FORM 10-Q
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
(Mark One)
(X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
or
( ) TRANSITION REPORT PERSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______ to _______
Commission file number 0-19443
BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
04-3066791 |
(State or other jurisdiction |
(I.R.S. Employer |
of incorporation or organization) |
Identification No.) |
One Boston Place, Suite 2100, Boston, Massachusetts 02108
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (617)624-8900
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceeding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes |
X |
No |
_ |
BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004
BALANCE SHEETS
Three Months Ended SEPTEMBER 30,
Statement_of_Operations_Series_07 Page 12
Statement_of_Operations_Series_09 Page 13
Statement_of_Operations_Series_10 Page 14
Statement_of_Operations_Series_11 Page 15
Statement_of_Operations_Series_12 Page 16
Statement_of_Operations_Series_14 Page 17
SIX Months Ended SEPTEMBER 30,
Statement_of_Operations_Series_07 Page 19
Statement_of_Operations_Series_09 Page 20
Statement_of_Operations_Series_10 Page 21
Statement_of_Operations_Series_11 Page 22
SIX Months Ended SEPTEMBER 30,
Partners_Capital_Series_7 page 26
Partners_Capital_Series_9 page 26
Partners_Capital_Series_10 page 27
Partners_Capital_Series_11 Page 27
Partners_Capital_Series_12 Page 28
Partners_Capital_Series_14 Page 28
SIX Months Ended SEPTEMBER 30,
Cash_Flows_Series_7 page 30
Cash_Flows_Series_9 Page 31
Cash_Flows_Series_10 Page 32
Cash_Flows_Series_11 page 33
Cash_Flows_Series_12 page 34
Cash_Flows_Series_14 Page 35
BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004
Combined_Statements_of_Operations
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
BALANCE SHEETS
|
September 30, (Unaudited) |
March 31, (Audited) |
|
ASSETS |
|||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING |
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|||
Cash and cash equivalents |
1,623,366 |
1,749,417 |
|
Investments |
- |
- |
|
Notes receivable |
303,375 |
303,374 |
|
Deferred acquisition costs (Note B) |
874,115 |
898,393 |
|
Other assets |
415,908 |
381,162 |
|
$ 18,439,983 |
$ 20,278,411 |
||
LIABILITIES |
|||
Accounts payable |
$ 1,380 |
$ 1,380 |
|
Accounts payable affiliates (Note C) |
29,837,545 |
28,623,506 |
|
Capital contributions payable (Note D) |
236,345 |
236,345 |
|
30,075,270 |
28,861,231 |
||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL |
|||
Limited Partners |
|||
|
Units of limited partnership |
|
|
General Partner |
(1,700,624) |
(1,670,099) |
|
(11,635,287) |
(8,582,820) |
||
$ 18,439,983 |
$ 20,278,411 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 7
|
September 30, (Unaudited) |
March 31, (Audited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING |
$ - |
$ 52,288 |
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|||
Cash and cash equivalents |
11,181 |
12,216 |
|
Investments |
- |
- |
|
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
|
Deferred acquisition costs (Note B) |
- |
- |
|
Other assets |
5,497 |
5,500 |
|
$ 16,678 |
$ 70,004 |
||
LIABILITIES |
|||
Accounts payable |
$ - |
$ - |
|
Accounts payable affiliates (Note C) |
1,805,942 |
1,752,962 |
|
Capital contributions payable (Note D) |
- |
- |
|
1,805,942 |
1,752,962 |
||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL |
|||
Limited Partners |
|||
|
Units of limited partnership |
|
|
General Partner |
(107,820) |
(106,757) |
|
(1,789,264) |
(1,682,958) |
||
$ 16,678 |
$ 70,004 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 9
|
September 30, (Unaudited) |
March 31, (Audited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING |
$ - |
$ 222,660 |
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|||
Cash and cash equivalents |
221,154 |
243,617 |
|
Investments |
- |
- |
|
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
|
Deferred acquisition costs (Note B) |
15,658 |
16,092 |
|
Other assets |
127,229 |
127,579 |
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES |
|||
|
Accounts payable |
$ - |
$ - |
Accounts payable affiliates (Note C) |
6,453,925 |
6,194,767 |
|
|
Capital contributions payable (NoteD) |
- |
- |
6,453,925 |
6,194,767 |
||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL |
|||
Limited Partners |
|||
|
Units of limited partnership |
|
|
General Partner |
(401,718) |
(396,667) |
|
(6,089,884) |
(5,584,819) |
||
$ 364,041 |
$ 609,948 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 10
|
September 30, (Unaudited) |
March 31, (Audited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING |
$ 2,046,537 |
$ 2,287,645 |
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|||
Cash and cash equivalents |
168,634 |
184,427 |
|
Investments |
- |
- |
|
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
|
Deferred acquisition costs (Note B) |
61,945 |
63,667 |
|
Other assets |
2,151 |
2,500 |
|
$ 2,279,267 |
$ 2,538,239 |
||
LIABILITIES |
|||
|
Accounts payable |
$ - |
$ - |
|
Accounts payable affiliates (Note C) |
4,460,011 |
4,295,267 |
|
Capital contributions payable (Note D) |
- |
- |
4,460,011 |
4,295,267 |
||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL |
|||
Limited Partners |
|||
|
Units of limited partnership |
|
|
General Partner |
(224,926) |
(220,689) |
|
(2,180,744) |
(1,757,028) |
||
$ 2,279,267 |
$ 2,538,239 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 11
|
September 30, (Unaudited) |
March 31, (Audited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING |
$ 3,153,923 |
$ 3,616,386 |
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
281,517 |
331,830 |
Investments |
- |
- |
|
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
|
|
Deferred acquisition costs (Note B) |
31,401 |
32,271 |
|
Other assets |
116,762 |
86,781 |
$ 3,583,603 |
$ 4,067,268 |
||
LIABILITIES |
|||
|
Accounts payable |
$ - |
$ - |
|
Accounts payable affiliates (Note C) |
3,758,074 |
3,595,234 |
|
Capital contributions payable (Note D) |
22,528 |
22,528 |
3,780,602 |
3,617,762 |
||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL |
|||
Limited Partners |
|||
|
Units of limited partnership |
|
|
General Partner |
(216,655) |
(210,190) |
|
(196,999) |
449,506 |
||
$ 3,583,603 |
$ 4,067,268 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 12
|
September 30, (Unaudited) |
March 31, (Audited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING |
$ 4,516,965 |
$ 4,827,072 |
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
43,819 |
67,139 |
Investments |
- |
- |
|
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
|
Deferred acquisition costs (Note B) |
239,704 |
246,360 |
|
Other assets |
31,387 |
25,218 |
|
$ 4,831,875 |
$ 5,165,789 |
||
LIABILITIES |
|||
Accounts payable |
$ - |
$ - |
|
Accounts payable affiliates (Note C) |
4,675,901 |
4,474,748 |
|
Capital contributions payable (Note D) |
11,405 |
11,405 |
|
4,687,306 |
4,486,153 |
||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL |
|||
Limited Partners |
|||
|
Units of limited partnership |
|
|
General Partner |
(255,813) |
(250,462) |
|
144,569 |
679,636 |
||
$ 4,831,875 |
$ 5,165,789 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 14
|
September 30, (Unaudited) |
March 31, (Audited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING |
$ 5,505,794 |
$ 5,940,014 |
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
897,061 |
910,188 |
Investments |
- |
- |
|
|
Notes receivable |
303,375 |
303,374 |
|
Deferred acquisition costs (Note B) |
525,407 |
540,003 |
|
Other assets |
132,882 |
133,584 |
$ 7,364,519 |
$ 7,827,163 |
||
LIABILITIES |
|||
|
Accounts payable |
$ 1,380 |
$ 1,380 |
|
Accounts payable affiliates (Note C) |
8,683,692 |
8,310,528 |
Capital contributions payable (Note D) |
202,412 |
202,412 |
|
8,887,484 |
8,514,320 |
||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL |
|||
Limited Partners |
|||
|
Units of limited partnership |
|
|
General Partner |
(493,692) |
(485,334) |
|
(1,522,965) |
(687,157) |
||
$ 7,364,519 |
$ 7,827,163 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
|
|
||
Income |
|||
|
Interest income |
$ 1,793 |
$ 4,167 |
Other income |
3,562 |
29,922 |
|
5,355 |
34,089 |
||
Share of loss from Operating |
(916,478) |
(576,114)* |
|
Expenses |
|||
|
|||
Partnership management fee (Note C) |
558,826 |
564,854 |
|
|
Amortization |
12,139 |
12,139 |
General and administrative expenses |
171,610 |
210,705 |
|
|
742,575 |
787,698 |
|
NET LOSS |
$ (1,653,698) |
$ (1,329,723) |
|
Net loss allocated to limited partners |
$ (1,637,161) |
$ (1,316,426) |
|
Net loss allocated general partner |
$ (16,537) |
$ (13,297) |
|
Net loss per BAC |
$ (.08) |
$ (.07) |
|
*Includes gain on sale of Operating Partnerships of $238,000.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 7
|
|
||
Income |
|||
Interest income |
$ 11 |
$ 12 |
|
|
Other income |
- |
3,150 |
11 |
3,162 |
||
Share of loss from Operating |
(22,386) |
(20,885) |
|
Expenses |
|||
|
|||
Partnership management fee (Note C) |
17,193 |
25,893 |
|
|
Amortization |
- |
- |
|
General and administrative expenses |
11,493 |
12,272 |
|
28,686 |
38,165 |
|
NET LOSS |
$ (51,061) |
$ (55,888) |
|
Net loss allocated to limited partners |
$ (50,550) |
$ (55,329) |
|
Net loss allocated general partner |
$ (511) |
$ (559) |
|
Net loss per BAC |
$ (.05) |
$ (.05) |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Table_of_Contents
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 9
|
|
||
Income |
|||
|
Interest income |
$ 250 |
$ 2,376 |
|
Other income |
2,706 |
2,711 |
2,956 |
5,087 |
||
Share of loss from Operating |
(41,976) |
50,415* |
|
Expenses |
|||
|
|||
Partnership management fee (Note C) |
123,511 |
127,023 |
|
Amortization |
217 |
217 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
25,758 |
40,689 |
|
|
149,486 |
167,929 |
|
NET LOSS |
$ (188,506) |
$ (112,427) |
|
Net loss allocated to limited partners |
$ (186,621) |
$ (111,303) |
|
Net loss allocated general partner |
$ (1,885) |
$ (1,124) |
|
Net loss per BAC |
$ (.05) |
$ (.03) |
|
*Includes gain on sale of Operating Partnerships of $187,718.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Table_of_Contents
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 10
|
|
||
Income |
|||
|
Interest income |
$ 184 |
$ 157 |
Other income |
- |
5,433 |
|
184 |
5,590 |
||
Share of loss from Operating |
(154,250) |
(87,007) |
|
Expenses |
|||
|
|||
Partnership management fee (Note C) |
80,228 |
75,548 |
|
Amortization |
860 |
860 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
22,997 |
28,456 |
|
|
104,085 |
104,864 |
|
NET LOSS |
$ (258,151) |
$ (186,281) |
|
Net loss allocated to limited partners |
$ (255,569) |
$ (184,418) |
|
Net loss allocated general partner |
$ (2,582) |
$ (1,863) |
|
Net loss per BAC |
$ (.11) |
$ (.08) |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Table_of_Contents
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 11
|
|
||
Income |
|||
|
Interest income |
$ 309 |
$ 312 |
|
Other income |
0 |
3,583 |
|
309 |
3,895 |
|
Share of loss from Operating |
(273,495) |
(184,081) |
|
Expenses |
|||
|
|||
Partnership management fee (Note C) |
80,670 |
79,620 |
|
|
Amortization |
436 |
436 |
General and administrative expenses |
23,021 |
27,741 |
|
|
104,127 |
107,797 |
|
NET LOSS |
$ (377,313) |
$ (287,983) |
|
Net loss allocated to limited partners |
$ (373,540) |
$ (285,103) |
|
Net loss allocated general partner |
$ (3,773) |
$ (2,880) |
|
Net loss per BAC |
$ (.15) |
$ (.12) |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Table_of_Contents
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 12
|
|
||
Income |
|||
|
Interest income |
$ 66 |
$ 50 |
|
Other income |
- |
4,200 |
|
66 |
4,250 |
|
Share of loss from Operating |
(182,155) |
(126,986) |
|
Expenses |
|||
|
|||
Partnership management fee (Note C) |
95,389 |
94,052 |
|
|
Amortization |
3,329 |
3,329 |
General and administrative expenses |
31,557 |
32,738 |
|
|
130,275 |
130,119 |
|
NET LOSS |
$ (312,364) |
$ (252,855) |
|
Net loss allocated to limited partners |
$ (309,240) |
$ (250,326) |
|
Net loss allocated general partner |
$ (3,124) |
$ (2,529) |
|
Net loss per BAC |
$ (.11) |
$ (.09) |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Table_of_Contents
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 14
|
|
||
Income |
|||
|
Interest income |
$ 973 |
$ 1,260 |
|
Other income |
856 |
10,845 |
1,829 |
12,105 |
||
Share of loss from Operating |
(242,216) |
(207,570) |
|
Expenses |
|||
|
|||
Partnership management fee (Note C) |
161,835 |
162,718 |
|
|
Amortization |
7,297 |
7,297 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
56,784 |
68,809 |
|
225,916 |
238,824 |
|
NET LOSS |
$ (466,303) |
$ (434,289) |
|
Net loss allocated to limited partners |
$ (461,640) |
$ (429,946) |
|
Net loss allocated general partner |
$ (4,663) |
$ (4,343) |
|
Net loss per BAC |
$ (.08) |
$ (.08) |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
|
|
||
Income |
|||
|
Interest income |
$ 3,658 |
$ 9,636 |
Other income |
6,375 |
33,384 |
|
10,033 |
43,020 |
||
Share of loss from Operating |
(1,710,880) |
(1,299,506)* |
|
Expenses |
|||
|
|||
Partnership management fee (Note C) |
1,087,956 |
1,082,688 |
|
|
Amortization |
24,281 |
24,281 |
General and administrative expenses |
239,383 |
279,461 |
|
|
1,351,620 |
1,386,430 |
|
NET LOSS |
$ (3,052,467) |
$ (2,642,916) |
|
Net loss allocated to limited partners |
$ (3,021,942) |
$ (2,616,487) |
|
Net loss allocated general partner |
$ (30,525) |
$ (26,429) |
|
Net loss per BAC |
$ (.16) |
$ (.14) |
|
*Includes a gain on sale of Operating Partnerships of $238,000.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 7
|
|
||
Income |
|||
Interest income |
$ 25 |
$ 31 |
|
|
Other income |
- |
3,150 |
25 |
3,181 |
||
Share of loss from Operating |
(49,202) |
(42,461) |
|
Expenses |
|||
|
|||
Partnership management fee (Note C) |
42,064 |
50,764 |
|
|
Amortization |
- |
- |
|
General and administrative expenses |
15,065 |
16,366 |
|
57,129 |
67,130 |
|
NET LOSS |
$ (106,306) |
$ (106,410) |
|
Net loss allocated to limited partners |
$ (105,243) |
$ (105,346) |
|
Net loss allocated general partner |
$ (1,063) |
$ (1,064) |
|
Net loss per BAC |
$ (.10) |
$ (.10) |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Table_of_Contents
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 9
|
|
||
Income |
|||
|
Interest income |
$ 509 |
$ 5,424 |
|
Other income |
2,706 |
2,908 |
3,215 |
8,332 |
||
Share of loss from Operating |
(221,233) |
(88,822)* |
|
Expenses |
|||
|
|||
Partnership management fee (Note C) |
249,338 |
242,071 |
|
Amortization |
435 |
435 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
37,274 |
54,119 |
|
|
287,047 |
296,625 |
|
NET LOSS |
$ (505,065) |
$ (377,115) |
|
Net loss allocated to limited partners |
$ (500,014) |
$ (373,344) |
|
Net loss allocated general partner |
$ (5,051) |
$ (3,771) |
|
Net loss per BAC |
$ (.12) |
$ (.09) |
|
*Includes gain on sale of Operating Partnerships of $187,718.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Table_of_Contents
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 10
|
|
||
Income |
|||
|
Interest income |
$ 376 |
$ 379 |
Other income |
- |
5,510 |
|
376 |
5,889 |
||
Share of loss from Operating |
(241,108) |
(126,315) |
|
Expenses |
|||
|
|||
Partnership management fee (Note C) |
148,590 |
143,298 |
|
Amortization |
1,721 |
1,721 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
32,673 |
38,399 |
|
|
182,984 |
183,418 |
|
NET LOSS |
$ (423,716) |
$ (303,844) |
|
Net loss allocated to limited partners |
$ (419,479) |
$ (300,806) |
|
Net loss allocated general partner |
$ (4,237) |
$ (3,038) |
|
Net loss per BAC |
$ (.17) |
$ (.13) |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Table_of_Contents
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 11
|
|
||
Income |
|||
|
Interest income |
$ 631 |
$ 785 |
|
Other income |
2,319 |
5,500 |
|
2,950 |
6,285 |
|
Share of loss from Operating |
(462,462) |
(317,995) |
|
Expenses |
|||
|
|||
Partnership management fee (Note C) |
154,654 |
154,786 |
|
|
Amortization |
872 |
872 |
General and administrative expenses |
31,467 |
36,177 |
|
|
186,993 |
191,835 |
|
NET LOSS |
$ (646,505) |
$ (503,545) |
|
Net loss allocated to limited partners |
$ (640,040) |
$ (498,510) |
|
Net loss allocated general partner |
$ (6,465) |
$ (5,035) |
|
Net loss per BAC |
$ (.26) |
$ (.20) |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Table_of_Contents
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 12
|
|
||
Income |
|||
|
Interest income |
$ 143 |
$ 129 |
|
Other income |
- |
4,200 |
|
143 |
4,329 |
|
Share of loss from Operating |
(307,636) |
(272,823) |
|
Expenses |
|||
|
|||
Partnership management fee (Note C) |
175,036 |
174,894 |
|
|
Amortization |
6,658 |
6,658 |
General and administrative expenses |
45,880 |
44,047 |
|
|
227,574 |
225,599 |
|
NET LOSS |
$ (535,067) |
$ (494,093) |
|
Net loss allocated to limited partners |
$ (529,716) |
$ (489,152) |
|
Net loss allocated general partner |
$ (5,351) |
$ (4,941) |
|
Net loss per BAC |
$ (.18) |
$ (.17) |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Table_of_Contents
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 14
|
|
||
Income |
|||
|
Interest income |
$ 1,974 |
$ 2,888 |
|
Other income |
1,350 |
12,116 |
3,324 |
15,004 |
||
Share of loss from Operating |
(429,239) |
(451,090)* |
|
Expenses |
|||
|
|||
Partnership management fee (Note C) |
318,275 |
316,875 |
|
|
Amortization |
14,595 |
14,595 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
77,023 |
90,353 |
|
409,893 |
421,823 |
|
NET LOSS |
$ (835,808) |
$ (857,909) |
|
Net loss allocated to limited partners |
$ (827,450) |
$ (849,330) |
|
Net loss allocated general partner |
$ (8,358) |
$ (8,579) |
|
Net loss per BAC |
$ (.15) |
$ (.15) |
|
*Includes gain on sale of Operating Partnerships of $50,282.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|||
Distributions to Investors |
- |
- |
- |
Net income (loss) |
(3,021,942) |
(30,525) |
(3,052,467) |
Partners' capital |
$(9,934,663) |
$ (1,700,624) |
$(11,635,287) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Assignees |
General |
Total |
|
Series 7 |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
Distribution to Investors |
- |
- |
- |
Net income (loss) |
(105,243) |
(1,063) |
(106,306) |
Partners' capital |
$(1,681,444) |
$ (107,820) |
$(1,789,264) |
Series 9 |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
Distributions to Investors |
- |
- |
- |
Net income (loss) |
(500,014) |
(5,051) |
(505,065) |
Partners' capital |
$(5,688,166) |
$ (401,718) |
$(6,089,884) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Table_of_Contents
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Assignees |
General |
Total |
|
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
Distributions to Investors |
- |
- |
- |
Net income (loss) |
(419,479) |
(4,237) |
(423,716) |
Partners' capital |
$ (1,955,818) |
$ (224,926) |
$ (2,180,744) |
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
Distributions to Investors |
- |
- |
- |
Net income (loss) |
(640,040) |
(6,465) |
(646,505) |
Partners' capital |
$ 19,656 |
$ (216,655) |
$(196,999) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Table_of_Contents
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Assignees |
General |
Total |
|
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
Distributions to Investors |
- |
- |
- |
Net income (loss) |
(529,716) |
(5,351) |
(535,067) |
Partners' capital |
$ 400,382 |
$ (255,813) |
$ 144,569 |
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
Distributions to Investors |
- |
- |
- |
Net income (loss) |
(827,450) |
(8,358) |
(835,808) |
Partners' capital |
$(1,029,273) |
$ (493,692) |
$(1,522,965) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
2004 |
2003 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
|
|
|
||
Adjustments |
||||
Distributions from Operating Partnerships |
11,964 |
56,276 |
||
Amortization |
24,281 |
24,281 |
||
Share of Loss from Operating Partnerships |
1,710,880 |
1,299,506 |
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts payable |
1,214,040 |
1,517,415 |
||
Decrease (Increase) in other assets |
(34,747) |
(409,222) |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
(126,049) |
(154,660) |
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital Contributions paid to Operating |
- |
- |
||
Investments |
- |
- |
||
Proceeds from the sale of Operating Partnerships |
- |
238,000 |
||
Advances (made to) repaid from Operating |
- |
- |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
- |
238,000 |
||
Cash flows from financing activity: |
||||
Credit adjusters received from |
- |
- |
||
Distributions to Investors |
- |
(2,466,068) |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
- |
(2,466,068) |
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
(126,049) |
(2,382,728) |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
1,749,415 |
3,633,932 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ 1,623,366 |
$ 1,251,204 |
||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 7
2004 |
2003 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net Loss |
$ (106,306) |
$ (106,410) |
||
Adjustments |
||||
Distributions from Operating Partnerships |
3,086 |
9,698 |
||
Amortization |
- |
- |
||
Share of Loss from Operating Partnerships |
49,202 |
42,461 |
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts payable |
52,983 |
162,586 |
||
Decrease (Increase) in other assets |
- |
(109,222) |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
(1,035) |
(887) |
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital Contributions paid to Operating Partnerships |
- |
- |
||
Investments |
- |
- |
||
Advances (made to) repaid from Operating Partnerships |
- |
- |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
- |
- |
||
Cash flows from financing activity: |
||||
Credit adjusters received from |
- |
- |
||
Distributions to Investors |
- |
- |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
- |
- |
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
(1,035) |
(887) |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
12,216 |
9,823 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ 11,181 |
$ 8,936 |
||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 9
2004 |
2003 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net Loss |
$(505,065) |
$(377,115) |
||
Adjustments |
||||
Distributions from Operating Partnerships |
1,427 |
1,426 |
||
Amortization |
435 |
435 |
||
Share of Loss from Operating Partnerships |
221,233 |
88,822 |
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts payable |
259,158 |
259,159 |
||
Decrease (Increase) in other assets |
349 |
- |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
(22,463) |
(27,273) |
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital Contributions paid to Operating Partnerships |
- |
- |
||
Investments |
- |
- |
||
Proceeds from the sale of Operating Partnerships |
187,718 |
|||
Advances (made to) repaid from Operating Partnerships |
- |
- |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
- |
187,718 |
||
Cash flows from financing activity: |
||||
Credit adjusters received from |
- |
- |
||
Distributions to Investors |
- |
(1,943,184) |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
- |
(1,943,184) |
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
(22,463) |
(1,782,739) |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
243,617 |
2,030,872 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ 221,154 |
$ 248,133 |
||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 10
2004 |
2003 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net Loss |
$ (423,716) |
$ (303,844) |
||
Adjustments |
||||
Distributions from Operating Partnerships |
- |
21,437 |
||
Amortization |
1,721 |
1,721 |
||
Share of Loss from Operating Partnerships |
241,108 |
126,315 |
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts payable |
164,742 |
163,504 |
||
Decrease (Increase) in other assets |
352 |
- |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
(15,793) |
9,133 |
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital Contributions paid to Operating Partnerships |
- |
- |
||
Investments |
- |
- |
||
Advances (made to) repaid from Operating Partnerships |
- |
- |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
- |
- |
||
Cash flows from financing activity: |
||||
Credit adjusters received from |
- |
- |
||
Distributions to Investors |
- |
- |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
- |
- |
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
(15,793) |
9,133 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
184,427 |
121,830 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ 168,634 |
$ 130,963 |
||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 11
2004 |
2003 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net Loss |
$ (646,505) |
$ (503,545) |
||
Adjustments |
||||
Distributions from Operating Partnerships |
- |
- |
||
Amortization |
872 |
872 |
||
Share of Loss from Operating Partnerships |
462,462 |
317,995 |
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts payable |
162,840 |
362,840 |
||
Decrease (Increase) in other assets |
(29,980) |
(300,000) |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
(50,311) |
(121,838) |
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital Contributions paid to Operating Partnerships |
- |
- |
||
Investments |
- |
- |
||
Advances (made to) repaid from Operating Partnerships |
- |
- |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
- |
- |
||
Cash flows from financing activity: |
||||
Credit adjusters received from |
- |
- |
||
Distributions to Investors |
- |
- |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
- |
- |
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
(50,311) |
(121,838) |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
331,828 |
369,202 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ 281,517 |
$ 247,364 |
||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Table_of_Contents
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 12
2004 |
2003 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net Loss |
$(535,067) |
$(494,093) |
||
Adjustments |
||||
Distributions from Operating Partnerships |
2,470 |
8,813 |
||
Amortization |
6,658 |
6,658 |
||
Share of Loss from Operating Partnerships |
307,636 |
272,823 |
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts payable |
201,153 |
196,154 |
||
Decrease (Increase) in other assets |
(6,170) |
- |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
(23,320) |
(9,645) |
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital Contributions paid to Operating Partnerships |
- |
- |
||
Proceeds from the sale of Operating Partnership |
|
|||
Advances (made to) repaid from Operating Partnerships |
- |
- |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
- |
- |
||
Cash flows from financing activity: |
||||
Credit adjusters received from |
- |
- |
||
Distributions to Investors |
- |
- |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
- |
- |
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
(23,320) |
(9,645) |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
67,139 |
39,674 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ 43,819 |
$ 30,029 |
||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 14
2004 |
2003 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net Loss |
$ (835,808) |
$ (857,909) |
||
Adjustments |
||||
Distributions from Operating Partnerships |
4,981 |
14,902 |
||
Amortization |
14,595 |
14,595 |
||
Share of Loss from Operating Partnerships |
429,239 |
451,090 |
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts payable |
373,164 |
373,172 |
||
Decrease (Increase) in other assets |
702 |
- |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
(13,127) |
(4,150) |
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital Contributions paid to Operating Partnerships |
- |
- |
||
Investments |
- |
- |
||
Proceeds from the sale of Operating Partnership |
- |
50,282 |
||
Advances (made to) repaid from Operating Partnerships |
- |
- |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
- |
50,282 |
||
Cash flows from financing activity: |
||||
Credit adjusters received from |
- |
- |
||
Distributions to Investors |
- |
(522,884) |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
- |
(522,884) |
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
(13,127) |
(476,752) |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
910,188 |
1,062,531 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ 897,061 |
$ 585,779 |
||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
September 30, 2004
(Unaudited)
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") was
formed under the laws of the State of Delaware as of September 28, 1989, for the purpose of acquiring, holding, and disposing of limited partnership interests in operating partnerships which will acquire, develop, rehabilitate, operate and own newly constructed, existing or rehabilitated low-income apartment complexes ("Operating Limited Partnerships"). Effective as of June 1, 2001 there was a restructuring, and as a result, the Fund's general partner was reorganized as follows. The General Partner of the Partnerships continues to be Boston Capital Associates II Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership. The general partner of the General Partner is BCA Associates Limited Partnership, a Massachusetts limited partnership, whose sole general partner is C&M Management, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation and whose limited partners are Herbert F. Collins and John P. Manning. Mr. Manning is the principal of Boston Capital Partners, Inc. The limited partner of the General Partner is Capital Investme
nt Holdings, a general partnership whose partners are certain officers and employees of Boston Capital Partners, Inc., and its affiliates. The Assignor Limited Partner is BCTC II Assignor Corp., a Delaware corporation which is now wholly-owned by John P. Manning.
Pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, the Partnership filed a Form S-11
Registration Statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, effective
October 25, 1989, which covered the offering (the "Public Offering") of the
Partnership's beneficial assignee certificates ("BACs") representing
assignments of units of the beneficial interest of the limited partnership
interest of the Assignor Limited Partner. The Partnership registered
20,000,000 BACs at $10 per BAC for sale to the public in six series. The
Partnership sold 1,036,100 of Series 7 BACs, 4,178,029 of Series 9 BACs,
2,428,925 of Series 10 BACs, 2,489,599 of Series 11 BACs, 2,972,795 of Series
12 BACs, and 5,574,290 of Series 14 BACs. The Partnership issued the
last BACs in Series 14 on January 27, 1992. This concluded the Public
Offering of the Partnership.
NOTE B - ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING POLICIES
The condensed financial statements included herein as of September 30, 2004
and for the three and six months then ended have been prepared by the Partnership, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. No BACs with respect to Series 8 and Series 13 were offered. The Partnership accounts for its investments in Operating Partnerships using the equity method, whereby the partnership adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2004
(Unaudited)
NOTE - B ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING POLICIES - CONTINUED
Costs incurred by the Partnership in acquiring the investments in
Operating Partnerships are capitalized to the investment account. The
Partnership's accounting and financial reporting policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and include adjustments in interim periods considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results of
operations. Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been
condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. It is suggested
that these condensed financial statements be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Partnership Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
On July 1, 1995, the Partnership began amortizing unallocated acquisition
costs over 330 months from April 1, 1995. As of September 30, 2004, the
Partnership has accumulated unallocated acquisition amortization totaling
$461,334. The breakdown of accumulated unallocated acquisition amortization
within the Partnership as of September 30, 2004 for Series 9, Series 10,
Series 11, Series 12, and Series 14 is $8,265, $32,692, $16,569, $126,511, and
$277,297, respectively.
NOTE C - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Partnership has entered into several transactions with various affiliates of the general partner, including Boston Capital Holdings, LP., and Boston Capital Asset Management Limited Partnership as follows:
Accounts payable - affiliates at September 30, 2004 and 2003 represents
accrued general and administrative expenses, accrued partnership management fees, and advances from an affiliate of the general partner, which are payable to Boston Capital Holdings, LP., and Boston Capital Asset Management Limited
Partnership.
An annual partnership management fee based on .5 percent of the aggregate
cost of all apartment complexes owned by the Operating Partnerships has been
accrued to Boston Capital Asset Management Limited Partnership. Since reporting fees collected by the series were added to reserves and not paid to Boston Capital Asset Management LP, the amounts accrued are not net of reporting fees received.
Table_of_Contents
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2004
(Unaudited)
The partnership management fee accrued for the quarters ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 are as follows:
2004 |
2003 |
|
Series 7 |
$ 26,193 |
$ 26,193 |
Series 9 |
129,579 |
129,579 |
Series 10 |
82,371 |
82,371 |
Series 11 |
81,420 |
81,420 |
Series 12 |
95,817 |
95,817 |
Series 14 |
186,585 |
186,585 |
$ 601,965 |
$ 601,965 |
As of September 30, 2004, an affiliate of the general partner advanced a
total of $533,940 to the Partnership to pay certain operating expenses and to
make advances and/or loans to Operating Partnerships. These advances are included in Accounts payable-affiliates. No funds were advanced during the quarter ended September 30, 2004. Below is a table that breaks down the total advances, by series as of September 30, 2004.
2004 |
|
Series 7 |
$270,772 |
Series 9 |
4,960 |
Series 11 |
15,000 |
Series 12 |
70,550 |
Series 14 |
172,658 |
$533,940 |
Payables to affiliates will be repaid, without interest, from available cash flow or the proceeds of sales or refinancing of the Partnership's interests in Operating Partnerships.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2004
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS
At September 30, 2004 and 2003 the Partnership had limited partnership
interests in 301 and 304 Operating Partnerships, respectively, which own apartment complexes. The number of Operating Partnerships in which the Partnership had limited partnership interests at September 30, 2004 and 2003 by series is as follows:
2004 |
2003 |
|
Series 7 |
14 |
14 |
Series 9 |
53 |
53 |
Series 10 |
44 |
44 |
Series 11 |
40 |
40 |
Series 12 |
53 |
53 |
Series 14 |
97 |
100 |
301 |
304 |
|
Under the terms of the Partnership's investment in each Operating
Partnership, the Partnership is required to make capital contributions to the
Operating Partnerships. These contributions are payable in installments over
several years upon each Operating Partnership achieving specified levels of
construction and/or operations.
The contributions payable at September 30, 2004 and 2003 by series are as
follows:
2004 |
2003 |
|
Series 7 |
$ - |
$ - |
Series 9 |
- |
- |
Series 10 |
- |
- |
Series 11 |
22,528 |
22,528 |
Series 12 |
11,405 |
11,405 |
Series 14 |
202,412 |
202,412 |
$236,345 |
$236,345 |
|
The Partnership's fiscal year ends March 31 of each year, while all the
Operating Partnerships' fiscal years are the calendar year. Pursuant to the provisions of each Operating Partnership Agreement, financial results for each of the Operating Partnerships are provided to the Partnership within 45 days after the close of each Operating Partnership's quarterly period Accordingly, the current financial results available for the Operating Partnerships are for the six Months ended June 30, 2004.
Table_of_Contents
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2004
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 7
2004 |
2003 |
||
Revenues |
|||
Rental |
$ 1,383,062 |
$ 1,272,880 |
|
Interest and other |
237,317 |
118,679 |
|
1,620,379 |
1,391,559 |
||
Expenses |
|||
Interest |
469,064 |
457,902 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
347,511 |
324,562 |
|
Operating expenses |
867,135 |
792,754 |
|
1,683,710 |
1,575,218 |
||
NET LOSS |
$ (63,331) |
$ (183,659) |
|
Net loss allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership |
|
|
|
Net loss allocated to other partners |
|
|
|
Net loss suspended |
$ (13,496) |
$ (139,361) |
The Partnership accounts for its investments using the equity method of
accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Partnership adjusts
its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnerships results of
operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the
Partnership recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of
capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to
offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2004
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 9
2004 |
2003 |
||
Revenues |
|||
Rental |
$ 5,565,410 |
$ 5,899,740 |
|
Interest and other |
98,424 |
326,517 |
|
5,663,834 |
6,226,257 |
||
Expenses |
|||
Interest |
1,295,579 |
1,671,659 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
1,868,550 |
1,965,869 |
|
Operating expenses |
3,634,389 |
4,022,419 |
|
6,798,518 |
7,659,947 |
||
NET LOSS |
$(1,134,684) |
$(1,433,690) |
|
Net loss allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership |
|
|
|
Net loss allocated to other partners |
|
|
|
Net loss suspended |
$ (902,104) |
$(1,142,813) |
The Partnership accounts for its investments using the equity method of
accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Partnership adjusts
its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnerships results of
operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the
Partnership recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of
capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to
offset excess income.
Table_of_Contents
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2004
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
2004 |
2003 |
||
Revenues |
|||
Rental |
$ 3,654,160 |
$ 3,486,296 |
|
Interest and other |
137,623 |
176,861 |
|
3,791,783 |
3,663,157 |
||
Expenses |
|||
Interest |
919,850 |
893,049 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
1,076,106 |
1,087,740 |
|
Operating expenses |
2,416,816 |
2,332,131 |
|
4,412,772 |
4,312,920 |
||
NET LOSS |
$ (620,989) |
$ (649,763) |
|
Net loss allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund |
|
|
|
Net loss allocated to other partners |
|
|
|
Net loss suspended |
$ (373,671) |
$ (516,950) |
The Partnership accounts for its investments using the equity method of
accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Partnership adjusts
its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnerships results of
operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the
Partnership recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of
capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to
offset excess income.
Table_of_Contents
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2004
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
2004 |
2003 |
||
Revenues |
|||
Rental |
$ 3,433,696 |
$ 3,363,395 |
|
Interest and other |
131,470 |
203,920 |
|
3,565,166 |
3,567,315 |
||
Expenses |
|||
Interest |
854,165 |
901,768 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
1,202,099 |
1,201,421 |
|
Operating expenses |
2,341,754 |
2,235,517 |
|
4,398,018 |
4,338,706 |
||
NET LOSS |
$ (832,852) |
$ (771,391) |
|
Net loss allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund |
|
|
|
Net loss allocated to other partners |
|
|
|
Net loss suspended |
$ (362,061) |
$ (445,682) |
The Partnership accounts for its investments using the equity method of
accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Partnership adjusts
its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnerships results of
operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the
Partnership recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of
capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to
offset excess income.
Table_of_Contents
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2004
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
2004 |
2003 |
||
Revenues |
|||
Rental |
$ 4,199,531 |
$ 3,907,656 |
|
Interest and other |
221,558 |
251,116 |
|
4,421,089 |
4,158,772 |
||
Expenses |
|||
Interest |
1,084,506 |
940,364 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
1,227,192 |
1,240,308 |
|
Operating expenses |
2,813,881 |
2,756,163 |
|
5,125,579 |
4,936,835 |
||
NET LOSS |
$ (704,490) |
$ (778,063) |
|
|
Net loss allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund |
|
|
Net loss allocated to other partners |
|
|
|
Net loss suspended |
$ (389,809) |
$ (497,459) |
The Partnership accounts for its investments using the equity method of
accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Partnership adjusts
its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnerships results of
operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the
Partnership recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of
capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to
offset excess income.
Table_of_Contents
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2004
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
2004 |
2003 |
||
Revenues |
|||
Rental |
$ 8,280,038 |
$ 8,353,247 |
|
Interest and other |
232,349 |
336,484 |
|
8,512,387 |
8,689,731 |
||
Expenses |
|||
Interest |
1,869,131 |
1,973,460 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
2,474,233 |
2,478,578 |
|
Operating expenses |
5,810,786 |
5,481,934 |
|
10,154,150 |
9,933,972 |
||
NET LOSS |
$ (1,641,763) |
$(1,244,241) |
|
Net loss allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund |
|
|
|
Net loss allocated to other partners |
|
|
|
Net loss suspended |
$ (1,196,106) |
$ (730,427) |
The Partnership accounts for its investments using the equity method of
accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Partnership adjusts
its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnerships results of
operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the
Partnership recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of
capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to
offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2004
(Unaudited)
The taxable loss for the year ended December 31, 2004 is expected to differ from its loss for financial reporting purposes. This is primarily due to accounting differences in depreciation incurred by the Operating Partnerships and also differences between the equity method of accounting and the IRS accounting methods. No provision or benefit for income taxes has been included in these financial statements since taxable income or loss passes through to, and is reportable by, the partners and assignees individually.
Table_of_Contents
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Liquidity
The Partnership's primary source of funds was the proceeds of its Public Offering. Other sources of liquidity include (i) interest earned on capital contributions unpaid as of September 30, 2004 or on working capital reserves and (ii) cash distributions from operations of the Operating Partnerships in which the Partnership has invested in. These sources of liquidity, along with the Partnerships working capital reserve, are available to meet the obligations of the Partnership. The Partnership does not anticipate significant cash distributions from operations of the Operating Partnerships.
The Partnership has recognized other income as of September 30, 2004 in the amount of $6,375. The balance represents distributions received from Operating Partnerships, which the Partnership normally records as a decrease in the Investment in Operating Partnerships. Due to the equity method of accounting, the Partnership has recorded these distributions as other income.
The Partnership's currently accruing the annual partnership management fee to enable each series to meet current and future third party obligations. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, such liabilities will be deferred until the Partnership receives sales or refinancing proceeds from Operating Partnerships and at that time proceeds from such sales or refinancing will be used to satisfy such liabilities.
The Partnership has recorded $556,893 as payable to affiliates, which represents advances to pay certain third party operating expenses, advances and/or loans to Operating Partnerships, and accrued overhead allocations. The breakout between series is: $190,866 in Series 7, $4,960 in Series 9, $0 in Series 10, $15,401 in Series 11, $173,008 in Series 12, and $172,658 in Series 14. These and any future advances or accruals will be paid, without interest, from available cash flow, reporting fees, or proceeds of sales or refinancing of the Partnership's interest in Operating Partnerships. The Partnership anticipates that there will be sufficient cash to meet future third party obligations.
The Partnership offered BACs in a Public offering declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 25, 1989. The Partnership received and accepted subscriptions for $186,337,017 representing 18,679,738 BACs from investors admitted as BAC Holders in Series 7 through Series 14 of the Partnership.
Capital Resources (continued)
As of September 30, 2004 the Partnership had $1,623,366 remaining in cash and cash equivalents. Below is a table, which provides, by series, the equity raised, number of BAC's sold, final date BAC's were offered, number of properties acquired, and cash and cash equivalents.
Series |
Equity |
BAC's |
Final Close Date |
Number of Properties |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
7 |
$ 10,361,000 |
1,036,100 |
12/29/89 |
14 |
$ 11,181 |
9 |
41,574,018 |
4,178,029 |
05/04/90 |
53 |
221,154 |
10 |
24,288,997 |
2,428,925 |
08/24/90 |
44 |
168,634 |
11 |
24,735,002 |
2,489,599 |
12/27/90 |
40 |
281,517 |
12 |
29,710,003 |
2,972,795 |
04/30/91 |
53 |
43,819 |
14 |
55,728,997 |
5,574,290 |
01/27/92 |
97 |
897,061 |
$186,398,017 |
18,679,738 |
301 |
$1,623,366 |
||
Reserve balances are remaining proceeds less outstanding capital contribution obligations, which have not been advanced or loaned to the Operating Partnerships. The reserve balances for Series 7,9,10,11,12 and 14 as of September 30, 2004 are $11,181, $221,154, $168,634, $258,989, $32,414 and $694,649, respectively.
(Series 8) No BAC's with respect to Series 8 were offered.
(Series 13) No BAC's with respect to Series 13 were offered.
Table_of_Contents
As of September 30, 2004 and 2003 the Partnership held limited partnership interests in 301 and 304 Operating Partnerships, respectively. In each instance the Apartment Complex owned by the applicable Operating Partnership is eligible for the Federal Housing Tax Credit. Initial occupancy of a unit in each Apartment Complex which initially complied with the Minimum Set-Aside Test (i.e., initial occupancy by tenants with incomes equal to no more than a certain percentage of area median income) and the Rent Restriction Test (i.e., gross rent charged tenants does not exceed 30% of the applicable income standards) is referred to hereinafter as "Qualified Occupancy." Each of the Operating Partnerships and each of the respective Apartment Complexes are described more fully in the Prospectus or applicable report on Form 8-K. The General Partner believes that there is adequate casualty insurance on the properties.
The Partnership incurs a partnership management fee to Boston Capital Asset Management Limited Partnership in an amount equal to 0.5% of the aggregate cost of the apartment complexes owned by the Operating Partnerships, less the amount of certain asset management and reporting fees paid by the Operating Partnerships. The annual partnership management fee is currently being accrued. It is anticipated that all outstanding fees will be repaid from sale or refinancing proceeds. The partnership management fees incurred, net of reporting fees received, for the quarters ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 were $558,826 and $564,854, respectively.
The Partnership's investment objectives do not include receipt of significant cash distributions from the Operating Partnerships in which it has invested.
The Partnership's investments in Operating Partnerships have been made principally with a view towards realization of Federal Housing Tax Credits for allocation to its partners and BAC holders.
The General Partner and its affiliate, Boston Capital Asset Management Limited Partnership, monitor the operations of all the properties in the Partnership. The Operating Partnerships that are mentioned in the following discussion of each series' results of operations are being closely monitored so as to improve the overall results of each series' operations.
(Series 7) As of September 30, 2004 and 2003, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 14 properties, all of which were 100% at September 30, 2004.
For the six months being reported the series reflects a net loss from the Operating Partnerships of $63,331. When adjusted for depreciation, which is a non-cash item, the Operating Partnerships reflect positive operations of $284,180. This is an interim period estimate; it is not necessarily indicative of the final year end results.
Metropole Apartments Associates, L.P. (Metropole Apartments) incurred several capital improvements in 2003, including carpet replacement in all the common areas and new interior lighting in the hallways. These actions have resulted in stabilized high occupancy at the property. The residential section of the property has now achieved an occupancy rate of 97% through the third quarter of 2004 and rent collections are strong. The property is operating above breakeven through the third quarter as a result of the strong occupancy. On
May 8, 2003, the Investment General Partner received notice from the lender that property taxes have not been paid for the tax years 2001 and 2002. The total amount delinquent was $109,225.71. The lender gave a 60-day cure period in which to bring taxes current. The outstanding taxes were paid on July 9, 2003.
The Investment General Partner advanced the funds to the Operating Partnership to cure the delinquent taxes under a note that bears interest at prime + 1% and has a term of one year, renewable upon mutual agreement of the lender and borrower. The General Partner has executed the renewal. The Investment General Partner will no longer provide special disclosure on this partnership as operations have stabilized.
(Series 9) As of September 30, 2004 and 2003, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 99.7%. The series had a total of 53 properties at September 30, 2004. Out of the total, 51 were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six months being reported the series reflects a net loss from the Operating Partnerships of $1,134,684. When adjusted for depreciation, which is a non-cash item, the Operating Partnerships reflect positive operations of $733,866. This is an interim period estimate; it is not necessarily indicative of the final year end results.
Series 9 has invested in 3 Operating Partnerships (the "Calhoun Partnerships") in which the Operating General Partner is Riemer Calhoun, Jr. or an entity, which is affiliated with or controlled by Riemer Calhoun (the "Riemer Calhoun group"). The Operating Partnerships are Big Lake Seniors Apts., Blanco Seniors Apts. Ltd. and Pleasanton, Ltd. The affordable housing properties owned by the Calhoun Partnerships are located in Texas and consist of approximately 64 apartment units in total. The low income housing tax credit available annually to Series 9 from the Calhoun Partnerships is approximately $75,331, which is approximately 9% of the total annual tax credit available to investors in Series 9.
In the summer of 2002, the US Attorney for the Western District of Louisiana notified the Investment General Partner that the Riemer Calhoun group was under investigation by several federal agencies for the alleged manipulation of property cost certifications. In early 2003, the Investment General Partner learned that the US Attorney intended to bring criminal charges against certain members of the Riemer Calhoun group for falsifying the certified cost basis upon which the Louisiana Housing Finance Agency determined the tax credit calculation with respect to approximately 40 Operating Partnerships in which Series 9 is not an investor. The Investment General Partner used these certifications in determining the tax credits investors would receive through their investment in the Calhoun Partnerships. In effect, it appears that the contractor that built the apartment properties (an affiliate of Mr. Calhoun's) overbilled the respective Operating Partnerships, thereby improperly inflating the cost certificat ion and the amount of tax credit generated.
In late March, 2003, Reimer Calhoun, Jr. pleaded guilty to charges of wire fraud and conspiracy to commit equity skimming. At that time, the Investment General Partner obtained $1,282,202, currently held in escrow, from Reimer Calhoun for the purpose of offsetting any potential losses to tax credits caused by Mr. Calhoun's fraud.
On September 25, 2003, judgment in a criminal case was entered against Reimer Calhoun, Jr. and TF Management, Inc. On Count 1, alleging wire fraud, Reimer Calhoun, Jr. was sentenced to 60 months in the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons. On Count 2, Mr. Calhoun received a concurrent 60 month sentence. Mr. Calhoun's prison sentence began on October 13, 2003. Mr. Calhoun was further fined $500,000 and ordered to pay restitution of $4,363,683 to various parties. The amount of restitution ordered paid to the Investment General Partner was $1,559,723. This amount includes the monies previously paid by Mr. Calhoun. The additional $277,521 was received in December 2003.
The Investment General Partner has cooperated fully with the US Attorney in the investigation, and there has been no suggestion of any wrongdoing on the part of it or any of its affiliates.
In 2003, the Internal Revenue Service commenced an audit of the Calhoun partnerships in order to finally determine the amount of overstated tax credits. The Investment General Partner has reached a resolution with the IRS whereby the adjustments to tax credits will be made only for the tax years 2004 and thereafter in order to avoid amending tax returns already filed for the years 2001, 2002 and 2003. It is anticipated that final Closing Agreements will be entered into with the IRS for each of the partnerships in the next two to three months by year end. At this point, the Investment Partnerships have incurred substantial legal and accounting costs based upon Mr. Calhoun's fraud. It is anticipated that some of these costs will continue at least through completion of the Closing Agreements. It is further anticipated that the $1,559,723 will be sufficient to fully protect the investors and provide restitution to the Investment Partnerships affected.
With respect to each of the Calhoun Partnerships where Riemer Calhoun has been the Operating General Partner or in control of an entity which has been the Operating General Partner, the Investment General Partner and its affiliates are in the process of replacing them with another entity which is controlled by Murray Calhoun, the son of Riemer Calhoun. Murray Calhoun is the principal of Calhoun Property Management, L.L.C., which has provided property level management services for the apartment properties owned by the Calhoun Partnerships. Murray Calhoun also cooperated fully with the criminal investigation of his father, and the Investment General Partner and its affiliates have confirmed directly with the US Attorney that no evidence was found of any wrongdoing on the part of Murray Calhoun.
The Investment General Partner and its affiliates have undertaken discussions with the Rural Housing Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, in its capacity as first mortgage lender for each of the Calhoun Partnerships, to make sure that all of the mortgage loans are and will continue to be in good standing notwithstanding the overstated credit and the criminal prosecution resulting therefrom. RHS has also indicated that it will consent to the replacement of general partners noted above.
Finally, the Investment General Partner and its affiliates are reviewing their business dealings with the Calhoun Partnerships in general to attempt to determine if any other irregularities have occurred.
School Street II Limited Partnership (School Street Apts. II) is a 24-unit complex located in Marshall, Wisconsin. Occupancy through the third quarter of 2004 is 90%. Occupancy at the property had dropped slightly. There has been very little traffic at the property over the last 60 days. The market here is slow with very few phone calls to the property. Average vacancies in the area are running 15-17%. Management is currently running rental concessions since July. The current concession is "Move in and receive $1,500", which can be used any time during the lease term but not all up front, they must also fulfill the entire lease term or the credit will be removed from the account. Operations remain below breakeven due to high operating expenses and fluctuations in occupancy. The high operating expenses at the property are tied to an increase in advertising, unit turnover and higher utility cost. The management company has increased advertising in an effort to maintain high occupancy. Due to the strong competition from other properties, the property is unable to raise rents to cover the additional operating costs. Consequently, the Operating General Partner has examined alternatives to reduce utility usage and implement energy saving measures. The results of these efforts will not be available until fourth quarter. The Operating General Partner continues to fund any operating cash deficits. The mortgage, taxes, insurance, and accounts payables are current. The current mortgage for this property matures in December 2004. The Operating General Partner is currently negotiating with the lender to grant the extension.
Glennwood Hotel Investors (Glennwood Hotel) is 36-unit single room occupancy (SRO) development, located in Porterville, CA. Significant structural improvements, that at this time are physically and financially unfeasible, are required for the property to compete effectively in the market. The management agent continues to market the available units to the housing authority as well as performing various outreach efforts to attract qualified residents. The average occupancy during the third quarter of 2004 was 67%. Because of the high vacancy rate, the property will not achieve breakeven operations in 2004. The Operating General Partner continues to support the Operating Partnership financially. The mortgage, insurance and payables are current. The Investment General Partner continues to monitor this situation to ensure the property reaches the end of the tax credit compliance period in 2005.
Surry Village II Limited Partnership, (Surry Village II) is a 24-unit development located in Spring Grove, Virginia. Due to the low occupancy, the property continues to operate below breakeven through the third quarter of 2004. Year to date average occupancy through the third quarter is 85%. The property struggles with tenant retention. Management feels this is due to the lack of cable providers in the area and poor television reception. The property is located in a very isolated rural area with little local employment. Further the property does not have rental assistance and has difficulty finding qualified residents.
To date, management has had difficulty finding a resolution for the cable situation. They are looking into all available options to bring cable to the property. The Investment General Partner will continue to monitor the Operating Partnership on a monthly basis until it is able to increase occupancy.
Warrensburg Estates Limited Partnership (Warrensburg Estates), is a 32-unit property located in Warrensburg, Missouri. The property has operated at a deficit through the third quarter 2004 due to an average occupancy of of 81%. The property has suffered from low occupancy all three quarters of 2004; however, management is making efforts to reduce the number of vacancies. They are advertising daily in the local newspaper and have received approval from the state for an age limit reduction, permitted on a case by case basis. Currently there are no incentives offered; however, management is exploring incentive options. The Investment General Partner will continue to monitor this property and evaluate other marketing opportunities.
Pedcor Investments 1989-VIII, Limited Partnership (Port Crossing Apartments) is a 160-unit property located in Portage, Indiana. Average occupancy through third quarter 2004 is 85.70% and the property is expending cash. Occupancy was low in the first and second quarters; however, occupancy increased from 81% in the first half of 2004 to over 90% for both August and September as a result of management aggressively marketing the property through a resident referral incentive, direct marketing with businesses located nearby the property, and an interactive web-site. Management has also implemented a resident retention program, offering coupons for local eateries. The Replacement Reserve is funded and tax, insurance, and mortgage payments are all current. The Investment General Partner will continue to monitor the property to ensure occupancy stabilizes above 90% and above break-even operations is achieved. The property will reach the end of its compliance period on December 31, 2004. The Investmen t Limited Partner is actively negotiating the sale of its interest for sometime in early
The Operating General Partner of Corinth Housing Redevelopment Company (Adams Lawrence Apts.) has negotiated a sale of its General Partner interest, which was completed in August 2003. In addition to the transfer of Operating General Partner interest, an exit strategy has been put in place that will allow for the sale of the Investment Limited Partner interest to the new Operating General Partner at the end of the 15-year tax credit compliance period, which expires in December 2004. The proceeds payable to the Investment Partnership are $23,864.
The Operating General Partner of the Partnership Greenwich Housing Redevelopment Company (Cynthia Meadows) has negotiated a sale of its General Partner interest, which was completed in August 2003. In addition to the transfer of Operating General Partner interest, an exit strategy has been put in place that will allow for the sale of the Investment Limited Partner interest to the new Operating General Partner at the end of the 15-year tax credit compliance period, which expires in December 2004. The proceeds payable to the Investment Partnership are $21,477.
The Operating General Partner of the Partnership Wilmington Housing Redevelopment Company (Bonnieview Terrace) has negotiated a sale of its General Partner interest, which was completed in August 2003. In addition to the transfer of Operating General Partner interest, an exit strategy has been put in place that will allow for the sale of the Investment Limited Partner interest to the new Operating General Partner at the end of the 15-year tax credit compliance period, which expires in December 2004. The proceeds payable to the Investment Partnership are $14,318.
(Series 10) As of September 30, 2004 and 2003, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 99.9%. The series had a total of 44 properties at September 30, 2004, Out of the total, 43 were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six months being reported the series reflects a net loss from the Operating Partnerships of $620,989. When adjusted for depreciation, which is a non-cash item, the Operating Partnerships reflect positive operations of $455,117. This is an interim period estimate; it is not necessarily indicative of the final year end results.
Chuckatuck Square (Chuckatuck Square), a 42-unit complex located in Suffolk, Virginia, operated below breakeven in 2003 despite strong occupancy. Due to the operating deficit the auditor issued a "going concern" opinion in the 2003 audit. The property continues to operate below breakeven with an average of 84% through the second quarter of 2004. The property has suffered due to poor on-site management in the past. Both the regional and on-site manager have been replaced in 2004. A more experienced regional manager from within the management company has been assigned this property. The regional manager visits the property once a week to assist the new on-site manager. Management is working with the manager to control operating expenses and stabilize occupancy. This property will continue to be monitored on a monthly basis until it is able to increase occupancy, reduce operating expenses, and generate cash.
Lawton Apartments Company Limited Partnership (Village Commons) is a 58-unit, family property located in Lawton, MI. This property has historically had low occupancy, which has resulted in negative cash flow and delinquent taxes for the years 1998, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003. Average physical occupancy in the first and second quarter of 2004 was 69% and it remained at 69% through the third quarter of 2004.
Low occupancy is attributed to deferred maintenance issues and lack of employment in Lawton, combined with a high level of affordable housing in the surrounding area. The management company projects that approximately $110,000 is needed to make necessary deferred maintenance repairs. The Operating General Partner has not funded any capital improvements to date. Because of the declining financial and physical conditions of this property, the operating reserve, replacement reserve, and tax and insurance escrow have not been properly funded.
In May of 2002, Rural Development vouchered mortgage funds to pay real estate taxes for 1998, 2000, and 2001. This amount was added to the mortgage as additional debt creating higher monthly payments. However, the Operating Partnership was unable to support the higher debt payments and as result the mortgage payments have been delinquent for 12 months and the loan is in default. In May of 2003, Rural Development sent a letter to the Operating General Partner citing the mortgage delinquencies and Rural Development submitted the Operating Partnership to the State Attorneys General office to begin foreclosure proceedings. The General Partner has appealed the foreclosure actions and as of September 30, 2004 a court date has not been established. The Operating General Partner does not expect that Rural Development will foreclose on this partnership prior to the end of the compliance period, which is December 31, 2004.
Centreville Apartments Company Limited (Wood Hollow Apartments) is a 24-unit, family property located in Centreville, MI. This property had historically suffered from low occupancy. Occupancy averaged 85% in the first and second quarters and increased to 95% through the third quarter of 2004.
Despite the improvement in occupancy, the property still suffers from deferred maintenance. To make the necessary repairs, the management company has estimated that approximately $80,000 is needed. The Operating General Partner has not funded any capital improvements to date. Because of the declining financial and physical conditions of this property, the operating reserve, replacement reserve, and tax and insurance escrow have not been properly funded.
In May of 2002, Rural Development utilized mortgage funds to pay real estate taxes for 1998-2001. This amount was added to the mortgage as an additional debt resulting in higher monthly payments. Because the Operating Partnership was unable to support higher debt payments, the mortgage was in default. In May of 2003, Rural Development sent a letter to the Operating General Partner citing the mortgage delinquencies. Rural Development submitted the Partnership to the State Attorneys General office to begin foreclosure proceedings. The partnership has gone through two court appeals to stop the foreclosure process and both have been denied. In November, the Partnership is planning to file a suite with the Federal District court to contest the foreclosure proceedings. The Operating General Partner does not expect that Rural Development will foreclose on the Operating Partnership prior to the end of the compliance period, which is December 31, 2004.
Stockton Estates Limited Partnership (Stockton Estates), located in Stockton, Missouri, operated below breakeven during 2003. The property was severely damaged in a tornado during May 2003 and was uninhabitable through June 2004. The Operating General Partner rebuilt 12 of the 20 units. Construction was completed on June 30, 2004 and lease-up began at that time. As of September 30, 2004 11 of the 12 units were leased.
Dallas Apartments II, LP (Campbell Creek Apartments) is an 80-unit property located in Dallas, Georgia. Average occupancy for the first three quarters of 2004 was 81%. Occupancy is hindered at this property due to increase in competition and the age of the property. This property was developed in 1989 and does not have the amenities available in the newer apartment communities. Rental incentives and concessions are being offered to help attract potential residents. However, due to the generous concessions and collection losses, cash flow remained negative. The Investment General Partner will continue working with the management team to review their marketing and tenant screening process. The mortgage, taxes, and insurance are all current. The compliance period for this property will expire on December 31, 2004.
Newnan Apartments II, LP (Pines by the Creek Apartments II) is a 96-unit property located in Newnan, Georgia. The property's occupancy increased from 67% at the end of the second quarter to 81% at the end of the third. This improvement was due to generous concessions being offered by the management company. However, due to the concessions and collection losses, cash flow remained flat. At the end of August, the management of this property was transferred to a different regional manager. She is revising the property's marketing strategy and reviewing concessions to improve occupancy without increasing tenant receivables. She is also trying to improve tenant retention. The Investment General Partner will continue monitoring the operations of Pines by the Creek. The mortgage, taxes, and insurance are all current. The compliance period for this property will expire on December 31, 2005.
Washington Heights Apartments IV is a 24-unit complex located in Bismarck, North Dakota. Occupancy has fluctuated from quarter-to-quarter and as of the third quarter of 2004 average occupancy was 75%. This is largely the result of increases in new home sales and competition from newer multifamily developments. Management has increased their marketing efforts, offering rent concessions for new residents and lowering rents to retain existing residents. The Operating General Partner continues to fund the development as needed. Taxes and payables are kept current. The compliance period for this partnership expires on December 31, 2004.
(Series 11) As of September 30, 2004 and 2003 the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 40 properties, all of which were 100% at September 30, 2004.
For the six months being reported the series reflects a net loss from the Operating Partnerships of $832,852. When adjusted for depreciation, which is a non-cash item, the Operating Partnerships reflect positive operations of $369,247. This is an interim period estimate; it is not necessarily indicative of the final year end results.
In September of 2001, the Investment General Partner became aware that unauthorized distributions in excess of Rural Development's (mortgage) allowable limits were made to the Operating General Partner of Aspen Square Limited Partnership (Aspen Square Apartments), Copper Creek Limited Partnership (Copper Creek Apartments) and Sierra Springs Limited Partnership (Sierra Springs Apartments). These unauthorized distributions have been classified as receivables from the Operating General Partner on the Operating Partnerships audited financial statements as of December 31, 2003. The Investment General Partner is actively seeking the immediate return of these funds through the Estate of the Operating General Partner. Claims in the name of the individual Operating Partnerships have been filed against the Estate. On May 30, 2003, the Investment General Partner filed a complaint for the damages suffered by the misappropriations of funds against the Operating General Partner, the certified public accountant who per formed audits of the properties, a related corporation of the Operating General Partner who received some of the misappropriated funds, and the former, and current management companies. On May 24, 2004, a Settlement Agreement (the "Agreement") was successfully mediated with all parties named in the complaint filed in May of 2003. Currently, all legal action has been suspended pending the fulfillment of the terms of the Agreement. Under the terms of the Agreement the Estate will provide the Investment General Partner with quarterly accounting records, and if funds are available, make payments to the Investment General Partner against amounts owed to the Partnerships.
On April 7, 2003, the Operating General Partner was requested to cure all violations of the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership within 30 days, as required under the agreements. The Operating General Partner did not and to date has not cured the violations. Upon the expiration of the 30-day cure period, the requests for approval to remove the Operating General Partner were filed with the mortgagor as required under the loan documents. On April 9, 2004, the proposed removal of the Operating General Partner was approved by the mortgagor. The new Operating General Partner is an entity related to the Investment General Partner. The Investment General Partner and the new Operating General Partner have initiated the process of selling the properties. Any such sale will occur at the conclusion of the 15 year tax credit compliance periods.
Coronado Housing (Coronado Hotel Apartments) located in Tucson, Arizona is a 42-unit single room occupancy development with project-based Section 8 rental assistance for all the units. Occupancy dropped from 95% at the second quarter to 85% in October due to lack of tenant referrals from the city of Tucson. At the same time, the management company is discouraged from marketing independently. However, they were given permission to do so recently due to the low occupancy. Marketing effort is successful, and the property is expected to be 98% occupied by November. Despite the reduced income, the property is still able to support operating expenses. The Investment General Partner will continue monitoring the property's improving performance on a quarterly basis. The mortgage, taxes, and insurance are current. The Operating General Partner guarantee is unlimited in time and amount. The compliance period expires December 31, 2005.
Dallas Apartments II, LP (Campbell Creek Apartments) is an 80-unit property located in Dallas, Georgia. Average occupancy for the first three quarters of 2004 was 81%. Occupancy is hindered at this property due to increase in competition and the age of the property. This property was developed in 1989 and does not have the amenities available in the newer apartment communities. Rental incentives and concessions are being offered to help attract potential residents. However, due to the generous concessions and collection losses, cash flow remained negative. The Investment General Partner will continue working with the management company to review their marketing strategies and tenant screening process. The mortgage, taxes, and insurance are all current. The compliance period will expire on December 31, 2004.
Franklin School Associates (Franklin School Apartments) finished 2003 with a loss of roughly $20,000, which was funded by the Investment General Partner. During the first quarter of 2004, additional funding by the Investment General Partner totaling $30,650 was required due to lower than expected occupancy. The poor operations resulted from a management agent transfer at year end. The replacement manager found the property to be in much worse condition than those reported by the departing management firm. An additional claim for out of pocket payroll expenses and accrued management fees totaling $20,375 was paid in April to the former manager to avoid legal action. However, at the end of March, only four units were vacant representing a significant improvement over the 14 vacant at the start of January. At the end of September, only four apartments were vacant. The new property manager remains confident that a more hands on approach at the property will result in higher occupancy levels and lower turnover.
The mortgage, taxes and insurance are all current. However the loan servicer, Midland Loan Services, put the mortgage in a technical default because they have not approved the new manager in writing pending receipt of a signed management agreement. A signed agreement will be forwarded for their review and written approval during the fourth quarter.
London Arms/Lynn Mar Limited (London Arms Apartments) was able to operate above breakeven in 2003 due to increased occupancy and decreased operating expenses. Occupancy in 2003 averaged 99%; compared to the average occupancy in 2002 of 91%. Operating expenses in 2003 were significantly reduced from the prior year's level, particularly maintenance and administrative expenses. Maintenance expense continues to decrease from the previous year in 2004. Also, through the third quarter of 2004, the property is operating above breakeven and continues to maintain strong occupancy with an average of 99%. The Investment General Partner will no longer provide special disclosure on this partnership as operations have stabilized.
El Dorado Springs Estates Limited Partnership (El Dorado Springs Estates), located in El Dorado Springs, Missouri, operated below breakeven during 2003 due to low occupancy. As a result of improved occupancy the property has operated at breakeven through the third quarter of 2004. The average occupancy through the end of the second quarter is 89%. Because the property is located in an economically depressed area, occupancy will be an ongoing concern for this partnership. The property's mortgage, taxes and insurance are all current.
Newnan Apartments II, LP (Pines by the Creek Apartments II) is a 96-unit property located in Newnan, Georgia. The property's occupancy increased from 67% at the end of the second quarter to 81% at the end of the third. This improvement was due to generous concessions being offered by the management company. However, cue to the concessions and collection losses, cash flow remained flat. At the end of August, the management of this property was transferred to a different regional manager. She is revising the property's marketing strategy and reviewing concessions to improve occupancy without increasing tenant receivables. She is also trying to improve tenant retention. The Investment General Partner will continue monitoring the operations of Pines by the Creek. The mortgage, taxes, and insurance are current. The compliance period will expire in December 31, 2005.Nevada Manor, Limited Partnership (Nevada Manor) located in Nevada, Missouri, operated below breakeven in 2003. The operating deficit s resulted from the high vacancy rate at the property. The average occupancy for 2003 was 85.8%. Occupancy has improved to average 94% through the third quarter of 2004. As a result of the higher occupancy, the property operated above breakeven through the third quarter of 2004. Due to the improved operations, the Investment General partner will no longer provide special disclosure on its operations.
RPI Limited Partnership #18 (Osage Place) is a 38-unit, Rural Development subsidized senior property located in Arkansas City, KS. This Partnership had historically suffered from low occupancy and operating cash deficits. The average occupancy for 2003 was 76%. However, through the third quarter of 2004 occupancy has improved to 96%. During 2002, two affordable housing communities opened in Arkansas City, which added over 100 new apartments to the housing market. In response to the increased competition, the management company intensified leasing efforts by offering move-in specials for prospective tenants and has advertised in the newspapers and on local television. Additionally, the management company repainted the interior common areas and exterior trim of the building to enhance the physical condition and appearance of the property. Unaudited third quarter financial statements indicate that the property will breakeven in 2004. The mortgage, real estate taxes and insurance are current.Ivan Woods LDHA Limited Partnership (Ivan Woods Senior Apartments) is a 90 unit, senior complex located in Delta Township, MI. The Operating Partnership operated with average occupancy of 89% in 2003. Average occupancy through the third quarter of 2004 is 90%. The partnership was successfully reduced its operating expenses by $20,000, which has improved cash flow and resulted in a DCR of 1.29 through the third quarter of 2004. The compliance period expires in 2004 and the Operating General Partner is working with the Investment General Partner on an exit strategy.
Eldon Manor Limited Partnership (Eldon Manor) is a 24-unit property located in Eldon, Missouri. The property has operated with an average occupancy through third quarter 2004 of 88%; however, it is operating above breakeven. Occupancy has stayed above 90% since June and currently has only one unit vacant. Management advertises monthly in the local newspaper. The reserve replacement is funded to date and tax, insurance, and mortgage payments are current. The Investment General Partner will continue to monitor this property's occupancy.
(Series 12) As of September 30, 2004 and 2003 the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 99.9%. The series had a total of 53 properties at September 30, 2004. Out of the total, 52 were at 100% qualified occupancy.
For the six months being reported the series reflects a net loss from the Operating Partnerships of $704,490. When adjusted for depreciation, which is a non-cash item, the Operating Partnerships reflect positive operations of $522,702. This is an interim period estimate; it is not necessarily indicative of the final year end results.
In September of 2001, the Investment General Partner became aware that unauthorized distributions in excess of Rural Development's (mortgage) allowable limits were made to the Operating General Partner of Cananche Creek Limited Partnership (Cananche Creek Apartments) and Shawnee Ridge Limited Partnership (Shawnee Ridge Apartments). These unauthorized distributions have been classified as receivables from the Operating General Partner on the Operating Partnerships audited financial statements as of December 31, 2003. The Investment General Partner is actively seeking the immediate return of these funds through the Estate of the Operating General Partner. Claims in
the name of the individual Operating Partnerships have been filed against the Estate. On May 30, 2003, the Investment General Partner filed a complaint for the damages suffered by the misappropriations of funds against the Operating General Partner, the certified public accountant who performed audits of the properties, a related corporation of the Operating General Partner who received some of the misappropriated funds, and the former, and current management companies. On May 24, 2004, a Settlement Agreement (the "Agreement") was successfully mediated with all parties named in the complaint
filed in May of 2003. Currently, all legal action has been suspended pending the fulfillment of the terms of the Agreement. Under the terms of the Agreement the Estate will provide the Investment General Partner with quarterly accounting records, and if funds are available, make payments to the Investment General Partner against amounts owed to the Partnerships.
On April 7, 2003, the Operating General Partner was requested to cure all violations of the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership within 30 days, as required under the agreements. The Operating General Partner did not and to date has not cured the violations. Upon the expiration of the 30-day cure period, the requests for approval to remove the Operating General Partner were filed with the mortgagor as required under the loan documents. On April 9, 2004, the proposed removal of the Operating General Partner was approved by the mortgagor. The new Operating General Partner is an entity related to the Investment General Partner. The Investment General Partner and the new Operating General Partner have initiated the process of selling the properties. Any such sale will occur at the conclusion of the 15 year tax credit compliance periods.
Union Baptist Plaza, Limited Partnership (Union Baptist Plaza Apartments), located in Springfield, Illinois, suffers from below breakeven operations due to high operating expenses and a high interest rate on the first mortgage debt. The property has a history of high occupancy. However, high operating expenses particularly taxes and utilities, prevent the property from achieving breakeven. Due to the lack of cash flow, the 2002 property taxes became delinquent and accrued in the amount of approximately $22,810 plus interest. The lender and Investment General Partner are in the process of finalizing a refinance of the first mortgage which should be completed by the end of 2004. This should stabilize the economic condition of the property. Union Baptist Church, the current guarantor for the first mortgage and Operating General Partner has repeatedly delayed the refinance. The Operating General Partner had also refused to fund outstanding payables associated with the property. After numerous attempts to persuade the Operating General Partner to adhere to their responsibilities to the partnership, the Investment General Partner elected to submit the Operating General Partner a notice to perform or they would be removed. After receiving the letter to perform the Operating General Partner elected to fund the operating deficit associated with the property and proceeded with efforts to refinance. At this time the Operating General Partner is pursuing completion of refinance of the first mortgage. As of the end of the third quarter of 2004, the property's average occupancy had significantly improved to 100% versus 96% for the same period in 2003. As a result of increased stabilized occupancy the property has also managed to reduce outstanding payables. Currently the previously mentioned property taxes and audit expenses for 2002 and 2003 are the only outstanding payables of note. It is anticipated that all payables will be brought current upon completion of the refinance of the first mortgage.
Dallas Apartments II, LP (Campbell Creek Apartments) is an 80-unit property located in Dallas, Georgia. Average occupancy for the first three quarters of 2004 was 81%. Occupancy is hindered at this property due to increase in competition and the age of the property. This property was developed in 1989 and does not have the amenities available in the newer apartment communities. Rental incentives and concessions are being offered to help attract potential residents. However, due to the generous concessions and collection losses, cash flow remained negative. The Investment General Partner will continue working with the management team in reviewing their marketing strategies and tenant screening process. The mortgage, taxes, and insurance are current. The compliance period for this property will expire on December 31, 2005.
Newnan Apartments II, LP (Pines by the Creek Apartments II) is a 96-unit property located in Newnan, Georgia. The occupancy increased from 67% at the end of the second quarter to 81% at the end of the third. This increase was due to generous concessions being offered by the management company. However, cash flow remained flat due to the concessions and collection losses. At the end of August, the management of this property was transferred to a different regional manager. She is revising the property's marketing strategy and reviewing concessions to improve occupancy without increasing tenant receivables. She is also trying to improve tenant retention. The Investment General Partner will continue monitoring the operations of Pines by the Creek. The mortgage, taxes, and insurance are current. The compliance period for this property will expire on December 31, 2005.
Ivan Woods LDHA Limited Partnership (Ivan Woods Senior Apartments) is a 90 unit, senior complex located in Delta Township, MI. The Operating Partnership operated with average occupancy of 89% in 2003. Average occupancy through the third quarter of 2004 is 90%. After refinancing, the annual debt service payments decreased by over $36,000. The property has successfully reduced its operating expenses, which has improved cash flow and resulted in a DCR of 1.29 through the third quarter of 2004.
Lakeridge Apartments of Eufala, Ltd. (Lakeridge Apts.) is located in Eufala, AL and consists of 30 tax credit housing units. Eufala, AL is considered to be rural with a stagnant economy. Due to a lack of state funding, The Housing Authority of Eufala was unable to issue additional Section 8 vouchers, during 2003 and the first quarter of 2004. As a result occupancy at Lakeridge Apartments suffered greatly from these conditions. The site reported an average occupancy of 66% for 2003 and 63% for the first quarter of 2004. However, occupancy has averaged 92% for the second and third quarters. As of September 30, 2004, the site was 93% occupied. The increase in occupancy is due to the local housing authority's ability to issue new Section 8 vouchers and Management's increased focus on marketing. The site is currently operating slightly below breakeven due to the low first quarter occupancy. Management expects that occupancy will remain above 90% for the remainder of the year, which will allow them to dec rease the deficit and end the year at or near breakeven.
Windsor II Limited Partnership (Windsor Court II), a 24-unit development located in Windsor, Virginia. The partnership operated below breakeven in 2003 and through the third quarter of 2004 due to low occupancy levels and high operating expenses. Due to her poor performance, the on-site manager was replaced in June 2004. As of the third quarter, occupancy had already begun to increase and averaged 90%. The property continues to operate below breakeven because of the low occupancy in the first half of 2004. The Investment General Partner will monitor this deal on a monthly basis until it is able to stabilize occupancy, reduce expenses, and generate cash.Corcoran Investment Group (Corcoran Garden Apartments) is a 38-unit, family property located in Corcoran, CA. This property appears to have stabilized with an average occupancy of 98.25% through third quarter 2004 and operations above breakeven. The replacement reserve is funded, and tax, insurance, and mortgage payments are all current. As operations h ave improved and stabilized we will no longer provide special disclosure on this partnership.
Scott City Associates III, Limited Partnership (Oak Street Apartments) is an 24-unit family property located in Scott City, Missouri. The property has operated with occupancy of 96% through third quarter 2004, and is cash. This property appears to have achieved stability through increased occupancy and reduced operational costs but will continue to be monitored by the Investment General Partner.
Springfield Housing Associates Limited Partnership (Pinewood Apartments) is a 168-unit property located in Springfield, Illinois. Despite an average occupancy of 86% through third quarter 2004, the property is operating above break-even. Low interest rates are allowing more people to buy in this area; however, management continues to market aggressively through cold calls, billboards, newspaper ads, and a rental incentive of one month of free rent. The Replacement Reserve is funded and tax, insurance, and mortgage payments are all current. The Investment General Partner will continue to monitor the property and will work with management on determining effective marketing techniques for increasing occupancy in this market.
Woodside Apartments (Woodside Apartments) is a 32 unit property located in Grove City, Pennsylvania. There were a number of problems at the property in 2002 including unruly tenants, which resulted in a number of move outs. Management took action towards the end of the year and began evicting a number of tenants. The previous site manager has been terminated and has since been replaced by a new site manager that has made a strong effort to lease the vacant units. Occupancy continued to struggle in 2003 due to continued evictions and averaging 80% for the year. This decreased occupancy resulted in the property operating below breakeven in 2003. The efforts of the new site manager have resulted in improved occupancy through the third quarter of 2004, averaging 93%. The regional manager and the new site manager will continue to make efforts to maintain increased occupancy, while maintaining appropriate standards for accepting new tenants. The property is operating slightly below breakeven in 2004 due to a on e time insurance payment of $10,515. Had the property not made this full payment in the first month of the year, the property would be operating above breakeven. Provided operations remain stable through the remainder of the year we will no longer provide special disclosure on the operations of this partnership.
Fort Smith Housing Associates (Yorkshire Townhomes) is a 50 unit property located in Fort Smith, AR. The property suffers from low occupancy and high turnover due higher rents and market competition.
In 2003, the property had an average occupancy of 84% and DCR of .67. The manager was replaced in 2004 and a Police sub-station was placed at the property. In an effort to increase occupancy management has increased advertising, distributed flyers and visited all local employers for referrals.
As of September 2004 the average occupancy was 78% with two potential residents moving in by the end of the month. Management continues to work hard marketing the property but the lack of qualified tenants in the area has made it difficult to increase the occupancy. The Operating General Partner funds the development for any shortfalls. The property mortgage, taxes and insurance are all current. A former resident has filed a lawsuit naming Yorkshire Townhomes and owners regarding a claim of civil rights violation. The Plaintiff has demanded a trial by jury, which is expected to be heard in the first quarter of 2005.
(Series 14) As of September 30, 2004 and 2003 the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 99.9%. The series had a total of 97 properties at September 30, 2004. Out of the total, 97 were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six months being reported the series reflects a net loss from the Operating Partnerships of $1,641,763. When adjusted for depreciation, which is a non-cash item, the Operating Partnerships reflect positive operations of $832,470. This is an interim period estimate; it is not necessarily indicative of the final year end results.
Series 14 has invested in 4 Operating Partnerships (the "Calhoun Partnerships") in which the Operating General Partner is Riemer Calhoun, Jr. or an entity, which is affiliated with or controlled by Riemer Calhoun (the "Riemer Calhoun Group"). The Operating Partnerships are Blanchard Senior Apartments, Colorado City Seniors, Cottonwood Apts. II A LP and Hughes Springs Seniors Apts. ALP. The affordable housing properties owned by the Calhoun Partnerships are located in Louisiana or Texas and consist of approximately 104 apartment units in total. The low income housing tax credit available annually to Series 14 from the Calhoun Partnerships is approximately $117,109, which is approximately 4% of the total annual tax credit available to investors in Series 14.In the summer of 2002, the US Attorney for the Western District of Louisiana notified the Investment General Partner that the Riemer Calhoun group was under investigation by several federal agencies for the alleged manipulati on of property cost certifications. In early 2003, the Investment General Partner learned that the US Attorney intended to bring criminal charges against certain members of the Riemer Calhoun group for falsifying the certified cost basis upon which the Louisiana Housing Finance Agency determined the tax credit calculation with respect to approximately 40 Operating Partnerships in which Series 9 is not an investor. The Investment General Partner used these certifications in determining the tax credits investors would receive through their investment in the Calhoun Partnerships. In effect, it appears that the contractor that built the apartment properties (an affiliate of Mr. Calhoun's) overbilled the respective Operating Partnerships, thereby improperly inflating the cost certification and the amount of tax credit generated.
In late March 2003, Reimer Calhoun, Jr. pleaded guilty to charges of wire fraud and conspiracy to commit equity skimming. At that time, the Investment General Partner obtained $1,282,202, currently held in escrow, from Reimer Calhoun for the purpose of offsetting any potential losses to tax credits caused by Mr. Calhoun's fraud.
On September 25, 2003, judgment in a criminal case was entered against Reimer Calhoun, Jr. and TF Management, Inc. On Count 1, alleging wire fraud, Reimer Calhoun, Jr. was sentenced to 60 months in the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons. On Count 2, Mr. Calhoun received a concurrent 60 month sentence. Mr. Calhoun's prison sentence began on October 13, 2003. Mr. Calhoun was further fined $500,000 and ordered to pay restitution of $4,363,683 to various parties. The amount of restitution ordered paid to the Investment General Partner was $1,559,723. This amount includes the monies previously paid by Mr. Calhoun. The additional $277,521 was received in December 2003.
The Investment General Partner has cooperated fully with the US Attorney in the investigation, and there has been no suggestion of any wrongdoing on the part of it or any of its affiliates.
In 2003, the Internal Revenue Service commenced an audit of the Calhoun partnerships in order to finally determine the amount of overstated tax credits. The Investment General Partner has reached a resolution with the IRS whereby the adjustments to tax credits will be made only for the tax years 2004 and thereafter in order to avoid amending tax returns already filed for the years 2001, 2002 and 2003. It is anticipated that final Closing Agreements will be entered into with the IRS for each of the partnerships in the next two to three months by year end. At this point, the Investment Partnerships have incurred substantial legal and accounting costs based upon Mr. Calhoun's fraud. It is anticipated that some of these costs will continue at least through completion of the Closing Agreements. It is further anticipated that the $1,559,723 will be sufficient to fully protect the investors and provide restitution to the Investment Partnerships affected.
With respect to each of the Calhoun Partnerships where Riemer Calhoun has been the Operating General Partner or in control of an entity which has been the Operating General Partner, the Investment General Partner and its affiliates are in the process of replacing them with another entity which is controlled by Murray Calhoun, the son of Riemer Calhoun. Murray Calhoun is the principal of Calhoun Property Management, L.L.C., which has provided property level management services for the apartment properties owned by the Calhoun Partnerships. Murray Calhoun also cooperated fully with the criminal investigation of his father, and the Investment General Partner and its affiliates have confirmed directly with the US Attorney that no evidence was found of any wrongdoing on the part of Murray Calhoun.
The Investment General Partner and its affiliates have undertaken discussions with the Rural Housing Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, in its capacity as first mortgage lender for each of the Calhoun Partnerships, to make sure that all of the mortgage loans are and will continue to be in good standing notwithstanding the overstated credit and the criminal prosecution resulting therefrom. RHS has also indicated that it will consent to the replacement of general partners noted above.
Finally, the Investment General Partner and its affiliates are reviewing their business dealings with the Calhoun Partnerships in general to attempt to determine if any other irregularities have occurred.
One Northridge, LTD., in Arlington Texas is located between Dallas and Fort Worth. The community consists of 126 units. The property continues to experience problems with high payables, low occupancy, and deferred maintenance. As of June 29, 2004 the Operating General Partner reported outstanding payables of $235,847. The Operating General Partner has not provided financial reports since March. The Operating General Partner is attempting to supervise the daily operation and is currently seeking a buyer for the asset. The Investment General Partner completed a complete file audit in June 2004. The general condition of the asset, lack of marketing efforts, and the turnover of the staff continue to be contributing factors to the low occupancy. Lease percentages continue to lag in the market sector at 66% with the market area in the mid 90's. A replacement General Partner is being considered to turn around operations, make improvements to the property, and re-initiate reporting.
Summer Lane Limited Partnership (Summer Lane Apartments) is a 24 unit, family complex located in Santee, SC. In the first quarter of 2003, the Operating General Partner applied through Rural Development for a restructure of their mortgage to reduce their monthly mortgage payment and bring the Replacement Reserve account current. After nearly two years of negotiations, the plan was approved and the mortgage is scheduled to be re-amortized in the fourth quarter of 2004. Once the re-amortization is complete, Rural Development will consider the Replacement Reserve account current. The monthly mortgage payment will be reduced by approximately $2,000. Due to management changes during 2004, which included the replacement of the on site manager, the average occupancy for the third quarter increased to 99% from an average of 86% for the second quarter. Due to the increase in occupancy and reduction of operating expenses the property generated cash flow through the third quarter of 2004. The Investment Partn
er is confident that once the mortgage re-amortization is finalized the property will stabilize through the end of the compliance period.
Woodfield Commons Limited Partnership (Woodfield Commons Apartments) is a 46 unit development located in Marshfield, WI. The property received 60-Day letters issued by the IRS stating that the Operating Partnership had not met certain Internal Revenue Code Section 42 requirements for the tax years 1993-1998. The 60-Day letters were the result of an IRS audit of the Operating Partnership's tenant files. As a result of their audit, the IRS had proposed an adjustment that would disallow 100% of past and future tax credits. The adjustment would also include interest and penalties on the tax credits taken to date. The Investment General Partner and its counsel along with the Operating General Partner and its counsel filed an appeal and on February 19, 2004, the IRS issued a No Adjustments Letter. A favorable settlement was reached and the audit completed without any changes to the Operating Partnership tax returns for the years ending 1993-1998.The property operated with an average occupancy of 87% for the year 2003. The occupancy has increased to an average of 94% through the third quarter of 2004. The operating expenses continue to stay below the state average. Although the occupancy increased, the low rental rates in the area prevented the property from achieving breakeven operations through the third quarter of 2004. The management agent continues to market the available units by working closely with the housing authority and uses various marketing efforts to attract qualified residents. The Operating General Partner continues to financially support the partnership. The mortgage, taxes, insurance and payables are current.Montague Place, LP (Montague Place Apartments) is a 28-unit, family complex located in Caro, MI. The property was originally designated a senior complex and it had a history of low occupancy because there was a shortage of eligible residents in the area. The Operating General Partner requested that the property be converted from a senior property to a family property in order to increase the number of qualified residents. Rural Development approved the property conversion effective September 1, 2002.
The Operating Partnership suffered from low occupancy during 2003, which averaged 81%. Through the third quarter of 2004, this property was operating with average occupancy of 86%. To increase occupancy, the Regional Manager increased marketing efforts by offering rental concessions. However, due to poor market conditions in the region occupancy is not improving. The management company is optimistic that with the implementation of different marketing strategies such as community outreach, residential referral programs, and increased advertisement, the occupancy should improve in the fourth quarter of 2004. Kilmarnock Limited Partnership (Indian Creek Apts.) is a 20-unit development located in Kilmarnock, Virginia. The property generated a small amount of cash in 2003, due to a workout plan with Rural Development. Average occupancy was 90.42% in 2003 and 86% through the third quarter of 2004. The property is located in a very rural area and the property suffers from lack of qualified applicants. There
was an on-site management change in mid-2003. Despite low occupancy, the property continues to operate above breakeven through the third quarter of 2004. The Investment General Partner will monitor this deal on a monthly basis until it is able to stabilize occupancy and generate strong cash flow. The Operating General Partner of Schroon Lake Housing Redevelopment Company (Lakeside Manor Apts.) has negotiated a sale of its General Partner interest, which was completed in August 2003. In addition to the transfer of Operating General Partner interest, an exit strategy has been put in place that will allow for the sale of the Investment Limited Partner interest to the new Operating General Partner at the end of the 15-year tax credit compliance period, which expires in December 2006. The proceeds to the Investment Partnership are $14,318.
Townview Apartments, a Limited Partnership (Townview Apartments) is a 26 unit property located in St. Mary's, Pennsylvania. The key issues affecting the property's operations are rent levels and decreased occupancy. In 2003, there was a rent increase of $13 per unit. However, occupancy in 2003 averaged 86%, a substantial decrease from the previous year. Due to the decrease in occupancy and an increase in operating expenses, the property operated below breakeven in 2003. The site manager retired from this property mid year. Prior to the manager's retirement, lease-up activity became lax and the property's occupancy struggled as a result. The site's occupancy continues to struggle against the competition in the area in 2004. There are a number of HUD properties in the area that offer lower rent. A new site manager has since taken over at the property and is working diligently on returning occupancy to a level that will allow the property to breakeven. So far, through the third quarter, the property is operatin
g with an average occupancy of 77%. The property received a rent increase of $12 per unit in 2004; however the property is operating below breakeven through the third quarter as a result of decreased occupancy. The Investment General Partner will continue to monitor operations at this property.In February 2004, Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund I - Series 5 and Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II - Series 14 negotiated a sale of their Investment Limited Partner interests in Glenhaven Park Partners (Glenhaven Park) to the Operating General Partner for total proceeds of $28,760. Of the total
received $6,000 actually was for payment of outstanding reporting fees and $22,760 was proceeds from the sale of the interests. The total sale proceeds received were used to repay subordinated loans that had been made by Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II-Series 14. Total outstanding subordinated loans and advances made by Series 14 exceeded the repayment by $156,940. The unpaid loans and advances were written off and included in the gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership for Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II - Series 14.
In February 2004, Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund I - Series 4 and Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II-Series 14 negotiated a transfer of their Investment Limited Partner interest in Haven Park Partners II, A California LP (Glenhaven Park II) to the Operating General Partner for total proceeds of $715,000. Of the total received $4,500 actually was for payment of an outstanding reporting fee and $710,500 was proceeds from the transfer of the interest. Of the total proceeds received $504,941 was utilized to repay subordinated loans that had been made by Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II-Series 14 and Haven Park Housing Corp. Remaining sale proceeds paid to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund I-Series 4 (BCTC I) and Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II-Series 14 (BCTC II) were $26,374 and $179,185, respectively. The allocation of the amounts between the two Investment Limited Partnerships was based on their percentage ownership in the Operating Partnership. Of the proceeds received, it is estimated that approximat ely $5,793 and $39,360, for Series 4 and Series 14, respectively, will be distributed to the investors. Provided that these are the actual amounts distributed, the investor per BAC distributions will be $.002 and $.007, respectively, for Series 4 and 14. The total returned to the investors will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor. The remaining proceeds totalling $146,906 has been anticipated to be paid to BCAMLP for fees and expenses related to the sale and partial reimbursement of amounts payable to affiliates. The breakdown of the amount to be paid to BCAMLP is as follows: $21,450 represents a fee for overseeing and managing the disposition of the property; $9,000 represents a reimbursement of expenses incurred which were associated with the disposition and $129,956 represents a partial payment of outstanding Asset Management Fees due to BCAMLP. Since the Investment in Operating Partnerships balances of Haven Park Partners II for Series 4 and Series 14 were not equal to t he sale proceeds received by each series, Series 4 and Series 14 recorded gains on the sale of the Operating Partnership of $20,889 and $179,188, respectively.
Principal Accounting Policies and Estimates
The financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which requires the Partnership to make certain estimates and assumptions. A summary of significant accounting policies is provided in Note 1 to the financial statements. The following section is a summary of certain aspects of those accounting policies that may require subjective or complex judgments and are most important to the portrayal of Partnership's financial condition and results of operations. The Partnership believes that there is a low probability that the use of different estimates or assumptions in making these judgments would result in materially different amounts being reported in the financial statements.
The Partnership is required to assess potential impairments to its long-lived assets, which is primarily investments in limited partnerships. The Partnership accounts for its investment in limited partnerships in accordance with the equity method of accounting since the Partnership does not control the operations of the Operating Limited Partnership.
If the book value of the Partnership's investment in an Operating Partnership exceeds the estimated value derived by management, which generally consists of the remaining future Low-Income Housing Credits allocable to the Partnership and the estimated residual value to the Partnership, the Partnership reduces its investment in any such Operating Limited Partnership and includes such reduction in equity in loss of investment of limited partnerships.
Item 3 |
|
Not Applicable |
Item 4 |
Controls & Procedures |
|
(a) |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
|
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Partnership's General Partner, under the supervision and with the participation of the Principle Executive Officer and Principle Financial Officer of C&M Management, Inc. carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Partnership's "disclosure controls and procedures" as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15. Based on that evaluation, the Principle Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Partnership required to be included in the Partnership's periodic SEC filings. |
||
(b) |
Changes in Internal Controls |
|
There were no changes in the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2004 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting. |
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. |
Legal Proceedings |
||
None |
|||
Item 2. |
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
||
None |
|||
Item 3. |
Defaults upon Senior Securities |
||
None |
|||
Item 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security |
||
None |
|||
Item 5. |
Other Information |
||
None |
|||
Item 6. |
Exhibits |
||
(a)Exhibits |
|||
31.a Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer, filed herein |
|||
31.b Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer, filed herein |
|||
32.a Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer, filed herein |
|||
32.b Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer, filed herein |
|||
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Partnership has duly caused this Report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership |
|||
By: |
Boston Capital Associates II Limited |
||
By: |
BCA Associates Limited Partnership, |
||
By: |
C&M Management, Inc., |
||
Date: November 19, 2004 |
/s/ John P. Manning |
||
John P. Manning |
|||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on
behalf of the Partnership and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated:
DATE: |
SIGNATURE: |
TITLE: |
November 19, 2004 |
/s/ John P. Manning John P. Manning |
Director, President |
DATE: |
SIGNATURE: |
TITLE: |
November 19, 2004 |
/s/ Marc N. Teal Marc N. Teal |
Chief Financial Officer |