VERITY INC \DE\ - 10-Q Quarterly Report

Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes þ No o

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value, was 36,900,736 as of March 31, 2003.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for Verity, Inc. (the “Company” or “Verity”) as of February 28, 2003 and for the three and nine month periods ended February 28, 2003 and 2002 have been prepared on the same basis as the Company’s audited financial statements and, in the opinion of management, include all material adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Although certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Company believes the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s annual financial statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2002.

Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.

The Company’s balance sheet as of May 31, 2002 was derived from the Company’s audited financial statements, and does not include all disclosures necessary for the presentation to be in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Basic earnings per share are computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are computed using the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive common equivalent shares consist of “in-the-money” stock options. “In-the-money” options are those where the exercise price is lower than the average market price being used to determine the value. Verity’s average market price for the quarter ended February 28, 2003 was $14.74. All common equivalent shares have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share for the nine month period ended February 28, 2002 because the effect would be anti-dilutive.

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share are calculated as follows for the three and nine month periods ended February 28, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands, except per share data):

As of February 28, 2003, available-for-sale securities consist of the following (in thousands):

At February 28, 2003, scheduled maturities of investments classified as available-for-sale are as follows (in thousands):

As of May 31, 2002, available-for-sale securities consist of the following (in thousands):

Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity (net assets) of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. The following are the components of comprehensive income (loss) (in thousands):

The Company has sales and marketing operations located outside the United States in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, South Africa, Mexico and Australia, a joint investment partnership in Brazil and a development and technical support operation in Canada. Foreign branch and subsidiary revenues consist primarily of maintenance and consulting services and are being allocated based on foreign branch and subsidiary location.

Transfers between geographic areas are recorded at amounts generally above cost and in accordance with the rules and regulations of the respective governing tax authorities. Long-lived assets of geographic areas are those assets used in the Company’s operations in each area.

No single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s total revenues for the three and nine month periods ended February 28, 2003 and 2002. Revenues derived from sales to the United States government and its agencies were 10.2% and 5.5% of the Company’s total revenues for the three month periods ended February 28, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and 10.2% and 6.0% of the Company’s total revenues for the nine month periods ended February 28, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

On June 7, 2001, Verity filed a complaint in federal district court in the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, against BroadVision, Inc. (Case No. C01-20501-PVT-ADR). BroadVision is a software company that Verity in the past has licensed to distribute Verity’s copyrighted software known as the Verity Developer Kit (“VDK”). Verity alleges in its complaint that under the terms of the parties’ licenses, BroadVision was authorized to distribute certain limited portions of VDK as an embedded component of specified software applications of BroadVision. Verity further alleges that BroadVision has distributed portions of VDK that it was not authorized to distribute, failed to prevent end users from accessing unlicensed functions and encouraged end users to make use of unlicensed functions of VDK. Verity further alleges that it terminated its license with BroadVision on April 24, 2001 and that BroadVision no longer has any right to distribute any portion of VDK.

Based on the foregoing allegations, Verity has asserted claims against BroadVision for copyright infringement, declaratory relief, unfair competition, interference with economic advantage, breach of contract, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Verity seeks by its complaint, among other things, an injunction to prohibit BroadVision from further distribution of VDK, damages, including statutory damages, according to proof based on BroadVision’s unauthorized distribution of VDK and attorneys’ fees.

contained therein (1) by failing to pay BroadVision referral fees that it claims Verity owes to BroadVision for BroadVision’s efforts in securing the sale of Verity Advanced K-2 Search Modules, and (2) by failing to provide support to BroadVision for VDK after Verity terminated the parties’ license. BroadVision seeks by its counterclaim, among other things, damages according to proof, a declaration that BroadVision has not breached the parties’ license and attorneys’ fees.

Verity answered BroadVision’s counterclaim on July 23, 2001 and denied the material allegations of the counterclaim and asserted various affirmative defenses to BroadVision’s claims. On August 8, 2002, Verity filed a first amended complaint against BroadVision which, among other things, added a claim for contributory copyright infringement against BroadVision based on allegations that BroadVision knowingly facilitated the use by end users of unlicensed functionality of VDK. BroadVision answered Verity’s amended complaint on August 29, 2002 and denied the material allegations of the amended complaint and asserted affirmative defenses to Verity’s claims. BroadVision also reasserted its counterclaim described above. Verity answered the counterclaim on September 23, 2002 and denied the material allegations of the counterclaim and asserted various affirmative defenses to BroadVision’s claims.

The action is currently in the discovery phase. The trial date has been set for July 14, 2003.

The Company intends to defend all of these actions vigorously. However, there can be no assurance that any of the complaints discussed above will be resolved without costly litigation, or in a manner that is not materially adverse to Verity’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. No estimate can be made of the possible loss or possible range of loss, if any, associated with the resolution of these contingencies and accordingly, the Company has not recorded a liability.

On June 20, 2002, Verity announced an extension of the stock repurchase program it initiated on September 12, 2001. The program calls for the repurchase of outstanding shares of Verity’s common stock up to an aggregate value of $50.0 million. Through February 28, 2003, Verity repurchased and retired 3,952,005 shares of its common stock through open market transactions, valued at approximately $48.5 million. Verity repurchased and retired 2,449,805 and 1,038,800 shares, valued at approximately $28.6 million and $12.2 million in the nine month periods ended February 28, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The program will terminate at the end of the current fiscal year ending May 31, 2003 unless extended or shortened by the Board of Directors.

In October 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” SFAS No. 144 supersedes “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of” (SFAS No. 121), however it retains the fundamental provisions of SFAS No. 121 for (1) the recognition and measurement of the impairment of long-lived assets to be held and used and (2) the measurement of long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale. SFAS No. 144 develops a single accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, whether previously held and used or newly acquired assets and consequently amends Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30, “Reporting Results of Operations — Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Division of a Business.” Additionally, SFAS No. 144 expands the scope of discontinued operations to include all components of an entity with operations that (1) can be distinguished from the rest of the entity and (2) will be eliminated from the ongoing operations of the entity in a disposal transaction. SFAS No. 144 is effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning June 1, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In November 2001, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) of the FASB reached a consensus on Issue No. 01-09, “Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer or a Reseller of the Vendor’s Products.” EITF No. 01-09 addresses whether consideration from a vendor to a reseller of the vendor’s products is an adjustment to the selling prices of the vendor’s products and, therefore, should be deducted from revenue when recognized in the vendor’s results of operations, or a cost incurred by the vendor for assets or services received from the reseller and, therefore, should be an expense when recognized in the vendor’s results of operations. EITF No. 01-09 is effective for the Company beginning November 1, 2001. The Company’s adoption of EITF No. 01-09 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” SFAS No. 146 nullifies the guidance of the EITF in EITF Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring).” Under EITF Issue No. 94-3, an entity recognized a liability for an exit cost on the date that the entity committed itself to an exit plan. In SFAS No. 146, the FASB acknowledges that an entity’s commitment to a plan does not, by itself, create a present obligation to other parties that meets the definition of a liability and requires that a liability for a cost that is associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. It also establishes that fair value is the objective for the initial measurement of the liability. SFAS No. 146 will be effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. The Company does not expect an impact on its financial position and results of operations from the adoption of SFAS No. 146.

In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” (“FIN 45”). FIN 45 requires that upon issuance of a guarantee, the guarantor must disclose and recognize a liability for the fair value of the obligation it assumes under that guarantee. The initial recognition and measurement requirement of FIN 45 is effective for guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. As of February 28, 2003, the Company’s guarantees that were issued or modified after December 31, 2002 were not material. The Company’s guarantees issued before December 31, 2002, which would have been disclosed in accordance with the disclosure requirements of FIN 45, were not material.

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure.” SFAS No. 148 amends certain provisions of SFAS No. 123 and is effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. It provides alternative methods of transition for an entity that voluntarily changes to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. SFAS No. 148 also requires the disclosure of the pro forma effects on an entity’s accounting policy with respect to stock-based employee compensation on reported net income and earnings per share in annual and interim financial statements. The Company does not currently intend to adopt the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and will continue to apply the intrinsic-value based method.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN 46”). FIN 46 requires that if an entity has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity, the assets, liabilities and results of activities of the variable interest entity should be included in the consolidated financial statements of the entity. FIN 46 requires that its provisions are effective immediately for all arrangements entered into after January 31, 2003. The Company does not have any variable interest entities.

During each of the nine month periods ended February 28, 2003 and February 28, 2002, the Company executed restructurings designed to reduce costs and to better align expense levels with anticipated revenue levels and ensure conservative spending during the current period of economic uncertainty.

During the quarter ended November 30, 2002, the Company implemented a worldwide restructuring to focus on reducing expenses and improving efficiency due to continued macro-economic and capital spending issues affecting the software industry. In connection with the restructuring, the Company recorded in the quarter ended November 30, 2002, a $1.0 million restructuring charge, of which approximately $0.7 million was related to severance costs associated with the reduction in the worldwide workforce by approximately 50 employees, approximately $0.1 million to legal and other outside services in connection with the restructuring, and approximately $0.2 million to other costs associated with the restructuring. The restructuring impacted operations in the U.S., Canada and the Netherlands and was concentrated in research and development and, to a lesser extent, sales and marketing.

Of the total $1.0 million restructuring charge, approximately $0.2 million remains unpaid at February 28, 2003. The remaining $0.2 million mostly relates to a facilities lease and will be paid out ratably over the remaining life of the lease, which terminates in October 2005.

During the quarter ended November 30, 2001, the Company implemented a worldwide restructuring and recorded a $1.6 million restructuring charge, of which approximately $1.2 million was related to severance costs associated with the reduction in the worldwide workforce by 65 employees, approximately $0.3 million to legal and other outside services in connection with the restructuring and approximately $0.1 million to other costs associated with the restructuring. The restructuring impacted operations in the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Germany, France, the Netherlands, Sweden and South Africa. There is no remaining unpaid amount.

During the quarter ended February 28, 2003, Verity completed the purchase of certain assets and obligations of Inktomi Corporation’s enterprise search software business (“Enterprise”), which management believes qualifies as a business, as defined by the SEC. The purchase augments Verity’s product portfolio in the enterprise search and intellectual capital management markets, bringing Verity a product to address an

additional segment of the market and gain access to Inktomi’s enterprise search customer base of 2,500 companies worldwide, considerably expanding Verity’s installed base of customers.

The total estimated purchase price of the acquisition of Enterprise is as follows (in thousands):

Under the purchase method of accounting, the total estimated purchase price is allocated to Enterprise’s net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based upon their estimated fair value as of the date of completion of the acquisition. The final purchase price is dependent on the actual cash paid and actual direct acquisition costs. Based upon the estimated purchase price and the preliminary independent valuation, the preliminary purchase price allocation, which is subject to change based on Verity’s final analysis, is as follows (in thousands):

The following table presents details of Verity’s total purchased intangible assets (in thousands):

The estimated future amortization expense of purchased intangible assets as of February 28, 2003 is as follows (in thousands):

Verity’s methodology for allocating the purchase price to in-process research and development (“in-process R&D”) is determined through established valuation techniques in the high-technology software industry and expensed upon acquisition because technological feasibility has not been established and no future alternative uses exist. The fair value allocation to in-process research and development was determined by identifying the research projects for which technological feasibility had not been achieved and which had no alternative future use at the acquisition date, assessing the stage and expected date of completion of the research and development effort at the acquisition date, and calculating the net present value of the cash flows expected to result from the successful deployment of the new technology resulting from the in-process research and development effort.

The stages of completion were determined by estimating the costs and time incurred to date relative to the costs and time incurred to develop the in-process technology into a commercially viable technology or product, while considering the relative difficulty of completing the various tasks and obstacles necessary to attain technological feasibility. As of the acquisition date, Enterprise had released Ultraseek 5.0, XML Toolkit 1.0, and the latest version of Quiver to the market. Current development efforts, considered in-process R&D, were focused on Ultraseek 5.1 and XML Toolkit 2.0. There were no development efforts (that meet the criteria of in-process R&D) related to the Quiver product line as of the acquisition date. The estimated stage of completion of both Ultraseek 5.1 and XML toolkit 2.0 was 55% complete. Total in-process R&D expense for the quarter ended February 28, 2003 was $1.2 million.

Of the total purchase price, Verity retained $3.0 million in order to secure Inktomi’s indemnification obligations under the Purchase Agreement. On June 17, 2004, Verity is obligated to pay Inktomi an amount equal to the sum of (i) $3.0 million plus (ii) simple interest thereon calculated from the December 17, 2002 through the date of payment at an annual rate of 1.5%. Verity shall have the right to withhold or deduct from the deferred payment amount any sum that may be owed to it by Inktomi pursuant to Inktomi’s indemnification obligations under the Purchase Agreement. Verity believes the likelihood of such indemnifications is remote.

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the operating results of Enterprise from the date of acquisition. The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the combined results of Verity and Enterprise as if the purchase had occurred on June 1, 2001, after giving effect to certain adjustments, including amortization of identifiable intangible assets and in-process research and development expense. Pro forma results of operations for the periods ended February 28, 2003 do not include any adjustments to the results for the three month period ended February 28, 2003 as the purchase occurred near the beginning of the period. For the three month period ended February 28, 2003, in-process research and development expenses has been removed, as that expense would have occurred in the three month period ended August 31, 2001 had the purchase occurred on June 1, 2001.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes, which appear in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2002. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those discussed below and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, particularly under the heading “— Risk Factors” below.

We offer solutions that help organizations maximize the return on their intellectual capital investment by utilizing our enterprise search, classification and personalization technologies. Our software is used for sharing information within and between enterprises; for facilitating e-commerce sales; and for business-to-business activities on Web-based market exchanges. In addition, our technology serves as a core component of many leading e-business applications.

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our critical accounting policies and estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, bad debts, income taxes and intangible assets. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We record intangible assets when we acquire other companies. The cost of the acquisition is allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired, including intangible assets, with the remaining amount being classified as goodwill. Certain intangible assets such as purchased technology and maintenance agreements are amortized to operating expense over time, while in-process research and development is recorded as a one-time charge on the acquisition date. Under current accounting guidelines that became effective on July 1, 2001, goodwill arising from transactions occurring after July 1, 2001 and any existing goodwill as of February 1, 2002 are not amortized to expense but rather periodically assessed for impairment.

The allocation of the acquisition cost to intangible assets and goodwill therefore has a significant impact on our future operating results. The allocation process requires the extensive use of estimates and assumptions, including estimates of future cash flows expected to be generated by the acquired assets. Further, when impairment indicators are identified with respect to previously recorded intangible assets, the values of the assets are determined using discounted future cash flow techniques, which are based on estimated future operating results. Significant management judgment is required in the forecasting of future operating results which are used in the preparation of projected discounted cash flows and should different conditions prevail, material write downs of net intangible assets and/or goodwill could occur.

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” This standard eliminates the amortization of goodwill and requires goodwill to be reviewed at least annually for impairment, the useful lives of previously recognized intangible assets to be reassessed and the remaining amortization periods to be adjusted accordingly. There can be no assurance that at the time that the review is completed a material impairment charge will not be required and recorded. We are required to perform an initial impairment review of goodwill in fiscal 2003 and an annual impairment review thereafter. We periodically review the estimated

remaining useful lives of our intangible assets. A reduction in our estimate of remaining useful lives, if any, could result in increased amortization expense in future periods.

The following table sets forth the percentage of total revenues represented by items in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periods indicated:

The increase in our total revenues for the three month period ended February 28, 2003, compared with the same period a year ago, was due to a $3.0 million increase in service and other revenues, offset in part by a $0.2 million decrease in software product sales. The increase in our total revenues for the nine month period ended February 28, 2003 was due to a $3.6 million increase in service and other revenues, and a $1.5 million increase in software product sales. See “Software product revenues” and “Service and other revenues” tables below for a further discussion.

Revenues derived from foreign operations consist primarily of maintenance, consulting and training revenues performed outside of the United States and accounted for 14.1% and 11.8% of total revenues for the three month periods ended February 28, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and 15.5% and 13.1% of total revenues for the nine month periods ended February 28, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Our export sales consist primarily of products licensed for delivery outside of the United States. For the three month periods ended February 28, 2003 and 2002, export sales accounted for 23.9% and 22.3% of total revenues, respectively. For the nine month periods ended February 28, 2003 and 2002, export sales accounted for 21.9% and 20.7% of total revenues, respectively.

No single customer accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues for the three and nine month periods ended February 28, 2003 and 2002. Revenues derived from sales to the United States government and its agencies were 10.2% and 5.5% of our total revenues for the three month periods ended February 28, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and 10.2% and 6.0% of our total revenues for the nine month periods ended February 28, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

We continue to operate in a difficult global economic environment and, as a result, we experienced a slight decrease in software product sales in the three month period ended February 28, 2003, compared with the same period a year ago. The decrease was attributable to a decrease in sales of our K2 product application, offset to a large extent by sales resulting from the addition of our Ultraseek product which came from the purchase of assets and obligations of Inktomi Corporation’s enterprise search software business (“Enterprise”) during the quarter. The increase in software product revenues for the nine month period ended February 28, 2003 was principally the result of unusually low sales in the quarter ended August 31, 2001, contributing to the increase in software product revenues for the fiscal 2003 nine month period, despite the decrease in software product revenues for the third quarter ended February 28, 2003. We anticipate that software product revenues will increase next quarter, in part as a result of a having sales of our new Ultraseek product for a full quarter.

Our service and other revenues consist primarily of fees for software maintenance, consulting and training. The increases in service and other revenues for the three and nine month periods ended February 28, 2003, compared with the same periods a year ago, were due to increased sales of consulting services and to increased maintenance revenue which results from maintenance contracts acquired as part of the Enterprise purchase.

Costs of our software products consists primarily of product media, duplication, manuals, packaging materials, shipping expenses, and in certain instances, royalties for licensing of third-party software incorporated in our products. The decreases in costs of software products in absolute dollars and as a percentage of software product revenues for the three and nine month periods ended February 28, 2003, compared with the same periods a year ago, were primarily attributable to decreased costs of third-party software components and to decreased costs for manuals and other shipping expenses from the prior periods which had approximately $0.1 million in total one-time costs associated with the start-up of European distribution operations. We anticipate that costs of third-party software components will continue to constitute a lower percentage of software product revenues as compared with previous periods.

In addition, during fiscal years 2003 and 2002, we did not capitalize any software development costs as these costs were not material.

Costs of service and other revenues consist of costs incurred in providing consulting services, customer training, telephone support and product upgrades to customers. The increase in absolute dollars of costs of service and other revenues for the three month period ended February 28, 2003, compared with the same period a year ago, was due to increased compensation costs due to increased headcount necessary to respond to higher demand for services, in large part resulting from the purchase of Enterprise. The decrease as a

percentage of service and other revenues was related to an increase in service and other revenues and to increased utilization of resources.

The increase in absolute dollars for the nine month period ended February 28, 2003, compared with the same period a year ago, was due to increased compensation and other employee related expenses resulting from a slightly higher average headcount. The higher average headcount results from the addition of personnel necessary to respond to increased demand for services and in connection with the Enterprise purchase in December 2002. This compares with the prior year period in which headcount began at a higher level than at any time during the first two quarters of fiscal year 2003, but was reduced during our staffing reorganization during the quarter ended November 30, 2001. The decrease as a percentage of service and other revenues was related to an increase in service and other revenues.

Research and development expenses consist primarily of employee compensation and benefits, payments to outside contractors, depreciation on equipment used for development and corporate overhead allocations. We anticipate that research and development expenditures will continue to comprise a significant percentage of total revenues because they are essential to maintaining our competitive position. We believe that research and development expenses will increase in absolute dollars, in our quarter ending May 31, 2003, primarily as a result of staffing additions associated the Enterprise purchase, which closed on December 17, 2002. We expect to see increased compensation and other employee related expenses associated with having the additions for the full quarter ending May 31, 2003.

The slight increase in research and development expenses in absolute dollars for the three month period ended February 28, 2003, compared with the same period a year ago, was due to an increase in capital equipment costs associated with our continued investment in development capabilities. The decrease as a percentage of total revenues was the result of the increase in total revenues.

The decrease in research and development expenses in absolute dollars for the nine month period ended February 28, 2003, compared with the same period a year ago, was primarily due to a decrease in compensation and other employee related expenses associated with the reduction in staffing in our research and development organization during each of November 2001 and 2002, offset in part by the addition of personnel in connection with the Enterprise purchase during the quarter ended February 28, 2003. The decrease as a percentage of total revenues was due to the decrease in absolute dollars and the increase in total revenues.

Marketing and sales expenses consist primarily of employee compensation and benefits, tradeshows, marketing and other lead generation activities, public relations, travel expenses associated with our sales staff and corporate overhead allocations. We anticipate that we will continue to make significant investments in marketing and sales with the goal of continuing to align marketing and sales expenses with anticipated revenues. We believe that marketing and sales expenses will increase in absolute dollars, in our quarter ending May 31, 2003, as a result of staffing additions and increased program spending associated with the Enterprise purchase, which closed on December 17, 2002. We expect to see increased compensation and other employee related expenses associated with having the additions for the full quarter ending May 31, 2003.

The decrease in marketing and sales expenses in absolute dollars for the three month period ended February 28, 2003, compared with the same period a year ago, was due to a decrease in compensation and other employee related expenses associated with lower average headcount for the period. The lower average headcount results from the reduction in staffing in our marketing and sales organization during the quarter ended November 30, 2002, offset in part by the addition of personnel in connection with the Enterprise purchase during the quarter ended February 28, 2003. The decrease in marketing and sales expenses as a percentage of total revenues for the three month period ended February 28, 2003 was due to the decrease in absolute costs combined with the increase in total revenues for the period.

The decrease in marketing and sales expenses in absolute dollars for the nine month period ended February 28, 2003, compared with the same period a year ago, was due to a $8.8 million decrease in compensation and other employee related expenses associated with the reduction in staffing in our marketing and sales organization during the quarters ended November 30, 2002 and 2001, offset in part by the addition of personnel in connection with the Enterprise purchase during the quarter ended February 28, 2003, and to a $0.5 million decrease in overall marketing program spending. The decrease in marketing and sales expenses as a percentage of total revenues for the nine month period ended February 28, 2003 was due to the decrease in absolute costs combined with the increase in total revenues for the period.

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel costs for finance, legal, human resources and general management, provisions for doubtful accounts, insurance, fees for external professional advisors and corporate overhead allocations. We expect general and administrative costs to increase modestly in absolute dollars during the next quarter.

The decrease in general and administrative expenses in absolute dollars for the three month period ended February 28, 2003, compared with the same period a year ago, was due to a $0.4 million decrease in expenses for outside professional services, including legal fees, and audit and tax fees and a $0.3 million reduction in bad debt expenses, offset in part by a $0.1 million increase in insurance costs. The decrease as a percentage of total revenues for the three month period ended February 28, 2003 was due to the decrease in absolute costs combined with the increase in total revenues.

The decrease in general and administrative expenses in absolute dollars for the nine month period ended February 28, 2003, compared with the same period a year ago, was due to a $1.1 million decrease in expenses for outside professional services including legal fees, and audit and tax fees and a $0.5 million decrease in bad debt expense and a $0.2 million decrease in other miscellaneous expenses, offset by a $0.3 million increase in insurance costs. The decrease as a percentage of total revenues for the nine month period ended February 28, 2003 was due to the decrease in absolute costs combined with the increase in total revenues.

Total in-process R&D expense of $1.2 million for the three month period ended February 28, 2003 was attributable to the Enterprise purchase. The methodology for allocating the purchase price to in-process R&D is determined through established valuation techniques as outlined in the In-Process R&D Practice Aid published by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc. (“AICPA”). The fair value allocation to in-process research and development was determined, and expensed upon acquisition, by identifying the research projects for which technological feasibility had not been achieved and which had no alternative future use at the acquisition date, assessing the stage and expected date of completion of the research and development effort at the acquisition date, and calculating the net present value of the cash flows (by discounting expected future cash flows to present value) expected to result from the successful deployment of the new technology resulting from the in-process research and development effort. The discount rates used in the present value calculations are typically derived from a weighted-average cost of capital analysis and venture capital surveys, adjusted upward to reflect additional risks inherent in the development life cycle based on each in-process R&D project’s stage of completion. The discount rates for existing technology and in-process R&D were 28% and 33%, respectively.

The development of the acquired in-process R&D remains a significant risk due to the remaining efforts to achieve technical feasibility, rapidly changing customer markets, uncertain standards for new products, and significant competitive threats from several companies. The nature of the efforts to develop these technologies into commercially viable products consists principally of completing the software development relating to the planned new functionalities, and testing activities necessary to determine that the technologies can meet market expectations, including functionality and technical requirements. Failure to bring these products to market in a timely manner could result in a loss of market share or a lost opportunity to capitalize on emerging markets, and could have a material adverse impact on our business and operating results.

The key assumptions underlying the valuations for our purchase acquisition primarily consist of an expected completion date for the in-process projects, estimated costs to complete the projects, revenue and expense projections assuming the products have entered the market, and discount rates based on the risks associated with the stage of completion of the in-process technology acquired.

During the three month period ended February 28, 2003, we amortized $0.6 million of the purchased intangible assets acquired in connection with our Enterprise purchase. We will record quarterly amortization expenses of $0.6 million associated with the purchased intangible assets of Enterprise for a period of 5 years. For additional information regarding purchased intangible assets, see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

During each of November 2001 and 2002, we executed restructurings designed to reduce costs and to better align our expense levels with anticipated revenue levels and ensure conservative spending during the current period of economic uncertainty.

During November 2002, we implemented a worldwide restructuring to focus on reducing expenses and improving efficiency due to continued macro-economic and capital spending issues affecting the software industry. In connection with the restructuring, we recorded in the quarter ended November 30, 2002, a $1.0 million restructuring charge, of which approximately $0.7 million was related to severance costs associated with the reduction in the worldwide workforce by approximately 50 employees, approximately $0.1 million to legal and other outside services in connection with the restructuring, and approximately $0.2 million to other costs associated with the restructuring. The restructuring impacted operations in the U.S., Canada and the Netherlands and was concentrated in research and development and, to a lesser extent, sales and marketing.

Of the total $1.0 million restructuring charge, approximately $0.2 million remains unpaid at February 28, 2003. The remaining $0.2 million relates to a facilities lease and will be paid out ratably over the remaining life of the lease, which terminates in October 2005.

During the quarter ended November 30, 2001, we implemented a worldwide restructuring and recorded a $1.6 million restructuring charge, of which approximately $1.2 million was related to severance costs

associated with the reduction in the worldwide workforce by 65 employees, approximately $0.3 million to legal and other outside services in connection with the restructuring and approximately $0.1 million to other costs associated with the restructuring. The restructuring impacted operations in the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Germany, France, the Netherlands, Sweden and South Africa. There is no remaining unpaid amount.

On September 14, 2001, we made a $1 million donation to help the victims of the September 11th terrorist attacks in New York, Pennsylvania and Washington D.C. Our donation kicked off the United Way Silicon Valley 9/11 Response Fund. The donation provided immediate support to established emergency assistance agencies, such as the American Red Cross and Salvation Army, both of whom are founding members of the United Way, locally and nationally.

Other income consists primarily of interest income and realized gains from our investments in marketable securities and, to a lesser extent, the realized foreign currency translation gain (loss).

The decreases in other income in absolute dollars for the three and nine month periods ended February 28, 2003, compared with the same period a year ago, were primarily due to decreasing overall yields on our portfolio of marketable securities caused by the decreasing interest rate environment, in addition to slightly lower average balances of marketable securities resulting from our repurchases of our common stock. The decrease in other income as a percentage of total revenues for the three and nine month periods ended February 28, 2003 were due to the decreases in absolute dollars combined with the increases in total revenues.

Income tax provision (benefit) includes U.S. and foreign income taxes, as well as the provision for U.S. taxes on undistributed earnings of international subsidiaries. Certain items of income and expense are not reported in tax returns and financial statements in the same year. The tax effect of this difference is reported as deferred income taxes.

We expect the tax savings for fiscal 2003 due to research and development tax credits to result in a marginally lower effective tax rate and accordingly applied an effective tax rate of 38.0% to the results of our quarter ended February 28, 2003. For the same reasons, we also applied an effective tax rate of 38.0% to the results of the nine month period ended February 28, 2003 and the three and nine month periods ended February 28, 2002. We anticipate that the effective tax rate for the quarter and annual periods ending May 31, 2003 will also be 38.0%. We will continue to reassess the impact of our research and development expenses on our effective tax rate in future periods.

As of February 28, 2003, we had $220.6 million in cash and cash equivalents and available-for-sale securities compared to $245.4 million at May 31, 2002. At February 28, 2003, our principal sources of liquidity were our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of $137.2 million. As of February 28, 2003, we had a $3 million deferred purchase payment to Inktomi Corp. in connection with the acquisition of certain assets from Inktomi.

Our cash provided by operating activities increased to $16.6 million for the nine month period ended February 28, 2003, compared to $12.6 million in the prior year period. This $4.0 million increase was primarily due to the increase in net income of $9.5 million, the effect on cash flow of which was further increased by approximately $7.5 million due to greater non-cash expenses in the 2003 period over the prior year period. However, these differences were offset to a large extent by changes in operating assets and liabilities, comprised mostly of a $18.4 million decrease in accounts receivable in the 2002 period compared only to a $2.3 million decrease in the 2003 period, and to a lesser extent by a $4.4 million increased in deferred revenue in the 2002 period compared to $2.1 million increase in the 2003 period.

Cash used in investing activities for the nine month periods ended February 28, 2003 and 2002 was $2.9 million and $8.3 million, respectively, as the result of net sales of marketable securities offset by capital expenditures of $1.2 million and $2.7 million in the respective periods, and for the nine month period ended February 28, 2003, $23.8 million in costs related to the purchase of the Inktomi Enterprise business. For the nine month periods ended February 28, 2003 and 2002, the capital expenditures consisted primarily of purchases for computer hardware and software.

Cash used in financing activities for the nine month period ended February 28, 2003 consisted of $28.6 million in repurchases of our common stock through our stock repurchase program, partially offset by a $12.2 million in proceeds from the sale of common stock as a result of stock option exercises and from the issuance of common stock in connection with our Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Cash provided by financing activities for the nine month period ended February 28, 2002 consisted of $13.3 million in proceeds from the sale of common stock as a result of stock option exercises and from the issuance of common stock in connection with our Employee Stock Purchase Plan partially offset by $12.2 million in repurchases of our common stock through our stock repurchase program.

Our principal commitments as of February 28, 2003, as set forth in the table below consist of obligations under operating leases, totaling $9.3 million over the life of these leases. In addition, we hold $3.0 million as a deferred purchase payment related to Enterprise. On June 17, 2004, we are obligated to pay Inktomi an amount equal to the sum of (i) $3.0 million plus (ii) simple interest thereon calculated from the December 17, 2002 through the date of payment at an annual rate of 1.5%. We shall have the right to withhold or deduct from the deferred payment amount any sum that may be owed to us by Inktomi pursuant to Inktomi’s indemnification obligations under the Purchase Agreement.

On June 20, 2002, we announced an extension of the stock repurchase program we initiated on September 12, 2001. The program calls for the repurchase of outstanding shares of our common stock up to an aggregate value of $50.0 million. Through February 28, 2003, we repurchased and retired 3,952,005 shares of our common stock through open market transactions, valued at approximately $48.5 million. The program will terminate at the end of the current fiscal year ending May 31, 2003 unless extended or shortened by our board of directors.

On December 17, 2002, we completed the purchase of certain assets and obligations of Inktomi Corporation’s enterprise search software business. In addition to the cash commitment in this transaction, we may also incur substantial costs related to the integration of this business. These costs may be incurred in subsequent quarters and may affect our results of operations.

We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents, interest income and cash generated from operations, if any, will provide adequate liquidity to meet our working capital and operating resource expenditure requirements through at least fiscal 2004. If the global economy weakens further, our cash, cash equivalents and investments balances may decline. As a result, or if our spending plans materially change, we may find it necessary to seek to obtain additional sources of financing to support our capital needs, but we cannot assure you that a financing will be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

During the quarter ended February 28, 2003, we extended our current management agreement with Regent Pacific Management Corporation until February 28, 2005, and have an option to further extend the term of this agreement through August 2005. Under the amended agreement, Regent Pacific will continue to provide the services of Gary J. Sbona, the Chief Executive Officer of Regent Pacific, as executive chairman of Verity, and will continue to provide additional Regent Pacific management services to Verity. In accordance with the agreement as originally in effect, Verity pays Regent Pacific $50,000 per week for the management services that Regent Pacific provides to Verity.

In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” SFAS No. 144 supersedes “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of” (SFAS No. 121), however it retains the fundamental provisions of SFAS No. 121 for (1) the recognition and measurement of the impairment of long-lived assets to be held and used and (2) the measurement of long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale. SFAS No. 144 develops a single accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, whether previously held and used or newly acquired assets and consequently amends Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30, “Reporting Results of Operations — Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Division of a Business.” Additionally, SFAS No. 144 expands the scope of discontinued operations to include all components of an entity with operations that (1) can be distinguished from the rest of the entity and (2) will be eliminated from the ongoing operations of the entity in a disposal transaction. SFAS No. 144 is effective for our fiscal year beginning June 1, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.

vendor’s products is an adjustment to the selling prices of the vendor’s products and, therefore, should be deducted from revenue when recognized in the vendor’s results of operations, or a cost incurred by the vendor for assets or services received from the reseller and, therefore, should be an expense when recognized in the vendor’s results of operations. EITF No. 01-09 is effective for us beginning November 1, 2001. The adoption of EITF No. 01-09 did not have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” SFAS No. 146 nullifies the guidance of the EITF in EITF Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring).” Under EITF Issue No. 94-3, an entity recognized a liability for an exit cost on the date that the entity committed itself to an exit plan. In SFAS 146, the FASB acknowledges that an entity’s commitment to a plan does not, by itself, create a present obligation to other parties that meets the definition of a liability and requires that a liability for a cost that is associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. It also establishes that fair value is the objective for the initial measurement of the liability. SFAS 146 will be effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. We do not expect an impact on our financial position and results of operations from the adoption of SFAS 146.

In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” (“FIN 45”). FIN 45 requires that upon issuance of a guarantee, the guarantor must disclose and recognize a liability for the fair value of the obligation it assumes under that guarantee. The initial recognition and measurement requirement of FIN 45 is effective for guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. As of February 28, 2003, our guarantees that were issued or modified after December 31, 2002 were not material. Our guarantees issued before December 31, 2002, which would have been disclosed in accordance with the disclosure requirements of FIN 45, were not material.

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure.” SFAS No. 148 amends certain provisions of SFAS No. 123 and is effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. It provides alternative methods of transition for an entity that voluntarily changes to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. SFAS No. 148 also requires the disclosure of the pro forma effects on an entity’s accounting policy with respect to stock-based employee compensation on reported net income and earnings per share in annual and interim financial statements. We do not currently intend to adopt the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and will continue to apply the intrinsic-value based method.

The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only risks and uncertainties we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, results of operations and financial condition would suffer. In that event, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and our stockholders may lose all or part of their investment in our common stock. The discussion below and elsewhere in this report also includes forward-looking statements, and our actual results may differ substantially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements as a result of the risks discussed below.

We have incurred net losses in the past and, although we reported net income in fiscal year 2002 and the first three quarters of fiscal year 2003, we may not be able to maintain profitability. In the future, our revenues may decline, remain flat, or grow at a rate slower than was experienced in the first two quarters of fiscal year 2002, especially in light of the current economic environment. To achieve revenue growth and maintain fiscal year profitability, we must:


	•	increase market acceptance of our products;

	•	respond effectively to competitive developments;

	•	execute sales despite the recent economic slowdown and resulting decrease in our customers’ capital spending;

	•	attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel; and

	•	upgrade our technologies and commercialize our products and services incorporating these technologies.

We cannot assure you that we will be successful in achieving any of these goals or that we will experience increased revenues, positive cash flows, or achieve long-term profitability.

The results of operations for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in future periods. We expect our stock price to vary with our operating results and, consequently, any adverse fluctuations in our operating results could have an adverse effect on our stock price. Our operating results have in the past been, and will continue to be, subject to quarterly fluctuations as a result of a number of factors. These factors include:


	•	the downturn in capital spending by customers;

	•	the size and timing of orders;

	•	changes in the budget or purchasing patterns of customers or potential customers, changes in foreign country exchange rates, or pricing pressures from competitors;

	•	increased competition in the software and Internet industries;

	•	the introduction and market acceptance of new technologies and standards in search and retrieval, Internet, document management, database, networking, and communications technology;

	•	variations in sales channels, product costs, the mix of products sold, or the success of quality control measures;

	•	the integration of people, operations, and products from acquired businesses and technologies;

	•	changes in operating expenses and personnel;


	•	changes in accounting principals, such as a requirement that stock options be included in compensation, as is currently being considered by Congress and, which if adopted, would increase our compensation expenses and have a negative effect on our earnings;

	•	the overall trend toward industry consolidation; and

	•	changes in general economic and geo-political conditions and specific economic conditions in the computer and software industries.

Any of the factors, some of which are discussed in more detail below, could materially and adversely impact our operations and financial results, and consequently cause our stock price to fall.

Revenues are difficult to forecast because the market for search and retrieval software is uncertain and evolving. Because we generally ship software products within a short period after receipt of an order, we typically do not have a material backlog of unfilled orders, and revenues in any quarter are substantially dependent on orders booked in that quarter. In addition, a portion of our revenues is derived from royalties based upon sales by third-party vendors of products incorporating our technology. These revenues may be subject to extreme fluctuation and are difficult for us to predict. Our expense levels are based, in part, on our expectations as to future revenues and are, to a large extent, fixed in the short term. Therefore, we may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected revenue shortfall. Any significant shortfall of demand in relation to our expectations or any material delay of customer orders would have an almost immediate adverse affect on our operating results and on our ability to achieve profitability.

Adverse economic conditions worldwide have contributed to slowdowns in the software information technology spending environment and may continue to impact our business, resulting in reduced demand for our products as a result of a decrease in capital spending by our customers, increased price competition for our products and higher overhead costs as a percentage of revenues. Decreased demand for our products would result in decreased revenues, which could harm our operating results and cause the price of our common stock to fall.

Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by earnings being lower than anticipated in foreign countries where we have lower statutory rates, changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, or changes in U.S. or foreign tax laws or interpretations thereof.

The size and timing of individual orders may cause our operating results to fluctuate significantly. Our operating results for a quarter could be materially and adversely affected if one or more large orders are either not received or are delayed or deferred by customers. A significant portion of our revenues in recent quarters has been derived from these relatively large sales to a limited number of customers, and we currently anticipate that future quarters will continue to reflect this trend. Sales cycles for these customers can be up to nine months or longer. In addition, customer order deferrals in anticipation of new products may cause our operating results to fluctuate. Like many software companies, we have generally recognized a substantial portion of our revenues in the last month of each quarter, with these revenues concentrated in the last weeks of the quarter. Accordingly, the cancellation or deferral of even a small number of purchases of our products could harm our business in any particular quarter. In addition, to the extent that the significant sales occur earlier than expected, operating results for subsequent quarters may fail to keep pace or even decline.

Any delay in sales of our products and services could cause our quarterly revenue and operating results to fluctuate. The typical sales cycle of our products is lengthy, generally between six to twelve months, unpredictable, and involves significant investment decisions by prospective customers, as well as our education of potential customers regarding the use and benefits of our products. Our customers spend a substantial amount of time before purchasing our products in performing internal reviews and obtaining capital expenditure approvals. We believe our sales cycle lengthened in 2002 and 2003 as a result of macro-economic factors and we cannot be certain that this cycle will not continue to lengthen in the future.

Historically, our foreign operations and export sales account for a significant portion of our annual revenues. Our international business activities are subject to a number of risks, each of which could impose unexpected costs on us that would have an adverse effect on our operating results. These risks include:


	•	difficulties in complying with regulatory requirements and standards;

	•	tariffs and other trade barriers;

	•	costs and risks of localizing products for foreign countries;

	•	reliance on third parties to distribute our products;

	•	longer accounts receivable payment cycles;

	•	potentially adverse tax consequences;

	•	limits on repatriation of earnings; and

	•	burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws.

We currently engage in only limited hedging activities to protect against the risk of currency fluctuations. Fluctuations in currency exchange rates could cause sales denominated in U.S. dollars to become relatively more expensive to customers in a particular country, leading to a reduction in sales or profitability in that country. Also, these fluctuations could cause sales denominated in foreign currencies to affect a reduction in the current U.S. dollar revenues derived from sales in a particular country. Furthermore, future international activity may result in increased foreign currency denominated sales and, in this event, gains and losses on the conversion to U.S. dollars of accounts receivable and accounts payable arising from international operations may contribute significantly to fluctuations in our results of operations. The financial stability of foreign markets could also affect our international sales. In addition, income earned in various countries where we do business may be subject to taxation by more than one jurisdiction, thereby adversely affecting our consolidated after-tax earnings. We cannot assure you that any of these factors will not have an adverse effect on the revenues from our future international sales and, consequently, our results of operations.

Service and other revenues derived from foreign operations accounted for 15.5%, 13.9%, 6.3% and 6.7% of total revenues for the nine month period ended February 28, 2003, and fiscal years 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. Our export sales consist primarily of products licensed for delivery outside of the United States. For the nine month period ended February 28, 2003 and fiscal years 2002, 2001 and 2000, export sales accounted for 21.9%, 21.8%, 26.0% and 19.0% of total revenues, respectively. We expect that revenues derived from foreign operations and export sales will continue to account for a significant percentage of our revenues for the foreseeable future. These revenues may fluctuate significantly as a percentage of revenues from period to period. In addition, a portion of these revenues was derived from sales to foreign government agencies, which may be subject to risks similar to those described immediately below.

Revenues derived from sales to the federal and state governments and their agencies were 10.2%, 6.1%, 7.4% and 7.8% of total revenues for the nine month period ended February 28, 2003 and fiscal years 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Future reductions in government spending on information technologies could harm our operating results. In recent years, budgets of many governments and/or their agencies have been reduced, causing certain customers and potential customers of our products to re-evaluate their needs. These budget reductions are expected to continue over at least the next several years.

Almost all of our government contracts contain termination clauses, which permit contract termination upon our default or at the option of the other contracting party. We cannot assure you a cancellation will not occur in the future, and any termination would adversely affect our operating results.

During the past few years, management and other personnel have focused on modifying and enhancing our core technology to support a broader set of search and retrieval solutions for use on enterprise-wide systems, over online services, over the Internet and on CD-ROM. In order for our strategy to succeed and to remain competitive, we must continue to leverage our core technology to develop new product offerings by us and by our original equipment manufacturer, or OEM, customers that address the needs of these new markets or we must acquire new technology. The development of new products, whether by leveraging our core technology or by acquiring new technology, is expensive. If these new products do not generate substantial revenues, our business and results of operations will be adversely affected. We cannot assure you that any of these new products will be successfully developed and completed on a timely basis or at all, will achieve market acceptance or will generate significant revenues.

Our future operating results will depend upon our ability to increase the installed base of our information retrieval technology and to generate significant product revenues from our core products. Our future operating results will also depend upon our ability to successfully market our technology to online and Internet publishers who use this technology to index their published information in our format. To the extent that customers do not adopt our technology for indexing their published information, it will limit the demand for our products.

The computer software industry is subject to rapid technological change, changing customer requirements, frequent new product introductions, and evolving industry standards that may render existing products and services obsolete. As a result, our position in our existing markets or other markets that we may enter could be eroded rapidly by any of these factors, including product advancements by competitors. If we are unable to develop and introduce products in a timely manner in response to changing market conditions or customer requirements, our financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

The life cycles of our products are difficult to estimate. Our future success will depend upon our ability to keep pace with technological developments, conform to evolving industry standards, particularly client/ server and Internet communication and security protocols, as well as publishing formats such as HTML and XML, and address increasingly sophisticated customer needs. We cannot assure you that we will not experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the successful development, introduction and marketing of new products, or that new products and product enhancements will meet the requirements of the marketplace and achieve market acceptance.

We strive to achieve compatibility between our products and the text publication formats we believe are or will become popular and widely adopted. We invest substantial resources in development efforts aimed at achieving compatibility. Any failure by us to anticipate or respond adequately to technology or market

developments could result in a loss of competitiveness or revenue. For instance, to date we have focused our efforts on integration with the Adobe PDF and Lotus Notes environments and, more recently, the Microsoft Exchange environment. Should any of these products or technologies lose or fail to achieve acceptance in the marketplace or be replaced by other products or technologies, our business could be materially and adversely affected.

We embed our basic search engine in key OEM application products and, therefore, our sales of information retrieval products depend on our ability to maintain compatibility with these OEM applications. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain compatibility with these vendors’ products or continue to be the search technology of choice for OEMs. The failure to maintain compatibility with or be selected by OEMs would materially and adversely affect our sales. Further, the failure of the products of our key OEM partners to achieve market acceptance could harm our results of operations.

Our complex software products may contain errors that may be detected at any point in the products’ life cycles. We have in the past discovered software errors in some of our products and have experienced delays in shipment of products during the periods required to correct these errors. We cannot assure you that, despite our testing and quality assurance efforts and similar efforts by current and potential customers, errors will not be found. The discovery of an error may result in loss of or delay in market acceptance and sales, diversion of development resources, injury to our reputation, or increased service and warranty costs, any of which could harm our business. Although we generally attempt by contract to limit our exposure to incidental and consequential damages, and to cap our liabilities to our proceeds under the contract, if a court fails to enforce the liability limiting provisions of our contracts for any reason, or if liabilities arise which are not effectively limited, our operating results could be harmed.

Some of the technology used by our products is licensed from third parties, generally on a nonexclusive basis. We believe that there are alternative sources for each of the material components of technology we license from third parties. However, the termination of any of these licenses, or the failure of the third-party licensors to adequately maintain or update their products, could result in delay in our ability to ship these products while we seek to implement technology offered by alternative sources. Any required replacement licenses could prove costly. Also, any delay, to the extent it becomes extended or occurs at or near the end of a fiscal quarter, could harm our quarterly results of operations. While it may be necessary or desirable in the future to obtain other licenses relating to one or more of our products or relating to current or future technologies, we cannot assure you that we will be able to do so on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

We rely on a combination of patent, trade secrets, copyright and trademark laws, nondisclosure agreements and other contractual provisions and technical measures to protect our intellectual property rights. The source code for our proprietary software is protected both as a trade secret and as a copyrighted work. Policing unauthorized use of our products, however, is difficult. Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets, to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others, or to defend against claims of infringement or invalidity. Litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could harm our business regardless of the outcome of the litigation.

Effective copyright and trade secret protection may be unavailable or limited in some foreign countries. To license our products, we frequently rely on “shrink wrap” licenses that are not signed by the end user and, therefore, may be unenforceable under the laws of several jurisdictions. In addition, employees, consultants

and others who participate in the development of our products may breach their agreements with us regarding our intellectual property, and we may not have adequate remedies for any such breach. We also realize that our trade secrets may become known through other means not currently foreseen by us. Notwithstanding our efforts to protect our intellectual property, our competitors may be able to develop products that are equal to or superior to our products without infringing on any of our intellectual property rights.

Third parties may assert that our products infringe their proprietary rights, or may assert claims for indemnification resulting from infringement claims against us. Any such claims may cause us to delay or cancel shipment of our products, which could harm our business. In addition, irrespective of the validity or the successful assertion of claims, we could incur significant costs in defending against claims. To date, no third party has asserted such claims.

In the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against companies following a decline in the market price of their securities. For example, in December 1999 our stock price dramatically declined and a number of lawsuits were filed against us. Because we expect our stock price to continue to fluctuate significantly, we may be the target of similar litigation in the future. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources, and could seriously harm our business.

We believe that hiring and retaining qualified individuals at all levels is essential to our success, and we cannot assure you that we will be successful in attracting and retaining the necessary personnel. In addition, we are highly dependent on our direct sales force for sales of our products as we have limited distribution channels. Continuity of technical personnel is an important factor in the successful completion of development projects, and any turnover of our research and development personnel could harm our development and marketing efforts.

Our future success also depends on our continuing ability to identify, hire, train and retain other highly qualified sales, technical and managerial personnel. Competition for this type of personnel is intense, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to attract, assimilate or retain other highly qualified technical and managerial personnel in the future. The inability to attract, hire or retain the necessary sales, technical and managerial personnel could harm our business.

Regent Pacific Management Corporation, a management firm of which Gary J. Sbona, our executive chairman of the board, is chief executive officer, provides management services for us under a management services agreement. The management services provided under our agreement with Regent Pacific include the services of Regent Pacific personnel as part of Verity’s management team. The agreement terminates on February 28, 2005, but provides us with an option to further extend the term of this agreement through August 2005. If we exercise this option, the agreement will terminate after August 2005 unless Regent Pacific and the board agree to further extend it. Verity may discharge Regent Pacific at any time after February 28, 2004 provided that Verity has delivered a 60-day written notice of intent to cancel this agreement. If the agreement with Regent Pacific were canceled or not renewed, the loss of the Regent Pacific personnel could negatively affect our operations, especially during the transition phase to a new management. Similarly, if any adverse change in Verity’s relationship with Regent Pacific occurs, it could hinder management’s ability to direct our business and materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.


	We face intense competition from companies with significantly greater financial, technical, and marketing resources, which could adversely affect our ability to maintain or increase sales of our products

The information retrieval, classification and recommendation software markets are intensely competitive and we cannot assure you that we will maintain our current position or market share. A number of companies offer competitive products addressing these markets. We compete with Autonomy, Convera, Endeca, FAST, Google and Microsoft, among others. We also compete indirectly with database vendors, such as Oracle, portal vendors, such as Plumtree, and content management system vendors, such as Interwoven, that offer information search and retrieval capabilities with their core products.

In the future, we may encounter competition from a number of companies. Many of our existing competitors, as well as a number of other potential new competitors, have significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. Because the success of our strategy is dependent in part on the success of our strategic customers, competition between our strategic customers and the strategic customers of our competitors, or failure of our strategic customers to achieve or maintain market acceptance could harm our competitive position. Although we believe that our products and technologies compete favorably with competitive products, we cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully against our current or future competitors or that competition will not harm our business.


	*Our recent acquisition of the Inktomi enterprise search software assets and other potential acquisitions may have unexpected consequences or impose additional costs on us*

Our business is highly competitive and our growth is dependent upon market growth and our ability to enhance our existing products and introduce new products on a timely basis. One of the ways we may address the need to develop new products is through acquisitions of complementary businesses and technologies, such as our acquisition of Inktomi’s enterprise search software assets. From time to time, we consider and evaluate potential business combinations both involving our acquisition of another company and transactions involving the sale of Verity through, among other things, a possible merger or consolidation of our business into that of another entity. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including the following:


	•	difficulties in integration of the operations, technologies, products and personnel of the acquired companies;

	•	the risk of diverting management’s attention from normal daily operations of the business;

	•	accounting consequences, including changes in purchased research and development expenses, resulting in variability in our quarterly earnings;

	•	potential difficulties in completing projects associated with purchased in-process research and development;

	•	risks of entering markets in which we have no or limited direct prior experience and where competitors in these markets have stronger market positions;

	•	the potential loss of key employees of the acquired company;

	•	the assumption of known and potentially unknown liabilities of the acquired company;

	•	we may find that the acquired company or assets do not further our business strategy or that we paid more than what the company or assets are worth;

	•	we may have product liability associated with the sale of the acquired company’s products;

	•	we may have difficulty maintaining uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies;

	•	our relationship with current and new employees and clients could be impaired;

	•	the acquisition may result in litigation from terminated employees or third parties who believe a claim against us would be valuable to pursue;


	•	our due diligence process may fail to identify significant issues with product quality, product architecture and legal contingencies, among other matters; and

	•	insufficient revenues to offset increased expenses associated with acquisitions.


	•	issue common stock that would dilute our current stockholders’ percentage ownership;

	•	record goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets that will be subject to impairment testing and potential periodic impairment charges;

	•	incur amortization expenses related to certain intangible assets; or

	•	incur large and immediate write-offs.

We cannot assure you that our acquisition of Inktomi’s enterprise search software assets and future acquisitions will be successful and will not adversely affect our business. We must also maintain our ability to manage any growth effectively. Failure to manage growth effectively and successfully integrate acquisitions we make could harm our business.


	We depend on increasing use of the Internet, intranets, extranets and portals and on the growth of electronic commerce. If the use of the Internet, intranets, extranets and portals and electronic commerce do not grow as anticipated, our business will be seriously harmed

The products of most of our customers depend on the increased acceptance and use of the Internet as a medium of commerce and on the development of corporate intranets, extranets and portals. As a result, acceptance and use may not continue to develop at historical rates and a sufficiently broad base of business customers may not adopt or continue to use the Internet as a medium of commerce. The lack of such development would impair demand for our products and would adversely affect our ability to sell our products. Demand and market acceptance for recently introduced services and products over the Internet and the development of corporate intranets, extranets and portals are subject to a high level of uncertainty, and there exist few proven services and products.


	•	use of the Internet, the Web and other online services does not continue to increase or increases more slowly than expected;

	•	the infrastructure for the Internet, the Web and other online services does not effectively support expansion that may occur; or

	•	the Internet, the Web and other online services do not create a viable commercial marketplace, inhibiting the development of electronic commerce and reducing the need for our products and services.


	*Capacity constraints may restrict the use of the Internet as a commercial marketplace, which would restrict our growth*

The Internet may not be accepted as a viable long-term commercial marketplace for a number of reasons. These include:


	•	potentially inadequate development of the necessary communication and network infrastructure, particularly if rapid growth of the Internet continues;

	•	delayed development of enabling technologies and performance improvements;

	•	delayed development or adoption of new standards and protocols; and

	•	increased governmental regulation.

Our ability to grow our business is dependent on the growth of the Internet and, consequently, any adverse events would impair our ability to grow our business.

Security risks and concerns may deter the use of the Internet for conducting electronic commerce, which would adversely affect the demand for our products

A significant barrier to electronic commerce and communications is the secure transmission of confidential information over public networks. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other events or developments could result in compromises or breaches of our security systems or those of other web sites to protect proprietary information. If any well-publicized compromises of security were to occur, it could have the effect of substantially reducing the use of the Internet for commerce and communications, resulting in reduced demand for our products, thus adversely affecting our revenues.

Anyone who circumvents our security measures could misappropriate proprietary information or cause interruptions in our services or operations. The Internet is a public network, and data is sent over this network from many sources. In the past, computer viruses, software programs that disable or impair computers, have been distributed and have rapidly spread over the Internet. We may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against the threat of security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by breaches. To the extent that our activities may involve the storage and transmission of proprietary information, such as credit card numbers, security breaches could expose us to a risk of loss or litigation and possible liability. Our security measures may be inadequate to prevent security breaches, and our business would be harmed if we do not prevent them.

The market price of our common stock will fluctuate and you may lose all or part of your investment

Our common stock is quoted for trading on the Nasdaq National Market. The market price for our common stock may continue to be highly volatile for a number of reasons including:


	•	future announcements concerning us or our competitors;

	•	quarterly variations in operating results;

	•	announcements of technological innovations;

	•	the introduction of new products or changes in product pricing policies by us or our competitors;

	•	announcements of acquisitions by us or competitors;

	•	litigation involving proprietary rights or other matters; and

	•	changes in earnings estimates by analysts or other factors.

In addition, stock prices for many technology companies fluctuate widely for reasons, which may be unrelated to operating results. These fluctuations, as well as general economic, market and political conditions such as recessions, terrorist attacks or military conflicts, may materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

We have implemented certain anti-takeover provisions that may prevent or delay an acquisition of Verity that might be beneficial to our stockholders

Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law, could make it more difficult for a third-party to acquire us, even if doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders. These provisions include:


	•	establishment of a classified board of directors such that not all members of the board may be elected at one time;


	•	the ability of the board of directors to issue, without stockholder approval, up to 1,999,995 shares of preferred stock to increase the number of outstanding shares and thwart a takeover attempt;

	•	no provision for cumulative voting in the election of directors, which would otherwise allow less than a majority of stockholders to elect director candidates;

	•	limitations on who may call special meetings of stockholders;

	•	prohibiting stockholder action by written consent, thereby requiring all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders; and

	•	advance notice requirements for nominations for election to the board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings.

We also have in place a Share Purchase Rights Plan, commonly referred to as a “poison pill.” In addition, the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporations Law and the terms of our stock option plan may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of Verity.

Interest Rate Risk. The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve the principal while at the same time maximizing yields without significantly increasing the risk. To achieve this objective, we maintain our portfolio of cash equivalents and investments in a variety of securities, including both government and corporate obligations and money market funds. As of February 28, 2003, approximately 62% of our portfolio matures in one year or less, with the remainder maturing in less than three years. We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. We place our investments with high credit quality issuers and, by policy, limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. The only material market risk to which these instruments are subject is interest rate risk. None of our investments are entered into for trading purposes.

The following table presents the amounts of our cash equivalents and investments that are subject to interest rate risk by year of expected maturity and average interest rates as of February 28, 2003:

Foreign Currency Risk. We transact business in various foreign currencies, including the Euro, the British pound, the Canadian dollar, the Australian dollar, the Swedish krona, the South African rand, the Mexican peso, the Brazilian real and the Singaporean dollar. We have established a foreign currency hedging program utilizing foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge certain sales contracts and payables denominated in foreign currency. Under this program, fluctuations in foreign currencies during the period from the signing of the contract until payment are partially offset by realized gains and losses on the hedging instruments. The goal of this hedging program is to lock in exchange rates on certain sales contracts and payables denominated in foreign currencies. The notional amount of hedged contracts and the estimated fair value are not material.

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of Verity’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-14(c) and 15-d-14(c)) as of a date within 90 days before the

filing date of this quarterly report, have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Verity in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) is accumulated and communicated to Verity’s management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and (ii) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

(b) Changes in internal controls. There were no significant changes in our internal controls or to our knowledge in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation. There were no significant deficiencies or material weaknesses, and therefore there were no corrective actions taken.

It should be noted that a control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and we cannot assure investors that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

BroadVision answered Verity’s complaint on June 28, 2001 and denied the material allegations of the complaint and asserted affirmative defenses to Verity’s claims. BroadVision also asserted a counterclaim alleging that Verity had breached the parties’ license and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing contained therein (1) by failing to pay BroadVision referral fees that it claims Verity owes to BroadVision for BroadVision’s efforts in securing the sale of Verity Advanced K-2 Search Modules; and (2) by failing to provide support to BroadVision for VDK after Verity terminated the parties’ license. BroadVision seeks by its counterclaim, among other things, damages according to proof, a declaration that BroadVision has not breached the parties’ license and attorneys’ fees.

copyright infringement against BroadVision based on allegations that BroadVision knowingly facilitated the use by end users of unlicensed functionality of VDK. BroadVision answered Verity’s amended complaint on August 29, 2002 and denied the material allegations of the amended complaint and asserted affirmative defenses to Verity’s claims. BroadVision also reasserted its counterclaim described above. Verity answered the counterclaim on September 23, 2002 and denied the material allegations of the counterclaim and asserted various affirmative defenses to BroadVision’s claims.

The action is currently in the discovery phase. The trial date has been set for July 14, 2003.

Consistent with Section 10A(i)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as added by Section 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Company is responsible for listing the non-audit services approved by the Company’s Audit Committee to be performed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the company’s external auditor. Non-audit services are defined as services other than those provided in connection with an audit or a review of the financial statements of the Company. Following the quarterly period covered by this filing, the Audit Committee approved no new or recurring engagements of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. The Company has previously approved for fiscal 2003 the following non-audit services: (1) tax compliance services; (2) tax consulting services; and (3) financial due diligence in connection with potential mergers or acquisitions.

We filed one report on Form 8-K and one report on Form 8-K/ A during the quarter covered by this report.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	By:	/s/ STEVEN R. SPRINGSTEEL



	Steven R. Springsteel
	Senior Vice President of Finance and
	Administration and Chief Financial Officer


	1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Verity, Inc.;

	2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

	3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

	4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


	a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

	b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

	c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


	5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):


	a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

	b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and


	6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


	/s/ ANTHONY J. BETTENCOURT, III.

	Anthony J. Bettencourt, III.
	President and Chief Executive Officer


	1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Verity, Inc.;

	2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

	3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

	4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


	a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

	b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

	c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


	5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):


	a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

	b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and


	6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


	/s/ STEVEN R. SPRINGSTEEL

	Steven R. Springsteel
	Senior Vice President of Finance and
	Administration and Chief Financial Officer


(1)	Incorporated by reference from the exhibits with corresponding numbers from the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 20, 2002.

(2)	Incorporated by reference from the exhibits with corresponding numbers from the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2000.


(Mark One)

þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

		For the quarterly period ended February 28, 2003

OR

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

		For the transition period from to


Delaware		77-0182779
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1. Financial Statements
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
	Item 4. Controls and Procedures
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1. Legal Proceedings
	Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
	Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
	Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
	Item 5. Other Information
	Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURE
CERTIFICATION
EXHIBIT 10.3
EXHIBIT 10.6
EXHIBIT 10.7
EXHIBIT 10.41
EXHIBIT 10.42
EXHIBIT 99.1


		Page

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)		2
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets — As of February 28, 2003 and May 31, 2002		2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations — For the Three Months Ended February 28, 2003 and February 28, 2002, and the Nine Months Ended February 28, 2003 and February 28, 2002		3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — For the Nine Months Ended February 28, 2003 and February 28, 2002		4
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		13
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		34
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		34
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		35
Item 2.	Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds		36
Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities		36
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		36
Item 5.	Other Information		36
Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K		36
Signature			37
Certifications			38


			February 28,		May 31,
			2003		2002

ASSETS
Current assets:
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	21,418	$	23,251
	Short-term investments			115,779		130,672
	Trade accounts receivable, net			21,562		20,961
	Deferred tax assets			8,361		3,114
	Prepaid and other			4,259		5,497

		Total current assets		171,379		183,495
Property and equipment, net				5,389		6,625
Long-term investments				83,379		91,433
Deferred tax assets				8,210		16,597
Goodwill				15,534		—
Purchased intangible assets, net				12,255		—

		Total assets	$	296,146	$	298,150

LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
	Accounts payable		$	5,212	$	5,749
	Accrued compensation			9,092		10,376
	Other accrued liabilities			3,335		2,779
	Deferred revenue			18,143		14,981

		Total current liabilities		35,782		33,885

Other non-current liabilities:
	Deferred purchase payment			3,000		—

		Total liabilities		38,782		33,885


Contingencies (Note 6)
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock, $0.001 par value:
	Authorized: 200,000 shares
	Issued and outstanding: 34,819 shares as of February 28, 2003; and 35,775 shares as of May 31, 2002.			35		36
Additional paid-in capital				233,781		250,133
Retained earnings				19,535		12,133
Other comprehensive income				4,013		1,963

		Total stockholders’ equity		257,364		264,265

		Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	296,146	$	298,150



			Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
			February 28,				February 28,

			2003		2002		2003		2002

Revenues:
	Software products		$	15,722	$	15,968	$	40,977	$	39,509
	Service and other			12,122		9,077		31,768		28,201

		Total revenues		27,844		25,045		72,745		67,710

Costs of revenues:
	Software products			243		659		895		1,845
	Service and other			3,041		2,606		8,487		8,409

		Total costs of revenues		3,284		3,265		9,382		10,254

Gross profit				24,560		21,780		63,363		57,456

Operating expenses:
	Research and development			5,912		5,819		17,020		17,710
	Marketing and sales			10,117		11,461		29,621		39,455
	General and administrative			2,376		3,052		7,342		8,793
	In-process research and development			1,200		—		1,200		—
	Amortization of purchased intangible assets			645		—		645		—
	Restructuring charge			—		—		993		1,563
	Charitable contribution			—		—		—		1,000

		Total operating expenses		20,250		20,332		56,821		68,521

Income (loss) from operations				4,310		1,448		6,542		(11,065	)
Other income, net				1,590		2,255		5,398		7,754

Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes				5,900		3,703		11,940		(3,311	)
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes				2,242		1,407		4,538		(1,258	)

Net income (loss)			$	3,658	$	2,296	$	7,402	$	(2,053	)

Net income (loss) per share — basic			$	0.11	$	0.06	$	0.21	$	(0.06	)

Net income (loss) per share — diluted			$	0.10	$	0.06	$	0.20	$	(0.06	)

Number of shares — basic				34,739		35,378		34,995		35,300

Number of shares — diluted				37,883		38,277		36,765		35,300


2.	Computation of Net Income (Loss) and Net Income (Loss) Per Share


				Gross
		Amortized		Unrealized		Fair
		Cost		Gains		Value

Corporate commercial paper — short-term		$	114,647	$	1,132	$	115,779
Corporate commercial paper — long-term			82,673		706		83,379

	Total investments	$	197,320	$	1,838	$	199,158


Within one year	$	115,779
After one year through three years		83,379

	$	199,158



	Three Months						Nine Months
	Ended						Ended
	February 28,						February 28,

	2003			2002			2003		2002

Net income (loss)	$	3,658		$	2,296		$	7,402	$	(2,053	)
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)		842			(325	)		1,729		(456	)
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments, net		(187	)		(552	)		321		1,125

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	4,313		$	1,419		$	9,452	$	(1,384	)



		Nine Month Periods Ended

		February 28,		February 28,
		2003		2002


		(In thousands)
Restructuring charges:
Severance costs		$	719	$	1,216
Legal and other outside services costs			101		273
Other charges			173		74

	Total restructuring charges	$	993	$	1,563


		Workforce			Legal and Other
		Reduction			Outside Services			Other			Total


		(In thousands)
Restructuring provision		$	719		$	101		$	173		$	993
Cash payments			(717	)		(59	)		(1	)		(777	)

	Balance at February 28, 2003	$	2		$	42		$	172		$	216


Cash		$	22,000
Deferred payment			3,000
Estimated acquisition costs			1,826

	Total purchase price	$	26,826


Identifiable intangible assets acquired (Useful life (years))
	Existing technology(5)			$	8,300
	Patents/core technology(5)				2,800
	Maintenance agreements(5)				1,800

		Total amortizable intangible assets			12,900
		In-process technology			1,200
		Fair value of net liabilities assumed			(2,808	)
		Goodwill			15,534

			Total purchase price (including transaction costs)	$	26,826


			Accumulated
February 28, 2003	Gross		Amortization		Net

Existing technology	$	8,300	$	415	$	7,885
Patents/core technology		2,800		140		2,660
Maintenance agreements		1,800		90		1,710

Purchased intangible assets, net	$	12,900	$	645	$	12,255


Item 1.	*Financial Statements*


1.	Interim Financial Data (Unaudited)


3.	Investments


5.	Business Segments


Fiscal Year	Amount

2003 (remaining 3 months)	$	645
2004		2,580
2005		2,580
2006		2,580
2007		2,580
2008		1,290

Total	$	12,255



	Payments Due by Period

			Less than						After
	Total		1 year		1-3 years		4-5 years		5 years
Contractual Obligations

	($ in millions)
Operating Leases	$	9.3	$	2.8	$	3.8	$	1.0	$	1.7
Deferred Purchase Payment		3.1		0.0		3.1		0.0		0.0

Total Contractual Cash Obligations	$	12.4	$	2.8	$	6.9	$	1.0	$	1.7


	*We have sustained quarterly and annual losses in the past and may not be able to maintain profitability*


	*Our revenues and operating results may fluctuate in future periods, which could adversely affect our stock price*


	*Our expenditures are tied to anticipated revenues, and therefore imprecise forecasts may result in poor operating results*


	*Demand for our products may be adversely affected if unfavorable economic and market conditions do not improve or continue to decline*


	*Changes in effective tax rates could affect our results*


	*The size and timing of large orders may materially affect our quarterly operating results*


	*Our business may suffer due to risks associated with international sales*


	A portion of our revenues is derived from sales to the federal government, which are subject to budget cuts and, consequently, the potential loss of revenues upon which we have historically relied


	*We must successfully introduce new products or our customers will purchase our competitors products*


	*If we are unable to enhance our existing products to conform to evolving industry standards in our rapidly changing markets, our products may become obsolete*


	*Our software products are complex and may contain errors that could damage our reputation and decrease sales*


	*We are dependent on proprietary technologies licensed from third parties, the loss of which could delay shipments of products incorporating these technologies and could be costly*


	*Our ability to compete successfully will depend, in part, on our ability to protect our intellectual property rights, which we may not be able to protect*


	*Our products employ technology that may infringe on the proprietary rights of third parties, which may expose us to litigation*


	*We have been sued in the past and are at risk of future securities class action litigation, due to our past and expected stock price volatility*


	*If we lose key personnel, or are unable to attract additional qualified personnel, our ability to conduct and grow our business will be impaired*


	*We rely on Regent Pacific Management Corporation for the management of Verity, and the loss of these services could adversely affect our business*


Item 3.	*Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk*