Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Commission File Number   1-12273

ROPER INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	51-0263969
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
2160 Satellite Blvd., Suite 200 Duluth, Georgia	30097
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(770) 495-5100
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes   X   No       

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes   X   No      

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s common stock as of July 23, 2004 was approximately 37,007,127.

ROPER INDUSTRIES, INC.

REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2004

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Roper Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings (unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Roper Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)
(in thousands)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Roper Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
(in thousands)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Roper Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Earnings (unaudited)
(in thousands)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Roper Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2004

1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are unaudited. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Roper Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Roper”) for all periods presented.

Certain reclassifications have been made to previously reported information to conform to the current presentation.

Roper’s management has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The results of operations for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full calendar year. You should read these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conjunction with Roper’s consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in its 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

2. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing net earnings (there were no adjustments necessary to determine earnings available to common shares) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share included the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents outstanding during the period. Common stock equivalents consisted of stock options.

3. Comprehensive Earnings

Comprehensive earnings include net earnings and all other non-owner sources of changes in net assets. Comprehensive earnings (in thousands) for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were $23,056 and $28,346, respectively, and $38,350 and $46,071 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 respectively. The differences between net earnings and comprehensive earnings were currency translation adjustments. Income taxes have not been provided on currency translation adjustments.

4. Inventories

5. Goodwill

The increase in goodwill in the Energy Systems and Controls segment relates to the acquisition of the power generation business of R/D Tech which closed on June 7, 2004.

6. Other intangible assets, net

Amortization expense of other intangible assets was $8,510 and $2,114 during the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

7. Contingencies

Roper, in the ordinary course of business, is the subject of, or a party to, various pending or threatened legal actions, including those pertaining to product liability and employment practices. It is vigorously contesting all lawsuits that, in general, are based upon claims of the kind that have been customary over the past several years. Based upon Roper’s past experience with resolution of its product liability and employment practices claims and the limits of the primary, excess, and umbrella liability insurance coverages that are available with respect to pending claims, management believes that adequate provision has been made to cover any potential liability not covered by insurance, and that the ultimate liability, if any, arising from these actions should not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows of Roper.

Over recent years there has been a significant increase in certain U.S. states in asbestos-related litigation claims against numerous industrial companies. Roper or its subsidiaries have been named defendants in some such cases. No significant resources have been required by Roper to respond to these cases and Roper believes it has valid defenses to such claims and, if required, intends to defend them vigorously. Given the state of these claims it is not possible to determine the potential liability, if any.

The Company’s financial statements include accruals for potential product liability and warranty claims based on the Company’s claims experience. Such costs are accrued at the time revenue is recognized. A summary of the Company’s warranty accrual activity for the six months ended June 30, 2004 is presented below (in thousands).

8. Industry Segments

Sales and operating profit by industry segment are set forth in the following table (dollars in thousands):

        * Operating profit is before unallocated corporate general and administrative expenses. Such expenses were $3,644 and $3,416 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $7,590 and $6,413 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

9. Discontinued Operations

During the transitional period ended December 31, 2002, the Company formalized its decision to offer for sale the Petrotech operation. Petrotech was subsequently sold on August 31, 2003. Accordingly, related operating results reported as discontinued operations are outlined as follows (amounts in thousands):

The Petrotech operation was previously reported in the Company’s Energy Systems and Controls segment. The accompanying financial statements have been restated to conform to discontinued operations treatment for all historical periods presented.

10. Recently Released Accounting Pronouncements

The FASB issued SFAS No. 148 – “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123” which provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this statement amends certain disclosure requirements of Statement 123. Currently, Roper has chosen not to adopt the accounting provisions of SFAS 123; however, as permitted by SFAS 123, the Company continues to apply intrinsic value accounting for its stock option plans under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (“APB 25”), “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Roper’s pro forma net earnings and pro forma earnings per share based upon the fair value at the grant dates for awards under the Company’s plans are disclosed below.

If the Company had elected to recognize compensation expense based upon the fair value at the grant dates for awards under these plans, the Company’s pro forma net income and income per share would have been approximately as presented below.

In January 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 106-1 (“FSP 106-1”) “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003,” which provides temporary guidance concerning the recently enacted Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “Act”). SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions,” requires presently enacted changes in laws that will take effect in future periods to be taken into account in measuring current period postretirement benefit cost and the accumulated projected benefit obligation (“APBO”). The Company’s net periodic post retirement benefit cost does not reflect any amount associated with the subsidy because we are unable to conclude whether the benefits provided by the plan are actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D under the Act at the present time.

The Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF 03-06, effective for periods ending after March 31, 2004, regarding the computation of earnings per share by companies that have issued securities other than common stock that contractually entitle the holder to participate in dividends and earnings of the company when, and if, it declares dividends on its common stock. The Company does not have securities subject to the provisions of EITF 03-06 and the implementation of EITF 03-06 had no material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

11. Restricted Stock

In June 2004, restricted stock awards for a total of 16,000 shares and a deferred stock award for 2,000 shares were awarded to the Company’s non-management directors under the Company’s equity compensation plans in which these directors participate. The restrictions on 50% of the restricted stock awards to a director will lapse upon his continuous service for six months following the grant, and the restrictions on the remaining 50% upon his continuous service for one year following the grant. Similarly, 50% of the deferred stock award will vest upon continuous service for six months and the remaining 50% will vest upon one year of continuous service. Directors who received restricted stock will have voting rights and receive dividends, but the shares may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered. The deferred stock award shares will be issued without restrictions upon the completion of the applicable continuous service periods. A director who terminates his service before the applicable restricted or continuous service periods run will forfeit the right to receive the corresponding shares.

The fair value of the shares awarded by the restricted stock and deferred stock awards on the date of grant is amortized ratably over the vesting period. Unearned compensation on the June 2004 grant of the awards of $945,180 was recorded based on the market value of the shares on the date of grant and is generally being amortized over one year. The unamortized balance of unearned compensation on the awards is included as a separate component of stockholders’ equity.

Compensation expense of $118,148 was recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2004 for the awards.

12. Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes

In December, 2003, Roper issued $230 million of 3.75% subordinated convertible notes due 2034 at an original issue discount of 60.498% (the “Convertible Notes”). The Convertible Notes are subordinated in right of payment and collateral to all of our existing and future senior debt. Interest on the notes is payable semiannually, beginning July 15, 2004, until January 15, 2009. After that date, we will not pay cash interest on the notes prior to maturity unless contingent cash interest becomes payable. Instead, after January 15, 2009, interest will be recognized at the effective rate of 3.75% and will represent accrual of original issue discount, excluding any contingent cash interest that may become payable. We will pay contingent cash interest to the holders of the notes during any six month period commencing after January 15, 2009 if the average trading price of a note for a five trading day measurement period preceding the applicable six month period equals 120% or more of the sum of the issue price, accrued original issue discount and accrued cash interest, if any, for such note. The contingent cash interest payable per note in respect of any six month period will equal the annual rate of 0.25%. Holders may convert their notes into 6.211 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment, only (1) if the sale price of our common stock reaches, or the trading price of the notes falls below, specified thresholds, (2) if the notes are called for redemption, or (3) if specified corporate transactions have occurred. Upon conversion, we will have the right to deliver, in lieu of our common stock, cash or common stock or a combination of cash and common stock. Holders may require us to purchase all or a portion of their notes on January 15, 2009 at a price of $395.02 per note, on January 15, 2014 at a price of $475.66 per note, on January 15, 2019 at a price of $572.76 per note, on January 15, 2024 at a price of $689.68 per note, and on January 15, 2029 at a price of $830.47 per note, in each case plus accrued cash interest, if any, and accrued contingent cash interest, if any. We may only pay the purchase price of such notes in cash and not in common stock. In addition, if we experience a change in control, each holder may require us to purchase for cash all or a portion of such holder’s notes at a price equal to the sum of the issue price plus accrued original issue discount for non-tax purposes, accrued cash interest, if any, and accrued contingent cash interest, if any, to the date of purchase.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the notes to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report.

Overview

Roper Industries, Inc. (“Roper”, “we” or “us”) is a diversified industrial company that designs, manufactures and distributes energy systems and controls, scientific and industrial imaging products and software, industrial technology products and instrumentation products and services. We market these products and services to selected segments of a broad range of markets including water and wastewater, oil and gas, research, power generation, medical, semiconductor, refrigeration, automotive, and general industry.

We pursue consistent and sustainable growth in earnings by emphasizing continuous improvement in the operating performance of our existing businesses and by acquiring other carefully selected businesses. Our acquisitions have represented both financial bolt-ons and new strategic platforms. We strive for high cash and earnings returns from our acquisition investments. During the first six months of calendar 2004, our results of operations benefited from the acquisition of Neptune Technology Group Holdings, Inc. (“NTGH”) made on December 29, 2003. NTGH is comprised of Neptune Technology, a leader in the meter management market; DB Microware, providing various software products for utility markets; and DAP Technologies, a leading fully rugged computer provider. Neptune Technology and DB Microware are both reported in the Industrial Technology segment, and DAP Technologies is reported in the Scientific and Industrial Imaging segment. On June 7, 2004 we purchased the power generation business of R/D Tech which will complement Roper’s existing business of nondestructive evaluation systems for power utilities and will be reported in the Energy Systems and Controls segment. This acquisition did not significantly contribute to the results of operations being reported for the period ended June 30, 2004.

Since 1993, our most significant customer has been OAO Gazprom (“Gazprom”), a Russian enterprise that is the world’s largest gas provider. We have provided complex gas transmission pipeline controls and related services to Gazprom that represented at least 7% of our sales during the period 1993 to 2002. Our growth elsewhere and declines in Gazprom demand have resulted in Gazprom sales being less than 1% of total net sales during the early part of this year and we expect this level for the full year. We understand that Gazprom demand has declined due to hard currency liquidity issues and changes in their procurement practices, including the purchase of control systems from Russian OEM turbomachinery manufacturers. We supply control systems to certain of these OEM’s.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). A discussion of our significant accounting policies can be found in the notes to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003 included in our Annual Report.

GAAP offers acceptable alternative methods for accounting for certain issues affecting our financial results, such as determining inventory cost, depreciating long-lived assets, recognizing revenues and issuing stock options to employees. We have not changed the application of acceptable accounting methods or the significant estimates affecting the application of these principles in the last three years in a manner that had a material effect on our financial statements, except for the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.”

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires the use of estimates, assumptions, judgments and interpretations that can affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and other supplemental disclosures.

The development of accounting estimates is the responsibility of our management. Our management discusses those areas that require significant judgments with the audit committee of our board of directors. The audit committee discusses critical estimates with our external auditors and reviews all financial disclosures to be included in our filings with the SEC. Although we believe the positions we have taken with regard to uncertainties are reasonable, others might reach different conclusions and our positions can change over time as more information becomes available. If an accounting estimate changes, its effects are accounted for prospectively.

Our most significant accounting uncertainties are encountered in the areas of accounts receivable collectibility, inventory utilization, future warranty obligations, revenue recognition (percent of completion), income taxes and goodwill analysis. These issues, except for income taxes, which are not allocated to our business segments, affect each of our business segments. These issues are evaluated primarily using a combination of historical experience, current conditions and relatively short-term forecasting.

Accounts receivable collectibility is based on the economic circumstances of customers and credits given to customers after shipment of products, including in certain cases, credits for returned products. Accounts receivable are regularly reviewed to determine customers who have not paid within agreed upon terms, whether these amounts are consistent with past experiences, what historical experience has been with amounts deemed uncollectible and the impact that current and near-term forecast economic conditions might have on collection efforts in general and with specific customers. The returns and other sales credit histories are analyzed to determine likely future rates for such credits. At June 30, 2004, our allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, sales returns and sales credits was $4.9 million, or 2.9% of total gross accounts receivable of $166.7 million. The amount of the reserve is consistent with our prior year end rate of 2.9%.

We regularly compare inventory quantities on hand against anticipated future usage, which we determine as a function of historical usage or forecasts related to specific items in order to evaluate obsolescence and excessive quantities. When we use historical usage, this information is also qualitatively compared to business trends to evaluate the reasonableness of using historical information as an estimate of future usage. Business trends can change rapidly and these events can affect the evaluation of inventory balances. At June 30, 2004, inventory reserves for excess and obsolete inventory were $24.0 million, or 17.8% of gross first-in, first-out inventory cost. The amount of our inventory reserve is comparable to the prior year end amount and slightly lower as a percentage of gross first-in, first-out inventory cost.

Most of our sales are covered by warranty provisions that generally provide for the repair or replacement of qualifying defective items for a specified period after the time of sale, typically 12 months. Future warranty obligations are evaluated using, among other factors, historical cost experience, product evolution and customer feedback. At June 30, 2004, the accrual for future warranty obligations was $5.0 million or 0.5% of annualized quarter’s sales. The reserve was approximately the same value at the beginning of the quarter and prior year end.

Net sales recognized under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting are estimated and dependent on a comparison of total costs incurred to date to total estimated costs for a project. During the second quarter of 2004, we recognized $4.2 million of net sales using this method. In addition, approximately $8.6 million of net sales related to unfinished percentage-of-completion contracts had yet to be recognized at June 30, 2004. Net sales accounted for under this method are generally not significantly different in profitability compared with net sales for similar products and services accounted for under other methods.

Income taxes can be affected by estimates of whether, and within which jurisdictions, future earnings will occur and how and when cash is repatriated to the United States, combined with other aspects of an overall income tax strategy. Additionally, taxing jurisdictions could retroactively disagree with our tax treatment of certain items, and some historical transactions have income tax effects going forward. Accounting rules require these future effects to be evaluated using current laws, rules and regulations, each of which can change at any time and in an unpredictable manner. We utilized an effective income tax rate of 30.5% in the first quarter, which is 50 basis points higher than the 30.0% rate used in the prior year second quarter. This increase reflects the impact of the NTGH businesses acquired in the fourth quarter of 2003 and the capital restructuring completed in conjunction with that acquisition.

The evaluation of the carrying value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles is required to be performed annually. We perform this analysis during our fourth quarter.

Results of Operations

General

The following tables set forth selected information for the periods indicated. Dollar amounts are in thousands and percentages are the particular line item shown as a percentage of net sales. Percentages may not foot due to rounding.

Three months ended June 30, 2004 compared to three months ended June 30, 2003

Net sales for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 were $232.4 million as compared to $166.1 million in the prior-year quarter, a 40.0% increase. The majority of this increase was due to the NTGH acquisition completed on December 29, 2003, however, all of our segments showed improvement over the prior year quarter, with organic sales, excluding net sales to Gazprom, of $173.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $157.4 million in the prior year quarter, a 10.0% increase. During the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 our net sales to Gazprom were $0.7 million and $8.7 million, respectively.

In our Industrial Technology segment, net sales were up 132.4% to $101.0 million in the second quarter of calendar 2004 as compared to $43.4 million in the second quarter of calendar 2003 due primarily to the inclusion of Neptune Technology and DB Microware in the current year quarter and strong organic sales gains. Gross margins were lower at 42.6% for the second quarter of calendar 2004 as compared to 46.2% in the second quarter of calendar 2003. The decrease was primarily due to the Neptune margins being lower than the segment average. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales were 21.1%, down from 24.5% in the prior year quarter. The reduction was primarily due to a lower SG&A structure for the Neptune business, but we also experienced some benefit from completed restructuring activities. The resulting operating profit margins were 21.5% in the second quarter of calendar 2004 as compared to 21.6% in the second quarter of calendar 2003.

In our Instrumentation segment, net sales were up $6.4 million or 14.7% as compared to the prior year quarter due to a stronger euro and continued strength in petroleum and materials testing markets. Gross margins were down slightly at 57.4% in the current quarter compared to 57.7% in the first quarter of calendar 2003 as a result of a stronger euro. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased to 40.4% in the current quarter, compared to 45.6% in the prior-year quarter due to the benefits of completed restructuring activities. Overall, the segment reported a 490 basis point improvement in operating profit margins of 17.0% as compared to 12.1% in the prior-year quarter.

Net sales in our Energy Systems & Controls segment increased by 1.1% to $36.3 million during the second quarter of calendar 2004 compared to the second quarter of calendar 2003. Excluding sales to Gazprom, second quarter net sales increased 30.9% from $27.2 million to $35.6 million due to strong activity with oil & gas and power utility maintenance customers during the spring outage season. Gross margins increased to 52.3% in the second quarter of calendar 2004 compared to 48.7% in the second quarter of calendar 2003 as a result of higher margins in the power generation inspection business arising out of higher volumes and realization of benefits from restructuring activities. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales were down slightly to 33.4% compared to prior year quarter at 33.7%. As a result, operating margins were 18.9% in the second quarter of calendar 2004 as compared to 15.0% in second quarter of calendar 2003.

Our Scientific & Industrial Imaging segment net sales increased by 4.8% due to the inclusion of sales of DAP Technologies, part of the NTGH acquisition. Gross margins improved from 52.2% in the second quarter of 2003 to 56.0% in the second quarter of calendar 2004 due to strength in life science imaging equipment sales. SG&A as a percentage of net sales was 39.8% in the second quarter of calendar 2004 as compared to 37.5% in the second quarter of calendar 2003. Overall, the segment reported operating profit margins of 16.2% as compared to 14.7% in the prior year quarter.

Corporate expenses were $3.6 million in the second quarter of calendar 2004 as compared to $3.4 million in the second quarter of calendar 2003. Additional governance costs were the primary factor behind the increase.

Interest expense of $6.8 million for the second quarter of calendar 2004 was 56.0% higher as compared to the second quarter of calendar 2003 interest expense of $4.4 million. This increase is due to the higher debt levels associated with the NTGH acquisition completed in December 2003.

Income taxes were 30.5% of pretax earnings in the current quarter as compared to 30.0% in the second quarter of calendar 2003. This increase reflects the impact of the NTGH businesses acquired in the fourth quarter of 2003 and the capital restructuring completed in conjunction with that acquisition.

At June 30, 2004, the functional currencies of our European subsidiaries were slightly stronger against the U.S. dollar compared to currency exchange rates at December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2003. The currency changes resulted in a loss of $0.5 million in the foreign exchange component of comprehensive earnings for the quarter. Approximately $0.1 million of the total adjustment related to goodwill and is not expected to directly affect our expected future cash flows. Operating results in the second quarter of 2004 benefited slightly from the weakening of the US dollar, primarily against the Euro. The difference between the operating results for these companies for the three months ending June 30, 2004, translated into U.S. dollars at average currency exchange rates experienced during the quarter and these operating results translated into U.S. dollars at average currency exchange rates experienced during the comparable quarter in calendar 2003 was less than 1%.

Net orders, booked from continuing operations, were $223.0 million for the quarter, 33.9% higher than the second quarter calendar 2003 net order intake of $166.6 million. The NTGH acquisition in the prior year accounted for $50.6 million of the increase, with strong bookings also being experienced in our Instrumentation and Scientific and Industrial Imaging segments. Overall, our order backlog at June 30, 2004 was up 22.5% as compared to June 30, 2003. The increase is primarily in the Industrial Technology segment due to the Neptune Technology acquisition.

Six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to six months ended June 30, 2003

Net sales for the six month period ended June 30, 2004 were $453.1 million as compared to $315.5 million in the prior-year quarter, a 43.6% increase. The majority of this increase was due to the NTGH acquisition completed on December 29, 2003, however, all of our segments showed improvement over the prior year period.

In our Industrial Technology segment, net sales were up 132.1% to $194.1 million in the first six months of calendar 2004 as compared to $83.6 million in the first six months of calendar 2003 due primarily to the inclusion of Neptune Technology and DB Microware in the current year period and strong organic growth in most business lines. Gross margins were lower at 41.5% for the first six months of calendar 2004 as compared to 46.2% in the first six months of calendar 2003. The decrease was primarily due to the Neptune margins being lower than the segment average. Additionally, Neptune margins were adversely impacted by the inclusion of approximately $1.5 million in cost of goods sold during the first quarter related to purchase accounting that will not recur in future quarters. Also, the first quarter of 2004 included $0.3 million of restructuring costs included in cost of goods sold which are not expected to recur. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales were 22.2%, down from 24.5% in the prior year period. The reduction was primarily due to a lower SG&A structure for the Neptune business. Also, the first quarter of 2004 included $0.7 million of restructuring included in SG&A which is not expected to recur. The resulting operating profit margins were 19.3% in the first six months of calendar 2004 as compared to 21.8% in the first six months of calendar 2003.

In our Instrumentation segment, net sales were $98.8 million as compared to $85.8 million in the prior-year period, up $13.0 million or 15.1%. This segment experienced increased revenues from our foreign sales attributable to the stronger Euro and increased sales in certain petroleum and materials testing markets. Gross margins improved to 58.4% in the current period from 58.1% in the first six months of calendar 2003 with improved product mix and the benefits of completed restructuring activities. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales were held to 40.4% in the current period, compared to 43.2% in the prior-year period. Overall the segment reported operating profit margins of 18.0% as compared to 15.0% in the prior-year period.

Net sales in our Energy Systems & Controls segment increased by 7.4% to $68.3 million during the first six months of calendar 2004, compared to $63.6 million in the first six months of calendar 2003 due to strong performance in our power utility maintenance and oil & gas markets. Gross margins increased to 53.5% in the first six months of calendar 2004 compared to 50.6% in the first six months of calendar 2003 from higher margins in the power utility maintenance business off a strong spring outage season, partially reduced by lower oil and gas margins. SG&A expenses were constant year over year at 36.5%. As a result, operating margins were 17.0% in the first six months of calendar 2004 as compared to 14.1% in first six months of calendar 2003.

Our Scientific & Industrial Imaging segment net sales increased by 11.4% to $91.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the prior year period due primarily to the inclusion of sales of DAP Technologies, part of the NTGH acquisition. Gross margins improved from 52.3% in the first six months of 2003 to 55.1% in the first six months of calendar 2004 due to strength in imaging equipment sales. SG&A as a percentage of net sales was 39.4% in the first six months of calendar 2004 as compared to 36.9% in the first six months of calendar 2003. Overall, the segment reported operating profit margins of 15.7% as compared to 15.4% in the prior year six month period.

Corporate expenses were $7.6 million in the first six months of calendar 2004 as compared to $6.4 million in the first six months of calendar 2003. Additional governance costs and variable compensation expenses were the primary factors behind the increase.

Interest expense of $13.7 million for the first six months of calendar 2004 was 59.1% higher as compared to the first six months of calendar 2003 interest expense of $8.6 million. This increase is due to the higher debt levels associated with the NTGH acquisition completed in December 2003.

Income taxes were 30.5% of pretax earnings in the period ended June 30, 2004 as compared to 30.0% in the prior year period ended June 30, 2003. This increase reflects the impact of the NTGH businesses acquired in the fourth quarter of 2003 and the capital restructuring completed in conjunction with that acquisition.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Net cash provided by operating activities was $40.3 million in the second quarter of calendar 2004 as compared to $24.9 million in the second quarter of calendar 2003, a 62.0% increase. This increase is attributable to the inclusion of NTGH in the current year results and increased operating performance from our operating units as restructuring activities have been implemented and our continued focus on working capital. Cash used in investing activities in the second quarter of calendar 2004 was primarily for the acquisition of the power generation business of RD Tech which closed on June 7, 2004. There was no significant business acquisition activity in the second quarter of calendar 2003. Cash used by financing activities during the current calendar quarter was primarily for to the payment of dividends and debt reductions. Cash used by financing activities in the prior year second quarter was primarily payment of dividends and debt reductions created from our other net positive cash flows.

Net cash provided by operating activities in the first six months of calendar 2004 were 80.6% higher than in the equivalent period of calendar 2003 as a result of the inclusion of NTGH in the current period.

In January 2004, an underwriters’ overallotment of 630,000 shares of common stock was exercised and closed, providing the Company with gross proceeds of approximately $30.2 million before expenses.

$30.8 million of debt was repaid over the six months ended June 30, 2004 as compared with $17.3 million in the prior-year period. The Company paid off its revolving credit facility balance of $20.0 million that was outstanding subsequent to the closing of the NTGH acquisition. In addition, $10.0 million of principal payments on the Company’s $400.0 million term loan were made in accordance with the terms of the credit facility.

Net working capital (total current assets, excluding cash, less total current liabilities, excluding debt) was $184.8 million at June 30, 2004 compared to $170.4 million at December 31, 2003, reflecting the decrease in certain accrued liabilities that existed at year end related to the NTGH acquisition. Total debt was $619.4 million at June, 2004 compared to $651.1 million at December 31, 2003. The leverage of the Company improved as shown in the following table:

Our principal $625 million credit facility with a diverse group of financial institutions and banks and our $230 million senior subordinated convertible notes will provide most of our daily external financing requirements. The credit facility consists of a $400 million amortizing term loan with a five year maturity and a $225 million revolving loan with a three year maturity. Our senior subordinated convertible notes are due in 2034. At June 30, 2004, our debt consisted of the $230 million in senior subordinated convertible notes and $390 million of term loans under the credit facility. The Company also had $15.2 million of outstanding letters of credit at June 30, 2004. We expect that our available additional borrowing capacity combined with the cash flows expected to be generated from existing business will be sufficient to fund normal operating requirements and finance some additional acquisitions. We also have several smaller facilities that allow for borrowings or the issuance of letters of credit in various foreign locations to support our non-U.S. businesses. In total, these smaller facilities do not represent a significant source of credit for us.

The Company was in compliance with all debt covenants related to our credit facilities throughout the quarter ended June 30, 2004.

At June 30, 2004, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.

Capital expenditures of $2.6 million and $2.1 million were incurred during the second quarters of calendar 2004 and 2003 respectively. We expect capital expenditures for the balance of the year to be comparable to prior years as a percentage of sales.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In January 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 106-1 (“FSP 106-1”) “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003,” which provides temporary guidance concerning the recently enacted Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “Act”). SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions,” requires presently enacted changes in laws that will take effect in future periods to be taken into account in measuring current period postretirement benefit cost and the accumulated projected benefit obligation (“APBO”). The Company’s net periodic post retirement benefit cost does not reflect any amount associated with the subsidy because we are unable to conclude whether the benefits provided by the plan are actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D under the Act at the present time.

The Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF 03-06, effective for periods ending after March 31, 2004, regarding the computation of earnings per share by companies that have issued securities other than common stock that contractually entitle the holder to participate in dividends and earnings of the company when, and if, it declares dividends on its common stock. The Company does not have securities subject to the provisions of EITF 03-06 and the implementation of EITF 03-06 had no material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Outlook

Current geopolitical uncertainties could adversely affect our business prospects. A significant terrorist attack or other global conflict could cause changes in world economies that would adversely affect us. It is impossible to isolate each of these factor’s effects on current economic conditions. It is also impossible to predict with any reasonable degree of certainty what or when any additional events may occur that also will similarly disrupt the economy.

We maintain an active acquisition program; however, future acquisitions will be dependent on numerous factors and it is not feasible to reasonably estimate if or when any such acquisitions will occur and what the impact will be on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Such acquisitions may be financed by the use of existing credit lines, future cash flows from operations, the proceeds from the issuance of new debt or equity securities or some combination of these methods.

We anticipate that our recently acquired companies as well as our other companies will generate positive cash flows from operating activities, and that these cash flows will permit the reduction of currently outstanding debt at a pace consistent with that which has historically been experienced. However, the rate at which we can reduce our debt during calendar 2004 (and reduce the associated interest expense) will be affected by, among other things, the financing and operating requirements of any new acquisitions and the financial performance of our existing companies; and none of these factors can be predicted with certainty.

Information About Forward Looking Statements

This report includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. In addition, we, or our executive officers on our behalf, may from time to time make forward-looking statements in reports and other documents we file with the SEC or in oral statements made to the press, potential investors or others. All statements that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements.” The words “estimate,” “project,” “intend,” “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding our expected financial position, business, financing plans, business strategy, business prospects, revenues, working capital, liquidity, capital needs, interest costs and income, in each case relating to our company as a whole, as well as statements regarding acquisitions, potential acquisitions and the benefits of acquisitions, including with respect to the NTGH acquisition.

Forward-looking statements are estimates and projections reflecting our best judgment and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements. These statements are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions, which in turn are based on currently available information. Examples of forward looking statements in this report include but are not limited to our expectations regarding our ability to generate operating cash flows and reduce debt and associated interest expense and our expectations regarding growth through acquisitions. Important assumptions relating to the forward-looking statements include, among others, assumptions regarding demand for our products, the cost, timing and success of product upgrades and new product introductions, raw materials costs, expected pricing levels, the timing and cost of expected capital expenditures, expected outcomes of pending litigation, competitive conditions, general economic conditions and expected synergies relating to acquisitions, joint ventures and alliances. These assumptions could prove inaccurate. Although we believe that the estimates and projections reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, our expectations may prove to be incorrect. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from estimates or projections contained in the forward-looking statements include:

• any unforeseen liabilities associated with recent or future acquisitions;
• limitations on our business imposed by our indebtedness;
• reductions in our business with Gazprom;
• the success of our restructuring activities in reducing costs;
• unfavorable changes in foreign exchange rates;
• difficulties associated with exports;
• risks and costs associated with our international sales and operations;
• difficulty making acquisitions and successfully integrating acquired businesses;
• increased product liability and insurance costs;
• increased directors and officers liability and other insurance costs;
• product liability and insurance risks;
• increased warranty exposure;
• future competition;
• the cyclical nature of our markets;
• changes in the supply of, or price for, parts and components;
• environmental compliance costs and liabilities;
• risks and costs associated with asbestos-related litigation;
• potential write-offs of our substantial intangible assets;
• our ability to successfully develop new products;
• failure to protect our technology;
• trade tariffs that may be applied due to the U.S. government’s delay in complying with certain WTO directives;
• terrorist attacks;
• future health crises; and
• the factors discussed in Exhibit 99.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 under the heading “Risk Factors.”

We believe these forward-looking statements are reasonable. However, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which are based on current expectations. Further, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update publicly any of them in light of new information or future events.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to interest rate risks on our outstanding borrowings, and we are exposed to foreign currency exchange risks on our transactions denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We are also exposed to equity market risks pertaining to the traded price of our common stock.

At June 30, 2004 we had a combination of fixed-rate borrowings (primarily our $230 million senior subordinated convertible notes) and relatively variable rate borrowings under the $625 million credit facility. Our $400 million 5-year term note under this credit facility was variable at a spread over LIBOR. Any borrowings under the $225 million revolving credit facility have a fixed rate, but the terms of these individual borrowings are generally only one to three months. During the first quarter of 2004, we fixed the interest rate at 4.108% on $100 million of the term note for a period of two years. At June 30, 2004, there was no material difference between prevailing market rates and the fixed rate on our debt instruments.

At June 30, 2004, Roper’s outstanding variable-rate borrowings under the $625 million credit facility were $290 million. An increase in interest rates of 1% would increase our annualized interest costs by $2.9 million.

Several Roper companies have transactions and balances denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Most of these transactions or balances are denominated in euros, British pounds, Danish krone or Japanese yen. Sales by companies whose functional currency was not the U.S. dollar were 32.1% of our total sales and 82.3% of these sales were by companies with a European functional currency. The U.S. dollar weakened against these European currencies during the second quarter of 2004 and was relatively stable compared to other currencies. The difference between the current quarter operating results for these companies translated into U.S. dollars at average currency exchange rates experienced during second-quarter 2004 and these operating results translated into U.S. dollars at average currency exchange rates experienced during second-quarter 2003 was not material. If these currency exchange rates had been 10% different throughout the second quarter of 2004 compared to currency exchange rates actually experienced, the impact on our expected net earnings would have been approximately $0.6 million.

The changes in these currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar during the second quarter of 2004 compared to currency exchange rates at March 31, 2004 resulted in a decrease in net assets of $0.5 million that was reported as a component of comprehensive earnings, $0.1 million of which was attributed to goodwill. Goodwill changes from currency exchange rate changes do not directly affect our reported earnings or cash flows.

The trading price of Roper’s common stock influences the valuation of stock option grants and the effects these grants have on pro forma earnings disclosed in our financial statements. The stock price also influences the computation of the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options to determine diluted earnings per share. The stock price also affects our employees’ perceptions of various programs that involve our common stock. We believe the quantification of the effects of these changing prices on our future earnings and cash flows is not readily determinable.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As required by Securities and Exchange Commission rules, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer. Based on this evaluation, these officers have concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There were no changes to our internal controls during the period covered by this quarterly report that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Disclosure controls and procedures are our controls and other procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act are accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Roper held its 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 26, 2004. Of the 36,805,627 shares eligible to vote at the meeting, 20,150,024 were present either in person or by proxy. Of the shares present, 365,127 shares were asserted to be entitled to five votes per share based on certain beneficial ownership holding period requirements. The following proposals were submitted to shareholders at the 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Proposal 1: Election of Four (4) Directors

Each of the directors identified below elected at the 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders was elected for a term expiring at the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Continuing directors whose terms expire at either the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are as follows: Donald G. Calder (2005), Derrick N. Key (2005), Christopher Wright (2005), Wilbur J. Prezzano (2006), Georg Graf Schall-Riaucour (2006), and Eriberto R. Scocimara (2006).

Proposal 2: Approval of the Roper Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Incentive Plan

Following are the election results for these proposals.

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

b.     Reports on Form 8-K

We furnished the following reports on Form 8-K during the second quarter of 2004.

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

EXHIBIT INDEX

TO REPORT ON FORM 10-Q