SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-15381
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE |
|
36-3498354 |
507 West Tenth Street
West Point, Georgia 31833
(Address of principal executive offices, including Zip Code)
(706) 645-4000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
Common shares outstanding at June 30, 2004: 49,897,409 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes X No
1
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page No. |
|
|
|
|
|
PART I. |
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets: |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited); Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2003 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited); Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2003 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (Unaudited); Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
|
7 - 25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
26 - 41 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk |
42 |
|||
|
|
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
PART II. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
|
43 - 45 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
45 |
|||
|
|
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
|
46 |
2
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)
June 30, |
December 31, |
|||||
2004 |
2003 |
|||||
(Unaudited) |
||||||
Assets |
||||||
Current Assets |
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents . |
$ |
10,096 |
$ |
3,660 |
||
Accounts receivable |
229,872 |
243,507 |
||||
Inventories |
417,291 |
368,620 |
||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
20,157 |
32,996 |
||||
Total current assets |
677,416 |
648,783 |
||||
Property, Plant and Equipment, net |
592,264 |
616,422 |
||||
Other Assets |
||||||
Deferred financing fees |
6,082 |
12,837 |
||||
Other assets |
1,110 |
1,737 |
||||
$ |
1,276,872 |
$ |
1,279,779 |
|||
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) |
||||||
Current Liabilities |
||||||
Senior Credit Facility |
$ |
486,419 |
$ |
490,689 |
||
Second-Lien Facility |
165,000 |
165,000 |
||||
DIP Credit Agreement |
136,137 |
89,017 |
||||
Accrued interest payable |
5,611 |
295 |
||||
Accounts payable |
51,974 |
56,198 |
||||
Other accrued liabilities |
140,638 |
111,731 |
||||
Total current liabilities |
985,779 |
912,930 |
||||
Noncurrent Liabilities |
||||||
Deferred income taxes |
5,373 |
87,179 |
||||
Pension and other liabilities |
144,994 |
141,936 |
||||
Total noncurrent liabilities |
150,367 |
229,115 |
||||
Liabilities Subject to Compromise |
1,087,450 |
1,086,869 |
||||
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) |
(946,724) |
(949,135) |
||||
$ |
1,276,872 |
$ |
1,279,779 |
|||
See accompanying notes.
3
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
||||||||||||
June 30, |
June 30, |
||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||
Net sales |
$382,992 |
$365,695 |
$782,632 |
$744,958 |
|||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
330,667 |
307,994 |
662,141 |
613,862 |
|||||||||
Gross earnings |
52,325 |
57,701 |
120,491 |
131,096 |
|||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
56,292 |
60,937 |
112,077 |
124,400 |
|||||||||
Restructuring and impairment charge |
3,473 |
11,946 |
8,286 |
13,324 |
|||||||||
Goodwill impairment charge |
- |
46,298 |
- |
46,298 |
|||||||||
Operating earnings (loss) |
(7,440) |
(61,480) |
128 |
(52,926) |
|||||||||
Interest expense (contractual interest of |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other expense (income)-net |
(1,820) |
7,924 |
1,010 |
10,429 |
|||||||||
Chapter 11 expenses |
8,383 |
6,244 |
16,502 |
6,244 |
|||||||||
Loss before income tax benefit |
(33,102) |
(106,842) |
(54,296) |
(133,258) |
|||||||||
Income tax benefit |
(9,108) |
(34,795) |
(15,423) |
(44,305) |
|||||||||
Net loss |
$(23,994) |
$(72,047) |
$(38,873) |
$(88,953) |
|||||||||
Basic and diluted net loss per common share |
$ (.48) |
$ (1.44) |
$ (.78) |
$ (1.78) |
|||||||||
Basic and diluted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
See accompanying notes.
4
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
(In thousands)
Six Months Ended |
|||||||||||
June 30, |
|||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(38,873) |
|
$ |
(88,953) |
|||||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
33,300 |
|
|
|
37,748 |
|
||
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(15,439) |
|
|
(44,245) |
||||
Changes in working capital |
|
|
(17,667) |
|
|
39,181 |
|||||
|
Other-net |
|
|
5,837 |
|
|
14,829 |
||||
Non-cash component of restructuring and |
1,818 |
6,959 |
|||||||||
Goodwill impairment charge |
- |
46,298 |
|||||||||
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities |
|
|
(31,024) |
|
|
|
11,817 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(10,883) |
|
|
(6,649) |
||||
Net proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
5,493 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|||
|
|
||||||||||
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(5,390) |
|
|
(6,557) |
|||||
|
|
||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Senior Credit Facility: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Borrowings |
|
|
- |
|
|
720,333 |
|||||
Repayments |
|
|
(4,270) |
|
|
(678,037) |
|||||
DIP Credit Agreement: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Borrowings |
|
|
426,120 |
|
|
130,000 |
|||||
Repayments |
(379,000) |
(50,000) |
|||||||||
Fees associated with DIP Credit Agreement |
- |
(5,150) |
|||||||||
Trade Receivables Program |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(123,502) |
||||
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities |
|
42,850 |
|
(6,356) |
|
||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
6,436 |
(1,096) |
|||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
3,660 |
1,096 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
10,096 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|||
See accompanying notes.
5
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Common |
Par |
Treasury Stock |
Accumulated |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Unearned |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Shares |
Value |
Shares |
|
Amount |
Deficit |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Compensation |
|
Total |
||||||||||||||||||
Balance, January 1, 2004 |
|
71,100 |
|
$ |
404,399 |
|
|
(21,202 |
) |
|
$ |
(416,133 |
) |
$ |
(827,042 |
) |
|
$ |
(110,359) |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(949,135) |
||||||||
|
Comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Net loss |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
(38,873 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(38,873) |
||||
|
|
Foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Cash flow hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Net derivative losses, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,156) |
|||||
Net operating loss benefit |
53,567 |
53,567 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2004 |
|
71,100 |
|
$ |
457,966 |
|
|
(21,202 |
) |
|
$ |
(416,133 |
) |
$ |
(865,915 |
) |
|
$ |
(122,642) |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(946,724) |
||||||||
See accompanying notes.
6
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the six month period ended June 30, 2004, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2004. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the annual report on Form 10-K for WestP oint Stevens Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Certain amounts in the prior year financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
2. Chapter 11 Filing
On June 1, 2003 (the "Petition Date"), the Company and several of its subsidiaries (together with the Company, the "Debtors") each commenced a voluntary case under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court. The Debtors are authorized to operate their businesses and manage their properties as debtors in possession pursuant to section 1107(a) and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. A brief chronology of the circumstances that led to such filing is set forth below.
7
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
2. Chapter 11 Filing--Continued
On or about the Petition Date, the Company announced that it had reached an agreement in principle with the holders of approximately 52% of the aggregate principal amount of its Senior Notes on the terms of a financial restructuring to be implemented through the chapter 11 process. The agreement in principle was subject to numerous conditions and further agreements, including the entry of an order confirming the plan of reorganization contemplated by the proposal as required by the Bankruptcy Code. On October 17, 2003, the Company announced that it had determined not to implement the previously announced agreement in principle. Instead, the Company intends to negotiate new terms for a chapter 11 plan of reorganization with all of its major creditor constituencies.
On June 2, 2003, the Bankruptcy Court entered a number of orders enabling the Company to continue regular operations throughout the reorganization proceeding. These orders authorized, among other things, normal payment of employee salaries, wages and benefits; continued participation in workers' compensation insurance programs; payment to vendors for post-petition delivery of goods and services; payment of certain pre-petition obligations to customers; and continued payment of utilities. The Bankruptcy Court also approved, under interim order, access to $175 million in debtor in possession financing and subsequently approved, under final order, access to $300 million of debtor in possession financing for use by the Company, pursuant to a Post-Petition Credit Agreement, dated as of June 2, 2003, among WestPoint Stevens Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries, the financi al institutions named therein and Bank of America, N.A. and Wachovia Bank, National Association (the "DIP Credit Agreement").
The DIP Credit Agreement consists of revolving credit loans of up to $300 million (with a sublimit of $75 million for letters of credit) with an initial term of one year and an initial maturity date of June 2, 2004. At its option, the Company may extend the term for up to two successive periods of six months each. On April 28, 2004 the Company exercised its first option to extend the DIP Credit Agreement for an additional six month period, revising the maturity date to December 2, 2004.
Initial advances under the DIP Credit Agreement bore interest at a fluctuating rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus a margin of 2.75% or, at the Company's option, prime plus a margin of 0.75%. Each margin is subject to quarterly adjustments, commencing November 1, 2003, pursuant to a pricing matrix, based on average availability, having a range of 2.25% to 3.00% for LIBOR based loans and 0.25% to 1.00% for prime-based loans. The DIP Credit Agreement also has an unused line fee of 0.625% per annum, subject to quarterly adjustments as above having a range of 0.375% to 0.75%. Effective November 1, 2003, as a result of average availability, interest rates under the DIP Credit Agreement decreased to LIBOR plus 2.50% or, at the Company's option, prime plus 0.50% and the unused line fee decreased to 0.50%. Effective February 1, 2004, as a result of average availability, interest rates under the DIP Credit Agreement increased to LIBOR plus 2.75% or, at the Company's option, prime plus 0.75% and the unused line fee increased to 0.625%.
8
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
2. Chapter 11 Filing--Continued
The DIP Credit Agreement contains a number of covenants, including among others, affirmative and negative covenants with respect to certain financial tests and other indebtedness, as well as restrictions against the declaration or payment of dividends, the making of certain intercompany advances and the disposition of assets without consent. The DIP Credit Agreement also contains Events of Default (as defined in the DIP Credit Agreement) including among others, a failure to pay the principal and interest of the obligations when due, default with respect to any Debt (as defined in the DIP Credit Agreement) and a failure by the Company to comply with any provisions of the Financing Orders (as defined in the DIP Credit Agreement).
During the third quarter of 2003, the Company's DIP Credit Agreement was amended primarily to modify the minimum EBITDA covenant, add a minimum availability covenant, permit certain restructuring, impairment and other charges and modify other miscellaneous provisions. During the second quarter of 2004, the Company's DIP Credit Agreement was further amended to clarify certain asset sale provisions, and during the third quarter of 2004, the DIP Credit Agreement was amended primarily to modify the minimum EBITDA and minimum availability covenants. At June 30, 2004, the Company was in compliance with its covenants under the DIP Credit Agreement.
There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be able to continue to comply with the debt covenants or that, if it fails to do so, it will be able to obtain amendments to or waivers of such covenants. Failure of the Company to comply with covenants contained in its DIP Credit Agreement, if not waived, or to adequately service debt obligations, could result in a default under the DIP Credit Agreement. Any default under the Company's DIP Credit Agreement, particularly any default that results in acceleration of indebtedness or foreclosure on collateral, could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
The Debtors are currently operating their businesses as debtors in possession pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code. Pre-bankruptcy obligations of the Debtors, including obligations under debt instruments, generally may not be enforced against the Debtors, and any actions to collect such indebtedness are automatically stayed, unless relief from the automatic stay is granted by the Bankruptcy Court. The rights of and ultimate payments by the Company under pre-bankruptcy obligations may be substantially altered. This could result in claims being liquidated in the chapter 11 case at less (and possibly substantially less) than 100% of their face value. The Debtors cannot presently determine or reasonably estimate the ultimate liability that may result from rejecting contracts or leases or from the filing of claims for any rejected contracts or leases, and no provisions have yet been made for these items. The amount of the claims to be filed by the creditors could be significant ly different than the amount of the liabilities recorded by the Company.
Since the Petition Date, the Debtors have conducted business in the ordinary course. Management is in the process of stabilizing the business of the Debtors and evaluating their operations as part of the
9
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
2. Chapter 11 Filing--Continued
development of a chapter 11 plan of reorganization. The Debtors intend to seek the requisite acceptance of the plan of reorganization by security holders and confirmation of the plan by the Bankruptcy Court, all in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. During the pendency of the chapter 11 case, the Debtors may, with Bankruptcy Court approval, sell assets and settle liabilities, including for amounts other than those reflected in the financial statements. The administrative and reorganization expenses resulting from the chapter 11 case will unfavorably affect the Debtors' results of operations. Future results of operations may also be adversely affected by other factors related to the chapter 11 case.
On August 28, 2003, one of the Company's foreign subsidiaries, WestPoint Stevens (Europe) Ltd., commenced an insolvency proceeding in the United Kingdom and is in the process of being liquidated. The losses associated with the closure of the foreign subsidiary are estimated to total approximately $5.3 million consisting of inventory writedowns of $3.9 million and accounts receivable writedowns for claims of $1.4 million. These charges are reflected in restructuring, impairment and other charges as discussed in Note 5.
Basis of Presentation
The Company's consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States applicable on a going concern basis. Except as otherwise disclosed, these principles assume that assets will be realized and liabilities will be discharged in the ordinary course of business. The Company is currently operating as a debtor in possession under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, and its continuation as a going concern is contingent upon, among other things, confirmation by the Bankruptcy Court of a chapter 11 plan of reorganization and its ability to comply with the DIP Credit Agreement, return to profitability, generate sufficient cash flows from operations and obtain financing sources to meet future obligations. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to achieve any of these results. The Company's consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments rela ting to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.
The Company's consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report are presented in accordance with AICPA Statement of Position 90-7 ("Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code") ("SOP 90-7"). In the chapter 11 case, substantially all unsecured liabilities as of the Petition Date are subject to compromise or other treatment under a plan of reorganization which must be confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court after submission to any required vote by affected parties. For financial reporting purposes, the categories of liabilities and obligations whose treatment and satisfaction are dependent on the outcome of the chapter 11 case and classified as Liabilities Subject to Compromise in the consolidated balance sheets under SOP 90-7 are identified below (in thousands):
10
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
2. Chapter 11 Filing--Continued
Basis of Presentation--Continued
June 30, |
December 31, |
||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||
Senior Notes due 2005 and 2008: |
|
||||||||||
Senior Notes outstanding |
$1,000,000 |
$1,000,000 |
|||||||||
Related accrued interest |
36,130 |
36,130 |
|||||||||
Related deferred financing fees (less accumulated |
|||||||||||
amortization of $15,311 and $14,052, respectively) |
(5,905) |
(7,164) |
|||||||||
Total |
1,030,225 |
1,028,966 |
|||||||||
Accounts payable |
30,143 |
30,700 |
|||||||||
Pension liabilities |
8,394 |
8,394 |
|||||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
18,688 |
18,809 |
|||||||||
Total |
$1,087,450 |
$1,086,869 |
|||||||||
The ultimate amount of and settlement terms for the Company's pre-bankruptcy liabilities are subject to the ultimate outcome of its chapter 11 case and, accordingly, are not presently determinable. Pursuant to SOP 90-7, professional fees associated with the chapter 11 case are expensed as incurred and reported as reorganization costs (chapter 11 expenses). Also, interest expense is reported only to the extent that it is paid during the pendency of the chapter 11 case or that it is probable that it will be an allowed claim. During the first six months of 2004, the Company recognized charges of $16.5 million for chapter 11 expenses, consisting of $0.2 million in severance associated with the resignation of the Company's former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, $5.3 million for performance bonuses under a court approved Key Employee Retention Program, $2.3 million related to the amortization of fees associated with the DIP Credit Agreement and $8.7 million related to fees payable to professionals retained to assist with the chapter 11 case. During the first six months of 2003, the Company recognized charges of $6.2 million for chapter 11 expenses, consisting of $4.9 million related to the early termination of the Company's Trade Receivables Program, $0.4 million related to the amortization of fees associated with the DIP Credit Agreement and $0.9 million related to fees payable to professionals retained to assist with the chapter 11 case. During all of 2003, the Company recognized charges of $31.5 million for chapter 11 expenses, consisting of $4.9 million related to the early termination of the Company's Trade Receivables Program, $1.3 million in severance associated with the resignation of the Company's former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, $7.6 million for performance bonuses under a court approved Key Employee Retention Program, $3.6 million related to the amortization of fees associated with the DIP Credit Agreement and $14.1 million re lated to fees payable to professionals retained to assist with the chapter 11 case.
Assets of the Company's subsidiaries currently excluded from the bankruptcy case total $8.8 million and $9.8 million as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, or 0.7% and 0.8% of the Company's
11
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
2. Chapter 11 Filing--Continued
consolidated assets, respectively. Revenues of the subsidiaries totaled $5.0 million and $10.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, or 1.3%, respectively, of the Company's consolidated revenues, and revenues of the subsidiaries totaled $7.9 million and $15.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, or 2.2% and 2.1%, respectively, of the Company's consolidated revenues.
3. Inventories
The Company uses the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method of accounting for substantially all inventories for financial reporting purposes. Interim determinations of LIFO inventories are necessarily based on management's estimates of year-end inventory levels and costs. Subsequent changes in these estimates, including the final year-end LIFO determination, and the effect of such changes on earnings are recorded in the interim periods in which they occur.
Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
||||
Finished goods |
|
$ |
175,699 |
|
|
$ |
144,613 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
185,815 |
|
|
|
176,062 |
|
Raw materials and supplies |
|
|
55,777 |
|
|
|
47,945 |
|
LIFO reserve |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
$ |
417,291 |
|
|
$ |
368,620 |
|
Indebtedness is as follows (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
||||
Short-term indebtedness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Credit Facility |
$ |
486,419 |
|
|
$ |
490,689 |
|
|
Second-Lien Facility |
|
165,000 |
|
|
|
165,000 |
|
DIP Credit Agreement |
136,137 |
89,017 |
||||||
|
$ |
787,556 |
|
|
$ |
744,706 |
|
|
Short-term indebtedness classified as liabilities |
||||||||
7-7/8% Senior Notes due 2005 |
$ |
525,000 |
$ |
525,000 |
||||
7-7/8% Senior Notes due 2008 |
475,000 |
475,000 |
||||||
$ |
1,000,000 |
$ |
1,000,000 |
|||||
12
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
4. Indebtedness and Financial Arrangements--Continued
The DIP Credit Agreement consists of revolving credit loans of up to $300 million (with a sublimit of $75 million for letters of credit) with an initial term of one year and an initial maturity date of June 2, 2004. At its option, the Company may extend the term for up to two successive periods of six months each. On April 28, 2004 the Company exercised its first option to extend the DIP Credit Agreement for an additional six month period, revising the maturity date to December 2, 2004. At June 30, 2004, borrowing availability under the DIP Credit Agreement was $119.9 million and consisted of a calculated borrowing base of $307.5 million (limited to the maximum commitment of $300 million) less outstanding loans of $136.1 million, outstanding letters of credit of $39.0 million and other reserves of $5.0 million. (See Note 2 where the DIP Credit Agreement is discussed further.)
During the third quarter of 2003, the Company's DIP Credit Agreement was amended primarily to modify the minimum EBITDA covenant, add a minimum availability covenant, permit certain restructuring, impairment and other charges and modify other miscellaneous provisions. During the second quarter of 2004, the Company's DIP Credit Agreement was further amended to clarify certain asset sale provisions, and during the third quarter of 2004, the DIP Credit Agreement was amended primarily to modify the minimum EBITDA and minimum availability covenants to permit certain inventory reduction plans. At June 30, 2004, the Company was in compliance with its covenants under the DIP Credit Agreement.
At June 30, 2004, the Company's Senior Credit Facility with certain lenders (collectively, the "Banks") consisted of a $595.4 million revolving credit facility ("Revolver") subject to interim facility limitations, with a Revolver maturity date of November 30, 2004. Effective with the chapter 11 filing, additional borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility are no longer available to the Company. On February 1, 2004, the revolver commitment decreased $17.5 million as a result of a scheduled commitment reduction. During the first six months of 2004, the revolver commitment and outstanding loans decreased $4.2 million as a result of certain proceeds from asset dispositions, which were used to reduce the loan balance. Under the Senior Credit Facility, there was approximately $0.1 million of outstanding letters of credit at June 30, 2004.
Effective March 31, 2003, the Senior Credit Facility was amended primarily to provide for an interim facility limitation and to add an unused commitment fee. At the option of the Company and effective with the March 31, 2003 amendment to the Senior Credit Facility, interest under the Senior Credit Facility was payable monthly, either at the prime rate plus 5.25% or LIBOR plus 7.00%, compared to prime rate plus 2.75%, or LIBOR plus 4.50% in effect at December 31, 2002. Prior to the chapter 11 filing, the Company was obligated to pay a facility fee in an amount equal to 0.50% of each Bank's commitment under the Revolver, and an unused commitment fee in an amount equal to 1.00% of the difference between the revolver commitment and the daily outstanding loans and letters of credit. Effective with the chapter 11 filing, the Company is no longer obligated to pay a facility fee or an unused commitment fee for the Senior Credit Facility. The loans under the Senior Credit Facility are secured by the pledge of all the stock of the Company's material subsidiaries and a first priority lien on substantially all of the assets of the Company.
13
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
4. Indebtedness and Financial Arrangements--Continued
The Company has a $165.0 million Second-Lien Senior Credit Facility ("Second-Lien Facility") with a maturity date of February 28, 2005. Effective with the Company's chapter 11 filing, interest under the Second-Lien Facility is payable monthly, as opposed to quarterly prior to the filing, at an interest rate of prime plus 8% increasing each quarter after June 30, 2002, by .375% but in no event less than 15%. Loans under the Second-Lien Facility are secured by a second priority lien on the assets securing the existing Senior Credit Facility.
The 7-7/8% Senior Notes due 2005 and 7-7/8% Senior Notes due 2008 (together, the "Senior Notes") are general unsecured obligations of the Company and rank pari passu in right of payment with all existing or future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of the Company and senior in right of payment to all subordinated indebtedness of the Company. The Senior Notes bear interest at the rate of 7-7/8% per annum, and prior to the Company's chapter 11 filing were payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15 of each year. Effective with the Company's chapter 11 filing, interest on the Senior Notes is no longer paid or accrued. The Senior Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time at the option of the Company at 100% of the principal amount thereof plus the Make-Whole Premium (as defined) plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase. In addition, in the event of a Change of Control (as defined), the Company will be required to make an offer to purchase the notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase. Neither the redemption option nor the Change of Control provisions are relevant in the Company's chapter 11 case.
The Company's credit agreements contain a number of customary covenants including, among others, restrictions on the incurrence of indebtedness, transactions with affiliates, and certain asset dispositions as well as limitations on restricted debt and equity payments and capital expenditures. Certain provisions require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios, a minimum interest coverage ratio, a minimum debt to EBITDA ratio, a minimum EBITDA, a minimum consolidated net worth (as defined) and a minimum availability. The Company can no longer make restricted debt and equity payments. At June 30, 2004, the Company was in compliance with its covenants under the DIP Credit Agreement but was not in compliance with the covenants under its various other credit agreements, primarily as a result of the chapter 11 filing and failure to meet certain financial covenants.
At March 31, 2003, and prior to the petition date, the Company was not in compliance with certain of its covenants under the Senior Credit Facility and Second-Lien Facility during which time the Company engaged in active discussions with its senior lenders to obtain an amendment or waiver of such non-compliance (See Note 2 where the chronology of the circumstances causing the Company to file voluntary petitions for reorganization under chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code is discussed).
14
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
5. Restructuring, Impairment and Other Charges
In 2000, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved the new Eight-Point Plan, which was created to be the guiding discipline for the Company in a global economy. The Board also approved a pretax charge for restructuring, impairment and other charges to cover the initial cost of implementing the Eight-Point Plan that is designed to streamline operations and improve profitability. The Eight-Point Plan addresses the following points: 1) expand brands; 2) explore new licensing opportunities; 3) rationalize manufacturing; 4) reduce overhead; 5) increase global sourcing; 6) improve inventory utilization; 7) enhance supply chain and logistics; and 8) improve capital structure.
On September 20, 2002, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved additional restructuring initiatives to increase asset utilization, lower manufacturing costs and increase cash flow and profitability through reallocation of production assets from bath products to basic bedding products and through rationalization of its retail stores division. The Company initially expected the restructuring initiatives to result in a $36.5 million pretax charge for restructuring, impairment and other charges, with approximately $20 million of the pretax charge expected to be non-cash items. As a result of additions to the initial restructuring initiatives related to the closure of its Rosemary (NC) towel fabrication and distribution facilities and its WestPoint Stevens (Europe) Ltd. foreign subsidiary, the Company's restructuring initiatives resulted in a $47.7 million pretax charge for restructuring, impairment and other charges, with approximately $31.7 million of the pretax charge being non-cash items. All charges were recorded in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. The restructuring charge approved in 2002 was completed in the second quarter of 2004.
As a result of the restructuring initiatives begun in 2002, the Company announced the closure of its Rosemary (NC) towel finishing facility, the conversion of its Rosemary (NC) towel fabrication and distribution facilities to basic bedding facilities and the closure of its Dalton (GA) utility bedding facility. The Company announced on April 25, 2003 that the Rosemary (NC) towel fabrication and distribution facilities that were previously disclosed as being converted to basic bedding facilities would now be closed. The Company also announced the closure of twenty-two retail stores and the closure of its WestPoint Stevens (Europe) Ltd. foreign subsidiary.
The cost of the manufacturing and retail store rationalization and certain overhead reduction costs were reflected in a restructuring and impairment charge of $6.6 million, before taxes, in 2002, a restructuring and impairment charge of $12.6 million, before taxes, in 2003 and a restructuring and impairment charge of $0.4 million, before taxes, in the first six months of 2004. The components of the restructuring and impairment charge in 2002 included $4.4 million for the impairment of fixed assets and $2.2 million in reserves to cover cash expenses related primarily to severance benefits. The components of the restructuring and impairment charge in 2003 included $7.0 million for the impairment of fixed assets and $5.6 million in reserves to cover cash expenses related to severance benefits of $5.2 million and other exit costs. The components of the restructuring and impairment charge in the first six months of 2004 included $0.4 million in reserves to cover cash expenses related to severance benefits.
15
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
5. Restructuring, Impairment and Other Charges--Continued
During 2002, 2003 and 2004 as a result of restructuring initiatives approved in 2002, the Company has terminated and agreed to pay severance (including continuing termination benefits) to approximately 500 employees.
The following is a summary of the restructuring and impairment activity in the related reserves (in millions):
Employee |
Other |
||||||||||||
Writedown |
Termination |
Exit |
Total |
||||||||||
Assets |
Benefits |
Costs |
Charge |
||||||||||
2002 Restructuring and Impairment Charge: |
|||||||||||||
Third Quarter |
$ |
4.3 |
$ |
1.6 |
$ |
- |
$ |
5.9 |
|||||
Fourth Quarter |
0.1 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
0.7 |
|||||||||
Total 2002 Charge |
4.4 |
2.1 |
0.1 |
6.6 |
|||||||||
2003 Restructuring and Impairment Charge: |
|||||||||||||
First Quarter |
0.2 |
0.8 |
0.4 |
1.4 |
|||||||||
Second Quarter |
6.8 |
4.3 |
0.8 |
11.9 |
|||||||||
Third Quarter |
0.8 |
0.2 |
- |
1.0 |
|||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
(0.8) |
(0.1) |
(0.8) |
(1.7) |
|||||||||
Total 2003 Charge |
7.0 |
5.2 |
0.4 |
12.6 |
|||||||||
2004 Restructuring and Impairment Charge: |
|||||||||||||
First Quarter |
- |
0.2 |
- |
0.2 |
|||||||||
Second Quarter |
- |
0.2 |
- |
0.2 |
|||||||||
Total 2004 Charge |
- |
0.4 |
- |
0.4 |
|||||||||
Writedown Assets to Net Recoverable Value |
(11.4) |
- |
- |
(11.4) |
|||||||||
2002 Cash Payments |
- |
(1.5) |
- |
(1.5) |
|||||||||
2003 Cash Payments |
- |
(4.6) |
(0.4) |
(5.0) |
|||||||||
2004 Cash Payments |
- |
(1.0) |
- |
(1.0) |
|||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2004 |
$ |
- |
$ |
0.6 |
$ |
0.1 |
$ |
0.7 |
|||||
During 2002, other costs of the restructuring initiatives of $11.6 million, before taxes, were recognized consisting of inventory writedowns of $10.5 million primarily related to the rationalization of its retail stores division and other expenses of $1.1 million, consisting primarily of related unabsorbed overhead, all reflected in cost of goods sold. During 2003, other costs of the restructuring initiatives of $16.0 million, before taxes, were recognized consisting of inventory writedowns of $8.4 million primarily related to the closure of its foreign subsidiary and the rationalization of its retail stores division, accounts receivable writedowns for claims of $1.4 million related to the closure of its foreign subsidiary and other expenses of $6.2 million, consisting primarily of $4.1 million of related unabsorbed overhead, $1.2 million for the relocation of machinery and other expenses of $0.9 million, all reflected in cost of goods sold. During the first six month s of 2004, other costs of the restructuring initiatives of $0.4 million, before taxes, were recognized for relocation of machinery, all reflected in cost of goods sold.
16
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
5. Restructuring, Impairment and Other Charges--Continued
During the third quarter of 2003, the Company's Board of Directors approved further additional restructuring initiatives to increase asset utilization, lower manufacturing costs and increase cash flow and profitability through a further realignment of manufacturing capacity. Costs of restructuring initiatives may result in restructuring, impairment and other pretax charges of up to $84.3 million, of which up to $55.6 million of the pretax charge may relate to non-cash items. The charges for the restructuring initiatives began in the fourth quarter of 2003 and will continue throughout 2004 in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.
As a result of the restructuring initiatives begun in 2003, the Company announced the closure of its Dunson (GA) sheeting facility, its Dixie (GA) towel facility, its Coushatta (LA) utility bedding facility and its Fairfax (AL) towel greige facility. The Company also announced the conversion of its Lanier (AL) sheeting facility to towel production and the conversion of its Greenville (AL) blanket facility to a utility bedding facility. The Company is in process of determining any remaining facilities that may be affected by its ongoing reorganization efforts. These plant closings and conversions will provide the Company with greater production efficiency and better-aligned capacity to compete more effectively in a global economy.
The cost of the manufacturing rationalization was reflected in a restructuring and impairment charge of $37.0 million, before taxes, in 2003 and a restructuring and impairment charge of $7.9 million, before taxes, in the first six months of 2004. The restructuring and impairment charge in 2003 reflected the impairment of fixed assets. The components of the restructuring and impairment charge in the first six months of 2004 included $1.8 million for the impairment of fixed assets and $6.1 million in reserves to cover cash expenses related to severance benefits.
During 2004 as a result of restructuring initiatives approved in 2003, the Company has terminated and agreed to pay severance (including continuing termination benefits) to approximately 650 employees.
17
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
5. Restructuring, Impairment and Other Charges--Continued
The following is a summary of the restructuring and impairment activity in the related reserves (in millions):
Employee |
Other |
||||||||||||
Writedown |
Termination |
Exit |
Total |
||||||||||
Assets |
Benefits |
Costs |
Charge |
||||||||||
2003 Restructuring and Impairment Charge: |
|||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ |
37.0 |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
37.0 |
|||||
2004 Restructuring and Impairment Charge: |
|||||||||||||
First Quarter |
- |
4.6 |
- |
4.6 |
|||||||||
Second Quarter |
1.8 |
1.5 |
- |
3.3 |
|||||||||
Total 2004 Charge |
1.8 |
6.1 |
- |
7.9 |
|||||||||
Writedown Assets to Net Recoverable Value |
(38.8) |
- |
- |
(38.8) |
|||||||||
2004 Cash Payments |
- |
(2.7) |
- |
(2.7) |
|||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2004 |
$ |
- |
$ |
3.4 |
$ |
- |
$ |
3.4 |
|||||
During 2003, other costs of the restructuring initiatives of $1.4 million, before taxes, were recognized consisting of inventory writedowns of $1.0 million and other expenses of $0.4 million, consisting of related unabsorbed overhead, all reflected in cost of goods sold. During the first six months of 2004, other costs of the restructuring initiatives of $8.1 million, before taxes, were recognized consisting primarily of $6.9 million of related unabsorbed overhead and $1.2 million for the relocation of machinery, all reflected in cost of goods sold.
6. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
|||||||
June 30, |
June 30, |
|||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||
Net loss |
$(23,994) |
$(72,047) |
$(38,873) |
$(88,953) |
||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(116) |
(1,694) |
(171) |
(918) |
||||
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net of tax: |
||||||||
Net changes in fair value of derivatives |
(6,504) |
(494) |
(15,051) |
152 |
||||
Net (gains) losses reclassified from other |
|
|
|
|
||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$(28,638) |
$(75,117) |
$(51,156) |
$(92,421) |
||||
18
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
7. Deferred Financing Fees
Amendment fees and transaction fees related to the Company's various credit agreements are capitalized in the period incurred and amortized over the remaining term of the facility. Included in Other expense-net in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, is the amortization of deferred financing fees of $3.3 million and $6.5 million, respectively, compared with $3.2 million and $5.8 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, related to the Company's credit facilities other than the DIP Credit Agreement. Deferred financing fees related to the DIP Credit Agreement are included in chapter 11 expenses and totaled $1.0 million and $2.3 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004.
Pension Plans
The Company has defined benefit pension plans covering essentially all employees. Benefits are based on years of service and compensation, and the Company's practice is to fund amounts that are required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The Company uses December 31 as the measurement date of its defined benefit pension plans.
The following table sets forth data for the Company's pension plans (in thousands of dollars):
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
|||||||||||||
June 30, |
June 30, |
|||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||
Components of net periodic pension |
||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ |
2,328 |
$ |
2,117 |
$ |
4,657 |
$ |
4,233 |
||||||
Interest cost |
5,807 |
5,926 |
11,613 |
11,853 |
||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(5,400) |
(5,162) |
(10,800) |
(10,323) |
||||||||||
Net amortization |
2,695 |
2,620 |
5,391 |
5,240 |
||||||||||
Net periodic pension expense |
$ |
5,430 |
$ |
5,501 |
$ |
10,861 |
$ |
11,003 |
||||||
Based on actuarial information available at December 31, 2003, the Company estimates that contributions to its pension plans in 2004 will total approximately $24.9 million, reflecting both quarterly and annually required contributions.
19
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
8. Employee Benefit Plans--Continued
Other Post-Retirement Benefit Plans
In addition to sponsoring defined benefit pension plans, the Company sponsors various post-retirement plans that provide health care and life insurance benefits to certain current and future retirees. All such post-retirement benefit plans are unfunded. The Company uses December 31 as the measurement date of its post-retirement plans.
Net periodic post-retirement benefit plans expense is not material during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003.
9. Income Taxes
The Company has federal and state net operating loss carryovers ("NOL's"), a portion of which was generated prior to an ownership change that took place in 1992. Because of the complex tax rules related to these carryforwards and the uncertainty of ultimately realizing benefit from the losses, the Company did not previously record full benefit for these NOL's for financial statement purposes.
During the second quarter of 2004, certain contingencies related to the NOL's were resolved and the Company reevaluated its position on the tax benefits associated with these carryforwards. As a result of this analysis, the Company recorded a $53.6 million financial statement benefit in the second quarter of 2004. The benefit was recorded in equity (rather than in the income statement) because the NOL's involved were generated prior to emergence from the Company's previous bankruptcy. This treatment is in accordance with the accounting rules of Statement of Position 90-7 (Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code).
During the second quarter of 2004, certain events occurred that led the Company to conclude that certain tax contingency reserves were no longer needed. As a result of these discrete events, tax contingency reserves totaling approximately $23.7 million were reversed in the quarter and recorded as a tax benefit in the accompanying statement of operations.
The Company also recorded a valuation allowance of approximately $24.7 million during the second quarter of 2004. The Company continued to evaluate all positive and negative evidence associated with its deferred tax assets and concluded that a valuation allowance should be established such that total net deferred tax assets are recorded at zero. As part of this process, the Company concluded that it was not appropriate to rely on future taxable income as a source of evidence to realize certain net operating losses given the uncertainity of the Company's current financial condition.
20
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
10. Litigation and Contingent Liabilities
Except as stated below, as of the Petition Date, the following actions in which the Company is a defendant have been enjoined from further proceedings pursuant to section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code. To the extent parties have filed timely proofs of claim, the Bankruptcy Court will determine the amount of their pre-bankruptcy claims against the Company. In certain instances, the Bankruptcy Court may permit actions to proceed to judgment for the purpose of determining the amount of the pre-bankruptcy claim against the Company. Lawsuits based on facts arising solely after the commencement of the Company's chapter 11 case are not stayed by section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code.
On October 5, 2001, a purported stockholder class action suit, entitled Norman Geller v. WestPoint Stevens Inc., et al. (the "Geller action"), was filed against the Company and certain of its former officers and directors in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. (A subsequent and functionally identical complaint was also filed.) The actions were consolidated by Order dated January 25, 2002. Plaintiffs served a Consolidated Amended Complaint (the "Amended Complaint") on March 29, 2002. The Amended Complaint asserts claims against all Defendants under section 10(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder and against the Company and Defendant Holcombe T. Green, Jr. as "controlling persons" under section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The Amended Complaint alleges that, during the putative class period (i.e., February 10, 1999, to October 10, 2000), the Company and certa in of its officers and directors caused false and misleading statements to be issued regarding, inter alia, alleged overcapacity and excessive inventories of the Company's towel-related products and customer demand for such products and that certain Individual Defendants wrongfully sold or pledged Company stock at inflated prices for their benefit. The Amended Complaint refers to the Company's press releases and quarterly and annual reports on Securities Exchange Commission Forms 10-Q and 10-K, which discuss the Company's results and forecasts for the fiscal years 1999 and 2000. Plaintiffs allege that these press releases and public filings were false and misleading because they failed to disclose that the Company allegedly "knew sales would be adversely affected in future quarters and years." Plaintiffs also allege in general terms that the Company materially overstated revenues by making premature shipments of products.
On June 6, 2002, Defendants filed Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint. On February 3, 2003, the court denied Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. The Company has been informed by counsel that its insurance carrier has reached an agreement in principle to settle the Geller action at no cost to the Company, subject to definitive documentation and approvals of the court and the Bankruptcy Court.
In the opinion of management, settlement of the previously disclosed shareholder actions under existing insurance coverage is probable. As a result of the settlement in principle (subject to court approval) of the Geller case, during the second quarter of 2004, the Company recorded a liability of $4,250,000 for its legal obligation to fund the settlement and a related receivable of $4,250,000 for the reimbursement from its insurance carrier.
21
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
10. Litigation and Contingent Liabilities--Continued
On March 11, 2002, a shareholder derivative action, entitled Gordon Clark v. Holcombe T. Green, Jr., et al. (the "Clark action"), was filed against certain of the Company's former directors and officers in the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia. The Complaint alleges that the named individuals breached their fiduciary duties by acting in bad faith and wasting corporate assets. The Complaint also asserts claims under Georgia Code Ann. sections14-2-740 to 14-2-747 and 14-2-831. The claims are based on the same or similar facts as are alleged in the Geller action.
On July 1, 2002, a shareholder derivative action, entitled John Hemmer v. Holcombe T. Green, Jr., et al. (the "Hemmer action"), was filed against Mr. Green and certain of the Company's other current and former directors including Messrs. Hugh M. Chapman, John F. Sorte and Ms. M. Katherine Dwyer in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County. The Complaint alleges that the named individuals breached their fiduciary duties and knowingly or recklessly failed to exercise oversight responsibilities to ensure the integrity of the Company's financial reporting. The Complaint also asserts that certain of the named individuals used proprietary Company information in selling or pledging Company stock at inflated prices for their benefit. The claims are based on the same or similar facts as are alleged in the Geller action.
By agreements between the parties, the Clark and Hemmer actions were both stayed pending entry of final judgment by the court in the Geller action. As with the Geller action, the Clark and Hemmer actions were also stayed due to the Company's bankruptcy filing.
The Clark action has been voluntarily dismissed. The Company has been informed by counsel that they expect the Hemmer action to be dismissed.
On March 21, 2002, an Adversary Complaint of Debtors and Debtors in Possession Against WestPoint Stevens Inc. was filed by Pillowtex, Inc., a Delaware corporation, et al., and Pillowtex Corporation, et al., against the Company in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. Pillowtex Corporation and its related and affiliated companies ("Pillowtex") as Debtors and Debtors in Possession allege breach of a postpetition contract (the "Sale Agreement") dated January 31, 2001, among Pillowtex, Ralph Lauren Home Collection, Inc. ("RLH") and Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation ("PRLC") collectively referred to as "Ralph Lauren" and the Company. Pillowtex alleges that the Company refused to perform its purchase obligation under the Sales Agreement and is liable to it for $4,800,000 plus potentially significant other consequential damages. The Company believes that the complaint is without merit and intends to contest the action vigorousl y. The case is currently stayed due to the Company's bankruptcy filing.
22
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
10. Litigation and Contingent Liabilities--Continued
The Company is subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations governing, among other things, the discharge, storage, handling and disposal of a variety of hazardous and nonhazardous substances and wastes used in or resulting from its operations and potential remediation obligations thereunder. Certain of the Company's facilities (including certain facilities no longer owned or utilized by the Company) have been cited or are being investigated with respect to alleged violations of such laws and regulations. The Company is cooperating fully with relevant parties and authorities in all such matters. The Company believes that it has adequately provided in its financial statements for any expenses and liabilities that may result from such matters. The Company also is insured with respect to certain of such matters. The Company's operations are governed by laws and regulations relating to employee safety a nd health which, among other things, establish exposure limitations for cotton dust, formaldehyde, asbestos and noise, and regulate chemical and ergonomic hazards in the workplace.
Although the Company does not expect that compliance with any of such laws and regulations will adversely affect the Company's operations, there can be no assurance such regulatory requirements will not become more stringent in the future or that the Company will not incur significant costs in the future to comply with such requirements.
The Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various other legal proceedings, both as plaintiff and as defendant, which are normal to its business. It is the opinion of management that the aforementioned actions and claims, if determined adversely to the Company, will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or operations of the Company taken as a whole.
23
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
11. Stock Options
At June 30, 2004, the Company had several stock-based compensation plans, which are described in Note 7 -- Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2003. In accordance with SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation -- Transition and Disclosure, the Company continues to apply the intrinsic value method of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees in accounting for its plans. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for its stock incentive plan. Had compensation cost for the Company's stock-based compensation plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under those plans consistent with the method as amended by SFAS No. 148, the Company's net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per common share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below (in thousands, except per share data):
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
|||||||
June 30, |
June 30, |
|||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||
Net loss as reported |
$(23,994) |
$(72,047) |
$(38,873) |
$(88,953) |
||||
Total stock-based compension expenses |
|
|
|
|
||||
Pro forma net loss |
$(24,675) |
$(72,841) |
$(40,257) |
$(90,397) |
||||
Basic and diluted loss per common share: |
||||||||
As reported |
$(.48) |
$(1.44) |
$(.78) |
$(1.78) |
||||
Pro forma |
$(.49) |
$(1.46) |
$(.81) |
$(1.81) |
The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.
24
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
12. New Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") released Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities ("FIN 46"). FIN 46 requires that all primary beneficiaries of Variable Interest Entities ("VIE") consolidate that entity. FIN 46 was effective immediately for VIEs created after January 31, 2003, and to VIEs to which an enterprise obtained an interest after that date. It applied in the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003, to VIEs in which an enterprise held a variable interest it acquired before February 1, 2003. In December 2003, the FASB published a revision to FIN 46 ("FIN 46R") to clarify some of the provisions of the interpretation and to defer the effective date of implementation for certain entities. Under the guidance of FIN 46R, entities that did not have interests in structures that are commonly referred to as special purpose entities were r equired to apply the provisions of the interpretation in financial statements for periods ending after March 14, 2004. The Company has not identified any interests in special purpose entities applicable to the provisions of this statement in applying the provisions of FIN 46R to its financial statements.
25
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
Chapter 11 Case
As disclosed in Note 2, on June 1, 2003, the Company and several of its subsidiaries each commenced with the Bankruptcy Court a voluntary case under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Bankruptcy Code prevents creditors and other parties in interest from taking certain actions, including enforcement actions, against the Debtors, without first obtaining prior approval of the Bankruptcy Court. In addition, the Company has entered into the DIP Credit Agreement, which is more fully described below. On August 28, 2003, one of the Company's foreign subsidiaries, WestPoint Stevens (Europe) Ltd., commenced an insolvency proceeding in the United Kingdom and is in the process of being closed and liquidated.
The Company's consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States on a going concern basis. Except as otherwise disclosed, these principles assume that assets will be realized and liabilities will be discharged in the ordinary course of business. The Company is currently operating as a debtor in possession under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, and its continuation as a going concern is contingent upon, among other things, the confirmation by the Bankruptcy Court of a chapter 11 plan of reorganization and its ability to comply with the DIP Credit Agreement, return to profitability, generate sufficient cash flows from operations and obtain financing sources to meet future obligations. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to achieve any of these results. The Company's consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the rec overability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.
Whether as a result of its case under chapter 11 or otherwise, the Company may sell or otherwise dispose of assets, and liquidate or settle liabilities, for amounts other than those reflected in the financial statements. Additionally, the amounts reported on the consolidated balance sheets could materially change because of changes in business strategies and the effects of any proposed plan of reorganization.
Basis of Presentation
The Company's consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with AICPA Statement of Position 90-7 ("Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code") ("SOP 90-7"). In the chapter 11 case, substantially all unsecured liabilities as of the Petition Date are subject to compromise or other treatment under a plan of reorganization which must be confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court after submission to any required vote by affected parties. For financial reporting purposes, the categories of liabilities and obligations whose treatment and satisfaction are dependent on the outcome of the chapter 11 case have been classified as Liabilities Subject to Compromise in the consolidated balance sheets. The ultimate amount of and settlement terms for the
26
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)
Basis of Presentation--Continued
Company's pre-bankruptcy liabilities are subject to the ultimate outcome of its chapter 11 case and, accordingly, are not presently determinable. Pursuant to SOP 90-7, professional fees associated with the chapter 11 case are expensed as incurred and reported as reorganization costs (chapter 11 expenses). Also, interest expense is reported only to the extent that it is paid during the pendency of the chapter 11 case or that it is probable that it will be an allowed claim.
Effective March 31, 2003, the Company's Senior Credit Facility was amended primarily to provide for an interim facility limitation and to add an unused commitment fee. At the option of the Company and effective with the March 31, 2003 amendment to the Senior Credit Facility, interest under the Senior Credit Facility was payable monthly, either at the prime rate plus 5.25% or at LIBOR plus 7.00%, compared to prime rate plus 2.75% or LIBOR plus 4.50% in effect at December 31, 2002. Effective with the chapter 11 filing, loans under the Senior Credit Facility are no longer available to the Company. Prior to the Petition Date, the Company was also obligated to pay a facility fee in an amount equal to 0.50% of each Bank's commitment under the Revolver, and an unused commitment fee in an amount equal to 1.00% of the difference between the revolver commitment and the daily outstanding loans and letters of credit. As of the Petition Date, the Company is no longer obligated to pay a facility fee or an unused commitment fee for the Senior Credit Facility.
At March 31, 2003, and prior to the petition date, the Company was not in compliance with certain of its covenants under the Senior Credit Facility and Second-Lien Facility during which time the Company engaged in active discussions with its senior lenders to obtain an amendment or waiver of such non-compliance (See Note 2 where the chronology of the circumstances causing the Company to file voluntary petitions for reorganization under chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code is discussed).
The Company is a party to the DIP Credit Agreement which provides a facility consisting of revolving credit loans of up to $300 million (with a sublimit of $75 million for letters of credit) with an initial term of one year and an initial maturity date of June 2, 2004. At its option, the Company may extend the term for up to two successive periods of six months each. On April 28, 2004 the Company exercised its first option to extend the DIP Credit Agreement for an additional six month period, revising the maturity date to December 2, 2004.
27
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)
DIP Credit Agreement--Continued
Initial advances under the DIP Credit Agreement bore interest at a fluctuating rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus a margin of 2.75% or, at the Company's option, prime plus a margin of 0.75%. Each margin is subject to quarterly adjustments, commencing November 1, 2003, pursuant to a pricing matrix, based on average availability, having a range of 2.25% to 3.00% for LIBOR based loans and 0.25% to 1.00% for prime based loans. The DIP Credit Agreement also has an unused line fee of 0.625% per annum, subject to quarterly adjustments as above having a range of 0.375% to 0.75%. Effective November 1, 2003, as a result of average availability, interest rates under the DIP Credit Agreement decreased to LIBOR plus 2.50% or, at the Company's option, prime plus 0.50% and the unused line fee decreased to 0.50%. Effective February 1, 2004, as a result of average availability, interest rates under the DIP Credit Agreement increased to LIBOR plus 2.75% or, at the Company's option, prime plus 0.75% and the unused line fee increased to 0.625%.
The DIP Credit Agreement contains a number of covenants, including among others, affirmative and negative covenants with respect to certain financial tests and other indebtedness, as well as restrictions against the declaration or payment of dividends, the making of certain intercompany advances and the disposition of assets without consent. The DIP Credit Agreement also contains Events of Default (as defined in the DIP Credit Agreement) including among others, a failure to pay the principal and interest of the obligations when due, default with respect to any Debt (as defined in the DIP Credit Agreement) and a failure by the Company to comply with any provisions of the Financing Orders (as defined in the DIP Credit Agreement).
During the third quarter of 2003, the Company's DIP Credit Agreement was amended primarily to modify the minimum EBITDA covenant, add a minimum availability covenant, permit certain restructuring, impairment and other charges and modify other miscellaneous provisions. During the second quarter of 2004, the Company's DIP Credit Agreement was further amended to clarify certain asset sale provisions, and during the third quarter of 2004, the DIP Credit Agreement was amended primarily to modify the minimum EBITDA and minimum availability covenants to permit certain inventory reduction plans. At June 30, 2004, the Company was in compliance with its covenants under the DIP Credit Agreement.
There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be able to continue to comply with the debt covenants or that, if it fails to do so, it will be able to obtain amendments to or waivers of such covenants. Failure of the Company to comply with covenants contained in its DIP Credit Agreement, if not waived, or to adequately service debt obligations, could result in a default under the DIP Credit Agreement. Any default under the Company's DIP Credit Agreement, particularly any default that results in acceleration of indebtedness or foreclosure on collateral, could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
28
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)
Restructuring, Impairment, and Other Charges
In 2000, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved the new Eight-Point Plan, which was created to be the guiding discipline for the Company in a global economy. The Board also approved a pretax charge for restructuring, impairment and other charges to cover the initial cost of implementing the Eight-Point Plan that is designed to streamline operations and improve profitability. The Eight-Point Plan addresses the following points: 1) expand brands; 2) explore new licensing opportunities; 3) rationalize manufacturing; 4) reduce overhead; 5) increase global sourcing; 6) improve inventory utilization; 7) enhance supply chain and logistics; and 8) improve capital structure.
On September 20, 2002, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved additional restructuring initiatives to increase asset utilization, lower manufacturing costs and increase cash flow and profitability through reallocation of production assets from bath products to basic bedding products and through rationalization of its retail stores division. The Company initially expected the restructuring initiatives to result in a $36.5 million pretax charge for restructuring, impairment and other charges, with approximately $20 million of the pretax charge expected to be non-cash items. As a result of additions to the initial restructuring initiatives related to the closure of its Rosemary (NC) towel fabrication and distribution facilities and its WestPoint Stevens (Europe) Ltd. foreign subsidiary, the Company's restructuring initiatives resulted in a $47.7 million pretax charge for restructuring, impairment and other charges, with approximately $31.7 million of the pretax charge being non-cash items. All charges were recorded in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. The restructuring charge approved in 2002 was completed in the second quarter of 2004.
As a result of the restructuring initiatives begun in 2002, the Company announced the closure of its Rosemary (NC) towel finishing facility, the conversion of its Rosemary (NC) towel fabrication and distribution facilities to basic bedding facilities and the closure of its Dalton (GA) utility bedding facility. The Company announced on April 25, 2003 that the Rosemary (NC) towel fabrication and distribution facilities that were previously disclosed as being converted to basic bedding facilities would now be closed. The Company also announced the closure of twenty-two retail stores and the closure of its WestPoint Stevens (Europe) Ltd. foreign subsidiary.
The cost of the manufacturing and retail store rationalization and certain overhead reduction costs were reflected in a restructuring and impairment charge of $6.6 million, before taxes, in 2002, a restructuring and impairment charge of $12.6 million, before taxes, in 2003 and a restructuring and impairment charge of $0.4 million, before taxes, in the first six months of 2004. The components of the restructuring and impairment charge in 2002 included $4.4 million for the impairment of fixed assets and $2.2 million in reserves to cover cash expenses related primarily to severance benefits. The components of the restructuring and impairment charge in 2003 included $7.0 million for the impairment of fixed assets and $5.6 million in reserves to cover cash expenses related to severance benefits of $5.2 million and other exit costs. The components of the restructuring and impairment charge in the first six months of 2004 included $0.4 million in reserves to cover cash expenses related to severance benefits.
29
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)
Restructuring, Impairment and Other Charges--Continued
During 2002, 2003 and 2004 as a result of restructuring initiatives approved in 2002, the Company has terminated and agreed to pay severance (including continuing termination benefits) to approximately 500 employees.
The following is a summary of the restructuring and impairment activity in the related reserves (in millions):
Employee |
Other |
||||||||||||
Writedown |
Termination |
Exit |
Total |
||||||||||
Assets |
Benefits |
Costs |
Charge |
||||||||||
2002 Restructuring and Impairment Charge: |
|||||||||||||
Third Quarter |
$ |
4.3 |
$ |
1.6 |
$ |
- |
$ |
5.9 |
|||||
Fourth Quarter |
0.1 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
0.7 |
|||||||||
Total 2002 Charge |
4.4 |
2.1 |
0.1 |
6.6 |
|||||||||
2003 Restructuring and Impairment Charge: |
|||||||||||||
First Quarter |
0.2 |
0.8 |
0.4 |
1.4 |
|||||||||
Second Quarter |
6.8 |
4.3 |
0.8 |
11.9 |
|||||||||
Third Quarter |
0.8 |
0.2 |
- |
1.0 |
|||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
(0.8) |
(0.1) |
(0.8) |
(1.7) |
|||||||||
Total 2003 Charge |
7.0 |
5.2 |
0.4 |
12.6 |
|||||||||
2004 Restructuring and Impairment Charge: |
|||||||||||||
First Quarter |
- |
0.2 |
- |
0.2 |
|||||||||
Second Quarter |
- |
0.2 |
- |
0.2 |
|||||||||
Total 2004 Charge |
- |
0.4 |
- |
0.4 |
|||||||||
Writedown Assets to Net Recoverable Value |
(11.4) |
- |
- |
(11.4) |
|||||||||
2002 Cash Payments |
- |
(1.5) |
- |
(1.5) |
|||||||||
2003 Cash Payments |
- |
(4.6) |
(0.4) |
(5.0) |
|||||||||
2004 Cash Payments |
- |
(1.0) |
- |
(1.0) |
|||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2004 |
$ |
- |
$ |
0.6 |
$ |
0.1 |
$ |
0.7 |
|||||
During 2002, other costs of the restructuring initiatives of $11.6 million, before taxes, were recognized consisting of inventory writedowns of $10.5 million primarily related to the rationalization of its retail stores division and other expenses of $1.1 million, consisting primarily of related unabsorbed overhead, all reflected in cost of goods sold. During 2003, other costs of the restructuring initiatives of $16.0 million, before taxes, were recognized consisting of inventory writedowns of $8.4 million primarily related to the closure of its foreign subsidiary and the rationalization of its retail stores division, accounts receivable writedowns for claims of $1.4 million related to the closure of its foreign subsidiary and other expenses of $6.2 million, consisting primarily of $4.1 million of related unabsorbed overhead, $1.2 million for the relocation of machinery and other expenses of $0.9 million, all reflected in cost of goods sold. During the first six month s of 2004, other costs of the restructuring initiatives of $0.4 million, before taxes, were recognized for relocation of machinery, all reflected in cost of goods sold.
30
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)
Restructuring, Impairment and Other Charges--Continued
During the third quarter of 2003, the Company's Board of Directors approved further additional restructuring initiatives to increase asset utilization, lower manufacturing costs and increase cash flow and profitability through a further realignment of manufacturing capacity. Costs of restructuring initiatives may result in restructuring, impairment and other pretax charges of up to $84.3 million, of which up to $55.6 million of the pretax charge may relate to non-cash items. The charges for the restructuring initiatives began in the fourth quarter of 2003 and will continue throughout 2004 in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.
As a result of the restructuring initiatives begun in 2003, the Company announced the closure of its Dunson (GA) sheeting facility, its Dixie (GA) towel facility, its Coushatta (LA) utility bedding facility and its Fairfax (AL) towel greige facility. The Company also announced the conversion of its Lanier (AL) sheeting facility to towel production and the conversion of its Greenville (AL) blanket facility to a utility bedding facility. These plant closings and conversions will provide the Company with greater production efficiency and better-aligned capacity to compete more effectively in a global economy.
The cost of the manufacturing rationalization was reflected in a restructuring and impairment charge of $37.0 million, before taxes, in 2003 and a restructuring and impairment charge of $7.9 million, before taxes, in the first six months of 2004. The restructuring and impairment charge in 2003 reflected the impairment of fixed assets. The components of the restructuring and impairment charge in the first six months of 2004 included $1.8 million for the impairment of fixed assets and $6.1 million in reserves to cover cash expenses related to severance benefits.
During 2004 as a result of restructuring initiatives approved in 2003, the Company has terminated and agreed to pay severance (including continuing termination benefits) to approximately 650 employees.
31
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)
Restructuring, Impairment and Other Charges--Continued
The following is a summary of the restructuring and impairment activity in the related reserves (in millions):
Employee |
Other |
||||||||||||
Writedown |
Termination |
Exit |
Total |
||||||||||
Assets |
Benefits |
Costs |
Charge |
||||||||||
2003 Restructuring and Impairment Charge: |
|||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ |
37.0 |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
37.0 |
|||||
2004 Restructuring and Impairment Charge: |
|||||||||||||
First Quarter |
- |
4.6 |
- |
4.6 |
|||||||||
Second Quarter |
1.8 |
1.5 |
- |
3.3 |
|||||||||
Total 2004 Charge |
1.8 |
6.1 |
- |
7.9 |
|||||||||
Writedown Assets to Net Recoverable Value |
(38.8) |
- |
- |
(38.8) |
|||||||||
2004 Cash Payments |
- |
(2.7) |
- |
(2.7) |
|||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2004 |
$ |
- |
$ |
3.4 |
$ |
- |
$ |
3.4 |
|||||
During 2003, other costs of the restructuring initiatives of $1.4 million, before taxes, were recognized consisting of inventory writedowns of $1.0 million and other expenses of $0.4 million, consisting of related unabsorbed overhead, all reflected in cost of goods sold. During the first six months of 2004, other costs of the restructuring initiatives of $8.1 million, before taxes, were recognized consisting primarily of $6.9 million of related unabsorbed overhead and $1.2 million for the relocation of machinery, all reflected in cost of goods sold.
Executive Summary
Overview
The Company operates exclusively in the home fashions industry and recognizes revenue primarily through the sale of Home Fashions products to a variety of retail and institutional customers. The Company also operates 37 retail outlets that sell home fashion products including but not limited to WestPoint Stevens' home fashion products. In addition, the Company receives a small portion of its revenues through the licensing of its trade names.
Industry and Company Profile
Cyclicality
The home fashion textile industry has traditionally been a cyclical industry. The latest down cycle began in 2000 and is reported to be showing signs of a turn upward. The practical effect of a down cycle on manufacturing companies, including the Company, is stress on any balance sheet which has a large debt load and pressure on profitability caused by under utilization of plant and equipment.
32
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)
Executive Summary--Continued
Growth of Imports
The easing of trade restrictions over time has led to growing competition from low priced imported product. This issue will be amplified by the projected lifting of import quotas in the year 2005. Imported sheets and towels have captured 44% and 54%, respectively, of the U.S. market according to U.S. Census data for 2003. Domestic suppliers, including the Company, have contributed to the import total by buying product overseas for resale domestically. Approximately 22% of the Company's 2003 sales were of imported goods. The Company has recently closed four domestic manufacturing facilities in favor of importing those products.
Retail Consolidation
Retailers of consumer goods have become fewer and more powerful over time. As buying power has become more concentrated, pricing pressure on vendors has grown. With the ability to buy imported product directly from the foreign source, this pricing leverage has increased. The result has been a negative effect on unit pricing and margins earned on domestically produced products. To combat this trend, domestic producers, such as the Company, are aggressively importing competitively priced goods and utilizing domestic distribution capabilities and the ability to deliver large volumes on short notice to maintain their value to the retail customers.
External Events
Sales and availability of consumer goods are directly impacted by external events. The attacks of 9/11 severely impacted retail sales and vendor shipments nationwide. The west coast dock strike kept imported goods from reaching their destinations and was an advantage for domestic suppliers. Snowstorms in 2004 slowed retail sales and temporarily closed production facilities.
Raw Material Pricing and Availability
Textile profitability is affected more by raw material pricing than any other single variable. A one-cent per pound change in cotton pricing can have an enormous effect on product profitability. Over the past three years the price of cotton has varied significantly, both up and down. The Company employs a hedging strategy to smooth the volatility of the cotton market and to reduce uncertainty in costing. Other raw materials are down and feathers for pillows and comforters and also polyester for sheeting and pillows. Down and feathers are generally imported from China. Pricing is subject to vacillations in supply caused by any number of things. Polyester prices vary with the price of petroleum.
33
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)
Executive Summary--Continued
Working Capital Management
Inventory management is the most critical variable to the success of a textile company. Inventory is produced prospectively based on customer provided forecasts in order to be ready to ship on a quick response basis. Growing sophistication of retail systems has provided the customer with the ability to recognize trends rapidly and to change forecasts on much shorter notice than in the past. This ability presents unique challenges to the manufacturer who produces inventory in advance of anticipated orders. To manage inventory balances, the Company has moved to smaller lot sizes in some cases, but most importantly, the Company has chosen to curtail production where necessary in order not to create unwanted inventory. Curtailment has a negative effect on profitability but preserves cash that would have otherwise been invested in inventory.
34
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)
Results of Operations
The table below is a summary of the Company's operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2003 (in millions of dollars).
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
|||||||||||
June 30, |
June 30, |
|||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||
Net sales |
$ |
383.0 |
$ |
365.7 |
$ |
782.6 |
$ |
745.0 |
||||
Gross earnings |
$ |
52.3 |
$ |
57.7 |
$ |
120.5 |
$ |
131.1 |
||||
Restructuring and impairment charge |
$ |
3.5 |
$ |
11.9 |
$ |
8.3 |
$ |
13.3 |
||||
Goodwill impairment charge |
$ |
- |
$ |
46.3 |
$ |
- |
$ |
46.3 |
||||
Operating earnings (loss) |
$ |
(7.4) |
$ |
(61.5) |
$ |
0.1 |
$ |
(52.9) |
||||
Interest expense |
$ |
19.1 |
$ |
31.2 |
$ |
36.9 |
$ |
63.7 |
||||
Other expense (income)-net |
$ |
(1.8) |
$ |
7.9 |
$ |
1.0 |
$ |
10.4 |
||||
Chapter 11 expenses |
$ |
8.4 |
$ |
6.2 |
$ |
16.5 |
$ |
6.2 |
||||
Loss before taxes |
$ |
(33.1) |
$ |
(106.8) |
$ |
(54.3) |
$ |
(133.3) |
||||
Net Loss |
$ |
(24.0) |
$ |
(72.0) |
$ |
(38.9) |
$ |
(89.0) |
||||
Gross margin |
13.7 % |
15.8 % |
15.4% |
17.6 % |
||||||||
Operating margin |
(1.9)% |
(16.8)% |
-% |
(7.1)% |
35
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)
Results of Operations: |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 Compared to |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2003 |
Net Sales. Net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2004 increased $17.3 million, or 4.7% to $383.0 million compared with net sales of $365.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. This growth was a result of the Company's increased market share in towels and utility products given the recent liquidation of a major competitor and more than offset lower sales of bedding accessories, sales declines at the Company's retail stores due to store closings, and the absence of European sales due to its impending liquidation. During the period the Company experienced sales increases across all distribution channels, with the exception of department stores.
For the three months ended June 30, 2004, bed products sales were $205.1 million compared with $211.1 million for the same period in 2003; bath products sales were $150.0 million compared with $116.6 million for the same period in 2003; and other sales (consisting primarily of sales from the Company's mill stores and foreign operations) were $27.9 million compared with $38.0 million for the same period in 2003.
Gross Earnings/Margins. Gross earnings for the three months ended June 30, 2004 decreased $5.4 million, or 9.3%, to $52.3 million compared with $57.7 million for the same period of 2003, and reflect gross margins of 13.7% in 2004 versus 15.8% in 2003. Gross earnings and margins decreased primarily as a result of a less profitable mix of revenues, a higher level of sell-offs to reduce inventory levels, and increased raw material costs that more than offset improved manufacturing efficiencies due to better running schedules and price increases implemented early in 2004. Included in the cost of goods sold in the second quarter of 2004 are charges associated with recent restructuring initiatives of $5.5 million, the majority of which reflects costs for unabsorbed overhead at affected facilities and equipment relocation versus $4.7 million in 2003 which reflected costs for unabsorbed overhead at affected facilities and inventory write-offs primaril y related to the rationalization of the retail stores division.
Operating Earnings(Loss). Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $4.6 million, or 7.6%, in the second quarter of 2004 to $56.3 million compared with $60.9 million in the same period of last year, and as a percentage of net sales represent 14.7% in the 2004 period and 16.7% in the 2003 period. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses in the second quarter of 2004 and as a percentage of sales was due to elimination of expenses as a result of the rationalization of the retail stores division and the elimination of the European operations as well as the absence of fees associated with the Trade Receivables Facility which was terminated in July of 2003.
Operating loss for the second quarter of 2004 decreased $54.0 million to a loss of $7.4 million, compared with operating losses of $61.5 million for the same period in 2003. Operating earnings for the three months ended June 30, 2004, included a separate line item for restructuring and impairment
36
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)
Results of Operations: |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 Compared to |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2003--Continued |
Operating Earnings (Loss)--Continued
charges to reflect $3.5 million in severance benefits and impairment of fixed assets in addition to charges associated with recent restructuring initiatives of $5.5 million, the majority of which reflects costs for unabsorbed overhead at affected facilities and equipment relocation. For the three months ended June 30, 2003, operating earnings included a separate line item for restructuring and impairment charges of $11.9 million to reflect severance benefits and impairment of fixed assets in addition to charges associated with restructuring initiatives of $4.7 million which reflected costs for unabsorbed overhead at affected facilities and inventory write-offs primarily related to the rationalization of the retail stores division, and a goodwill impairment charge of $46.3 million.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2004 of $19.1 million decreased $12.1 million compared with interest expense of $31.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. Effective with the Company's Chapter 11 filing, interest is no longer accrued on the Senior Notes due 2005 and 2008, the impact of which was $19.7 million in the second quarter of 2004 and $6.1 million in the second quarter of 2003. The decrease in interest expense was partially offset by higher interest rates on the Company's variable rate bank debt for 2004 compared with corresponding 2003 average interest rates and higher debt levels compared with corresponding 2003 outstanding debt.
Other Expense (Income) - Net. Other income-net in the second quarter of 2004 of $1.8 million consisted primarily of the amortization of deferred financing fees of $3.3 million, less certain miscellaneous income items including a $5.6 million gain on the sale of equipment. Other expense-net in the second quarter of 2003 consisted primarily of $4.9 million in transaction costs associated with an unsuccessful acquisition effort and the amortization of deferred financing fees of $3.2 million, less certain miscellaneous income items.
Chapter 11 Expenses. The Company recognized $8.4 million in bankruptcy reorganization related expenses in the second quarter of 2004 consisting primarily of $1.0 million related to amortization of fees associated with the DIP Credit Agreement, $0.1 million in severance associated with the resignation of the Company's former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, $2.2 million for performance bonuses under a court approved Key Employee Retention Plan and $5.1 million related to fees payable to professionals retained to assist with the Chapter 11 case. During the second quarter of 2003, the Company recognized charges of $6.2 million for chapter 11 expenses, consisting of $4.9 million related to the early termination of the Company's Trade Receivables Program, $0.4 million related to the amortization of fees associated with the DIP Credit Agreement and $0.9 million related to fees payable to professionals retained to assist with the chapter 11 case.
37
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)
Results of Operations: |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 Compared to |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2003--Continued |
Income Tax Expense (Benefit). For the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, Company recorded a tax benefit of $9.1 million and $34.8 million, respectively. The Company's effective tax rate was 27.5% in 2004 and 32.6% in 2003. The decrease in the effective tax rate was due primarily to non-deductible items related to the Company's chapter 11 expenses. See Note 9 where income taxes are discussed further.
Net Loss. Net loss for the second quarter of 2004 was $24.0 million or a loss of $0.48 per share diluted, compared with a loss of $72.0 million or a loss of $1.44 per share diluted, for the same period in 2003. Included in net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2004 were costs related to restructuring initiatives, net of taxes, of $5.7 million, or $0.12 loss per diluted share, as previously discussed versus costs related to restructuring initiatives, net of taxes, in the year ago period of $10.6 million, or $0.21 loss per diluted share.
Diluted per share amounts are based on 49.9 million average shares outstanding for both 2004 and 2003.
Results of Operations: |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 Compared to |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 |
Net Sales. Net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased $37.7 million, or 5.1% to $782.6 million compared with net sales of $745.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. As a result of a strengthening economy, improvement in overall retail sales led to improved sales performance for the Company with increases in sales across all distribution channels, with the exception of department stores. The Company increased market share in towels and utility products given the recent liquidation of a major competitor and this growth more than offset lower sales of bedding accessories, sales declines at the Company's retail stores due to store closings, and the absence of European sales due to its impending liquidation.
For the six months ended June 30, 2004, bed products sales were $438.4 million compared with $425.7 million for the same period in 2003; bath products sales were $291.1 million compared with $244.6 million for the same period in 2003; and other sales (consisting primarily of sales from the Company's mill stores and foreign operations) were $53.2 million compared with $74.7 million for the same period in 2003.
Gross Earnings/Margins. Gross earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2004 decreased $10.6 million, or 8.1%, to $120.5 million compared with $131.1 million for the same period of 2003, and reflect gross margin of 15.4% in 2004 versus 17.6% in 2003. Gross earnings and margin decreased primarily as a result of a less profitable mix of revenues, and increased raw material costs that more than offset improved manufacturing efficiencies due to better running schedules and price increases
38
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)
Results of Operations: |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 Compared to |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2003--Continued |
Gross Earnings/Margins--Continued
implemented early in 2004. Included in the cost of goods sold in the first six months of 2004 are charges associated with recent restructuring initiatives of $8.5 million, the majority of which reflects costs for unabsorbed overhead at affected facilities and equipment relocation versus $7.6 million in 2003 which reflected costs for unabsorbed overhead at affected facilities and inventory write-offs primarily related to the rationalization of the retail stores division.
Operating Earnings (Loss). Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $12.3 million, or 9.9%, in the first half of 2004 to $112.1 million compared with $124.4 million in the same period of last year, and as a percentage of net sales represent 14.3% in the 2004 period and 16.7% in the 2003 period. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses in the first half of 2004 and as a percentage of sales was due to elimination of expenses as a result of the rationalization of the retail stores division and the elimination of the European operations as well as the absence of fees associated with the Trade Receivables Facility which was terminated in July of 2003.
Operating earnings for the first six months of 2004 increased to $0.1 million, compared with operating losses of $52.9 million for the same period in 2003. Operating earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2004, included a separate line item for restructuring and impairment charges to reflect $8.3 million in severance benefits and impairment of fixed assets in addition to charges associated with recent restructuring initiatives of $8.5 million, the majority of which reflects costs for unabsorbed overhead at affected facilities and equipment relocation. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, operating earnings included a separate line item for restructuring and impairment charges of $13.3 million to reflect primarily severance benefits and impairment of fixed assets in addition to charges associated with restructuring initiatives of $7.6 million which reflected costs for unabsorbed overhead at affected facilities and inventory write-offs primarily related to the rationalization of the retail stores division, and a goodwill impairment charge of $46.3 million.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2004 of $36.9 million decreased $26.7 million compared with interest expense of $63.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. Effective with the Company's Chapter 11 filing, interest is no longer accrued on the Senior Notes due 2005 and 2008, the impact of which was $38.5 million in the first half of 2004 and $6.1 million in the first half of 2003. The decrease in interest expense was partially offset by higher interest rates on the Company's variable rate bank debt for 2004 compared with corresponding 2003 average interest rates and higher debt levels compared with corresponding 2003 outstanding debt.
Other Expense-Net. Other expense-net in the first half of 2004 of $1.0 million consisted primarily of the amortization of deferred financing fees of $6.5 million, less certain miscellaneous income items including a $5.6 million gain on the sale of looms compared with other expense-net for the first six months of 2003 which consisted primarily of the amortization of deferred financing fees of $5.8 million, less certain miscellaneous income items and $4.9 million in transaction costs associated with an unsuccessful acquisition effort.
39
WESTPOINT WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)
Results of Operations: |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 Compared to |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2003--Continued |
Chapter 11 Expenses. The Company recognized $16.5 million in bankruptcy reorganization related expenses in the first six months of 2004 consisting primarily of $2.3 million related to amortization of fees associated with the DIP Credit Agreement, $0.2 million in severance associated with the resignation of the Company's former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, $5.3 million for performance bonuses under a court approved Key Employee Retention Plan and $8.7 million related to fees payable to professionals retained to assist with the Chapter 11 case. During the first six months of 2003, the Company recognized charges of $6.2 million for chapter 11 expenses, consisting of $4.9 million related to the early termination of the Company's Trade Receivables Program, $0.4 million related to the amortization of fees associated with the DIP Credit Agreement and $0.9 million related to fees payable to professionals retained to assist with the chapter 11 case.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit). In the first six months of 2004 and 2003, the Company recorded a tax benefit of $15.4 million and $44.3 million, respectively. The Company's effective tax rate was 28.4% in 2004 and 33.2% in 2003. The decrease in the effective tax rate was due primarily to non-deductible items related to the Company's chapter 11 expenses. See Note 9 where income taxes are discussed further.
Net Loss. Net loss for the first six months of 2004 was $38.9 million or a loss of $0.78 per share diluted, compared with a loss of $89.0 million or a loss of $1.78 per share diluted, for the same period in 2003. Included in net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2004 were costs related to restructuring initiatives, net of taxes, of $10.7 million, or $0.22 loss per diluted share, as previously discussed versus costs related to restructuring initiatives, net of taxes, in the year ago period of $13.4 million, or $0.27 loss per diluted share.
Diluted per share amounts are based on 49.9 million average shares outstanding for both 2004 and 2003.
Effects of Inflation
The Company believes that the relatively moderate rate of inflation over the past few years has not had a significant impact on its sales or profitability.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
So long as the Company remains under the protection of chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, its principal sources of liquidity are expected to be cash generated from its operations and funds available under the DIP Credit Agreement. The maximum commitment under the DIP Credit
40
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)
Liquidity and Capital Resources--Continued
Agreement is $300 million. At June 30, 2004, borrowing availability under the DIP Credit Agreement was $119.9 million and consisted of a calculated borrowing base of $307.5 million (limited to the maximum commitment of $300 million) less outstanding loans of $136.1 million, outstanding letters of credit of $39.0 million and other reserves of $5.0 million. For additional information about the DIP Credit Agreement, see "-- DIP Credit Agreement" above.
During the pendency of its chapter 11 case, the Company's principal uses of cash will be administrative expenses of the chapter 11 case, operating expenses, capital expenditures and debt service (including both interest payments under the DIP Credit Agreement and whatever payments may be made in respect of pre-petition debt in accordance with orders of the Bankruptcy Court).
There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be able to comply with the debt covenants or that, if it fails to do so, it will be able to obtain amendments to or waivers of such covenants. Failure of the Company to comply with covenants contained in its DIP Credit Agreement, if not waived, or to adequately service debt obligations, could result in a default under the DIP Credit Agreement. Any default under the Company's DIP Credit Agreement, particularly any default that results in acceleration of indebtedness or foreclosure on collateral, could have a material adverse effect on the Company. At June 30, 2004, the Company was in compliance with its covenants under the DIP Credit Agreement.
Adequacy of Capital Resources
As a result of the uncertainty surrounding the Company's current circumstances, it is difficult to predict the Company's actual liquidity needs and sources at this time. However, based on current and anticipated levels of operations, and efforts to effectively manage working capital, the Company anticipates that its cash flows from operations, cash generated from asset sales, and amounts available under the DIP Credit Agreement, will be adequate to meet its anticipated cash requirements during the pendency of the Chapter 11 proceedings.
In the event that cash flows and available borrowings under the DIP Credit Agreement are not sufficient to meet future cash requirements, the Company may be required to reduce planned capital expenditures, sell assets or seek additional financing. The Company can provide no assurances that reductions in planned capital expenditures or proceeds from asset sales would be sufficient to cover shortfalls in available cash or that additional financing would be available or, if available, offered on acceptable terms.
As a result of the Chapter 11 proceedings, the Company's access to additional financing is, and for the foreseeable future will likely continue to be, very limited. The Company's long-term liquidity requirements and the adequacy of the Company's capital resources are difficult to predict at this time, and ultimately cannot be determined until a plan of reorganization has been developed and confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court in connection with the Chapter 11 proceedings.
41
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
The Company's exposure to market risk has not materially changed from what was reported on the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Company management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15e as of June 30, 2004. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of June 30, 2004, the disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that all material information required to be filed in this quarterly report has been made known to them in a timely fashion. There have been no significant changes in internal controls, or in factors that could significantly affect internal controls during the period covered by this report.
42
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Except as stated below, as of the Petition Date, the following actions in which the Company is a defendant have been enjoined from further proceedings pursuant to section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code. To the extent parties have filed timely proofs of claim, the Bankruptcy Court will determine the amount of their pre-bankruptcy claims against the Company. In certain instances, the Bankruptcy Court may permit actions to proceed to judgment for the purpose of determining the amount of the pre-bankruptcy claim against the Company. Lawsuits based on facts arising solely after the commencement of the Company's chapter 11 case are not stayed by section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code.
On October 5, 2001, a purported stockholder class action suit, entitled Norman Geller v. WestPoint Stevens Inc., et al. (the "Geller action"), was filed against the Company and certain of its former officers and directors in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. (A subsequent and functionally identical complaint was also filed.) The actions were consolidated by Order dated January 25, 2002. Plaintiffs served a Consolidated Amended Complaint (the "Amended Complaint") on March 29, 2002. The Amended Complaint asserts claims against all Defendants under section 10(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder and against the Company and Defendant Holcombe T. Green, Jr. as "controlling persons" under section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The Amended Complaint alleges that, during the putative class period (i.e., February 10, 1999, to October 10, 2000), the Company and certa in of its officers and directors caused false and misleading statements to be issued regarding, inter alia, alleged overcapacity and excessive inventories of the Company's towel-related products and customer demand for such products and that certain Individual Defendants wrongfully sold or pledged Company stock at inflated prices for their benefit. The Amended Complaint refers to the Company's press releases and quarterly and annual reports on Securities Exchange Commission Forms 10-Q and 10-K, which discuss the Company's results and forecasts for the fiscal years 1999 and 2000. Plaintiffs allege that these press releases and public filings were false and misleading because they failed to disclose that the Company allegedly "knew sales would be adversely affected in future quarters and years." Plaintiffs also allege in general terms that the Company materially overstated revenues by making premature shipments of products.
On June 6, 2002, Defendants filed Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint. On February 3, 2003, the court denied Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. The Company has been informed by counsel that its insurance carrier has reached an agreement in principle to settle the Geller action at no cost to the Company, subject to definitive documentation and approvals of the court and the Bankruptcy court.
In the opinion of management, settlement of the previously disclosed shareholder actions under existing insurance coverage is probable. As a result of the settlement in principle (subject to court approval) of the Geller case, during the second quarter of 2004, the Company recorded a liability of $4,250,000 for its legal obligation to fund the settlement and a related receivable of $4,250,000 for the reimbursement from its insurance carrier.
43
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION--Continued
Item 1. Legal Proceedings--Continued
On March 11, 2002, a shareholder derivative action, entitled Gordon Clark v. Holcombe T. Green, Jr., et al. (the "Clark action"), was filed against certain of the Company's former directors and officers in the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia. The Complaint alleges that the named individuals breached their fiduciary duties by acting in bad faith and wasting corporate assets. The Complaint also asserts claims under Georgia Code Ann. sections 14-2-740 to 14-2-747 and 14-2-831. The claims are based on the same or similar facts as are alleged in the Geller action.
On July 1, 2002, a shareholder derivative action, entitled John Hemmer v. Holcombe T. Green, Jr., et al. (the "Hemmer action"), was filed against Mr. Green and certain of the Company's other current and former directors including Messrs. Hugh M. Chapman, John F. Sorte and Ms. M. Katherine Dwyer in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County. The Complaint alleges that the named individuals breached their fiduciary duties and knowingly or recklessly failed to exercise oversight responsibilities to ensure the integrity of the Company's financial reporting. The Complaint also asserts that certain of the named individuals used proprietary Company information in selling or pledging Company stock at inflated prices for their benefit. The claims are based on the same or similar facts as are alleged in the Geller action.
By agreements between the parties, the Clark and Hemmer actions were both stayed pending entry of final judgment by the court in the Geller action. As with the Geller action, the Clark and Hemmer actions were also stayed due to the Company's bankruptcy filing.
The Clark action has been voluntarily dismissed. The Company has been informed by counsel that they expect the Hemmer action to be dismissed.
On March 21, 2002, an Adversary Complaint of Debtors and Debtors in Possession Against WestPoint Stevens Inc. was filed by Pillowtex, Inc., a Delaware corporation, et al., and Pillowtex Corporation, et al., against the Company in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. Pillowtex Corporation and its related and affiliated companies ("Pillowtex") as Debtors and Debtors in Possession allege breach of a postpetition contract (the "Sale Agreement") dated January 31, 2001, among Pillowtex, Ralph Lauren Home Collection, Inc. ("RLH") and Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation ("PRLC") collectively referred to as "Ralph Lauren" and the Company. Pillowtex alleges that the Company refused to perform its purchase obligation under the Sales Agreement and is liable to it for $4,800,000 plus potentially significant other consequential damages. The Company believes that the complaint is without merit and intends to contest the action vigorousl y. The case is currently stayed due to the Company's bankruptcy filing.
The Company is subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations governing, among other things, the discharge, storage, handling and disposal of a variety of hazardous and nonhazardous substances and wastes used in or resulting from its operations and potential remediation obligations thereunder. Certain of the Company's facilities (including certain
44
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION--Continued
Item 1. Legal Proceedings--Continued
facilities no longer owned or utilized by the Company) have been cited or are being investigated with respect to alleged violations of such laws and regulations. The Company is cooperating fully with relevant parties and authorities in all such matters. The Company believes that it has adequately provided in its financial statements for any expenses and liabilities that may result from such matters. The Company also is insured with respect to certain of such matters. The Company's operations are governed by laws and regulations relating to employee safety and health which, among other things, establish exposure limitations for cotton dust, formaldehyde, asbestos and noise, and regulate chemical and ergonomic hazards in the workplace.
Although the Company does not expect that compliance with any of such laws and regulations will adversely affect the Company's operations, there can be no assurance such regulatory requirements will not become more stringent in the future or that the Company will not incur significant costs in the future to comply with such requirements.
The Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various other legal proceedings, both as plaintiff and as defendant, which are normal to its business. It is the opinion of management that the aforementioned actions and claims, if determined adversely to the Company, will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or operations of the Company taken as a whole.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
The commencement of the Chapter 11 proceedings constitutes an event of default under the Company's Senior Credit Facility, Second-Lien Facility and indentures governing the Company's senior unsecured notes. On June 30, 2004, the principal amount of indebtedness in default is approximately $1,651.4 million and the amount of accrued interest in default on the senior unsecured notes is approximately $36.1 million. Approximately $84.8 million of interest has not been accrued on the senior unsecured notes as a result of the Chapter 11 filing.
45
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION (Continued)
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
a.) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
10.1 |
|
Fourth Amendment to Post-Petition Credit Agreement dated May 21, 2004, among WestPoint Stevens Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries, the financial institutions named therein and Bank of America, N.A. and Wachovia Bank, National Association. | |
31.1 |
|
Chief Executive Officer's Section 302 Certification. | |
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Chief Financial Officer's Section 302 Certification. | |
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as signed by the Chief Executive Officer. | |
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as signed by the Chief Financial Officer. |
b.) Reports on Form 8-K
b.1.) |
|
The Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on April 26, 2004. The items reported were "Item 5. Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure." | |
|
|
||
b.2.) |
|
The Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on May 11, 2004. The items reported were "Item 5. Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure." | |
|
|
||
b.3.) |
|
The Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on June 1, 2004. The items reported were "Item 5. Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure." | |
46
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
WESTPOINT STEVENS INC. |
|
Registrant |
|
/s/ L. Dupuy Sears |
|
L. Dupuy Sears |
|
Senior Vice President-Finance |
|
And Chief Financial Officer |
|
Date: August 9, 2004
47