FIBERMARK INC - 10-Q Quarterly Report

FIBERMARK, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Unaudited

		2003			2002

Net sales	$	93,651		$	97,594

Cost of sales		81,320			77,550

Gross profit		12,331			20,044

Selling, general and administrative expenses		9,805			8,745
Restructuring charge		1,682			-
Goodwill impairment		92,261			-

Income (loss) from operations		(91,417	)		11,299

Other expense, net		574			322

Interest expense, net		8,723			8,470

Income (loss) before income taxes		(100,714	)		2,507

Income tax expense		2,223			1,364

Net income (loss)	$	(102,937	)	$	1,143

Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	(14.57	)	$	0.16

Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	(14.57	)	$	0.16

Average basic shares outstanding		7,066			7,066
Average diluted shares outstanding		7,066			7,093

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

FIBERMARK, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Unaudited


		2003			2002


Net sales	$	302,493		$	299,876

Cost of sales		255,208			237,419

Gross profit		47,285			62,457

Selling, general and administrative expenses		32,871			27,540
Restructuring charge		1,682			-
Goodwill impairment		92,261			-

Income (loss) from operations		(79,529	)		34,917

Other expense, net		835			1,065

Interest expense, net		26,196			25,985

Income (loss) before income taxes		(106,560	)		7,867

Income tax expense		10,296			3,774

Net income (loss)	$	(116,856	)	$	4,093

Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	(16.54	)	$	0.58

Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	(16.54	)	$	0.58

Average basic shares outstanding		7,066			7,008
Average diluted shares outstanding		7,066			7,046

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

FIBERMARK, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

		Unaudited
		September 30,			December 31,
ASSETS		2003			2002

Current assets:
Cash	$	20,787		$	35,567
Accounts receivable, net of allowances		52,709			50,386
Inventories		60,592			64,569
Prepaid expenses		1,791			1,591

Total current assets		135,879			152,113

Property, plant and equipment, net		238,138			225,506
Goodwill		7,713			98,460
Other intangible assets, net		10,381			11,478
Other long-term assets		1,434			1,347
Other pension assets		5,011			5,011

Total assets	$	398,556		$	493,915

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	4,481		$	3,188
Accounts payable		22,222			27,344
Accrued liabilities		36,524			22,461
Accrued income taxes payable		7,794			4,330
Deferred income taxes		573			538

Total current liabilities		71,594			57,861

Long-term liabilities:
Revolving credit line		-			-
Long-term debt, less current portion		341,382			341,073
Deferred income taxes		16,026			14,952
Other long-term liabilities		44,586			43,800

Total long-term liabilities		401,994			399,825

Total liabilities		473,588			457,686

Stockholders' equity (deficit)
Preferred stock, par value $.001 per share;
2,000,000 shares authorized, and none issued		-			-
Series A Junior participatory preferred stock, par value $.001;
7,066 shares authorized, and none issued		-			-
Common stock, par value $.001 per share; 20,000,000 shares authorized
7,070,026 and 7,066,226 shares issued and outstanding in 2003 and 2002		7			7
Additional paid-in capital		65,496			65,496
Accumulated deficit		(146,797	)		(29,931	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		6,297			692
Less treasury stock, 3,800 shares at cost in 2003 and 2002		(35	)		(35	)

Total stockholders' equity (deficit)		(75,032	)		36,229

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)	$	398,556		$	493,915

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

FIBERMARK, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended Sept 30, 2003 and 2002

(In thousands)

Unaudited

		2003			2002

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(116,856	)	$	4,093
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		12,246			10,782
Amortization of bond discount		129			-
Amortization of deferred gain		(222	)		-
Goodwill impairment		92,261			-
Deferred income taxes		125			8,326
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(1,407	)		(1,336	)
Inventories		5,148			288
Prepaid expenses		(175	)		-
Other		(2	)		(227	)
Accounts payable		(5,831	)		(2,757	)
Accrued pension and other liabilities		13,768			6,119
Accrued income taxes payable		2,953			1,745
Other long-term liabilities		(273	)		390

Net cash provided by operating activities		1,864			27,423

Cash flows used for investing activities:
Additions to property, plant and equipment		(18,969	)		(10,000	)
Increase in other intangible assets		-			(3,143	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(18,969	)		(13,143	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of debt		5,595			1,938
Net payments under revolving credit line		-			(93	)
Repayment of debt		(4,122	)		(1,234	)
Net proceeds from exercise of stock options		-			542

Net cash provided by financing activities		1,473			1,153

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		852			3,267

Net increase (decrease) in cash		(14,780	)		18,700

Cash at beginning of period		35,567			23,266

Cash at end of period	$	20,787		$	41,966

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

FIBERMARK, INC. 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

September 30, 2003 and 2002 

(Unaudited) 

1.    Basis of Presentation 

In the opinion of management the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items, necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position and the consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods. 

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted. These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2002, included in the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

2.    Changes in Accounting Principles and Recently Issued Standards 

On January 1, 2003, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations ("SFAS No. 143"). SFAS No. 143 applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset that result from the acquisition, construction, or development and (or) the normal operation of a long-lived asset. Adoption of SFAS No. 143 did not have a material impact on our financial statements. 

On January 1, 2003, we also adopted SFAS No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of SFAS No. 13, and Technical Corrections ("SFAS No. 145"). SFAS No. 145 rescinds SFAS No. 4, Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishments of Debt , and an amendment of that Statement, SFAS No. 64, Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements . The pronouncement also rescinds SFAS No. 44, Accounting for Intangible Assets of Motor Carriers and amends SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases , to eliminate an inconsistency between the required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. SFAS No. 145 had the effect of reclassifying the loss 
on early extinguishment of debt recorded in 2001 from an extraordinary item to other expense. 

On January 1, 2003, we adopted SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. SFAS No. 146 requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit (including restructuring) or disposal activities at fair value when the related liability is incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan as under previous practice. Costs covered by the standard include certain contract termination costs, certain employee termination benefits and other costs to consolidate or close facilities and relocate employees that are associated wit
h an exit activity or disposal of long-lived assets. The requirements of SFAS No. 146 are effective prospectively for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. Exit activity during the third quarter of 2003 was accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 146. 

On July 1, 2003, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN 46"), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities , an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements , which addresses consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities, having certain characteristics. FIN 46 applies to variable interest entities created after Janua
ry 31, 2003, and to variable interest entities in which an enterprise obtains an interest after that date. Adoption of FIN 46 did not have a material impact on our financial statements. 

We have reviewed all recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements and do not believe any such pronouncements will have a material impact on our financial statements. 

3.         Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share 

The reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share computations for the company's reported net income (loss) follows (in thousands, except share and per share amounts): 

	Three Months Ended (Unaudited) September 30,					Nine Months Ended (Unaudited) September 30,

		2003			2002		2003			2002

Numerator:
Income (loss) available to common shareholders used in basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share		$ (102,937	)		$ 1,143		$ (116,856	)		$ 4,093

Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings (loss) per share:
Weighted average shares		7,066,226			7,066,226		7,066,226			7,007,796

Effect of dilutive securities:
Fixed stock options		*			26,826		*			38,231

Denominator for diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Adjusted weighted average shares		7,066,226			7,093,052		7,066,226			7,046,027

Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	(14.57	)	$	0.16	$	(16.54	)	$	0.58

Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	(14.57	)	$	0.16	$	(16.54	)	$	0.58

* The average closing stock price of our common stock during the third quarter ended September 30, 2003, was less than the exercise price on all options outstanding during the period. Therefore, there were no incremental shares to be considered in the diluted earnings (loss) per share calculation for the three months ended September 30, 2003. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, 176 incremental shares are not included because the effect would be antidilutive. Additionally, in both the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2003, the effect of dilutive securities is not presented as the company incurred net losses. 

4.   Stock-Based Compensation 

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure , amends Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation , to provide alternative methods of transition for an entity that voluntarily changes to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensatio
n. It also amends the disclosure provisions of that Statement to require prominent disclosure about the effects on reported net income (loss) of an entity’s accounting policy decisions with respect to stock-based employee compensation. The company has chosen to continue to account for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees , and related interpretations. Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the company’s stock at the date of the grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. 

No compensation expense has been recognized for stock options granted under the plans during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, as any options granted were at exercise prices that equaled the market value at the date of the grant. Had compensation expense for the company’s stock option awards been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for awards granted after 1994 consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, the company’s net income (loss) would have been reduced to the pro forma amo
unts indicated below (in thousands, except per share amounts): 

	Three Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,

	2003	2002	2003	2002

Net income (loss), as reported	$ (102,937)	$ 1, 143	$ (116,856)	$ 4093
Total stock based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value method	(161)	(316)	(478)	(950)
Net income (loss), pro forma	$ (103,098)	$ 827	$ (117,334)	$ 3, 143

Basic earnings (loss) per share, as reported	$ (14.57)	$ 0.16	$ (16.54)	$ 0.58
Basic earnings (loss) per share, pro forma	$ (14.59)	$ 0.12	$ (16.61)	$ 0.45

Diluted earnings (loss) per share, as reported	$ (14.57)	$ 0.16	$ (16.54)	$ 0.58
Diluted earnings (loss) per share, pro forma	$ (14.59)	$ 0.12	$ (16.61)	$ 0.45

Pro forma amounts reflect only options granted after 1994. Therefore, the full impact of calculating compensation cost for stock options under SFAS No. 123 is not reflected in the pro forma amounts presented above because compensation cost is reflected over the options’ vesting periods and compensation cost for options granted prior to January 1, 1995, is not considered. 

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for any grants in 2003 and 2002: risk-free interest rate of 4.4%, dividend yield of $0, expected volatility of 45% and expected lives per the plan agreements. 

5.  Comprehensive Income (Loss) 

Comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, consists of net income (loss) and foreign currency translation adjustments as follows (in thousands): 

	Three Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2003	2002	2003	2002

Net income (loss)	$ (102,937)	$ 1,143	$ (116,856)	$ 4,093
Currency translation adjustment	(2,599)	138	5,605	9,729
Comprehensive income (loss)	$ (105,536)	$ 1,281	$ (111,251)	$ 13,822

6.   Inventories 

Inventories at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, consisted of the following (in thousands): 

	September 30, 2003	December 31, 2002

Raw material	$ 20,820	$ 20,671
Work in progress	17,085	19,548
Finished goods	14,280	14,975
Finished goods on consignment	3,311	4,090
Stores inventory	3,745	3,562
Operating supplies	1,351	1,723

Total inventories	$ 60,592	$ 64,569

7.    Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets 

Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets ("SFAS 142"). Under SFAS 142, we no longer amortize goodwill and intangibles that have indefinite lives. SFAS 142 also requires that we assess goodwill and intangibles with indefinite lives for impairment at least annually, based on the fair value of the related reporting unit or intangible asset. Our annual impairment assessment is performed in the third quarter of each year, based on information as of September 30. The considerations that we evaluated incl
uded continued weakness in demand for our North American segment products, as well as delayed implementation of previously announced facility consolidations and the delayed realization of related improvements. 

Based on a fair market value determination reflecting the present value of our projected future cash flows and the carrying value of our property, plant and equipment and intellectual property, including proprietary technology, we wrote down the goodwill in our North American operations segment by $92.3 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2003. 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, goodwill had been previously reduced by $7,000 as a result of adjusting the severance accrual recorded in connection with the acquisition of DSI. All other changes in goodwill during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2003 were due to changes in foreign currency. 

The following table provides the gross carrying value and accumulated amortization for each major class of other intangible assets as of September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 (in thousands): 

	Gross Carrying Value				Accumulated Amortization

		Sept. 30, 2003		Dec. 31, 2002		Sept. 30, 2003		Dec. 31, 2002

Amortizable intangible assets:
Debt issue costs	$	14,504	$	14,467	$	5,821	$	4,875
Acquired technology		846		846		32		--
Other		1,396		1,409		512		369

Total amortizable intangible assets	$	16,746	$	16,722	$	6,366	$	5,244

The total intangible amortization expense for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 was $436,000 and $433,000, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 was $1,308,000 and $1,273,000. The estimated amortization expense for each of the next five years ending December 31, is as follows (in thousands):

2003	$1,744
2004	$1,744
2005	$1,707
2006	$1,507
2007	$1,063

8. Segment Information:

  The following table categorizes net sales in each product family into the appropriate operating segment (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2003						Three Months Ended September 30, 2002

	Operating Segments						Operating Segments

	German		North American				German		North American
	Operations		Operations		Total		Operations		Operations		Total

Net sales
Product Family
Office products	$	-	$	18,797	$	18,797	$	-	$	20,356	$	20,356
Publishing and packaging		-		21,422		21,422		-		23,582		23,582
Technical specialties		42,120		11,312		53,432		37,672		15,984		53,656

	$	42,120	$	51,531	$	93,651	$	37,672	$	59,922	$	97,594

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003						Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002

	Operating Segments						Operating Segments

	German		North American				German		North American
	Operations		Operations		Total		Operations		Operations		Total

Net sales
Product Family
Office products	$	-	$	55,985	$	55,985	$	-	$	61,932	$	61,932
Publishing and packaging		-		69,240		69,240		-		77,314		77,314
Technical specialties		138,346		38,922		177,268		112,333		48,297		160,630

	$	138,346	$	164,147	$	302,493	$	112,333	$	187,543	$	299,876

8. Segment Information:

The following table presents selected financial data for each of our operating segments for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002.

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2003								Three Months Ended September 30, 2002

	Operating Segments								Operating Segments

	German		North American						German		North American
	Operations		Operations			Total			Operations		Operations		Total

Total sales	$	42,120	$	52,122		$	94,242		$	37,672	$	59,922	$	97,594
Less: inter-segment net sales		-		(591	)		(591	)		-		-		-

Total net sales	$	42,120	$	51,531		$	93,651		$	37,672	$	59,922	$	97,594
Income (loss) from operations	$	4,745	$	(96,162	)	$	(91,417	)	$	5,407	$	5,892	$	11,299
Depreciation and amortization	$	1,110	$	2,735		$	3,845		$	928	$	2,714	$	3,642

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003								Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002

	Operating Segments								Operating Segments

	German		North American						German		North American
	Operations		Operations				Total		Operations		Operations		Total

Total sales	$	138,346	$	165,748		$	304,094		$	112,333	$	187,543	$	299,876
Less: inter-segment net sales		-		(1,601	)		(1,601	)		-		-		-

Total net sales	$	138,346	$	164,147		$	302,493		$	112,333	$	187,543	$	299,876
Income (loss) from operations	$	22,105	$	(101,634	)	$	(79,529	)	$	19,015	$	15,902	$	34,917
Depreciation and amortization	$	3,321	$	8,925		$	12,246		$	2,589	$	8,193	$	10,782

The following table presents selected financial data for each of our operating segments at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 (in thousands).

	September 30, 2003				December 31, 2002

	Operating Segments				Operating Segments

	German	North American			German	North American
	Operations	Operations	Eliminations	Total	Operations	Operations	Eliminations	Total

Total assets	$ 158,232	$ 332,582	$ (92,258)	$ 398,556	$ 149,642	$ 434,793	$ (90,520)	$ 493,915

9.    Restructuring Expense 

On July 22, 2003, the company eliminated approximately 100 positions in its North American operations and recorded a charge for severance expenses of $1.7 million in the third quarter. The employees affected were all terminated within 60 days of the announcement date. However, severance payments will continue into the third quarter of 2004. 

The following table reconciles the restructuring liability from the beginning to the end of the quarter. 

(In thousands): 

	Balance 6/30/03	Expense	Paid	Balance 9/30/03

Severance costs	$ 0	$ 1,682	$ (325)	$ 1,357

10.  Subsequent Event 

On September 30, 2003, the company had a $60.0 million revolving credit facility that was due to expire on September 30, 2005 (the "former credit facility"). A new, 30 month, $85.0 million credit facility was signed on November 12, 2003 which provides a significant increase in cash availability for capital expenditures, working capital and general corporate purposes. The former credit facility was paid off on November 12, 2003, and replaced with the new credit facility. The new credit facility led by GE Capital is secured by substantially all of FiberMark’s U.S. assets, excluding various equipment at our Quakertown, Pennsylvania and Warren Glen, New Jersey facilities that secure two existing term loans, and is also secured by specific foreign assets. The new credit facility also pro
vides borrowing capacity based on the level of profitability as defined by earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) of FiberMark’s German businesses. To secure these European borrowings, the company has pledged various percentages of the ownership shares of the German operations that effectively prevent FiberMark from disposing of or materially changing the assets of those businesses without consent from the new credit facility lender. 

The following chart compares the unused borrowing capacity of the expiring facility (that was in effect at September 30, 2003) and the pro-forma estimated unused borrowing capacity under the new credit facility. All figures are in millions. 

As of September 30, 2003	Former Credit Facility	New Credit Facility Proforma

North American borrowing base	42.1	23.7

German borrowing base	-0-	40.0

Total borrowing base	42.1	63.7

Less: reserves against availability	(15.2)	(4.8)

Net availability	26.9	58.9

Less: outstanding borrowings	-0-	-0-

Letters of credit	(6.1)	(7.1)

Capital expenditure subfacility	8.0	NA

Unused borrowing capacity	28.8	51.8

As of September 30, 2003, our pro-forma unused borrowing capacity under the new credit facility was $51.8 million based on estimates made by management compared with $28.8 million on the former credit facility and capital expenditure sub-facility. On September 30, 2003, we had a total of $8.1 million in use under the expiring facility, comprising $6.1 million of outstanding letters of credit and $2.0 million under the capital expansion sub-facility. Under the new facility, we issued a $1.0 million letter of credit to secure an existing term loan. This letter of credit is reflected in the pro-forma calculation above. The new credit facility was used to close out the former credit facility and sub-facility, as well as to pay related transaction costs of approximately $3.0 million.

Advances under the new credit facility are repayable daily. The borrowing rate is determined at the company’s discretion based on the terms of the new credit facility.

Borrowing Source	Base Rate Index	Former Credit Facility Margin Over Index	New Credit Facility Margin over index

U.S.	LIBOR	2.00%	3.00%

U.S.	Prime rate	0.50%	1.50%

Europe	Euribor	NA	3.00%

Europe	Euro Index	NA	4.50%

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 

Three Months Ended September 30, 2003, Compared with Three Months Ended September 30, 2002

For the three months ended September 30, 2003, net sales were $93.7 million compared with $97.6 million in the third quarter of 2002, a decline of 4%.

Net sales from our German operations increased by 12% to $42.1 million in the third quarter of 2003 from $37.7 million in the comparable 2002 period. The $4.4 million increase was caused by a $5.3 million increase in net sales attributable to the effects of a stronger euro, partially offset by slightly lower sales volume in local currency in the third quarter of 2003 compared with the third quarter of 2002. This decrease in net sales also included the effects of an extended shutdown for equipment upgrades to increase capacity for European transportation filter media. We estimate that the shutdown reduced third quarter sales by approximately $1.5 million. The plant improvements are expected to increase our capacity to sell automotive filter media by approximately 15%.

Sales from our North American operating segment were $51.5 million in the third quarter of 2003, a 14% decline from $59.9 million during the third quarter of 2002. This decline was primarily due to continued weakness in demand for our products, and to a lesser degree, by the December 2002 sale of our North American industrial filter media business (accounting for $1.1 million of the decline). 

Technical specialties sales in North America decreased by 29% to $11.3 million in the third quarter of 2003 compared with $16.0 million in the third quarter of 2002. The decrease in technical specialties sales reflects discontinued product lines (including the sale in December 2002 of our industrial filter media business which reduced sales by $1.1 million in the three month period) and the effects of weak industrial markets and product obsolescence. 

Sales of publishing and packaging products were $21.4 million in the third quarter of 2003 compared with $23.6 million in the third quarter of 2002, a 9% decline. This decrease is primarily due to weakness in book publishing and some substitution of lower cost cover materials. 

Office products sales were $18.8 million in the third quarter of 2003 compared with $20.4 million in the third quarter of 2002, a decline of 8%. This decline reflects continued industry weakness as well as substitution by customers of lower value products from FiberMark, as well as lower quality competitive products. 

Gross profit for the third quarter of 2003 was $12.3 million, or 13% of sales, compared with $20.0 million, or 20% of sales, in the third quarter of 2002. The $7.7 million decrease in gross profit was primarily due to lower sales volume, higher benefit costs, other fixed manufacturing overhead costs at operating facilities, and higher energy costs. These higher costs were partially offset by the impact of favorable exchange rates, marginally lower pulp costs, and lower fixed costs attributable to earlier facility consolidations. 

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the third quarter of 2003 were $9.8 million or 10% of sales, compared with $8.7 million or 9% of sales in the third quarter of 2002. Approximately $0.3 million of the increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was attributable to the effects of a stronger euro in the third quarter of 2003 compared with the third quarter of 2002. The remainder of the increase was primarily attributable to higher professional fees associated with various projects. 

The company recorded a $1.7 million restructuring charge in the third quarter of 2003 related to staff reductions of approximately 100 positions, as announced in July 2003. The charge covered severance expenses for employees terminated within 60 days of the announcement and that will be substantially paid by the first quarter of 2004. 

A goodwill impairment charge of $92.3 million was recorded in the third quarter of 2003 related to the carrying value of goodwill in the North American operating segment as required under SFAS 142. Based on the current and projected financial performance of our North American operations and an independent appraisal of the fair market value of our assets and liabilities, the carrying value of goodwill for all acquired entities located in North America was reduced to zero. 

During the third quarter of 2003, we realized a loss of $91.4 million from operations, compared with income of $11.3 million in the third quarter of 2002, or 12% of sales. In our German operations segment, income from operations decreased by $0.7 million to $4.7 million, or 11% of sales, from $5.4 million, or 14% of sales in the third quarter of 2002. This decrease was primarily due to lower volume due to downtime taken to install capital equipment to increase capacity, and temporary inefficiencies related to the post-installation startup that have been subsequently resolved, higher maintenance costs and higher energy costs. These costs were offset by $1.3 million of beneficial effects of a stronger euro in the third quarter of 2003 compared with the third quarter of 2002. In our North Am
erican operations segment we incurred a loss from operations of $96.2 million in the third quarter of 2003 compared with income from operations of $5.9 million in the third quarter of 2002. The change from 2002 was primarily attributable to the goodwill impairment charge of $92.3 million, lower sales volumes, higher benefit expenses and other fixed manufacturing overhead costs, higher selling, general and administrative expenses largely due to higher professional fees, and higher energy costs. 

Net interest expense was $8.7 million in the third quarter of 2003 compared with $8.5 million in the third quarter of 2002. The increase in net interest expense was primarily due to lower interest income in Germany. 

Income tax expense was $2.2 million in the third quarter of 2003 compared with $1.4 million in 2002. Substantially all of the income taxes relate to German operations. The company fully reserves against tax benefits on U.S. net operating losses in the near term until operating results indicate sustainable profitability. Approximately $5.4 million of the third quarter loss was due to an increase in the valuation allowance for deferred income taxes, reflecting a 100% allowance on net operating loss carry-forwards generated by the company’s U.S. operations during the quarter. The company did record tax benefits on U.S. operating losses during 2002. 

For the reasons described above, the net loss for the third quarter of 2003 was $102.9 million, or $14.57 per share, compared with net income of $1.1 million, or $0.16 per share, in the third quarter of 2002. 

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003, Compared with Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 

Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 were $302.5 million compared with $299.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, an increase of 1%. 

Net sales from our German operations segment increased 23% to $138.3 million in the first nine months of 2003 from $112.3 million in the first nine months of 2002. Of the $26.0 million increase, approximately $22.7 million of the increase in net sales was attributable to the effects of a stronger euro in the first nine months of 2003 compared with the same period in 2002. This increase in net sales also included higher sales of automotive filter media, tape base and nonwoven wallcoverings. 

Sales from our North American operations segment decreased $23.4 million, or 12%, to $164.1 million during the first nine months of 2003 from $187.5 million in the first nine months of 2002. The decrease in net sales was primarily due to weak demand and the sale of our North American industrial filter media business in December 2002 (accounting for $2.8 million of the decrease in the nine month period). 

Technical specialties sales from our North American operations segment decreased by $9.4 million, or 19%, to $38.9 million in the first nine months of 2003 from $48.3 million in the first nine months of 2002. The decrease in sales of technical specialties products reflects the discontinuation of product lines (including the sale of our industrial filter media business in December 2002), weak industrial markets and product obsolescence. 

Sales of publishing and packaging grades were $69.2 million in the first nine months of 2003 compared with $77.3 million in the first nine months of 2002, a decline of 10%. The decline was primarily attributable to lower sales to the elementary and high school textbook publishing industry resulting from tight state budgets and product downgrading in other book markets. 

Office products sales declined $5.9 million, or 10%, to $56.0 million in the first nine months 2003 from $61.9 million in the first nine months of 2002. The decrease was primarily due to continued industry weakness, pricing pressures and downgrading by customers to lower cost FiberMark products, as well as customer substitution of lower quality competitive products. 

Gross profit for the first nine months of 2003 was $47.3 million, or 16% of sales, compared with $62.5 million, or 21% of sales, in the first nine months of 2002. The $15.2 million decrease in gross profit was primarily attributable to lower sales volume, higher fixed manufacturing overhead costs at open facilities including benefit costs, higher pulp and energy costs and costs incurred in connection with the transfer of production from our Johnston, Rhode Island, facility to our Lowville, New York facility. 

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the first nine months of 2003 were $32.9 million or 11% of sales, compared with $27.5 million or 9% of sales in the first nine months of 2002. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily attributable to the effects of a stronger euro, an increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts and higher professional fees associated with a variety of projects in the first nine months of 2003 compared with the first nine months of 2002. 

The company recorded a $1.7 million pre-tax severance charge in the third quarter of 2003 related to staff reductions of approximately 100 positions. The charge covered severance expenses for employees terminated within 60 days of the announcement. 

A goodwill impairment charge of $92.3 million was recorded in the third quarter of 2003 related to the carrying value of goodwill in the North American operating segment as required under SFAS 142. Based on the current and projected financial performance of our North American operations and an independent appraisal of the fair market value of our assets and liabilities, the carrying value of goodwill for all acquired entities located in North America was reduced to zero. 

In the first nine months of 2003, we generated a loss of $79.5 million from operations compared with income of $34.9 million in the first nine months of 2002. In our German operations segment, income from operations increased by $3.1 million, or 16%, to $22.1 million in the first nine months of 2003 from $19.0 million in 2002. This increase was primarily due to a stronger euro in 2003 and higher volume, partially offset by higher pulp prices and maintenance costs. In our North American operations segment we incurred a loss from operations of $101.6 million in the first nine months of 2003 compared with income from operations of $15.9 million in the first nine months of 2002. The change from 2002 was primarily due to the goodwill impairment charge, lower sales volume, a shift in sale
s mix towards lower priced and lower margin products, higher fixed manufacturing overhead costs at open facilities, higher pulp and energy costs, and higher selling, general and administrative expenses. 

Net interest expense was $26.2 million in the first nine months of 2003 and $26.0 million in the first nine months of 2002. 

Income tax expense was $10.3 million in the first nine months of 2003 compared with $3.8 million in the first nine months of 2002. Substantially all of the income taxes relate to German operations. FiberMark management determined that it was more likely than not that deferred tax benefits arising from pre-tax losses incurred in North American operations would not be realized. The tax benefit of losses in the first nine months of 2003 would have been $14.9 million if the company were able to realize these benefits. The company can no longer recognize tax benefits on net operating losses in the near term until sustainable profits are generated. 

During the quarter ended September 30, 2003, the company commenced an organizational restructuring of its international legal entities to achieve administrative efficiencies. The reorganization closed on October 31, 2003. One of the potential effects will be to lower the taxes on income earned outside of the U.S., potentially reducing our effective tax rates in Germany to a range from 30% to 35% compared to the current blended rate of 44.5%. Pending legislative changes in Germany could cause these rates to increase in the future. There was no impact on tax expense in the third quarter of 2003. 

For the reasons described above, the net loss for the first nine months of 2003 was $116.9 million, or $16.54 per share, compared with net income of $4.1 million, or $0.58 per share, in the first nine months of 2002. 

Liquidity and Capital Resources 

As of September 30, 2003, we had outstanding $100.0 million of senior notes, which mature on October 15, 2006, are non-amortizing and carry a fixed interest rate of 9.375%. Also outstanding at September 30, 2003 were $230.0 million of senior notes issued in conjunction with the DSI acquisition. These notes, which mature on April 15, 2011, are also non-amortizing, were issued at a discounted price of $228.3 million and carry a fixed interest rate of 10.75%. 

On September 30, 2003, the company had a $60.0 million revolving credit facility that was due to expire on September 30, 2005 (the "former credit facility"). A new, 30 month, $85.0 million credit facility was signed on November 12, 2003 which provides a significant increase in cash availability for capital expenditures, working capital and general corporate purposes. The former credit facility was paid off on November 12, 2003, and replaced with the new credit facility. The new credit facility led by GE Capital is secured by substantially all of FiberMark’s U.S. assets, excluding various equipment at our Quakertown, Pennsylvania and Warren Glen, New Jersey facilities that secure two existing term loans, and is also secured by specific foreign assets. The new credit facility also prov
ides borrowing capacity based on the level of profitability as defined by earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) of FiberMark’s German businesses. To secure these European borrowings, the company has pledged various percentages of the ownership shares of the German operations that effectively prevent FiberMark from disposing of or materially changing the assets of those businesses without consent from the new credit facility lender. 

The following chart compares the unused borrowing capacity of the expiring facility (that was in effect at September 30, 2003) and the pro-forma estimated unused borrowing capacity under the new credit facility. All figures are in millions. 

As of September 30, 2003	Former Credit Facility	New Credit Facility

North American borrowing base	42.1	23.7

German borrowing base	NA	40.0

Total borrowing base	42.1	63.7

Less: reserves against availability	(15.2)	(4.8)

Net availability	26.9	58.9

Less: outstanding borrowings	-0-	-0-

Letters of credit	(6.1)	(7.1)

Capital expenditure sub-facility	8.0	NA

Unused borrowing capacity	20.8	51.8

As of September 30, 2003, our pro-forma unused borrowing capacity under the new credit facility, was $51.8 million based on estimates made by management compared with $28.8 million on the former credit facility and capital expenditure sub-facility. On September 30, 2003, we had a total of $8.1 million outstanding under the expiring facility comprising $6.1 million of outstanding letters of credit and $2.0 million under the capital expansion sub-facility. Under the new facility, we issued a $1.0 million letter of credit to secure an existing term loan. This letter of credit is reflected in the pro-forma calculation above. The new credit facility was used to pay off the former credit facility, as well as related transaction costs of approximately $3.0 million.

Advances under the new credit facility are repayable daily. The borrowing rate is determined at the company’s discretion based on the terms of the new credit facility.

Borrowing Source	Base Rate Index	Former Credit Facility Margin Over Index	New Credit Facility Margin over index

U.S.	LIBOR	2.00%	3.00%

U.S.	Prime rate	0.50%	1.50%

Europe	Euribor	NA	3.00%

Europe	Euro Index	NA	4.50%

On September 30, 2003, $1.8 million was outstanding under a term loan secured by machinery at our Quakertown, Pennsylvania, facility. This loan bears interest at Libor plus 2.0% and is repayable in monthly installments through 2007. 

On September 30, 2003, $9.7 million was outstanding on a term loan secured by papermaking machinery at our Warren Glen, New Jersey, facility. The interest rate on this loan is 8.47% with the balance amortizing over seven years. 

In the fourth quarter of 2002, we entered into a sale-leaseback agreement involving our Lowville, New York facility. Under the sale-leaseback agreement, FiberMark paid $1.1 million representing 20% of the project cost in January 2003, and is obligated to make 24 monthly payments of $100,000 plus interest on the outstanding principal, followed by a balloon payment of approximately $2.1 million on January 31, 2005, when FiberMark will resume ownership of the entire site. At September 30, 2003, the balance outstanding on the capital lease was $3.7 million. 

The company’s historical requirements for capital have been primarily for servicing debt, capital expenditures and working capital. For the nine months ended September 30, cash flows provided by operating activities were $1.9 million in 2003 compared with cash flows provided by operating activities of $27.4 million in 2002. During these periods, additions to property, plant and equipment totaled $19.0 million in 2003 and $10.0 million in 2002.

The following table lists our contractual obligations due by period with initial or remaining terms in excess of one year at September 30, 2003 (in millions): 

	2003*	2004-2005	2006-2007	Thereafter	Total

Long-term debt	$ 1.0	$ 7.6	$ 104.9	$ 228.7	$ 342.2
Letters of credit	6.1	0.0	0.0	0.0	6.1
Operating leases	0.6	3.3	1.1	0.0	5.0
Sale-leaseback	0.3	3.4	0.0	0.0	3.7
Forward purchase contracts	2.3	3.8	0.0	0.0	6.1

	$ 10.3	$ 18.1	$ 106.0	$ 228.7	$ 363.1

*Three months ending December 31, 2003.

The majority of our forward purchase contracts relate to our natural gas purchases in the United States, obligating us to purchase a minimum quantity each month during the contract period. 

Management actions, including facility consolidations, the recent announcement of a reduction in our workforce and a comprehensive profit improvement program involving all of our businesses, are designed to improve cash flow from operating activities. The company expects to continue to prudently invest capital for high value projects. 

The company believes that cash flow from operations, plus existing cash balances and amounts that are available to us under the new credit facility will be sufficient to fund our capital requirements, debt service and working capital needs over the next 12 months. 

Inflation 

We attempt to minimize the effect of inflation on our earnings by controlling operating expenses. During the past several years, the rate of general inflation has been relatively low and has not had a significant impact on our results of operations. We purchase raw materials that are subject to cyclical changes in costs that may not reflect the rate of general inflation. 

Critical Accounting Policies 

The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reporting period. Differences from those estimates are recorded in the reporting period during which the difference becomes known. Estimates are used in accounting for, among other items, facility clos
ures, acquisitions, deferred tax assets, excess and obsolete inventory, allowances for doubtful accounts receivable, long-lived assets and pension benefit obligations. Those estimates which require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments are defined as critical and their accounting policies are described in further detail as follows: 

Facility Closures 

Among those factors affecting the accruals for facility closures are estimates of the number and types of employees that will be affected, the benefit costs related to those employees and the length of time until the operations can be consolidated within other facilities. Generally, we base our estimates on historical patterns of past facility closures, influenced by judgments about current market conditions. The adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, our estimates on historical patterns of past facility closures, influenced by judgments about current market conditions. The adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, will change the timing of recognition of costs associated with any future facility closures. 

Acquisitions 

We account for acquisitions under the purchase method which requires the purchase price to be allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their respective fair values. For the many significant assets we acquire, such as property, plant and equipment, we obtain third-party appraisals to determine the fair value of those assets. 

Income Taxes 

We are required to estimate income taxes in each of our operational jurisdictions. This process involves estimating the actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as property, plant and equipment, for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, for which we must then assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent that recovery is not likely, a valuation allowance must be established. Significant management judgment is required in determining the provision (benefit) for income taxes, defe
rred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets. During the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2003, we recorded valuation allowances of $5.4 million and $14.9 million, respectively, against our deferred tax assets because management determined that it was more likely than not that the deferred tax assets arising from the pretax loss incurred by our North American operations would not be realized. 

Impairment of Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets 

Long-lived assets are required to be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Facility closures have triggered such impairment reviews in the past. Property, plant and equipment to be disposed of as a result of facility closures are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Generally, the company bases its estimates on historical patterns, influenced by judgments about current market conditions. Goodwill and other intangibles are assessed for impairment annually in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 Statement of Financial Accounti
ng Standards No. 142 , Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets . 

We conducted our annual assessment of conducted our annual assessment of goodwill goodwill using using September 30, 2003 as a measurement date. . The 
considerations that we evaluated included continued weakness in demand for our North American segment products, as well as delayed implementation of previously announced facility consolidations and the delayed realization of related improvements. Based on a fair market value determination reflecting the present value of our projected future cash flows and the carrying value of our property, plant and equipment and intellectual property, including proprietary technology, we wrote down the goodwill in our North American operations segment by $92.3 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2003.

Pension Assumptions 

We have several defined benefit retirement plans covering our hourly employees. The defined benefit plan covering certain U.S. employees is an ERISA and IRS-qualified plan and we make annual contributions in amounts at least equal to the minimum amounts required by ERISA. The defined benefit plans covering all hourly employees in Germany were established by the company to provide a monthly pension benefit upon retirement. We have no legal obligation to fund the German plans. 

Pension benefit obligations and the related effects on operations are calculated using actuarial models. Two critical assumptions, discount rate and expected return on assets, are important elements of plan expense and/or liability measurement. We evaluate these critical assumptions annually in the fourth quarter. Other assumptions involve demographic factors such as retirement, mortality and turnover. These assumptions are evaluated periodically and are updated to reflect our experience. Actual results that differ from the estimates may result in more or less future company funding into pension plans and more or less pension expense than is planned by management. 

Seasonality 

Our business is mildly seasonal, with the second half of each year typically having a lower level of net sales and operating income. This seasonality is the result of summer manufacturing shutdowns and the impact of year-end holidays. 

New Accounting Pronouncements 

We have reviewed all recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements and do not believe any such pronouncements will have a material impact on our financial statements. 

Forward-Looking Statements 

This report contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Any statements that are not historical, which may include forward-looking words such as "anticipate," "believe," "could," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "should," "will" and "would" or similar words, fall within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements, based on assumptions believed to be valid at the time, discuss our future expectations, contain projections of our future results of operations or of our financial position or state other "forward-looking" information. The following items, "Factors Affecting Future Results", as well as any cautionary language in this report, provide examples of risks, uncertaint
ies and events that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking statements. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. We do not undertake to update any forward-looking statement made in this report or that may, from time to time, be made by us, or on our behalf. 

Factors Affecting Future Results 

Our future results of operations and our financial position may be affected by a number of factors and risks, including, but not limited to, the following: 

Fluctuations in the costs and availability of raw materials could harm our business. 

Our principal raw materials, hardwood and softwood pulp, and secondary fiber, are cyclical in both price and supply. The cyclical nature of pulp pricing presents a potential risk to our gross profit margins because we may not be able to pass along price increases to our customers. We may also be unable to purchase pulp in sufficient quantities, or at acceptable prices, to meet our production requirements during times of tight supply. DuPont is the sole source of Tyvek®, a critical component in our binding tapes. A significant price increase or any material limitation or interruption in our supply of key raw materials, including pulp, Tyvek®, or latex, particularly if we are unable to pass those increases through to our customers, could harm our financial condition, results
 of operations and competitive position. 

Fluctuations in economic activity and demand for our products could harm our business. 

The markets for our products are variable and are influenced to a significant degree by the global economic activity and fluctuations in our customers' demand and inventory levels. Downturns in global economic conditions and decreased demand for specialty fiber-based materials could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. 

Competition in specialty paper and materials markets could harm our financial condition and results of operations.

We face intense competition, which could harm our financial condition and results of operations. Our principal competitors include a small number of paper and specialty paper manufacturers. Additionally, we compete with producers of vinyl, plastic or other materials. Some of these producers have substantially greater resources than we do. Further concentration of our competitors through mergers and acquisitions may increase their competitive advantage. In addition, some of our customers have the internal ability to process some or all of the materials they buy from us, and have in the past elected to do so. To the extent our customers elect to do so in the future, our business could suffer. Industry and market-specific capacity levels can also affect competitive behavior and adversely impact pri
cing levels. Increased concentration of buying power in certain large direct or indirect customers can have similar effects. 

Our industry is subject to many environmental and other governmental regulations. These regulations could give rise to significant additional liabilities or expenditures or restrictions on our business, any of which could cause our financial condition and results of operations to suffer.

Our operations and properties are subject to a wide variety of foreign, federal, state and local laws and regulations, including those governing the use, storage, handling, generation, treatment, emission, release, discharge and disposal of various materials, substances and wastes, the remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater, and the health and safety of employees. Such regulations can restrict our operations, and expose us to claims and other liabilities with respect to environmental protection, remediation and health and safety matters. We could incur material costs or other liabilities in connection with such regulations or claims. In addition, future events, such as new information, changes in environmental or health and safety laws or regulations or their interpretation, and more vigorous enforcement policies of regulatory agencies, may result in significant additional expenditures, liabilities or restrictions that could harm our financial condition, results of operations and competitive position.

Disruptions caused by labor disputes or organized labor activities may harm our business.

A large proportion of our workforce is represented by labor unions. In addition, we may from time to time experience union organizing activities in currently non-union facilities. Disputes with the current labor organizations with which we work or new union organizing activities may result in work slowdowns or stoppages or higher labor costs. A work slowdown or stoppage in any one of our facilities could slow or halt production from that facility and from any other facility which depends on that facility for its material. As a result, meeting scheduled delivery times for our customers could be difficult or impossible, which could result in loss of business.

Our substantial level of indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition.

We have substantial indebtedness. As of September 30, 2003, we had $345.9 million of indebtedness, which includes long-term debt plus obligations under the Lowville, New York sale-leaseback agreement. In addition, subject to restrictions in the indenture for our outstanding 10.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011, our revolving credit facility and the indenture for our outstanding 9.375% Series B Senior Notes due 2006, we may incur additional indebtedness. Our high level of indebtedness could have important consequences, which might include the following: impair our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or general corporate purposes; reduce the funds available to us for other purposes such as capital expenditures; create a c
ompetitive disadvantage, to the extent that our indebtedness exceeds the level of some competitors, and reduce our flexibility in planning for, or responding to, changing conditions in our industry, including increased competition; increase our vulnerability to economic downturns and adverse developments in our business; incur restrictions that limit our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries, among other things, to incur additional indebtedness or liens; pay dividends or make other distributions; repurchase our common stock; make investments; sell assets; enter into agreements restricting our subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends; enter into transactions with affiliates; and consolidate, merge or sell all or substantially all of our assets. 

We expect to obtain funds to service our debt over time primarily from our operations. We cannot be certain that our cash flow will be sufficient to allow us to pay such debt service. If we do not have sufficient cash flow, we may be required to refinance all or part of our existing debt, sell assets or borrow more money. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so on terms acceptable to us. In addition, the terms of existing or future debt agreements may restrict us from adopting any of these alternatives. The failure to generate sufficient cash flow or to achieve such alternatives could have a significant adverse affect on our ability to make required payments. 

In addition, a breach of any of the financial covenants could result in a default in respect of the related indebtedness. If a default occurs, the relevant lenders and holders could elect to declare the indebtedness, together with accrued interest and other fees, to be immediately due and payable and proceed against any collateral securing that indebtedness. 

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK 

We believe we have minimal exposure to financial market risks. The majority of our debt is at a fixed rate. Most of our sales transactions have been conducted in the currency where the shipment originated, limiting our exposure to changes in currency exchange rates. We do not use derivative financial instruments. 

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 

The company’s management, with the participation of the company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of September 30, 2003. In designing and evaluating the company’s disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applied its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded
 that, as of September 30, 2003, the company’s disclosure controls and procedures were (1) designed to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report was being prepared and (2) effective, in that they provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. 

No change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION. 

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. 

Not applicable 

ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS. 

Not applicable 

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES. 

Not applicable 

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS 

Not applicable 

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION 

On August 8, 2003, FiberMark began trading of its common stock on the American Stock Exchange (AMEX) and ceased trading on the New York Stock Exchange effective August 7, 2003. 

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K:

(a) Exhibits.
10.49		GE Capital Financing Agreement
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 dated November 14, 2003.
32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 12a-14 and 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 12a-14 and 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(b) The following reports on Form 8-K were filed for the quarter for which this report is filed:

--		FiberMark, Inc. filed a current report on Form 8-K dated July 17,2003 announcing the resignation of director Jon H. Miller
--		FiberMark, Inc. filed a current report on Form 8-K dated July 22,2003 announcing furtheremployee layoffs
--		FiberMark, Inc. filed a current report on Form 8-K dated August 6,2003 announcing financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
--		FiberMark, Inc. filed a current report on Form 8-K dated August 12, 2003 announcing that Standard and Poor’s lowered its corporate credit ratings for FiberMark to "B" from "B+"
--		FiberMark, Inc. filed a current report on Form 8-K dated August 14, 2003 announcing that Moody’s lowered FiberMark’s senior implied rating and guaranteed senior unsecured debt ratings to ‘Caa1’ from ‘B2’, with a negative outlook


	FiberMark, Inc.

Date: November 14, 2003	By:	/s/ Allan M. Kline

		Allan M. Kline Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer)


	FiberMark, Inc.

Date: November 14, 2003	By:	/s/ John E. Hanley

		John E. Hanley Vice President and Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

Number		Description

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer dated November 14, 2003 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 12a-14 and 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 12a-14 and 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)	[Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release 34-47986]
c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

	PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited):
	Consolidated Statements of Operations
	Three Months Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002
	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002
	Consolidated Balance Sheets
	September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
	Condition and Results of Operations
ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
ITEM 4.	Controls and Procedures

	PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	Legal Proceedings
ITEM 2.	Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
ITEM 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities
ITEM 4.	Submission of Matters to Vote of Security Holders
ITEM 5.	Other Information
ITEM 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURES
Exhibit Index
CERTIFICATIONS

Date: November 14, 2003	/s/ Alex Kwader

	Alex Kwader Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 14, 2003	/s/ Allan M. Kline

	Allan M. Kline Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FiberMark, Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.