Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

P L X    T E C H N O L O G Y,    I N C.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

870 Maude Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94085
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (408) 774-9060

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X]      No [   ]

As of July 31, 2002, there were 23,454,213 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding.

This Report on Form 10-Q includes 24 pages with the Index to Exhibits located on page 23.

Table of Contents

PLX TECHNOLOGY, INC.
INDEX TO
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2002

2

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM I. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PLX TECHNOLOGY, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

PLX TECHNOLOGY, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

PLX TECHNOLOGY, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

PLX TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of PLX Technology, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary (collectively, “PLX” or the “Company”) as of June 30, 2002 and for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) that management considers necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, operating results and cash flows for the interim periods presented. Operating results and cash flows for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire year.

This financial data should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences may be material to the financial statements.

Comprehensive Loss

The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income”. The Company’s comprehensive net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and June 30, 2001 was as follows:

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141, “Business Combinations,” and SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” SFAS No. 141 requires all business combinations to be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and is effective for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001. SFAS No. 142 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The Company has adopted SFAS No. 142 as of January 1, 2002. Under the new rules, goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are no longer amortized, but are subject to impairment tests on at least an annual basis in accordance with SFAS No. 142. In addition,

6

Table of Contents

within six months of adopting the accounting standard, a transitional impairment test must be completed, and any impairments identified must be treated as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. During the quarter ended June 30, 2002, the Company completed its transitional impairment test and found no impairment. Other intangibles will continue to be amortized over their useful lives. The Company recharacterized acquired workforce, which is no longer defined as an acquired intangible asset under SFAS 141, as goodwill as of January 1, 2002.

The impact of SFAS No. 142 is summarized below:

In October 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, “Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of,” and addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment and disposal of long-lived assets. The Company adopted SFAS No. 144 as of January 1, 2002. Adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Reclassifications

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation format with no impact on net income. All financial information has been restated to conform to this presentation.

2. Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market (net realizable value). Inventories were as follows:

7

Table of Contents

3. Net Loss Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share:

As the Company incurred a loss for the three month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, the effect of dilutive securities, totaling 3.5 million and 3.4 million equivalent shares, respectively, have been excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share, as their impact would be anti-dilutive. For the six month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, the effect of dilutive securities, totaling 3.5 million and 3.4 million equivalent shares, respectively, have been excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share, as their impact would be anti-dilutive.

4. Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information

The Company has one operating segment, the sale of semiconductor devices. The President has been identified as the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) because he has final authority over resource allocation decisions and performance assessment. The CODM does not receive discrete financial information about individual components of the Company’s business.

Revenues by geographic region based on customer location were as follows:

For the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, two distributors accounted for 23% and 33% of net revenues, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, two distributors accounted for 25% and 35% of net revenues, respectively. No other individual distributor represented greater than 10% of net revenues.

8

Table of Contents

5. Other Intangible Assets

Information regarding the Company’s other intangible assets subject to amortization is as follows:

Patents:

Estimated amortization expenses for the fiscal years ending December 31 are as follows:

The carrying amount of indefinite lived intangibles (Tradename) as of June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 was approximately $215,000.

6. Stock Repurchase

In January 2001, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a stock repurchase program whereby up to 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock may be purchased in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. As of June 30, 2002, 10,000 shares had been repurchased at a cost of approximately $83,000.

7. Income Taxes

Income tax benefit for the three months ended June 30, 2002 was $118,000 on a pretax loss of $1,278,000, compared to income tax benefit of $1,734,000 on a pretax loss of $5,115,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2001. Income tax provision for the six months ended June 30, 2002 was $11,000 on a pretax loss of $1,420,000, compared to an income tax benefit of $1,804,000 on a pretax loss of $6,652,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The 2002 income tax expense differs from the expected benefit derived by applying the applicable U.S. federal statutory rate to the loss from operations primarily due to non-deductible acquisition-related items. The 2001 income tax benefit differs from the expected benefit derived by applying the applicable U.S. federal statutory rate to the loss from operations primarily due to non-deductible acquisition-related items partially offset by the benefit of tax exempt interest and research and development tax credits.

8. Subsequent Event

Under our stock repurchase program approved by our Board of Directors in January 2001, we have repurchased approximately 282,000 shares of our common stock at a cost of approximately $674,000 since June 30, 2002.

9

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, including statements regarding our expectations, hopes, intentions, beliefs or strategies regarding the future. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the length of our sales cycle, under the sub-heading “Overview” and our anticipated expense levels for amortization of goodwill and purchased intangible assets and deferred compensation, as well as the sufficiency of our existing resources and cash generated from operations to meet our capital requirements under the sub-heading “Results of Operations.” Actual results could differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements for the reasons detailed below under the sub-heading “Factors That May Affect Future Operating Results” and in other sections of this Report on Form 10-Q. All forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q are based on information available to us on the date of this Report on Form 10-Q, and we assume no obligation to update the forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements. See “Factors That May Affect Future Operating Results” below, as well as such other risks and uncertainties as are detailed in our Securities and Exchange Commission reports and filings for a discussion of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001.

OVERVIEW

PLX was founded in 1986, and since 1994 we have focused on development of I/O interface semiconductors and related software and development tools that are used in systems incorporating the PCI standard. In 1994 and 1995, a significant portion of our revenues was from the sale of semiconductor devices that perform similar functions as our current products, except these devices were based on a variety of industry standards. Our revenues since 1996 have been derived predominantly from the sale of semiconductor devices based on the PCI standard to a large number of customers in a variety of applications including networking and telecommunications, enterprise storage, imaging, industrial and other embedded applications as well as in related adapter cards. We generate a small portion of our revenues from sales of our software and development tools.

We utilize a “fabless” semiconductor business model whereby we purchase packaged and tested semiconductor devices from independent manufacturing foundries. This approach allows us to focus on defining, developing, and marketing our products and eliminates the need for us to invest large amounts of capital in manufacturing facilities and work-in-process inventory.

In May 2002, we entered into an agreement with Advanced Micro Devices related to HyperTransport and PCI-X technologies pursuant to which we will market semiconductor devices that are based on these standards.

We rely on a combination of direct sales personnel and distributors and manufacturers’ representatives throughout the world to sell a significant portion of our products. We pay manufacturers’ representatives a commission on sales while we sell products to distributors at a discount from the selling price. We generally recognize revenue at the time of title passage. Recognition of sales to distributors, including international distributors, is deferred until the product is resold by the distributors to end users. See “Certain Factors That May Affect Future Operating Results — A Large Portion of Our Revenues Is Derived From Sales to Third-Party Distributors Who May Terminate Their Relationships with Us at Any Time.”

Our gross margins have fluctuated in the past and are expected to fluctuate in the future due to changes in product mix, the position of our products in their respective life cycles, and specific product manufacturing costs.

10

Table of Contents

The time period between initial customer evaluation and design completion can range from six to twelve months or more. Furthermore, there is typically an additional six to twelve month or greater period after design completion before a customer commences volume production of equipment incorporating our products. Due to these lengthy sales cycles, we may experience significant fluctuations in new orders from month to month. In addition, we typically make inventory purchases prior to receiving customer orders. Consequently, if anticipated sales and shipments in any quarter do not occur when expected, expenses and inventory levels could be disproportionately high, and our results for that quarter and potentially for future quarters would be materially and adversely affected.

Our long-term success will depend on our ability to introduce new products. While new products typically generate little or no revenues during the first twelve months following their introduction, our revenues in subsequent periods depend upon these new products. Due to the lengthy sales cycle and additional time for customers to commence volume production, significant revenues from our new products typically occur only twelve to twenty-four months after product introduction. As a result, revenues from newly introduced products have, in the past, produced a small percentage of our total revenues in the year the product was introduced. See “Certain Factors That May Affect Future Operating Results — Our Lengthy Sales Cycle Can Result in Uncertainty and Delays with Regard to Our Expected Revenues.”

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table summarizes historical results of operations as a percentage of net revenues for the periods shown.

Net Revenues

Net revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2002 were $7.8 million, a decrease of 17.6% from $9.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, net revenues were $17.9 million, a decrease of 18.2% from $21.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The decrease was primarily due to lower unit shipments resulting from the current economic slowdown in the technology sector. For the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, two distributors accounted for 23% and 33% of net revenues, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, two distributors accounted for 25% and 35% of net revenues, respectively. No other individual distributor represented greater than 10% of net revenues.

Gross Margin

Gross margin represents net revenues less the cost of revenues. Cost of revenues includes the cost of purchasing packaged semiconductor devices from our independent foundries and our operating costs associated with the procurement, storage, and shipment of products. Gross margin for the three months ended June 30, 2002 was $5.4

11

Table of Contents

million, an increase of 6.8% from $5.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, gross margin was $12.2 million, a decrease of 9.4% from $13.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. Gross margin as a percentage of net revenues was 69.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2002, as compared to 53.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2001. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, gross margin as a percentage of net revenues was 68.0%, as compared to 61.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The increase in gross margin as a percentage of revenues was primarily due to shifts in our product mix as well as a $1.3 million charge taken in the second quarter of 2001 related to excess inventory.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and related costs of employees engaged in research, design, and development activities. In addition, expenses for outside engineering consultants and non-recurring engineering at our independent foundries are included in research and development expenses. Research and development expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2002 were $3.5 million, a decrease of 32.8% from $5.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, research and development expenses were $7.2 million, a decrease of 31.7% from $10.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2001. Research and development expenses as a percentage of net revenues were 45.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2002, as compared to 55.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2001. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, research and development expenses were 40.1% as a percentage of net revenues compared to 48.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The percentage decrease as well as the decrease in absolute dollars was primarily due to lower non-recurring engineering costs and lower headcount.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of employee related expenses, professional fees, trade show and other promotional expenses, and sales commissions to manufacturers’ representatives. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2002 were $3.3 million, a decrease of 17.0% from $4.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, selling, general and administrative expenses were $6.6 million, a decrease of 14.9% from $7.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The decrease in absolute dollars was primarily due to a decrease in sales commissions to manufacturers’ representatives as a result of lower revenues, lower headcount and a decrease in discretionary spending. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues were 42.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2002, as compared to 42.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2001. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues increased to 37.0% compared to 35.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The percentage increases for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 were primarily due to a decline in revenues.

Amortization of Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets

Amortization of goodwill and purchased intangible assets was $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002, a decrease of 87.3% from $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001. Amortization of goodwill and purchased intangible assets was $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, a decrease of 87.3% from $2.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The decrease was due to the impact of SFAS No. 142, whereby we discontinued the amortization of goodwill and indefinite lived intangibles beginning January 1, 2002. Amortization of goodwill and purchased intangible assets includes the amortization of goodwill and other purchased intangible assets relating to the May 2000 acquisition of Sebring Systems. Effective January 1, 2002, in accordance with SFAS No. 142, we ceased amortization of goodwill and indefinite lived intangibles. We will continue to amortize patents through May 2004. For a more detailed description of SFAS No. 142 and its effect on us, see Note 1 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Deferred Compensation

In connection with the grant of restricted stock and stock options to our employees during 1997 and 1998, we recorded aggregate deferred compensation of $361,000, representing the difference between the deemed value of our common stock for accounting purposes and the restricted stock purchase price or stock option exercise price at the date of grant. The amount of deferred compensation is presented as a reduction of stockholders’ equity and amortized ratably over the vesting period of the applicable stock grants. We also recorded deferred compensation of $12.3 million related to stock options granted below fair market value to employees in connection with the acquisition of Sebring Systems in May 2000. Additionally, we recorded deferred compensation of $3.5 million in

12

Table of Contents

connection with the grant of stock options below fair market value to our employees in September 2000. Amortization of deferred compensation was approximately $549,000 and $762,000 for each of the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and has substantially all been included in research and development expenses in our results of operations. For each of the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, amortization of deferred compensation was approximately $1,201,000 and $1,580,000, respectively. The amount of deferred compensation is amortized ratably over the vesting period of the applicable stock grants. We expect to record compensation expense related to deferred compensation of approximately $500,000 per quarter through September 30, 2003.

Interest Income and Other, Net

Interest income and other, net consists of interest earned on average cash, cash equivalents, short-term and long-term investment balances as well as rental income from a tenant in our facility. Interest income and other, net increased to $255,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 from $67,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2001. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, interest income and other, net increased to $486,000 from $298,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2001. The increase was primarily due to interest earned on higher cash and investment balances and rental income.

Provision for Income Taxes

The income tax benefit for the three months ended June 30, 2002 was $118,000 on a pretax loss of $1,278,000, compared to an income tax benefit of $1,734,000 on a pretax loss of $5,115,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2001. The income tax provision for the six months ended June 30, 2002 was $11,000 on a pretax loss of $1,420,000, compared to an income tax benefit of $1,804,000 on a pretax loss of $6,652,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The 2002 income tax expense differs from the expected benefit derived by applying the applicable U.S. federal statutory rate to the loss from operations primarily due to non-deductible acquisition-related items. The 2001 income tax benefit differs from the expected benefit derived by applying the applicable U.S. federal statutory rate to the loss from operations primarily due to non-deductible acquisition-related items partially offset by the benefit of tax exempt interest and research and development tax credits.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2002, we had $21.0 million in working capital and $8.8 million in cash and cash equivalents. Our operating activities generated cash of $3.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, and used cash of $6.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The $3.6 million of cash generated by operations was primarily attributable to a net loss of $1.4 million adjusted for non-cash expenses of $2.8 million as well as a decrease in inventories of $1.7 million, and an increase in deferred revenues of $0.6 million. These increases to cash were partially offset by an increase in other current assets of $0.9 million.

Our investing activities used cash of $5.7 million and $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and the six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively. Cash used by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2002 was primarily attributable to the purchases of long-term investments of $7.2 million and purchases of equipment of $497,000, partially offset by sales and maturities of investments of $2.0 million. Financing activities provided cash of $1.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2002 and used cash of $544,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2001. Cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2002 is primarily related to exercises of employee stock options.

In January 2002, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program whereby up to 2,000,000 shares of our common stock may be purchased in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. As of June 30, 2002, 10,000 shares had been repurchased.

As of June 30, 2002, we had no material commitments related to the purchase of capital expenditures or the leasing of facilities.

We believe that our existing resources, together with cash generated from our operations will be sufficient to meet our capital requirements for at least the next twelve months.

13

Table of Contents

FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements which involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated by such forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth below.

Our Operating Results May Fluctuate Significantly Due To Factors Which Are Not Within Our Control

Our quarterly operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past and are expected to fluctuate significantly in the future based on a number of factors, many of which are not under our control. Our operating expenses, which include product development costs and selling, general and administrative expenses, are relatively fixed in the short-term. If our revenues are lower than we expect because we sell fewer semiconductor devices or delay the release of new products or the announcement of new features, or for other reasons, we may not be able to quickly reduce our spending in response.

Other circumstances that can affect our operating results include:

	•		the timing of significant orders, order cancellations and reschedulings,
	•		general economic conditions,
	•		our ability to develop, introduce, and market new products and technologies on a timely basis,
	•		changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors or suppliers, including decreases in unit average selling prices of our products,
	•		introduction of products and technologies by our competitors,
	•		shifts in our product mix toward lower margin products,
	•		the availability of production capacity at the fabrication facilities that manufacture our products,
	•		the availability and cost of materials to our suppliers, and
	•		the political climate.

These factors are difficult to forecast, and these or other factors could adversely affect our business. Any shortfall in our revenues would have a direct impact on our business. In addition, fluctuations in our quarterly results could adversely affect the market price of our common stock in a manner unrelated to our long-term operating performance.

We Are Exposed To General Economic And Market Conditions

Our business is subject to the effects of general economic conditions in the United States and globally, and, in particular, market conditions in the communications and networking industries. In recent quarters, our operating results have been adversely affected due to unfavorable economic conditions and reduced capital spending in the United States, Europe, and Asia. If the economic conditions in the United States and globally do not improve, or if we experience a worsening in the global economic slowdown, we may continue to experience material adverse impacts on our business, operating results, and financial condition, including reduced revenue.

14

Table of Contents

Our Lengthy Sales Cycle Can Result In Uncertainty And Delays With Regard To Our Expected Revenues

Our customers typically perform numerous tests and extensively evaluate our products before incorporating them into their systems. The time required for test, evaluation and design of our products into a customer’s equipment can range from six to twelve months or more. It can take an additional six to twelve months or more before a customer commences volume shipments of equipment that incorporates our products. Because of this lengthy sales cycle, we may experience a delay between the time when we increase expenses for research and development and sales and marketing efforts and the time when we generate higher revenues, if any, from these expenditures.

In addition, the delays inherent in our lengthy sales cycle raise additional risks of customer decisions to cancel or change product plans. When we achieve a design win, there can be no assurance that the customer will ultimately ship products incorporating our products. Our business could be materially adversely affected if a significant customer curtails, reduces or delays orders during our sales cycle or chooses not to release products incorporating our products.

Rapid Technological Change Could Make Our Products Obsolete

We operate in an industry that is subject to evolving industry standards, rapid technological changes, rapid changes in customer demands and the rapid introduction of new, higher performance products with shorter product life cycles. As a result, we expect to continue to make significant investments in research and development. However, we may not have adequate funds from operations or otherwise to devote to research and development, forcing us to reduce our research and development efforts. Also, we must manage product transitions successfully, since announcements or introductions of new products by us or our competitors could adversely affect sales of our existing products because these existing products can become obsolete or unmarketable for specific purposes. There can be no assurance that we will be able to develop and introduce new products or enhancements to our existing products on a timely basis or in a manner which satisfies customer needs or achieves widespread market acceptance. Any significant delay in releasing new products could adversely affect our reputation, give a competitor a first-to-market advantage or allow a competitor to achieve greater market share. Failure to adjust to rapid technological change could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Failure Of Our Products To Gain Market Acceptance Would Adversely Affect Our Financial Condition

We believe that our growth prospects depend upon our ability to gain customer acceptance of our products and technology. Market acceptance of products depends upon numerous factors, including compatibility with existing manufacturing processes and products, perceived advantages over competing products and the level of customer service available to support such products. Moreover, manufacturers often rely on a limited number of equipment vendors to meet their manufacturing equipment needs. As a result, market acceptance of our products may be adversely affected to the extent potential customers utilize a competitor’s manufacturing equipment. There can be no assurance that growth in sales of new products will continue or that we will be successful in obtaining broad market acceptance of our products and technology.

We expect to spend a significant amount of time and resources to develop new products and refine existing products. In light of the long product development cycles inherent in our industry, these expenditures will be made well in advance of the prospect of deriving revenues from the sale of any new products. Our ability to commercially introduce and successfully market any new products is subject to a wide variety of challenges during this development cycle, including start-up bugs, design defects and other matters that could delay introduction of these products to the marketplace. In addition, since our customers are not obligated by long-term contracts to purchase our products, our anticipated product orders may not materialize, or orders that do materialize may be cancelled. As a result, if we do not achieve market acceptance of new products, we may not be able to realize sufficient sales of our products in order to recoup research and development expenditures. The failure of any of our new products to achieve market acceptance would harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

15

Table of Contents

We Must Make Significant Research And Development Expenditures Prior To Generating Revenues From Products

To establish market acceptance of a new semiconductor device, we must dedicate significant resources to research and development, production and sales and marketing. We incur substantial costs in developing, manufacturing and selling a new product, which often significantly precede meaningful revenues from the sale of this product. Consequently, new products can require significant time and investment to achieve profitability. Investors should note that our efforts to introduce new semiconductor devices or other products or services may not be successful or profitable. In addition, products or technologies developed by others may render our products or technologies obsolete or noncompetitive.

We record as expenses the costs related to the development of new semiconductor devices and other products as these expenses are incurred. As a result, our profitability from quarter to quarter and from year to year may be adversely affected by the number and timing of our new product launches in any period and the level of acceptance gained by these products.

Our Independent Manufacturers May Not Be Able To Meet Our Manufacturing Requirements

We do not manufacture any of our semiconductor devices. Therefore, we are referred to in the semiconductor industry as a “fabless” producer of semiconductors. Consequently, we depend upon third party manufacturers to produce semiconductors that meet our specifications. We currently have third party manufacturers that can produce semiconductors which meet our needs. However, as the semiconductor industry continues to progress to smaller manufacturing and design geometries, the complexities of producing semiconductors will increase. Decreasing geometries may introduce new problems and delays that may affect product development and deliveries. Due to the nature of the semiconductor industry and our status as a “fabless” semiconductor company, we could encounter fabrication related problems that may affect the availability of our semiconductor devices, may delay our shipments or may increase our costs.

Our Reliance On Single Source Manufacturers Of Our Semiconductor Devices Could Delay Shipments And Increase Our Costs

None of our semiconductor devices is currently manufactured by more than one supplier. We place our orders on a purchase order basis and do not have a long term purchase agreement with any of our existing suppliers. In the event that the supplier of a semiconductor device is unable or unwilling to continue to manufacture a product in the required volume, we would have to identify and qualify a substitute supplier or discontinue the product. For example, we plan to discontinue production of our I/O Processors in late 2002 partly because our supplier for this product is discontinuing the process on which the I/O Processors are built. We expect that this discontinuation will have no material impact on our revenues.

Introducing new products or transferring existing products to a new third party manufacturer or process may result in unforeseen device specification and operating problems. These problems may affect product shipments and may be costly to correct. Silicon fabrication capacity may also change, or the costs per silicon wafer may increase. Manufacturing-related problems may have a material adverse effect on our business.

Intense Competition In The Markets In Which We Operate May Reduce The Demand For Or Prices Of Our Products

Competition in the semiconductor industry is intense. If our main target market, the embedded systems market, continues to grow, the number of competitors may increase significantly. In addition, new semiconductor technology may lead to new products that can perform similar functions as our products. Some of our competitors and other semiconductor companies may develop and introduce products that integrate into a single semiconductor device the functions performed by our semiconductor devices. This would eliminate the need for our products in some applications.

16

Table of Contents

In addition, competition in our markets comes from companies of various sizes, many of which are significantly larger and have greater financial and other resources than we do and thus can better withstand adverse economic or market conditions. Also, as we start to sell our processor products, we will compete with established embedded microprocessor companies and others. Many of these indirect competitors and microprocessor companies have significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than PLX. Therefore, we cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully in the future against existing or new competitors, and increased competition may adversely affect our business.

Failure To Have Our Products Designed Into The Products Of Electronic Equipment Manufacturers Will Result In Reduced Sales

Our future success depends on electronic equipment manufacturers that design our semiconductor devices into their systems. We must anticipate market trends and the price, performance and functionality requirements of current and potential future electronic equipment manufacturers and must successfully develop and manufacture products that meet these requirements. In addition, we must meet the timing requirements of these electronic equipment manufacturers and must make products available to them in sufficient quantities. These electronic equipment manufacturers could develop products that provide the same or similar functionality as one or more of our products and render these products obsolete in their applications.

We do not have purchase agreements with our customers that contain minimum purchase requirements. Instead, electronic equipment manufacturers purchase our products pursuant to short-term purchase orders that may be canceled without charge. We believe that in order to obtain broad penetration in the markets for our products, we must maintain and cultivate relationships, directly or through our distributors, with electronic equipment manufacturers that are leaders in the embedded systems markets. Accordingly, we will often incur significant expenditures in order to build relationships with electronic equipment manufacturers prior to volume sales of new products. If we fail to develop relationships with additional electronic equipment manufacturers, to have our products designed into new embedded systems or to develop sufficient new products to replace products that have become obsolete, our business would be materially adversely affected.

Lower Demand For Our Customers’ Products Will Result In Lower Demand For Our Products

Demand for our products depends in large part on the development and expansion of the high-performance embedded systems markets including networking and telecommunications, enterprise storage, imaging and industrial applications. The size and rate of growth of these embedded systems markets may in the future fluctuate significantly based on numerous factors. These factors include the adoption of alternative technologies, capital spending levels and general economic conditions. Demand for products that incorporate high-performance embedded systems may not grow.

Because A Substantial Portion Of Our Net Sales Is Generated By A Small Number Of Large Customers, If Any Of These Customers Delays Or Reduces Its Orders, Our Net Sales And Earnings Will Be Harmed

Historically, a relatively small number of customers have accounted for a significant portion of our net sales in any particular period. We have no long-term volume purchase commitments from any of our significant customers. We cannot be certain that our current customers will continue to place orders with us, that orders by existing customers will continue at the levels of previous periods or that we will be able to obtain orders from new customers. In addition, some of our customers supply products to end-market purchasers and any of these end-market purchasers could choose to reduce or eliminate orders for our customers’ products. This would in turn lower our customers’ orders for our products.

We anticipate that sales of our products to a relatively small number of customers will continue to account for a significant portion of our net sales. Due to these factors, the following have in the past and may in the future reduce our net sales or earnings:

•

the reduction, delay, or cancellation of orders from one or more of our significant customers,

17

Table of Contents

	•		the selection of competing products or in-house design by one or more of our current customers,
	•		the loss of one or more of our current customers, or
	•		a failure of one or more of our current customers to pay our invoices.

Defects In Our Products Could Increase Our Costs And Delay Our Product Shipments

Our products are complex. While we test our products, these products may still have errors, defects or bugs that we find only after commercial production has begun. We have experienced errors, defects and bugs in the past in connection with new products.

Our customers may not purchase our products if the products have reliability, quality or compatibility problems. This delay in acceptance could make it more difficult to retain our existing customers and to attract new customers. Moreover, product errors, defects or bugs could result in additional development costs, diversion of technical and other resources from our other development efforts, claims by our customers or others against us, or loss of credibility with our current and prospective customers. In the past, the additional time required to correct defects has caused delays in product shipments and resulted in lower revenues. We may have to spend significant amounts of capital and resources to address and fix problems in new products.

We must continuously develop our products using new process technology with smaller geometries to remain competitive on a cost and performance basis. Migrating to new technologies is a challenging task requiring new design skills, methods and tools and is difficult to achieve.

We Could Lose Key Personnel Due To Competitive Market Conditions And Attrition

Our success depends to a significant extent upon our senior management and key technical and sales personnel. The loss of one or more of these employees could have a material adverse effect on our business. We do not have employment contracts with any of our executive officers.

Our success also depends on our ability to attract and retain qualified technical, sales and marketing, customer support, financial and accounting, and managerial personnel. Competition for such personnel in the semiconductor industry is intense, and we may not be able to retain our key personnel or to attract, assimilate, or retain other highly qualified personnel in the future. In addition, we may lose key personnel due to attrition for health, family and other reasons. We have experienced, and may continue to experience, difficulty in hiring and retaining candidates with appropriate qualifications. If we do not succeed in hiring and retaining candidates with appropriate qualifications, our business could be materially adversely affected.

A Large Portion Of Our Revenues Is Derived From Sales to Third-Party Distributors Who May Terminate Their Relationships With Us At Any Time

We depend on distributors to sell a significant portion of our products. In the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, net revenues through distributors accounted for approximately 53% and 62%, respectively, of our net revenues. Some of our distributors also market and sell competing products. Distributors may terminate their relationships with us at any time. Our future performance will depend in part on our ability to attract additional distributors that will be able to market and support our products effectively, especially in markets in which we have not previously distributed our products. We may lose one or more of our current distributors or may not be able to recruit additional or replacement distributors. For example, in March 2001, we decided to terminate our relationship with Unique Technologies, our U.S. distributor that accounted for 11% of our fiscal year 2001 revenues, and service all of our U.S. customers directly or through manufacturers’ representatives. The loss of one or more of our major distributors could have a material adverse effect on our business, as we may not be successful in servicing our customers directly or through manufacturers’ representatives.

18

Table of Contents

The Demand For Our Products Depends Upon Our Ability To Support Evolving Industry Standards

Substantially all of our revenues are derived from sales of products, which rely on the PCI standard. If the embedded systems markets move away from this standard and begin using new standards, we may not be able to successfully design and manufacture new products that use these new standards. There is also the risk that new products we develop in response to new standards may not be accepted in the market. In addition, the PCI standard is continuously evolving, and we may not be able to modify our products to address new PCI specifications. Any of these events would have a material adverse effect on our business.

The Successful Marketing And Sales Of Our Products Depend Upon Our Third Party Relationships, Most Of Which Are Not Supported By Written Agreements

When marketing and selling our semiconductor devices, we believe we enjoy a competitive advantage based on the availability of development tools offered by third parties. These development tools are used principally for the design of other parts of the embedded system but also work with our products. We will lose this advantage if these third party tool vendors cease to provide these tools for existing products or do not offer them for our future products. This event could have a material adverse effect on our business. We have no written agreements with most of these third parties, and these parties could choose to stop providing these tools at any time.

Our Limited Ability To Protect Our Intellectual Property And Proprietary Rights Could Adversely Affect Our Competitive Position

Our future success and competitive position depend upon our ability to obtain and maintain proprietary technology used in our principal products. Currently, we have limited protection of our intellectual property in the form of patents and rely instead on trade secret protection. Our existing or future patents may be invalidated, circumvented, challenged or licensed to others. The rights granted thereunder may not provide competitive advantages to us. In addition, our future patent applications may not be issued with the scope of the claims sought by us, if at all. Furthermore, others may develop technologies that are similar or superior to our technology, duplicate our technology or design around the patents owned or licensed by us. In addition, effective patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret protection may be unavailable or limited in foreign countries where we may need protection. We cannot be sure that steps taken by us to protect our technology will prevent misappropriation of the technology.

We may from time to time receive notifications of claims that we may be infringing patents or other intellectual property rights owned by third parties. While there is currently no intellectual property litigation pending against us, litigation could result in significant expense to us and adversely affect sales of the challenged product or technology. Intellectual property litigation could also divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel, whether or not the litigation is determined in our favor. In addition, we may not be able to develop or acquire non-infringing technology or procure licenses to the infringing technology under reasonable terms. This could require expenditures by us of substantial time and other resources. Any of these developments would have a material adverse effect on our business.

The Cyclical Nature Of The Semiconductor Industry May Lead To Significant Variances In The Demand For Our Products

In the last two years, the semiconductor industry has been characterized by significant downturns and wide fluctuations in supply and demand. Also, during this time, the industry has experienced significant fluctuations in anticipation of changes in general economic conditions, including economic conditions in Asia. This cyclicality has led to significant variances in product demand and production capacity. It has also accelerated erosion of average selling prices per unit. We may experience periodic fluctuations in our future financial results because of industry-wide conditions.

19

Table of Contents

Because We Sell Our Products To Customers Outside Of North America And Because Our Products Are Incorporated With Products Of Others That Are Sold Outside Of North America We Face Foreign Business, Political And Economic Risks

Sales outside of North America accounted for 58% of our revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2002. In 2001, 2000 and 1999, sales outside of North America accounted for 44%, 39% and 35% of our revenues, respectively. Sales outside of North America may fluctuate in future periods and may continue to account for a large portion of our revenues. In addition, equipment manufacturers who incorporate our products into their products sell their products outside of North America, thereby exposing us indirectly to foreign risks. Further, most of our semiconductor products are manufactured outside of North America. Accordingly, we are subject to international risks, including:

	•		difficulties in managing distributors,
	•		difficulties in staffing and managing foreign subsidiary and branch operations,
	•		political and economic instability,
	•		foreign currency exchange fluctuations,
	•		difficulties in accounts receivable collections,
	•		potentially adverse tax consequences,
	•		timing and availability of export licenses,
	•		changes in regulatory requirements, tariffs and other barriers,
	•		difficulties in obtaining governmental approvals for telecommunications and other products, and
	•		the burden of complying with complex foreign laws and treaties.

Because sales of our products have been denominated to date exclusively in United States dollars, increases in the value of the United States dollar will increase the price of our products so that they become relatively more expensive to customers in the local currency of a particular country, which could lead to a reduction in sales and profitability in that country.

Our Potential Future Acquisitions May Not Be Successful Because Of Our Limited Experience With Acquisitions In The Past

There have been a significant number of mergers and acquisitions in the semiconductor industry in the past. As part of our business strategy, we expect to review acquisition prospects that would complement our existing product offerings, improve market coverage, or enhance our technological capabilities. In May 2000, we acquired Sebring Systems. We have no current agreements or negotiations underway with respect to any acquisitions, and we may not be able to locate suitable acquisition opportunities. Future acquisitions could result in any or all of the following:

	•		potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities,
	•		large one-time write-offs,
	•		the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities or amortization expenses related to goodwill and other intangible assets,

20

Table of Contents

	•		difficulties in the assimilation of operations, personnel, technologies, products, and information systems of the acquired companies,
	•		diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns,
	•		risks of entering geographic and business markets in which we have no or limited prior experience, and
	•		potential loss of key employees of acquired organizations.

We have had limited experience with acquisitions in the past and may not be able to successfully integrate any businesses, products, technologies, or personnel that may be acquired in the future. Our failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our Principal Stockholders Have Significant Voting Power And May Take Actions That May Not Be In The Best Interests Of Our Other Stockholders

Our executive officers, directors, and other principal stockholders, in the aggregate, beneficially own a substantial amount of our outstanding common stock. Although these stockholders do not have majority control, they currently have, and likely will continue to have, substantial influence with respect to the election of our directors and approval or disapproval of our significant corporate actions. This influence over our affairs might be adverse to the interests of other stockholders. In addition, the voting power of these stockholders could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of PLX.

The Anti-Takeover Provisions In Our Certificate of Incorporation Could Adversely Affect The Rights Of The Holders Of Our Common Stock

Anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law and our Certificate of Incorporation may make a change in control of PLX more difficult, even if a change in control would be beneficial to the stockholders. These provisions may allow the Board of Directors to prevent changes in the management and control of PLX.

As part of our anti-takeover devices, our Board of Directors has the ability to determine the terms of preferred stock and issue preferred stock without the approval of the holders of the common stock. Our Certificate of Incorporation allows the issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. There are no shares of preferred stock outstanding. However, because the rights and preferences of any series of preferred stock may be set by the Board of Directors in its sole discretion without approval of the holders of the common stock, the rights and preferences of the preferred stock may be superior to those of the common stock. Accordingly, the rights of the holders of common stock may be adversely affected. Consistent with Delaware law, our Board of Directors may adopt additional anti-takeover measures in the future.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We have an investment portfolio of fixed income securities, including those classified as cash equivalents of approximately $16.0 million at June 30, 2002. These securities are subject to interest rate fluctuations and will decrease in market value if interest rates increase.

The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while at the same time maximizing yields without significantly increasing risk. We invest primarily in high quality, short-term and long-term debt instruments. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates would result in less than a $0.2 million decrease (less than 1%) in the fair value of our available-for-sale securities.

21

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

At the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 22, 2002, the following individuals were elected to the Board of Directors:

The following proposals were approved at the Company’s Annual Meeting:

22

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

     (a) Exhibits

     (b) Reports on Form 8-K. The Company did not file any reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ended June 30, 2002.

23

Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	PLX TECHNOLOGY, INC. (Registrant)
Date: August 6, 2002	By	/s/  Rafael Torres
		Rafael Torres Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

24

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX