FORM 10-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 (FEE REQUIRED)
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002
Commission File Number 0-21762
Gateway Tax Credit Fund III Ltd.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Florida 59-3090386
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer No.)
incorporation or organization)
880 Carillon Parkway, St. Petersburg, Florida 33716
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's Telephone No., Including Area Code: (727)573-3800
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title of Each Class: Beneficial Assignee Certificates
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES X NO
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to item 405
of Regulation S-K (Sec. 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and
will be contained to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. X
Number of Record Holders
Title of Each Class March 31, 2002
Limited Partnership Interest 2,254
General Partner Interest 2
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Parts III and IV - Form S-11 Registration Statement
PART I
Item 1. Business
Gateway Tax Credit Fund III Ltd. ("Gateway") is a Florida Limited Partnership. The general partners are Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc., the Managing General Partner, and Raymond James Partners, Inc., both sponsors of Gateway Tax Credit Fund III Ltd. and wholly-owned subsidiaries of Raymond James Financial, Inc. Gateway was formed October 17, 1991 and commenced operations July 16, 1992 with the first admission of Limited Partners.
Gateway is engaged in only one industry segment, to acquire limited partnership interests in unaffiliated limited partnerships ("Project Partnerships"), each of which owns and operates one or more apartment complexes eligible for Low-Income Housing Tax Credits under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code ("Tax Credits"), received over a ten year period. Subject to certain limitations, Tax Credits may be used by Gateway's investors to reduce their income tax liability generated from other income sources. Gateway will terminate on December 31, 2040, or sooner, in accordance with the terms of its Limited Partnership Agreement. As of March 31, 2002, Gateway received capital contributions of $1,000 from the General Partners and from the Limited Partners, $10,395,000 in Series 7, $9,980,000 from Series 8, $6,254,000 from Series 9, $5,043,000 from Series 10 and $5,127,000 from Series 11.
Gateway offered Limited Partnership units in series. Each series is treated as though it were a separate partnership, investing in a separate and distinct pool of Project Partnerships. Net proceeds from each series are used to acquire Project Partnerships which are specifically allocated to such series. Income or loss and all tax items from the Project Partnerships acquired by each series are specifically allocated among the limited partners of such series.
Operating profits and losses, cash distributions from operations and Tax Credits are allocated 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% to the General Partners. Profit or loss and cash distributions from sales of property will be allocated as described in the Limited Partnership Agreement.
As of March 31, 2002, Gateway had invested in 39 Project Partnerships for Series 7, 43 Project Partnerships for Series 8, 24 Project Partnerships for Series 9, 15 Project Partnerships for Series 10 and 12 Project Partnerships for Series 11. Gateway acquired its interests in these properties by becoming a limited partner in the Project Partnerships that own the properties. The primary source of funds for each series is the capital contributions from Limited Partner investors.
All but eight of the properties are financed with mortgage loans from the Farmers Home Administration (now called United States Department of Agriculture - Rural Development) ("USDA-RD") under Section 515 of the Housing Act of 1949. These mortgage loans are made at low interest rates for multi-family housing in rural and suburban areas, with the requirement that the interest savings be passed on to low income tenants in the form of lower rents. A significant portion of the project partnerships also receive rental assistance from USDA-RD to subsidize certain qualifying tenants. One recently acquired property in Series 7 received conventional financing. One property in Series 9, two properties in Series 10 and one property in Series 11 are fully financed through the HOME Investment Partnerships Program.
These HOME Program loans provide financing at rates of 0 % to 0.5% for a period of 15 to 42 years. One property in Series 11 is partially financed by HOME. Two properties in Series 11 received conventional financing.
Risks related to the operations of Gateway are described in detail on pages 29 through 38 of the Prospectus, as supplemented, under the Caption "Risk Factors" which is incorporated herein by reference. The investment objectives of Gateway are to:
1) Provide tax benefits to Limited Partners in the form of Tax Credits during
the period in which each Project is eligible to claim tax credits;
2) Preserve and protect the capital contribution of Investors;
3) Participate in any capital appreciation in the value of the Projects; and
4) Provide passive losses to i) individual investors to offset passive income from other passive activities, and ii) corporate investors to offset business
income.
The investment objectives and policies of Gateway are described in detail on pages 39 through 47 of the Prospectus, as supplemented, under the caption "Investment Objectives and Policies" which is incorporated herein by reference.
Gateway's goal is to invest in a diversified portfolio of Project Partnerships located in rural and suburban locations with a high demand for low income housing. As of March 31, 2002 the Series' investor capital contributions were successfully invested in Project Partnerships which met the investment criteria. Management anticipates that competition for tenants will only be with other low income housing projects and not with conventionally financed housing. With a significant number of rural American households living below the poverty level in substandard housing, management believes there will be a continuing demand for affordable low income housing for the foreseeable future.
Gateway has no direct employees. Services are performed by the Managing General Partner and its affiliates and by agents retained by it. The Managing General Partner has full and exclusive discretion in management and control of Gateway.
Item 2. Properties
Gateway owns a majority interest in properties through its limited partnership investments in Project Partnerships. The largest single net investment in a Project Partnership in Series 7 is 5.2% of the Series' total balance sheet assets, Series 8 is 5.6%, Series 9 is 10.7%, Series 10 is 11.0% and Series 11 is 21.1%. The following table provides certain summary information regarding the Project Partnerships in which Gateway had an interest as of December 31, 2001:
Item 2 - Properties (continued):
SERIES 7
|
|
|
|
|
OCCU- |
Nottingham Cedar Hollow Sunrise Mountain City Burbank Washington BrookStone Tazewell N. Irvine Horton Manchester Waynesboro Lakeland II Mt. Vernon Meadow Run Spring Creek II Warm Springs Blue Ridge Walnut Pioneer Dilley Elsa Clinch View Jamestown Leander Louisa Sr. Orchard Commons Vardaman Heritage Park BrooksHollow Cavalry Crossing Carson City Matteson Pembroke Robynwood Atoka Coalgate Hill Creek Cardinal |
Pisgah, AL Waterloo, NE Mission, SD Mountain City, TN Falls City, NE Bloomfield, NE McCaysville, GA New Tazewell, TN Irvine, KY Horton, KS Manchester, GA Waynesboro, GA Lakeland, GA Mt. Vernon, GA Dawson, GA Quitman, GA Warm Springs, GA Blue Ridge, GA Elk Point, SD Mountain View, AR Dilley, TX Elsa, TX Gate City, VA Jamestown, TN Leander, TX Louisa, KY Crab Orchard, KY Vardaman, MS Paze, AZ Jasper, GA Ft. Scott, KS Carson City, KS Capa, KS Pembroke, KY Cynthiana, KY Atoka, OK Coalgate, OK West Blocton, AL Mountain Home, AR |
18 24 44 40 24 24 40 44 24 24 42 24 30 24 48 24 22 41 24 48 28 40 42 40 36 36 12 24 32 40 40 24 24 16 24 24 24 24 32 |
6/92 7/92 7/92 8/92 8/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 9/92 11/92 11/92 12/92 12/92 1/93 1/93 11/93 11/93 |
719,462 964,926 2,527,112 1,604,911 1,021,838 976,229 1,462,345 1,702,901 1,021,031 932,540 1,475,740 817,498 1,009,647 900,526 1,744,840 808,475 823,327 1,339,143 1,023,974 1,351,822 890,263 1,341,804 1,778,844 1,513,680 1,115,112 1,509,987 479,661 913,925 1,582,531 1,440,296 1,789,451 959,001 942,092 623,304 1,011,684 835,334 828,505 970,010 781,436 |
|
---- |
----------- |
||||
1,195 |
45,535,207 |
||||
==== |
=========== |
An average effective rental per unit is $3,486 per year ($290 per month).
Item 2 - Properties (continued):
SERIES 8
|
|
|
|
|
OCCU- |
Purdy Galena Antlers 2 Holdenville Wetumka Mariners Cove Mariners Cove Sr. Antlers Bentonville Deerpoint Aurora Baxter Arbor Gate Timber Ridge Concordia Sr. Mountainburg Lincoln Fox Ridge Meadow View Sheridan Morningside Grand Isle Meadowview Taylor Brookwood Pleasant Valley Reelfoot River Rest Kirskville Cimmaron Kenton Lovingston Pontotoc So. Brenchley Hustonville Northpoint Brooks Field Brooks Lane Brooks Point Brooks Run Logan Heights Lakeshore 2 Cottondale |
Purdy, MO Galena, KS Antlers, OK Holdenville, OK Wetumka, OK Marine City, MI Marine City, MI Antlers, OK Bentonville, AR Elgin, AL Aurora, MO Baxter Springs, KS Bridgeport, AL Collinsville, AL Concordia, KS Mountainburg, AR Pierre, SD Russellville, AL Bridgeport, NE Auburn, NE Kenton, OH Grand Isle, ME Van Buren, AR Taylor, TX Gainesboro, TN Lynchburg, TN Ridgely, TN Newport, TN Kirksville, MO Arco, ID Kenton, OH Lovingston, VA Pontotoc, MS Rexburg, ID Hustonville, KY Jackson, KY Louisville, GA Clayton, GA Dahlonega, GA Jasper, GA Russellville, KY Tuskegee, AL Cottondale, FL |
16 24 24 24 24 32 24 36 24 24 28 16 24 24 24 24 25 24 16 16 32 16 29 44 44 33 20 34 24 24 46 64 36 30 16 24 32 36 41 24 24 36 25 |
12/92 12/92 1/93 1/93 1/93 1/93 1/93 3/93 3/93 3/93 3/93 4/93 5/93 5/93 5/93 6/93 5/93 6/93 6/93 6/93 6/93 6/93 8/93 9/93 9/93 9/93 9/93 9/93 9/93 9/93 9/93 9/93 10/93 10/93 10/93 10/93 10/93 10/93 10/93 10/93 11/93 12/93 1/94 |
579,158 765,292 787,859 892,598 812,853 1,279,431 998,158 1,321,039 758,489 932,474 904,702 543,863 918,303 898,022 826,389 883,990 1,115,950 902,785 724,100 764,457 1,189,817 1,200,210 994,717 1,530,768 1,810,597 1,356,358 823,087 1,403,425 831,492 1,107,162 1,781,759 2,729,317 1,330,474 1,549,606 696,400 1,086,029 1,175,418 1,347,963 1,659,179 925,875 951,730 1,417,128 948,319 |
88% 92% 96% 100% 100% 84% 96% 100% 96% 96% 100% 100% 96% 83% 92% 96% 100% 92% 97% 100% 94% 56% 94% 100% 91% 100% 100% 100% 100% 83% 93% 92% 97% 100% 81% 100% 97% 100% 95% 100% 67% 97% 100% |
----- |
---------- |
||||
1,207 |
47,456,742 |
||||
===== |
========== |
An average effective rental per unit is $3,453 per year ($288 per month).
Item 2 - Properties (continued):
SERIES 9
|
|
|
|
|
OCCU- |
Jay Boxwood Stilwell 3 Arbor Trace Arbor Trace 2 Omega Cornell 2 Elm Creek Marionville Lamar Mt. Glen Centreville Skyview Sycamore Bradford Cedar Lane Stanton Abernathy Pembroke Meadowview Town Branch Fox Run Maple Street Manchester |
Jay, OK Lexington, TX Stilwell, OK Lake Park, GA Lake Park, GA Omega, GA Watertown, SD Pierre, SD Marionville, MO Lamar, AR Heppner, OR Centreville, AL Troy, AL Coffeyville, KS Cumberland, KY London, KY Stanton, KY Abernathy, TX Pembroke, KY Greenville, AL Mt. Vernon, KY Ragland, AL Emporium, PA Manchester, GA |
24 24 16 24 42 36 24 24 20 24 24 24 36 40 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 32 18 |
9/93 9/93 9/93 11/93 11/93 11/93 11/93 11/93 11/93 12/93 12/93 12/93 12/93 12/93 12/93 12/93 12/93 1/94 1/94 2/94 12/93 3/94 3/94 5/94 |
810,597 770,939 587,132 918,358 1,806,434 1,407,304 1,171,077 1,191,217 710,872 904,325 1,063,971 975,033 1,412,352 1,809,720 1,055,632 1,002,522 1,001,158 781,898 1,006,295 1,136,913 984,410 975,631 1,703,664 737,835 |
100% 100% 94% 100% 95% 97% 96% 58% 95% 100% 96% 100% 94% 98% 100% 100% 100% 96% 96% 88% 100% 100% 94% 89% |
----- |
----------- |
||||
624 |
25,925,289 |
||||
===== |
=========== |
An average effective rental per unit is $3,355 per year ($280 per month).
Item 2 - Properties (continued):
SERIES 10
|
|
|
|
|
OCCU- |
Redstone Albany Oak Terrace Wellshill Applegate Heatherwood Peachtree Donna Wellsville Tecumseh Clay City Irvine West New Castle Stigler Courtyard |
Challis, ID Albany, KY Bonifay, FL West Liberty, KY Florence, AL Alexander, AL Gaffney, SC Donna, TX Wellsville, NY Tecumseh, NE Clay City, KY Irvine, KY New Castle, KY Stigler, OK Huron, SD |
24 24 18 32 36 36 28 50 24 24 24 24 24 20 21 |
11/93 1/94 1/94 1/94 2/94 2/94 3/94 1/94 2/94 4/94 5/94 5/94 5/94 7/94 8/94 |
1,132,064 1,042,529 665,588 1,350,944 1,838,637 1,611,756 1,073,512 1,780,076 1,350,037 1,086,896 1,024,376 1,089,546 1,022,311 754,056 769,669 |
92% 96% 100% 100% 100% 97% 96% 96% 100% 58% 96% 100% 96% 100% 100% |
---- |
---------- |
||||
409 |
17,591,997 |
||||
==== |
========== |
An average effective rental per unit is $3,457 per year ($288 per month).
Item 2 - Properties (continued):
SERIES 11
|
|
|
|
|
OCCU- |
|
Homestead Mountain Oak Eloy Gila Bend Creekstone Tifton Cass Towne Warsaw Royston Red Bud Cardinal Parsons |
Pinetop, AZ Collinsville, AL Eloy, AZ Gila Bend, AZ Dallas, GA Tifton, GA Cartersville, GA Warsaw, VA Royston, GA Mokane, MO Mountain Home, AR Parsons, KS |
32 24 24 36 40 36 10 56 25 8 32 38 |
9/94 9/94 11/94 11/94 12/94 12/94 12/94 12/94 12/94 12/94 12/94 12/94 |
1,790,878 879,424 937,225 1,314,052 2,008,604 1,706,886 327,374 3,336,463 935,906 301,117 509,809 1,345,937 |
97% 88% 75% 78% 93% 100% 80% 100% 96% 88% 100% 92% |
|
---- |
----------- |
|||||
361 |
15,393,675 |
|||||
==== |
=========== |
An average effective rental per unit is $3,942 per year ($328 per month).
Item 2 - Properties (continued):
A summary of the cost of the properties at December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 is as follows:
12/31/01
SERIES 7 |
SERIES 8 |
SERIES 9 |
|
Land |
$ 1,633,733 |
$ 1,978,810 |
$ 1,099,659 |
SERIES 10 |
SERIES 11 |
TOTAL |
|
Land |
$ 648,625 |
$ 599,197 |
$ 5,960,024 |
12/31/00
SERIES 7 |
SERIES 8 |
SERIES 9 |
|
Land |
$ 1,629,533 |
$ 1,978,810 |
$ 1,099,659 |
SERIES 10 |
SERIES 11 |
TOTAL |
|
Land |
$ 648,625 |
$ 599,196 |
$ 5,955,823 |
12/31/99
SERIES 7 |
SERIES 8 |
SERIES 9 |
|
Land |
$ 1,619,533 |
$ 1,978,810 |
$ 1,099,659 |
SERIES 10 |
SERIES 11 |
TOTAL |
|
Land |
$ 648,625 |
$ 599,197 |
$ 5,945,824 |
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Gateway is not a party to any material pending legal proceedings.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
As of March 31, 2002, no matters were submitted to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Securities and Related Security Holder Matters
(a) Gateway's Limited Partnership interests are not publicly traded. There is no market for Gateway's Limited Partnership interests and it is unlikely that any will develop. No transfers of Limited Partnership Interests are permitted without the prior written consent of the Managing General Partner. There have been several transfers from inception to date with most being from individuals to their trusts or heirs. The Managing General Partner is not aware of the price at which Limited Partnership units are transferred. The criteria for and the details regarding transfers are found on pages A-28 and A-29 of the Limited Partnership Agreement under ARTICLE XII under the caption "Transfers of Units" found in the Prospectus, which is incorporated herein by reference.
There have been no distributions to Limited Partner investors from inception to date.
(b) Approximate Number of Equity Security Holders:
Number of Holders
Title of Class as of March 31, 2002
Limited Partner Interest 2,254
General Partner Interest 2
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,
SERIES 7 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss |
(390,210) |
(508,769) |
(555,736) |
(812,428) |
(1,010,863) |
Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
2,171,233 |
2,509,975 |
2,972,199 |
3,481,841 |
4,255,853 |
Investments In Project Partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
Per Weighted Average Limited Partnership Unit: (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss |
(37.16) |
(48.45) |
(52.93) |
(77.37) |
(96.27) |
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,
SERIES 8 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss |
(365,765) |
(539,766) |
(1,247,292) |
(1,055,240) |
(1,060,938) |
Equity in Losses of Project |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
1,442,531 |
1,749,931 |
2,238,666 |
3,435,008 |
4,446,829 |
Investments In Project Partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
Per Weighted Average Limited Partnership Unit: (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss |
(36.28) |
(53.54) |
(123.73) |
(104.68) |
(105.56) |
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,
SERIES 9 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss |
(407,619) |
(457,177) |
(547,924) |
(570,231) |
(512,506) |
Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
1,982,691 |
2,326,088 |
2,774,157 |
3,289,179 |
3,830,465 |
Investments In Project Partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
Per Weighted Average Limited Partnership Unit: (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss |
(64.53) |
(72.37) |
(86.74) |
(90.27) |
(81.13) |
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,
SERIES 10 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss |
(227,243) |
(321,107) |
(328,409) |
(264,781) |
(224,779) |
Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
2,674,512 |
2,889,469 |
3,202,510 |
3,523,986 |
3,784,494 |
Investments In Project Partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
Per Weighted Average Limited Partnership Unit: (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss |
(44.61) |
(63.04) |
(64.47) |
(51.98) |
(44.13) |
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,
SERIES 11 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
Total Revenues |
$ 22,823 |
$ 29,446 |
$ 27,431 |
$ 27,001 |
$ 26,502 |
Net Loss |
(209,234) |
(202,390) |
(164,613) |
(152,545) |
(183,183) |
Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
3,590,467 |
3,797,213 |
3,998,687 |
4,163,711 |
4,314,491 |
Investments In Project Partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
Per Weighted Average Limited Partnership Unit: (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss |
(40.40) |
(39.08) |
(31.79) |
(29.46) |
(35.37) |
(A) The tax information is as of December 31, the year end for tax purposes.
The above selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report. This statement is not covered by the auditor's opinion included elsewhere in this report.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Results of Operations, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Operations commenced on July 16, 1992 with the first admission of Limited Partners in Series 7. The proceeds from Limited Partner investors' capital contributions available for investment are used to acquire interests in Project Partnerships.
As disclosed on the statement of operations for each Series, except as described below, interest income is comparable for the years ended March 31, 2002, March 31, 2001 and March 31, 2000. General and Administrative expenses - General Partner and General and Administrative expenses - Other for the year ended March 31, 2002 are comparable to March 31, 2001 and March 31, 2000.
The capital resources of each Series are used to pay General and Administrative operating costs including personnel, supplies, data processing, travel and legal and accounting associated with the administration and monitoring of Gateway and the Project Partnerships. The capital resources are also used to pay the Asset Management Fee due the Managing General Partner, but only to the extent that Gateway's remaining resources are sufficient to fund Gateway's ongoing needs. (Payment of any Asset Management Fee unpaid at the time Gateway sells its interests in the Project Partnerships is subordinated to the investors' return of their original capital contribution.)
The sources of funds to pay the operating costs of each Series are short-term investments and interest earned thereon, the maturity of U.S. Treasury Security Strips ("Zero Coupon Treasuries"), which were purchased with funds set aside for this purpose, and cash distributed to the Series from the operations of the Project Partnerships.
Series 7 - Gateway closed this series on October 16, 1992 after receiving $10,395,000 from 635 Limited Partner investors. As of March 31, 2002, the series had invested $7,732,089 in 39 Project Partnerships located in 14 states containing 1,195 apartment units. Average occupancy of the Project Partnerships was 96% at December 31, 2001.
The Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships decreased from $434,461 for the year ended March 31, 2001 to $317,296 for the year ended March 31, 2002 as a result of not including losses of $712,066, as these losses would reduce the investment in certain Project Partnerships below zero. Equity in losses of Project Partnerships for the year ended March 31, 2000 of $471,721 were comparable to the Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships for the year ended March 31, 2001. In general, it is common in the real estate industry to experience losses for financial and tax reporting purposes because of the non-cash expenses of depreciation and amortization. (These Project Partnerships reported depreciation and amortization of $1,502,758, $1,466,589 and $1,457,962 for the periods ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively.) As a result, management expects that this Series, as well as the Series described below, will report its equity in Project Partnerships as a loss for tax and financial re
porting purposes. Overall management believes the Project Partnerships are operating as expected and are generating tax credits, which meet projections.
At March 31, 2002, the Series had $384,626 of short-term investments (Cash and Cash Equivalents). It also had $349,760 in Zero Coupon Treasuries with annual maturities providing $64,000 in fiscal year 2003 increasing to $86,000 in fiscal year 2008. Management believes the sources of funds are sufficient to meet current and ongoing operating costs for the foreseeable future, and to pay part of the Asset Management Fee.
As disclosed on the statement of cash flows, the Series had a net loss of $390,210 for the year ending March 31, 2002. However, after adjusting for Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships of $317,296 and the changes in operating assets and liabilities, net cash used in operating activities was $39,057 of which $47,061 was the Asset Management Fee actually paid. Cash provided by investing activities totaled $69,845 consisting of $37,656 in cash distributions from the Project Partnerships and $32,189 from matured Zero Coupon Treasuries. There were no unusual events or trends to describe.
Series 8 - Gateway closed this Series on June 28, 1993 after receiving $9,980,000 from 664 Limited Partner investors. As of March 31, 2002, the series had invested $7,586,105 in 43 Project Partnerships located in 18 states containing 1,207 apartment units. Average occupancy of the Project Partnerships was 95% at December 31, 2001.
Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships decreased from $1,158,932 for the year ended March 31, 2000 to $457,729 for the year ended March 31, 2001 to $272,241 for the year ended March 31, 2002. The decreases resulted from not including suspended losses, which increased from $429,743 for the year ended March 31, 2000 to $689,097 for the year ended March 31, 2001 to $832,101 for the year ended March 31, 2002, as these losses would reduce the investment in Project Partnerships below zero. (These Project Partnerships reported depreciation and amortization of $2,101,828, $1,578,473 and $1,522,646 for the periods ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively.) Overall management believes the Project Partnerships are operating as expected and are generating tax credits which meet projections.
At March 31, 2002, the Series had $456,356 of short-term investments (Cash and Cash Equivalents). It also had $331,606 in Zero Coupon Treasuries with annual maturities providing $59,000 in fiscal year 2003 increasing to $82,000 in fiscal year 2008. Management believes the sources of funds are sufficient to meet current and ongoing operating costs for the foreseeable future, and to pay part of the Asset Management Fee.
As disclosed on the statement of cash flows, the Series had a net loss of $365,765 for the year ending March 31, 2002. However, after adjusting for Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships of $272,241 and the changes in operating assets and liabilities, net cash used in operating activities was $41,614 of which $44,786 was the Asset Management Fee actually paid. Cash provided by investing activities totaled $50,627 consisting of $19,211 received in cash distributions from the Project Partnerships and $31,416 from matured Zero Coupon Treasuries. Management believes the sources of funds are sufficient to meet current and ongoing operating costs for the foreseeable future, and to pay part of the Asset Management Fee. There were no unusual events or trends to describe.
Series 9 - Gateway closed this Series on September 30, 1993 after receiving $6,254,000 from 406 Limited Partner investors. As of March 31, 2002, the series had invested $4,914,116 in 24 Project Partnerships located in 11 states containing 624 apartment units. Average occupancy of the Project Partnerships was 95% at December 31, 2001.
The Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships decreased from $496,765 for the year ended March 31, 2000 to $409,450 for the year ended March 31, 2001 to $355,237 for the year ended March 31, 2002. The decreases resulted from not including suspended losses, which increased from $78,588 for the year ended March 31, 2000 to $200,607 for the year ended March 31, 2001 to $300,173 for the year ended March 31, 2002, as these losses would reduce the investment in Project Partnerships below zero. (These Project Partnerships reported depreciation and amortization of $842,272, $832,666 and $820,700 for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively.) Overall management believes the Project Partnerships are operating as expected and are generating tax credits which meet projections.
At March 31, 2002, the Series had $251,331 of short-term investments (Cash and Cash Equivalents). It also had $224,916 in Zero Coupon Treasuries with annual maturities providing $35,000 in fiscal year 2003 increasing to $47,000 in fiscal year 2009. Management believes the sources of funds are sufficient to meet current and ongoing operating costs for the foreseeable future, and to pay part of the Asset Management Fee.
As disclosed on the statement of cash flows, the Series had a net loss of $407,619 for the period ending March 31, 2002. After adjusting for Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships of $355,237 and the changes in operating assets and liabilities, net cash used in operating activities was $17,167 of which $17,846 was the Asset Management Fee actually paid. Cash provided by investing activities totaled $35,810 consisting of $14,461 received in cash distributions from the Project Partnerships and $21,349 from matured Zero Coupon Treasuries. Management believes the sources of funds are sufficient to meet current and ongoing operating costs for the foreseeable future, and to pay part of the Asset Management Fee. There were no unusual events or trends to describe.
Series 10 - Gateway closed this Series on January 21, 1994 after receiving $5,043,000 from 325 Limited Partner investors. As of March 31, 2002, the series had invested $3,914,672 in 15 Project Partnerships located in 10 states containing 409 apartment units. Average occupancy of the Project Partnerships was 95% at December 31, 2001.
The Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships decreased from $292,747 for the year ended March 31, 2001 to $191,862 for the year ended March 31, 2002 as a result of not including losses of $60,069, as these losses would reduce the investment in certain Project Partnerships below zero. Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships of $299,182 for the year ended March 31, 2000 were comparable to Equity in Losses for the year ended March 31, 2001. (These Project Partnerships reported depreciation and amortization of $502,179, $496,926 and $478,396 for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000, and 2001 respectively.) Overall management believes the Project Partnerships are operating as expected and are generating tax credits, which meet projections.
At March 31, 2002, the Series had $252,149 of short-term investments (Cash and Cash Equivalents). It also had $189,635 in Zero Coupon Treasuries with annual maturities providing $27,000 in fiscal year 2003 increasing to $40,000 in fiscal year 2010. Management believes the sources of funds are sufficient to meet current and ongoing operating costs for the foreseeable future, and to pay part of the Asset Management Fee.
As disclosed on the statement of cash flows, the Series had net loss of $227,243 for the year ending March 31, 2002. After adjusting for Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships of $191,862 and the changes in operating assets and liabilities, net cash used in operating activities was $21,945 of which $26,216 was the Asset Management Fee actually paid. Cash provided by investing activities totaled $37,572 consisting of $21,886 received in cash distributions from the Project Partnerships and $15,686 from matured Zero Coupon Treasuries. Management believes the sources of funds are sufficient to meet current and ongoing operating costs for the foreseeable future, and to pay part of the Asset Management Fee. There were no unusual events or trends to describe.
Series 11 - Gateway closed this Series on April 29, 1994 after receiving $5,127,000 from 330 Limited investors. As of March 31, 2002 the series had invested $4,128,042 in 12 Project Partnerships located in 7 states containing 361 apartments. Average occupancy of the Project Partnerships was 92% at December 31, 2001.
Equity in losses of Project Partnerships were comparable for the years ended March 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002. (These Project Partnerships reported depreciation and amortization of $516,489, $516,766 and $524,869 for the periods ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001.) Overall management believes the Project Partnerships are operating as expected and are generating tax credits which meet projections.
At March 31, 2001, the Series had $266,059 of short-term investments (Cash and Cash Equivalents). It also had $212,848 in Zero Coupon Treasuries with annual maturities providing $30,000 in fiscal year 2003 increasing to $44,000 in fiscal year 2010. Management believes the sources of funds are sufficient to meet current and ongoing operating costs for the foreseeable future, and to pay part of the Asset Management Fee.
As disclosed on the statement of cash flows, the Series had net loss of $209,234 for the year ending March 31, 2002. After adjusting for Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships of $180,099 and the changes in operating assets and liabilities, net cash used in operating activities was $23,338 of which $31,172 was the Asset Management Fee actually paid. Cash provided by investing activities totaled $45,058 consisting of $16,330 from matured Zero Coupon Treasures and $28,728 received in cash distributions from Project Partnerships. Management believes the sources of funds are sufficient to meet current and ongoing operating costs for the foreseeable future, and to pay part of the Asset Management Fee. There were no unusual events or trends to describe.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Partners of Gateway Tax Credit Fund III Ltd.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of each of the five Series (Series 7 through 11) constituting Gateway Tax Credit Fund III Ltd. (a Florida Limited Partnership) as of March 31, 2002 and 2001 and the related statements of operations, members equity, and cash flows of each of the five Series for years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of certain Project Partnerships for which cumulative equity in losses included on the balance sheets as of March 31, 2002 and 2001 and net losses included on the statements of operations for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2002 are:
Cumulative Equity |
|
||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
Series 7 |
$4,262,598 |
$4,096,590 |
$ 166,008 |
$301,031 |
$357,271 |
Series 8 |
4,150,404 |
3,996,490 |
153,916 |
270,179 |
837,764 |
Series 9 |
1,077,602 |
879,822 |
179,779 |
174,853 |
173,999 |
Series 10 |
485,619 |
400,455 |
85,164 |
93,627 |
97,059 |
Series 11 |
1,047,897 |
878,172 |
169,727 |
157,100 |
148,088 |
Those statements were audited by other auditors whose reports have been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for such underlying partnerships, is based solely on the reports of the other auditors.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the reports of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of other auditors, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of each of the five Series (Series 7 through 11) constituting Gateway Tax Credit Fund III Ltd. as of March 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The schedules listed under Item 14(a)(2) in the index are presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and are not part of the basic financial statements. These schedules have been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of other auditors, fairly stated in all material respects the financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Spence Marston, Bunch, Morris & Co.
SPENCE, MARSTON, BUNCH, MORRIS & CO.
Certified Public Accountants
Clearwater, Florida
June 21, 2002
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
MARCH 31, 2002 AND 2001
SERIES 7 |
2002 |
2001 |
ASSETS |
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
MARCH 31, 2002 AND 2001
SERIES 8 |
2002 |
2001 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
MARCH 31, 2002 AND 2001
SERIES 9 |
2002 |
2001 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
MARCH 31, 2002 AND 2001
SERIES 10 |
2002 |
2001 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
MARCH 31, 2002 AND 2001
SERIES 11 |
2002 |
2001 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
MARCH 31, 2002 AND 2001
TOTAL SERIES 7 -11 |
2002 |
2001 |
||
ASSETS |
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,
SERIES 7 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,
SERIES 8 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
Revenues: |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,
SERIES 9 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
Revenues: |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,
SERIES 10 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,
SERIES 11 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
Revenues: |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,
TOTAL SERIES 7 - 11 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
Revenues: |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY (deficit)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:
|
Limited |
General |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY (deficit)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:
|
Limited |
General |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY (deficit)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:
|
Limited |
General |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY (deficit)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:
|
Limited |
General |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY (deficit)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:
|
Limited |
General |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY (deficit)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:
|
Limited |
General |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:
SERIES 7 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:
SERIES 8 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:
SERIES 9 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:
SERIES 10 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:
SERIES 11 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:
TOTAL SERIES 7 - 11 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION:
Gateway Tax Credit Fund III Ltd. ("Gateway"), a Florida Limited Partnership, was formed October 17, 1991 under the laws of Florida. Gateway offered its limited partnership interests in Series. The first Series for Gateway is Series 7. Operations commenced on July 16, 1992 for Series 7, January 4, 1993 for Series 8, September 30, 1993 for Series 9, January 21, 1994 for Series 10 and April 29, 1994 for Series 11. Each Series invests, as a limited partner, in other limited partnerships ("Project Partnerships"), each of which owns and operates apartment complexes eligible for Low-Income Housing Tax Credits ("Tax Credits"), provided for in Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Gateway will terminate on December 31, 2040 or sooner, in accordance with the terms of the Limited Partnership Agreement. As of March 31, 2002, Gateway had received capital contributions of $1,000 from the General Partners and $36,799,000 from the investor Limited Partners.
Raymond James Partners, Inc. and Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc., wholly-owned subsidiaries of Raymond James Financial, Inc., are the General Partner and Managing General Partner, respectively. The Managing General Partner manages and controls the business of Gateway.
Gateway received capital contributions of $10,395,000, $9,980,000, $6,254,000, $5,043,000 and $5,127,000 from the investor Limited Partners in Series 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, respectively. Each Series will be treated as though it were a separate partnership, investing in a separate and distinct pool of Project Partnerships. Income or loss and all tax items from the Project Partnerships acquired by each Series will be specifically allocated among the limited partners of such Series.
Operating profits and losses, cash distributions from operations and Tax Credits from each Series are generally allocated 99% to the Limited Partners in that Series and 1% to the General Partners. Profit or loss and cash distributions from sales of property by each Series are allocated as formulated in the Limited Partnership Agreement.
NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Basis of Accounting
Gateway utilizes an accrual basis of accounting whereby revenues are recognized as earned and expenses are recognized as obligations are incurred.
Gateway accounts for its investments as the limited partner in Project Partnerships ("Investments in Project Partnerships"), using the equity method of accounting, because management believes that Gateway does not have a majority control of the major operating and financial policies of the Project Partnerships in which it invests, and reports the equity in losses of the Project Partnerships on a 3-month lag in the Statements of Operations. Under the equity method, the Investments in Project Partnerships initially include:
1) Gateway's capital contribution,
2) Acquisition fees paid to the General Partner for services rendered in selecting properties for acquisition, and
3) Acquisition expenses including legal fees, travel and other miscellaneous costs relating to acquiring properties.
Quarterly the Investments in Project Partnerships are increased or decreased as follows:
1) Increased for equity in income or decreased for equity in losses of the Project Partnerships,
2) Decreased for cash distributions received from the Project Partnerships, and
3) Decreased for the amortization of the acquisition fees and expenses.
Amortization is calculated on a straight line basis over 35 years, as this is the average estimated useful life of the underlying assets. The amortization expense is shown on the Statements of Operations.
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreements for the Project Partnerships, cash losses generated by the Project Partnerships are allocated to the general partners of those partnerships. In subsequent years, cash profits, if any, are first allocated to the general partners to the extent of the allocation of prior years' cash losses.
Since Gateway invests as a limited partner, and therefore is not obligated to fund losses or make additional capital contributions, it does not recognize losses from individual Project Partnerships to the extent that these losses would reduce the investment in those Project Partnerships below zero. The suspended losses will be used to offset future income from the individual Project Partnerships.
Gateway reviews its investments in Project Partnerships to determine if there has been any permanent impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investment may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the investment, Gateway recognizes an impairment loss. No impairment loss has been recognized in the accompanying financial statements.
Gateway, as a limited partner in the Project Partnerships, is subject to risks inherent in the ownership of property which are beyond its control, such as fluctuations in occupancy rates and operating expenses, variations in rental schedules, proper maintenance and continued eligibility of tax credits. If the cost of operating a property exceeds the rental income earned thereon, Gateway may deem it in its best interest to voluntarily provide funds in order to protect its investment.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
It is Gateway's policy to include short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less in Cash and Cash Equivalents. Short-term investments are comprised of money market mutual funds.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments which potentially subject Gateway to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash investments in a money market mutual fund that is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Raymond James Financial, Inc.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires the use of estimates that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. These estimates are based on management's knowledge and experience. Accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates.
Investment in Securities
Effective April 1, 1994, Gateway adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities ("FAS 115"). Under FAS 115, Gateway is required to categorize its debt securities as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale or trading securities, dependent upon Gateway's intent in holding the securities. Gateway's intent is to hold all of its debt securities (U. S. Treasury Security Strips) until maturity and to use these reserves to fund Gateway's ongoing operations. Interest income is recognized ratably on the U.S. Treasury Strips using the effective yield to maturity.
Offering and Commission Costs
Offering and commission costs are charged against Limited Partners' Equity upon admission of Limited Partners.
Income Taxes
No provision for income taxes has been made in these financial statements, as income taxes are a liability of the partners rather than of Gateway.
Reclassifications
For comparability, the 2000 and 2001 figures have been reclassified, where appropriate, to conform with the financial statement presentation used in 2002.
NOTE 3 - INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES:
The March 31, 2002 Balance Sheet includes Investment in Securities consisting of U.S. Treasury Security Strips which represents their cost, plus accreted interest income of $173,648 for Series 7, $152,244 for Series 8, $90,029 for Series 9, $81,136 for Series 10 and $93,656 for Series 11.
|
|
|
|
Series 7 |
$ 448,000 |
$ 349,760 |
$ 98,240 |
Series 8 |
420,000 |
331,606 |
88,394 |
Series 9 |
287,000 |
224,916 |
62,084 |
Series 10 |
257,000 |
189,635 |
67,365 |
Series 11 |
296,000 |
212,848 |
83,152 |
As of March 31, 2002, the cost and accreted interest of debt securities by contractual maturities is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
Due within 1 year |
$ 60,470 |
$ 55,888 |
$ 33,325 |
|
After 1 year through 5 years |
233,621 |
221,398 |
130,147 |
|
After 5 years through 10 years |
55,669 |
54,320 |
61,444 |
|
--------- |
--------- |
--------- |
||
Total Amount Carried on Balance Sheet |
$ 349,760 |
$ 331,606 |
$ 224,916 |
|
|
|
|
||
Due within 1 year |
$ 25,668 |
$ 28,271 |
$ 203,622 |
|
After 1 year through 5 years |
95,874 |
109,409 |
790,449 |
|
After 5 years through 10 years |
68,093 |
75,168 |
314,694 |
|
--------- |
--------- |
--------- |
||
Total Amount Carried on Balance Sheet |
$ 189,635 |
$ 212,848 |
$1,308,765 |
|
NOTE 4 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:
For the periods ended March 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 the General Partners and affiliates are entitled to compensation and reimbursement for costs and expenses incurred by Gateway as follows:
Asset Management Fee - The Managing General Partner is entitled to receive an annual asset management fee equal to the greater of (i) $2,000 for each limited partnership in which Gateway invests, as adjusted by the Consumer Price Index, or (ii) 0.275% of Gateway's gross proceeds from the sale of limited partnership interests. In either event (i) or (ii), the maximum amount may not exceed 0.2% of the aggregate cost (Gateway's capital contribution plus Gateway's share of the Properties' mortgage) of Gateway's interest in properties owned by the Project Partnerships. The asset management fee will be paid only after all other expenses of Gateway have been paid. These fees are included in the Statement of Operations.
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
Series 7 |
$ 87,394 |
$ 87,683 |
$ 87,952 |
Series 8 |
91,032 |
91,364 |
91,655 |
Series 9 |
50,027 |
50,178 |
50,319 |
Series 10 |
34,115 |
34,212 |
34,309 |
Series 11 |
28,770 |
29,087 |
28,465 |
Total |
$ 291,338 |
$ 292,524 |
$ 292,700 |
General and Administrative Expenses - The Managing General Partner is reimbursed for general and administrative expenses of Gateway on an accountable basis. This expense is included in the Statement of Operations.
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
Series 7 |
$ 20,917 |
$ 16,312 |
$ 14,609 |
Series 8 |
23,062 |
17,985 |
16,108 |
Series 9 |
12,872 |
10,038 |
8,991 |
Series 10 |
8,045 |
6,274 |
5,619 |
Series 11 |
6,436 |
5,019 |
4,495 |
Total |
$ 71,332 |
$ 55,628 |
$ 49,822 |
NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS:
SERIES 7
As of March 31, 2002, the Partnership had acquired a 99% interest in the profits, losses and tax credits as a limited partner in 39 Project Partnerships which own and operate government assisted multi-family housing complexes.
Cash flows from operations are allocated according to each Partnership agreement. Upon dissolution proceeds will be distributed according to each Partnership agreement.
The following is a summary of Investments in Project Partnerships as of:
MARCH 31, 2002 |
MARCH 31, 2001 |
||
Capital Contributions to Project Partner- ships and purchase price paid for limited partner interests in Project Partnerships |
|
|
(1) In accordance with the Partnership's accounting policy to not carry Investments in Project Partnerships below zero, cumulative suspended losses of $1,932,905 for the year ended March 31, 2002 and cumulative suspended losses of $1,220,839 for the year ended March 31, 2001 are not included.
NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):
SERIES 8
As of March 31, 2002, the Partnership had acquired a 99% interest in the profits, losses and tax credits as a limited partner in 43 Project Partnerships which own and operate government assisted multi-family housing complexes.
Cash flows from operations are allocated according to each Partnership agreement.
Upon dissolution proceeds will be distributed according to each Partnership agreement.
The following is a summary of Investments in Project Partnerships as of:
MARCH 31, 2002 |
MARCH 31, 2001 |
||
Capital Contributions to Project Partner- ships and purchase price paid for limited partner interests in Project Partnerships |
|
|
(1) In accordance with the Partnership's accounting policy to not carry Investments in Project Partnerships below zero, cumulative suspended losses of $2,199,653 for the year ended March 31, 2002 and cumulative suspended losses of $1,367,552 for the year ended March 31, 2001 are not included.
NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):
SERIES 9
As of March 31, 2002, the Partnership had acquired a 99% interest in the profits, losses and tax credits as a limited partner in 24 Project Partnerships which own and operate government assisted multi-family housing complexes.
Cash flows from operations are allocated according to each Partnership agreement.
Upon dissolution proceeds will be distributed according to each Partnership agreement.
The following is a summary of Investments in Project Partnerships as of:
MARCH 31, 2002 |
MARCH 31, 2001 |
||
Capital Contributions to Project Partner- ships and purchase price paid for limited partner interests in Project Partnerships |
|
|
(1) In accordance with the Partnership's accounting policy to not carry Investments in Project Partnerships below zero, cumulative suspended losses of $579,368 for the year ended March 31, 2002 and cumulative suspended losses of $279,195 for the year ended March 31, 2001 are not included.
NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):
SERIES 10
As of March 31, 2002, the Partnership had acquired a 99% interest in the profits, losses and tax credits as a limited partner in 15 Project Partnerships which own and operate government assisted multi-family housing complexes.
Cash flows from operations are allocated according to each Partnership agreement.
Upon dissolution proceeds will be distributed according to each Partnership agreement.
The following is a summary of Investments in Project Partnerships as of:
MARCH 31, 2002 |
MARCH 31, 2001 |
||
Capital Contributions to Project Partner- ships and purchase price paid for limited partner interests in Project Partnerships |
|
|
|
(1) In accordance with the Partnership's accounting policy to not carry Investments in Project Partnerships below zero, cumulative suspended losses of $60,069 for the year ended March 31, 2002 and cumulative suspended losses of $0 for the year ended March 31, 2001 are not included.
NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):
SERIES 11
As of March 31, 2002, the Partnership had acquired a 99% interest in the profits, losses and tax credits as a limited partner in 12 Project Partnerships which own and operate government assisted multi-family housing complexes.
Cash flows from operations are allocated according to each Partnership agreement.
Upon dissolution proceeds will be distributed according to each Partnership agreement.
The following is a summary of Investments in Project Partnerships as of:
MARCH 31, 2002 |
MARCH 31, 2001 |
||
Capital Contributions to Project Partner- ships and purchase price paid for limited partner interests in Project Partnerships |
|
|
NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):
The following is a summary of Investments in Project Partnerships:
TOTAL SERIES 7 - 11 |
MARCH 31, 2002 |
MARCH 31, 2001 |
|
Capital Contributions to Project Partner- ships and purchase price paid for limited partner interests in Project Partnerships |
|
|
NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):
In accordance with the Partnership's policy of presenting the financial information
of the Project Partnerships on a three month lag, below is the summarized financial information for the Series' Project Partnerships as of December 31 of each year:
DECEMBER 31, |
|||
SERIES 7 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
SUMMARIZED BALANCE SHEETS |
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2001, the largest Project Partnership constituted 5.2% and 5.4%, and as of December 31, 2000 the largest Project Partnership constituted 5.3% and 5.3% of the combined total assets by series and combined total revenues by series, respectively.
NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):
In accordance with the Partnership's policy of presenting the financial information of the Project Partnerships on a three month lag, below is the summarized financial information for the Series' Project Partnerships as of December 31 of each year:
DECEMBER 31, |
|||||
SERIES 8 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
||
SUMMARIZED BALANCE SHEETS |
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2001, the largest Project Partnership constituted 5.6% and 5.7%, and as of December 31, 2000 the largest Project Partnership constituted 5.6% and 5.8% of the combined total assets by series and combined total revenues by series, respectively.
NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):
In accordance with the Partnership's policy of presenting the financial information of the Project Partnerships on a three month lag, below is the summarized financial information for the Series' Project Partnerships as of December 31 of each year:
DECEMBER 31, |
|||||
SERIES 9 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
||
SUMMARIZED BALANCE SHEETS |
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2001, the largest Project Partnership constituted 10.7 % and 8.5%, and as of December 31, 2000 the largest Project Partnership constituted 7.5% and 7.1% of the combined total assets by series and combined total revenues by series, respectively.
NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):
In accordance with the Partnership's policy of presenting the financial information of the Project Partnerships on a three month lag, below is the summarized financial information for the Series' Project Partnerships as of December 31 of each year:
DECEMBER 31, |
|
||||
SERIES 10 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
||
SUMMARIZED BALANCE SHEETS |
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2001, the largest Project Partnership constituted 11.0% and 12.9%, and as of December 31, 2000 the largest Project Partnership constituted 11.0% and 12.8% of the combined total assets by series and combined total revenues by series, respectively.
NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):
In accordance with the Partnership's policy of presenting the financial information of the Project Partnerships on a three month lag, below is the summarized financial information for the Series' Project Partnerships as of December 31 of each year:
DECEMBER 31, |
|||||
SERIES 11 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
||
SUMMARIZED BALANCE SHEETS |
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2001, the largest Project Partnership constituted 21.1% and 20.7%, and as of December 31, 2000 the largest Project Partnership constituted 20.5% and 20.8% of the combined total assets by series and combined total revenues by series, respectively.
NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):
In accordance with the Partnership's policy of presenting the financial information of the Project Partnerships on a three month lag, below is the summarized financial information for the Series' Project Partnerships as of December 31 of each year:
DECEMBER 31, |
|||||
TOTAL SERIES 7 - 11 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
||
SUMMARIZED BALANCE SHEETS |
|
|
|
NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):
The Partnership's equity by Series as reflected by the Project Partnerships differs from the Partnership's Investments in Partnerships before acquisition fees and expenses and amortization by Series primarily because of suspended losses on the Partnership's books.
Equity Per Project Partnership |
Equity Per |
|
Series 7 |
$(1,213,146) |
$ 816,730 |
NOTE 6 - TAXABLE INCOME (LOSS):
The following is a reconciliation between Net Income (Loss) as described in the financial statements and the Partnership income (loss) for tax purposes:
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to convert March 31, fiscal year end to December 31, taxable year end |
|
|
|
Items Expensed for Financial Statement purposes not expensed for Tax purposes: |
|
|
|
Partnership loss for tax purposes as of December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
The differences in the assets and liabilities of the Series for financial reporting purposes and tax reporting purposes for the year ended March 31, 2002 are as follows:
Financial Tax
Reporting Reporting
Purposes Purposes
Differences
Investments in Local
Limited Partnerships $1,436,847 $(1,863,148) $ 3,299,995
Other Assets $ 734,386 $ 1,910,471 $(1,176,085)
Liabilities $ 465,169 $ 9,899 $ 455,270
NOTE 6 - TAXABLE INCOME (LOSS):
The following is a reconciliation between Net Income (Loss) as described in the financial statements and the Partnership income (loss) for tax purposes:
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to convert March 31, fiscal year end to December 31, taxable year end |
|
|
|
Items Expensed for Financial Statement purposes not expensed for Tax purposes: |
|
|
|
Partnership loss for tax purposes as of December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
The differences in the assets and liabilities of the Series for financial reporting purposes and tax reporting purposes for the year ended March 31, 2002 are as follows:
Financial Tax
Reporting Reporting
Purposes Purposes Differences
Investments in Local
Limited Partnerships $ 654,569 $(2,260,786) $ 2,915,355
Other Assets $ 787,962 $ 1,961,746 $(1,173,784)
Liabilities $ 519,387 $ 10,776 $ 508,611
NOTE 6 - TAXABLE INCOME (LOSS):
The following is a reconciliation between Net Income (Loss) as described in the financial statements and the Partnership income (loss) for tax purposes:
SERIES 9 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to convert March 31, fiscal year end to December 31, taxable year end |
|
|
|
Items Expensed for Financial Statement purposes not expensed for Tax purposes: |
|
|
|
Partnership loss for tax purposes as of December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
The differences in the assets and liabilities of the Series for financial reporting purposes and tax reporting purposes for the year ended March 31, 2002 are as follows:
Financial Tax
Reporting Reporting
Purposes Purposes Differences
Investments in Local
Limited Partnerships $ 1,506,444 $ 50,979 $ 1,455,465
Other Assets $ 476,247 $ 1,216,153 $ (739,906)
Liabilities $ 313,821 $ 6,150 $ 307,671
NOTE 6 - TAXABLE INCOME (LOSS):
The following is a reconciliation between Net Income (Loss) as described in the financial statements and the Partnership income (loss) for tax purposes:
SERIES 10 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to convert March 31, fiscal year end to December 31, taxable year end |
|
|
|
Items Expensed for Financial Statement purposes not expensed for Tax purposes: |
|
|
|
Partnership loss for tax purposes as of December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
The differences in the assets and liabilities of the Series for financial reporting purposes and tax reporting purposes for the year ended March 31, 2002 are as follows:
Financial Tax
Reporting Reporting
Purposes Purposes Differences
Investments in Local
Limited Partnerships $ 2,232,728 $ 1,050,099 $ 1,182,629
Other Assets $ 441,784 $ 1,027,419 $ (585,635)
Liabilities $ 106,943 $ 4,117 $ 102,826
NOTE 6 - TAXABLE INCOME (LOSS):
The following is a reconciliation between Net Income (Loss) as described in the financial statements and the Partnership income (loss) for tax purposes:
SERIES 11 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to convert March 31, fiscal year end to December 31, taxable year end |
|
|
|
Items Expensed for Financial Statement purposes not expensed for Tax purposes: |
|
|
|
Partnership loss for tax purposes as of December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
The differences in the assets and liabilities of the Series for financial reporting purposes and tax reporting purposes for the year ended March 31, 2002 are as follows:
Financial Tax
Reporting Reporting
Purposes Purposes Differences
Investments in Local
Limited Partnerships $ 3,111,560 $ 2,777,060 $ 334,500
Other Assets $ 478,907 $ 919,967 $ (441,060)
Liabilities $ 51,436 $ 3,562 $ 47,874
NOTE 6 - TAXABLE INCOME (LOSS):
The following is a reconciliation between Net Income (Loss) as described in the financial statements and the Partnership income (loss) for tax purposes:
TOTAL SERIES 7 - 11 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to convert March 31, fiscal year end to December 31, taxable year end |
|
|
|
Items Expensed for Financial Statement purposes not expensed for Tax purposes: |
|
|
|
Partnership loss for tax purposes as of December 31 |
|
|
|
The difference in the total value of the Partnership's Investment in Project Partnerships is approximately $3,300,000 higher for Series 7, $2,915,000 higher for Series 8, $1,455,000 higher for Series 9, $1,183,000 higher for Series 10 and $335,000 higher for Series 11 for financial reporting purposes than for tax return purposes because (i) there were depreciation differences between financial reporting purposes and tax return purposes and (ii) certain expenses are not deductible for tax return purposes.
The differences in the assets and liabilities of the Fund for financial reporting purposes and tax reporting purposes for the year ended March 31, 2002 are as follows:
Financial Tax
Reporting Reporting
Purposes Purposes Differences
Investments in Local
Limited Partnerships $ 8,942,148 $ (245,796) $ 9,187,944
Other Assets $ 2,919,286 $ 7,035,756 $(4,116,470)
Liabilities $ 1,456,756 $ 34,504 $ 1,422,252
NOTE 7 - SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED):
Series 7
Year 2002 Quarter 1
Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4
6/30/2001 9/30/2001 12/31/2001 3/31/2002
Total Revenues $ 10,331 $ 9,588 $ 8,589 $ 32,301
Net Income (Loss) $(104,287) $(114,728) $(104,218) $ (66,977)
Earnings (Loss) Per
Weighted Average
Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding $ (9.93) $ (11.04) $ (9.81) $ (6.38)
Series 8
Year 2002 Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4
6/30/2001 9/30/2001 2/31/2001 3/31/2002
Total Revenues $ 10,503 $ 9,489 $ 8,227 $ 17,436
Net Income (Loss) $(123,048) $ (72,011) $(164,343) $ (6,363)
Earnings (Loss) Per
Weighted Average
Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding $ (12.21) $ (7.22) $ (16.22) $ (0.63)
Series 9
Year 2002 Quarter 1 Quarter 2
Quarter 3 Quarter 4
6/30/2001 9/30/2001 12/31/2001 3/31/2002
Total Revenues $ 6,012 $ 5,500 $ 4,861 $ 9,088
Net Income (Loss) $ (88,925) $(106,134) $(143,554) $ (69,006)
Earnings (Loss) Per
Weighted Average
Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding $ (14.08) $ (16.80) $ (22.72) $ (10.93)
NOTE 7 - SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)(Continued):
Series 10
Year 2002 Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4
6/30/2001 9/30/2001 12/31/2001 3/31/2002
Total Revenues $ 5,814 $ 5,332 $ 4,671 $ 3,976
Net Income (Loss) $ (72,931) $ (67,301) $ (76,067) $ (10,944)
Earnings (Loss) Per
Weighted Average
Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding $ (14.32) $ (13.21) $ (14.93) $ (2.15)
Series 7 - 11
Year 2002 Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4
6/30/2001 9/30/2001 12/31/2001 3/31/2002
Total Revenues $ 39,242 $ 35,987 $ 31,723 $ 67,589
Net Income (Loss) $(417,987) $(472,820) $(490,476) $(218,788)
NOTE 7 - SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) (Continued):
Series 7
Year 2001 Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4
6/30/2000 9/30/2000 12/31/2000 3/31/2001
Total Revenues $ 11,720 $ 11,934 $ 11,622 $ 23,777
Net Income (Loss) $(180,360) $(225,497) $ (32,627) $ (70,285)
Earnings (Loss) Per
Weighted Average
Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding $ (17.18) $ (21.47) $ (3.11) $ (6.69)
Series 8
Year 2001 Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4
6/30/2000 9/30/2000 12/31/2000 3/31/2001
Total Revenues $ 12,359 $ 12,650 $ 12,236 $ 18,323
Net Income (Loss) $(168,048) $(155,643) $ (47,165) $(168,910)
Earnings (Loss) Per
Weighted Average
Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding $ (16.67) $ (15.44) $ (4.68) $ (16.75)
Series 9
Year 2001 Quarter 1
Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4
6/30/2000 9/30/2000 12/31/2000 3/31/2001
Total Revenues $ 6,832 $ 7,015 $ 6,869 $ 8,152
Net Income (Loss) $(157,151) $(152,279) $ (98,315) $ (49,432)
Earnings (Loss) Per
Weighted Average
Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding $ (24.88) $ (24.11) $ (15.56) $ (7.82)
NOTE 7 - SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)(Continued):
Series 10
Year 2001 Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4
6/30/2000 9/30/2000 12/31/2000 3/31/2001
Total Revenues $ 6,779 $ 6,947 $ 6,721 $ 6,135
Net Income (Loss) $(102,398) $(122,831) $ 914 $ (96,792)
Earnings (Loss) Per
Weighted Average
Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding $ (20.10) $ (24.12) $ (0.18) $ (19.00)
Series 11
Year 2001 Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4
6/30/2000 9/30/2000 12/31/2000 3/31/2001
Total Revenues $ 7,456 $ 7,605 $ 7,404 $ 6,981
Net Income (Loss) $ (65,832) $ (93,747) $ 28,984 $ (71,795)
Earnings (Loss) Per
Weighted Average
Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding $ (12.72) $ (18.10) $ 5.60 $ (13.86)
Series 7 - 11
Year 2001 Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4
6/30/2000 9/30/2000 12/31/2000 3/31/2001
Total Revenues $ 45,146 $ 46,151 $ 44,852 $ 63,368
Net Income (Loss) $(673,789) $(749,997) $(148,209) $(457,214)
Hill, Barth & King LLC
5121 Zuck Road
Erie, PA 16506
PHONE: 814-836-9968
FAX: 814-836-9989
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
----------------------------
To the Partners
Maple Street Apartments Limited Partnership
Emporium, Pennsylvania
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Maple Street Apartments Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and the significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Maple Street Apartments Limited Partnership of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 25, 2002 on our consideration of Maple Street Apartments Limited Partnership internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.
/s/ Hill, Barth & King LLC
Certified Public Accountants
January 25, 2002
Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP
5565 Glendridge Connector, Suite 200
Atlanta, GA 30342
PHONE: 404-892-9651
FAX: 404-876-3913
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
------------------------------
To the Partners
Creekstone Apartments, L.P.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of CREEKSTONE APARTMENTS, L.P. (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CREEKSTONE APARTMENTS, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, its changes in partners equity (deficit), and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Atlanta, Georgia
January 25, 2002
Blackman & Associates, P.C.
17445 Arbor Street, Suite 200
Omaha, Nebraska 68130
PHONE: 402-330-1040
FAX: 402-333-9189
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
-----------------------------
To the Partners of
Gila Bend Housing, Ltd.
(An Arizona Limited Partnership)
We have audited the balance sheets of Gila Bend Housing, Ltd. (an Arizona Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the Farmers Home Administration regulations as set forth in the FmHA Audit Guide dated December, 1989, specifically, Attachment 2 relating to Rural Rental Housing Loans. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Gila Bend Housing, Ltd. (An Arizona Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 24, 2002, on our consideration of the Partnership's internal controls and a report dated January 24, 2002, on its compliance with laws and regulations. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.
The accompanying supplementary information is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.
This report is intended solely for the information of the Partners, management of Gila Bend Housing, Ltd. and for filing with RD and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.
/s/ Blackman & Associates, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
January 24, 2002
Omaha, Nebraska
Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP
5565 Glenridge Connector, Suite 200
Atlanta, GA 30342
PHONE: 404-892-9651
FAX: 404-876-3913
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
-------------------------------
To the Partners
Manchester Elderly Housing, L.L.P.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of MANCHESTER ELDERLY HOUSING, L.L.P. (USDA Rural Development Case No. 10-099-581965616), a limited partnership, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration's Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MANCHESTER ELDERLY HOUSING, L.L.P. as of December 31, 2001and 2000, and the results of its operations, its changes in partners equity (deficit), and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 25, 2002, on our consideration of MANCHESTER ELDERLY HOUSING, L.L.P.'s internal control and a report dated January 25, 2002, on its compliance with laws and regulations applicable to the financial statements. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 12-14 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Atlanta, Georgia
January 25, 2002
Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
3488 N. Valdosta Rd. - P.O. Box 2241
Valdosta, GA 31604-2241
PHONE: 229-245-6040
FAX: 229-245-1669
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
-------------------------------
To the Partners
Meadow Run Apartments, L.P.
Valdosta, Georgia
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Meadow Run Apartments, L.P. (a limited partnership), Federal ID #:58-1994614, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Meadow Run Apartments, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued reports dated January 29, 2002, on our consideration of Meadow Run Apartments, L.P.'s internal control structure and its compliance with laws and regulations. These reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.
/s/ Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
January 29, 2002
Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
3488 N. Valdosta Rd. - P.O. Box 2241
Valdosta, GA 31604-2241
PHONE: 229-245-6040
FAX: 229-245-1669
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
------------------------------
To the Partners
Mt. Vernon Rental Housing, L.P.
Valdosta, Georgia
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Mt. Vernon Rental Housing, L.P. (a limited partnership), Federal ID #:58-1965613, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Mt. Vernon Rental Housing, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting standards generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued reports dated January 29, 2002, on our consideration of Mt. Vernon Rental Housing, L.P.'s internal control structure and a report dated January 29, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations. These reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.
/s/ Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
January 29, 2002
Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
3488 N. Valdosta Rd. - P.O. Box 2241
Valdosta, GA 31604-2241
PHONE: 229-245-6040
FAX: 229-245-1669
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
-------------------------------
To the Partners
Lakeland II L.P.
Lakeland, Georgia
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Lakeland II, L.P. (a limited partnership), Federal ID #58-1965624, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lakeland II, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued reports dated January 29, 2002, on our consideration of Lakeland II, L.P.'s internal control structure and its compliance with laws and regulations. These reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.
/s/ Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
January 29, 2002
Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
3488 N. Valdosta Rd. - P.O. Box 2241
Valdosta, GA 31604-2241
PHONE: 229-245-6040
FAX: 229-245-1669
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
--------------------------------
To the Partners
Blue Ridge Elderly Housing, L.P.
Valdosta, Georgia
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Blue Ridge Elderly Housing, L.P. (a limited partnership), Federal ID No.: 58-1936981 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Blue Ridge Elderly Housing, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards we have also issued a report dated January 29, 2002 on our consideration of Blue Ridge Elderly Housing, L.P.'s internal control structure and a report dated January 29, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations. These reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.
/s/ Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
January 29, 2002
Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
3488 N. Valdosta Rd. - P.O. Box 2241
Valdosta, GA 31604-2241
PHONE: 229-245-6040
FAX: 229-245-1669
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
-------------------------------
To the Partners
Arbor Trace Apartments Phase II, L.P.
Lake Park, Georgia
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Arbor Trace Apartments Phase II, L.P. (a limited partnership), Federal ID No. 58-2032771 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Arbor Trace Apartments Phase II, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 29, 2002 on our consideration of Arbor Trace Apartments Phase II, L.P.'s internal control structure and a report dated January 29, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations. These reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.
/s/ Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
January 29, 2002
Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP
5565 Glenridge Connector, Suite 200
Atlanta, GA 30342
PHONE: 404-892-9651
FAX: 404-876-3913
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
-------------------------------
To the Partners
Omega Rental Housing, L.P.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of OMEGA RENTAL HOUSING, L.P., (RHS Project No.11-037-582031602) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards, Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration's Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of OMEGA RENTAL HOUSING, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, its changes in partners equity, and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 18, 2002 on our consideration of OMEGA RENTAL HOUSING, L.P.'s internal control and a report dated January 18, 2002, on its compliance with laws and regulations applicable to the financial statements.
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on page 11 - 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Atlanta, Georgia
January 18, 2002
Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP
5565 Glenridge Connector, Suite 200
Atlanta, GA 30342
PHONE: 404-892-9651
FAX: 404-876-3913
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
--------------------------------
To the Partners
Magnolia Place, L.P.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of MAGNOLIA PLACE, L.P. (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MAGNOLIA PLACE, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, its changes in partners' equity, and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Atlanta, Georgia
January 18, 2002
Baird, Kurtz & Dobson, LLP
5000 Rogers Avenue, Suite 700
Fort Smith, AR 72903-2079
PHONE: 501-452-1040
FAX: 501-452-5542
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
--------------------------------
Partners
Antlers Properties I, A Limited Partnership
D/B/A Woodbine Apartments
Fort Smith, Arkansas
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Antlers Properties I, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Woodbine Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Antlers Properties I, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Woodbine Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 7, 2002, on our consideration of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of the laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.
/s/ Baird, Kurtz & Dobson, LLP
Certified Public Accountants
February 7, 2002
Baird, Kurtz & Dobson, LLP
5000 Rogers Avenue, Suite 700
Fort Smith, AR 72903-2079
PHONE: 501-452-1040
FAX: 501-452-5542
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
-------------------------------
Partners
Meadowview Properties, A Limited Partnership
D/B/A Meadowview Apartments
Fort Smith, Arkansas
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Meadowview Properties, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Meadowview Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Meadowview Properties, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Meadowview Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 7, 2002, on our consideration of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of the laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.
/s/ Baird, Kurtz & Dobson, LLP
Certified Public Accountants
February 7, 2002
Eide Bailly LLP
200 E. 10th Street, Suite 500-P.O. Box 5126
Sioux Falls, SD 57117-5126
PHONE: 605-339-1999
FAX: 605-339-1306
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
-------------------------------
The Partners
Sunrise I Apartments Limited Partnership
Sioux Falls, South Dakota
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Sunrise I Apartments Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Sunrise I Apartments Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 15, 2002 on our consideration of Sunrise I Apartments Limited Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.
Our audits were performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplementary information on pages 11 and 12 is presented for the purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements of Sunrise I Apartments Limited Partnership. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Eide Bailly LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Sioux Falls, South Dakota
January 15, 2002
Miller & Rose, P.L.L.C.
1309 E. Race Avenue
Searcy, AR 72143
PHONE: 501-268-8356
FAX: 501-268-9362
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
--------------------------------
Partners
Pioneer Apartments, An Arkansas Limited Partnership
D/B/A Pioneer Apartments
351 E. 4th Street
Mountain Home, AR 72653
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Pioneer Apartments, An Arkansas Limited Partnership D/B/A Pioneer Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and for the years then ended, as listed in the table of contents. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statements presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pioneer Apartments, An Arkansas Limited Partnership D/B/A Pioneer Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated March 7, 2002 on our consideration of Pioneer Apartments, An Arkansas Limited Partnership D/B/A Pioneer Apartments' internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants.
/s/ Miller & Rose, P.L.L.C.
Certified Public Accountants
March 7, 2002
Miller & Rose, P.L.L.C.
1309 E. Race Avenue
Searcy, AR 72143
PHONE: 501-268-8356
FAX: 501-268-9362
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
-------------------------------
Partners
Cardinal Apartments, An Arkansas Limited Partnership
D/B/A Cardinal Apartments
351 E. 4th Street
Mountain Home, AR 72653
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Cardinal Apartments, An Arkansas Limited Partnership D/B/A Cardinal Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and for the years then ended, as listed in the table of contents. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statements presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cardinal Apartments, An Arkansas Limited Partnership, D/B/A Cardinal Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Miller & Rose, P.L.L.C.
Certified Public Accountants
March 22, 2002
Bernard Robinson & Company, L.L.P.
109 Muirs Chapel Rd.-P.O. Box 19608
Greensboro, NC 27419-9608
PHONE: 336-294-4494
FAX: 336-547-0840
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
--------------------------------
To the Partners
Peachtree Associates Limited Partnership
Charlotte, North Carolina
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Peachtree Associates Limited Partnership (a South Carolina limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Peachtree Associates Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 31, 2002, on our consideration of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants.
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplementary information listed in the table of contents is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements of the Partnership. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Bernard Robinson & Company, L.L.P.
Certified Public Accountants
January 31, 2002
Thomas C. Cunningham, CPA PC
23 Moore Street
Bristol, VA 24201
PHONE: 276-669-5531
FAX: 276-669-5576
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
------------------------------
To the Partners
Mountain City Manor Limited Partnership
I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Mountain City Manor Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audits.
I conducted my audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audits provide a reasonable basis for my opinion.
In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Mountain City Manor Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' deficit, and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, I have also issued my report dated February 15, 2002 on my consideration of Mountain City Manor Limited Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and on my tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.
/s/ Thomas C. Cunningham, CPA PC
Certified Public Accountants
February 15, 2002
Thomas C. Cunningham, CPA PC
23 Moore Street
Bristol, VA 24201
PHONE: 276-669-5531
FAX: 276-669-5576
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
---------------------------------
To the Partners
Tazewell Village Limited Partnership
I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Tazewell Village Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audits.
I conducted my audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audits provide a reasonable basis for my opinion.
In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tazewell Village Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' deficit, and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, I have also issued my report dated February 15, 2002 on my consideration of Tazewell Village Limited Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and on my tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.
/s/ Thomas C. Cunningham, CPA PC
Certified Public Accountants
February 15, 2002
Thomas C. Cunningham, CPA PC
23 Moore Street
Bristol, VA 24201
PHONE: 276-669-5531
FAX: 276-669-5576
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
-----------------------------------
To the Partners
Jamestown Village Limited Partnership
I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Jamestown Village Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audits.
I conducted my audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audits provide a reasonable basis for my opinion.
In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Jamestown Village Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' deficit, and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, I have also issued my report dated February 15, 2002 on my consideration of Jamestown Village Limited Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and on my tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.
/s/ Thomas C. Cunningham, CPA PC
Certified Public Accountants
February 15, 2002
Thomas C. Cunningham, CPA PC
23 Moore Street
Bristol, VA 24201
PHONE: 276-669-5531
FAX: 276-669-5576
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
--------------------------------
To the Partners
Clinchview Manor Limited Partnership
I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Clinchview Manor Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audits.
I conducted my audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audits provide a reasonable basis for my opinion.
In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Clinchview Manor Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' deficit, and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, I have also issued my report dated February 15, 2002 on my consideration of Clinchview Manor Limited Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and on my tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.
/s/ Thomas C. Cunningham, CPA PC
Certified Public Accountants
February 15, 2002
Thomas C. Cunningham, CPA PC
23 Moore Street
Bristol, VA 24201
PHONE: 276-669-5531
FAX: 276-669-5576
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
------------------------------------
To the Partners
Warsaw Manor Limited Partnership
I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Warsaw Manor Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audits.
I conducted my audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audits provide a reasonable basis for my opinion.
In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Warsaw Manor Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity, and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, I have also issued my report dated February 15, 2002 on my consideration of Warsaw Manor Limited Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and on my tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.
/s/ Thomas C. Cunningham, CPA PC
Certified Public Accountant
February 15, 2002
Lou Ann Montey and Associates, P.C.
8400 N. Mopac Expressway, Suite 304
Austin, TX 78759
PHONE: 512-338-0044
FAX: 512-338-5395
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
-----------------------------------
To The Partners
Elsa Retirement, Ltd.-(A Texas Limited Partnership)
Burnet, Texas
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Elsa Retirement, Ltd.- (A Texas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income (loss), partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards and Government Auditing Standards as issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Elsa Retirement, Ltd.-(A Texas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 30, 2002, on our consideration of the internal control structure of Elsa Retirement, Ltd.-(A Texas Limited Partnership)and a report dated January 30, 2002, on its compliance with laws and regulations.
/s/ Lou Ann Montey and Associates, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
Austin, Texas
January 30, 2002
Lou Ann Montey and Associates, P.C.
8400 N. Mopac Expressway, Suite 304
Austin, TX 78759
PHONE: 512-338-0044
FAX: 512-338-5395
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
--------------------------------
To The Partners
Dilley Retirement, Ltd.-(A Texas Limited Partnership)
Burnet, Texas
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Dilley Retirement, Ltd. (A Texas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income (loss), partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards and Government Auditing Standards, as issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dilley Retirement, Ltd. (A Texas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 25, 2002, on our consideration of the internal control structure of Dilley Retirement, Ltd.-(A Texas Limited Partnership) and a report dated January 25, 2002, on its compliance with laws and regulations.
/s/ Lou Ann Montey and Associates, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
Austin, Texas
January 25, 2002
Lou Ann Montey and Associates, P.C.
8400 N. Mopac Expressway, Suite 304
Austin, TX 78759
PHONE: 512-338-0044
FAX: 512-338-5395
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
----------------------------------
To The Partners
Taylor Retirement, Ltd.-(A Texas Limited Partnership)
Burnet, Texas
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Taylor Retirement, Ltd. (A Texas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income (loss) and partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards and Government Auditing Standards as issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Taylor Retirement, Ltd.- (A Texas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 25, 2002, on our consideration of the internal control structure of Taylor Retirement, Ltd.-(A Texas Limited Partnership)and a report dated January 25, 2002, on its compliance with laws and regulations.
/s/ Lou Ann Montey and Associates, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
Austin, Texas
January 25, 2002
Lou Ann Montey and Associates, P.C.
8400 N. Mopac Expressway, Suite 304
Austin, TX 78759
PHONE: 512-338-0044
FAX: 512-338-5395
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
----------------------------------
To The Partners
Donna Retirement, Ltd.-(A Texas Limited Partnership)
Burnet, Texas
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Donna Retirement, Ltd.- (A Texas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income (loss), partners' equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audits in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards and Government Auditing Standards, as issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Donna Retirement, Ltd.- (A Texas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 24, 2002, on our consideration of the internal control structure of Donna Retirement, Ltd.- (A Texas Limited Partnership)and a report dated January 24, 2002, on its compliance with laws and regulations.
/s/ Lou Ann Montey and Associates, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
Austin, Texas
January 24, 2002
David G. Pelliccione, C.P.A., P.C.
340 Eisenhower Dr., Suite 220
Savannah, GA 31406
PHONE: 912-354-2334
FAX: 912-354-2443
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
-------------------------------
To The Partners
Brooks Lane Apartments, L.P.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of BROOKS LANE APARTMENTS, L.P., as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related statement of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of The Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards of the United States and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of BROOKS LANE APARTMENTS, L.P., as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 15, 2002, on our consideration of BROOKS LANE APARTMENTS, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements of BROOKS LANE APARTMENTS, L.P., taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 9 through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ David G. Pelliccione, C.P.A., P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
Savannah, Georgia
February 15, 2002
David G. Pelliccione, C.P.A., P.C.
340 Eisenhower Dr., Suite 220
Savannah, GA 31406
PHONE: 912-354-2334
FAX: 912-354-2443
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
--------------------------------
To The Partners
Brooks Field Apartments, L.P.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of BROOKS FIELD APARTMENTS, L.P., as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related statements of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of The Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards of the United States and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of BROOKS FIELD APARTMENTS, L.P., as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 15, 2002, on our consideration of BROOKS FIELD APARTMENTS, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements of BROOKS FIELD APARTMENTS, L.P., taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 9 through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ David G. Pelliccione, C.P.A., P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
Savannah, Georgia
February 15, 2002
David G. Pelliccione, C.P.A., P.C.
340 Eisenhower Dr., Suite 220
Savannah, GA 31406
PHONE: 912-354-2334
FAX: 912-354-2443
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
--------------------------------
To The Partners
Brooks Point Apartments, L.P.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of BROOKS POINT APARTMENTS, L.P., as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity and cash flow for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of The Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards of the United States and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of BROOKS POINT APARTMENTS, L.P., as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 15, 2002, on our consideration of BROOKS POINT APARTMENTS, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements of BROOK POINT APARTMENTS, L.P., taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 9 through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ David G. Pelliccione, C.P.A., P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
Savannah, Georgia
February 15, 2002
McCartney & Company, P.C.
2121 University Park Drive - Suite 150
Okemos, MI 48864
PHONE: 517-347-5000
FAX: 517-347-5007
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
---------------------------------
Partners
Mariner Cove Apartments Limited Partnership
DeWitt, Michigan
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Mariner Cove Apartments Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Mariner Cove Apartments Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated March 6, 2002, on our consideration of Mariner Cove Apartments Limited Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report considering the results of our audit.
/s/ McCartney & Company, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
March 6, 2002
Simmons and Clubb
410 S. Orchard, Suite 156
Boise, ID 83705
PHONE: 208-336-6800
FAX: 208-343-2381
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
--------------------------------
General Partner
South Brenchley Housing Limited Partnership
Boise, Idaho
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of South Brenchley Housing Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of South Brenchley Housing Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 19, 2002, on our consideration of South Brenchley's internal control structure, and a report dated January 19, 2002, on its compliance with specific requirements applicable to major programs. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.
The partnership's tax returns have been filed allowing the partners to claim a benefit of a low income housing tax credit. Because the compliance and qualification standards of the low income tax housing tax credit are not related to the interest credit agreement and loan agreement, and because the low income housing tax credit relates to income taxes which are the responsibility of each individual partner, the scope of our audit was not designed or intended to audit the partnerships compliance with the low income housing tax credit laws. Accordingly, our audit cannot be relied upon to give assurance with regard to the partnerships compliance with any of the low income housing tax credit laws.
/s/ Roger Clubb
Simmons and Clubb
Certified Public Accountants
Boise, Idaho
January 19, 2002
Gubler and Carter, P.C.
7001 South 900 East, Suite 240
Midvale, UT 84047
PHONE: 801-566-5866
FAX: 801-561-8693
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
--------------------------------
TO THE PARTNERS
HOMESTEAD WEST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Homestead West Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related statements of income, changes in partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statements presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Homestead West Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of its operations, changes in partners' capital, and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our reports dated February 4, 2002 on our consideration of Homestead West Limited Partnership's internal control and on its compliance with laws and regulations.
Our audits were conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplementary information shown on pages 13 through 15 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements of Homestead West Limited Partnership. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Gubler and Carter, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
Salt Lake City, Utah
February 4, 2002
Miller, Mayer, Sullivan & Stevens LLP
2365 Harrodsburg Rd.
Lexington, KY 40504-3399
PHONE: 859-223-3095
FAX: 859-223-2143
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
-------------------------------
To the Partners
Rural Development
Louisa Senior Apartments, Ltd.
Morehead, Kentucky
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Louisa Senior Apartments, Ltd., (a limited partnership) Case No. 20-064-407447188, as of December 31, 2001and 2000 and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards for financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Louisa Senior Apartments, Ltd. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 30, 2002 on our consideration of Louisa Senior Apartments, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.
Our audits were conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental data included in this report is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements, and in our opinion, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Miller, Mayer, Sullivan & Stevens, LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Lexington, Kentucky
January 30, 2002
Miller, Mayer, Sullivan & Stevens LLP
2365 Harrodsburg Rd.
Lexington, KY 40504-3399
PHONE: 859-223-3095
FAX: 859-223-2143
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
---------------------------------
To the Partners
Rural Development
Wells Hill Apartments, Ltd. Morehead, Kentucky
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Wells Hill Apartments, Ltd., (a limited partnership) Case No. 20-086-611204241, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards for financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Wells Hill Apartments, Ltd. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 31, 2002 on our consideration of Wells Hill Apartments, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.
Our audits were conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental data included in this report is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements, and in our opinion, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Miller, Mayer, Sullivan & Stevens LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Lexington, Kentucky
January 31, 2002
Eide Bailly LLP
200 E. 10th Street, Suite 500-P.O. Box 5126
Sioux Falls, SD 57117-5126
PHONE: 605-339-1999
FAX: 605-339-1306
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
------------------------------
The Partners
Lincoln, Ltd.
Pierre, South Dakota
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Lincoln, Ltd. (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lincoln, Ltd. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 24, 2002 on our consideration of Lincoln, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.
Our audits were performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplementary information on pages 11 and 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements of Lincoln, Ltd. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Eide Bailly LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Sioux Falls, South Dakota
January 24, 2002
Eide Bailly LLP
200 E. 10th Street, Suite 500-P.O. Box 5126
Sioux Falls, SD 57117-5126
PHONE: 605-339-1999
FAX: 605-339-1306
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
------------------------------
The Partners
Courtyard, Ltd.
Huron, South Dakota
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Courtyard, Ltd. (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Courtyard, Ltd. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 28, 2002, on our consideration of Courtyard, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.
Our audits were performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplementary information on pages 13 and 14 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements of Courtyard, Ltd. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Eide Bailly LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Sioux Falls, South Dakota
January 28, 2002
Brockway, Gersbach, McKinnon & Niemeier, P.C.
P.O. Box 4083
Temple, TX 76505-4083
PHONE: 254-773-9907
FAX: 254-773-1570
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
---------------------------------
The Partners
Leander Housing 1990, Ltd.
Leander, Texas
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Leander Housing 1990, Ltd. (a Texas limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related statements of operations, partners' capital (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Leander Housing 1990, Ltd. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Governmental Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 30, 2002, on our consideration of Leander Housing 1990, Ltd.'s internal control and on its compliance with laws and regulations applicable to the financial statements. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.
Our audits were conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 9 through 17 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Year End Report/Analysis (Form FmHA 1930-8); the Statement of Actual Budget and Income (Form FmHA 1930-7) for the year ended December 31, 2001, and the Supplemental Data Required by USDA Rural Development, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of USDA Rural Development and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Brockway, Gersbach, McKinnon & Niemeier, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
January 30, 2002
Johnson, Hickey & Murchison, P.C.
651 East Fourth Street, Suite 200
Chattanooga, TN 37403-1924
PHONE: 423-756-0052
FAX: 423-267-5945
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
--------------------------------
To the General Partners of
Pleasant Valley Apartments, L.P.:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Pleasant Valley Apartments, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pleasant Valley Apartments, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 17, 2002, on our consideration of the partnership's internal control over financial reporting and on its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.
/s/ Johnson, Hickey & Murchison, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
January 17, 2002
Johnson, Hickey & Murchison, P.C.
651 East Fourth Street, Suite 200
Chattanooga, TN 37403-1924
PHONE: 423-756-0052
FAX: 423-267-5945
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
-----------------------------
To the General Partners of
Brookwood Apartments, L.P.:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Brookwood Apartments, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Brookwood Apartments, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 15, 2002, on our consideration of the partnership's internal control over financial reporting and on its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.
/s/ Johnson, Hickey & Murchison, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
January 15, 2002
Johnson, Hickey & Murchison, P.C.
651 East Fourth Street, Suite 200
Chattanooga, TN 37403-1924
PHONE: 423-756-0052
FAX: 423-267-5945
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
----------------------------------
To the General Partners of
River Rest Apartments, L.P.:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of River Rest Apartments, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of River Rest Apartments, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 17, 2002, on our consideration of the partnership's internal control over financial reporting and on its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.
/s/ Johnson, Hickey & Murchison, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
January 17, 2002
Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP
5565 Glenridge Connector, Suite 200
Atlanta, GA 30342
PHONE: 404-892-9651
FAX: 404-876-3913
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
-------------------------------
To the Partners
Royston Elderly Housing, L.P.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of ROYSTON ELDERLY HOUSING, L.P. (USDA Rural Development Case No. 10-059-582088484), a limited partnership, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration's Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ROYSTON ELDERLY HOUSING, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, its changes in partners' equity (deficit), and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 25, 2002 on our consideration of ROYSTON ELDERLY HOUSING, L.P.'s internal control and a report dated January 25, 2002, on its compliance with laws and regulations applicable to the financial statements. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 12-14 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Atlanta, Georgia
January 25, 2002
Leavitt, Christensen & Co.
9100 W. Blackeagle Drive
Boise, ID 83709
PHONE: 208-322-6769
FAX: 208-322-7307
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
----------------------------------
Managing General Partner
Heritage Park Associates Limited Partnership
Boise, Idaho
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Heritage Park Associates Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the USDA, Rural Housing Service Audit Program issued in December 1989. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Heritage Park Associates Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued reports dated January 25, 2002 on our consideration of Heritage Park Associates Limited Partnership's internal control and on its compliance with laws and regulations. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.
The partnership has filed tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service which allow the partners to receive the benefit of a low income housing tax credit. Because the qualifying standards of the low income housing tax credit are different than the requirements of the loan agreement and the interest credit agreements, and due to the fact that the low income housing tax credit relates to income taxes which are the responsibility of the individual partners, the scope of these audits were not designed or intended to audit the compliance with the various low income housing tax credit laws. Therefore, these audits can not be relied on to give assurances with regard to compliance with any low income housing tax credit laws.
/s/ Leavitt, Christensen & Co.
Certified Public Accountants
January 25, 2002
Bob T. Robinson
2084 Dunbarton Drive
Jackson, MS 39216
PHONE: 601-982-3875
FAX: 601-982-3876
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
---------------------------------
To the Partners
Elderly Housing of Pontotoc, L.P.
I have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Elderly Housing of Pontotoc, L.P., (RD Case number 28-058-640818315), as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audit.
I conducted my audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audits provide a reasonable basis for my opinion.
In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Elderly Housing of Pontotoc, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, I have also issued a report dated February 1, 2002 on my consideration of the partnership's internal control structure and a report dated February 1, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations.
My audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information is presented for the purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements of Elderly Housing of Pontotoc, L.P. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and, in my opinion, is fairly presented in all material respects in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.
The annual budgets of Elderly Housing of Pontotoc, L.P. included in the accompanying prescribed form RD 1930-7 (Rev 10-96) have not been compiled or examined by me, and I do not express any form of assurance on them. In addition they may contain departures from guidelines for presentation of prospective financial information established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The actual results may vary from the presentation and the variations may be material.
/s/ Bob T. Robinson
Certified Public Accountant
February 1, 2002
Jackson, Mississippi
Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
516 Walnut Street-P.O. Box 775
Gadsden, AL 35902
PHONE: 256-543-3707
FAX: 256-543-9800
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
-------------------------------
To the Partners
Lakeshore II, Ltd.
Tuskegee, Alabama
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Lakeshore II, Ltd., a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-044-631056927 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lakeshore II, Ltd., RHS Project No.: 01-044-631056927 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10 through 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 18, 2002 on our consideration of Lakeshore II, Ltd.'s, internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.
/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
Gadsden, Alabama
February 18, 2002
Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
516 Walnut Street-P.O. Box 775
Gadsden, AL 35902
PHONE: 256-543-3707
FAX: 256-543-9800
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
-----------------------------------
To the Partners
Skyview Apartments, Ltd.
Troy, Alabama
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Skyview Apartments, Ltd., a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-055-631086473 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Skyview Apartments, Ltd., RHS Project No.: 01-055-631086473 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10 through 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 19, 2002 on our consideration of Skyview Apartments, Ltd's., internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.
/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
Gadsden, Alabama
February 19, 2002
Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
516 Walnut Street-P.O. Box 775
Gadsden, AL 35902
PHONE: 256-543-3707
FAX: 256-543-9800
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
--------------------------------
To the Partners
Meadowview Apartments, Ltd.
Greenville, Alabama
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Meadowview Apartments, Ltd., a limited partnership, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statement of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Meadowview Apartments, Ltd., as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 9 and 10 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Donald W. Causey and Associates, P.C.
Certified Public Accountant
Gadsden, Alabama
February 25, 2002
Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
516 Walnut Street-P.O. Box 775
Gadsden, AL 35902
PHONE: 256-543-3707
FAX: 256-543-9800
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
--------------------------------
To the Partners
Applegate Apartments, Ltd.
Florence, Alabama
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Applegate Apartments, Ltd., a limited partnership, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Applegate Apartments, Ltd., as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 9 and 10 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
Gadsden, Alabama
February 28, 2002
Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
516 Walnut Street-P.O. Box 775
Gadsden, AL 35902
PHONE: 256-543-3707
FAX: 256-543-9800
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
-----------------------------------
To the Partners
Heatherwood Apartments, Ltd.
Alexander City, Alabama
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Heatherwood Apartments, Ltd., a limited partnership, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statement of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Heatherwood Apartments, Ltd., as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 9 and 10 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
Gadsden, Alabama
February 12, 2002
Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
2026 Connecticut-P.O. Box 3766
Joplin, MO 64803
PHONE: 417-623-8666
FAX: 417-623-4075
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
---------------------------------
To the Partners
Galena Seniors, L.P.
Joplin, Missouri 64804
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Galena Seniors, L.P. (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Galena Seniors L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued our report dated February 19, 2002 on our consideration of Galena Seniors, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The Supplemental Letter on pages 14-16 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
February 19, 2002
Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
2026 Connecticut-P.O. Box 3766
Joplin, MO 64803
PHONE: 417-623-8666
FAX: 417-623-4075
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
----------------------------------
To the Partners
Purdy Apartments, L.P.
Joplin, Missouri
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Purdy Apartments L.P. (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Purdy Apartments, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued our report dated February 19, 2002 on our consideration of Purdy Apartments, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The Supplemental Letter on pages 14-16 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
February 19, 2002
Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
2026 Connecticut-P.O. Box 3766
Joplin, MO 64803
PHONE: 417-623-8666
FAX: 417-623-4075
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
-------------------------------------
To the Partners
Aurora Seniors, L.P.
Joplin, Missouri 64804
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Aurora Seniors, L.P. (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Aurora Seniors L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued our report dated February 19, 2002 on our consideration of Aurora Seniors, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The Supplemental Letter on pages 14-16 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
February 19, 2002
Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
2025 Connecticut-P.O. Box 3766
Joplin, MO 64803
PHONE: 417-623-8666
FAX: 417-623-4075
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
------------------------------
To the Partners
Baxter Springs Seniors, L.P.
Joplin, Missouri 64804
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Baxter Springs Seniors, L.P. (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Baxter Springs Seniors L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued our report dated February 19, 2002 on our consideration of Baxter Springs Seniors, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The Supplemental Letter on pages 14-16 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
February 19, 2002
Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
2026 Connecticut-P.O. Box 3766
Joplin, MO 64803
PHONE: 417-623-8666
FAX: 417-623-4075
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
---------------------------------
To the Partners
Marionville Seniors, L.P.
Joplin, Missouri 64804
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Marionville Seniors, L.P. (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Marionville Seniors, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued our report dated February 19, 2002 on our consideration of Marionville Seniors, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The Supplemental Letter on pages 14-16 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
February 19, 2002
Suellen Doubet, CPA
603 West Cherokee Street
Wagoner, OK 74467
PHONE: 918-485-8085
FAX: 918-485-3092
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
--------------------------------
To the Partners
of Cavalry Crossing:
I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Cavalry Crossing (a Kansas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001, and 2000 and the related statements of income, partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audit.
I conducted my audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audit provides a reasonable basis for my opinion.
In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cavalry Crossing as of December 31, 2001, and 2000 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
My audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplementary information, The Schedule of Maintenance Expenses has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in my opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, I have also issued a report dated March 15, 2002 on my consideration of Cavalry Crossing's compliance and on internal control over financial reporting. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of my audit.
/s/ Suellen Doubet, CPA
Certified Public Accountant
Wagoner, OK 74467
March 15, 2002
Suellen Doubet, CPA
603 West Cherokee Street
Wagoner, OK 74467
PHONE: 918-485-8085
FAX: 918-485-3092
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
----------------------------
To the Partners
of Sycamore Landing:
I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Sycamore Landing (a Kansas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001, and 2000 and the related statements of income, partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audits.
I conducted my audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audit provides a reasonable basis for my opinion.
In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Sycamore Landing as of December 31, 2001, and 2000 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
My audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplementary information, "The Schedule of Maintenance Expenses" has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in my opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, I have also issued a report dated March 13, 2002 on my consideration of Sycamore Landing's compliance and on internal control over financial reporting. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of my audit.
/s/ Suellen Doubet, CPA
Certified Public Accountant
Wagoner, OK 74467
March 13, 2002
Suellen Doubet, CPA
603 West Cherokee Street
Wagoner, OK 74467
PHONE: 918-485-8085
FAX: 918-485-3092
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
---------------------------------
To the Partners of
Parsons Village:
I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Parsons Village (a Kansas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001, and 2000 and the related statements of operations, partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audits.
I conducted my audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audit provides a reasonable basis for my opinion.
In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Parsons Village as of December 31, 2001, and December 31, 2000 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
My audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplementary information, "The Schedule of Maintenance Expenses" has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in my opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, I have also issued a report dated March 8, 2002 on my consideration of Parsons Village's compliance and on internal control over financial reporting. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of my audit.
/s/ Suellen Doubet, CPA
Certified Public Accountant
Wagoner, OK 74467
March 8, 2002
David G. Pelliccione, C.P.A., P.C.
340 Eisenhower Drive, Suite 220
Savannah, GA 31406
PHONE: 912-354-2334
FAX: 912-354-2443
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
-------------------------------
To The Partners
Brookstone Apartments, L.P.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of BROOKSTONE APARTMENTS, L.P., as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related statement of operations, changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of The Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards of the United States and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. These standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of BROOKSTONE APARTMENTS, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 15, 2002, on our consideration of BROOKSTONE APARTMENTS, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements of BROOKSTONE APARTMENTS, L.P.'s taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 9 through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ David G. Pelliccione, C.P.A., P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
Savannah, Georgia
February 15, 2002
David G. Pelliccione, C.P.A., P.C.
340 Eisenhower Drive, Suite 220
Savannah, GA 31406
PHONE: 912-354-2334
FAX: 912-354-2443
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
--------------------------------
To The Partners
Brooks Hollow Apartments, L.P.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of BROOKS HOLLOW APARTMENTS, L.P., as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related statements of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of The Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards of the United States and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of BROOKS HOLLOW APARTMENTS, L.P., as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 15, 2002, on our consideration of BROOKS HOLLOW APARTMENTS, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements of BROOKS HOLLOW APARTMENTS, L.P., taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 9 through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ David G. Pelliccione, C.P.A., P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
Savannah, Georgia
February 15, 2002
Fentress, Brown, CPAs & Associates, LLC
8001 Ravines Edge Court, Suite 112
Columbus, OH 43235-5421
PHONE: 614-825-0011
FAX: 614-825-0014
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
-------------------------------
To the Partners of Rural Housing Service
Morningside Villa Limited Partnership Servicing Office
DBA Morningside Villa Apartments Findlay, Ohio
Mansfield, Ohio
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Morningside Villa Limited Partnership (a limited partnership), DBA Morningside Villa Apartments, Case No. 41-033-341704593, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, changes in partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration "Audit Program" issued in December 1989. Those standards require that we plan and perform our audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Morningside Villa Limited Partnership, DBA Morningside Villa Apartments, Case No. 41-033-341704593, at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration "Audit Program," issued in December 1989, we have also issued a report dated January 30, 2002, on our consideration of Morningside Villa Limited Partnership's internal control and a report dated January 30, 2002, on its compliance with specific requirements applicable to Rural Housing Service Programs. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.
/s/ Fentress, Brown, CPAs & Associates, LLC
Certified Public Accountants
Columbus, Ohio
January 30, 2002
Fentress, Brown, CPAs & Associates, LLC
8001 Ravines Edge Court, Suite 112
Columbus, OH 43235-5421
PHONE: 614-825-0011
FAX: 614-825-0014
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
------------------------------
To the Partners of Rural Housing Service
Kenton Apartments Company Limited Partnership Servicing Office
DBA Springbrook Commons Findlay, Ohio
Mansfield, Ohio
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Kenton Apartments Company Limited Partnership (a limited partnership), DBA Springbrook Commons, Case No. 41-033-0382999141, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration "Audit Program," issued in December 1989. Those standards require that we plan and perform our audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Kenton Apartments Company Limited Partnership, DBA Springbrook Commons, Case No. 41-033-0382999141, at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration "Audit Program," issued in December 1989, we have also issued a report dated January 30, 2002, on our consideration of Kenton Apartments Company Limited Partnership's internal control and a report dated January 30, 2002, on its compliance with specific requirements applicable to Rural Housing Service Programs. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.
/s/ Fentress, Brown, CPAs & Associates, LLC
Certified Public Accountants
Columbus, Ohio
January 30, 2002
Burrus, Paul & Turnbull, PLC
SunTrust Center, Suite 1230
Norfolk, VA 23510-2276
PHONE: 757-623-3236
FAX: 757-627-8603
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
-----------------------------
To the Partners
Lovingston Ridge
(A Limited Partnership)
Yorktown, Virginia
We have audited the balance sheets of Lovingston Ridge (A Limited Partnership), as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lovingston Ridge (A Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Burrus, Paul & Turnbull PLC
Certified Public Accountants
May 23, 2002
Item 9. Disagreements on Accounting and Financial Disclosures
None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of Gateway
Gateway has no directors or executive officers. Gateway's affairs are managed and controlled by the Managing General Partner. Certain information concerning the directors and officers of the Managing General Partner are set forth below.
Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc. - Managing General Partner
Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc. is the Managing General Partner and is responsible for decisions pertaining to the acquisition and sale of Gateway's interests in the Project Partnerships and other matters related to the business operations of Gateway. The officers and directors of the Managing General Partner are as follows:
Ronald M. Diner, age 58, is President and a Director. He is a Senior Vice President of Raymond James & Associates, Inc., with whom he has been employed since June 1983. Mr. Diner received an MBA degree from Columbia University (1968) and a BS degree from Trinity College (1966). Prior to joining Raymond James & Associates, Inc., he managed the broker-dealer activities of Pittway Real Estate, Inc., a real estate development firm. He was previously a loan officer at Marine Midland Realty Credit Corp., and spent three years with Common, Dann & Co., a New York regional investment firm. He has served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Council for Rural Housing and Development, a national organization of developers, managers and syndicators of properties developed under the RECD Section 515 program, and is a member of the Board of Directors of the Florida Council for Rural Housing and Development. Mr. Diner has been a speaker and panel member at state and national seminars relating to th
e low-income housing credit.
J. Davenport Mosby, age 46, is a Vice President and a Director. He is a Senior Vice President of Raymond James & Associates, Inc. which he joined in 1982. Mr. Mosby received an MBA from the Harvard Business School (1982). He graduated magna cum laude with a BA from Vanderbilt University where he was elected to Phi Beta Kappa.
Sandra L. Furey, age 40, is Secretary, Treasurer. Ms. Furey has been employed by Raymond James & Associates, Inc. since 1980 and currently serves as Closing Administrator for the Gateway Tax Credit Funds.
Raymond James Partners, Inc. -
Raymond James Partners, Inc. has been formed to act as the general partner, with affiliated corporations, in limited partnerships sponsored by Raymond James Financial, Inc. Raymond James Partners, Inc. is a general partner for purposes of assuring that Gateway and other partnerships sponsored by affiliates have sufficient net worth to meet the minimum net worth requirements of state securities administrators.
Information regarding the officers and directors of Raymond James Partners, Inc. is included on page 68 of the Prospectus under the section captioned "Management" (consisting of pages 66 through 69 of the Prospectus) which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Gateway has no directors or officers.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Neither of the General Partners own any units of the outstanding securities of Gateway as of March 31, 2002. Ronald M. Diner, President of Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc. owns 5 units of Series 7. None of the other directors and officers own any units of the outstanding securities of Gateway as of March 31, 2002.
Gateway is a Limited Partnership and therefore does not have voting shares of stock. To the knowledge of Gateway, no person owns of record or beneficially, more than 5% of Gateway's outstanding units.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Gateway has no officers or directors. However, under the terms of the public offering, various kinds of compensation and fees are payable to the General Partners and its affiliates during the organization and operations of Gateway. Additionally, the General Partners will receive distributions from Gateway if there is cash available for distribution or residual proceeds as defined in the Partnership Agreement. The amounts and kinds of compensation and fees are described on pages 24 to 26 of the Prospectus under the caption "Management Compensation", which is incorporated herein by reference.
The Payable to General Partners primarily represents the asset management fees owed to the General Partners at the end of the period. It is unsecured, due on demand and, in accordance with the limited partnership agreement, non-interest bearing. Within the next 12 months, the Managing General Partner does not intend to demand payment on the portion of Asset Management Fees payable classified as long-term on the Balance Sheet.
The Payable to Project Partnerships represents unpaid capital contributions to the Project Partnerships and will be paid after certain performance criteria are met. Such contributions are in turn payable to the general partners of the Project Partnerships.
For the periods ended March 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 the General Partners and affiliates are entitled to compensation and reimbursement for costs and expenses incurred by Gateway as follows:
Asset Management Fee - The Managing General Partner is entitled to receive an annual asset management fee equal to the greater of (i) $2,000 for each limited partnership in which Gateway invests, as adjusted by the Consumer Price Index or (ii) 0.275% of Gateway's gross proceeds from the sale of limited partnership interests. In either event (i) or (ii), the maximum amount may not exceed 0.2% of the aggregate cost (Gateway's capital contribution plus Gateway's share of the Properties' mortgage) of Gateway's interest in properties owned by the Project Partnerships. The asset management fee will be paid only after all other expenses of Gateway have been paid. These fees are included in the Statement of Operations.
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
Series 7 |
$ 87,394 |
$ 87,683 |
$ 87,952 |
Series 8 |
91,032 |
91,364 |
91,655 |
Series 9 |
50,027 |
50,178 |
50,319 |
Series 10 |
34,115 |
34,212 |
34,309 |
Series 11 |
28,770 |
29,087 |
28,465 |
Total |
$ 291,338 |
$ 292,524 |
$ 292,700 |
General and Administrative Expenses - The Managing General Partner is reimbursed for general and administrative expenses of Gateway on an accountable basis. This expense is included in the Statement of Operations.
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
Series 7 |
$ 20,917 |
$ 16,312 |
$ 14,609 |
Series 8 |
23,062 |
17,985 |
16,108 |
Series 9 |
12,872 |
10,038 |
8,991 |
Series 10 |
8,045 |
6,274 |
5,619 |
Series 11 |
6,436 |
5,019 |
4,495 |
Total |
$ 71,332 |
$ 55,628 |
$ 49,822 |
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
a.(1) Financial Statements - see accompanying index to financial statements, Item 8.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules -
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or not required, or because the required information is shown either in the financial statements or in the notes thereto.
(3) Exhibit Index -
Table
Number Page
1.1 Form of Dealer Manager Agreement, including Soliciting Dealer Agreement
1.2
Form of Escrow Agreement between Gateway Tax Credit Fund III Ltd.
and
First Union National Bank
3.1 The form of Partnership Agreement of the Partnership is included as Exhibit "A" to the Prospectus
3.1.1 Certificate of Limited Partnership of Gateway Tax Credit Fund III Ltd.
3.2 Articles of Incorporation of Raymond James Partners, Inc.
3.2.1 Bylaws of Raymond James Partners, Inc.*
3.3 Articles of Incorporation of Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.
3.3.1 Bylaws of Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.
3.4 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Nottingham Apartments, Ltd.
3.5 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Cedar Hollow Apartments Limited Partnership
3.6 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Sunrise I Apartments Limited Partnership
5.1
Legality opinion of Riden, Earle & Kiefner, P.A. is included in
Exhibit
8.1
8.1 Tax opinion and consent of Riden, Earle & Kiefner, P.A.
24.1 The consent of Spence, Marston, Bunch, Morris & Co.
24.1.1 The consent of Spence, Marston, Bunch, Morris & Co. to all references
made
to them in the Registration Statement and the inclusion therein
of the
financial statements of Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.
and Raymond
James Partners, Inc. for the fiscal year ended September
25, 1992
24.1.2 The consent of Spence, Marston, Bunch, Morris & Co. to all references
made
to them in the Registration Statement and the inclusion therein
of the
financial statements of Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.
and Raymond
James Partners, Inc. for the fiscal year ended September
25, 1992 and the
Registrant for the period ended March 31, 1992
24.4
The consent of Riden, Earle, & Kiefner, PA to all references made to
them
in the Prospectus included as a part of the Registration Statement
of
Gateway Tax Credit Fund III Ltd., and all amendments thereto is
included
in their opinions filed as Exhibit 8.1 to the Registration
Statement.
28.1
Table VI (Acquisition of Properties by Program) of Appendix II to
Industry
Guide 5, Preparation of Registration Statements Relating
to Interests in
Real Estate Limited Partnerships
* Included with Form S-11, Registration No. 33-44238 and amendments and
supplements thereto previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
b. Reports filed on Form 8-K - NONE
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 7
Apartment Properties
|
|
|
Mortgage |
Nottingham Cedar Hollow Sunrise Mountain City Burbank Washington BrookStone Tazewell N. Irvine Horton Manchester Waynesboro Lakeland II Mt. Vernon Meadow Run Spring Creek II Warm Springs Blue Ridge Walnut Pioneer Dilley Elsa Clinch View Jamestown Leander Louisa Sr. Orchard Commons Vardaman Heritage Park BrooksHollow Cavalry Crossing Carson City Matteson Pembroke Robynwood Atoka Coalgate Hill Creek Cardinal |
Pisgah, AL Waterloo, NE Mission, SD Mountain City, TN Falls City, NE Bloomfield, NE McCaysville, GA New Tazewell, TN Irvine, KY Horton, KS Manchester, GA Waynesboro, GA Lakeland, GA Mt. Vernon, GA Dawson, GA Quitman, GA Warm Springs, GA Blue Ridge, GA Elk Point, SD Mountain View, AR Dilley, TX Elsa, TX Gate City, VA Jamestown, TN Leander, TX Louisa, KY Crab Orchard, KY Vardaman, MS Paze, AZ Jasper, GA Ft. Scott, KS Carson City, KS Capa, KS Pembroke, KY Cynthiana, KY Atoka, OK Coalgate, OK West Blocton, AL Mountain Home. AR |
18 24 44 40 24 24 40 44 24 24 42 24 30 24 48 24 22 41 24 48 28 40 42 40 36 36 12 24 32 40 40 24 24 16 24 24 24 24 32 |
581,113 758,646 2,019,319 1,311,373 802,656 796,303 1,196,790 1,398,482 788,629 765,680 1,203,818 672,218 831,638 739,853 1,427,138 667,914 673,520 1,093,061 819,593 1,205,116 721,834 1,033,700 1,457,580 1,218,792 912,954 1,191,586 353,219 730,103 1,240,183 1,180,724 1,414,631 787,581 761,775 511,501 779,913 678,345 677,691 775,557 147,660 |
------------ |
|||
$ 36,328,189 |
|||
============ |
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 7 |
Cost At Acquisition |
||
|
|
|
Net Improvements |
Nottingham Cedar Hollow Sunrise Mountain City Burbank Washington BrookStone Tazewell N. Irvine Horton Manchester Waynesboro Lakeland II Mt. Vernon Meadow Run Spring Creek II Warm Springs Blue Ridge Walnut Pioneer Dilley Elsa Clinch View Jamestown Leander Louisa Sr. Orchard Commons Vardaman Heritage Park BrooksHollow Cavalry Crossing Carson City Matteson Pembroke Robynwood Atoka Coalgate Hill Creek Cardinal |
21,070 25,000 30,000 67,000 25,000 30,000 45,000 75,000 27,600 15,615 40,000 45,310 30,000 19,500 20,000 40,000 45,000 0 20,000 30,000 30,000 40,000 99,000 53,800 46,000 90,000 28,789 15,000 199,000 67,155 82,300 86,422 28,438 22,000 35,000 16,000 22,500 29,337 24,207 |
695,113 889,355 837,000 1,345,826 595,780 401,435 176,183 834,811 696,407 641,460 243,179 107,860 149,453 156,335 241,802 117,323 196,691 234,193 112,079 1,092,918 847,755 1,286,910 409,447 436,875 1,063,200 449,409 452,556 93,877 1,243,700 183,029 894,246 354,778 556,314 190,283 315,110 819,334 806,005 622,291 650,852 |
3,279 50,571 1,660,112 192,085 401,058 544,794 1,241,162 793,090 297,024 275,465 1,192,561 664,328 830,194 724,691 1,483,038 651,152 581,636 1,104,950 891,895 228,904 12,508 14,894 1,270,397 1,023,005 5,912 970,578 (1,684) 805,048 139,831 1,190,112 812,905 517,801 357,340 411,021 661,574 0 0 318,382 106,377 |
----------- |
------------ |
------------ |
|
$ 1,666,043 |
$ 21,441,174 |
$22,427,990 |
|
=========== |
============ |
============ |
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 7 |
Gross Amount At Which Carried At December 31, 2001 |
||
|
|
Buildings, |
|
Nottingham Cedar Hollow Sunrise Mountain City Burbank Washington BrookStone Tazewell N. Irvine Horton Manchester Waynesboro Lakeland II Mt. Vernon Meadow Run Spring Creek II Warm Springs Blue Ridge Walnut Pioneer Dilley Elsa Clinch View Jamestown Leander Louisa Sr. Orchard Commons Vardaman Heritage Park BrooksHollow Cavalry Crossing Carson City Matteson Pembroke Robynwood Atoka Coalgate Hill Creek Cardinal |
21,070 28,197 31,702 67,000 37,000 53,933 45,000 75,000 27,600 15,615 49,455 34,500 29,600 19,500 40,000 30,000 20,000 0 62,700 38,614 30,000 40,000 99,000 53,800 133,549 90,000 28,789 15,000 199,000 67,000 94,118 40,028 39,000 22,000 35,000 16,000 22,500 29,337 24,207 |
698,392 936,729 2,495,410 1,537,911 984,838 922,296 1,417,345 1,627,901 993,431 916,925 1,426,285 782,998 980,047 881,026 1,704,840 778,475 803,327 1,339,143 961,274 1,313,208 860,263 1,301,804 1,679,844 1,459,880 981,563 1,419,987 450,872 898,925 1,383,531 1,373,296 1,695,333 918,973 903,092 601,304 976,684 819,334 806,005 940,673 757,229 |
719,462 964,926 2,527,112 1,604,911 1,021,838 976,229 1,462,345 1,702,901 1,021,031 932,540 1,475,740 817,498 1,009,647 900,526 1,744,840 808,475 823,327 1,339,143 1,023,974 1,351,822 890,263 1,341,804 1,778,844 1,513,680 1,115,112 1,509,987 479,661 913,925 1,582,531 1,440,296 1,789,451 959,001 942,092 623,304 1,011,684 835,334 828,505 970,010 781,436 |
----------- |
------------ |
------------ |
|
$1,804,814 |
$43,730,393 |
$45,535,207 |
|
=========== |
============ |
============ |
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 7 |
|
|
Nottingham Cedar Hollow Sunrise Mountain City Burbank Washington BrookStone Tazewell N. Irvine Horton Manchester Waynesboro Lakeland II Mt. Vernon Meadow Run Spring Creek II Warm Springs Blue Ridge Walnut Pioneer Dilley Elsa Clinch View Jamestown Leander Louisa Sr. Orchard Commons Vardaman Heritage Park BrooksHollow Cavalry Crossing Carson City Matteson Pembroke Robynwood Atoka Coalgate Hill Creek Cardinal |
183,056 241,954 813,990 544,767 288,255 322,192 419,816 564,348 238,600 344,454 405,239 231,151 297,576 239,272 495,953 228,463 249,673 419,885 267,040 346,832 163,681 297,192 569,582 500,957 381,001 361,749 122,867 210,946 508,395 394,993 414,879 319,202 323,911 155,015 244,206 301,048 302,469 267,749 132,768 |
5.0-40.0 7.0-40.0 5.0-27.5 7.0-27.5 5.0-30.0 5.0-30.0 5.0-27.5 7.0-27.5 5.0-40.0 5.0-25.0 5.0-25.0 10.0-30.0 10.0-30.0 5.0-30.0 7.0-27.5 10.0-30.0 5.0-40.0 5.0-25.0 5.0-40.0 12.0-40.0 5.0-50.0 7.0-50.0 7.0-27.5 7.0-27.5 7.0-30.0 5.0-40.0 5.0-40.0 5.0-40.0 7.0-27.5 5.0-27.5 12.0-40.0 7.0-27.5 7.0-27.5 5.0-40.0 5.0-40.0 5.0-25.0 5.0-25.0 7.0-27.5 7.0-27.5 |
----------- |
||
$13,115,126 |
||
=========== |
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 8 |
|
|
|
Purdy Galena Antlers 2 Holdenville Wetumka Mariners Cove Mariners Cove Sr. Antlers Bentonville Deerpoint Aurora Baxter Arbor Gate Timber Ridge Concordia Sr. Mountainburg Lincoln Fox Ridge Meadow View Sheridan Morningside Grand Isle Meadowview Taylor Brookwood Pleasant Valley Reelfoot River Rest Kirskville Cimmaron Kenton Lovingston Pontotoc So. Brenchley Hustonville Northpoint Brooks Field Brooks Lane Brooks Point Brooks Run Logan Heights Lakeshore 2 Cottondale |
Purdy, MO Galena, KS Antlers, OK Holdenville, OK Wetumka, OK Marine City, MI Marine City, MI Antlers, OK Bentonville, AR Elgin, AL Aurora, MO Baxter Springs, KS Bridgeport, AL Collinsville, AL Concordia, KS Mountainburg, AR Pierre, SD Russellville, AL Bridgeiport, NE Auburn, NE Kenton, OH Grand Isle, ME Van Buren, AR Taylor, TX Gainesboro, TN Lynchburg, TN Ridgely, TN Newport, TN Kirksville, MO Arco, ID Kenton, OH Lovingston, VA Pontotoc, MS Rexburg, ID Hustonville, KY Jackson, KY Louisville, GA Clayton, GA Dahlonega, GA Jasper, GA Russellville, KY Tuskegee, AL Cottondale, FL |
16 24 24 24 24 32 24 36 24 24 28 16 24 24 24 24 25 24 16 16 32 16 29 44 44 33 20 34 24 24 46 64 36 30 16 24 32 36 41 24 24 36 25 |
459,769 607,728 639,337 725,584 660,048 1,034,830 801,471 1,090,077 573,545 751,563 726,376 428,877 754,876 734,620 683,575 713,447 887,225 742,446 590,861 609,028 972,399 939,354 771,976 1,246,379 1,465,932 1,098,548 655,798 1,145,698 682,306 830,575 1,427,265 2,229,682 1,101,207 1,235,875 523,636 895,947 954,417 1,101,359 1,365,642 757,839 782,890 1,150,540 762,233 |
------------ |
|||
$38,312,780 |
|||
============ |
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 8 |
Cost At Acquisition |
||
|
|
|
Net Improvements |
Purdy Galena Antlers 2 Holdenville Wetumka Mariners Cove Mariners Cove Sr. Antlers Bentonville Deerpoint Aurora Baxter Arbor Gate Timber Ridge Concordia Sr. Mountainburg Lincoln Fox Ridge Meadow View Sheridan Morningside Grand Isle Meadowview Taylor Brookwood Pleasant Valley Reelfoot River Rest Kirskville Cimmaron Kenton Lovingston Pontotoc So. Brenchley Hustonville Northpoint Brooks Field Brooks Lane Brooks Point Brooks Run Logan Heights Lakeshore 2 Cottondale |
64,823 19,200 26,000 15,000 19,977 117,192 72,252 50,529 15,220 33,250 164,350 13,800 43,218 15,145 65,000 20,000 121,000 35,000 29,000 20,100 31,163 20,000 40,000 105,335 28,148 56,269 13,000 50,750 50,000 18,000 61,699 178,985 40,500 99,658 20,000 140,000 45,762 57,500 108,000 50,000 24,600 45,000 36,000 |
493,596 362,505 761,859 877,598 792,876 1,134,974 901,745 1,270,510 743,269 912,974 716,471 418,296 873,748 879,334 776,131 863,990 933,872 867,785 686,959 373,018 1,152,691 1,180,210 954,717 1,185,923 1,780,090 1,288,452 118,127 431,259 188,140 611,963 785,703 2,215,782 312,296 492,781 672,270 942,599 113,295 123,401 135,053 158,025 422,778 273,501 911,975 |
20,739 383,587 0 0 0 27,265 24,161 0 0 (13,750) 23,881 111,767 1,337 3,543 (14,742) 0 61,078 0 8,141 371,339 5,963 0 0 239,510 2,359 11,637 691,960 921,416 593,352 477,199 934,357 334,550 977,678 957,167 4,130 3,430 1,016,361 1,167,062 1,416,126 717,850 504,352 1,098,627 344 |
----------- |
------------ |
------------ |
|
$2,280,425 |
$32,092,541 |
$13,083,776 |
|
=========== |
============ |
============ |
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 8
Gross Amount At Which Carried At December 31, 2001 |
|||
|
|
Buildings, |
|
Purdy Galena Antlers 2 Holdenville Wetumka Mariners Cove Mariners Cove Sr. Antlers Bentonville Deerpoint Aurora Baxter Arbor Gate Timber Ridge Concordia Sr. Mountainburg Lincoln Fox Ridge Meadow View Sheridan Morningside Grand Isle Meadowview Taylor Brookwood Pleasant Valley Reelfoot River Rest Kirskville Cimmaron Kenton Lovingston Pontotoc So. Brenchley Hustonville Northpoint Brooks Field Brooks Lane Brooks Point Brooks Run Logan Heights Lakeshore 2 Cottondale |
65,351 83,432 26,000 15,000 19,977 122,656 87,718 50,529 15,220 19,500 167,145 46,173 43,218 15,145 65,000 20,000 132,188 35,000 29,000 32,300 31,163 20,000 40,000 105,335 28,148 56,269 13,827 52,062 50,000 6,000 61,699 194,772 40,500 99,658 20,000 140,000 45,761 57,500 108,000 50,366 24,600 45,000 36,000 |
513,807 681,860 761,859 877,598 792,876 1,156,775 910,440 1,270,510 743,269 912,974 737,557 497,690 875,085 882,877 761,389 863,990 983,762 867,785 695,100 732,157 1,158,654 1,180,210 954,717 1,425,433 1,782,449 1,300,089 809,260 1,351,363 781,492 1,101,162 1,720,060 2,534,545 1,289,974 1,449,948 676,400 946,029 1,129,657 1,290,463 1,551,179 875,509 927,130 1,372,128 912,319 |
579,158 765,292 787,859 892,598 812,853 1,279,431 998,158 1,321,039 758,489 932,474 904,702 543,863 918,303 898,022 826,389 883,990 1,115,950 902,785 724,100 764,457 1,189,817 1,200,210 994,717 1,530,768 1,810,597 1,356,358 823,087 1,403,425 831,492 1,107,162 1,781,759 2,729,317 1,330,474 1,549,606 696,400 1,086,029 1,175,418 1,347,963 1,659,179 925,875 951,730 1,417,128 948,319 |
----------- |
------------ |
------------ |
|
$2,417,212 |
$45,039,530 |
$47,456,742 |
|
=========== |
============ |
============ |
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 8 |
|
|
Purdy Galena Antlers 2 Holdenville Wetumka Mariners Cove Mariners Cove Sr. Antlers Bentonville Deerpoint Aurora Baxter Arbor Gate Timber Ridge Concordia Sr. Mountainburg Lincoln Fox Ridge Meadow View Sheridan Morningside Grand Isle Meadowview Taylor Brookwood Pleasant Valley Reelfoot River Rest Kirskville Cimmaron Kenton Lovingston Pontotoc So. Brenchley Hustonville Northpoint Brooks Field Brooks Lane Brooks Point Brooks Run Logan Heights Lakeshore 2 Cottondale |
232,672 275,714 280,371 308,984 281,129 408,293 316,130 444,775 287,978 187,666 324,293 186,569 203,800 208,597 264,000 303,405 313,330 170,246 217,515 180,382 314,304 416,353 324,604 238,620 562,141 420,519 240,115 402,209 249,904 331,409 431,614 826,722 242,277 452,431 152,167 220,194 298,412 343,747 398,067 239,654 217,119 253,044 235,948 |
7.0-27.5 7.0-27.5 5.0-25.0 5.0-25.0 5.0-25.0 7.0-27.5 7.0-27.5 10.0-25.0 5.0-25.0 5.0-50.0 7.0-27.5 7.0-27.5 5.0-40.0 5.0-40.0 5.0-25.0 5.0-25.0 7.0-27.5 5.0-50.0 5.0-30.0 5.0-50.0 5.0-33.0 7.0-27.5 5.0-25.0 5.0-50.0 5.0-50.0 5.0-50.0 7.0-27.5 7.0-50.0 5.0-27.5 7.0-27.5 5.0-33.0 7.0-27.5 5.0-40.0 7.0-27.5 5.0-40.0 5.0-40.0 5.0-40.0 5.0-40.0 5.0-40.0 5.0-40.0 7.0-40.0 5.0-40.0 5.0-27.5 |
----------- |
||
$13,207,423 |
||
=========== |
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 9 |
|
|
|
Jay Boxwood Stilwell 3 Arbor Trace Arbor Trace 2 Omega Cornell 2 Elm Creek Marionville Lamar Mt. Glen Centreville Skyview Sycamore Bradford Cedar Lane Stanton Abernathy Pembroke Meadowview Town Branch Fox Run Maple Sreet Manchester |
Jay, OK Lexington, TX Stilwell, OK Lake Park, GA Lake Park, GA Omega, GA Watertown, SD Pierre, SD Marionville, MO Lamar, AR Heppner, OR Centreville, AL Troy, AL Coffeyville, KS Cumberland, KY London, KY Stanton, KY Abernathy, TX Pembroke, KY Greenville, AL Mt. Vernon, KY Ragland, AL Emporium, PA Manchester, GA |
24 24 16 24 42 36 24 24 20 24 24 24 36 40 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 32 18 |
651,808 620,875 467,225 741,048 1,457,440 1,133,166 922,448 954,222 564,491 715,380 826,888 788,629 1,133,769 1,414,234 790,963 737,492 802,546 625,235 797,822 652,718 773,002 776,985 1,363,607 590,386 |
------------ |
|||
$20,302,379 |
|||
============ |
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 9 |
Cost At Acquisition |
||
|
|
|
Net Improvements |
Jay Boxwood Stilwell 3 Arbor Trace Arbor Trace 2 Omega Cornell 2 Elm Creek Marionville Lamar Mt. Glen Centreville Skyview Sycamore Bradford Cedar Lane Stanton Abernathy Pembroke Meadowview Town Branch Fox Run Maple Sreet Manchester |
30,000 22,273 15,567 62,500 100,000 35,000 29,155 71,360 24,900 18,000 23,500 36,000 120,000 64,408 66,000 49,750 41,584 30,000 43,000 46,270 21,000 47,467 85,000 24,100 |
103,524 718,529 82,347 185,273 361,210 188,863 576,296 233,390 409,497 202,240 480,064 220,952 220,161 415,748 285,025 952,314 959,574 751,898 955,687 1,086,351 942,114 919,296 1,178,856 711,035 |
677,073 30,137 489,218 670,585 1,345,224 1,183,441 565,626 886,467 276,475 684,085 560,407 718,081 1,072,191 1,329,564 704,607 458 0 0 7,608 4,292 21,296 8,868 439,808 2,700 |
----------- |
------------ |
------------ |
|
$1,106,834 |
$13,140,244 |
$11,678,211 |
|
=========== |
============ |
============ |
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 9 |
Gross Amount At Which Carried At December 31, 2001 |
||
|
|
Buildings, |
|
Jay Boxwood Stilwell 3 Arbor Trace Arbor Trace 2 Omega Cornell 2 Elm Creek Marionville Lamar Mt. Glen Centreville Skyview Sycamore Bradford Cedar Lane Stanton Abernathy Pembroke Meadowview Town Branch Fox Run Maple Sreet Manchester |
25,000 22,273 10,000 62,500 100,000 35,000 86,281 130,189 92,914 18,000 23,500 36,000 120,000 72,681 66,000 49,750 41,584 30,000 43,000 46,270 21,000 47,467 85,000 27,200 |
785,597 748,666 577,132 855,858 1,706,434 1,372,304 1,084,796 1,061,028 617,958 886,325 1,040,471 939,033 1,292,352 1,737,039 989,632 952,772 959,574 751,898 963,295 1,090,643 963,410 928,164 1,618,664 710,635 |
810,597 770,939 587,132 918,358 1,806,434 1,407,304 1,171,077 1,191,217 710,872 904,325 1,063,971 975,033 1,412,352 1,809,720 1,055,632 1,002,522 1,001,158 781,898 1,006,295 1,136,913 984,410 975,631 1,703,664 737,835 |
----------- |
------------ |
------------ |
|
$1,291,609 |
$24,633,680 |
$25,925,289 |
|
=========== |
============ |
============ |
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
SCHEDULE III -REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 9 |
|
|
Jay Boxwood Stilwell 3 Arbor Trace Arbor Trace 2 Omega Cornell 2 Elm Creek Marionville Lamar Mt. Glen Centreville Skyview Sycamore Bradford Cedar Lane Stanton Abernathy Pembroke Meadowview Town Branch Fox Run Maple Sreet Manchester |
256,518 261,507 189,816 205,717 409,743 347,238 368,690 377,611 243,472 296,371 331,408 293,664 243,216 343,760 224,748 231,964 235,080 255,031 219,024 197,266 202,479 250,323 324,390 180,717 |
5.0-25.0 5.0-25.0 5.0-25.0 10.0-30.0 10.0-30.0 5.0-50.0 5.0-30.0 5.0-27.5 7.0-27.5 5.0-25.0 7.0-27.5 5.0-40.0 5.0-40.0 12.0-40.0 5.0-40.0 5.0-40.0 5.0-40.0 5.0-25.0 7.0-40.0 5.0-40.0 7.0-40.0 7.0-27.5 7.0-40.0 5.0-27.5 |
----------- |
||
$6,489,753 |
||
=========== |
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 10 |
|
|
|
|||
Redstone Albany Oak Terrace Wellshill Applegate Heatherwood Peachtree Donna Wellsville Tecumseh Clay City Irvine West New Castle Stigler Courtyard |
Challis, ID Albany, KY Bonifay, FL West Liberty, KY Florence, AL Alexander City, AL Gaffney, SC Donna, TX Wellsville, NY Tecumseh, NE Clay City, KY Irvine, KY New Castle, KY Stigler, OK Huron, SD |
24 24 18 32 36 36 28 50 24 24 24 24 24 20 21 |
845,073 778,131 543,053 1,081,425 1,114,105 898,692 1,002,547 1,424,967 1,058,035 866,358 811,871 808,950 805,309 592,891 644,354 |
|||
------------ |
||||||
$13,275,761 |
||||||
============ |
||||||
Cost At Acquisition |
||||||
|
|
|
Net Improvements |
|||
Redstone Albany Oak Terrace Wellshill Applegate Heatherwood Peachtree Donna Wellsville Tecumseh Clay City Irvine West New Castle Stigler Courtyard |
24,000 39,500 27,200 75,000 125,000 55,000 25,000 112,000 38,000 20,000 22,750 25,000 40,575 24,000 12,000 |
747,591 990,162 633,284 1,270,844 1,467,675 1,551,679 1,021,466 1,661,889 1,286,389 1,038,151 998,334 1,060,585 971,520 730,056 465,936 |
360,473 12,867 5,104 5,100 245,962 5,077 27,046 6,187 25,648 28,745 3,292 3,961 10,216 0 291,733 |
|||
------- |
------------ |
------------ |
||||
$665,025 |
$15,895,561 |
$1,031,411 |
||||
======== |
============ |
============ |
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 10 |
Gross Amount At Which Carried At December 31, 2001 |
||||
|
|
Buildings, |
|
||
Redstone Albany Oak Terrace Wellshill Applegate Heatherwood Peachtree Donna Wellsville Tecumseh Clay City Irvine West New Castle Stigler Courtyard |
7,600 39,500 27,200 75,000 125,000 55,000 25,000 112,000 38,000 20,000 22,750 25,000 40,575 24,000 71,331 |
1,124,464 1,003,029 638,388 1,275,944 1,713,637 1,556,756 1,048,512 1,668,076 1,312,037 1,066,896 1,001,626 1,064,546 981,736 730,056 698,338 |
1,132,064 1,042,529 665,588 1,350,944 1,838,637 1,611,756 1,073,512 1,780,076 1,350,037 1,086,896 1,024,376 1,089,546 1,022,311 754,056 769,669 |
||
----------- |
------------ |
------------ |
|||
$707,956 |
$16,884,041 |
$17,591,997 |
|||
=========== |
============ |
============ |
|||
- ----------- |
Accumulated |
Depreciable |
|||
Redstone Albany Oak Terrace Wellshill Applegate Heatherwood Peachtree Donna Wellsville Tecumseh Clay City Irvine West New Castle Stigler Courtyard |
353,338 241,165 180,209 284,085 308,595 287,737 202,852 265,288 412,203 213,649 203,393 219,829 198,988 153,119 186,145 |
7.0-27.5 5.0-40.0 5.0-27.5 5.0-40.0 5.0-40.0 5.0-40.0 5.0-40.0 7.0-50.0 7.0-27.5 5.0-50.0 5.0-40.0 5.0-40.0 5.0-40.0 5.0-25.0 5.0-40.0 |
|||
----------- |
|||||
$3,710,595 |
|||||
=========== |
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 11 |
|
|
|
Homestead Mountain Oak Eloy Gila Bend Creekstone Tifton Cass Towne Warsaw Royston Red Bud Cardinal Parsons |
Pinetop, AZ Collinsville, AL Eloy, AZ Gila Bend, AZ Dallas, GA Tifton, GA Cartersville, GA Warsaw, VA Royston, GA Mokane, MO Mountain Home, AR Parsons, KS |
32 24 24 36 40 36 10 56 25 8 32 38 |
1,312,776 684,916 646,193 970,747 902,021 904,480 110,417 2,660,396 741,787 238,716 96,334 1,091,630 |
------------ |
|||
$10,360,413 |
|||
============ |
Cost At Acquisition |
|||
|
|
|
Net Improvements |
Homestead Mountain Oak Eloy Gila Bend Creekstone Tifton Cass Towne Warsaw Royston Red Bud Cardinal Parsons |
126,000 30,000 12,000 18,000 130,625 17,600 22,690 146,800 36,000 5,500 15,793 45,188 |
1,628,502 473,033 882,913 945,233 170,655 192,853 301,458 3,200,738 785,602 295,617 424,616 953,512 |
36,376 376,391 42,312 350,819 1,707,324 1,496,433 3,226 (11,075) 114,304 0 69,400 347,237 |
----------- |
------------ |
------------ |
|
$606,196 |
$10,254,732 |
$4,532,747 |
|
=========== |
============ |
============ |
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 11 |
Gross Amount At Which Carried At December 31, 2001 |
||||
|
|
Buildings, |
|
||
Homestead Mountain Oak Eloy Gila Bend Creekstone Tifton Cass Towne Warsaw Royston Red Bud Cardinal Parsons |
126,000 30,000 12,000 18,000 130,650 17,327 22,690 146,800 36,000 5,500 15,793 38,437 |
1,664,878 849,424 925,225 1,296,052 1,877,954 1,689,559 304,684 3,189,663 899,906 295,617 494,017 1,307,499 |
1,790,878 879,424 937,225 1,314,052 2,008,604 1,706,886 327,374 3,336,463 935,906 301,117 509,809 1,345,937 |
||
----------- |
------------ |
------------ |
|||
$599,197 |
$14,794,478 |
$15,393,675 |
|||
=========== |
============ |
============ |
|||
|
Accumulated |
Depreciable |
|||
Homestead Mountain Oak Eloy Gila Bend Creekstone Tifton Cass Towne Warsaw Royston Red Bud Cardinal Parsons |
334,949 235,545 254,946 359,241 423,959 260,516 57,600 771,987 206,603 48,344 86,618 215,183 |
5.0-40.0 5.0-27.5 5.0-27.5 5.0-40.0 7.0-27.5 5.0-25.0 7.0-27.5 7.0-27.5 7.0-40.0 7.0-40.0 7.0-27.5 12.0-40.0 |
|||
----------- |
|||||
$3,255,491 |
|||||
=========== |
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
NOTES TO SCHEDULE III
SERIES 7 |
|
|
Balance at end of period - |
|
|
Reconciliation of Accumulated |
|
|
Balance at end of period - |
|
SCHEDULE III -REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
NOTES TO SCHEDULE III
Series 8 |
|
|
Balance at end of period - |
|
|
Reconciliation of Accumulated |
|
|
Balance at end of period - |
|
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
NOTES TO SCHEDULE III
Series 9 |
|
|
Balance at end of period - |
|
|
Reconciliation of Accumulated |
|
|
Balance at end of period - |
|
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
NOTES TO SCHEDULE III
Series 10 |
|
|
Balance at end of period - |
|
|
Reconciliation of Accumulated |
|
|
Balance at end of period - |
|
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
NOTES TO SCHEDULE III
Series 11 |
|
|
Balance at end of period - |
|
|
Reconciliation of Accumulated |
|
|
Balance at end of period - |
|
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
SCHEDULE IV - MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 7 |
|
|
|
MONTHLY |
|
Nottingham Cedar Hollow Sunrise Mountain City Burbank Washington BrookStone Tazewell N. Irvine Horton Manchester Waynesboro Lakeland II Mt. Vernon Meadow Run Spring Creek II Warm Springs Blue Ridge Walnut Pioneer Dilley Elsa Clinch View Jamestown Leander Louisa Sr. Orchard Commons Vardaman Heritage Park BrooksHollow Cavalry Crossing Carson City Matteson Pembroke Robynwood Atoka Coalgate Hill Creek Cardinal |
18 24 44 40 24 24 40 44 24 24 42 24 30 24 48 24 22 41 24 48 28 40 42 40 36 36 12 24 32 40 40 24 24 16 24 24 24 24 32 |
581,113 758,646 2,019,319 1,311,373 802,656 796,303 1,196,790 1,398,482 788,629 765,680 1,203,818 672,218 831,638 739,853 1,427,138 667,914 673,520 1,093,061 819,593 1,205,116 721,834 1,033,700 1,457,580 1,218,792 912,954 1,191,586 353,219 730,103 1,240,183 1,180,724 1,414,631 787,581 761,775 511,501 779,913 678,345 677,691 775,557 147,660 ---------- |
7.75% 7.75% 7.25% 7.75% 8.25% 8.25% 6.50% 7.25% 7.75% 7.75% 6.50% 6.50% 7.25% 6.50% 6.50% 6.50% 7.25% 7.25% 7.75% 8.25% 8.25% 7.75% 8.75% 7.25% 7.75% 7.25% 7.75% 7.25% 7.75% 6.50% 7.75% 7.25% 7.25% 7.25% 7.25% 7.25% 7.25% 6.50% 6.50% |
4,041 5,115 12,842 8,853 5,725 5,674 6,970 8,916 5,311 5,160 6,991 3,899 5,290 4,294 8,284 3,835 4,276 2,372 5,528 8,516 5,143 6,976 11,046 7,770 6,755 7,622 2,676 4,634 8,360 6,854 9,545 5,005 4,845 3,296 5,078 4,392 4,384 4,491 948 |
50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 |
$36,328,189 =========== |
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
SCHEDULE IV - MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 8 |
|
|
|
MONTHLY |
|
Purdy Galena Antlers 2 Holdenville Wetumka Mariners Cove Mariners Cove Sr. Antlers Bentonville Deerpoint Aurora Baxter Arbor Gate Timber Ridge Concordia Sr. Mountainburg Lincoln Fox Ridge Meadow View Sheridan Morningside Grand Isle Meadowview Taylor Brookwood Pleasant Valley Reelfoot River Rest Kirskville Cimmaron Kenton Lovingston Pontotoc So. Brenchley Hustonville Northpoint Brooks Field Brooks Lane Brooks Point Brooks Run Logan Heights Lakeshore 2 Cottondale |
16 24 24 24 24 32 24 36 24 24 28 16 24 24 24 24 25 24 16 16 32 16 29 44 44 33 20 34 24 24 46 64 36 30 16 24 32 36 41 24 24 36 25 |
459,769 607,728 639,337 725,584 660,048 1,034,830 801,471 1,090,077 573,545 751,563 726,376 428,877 754,876 734,620 683,575 713,447 887,225 742,446 590,861 609,028 972,399 939,354 771,976 1,246,379 1,465,932 1,098,548 655,798 1,145,698 682,306 830,575 1,427,265 2,229,682 1,101,207 1,235,875 523,636 895,947 954,417 1,101,359 1,365,642 757,839 782,890 1,150,540 762,233 ---------- |
7.75% 7.25% 7.25% 6.50% 6.50% 7.25% 7.25% 7.25% 7.75% 7.75% 7.25% 6.50% 6.50% 7.25% 6.50% 6.50% 8.25% 7.25% 7.25% 8.25% 7.25% 8.25% 7.25% 7.50% 6.50% 7.25% 7.25% 7.25% 7.25% 10.75% 7.25% 7.00% 7.25% 7.25% 6.50% 7.25% 7.25% 7.25% 7.25% 7.25% 7.25% 7.75% 7.75% |
5,242 6,410 4,174 4,267 3,911 6,572 5,105 6,938 4,835 5,250 7,652 4,086 4,380 4,679 3,963 4,162 6,330 4,732 3,757 3,527 6,177 6,703 5,243 7,223 8,499 6,978 4,234 7,256 4,320 4,905 9,045 12,917 6,927 7,728 3,062 5,700 6,046 6,954 8,613 4,786 4,960 7,716 5,115 |
50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 45 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 39 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 |
$38,312,780 =========== |
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
SCHEDULE IV - MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 9
|
|
|
|
MONTHLY |
|
Jay Boxwood Stilwell 3 Arbor Trace Arbor Trace 2 Omega Cornell 2 Elm Creek Marionville Lamar Mt. Glen Centreville Skyview Sycamore Bradford Cedar Lane Stanton Abernathy Pembroke Meadowview Town Branch Fox Run Maple Street Manchester |
24 24 16 24 42 36 24 24 20 24 24 24 36 40 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 32 18 |
651,808 620,875 467,225 741,048 1,457,440 1,133,166 922,448 954,222 564,491 715,380 826,888 788,629 1,133,769 1,414,234 790,963 737,492 802,546 625,235 797,822 652,718 773,002 776,985 1,363,607 590,386 ---------- |
7.25% 6.50% 7.25% 7.25% 7.25% 7.25% 7.25% 7.25% 6.50% 7.25% 6.50% 7.25% 7.25% 7.25% 7.03% 6.50% 7.25% 6.50% 7.25% 0.50% 7.25% 6.50% 7.25% 7.25% |
4,167 3,666 3,038 4,700 9,235 7,193 5,862 6,060 5,308 4,593 4,797 4,998 7,199 8,979 5,008 4,383 5,120 3,673 5,070 3,006 4,973 4,510 8,632 3,740 |
50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 20 50 50 50 50 |
$20,302,379 =========== |
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
SCHEDULE IV - MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 10 |
|
|
|
MONTHLY |
|
Redstone Albany Oak Terrace Wellshill Applegate Heatherwood Peachtree Donna Wellsville Tecumseh Clay City Irvine West New Castle Stigler Courtyard |
24 24 18 32 36 36 28 50 24 24 24 24 24 20 21 |
845,073 778,131 543,053 1,081,425 1,114,105 898,692 1,002,547 1,424,967 1,058,035 866,358 811,871 808,950 805,309 592,891 644,354 ---------- |
6.50% 6.50% 6.50% 7.25% 0.50% 0.50% 7.25% 6.50% 6.50% 7.25% 7.25% 7.25% 7.25% 7.25% 6.50% |
4,905 4,570 3,150 6,843 4,937 4,301 6,379 8,252 6,316 5,481 5,158 5,137 5,131 3,764 3,729 |
50 50 50 50 20 20 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 |
$13,275,761 =========== |
SERIES 11 |
|
|
|
MONTHLY |
|
Homestead Mountain Oak Eloy Gila Bend Creekstone Tifton Cass Towne Warsaw Royston Red Bud Cardinal Parsons |
32 24 24 36 40 36 10 56 25 8 32 38 |
1,312,776 684,916 646,193 970,747 902,021 904,480 110,417 2,660,396 741,787 238,716 96,334 1,091,630 ---------- |
6.50% 8.00% 6.00% 8.00% 11.00% 0.00% 3.00% 6.50% 6.75% 7.25% 6.50% 8.00% |
7,411 2,745 3,460 6,428 5,235 2,077 1,417 15,387 4,414 1,458 1,348 6,243 |
50 50 50 50 30 42 10 50 50 50 50 50 |
$10,360,413 =========== |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
By: Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.
Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.
Date: July 9, 2002 By:/s/ Ronald M. Diner
Ronald M. Diner
President
Date: July 9, 2002 By:/s/ Sandra L. Furey
Sandra L. Furey
Secretary and Treasurer
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND III LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
By: Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.
Managing General Partner
Date: July 9, 2002 By:/s/ Ronald M. Diner
Ronald M. Diner
President
Date: July 9, 2002 By:/s/ Sandra L. Furey
Sandra L. Furey
Secretary and Treasurer