Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

     
[X]   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
    For the fiscal year ended:    December 31, 2002

or

     
[   ]   TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
    For the transition period from      to      

Commission file number: 0-27938

COLUMBIA BANCORP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
    93-1193156
Oregon   (I.R.S. Employer
(State of incorporation)   Identification No.)

401 East Third Street, Suite 200
The Dalles, Oregon 97058
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number: (541) 298-6649

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common stock, no par value

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes  [X]   No  [ ]

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).   Yes  [X]   No  [ ]

     The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the stock was sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such stock, as of February 18, 2003 was $118,351,530.

     The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity as of the latest practicable date: 7,890,102 shares of no par value common stock on February 18, 2003.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

     Portions of the Registrant’s proxy statement dated March 10, 2003 for the 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“Proxy Statement”) are incorporated by reference in Part III hereof.

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Part I
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Part II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 7A QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 8 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 9 CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
PART III
ITEM 10 DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
ITEM 11 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND REPORT OF COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
ITEM 12 SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
ITEM 13 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
ITEM 14 CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Part IV
ITEM 15 EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
SIGNATURES
Exhibit 10.1(a)
Exhibit 10.3(a)
Exhibit 10.4(a)
Exhibit 10.11
Exhibit 10.12
Exhibit 10.13
Exhibit 10.14
Exhibit 10.15
Exhibit 10.16
Exhibit 10.17
Exhibit 10.18
Exhibit 10.19
Exhibit 10.20
Exhibit 10.21
Exhibit 10.22
Exhibit 13.1
Exhibit 21.1
Exhibit 99.1
Exhibit 99.2


Table of Contents

COLUMBIA BANCORP
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS

             
        PAGE
       
Disclosure Regarding Forward Looking Statements     3  
PART I            
Item 1.   Description of Business     3-10  
Item 2.   Properties     10-11  
Item 3.   Legal Proceedings     11  
Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders     11  
PART II            
Item 5.   Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters     12  
Item 6.   Selected Financial Data     12  
Item 7.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations     13-31  
Item 7A.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk     32  
Item 8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data     33-57  
Item 9.   Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure     58  
PART III            
    (Items 10 through 13 are incorporated by reference from Columbia Bancorp’s definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 24, 2003)        
Item 10.   Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant     58  
Item 11.   Executive Compensation and Report of Compensation Committee     58  
Item 12.   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management     58  
Item 13.   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions     58  
Item 14.   Controls and Procedures     58  
PART IV            
Item 15.   Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K     59-62  
SIGNATURES         63  

 


Table of Contents

DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

     This report, particularly including the section entitled Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains a number of forward-looking statements about our anticipated business, operations, financial performance and cash flows. Statements in this report that relate to future plans, events and circumstances are provided to describe management’s intentions and expectations based on currently available information, and readers should not construe these statements as assurances or guarantees. As with any predictions, these statements are inherently difficult to make with any degree of assurance, and actual results may differ materially and adversely from management’s expectations described herein. Likewise, management’s plans described in this report may not come to pass because unforeseen events may force management to deviate from its expressed intentions. Forward-looking statements often can be identified by the use of predictive or prospective terms such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “plan,” “intend,” and words of similar construction or meaning. Some of the events or circumstances that may cause our actual results to deviate from management’s expectations include the impact of competition and local and regional economic factors upon our customer base, our deposits and our loan portfolio; economic and regulatory limits on our ability to grow our assets and manage our business; interest rate fluctuations that may adversely impact our revenues and expenses; and, the impact of impairment charges upon our intangible and other assets. Other factors that may adversely impact our performance are discussed in the section entitled Management’s Discussion and Analysis of financial condition and Results of Operations – Factors that May Affect Future Results of Operations as well as other disclosures we make from time to time in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers also should note that forward-looking statements expressed in this report are made as of the date this report is filed and management cannot undertake to update those statements to reflect future events or circumstances.

Part I

ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

General

     Columbia Bancorp (“Columbia”) is a financial holding company organized under Oregon Law in 1996. Columbia is headquartered in The Dalles, Oregon, with two subsidiaries, Columbia River Bank (“CRB”) and Columbia Bancorp Trust I. CRB is a 17 branch, state-chartered institution authorized to provide banking services in the states of Oregon and Washington. Columbia offers a broad range of financial services to its customers, primarily small and medium sized businesses, farmers, and individuals. Columbia’s 12 full-service branch facilities and three limited-service branch facilities in Oregon serve the northern and eastern Oregon communities of The Dalles, Hood River, Pendleton and Hermiston, the central Oregon communities of Madras, Redmond, and Bend, and the communities of McMinnville, Canby and Newberg in the Willamette Valley. Columbia’s two south central Washington full-service branches serve the communities of Goldendale and White Salmon.

     As of December 31, 2002, Columbia had total assets of $544.33 million, total deposits of $455.84 million, and stockholders’ equity of $50.19 million. Columbia’s net income for the year ended December 31, 2002, was $9.38 million, which was Columbia’s 15th consecutive year of increasingly higher net income.

     From its origins as a one-branch bank in The Dalles, Oregon, Columbia has grown as a result of merger and acquisition activity, new branch openings, the introduction of new business lines and the expansion and cross-marketing of its existing products and community-bank lending expertise.

     In 1995, CRB merged with Juniper Banking Company. In 1996, Columbia was formed as CRB’s holding company and Columbia acquired Washington-based Klickitat Valley Bank.

     In 1997, Columbia created a division of CRB to originate conventional residential mortgage loans for the primary purpose of selling to the secondary market. The division, known as Columbia River Bank Mortgage Group (“CRB Mortgage Group”), has grown its business substantially since its inception. The CRB Mortgage Group

 


Table of Contents

operates its primary administrative operations from facilities in Bend, Oregon, but also offers its products at all of Columbia’s Oregon and Washington branches. It also offers wholesale mortgage loan services directly to other retail Mortgage companies. Further growth in 1997 came from CRB’s opening of a branch in Bend, Oregon.

     In 1998, CRB opened a new branch in Hermiston, Oregon and Columbia completed the acquisition of Valley Community Bancorp. During 1999, CRB opened new branches in Pendleton and Newberg, Oregon, and a second Bend, Oregon branch. In April 2000, Columbia River BankNet, CRB’s Internet-based banking product, was introduced.

     In 2001, CRB opened a new branch in Canby, Oregon and a limited-service banking facility in a McMinnville, Oregon retirement community as well as a mortgage lending office in Newport, Oregon. In 2002, CRB opened a limited-service banking facility in a Bend, Oregon retirement community. Collectively, these growth activities have enabled Columbia to diversify its loan portfolio and operating risks over several market areas and local economies although our markets are located primarily in South Central Washington and Central Oregon.

     On December 19, 2002, Columbia formed Columbia Bancorp Trust I (“Trust”), a wholly-owned Delaware statutory business trust, for purposes of issuing Trust Preferred Securities. The Trust issued $4.0 million of beneficial interest in junior subordinated debentures at a floating rate indexed to the 90 day LIBOR with a margin of 3.30%. These securities are considered to be Tier I for regulatory capital purposes.

     The markets in which Columbia operates are economically diverse and therefore pose both opportunities and challenges to a community bank operating in varied economies. Columbia’s approach to meeting the challenge is to staff its branches and business groups with managers who are established in their communities and have developed a loyal customer following. Columbia’s senior management, in conjunction with branch managers, review the operations of each branch to determine which products and services are best suited to that geographic region. The diverse economies also provide opportunities to limit Columbia’s exposure to adverse market conditions in any one economic sector.

Business Strategy

     Columbia’s strategy is to continue building on its position as a leading community-based provider of financial services in Oregon and Washington. The key to the success of this strategy, in Columbia’s view, is to continue to provide exceptional personal service to the communities it now serves, and to successfully expand into new communities by identifying and meeting their unique financial services needs. Columbia’s target branch locations are in non-metropolitan regions, where it aims to deliver prompt and friendly personal financial services. The components of Columbia’s business strategy are outlined below.

     Successfully operate in non-metropolitan regions. Columbia believes that the key to profitability is to maintain and open branches in non-metropolitan communities and to: (i) provide a high level of service to the customer; (ii) staff branches with employees who have established ties to the community; (iii) attract and retain a highly skilled management team; and, (iv) allow branch personnel the flexibility to emphasize products and services which best fit their local economy. In addition, by decentralizing a portion of the management function to the branch level, Columbia believes it can make business decisions regarding customers more quickly and with added value than its major banking competitors. Columbia believes it is able to profitably attract and retain customers by providing and delivering products and services tailored to their individual needs, and by delivering them with a high degree of personal attention.

     Maintain high asset quality. Columbia seeks to maintain high asset quality through a program that includes prompt and strict adherence to established credit policies combined with training and supervision of lending officers. Additionally, Columbia uses incentives to maintain high asset quality, including tying a portion of its loan officers compensation to the quality of the loans they originate. Columbia also believes that its commitment to hire branch managers with long-term ties to their communities is of significant assistance in determining the quality of loan transactions it receives. The variety of economies in which Columbia’s branches are located increases the diversification and, in Columbia’s opinion, the strength of the overall loan portfolio.

 


Table of Contents

Products and Services

Consumer Distribution Channels

     Columbia offers a broad range of deposit and loan products and services tailored to meet the banking requirements of consumers in Columbia’s market areas. These include:

     Retail Bank Products and Services. Columbia’s consumer deposit products include numerous noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing checking accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, and certificates of deposit. The interest-bearing accounts generally are priced at rates established by management based on competitive market factors, management’s desire to increase certain types or maturities of deposit liabilities and liquidity requirements. Columbia strives to establish customer relations to attract core deposits in noninterest-bearing transactional accounts, which reduces its cost of funds. Columbia provides loans to individual borrowers for a variety of purposes, including secured and unsecured personal loans, home equity and personal lines of credit, and motor vehicle loans.

     CRB Mortgage Group Products and Services. Columbia offers a complete range of mortgage banking services including loans for single-family owner occupied homes, construction to permanent financing packages and mortgages for vacation and rental homes. Customers can choose between fixed, variable and balloon rate options. Construction loans are available through the conventional two-step process or through a construction to permanent basis. Junior lien financing is also offered as a single product or in combination with a first mortgage. An added benefit offered through CRB Mortgage Group is the ability for customers to access rates and terms not normally available from other financial institutions, through alternative secondary market outlets.

     CRB Financial Services Products and Services. Through arrangements with Primevest Financial Services, Inc., (“Primevest”) a registered securities broker-dealer, Columbia offers a wide range of non-Federal Deposit Insurance Company (“FDIC”) insured financial products and services to consumers. These include stocks, mutual funds, traditional and Roth IRAs, SEPs, tax-sheltered annuities, life insurance, and other financial products. Representatives also offer retirement planning services. Columbia receives a portion of the commissions generated from financial product sales.

     Technology-Based Products and Services. Columbia uses both traditional and new technology to support its focus on personal service. These include a VISA credit and check card (debit card) program; ATMs at each of Columbia’s full-service branches, including 15 on-site ATMs and five off-site ATMs; and, a telephone banking service that allows customers to speak directly with a customer service representative during normal banking hours or 24-hour telephone access to their accounts. In addition, Columbia, through its web site, offers BankNet, the Internet banking service, which allows access to account information as well as the ability to view checks and use other services in an on-line environment.

Commercial Distribution Channels

     Columbia has an experienced lending staff, who have special expertise in small business, agricultural and real estate lending. Columbia’s loan officers emphasize continuing contact with business customers after loans are made. Columbia believes that its business customers appreciate the ongoing relationship they develop with their local lending officer. Such relationship-based banking is an important aspect of Columbia’s continuous effort to maintain high asset quality.

     Commercial Loans. Columbia offers to its commercial customers customized loans including equipment and inventory financing, operational lines of credit, SBA loans for qualified businesses, and accounts receivable financing. A significant portion of Columbia’s loan portfolio consists of commercial loans. For regulatory reporting purposes, a portion of Columbia’s commercial loans are designated as real estate loans because they are secured by real property, although these loans may finance accounts receivable, equipment and inventory purchases, or other commercial activities. Lending decisions are based on careful evaluation of the financial strength, management, and credit history of the borrower and the quality of the collateral securing the loan. Commercial loans secured by real

 


Table of Contents

property are generally limited to 75% of the value of the collateral. Columbia typically requires personal guarantees and relies on the identification of secondary sources of repayment.

     Agricultural Loans. Columbia provides loans including production lines of credit, equipment financing, and term loans for capital improvements and other business purposes to agricultural businesses. Agricultural loans are generally secured by crops, equipment, and inventory, as well as real estate. Agricultural lending can require significant follow-up time, as farmers request budgeting assistance and other financial advice. Columbia employs two agricultural loan consultants with decades of farm lending experience, to assist its loan officers in loan processing and administration. Columbia’s loan officers, many of whom are graduates of the Western Agricultural School in Pullman, Washington, make frequent visits to farming operation sites, regularly attend agricultural lending programs and seminars, and actively participate in growers’ associations and other agricultural-based organizations.

     Real Estate Loans. Real estate loans are available for the construction, purchase, or refinance of commercial and rental properties. Columbia also provides financing to high quality land developers, and speculative and pre-sold financing to contractors. Borrowers can choose from a variety of fixed and adjustable rate options and terms.

     Columbia’s real estate loans are in large part loans to commercial customers, farmers and ranchers and are secured by the properties used in their businesses. The majority of these loans have a variable rate feature with adjustment periods varying from one to five years. Insofar as payments on real estate loans depend on the successful operation and management of the businesses and properties securing the loans, repayment can be affected by local real estate market and economic conditions. Fluctuating land values and local economic conditions can make loans secured by real property difficult to evaluate and monitor.

     Government-Assisted Loan Programs. Columbia’s loan officers make loans to small businesses and to farmers that are supported by guarantees issued by various state and federal government agencies. Columbia is active in the SBA 7-A and 504 programs, and in similar programs offered by the Farm Services Agency (formerly the Farmers Home Administration) and by Oregon Economic and Community Development Department. The government guarantees a portion of these loans, which reduces risk in Columbia’s loan portfolio.

     Services to Non-Profits and Public Entities. Columbia offers a general array of loan products to borrowers in the non-profit and public entity sector, including city and county governments, together with special programs, such as jumbo CDs and low-cost loan programs. Columbia also offers consumer services to nonprofit and public sector employees, such as Columbia VISA card enrollment and direct deposit services.

     For all of its loans, Columbia at all times seeks to maintain sound loan underwriting standards with written loan policies, appropriate individual and branch limits, and loan administration committee reviews. In the case of particularly large loan commitments or loan participations, loans are reviewed by a loan committee of CRB’s Board of Directors. Underwriting standards are designed to achieve a high-quality loan portfolio, compliance with lending regulations and the desired mix of loan maturities and industry concentrations. Management seeks to minimize credit losses by closely monitoring the financial condition of its borrowers and the value of collateral.

     Cash Management Services. Columbia also offers to business customers an opportunity to meet additional banking needs online through its Cash Management product. This online product gives business customers the ability to process payroll, collections, wire transfers, and Electronic Funds Transfer tax payments.

     Deposit and Related Products. Columbia’s business deposit products include basic, regular, and interest-bearing checking accounts, business money market accounts and sweep accounts. Columbia also offers check verification services to merchants allowing them the ability to determine, on a 24-hour basis, whether a check drawn on an account has sufficient funds to cover the amount drawn. In addition, Columbia offers a VISA merchant program for business customers.

     Investment Products. Columbia’s affiliation with Primevest allows it to offer non-FDIC insured financial products and services to Columbia’s business customers as well as to consumers. These include insurance and annuity products, and employee retirement plan products such as SEPs, IRAs and 401(k) plans.

 


Table of Contents

Principal Markets of Operation

     Columbia accepts deposits at its branches in Wasco, Hood River, Jefferson, Deschutes, Clackamas, Yamhill and Umatilla Counties in Oregon and Klickitat County in Washington. Columbia makes loans in all of these counties and in adjacent counties including Sherman, Gilliam, and Crook counties in Oregon and Skamania County in Washington. Many of its products and services, including investment products through Primevest and mortgages through CRB’s Mortgage Group, are offered and sold throughout Oregon and south central Washington. Columbia’s ability to increase its market share in the communities it serves is driven by a marketing plan consisting of several key components. A principal objective is to create and foster a sales culture in each branch and department. Employees are trained to cross-sell, offering appropriate products and services to existing customers and expanding business relationships. Columbia regularly examines the desirability and profitability of adding new products and services to those currently offered. Columbia also promotes specific products by media advertising, but relies primarily on referrals and direct contacts for new business. Columbia recognizes the importance of community service and supports employee involvement in community activities. This participation allows Columbia to make a contribution to the communities it serves, which management believes increases Columbia’s visibility in its markets and thereby increases business opportunities.

     Columbia does business in many different non-metropolitan communities. Management believes the diverse assortment of customers, communities, and economic sectors that Columbia serves are a source of strength. In addition, as a community banking organization Columbia has certain competitive advantages because of its local focus. However, Columbia is also more reliant on the local economies in its market areas than are super-regional and national banks.

Competition

     Columbia’s competitors for deposits are banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, money market funds, issuers of corporate and government securities, insurance companies, brokerage firms, mutual funds, and other financial intermediaries. Columbia’s business model is to compete on the basis of customer service and not solely on price. Columbia competes for deposits by offering a variety of deposit accounts at rates generally competitive with financial institutions in the area.

     Columbia’s competition for loans comes principally from banks, savings and loan associations, mortgage companies, finance companies, insurance companies, credit unions, and other institutional lenders. An important competitor for agricultural loans is Farm Credit Services. Columbia competes for loan originations through the level of interest rates and loan fees charged, its array of commercial and mortgage loan products, and the efficiency and quality of services provided to borrowers. Lending activity can also be affected by the availability of lendable funds, local and national economic conditions, current interest rate levels, and loan demand. As described above, Columbia competes with the larger commercial banks by emphasizing a community bank orientation and efficient personal service to customers.

     A potential new source of competition is the array of on-line banking services offered by traditional commercial banks and other financial service providers, and by newly formed companies that use the Internet to advertise and sell competing products. Columbia offers many on-line banking services to its customers, but management believes that, for the foreseeable future, its customers will continue to prefer the personal, locally-based services that it offers.

Employees

     As of December 31, 2002, Columbia had a total of 274 full-time equivalent employees. This number of employees, which compares to 273 at December 31, 2001, has held steady due to increased efficiencies in administrative functions and expansion of technology. None of the employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. Columbia considers its relationships with its employees to be good.

 


Table of Contents

SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

General

     Columbia is extensively regulated under federal and state law. These laws and regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors, not stockholders. The discussion below describes and summarizes certain statutes and regulations. These descriptions and summaries are qualified in their entirety by reference to the particular statute or regulation. Changes in applicable laws or regulations may have a material effect on the business and prospects of Columbia. The operations of Columbia may also be affected by changes in the policies of banking and other government regulators. Columbia cannot accurately predict the nature or extent of the effects on its business and earnings that fiscal or monetary policies, or new federal or state laws, may have in the future.

Website Access to Reports

     Columbia makes available all periodic and current reports, free of charge, on its website as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Columbia’s website address is . The contents of the website are not incorporated into this report or into Columbia’s other filings with the SEC.

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act

     In 1999 Congress passed the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act (the “FSMA”). This new legislation repealed certain provisions of the Glass-Steagall Act that had required the separation of the banking, insurance and securities businesses. It also created a new business structure known as a financial services holding company. Under this new law, banks will have broader opportunities to affiliate with insurance and securities companies. Banks could also become tempting acquisition targets, as insurance and securities companies seek such affiliations themselves. The FSMA may also encourage local jurisdictions to enact tighter bank privacy provisions. The enactment and implementation of the FSMA will result in new competitive challenges and opportunities for community banks in the coming years.

     Columbia is a financial services holding company under the FSMA and is therefore subject to supervision of, and regulation by, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”). Columbia is examined by, must file annual reports with, and provide the Federal Reserve with any additional information as it may require. Financial holding companies are bank holding companies that satisfy certain criteria and are permitted to engage in activities that traditional bank holding companies are not.

     Holding Company Bank Ownership. The Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (“the BHCA”) requires every bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before (i) acquiring, directly or indirectly, ownership or control of any voting shares of another bank or bank holding company if, after such acquisition, it would own or control more than 5% of such shares, (ii) acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of another bank or bank holding company, or (iii) merging or consolidating with another bank or bank holding company.

     Holding Company Control of Nonbanks. With some exceptions, the BHCA also prohibits a bank holding company from acquiring or retaining direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any company which is not a bank or bank holding company, or from engaging directly or indirectly in activities other than those of banking, managing, or controlling banks, or providing services for its subsidiaries. The principal exceptions to these prohibitions involve certain nonbank activities which, by statute or by Federal Reserve regulation or order, have been identified as activities closely related to the business of banking or of managing or controlling banks. In making this determination, the Federal Reserve considers whether the performance of such activities by a bank holding company can be expected to produce benefits to the public such as greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in the efficient use of resources, which can be expected to outweigh the risks of possible adverse effects such as decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interest, or unsound banking practices. The Economic Growth and Regulatory Reduction Act of 1996 amended the BHCA to eliminate the requirement that bank holding companies seek prior Federal Reserve approval before engaging in certain permissible nonbanking activities

 


Table of Contents

if the holding company is well capitalized and meets certain other specific criteria.

     Transactions with Affiliates. Subsidiary banks of a bank holding company are subject to restrictions imposed by the Federal Reserve Act on extensions of credit to the holding company or its subsidiaries, on investments in their securities, and on the use of their securities as collateral for loans to any borrower. These regulations and restrictions may limit Columbia’s ability to obtain funds from CRB for its cash needs, including funds for payment of dividends, interest, and operational expenses.

     Tying Arrangements. Under the Federal Reserve Act and certain regulations of the Federal Reserve, a bank holding company and its subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in certain tying arrangements in connection with any extension of credit, lease or sale of property, or furnishing of services. For example, CRB may not generally require a customer to obtain other services from it or from Columbia, and may not require that the customer promise not to obtain other services from a competitor as a condition to an extension of credit to the customer.

Federal and State Bank Regulation

     General. CRB is an Oregon state-chartered bank with deposits insured by the FDIC, and is subject to the supervision and regulation of the Oregon Director of Banks and the FDIC. CRB is also subject to the supervision and regulation of the Washington Department of Financial Institutions. These agencies have the authority to prohibit banks from engaging in what they believe constitute unsafe or unsound banking practices.

     CRA. The Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) requires that, in connection with examinations of financial institutions within their jurisdiction, the Federal Reserve or the FDIC evaluate the records of financial institutions in meeting the credit needs of their local communities, including low and moderate income neighborhoods, consistent with the safe and sound operation of those banks. These factors are also considered in evaluating mergers, acquisitions, and applications to open a branch or facility.

     Insider Credit Transactions. Banks are also subject to certain restrictions imposed by the Federal Reserve Act on extensions of credit to executive officers, directors, principal stockholders, or any related interests of such persons. Extensions of credit (i) must be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, and follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with persons not covered above and who are not employees; and (ii) must not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features. Banks are also subject to certain lending limits and restrictions on overdrafts to such persons. A violation of these restrictions may result in the assessment of substantial civil monetary penalties on the affected bank or any officer, director, employee, agent, or other person participating in the conduct of the affairs of that bank; the imposition of a cease and desist order; and other regulatory sanctions.

     FDICIA. Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (“FDICIA”), each federal banking agency has prescribed, by regulation, noncapital safety and soundness standards for institutions under its authority. These standards cover internal controls, information systems, and internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, compensation, fees and benefits, such other operational and managerial standards as the agency determines to be appropriate, and standards for asset quality, earnings and stock valuation. An institution which fails to meet these standards must develop a plan acceptable to the agency, specifying the steps that the institution will take to meet the standards. Failure to submit or implement such a plan may subject the institution to regulatory sanctions. Management believes that CRB meets all such standards and, therefore, does not believe that these regulatory standards materially affect Columbia’s business operations.

Interstate Banking and Branching

     The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (“Interstate Act”) permits nationwide interstate banking and branching under certain circumstances. This legislation generally authorizes

 


Table of Contents

interstate branching and relaxes federal law restrictions on interstate banking. Currently, financial holding companies may purchase banks in any state, and states may not prohibit such purchases. Additionally, banks are permitted to merge with banks in other states as long as the home state of neither merging bank has opted out. The Interstate Act requires regulators to consult with community organizations before permitting an interstate institution to close a branch in a low-income area.

     Under recent FDIC regulations, banks are prohibited from using their interstate branches primarily for deposit production. The FDIC has accordingly implemented a loan-to-deposit ratio screen to ensure compliance with this prohibition.

     Oregon and Washington each enacted “opting in” legislation in accordance with the Interstate Act provisions allowing banks to engage in interstate merger transactions subject to certain “aging” requirements. In both states, branches may not be acquired or opened separately in the home state by an out-of-state bank, but once an out-of-state bank has acquired a bank within the state, either through merger or acquisition of all or substantially all of the bank’s assets, the out-of-state bank may open additional branches within the home state.

Deposit Insurance

     The deposits of CRB are currently insured to a maximum of $100,000 per depositor through the Bank Insurance Fund (“BIF”) administered by the FDIC. CRB is required to pay semi-annual deposit insurance premium assessments to the FDIC.

     The FDICIA included provisions to reform the Federal Deposit Insurance System, including the implementation of risk-based deposit insurance premiums. The FDICIA also permits the FDIC to make special assessments on insured depository institutions in amounts determined by the FDIC to be necessary to give it adequate assessment income to repay amounts borrowed from the U.S. Treasury and other sources, or for any other purpose the FDIC deems necessary. The FDIC has implemented a risk-based insurance premium system under which banks are assessed insurance premiums based on how much risk they present to the BIF. Banks with higher levels of capital and a low degree of supervisory concern are assessed lower premiums than banks with lower levels of capital or a higher degree of supervisory concern.

Dividends

     The principal source of Columbia’s cash revenues is dividends received from its subsidiary. The payment of dividends is subject to government regulation, in that regulatory authorities may prohibit banks and financial holding companies from paying dividends which would constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice. In addition, a bank may not pay cash dividends if that payment could reduce the amount of its capital below that necessary to meet minimum applicable regulatory capital requirements. Also, under the Oregon Bank Act, the Oregon Director of Banks may suspend the payment of dividends if it is determined that the payment would cause a bank’s remaining stockholders’ equity to be inadequate for the safe and sound operation of the bank. Other than the laws and regulations noted above, which apply to all banks and financial holding companies, neither Columbia nor CRB is currently subject to any regulatory restrictions on their dividends.

Capital Adequacy

     Federal bank regulatory agencies use capital adequacy guidelines in the examination and regulation of financial holding companies and banks. If capital falls below minimum guideline levels, the holding company or bank may be denied approval to acquire or establish additional banks or nonbank businesses or to open new facilities.

     The FDIC and Federal Reserve use risk-based capital guidelines for banks and financial holding companies. These are designed to make such capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profiles among banks and financial holding companies, to account for off-balance sheet exposure, and to minimize disincentives for holding liquid assets. Assets and off-balance sheet items are assigned to broad risk categories, each with appropriate weights. The resulting capital ratios represent capital as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets and off-balance

 


Table of Contents

sheet items. The guidelines are minimums, and the Federal Reserve has noted that financial holding companies contemplating significant expansion programs should not allow expansion to diminish their capital ratios and should maintain ratios well in excess of the minimum. The current guidelines require all financial holding companies and federally regulated banks to maintain a minimum risk-based total capital ratio equal to 8%, of which at least 4% must be Tier I capital.

     Tier I capital for financial holding companies includes common stockholders’ equity, qualifying perpetual preferred stock (up to 25% of total Tier I capital, if cumulative, although under a Federal Reserve Rule, redeemable perpetual preferred stock may not be counted as Tier I capital unless the redemption is subject to the prior approval of the Federal Reserve), and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less intangibles. Tier II capital includes: (i) the allowance for loan losses of up to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets; (ii) any qualifying perpetual preferred stock which exceeds the amount which may be included in Tier I capital; (iii) hybrid capital instruments; (iv) perpetual debt; (v) mandatory convertible securities; and (vi) subordinated debt and intermediate term preferred stock of up to 50% of Tier I capital. Total capital is the sum of Tier I and Tier II capital, less reciprocal holdings of other banking organizations, capital instruments, and investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries.

     The assets of banks and financial holding companies receive risk-weights of 0%, 20%, 50%, and 100%. In addition, certain off-balance sheet items are given credit conversion factors to convert them to asset equivalent amounts to which an appropriate risk-weight will apply. These computations result in total risk-weighted assets.

     Most loans are assigned to the 100% risk category, except for first mortgage loans fully secured by residential property which carry a 50% rating. Most investment securities are assigned to the 20% category, except for municipal or state revenue bonds which have a 50% risk-weight, and direct obligations of, or obligations guaranteed by, the United States Treasury or agencies of the federal government which have 0% risk-weight. In converting off-balance sheet items, direct credit substitutes, including general guarantees and standby letters of credit backing financial obligations, are given a 100% conversion factor. Transaction related contingencies such as bid bonds, other standby letters of credit and undrawn commitments, including commercial credit lines with an initial maturity of more than one year, have a 50% conversion factor. Short-term, self-liquidating trade contingencies are converted at 20%, and short-term commitments have a 0% factor.

     The Federal Reserve also employs a leverage ratio, which is Tier I capital as a percentage of total assets less intangibles, to be used as a supplement to risk-based guidelines. The principal objective of the leverage ratio is to constrain the maximum degree to which a financial holding company may leverage its equity capital base. The Federal Reserve requires a minimum leverage ratio of 3%. However, for all but the most highly rated financial holding companies and for financial holding companies seeking to expand, the Federal Reserve expects an additional cushion of at least 1% to 2%.

     The FDICIA created a statutory framework of supervisory actions indexed to the capital level of the individual institution. Under regulations adopted by the FDIC, an institution is assigned to one of five capital categories depending on its total risk-based capital ratio, Tier I risk-based capital ratio, and leverage ratio, together with certain subjective factors. Institutions which are deemed to be “undercapitalized”, depending on the category to which they are assigned, are subject to certain mandatory supervisory corrective actions.

Effects of Government Monetary Policy

     The earnings and growth of Columbia are affected not only by general economic conditions but also by the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government, particularly the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve can and does implement national monetary policy for such purposes as curbing inflation and combating recession, but its open market operations in U.S. government securities, control of the discount rate applicable to borrowings from the Federal Reserve, and establishment of reserve requirements against certain deposits, influence the growth of bank loans, investments and deposits, and also affect interest rates charged on loans or paid on deposits. The nature and impact of future changes in monetary policies and their impact on Columbia cannot be predicted with certainty.

 


Table of Contents

Changes in Banking Laws and Regulations

     The laws and regulations that affect banks and financial holding companies frequently undergo significant changes at the federal and state levels. Bills are introduced from time to time in the United States Congress that contain proposals to alter the structure, regulation, and competitive relationships of the nation’s financial institutions. Any changes in laws and regulations could have the effect of increasing or decreasing the cost of doing business, limiting or expanding permissible activities (including activities in the insurance and securities fields), or affecting the competitive balance among banks, savings associations, and other financial institutions. Such changes could also reduce the extent of federal deposit insurance, broaden the powers or the geographical range of operations of financial holding companies, alter the extent to which banks could engage in securities activities, alter the taxation of banks, financial holding companies and other financial services organizations, and change the structure and jurisdiction of various financial institution regulatory agencies. Such ongoing changes in laws and regulations, and the extent to which the business of Columbia might be affected thereby, cannot be predicted with certainty.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

     Nine of Columbia’s facilities in Hood River, The Dalles, Redmond, Bend, McMinnville, Madras, Hermiston and Pendleton Oregon, as well as its two full-service branch facilities in south central Washington, are housed in properties owned, free of all encumbrances, by Columbia. Columbia leases the space for its Canby and Newberg branches, both McMinnville and Bend limited-service branches in retirement communities, the Newport Mortgage Group office as well as its facility in the Safeway store and the Administration building located in The Dalles. All of Columbia’s presently owned full-service branches have drive-up facilities and automated teller machines. Columbia’s Mortgage Group operates from the second floor of Columbia’s Bend branch; 1701 NE Third Street. The following sets forth certain information regarding Columbia’s branch facilities.

                 
            Date    
        Square   Opened or   Occupancy
City and County   Address   Feet   Acquired   Status

 
 
 
 
Oregon Branches                
The Dalles (Main Branch), Wasco County   316 East Third Street   8,000   1977   Owned
The Dalles (Westside Branch), Wasco County (1)   520 Mt. Hood Street   430   1986   Leased
Hood River Branch, Hood River County   2650 Cascade Avenue   6,255   1993   Owned
Madras Branch, Jefferson County   624 SW Fourth Street   7,400   1995   Owned
Redmond Branch, Deschutes County   434 North Fifth Street   4,700   1995   Owned
Bend Branch, Deschutes County   1701 NE Third Street   8,306   1996   Owned
Shevlin Center Branch,(2) Deschutes County   925 SW Emkay Drive   15,000   1999   Owned
Bend Limited Facility, Deschutes County   1010 NE Purcell Blvd   80   2002   Leased
Hermiston Branch, Umatilla County   1033 South Highway 395   4,700   1998   Owned
Pendleton Branch, Umatilla County   2101 SW Court Place   4,700   1999   Owned
McMinnville Branch,(2) Yamhill County   723 N Baker   9,600   1998   Owned

 


Table of Contents

                         
                Date    
        Square   Opened or   Occupancy
City and County   Address   Feet   Acquired   Status

 
 
 
 
McMinnville Limited Facility, Yamhill County   900 NW Hill Rd     60       1998     Leased
McMinnville Limited Facility, Yamhill County   300 NW Hillside Pkwy     60       2001     Leased
Canby Branch, Clackamas County   223 NE 2nd St     1,500       2001     Leased
Newberg Branch, Yamhill County   901 N Brutscher St., Ste A     3,900       1999     Leased
Washington Branches                        
White Salmon Branch, Klickitat County   390 NE Tohomish Street     5,500       1996     Owned
Goldendale Branch, Klickitat County   202 West Main Street     6,105       1996     Owned
Other Facilities                        
Newport, OR, Mortgage Facility, Lincoln County   2009 N Coast Hwy     1,700       2001     Leased
The Dalles, OR, Administration, Wasco County   401 E Third St, Suite 200     14,868       2002     Leased


(1)   Leased space in a Safeway supermarket. Lease term expires December 2005.
 
(2)   Branch operations are located on the first floor. A portion of the second floor is leased to other parties.

     In 1999, Columbia purchased 156,723 square feet of bare land in the Columbia River Center in The Dalles for future branch or administrative operations expansion. Columbia also purchased bare land in 1995, adjacent to the Hood River Branch, for the purpose of future parking expansion. After the completion of the parking expansion in 2001, Columbia partitioned the land and currently has 13,068 square feet for sale.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

     Management is not presently aware of any pending or threatened claims against Columbia that, if determined adversely to Columbia, would have a material affect on its operations or performance. In the normal course of its business, Columbia is a party to various debtor-creditor legal actions, none of which, individually or in the aggregate, are presently material to Columbia’s business, operations or financial condition. These include cases filed as a plaintiff in collection and foreclosure cases, and the enforcement of creditors’ rights in bankruptcy proceedings.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

     No matters were submitted to a vote of securities holders of Columbia during the quarter ended December 31, 2002.

 


Table of Contents

Part II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

     The common stock of Columbia Bancorp trades on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol “CBBO”. Trading in Columbia’s stock on NASDAQ commenced on November 6, 1998. The respective high and low sale prices of Columbia’s common stock for the periods indicated are shown below. All prices for the periods shown have been adjusted for subsequent stock splits. Prices do not include retail markups, markdowns, or commissions, and may not represent actual transactions. Columbia has paid dividends on its common stock on a quarterly basis. The table below also sets forth dividends declared per share of common stock for the periods indicated. As of February 18, 2003 Columbia had 7,890,102 shares issued and outstanding, which were held by approximately 2,324 stockholders.

                                                 
Table 1   2002   2001
   
 
    Stock Trading Range           Stock Trading Range        
 
  Cash Dividend  
  Cash Dividend
    High   Low   Declared   High   Low   Declared
   
 
 
 
 
 
First Quarter
  $ 11.40     $ 10.06     $ 0.08     $ 8.38     $ 6.00     $ 0.08  
Second Quarter
    13.15       10.96       0.08       9.00       7.15       0.08  
Third Quarter
    13.92       10.90       0.08       10.95       8.50       0.08  
Fourth Quarter
    15.05       11.75       0.08       10.50       8.84       0.08  

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

     The following table sets forth certain information concerning the consolidated financial condition, operating results, and key operating ratios for Columbia at the dates and for the periods indicated. This information does not purport to be complete, and should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and the Consolidated Financial Statements of Columbia and Notes thereto.

                                           
Table 2   As of and For the Years Ended December 31,
   
(dollars in thousands except dollars per share data)   2002   2001   2000   1999   1998

 
 
 
 
 
Income Statement Data
                                       
 
Interest income
  $ 37,616     $ 35,078     $ 33,367     $ 26,883     $ 21,328  
 
Interest expense
    7,782       11,583       12,256       8,568       7,205  
 
Net interest income
    29,834       23,495       21,111       18,315       14,123  
 
Loan loss provision
    1,800       1,450       1,697       1,005       1,000  
 
Net income
    9,381       7,374       5,624       5,013       4,718  
Balance Sheet Data
                                       
 
Investment securities
    36,048       43,532       60,544       62,333       47,894  
 
Loans, net
    432,687       380,283       299,881       246,975       206,552  
 
Total assets
    544,326       482,207       416,859       361,241       342,413  
 
Total deposits
    455,835       394,636       346,427       310,910       295,680  
 
Shareholders’ equity
    50,190       46,445       41,326       37,322       34,756  

 


Table of Contents

                                           
Table 2   As of and For the Years Ended December 31,
   
(dollars in thousands except dollars per share data)   2002   2001   2000   1999   1998

 
 
 
 
 
Per Share Data
                                       
Earnings Per Share
                                       
 
Basic earnings per common share
    1.16       0.92       0.70       0.63       0.67  
 
Diluted earnings per common share
    1.13       0.89       0.70       0.62       0.65  
Cash dividends declared per common share
    0.32       0.32       0.28       0.24       0.23  
Book value per common share
    6.38       5.78       5.15       4.66       4.37  
Capital Ratios
                                       
 
Tier I capital ratio (1)
    8.87 %     9.36 %     9.78 %     10.17 %     10.90 %
 
Total risk-based capital ratio (2)
    10.96 %     10.61 %     11.03 %     11.32 %     11.90 %
 
Leverage ratio (3)
    7.82 %     8.61 %     8.14 %     8.26 %     8.90 %
Financial Ratios
                                       
 
Return on average assets
    1.80 %     1.64 %     1.41 %     1.44 %     1.83 %
 
Return on average equity
    18.80 %     16.76 %     14.40 %     13.90 %     18.10 %

(1)   Tier I capital divided by risk-weighted assets.
 
(2)   Total capital divided by risk-weighted assets.
 
(3)   Tier I capital divided by average total assets.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Critical accounting policies and estimates

     The “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” as well as disclosures included elsewhere in this Form 10-K, are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates the estimates used, including the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses, impairment of intangible assets, and contingencies and litigation. Estimates are based upon historical experience, current economic conditions and other factors that management considers reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates result in judgments regarding the carrying values of assets and liabilities when these values are not readily available from other sources as well as assessing and identifying the accounting treatments of commitments and contingencies. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The following critical accounting policies involve the more significant judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

     The allowance for loan and lease losses is established to absorb known and inherent losses attributable to loans and leases outstanding and related off-balance-sheet commitments. The adequacy of the allowance is monitored on an ongoing basis and is based on management’s evaluation of numerous factors. These factors include the quality of the current loan portfolio, the trend in the loan portfolio’s risk ratings, current economic conditions, loan concentrations, loan growth rates, past-due and nonperforming trends, evaluation of specific loss estimates for all significant problem loans, historical charge-off and recovery experience and other pertinent information. Approximately 64.28% of Columbia’s loan portfolio is secured by real estate and a significant depreciation in real estate values in Oregon and Washington would cause management to increase the allowance for loan and lease losses.

     Retained mortgage servicing rights are measured by allocating the carrying value of the loans between the assets sold and the interest retained, based on the relative fair value at the date of the sale. The fair market values are determined using a discounted cash flow model. Mortgage servicing assets are amortized over the expected life of

 


Table of Contents

the loan and are evaluated periodically for impairment. The expected life of the loan can vary from management’s estimates due to prepayments by borrowers. Prepayments in excess of management’s estimates would negatively impact the recorded value of the mortgage servicing rights. The value of the mortgage servicing rights is also dependent upon the discount rate used in the model. Management reviews this rate on an ongoing basis based on current market rates. A significant increase in the discount rate would negatively impact the value of mortgage servicing rights.

     At December 31, 2002, Columbia had approximately $7.4 million in goodwill as a result of business combinations. Columbia adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142 on January 1, 2002. Ongoing analysis of the fair value of recorded goodwill for impairment will involve a substantial amount of judgment, as will establishing and monitoring estimated lives of other amortizable intangible assets.

     Columbia applies Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations in accounting for its stock option plans. Accordingly, compensation costs are recognized as the difference between the exercise price of each option and the market price of Columbia’s stock at the date of each grant. Had compensation cost for Columbia’s 2002, 2001, and 2000 grants for stock-based compensation plans been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123, its net income and earnings per common share for December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, would approximate the pro forma amounts below (in thousands, except per share data).

Table 3

                           
(dollars in thousands except per share data)   2002   2001   2000

 
 
 
Net income:
                       
 
As reported
  $ 9,381     $ 7,374     $ 5,624  
 
Pro forma
  $ 8,570     $ 6,823     $ 5,486  
Basic earnings per common share:
                       
 
As reported
  $ 1.16     $ 0.92     $ 0.70  
 
Pro forma
  $ 1.06     $ 0.85     $ 0.68  
Diluted earnings per common share:
                       
 
As reported
  $ 1.13     $ 0.89     $ 0.70  
 
Pro forma
  $ 1.03     $ 0.83     $ 0.68  

     The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions for December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000:

                         
Table 4   2002   2001   2000

 
 
 
Divdend yield
    2.14 %     3.00 %     4.84 %
Expected life (years)
    6.00       3.32       3.32  
Expected volatility
    45.25 %     29.77 %     35.78 %
Risk-free rate
    2.08 %     3.74 %     5.11 %

     The effects of applying SFAS No. 123 in the pro forma disclosure are not indicative of future amounts. Additionally, there can be no assurance that the Financial Accounting Standards Board will not adopt accounting

 


Table of Contents

principles mandating the application of SFAS No. 123 in the future.

     Columbia may become party to various legal proceedings. These matters have a high degree of uncertainty associated with them. There can be no assurance that the ultimate outcome will not differ materially from Columbia’s assessment of them. There can also be no assurance that all matters that may be brought against Columbia are known to them at any point in time.

Overview

     The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Columbia’s audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002 included elsewhere in this report.

     Columbia Bancorp (“Columbia”) is a financial holding company, which conducts operations principally through its wholly-owned subsidiary Columbia River Bank (“CRB”). CRB is a state chartered bank, which offers a broad range of services to its customers, primarily small and medium sized businesses, farmers, and individuals. CRB has a network of 17 branches, 14 full-service branch facilities and three limited-service branch facilities in Oregon serve the northern and eastern Oregon communities of The Dalles, Hood River, Pendleton and Hermiston, the central Oregon communities of Madras, Redmond, and Bend, and the communities of McMinnville, Canby and Newberg in the Willamette Valley. Columbia’s two south central Washington full-service branches serve the communities of Goldendale and White Salmon.

     On December 19, 2002, Columbia formed Columbia Bancorp Trust I (“Trust”), a wholly-owned Delaware statutory business trust, for purposes of issuing Trust Preferred Securities. The Trust issued $4.0 million of trust-preferred securities at a floating rate indexed to the 90 day LIBOR with a margin of 3.30%. These securities are considered to be Tier I for regulatory capital purposes.

     Columbia’s goal is to grow its earning assets while maintaining a high return on equity and high asset quality. The key to this, in Columbia’s view, is to emphasize personal, quality banking products and services for its customers, to hire and retain competent branch and administrative personnel, and to respond quickly to customer demand and growth opportunities. Columbia also intends to increase its penetration in its existing markets, and to expand into new markets through further suitable acquisitions and new branch openings.

     As of December 31, 2002, Columbia had total assets of $544.33 million, total deposits of $455.84 million and stockholders’ equity of $50.19 million. As of December 31, 2001 and 2000, total assets were $482.21 million and $416.86 million, total deposits were $394.64 million and $346.43 million, and stockholders’ equity were $46.45 million and $41.33 million, respectively. Columbia’s net income for years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, was $9.38 million, $7.37 million and $5.62 million, respectively. Columbia’s year 2002 net income represents the 15th consecutive year of increasing net income. For the year ended December 31, 2002, Columbia’s return on average assets was 1.80% and return on average equity was 18.80%.

     Return on average daily assets and equity and certain other ratios for the periods indicated are presented below:

 


Table of Contents

                                         
    Years Ended December 31,
Table 5  
(dollars in thousands)   2002   2001   2000   1999   1998

 
 
 
 
 
Net income
  $ 9,381     $ 7,374     $ 5,624     $ 5,013     $ 4,718  
Average assets
    521,537       450,262       398,422       347,003       257,664  
RETURN ON AVERAGE ASSETS
    1.80 %     1.64 %     1.41 %     1.44 %     1.83 %
Net income
  $ 9,381     $ 7,374     $ 5,624     $ 5,013     $ 4,718  
Average equity
    49,905       43,990       39,062       36,075       26,069  
RETURN ON AVERAGE EQUITY
    18.80 %     16.76 %     14.40 %     13.90 %     18.10 %
Cash dividends declared and paid
  $ 2,580     $ 2,570     $ 2,326     $ 1,999     $ 1,587  
Net income
    9,381       7,374       5,624       5,013       4,718  
PAYOUT RATIO
    27.50 %     34.85 %     41.36 %     39.88 %     33.64 %
Average equity
  $ 49,905     $ 43,990     $ 39,062       36,075     $ 26,069  
Average assets
    521,537       450,262       398,422       347,003       257,664  
AVERAGE EQUITY TO ASSET RATIO
    9.13 %     9.77 %     9.80 %     10.40 %     10.12 %

Results of Operations

Net Interest Income

     For financial institutions, the primary component of earnings is net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income, principally from loan and investment security portfolios, and interest expense, principally on customer deposits and bank borrowings from other sources, such as trust preferred securities. Changes in net interest income result from changes in volume, spread and margin. Volume refers to the dollar level of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Spread refers to the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin is the ratio of net interest income to total average interest-earning assets and is influenced by the relative level of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

     Average Balances and Average Rates Earned and Paid. The following table shows average balances and interest income or interest expense, with the resulting average yield or rates by category of earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities:

 


Table of Contents

                                                                                 
Table 6   Year Ended December 31, 2002   Year Ended December 31, 2001   Year Ended December 31, 2000

 
 
 
                    Interest   Average           Interest   Average           Interest   Average
            Average   Income or   Yields or   Average   Income or   Yields or   Average   Income or   Yields or
(dollars in thousands)   Balance   Expense   Rates   Balance   Expense   Rates   Balance   Expense   Rates

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-earning assets:
                                                                       
   
Loans (1)
  $ 419,608     $ 35,334       8.42 %   $ 348,239     $ 32,135       9.23 %   $ 288,058     $ 29,473       10.23 %
   
Investment securities
                                                                       
   
Taxable securities
    18,822       1,035       5.58       29,049       1,615       5.56       40,641       2,403       5.91  
     
Nontaxable securities (2)
    17,191       1,223       7.12       18,375       1,320       7.18       19,157       1,374       7.17  
   
 
   
     
             
     
             
     
         
       
Total investment securities (2)
    36,013       2,258       6.31       47,424       2,935       6.19       59,798       3,777       6.32  
   
Interest-earning balances due from banks
    10,781       340       3.02       7,560       417       5.52       7,221       474       6.58  
   
Federal funds sold
    6,465       99       1.53       1,101       40       3.64       1,729       110       6.35  
   
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
       
Total interest-earning assets (3)
    472,867       38,031       8.04       404,324       35,527       8.79       356,806       33,834       9.48  
 
Non-interest earning assets
    48,670                       45,938                       41,616                  
   
 
   
                     
                     
                 
       
Total assets
  $ 521,537                     $ 450,262                     $ 398,422                  
   
 
   
                     
                     
                 
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                                                                       
   
Interest-bearing checking and savings accounts
  $ 189,356     $ 1,732       0.92 %   $ 158,286     $ 3,318       2.10 %   $ 153,540     $ 5,056       3.29 %
   
Time deposit & IRAs
    128,731       4,696       3.54       118,758       6,386       5.38       99,657       5,727       5.75  
   
Borrowed Funds
    35,343       1,354       3.83       34,238       1,880       5.49       24,123       1,473       6.11  
   
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
       
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    353,430       7,782       2.19       311,282       11,584       3.72       277,320       12,256       4.42  
   
Noninterest-bearing deposits
    114,652                       91,731                       79,895                  
   
 
   
                     
                     
                 
       
Total deposits
    468,082                       403,013                       357,215                  
   
Other liabilities
    3,550                       3,259                       2,145                  
   
 
   
                     
                     
                 
       
Total liabilities
    471,632                       406,272                       359,360                  
   
Shareholders’ equity
    49,905                       43,990                       39,062                  
   
 
   
                     
                     
                 
       
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 521,537                     $ 450,262                     $ 398,422                  
   
 
   
                     
                     
                 
Net interest income (taxable equivalent basis)
          $ 30,249                     $ 23,943                       $ 21,578        
           
 
   
                     
                       
       
Net interest income (as reported)
          $ 29,834                     $ 23,495                       $ 21,111        
           
 
   
                     
                       
       
Average yield on average earning assets (1)
            8.04 %                     8.79 %                       9.48 %  
         
 
           
                     
                       
   
Interest expense to average earning assets
                  1.64 %                     2.87 %                       3.43 %  
   
 
           
                     
                       
 
Net interest spread
                  5.85 %                     5.07 %                       5.06 %  
   
 
                 
                     
                       
 
Net interest margin(3)
                  6.40 %                     5.92 %                       6.05 %  
   
 
                 
                     
                       
 


(1)   Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balance.
 
(2)   Tax-exempt income has been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis at 34%.
 
(3)   Net interest margin is computed by dividing net interest income (taxable equivalent basis) by total average earning assets.

     Analysis of Changes in Interest Differential. The following table shows the dollar amount of the increase (decrease) in Columbia’s net interest income and expense and attributes such dollar amounts to changes in volume as well as changes in rates. Rate and volume variances have been allocated proportionally between rate and volume changes:

                                                                                 
            2002 over 2001   2001 over 2000   2000 over 1999
           
 
 
            Increase (Decrease) due to   Increase (Decrease) due to   Increase (Decrease) due to
           
 
 
Table 7                   Net                   Net                   Net
(dollars in thousands)   Volume   Rate   Change   Volume   Rate   Change   Volume   Rate   Change

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-earning assets:
                                                                       
 
Loans
  $ 6,595     $ (3,396 )   $ 3,199     $ 6,153     $ (3,490 )   $ 2,663     $ 6,656     $ 322     $ 6,978  
 
Investment securities
                                                                       
   
Taxable securities
    (568 )     (12 )     (580 )     (686 )     (102 )     (788 )     146       62       208  
   
Nontaxable securities
    (56 )     (7 )     (63 )     (820 )     784       (36 )     (83 )     (13 )     (96 )
 
Balances due from banks
    178       (255 )     (77 )     734       (792 )     (58 )     96       17       113  
 
Federal funds sold
    195       (136 )     59       (40 )     (30 )     (70 )     (745 )     26       (719 )
 
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
       
Total
    6,344       (3,806 )     2,538       5,341       (3,630 )     1,711       6,070       414       6,484  
 
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                                                                       
 
Interest-bearing checking and savings accounts
    659       (2,244 )     (1,585 )     152       (1,890 )     (1,738 )     (2 )     910       908  
 
Time deposits
    540       (2,230 )     (1,690 )     1,102       (443 )     659       1,235       605       1,840  
 
Borrowed funds
    60       (586 )     (526 )     618       (212 )     406       834       106       940  
 
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
       
Total
    1,259       (5,060 )     (3,801 )     1,872       (2,545 )     (673 )     2,067       1,621       3,688  
 
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net increase (decrease) in net interest income
  $ 5,085     $ 1,254     $ 6,339     $ 3,469     $ (1,085 )   $ 2,384     $ 4,003     $ (1,207 )   $ 2,796  
 
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 

     Net interest income on a tax equivalent basis, before provision for loan losses, for the year ended December 31, 2002 was $30.25 million, an increase of 26.34% compared to net interest income of $23.94 million in 2001, an increase of 10.96% compared to net interest income of $21.58 million in 2000. The overall tax-equivalent earning asset yield was 8.04% in 2002 compared to 8.79% in 2001 and 9.48% in 2000. For the same years, rates on interest-bearing liabilities were 2.19%, 3.72% and 4.42%, respectively. The net interest spread for year 2002, increased 78 basis points over year 2001.

     Total interest-earning assets averaged $472.87 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, compared to $404.32 million and $356.81 million for the corresponding periods in 2001 and 2000. Most of the increase occurred in the loan category. Increases in the loan portfolio are attributed to favorable interest rates and the execution of Columbia’s strategy to provide personal, quality banking products and services, to hire experienced lending personnel in strategic branch locations and administrative capacities, and to emphasize its marketing strategies.

     Interest-bearing liabilities averaged $353.43 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to $311.28 million during the same period in 2001. Interest cost, as a percentage of earning assets, decreased to 1.64% in 2002, compared to 2.87% in 2001 and 3.43% in 2000.

 


Table of Contents

     Average loans, which generally carry a higher yield than investment securities and other earning assets, comprised 88.74% of average earning assets during 2002, compared to 86.13% in 2001 and 80.73% in 2000. During the same periods, average yields on loans were 8.42% in 2002, 9.23% in 2001, and 10.23% in 2000. Average investment securities comprised 7.62% of average earning assets in 2002, which was down from 11.73% in 2001 and 16.76% in 2000. Tax equivalent interest yields on investment securities were 6.31% for 2002, 6.19% in 2001 and 6.32% in 2000.

Provision for Loan Losses

     The provision for loan losses represents charges made to earnings to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses. The allowance is maintained at an amount management believes to be sufficient to absorb losses in the loan portfolio. Factors considered in establishing an appropriate allowance include a careful assessment of the financial condition of the borrower; a realistic determination of the value and adequacy of underlying collateral; the condition of the local economy and the condition of the specific industry of the borrower; a comprehensive analysis of the levels and trends of loan categories; and, a review of delinquent and classified loans. Columbia applies a systematic process for determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, including an internal loan review function and a quarterly analysis of the adequacy of the allowance. The quarterly analysis includes determination of specific potential loss factors on individual classified loans, historical potential loss factors derived from actual net charge-off experience and trends in nonperforming loans, and potential loss factors for other loan portfolio risks such as loan concentrations, the condition of the local economy, and the nature and volume of loans. For the year ended December 31, 2002 the allowance for loan losses totaled $6.42 million, compared to $5.31 million at December 31, 2001, and $4.58 million at December 31, 2000. This represents an increase of 20.80% between 2001 and 2002 and an increase of 16.03% between 2000 and 2001. A more detailed review of the loan loss provision and allowance for loan losses is presented in Table 13.

     The recorded values of loans actually removed from the consolidated balance sheets are referred to as charge-offs and, after netting out recoveries on previously charged-off loans, become net charge-offs. Columbia’s policy is to charge off loans when, in management’s opinion, the loan or a portion thereof is deemed uncollectible, although concerted efforts are made to maximize recovery after the charge-off. When a provision for loan loss is recorded, the amount is based on past charge-off experience, a careful analysis of the current portfolio, and an evaluation of economic trends in Columbia’s market areas. Management will continue to closely monitor the loan quality of new and existing relationships through stringent review and evaluation procedures and by making loan officers accountable for collection efforts.

     For the year ended December 31, 2002, loan charge-offs exceeded recoveries by $695,000 as compared to 2001 and 2000, when loan charge-offs exceeded recoveries by $716,000 and $417,000, respectively. A more detailed review of the net charge-offs is presented in Table 13.

Noninterest Income

     Total noninterest income increased 44.78% from year 2000 through year 2001, but declined 6.99% from year 2001 through 2002. During the prior three years, noninterest income changed from $6.35 million in 2000, to $9.19 million in 2001, and to $8.55 million in 2002. Noninterest income is primarily comprised of five categories-service charges and fees, mortgage group net revenues, credit card discounts and fees, financial services department income, and other noninterest income. Each of the categories increased during the prior three years, except for mortgage group revenues. Mortgage group revenues increased $2.17 million from 2000 to 2001, but decreased $2.07 million from 2001 to 2002. The decrease in mortgage group revenues during 2002 was due to higher amortization expense and valuation write-downs of CRB’s mortgage servicing asset. Management attributes this to accelerated prepayment rates in mortgage loans serviced due in large part to the low mortgage rate environment. Service charges and fees were $4.09 million for the year 2002, compared to $3.01 million for the year 2001, and $2.60 million for the year 2000. The growth in service charges and fees were attributable to growth in deposits and the implementation of an overdraft protection product known as “bounce”. The bounce product allows demand deposit customers to overdraw their accounts within a pre-established limit for a fee. The remainder of the increases

 


Table of Contents

in noninterest income is primarily attributable to improved revenues and growth received from credit card discounts and fees, financial services fee income, and other noninterest income fees and charges.

Noninterest Expense

     Noninterest expenses consist principally of salaries and benefits, occupancy costs, data processing expenses and other noninterest expenses. A measure of Columbia’s ability to control noninterest expenses is the efficiency ratio. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the efficiency ratio was 57.26%, as compared to 60.20% in 2001 and 62.17% in 2000. The efficiency ratio reflects an improving trend due to growth in revenue from the net interest margin and efforts by management to monitor and control overhead expenses.

     Noninterest expense for 2002 was $21.98 million, as compared to $19.49 million for 2001 and $16.84 million for 2000. The changes in noninterest expense are the result of increased personnel expenses due to higher incentive compensation and commissions paid to personnel, occupancy expense, and other noninterest expenses. The additional increases relate primarily to costs associated with growth in operations and continued investment in technology and communication systems.

Income Taxes

     The provision for income taxes was $5.22 million in 2002, $4.38 million in 2001 and $3.30 million in 2000. The provision resulted in effective combined federal and state tax rates of 35.77% in 2002, 37.25% in 2001, and 37.01% in 2000. The effective tax rates differ from combined estimated statutory rates of 38% principally due to the effects of nontaxable interest income, which is recognized for accounting purposes but not for tax purposes.

Summary Balance Sheets

                                                                 
         
December 31,
            Increase (Decrease)                
Table 8  
 
                       
(dollars in thousands)   2002   2001   2000   12/31/01 – 12/31/02   12/31/00 – 12/31/01

 
 
 
 
 
ASSETS
                                                       
 
Federal funds sold
  $ 3,735     $ 1,525     $ 1,141     $ 2,210       144.92 %   $ 384       33.65 %
 
Investments
    36,048       43,532       60,544       (7,484 )     (17.19 )     (17,012 )     (28.10 )
 
Loans
    432,687       380,283       299,881       52,404       13.78 %     80,402       26.81 %
 
Other assets (1)
    71,856       56,867       55,293       14,989       26.36 %     1,574       2.85 %
 
   
     
     
     
             
         
   
Total assets
  $ 544,326     $ 482,207     $ 416,859     $ 62,119       12.88 %   $ 65,348       15.68 %
 
   
     
     
     
             
         
LIABILITIES
                                                       
 
Noninterest-bearing deposits
  $ 129,042     $ 108,522     $ 87,824     $ 20,520       18.91 %   $ 20,698       23.57 %
 
Interest-bearing deposits
    326,793       286,113       258,603       40,680       14.22       27,510       10.64 %
 
   
     
     
     
             
         
   
Total deposits
    455,835       394,635       346,427       61,200       15.51       48,208       13.92 %
 
Other liabilites (2)
    38,301       41,127       29,106       (2,826 )     (6.87 )     12,021       41.30 %
 
   
     
     
     
             
         
   
Total liabilities
    494,136       435,762       375,533       58,374       13.40       60,229       16.04 %
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
    50,190       46,445       41,326       3,745       8.06       5,119       12.39 %
 
   
     
     
     
             
         
   
Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity
  $ 544,326     $ 482,207     $ 416,859     $ 62,119       12.88 %   $ 65,348       15.68 %
 
   
     
     
     
             
         

(1)   Includes cash and due from banks, property and equipment, and accrued interest receivable.
 
(2)   Includes accrued interest payable and other liabilities.

 


Table of Contents

Financial Condition
Investments

A year-to-year comparison shows that Columbia’s investment securities at December 31, 2002, totaled $36.05 million, compared to $43.53 million at December 31, 2001, and $60.54 million at December 31, 2000. This represents a decrease of 17.19% between 2001 and 2002 and a decrease of 28.10% between 2000 and 2001. The decrease in the investment portfolio is primarily a function of call provisions that were being exercised during the prior two years of falling interest rates. For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, no single investment security held by Columbia equaled or exceeded 10% of it consolidated shareholders’ equity. On December 31, 2002, investments in federal funds sold (an overnight investment) were $3.74 million and investments in restricted stock were $2.70 million. The balance of federal funds sold is influenced by cash demands, customer deposit levels, loan activity, and other investment transactions.

     Columbia follows a financial accounting principle which requires that investment securities be identified as held-to-maturity or available-for-sale. Held-to-maturity securities are those that Columbia has the intent and ability to hold until they mature or are called. Available-for-sale securities are those that management may sell if liquidity requirements dictate or if alternative investment opportunities arise. The mix of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment securities is determined by management, based on Columbia’s asset-liability policy, management’s assessment of the relative liquidity of Columbia, and other factors.

     At December 31, 2002, the investment portfolio, excluding restricted equity securities, consisted of 44.23% available-for-sale securities and 55.77% held-to-maturity securities. At December 31, 2001, the portfolio consisted of 45.36% available-for-sale securities and 54.64% held-to-maturity securities. At December 31, 2000, Columbia’s investment portfolio, excluding restricted equity securities, consisted of 66.87% available-for-sale securities and 33.13% held-to-maturity securities.

     At December 31, 2002, Columbia’s investment portfolio had total net unrealized gains of approximately $1.10 million. This compares to net unrealized gains of approximately $707,000 at December 31, 2001 and net unrealized gains of $5,000 at December 31, 2000. Unrealized gains and losses reflect changes in market conditions and do not represent the amount of actual profits or losses. Actual realized gains and losses occur at the time investment securities are sold or called.

     Federal funds sold are short-term investments that mature on a daily basis. Columbia invests in these instruments to provide for additional earnings on excess available cash balances. Because of their short maturities, the balance of federal funds sold fluctuates dramatically on a day-to-day basis. The balance on any one day is influenced by cash demands, customer deposit levels, loan activity and other investment transactions. Investments in federal funds sold totaled $3.74 million at December 31, 2002, compared to $1.53 million at December 31, 2001, and $1.14 million at December 31, 2000.

The following table provides the carrying value of Columbia’s portfolio of investment securities as of December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively.

                             
Table 9   December 31,   December 31,   December 31,
(dollars in thousands)   2002   2001   2000

 
 
 
Investments available-for-sale:
                       
 
U.S. Treasury securities
  $     $ 1,016     $ 1,015  
 
U.S. Government obligations
    11,644       14,208       34,532  
 
Corporate debt securities
    1,266       1,281       1,230  
 
Corporate equity securities
    113       300       300  
 
Municipal securities
    1,727       1,997       2,311  
 
 
   
     
     
 
 
    14,750       18,802       39,388  
 
 
   
     
     
 

 


Table of Contents

                             
    December 31,   December 31,   December 31,
Table 9   2002   2001   2000
(dollars in thousands)  
 
 
Investments held-to-maturity:
                       
 
U.S. Government obligations
    82              
 
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    14,748       15,742       16,328  
 
Mortgage-backed securities
    3,770       6,916       3,190  
 
 
   
     
     
 
 
    18,600       22,658       19,518  
 
 
   
     
     
 
Restricted equity securities
    2,698       2,072       1,638  
 
 
   
     
     
 
   
Total investment securities
  $ 36,048     $ 43,532     $ 60,544  
 
 
   
     
     
 

The maturities of investment securities, segmented by amortized cost, estimated fair value, and tax equivalent yields, were as follows as of the dates indicated:

                                                                             
Table 10   December 31, 2002   December 31, 2001   December 31, 2000

 
 
 
        Amortized   Estimated   %   Amortized   Estimated   %   Amortized   Estimated   %
(dollars in thousands)   Cost   Fair Value   Yield*   Cost   Fair Value   Yield*   Cost   Fair Value   Yield*

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasuries and agencies:
                                                                       
 
One year or less
  $     $           $ 1,004     $ 1,016       1.88 %   $     $        
 
One to five years
                                        1,018       1,015       5.41 %
U.S. Government agencies:
                                                                       
 
One year or less
    9,809       10,034       2.98 %     7,479       7,592       3.80 %     2,913       2,902       6.18 %
 
One to five years
    5,461       5,530       2.50 %     11,808       12,127       4.11 %     32,913       32,813       6.03 %
 
Five to ten years
                      1,428       1,433       5.87 %     2,004       2,002       6.20 %
Obligations of states and political subdivisions:
                                                                       
 
One year or less
    2,212       2,250       3.38 %     1,260       1,281       3.39 %     1,210       1,215       6.42 %
 
One to five years
    3,421       3,574       3.89 %     5,133       5,257       5.18 %     5,294       5,342       6.56 %
 
Five to ten years
    8,228       8,684       6.04 %     4,299       4,336       6.87 %     4,418       4,418       6.82 %
 
Over ten years
    2,613       2,738       6.40 %     6,993       7,022       7.23 %     7,695       7,772       7.16 %
Corporate and other debt securities:
                                                                       
 
One year or less
                                                     
 
One to five years
    1,229       1,266       2.57 %     1,234       1,281       4.25 %     1,239       1,230       6.74 %
 
 
   
     
             
     
             
     
         
   
Total debt securities
    32,973       34,076       4.06 %     40,638       41,345       4.99 %     58,704       58,709       6.31 %
Corporate equity securities
    113       113               300       300               300       300          
Restricted equity securities
    2,698       2,698               2,072       2,072               1,638       1,638            
 
 
   
     
             
     
             
     
           
   
Total securities
  $ 35,784     $ 36,887             $ 43,010     $ 43,717             $ 60,642     $ 60,647          
 
 
   
     
             
     
             
     
           

*     Weighted average yields are stated on a federal tax-equivalent basis at a 34% rate, and have been annualized, where appropriate.

Loans

     Columbia’s loan policies and procedures establish the basic guidelines governing its lending operations. Generally, the guidelines address the types of loans that it seeks, target markets, underwriting and collateral requirements, terms, interest rate and yield considerations, and compliance with laws and regulations. All loans or credit lines are subject to approval procedures and amount limitations. These limitations apply to the borrower’s total outstanding indebtedness to CRB, including the indebtedness of any guarantor. The policies are reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors of CRB.

     Bank officers are charged with loan origination in compliance with underwriting standards overseen by the loan administration department and in conformity with established loan policies. On an annual basis, the Board of Directors determines the lending authority of the President and the Chief Credit Officer, who then delegate lending authority to other lending officers. Such delegated authority may include authority related to loans, letters of credit, overdrafts, uncollected funds, and such other authority as determined by the Board, the President or Chief Credit Officer within their delegated authority.

     The Chief Credit Officer has the authority to approve loans up to a lending limit as set by the Board of Directors. All loans above the lending limit of the Chief Credit Officer, and up to a certain limit, are reviewed for approval by the President or Chief Operating Officer. Loans, which exceed this limit, are subject to review and approval by the Board’s Loan Committee. All loans approved by the Board Loan Committee are reviewed by the full Board at regularly scheduled meetings. Columbia’s unsecured legal lending limit was $7.68 million and real estate secured lending limit was $12.79 million at December 31, 2002. Columbia seldom makes loans for an amount approaching its legal lending limits.

     Net outstanding loans totaled $432.69 million at December 31, 2002, representing an increase of $52.40 million, or 13.78% compared to $380.28 million as of December 31, 2001. Loan commitments grew to $166.81 million as of December 31, 2002, representing an increase of $32.91 million over year-end 2001.

     Columbia’s net loan portfolio at December 31, 2002, includes loans secured by real estate 64.28%, commercial loans 16.48%, agricultural loans 14.57%, consumer loans 6.47%, deferred loan fees (0.29%) and reserve for loan loss (1.51%). The largest category is concentrated in real estate loans. This is primarily due to the significant growth of mortgage and commercial real estate loan activity. Residential mortgage loans usually are temporarily financed on the balance sheet before being sold to the secondary market. Some commercial loans are secured by real estate, but are used for purposes other than financing the purchase of real property, such as inventory financing and equipment purchases, where real property serves as collateral for the loan.

 


Table of Contents

     The following table presents the composition of Columbia’s loan portfolio, excluding mortgage loans held for sale, at the dates indicated:

                                                                                     
    December 31, 2002   December 31, 2001   December 31, 2000   December 31, 1999   December 31, 1998
   
 
 
 
 
(dollars in thousands)   Amount   Percentage   Amount   Percentage   Amount   Percentage   Amount   Percentage   Amount   Percentage
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
  $ 69,882       16.48 %   $ 64,163       17.76 %   $ 70,790       23.61 %   $ 60,869       23.61 %   $ 41,275       23.61 %
Agricultural
    61,770       14.57 %     54,934       15.20 %     44,299       14.77 %     37,775       14.77 %     34,604       14.77 %
Real estate secured loans:
                                                                               
 
Commercial property
    100,918       23.81 %     80,092       22.17 %     58,411       19.48 %     43,469       19.48 %     41,090       19.48 %
 
Farmland
    35,748       8.43 %     25,292       7.00 %     20,723       6.91 %     13,270       6.91 %     8,603       6.91 %
 
Construction
    91,036       21.47 %     70,474       19.50 %     41,374       13.80 %     33,780       13.80 %     20,048       13.80 %
 
Residential
    42,688       10.07 %     44,512       12.32 %     45,612       15.21 %     36,768       15.21 %     36,100       15.21 %
 
Home equity lines
    2,102       0.50 %     3,309       0.92 %     3,393       1.13 %     3,027       1.13 %     2,675       1.13 %
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
   
Total real estate
    272,492       64.28 %     223,679       61.91 %     169,513       56.53 %     130,314       56.53 %     108,516       56.53 %
Consumer
    20,937       4.94 %     19,802       5.48 %     19,195       6.40 %     18,086       6.40 %     16,569       6.40 %
Other
    6,499       1.53 %     5,251       1.45 %     1,690       0.56 %     827       0.56 %     933       0.56 %
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
   
Total loans
    431,580       101.81 %     367,829       101.80 %     305,487       101.87 %     247,871       101.87 %     201,897       101.87 %
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Less deferred loan fees
    (1,245 )     (0.29 )%     (1,194 )     (0.33 )%     (1,028 )     (0.34 )%     (891 )     (0.34 )%     (784 )     (0.34 )%
Less reserve for loan losses
    (6,417 )     (1.51 )%     (5,312 )     (1.47 )%     (4,578 )     (1.53 )%     (3,298 )     (1.53 )%     (2,380 )     (1.53 )%
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Loans receivable, net
  $ 423,918       100.00 %   $ 361,323       100.00 %   $ 299,881       100.00 %   $ 243,682       100.00 %   $ 198,733       100.00 %
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Volume change from prior year
            17.32 %             20.49 %             23.06 %             22.62 %             28.03 %
 
           
             
             
             
             
 

The following table sets forth Columbia’s loan portfolio maturities, excluding mortgage loans held for sale, on fixed rate loans and repricing dates on variable loans, for the periods indicated:

                                     
            December 31, 2002        
           
       
                One year                
        One year   through   After   Total
(dollars in thousands)   or less   five years   five years   loans
   
 
 
 
Commercial loans
  $ 36,454     $ 24,135     $ 9,293     $ 69,882  
Agricultural loans
    50,749       9,220       1,801       61,770  
Real estate secured loans:
                               
 
Commercial property
    14,277       50,671       35,970       100,918  
 
Farmland
    6,407       12,873       16,468       35,748  
 
Construction
    78,786       6,235       6,015       91,036  
 
Residential
    11,364       11,617       19,707       42,688  
 
Home equity lines
    947       264       891       2,102  
 
   
     
     
     
 
   
Total real estate loans
    111,781       81,660       79,051       272,492  
Consumer
    8,104       10,376       2,457       20,937  
Other
    5,169       74       1,256       6,499  
 
   
     
     
     
 
   
Total loans
  $ 212,257     $ 125,465     $ 93,858     $ 431,580  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Loans with fixed interest rates
                          $ 279,059  
Loans with floating interest rates
                            152,521  
 
                           
 
 
                          $ 431,580  
 
                           
 

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

     The reserve for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. Loans are charged against the reserve for loan losses when management believes that the collectibility of the principal or a portion thereof is unlikely. The reserve is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb possible losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible, based on evaluations of the collectibility of loans and prior loan loss experience. Accrual of interest is discontinued on a loan when management believes, after considering economic and business conditions, collection efforts and collateral position, that the borrower’s financial condition is such that collection of interest is doubtful.

     Columbia follows guidance from the Interagency Policy Statement issued by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) regarding Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses Methodologies. On a quarterly basis, management determines the appropriate allowance for loan and lease losses using the following three methodologies:

    Loss allocation to groups of loans by internal risk grade
 
    Loss allocation by loan type
 
    Loss allocation by historical loss percentage

Management’s determination of the adequacy of the reserve is based on an assessment of the risk in the portfolio given the conditions at the time. This assessment consists of certain loans and leases being evaluated on an individual basis, as well as all loans being categorized based on common credit risk attributes and as a group. The adequacy of the allowance is monitored on an ongoing basis and is based on management’s evaluation of numerous factors. These factors include the quality of the current loan portfolio, the trend in the loan portfolio’s risk ratings, current economic conditions, loan concentrations, loan growth rates, past-due and non-performing trends, evaluations of specific loss estimates for all significant problem loans, historical charge-off and recovery experience and other pertinent information.

     The following table shows Columbia’s loan loss experience for the periods indicated:

                                               
Table 13               Years Ended December 31,            
(dollars in thousands)   2002   2001   2000   1999   1998
   
 
 
 
 
Loans outstanding at end of period, net of unearned interest income (1)
  $ 439,104     $ 385,595     $ 304,459     $ 250,274     $ 208,932  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
Average loans outstanding for the period (1)
  $ 419,608     $ 348,239     $ 288,058     $ 222,276     $ 175,588  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
Reserve for loan losses balance, beginning of year
  $ 5,312     $ 4,578     $ 3,298     $ 2,380     $ 1,639  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
Loans charged off:
                                       
 
Commercial
    (319 )     (587 )     (139 )     (41 )     (219 )

 


Table of Contents

                                               
            Years Ended December 31,
Table 13   2002   2001   2000   1999   1998
(dollars in thousands)  
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate
    (197 )     (56 )     (14 )     (15 )     (51 )
 
Real estate construction
    (58 )                        
 
Agriculture
    (15 )     (79 )     (256 )     (26 )     (369 )
 
Consumer loans
    (206 )     (20 )     (8 )     (57 )     (77 )
 
Credit card and related accounts
    (91 )     (57 )     (42 )     (43 )     (51 )
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
     
Total loans charged-off
    (886 )     (799 )     (459 )     (182 )     (767 )
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
Recoveries:
                                       
 
Commercial
    97       71       6       32       40  
 
Real estate
          1                    
 
Real estate construction
    6                          
 
Agriculture
    11             30       48       49  
 
Consumer loans
    72       5       3       3       1  
 
Credit card and related accounts
    5       6       3       12       8  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
   
Total recoveries
    191       83       42       95       98  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
Net charge-offs
    (695 )     (716 )     (417 )     (87 )     (669 )
Provision charged to operations
    1,800       1,450       1,697       1,005       1,000  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
Acquisition of Valley Community Bancorp
                            410  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
Reserve for loan losses balance, end of period
  $ 6,417     $ 5,312     $ 4,578     $ 3,298     $ 2,380  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
Ratio of net loans charged-off to average loans outstanding
    0.17 %     0.21 %     0.14 %     0.04 %     0.38 %
Ratio of reserve for loan losses to loans at end of period
    1.46 %     1.38 %     1.50 %     1.32 %     1.13 %

(1)   Includes loans held-for-sale.

     The adequacy of the reserve for loan losses should be measured in the context of several key ratios: (1) the ratio of the reserve to total outstanding loans; (2) the ratio of total nonperforming loans to total loans; and, (3) the ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding. Since 1998, Columbia’s ratio of the reserve for loan losses to total loans has ranged from 1.13% to 1.50%. The amounts provided by these ratios have been sufficient to fund Columbia’s charge-offs, which have not been historically significant, and to provide for potential losses as the loan portfolio has grown. These ratios have also been consistent with the level of nonperforming loans to total loans. From December 31, 1998 through December 31, 2002, nonperforming loans to total loans have ranged from a low of 0.18% to a high of .91%. This experience tracks with changes in the ratio of the reserve for loan losses to total loans and with the actual balances maintained in the reserve account. Finally, Columbia’s historical ratio of net charge-offs to average outstanding loans illustrates its favorable loan charge-off and recovery experience. From December 31, 1998 through December 31, 2002, net charge-offs ranged from 0.04% to 0.38% of average loans. Management believes Columbia’s loan underwriting policies and its loan officers’ knowledge of their customers are significant contributors to Columbia’s success in limiting loan losses.

     During the year ended December 31, 2002, Columbia recognized $886,000 in loan losses and $191,000 in recoveries for a net charge-off of $695,000. These were consistent with Columbia’s historical experience in view of the growth in its loan portfolio.

 


Table of Contents

     The following table presents information with respect to nonperforming loans and other assets:

                                             
      December 31,
Table 14   2002   2001   2000   1999   1998
(dollars in thousands)  
 
 
 
 
Loans on nonaccrual status
  $ 742     $ 890     $ 1,163     $ 394     $ 1,082  
Loans past due - greater than 90 days
    5             7              
Restructured loans
    25       113       116       202       825  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
   
Total nonperforming loans
    772       1,003       1,286       596       1,907  
Other real estate owned
          349                   281  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
   
Total nonperforming assets
  $ 772     $ 1,352     $ 1,286     $ 596     $ 2,188  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
Allowance for loans losses
  $ 6,417     $ 5,312     $ 4,578     $ 3,298     $ 2,380  
Ratio of total nonperforming assets to total assets
    0.14 %     0.28 %     0.31 %     0.16 %     0.64 %
Ratio of total nonperforming loans to total loans
    0.18 %     0.26 %     0.43 %     0.24 %     0.91 %
Ratio of reserve for loan losses to total nonperforming assets
    830.73 %     392.82 %     355.95 %     553.45 %     108.82 %

     Columbia has adopted a policy for placement of loans on nonaccrual status after they become 90 days past due unless an exception is made to the policy. Further, Columbia may place loans that are not contractually past due or that are deemed fully collateralized on nonaccrual status to promote better oversight and review of loan arrangements. Loans on nonaccrual status at December 31, 2002 totaled approximately $742,000 compared to $890,000 at December 31, 2001 and $1.16 million at December 31, 2000.

     Columbia has adopted procedures to identify and monitor loans that have had their original terms restructured to accommodate borrowers’ financial needs. Loan revisions and modifications are provided to meet the credit needs of borrowers in weakened financial condition and to enhance ultimate collection. As of December 31, 2002, loans that had been classified as restructured were insignificant and were performing in accordance with their restructured terms. However, management will continue to monitor loans for any changes or deterioration in performance of restructured loans.

     At December 31, 2002, 2000, and 1999 Columbia had no assets in the other real estate owned (“OREO”) category. There was $349,000 in OREO at December 31, 2001 and $281,000 at December 31, 1998, which represents assets acquired through loan foreclosure or recovery activities.

 


Table of Contents

Deposits

     The following table sets forth composition of Columbia’s deposit balances for the dates indicated:

                                                   
      December 31, 2002   December 31, 2001   December 31, 2000
   
 
 
Table 15   Amount   Percentage   Amount   Percentage   Amount   Percentage
(dollars in thousands)  
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing demand deposits
  $ 182,341       40.00 %   $ 136,968       34.71 %   $ 133,467       38.53 %
Savings deposits
    32,940       7.23       32,237       8.17       27,252       7.87  
Time deposits < 100k
    66,766       14.66       79,451       20.13       70,481       20.36  
Time deposits > 100k
    44,746       9.82       37,458       9.49       27,403       7.91  
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Total interest-bearing deposits
    326,793       71.69       286,114       72.50       258,603       74.65  
 
Total noninterest-bearing deposits
    129,042       28.31       108,522       27.50       87,824       25.35  
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Total interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing deposits
  $ 455,835       100.00 %   $ 394,636       100.00 %   $ 346,427       100.00 %
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
 

     At December 31, 2002, total deposits were $455.84 million, an increase of $61.20 million or 15.51%, from total deposits of $394.64 million at December 31, 2001. The total deposits at December 31, 2001 of $394.64 million represent an increase of $48.21 million or $13.92%, from total deposits of $346.43 million at December 31, 2000. Deposit growth in 2002, 2001 and 2000 was due to a combination of pricing strategies, increased marketing and emphasis on the sales culture within the branches. The growth in deposit accounts in 2002 has primarily been in noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing demand accounts. To the extent Columbia can fund operations with noninterest-bearing demand deposits, net interest spread, which is the difference between interest income and interest expense, will improve. At December 31, 2002, core deposits, which consist of all demand deposit accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit less than $100,000, accounted for 90.16% of total deposits, down from 92.38% as of December 31, 2001.

     Interest-bearing deposits consist of money market, savings, and time certificate accounts. Interest-bearing account balances tend to grow or decline as Columbia adjusts its pricing and product strategies based on market conditions, including competing deposit products. At December 31, 2002, total interest-bearing deposit accounts were $326.79 million, an increase of $40.68 million, or 14.22%, from December 31, 2001. Increases in savings accounts and in interest-bearing deposits offset a decline in time deposits. Interest-bearing demand accounts increased $45.37 million, or 33.13%, from December 31, 2001 to 2002, after increasing $3.50 million, or 2.62%, from 2000 to 2001.

     Columbia does utilize brokered deposits as a source for funding future loan growth. In most cases, brokered deposit accounts are purchased with a long-term maturity of two to seven years. At December 31, 2002, time certificates of deposits in excess of $100,000 totaled $44.75 million, or 9.82% of total outstanding deposits, compared to $37.46 million, or 9.49%, of total outstanding deposits at December 31, 2001, and $27.40 million, or 7.91%, of total outstanding deposits at December 31, 2000. The following table sets forth, by time remaining to maturity, all time certificates of deposit accounts outstanding at December 31, 2002:

 


Table of Contents

                         
    CDs   CDs        
Table 16   < 100k   > 100k   Total
(dollars in thousands)  
 
 
Three months or less
  $ 17,100     $ 4,610     $ 21,710  
Over three through six months
    13,294       4,148       17,442  
Over six months through twelve months
    19,445       3,798       23,243  
Twelve months through five years
    16,510       31,412       47,922  
Over five years
    417       778       1,195  
 
   
     
     
 
 
  $ 66,766     $ 44,746     $ 111,512  
 
   
     
     
 

Long-Term and Short-Term Borrowings

     The following table sets forth certain information with respect to Columbia’s Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle borrowings.

                         
    December 31,
   
Table 17   2002   2001   2000
(dollars in thousands)  
 
 
Amount outstanding at end of period
  $ 26,285     $ 35,454     $ 25,520  
Weighted average interest rate at end of period
    4.16 %     4.00 %     6.39 %
Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end and during the year
  $ 50,622     $ 39,172     $ 29,053  
Average amount outstanding during the period
  $ 28,673     $ 32,626     $ 22,490  
Average weighted interest rate during the period
    4.05 %     5.26 %     6.34 %

     Short-tem borrowings from Treasury, Tax and Loan totaled $850,000, $451,000 and $850,000 at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

Trust Preferred Securities

     In December 2002, Columbia issued $4 million in unsecured subordinated debentures to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Columbia Bancorp Trust I. The interest payments on the subordinated debentures are intended to pass-through Columbia Bancorp Trust I to the beneficial owners of the Columbia Bancorp Trust I (“Trust Preferred Securities”). The subordinated debentures and trust preferred securities have identical rate, terms and conditions — variable rates tied to the 90 day LIBOR with a margin of 3.30% and 30 year maturities. The trust preferred securities are considered Tier I capital for regulatory purposes. Management structured this transaction in order to repurchase 328,422 shares of common stock at a price of $12.25 in November 2002 and maintain regulatory capital within the “well-capitalized” category as defined by the Bank’s regulators.

Shareholders’ Equity and Regulatory Capital

     Shareholders’ equity increased $3.75 million during 2002. Shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2002 was $50.19 million compared to $46.45 million at December 31, 2001. This increase reflects net income other and comprehensive income of $9.22 million and $1.01 million in exercised stock options. These additions to equity were partially offset by cash dividends paid or declared of $2.58 million.

 


Table of Contents

     The Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation have established minimum requirements for capital adequacy for financial holding companies and member banks. The requirements address both risk-based capital and leveraged capital. The regulatory agencies may establish higher minimum requirements if, for example, a corporation has previously received special attention or has a high susceptibility to interest rate risk. The following reflects Columbia’s various capital ratios at December 31, 2002, and December 31, 2001, as compared to regulatory minimums for capital adequacy purposes:

                         
Table 18   December 31, 2002   December 31, 2001   Regulatory Minimum
   
 
 
Tier I capital
    9.71 %     9.40 %     4.00 %
Total risk-based capital
    10.96 %     10.60 %     8.00 %
Leverage ratio
    8.57 %     8.60 %     4.00 %

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     Columbia has adopted policies to maintain a relatively liquid position to enable it to respond to changes in the financial environment and ensure sufficient funds are available to meet customers’ needs for borrowing and deposit withdrawals. Generally, Columbia’s major sources of liquidity are customer deposits, sales and maturities of investment securities, the use of borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle and correspondent banks, brokered certificates of deposit and net cash provided by operating activities. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, unused and available lines of credit totaled $44.68 million and $49.74 million, respectively.

     Scheduled loan repayments are a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and unscheduled loan prepayments are not as stable because they are influenced by general interest rate levels, competing interest rates available on other investments, market competition, economic conditions, and other factors. Liquid asset balances include cash, amounts due from other banks, federal funds sold, and securities available-for-sale and securities held-to-maturity with maturities occurring within three months. At December 31, 2002, these liquid assets totaled $45.08 million or 68.25% of total assets as compared to $41.47 million or 8.61% of total assets at December 31, 2001. The total liquid assets of $41.47 million or 8.61% of total assets as of December 31, 2001 compare to $66.04 million or 15.87% of total assets at December 31, 2000. Liquidity was stable during the year 2002 as a result of steady deposit growth. Columbia has met liquidity needs primarily from cash balances in correspondent accounts, income from operations, borrowing from the Federal Home Loan Bank and the growth of deposits.

     The analysis of liquidity also includes a review of the changes that appear in the consolidated statements of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2002. The statement of cash flows includes operating, investing, and financing categories. Operating activities include net income of $9.38 million, which is adjusted for non-cash items and increases or decreases in cash due to changes in certain assets and liabilities. Investing activities consist primarily of both proceeds from and purchases of securities and the impact of the net growth in loans. Financing activities present the cash flows associated with deposit accounts and reflect various transactions with stockholders.

     At December 31, 2002, Columbia had outstanding unfunded lending commitments of $166.81 million. Nearly all of these commitments represented unused portions of credit lines available to consumers under credit card and other arrangements and to businesses. Many of these credit lines will not be fully drawn upon and, accordingly, the aggregate commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Management believes that Columbia’s sources of liquidity are sufficient to meet likely calls on outstanding commitments, although there can be no assurance in this regard.

 


Table of Contents

Business Segment Information

                           
Table 19   Community   Mortgage        
(dollars in thousands)   Banking   Banking   Consolidated

 
 
 
December 31, 2002
                       
Net interest income before provision for loan losses
  $ 29,417     $ 417     $ 29,834  
Noninterest income
    2,780       5,771       8,551  
Amortization of the mortgage servicing asset
          1,029       1,029  
Impairment of mortgage servicing rights
          2,781       2,781  
Salaries and benefits
    10,310       2,750       13,060  
Occupancy expense, excluding depreciation
    668       151       819  
Depreciation
    1,141       98       1,239  
Operating expenses & other
    4,195       657       4,852  
Income before provision for income taxes
    15,883       (1,278 )     14,605  
Total assets
  $ 526,202     $ 18,124     $ 544,326  
December 31, 2001
                       
Net interest income before provision for loan losses
  $ 22,639     $ 856     $ 23,495  
Noninterest income
    3,558       5,636       9,194  
Amortization of the mortgage servicing asset
          395       395  
Impairment of mortgage servicing rights
          917       917  
Salaries and benefits
    8,689       2,733       11,422  
Occupancy expense, excluding depreciation
    576       115       691  
Depreciation
    1,065       74       1,139  
Goodwill amortization
    629             629  
Operating and Other Expenses
    5,918       455       6,373  
Income before provision for income taxes
    9,949       1,802       11,751  
Total assets
  $ 452,260     $ 29,947     $ 482,207  
December 31, 2000
                       
Net interest income before provision for loan losses
  $ 20,674     $ 437     $ 21,111  
Noninterest income
    4,086       2,265       6,351  
Amortization of the mortgage servicing asset
          160       160  
Salaries and benefits
    8,373       1,279       9,652  
Occupancy expense, excluding depreciation
    554       75       629  
Depreciation
    920       60       980  
Goodwill amortization
    629             629  
Operating expenses & other
    6,844       268       7,112  
Income before provision for income taxes
    8,069       860       8,929  
Total assets
  $ 401,090     $ 15,769     $ 416,859  

     The Mortgage Group has decreased total assets over the last year to $18.12 million at year-ending 2002. Assets were $29.95 million and $15.77 million for years ending 2001 and 2000, respectively. Assets of the Mortgage Group are primarily comprised of real estate loans in the portfolio, real estate loans held for sale, mortgage servicing

 


Table of Contents

asset, accrued interest receivable, and furniture and equipment.

     The mortgage servicing asset as of December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, was valued at $4.61 million, $6.20 million and $2.76 million, respectively. CRB uses a servicing portfolio valuation model to comply with Statement of Accounting Standard (SFAS) 140 Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. The servicing portfolio valuation model evaluates the value of the mortgage servicing asset by calculating the results from data input into the system including assumptions regarding; discount rates, inflation rates, effective tax rates, annual servicing costs, servicing premiums, stratified loans by term, weighted average terms to maturity, weighted average coupon, numbers of loans serviced and constant prepayment rate. The mortgage servicing asset is amortized in proportion to and over the period of the estimated life of the servicing income.

     In 2002 The Mortgage Group recorded a loss before income taxes of $1.28 million. Income for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 was $1.80 million, and $860,000 respectively. The mortgage banking group’s earnings in 2002 were negatively impacted by higher mortgage servicing asset amortization and valuation write-downs. This was caused by the low mortgage interest rate environment, which prompted a record number of borrowers to refinance their mortgage loans. In addition, the mortgage banking group’s net interest income was lower in 2002 due to improvements made in the department’s ability to increase the turnaround time from loan funding to investor settlement, thereby reducing the interest income and related interest expense. Furthermore, operating expenses were higher in 2002 as a result of higher consulting, sundry losses and general operating expenses. Noninterest income in 2002 was higher than the prior two years as a result of higher loan fees, improvements in the use of derivatives in secondary marketing and loan servicing revenue.

Inflation

     Management does not consider the effects of inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index, on Columbia’s financial position and earnings to be material.

Off-Balance Sheet

     In the normal course of business, Columbia utilizes financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of its customers, including loan commitments to extend credit, commercial letters of credit, standby letters of credit, unused portions of VISA credit cards, and commitments to fund mortgage loans.

     The increase in off-balance sheet items has occurred during the last three years as a result of growth in the loan portfolio. The table below sets forth the distribution of Columbia’s contingent liabilities by off-balance sheet type. Commitments to extend credit increased primarily due to growth and expansion of commercial real estate construction lending from our Deschutes County trade area.

Table 20

                                 
    December 31
           
(dollars in thousands)           2002   2001   2000

         
 
 
Commitments to extend credit
          $ 148,938       119,551     $ 90,862  
Undisbursed credit card lines of credit
            15,220       12,489       10,635  
Commercial and standby letters of credit
            2,654       1,866       912  
 
           
     
     
 
Total
          $ 166,812     $ 133,906     $ 102,409  
 
           
     
     
 

 


Table of Contents

Derivative Management

     The Mortgage Group accepts loan applications that typically do not fund and close for 30 to 60 days. During this time, the loan is considered to be in the “open mortgage pipeline”. Once the loan is either funded or closed, it is then removed from the open mortgage pipeline. The loans that comprise the open mortgage pipeline have been price-locked to the borrower; therefore, interest rate fluctuations may result in gains and/or losses from the sale of loans to the secondary market. The risk of price fluctuations to the open mortgage pipeline is managed by the use of derivatives-forward contracts and put options. The underlying securities of the derivatives are mortgage-backed securities, which generally correspond with the composition of the open mortgage pipeline. The structure of the derivatives is intended to serve as a hedge against the impact of rising and falling interest rates. The gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk is recognized in earnings in the same period, as required by Statement of Financial Standards (SFAS) 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”. As of December 31, 2002, there were $33.59 million in interest rate-locked mortgage loans contained in the open mortgage pipeline and the notional amount of the derivatives totaled $27.00 million in forward contract and put option hedges. The difference in amount between the loans in the open mortgage pipeline and the notional amount of the derivatives is due to the risk management practices for anticipating loan fall-out. Loan fall-out occurs when a locked-loan in the open mortgage pipeline is not closed and funded by Mortgage Group. The two most common causes for fall-out occur when borrowers either do not fulfill a real estate purchase contract or close their loan with a competing provider of mortgage loans. The risk of fall-out does expose CRB to changes in value of the derivatives that would apply to non-existent loans in the open mortgage pipeline. This risk is usually greater during periods of falling interest rates when borrowers take advantage of market conditions to shop for the lowest mortgage rates among competing mortgage loan providers. Columbia monitors this risk and adjusts its derivative coverage over the open mortgage pipeline in order to minimize risk of losses from fall-out. However, there can be no assurance that fluctuations in interest rates and changes in loan fall-out will not have a material adverse impact on earnings.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

     In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure—an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123.” This statement amends FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this statement amends the disclosure requirements of statement No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. Columbia’s management intends to continue using the intrinsic value method for stock-based employee compensation arrangements and, therefore, does not expect that the application provisions of this statement will have a material impact on Columbia’s consolidated financial statements.

     In October 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 147, “Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions.” This statement provides guidance on the accounting for the acquisition of a financial institution and applies to all acquisitions except those between two or more mutual enterprises. Columbia’s management does not expect that the application provisions of this statement will have a material impact on Columbia’s consolidated financial statements.

     In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (Including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring).” The statement is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002, with early application encouraged. Columbia’s management does not expect that the application of the provisions of this statement will have a material impact on Columbia’s consolidated financial statements.

     In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections.” This statement rescinds FASB Statement No. 4, “Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt,” and an amendment of that statement, FASB Statement No. 64, “Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements.” This statement also rescinds FASB Statement No. 44, “Accounting for Intangible Assets of Motor Carriers.” This statement amends

 


Table of Contents

FASB Statement No. 13, “Accounting for Leases,” to eliminate an inconsistency between the required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. This statement also amends other existing authoritative pronouncements to make various technical corrections, clarify meanings, or describe their applicability under conflicting conditions. Columbia’s management does not expect that the application of the provisions of this statement will have a material impact on Columbia’s consolidated financial statements.

     In January 2003, FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” This interpretation clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” and requires existing unconsolidated variable interest entities to be consolidated by their primary beneficiaries if the entities do not effectively disperse risks among parties involved. This interpretation explains how to identify variable interest entities and how an enterprise assesses its interests in a variable interest entity to decide whether to consolidate that entity. This interpretation applies immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003, and to variable interest entities in which an enterprise obtains an interest after that date. It applies in the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003, to entities in which an enterprise holds a variable interest that is acquired before February 1, 2003. The interpretation applies to public enterprises as of the beginning of the applicable interim or annual period. Columbia’s management does not expect that the application of the provisions of this interpretation will have a material impact on Columbia’s consolidated financial statements.

     In November 2002, FASB issued Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45), “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.” This interpretation elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing a guarantee. The disclosure requirements of FIN 45 are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 31, 2002, and the initial recognition and initial measurement provisions shall be applied on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. Columbia’s management does not expect that the application of the provisions of this interpretation will have a material impact on Columbia’s consolidated financial statements.

Factors That May Affect Future Results of Operations

     In addition to the other information contained in this report, the following risks may affect Columbia. If any of these risks occur, our business, financial condition or operating results could be adversely affected.

     Growth and Management. Our financial performance and profitability will depend on our ability to manage recent and possible future growth. Although management believes that it has substantially integrated the business and operations of recent acquisitions, there can be no assurance that unforeseen issues relating to the acquisitions will not adversely affect us. In addition, any future acquisitions and continued growth may present operating and other problems that could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will be able to execute our growth strategy or maintain the level of profitability that we have recently experienced.

     Changes in Market Interest Rates. Our earnings are impacted by changing interest rates. Changes in interest rates affect the demand for new loans, the credit profile of existing loans, the rates received on loans and securities, and rates paid on deposits and borrowings. The relationship between the rates received on loans and securities and the rates paid on deposits and borrowings is known as interest rate spread. Given our current volume and mix of interest-bearing liabilities and interest-earning assets, our interest rate spread could be expected to increase during times of rising interest rates and, conversely, to decline during times of falling interest rates. Exposure to interest rate risk is managed by monitoring the re-pricing frequency of CRB’s rate-sensitive assets and rate-sensitive liabilities over any given period. Although we believe our current level of interest rate sensitivity is reasonable, significant fluctuations in interest rates may have an adverse affect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

     Geographic Factors. Economic conditions in the communities we serve could adversely affect our operations. As a result of Columbia’s community bank focus, our results depend largely upon economic and

 


Table of Contents

business conditions in our service areas. A deterioration in economic and business conditions in our market areas, particularly in the agricultural and real estate industries on which some of these areas depend, could have a material adverse impact on the quality of our loan portfolio and the demand for our products and services, which in turn may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Further, a downturn in the national economy might further exacerbate local economic conditions. The extent of the future impact of these events on economic and business conditions cannot be predicted.

     Regulation. We are subject to government regulation that could limit or restrict our activities, which in turn could adversely impact our operations. The financial services industry is regulated extensively. Federal and state regulation is designed primarily to protect the deposit insurance funds and consumers, and not to benefit our stockholders. These regulations can sometimes impose significant limitations on our operations. In addition, these regulations are constantly evolving and may change significantly over time. Significant new laws or changes in existing laws or repeal of existing laws may cause our results to differ materially. Further, federal monetary policy, particularly as implemented through the Federal Reserve System, significantly affects credit conditions for us.

     Competition. Competition may adversely affect our performance. The financial services business in our market areas is highly competitive. It is becoming increasingly competitive due to changes in regulation, technological advances, and the accelerating pace of consolidation among financial services providers. We face competition both in attracting deposits and in making loans. We compete for loans principally through the interest rates and loan fees we charge and the efficiency and quality of services we provide. Increasing levels of competition in the banking and financial services industries may reduce our market share or cause the prices we charge for our services to fall. Our results may differ in future periods depending upon the nature or level of competition.

     Credit Risk. A source of risk arises from the possibility that losses will be sustained if a significant number of our borrowers, guarantors and related parties fail to perform in accordance with the terms of their loans. We have adopted underwriting and credit monitoring procedures and credit policies, including the establishment and review of the allowance for credit losses, that management believes are appropriate to minimize this risk by assessing the likelihood of nonperformance, tracking loan performance and diversifying our credit portfolio. These policies and procedures, however, may not prevent unexpected losses that could materially affect our results of operations.

ITEM 7A QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rate Risk Management

     In the banking industry, a major risk involves changing interest rates, which can have a significant impact on Columbia’s profitability. Columbia manages its exposure to changes in interest rates through asset and liability management activities within the guidelines established by its Asset Liability Committee (“ALCO”). ALCO has the responsibility for approving and ensuring compliance with asset-liability management policies, including interest rate risk exposure, capital position, liquidity management and the investment portfolio. Reports prepared by ALCO are provided to the Board of Directors on a regular basis.

     Asset-liability management simulation models are used to measure interest rate risk. The models quantify interest rate risk through simulating forecasted net interest income and economic value of equity over a 12-month time horizon under various rate scenarios. The economic value of equity is defined as the difference between the market value of current assets less the market value liabilities. By measuring the change in the present value of equity under different rate scenarios, management is able to identify interest rate risk that may not be evident in simulating changes in the forecasted net interest income.

     Table 21 below shows the simulated percentage change in forecasted net interest income and the economic value of equity using a stable rate environment. The change in interest rates assumes an immediate, parallel and sustained shift in the base interest rate forecast. Through these simulations, management estimates the impact on net interest income and present value of equity based on a 100 and 200 basis point upward or downward gradual change of market interest rates over a one-year period. The analysis did not allow rates to fall below zero.

 


Table of Contents

                 
Table 21     Percent Change     Percent Change
      in Net Interest     in Present Value
   Change in Interest Rates     Income     of Equity

   
   
-200 Basis points
    -4.76 %     -2.49 %
-100 Basis points
    -2.22 %     -2.89 %
+100 Basis points
    2.67 %     3.66 %
+200 Basis points
    6.96 %     5.71 %

     As illustrated in the above table, our balance sheet is currently asset sensitive, meaning that interest -earning assets mature or reprice more quickly than interest-bearing liability in a given period. Therefore, according to the model, net interest income should increase slightly when rates increase and shrink somewhat when rates fall. This is primarily a result of the concentration of variable rate and short-term commercial loans in Columbia’s portfolio.

     The simulation model does not take into account future management actions that could be undertaken, should a change occur in actual market interest rates. Also, certain assumptions underlie modeling simulation results and these assumptions may have significant impact on the results. These include assumptions regarding the level of interest rates and balance changes of deposit products that do not have stated maturities. These assumptions have been developed through a combination of industry standards and expected pricing behavior in the future. The model also includes assumptions about changes in the composition or mix of the balance sheet. The results derived from the simulation model could vary significantly due to external factors such as changes in prepayment assumptions, early withdrawals of deposits and unforeseen competitive factors.

Mortgage Servicing Asset

     The CRB Mortgage Group has recorded a mortgage-servicing asset (MSA) that contains risk due to loan prepayments. The value of the MSA will likely decline when interest rates fall due to an increase in loan prepayments. The MSA is measured on a quarterly basis with the use of a model that incorporates published data for prepayment speeds, servicing costs, ancillary income and discount rates. Any decrease in value of the MSA is recorded as valuation impairment. However, actual fair values may differ significantly from the measured valuation due to CRB’s analysis of available third-party market quotations.

     The value of the mortgage servicing asset is interest rate sensitive and is likely to require quarterly valuation adjustments during 2003 if mortgage interest rates decline further from all time low levels. However, if mortgage rates were to increase in 2003, management would expect that mortgage service asset valuations to decrease. In this instance, the monthly mortgage servicing asset amortization expense would be sufficient to amortize the MSA over the expected remaining life of the serviced mortgage loan portfolio.

ITEM 8 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)

The following tables set forth Columbia’s unaudited consolidated financial data regarding operations for each quarter of 2002 and 2001. This information, in the opinion of management, includes all normal and recurring adjustments, to fairly state the information contained in the tables. Certain amounts previously reported have been classified to conform with current presentation. These reclassifications had no net impact on the results of operations.

 


Table of Contents

                                               
Table 22   2002 Quarterly Financial Data
   
(In thousands except per share data)   First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
  Total
         
 
 
 
 
Income Statement Data
                                       
 
Interest income
  $ 8,587     $ 9,439     $ 9,841     $ 9,749     $ 37,616  
 
Interest expense
    1,790       2,029       2,090       1,873       7,782  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
     
Net interest income
    6,797       7,410       7,751       7,876       29,834  
 
Loan loss provision
    400       700       600       100       1,800  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
    6,397       6,710       7,151       7,776       28,034  
 
Noninterest income
    2,094       2,760       2,236       1,461       8,551  
 
Noninterest expense
    5,091       5,695       5,525       5,669       21,980  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
 
Income before provision for income taxes
    3,400       3,775       3,862       3,568       14,605  
 
Provision for income taxes
    1,219       1,353       1,338       1,314       5,224  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
     
Net income
  $ 2,181     $ 2,422     $ 2,524     $ 2,254     $ 9,381  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
Earnings Per Share
                                       
 
Basic earnings per common share
  $ 0.27     $ 0.30     $ 0.31     $ 0.28     $ 1.16  
 
Diluted earnings per common share
  $ 0.26     $ 0.29     $ 0.30     $ 0.27     $ 1.13  
                                               
          2001 Quarterly Financial Data
         
          First   Second   Third   Fourth        
          Quarter   Quarter   Quarter   Quarter   Total
         
 
 
 
 
Income Statement Data
                                       
 
Interest income
  $ 8,539     $ 8,711     $ 8,946     $ 8,882     $ 35,078  
 
Interest expense
    3,262       3,063       2,995       2,263       11,583  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
     
Net interest income
    5,277       5,648       5,951       6,619       23,495  
 
Loan loss provision
    250       375       250       575       1,450  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
    5,027       5,273       5,701       6,044       22,045  
 
Noninterest income
    1,863       2,796       1,910       2,625       9,194  
 
Noninterest expense
    4,479       4,754       4,953       5,302       19,488  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
 
Income before provision for income taxes
    2,411       3,315       2,658       3,367       11,751  
 
Provision for income taxes
    898       1,262       939       1,278       4,377  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
     
Net income
  $ 1,513     $ 2,053     $ 1,719     $ 2,089     $ 7,374  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
Earnings Per Share
                                       
 
Basic earnings per common share
  $ 0.19     $ 0.25     $ 0.21     $ 0.26     $ 0.92  
 
Diluted earnings per common share
  $ 0.19     $ 0.25     $ 0.21     $ 0.25     $ 0.89  

     Additional information called for by this item is contained in Columbia Bancorp’s Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2002, and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM  9 CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

     There were no changes in or disagreements with accountants regarding accounting and financial disclosure matters during the year ended December 31, 2001.

 


Table of Contents

PART III

ITEM 10 DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

     The information called for by this item is contained in Columbia’s definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 24, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 11 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND REPORT OF COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

     The information called for by this item is contained in Columbia’s definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 24, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12 SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

     The information called for by this item is contained in Columbia’s definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 24, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 13 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

     The information called for by this item is contained in Columbia’s definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 24, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14 CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

     Within 90 days prior to the date of this report, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Our principal executive and financial officers supervised and participated in this evaluation. Based upon this evaluation our principal executive and financial officers each concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in our periodic SEC reports. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon various assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any of our plans, products or procedures will succeed in achieving their intended goals under future conditions. In addition, there have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect our internal controls subsequent to our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses.

Part IV

ITEM 15 EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) Exhibits.

     The following documents are filed as part of this report and are incorporated herein by reference from the Registrant’s 2002 Annual Report:

 


Table of Contents

COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES


INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
AND
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001, AND 2000

 


Table of Contents

CONTENTS

         
      PAGE  
     
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
    1  
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
       
Balance sheets 2 – 3
       
Statements of income and comprehensive income
    4 – 5  
Statements of changes in stockholders’ equity
    6  
Statements of cash flows 7 – 8
       
Notes to financial statements
    9 – 46  

   
Note: These financial statements have not been reviewed, or confirmed for accuracy or relevance by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

 


Table of Contents

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Columbia Bancorp and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Columbia Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of Columbia Bancorp’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Columbia Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Portland, Oregon
January 17, 2003

1


Table of Contents

COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

ASSETS

                     
        December 31,
       
        2002   2001
       
 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
               
 
Cash and due from banks
  $ 28,414,139     $ 19,813,111  
 
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks
    8,551,980       1,275,462  
 
Federal funds sold
    3,735,416       1,525,165  
 
   
     
 
   
Total cash and cash equivalents
    40,701,535       22,613,738  
 
   
     
 
INVESTMENT SECURITIES
               
 
Investment securities available-for-sale
    14,749,694       18,802,107  
 
Investment securities held-to-maturity
    18,600,335       22,657,264  
 
Restricted equity securities
    2,698,200       2,072,300  
 
   
     
 
   
Total investment securities
    36,048,229       43,531,671  
 
   
     
 
LOANS
               
 
Loans held-for-sale
    8,769,777       18,959,979  
 
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses and unearned loan fees
    423,917,555       361,323,121  
 
   
     
 
   
Total loans
    432,687,332       380,283,100  
 
   
     
 
OTHER ASSETS
               
 
Property and equipment, net of accumulated Depreciation
    14,183,851       13,887,846  
 
Accrued interest receivable
    3,895,237       3,485,533  
 
Goodwill
    7,389,094       7,389,094  
 
Mortgage servicing asset, net of accumulated amortization and valuation allowance
    4,614,391       6,196,801  
 
Other assets
    4,806,315       4,818,922  
 
   
     
 
   
Total other assets
    34,888,888       35,778,196  
 
   
     
 
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 544,325,984     $ 482,206,705  
 
   
     
 

The accompanying Notes are an integral
part of these consolidated financial statements.

-2-


Table of Contents

COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

                     
        December 31,
       
        2002   2001
       
 
DEPOSITS
               
 
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
  $ 129,042,083     $ 108,521,784  
 
Interest-bearing demand deposits
    182,340,665       136,967,524  
 
Savings accounts
    32,939,990       32,237,233  
 
Time certificates
    111,512,375       116,908,960  
 
   
     
 
   
Total deposits
    455,835,113       394,635,501  
 
   
     
 
OTHER LIABILITIES
               
 
Notes payable
    27,134,946       35,904,542  
 
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
    7,165,544       5,221,730  
 
Guaranteed Undivided Beneficial Interest in Junior Subordinated Debentures (Trust Preferred Securities)
    4,000,000        
 
   
     
 
   
Total other liabilities
    38,300,490       41,126,272  
 
   
     
 
   
Total liabilities
    494,135,603       435,761,773  
 
   
     
 
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 19)
               
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
 
Common stock, no par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized; 7,862,380 and 8,037,078 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively
    15,096,638       14,679,226  
 
Additional paid-in capital
    2,745,062       6,054,368  
 
Retained earnings
    32,174,431       25,373,550  
 
Accumulated comprehensive income, net of taxes
    174,250       337,788  
 
   
     
 
   
Total stockholders’ equity
    50,190,381       46,444,932  
 
   
     
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
  $ 544,325,984     $ 482,206,705  
 
   
     
 

     See accompanying notes. 3


Table of Contents

COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

                               
          Years Ended December 31,
         
          2002   2001   2000
         
 
 
INTEREST INCOME
                       
 
Interest and fees on loans
  $ 35,334,245     $ 32,134,970     $ 29,472,770  
 
Interest on investments:
                       
   
Taxable investment securities
    1,035,059       1,614,918       2,402,691  
   
Nontaxable investment securities
    807,504       871,172       906,920  
 
Interest on federal funds sold
    99,071       40,038       109,878  
 
Other interest and dividend income
    340,172       417,221       474,869  
 
   
     
     
 
     
Total interest income
    37,616,051       35,078,319       33,367,128  
 
   
     
     
 
INTEREST EXPENSE
                       
 
Interest on interest-bearing deposit and savings accounts
    1,732,050       3,317,933       5,055,588  
 
Interest on time deposit accounts
    4,695,641       6,385,589       5,727,145  
 
Other borrowed funds
    1,354,438       1,879,647       1,473,614  
 
   
     
     
 
     
Total interest expense
    7,782,129       11,583,169       12,256,347  
 
   
     
     
 
NET INTEREST INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
    29,833,922       23,495,150       21,110,781  
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
    1,800,000       1,450,000       1,697,000  
 
   
     
     
 
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
    28,033,922       22,045,150       19,413,781  
 
   
     
     
 
NONINTEREST INCOME
                       
 
Service charges and fees
    4,089,240       3,013,734       2,596,294  
 
Mortgage Group revenues, net of expenses
    2,193,314       4,263,441       2,097,798  
 
Credit card discounts and fees
    419,762       357,729       283,668  
 
Financial Services Department income
    559,968       467,791       432,048  
 
Gain (loss) on sale of investment securities
    295,822       27,530       (6,046 )
 
Other noninterest income
    993,041       1,063,602       946,771  
 
   
     
     
 
     
Total noninterest income
    8,551,147       9,193,827       6,350,533  
 
   
     
     
 

 


Table of Contents

COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

                               
          Years Ended December 31,
         
          2002   2001   2000
         
 
 
NONINTEREST EXPENSES
                       
 
Salaries and employee benefits
    13,059,535       11,421,966       9,652,033  
 
Occupancy expense
    2,058,065       1,830,346       1,608,593  
 
Goodwill amortization
          628,623       628,623  
 
Data processing expense
    370,889       301,878       485,781  
 
Other noninterest expenses
    6,491,978       5,305,635       4,460,252  
 
 
   
     
     
 
     
Total noninterest expenses
    21,980,467       19,488,448       16,835,282  
 
   
     
     
 
INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
    14,604,602       11,750,529       8,929,032  
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
    5,223,497       4,376,812       3,304,997  
 
   
     
     
 
NET INCOME
    9,381,105       7,373,717       5,624,035  
 
   
     
     
 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
                       
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities:
                       
   
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period
    30,473       440,769       625,387  
   
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income
    (194,011 )     (18,064 )     3,990  
     
 
   
     
     
 
     
Other comprehensive income (loss)
    (163,538 )     422,705       629,377  
 
   
     
     
 
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
  $ 9,217,567     $ 7,796,422     $ 6,253,412  
 
   
     
     
 
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
  $ 1.16     $ 0.92     $ 0.70  
 
   
     
     
 
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
  $ 1.13     $ 0.89     $ 0.70  
 
   
     
     
 

     See accompanying notes. 5


Table of Contents

COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

                                                 
                                    Accumulated        
    Common Stock   Additional           Comprehensive   Total
   
  Paid-In   Retained     Income   Stockholders'
    Shares   Amount   Capital   Earnings   (Loss)   Equity
   
 
 
 
 
 
BALANCE, December 31, 1999
    8,010,522     $ 14,392,229     $ 6,371,490     $ 17,272,137     $ (714,294 )   $ 37,321,562  
Stock options exercised
    18,900       69,542                         69,542  
Income tax benefit from stock options exercised
                7,903                   7,903  
Cash dividends paid
                      (1,683,900 )           (1,683,900 )
Cash dividends declared
                      (642,354 )           (642,354 )
Net income and comprehensive income
                      5,624,035       629,377       6,253,412  
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
 
BALANCE, December 31, 2000
    8,029,422       14,461,771       6,379,393       20,569,918       (84,917 )     41,326,165  
Stock options exercised
    57,656       307,455                         307,455  
Income tax benefit from stock options exercised
                12,478                   12,478  
Stock repurchased
    (50,000 )     (90,000 )     (337,503 )                 (427,503 )
Cash dividends paid
                      (1,927,227 )           (1,927,227 )
Cash dividends declared
                      (642,858 )           (642,858 )
Net income and comprehensive income
                      7,373,717       422,705       7,796,422  
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
 
BALANCE, December 31, 2001
    8,037,078       14,679,226       6,054,368       25,373,550       337,788       46,444,932  
Stock options exercised
    153,724       1,008,572                         1,008,572  
Income tax benefit from stock options exercised
                122,704                   122,704  
Stock repurchased
    (328,422 )     (591,160 )     (3,432,010 )                 (4,023,170 )
Cash dividends paid
                      (1,951,234 )           (1,951,234 )
Cash dividends declared
                      (628,990 )           (628,990 )
Net income and comprehensive income
                      9,381,105       (163,538 )     9,217,567  
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
 
BALANCE, December 31, 2002
    7,862,380     $ 15,096,638     $ 2,745,062     $ 32,174,431     $ 174,250     $ 50,190,381  
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
 

6


Table of Contents

COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

                               
          Years Ended December 31,
         
          2002   2001   2000
         
 
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
                       
 
Net income
  $ 9,381,105     $ 7,373,717     $ 5,624,035  
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
                       
   
Amortization of premiums and discounts on investment securities
    65,407       36,135       30,180  
   
Loss (gain) on sale of available-for-sale securities
    (295,822 )     (27,530 )     6,046  
   
Loss on sale or write-down of property and equipment
    29,772             501  
   
Loss on sale or write-down of other real estate owned
    25,623       776        
   
(Gain) loss on call of held-to-maturity investment securities
    (1,512 )     161        
   
Depreciation and amortization
    2,267,649       2,163,353       1,780,284  
   
Impairment of mortgage servicing asset
    2,781,111       917,729        
   
Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividend
    (157,700 )     (123,200 )     (90,900 )
   
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense
    (692,556 )     1,262,560       80,978  
   
Provision for loan losses
    1,800,000       1,450,000       1,697,000  
 
Increase (decrease) in cash due to changes in certain assets and liabilities:
                       
   
Proceeds from the sale of mortgage loans held-for-sale
    239,365,825       318,259,993       117,490,853  
   
Production of mortgage loans held-for-sale
    (229,175,623 )     (331,901,669 )     (119,526,307 )
   
Accrued interest receivable
    (409,704 )     506,507       (1,089,439 )
   
Mortgage servicing asset
    (2,227,511 )     (4,750,197 )     (1,437,145 )
   
Other assets
    (326,919 )     (1,919,090 )     448,807  
   
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
    2,865,950       2,335,012       523,494  
 
 
   
     
     
 
     
Net cash from operating activities
    25,295,095       (4,415,743 )     5,538,387  
 
 
   
     
     
 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
                       
 
Proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities
    300,000       18,315,428       3,014,531  
 
Proceeds from the maturity of available-for-sale securities
    7,300,000       2,895,000       800,000  
 
Proceeds from the maturity of held-to-maturity securities
    4,078,785       2,330,442       2,479,371  
 
Purchases of held-to-maturity securities
    (81,579 )     (5,484,218 )     (1,887,266 )
 
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
    (4,000,000 )           (1,181,794 )
 
Purchases of restricted equity securities
    (468,200 )     (311,500 )     (449,900 )
 
Proceeds from sale of restricted equity securities
    487,013              
 
Net change in loans made to customers
    (64,947,534 )     (68,850,433 )     (52,567,673 )
 
Investment in low-income housing tax credits
    (10,000 )            
 
Investment in bank-owned life insurance
          (3,174,000 )      
 
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment
    25,269             27,331  
 
Proceeds from the sale of other real estate owned
    876,690       290,187        
 
Payments made for purchases of property and equipment
    (1,589,572 )     (1,151,825 )     (2,886,834 )
 
 
   
     
     
 
     
Net cash from investing activities
    (58,029,128 )     (55,140,919 )     (52,652,234 )
 
 
   
     
     
 
7

 


Table of Contents

                             
        Years Ended December 31,
       
        2002   2001   2000
       
 
 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
                       
 
Net change in demand deposit and savings accounts
    66,596,197       29,183,436       16,178,530  
 
Net change in time certificates
    (5,396,585 )     19,024,644       19,339,102  
 
Net increase (decrease) in notes payable
    (8,769,596 )     9,535,318       15,498,905  
 
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated debentures
    4,000,000              
 
Dividends paid
    (2,593,588 )     (2,569,581 )     (2,244,637 )
 
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
    1,008,572       307,455       69,542  
 
Repurchase of common stock
    (4,023,170 )     (427,503 )      
 
 
   
     
     
 
   
Net cash from financing activities
    50,821,830       55,053,769       48,841,442  
 
 
   
     
     
 
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
    18,087,797       (4,502,893 )     1,727,595  
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year
    22,613,738       27,116,631       25,389,036  
 
 
   
     
     
 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year
  $ 40,701,535     $ 22,613,738     $ 27,116,631  
 
 
   
     
     
 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
                       
 
Interest paid in cash
  $ 7,784,590     $ 11,705,699     $ 12,244,272  
 
 
   
     
     
 
 
Taxes paid in cash
  $ 5,919,000     $ 2,906,000     $ 2,972,000  
 
 
   
     
     
 
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
                       
 
Change in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes
  $ (163,538 )   $ 422,705     $ 629,377  
 
 
   
     
     
 
 
Cash dividend declared and payable after year-end
  $ 628,990     $ 642,858     $ 642,354  
 
 
   
     
     
 
 
Transfers of loans to other real estate owned
  $ 553,100     $ 640,176     $  
 
 
   
     
     
 

- 8 -

 


Table of Contents

     NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization and nature of operations — Columbia Bancorp (Columbia) was incorporated on October 3, 1995, and became the holding company of Columbia River Bank (the Bank) effective January 1, 1996. The Bank is a state-chartered financial institution authorized to provide banking services in the states of Oregon and Washington. With its administrative headquarters in The Dalles, Oregon, the Bank operates branch facilities in The Dalles, Hood River, Hermiston, Pendleton, McMinnville, Canby, Newberg, Troutdale, Madras, Redmond, and Bend, Oregon. In Washington, it operates branches in Goldendale and White Salmon. The Bank operates a mortgage banking division, Columbia River Bank Mortgage Group (the Mortgage Group), with administrative offices in Bend, Oregon. The Mortgage Group also has offices in The Dalles, Hermiston, Pendleton, Newport, Redmond, Madras, McMinnville, and Hood River, Oregon, and provides services to all banking branches of the Bank. Substantially all activity of Columbia is conducted through its subsidiary bank. The Bank, along with Columbia, is subject to the regulations of certain federal and state agencies and undergoes periodic examinations by those regulatory authorities.

On December 19, 2002, Columbia formed Columbia Bancorp Trust I, a wholly-owned Delaware statutory business trust, for purposes of issuing guaranteed undivided beneficial interests in junior subordinated debentures (Trust Preferred Securities). During December 2002, the Trust issued $4 million in Trust Preferred Securities. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions between Columbia and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

Management’s estimates and assumptions – The preparation of the consolidated financial statements, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet, and revenues and expenses for the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Significant estimations made by management primarily involve the calculation of the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of the mortgage servicing asset.

Cash and cash equivalents – Cash and cash equivalents normally include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, and federal funds sold. Cash and due from banks include amounts the Bank is required to maintain to meet certain average reserve and compensating balance requirements of the Federal Reserve. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Bank had no reserve requirement to be maintained at the Federal Reserve; however, total clearing balance requirements at December 31, 2002 and 2001, were $400,000.

 


Table of Contents

     NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (continued)

Investment securities – Columbia is required to specifically identify its investment securities as “held-to-maturity,” “available-for-sale,” or “trading accounts.” Accordingly, management has determined that all investment securities held at December 31, 2002 and 2001, are either “held-to-maturity” or “available-for-sale” and conform to the following accounting policies:

Securities held-to-maturity – Bonds, notes, and debentures for which Columbia has the intent and ability to hold to maturity are reported at cost, adjusted for premiums and discounts that are recognized in interest income, using the interest method over the period to maturity.

Securities available-for-sale – Available-for-sale securities consist of bonds, notes, debentures, and certain equity securities not classified as held-to-maturity securities. Securities are generally classified as available-for-sale if the instrument may be sold in response to such factors as (1) changes in market interest rates and related changes in the prepayment risk, (2) needs for liquidity, (3) changes in the availability of and the yield on alternative instruments, and (4) changes in funding sources and terms. Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of tax, on available-for-sale securities are reported as other comprehensive income and carried as accumulated comprehensive income or loss within stockholders’ equity until realized. Fair values for these investment securities are based on quoted market prices. Gains and losses on the sale of available-for-sale securities are determined using the specific-identification method.

Declines in the fair value of individual held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost that are other than temporary result in write-downs of the individual securities to their fair value. The related write-downs are included in earnings as realized losses. Premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the effective interest method over the period to maturity.

Restricted equity securities – Columbia’s equity investments in the Federal Home Loan Bank and the Federal Agriculture Mortgage Corporation are classified as restricted equity securities since ownership of these instruments is restricted and they do not have an active market. As restricted equity securities, these investments are carried at cost.

Loans held-for-sale – Mortgage loans held-for-sale are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair market value. Fair market value is determined on an aggregate loan basis. At December 31, 2002 and 2001, mortgage loans held-for-sale were carried at cost which approximated fair market value.

2


Table of Contents

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (continued)

Loans, net of allowance for loan losses and unearned loan fees – Loans are stated at the amount of unpaid principal, reduced by an allowance for loan losses and unearned loan fees. Interest on loans is calculated by using the simple-interest method on daily balances of the principal amount outstanding. The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expenses. Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that the collectibility of the principal is unlikely. The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb possible losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible, based on evaluations of the collectibility of loans and prior loan loss experience. The evaluations take into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans, and current economic conditions that may affect the borrower’s ability to pay. Various regulatory agencies, as a regular part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank’s reserve for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Bank to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of the examinations.

Impaired loans are carried at the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s market price, or the fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Accrual of interest is discontinued on impaired loans when management believes, after considering economic and business conditions, collection efforts, and collateral position, that the borrower’s financial condition is such that collection of interest is doubtful. When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Interest income is subsequently recognized only to the extent cash payments are received or when the loan is removed from nonaccrual status.

Loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs are capitalized and recognized as an adjustment of the yield over the life of the related loan.

Property and equipment – Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line and accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to seven years for furniture and equipment and 31-½ years for building premises.

Goodwill – Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired from the purchase of Valley Community Bancorp in 1998, and was amortized by the straight-line method over a 15-year period up to December 31, 2001. Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” the Bank ceased amortization of goodwill effective January 1, 2002, and completed its initial assessment of goodwill impairment in March 2002 and the annual assessment in December 2002. Goodwill impairment is deemed to exist if the net book value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value. Columbia’s reporting units are generally consistent with the operating segments identified in Note 23 – Segment Information. Neither the initial or annual assessment identified impairment of goodwill such that the net book value of the reporting unit exceeded its estimated fair value.

3


Table of Contents

NOTE 1 — ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (continued)

The following summarizes the Bank’s recorded goodwill and the effects of adoption of SFAS No. 142 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000:

                           
      2002   2001   2000
     
 
 
Reported net income
  $ 9,381,105     $ 7,373,717     $ 5,624,035  
Add back goodwill amortization
          628,623       628,623  
 
   
     
     
 
Adjusted net income
  $ 9,381,105     $ 8,002,340     $ 6,252,658  
 
   
     
     
 
Basic earnings per share:
                       
 
Reported
  $ 1.16     $ 0.92     $ 0.70  
 
Adjusted
  $ 1.16     $ 1.00     $ 0.78  
Diluted earnings per share:
                       
 
Reported
  $ 1.13     $ 0.89     $ 0.70  
 
Adjusted
  $ 1.13     $ 0.97     $ 0.77  

Mortgage servicing asset, net of amortization and valuation allowance – The mortgage servicing asset (MSA) is amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing revenues. Impairment of the mortgage servicing asset is assessed based on the fair value of those rights. Fair values are estimated using discounted cash flows of servicing revenues less servicing costs based on current market interest rates, inflation rates, and industry prepayment rates in accordance with SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.” The amount of a valuation allowance recognized is the amount by which the capitalized mortgage servicing asset exceeds the calculated fair value.

Investments in limited partnership – Columbia owns approximately a 10% interest in a limited partnership that owns and operates affordable housing projects. Investment in this project serves as an element of Columbia’s compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act, and Columbia receives tax benefits in the form of deductions for operating losses and tax credits. The tax credits may be used to reduce taxes currently payable or may be carried back one year or forward twenty years to recapture or reduce taxes. Columbia uses the equity method in operating results and tax credits are recorded in the years they become available to reduce income taxes.

4


Table of Contents

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (continued)

Other real estate owned – Other real estate, acquired through foreclosure or deeds in lieu of foreclosure, is carried at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value. When property is acquired, any excess of the loan balance over its estimated net realizable value is charged to the reserve for loan losses. Subsequent write-downs to net realizable value, if any, or any disposition gains or losses are included in noninterest income and expense. At December 31, 2001, the Bank held $349,213 in other real estate owned. The Bank held no other real estate owned as of December 31, 2002.

Income taxes – Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the tax effects of the differences between the book and tax bases of the various balance sheet assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes.

Advertising – Advertising costs are charged to expense during the year in which they are incurred. Advertising expenses include promotional expenses such as public relations costs and donations, and were $553,743, $566,831, and $520,189 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively.

Earnings per share – Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, after giving retroactive effect to stock dividends and splits. Diluted earnings per share is computed similar to basic earnings per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued. Included in the denominator is the dilutive effect of stock options computed under the treasury stock method.

5


Table of Contents

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (continued)

Stock options – Columbia applies Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations in accounting for its stock option plans. Accordingly, compensation costs are recognized as the difference between the exercise price of each option and the market price of Columbia’s stock at the date of each grant. Had compensation cost for Columbia’s 2002, 2001, and 2000 grants for stock-based compensation plans been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” its net income and earnings per common share for December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, would approximate the pro forma amounts below (in thousands, except per share data).

                           
      2002   2001   2000
     
 
 
Net income:
                       
 
As reported
  $ 9,381     $ 7,374     $ 5,624  
 
Pro forma
  $ 8,570     $ 6,823     $ 5,486  
Basic earnings per common share:
                       
 
As reported
  $ 1.16     $ 0.92     $ 0.70  
 
Pro forma
  $ 1.06     $ 0.85     $ 0.68  
Diluted earnings per common share:
                       
 
As reported
  $ 1.13     $ 0.89     $ 0.70  
 
Pro forma
  $ 1.03     $ 0.83     $ 0.68  

The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions for December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000:

                         
    2002   2001   2000
   
 
 
Dividend yield
    2.14 %     3.00 %     4.84 %
Expected life (years)
    6.00       3.32       3.32  
Expected volatility
    45.25 %     29.77 %     35.78 %
Risk-free rate
    2.08 %     3.74 %     5.11 %

The effects of applying SFAS No. 123 in this pro forma disclosure are not indicative of future amounts.

6


Table of Contents

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (continued)

Off-balance-sheet financial instruments – In the ordinary course of business, the Bank enters into off-balance-sheet financial instruments consisting of commitments to extend credit, commitments under credit card arrangements, commercial letters of credit, and standby letters of credit. These financial instruments are recorded in the financial statements when they are funded or related fees are incurred or received.

Derivative financial instruments – In 2000, Columbia adopted SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities,” and SFAS No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” All derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, are recognized in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value. SFAS No. 133 dictates that the accounting treatment for gains or losses from changes in the derivative instrument’s fair value is contingent on whether the derivative instrument qualifies as a hedge under the accounting standard. On the date Columbia enters into a derivative contract, Columbia designates the derivative instrument’s as (1) a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment (fair value hedge), (2) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (cash flow hedge), or (3) hedge for trading, customer accommodation or not qualifying for hedge accounting (free-standing derivative instruments). For a fair value hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument and changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment attributable to the hedged risk are recorded in current period net income. For a cash flow hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument to the extent that it is effective are recorded in other comprehensive income, net of tax, within stockholders’ equity and subsequently reclassified to net income in the same period(s) that the hedged transaction impacts net income. For free-standing derivative instruments, changes in the fair values are reported in current period net income. Columbia formally documents the relationship between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as the risk management objective and strategy for undertaking any hedge transaction. This process includes linking all derivative instruments that are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or to specific forecasted transactions. Columbia uses forward sales contract derivatives as a strategy to mitigate the risk associated with interest rate volatility. Columbia also formally assesses both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivative instruments used are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items.

Fair value of financial instruments — The following methods and assumptions were used by Columbia in estimating fair values of financial instruments as disclosed herein:

Cash and cash equivalents – The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments approximate their fair value.

7


Table of Contents

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (continued)

Held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, and restricted equity securities – Fair values for investment securities, excluding restricted equity securities, are based on quoted market prices. The carrying values of restricted equity securities approximate fair values.

Loans receivable – For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and have no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values for certain mortgage loans (for example, one-to-four family residential), credit card loans, and other consumer loans are based on quoted market prices of similar loans sold in conjunction with securitization transactions, adjusted for differences in loan characteristics. Fair values for commercial real estate and commercial loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Fair values for impaired loans are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis or underlying collateral values, where applicable.

Deposit liabilities – The fair values disclosed for demand deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (that is, their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts of variable-rate money market accounts and fixed-term certificates of deposit (CDs) approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate CDs are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.

Short-term borrowings – The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, borrowings under repurchase agreements, and other short-term borrowings maturing within 90 days approximate their fair values. Fair values of other short-term borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the Bank’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Long-term debt – The fair values of the Bank’s long-term debt is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on the Bank’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Accrued interest – The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate their fair values.

Off-balance-sheet instruments – The Bank’s off-balance-sheet instruments include unfunded commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. The fair value of these instruments is not considered practicable to estimate because of the lack of quoted market prices and the inability to estimate fair value without incurring excessive costs.

8


Table of Contents

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (continued)

Recently issued accounting standards – In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure — an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123.” This statement amends FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this statement amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. Columbia’s management intends to continue using the intrinsic value method for stock-based employee compensation arrangements and, therefore, does not expect that the application provisions of this statement will have a material impact on Columbia’s consolidated financial statements.

In October 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 147, “Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions.” This statement provides guidance on the accounting for the acquisition of a financial institution and applies to all acquisitions except those between two or more mutual enterprises. Columbia’s management does not expect that the application provisions of this statement will have a material impact on Columbia’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (Including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring).” The statement is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002, with early application encouraged. Columbia’s management does not expect that the application of the provisions of this statement will have a material impact on Columbia’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections.” This statement rescinds FASB Statement No. 4, “Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt,” and an amendment of that statement, FASB Statement No. 64, “Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements.” This statement also rescinds FASB Statement No. 44, “Accounting for Intangible Assets of Motor Carriers.” This statement amends FASB Statement No. 13, “Accounting for Leases,” to eliminate an inconsistency between the required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. This statement also amends other existing authoritative pronouncements to make various technical corrections, clarify meanings, or describe their applicability under conflicting conditions. Columbia’s management does not expect that the application of the provisions of this statement will have a material impact on Columbia’s consolidated financial statements.

9


Table of Contents

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (continued)

In January 2003, FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” This interpretation clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” and requires existing unconsolidated variable interest entities to be consolidated by their primary beneficiaries if the entities do not effectively disperse risks among parties involved. This interpretation explains how to identify variable interest entities and how an enterprise assesses its interests in a variable interest entity to decide whether to consolidate that entity. This interpretation applies immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003, and to variable interest entities in which an enterprise obtains an interest after that date. It applies in the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003, to entities in which an enterprise holds a variable interest that is acquired before February 1, 2003. The interpretation applies to public enterprises as of the beginning of the applicable interim or annual period. Columbia’s management does not expect that the application of the provisions of this interpretation will have a material impact on Columbia’s consolidated financial statements.

In November 2002, FASB issued Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45), “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.” This interpretation elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing a guarantee. The disclosure requirements of FIN 45 are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 31, 2002, and the initial recognition and initial measurement provisions shall be applied on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. Columbia’s management does not expect that the application of the provisions of this interpretation will have a material impact on Columbia’s consolidated financial statements.

Reclassifications – Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2001 and 2000 financial statements to conform with current year presentations.

10


Table of Contents

NOTE 2 – INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The amortized cost and estimated fair values of Columbia’s investment securities at December 31, 2002 and 2001, are summarized as follows:

                                   
              Gross   Gross   Estimated
      Amortized   Unrealized   Unrealized   Fair
      Cost   Gains   Losses   Value
     
 
 
 
December 31, 2002:
                               
Available-for-sale securities:
                               
 
Obligations of U.S government agencies
  $ 11,499,888     $ 143,700     $     $ 11,643,588  
 
Corporate debt securities
    1,228,919       37,253             1,266,172  
 
Corporate equity securities
    112,987                   112,987  
 
Municipal securities
    1,643,884       83,063             1,726,947  
 
 
   
     
     
     
 
 
  $ 14,485,678     $ 264,016     $     $ 14,749,694  
 
 
   
     
     
     
 
Held-to-maturity securities:
                               
 
Mortgage-backed securities
  $ 3,770,306     $ 149,815     $     $ 3,920,121  
 
Municipal securities
    14,748,450       689,734       (536 )     15,437,648  
 
Obligations of U.S government agencies
    81,579                   81,579  
 
 
   
     
     
     
 
 
  $ 18,600,335     $ 839,549     $ (536 )   $ 19,439,348  
 
 
   
     
     
     
 

11


Table of Contents

NOTE 2 – INVESTMENT SECURITIES – (continued)

                                   
              Gross   Gross   Estimated
      Amortized   Unrealized   Unrealized   Fair
      Cost   Gains   Losses   Value
     
 
 
 
December 31, 2001:
                               
Available-for-sale securities:
                               
 
U.S. Treasury securities
  $ 1,004,320     $ 11,517     $     $ 1,015,837  
 
Obligations of U.S government agencies
    13,799,133       408,668             14,207,801  
 
Corporate debt securities
    1,233,885       47,211             1,281,096  
 
Corporate equity securities
    300,000                   300,000  
 
Municipal securities
    1,943,657       53,716             1,997,373  
 
 
   
     
     
     
 
 
  $ 18,280,995     $ 521,112     $     $ 18,802,107  
 
 
   
     
     
     
 
Held-to-maturity securities:
                               
 
Mortgage-backed securities
  $ 6,915,536     $ 41,768     $ (14,074 )   $ 6,943,230  
 
Municipal securities
    15,741,728       217,244       (58,643 )     15,900,329  
 
 
   
     
     
     
 
 
  $ 22,657,264     $ 259,012     $ (72,717 )   $ 22,843,559  
 
 
   
     
     
     
 

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities at December 31, 2002, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

12


Table of Contents

NOTE 2 – INVESTMENT SECURITIES – (continued)

                                 
    Available-For-Sale   Held-To-Maturity
   
 
            Estimated           Estimated
    Amortized   Fair   Amortized   Fair
    Cost   Value   Cost   Value
   
 
 
 
Due in one year or less
  $ 8,033,927     $ 8,174,547     $ 5,215,443     $ 5,376,120  
Due after one year through five years
    6,132,824       6,234,124       2,749,413       2,869,079  
Due after five years through ten years
    205,940       228,036       8,022,225       8,455,934  
Due after ten years
                2,613,254       2,738,215  
 
   
     
     
     
 
 
    14,372,691       14,636,707       18,600,335       19,439,348  
Corporate equity securities
    112,987       112,987              
 
   
     
     
     
 
 
  $ 14,485,678     $ 14,749,694     $ 18,600,335     $ 19,439,348  
 
   
     
     
     
 

For the purpose of the maturity table, mortgage-backed securities, which are not due at a single maturity date, have been allocated over maturity groupings based on the weighted-average contractual maturities of underlying collateral. Mortgage-backed securities may mature earlier than their weighted-average contractual maturities because of principal prepayments.

As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, investment securities with an amortized cost of $15,270,194 and $20,850,183, respectively, have been pledged to secure notes payable at the Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve and public and other deposits, as required by law.

NOTE 3 – RESTRICTED EQUITY SECURITIES

The composition of restricted equity securities is as follows:

                 
    2002   2001
   
 
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
  $ 2,688,800     $ 2,062,900  
Federal Agriculture Mortgage Corporation stock
    9,400       9,400  
 
   
     
 
 
  $ 2,698,200     $ 2,072,300  
 
   
     
 

13


Table of Contents

NOTE 4 – LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

The loan portfolio consists of the following:

                 
    2002   2001
   
 
Commercial
  $ 69,881,954     $ 64,163,290  
Agriculture
    61,770,202       54,934,115  
Real estate
    181,456,664       153,204,595  
Real estate – construction
    91,035,925       70,473,600  
Consumer
    20,936,603       19,802,296  
Credit card and other loans
    6,497,855       5,250,634  
 
   
     
 
 
    431,579,203       367,828,530  
Less allowance for loan losses
    (6,416,691 )     (5,311,715 )
Less unearned loan fees
    (1,244,957 )     (1,193,694 )
 
   
     
 
 
  $ 423,917,555     $ 361,323,121  
 
   
     
 

Restructured and other loans considered impaired had a recorded investment of approximately $1,028,000 and $1,147,000 at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The Bank’s average investment in impaired loans, measured on the basis of the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans’ effective interest rates, was approximately $1,076,000 and $1,188,000 during 2002 and 2001, respectively. The total allowance for loan losses related to these loans at December 31, 2002 and 2001, was approximately $253,000 and $286,000, respectively. Had the impaired loans performed according to their original terms, additional interest income of $215,663, $209,415, and $183,248 would have been recognized in 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. No interest income has been recognized on impaired loans during the period of impairment.

Changes in the allowance for loan losses were as follows:

                         
    2002   2001   2000
   
 
 
BALANCE, beginning of year
  $ 5,311,715     $ 4,577,941     $ 3,298,460  
Provision for loan losses
    1,800,000       1,450,000       1,697,000  
Loans charged off
    (886,156 )     (799,583 )     (459,824 )
Loan recoveries
    191,132       83,357       42,305  
 
   
     
     
 
BALANCE, end of year
  $ 6,416,691     $ 5,311,715     $ 4,577,941  
 
   
     
     
 

14


Table of Contents

NOTE 5 – MORTGAGE SERVICING ASSET

Mortgages serviced for others, which totaled $486.8 million and $416.3 million at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. However, mortgage servicing asset (MSA) relating to this portfolio is recorded by the Bank as an asset based on calculations using a discounted cash flow model, which incorporates the expected life of the loans, estimated costs to service the loans, servicing fees to be received, and other factors, in accordance with SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.” The key assumptions used to value the MSA at December 31, 2002, were as follows:

                         
    30-year   15-year   7-year
   
 
 
Weighted-average term to maturity (months)
    341       164       74  
Constant prepayment rate
    12.4 %     9.2 %     14.6 %
Servicing cost, net of ancillary income
  $ 19.50     $ 19.50     $ 19.50  
Discount rate
    8.9 %     8.9 %     8.9 %

The changes in the balance of the MSA were as follows:

                         
    2002   2001   2000
   
 
 
MSA balance, beginning of year
  $ 6,196,801     $ 2,759,687     $ 1,482,374  
Additions for capitalized servicing right premiums
    2,227,511       4,750,197       1,437,145  
Amortization of MSA
    (1,028,810 )     (395,354 )     (159,832 )
Valuation allowance adjustments
    (2,781,111 )     (917,729 )      
 
   
     
     
 
 
  $ 4,614,391     $ 6,196,801     $ 2,759,687  
 
   
     
     
 

The valuation allowance provides for adjustments to the cost basis of the total mortgage servicing assets to estimated fair value. The fair value adjustment is recorded as an adjustment to the income of the Bank’s Mortgage Group when recognized.

15


Table of Contents

NOTE 6 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

The major classifications of property and equipment are summarized as follows:

                 
    2002   2001
   
 
Land
  $ 3,491,377     $ 3,491,377  
Construction in progress
    145,741       67,054  
Buildings and improvements
    10,153,556       9,865,897  
Furniture and equipment
    6,521,588       7,084,983  
 
   
     
 
 
    20,312,262       20,509,311  
Less accumulated depreciation
    (6,128,411 )     (6,621,465 )
 
   
     
 
 
  $ 14,183,851     $ 13,887,846  
 
   
     
 

For certain bank branch facilities, Columbia leases office space from third parties. Minimum future rentals on noncancellable leases for the next five years beginning in 2003 are approximately $93,000, $94,000, $94,000, $80,000, and $74,000. Minimum lease rentals for the year 2008 and thereafter are approximately $153,000.

NOTE 7 – TIME CERTIFICATES

Time certificates of deposit of $100,000 and over, aggregated $44,746,175 and $37,457,669 at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Brokered time certificates had an aggregate carrying value of $16,179,793 at December 31, 2002. There were no brokered deposits at December 31, 2001.

At December 31, 2002, the scheduled maturities for all time deposits are as follows:

                 
Years ending December 31,
    2003     $ 62,395,641  
 
    2004       19,332,342  
 
    2005       13,260,961  
 
    2006       12,398,297  
 
    2007       2,930,502  
 
    Thereafter     1,194,632  
 
           
 
 
          $ 111,512,375  
 
           
 

16


Table of Contents

NOTE 8 – LINES OF CREDIT AND BORROWED FUNDS

The Bank has federal funds lines of credit agreements with six financial institutions and the Federal Reserve. The maximum borrowings available under these lines totaled $53,280,000. These lines support short-term liquidity and cannot be used for more than one to fifteen consecutive business days, depending on the lending institution. At December 31, 2002 and 2001, there were no borrowings outstanding under these agreements.

The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of Seattle and has entered into credit arrangements with the FHLB. Borrowings under the credit arrangements are collateralized by the Bank’s FHLB stock as well as loans or other instruments which may be pledged. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Bank had total borrowings outstanding with the FHLB of $26,284,946 and $35,453,969, respectively, including $3,000,000 outstanding under a “Cash Management Advance” agreement at December 31, 2001. The maximum borrowings available under the Cash Management Advance agreement were $72,915,150 at December 31, 2002. Interest rates on the promissory notes and under the Cash Management Advance agreement range from 1.59% to 6.08%.

The Bank also participates in the U.S. Treasury Department’s Treasury Investment Program, which facilitates the acceptance and processing of federal tax deposits. Under this program, the Bank is authorized to accumulate daily tax payments up to authorized limits, and deploy the funds in short-term investments. In exchange, the Bank is required to issue a fully collateralized demand note to the U.S. Treasury and pay interest at the federal funds rate minus 25 basis points. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Bank had $850,000 and $450,573, respectively, outstanding under this program.

The maturity of notes payable is as follows:

                 
Years ending December 31,
    2003     $ 11,578,495  
 
    2004       3,254,480  
 
    2005       3,750,000  
 
    2006       1,000,000  
 
    2007       6,500,000  
 
    Thereafter     1,051,971  
 
           
 
 
          $ 27,134,946  
 
           
 

17


Table of Contents

NOTE 9 – TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES

In December 2002, Columbia formed a wholly-owned Delaware statutory business trust subsidiary, Columbia Bancorp Trust I (the Trust), which issued $4,000,000 of guaranteed undivided beneficial interests in Columbia’s Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures (Trust Preferred Securities). These debentures qualify as Tier 1 capital under Federal Reserve Board guidelines. All of the common securities of the Trust are owned by Columbia. The proceeds from the issuance of the common securities and the Trust Preferred Securities were used by Columbia Bancorp Trust I to purchase $4,124,000 million of junior subordinated debentures of Columbia. The debentures which represent the sole asset of the Trust, accrue and pay distributions quarterly at a variable rate of 90-day LIBOR plus 3.3% per annum of the stated liquidation value of $1,000 per capital security. Columbia has entered into contractual arrangements which, taken collectively, fully and unconditionally guarantee payment of: (i) accrued and unpaid distributions required to be paid on the Trust Preferred Securities; (ii) the redemption price with respect to any Trust Preferred Securities called for redemption by the Trust, and (iii) payments due upon a voluntary or involuntary dissolution, winding up or liquidation of the Trust. The Trust Preferred Securities are mandatorily redeemable upon maturity of the debentures on January 7, 2033, or upon earlier redemption as provided in the indenture. Columbia has the right to redeem the debentures purchased by the Trust in whole or in part, on or after January 7, 2008. As specified in the indenture, if the debentures are redeemed prior to maturity, the redemption price will be the principal amount and any accrued but unpaid interest.

NOTE 10 – INTEREST RATE SWAP

During January 2003, in connection with the issuance of $4,000,000 of floating-rate Trust Preferred Securities described in Note 9, Columbia entered into an interest rate swap agreement with an unrelated third party. Under the terms of the agreement, which expires in January 2008, Columbia will pay 3.27% on a notional amount of $4,000,000 and receive 90-day LIBOR on the same amount. The effect of this transaction was the conversion of the $4,000,0000 trust preferred issuance from a floating rate at 90-day LIBOR plus 330 basis points to a fixed rate of 6.57% for five years, the point at which Columbia has the option to call the Trust Preferred Securities as described in Note 9. Columbia has classified the swap agreement as a cash flow hedge in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”

18


Table of Contents

NOTE 11 – INCOME TAXES

The provision for income taxes consists of the following:

                           
      2002   2001   2000
     
 
 
Current tax provision:
                       
 
Federal
  $ 4,989,761     $ 2,597,008     $ 2,696,053  
 
State
    926,292       517,244       527,966  
 
 
   
     
     
 
 
    5,916,053       3,114,252       3,224,019  
 
 
   
     
     
 
Deferred tax (benefit) expense:
                       
 
Federal
    (613,200 )     1,117,892       71,700  
 
State
    (79,356 )     144,668       9,278  
 
 
   
     
     
 
 
    (692,556 )     1,262,560       80,978  
 
 
   
     
     
 
 
  $ 5,223,497     $ 4,376,812     $ 3,304,997  
 
 
   
     
     
 

The components of the deferred tax expense consist of the following:

                           
      2002   2001   2000
     
 
 
Mortgage servicing rights
  $ (601,316 )   $ 1,306,104     $ 529,587  
Loan loss provision not deductible for tax
    (371,906 )     (275,426 )     (518,947 )
Difference between book and tax depreciation methods
    217,179       195,279       77,986  
Difference between accrual and cash basis tax reporting
          (17,406 )     (28,158 )
Deferred compensation expense
    (22,933 )     7,083       (43,714 )
Difference between book and tax recognition of Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends
    60,031       46,926       36,700  
Cash surrender value greater than investment in life insurance policies
    101,584              
Other differences
    (75,195 )           27,524  
 
   
     
     
 
 
Deferred tax (benefit) expense
  $ (692,556 )   $ 1,262,560     $ 80,978  
 
   
     
     
 

19


Table of Contents

NOTE 11 – INCOME TAXES – (continued)

The net deferred tax liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets consists of the following:

                     
        2002   2001
       
 
Deferred tax assets:
               
 
Allowance for loan losses
  $ 2,213,529     $ 1,841,623  
 
Deferred compensation
    144,729       121,796  
 
Other
    75,195        
 
 
   
     
 
 
    2,433,453       1,963,419  
 
 
   
     
 
Deferred tax liabilities:
               
 
Mortgage servicing rights
    (1,753,469 )     (2,354,785 )
 
Accumulated depreciation
    (1,077,737 )     (860,558 )
 
Cash surrender value greater than life insurance policies
    (101,584 )      
 
Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends
    (266,554 )     (206,523 )
 
 
   
     
 
 
    (3,199,344 )     (3,421,866 )
 
 
   
     
 
   
Net deferred tax liability
  $ (765,891 )   $ (1,458,447 )
 
 
   
     
 

Management believes, based upon Columbia’s historical performance, that the deferred tax asset will be realized in the normal course of operations and, accordingly, management has not reduced deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance.

The tax provision differs from the federal statutory rate of 34% due principally to the effect of tax exemptions for interest received on municipal investments and the amortization of nondeductible goodwill for tax purposes.

20


Table of Contents

NOTE 11 – INCOME TAXES – (continued)

A reconciliation between the statutory federal income tax rate and the effective tax rate is as follows:

                         
    2002   2001   2000
   
 
 
Federal income taxes at statutory rate
  $ 4,965,565     $ 3,995,180     $ 3,035,871  
State income tax expense, net of federal income tax benefit
    549,190       474,257       357,649  
Effect of nontaxable interest income
    (257,239 )     (263,510 )     (268,236 )
Effect of nondeductible goodwill amortization
          213,732       213,732  
Other
    (34,019 )     (42,847 )     (34,019 )
 
   
     
     
 
 
  $ 5,223,497     $ 4,376,812     $ 3,304,997  
 
   
     
     
 
 
    36 %     37 %     37 %
 
   
     
     
 

21


Table of Contents

NOTE 12 – EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the year. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if common shares were issued pursuant to the exercise of options under existing stock option plans. The following table illustrates the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000.

                           
      2002   2001   2000
     
 
 
Basic earnings per share:
                       
 
Income available to common stockholders
  $ 9,381,105     $ 7,373,717     $ 5,624,035  
 
 
   
     
     
 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
    8,091,494       8,033,119       8,016,683  
 
 
   
     
     
 
Earnings per share
  $ 1.16     $ 0.92     $ 0.70  
 
 
   
     
     
 
Diluted earnings per share:
                       
 
Income available to common stockholders
  $ 9,381,105     $ 7,373,717     $ 5,624,035  
 
 
   
     
     
 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
    8,091,494       8,033,119       8,016,683  
Net effect of dilutive stock options – based on the treasury stock method using average market price
    210,994       210,784       63,685  
 
 
   
     
     
 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding and common stock equivalents
    8,302,488       8,243,903       8,080,368  
 
 
   
     
     
 
Diluted earnings per share
  $ 1.13     $ 0.89     $ 0.70  
 
 
   
     
     
 

Outstanding common stock options excluded from diluted earnings per share because their impact on the calculation would have been antidilutive totaled 148,343, 3,000, and 144,359 at December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively.

22


Table of Contents

NOTE 13 – STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS

Columbia maintains a stock incentive plan originally adopted by the Bank in 1993 prior to Columbia’s formation. The plan, most recently amended in January 2002 and ratified by the stockholders in April 2002, allows for the granting of both incentive and nonstatutory stock options. The option price for incentive stock options is determined by Columbia’s Board of Directors and cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. The incentive stock options expire ten years from the date of grant. The option price and duration of options for nonstatutory stock options is also determined by the Board of Directors.

The following summarizes options available and outstanding under this plan.

                                           
                              Weighted-        
                      Non-   Average   Weighted-
      Total   Incentive   statutory   Exercise   Average
      Options   Options   Options   Price   Fair Value
     
 
 
 
 
Options under grant and exercisable – December 31, 1999
    271,398       204,628       66,770     $ 4.60          
Options granted in 2000:
                                       
 
Incentive stock options
    128,600       128,600           $ 6.88     $ 1.47  
 
Nonstatutory stock options
    14,000             14,000     $ 6.88     $ 1.47  
Options exercised in 2000:
                                       
 
Incentive stock options
    (11,500 )     (11,500 )         $ 3.47          
 
Nonstatutory stock options
    (7,400 )           (7,400 )     4.01          
Options expired or forfeited in 2000
    (27,000 )     (25,000 )     (2,000 )   $ 6.70          
 
 
   
     
     
     
         
Options under grant and exercisable – December 31, 2000
    368,098       296,728       71,370     $ 5.58          
Options granted in 2001:
                                       
 
Incentive stock options
    270,750       270,750           $ 8.25     $ 1.53  
 
Nonstatutory stock options
    55,638             55,638     $ 9.27     $ 1.31  
Gifted shares in 2001
    400             400     $          
Options exercised in 2001:
                                       
 
Incentive stock options
    (39,759 )     (39,759 )         $ 5.28          
 
Nonstatutory stock options
    (17,897 )           (17,897 )   $ 5.46          
Options expired or forfeited in 2001
    (2,500 )     (1,500 )     (1,000 )   $ 7.38          
 
 
   
     
     
     
         

23


Table of Contents

NOTE 13 – STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS – (continued)

                                           
                              Weighted-        
                      Non-   Average   Weighted-
      Total   Incentive   statutory   Exercise   Average
      Options   Options   Options   Price   Fair Value
     
 
 
 
 
Options under grant and exercisable – December 31, 2001
    634,730       526,219       108,511     $ 7.07          
Options granted in 2002:
                                       
 
Incentive stock options
    153,343       153,343           $ 14.79     $ 5.47  
 
Nonstatutory stock options
    14,000             14,000     $ 11.71     $ 4.49  
Options exercised in 2002:
                                       
 
Incentive stock options
    (124,630 )     (124,630 )         $ 6.37          
 
Nonstatutory stock options
    (29,094 )           (29,094 )   $ 7.38          
Options expired or forfeited in 2002
    (5,400 )     (5,400 )         $ 7.18          
 
   
     
     
     
         
Options under grant and exercisable – December 31, 2002
    642,949       549,532       93,417     $ 9.03          
 
   
     
     
     
         
Options reserved – December 31, 2002
    143,289                                  
 
   
                                 

24


Table of Contents

NOTE 13 – STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS – (continued)

The following table summarizes information about fixed-stock options outstanding at December 31, 2002, under Columbia’s various stock option plans:

                                         
Incentive Stock Options   Nonstatutory Stock Options

 
                         
    Number   Average           Number   Average
    of Options   Remaining           of Options   Remaining
    Outstanding   Contractual       Outstanding   Contractual
Exercise   and   Life   Exercise   and   Life
Price   Exercisable   (in years)   Price   Exercisable   (in years)

 
 
 
 
 
$2.11
    5,902       0.5     $ 3.34       15,750       2.5  
$3.34
    37,628       2.5     $ 5.59       16,197       4.6  
$5.59
    61,790       4.6     $ 7.75       1,000       6.5  
$11.50
    3,000       5.3     $ 6.88       6,650       7.0  
$8.00
    1,000       6.4     $ 7.25       8,050       8.1  
$7.75
    2,000       6.4     $ 9.86       34,220       9.0  
$6.88
    80,256       7.0     $ 11.71       11,550       9.6  
$7.25
    15,444       8.1     $              
$7.25
    97,610       8.1     $              
$8.25
    2,500       8.5     $              
$9.86
    89,059       9.0     $              
$11.10
    3,000       9.2     $              
$11.40
    2,000       9.3     $              
$14.91
    148,343       10.0     $              
 
   
             
                 
 
    549,532                       93,417          
 
   
                     
         

Under the 2002 stock option plan, an aggregate of no more than 10% of the issued and outstanding shares of Columbia common stock is available for award or grant. At December 31, 2002, 10% of Columbia’s issued and outstanding shares amounted to 786,238 shares of common stock.

25


Table of Contents

NOTE 14 – EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Columbia has established an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) for the benefit of its employees. The ESOP allows participation by all employees over the age of 20 who have also met minimum service requirements. Contributions to the ESOP are at the discretion of the Board of Directors and are used to purchase shares of Columbia’s common stock. Employees are not permitted to contribute individually to the ESOP but vest in their proportionate share of the ESOP interest after six years of participation. The allocated shares in the ESOP are considered outstanding for purposes of calculating earnings per share. For the years ending December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, Columbia contributed $100,000, $280,000, and $250,000, respectively, to the ESOP.

The ESOP’s assets as of December 31 were as follows:

                 
    2002   2001
   
 
Allocated shares
    361,446       353,474  
 
   
     
 
Cash on hand
  $ 36,151     $ 27,426  
 
   
     
 

Columbia has also adopted a 401(k) savings investment plan which allows employees to defer certain amounts of compensation for income tax purposes under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Essentially, all employees over the age of 18 are eligible to participate in the plan. Employees may elect to defer and contribute up to the statutory limits. Their contributions and those of Columbia, which are limited to 100% of employee contributions up to 4% of total participant compensation, are invested by plan trustees in employee-designated funds. For the years ending December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, Columbia contributed approximately $456,000, $128,000, and $112,000, respectively, to the plan.

Columbia has established an employee incentive compensation program which provides eligible participants additional compensation based upon the achievement of certain Bank goals. For the years ending December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, additional compensation of approximately $2,227,000, $1,302,000, and $1,238,000, respectively, was paid to eligible employees pursuant to this program.

Columbia entered into both employment and retirement agreements, beginning in 1996 and later amended, with its former chief executive officer. The employment agreement provided for the chief executive’s salary and customary benefits until the agreement terminated upon retirement in May 2001. The retirement agreement provides annual post-retirement compensation for a seven-year period after the chief executive’s retirement. A portion of Columbia’s obligation under the agreement was funded with a $120,000 interest-earning investment and will be paid in annual installments of $48,000 plus interest earned on invested funds. For the year ended December 31, 2002, Columbia had a liability recorded of approximately $240,000 as its obligation for past services pursuant to the retirement plan.

26


Table of Contents

NOTE 14 – EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS – (continued)

During 2001, Columbia purchased bank-owned life insurance (BOLI) to support life insurance, salary continuation, and deferred compensation benefits for certain key employees. At December 31, 2002 and 2001, Columbia recognized a salary continuation liability of $121,076 and $26,884, respectively, and an elective deferred compensation liability of $19,353 for the year ended December 31, 2002. Key employees made no deferred compensation contributions in 2001. Payments under the salary continuation component plan commence when the respective key employee reaches the age of 62 and the economic value of the coverage allocated to the key employee’s estate is then reported as taxable income to that employee. At December 31, 2002, the cash surrender value of the BOLI was $3,394,999.

NOTE 15 – TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES

Certain directors, executive officers, and principal stockholders are customers of and have had banking transactions with the Bank, and the Bank expects to have such transactions in the future. All loans and commitments to loan included in such transactions were made in compliance with applicable laws on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons and do not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present any other unfavorable features. The amount of loans outstanding to directors, executive officers, principal stockholders, and companies with which they are associated was as follows:

                 
    2002   2001
   
 
BALANCE, beginning of year
  $ 7,107,507     $ 14,580,532  
Loans made
    6,227,476       3,026,052  
Loans repaid
    (2,252,614 )     (10,499,077 )
 
   
     
 
BALANCE, end of year
  $ 11,082,369     $ 7,107,507  
 
   
     
 

NOTE 16 – CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK

All of the Bank’s loans, commitments, and commercial and standby letters of credit have been granted to customers in the Bank’s market areas. The majority of such customers are also depositors of the Bank. Investments in state and municipal securities are not significantly concentrated within any one region of the United States. The concentrations of credit by type of loan are set forth in Note 4. The distribution of commitments to extend credit approximates the distribution of loans outstanding. Commercial and standby letters of credit were granted primarily to commercial borrowers as of December 31, 2002. The Bank’s loan policies do not allow the extension of credit to any single borrower or group of related borrowers in excess of $1,200,000 without approval from the Bank’s loan committee.

27


Table of Contents

NOTE 17 – FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK

In the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers, the Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and the issuance of letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The contract amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Bank has in particular classes of financial instruments.

The Bank’s exposure to credit loss, in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and letters of credit written, is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.

The Bank may or may not require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with credit risk, depending on its loan underwriting guidelines.

                   
      Contract Amounts
      December 31,
     
      2002   2001
     
 
Financial instruments whose contract amounts contains credit risk:
               
 
Commitments to extend credit
  $ 148,938,344     $ 119,550,597  
 
Undisbursed credit card lines of credit
    15,219,916       12,489,221  
 
Commercial and standby letters of credit
    2,654,194       1,866,093  
 
   
     
 
 
  $ 166,812,454     $ 133,905,911  
 
   
     
 

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Bank upon an extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property and equipment, and income-producing properties.

28


Table of Contents

NOTE 17 – FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK– (continued)

Letters of credit written are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Bank holds cash, marketable securities, or real estate as collateral supporting those commitments for which collateral is deemed necessary.

NOTE 18 – RISK MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES

In order to mitigate the risk that a change in interest rates will result in a decline in the value of the Mortgage Group’s committed loan pipeline and adversely impact revenues, the Bank enters into derivative financial instruments. Due to the variability of closings in the Bank’s committed loan pipeline, which is influenced primarily by its mortgage loan customers, Bank policy requires a hedge with forward contracts for the sale of mortgage-backed securities or purchase or sale option contracts, designated as fair value hedges, when the committed fixed-rate conforming pipeline loans aggregate certain dollar thresholds. A forward sales contract protects the Bank in a rising interest rate environment, since the sales price and delivery date are already established. A forward sales contract is different, however, from an option contract in that the Bank is obligated to deliver the loan to the third party on the agreed-upon future date. Consequently, if the loan does not fund, the Bank may not have the necessary assets to meet the commitment and may be required to purchase other assets, at current market prices, to satisfy the forward sales contract. To mitigate this risk, the Bank anticipates the factors that influence pipeline fallout, which represent the percentage of loans that are not expected to close, in calculating the amount of derivative instruments to execute.

As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, forward sales and option contracts to sell mortgage-backed securities were $27,000,000 and $19,000,000, respectively, in maturities of up to two months. Derivative instruments as of December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, had an unrealized loss of $322,248, an unrealized gain of $120,969, and an unrealized loss of $14,844, respectively, each recognized in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. The mortgage-backed securities that are to be delivered under these contracts are fixed-rate and generally correspond with the composition of the Bank’s committed loan pipeline. Changes in the fair value of the mortgage loan commitments and forward sales contracts are recognized in “Mortgage Group revenues, net of expenses” in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.

In a falling interest rate environment, the Bank expects to recognize a loss on the derivative instrument and a gain on the sale of funded loans from the committed loan pipeline. The “effectiveness” of the Bank’s hedging activities is measured by assessing the net losses and gains on derivative instruments realized, unrealized premiums and discounts on loan sales, and yield spread premium payments on mortgage loans sold.

29


Table of Contents

NOTE 18 – RISK MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES – (continued)

The hedge ineffectiveness aggregated to losses of $366,767, $1,483,479, and $3,025 for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002. In 2002 and 2001, particularly, hedge ineffectiveness resulted from the Bank’s decision to subsidize loan pricing in order to increase its mortgage servicing asset volume. The ineffectiveness from hedging activities, along with the servicing retained premiums, servicing release premiums, servicing income, and other servicing expenses, are included in “Mortgage Group revenues, net of expenses” in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.

As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Bank had short-term rate and point commitments amounting to $26,956,841 and $14,739,437, respectively, to fund fixed-rate mortgage loan applications in process. Substantially all of these commitments are for periods of 60 days or less. After funding and sale of the mortgage loans, the Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the mortgagor is limited. The Bank has potential exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to the various forward sales. The Bank manages this credit risk by selecting only well established, financially strong counterparties.

NOTE 19 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating lease commitments – As of December 31, 2002, Columbia leased certain properties. Future minimum lease commitments are as follows:

                 
Years ending December 31,
    2003     $ 253,000  
 
    2004       256,000  
 
    2005       254,000  
 
    2006       215,000  
 
    2007       217,000  
 
  Thereafter     957,000  
 
           
 
 
          $ 2,152,000  
 
           
 

Rental expense for all operating leases was $249,315, $166,189, and $95,571 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively.

Legal contingencies – Columbia may become a defendant in certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, there are no matters presently known to Columbia that are expected to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of Columbia.

30


Table of Contents

NOTE 20 – PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Condensed financial information for Columbia Bancorp (unconsolidated parent company only) is as follows:

                     
        December 31,
       
        2002   2001
       
 
ASSETS
               
 
Cash
  $ 863,808     $ 349,900  
 
Investment security held-to-maturity
    81,579        
 
Corporate equity securities
    112,987       300,000  
 
Investment in subsidiary Bank
    53,254,732       46,210,486  
 
Investment in Columbia Bancorp Trust I
    124,000        
 
Deferred tax asset
    122,704       215,611  
 
Other assets
    677,409       126,586  
 
 
   
     
 
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 55,237,219     $ 47,202,583  
 
 
   
     
 
LIABILITIES
               
 
Junior Subordinated Debentures
  $ 4,124,000     $  
 
Dividend payable
    628,990       642,858  
 
Deferred compensation plan liability
    143,496       104,523  
 
Employee benefit withholding
    143,800        
 
Other payables
    6,552       10,270  
 
 
   
     
 
   
Total liabilities
    5,046,838       757,651  
 
 
   
     
 
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
 
Common stock
    15,096,638       14,679,226  
 
Additional paid-in capital
    2,745,062       6,054,368  
 
Retained earnings
    32,174,431       25,373,550  
 
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale investment securities, net of tax
    174,250       337,788  
 
 
   
     
 
   
Total stockholders’ equity
    50,190,381       46,444,932  
 
 
   
     
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
  $ 55,237,219     $ 47,202,583  
 
 
   
     
 

31


Table of Contents

NOTE 20 – PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION – (continued)

                               
          Years Ended December 31,
         
          2002   2001   2000
         
 
 
REVENUES
                       
 
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary bank
  $ 7,208,039     $ 4,592,787     $ 3,301,266  
 
Dividends
    2,500,000       3,150,000       2,750,000  
 
Other
    314,403             (991 )
EXPENSES
                       
 
Administrative and other expenses
    (641,337 )     (369,070 )     (426,240 )
 
 
   
     
     
 
     
Net income
  $ 9,381,105     $ 7,373,717     $ 5,624,035  
 
 
   
     
     
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
                       
 
Net income
  $ 9,381,105     $ 7,373,717     $ 5,624,035  
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
                       
   
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary bank
    (7,208,039 )     (4,592,787 )     (3,301,266 )
   
Changes in other assets and liabilities
    30,607       (272,887 )     144,363  
 
 
   
     
     
 
     
Net cash from operating activities
    2,203,673       2,508,043       2,467,132  
 
 
   
     
     
 

32


Table of Contents

NOTE 20 – PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION – (continued)

                             
        Years Ended December 31,
       
        2002   2001   2000
       
 
 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
                       
 
Investment in Columbia Bancorp Trust I
    (124,000 )            
 
Purchase of held-to-maturity security
    (81,579 )            
 
 
   
     
     
 
   
Net cash from investing activities
    (205,579 )            
 
 
   
     
     
 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
                       
 
Dividends paid
    (2,593,588 )     (2,569,581 )     (2,244,637 )
 
Repurchase of common stock
    (4,023,170 )     (427,503 )      
 
Proceeds from issuance of Junior Subordinated Debentures
    4,124,000              
 
Proceeds from stock options exercised
    1,008,572       307,455       69,542  
 
 
   
     
     
 
   
Net cash from financing activities
    (1,484,186 )     (2,689,629 )     (2,175,095 )
 
 
   
     
     
 
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
    513,908       (181,586 )     292,037  
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year
    349,900       531,486       239,449  
 
 
   
     
     
 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year
  $ 863,808     $ 349,900     $ 531,486  
 
 
   
     
     
 
SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
                       
 
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax
  $ (163,538 )   $ 422,705     $ 629,377  
 
 
   
     
     
 
 
Cash dividend payable
  $ 628,990     $ 642,858     $ 642,354  
 
 
   
     
     
 

33


Table of Contents

NOTE 21 – REGULATORY MATTERS

Columbia and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal and state banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum requirements can initiate certain mandatory – and possibly additional discretionary – actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on a bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, banks must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require Columbia and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2002, that Columbia and the Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

As of the most recent notifications from their regulatory agencies, Columbia and the Bank were categorized as well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as adequately capitalized, Columbia and the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital, and Tier 1 leverage capital ratios as set forth in the table below. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes may have changed the institutions’ category.

                                                   
                                      To Be Well-
                                      Capitalized Under
                      For Capital   Prompt Corrective
      Actual   Adequacy Purposes   Action Provisions
     
 
 
As of December 31, 2002   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio
(dollars in thousands)  
 
 
 
 
 
Total capital to risk-weighted assets:
                                               
 
Columbia Bancorp
  $ 52,116       11.0 %   $ 38,041       ³8 %            
 
Columbia River Bank
  $ 51,168       10.8 %   $ 37,996       ³8 %   $ 47,458       ³10 %
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets:
                                               
 
Columbia Bancorp
  $ 46,166       9.7 %   $ 19,020       ³4 %            
 
Columbia River Bank
  $ 45,230       9.5 %   $ 18,983       >4 %   $ 28,475       ³6 %
Tier 1 capital to average assets:
                                               
 
Columbia Bancorp
  $ 46,166       8.6 %   $ 21,558       ³4 %            
 
Columbia River Bank
  $ 45,230       8.4 %   $ 21,518       ³4 %   $ 26,898       ³5 %

34


Table of Contents

NOTE 21 – REGULATORY MATTERS – (continued)

                                                   
                                      To Be Well-
                                      Capitalized Under
                      For Capital   Prompt Corrective
      Actual   Adequacy Purposes   Action Provisions
     
 
 
As of December 31, 2001   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio
(dollars in thousands)  
 
 
 
 
 
Total capital to risk-weighted assets:
                                               
 
Columbia Bancorp
  $ 43,181       10.6 %   $ 32,568       ³8 %            
 
Columbia River Bank
  $ 42,946       10.6 %   $ 32,517       ³8 %   $ 40,647       ³10 %
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets:
                                               
 
Columbia Bancorp
  $ 38,097       9.4 %   $ 16,284       ³4 %            
 
Columbia River Bank
  $ 37,862       9.3 %   $ 16,259       ³4 %   $ 24,388       ³6 %
Tier 1 capital to average assets:
                                               
 
Columbia Bancorp
  $ 38,097       8.6 %   $ 17,690       ³4 %            
 
Columbia River Bank
  $ 37,862       8.0 %   $ 18,948       ³4 %   $ 23,685       ³5 %

35


Table of Contents

NOTE 22 – FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The following table estimates fair values and the related carrying values of Columbia’s financial instruments (in thousands):

                                   
      2002   2001
     
 
              Estimated           Estimated
      Carrying   Fair   Carrying   Fair
      Amount   Value   Amount   Value
     
 
 
 
Financial assets:
                               
 
Cash and due from banks
  $ 28,414     $ 28,414     $ 19,813     $ 19,813  
 
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks
  $ 8,552     $ 8,552     $ 1,275     $ 1,275  
 
Federal funds sold
  $ 3,735     $ 3,735     $ 1,525     $ 1,525  
 
Investment securities available-for-sale
  $ 14,750     $ 14,750     $ 18,802     $ 18,802  
 
Investment securities held-to-maturity
  $ 18,600     $ 19,439     $ 22,657     $ 22,844  
 
Restricted equity securities
  $ 2,698     $ 2,698     $ 2,072     $ 2,072  
 
Loans held-for-sale
  $ 8,770     $ 8,770     $ 18,960     $ 18,960  
 
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses and unearned loan fees
  $ 423,918     $ 426,286     $ 361,323     $ 375,036  
 
Accrued interest receivable
  $ 3,895     $ 3,895     $ 3,486     $ 3,486  
 
Mortgage servicing asset
  $ 4,614     $ 4,614     $ 6,197     $ 6,197  
Financial liabilities:
                               
 
Demand and savings deposits
  $ 344,323     $ 344,323     $ 277,727     $ 277,727  
 
Time certificates
  $ 111,512     $ 113,642     $ 116,909     $ 119,254  
 
Notes payable
  $ 27,135     $ 27,135     $ 35,905     $ 35,905  
 
Accrued interest payable
  $ 7,166     $ 7,166     $ 5,221     $ 5,221  
 
Junior Subordinated Debentures
  $ 4,000     $ 4,000     $     $  

While estimates of fair value are based on management’s judgment of the most appropriate factors, there is no assurance that were Columbia to dispose of such items at December 31, 2002 and 2001, the estimated fair values would necessarily be achieved at that date, since market values may differ depending on various circumstances. The estimated fair values at December 31, 2002 and 2001, should not necessarily be relied upon at subsequent dates.

In addition, other assets and liabilities of Columbia that are not defined as financial instruments are not included in the above disclosures, such as property and equipment. Also, nonfinancial instruments typically not recognized in the consolidated financial statements nevertheless may have value but are not included in the above disclosures. These include, among other items, the estimated earnings power of core deposit accounts, the earnings potential of loan servicing rights, the trained work force, customer goodwill, and similar items.

36


Table of Contents

NOTE 23 – SEGMENT INFORMATION

Columbia operates two primary segments, the community banking segment and the mortgage banking segment. The community banking segment consists of Columbia’s subsidiary, Columbia River Bank, which operates 12 full-service bank branches and three limited banking facilities in Oregon and two branches in Washington. The Bank offers loan, investment, and deposit products to its customers who range from individuals to medium-size agricultural and commercial companies. The mortgage banking segment consists of Columbia Mortgage Group, with administrative offices in Bend, Oregon, and an additional eight offices in Oregon. Columbia Mortgage Group offers a full range of mortgage lending services and products to its clients.

In 2002, management evaluated the internal controls and accounting processes of the Mortgage Group. As a result of this evaluation, certain activities were reclassified for internal financial statement purposes, thus affecting account level detail of the internal segment reporting process. Due to the overall volume and nature of transactions that impact secondary marketing activities, management determined it to be impracticable and of minimal benefit to restate prior periods for these account reclassification changes. The overall performance of the Bank and the overall composition of the reportable segments remain unchanged as a result of these internal segment reporting process changes.

Financial information that Columbia’s management uses to evaluate the reportable segments and the reconciliation to Columbia’s consolidated results are summarized as follows:

                         
    Community   Mortgage        
    Banking   Banking   Consolidated
   
 
 
December 31, 2002
                       
Net interest income before provision for loan losses
  $ 29,417,087     $ 416,835     $ 29,833,922  
Noninterest income
  $ 2,780,198     $ 5,770,949     $ 8,551,147  
Depreciation and amortization
  $ 1,141,368     $ 97,471     $ 1,238,839  
Mortgage servicing asset amortization
  $     $ 1,028,810     $ 1,028,810  
Impairment of mortgage servicing rights
  $     $ 2,781,111     $ 2,781,111  
Income before provision for income taxes
  $ 15,883,083     $ (1,278,481 )   $ 14,604,602  
Goodwill
  $ 7,389,094     $     $ 7,389,094  
Total assets
  $ 526,201,665     $ 18,124,319     $ 544,325,984  

37


Table of Contents

NOTE 23 – SEGMENT INFORMATION – (continued)

                         
    Community   Mortgage        
    Banking   Banking   Consolidated
   
 
 
December 31, 2001
                       
Net interest income before provision for loan losses
  $ 22,639,245     $ 855,905     $ 23,495,150  
Noninterest income
  $ 3,557,900     $ 5,635,927     $ 9,193,827  
Depreciation and amortization
  $ 1,694,496     $ 73,503     $ 1,767,999  
Mortgage servicing asset amortization
  $     $ 395,354     $ 395,354  
Impairment of mortgage servicing rights
  $     $ 917,729     $ 917,729  
Income before provision for income taxes
  $ 9,949,154     $ 1,801,375     $ 11,750,529  
Goodwill
  $ 7,389,094     $     $ 7,389,094  
Total assets
  $ 452,259,905     $ 29,946,800     $ 482,206,705  
December 31, 2000
                       
Net interest income before provision for loan losses
  $ 20,673,346     $ 437,435     $ 21,110,781  
Noninterest income
  $ 4,085,245     $ 2,265,288     $ 6,350,533  
Depreciation and amortization
  $ 1,559,997     $ 60,455     $ 1,620,452  
Mortgage servicing asset amortization
  $     $ 159,832     $ 159,832  
Income before provision for income taxes
  $ 8,068,615     $ 860,417     $ 8,929,032  
Goodwill
  $ 8,017,717     $     $ 8,017,717  
Total assets
  $ 401,089,595     $ 15,769,420     $ 416,859,015  

    The mortgage banking segment receives an intercompany cost-of-funds allocation, based on the average outstanding balance of the mortgage banking loans. This allocation is eliminated in consolidation; however, it appears as interest income for the community banking segment and interest expense in the mortgage banking segment in the tables above. For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, the allocation was approximately $950,000, $882,000, and $345,000, respectively.

     
ITEM #9   CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

     There were no changes in or disagreements with accountants regarding accounting and financial disclosure matters during the year ended December 31, 2001.

38


Table of Contents

PART III

     
ITEM #10   DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

     The information called for by this item is contained in Columbia’s definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 24, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference.

     
ITEM #11   EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND REPORT OF COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

     The information called for by this item is contained in Columbia’s definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 24, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference.

     
ITEM #12   SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

     The information called for by this item is contained in Columbia’s definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 24, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference.

     
ITEM #13   CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

     The information called for by this item is contained in Columbia’s definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 24, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference.

     
ITEM #14   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

     Within 90 days prior to the date of this report, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Our principal executive and financial officers supervised and participated in this evaluation. Based upon this evaluation our principal executive and financial officers each concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in our periodic SEC reports. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon various assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any of our plans, products or procedures will succeed in achieving their intended goals under future conditions. In addition, there have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect our internal controls subsequent to our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses.

Part IV

     
ITEM #15   EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)  Exhibits.

The following documents are filed as part of this report and are incorporated herein by reference from the Registrant’s 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders, and are being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of Columbia Bancorp’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Independent Auditors Report.

Consolidated Balance Sheets for the Years Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001.

Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000.

39


Table of Contents

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(b)  Reports filed on Form 8-K.

Dated November 21, 2002, filed with the SEC on November 22, 2002, containing Items 5 and 7.

The following documents are not included in this 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders, but are either being filed with, or incorporated by reference into, Columbia Bancorp’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     
3.1   Articles of Incorporation of Columbia Bancorp (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(i) to Columbia’s form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1999.)
     
3.2   Bylaws of Columbia Bancorp (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 15.5 to Columbia’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1998.)
     
10.1   Employment Agreement of January 25, 2001 between Roger Christensen and Columbia Bancorp. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Columbia’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.)
     
10.1(a)   Amendment to Employment Agreement of January 25, 2001 between Roger Christensen and Columbia Bancorp. (Amendment date April 15, 2002.)*
     
10.2   Employment Agreement of June 15, 2001 between Greg Spear and Columbia Bancorp. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Columbia’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.)
     
10.3   Employment Agreement of April 1, 2000 between James McCall and Columbia River Bank. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Columbia’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.)
     
10.3(a)   Amendment to Employment Agreement of April 1, 2000 between James McCall and Columbia River Bank. (Amendment date August 1, 2001.)*
     
10.4   Employment Agreement of April 1, 2000 between Craig Ortega and Columbia River Bank. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Columbia’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.)
     
10.4(a)   Amendment to Employment Agreement of April 1, 2000 between Craig Ortega and Columbia River Bank. (Amendment date August 1, 2001.)*
     
10.5   Deferred Compensation Agreement of April 1, 1999 between Terry L. Cochran and Columbia Bancorp. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Columbia’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.)
     
10.6   Columbia Bancorp Restated Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement (1999 Restatement). (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Columbia’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.)
     
10.7   Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Roger L. Christensen. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Columbia’s Periodic Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002.)

40


Table of Contents

     
10.8   Executive Bonus Deferral Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Roger L. Christensen. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Columbia’s Periodic Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002.)
     
10.9   Split Dollar Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Roger L. Christensen. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Columbia’s Periodic Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 20, 2002.)
     
10.10   Phantom Stock Agreement between Columbia Bancorp and Roger L. Christensen. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Columbia’s Periodic Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002.
     
10.11   Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between Columbia River Bank and James C. McCall.*
     
10.12   Executive Bonus Deferral Agreement between Columbia River Bank and James C. McCall.*
     
10.13   Split Dollar Agreement between Columbia River Bank and James C. McCall.*
     
10.14   Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Craig J. Ortega.*
     
10.15   Executive Bonus Deferral Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Craig J. Ortega.*
     
10.16   Split Dollar Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Craig J. Ortega.*
     
10.17   Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Britt W. Thomas.*
     
10.18   Executive Bonus Deferral Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Britt W. Thomas.*
     
10.19   Split Dollar Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Britt W. Thomas.*
     
10.20   Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Greg B. Spear.*
     
10.21   Executive Bonus Deferral Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Greg B. Spear.*
     
10.22   Split Dollar Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Greg B. Spear.*
     
13.1   Annual Report to Shareholders for the Year Ended December 31, 2002.*
     
21.1   List of Subsidiaries.*
     
99.1   Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
     
99.2   Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

Asterisk Language is:

*Included as an exhibit to Columbia Bancorp’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Availability of Exhibits and Form 10-K

The exhibits listed in Section © above have been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of annual or quarterly reports required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Copies of such exhibits are available from Columbia Bancorp at a charge of $.25 per page, Columbia Bancorp’s reasonable expense for copying and mailing such materials, upon written request. Please direct such requestes to: Columbia Bancorp, Investor Relations, PO Box 1050, The Dalles, Oregon 97058. Columbia Bancorp’s filings under the Exchange Act, including exhibits, may also be accessed over the Internet through the website maintained by the Securities and

41


Table of Contents

Exchange Commission at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, a full copy (without Section © exhibits) of Columbia Bancorp’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is available free of charge upon written request to Columbia Bancorp.

42


Table of Contents

CERTIFICATION

I, Roger L. Christensen, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Columbia Bancorp;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: February 24, 2003


Roger L. Christensen
President and Chief Executive Officer

43


Table of Contents

CERTIFICATION

I, Greg B. Spear, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Columbia Bancorp;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: February 24, 2003


Greg B. Spear,
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer

44


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

     In accordance with Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

COLUMBIA BANCORP

             
DATED:   February 24, 2003   By:   Roger L. Christensen, President & C.E.O. – Columbia and CRB

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR

             
DATED:   February 24, 2003   By:   Roger L. Christensen, President & C.E.O – Columbia and CRB

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

             
DATED:   February 24, 2003   By   Greg B. Spear, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer – Columbia and CRB

DIRECTORS:

             
DATED:   February 24, 2003   By:   Donald T. Mitchell, Director and Chairman
 
DATED:   February 24, 2003   By   Robert L. R. Bailey, Director
 
DATED:   February 24, 2003   By   Charles F. Beardsley, Director
DATED:   February 24, 2003   By   Richard E. Betz, Director
DATED:   February 24, 2003   By   William A. Booth, Director
 
DATED:   February 24, 2003   By   Dennis L. Carver, Director
 
DATED:   February 24, 2003   By   Terry, L. Cochran, Director
DATED:   February 24, 2003   By   James J. Doran, Director
DATED:   February 24, 2003   By   Jane F. Lee, Director
DATED:   February 24, 2003   By   Jean S. McKinney, Director

EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiaries of Columbia

Columbia Bancorp’s only wholly-owned subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 were Columbia River Bank and Columbia Bancorp Trust.

45