Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Form 10-K

Commission file number 1-10239

Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc.

999 Third Avenue, Suite 2300

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $.01 per share.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes þ         No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).         Yes þ         No o

The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates based on the closing sales price on June 28, 2002 was $6,038,318,776. For this calculation, all executive officers, directors and stockholders owning more than 5% of the outstanding common stock have been deemed affiliates. Such determination should not be deemed an admission that such executive officers, directors and stockholders are, in fact, affiliates of the registrant.

The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock as of February 28, 2003 was 183,568,062.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated:

Portions of the Proxy Statement for registrant’s 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 6, 2003, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

Part I

When we refer to “we”, “us”, “our”, “the company” or “Plum Creek” we mean Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries and its predecessor, Plum Creek Timber Company, L.P.

On October 6, 2001, we merged with The Timber Company, formerly a separate operating division of Georgia-Pacific Corporation. This merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition. Accordingly, the historical financial statements of The Timber Company became our historical financial statements for accounting and financial reporting purposes.

Item 1. Business

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

The company’s Internet web site is accessible to the public at www.plumcreek.com. Information about the company, including the company’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports are made available free of charge through our Internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports have been filed with, or furnished to, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

INDUSTRY OVERVIEW

General

The timber industry provides raw material and conducts resource management activities for the paper and forest products industry, including the planting, fertilizing, thinning, and cutting of trees and the marketing of logs. Logs are marketed and sold either as sawlogs to lumber and other wood products manufacturers or as pulplogs to pulp and paper manufacturers. The timber industry possesses several unique characteristics that distinguish it from the broader paper and forest products industry, which we believe makes timber an attractive asset class, including the following:

Renewable Resource. Timber is a growing and renewable resource that, when properly managed, increases in volume and value as it grows over time. Larger diameter trees command a higher price than smaller trees because they may be converted to higher value end-use products such as lumber and plywood.

Predictable and Improving Growth Rates. Predictable biological growth is an attractive feature of timberland assets because it contributes to predictable, long-term harvest planning. The development and application of intensive forest management practices continue to improve biological growth rates.

Harvest Flexibility. Timberland owners have some flexibility to increase their harvests when prices are high and decrease their harvests when prices are low, allowing timberland owners to maximize the long-term value of their growing resource base.

Historical Real Price Appreciation. Due to growing demand combined with limitations on supply caused by environmental restrictions, urban sprawl and overcutting, prices for Douglas-fir and Southern Yellow Pine timber have exhibited a compound annual growth rate of approximately 4% and 3% from 1975 through 2002.

Supply and Demand Dynamics

There are five primary end-markets for most of the timber harvested in the United States: products used in new housing construction; products used in the repair and remodeling of existing housing; products for industrial uses; raw material for the manufacture of pulp and paper; and logs for export.

Supply. Timber supply can fluctuate based upon a variety of factors.

The supply of timber is limited, to some extent, by the availability of timberlands. The availability of timberlands, in turn, is limited by several factors, including government restrictions relating to environmental regulation and land use, alternate uses such as agriculture, and loss to urban or suburban real estate development. The large amounts of capital and long time required to create new timberlands also limits timber supply.

Table of Contents

Over the long-term, timber supply increases when modern forestry techniques increase productivity of timberlands and when some marginal agriculture lands revert to timberlands or are planted to forests for conservation purposes. In certain regional markets, log supply can expand when log imports increase relative to log exports.

Demand. The demand for timber is directly related to the underlying demand for pulp and paper products, lumber, panel and other wood related products. The demand for pulp and paper is largely driven by population growth and per-capita income levels. The demand for lumber and manufactured wood products is primarily affected by the level of new residential construction activity and repair and remodeling activity, which, in turn, is impacted by changes in general economic and demographic factors, including interest rates for home mortgages and construction loans. The demand for United States timber is impacted by the amounts of lumber and other wood products that are imported into the United States. A significant factor determining the volume of wood products shipped into the United States by foreign producers is currency valuation shifts.

OUR BUSINESS

We are the second largest private timberland owner in the United States, with more than 8.0 million acres of timberlands located in 20 states. Our timberlands are well diversified, not only by species mix but also by age distribution. Growth rates vary depending on species, location, age and forestry practices. We manage our timberlands in two business segments: the Northern Resources Segment, consisting of timberlands primarily in Idaho, Maine, Michigan, Montana, Oregon, Pennsylvania, western Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin; and the Southern Resources Segment, consisting of timberlands primarily in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas and eastern Virginia. In addition, our Other Segment includes our natural resource businesses that focus on opportunities resulting from our extensive property ownership including opportunities relating to mineral extraction, natural gas production and communication and transportation rights of way. The Real Estate Segment, which is generally conducted through our taxable REIT subsidiaries, refers to our sale and management of higher and better use lands and periodic sales of non-strategic timberlands.

Our Manufactured Products Segment, also conducted through our taxable REIT subsidiaries, includes four lumber mills, two plywood plants, two medium density fiberboard facilities, and two lumber remanufacturing facilities. These facilities, strategically located near our timberlands in Montana and Idaho, convert logs to lumber, plywood and other wood products, and convert chips, sawdust and wood shavings to medium density fiberboard. The manufacturing operations have established a network of 65 independent warehouses located strategically throughout the United States to enhance customer service and prompt deliveries.

Our Value Growth Strategy

Our value growth strategy is guided by specific operating objectives, including maximizing the value of our current timberlands through intensive forest management and optimizing our resource base through acquisitions and divestitures, and practicing environmentally responsible resource stewardship. Our value growth strategy includes the following key elements:

Focus on Maximizing the Value of Our Resource Base Through Intensive Management of our Timberlands. We view our timber resource base as a renewable asset with substantial inherent value. We seek to manage our timberlands in a manner that optimizes the balance among current cash flows, the biological growth of our timber and prudent environmental management. Our management approach employs advanced forest management practices, including the use of a computerized timber inventory system, thinning and fertilization, and the development and use of genetically improved seedlings. Tree growth rates vary from region to region because of differences in weather, climate and soil conditions. Newly-planted seedlings take 20 to 30 years to reach harvest maturity in the Southern United States, 45 to 60 years in the Northwestern United States, 45 to 70 years in the Northeastern United States and 70 to 90 years in the Rocky Mountains, depending on the desired product.

Pursue Acquisitions of High Quality Timber Assets. The United States timber market is highly fragmented. We believe that there will continue to be numerous timberland acquisition opportunities due to the desire among some

Table of Contents

•	We are an attractive strategic partner for integrated forest products companies seeking to sell their timberlands because we do not compete with their pulp or paper manufacturing operations and we are willing to enter into long-term supply agreements;
•	We can structure acquisitions on a tax-efficient basis through the issuance of common stock, limited partnership interests in our operating partnership, or installment notes, giving sellers the ability to defer some or all of the taxes otherwise payable upon a sale; see Risk Factors— We Will Have to Abide by Potentially Significant Restrictions With Respect to Issuances of Our Equity Securities Until October, 2003;
•	The geographic reach of our operations enhances our awareness of new acquisition opportunities and our knowledge of environmental concerns, market dynamics, timber productivity and other factors important in valuing timberlands and operations in each region;
•	Our reputation for prudent environmental management makes us attractive to sellers concerned with continued environmentally responsible forest management; and
•	We maintain a conservative capital structure which provides the flexibility to ensure ready access to capital.

Our disciplined acquisition strategy has allowed us to expand and diversify our timber holdings, as well as increase our cash flow. Over the last decade, we have increased our timber holdings from approximately 1.4 million acres to approximately 8.0 million acres. These acquisitions have enhanced our operating flexibility and reduced our exposure to regional timber market fluctuations. Our strategy is to continue to make strategic acquisitions that are accretive to cash flow.

Realize the Value of Selected Properties Through Sale or Exchange. At the same time that we pursue timberland acquisitions, we continually review our timberland portfolio to identify properties that may have higher and better uses other than as commercial timberlands. At this time, we estimate that approximately 400,000 acres of the company’s approximately 8 million acres of timberlands are located in recreational areas or near expanding population centers and may be better suited for conservation, residential or recreational purposes, rather than for long-term commercial timberland management. Furthermore, the company estimates that an additional 900,000 acres may also be suited for conservation, residential or recreational development. Our ongoing review process evaluates properties based on a number of factors such as proximity to population centers and major transportation routes, and the presence of special ecological or geographic features.

We may sell or exchange timberlands which have high environmental or other public values and reinvest in timberlands that are more suitable for commercial timber management. In addition, we may sell conservation easements that limit development rights, but ensure that the timberlands will be maintained as a working forest in perpetuity. We may also sell or exchange less strategic timberlands to other forest products companies or non-industrial investors. Additionally, from time to time, we may pursue pre-development or development activities on certain lands.

Capture the Value of Non-timber Resources on Our Properties. As part of our resources business, we focus on value creation resulting from our extensive property ownership, including opportunities relating to mineral extraction and communication and transportation rights of way. Our strategy involves forming strategic alliances with industry specific leaders to identify and pursue such opportunities, as well as securing participation rights in any resulting development projects.

Practice Responsible Environmental Forestry. We believe that environmentally sound management practices contribute to our growth in value by providing greater predictability in the management of our assets. Our forestry and mill practices follow a set of internal environmental principles as well as principles of the Sustainable Forestry Initiative® which are aimed at the sound management of all natural resources, including soils, air, watersheds, fisheries and wildlife habitats. These principles are reflected in our habitat planning efforts, which have led to the

Table of Contents

Acquisitions and Dispositions

During the fourth quarter of 2002, we acquired 307,000 acres of timberlands located primarily in Wisconsin for approximately $141 million. These timberlands contain a diversified mix of tree types and age profiles, including mature mixed hardwood stands, mixed natural conifer stands, and hardwood and conifer plantations.

On October 6, 2001, six former subsidiaries of Georgia-Pacific Corporation, collectively referred to as “The Timber Company”, merged with and into Plum Creek (“The Timber Company Merger”). The Timber Company held all of the assets and liabilities attributed to Georgia-Pacific’s timber and timberlands business. In the merger, we acquired approximately 3.9 million acres of primarily pine forests in the southern regions of the United States, 287,000 acres of primarily Douglas-fir forests in Oregon and 542,000 acres of mixed hardwood forests in the Appalachian and northeastern regions of the United States for a purchase price of approximately $3.4 billion. The purchase price amount includes debt incurred by the company sufficient to replace the debt attributed to The Timber Company, which was approximately $650 million as of October 6, 2001. The merger with The Timber Company has been accounted for as a reverse acquisition, with The Timber Company being treated as the acquirer for financial reporting purposes. As a result, the historical financial statements of The Timber Company constitute the historical financial statements of Plum Creek effective as of October 6, 2001. Consequently, our financial statements for 2002 reflect a full year of combined operations of the merged companies whereas the 2001 financial statements reflect only the operations of The Timber Company through October 6, 2001 and of the merged companies for the remainder of the year. The 2000 financial statements represent only the historical financial statement of The Timber Company.

Prior to the merger with The Timber Company, Plum Creek disposed of certain of its timberlands. These dispositions are not reflected in the company’s historical financial statements because the merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition and the historical financial statements of The Timber Company became the historical financial statements of Plum Creek effective as of October 6, 2001.

On March 29, 2001, Plum Creek sold approximately 44,000 acres of timberlands near Kelso, Washington to Pope Resources, a Delaware Limited Partnership, for approximately $54 million.

On December 15, 2000, Plum Creek sold its Southern lumber manufacturing operations in Joyce, Louisiana and Huttig, Arkansas to West Fraser (South) Inc. for $60 million plus working capital. In January 2000, Plum Creek sold approximately 90,000 acres of timberlands near St. Maries, Idaho to Crown Pacific Partners, L.P. for approximately $73 million.

During 1999, The Timber Company sold approximately 1,024,000 acres of timberlands for $442 million in three separate transactions. These transactions included 390,000 acres of timberlands in the Canadian province of New Brunswick, 440,000 acres of timberlands in Maine, and 194,000 acres of timberlands in California.

On July 1, 1999, Plum Creek Timber Company, L.P. converted from a master limited partnership to a corporation. Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc., the new corporation and successor registrant, has elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a real estate investment trust or “REIT”. As of the date of the REIT conversion, Plum Creek Timber Company, L.P. ceased to exist. To qualify as a REIT, substantially all assets and associated liabilities related to our manufacturing operations and harvesting activities, and some higher and better use lands, were transferred to several unconsolidated corporate subsidiaries. In late 1999, Congress simplified several of the qualification requirements applicable to REITs, including the circumstances under which a REIT may own the voting stock of entities that do not generate qualified REIT income. Accordingly, on January 1, 2001, Plum Creek purchased the voting stock of the unconsolidated subsidiaries and thereby consolidated the equity ownership in these business entities.

On November 12, 1998, Plum Creek acquired 905,000 acres of timberlands in central Maine from S.D. Warren Company for a purchase price of $181 million, plus $300,000 for working capital.

Table of Contents

During 1998, The Timber Company sold approximately 61,000 acres of timberlands in West Virginia for approximately $26 million.

SEGMENT INFORMATION

Certain financial information for each business segment is included in Note 14 of the Notes to Financial Statements and is incorporated herein by reference.

Northern Resources Segment

The Northern Resources Segment encompasses 3.7 million acres of timberlands in Idaho, Maine, Michigan, Montana, Oregon, Pennsylvania, western Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin. The Northern Resources Segment timberlands contain an estimated 130 million tons (43 million cunits) of standing timber. Consistent with industry practices in the North, Plum Creek’s estimated inventory of standing timber includes deductions for visible and hidden defect. Furthermore, Plum Creek’s estimated inventory includes volumes in environmentally sensitive areas, where we defer harvest until conditions permit the removal of trees without adversely affecting the environment.

Logs harvested in the Northern Resources Segment are sold primarily to domestic mills and for export to Canada. The company also exports a few logs to the Pacific Rim countries. Competitors in the domestic log market include the United States Forest Service, the Bureau of Land Management, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the British Columbia Ministry of Forests, and numerous private individuals, domestic and foreign industrial timberland owners, and state agencies located in the regions in which we operate. Competitors in export log markets include numerous private timberland owners in the United States, as well as companies and state-controlled enterprises in Canada, Chile, New Zealand, and Russia, all of which have abundant timber resources. In the Northern Resources Segment, domestic wood and fiber consuming facilities tend to purchase raw materials within a 200-mile radius due to transportation costs. Competitive factors within a market area generally will include price, species and grade, quality, proximity to wood consuming facilities and the ability to consistently meet customer requirements. We compete based on our reputation as a stable and consistent supplier of well-merchandised, high-quality logs, and on price.

In 2002, we entered into a three-year pulp wood fiber supply agreement with Stora Enso North America Corp. in connection with our acquisition of 307,000 acres of timberlands located primarily in Wisconsin. Under the agreement, which expires December 31, 2005, we will supply specified quantities of fiber at prevailing market prices to Stora’s paper mills. In connection with our acquisition of the Maine timberlands in 1998, we entered into a long-term agreement to supply pulp wood fiber to S.D. Warren Company’s paper facility in Skowhegan, Maine at prevailing market prices. The fiber supply agreement ends in 2023 and may be extended up to an additional 15 years at the option of S.D. Warren Company. In conjunction with an acquisition in 1993 of 865,000 acres of timberlands in western Montana, we entered into a sourcing agreement with Stimson Lumber Company to supply logs to Stimson’s Montana mills, based upon prevailing market prices, over a ten-year period ending at December 31, 2003.

Southern Resources Segment

The Southern Resources Segment consists of 4.3 million acres of timberlands (including 350,000 acres of leased land) located in the states of Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas and eastern Virginia, and contains an estimated 164 million tons (46 million cunits) of standing timber. Consistent with industry practices in the South, Plum Creek’s estimated inventory of standing timber includes deductions for visible defect. Furthermore, Plum Creek’s estimated inventory includes volume in environmentally sensitive areas, where we defer harvest until conditions permit the removal of trees without adversely affecting the environment.

Logs in the Southern Resources Segment are sold to third party mills producing a wide array of forest products, including manufacturers of lumber, plywood, oriented strand board, and pulp and paper products. We compete with numerous private and industrial timberland owners, as well as federal and state agencies, across the Southern

Table of Contents

In connection with The Timber Company Merger, our Southern Resources Segment entered into a long-term agreement to sell timber to Georgia-Pacific at prevailing market prices. The supply agreement expires in 2010 subject to an automatic 10-year renewal period, unless either party delivers a timely termination notice. In connection with Plum Creek’s December 2000 sale of its Southern lumber facilities to West Fraser (South) Inc., Plum Creek entered into a long-term agreement to supply logs to these mills at prevailing market prices. The supply agreement expires in 2015 and may be renewed for five-year periods thereafter upon mutual consent of both parties. Additionally, in connection with Plum Creek’s acquisition of 538,000 acres of timberlands in Louisiana and Arkansas from Riverwood International Corporation in 1996, Plum Creek entered into a long-term agreement to supply pulp logs at prices that are based upon prevailing market prices. The supply agreement ends in 2016 and can be extended up to an additional 10 years by either party. We expect that our long-term supply agreements with Georgia-Pacific, Riverwood International Corporation and West Fraser (South) Inc. will provide us with ongoing secure markets for a substantial portion of the wood fiber harvested from our Southern Resources Segment timberlands. The long-term supply agreements may restrict our ability to sell lands in certain areas within our Southern Resources Segment.

Real Estate Segment

We estimate that approximately 400,000 acres of the company’s approximately 8 million acres of timberlands are located in recreational areas or near expanding population centers and may be better suited for conservation, residential or recreational purposes, rather than for long-term commercial timberland management. Furthermore, the company estimates that an additional 900,000 acres may also be suited for conservation, residential or recreational development.

We are sometimes approached by third parties, such as conservation groups or adjacent landowners, and asked to sell a particular timberland property.

From time to time, we transfer land to wholly owned taxable REIT subsidiaries that focus on maximizing the value through various development activities, and then realizing that value through market-timed sales. Our subsidiaries may also pursue various forms of pre-development type activities such as entitlement or zoning to prepare a property for an eventual sale.

We compete with numerous sellers of real estate parcels in hundreds of local markets. Our sales tend to be parcels of 10 acres or more, with numerous transactions in excess of 1,000 acres, and occasional transactions exceeding 10,000 acres.

Manufactured Products Segment

Lumber. We produce a diverse line of softwood lumber products, including common and select boards, studs, edge-glued boards and finger-jointed studs. Lumber products manufactured in our two studmills, two random-length board mills, and remanufacturing facility in western Montana, along with our remanufacturing facility in Idaho, are targeted to domestic lumber retailers, such as retail home centers, for use in repair and remodeling projects. These products are also sold to stocking distributors for use in home construction.

Competition in our lumber markets is based on price and quality and, to a lesser extent, the ability to meet delivery requirements on a consistent long-term basis and to provide specialized customer service. We compete in domestic lumber markets with a host of other United States, Canadian and European producers. Canadian and European lumber producers have increased their penetration into the United States market due to their lower wood fiber costs and favorable exchange rates. The lumber market is also subject to competition from substitute products,

Table of Contents

Our lumber and plywood mills produce residual wood chips, sawdust and planer shavings as by-products of the conversion of raw logs into finished products. The wood chips are sold to regional paper and pulp mills or used in our medium density fiberboard facilities which also consume the sawdust and shavings. A substantial portion of our residual wood chip production is sold to Smurfit Stone Container Corporation under a long-term supply agreement, which expires on February 28, 2006.

Plywood. Our two plywood plants in western Montana produce high-grade softwood plywood that we sell primarily into domestic specialized industrial markets, including boat, recreational vehicle, transportation and fiberglass-reinforced panel manufacturing. Our plywood products are generally of higher quality than commodity construction grade products and generally command higher prices in these specialty markets. We also export 5 to 10% of our plywood to Canada. See— lumber above for a discussion on residual wood chips.

Competition within the plywood market is based primarily on price and quality and, to a lesser extent, the ability to offer a full line of products and meet delivery requirements on a consistent, long-term basis. The domestic plywood market is characterized by numerous large and small producers and is also subject to competition from oriented strand board, a less expensive substitute wood product used primarily in commodity construction markets. Oriented strand board continues to capture an increasing percentage of the structural panel market due to its low cost. Oriented strand board has now captured over 55% of the structural panel market, and this percentage is expected to increase over the next several years as additional oriented strand board plants are built or existing facilities are expanded. To improve operating performance, several commodity plywood manufacturers have refocused their products toward the specialty plywood market, resulting in increased competition in the markets we serve. Recently competition from imported South American plywood has also impacted the high-grade sanded plywood market. We expect to remain competitive due to our strong customer base, extensive experience in industrial markets, supply of superior quality timber, and reputation for high quality products.

Medium Density Fiberboard. October of 2001 marked the start-up of a new $80 million thin-board production facility adjacent to our existing medium density fiberboard facility in western Montana. This new thin-board line, which complements our existing product line, has a capacity of 95 million square feet annually and increases our overall capacity by 70%. During 2002, we moved from start-up phase toward full production and the two lines combined produced approximately 178 million square feet of medium density fiberboard (“MDF”). Once the new line achieves full production capability, we expect to be able to annually produce up to 230 million square feet of MDF. We supply high quality MDF to a wide range of customers throughout North America. Some of the more common uses for our MDF include furniture and cabinet components, architectural moldings, doors, store fixtures, core material for hardwood plywood, commercial wall paneling and substrate for laminate flooring.

Worldwide, the MDF industry has undergone dramatic growth in terms of productive capacity and demand for its products. Manufacturers compete on a global scale on the basis of price, quality, service and the availability of specialty products. Additionally, MDF is a ready substitute for solid wood, hardboard and plywood in specific applications. The North American MDF industry is well positioned for a period of high capacity utilization, as consumption continues to grow while little new domestic capacity is scheduled to come on-line for the next few years. However, utilization rates could well be held in check by cost competitive imports from New Zealand, Asia and South America that have grown recently due to the relative strength of the U.S. dollar.

Other Segment—Natural Resources

As part of our natural resources business, we focus on creating value from our extensive property ownership, including opportunities relating to mineral extraction, natural gas production, and communication and transportation rights of way. This segment represents a diverse array of natural resource products and markets subject to widely varying forms and levels of competition. Our strategy involves forming strategic alliances with industry specific leaders to identify and pursue such opportunities, as well as securing participation rights in select development projects.

Table of Contents

We currently receive royalty revenue from the extraction of oil and gas, minerals, and coal from some of our lands. In addition, one of our taxable REIT subsidiaries has entered into a joint operating agreement with Geomet, Inc., a coalbed methane developer, to jointly explore for and develop coalbed methane that may be found on certain of our lands in West Virginia and Virginia. In addition, we have the option to participate on additional properties on which Geomet, Inc. has secured coalbed methane rights.

TIMBER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP

Resource Management

We view our timberlands as assets with substantial inherent value. We strive to manage them in an economically prudent and environmentally responsible manner to enhance their value. We seek to enhance value by improving the productivity of our forests, controlling harvesting costs, and sorting and merchandising logs to obtain their highest value.

We use different management techniques in each of our regions, employing a variety of the most cost effective silvicultural methods available. We expect timber growth rates on our timberlands to continue to improve over time as a result of genetic advances in seedlings, intensive forest management practices such as thinning and fertilization, and the increasing proportion of our timberlands that are converted from natural forests to actively managed plantations. Technology and forest management advances have increased growth rates and shortened harvest cycles. We believe our focus on intensive management practices will enhance forest productivity and increase the value of our timberlands over time.

Value can be enhanced on younger timber stands through thinning operations. Value increases as trees grow and add wood volume more rapidly. Thinning a timber stand enables the healthier and potentially more valuable trees to grow more rapidly. As trees grow larger, they can be used in higher value applications such as high-grade lumber, plywood, and furniture. We also consider the impact of forest management activities on properties with potentially higher and better uses other than long-term timber production, and modify silviculture and harvest plans accordingly.

Intensive silvicultural applications, including the use of genetically improved seedlings, early and mid-rotation applications of fertilizers and chemicals to control plant competition, and pre-commercial thinning, will continue to enhance the growth and value of our timberlands. These projects improve not only the growth of the forests, but enhance the quality of the wood grown, reduce future harvesting costs, and shorten the length of harvest rotations.

It is our policy to ensure that every acre harvested is promptly reforested. Based on the geographic and climatic conditions of the harvest site, harvested areas may be regenerated naturally by leaving mature trees to reseed the area. Natural regeneration methods are used on a substantial portion of our timberlands in the Northern Resources Segment. In the Southern Resources Segment, substantially all reforestation is done by planting.

Forests are subject to a number of natural hazards, including damage by fire, insects and disease. Severe weather conditions and other natural disasters can also reduce the productivity of timberlands and disrupt the harvesting and delivery of forest products. While damage from natural causes is typically localized and would normally affect only a small portion of our timberlands at any one time, these hazards are unpredictable and losses might not be so limited. The size and diversity of our timberlands, together with our intensive forest management, should help to minimize these risks. Consistent with the practices of other large timber companies, we do not maintain insurance against loss to standing timber on our timberlands due to natural disasters, but we do maintain insurance for loss of already harvested logs due to fire and other occurrences.

Environmental Stewardship

We practice environmentally responsible resource management. We adhere to the philosophy that environmentally sound management practices contribute to the company’s growth in value by providing greater predictability in the management of its natural resource assets. Our practices follow a set of internal environmental principles aimed at the sound management of all natural resources. Among other areas of concern, these principles, which can be found in their entirety on the company’s website at www.plumcreek.com, focus on cooperative adjacent land

Table of Contents

In addition to these initiatives, we have actively engaged in habitat conservation planning. We currently manage approximately 2.3 million acres under five habitat conservation agreements. The habitats of hundreds of species are protected by these agreements, including twelve species listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. These conservation agreements include: the Cascade Region Habitat Conservation Plan in Washington State, which provides habitat protection for 285 species; the Grizzly Bear Conservation Agreement in the Swan Valley of western Montana; the Native Fish Habitat Conservation Plan, which covers 1.6 million acres of our land in the Northwest and provides for habitat protection of 12 species of native trout and salmon; the Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Conservation Plan, which covers approximately 266,000 acres of our timberlands in Arkansas and Louisiana; and the Karner Blue Butterfly Plan in Wisconsin. In addition to these completed conservation agreements, we are in the process of negotiating a “safe harbor agreement” with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service pursuant to which we will conserve additional habitat for the red-cockaded woodpecker on other portions of our Southern ownership not covered by our Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Conservation Plan. The safe harbor agreement is expected to cover approximately 600,000 acres in the aggregate.

RAW MATERIALS

Our lumber and plywood facilities obtain the vast majority of their raw logs from our timberlands. Our Montana timberlands provide a consistent supply of high quality logs and preferred timber species to our lumber and plywood facilities, although over time the average log size is expected to decline and the species mix is expected to change due to evolving harvest and growth patterns.

Our lumber and plywood facilities have and will continue to purchase stumpage and logs from external sources, including the United States Forest Service, Bureau of Indian Affairs, and state and private timberland owners. The geographic area in which our lumber and plywood facilities obtain logs may expand or contract from year to year as the cost of logs and value of manufactured products fluctuates. (For further discussion of other timber supply issues see “Federal and State Regulations.”) Our MDF facilities have a consistent supply of chips, sawdust and wood shavings from internal and external sources. Both MDF and plywood use large quantities of resins, which are procured from a reliable supplier.

COMPETITION

Markets for manufactured forest products are highly competitive in terms of price and quality. Many of our manufactured forest products competitors have substantially greater financial and operating resources. In addition, wood products are subject to increasing competition from a variety of substitutes, including non-wood and engineered wood products as well as import competition from other worldwide suppliers. We believe we can compete effectively because of our extensive private timber inventory, our reputation for environmentally responsible forestry, which has positioned us to meet regulatory challenges on a cost-effective basis, our reputation as a dependable, long-term supplier of quality products, our innovative approach to providing high-quality, value-added products to various retail and industrial niche markets and the integration of our timberlands with efficient manufacturing processes.

SEASONAL EFFECTS

Domestic log sales volumes from our Northern timberlands are typically at their lowest point in the second quarter of each year when warming weather thaws and softens roadbeds, thus restricting access to logging sites. Log sales volumes from our Southern Resources Segment are generally at their lowest point during the first quarter of each year, as winter rains limit operations.

Table of Contents

Demand for manufactured products is generally lower in the winter quarter when activity in construction markets is slower, and higher in the spring, summer and fall quarters when construction increases. Working capital varies with seasonal fluctuations.

FEDERAL AND STATE REGULATIONS

General Environmental Regulation

Our operations are subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, including laws relating to water, air, solid waste and hazardous substances and the requirements of the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Act and comparable state statutes relating to the health and safety of our employees. Although we believe that we are in material compliance with these requirements, there can be no assurance that we will not incur significant costs, civil and criminal penalties, and liabilities, including those relating to claims for damages to property or natural resources, resulting from our operations. We maintain environmental and safety compliance programs and conduct regular internal and independent third-party audits of our facilities and timberlands to monitor compliance with these laws and regulations.

Endangered Species

The Endangered Species Act protects species threatened with possible extinction. A number of species indigenous to our timberlands have been listed as threatened or endangered or have been proposed for one or the other status under the Endangered Species Act. As a result, our activities in or adjacent to the habitat of these species may be subject to restrictions on the harvesting of timber and the construction and use of roads.

We have received incidental take permits pursuant to the Cascade Region Habitat Conservation Plan, the Native Fish Habitat Conservation Plan, the Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Conservation Plan, and the Karner Blue Butterfly Habitat Conservation Plan from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (and from National Marine Fisheries Service, in the case of anadromous species) that together will cover our forest management on approximately 1,992,000 acres in the Northern Resources Segment and 266,000 acres in the Southern Resources Segment. As part of the permit application process under the Endangered Species Act, we prepared habitat conservation plans that will govern our management activities on the lands covered by the plans in these regions during the respective terms of the permits. The habitat conservation plans require us to maintain certain levels of wildlife and fish habitat, and to take numerous other mitigation measures including the protection of riparian areas. In consideration for this mitigation, the incidental take permits authorize forestry practices that are consistent with the plans, even though they may have an adverse impact on the listed species covered by the plans and permits.

We are currently in the process of negotiating a “safe harbor agreement” with the Fish and Wildlife Service to address the presence on or near some of our Southern properties of red-cockaded woodpeckers, listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Act. Under the proposed agreement, which would cover approximately 600,000 acres outside of the recently implemented Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Conservation Plan, we would agree to maintain Red-Cockaded Woodpecker habitat at or above baseline levels. In exchange we would be free to manage our lands for commercial timber production within the area of the plan even if such activities might incidentally impact Red-Cockaded Woodpecker habitat.

We are also party to an agreement with the Fish and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Forest Service, and the state of Montana to conserve grizzly bears. This agreement, which covers 83,000 acres of our timberlands in the Swan Valley in western Montana, requires that we protect the habitat of, and minimize the impact of our forestry activities on, the grizzly bear. In consideration for this mitigation, the Fish and Wildlife Service authorized forestry practices in the Swan Valley that are consistent with the agreement, but that may have an adverse effect on grizzly bears.

Although the habitat conservation plans and the grizzly bear agreement have been implemented and are functioning as expected, there can be no assurance that they will remain in force or be sufficient to protect us against subsequent amendments of the Endangered Species Act. And while we expect that the safe harbor agreement for red-cockaded woodpeckers will help us effectively manage the presence of that species on our

Table of Contents

At this time, we believe that federal and state laws and regulations related to the protection of endangered species will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity. We anticipate, however, that increasingly strict laws and regulations relating to the environment, natural resources and forestry operations, as well as increased social concern over environmental issues, may result in additional restrictions on us leading to increased costs, additional capital expenditures and reduced operating flexibility. We believe that our experience provides us a relative competitive advantage in managing environmental risks.

Timberlands

Our forest practices are and will in the future be subject to specialized statutes and regulations in the states where we operate. Many of these states have enacted laws that regulate forestry operations, such as growing, harvesting and processing activities on timberlands. Among other requirements, these laws impose some reforestation obligations on the owners of timberlands. Several states require prior notification before beginning harvesting activities. A number of states require a regulatory review taking from 15 to 30 days or more prior to harvesting, depending upon the environmental and other sensitivities of the proposed activity. Other state laws and regulations control the following activities: slash burning and harvesting during fire hazard periods; activities that affect water courses or are in proximity to inland shore lines; and activities that affect water quality, and some grading and road construction activities.

ENCUMBRANCES

Under the terms of our debt agreements, we have agreed not to pledge, assign or transfer timberlands, except under limited circumstances. The holders of our $64 million face value 11.125% First Mortgage Notes due 2007 have a first mortgage lien on a significant portion of our lumber, plywood and MDF facilities.

The title to our timberlands does not always include the related hard rock mineral interests or oil and gas rights. Title to the timberlands is subject to presently existing easements, rights of way, flowage and flooding rights, servitudes, hunting and other leases, licenses and permits, none of which materially adversely affect the value of the timberlands or materially restrict the harvesting of timber or other operations.

EMPLOYEES

We currently have approximately 800 salaried and 1,250 non-union hourly employees. We believe that our employee relations are good. Our wage scale and benefits are generally competitive with other forest products companies. The planting of seedlings, and the harvesting and delivery of logs is conducted by independent contractors who are not our employees.

Item 2. Properties

We believe that our timberlands and manufacturing facilities are suitable and adequate for current operations. The manufacturing facilities are owned and are maintained through on-going capital investments, regular maintenance and equipment upgrades. The majority of the manufacturing facilities are modern facilities. During 2002 the newly constructed thin-board production facility adjacent to our existing medium density fiberboard facility moved from start up phase towards full production. This new thin-board line complements our existing product line. During 2001, our lumber and plywood facilities reduced production by 5% to 10% as a result of weak market conditions and to better align our lumber and plywood production to our timberland harvests. During 2002, our lumber and plywood facilities operated at levels similar to 2001. See Item 1. Business for discussion of the location and description of properties and encumbrances related to properties.

Table of Contents

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

In its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, the company disclosed that a review of capital improvement projects at its Columbia Falls and Evergreen manufacturing facilities to evaluate compliance with the Clean Air Act revealed four potential violations between 1988 and 1992. The company voluntarily disclosed this information to the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) under its Voluntary Disclosure and Cooperation Policy (“EPA Policy”), and to the state of Montana Department of Environmental Quality (“Montana DEQ”) under the Montana Voluntary Disclosure Act (“Montana Act”). On meeting specified conditions and subject to the nature and seriousness of the offenses, both the EPA Policy and the Montana Act provide for elimination of any penalty.

The EPA and Montana DEQ have advised the company that no fine will be sought for the potential violations because the company complied with the EPA Policy and had gained no economic benefit from the potential violations.

In its Quarterly Report for the period ended June 30, 2002, the company reported that in the course of routine testing at its Evergreen manufacturing facility in Montana, company engineers discovered that certain “bags” designed to regulate particulate emissions from the facility had developed holes, resulting in elevated emission levels. The company immediately replaced the malfunctioning bags and notified Montana DEQ. Notwithstanding the company’s corrective actions, the agency’s enforcement division has advised the company that it will be fined $36,800.

There is no pending or threatened litigation involving the company that we believe would have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Executive officers are elected annually at the first quarterly meeting of the board of directors following the annual meeting of stockholders.

(A)	Served since January 1994 as President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Holley was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from April 1989 to December 1993.
(B)	Served since May 1999 as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Brown was Vice President, Strategic Business Development from January 1998 to May 1999, Vice President, Resource Management from February 1995 to January 1998, and Director, Planning from August 1990 to February 1995.
(C)	Served since August 2001 as Executive Vice President. Mr. Covey was Senior Vice President from August 2000 to August 2001, Vice President, Resources from January 1998 to August 2000, General Manager, Rocky Mountain Timberlands from August 1996 to January 1998, Director of Operations, Rocky Mountain Region from June 1995 to August 1996, and Plant Manager, Ksanka Sawmill from August 1992 to June 1995.

Table of Contents

(D)	Served since December 2001 as Executive Vice President. Mr. Lindquist was Executive Vice President of Global Sales and Corporate Alliances from June 1986 to December 2001 for Trammell Crow Company.

(E)	Served since January 2002 as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Mr. Kraft was Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from April 1996 to January 2002, Vice President, Law from January 1994 to April 1996 and Vice President, Law and Corporate Affairs from April 1989 to December 1993.
(F)	Served since January 2002 as Vice President, Controller. Mr. Brown was Controller from November 1994 to January 2002 and Director of Planning from July 1994 to November 1994.
(G)	Served since April 1997 as Vice President, Human Resources. From October 1995 through March 1997, Ms. Crowe was Vice President, Human Resources for Weight Watchers Gourmet Food Co., a subsidiary of the H.J. Heinz Company. From November 1991 through September 1995, Ms. Crowe worked in Human Resources at Ore-Ida Foods, Inc., a subsidiary of the H.J. Heinz Company, first as Manager, then as General Manager.
(H)	Served since June 2002 as Vice President, Audit and Financial Services. Ms. Fitzmaurice was a Partner with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP from 1997 through 2001.
(I)	Served since January 2002 as Vice President, Treasurer. Mr. Lambert was Director of Planning, Treasurer from June 1998 to January 2002 and Director of Finance and Treasurer from November 1994 to June 1998.
(J)	Since July 1, 1999 Ms. Crowe and Messrs. Holley, Brown, Brown, Covey, Kraft and Lambert have served in their indicated capacities for Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. Prior to the REIT conversion, the listed individuals served in their indicated capacities of the general partner of Plum Creek Timber Company, L.P. or the predecessor of the general partner. There are no family relationships among them.

Part II

Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc.’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange and the Pacific Exchange. As of February 21, 2003, there were approximately 29,530 registered owners of 184,131,362 outstanding shares.

Trading price data, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape, and declared cash dividend information for 2002 and 2001, are as follows:

(A)	Plum Creek paid dividends of $0.57 per share on November 30, 2001 and again on December 28, 2001. The December 28, 2001 dividend represents the acceleration of our fourth quarter 2001 dividend that normally would have been paid in February 2002. See Note 5 of the Notes to Financial Statements.

Future dividends will be determined by our board of directors, in its sole discretion, based on consideration of a number of factors including, but not limited to, our results of operations, cash flow and capital requirements, economic conditions, tax considerations, debt covenant restrictions that may impose limitations on our ability to make cash payments, borrowing capacity, changes in the price and demand for our products and the general market for timberlands and those timberland properties that have higher and better uses. Other factors that our board of directors considers include the appropriate timing of timber harvests, acquisition and divestiture opportunities, stock repurchases, debt repayment and other means by which the company delivers value to our stockholders.

Table of Contents

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table summarizes options and other rights outstanding under Plum Creek’s equity based compensation plans as of December 31, 2002:

(A)	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options.
(B)	Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options.
(C)	Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans, excluding securities reflected in column (a). Represents shares available for future issuance under the Stock Incentive Plan. See Note 11 of the Notes to Financial Statements for a description of the various stock-based grants that may be issued under the Stock Incentive Plan. At December 31, 2002, 1.2 million shares of the 3.4 million shares available for issuance under Plum Creek’s Stock Incentive Plan have been used for the grant of non-qualified stock options, the exercise of non-qualified stock options or the grant of restricted stock. Shares issued in connection with dividend equivalents and value management awards are not determinable until after the end of their respective performance periods.

(D)

As of December 31, 2002, there are 933,300 outstanding options to acquire Plum Creek common stock that were issued originally under the Georgia-Pacific long-term incentive plans as options to acquire Timber Company Stock. These stock options have a weighted average exercise price of $15.99 per common share and were assumed by the company in connection with The Timber Company Merger. Although the company’s stockholders did not separately approve the assumption of these stock options, the stockholders did approve each of The Timber Company Merger and the related merger agreement (and all of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the company’s assumption of the stock options). No additional Plum Creek stock options may be granted under the Georgia-Pacific long-term incentive plans as a result of The Timber Company Merger. See Note 11 of the Notes to Financial Statements.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

On December 16, 1997, shareholders of Georgia-Pacific Corporation (“Georgia-Pacific”) approved the creation of two classes of common stock intended to reflect separately the performance of Georgia-Pacific’s manufacturing (“Georgia-Pacific Group”) and timber businesses (“The Timber Company”). The Timber Company represented the separate group of businesses whose results have been tracked by Georgia-Pacific’s Timber Company stock (“Timber Company Stock”) and was engaged primarily in the growing and selling of timber on the approximately 4.7 million acres of timberlands that Georgia-Pacific owned or leased.

On October 5, 2001, Georgia-Pacific redeemed all of the outstanding shares of Timber Company Stock, or 82.3 million shares. In connection with the redemption, each outstanding share of Timber Company Stock was exchanged for one unit, or a “Unit,” that represented one outstanding share of common stock of each of the former subsidiaries (“Subsidiaries”) of Georgia-Pacific which collectively held all of the assets and liabilities attributed to The Timber Company. On October 6, 2001, holders of the Units received 1.37 shares of Plum Creek common stock for each Unit, totaling 112.7 million shares. Therefore, 112.7 million shares have been applied retroactively in computing basic earnings per share for all periods prior to the merger. Diluted earnings per share include the dilutive effect of 3.8 million outstanding options using the treasury stock method at the converted exercise prices ranging from $15.29 to $18.34 per share.

The Timber Company Merger was accounted for as a “reverse acquisition,” with The Timber Company being treated as the acquirer for accounting and financial reporting purposes. As a consequence, the historical financial statements of The Timber Company became the financial statements of Plum Creek effective as of October 6, 2001. The financial data for the year ended December 31, 2001 includes the operating results of The Timber

Table of Contents

As a consequence of The Timber Company Merger, which involved merging a taxable entity into a nontaxable entity, a tax benefit of $216 million was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2001. This tax benefit represented the elimination of a deferred tax liability associated with temporary differences related primarily to timberlands that are not expected to be disposed of in transactions subject to built-in gains tax during a ten-year period following the merger. During 2002, Plum Creek conducted most its activities through various wholly owned operating partnerships. The activities of the operating partnerships primarily consist of sales of timber under pay-as-cut contracts, and the income from such sales is not subject to corporate income tax. See Note 5 of the Notes to Financial Statements.

(A)	During the fourth quarter of 2002, Plum Creek acquired approximately 307,000 acres of timberlands located primarily in Wisconsin for $141 million. See Note 2 of the Notes to Financial Statements.
(B)	During 2001 the company changed its accounting policy for reforestation costs. See Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements.
(C)	During 1999 approximately 1,024,000 acres of timberlands were sold in three separate transactions. These transactions included 390,000 acres of timberlands in the Canadian province of New Brunswick, 440,000 acres of timberlands in Maine, and 194,000 acres of timberlands in California. These sales totaled $442 million and resulted in a $355 million pre-tax gain ($215 million after-tax gain).

(D)	During 1998 approximately 61,000 acres of timberlands in West Virginia were sold for approximately $26 million. Pre-tax gain on this sale was $24 million ($14 million after-tax gain).

(E)	Revenues have been restated to include proceeds from real estate sales. This reclassification had no impact on net income.
(F)	Since The Timber Company was not a separate legal entity but rather an operating division of Georgia-Pacific, The Timber Company common stock, the only equity issued with respect to The Timber Company, represented a class of Georgia-Pacific’s common stock. The Timber Company common stock paid a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Subsequent to The Timber Company Merger, Plum Creek paid dividends of $0.57 per share on November 30, 2001 and again on December 28, 2001. The December 28, 2001 dividend represents the acceleration of our fourth quarter 2001 dividend that normally would have been paid in February 2002. See Note 5 of the Notes to Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements

This Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Some of the forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “believes”, “expects”, “may”, “will”, “should”, “seeks”, “approximately”, “intends”, “plans”, “estimates”, “projects”, “strategy”, or “anticipates”, or the negative of those words or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements, including those factors described in “Risk Factors” immediately following this Item 7. Some factors include changes in governmental, legislative and environmental restrictions, catastrophic losses from fires, floods, windstorms, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, insect infestations or diseases, as well as changes in economic conditions and competition in our domestic and export markets and other factors described from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, factors that could cause our actual results to differ from those contemplated by our projected, forecasted, estimated or budgeted results as reflected in forward-looking statements relating to our operations and business include, but are not limited to:

•	our failure to qualify as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, or our failure to achieve the expected competitive advantages of operating as a REIT;
•	an unanticipated reduction in the demand for timber products and/or an unanticipated increase in the supply of timber products;
•	an unanticipated reduction in demand for higher and better use timberlands;
•	our failure to make strategic acquisitions or to integrate any such acquisitions effectively or, conversely, our failure to make strategic divestitures; and
•	the failure to meet our expectations with respect to our likely future performance.

It is likely that if one or more of the risks materializes, or if one or more assumptions prove to be incorrect, the current expectations of Plum Creek and its management will not be realized. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made, and neither Plum Creek nor its management undertakes any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements.

Overview

Merger with The Timber Company. On October 6, 2001, the six entities that comprised The Timber Company, formerly a separate operating group of Georgia-Pacific Corporation (“Georgia-Pacific”), merged with and into Plum Creek, with Plum Creek as the surviving company. As a part of the merger, the shareholders of Georgia-Pacific Corporation— Timber Group Common Stock (“Timber Company Stock”) received 1.37 shares of Plum Creek’s common stock for each share of Timber Company Stock, or approximately 112.7 million shares. The merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition, with The Timber Company treated as the acquirer for accounting and financial reporting purposes. As a result, the historical financial statements of The Timber Company became the financial statements of Plum Creek effective as of the date of the merger. Consequently, our financial statements for 2002 reflect a full year of combined operations of the merged companies whereas the statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2001 reflects the performance of The Timber Company until the date of the merger, and that of the merged companies for the remainder of 2001. The statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2000 reflects only the operating results of The Timber Company. See Note 2 of the Notes to Financial Statements.

Prior to The Timber Company Merger, The Timber Company had only one reportable segment. Following the merger, the combined companies report the results of five business segments. The Timber Company’s historical segment information has been restated back to the beginning of 2000 to reflect these new segments. Furthermore, the period-to-period comparison of the results of operations for 2002 compared to 2001 and 2001 compared to

Table of Contents

Additionally, in connection with the merger Plum Creek replaced approximately $650 million of Georgia-Pacific debt attributed to The Timber Company with third party debt, consisting of $500 million of fixed rate debt and $150 million of variable rate debt. Plum Creek also assumed approximately 3.8 million outstanding stock options (after adjusting for the exchange ratio) with respect to Timber Company Stock at exercise prices ranging from $15.29 to $18.34 (after adjusting for the exchange ratio). See Notes 1, 6 and 11 of the Notes to Financial Statements.

Plum Creek has elected to be taxed as a REIT under sections 856 through 860 of the United States Internal Revenue Code. As a consequence of The Timber Company Merger, a tax benefit of approximately $216 million was recorded to reflect the elimination of a deferred tax liability associated with temporary differences related primarily to timberlands that are not expected to be disposed of in a transaction subject to built-in gains tax during a ten-year period. Additionally, Plum Creek inherited the accumulated earnings and profits of The Timber Company and, because of certain REIT requirements, was required to distribute these earnings and profits prior to January 31, 2002. As a result, our fourth quarter 2001 dividend of $0.57 per share was accelerated and paid on December 28, 2001. The dividend normally would have been paid in February 2002. See Note 5 of the Notes to Financial Statements.

Other Merger Related Items. During 2001, we had the following other merger related items which had an impact on our results of operations:

	(1)	Income Tax Benefit. As a result of the entities comprising The Timber Company, each a taxable corporation, merging into Plum Creek, a REIT, which is generally not subject to federal or state income tax, a tax benefit of $216 million was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2001. The benefit relates primarily to the elimination of the deferred tax liability associated with temporary differences related primarily to timberlands that are not expected to be disposed of in a transaction subject to built-in gains tax during the ten-year period following the merger. See Note 5 of the Notes to Financial Statements.
	(2)	Severance. In connection with The Timber Company Merger, the employment of several executives and key employees of The Timber Company terminated. Terminated employees were paid a severance and two terminated executives of The Timber Company were awarded additional pension benefits. An expense of $6 million was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2001 for these severance and pension benefits.

Accounting Method Changes. In 2002, the company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”. The change in accounting method is effective January 1, 2002 prospectively to all employee awards granted, modified, or settled after January 1, 2002. Under the transition provisions of SFAS No. 123 (as amended), no cumulative effect is recorded for this accounting change. Stock-based employee compensation expense recognized for stock options granted in 2002 was approximately $400,000. Prior to 2002, the company accounted for its stock-based employee compensation plans under the recognition and measurement provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related Interpretations. Except for approximately $600,000 related to the acceleration in vesting of certain Timber Company options in 2001, no stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in 2001 and 2000 net income, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. See Notes 1 and 11 of the Notes to Financial Statements.

In the fourth quarter of 2001, the company changed its accounting policy to capitalize certain timber reforestation costs that were previously expensed. The cumulative effect of this policy change is not reflected in the beginning balance of Timber and Timberlands because information is not available to compute the cumulative effect of the change over the prior harvest cycle of approximately 30 years. The new capitalization policy was applied

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe that the following critical accounting policies affect our most significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of our consolidated financial statements:

Revenue Recognition. Prior to The Timber Company Merger, The Timber Company recognized revenue from timber sales under three different methods, depending upon the terms of the sale. The methods were delivered log sales, pay-as-cut contracts and timber deeds:

	(1)	Under a delivered log sale agreement, the seller cuts the tree and delivers it to the buyer. Risk of loss and title transfer to the buyer when the log is delivered. Revenue is recognized when the log is delivered to the customer. With delivered log sales, the seller incurs the cost of logging and hauling. For the last few days of an accounting period, there are typically delivered logs for which we have not received documentation and we have not created an invoice. In that case, an accrual for these deliveries is made along with an accrual for the costs of logging and hauling.
	(2)	Pay-as-cut contacts are agreements pursuant to which the buyer agrees to harvest all of the trees on a tract of land for an agreed upon price for each of the different types of trees over the term of the contract (usually 12 to 18 months). In some cases an advance is received in connection with pay-as-cut contracts, and in other cases the buyer agrees to cut only certain trees on a tract of land. Under pay-as-cut contracts, the buyer is responsible for all logging and hauling costs. Title and risk of loss transfer to the buyer as the trees are cut. The buyer furnishes us with supporting information for the amount of wood that has been removed along with their payment. Revenue is recognized when the trees are cut. Total revenue recognized under a pay-as-cut contract is a function of the total volume of wood actually removed multiplied by the agreed upon per unit price for each of the various types of trees on a tract of land. There is typically a lag between the time the tree is harvested and the time the buyer pays for the tree. At the end of each accounting period, we typically make an accrual for the trees that have been cut but for which we have not received payment.
	(3)	Timber deeds are agreements pursuant to which the buyer agrees to harvest all of the trees on a tract of land over the term of the contract (usually 12 to 18 months). However, unlike a pay-as-cut contract, risk of loss and title to the trees transfer to the buyer when the contract is signed. The buyer also pays the full purchase price when the contract is signed. Under a timber deed, the buyer is responsible for all logging and hauling costs. Revenue from a timber deed sale is recognized when the contract is signed. Timber deeds are generally marketed and sold to the highest bidder. Bids are typically based on a timber cruise— an estimate of the total volume of timber on a tract of land broken down by the various types of trees (such as softwood sawlogs, hardwood pulpwood, etc.). Total revenue recognized under a timber deed is the amount of the highest bid and is not dependent upon the volume or types of trees actually harvested.

Subsequent to The Timber Company Merger, to comply with certain REIT requirements we replaced timber deed agreements with lump-sum sale agreements. Under a lump-sum sale, the parties agree to a lump-sum price for all the timber available for harvest on a tract of land. Generally the lump-sum price is paid when the contract is signed. However, unlike timber deeds, title to the timber and risk of loss transfers to the buyer as the timber is cut. Therefore, revenue is recognized each month based on the amount of timber actually harvested, compared to total

Table of Contents

Since revenue is recognized under a lump-sum sale agreement as the trees are cut, an estimate of how much revenue to recognize each month is made based on how much volume has been removed compared to the total volume available for harvest on a tract of land according to the timber cruise. We generally receive weekly information from the buyer regarding how much volume has been removed. Additionally, we gather information by observing the tract to estimate the percentage of original timber harvested. Inevitably, the total volume harvested from a tract of land will be different than the volume estimated in the timber cruise. If the total volume removed is greater than the cruise-estimated volume, we will stop recognizing revenue once the total revenue recognized is equal to total lump-sum contract price. No revenue will be recognized for volumes harvested in excess of the cruise-estimated volume. If the total volume removed is less than the cruise-estimated volume, an adjustment will be recorded in the month in which we learn of the difference. The adjustment is an increase in revenue equal to the difference between the total revenue recognized to date and the total lump-sum contract price. Finally, for our larger lump-sum contracts which cover multiple tracts, we adjust revenues at the end of each accounting period for any known trends which have materialized in the tracts that have been completely harvested. While the timing of revenue recognition under a timber deed and a lump-sum contract is materially different, this change is not expected to have a material impact on the year-to-year comparison of our results of operations.

The amount of delivered log sales to external customers during 2002 was $441 million. The amount of pay-as-cut sales during 2002 was $89 million and the amount of revenue recognized under lump-sum sale contracts during 2002 was $96 million. At December 31, 2002 accrued revenues for delivered and pay-as-cut log sales was $24 million and deferred revenues for lump-sum contracts was $8 million. Management attempts to estimate accrued revenues at the end of each accounting period based on the best information available. Management does not believe that there is a material difference between estimated accrued revenues and actual revenues.

Substantially all of our timber sales in the Northern Resources Segment are under delivered log sale agreements. In our Southern Resources Segment, a substantial portion of our timber sales consists of either pay-as-cut contracts or lump-sum sales. Under both pay-as-cut contracts and lump-sum sales, the buyer is responsible for the logging and hauling costs. Therefore, operating profit percentages are significantly higher in our Southern Resources Segment.

Real Estate Sales. As a major landowner, we estimate that approximately 400,000 acres of the company’s approximately 8 million acres of timberlands are located in recreational areas or near expanding population centers and may be better suited for conservation, residential or recreational purposes, rather than for long-term commercial timberland management. Furthermore, the company estimates that an additional 900,000 acres may also be suited for conservation, residential or recreational development. The timing of real estate sales is a function of many factors, including the availability of government and not-for-profit funding, the general state of the economy, the plans of adjacent landowners, our expectation of future price appreciation and the timing of harvesting activities. Furthermore, from time to time we dispose of large non-strategic timberland holdings, which may result in material gains and losses from real estate sales. As a result, the timing of our real estate sales may materially impact our reported operating income and net income.

Historically, our Real Estate Segment has reported significant operating profit percentages (ranging from 65% to 85% of revenues), and this trend is expected to continue in the future. The high operating profit percentages are primarily because a significant portion of our timberlands was acquired many years ago. Under generally accepted accounting principles, the annual appreciation in our timberlands cannot be reflected in our earnings until the year in which we sell the properties.

Furthermore, in connection with major timberland acquisitions we are generally not able to identify our future real estate sales. This was the case in our merger with The Timber Company. Since the merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition, the timberlands of Plum Creek were recorded at their fair value. However, while our purchase

Table of Contents

Management believes that current and future results of operations could be materially different under different purchase price allocation assumptions, and it does not believe that it has the ability, with any level of precision, to estimate which of our properties will someday sell for more than their underlying timber production value.

Depletion. Depletion expense for 2002 was $74 million. Depletion, or costs attributed to timber harvested, is recorded as trees are harvested. Depletion rates for each region are adjusted annually. Depletion rates are computed by dividing (A) the sum of (1) the original cost of the timber less previously recorded depletion plus (2) estimated future silviculture costs, including the impact of inflation, that are expected to be incurred over the next harvest cycle, by (B) the total timber volume that is estimated to be harvested over the harvest cycle. The harvest cycle can be as short as 20 years in the South and as long as 90 years in the North. The estimate of future silviculture costs is limited to the expenditures that are expected to impact growth rates over the harvest cycle. The depletion rate calculations do not include an estimate for either future reforestation costs associated with a stand’s final harvest or future volume in connection with the replanting of a stand subsequent to its final harvest.

For the Northern Resources Segment depletion expense in 2002 was $28 million. The average depletion rate for the Northern Resources Segment was $5.19 per ton during 2002. The amount of estimated future silviculture costs, including the impact of inflation, for the Northern Resources Segment included in the calculation of the depletion rate was $141 million. The estimated future volume for the Northern Resources Segment included in the calculation of the depletion rate was 263 million tons. If the estimated future silviculture costs were increased by 10%, or $14 million, and assuming future timber volumes do not change, then the 2002 depletion expense for the Northern Resources Segment would have increased by $1 million. If the estimate of future volume for the Northern Resources Segment was decreased by 10%, or 26 million tons, and assuming future silviculture costs do not change, then the 2002 depletion expense for the Northern Resources Segment would have increased by $2 million.

For the Southern Resources Segment depletion expense in 2002 was $46 million. The average depletion rate for the Southern Resources Segment was $3.30 per ton during 2002. The amount of estimated future silviculture costs, including the impact of inflation, for the Southern Resources Segment included in the calculation of the depletion rate was $330 million. The estimated future volume for the Southern Resources Segment included in the calculation of the depletion rate was 417 million tons. If the estimated future silviculture costs were increased by 10% or $33 million and assuming future timber volumes do not change, then the 2002 depletion expense for the Southern Resources Segment would have increased by $1 million. If the estimate of future volume for the Southern Resources Segment was decreased by 10%, or 42 million tons, and assuming future silviculture costs do not change, then the 2002 depletion expense for the Southern Resources Segment would have increased by $5 million.

Significant estimates and judgments are required to determine both future silviculture costs and the volume of timber available for harvest over the harvest cycle. Some of the factors impacting the estimates are changes in weather patterns, inflation rates, the cost of fertilizers and chemicals, the cost of capital, the actual and estimated increase in growth rates from fertilizer applications, the relative price of sawlogs and pulpwood, the actual and expected real price appreciation of timber, the scientific advancement in seedling and growing technology, and changes in harvest cycles.

The company has invested in technology that enables it to predict its current standing inventory of trees, future growth rates, and the benefits of scientific advancements in connection with seedlings, planting techniques and

Table of Contents

Deferred Income Taxes. Plum Creek has elected to be taxed as a REIT under sections 856-860 of the United States Internal Revenue Code commencing July 1, 1999. A REIT is generally not subject to corporate-level tax if it satisfies certain requirements. On October 6, 2001, The Timber Company, consisting of a group of corporate entities, merged with and into Plum Creek. As a consequence of the merger of a taxable entity into a nontaxable entity, the deferred tax liabilities of The Timber Company were eliminated except for any expected transactions that would be subject to built-in gains tax.

Plum Creek will generally be subject to corporate-level tax (built-in gains tax) only if it makes a taxable disposition of certain property acquired in The Timber Company Merger within the ten-year period following the merger date. The built-in gains tax only applies to gains from such asset sales to the extent the fair value of the property exceeds its tax basis at the merger date. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” the company recorded a tax benefit of $216 million in the fourth quarter of 2001 as a result of The Timber Company Merger. The benefit of $216 million represents the elimination of the deferred tax liability associated with temporary differences related primarily to timberlands that are not expected to be disposed of in a transaction subject to built-in gains tax during a ten-year period following the merger.

Management estimates that approximately 5% of The Timber Company’s timberlands will be sold in one or more taxable transactions over the ten-year period ending October 5, 2011. As a result, $11 million of deferred taxes related to timberlands were not eliminated during the fourth quarter of 2001. Timberland sales subject to the built-in gains tax during 2002 reduced our deferred tax liability by $245,000. This amount was lower than originally estimated because a significant portion of the proceeds from our 2002 timberland sales that would otherwise be subject to the built-in gains tax were reinvested in like-kind property. The built-in gains tax can generally be avoided to the extent proceeds are reinvested in like-kind property within the statutory time period. It is not possible to predict whether we will be able to identify suitable replacement properties in the future in order to avoid the built-in gains tax. It is likely that actual timberland sales over the ten-year built-in gain period will be greater than, or less than, 5%. An adjustment to earnings will be required in the period in which it is determined that timberland sales subject to the built-in gains tax will be greater than, or less than, 5%.

Long-Term Incentive Plans. Plum Creek has a Stock Incentive Plan that provides for the award of non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, dividend equivalents and value management awards. See Note 11 of the Notes to Financial Statements. During 2002 the company recognized $8 million of compensation expense associated with its long-term incentive plans, of which $5 million related to value management awards.

Value management awards, which are granted every other year, provide incentive compensation to participants that is contingent upon the company’s performance measured against the performance of a peer group of forest products companies over a three-year period. Value management awards are earned in whole or in part based on a sliding scale. No value management award is earned if the company’s total stockholder return is below the 50th percentile of the peer group. The full value management award is earned if the company’s total stockholder return is above the 75th percentile.

Plum Creek recognizes compensation expense for value management awards based on the expected value of the award upon vesting and accrues the related expense over the vesting period. The actual expense cannot be determined until the end of the three-year performance period. Furthermore, since the amount of the award, if any, is based on Plum Creek’s relative performance compared to that of its peer group, it is possible to have significant changes to the estimated award value during the performance period. Compensation expense related to the value management awards is adjusted in the quarter in which there has been a material change in the expected vested value of the awards. Therefore, it is possible that an adjustment to the value management award expense may be material to the result of operations for the quarter and the year in which the estimated vested benefit is revised.

The performance period for the 2000 grants ended on December 31, 2002 in which the full value for the awards was achieved. A total expense of $8 million was recorded over the vesting period in connection with the 2000

Table of Contents

Pensions. Plum Creek provides pension benefits under defined benefit pension plans that cover substantially all of our employees. See Note 10 of the Notes to Financial Statements. Participants’ benefits vest after five years of service. Subsequent to The Timber Company Merger, the cash balance of benefits of salaried employees is determined based primarily on certain percentages of compensation, age, years of service and interest accrued based on the 30-year treasury bond rate. Furthermore, employees employed by the company on September 1, 2000 earn benefits based on the greater of the cash balance formula or the amount of a monthly pension benefit that is principally based on highest monthly average earnings during any consecutive sixty-month period and the number of years of service credit. The benefits of hourly employees are generally based on a fixed amount per year of service. Plum Creek’s contributions to the plan vary from year to year, but the company has made at least the minimum contributions required by law in each year and management intends to fund annually such that the fair value of plan assets equals or exceeds the actuarially computed accumulated benefit obligation (“ABO”, the approximate actuarially computed current pension obligation if the plans were discontinued). The plan invests in common stock, bonds and cash equivalents. The portfolio of investments during 2002 consisted of approximately 65% equities and 35% bonds.

The computation of the company’s benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets, pension cost and accrued pension liability under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make certain assumptions primarily involving the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, weighted average discount rate and rate of increase of future compensation levels. The expected return on plan assets for the year ended December 31, 2002 is based on the calculated value of plan assets and an 8.25% annual rate of return that is based on the composition of the pension plan assets. The assumed discount rate of 6.75% is based on Moody’s long-term AA corporate bond yield which is considered to represent the rate of return on high-quality fixed-income investments that, if invested at the measurement date, would provide the necessary future cash flows to pay the benefits when due. Finally, the assumed rate of increase of future compensation levels of 5.00% represents management’s long-term estimate of such increases on the basis of the composition of plan participants, past results and market expectations. Other key assumptions used in the estimate include primarily those underlying the mortality table, and expected long term rates for inflation, retirement and withdrawals, all of which are based on plan experience and standard actuarial methods but nevertheless subject to uncertainty.

For the year ended December 31, 2002, the company recognized $3.8 million of expense related to the pension plans and made cash contributions of $8.4 million. As of December 31, 2002, Plum Creek had fully funded the ABO and our balance sheet reflects an accrued net pension liability of $2.8 million.

It is likely that the actual return on plan assets and the outcome of other uncertain variables will differ from those used in estimating our pension costs and pension obligation reflected in our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. Furthermore, the company may, from time to time, adjust the asset allocation, which may have an impact on the long-term rate of return on plan assets. If the company had used a long-term rate of return on plan assets of 8.00% (instead of the 8.25% that was used in computing our 2002 pension expense), pension expense for 2002 would have increased by $0.2 million. Similarly, if the company had used a weighted average discount rate of 7.00% (instead of the 7.25% that was used in computing our 2002 pension expense), pension expense for 2002 would have increased by $0.3 million. Additionally, if the company had used a rate of increase in compensation levels of 5.25% (instead of the 5.00% that was used in computing our 2002 pension expense), pension expense for 2002 would have increased by $0.2 million. Finally, if the company had used a weighted average discount rate of 6.50% to fund pension obligations to at least the ABO consistent with company policy (instead of the 6.75% that was used in computing the ABO as of December 31, 2002), pension funding for 2002 would have increased by $1.7 million.

Table of Contents

Assuming an average long-term rate of return on plan assets of 8.25%, a weighted average discount rate of 6.75% and a 5% rate of increase in compensation levels, management projects that our annual pension expense for 2003 will be approximately $5 million, a $1.2 million, or 32%, increase compared to 2002, and will rise to approximately $7 million annually by 2005. Over the same time period the annual cash funding required under our present funding policy is expected to be approximately $4 million during 2003 increasing to approximately $6 million in 2005.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations, Contingent Liabilities and Commitments

The consolidated financial statements of the company reflect all of the operations and assets and liabilities of the company. The company has no relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities. Consequently, the company has no off-balance sheet debt. Furthermore, except for certain interest rate hedging transactions in 2002, discussed more fully in Note 8 of the Notes to Financial Statements, and a financing in connection with certain installment notes receivable, which were transferred to Georgia-Pacific prior to The Timber Company Merger, the company is not a party to any derivative transactions. Finally, the company does not have any transactions with related parties or affiliates other than those described in Note 12 of the Notes to Financial Statements.

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations, contingent liabilities and commitments at December 31, 2002 (in millions):

Events and Trends Affecting Operating Results

    Current Market Conditions

Northern Resources Segment. Softwood sawtimber prices declined in 2000 and 2001 and remained weak in 2002. The weak prices were due to an ample supply of logs, reduced exports of logs and lumber from the U.S. and weak lumber prices. Softwood sawtimber prices declined further during the fourth quarter of 2002 due to log imports from Canada, increased harvest levels from timber salvage operations by competitors and depressed lumber prices. Hardwood sawtimber markets improved slightly due to a tight supply of quality sawlogs.

Prices for pulpwood logs in our Northern Resource Segment declined by approximately 7% from 2001 levels. Pulpwood prices weakened due to the low demand from pulp and paper mills in the region due to worldwide overcapacity of mills that make paper products, weak pulp and paper prices and mill curtailments.

Southern Resources Segment. Prices for sawtimber logs in our Southern Resources Segment began declining during the second half of 2000 and continued declining during 2001. Prices during 2002 remained weak due to weak lumber and plywood prices and oversupplied sawlog markets due in part to exceptional access to timberlands as a result of a three-year drought. Log markets remained abundantly supplied due to higher yields on managed forests, shorter harvest cycles and lumber and plywood production curtailments.

Softwood pulpwood prices remained weak during 2002 due to reduced demand and an increase in the available supply of logs. Demand for softwood pulpwood declined due to the continued decline in the use of paper, the increase in recycling and the increase in paper and containerboard imports from Asia. The available supply of logs increased due to exceptional access to timberlands as a result of a three-year drought, the increase of plantation thinning volume from private landowners as a result of shorter harvest cycles, and a U.S. government soil conservation program.

Table of Contents

Manufactured Products Segment. Composite indices for commodity lumber in 2002 were down 5% from 2001 levels, due primarily to persistent excess lumber production in North America. Despite a 6% increase in housing starts from 2001 and the highest level of housing starts in sixteen years, strong production in the U.S. and Canada and reduced exports from the U.S. created an excess supply of lumber. North American lumber capacity continued to substantially exceed lumber demand due to the increased capacity installed by many producers during the prior decade. Duties were implemented on shipments of Canadian lumber to the U.S. in May 2002. To date, the duty has had the unanticipated impact of lowering lumber prices in part because large Canadian lumber producers have increased production in order to lower their per-unit manufacturing costs.

Prices for our plywood in 2002 remained similar to 2001. Prices for plywood remained weak due to continued competition from lower cost OSB, which constrained plywood prices and displaced commodity plywood used in housing applications. Prices for our Medium Density Fiberboard (“MDF”) remained weak during 2002 due to the continued worldwide MDF overcapacity and the strong U.S. dollar, which allowed foreign producers to significantly increase their penetration in the U.S. market.

    Harvest Plans

We determine our annual roundwood (sawlogs and pulpwood, including stumpage sales) harvesting plans based on a number of factors. At the stand level, ranging in size from 10 to 200 acres, we consider the age, size, density, health and economic maturity of the timber. A stand is a continuous block of trees of a similar age, species mix and silvicultural regime. At the forest level, ranging in size from 105,000 to 770,000 acres, we consider the long-term sustainability and environmental impact of certain levels of harvesting, a forest’s progression from an unmanaged to a managed forest, and the level of demand for wood within the region. A forest is a broad administrative unit, made up of a large number of stands.

Active forest management involves the conversion of a forest from an unmanaged to a managed state. An unmanaged forest is made up largely of mature and over-mature stands of timber which are growing slowly, both in terms of volume and value. In a managed forest, there exists a range of age classes, from recently planted stands to economically mature stands. The conversion of a forest from an unmanaged to a managed state can take from one to two forest generations, or rotations. Toward the end of the initial conversion process, a decline in the inventory volume is normal as the harvest of mature and over-mature stands ends, and as the younger, faster growing stands have yet to reach final harvest age.

Harvest levels in the Northern Resources Segment were 5.5 million tons during 2002 and 2.5 million tons during 2001, a 120% increase, due to The Timber Company Merger. Had the merger between Plum Creek and The Timber Company occurred prior to 2001, estimated harvest levels in the Northern Resources Segment for 2001 would have approximated 5.3 million tons. Harvest levels in 2003 are expected to increase 9%. This increase is due primarily to additional harvest in Wisconsin because of the acquisition of 307,000 acres in December 2002 and additional harvest in Oregon as young stands continue to reach maturity.

Harvest levels in the Southern Resources Segment were 13.8 million tons during 2002 and 11.4 million tons during 2001, a 21% increase, due to The Timber Company Merger. Had the merger between Plum Creek and The Timber Company occurred prior to 2001, estimated harvest levels in the Southern Resources Segment for 2001 would have approximated 13.0 million tons. Harvest levels in 2003 are expected to decrease 4% due primarily to lower hardwood pulpwood harvests. In 2002 and 2001, the company took advantage of favorable ground conditions and markets to accelerate harvests in areas with concentration of hardwood pulpwood.

Actual harvest levels may vary from planned levels due to log demand, sales prices, the availability of timber from other sources, the level of timberland sales and acquisitions, the availability of legal access, abnormal weather conditions, fires and other factors that may be outside of our control. We believe that our harvest plans are sufficiently flexible to permit modification in response to short-term fluctuations in the markets for logs.

Table of Contents

    U.S.—Canada Softwood Lumber Agreement.

The trade dispute between the United States and Canada continues to be a major source of uncertainty for U.S. lumber markets. On March 31, 2001, the five-year lumber trade agreement between the U.S. and Canada expired. The agreement was intended to limit the volume of lumber that was exported to the U.S. through the assessment of a tariff on annual lumber exports in excess of certain levels from the four major lumber producing Canadian provinces. Prior to this trade agreement, Canadian lumber producers were aggressively increasing their penetration into the U.S. market.

Soon after the agreement expired, U.S. industry coalitions submitted anti-dumping and countervailing duty petitions to the International Trade Commission and the U.S. Department of Commerce. On March 22, 2002, the Department of Commerce rendered its final determination in favor of the U.S. industry coalitions and set a 19.3% countervailing duty on Canadian lumber imports and an anti-dumping duty on all non-investigated Canadian exporters averaging 9.7% (representing the weighted average of the anti-dumping rates imposed on the investigated Canadian exporters). The Department of Commerce decreased these duties on April 26, 2002 to 18.8% and 8.4%, respectively. Following a final determination by the International Trade Commission on May 2, 2002 that Canadian lumber imports threaten the U.S. industry with material injury, the Department of Commerce put into effect the countervailing and anti-dumping duties on May 22, 2002. However, reports indicate that the final duties have not had the effect of decreasing Canadian lumber imports into the U.S.

The future of the U.S.-imposed import duties on Canadian lumber remains uncertain. The final import duties imposed by the Department of Commerce have been referred to appeals panels operating under the World Trade Organization and the North American Free Trade Agreement. These appeals could ultimately be determined adversely to U.S. interests, which could result in an increase of Canadian lumber imports into U.S. markets. Moreover, notwithstanding any favorable U.S. rulings, Canadian lumber imports could otherwise increase or remain at current levels. Currently, the U.S. and Canadian governments are attempting to negotiate an agreement to settle the lumber dispute. However, there can be no assurance that an agreement will ever be reached, or that the terms of any such agreement would be favorable to the interests of the U.S. lumber industry. Therefore, other factors remaining unchanged, downward pressure on domestic lumber and log prices caused by Canadian imports could continue or increase.

    Comparability of Financial Statement Periods.

We have pursued and expect to continue to pursue both the acquisition and divestiture of timberlands to increase the value of our assets. During the fourth quarter of 2002, we purchased 307,000 acres of timberlands located primarily in Wisconsin, and on October 6, 2001, we completed our merger with The Timber Company. As a result of these acquisitions, our ownership increased to approximately 8.0 million acres at December 31, 2002 and 7.8 million acres at December 31, 2001 from approximately 3.2 million acres at December 31, 2000. We may sell timberlands and facilities, from time to time, if attractive opportunities arise. Accordingly, the comparability of periods covered by the company’s financial statements is, and in the future may be, affected by the impact of acquisitions and divestitures.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following table compares operating income by segment for the years ended (in millions):

As a consequence of The Timber Company Merger and the related reverse acquisition accounting treatment, the financial results for 2002 are not comparable with 2001 and the financial results for 2001 are not comparable with 2000. In order to make the 2002 and 2001 results comparable, we have excluded in the analysis below the revenues and expenses related to Plum Creek’s assets and liabilities for the period January 1, 2002 to October 5, 2002. Furthermore, in order to make the 2001 and 2000 results comparable, we have excluded in the analysis below the revenues and expenses related to Plum Creek’s assets and liabilities for the period October 6, 2001 to December 31, 2001.

    2002 Compared to 2001

Northern Resources Segment. Revenues increased by $184 million, or 135%, to $320 million in 2002. Excluding revenues (for the period January 1, 2002 to October 5, 2002) associated with The Timber Company Merger, annual revenues increased by $22 million, or 16%, to $158 million in 2002. This increase of $22 million was due primarily to higher softwood sawlog sales volume as a result of the age class distribution of our Oregon Timberlands, which has an increasing percentage of mature timber.

Excluding the impact of The Timber Company Merger (for the period January 1, 2002 to October 5, 2002), Northern Resources Segment annual operating income was 28% of its revenues for 2002 and 22% for 2001. This increase was due primarily to higher softwood sawlog volume. Northern Resources Segment costs and expenses increased by $134 million, or 126%, to $240 million in 2002. Excluding costs and expenses (for the period January 1, 2002 to October 5, 2002) associated with The Timber Company Merger, annual costs and expenses increased by $8 million, or 8%, to $114 million. This increase of $8 million was due primarily to higher log and haul costs as a result of higher sales volume.

Southern Resources Segment. Revenues increased by $104 million, or 33%, to $423 million in 2002. Excluding revenues (for the period January 1, 2002 to October 5, 2002) associated with The Timber Company Merger, annual revenues increased by $63 million, or 20%, to $382 million in 2002. This increase of $63 million was due primarily to a higher percentage of delivered log sales ($37 million) and higher log sales volume ($35 million), offset in part by selling stumpage under lump-sum contracts as compared to timber deeds ($8 million).

Revenues increased by $37 million due to the company’s increased percentage of delivered log sales. The company increased its percentage of delivered log sales by decreasing its percentage of sales of standing timber. Under a delivered log sale agreement, the seller is responsible for log and haul costs. When standing timber is sold the buyer incurs the log and haul costs. While revenues are higher when the seller is responsible for the logging and hauling of timber, costs of sales generally increase by a similar amount. As a result, the company realizes lower margins as a percent of revenues, although operating income is not generally affected.

Table of Contents

Revenues increased by $35 million due to higher sales volume. The increased log sales volume was due primarily to a temporary (24 to 36 months) increase in harvest levels. This temporary increase resulted from accelerating the conversion of slower-growing natural stands to faster-growing plantations.

Excluding the impact of The Timber Company Merger (for the period January 1, 2002 to October 5, 2002), Southern Resources Segment annual operating income was 57% of its revenues for 2002 and 59% for 2001. Southern Resources Segment costs and expenses increased by $64 million, or 48%, to $196 million. Excluding costs and expenses (for the period January 1, 2002 to October 5, 2002) associated with The Timber Company Merger, costs and expenses increased by $33 million, or 25%, to $166 million in 2002. This increase was due primarily to an increase in log and haul costs as a result of a higher percentage of delivered log sales compared to sales of standing timber and higher sales volume.

Real Estate Segment. Revenues increased by $18 million, or 23%, to $98 million in 2002. Excluding revenues (for the period January 1, 2002 to October 5, 2002) associated with The Timber Company Merger, revenues decreased by $20 million, or 25%, to $60 million. This decrease of $20 million was due primarily to the timing of real estate sales. As a major landowner, approximately 400,000 acres of the company’s approximately 8 million acres of timberlands are located in recreational areas or near expanding population centers and may be better suited for conservation, residential or recreational purposes, rather than for long-term commercial timberland management. Furthermore, the company estimates that an additional 900,000 acres may also be suited for conservation, residential or recreational development. The timing of real estate sales is a function of many factors, including the availability of government and not-for-profit funding, the general state of the economy, the plans of adjacent landowners, the company’s expectation of future price appreciation and the timing of harvesting activities.

Excluding the impact of The Timber Company Merger (for the period January 1, 2002 to October 5, 2002), Real Estate Segment operating income was 78% of its revenues for 2002 and 74% for 2001. This increase was due primarily to a higher percentage of conservation easements during 2002. There is no book basis allocated to the sale of conservation easements. Real Estate Segment costs and expenses increased by $13 million, or 62%, to $34 million in 2002. Excluding costs and expenses (for the period January 1, 2002 to October 5, 2002) associated with The Timber Company Merger, costs and expenses decreased by $8 million, or 38%, to $13 million.

Manufactured Products Segment. Revenues increased by $295 million, or 343%, to $381 million in 2002. Excluding revenues (for the period January 1, 2002 to October 5, 2002) associated with The Timber Company Merger, revenues increased by $4 million, or 5%, to $90 million. This increase of $4 million was due primarily to our new thin-board MDF facility, which began operations in the fourth quarter of 2001. We sold 18 million square feet of thin-board MDF during the fourth quarter of 2002 compared to 5 million square feet during the fourth quarter of 2001.

Excluding the impact of The Timber Company Merger (for the period January 1, 2002 to October 5, 2002), Manufactured Products Segment operating loss was $5 million during 2002 compared to $1 million of operating income during 2001. This decrease in operating performance was due primarily to lower lumber prices as a result of excess supply caused by over production by U.S. and Canadian mills and higher MDF operating costs. Manufactured Products Segment costs and expenses increased by $295 million, or 347%, to $380 million in 2002. Excluding costs and expenses (for the period January 1, 2002 to October 5, 2002) associated with The Timber Company Merger, costs and expenses increased by $10 million, or 12%, to $95 million. This increase of $10 million was primarily due to higher MDF production volume and higher MDF operating costs.

Other Segment. Revenues were $9 million in 2002 and 2001. Expenses were $2 million during 2002, an increase of $1 million over 2001.

Other Costs and Eliminations. Other Costs and Eliminations (which consists of corporate overhead and intercompany profit elimination) decreased operating income by $41 million in 2002, compared to a decrease of $35 million in 2001. This change of $6 million was due primarily to $22 million of higher corporate expenses due to the increase in the size of the company, offset by a reduction of $10 million for intercompany profit elimination and $6 million for severance costs. During the fourth quarter of 2001, we incurred $6 million of merger-related

Table of Contents

Interest Expense. Net interest expense increased by $49 million, or 91%, to $103 million for 2002. This increase was due primarily to the $837 million of Plum Creek’s debt that was acquired in connection with The Timber Company Merger.

Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes was $2 million for 2002 compared to a net benefit of $142 million for 2001. During the fourth quarter of 2001, we recognized a tax benefit of $216 million in connection with The Timber Company Merger. For the period January 1, 2001 to October 5, 2001, The Timber Company recognized a tax expense of approximately $70 million. As a REIT, Plum Creek is generally not subject to corporate income tax except for certain transactions that are subject to built-in gains tax and certain non-REIT activities that are conducted through taxable REIT subsidiaries. See Note 5 of the Notes to Financial Statements.

    2001 Compared to 2000

Northern Resources Segment. Revenues increased by $57 million, or 72%, to $136 million in 2001. Excluding revenues (for the period October 6, 2001 to December 31, 2001) associated with The Timber Company Merger, revenues decreased by $8 million, or 10%, to $71 million. This decrease of $8 million was due primarily to lower softwood sawlog prices. Softwood sawlog prices decreased by 15% due primarily to weak lumber and plywood prices and an abundant supply of logs. Product prices decreased due primarily to the slowing U.S. economy and excess lumber and plywood capacity. There was an abundant supply of logs due primarily to numerous lumber and plywood mill closures as a result of weak product prices.

Excluding the impact of The Timber Company Merger (for the period October 6, 2001 to December 31, 2001), Northern Resources Segment operating income was 20% of its revenues for 2001 and 35% for 2000. This decline was due primarily to lower softwood sawlog prices. Northern Resources Segment costs and expenses increased by $54 million, or 104%, to $106 million in 2001. Excluding costs and expenses (for the period October 6, 2001 to December 31, 2001) associated with The Timber Company Merger, costs and expenses increased by $5 million, or 10%, to $57 million.

Southern Resources Segment. Revenues increased by $16 million, or 5%, to $319 million in 2001. Excluding revenues (for the period October 6, 2001 to December 31, 2001) associated with The Timber Company Merger, total revenues for this segment were stable at $303 million for both 2001 and 2000. However, even though total segment revenues did not change, there were significant changes in revenue components. Segment revenues decreased by $38 million due to lower log prices. However, this decrease was offset in part by increases of $18 million resulting from a higher percentage of delivered log sales, and $15 million resulting from higher harvest levels.

Softwood sawlog prices decreased by 14% due primarily to weak lumber and plywood prices and an abundant supply of logs. Product prices decreased due primarily to the slowing U.S. economy and excess lumber and plywood capacity. In turn, log supplies were abundant primarily because of numerous lumber and plywood mill closures resulting from weak product prices.

Revenues increased by $18 million due to a greater percentage of delivered log sales compared to sales of standing timber. Under a delivered log sale agreement, the seller is responsible for log and haul costs, whereas the buyer incurs these costs when standing timber is sold. While revenues are higher when the seller is responsible for the logging and hauling of timber, costs of sales generally increase by a similar amount.

Excluding the impact of The Timber Company Merger (for the period October 6, 2001 to December 31, 2001), Southern Resources Segment operating income was 60% of its revenues for 2001 and 65% for 2000. This decline

Table of Contents

Real Estate Segment. Revenues decreased by $23 million, or 22%, to $80 million in 2001. Excluding revenues (for the period October 6, 2001 to December 31, 2001) associated with The Timber Company Merger, revenues decreased by $29 million, or 28%, to $74 million. This decrease of $29 million was due primarily to the timing of real estate sales. As a major landowner, approximately 400,000 acres of the company’s approximately 8 million acres of timberlands are located in recreational areas or near expanding population centers and may be better suited for conservation, residential or recreational purposes, rather than for long-term commercial timberland management. Furthermore, the company estimates that an additional 900,000 acres may also be suited for conservation, residential or recreational development. The timing of real estate sales is a function of many factors, including the availability of government and not-for-profit funding, the general state of the economy, the plans of adjacent landowners, the company’s expectation of future price appreciation and the timing of harvesting activities.

Excluding the impact of The Timber Company Merger (for the period October 6, 2001 to December 31, 2001), Real Estate Segment operating income was 80% of its revenues for 2001 and 83% for 2000. Real Estate Segment costs and expenses increased by $3 million, or 17%, to $21 million in 2001. Excluding costs and expenses (for the period October 6, 2001 to December 31, 2001) associated with The Timber Company Merger, costs and expenses decreased by $3 million, or 17%, to $15 million.

Manufactured Products Segment. Prior to The Timber Company Merger, the financial statements represent those of The Timber Company which did not have any manufacturing operations. For the period October 6, 2001 to December 31, 2001 Manufactured Products Segment revenues were $86 million, expenses were $85 million and operating income was $1 million.

Other Segment. Revenues increased by $1 million, or 13%, to $9 million in 2001. Expenses were $1 million during 2001 but were less than $1 million during 2000.

Other Costs and Eliminations. Other Costs and Eliminations (which consists of corporate overhead and intercompany profit elimination) decreased operating income by $35 million in 2001, compared to a decrease of $15 million in 2000. This change of $20 million was due primarily to $9 million of intercompany profit elimination, $6 million of merger-related severance costs and higher corporate expenses due to the increase in size of the company. At December 31, 2001, the deferred profit on intercompany log sales was $9 million. Profit on intercompany log sales is deferred until the lumber and plywood manufacturing facilities convert existing log inventories into finished products and sell them to third parties. Prior to The Timber Company Merger, The Timber Company did not have any deferred profit on log sales.

Interest Expense. Net interest expense increased by $10 million, or 23%, to $54 million for 2001. This increase was due primarily to the $837 million of Plum Creek’s debt that was acquired in connection with The Timber Company Merger.

Financial Condition and Liquidity

Net cash provided by operating activity increased by $145 million, or 65%, to $368 million for 2002 compared to $223 million for 2001. The increase of $145 million was due primarily to The Timber Company Merger. As a

Table of Contents

Cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2002 was $246 million compared to $193 million at December 31, 2001. The increase was due primarily to Plum Creek accelerating the payment of the fourth quarter 2001 dividend. Plum Creek paid the dividend for the fourth quarter of 2001 on December 28, 2001. Normally, the fourth quarter dividend for 2001 would have been paid in February 2002. The payment of the fourth quarter 2001 dividend was accelerated because of our merger with The Timber Company and the REIT requirement under the Internal Revenue Code that all earnings and profits inherited in connection with a merger must be distributed by January 31st of the year following the merger.

On October 6, 2001, in connection with The Timber Company Merger, Plum Creek issued approximately 112.7 million shares and assumed 3.8 million stock options, and replaced the approximate $650 million of Georgia-Pacific debt that was allocated to The Timber Company with third party debt. The $650 million of debt was replaced with $500 million of fixed rate debt and $150 million of variable rate debt.

At December 31, 2002, our lines of credit were comprised of a $600 million revolving line of credit maturing on September 30, 2005 and a $150 million 364-day revolving line of credit maturing on November 25, 2003. The rates for both revolving lines of credit are based on LIBOR plus 1.5%, which includes facility fees. Interest rates for both revolving lines are based on a series of borrowings with maturities that can range from one week to six month. The average interest rate for both facilities at December 31, 2002 was 3.6% and on January 2, 2003, the average rate was 3.0%.

Borrowings on the lines of credit fluctuate daily based on cash needs. Subject to customary covenants, the lines of credit allow for borrowings from time to time up to $750 million, including up to $50 million of standby letters of credit. As of December 31, 2002, $80 million remained available for borrowing under the lines of credit and there were outstanding standby letters of credit of $658,000. In January 2003, $246 million of the borrowings under the line of credit was repaid. The 364-day Revolving Line of Credit was classified as long-term debt due to the company’s intent and subsequent refinancing of these borrowings on a long-term basis.

On January 22, 2003, the company issued $300 million of senior notes maturing serially in 2008 to 2013 consisting of the following (in millions):

The proceeds from the issuance of these notes were used to repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings under the lines of credit and for general business funding purposes.

Our borrowing agreements contain various restrictive covenants, including limitations on harvest levels, sales of assets, the incurrence of indebtedness and making restricted payments (such as payments of cash dividends or stock repurchases). Our borrowing agreements limit our ability to make restricted payments based on available cash, which is generally our net income after adjusting for non-cash charges (such as depreciation and depletion), changes in various reserves less capital expenditures and principal payments on indebtedness that are not financed. In addition, our lines of credit require that we maintain an interest coverage ratio and maximum leverage ratio. We were in compliance with all of our borrowing agreement covenants as of December 31, 2002.

Table of Contents

Cash required to meet our financial needs will be significant. We believe, however, that cash on hand and cash flows from continuing operations will be sufficient to fund planned capital expenditures, and interest and principal payments on our indebtedness for the next year.

On January 28, 2003, our board of directors declared a dividend of $0.35 per share for the fourth quarter of 2002. Total dividends for the fourth quarter will approximate $65 million and will be paid on February 28, 2003 to stockholders of record on February 14, 2003. Future dividends will be determined by our board of directors, in its sole discretion, based on consideration of a number of factors including, but not limited to, our results of operations, cash flow and capital requirements, economic conditions, tax considerations, debt covenant restrictions that may impose limitations on the company’s ability to make cash payments, borrowing capacity, changes in the price and demand for Plum Creek’s products and the general market for timberlands and those timberland properties that have higher and better uses. Other factors that our board of directors considers include the appropriate timing of timber harvests, acquisition and divestiture opportunities, stock repurchases, debt repayment and other means by which the company could deliver value to its stockholders. On October 17, 2002, our board authorized the company to buy back up to $200 million of the company’s outstanding common stock. In January 2003, the company began to purchase shares of common stock. As of February 28, 2003 the company had bought back 1,406,600 shares of common stock for a total cost of $30.4 million.

Capital expenditures for 2002 were $249 million, $59 million for 2001 and $135 million for 2000. The capital expenditures amount for 2002 includes approximately $141 million for the acquisition of 307,000 acres of timberlands located primarily in Wisconsin from Stora Enso North America Corporation. The $141 million purchase price was primarily financed using existing lines of credit. Planned capital expenditures for 2003 are expected to be approximately $92 million and include approximately $60 million for our timberlands, $15 million for the development of our coalbed methane and $6 million for our manufacturing facilities. The timberland expenditures are primarily for reforestation and other expenditures associated with the planting and growing of trees.

Other Information

In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” which is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The statement provides accounting and reporting standards for recognizing obligations related to asset retirement costs associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets. Under this statement, legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets are to be recognized at their fair value in the period in which they are incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The fair value of the asset retirement costs is capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset and expensed using a systematic and rational method over the assets’ useful lives. Any subsequent changes to the fair value of the liability will be expensed. Adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 45,“Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.” FIN No. 45 expands on the accounting guidance of FASB No. 5, 57 and 107 and incorporates without change the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 34. FIN No. 45 provides guidance for the initial recognition and measurement, applicable prospectively to all guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002, and disclosure requirements effective for financial statements of interim and annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2002. Adoption of this interpretation is not expected to have a material impact on the company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 46,“Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” FIN No. 46 clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements”, to certain entities in which equity investors do not have (i) the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or (ii) sufficient at-risk equity. FIN No. 46 applies to a broad range of unconsolidated investee entities (e.g. joint ventures, partnerships and cost basis investments) and, effective for financial statements issued after January 31,

Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS

Risk Factors Applicable to the Business of Plum Creek

Our results of operations are affected by the cyclical nature of the forest products industry. Prices and demand for logs and manufactured wood products are subject to cyclical fluctuations. The demand for logs and wood products is primarily affected by the level of new residential construction activity and, to a lesser extent, repair and remodeling activity and other industrial uses. The demand for logs is also affected by the demand for wood chips in the pulp and paper markets. These activities are, in turn, subject to fluctuations due to, among other factors:

•	changes in domestic and international economic conditions;
•	interest rates;
•	population growth and changing demographics; and
•	seasonal weather cycles (e.g., dry summers, wet winters).

Decreases in the level of residential construction activity generally reduce demand for logs and wood products. This results in lower revenues, profits and cash flows. Industry-wide increases in the supply of logs and wood products during favorable price environments can also lead to downward pressure on prices. Timber companies generally increase production volumes for logs and wood products during favorable price environments. However, such increased production, when coupled with even modest declines in demand for these products in general, could lead to oversupply and lower prices.

Our results of operations may also be subject to global economic changes as global supplies of wood fiber shift in response to changing economic conditions. Changes in global economic conditions that could affect our results of operations include, but are not limited to, new timber supply sources and changes in currency exchange rates, foreign and domestic interest rates and foreign and domestic trade policies.

In addition, the market for and ability to sell non-strategic timberlands and timberland properties that have higher and better uses can have a significant effect on our results of operations. Market demand for timberlands generally and higher and better use timberlands may decrease and adversely affect our results of operations.

    The Forest Products Industry is Highly Competitive

The forest products industry is highly competitive in terms of price and quality. Wood products are subject to increasing competition from a variety of substitute products, including non-wood and engineered wood products. For example, plywood markets are subject to competition from oriented strand board, and U.S. lumber and log markets are subject to competition from other worldwide suppliers.

Historically, Canada has been a significant source of lumber for the U.S. market, particularly in the new home construction market. In 1995, the U.S. and Canadian governments entered into a five-year lumber trade agreement that became effective April 1, 1996. The trade agreement was intended to limit the volume of Canadian lumber exported into the U.S. from the four major producing Canadian provinces through the assessment of an export tariff on annual lumber exports to the U.S. in excess of certain levels.

The trade agreement expired in late March 2001, and soon thereafter U.S. industry coalitions submitted anti-dumping and countervailing duty petitions to the International Trade Commission and the U.S. Department of Commerce. On March 22, 2002, the Department of Commerce rendered its final determination in favor of the U.S. industry coalitions and set a 19.3% countervailing duty on Canadian lumber imports and an anti-dumping duty on all non-investigated Canadian exporters averaging 9.7% (representing the weighted average of the anti-dumping rates imposed on the investigated Canadian exporters). The Department of Commerce decreased these

Table of Contents

The future of the U.S.-imposed import duties on Canadian lumber remains uncertain. The final import duties imposed by the Department of Commerce have been referred to appeals panels operating under the World Trade Organization and the North American Free Trade Agreement. These appeals could ultimately be determined adversely to U.S. interests, which could result in an increase of Canadian lumber imports into U.S. markets. Moreover, notwithstanding any favorable U.S. rulings, Canadian lumber imports could otherwise increase or remain at current levels. Currently, the U.S. and Canadian governments are attempting to negotiate an agreement to settle the lumber dispute. However, there can be no assurance that an agreement will ever be reached, or that the terms of any such agreement would be favorable to the interests of the U.S. lumber industry. Therefore, other factors remaining unchanged, downward pressure on domestic lumber and log prices caused by Canadian imports could continue or increase.

    Our Cash Dividends are Not Guaranteed and May Fluctuate

On July 1, 1999, we converted from a master limited partnership to a real estate investment trust, or “REIT.” REITs are required to distribute 90% of their net taxable ordinary income. However, unlike ordinary income such as rent, the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, does not require REITs to distribute capital gain income. Accordingly, we do not believe that the Internal Revenue Code will require us to distribute any material amounts of cash given that the majority of our income comes from timber sales, which are treated as capital gains. Our board of directors, in its sole discretion, determines the amount of the quarterly dividends to be provided to our stockholders based on consideration of a number of factors including, but not limited to, our results of operations, cash flow and capital requirements, economic conditions, tax considerations, borrowing capacity and other factors, including debt covenant restrictions that may impose limitations on cash payments, future acquisitions and divestitures, harvest levels, changes in the price and demand for our products and general market demand for timberlands and those timberland properties that have higher and better uses. Consequently, our dividend levels may fluctuate.

We were required by January 31, 2002, to distribute the earnings and profits acquired from the six entities that comprised The Timber Company. We believe that the accelerated payment of our fourth quarter dividend for 2001, which we paid on December 28, 2001, was sufficient to distribute these earnings and profits. If we failed to distribute an amount equal to these earnings and profits, we might be subject to adverse tax consequences. We expect that, even if the earnings and profits were subsequently adjusted upward by the Internal Revenue Service, the amount we distributed exceeds such earnings and profits. Nevertheless, such an adjustment may give rise to the imposition of the 4% excise tax on the excess income required to be distributed over the amounts treated as distributed after application of the earnings and profits rule.

    Our Ability to Harvest Timber May Be Subject to Limitations Which Could Adversely Affect Our Operations

Weather conditions, timber growth cycles, access limitations and regulatory requirements associated with the protection of wildlife and water resources may restrict harvesting of timberlands as may other factors, including damage by fire, insect infestation, disease, prolonged drought and other natural disasters. Although damage from such natural causes usually is localized and affects only a limited percentage of the timber, there can be no assurance that any damage affecting our timberlands will in fact be so limited. As is common in the forest products industry, we do not maintain insurance coverage with respect to damage to our timberlands.

Much of our Northwest timberlands are intermingled with sections of federal land managed by the United States Forest Service. In many cases, access is only, or most economically, achieved through a road or roads built across adjacent federal land. In order to access these intermingled timberlands, we have obtained from time to time either

Table of Contents

Our revenues, net income and cash flow from our operations are dependent to a significant extent on the pricing of our products and our continued ability to harvest timber at adequate levels. In addition, the terms of our long-term debt agreements and lines of credit limit our ability to fund dividends to stockholders by accelerating the harvest of significant amounts of timber.

    Provisions in Our Certificate of Incorporation and Delaware Law May Prevent a Change in Control

Some provisions of our certificate of incorporation may discourage a third party from seeking to gain control of us. For example, the ownership limitations described in our certificate of incorporation could have the effect of delaying, deferring, or limiting a change of control in which holders of our common stock might receive a premium for their shares over the then prevailing market price. The following is a summary of provisions of our certificate of incorporation that may have this effect.

The Ownership Limit. In order for us to maintain our qualification as a REIT, not more than 50% of the value of our outstanding shares of capital stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code. For the purpose of preserving our REIT qualification, our certificate of incorporation prohibits ownership, either directly or under the applicable attribution rules of the Internal Revenue Code, of more than 5% of the lesser of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding or the value of the outstanding shares of our common stock by any stockholder other than by some designated persons agreed to by us or as set forth in our certificate of incorporation (the “Ownership Limit”). The Ownership Limit may have the effect of discouraging an acquisition of control of us without the approval of our board of directors.

The Ownership Limit in our certificate of incorporation also restricts the transfer of our common stock. For example, any transfer of our equity is null and void if the transfer would:

•	result in any person owning, directly or indirectly, equity in excess of the Ownership Limit;
•	result in our equity being owned, directly or indirectly, by fewer than 100 persons;
•	result in us being “closely held” (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code);
•	result in us failing to qualify as a “domestically controlled REIT” (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code); or
•	otherwise cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT.

The Preferred Stock. Our certificate of incorporation authorizes our board of directors to issue up to 75 million shares of preferred stock. Upon issuance, our board of directors will establish the preferences and rights for this preferred stock. These preferences and rights may include the right to elect additional directors. The issuance of preferred stock could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of us even if a change in control were in our stockholders’ best interests.

Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law generally prohibits us from engaging in business transactions with a person or entity that owns 15% or more of our voting stock for a period of three years following the time such person or entity became an “interested stockholder” unless, prior to such time, our board of directors approved either the business combination or the transaction which resulted in such person or entity becoming an interested stockholder. A business transaction may include mergers, asset sales and other transactions resulting in financial benefit to the person or entity that owns 15% or more of our voting stock.

Table of Contents

If in any taxable year we fail to qualify as a REIT:

•	we would be subject to federal and state income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates of approximately 39%;
•	we would not be allowed to deduct dividends to stockholders in computing our taxable income; and
•	unless we were entitled to relief under the Internal Revenue Code, we would also be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which we lost qualification.

If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we might need to borrow funds or liquidate some investments in order to pay the additional tax liability. Accordingly, funds available for investment or dividends to our stockholders would be reduced for each of the years involved.

Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code to our operations and the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control. There are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations of these provisions. Although we operate in a manner consistent with the REIT qualification rules, there cannot be any assurance that we are or will remain so qualified.

In addition, the rules dealing with federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the Internal Revenue Service and the United States Department of the Treasury. Changes to the tax law could adversely affect our stockholders. We cannot predict with certainty whether, when, in what forms, or with what effective dates, the tax laws applicable to us or our stockholders may be changed.

    Our Timberlands and Manufacturing Facilities Are Subject to Federal and State Environmental Regulations

We are subject to regulation under, among other laws, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, the National Environmental Policy Act, and the Endangered Species Act, as well as similar state laws and regulations. Violations of various statutory and regulatory programs that apply to our operations could result in civil penalties, remediation expenses, potential injunctions, cease and desist orders and criminal penalties. We engage in the following activities that are subject to regulation:

•	forestry activities, including harvesting, planting and road building, use and maintenance;
•	the generation of air emissions;
•	the discharge of industrial wastewater and storm water; and
•	the generation and disposal of both hazardous and non-hazardous wastes.

Laws and regulations protecting the environment have generally become more stringent in recent years and could become more stringent in the future. Some environmental statutes impose strict liability, rendering a person liable for environmental damage without regard to the person’s negligence or fault. These laws or future legislation or administrative or judicial action with respect to protection of the environment may adversely affect our business.

The Endangered Species Act and similar state laws protect species threatened with possible extinction. A number of species on our timberlands have been and in the future may be protected under these laws, including the northern spotted owl, marbled murrelet, gray wolf, grizzly bear, mountain caribou, bald eagle, Karner blue butterfly, red-cockaded woodpecker, bull trout, and various salmon species. Protection of threatened and endangered species may include restrictions on timber harvesting, road building and other forest practices on private, federal and state land containing the affected species.

Table of Contents

Matters Pertaining to Arthur Andersen

Arthur Andersen served as the independent certified public accountant for The Timber Company prior to The Timber Company’s October 6, 2001 merger with Plum Creek. Because the merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition, the historical financial statements of The Timber Company are now the historical financial statements of Plum Creek. Although Plum Creek did not engage Arthur Andersen as its certified public accountant following the merger, Plum Creek’s periodic financial statements filed with the SEC include The Timber Company’s historical financial statements, which were audited by Arthur Andersen.

On March 14, 2002, Arthur Andersen was indicted on federal obstruction of justice charges arising from the government’s investigation of Enron. On June 15, 2002, Arthur Andersen was found guilty of obstruction of justice. As a result of this conviction, Arthur Andersen ceased practicing before the SEC in August of 2002. The SEC has provided regulatory relief designed to allow companies that file reports with the SEC to dispense with the filing of a consent or report of Arthur Andersen in certain circumstances. Notwithstanding the SEC’s regulatory relief, the inability of Arthur Andersen to provide a consent or report could negatively affect Plum Creek’s ability to access the capital markets.

Tax Risk Factors

We and Georgia-Pacific sought a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service to the effect that neither Georgia-Pacific nor the holders of Timber Company Stock would recognize gain for federal income tax purposes with respect to Georgia-Pacific’s redemption of each outstanding share of Timber Company Stock.

The Internal Revenue Service exercised its discretion not to issue the ruling on the basis that the evidence proffered in support of the business purposes for the redemption did not meet the high standard that the published procedures of the Internal Revenue Service require taxpayers to satisfy in order to receive favorable rulings. As a result, we and Georgia-Pacific received opinions from our respective tax counsel that the redemption would be tax-free under section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code. These opinions, however, are not binding on the Internal Revenue Service. If, for any reason, the redemption was not eligible for treatment under section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code, Georgia-Pacific would recognize gain on the redemption and we would generally be responsible for 50% of such liability in excess of the proceeds of the insurance policies obtained by The Timber Company to cover a portion of such exposure.

On September 13, 2002, Georgia-Pacific entered into a Closing Agreement with the Internal Revenue Service completing a pre-filing review of Georgia-Pacific’s federal income tax reporting of the redemption of Timber Company Stock. Under the terms of the Closing Agreement, the Internal Revenue Service agreed that neither Georgia-Pacific nor the former holders of Timber Company Stock would recognize a gain or loss as a result of the redemption of Timber Company Stock. Georgia-Pacific and we believe that the Closing Agreement is conclusive with respect to the most material tax consequences associated with Georgia-Pacific’s redemption of Timber Company Stock, except as described below with respect to section 355(e) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Closing Agreement between Georgia-Pacific and the Internal Revenue Service regarding Georgia-Pacific’s redemption of Timber Company Stock is based on facts that were in existence on the date of redemption. Georgia-Pacific may be subject to tax under section 355(e) of the Internal Revenue Code if acquisitions or issuances of our stock following the merger cause the former holders of Timber Company Stock to own less than a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock. In particular, section 355(e) of the Internal Revenue Code will apply if such issuances or acquisitions occur as part of a plan or series of related transactions that include the redemption. For this purpose, any acquisitions or issuances of our stock before October 2003 are presumed to be part of such a plan, although we and Georgia-Pacific may be able to rebut that presumption. If such an issuance or acquisition of

Table of Contents

Because of the change in control limitation imposed by section 355(e) of the Internal Revenue Code, we may be limited in the amount of stock that we can issue to make acquisitions or to raise additional capital until October 2003. Also, our indemnity obligation to Georgia-Pacific might discourage, delay or prevent a change of control that our stockholders may consider favorable.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Approximately $1.2 billion of the long-term debt of the company bears interest at fixed rates, and therefore the fair value of these instruments is affected by changes in market interest rates. The following table presents principal cash flows (in millions) based upon maturity dates of the debt obligations and the related weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates for the fixed rate debt. The interest rate on the variable rate debt as of December 31, 2002, was LIBOR plus 1.5% which includes facility fees (3.6%), however, this rate could range from LIBOR plus 0.75% to LIBOR plus 1.75% depending on our financial results.

Table of Contents

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

PLUM CREEK TIMBER COMPANY, INC.

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Table of Contents

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Table of Contents