Back to GetFilings.com





SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 (FEE REQUIRES)

For the fiscal year ended              March 31, 2002                       

Commission File Number                    0-19022                           

                          Gateway Tax Credit Fund II Ltd.                   
           (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

          Florida                                  65-0142704               
(State or other jurisdiction of               ( I.R.S. Employer No.)
incorporation or organization)

     880 Carillon Parkway,   St. Petersburg,   Florida    33716              
    (Address of principal executive offices)            (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone No., Including Area Code:   (727)573-3800             

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:   None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title of Each Class:   Beneficial Assignee Certificates

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

                                   YES   X         NO      

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to item 405 of Regulation S-K (Sec. 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will be contained to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   X  


                                                   Number of Units
  Title of Each Class                               March 31, 2002
Beneficial Assignee Certificates                        2,258
General Partner Interest                                    2

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Parts III and IV - Form S-11 Registration Statement 
and all amendments and supplements thereto.
     File No. 33-31821


PART I

Item 1.  Business

   Gateway Tax Credit Fund II Ltd. ("Gateway") is a Florida Limited Partnership. The general partners are Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc., the Managing General Partner, and Raymond James Partners, Inc., both sponsors of Gateway Tax Credit Fund II Ltd. and wholly-owned subsidiaries of Raymond James Financial, Inc.

   Pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, Gateway filed a Form S-11 Registration Statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, effective September 12, 1989, which covered the offering (the "Public Offering") of Gateway's Beneficial Assignee Certificates ("BACs") representing assignments of units for the beneficial interest of the limited partnership interest of the Assignor Limited Partner. The Assignor Limited Partner was formed for the purpose of serving in that capacity for the Fund and will not engage in any other business.

   Gateway is engaged in only one industry segment, to acquire limited partnership interests in unaffiliated limited partnerships ("Project Partnerships"), each of which owns and operates one or more apartment complexes eligible for Low-Income Housing Tax Credits under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code ("Tax Credits"), received over a ten year period. Subject to certain limitations, Tax Credits may be used by Gateway's investors to reduce their income tax liability generated from other income sources. Gateway will terminate on December 31, 2040, or sooner, in accordance with the terms of its Limited Partnership Agreement. As of March 31, 2002, Gateway had received capital contributions of $1,000 from the General Partners and $37,228,000 from Assignees.

   Gateway offered BACs in five series. BACs in the amounts of $6,136,000, $5,456,000, $6,915,000, $8,616,000 and $10,105,000 for Series 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively had been issued as of March 31, 2002. Each series is treated as a separate partnership, investing in a separate and distinct pool of Project Partnerships. Net proceeds from each series were used to acquire Project Partnerships which are specifically allocated to such series. Income or loss and all tax items from the Project Partnerships acquired by each series are specifically allocated among the Assignees of such series.

   Operating profits and losses, cash distributions from operations and Tax Credits are allocated 99% to the Assignees and 1% to the General Partners. Profit or loss and cash distributions from sales of property will be allocated as described in the Limited Partnership Agreement.

   As of March 31, 2002, Gateway had invested in 22 Project Partnerships for Series 2, 23 Project Partnerships for Series 3, 29 Project Partnerships for Series 4, 36 Project Partnerships for Series 5 and 38 Project Partnerships for Series 6. Gateway acquired its interests in these properties by becoming a limited partner in the Project Partnerships that own the properties. As of March 31, 2002 each series was fully invested in Project Partnerships and management plans no new investments in the future.

   The primary source of funds from the inception of each series has been the capital contributions from Assignees. Gateway's operating costs are funded using the reserves, established for this purpose, the interest earned on these reserves and distributions received from Project Partnerships.

   All but two of the Project Partnerships are government subsidized with mortgage loans from the Farmers Home Administration (now called United States Department of Agriculture- Rural Development) ("USDA-RD") under Section 515 of the Housing Act of 1949. These mortgage loans are made at low interest rates for multi-family housing in rural and suburban areas, with the requirement that the interest savings be passed on to low income tenants in the form of lower rents. A significant portion of the project partnerships also receive rental assistance from USDA-RD to subsidize certain qualifying tenants.

   The General Partners do not believe the Project Partnerships are subject to the risks generally associated with conventionally financed nonsubsidized apartment

properties. Risks related to the operations of Gateway are described in detail on pages 23 through 34 of the Prospectus, as supplemented, under the Caption "Risk Factors" which is incorporated herein by reference. The investment objectives of Gateway are to:

   1)  Provide tax benefits to Assignees in the form of Tax Credits during the        period in which each Project is eligible to claim tax credits;

   2)  Preserve and protect the capital contribution of Investors;

   3)  Participate in any capital appreciation in the value of the Projects; and

   4)  Provide passive losses to i) individual investors to offset passive income        from other passive activities, and ii) corporate investors to offset business        income.

   The investment objectives and policies of Gateway are described in detail on pages 34 through 40 of the Prospectus, as supplemented, under the caption "Investment Objectives and Policies" which is incorporated herein by reference.

   Gateway's goal was to invest in a diversified portfolio of Project Partnerships located in rural and suburban locations with a high demand for low income housing. As of March 31, 2002 the investor capital contributions were successfully invested in Project Partnerships, which met the investment criteria. Management anticipates that competition for tenants will only be with other low income housing projects and not with conventionally financed housing. With significant number of rural American households living below the poverty level in substandard housing, management believes there will be a continuing demand for affordable low income housing for the foreseeable future.

   Gateway has no direct employees. Services are performed by the Managing General Partner and its affiliates and by agents retained by it. The Managing General Partner has full and exclusive discretion in management and control of Gateway.

Item 2.  Properties

   Gateway owns a majority interest in properties through its limited partnership investments in Project Partnerships. The largest single investment in a Project Partnership in Series 2 is 12.2% of the Series' total assets, Series 3 is 6.6%, Series 4 is 6.3%, Series 5 is 8.1% and Series 6 is 6.5%. The following table provides certain summary information regarding the Project Partnerships in which Gateway had an interest as of December 31, 2001:


Item 2 - Properties (continued):

SERIES 2



PARTNERSHIP
- -----------


LOCATION OF
PROPERTY
- -----------


# OF
UNIT
- -----


DATE  
ACQUIRED
- --------


PROPERTY
COST  
- -----------

OCCU-
PANCY
RATE
- -----

Claxton Elderly

Deerfield II

Hartwell Family

Cherrytree Apts.

Springwood Apts.

Lakeshore Apts.

Lewiston

Charleston

Sallisaw II

Pocola

Inverness Club

Pearson Elderly

Richland Elderly

Lake Park

Woodland Terrace

Mt. Vernon Elderly

Lakeland Elderly

Prairie Apartments

Sylacauga Heritage

Manchester Housing

Durango C.W.W.

Columbus Seniors

Claxton, GA

Douglas, GA

Hartwell, GA

Albion, PA

Westfield, NY

Tuskegee, AL

Lewiston, NY

Charleston, AR

Sallisaw, OK

Pocola, OK

Inverness, FL

Pearson, GA

Richland, GA

Lake Park, GA

Waynesboro, GA

Mt. Vernon, GA

Lakeland, GA

Eagle Butte, SD

Sylacauga, AL

Manchester, GA

Durango, CO

Columbus, KS

24

24

24

33

32

34

25

32

47

36

72

25

33

48

30

21

29

21

44

49

24

16
- ----
723

9/90

9/90

9/90

9/90

9/90

9/90

10/90

9/90

9/90

10/90

9/90

9/90

9/90

9/90

9/90

9/90

9/90

10/90

12/90

1/91

1/91

5/92

$799,538

854,562

859,698

1,439,636

1,512,872

1,278,341

1,233,935

1,076,098

1,517,589

1,245,870

3,496,824

781,460

1,057,871

1,794,542

1,079,691

700,935

955,815

1,274,335

1,761,852

1,781,301

1,307,669

520,066
- -----------
$28,330,500

100%

100%

92%

88%

94%

100%

96%

88%

96%

92%

85%

100%

88%

90%

93%

76%

100%

100%

91%

94%

100%

100%

   

====

 

===========

 
           

The aggregate average effective rental per unit is $3,576 per year ($298 per month).

Inverness Club Ltd.'s fixed asset total is 12.2% of the Series 2 total Project Partnership fixed assets. Inverness Club was placed in service in October 1991, is located on Florida's West Coast and operates as a low-income 72 unit apartment facility for the elderly. It also offers an optional congregate services package to all tenants. The property competes for tenants with six other apartment properties in the area. The market study estimated a demand for 100 elderly units.

Inverness Club's occupancy rate was 85% and its average effective annual rental per unit was $4,879 ($407 per month) on December 31, 2001. The land cost was $205,500 and the building cost was $3,291,324. The building is depreciated using the straight line method over 27.5 years. Management believes the property insurance coverage is adequate. For the year ended December 31, 2001 the real estate taxes were $64,300.

Item 2 - Properties (continued):
SERIES 3
PARTNERSHIP
- -----------



LOCATION OF
PROPERTY
- -----------



# OF
UNIT
- -----



DATE
ACQUIRED
- --------



PROPERTY
COST
- -----------


OCCU-
PANCY
RATE
- -----

Poteau II

Sallisaw

Nowata Properties

Waldron Properties

Roland II

Stilwell

Birchwood Apts.

Hornellsville

Sunchase II

CE McKinley II

Weston Apartments

Countrywood Apts.

Wildwood Apts.

Hancock

Hopkins

Elkhart Apts.

Bryan Senior

Brubaker Square

Southwood

Villa Allegra

Belmont Senior

Heritage Villas

Logansport Seniors

Poteau, OK

Sallisaw, OK

Oolagah, OK

Waldron, AR

Roland, OK

Stilwell, OK

Pierre, SD

Arkport, NY

Watertown, SD

Rising Sun, MD

Weston, AL

Centreville, AL

Pineville, LA

Hawesville, KY

Madisonville, KY

Elkhart, TX

Bryan, OH

New Carlisle, OH

Savannah, TN

Celina, OH

Cynthiana, KY

Helena, GA

Logansport, LA

52

52

32

24

52

48

24

24

41

16

10

40

28

12

24

54

40

38

44

32

24

25

32
- ----
768

8/90

8/90

8/90

9/90

10/90

10/90

9/90

9/90

9/90

9/90

11/90

11/90

11/90

12/90

12/90

1/91

1/91

1/91

1/91

1/91

1/91

3/91

3/91

$1,789,148

1,744,103

1,148,484

860,273

1,804,010

1,597,701

1,072,975

1,122,594

1,377,916

826,883

339,949

1,564,882

1,086,720

440,425

927,256

1,598,400

1,188,292

1,459,016

1,801,011

1,150,622

935,143

824,759

1,109,993
- ---------
$27,770,555

94%

100%

97%

92%

83%

88%

63%

92%

100%

94%

100%

100%

93%

100%

96%

94%

95%

87%

98%

97%

100%

100%

100%

   

====

 

===========

 

The average effective rental per unit is $3,158 per year ($263 per month).


Item 2 - Properties (continued):

SERIES 4



PARTNERSHIP
- -----------


LOCATION OF
PROPERTY
- -----------


# OF
UNIT
- ----


DATE  
ACQUIRED
- --------


PROPERTY
COST  
- --------

OCCU-
PANCY
RATE
- ------

Alsace

Seneca Apartments

Eudora Senior

Westville

Wellsville Senior

Stilwell II

Spring Hill Sr.

Smithfield

Tarpon Heights

Oaks Apartments

Wynnwood Common

Chestnut

Apts -St. George

Williston

Brackettville Sr.

Sonora Seniors

Ozona Seniors

Fredericksburg Sr.

St. Joseph

Courtyard

Rural Development

Jasper Villas

Edmonton Senior

Jonesville Manor

Norton Green

Owingsville Senior

Timpson Seniors

Piedmont

S.F. Arkansas City

Soda Springs, ID

Seneca, MO

Eudora, KS

Westville, OK

Wellsville, KS

Stilwell, OK

Spring Hill, KS

Smithfield, UT

Galliano, LA

Oakdale, LA

Fairchance, PA

Howard, SD

St. George, SC

Williston, SC

Brackettville, TX

Sonora, TX

Ozona, TX

Fredericksburg, TX

St. Joseph, IL

Huron, SD

Ashland, ME

Jasper, AR

Edmonton, KY

Jonesville, VA

Norton, VA

Owingsville, KY

Timpson, TX

Barnesville, GA

Arkansas City, KS

24

24

36

36

24

52

24

40

48

32

34

24

24

24

32

32

24

48

24

21

25

25

24

40

40

22

28

36

12
- ----
879

12/90

2/91

3/91

3/91

3/91

3/91

3/91

4/91

4/91

4/91

4/91

5/91

6/91

6/91

6/91

6/91

6/91

6/91

6/91

6/91

6/91

6/91

6/91

6/91

6/91

8/91

8/91

8/91

8/91

$823,605

742,204

1,257,482

1,101,686

810,970

1,657,974

1,036,369

1,885,097

1,493,434

1,045,982

1,679,018

1,070,451

939,655

1,002,600

1,042,263

1,047,032

802,089

1,444,252

976,883

860,189

1,422,482

1,105,278

906,714

1,729,510

1,719,002

853,294

815,916

1,289,047

412,028
- ---------
$32,972,506

96%

96%

100%

100%

96%

94%

88%

95%

100%

97%

100%

67%

96%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

96%

100%

88%

88%

96%

100%

98%

100%

93%

97%

100%

   

====

 

==========

 

The average effective rental per unit is $3,475 per year ($290 per month).


Item 2 - Properties (continued):

SERIES 5



PARTNERSHIP
- -----------


LOCATION OF
PROPERTY
- -----------


# OF
UNIT
- ----


DATEE
ACQUIREDD
- --------


PROPERTY
COST
- --------

OCCU-
PANCY
RATE
- -----

Seymour

Effingham

S.F. Winfield

S.F.Medicine Lodge

S.F. Ottawa

S.F. Concordia

Highland View

Carrollton Club

Scarlett Oaks

Brooks Hill

Greensboro

Greensboro II

Pine Terrace

Shellman

Blackshear

Crisp Properties

Crawford

Yorkshire

Woodcrest

Fox Ridge

Redmont II

Clayton

Alma

Pemberton Village

Magic Circle

Spring Hill

Menard Retirement

Wallis Housing

Zapata Housing

Mill Creek

Portland II

Georgetown

Cloverdale

So. Timber Ridge

Pineville

Ravenwood

Seymour, IN

Effingham, IL

Winfield, KS

Medicine Lodge,KS

Ottawa, KS

Concordia, KS

Elgin, OR

Carrollton, GA

Lexington, SC

Ellijay, GA

Greensboro, GA

Greensboro, GA

Wrightsville, GA

Shellman, GA

Cordele, GA

Cordele, GA

Crawford, GA

Wagoner, OK

South Boston, VA

Russellville, AL

Red Bay, AL

Clayton, OK

Alma, AR

Hiawatha, KS

Eureka, KS

Spring Hill, KS

Menard, TX

Wallis, TX

Zapata, TX

Grove, OK

Portland, IN

Georgetown, OH

Cloverdale, IN

Chandler, TX

Pineville, MO

Americus, GA

37

24

12

16

24

20

24

78

40

44

24

33

25

27

46

31

25

60

40

24

24

24

24

24

24

36

24

24

40

60

20

24

24

44

12

24
- -----
1,106

8/91

8/91

8/91

8/91

8/91

8/91

9/91

9/91

9/91

9/91

9/91

9/91

9/91

9/91

9/91

9/91

9/91

9/91

9/91

9/91

9/91

9/91

9/91

9/91

9/91

9/91

9/91

9/91

9/91

11/91

11/91

11/91

1/92

1/92

5/92

1/94

1,517,702

980,617

402,402

564,559

732,342

692,426

893,154

3,217,901

1,677,363

1,753,174

866,259

1,088,664

885,186

901,648

1,602,149

1,127,071

907,712

2,574,298

1,574,776

889,941

840,596

871,530

957,710

776,725

823,643

1,449,378

760,852

578,333

1,238,405

1,741,669

780,437

959,965

962,915

1,308,876

409,427

900,996
- ----------
$40,210,801

78%

96%

92%

100%

100%

100%

100%

97%

98%

98%

96%

100%

92%

100%

100%

100%

100%

98%

98%

96%

100%

96%

100%

92%

88%

94%

100%

92%

100%

97%

100%

100%

100%

93%

100%

100%

   

=====

 

============

 

The average effective rental per unit is $3,355 per year ($280 per month).


Item 2 - Properties (continued):

SERIES 6



PARTNERSHIP
- -----------


LOCATION OF
PROPERTY
- -----------


# OF
UNIT
- -----


DATE
ACQUIRED
- --------


PROPERTY
COST
- --------

OCCU-
PANCY
RATE
- -----

Spruce

Shannon

Carthage

Mountain Crest

Coal City

Blacksburg Terrace

Frazer Place

Ehrhardt

Sinton

Frankston

Flagler Beach

Oak Ridge

Monett

Arma

Southwest City

Meadowcrest

Parsons

Newport Village

Goodwater Falls

Northfield Station

Pleasant Hill

Winter Park

Cornell

Heritage Drive So.

Brodhead

Mt. Village

Hazlehurst

Sunrise

Stony Creek

Logan Place

Haines

Maple Wood

Summerhill

Dorchester

Lancaster

Autumn Village

Hardy

Dawson

Pierre, SD

O'Neill, NE

Carthage, MO

Enterprise, OR

Coal City, IL

Blacksburg, SC

Smyrna, DE

Ehrhardt, SC

Sinton, TX

Frankston, TX

Flagler Beach, FL

Williamsburg, KY

Monett, MO

Arma, KS

Southwest City, MO

Luverne, AL

Parsons, KS

Newport, TN

Jenkins, KY

Corbin, KY

Somerset, KY

Mitchell, SD

Watertown, SD

Jacksonville, TX

Brodhead, KY

Mt. Vernon, KY

Hazlehurst, MS

Yankton, SD

Hooversville, PA

Logan, OH

Haines, AK

Barbourville, KY

Gassville, AR

St. George, SC

Mountain View, AR

Harrison, AR

Hardy, AR

Dawson, GA

24

16

24

39

24

32

30

16

32

24

43

24

32

28

12

32

48

40

36

24

24

24

24

40

24

24

32

33

32

40

32

24

28

12

33

16

24

40
- -----
1,086

11/91

11/91

1/92

3/92

3/92

4/92

4/92

4/92

4/92

4/92

5/92

5/92

5/92

5/92

5/92

6/92

7/92

7/92

7/92

7/92

7/92

7/92

7/92

1/92

7/92

7/92

8/92

8/92

8/92

9/92

8/92

8/92

9/92

9/92

9/92

7/92

7/92

11/93

1,136,691

675,251

731,133

1,244,525

1,258,825

1,357,066

1,676,842

685,776

1,053,059

674,981

1,653,116

1,037,966

970,357

881,140

407,837

1,206,133

1,532,968

1,619,953

1,399,638

1,022,561

967,376

1,273,535

1,092,468

1,215,014

962,793

943,900

1,193,657

1,420,160

1,649,283

1,526,912

3,037,929

1,025,489

844,240

562,272

1,383,886

615,604

936,515

1,474,973
- ----------
$44,351,824

63%

100%

96%

79%

100%

97%

97%

94%

97%

100%

100%

92%

91%

96%

100%

100%

96%

95%

97%

83%

96%

100%

100%

100%

92%

96%

97%

100%

94%

88%

84%

96%

96%

100%

100%

100%

96%

100%

   

=====

 

===========

 

The average effective rental per unit is $3,589 per year ($299 per month).


Item 2 - Properties (continued):

A summary of the cost of the properties at December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 is as follows:

         12/31/01

 

SERIES 2

SERIES 3

SERIES 4

Land
Land Improvements
Buildings
Furniture and Fixtures
Construction in Progress

Properties, at Cost
Less: Accum.Depreciation

Properties, Net

$ 1,012,180
125,464
26,261,278
931,578
0
- -----------
28,330,500
10,152,720
- -----------
$18,177,780

$   985,546
251,976
25,247,403
1,285,630
0
- -----------
27,770,555
12,513,532
- -----------
$15,257,023

$ 1,188,112
164,057
30,125,849
1,494,488
0
- -----------
32,972,506
11,277,285
- -----------
$21,695,221

 

===========

===========

===========

 

SERIES 5

SERIES 6

TOTAL

Land
Land Improvements
Buildings
Furniture and Fixtures
Construction in Progress

Properties, at Cost
Less: Accum.Depreciation

Properties, Net

$ 1,456,671
72,944
37,045,749
1,635,437
0
- -----------
40,210,801
13,336,649
- -----------
$26,874,152

$ 1,779,755
534,541
39,858,054
2,179,474
0
- -----------
44,351,824
13,603,728
- -----------
$30,748,096

$  6,422,264
1,148,982
158,538,333
7,526,607
0
- ------------
173,636,186
60,883,914
- ------------
$112,752,272

 

===========

===========

============

         12/31/00

 

SERIES 2

SERIES 3

SERIES 4

Land
Land Improvements
Buildings
Furniture and Fixtures
Construction in Progress

Properties, at Cost
Less: Accum.Depreciation

Properties, Net

$ 1,012,180 
123,358 
26,249,454 
908,034 

- -----------
28,293,026 
9,287,713 
- -----------
$19,005,313 

$   985,546 
379,665 
25,021,159 
1,234,233 

- -----------
27,620,603 
11,579,979 
- -----------
$16,040,624 

$ 1,188,112 
153,052 
29,917,751 
1,465,181 

- -----------
32,724,096 
10,297,994 
- -----------
$22,426,102 

 

===========

===========

===========

 

SERIES 5

SERIES 6

TOTAL

Land
Land Improvements
Buildings
Furniture and Fixtures
Construction in Progress

Properties, at Cost
Less: Accum.Depreciation

Properties, Net

$ 1,456,671 
72,944 
37,006,489 
1,612,553 

- -----------
40,148,657 
12,049,324 
- -----------
$28,099,333 

$ 1,779,755 
531,557 
39,822,962 
2,090,579 

- -----------
44,224,853 
12,258,319 
- -----------
$31,966,534 

$  6,422,264 
1,260,576 
158,017,815 
7,310,580 

- ------------
173,011,235 
55,473,329 
- ------------
$117,537,906 

 

===========

===========

============


                                            12/31/99

 

SERIES 2

SERIES 3

SERIES 4

Land
Land Improvements
Buildings
Furniture and Fixtures
Construction in Progress

Properties, at Cost
Less: Accum.Depreciation

Properties, Net

$ 1,012,180 
123,358 
26,249,454 
898,766 

- -----------
28,283,758 
8,394,446 
- -----------
$19,889,312 

$   985,546 
379,665 
25,015,969 
1,192,726 

- -----------
27,573,906 
10,647,074 
- -----------
$16,926,832 

$ 1,188,112 
137,610 
29,894,951 
1,436,736 

- -----------
32,657,409 
9,323,398 
- -----------
$23,334,011 

 

===========

===========

===========

 

SERIES 5

SERIES 6

TOTAL

Land
Land Improvements
Buildings
Furniture and Fixtures
Construction in Progress

Properties, at Cost
Less: Accum.Depreciation

Properties, Net

$ 1,456,671 
66,384 
36,914,988 
1,563,738 

- -----------
40,001,781 
10,765,825 
- -----------
$29,235,956 

$ 1,779,755 
517,455 
39,804,795 
2,012,364 

- -----------
44,114,369 
10,920,837 
- -----------
$33,193,532 

$  6,422,264 
1,224,472 
157,880,157 
7,104,330 

- ------------
172,631,223 
50,051,580 
- ------------
$122,579,643 

 

===========

===========

============

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

  Gateway is not a party to any material pending legal proceedings.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

  As of March 31, 2002, no matters were submitted to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.


PART II

Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Securities and Related Security Holder Matters

(a)  Gateway's Limited Partnership interests (BACs) are not publicly traded. There is no market for Gateway's Limited Partnership interests and it is unlikely that any will develop. No transfers of Limited Partnership Interest or BAC Units are permitted without the prior written consent of the Managing General Partner. There have been several transfers from inception to date with most being from individuals to their trusts or heirs. The Managing General Partner is not aware of the price at which the units are transferred. The conditions under which investors may transfer units is found under ARTICLE XII - "Issuance of BAC'S" on pages A-29 and A-30 of the Limited Partnership Agreement within the Prospectus, which is incorporated herein by reference.

     There have been no distributions to Assignees from inception to date.

(b)  Approximate Number of Equity Security Holders:

Title of Class                                    Number of Holders
                                                as of March 31, 2002
Beneficial Assignee Certificates                        2,258
General Partner Interest                                  2

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,:

SERIES 2

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

1999
- ----

1998
- ----

Total Revenues

$  36,666 

$  43,114 

$  40,198 

$  41,405 

$  41,272 

Net Loss

(99,198)

(123,576)

(166,538)

(221,305)

(337,693)

Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships



(43,931)



(76,493)



(115,544)



(126,899)



(288,412)

Total Assets

575,947 

634,752 

723,067 

853,057 

1,045,569 

Investments In Project Partnerships



78,301 



124,529 



208,215 



331,579 



510,805 

Per BAC: (A)
Tax Credits
Portfolio
 Income
Passive Loss


64.12 

11.87 
(148.48)


162.60 

14.10 
(127.50)


166.30 

12.20 
(141.60)


166.30 

12.90 
(144.60)


166.40 

13.10  (147.90)

Net Loss

(16.00)

(19.94)

(26.87)

(35.71)

(54.48)

           

FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,:

SERIES 3

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

1999
- ----

1998
- ----

Total Revenues

$  42,526 

$  52,385 

$  51,385 

$  44,329 

$  65,111 

Net Loss

(80,062)

(58,677)

(147,068)

(187,324)

(221,508)

Equity in Losses of
Project
Partnerships




(34,441)




(26,094)




(114,700)




(105,820)




(198,168)

Total Assets

465,530 

512,301 

545,897 

669,866 

846,210 

Investments In Project Partnerships



34,601 



71,138 



100,190 



218,820 



378,000 

Per BAC: (A)
Tax Credits
Portfolio
 Income
Passive Loss


6.22 

13.83 
(154.72)


44.70 

14.00 
(156.40)


68.90 

12.80 
(151.20)


164.30 

14.10 
(145.00)


176.60 

20.10 
(154.10)

Net Loss

(14.53)

(10.65)

(26.69)

(33.99)

(40.19)

           

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,:

SERIES 4

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

1999
- ----

1998
- ----

Total Revenues

$  44,426 

$  51,145 

$  48,997 

$  46,672 

$  44,309 

Net Loss

(185,366)

(311,663)

(235,491)

(348,671)

(485,415)

Equity in Losses of Project
Partnerships



(118,314)



(254,163)



(175,823)



(208,919)



(421,886)

Total Assets

663,983 

807,069 

1,082,020 

1,280,602 

1,600,054 

Investments In Project Partnerships



96,741 



223,689 



487,692 



676,348 



981,823 

Per BAC: (A)
Tax Credits
Portfolio
 Income
Passive Loss


82.68 

12.51  (149.99)


165.70 

15.00  (160.40)


168.60 

14.30 
(137.50)


168.60 

14.10  (136.00)


168.60 

13.70  (157.20)

Net Loss

(26.54)

(44.62)

(33.71)

(49.92)

(69.50)

           

FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,:

SERIES 5

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

1999
- ----

1998
- ----

Total Revenues

$  58,867 

$  64,244 

$  65,839 

$  64,661 

$  54,417 

Net Loss

(268,277)

(248,131)

(243,982)

(403,555)

(813,502)

Equity in Losses of Project
Partnerships



(189,327)



(179,765)



(178,140)



(300,042)



(728,729)

Total Assets

1,298,281 

1,519,231 

1,728,422 

1,932,914 

2,306,065 

Investments In Project Partnerships



550,146 



752,227 



951,449 



1,145,581 



1,500,087 

Per BAC: (A)
Tax Credits
Portfolio
 Income
Passive Loss


153.83 

12.75 
(145.76)


164.60 

15.60 
(140.30)


164.60 

14.30 
(134.60)


164.60 

14.40  (149.20)


164.60 

14.10  (141.60)

Net Loss

(30.83)

(28.51)

(28.03)

(46.37)

(93.47)

           

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,:

SERIES 6

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

1999
- ---

1998
- ----

Total Revenues

$  52,783 

$  57,541 

$  54,234 

$  50,722 

$  49,707 

Net Loss

(407,763)

(481,031)

(531,947)

(701,324)

(870,137)

Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships




(306,042)




(384,730)




(433,597)




(601,405)




(761,923)

Total Assets

2,016,612 

2,364,264 

2,793,368 

3,272,734 

3,930,665 

Investments In Project Partnerships



1,257,026 



1,584,877 



1,997,390 



2,464,086 



3,102,793 

Per BAC: (A)
Tax Credits
Portfolio
 Income
Passive Loss


167.27 

11.24 
(127.50)


165.60 

13.80 
(127.30)


165.50 

12.70 
(126.50)


165.50 

12.90  (129.30)


165.50 

12.90  (124.30)

Net Loss

(39.95)

(47.13)

(52.12)

(68.54)

(85.25)

           

(A) The per BAC tax information is as of December 31, the year end for tax purposes.

The above selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report. This statement is not covered by the auditor's opinion included elsewhere in this report.


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Results of Operations, Liquidity and Capital Resources

  Operations commenced on September 14, 1990, with the first admission of Assignees in Series 2. The proceeds from Assignees' capital contributions available for investment were used to acquire interests in Project Partnerships.

  As disclosed on the statement of operations for each Series, except as described below, interest income is comparable for the years ended March 31, 2002, March 31, 2001 and March 31, 2000. The General and Administrative expenses - General Partner and General and Administrative expenses - Other for the year ended March 31, 2002 are comparable to March 31, 2001 and March 31, 2000.

  The capital resources of each Series are used to pay General and Administrative operating costs including personnel, supplies, data processing, travel and legal and accounting associated with the administration and monitoring of Gateway and the Project Partnerships. The capital resources are also used to pay the Asset Management Fee due the Managing General Partner, but only to the extent that Gateway's remaining resources are sufficient to fund Gateway's ongoing needs. (Payment of any Asset Management Fee unpaid at the time Gateway sells its interests in the Project Partnerships is subordinated to the return of the investors' original capital contributions).

  The sources of funds to pay the operating costs of each Series are short term investments and interest earned thereon, the maturity of U.S. Treasury Security Strips ("Zero Coupon Treasuries") which were purchased with funds set aside for
this purpose, and cash distributed to the Series from the operations of the Project Partnerships.

  From inception, no Series has paid distributions and management does not anticipate distributions in the future.

  Series 2 - Gateway closed this series on September 14, 1990 after receiving $6,136,000 from 375 Assignees. As of March 31, 2002, the series had invested $4,524,678 in 22 Project Partnerships located in 10 states containing 723 apartment units. Average occupancy of the Project Partnerships was 93% at December 31, 2001.

  Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships decreased from $ 115,544 for the year ended March 31, 2000 to $76,493 for the year ended March 31, 2001 and to $43,931 for the year ended March 31, 2002. As presented in Note 5, Gateway's share of net loss decreased from $716,618 for the year ended March 31,2000 to $611,603 for the year ended March 31,2001 and increased to $706,233 for the year ended March 31,2002. Suspended Losses decreased from $601,074 for the year ended March 31, 2000 to $535,110 for the year ended March 31, 2001 and increased to $662,302 for the year ended March 31, 2002. These losses would reduce the investment in Project Partnerships below zero. In general, it is common in the real estate industry to experience losses for financial and tax reporting purposes because of the non-cash expenses of depreciation and amortization. (These Project Partnerships reported depreciation and amortization of $897,242, $893,266 and $865,003 for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000, and 2001 re spectively.) As a result, management expects that this Series, as well as those described below, will report its equity in Project Partnerships as a loss for tax and financial reporting purposes. Overall, management believes the Project Partnerships are operating as expected and are generating tax credits which meet projections.

  At March 31, 2002, the Series had $235,805 of short-term investments (Cash and Cash Equivalents). It also had $261,841 in Zero Coupon Treasuries with annual maturities providing $56,105 in fiscal year 2003 increasing to $66,285 in fiscal year 2007. Management believes the sources of funds are sufficient to meet current and ongoing operating costs for the foreseeable future, and to pay part of the Asset Management Fee.

  As disclosed on the statement of cash flows, the Series had a net loss of $99,198 for the year ending March 31, 2002. However, after adjusting for Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships of $43,931 and the changes in operating assets and liabilities, net cash used in operating activities was $17,511, of which $34,981 was the Asset Management Fee actually paid. Cash provided by investing activities totaled $39,388, consisting of $12,460 in cash distributions from the Project Partnerships and $26,928 from matured Zero Coupon Treasuries. There were no unusual events or trends to describe.

  Series 3 - Gateway closed this series on December 13, 1990 after receiving $5,456,000 from 398 Assignees. As of March 31, 2002 the series had invested $3,888,713 in 23 Project Partnerships located in 12 states containing 768 apartment units. Average occupancy of the Project Partnerships was 94% as of December 31, 2001.

  Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships decreased from $ 114,700 for the year ended March 31, 2000 to $26,094 for the year ended March 31, 2001 and increased to $34,441 for the year ended March 31, 2002. As presented in Note 5, Gateway's share of net loss decreased from $988,019 for the year ended March 31,2000 to $735,412 for the year ended March 31,2001 and to $710,345 for the year ended March 31,2002. Suspended Losses decreased from $873,319 for the year ended March 31, 2000 to $709,318 for the year ended March 31, 2001 and to $675,904 for the year ended March 31, 2002. These losses would reduce the investment in Project Partnerships below zero. (These Project Partnerships reported depreciation and amortization of $1,213,599, $941,538 and $946,476 for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively.) Overall, management believes these Project Partnerships are operating as expected and are generating tax credits which meet projections.

  At March 31, 2002, the Series had $198,028 of short-term investments (Cash and Cash Equivalents). It also had $232,901 in Zero Coupon Treasuries with annual maturities providing $49,888 in fiscal year 2003 increasing to $58,940 in fiscal year 2007. Management believes these sources of funds are sufficient to meet the Series' current and ongoing operating costs for the foreseeable future, and to pay part of the Asset Management Fee.

  As disclosed on the statement of cash flows, the Series had a net loss of $80,062 for the year ended March 31, 2002. However, after adjusting for Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships of $34,441 and the changes in operating assets and liabilities, net cash used in operating activities was $24,505, of which $37,164 was the Asset Management Fee actually paid. Cash provided by investing activities totaled $44,918, consisting of $20,966 in cash distributions received from the Project Partnerships and $23,952 from matured Zero Coupon Treasuries. There were no unusual events or trends to describe.

  Series 4 - Gateway closed this series on May 31, 1991 after receiving $6,915,000 from 465 Assignees. As of March 31, 2002, the series had invested $4,952,519 in 29 Project Partnerships located in 16 states containing 879 apartment units. Average occupancy of the Project Partnerships was 96% at December 31, 2001.

  Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships increased from $175,823 for the year ended March 31, 2000 to $254,163 for the year ended March 31, 2001 and decreased to $118,314 for the year ended March 31, 2002. As presented in Note 5, Gateway's share of net loss increased from $704,086 for the year ended March 31,2000 to $847,148 for the year ended March 31,2001 and decreased to $766,057 for the year ended March 31,2002. Suspended Losses increased from $528,263 for the year ended March 31, 2000 to $592,985 for the year ended March 31, 2001 and to $647,743 for the year ended March 31,2002. These losses would reduce the investment in Project Partnerships below zero. (These Project Partnerships reported depreciation and amortization of $983,083, $976,176 and $979,666 for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively.) Overall, management believes these Project Partnerships are operating as expected and are generating tax credits which meet projections.

  At March 31, 2002, the Series had $272,179 of short-term investments (Cash and Cash Equivalents). It also had $295,063 in Zero Coupon Treasuries with annual maturities providing $63,227 in fiscal year 2003 increasing to $74,700 in fiscal year 2007. Management believes these sources of funds are sufficient to meet the Series' current and ongoing operating costs for the foreseeable future, and to pay part of the Asset Management Fee.

  As disclosed on the statement of cash flows, the Series had a net loss of $185,366 for the year ended March 31, 2002. However, after adjusting for Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships of $118,314 and the changes in operating assets and liabilities, net cash used in operating activities was $27,548, of which $44,751 was the Asset Management Fee actually paid. Cash provided by investing activities totaled $50,236, consisting of $19,892 in cash distributions from the Project Partnerships and $30,344 from matured Zero Coupon Treasuries. There were no unusual events or trends to describe.

Series 5 - Gateway closed this series on October 11, 1991 after receiving $8,616,000 from 535 Assignees. As of March 31, 2002, the series had invested $6,164,472 in 36 Project Partnerships located in 13 states containing 1,106 apartment units. Average occupancy of the Project Partnerships was 97% as of December 31, 2001.

  Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships were comparable for the years ended March 31, 2000, 2001, and 2002. (These Project Partnerships reported depreciation and amortization of $1,286,201, $1,283,498 and $1,294,116 for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively.) Overall, management believes these Project Partnerships are operating as expected and are generating tax credits which meet projections.

  At March 31, 2002, the Series had $380,377 of short-term investments (Cash and Cash Equivalents). It also had $367,758 in Zero Coupon Treasuries with annual maturities providing $78,780 in fiscal year 2003 increasing to $93,075 in fiscal year 2007. Management believes these sources of funds are sufficient to meet the Series' current and ongoing operating costs for the foreseeable future, and to pay part of the Asset Management Fee.

  As disclosed on the statement of cash flows, the Series had a net loss of $268,277 for the year ended March 31, 2002. However, after adjusting for Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships of $189,327 and the changes in operating assets and liabilities, net cash used in operating activities was $37,473, of which $60,518 was the Asset Management Fee actually paid. Cash provided by investing activities totaled $66,996 consisting of $29,176 in cash distributions from the Project Partnerships and $37,820 from matured Zero Coupon Treasuries. There were no unusual events or trends to describe.

  Series 6 - Gateway closed this series on March 11, 1992 after receiving $10,105,000 from 625 Assignees. As of March 31, 2002, the series had invested $7,462,215 in 38 Project Partnerships located in 19 states containing 1,086 apartment units. Average occupancy of the Project Partnerships was 95% as of December 31, 2001.

  Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships decreased from $433,957 for the year ended March 31, 2000 to $384,730 for the year ended March 31, 2001 and to $306,042 for the year ended March 31, 2002. These decreases were due to additional suspended losses of $430,306, $523,064, and $609,347 for the years ended March 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002 respectively, as these losses would reduce the investment in certain Project Partnerships below zero. (These Project Partnerships reported depreciation and amortization of $1,371,839, $1,337,714 and $1,347,661 for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively.) Overall, management believes these Project Partnerships are operating as expected and are generating tax credits which meet projections.

  At March 31, 2002, the Series had $455,377 of short-term investments (Cash and Cash Equivalents). It also had $304,209 in Zero Coupon Treasuries with annual maturities providing $66,000 in fiscal year 2003 increasing to $83,000 in fiscal year 2007. Management believes these sources of funds are sufficient to meet the Series' current and ongoing operating costs for the foreseeable future, and to pay part of the Asset Management Fee.

  As disclosed on the statement of cash flows, the Series had a net loss of $407,763 for the year ended March 31, 2002. However, after adjusting for Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships of $306,042 and the changes in operating assets and liabilities, net cash used in operating activities was $45,330, of which $57,881 was the Asset Management Fee actually paid. Cash provided by investing activities totaled $63,071 of which $30,012 was received in cash distributions from the Project Partnerships and $33,059 from matured Zero Coupon Treasuries. There were no unusual events or trends to describe.
  
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


 

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT



To the Partners of Gateway Tax Credit Fund II Ltd.


   We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of each of the five Series (Series 2 through 6) constituting Gateway Tax Credit Fund II Ltd. (a Florida Limited Partnership) as of March 31, 2002 and 2001 and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows of each of the five Series for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2002.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of certain Project Partnerships for which cumulative equity in losses included on the balance sheets as of March 31, 2002 and 2001 and net losses included on the statements of operations for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2002 are:

   

Cumulative Equity in Losses
March 31,
- --------


Partnership Loss
Year Ended March 31,
- --------------------

     

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

               

Series 2

   

$3,763,013

$3,733,616

$ 29,397

$ 57,696

$ 92,023

Series 3

   

3,126,202

3,114,487

11,713

13,173

79,587

Series 4

   

3,360,237

3,303,187

57,051

176,447

130,892

Series 5

   

3,680,345

3,600,697

79,648

92,712

83,458

Series 6

   

4,418,917

4,237,605

181,311

242,250

276,688

   Those statements were audited by other auditors whose reports have been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for such underlying partnerships, is based solely on the reports of the other auditors.

    We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the reports of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

    In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of other auditors, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of each of the five Series (Series 2 through 6) constituting Gateway Tax Credit Fund II Ltd. as of March 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

    Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The schedules listed under Item 14(a)(2) in the index are presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and are not part of the basic financial statements. These schedules have been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of other auditors, fairly state in all material respects the financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

                                         /s/ Spence, Marston, Bunch, Morris & Co.
                                         SPENCE, MARSTON, BUNCH, MORRIS & CO.
                                         Certified Public Accountants


Clearwater, Florida
June 20, 2002


PART I - Financial Information
  Item 1.  Financial Statements

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
MARCH 31, 2002 AND 2001

SERIES 2

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

 

ASSETS
Current Assets:
 Cash and Cash Equivalents
 Investments in Securities

  Total Current Assets

 Investments in Securities
 Investments in Project Partnerships, Net

    Total Assets

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
 Payable to General Partners

  Total Current Liabilities

Long-Term Liabilities:
 Payable to General Partners

Partners' Equity (deficit):
Assignor Limited Partner
 Units of limited partnership interest consisting of 40,000 authorized BAC's, of which Series 2 had 6,136 at March 31, 2002 and 2001 have been issued to the assignees
Assignees
 Units of beneficial interest of the limited partnership interest of the assignor limited partner, $1,000 stated value per BAC, Series 2 had 6,136 at March 31, 2002 and 2001, issued and outstanding
General Partners

  Total Partners' Equity

    Total Liabilities and Partners' Equity



$ 235,805 
56,098 
- ----------
291,903 

205,743 
78,301
- ----------
$ 575,947 
==========


$  54,118 
- ----------
54,118 

- ----------
429,262 
- ----------











145,441 
(52,874)
- ----------
92,567 
- ----------
$ 575,947 
==========



$ 213,928 
53,836 
- ----------
267,764 

242,459 
124,529 
- ----------
$ 634,752 
==========


$  46,941 
- ----------
46,941 
- ----------

396,046 
- ----------











243,647 
(51,882)
- ----------
191,765 
- ----------
$ 634,752 
==========

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
MARCH 31, 2002 AND 2001

SERIES 3

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

 

ASSETS
Current Assets:
 Cash and Cash Equivalents
 Investments in Securities

  Total Current Assets

 Investments in Securities
 Investments in Project Partnerships, Net

    Total Assets

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
 Payable to General Partners

  Total Current Liabilities

Long-Term Liabilities:
 Payable to General Partners

Partners' Equity (deficit):
Assignor Limited Partner
 Units of limited partnership interest consisting of 40,000 authorized BAC's, of which Series 3 had 5,456 at March 31, 2002 and 2001 have been issued to the assignees
Assignees
 Units of beneficial interest of the limited partnership interest of the assignor limited partner, $1,000 stated value per BAC, Series 3 had 5,456 at March 31, 2002 and 2001, issued and outstanding
General Partners

  Total Partners' Equity

    Total Liabilities and Partners' Equity



$ 198,028 
49,898 
- ----------
247,926 

183,003 
34,601 
- ----------
$ 465,530 
==========


$  58,717 
- ----------
58,717 
- ----------

319,290 
- ----------











134,464 
(46,941)
- ----------
87,523 
- ----------
$ 465,530 
==========



$ 177,615 
47,886 
- ---------
225,501 

215,662 
71,138 
- ----------
$ 512,301 
==========


$  51,154 
- ----------
51,154 
- ----------

293,562 
- ----------











213,725 
(46,140)
- ----------
167,585 
- ----------
$ 512,301 
==========

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
MARCH 31, 2002 AND 2001

SERIES 4

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

 

ASSETS
Current Assets:
 Cash and Cash Equivalents
 Investments in Securities

  Total Current Assets

 Investments in Securities
 Investments in Project Partnerships, Net

    Total Assets

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
 Payable to General Partners

  Total Current Liabilities

Long-Term Liabilities:
 Payable to General Partners

Partners' Equity (deficit):
Assignor Limited Partner
 Units of limited partnership interest consisting of 40,000 authorized BAC's, of which Series 4 had 6,915 at March 31, 2002 and 2001 have been issued to the assignees
Assignees
 Units of beneficial interest of the limited partnership interest of the assignor limited partner, $1,000 stated value per BAC, Series 4 had 6,915 at March 31, 2002 and 2001, issued and outstanding
General Partners

  Total Partners' Equity

    Total Liabilities and Partners' Equity



$  272,179 
63,215 
- -----------
335,394 

231,848 
96,741 
- -----------
$  663,983 
===========


$   66,364 
- -----------
66,364 
- -----------

415,676 
- -----------











240,778 
(58,835)
- ----------
181,943 
- ----------
$  663,983 
===========



$  249,491 
60,666 
- -----------
310,157 

273,223 
223,689 
- -----------
$  807,069 
===========


$   56,807 
- ----------
56,807 
- ----------

382,953 
- ----------











424,290 
(56,981)
- -----------
367,309 
- -----------
$  807,069 
===========

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
MARCH 31, 2002 AND 2001

SERIES 5

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

 

ASSETS
Current Assets:
 Cash and Cash Equivalents
 Investments in Securities

  Total Current Assets

 Investments in Securities
 Investments in Project Partnerships, Net

    Total Assets

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
 Payable to General Partners

  Total Current Liabilities

Long-Term Liabilities:
 Payable to General Partners

Partners' Equity (deficit):
Assignor Limited Partner
 Units of limited partnership interest consisting of 40,000 authorized BAC's, of which Series 5 had 8,616 at March 31, 2002 and 2001 have been issued to the assignees
Assignees
 Units of beneficial interest of the limited partnership interest of the assignor limited partner, $1,000 stated value per BAC, Series 5 had 8,616 at March 31, 2002 and 2001, issued and outstanding
General Partners

  Total Partners' Equity

   Total Liabilities and Partners' Equity



$  380,377 
78,790 
- -----------
459,167 

288,968 
550,146 
- -----------
$1,298,281 
===========


$   87,779 
- -----------
87,779 
- -----------

417,637 
- -----------











860,560 
(67,695)
- -----------
792,865 
- -----------
$1,298,281 
===========



$  350,854 
75,613 
- -----------
426,467 

340,537 
752,227 
- -----------
$1,519,231 
===========


$   75,689 
- -----------
75,689 
- -----------

382,400 
- -----------











1,126,154 
(65,012)
- -----------
1,061,142 
- -----------
$1,519,231 
===========

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
MARCH 31, 2002 AND 2001

SERIES 6

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

 

ASSETS
Current Assets:
 Cash and Cash Equivalents
 Investments in Securities

  Total Current Assets

 Investments in Securities
 Investments in Project Partnerships, Net

    Total Assets

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
 Payable to General Partners

  Total Current Liabilities

Long-Term Liabilities:
 Payable to General Partners

Partners' Equity (deficit):
Assignor Limited Partner
 Units of limited partnership interest consisting of 40,000 authorized BAC's, of which Series 6 had 10,105 at March 31, 2002 and 2001 have been issued to the assignees
Assignees
 Units of beneficial interest of the limited partnership interest of the assignor limited partner, $1,000 stated value per BAC, Series 6 had 10,105 at March 31, 2002 and 2001, issued and outstanding
General Partners

  Total Partners' Equity

    Total Liabilities and Partners' Equity



$  455,377 
62,622 
- -----------
517,999 

241,587 
1,257,026 
- -----------
$2,016,612 
===========


$   83,891 
- -----------
83,891 
- -----------

536,157 
- -----------











1,471,324 
(74,760)
- -----------
1,396,564 
- -----------
$2,016,612 
===========



$  437,636 
58,858 
- -----------
496,494 

282,893 
1,584,877 
- -----------
$2,364,264 
===========


$   71,653 
- -----------
71,653 
- -----------

488,284 
- -----------











1,875,009 
(70,682)
- -----------
1,804,327 
- -----------
$2,364,264 
===========

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
MARCH 31, 2002 AND 2001

TOTAL SERIES 2 - 6

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

 

ASSETS
Current Assets:
 Cash and Cash Equivalents
 Investments in Securities

  Total Current Assets

 Investments in Securities
 Investments in Project Partnerships, Net

    Total Assets

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
 Payable to General Partners

  Total Current Liabilities

Long-Term Liabilities:
 Payable to General Partners

Partners' Equity (deficit):
Assignor Limited Partner
 Units of limited partnership interest consisting of 40,000 authorized BAC's, of which Series 2-6 had 37,228 at March 31, 2002 and 2001 have been issued to the assignees
Assignees
 Units of beneficial interest of the limited partnership interest of the assignor limited partner, $1,000 stated value per BAC, Series 2-6 had 37,228 at March 31, 2002 and 2001, issued and outstanding
General Partners

  Total Partners' Equity

    Total Liabilities and Partners' Equity



$1,541,766 
310,623 
- -----------
1,852,389 

1,151,149 
2,016,815 
- -----------
$5,020,353 
===========


$  350,869 
- -----------
350,869 
- -----------

2,118,022 
- -----------











2,852,567 
(301,105)
- -----------
2,551,462 
- -----------
$5,020,353 
===========



$1,429,524 
296,859 
- -----------
1,726,383 

1,354,774 
2,756,460 
- -----------
$5,837,617 
===========


$  302,244 
- -----------
302,244 
- -----------

1,943,245 
- -----------











3,882,825 
(290,697)
- -----------
3,592,128 
- -----------
$5,837,617 
===========

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,

SERIES 2

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

Revenues:
 Interest Income
 Other Income

  Total Revenues

Expenses:
 Asset Management Fee-General Partner
 General and Administrative:
  General Partner
  Other
 Amortization

  Total Expenses

Loss Before Equity in Losses
 of Project Partnerships
Equity in Losses of Project
 Partnerships

Net Loss

Allocation of Net Loss:
 Assignees
 General Partners



Net Loss Per Beneficial
Assignee Certificate
Number of Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding


$   25,806 
10,860 
- -----------
36,666 
- -----------

68,197 

11,737 
11,302 
697 
- -----------
91,933 
- -----------

(55,267)

(43,931)
- -----------
$  (99,198)
===========

$  (98,206)
(992)
- -----------
$  (99,198)
===========

$   (16.00)
===========
6,136 
===========


$   34,132 
8,982 
- -----------
43,114 
- -----------

68,361 

9,149 
10,886 
1,801 
- -----------
90,197 
- -----------

(47,083)

(76,493)
- -----------
$ (123,576)
===========

$ (122,340)
(1,236)
- -----------
$ (123,576)
===========

$   (19.94)
===========
6,136 
===========


$   33,028 
7,170 
- -----------
40,198 
- -----------

68,511 

8,181 
11,237 
3,263 
- -----------
91,192 
- -----------

(50,994)

(115,544)
- -----------
$ (166,538)
===========

$ (164,873)
(1,665)
- -----------
$ (166,538)
===========

$   (26.87)
===========
6,136 
===========

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,

Series 3

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

Revenues:
 Interest Income
 Other Income

  Total Revenues

Expenses:
 Asset Management Fee-General Partner
 General and Administrative:
  General Partner
  Other
 Amortization

  Total Expenses

Loss Before Equity in Losses
 of Project Partnerships
Equity in Losses of Project
 Partnerships

Net Loss

Allocation of Net Loss:
 Assignees
 General Partners



Net Loss Per Beneficial
Assignee Certificate
Number of Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding


$  22,536 
19,990 
- ----------
42,526 
- ----------

62,892 

12,271 
11,864 
1,120 
- ----------
88,147 
- ----------

(45,621)

(34,441)
- ----------
$ (80,062)
==========

$ (79,261)
(801)
- ----------
$ (80,062)
==========

$  (14.53)
==========
5,456 
==========


$  29,545 
22,840 
- ----------
52,385 
- ----------

63,104 

9,565 
11,179 
1,120 
- ----------
84,968 
- ----------

(32,583)

(26,094)
- ----------
$ (58,677)
==========

$ (58,090)
(587)
- ----------
$ (58,677)
==========

$  (10.65)
==========
5,456 
==========


$  28,740 
22,645 
- ----------
51,385 
- ----------

63,301 

8,552 
10,780 
1,120 
- ----------
83,753 
- ----------

(32,368)

(114,700)
- ----------
$(147,068)
==========

$(145,597)
(1,471)
- ----------
$(147,068)
==========

$  (26.69)
==========
5,456 
==========

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,

SERIES 4

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

Revenues:
 Interest Income
 Other Income

  Total Revenues

Expenses:
 Asset Management Fee - General Partner
 General and Administrative:
  General Partner
  Other
 Amortization

  Total Expenses

Loss Before Equity in Losses
 of Project Partnerships
Equity in Losses of Project
 Partnerships

Net Loss

Allocation of Net Loss:
 Assignees
 General Partners



Net Loss Per Beneficial
Assignee Certificate
Number of Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding


$  29,219 
15,207 
- ---------
44,426 
- ---------

77,474 

15,471 
14,584 
3,949 
- ---------
111,478 
- ---------

(67,052)

(118,314)
- ---------
$(185,366)
==========

$(183,512)
(1,854)
- ---------
$(185,366)
==========

$  (26.54)
==========
6,915 
==========


$  38,975 
12,170 
- ---------
51,145 
- ---------

77,661 

12,060 
13,636 
5,288 
- ---------
108,645 
- ---------

(57,500)

(254,163)
- ----------
$(311,663)
==========

$(308,546)
(3,117)
- ----------
$(311,663)
==========

$  (44.62)
==========
6,915 
==========


$  37,964 
11,033 
- ---------
48,997 
- ---------

77,832 

10,779 
13,398 
6,656 
- ---------
108,665 
- ---------

(59,668)

(175,823)
- ----------
$(235,491)
==========

$(233,136)
(2,355)
- ----------
$(235,491)
==========

$  (33.71)
==========
6,915 
==========

       

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,

SERIES 5

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

Revenues:
 Interest Income
 Other Income

  Total Revenues

Expenses:
 Asset Management Fee - General Partner
 General and Administrative:
  General Partner
  Other
 Amortization

  Total Expenses

Loss Before Equity in Losses
 of Project Partnerships
Equity in Losses of Project
 Partnerships

Net Loss

Allocation of Net Loss:
 Assignees
 General Partners



Net Loss Per Beneficial
Assignee Certificate
Number of Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding


$ 37,335 
21,532 
- ----------
58,867 
- ----------

95,755 

19,205 
17,747 
5,110 
- ----------
137,817 
- ----------

(78,950)

(189,327)
- ----------
$(268,277)
==========

$(265,594)
(2,683)
- ----------
$(268,277)
==========

$  (30.83)
=========
8,616 
==========


$  50,345 
13,899 
- ----------
64,244 
- ----------

96,008 

14,972 
16,520 
5,110 
- ----------
132,610 
- ----------

(68,366)

(179,765)
- ----------
$(248,131)
==========

$(245,650)
(2,481)
- ----------
$(248,131)
==========

$  (28.51)
==========
8,616 
==========


$  48,721 
17,118 
- ----------
65,839 
- ----------

96,241 

13,386 
15,895 
6,159 
- ----------
131,681 
- ----------

(65,842)

(178,140)
- ----------
$(243,982)
==========

$(241,542)
(2,440)
- ----------
$(243,982)
==========

$  (28.03)
==========
8,616 
==========

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,

SERIES 6

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

Revenues:
 Interest Income
 Other Income

  Total Revenues

Expenses:
 Asset Management Fee - General Partner
 General and Administrative:
  General Partner
  Other
 Amortization

  Total Expenses

Loss Before Equity in Losses
 of Project Partnerships
Equity in Losses of Project
 Partnerships

Net Loss

Allocation of Net Loss:
 Assignees
 General Partners



Net Loss Per Beneficial
Assignee Certificate
Number of Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding


$  35,129 
17,654 
- ----------
52,783 
- ----------

105,753 

20,272 
19,028 
9,451 
- ----------
154,504 
- ----------

(101,721)

(306,042)
- ----------
$(407,763)
==========

$(403,685)
(4,078)
- ----------
$(407,763)
==========

$  (39.95)
==========
10,105 
==========


$  48,609 
8,932 
- ----------
57,541 
- ----------

106,125 

15,803 
18,600 
13,314 
- ----------
153,842 
- ----------

(96,301)

(384,730)
- ----------
$(481,031)
==========

$(476,221)
(4,810)
- ----------
$(481,031)
==========

$  (47.13)
==========
10,105 
==========


$  46,177 
8,057 
- ----------
54,234 
- ----------

106,486 

14,130 
16,986 
14,982 
- ----------
152,584 
- ----------

(98,350)

(433,597)
- ----------
$(531,947)
==========

$(526,628)
(5,319)
- ----------
$(531,947)
==========

$  (52.12)
==========
10,105 
==========

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,

TOTAL SERIES 2 - 6

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

Revenues:
 Interest Income
 Other Income

  Total Revenues

Expenses:
 Asset Management Fee-General Partner
 General and Administrative:
  General Partner
  Other
 Amortization

  Total Expenses

Loss Before Equity in Losses
 of Project Partnerships
Equity in Losses of Project
 Partnerships

Net Loss

Allocation of Net Loss:
 Assignees
 General Partners


$  150,025 
85,243 
- -----------
235,268 
- -----------

410,071 

78,956 
74,525 
20,327 
- -----------
583,879 
- -----------

(348,611)

(692,055)
- -----------
$(1,040,666)
============

$(1,030,258)
(10,408)
- ------------
$(1,040,666)
============


$  201,606 
66,823 
- -----------
268,429 
- -----------

411,259 

61,549 
70,821 
26,633 
- -----------
570,262 
- -----------

(301,833)

(921,245)
- -----------
$(1,223,078)
============

$(1,210,847)
(12,231)
- ------------
$(1,223,078)
============


$  194,630 
66,023 
- -----------
260,653 
- -----------

412,371 

55,028 
68,296 
32,180 
- -----------
567,875 
- -----------

(307,222)

(1,017,804)
- -----------
$(1,325,026)
============

$(1,311,776)
(13,250)
- ------------
$(1,325,026)
============

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:

SERIES 2


Assignees
- ---------

General
Partners
- --------


Total
- -----



Balance at March 31, 1999

Net Loss


Balance at March 31, 2000

Net Loss


Balance at March 31, 2001

Net Loss


Balance at March 31, 2002



$ 530,860 

(164,873)
- -----------

365,987 

(122,340)
- -----------

243,647 

(98,206)
- -----------

$ 145,441 
===========



$  (48,981)

(1,665)
- -----------

(50,646)

(1,236)
- -----------

(51,882)

(992)
- -----------

$  (52,874)
===========



$  481,879 

(166,538)
- -----------

315,341 

(123,576)
- -----------

191,765 

(99,198)
- -----------

$  92,567 
===========

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:

SERIES 3


Assignees
- ---------

General
Partners
- --------


Total
- -----



Balance at March 31, 1999

Net Loss


Balance at March 31, 2000

Net Loss


Balance at March 31, 2001

Net Loss


Balance at March 31, 2002



$  417,412 

(145,597)
- -----------

271,815 

(58,090)
- -----------

213,725 

(79,261)
- -----------

$  134,464 
===========



$   (44,082)

(1,471)
- ------------

(45,553)

(587)
- ------------

(46,140)

(801)
- ------------

$   (46,941)
============



$  373,330 

(147,068)
- -----------

226,262 

(58,677)
- -----------

167,585 

(80,062)
- -----------

$   87,523 
===========

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:

SERIES 4


Assignees
- ---------

General
Partners
- --------


Total
- -----



Balance at March 31, 1999

Net Loss


Balance at March 31, 2000

Net Loss


Balance at March 31, 2001

Net Loss


Balance at March 31, 2002



$  965,972 

(233,136)
- -----------

732,836 

(308,546)
- -----------

424,290 

(183,512)
- -----------

$  240,778 
===========



$ (51,509)

(2,355)
- ----------

(53,864)

(3,117)
- ----------

(56,981)

(1,854)
- ----------

$ (58,835)
==========



$   914,463 

(235,491)
- ------------

678,972 

(311,663)
- ------------

367,309 

(185,366)
- ------------

$    181,943 
============

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:

SERIES 5


Assignees
- ---------

General
Partners
- --------


Total
- -----



Balance at March 31, 1999

Net Loss


Balance at March 31, 2000

Net Loss


Balance at March 31, 2001

Net Loss


Balance at March 31, 2002



$1,613,346 

(241,542)
- ------------

1,371,804 

(245,650)
- ------------

1,126,154 

(265,594)
- ------------

$  860,560 
============



$  (60,091)

(2,440)
- -----------

(62,531)

(2,481)
- -----------

(65,012)

(2,683)
- -----------

$  (67,695)
===========



$1,553,255 

(243,982)
- ------------

1,309,273 

(248,131)
- ------------

1,061,142 

(268,277)
- ------------

$  792,865 
============

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:

SERIES 6


Assignees
- ---------

General
Partners
- --------


Total
- -----



Balance at March 31, 1999

Net Loss


Balance at March 31, 2000

Net Loss


Balance at March 31, 2001

Net Loss


Balance at March 31, 2002



$ 2,877,858 

(526,628)
- ------------

2,351,230 

(476,221)
- ------------

1,875,009 

(403,685)
- ------------

$ 1,471,324 
============



$  (60,553)

(5,319)
- -----------

(65,872)

(4,810)
- -----------

(70,682)

(4,078)
- -----------

$  (74,760)
===========



$ 2,817,305 

(531,947)
- ------------

2,285,358 

(481,031)
- ------------

1,804,327 

(407,763)
- ------------

$ 1,396,564 
============

       

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:


TOTAL SERIES 2 - 6


Assignees
- ---------

General
Partners
- --------


Total
- -----



Balance at March 31, 1999

Net Loss


Balance at March 31, 2000

Net Loss


Balance at March 31, 2001

Net Loss


Balance at March 31, 2002



$ 6,405,448 

(1,311,776)
- ------------

5,093,672 

(1,210,847)
- ------------

3,882,825 

(1,030,258)
- ------------

$ 2,852,567 
============



$ (265,216)

(13,250)
- -----------

(278,466)

(12,231)
- -----------

(290,697)

(10,408)
- -----------

$ (301,105)
===========



$ 6,140,232 

(1,325,026)
- ------------

4,815,206 

(1,223,078)
- ------------

3,592,128 

(1,040,666)
- ------------

$ 2,551,462 
============

       

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:

SERIES 2
- --------

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
  Net Loss
  Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss   to Net Cash Used in Operating   Activities:
    Amortization
    Accreted Interest Income on
    Investments in Securities
    Equity in Losses of Project
    Partnerships
    Interest Income from
    Redemption of Securities
    Distributions Included in
    Other Income
    Changes in Operating Assets
    and Liabilities:
      Increase in Payable to
      General Partners

        Net Cash Used in
        Operating Activities

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
  Distributions Received from
  Project Partnerships
  Redemption of Investment in
  Securities

        Net Cash Provided by
        Investing Activities

Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents at
Beginning of Year

Cash and Cash Equivalents at
End of Year


$(99,198)



697 

(19,381)

43,931 

26,907 

(10,860)



40,393 
- ----------

(17,511)
- ----------


12,460 

26,928 
- ----------

39,388 
- ----------
21,877 

213,928 
- ----------

$ 235,805 
==========


$(123,576)



1,801 

(21,814)

76,493 

23,537 

(8,982)



35,262 
- ----------

(17,279)
- ----------


14,374 

28,263 
- ----------

42,637 
- ----------
25,358 

188,570 
- ----------

$ 213,928 
==========


$(166,538)



3,263 

(23,854)

115,544 

20,241 

(7,170)



36,547 
- ----------

(21,967)
- ----------


11,727 

29,297 
- ----------

41,024 
- ----------
19,057 

169,513 
- ----------

$ 188,570 
==========

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:

SERIES 3
- -------

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
  Net Loss
  Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss   to Net Cash Used in Operating   Activities:
    Amortization
    Accreted Interest Income on
    Investments in Securities
    Equity in Losses of Project
    Partnerships
    Interest Income from
    Redemption of Securities
    Distributions Included In
    Other Income
    Changes in Operating Assets
    and Liabilities:
      Increase in Payable to
      General Partners

        Net Cash Used in
        Operating Activities

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
  Distributions Received from
  Project Partnerships
  Redemption of Investment
  in Securities

        Net Cash Provided by
        Investing Activities

Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents at
Beginning of Year

Cash and Cash Equivalents at
End of Year


$ (80,062)



1,120 

(17,239)

34,441 

23,934 

(19,990)



33,291 
- ----------

(24,505)
- ----------


20,966 

23,952 
- ----------

44,918 
- ----------
20,413 

177,615 
- ----------

$ 198,028 
==========


$ (58,677)



1,120 

(19,403)

26,094 

20,936 

(22,840)



25,081 
- ----------

(27,689)
- ----------


24,678 

25,139 
- ----------

49,817 
- ----------
22,128 

155,487 
- ----------

$ 177,615 
==========


$(147,068)



1,120 

(21,218)

114,700 

18,004 

(22,645)



10,980 
- ----------

(34,008)
- ----------


25,455 

26,059 
- ----------

51,514 
- ----------
17,506 

137,981 
- ----------

$ 155,487 
==========

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:

SERIES 4
- --------

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
  Net Loss
  Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss   to Net Cash Used in Operating   Activities:
    Amortization
    Accreted Interest Income on
    Investments in Securities
    Equity in Losses of Project
    Partnerships
    Interest Income from
    Redemption of Securities
    Distributions Included In
    Other Income
    Changes in Operating Assets
    and Liabilities:
      Increase in Payable to
      General Partners

         Net Cash Used in
         Operating Activities

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
  Distributions Received from
  Project Partnerships
  Redemption of Investment in
  Securities

        Net Cash Provided by
        Investing Activities

Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents at
Beginning of Year

Cash and Cash Equivalents at
End of Year


$(185,366)



3,949 

(21,840)

118,314 

30,322 

(15,207)



42,280 
- ----------

(27,548)
- ----------


19,892 

30,344 
- ----------

50,236 
- ----------
22,688 

249,491 
- ----------

$ 272,179 
==========


$(311,663)



5,288 

(24,581)

254,163 

26,523 

(12,170)



36,712 
- ----------

(25,728)
- ----------


16,722 

31,849 
- ----------

48,571 
- ----------
22,843 

226,648 
- ----------

$ 249,491 
==========


$(235,491)



6,656 

(26,881)

175,823 

22,808 

(11,033)



36,909 
- ----------

(31,209)
- ----------


17,210 

33,015 
- ----------

50,225 
- ----------
19,016 

207,632 
- ----------

$ 226,648 
==========

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:

SERIES 5
- --------

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
  Net Loss
  Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss   to Net Cash Used in Operating   Activities:
    Amortization
    Accreted Interest Income on
    Investments in Securities
    Equity in Losses of Project
    Partnerships
    Interest Income from
    Redemption of Securities
    Distributions Included In
    Other Income
    Changes in Operating Assets
    and Liabilities:
      Increase in Payable to
      General Partners

        Net Cash Used in Operating
        Activities

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
  Distributions Received from
  Project Partnerships
  Redemption of Investment in
  Securities

        Net Cash Provided by
        Investing Activities

Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents at
Beginning of Year

Cash and Cash Equivalents at
End of Year


$(268,277)



5,110 

(27,221)

189,327 

37,793 

(21,532)



47,327 
- ----------

(37,473)
- ----------


29,176 

37,820 
- ----------

66,996 
- ----------
29,523 

350,854 
- ----------

$ 380,377 
==========


$(248,131)



5,110 

(30,637)

179,765 

33,057 

(13,899)



38,940 
- ----------

(35,795)
- ----------


28,246 

39,696 
- ----------

67,942 
- ----------
32,147 

318,707 
- ----------

$ 350,854 
==========


$(243,982)



6,159 

(33,503)

178,140 

28,428 

(17,118)



39,490 
- ----------

(42,386)
- ----------


26,951 

41,148 
- ----------

68,099 
- ----------
25,713 

292,994 
- ----------

$ 318,707 
==========

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:

SERIES 6
- -------

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
  Net Loss
  Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss   to Net Cash Used in Operating   Activities:
    Amortization
    Accreted Interest Income on
    Investments in Securities
    Equity in Losses of Project
    Partnerships
    Interest Income from
    Redemption of Securities
    Distributions Included In
    Other Income
    Changes in Operating Assets
    and Liabilities:
      Increase in Payable to
      General Partners

        Net Cash Used in Operating
        Activities

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
  Distributions Received from
  Project Partnerships
  Redemption of Investment in
  Securities

        Net Cash Provided by
        Investing Activities

Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents at
Beginning of Year

Cash and Cash Equivalents at
End of Year


$(407,763)



9,451 

(24,458)

306,042 

28,941 

(17,654)



60,111 
- ----------

(45,330)
- ----------


30,012 

33,059 
- ----------

63,071 
- ----------
17,741 

437,636 
- ----------

$ 455,377 
==========


$(481,031)



13,314 

(26,573)

384,730 

24,290 

(8,932)



51,927 
- ----------

(42,275)
- ----------


23,401 

33,710 
- ----------

57,111 
- ----------
14,836 

422,800 
- ----------

$ 437,636 
==========


$(531,947)



14,982 

(28,202)

433,597 

20,134 

(8,057)



52,581 
- ----------

(46,912)
- ----------


26,174 

34,866 
- ----------

61,040 
- ----------
14,128 

408,672 
- ----------

$ 422,800 
==========

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000:

TOTAL SERIES 2 - 6
- ------------------

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
  Net Loss
  Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss
  to Net Cash Used in Operating   Activities:
    Amortization
    Accreted Interest Income on     Investments in Securities
    Equity in Losses of Project     Partnerships
    Interest Income from Redemption
    of Securities
    Distributions Included In Other
    Income
    Changes in Operating Assets and     Liabilities:
      Increase in Payable to
      General Partners

        Net Cash Used in Operating
        Activities

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
  Distributions Received from
  Project Partnerships
  Redemption of Investment in
  Securities

         Net Cash Provided by
         Investing Activities

Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents at
Beginning of Year

Cash and Cash Equivalents at
End of Year


$(1,040,666)



20,327 

(110,139)

692,055 

147,897 

(85,243)



223,402 
- -----------

(152,367)
- -----------


112,506 

152,103 
- -----------

264,609 
- -----------
112,242 

1,429,524 
- -----------

$ 1,541,766 
===========


$(1,223,078)



26,633 

(123,008)

921,245 

128,343 

(66,823)



187,922 
- -----------

(148,766)
- -----------


107,421 

158,657 
- -----------

266,078 
- -----------
117,312 

1,312,212 
- -----------

$1,429,524 
===========


$(1,325,026)



32,180 

(133,658)

1,017,804 

109,615 

(66,023)



188,626 
- -----------

(176,482)
- -----------


107,517 

164,385 
- -----------

271,902 
- -----------
95,420 

1,216,792 
- -----------

$1,312,212 
===========

See accompanying notes to financial statements.


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION:

  Gateway Tax Credit Fund II Ltd. ("Gateway"), a Florida Limited Partnership, was formed September 12, 1989, under the laws of Florida. Operations commenced on September 14, 1990 for Series 2, September 28, 1990 for Series 3, February 1, 1991 for Series 4, July 1, 1991 for Series 5 and January 1, 1992 for Series 6. Gateway has invested, as a limited partner, in other limited partnerships ("Project Partnerships") each of which owns and operates one or more apartment complexes expected to qualify for Low-Income Housing Tax Credits. Gateway will terminate on December 31, 2040, or sooner, in accordance with the terms of the Limited Partnership Agreement. As of March 31, 2002, Gateway had received capital contributions of $1,000 from the General Partners and $37,228,000 from Beneficial Assignee Certificate investors (the "Assignees"). The fiscal year of Gateway for reporting purposes ends on March 31.

  Pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, Gateway filed a Form S-11 Registration Statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, effective September 12, 1989, which covered the offering (the "Public Offering") of Gateway's Beneficial Assignee Certificates ("BACs") representing assignments of units for the beneficial interest of the limited partnership interest of the Assignor Limited Partner. The Assignor Limited Partner was formed for the purpose of serving in that capacity for the Fund and will not engage in any other business.

  Raymond James Partners, Inc. and Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc., wholly-owned subsidiaries of Raymond James Financial, Inc., are the General Partner and the Managing General Partner, respectively. The Managing General Partner manages and controls the business of Gateway.

  Gateway offered BACs in five series. BACs in the amounts of $6,136,000, $5,456,000, $6,915,000, $8,616,000 and $10,105,000 for Series 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, respectively had been issued as of March 31, 2002. Each Series is treated as a separate partnership, investing in a separate and distinct pool of Project Partnerships. Net proceeds from each Series are used to acquire Project Partnerships which are specifically allocated to such Series. Income or loss and all tax items from the Project Partnerships acquired by each Series are specifically allocated among the Assignees of such Series.

  Operating profits and losses, cash distributions from operations and tax credits are allocated 99% to the Assignees and 1% to the General Partners. Profit or loss and cash distributions from sales of properties will be allocated as formulated in the Limited Partnership Agreement.

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

Basis of Accounting

  Gateway utilizes the accrual basis of accounting whereby revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recognized when obligations are incurred.

  Gateway accounts for its investments as the limited partner in Project Partnerships ("Investments in Project Partnerships"), using the equity method of accounting, because management believes that Gateway does not have a majority control of the major operating and financial policies of the Project Partnerships in which it invests, and reports the equity in losses of the Project Partnerships on a 3-month lag in the Statements of Operations. Under the equity method, the Investments in Project Partnerships initially include:

  1) Gateway's capital contribution,
  2) Acquisition fees paid to the General Partner for services rendered in selecting      properties for acquisition, and
  3) Acquisition expenses including legal fees, travel and other miscellaneous costs      relating to acquiring properties.

Quarterly the Investments in Project Partnerships are increased or decreased as follows:

  1) Increased for equity in income or decreased for equity in losses of the Project      Partnerships,
  2) Decreased for cash distributions received from the Project Partnerships, and

  3) Decreased for the amortization of the acquisition fees and expenses.

  Amortization is calculated on a straight-line basis over 35 years, as this is the average estimated useful life of the underlying assets. The amortization expense is shown on the Statements of Operations.

  Pursuant to the limited partnership agreements for the Project Partnerships, cash losses generated by the Project Partnerships are allocated to the general partners of those partnerships. In subsequent years, cash profits, if any, are first allocated to the general partners to the extent of the allocation of prior years' cash losses.

  Since Gateway invests as a limited partner, and therefore is not obligated to fund losses or make additional capital contributions, it does not recognize losses from individual Project Partnerships to the extent that these losses would reduce the investment in those Project Partnerships below zero. The suspended losses will be used to offset future income from the individual Project Partnerships. Distributions received from Project Partnerships whose investment has been reduced to zero are included in Other Income.

  Gateway reviews its investments in Project Partnerships to determine if there has been any permanent impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investment may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the investment, Gateway recognizes an impairment loss. No impairment loss has been recognized in the accompanying financial statements.

  Gateway, as a limited partner in the Project Partnerships, is subject to risks inherent in the ownership of property which are beyond its control, such as fluctuations in occupancy rates and operating expenses, variations in rental schedules, proper maintenance and continued eligibility of tax credits. If the cost of operating a property exceeds the rental income earned thereon, Gateway may deem it in its best interest to voluntarily provide funds in order to protect its investment.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

  It is Gateway's policy to include short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less in Cash and Cash Equivalents. Short-term investments are comprised of money market mutual funds.

Concentration of Credit Risk

  Financial instruments which potentially subject Gateway to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash investments in a money market mutual fund that is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Raymond James Financial, Inc.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the use of estimates that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. These estimates are based on management's knowledge and experience. Accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates.

Investment in Securities

  Effective April 1, 1995, Gateway adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities ("FAS 115"). Under FAS 115, Gateway is required to categorize its debt securities as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale or trading securities, dependent upon Gateway's intent in holding the securities. Gateway's intent is to hold all of its debt securities (U. S. Government Security Strips) until maturity and to use these reserves to fund Gateway's ongoing operations. Interest income is recognized ratably on the U. S. Government Strips using the effective yield to maturity.

Offering and Commission Costs

  Offering and commission costs were charged against Assignees' Equity upon the admission of Limited Partners.

Income Taxes

  No provision for income taxes has been made in these financial statements, as income taxes are a liability of the partners rather than of Gateway.

Reclassifications

  For comparability, the 2001 and 2000 figures have been reclassified, where appropriate, to conform with the financial statement presentation used in 2002.


NOTE 3 - INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES:

  The March 31, 2002 Balance Sheet includes Investment in Securities consisting of U.S. Government Security Strips which represents their cost, plus accreted interest income of $143,397 for Series 2, $127,549 for Series 3, $161,591 for Series 4, $201,404 for Series 5 and $151,531 for Series 6. For convenience, the Investment in Securities are commonly held in a brokerage account with Raymond James and Associates, Inc. A separate accounting is maintained for each series' share of the investments.

 

Estimated Market
Value     
- ----------------

Cost Plus Accreted
Interest    
- -----------------

Gross Unrealized 
Gains and (Losses)
- ----------------

Series 2

$  279,379

$  261,841

$  17,538

Series 3

248,421

232,901

15,520

Series 4

314,846

295,063

19,783

Series 5

392,296

367,758

24,538

Series 6

327,845

304,209

23,636

As of March 31, 2002, the cost and accreted interest of debt securities by contractual maturities is as follows:

 

Series 2
- --------

Series 3
- --------

Series 4
- --------

Due within 1 year

$  56,098

$  49,898

$  63,215

After 1 year through 5 years

205,743
- ---------

183,003
- ---------

231,848
- ---------

  Total Amount Carried on   Balance Sheet


$ 261,841
=========


$ 232,901
=========


$ 295,063
=========

 

Series 5
- --------

Series 6
- --------

Total
- --------

Due within 1 year

$   78,790

$   62,622

$  310,623

After 1 year through 5 years

288,968
- ----------

241,587
- ----------

1,151,149
- ----------

  Total Amount Carried on   Balance Sheet


$  367,758
==========


$  304,209
==========


$1,461,772
==========

NOTE 4 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:

  The Payable to General Partners primarily represents the asset management fees owed to the General Partners at the end of the period. It is unsecured, due on demand and, in accordance with the limited partnership agreement, non-interest bearing. Within the next 12 months, the Managing General Partner does not intend to demand payment on the portion of Asset Management Fees payable classified as long-term on the Balance Sheet.

  For the years ended March 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 the General Partners and affiliates are entitled to compensation and reimbursement for costs and expenses incurred by Gateway as follows:


  Asset Management Fee - The Managing General Partner is entitled to be paid an annual asset management fee equal to 0.25% of the aggregate cost of Gateway's interest in the projects owned by the Project Partnerships. The asset management fee will be paid only after all other expenses of Gateway have been paid. These fees are included in the Statements of Operations.

 

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

Series 2

$  68,197

$  68,361

$  68,511

Series 3

62,892

63,104

63,301

Series 4

77,474

77,661

77,832

Series 5

95,755

96,008

96,241

Series 6

105,753
- ---------

106,125
- ---------

106,486
- ---------

Total

$ 410,071
=========

$ 411,259
=========

$ 412,371
=========

       

  General and Administrative Expenses - The Managing General Partner is reimbursed for general and administrative expenses of Gateway on an accountable basis. This expense is included in the Statements of Operations.

 

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

Series 2

$  11,737

$  9,149

$  8,181

Series 3

12,271

9,565

8,552

Series 4

15,471

12,060

10,779

Series 5

19,205

14,972

13,386

Series 6

20,272
- --------

15,803
- --------

14,130
- --------

 

$ 78,956

$ 61,549

$ 55,028

Total

========

========

========


NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS:

SERIES 2

  As of March 31, 2002, the Partnership had acquired a 99% interest in the profits, losses and tax credits as a limited partner in 22 Project Partnerships which own and operate government assisted multi-family housing complexes.
  Cash flows from operations are allocated according to each Partnership agreement. Upon dissolution proceeds will be distributed according to each Partnership agreement.
  The following is a summary of Investments in Project Partnerships as of:

 

MARCH 31, 2002
- --------------

MARCH 31, 2001
- --------------

 

Capital Contributions to Project Partner- ships and purchase price paid for limited partner interests in Project Partnerships

Cumulative equity in losses of Project Partnerships (1)

Cumulative distributions received from Project Partnerships

Investment in Project Partnerships before Adjustment

Excess of investment cost over the underlying assets acquired:
 Acquisition fees and expenses
 Accumulated amortization of acquisition  fees and expenses


Investments in Project Partnerships



$ 4,524,678 


(4,673,651)


(81,202)
- ------------

(230,175)



390,838 

(82,362)
- ------------

$   78,301 
============



$ 4,524,678 


(4,629,719)


(79,603)
- ------------

(184,644)



390,838 

(81,665)
- ------------

$   124,529 
============

 

(1) In accordance with the Partnership's accounting policy to not carry Investments in Project Partnerships below zero, cumulative suspended losses of $2,940,699 for the year ended March 31, 2002 and cumulative suspended losses of $2,278,397 for the year ended March 31, 2001 are not included.


NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):

SERIES 3

  As of March 31, 2002, the Partnership had acquired a 99% interest in the profits, losses and tax credits as a limited partner in 23 Project Partnerships which own and operate government assisted multi-family housing complexes.
  Cash flows from operations are allocated according to each Partnership agreement. Upon dissolution proceeds will be distributed according to each Partnership agreement.
  The following is a summary of Investments in Project Partnerships as of:

 

MARCH 31, 2002
- --------------

MARCH 31, 2001
- --------------

 

Capital Contributions to Project Partner- ships and purchase price paid for limited partner interests in Project Partnerships

Cumulative equity in losses of Project Partnerships (1)

Cumulative distributions received from Project Partnerships

Investment in Project Partnerships before Adjustment

Excess of investment cost over the underlying assets acquired:
 Acquisition fees and expenses
 Accumulated amortization of acquisition  fees and expenses


Investments in Project Partnerships



$ 3,888,713 


(4,102,836)


(161,490)
- ------------

(375,613)



491,746 

(81,532)
- ------------

$    34,601 
============



$ 3,888,713 


(4,068,395)


(160,514)
- ------------

(340,196)



491,746 

(80,412)
- ------------

$    71,138 
============

 

(1) In accordance with the Partnership's accounting policy to not carry Investments in Project Partnerships below zero, cumulative suspended losses of $3,840,222 for the year ended March 31, 2002 and cumulative suspended losses of $3,164,318 for the year ended March 31, 2001 are not included.


NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):

SERIES 4

  As of March 31, 2002, the Partnership had acquired a 99% interest in the profits, losses and tax credits as a limited partner in 29 Project Partnerships which own and operate government assisted multi-family housing complexes.
  Cash flows from operations are allocated according to each Partnership agreement. Upon dissolution proceeds will be distributed according to each Partnership agreement.
  The following is a summary of Investments in Project Partnerships as of:

 

MARCH 31, 2002
- --------------

MARCH 31, 2001
- --------------

 

Capital Contributions to Project Partner- ships and purchase price paid for limited partner interests in Project Partnerships

Cumulative equity in losses of Project Partnerships (1)

Cumulative distributions received from Project Partnerships

Investment in Project Partnerships before Adjustment

Excess of investment cost over the underlying assets acquired:
 Acquisition fees and expenses
 Accumulated amortization of acquisition  fees and expenses


Investments in Project Partnerships



$ 4,952,519 


(5,182,485)


(116,404)
- ------------

(346,370)



562,967 

(119,856)
- -----------

$   96,741 
============



$ 4,952,519 


(5,064,172)


(111,719)
- ------------

(223,372)



562,967 

(115,906)
- -----------

$   223,689 
============

 

1) In accordance with the Partnership's accounting policy to not carry Investments in Project Partnerships below zero, cumulative suspended losses of $2,771,886 for the year ended March 31, 2002 and cumulative suspended losses of $2,124,143 for the year ended March 31, 2001 are not included.


NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):

SERIES 5

  As of March 31, 2002, the Partnership had acquired a 99% interest in the profits, losses and tax credits as a limited partner in 36 Project Partnerships which own and operate government assisted multi-family housing complexes.
  Cash flows from operations are allocated according to each Partnership agreement. Upon dissolution proceeds will be distributed according to each Partnership agreement.
  The following is a summary of Investments in Project Partnerships as of:

 

MARCH 31, 2002
- --------------

MARCH 31, 2001
- --------------

 

Capital Contributions to Project Partner- ships and purchase price paid for limited partner interests in Project Partnerships

Cumulative equity in losses of Project Partnerships (1)

Cumulative distributions received from Project Partnerships

Investment in Project Partnerships before Adjustment

Excess of investment cost over the underlying assets acquired:
 Acquisition fees and expenses
 Accumulated amortization of acquisition fees  and expenses


Investments in Project Partnerships



$ 6,164,472 


(5,954,631)


(178,539)
- -----------

31,302 



650,837 

(131,993)
- -----------

$  550,146 
===========



$ 6,164,472 


(5,765,304)


(170,895)
- -----------

228,273 



650,837 

(126,883)
- -----------

$  752,227 
===========

 

(1) In accordance with the Partnership's accounting policy to not carry Investments in Project Partnerships below zero, cumulative suspended losses of $3,217,418 for the year ended March 31, 2002 and cumulative suspended losses of $2,431,381 for the year ended March 31, 2001 are not included.


NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):

SERIES 6

  As of March 31, 2002, the Partnership had acquired a 99% interest in the profits, losses and tax credits as a limited partner in 38 Project Partnerships which own and operate government assisted multi-family housing complexes.
  Cash flows from operations are allocated according to each Partnership agreement. Upon dissolution proceeds will be distributed according to each Partnership agreement.
  The following is a summary of Investments in Project Partnerships as of:

 

MARCH 31, 2002
- --------------

MARCH 31, 2001
- --------------

 

Capital Contributions to Project Partner- ships and purchase price paid for limited partner interests in Project Partnerships

Cumulative equity in losses of Project Partnerships (1)

Cumulative distributions received from Project Partnerships

Investment in Project Partnerships before Adjustment

Excess of investment cost over the underlying assets acquired:
 Acquisition fees and expenses
 Accumulated amortization of acquisition fees  and expenses


Investments in Project Partnerships



$ 7,462,215 


(6,620,593)


(190,600)
- ------------

651,022 



785,179 

(179,175)
- ------------

$ 1,257,026 
============



$ 7,462,215 


(6,314,551)


(178,242)
- ------------

969,422 



785,179 

(169,724)
- ------------

$ 1,584,877 
============

 

(1) In accordance with the Partnership's accounting policy to not carry Investments in Project Partnerships below zero, cumulative suspended losses of $2,161,546 for the year ended March 31, 2002 and cumulative suspended losses of $1,552,199 for the year ended March 31, 2001 are not included.


NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):

TOTAL SERIES 2 - 6

  The following is a summary of Investments in Project Partnerships:

 

MARCH 31, 2002
- --------------

MARCH 31, 2001
- --------------

 

Capital Contributions to Project Partner- ships and purchase price paid for limited partner interests in Project Partnerships

Cumulative equity in losses of Project Partnerships (1)

Cumulative distributions received from Project Partnerships

Investment in Project Partnerships before Adjustment

Excess of investment cost over the underlying assets acquired:
 Acquisition fees and expenses
 Accumulated amortization of acquisition  fees and expenses


Investments in Project Partnerships



$ 26,992,597 


(26,534,196)


(728,235)
- ------------

(269,834)



2,881,567 

(594,918)
- ------------

$ 2,016,815 
============



$ 26,992,597 


(25,842,141)


(700,973)
- ------------

449,483 



2,881,567 

(574,590)
- ------------

$ 2,756,460 
============

 

NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):

  In accordance with the Partnership's policy of presenting the financial information
of the Project Partnerships on a three month lag, below is the summarized financial information for the Series' Project Partnerships as of December 31 of each year:

 

DECEMBER 31,           

SERIES 2

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

1999
- ----

SUMMARIZED BALANCE SHEETS
Assets:
  Current assets
  Investment properties, net
  Other assets

    Total assets

Liabilities and Partners' Equity:
  Current liabilities
  Long-term debt

    Total liabilities

Partners' equity
  Limited Partner
  General Partners

    Total Partners' equity

    Total liabilities and
    partners' equity

SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Rental and other income
Expenses:
  Operating expenses
  Interest expense
  Depreciation and amortization

    Total expenses

      Net loss

Other partners' share of net loss

Partnership's share of net loss

Suspended losses

Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships



$ 2,024,736 
18,177,780 
770 
- ------------
$20,203,286 
============

$   455,273 
22,983,936 
- ------------
23,439,209 
- ------------

(3,187,246)
(48,677)
- ------------
(3,235,923)
- ------------

$20,203,286 
============


$ 4,088,506 
- ------------
1,902,218 
2,034,652 
865,003 
- ------------
4,801,873 
- ------------
$ (713,367)
============
$   (7,134)
============
$ (706,233)

662,302 
- ------------

$  (43,931)
============



$ 2,037,305 
19,005,313 
770 
- ------------
$21,043,388 
============

$   471,487 
23,050,161 
- ------------
23,521,648 
- ------------

(2,461,788)
(16,472)
- ------------
(2,478,260)
- ------------

$21,043,388 
============


$ 4,076,622 
- ------------
1,761,220 
2,039,917 
893,266 
- ------------
4,694,403 
- ------------
$ (617,781)
============
$   (6,178)
============
$ (611,603)

535,110 
- ------------

$  (76,493)
============



$ 1,877,161 
19,889,312 
2,370 
- ------------
$21,768,843 
============

$   486,993 
23,110,828 
- ------------
23,597,821 
- ------------

(1,833,812)
4,834 
- ------------
(1,828,978)
- ------------

$21,768,843 
============


$ 4,012,320 
- ------------
1,794,189 
2,044,746 
897,242 
- ------------
4,736,177 
- ------------
$ (723,857)
============
$   (7,239)
============
$ (716,618)

601,074 
- ------------

$ (115,544)
============

As of December 31, 2001, the largest Project Partnership constituted 12.2% and 13.6%, and as of December 31, 2000 the largest Project Partnership constituted 12.3% and 14.4% of the combined total assets by series and combined total revenues by series, respectively.


NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):

  In accordance with the Partnership's policy of presenting the financial information
of the Project Partnerships on a three month lag, below is the summarized financial information for the Series' Project Partnerships as of December 31 of each year:

 

DECEMBER 31,           

SERIES 3

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

1999
- ----

SUMMARIZED BALANCE SHEETS
Assets:
  Current assets
  Investment properties, net
  Other assets

    Total assets

Liabilities and Partners' Equity:
  Current liabilities
  Long-term debt

    Total liabilities

Partners' equity
  Limited Partner
  General Partners

    Total Partners' equity

    Total liabilities and
    partners' equity

SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Rental and other income
Expenses:
  Operating expenses
  Interest expense
  Depreciation and amortization

    Total expenses

      Net loss

Other partners' share of net loss

Partnership's share of net loss

Suspended losses

Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships



$ 2,142,126 
15,257,023 
181,645 
- -----------
$17,580,794 
===========

$   518,692 
21,482,917 
- -----------
22,001,609 
- -----------

(4,567,560)
146,745 
- -----------
(4,420,815)
- -----------

$17,580,794 
============


$ 3,967,831 
- -----------
1,809,964 
1,931,889 
946,476 
- -----------
4,688,329 
- -----------
$  (720,498)
============
$   (10,153)
============
$  (710,345)

675,904 
- -----------

$   (34,441)
============



$ 2,203,617 
16,040,624 
190,282 
- ------------
$18,434,523 
============

$  515,063 
21,568,724 
- -----------
22,083,787 
- -----------

(3,830,418)
181,154 
- -----------
(3,649,264)
- -----------

$18,434,523 
============


$ 3,921,448 
- -----------
1,782,758 
1,943,451 
941,538 
- -----------
4,667,747 
- -----------
$  (746,299)
============
$   (10,887)
============
$  (735,412)

709,318 
- -----------

$   (26,094)
============



$ 2,165,819 
16,926,832 
198,916 
- ------------
$19,291,567 
============

$   491,796 
21,648,149 
- -----------
22,139,945 
- -----------

(3,068,148)
219,770 
- -----------
(2,848,378)
- -----------

$19,291,567 
============


$ 3,900,623 
- -----------
1,681,735 
2,006,761 
1,213,599 
- -----------
4,902,095 
- -----------
$(1,001,472)
============
$   (13,453)
============
$  (988,019)

873,319 
- -----------

$  (114,700)
============

As of December 31, 2001, the largest Project Partnership constituted 6.6% and 6.3%, and
as of December 31, 2000 the largest Project Partnership constituted 6.6% and 6.5% of the combined total assets by series and combined total revenues by series, respectively.


NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):

  In accordance with the Partnership's policy of presenting the financial information
of the Project Partnerships on a three month lag, below is the summarized financial information for the Series' Project Partnerships as of December 31 of each year:

 

DECEMBER 31,          

SERIES 4

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

1999
- ----

SUMMARIZED BALANCE SHEETS
Assets:
  Current assets
  Investment properties, net
  Other assets

    Total assets

Liabilities and Partners' Equity:
  Current liabilities
  Long-term debt

    Total liabilities

Partners' equity
  Limited Partner
  General Partners

    Total Partners' equity

    Total liabilities and
    partners' equity

SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Rental and other income
Expenses:
  Operating expenses
  Interest expense
  Depreciation and amortization

    Total expenses

      Net loss

Other partners' share of net loss

Partnership's share of net loss

Suspended losses

Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships



$ 2,223,546 
21,695,221 
7,687 
- -----------
$23,926,454 
===========

$   706,112 
26,300,200 
- -----------
27,006,312 
- -----------

(3,142,028)
62,170 
- -----------
(3,079,858)
- -----------

$23,926,454 
============


$ 4,691,169 
- -----------
2,370,889 
2,116,061 
979,666 
- -----------
5,466,616 
- -----------
$  (775,447)
===========
$    (9,390)
===========
$  (766,057)

647,743 
- -----------

$  (118,314)
===========



$ 2,319,692 
22,426,102 
8,059 
- -----------
$24,753,853 
===========

$   629,914 
26,375,576 
- -----------
27,005,490 
- -----------

(2,353,411)
101,774 
- -----------
(2,251,637)
- -----------

$24,753,853 
============


$ 4,552,896 
- -----------
2,321,963 
2,113,809 
976,176 
- -----------
5,411,948 
- -----------
$ (859,052)
===========
$  (11,904)
===========
$ (847,148)

592,985 
- -----------

$ (254,163)
===========



$ 2,375,444 
23,334,011 
8,431 
- -----------
$25,717,886 
===========

$   620,178 
26,444,765 
- -----------
27,064,943 
- -----------

(1,495,788)
148,731 
- -----------
(1,347,057)
- -----------

$25,717,886 
============


$ 4,625,537 
- -----------
2,093,013 
2,276,169 
983,083 
- -----------
5,352,265 
- -----------
$ (726,728)
===========
$  (22,642)
===========
$ (704,086)

528,263 
- -----------

$ (175,823)
============

As of December 31, 2001, the largest Project Partnership constituted 6.3% and 6.1%, and
as of December 31, 2000 the largest Project Partnership constituted 6.2% and 5.9% of the combined total assets by series and combined total revenues by series, respectively.


NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):

  In accordance with the Partnership's policy of presenting the financial information
of the Project Partnerships on a three month lag, below is the summarized financial information for the Series' Project Partnerships as of December 31 of each year:

 

DECEMBER 31,

SERIES 5

     2001

2000

        1999

SUMMARIZED BALANCE SHEETS
Assets:
  Current assets
  Investment properties, net
  Other assets

    Total assets

Liabilities and Partners' Equity:
  Current liabilities
  Long-term debt

    Total liabilities

Partners' equity
  Limited Partner
  General Partners

    Total Partners' equity

    Total liabilities and     partners' equity

SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Rental and other income
Expenses:
  Operating expenses
  Interest expense
  Depreciation and amortization

    Total expenses

      Net loss

Other partners' share of net loss

Partnership's share of net loss

Suspended losses

Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships



$ 2,984,516 
26,874,152 
2,302 
- -----------
$29,860,970 
===========

$   735,358 
32,462,257 
- -----------
33,197,615 
- -----------

(3,138,040)
(198,605)
- -----------
(3,336,645)
- -----------

$29,860,970 
===========

$ 5,345,086 
- -----------
2,776,878 
2,259,308 
1,294,116 
- -----------
6,330,302 
- -----------
$  (985,216)
===========
$    (9,852)
===========
$  (975,364)

786,037 
- -----------

$  (189,327)
===========

            
            
 $ 2,911,097
  28,099,333
       2,552

$31,012,982
   ========
            
 $   733,324
  32,564,539

  33,297,863

            
 (2,139,036)
   (145,845)

 (2,284,881)


 $31,012,982
   ========
            
 $ 5,291,101

   2,708,108
   2,277,520
   1,283,498

   6,269,126

 $ (978,025)
   ========
 $   (9,780)
   ========
 $ (968,245)
           
     788,480


 $ (179,765)
   ========



$ 2,903,343 
29,235,956 
2,552 
- -----------
$32,141,851 
===========

$   720,555 
32,658,604 
- -----------
33,379,159 
- -----------

(1,136,314)
(100,994)
- -----------
(1,237,308)
- -----------

$32,141,851 
==========

$ 5,614,817 
- -----------
2,570,893 
2,658,463 
1,286,201 
- -----------
6,515,557 
- -----------
$  (900,740)
===========
$    (9,008)
===========
$  (891,732)

713,592 
- -----------

$  (178,140)
===========

As of December 31, 2001, the largest Project Partnership constituted 8.1% and 8.6%, and as of December 31, 2000 the largest Project Partnership constituted 8.0% and 8.6% of the combined total assets by series and combined total revenues by series, respectively.


NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):

  In accordance with the Partnership's policy of presenting the financial information of the Project Partnerships on a three month lag, below is the summarized financial information for the Series' Project Partnerships as of
December 31 of each year:

 

DECEMBER 31,           

SERIES 6

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

1999
- ----

SUMMARIZED BALANCE SHEETS
Assets:
  Current assets
  Investment properties, net
  Other assets

    Total assets

Liabilities and Partners' Equity:
  Current liabilities
  Long-term debt

    Total liabilities

Partners' equity
  Limited Partner
  General Partners

    Total Partners' equity

    Total liabilities and     partners' equity

SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Rental and other income
Expenses:
  Operating expenses
  Interest expense
  Depreciation and amortization

    Total expenses

      Net loss

Other partners' share of net loss

Partnership's share of net loss

Suspended losses

Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships



$ 3,313,947 
30,748,096 
4,626 
- ------------
$34,066,669 
============

$   739,207 
35,191,000 
- ------------
35,930,207 
- ------------

(1,523,911)
(339,627)
- ------------
(1,863,538)
- ------------

$34,066,669 
============

$ 5,951,586 
- ------------
2,826,568 
2,704,167 
1,347,661 
- ------------
6,878,396 
- ------------
$  (926,810)
============
$   (11,421)
============
$  (915,389)

609,347 
- ------------

$  (306,042)
============



$ 3,196,719 
31,966,534 
4,857 
- ------------
$35,168,110 
============

$   697,789 
35,341,376 
- ------------
36,039,165 
- ------------

(576,890)
(294,165)
- ------------
(871,055)
- ------------

$35,168,110 
============

$ 5,737,151 
- ------------
2,604,025 
2,715,299 
1,337,714 
- ------------
6,657,038 
- ------------
$  (919,887)
============
$   (12,093)
============
$  (907,794)

523,064 
- ------------

$  (384,730)
============



$ 3,056,225 
33,193,532 
8,088 
- ------------
$36,257,845 
============

$   670,941 
35,487,112 
- ------------
36,158,053 
- ------------

354,389 
(254,597)
- ------------
99,792 
- ------------

$36,257,845 
============

$ 5,831,193 
- ------------
2,459,553 
2,875,156 
1,371,839 
- ------------
6,706,548 
- ------------
$  (875,355)
============
$   (11,452)
============
$  (863,903)

430,306 
- ------------

$  (433,597)
============

As of December 31, 2001, the largest Project Partnership constituted 6.5% and 6.3%, and as of December 31, 2000 the largest Project Partnership constituted 6.7% and 5.8% of the combined total assets by series and combined total revenues by series, respectively.


NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):

  In accordance with the Partnership's policy of presenting the financial information
of the Project Partnerships on a three month lag, below is the summarized financial information for the Series' Project Partnerships as of December 31 of each year:

 

DECEMBER 31,

TOTAL SERIES 2 - 6

2001

          2000

1999

SUMMARIZED BALANCE SHEETS
Assets:
  Current assets
  Investment properties, net
  Other assets

    Total assets

Liabilities and Partners' Equity:
  Current liabilities
  Long-term debt

    Total liabilities

Partners' equity
  Limited Partner
  General Partners

    Total Partners' equity

    Total liabilities and
    partners' equity

SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Rental and other income
Expenses:
  Operating expenses
  Interest expense
  Depreciation and amortization

    Total expenses

      Net loss

Other partners' share of net loss

Partnership's share of net loss

Suspended losses

Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships

              
              
 $ 12,688,871 
  112,752,272 
      197,030 
  ----------
 $125,638,173 
  ==========
              
 $  3,154,642 
  138,420,310 
  ----------
  141,574,952 
  ----------
              
  (15,558,785)
     (377,994)
  ----------
  (15,936,779)
  ----------
              
 $125,638,173 
  ==========
              

 $ 24,044,178 
  --------
   11,686,517 
   11,046,077 
    5,432,922 
  ---------
   28,165,516 
  ---------
 $ (4,121,338)
    ==========
 $    (47,950)
    ==========
 $ (4,073,388)
              
    3,381,333 
    --------
              
 $   (692,055)
    ==========



$ 12,668,430 
117,537,906 
206,520 
- ------------
$130,412,856 
============

$  3,047,577 
138,900,376 
- ------------
141,947,953 
- ------------

(11,361,543)
(173,554)
- ------------
(11,535,097)
- ------------

$130,412,856 
============


$ 23,579,218 
- ------------
11,178,074 
11,089,996 
5,432,192 
- ------------
27,700,262 
- ------------
$ (4,121,044)
============
$    (50,842)
============
$ (4,070,202)

3,148,957 
- ------------

$   (921,245)
============



$ 12,377,992 
122,579,643 
220,357 
- ------------
$135,177,992 
============

$  2,990,463 
139,349,458 
- ------------
142,339,921 
- ------------

(7,179,673)
17,744 
- ------------
(7,161,929)
- ------------

$135,177,992 
============


$ 23,984,490 
- ------------
10,599,383 
11,861,295 
5,751,964 
- ------------
28,212,642 
- ------------
$ (4,228,152)
============
$    (63,794)
============
$ (4,164,358)

3,146,554 
- ------------

$ (1,017,804)
============

   

 

 

NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):

  The Partnership's equity by Series as reflected by the Project Partnerships differs from the Partnership's Investments in Project Partnerships before acquisition fees and expenses and amortization by Series primarily because of suspended losses on the Partnerships books and differences in the accounting treatment of miscellaneous items.

  By Series these differences are as follows:

 

Equity Per Project Partnership   
- ------------------


Equity Per Partnership
- ----------------------

Series 2

$ (3,187,246)

$  (230,175)

Series 3

(4,567,560)

(375,613)

Series 4

(3,142,028)

(346,370)

Series 5

(3,138,040)

31,302 

Series 6

(1,523,911)

651,022 

  The report of the independent certified public accountants with respect to the financial statements of one Project Partnership expressed substantial doubt as to the Project Partnership's ability to continue as a going concern. Gateway's net investment in this Project Partnership at March 31, 2002 and 2001 is zero. Gateway's original investment in the Project Partnership approximated $176,850. Through December 31, 2001, the Project Partnership has had recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency.


NOTE 6 - TAXABLE INCOME (LOSS):

  The following is a reconciliation between Net Income (Loss) as described in the financial statements and the Partnership income (loss) for tax purposes:

SERIES 2

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

Net Loss per Financial Statements

$  (99,198)

$  (123,576)

$  (166,538)


Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships for tax purposes less than (in excess of) losses for financial statement purposes





(766,507)





(607,544)





(667,867)


Adjustments to convert March 31, fiscal year end to December 31, taxable year end




2,365 




(1,157)




(42,530)


Items Expensed for Financial Statement purposes not expensed for Tax purposes:
  Asset Management Fee
  Amortization Expense
  Other Adjustments





33,368 
703 
(8,982)
- -----------





34,070 
2,074 
(7,170)
- -----------





35,353 
46,550 
(6,936)
- -----------

Partnership loss for tax purposes as of December 31


$  (838,251)
============


$  (703,303)
============


$  (801,968)
============

 


December 31,
2001   
- ------------


December 31,
2000   
- ------------


December 31,
1999   
- ------------

Federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits (Unaudited)


$   393,435 
============


$ 1,007,776 
============


$ 1,030,466 
============

  The differences in the assets and liabilities of the Series for financial reporting purposes and tax reporting purposes for the year ended March 31, 2002 are as follows:

                                  Financial         Tax
                                  Reporting         Reporting
                                  Purposes           Purposes        Differences

Investments in Local
  Limited Partnerships            $    78,301       $(4,015,170)     $ 4,093,471

Other Assets                      $   497,646       $ 1,219,552      $  (721,906)

Liabilities                       $   483,380       $     5,613      $   477,767


NOTE 6 - TAXABLE INCOME (LOSS):

  The following is a reconciliation between Net Income (Loss) as described in the financial statements and the Partnership income (loss) for tax purposes:

SERIES 3

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

Net Loss per Financial Statements

$   (80,062)

$   (58,677)

$   (147,068)


Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships for tax purposes less than (in excess of) losses for financial statement purposes





(701,962)





(729,147)





(617,452)


Adjustments to convert March 31, fiscal year end to December 31, taxable year end




6,786 




2,342 




(48,955)


Items Expensed for Financial Statement purposes not expensed for Tax purposes:
  Asset Management Fee
  Amortization Expense
  Other Adjustments





25,902 
1,121 
(22,840)
- -----------





23,675 
(320)
(22,645)
- -----------





22,159 
43,005 
(14,514)
- ------------

Partnership loss for tax purposes as of December 31


$  (771,055)
============


$  (784,772)
============


$  (762,825)

============

 


December 31,
2001   
- ------------


December 31,
2000   
- ------------


December 31,
1999   
- ------------

Federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits (Unaudited)


$   33,914 
============


$   246,310 
============


$   379,668 
============

  The differences in the assets and liabilities of the Series for financial reporting purposes and tax reporting purposes for the year ended March 31, 2002 are as follows:

                                   Financial         Tax
                                   Reporting         Reporting
                                   Purposes          Purposes       Differences

Investments in Local
  Limited Partnerships             $  34,601        $(3,862,975)   $3,897,576

Other Assets                       $ 430,929        $ 1,073,956    $ (643,027)

Liabilities                        $ 378,007        $     5,892    $  372,115


NOTE 6 - TAXABLE INCOME (LOSS):

  The following is a reconciliation between Net Income (Loss) as described in the financial statements and the Partnership income (loss) for tax purposes:

SERIES 4

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

Net Loss per Financial Statements

$  (185,366)

$  (311,663)

$  (235,491)


Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships for tax purposes less than (in excess of) losses for financial statement purposes





(792,465)





(733,176)





(657,984)


Adjustments to convert March 31, fiscal year end to December 31, taxable year end




2,098 




(255)




(81,152)


Items Expensed for Financial Statement purposes not expensed for Tax purposes:
  Asset Management Fee
  Amortization Expense
  Other Adjustments





32,919 
4,262 
(12,169)
- -----------





34,814 
5,852 
(11,033)
- -----------





35,656 
85,586 
(7,650)
- -----------

Partnership loss for tax purposes as of December 31


$  (950,721)
============


$(1,015,461)
============


$  (861,035)
============

 


December 31,
2001   
- ------------


December 31,
2000   
- ------------


December 31,
1999   
- ------------

Federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits (Unaudited)


$   571,729 
============


$ 1,157,673 
============


$ 1,177,677 
============

  The differences in the assets and liabilities of the Series for financial reporting purposes and tax reporting purposes for the year ended March 31, 2002 are as follows:

                                Financial          Tax
                                Reporting          Reporting
                                Purposes            Purposes       Differences

Investments in Local
  Limited Partnerships         $   96,741        $(4,499,941)     $ 4,596,682

Other Assets                   $   567,242        $ 1,386,936       $ (819,694)

Liabilities                    $   482,040        $     7,288       $  474,752


NOTE 6 - TAXABLE INCOME (LOSS):

  The following is a reconciliation between Net Income (Loss) as described in the financial statements and the Partnership income (loss) for tax purposes:

SERIES 5

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

Net Loss per Financial Statements

$  (268,277)

$  (248,131)

$  (243,982)


Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships for tax purposes less than (in excess of) losses for financial statement purposes





(904,115)





(866,880)





(831,003)


Adjustments to convert March 31, fiscal year end to December 31, taxable year end




487 




4,320 




(30,361)


Items Expensed for Financial Statement purposes not expensed for Tax purposes:
  Asset Management Fee
  Amortization Expense
  Other Adjustments





35,487 
4,324 
(13,898)
- -----------





36,613 
5,883 
(17,118)
- -----------





38,069 
35,067 
(14,529)
- -----------

Partnership loss for tax purposes as of December 31


$(1,145,992)
============


$(1,085,313)
============


$(1,046,739)
============

 


December 31,
2001   
- ------------


December 31,
2000   
- ------------


December 31,
1999   
- ------------

Federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits (Unaudited)


$ 1,325,419 
============


$ 1,432,923 
============


$ 1,432,448 
============

  The differences in the assets and liabilities of the Series for financial reporting purposes and tax reporting purposes for the year ended March 31, 2002 are as follows:

                                Financial        Tax
                                Reporting        Reporting
                                Purposes         Purposes         Differences

Investments in Local
  Limited Partnerships          $ 550,146        $(3,958,706)     $ 4,508,852

Other Assets                    $ 748,135        $ 1,760,802      $(1,012,667)

Liabilities                     $ 505,416        $     8,932      $   496,484


NOTE 6 - TAXABLE INCOME (LOSS):

  The following is a reconciliation between Net Income (Loss) as described in the financial statements and the Partnership income (loss) for tax purposes:

SERIES 6

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

Net Loss per Financial Statements

$  (407,763)

$  (481,031)

$  (531,947)


Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships for tax purposes less than (in excess of) losses for financial statement purposes





(813,890)





(734,221)





(667,038)


Adjustments to convert March 31, fiscal year end to December 31, taxable year end




(4,523)




1,053 




894 


Items Expensed for Financial Statement purposes not expensed
for Tax purposes:
  Asset Management Fee
  Amortization Expense
  Other Adjustments





48,192 
12,066 
(8,930)
- ------------





49,073 
14,175 
(8,057)
- ------------





51,057 
10,829 
(3,915)
- -----------

Partnership loss for tax purposes as of December 31


$(1,174,848)
============


$(1,159,008)
============


$(1,140,120)
============


December 31,
2001   
- -----------


December 31,
2000   
- -----------


December 31,
1999   
- -----------

Federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits (Unaudited)


$ 1,690,264 
============


$ 1,690,085 
============


$ 1,690,086 
============

  The differences in the assets and liabilities of the Series for financial reporting purposes and tax reporting purposes for the year ended March 31, 2002 are as follows:

                                       Financial         Tax
                                       Reporting         Reporting
                                       Purposes          Purposes      Differences

Investments in Local
  Limited Partnerships               $1,257,026         $(2,890,908)    $ 4,147,934

Other Assets                         $  759,586         $ 1,920,837     $(1,161,251)

Liabilities                          $  620,048         $     9,610     $   610,438


NOTE 6 - TAXABLE INCOME (LOSS):

  The following is a reconciliation between Net Income (Loss) as described in the financial statements and the Partnership income (loss) for tax purposes:

TOTAL SERIES 2 - 6

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

Net Loss per Financial Statements

$(1,040,666)

$(1,223,078)

$(1,325,026)


Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships for tax purposes less than (in excess of) losses for financial statement purposes





(3,978,939)





(3,670,968)





(3,441,344)


Adjustments to convert March 31, fiscal year end to December 31, taxable year end




7,213 




6,303 




(202,104)


Items Expensed for Financial Statement purposes not expensed
for Tax purposes:
  Asset Management Fee
  Amortization Expense
  Other Adjustments





175,868 
22,476 
(66,819)
- -----------





178,245 
27,664 
(66,023)
- -----------





182,294 
221,037 
(47,544)
- -----------

Partnership loss for tax purposes as of December 31


$(4,808,867)
============


$(4,747,857)
============


$(4,612,687)
============

  The difference in the total value of the Partnership's Investment in Project Partnerships is approximately $4,093,000 higher for Series 2, $3,898,000 higher for Series 3, $4,597,000 higher for Series 4, $4,509,000 higher for Series 5 and $4,148,000 higher for Series 6 for financial reporting purposes than for tax return purposes because (i) there were depreciation differences between financial reporting purposes and tax return purposes and (ii) certain expenses are not deductible for tax return purposes.

  The differences in the assets and liabilities of the Fund for financial reporting purposes and tax reporting purposes for the year ended March 31, 2002 are as follows:

                                Financial         Tax
                                Reporting         Reporting
                                Purposes           Purposes        Differences

Investments in Local
  Limited Partnerships          $2,016,815        $(19,227,699)    $21,244,514

Other Assets                    $3,003,538        $  7,362,083     $(4,358,545)

Liabilities                     $2,468,891        $     37,335     $ 2,431,556


NOTE 7 - SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED):

Series 2
Year 2002                Quarter 1      Quarter 2     Quarter 3     Quarter 4
                         6/30/2001     9/30/2001     12/31/2001    3/31/2002

Total Revenues           $   7,363     $    6,765    $   6,024     $  16,514

Net Income (Loss)        $ (18,494)    $  (14,975)   $ (21,740)    $ (43,989)

Earnings (Loss) Per
Weighted Average
Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding $  (2.98)     $   (2.42)    $  (3.51)     $  (7.09)

Series 3
Year 2002                Quarter 1      Quarter 2     Quarter 3     Quarter 4
                         6/30/2001     9/30/2001    12/31/2001     3/31/2002

Total Revenues           $   6,294     $    5,948   $   5,298      $  24,986

Net Income (Loss)        $ (18,269)    $  (19,383)  $ (14,143)     $ (28,267)

Earnings (Loss) Per
Weighted Average
Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding $   (3.31)     $   (3.52)   $  (2.57)     $   (5.13)

Series 4
Year 2002                Quarter 1
     Quarter 2     Quarter 3     Quarter 4
                         6/30/2001      9/30/2001     12/31/2001     3/31/2002

Total Revenues           $   8,219      $   7,753     $   6,852      $  21,602

Net Income (Loss)        $ (49,210)     $ (30,100)    $ (40,404)     $ (65,652)

Earnings (Loss) Per
Weighted Average
Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding $  (7.05)     $   (4.30)     $  (5.79)      $  (9.40)


NOTE 7 - SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) (Continued):

Series 5
Year 2002                  Quarter 1     Quarter 2      Quarter 3     Quarter 4
                           6/30/2001     9/30/2001     12/31/2001     3/31/2002

Total Revenues            $   10,621 $   9,928     $   8,697      $  29,621

Net Income (Loss)         $ (64,253)    $ (48,932)    $ (95,529)     $ (59,563)

Earnings (Loss) Per
Weighted Average
Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding  $   (7.38)     $  (5.63)    $  (10.97)     $   (6.85)

Series 6
Year 2002                 Quarter 1     Quarter 2     Quarter 3     Quarter 4
                          6/30/2001     9/30/2001     12/31/2001     3/31/2002

Total Revenues            $  10,476     $   9,567     $   8,310     $  24,430

Net Income (Loss)         $(104,803)    $ (81,256)    $(126,383)    $ (95,321)

Earnings (Loss) Per
Weighted Average
Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding  $  (10.27)    $   (7.96)    $  (12.38)    $   (9.34)

Series 2 - 6
Year 2002                  Quarter 1     Quarter 2     Quarter 3     Quarter 4
                          6/30/2001     9/30/2001     12/31/2001     3/31/2002

Total Revenues            $  42,973     $  39,961     $  35,181      $ 117,153

Net Income (Loss)         $(255,029)    $(194,646)    $(298,199)     $(292,792)


NOTE 7 - SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) (Continued):

Series 2
Year 2001                Quarter 1     Quarter 2     Quarter 3     Quarter 4
                         6/30/2000     9/30/2000     12/31/2000    3/31/2001

Total Revenues           $   8,701     $   8,761     $   8,515     $   8,155

Net Income (Loss)        $ (67,552)    $ (73,068)    $  16,655     $     389

Earnings (Loss) Per
Weighted Average
Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding $  (10.90)    $  (11.79)    $    2.69     $    0.06

Series 3
Year 2001                Quarter 1     Quarter 2    Quarter 3     Quarter 4
                         6/30/2000     9/30/2000    12/31/2000     3/31/2001

Total Revenues           $   7,368     $   7,682    $   7,395      $  29,940

Net Income (Loss)        $ (23,998)    $ (24,576)   $ (13,401)     $   3,298

Earnings (Loss) Per
Weighted Average
Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding $   (4.35)     $   (4.46)   $  (2.44)     $    0.60

Series 4
Year 2001                Quarter 1
     Quarter 2     Quarter 3     Quarter 4
                         6/30/2000      9/30/2000     12/31/2000     3/31/2001

Total Revenues           $   9,724      $  10,110     $   9,814      $  21,497

Net Income (Loss)        $ (78,780)     $ (78,697)    $ (56,387)     $ (97,799)

Earnings (Loss) Per
Weighted Average
Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding $  (11.28)     $  (11.27)    $   (8.07)     $  (14.00)


NOTE 7 - SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) (Continued):

Series 5
Year 2001                  Quarter 1     Quarter 2     Quarter 3     Quarter 4
                           6/30/2000     9/30/2000     12/31/2000     3/31/2001

Total Revenues            $  12,609     $  13,042     $  12,642      $  25,951

Net Income (Loss)         $ (84,676)    $ (94,498)    $ (26,885)     $ (42,072)

Earnings (Loss) Per
Weighted Average
Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding  $   (9.73)     $  (10.86)    $  (3.09)     $   (4.83)

Series 6
Year 2001                 Quarter 1     Quarter 2     Quarter 3     Quarter 4
                          6/30/2000     9/30/2000     12/31/2000     3/31/2001

Total Revenues            $  12,500     $  12,759     $  12,276     $  20,006

Net Income (Loss)         $(151,225)    $(184,659)    $(100,280)    $ (44,867)

Earnings (Loss) Per
Weighted Average
Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding  $  (14.82)    $  (18.09)    $   (9.82)    $   (4.40)

Series 2-6
Year 2001                 Quarter 1      Quarter 2     Quarter 3     Quarter 4
                          6/30/2000      9/30/2000     12/31/2000     3/31/2001

Total Revenues            $  50,902     $  52,354     $  50,642      $ 114,531

Net Income (Loss)         $(406,231)    $(455,498)    $(180,298)     $(181,051)


Hill, Barth & King LLC
5121 Zuck Road
Erie, PA 16506
PHONE:  814-836-9968
FAX:  814-836-9989

                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                             -------------------------------

To the Partners
Springwood Apartments Limited Partnership
Westfield, New York

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Springwood Apartments Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and the significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Springwood Apartments Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 18, 2002 on our consideration of Springwood Apartments Limited Partnership internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.

/s/ Hill, Barth & King LLC
Certified Public Accountants

January 18, 2002


Hill, Barth & King LLC
5121 Zuck Road
Erie, PA 16506
PHONE:  814-836-9968
FAX:  814-836-9989

                           INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                           ------------------------------

To the Partners
Cherrytree Apartments Limited Partnership
Albion, Pennsylvania

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Cherrytree Apartments Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cherrytree Apartments Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 15, 2002 on our consideration of Cherrytree Apartments Limited Partnership internal control over financial reporting and our tests of compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.

/s/ Hill, Barth & King LLC
Certified Public Accountants

January 15, 2002


Hill, Barth & King LLC
5121 Zuck Road
Erie, PA 16506
PHONE:  814-836-9968
FAX:  814-836-9989

                            INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                          ---------------------------------

To the Partners
Wynnwood Commons Associates Limited Partnership
Fairchance, Pennsylvania

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Wynnwood Commons Associates Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Wynnwood Common Associates Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 25, 2002 on our consideration of Wynnwood Commons Associates Limited Partnership internal control over financial reporting and our tests of compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.

/s/ Hill, Barth & King LLC
Certified Public Accountants

January 25, 2002


Hill, Barth & King LLC
5121 Zuck Road
Erie, PA 16506
PHONE:  814-836-9968
FAX:  814-836-9989

                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                             --------------------------------

To the Partners
Stony Creek Commons Limited Partnership
Hooversville, Pennsylvania

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Stony Creek Commons Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Stony Creek Commons Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 25, 2002 on our consideration of Stony Creek Commons Limited Partnership internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.

/s/ Hill, Barth & King LLC
Certified Public Accountants

January25, 2002


Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
3488 N. Valdosta Rd. - P.O. Box 2241
Valdosta, GA 31604-2241
PHONE:  229-245-6040
FAX:  229-245-1669

                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                             -------------------------------

To the Partners
Richland Elderly Housing, Ltd.
Valdosta, Georgia

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Richland Elderly Housing, Ltd. (a limited partnership), Federal ID No.: 58-1848044, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Richland Elderly Housing, Ltd. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 29, 2002 on our consideration of the Richland Elderly Housing, Ltd.'s internal control structure and a report dated January 29, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations. These reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.

/s/ Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

January 29, 2002


Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
3488 N. Valdosta Rd. - P.O. Box 2241
Valdosta, GA 31604-2241
PHONE:  229-245-6040
FAX:  229-245-1669

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                               -----------------------------

To the Partners
Pearson Elderly Housing, Ltd.
Valdosta, Georgia

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Pearson Elderly Housing, Ltd. (A Limited Partnership), Federal ID No.: 58-1848042, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pearson Elderly Housing, Ltd. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 29, 2002 on our consideration of the Pearson Elderly Housing, Ltd.'s internal control structure and a report dated January 29, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations. These reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.

/s/ Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

January 29, 2002


Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
3488 N. Valdosta Rd. - P.O. Box 2241
Valdosta, GA 31604-2241
PHONE:  229-245-6040
FAX:  229-245-1669

                                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              -------------------------------

To the Partners
Lake Park Apartments, Ltd.
Valdosta, Georgia

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Lake Park Apartments, Ltd. (A Limited Partnership), Federal ID No.: 58-1844429, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of American and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lake Park Apartments, Ltd. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 29, 2002 on our consideration of the Lake Park Apartments, Ltd.'s internal control structure and a report dated January 29, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations. These reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with the report in considering the results.

/s/ Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

January 29, 2002


Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
3488 N. Valdosta Rd. - P.O. Box 2241
Valdosta, GA 31604-2241
PHONE:  229-245-6040
FAX:  229-245-1669

                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                             ------------------------------

To the Partners
Lakeland Elderly Housing, Ltd.
Valdosta, Georgia

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Lakeland Elderly Housing, Ltd. (a limited partnership), Federal ID No.: 58-1898054, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lakeland Elderly Housing, Ltd. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 29, 2002 on our consideration of the Lakeland Elderly Housing, Ltd.'s internal control structure and report dated January 29, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations. These reports are and integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.

/s/ Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

January 29, 2002


Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP
5565 Glenridge Connector, Suite 200
Atlanta, GA 30342
PHONE:  404-892-9651
FAX:  404-876-3913

                                 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                                -------------------------------

To the Partners of
Woodland Terrace

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of WOODLAND TERRACE APARTMENTS, LTD., L.L.L.P. (USDA Rural Development Case No. 10-017-581854412), a limited partnership, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration's Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of WOODLAND TERRACE APARTMENTS, LTD. , L.L.L.P., as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, its changes in partner's equity (deficit), and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 25, 2002, on our consideration of WOODLAND TERRACE APARTMENTS, LTD., L.L.L.P.'s internal control and a report dated January 25, 2002, on its compliance with laws and regulations applicable to the financial statements. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 12-14 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Atlanta, Georgia
January 25, 2002


Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP
5565 Glenridge Connector, Suite 200
Atlanta, Georgia 30342
PHONE:  404-892-9651
FAX:  404-876-3913

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              ------------------------------

To the Partners of
Manchester Housing, Ltd., L.L.L.P.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of MANCHESTER HOUSING, LTD., L.L.L.P., (USDA Rural Development Case No. 10-099-581845215), a limited partnership, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration's Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MANCHESTER HOUSING, LTD., L.L.L.P., as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, its changes in partners' equity (deficit), and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 25, 2002, on our consideration of MANCHESTER HOUSING, LTD., L.L.L.P.'s internal control and a report dated January 25, 2002, on its compliance with laws and regulations applicable to the financial statements. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 12-14 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Atlanta, Georgia
January 25, 2002


Davis, Nichols & Associates LLP
3555 North Crossing Circle
Valdosta, GA 31602
PHONE: 229-247-9801
FAX:  229-244-7704

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                               -----------------------------

To the Partners
Heritage Villas, L.P.
McRae, Georgia

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Heritage Villas, L.P. (a limited partnership), Federal ID #: 58-1898056, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, partners' (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Heritage Villas, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued reports dated February 8, 2002 on our consideration of Heritage Villas, L.P.'s internal control structure and its compliance with laws and regulations.

/s/ Davis, Nichols & Associates LLP
Certified Public Accountants and Consultants

February 8, 2002


Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP
5565 Glenridge Connector, Suite 200
Atlanta, GA 30342
PHONE:  404-892-9651
FAX:  404-876-3913

                           INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                           -----------------------------

To the Partners of
Crisp Properties, L.L.L.P.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of CRISP PROPERTIES, L.L.L.P. (USDA Rural Development Case No. 10-017-581854412), a limited partnership, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration's Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CRISP PROPERTIES, L.L.L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, its changes in partners equity (deficit), and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 25, 2002 on our consideration of CRISP PROPERTIES, L.L.L.P.'s internal control and a report dated January 25, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations applicable to the financial statements. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 12-14 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Atlanta, Georgia

January 25, 2002


Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP
5565 Glenridge Connector, Suite 200
Atlanta, GA 30342
PHONE:  404-892-9651
FAX:  404-876-3913

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                               -----------------------------

To the Partners of
Blackshear Apartments, L.L.L.P. Phase II

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of BLACKSHEAR APARTMENTS, L.L.L.P. PHASE II (USDA Rural Development Case No. 10-040-581925616), a limited partnership, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration's Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of BLACKSHEAR APARTMENTS, L.L.L.P. PHASE II as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, its changes in partner's equity (deficit), and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 25, 2002 on our consideration of BLACKSHEAR APARTMENTS, L.L.L.P. PHASE II'S internal control and a report dated January 25, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations applicable to financial statements. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of Our audits.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on page 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Atlanta, Georgia

January 25, 2002


Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
3488 N. Valdosta Rd. - P.O. Box 2241
Valdosta, GA 31604-2241
PHONE:  229-245-6040
FAX:  229-245-1669

                                 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                                ------------------------------

To the Partners
Crawford Rental Housing, L.P.
Valdosta, Georgia

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Crawford Rental Housing, L.P. (a limited partnership), Federal ID #: 58-1850761, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Crawford Rental Housing, L.P. as of December 31, 2001and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 29, 2002 on our consideration of Crawford Rental Housing, L.P.'s internal control structure and a report dated January 29, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations. These reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.

/s/ Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

January 29, 2002


Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
3488 N. Valdosta Rd. - P.O. Box 2241
Valdosta, GA 31604-2241
PHONE: 229-245-6040
FAX: 229-245-1669

                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                             ------------------------------

To the Partners
Shellman Housing, L.P.
Valdosta, Georgia

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Shellman Housing, L.P. (a limited partnership), Federal ID No. 58-1917615, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Shellman Housing L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 29, 2002 on our consideration of the Shellman Housing L.P.'s internal control structure and a report dated January 29, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations. These reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.

/s/ Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

January 29, 2002


Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
3488 N. Valdosta Rd. - P.O. Box 2241
Valdosta, GA 31604-2241
PHONE: 229-245-6040
FAX: 229-245-1669

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                               -----------------------------

To the Partners
Greensboro Properties, L.P., Phase II
Valdosta, Georgia

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Greensboro Properties, L.P., Phase II (a limited partnership), Federal ID No.: 58-1915804 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Greensboro Properties, L.P., Phase II as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 29, 2002 on our consideration of the Greensboro Properties, L.P., Phase II's internal control structure and a report dated January 29, 2002 on it's compliance with laws and regulations. These reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.

/s/ Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

January 29, 2002


Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
3488 N. Valdosta Rd. - P.O. Box 2241
Valdosta, GA 31604-2241
PHONE: 229-245-6040
FAX: 229-245-1669

                                 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                               -------------------------------

To the Partners
Dawson Elderly, L.P.
Dawson, Georgia

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Dawson Elderly, L.P. (a limited partnership), Federal ID No.: 58-1966658 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dawson Elderly, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued reports dated January 29, 2002 on our consideration of Dawson Elderly, L.P.'s internal control structure and a report dated January 29, 2002 on it's compliance with laws and regulations.

These reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.

/s/ Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

January 29, 2002


Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP
5565 Glenridge Connector, Suite 200
Atlanta, GA 30342
PHONE: 404-892-9651
FAX: 404-876-3913

                                  INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                                  -----------------------------

To the Partners
Piedmont Development Company of Lamar
    County, LTD.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of PIEDMONT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF LAMAR COUNTY, LTD. (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration's Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of PIEDMONT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF LAMAR COUNTY, LTD. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, its changes in partners' equity (deficit), and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 5, 2002, on our consideration of PIEDMONT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF LAMAR COUNTY, LTD.'s internal control and a report dated February 5, 2002, on its compliance with laws and regulations applicable to the financial statements.

/s/ Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP
Atlanta, Georgia

February 5, 2002


Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
516 Walnut Street - P.O. Box 775
Gadsden, AL 35902
PHONE: 256-543-3707
FAX: 256-543-9800

                                   INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                                   -----------------------------

To the Partners
Sylacauga Heritage Apartments Ltd.
Sylacauga, Alabama

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Sylacauga Heritage Apartments, Ltd., a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-061-631025601 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Sylacauga Heritage Apartments, Ltd., RHS Project No.: 01-061-631025601 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10 through 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 10, 2002 on our consideration of Sylacauga Heritage Apartments, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
Gadsden, Alabama
February 10, 2002


Pailet, Meunier and LeBlanc, L.L.P.
3421 N. Causeway Blvd., Suite 701
Metairie, LA 70002
PHONE: 504-837-0770
FAX: 504-837-7102

                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                             ------------------------------

To the Partners
LOGANSPORT SENIORS APARTMENTS

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of LOGANSPORT SENIORS APARTMENTS, RHS PROJECT NO. 22-016-721126743 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of LOGANSPORT SENIORS APARTMENTS as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information presented on pages 16 through 24, is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 12, 2002 on our consideration of LOGANSPORT SENIORS APARTMENTS's internal control and a report dated February 12, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations applicable to the financial statements.

/s/ Pailet, Meunier and LeBlanc, L.L.P
Certified Public Accountants

Metairie, Louisiana
February 12, 2002


Pailet, Meunier and LeBlanc, L.L.P.
3421 N. Causeway Blvd., Suite 701
Metairie, LA 70002
PHONE: 504-837-0770
FAX: 504-837-7102

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              -------------------------------

To the Partners
TARPON HEIGHTS APARTMENTS

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of TARPON HEIGHTS APARTMENTS, RHS PROJECT NO. 22-029-721103419 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of TARPON HEIGHTS APARTMENTS, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information presented on pages 16 through 26, is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 20, 2002 on our consideration of TARPON HEIGHTS APARTMENT's internal control and a report dated February 20, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations applicable to the financial statements.

/s/ Pailet, Meunier and LeBlanc, L.L.P.
Certified Public Accountants

Metairie, Louisiana
February 20, 2002


Pailet, Meunier and LeBlanc, L.L.P.
3421 N. Causeway Blvd., Suite 701
Metairie, LA 70002
PHONE: 504-837-0770
FAX: 504-837-7102

                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                            --------------------------------

To the Partners
THE OAKS APARTMENTS

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of THE OAKS APARTMENTS, RHS PROJECT NO. 22-002-721144868 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of THE OAKS APARTMENTS as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information presented on pages 16 through 26, is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 22, 2002 on our consideration of THE OAKS APARTMENTS' internal control and a report dated February 22, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations applicable to the financial statements.

/s/ Pailet, Meunier and LeBlanc, L.L.P.
Certified Public Accountants

Metairie, Louisiana
February 22, 2002


Pailet, Meunier and LeBlanc, L.L.P.
3421 N. Causeway Blvd., Suite 701
Metairie, LA 70002
PHONE: 504-837-0770
FAX: 504-837-7102

                                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              --------------------------------

To the Partners
SONORA SENIORS APARTMENTS

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of SONORA SENIORS APARTMENTS, RHS PROJECT NO. 51-018-721125480 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of SONORA SENIORS APARTMENTS as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information presented on pages 16 through 26, is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 22, 2002 on our consideration of SONORA SENIORS APARTMENT's internal control and a report dated February 22, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations applicable to the financial statements.

/s/ Pailet, Meunier and LeBlanc, L.L.P.
Certified Public Accountants

Metairie, Louisiana
February 22, 2002


Pailet, Meunier and LeBlanc, L.L.P.
3421 N. Causeway Blvd., Suite 701
Metairie, LA 70002
PHONE: 504-837-0770
FAX: 504-837-7102

                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                            --------------------------------

To the Partners
FREDERICKSBURG SENIORS APARTMENTS, LTD.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of FREDERICKSBURG SENIORS APARTMENTS, LTD., RHS PROJECT NO. 49-086-721150308 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of FREDERICKSBURG SENIORS APARTMENTS, LTD. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of its operations, changes in partners equity and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information presented on pages 16 through 26, is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 21, 2002 on our consideration of FREDERICKSBURG SENIORS APARTMENTS, LTD.'s internal control and a report dated February 21, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations applicable to the financial statements.

/s/ Pailet, Meunier and LeBlanc, L.L.P.
Certified Public Accountants

Metairie, Louisiana
February 21, 2002


Pailet, Meunier and LeBlanc, L.L.P.
3421 N. Causeway Blvd., Suite 701
Metairie, LA 70002
PHONE: 504-837-0770
FAX: 504-837-7102

                                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              --------------------------------

To the Partners
BRACKETTVILLE SENIORS APARTMENTS, LTD.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of BRACKETTVILLE SENIORS APARTMENTS, LTD., RHS PROJECT NO. 50-036-721150307 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of BRACKETTVILLE SENIORS APARTMENTS, LTD. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information presented on pages 16 through 24, is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 21, 2002 on our consideration of BRACKETTVILLE SENIORS APARTMENTS, LTD.'s internal control and a report dated February 21, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations applicable to the financial statements.

/s/ Pailet, Meunier and LeBlanc, L.L.P.
Certified Public Accountants

Metairie, Louisiana
February 21, 2002


Pailet, Meunier and LeBlanc, L.L.P.
3421 N. Causeway Blvd., Suite 701
Metairie, LA 70002
PHONE: 504-837-0770
FAX: 504-837-7102

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                             -------------------------------

To the Partners
TIMPSON SENIORS APARTMENTS

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of TIMPSON SENIORS APARTMENTS, RHS PROJECT NO. 51-010-721152460 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of TIMPSON SENIORS APARTMENTS as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of its operations and changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information presented on pages 16 through 26, is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 20, 2002 on our consideration of TIMPSON SENIORS APARTMENT's internal control and a report dated February 20, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations applicable to the financial statements.

/s/ Pailet, Meunier and LeBlanc, L.L.P.
Certified Public Accountants

Metairie, Louisiana
February 20, 2002


Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
5000 Rogers Avenue, Suite 700
Fort Smith, AR 72903-2079
PHONE: 501-452-1040
FAX: 501-452-5542

                                 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                               --------------------------------

Partners
Charleston Properties, A Limited Partnership
D/B/A Savannah Park of Charleston II
Fort Smith, Arkansas

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Charleston Properties, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Savannah Park of Charleston II as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Charleston Properties, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Savannah Park of Charleston II as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 7, 2002, on our consideration of the Partnerships' internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of the laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

/s/ Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
Certified Public Accountants

February 7, 2002


Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
5000 Rogers Avenue, Suite 700
Fort Smith, AR 72903-2079
PHONE: 501-452-1040
FAX: 501-452-5542

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              -------------------------------

Partners
Sallisaw Properties II, A Limited Partnership
D/B/A Mayfair Place II Apartments
Fort Smith, Arkansas

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Sallisaw Properties II, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Mayfair Place II Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Sallisaw Properties II, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Mayfair Place II Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 7, 2002, on our consideration of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of the laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

/s/ Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
Certified Public Accountants

February 7, 2002


Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
5000 Rogers Avenue, Suite 700
Fort Smith, AR 72903-2079
PHONE: 501-452-1040
FAX: 501-452-5542

                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                            -------------------------------

Partners
Pocola Properties, A Limited Partnership
D/B/A North Gate Apartments
Fort Smith, Arkansas

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Pocola Properties, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A North Gate Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pocola Properties, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A North Gate Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 7, 2002, on our consideration of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of the laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

/s/ Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
Certified Public Accountants

February 7, 2002


Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
5000 Rogers Avenue, Suite 700
Fort Smith, AR 72903-2079
PHONE: 501-452-1040
FAX: 501-452-5542

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                             --------------------------------

Partners
Poteau Properties II, A Limited Partnership
D/B/A North Pointe Apartments
Fort Smith, Arkansas

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Poteau Properties II, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A North Pointe Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Poteau Properties II, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A North Pointe Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 7, 2002, on our consideration of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of the laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

/s/ Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
Certified Public Accountants

February 7, 2002


Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
5000 Rogers Avenue, Suite 700
Fort Smith, AR 72903-2079
PHONE: 501-452-1040
FAX: 501-452-5542

                                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                             -------------------------------

Partners
Nowata Properties, A Limited Partnership
D/B/A Cross Creek II Apartments
Fort Smith, Arkansas

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Nowata Properties, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Cross Creek II Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Nowata Properties, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Cross Creek II Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 7, 2002, on our consideration of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of the laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Partnership will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 8, the Partnership has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 8. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
Certified Public Accountants

February 7, 2002


Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
5000 Rogers Avenue, Suite 700
Fort Smith, AR 72903-2079
PHONE: 501-452-1040
FAX: 501-452-5542

                                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              -------------------------------

Partners
Sallisaw Properties, A Limited Partnership
D/B/A Mayfair Place Apartments
Fort Smith, Arkansas

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Sallisaw Properties, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Mayfair Place Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Sallisaw Properties, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Mayfair Place Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 7, 2002, on our consideration of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of the laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

/s/ Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
Certified Public Accountants

February 7, 2002


Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
5000 Rogers Avenue, Suite 700
Fort Smith, AR 72903-2079
PHONE: 501-452-1040
FAX: 501-452-5542

                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                             ------------------------------

Partners
Roland Properties II, A Limited Partnership
D/B/A Garden Walk of Roland II
Fort Smith, Arkansas

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Roland Properties II, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Garden Walk of Roland II as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Roland Properties II, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Garden Walk of Roland II as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 7, 2002, on our consideration of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of the laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

/s/ Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
Certified Public Accountants

February 7, 2002


Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
5000 Rogers Avenue, Suite 700
Fort Smith, AR 72903-2079
PHONE: 501-452-1040
FAX: 501-452-5542

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                               -----------------------------

Partners
Stilwell Properties, A Limited Partnership
D/B/A Skywood Apartments
Fort Smith, Arkansas

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Stilwell Properties, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Skywood Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Stilwell Properties, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Skywood Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 7, 2002, on our consideration of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of the laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

/s/ Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
Certified Public Accountants

February 7, 2002


Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
5000 Rogers Avenue, Suite 700
Fort Smith, AR 72903-2079
PHONE: 501-452-1040
FAX: 501-452-5542

                                   INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                                   -----------------------------

Partners
Stilwell Properties II, A Limited Partnership
D/B/A Skywood II Apartments
Fort Smith, Arkansas

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Stilwell Properties II, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Skywood II Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Stilwell Properties II, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Skywood II Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 7, 2002, on our consideration of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of the laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

/s/ Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
Certified Public Accountant

February 7, 2002


Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
5000 Rogers Avenue, Suite 700
Fort Smith, AR 72903-2079
PHONE: 501-452-1040
FAX: 501-452-5542

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              ------------------------------

Partners
Westville Properties, A Limited Partnership
D/B/A Greystone Place Apartments
Fort Smith, Arkansas

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Westville Properties, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Greystone Place Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Westville Properties, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Greystone Place Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 7, 2002, on our consideration of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of the laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

/s/ Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
Certified Public Accountants

February 7, 2002


Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
5000 Rogers Avenue, Suite 700
Fort Smith, AR 72903-2079
PHONE: 501-452-1040
FAX: 501-452-5542

                                 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                                -------------------------------

Partners
Mill Creek Properties V, A Limited Partnership
D/B/A Pleasant Grove Apartments
Fort Smith, Arkansas

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Mill Creek Properties V, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Pleasant Grove Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Mill Creek Properties V, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Pleasant Grove Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 7, 2002, on our consideration of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of the laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

/s/ Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
Certified Public Accountants

February 7, 2002


Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
5000 Rogers Avenue, Suite 700
Fort Smith, AR 72903-2079
PHONE: 501-452-1040
FAX: 501-452-5542

                                  INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                                 -------------------------------

Partners
Parsons Properties, A Limited Partnership
D/B/A Savannah Park of Parsons
Fort Smith, Arkansas

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Parsons Properties, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Savannah Park of Parsons as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Parsons Properties, A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Savannah Park of Parsons as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 7, 2002, on our consideration of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

/s/ Baird, Kurtz, & Dobson, LLP
Certified Public Accountants

February 7, 2002


Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
3488 N. Valdosta Road - P.O. Box 2241
Valdosta, GA 31604-2241
PHONE: 229-245-6040
FAX: 229-245-1669

                                 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                                ------------------------------

To the Partners
Inverness Club, Ltd., L.P.
(A Georgia Limited Partnership)
Valdosta, Georgia

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Inverness Club, Ltd., L.P. (A Georgia Limited Partnership), FmHA Project No.: 09-009-581808620, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Inverness Club, Ltd., L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 16, 2002 on our consideration of Inverness Club, Ltd., L.P.'s internal control structure and a report dated January 16, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations. These reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.

/s/ Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

January 16, 2002


Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
3488 N. Valdosta Road - P.O. Box 2241
Valdosta, GA 31604-2241
PHONE: 229-245-6040
FAX: 229-245-1669

                                 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                                ------------------------------

To the Partners
Carrollton Club, Ltd., L.P.
(A Georgia Limited Partnership)
Valdosta, Georgia

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Carrollton Club, Ltd., L.P., (A Georgia Limited Partnership), FmHA Project No.: 10-22-58188314, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' (deficit) and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Carrollton Club, Ltd., L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 16, 2002 on our consideration of Carrollton Club, Ltd., L.P.'s internal control structure and a report dated January 16, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations. These reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.

/s/ Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

January 16, 2002


Grana & Teibel, CPAs, P.C.
300 Corporate Pkwy., Suite 116 N.
Amherst, NY 14226
PHONE: 716-862-4270
FAX: 716-862-0007

                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                             ------------------------------

To The Partners of
Lewiston Limited Partnership
Case No. 37-032-161349932
and
RD Rural Housing Director
166 Washington Avenue
Batavia, New York 14020

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Lewiston Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital (deficiency), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lewiston Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 16, 2002, on our consideration of Lewiston Limited Partnership's internal control structure and a report dated January 16, 2002, on its compliance with laws and regulations.

/s/ Grana & Teibel, CPAs, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

January 16, 2002


Miller & Rose, P.L.L.C.
1309 E. Race Avenue
Searcy, AR 72143
PHONE: 501-268-8356
FAX: 501-268-9362

                                 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                                --------------------------------

Partners
Lancaster House, An Arkansas Limited Partnership
D/B/A Pebble Creek Apartments
351 East 4th Street
Mountain Home, AR 72653

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Lancaster House, An Arkansas Limited Partnership, D/B/A Pebble Creek Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and for the years then ended, as listed in the table of contents. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statements presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lancaster House, An Arkansas Limited Partnership, D/B/A Pebble Creek Apartments as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated March 20, 2002 on our consideration of Lancaster House, An Arkansas Limited Partnership, D/B/A Pebble Creek Apartments' internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants.

/s/ Miller & Rose, P.L.L.C.
Certified Public Accountants

March 20, 2002


Leavitt, Christensen & Co.
9100 W. Blackeagle Dr.
Boise, ID 83709
PHONE: 208-322-6769
FAX: 208-322-7307

                                  INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                                 ------------------------------

Managing General Partner
Haines Associates Limited Partnership
Boise, Idaho

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Haines Associates Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the USDA, Rural Housing Service Audit Program issued in December, 1989. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and the significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Haines Associates Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued reports dated January 31, 2002 on our consideration of Haines Associates Limited Partnership's internal control and on its compliance with laws and regulations. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

The partnership has filed tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service which allow the partners to receive the benefit of a low income housing tax credit. Because the qualifying standards of the low income housing tax credit are different than the requirements of the loan agreement and the interest credit agreements, and due to the fact that the low income housing tax credit relates to income taxes which are the responsibility of the individual partners, the scope of these audits were not designed or intended to audit the compliance with the various low income housing tax credit laws. Therefore, these audits can not be relied on to give assurances with regard to compliance with any low income housing tax credit laws.

/s/ Leavitt, Christensen & Co.
Certified Public Accountants
January 31, 2002


Bernard Robinson & Company, L.L.P.
109 Muirs Chapel Rd. - P.O. Box 19608
Greensboro, NC 27410 (27419)
PHONE: 336-294-4494
FAX: 336-547-0840

                                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              -------------------------------

To the Partners
Woodcrest Associates of South Boston, VA, Ltd.
Charlotte, North Carolina

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Woodcrest Associates of South Boston, VA, Ltd.(a Virginia limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Woodcrest Associates of South Boston, VA, Ltd. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 31, 2002, on our consideration of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplementary information listed in the table of contents is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements of the Partnership. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Bernard Robinson & Company, L.L.P.
Certified Public Accountants

January 31, 2002


Thomas C. Cunningham, CPA PC
23 Moore Street
Bristol, VA 24201
PHONE: 276-669-5531
FAX: 276-669-5576

                             INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                           -------------------------------

To the Partners
Norton Green Limited Partnership

I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Norton Green Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audits.

I conducted my audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audits provide a reasonable basis for my opinion.

In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Norton Green Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' deficit, and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, I have also issued my report dated February 15, 2002 on my consideration of Norton Green Limited Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and on my tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Thomas C. Cunningham, CPA PC
Certified Public Accountant

February 15, 2002


Thomas C. Cunningham, CPA PC
23 Moore Street
Bristol, VA 24201
PHONE: 276-669-5531
FAX: 276-669-5576

                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                            -------------------------------

To the Partners
Jonesville Manor Limited Partnership

I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Jonesville Manor Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audits.

I conducted my audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audits provide a reasonable basis for my opinion.

In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Jonesville Manor Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' deficit, and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, I have also issued my report dated February 15, 2002 on my consideration of Jonesville Manor Limited Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and on my tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Thomas C. Cunningham, CPA PC
Certified Public Accountant

February 15, 2002


Thomas C. Cunningham, CPA PC
23 Moore Street
Bristol, VA 24201
PHONE: 276-669-5531
FAX: 276-669-5576

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                               ----------------------------

To the Partners
Blacksburg Terrace Limited Partnership

I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Blacksburg Terrace Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audits.

I conducted my audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audits provide a reasonable basis for my opinion.

In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Blacksburg Terrace Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' deficit, and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, I have also issued my report dated February 15, 2002 on my consideration of Blacksburg Terrace Limited Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and on my tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Thomas C. Cunningham, CPA PC
Certified Public Accountants

February 15, 2002


Thomas C. Cunningham, CPA PC
23 Moore Street
Bristol, VA 24201
PHONE: 276-669-5531
FAX: 276-669-5576

                                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                               -------------------------------

To the Partners
Newport Village Limited Partnership

I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Newport Village Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audits.

I conducted my audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audits provide a reasonable basis for my opinion.

In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Newport Village Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' deficit, and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, I have also issued my report dated February 15, 2002 on my consideration of Newport Village Limited Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and on my tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Thomas C. Cunningham, CPA PC
Certified Public Accountants

February 15, 2002


Lou Ann Montey and Associates, P.C.
8400 N. Mopac Expressway, Suite 304
Austin, TX 78759
PHONE: 512-338-0044
FAX: 512-338-5395

                                  INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                                  -----------------------------

To The Partners
Zapata Housing, Ltd.-(A Texas Limited Partnership)
Burnet, Texas

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Zapata Housing, Ltd.-(A Texas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income (loss), partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards and Government Auditing Standards as issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Zapata Housing, Ltd.- (A Texas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 24, 2002, on our consideration of the internal control structure of Zapata Housing, Ltd.- (A Texas Limited Partnership) and a report dated January 24, 2002, on its compliance with laws and regulations.

/s/ Lou Ann Montey and Associates, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

Austin, Texas
January 24, 2002


Lou Ann Montey and Associates, P.C.
8400 N. Mopac Expressway, Suite 304
Austin, TX 78759
PHONE: 512-338-0044
FAX: 512-338-5395

                                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                               ------------------------------

To the Partners
Sinton Retirement, Ltd.-(A Texas Limited Partnership)
Burnet, Texas

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Sinton Retirement, Ltd.- (A Texas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income (loss), partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards and Government Auditing Standards as issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Sinton Retirement, Ltd.- (A Texas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 19, 2002, on our consideration of the internal control structure of Sinton Retirement, Ltd.- (A Texas Limited Partnership) and a report dated January 19, 2002, on its compliance with laws and regulations.

/s/ Lou Ann Montey and Associates, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

Austin, Texas
January 19, 2002


Gubler and Carter, P.C.
7001 South 900 East, Suite 240
Midvale, UT 84047
PHONE: 801-566-5866
FAX: 801-561-8693

                                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                                -----------------------------

TO THE PARTNERS
SMITHFIELD GREENBRIAR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Smithfield Greenbriar Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related statements of income, changes in partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statements presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly in all material respects, the financial position of Smithfield Greenbriar Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of its operations, changes in partners' capital, and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our reports dated February 1, 2002 on our consideration of Smithfield Greenbriar Limited Partnership's internal control and on its compliance with laws and regulations.

Our audits were conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplementary information shown on pages 13 through 15 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements of Smithfield Greenbriar Limited Partnership. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Gubler and Carter, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
Salt Lake City, Utah
February 1, 2002


Simmons and Clubb
410 S. Orchard, Suite 156
Boise, ID 83705
PHONE: 208-336-6800
FAX: 208-343-2381

                                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              --------------------------------

To the Partners
Mountain Crest Limited Partnership
Boise, Idaho

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Mountain Crest Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Mountain Crest Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued reports dated January 29, 2002, on our consideration of Mountain Crest Limited Partnership's internal controls and compliance with laws and regulations. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with the Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

The partnership's tax returns have been filed allowing the partners to claim a benefit of a low income housing tax credit. Because the compliance and qualification standards of the low income tax housing tax credit are not related to the interest credit agreement and loan agreement, and because the low income housing tax credit related to income taxes which are the responsibility of each individual partner, the scope of our audit was not designed or intended to audit the partnerships compliance with the low income housing tax credit laws. Accordingly, our audit cannot be relied upon to give assurance with regard to the partnerships compliance with any of the low income housing tax credit laws.

/s/ Roger Clubb
Simmons and Clubb
Certified Public Accountants
Boise, Idaho
January 29, 2002


Berberich Trahan & Co., P.A.
3630 S.W. Burlingame Road

Topeka, KS 66611-2050
PHONE: 785-234-3427
FAX: 785-233-1768

                                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              -------------------------------

The Partners
Eudora Senior Housing, L.P.:

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Eudora Senior Housing, L.P., RHS Project No. 18-023-481065040, D/B/A Pinecrest Apartments II (Partnership), as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eudora Senior Housing, L.P., RHS Project No. 18-023-481065040, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 17, 2002 on our consideration of Eudora Senior Housing, L.P.'s internal control and a report dated January 17, 2002 on its compliance with laws, regulations and contracts. These reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of this audit.

Berberich Trahan & Co., P.A.
Certified Public Accountants

Topeka, Kansas
January 15, 2002
Audit Principal: Virginia A. Powell
IA Federal ID Number: 48-1066439


Baird, Kurtz & Dobson, LLP
5000 Rogers Avenue, Suite 700
Fort Smith, AR 72903-2079
PHONE: 501-452-1040
FAX: 501-452-5542

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                               -----------------------------

Partners
Spring Hill Housing, L.P., A Limited Partnership
D/B/A Spring Hill Housing II
Fort Smith, Arkansas

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Spring Hill Housing, L.P., A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Spring Hill Housing II as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Spring Hill Housing, L.P., A Limited Partnership, D/B/A Spring Hill Housing II as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 7, 2002, on our consideration of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

/s/ Baird, Kurtz & Dobson, LLP
Certified Public Accountants

February 7, 2002


Eide Bailly LLP
200 East 10th St., Suite 500 - P.O. Box 5126
Sioux Falls, SD 57117-5126
PHONE: 605-339-1999
FAX: 605-339-1306

                                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                               -------------------------------

The Partners
Sunchase II, Ltd.
Watertown, South Dakota

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Sunchase II, Ltd. (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Sunchase II, Ltd. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 24, 2002 on our consideration of Sunchase II, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and our test of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

Our audits were performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplementary information on pages 11 and 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements of Sunchase II, Ltd. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Eide Bailly LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Sioux Falls, South Dakota
January 24, 2002


Eide Bailly LLP
200 East 10th St., Suite 500 - P.O. Box 5126
Sioux Falls, SD 57117-5126
PHONE: 605-339-1999
FAX: 605-339-1306

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              ------------------------------

The Partners
Courtyard, Ltd.
Huron, South Dakota

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Courtyard, Ltd. (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Courtyard, Ltd. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 28, 2002, on our consideration of Courtyard, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

Our audits were performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplementary information on pages 13 and 14 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements of Courtyard, Ltd. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Eide Bailly LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Sioux Falls, South Dakota
January 28, 2002


Eide Bailly LLP
200 East 10th St., Suite 500 - P.O. Box 5126
Sioux Falls, SD 57117-5126
PHONE: 605-339-1999
FAX: 605-339-1306

                                 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                                 ---------------------------

The Partners
Sunrise, Ltd.
Yankton, South Dakota

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Sunrise Ltd. (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Sunrise, Ltd. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 24, 2002 on our consideration of Sunrise, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

Our audits were performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplementary information on pages 12 and 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements of Sunrise, Ltd. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Eide Bailly LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Sioux Falls, South Dakota
January 24, 2002


Johnson, Hickey & Murchison, P.C.
651 East Fourth Street, Suite 200
Chattanooga, TN 37403-1924
PHONE: 423-756-0052
FAX: 423-267-5945

                             INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                             -----------------------------

To the General Partners of
Southwood, L.P.:

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Southwood, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Southwood, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 14, 2002, on our consideration of the partnership's internal control over financial reporting and on its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

/s/ Johnson, Hickey & Murchison, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

January 14, 2002


Bob T. Robinson
2084 Dunbarton Drive
Jackson, MS 39216
PHONE: 601-982-3875
FAX: 601-982-3876

                                  INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                                 -------------------------------

To the Partners
Hazlehurst Manor, L.P.

I have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Hazlehurst Manor L.P. (RD Case Number 28-015-640803081), as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audit.

I conducted my audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audits provide a reasonable basis for my opinion.

In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Hazlehurst Manor, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, I have also issued a report dated February 1, 2002 on my consideration of the partnership's internal control structure and a report dated February 1, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations.

My audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information is presented for the purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements of Hazlehurst Manor, L.P. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and, in my opinion, is fairly presented in all material respects in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.

The annual budgets of Hazlehurst Manor, L.P. included in the accompanying prescribed form RD1930-7 (Rev 10-96) have not been compiled or examined by me, and I do not express any form of assurance on them. In addition they may contain departures from guidelines for presentation of prospective financial information established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The actual results may vary from the presentation and the variations may be material.

/s/ Bob T. Robinson
Certified Public Accountant

February 1, 2002
Jackson, Mississippi


Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
516 Walnut Street - P.O. Box 775
Gadsden, AL 35902
PHONE: 256-543-3707
FAX: 256-543-9800

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              ------------------------------

To the Partners
Lakeshore Apartments Ltd.
Tuskegee, Alabama

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Lakeshore Apartments, Ltd. a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-044-631014228 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lakeshore Apartments, Ltd., RHS Project No.: 01-044-631014228 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 9 through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 11, 2002 on our consideration of Lakeshore Apartments, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
Gadsden, Alabama
February 11, 2002


Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
16 Walnut Street - P.O. Box 775
Gadsden, AL 35902
PHONE: 256-543-3707
FAX: 256-543-9800

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              ------------------------------

To the Partners
Countrywood Apartments Ltd.
Centerville, Alabama

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Countrywood Apartments, Ltd. a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-004-630943678 December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Countrywood Apartments, Ltd. RHS Project No.: 01-004-630943678 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10 through 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 28, 2002 on our consideration of Countrywood Apartments, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Certified Public Accountant

Gadsden, Alabama
February 28, 2002


Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
516 Walnut Street - P.O. Box 775
Gadsden, AL 35902
PHONE: 256-543-3707
FAX: 256-543-9800

                                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                             --------------------------------

To the Partners
Wildwood Apartments Ltd.
Pineville, Louisiana

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Wildwood Apartments, Ltd., a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 22-040-630954515 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Wildwood Apartments, Ltd., RHS Project No.: 22-040-630954515 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10 through 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 21, 2002 on our consideration of Wildwood Apartments, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
Gadsden, Alabama
February 21, 2002


Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
516 Walnut Street - P.O. Box 775
Gadsden, AL 35902
PHONE: 256-543-3707
FAX: 256-543-9800

                                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              --------------------------------

To the Partners
Meadowcrest Apartments Ltd.
Luverne, Alabama

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Meadowcrest Apartments, Ltd. a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-021-631047203 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Meadowcrest Apartments, Ltd. RHS Project No.: 01-021-631047203 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10 through 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 11, 2002 on our consideration of Meadowcrest Apartments, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
Gadsden, Alabama
February 11, 2002


Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
2026 Connecticut - P.O. Box 3766
Joplin, MO 64803
PHONE: 417-623-8666
FAX: 417-623-4075

                                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              -------------------------------

To the Partners
Seneca Apartments, L.P
Joplin, Missouri 64804

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Seneca Apartments, L.P. (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Seneca Apartments, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued our report dated February 19, 2002 on our consideration of Seneca Apartments, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The Supplemental Letter on pages 14-16 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

February 19, 2002


Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
2026 Connecticut - P.O. Box 3766
Joplin, MO 64803
PHONE: 417-623-8666
FAX: 417-623-4075

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                           ----------------------------------

To the Partners
Carthage Seniors, L.P.
Joplin, Missouri 64804

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Carthage Seniors, L.P. (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Carthage Seniors, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued our report dated February 19, 2002 on our consideration of Carthage Seniors, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The Supplemental Letter on pages 14-16 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

February 19, 2002


Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
2026 Connecticut - P.O. Box 3766
Joplin, MO 64803
PHONE: 417-623-8666
FAX: 417-623-4075

                                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              --------------------------------

To the Partners
Southwest City Apartments, L.P.
Joplin, Missouri 64804

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Southwest City Apartments, L.P. (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Southwest City Apartments, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued our report dated February 19, 2002 on our consideration of Southwest City Apartments, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The Supplemental Letter on pages 14-16 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

February 19, 2002


Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
2026 Connecticut - P.O. Box 3766
Joplin, MO 64803
PHONE: 417-623-8666
FAX: 417-623-4075

                                 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                                -----------------------------

To the Partners
Pineville Apartments, L.P.
Joplin, Missouri 64804

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Pineville Apartments, L.P. (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pineville Apartments, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued our report dated February 19, 2002 on our consideration of Pineville Apartments, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The Supplemental Letter on pages 14-16 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

February 19, 2002


Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
2026 Connecticut - P.O. Box 3766
Joplin, MO 64803
PHONE: 417-623-8666
FAX: 417-623-4075

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              ------------------------------

To the Partners
Monett Seniors, L.P
Joplin, Missouri 64804

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Monett Seniors, L.P. (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Monett Seniors, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued our report dated February 19, 2002 on our consideration of Monett Seniors, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The Supplemental Letter on pages 14-16 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

February 19, 2002


Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
2026 Connecticut - P.O. Box 3766
Joplin, MO 64803
PHONE: 417-623-8666
FAX: 417-623-4075

                                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              -------------------------------

To the Partners
Columbus Seniors, L.P.
Joplin, Missouri 64804

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Columbus Seniors, L.P. (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Columbus Seniors, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued our report dated February 19, 2002 on our consideration of Columbus Seniors, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming and opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The Supplemental Letter on pages 14-16 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

February 19, 2002


Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
2026 Connecticut - P.O. Box 3766
Joplin, MO 64803
PHONE: 417-623-8666
FAX: 417-623-4075

                                 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                                -------------------------------

To the Partners
Arma Seniors, L.P.
Joplin, Missouri 64804

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Arma Seniors, L.P. (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Arma Seniors, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued our report dated February 19, 2002 on our consideration of Arma Seniors, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The Supplemental Letter on pages 14-16 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Turk & Giles, CPAs, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

February 19, 2002


Suellen Doubet, CPA
603 West Cherokee Street
Wagoner, OK 74467
PHONE: 918-485-8085
FAX: 918-485-3092

                             INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                          ---------------------------------

To the Partners
of Yorkshire Retirement Village:

I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Yorkshire Retirement Village (an Oklahoma Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statement of operations, partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audits.

I conducted my audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audit provides a reasonable basis for my opinion.

In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Yorkshire Retirement Village as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

My audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplementary information, "The Schedule of Maintenance Expenses" has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in my opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, I have also issued a report dated March 24, 2002 on my consideration of Yorkshire Retirement Village's compliance and on internal control over financial reporting. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of my audit.

/s/ Suellen Doubet, CPA
Wagoner, OK 74467

March 24, 2002


Chester M. Kearney
12 Dyer Street
Presque Isle, ME 04769-1550
PHONE: 207-764-3171
FAX: 207-764-6362

                            INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                          --------------------------------

Rural Development Group
d/b/a Ashland Estates
Caribou, Maine
To the Partners

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Rural Development Group, d/b/a Ashland Estates, (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Rural Development Group, d/b/a Ashland Estates as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, partners' deficit and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 28, 2002 on our consideration of Rural Development Group, d/b/a Ashland Estates' internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.

/s/ Chester M. Kearney
Certified Public Accountants

Presque Isle, Maine
January 28, 2002


Richard A. Strauss
1310 Lady Street
9th Floor, Keenan Building
Columbia, SC 29201
PHONE: 803-779-7472
FAX: 803-252-6171

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              -------------------------------

To the Partners
Scarlett Oaks Limited Partnership
Lexington, South Carolina

I have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Scarlett Oaks Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, expense and partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of Scarlett Oaks Limited Partnership's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audit.

I conducted my audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audits provide a reasonable basis for my opinion.

In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Scarlett Oaks Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, I have also issued a report dated February 25, 2002, on my consideration of Scarlett Oaks Limited Partnership's internal control and a report dated February 25, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations.

This report is intended for the information of management and the Department of Agriculture, Rural Development. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited.

Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Richard A. Strauss
Certified Public Accountants

Columbia, South Carolina
February 25, 2002


David G. Pelliccione, C.P.A., P.C.
340 Eisenhower Drive, Suite 220
Savannah, GA 31406
PHONE: 912-354-2334
FAX: 912-354-2443

                             INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                             -----------------------------

To The Partners
Brooks Hill Apartments, L.P.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of BROOKS HILL APARTMENTS, L.P., as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related statement of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards of the United States and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. These standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of BROOKS HILL APARTMENTS, L.P., as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 15, 2002, on our consideration of BROOKS HILL APARTMENTS, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements of BROOKS HILL APARTMENTS, L.P., taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 9 through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ David G. Pelliccione, C.P.A., P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
Savannah, Georgia
February 15, 2002


K.B. Parrish & Co. LLP
6840 Eagle Highlands Way
Indianapolis, IN 46254-2693
PHONE: 317-347-5200
FAX: 317-347-5211

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              ------------------------------

To the Partners of
Village Apartments of Seymour II, L.P.
(A Limited Partnership)

We have audited the balance sheets of Village Apartments of Seymour II, L.P. (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, changes in partnership capital (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rural Development Audit Program. Those standards and the audit program require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Village Apartments of Seymour II, L.P. at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partnership capital (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 11, 2002 on our consideration of the partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with laws and regulations. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

Respectfully submitted,
/s/ K.B. Parrish & Company LLP
Certified Public Accountants

Indianapolis, Indiana
January 11, 2002


Scheiner, Mister & Grandizio, P.A.
1300 Bellona Avenue
Lutherville, MD 21093
PHONE: 410-494-0885
FAX: 410-321-9024

                                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                                -----------------------------

To the Partners
Frazer Elderly Limited Partnership
Reisterstown, Maryland

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Frazer Elderly Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Frazer Elderly Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' capital, and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 15, 2002 on our consideration of the Partnership's internal control and a report dated January 15, 2002 on its compliance with laws and regulations. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering results of our audit.

Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplementary information shown on pages 9 - 9A is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements of the Partnership. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Scheiner, Mister & Grandizio, P.A.
Certified Public Accountants
January 15, 2002


Fentress, Brown, CPAs & Associates, LLC
8001 Ravines Edge Court, Suite 112
Columbus, OH 43235-5421
PHONE: 614-825-0011
FAX: 614-825-0014

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                             --------------------------------

To the Partners of                                        Rural Housing Service
Bryan Senior Village Limited Partnership                  Servicing Office
DBA Plaza Senior Village Apartments                       Findlay, Ohio
Mansfield, Ohio

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Bryan Senior Village Limited Partnership (a limited partnership), DBA Plaza Senior Village Apartments, Case No. 41-086-341561720, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration "Audit Program" issued in December 1989. Those standards require that we plan and perform our audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Bryan Senior Village Limited Partnership, DBA Plaza Senior Village Apartments, Case No. 41-086-341561720, at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration "Audit Program,", issued in December 1989, we have also issued a report dated January 30, 2002, on our consideration of Bryan Senior Village Limited Partnership's internal control and a report dated January 30, 2002, on its compliance with specific requirements applicable to Rural Housing Service Programs. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

/s/ Fentress, Brown, CPAs & Associates, LLC
Certified Public Accountants

Columbus, Ohio
January 30, 2002


Fentress, Brown, CPAs & Associates, LLC
8001 Ravines Edge Court, Suite 112
Columbus, OH 43235-5421
PHONE: 614-825-0011
FAX: 614-825-0014

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              ------------------------------

To the Partners of                                         Rural Housing Service
Brubaker Square Limited Partnership                        Servicing Office
DBA Brubaker Square Apartments                             Hillsboro, Ohio
Mansfield, Ohio

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Brubaker Square Limited Partnership (a limited partnership), DBA Brubaker Square Apartments, Case No. 41-092-341561718, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, changes in partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration "Audit Program" issued in December 1989. Those standards require that we plan and perform our audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Brubaker Square Limited Partnership, DBA Brubaker Square Apartments, Case No. 41-092-341561718, at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration "Audit Program,", issued in December 1989, we have also issued a report dated January 30, 2002, on our consideration of Brubaker Square Limited Partnership's internal control and a report dated January 30, 2002, on its compliance with specific requirements applicable to Rural Housing Service Programs. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

/s/ Fentress, Brown, CPAs & Associates, LLC
Certified Public Accountants

Columbus, Ohio
January 30, 2002


Fentress, Brown, CPAs & Associates, LLC
8001 Ravines Edge Court, Suite 112
Columbus, OH 43235-5421
PHONE: 614-825-0011
FAX: 614-825-0014

                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                            -------------------------------

To the Partners of                                      Rural Housing Service
Villa Allegra Limited Partnership                       Servicing Office
DBA Villa Allegra Apartments                            Findlay, Ohio
Mansfield, Ohio

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Villa Allegra Limited Partnership (a limited partnership), DBA Villa Allegra Apartments, Case No. 41-054-341561716, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration "Audit Program" issued in December 1989. Those standards require that we plan and perform our audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Villa Allegra Limited Partnership, DBA Villa Allegra Apartments, Case No. 41-054-341561716, at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit),and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration "Audit Program," issued in December 1989, we have also issued a report dated January 30, 2002, on our consideration of Villa Allegra Limited Partnership's internal control and a report dated January 30, 2002, on its compliance with specific requirements applicable to Rural Housing Service Programs. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

/s/ Fentress, Brown, CPAs & Associates, LLC
Certified Public Accountants

Columbus, Ohio
January 30, 2002


Fentress, Brown, CPAs & Associates, LLC
8001 Ravines Edge Court, Suite 112
Columbus, OH 43235-5421
PHONE: 614-825-0011
FAX: 614-825-0014

                             INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                           --------------------------------

To the Partners of                                       Rural Housing Service
Logan Place Limited Partnership                          Servicing Office
DBA Logan Place Apartments                               Marietta, Ohio
Mansfield, Ohio

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Logan Place Limited Partnership (a limited partnership), DBA Logan Place Apartments, Case No. 41-037-341643639, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration "Audit Program" issued in December, 1989. Those standards require that we plan and perform our audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Logan Place Limited Partnership, DBA Logan Place Apartments, Case No. 41-037-341643639, at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit),and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration "Audit Program," issued in December 1989, we have also issued a report dated January 30, 2002, on our consideration of Logan Place Limited Partnership's internal control and a report dated January 30, 2002, on its compliance with specific requirements applicable to Rural Housing Service Programs. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

Fentress, Brown, CPA's & Associates, LLC
Certified Public Accountants

Columbus, Ohio
January 30, 2002


Duggan, Joiner & Company
334 N.W. Third Avenue
Ocala, FL 34475
PHONE: 352-732-0171
FAX: 352-867-1370

                                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                                ------------------------------

To the Partners
Flagler Beach Villas RRH, Ltd.

We have audited the accompanying basic financial statements of Flagler Beach Villas RRH, Ltd., as of and for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, as listed in the table of contents. These basic financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the basic financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Flagler Beach Villas RRH, Ltd. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 31, 2002 on our consideration of Flagler Beach Villas RRH, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The additional information presented on pages 10 to 15 is presented for the purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The information on pages 10 to 14 has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The information on page 15, which is of a nonaccounting nature, has not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements, and we express no opinion on it.

/s/ Duggan, Joiner & Company
Certified Public Accountants

January 31, 2002


Smith, Lambright & Associates, P.C.
505 E. Tyler - P.O. Box 912
Athens, TX 75751
PHONE: 903-675-5674
FAX: 903-675-5676

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                            ---------------------------------

To the Partners
Elkhart Apartments Limited
700 South Palestine
Athens, Texas 75751

We have audited the accompanying Balance Sheet of the Elkhart Apartments Limited as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related Statements of Income and Expenses, Changes in Partner's Equity (Deficit), and Cash Flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Elkhart Apartments Limited's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and "U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration - Audit Program." Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Elkhart Apartments Limited as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 20, 2002 on our consideration of the Elkhart Apartments Limited's compliance and on internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

Our audit was performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements of the Elkhart Apartments Limited, taken as a whole. The accompanying supplemental letter is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Smith, Lambright & Associates, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
February 20, 2002


Smith, Lambright & Associates, P.C.
505 E. Tyler - P.O. Box 912
Athens, TX 75751
PHONE: 903-675-5674
FAX: 903-675-5676

                                 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                                -------------------------------

To the Owners
South Timber Ridge Apartments, Ltd.
700 South Palestine
Athens, Texas 75751

We have audited the accompanying Balance Sheet of South Timber Ridge Apartments, Ltd. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related Statements of Income and Expenses, Changes in Partner's Equity (Deficit), and Cash Flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of South Timber Ridge Apartments, Ltd.'s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and "U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration - Audit Program." Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of South Timber Ridge Apartments, Ltd. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated March 12, 2002 on our consideration of South Timber Ridge Apartments, Ltd.'s compliance and on internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

Our audit was performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements of South Timber Ridge Apartments, Ltd., taken as a whole. The accompanying supplemental letter is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Smith, Lambright & Associates, P.C.
Certified Public Accountant
March 12, 2002


Smith, Lambright & Associates, P.C.
505 E. Tyler-P.O. Box 912
Athens, TX 75751
PHONE: 903-675-5674
FAX: 903-675-5676

                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              ----------------------------

To the Partners
Heritage Drive South, Limited
700 South Palestine
Athens, Texas 75751

We have audited the accompanying Balance Sheet of Heritage Drive South, Limited as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related Statements of Income and Expenses, Changes in Partner's Equity (Deficit), and Cash Flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of Heritage Drive South, Limited's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and "U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration - Audit Program." Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Heritage Drive South, Limited as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 25, 2002 on our consideration of Heritage Drive South, Limited's compliance and on internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

Our audit was performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements of Heritage Drive South, Limited, taken as a whole. The accompanying supplemental information is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Smith, Lambright & Associates. P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
February 25, 2002


Miller, Mayer, Sullivan & Stevens LLP
2365 Harrodsburg Rd.
Lexington, KY 40504-3399
PHONE: 859-223-3095
FAX: 859-223-2143

                             INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                           --------------------------------

To the Partners                                        Rural Development
Goodwater Falls, Ltd.                                  London, Kentucky

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Goodwater Falls, Ltd., (a limited partnership) Case No. 20-067-621424606, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards for financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Goodwater Falls, Ltd. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 1, 2002 on our consideration of Goodwater Falls, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.

Our audits were conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental data included in this report is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements, and in our opinion, is presented fairly, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Miller, Mayer, Sullivan & Stevens, LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Lexington, Kentucky
February 1, 2002


Lou Ann Montey and Associates, P.C.
8400 N. Mopac Expressway, Suite 304
Austin, TX 78759
PHONE 512-338-0044
FAX 512-338-5395

                                 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                                --------------------------------

To The Partners
Frankston Retirement, Ltd. - (A Texas Limited Partnership)
Burnet, Texas

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Frankston Retirement Ltd. - (A Texas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income (loss), partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audit in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards and Government Auditing Standards as issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Frankston Retirement, Ltd. - (A Texas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 21, 2002, on our consideration of the internal control structure of Frankston Retirement, Ltd. - (A Texas Limited Partnership) and a report dated January 21, 2002, on its compliance with laws and regulations.

Lou Ann Montey and Associates, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

Austin, Texas
January 21, 2002


Lou Ann Montey and Associates, P.C.
8400 N. Mopac Expressway, Suite 304
Austin, TX 78759
PHONE 512-338-0043154
FAX 512-338-5395

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                              ------------------------------

To The Partners
Wallis Housing, Ltd. - (A Texas Limited Partnership)
Burnet, Texas

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Wallis Housing, Ltd. - (A Texas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income (loss), partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards and Government Auditing Standards as issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Wallis Housing, Ltd. - (A Texas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 23, 2002, on our consideration of the internal control structure of Wallis Housing, Ltd. - (A Texas Limited Partnership) and a report dated January 23, 2002, on its compliance with laws and regulations.

Lou Ann Montey and Associates, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

Austin, Texas
January 23, 2002


Lou Ann Montey and Associates, P.C.
8400 N. Mopac Expressway, Suite 304
Austin, TX 78759
PHONE 512-338-0044
FAX 512-338-5395

                            INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                            ------------------------------

To The Partners
Menard Retirement, Ltd. - (A Texas Limited Partnership)
Burnet, Texas

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Menard Retirement, Ltd. - (A Texas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related statements of income (loss), partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audits in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards and Government Auditing Standards as issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Menard Retirement, Ltd. - (A Texas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 22, 2002, on our consideration of the internal control structure of Menard Retirement, Ltd. - (A Texas Limited Partnership) and a report dated January 22, 2002, on its compliance with laws and regulations.

Lou Ann Montey and Associates, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

Austin, Texas
January 22, 2002


Lou Ann Montey and Associates, P.C.
8400 N. Mopac Expressway, Suite 304
Austin, TX 78759
PHONE 512-338-0044
FAX 512-338-5395

                             INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                            -------------------------------

To The Partners
Sinton Retirement, Ltd. - (A Texas Limited Partnership)
Burnet, Texas

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Sinton Retirement, Ltd. - (A Texas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related statements of income (loss), partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audits in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards and Government Auditing Standards as issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Sinton Retirement, Ltd. - (A Texas Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 19, 2002, on our consideration of the internal control structure of Sinton Retirement, Ltd. - (A Texas Limited Partnership) and a report dated January 19, 2002, on its compliance with laws and regulations.

Lou Ann Montey and Associates, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

Austin, Texas
January 19, 2002


Item 9.   Disagreements on Accounting and Financial Disclosures

          None.

PART III

Item 10.  Directors and Executive Officers of Gateway

  Gateway has no directors or executive officers. Gateway's affairs are managed and controlled by the Managing General Partner. Certain information concerning the directors and officers of the Managing General Partner are set forth below.

Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc. - Managing General Partner

  Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc. is the Managing General Partner and is responsible for decisions pertaining to the acquisition and sale of Gateway's interests in the Project Partnerships and other matters related to the business operations of Gateway. The officers and directors of the Managing General Partner are as follows:

   Ronald M. Diner, age 58, is President and a Director. He is a Senior Vice President of Raymond James & Associates, Inc., with whom he has been employed since June 1983. Mr. Diner received an MBA degree from Columbia University (1968) and a BS degree from Trinity College (1966). Prior to joining Raymond James & Associates, Inc., he managed the broker-dealer activities of Pittway Real Estate, Inc., a real estate development firm. He was previously a loan officer at Marine Midland Realty Credit Corp., and spent three years with Common, Dann & Co., a New York regional investment firm. He has served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Council for Rural Housing and Development, a national organization of developers, managers and syndicators of properties developed under the RECD Section 515 program, and is a member of the Board of Directors of the Florida Council for Rural Housing and Development. Mr. Diner has been a speaker and panel member at state and national se minars relating to the low-income housing credit.

J. Davenport Mosby, age 46, is a Vice President and a Director. He is a Senior Vice President of Raymond James & Associates, Inc. which he joined in 1982. Mr. Mosby received an MBA from the Harvard Business School (1982). He graduated magna cum laude with a BA from Vanderbilt University where he was elected to Phi Beta Kappa.

Sandra L. Furey, age 40, is Secretary, Treasurer. Ms. Furey has been employed by Raymond James & Associates, Inc. since 1980 and currently serves as Closing Administrator for the Gateway Tax Credit Funds.

Raymond James Partners, Inc. -

   Raymond James Partners, Inc. has been formed to act as the general partner, with affiliated corporations, in limited partnerships sponsored by Raymond James Financial, Inc. Raymond James Partners, Inc. is a general partner for purposes of assuring that Gateway and other partnerships sponsored by affiliates have sufficient net worth to meet the minimum net worth requirements of state securities administrators.

  Information regarding the officers and directors of Raymond James Partners, Inc. is included on pages 58 and 59 of the Prospectus under the section captioned "Management" (consisting of pages 56 through 59 of the Prospectus) which is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 11. Executive Compensation

  Gateway has no directors or officers.


Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

  Neither of the General Partners nor their directors and officers own any units of the outstanding securities of Gateway as of March 31, 2002.

  Gateway is a Limited Partnership and therefore does not have voting shares of stock. To the knowledge of Gateway, no person owns of record or beneficially, more than 5% of Gateway's outstanding units.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

  Gateway has no officers or directors. However, various kinds of compensation and fees are payable to the General Partners and their affiliates during the organization and operations of Gateway. Additionally, the General Partners will receive distributions from Gateway if there is cash available for distribution or residual proceeds as defined in the Partnership Agreement. The amounts and kinds of compensation and fees are described on pages 15 to 18 of the Prospectus under the caption "Management Compensation", which is incorporated herein by reference.

  The Payable to General Partners primarily represents the asset management fees owed to the General Partners at the end of the period. It is unsecured, due on demand and, in accordance with the limited partnership agreement, non-interest bearing. Within the next 12 months, the Managing General Partner does not intend to demand payment on the portion of Asset Management Fees payable classified as long-term on the Balance Sheet.

  The Payable to Project Partnerships represents unpaid capital contributions to the Project Partnerships and will be paid after certain performance criteria are met. Such contributions are in turn payable to the general partner of the Project Partnerships.

  For the years ended March 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 the General Partners and affiliates are entitled to compensation and reimbursement for costs and expenses incurred by Gateway as follows:


  Asset Management Fee - The Managing General Partner is entitled to be paid an annual asset management fee equal to 0.25% of the aggregate cost of Gateway's interest in the projects owned by the Project Partnerships. The asset management fee will be paid only after all other expenses of Gateway have been paid. These fees are included in the Statements of Operations.


2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

Series 2

$   68,197

$   68,361

$   68,511

Series 3

62,892

63,104

63,301

Series 4

77,474

77,661

77,832

Series 5

95,755

96,008

96,241

Series 6

105,753
- -----------

106,125
- -----------

106,486
- -----------

Total

$  410,071
===========

$  411,259
===========

$  412,371
===========

       

  General and Administrative Expenses - The Managing General Partner is reimbursed for general and administrative expenses of Gateway on an accountable basis. This expense is included in the Statements of Operations.

 

2002
- ----

2001
- ----

2000
- ----

Series 2

$  11,737

$   9,149

$   8,181

Series 3

12,271

9,565

8,552

Series 4

15,471

12,060

10,779

Series 5

19,205

14,972

13,386

Series 6

20,272
- ---------

15,803
- ---------

14,130
- ---------

 

$  78,956

$  61,549

$  55,028

Total

=========

=========

=========


PART IV

Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K

a.(1) Financial Statements

  (2) Financial Statement Schedules -

  Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation of Property Owned by Project Partnerships

  All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or not required, or because the required information is shown either in the financial statements or in the notes thereto.

  (3) Exhibit Index -
  The following are included with Form S-11, Registration No. 33-31821 and amendments and supplements thereto previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Table
Number

                    1.1 Form of Dealer Manager Agreement, including Soliciting Dealer                     Agreement

                    1.2 Escrow Agreement between Gateway Tax Credit Fund II Ltd. and                     Southeast Bank, NA

                    3.1 The form of Partnership Agreement of the Partnership is
                    included as Exhibit "A" to the Prospectus

                    3.1.1 Certificate of Limited Partnership of Gateway Tax Credit
                    Fund II Ltd.

                    3.1.2 Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership of Gateway
                    Tax Credit Fund II Ltd.

3.2 Articles of Incorporation of Raymond James Partners, Inc.

3.2.1 Bylaws of Raymond James Partners, Inc.

3.3 Articles of Incorporation of Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.

3.3.1 Bylaws of Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.

3.4 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Nowata Properties, An Oklahoma Limited Partnership

3.5 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Poteau Properties II, An Oklahoma Limited Partnership

3.6 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Sallisaw Properties, An Oklahoma Limited Partnership

3.7 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Waldron Properties, An Arkansas Limited Partnership

3.8 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Roland Properties II, An Oklahoma Limited Partnership

3.9 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Stilwell Properties, An Oklahoma Limited Partnership

3.10 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Birchwood Apartments Limited Partnership

3.11 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Sunchase II, Ltd.

3.12 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Hornellsville Apartments

3.13 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of CE McKinley II Limited Partnership

3.14 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Hartwell Family, Ltd., L.P.

3.15 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Deerfield II Ltd., L.P.

3.16 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Claxton Elderly, Ltd., L.P.

3.17 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Inverness Club, Ltd., L.P.

3.18 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Lake Park Ltd., L.P.

3.19 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Lakeland Elderly Apartments, Ltd., L.P.

3.20 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Mt. Vernon Elderly Housing, Ltd., L.P.

3.21 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Pearson Elderly Housing, Ltd., L.P.

3.22 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Woodland Terrace Apartments, Ltd., L.P.

3.23 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Richland Elderly Housing, Ltd., L.P.

3.24 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Lakeshore Apartments Limited Partnership

3.25 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Lewiston Limited Partnership

3.26 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Springwood Apartments Limited Partnership

3.27 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Cherrytree Apartments Limited Partnership

3.28 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Charleston Properties, An Arkansas Limited Partnership

3.29 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Sallisaw Properties II, An Oklahoma Limited Partnership

3.30 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Pocola Properties, An Oklahoma Limited Partnership

3.31 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Prairie Apartments Limited Partnership

3.32 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Manchester Housing, Ltd., L.P.

3.33 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Sylacauga Heritage Apartments, Ltd.

3.34 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Durango C.W.W. Limited Partnership

3.35 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Alsace Village Limited Partnership

3.36 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Seneca Apartments, L.P.

3.37 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Westville Properties, a Limited Partnership

3.38 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Stilwell Properties II, Limited Partnership

3.39 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Wellsville Senior Housing, L.P.

3.40 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Spring Hill Senior Housing, L.P.

3.41 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Eudora Senior Housing, L.P.

3.42 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smithfield Greenbriar Limited Partnership

3.43 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Tarpon Heights Apartments, A Louisiana Partnership in Commendam

3.44 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Oaks Apartments, A Louisiana Partnership in Commendam

3.45 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Countrywood Apartments, Limited

3.46 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Weston Apartments

3.47 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Wildwood Apartments, Limited

3.48 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Hopkins Properties, Limited

3.49 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Hancock Properties, Limited

3.50 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Southwood, L.P.

3.51 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Belmont Senior Apts., Ltd.

3.52 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Elkhart Apts., Ltd.

3.53 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Bryan Senior Village Limited Partnership

3.54 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Brubaker Square Limited Partnership

3.55 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Villa Allegra Limited Partnership

3.56 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Heritage Villas, L.P.

3.57 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Logansport Seniors Apts., a Louisiana Partnership Commendam

3.58 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Wynnwood Common Associates

3.59 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Piedmont Development Company of Lamar County, Ltd., (L.P.)

3.60 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Sonora Seniors Apts., Ltd.

3.61 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Fredericksburg Seniors, Ltd.

3.62 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Ozona Seniors, Ltd.

3.63 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Brackettville Seniors, Ltd.

3.64 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Timpson Seniors Apartments, Ltd.

3.65 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Chestnut Apartments Limited Partnership

3.66 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Jasper Villas Apartments Limited Partnership

3.67 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Norton Green Limited Partnership

3.68 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Jonesville Manor Limited Partnership

3.69 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Edmonton Senior, Ltd.

3.70 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Owingsville Senior, Ltd.

3.71 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Courtyard, Ltd.

3.72 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Rural Development Group

3.73 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Williston Properties, A Limited Partnership

3.74 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of St. George Properties, A Limited Partnership

3.75 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Village Apartments of St. Joseph II Limited Partnership

3.76 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Village Apartments of Effingham Limited Partnership

3.77 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Village Apartments of Seymour II, L.P.

3.78 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Country Place Apartments - Portland II, Ltd.

3.79 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Country Place Apartments - Georgetown Limited Partnership

3.80 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of South Timber Ridge Apts., Ltd.

3.81 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Cloverdale RRH Assoc.

3.82 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Shannon Apartments Limited Partnership

3.83 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Spruce Apartments Limited Partnership

3.84 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Carthage Senior, L.P.

3.85 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Ehrhardt Place Limited Partnership

3.86 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Country Place Apartments - Coal City, Limited Partnership

5.1O Opinion regarding legality of Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn

5.1.1 Opinion regarding legality of Riden, Earle & Kiefner, PA

8.1 Tax opinion and consent of Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn

8.1.1 Tax opinion and consent of Riden, Earle & Kiefner, PA

24.1 The consent of Spence, Marston & Bunch

24.2 The consent of Spence, Marston, Bunch, Morris Co. appears on page II-7

24.3 The consent of Goddard, Henderson, Godbee & Nichols, PC with respect to the financial statements of Lake Park Apartments, Ltd.

24.4 The consent of Goddard, Henderson, Godbee & Nichols, PC with respect to the financial statements of Richland Elderly Housing, Ltd.

24.5 The consent of Goddard, Henderson, Godbee & Nichols, PC with respect to the financial statements of Pearson Elderly Housing, Ltd.

24.6 The consent of Goddard, Henderson, Godbee & Nichols, PC with respect to Mt. Vernon Elderly Housing, Ltd.

24.7 The consent of Goddard, Henderson, Godbee & Nichols, PC with respect to the financial statements of Woodland Terrace Apartments, Ltd.

24.8 The consent of Goddard, Henderson, Godbee & Nichols, PC with respect to the financial statements of Lakeland Elderly Housing, Ltd.

24.9 The consent of Grana & Teibel, PC with respect to Lewiston LP

24.10 The consent of Beall & Company with respect to Nowata Properties

24.11 The consent of Beall & Company with respect to Sallisaw Properties

24.12 The consent of Beall & Company with respect to Poteau Properties II

24.13 The consent of Beall & Company with respect to Charleston Properties

24.14 The consent of Beall & Company with respect to Roland Properties II

24.15 The consent of Beall & Company with respect to Stilwell Properties

24.16 The consent of Donald W. Causey, CPA, PC

24.17 The consent of Charles Bailly & Company, CPA

24.18 The consent of Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn to all references made to them in the Prospectus included as a part of the Registration Statement of Gateway Tax Credit Fund II Ltd., and all amendments thereto

24.18.1 The consent of Riden, Earle, & Kiefner, PA to all references made to them in the Prospectus included as a part of the Registration Statement of Gateway Tax Credit Fund II Ltd., and all amendments thereto is included in Exhibit 8.1.1.

28.1 Table VI (Acquisition of Properties by Program) of Appendix II to Industry Guide 5, Preparation of Registration Statements Relating to Interests in Real Estate Limited Partnerships

b. Reports filed on Form 8-K - NONE


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 2

Apartment Properties

Partnership
- -----------



Location
- --------



# of Units
- ----------


Mortgage
Loan Balance
- -------------

Claxton Elderly

Deerfield II

Hartwell Family

Cherrytree Apts.

Springwood Apts.

Lakeshore Apts.

Lewiston

Charleston

Sallisaw II

Pocola

Inverness Club

Pearson Elderly

Richland Elderly

Lake Park

Woodland Terrace

Mt. Vernon Elderly

Lakeland Elderly

Prairie Apartments

Sylacauga Heritage

Manchester Housing

Durango C.W.W.

Columbus Sr.

Claxton, GA

Douglas, GA

Hartwell, GA

Albion, PA

Westfield, NY

Tuskegee, AL

Lewiston, NY

Charleston, AR

Sallisaw, OK

Pocola, OK

Inverness, FL

Pearson, GA

Richland, GA

Lake Park, GA

Waynesboro, GA

Mt. Vernon, GA

Lakeland, GA

Eagle Butte, SD

Sylacauga, AL

Manchester, GA

Durango, CO

Columbus, KS

24

24

24

33

32

34

25

32

47

36

72

25

33

48

30

21

29

21

44

49

24

16

$654,836

698,317

701,746

1,193,657

1,246,373

1,048,424

994,851

838,904

1,191,103

982,353

2,972,269

625,595

863,115

1,478,242

883,129

571,164

776,790

971,154

1,378,671

1,449,516

1,029,067

434,660

     

------------

     

$22,983,936

     

============


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 2

Apartment Properties

Cost At Acquisition
- --------------------

 




Partnership
- -----------




Land
- ----


Buildings,
Improvements
and Equipment
- -------------

Net Improvements
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
- ----------------

Claxton Elderly

Deerfield II

Hartwell Family

Cherrytree Apts.

Springwood Apts.

Lakeshore Apts.

Lewiston

Charleston

Sallisaw II

Pocola

Inverness Club

Pearson Elderly

Richland Elderly

Lake Park

Woodland Terrace

Mt. Vernon Elderly

Lakeland Elderly

Prairie Apartments

Sylacauga Heritage

Manchester Housing

Durango C.W.W.

Columbus Sr.

$ 33,400

33,600

22,700

62,000

21,500

28,600

38,400

16,000

37,500

22,500

205,500

15,000

31,500

88,000

36,400

21,750

28,000

66,500

66,080

36,000

140,250

64,373

$ 766,138

820,962

836,998

1,376,297

1,451,283

1,238,749

1,178,185

1,060,098

1,480,089

1,223,370

3,111,565

767,590

1,027,512

1,710,725

1,047,107

680,437

930,574

1,150,214

1,648,081

1,746,076

1,123,454

444,257

$ 0

0

0

1,339

40,089

10,992

17,350

0

0

0

179,759

(1,130)

(1,141)

(4,183)

(3,816)

(1,252)

(2,759)

57,621

47,691

(775)

43,965

11,436

 

-----------

------------

------------

 

$1,115,553

$26,819,761

$395,186

 

===========

============

============


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 2

Apartment Properties

Gross Amount At Which Carried At December 31, 2001
- --------------------



Partnership
- -----------



Land
- ----

Buildings,
Improvements
and Equipment
- -------------



Total
- -----

Claxton Elderly

Deerfield II

Hartwell Family

Cherrytree Apts.

Springwood Apts.

Lakeshore Apts.

Lewiston

Charleston

Sallisaw II

Pocola

Inverness Club

Pearson Elderly

Richland Elderly

Lake Park

Woodland Terrace

Mt. Vernon Elderly

Lakeland Elderly

Prairie Apartments

Sylacauga Heritage

Manchester Housing

Durango C.W.W.

Columbus Sr.

$ 33,400

33,600

22,700

62,000

24,017

28,600

38,400

16,000

37,500

22,500

205,500

15,000

31,500

88,000

36,400

21,750

28,000

81,240

66,080

36,000

140,250

69,207

$ 766,138

820,962

836,998

1,377,636

1,488,855

1,249,741

1,195,535

1,060,098

1,480,089

1,223,370

3,291,324

766,460

1,026,371

1,706,542

1,043,291

679,185

927,815

1,193,095

1,695,772

1,745,301

1,167,419

450,859

$ 799,538

854,562

859,698

1,439,636

1,512,872

1,278,341

1,233,935

1,076,098

1,517,589

1,245,870

3,496,824

781,460

1,057,871

1,794,542

1,079,691

700,935

955,815

1,274,335

1,761,852

1,781,301

1,307,669

520,066

 

-----------

------------

------------

 

$1,137,644

$27,192,856

$28,330,500

 

===========

============

============


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 2

Apartment Properties

Partnership
- -----------



Accumulated Depreciation
- ------------------------



Depreciable Life
- ----------------

Claxton Elderly

Deerfield II

Hartwell Family

Cherrytree Apts.

Springwood Apts.

Lakeshore Apts.

Lewiston

Charleston

Sallisaw II

Pocola

Inverness Club

Pearson Elderly

Richland Elderly

Lake Park

Woodland Terrace

Mt. Vernon Elderly

Lakeland Elderly

Prairie Apartments

Sylacauga Heritage

Manchester Housing

Durango C.W.W.

Columbus Sr.

$ 320,807

344,621

353,767

403,122

459,762

382,388

337,147

501,703

681,411

516,715

1,300,659

297,053

392,152

687,751

403,019

263,492

356,047

401,579

527,579

659,664

346,629

215,653

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-40

5-40

5-40

5-25

5-25

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-30

5-30

5-30

5-30

5-30

5-30

5-40

5-40

5-30

5-40

5-27.5

 

-----------

 
 

$10,152,720

 
 

===========

 

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 3

Apartment Properties

Partnership
- -----------



Location
- --------



# of Units
- ----------


Mortgage
Loan Balance
- -------------

Poteau II

Sallisaw

Nowata Properties

Waldron Properties

Roland II

Stilwell

Birchwood Apts.

Hornellsville

Sunchase II

CE McKinley II

Weston Apartments

Countrywood Apts.

Wildwood Apts.

Hancock

Hopkins

Elkhart Apts.

Bryan Senior

Brubaker Square

Southwood

Villa Allegra

Belmont Senior

Heritage Villas

Logansport Seniors

Poteau, OK

Sallisaw, OK

Oolagah, OK

Waldron, AR

Roland, OK

Stilwell, OK

Pierre, SD

Arkport, NY

Watertown, SD

Rising Sun, MD

Weston, AL

Centreville, AL

Pineville, LA

Hawesville, KY

Madisonville, KY

Elkhart, TX

Bryan, OH

New Carlisle, OH

Savannah, TN

Celina, OH

Cynthiana, KY

Helena, GA

Logansport, LA

52

52

32

24

52

48

24

24

41

16

10

40

28

12

24

54

40

38

44

32

24

25

32

$ 1,295,495

1,306,175

853,217

636,736

1,304,922

1,187,075

784,861

890,362

1,186,391

605,878

273,170

1,193,596

845,422

362,196

741,343

1,131,898

1,071,335

1,111,052

1,480,686

893,399

759,179

674,855

893,674

     

------------

     

$21,482,917

     

============


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 3

Apartment Properties

Cost At Acquisition
- --------------------

 




Partnership
- -----------




Land
- ----


Buildings,
Improvements
and Equipment
- -------------

Net Improvements
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
- ----------------

Poteau II

Sallisaw

Nowata Properties

Waldron Properties

Roland II

Stilwell

Birchwood Apts.

Hornellsville

Sunchase II

CE McKinley II

Weston Apartments

Countrywood Apts.

Wildwood Apts.

Hancock

Hopkins

Elkhart Apts.

Bryan Senior

Brubaker Square

Southwood

Villa Allegra

Belmont Senior

Heritage Villas

Logansport Seniors

$ 76,827

70,000

45,500

26,000

70,000

37,500

116,740

41,225

113,115

11,762

0

55,750

48,000

20,700

43,581

35,985

74,000

75,000

15,000

35,000

43,600

21,840

27,621

$ 1,712,321

1,674,103

1,102,984

834,273

1,734,010

1,560,201

885,923

1,018,523

1,198,373

745,635

339,144

1,447,439

1,018,897

419,725

885,087

1,361,096

1,102,728

1,376,075

1,769,334

1,097,214

891,543

801,128

1,058,773

$ 0

0

0

0

0

0

70,312

62,846

66,428

69,486

805

61,693

19,823

0

(1,412)

201,319

11,564

7,941

16,677

18,408

0

1,791

23,599

 

-----------

------------

------------

 

$1,104,746

$26,034,529

$631,280

 

===========

============

============


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 3

Apartment Properties

Gross Amount At Which Carried At December 31, 2001
- --------------------



Partnership
- -----------



Land
- ----

Buildings,
Improvements
and Equipment
- -------------



Total
- -----

Poteau II

Sallisaw

Nowata Properties

Waldron Properties

Roland II

Stilwell

Birchwood Apts.

Hornellsville

Sunchase II

CE McKinley II

Weston Apartments

Countrywood Apts.

Wildwood Apts.

Hancock

Hopkins

Elkhart Apts.

Bryan Senior

Brubaker Square

Southwood

Villa Allegra

Belmont Senior

Heritage Villas

Logansport Seniors

$ 76,827

70,000

45,500

26,000

70,000

37,500

125,832

41,225

113,115

11,749

0

55,750

48,000

20,700

43,581

159,682

74,000

75,000

15,000

35,000

43,600

21,840

27,621

$ 1,712,321

1,674,103

1,102,984

834,273

1,734,010

1,560,201

947,143

1,081,369

1,264,801

815,134

339,949

1,509,132

1,038,720

419,725

883,675

1,438,718

1,114,292

1,384,016

1,786,011

1,115,622

891,543

802,919

1,082,372

$ 1,789,148

1,744,103

1,148,484

860,273

1,804,010

1,597,701

1,072,975

1,122,594

1,377,916

826,883

339,949

1,564,882

1,086,720

440,425

927,256

1,598,400

1,188,292

1,459,016

1,801,011

1,150,622

935,143

824,759

1,109,993

 

-----------

------------

------------

 

$1,237,522

$26,533,033

$27,770,555

 

===========

============

============


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 3


Partnership
- -----------


Accumulated Depreciation
- ------------------------


Depreciable Life
- ----------------

Poteau II

Sallisaw

Nowata Properties

Waldron Properties

Roland II

Stilwell

Birchwood Apts.

Hornellsville

Sunchase II

CE McKinley II

Weston Apartments

Countrywood Apts.

Wildwood Apts.

Hancock

Hopkins

Elkhart Apts.

Bryan Senior

Brubaker Square

Southwood

Villa Allegra

Belmont Senior

Heritage Villas

Logansport Seniors

$ 943,917

892,905

579,856

438,232

950,139

846,279

370,117

529,902

496,754

400,649

174,434

732,745

456,641

175,114

368,683

711,408

599,840

674,125

741,962

556,679

266,720

316,101

290,330

5-25

5-25

5-25

5-25

5-25

5-25

5-40

5-27.5

5-40

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-30

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-25

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-50

5-27.5

5-40

5-30

5-40

 

-----------

 
 

$12,513,532

 
 

===========

 

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 4

Apartment Properties

Partnership
- -----------



Location
- --------



# of Units
- ----------


Mortgage
Loan Balance
- -------------

Alsace Village

Seneca Apartments

Eudora Senior

Westville

Wellsville Senior

Stilwell II

Spring Hill Senior

Smithfield

Tarpon Heights

Oaks Apartments

Wynnwood Common

Chestnut Apartments

St. George

Williston

Brackettville Sr.

Sonora Seniors

Ozona Seniors

Fredericksburg Sr.

St. Joseph

Courtyard

Rural Development

Jasper Villas

Edmonton Senior

Jonesville Manor

Norton Green

Owingsville Senior

Timpson Seniors

Piedmont

S.F. Arkansas City

Soda Springs, ID

Seneca, MO

Eudora, KS

Westville, OK

Wellsville, KS

Stilwell, OK

Spring Hill, KS

Smithfield, UT

Galliano, LA

Oakdale, LA

Fairchance, PA

Howard, SD

St. George, SC

Williston, SC

Brackettville, TX

Sonora, TX

Ozona, TX

Fredericksburg,TX

St. Joseph, IL

Huron, SD

Ashland, ME

Jasper, AR

Edmonton, KY

Jonesville, VA

Norton, VA

Owingsville, KY

Timpson, TX

Barnesville, GA

Arkansas City, KS

24

24

36

36

24

52

24

40

48

32

34

24

24

24

32

32

24

48

24

21

25

25

24

40

40

22

28

36

12

$ 634,756

606,020

954,617

855,647

645,071

1,283,469

694,131

1,532,714

1,238,455

829,071

1,365,285

851,756

750,867

795,018

818,492

839,747

628,860

1,199,270

824,553

708,517

1,201,402

855,515

752,489

1,345,399

1,336,222

703,467

670,397

1,039,445

339,548

     

------------

     

$26,300,200

     

============


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 4

Apartment Properties

Cost At Acquisition
- --------------------

 




Partnership
- -----------




Land
- ----


Buildings,
Improvements
and Equipment
- -------------

Net Improvements
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
- ----------------

Alsace Village

Seneca Apartments

Eudora Senior

Westville

Wellsville Senior

Stilwell II

Spring Hill Senior

Smithfield

Tarpon Heights

Oaks Apartments

Wynnwood Common

Chestnut Apartments

St. George

Williston

Brackettville Sr.

Sonora Seniors

Ozona Seniors

Fredericksburg Sr.

St. Joseph

Courtyard

Rural Development

Jasper Villas

Edmonton Senior

Jonesville Manor

Norton Green

Owingsville Senior

Timpson Seniors

Piedmont

S.F. Arkansas City

$ 15,000

76,212

50,000

27,560

38,000

30,000

49,800

82,500

85,000

42,000

68,000

57,200

22,600

25,000

28,600

51,000

40,000

45,000

28,000

24,500

38,200

27,000

40,000

100,000

120,000

28,000

13,500

29,500

16,800

$ 771,590

640,702

1,207,482

1,074,126

772,971

1,627,974

986,569

1,698,213

1,408,434

989,522

1,578,814

977,493

915,400

959,345

963,366

962,315

719,843

1,357,563

940,580

810,110

1,361,892

1,067,890

866,714

1,578,135

1,535,373

820,044

802,416

1,259,547

395,228

$ 37,015

25,290

0

0

(1)

0

0

104,384

0

14,460

32,204

35,758

1,655

18,255

50,297

33,717

42,246

41,689

8,303

25,579

22,390

10,388

0

51,375

63,629

5,250

0

0

0

 

-----------

------------

------------

 

$1,298,972

$31,049,651

$623,883

 

===========

============

============


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 4

Apartment Properties

Gross Amount At Which Carried At December 31, 2001
- --------------------



Partnership
- -----------



Land
- ----

Buildings,
Improvements
and Equipment
- -------------



Total
- -----

Alsace Village

Seneca Apartments

Eudora Senior

Westville

Wellsville Senior

Stilwell II

Spring Hill Senior

Smithfield

Tarpon Heights

Oaks Apartments

Wynnwood Common

Chestnut Apartments

St. George

Williston

Brackettville Sr.

Sonora Seniors

Ozona Seniors

Fredericksburg Sr.

St. Joseph

Courtyard

Rural Development

Jasper Villas

Edmonton Senior

Jonesville Manor

Norton Green

Owingsville Senior

Timpson Seniors

Piedmont

S.F. Arkansas City

$ 15,000

77,237

50,000

27,560

38,000

30,000

49,800

112,284

85,000

42,000

81,233

63,800

22,600

25,000

28,600

51,000

40,000

45,000

28,000

27,055

38,200

27,000

40,000

100,000

120,000

28,000

13,500

29,500

16,800

$ 808,605

664,967

1,207,482

1,074,126

772,970

1,627,974

986,569

1,772,813

1,408,434

1,003,982

1,597,785

1,006,651

917,055

977,600

1,013,663

996,032

762,089

1,399,252

948,883

833,134

1,384,282

1,078,278

866,714

1,629,510

1,599,002

825,294

802,416

1,259,547

395,228

$ 823,605

742,204

1,257,482

1,101,686

810,970

1,657,974

1,036,369

1,885,097

1,493,434

1,045,982

1,679,018

1,070,451

939,655

1,002,600

1,042,263

1,047,032

802,089

1,444,252

976,883

860,189

1,422,482

1,105,278

906,714

1,729,510

1,719,002

853,294

815,916

1,289,047

412,028

 

-----------

------------

------------

 

$1,352,169

$31,620,337

$32,972,506

 

===========

============

============


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 4

Apartment Properties

Partnership
- -----------



Accumulated Depreciation
- ------------------------



Depreciable Life
- ----------------

Alsace Village

Seneca Apartments

Eudora Senior

Westville

Wellsville Senior

Stilwell II

Spring Hill Senior

Smithfield

Tarpon Heights

Oaks Apartments

Wynnwood Common

Chestnut Apartments

St. George

Williston

Brackettville Sr.

Sonora Seniors

Ozona Seniors

Fredericksburg Sr.

St. Joseph

Courtyard

Rural Development

Jasper Villas

Edmonton Senior

Jonesville Manor

Norton Green

Owingsville Senior

Timpson Seniors

Piedmont

S.F. Arkansas City

$ 348,961

348,555

499,867

451,812

329,653

685,567

459,252

488,891

387,926

275,341

475,017

346,188

411,589

422,205

251,239

262,812

191,235

365,324

394,520

323,899

602,327

322,046

254,693

678,537

692,846

238,326

237,897

365,804

164,956

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-25

5-27.5

5-25

5-40

5-40

5-40

5-40

5-40

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-40

5-40

5-40

5-40

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-40

5-40

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-40

5-40

5-27.5

5-27.5

 

-----------

 
 

$11,277,285

 
 

===========

 

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 5

Apartment Properties

Partnership
- -----------



Location
- --------



# of Units
- ----------


Mortgage
Loan Balance
- -------------

Seymour

Effingham

S.F. Winfield

S.F.Medicine Lodge

S.F. Ottawa

S.F. Concordia

Highland View

Carrollton Club

Scarlett Oaks

Brooks Hill

Greensboro

Greensboro II

Pine Terrace

Shellman

Blackshear

Crisp Properties

Crawford

Yorkshire

Woodcrest

Fox Ridge

Redmont II

Clayton

Alma

Pemberton Village

Magic Circle

Spring Hill

Menard Retirement

Wallis Housing

Zapata Housing

Mill Creek

Portland II

Georgetown

Cloverdale

S. Timber Ridge

Pineville

Ravenwood

Seymour, IN

Effingham, IL

Winfield, KS

Medicine Lodge,KS

Ottawa, KS

Concordia, KS

Elgin, OR

Carrollton, GA

Lexington, SC

Ellijay, GA

Greensboro, GA

Greensboro, GA

Wrightsville, GA

Shellman, GA

Cordele, GA

Cordele, GA

Crawford, GA

Wagoner, OK

South Boston, VA

Russellville, AL

Red Bay, AL

Clayton, OK

Alma, AR

Hiawatha, KS

Eureka, KS

Spring Hill, KS

Menard, TX

Wallis, TX

Zapata, TX

Grove, OK

Portland, IN

Georgetown, OH

Chandler, TX

Cloverdale, IN

Pineville, MO

Americus, GA

37

24

12

16

24

20

24

78

40

44

24

33

25

27

46

31

25

60

40

24

24

24

24

24

24

36

24

24

40

60

20

24

24

44

12

24

$ 1,234,652

800,619

330,924

452,074

569,320

553,238

711,699

2,670,795

1,383,559

1,455,720

729,909

900,078

724,063

736,252

1,314,581

928,081

741,887

2,076,101

1,282,240

733,403

692,394

666,293

730,604

635,530

651,430

1,123,006

625,689

426,623

975,606

1,428,298

580,870

738,200

755,273

1,060,244

318,736

724,266

     

------------

     

$32,462,257

     

============


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 5

Apartment Properties

Cost At Acquisition
- -------------------

 




Partnership
- -----------




Land
- ----


Buildings,
Improvements
and Equipment
- -------------

Net Improvements
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
- ----------------

Seymour

Effingham

S.F. Winfield

S.F.Medicine Lodge

S.F. Ottawa

S.F. Concordia

Highland View

Carrollton Club

Scarlett Oaks

Brooks Hill

Greensboro

Greensboro II

Pine Terrace

Shellman

Blackshear

Crisp Properties

Crawford

Yorkshire

Woodcrest

Fox Ridge

Redmont II

Clayton

Alma

Pemberton Village

Magic Circle

Spring Hill

Menard Retirement

Wallis Housing

Zapata Housing

Mill Creek

Portland II

Georgetown

Cloverdale

S. Timber Ridge

Pineville

Ravenwood

$ 59,500

38,500

18,000

21,600

25,200

28,000

16,220

248,067

44,475

0

15,930

21,330

14,700

13,500

60,000

48,000

16,600

100,000

70,000

39,781

25,000

35,600

45,000

12,020

22,660

70,868

21,000

13,900

44,000

28,000

43,102

0

40,000

43,705

59,661

14,300

$ 1,452,557

940,327

382,920

542,959

687,929

658,961

830,471

722,560

992,158

214,335

61,495

92,063

196,071

512,531

413,143

578,709

187,812

2,212,045

842,335

848,996

814,432

835,930

912,710

767,228

749,504

1,318,926

721,251

553,230

1,120,538

414,429

410,683

149,483

583,115

1,233,570

328,468

873,596

$ 5,645

1,790

1,482

0

19,213

5,465

46,463

2,247,274

640,730

1,538,839

788,834

975,271

674,415

375,617

1,129,006

500,362

703,300

262,253

662,441

1,164

1,164

0

0

(2,523)

51,479

59,584

18,601

11,203

73,867

1,299,240

326,652

810,482

339,800

31,601

21,298

13,100

 

-----------

------------

------------

 

$1,418,219

$25,157,470

$13,635,112

 

===========

============

============


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 5

Apartment Properties

Gross Amount At Which Carried At December 31, 2001
- --------------------



Partnership
- -----------



Land
- ----

Buildings,
Improvements
and Equipment
- -------------



Total
- -----

Seymour

Effingham

S.F. Winfield

S.F.Medicine Lodge

S.F. Ottawa

S.F. Concordia

Highland View

Carrollton Club

Scarlett Oaks

Brooks Hill

Greensboro

Greensboro II

Pine Terrace

Shellman

Blackshear

Crisp Properties

Crawford

Yorkshire

Woodcrest

Fox Ridge

Redmont II

Clayton

Alma

Pemberton Village

Magic Circle

Spring Hill

Menard Retirement

Wallis Housing

Zapata Housing

Mill Creek

Portland II

Georgetown

Cloverdale

S. Timber Ridge

Pineville

Ravenwood

$ 59,500

38,500

18,000

21,600

25,200

28,000

16,220

248,068

44,475

77,500

15,930

16,845

14,700

13,500

60,000

48,000

16,600

100,788

70,000

39,781

25,000

35,600

45,000

12,020

22,660

70,868

21,000

13,900

46,323

28,000

15,000

50,393

40,000

50,123

66,221

14,300

$ 1,458,202

942,117

384,402

542,959

707,142

664,426

876,934

2,969,833

1,632,888

1,675,674

850,329

1,071,819

870,486

888,148

1,542,149

1,079,071

891,112

2,473,510

1,504,776

850,160

815,596

835,930

912,710

764,705

800,983

1,378,510

739,852

564,433

1,192,082

1,713,669

765,437

909,572

922,915

1,258,753

343,206

886,696

$ 1,517,702

980,617

402,402

564,559

732,342

692,426

893,154

3,217,901

1,677,363

1,753,174

866,259

1,088,664

885,186

901,648

1,602,149

1,127,071

907,712

2,574,298

1,574,776

889,941

840,596

871,530

957,710

776,725

823,643

1,449,378

760,852

578,333

1,238,405

1,741,669

780,437

959,965

962,915

1,308,876

409,427

900,996

 

-----------

------------

------------

 

$1,529,615

$38,681,186

$40,210,801

 

===========

============

============


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 5


Partnership
- -----------


Accumulated Depreciation
- ------------------------


Depreciable Life
- ----------------

Seymour

Effingham

S.F. Winfield

S.F.Medicine Lodge

S.F. Ottawa

S.F. Concordia

Highland View

Carrollton Club

Scarlett Oaks

Brooks Hill

Greensboro

Greensboro II

Pine Terrace

Shellman

Blackshear

Crisp Properties

Crawford

Yorkshire

Woodcrest

Fox Ridge

Redmont II

Clayton

Alma

Pemberton Village

Magic Circle

Spring Hill

Menard Retirement

Wallis Housing

Zapata Housing

Mill Creek

Portland II

Georgetown

Cloverdale

S. Timber Ridge

Pineville

Ravenwood

$ 590,447

376,111

161,581

206,004

289,984

276,988

249,803

1,043,454

579,058

565,671

281,273

354,358

296,288

316,372

520,470

377,325

307,813

572,976

432,409

214,512

209,018

331,054

396,822

304,745

309,422

574,973

158,624

206,472

325,730

719,567

238,557

270,563

385,177

539,860

168,150

185,018

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-40

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-30

5-30

5-30

5-30

5-30

5-30

5-30

5-50

5-40

5-50

5-50

5-27.5

5-25

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-25

5-30

5-30

5-27.5

5-25

5-27.5

5-50

5-27.5

5-25

5-27.5

5-27.5

 

-----------

 
 

$13,336,649

 
 

===========

 

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 6

Apartment Properties

Partnership
- -----------



Location
- --------



# of Units
- ----------


Mortgage
Loan Balance
- -------------

Spruce

Shannon Apartments

Carthage

Mt. Crest

Coal City

Blacksburg Terrace

Frazier

Ehrhardt

Sinton

Frankston

Flagler Beach

Oak Ridge

Monett

Arma

Southwest City

Meadowcrest

Parsons

Newport Village

Goodwater Falls

Northfield Station

Pleasant Hill Square

Winter Park

Cornell

Heritage Drive S.

Brodhead

Mt. Vilage

Hazelhurst

Sunrise

Stony Creek

Logan Place

Haines

Maple Wood

Summerhill

Dorchester

Lancaster

Autumn Village

Hardy

Dawson

Pierre, SD

O'Neill, NE

Carthage, MO

Enterprise, OR

Coal City, IL

Blacksburg, SC

Smyrna, DE

Ehrhardt, SC

Sinton, TX

Frankston, TX

Flagler Beach, FL

Williamsburg, KY

Monett, MO

Arma, KS

Southwest City, MO

Luverne, AL

Parsons, KS

Newport, TN

Jenkins, KY

Corbin, KY

Somerset, KY

Mitchell, SD

Watertown, SD

Jacksonville, TX

Brodhead, KY

Mt. Vernon, KY

Hazlehurst, MS

Yankton, SD

Hooversville, PA

Logan, OH

Haines, AK

Barbourville, KY

Gassville, AR

St. George, SC

Mountain View, AR

Harrison, AR

Hardy, AR

Dawson, GA

24

16

24

39

24

32

30

16

32

24

43

24

32

28

12

32

48

40

36

24

24

24

24

40

24

24

32

33

32

40

32

24

28

12

33

16

24

40

$ 911,469

533,586

572,166

1,000,449

975,412

1,082,402

1,468,438

560,494

848,799

558,682

1,380,295

810,686

785,602

716,110

317,948

1,003,983

1,257,415

1,299,289

1,121,045

797,671

786,989

999,849

868,312

979,881

786,015

782,289

971,818

1,157,765

1,340,925

1,250,428

2,379,540

795,658

795,005

462,964

1,110,058

210,049

326,333

1,185,181

     

------------

     

$35,191,000

     

============


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 6

Apartment Properties

Cost At Acquisition
- --------------------

 




Partnership
- -----------




Land
- ----


Buildings,
Improvements
and Equipment
- -------------

Net Improvements
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
- ----------------

Spruce

Shannon Apartments

Carthage

Mt. Crest

Coal City

Blacksburg Terrace

Frazier

Ehrhardt

Sinton

Frankston

Flagler Beach

Oak Ridge

Monett

Arma

Southwest City

Meadowcrest

Parsons

Newport Village

Goodwater Falls

Northfield Station

Pleasant Hill Square

Winter Park

Cornell

Heritage Drive S.

Brodhead

Mt. Vilage

Hazelhurst

Sunrise

Stony Creek

Logan Place

Haines

Maple Wood

Summerhill

Dorchester

Lancaster

Autumn Village

Hardy

Dawson

$ 60,040

5,000

115,814

64,914

60,055

39,930

51,665

9,020

42,103

30,000

118,575

40,000

170,229

85,512

67,303

72,500

49,780

61,350

32,000

44,250

35,000

95,000

32,000

44,247

21,600

55,000

60,000

90,000

0

39,300

189,323

79,000

23,000

13,000

37,500

20,000

0

40,000

$ 108,772

94,494

578,597

1,143,675

1,121,477

1,278,860

1,619,209

671,750

985,010

639,068

1,534,541

995,782

782,795

771,316

319,272

1,130,651

1,483,188

1,470,505

1,142,517

977,220

893,323

1,121,119

1,017,572

1,151,157

932,468

884,596

1,118,734

1,269,252

1,428,656

1,477,527

2,851,953

924,144

788,157

239,455

1,361,272

595,604

473,695

346,569

$ 967,879

575,757

36,722

35,936

77,293

38,276

5,968

5,006

25,946

5,913

0

2,184

17,333

24,312

21,262

2,982

0

88,098

225,121

1,091

39,053

57,416

42,896

19,610

8,725

4,304

14,923

60,908

220,627

10,085

(3,347)

22,345

33,083

309,817

(14,886)

0

462,820

1,088,404

 

-----------

------------

------------

 

$2,094,010

$37,723,952

$4,533,862

 

===========

============

============


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 6

Apartment Properties

Gross Amount At Which Carried At December 31, 2001



Partnership
- -----------



Land
- ----

Buildings,
Improvements
and Equipment
- -------------



Total
- -----

Spruce

Shannon Apartments

Carthage

Mt. Crest

Coal City

Blacksburg Terrace

Frazier

Ehrhardt

Sinton

Frankston

Flagler Beach

Oak Ridge

Monett

Arma

Southwest City

Meadowcrest

Parsons

Newport Village

Goodwater Falls

Northfield Station

Pleasant Hill Square

Winter Park

Cornell

Heritage Drive S.

Brodhead

Mt. Vilage

Hazelhurst

Sunrise

Stony Creek

Logan Place

Haines

Maple Wood

Summerhill

Dorchester

Lancaster

Autumn Village

Hardy

Dawson

$ 86,308

18,406

115,814

64,914

60,055

39,930

51,665

9,020

42,103

30,000

118,575

40,000

173,213

89,512

79,336

72,500

49,780

61,350

32,000

44,250

35,000

95,000

35,592

53,837

21,600

55,000

60,000

112,363

104,800

39,300

189,323

79,000

23,000

13,000

37,500

20,000

21,250

40,000

$ 1,050,383

656,845

615,319

1,179,611

1,198,770

1,317,136

1,625,177

676,756

1,010,956

644,981

1,534,541

997,966

797,144

791,628

328,501

1,133,633

1,483,188

1,558,603

1,367,638

978,311

932,376

1,178,535

1,056,876

1,161,177

941,193

888,900

1,133,657

1,307,797

1,544,483

1,487,612

2,848,606

946,489

821,240

549,272

1,346,386

595,604

915,265

1,434,973

$ 1,136,691

675,251

731,133

1,244,525

1,258,825

1,357,066

1,676,842

685,776

1,053,059

674,981

1,653,116

1,037,966

970,357

881,140

407,837

1,206,133

1,532,968

1,619,953

1,399,638

1,022,561

967,376

1,273,535

1,092,468

1,215,014

962,793

943,900

1,193,657

1,420,160

1,649,283

1,526,912

3,037,929

1,025,489

844,240

562,272

1,383,886

615,604

936,515

1,474,973

 

-----------

------------

------------

 

$2,314,296

$42,037,528

$44,351,824

 

===========

============

============


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 6


Partnership
- -----------


Accumulated Depreciation
- ------------------------


Depreciable Life
- ----------------

Spruce

Shannon Apartments

Carthage

Mt. Crest

Coal City

Blacksburg Terrace

Frazier

Ehrhardt

Sinton

Frankston

Flagler Beach

Oak Ridge

Monett

Arma

Southwest City

Meadowcrest

Parsons

Newport Village

Goodwater Falls

Northfield Station

Pleasant Hill Square

Winter Park

Cornell

Heritage Drive S.

Brodhead

Mt. Vilage

Hazelhurst

Sunrise

Stony Creek

Logan Place

Haines

Maple Wood

Summerhill

Dorchester

Lancaster

Autumn Village

Hardy

Dawson

$ 351,064

169,647

327,853

474,938

312,047

527,849

647,606

242,986

212,463

136,064

416,742

366,701

398,179

380,523

167,252

320,699

588,471

593,970

358,552

260,046

246,700

380,436

278,305

473,355

238,262

229,135

291,971

455,834

401,939

460,241

1,021,086

339,089

304,740

187,926

363,978

155,633

229,189

292,257

5-30

5-40

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-50

5-30

5-40

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-40

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-40

5-40

5-25

5-40

5-50

5-40

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-27.5

5-40

5-40

5-40

5-40

 

-----------

 
 

$13,603,728

 
 

===========

 

SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
NOTES TO SCHEDULE III

Reconciliation of Land, Building & Improvements current year changes:
SERIES 2

Balance at beginning of period -
December 31, 2000
 Additions during period:
  Acquisitions through foreclosure
  Other acquisitions
  Improvements, etc.
  Other


 Deductions during period:
  Cost of real estate sold
  Other





37,474 


- ---------




- ---------


$28,293,026 






37,474 





- ---------

Balance at end of period -
December 31, 2001

 


$28,330,500 
============

Reconciliation of Accumulated Depreciation current year changes:


Balance at beginning of period -
December 31, 2000
  Current year expense
  Less Accumulated Depreciation of real   estate sold
  Other




865,003 



- ---------



$ 9,287,713 





865,007 
- ----------

Balance at end of period -
December 31, 2001

 


$ 10,152,720 
===========


SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
NOTES TO SCHEDULE III

Reconciliation of Land, Building & Improvements current year changes:
SERIES 3

Balance at beginning of period -
December 31, 2000
 Additions during period:
  Acquisitions through foreclosure
  Other acquisitions
  Improvements, etc.
  Other


 Deductions during period:
  Cost of real estate sold
  Other





154,310 


- ---------


4,358 

- ---------


$27,620,603 






154,310 




(4,358)
- ---------

Balance at end of period -
December 31, 2001

 


$27,770,555 
===========

Reconciliation of Accumulated Depreciation current year changes:


Balance at beginning of period -
December 31, 2000
  Current year expense
  Less Accumulated Depreciation of real   estate sold
  Other




937,911 

(4,358)

- --------


$11,579,979 






933,553 
- ----------

Balance at end of period -
December 31, 2001

 


$12,513,532 
============


SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
NOTES TO SCHEDULE III

Reconciliation of Land, Building & Improvements current year changes:
SERIES 4

Balance at beginning of period -
December 31, 2000
 Additions during period:
  Acquisitions through foreclosure
  Other acquisitions
  Improvements, etc.
  Other


 Deductions during period:
  Cost of real estate sold
  Other





248,605 


- ---------


195 

- ---------


$32,724,096 






248,605 




(195)
- ---------

Balance at end of period -
December 31, 2001

 


$32,972,506 
=============

Reconciliation of Accumulated Depreciation current year changes:


Balance at beginning of period -
December 31, 2000
  Current year expense
  Less Accumulated Depreciation of real   estate sold
  Other




979,486 

(195)

- ---------



$ 10,297,994 





979,291 

- ----------

Balance at end of period -
December 31, 2001

 


$11,277,285 
===========


SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
NOTES TO SCHEDULE III

Reconciliation of Land, Building & Improvements current year changes:
SERIES 5

Balance at beginning of period -
December 31, 2000
 Additions during period:
  Acquisitions through foreclosure
  Other acquisitions
  Improvements, etc.
  Other


 Deductions during period:
  Cost of real estate sold
  Other





68,935 


- ---------


6,791 

- ---------


$40,148,657 






68,935 




(6,791) 
- ---------

Balance at end of period -
December 31, 2001

 


$40,210,801 
============

Reconciliation of Accumulated Depreciation current year changes:

Balance at beginning of period -
December 31, 2000
  Current year expense
  Less Accumulated Depreciation of real   estate sold
  Other



1,294,116 

(6,791) 

- --------

$12,049,324 





1,287,325 
- ----------

Balance at end of period -
December 31, 2001

 


$13,336,649 
============


SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
NOTES TO SCHEDULE III

Reconciliation of Land, Building & Improvements current year changes:
SERIES 6

Balance at beginning of period -
December 31, 2000
 Additions during period:
  Acquisitions through foreclosure
  Other acquisitions
  Improvements, etc.
  Other


 Deductions during period:
  Cost of real estate sold
  Other
















129,189 


- ---------


2,218 

- ---------













$44,224,853 






129,189 



(2,218)
- ----------

Balance at end of period -
December 31, 2001

 


$44,351,824 
============

Reconciliation of Accumulated Depreciation current year changes:

Balance at beginning of period -
December 31, 2000

  Current year expense
  Less Accumulated Depreciation of real   estate sold
  Other




1,347,627 

(2,218)

- ----------


$12,258,319 






1,345,409 
- ----------

Balance at end of period -
December 31, 2001

 


$13,603,728 
============


GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE IV - MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 2



PARTNERSHIP
- -----------


# OF
UNITS
- ------



BALANCE
- -------


INTEREST
RATE 
- --------

MONTHLY
DEBT 
SERVICE
- --------


TERM
(YEARS)
- ------

Claxton Elderly

Deerfield II

Hartwell Family

Cherrytree Apts.

Springwood Apts.

Lakeshore Apts.

Lewiston

Charleston

Sallisaw II

Pocola

Inverness Club

Pearson Elderly

Richland Elderly

Lake Park

Woodland Terrace

Mt. Vernon Elderly

Lakeland Elderly

Prairie Apartments

Sylacauga Heritage

Manchester Housing

Durango C.W.W.

Columbus Sr.

24

24

24

33

32

34

25

32

47

36

72

25

33

48

30

21

29

21

44

49

24

16

654,836

698,317

701,746

1,193,657

1,246,373

1,048,424

994,851

838,904

1,191,103

982,353

2,972,269

625,595

863,115

1,478,242

883,129

571,164

776,790

971,154

1,378,671

1,449,516

1,029,067

434,660

-----------

8.75%

8.75%

8.75%

8.75%

8.75%

8.75%

9.00%

8.75%

8.75%

8.75%

8.75%

9.00%

8.75%

9.00%

8.75%

8.75%

8.75%

9.00%

8.75%

8.75%

9.00%

8.25%

5,883

6,284

5,307

9,011

9,218

7,905

7,720

6,333

8,980

7,407

27,905

4,926

6,517

11,466

6,666

4,309

5,882

7,515

10,536

10,958

7,739

3,102

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

   

$22,983,936

===========

     

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE IV - MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 3



PARTNERSHIP
- -----------


# OF
UNITS
- ------



BALANCE
- --------


INTEREST
RATE 
- -------

MONTHLY
DEBT 
SERVICE
- -------


TERM 
(YEARS)
- ------

Poteau II

Sallisaw

Nowata Properties

Waldron Properties

Roland II

Stilwell

Birchwood Apts.

Hornellsville

Sunchase II

CE McKinley II

Weston Apartments

Countrywood Apts.

Wildwood Apts.

Hancock

Hopkins

Elkhart Apts.

Bryan Senior

Brubaker Square

Southwood

Villa Allegra

Belmont Senior

Heritage Villas

Logansport Seniors

52

52

32

24

52

48

24

24

41

16

10

40

28

12

24

54

40

38

44

32

24

25

32

1,295,495

1,306,175

853,217

636,736

1,304,922

1,187,075

784,861

890,362

1,186,391

605,878

273,170

1,193,596

845,422

362,196

741,343

1,131,898

1,071,335

1,111,052

1,480,686

893,399

759,179

674,855

893,674

-----------

9.50%

9.50%

9.50%

9.00%

9.50%

9.50%

9.50%

9.00%

9.00%

8.75%

9.00%

9.00%

9.50%

9.50%

8.75%

9.00%

10.00%

9.00%

9.25%

9.00%

9.00%

8.75%

8.75%

10,682

10,654

6,905

4,950

10,657

9,727

6,410

6,927

9,279

5,146

2,131

9,310

6,906

3,119

5,815

9,198

9,455

8,646

11,752

7,053

6,001

5,110

6,745

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

40

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

   

$21,482,917

===========

     

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE IV - MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 4



PARTNERSHIP
- -----------


# OF
UNITS
- -----



BALANCE
- -------


INTEREST
RATE  
- -------

MONTHLY
DEBT 
SERVICE
- -------


TERM 
(YEARS)
- ------

Alsace Village

Seneca Apartments

Eudora Senior

Westville

Wellsville Senior

Stilwell II

Spring Hill Senior

Smithfield

Tarpon Heights

Oaks Apartments

Wynnwood Common

Chestnut Apartments

St. George

Williston

Brackettville Sr.

Sonora Seniors

Ozona Seniors

Fredericksburg Sr.

St. Joseph

Courtyard

Rural Development

Jasper Villas

Edmonton Senior

Jonesville Manor

Norton Green

Owingsville Senior

Timpson Seniors

Piedmont

S.F. Arkansas City

24

24

36

36

24

52

24

40

48

32

34

24

24

24

32

32

24

48

24

21

25

25

24

40

40

22

28

36

12

634,756

606,020

954,617

855,647

645,071

1,283,469

694,131

1,532,714

1,238,455

829,071

1,365,285

851,756

750,867

795,018

818,492

839,747

628,860

1,199,270

824,553

708,517

1,201,402

855,515

752,489

1,345,399

1,336,222

703,467

670,397

1,039,445

339,548

-----------

9.00%

9.00%

8.75%

8.75%

8.75%

8.75%

8.75%

8.75%

8.75%

9.00%

8.75%

8.75%

8.75%

9.00%

8.75%

8.75%

8.75%

8.75%

9.00%

9.25%

9.25%

8.75%

9.00%

8.75%

8.75%

9.00%

8.75%

8.75%

10.62%

4,915

4,692

7,269

6,448

4,859

9,672

5,236

11,746

9,347

6,663

10,300

6,419

5,677

6,147

6,172

6,337

4,744

9,050

6,379

5,622

9,539

6,450

5,688

10,159

10,085

5,297

5,058

7,856

3,056

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

   

$26,300,200

===========

     

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE IV - MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 5



PARTNERSHIP
- -----------


# OF
UNITS
- -----



BALANCE
- -------


INTEREST
RATE  
- -------

MONTHLY
DEBT 
SERVICE
- -------


TERM 
(YEARS)
- ------

Seymour

Effingham

S.F. Winfield

S.F.Medicine Lodge

S.F. Ottawa

S.F. Concordia

Highland View

Carrollton Club

Scarlett Oaks

Brooks Hill

Greensboro

Greensboro II

Pine Terrace

Shellman

Blackshear

Crisp Properties

Crawford

Yorkshire

Woodcrest

Fox Ridge

Redmont II

Clayton

Alma

Pemberton Village

Magic Circle

Spring Hill

Menard Retirement

Wallis Housing

Zapata Housing

Mill Creek

Portland II

Georgetown

Cloverdale

S. Timber Ridge

Pineville

Ravenwood

37

24

12

16

24

20

24

78

40

44

24

33

25

27

46

31

25

60

40

24

24

24

24

24

24

36

24

24

40

60

20

24

24

44

12

24

1,234,652

800,619

330,924

452,074

569,320

553,238

711,699

2,670,795

1,383,559

1,455,720

729,909

900,078

724,063

736,252

1,314,581

928,081

741,887

2,076,101

1,282,240

733,403

692,394

666,293

730,604

635,530

651,430

1,123,006

625,689

426,623

975,606

1,428,298

580,870

738,200

755,273

1,060,244

318,736

724,266

-----------

8.75%

8.75%

11.37%

10.62%

10.62%

11.87%

8.75%

7.75%

8.25%

8.25%

7.75%

7.75%

8.25%

8.25%

8.25%

8.25%

8.25%

8.25%

8.25%

9.00%

8.75%

8.25%

8.75%

8.75%

8.75%

8.25%

8.75%

8.75%

8.75%

8.25%

8.75%

8.25%

8.75%

8.75%

8.25%

7.25%

9,346

6,032

3,016

4,049

5,126

5,498

5,473

18,064

9,870

10,398

4,937

6,129

5,172

5,264

9,389

6,632

5,302

14,842

9,402

5,673

5,355

4,760

8,018

4,782

4,913

8,018

4,715

3,688

7,377

10,192

4,388

5,265

5,693

7,986

2,318

4,595

50

50

50

50

50

50

40

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

   

$32,462,257

===========

     

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
SCHEDULE IV - MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
SERIES 6



PARTNERSHIP
- -----------


# OF
UNITS
- -----



BALANCE
- -------


INTEREST
RATE  
- -------

MONTHLY
DEBT 
SERVICE
- -------


TERM 
(YEARS)
- ------

Spruce

Shannon Apartments

Carthage

Mt. Crest

Coal City

Blacksburg Terrace

Frazier

Ehrhardt

Sinton

Frankston

Flagler Beach

Oak Ridge

Monett

Arma

Southwest City

Meadowcrest

Parsons

Newport Village

Goodwater Falls

Northfield Station

Pleasant Hill Square

Winter Park

Cornell

Heritage Drive S.

Brodhead

Mt. Vilage

Hazelhurst

Sunrise

Stony Creek

Logan Place

Haines

Maple Wood

Summerhill

Dorchester

Lancaster

Autumn Village

Hardy

Dawson

24

16

24

39

24

32

30

16

32

24

43

24

32

28

12

32

48

40

36

24

24

24

24

40

24

24

32

33

32

40

32

24

28

12

33

16

24

40

911,469

533,586

572,166

1,000,449

975,412

1,082,402

1,468,438

560,494

848,799

558,682

1,380,295

810,686

785,602

716,110

317,948

1,003,983

1,257,415

1,299,289

1,121,045

797,671

786,989

999,849

868,312

979,881

786,015

782,289

971,818

1,157,765

1,340,925

1,250,428

2,379,540

795,658

795,005

462,964

1,110,058

210,049

326,333

1,185,181

-----------

8.75%

8.75%

8.75%

8.25%

7.75%

8.25%

8.25%

7.75%

8.25%

8.75%

8.25%

8.25%

8.25%

8.75%

8.25%

8.25%

7.75%

7.75%

7.75%

7.75%

7.75%

8.25%

8.25%

8.25%

7.75%

8.25%

8.25%

8.75%

8.75%

8.25%

8.25%

7.75%

8.25%

7.75%

7.75%

7.00%

6.00%

7.25%

6,857

4,014

4,371

7,150

6,578

7,738

10,470

3,791

6,063

4,207

9,864

5,800

5,598

5,388

2,271

7,160

8,485

8,798

7,980

5,379

5,315

7,131

6,193

6,990

5,303

5,574

7,105

8,711

9,065

8,909

16,950

5,381

5,911

3,118

7,775

2,608

3,639

7,524

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

18

50

   

$35,191,000

===========

     



SIGNATURES



   Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


                                       GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
                                       (A Florida Limited Partnership)
                                       By:  Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.
                                       Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.




Date: July 9, 2002                     By:/s/ Ronald M. Diner
                                       Ronald M. Diner
                                       President



Date: July 9, 2002                     By:/s/ Sandra L. Furey
                                       Sandra L. Furey
                                       Secretary and Treasurer




SIGNATURES



   Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



                                       GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD.
                                       (A Florida Limited Partnership)
                                       By:  Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.
                                       Managing General Partner




Date: July 9, 2002                     By:/s/ Ronald M. Diner
                                       Ronald M. Diner
                                       President



Date: July 9, 2002                     By:/s/ Sandra L. Furey
                                       Sandra L. Furey
                                       Secretary and Treasurer