SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X] | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. | |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 |
OR
[ ] | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the transition period from __________ to __________ |
Commission File Number 0-19371
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
77-0187280 (IRS Employer Identification Number) |
|
4600 Beach Street Haltom City, Texas (Address of principal executive offices) |
76137 (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (817) 605-5300
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such report(s), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
As of October 31, 2002, the registrant had outstanding 5,852,593 shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value.
PHARMCHEM, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
INDEX
Page | ||||||||
Part I. |
Financial Information |
|||||||
Item 1. |
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
3 | ||||||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) at
September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 |
4 | |||||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the
Three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 |
5 | |||||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(unaudited) for the Three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 |
6 | |||||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
for the Nine Months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 |
7 | |||||||
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) |
8 | |||||||
Item 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations |
12 | ||||||
Item 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
18 | ||||||
Item 4. |
Controls and Procedures |
18 | ||||||
Part II. |
Other Information |
|||||||
Item 5. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
19 | ||||||
Item 6. |
Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
19 | ||||||
Signature | 20 |
PART I. Financial Information
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in complete financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. It is suggested that the condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2001 included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K.
These financial statements have been prepared in all material respects in conformity with the standards of accounting measurements set forth in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, and the rules and regulations as specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission and reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to summarize fairly our consolidated financial position and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results of operations for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
3
PHARMCHEM, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except par value)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||
2002 | 2001 | |||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 4,155 | $ | 197 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
500 | | ||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
4,146 | 5,378 | ||||||||
Inventory |
1,311 | 2,160 | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses |
441 | 538 | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 390 | ||||||||
Net current assets of discontinued operations |
| 526 | ||||||||
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS |
10,553 | 9,189 | ||||||||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net |
12,400 | 12,915 | ||||||||
OTHER ASSETS |
39 | 763 | ||||||||
GOODWILL, net |
729 | 729 | ||||||||
NET NONCURRENT ASSETS OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
| 1,613 | ||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 23,721 | $ | 25,209 | ||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||||
Revolving line of credit |
$ | 3,681 | $ | 4,544 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
2,422 | 2,668 | ||||||||
Accounts payable |
3,046 | 5,935 | ||||||||
Accrued compensation |
691 | 635 | ||||||||
Accrued collectors and other liabilities |
2,512 | 1,659 | ||||||||
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES |
12,352 | 15,441 | ||||||||
LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current portion |
1,059 | 3,030 | ||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
13,411 | 18,471 | ||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
||||||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 25,000 shares authorized,
5,853 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2002 and
December 31, 2001 |
6 | 6 | ||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
19,589 | 19,589 | ||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
| (279 | ) | |||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(9,285 | ) | (12,578 | ) | ||||||
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
10,310 | 6,738 | ||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 23,721 | $ | 25,209 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
PHARMCHEM, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||||
NET SALES |
$ | 7,316 | $ | 9,824 | $ | 22,858 | $ | 28,488 | |||||||||||
COST OF SALES |
5,790 | 8,935 | 17,707 | 25,863 | |||||||||||||||
GROSS PROFIT |
1,526 | 889 | 5,151 | 2,625 | |||||||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
2,193 | 2,699 | 6,139 | 9,938 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of goodwill |
| 33 | | 97 | |||||||||||||||
Restructuring charge |
| | | 1,029 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
2,193 | 2,732 | 6,139 | 11,064 | |||||||||||||||
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS |
(667 | ) | (1,843 | ) | (988 | ) | (8,439 | ) | |||||||||||
Interest expense |
167 | 124 | 506 | 279 | |||||||||||||||
Other income |
(9 | ) | (9 | ) | (82 | ) | (26 | ) | |||||||||||
158 | 115 | 424 | 253 | ||||||||||||||||
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
(825 | ) | (1,958 | ) | (1,412 | ) | (8,692 | ) | |||||||||||
BENEFIT FROM INCOME TAXES |
| (41 | ) | (69 | ) | (41 | ) | ||||||||||||
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
(825 | ) | (1,917 | ) | (1,343 | ) | (8,651 | ) | |||||||||||
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of applicable
income taxes of $115 for the three months ended
September
30, 2001, and $184 and $365 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively |
| 245 | 359 | 722 | |||||||||||||||
Gain on disposition, net of applicable income taxes of
$1,116 |
| | 4,277 | | |||||||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ | (825 | ) | $ | (1,672 | ) | $ | 3,293 | $ | (7,929 | ) | ||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE: |
|||||||||||||||||||
BASIC: | Continuing operations | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.33 | ) | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (1.48 | ) | ||||||
Discontinued operations | | 0.04 | 0.79 | 0.12 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.29 | ) | $ | 0.56 | $ | (1.36 | ) | ||||||||
DILUTED: | Continuing operations | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.33 | ) | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (1.48 | ) | ||||||
Discontinued operations |
| 0.04 | 0.79 | 0.12 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.29 | ) | $ | 0.56 | $ | (1.36 | ) | ||||||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING: |
|||||||||||||||||||
BASIC |
5,853 | 5,853 | 5,853 | 5,850 | |||||||||||||||
DILUTED |
5,853 | 5,853 | 5,853 | 5,850 | |||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
PHARMCHEM, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ | (825 | ) | $ | (1,672 | ) | $ | 3,293 | $ | (7,929 | ) | ||||||
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS): |
|||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
| 57 | (53 | ) | (30 | ) | |||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for realized foreign
currency exchange loss included in net income |
| | 332 | | |||||||||||||
| 57 | 279 | (30 | ) | |||||||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) |
$ | (825 | ) | $ | (1,615 | ) | $ | 3,572 | $ | (7,959 | ) | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
PHARMCHEM, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 3,293 | $ | (7,929 | ) | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
(359 | ) | (722 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,698 | 1,492 | ||||||||||
Amortization of discount on subordinated debt |
130 | 3 | ||||||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
95 | 27 | ||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| (4 | ) | |||||||||
Gain on sale of disposition of subsidiary, net of tax |
(4,277 | ) | | |||||||||
Restructuring charge |
| 471 | ||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
1,137 | 485 | ||||||||||
Inventory |
849 | (811 | ) | |||||||||
Prepaids and other current assets |
97 | 27 | ||||||||||
Other assets |
34 | 40 | ||||||||||
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities |
(1,981 | ) | 2,962 | |||||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
| (44 | ) | |||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing
operations |
716 | (4,003 | ) | |||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities of discontinued operations |
161 | 663 | ||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(1,183 | ) | (4,471 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations |
10,000 | | ||||||||||
Increase in restricted cash |
(500 | ) | | |||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing
operations |
8,317 | (4,471 | ) | |||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations |
(40 | ) | (73 | ) | ||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||||||
Principal payments on long-term debt |
(2,346 | ) | (1,665 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from lease financing and short-term debt |
| 3,549 | ||||||||||
Borrowings (repayments) on revolving line of credit, net |
(863 | ) | 3,845 | |||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated debt |
| 1,500 | ||||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
| 11 | ||||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities of continuing
operations |
(3,209 | ) | 7,240 | |||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities of discontinued
operations |
(1,987 | ) | 1,021 | |||||||||
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION |
| 50 | ||||||||||
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
3,958 | 427 | ||||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
197 | 22 | ||||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
$ | 4,155 | $ | 449 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
PHARMCHEM, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation, General and Business
PharmChem, Inc. is a leading independent laboratory that provides integrated drug testing services. Our customers include private and public employers, criminal justice agencies and drug treatment programs in the United States who seek to detect and deter the use of illegal drugs and alcohol. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PharmChem and Medscreen Limited (Medscreen), a United Kingdom company. Medscreen was sold on March 25, 2002 and, as a result, is presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying financial statements for all periods presented. Medscreens financial statements were translated based on the month-end spot rate for the balance sheets and a weighted average of the spot rates for the statements of operations.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q, are unaudited and do not include all the information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. We have made certain reclassifications to prior year amounts to conform to current year presentation. All adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the interim periods have been made and are of a recurring nature unless otherwise disclosed herein. The results of operations for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for a full year.
In the first quarter of 2002, we implemented Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 142 (SFAS 142), Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS 142 requires goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 142. This Statement further requires intangible assets with definite useful lives to be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. As permitted by SFAS 142, we implemented the impairment provisions in the second quarter of 2002. On an ongoing basis, the amortization of goodwill noted in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations was eliminated beginning January 1, 2002. The following table shows the Companys net loss excluding the goodwill amortization in 2001 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
8
Three Months | Nine Months | ||||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||
Reported net loss from continuing operations |
$ | (825 | ) | $ | (1,917 | ) | $ | (1,343 | ) | $ | (8,651 | ) | |||||
Amortization of PharmChem, Inc. goodwill |
| 33 | | 97 | |||||||||||||
Adjusted net loss from continuing operations |
(825 | ) | (1,884 | ) | (1,343 | ) | (8,554 | ) | |||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
| 245 | 359 | 722 | |||||||||||||
Amortization of Medscreen, Ltd. goodwill |
| 14 | | 42 | |||||||||||||
Adjusted net income from discontinued operations |
| 259 | 359 | 764 | |||||||||||||
Gain from sale of discontinued operations |
| | 4,277 | | |||||||||||||
Adjusted net income (loss) |
$ | (825 | ) | $ | (1,625 | ) | $ | 3,293 | $ | (7,790 | ) | ||||||
Adjusted net loss from continuing operations per share |
$ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.32 | ) | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (1.46 | ) | |||||
Adjusted net income from discontinued operations per
diluted share |
| 0.04 | 0.79 | 0.13 | |||||||||||||
Adjusted net income (loss) per diluted share |
$ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.28 | ) | $ | 0.56 | $ | (1.33 | ) | ||||||
2. Discontinued Operations
On March 25, 2002, we completed the sale of Medscreen for approximately $10.0 million. In connection with the sale, Medscreens two loan facilities totaling approximately $1,663,000 were fully repaid. Closing and other settlement costs totaled approximately $324,000 and approximately $929,000 was used to repay a portion of our revolving line of credit. In April 2002, we fully repaid the term loan ($989,000) with our primary bank and made further repayments on our revolving line of credit (see Note 5 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). The remainder of the proceeds have been and will be used for general corporate purposes.
Net sales of the discontinued operations were $1,786,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2001, and $1,949,000 and $5,460,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. We recorded a gain on the sale of Medscreen of $0.73 per diluted share.
3. Net Income (Loss) per Share
We compute and disclose our income (loss) per share in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings Per Share, which requires the presentation of basic and diluted income per share. Basic income (loss) per share is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income per share is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive potential common shares represent shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options and warrants and are calculated using the treasury stock method.
Options and warrants to purchase 1,185,000 and 1,209,000 shares of our common stock for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted income per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
9
4. Inventory
Inventory includes laboratory materials, collection materials and products and is stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using standard costs, including freight, that approximate actual costs on a first-in, first-out basis. Inventory consisted of the following at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 (in thousands):
2002 | 2001 | |||||||
Laboratory materials |
$ | 215 | $ | 294 | ||||
Collection materials |
586 | 1,031 | ||||||
Products |
510 | 835 | ||||||
$ | 1,311 | $ | 2,160 | |||||
5. Debt
Our debt at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 consisted of the following (in thousands):
2002 | 2001 | |||||||
Revolving line of credit |
$ | 3,681 | $ | 4,544 | ||||
Term installment note (repaid in April 2002) |
| 1,103 | ||||||
Subordinated debt, net of discount of $172 and $302 at September
30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively, due September, 2003 |
1,328 | 1,198 | ||||||
Obligations under capitalized leases, due in monthly installments
through 2005, secured by laboratory equipment, office
equipment
and computer software, interest rates ranging from 8% to 9% |
2,153 | 3,397 | ||||||
7,162 | 10,242 | |||||||
Less: current portion and revolving line of credit |
(6,103 | ) | (7,212 | ) | ||||
Long-term portion |
$ | 1,059 | $ | 3,030 | ||||
On July 31, 2002, the Company entered into a Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the Agreement) with its principal lender whereby the line of credit is $4,250,000, the maturity date is June 30, 2003, interest is at the prime rate plus one-half percent (5.25% as of September 30, 2002), and the annual fee is 0.10% of the credit line, payable quarterly. The financial covenants include a current ratio of no less than 0.85 to 1.00, total liabilities to effective tangible net worth of not more than 2.00 to 1.00, and minimum effective tangible net worth of not less than $10 million (including subordinated debt)all measured quarterly. In addition, the Company is required to be profitable for the 2002 fiscal year and quarterly in 2003. Also, the Agreement provides for a limitation on capital expenditures and requires a restricted cash balance of $500,000.
The July 31, 2002 Agreement permits borrowings on eligible receivables up to 85% thereof and is secured by a lien on a significant portion of our assets. It also permits up to $2,000,000 of the revolving line of credit to be used to repurchase our common stock under our common stock repurchase program and permits the declaration and distribution of a dividend in connection with our stockholder rights plan.
10
As of September 30, 2002, the calculated maximum that could be borrowed and the amount outstanding were both $3,681,000. We were in compliance with our covenants as of September 30, 2002.
6. Restructuring Charge
During the second quarter of 2001, our Board of Directors approved a plan to close our Menlo Park, California corporate headquarters, main laboratory and distribution center and relocate these operations to Texas. These expenses were accrued and recorded in continuing operations for the three months ended June 30, 2001. Detail of the payment activity and ending accrual balance related to the restructuring is presented in the following table (in thousands):
Accrual | Accrual | ||||||||||||
As of | As of | ||||||||||||
December 31, | 2002 | September 30, | |||||||||||
2001 | Payments | 2002 | |||||||||||
Severance and related benefits |
$ | 74 | $ | (63 | ) | $ | 11 | ||||||
Clean-up and remediation |
213 | (42 | ) | 171 | |||||||||
Repairs |
9 | | 9 | ||||||||||
Legal and other |
67 | (4 | ) | 63 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 363 | $ | (109 | ) | $ | 254 | ||||||
The restructuring plan was designed to provide for costs associated with leaving our facilities in Menlo Park, California. The restructuring expenses represent estimated and actual costs related to workforce reductions, clean-up, repairs and legal services. As part of the workforce reduction, we recorded severance and related fringe benefits costs for approximately 160 employees from operations and administration, of which 155 employees were terminated as of September 30, 2002. The clean-up and remediation includes removal of a previously unknown storage vault and potential restoration of the facility per the lease agreement. Repairs includes sewer line repair or replacement as contractually provided for in the lease agreement. The accrual balance of $254,000 is classified as a component in Accrued collectors and other liabilities on the balance sheet. Costs for relocation were expensed as incurred.
On September 19, 2002, the Companys attorneys received a letter from counsel for the landlord of the Companys former Menlo Park, California facility claiming damages in the amount of $4.7 million. This amount is based primarily on the landlords claim for lost and reduced rent arising from the Companys alleged failure to vacate the Menlo Park premises timely under the terms of the lease. The Company and its counsel are currently reviewing the details of this claim and the Company will defend itself vigorously.
11
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward Looking Statements
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, which are subject to the safe harbor created by these Sections. Our actual future results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Some factors which could cause future actual results to differ materially from our recent results and those projected in the forward-looking statements are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. We assume no obligation to update the forward-looking statements or such factors.
Recent Events
During 2001, we relocated our corporate headquarters, distribution center and laboratory operations from the Silicon Valley area of Northern California to a new facility in Haltom City, Texas. We vacated our primary California facility in May 2001 and temporarily moved to our existing facility in Fort Worth, Texas until construction was completed at the new Haltom City facility. During the process of relocating to Texas, we incurred significant costs that were financed through a combination of internal operations, increased borrowing under our existing and new credit facilities and a sale-leaseback transaction. We believe these costs were of a nonrecurring nature and principally relate to the period prior to occupying our new Haltom City facility. Our laboratory operations and distribution center relocated to the Haltom City facility in September and October, 2001, respectively. To mitigate further operating losses, we implemented a cost containment program in September of 2001 which is continuing in 2002. This cost containment program included two rounds of layoffs whereby our employee population has decreased approximately 30% from mid-2001 levels, significant reductions in discretionary spending, including travel and marketing, renegotiations with certain suppliers to secure more favorable pricing of materials and services, and the closure of our satellite laboratory in California that performed methadone drug testing.
As further discussed in Note 2 of the accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, in March 2002 we completed the sale of Medscreen for approximately $10,000,000 in cash. A portion of the sale proceeds were used to repay debt and the remainder is expected to be sufficient to fund the general corporate needs of the US operations for the next year.
12
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon PharmChems consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate these estimates, including those related to bad debts, inventories, goodwill, restructuring accruals, contingencies, revenue recognition, specimen collector accruals and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
PharmChem believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. We estimate the quantity and value of our unused specimen collection kit inventory existing at our customer and contract specimen collector field locations using a model that considers actual shipments to these locations, specimens returned to our laboratory for processing, replacement costs and estimates of shrinkage. If the estimated value of this inventory decreases beyond our expectations of recovery, additional inventory write-downs may be required.
Future adverse changes in market conditions or poor operating results of our operations could result in losses or an inability to recover the carrying value of the related goodwill, thereby possibly requiring an impairment charge in the future. Revenue is recognized upon the communication of results from laboratory analysis of specimens submitted by our customers, at the time of shipment for products and at the completion of rendered services. We accrue expected payments to specimen collectors who perform specimen collection services on behalf of our managed customers. The specimen collector accrual calculation is based on a combination of our reporting of results from laboratory analysis of specimens and cost information maintained in our internal systems for each specimen collector. We include in the accrual estimates of retroactive rate increases and services performed but not reported to customers.
13
Results of Operations
Refer to Note 2, Discontinued Operations, to the accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the recently completed sale of Medscreen in March 2002. The following table sets forth for the periods indicated certain financial data (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2002 | 2001 | 2002 | 2001 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(As a % of net sales) | (As a % of net sales) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NET SALES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Workplace employers analysis |
$ | 1,913 | $ | 3,019 | 26.2 | % | 30.7 | % | $ | 6,626 | $ | 9,904 | 29.0 | % | 34.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Criminal justice agencies analysis |
3,628 | 4,640 | 49.6 | 47.2 | 11,360 | 12,622 | 49.7 | 44.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other analysis |
61 | 301 | 0.8 | 3.1 | 151 | 811 | 0.7 | 2.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Products and other |
1,714 | 1,864 | 23.4 | 19.0 | 4,721 | 5,151 | 20.6 | 18.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total net sales |
7,316 | 9,824 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 22,858 | 28,488 | 100.0 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COST OF SALES |
5,790 | 8,935 | 79.1 | 91.0 | 17,707 | 25,863 | 77.5 | 90.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GROSS PROFIT |
1,526 | 889 | 20.9 | 9.0 | 5,151 | 2,625 | 22.5 | 9.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
2,193 | 2,699 | 30.0 | 27.5 | 6,139 | 9,938 | 26.8 | 34.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of goodwill |
| 33 | | 0.3 | | 97 | | 0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring charge |
| | | | | 1,029 | | 3.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
2,193 | 2,732 | 30.0 | 27.8 | 6,139 | 11,064 | 26.8 | 38.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS |
(667 | ) | (1,843 | ) | (9.1 | ) | (18.8 | ) | (988 | ) | (8,439 | ) | (4.3 | ) | (29.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
OTHER EXPENSE, net |
158 | 115 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 424 | 253 | 1.8 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BENEFIT FROM INCOME TAXES |
| (41 | ) | | (0.4 | ) | (69 | ) | (41 | ) | (0.3 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
(825 | ) | (1,917 | ) | (11.3 | ) | (19.5 | ) | (1,343 | ) | (8,651 | ) | (5.8 | ) | (30.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations,
net of applicable income taxes |
| 245 | | 2.5 | 359 | 722 | 1.5 | 2.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of disposition, net of
applicable income taxes |
| | | 4,277 | | 18.7 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ | (825 | ) | $ | (1,672 | ) | (11.3 | )% | (17.0 | )% | $ | 3,293 | $ | (7,929 | ) | 14.4 | % | (27.8 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Third Quarter 2002 vs. 2001
Net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2002 were $7,316,000, a decrease of 25.5% from last years third quarter sales of $9,824,000. In this years third quarter, laboratory specimen volume fell by nearly 33% from the same period a year ago. The third quarter has typically been one where specimen volumes from workplace customers accelerate in advance of hiring for the winter holidays. We believe that this did not occur in the current years third quarter, primarily because of the economic downturn. Volume from criminal justice customers was negatively affected because certain of these customers have migrated from laboratory testing to less costly on-site testing devices sold by the Companys competitors. Average selling prices of laboratory analysis rose slightly in the current quarter but this is a function of customer and service mix as there have been no significant price increases in 2002. Sales of products and other services were lower by 8.0%, which is also a reflection of the weak economy.
14
Cost of sales for the three months ended September 30, 2002 was $5,790,000 (79.1% of net sales), a decrease of 35.2% from last years third quarter cost of sales of $8,935,000 (91.0% of net sales). Last years amount includes $1,602,000 of nonrecurring costs related to our relocation from California to Texas. Excluding this item, last years pro forma cost of sales would have been $7,333,000 (74.6% of net sales).
On a pro forma basis, this years cost of sales is $1,543,000 (21.0%) lower than last years amount as compared to the 25.5% sales decrease. Nearly every cost element was lower in 2002 versus 2001 with the exception of health insurance, repairs and depreciation. Also, the cost of specimen collections (conducted for the Company by third parties) was down 22.2% in absolute dollars and 23.9% in volume versus the prior years quarter. However, the 2002 per specimen collection cost has increased each of the past three quarters and is 7.0% higher than the fourth quarter of 2001. The Company has embarked on a program to lower its collection costs but any benefits will not be seen until later in 2002 or early in 2003.
The lower cost of sales this year is a result of lower specimen volume coupled with operating efficiencies and a cost reduction program implemented in late 2001, which is continuing into 2002. Fixed overhead was lower by 21.6% in spite of higher depreciation related to systems and equipment at the new facility being placed into service. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased to 20.9% in 2002 from 9.0% in 2001. Excluding the nonrecurring costs of $1,602,000, 2001s gross profit on a pro forma basis would have been $2,491,000 and the gross profit margin would have been 25.4%. Lower volume this year was not sufficient to absorb fixed overhead at a level to improve the gross profit margin.
Selling, General & Administrative (SG&A) expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2002 decreased $506,000 (18.7%) to $2,193,000 in 2002 from $2,699,000 in 2001. The decrease partially reflects lower travel, marketing and consulting expenses resulting from the cost containment program implemented in the latter part of 2001. In addition, the prior year included $259,000 of nonrecurring costs associated with the relocation of our Company to Texas. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales increased to 30.0% in 2002 from 27.5% in 2001. Excluding the nonrecurring costs, SG&A on a pro forma basis in 2001 would have been $2,440,000, or 24.8% of net sales. The current quarters SG&A would have been lower than last years pro forma SG&A by 10.1%.
Discontinued Operations for the three months ended September 30, 2001 generated income of $245,000, or $0.04 per diluted share. There were no discontinued operations in the third quarter of 2002.
Net loss from continuing operations for the three months ended September 30, 2002 was $825,000 or $0.14 per share compared to a net loss of $1,917,000 or $0.33 per share in 2001. The net loss in 2001, after the inclusion of income from discontinued operations, was $1,672,000, or $0.29 per share. Excluding the $1,861,000 of nonrecurring expenses associated with the Companys relocation and $33,000 of goodwill amortization, the pro forma loss from continuing operations in 2001 would have been $23,000, or $0.00 per share.
15
Nine Months 2002 vs. 2001
Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 decreased $5,630,000 (19.8%) to $22,858,000 in 2002 from $28,488,000 in 2001. Specimen volume was down in all customer classes with workplace volume down significantly more than criminal justice. Sales of products and other services were lower by only 8.3%.
Cost of sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 decreased $8,156,000 (31.5%) to $17,707,000 in 2002 (77.5% of net sales) from $25,863,000 in 2001 (90.8% of net sales). Last years cost of sales includes $4,106,000 of nonrecurring costs directly related to our relocation to Texas. Excluding these nonrecurring costs, last years cost of sales on a pro forma basis would have been $21,757,000 (76.4% of net sales). This years cost of sales is lower than last years pro forma cost of sales by $4,050,000, or 18.6%. This reduction is attributable to lower specimen volume, operating efficiencies, and the cost containment program implemented late last year, and is nearly the same as the sales decrease of 19.8%. Nearly all cost components were lower with the exception of health insurance and depreciation. Collection costs were lower in absolute dollars by 17.2% versus a 17.1% decrease in the number of collections. However, in the past nine months, the per specimen collection cost has risen 6.0% since last years fourth quarter. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased to 22.5% in 2002 from 9.2% in 2001. Excluding the nonrecurring costs, 2001s gross profit would have been, on a pro forma basis, $6,731,000 and the gross profit margin would have been 23.6%.
Selling, General & Administrative (SG&A) expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 decreased $3,799,000 (38.2%) to $6,139,000 in 2002 (26.8% of net sales) from $9,938,000 in 2001 (34.9% of net sales). Last years SG&A expenses include $1,761,000 of nonrecurring costs associated with the relocation of our Company from California to Texas. These nonrecurring costs include significant relocation, travel and subsistence expenses. This years SG&A expenses reflect a reduction in costs related to sales, marketing, customer service and information systems. On a pro forma basis, last years SG&A for the first nine months would have been $8,177,000 (28.7% of net sales), or 33.2% higher than this years SG&A amount.
Restructuring Charge of $1,029,000 was recorded in 2001s second quarter in accordance with a plan approved by our Board of Directors to provide for costs associated with closing our former headquarters and main laboratory in Menlo Park, California. The charge consisted of $330,000 for severance and related benefits costs of a workforce reduction and $699,000 for repairs, clean-up and professional services.
Discontinued Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 resulted in net income of $4,636,000 (or $0.79 per diluted share), which is comprised of net income from Medscreens operations for three months of $359,000 (or $0.06 per diluted share) and the gain on the sale of Medscreen of $4,277,000 (or $0.73 per diluted share). These operations in 2001 generated net income of $722,000 (or $0.12 per share) and reflect nine months of operations.
Net Loss from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 was $1,343,000 or $0.23 per share compared to a net loss in 2001 of $8,651,000, or $1.48 per share. Excluding the impact of the $5,867,000 in nonrecurring costs, the $1,029,000 restructuring charge and $97,000 of goodwill amortization, the net loss from continuing operations for the nine months ended
16
September 30, 2001 would have been $1,658,000, or $0.28 per share. The net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, including discontinued operations, was $3,293,000, or $0.56 per diluted share versus a net loss in 2001 of $7,929,000, or $1.36 per share.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our continuing operations during the nine-month periods ended September 30 provided cash of $716,000 and used cash of $4,003,000 in 2002 and 2001, respectively. The increase in cash flow from operations between 2002 and 2001 principally reflects a lower loss from continuing operations in 2002 and improved working capital management. The cash used in 2001 reflects expenses related to the relocation of the Companys operations to Texas. As of September 30, 2002, we had $4,155,000 in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents. During the nine months ended September 30, 2002, we used approximately $1,183,000 in cash to purchase property and equipment, principally for information systems development and facility-related expenditures for our new Haltom City, Texas location.
On July 31, 2002, the Company entered into a Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the Agreement) with its principal lender whereby the line of credit is $4,250,000, the maturity date is June 30, 2003, interest is at the prime rate plus one-half percent (5.25% as of September 30, 2002), and the annual fee is 0.10% of the credit line, payable quarterly. The financial covenants include a current ratio of no less than 0.85 to 1.00, total liabilities to effective tangible net worth of not more than 2.0 to 1.00, and minimum effective tangible net worth of not less than $10 million (including subordinated debt)all measured quarterly. In addition, the Company is required to be profitable for the 2002 fiscal year and quarterly in 2003. Also, the Agreement provides for a limitation on capital expenditures and requires a restricted cash balance of $500,000.
The July 31, 2002 Agreement permits borrowings on eligible receivables up to 85% thereof and is secured by a lien on a significant portion of our assets. It permits up to $2,000,000 of the revolving line of credit to be used to repurchase our common stock under our common stock repurchase program and permits the declaration and distribution of a dividend in connection with our stockholder rights plan.
As of September 30, 2002, the calculated maximum that could be borrowed and the amount outstanding were both $3,681,000.
We anticipate the existing cash balances, amounts available under existing and future credit agreements and funds to be generated from future operations will be sufficient to fund operations and forecasted capital expenditures through the foreseeable future.
Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement No. 144 (SFAS 144), Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. SFAS 144 supercedes SFAS 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of, in that it removes goodwill from its impairment scope and allows for different approaches in cash flow estimation. However, SFAS 144 retains the fundamental provisions of SFAS 121 for (a) recognition and measurement of the impairment of long-lived assets to be held and used and (b) measurement of long-lived assets to be disposed of. SFAS 144 also supercedes the
17
business segment concept in APB Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Results of OperationsReporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions, in that it permits presentation of a component of an entity, whether classified as held for sale or disposed of, as a discontinued operation. SFAS 144 retains the requirement of APB Opinion No. 30 to report discontinued operations separately from continuing operations. We adopted the provisions of SFAS 144 in the first quarter of 2002 and the implementation of this standard did not have a material effect on our results of operations or financial position.
Effective January 1, 2002, we implemented FASB Statement No. 142 (SFAS 142), Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS 142 requires goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 142. As permitted by SFAS 142, we implemented the impairment provisions in the second quarter of 2002. This Statement further requires intangible assets with definite useful lives to be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. On an ongoing basis, the amortization of goodwill noted in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations was eliminated beginning January 1, 2002.
In June 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 143 (SFAS 143), Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. SFAS 143 requires liability recognition for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. We are required to adopt the provisions of SFAS 143 no later than January 1, 2003. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are subject to market risk with respect to our debt outstanding. Our revolving credit agreement carries interest at the prime rate plus 0.50%. As the prime rate increases, we will incur higher relative interest expense and similarly, a decrease in the prime rate will reduce relative interest expense. A 1.0% change in the prime rate would not materially change interest expense assuming levels of debt consistent with historical amounts. The market risks are not considered significant and, therefore, we do not intend to engage in significant hedging transactions.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Within the 90 days prior to the date of this report, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to us required to be included in our periodic SEC filings. There have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.
18
PART II. Other Information
Item 5. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits:
10.53* | - - | Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement between Comerica Bank-California and PharmChem, Inc. dated July 31, 2002. | ||
10.54* | - - | Intellectual Property Security Agreement between Comerica Bank-California and PharmChem, Inc. dated July 31, 2002. | ||
99.1 | - - | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
99.2 | - - | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
* | Incorporated by reference from the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
None.
19
Signature
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PharmChem, Inc. (Registrant) |
Date: November 14, 2002 | By: | /S/ David A. Lattanzio |
David A. Lattanzio Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Finance and Administration (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
20
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Joseph W. Halligan, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PharmChem, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; | ||
b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and | ||
c) | presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) | all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and | ||
b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Dated: November 14, 2002
/s/ Joseph W.
Halligan Joseph W. Halligan President and Chief Executive Officer |
21
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
I, David A. Lattanzio, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PharmChem, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; | ||
b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and | ||
c) | presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) | all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and | ||
b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Dated: November 14, 2002
/s/ David A.
Lattanzio David A. Lattanzio Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
22
EXHIBIT INDEX
10.53* | - - | Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement between Comerica Bank-California and PharmChem, Inc. dated July 31, 2002. | ||
10.54* | - - | Intellectual Property Security Agreement between Comerica Bank-California and PharmChem, Inc. dated July 31, 2002. | ||
99.1 | - - | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
99.2 | - - | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
* | Incorporated by reference from the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 |