Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ________ TO _________

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-23354

FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

MICHAEL E. MARKS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
36 ROBINSON ROAD #18-01
CITY HOUSE
SINGAPORE 068877
(65) 6299-8888
(NAME, ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE AND TELEPHONE NUMBER,
INCLUDING AREA CODE, OF AGENT FOR SERVICE)

     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X]     No [ ]

     At August 9, 2002, there were 516,720,149 ordinary shares, S$0.01 par value, outstanding.

Table of Contents

FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.

INDEX

2

Table of Contents

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS’ REPORT

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Flextronics International Ltd.

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Flextronics International Ltd. and subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) as of June 30, 2002, and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the three-month period then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and of making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2002, and for the three-month period then ended for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying condensed financial information as of March 31, 2002, and for the three-month period ended June 30, 2001, were not audited or reviewed by us and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on them.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Jose, California
July 19, 2002

3

Table of Contents

FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2002
(Unaudited)

Note A — BASIS OF PRESENTATION

     The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements, and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002 contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended June 30, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending March 31, 2003.

Note B — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

     All dollar amounts included in the financial statements are expressed in U.S. dollars unless otherwise designated as Singapore dollars (S$) or Euros (€).

     The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Flextronics and its wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries, after elimination of all significant intercompany accounts and transactions.

Reclassifications

     Certain prior year’s balances have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.

Use of Estimates

     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Translation of Foreign Currencies

     The financial position and results of operations of certain of the Company’s Chinese, Danish, Italian, Norwegian, Polish, Swedish, Swiss and UK subsidiaries are measured using their respective local currencies as the functional currency. Certain of the Company’s Austrian, Dutch, Finnish, French, German, Hungarian, Irish, Italian and Spanish subsidiaries have adopted the Euro as their functional currency. Accordingly, for these subsidiaries all assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at current exchange rates as of the respective balance sheet date. Revenue and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates prevailing during the period. Cumulative gains and losses from the translation of these subsidiaries’ financial statements are reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity.

Revenue Recognition

     The Company applies the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (“SAB 101”), “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.” SAB 101 provides guidance on applying accounting principles generally accepted in the United States to revenue recognition issues in financial statements.

7

Table of Contents

     The Company’s net sales are primarily comprised of manufacturing services, including the assembly of printed circuit boards, or PCBs, and complete systems and products, fabrication and assembly of plastic and metal enclosures, fabrication of PCBs and backplanes, and fabrication and assembly of photonics components. Throughout the production process, the Company offers other services, including design and technology; logistics, such as materials procurement, inventory management, vendor management, packaging, and distribution; and automation of key components of the supply chain through advanced information technologies. The Company offers after-market services such as repair and warranty services and network installation.

     Revenue from manufacturing services is generally recognized upon shipment of the manufactured product to our customers, under contractual terms, which are FOB shipping point. Revenue from other services and after-market services is recognized when the services have been performed. Title transfers upon shipment and the customer assumes risks and rewards of ownership of the product. Except in specific circumstances, there are no formal customer acceptance requirements or further Flextronics obligations subsequent to shipment. In specific circumstances in which there are such requirements or further Flextronics obligations, revenue is recognized at the point of said formal acceptance and upon completion of said obligations.

Property, Plant and Equipment

     Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets (one to thirty years), with the exception of building leasehold improvements, which are amortized over the life of the lease, if shorter. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

     The Company reviews property and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value. Recoverability of property and equipment is measured by comparing its carrying amount to projected discounted cash flows the property and equipment are expected to generate. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the property and equipment exceeds its fair value.

Income Taxes

     The Company provides for income taxes in accordance with the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences of “temporary differences” by applying the applicable statutory tax rate to the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities.

Goodwill and Other Intangibles

     In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 141 and No. 142, “Business Combinations” and “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” SFAS No. 141 requires all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for using the purchase method. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill is no longer subject to amortization over its estimated useful life. Rather, goodwill is subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment, applying a fair-value based test. Additionally, an acquired intangible asset should be separately recognized if the benefit of the intangible asset is obtained through contractual or other legal rights, or if the intangible asset can be sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged, regardless of the acquirer’s intent to do so. Other intangibles will continue to be valued and amortized over their estimated useful lives; in-process research and development will continue to be written off immediately.

     The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 in the first quarter of fiscal 2002 and no longer amortizes goodwill. The Company evaluates goodwill and other intangibles for impairment, at least on an annual basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable from its estimated future cash flows. Recoverability of goodwill is measured at the reporting unit level by comparing the reporting unit’s carrying amount, including goodwill, to the fair value of the reporting unit, based on projected discounted future results of the unit using a discount rate reflecting the Company’s average cost of funds. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill is considered impaired and a second test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. To date, the Company has not recognized any impairment of its goodwill and other intangible assets under SFAS No. 142. However, no assurances can be given that future evaluations of goodwill will not result in charges as a result of future impairment.

     The following table summarizes the activity in the Company’s goodwill account during the period (in thousands):

8

Table of Contents

     All of the Company’s acquired intangible assets are subject to amortization over their estimated useful lives. Intangible assets are comprised of contractual agreements, patents and trademarks, developed technologies and other acquired intangibles. Contractual agreements are being amortized over periods up to ten years. Patents and trademarks and developed technologies are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to ten years. Other acquired intangibles relate to favorable leases and customer lists, and are amortized on a straight-line basis over one to ten years. No residual value is estimated for the intangible assets. During the first three months of fiscal 2003, there were minimal additions to intangible assets, primarily related to purchased patents and other acquired intangibles. Currently, the Company is in the process of determining the value of its intangible assets acquired from its acquisition of The Orbiant Group in fiscal 2002. Intangible assets amortization for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and June 30, 2001 was approximately $3.2 million and $2.3 million, respectively. The components of intangible assets are as follows (in thousands):

     Expected future estimated annual amortization expense is as follows (in thousands):

* Represents nine-month period ending March 31, 2003.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

     On April 1, 2001, the Company adopted SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended by SFAS No. 137 and No. 138. All derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. If the derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recorded in shareholders’ equity as a separate component of accumulated comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”) and is recognized in the statement of operations when the hedged item affects earnings. Ineffective portions of changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges are immediately recognized in earnings. If the derivative is designated as a fair value hedge, the changes in the fair value of the derivative and of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in earnings in the current period.

     The Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk inherent in forecasted sales, cost of sales and assets and liabilities denominated in non-functional currencies. The Company has established currency risk management programs to protect against reductions in value and volatility of future cash flows caused by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company enters into short-term foreign currency forward contracts to hedge only those currency exposures associated with certain assets and liabilities, mainly accounts receivable and accounts payable, and cash flows denominated in non-functional currencies.

     As of June 30, 2002, the fair value of these short-term foreign currency forward contracts was recorded as a liability amounting to $64,000. At the same date the Company had in OCI recorded immaterial deferred gains relating to our foreign currency forward

9

Table of Contents

contracts. These gains are expected to be recognized in earnings over the next twelve months. The gains and losses recognized in earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness were immaterial.

Trade Receivables Securitization

     In September 2000, the FASB issued SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 125.” The new standard carries forward some provisions of SFAS No. 125, but modifies the methods of accounting for securitizations and other transfers of financial assets and collateral, in addition to requiring additional disclosures. The Company adopted SFAS No. 140 in the first quarter of fiscal 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 140 did not have a material impact on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

     In March 2002, the Company entered into a receivables securitization agreement and sold a designated pool of qualified trade receivables to a third party qualified special purpose entity, which in turn sold an undivided ownership interest to a conduit, administrated by an unaffiliated financial institution. The agreement, which expires in March 2003, is subject to annual renewal and has a current maximum limit of $250.0 million. The Company sold $226.5 million of its accounts receivables during the first quarter of fiscal 2003 and received net cash proceeds of $131.3 million during the same period. The Company has a recourse obligation that is limited to its investment and 5% of the total sold receivables or $85.4 million and $10.3 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2002. The accounts receivable balances that were sold were removed from the consolidated balance sheet and the proceeds received from the sale are reflected as cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

Note C — INVENTORIES

     Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out basis) or market value. Cost is comprised of direct materials, labor and overhead. Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):

Note D — UNUSUAL CHARGES

Fiscal 2003

     The Company recognized unusual pre-tax charges of approximately $207.8 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2003, of which $200.4 million related to the closures and consolidations of various manufacturing facilities and $7.4 million for the impairment of investments in certain technology companies. As further discussed below, $179.4 million of the charges relating to facility closures have been classified as a component of cost of sales.

     Unusual charges recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 by reportable geographic regions were as follows: Americas, $101.7 million; Asia, $8.7 million; and Europe, $97.4 million.

     The components of the unusual charges recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 were as follows (in thousands):

10

Table of Contents

     In connection with the facility closures in the June 2002 quarter, the Company developed formal plans to exit certain activities and involuntarily terminate employees. Management’s plan to exit an activity included the identification of duplicate manufacturing and administrative facilities for closure or consolidation into other facilities. Management currently anticipates that the facility closures and activities to which all of these charges relate will be substantially completed within one year of the commitment dates of the respective exit plans, except for certain long-term contractual obligations.

     Of the total pre-tax facility closure costs recorded in the June 2002 quarter, $76.9 million related to employee termination costs, of which $59.6 million has been classified as a component of cost of sales. As a result of the various exit plans, the Company identified 5,261 employees to be involuntarily terminated in connection with the various facility closures and consolidations. As of June 30, 2002, 856 employees had been terminated, and another 4,405 employees had been notified that they are to be terminated upon completion of the various facility closures and consolidations.

     The unusual pre-tax charges recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 included $55.3 million for the write-down of property, plant and equipment associated with various manufacturing and administrative facility closures from their carrying value of $78.6 million. This amount has been classified as a component of cost of sales during the June 2002 quarter. Also included in long-lived asset impairment is approximately $1.0 million for the write-off of goodwill. Certain assets will be held for use and remain in service until their anticipated disposal dates pursuant to the exit plans. For assets being held for use, impairment is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the asset. The fair value of assets held for use was determined based on projected discounted cash flows of the asset using a discount rate reflecting the Company’s average cost of funds. Certain other assets will be held for disposal as these assets are no longer required in operations. Assets held for disposal are no longer being depreciated. For assets being held for disposal, an impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value less cost to sell. The impaired long-lived assets resulted in write-downs of machinery and equipment of $48.2 million and building and improvements of $7.1 million.

     The unusual pre-tax charges also included approximately $67.2 million for other exit costs. Approximately $64.5 million of this amount has been classified as a component of cost of sales. Other exit costs included contractual obligations totaling $50.3 million, which were incurred directly as a result of the various exit plans. The contractual obligations consisted of facility lease terminations amounting to $28.6 million, equipment lease terminations amounting to $10.3 million and payments to suppliers and third parties to terminate contractual agreements amounting to $11.4 million. The Company expects to make payments associated with its contractual obligations with respect to facility and equipment leases through the end of fiscal 2011 and with respect to the other contractual obligations with suppliers and third parties through the end of fiscal 2004. Other exit costs also included charges of $9.9 million relating to asset impairments resulting from customer contracts that were breached when they were terminated by the Company as a result of various facility closures. These asset impairments were determined based on the difference between the carrying amount and the realizable value of the impaired inventory and accounts receivable. The Company intends to dispose of the impaired assets, primarily through scrapping and write-offs. The Company expects all disposals to be completed by the end of fiscal 2003. Other exit costs also included $4.3 million of facility refurbishment and abandonment costs related to certain building repair work necessary to prepare the exited facilities for sale or to return the facilities to their respective landlords. The remaining $2.7 million primarily included incremental amounts of legal and consulting costs, and various government obligations for which the Company is liable for as a direct result of its facility closures.

Fiscal 2002

     The Company recognized unusual pre-tax charges of approximately $574.4 million during fiscal 2002, of which $530.0 million related to closures of several manufacturing facilities and $44.4 million was primarily for the impairment of investments in certain technology companies. As further discussed below, $464.4 million of the charges relating to facility closures have been classified as a component of cost of sales.

     Unusual charges recorded in fiscal 2002 by reportable geographic regions were as follows: Americas, $265.8 million; Asia, $70.7 million; and Europe, $237.9 million.

     The components of the unusual charges recorded in fiscal 2002 were as follows (in thousands):

11

Table of Contents

     In connection with the facility closures in fiscal 2002, the Company developed formal plans to exit certain activities and involuntarily terminate employees. Management’s plan to exit an activity included the identification of duplicate manufacturing and administrative facilities for closure or consolidation into other facilities. Management currently anticipates that the facility closures and activities to which all of these charges relate will be substantially completed within one year of the commitment dates of the respective exit plans, except for certain long-term contractual obligations.

     Of the total pre-tax facility closure costs recorded in fiscal 2002, $153.6 million related to employee termination costs, of which $118.4 million has been classified as a component of cost of sales. As a result of the various exit plans, the Company identified 13,391 employees to be involuntarily terminated in connection with the various facility closures and consolidations. As of June 30, 2002, 8,403 employees had been terminated, and another 4,988 employees had been notified that they are to be terminated upon completion of the various facility closures and consolidations.

     The unusual pre-tax charges recorded in fiscal 2002 included $163.7 million for the write-down of property, plant and equipment associated with various manufacturing and administrative facility closures from their carrying value of $232.6 million. This amount has been classified as a component of cost of sales during fiscal 2002. Certain assets will be held for use and remain in service until their anticipated disposal dates pursuant to the exit plans. Since the assets will remain in service from the date of the decision to dispose of these assets to the anticipated disposal date, the assets are being depreciated over this expected period. For assets being held for use, an impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value. Certain other assets will be held for disposal as these assets are no longer required in operations. Assets held for disposal are no longer being depreciated. For assets being held for disposal, an impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value less cost to sell. The impaired long-lived assets resulted in write-downs of machinery and equipment of $105.7 million and building and improvements of $58.0 million.

     The unusual pre-tax charges, also included approximately $212.7 million for other exit costs. Approximately $182.3 million of this amount has been classified as a component of cost of sales. Other exit costs included contractual obligations totaling $61.6 million, which were incurred directly as a result of the various exit plans. The contractual obligations consisted of facility lease terminations amounting to $27.2 million, equipment lease terminations amounting to $13.2 million and payments to suppliers and third parties to terminate contractual agreements amounting to $21.2 million. The Company expects to make payments associated with its contractual obligations with respect to facility and equipment leases through the end of fiscal 2007 and with respect to the other contractual obligations with suppliers and third parties through the end of fiscal 2003. Other exit costs also included charges of $98.0 million relating to asset impairments resulting from customer contracts that were breached when they were terminated by the Company as a result of various facility closures. These asset impairments were determined based on the difference between the carrying amount and the realizable value of the impaired inventory and accounts receivable. The Company disposed of the impaired assets, primarily through scrapping and write-offs, by the end of fiscal 2002. Also included in other exit costs were charges amounting to $8.0 million for the incremental costs for warranty work incurred by the Company for products sold prior to the commitment dates of the various exit plans. Other exit costs also included $8.2 million of facility refurbishment and abandonment costs related to certain building repair work necessary to prepare the exited facilities for sale or to return the facilities to their respective landlords. The remaining $36.9 million, primarily included incremental amounts of legal and environmental costs, and various government obligations liable by the Company as a direct result of its facility closures.

Fiscal 2001

     The Company recognized unusual pre-tax charges of approximately $973.3 million during fiscal 2001. Of this amount $510.5 million of the charges were recorded as a component of cost of sales in fiscal 2001. Of this amount, $301.2 million was for merger related costs for various pooling of interests acquisitions consummated in fiscal 2001, $376.1 million related to the closures of several manufacturing facilities, $286.5 million related to the issuance of an equity instrument to Motorola and $9.5 million was for the impairment of investments in certain technology companies.

12

Table of Contents

     As of June 30, 2002, the Company had utilized substantially all of the unusual charges provisioned for in fiscal 2001. The balances remaining primarily relate to long-term contractual obligations for severance and facility closure costs, which will be completed by the end of fiscal 2005.

     The following table summarizes the balance of the accrued facility closure costs as June 30, 2002 and the type and amount of closure costs provisioned for and utilized during the first quarter of fiscal 2003.

Note E — EARNINGS PER SHARE

     Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the applicable periods.

     Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of ordinary shares and dilutive ordinary share equivalents outstanding during the applicable periods. Ordinary share equivalents include ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and other equity instruments, and are computed using the treasury stock method.

     Earnings per share data were computed as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):

13

Table of Contents

Note F — COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

     The following table summarizes the components of comprehensive income (loss) (in thousands):

Note G — BUSINESS COMBINATIONS AND PURCHASES OF ASSETS

     In October 2001, the Company announced a manufacturing agreement with Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”). The Company acquired Xerox’s manufacturing operations in Aguascalientes, Mexico; El Segundo, California; Penang, Malaysia; Resende, Brazil; Toronto, Canada and Venray, Netherlands. In connection with the acquisition, the Company purchased certain assets totaling $175.1 million, of which approximately $10.0 million was paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2003. The Company estimates that less than $10.0 million of assets remain to be purchased in the second quarter of fiscal 2003. Additionally, the Company entered into a five-year agreement for the manufacture of certain Xerox office equipment and components. The acquisition was accounted for by the purchase method of accounting. Comparative proforma financial information related to Xerox is not provided as the results of the acquired operations were not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements on either an individual or an aggregate basis.

     In May 2002, the Company entered into a definitive contract manufacturing agreement with Casio Computer Co., Ltd. (“Casio”), a leading global consumer electronics company. The agreement includes the purchase of Casio’s manufacturing operations in Shah Alam, Malaysia and Aichi, Japan (excluding land and building) for an estimated purchase price of $42.0 million. Additionally, the Company will acquire certain equipment from Casio’s factory in Kluang, Johor, Malaysia. The value of the agreement is estimated at about $1.5 billion over a three-year period. The transaction is expected to close at the end of August 2002. The acquisition will be accounted for by the purchase method of accounting.

     In May 2002, the Company made an offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares of NatSteel Broadway Ltd. (“NatSteel Broadway”), an electronics manufacturing company headquartered in Singapore. The offer, priced at S$3.23 cash per share, equates to a deal value of approximately S$653 million or approximately $371 million. NatSteel Broadway’s operations include manufacturing facilities in China and Hungary. The acquisition is expected to be completed in August 2002. The acquisition will be accounted for by the purchase method of accounting.

     Additionally, during the first quarter of fiscal 2003, the Company increased goodwill in the amount of approximately $33.4 million for contingent purchase price adjustments and other adjustments for certain historical acquisitions, which included the issuance of 821,640 ordinary shares.

Note H — GEOGRAPHIC REPORTING

     Geographic information is as follows (in thousands):

14

Table of Contents

     For purposes of the preceding tables, “Asia” includes China, India, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan and Thailand, “Americas” includes Brazil, Canada, Mexico and the United States, “Europe” includes Austria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Scotland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.

Note I — NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Asset Retirement Obligations

     In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” to be effective for all fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002, with early adoption permitted. SFAS No. 143 establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of an asset retirement obligation and its associated asset retirement cost. It also provides accounting guidance for legal obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 143 in fiscal 2004. The Company does not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 143 will have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Long-Lived Asset Impairment

     In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” SFAS No. 144 supercedes SFAS No. 121 and requires that one accounting model be used for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, whether previously held and used or newly acquired and by broadening the presentation of discontinued operations to include more disposal transactions. The Company adopted SFAS No. 144 in the first quarter of fiscal 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Exit or Disposal Activities

     In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” which addresses accounting for restructuring and similar costs. SFAS No. 146 supersedes previous accounting guidance, principally Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity.” SFAS No. 146 requires that the liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under Issue No. 94-3, a liability for an exit cost was recognized at the date of the Company’s commitment to an exit plan. SFAS No. 146 also establishes that the liability should initially be measured and recorded at fair value. Accordingly, SFAS No. 146 may affect the timing of recognizing future restructuring costs as well as the amounts recognized. The Company will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 146 for restructuring activities initiated after December 31, 2002.

Extinguishment of Debt and Sale-Leaseback Transactions

     In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections”. SFAS No. 145 rescinds SFAS No. 4, which required all gains and losses from

15

Table of Contents

extinguishment of debt to be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item, net of related income tax effect. As a result, the criteria in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30, “Reporting the Results of Operations — Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions,” will now be used to classify those gains and losses. Any gain or loss on extinguishment of debt that was classified as an extraordinary item in prior periods presented that does not meet the criteria in Opinion 30 for classification as an extraordinary item shall be reclassified. SFAS No. 145 also amends SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases,” to require that certain lease modifications that have economic effects similar to sale-leaseback transactions be accounted for in the same manner as sale-leaseback transactions. The Company will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 145 related to the rescission of Statement No. 4 in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. The Company does not believe the adoption of these provisions will have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The provisions in paragraphs 8 and 9(c) of SFAS No. 145 related to Statement No. 13 are required to be effective for transactions occurring after May 15, 2002 and thus the Company has adopted these provisions. The adoption of these provisions did not have any impact on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     This report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The words “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “plans” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements which refer to expectations, projections or other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly disclose any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring subsequent to filing this Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, those discussed below in “Certain Factors Affecting Operating Results.” Accordingly, our future results may differ materially from historical results or from those discussed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

     We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. For further discussion of our significant accounting policies, refer to Note 2, “Summary of Accounting Policies,” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002. See also the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this report on Form 10-Q.

Long-Lived Assets

     We review property and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” an impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value. Recoverability of property and equipment is measured by comparing its carrying amount to projected discounted cash flows the property and equipment are expected to generate. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the property and equipment exceeds its fair value.

     In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” we evaluate goodwill and other intangibles for impairment, on at least an annual basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable from its estimated future cash flows. Recoverability of goodwill is measured at the reporting unit level by comparing the reporting unit’s carrying amount, including goodwill, to the fair value of the reporting unit, based on projected discounted future results of the unit using a discount rate reflecting our average cost of funds. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill is considered impaired and a second test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. To date, we have not recognized any impairment of our goodwill and other intangible assets in connection with our adoption of SFAS 142. However, no assurances can be given that future evaluations of goodwill will not result in charges as a result of future impairment.

16

Table of Contents

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

     We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition and make provisions for doubtful accounts based on the outcome of our credit valuations. We evaluate the collectibility of our accounts receivable based on specific customer circumstances, current economic trends, historical experience with collections and the age of past due receivables. Unanticipated changes in the liquidity or financial position of our customers may require additional provisions for doubtful accounts.

Inventory Valuation

     Our inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out basis) or market value. Our industry is characterized by rapid technological change, short-term customer commitments and rapid changes in demand, as well as any other lower of cost or market considerations. We make provisions for estimated excess and obsolete inventory based on our regular reviews of inventory quantities on hand and the latest forecasts of product demand and production requirements from our customers. If actual market conditions or our customers’ product demands are less favorable than those projected, additional provisions may be required.

Exit Costs

     We recognized unusual charges in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 and in fiscals 2002 and 2001, related to our plans to exit certain activities resulting from the identification of duplicate manufacturing and administrative facilities for closure or consolidation. In connection with our exit activities, we recorded unusual charges for employee termination costs, long-lived asset impairment and other exit-related costs. These charges were incurred pursuant to formal plans developed by management and a liability for the exit costs is recognized at the date of our commitment to the exit plans in accordance with the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity.” The recognition of the unusual charges required that we make certain judgments and estimates regarding the nature, timing and amount of costs associated with the planned exit activity. The estimates of future liabilities may change, requiring the recording of additional unusual charges or the reduction of liabilities already recorded. At the end of each reporting period, we evaluate the remaining accrued balances to ensure that no excess accruals are retained and the utilization of the provisions are for their intended purpose in accordance with developed exit plans.

     In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” which addresses accounting for restructuring and similar costs. SFAS No. 146 supersedes previous accounting guidance, principally Issue No. 94-3. SFAS No. 146 requires that the liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred and not at the date of our commitment to the exit plan. Accordingly, SFAS No. 146 may affect the timing of recognizing future restructuring costs as well as the amounts recognized. We will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 146 for restructuring activities initiated after December 31, 2002.

     Refer to Note D, “Unusual Charges,” of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of our restructuring activities.

Deferred Income Taxes

     Our deferred tax assets represent temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amount and the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities that will result in deductible amounts in future years, including net operating loss carryforwards. Based on estimates, the carrying value of our net deferred tax assets assumes that it is more likely than not that we will be able to generate sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions. Our judgments regarding future profitability may change due to future market conditions, changes in U.S. or international tax laws and other factors. If these estimates and related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to increase our valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets resulting in additional income tax expense.

ACQUISITIONS AND STRATEGIC CUSTOMER TRANSACTIONS

     We have actively pursued business acquisitions and strategic transactions with customers to expand our global reach, manufacturing capacity and service offerings and to diversify and strengthen customer relationships.

     We have made a number of acquisitions and strategic customer transactions which we accounted for using the purchase method. Accordingly, our consolidated financial statements include the operating results of each business from the date of acquisition.

17

Table of Contents

Proforma results of operations have not been presented because the effects of these acquisitions were not material on either an individual or an aggregated basis.

     Prior to June 30, 2001, we also completed various acquisitions, which were accounted for as pooling of interests and our consolidated financial statements have been restated to reflect the combined operations of the merged companies for all periods presented. We also completed other immaterial pooling of interests transactions, for which prior period statements had not been restated. In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” SFAS No. 141 requires all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for using the purchase method.

     For additional information on our recent acquisitions and strategic customer transactions, please see Note G, “Business Combinations and Purchases of Assets,” of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain statements of operations data expressed as a percentage of net sales.

Net Sales

     We derive our net sales from the assembly of printed circuit boards, or PCBs, and complete systems and products, fabrication and assembly of plastic and metal enclosures, fabrication of PCBs and backplanes, and fabrication and assembly of photonics components. Throughout the production process, we offer design and technology services; logistics services, such as materials procurement, inventory management, vendor management, packaging, and distribution; and automation of key components of the supply chain through advanced information technologies. We offer other after-market services such as repair and warranty services and network and communications installation and maintenance.

     Net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 remained relatively flat compared to the same quarter a year ago, increasing less than 1% to $3.13 billion from $3.11 billion. Our ten largest customers in the first three months of fiscal 2003 accounted for approximately 72% of net sales, with Hewlett-Packard Company and Sony-Ericsson accounting for 13% and 11% of net sales, respectively. In the first quarter of fiscal 2002, our ten largest customers accounted for approximately 62% of net sales with Ericsson accounting for 23% of net sales. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of net sales during these periods. We continue to experience weakness in customer demand, particularly in the information technology and communications infrastructure segments, as a consequence of the continuing downturn in economic conditions worldwide. However, this continued weakness in our customers’ demand has been offset by contract wins with new and existing customers combined with revenues from our recent acquisitions. The mix of our net sales has changed when compared to the same quarter a year ago, as revenues from computers and office automation and consumer markets have increased significantly, primarily due to revenues associated with our acquisition of several of Xerox Corporation’s manufacturing operations combined with new contracts with Hewlett-Packard for the production of ink-jet printers (office automation products) and our dominant supplier levels of production of the Xbox consumer gaming product for Microsoft Corporation. Additionally, revenues associated with purchases of manufacturing facilities and related assets from OEMs that occurred in the last three quarters of fiscal 2002 contributed to incremental revenues in the current quarter.

18

Table of Contents

Gross Profit

     Gross profit varies from period to period and is affected by a number of factors, including product mix, component costs and availability, product life cycles, unit volumes, startup, expansion and consolidation of manufacturing facilities, capacity utilization, pricing, competition and new product introductions.

     Gross margin for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 decreased to (0.4%) from 7.5% in the same quarter a year ago. Excluding the unusual pre-tax charges of $179.4 million in the current quarter, gross margin decreased to 5.3%.

     The decrease in our gross margin was the result of several factors, primarily, (i) under-absorbed fixed costs caused by under utilization of capacity, most significantly experienced by our printed circuit board fabrication unit, resulting in part from the continued decline in our customers’ markets, especially the high-end telecom market, (ii) costs associated with accelerated transfers of customer programs to low-cost locations, (iii) product mix movement towards higher volume printed circuit board assembly projects and final system assembly projects, which typically have a lower gross margin and (iv) industry pricing pressures resulting from the economic downturn. The decrease was partially offset by our current and historical restructuring activities and cost containment efforts.

     Increased mix of products that have relatively high material costs as a percentage of total unit costs has historically been a factor that has adversely affected our gross margins. We believe that these and other factors may adversely affect our gross margins, but we do not expect that this will have a material effect on our income from operations.

Unusual Charges

Fiscal 2003

     We recognized unusual pre-tax charges of approximately $207.8 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2003, of which $200.4 million related to the closures and consolidations of various manufacturing facilities and $7.4 million for the impairment of investments in certain technology companies. As further discussed below, $179.4 million of the charges relating to facility closures have been classified as a component of cost of sales.

     Unusual charges recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 by reportable geographic regions were as follows: Americas, $101.7 million; Asia, $8.7 million; and Europe, $97.4 million.

     The components of the unusual charges recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 were as follows (in thousands):

     In connection with the facility closures in the June 2002 quarter, we developed formal plans to exit certain activities and involuntarily terminate employees. Management’s plan to exit an activity included the identification of duplicate manufacturing and administrative facilities for closure or consolidation into other facilities. Management currently anticipates that the facility closures and activities to which all of these charges relate will be substantially completed within one year of the commitment dates of the respective exit plans, except for certain long-term contractual obligations.

     Of the total pre-tax facility closure costs recorded in the June 2002 quarter, $76.9 million related to employee termination costs, of which $59.6 million has been classified as a component of cost of sales. As a result of the various exit plans, we identified 5,261 employees to be involuntarily terminated related in connection with the various facility closures and consolidations. As of June 30, 2002, 856 employees had been terminated, and another 4,405 employees had been notified that they are to be terminated upon completion of the various facility closures and consolidations.

19

Table of Contents

     The unusual pre-tax charges recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 included $55.3 million for the write-down of property, plant and equipment associated with various manufacturing and administrative facility closures from their carrying value of $78.6 million. This amount has been classified as a component of cost of sales during the June 2002 quarter. Also included in long-lived asset impairment is approximately $1.0 million for the write-off of goodwill. Certain assets will be held for use and remain in service until their anticipated disposal dates pursuant to the exit plans. For assets being held for use, impairment is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the asset. The fair value of assets held for use was determined based on projected discounted cash flows of the asset using a discount rate reflecting the our average cost of funds. Certain other assets will be held for disposal as these assets are no longer required in operations. Assets held for disposal are no longer being depreciated. Assets held for disposal are no longer being depreciated. For assets being held for disposal, an impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value less cost to sell. The impaired long-lived assets consisted of machinery and equipment of $48.2 million and building and improvements of $7.1 million.

     The unusual pre-tax charges also included approximately $67.2 million for other exit costs. Approximately $64.5 million of this amount has been classified as a component of cost of sales. Other exit costs included contractual obligations totaling $50.3 million, which were incurred directly as a result of the various exit plans. The contractual obligations consisted of facility lease terminations amounting to $28.6 million, equipment lease terminations amounting to $10.3 million and payments to suppliers and third parties to terminate contractual agreements amounting to $11.4 million. We expect to make payments associated with our contractual obligations with respect to facility and equipment leases through the end of fiscal 2011 and with respect to the other contractual obligations with suppliers and third parties through the end of fiscal 2004. Other exit costs also included charges of $9.9 million relating to asset impairments resulting from customer contracts that were breached when they were terminated by us as a result of various facility closures. These asset impairments were determined based on the difference between the carrying amount and the realizable value of the impaired inventory and accounts receivable. We intend to dispose of the impaired assets, primarily through scrapping and write-offs. We expect all disposals to be completed by the end of fiscal 2003. Other exit costs also included $4.3 million of facility refurbishment and abandonment costs related to certain building repair work necessary to prepare the exited facilities for sale or to return the facilities to their respective landlords. The remaining $2.7 million primarily included incremental amounts of legal and consulting costs, and various government obligations for which we are liable for as a direct result of its facility closures.

     We believe that the potential cost of goods savings achieved through lower depreciation and reduced employee expense will be offset by reduced revenues at the affected facilities.

Fiscal 2002

     We recognized unusual pre-tax charges of approximately $574.4 million during fiscal 2002, of which $530.0 million related to closures of several manufacturing facilities and $44.4 million was primarily for the impairment of investments in certain technology companies. As further discussed below, $464.4 million of the charges relating to facility closures have been classified as a component of cost of sales.

     Unusual charges recorded in fiscal 2002 by reportable geographic regions were as follows: Americas, $265.8 million; Asia, $70.7 million; and Europe, $237.9 million.

     The components of the unusual charges recorded in fiscal 2002 were as follows (in thousands):

     In connection with the facility closures in fiscal 2002, we developed formal plans to exit certain activities and involuntarily terminate employees. Management’s plan to exit an activity included the identification of duplicate manufacturing and administrative facilities for closure or consolidation into other facilities. Management currently anticipates that the facility closures and activities to

20

Table of Contents

which all of these charges relate will be substantially completed within one year of the commitment dates of the respective exit plans, except for certain long-term contractual obligations.

     Of the total pre-tax facility closure costs recorded in fiscal 2002, $153.6 million related to employee termination costs, of which $118.4 million has been classified as a component of cost of sales. As a result of the various exit plans, we identified 13,391 employees to be involuntarily terminated in connection with the various facility closures and consolidations. As of June 30, 2002, 8,403 employees had been terminated, and another 4,988 employees had been notified that they are to be terminated upon completion of the various facility closures and consolidations.

     The unusual pre-tax charges recorded in fiscal 2002 included $163.7 million for the write-down of property, plant and equipment associated with various manufacturing and administrative facility closures from their carrying value of $232.6 million. This amount has been classified as a component of cost of sales during fiscal 2002. Certain assets will be held for use and remain in service until their anticipated disposal dates pursuant to the exit plans. Since the assets will remain in service from the date of the decision to dispose of these assets to the anticipated disposal date, the assets are being depreciated over this expected period. For assets being held for use, an impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value. Certain other assets will be held for disposal as these assets are no longer required in operations. Assets held for disposal are no longer being depreciated. For assets being held for disposal, an impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value less cost to sell. The impaired long-lived assets consisted of machinery and equipment of $105.7 million and building and improvements of $58.0 million.

     The unusual pre-tax charges also included approximately $212.7 million for other exit costs. Approximately $182.3 million of this amount has been classified as a component of cost of sales. Other exit costs included contractual obligations totaling $61.6 million, which were incurred directly as a result of the various exit plans. The contractual obligations consisted of facility lease terminations amounting to $27.2 million, equipment lease terminations amounting to $13.2 million and payments to suppliers and third parties to terminate contractual agreements amounting to $21.2 million. We expect to make payments associated with our contractual obligations with respect to facility and equipment leases through the end of fiscal 2007 and with respect to the other contractual obligations with suppliers and third parties through the end of fiscal 2003. Other exit costs also included charges of $98.0 million relating to asset impairments resulting from customer contracts that were breached when they were terminated by us as a result of various facility closures. These asset impairments were determined based on the difference between the carrying amount and the realizable value of the impaired inventory and accounts receivable. We disposed of the impaired assets, primarily through scrapping and write-offs, by the end of fiscal 2002. Also included in other exit costs were charges amounting to $8.0 million for the incremental costs for warranty work incurred by us for products sold prior to the commitment dates of the various exit plans. Other exit costs also included $8.2 million of facility refurbishment and abandonment costs related to certain building repair work necessary to prepare the exited facilities for sale or to return the facilities to their respective landlords. The remaining $36.9 million primarily included incremental amounts of legal and environmental costs, and various government obligations liable by us as a direct result of our facility closures.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

     Selling, general and administrative expenses, or SG&A for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 increased to $114.7 million from $108.8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2002. As a percentage of sales, SG&A increased slightly to 3.7% from 3.5% in the same quarter a year ago. The absolute dollar increase in SG&A was primarily driven by various business acquisitions completed in the latter half of fiscal 2002. In particular, the expansion of our network services business through our acquisition of The Orbiant Group has contributed to the increase as this segment carries significantly higher SG&A costs. The increase was offset somewhat by our continued expense management and efficiencies gained from our current and historical restructuring activities.

Intangibles Amortization

     Intangibles amortization for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 increased to $3.2 million from $2.3 million in the year ago quarter. The increase was primarily driven by approximately $33.7 million of additions to intangible assets in fiscal 2002, primarily a result of various acquisitions completed during the same period.

Interest and Other Expense, Net

     Interest and other expense, net was $19.0 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 compared to $22.4 million for the corresponding quarter of fiscal 2002. The decrease in interest and other expense, net was driven primarily by reduced outstanding borrowings and higher invested cash balances offset by reduced gains on sales of marketable securities.

21

Table of Contents

Provision for Income Taxes

     Certain of our subsidiaries have, at various times, been granted tax relief in their respective countries, resulting in lower income taxes than would otherwise be the case under ordinary tax rates.

     Our consolidated effective tax rate was a benefit of 26% and an expense of 10% for the first three months of fiscal years 2003 and 2002, respectively. Excluding the unusual charges, the effective income tax rate was 11% and 10% for the first quarter of fiscal years 2003 and 2002, respectively. The consolidated effective tax rate for a particular period varies depending on the amount of earnings from different jurisdictions, operating loss carryforwards, income tax credits, changes in previously established valuation allowances for deferred tax assets based upon management’s current analysis of the realizability of these deferred tax assets, as well as certain tax holidays and incentives granted to us and our subsidiaries in China, Hungary and Malaysia.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

     As of June 30, 2002, we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $827.0 million, total bank and other debts totaling $1.0 billion and $800.0 million available for future borrowing under our credit facility subject to compliance with certain financial covenants.

     Cash provided by operating activities was $297.7 million and $383.5 million in the first three months of fiscals 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities in the June 2002 quarter was primarily due our recording a net loss in the current quarter of approximately $131.7 million as compared to a net income of $88.3 million in the same quarter a year ago. This was offset by reductions in accounts receivable and increases in accounts payable during the quarter.

     Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts was $1.7 billion and $1.9 billion as of June 30, 2002 and March 31, 2002, respectively. The decrease in accounts receivable was primarily attributable to the sequential revenue decline from the preceding quarter of approximately $169.3 million.

     Inventories decreased less than 1% to $1.28 billion at June 30, 2002 from $1.29 billion at March 31, 2002. The slight reduction was primarily a result of declining production requirements.

     Cash used in investing activities was $101.6 million and $423.3 million for the first three months of fiscals 2003 and 2002, respectively. Cash used in investing activities during the first quarter of fiscal 2003 primarily related to (i) net capital expenditures of $54.4 million to purchase equipment and for continued expansion of manufacturing facilities, (ii) payment of $33.2 million primarily related to our participation in the asset securitization agreement entered into in March 2002 and (iii) payment of $12.1 million for acquisitions of businesses.

     Cash used in investing activities for the first three months of fiscal 2002 consisted of (i) net capital expenditures of $111.2 million to purchase equipment and for continued expansion of manufacturing facilities, (ii) payment of $301.7 million for purchases of manufacturing facilities and related assets from OEMs and (iii) payment of $11.6 million for acquisitions of businesses. This was partially offset by $1.2 million realized from net minority equity investments of various technology companies.

     Net cash used in financing activities was $129.6 million and $62.5 million for the first quarter of fiscals 2003 and 2002, respectively. Cash used in financing activities during the first three months of fiscal 2003 related to repayments of debt obligations of approximately $179.3 million, offset by additional borrowings of $40.8 million and $9.0 million in proceeds from ordinary shares issued from our stock plans. Cash used in financing activities during the first three months of fiscal 2002 resulted from the payment of $112.0 million for the repurchase of the equity instrument from Motorola, $190.6 million used for the repayment of debt obligations, offset by $224.3 million of proceeds from long-term debt and bank borrowings and $15.7 million in proceeds from ordinary shares issued from our stock plans.

     Our working capital requirements and capital expenditures could continue to increase in order to support future expansions of our operations. It is possible that future acquisitions may be significant and may require the payment of cash. For example, we have entered into a number of transactions in which we acquired OEM facilities for cash in connection with establishing manufacturing relationships. We believe we will continue to enter into these transactions in the future. We expect that we will make payments of approximately $450.0 million in the quarter ending September 30, 2002 in connection with pending acquisitions of companies and facilities. Future liquidity needs will also depend on fluctuations in levels of inventory, the timing of expenditures by us on new

22

Table of Contents

equipment, the extent to which we utilize operating leases for the new facilities and equipment, levels of shipments and changes in volumes of customer orders.

     We believe that our existing cash balances, together with anticipated cash flows from operations and borrowings available under our credit facility will be sufficient to fund our operations through at least the next twelve months. Historically, we have funded our operations from the proceeds of public offerings of equity and debt securities, cash and cash equivalents generated from operations, bank debt, sales of accounts receivable and capital equipment lease financings. We anticipate that we will continue to enter into debt and equity financings, sales of accounts receivable and lease transactions to fund our acquisitions and anticipated growth. The sale of equity or convertible debt securities could result in dilution to our current shareholders. Further, we may issue debt securities that have rights and privileges senior to those of holders of our ordinary shares, and the terms of this debt could impose restrictions on our operations. Such financings and other transactions may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS

     In March 2002, we replaced our existing credit facilities, with an $800.0 million revolving credit facility with a syndicate of domestic and foreign banks. The credit facility consists of two separate credit agreements, one providing for up to $400.0 million principal amount of revolving credit loans to us (“Tranche A”) and one providing for up to $400.0 million principal amount of revolving credit loans to our U.S. subsidiary, Flextronics International USA, Inc. (“Tranche B”). Both Tranche A and Tranche B are split one-third to a 364-day and two-thirds to a three-year facility. Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest, at our option, either at (i) the base rate (as defined in the credit facility); or (ii) the LIBOR rate (as defined in the credit facility) plus the applicable margin for LIBOR loans ranging between 0.875% and 2.25%, based on our credit ratings and facility usage. We are required to pay a quarterly commitment fee ranging from 0.125% to 0.50% per annum, based on our credit ratings, of the unutilized portion of the credit facility.

     The credit facility is unsecured, and contains certain restrictions on our ability to (i) incur certain debt, (ii) make certain investments and (iii) make certain acquisitions of other entities. The credit facility also requires that we maintain certain financial covenants, including, among other things, a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to EBITDA (earnings before interest expense, taxes, depreciation, and amortization), a minimum ratio of fixed charge coverage, and a minimum net worth, as defined, during the term of the credit facility. Borrowings under the credit facility are guaranteed by us and certain of our subsidiaries. As of June 30, 2002, we were in compliance with our covenants.

     As of March 31, 2002, our outstanding debt obligations included: (i) borrowings outstanding related to our senior subordinated notes, (ii) amounts drawn by subsidiaries on various lines of credit, (iii) properties financed under mortgage loans, (iv) equipment financed under capital leases and (v) other term obligations. Additionally, we have leased certain of our facilities under operating lease commitments. Future payments due under our debt and lease obligations are as follows (in thousands):

     In March 2002, we entered into a receivables securitization agreement and sold a designated pool of qualified trade receivables to a third party qualified special purpose entity, which in turn sold an undivided ownership interest to a conduit, administrated by an unaffiliated financial institution. The agreement, which expires in March 2003, is subject to annual renewal and has a current maximum limit of $250.0 million. We sold $226.5 million of our accounts receivables during the first quarter of fiscal 2003 and received net cash proceeds of $131.3 million during the same period. We have a recourse obligation that is limited to our investment and 5% of the total sold receivables or $85.4 million and $10.3 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2002. The accounts receivable balances that were sold were removed from the consolidated balance sheet and the proceeds received from the sale are reflected as cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

     In fiscal 2002, we entered into operating leases with respect to properties located in Mexico and Texas. During fiscal 2002, we completed construction on the property in Mexico and began construction on the property in Texas. The amount outstanding on the Mexico and Texas properties as of June 30, 2002, was $22.9 million and $46.7 million, respectively. Upon the expiration of these leases in 2006 and 2008, respectively, we may renew the leases for an additional five years subject to certain approvals and conditions, or arrange a sale of the buildings to a third party. We also have the right to purchase the buildings at fair market value at the end of the

23

Table of Contents

lease terms, or to terminate the leases at any time by paying the outstanding termination value. We have provided a residual value guarantee, which means that if the building is sold to a third party, we are responsible for making up any shortfall between the actual sales price and the amount funded under the leases. We believe that the fair market value at June 30, 2002 exceeds the value of the residual guarantee.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

     We have loaned approximately $12.5 million to various of our executive officers. Each loan is evidenced by a promissory note in favor of Flextronics and is generally secured by a deed of trust on property of the officer. Certain notes are non-interest bearing and others have interest rates ranging from 2.48% to 7.25%. The remaining outstanding balance of the loans, including accrued interest, as of June 30, 2002, was approximately $12.8 million. Additionally, in connection with an investment partnership, one of our subsidiaries has made loans with various of our executive officers. Each loan is evidenced by a full-recourse promissory note in favor of the subsidiary. Interest rates on the notes range from 5.05% to 6.40%. The remaining balance of the loans, including accrued interest, as of June 30, 2002 was approximately $4.6 million. We will not make any further loans to our executive officers.

EFFECT OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Asset Retirement Obligations

     In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” to be effective for all fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002, with early adoption permitted. SFAS No. 143 establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of an asset retirement obligation and its associated asset retirement cost. It also provides accounting guidance for legal obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets. We will adopt SFAS No. 143 in fiscal 2004. We do not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 143 will have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Long-Lived Asset Impairment

     In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” SFAS No. 144 supercedes SFAS No. 121 and requires that one accounting model be used for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, whether previously held and used or newly acquired and by broadening the presentation of discontinued operations to include more disposal transactions. We adopted SFAS No. 144 in the first quarter of fiscal 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Exit or Disposal Activities