Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[x]		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
		For the quarterly period ended September 29, 2002

OR

[  ]		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
		For the transition period from      to

Commission File Number 0-9653

XICOR, INC.

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (408) 432-8888

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [x] No [   ]

NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING AT SEPTEMBER 29, 2002
23,630,151

Table of Contents

XICOR, INC.

FORM 10-Q

QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 29, 2002

INDEX

i

Table of Contents

Part I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

XICOR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial information

1

Table of Contents

XICOR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial information

2

Table of Contents

XICOR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial information

3

Table of Contents

XICOR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(Unaudited)

Note 1 — The Company:

In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results of the interim periods presented (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) have been included. These financial statements, notes and analyses should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Note 2 — Net income (loss) per share:

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and all dilutive potential common shares outstanding. Outstanding options to purchase 6,557,143 and 4,807,808 shares of common stock at September 29, 2002, and September 30, 2001, respectively, were excluded from the earnings per share (EPS) computation for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2002 and the nine months ended September 30, 2001 as they were anti-dilutive.

Note 3 — Comprehensive income (loss):

The net income (loss) for the periods reported also represented the comprehensive income (loss) for such periods.

Note 4 — Balance sheet components:

4

Table of Contents

Accounts receivable:

Accounts receivable at September 29, 2002 and December 31, 2001 are presented net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $500,000.

Restructuring:

In the first quarter of 2001, we announced our plan to exit from offering stand alone low-density serial EEPROM memory products and complete the move to fully outsourced test and assembly operations. Accordingly, our first quarter 2001 results included a $3.2 million restructuring charge and an $8.2 million charge to cost of sales to write down inventories to their net realizable value. The restructuring charge included a $2.0 million accrual consisting of $1.5 million of severance-related costs for a reduction in our workforce of approximately 95 employees and $0.5 million of other restructuring related costs. The $1.2 million balance of the restructuring charge recorded in the first quarter of 2001 related principally to the write-off of leasehold improvements in the facility that was vacated as a result of the restructuring plan.

Due to the ongoing weak industry conditions, we reduced our workforce by 33 additional employees during the second quarter of 2002. Accordingly, our second quarter 2002 results included a $0.8 million restructuring charge for the severance-related costs associated with the reduction. At September 29, 2002, the restructuring accrual of $0.2 million consisted of $0.1 million of severance costs payable to terminated employees and $0.1 million of other costs associated with vacated sales offices.

The following table summarizes the restructuring reserve activity for the nine months ended September 29, 2002 (in thousands):

Note 5. — Legal Proceedings:

In June 2002, we settled a patent infringement case we filed against Catalyst Semiconductor on July 16, 2001 in Delaware Federal District Court. As part of the overall settlement, Catalyst acknowledged the validity of our patent and agreed to certain royalty payments in exchange for a license to manufacture the disputed products.

Note 6. — Acquisition of Analog Integration Partners LLC:

On April 16, 2002, we acquired Analog Integration Partners, LLC (AIP), a privately held company that designs and develops high-performance analog signal processing and data conversion circuits. AIP implements high frequency analog front-end technology and signal processing solutions in standard digital logic processes. The AIP acquisition brings us analog mixed-signal design talent and core technology on which we plan to build.

5

Table of Contents

The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting per Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141. Accordingly, the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were included in our consolidated balance sheet as of April 16, 2002, the effective date of the purchase. The results of operations are included in our consolidated results of operations since the effective date of the purchase. We acquired AIP for total consideration of $15.5 million, consisting of $10.2 million of stock (1,012,758 shares of Xicor common stock valued at $10.05 per share, the average closing price for the three days ended April 16, 2002), $5.0 million in cash, and direct acquisition costs of $0.3 million for legal, appraisal and accounting fees. The total purchase price was allocated to the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows based upon an independent appraisal (in thousands):

The amounts allocated to current technology and professional services are being amortized using the straight-line method over their useful lives of 3 years and 8 months, respectively. The net tangible assets acquired consist primarily of accounts receivable, partially offset by accounts payable. None of the $10.8 million in goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes, and in accordance with SFAS No. 142 will not be amortized but instead evaluated periodically to determine whether events or circumstances have occurred indicating that goodwill might be impaired.

The $1.8 million of in-process research and development expensed in the second quarter of 2002 relates to AIP’s current engineering effort that is focused on developing the analog front end for the high-end flat panel display market using a standard digital 0.18 micron CMOS process. The value of the in-process research and development was determined by an independent appraiser using a discounted cash flow method that considered several factors including projected financial results, relative risk of successful development, time value of money and level of completion. Projected financial results were based on a number of estimates including market growth rates, the company’s competitive position, the product roadmap, the company’s cost structure, development timelines, resource requirements and the long-term effective tax rate. The risk-adjusted discount rate used for projected cash flows was 50%. Revenues related to products developed under this project are planned to begin toward the end of 2003.

Note 7. – Other Income and Expense

Other income for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2002 includes $0.7 million from a favorable sales tax audit and $0.2 million, the remaining balance of the deferred gain on the sale of the fab, from the early termination of a wafer foundry agreement with Standard MEMS. Other expense for the nine months ended September 29, 2002 includes a non-cash impairment charge of $2.5 million to write-off an investment held in a private company.

6

Table of Contents

Note 8. – Subsequent Events

In the fourth quarter of 2002 we signed a lease agreement for a facility to be used as our corporate headquarters. The lease is for eight years beginning in December 2002 and provides for lower annual lease payments than our present lease. We expect to abandon our current facility in fourth quarter of 2002. Terminating our current lease and entering into the new lease will reduce our future minimum lease commitments by approximately $0.3 million per year in 2003 through 2009. Our minimum lease commitment will increase by $1.2 million in 2010 as the new lease term is one year longer than our present facility lease term. The relocation of our facilities is expected to result in charges in the fourth quarter of 2002 of approximately $1 million relating to the exit costs from our current leased facility and the non-cash abandonment of leasehold improvements and office equipment at our current facility.

Note 9. — Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Exit or Disposal Activities” (“SFAS 146”). SFAS 146 addresses significant issues regarding the recognition, measurement, and reporting of costs that are associated with exit and disposal activities, including restructuring activities that are currently accounted for under EITF No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring).” The scope of SFAS 146 includes costs related to terminating a contract that is not a capital lease and termination benefits that employees who are involuntarily terminated receive under the terms of a one-time benefit arrangement that is not an ongoing benefit arrangement or an individual deferred-compensation contract. SFAS 146 will be effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002 and early application is encouraged. We plan to adopt SFAS 146 for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2003. The provisions of EITF No. 94-3 continue to apply for an exit activity initiated under an exit plan that met the criteria of EITF No. 94-3 prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 146. The effect on adoption of SFAS No. 146 will change on a prospective basis the timing of when restructuring charges are recorded from a commitment date approach to when the liability is incurred.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Quarterly Financial Information and Notes thereto and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in future periods. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements which are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the factors identified in the “Factors Affecting Future Results” section below. Also see “Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995” below.

7

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Sales

Sales for the third quarter of 2002 were $9.7 million and included $0.3 million of non-recurring royalty revenue from licenses on mixed-signal technology. Sales for the second quarter of 2002 were $9.5 million. Sales for the first quarter of 2002 were $10.0 million and included a benefit of $0.4 million resulting from putting all our global distribution partners on our fiscal calendar. This change was made in connection with the realignment of our distribution channel to better serve fulfillment and demand creation efforts.

Our sales are derived from two product groups, mixed-signal and memory. Mixed-signal sales represent our core market. Memory sales comprise our legacy businesses of serial EEPROMs, which we are in the process of exiting, and parallel EEPROMs, which business we are retaining. Sales by product group were (in thousands):

Overall economic and industry-wide conditions were weak in 2001, and while mixed-signal sales were level sequentially in the first two quarters of 2001, mixed-signal sales declined in the second half of 2001 on lower unit sales. Sales of mixed-signal products for the first quarter of 2002 remained relatively stable at $4.8 million compared to $5.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2001. Mixed-signal sales increased 27% sequentially to $6.1 million in the second quarter of 2002 on higher unit sales. Mixed-signal product sales increased 8% sequentially to $6.6 million in the third quarter of 2002 on higher unit sales.

As shown in the table below, memory product sales declined 60% in both the three and nine months ended September 29, 2002 compared to the comparable prior year periods (in thousands):

Serial EEPROM product sales have declined, and are expected to continue to decline, as we continue our exit from that business. Parallel EEPROM product sales decreased year over year

8

Table of Contents

principally due to lower unit shipments. Furthermore, we believe that the fourth quarter of 2002 will be challenging for our mixed-signal business as the difficult industry conditions experienced in 2001 and 2002 to date are expected to continue. As a result, we expect total sales for the fourth quarter of 2002 to be significantly below the fourth quarter of 2001 and anticipate incurring a loss in the fourth quarter of 2002.

Cost of Sales and Gross Profit

The third quarter 2002 gross profit percentage, including royalty revenue was 54%. The gross profit percentage on product sales for the quarter was 53% compared to 50% in the third quarter of 2001. Gross profit as a percentage of sales was 51% for the nine months ended September 29, 2002 compared to 33% for the comparable 2001 period. As discussed below, cost of sales for the first quarter of 2001 included an $8.2 million charge to write down inventories. Excluding the inventory write-down, gross profit as a percentage of sales was 47% for the nine months ended September 30, 2001.

The gross profit percentage in the third quarter and nine months ended September 29, 2002 benefited from a shift in the product mix to a larger percentage of higher margin mixed-signal and parallel EEPROM sales and a smaller percentage of lower margin serial EEPROM sales, the quarterly amortization of $0.6 million of the deferred gain on the sale of the fab assets over a lower sales level and lower manufacturing costs. The gross profit percentage for the nine months ended September 29, 2002 also benefited from lower costs associated with the shift to fully outsourced manufacturing. These benefits were partially offset by lower absorption of fixed costs as manufacturing volumes were reduced in 2002 due to the weak industry-wide economic conditions.

The gross profit percentage on product sales increased from 49% in the second quarter of 2002 to 53% in the third quarter of 2002. The gross profit percentage improvement in the third quarter of 2002 was primarily the result of lower manufacturing costs and increased production volumes. The gross profit percentage is expected to fluctuate from quarter to quarter as a result of changes in product mix, product costs and average selling prices. Excluding the $0.6 million quarterly benefit from the amortization of the deferred gain on the sale of our wafer fabrication assets which ended in the third quarter of 2002 due to the early termination of a wafer foundry agreement with Standard MEMS, the third quarter gross profit percentage on product sales was 46% compared to 43% in the second quarter of 2002. We currently anticipate our gross profit percentage in the fourth quarter of 2002 will improve slightly from 46% (third quarter of 2002 product gross profit percentage excluding amortization benefit) on reduced manufacturing costs and increased unit output.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses amounted to $3.4 million or 36% of sales in the third quarter of 2002 compared to $3.2 million or 21% of sales in the third quarter of 2001. Research and development expenses increased in the third quarter of 2002 compared to the third quarter of 2001 primarily due to increased personnel costs resulting from the second quarter 2002 acquisition of AIP. The increased personnel costs were partially offset by spending controls.

9

Table of Contents

In the nine months ended September 29, 2002, research and development expenses were $9.6 million or 33% of sales compared to $10.8 million or 19% of sales in the nine months ended September 29, 2001. While research and development expenses increased as a percentage of sales in the nine months ended September 29, 2002 compared to the prior year due to the lower sales level, the dollar amount of research and development expenses decreased, primarily due to spending controls.

Selling, General and Administrative

Selling, general and administrative expenses amounted to $2.8 million or 28% of sales in the third quarter of 2002 compared to $4.1 million or 27% of sales in the third quarter of 2001. In the nine months ended September 29, 2002, selling, general and administrative expenses amounted to $8.6 million or 29% of sales compared to $15.0 million or 26% of sales in the comparable prior year period. The decrease in the dollar amount of selling, general and administrative expenses in the three and nine months ended September 29, 2002 compared to the comparable periods of 2001 is primarily due to headcount reductions and lower commission expenses related to the decreased sales in 2002.

Restructuring

In the fourth quarter of 2000, we committed to certain workforce reductions to streamline operations and further implement our outsourced manufacturing strategy. The related restructuring accrual balance of $2.5 million at December 31, 2000 consisted of $2.0 million of severance costs to reduce our workforce by approximately 50 employees, primarily in administrative, manufacturing and support groups, and $0.5 million of other restructuring related costs.

In the first quarter of 2001, we announced our plan to exit from offering stand alone low-density serial EEPROM memory products and complete the move to fully outsourced test and assembly operations. Accordingly, our first quarter 2001 results included a $3.2 million restructuring charge and an $8.2 million charge to cost of sales to write down inventories to their net realizable value. The restructuring charge included a $2.0 million accrual consisting of $1.5 million of severance-related costs for an additional reduction in our workforce of approximately 95 employees, primarily in manufacturing, sales and support groups, and $0.5 million of other restructuring related costs. The $1.2 million balance of the restructuring charge recorded in the first quarter of 2001 related principally to the write-off of leasehold improvements in the facility that was vacated as a result of our restructuring plan.

During 2001, we reduced our workforce by approximately 140 employees and utilized $3.1 million of the restructuring reserve for related severance costs and $0.7 million for other restructuring related costs. At December 31, 2001, the restructuring accrual of $0.7 million consisted of $0.4 million of severance costs (including costs to reduce our workforce by approximately 10 employees primarily in sales and administrative groups) and $0.3 million of other costs associated with vacated sales offices.

In the three months ended March 31, 2002, we completed the previously accrued reduction in workforce and utilized $0.3 million of the restructuring reserve for related severance costs and $0.2 million for other restructuring related costs.

10

Table of Contents

Due to the ongoing weak industry conditions, we reduced our workforce by 33 additional employees during the second quarter of 2002. Accordingly, our second quarter 2002 results included a $0.8 million restructuring charge for the severance-related costs associated with the reduction. Quarterly cost reductions of approximately $0.7 million associated with the second quarter 2002 reduction in workforce were partially offset by increased research and development expense. At September 29, 2002, the restructuring accrual of $0.2 million consisted of $0.1 million of severance costs payable to terminated employees and $0.1 million of other costs associated with vacated sales offices.

In the fourth quarter of 2002 we signed a lease agreement for a facility to be used as our corporate headquarters. The lease is for eight years beginning in December 2002 and provides for lower annual lease payments than our present lease. We expect to abandon our current facility in fourth quarter of 2002. Terminating our current lease and entering into the new lease will significantly reduce our future minimum lease commitments. The relocation of our facilities is expected to result in charges in the fourth quarter of 2002 of approximately $1 million relating to the exit costs from our current leased facility and the non-cash abandonment of leasehold improvements and office equipment at our current facility.

We continue to evaluate cost savings opportunities to align our spending with the sales levels and industry conditions.

Acquisition of Analog Integration Partners LLC

On April 16, 2002, we acquired AIP, a privately held company that designs and develops high-performance analog signal processing and data conversion circuits, for total consideration of $15.5 million, consisting of $10.2 million of stock (1,012,758 shares of Xicor common stock valued at $10.05 per share, the average closing price for the three days ended April 16, 2002), $5.0 million in cash, and direct acquisition costs of $0.3 million for legal, appraisal and accounting fees. The $2.7 million of the purchase price allocated to current technology and $0.1 million allocated to professional services are being amortized using the straight-line method over their useful lives of 3 years and 8 months, respectively. The related amortization expense in the three and nine months ended September 29, 2002 was $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively. The $10.8 million of the purchase price allocated to goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes, and in accordance with SFAS No. 142 will not be amortized but instead evaluated periodically to determine whether events or circumstances have occurred indicating that goodwill might be impaired.

The $1.8 million of the purchase price allocated to in-process research and development expense in the second quarter of 2002 relates to AIP’s current engineering effort that is focused on developing the analog front end for the high-end flat panel display market using a standard digital 0.18 micron CMOS process. The value of the in-process research and development was determined by an independent appraiser using a discounted cash flow method that considered several factors including projected financial results, relative risk of successful development, time value of money and level of completion. Projected financial results were based on a number of estimates including market growth rates, the company’s competitive position, the product roadmap, the company’s cost structure, development timelines, resource requirements and the

11

Table of Contents

long-term effective tax rate. The risk-adjusted discount rate used for projected cash flows was 50%. As of the acquisition date, the project was estimated to be approximately 5% complete and the estimated cost to complete the project was approximately $3 million. Revenues related to products developed under this project are planned to begin toward the end of 2003. Uncertainties and risks associated with completing development in a reasonable period of time include the remaining effort to achieve technological feasibility, rapidly changing customer markets and competition. Failure to bring these products to market in a timely manner could adversely impact our sales and profitability in the future and potentially impair the $10.8 million assigned to goodwill.

Other Income and Expense

Interest expense increased in the three and nine months ended September 29, 2002 compared to the comparable prior year periods due to interest expense and amortization resulting from our November 2001 issuance of $35 million of 5.5% convertible subordinated notes and warrants. We anticipate that interest expense will increase in 2002 compared to 2001 as the convertible subordinated notes and warrants are expected to be outstanding for the full year.

Interest income decreased in the three and nine months ended September 29, 2002 compared to the comparable prior year periods primarily as a result of lower interest rates partially offset by the increase in the average balance invested caused primarily by funds generated from the November 2001 issuance of convertible subordinated notes and warrants. Interest income is expected to decrease in the fourth quarter of 2002 compared to the fourth quarter of 2001 principally due to lower interest rates.

Other income for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2002 includes $700,000 from a favorable sales tax audit and $194,000 from the early termination of a wafer foundry agreement with Standard MEMS. Other income for the nine months ended September 29, 2002 also includes a $400,000 benefit associated with the sale of our wafer fabrication facility in 2000. Other expense for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2002 includes a non-cash impairment charge of $2.5 million to write-off an investment held in a private company.

Taxes

The provision for income taxes for 2001 consisted primarily of federal and state minimum taxes, which resulted from limitations on the use of net operating loss carryforwards, and foreign taxes. No taxes were provided in 2002 due to the net loss. Net deferred tax assets at September 29, 2002 and December 31, 2001 were fully reserved because of the uncertainty regarding the ultimate realization of these assets.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

At September 29, 2002, we had $38.1 million in cash and cash equivalents compared to $56.4 at the end of 2001. During the nine months ended September 29, 2002, we used $9.0 million of cash in operating activities (including $1.3 million associated with restructuring activities), $5.0 million for the acquisition of AIP, $2.5 million to purchase long-term investments, $1.9 million to purchase short-term investments, $0.5 million to repay long-term obligations and $0.4 million

12

Table of Contents

for equipment purchases. During the same time period, we generated $0.9 million from the issuance of stock under employee stock plans.

During the fourth quarter of 2002, we expect to use cash in operating activities (including interest payments on the convertible note), to repay long-term obligations and purchase equipment. Capital expenditures for 2002 are currently planned at less than $1.0 million and are primarily related to product design and equipment for product test development. At September 29, 2002, we had entered into commitments for equipment purchases aggregating less than $0.2 million. We believe that currently available cash will be adequate to support our operations for the next twelve months.

“Safe Harbor” Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

         This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements regarding the belief that the fourth quarter of 2002 will be challenging for our mixed-signal business as the difficult industry conditions experienced in 2001 and 2002 to date are expected to continue; the expectation of a decline in the Serial EEPROM product sales as we continue our exit from that business; the expectation that total sales for the fourth quarter of 2002 will be significantly below the fourth quarter of 2001 levels; the anticipation that Xicor will incur a loss in the fourth quarter of 2002; the expectation that the gross profit percentage will fluctuate from quarter to quarter as a result of changes in product mix, product costs and average selling prices; the expectation that the gross profit percentage in the fourth quarter of 2002 will improve slightly from 46% in the third quarter on reduced manufacturing costs and increased unit output; the plan and estimated costs to abandon our current facility and relocate to our new corporate headquarters in the fourth quarter of 2002, as well as the economic impact expected to result from such relocation; the plan to begin generating revenues from products developed using the in-process research and development acquired from AIP toward the end of 2003; the expectation that interest expense will increase in 2002 compared to 2001 as the convertible subordinated notes and warrants are expected to be outstanding for the full year; the expectation that interest income will decrease in the fourth quarter of 2002 compared to the fourth quarter of 2001 principally due to lower interest rates, the expectation to use cash in the fourth quarter of 2002; the projection that 2002 capital expenditures will approximate $1.0 million; and the expectation that currently available cash will be adequate to support operations for the next twelve months.

         Except for historical information, the matters discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those projected. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include the following; general economic conditions and conditions specific to the semiconductor industry; fluctuations in customer demand, including loss of key customers, order cancellations or reduced bookings; product mix; competitive factors such as pricing pressures on existing products and the timing and market acceptance of new product introductions (both by us and our competitors); our ability to have available an appropriate amount of low cost foundry production capacity in a timely manner; our foundry partners’ timely ability to successfully manufacture products for us using our proprietary technology; any disruptions of our foundry relationships; manufacturing efficiencies; the ability to continue effective cost reductions; currency fluctuations; the successful and timely development and introduction of new products and submicron processes; the timely completion of tenant

13

Table of Contents

improvements to the facility we plan to use as our new corporate headquarters and the timely exit from our current facility; and the risk factors listed from time to time in our SEC reports, including but not limited to the “Factors Affecting Future Results” section following and Part I, Item 1. of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly release or otherwise disclose the result of any revision to these forward-looking statements that may be made as a result of events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Factors Affecting Future Results

The risks described below are not the only ones facing our Company. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently believe are not material may also impair our business operations.

Our operating results fluctuate significantly, and an unanticipated decline in revenue may disappoint securities analysts or investors and result in a decline in our stock price.

You should not use our past financial performance to predict future operating results. We have incurred net losses in three of the last four years. Our recent quarterly and annual operating results have fluctuated, and will continue to fluctuate, due to the following factors, all of which are difficult to forecast and many of which are out of our control: the cyclical nature of both the semiconductor industry and the markets addressed by our products, including the current severe business down cycle; competitive pricing pressures and related changes in selling prices; new product announcements and introductions of competing products by us or our competitors; market acceptance and subsequent design-in of new products; unpredictability of changes in demand for, or in the mix of, our products; the timing of significant orders including the fact that the sales level in any specific quarter depends significantly on orders received during that quarter; the gain or loss of significant customers; the availability, timely deliverability and cost of products manufactured on our behalf by third-party suppliers; product obsolescence; lower of cost or market inventory adjustments; changes in the channels through which our products are distributed; exchange rate fluctuations; general economic, political and environmental-related conditions, such as natural disasters; difficulties in forecasting, planning and managing of inventory levels; and unanticipated research and development expenses associated with new product introductions.

The exit from a portion of our memory business has changed our business model and is causing a reduction in our revenues.

In the first quarter of 2001, we announced our plan to exit from offering stand-alone low-density serial EEPROM memory products. We have been unable to secure a buyer for the business, particularly in light of the current weak economic conditions, and plan to substantially complete our exit from that business in 2002.

The transition out of the serial EEPROM memory business has reduced our revenues and is requiring us to devote significant time and expense to transition activities at the same time we are increasing our focus on our mixed-signal products. If our penetration of the mixed-signal market does not increase, our operating results could be seriously harmed and our stock price could decline. Further, as a result of the transition, we have become a smaller company with limited

14

Table of Contents

resources and a reduced workforce. We may not be able to effectively use our limited resources to increase new product development and build our mixed-signal product business. This could cause a further decline in our revenues.

The selling prices for our products are volatile and have historically declined over the life of a product. In addition, the cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry produces fluctuations in our operating results.

The semiconductor industry has historically been cyclical, characterized by wide fluctuations in product supply and demand. From time to time, the industry has also experienced significant downturns, often in connection with, or in anticipation of, maturing product cycles and declines in general economic conditions. Downturns are generally characterized by diminished product demand, production over-capacity and accelerated decline of average selling prices, and in some cases have lasted for more than one year. We are presently experiencing an economic downturn that is harming our business. Our success depends on a better supply and demand balance within the industry and the various electronics industries that use semiconductors, including networking, communications and industrial companies, returning to more normal buying patterns.

We do not typically enter into long-term contracts with our customers and we cannot be certain as to future order levels from our customers.

The composition of our major customer base changes as the market demand for our customers’ products change. A small number of customers have accounted for a substantial portion of our sales. A reduction, delay, or cancellation of orders from a large customer could harm our business. The loss of, or reduced orders by, any of our key customers could result in a significant decline in our sales.

We depend on distributors and manufacturers’ representatives to generate a majority of our sales.

Distributors serve as a channel of sale to many end users of our products. Our distributors and manufacturers’ representatives could discontinue selling our products at any time. The loss of any significant distributor or manufacturers’ representative could seriously harm our operating results by impairing our ability to sell our products.

Our backlog may not result in future revenue, which would seriously harm our business.

Due to possible customer changes in delivery schedules and cancellations of orders, our backlog at any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any succeeding period. A reduction of backlog during any particular period, or the failure of our backlog to result in future revenue, could harm our business.

Our markets are subject to rapid technological change and, therefore, our success depends on our ability to develop and introduce new products.

The markets for our products are characterized by rapidly changing technologies; evolving and competing industry standards; changing customer needs; frequent new product introductions and enhancements; increased integration with other functions; and rapid product obsolescence.

15

Table of Contents

To develop new products for our target markets, we must develop, gain access to and use leading technologies in a cost-effective and timely manner and continue to expand our technical and design expertise. In addition, we must have our products designed into our customers’ future products and maintain close working relationships with key customers in order to develop new products that meet their rapidly changing needs.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to identify new product opportunities successfully, develop and bring to market new products at competitive costs, achieve design wins or respond effectively to new technological changes or product announcements by our competitors. Furthermore, we may not be successful in developing or using new technologies or in developing new products or product enhancements that achieve market acceptance. Our pursuit of necessary technological advances may require substantial time and expense. Failure in any of these areas could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our future success depends in part on the continued services of our key design, engineering, sales, marketing and executive personnel and our ability to identify, recruit and retain qualified personnel.

There is significant competition for qualified personnel in the semiconductor industry, in particular for the highly skilled engineers involved in the design and development of our mixed-signal products. At times competition has been especially intense in Silicon Valley, where our design, research and development, and corporate headquarters are located. The failure to recruit and retain key design engineers or other technical and management personnel would likely harm our business.

Our dependence on third-party foundries to manufacture our products and on subcontractors to sort, assemble and test our products and ship our products to customers subjects us to a number of risks.

We out-source all manufacturing operations. Our reliance on third-party foundries and subcontractors to manufacture, sort, assemble and test our products and to ship our products to customers involves the following significant risks:

	•		reduced control over delivery schedules and quality;
	•		the potential lack of adequate capacity during periods of strong demand;
	•		difficulties selecting and integrating new foundries and subcontractors;
	•		limited warranties by third-party manufacturers on products supplied to us; and
	•		potential increases in product costs due to capacity shortages and other factors.

These risks may lead to a possible loss of sales, increased costs, delayed product delivery or loss of competitive advantage, which would harm our profitability and customer relationships. Additionally, as we shift manufacturing of existing products between foundries and third-party subcontractors, certain customers require requalification of such products prior to accepting

16

Table of Contents

delivery. Delays in customer qualification schedules or lack of qualification of such products could result in the loss of sales, which could seriously harm our operating results.

Our operating expenses are relatively fixed, and we order materials in advance of anticipated customer demand. Therefore, we have limited ability to reduce expenses quickly in response to any revenue shortfalls.

Our operating expenses are relatively fixed, and we therefore have limited ability to reduce expenses quickly in response to any revenue shortfalls. Consequently, our operating results will be harmed if our sales do not meet our revenue projections. Revenue shortfalls can occur for any of the following reasons: economic slowdowns in the markets we serve; significant pricing pressures that occur because of declines in selling prices over the life of a product; the reduction, rescheduling or cancellation of customer orders; and sudden shortages of raw materials or fabrication, sort, test or assembly capacity constraints that lead our suppliers to allocate available supplies or capacity to other customers which, in turn, harms our ability to meet our sales obligations.

In addition, we typically plan our production and inventory levels based on internal forecasts of customer demand, which are highly unpredictable and can fluctuate substantially. From time to time, in response to anticipated long lead times to obtain inventory and materials from our outside suppliers and foundries, we order materials and produce finished products in advance of anticipated customer demand. This advance ordering and production has resulted in, and may continue to result in, excess inventory levels or inventory write-downs if expected orders fail to materialize or prices decrease substantially.

We presently have minimum wafer purchase commitments with a foundry that were made in exchange for a capacity commitment from them. Should demand for our products be less than the capacity commitment, we may be required to make payments for unused capacity which would cause our costs to increase.

Because our products typically have lengthy sales cycles, we may experience substantial delays between incurring expenses related to research and development and the generation of sales.

Due to the length of the product design-in cycle, we usually require more than nine months to realize volume shipments after a customer first samples our product. We first work with customers to achieve a design win, which may take three months or longer. Our customers then complete the design, testing and evaluation process and begin to ramp up production, a period which typically lasts an additional six months or longer. As a result, a significant period of time may elapse between our research and development efforts and our realization of revenue, if any, from volume purchasing of our products by our customers.

We face intense competition from companies with significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources that could adversely affect our ability to increase sales of our products.

We compete with major semiconductor companies such as Analog Devices, Atmel Corporation, Catalyst Semiconductor and Maxim, most of whom have substantially greater financial, technical, marketing, distribution, and other resources than we do and have their own facilities

17

Table of Contents

for the production of semiconductor components. In addition, our foundry partners have the right to develop and fabricate products based on our process technology.

From time to time, we may have to defend lawsuits in connection with the operation of our business.

We are subject to litigation in the ordinary course of our business. If we do not prevail in any lawsuit which may occur we could be subject to significant liability for damages, our patents and other proprietary rights could be invalidated, and we could be subject to injunctions preventing us from taking certain actions. If any of the above occur, our business and financial position could be harmed.

Our cost of sales may increase if we are required to purchase additional manufacturing capacity in the future.

To obtain additional manufacturing capacity in the future, we may be required to make deposits, equipment purchases and loans and enter into joint ventures, equity investments or technology licenses in or with wafer fabrication companies. These transactions could involve a commitment of substantial amounts of our capital and technology licenses in return for production capacity. We may be required to seek additional debt or equity financing in order to secure this capacity and we may not be able to obtain such financing.

Our ability to compete successfully will depend, in part, on our ability to protect our intellectual property rights, which we may not be able to do successfully.

We rely on a combination of patents, trade secrets, copyright and mask work production laws and rights, nondisclosure agreements and other contractual provisions and technical measures to protect our intellectual property rights. Our business, operating results and financial condition could be seriously harmed by the failure to be able to protect our intellectual property. Policing unauthorized use of our intellectual property, however, is difficult, especially in foreign countries. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets, to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others, or to defend against claims of infringement or invalidity. Litigation of this type can result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and can harm our business, operating results and financial condition regardless of the outcome of the litigation.

If Xicor or any of our foundries or third-party subcontractors is accused of infringing the intellectual property rights of other parties, we may become subject to time-consuming and costly litigation. If we lose or settle claims, we could suffer a significant negative impact on our business and be forced to pay royalties and damages.

Third parties have and may continue to assert that our products infringe their proprietary rights, or may assert claims for indemnification resulting from infringement claims against us. Any such claims may cause us to delay or cancel shipment of our products or pay royalties and damages that could seriously harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, irrespective of the validity or the successful assertion of such claims, we could incur significant costs in defending against such claims.

18

Table of Contents

We have received notices claiming infringement of patents from third parties with respect to certain aspects of our processes and devices, and these matters are under investigation and review. Although patent holders typically offer licenses and we have entered into such license agreements in the past, we may not be able to obtain licenses on acceptable terms, and disputes may not be resolved without costly litigation.

Our business may suffer due to risks associated with international sales and operations.

Sales outside of North America accounted for approximately 70% of total sales in the third quarter of 2002. Our international business activities are subject to a number of risks, any of which could impose unexpected costs on us that would have an adverse effect on our operating results. These risks include difficulties in complying with regulatory requirements and standards; tariffs and other trade barriers; costs and risks of localizing products for foreign countries; severe currency fluctuations and economic deflation; reliance on third parties to distribute our products; longer accounts receivable payment cycles; potentially adverse tax consequences; and burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws.

We may face interruption of production and services due to increased security measures in response to recent and potential future terrorist activities.

Our business depends on the free flow of products and services through the channels of commerce. During the past year, in response to terrorists’ activities and threats aimed at the United States, transportation, mail, financial and other services have at times been slowed or stopped altogether. Further delays or stoppages in transportation, mail, financial or other services, particularly any such delays or stoppages which harm our ability to obtain an adequate supply of wafers and products from our foreign foundries or contractors, could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, we may experience an increase in operating costs, such as costs for transportation, insurance and security as a result of the activities and potential activities. We may also experience delays in receiving payments from customers that have been affected by the terrorist activities and potential activities. The United States economy in general is being adversely affected by terrorist activities and potential terrorist activities. The economic downturn we are currently experiencing is adversely impacting our results of operations, and may impair our ability to raise capital or otherwise adversely affect our ability to grow our business. Moreover, we cannot determine whether other attacks may occur in the future and the effects of such attacks on our business could be severe.

Our November 2001 debt financing substantially increased our indebtedness which may make it more difficult to obtain financing in the future and cause our business to suffer.

As a result of our November 2001 sale of notes and warrants, we incurred $35 million of additional indebtedness. The level of our indebtedness, among other things, could make it difficult for us to obtain any necessary financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements or other purposes; limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to changes in, our business; and make us more vulnerable in the event of a downturn in our business. If any of these risks materialize, we may be unable to successfully execute our business plan.

19

Table of Contents

Our business could be harmed if the net proceeds from the November 2001 debt financing are used ineffectively.

We have flexibility in applying the net proceeds of the debt financing. We intend to use the proceeds of this offering for working capital and general corporate purposes. We may also use the proceeds for acquisitions, including acquisitions of intellectual property and design teams, such as our April 2002 acquisition of AIP. In addition, we may also use proceeds from the debt financing for research, development, sales and marketing and capital expenditures. The failure to apply these net proceeds effectively could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The conversion of our outstanding convertible debt and exercise of warrants issued in connection with our convertible debt may result in dilution to holders of our common stock and a reduction in the price of our common stock.

In November 2001 we issued $35 million in convertible notes and related warrants. The convertible notes enable the holders to convert principal amounts owed under the notes into an aggregate of approximately 3.1 million shares of common stock at a conversion price of $11.22 per share. In connection with the issuance of the convertible notes we also issued warrants for the purchase of approximately one million shares of common stock that are exercisable at a price of $12.24 per share. If the price of our common stock exceeds the conversion price of the notes and exercise price of the warrants, holders of the notes and warrants may convert the debt and exercise the warrants. We may force the conversion of all or a portion of the notes and warrants in certain circumstances. Our issuance of common stock at prices of $11.22 per share upon conversion of the debt and $12.24 per share upon exercise of the warrants may result in dilution to other holders of common stock and may cause the price of our common stock to fall. In addition, if note and warrant holders elect to sell the common stock issued upon the conversion of the debt and exercise of the warrants, the price of our common stock may fall.

We may require additional capital in order to bring new products to market, and the issuance of new equity securities will dilute your investment in our common stock.

To implement our strategy of diversified product offerings, we need to bring new products to market. Bringing new products to market and ramping up production requires significant working capital. We may sell additional shares of our stock or seek additional borrowings or outside capital infusions. We cannot assure you that such financing options will be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all. In addition, if we issue shares of our common stock, our shareholders will experience dilution of their investment.

We may fail to successfully integrate our business and technologies with those of the company that we recently acquired.

We completed our first acquisition, of AIP, in April 2002. If we fail to integrate this business successfully or properly, our quarterly and annual results may be seriously harmed. Integrating people, technology and services with our existing business could be expensive, time-consuming and a strain on our resources. Specific issues that we face with regard to our acquisition include the difficulty of integrating acquired technology, the potential disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of management, the failure to successfully develop acquired technology resulting in the impairment of amounts capitalized as intangible assets, unanticipated expenses related to

20

Table of Contents

technology integration and the potential unknown liabilities associated with the acquired business.

Business interruptions could harm our business.

Our operations and those of our foundries and other manufacturing subcontractors are vulnerable to interruption by fire, earthquake, power loss, telecommunications failure and other events beyond our control. Our facility in the State of California may be subject to electrical blackouts due to a shortage of available electrical power. If these blackouts were to occur, they could disrupt our operations. Business interruption insurance may not provide protection due to the deductible periods or be enough to compensate us for losses that may occur. Additionally, we have been unable to obtain earthquake insurance of reasonable costs and limits.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. We have an investment portfolio of fixed income securities that are classified as “available-for-sale securities.” These securities, like all fixed income instruments, are subject to interest rate risk and will fall in value if market interest rates increase. We attempt to limit this exposure by investing primarily in short-term securities. Due to the short duration and conservative nature of our investment portfolio a movement of 10% by market interest rates would not have a material impact on our operating results and the total value of the portfolio over the next fiscal year.

We are exposed to risks associated with foreign exchange rate fluctuations due to our international manufacturing and sales activities. We generally have not hedged currency exposures. These exposures may change over time as business practices evolve and could negatively impact our operating results and financial condition. All of our sales are denominated in U.S. dollars. An increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies could make our products more expensive and therefore reduce the demand for our products. Such a decline in the demand could reduce sales and/or result in operating losses.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

(a)

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

Our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, after evaluating our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) Rules 13a-14(c) and 15-d-14(c)) as of a date (the “Evaluation Date”) within 90 days before the filing date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q have concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

(b)

Changes in internal controls.

         Subsequent to the Evaluation Date, there were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect our disclosure controls and procedures,

21

Table of Contents

nor were there any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal controls. As a result, no corrective actions were required or undertaken.

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

Item 5. Other Information.

Xicor’s auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, provide Xicor with non-audit services in the nature of tax return preparation and tax assistance. The Audit Committee of Xicor’s Board of Directors has approved the performance of such services.

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

(a)		Exhibits:
		10.1		Xicor, Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan
		10.2		Building lease between WB Murphy Ranch, L.L.C. and Xicor, Inc. dated October 8, 2002
		99.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(b)		Reports on Form 8-K:
		No reports on Form 8-K were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission during the quarter ended September 29, 2002.

22

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

23

Table of Contents

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Louis DiNardo, certify that:

1.		I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Xicor, Inc.;
2.		Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3.		Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4.		The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

	a)		designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
	b)		evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
	c)		presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	a)		all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
	b)		any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.

The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

24

Table of Contents

I, Geraldine N. Hench, certify that:

1.		I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Xicor, Inc.;
2.		Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3.		Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4.		The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

	a)		designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
	b)		evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
	c)		presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	a)		all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
	b)		any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.

The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

25

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

26