Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-Q

(Mark
One)

For the quarterly period ended June 29, 2003

OR

Commission File No. 000-27221

VIXEL CORPORATION

11911 North Creek Parkway South
Bothell, Washington 98011
(425) 806-5509

(Address, including zip code, of Registrant’s principal executive offices and telephone number, including area code)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

     The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s common stock, $.0015 par value, as of August 11, 2003 was 24,292,445.

Table of Contents

VIXEL CORPORATION

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q FOR QUARTER ENDED JUNE 29, 2003

2

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

VIXEL CORPORATION
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

VIXEL CORPORATION
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

VIXEL CORPORATION
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

VIXEL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

     The accompanying condensed financial statements as of June 29, 2003 and for the three- and six-month periods ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002 are unaudited; however, in the opinion of management, the interim data includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations, financial position and cash flows for the interim periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of future financial results. You should read these interim financial statements in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2002.

     The preparation of condensed financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

     Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation. Reclassifications have not impacted our financial position, net loss or cash flows of the prior periods.

NOTE 2. NET LOSS PER SHARE

     Basic and diluted net loss per share represents the net loss applicable to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period presented. We have excluded outstanding convertible preferred stock, options to purchase common stock, stock subject to repurchase rights, and warrants to purchase common stock, as these securities are antidilutive for all periods presented.

     The following table sets forth the adjustments to net income resulting in net loss applicable to common stockholders (in thousands):

     The following table sets forth the antidiliutive securities excluded from the diluted net loss per share calculation for the three- and six-month periods ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002 (in thousands of shares):

6

Table of Contents

NOTE 3. STOCK OPTIONS

     We account for stock option grants pursuant to the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS 123). Under the provisions of SFAS 123, employee stock-based compensation expense is measured using either the intrinsic-value method as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (APB 25), or the fair value method described in SFAS 123. Companies choosing the intrinsic-value method are required to disclose the pro forma impact of the fair value method on net income. We have elected to continue accounting for our employee and director stock-based awards under the provisions of APB 25. We account for equity grants to other than employees and directors pursuant to the fair value provisions of SFAS 123.

     Had we determined compensation expense based on the fair value of the option at the grant date for all stock options issued to employees and for shares issued to employees at a discount pursuant to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, our net loss applicable to common stockholders and net loss per share would have been increased to the pro forma amounts indicated below (in thousands, except per share amounts):

     The stock based compensation pursuant to fair value accounting information presented has been determined as if we had accounted for our stock options issued to employees under the fair value method for all periods presented. The fair value of each option granted is estimated at the date of grant using the following weighted-average assumptions:

NOTE 4. INVENTORIES

     Inventories consist of the following:

NOTE 5. WARRANTY

     We offer product warranties of one to five years. Warranty coverages provide for the repair or replacement of defective products, at our option. Estimated future warranty obligations related to certain products are provided by charges to operations in the period in which the related revenue is recognized and reported on the balance sheet as a component of accrued liabilities. These estimates are based on historical warranty experience and other relevant information of which we are aware. Costs associated with warranty coverage may include replacement product, parts, labor and other costs. The following table sets forth the amount of warranty accrued, expensed and utilized or adjusted during the six-month period ended June 29, 2003.

7

Table of Contents

NOTE 6. SERIES B CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK

     During February 2003 we completed an $8.0 million private placement of 3,809,524 shares of our newly designated Series B Convertible Preferred Stock at $2.10 per share. In addition, the purchasers of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock received warrants to purchase 1,142,856 shares of common stock with a strike price of $2.63 per share and a 5 year term.

     Each share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is currently convertible into one share of common stock, subject to adjustment for certain dilutive events. Except as limited by law or the Certificate of Designation for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, the holders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to vote with holders of common stock at a rate of 0.8936 vote per share until holders’ shares are converted into shares of common stock. Shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock are convertible by the holder at any time. However, the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock automatically converts into common stock, if, at anytime after three years from the original issue date, the common stock has been traded with a volume weighted average price in excess of $7.00 per share for twenty of the previous thirty trading days with a minimum average trading volume of 200,000 shares per day. In addition, holders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive cumulative dividends at the rate of 6% per annum, payable on a quarterly basis on May 15, August 15, November 15 and February 15 of each year. Dividends on the preferred stock will be paid in shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock during the first year after closing and then, at our discretion, in either shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock or cash.

     In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, are generally entitled to receive a liquidation preference over the holders of Common Stock equal to the greater of (i) $2.10 per share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock held and any declared but unpaid dividends, and (ii) the amount that would have been paid to the holders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock had such preferred shares been converted to Common Stock immediately prior to such liquidation, dissolution or winding up.

     On or after the date occurring seven years from the original issue date, the holders of a majority of the then outstanding shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock may require us to redeem the outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock at the original issuance price of $2.10 per share plus any accrued but unpaid dividends. As a result of the holders’ right to demand redemption, the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock has been classified outside of stockholders’ equity on the balance sheet on the mezzanine between total liabilities and stockholders’ equity.

     We received approximately $7.8 million, net of issuance costs, from the sale and issuance of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase common stock. We allocated $6.7 million of the net proceeds to the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and $1.1 million to the warrants based on their relative fair values on the date of issuance pursuant to Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 14 “Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants.” The fair value used to allocate net proceeds to the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock was based upon a valuation that considered, among other things, the closing price of the common stock on the date of closing, the impact of the preferred stock on market capitalization on an as converted basis, dividend rights, liquidation preferences and redemption rights. The fair value used to allocate the net proceeds to the warrants to purchase common stock was based on a Black Scholes valuation model and the following assumptions: exercise price $2.63; no dividends; term of 5 years; risk free interest rate of 3.02%; and volatility of 107.4%.

     In accordance with the provisions of EITF 98-5 “Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios” and EITF 00-27 “Application of Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments,” we separately valued the in-the-money conversion feature embedded in the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and allocated $3.2 million of the proceeds allocated to the preferred stock to this embedded beneficial conversion. The allocation further reduced the carrying value of the Series B preferred stock and increased additional paid-in capital by a corresponding amount. The beneficial conversion feature will be amortized as a deemed dividend with a corresponding increase in the carrying value of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock over the period to stated redemption as described in EITF 00-27. In light of our retained deficit, the deemed dividend is currently recorded to additional paid in capital. The following table sets forth the calculation used in determining the amount of the beneficial conversion feature (in thousands, except per share amounts):

8

Table of Contents

     The aggregate of $1.1 million of proceeds allocated to the common stock warrants issued in conjunction with the offering, the $3.2 million value assigned to the embedded beneficial conversion and the $0.2 million of allocated transaction costs, was recorded as additional paid in capital resulting in an initial net carrying amount of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of $3.5 million. The $3.5 million carrying amount reflects a discount of $4.5 million from the $8.0 million to be paid to holders of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock upon mandatory redemption that may occur anytime after February 14, 2010. This $4.5 million discount from the $8.0 million redemption amount plus any accrued but unpaid dividends which increase the redemption amount will be accreted on an effective yield method, up to the earlier of the stated redemption date or conversion of the preferred shares into common. In the event that the preferred stock is converted into common stock prior to the stated redemption date, any unaccreted beneficial conversion amounts will be recorded immediately as a lump-sum deemed dividend and reflected in net loss applicable to common stockholders.

     During July 2003, we registered, on behalf of certain stockholders, 1,229,800 shares of common stock underlying the conversion of 946,000 of the 3,809,524 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock issued and 283,800 of the 1,142,856 shares of common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of warrants. During August 2003, the stockholders for whom the shares of common stock where registered commenced the conversion of their shares of preferred stock into shares of our common stock. As previously noted, the conversion of the preferred stock into common stock prior to the stated redemption date results in the immediate accretion of the remaining beneficial conversion amounts for the shares converted. As of August 12, 2003 certificates representing 874,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock have been surrendered for conversion into an equal number of shares of our common stock. Upon conversion, approximately $1.0 million of the remaining beneficial conversion amounts relating to those shares were recorded as a deemed dividend to additional paid in capital and will be reflected in net loss applicable to common stockholders for the three-month period ending September 28, 2003. Should the stockholders for whom the shares where registered convert the remaining 72,000 shares of preferred stock during our third fiscal quarter, we would recognize approximately $100,000 of additional unaccreted beneficial conversion as a deemed dividend during the three-month period ending September 28, 2003.

NOTE 7. NOTES RECEIVABLE FROM STOCKHOLDERS

     During January 2003, we repurchased 1,359,160 shares of common stock at $2.47 per share from two of our officers in a non-cash transaction and collected cash of approximately $236,000 from the officers in full satisfaction of the principal and unpaid interest balances of the officers’ notes totaling $3.6 million. Of the 1,359,160 shares repurchased by the company, 300,592 shares were granted to an officer within six months of the repurchase. In accordance with the provisions of EITF 00-23 “Issues Related to the Accounting for Stock Compensation under APB Opinion No. 25 and FASB Interpretation No. 44” the repurchase of the 300,592 shares resulted in a non-cash compensation charge to earnings during the first quarter of 2003 of $364,000.

     As of June 29, 2003, all notes receivable from stockholders had been settled in full.

NOTE 8. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

     During June 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 143 “Accounting for Obligations Associated with the Retirement of Long-Lived Assets” (SFAS 143). The provisions of FAS 143 apply to all entities that incur obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets. SFAS 143 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. Under SFAS 143, a liability for an asset retirement obligation (i.e. liability) is recognized at fair value during the period in which it is incurred. The offset to the liability is capitalized as a component of the carrying amount of the asset bringing rise to the future retirement obligation. We adopted SFAS 143 effective December 30, 2002, the beginning of our 2003 fiscal year. Our adoption of SFAS 143 did not impact our financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the three- or six-month periods ended June 29, 2003.

9

Table of Contents

     During December 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure” (SFAS 148). SFAS 148 amends the guidance set forth in Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS 123) and provides guidance for companies that elect to change their accounting for employee stock based compensation to the fair value method of accounting. The statement also expands and increases the frequency of the existing disclosure requirements to require more prominent and quarterly disclosure of the effects of stock based compensation pursuant to the provisions of SFAS 123. We adopted SFAS 148 effective December 30, 2002 and have included the expanded interim disclosures in the footnotes to our condensed financial statements contained herein. Our adoption of SFAS 148 did not impact our financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the three- or six-month periods ended June 29, 2003.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed financial statements in Item 1 of this Periodic Report and with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2002.

     This document contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The statements contained in this report that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential” or “continue,” the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially.

     Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date hereof to conform such statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations.

OVERVIEW

     We provide comprehensive Fibre Channel-based technologies and products for data storage solutions and storage networking applications. Our offering consists of a variety of new embedded storage switch products as well as our SAN interconnect switch and hub products that connect computers to data storage devices in a network configuration. Our new embedded storage switch products are based on a switch-on-a-chip, or SOC. This SOC can be embedded in a variety of data storage devices to enhance performance, improve availability, and increase the reliability of these devices. This new switching technology can be sold in chip, blade or box form to original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, for inclusion in their solutions.

     Our SOC incorporates our InSpeed^TM technology, which is our patents pending advanced switching architecture that results in a single chip capable of handling multiple Fibre Channel devices. The InSpeed SOC can be embedded into storage enclosure devices such as redundant array of independent disks, or RAID, enclosures, tape libraries, network attached storage environments and next generation storage systems to enhance the performance and scaling of these solutions as well as improve device reliability, availability and serviceability. We are also using the InSpeed SOC in Fibre Channel switches and blades that can be embedded by OEMs in their storage solutions. This technology can also be used to offer high performance, low cost switches for entry level SANs. Revenue from InSpeed-based products represented approximately 75% of our revenue for the first six-months of fiscal 2003 and 76% of our revenue for the three-month period ended June 29, 2003.

     We derive substantially all of our revenue from the sale of Fibre Channel products, including embedded storage switch products, and SAN switches and hubs to a limited number of OEMs. During the second fiscal quarter of 2003 HP Corporation and Fujitsu Limited represented 55.7% and 10.2% of revenue, respectively, compared with the same period of 2002 during which Avid Technology and HP represented 21.1% and 19.3% of revenue respectively. During the first six-months of 2003 HP represented 54.0% of revenue for the period compared with the same period of 2002 during which HP, Avid and Xyratex Technology Ltd., a contract manufacturer for Network Appliance, Inc., represented 20.7%, 16.0% and 14.0%, respectively. No other customers represented greater than 10% of revenue during the periods noted. While we are seeking to diversify our customer base and expand the portion of our revenue that is derived from sales through various distribution channels, we anticipate that our operating results will continue to depend on volume sales to a relatively small number of OEMs.

10

Table of Contents

     We have outsourced our switch and hub box product manufacturing, fulfillment and repair operations and most of our materials management to Suntron Corporation (“Suntron”). We purchase certain components directly from suppliers and resell them to Suntron at our cost and recognize no revenue from these transactions. We also outsource the manufacturing of our SOCs to third-party manufacturers that provide these components for inclusion in our product assemblies.

Critical Accounting Policies

General

     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses for the reporting periods presented. Management reviews the estimates and assumptions used for financial reporting each period and has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates and assumptions with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates and future changes to such estimates or assumptions used could materially and adversely affect the financial statements. Amounts in the financial statements, which are particularly susceptible to changes in estimates in the near term, include the recoverability of goodwill, the allowance for doubtful accounts, warranty reserves and inventory valuation.

Revenue Recognition

     We recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. We consider revenue realized or realizable and earned when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the product has been delivered to the customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.

     Product is delivered to a customer when shipped or the customer takes possession of the product. Our products ship freight on board — shipping point via customer provided transport carrier. Under circumstances in which we maintain product inventories at third party facilities where a customer may take delivery on a just-in-time basis, delivery occurs and legal title to the product transfers to the customer, when the customer takes physical possession of the inventory. Once a product is shipped or removed from a just-in-time inventory facility, the product may not be returned for credit or refund.

     We defer the recognition of revenue for sales subject to price protections or stock rotation rights offered to select customers until the expiration of such protections or rights. Price protections provide customers credit for recent purchases in the event of product price reductions while stock rotation rights provide for the return of a limited portion of the customer’s prior quarter purchases in exchange for credit to be applied to future purchases. We defer the portion of sales subject to price protections or stock rotation rights based on estimated utilization of such rights. Deferred revenue, to the extent not utilized, is recognized into revenue upon the expiration of the rights.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets Including Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets

     We review property and equipment and goodwill for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Our asset impairment review assesses the fair value of the assets based on the future cash flows the assets are expected to generate. An impairment loss is recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset plus net proceeds expected from disposition of the asset (if any) are less than the carrying value of the asset. This approach uses our estimates of future market growth, forecasted revenue and costs, expected periods the assets will be utilized and appropriate discount rates. Such evaluations of impairment of long-lived assets including goodwill are an integral part of, but not limited to, our strategic reviews of our business and operations performed in conjunction with restructuring actions. When impairment is identified, the carrying amount of the asset is reduced to its estimated fair value. Deterioration of our business in the future could lead to impairment adjustments. Those impairment adjustments could materially and adversely impact the results of operations for the period in which those adjustments are recorded.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

     We evaluate the collectibility of our trade receivables based on a combination of factors. We regularly analyze our significant customer accounts, and, should we become aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its obligations to us, we record a specific

11

Table of Contents

reserve for bad debt to reduce the related receivable to the amount we reasonably believe is collectible. We also record reserves for bad debt for all other customers based on a variety of factors including the length of time the receivables are past due, the financial health of the customer, macroeconomic considerations and historical experience. If circumstances related to specific customers change, our estimates of the recoverability of receivables could be further adjusted, possibly adversely and materially, and adjustments, whether favorable or unfavorable, would be recorded during the period in which the change in circumstances is identified.

Warranty Provision

     We provide for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. While we engage in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating the quality of our contract manufacturer and other suppliers, our estimated warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, product failures outside of our historical experience, and other costs incurred in correcting a product failure. We believe that our current warranty reserve is appropriate. However, projected product failure rates or costs could differ adversely and materially from our estimates, and revisions to the estimated warranty reserve would be required during the period in which changes in estimates are identified.

Inventory

     Inventory is carried at the lower of standard cost (which approximates current cost using a first in, first out cost flow assumption) or estimated net realizable value. We perform detailed assessments of our inventory each period, which includes reviewing, among other factors, demand requirements and product life cycle plans. Based on our analyses, we record adjustments to inventory for excess, or obsolescence, when appropriate, to reflect inventory at its net realizable value. Revisions to our inventory adjustments may be required if actual demand or product life cycles differ from our estimates, and could adversely and materially impact our statement of operations during the period in which such adjustment is necessary.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     The following table sets forth the percentage of total revenue represented by selected items from the unaudited Condensed Statement of Operations. This table should be read in conjunction with the unaudited Condensed Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.

RESTRUCTURING

     During April 2002, we adopted and implemented a restructuring plan to reduce our cost structure and focus on our InSpeed-based product development and sales. As a result of the plan, we recorded restructuring charges of $1.7 million, net of adjustments. The restructuring plan included, among other charges, a charge of $0.9 million for the consolidation of space within our Bothell, Washington corporate headquarters and our engineering facility in Irvine, California. This charge included the costs associated with the idle facility space at these locations for the remainder of the lease terms. At December 29, 2002 the $0.6 million of accrued restructuring liability

12

Table of Contents

remaining was related solely to excess facilities at our Bothell, Washington location through the first quarter of fiscal 2005. During the six-month period ended June 29, 2003 the restructuring liability was reduced to $0.5 million due to lease payments made on our Bothell facility.

SALE OF ASSETS

     On April 15, 2002, we closed a transaction with Fujitsu Software Technology Corporation, d/b/a Fujitsu Softek, involving the acquisition by Fujitsu Softek of our SAN management software assets, including our SAN management software, SAN InSite™, associated intellectual property and key development team resources. Upon closing of the transaction we received $2.5 million and a note for $2.5 million, which became due and was collected with accrued interest on January 15, 2003. In addition, we have the right to receive up to an additional $5.0 million from sales of Fujitsu Softek products based on SAN InSite during the four-year period after the closing. Net of associated costs and expenses, we recorded a gain on sale from this transaction of $4.4 million during the second quarter of 2002.

THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 29, 2003 COMPARED WITH THE THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2002

     Revenue. Revenue during the three-month periods ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002 was derived from our InSpeed, hub and switch products. Revenue increased 27% to $6.1 million from $4.8 million for the three-month periods ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002, respectively. This $1.3 million increase was due to a $4.1 million increase in revenue from our InSpeed family of products offset by declines in our hub and non-InSpeed switch products. InSpeed products represented 76% of revenue for the three-month period ended June 29, 2003 compared with 10% for the three-month period ended June 30, 2002. Revenue generated by our non-InSpeed products declined an aggregate of 65% to $1.5 million from $4.3 million for the three-month periods ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002, respectively.

     Cost of revenue. Cost of revenue includes the cost to acquire finished products from a third party manufacturer of our products, expenses we incur related to inventory management, product quality testing, customer order fulfillment, and provisions for warranty expenses and inventory obsolescence. Cost of revenue increased 24% to $3.1 million from $2.5 million for the three-month periods ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002, respectively. This $0.6 million increase was due primarily to the 27% increase in revenue partially offset by improved margins. Margins on sales increased to 49.1% of revenue in the current period compared with 48.0% during the same period in the prior year. The improvement in margins is due to higher-margin InSpeed products comprising a larger percentage of total revenue during the three-month periods ended June 29, 2003 compared with the three-month period ended June 30, 2002.

     Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses for personnel engaged in the design, development and sustaining engineering of our products, consulting and outside service fees, costs for prototype and test units and other expenses related to the design, development, testing and enhancement of our products. Research and development expenses increased 22% to $2.9 million from $2.4 million for the three-month periods ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002, respectively. This increase is primarily due to a $0.2 million increase in non-recurring engineering costs for new products and a $0.2 million increase in compensation related costs. The increase in compensation costs reflects increased staffing and use of temporary contract personnel.

     We believe that continued investment in research and development is an essential element of our strategic objectives to design quality products while reducing costs. We expect research and development expenses to continue to represent a significant portion of our overall operating expenses during the remainder of 2003 as a result of expenses incurred in the development of enhancements to existing products and development of future product offerings.

     Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions and related expenses for personnel engaged in marketing, sales, finance and information technology support functions, as well as professional fees, allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, and expenses related to various marketing activities. Selling, general and administrative expenses was consistent year over year at $2.8 million for the three-month periods ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002. The year over year consistency in the net expense reflects a $0.5 million increase in compensation, primarily due to the accounting treatment of officer and director stock based compensation. These increased costs were offset by a $0.2 million decrease in provision for doubtful accounts due to reduced credit exposures and collections, $0.1 million in reduced professional fees and a $0.1 million reduction in depreciation expense. As a percentage of revenue, selling, general and administrative expenses

13

Table of Contents

decreased to 45% from 58% for the three-month periods ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002, respectively, due to increased revenues for the respective periods.

     Amortization of intangible assets. No amortization of intangible assets was recorded for the three-month period ended June 29, 2003 as all intangible assets became fully amortized during previous periods. This compares to amortization of $0.1 million recorded during the three-month period ended June 30, 2002. Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to periodic impairment testing. No impairment of goodwill was noted during the periods presented.

     Amortization of stock-based compensation. No amortization of stock based compensation was recorded for the three-month period ended June 29, 2003 as all deferred stock compensation had been fully amortized during previous periods. This compares to amortization of $0.1 million recorded during the three-month period ended June 30, 2002.

SIX-MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 29, 2003 COMPARED WITH THE SIX-MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2002

     Revenue. Revenue during the six-month periods ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002 was derived from our InSpeed, hub and switch products. Revenue increased 22% to $11.6 million from $9.5 million for the six-month periods ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002, respectively. This $2.1 million increase was due to a $6.6 million increase in revenue from our InSpeed family of products offset by declines in our hub and non-InSpeed switch products. InSpeed products represented 75% of revenue for the six-month period ended June 29, 2003 compared with 22% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2002. Revenue generated by our non-InSpeed products declined an aggregate of 61% to $2.9 million from $7.4 million for the six-month periods ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002, respectively.

     Cost of revenue. Cost of revenue includes the cost to acquire finished products from a third party manufacturer of our products, expenses we incur related to inventory management, product quality testing, customer order fulfillment, and provisions for warranty expenses and inventory obsolescence. Cost of revenue increased 15% to $5.9 million from $5.1 million for the six-month periods ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002, respectively. This $0.8 million increase was due primarily to the 22% increase in revenue partially offset by improved margins. Margins on sales increased to 49.3% of revenue in the current period compared with 46.4% during the same period in the prior year. The improvement in margins is due to higher-margin InSpeed products comprising a larger percentage of total revenue during the six-month period ended June 29, 2003 compared with the six-month period ended June 30, 2002.

     Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses for personnel engaged in the design, development and sustaining engineering of our products, consulting and outside service fees, costs for prototype and test units and other expenses related to the design, development, testing and enhancement of our products. Research and development expenses decreased 8% to $5.5 million from $6.0 million for the six-month periods ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002, respectively. This $0.5 million decrease is primarily due to a $0.7 million decrease in compensation related costs due to the reduction of research and development personnel as a result of the sale of our SAN management software assets combined with implementation of our restructuring plan, both of which occurred during the second quarter of 2002. The decrease in compensation costs was partially offset by a $0.3 million increase in non-recurring engineering costs.

     Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions and related expenses for personnel engaged in marketing, sales, finance and information technology support functions, as well as professional fees, allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, and expenses related to various marketing activities. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 4% to $5.7 million from $5.4 million for the six-month periods ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002, respectively. This $0.3 million increase was primarily due to a $0.7 million increase in compensation, primarily due to the accounting treatment of officer and director stock based compensation offset by a $0.2 million decrease in professional fees, $0.1 million decrease in provision for bad debts, and a $0.1 million decrease in relocation and recruiting costs. As a percentage of revenue, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 49% from 57% for the six-month periods ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002, respectively, due to increased revenues for the respective periods.

     Amortization of intangible assets. Amortization of intangible assets recorded for the six-month period ended June 29, 2003 was negligible compared to $0.2 million recorded during the six-month period ended June 30, 2002. This decrease is due to all intangibles becoming fully amortized during 2003. Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to periodic impairment testing. No impairment of goodwill was noted during the periods presented.

14

Table of Contents

     Amortization of stock-based compensation. Amortization of stock based compensation decreased 71% to $0.1 million from $0.4 million for the six-month periods ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002, respectively. During 2003 all remaining deferred stock compensation was fully amortized.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

     Since inception, we have financed our operations primarily through the sale of common and preferred stock with aggregate proceeds of approximately $123.7 million, including $8.0 million received during February 2003 upon closing our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock financing. Additionally, we have financed our operations through capital equipment lease lines, working capital credit facilities, notes payable, $6.9 million in net cash received from the sale of our laser diode fabrication facility and gigabit Ethernet product line and $4.7 million in net cash received from the sale of our SAN management software assets. Our principal sources of liquidity at June 29, 2003 consisted of $11.9 million in cash and cash equivalents and $9.6 million in liquid investments.

     Cash utilized by operating activities was $4.8 million for the six-month period ended June 29, 2003, and was due primarily to our operating loss, net of non-cash expenses. Cash provided by investing activities was $3.8 million and resulted from maturities of short-term investments of $10.0 million, proceeds from the collection of a $2.5 million note receivable received in conjunction with the sale of our SAN management software assets, offset by $7.5 million of purchases of short-term investments and capital expenditures of $1.2 million. Cash provided by financing activities reflects the $7.8 million raised in conjunction with our sale of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock combined with $0.9 million provided by stockholder note collections, employee stock purchase plan stock sales and the exercises of employee stock options.

     As of June 29, 2003, we had an accumulated deficit of $139.2 million and have never been profitable. We plan to grow our revenue base and continue to control our expenses in order to achieve profitability. However, we cannot be certain that we will ever realize sufficient revenue to achieve profitability. Even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability.

     We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalent and short-term investment balances will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements at least through the next eighteen months. However, we may be required, or could elect, to seek additional funding prior to that time. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our future revenue, the timing and extent of spending to support product development efforts and sales, general and administrative activities, the timing of introductions of new products, and market acceptance of our products. We cannot assure you that additional equity or debt financing, if required, will be available on acceptable terms or at all.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

     During January 2003, we repurchased 1,359,160 shares of common stock at $2.47 per share from two officers in a non-cash transaction and collected cash of approximately $236,000 from the officers in full satisfaction of the principal and unpaid interest balances of the officers’ notes totaling $3.6 million. The note receivable arrangements were originally entered into during April and May of 1999 in connection with the exercise of stock options. Of the 1,359,160 shares 300,592 shares repurchased by the company were granted to an officer within six months of the repurchase. Therefore, these shares are subject to the provisions of EITF 00-23 “Issues Related to the Accounting for Stock Compensation under APB Opinion No. 25 and FASB Interpretation No. 44” and resulted in a non-cash compensation charge to earnings during the first quarter of 2003 of $364,000.

     As of June 29, 2003, all notes receivable from stockholders had been settled in full.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

     During June 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 143 “Accounting for Obligations Associated with the Retirement of Long-Lived Assets" (SFAS 143). The provisions of FAS 143 apply to all entities that incur obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets. SFAS 143 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. Under SFAS 143, a liability for an asset retirement obligation (i.e. liability) is recognized at fair value during the period in which it is incurred. The offset to the liability is capitalized as a component of the carrying amount of the asset bringing rise to the future retirement obligation. We adopted SFAS 143 effective December 30, 2002, the beginning of our 2003 fiscal year. Our adoption of SFAS 143 did not impact our financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the three- or six-month periods ending June 29, 2003.

15

Table of Contents

     During December 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure” (SFAS 148). SFAS 148 amends the guidance set forth in Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS 123 and provides guidance for companies that elect to change their accounting for employee stock based compensation to the fair value method of accounting. The statement also expands and increases the frequency of the existing disclosure requirements to require more prominent and quarterly disclosure of the effects of stock based compensation pursuant to the provisions of SFAS 123. We adopted SFAS 148 effective December 30, 2002 and have included the expanded interim disclosures in the footnotes to our condensed financial statements contained herein. Our adoption of SFAS 148 did not impact our financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the three- or six-month periods ending June 29, 2003.

FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

We have incurred significant losses since our inception, we expect future losses, and we may not become profitable.

     We have incurred significant losses since inception, most recently a net loss of $5.4 million for the six-month period ended June 29, 2003, and expect to incur losses in the future. As of June 29, 2003, we had an accumulated deficit of $139.2 million. We expect to incur significant product development, sales and marketing and administrative expenses, and we will need to generate significant revenue to achieve and maintain profitability. We cannot be certain that we ever will realize sufficient revenue to achieve profitability and even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability.

Our operating results fluctuate significantly and may vary in future periods for a number of reasons, including unfavorable economic and market conditions, which could adversely affect the trading price of our stock.

     Our revenue and results of operations have varied on a quarterly basis in the past and may vary significantly in the future due to a number of factors, many of which may cause our stock price to fluctuate. Some of the factors that could affect our operating results include:

	•		the size, terms, timing and fluctuations of customer orders, particularly orders from a limited number of OEMs;
	•		changes in general economic conditions and specific economic conditions in the computer storage and networking industries, including changes in spending levels for information technology products;
	•		the gain or loss of significant OEMs or other customers;
	•		the rate of market acceptance of our InSpeed technology;
	•		the length of time needed by customers for the evaluation and integration of our products;
	•		delays in or longer than expected design cycles for new products;
	•		our ability to attain and maintain sufficient reliability levels for our products;
	•		our ability to develop and market new products;
	•		the timing of the introduction or enhancement of products by us, our OEMs and our competitors;
	•		decreases in the prices at which we can sell our products;
	•		changes in the mix of products sold or the mix of sales channels; and
	•		the ability of our contract manufacturer to produce and distribute our products in a timely fashion.

     As a result of these and other factors, we believe that period to period comparisons of our operating results should not be relied upon as an indicator of our future performance. It is likely that in some future period our operating results will be below our guidance, your expectations or the expectations of public market analysts.

Our OEMs have unpredictable order patterns, which may cause our revenue to vary significantly from period to period.

     Our OEMs tend to order sporadically, and their purchases can vary significantly from quarter to quarter. Our OEMs generally forecast expected purchases in advance, but frequently do not order as expected and tend to place purchase orders only shortly before the scheduled delivery date. We plan our operating expenses based in part on revenue projections derived from our OEMs’ forecasts.

16

Table of Contents

Because most of our expenses are fixed in the short term or incurred in advance of anticipated revenue, we may not be able to decrease our expenses in a timely manner to offset any unexpected shortfall in revenue. These typical ordering practices cause our backlog to fluctuate significantly. Moreover, our backlog is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any succeeding period, as orders are subject to cancellation or delay by our OEMs with limited or no penalty.

Our largest customer accounted for 54% of our revenue during the first six-months of fiscal 2003. The loss of this or other of our major customers could significantly reduce our revenue and harm our operating results.

     Our success will depend on our continued ability to develop and manage relationships with significant OEMs, resellers and integrators, as well as on the sales efforts and success of these customers. Revenue from HP (including Compaq Computer Corporation) represented 54.0% of total revenue for the six-month period ended June 29, 2003. Although we are attempting to expand our base of OEMs and resellers, most of our future revenue may come from a small number of customers.

     Our agreements with our customers do not provide any assurance of future sales to those customers. For example:

	•		our OEM and reseller agreements are not exclusive and contain no renewal obligation;
	•		our OEMs and resellers can stop purchasing and marketing our products at any time; and
	•		our OEM and reseller agreements do not require minimum purchases.

     We cannot be certain that we will retain our current OEMs and resellers or that we will be able to recruit additional or replacement customers. Many of our OEMs and resellers carry or utilize competing product lines. If we were to lose one or more OEMs or resellers to a competitor, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be harmed significantly.

We are focusing the majority of our development, sales and marketing resources on the new embedded storage switch market. Our success is dependent upon the market acceptance of our embedded storage switch products and growth of the storage market.

     We are focusing the majority of our development, sales and marketing resources on the new embedded storage switch market. Our InSpeed based products incorporate a relatively new technology we developed for this market. Our success in generating revenue in this market will depend on, among other things, our ability to:

	•		demonstrate the benefits of embedded switch products to OEMs;
	•		enhance our existing embedded storage switch products and introduce new products on a timely basis to meet changes in customer preferences and evolving industry standards;
	•		develop, maintain and build relationships with leading storage OEMs; and
	•		accurately predict the direction of industry standards and base our products on those industry standards.

     If the acceptance of our InSpeed technology and InSpeed based products by large OEMs does not materialize, or the market for back-end embedded storage switches does not grow, our results of operations and financial condition could be harmed significantly.

The sales cycle for our products are long and we may incur substantial non-recoverable expenses and devote significant resources to sales that do not occur when anticipated or at all.

     OEMs and resellers typically conduct significant evaluation, testing, implementation and acceptance procedures before they will begin to market and sell new solutions that include our products. This evaluation process is lengthy and may range from six months to one year or more. This process is complex and may require significant sales, marketing and management efforts on our part. This process becomes more complex as we simultaneously qualify our products with multiple customers. As a result, we may expend significant resources to develop customer relationships before we recognize any revenue from these relationships, or we may never realize any revenue from these efforts, or recognize revenue when anticipated.

17

Table of Contents

Competing technologies to Fibre Channel may emerge and we may fail to adopt new technologies on a timely basis, which may decrease the demand for our products.

     Emerging technologies, such as Ethernet IP, SCSI (Small Computer System Interface) over IP, SATA (Serial Advanced Technology Attachment) and Infiniband are potential competing alternatives to Fibre Channel. If we are unable to identify new technologies in a timely manner and efficiently utilize such new technologies in our product development efforts, the demand for our current products may decrease significantly and rapidly, which would harm our business.

We expect that a growing percentage of our future revenue will be derived from our InSpeed technology-based products and our success will depend on widespread acceptance of these products and technologies and our ability to manage transition from older products.

     Our future revenue growth will depend on the success of our new InSpeed products and product launches by customers that incorporate our InSpeed SOCs and switches. In addition, as we introduce new or enhanced InSpeed products, we will have to manage successfully the transition from older releases in order to minimize disruption in our customers’ ordering patterns, avoid excessive levels of older product inventories and ensure that enough supplies of new products can be delivered to meet our customers’ demands. To the extent customers defer or cancel orders in expectation of new product releases, any delay in development or introduction of new products could cause our operating results to suffer.

We face intense competition in the storage industry, which may lead to reduced prices and sales of our products and increased losses.

     We target our embedded storage switches at a new and evolving segment of the storage market. As yet no other company has publicly introduced products similar to our InSpeed family of products. As this market grows we may face competition from storage networking switch providers, including Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., QLogic Corporation and PMC-Sierra, Inc., semiconductor companies, or OEMs, including our OEM customers, that may choose to develop technology or products that compete with ours.

     The markets for SAN interconnect products are highly competitive and we expect that more companies, including our customers, may enter the market for SAN interconnect products. Our current competitors include a number of domestic and international companies, many of which have longer operating histories, greater name recognition and substantially greater financial, technical, and sales and marketing resources, and may have larger distribution channels, access to more customers and a larger installed customer base than we do. As a result, these companies may be able to undertake more extensive marketing campaigns and adopt more aggressive pricing policies than we can. We may not have the financial resources, technical expertise or marketing, manufacturing, distribution, and support capabilities to compete successfully in the future. There can also be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors or that current or future competitive pressures will not materially harm our business.

     For SAN interconnect sales, we compete primarily with Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., QLogic Corporation and PMC-Sierra, Inc. Our competitors continue to introduce improved SAN products with lower prices, and we will have to do the same to remain competitive. Furthermore, our customers or larger companies in other related industries may develop or acquire technologies and apply their significant resources, including their distribution channels and brand recognition, to capture significant SAN market share.

The storage industry is subject to rapid technological change, and we must keep pace with the changes to successfully compete.

     Given the product life cycles in the markets for our products, any delay or unanticipated difficulty associated with new product introductions or product enhancements could significantly harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. We may not be able to develop, manufacture and market these new products or other product enhancements in a timely manner or in a manner that will achieve market acceptance. We also may not be able to develop the underlying core technologies necessary to create new products and enhancements, or to license these new technologies from third parties. Product development delays may result from numerous factors, including:

	•		changing OEM product specifications;
	•		difficulties in hiring and retaining necessary personnel;
	•		difficulties in reallocating engineering resources and overcoming resource limitations;
	•		difficulties with independent contractors or development partners;

18

Table of Contents

	•		changing market or competitive product requirements; and
	•		unanticipated engineering complexities.

The loss of Suntron, our outside contract manufacturer, or the failure to accurately forecast demand for our products or manage successfully our relationship with Suntron could negatively affect our business.

     We rely on Suntron, an outside contract-manufacturing firm, to manufacture, store and ship our box products. We share Suntron’s manufacturing and assembly capacity with numerous companies whose needs may conflict with ours. If Suntron is unable, unwilling, or fails to complete production runs for us in the future, or experiences any significant delays in completing production runs or shipping our products, the manufacturing, assembly and sale of our products could be temporarily suspended for an undeterminable period of time. We have in the past experienced delivery problems based on capacity constraints for production, test and material supply. If our product volume requirements increase, we may find it necessary to augment our manufacturing and assembly capacity by engaging new subcontract manufacturers. We may not be successful in finding qualified manufacturers that meet our needs. An interruption in supply of our products, or additional costs incurred to qualify and shift production to an alternative manufacturing and assembly facility, would significantly harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

     Suntron is not obligated to supply products for us, except as may be provided in a particular purchase order that Suntron has accepted. We place purchase orders with Suntron based on periodic forecasts. Most of the materials used in our products are standard products, however, some materials are proprietary and/or sole-source and require extended lead times. Our business will be adversely affected if we are unable to accurately forecast demand for our products and manufacturing capacity or if materials are not available at Suntron to meet the demand. Lead times for materials and components vary significantly and depend on the specific supplier, contract terms and demand for a component at a given time. We also may experience shortages of components from time to time, which could delay the manufacture of our products.

     We plan to regularly introduce new products and product enhancements, which will require that we coordinate our efforts with Suntron to rapidly achieve volume production. If we do not effectively manage our relationship with Suntron, or if Suntron experiences delays, disruptions, capacity constraints, or quality control problems in, or reduces or discontinues its manufacturing operations, our ability to ship products to our customers could be delayed and our competitive position and reputation could be harmed. Qualifying a new contract manufacturer and commencing volume production is expensive and time consuming. If we are required to or if we choose to change contract manufacturers, we may lose revenue and damage our customer relationships.

We may lose sales if our sole source suppliers fail to meet our needs.

     We currently purchase several key components from single sources. We depend on single sources for our SOCs, card guides, ASICs and our microprocessors. ASICs are custom designed computer chips that perform specific functions very efficiently. In addition, we license software from a third party that is incorporated into our switches and hubs. If we cannot supply our SOCs or other products due to a lack of availability of the single source components, or are unable to redesign products with other components in a timely manner, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.

If we fail to forecast accurately the demand for our products, it will negatively affect our business.

     We use rolling forecasts based on anticipated product orders to determine our component requirements. Lead times for materials and components that we order vary significantly and depend on factors such as specific supplier requirements, contract terms and current market demand for particular components. As a result, our component requirement forecasts may not be accurate. If we overestimate our component requirements, we may have excess inventory, which would increase our costs. If we underestimate our component requirements, we may have inadequate inventory, which could interrupt our manufacturing and delay delivery of our products to our customers. Either of these occurrences would negatively impact our business and operating results.

Undetected software or hardware defects in our products could increase our costs and reduce our revenue, and damage our reputation with current or prospective customers.

     Fibre Channel products, including InSpeed based products, frequently contain undetected software or hardware defects when first introduced or as new versions are released. Our products are complex and problems may be found from time to time in our existing, new or enhanced products. Our products incorporate components manufactured by third parties. We have in the past experienced difficulties with quality and reliability of components obtained from third parties, and we could experience similar

19

Table of Contents

problems in the future. In addition, our products are integrated with products from other vendors. As a result, when problems occur, it may be difficult to identify the source of the problem. These problems may cause us to incur significant warranty and repair costs, divert the attention of our engineering personnel from our product development efforts, cause significant customer relations problems, and damage our reputation.

If we fail to successfully develop and maintain the Vixel and InSpeed brands, our revenue may not grow and our stock price may decline.

     We believe that establishing and maintaining the Vixel and InSpeed brands is a critical aspect of our efforts to maintain and develop strategic OEM and reseller relationships, and that the importance of brand recognition will increase due to the growing number of vendors of Fibre Channel products. If we fail to promote our brands successfully, or if we incur excessive expenses in an attempt to promote and maintain the Vixel or InSpeed brands, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected. In addition, if our OEMs, resellers and end users of our products do not perceive our products to be of high quality, or if we introduce new products or technologies that are not accepted by the market, the value of the Vixel or Inspeed brands may decline and our business may suffer.

If we lose key senior management or are unable to hire qualified personnel, we may not be successful.

     Our success depends to a significant degree upon the continued joint contributions of our senior management, including James M. McCluney, President and Chief Executive Officer, Kurtis L. Adams, Chief Financial Officer, Stuart B. Berman, Chief Technology Officer, Thomas Hughes, Vice President, Product Development, Kelsey L. Britz, Vice President, Operations and Customer Service, and Reza Norouzian, Vice President, Worldwide Sales. We believe our future success will depend in large part upon our ability to attract and retain highly skilled managerial, technical, sales and marketing, finance and operations personnel. The loss of services of any of our key personnel could have a negative impact on our business. We also need to increase the number of technical staff members with experience in ASIC design as we further develop our product line. Competition for these highly skilled employees in our industry is intense.

     In addition, employees may leave our company and subsequently compete against us. Moreover, companies in our industry whose employees accept positions with competitors frequently claim that their competitors have engaged in unfair hiring practices. We may be subject to claims of this type in the future as we seek to hire qualified personnel and some of these claims may result in material litigation. We could incur substantial costs in defending ourselves against these claims, regardless of their merits.

As our international sales expand, our business, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected as a result of legal, business, political and economic risks specific to our international sales.

     Our revenue from sales to international locations represented 34% of our total revenue for the six-month period ended June 29, 2003. We plan to expand our international sales, especially in Japan and Asia. Our international sales growth will be limited if we are unable to establish relationships with international OEMs and distributors, establish foreign operations, effectively manage international sales channels and develop relationships with service organizations. We cannot be certain that we will be able to establish, generate and build market demand for our products internationally. Our international operations will be subject to a number of risks, including:

	•		increased complexity and costs of managing international operations;
	•		multiple protectionist, conflicting and changing governmental laws and regulations;
	•		longer sales cycles;
	•		difficulties in collecting accounts receivables;
	•		reduced or limited protections of intellectual property rights; and
	•		political and economic instability.

     These factors and others could harm future sales of our products to international customers, which would negatively impact our business and operating results. To date, none of our international revenue has been denominated in foreign currencies. As a result, an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies could make our products more expensive and thus less competitive in foreign markets. In the future, a portion of our international revenue may be denominated in foreign currencies, including the Euro, which would subject us to risks associated with foreign currency fluctuations.

20

Table of Contents

     Our products are subject to U.S. Department of Commerce export control restrictions. Neither our customers nor we may export those products without obtaining an export license. These U.S. export laws also prohibit the export of our products to a number of countries deemed by the United States to be hostile. These restrictions may make foreign competitors facing less stringent controls on their products more competitive in the global market than are our customers or we. The U.S. government may not approve any pending or future export license requests. In addition, the list of products and countries for which export approval is required, and the regulatory policies with respect thereto, could be revised. The sale of our products could be harmed by our failure or the failure of our customers to obtain the required government licenses or by the costs of compliance.

Our Fibre Channel products must comply with evolving industry standards in the storage markets and government regulations, and if we cannot develop products that are compatible with these evolving standards, our business will suffer.

     The market for Fibre Channel products is characterized by the need to support industry standards as they emerge, evolve and achieve acceptance. To remain competitive, we must continue to introduce new products and product enhancements that meet these industry standards. All components of a storage device or a SAN must utilize the same standards in order to operate together. Our products comprise only a part of a storage device or an entire SAN and we depend on the companies that provide other components, many of which are significantly larger than we are, to support industry standards as they evolve. We also depend on our competitors to support these same industry standards. The failure of these providers or our competitors to support these industry standards could negatively impact market acceptance of our products.

     In addition, in the United States, our products must comply with various regulations and standards defined by the Federal Communications Commission and Underwriters Laboratories. Internationally, products that we develop also will be required to comply with standards established by authorities in various countries. Failure to comply with existing or evolving industry standards or to obtain timely domestic or foreign regulatory approvals or certificates could materially harm our business.

We may not be able to adequately protect or enforce our intellectual property rights, which could harm our competitive position.

     We believe that our continued success depends on protecting our proprietary technology, including InSpeed. We currently rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets and contractual provisions to establish and protect our intellectual property rights. In addition, we also enter into confidentiality or license agreements with our employees, consultants and corporate partners, and control access to and distribution of our documentation and other proprietary information. Our failure to protect our intellectual property rights could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Efforts to protect our intellectual property could be time consuming and expensive and could have a material adverse effect on results of operations and financial condition.

     On March 3, 2003 we filed a patent infringement action against QLogic Corporation in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The complaint states that QLogic is infringing U.S. Patent No. 6,118,776, entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Fiber Channel Interconnection of Private Loop Devices,” through the unauthorized manufacture, use, sale and offering for sale of various storage area network switching products, including QLogic’s SANBox2 product. On May 23, 2003 we filed a patent infringement action against Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint states that Brocade is infringing U.S. Patent No. 6,185,203, entitled “Fibre Channel Switching Fabric”, U.S. Patent No. 6,118,776, entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Fiber Channel Interconnection of Private Loop Devices”, and U.S. Patent No. 6,470,007, entitled “Interconnect System for Fibre Channel Arbitrated Loop Including Private Loop Devices”, through the unauthorized manufacture, use, sale and offering for sale of various storage area network switching products, including Brocade’s Silkworm switch products, which include its “QuickLoop” and “Fabric Assist” product features. QLogic and Brocade have challenged the validity of the patents referenced, and Brocade has also challenged the enforceability of those patents. In both of these suits, we are seeking unspecified past damages, potential future royalties, or, alternatively, injunctive relief. We have entered the discovery phase in both of these actions and we remain committed to protecting our intellectual property.

     We cannot be certain that the steps we take to protect our intellectual property will adequately protect our proprietary rights, that others will not independently develop or otherwise acquire equivalent or superior technology or that we can maintain any of our technology as trade secrets. In addition, the laws of some of the countries in which our products are or may be sold may not protect our products and intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States, or at all.

Third-party claims of infringement of their intellectual property rights could affect our ability to market our products, require us to seek licenses from third parties, and adversely affect our business.

21

Table of Contents

     In recent years, there has been significant litigation in the United States involving patents and other intellectual property rights. We have in the past received communications from third parties alleging patent infringement, and there always is the chance that third parties may assert infringement claims against us. Future patent infringement disputes, with or without merit, could result in costly litigation, cause product shipment delays or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. We cannot be certain that the necessary licenses would be available or that they could be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. If we fail to obtain these royalty or licensing agreements in a timely manner and on reasonable terms, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.

Our stock price may continue to be volatile. Accordingly, you may not be able to resell your shares of common stock at or above the price you paid for them.

     The trading price of our common stock has been and is likely to continue to be volatile. The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly, particularly as a result of variations between our actual financial results and the expectations of the investment community, and as a result of announcements by our competitors and us. Furthermore, speculation about our strategic position, financial condition, results of operations, or business can cause significant changes in our stock price. In addition, the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market price of many technology companies, in particular, and that have often been unrelated to the operating performance of these companies. In addition, the stock market has recently experienced extreme volatility that often has been unrelated to the performance of particular companies. These factors, as well as general and economic conditions, may cause our stock price to fall regardless of our performance.

Our preferred stockholders have significant control over us and may approve or reject matters contrary to the common stockholders’ vote or interests.

     During February 2003, we completed a private placement of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred”) and warrants to purchase common stock. So long as 1,450,000 shares of Series B Preferred remain outstanding, the Series B Preferred holders have the right to appoint a director to our board and certain actions, such as the authorization and sale of certain senior securities, that we may wish to undertake require the consent of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series B Preferred, voting as a separate class. The interests of the holders of our Series B Preferred will not necessarily be identical to those of holders of our common stock. For instance, in the event of certain change in control transactions, the holders of the Series B Preferred are entitled to payment of a liquidation preference prior to the payment of any consideration to the holders of our common stock. This may cause the holders of the Series B Preferred to favor or oppose a merger or sale of the Company or its assets in circumstances where holders of common stock may have a contrary desire.

The sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock could cause the market price of our shares to decline.

     Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the appearance that such shares are available for sale, could adversely affect the market price for our common stock. In connection with our private placement of preferred stock during February 2003, we agreed to file registration statements with the SEC covering the resale by those investors of 3,809,524 shares of common stock underlying the conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and 1,142,856 shares of common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of the warrants issued in that private placement. Once registered for resale these shares become freely tradeable, subject only to prospectus delivery requirements and possible restrictions under Rule 144. During July 2003, we registered, on behalf of certain stockholders, 946,000 shares of common stock underlying the conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and 283,800 shares of common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of warrants. The registration of the remainder of these shares, or the sale of a substantial number of these shares, may cause our stock price to decline regardless of our performance.

We may seek to raise additional capital, but additional funds may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all, limiting our ability to develop new products or respond to competitive pressures.

     Including the proceeds from the sale of preferred stock and the collection of the note from the sale of SAN InSite during early 2003, we believe that our existing cash, cash equivalent and investment balances will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements at least through the next eighteen months. However, we may require, or could elect to pursue, additional financing to fund our operations in the future. If we need to raise additional capital, we may not be able to do so on favorable terms, or at all, especially if we experience disappointing operating results. If we cannot raise funds on acceptable terms, we may not be able to develop or enhance our products, take advantage of future opportunities or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated funding requirements.

22

Table of Contents

Our corporate offices and principal product development facility are located in regions that are subject to earthquakes and other natural disasters.

     Our corporate offices in Bothell, Washington and research facility in Irvine, California are located near major earthquake faults. We are not specifically insured for earthquakes, or other such natural disasters. Any personal injury or damage to the facilities as a result of such occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our stockholder rights plan, certificate of incorporation and Delaware law could adversely affect the performance of our stock.

     Our stockholder rights plan and provisions of our certificate of incorporation and the Delaware General Corporation Law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders. The stockholder rights plan and these provisions of our certificate of incorporation and Delaware law are intended to encourage potential acquirers to negotiate with us and allow our board of directors the opportunity to consider alternative proposals in the interest of maximizing stockholder value. However, such provisions may also discourage acquisition proposals or delay or prevent a change in control, which could harm our stock price.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

     We maintain investment portfolio holdings of various issuers, types, and maturities, the majority of which are commercial paper and government securities. These securities are generally classified as available for sale and, consequently, are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value.

     Our investment portfolio, with a fair value of $9.6 million as of June 29, 2003, is invested in commercial paper, government securities and corporate indebtedness that could experience an adverse decline in fair value should an increase in interest rates occur. In addition, future declines in interest rates could have an adverse impact on interest earnings for our investment portfolio. We do not currently hedge against this interest rate exposure.

     All of our revenue is realized in U.S. dollars and is from customers primarily headquartered in the United States. Therefore, we do not believe we currently have any significant direct foreign currency exchange risk.

ITEM 4. DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

     We conducted an evaluation of our controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, within 90 days of the filing of this report. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the date of the evaluation, our disclosure controls were effective in providing reasonable assurance that the material information required to be included in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is properly recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time specified periods pursuant to SEC rules. It should be noted that the design of any system of control is based in part upon certain assumptions, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated objectives.

     In addition, there were no significant changes in our system of internal control or in other factors that could significantly impact these controls subsequent to the date of evaluation. Furthermore, we have not identified any material deficiencies or weaknesses in our system of internal control, therefore no corrective actions were taken.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

      On November 15, 2001, a securities class action was filed in the United States District Court in the Southern District of New York against two of our officers and directors and certain underwriters who participated in our initial public offering in late 1999. The complaint alleges violations under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 and seeks unspecified damages on behalf of persons who purchased our stock during the period October 1, 1999 through December 6, 2000. Subsequent to the filing, the Court issued a summary judgment releasing our officers and directors from the action. During June 2003, we and the other issuer defendants in the action reached a tentative settlement with the plaintiffs that would, among other things, result in the dismissal with prejudice of all claims against the defendants and their officers and directors. Although we have approved this settlement proposal in principle, it remains subject to a number of procedural conditions, as well as formal approval by the Court.

23

Table of Contents

     On March 3, 2003 we filed a patent infringement action against QLogic Corporation in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The complaint states that QLogic is infringing U.S. Patent No. 6,118,776, entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Fiber Channel Interconnection of Private Loop Devices,” through the unauthorized manufacture, use, sale and offering for sale of various storage area network switching products, including QLogic’s SANBox2 product. On May 23, 2003 we filed a patent infringement action against Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint states that Brocade is infringing U.S. Patent No. 6,185,203, entitled “Fibre Channel Switching Fabric”, U.S. Patent No. 6,118,776, entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Fiber Channel Interconnection of Private Loop Devices”, and U.S. Patent No. 6,470,007, entitled “Interconnect System for Fibre Channel Arbitrated Loop Including Private Loop Devices”, through the unauthorized manufacture, use, sale and offering for sale of various storage area network switching products, including Brocade’s Silkworm switch products, which include its “QuickLoop” and “Fabric Assist” product features. QLogic and Brocade have challenged the validity of the patents referenced, and Brocade has also challenged the enforceability of those patents. In both of these suits, we are seeking unspecified past damages, potential future royalties, or, alternatively, injunctive relief. We have entered the discovery phase in both of these actions and we remain committed to protecting our intellectual property.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

     We held our Annual Stockholders Meeting on May 20, 2003 in Bothell, Washington. Of the 27,040,724 shares of Common Stock and Preferred Stock outstanding as of the record date, 24,863,192 shares were represented in person or by proxy at the meeting. The results of the voting on the maters submitted to the stockholders were as follows:

     1.     To elect two Class I directors to serve until the 2006 Annual Meeting and until their successors are elected and qualified.

     2.     To ratify the selection by the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 28, 2003.

     The directors continuing in office until the 2004 Annual Meeting are Charles A. Haggerty and Robert S. Messina. Directors continuing in office until the 2005 Annual Meeting are James M. McCluney, Peter J. Perrone and Timothy M. Spicer.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)

Exhibits:

24

Table of Contents

(b)

Reports on Form 8-K:

     We filed the following reports on Form 8-K during the second fiscal quarter of 2003 and through the filing of this Quarterly Report:

(i)		On April 22, 2003 Vixel filed a report on Form 8-K, which reported under Item 9 the press release entitled “Vixel Corporation Announces First Quarter 2003 Financial Results” relating to the financial results of the quarter ended March 30, 2003.
(ii)		On July 22, 2003 Vixel filed a report on Form 8-K, which reported under Item 9 the press release entitled “Vixel Corporation Announces Second Quarter 2003 Financial Results” relating to the financial results of the quarter ended June 29, 2003.

25

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

26

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX