Back to GetFilings.com





UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
----------------------
FORM 10-K

(Mark One)
[ ] Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934
OR
[X] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from
February 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004.

Commission File Number 0-10593

CANDIE'S, INC.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


Delaware 11-2481903
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)


215 West 40th Street, New York, New York 10018
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 730-0030

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

Name of Each Exchange
Title of Each Class on which Registered
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
None Not Applicable

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock, $.001 par value
Preferred Share Purchase Rights
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes _X_ No __

Indicate by check if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)
Yes__ No. X
---

The aggregate market value of the registrant's Common Stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant as of the close of business on July 31, 2004
(the last day of the second fiscal quarter), was approximately $66,170,000.

As of March 23, 2005, 28,416,482 shares of the Registrant's Common Stock, par
value $.001 per share were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: None.






CANDIE'S, INC.-FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS



Page


PART I

Item 1. Business....................................................................................... 2
Item 2. Properties..................................................................................... 9
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.............................................................................. 9
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders............................................ 10

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.......................... 11
Item 6. Selected Financial Data........................................................................ 11
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.......... 12
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk...................................... 19
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.................................................... 19
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure........... 19
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures........................................................................ 19
Item 9B. Other Information.............................................................................. 19



PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant............................................. 19
Item 11. Executive Compensation......................................................................... 22
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management................................. 24
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions................................................. 26
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services......................................................... 27

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules .................................................... 28

Signatures................................................................................................... 29

Consolidated Financial Statements............................................................................ F-1









PART I
Item 1...Business

Introduction

Candie's, Inc. (the "Company"), which was incorporated in Delaware in
1978, is in the business of licensing and marketing intellectual property. The
Company currently owns three brands, CANDIE'S(R), BONGO(R) and BADGLEY
MISCHKA(R), which it licenses to third parties for use in connection with a
variety of apparel, footwear, and fashion products. The Company also arranges
through its wholly-owned subsidiary Bright Star Footwear, Inc. ("Bright Star")
for the manufacture of footwear products for mass market and discount retailers
under the private label brand of the retailer.

The Company's business strategy, as a licensing and marketing company,
is to maximize the value of its intellectual property by entering into strategic
licenses with partners who have been selected based upon the Company's belief
that they will be able to produce and sell quality products in the categories of
their specific expertise. This licensing strategy is designed to permit the
Company to operate its licensing business with minimal working capital, no
inventory, production or distribution costs or risks, and utilizing only a small
group of core employees.

On December 7, 2004, the Company announced that beginning January 1,
2005, it had changed its fiscal year ending on January 31, to a calendar year
beginning on January 1st and ending on December 31st. The change was designed to
align the Company's financial reporting with that of its licensees. As a result,
the current period will be reported as an 11- month period ending on December
31, 2004 ("11-month Current Year").

Historical Background and Operations

In March 1993, the Company purchased ownership of the CANDIE'S
trademark from New Retail Concepts, Inc. ("NRC"), together with certain
pre-existing licenses of NRC. Thereafter, the Company commenced designing,
manufacturing, selling and marketing CANDIE'S footwear and building the CANDIE'S
brand into one of the most well-recognized junior footwear brands in the United
States. On or about 1995, the Company also commenced designing, manufacturing,
selling and marketing footwear under the BONGO name pursuant to an agreement
with Michael Caruso & Co., Inc. ("Caruso"). The Company also operated Bright
Star, which engaged in the manufacture of footwear products for mass market and
discount retailers under the private label brand of the retailer or other
trademarks owned or licensed by the Company.

As part of its efforts to expand its operations and build CANDIE'S
and BONGO into lifestyle brands, in 1998, the Company entered into licenses for
CANDIE'S fragrance, socks and eyewear and acquired all of the outstanding shares
of Caruso. See "New Business Model: Trademarks and Licensing".

In 1998, the Company also formed Unzipped Apparel, LLC ("Unzipped"),
with its then joint venture partner Sweet Sportswear LLC ("Sweet"), for the
purpose of marketing and distributing apparel and jeans wear under the BONGO
label. The Company and Sweet each had a 50% interest in Unzipped. Pursuant to
the terms of the joint venture, the Company licensed the BONGO trademark to
Unzipped for use in the design, manufacture and sale of jeans wear and certain
apparel products for a term ending March 31, 2003, and Sweet was responsible for
the operations of the BONGO jeans wear business.

On April 23, 2002, the Company acquired the remaining 50% interest in
Unzipped from Sweet and entered into a variety of agreements with Sweet and
certain of its affiliated entities relating to the operations of Unzipped. See
Notes 2 and 8 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Item 13 -
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions. On or about August 5, 2004, the
Company terminated all its contractual relations with Sweet and its affiliated
entities and commenced litigation against them and Mr. Hubert Guez, an
individual who controlled these entities. See Item 3-Legal Proceedings.

Commencing with the acquisition of Unzipped and until the time that the
operations of the Company were licensed to third parties, the Company's
operations were comprised of two reportable segments: footwear and apparel. The
footwear segment included CANDIE'S footwear, BONGO footwear, private label
footwear, Bright Star, retail store operations and licensing. The apparel
segment included BONGO jeans wear. See Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for certain segment information regarding the Company.



2





A description of the revenues attributable to the Company's primary
products for the periods referred to below and a description of those products
are as follows:

11-Months Fiscal Year
Ended December 31, Ended January 31,
Product 2004 2004 2003
(in thousands)
-------------------------------------------------------
CANDIE'S Footwear $ - $ 30,755 $ 68,438
BONGO Footwear - 8,204 13,327
BRIGHT STAR 21,910 21,139 14,009
Licensing 8,571 6,574 5,140
-------------------------------------------------------
Footwear Segment 30,481 66,672 100,914

BONGO Jeanswear
(Apparel Segment) 38,499 64,705 55,869
-------------------------------------------------------
$ 68,980 $131,377 $156,783
=======================================================

Transition to Licensing and Marketing Model

In May 2003, the Company completed the first of a series of strategic
transactions designed to transform the Company from an entity with operating
footwear and jeans wear divisions, to an entity whose primary business is to
generate revenue through the licensing and marketing of its intellectual
property to third parties.

The first step in the transition was to license the Company's footwear
operations, which was accomplished in or about May 2003, when the Company
entered into two licenses. The first license was entered into on May 1, 2003,
with Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. ("KCP"), pursuant to which the Company
granted KCP the exclusive right to design, manufacture, distribute and sell
women's and kids footwear bearing the BONGO mark (the "Bongo Footwear License").
See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The second license was
entered into on May 12, 2003 with Steven Madden Ltd ("Steve Madden"), wherein
the Company granted Steve Madden the exclusive right to design, manufacture,
distribute and sell women's and kids' footwear bearing the CANDIE'S trademark
(the Candie's Footwear License", together with the Bongo Footwear License, the
"Footwear Licenses").

As a result of the Bongo Footwear License, KCP immediately took over
the shipping of Fall 2003 BONGO inventory and the Company ceased all
manufacturing and shipping of BONGO footwear, thereby effectively eliminating
the Company's operations as they related to the production and distribution of
BONGO women's and girl's footwear. With respect to CANDIE'S footwear products,
the Company continued to purchase, ship, sell, warehouse and collect receivables
for CANDIE'S footwear through the end of the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004
("Fiscal 2004"). Steven Madden commenced shipping footwear under the license in
the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2004. The Company has subsequently amended the
Candie's Footwear License with Steven Madden in conjunction with a
multi-category license of the CANDIE'S brand, including footwear, to Kohl's
Department Stores, Inc. ("Kohl's"). See New Business Model - Trademarks and
Licensing.

As a result of the granting of the Footwear Licenses and the
elimination of its footwear operations, by the end of Fiscal 2004, the Company
closed all of its retail stores on a staggered basis and substantially reduced
its workforce. In October 2003, the Company closed its office in Valhalla, New
York, and consolidated its offices into a single floor in the New York City
office.
The second significant step in the Company's transition to a licensing
and marketing company was the licensing of its jeans wear operations, which it
accomplished in June 2004 when the Company entered into a license agreement that
became effective on August 1, 2004, granting the right to design, manufacture,
distribute and sell BONGO jeans wear to TKO Apparel, Inc., ("TKO") (the "Jeans
Wear License"). In connection with the Jeans Wear License, the designees of TKO
purchased one million shares of the Company's common stock at a price of $2.20
per share, and agreed to purchase any remaining assets of Unzipped on or about
January 31, 2005, however, there have been no resulting asset purchases of
Unzipped as of January 31, 2005. The Company also entered into a note payable to
TKO in the amount of $2.5 million. On September 21, 2004, the Company engaged
TKO to manage the Unzipped BONGO jeans wear business through October 31, 2004
for a fee that was to be the greater of $750,000 or a formula based upon the
sales price received by Unzipped for certain inventory of Unzipped. On November
11, 2004, TKO assigned all its rights in connection with the Jeans Wear License
and other corresponding agreements to its affiliate, Bongo Apparel, Inc.
("BAI").

On August 5, 2004, the Company terminated its relationship with the
manager of Unzipped, Sweet, along with its supplier, Azteca Production
International, Inc. ("Azteca"), and distributor, Apparel Distribution Services,


3


LLC ("ADS") . See Item 3-"Legal Proceedings". The Company thereafter entered
into agreement with BAI for it to manage the liquidation of Unzipped. BAI took
over operations and began to ship BONGO jeans under a management agreement with
Unzipped in the Fall of 2004. BAI started shipping BONGO jeanswear under the
Jeanswear License in November 2004.

The third strategic step in the transition to a licensing company was
to diversify the Company's ownership of brands beyond the junior segment on
which CANDIE'S and BONGO were focused. In furtherance of this objective, on
October 29, 2004, the Company acquired the principal assets of B.E.M.
Enterprise, Ltd. ("BEM"), the holding company for the luxury designer business
"Badgley Mischka" from parent company Escada U.S.A. The purchase price for the
transaction was $950,000, funded by the issuance of 214,981 shares of the
Company's common stock. The agreement provides that in the event the value of
the 214,981 shares issued is less than $950,000 as of April 27, 2005, the
difference will be funded by the issuance of additional shares based on the
shares valued on April 27, 2005 (the "Adjustment Provision"). On November 17,
2004, in connection with the acquisition, the Company filed a registration
statement with the SEC for the 214,981 shares of the Company's common stock
issued to BEM and the additional 100,000 shares of common stock which represents
the Company's good faith estimate of the maximum amount of additional shares of
its common stock that may it may be required to issue to BEM pursuant to the
Adjustment Provision.

In addition to licensing and marketing the CANDIE'S, BONGO and BADGLEY
MISHCKA brands, the Company continues to operate Bright Star. Acting principally
as agent for its customers, Bright Star designs, places for manufacture and
distributes a wide variety of men's branded and unbranded work boots, hiking
boots, winter boots and leisure footwear. Bright Star's customer base includes
discount and specialty retailers. Bright Star's products are generally directed
toward the mid-priced and discount markets. The retail prices of Bright Star's
footwear generally range from $25 to $70. The substantial majority of Bright
Star revenues were from private label sales. Through Bright Star, the Company
sells its products to Wal-Mart and other mass merchandisers. In the 11-month
Current Year, Bright Star's sales of private label product to Wal-Mart accounted
for $19.1 million or 27.7% of the Company's net revenue, as opposed to Fiscal
2004 in which such sales accounted for $20.9 million or 15.9% of the Company's
net revenue. In the fiscal year ended January 31, 2003 ("Fiscal 2003"), Bright
Star's sales to Wal-Mart accounted for $10.1 million in revenue or 6.4% of the
Company's net revenue.

New Business Model: Trademarks and Licensing

The Company's core business under the new model is licensing and
marketing the CANDIE'S, BONGO and BADGLEY MISCHKA brands with respect to a
variety of apparel, footwear, accessories and fashion products. The CANDIE'S and
BONGO trademarks are owned by its subsidiary, IP Holdings LLC ("IPH"), and the
BADGLEY MISCHKA trademark is owned by its subsidiary Badgley Mischka Licensing
LLC ("BML"). See "Ownership Structure for the Trademarks".

The longest held trademark, and the one with the most history relevant
to the Company with respect to its former footwear operations is CANDIE'S.
CANDIE'S is a young women's brand with 25 years of heritage. CANDIE'S is known
for its sexy image, value prices and affiliations with celebrity spokespeople.

In May 2003, the Company, through IPH, licensed its CANDIE'S
footwear operations exclusively to Steven Madden. See Transition to Licensing
Model. The Candie's Footwear License had a term of 6 1/2 years and required
Steve Madden to pay to IPH guaranteed royalties based upon guaranteed minimum
net sales. The license also required Steve Madden to pay guaranteed advertising
royalties to IPH. The license also contains strict provisions for the licensor
to preview and approve product, packaging and any presentation of the CANDIE'S
brand.

On December 6, 2004, a license agreement (the "Kohl's License ") was
entered into by and among the Company, IPH, and Kohl's. Pursuant to the Kohl's
License, the Company granted Kohl's the exclusive right to design, manufacture,
sell and distribute a broad range of products under the CANDIE'S trademark,
including women's, juniors' and children's apparel, accessories (except
optical), beauty and personal care products, home accessories and electronics.
Kohl's was also granted the non-exclusive right to sell footwear and handbags
bearing the CANDIE'S brand through December 31, 2006, which rights become
exclusive to Kohl's on January 1, 2007. The initial term of the Kohl's License
expires on January 29, 2011, subject to Kohl's option to renew the Kohl's
License for up to three additional terms of five years each contingent on Kohl's
meeting certain performance and minimum sale standards. The agreement also
contains certain minimum royalties that Kohl's is obligated to pay to the
Company, which average between $8 million and $9 million per contract year (the
first contract year ending on December 31, 2006). Kohl's is also obligated to
pay to the Company an advertising royalty each contract year, which the Company
must spend on national advertising supporting the CANDIE'S brand.

In connection with the Kohl's License, the Company amended the
Candies Footwear License with Steve Madden, to provide Kohl's with the exclusive
rights to footwear commencing January 1, 2007. In connection with the amendment,
the Company is forgoing certain minimum royalties from Steve Madden, and has
agreed to make certain payments to Steve Madden in the event that Kohl's fails
to purchase certain amounts of footwear from Steve Madden through January 2011.

In connection with the Kohl's License, the Company also amended its
existing exclusive handbag license agreement with LaRue Distributors, Inc
("LaRue"), which originally had a term ending December 31, 2007. Pursuant to the
amendment, Kohl's will have the exclusive right to sell and market handbags
bearing the CANDIE'S brand commencing January 1, 2007. In connection with the
amendment, the Company is forgoing certain guaranteed minimums royalties from La
Rue, and has agreed to make certain payments to LaRue in the event that Kohl's
fails to purchase certain amounts of handbags from LaRue through December 31,
2010.

4


The only other product categories for which Kohl's does not have
exclusive rights to the CANDIE'S brand beside footwear and handbags, as
described above, are fragrance and optical. With respect to fragrance, the
Company has an existing license agreement with Liz Claiborne, Inc. for fragrance
and related products which ends on December 31, 2005, after which the rights to
fragrance will be granted exclusively to Kohl's. With respect to optical, the
Company has an exclusive agreement with Viva Optique, Inc. for use on optical
frames only that expires on January 31, 2008, after which the rights to optical
revert to the Company.

The other trademark that is owned by IPH is BONGO, a core denim brand
that is targeted to represent the spirit and attitude of the California
lifestyle. After purchasing the BONGO trademark in 1998, the Company formed
Unzipped and licensed the right to use the BONGO trademark on jeans wear to
Unzipped. From 1998 through August 1994, Sweet operated the BONGO jeans wear
business through Unzipped. On June 9, 2004, IPH and the Company licensed the
BONGO trademark for jeans wear to BAI pursuant to the Jeans Wear License. During
the 11-months ended December 31, 2004, Unzipped sold its jeans wear products to
a variety of retail accounts in the United States consisting of mid-tier
department stores, including May Co., Sears, JC Penney, and Goody's. During the
11-months ended December 31, 2004 JC Penney accounted for more than 10% of the
Company's net revenues relating to Bongo jeans wear and in Fiscal 2004, no
customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company's net revenues.

In addition to the license to BAI for women's and men's jeans wear,
the BONGO brand is licensed in 14 other categories including kids' apparel,
footwear, outerwear, tops, handbags, eyewear and various other fashion products
and accessories. There is also an international agreement for the distribution
of a variety of BONGO products in Central and South America.

The Company acquired BADGLEY MISCHKA on October 29, 2004. BADGLEY
MISCHKA is a couture brand of evening wear designed by Mark Badgley and James
Mischka. The products are distributed through luxury department and specialty
stores including Bergdorf Goodman, Neiman Marcus and Saks Fifth Avenue.

BML has entered into a number of licenses for the BADGLEY MISCHKA
brand, including in the categories of couture and better apparel, eyewear,
bridal gowns and fur. The most significant of these licenses, the couture and
dress license, is with Group JS International ("Group JS"). The license was
entered into on March 22, 2005, and contains minimum sales and royalty
guarantees. In connection with the license with Group JS, the Company agreed to
delay the payment of the first $500,000 of royalties by Group JS to BML until
April 2007, with the initial term expiring on December 31, 2008, subject to the
right of Group JS to renew the license for up to two additional terms of three
years each contingent on meeting certain performance and minimum sales
standards.

Ownership Structure for the Trademarks

The CANDIE'S and BONGO trademarks are owned by IPH. The Company formed
IPH in August 2002, for the purpose of issuing in connection with a private
placement, $20 million of asset-backed notes secured by the Company's CANDIE'S
and BONGO trademarks, trade names and license payments thereon. In connection
with this transaction, the Company assigned its CANDIE'S and BONGO trademarks to
IPH. See Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

As a result of the assignment, IPH owns federal registrations or has
pending federal registrations in the United States Patent and Trademark Office
for CANDIE'S and BONGO in both block letter and logo formats, as well as a
variety of ancillary marks for use on footwear, apparel, fragrance, handbags,
watches and various other goods and services. In addition, from time to time,
IPH registers certain of its trademarks in other countries and regions including
Canada, Europe, South and Central America and Asia. In connection with the
formation of and assignment of its intellectual property to IPH, the Company
also assigned all of its license agreements for the CANDIE'S and BONGO
trademarks to IPH. The Company, as manager of IPH's licensing program, has
pursued and intends to pursue licensing opportunities for the CANDIE'S and BONGO
trademarks as an important means for reaching the targeted consumer base,
increasing brand awareness in the marketplace and generating additional income.
Potential licensees are subject to a selective process performed by the
Company's management, including, among other factors, the strength of the
licensee, both creatively and financially, the existence of guaranteed
royalties, the negotiation of approval over all products and other terms
protecting the Company's intellectual property customary in trademark licensing
agreements.

The BADGLEY MISCHKA brand is owned by BML. BML owns federal
registrations or has pending federal registrations in the United States Patent
and Trademark Office for BADGLEY MISCHKA in both block letter and logo formats,
as well as registrations in other countries and regions including Canada,
Europe, South and Central America and Asia.

It is the Company's intention through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, to
continue to enter into licensing agreements with additional parties if it and
its subsidiaries believe that the prospective licensee has the requisite quality
standards, understanding of the brand, distribution capabilities, experience in
a respective business and financial stability, and that the proposed product can
be successfully marketed. All the licenses will contain provisions for IPH or
BML to preview and approve product, packaging and any presentation of the brand,
which provisions IPH believes are critical to maintaining the strength and
integrity of its brands. The licenses will also contain such terms as to minimum
sales, minimum royalties, rights to audit, and such other terms as the Company
will be able to negotiate on behalf of IPH and BML.

5


Employees

As of March 23, 2005, the Company had a total of 27 employees, 16 in
the licensing and corporate area, five at Bright Star and six in the Badgley
Mischka division. Of these 27 employees, five of the Company's employees are
executives, five are designers and the remainder are middle management,
marketing, and administrative personnel. None of the Company's employees are
represented by a labor union. The Company considers its relations with its
employees to be satisfactory.

Prior to granting the Footwear Licenses, the Company had approximately
200 employees at the corporate and retail level. The majority of these positions
were eliminated with the transition out of footwear and retail operations.

Advertising, Marketing and Website

The Company believes that advertising to promote and enhance its brands
is an important part of its long-term growth strategy as a licensing and
marketing company. A majority of the licenses pursuant to which the Company has
licensed the right to use CANDIE'S and BONGO require the Company to advertise
the respective brands in exchange for the payment of an advertising royalty. The
Company is also planning a BADGLEY MISCHKA campaign to support the brand.

The Company believes that its innovative advertising campaigns
featuring celebrities and performers, which have brought it national
recognition, have resulted in increased sales and consumer awareness of its
branded products. Over the past few years, the Company has had successful
marketing partnerships for CANDIE'S with superstars in the music industry such
as Destiny's Child, Ashanti, the Dixie Chicks, Brandy, Vanessa Carlton, L'il
Kim, Lisa Loeb, Shania Twain and Mark McGrath, and television stars such as
Jenny McCarthy, Kelly Clarkson, Alyssa Milano and Kelly Osbourne. The Company
has pursued a similar approach with respect to its BONGO campaigns. Recording
artists such as Mya, and actresses Liv Tyler, Nicole Richie, Rachel Bilson and
Amy Smart have all represented the Company's brands in marketing campaigns that
emphasize the hip, sexy image of the clothing, footwear and accessories.

The luxury brand BADGLEY MISCHKA is known for its luxurious gowns,
which have been worn by many of Hollywood's most glamorous stars including Kate
Winslet, Catherine Zeta Jones, Angelina Jolie and Halle Berry, and by Jenna and
Barbara Bush, twin daughters of President George Bush. The Company is still
developing its advertising strategy for BADGLEY MISCHKA but anticipates a
combination of campaigns featuring celebrities and other approaches.

The Company's advertising has appeared in fashion magazines such as
Cosmopolitan, InStyle and Glamour, and teenage lifestyle magazines such as Teen
People and Seventeen, as well as in television commercials, newspapers, on
outdoor billboards and on the Internet. In addition, the Company has used
sweepstakes and radio promotions, often with personal appearances by
celebrities, to generate excitement with its consumers.

The Company maintains websites for its brands, currently
www.candies.com and www.bongo.com. The Company also maintains a corporate
website that provides financial and background information about the Company
located at www.candiesinc.com. Information contained in these websites is not a
part of this report.

Tariffs, Import Duties and Quotas

All apparel products sold in the United States through the Company's
licensees that are manufactured overseas are also subject to United States
tariffs, customs and quotas with respect to Vietnam. While operating the jeans
wear business, Unzipped paid import duties ranging from 5-18%. The Company and
its licensees are unable to predict whether, or in what form, quotas or other
restrictions on the importation of its footwear and apparel products may be
imposed in the future. Any imposition of quotas or other import restrictions
could have a material adverse effect on the Company. In addition, other
restrictions on the importation of footwear and apparel are periodically
considered by the United States Congress and no assurance can be given that
tariffs or duties on the Company's and its licensees' goods may not be raised,
resulting in higher costs to the Company, or that import quotas respecting such
goods may not be changed, which could restrict or delay shipment of products
from the Company's existing foreign suppliers.

Risk Factors

The Company operates in a changing environment that involves numerous
known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affect
its operations. The following highlights some of the factors that have affected,
and in the future could affect, the Company's operations.

The Company has incurred losses during recent fiscal years and future losses
could negatively affect the Company's cash flows and business operations.

Although the Company recorded net income of $241,000 in the 11-month
Current Year it sustained net losses of $11.3 million and $3.9 million in Fiscal
2004 and Fiscal 2003, respectively. The Company cannot guarantee that it will
not incur losses in the future.

The Company is no longer engaged in the design, manufacture, distribution or
sale of branded apparel, footwear or other fashion products and, consequently,
the Company's revenues are dependent on the success of certain licensees of
those rights.



6


Although the Company's licensing agreements for its brands usually
require the advance payment to the Company of certain fees and provide for
certain guaranteed minimum royalty payments to the Company, the failure by the
licensees to satisfy their obligations under the agreements may result in the
termination of the license agreements. Moreover, during the terms of the license
agreements, the Company will be substantially dependent upon the abilities of
the licensees to maintain the quality, marketability and consumer recognition of
the licensed footwear products bearing the Company's brands. In addition,
failure by the licensees to meet their production, manufacturing or distribution
requirements could negatively impact their sales and resulting royalty payments
to the Company which, in turn would materially adversely affect the Company's
revenues and business operations. Moreover, the failure by licensees to meet
their financial obligations to the Company could jeopardize the Company's
ability to meet the financial covenants in connection with the Company's
asset-backed notes issued by a subsidiary of the Company which would give the
note holders the right to foreclose on the CANDIE'S and BONGO intellectual
properties, which are the security for the debt.

The Company's business is dependent on continued market acceptance of the
products that are being produced and sold by the Company's licensees and of the
CANDIE'S, BONGO and BADGLEY MISCHKA trademarks.

The Company's ability to achieve continued market acceptance of its
existing products, products of the Company's licensees utilizing the Company's
trademarks as well as market acceptance of any future products that may be
offered to the market bearing the Company's trademarks is subject to a high
degree of uncertainty. The Company's ability to achieve market acceptance by new
customers or continued market acceptance by existing or past customers will
require substantial additional marketing efforts and the expenditure of
significant funds by the Company to create a demand for such products. The
Company's additional marketing efforts and expenditures may not result in either
increased market acceptance of the Company's products or products of the
Company's licensees or increased sales of such products. The Company is
materially dependent on the sale of products bearing its trademarks, including
products designed, produced, and distributed by the Company's licensees for a
significant portion of the Company's revenues. Although the Company's licensees
guarantee minimum net sales and minimum guaranteed royalties to the Company, a
failure of the Company's trademarks or products to achieve or maintain market
acceptance could reduce the Company's sales and licensing revenues, thereby
negatively impacting cash flows.

A substantial portion of the Company's licensing revenues are concentrated in
one retailer.

Two of the Company's key licenses are largely dependent on Kohl's, the
CANDIE'S License, which grants the exclusive license to Kohl's of the CANDIE'S
trademark for all categories of products, except optical, at December 31, 2006,
and the Jeans Wear License, as Kohl's is one of the largest customers of BONGO
jeanswear. Because the business of the Company's is largely concentrated in
Kohl's, if Kohl's had financial difficulties or ceased to operate it would
negatively impact the Company's revenue.

The Company, which had a working capital deficit at December 31, 2004, has
incurred a substantial amount of indebtedness and to the extent that cash flow
from the Company's continuing operations is insufficient to meet the Company's
debt obligations, the Company may be required to seek additional financing to
satisfy the Company's obligations.

The Company has approximately $18.9 million principal and interest
outstanding on seven-year asset backed notes issued by the Company's subsidiary,
IPH, in August 2002. In addition, in connection with the Company's acquisition
in April 2002 from Sweet of the joint venture formed with Sweet, the Company
issued to Sweet $11.0 million principal amount of senior subordinated notes that
will mature in 2012. At December 31, 2004 the amount of the Note, had been
reduced to $3.0 million. Moreover, the Company had a working capital deficit of
approximately $7.2 million at December 31, 2004. While the Company believes that
it will generate sufficient revenues from its licensing operation to satisfy its
obligations for the foreseeable future, in the event that projected cash flow
proves to be insufficient to satisfy the Company's cash requirements including
the Company's debt obligations, the Company may be required to seek additional
funds through, among other means, public or private equity or debt financing,
which financing, if obtained, may result in dilution to the Company's
stockholders. The Company's failure to obtain any required additional financing
on terms acceptable to it, or at all, could result in the acceleration of the
payment obligations of certain of the Company's indebtedness that could
materially adversely affect the Company's business operations and financial
position.

A recession in the fashion industry or rapidly changing fashion trends could
harm the Company's operating results.

The fashion industry is cyclical, with purchases of apparel and related
goods tending to decline during recessionary periods when disposable income is
low. A poor general economic climate could have a negative impact on the
licensees' ability to compete for limited consumer resources. Moreover, the
Company's future success depends in substantial part on the licensees' and the
Company's ability to anticipate and respond to changing consumer demands and
fashion trends in a timely manner. The footwear and wearing apparel industries
are generally subject to constantly changing fashion trends. If the Company or
the Company's licensees misjudge the market for a particular product or product
line, it may result in an increased inventory of unsold and outdated finished
goods, which could increase the affected licensees' operating costs without a
corresponding increase in revenues.

The Company's licensees are subject to risks and uncertainties of foreign
manufacturing that could interrupt operations or increase operating cost thereby
impacting their ability to deliver goods to the market.

Substantially all of the products sold by the Company's licensees are
manufactured overseas. The Company and its licensees are subject to various
risks inherent in foreign manufacturing, including fluctuations in foreign
currency exchange rates; shipping delays; and international political,
regulatory, and economic developments, all of which can have a significant
impact on the licensee's operating costs and consequently, the Company's
earnings.

7


The Company's licensees also import certain finished products and
assume all risk of loss and damage once their suppliers ship these goods. If
these goods are destroyed or damaged during shipment it could impact the
Company's revenues as a result of its licensees' delay in delivering finished
products to customers.

Because of the intense competition in the apparel and fashion industries and the
strength of some of the Company's or its licensees' competitors, the Company may
not be able to continue to compete successfully.

The apparel, footwear, and fashion industries are extremely competitive
in the United States and the Company's licensees face intense and substantial
competition for the Company's product lines. In general, competitive factors
include quality, price, style, name recognition and service. In addition, the
presence in the marketplace of various fads and the limited availability of
shelf space can affect competition. Many of the Company's licensees' competitors
have greater financial, distribution, marketing and other resources than they
have and have achieved significant name recognition for their brand names. The
Company may not be able to continue to compete successfully in the market with
respect to the licensing arrangements the Company's licensees may be unable to
successfully compete in the markets for such products.

The Company may not be able to protect its proprietary rights or avoid claims
that the Company infringes on the proprietary rights of others.

The Company owns federal trademark registrations for CANDIE'S, BONGO
and BADGLEY MISCHKA, among others, and believes that the Company's trademarks
have significant value and are important to the marketing of the Company's
products. To the extent that the trademarks owned or used by the Company and its
licensees are deemed to violate the proprietary rights of others, or in the
event that these trademarks would not be upheld if challenged, the Company
would, in either such event, be prevented from using the trademarks, which could
have an adverse effect on the Company. In addition, the Company may not have the
financial resources necessary to enforce or defend trademarks owned or used by
the Company.

The Company is dependent upon its key executives and other personnel, whose loss
would adversely impact the Company's business.

The Company's success of is largely dependent upon the efforts of Neil
Cole, the Company's President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman and certain
key executives. Although the Company has entered into an employment agreement
with Mr. Cole, expiring in December 31, 2007, the loss of his and/or his key
executives' services would have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business and prospects. The Company's success is also dependent upon the
Company's ability to hire and retain additional qualified sales and marketing
personnel in connection with the design, marketing and distribution of the
Company's products as well as the Company's ability to hire and retain
administrative personnel. The Company may not be able to hire or retain such
necessary personnel.

Provisions in the Company's charter and share purchase rights plan may prevent
an acquisition of Candie's.

Certain provisions of the Company's Certificate of Incorporation and
the Company's Share Purchase Rights Plan could have the effect, either alone or
in combination with each other, of making more difficult, or discouraging an
acquisition of the Company's company deemed undesirable by the Company's Board
of Directors. The Company's Certificate of Incorporation provides for the
issuance of up to 75,000,000 shares of common stock and 5,000,000 shares of
preferred stock. As of April 20, 2004 there were approximately 26,000,000 shares
of the Company's common stock and no shares of preferred stock outstanding.
Additional shares of the Company's common stock and preferred stock are
therefore available for future issuance without stockholder approval. The Share
Purchase Rights Plan, commonly known as a "poison pill," states that, in the
event than an individual or entity acquires 15% of the outstanding shares of the
Company stockholders other than the acquirer may purchase additional shares of
the Company's common stock for a fixed price. The existence of authorized but
un-issued capital stock, together with the existence of the Share Purchase
Rights Plan, could have the effect of discouraging an acquisition of the
Company.

The Company is subject to certain litigation that could impact its future
financial results.

The Company is currently a plaintiff and cross-defendant in a
litigation pending in California state court involving Unzipped and a defendant
in a litigation pending in federal district court in New York involving a former
supplier. The Company's financial condition could be adversely impacted if it is
required to pay the monetary damages sought by the cross-complainants in the
California action and the plaintiff in the New York action, or if it is
adjudicated that the contractual rights concerning Unzipped that the Company
relied upon in preparing its financial statements are invalid. See Item 3-Legal
Proceedings.

The market price of the Company's common stock may be volatile.

The market price of the Company's common stock may be highly volatile.
Disclosures of the Company's operating results, announcements of various events
by the Company or the Company's competitors and the development and marketing of
new products affecting the Company's industry may cause the market price of the
Company's common stock to change significantly over short periods of time.

8


Future sales of shares of the Company's common stock could affect the
market price of the Company's common stock and the Company's ability to raise
additional capital. The Company has previously issued a substantial number of
shares of common stock, which are eligible for resale under Rule 144 of the
Securities Act or under prospectus, and may become freely tradable. The Company
has also registered a substantial number of shares of common stock that are
issuable upon the exercise of options and warrants. If holders of options or
warrants choose to exercise their purchase rights and sell shares of common
stock in the public market, or if holders of currently restricted shares choose
to sell such shares in the public market under Rule 144 or otherwise, the
prevailing market price for the common stock may decline. Future public sales of
shares of common stock may adversely affect the market price of the Company's
common stock or the Company's future ability to raise capital by offering equity
securities.


Item 2. Properties

The Company currently occupies approximately 5,000 square feet of
office space on the 6th floor at 215 West 40th Street, New York, New York,
10018, pursuant to a lease that expires on June 30, 2005. The Company
anticipates moving to a new location that has not yet been determined once the
lease, and any extension that the Company might be able to negotiate, expires.
The current lease for the 6th floor has an annual rental of $125,000.

During the 11-Month Period, the Company also paid rent on the BADGLEY
MISCHKA retail store in Beverly Hills, CA in the amount of $46,000. There is a
lease currently in effect that expires on December 31, 2006, for monthly rent of
$23,000.


Item 3. Legal Proceedings

On August 5, 2004, the Company, along with Unzipped, its subsidiary
Michael Caruso & Co., Inc.("Caruso") and IPH (collectively, "Plaintiffs")
commenced a lawsuit in the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County,
against Unzipped's former manager, former supplier and former distributor,
Sweet, Azteca and ADS, and a principal of these entities and former Company
Board member, Hubert Guez (collectively, "Defendants"). Plaintiffs amended their
Complaint on November 22, 2004. In their Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs allege
that Defendants' fraudulently induced Plaintiffs to purchase Sweet's 50%
interest in Unzipped for an inflated price, Sweet and Azteca committed material
breaches of the management, supply and distribution agreements and Guez
materially breached his fiduciary obligations to the Company while a member of
the Company's Board of Directors, and seeks damages in excess of $50 million.
Additionally, Plaintiffs allege that Defendants have imported, distributed and
sold goods bearing the Company's BONGO trademarks in violation of federal and
California law. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss certain of the claims
asserted in the Amended Complaint, and on February 7, 2005, the Court denied
Defendants' motion in its entirety. Defendants filed an Answer to Plaintiffs'
Amended Complaint on March 10, 2005.

On August 31, 2004, the Superior Court granted Plaintiffs' request for
preliminary injunctive relief, and ordered Defendants to make available to
Plaintiffs approximately 657,000 pairs of BONGO(R) jeans in Defendants'
possession or control upon Plaintiffs making a $75,600 cash payment into the
Court's escrow account and posting a $1.7 million bond with the Court.
Plaintiffs filed the required monies with the Court, and Defendants released the
BONGO(R) jeans encompassed by the Court's injunction. On November 29, 2004, the
Superior Court ruled that Defendants were permitted to sell approximately
141,000 pairs of BONGO(R) jeans in Defendants' possession.

On March 10, 2005, Sweet, Azteca and ADS filed a Cross-Complaint
(collectively, "Cross-Complainants") against Plaintiffs and the Company's Chief
Executive Officer, Neil Cole ("Mr. Cole") seeking compensatory, punitive and
exemplary damages and litigation costs, as well as the establishment of a
constructive trust for the benefit of the Cross-Complainants. The
Cross-Complainants allege that some or all of the Plaintiffs breached the
management, supply and distribution agreements, IPH and Mr. Cole interfered with
Sweet's performance under the management agreement, and the Company, Caruso and
Mr. Cole interfered with Cross-Complainants' relationships with Unzipped and
caused Unzipped to breach its agreements with Azteca and ADS. Cross-Complainants
allege that some or all of the Company, Caruso and Mr. Cole fraudulently induced
Sweet to sell its 50% interest in Unzipped for a deflated price and enter into
an associated 8% Senior Subordinated Note (the "Note").

The Company had previously entered into a management agreement
wherein Sweet guarantees that the net income of Unzipped, as defined, shall be
no less than $1.7 million for each year during the term ("the Guarantee"). In
the event that the Guarantee is not met, Sweet is obligated to pay the
difference between the actual net income, as defined and the Guarantee ("the
Shortfall Payment").

Additionally, Cross-Complainants allege that the Company has breached
its obligations to Sweet arising under the Note by, among other things,
understating Unzipped's earnings for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004 and
the first three quarters of the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005 for the
purpose of causing Unzipped to fall short of the Guarantee for these periods,
and improperly offsetting the Shortfall Payment against the Note. See Note 2 to
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Cross-Complainants allege that
the understatements in Unzipped's earnings and offsets against the Note were
incorporated into the Company's public filings for the periods identified above,
causing the Company to overstate materially its earnings and understate its
liabilities for such period with the effect of improperly inflating the public
trading price of the Company's common stock.. Plaintiffs and Mr. Cole deny
Cross-Complainants' allegations and intend to vigorously defend against the
Cross-Complaint.

In January 2002, Redwood Shoe Corporation ("Redwood"), one of the
Company's former buying agents of footwear filed a complaint in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that the
Company breached various contractual obligations to Redwood and seeking to


9


recover damages in excess of $20 million and its litigation costs. The Company
filed a motion to dismiss certain counts of the complaint based upon Redwood's
failure to state a claim, in response to which Redwood has filed an amended
complaint. The Company also moved to dismiss certain parts of the amended
complaint. The magistrate assigned to the matter granted, in part, the Company's
motion to dismiss, and this ruling is currently pending before the District
Court. The Company intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit, and file
counterclaims against Redwood after the District Court rules on the pending
motion to dismiss. At December 31, 2004 and January 31, 2004, the payable to
Redwood totaled approximately $1.8 million which is subject to any claims,
offsets or other deductions the Company may assert against Redwood.

In April 2003, the Company settled the Securities and Exchange
Commission's ("SEC") investigation of the Company regarding matters that had
been under investigation by the SEC since July 1999. In connection with the
settlement, the Company, without admitting or denying the SEC's allegations,
consented to the entry by the SEC of an administrative order in which the
Company was ordered to cease and desist from committing or causing any
violations and any future violations of certain books and records, internal
controls, periodic reporting and the anti-fraud provisions of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the anti-fraud provisions of the Securities Act of
1933.

In November 2001, the Company settled a litigation filed in December
2000 in the United States District Court for Southern District of New York, by
Michael Caruso, as trustee of the Claudio Trust and Gene Montasano
(collectively, "Caruso"). The settlement agreement between the Company and
Caruso provided for the Company to pay to Caruso equal quarterly payments of
$62,500, up to a maximum amount of $1 million, over a period of four years.
However, the Company's obligation to make these quarterly payments terminated on
or about November 15, 2004 based upon a provision of the settlement agreement
that stated that in the event that the last daily sale price per share of the
Company's common stock reached at least $4.98 during any ten days within a
thirty day period, the Company's obligation to make the quarterly payments would
terminate. The remaining balance of $238,000 was recognized as a reduction of
special charges in the fourth quarter of the 11-month Current Year.

From time to time, the Company is also made a party to certain
litigation incurred in the normal course of business. While any litigation has
an element of uncertainty, the Company believes that the final outcome of any of
these routine matters will not have a material effect on the Company's financial
position or future liquidity. Except as set forth herein, the Company knows of
no material legal proceedings, pending or threatened, or judgments entered,
against any director or officer of the Company in his capacity as such.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.





10




PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

The Company's Common Stock has traded on NASDAQ since January 22, 1990
(under the symbol "CAND"). The following table sets forth, for the indicated
periods, the high and low sales prices for the Company's Common Stock as
reported by NASDAQ:

High Low
Eleven Months Ended December 31, 2004
Fourth Quarter ................... $6.34 $4.20
Third Quarter .................. 4.95 2.46
Second Quarter..................... 3.04 2.15
First Quarter .................. 2.88 2.00

Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2004
Fourth Quarter ................... $2.49 $1.69
Third Quarter .................. 2.69 1.35
Second Quarter..................... 2.27 0.89
First Quarter .................. 1.28 0.55

As of March 23, 2005 there were approximately 2,700 holders of record
of the Company's Common Stock.

The Company has not paid cash dividends on its common stock since its
inception. The Company anticipates that for the foreseeable future, earnings, if
any, will be retained for use in the business or for other corporate purposes,
and it is not anticipated that any cash dividends will be paid by the Company in
the foreseeable future.

See Item 12 - "Securities Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management-Equity Compensation Plans" for certain information concerning
securities issued under the Company's equity compensation plans.


Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Selected Historical Financial Data
(in thousands, except earnings per share amounts)

The following table presents selected historical financial data of the
Company for the periods indicated. The selected historical financial information
is derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company
referred to under item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and previously
published historical financial statements not included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction
with Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the Company's consolidated financial statements,
including the notes thereto, included elsewhere herein.



11-Months Fiscal Year
Ended December 31, Ended January 31,
---------------------------------------------------------
2004 2004 2003 2002 2001
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Operating Data *:
Net revenue $68,980 $131,377 $156,783 $101,402 $95,194
Operating income (loss) 2,736(1) (8,164)(1) (961)(1) (1,545)(1) (7,174)(1)
Net income (loss) 241 (11,340) (3,945) (2,282) (8,200)

Earnings (Loss) per share:
Basic $0.01 $(0.45) $(0.17) $(0.12) $(0.43)
Diluted 0.01 (0.45) (0.17) (0.12) (0.43)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic 26,851 25,181 23,681 19,647 19,231
Diluted 28,706 25,181 23,681 19,647 19,231


11



At December 31, At January 31,
---------------------------------------------------------
2004 2004 2003 2002 2001
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance Sheet Data *:

Current assets $9,627 $25,655 $51,816 $22,730 $23,772
Total assets 60,160 74,845 103,437 50,670 50,370
Long-term debt, long-term portion 19,367 25,020 28,505 638 1,153
Total stockholders' equity 24,258 18,868 29,011 23,519 24,745



* As of May 1, 2002, the operating results of Unzipped, the Company's
Bongo jeanswear business, have been consolidated. Thus, operating
results in the 11-month Current Year, Fiscal 2003 and Fiscal 2004 are
not comparable to prior years. Additionally, in May 2003, the Company
changed its business model by licensing its Candie's and Bongo
footwear. See Item 1 -Business Transition of Footwear Operations. As a
result, its 11 - month Current Year and for Fiscal 2004 results are not
comparable with prior years.

(1) Includes special charges of $295 in the 11-month Current Year, $4,629
in Fiscal 2004, $3,566 in Fiscal 2003, and $1,791 in Fiscal 2002, and
$2,674 in Fiscal 2001. See Notes 4 and 8 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. The statements that are not historical facts contained in Item 7
and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forward looking statements
that involve a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
factors, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict and many of which
are beyond the control of the Company, which may cause the actual results,
performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any
future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward
looking statements.

Such factors include, but are not limited to, uncertainty regarding
continued market acceptance of current products and the ability to successfully
develop and market new products particularly in light of rapidly changing
fashion trends, the impact of supply and manufacturing constraints or
difficulties relating to the Company's licensees' dependence on foreign
manufacturers and suppliers, uncertainties relating to customer plans and
commitments, the ability of licensees to successfully market and sell branded
products, competition, uncertainties relating to economic conditions in the
markets in which the Company operates, the ability to hire and retain key
personnel, the ability to obtain capital if required, the risks of litigation
and regulatory proceedings, the risks of uncertainty of trademark protection,
the uncertainty of marketing and licensing acquired trademarks and other risks
detailed in this report and in the Company's other SEC filings, and uncertainty
associated with the impact on the Company in relation to recent events discussed
above in this report.

The words "believe", "expect", "anticipate", "seek" and similar
expressions identify forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to
place undue reliance on these forward looking statements, which speak only as of
the date the statement was made.

General Introduction

In December, 2004, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a
change in the Company's fiscal year end from January 31 to December 31,
effective for the period ending December 31, 2004. As a result, the 11-month
Current Year has been reported as an eleven month period. The 12-month period
from February 1, 2003 through January 31, 2004 was the Company's Fiscal 2004.

In May 2003, the Company changed its business model by licensing its
footwear operations pursuant to the footwear licenses and in June 2004 it
entered into the Jeans Wear License, effective August 1, 2004, thereby,
respectively, transitioning the Company's operations as they related to the
production and distribution of women's and girl's footwear and jeans wear. In
December 2004, the Company, through IPH, entered into the Kohl's License. As a
result of this change in the footwear operations of the Company, the Company is
now a marketing and licensing company that focuses on licensing and marketing
its brands. See Item 1-New Business Model - Trademarks and Licensing. The
Company also markets and sells, principally as an agent, a variety of men's
outdoor boots and casual shoes under private label brands through Bright Star.

On October 29, 2004 (the "Closing Date"), the Company acquired the
principal assets (the "Purchased Assets") of BEM, the holding company for the
designer business "Badgley Mischka" from parent company Escada U.S.A. The
purchased assets include the Badgley Mischka trademark, two existing licenses
and the rights to operate the existing Badgley Mischka retail store located on
Rodeo Drive in Beverly Hills, California. The purchase price for the transaction
was $950,000, (excluding $372,000 of fees and expenses related to the
acquisition) which was paid by the Company's issuance of 214,981 shares of the
Company's common stock. The purchase price of the Purchased Assets is subject to
an upward adjustment in the event that the closing sale price of the Company's
common stock on the date which is 180 days after the Closing Date is less than
the closing sale price on the Closing Date. Any such adjustment will also be
paid in shares of the Company's common stock. The Company filed a registration
statement with the SEC for the resale of the 214,981 shares of the Company's
common stock issued to BEM. The registration statement was declared effective by
the SEC on December 1, 2004.

As a result of the Company's transition to a licensing business, and
to a lesser extent, its change in fiscal year end, the Company's operating
results are not comparable to prior years. Further, since there are no net sales
attributable to women's wholesale and retail footwear activities in the 11-month
Current Year and it is anticipated that there will be none thereafter, the
results for the 11-month Current Year and the year ending December 31, 2005 are
also expected to be non-comparable to prior years.

12


Critical Accounting Policies:

During the 11-month Current Year, the Company adopted certain new
accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board
("FASB"), as described below and summarized in Note 1 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements. The adoption of these new accounting
standards did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position
or results of operations in the 11-month Current Year.

Several of the Company's accounting policies involve management
judgments and estimates that could be significant. The policies with the
greatest potential effect on the Company's consolidated results of operations
and financial position include the estimate of reserves to provide for the
collectibility of accounts receivable and the recovery value of inventory. For
accounts receivable, the Company estimates the net collectibility considering
historical, current and anticipated trends of co-op advertising deductions,
operational deductions taken by customers, markdowns provided to retail
customers to effectively flow goods through the retail channels, and the
possibility of non-collection due to the financial position of customers. For
inventory, the Company estimates the amount of goods that it will not be able to
sell in the normal course of business and writes down the value of these goods
to the recovery value expected to be realized through price reductions and
close-outs. Of the consolidated group, only Unzipped, was subject to inventory
risk.

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. The Company reviews all significant estimates
affecting the financial statements on a recurring basis and records the effect
of any adjustments when necessary.

Revenue during the 11-month Current Year relating to Unzipped and
Bright Star, was recognized upon shipment with related risk and title passing to
the customers. Estimates of losses for bad debts, returns and other allowances
were recorded at the time of the sale. In connection with its new licensing
model, the Company has entered into various trade name license agreements that
provide revenues based on minimum royalties and additional revenues based on a
percentage of defined sales. Minimum royalty revenue is recognized on a
straight-line basis over each period, as defined, in each license agreement.
Royalties exceeding the defined minimum amounts are recognized as income during
the period corresponding to the licensee's sales.

In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets," which changed the accounting for goodwill from an
amortization method to an impairment-only approach. Upon the Company's adoption
of SFAS No. 142 on February 1, 2002, the Company ceased amortizing goodwill. As
prescribed under SFAS No. 142, the Company had goodwill tested for impairment
during the 11-month Current Year, Fiscal 2004 and 2003, and no impairments were
necessary.

Impairment losses are recognized for long-lived assets, including
certain intangibles, used in operations when indicators of impairment are
present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those
assets are not sufficient to recover the assets' carrying amount. Impairment
losses are measured by comparing the fair value of the assets to their carrying
amount.

Other significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 1 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Summary of Operating Results:

The Company had net income of $241,000 for the 11-month Current Year as
compared to a net loss of $11.3 million for Fiscal 2004. In the 11-month Current
Year, there were $295,000 of net special charges and $2.5 million of interest
expense, as compared to $4.6 million of special charges and $3.1 million of
interest expense in Fiscal 2004.

The Company's operating income was $2.7 million in the 11-month Current
Year, compared to an operating loss of $8.2 million in Fiscal 2004.


Results of Operations

11-month Current Year compared to Fiscal 2004

Revenues. During the 11-month Current Year, consolidated net sales
decreased from Fiscal 2004 by $64.4 million to $60.4 million. There were no
wholesale and retail women's footwear sales in the 11-month Current Year because
the Company licensed its footwear operations in May 2003, compared to $38.9
million in Fiscal 2004. Unzipped's net sales decreased by $26.2 million from
$64.7 million in Fiscal 2004 to $38.5 million in the 11-month Current Year. This
decrease resulted primarily from transitioning of the jeans wear business from
an operating business to a licensing arrangement The Company entered into a
license agreement with TKO for BONGO jeans wear that was effective on August 1,
2004, which agreement was subsequently assigned to BAI. Bright Star's revenues
increased $771,000 to $21.9 million in the 11-month Current Year as compared to
$21.1 million in Fiscal 2004.

13


Licensing income increased $2.0 million to $8.6 million for the
11-month Current Year from $6.6 million in Fiscal 2004. The increase was due
primarily to revenue generated by new licenses as the Company transitioned from
an operating business to a licensing business.

Gross Profit. Consolidated gross profit decreased by $8.0 million,
from $28.8 million in Fiscal 2004, to $20.8 million in the 11-month Current
Year. There was no gross profit from wholesale and retail women's footwear in
the 11-month Current Year as compared to $8.4 million Fiscal 2004. Unzipped's
gross profit in the 11-month Current Year was $10.2 million as compared to $11.3
million in Fiscal 2004. Unzipped's gross profit in the 11-month Current Year
included a $7.6 million adjustment for the Shortfall Payment of $6.9 million
with $685,000 recorded as a reserve pending the outcome of its litigation with
the Company. See Notes 2 and 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Unzipped's Fiscal 2004's gross profit included an adjustment for the Shortfall
Payment of $1.6 million. Unzipped's gross profit in the 11-month Current Year
before the adjustment for the Shortfall Payment reflected the liquidation of the
remaining BONGO inventory in connection with the transition of the jeans wear
business to a licensing arrangement. Gross profit from Bright Star men's private
label footwear sales decreased to $2.0 million in the 11-month Current Year from
$2.1 million in Fiscal 2004. As a percent of net sales, Bright Star's gross
profit decreased from 9.7% in Fiscal 2004 to 9.1% in the 11-month Current Year,
resulting from its continuing concentration of sales to Wal-Mart, which are at
comparatively lower margins.

Operating Expenses. During the 11-month Current Year,
consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $14.6
million to $17.7 million, down from $32.3 million in Fiscal 2004. The Company's
selling, general and administrative expense related to activities other than
Unzipped decreased by $14.7 million to $8.4 million in the 11-month Current Year
as compared to $23.1 million in Fiscal 2004. The decrease resulted from the
Company's closing its wholesale and retail women's footwear operations and
transitioning to a licensing business beginning in the third quarter of Fiscal
2004. Selling, general and administrative expenses for Bright Star were $900,000
in the 11-month Current Year, a $100,000 decrease from $1.0 million in Fiscal
2004. Unzipped's selling, general and administrative expenses increased $84,000
in the 11-month Current Year to $9.3 million as compared to $9.2 million in
Fiscal 2004. This increase was due primarily to additional costs associated with
the transition of the jeans wear business to a license as well as costs incurred
relating to Unzipped litigation. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.

For the 11-month Current Year, the Company's special charges included
$434,000 of legal fees incurred by the Company relating to litigation involving
Unzipped and $99,000 of legal professional fees related to transferring Unzipped
wholesales business into a licensing business in the fiscal quarter ended April
30, 2004, partially offset by $238,000 of special income resulting from the
Company's termination of certain long term debt payments.

For Fiscal 2004, the Company's special charges included $3.1 million
for disposal of certain assets and retail store lease termination costs,
$743,000 related to severance pay for certain terminated employees, and $165,000
to terminate the Company's factoring contract, all resulting from the closing of
its wholesale women's footwear operations and retail stores. Additionally, there
were $583,000 of legal costs related to legal matters in Fiscal 2004 and $82,500
paid to Sweet related to certain contractual obligations resulting from the
Unzipped purchase.

Operating Income (Loss). As a result of the foregoing, the Company's
net operating income was $2.7 million in the 11-month Current Year as compared
to a net operating loss of $8.2 million for Fiscal 2004.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased by approximately
$600,000 in the 11-month Current Year to $2.5 million, compared to $3.1 million
in Fiscal 2004. Included in interest expense in the 11-month Current Year was
$434,000 from Unzipped's revolving credit facilities, as compared to $651,000 in
Fiscal 2004, a decrease of $217,000. The Unzipped interest expense decrease
resulted from lower average outstanding borrowing as Unzipped transitioned out
of the operating jeans wear business to a license and, to a lesser extent, from
lower average interest rates then were available in Fiscal 2004. There was no
interest expense under the revolving credit facility in the 11-month Current
Year because there were no operations relating to footwear, compared to $239,000
in Fiscal 2004. Also included in interest expense in the 11-month Current Year
was $644,000 relating to the 8% senior subordinated note issued to Sweet in
connection with the Unzipped acquisition, as compared to $761,000 in Fiscal
2004. Interest expense in the 11-month Current Year associated with the asset
backed notes issued by IPH, a subsidiary of the Company was $1.4 million as
compared to $1.5 million in Fiscal 2004.

Income Tax Expense. . In the 11-month Current Year no tax
expense was recorded. In Fiscal 2004, the Company recorded $58,000 of income tax
provision, consisting of statutory minimum taxes. At December 31, 2004, the
Company has a net deferred tax asset of approximately $3.6 million that
management believes will be recoverable from profits anticipated to be generated
over the next few years. The valuation allowance of $21.4 million represents
amounts that cannot be assured of recoverability. See Note 12 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.

Net income (loss). As a result of the foregoing, the Company recorded
net income of $241,000 in the 11-month Current Year, compared to a net loss of
$11.3 million for Fiscal 2004.

Fiscal 2004 Compared to Fiscal 2003

Revenues. In Fiscal 2004, consolidated net sales decreased from Fiscal
2003 by $26.8 million to $124.8 million. Wholesale and retail women's footwear
sales decreased by $42.9 million from $81.8 million in Fiscal 2003 to $38.9
million in Fiscal 2004, primarily as a result of the Company's licensing of its


14


footwear operations in May 2003. Unzipped's net sales increased by $8.8 million
to $64.7 million in Fiscal 2004, from $55.9 million in Fiscal 2003. It should be
noted, however, that Fiscal 2003 included only nine months of Unzipped's sales,
which were included in the consolidated results beginning on May 1, 2002,
following the Company's acquisition of the remaining 50% interest in Unzipped on
April 23, 2002. For the comparable nine month period, Unzipped's net sales
decreased in Fiscal 2004 by $8.4 million. Deductions for returns and allowances
for Unzipped in Fiscal 2004 were $7.2 million or 10.0% of its gross sales, as
compared to $3.6 million, or 6.1% of its gross sales during Fiscal 2003. This
increase reflects a shift in Unzipped's customer base toward department stores
that require more vendor support in the form of markdowns and advertising
contributions. Bright Star men's private label footwear revenues increased $7.1
million or 50.9% to $21.1 million in Fiscal 2004, primarily as a result of a
growth in its business with Wal-Mart, which now represents over 90% of Bright
Star's sales..

Licensing income increased $1.5 million to $6.6 million in Fiscal 2004
from $5.1 million in Fiscal 2003. Comparable licensing income increased $1.8
million, as Fiscal 2003 licensing income included $414,000 of royalties from
Unzipped, which royalty payment ceased with the Company's acquisition of the
remaining interest in Unzipped on April 23, 2002. The increase was due primarily
to revenue generated by new licenses as the Company transitioned from an
operating footwear business to a licensing business.

Gross Profit. Consolidated gross profit decreased by $11.7 million to
$28.8 million in Fiscal 2004 from $40.5 million in Fiscal 2003. Gross profit
from wholesale and retail women's footwear decreased by $14.2 million to $8.4
million in Fiscal 2004, from $22.6 million in Fiscal 2003. This decrease was due
primarily to the lower sales volume resulting from the Company's transition to a
licensing business. In transitioning its wholesale and retail women's footwear
operations, the Company also experienced lower gross profit margins as a
percentage of net sales in the second half of Fiscal 2004, down from 27.6 % in
Fiscal 2003 to 21.6% in Fiscal 2004, due to the Company's liquidation of its
wholesale and retail inventories. Unzipped's gross profit in Fiscal 2004 was
$11.3 million, or 17.4 % of net revenues as compared to $9.7 million, or 17.3%
of net revenues in Fiscal 2003. Gross profit from Bright Star men's private
label footwear sales increased to $2.1 million in Fiscal 2004, from $1.6 million
in Fiscal 2003. As a percent of net sales, Bright Star's gross profit decreased
from 11.7% in Fiscal 2003 to 9.7% in Fiscal 2004, resulting from its increases
in sales to Wal-Mart, which are at comparatively lower margins.

Operating Expenses. During Fiscal 2004, consolidated selling, general
and administrative expenses decreased by $5.6 million to $32.3 million from
$37.9 million in Fiscal 2003. Selling, general and administrative expenses
related to the Company's wholesale and retail women's footwear operations
decreased by $8.3 million to $22.2 million in Fiscal 2004 as compared to $30.5
million in Fiscal 2003. The decrease resulted from the Company's closing its
wholesale and retail women's footwear operations and transitioning to a
licensing business during the second half of Fiscal 2004. The Company
anticipates further decreases in selling, general and administrative expenses
for Fiscal 2005, its first full year under the licensing model. Unzipped's
selling, general and administrative expenses increased $2.7 million in Fiscal
2004 to $9.2 million, as compared to $6.5 million in Fiscal 2003. It should be
noted that Fiscal 2003 included approximately nine months of Unzipped's selling,
general and administrative expenses, which were included in the consolidated
results beginning on May 1, 2002, concurrent with the Company's acquisition of
the remaining 50% interest in Unzipped on April 23, 2002. For the comparable
nine month period, Unzipped's selling, general and administrative expense
increased in Fiscal 2004 by $264,000. As a percentage of net sales, Unzipped's
selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 14.3% in Fiscal 2004
as compared to 11.6% in Fiscal 2003, as non-variable expenses (primarily
payroll) increased against a declining net sales base. Selling, general and
administrative expenses for Bright Star were $940,000 in Fiscal 2004, virtually
flat with Fiscal 2003.

During Fiscal 2004, the Company's special charges included $3.1 million
for disposal of certain assets and lease termination costs, $743,000 related to
severance pay for certain terminated employees, and $165,000 to terminate a
factoring arrangement, all resulting from the closing of its wholesale women's
footwear operations and retail stores. Additionally, there were $583,000 of
legal costs related to prior year legal matters and $82,500 paid to Sweet
related to certain contractual obligations resulting from the purchase of the
50% interest in Unzipped. For Fiscal 2003, the Company's special charges
included an impairment loss and lease obligation of $3.1 million resulting from
the closing of certain retail stores, $298,000 of legal costs related to prior
year legal matters, and $145,000 related to severance pay for certain terminated
employees.

Operating Loss. As a result of the foregoing, the Company's net
operating loss was $8.2 million in Fiscal 2004 as compared to $961,000 for
Fiscal 2003.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased by $300,000 in Fiscal 2004
to $3.1 million, compared to $3.4 million in Fiscal 2003. Included in interest
expense in Fiscal 2004, was $651,000 from Unzipped's revolving credit facility,
as compared to $846,000 in Fiscal 2003, a decrease of $195,000. It should be
noted that Fiscal 2003 included approximately nine months of interest expense
related to Unzipped, which was included in the consolidated results beginning on
May 1, 2002, concurrent with the Company acquisition of the remaining 50%
interest in Unzipped. The Unzipped interest expense decrease resulted from lower
average outstanding borrowing and, to a lesser extent, from lower average
interest rates and as compared to Fiscal 2003. Interest expense under the
revolving credit facility for the operating footwear business decreased by
$535,000 to $239,000, compared to $774,000 in Fiscal 2003, primarily due to
lower average outstanding borrowings as the Company closed its operating
wholesale and retail footwear business, and to a significantly lesser extent, to
lower average interest rates. Also included in interest expense in Fiscal 2004
was $761,000 from the 8% senior subordinated note in connection with the
Unzipped acquisition, as compared to $660,000 in Fiscal 2003 (which included
only nine months of interest expense as the note was issued in May 2002). See
Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Interest expense in
Fiscal 2004 associated with the asset backed notes issued by IPH, a subsidiary
of the Company was $1.5 million, as compared to $692,000 in Fiscal 2003. Since
the asset backed notes were issued in August, 2002, Fiscal 2003 results included
approximately five and a half months of interest expense. . Included in Fiscal
2003 interest expense was $346,000 from an adjustment of interest payments
associated with a $3.5 million master lease and loan agreement with Bank One
Leasing Corp. in connection with a litigation settlement. See Note 5 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

15


Equity (Income) Losses in Joint Venture. During Fiscal 2003, the
Company eliminated the remaining $250,000 liability in connection with the
acquisition of Unzipped.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit). In the year ended January 31, 2004, the
Company recorded $58,000 of income tax provision, consisting of statutory
minimum taxes. In Fiscal 2003, the Company recorded $139,000 of federal income
tax benefits resulting from the utilization of net operating losses from prior
years, due to changes in the tax laws. At January 31, 2004, the Company has a
net deferred tax asset of approximately $3.6 million that management believes
will be recoverable from profits anticipated to be generated over the next few
years. The valuation allowance of $20.5 million represents amounts that cannot
be assured of recoverability. See Note 12 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.

Net Loss. As a result of the foregoing, the Company sustained a net
loss of $11.3 million for Fiscal 2004, compared to a net loss of $3.9 million
for Fiscal 2003.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Working Capital. Working capital (current assets less current
liabilities) decreased by $1.9 million to a $6.5 million deficit at December 31,
2004 from a $4.6 million deficit at January 31, 2004, resulting primarily from
the operating losses of Unzipped, (which although offset by the Shortfall
Payment of $7.6 million, is reflected on the Balance Sheet as a reduction in
long term debt) partially offset by working capital generated from the licensing
business.

The Company continues to rely upon cash generated from operations,
especially licensing and men's private label activity to finance its operations.
Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $4.4 million in the 11
months ended December 31, 2004, as compared to $11.2 million in Fiscal 2004. The
Company believes that such cash from operations will be sufficient to satisfy
its anticipated working capital requirements for the foreseeable future.

Capital expenditures. Capital expenditures were $30,000 for the
11-month Current Year, as compared to $248,000 for Fiscal 2004. Fiscal 2004
capital expenditures were primarily comprised of office equipment acquired in
the third quarter ended October 31, 2003, when the Company closed its Valhalla
office and relocated certain employees to its headquarters in New York City.

Financing Activities. Financing activities used $6.4 million during the
11-month Current Year as compared to $10.0 million used during Fiscal 2004. Of
the cash used in financing activities, $12.8 million was used to pay-off
revolving notes payable to factors under the Unzipped Credit Facility described
below, and $2.3 million was used to reduce the principal of $20 million
asset-backed notes secured by intellectual property assets. Offsetting this
amount was an additional $3.6 million from IPH's amended asset-backed notes,
$2.5 million borrowed from TKO, $2.2 million from common stock issuance and $1.7
million provided from the proceeds of the exercise of stock options.

Matters Pertaining to Unzipped. On April 23, 2002, the Company acquired
the remaining 50% interest in Unzipped from Sweet for three million shares of
the Company's common stock and the Note. Until August 5, 2004, the Company had a
management agreement with Sweet for a term ending January 31, 2005 (the
"Management Agreement"), which provided for Sweet to manage the operations of
Unzipped in return for, commencing in Fiscal 2004, a management fee based upon
certain specified percentages of net income that Unzipped would achieve during
the three-year term. In addition, Sweet guaranteed that the net income, as
defined, of Unzipped shall be no less than $1.7 million for each year during the
term commencing in Fiscal 2004 (the "Guarantee"). In the event that the
Guarantee is not met, Sweet is obligated to pay the difference between the
actual net income, as defined, and the Guarantee (the "Shortfall Payment"). The
Company also terminated the Management Agreement, the supply agreement with
Azteca and the distribution agreement with ADS on August 5, 2004. See Notes 2
and 8 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For the 11-month
Current Year, Unzipped had a net loss (as defined, for the purpose of
determining if the Guarantee has been met) of $6.4 million, resulting in an
adjustment of Shortfall Payment of $7.6 million based on a $1.7 million annual
Guarantee. $7.6 million of this adjustment has been recorded in the consolidated
income statement as a reduction of Unzipped's cost of sales and on the balance
sheet as a reduction of the 8% senior subordinated note due to Sweet, as
provided for in the Management Agreement. The Company believes that it is
entitled to a quarterly Guarantee of $425,000 for each of the third and fourth
quarters of the 11-month Current Year under the management agreement with Sweet
notwithstanding that it was terminated on August 5, 2004. However, for financial
statement purposes, the Company has pro-rated the $425,000 Guarantee relating to
the third quarter to the termination date, and has established a reserve of
$685,000 for the difference pending the outcome of its litigation. See Note 2 of
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. After adjusting for the
Shortfall Payment, Unzipped's reported net income for 11-month Current Year was
$461,000.

For each of the quarters ended July 31, October 31, and December 31,
2004, the Company did not make an interest payment on the Note to partially
offset the Shortfall Payment of January 31, 2004 due from Sweet. Such interest
payment is to be resumed after the Shortfall Payment is satisfied.

Revolving Credit Facilities. On January 23, 2002, the Company entered
into a three-year $20 million credit facility ("the Credit Facility") with CIT
Commercial Services. Borrowings under the Credit Facility were formula based and


16


originally included a $5 million over advance provision with interest at 1.00%
above the prime rate. In June 2002, the Company agreed to amend the Credit
Facility to increase the over advance provision to $7 million and include
certain retail inventory in the availability formula. Borrowings under the
amended Credit Facility bore interest at 1.5% above the prime rate.

At December 31, 2004, there were no outstanding borrowings under the
Credit Facility which was terminated by an agreement dated January 15, 2004

On February 25, 2003 Unzipped entered into a two-year $25 million
credit facility ("the Unzipped Credit Facility") with GE Capital Commercial
Services, Inc. ("GECCS") . Borrowings under the Unzipped Credit Facility were
limited by advance rates against eligible accounts receivable and inventory
balances, as defined. Under the facility, Unzipped may also arrange for letters
of credit in an amount up to $5 million. The borrowings bear interest at a rate
of 2.25% per annum in excess of the 30 day Commercial Paper rate or 3%,
whichever is greater. The Unzipped Credit Facility was terminated on October 31,
2004.

Bond Financing. In August 2002 IPH issued in a private placement $20
million of asset-backed notes secured by intellectual property assets (trade
names, trademarks and license payments thereon). The notes have a 7-year term
with a fixed interest rate of 7.93% with quarterly principal and interest
payments of approximately $859,000. The notes are subject to a liquidity reserve
account of $2.9 million, funded by a deposit of a portion of the proceeds of the
notes. The net proceeds of $16.2 million were used to reduce amounts due by the
Company under its existing revolving credit facilities. Costs incurred to obtain
this financing totaled approximately $2.4 million which have been deferred and
are being amortized over the life of the debt. At December 31, 2004, the
unamortized portion of such costs was $1.9 million. As of December 31, 2004,
there is $18.9 million outstanding under the notes.

During the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2004, IPH amended the
asset-backed notes whereby it borrowed an additional $3.6 million. The
additional borrowing matures in August, 2009 with a floating interest rate of
LIBOR + 4.45%, with quarterly principal and interest payments and $500,000 of
interest prepaid at closing. The net proceeds of $2.9 million were be used for
general working capital purposes. Costs incurred to obtain this financing
totaling approximately $178,500 were deferred and will be amortized over the
life of the debt.

Other. The Company's cash requirements fluctuate from time to time due
to, among other factors, seasonal requirements, including the timing of receipt
of merchandise. The Company believes that it will be able to satisfy its ongoing
cash requirements for the foreseeable future, primarily with cash flow from
operations. However, if the Company's plans change or its assumptions prove to
be incorrect, it could be required to obtain additional capital that may not be
available to it on acceptable terms, or at all.

The following is a summary of contractual cash obligations for the
periods indicated that existed as of December 31, 2004, and is based on
information appearing in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (amounts
in thousands):



17






Contractual Obligations Total 2005 2006 -2007 2008-2009 After 2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notes payable - Bank $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Long-term debt 21,930 2,563 6,532 9,842 2,993
Operating leases 586 324 262 - -
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Contractual Cash
Obligations $22,516 $2,887 $6,794 $9,842 $ 2,993
============================================================================



Seasonality

The Company's quarterly results may fluctuate quarter to quarter as a
result of its licensees' businesses as well as a result of holidays, weather,
the timing of product shipments, market acceptance of Company products, the mix,
pricing and presentation of the products offered and sold, the hiring and
training of personnel, the timing of inventory write downs, fluctuations in the
cost of materials, the mix between wholesale and licensing businesses, and the
incurrence of operating costs beyond the Company's control as may be caused
general economic conditions, and other unpredictable factors such as the action
of competitors. Accordingly, the results of operations in any quarter will not
necessarily be indicative of the results that may be achieved for a full fiscal
year or any future quarter.

In addition, the timing of the receipt of future revenues could be
impacted by the recent trend among retailers in the Company's industry to order
goods closer to a particular selling season than they have historically done so.
The Company continues to seek to expand and diversify its product lines under
license to help reduce the dependence on any particular product line and lessen
the impact of the seasonal nature of its business. The success of the Company,
however, will still largely remain dependent on its and its licensees ability to
contract with and retain key licensees, to predict accurately upcoming fashion
trends among its customer base, to build and maintain brand awareness and to
fulfill the product requirements of the retail channel within the shortened
timeframe required. Unanticipated changes in consumer fashion preferences,
slowdowns in the United States economy, changes in the prices of supplies,
consolidation of retail establishments, among other factors noted in this
report, could adversely affect the Company's future operating results. The
Company's products are marketed primarily for Fall and Spring seasons, with
slightly higher volumes of products sold during the second fiscal quarter.

Effects of Inflation

The Company does not believe that the relatively moderate rates of
inflation experienced over the past few years in the United States, where it
primarily competes, have had a significant effect on revenues or profitability.

Net Operating Loss Carry Forwards

At December 31, 2004, the Company had available net operating losses
("NOL") of approximately $54.6 million for income tax purposes, which expire in
the years 2006 through 2024. Because of "ownership changes" (as defined in
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code) occurring in previous fiscal years,
the utilization of approximately $4.6 million of the net operating losses is
limited to $602,000 per year and expires in the years 2006 through 2007. The
remaining $50.0 million is not subject to such limitation and expires 2009
through 2024. Included in the NOL is $4.8 million as of December 31, 2004 from
the exercises of stock options, the benefit of the utilization of this NOL will
go into additional paid in capital. See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.


New Accounting Standards

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, "Inventory Costs,"
which clarifies the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense,
freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage) by requiring these items
to be recognized as current-period charges. SFAS No. 151 is effective for
inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005, with
earlier application permitted. The adoption of SFAS No. 151 will have no impact
on our future results of operations or our financial position.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, "Exchanges of Monetary
Assets," which addresses the measurement of exchanges of nonmonetary assets and
eliminates the exception from fair value measurement for non monetary exchanges
of similar productive assets and replaces it with an exception for exchanges
that do not have commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 is effective for nonmonetary
asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005, with
earlier application permitted. The adoption of SFAS No. 153 will have no impact
on our future results of operations or our financial position.

18



In December 2004, the FASB issued FAS No. 123(R), "Share-Based
Payment," an amendment of FASB Statements 123 and 95. FAS No, 123(R) replaced
FAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," and supersedes APB
Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees." This statement
requires companies to recognize the fair value of stock options and other
stock-based compensation to employees beginning with fiscal periods beginning
after June 15, 2005. This means that the Company will be required to implement
FAS No, 123(R) no later than the quarter beginning July 1, 2005. The Company
currently measures stock-based compensation in accordance with APB Opinion No.
25, as discussed above. The impact on the company's financial condition or
results of operations will depend on the number and terms of stock options
outstanding on the date of change, as well as future options that may be
granted.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

The Company limits exposure to foreign currency fluctuations in most of
its purchase commitments through provisions that require vendor payments in
United States dollars. Our primary interest rate exposure relates to our
variable rate debt. The primary interest rate exposure on floating rate
financing arrangements are with respect to LIBOR. We had approximately $3.4
million in variable rate debt at December 31, 2004. As of December 31, 2004, a
hypothetical immediate 200 basis point change in interest rates, as they relate
to the cash borrowings then outstanding under our variable rate financial
instruments, would not materially impact our earning and cash flow over a
one-year period.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The financial statements and supplementary data required to be
submitted in response to this Item 8 are set forth in Part IV, Item 15 of this
report.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its
management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered
by this report. Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and
principal financial officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures are effective in reaching a reasonable level of assurance that
information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files
or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Securities and
Exchange Commission's rules and forms.

The principal executive officer and principal financial officer also
conducted an evaluation of internal control over financial reporting ("Internal
Control") to determine whether any changes in Internal Control occurred during
the quarter ended December 31, 2004 that have materially affected or which are
reasonably likely to materially affect Internal Control. Based on that
evaluation, there has been no such change during the quarter ended December 31,
2004.


Item 9B. Other Information

On March 29, 2005 the Company entered into a new employment agreement
with Neil Cole to serve as the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer
through December 31, 2007. See Item 11-Executive Compensation for a description
of this employment agreement. Pursuant to the employment agreement, on that date
the Company granted Mr. Cole 10-year immediately exercisable stock options to
purchase 800,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $4.62 per share. On
that date the Company also granted to Steven Mendelow, a director of the
Company, 10-year immedaitely exercisable options to purchase 20,250 shares of
the Company's common stock at $4.62 per share. The options granted to Mr. Cole
and Mr. Mendelow were granted under the Company's 2002 Stock Option Plan.

PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

A list of the directors and executive officers of the Company and their
respective ages and positions are as follows:



Name Age Position
- ---- --- -----------------

Neil Cole 48 Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
Deborah Sorell Stehr 42 Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel
David Conn 37 Executive Vice President
Warren Clamen 40 Chief Financial Officer
Richard Danderline 51 Vice President - Finance
Barry Emanuel 63 Director
Steven Mendelow 62 Director
Robert D'Loren 47 Director
Michael Caruso 56 Director
Michael Groveman 44 Director
Drew Cohen 36 Director


19


Neil Cole has been Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company since February 23, 1993. Mr. Cole founded the Company in
1992. From February through April 1992, Mr. Cole served as a director and as
acting President of the Company. Mr. Cole also served as Chairman of the Board,
President, Treasurer and a director of New Retail Concepts, Inc. ("NRC"), from
its inception in 1986 until it was merged with and into the Company in August
1998. Mr. Cole is an attorney who graduated from Hofstra law school in 1982. In
April 2003, Mr. Cole, without admitting or denying the SEC's allegations,
consented to the entry by the SEC of an administrative order in which Mr. Cole
was ordered to cease and desist from violating or causing any violations or
future violation of certain books and records and periodic reporting provisions
and the anti-fraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In
addition, Mr. Cole also paid a $75,000 civil monetary fine.

Deborah Sorell Stehr joined the Company in December 1998 as Vice
President and General Counsel, and was promoted to Senior Vice President in
November 1999. She has served as Secretary of the Company since June 1999 and
sits on the Board of Directors of numerous of its subsidiaries. From September
1996 to December 1998, Ms. Sorell Stehr was Associate General Counsel with Nine
West Group Inc. ("Nine West"), a women's' footwear corporation with sales
approximating $2.0 billion, where Ms. Sorell Stehr was primarily responsible for
overseeing legal affairs relating to domestic and international contracts,
intellectual property, licensing, general corporate matters, litigation and
claims. Prior to joining Nine West, Ms. Sorell Stehr practiced law for nine
years at private law firms in New York City and Chicago in the areas of
corporate law and commercial litigation.

David Conn joined the Company in May 2004 as Executive Vice President.
Mr. Conn had previously been with the Company from 1995 to 2000 in the capacity
as Vice President of Marketing. After leaving the Company in May 2000, Mr. Conn
joined Columbia House where he oversaw the company's internet business
responsible for the online advertising, sales promotion and customer retention
on the internet. During his tenure, Columbia House grew to become one of the ten
largest e-commerce sites on the internet. Mr. Conn has also been active in the
Direct Marketing Association serving on its Ethics Policy Committee. Mr. Conn's
prior experience includes marketing positions with The Discovery Channel and
CCM, a New York based marketing and promotion agency.

Warren Clamen joined the Company on March 9, 2005 as the Company's
Chief Financial Officer. From June 2001 until March 2005 Mr. Clamen served as
Vice President of Finance of Columbia House, one of the world's largest
licensees of content for music and film. From December 1998 to June 2001, he was
Vice President of Finance of Marvel Entertainment, Inc., one of the world's
largest public licensing companies. Prior to that time, Mr. Clamen served as the
Director, International Management of Biochem Pharma Inc. a public company
located in Montreal, Canada, that has its shares traded on the NASDAQ exchange,
and a Senior Manager at Richter, Usher and Vineberg, an accounting firm also
located in Montreal, Canada. Mr. Clamen is a Certified Public Accountant and a
Chartered Accountant and received a Bachelor of Commerce and Graduate Diploma in
Public Accounting from McGill University in Montreal.

Richard Danderline, served as the Company's Executive Vice President,
Finance and Operations from June 2000 to December 31, 2004 and effective January
1, 2005, has been employed by the Company as its Vice President of Finance
pursuant to an agreement. For the 13 years prior to joining the Company, he
served as Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of AeroGroup
International, Inc ("Aerosoles"), a privately held footwear company. Prior to
joining Aerosoles, he served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. Mr. Danderline's experience also includes serving
as Vice President and Controller of Energy Asserts International, Inc. and as
Vice President and Controller of XOIL Energy Resources, Inc. Mr. Danderline is
certified public accountant who began his career with Touche Ross & Co., the
predecessor of Deloitte & Touche LLP.

Barry Emanuel has been a director of the Company since May 1993. For
more than the past five years, Mr. Emanuel has served as President of Copen
Associates, Inc., a textile manufacturer located in New York, New York.

Steven Mendelow has been a director of the Company since December 1999
and has been a principal with the accounting firm of Konigsberg Wolf & Co. and
its predecessor, which is located in New York, New York since 1972. Mr. Mendelow
was a director of NRC from April 1, 1992 until NRC merged into the Company in
August 1998.

Robert D'Loren has over twenty years of experience in finance-related
businesses. Since 2001, he has served as President and CEO of UCC Capital
Corporation. UCC is an industry leader in fixed income investing in companies
with core assets in intellectual property. Prior to forming UCC Capital
Corporation Mr. D'Loren served from 1998 to 2001 as COO of CAK Universal Credit
Corporation, a company that was in a similar business to UCC Capital
Corporation. From 1985 to 1998, Mr. D'Loren was President and CEO of D'Loren
Organization, which was involved in asset management, principal transactions in
corporate acquisitions and real estate, and in the restructuring and sale of


20


non-performing and performing loan assets on behalf of clients that included
Citibank, Bank of America, the Resolution Trust, Freddie Mac, the Department of
Housing and Urban Development, and the FDIC, with a transaction volume in excess
of $3 billion. Before forming his own company in 1985, Mr. D'Loren served as an
asset manager for Fosterlane Management, after serving as a manager with the
international consulting firm of Deloitte & Touche, where he served a
diversified client base. Mr. D'Loren has served as a director or board advisor
to Business Loan Express, Bike Athletic Company and Bill Blass, Ltd. He is a
Certified Public Accountant and holds a Master's Degree from Columbia University
and a Bachelor of Science Degree from New York University.

Michael Caruso brings to Candie's over 30 years of experience in
branded apparel manufacturing, sales, marketing and licensing. He co-founded
Michael Caruso & Company in 1978 and created the BONGO brand name in 1982. He
headed Michael Caruso & Company, which sold BONGO branded jeans and apparel,
from its inception until 1998, when the company was sold to Candie's, Inc. Mr.
Caruso currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors for St. Johns
Medical Center, Charture Institute and the Jackson Hole Land Trust, and manages
a diversified portfolio of family investments. Mr. Caruso is a 1970 graduate of
the University of Texas.

Michael Groveman has served since 1990 as the Chief Executive Officer
of Bill Blass Ltd., a leader in sophisticated fashion, with over 40 licenses for
products ranging from accessories and eyewear to furniture. Mr. Groveman is
responsible for creating and executing the strategic direction and vision for
the company. Prior to joining Bill Blass, he was a manager in the accounting
firm of Ferro, Berdon and Company in New York. Mr. Groveman has a B.A. in
accounting from Long Island University C.W. Post.

Drew Cohen is the Managing Director, Business & Legal Affairs for Music
Theatre International (MTI), which represents the dramatic performing rights of
classic properties such as "West Side Story," and "Fiddler on the Roof," and
licenses over 50,000 performances a year around the world. Before joining MTI in
September,2002, Mr. Cohen was from July 2001 the Director of Investments for Big
Wave NV, and prior to that, General Manager for GlassNote Records, an
independent record company. Mr. Cohen holds a B.S. degree from Tufts University,
a J.D. from Fordham Law School, and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.

All directors hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders
or until their successors are elected and qualified. All officers serve at the
discretion of the Board of Directors.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Board has a Nominating/Governance Committee, consisting of Mr.
Mendelow, Mr. Emanuel, Mr. Cohen and Mr. Groveman whose functions now include
those of the Compensation Committee, which was consolidated into the
Nominating/Governance Committee during the 11-month Current Year. Prior to
expanding the duties and responsibilities of the Governance Committee to include
those relating to compensations decisions as to executive compensation were made
by the Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors. During the
11-month Current Year, none of the executive officers of the Company served on
the board of directors or the compensation committee of any other entity, that
has officers that serve on the Company's Board of Directors or
Nominating/Governance Committee or that served on the Compensation Committee.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Section 16(a) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company
officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10 percent of
a registered class of the Company equity securities, to file reports of
ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Officers, directors and greater
than 10 percent owners are required by certain SEC regulations to furnish the
Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely on the Company's review of the copies of such forms
received by it, the Company believes that during the 11-month Current Year,
there was compliance with the filing requirements applicable to its officers,
directors and 10% stockholders of the Common Stock, except that a Form 4 to
report a grant of options to Drew Cohen in April 2004 was filed two days late
and a Form 4 with respect to the purchase of shares of common stock by Robert
D'Loren was filed two days late. The Form 4s relating to the automatic grants of
shares of common stock in March 2004 to Messrs. Caruso, D'Loren, Emanuel and
Mendelow under the Company's Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan were
also filed several days late. Late forms were also filed by Hubert Guez and
Sweet in June 2004 with respect to various sales of common stock.

Audit Committee

The Company has an audit committee of the Board of Directors ("Audit
Committee") consisting of Mr. Mendelow, Mr. Groveman and Mr. Cohen. Each member
of the Audit Committee is an "independent director" under the Marketplace Rules
of the NASD applicable to companies whose securities are listed on NASDAQ and
the Company's Board has determined that Mr. Mendelow is the Audit Committee's
financial expert under applicable SEC rules and NASD Marketplace Rules.

Code of Business Conduct

The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct that applies to its
employees, including its senior management, including its chief executive
officer, chief financial officer, controller and persons performing similar
functions. Copies of the Code of Business Conduct are available without charge
upon written request directed to Corporate Secretary, Candie's, Inc., 215 West
40th Street, New York, New, York 10018.

21




Item 11. Executive Compensation

The following table sets forth all compensation paid or accrued by the
Company for the 11-month Current Year, Fiscal 2004 and 2003, to or for the Chief
Executive Officer and for the other persons that served as executive officers of
the Company during the 11-month Current Year whose salaries for the 11-month
Current Year exceeded $100,000 (collectively, the "Named Persons"):



Summary Compensation Table
Long-Term
Compensation
Annual Compensation Awards
Other Securities
Fiscal Salary Bonus (1) Annual Com- Underlying All Other
Year pensation Options Compensations
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Neil Cole 11-month Current Year $458,333 $100,000 $ - -$ 136,518(2)
Chairman, President & Fiscal 2004 483,333 - - - 62,700(2)
Chief Executive Officer Fiscal 2003 487,500 - 615,000 31,503(2)

Deborah Sorell Stehr 11-month Current Year 220,780 - - 40,000 -
Senior Vice President & Fiscal 2004 227,440 - - 60,000
General Counsel Fiscal 2003 215,625 - - - -

David Conn 11-month Current Year 125,000 - - 200,000 -
Executive Vice President Fiscal 2004 - - - - -
Fiscal 2003 - - - - -

Richard Danderline 11-month Current Year 206,250 - - - -
Executive Vice President - Fiscal 2004 217,500 - - - -
Finance & Operations Fiscal 2003 219,375 50,000 - - -


(1) Represents bonuses accrued under employment agreements.

(2) Represents Company paid premiums on a life insurance for the benefit of the
beneficiaries of Mr. Cole.

Option Grants in the 11-month Current Year

The following table provides information with respect to individual
stock options granted during the 11-month Current Year to each of the Named
Persons who received options during the 11-month Current Year:



Number of
Securities % of Total Potential Realizable Value
Underlying Options Granted Exercise at Assumed Annual Rates
Options to Employees Price Expiration of Stock Price Appreciation
Name Granted(#) in Fiscal Year ($/share) Date for Option Term (3)
- ---- ---------- --------------- ---------- -------------- ----------------------------
5%($) 10%($)

Neil Cole - - - - - -
Deborah Sorell Stehr 40,000(1) 2.7% $2.66 8/20/2014 66,914 169,574
David Conn 200,000(2) 13.7% $2.54 5/27/2014 319,478 809,621
Richard Danderline - - - - - -


(1) Ms. Stehr's 40,000 options vest as to one-third on each of August 20, 2004,
2005 and 2006.

(2) Mr. Conn's options vest 75,000 on May 28, 2004, 50,000 on May 28, 2005 and
75,000 on May 28, 2006.

(3) The potential realizable value columns of the table illustrate values that
might be realized upon exercise of the options immediately prior to their
expiration, assuming the Company's Common Stock appreciates at the
compounded rates specified over the term of the options. These amounts do
not take into account provisions of options providing for termination of
the option following termination of employment or non-transferability of
the options and do not make any provision for taxes associated with
exercise. Because actual gains will depend upon, among other things, future
performance of the Common Stock, there can be no assurance that the amounts
reflected in this table will be achieved.

The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2004,
with respect to exercised and unexercised stock options held by the Named
Persons. Mr. Cole, Ms. Stehr and Mr. Danderline exercised 410,000, 100,000 and
135,000 options, respectively, during the 11-month Current Year.



22


Aggregated Options Exercises in the 11-month Current Year and Year-End Option Values

Number of Securities Value of Unexercised
Shares Acquired Underlying Unexercised In-The-Money Options
on Value Options at December 31, 2004(#) at December 31, 2004($) (1)
------------------------------- ---------------------------
Name Exercise (#) Realized ($) Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
------------ ------------ ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------

Neil Cole 410,000 1,453,900 2,685,875 200,000 7,222,777 530,000
Deborah Sorell Stehr 100,000 377,668 160,000 30,000 529,650 82,200
Richard Danderline 135,000 496,767 - 25,000 - 102,970


(1) An option is "in-the-money" if the year-end closing market
price per share of the Company's Common Stock exceeds the
exercise price of such options. The closing market price on
December 31, 2004 was $5.40.

Employment Contracts and Termination and Change-in-Control Arrangements

On March 29, 2005, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement
with Neil Cole to serve as President and Chief Executive Officer for a term
expiring on December 31, 2007, at an annual base salary for $500,000 in 2005,
$550,000 in 2006 and $600,000 in 2007. In addition, the Employment Agreement
provides for the Company to pay to Mr. Cole an additional salary of $250,000,
payable in four (4) equal installments upon the signing of the Employment
Agreement, and April 1, July 1 and October 3, 2005, provided that Mr. Cole is
employed by the Company on such respective dates. Under the Employment
Agreement, for each year in which the Company meets at least 100% of its
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization of fixed assets
and intangible assets ("EBITDA") target, (as determined by the Board), the
Company will pay to Mr. Cole a bonus in an amount equal to $100,000 for 2005,
$150,000 for 2006 and $200,000 for 2007. In addition, Mr. Cole shall receive a
bonus equal to 5% of the amount, if any, by which the Company's actual EBITDA,
for a fiscal year exceeds the greater of (a) such EBITDA, and (b) the highest
amount of actual EBITDA, previously achieved during the Term, provided that the
amounts of prior negative EBITDA shall reduce such EBITDA in the year for which
the determination is made in determining whether and by how much such amounts
set forth in (a) and (b) were exceeded. Mr. Cole is also entitled to customary
benefits, including participation in management incentive and benefit plans,
reimbursement for automobile expenses, reasonable travel and entertainment
expenses and a life insurance policy to benefit Mr. Cole's designated
beneficiaries in the sum of $5,000,000. The Employment Agreement provides that
Mr. Cole will receive an amount equal to three times his annual compensation,
plus accelerated vesting or payment of deferred compensation, options, stock
appreciation rights or any other benefits payable to Mr. Cole in the event that
within twelve months of a "Change In Control", as defined in the Agreement, Mr.
Cole is terminated by the Company without "Cause" or if Mr. Cole terminates his
agreement for "Good Reason", as such terms are defined in the Agreement.
Pursuant to the Agreement Mr. Cole was granted, under one of the Company's stock
option plans, options to purchase 800,000 shares of common stock at $4.62 per
share, which options vested immediately.

The Company entered into an agreement with Mr. Cole that provides that
if the Company is sold and immediately thereafter Mr. Cole is no longer employed
by the Company or its successor in the capacity in which he was employed prior
to the sale, Mr. Cole would receive a payment equal to 5% of the sale price in
the event that sale price is at least $5.00 per share or equivalent with respect
to an asset sale. Mr. Cole agreed not to compete with the Company for a period
of twelve months after a sale resulting in such payment.

The Company has entered into an employment agreement with Deborah
Sorell Stehr that was effective on February 1, 2004 and expires on January 31,
2006 and provides for her to receive a base salary of $240,000 for the first
year and $245,000 for the last year of the agreement for performance on a full
time basis. Ms. Sorell Stehr is also eligible for a bonus pursuant to the
Company's executive bonus program and to customary benefits, including
participation in management incentive and benefit plans, reimbursement for
automobile expenses, reasonable travel and entertainment expenses and a life
insurance policy. The agreement provides that Ms. Sorell Stehr will receive an
amount equal to $100 less than three times her annual compensation, plus
accelerated vesting or payment of deferred compensation, options, stock
appreciation rights or any other benefits payable to Ms. Sorell Stehr in the
event that within twelve months of a "Change in Control", Ms. Sorell Stehr is
terminated by the Company without "Cause" or Ms. Sorell Stehr terminates her
agreement for "Good Reason", as such terms are defined in her employment
agreement.

Richard Danderline, who served as the Executive Vice President, Finance
and Operations during the 11-month Current Year, effective January 1, 2005, is
employed part time as the Vice President of Finance pursuant to an agreement
with a term expiring on June 30, 2005. Under the agreement, Mr. Danderline has a
base salary at an annual rate of $225,000, which rate is pro-rated to reflect
the number of days (assuming a five-day a week) that Mr. Danderline works.

The Company has entered into an employment agreement as of April 17,
2004 with David Conn pursuant to which Mr. Conn is employed as the Company's
Executive Vice President. The employment agreement provides that Mr. Conn will
be employed by the Company for a two- year term ("Term") subject to earlier
termination as specified in the agreement. The employment agreement also
provides for Mr. Conn to receive a base annual salary of $200,000 per year for
the first year of the Term and $225,000 for the second year of the Term and
certain fringe benefits. In addition, he is eligible to participate in any
executive bonus program of the Company then in effect. In accordance with the
terms of the employment agreement, on May 28, 2004, the Company granted to Mr.
Conn options to purchase 200,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $2.54
per share (the "Options"). The Options expire on March May 28, 2014, subject to
earlier termination under certain conditions if Mr. Conn ceases to be employed
by the Company, and vesting as to 75,000 on May 28, 2004, 50,000 on May 17, 2005
and 75,000 on May 17, 2006. The employment agreement also provides for Mr. Conn
to receive certain severance payments if the Company terminates the employment
agreement other than for cause.

23


The Company has entered into an employment agreement effective March 9,
2005 with Warren Clamen pursuant to which Mr. Clamen is employed as the
Company's Chief Financial Officer. The employment agreement provides that Mr.
Clamen will be employed by the Company for a two-year term ("Employment Term")
subject to earlier termination as specified in the agreement. The employment
agreement also provides for Mr. Clamen to receive a base annual salary of
$225,000 per year for the first year of the Employment Term and no less than
$240,000 for the second year of the Employment Term and certain fringe benefits.
In addition, he is eligible to participate in any executive bonus program of the
Company then in effect. In accordance with the terms of the employment
agreement, on March 9, 2005 the Company granted to Mr. Clamen options to
purchase 200,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $5.06 per share (the
"Options"). The Options expire on March 9, 2015, subject to earlier termination
under certain conditions if Mr. Clamen ceases to be employed by the Company, and
vest immediately as to 100,000 of the Options and on June 1, 2005 as to the
remaining 100,000 of the Options. The employment agreement also provides for Mr.
Clamen to receive certain severance payments if the Company terminates the
employment agreement other than for cause.

Compensation of Directors

During the 11-month Current Year, Messrs. Emanuel, Mendelow, Caruso and
Cohen (each an "Outside Director") each received a grant of Common Stock from
the Company under the Company's Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan
having a value of $20,000 in compensation for attending board meetings.

Each Outside Director also received $1,000 for each Committee meeting
that he or she attended. In addition the chair of each of the Company's Audit
and Nominating/Governance Committees received a fee of $5,000 per year.

Under the Company's 2002 Stock Option Plan (the "2002 Plan"), 2001
Stock Option Plan (the "2001 Plan"), 2000 Stock Option Plan (the "2000 Plan")
and 1997 Stock Option Plan (the "1997 Plan"), non-employee directors are
eligible to be granted non-qualified stock options.

The Company's Board of Directors, or the Stock Option Committee of the
2002 Plan, 2001 Plan, 2000 Plan or the 1997 Plan, if one is appointed, has
discretion to determine the number of shares subject to each non-qualified
option (subject to the number of shares available for grant under the 2002 Plan,
2001 Plan ,2000 Plan or the 1997 Plan, as applicable), the exercise price
thereof (provided such price is not less than the par value of the underlying
shares of the Company's Common Stock under the 2000 Plan or not less than the
fair value of Common Stock under the 1997 Plan, 2001 Plan and 2002 Plan), the
term thereof (but not in excess of 10 years from the date of grant, subject to
earlier termination in certain circumstances), and the manner in which the
option becomes exercisable (amounts, intervals and other conditions). During the
11-month Current Year, Groveman and Cohen received a grant of 60,000 shares of
options each with an exercise price of $2.06 per share under 2001 Plan. D'Loren
received a grant of 100,000 shares of options with an exercise price of $2.67
per share under 1997 Plan. He also received a grant of 50,000 shares relating to
the acquisition of the Purchased Assets.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth certain information as of March 29,
2005, based on information obtained from the persons named below, with respect
to the beneficial ownership of shares of the Company's Common Stock by (i) each
person known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the
outstanding shares of the Company's Common Stock; (ii) each of the Named
Persons; (iii) each of the Company's directors; and (iv) all executive officers
and directors as a group:

Amount and Nature of Percentage of
Name and Address of Beneficial Beneficial
Beneficial Owner (1) Ownership (2) Ownership
- -------------------- ------------- ---------

Neil Cole 4,562,075( 3 ) 14.2%
Claudio Trust dated February 2, 1990 2,381,737( 4 ) 8.4%
PO Box 11360
Jackson, Wyoming 83002
Michael Caruso 2,391,628( 5 ) 8.4%
Barry Emanuel 395,896( 6 ) 1.4%
Steven Mendelow 344,271( 7 ) 1.2%
Deborah Sorell Stehr 160,000( 8 ) *
David Conn 125,000( 9 ) *
Warren Clamen 100,000(10) *
Robert D'Loren 134,391(11) *
Michael Groveman 45,643(12) *
Drew Cohen 45,643(13) *
Sweet Sportswear, LLC 2,750,000(14) 9.7%
Hubert Guez 2,751,757(14) 9.7%
5804 E. Slauson Ave
Commerce, CA 90040
Remey W. Trafelet 2,748,800(15) 9.7%
Trafelet & Company, LLC
900 Third Avenue
5th Floor
New York, NY 10022

All executive officers and directors
as a group (ten persons) 8,324,797 (3) (5) (6) (7) 25.0%
(8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13)

* Less than 1%

24


(1) Unless otherwise indicated, each beneficial owner has an address c/o the
Company at 215 West 40th Street, New York, New York 10018.

(2) A person is deemed to have beneficial ownership of securities that can be
acquired by such person within 60 days of March 29, 2005, upon exercise of
warrants or options. Consequently, each beneficial owner's percentage
ownership is determined by assuming that warrants or options held by such
person (but not those held by any other person) and which are exercisable
within 60 days from March 29, 2005, have been exercised. Unless otherwise
noted, the Company believes that all persons referred to in the table have
sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock
reflected as beneficially owned by them.

(3) Includes 3,685,875 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of
options, 786,200 shares of Common Stock owned by Mr. Neil Cole, and 20,000
shares of Common Stock owned by Mr. Cole's children. Also includes 70,000
shares of Common Stock owned by Mr. Cole's former wife over which Mr. Cole
has certain voting rights but no rights to dispose of or pecuniary
interest. Does not 15,194 shares held in Mr. Cole's account under the
Company's 401(k) savings plan for which Mr. Cole has no current voting or
dispositive powers. Does not give effect to voting rights that may be held
by Mr. Cole pursuant to the proxy described in greater detail in footnote
(14) below.

(4) Represents shares held by Claudio Trust dated February 2, 1990, of which
Mr. Caruso is the trustee.

(5) Represents shares held by Claudio Trust dated February 2, 1990, of which
Mr. Caruso is the trustee and includes 9,891 shares of Common Stock owned
by Michael Caruso.

(6) Includes 347,500 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options
and 48,396 shares of Common Stock owned by Mr. Emanuel.

(7) Includes 255,375 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options,
48,396 shares of Common Stock owned by Mr. Mendelow, and 60,750 shares of
Common Stock owned by C&P Associates, of which Mr. Mendelow and his wife
are affiliated.

(8) Represents shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options. Does
not include 9,985 shares held in Ms. Sorell Stehr's account under the
Company's 401(k) savings plan for which Ms. Sorell Stehr has no current
voting or dispositive powers.

(9) Represents shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options.

(10) Represents shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options.

(11) Represents 90,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options
and 44,391 shares of Common Stock owned by Robert D'Loren.

(12) Represents 40,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options
and 5,643 shares of Common Stock owned by Michael Groveman.

(13) Represents 40,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options
and 5,643 shares of Common Stock owned by Drew Cohen.

(14) Represents 2,750,000 shares of Common Stock held by Sweet Sportswear, LLC.
Mr. Guez, a former member of the Company's Board of Directors, is a
managing member of Sweet Sportswear, LLC and a co-trustee of a trust which
has a 50% membership interest in Sweet (the "Trust"). Sweet has granted an
irrevocable proxy with respect to all 2,750,000 shares in favor of Messrs.
Cole, Guez and/or such other members of the Company's Board designated from
time to time by a majority of the Board, to vote at any meeting of the
Company's stockholders or provide consent in lieu of a meeting, as the case
may be, but only in favor of a matter approved by the Board or otherwise at
the direction of the Board. The proxy expires on April 23, 2012 provided,
however, that the proxy will expire earlier with respect to any shares up
to an aggregate of 2 million shares subject to the proxy, to the extent
such shares are transferred by Sweet after April 23, 2003 to persons other
than (i) an officer or member of Sweet, (ii) any affiliate of Sweet or its
officer or member or (iii) any family member of such persons (collectively
referred to as "Restricted Transferee"). Moreover, the proxy will expire
with respect to any of the other 1 million shares subject to the proxy, to
the extent that such shares are transferred by Sweet after April 23, 2004
to a transferee that is not a Restricted Transferee. Mr. Guez's beneficial
ownership also includes 1,757 shares owned by the Trust.

(15) Represents 2,748,800 shares of Common Stock held by Trafelet & Company LLC,
of which Remey W. Trafelet is a managing member.


Equity Compensation Plans

The following table provides certain information with respect to all of
the Company's equity compensation plans in effect as of December 31, 2004.

25





Number of securities remaining
Number of securities to be Weighted-average available for issuance under
issued upon exercise of exercise price of equity compensation plans
outstanding options, warrants outstanding options, (excluding securities reflected
and rights warrants and rights in column (a))
---------- ------------------- ---------------
Plan Category (a) (b) (c)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Equity compensation plans
Approved by security holders: 4,013,625 $2.58 1,970,476

Equity compensation plans not
Approved by security holders (1): 1,454,000(1) $2.40 195,000(2)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 5,467,625 $2.53 2,165,476
===========================================================================================================================


(1) Represents the aggregate number of shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of individual arrangements with option and warrant holders,
including 1,420,000 issued under the terms of the Company's 2001 Stock
Option Plan. These options and warrants are up to three years in
duration, expire at various dates between January 14, 2005 and December
22, 2013, contain anti-dilution provisions providing for adjustments of
the exercise price under certain circumstances and have termination
provisions similar to options granted under stockholder approved plans.
See Notes 1 and 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a
description of the Company's Stock Option Plans.
(2) Represents shares eligible for issuance upon the exercise of options
that may be granted under the Company's 2001 Stock Option Plan.


Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
On May 1, 2003, the Company granted KCP, Inc. the exclusive worldwide
license to design, manufacture, sell, distribute and market footwear under the
BONGO brand. The CEO and Chairman of KCP, Inc. is Kenneth Cole, who is the
brother of Neil Cole, the CEO and President of the Company. During the 11 -
month Current Year, the Company received $1.1 million in royalties from KCP.

During Fiscal 2002, Neil Cole, Chairman of the Board, President and CEO
of Candie's, Inc. founded The Candie's Foundation ("the Foundation"), a
charitable foundation whose purpose is to raise national awareness concerning
the consequences of teenage pregnancy. At December 31, 2004, the Company had a
balance of $227,000 due from the Foundation, net of a $50,000 reserve. The
Company believes that the amount due will be recovered in full although the
Foundation's operating history in fund raising activities is limited. Mr. Cole's
wife, Liz Cole is employed by the Foundation at an annual rate of $80,000 per
year.

Prior to August 5, 2004, Unzipped was managed by Sweet pursuant to a
Management Agreement. Unzipped also had a supply agreement with Azteca and a
distribution agreement with ADS. All of these entities are owned or controlled
by Hubert Guez.

Pursuant to the Management Agreement, Sweet was obligated to manage the
operations of Unzipped in return for, commencing in Fiscal 2004, a management
fee based upon certain specified percentages of net income that Unzipped would
achieve during the three-year term. In addition, Sweet guaranteed that the net
income, as defined, of Unzipped commencing in Fiscal 2004 would be no less than
$1.7 million for each year during the term. In the event that the Guarantee is
not met, under the Management Agreement, Sweet is obligated to pay to the
Company the Shortfall Payment equal to the difference between the actual net
income of Unzipped, as defined, and the Guarantee. The Shortfall Payment can be
offset against the 8% Senior Subordinated Note due in 2012 in the original
amount of $ 11 million at the option of either Sweet or the Company.

With respect to the 11-month Current Year, Unzipped had a net loss (as
defined, for the purpose of determining if the Guarantee had been met) of $6.4
million, as compared to net income (as defined, for the purpose of determining
if the Guarantee had been met) in Fiscal 2004 of $74,000. Consequently for the
11-month Current Year there was a Shortfall Payment of $7.6 million, as compared
to a Shortfall Payment of $1.6 million in Fiscal 2004. These payments have been
recorded in the consolidated income statements as a reduction of Unzipped's cost
of sales (since the majority of Unzipped's operations are with entities under
common ownership with Sweet, including all of the purchases of inventory) and on
the balance sheet as a reduction of the Note due to Sweet based upon the right
to offset in the Management Agreement. At December 31, 2004, as a result of the
offset of the Shortfall Payments, the balance of the Note was reduced to $3.0
million. The Company believes that it is entitled to the full quarterly
Guarantee of $425,000 for each of the third and fourth quarters under the
Management Agreement, however, for financial statement purposes, the Company has
pro-rated the $425,000 third quarter Guarantee to the termination date, and the
$283,000 two-month fourth quarter Guarantee, pending the outcome of its
litigation with Sweet and its affiliates. See Note 8. After adjusting for the
Shortfall Payments, Unzipped's reported net income for 11-month Current Year and
Fiscal 2004 was $461,000 and $1.4 million, respectively.

Prior to August 5, 2004, there was a distribution agreement between
Unzipped and ADS pursuant to which Unzipped paid ADS a per unit fee for
warehousing and distribution functions and per unit fee for processing and


26


invoicing orders. The agreement also provided for reimbursement for certain
operating costs incurred by ADS and charges for special handling fees at hourly
rates approved by management. Prior to August 5, 2004, there was also a supply
agreement in effect between Unzipped and Azteca pursuant to which Unzipped paid
Azteca cost plus 6% for goods, and was entitled to up to 30 days in which to pay
Azteca.

Prior to August 5, 2004, Azteca allocated expenses to Unzipped for
Unzipped's use of a portion of Azteca's office space, design and production team
and support personnel. Unzipped also occupied office space in a building rented
by ADS and Commerce Clothing Company, LLC (Commerce), a related party to Azteca.

On August 5, 2004, Unzipped terminated the Management Agreement with
Sweet, the supply agreement with Azteca and the distribution agreement with ADS
and commenced a lawsuit against Sweet, Azteca, ADS and Hubert Guez. See Note 8
of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The related party transactions, most of which are being disputed in the
litigation as further described in Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements, are summarized as follows:

11-month
Current Year Fiscal 2004
------------ -----------
Products purchased from Azteca $ 22,886 $50,907
Allocated office space, design and production team
and support personnel expense from Azteca 118 452
Management fee - -
Shortfall payment per Management Agreement 7,566 1,626
Interest expense paid on Azteca subordinated debt - -
Expenses of distribution services per distribution
agreement with ADS 2,405 3,262

See Notes 2 and 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

At December 31, 2004, the Company included in accounts payable and
accrued expenses due to Azteca and ADS $847,000 and $2.3 million respectively.
These amounts, however, are in dispute in the litigation. See Note 8 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.

In a separate transaction concerning Unzipped with a related party, the
amount to due to BAI at December 31, 2004 was $2.5 million. BAI is the licensee
under the Jeans Wear License and managed the operations of Unzipped following
the termination of Sweet as the manager on August 5, 2004.

The Company was advised in acquisition of the Purchased Assets by UCC
Funding Corporation ("UCC"), of which Robert D'Loren, a director of the Company,
is President. In connection with the services provided in the acquisition, Mr.
D'Loren, the sole shareholder of UCC, received 50,000 stock options. In
addition, UCC will receive a fee of 5% of the gross revenues that the Company
derives from the BADGLEY MISCHKA trademark and all derivative trademarks, which
right was assigned to Content Holding, which is owned by Mr. D'Loren. In
addition, should the Company sell all or substantially all of the acquired
assets, UCC will receive a cash payment calculated under a formula based on the
sales price

The Company has a license for BONGO branded bags and small leather/PVC
goods which commenced in Fiscal 2002 with Innovo Group, Inc. ("Innovo"), a
company controlled by Hubert Guez, a former director of the Company and
principal of Sweet, manager of Unzipped. Under this license, which was
terminated in December 2004, the Company recorded $136,000, $126,000 and
$214,000 in royalty income in the 11-month Current Year, Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal
2003, respectively, and royalties receivable from Innovo were $4,000, $6,000 and
$179,000 at December 31, 2004, January 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services


Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed by BDO Seidman, LLP for professional
services rendered for the audit of the Company's annual financial statements for
the 11-month Current Year and Fiscal 2004 and the review of the financial
statements included in the Company's Forms 10-Q for the 11-month Current Year
and Fiscal 2004 totaled $168,700, and $318,500, respectively.


Audit-Related Fees. There were $30,000 and $13,000 aggregate fees billed by BDO
Seidman, LLP for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to
the performance of the audit or review of the Company's financial statements for
the 11-month Current Year and Fiscal 2004, respectively, and that are not
disclosed in the paragraph captions "Audit Fees" above. The majority of the
audit-related fees in Fiscal 2004 were related to the audit of the financial
statements of IP Holdings and Candie's Foundation. In Fiscal 2003, the majority
of these fees were related to Unzipped acquisition and SEC investigation (see
"Item 3 - Legal Proceedings").


Tax Fees. The aggregate fees billed by BDO Seidman, LLP for professional
services rendered for tax compliance, for the 11-month Current Year and Fiscal
2004, were $64,000, and $69,500, respectively. The aggregate fees billed by BDO
Seidman, LLP for professional services rendered for tax advice and tax planning,
for the 11-month Current Year and Fiscal 2004, were $2,090 and $17,100,
respectively.


All Other Fees. There were no fees billed by BDO Seidman, LLP for products and
services, other than the services described in the paragraphs captions "Audit
Fees", "Audit-Related Fees", and "Tax Fees" above for the 11-month Current Year
and Fiscal 2004.



27


The Audit Committee has established its pre-approval policies and procedures,
pursuant to which the Audit Committee approved the foregoing audit services
provided by BDO Seidman, LLP in Fiscal 2004. Consistent with the Audit
Committee's responsibility for engaging the Company's independent auditors, all
audit and permitted non-audit services require pre-approval by the Audit
Committee. The full Audit Committee approves proposed services and fee estimates
for these services. The Audit Committee chairperson or their designee has been
designated by the Audit Committee to approve any services arising during the
year that were not pre-approved by the Audit Committee. Services approved by the
Audit Committee chairperson are communicated to the full Audit Committee at its
next regular meeting and the Audit Committee reviews services and fees for the
fiscal year at each such meeting. Pursuant to these procedures, the Audit
Committee approved all the foregoing audit services and permissible non-audit
services provided by BDO Seidman, LLP.




PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) Documents included as part of this Annual Report.


1. The following consolidated financial statements are included in this
Annual Report

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 2004, and January 31, 2003

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the 11-months ended December 31,
2004 and the Years ended January 31, 2004 and 2003

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the 11-months ended
December 31, 2004 and the Years ended January 31, 2004 and 2003

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the 11-months ended December 31,
2004 and the Years ended January 31, 2004 and 2003 Notes to

Consolidated Financial Statements

2. The following financial statement schedules are included in this Annual
Report.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Financial
Statement

Schedule for the 11-months ended December 31, 2004 and the Years ended
January 31, 2004 and 2003

Schedule II Valuation and qualifying accounts

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable
accounting regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not
required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore
have been omitted.

3. See the Index to Exhibits on Page 34 for a list of exhibits filed as
part of this report.

(b) See Item (a)3 above.

(c) See Item (a)2 above.


28


Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

CANDIE'S, INC.


By: /s/ Neil Cole
-----------------------
Neil Cole
Chief Executive Officer


Dated: March 31, 2005

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:



Signature and Name Capacity in Which Signed Date


/s/ Neil Cole Chairman of the Board, President and March 31, 2005
- -------------
Neil Cole Chief Executive Officer

/s/Richard Danderline Executive Vice President - Finance and Operations March 31, 2005
- ---------------------
Richard Danderline (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
during the reporting period)

/s/ Barry Emanuel Director March 31, 2005
- ------------------
Barry Emanuel

/s/ Steven Mendelow Director March 31, 2005
- -------------------
Steven Mendelow

/s/Robert D'Loren Director March 31, 2005
- ------------------
Robert D'Loren

/s/Michael Caruso Director March 31, 2005
- -----------------
Michael Caruso

/s/Michael Groveman Director March 31, 2005
- -------------------
Michael Groveman

/s/Drew Cohen Director March 31, 2005
- -------------
Drew Cohen







29




Index to Exhibits

Exhibit



Numbers Description


3.1 Certificate of Incorporation, as amended through October 1994 (1) (3)
3.2 Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation filed November 1994 (2)
3.3 Amendments to Certificate of Incorporation filed in August 1998 and February 2000 (8)
3.4 Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation dated June 24, 2002 (14)
3.5 Restated and Amended By-Laws (8)
10.1 Trademark Purchase Agreement between the Company and New Retail Concepts, Inc. (3)
10.2 1989 Stock Option Plan of the Company (1)(*)
10.3 1997 Stock Option Plan of the Company (4) (*)
10.4 Candie's, Inc. 401(K) Savings Plan (15)
10.5 Option Agreement of Neil Cole dated November 29, 1999 (15) (*)
10.6 Employment Agreement between Richard Danderline and the Company dated as of January 27, 2005 (5)(*)
10.7 Employment Agreement between Warren Clamen and the Company. (10)(*)
10.8 Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement of Unzipped Apparel LLC (6)
10.9 2000 Stock Option Plan of the Company (9) (*)
10.10 Rights Agreement dated January 26, 2000 between the Company and
Continental Stock Transfer and Trust Company (7)
10.11 Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan (12)
10.12 Employment Agreement between Deborah Sorell Stehr and the Company dated February 1, 2004 (11)*
10.13 2001 Stock Option Plan of the Company (18)*
10.14 2002 Stock Option Plan of the Company (13)*
10.15 Equity Acquisition Agreement between Michael Caruso & Co., Inc., Candie's, Inc. and Sweet Sportswear,
LLC dated as of April 23, 2002. (14)
10.16 8% Senior Subordinated Note due 2012 of Candie's, Inc. payable to Sweet Sportswear, LLC. (14)
10.17 Collateral Pledge Agreement dated October 18, 2002 between Candie's, Inc., Michael Caruso & Co., and
Sweet Sportswear LLC. (14)
10.18 Employment Agreement between the Company and David Conn (16)(*)
10.19 Agreement for Sale of Unzipped Interest to TKO Apparel, Inc. (16)
10.20 Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and certain designees of TKO Apparel, Inc. (16)
10.21 Asset Purchase Agreement dated October 20, 2004 by and among B.E.M. Enterprise, Ltd., Escada (USA) Inc.,
the Company and Badgley Mischa Licensing LLC (17)
10.22 Letter Agreement dated October 29, 2004 among UCC Funding Corporation, Content Holdings,
Inc., the Company and Badgley Mischa Licensing LLC (17)
10.23 Form of Option Agreement under the Company's 1997 Stock Option Plan (19)(*)
10.24 Form of Option Agreement under the Company's 2000 Stock Option Plan (19) (*)
10.25 Form of Option Agreement under the Company's 2001 Stock Option Plan (19)(*)
10.26 Form of Option Agreement under the Company's 2002 Stock Option Plan. (19)(*)
10.27 Employment Agreement between Neil Cole and the Company dated March 29, 2005 (19)(*)
10.28 Option Agreement of Neil Cole dated March 29, 2005 (19)(*)
21 Subsidiaries of the Company. (19)
23 Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP. (19)
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant To Rule 13a-14 Or 15d-14 Of The Securities Exchange
Act Of 1934, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 302 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002. (19)
31.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant To Rule 13a-14 Or 15d-14 Of The Securities
Exchange Act Of 1934, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 302 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002.. (19)
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 (19)


30


32.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant
To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 (19)

- ---------------
(1) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form
S-18 (File 33-32277-NY) and incorporated by reference herein.
(2) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
for the year ended January 31, 1995, and incorporated by reference
herein.
(3) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (File 33-53878) and incorporated by reference herein.
(4) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended October 31, 1997, and incorporated by reference
herein.
(5) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated January 27, 2005 and
incorporated by reference herein.
(6) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended October 31, 1998 and incorporated by reference
herein.
(7) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 26, 2000 and incorporated
by reference herein.
(8) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report as Form 10-K for the
year ended January 31, 2000, and incorporated by reference herein.
(9) Filed as Exhibit A to the Company's definitive Proxy Statement dated July 18, 2000 as filed on Schedule
14A and incorporated by reference herein.
(10) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K for the event dated March 9, 2005 and
incorporated by reference herein.
(11) Filed as an exhibit to the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2004 and
incorporated by reference herein.
(12) Filed as Appendix B to the Company's definitive Proxy Statement dated July 2, 2001 as filed on Schedule
14A and incorporated by reference herein.
(13) Filed as Exhibit B to the Company's definitive proxy statement dated May 28, 2002 as filed on Schedule
14A and incorporated by reference herein.
(14) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended October 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by
reference.
(15) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2003 and
incorporated by reference herein.
(16) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2004
and incorporated herein by reference.
(17) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended October 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by
reference.
(18) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2002 and
incorporated by reference therein.
(19) Filed herewith.

* Denotes management compensation plan or arrangement.





31








Annual Report on Form 10-K

Item 8, 15(a)(1) and (2), (c) and (d)

List of Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule

11-Months ended December 31, 2004

Candie's, Inc. and Subsidiaries






F - 1




Candie's, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Form 10-K

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule







The following consolidated financial statements of Candie's Inc. and subsidiaries are included in Item 15:


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm...................................... F-3

Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 2004, and January 31, 2003........................ F-4

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the 11-months ended December 31, 2004 and
the Years ended January 31, 2004 and 2003................................................... F-5

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
for the 11-months ended December 31, 2004 and the Years ended January 31, 2004 and 2003. F-6

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the 11-months ended December 31, 2004 and
the Years ended January 31, 2004 and 2003 ............................................... F-7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................................................... F-8




The following consolidated financial statement schedule of Candie's, Inc. and
subsidiaries is included in Item 15(d):


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Financial Statement
Schedule for the 11-months ended December 31, 2004 and the Years ended
January 31, 2004 and 2003................................................................ S-1

Schedule II Valuation and qualifying accounts ............................................... S-2




All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting
regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the
related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.




F - 2






Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Stockholders and Directors of
Candie's, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Candie's, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and January 31, 2004, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
the 11 months ended December 31, 2004 and each of the two years in the period
ended January 31, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over
financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion

In our opinion, consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Candie's, Inc. and
subsidiaries at December 31, 2004 and January 31, 2004, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for the 11-months ended December 31, 2004 and
each of the two years in the period ended January 31, 2004, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 1, effective February 1, 2002, the Company adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets."


/s/: BDO Seidman, LLP
BDO Seidman, LLP




New York, New York
March 18, 2005



F - 3






Candie's, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except par value)


December 31 January 31,
---------------------------
2004 2004
--------- ---------

Assets
Current Assets:
Cash...................................................... $ 798 $ 2,794
Accounts receivable....................................... 2,239 3,388
Due from factor, net of allowances of
$1,856 and $1,271 respectively....................... 3,865 8,953
Due from affiliates....................................... 227 174
Inventories, net.......................................... 279 7,439
Deferred income taxes..................................... 1,549 1,549
Prepaid advertising and other............................. 670 1,358
--------- ---------
Total Current Assets.............................................. 9,627 25,655
--------- ---------
Property and equipment, at cost:
Furniture, fixtures and equipment......................... 1,638 2,670
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization........... 1,292 2,118
--------- ---------
346 552
--------- ---------
Other Assets:
Restricted cash........................................... 2,900 2,900
Goodwill.................................................. 25,241 25,241
Other intangibles, net.................................... 16,591 16,317
Deferred financing costs, net............................. 2,149 2,042
Deferred income taxes..................................... 2,073 2,073
Other..................................................... 1,233 65
--------- ---------
50,187 48,638
--------- ---------
Total Assets...................................................... $ 60,160 $ 74,845
========= =========
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Revolving notes payable - banks............................... $ - $12,775
Accounts payable and accrued expenses......................... 9,728 10,430
Deferred revenue.............................................. 1,413 2,318
Due to related party.......................................... 2,465 2,342
Current portion of long-term debt............................ 2,563 2,354
--------- ---------
Total current liabilities......................................... 16,169 30,219
--------- ---------

Deferred revenue.................................................. 366 738
Long-term debt, less current maturities........................... 19,367 25,020

Stockholders' Equity:
Common stock, $.001 par value - shares authorized 75,000;
shares issued 28,293 and 25,915 respectively......... 29 26
Additional paid-in capital.................................... 76,154 71,008
Retained earnings (deficit)................................... (51,258) (51,499)
Less: Treasury stock - 198 shares at cost.................. (667) (667)
--------- ---------
Total stockholders' equity................................... 24,258 18,868
--------- ---------
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity........................ $ 60,160 $ 74,845
========= =========


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



F - 4




Candie's, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except earnings per share data)




11 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
------------------- ----------------------------
December 31 January 31,
----------------------------
2004 2004 2003
-------------------- ----------------------------

Net sales $ 60,409 $ 124,803 $151,643
Licensing income 8,571 6,574 5,140
-------------------------------------------------
Net revenue 68,980 131,377 156,783
Cost of goods sold (net of recoveries pursuant to an agreement of
$7,566, $1,626 and $0 respectively - See Note 2) 48,229 102,604 116,306
-------------------------------------------------
Gross profit 20,751 28,773 40,477

Selling, general and administrative expenses 17,720 32,308 37,872
Special charges 295 4,629 3,566
-------------------------------------------------

Operating income (loss) 2,736 (8,164) (961)

Other expenses:
Interest expense 2,495 3,118 3,373
Equity income in joint venture - - (250)
-------------------------------------------------
2,495 3,118 3,123
-------------------------------------------------

Income (loss) before income taxes 241 (11,282) (4,084)

Provision (benefit) for income taxes - 58 (139)
-------------------------------------------------

Net income (loss) $ 241 $ (11,340) $ (3,945)
=================================================



Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic $ 0.01 $ (0.45) $ (0.17)
=================================================

Diluted $ 0.01 $ (0.45) $ (0.17)
=================================================


Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic 26,851 25,181 23,681
=================================================

Diluted 28,706 25,181 23,681
=================================================





See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



F - 5



Candie's, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
(in thousands)



Preferred
& Common Additional Retained
Common Stock Stock to be Paid - In Earnings Treasury
Shares Amount Issued Capital (Deficit) Stock Total
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Balance at February 1, 2002 20,400 $ 20 $ 2,000 $ 58,188 $ (36,214) $ (475) $ 23,519
Issuance of common stock to benefit plan 35 - - 54 - - 54
Exercise of stock options 849 1 - 1,150 - - 1,151
Issuance of common stock to directors 34 - - 90 - - 90
Acquisition of Unzipped Apparel, LLC 3,000 3 - 8,247 - - 8,250
Issuance of common stock to shareholders in
connection with class action litigation 674 1 (2,000) 1,999 - - -
Options granted to non-employees - - - 84 - - 84
Purchase of treasury shares - - - - - (192) (192)
Net loss - - - - (3,945) - (3,945)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at January 31, 2003 24,992 25 - 69,812 (40,159) (667) 29,011
Issuance of common stock to benefit plan 20 - - 22 - - 22
Exercise of stock options 851 1 - 1,022 - - 1,023
Re-grant of stock options - - - 93 - - 93
Issuance of common stock to directors 52 - - 59 - - 59
Net loss - - - - (11,340) - (11,340)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at January 31, 2004 25,915 26 - 71,008 (51,499) (667) 18,868
Issuance of common stock to designees of
TKO Apparel, Inc. 1,000 1 - 2,184 - - 2,185
Issuance of common stock to B.E.M
Enterprises, Ltd for asset acquisition 215 1 - 949 - - 950
Issuance of stock options to a non-employee
related to the above asset acquisition - - - 133 - - 133
Issuance of common stock to a non-employee 10 - - 25 - - 25
Exercise of stock options 1,109 1 - 1,745 - - 1,746
Issuance of common stock to directors 44 - - 110 - - 110
Net income - - - - 241 - 241
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 2004 28,293 $ 29$ - $ 76,154 $ (51,258) $ (667) $ 24,258
=================================================================================



See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



F - 6



Candie's, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)



11 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
December 31, January 31,
2004 2004 2003
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash flows (used in) provided by operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 241 $ (11,340) $ (3,945)
Items in net income not affecting cash:
Depreciation of property and equipment 236 863 1,629
Amortization of intangibles 1,901 1,873 1,686
Bad debt expense 792 -
Issuance of common stock to non-employee directors 110 59 90
Stock option compensation non - employees 25 - 84
Reserve on affiliate receivable (53) - -
Equity (income) loss in Joint Venture - - (250)
Reduction of settlement payment (238) - -
Write-off of impaired assets - 1,567 2,761
Shortfall Payment against Guarantee (7,566) (1,626) -
Shortfall Payment reserve 685 - -
Accrued interest on long-term debt 500 - -
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of business acquisition:
Accounts receivable 1,046 4,388 (2519)
Due from affiliate 103 (56) (335)
Factored accounts receivables and payable to factor, net 5,088 9,013 (5,038)
Inventories 7,160 11,577 (5,163)
Prepaid advertising and other 688 (246) (327)
Refundable and prepaid taxes - 29 (35)
Other assets (1,168) 115 212
Deferred revenue (1,277) 3,056 -
Due to related parties (2,342) (3,861) 6,203
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (702) (5,040) (4,920)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 4,437 11,163 (9,867)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash flows used in investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment (30) (248) (1,729)
Purchase of trademarks (19) - (450)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash used in investing activities (49) (248) (2,179)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities:
Revolving notes payable - bank (12,775) (8,802) (1,301)
Proceeds from long -term debt 3,600 - 20,000
Proceeds of loans from related parties 2,465 - -
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants 1,745 1,023 1,151
Payment of long-term debt (2,628) (2,153) (1,710)
Proceeds from common stock issuance 2,184 - -
Prepaid interest expense - long-term (500) - -
Purchase of treasury stock - - (192)
Restricted cash - - (2,900)
Deferred financing costs (475) (88) (1,739)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities (6,384) (10,020) 13,309
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (1,996) 895 1,263
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 2,794 1,899 636
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 798 $ 2,794 $ 1,899
===========================================================================================================================

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Cash paid during the year:
Interest $ 2,636 $ 2,412 $ 2,400
=================================================
Income tax benefits $ - $ - $ (139)
=================================================
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Issuance of common stock to benefit plan $ - $ 22 $ 54
=================================================
Non-cash acquisition of Unzipped (stock and debt) $ - $ - $ 19,250
=================================================
Non-cash acquisition of BADGLEY MISCHKA $ 1,083 $ - $ -
=================================================
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



F - 7



Candie's, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Information as of and for the Years Ended January 31, 2004 and 2003
(dollars are in thousands, except per share data)

The Company

Candie's, Inc. (the "Company"), which was incorporated in Delaware in 1978, is
in the business of licensing and marketing intellectual property. The Company
currently owns three brands, CANDIE'S(R), BONGO(R) and BADGLEY MISCHKA(R), which
it licenses to third parties for use in connection with a variety of apparel,
footwear, and fashion products. The Company also arranges through its
wholly-owned subsidiary Bright Star Footwear, Inc. ("Bright Star") for the
manufacture of footwear products for mass market and discount retailers under
the private label brand of the retailer.

The Company's business strategy, as a licensing and marketing company, is to
maximize the value of its intellectual property by entering into strategic
licenses with partners who have been selected based upon the Company's belief
that they will be able to produce and sell quality products in the categories of
their specific expertise. This licensing strategy is designed to permit the
Company to operate its licensing business with minimal working capital, no
inventory, production or distribution costs or risks, and utilizing only a small
group of core employees.

On December 7, 2004, the Company announced that beginning January 1, 2005, it
had changed its fiscal year ending on January 31, to a calendar year beginning
on January 1st and ending on December 31st. The change was designed to align the
Company's financial reporting with that of its licensees. As a result, the
current period will be reported as an 11- month period ending on December 31,
2004 ("11-month Current Year").

In connection with the acquisition of Unzipped in April 2002, the Company began
reporting a second operating segment (apparel). See Note 13.


1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Fiscal Year End

In December, 2004, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a change in
the Company's fiscal year end from January 31 to December 31, effective for the
period ending December 31, 2004. As a result, the 11-month Current Year will be
reported as an eleven month period. For comparative purposes, unaudited
condensed results of operations data for the period for the 11 month period
ended December 31, 2003 is presented in Note 15.

Principles of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and
its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and
items have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company's 50% equity interest
in Unzipped was accounted for under the equity method prior to the acquisition
of the remaining interest in April 2002. See Note 2.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. The Company reviews all significant estimates affecting the
financial statements on a recurring basis and records the effect of any
adjustments when necessary.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Concentration of credit risk is limited due to the large number of customers to
which the Company sells its products and the use of a factor to assign invoices
for sales to its customers. For the 11-month Current Year and 12 month ended
January 31, 2004 ("Fiscal 2004"), one customer accounted for 27.7% and 16.8%,
respectively, of the Company's total net sales. No customers exceeded 10% in 12
months ended January 31, 2003 ("Fiscal 2003").

Inventories

Inventories, which consist entirely of finished goods, are stated at the lower
of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined by the first-in, first-out
("FIFO") method. Inventory reserves are determined by marking down inventory to
the lower of cost or market value, based on existing and subsequent sales
orders, and where no such orders exist, management's estimate of future market
conditions.

F - 8


Deferred Financing Costs

The Company incurred costs (primarily professional fees and placement agent
fees) in connection with the 11-month Current Year and Fiscal 2003 bond
financing. These costs have been deferred and are being amortized over the life
of the debt (7 years).

Property, Equipment and Depreciation

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Depreciation and amortization are determined by the straight line
and accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets
ranging from three to seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized by the
straight-line method over the initial term of the related lease or estimated
useful life, whichever is less.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

When circumstances mandate, the Company evaluates the recoverability of its
long-lived assets, other than goodwill, by comparing estimated future
undiscounted cash flows with the assets' carrying value to determine whether a
write-down to market value, based on discounted cash flow, is necessary. During
Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003, the Company wrote off computer software and
leasehold improvements in connection with the closing of retail stores of $1.6
million and $2.8 million, respectively. See Note 4.

Goodwill and Other Intangibles

In June 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
142 (SFAS No. 142), "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," which changes the
accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets without determinable lives
from an amortization method to an impairment-only approach. Other intangibles
with determinable lives, primarily trademarks, are amortized on a straight-line
basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, approximately 20 years.

Under SFAS No. 142, beginning on February 1, 2002, amortization of goodwill
ceased and the Company annually tests goodwill for impairment.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year ended January 31,
2003, by segment and in total, are as follows:

Footwear Apparel Consolidated

Balance at February 1, 2002 $ 1,868 $ - $ 1,868
Acquisition of Unzipped (Note 2) - 23,373 23,373
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at January 31, 2003 $ 1,868 $ 23,373 $ 25,241
========= ========= =========

Goodwill was initially tested in the first quarter of Fiscal 2003 for impairment
upon adoption of SFAS No. 142 and is further tested for impairment during the
third fiscal quarter of each year. There have been no impairments to the
carrying amount of goodwill in any period.


Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized upon shipment with related risk and title passing to the
customers. Allowances for chargebacks, returns and other charges are recorded at
the sales date based on customer specific projections as well as historical
rates of such allowances.

The Company has entered into various trade name license agreements that provide
revenues based on minimum royalties and additional revenues based on a
percentage of defined sales. Minimum royalty revenue is recognized on a
straight-line basis over each period, as defined, in each license agreement.
Royalties exceeding the defined minimum amounts are recognized as income during
the period corresponding to the licensee's sales.

Significant Contracts

On December 6, 2004, a license agreement (the "Kohl's License") was entered into
by the Company, a wholly owned subsidiary IP Holdings, LLC ("IPH"), and Kohl's
Department Stores, Inc. ("Kohl's"). Pursuant to the Kohl's License, the Company
granted Kohl's the exclusive right to design, manufacture, sell and distribute a
broad range of products under the CANDIE'S(R) trademark. The initial term of the
Kohl's License expires on January 29, 2011, subject to Kohl's option to renew
the License Agreement for up to three additional terms of five years each
contingent on Kohl's meeting certain performance and minimum sale standards. The
Kohl's License also contains certain minimum royalties that Kohl's is obligated
to pay to the Company, which average between $8 and $9 million per contract year
(the first contract year ending on December 31, 2006).


F - 9


Shipping Expenses

Shipping expenses for the 11-month Current Year, Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003
amounted to $343, $324, and $326, respectively, and are included in selling,
general and administrative expenses.

Taxes on Income

The Company uses the asset and liability approach of accounting for income taxes
and provides deferred income taxes for temporary differences that will result in
taxable or deductible amounts in future years based on the reporting of certain
costs in different periods for financial statement and income tax purposes.
Valuation allowances are recorded when recoverability of the asset is not
assured.

Stock-Based Compensation

In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS
No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure"
(an amendment of SFAS No. 123), which amended SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation." The Company has elected to continue to follow the
intrinsic value method in accounting for its stock-based employee compensation
arrangements as defined by Accounting Principles Board Opinion ("APB") No. 25,
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related interpretations
including Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 44,
"Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation," an
interpretation of APB No. 25. Accordingly, the Company recognizes no
compensation expense for employee stock options granted when the exercise price
of the option is the same as or exceeds the market value of the Company's Common
Stock at the time of grant. As prescribed under SFAS No. 123, the Company has
disclosed the pro-forma effects on net income and earnings per share of
recording compensation expense for the fair value of the options granted.

Both the stock-based employee compensation included in the reported net income
and the stock-based employee compensation cost that would have been included in
the determination of net income if the fair value based method had been applied
to all awards, as well as the resulting pro forma net income and earnings per
share using the fair value approach, are presented in the following table. The
fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the weighted-average assumptions
presented in Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



11 Months ended 12 Months ended
December 31, January 31,
2004 2004 2003
---------------------------------------

Net income (loss) - as reported $241 ($11,340) ($3,945)
Add: Stock-based employee compensation
included in reported net income, net of tax - - -
Deduct: Stock-based employee compensation
determined under the fair value based
method, net of tax (1,458) (1,480) (1,077)
---------------------------------------
Pro forma net loss ($1,217) ($12,820) ($5,022)
=======================================


Basic and diluted loss per share:

As reported ($0.04) ($0.45) ($0.17)
=======================================
Pro forma ($0.05) ($0.50) ($0.21)
=======================================



Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company's financial instruments approximate fair value at December 31 and
January 31, 2004.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing
net income available (loss attributable) to common shareholders by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per
share reflect, in periods in which they have a dilutive effect, the effect of
common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options. The difference between
reported basic and diluted weighted-average common shares results from the
assumption that all dilutive stock options outstanding were exercised and all
convertible bonds have been converted into common stock. Diluted loss per share
reflects, in periods in which they have a dilutive effect, the effect of common
shares issuable upon exercise of stock options.

F - 10


Computer Software and Web-site Costs

Internal and external direct and incremental costs incurred in obtaining and
developing computer software for internal use and web-site costs are capitalized
in property and equipment and amortized, under the straight-line method, over
the estimated useful life of the software, three years. The net amounts
capitalized for these costs at December 31, 2004 and January 31, 2004 were $0
and $291, respectively.

Advertising Campaign Costs

The Company records national advertising campaign costs as an expense concurrent
with the first showing of the related advertising and other advertising costs
when incurred. Advertising expenses for the 11-month Current Year, Fiscal 2004
and Fiscal 2003 amounted to $1,782, $1,984, and $3,005, respectively.

Store Opening Costs

Store opening costs were expensed in the periods they were incurred.

New Accounting Standards

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, "Inventory Costs," which
clarifies the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight,
handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage) by requiring these items to be
recognized as current-period charges. SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory
costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005, with earlier
application permitted. The adoption of SFAS No. 151 will have no impact on our
results of operations or our future financial position or results of operations.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, "Exchanges of Monetary Assets,"
which addresses the measurement of exchanges of nonmonetary assets and
eliminates the exception from fair value measurement for nonmonetary exchanges
of similar productive assets and replaces it with an exception for exchanges
that do not have commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 is effective for nonmonetary
asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005, with
earlier application permitted. The adoption of SFAS No. 153 will have no impact
on our results of operations or our future financial position or results of
operations.


In December 2004, the FASB issued FAS No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment," an
amendment of FASB Statements 123 and 95. FAS No, 123(R) replaced FAS No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25,
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees." This statement requires companies to
recognize the fair value of stock options and other stock-based compensation to
employees beginning with fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. This
means that the Company will be required to implement FAS No, 123(R) no later
than the quarter beginning July 1,. The Company currently measures stock-based
compensation in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, as discussed above. The
impact on the company's financial condition or results of operations will depend
on the number and terms of stock options outstanding on the date of change, as
well as future options that may be granted.

Presentation of Prior Year Data

Certain reclassifications have been made to conform prior year data with the
current presentation.




F - 11




2. Unzipped Apparel, LLC ("Unzipped")

Equity Investment:

On October 7, 1998, the Company formed Unzipped with a joint venture partner
Sweet, the purpose of which was to market and distribute apparel under the
BONGO(R) label. The Company and Sweet each had a 50% interest in Unzipped.
Pursuant to the terms of the joint venture, the Company licensed the BONGO
trademark to Unzipped for use in the design, manufacture and sale of certain
designated apparel products.

Acquisition:

On April 23, 2002, the Company acquired the remaining 50% interest in Unzipped
from Sweet for three million shares of the Company's common stock and $11
million in debt evidenced by an 8% senior subordinated note due 2012 (the
"Note"). In connection with the acquisition of Unzipped, the Company filed a
registration statement with the SEC for the three million shares of the
Company's common stock issued to Sweet. The terms of this agreement provided
that in the event the registration statement was not declared effective by April
23, 2003, the Company would be required to pay penalties to Sweet. Since the
registration statement was not declared effective by the SEC until July 29,
2003, the Company was required to pay $82.5 to Sweet as a penalty. The Company
recorded $82.5 expense for such penalty in the quarter ended April 30, 2003.

The following table shows the value of assets and liabilities recorded for the
purchase of Unzipped, adjusted to reflect changes in fair value of assets and
liabilities and purchase accounting liabilities:

Accounts receivable, net $ 593
Due from factors and accounts receivable, net 7,509
Inventories 5,485
Prepaid advertising and other 61
Property and equipment 156
Other assets 11
---------
Total assets acquired 13,815

Revolving notes payable - banks 10,512
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 8,167
---------
Total liabilities assumed 18,679
---------
Net assets acquired $ (4,864)
=========

The excess purchase price over net assets acquired had originally been recorded
based on estimates, as follows: $21.8 million as goodwill and $2.4 million as
other intangible assets. In the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2003, the Company
obtained a third party valuation of certain intangible assets, resulting in a
reallocation of the purchase price of $23.4 million to goodwill and $900 to
other intangible assets. Accordingly, the Company reversed $187 of amortization
recorded in the prior two quarters of Fiscal 2003, reflecting the reduction of
intangible assets. Goodwill is not tax deductible for income tax purposes.

The following unaudited pro-forma information presents a summary of the
Company's consolidated results of operations as if the Unzipped acquisition and
its related financing had occurred on February 1, 2001. These pro forma results
have been prepared for comparative purposes only and do not purport to be
indicative of the results of operations which actually would have resulted had
the acquisition occurred on February 1, 2001, or which may result in the future.

Fiscal year ended
January 31,
2003 2002
-----------------------------
Total net revenues $169,476 $140,301
Operating income ($895) $541
Net loss ($4,600) ($1,737)
Basic and diluted loss per common share ($0.19) ($0.08)

Revolving Credit Agreement:

On February 25, 2003, Unzipped entered into a two-year $25 million credit
facility ("the Unzipped Credit Facility") with GE Capital Commercial Services,
Inc. ("GECCS" or "the Lender"). Borrowings were limited by advance rates against
eligible accounts receivable and inventory balances, as defined. Under the
facility, Unzipped could also arrange for letters of credit in an amount up to
$5 million. The borrowings bore interest at a rate of 2.25% per annum in excess
of the 30 day Commercial Paper rate or 3%, whichever is greater.



F - 12


Borrowings under the facility were secured by substantially all of the assets of
Unzipped. In addition, Unzipped had agreed to subordinate its accounts payable
to Azteca, ADS and Sweet to GECCS. Unzipped was required to meet a minimum
tangible net worth covenant, as defined. At October 31, 2004, the loan had been
repaid in full and the borrowing arrangement with GECCS was terminated.

Related Party Transactions:

Prior to August 5, 2004, Unzipped was managed by Sweet Sportswear, LLC ("Sweet")
pursuant to a management agreement (the "Management Agreement"). Unzipped also
had a supply agreement with Azteca Production International, Inc ("Azteca") and
a distribution agreement with Apparel Distribution Services, LLC ("ADS"). All of
these entities are owned or controlled by Hubert Guez.

Pursuant to the Management Agreement, Sweet was obligated to manage the
operations of Unzipped in return for, commencing in Fiscal 2004, a management
fee based upon certain specified percentages of net income that Unzipped would
achieve during the three-year term. In addition, Sweet guaranteed that the net
income, as defined, of Unzipped commencing in Fiscal 2004 would be no less than
$1.7 million for each year during the term (the "Guarantee"). In the event that
the Guarantee is not met, under the Management Agreement, Sweet is obligated to
pay to the Company the difference between the actual net income of Unzipped, as
defined, and the Guarantee (the "Shortfall Payment"). The Shortfall Payment can
be offset against the 8% Senior Subordinated Note due in 2012 in the original
amount of $ 11 million at the option of either Sweet or the Company.

With respect to the 11-month Current Year, Unzipped had a net loss (as defined,
for the purpose of determining if the Guarantee had been met) of $6.4 million,
as compared to net income (as defined, for the purpose of determining if the
Guarantee had been met) in Fiscal 2004 of $74. Consequently for the 11-month
Current Year there was a Shortfall Payment of $7.6 million, as compared to a
Shortfall Payment of $1.6 million in Fiscal 2004. These payments have been
recorded in the consolidated income statements as a reduction of Unzipped's cost
of sales (since the majority of Unzipped's operations are with entities under
common ownership with Sweet, including all of the purchases of inventory) and on
the balance sheet as a reduction of the Note due to Sweet based upon the right
to offset in the Management Agreement. At December 31, 2004, as a result of the
offset of the Shortfall Payments, the balance of the Note was reduced to $3.0
million. The Company believes that it is entitled to the full quarterly
Guarantee of $425 for each of the third and fourth quarters under the Management
Agreement, however, for financial statement purposes, the Company has pro-rated
the $425 third quarter Guarantee to the termination date, and the $283 two-month
fourth quarter Guarantee, and has established a reserve of $400 for the third
quarter and $283 for the two month fourth quarter, pending the outcome of its
litigation with Sweet and its affiliates. See Note 8. After adjusting for the
Shortfall Payments, Unzipped's reported net income for 11-month Current Year and
Fiscal 2004 was $461 and $1.4 million, respectively.

Prior to August 5, 2004, there was a distribution agreement between Unzipped and
ADS pursuant to which Unzipped paid ADS a per unit fee for warehousing and
distribution functions and per unit fee for processing and invoicing orders. The
agreement also provided for reimbursement for certain operating costs incurred
by ADS and charges for special handling fees at hourly rates approved by
management. Prior to August 5, 2004, there was also a supply agreement in effect
between Unzipped and Azteca pursuant to which Unzipped paid Azteca cost plus 6%
for goods, and was entitled to up to 30 days in which to pay Azteca.

Prior to August 5, 2004, Azteca allocated expenses to Unzipped for Unzipped's
use of a portion of Azteca's office space, design and production team and
support personnel. Unzipped also occupied office space in a building rented by
ADS and Commerce Clothing Company, LLC, a related party to Azteca.

On August 5, 2004, Unzipped terminated the Management Agreement with Sweet, the
supply agreement with Azteca and the distribution agreement with ADS and
commenced a lawsuit against Sweet, Azteca, ADS and Hubert Guez. See Note 8.

The related party transactions, most of which are being disputed in the
litigation as further described in Note 8, are summarized as follows:

11-month
Current Year Fiscal 2004

Products purchased from Azteca $ 22,886 $ 50,907
Allocated office space, design and production team
and support personnel expense from Azteca 118 452
Management fee - -
Shortfall payment per Management Agreement 7,566 1,626
Interest expense paid on Azteca subordinated debt - -
Expenses of distribution services per distribution
agreement with ADS 2,405 3,262

At December 31, 2004, the Company included in accounts payable and accrued
expenses due to Azteca and ADS $847 and $2.3 million respectively. These
amounts, however, are in dispute in the litigation. See Note 8.

In a separate transaction concerning Unzipped with a related party, the amount
to due to BAI at December 31, 2004 was $2.5 million. BAI is the licensee under
the Jeans Wear License and managed the operations of Unzipped following the
termination of Sweet as the manager on August 5, 2004.

F - 13



3. Other Intangibles, net

Other intangibles, net consist of the following:



Estimated December 31, January 31,
Lives 2004 2004
-------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------------
Gross Gross
carrying Accumulated carrying Accumulated
amount amortization amount amortization
-------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------------

Trademarks 20 $25,437 $8,903 $23,630 $7,820
Non-compete agreement 15 2,275 2,255 2,275 2,218
Other intangibles 3 (1) 900 863 900 450
-------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------------
$28,612 $12,021 $26,805 $10,488
============== =========================== =================================


Amortization expense for intangible assets was $1.5 million, $1.8 million, and
$1.7 million for the 11-month Current Year, Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003,
respectively. Amortization expense for intangible assets subject to amortization
for each of the years in the five-year period ending January 31, 2009 is
estimated to be $1.3 million per year.

(1) During the 4th quarter of Fiscal 2004, the Company changed its estimate of
the life of this item from 4 years to 3 years. As a result, the quarterly
amortization is $113 beginning in the 4th quarter of Fiscal 2004. See Note 14.


4. Special Charges

Special charges consist of the following:



11 Months ended 12 Months ended
December 31, January 31,
2004 2004 2003
------------------ -----------------------------

Impairment loss on retail stores expected
to be closed in Fiscal 2004. (A) $ - $ - $ 2,200
Impairment loss and lease obligations on
retail store closings (B) - 1,241 923
Professional fees for the SEC investigation and
various litigation and litigation settlement.
See Note 8. (C) - 583 298
Termination, severance pay of certain employees and
buyout of employment contracts (D) - 743 145
Write-off of fixed assets (E) - 1,567 -
Penalty payment to Sweet. (F) - 83 -
Accrued lease expense for the closed office
space through the end of the lease. (G) - 247 -
Settlement of minimum commissions under
factoring contract (H) - 165 -
Professional fees related to Unzipped's litigation (I) 533 - -
Caruso shareholder lawsuit settlement (J) (238) - -
------------------ -----------------------------
$ 295 $ 4,629 $ 3,566
================== =============================



(A) In the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2003, the Company recorded $2.2
million special charges for the write-off of leasehold
improvements of the 11 concept stores which the Company expects to
close and will not be able to recoup its investment.

(B) In connection with the closing of retail stores. The 2004 charge
includes the settlements of lease obligations of $1.2 million. The
2003 charge includes the write-off of leasehold improvements of
$623 and an estimated cost of lease obligations of $300.

(C) In connection with a class action lawsuit and other litigation
more fully described in Note 8 the Company incurred professional
fees and other related costs.

F - 14


(D) In connection with severance pay for approximately 170 and 10
terminated employees in Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003, respectively.
The Company accrued $178 of severance at January 31, 2004.

(E) In connection with the write-off of computer equipment & software,
leasehold improvements, furniture & fixtures, trade show booths
and displays due to the transition of the wholesales footwear
business in Fiscal 2004 to a licensing operation.

(F) In connection with a late registration filing with SEC related to
the acquisition of Unzipped. See Note 2.

(G) In connection with an office space closing.

(H) In connection with a termination of "the Credit Facility". See
Note 5.

(I) See Note 8.

(J) See Note 8.


5. Debt Arrangements

Revolving Credit Facilities

On January 23, 2002, the Company entered into a three-year $20 million credit
facility ("the Credit Facility") with CIT Commercial Services. Borrowings under
the Credit Facility were formula based and originally included a $5 million over
advance provision with interest at 1.00% above the prime rate. In June 2002, the
Company agreed to amend the Credit Facility to increase the over advance
provision to $7 million and include certain retail inventory in the availability
formula. Borrowings under the amended Credit Facility bore interest at 1.5%
above the prime rate.

At December 31, 2004, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Credit
Facility which was terminated by an agreement dated January 15, 2004.

On February 25, 2003 Unzipped entered into a two-year $25 million credit
facility ("the Unzipped Credit Facility") with GE Capital Commercial Services,
Inc. ("GECCS") . Borrowings were limited by advance rates against eligible
accounts receivable and inventory balances, as defined. Under the facility,
Unzipped could also arrange for letters of credit in an amount up to $5 million.
The borrowings bore interest at a rate of 2.25% per annum in excess of the 30
day Commercial Paper rate or 3%, whichever is greater. The Unzipped Credit
Facility was terminated on October 31, 2004.

Assets-Backed Note

In August 2002, IPH issued in a private placement $20 million of asset-backed
notes secured by intellectual property assets (tradenames, trademarks and
license payments thereon). The notes have a 7-year term with a fixed interest
rate of 7.93% with quarterly principal and interest payments of approximately
$859. The notes are subject to a liquidity reserve account of $2.9 million,
funded by a deposit of a portion of the proceeds of the notes. The net proceeds
of $16.2 million were used to reduce amounts due by the Company under its
existing revolving credit facilities. Costs incurred to obtain this financing
totaled approximately $2.4 million which have been deferred and are being
amortized over the life of the debt. At January 31, 2004, the unamortized
portion of such costs were $2.0 million.

During the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2004, IPH amended the asset-backed
notes whereby it borrowed an additional $3.6 million. The additional borrowing
matures in August, 2009 with a floating interest rate of LIBOR + 4.45%, with
quarterly principal and interest payments and $500 of interest prepaid at
closing. The net proceeds of $2.9 million were used for general working capital
purposes. Costs incurred to obtain this financing totaling approximately $179
were deferred and amortized over the life of the debt.


F - 15


Other

The Company's cash requirements fluctuate from time to time due to, among other
factors, seasonal requirements, including the timing of receipt of merchandise.
The Company believes that it will be able to satisfy its ongoing cash
requirements for the foreseeable future, primarily with cash flow from
operations, and borrowings under the Unzipped Credit Facility. However, if the
Company's plans change or its assumptions prove to be incorrect, it could be
required to obtain additional capital that may not be available to it on
acceptable terms, or at all.

Debt Maturities

The Companies debt maturities are the following:



Total 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 thereafter
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Revolving notes payable - banks $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Due to Sweet (Note 2) 2,993 - - - - - 2,993
Long - term debt 18,937 2,563 3,141 3,391 3,661 6,181 -
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Debt $21,930 $2,563 $3,141 $3,391 $3,661 $6,181 $2,993
============================================================================



6. Stockholders' Equity

Stock Options

The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the
fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully
transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly
subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because
the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly
different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective
input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's
opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single
measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.

The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumptions:

11 Months ended 12 Months ended
December 31, January 31,
--------------- -------------------------
2004 2004 2003
--------------- -------------------------
Expected Volatility .668-.772 .724-.772 .714-.725
Expected Dividend Yield 0% 0% 0%
Expected Life (Term) 3-5 years 3-7 years 2.1-7 years
Risk-Free Interest Rate 3.24-4.06% 1.40-3.55% 3.73-5.18%


The weighted-average fair value of options granted (at their grant date) during
the 11-month Current Year, Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003 was $1.65, $0.97, and
$2.17 per share, respectively.

In 1989, the Company's Board of Directors adopted, and its stockholders
approved, the Company's 1989 Stock Option Plan (the "1989 Plan"). The 1989 Plan,
as amended in 1990, provides for the granting of incentive stock options
("ISO's") and limited stock appreciation rights ("Limited Rights"), covering up
to 222,222 shares of common stock. The 1989 Plan terminated on August 1, 1999.

Under the 1989 Plan, ISO's were to be granted at not less than the market price
of the Company's Common Stock on the date of the grant. Stock options not
covered by the ISO provisions of the 1989 Plan ("Non-Qualifying Stock Options"
or "NQSO's") were granted at prices determined by the Board of Directors. There
were no options outstanding under the 1989 Plan. 5,000 options were outstanding
at the end of each Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003 under 1989 Plan.

On September 4, 1997, the Company's stockholders approved the Company's 1997
Stock Option Plan (the "1997 Plan"). The 1997 Plan authorizes the granting of
common stock options to purchase up to 3,500,000 shares of Company common stock.
All employees, directors, independent agents, consultants and attorneys of the
Company, including those of the Company's subsidiaries, are eligible to be
granted NQSO's under the 1997 Plan. ISO's may be granted only to employees of
the Company or any subsidiary of the Company. The 1997 Plan terminates in 2007.



F - 16


On August 18, 2000, the Company's shareholders approved the Company's 2000 Stock
Option Plan (the "2000 Plan"). The 2000 Plan authorizes the granting of common
stock options to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of Company common stock. All
employees, directors, independent agents, consultants and attorneys of the
Company, including those of the Company's subsidiaries, are eligible to be
granted NQSO's under the 2000 Plan. The 2000 Plan terminates in 2010.

The Company adopted the 2001 Stock Option Plan (the "2001 Plan"). The 2001 Plan
authorizes the granting of common stock options to purchase up to 2,000,000
shares of Company common stock. All employees, directors, independent agents,
consultants and attorneys of the Company, including those of the Company's
subsidiaries, are eligible to be granted NQSO's under the 2001 Plan. The 2001
Plan terminates in 2011.

The Company's shareholders approved the Company's 2002 Stock Option Plan (the
"2002 Plan"). The 2002 Plan authorizes the granting of common stock options to
purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of Company common stock. All employees,
directors, independent agents, consultants and attorneys of the Company,
including those of the Company's subsidiaries, are eligible to be granted ISO's
and NQSO's under the 2002 Plan. The 2002 Plan terminates in 2012.

Additionally, at December 31, 2004, January 31, 2004 and January 31, 2003,
NQSO's covering 2,765,750, 2,600,000 and 2,712,600 shares of common stock,
respectively, were outstanding, which are not part of either the 1989 or 1997
Plans.

The options that were granted under the Plans expire between five and ten years
from the date of grant.

A summary of the Company's stock option activity, and related information for
the 11-month Current Year, Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003 follows:

Weighted-Average
Shares Exercise Price
-----------------------------
Outstanding January 31, 2002 7,185,425 $ 2.31
Granted 1,041,000 3.02
Canceled (169,500) 1.92
Exercised (849,400) 1.35
Expired (768,000) 4.12
-----------------------------
Outstanding January 31, 2003 6,439,525 2.34
Granted 920,000 1.63
Canceled (768,100) 2.96
Exercised (851,619) 1.20
Expired (93,300) 4.09
-----------------------------
Outstanding January 31, 2004 5,646,506 2.29
Granted 1,455,000 2.72
Canceled (512,700) 2.54
Exercised (1,108,680) 1.61
Expired (12,500) 1.94
-----------------------------
Outstanding December 31, 2004 5,467,626 $ 2.52
=============================

At December 31, 2004, January 31, 2004 and January 31, 2003, exercisable stock
options totaled 4,404,375, 4,843,755 and 5,299,689, and had weighted average
exercise prices of $2.44 , $2.26 and $2.28 per share, respectively.

Options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2004 were as follows:




Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------
Weighted Average Weighted Weighted
Range of Number Average Average Number Average
Exercise Prices Outstanding Contractual Life Exercise Price Exercisable Exercise Price
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------

$0.24-1.14................. 491,875 5.34 $1.02 491,875 $1.02
$1.15-1.50................. 467,000 5.82 $1.24 442,000 $1.24
$1.51-2.50................. 1,490,000 8.07 $1.95 1,275,000 $1.93
$2.51-3.50................. 2,653,750 6.01 $3.09 2,061,250 $3.23
$3.51-5.00................. 365,000 9.07 $4.39 150,000 $4.34
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------
5,467,625 6.70 $2.52 4,420,125 $2.45
=============================================================================== ===========================


At December 31, 2004, 2,000,000, 1,620,000, and 888,301 common shares were
reserved for issuance on exercise of stock options under the 2002, 2001, and
2000 Stock Option Plan, respectively.

F - 17


Stockholder Rights Plan

In January 2000, the Company's Board of Directors adopted a stockholder rights
plan. Under the plan, each stockholder of Candie's Common Stock received a
dividend of one right for each share of the Company's outstanding common stock,
entitling the holder to purchase one thousandth of a share of Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock, par value, $0.01 per share of the Company, at an
initial exercise price of $6.00. The rights become exercisable and will trade
separately from the Candie's Common Stock ten business days after any person or
group acquires 15% or more of the Candie's Common Stock, or ten business days
after any person or group announces a tender offer for 15% or more of the
outstanding Candie's Common Stock.

Stock Repurchase Program

On September 15, 1998, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the
repurchase of up to two million shares of the Company's Common Stock, which was
replaced with a new agreement on December 21, 2000, authorizing the repurchase
of up to three million shares of the Company's Common Stock. In the 11-month
Current Year and Fiscal 2004, no shares were repurchased in the open market. In
Fiscal 2003, 84,500 shares were repurchased in the open market, at an aggregate
cost of $192.

Preferred and Common Stock to be Issued

In connection with the settlement of a class action litigation, the Company was
obligated during Fiscal 2000 to issue Common Stock over a 3 year period in the
aggregate amount of $6 million. These shares are reflected in the financial
statements as "Preferred and Common Stock to be Issued." As of January 31, 2003,
all of the shares were issued.


7. Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing
net income available (loss attributable) to common shareholders by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per
share reflect, in periods in which they have a dilutive effect, the effect of
common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options. The difference between
reported basic and diluted weighted-average common shares results from the
assumption that all dilutive stock options outstanding were exercised and all
convertible bonds have been converted into common stock. Diluted loss per share
reflects, in periods in which they have a dilutive effect, the effect of common
shares issuable upon exercise of stock options.

Included in the calculation of the number of shares is the equivalent number of
common shares to be issued in connection with the Litigation Settlement (see
Note 8). As of December 31, 2004, 5,500,000 potentially dilutive shares relating
to stock options were included in the computation of diluted EPS. For periods
prior to the 11-month Current Year, the diluted weighted average number of
shares does not include any outstanding options or convertible preferred stock
because they were antidilutive. As of January 31, 2004, and 2003, 5,600,000 and
6,400,000 potentially dilutive shares relating to stock options were not
included in the computation of diluted EPS because to do so would have been
antidilutive.


8. Commitments and Contingencies


On August 5, 2004, the Company, along with Unzipped, its subsidiary Michael
Caruso & Co., Inc.("Caruso") and IPH (collectively, "Plaintiffs") commenced a
lawsuit in the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, against
Unzipped's former manager, former supplier and former distributor, Sweet,
Azteca, and ADS, and a principal of these entities and former Company Board
member, Hubert Guez (collectively, "Defendants"). Plaintiffs amended their
Complaint on November 22, 2004. In their Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs allege
that Defendants' fraudulently induced Plaintiffs to purchase Sweet's 50%
interest in Unzipped for an inflated price, Sweet and Azteca committed material
breaches of the management, supply and distribution agreements and Hubert Guez
materially breached his fiduciary obligations to the Company while a member of
the Company's Board of Directors, and seeks damages in excess of $50 million.
Additionally, Plaintiffs allege that Defendants have imported, distributed and
sold goods bearing the Company's BONGO trademarks in violation of federal and
California law. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss certain of the claims
asserted in the Amended Complaint, and on February 7, 2005, the Court denied
Defendants' motion in its entirety. Defendants filed an Answer to Plaintiffs'
Amended Complaint on March 10, 2005.

On August 31, 2004, the Superior Court granted Plaintiffs' request for
preliminary injunctive relief, and ordered Defendants to make available to
Plaintiffs approximately 657,000 pairs of BONGO(R) jeans in Defendants'
possession or control upon Plaintiffs making a $75.6 cash payment into the
Court's escrow account and posting a $1.7 million bond with the Court.
Plaintiffs filed the required monies with the Court, and Defendants released the
BONGO(R) jeans encompassed by the Court's injunction. On November 29, 2004, the
Superior Court ruled that Defendants were permitted to sell approximately
141,000 pairs of BONGO jeans in Defendants' possession.

On March 10, 2005, Sweet, Azteca and ADS filed a Cross-Complaint (collectively,
"Cross-Complainants") against Plaintiffs and the Company's Chief Executive
Officer, Neil Cole ("Mr. Cole") seeking compensatory, punitive and exemplary


F - 18


damages and litigation costs, as well as the establishment of a constructive
trust for the benefit of the Cross-Complainants. Cross-Complainants allege that
some or all of the Plaintiffs breached the management, supply and distribution
agreements, IPH and Mr. Cole interfered with Sweet's performance under the
management agreement, and the Company, Caruso and Mr. Cole interfered with
Cross-Complainants' relationships with Unzipped and caused Unzipped to breach
its agreements with Azteca and ADS. Cross-Complainants allege that some or all
of the Company, Caruso and Mr. Cole fraudulently induced Sweet to sell its 50%
interest in Unzipped for a deflated price and enter into the Note.

The Company had previously entered into a management agreement wherein Sweet
guarantees that the net income of Unzipped, as defined, shall be no less than
$1.7 million for each year during the term ("the Guarantee"). In the event that
the Guarantee is not met, Sweet is obligated to pay the difference between the
actual net income, as defined and the Guarantee ("the Shortfall Payment").

Additionally, Cross-Complainants allege that the Company has breached its
obligations to Sweet arising under the Note by, among other things, understating
Unzipped's earnings for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2004 and the first
three quarters of the 11 - month ended December 31, 2004 for the purpose of
causing Unzipped to fall short of minimum earnings guaranteed by Sweet for these
periods (the "Shortfalls"), and improperly offsetting the Shortfalls against the
Note. Cross-Complainants allege that the understatements in Unzipped's earnings
and offsets against the Note were incorporated into the Company's public filings
for the periods identified above, causing the Company to overstate materially
its earnings and understate its liabilities for such period with the effect of
improperly inflating the public trading price of the Company's common stock..
Plaintiffs and Mr. Cole deny Cross-Complainants' allegations and intend to
vigorously defend against the Cross-Complaint.

In January 2002, Redwood Shoe Corporation ("Redwood"), one of the Company's
former buying agents of footwear to the Company, filed a complaint in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that the
Company breached various contractual obligations to Redwood and seeking to
recover damages in excess of $20 million and its litigation costs. The Company
filed a motion to dismiss certain counts of the complaint based upon Redwood's
failure to state a claim, in response to which Redwood has filed an amended
complaint. The Company also moved to dismiss certain parts of the amended
complaint. The magistrate assigned to the matter granted, in part, the Company's
motion to dismiss, and this ruling is currently pending before the District
Court. The Company intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit, and file
counterclaims against Redwood after the District Court rules on the pending
motion to dismiss. At December 31, 2004 and January 31, 2004, the payable to
Redwood totaled approximately $1.8 million which is subject to any claims,
offsets or other deductions the Company may assert against Redwood.

In April 2003, the Company settled the Securities and Exchange Commission's
("SEC") investigation of the Company regarding matters that had been under
investigation by the SEC since July 1999. In connection with the settlement, the
Company, without admitting or denying the SEC's allegations, consented to the
entry by the SEC of an administrative order in which the Company was ordered to
cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future
violations of certain books and records, internal controls, periodic reporting
and the anti-fraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
anti-fraud provisions of the Securities Act of 1933.

In November 2001, the Company settled a litigation filed in December 2000 in the
United States District Court for Southern District of New York, by Michael
Caruso, as trustee of the Claudio Trust and Gene Montasano (collectively,
"Caruso"). The settlement agreement between the Company and Caruso provided for
the Company to pay to Caruso equal quarterly payments of $62.5 up to a maximum
amount of $1 million, over a period of four years. However, the Company's
obligation to make these quarterly payments terminated on or about November 15,
2004 based upon a provision of the settlement agreement that stated that in the
event that the last daily sale price per share of the Company's common stock
reached at least $4.98 during any ten days within a thirty day period, the
Company's obligation to make the quarterly payments would terminate. The
remaining balance of $238 was recognized as a reduction of special charges in
the fourth quarter of the 11-month Current Year.

From time to time, the Company is also made a party to certain litigation
incurred in the normal course of business. While any litigation has an element
of uncertainty, the Company believes that the final outcome of any of these
routine matters will not have a material effect on the Company's future
financial position or liquidity. Except as set forth herein, the Company knows
of no material legal proceedings, pending or threatened, or judgments entered,
against any director or officer of the Company in his capacity as such.

9. Related Party Transactions

On April 3, 1996, the Company entered into an agreement with Redwood, a
principal buying agent of footwear products, to satisfy in full certain trade
payables (the "Payables") amounting to $1.7 million. Under the terms of the
agreement, the Company (i) issued 1,050,000 shares of the Company's Common
Stock; (ii) issued an option to purchase 75,000 shares of the Company's Common
Stock at an exercise price of $1.75 which was immediately exercisable and has a
five year life; and (iii) made a cash payment of $50. The Company purchased
approximately $16 million and $35 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively, of
footwear products through Redwood while it was a related party. During the year
ended January 31, 2002, Redwood sold its Common Stock and a representative from
Redwood resigned from the board of directors of the Company. In doing so it is
no longer considered a related party. At December 31, 2004 and January 31, 2004
and 2003, the payable to Redwood totaled approximately $1.8 million. The payable
at January 31, 2003 is subject to any claims, offsets or other deductions the
Company may assert against Redwood. (See Note 8).

F - 19


On May 1, 2003, the Company granted Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. the exclusive
worldwide license to design, manufacture, sell, distribute and market footwear
under the BONGO brand. The CEO and Chairman of Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. is
Kenneth Cole, who is the brother of Neil Cole, the CEO and President of the
Company.

During Fiscal 2002, Neil Cole, Chairman of the Board, President and CEO of
Candie's, Inc. founded the Candie's Foundation ("the Foundation"), a charitable
foundation whose purpose is to raise national awareness concerning to the
problems of teenage pregnancy. At December 31, 2004 and January 31, 2004, the
Company had a balance due from the Foundation of $227, net of a $50 reserve, and
$174, respectively. The Company believes that the amount due will be recovered
in full although the Foundation's operating history in fund raising activities
is limited. Mr. Cole's wife Liz Cole is employed by the Foundation at an annual
rate of $80 per year.

The Company was advised in the acquisition of Badgley Mischka by UCC
Funding Corporation ("UCC"), of which Robert D'Loren, a director of the Company,
is President. In connection with the services provided in the acquisition, Mr.
D'Loren, the sole shareholder of UCC, received 50,000 stock options. In
addition, UCC will receive a fee of 5% of the gross revenues that the Company
derives from the BADGLEY MISCHKA trademark and all derivative trademarks. In
addition, should the Company sell all or substantially all of the acquired
assets, UCC will receive a cash payment calculated under a formula based on the
sales price.

The Company has a license for BONGO branded bags and small leather/PVC goods
which commenced in Fiscal 2002 with Innovo Group, Inc. ("Innovo"), a company
controlled by Hubert Guez, a former director of the Company and principal of
Sweet, manager of Unzipped. Under this license, which was terminated in December
2004, the Company recorded $136, $126 and $214 in royalty income in the 11-month
Current Year, Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003, respectively, and royalties
receivable from Innovo were $4, $6 and $179 at December 31, 2004, January 31,
2004 and 2003, respectively.

See Note 2 for related party transactions related to Unzipped.

10. Operating Leases

Future net minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating lease
agreements as of December, 2004 are as follows:

2005................. $493
2006................. 217
---
Totals............... $710
====

The leases require the Company to pay additional taxes on the properties,
certain operating costs and contingent rents based on sales in excess of stated
amounts.

Rent expense was approximately $426, $3,315, and $3,047 for the 11-month Current
Year, Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003 respectively. Contingent rent amounts have
been immaterial for all periods.


11. Benefit and Incentive Compensation Plans and Other

The Company sponsors a 401(k) Savings Plan (the "Savings Plan") which covers all
eligible full-time employees. Participants may elect to make pretax
contributions subject to applicable limits. At its discretion, the Company may
contribute additional amounts to the Savings Plan. The Company had no
contributions for the 11-month Current Year and made contributions of $12 and
$24 to the Savings Plan for Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003 respectively.


12. Income Taxes

At December 31, 2004 the Company had available net operating losses ("NOL") of
approximately $54.6 million for income tax purposes, which expire in the years
2006 through 2024. Because of "ownership changes" (as defined in Section 382 of
the Internal Revenue Code) occurring in previous fiscal years, the utilization
of approximately $4.6 million of the net operating losses is limited to $602 per
year and expires in 2006 through 2007. The remaining $50.0 million is not
subject to such limitation and expires 2009 through 2023. Included in the NOL is
$4.8 million as of December 31, 2004 from the exercises of stock options, the
benefit of the utilization of this NOL will go into additional paid in capital.

During the 11-month Current Year and Fiscal 2004, the Company recorded an
increase in its valuation allowance for deferred tax assets of $914 and $5.8
million, respectively, representing that portion of the deferred tax assets that
cannot be reasonably determined to be recoverable from estimated earnings over
the next few years.

F - 20


The income tax provision (benefit) for Federal and state income taxes in the
consolidated statements of operations consists of the following:

December 31 January 31, January 31,
2004 2004 2003
----------- ----------- -----------
Current:
Federal $ - $ - $ (178)
State - 58 39
Total current - 58 (139)

Deferred:
Federal - - -
State - - -
Total deferred - - -

Total provision (benefit) $ - $ 58 $ (139)

The Company's effective income tax rate differs from the federal statutory rate
primarily as a result of releasing a component of the deferred tax valuation
allowance. Overall the valuation allowance increased due to an increase in the
Company's net operating loss carryforward resulting primarily from stock option
deductions for income tax purposes.

The significant components of net deferred tax assets of the Company consist of
the following:

December 31, January 31,
2004 2004
----------------------------

Inventory valuation $ 1,319 $ 1,650
Litigation settlement 258 258
Net operating loss carryforwards 22,643 21,937
Receivable reserves 776 531
Depreciation - -
Store closing reserves (asset impairments) 1,275 1,275
Accrued compensation 16 8
Other 559 290
----------------------------
Total net deferred tax assets 26,846 25,949
Valuation allowance (21,376) (20,462)
----------------------------
Total deferred tax assets 5,470 5,487
Depreciation (67) (43)
Trademarks and licenses (1,616) (1,657)
Other deferred tax liabilities (165) (165)
----------------------------
Total deferred tax liabilities (1,848) (1,865)
----------------------------
Total net deferred tax assets $ 3,622 $ 3,622
============================


13. Segment Information

The Company identifies operating segments based on, among other things, the way
the Company's management organizes the components of its business for purposes
of allocating resources and assessing performance. The Company's operations are
comprised of two reportable segments: footwear/licensing and apparel. Footwear
segment includes Candie's footwear, Bongo footwear, private label footwear,
retail store operations, and licensing. Apparel segment includes Bongo
jeanswear. Segment revenues are generated from the sale of footwear, apparel and
accessories through wholesale channels and the Company's retail locations. The
Company defines segment income as operating income before interest expense and
income taxes. Summarized below are the Company's segment revenues, income (loss)
and total assets by reportable segments for the 11-month Current Year, Fiscal
2004 and Fiscal 2003.



(000's omitted) Footwear/Licensing Apparel Elimination Consolidated
---------------------------------------------------------------------

For the 11 months ended December 31, 2004
Total revenues $ 30,481 $ 38,499 $ - $ 68,980
Segment income 1,841 895 - 2,736
Interest expense 2,495
Income before income tax provision $241

Capital additions $ 24 $ 6 $ - $ 30
Depreciation and amortization expenses $ 1,672 $ 465 $ - $ 2,137

Total assets as of December 31, 2004 $ 31,710 $ 28,450 $ - $ 60,160


F - 21


For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004
Total revenues $ 66,672 $ 64,705 $ - $ 131,377
Segment (loss) income (10,233) 2,069 - (8,164)
Interest expense 3,118
Loss before income tax provision $(11,282)

Capital additions $ 232 $ 16 $ - $ 248
Depreciation and amortization expenses $ 2,400 $ 336 $ - $ 2,736

Total assets as of January 31, 2004 $ 33,896 $ 40,949 $ - $ 74,845


For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2003
Total revenues $101,027 $ 55,869 $ (113) $ 156,783
Segment (loss) income (4,156) 3,195 - (961)
Interest expense 3,373
Loss before income tax provision $ (4,084)

Capital additions $ 1,551 $ 178 $ - $ 1,729
Depreciation and amortization expenses $ 3,278 $ 37 $ - $ 3,315

Total assets as of January 31, 2003 $ 57,375 $ 46,062 $ - $ 103,437








14. Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Information

Unaudited interim consolidated financial information for the 11-month Current
Year and Fiscal 2004 is summarized as follows:



First Second Third Fourth
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
-----------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands except per share data)

11-month Current Year
Net sales $ 11,837 $ 26,590 $ 10,679 $ 5,851
Total revenues 13,773 28,674 13,404 7,677
Gross profit 4,942 5,894 6,084 3,831
Operating income (loss) 729 1,258 1,260 (510)
Net income (loss) $ 33 $ 518 $ 603 $ (912)

Basic earnings (loss) per share $ 0.00 $ 0.02 $ 0.02 $ (0.03)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share $ 0.00 $ 0.02 $ 0.02 $ (0.03)

Fiscal 2004
Net sales $ 40,863 $ 40,214 $ 25,305 $ 18,421
Total revenues 42,041 42,055 27,113 20,168
Gross profit 11,894 9,069 5,924 1,886
Operating income (loss) 1,599 (2,937) (1,091) (5,735)
Net income (loss) $ 726 $ (3,780) $ (1,884) $ (6,402)

Basic earnings (loss) per share $ 0.03 $ (0.15) $ (0.07) $ (0.25)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share $ 0.03 $ (0.15) $ (0.07) $ (0.25)



During the two month fourth quarter of the 11-month Current Year, the Company
recorded certain significant expenses as follows: (i) $434 for legal
professional fees relating to litigation involving Unzipped, which was offset by
$238 of special income resulting from the Company's termination of certain long
term debt payments; (ii) additional $38 of amortization expense, reflecting the
acceleration of amortization of the Unzipped purchase price, see Note 2.


F - 22


15. Change in Fiscal Year End

As discussed in Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - the
Company's fiscal year end has changed from January 31 to December 31.
Accordingly, the Company is presenting audited financial statements for the 11
months ended December 31, 2004 in this Form 10-K. The following table provides
certain unaudited financial information for the same period of the prior year.

11 months ended
December 31
2004 2003(1)
--------------------------------------------
Net Sales $60,409 $118,130
Licensing Income 8,571 4,827
Gross Profit 20,751 27,402
Income (loss) before income taxes 241 (7,532)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes - -
Net Income (loss) 241 (7,576)
Basic earnings (loss) per share $0.01 $(0.30)
Diluted earning (loss) per share $0.01 $(0.30)

(1) Unaudited






F - 23





REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Candies, Inc.

The audits referred to in our report dated March 18, 2005, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Candie's, Inc. and Subsidiaries, which is
contained in Item 8 of the Form 10-K included the audits of the financial
statement schedule listed in the accompanying index for the 11-month ended
December 31, 2004 and each of the two years in the period ended January 31,
2004. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial
statement schedule based upon our audits.

In our opinion the financial statement schedule presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.





/s/: BDO Seidman, LLP
BDO Seidman, LLP



March 18, 2005
New York, New York



S - 1




Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Candie's, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In thousands)




Column A Column B Column C Column D Column E
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additions
Balance at Charged to Balance at
Beginning of Costs and End of
Description Period Expenses Deductions Period
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reserves and allowances deducted from asset accounts:

Accounts receivable reserves (a):

11 month ended December 31, 2004 $ 1,271 $ 1,099 $ 514 $ 1,856

Year ended January 31, 2004 $ 2,982 $ 12,121 $ 13,832 $ 1,271

Year ended January 31, 2003 $ 1,178 $ 14,313 $ 12,509 $ 2,982


Inventory reserves:

11 month ended December 31, 2004 $ 4,094 $ 1,937 $ 3,779 $ 2,252

Year ended January 31, 2004 $ 3,247 $ 4,004 $ 3,157 $ 4,094

Year ended January 31, 2003 $ 439 $ 4,239 $ 1,431 $ 3,247



(a) These amounts include reserves for chargebacks, markdowns, co-op advertising
allowances, and bad debts.





S - 2