Back to GetFilings.com

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

	x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002

Commission file number 1-13498

ASSISTED LIVING CONCEPTS, INC.

11835 NE Glenn Widing Drive, Building E

Securities Registered Pursuant To Section 12(b) of The Act:

Securities Registered Pursuant To Section 12(g) of The Act:

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.     Yes x     No o

      Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K:     x

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).     Yes o     No x

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.     Yes x     No o

      The aggregate market value of the voting stock and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to average bid and asked price ($3.00) as reported through the OTCBB as of the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter (June 28, 2002), was $13.0 million.

      The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock as of March 20, 2003 was 6,431,759 shares.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

      The Registrant has incorporated into Part III of Form 10-K, by reference, portions of its Proxy Statement for its 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

PART I

      Except as otherwise noted, references in this report to “ALC,” the “Company,” “us” or “we” refer to Assisted Living Concepts, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Item 1.     Business

Overview

      We operate, own and lease freestanding assisted living residences. These residences are primarily located in small, middle-market, rural and suburban communities with a population typically ranging from 10,000 to 40,000. As of December 31, 2002 we had operations in 14 states. Upon the completion of a pending sale of our 9 facilities located in South Carolina, our operations will be limited to 13 states.

      We provide personal care and support services and make available routine nursing services (as permitted by applicable law) designed to meet the personal and health care needs of our residents. We believe that this combination of residential, personal care, support and health care services provides a cost-efficient alternative to, and affords an independent lifestyle for, individuals who do not require the broader array of medical services that nursing facilities are required by law to provide.

      We experienced significant and rapid growth between 1994 and 1998, primarily through the development of assisted living residences and, to a much lesser extent, through acquisition of assisted living residences, opening our last twenty residences in 1999. At the completion of our initial public offering in November 1994 we had an operating base of five leased residences located in Oregon. As of December 31, 2002, we operated 178 assisted living residences (6,883 units) of which we owned 123 residences (4,778 units) and leased 55 residences (2,105 units). At December 31, 2002, we had an occupancy rate of 87.3% and an average combined monthly rate for rent and services of $2,213 per unit.

      The principal elements of our business strategy are to:

	•	increase occupancy and improve operating efficiencies at our residences;
	•	increase rental and service revenue;
	•	reduce overhead costs as a percentage of revenue; and
	•	improve financial strength through reduction of debt and refinancing of debt.

      We anticipate that the majority of our revenues will continue to come from private pay sources. However, we believe that by having located some of our residences in states with favorable regulatory and reimbursement climates, we should have a stable source of residents eligible for Medicaid reimbursement to the extent that private pay residents are not available and, in addition, provide our private pay residents with alternative sources of income if their private funds are depleted and they become Medicaid eligible.

      Although we manage the mix of private paying tenants and Medicaid paying tenants residing in our facilities, any significant increase in our Medicaid population could have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows, particularly if the states operating these programs continue to limit, or more aggressively seek limits on, reimbursement rates. See “Forward-looking statements and factors affecting our business and prospects — We depend on reimbursement by government payors and other third parties for a significant portion of our revenues” included in Item 7.

      Assisted Living Concepts, Inc., is a Nevada corporation. Our principal executive offices are located at 11835 NE Glenn Widing Drive, Building E, Portland, Oregon 97220-9057, and our telephone number is (503) 252-6233.

Reorganization

      On October 1, 2001, Assisted Living Concepts, Inc. (the “Company”), and its wholly owned subsidiary, Carriage House Assisted Living, Inc. voluntarily filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, as amended (the “Bankruptcy Code”). The bankruptcy court gave final

1

      Under the Plan, on the Effective Date, the Company issued general unsecured creditors their pro rata shares, subject to the reserve described below, of the following securities:

	•	$40.25 million principal amount of 10% senior secured notes, due January 1, 2009 (the “Senior Secured Notes”);
	•	$15.25 million principal amount of junior secured notes, due January 1, 2012 (the “Junior Secured Notes”); and
	•	6.24 million shares of new common stock (representing 96% of the new common stock).

      The Senior Secured Notes and the Junior Secured Notes (collectively the “New Notes”) were secured by 57 of our properties. Five of these properties were sold in 2002, and all of the net proceeds of that sale were used to redeem a portion of the Senior Secured Notes as required by the Senior Indenture.

      The remaining 4% of the new common stock, subject to the Reserve, was issued on the Effective Date to the Company’s shareholders immediately prior to the Effective Date.

      Under the Plan, 1.1% of the Senior Secured Notes, Junior Secured Notes and new common stock that would otherwise have been issued on the Effective Date were held back as a reserve (the “Reserve”) to cover general unsecured claims that had not been either made or settled by the December 19, 2001 cutoff date established under the Plan. The reserved securities will be issued once all these outstanding general unsecured claims have been settled. If the Reserve is insufficient to cover these outstanding general unsecured claims, we will have no further liability with respect to these claims. If the Reserve exceeds the amount of these outstanding general unsecured claims, the excess securities in the Reserve will be distributed pro rata among the holders of all general unsecured claims, including those settled prior to the cutoff date.

      We adopted fresh-start reporting, as of December 31, 2001, in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 90-7, Financial Reporting By Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code (SOP 90-7). Under fresh-starting reporting, a new entity has been deemed created for financial reporting purposes. See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this report for additional information.

Management Changes

      On the Effective Date, a new Board of Directors of the reorganized Company consisting of seven members was established as follows: W. Andrew Adams (Chairman), Andre Dimitriadis, Mark Holliday, Richard Ladd, Matthew Patrick, Leonard Tannenbaum, and Wm. James Nicol, then the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

      In February 2002, Steven L. Vick replaced Wm. James Nicol as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a Director. In May 2002, Matthew Patrick replaced Drew Q. Miller as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary. Mr. Vick and Mr. Patrick also serve as Directors of the Company.

      In June 2002, we eliminated the positions held by Nancy Gorshe and Sandra Campbell, both of whom were senior officers of the Company. As a result of eliminating these positions, we entered into Separation Agreements and Mutual General Releases with Ms. Gorshe and Ms. Campbell under which, pursuant to their employment agreements, Ms. Gorshe and Ms. Campbell will receive severance payments totaling $420,000 which are being paid over twelve months. In August 2002, Linda Martin joined the Company as Chief Operating Officer.

      In November 2002, Mr. Dimitriadis resigned from the audit committee due to his related party status, as defined under the emerging rules of Sarbanes-Oxley, arising from his position as an executive of one of the Company’s landlords. Mr. Dimitriadis continues to serve as a director of the Company. As a result of Mr. Dimitriadis’ resignation, the Company’s Board of Directors appointed Mark Holliday, a current director and member of the audit committee, as chair and appointed Richard Ladd, a current director, as a member of the audit committee.

2

Services

      Our residences offer residents a supportive, “home-like” setting and assistance with activities of daily living. Residents are individuals who, for a variety of reasons, cannot live alone, or elect not to do so, and do not need the 24-hour skilled medical care provided in nursing facilities. We design services provided to these residents to respond to their individual needs and to improve their quality of life. This individualized assistance is available 24 hours a day and includes routine health-related services, which are made available and are provided according to the resident’s individual needs and state regulatory requirements. Available services include:

	•	General services, such as meals, laundry and housekeeping;
	•	Support services, such as assistance with medication, monitoring health status, coordination of transportation; and
	•	Personal care, such as dressing, grooming and bathing.

      We also provide or arrange access to additional services beyond basic housing and related services, including physical therapy and pharmacy services.

      Although a typical package of basic services provided to a resident includes meals, housekeeping, laundry and personal care, we do not have a standard service package for all residents. Instead, we are able to accommodate the changing needs of our residents through the use of individual service plans and flexible staffing patterns. Our multi-tiered rate structure for services is based upon the acuity of, or level of services needed by, each resident. Supplemental and specialized health-related services for those residents requiring 24-hour supervision or more extensive assistance with activities of daily living are provided by third-party providers who are reimbursed directly by the resident or a third-party payor (such as Medicaid or long-term care insurance). Our policy is to assess the level of need of each resident regularly.

Operations

      Each residence has an on-site administrator who is responsible for the overall day-to-day operation of the residence, including quality of care, marketing, social services and financial performance. The administrator is assisted by professional and non-professional personnel, some of whom may be independent providers or part-time personnel, including nurses, personal service assistants, maintenance and kitchen personnel. The nursing hours vary depending on the residents’ needs. We consult with outside providers, such as registered nurses, pharmacists, and dietitians, for purposes of medication review, menu planning and responding to any special dietary needs of residents. Personal service assistants who primarily are full-time employees are responsible for personal care, dietary services, housekeeping and laundry services. Maintenance services are performed by full and part-time employees.

      We have an infrastructure that includes 3 division vice presidents of operations who each oversee the overall performance of a geographic division, 13 regional directors of operations who oversee the day-to-day operations of 4 to 25 residences, and team leaders who provide peer support for subgroups of residences. We also have regional property managers who oversee the maintenance of the residences and several regional marketing coordinators who assist with marketing the residences. Corporate home office (“Home Office”) and regional personnel work with the administrators to establish residence goals and strategies, quality assurance oversight, development of our internal policies and procedures, government relations, marketing and sales, community relations, development and implementation of new programs, cash management, legal support, treasury functions, and human resource management.

Competition

      The long-term care industry generally is highly competitive. We expect that the assisted living business, in particular, will become even more competitive in the future given the relatively low barriers to entry and continuing health care cost containment pressures.

3

      We compete with numerous other companies providing similar long-term care alternatives. We operate in 14 states and each community in which we operate provides a unique market. Overall, most of our markets include an assisted living competitor offering assisted living facilities that are similar in size, price and range of service. Our competitors include other companies that provide adult day care in the home, higher priced assisted living centers (typically larger facilities with more amenities), congregate care facilities where tenants elect the services to be provided, and continuing care retirement centers on campus-like settings.

      We expect to face increased competition from new market entrants as assisted living receives increased attention and the number of states which include assisted living in their Medicaid programs increases. Competition will also grow from new market entrants, including publicly and privately held companies focusing primarily on assisted living. Nursing facilities that provide long-term care services are also a potential source of competition for us. Providers of assisted living residences compete for residents primarily on the basis of quality of care, price, reputation, physical appearance of the facilities, services offered, family preferences, physician referrals and location. Some of our competitors operate on a not-for-profit basis or as charitable organizations. Some of our competitors are significantly larger than us and have, or may obtain, substantially greater resources than ours. While we generally believe that there is moderate competition for less expensive segments of the private market and for Medicaid residents in small communities, we have seen an increase in competition in certain of our markets.

      We believe that many assisted living markets have been overbuilt. Regulation and other barriers to entry into the assisted living industry are not substantial. In addition, because the segment of the population that can afford to pay our daily resident fee is finite, the number of new assisted living facilities may outpace demand in some markets. The effects of such overbuilding include (a) significantly longer fill-up periods, (b) newly opened facilities attract residents from existing facilities, (c) pressure to lower or refrain from increasing rates, (d) competition for workers in already tight labor markets and (e) lower margins until excess units are absorbed.

      We believe that each local market is different, and we are and will continue to react in a variety of ways, to the specific competitive environment that exists in each market. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete effectively in those markets where overbuilding exists, or that future overbuilding in other markets where we operate our residences will not adversely affect our operations.

Funding

      Assisted living residents or their families generally pay the cost of care from their own financial resources. Depending on the nature of an individual’s health insurance program or long-term care insurance policy, the individual may receive reimbursement for costs of care under an “assisted living,” “custodial” or “alternative care benefit.” Government payments for assisted living have been limited. Some state and local governments offer subsidies for rent or services for low-income elders. Others may provide subsidies in the form of additional payments for those who receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI). Medicaid provides coverage for certain financially or medically needy persons, regardless of age, and is funded jointly by federal, state and local governments. Medicaid contracts for assisted living vary from state to state.

      In 1981, the federal government approved a Medicaid waiver program called Home and Community Based Care which was designed to permit states to develop programs specific to the healthcare and housing needs of the low-income elderly eligible for nursing home placement (a “Medicaid Waiver Program”). In 1986, Oregon became the first state to use federal funding for licensed assisted living services through a Medicaid Waiver Program authorized by the Center for Medicaid Services (“CMS”), formerly the Health Care Financing Administration. Under a Medicaid Waiver Program, states apply to CMS for a waiver to use Medicaid funds to support community-based options for the low-income elderly who need long-term care. These waivers permit states to reallocate a portion of Medicaid funding for nursing facility care to other forms of care such as assisted living. In 1994, the federal government implemented new regulations which empowered states to further expand their Medicaid Waiver Programs and eliminated restrictions on the amount of Medicaid funding states could allocate to community-based care, such as assisted living. Certain states including Oregon, New Jersey, Texas, Arizona, Nebraska, Idaho and Washington currently have

4

      During the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002, direct payments received from state Medicaid agencies accounted for approximately 11.1%, 12.5%, and 12.8% respectively, of our revenue while the tenant-paid portion received from Medicaid residents accounted for approximately 6.2%, 6.8%, and 7.5% respectively, of our revenue during these periods. We expect in the future that state Medicaid reimbursement programs will continue to constitute a significant source of our revenue, however in 2003 there have been, and we expect that there will continue to be, proposals to reduce the federal and state budget deficits by limiting Medicaid reimbursement in general. If any of these proposals are adopted at either the federal or the state level, such adoptions could have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Government Regulation

      Our assisted living residences are subject to certain state statutes, rules and regulations, including those which provide for licensing requirements. In order to qualify as a state licensed facility, our residences must comply with regulations, which address, among other things, staffing, physical design, required services and resident characteristics. As of December 31, 2002, we had obtained licenses in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Nebraska, Texas, Arizona, Iowa, Louisiana, Ohio, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Michigan and South Carolina. We are currently subject to state licensure requirements for only one of our 20 residences in Indiana. Our residences are also subject to various local building codes and other ordinances, including fire safety codes. These requirements vary from state to state and are monitored to varying degrees by state agencies.

      As a provider of services under the Medicaid program in the United States, we are subject to Medicaid fraud and abuse laws, which prohibit any bribe, kickback, rebate or remuneration of any kind in return for the referral of Medicaid patients, or to induce the purchasing, leasing, ordering or arranging of any goods or services to be paid for by Medicaid. Violations of these laws may result in civil and criminal penalties and exclusions from participation in the Medicaid program. The Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services issued “safe harbor” regulations specifying certain business practices, which are exempt from sanctions under the fraud and abuse law. Several states in which we operate have laws that prohibit certain direct or indirect payments or fee-splitting arrangements between health care providers if such arrangements are designed to induce or encourage the referral of patients to a particular provider. We, at all times, attempt to comply with all applicable fraud and abuse laws. There can be no assurance that administrative or judicial interpretation of existing laws or regulations or enactment of new laws or regulations will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

      Currently, the federal government does not regulate assisted living residences as such. State standards required of assisted living providers are less in comparison with those required of other licensed health care operators. Current Medicaid regulations provide for comparatively flexible state control over the licensure and regulation of assisted living residences. There can be no assurance that federal regulations governing the operation of assisted living residences will not be implemented in the future or that existing state regulations will not be expanded.

      In 1996, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) law created comprehensive new requirements regarding the confidentiality of medical information that is or has been electronically transmitted or maintained. The Department of Health and Human Services has enacted regulations implementing the law, and we are currently working to improve our practices for maintaining and transmitting healthcare information for our residents in order to comply with these regulations. The compliance deadline for the Privacy Standards is April 14, 2003 and the compliance deadline for the Security Standards is October 16, 2003. Sanctions for failing to comply with HIPAA include criminal penalties and civil sanctions.

5

      Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, all places of public accommodation are required to meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Although we believe that our facilities are substantially in compliance with, or are exempt from, present requirements, we will incur additional costs if required changes involve a greater expenditure than anticipated or must be made on a more accelerated basis than anticipated. Further legislation may impose additional burdens or restrictions with respect to access by disabled persons, the costs of compliance with which could be substantial.

      Forward looking statements and factors affecting our business and prospects, “We are subject to significant government regulation.”

Liability And Insurance

      Providing services in the senior living industry involves an inherent risk of liability. Participants in the senior living and long-term care industry are subject to lawsuits alleging negligence and related legal theories, many of which may involve large claims and result in the incurrence of significant legal defense costs. We currently maintain insurance policies to cover such risks in amounts which we believe are consistent with industry practice. There can be no assurance that a claim in excess of our insurance will not be asserted. If a lawsuit or claim arises which ultimately results in an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits, such an outcome could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

      Based on poor loss experience, insurers for the long term care industry have become increasingly wary of liability exposures. A number of insurance carriers have stopped writing coverage to this market, and those remaining have increased premiums and deductibles substantially. While nursing homes have been primarily affected, assisted living companies, including us, have experienced significant premium and deductible increases. During the claim year ended December 31, 2002, our professional liability insurance coverage included retention levels of $250,000 per incident for all states except Florida and Texas in which our retention level was $500,000. Our professional liability insurance is on a claims-made basis. In certain states, particularly Texas, many long-term care providers are experiencing difficulty in renewing their insurance policies. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain liability insurance in the future or that, if such insurance is available, it will be available on terms acceptable to us.

Employees

      As of December 31, 2002 we had 3,567 employees, of whom 1,726 were full-time employees and 1,841 were part-time employees. None of our employees are represented by any labor union. We believe that our labor relations are generally good.

      The following chart sets forth, as of December 31, 2002, the location, number of units, opening date, ownership status and occupancy of our residences.

6

7

8

9