sales in the first and third quarters of fiscal year
2003, respectively.
68
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of the net restructuring and other charges
recorded during the first and third quarters of fiscal year 2003
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First | |
|
Third | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Total | |
|
Nature | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
|
|
Americas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
$ |
21,053 |
|
|
$ |
11,654 |
|
|
$ |
32,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived asset impairment
|
|
|
31,061 |
|
|
|
30,017 |
|
|
|
61,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other exit costs
|
|
|
42,287 |
|
|
|
31,086 |
|
|
|
73,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring charges
|
|
|
94,401 |
|
|
|
72,757 |
|
|
|
167,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
2,306 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
2,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived asset impairment
|
|
|
5,072 |
|
|
|
(5,397 |
) |
|
|
(325 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other exit costs
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
(1,677 |
) |
|
|
(328 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring charges
|
|
|
8,727 |
|
|
|
(6,891 |
) |
|
|
1,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
53,542 |
|
|
|
29,737 |
|
|
|
83,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived asset impairment
|
|
|
20,146 |
|
|
|
(10,335 |
) |
|
|
9,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other exit costs
|
|
|
23,551 |
|
|
|
11,320 |
|
|
|
34,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring charges
|
|
|
97,239 |
|
|
|
30,722 |
|
|
|
127,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
76,901 |
|
|
|
41,574 |
|
|
|
118,475 |
|
|
|
Cash |
|
Long-lived asset impairment
|
|
|
56,279 |
|
|
|
14,285 |
|
|
|
70,564 |
|
|
|
Non-cash |
|
Other exit costs
|
|
|
67,187 |
|
|
|
40,729 |
|
|
|
107,916 |
|
|
|
Cash & non-cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring charges
|
|
$ |
200,367 |
|
|
$ |
96,588 |
|
|
$ |
296,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the facility closures, the Company developed
plans to exit certain activities and involuntarily terminate
employees. Managements plan to exit an activity included
the identification of duplicate manufacturing and administrative
facilities for closure or consolidation into other facilities.
During fiscal year 2003, the Company recorded approximately
$118.5 million of net employee termination costs associated
with the involuntary terminations of approximately 8,100
identified employees in connection with the various facility
closures and consolidations. The identified involuntary employee
terminations by reportable geographic region are as follows:
2,900 for the Americas, 4,900 for Asia and 300 for Europe. As of
March 31, 2005, all identified employees have been
terminated. Approximately $59.6 million and
$34.6 million of the net charges were classified as a
component of cost of sales in the first and third quarters of
fiscal year 2003, respectively. The third quarter charges
reflect a reversal of prior period termination costs of
approximately $5.8 million due to changes in estimated
severance payment amounts and a reduction in the number
employees that were previously identified for termination.
The restructuring charges recorded during fiscal year 2003
included $70.6 million for the net write-down of property,
plant and equipment associated with various manufacturing and
administrative facility closures from their carrying value of
$121.4 million. Approximately $55.3 million and
$9.5 million of this net amount were classified as a
component of cost of sales in the first and third quarters of
fiscal year 2003, respectively. Also included in long-lived
asset impairment is approximately $1.0 million for the
write-off of goodwill. The
69
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
third quarter charges reflect a reversal of prior period
restructuring charges of approximately $26.1 million due to
changes in previously estimated fair values of certain property,
plant and equipment. Certain assets were held for use and
remained in service until their anticipated disposal dates
pursuant to the exit plans. For assets being held for use,
impairment is measured as the amount by which the carrying
amount exceeds the fair value of the asset. The fair value of
assets held for use was determined based on projected discounted
cash flows of the asset, plus salvage value. Certain other
assets were held for sale, as these assets were no longer
required in operations. For assets being held for sale,
depreciation ceases and an impairment loss was recognized if the
carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value less cost to
sell. Assets held for sale were included in Other Assets on the
consolidated balance sheet.
The restructuring charges recorded during fiscal year 2003 also
included approximately $107.9 million for other exit costs.
Approximately $64.4 million and $42.8 million of this
amount were classified as a component of cost of sales in the
first and third quarters of fiscal year 2003, respectively. The
third quarter charges reflect a reversal of prior period
restructuring charges of approximately $7.3 million
relating to revisions of previous estimates, primarily related
to the companys ability to subsequently successfully
negotiate reductions in certain contractual obligations. Other
exit costs included contractual obligations totaling
$75.6 million, which were incurred directly as a result of
the various exit plans. The contractual obligations consisted of
facility lease terminations amounting to $49.9 million,
equipment lease terminations amounting to $14.4 million and
payments to suppliers and third parties to terminate contractual
agreements amounting to $11.3 million. Expenses associated
with lease obligations are estimated based on future lease
payment, less any estimated sublease income. The Company expects
to make payments associated with its contractual obligations
with respect to facility and equipment leases through the end of
fiscal year 2017. Other exit costs also included charges of
$19.7 million relating to asset impairments resulting from
customer contracts that were terminated by the Company as a
result of various facility closures. These asset impairments
were determined based on the difference between the carrying
amount and the realizable value of the impaired inventory and
accounts receivable. The Company disposed of the impaired
assets, primarily through scrapping and write-offs, by the end
of fiscal year 2003. Other exit costs also included
$11.0 million of net facility refurbishment and abandonment
costs related to certain building repair work necessary to
prepare the exited facilities for sale or to return the
facilities to their respective landlords. The remaining
$1.6 million primarily included incremental amounts of
legal and consulting costs, and various government obligations
for which the Company is liable as a direct result of its
facility closures.
The following table summarizes the provisions, payments and the
accrual balance relating to restructuring costs initiated prior
to March 31, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
Severance | |
|
Exit Costs | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Balance as of March 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
4,720 |
|
|
$ |
15,658 |
|
|
$ |
20,378 |
|
Activities during fiscal year 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(3,466 |
) |
|
|
(8,869 |
) |
|
|
(12,335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2005
|
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
|
6,789 |
|
|
|
8,043 |
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion (classified as other current liabilities)
|
|
|
(353 |
) |
|
|
(3,027 |
) |
|
|
(3,380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued facility closure costs, net of current portion
(classified as other long-term liabilities)
|
|
$ |
901 |
|
|
$ |
3,762 |
|
|
$ |
4,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
11. |
OTHER CHARGES (INCOME), NET |
During fiscal year 2005, the Company realized a foreign exchange
gain of $29.3 million from the liquidation of certain
international entities, offset by a loss of $8.2 million
for other than temporary impairment of its investments in
certain non-publicly traded technology companies and
$7.6 million of charges relating to the resignation of
Robert R.B. Dykes from his position as Chief Financial Officer.
In connection with his termination of employment, the Company
amended certain of Mr. Dykes stock option agreements
to provide for full acceleration of vesting of approximately
1.2 million of Mr. Dykes outstanding but
unvested stock options and extension of the expiration date of
approximately 1.5 million stock options to five years after
his employment termination date. Such options would otherwise
have expired ninety days after the termination of employment.
This resulted in a charge of approximately $5.6 million. In
addition, the Company made a lump-sum cash payment of
approximately $2.0 million to Mr. Dykes.
During fiscal year 2003, the Company recorded $7.4 million
related to the impairment of investments in certain non-publicly
traded technology companies.
|
|
12. |
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
Since June 2003, neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries
have made any loans to its executive officers. Prior to that
time, the Company extended loans to several of its executive
officers. Each loan was evidenced by a promissory note in favor
of the Company and was generally secured by a deed of trust on
property of the officer. Certain notes were non-interest bearing
and others had interest rates ranging from 1.49% to 5.85%. There
were no loans outstanding from the Companys executive
officers as of March 31, 2005. The outstanding balance of
the loans, including accrued interest was approximately
$9.5 million as of March 31, 2004. Additionally, in
connection with an investment partnership, one of the
Companys subsidiaries made loans to several of its
executive officers to fund their contributions to the investment
partnership. Each loan was evidenced by a full-recourse
promissory note in favor of the Company. Interest rates on the
notes range from 5.05% to 6.40%. The remaining balance of these
loans, including accrued interest, as of March 31, 2005 and
2004 was approximately $1.8 million and $2.2 million,
respectively.
|
|
13. |
BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS |
The business acquisitions described below were accounted for
using the purchase method of accounting, and accordingly, the
fair value of the net assets acquired and the results of the
acquired businesses were included in the Companys
consolidated statements of operations from the acquisition dates
forward. Comparative pro forma information, with the exception
of Hughes Software Systems Limited (HSS), has not been
presented, as the results of the operations of the acquired
businesses were not material to the Companys consolidated
financial statements on either an individual or an aggregate
basis. The Company has not finalized the allocation of the
consideration for certain of its recently completed acquisitions
and expects to complete this by the end of the first quarter of
fiscal year 2006.
On June 29, 2004, the Company entered into an asset
purchase agreement with Nortel providing for Flextronicss
purchase of certain of Nortels optical, wireless, wireline
and enterprise manufacturing operations and optical design
operations. The assets to be acquired consist primarily of
inventory and capital equipment currently in use. The purchase
of these assets will occur in stages, with the first and second
stages completed in November 2004 and February 2005, and further
stages scheduled in multiple phases during fiscal year 2006.
Subject to closing the remaining asset acquisitions, Flextronics
will provide the majority of Nortels systems integration
activities, final assembly, testing and repair operations, along
with the management of the
71
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
related supply chain and suppliers, under a four-year
manufacturing agreement. Additionally, under a three-year design
services agreement, Flextronics will provide Nortel with design
services for end-to-end, carrier grade optical network products.
As part of this transaction, Flextronics anticipates hiring a
total of approximately 2,350 of Nortels manufacturing
employees and design engineers. As of March 31, 2005, the
Company has hired approximately 920 manufacturing employees and
160 optical design engineers.
If any of the acquired inventories have not been used by the
first anniversary of the applicable closing date, the Company
will have a put right under which, subject to
certain closing conditions, it may then sell that inventory back
to Nortel. Similarly, if any of the acquired equipment is unused
at the first anniversary of the applicable closing date, then
subject to certain conditions, the Company will be entitled to
sell it back to Nortel. The Company intends to use its cash
balances and revolving line of credit to fund the remaining
purchase price for the assets yet to be acquired.
The Company anticipates that the aggregate purchase price for
the assets acquired from Nortel will be in the range of
approximately $650 million to $700 million. The
purchase price will be allocated to the fair value of the
acquired assets, which management currently estimates will be
approximately $415 million to $465 million for
inventory, approximately $35 million for fixed assets, and
the remaining $200 million for intangible assets. The
Company completed the closing of the optical design businesses
in Canada and Northern Ireland on November 1, 2004, which
resulted in the payment of $12.8 million to Nortel. On
February 8, 2005 the Company also completed the closing of
the manufacturing operations and related assets (including
product integration, testing, repair and logistics operations)
in Montreal, Quebec, which resulted in the payment of
$83.7 million to Nortel. In connection with these closings,
the Company entered into promissory notes amounting to
$185.7 million, which are due in three quarterly payments
in calendar year 2005. The promissory notes are classified as
other current liabilities as of March 31, 2005. The
purchases to date have resulted in purchased intangible assets
of $20.7 million and goodwill of $86.7 million, based
on third-party valuations.
The Company is currently in discussion with Nortel regarding the
timing of the cash payments associated with the remaining
factory transfers.
|
|
|
Hughes Software Systems Limited (now known as Flextronics
Software Systems Limited) |
In October 2004, the Company completed the acquisition of
approximately 70% of the total outstanding shares of Hughes
Software Systems Limited (HSS). Total purchase price, net of
cash acquired amounted to approximately $256.2 million
including acquisition costs. The fair value of the
Companys proportionate share of net assets acquired
amounted to approximately $8.0 million. The purchase price
resulted in purchased intangible assets of $31.8 million
and goodwill of $210.4 million, based on third-party
valuations.
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents
the combined results of operations of Flextronics and HSS as if
the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of fiscal years
2005 and 2004, after giving effect to certain adjustments and
related income tax effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except | |
|
|
per share data) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
15,957,695 |
|
|
$ |
14,617,250 |
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
344,345 |
|
|
|
(346,631 |
) |
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
(0.66 |
) |
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
(0.66 |
) |
On May 4, 2005, the Company announced its proposal to
acquire the remaining 30% of the outstanding shares of HSS. See
Note 16, Subsequent Events for further
discussion.
72
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During fiscal year 2005, the Company completed certain
acquisitions that were not individually significant to the
Companys results of operations and financial position. The
aggregate cash purchase price for the acquisitions amounted to
approximately $119.8 million, net of cash acquired. In
addition, the Company issued approximately 9.9 million
ordinary shares, which equated to approximately
$125.0 million, as part of the purchase price for the
acquisitions. The fair value of the ordinary shares issued was
determined based on the quoted market prices of the
Companys ordinary shares two days before and after the
date the terms of the acquisitions were agreed to and announced.
Goodwill and intangibles resulting from the acquisitions during
fiscal year 2005, as well as contingent purchase price
adjustments for certain historical acquisitions, totaled
approximately $348.3 million. The fair value of the net
liabilities acquired through these acquisitions totaled
approximately $201.1 million. The purchase prices of the
acquisitions have been allocated on the basis of the estimated
fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
purchase price for certain of these acquisitions is subject to
adjustments for contingent consideration, based upon the
businesses achieving specified levels of earnings through
December 31, 2010. The contingent consideration has not
been recorded as part of the purchase price, pending the outcome
of the contingency.
During fiscal year 2005, the Company paid approximately
$2.5 million in cash, and issued approximately 136,000
ordinary shares for contingent purchase price adjustments
relating to certain historical acquisitions.
During fiscal year 2004, the Company completed certain
acquisitions that were not individually significant to the
Companys results of operations and financial position. The
aggregate cash purchase price for the acquisitions amounted to
$120.0 million, net of cash acquired. The fair value of the
net liabilities assumed in fiscal year 2004 amounted to
approximately $321.6 million. The costs of these
acquisitions have been allocated on the basis of the estimated
fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
purchase price for certain of these acquisitions is subject to
adjustments for contingent consideration, based upon the
businesses achieving specified levels of earnings through
December 2006. The contingent consideration has not been
recorded as part of the purchase price, pending the outcome of
the contingency.
All of the above acquisitions were accounted for using the
purchase method of accounting, and accordingly, the results of
the acquired businesses were included in the Companys
consolidated statements of operations from the acquisition dates
forward. Comparative pro forma information has not been
presented, as the results of operations were not material to the
Companys consolidated financial statements on either an
individual or an aggregate basis. Goodwill and intangibles
resulting from the Companys fiscal year 2004 acquisitions
amounted to approximately $468.6 million.
During fiscal year 2003, the Company acquired Xeroxs
manufacturing operations in Aguascalientes, Mexico; El Segundo,
California; Mitcheldean, U.K.; Penang, Malaysia; Resende,
Brazil; Toronto, Canada; and Venray, Netherlands. The aggregate
purchase price for the acquisition amounted to approximately
$179.5 million, of which $14.4 million was paid in
fiscal year 2003. The fair value of the net assets acquired in
fiscal year 2003, amounted to approximately $9.4 million,
including estimated acquisition costs. In connection with the
acquisition of the operations, the Company entered into a
five-year agreement for the manufacture of certain Xerox office
equipment and components.
73
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In August 2002, the Company acquired all of the outstanding
shares of NatSteel Broadway Ltd. for an aggregate purchase price
of approximately $356.9 million, net of cash acquired. The
fair value of the net assets acquired amounted to approximately
$41.5 million, including estimated acquisition costs.
NatSteel Broadways operations include manufacturing
facilities in China and Hungary.
During fiscal year 2003, the Company completed certain other
business acquisitions that were not individually significant to
the Companys results of operations and financial position.
The aggregate cash purchase price for these acquisitions
amounted to approximately $104.9 million, net of cash
acquired. The aggregate fair value of the net liabilities
acquired for these acquisitions amounted to approximately
$34.2 million, including estimated acquisition costs.
Additionally, approximately $25.4 million was paid and
approximately 1.6 million ordinary shares were issued
related to contingent purchase price adjustments for certain
historical acquisitions.
All of the above acquisitions were accounted for using the
purchase method of accounting, and accordingly, the results of
the acquired businesses were included in the Companys
consolidated statements of operations from the acquisition dates
forward. Comparative pro forma information has not been
presented, as the results of operations were not material to the
Companys consolidated financial statements on either an
individual or an aggregate basis. Goodwill and intangibles
resulting from the Companys fiscal year 2003 acquisitions,
as well as contingent purchase price adjustments for certain
historical acquisitions amounted to approximately
$557.3 million.
The Company operates and is managed internally by two operating
segments that have been combined for operating segment
disclosures, as they do not meet the quantitative thresholds for
separate disclosure established in SFAS No. 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information. Operating segments are defined as components
of an enterprise about which separate financial information is
available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating
decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to
allocate resources and in assessing performance. The
Companys chief operating decision maker is the Chief
Executive Officer.
74
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Geographic information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Net Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
$ |
8,190,470 |
|
|
$ |
6,878,458 |
|
|
$ |
5,060,085 |
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
2,698,093 |
|
|
|
2,099,713 |
|
|
|
3,101,589 |
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
5,779,337 |
|
|
|
6,202,207 |
|
|
|
5,933,859 |
|
|
Intercompany eliminations
|
|
|
(759,677 |
) |
|
|
(649,962 |
) |
|
|
(716,834 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
15,908,223 |
|
|
$ |
14,530,416 |
|
|
$ |
13,378,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
$ |
312,406 |
|
|
$ |
152,117 |
|
|
$ |
187,785 |
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
4,667 |
|
|
|
(204,288 |
) |
|
|
(232,094 |
) |
|
Europe
|
|
|
5,981 |
|
|
|
(170,915 |
) |
|
|
(27,127 |
) |
|
Intercompany eliminations
|
|
|
(46,145 |
) |
|
|
(197,033 |
) |
|
|
(75,803 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
276,909 |
|
|
$ |
(420,119 |
) |
|
$ |
(147,239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
$ |
806,617 |
|
|
$ |
700,262 |
|
|
$ |
758,331 |
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
422,644 |
|
|
|
402,031 |
|
|
|
544,348 |
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
475,255 |
|
|
|
522,707 |
|
|
|
663,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,704,516 |
|
|
$ |
1,625,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,965,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization*:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
$ |
137,482 |
|
|
$ |
112,357 |
|
|
$ |
110,485 |
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
73,815 |
|
|
|
80,650 |
|
|
|
97,433 |
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
140,214 |
|
|
|
155,082 |
|
|
|
141,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
351,511 |
|
|
$ |
348,089 |
|
|
$ |
349,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Capital Expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
$ |
188,910 |
|
|
$ |
142,425 |
|
|
$ |
125,952 |
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
59,829 |
|
|
|
81,454 |
|
|
|
50,153 |
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
40,941 |
|
|
|
102,869 |
|
|
|
74,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
289,680 |
|
|
$ |
326,748 |
|
|
$ |
250,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Excludes restructuring charges related property and equipment
impairment charges of $12.7 million, $331.2 million,
and $70.6 million in fiscal years 2005, 2004, and 2003,
respectively. See Note 10, Restructuring
Charges, for additional information regarding those
charges. |
Revenues are attributable to the country in which the product is
manufactured.
For purposes of the preceding tables, Asia includes
China, Japan, India, Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Mauritius,
Singapore, Taiwan and Thailand; Americas includes
Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Mexico, Venezuela, and the
United States; Europe includes Austria, the Czech
Republic, Denmark,
75
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy,
Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Scotland, South Africa,
Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom.
During fiscal year 2005, 2004 and 2003, net sales generated from
Singapore, the principal country of domicile, was
$216.5 million, $237.6 million and
$242.8 million, respectively.
China, Malaysia and Hungary accounted for approximately 29%, 20%
and 14% of the consolidated net sales, respectively, during
fiscal year 2005. No other foreign country accounted for more
than 10% of net sales in fiscal year 2005. As of March 31,
2005, China, Malaysia, US/ Canada and Hungary accounted for
approximately 30%, 12%, 12% and 10% of consolidated long-lived
assets, respectively. No other foreign country accounted for
more than 10% of long-lived assets as of March 31, 2005.
China, Hungary and Malaysia accounted for approximately 26%,
18%, and 14% of net sales, respectively, during fiscal year
2004. No other foreign country accounted for more than 10% of
net sales in fiscal year 2004. As of March 31, 2004, China,
Malaysia, US/ Canada and Hungary accounted for approximately
27%, 12%, 13%, and 12% of long-lived assets, respectively. No
other foreign country accounted for more than 10% of long-lived
assets at March 31, 2004.
China, Hungary, Malaysia and Mexico accounted for approximately
18%, 11%, 15% and 12% of net sales, respectively, during fiscal
year 2003. No other foreign country accounted for more than 10%
of net sales in fiscal year 2003. As of March 31, 2003,
China and Malaysia accounted for approximately 25% and 11% of
long-lived assets, respectively. No other foreign country
accounted for more than 10% of long-lived assets at
March 31, 2003.
|
|
15. |
CONSOLIDATION OF VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES |
Effective April 1, 2003, the Company adopted Financial
Accounting Standard Boards Interpretation No. 46
(FIN 46), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities, which expands upon and strengthens
existing accounting guidance concerning when a company should
include in its financial statements the assets, liabilities and
activities of another entity. Prior to the issuance of
FIN 46, a company generally included another entity in its
consolidated financial statements only if it controlled the
entity through voting interests. FIN 46 now requires a
variable interest entity, as defined in FIN 46, to be
consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a
majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest
entitys activities or entitled to receive a majority of
the entitys residual returns or both. FIN 46 also
requires disclosures about variable interest entities that the
company is not required to consolidate but in which it has a
significant variable interest.
The Company has variable interests in real estate assets subject
to operating lease arrangements located in Mexico and Texas. The
principal impact of the adoption of FIN 46 was the
recording of additions to land and building and long-term debt
in the amount of $89.9 million at March 31, 2004. The
cumulative effect of adopting FIN 46 was not material to
the Companys financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
On May 4, 2005, the Company announced its proposal to
acquire all of the outstanding publicly-held shares
(approximately 10.4 million shares or 30%) of its
India-based subsidiary, Flextronics Software Systems Limited.
The Company offered to acquire the shares at Rs 575 per
share ($13.23 per share), subject to shareholder and
regulatory approvals, including the number of shares required
for delisting being offered at this price. There is no
obligation for shareholders to accept this open offer and there
is no assurance that any shares will be offered for sale to the
Company. The Company reserves the right not to acquire the
offered shares if the final price, as determined by the
Securities and Exchange Board of India, is more than Rs
575 per share.
76
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
17. |
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) |
The following table contains unaudited quarterly financial data
for fiscal years 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2005 | |
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
First | |
|
Second | |
|
Third | |
|
Fourth | |
|
First | |
|
Second | |
|
Third | |
|
Fourth | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | |
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
3,880,448 |
|
|
$ |
4,138,249 |
|
|
$ |
4,276,614 |
|
|
$ |
3,612,912 |
|
|
$ |
3,106,677 |
|
|
$ |
3,503,242 |
|
|
$ |
4,152,344 |
|
|
$ |
3,768,153 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
3,633,516 |
|
|
|
3,867,385 |
|
|
|
3,976,832 |
|
|
|
3,350,127 |
|
|
|
2,941,636 |
|
|
|
3,320,772 |
|
|
|
3,912,912 |
|
|
|
3,529,256 |
|
Restructuring and other charges
|
|
|
20,991 |
|
|
|
25,704 |
|
|
|
24,076 |
|
|
|
7,610 |
|
|
|
308,835 |
|
|
|
42,362 |
|
|
|
50,553 |
|
|
|
75,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
225,941 |
|
|
|
245,160 |
|
|
|
275,706 |
|
|
|
255,175 |
|
|
|
(143,794 |
) |
|
|
140,108 |
|
|
|
188,879 |
|
|
|
163,342 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
141,596 |
|
|
|
139,022 |
|
|
|
143,330 |
|
|
|
144,585 |
|
|
|
116,415 |
|
|
|
108,940 |
|
|
|
121,597 |
|
|
|
140,335 |
|
Intangibles amortization
|
|
|
8,661 |
|
|
|
8,683 |
|
|
|
9,201 |
|
|
|
15,975 |
|
|
|
8,817 |
|
|
|
8,573 |
|
|
|
9,553 |
|
|
|
9,772 |
|
Restructuring and other charges (income)
|
|
|
2,597 |
|
|
|
7,798 |
|
|
|
(8,323 |
) |
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
18,273 |
|
|
|
17,890 |
|
|
|
20,466 |
|
|
|
6,414 |
|
Interest and other expense, net
|
|
|
18,286 |
|
|
|
22,429 |
|
|
|
27,240 |
|
|
|
26,250 |
|
|
|
25,911 |
|
|
|
20,703 |
|
|
|
13,453 |
|
|
|
17,633 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,328 |
|
|
|
8,695 |
|
|
|
95,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
54,801 |
|
|
|
67,228 |
|
|
|
104,258 |
|
|
|
50,622 |
|
|
|
(321,905 |
) |
|
|
(111,212 |
) |
|
|
23,810 |
|
|
|
(10,812 |
) |
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
(19,521 |
) |
|
|
(25,394 |
) |
|
|
5,575 |
|
|
|
(23,622 |
) |
|
|
(32,190 |
) |
|
|
(11,122 |
) |
|
|
2,381 |
|
|
|
(26,810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
74,322 |
|
|
$ |
92,622 |
|
|
$ |
98,683 |
|
|
$ |
74,244 |
|
|
$ |
(289,715 |
) |
|
$ |
(100,090 |
) |
|
$ |
21,429 |
|
|
$ |
15,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
(0.56 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
(0.56 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing per share amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
530,626 |
|
|
|
551,875 |
|
|
|
562,200 |
|
|
|
566,912 |
|
|
|
521,000 |
|
|
|
523,529 |
|
|
|
527,321 |
|
|
|
529,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
568,013 |
|
|
|
582,206 |
|
|
|
594,081 |
|
|
|
597,628 |
|
|
|
521,000 |
|
|
|
523,529 |
|
|
|
561,438 |
|
|
|
569,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
ITEM 9. |
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
Not applicable.
|
|
ITEM 9A. |
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
|
|
(a) |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
As of March 31, 2005, the Company carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of
the Companys management, including the Companys
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation,
the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2005, such
disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by the Company in the
reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported on a timely basis.
|
|
(b) |
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting |
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term
is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. As of March 31, 2005, under the
supervision and with the participation of management, including
the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, an evaluation was conducted of the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based
on the framework in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on that
evaluation, management concluded that the Companys
internal control over financial reporting was adequately
designed and operating effectively as of March 31, 2005.
Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal
control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable
assurance and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Managements annual assessment of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of March 31,
2005 excluded all business acquisitions that were completed
after September 30, 2004, which represented approximately
2% and 11% of total revenue and assets, respectively, of the
related consolidated financial statement amounts for, and as of,
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005. The excluded
acquisitions consisted of Nortels optical design
businesses in Canada and Northern Ireland and manufacturing
operations in Montreal, Quebec, Hughes Software Systems Limited,
and certain other business acquisitions that were not
individually significant to the Companys results of
operations and financial position.
Managements annual assessment of the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
March 31, 2005 has been audited by Deloitte &
Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as
stated in their report which appears in this Item under the
heading Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm.
|
|
(c) |
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting |
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial
reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
78
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Flextronics International Ltd.
Singapore
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Annual Report on Internal Control
Over Financial Reporting (Managements Report),
that Flextronics International Ltd. and subsidiaries (the
Company) maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of March 31, 2005, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. As described in
Managements Report, management excluded from their
assessment the internal control over financial reporting for all
business acquisitions that were completed after
September 30, 2004, which represented approximately 2% and
11% of total revenue and assets, respectively, of the related
consolidated financial statement amounts for, and as of, the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2005. The excluded acquisitions
consisted of Nortels optical design businesses in Canada
and Northern Ireland and manufacturing operations in Montreal,
Quebec, Hughes Software Systems Limited, and certain other
business acquisitions that were not individually significant to
the Companys results of operations and financial position.
Accordingly, our audit did not include the internal control over
financial reporting at these acquired businesses. The
Companys management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on managements assessment and an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of March 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, based on the criteria
79
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also in our opinion,
the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of March 31,
2005, based on the criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule as of and for the year ended March 31, 2005 of the
Company and our report dated June 14, 2005 expressed an
unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial
statement schedule.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
San Jose, California
June 14, 2005
|
|
ITEM 9B. |
OTHER INFORMATION |
Not applicable.
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10. |
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT |
Information with respect to this item may be found in our
definitive proxy statement to be delivered to shareholders in
connection with our 2005 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders.
Such information is incorporated by reference.
|
|
ITEM 11. |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Information with respect to this item may be found in our
definitive proxy statement to be delivered to shareholders in
connection with our 2005 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders.
Such information is incorporated by reference.
|
|
ITEM 12. |
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS |
Information with respect to this item may be found in our
definitive proxy statement to be delivered to shareholders in
connection with our 2005 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders.
Such information is incorporated by reference.
|
|
ITEM 13. |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS |
Information with respect to this item may be found in our
definitive proxy statement to be delivered to shareholders in
connection with our 2005 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders.
Such information is incorporated by reference.
|
|
ITEM 14. |
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES |
Information with respect to this item may be found in our
definitive proxy statement to be delivered to shareholders in
connection with our 2005 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders.
Such information is incorporated by reference.
80
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15. |
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
(a) Documents filed as part of this annual report on
Form 10-K:
|
|
|
1. Financial Statements. See Item 8,
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. |
|
|
2. Financial Statement Schedules. The following
financial statement schedule is filed as part of this report and
should be read together with our financial statements: |
|
|
|
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts. |
|
|
|
3. Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed with
this annual report on Form 10-K: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filed |
No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Date |
|
No. |
|
Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
.01 |
|
Memorandum and New Articles of Association of the Registrant. |
|
|
10-Q |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
02-09-01 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.01 |
|
U.S. Dollar Indenture dated June 29, 2000 between the
Registrant and J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National
Association (successor to Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust
Company, N.A.), as trustee. |
|
|
10-Q |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
08-14-00 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.02 |
|
Euro Indenture dated as of June 29, 2000 between Registrant
and J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association
(successor to Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust Company, N.A.), as
trustee. |
|
|
10-Q |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
08-14-00 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.03 |
|
Supplemental Euro Indenture, dated as of March 29, 2005, by
and between Flextronics International Ltd., as issuer, and
J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association (as
successor by merger to Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust Company,
National Association), as trustee. |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
04-01-05 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.04 |
|
Indenture dated as of May 8, 2003 between Registrant and
J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association, as trustee. |
|
|
10-K |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
06-06-03 |
|
|
|
4.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.05 |
|
Indenture dated as of August 5, 2003 between Registrant and
J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association, as trustee. |
|
|
10-Q |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
08-11-03 |
|
|
|
4.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.06 |
|
Note Purchase Agreement dated as of March 2, 2003
between Registrant, acting through its branch office in Hong
Kong, and Silver Lake Partners Cayman, L.P., Silver Lake
Investors Cayman, L.P., Silver Lake Technology Investors Cayman,
L.P. and Integral Capital Partners VI, L.P. |
|
|
10-K |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
06-06-03 |
|
|
|
4.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filed |
No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Date |
|
No. |
|
Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.07 |
|
Credit Agreement dated as of May 27, 2005 among Flextronics
International Ltd., the lenders named therein, ABN AMRO Bank
N.V., as administrative agent, ABN AMRO Incorporated, as lead
arranger and sole bookrunner, The Bank of Nova Scotia, as
co-lead arranger and syndication agent, Bank of America, N.A.,
Citicorp USA, Inc., Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch and BNP
Paribas, as co-documentation agents, Credit Suisse, Cayman
Islands Branch, Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation and
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB, as senior managing agents,
HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Barclays Bank PLC, KeyBank
National Association, Royal Bank of Canada and UBS Securities
LLC, as managing agents, and Bank of America, N.A., as the
issuer of letters of credit thereunder. |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
06-03-05 |
|
|
|
4.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.08 |
|
Credit Agreement dated as of May 27, 2005 among Flextronics
International USA, Inc., the lenders named therein, ABN AMRO
Bank N.V., as administrative agent, ABN AMRO Incorporated, as
lead arranger and sole bookrunner, The Bank of Nova Scotia, as
co-lead arranger and syndication agent, Bank of America, N.A.,
Citicorp USA, Inc., Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch and BNP
Paribas, as co-documentation agents, Credit Suisse, Cayman
Islands Branch, Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation and
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB, as senior managing agents,
HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Barclays Bank PLC, KeyBank
National Association, Royal Bank of Canada and UBS Securities
LLC, as managing agents, and Bank of America, N.A., as the
issuer of letters of credit thereunder. |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
06-03-05 |
|
|
|
4.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.09 |
|
Indenture, dated as of November 17, 2004, between
Flextronics International Ltd. and J.P. Morgan Trust
Company, National Association, as Trustee. |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
11-19-04 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.10 |
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 17,
2004, among Flextronics International Ltd. and Credit Suisse
First Boston LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Banc of America
Securities LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Lehman Brothers
Inc., BNP Paribas Securities Corp., McDonald Investments Inc.,
RBC Capital Markets Corporation, Scotia Capital (USA) Inc.,
ABN AMBRO Incorporated, HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. and UBS
Securities LLC, as Initial Purchasers. |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
11-19-04 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filed |
No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Date |
|
No. |
|
Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.01 |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and its
Directors and certain officers. |
|
|
S-1 |
|
|
|
33-74622 |
|
|
|
01-31-94 |
|
|
|
10.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.02 |
|
Registrants 1993 Share Option Plan. |
|
|
S-8 |
|
|
|
333-55850 |
|
|
|
02-16-01 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.03 |
|
Registrants 1997 Employee Share Purchase Plan. |
|
|
S-8 |
|
|
|
333-101327 |
|
|
|
11-20-02 |
|
|
|
4.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.04 |
|
Registrants 1997 Interim Stock Plan. |
|
|
S-8 |
|
|
|
333-42255 |
|
|
|
12-15-97 |
|
|
|
99.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.05 |
|
Registrants 1998 Interim Stock Plan. |
|
|
S-8 |
|
|
|
333-71049 |
|
|
|
01-22-99 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.06 |
|
Registrants 1999 Interim Stock Plan. |
|
|
S-8 |
|
|
|
333-71049 |
|
|
|
01-22-99 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.07 |
|
Registrants 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
10 |
.08 |
|
Registrants 2002 Interim Incentive Plan. |
|
|
S-8 |
|
|
|
333-103189 |
|
|
|
02-13-03 |
|
|
|
4.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.09 |
|
Flextronics International USA, Inc. 401(k) Plan. |
|
|
S-1 |
|
|
|
33-74622 |
|
|
|
01-31-94 |
|
|
|
10.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.10 |
|
Registrants 2004 Award Plan for New Employees, as amended. |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
05-18-05 |
|
|
|
10.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.11 |
|
Form of Secured Full Recourse Promissory Note executed by
certain executive officers of the Registrant in favor of
Flextronics International, NV, in connection with Glouple
Ventures 2000 I. |
|
|
10-K |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
06-29-01 |
|
|
|
10.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.12 |
|
Form of Secured Full Recourse Promissory Note executed by
certain executive officers of the Registrant in favor of
Flextronics International, NV, in connection with Glouple
Ventures 2000 II. |
|
|
10-K |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
06-29-01 |
|
|
|
10.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.13 |
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2004, by and
among the Registrant and Nortel Networks Limited. |
|
|
10-Q |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
08-06-04 |
|
|
|
10.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.14 |
|
Supplemental Contingent Share Award Agreement dated
August 17, 2004 by and between Michael E. Marks and the
Registrant. |
|
|
10-Q |
|
|
|
333-120291 |
|
|
|
11-08-04 |
|
|
|
10.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
.01 |
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
23 |
.01 |
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
24 |
.01 |
|
Power of Attorney (included on the signature page to this
Form 10-K). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
31 |
.01 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
31 |
.02 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
32 |
.01 |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
32 |
.02 |
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement. |
83
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirement of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
Flextronics International Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
Michael E. Marks |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
Date: June 14, 2005
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose
signature appears below constitutes and appoints jointly and
severally, Michael E. Marks and Thomas J. Smach and each one of
them, his attorneys-in-fact, each with the power of
substitution, for him in any and all capacities, to sign any and
all amendments to this Report, and to file the same, with
exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith,
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying
and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his
substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MICHAEL E. MARKS
Michael
E. Marks |
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive
Officer) |
|
June 14, 2005 |
|
/s/ THOMAS J. SMACH
Thomas
J. Smach |
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
June 14, 2005 |
|
/s/ RICHARD L. SHARP
Richard
L. Sharp |
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
June 14, 2005 |
|
/s/ JAMES A. DAVIDSON
James
A. Davidson |
|
Director |
|
June 14, 2005 |
|
/s/ PATRICK FOLEY
Patrick
Foley |
|
Director |
|
June 14, 2005 |
|
/s/ MICHAEL J. MORITZ
Michael
J. Moritz |
|
Director |
|
June 14, 2005 |
|
/s/ LIP-BU TAN
Lip-Bu
Tan |
|
Director |
|
June 14, 2005 |
84
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
SCHEDULE II
Years Ended March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
|
|
Charged to | |
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
|
Beginning | |
|
Effect of | |
|
Costs and | |
|
Deductions/ | |
|
End of | |
|
|
of Year | |
|
Acquisitions | |
|
Expenses | |
|
Write-Offs | |
|
Year | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2003
|
|
$ |
41,649 |
|
|
$ |
6,754 |
|
|
$ |
2,647 |
|
|
$ |
(13,424 |
) |
|
$ |
37,626 |
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
37,626 |
|
|
$ |
9,481 |
|
|
$ |
1,256 |
|
|
$ |
(9,627 |
) |
|
$ |
38,736 |
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
38,736 |
|
|
$ |
4,683 |
|
|
$ |
4,847 |
|
|
$ |
(17,100 |
) |
|
$ |
31,166 |
|
85
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filed |
No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Date |
|
No. |
|
Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
.01 |
|
Memorandum and New Articles of Association of the Registrant. |
|
|
10-Q |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
02-09-01 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.01 |
|
U.S. Dollar Indenture dated June 29, 2000 between the
Registrant and J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National
Association (successor to Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust
Company, N.A.), as trustee. |
|
|
10-Q |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
08-14-00 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.02 |
|
Euro Indenture dated as of June 29, 2000 between Registrant
and J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association
(successor to Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust Company, N.A.), as
trustee. |
|
|
10-Q |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
08-14-00 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.03 |
|
Supplemental Euro Indenture, dated as of March 29, 2005, by
and between Flextronics International Ltd., as issuer, and
J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association (as
successor by merger to Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust Company,
National Association), as trustee. |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
04-01-05 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.04 |
|
Indenture dated as of May 8, 2003 between Registrant and
J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association, as trustee. |
|
|
10-K |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
06-06-03 |
|
|
|
4.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.05 |
|
Indenture dated as of August 5, 2003 between Registrant and
J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association, as trustee. |
|
|
10-Q |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
08-11-03 |
|
|
|
4.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.06 |
|
Note Purchase Agreement dated as of March 2, 2003
between Registrant, acting through its branch office in Hong
Kong, and Silver Lake Partners Cayman, L.P., Silver Lake
Investors Cayman, L.P., Silver Lake Technology Investors Cayman,
L.P. and Integral Capital Partners VI, L.P. |
|
|
10-K |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
06-06-03 |
|
|
|
4.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.07 |
|
Credit Agreement dated as of May 27, 2005 among Flextronics
International Ltd., the lenders named therein, ABN AMRO Bank
N.V., as administrative agent, ABN AMRO Incorporated, as lead
arranger and sole bookrunner, The Bank of Nova Scotia, as
co-lead arranger and syndication agent, Bank of America, N.A.,
Citicorp USA, Inc., Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch and BNP
Paribas, as co-documentation agents, Credit Suisse, Cayman
Islands Branch, Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation and
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB, as senior managing agents,
HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Barclays Bank PLC, KeyBank
National Association, Royal Bank of Canada and UBS Securities
LLC, as managing agents, and Bank of America, N.A., as the
issuer of letters of credit thereunder. |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
06-03-05 |
|
|
|
4.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filed |
No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Date |
|
No. |
|
Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.08 |
|
Credit Agreement dated as of May 27, 2005 among Flextronics
International USA, Inc., the lenders named therein, ABN AMRO
Bank N.V., as administrative agent, ABN AMRO Incorporated, as
lead arranger and sole bookrunner, The Bank of Nova Scotia, as
co-lead arranger and syndication agent, Bank of America, N.A.,
Citicorp USA, Inc., Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch and BNP
Paribas, as co-documentation agents, Credit Suisse, Cayman
Islands Branch, Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation and
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB, as senior managing agents,
HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Barclays Bank PLC, KeyBank
National Association, Royal Bank of Canada and UBS Securities
LLC, as managing agents, and Bank of America, N.A., as the
issuer of letters of credit thereunder. |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
06-03-05 |
|
|
|
4.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.09 |
|
Indenture, dated as of November 17, 2004, between
Flextronics International Ltd. and J.P. Morgan Trust
Company, National Association, as Trustee. |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
11-19-04 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.10 |
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 17,
2004, among Flextronics International Ltd. and Credit Suisse
First Boston LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Banc of America
Securities LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Lehman Brothers
Inc., BNP Paribas Securities Corp., McDonald Investments Inc.,
RBC Capital Markets Corporation, Scotia Capital (USA) Inc.,
ABN AMBRO Incorporated, HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. and UBS
Securities LLC, as Initial Purchasers. |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
11-19-04 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.01 |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and its
Directors and certain officers. |
|
|
S-1 |
|
|
|
33-74622 |
|
|
|
01-31-94 |
|
|
|
10.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.02 |
|
Registrants 1993 Share Option Plan. |
|
|
S-8 |
|
|
|
333-55850 |
|
|
|
02-16-01 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.03 |
|
Registrants 1997 Employee Share Purchase Plan. |
|
|
S-8 |
|
|
|
333-101327 |
|
|
|
11-20-02 |
|
|
|
4.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.04 |
|
Registrants 1997 Interim Stock Plan. |
|
|
S-8 |
|
|
|
333-42255 |
|
|
|
12-15-97 |
|
|
|
99.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.05 |
|
Registrants 1998 Interim Stock Plan. |
|
|
S-8 |
|
|
|
333-71049 |
|
|
|
01-22-99 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.06 |
|
Registrants 1999 Interim Stock Plan. |
|
|
S-8 |
|
|
|
333-71049 |
|
|
|
01-22-99 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.07 |
|
Registrants 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
10 |
.08 |
|
Registrants 2002 Interim Incentive Plan. |
|
|
S-8 |
|
|
|
333-103189 |
|
|
|
02-13-03 |
|
|
|
4.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.09 |
|
Flextronics International USA, Inc. 401(k) Plan. |
|
|
S-1 |
|
|
|
33-74622 |
|
|
|
01-31-94 |
|
|
|
10.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.10 |
|
Registrants 2004 Award Plan for New Employees, as amended. |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
05-18-05 |
|
|
|
10.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filed |
No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Date |
|
No. |
|
Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.11 |
|
Form of Secured Full Recourse Promissory Note executed by
certain executive officers of the Registrant in favor of
Flextronics International, NV, in connection with Glouple
Ventures 2000 I. |
|
|
10-K |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
06-29-01 |
|
|
|
10.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.12 |
|
Form of Secured Full Recourse Promissory Note executed by
certain executive officers of the Registrant in favor of
Flextronics International, NV, in connection with Glouple
Ventures 2000 II. |
|
|
10-K |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
06-29-01 |
|
|
|
10.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.13 |
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2004, by and
among the Registrant and Nortel Networks Limited. |
|
|
10-Q |
|
|
|
000-23354 |
|
|
|
08-06-04 |
|
|
|
10.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.14 |
|
Supplemental Contingent Share Award Agreement dated
August 17, 2004 by and between Michael E. Marks and the
Registrant. |
|
|
10-Q |
|
|
|
333-120291 |
|
|
|
11-08-04 |
|
|
|
10.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
.01 |
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
23 |
.01 |
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
24 |
.01 |
|
Power of Attorney (included on the signature page to this
Form 10-K). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
31 |
.01 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
31 |
.02 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
32 |
.01 |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
32 |
.02 |
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement. |