SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
|
|X| | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 OR |
| | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from _____________________ to _____________________ Commission file number 1-10258 Tredegar Corporation |
Virginia (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
54-1497771 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1100 Boulders Parkway Richmond, Virginia (Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
23225 (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (804) 330-1000 Indicate by check whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No | | Indicate by check whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes |X| No | | The number of shares of Common Stock, no par value, outstanding as of October 29, 2002: 38,419,925. |
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements. Tredegar Corporation |
Sept. 30, 2002 |
Dec. 31, 2001 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assets | |||||
Current assets: | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ 103,615 | $ 96,810 | |||
Accounts and notes receivable | 95,316 | 79,274 | |||
Income taxes recoverable | 4,178 | 5,410 | |||
Inventories | 39,472 | 45,316 | |||
Deferred income taxes | 18,632 | 16,022 | |||
Prepaid expenses and other | 5,780 | 2,880 | |||
Total current assets | 266,993 | 245,712 | |||
Property, plant and equipment, at cost | 518,598 | 534,491 | |||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | 264,948 | 267,148 | |||
Net property, plant and equipment | 253,650 | 267,343 | |||
Net non-current assets of Therics held for sale | 10,144 | | |||
Venture capital investments | 104,865 | 155,084 | |||
Other assets and deferred charges | 68,542 | 60,404 | |||
Goodwill and other intangibles | 131,964 | 136,488 | |||
Total assets | $ 836,158 | $ 865,031 | |||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity | |||||
Current liabilities: | |||||
Accounts payable | $ 42,126 | $ 46,507 | |||
Accrued expenses | 45,482 | 47,637 | |||
Current portion of long-term debt | 42,500 | 5,000 | |||
Total current liabilities | 130,108 | 99,144 | |||
Long-term debt | 216,665 | 259,498 | |||
Deferred income taxes | 17,747 | 18,985 | |||
Other noncurrent liabilities | 9,767 | 9,505 | |||
Total liabilities | 374,287 | 387,132 | |||
Shareholders equity: | |||||
Common stock, no par value | 109,055 | 107,104 | |||
Common stock held in trust for savings | |||||
restoration plan | (1,212 | ) | (1,212 | ) | |
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities | 562 | 8,314 | |||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | (7,995 | ) | (6,007 | ) | |
Loss on derivative financial instruments | (1,834 | ) | (2,708 | ) | |
Retained earnings | 363,295 | 372,408 | |||
Total shareholders equity | 461,871 | 477,899 | |||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity | $ 836,158 | $ 865,031 | |||
See accompanying notes to financial statements. 2 |
Tredegar Corporation |
Third Quarter Ended September 30 |
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||
Gross sales | $ 194,621 | $ 201,799 | $ 572,627 | $ 595,826 | |||||
Freight | 4,315 | 3,968 | 12,109 | 11,653 | |||||
Net sales | 190,306 | 197,831 | 560,518 | 584,173 | |||||
Other income (expense), net | (18,406 | ) | (4,151 | ) | (45,368 | ) | (7,839 | ) | |
Total | 171,900 | 193,680 | 515,150 | 576,334 | |||||
Costs and expenses: | |||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 152,328 | 160,473 | 443,696 | 475,854 | |||||
Selling, general and administrative | 13,298 | 12,454 | 41,102 | 38,134 | |||||
Research and development | 5,034 | 5,397 | 15,708 | 14,701 | |||||
Amortization of intangibles | 11 | 1,226 | 89 | 3,682 | |||||
Interest | 2,401 | 2,954 | 6,899 | 10,227 | |||||
Unusual items | 178 | 9,848 | 1,442 | 10,477 | |||||
Total | 173,250 | 192,352 | 508,936 | 553,075 | |||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before | |||||||||
income taxes | (1,350 | ) | 1,328 | 6,214 | 23,259 | ||||
Income taxes | (564 | ) | 413 | 1,999 | 6,279 | ||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | (786 | ) | 915 | 4,215 | 16,980 | ||||
Discontinued operations: | |||||||||
Loss from operations of Molecumetics (including | |||||||||
expected loss on disposal of $4,875 in 2002) | (975 | ) | (2,029 | ) | (8,728 | ) | (4,080 | ) | |
Income from discontinued energy segment | | | | 1,396 | |||||
Loss from discontinued operations | (975 | ) | (2,029 | ) | (8,728 | ) | (2,684 | ) | |
Net income (loss) | $ (1,761 | ) | $ (1,114 | ) | $ (4,513 | ) | $ 14,296 | ||
Earnings (loss) per share: | |||||||||
Basic: | |||||||||
Continuing operations | $ (.02 | ) | $ .02 | $ .11 | $ .45 | ||||
Discontinued operations | (.03 | ) | (.05 | ) | (.23 | ) | (.07 | ) | |
Net income (loss) | $ (.05 | ) | $ (.03 | ) | $ (.12 | ) | $ .38 | ||
Diluted: | |||||||||
Continuing operations | $ (.02 | ) | $ .02 | $ .11 | $ .44 | ||||
Discontinued operations | (.03 | ) | (.05 | ) | (.23 | ) | (.07 | ) | |
Net income (loss) | $ (.05 | ) | $ (.03 | ) | $ (.12 | ) | $ .37 | ||
Shares used to compute earnings (loss) per share: | |||||||||
Basic | 38,334 | 38,059 | 38,258 | 38,055 | |||||
Diluted | 38,334 | 38,838 | 38,935 | 38,824 | |||||
Dividends per share | $ .04 | $ .04 | $ .12 | $ .12 |
See accompanying notes to financial statements. 3 |
Tredegar Corporation |
Nine Months Ended September 30 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
2001 | ||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||
Net income (loss) | $ (4,513 | ) | $ 14,296 | ||
Adjustments for noncash items: | |||||
Loss (gain) from discontinued operations | 7,500 | (1,396 | ) | ||
Depreciation | 23,937 | 24,149 | |||
Amortization of intangibles | 89 | 3,682 | |||
Deferred income taxes | 1,092 | 521 | |||
Accrued pension income and postretirement benefits | (7,179 | ) | (7,740 | ) | |
Loss on venture capital investments | 45,998 | 8,976 | |||
Loss on equipment writedowns and divestitures | | 5,721 | |||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | | 298 | |||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | |||||
Accounts and notes receivable | (16,847 | ) | (6,613 | ) | |
Inventories | 5,617 | 2,883 | |||
Income taxes recoverable | 1,232 | (4,491 | ) | ||
Prepaid expenses and other | (679 | ) | (309 | ) | |
Accounts payable | (3,645 | ) | (392 | ) | |
Accrued expenses and income taxes payable | (5,764 | ) | 4,555 | ||
Other, net | (1,044 | ) | 1,465 | ||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 45,794 | 45,605 | |||
Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||
Capital expenditures | (21,564 | ) | (30,010 | ) | |
Venture capital investments | (14,579 | ) | (16,560 | ) | |
Proceeds from the sale of venture capital investments | 6,689 | 37,794 | |||
Proceeds from property disposals and divestitures | 143 | 2,224 | |||
Other, net | (1,696 | ) | (1,775 | ) | |
Net cash used in investing activities | (31,007 | ) | (8,327 | ) | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||
Dividends paid | (4,600 | ) | (4,569 | ) | |
Net (decrease) increase in borrowings | (5,333 | ) | (3,335 | ) | |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options (including | |||||
related income tax benefits realized) | 1,951 | 177 | |||
Net cash used in financing activities | (7,982 | ) | (7,727 | ) | |
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 6,805 | 29,551 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 96,810 | 44,530 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ 103,615 | $ 74,081 | |||
See accompanying notes to financial statements. 4 |
TREDEGAR
CORPORATION |
1. | In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Tredegar Corporation and Subsidiaries (Tredegar) contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly, in all material respects, Tredegars consolidated financial position as of September 30, 2002, and the consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001. All such adjustments are deemed to be of a normal recurring nature. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Tredegars Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. |
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. |
2. | The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued two new standards that primarily affect the accounting for acquisitions initiated after June 30, 2001, and the accounting for goodwill. We adopted these standards effective January 1, 2002. These standards prohibit amortization of goodwill but require annual impairment reviews that may result in the recognition of losses. We have reclassified from intangible assets to goodwill approximately $396,000 related to Therics workforce, which no longer qualifies as a separately identifiable intangible asset. We have made determinations as to what our reporting units are and what amounts of goodwill, intangible assets, other assets and liabilities should be allocated to those reporting units. We completed the transitional impairment test, which did not result in impairment of recorded goodwill. In accordance with this statement, amortization of goodwill was discontinued as of January 1, 2002. A reconciliation of previously reported net income and earnings per share to the amounts adjusted for the exclusion of goodwill amortization, net of related income taxes, is as follows: |
(In Thousands, except per share data) |
Quarter Ended Sept. 30, 2001 |
Nine Months Ended Sept. 30, 2001 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reported net income (loss) | $ (1,114 | ) | $ 14,296 | ||
Goodwill amortization, net of tax | 750 | 2,248 | |||
Adjusted net income (loss) | $ (364 | ) | $ 16,544 | ||
Basic earnings (loss) per share as reported | $ (.03 | ) | $ .38 | ||
Adjustment to basic earnings (loss) per share | .02 | .06 | |||
Adjusted basic earnings (loss) per share | $ (.01 | ) | $ .44 | ||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share as reported | $ (.03 | ) | $ .37 | ||
Adjustment to diluted earnings (loss) per share | .02 | .06 | |||
Adjusted diluted earnings (loss) per share | $ (.01 | ) | $ .43 | ||
5 |
The carrying value of goodwill at January 1, 2002, of $134.7 million was comprised of $100.7 million related to Film Products, $30.5 million related to Aluminum Extrusions and $3.5 million related to Therics. The goodwill related to Therics has been included in Net non-current assets of Therics held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2002. |
3. | See pages 16 through 18 for information on unusual items recognized during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001. |
On March 22, 2002, we announced our intent to divest our two biotechnology units, Molecumetics and Therics. The long-lived assets for Therics (approximately $10.1 million) have been separately classified in the accompanying balance sheet at September 30, 2002, as Net non-current assets of Therics held for sale and are no longer being depreciated. |
Operations at Molecumetics ceased on July 2, 2002, while efforts to sell its technology and tangible assets continue. The operating results of Molecumetics have been reported as discontinued operations and results for prior periods have been restated. Cash flows for Molecumetics have not been separately disclosed in the accompanying statement of cash flows. For the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, the operating losses for Molecumetics were $13.4 million and $6.3 million, respectively, while revenue was $515,000 and $3.5 million, respectively. Discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 include a third quarter charge of $1.5 million ($975,000 after taxes) and a second quarter charge of $6 million ($3.9 million after taxes) for the expected loss on the disposal of Molecumetics. The assets of Molecumetics (approximately $1.7 million), have been included in Prepaid expenses and other in the consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2002 and are no longer being depreciated. |
Discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 also include an after-tax gain of $1.4 million related to the reversal of an income tax contingency accrual upon favorable conclusion of IRS examinations through 1997. The accrual was originally recorded in conjunction with the sale of The Elk Horn Coal Corporation in 1994. |
4. | The components of inventories are as follows: |
(In Thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sept. 30, 2002 |
Dec. 31, 2001 |
||||
Finished goods | $ 7,166 | $ 8,407 | |||
Work-in-process | 3,848 | 4,560 | |||
Raw materials | 17,096 | 21,800 | |||
Stores, supplies and other | 11,362 | 10,549 | |||
Total | $39,472 | $45,316 | |||
6 |
5. | On October 15, 2002, we announced the retention of San Francisco-based Probitas Partners to explore alternatives aimed at maximizing the after-tax value of our venture capital investments. Several alternatives are being considered, including the sale of substantially all of the portfolio in a secondary market transaction. |
Recent transactions in the secondary market have been completed with significant discounts to reported fair value. The ultimate after-tax value of the portfolio under a hold strategy is uncertain. If Tredegar does not dispose of a substantial portion of its venture capital portfolio by the end of 2003, it will forego significant tax benefits that would be available on the carry-back of possible capital losses. After considering the reported capital gains and tax deductions taken on our final 2001 tax return filed on September 16, 2002, the net capital gains for tax purposes available for the carry-back of potential capital losses total $163 million, $158 million relating to 2000 and $5 million relating to 2001. The taxable capital gains generated in 2000 and 2001 are available for the carry-back of tax-related capital losses through 2003 and 2004, respectively. |
A summary of our venture capital activities for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, is provided below: |
(In Thousands) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Third Quarter Ended September 30 |
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||
Carrying value, beginning of period | $ 123,123 | $ 198,476 | $ 155,084 | $ 232,259 | |||||
Activity for period (pre-tax): | |||||||||
New investments | 3,442 | 7,452 | 14,579 | 16,560 | |||||
Proceeds from the sale of investments | (281 | ) | (9,740 | ) | (6,689 | ) | (37,982 | ) | |
Realized gains | 71 | 5,926 | 4,014 | 24,788 | |||||
Realized losses, write-offs and write-downs | (18,682 | ) | (10,041 | ) | (50,012 | ) | (33,764 | ) | |
Decrease in net unrealized gain | |||||||||
on available-for-sale securities | (2,808 | ) | (22,567 | ) | (12,111 | ) | (32,355 | ) | |
Carrying value, end of period | $ 104,865 | $ 169,506 | $ 104,865 | $ 169,506 | |||||
Our remaining unfunded commitments to private venture capital funds totaled approximately $30.6 million at September 30, 2002, and $36.7 million at December 31, 2001. |
A schedule of investments is provided on the following two pages. |
7 |
|
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tredegar Corporation Schedule of Investments at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 (In Thousands, Except Per-Share Amounts) |
Public Common Stock or Equivalents at 9/30/02 |
||||||||||||
Investment
|
Symbol
|
Yrs. Held (a) |
Description
|
Web Site (www.) |
Shares Held |
Closing Price |
|||||||
Securities of Public Companies Held: | |||||||||||||
Illumina, Inc. | ILMN | 3.9 | Fiber optic sensor technology for drug screening | illumina.com | 813 | $ 3.44 | |||||||
Adolor Corporation | ADLR | 3.8 | Develops pain-management therapeutic drugs | adolor.com | | | |||||||
Vascular Solutions | VASC | 4.8 | Vascular access site closure system | vascularsolutions.com | 861 | 0.90 | |||||||
SignalSoft Corporation | SGSF | 4.6 | Wireless caller location detection software | signalsoftcorp.com | | | |||||||
Photon Dynamics, Inc. (e) | PHTN | 4.3 | Test and repair systems for flat panel display industry | photondynamics.com | 3 | 18.63 | |||||||
Cisco Systems, Inc. (e) | CSCO | 3.2 | Worldwide leader in networking for the Internet | cisco.com | | | |||||||
Nortel Networks Corporation (e) | NT | 4.5 | Networking solutions and services | nortelnetworks.com | | | |||||||
CardioGenesis Corporation | CGCP | 8.3 | Coronary revascularization | eclipsesurg.com | | | |||||||
Openwave Systems, Inc. (e) | OPWV | 2.9 | Infrastructure applications for the Internet | openwave.com | | | |||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Total securities of public companies held | |||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Securities of Private Companies Held: | |||||||||||||
CryoGen | 7.0 | Micro-cryogenic catheters for medical applications | cryogen-inc.com | ||||||||||
Sensitech Inc. | 5.6 | Perishable product mgmt. solutions | sensitech.com | ||||||||||
Songbird Medical, Inc. | 5.2 | Disposable hearing aids | |||||||||||
Appliant, Inc. | 5.0 | Software tools for managing executable software | appliant.com | ||||||||||
HemoSense | 4.9 | Point of care blood coagulation time test device | hemosense.com | ||||||||||
Moai Technologies, Inc. | 4.8 | System for holding auctions on the Internet | moai.com | ||||||||||
Babycare, Ltd. | 4.6 | Direct retailing of baby care products in China | |||||||||||
NovaLux, Inc. | 4.4 | Blue-green light lasers | novalux.com | ||||||||||
Xcyte Therapies, Inc. | 4.2 | Develops drugs to treat cancer & other disorders | xcytetherapies.com | ||||||||||
Advanced Diagnostics, Inc. | 3.9 | 3-D medical imaging equipment | |||||||||||
EndoVasix, Inc. | 3.7 | Device for treatment of ischemic strokes | endovasix.com | ||||||||||
eWireless, inc | 3.7 | Technology linking cell phone users & advertising | ewireless.com | ||||||||||
Cooking.com, Inc. | 3.5 | Sales of cooking-related items over the Internet | cooking.com | ||||||||||
MediaFlex.com | 3.5 | Internet-based printing & publishing | mediaflex.com | ||||||||||
eBabyCare Ltd. | 3.3 | Sales of babycare products over the Internet in China | |||||||||||
Kodiak Technologies, Inc. | 3.3 | Cooling products for organ & pharma transport | kodiaktech.com | ||||||||||
Artemis Medical, Inc. | 3.2 | Medical devices for breast cancer surgery | |||||||||||
CEPTYR, Inc. | 3.2 | Develops small molecule drugs | ceptyr.com | ||||||||||
ThinkFree.com | 3.0 | Java-based software complementary to Microsoft Office | thinkfree.com | ||||||||||
BroadRiver Communications | 2.9 | Local DSL provider | purepacket.com | ||||||||||
Quarry Technologies, Inc. | 2.9 | Technology for delivery of differentiated service levels | quarrytech.com | ||||||||||
FastTrack Systems, Inc. | 2.7 | Clinical trial data management information systems | |||||||||||
Riveon, Inc. | 2.6 | Web-based data mining software for business managers | |||||||||||
MedManage Systems Inc. | 2.5 | Management of prescription drug sampling programs | medmanagesystems.com | ||||||||||
Infinicon, Inc. | 2.3 | Manufacturer of infiniband input/output products | infiniconsys.com | ||||||||||
Cbyon, Inc. | 2.2 | Provider of software image data to assist surgeons | cbyon.com | ||||||||||
Extreme Devices | 2.0 | Manufacturer of integrated, solid-state electron source | |||||||||||
Locus Discovery, Inc. | 1.9 | Computational chemogenomics technology | locusdiscovery.com | ||||||||||
eTunnels Inc. | 1.8 | VPNs across all ISPs and companies | etunnels.com | ||||||||||
Elixir | 1.8 | Evaluation technology for anti-aging compounds | |||||||||||
|
Total securities of private companies held | |||||||||||||
Limited partnership interests in private venture capital funds (period held of .2 - 10.0 years) (d) | |||||||||||||
Total investments | |||||||||||||
Estimated tax cost (benefit) on assumed disposal at fair value | |||||||||||||
Estimated net asset value (NAV) | |||||||||||||
Public Common Stock or Equivalents at 9/30/02 |
9/30/02 (f) |
12/31/01 (f) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investment |
Estimated Restricted Stock Dis- count (c) |
Estimated Fair Value (b) |
Carrying Value (b) |
Cost Basis |
Estimated Fair Value (b) |
Carrying Value (b) |
Cost Basis | ||||||||
Securities of Public Companies Held: | |||||||||||||||
Illumina, Inc. | 0 | % | $ 2,798 | $ 2,798 | $ 1,933 | $ 10,749 | $ 10,749 | $ 2,173 | |||||||
Adolor Corporation | 0 | % | | | | 3,704 | 3,704 | 844 | |||||||
Vascular Solutions | 0 | % | 775 | 775 | 2,429 | 2,401 | 2,401 | 2,429 | |||||||
SignalSoft Corporation | 0 | % | | | | 1,835 | 1,835 | 1,330 | |||||||
Photon Dynamics, Inc. (e) | 20 | % | 41 | 41 | 940 | 763 | 387 | 940 | |||||||
Cisco Systems, Inc. (e) | 0 | % | | | | 245 | 245 | 200 | |||||||
Nortel Networks Corporation (e) | 0 | % | | | | 151 | 148 | 117 | |||||||
CardioGenesis Corporation | 0 | % | | | | 132 | 132 | 616 | |||||||
Openwave Systems, Inc. (e) | 0 | % | | | | 14 | 14 | 7 | |||||||
Total securities of public companies held | 3,614 | 3,614 | 5,302 | 19,994 | 19,615 | 8,656 | |||||||||
Securities of Private Companies Held: | |||||||||||||||
CryoGen | 2,339 | 2,339 | 3,910 | 2,339 | 2,339 | 3,910 | |||||||||
Sensitech Inc. | 3,197 | 2,333 | 2,333 | 3,197 | 2,333 | 2,333 | |||||||||
Songbird Medical, Inc. | 1,548 | 1,548 | 5,582 | 3,303 | 3,303 | 5,215 | |||||||||
Appliant, Inc. | | | 3,899 | 6,439 | 3,899 | 3,899 | |||||||||
HemoSense | 2,771 | 2,485 | 2,485 | 2,771 | 2,485 | 2,485 | |||||||||
Moai Technologies, Inc. | | | 2,021 | | | 2,021 | |||||||||
Babycare, Ltd. | 851 | | 1,009 | | | 1,009 | |||||||||
NovaLux, Inc. | 2,618 | 2,618 | 10,149 | 10,149 | 10,149 | 10,149 | |||||||||
Xcyte Therapies, Inc. | 4,634 | 4,634 | 4,634 | 4,634 | 4,634 | 4,634 | |||||||||
Advanced Diagnostics, Inc. | | | 2,621 | 2,137 | 2,121 | 2,121 | |||||||||
EndoVasix, Inc. | 842 | 842 | 4,189 | 800 | 800 | 4,000 | |||||||||
eWireless, inc | | | 2,250 | | | 2,250 | |||||||||
Cooking.com, Inc. | 974 | 974 | 4,500 | 1,500 | 1,500 | 4,500 | |||||||||
MediaFlex.com | | | 3,500 | | | 3,500 | |||||||||
eBabyCare Ltd. | | | 314 | | | 314 | |||||||||
Kodiak Technologies, Inc. | | | 2,507 | 2,202 | 2,202 | 2,202 | |||||||||
Artemis Medical, Inc. | 2,762 | 2,762 | 3,348 | 3,267 | 2,467 | 2,467 | |||||||||
CEPTYR, Inc. | 656 | 656 | 1,750 | 1,750 | 1,750 | 1,750 | |||||||||
ThinkFree.com | 339 | 339 | 1,491 | 741 | 741 | 1,491 | |||||||||
BroadRiver Communications | | | 4,779 | | | 4,779 | |||||||||
Quarry Technologies, Inc. | 2,865 | 2,865 | 4,343 | 2,567 | 2,567 | 4,046 | |||||||||
FastTrack Systems, Inc. | 7,182 | 5,479 | 5,479 | 7,182 | 5,479 | 5,479 | |||||||||
Riveon, Inc. | | | 1,990 | | | 1,990 | |||||||||
MedManage Systems Inc. | 3,049 | 3,049 | 6,095 | 5,200 | 5,200 | 5,200 | |||||||||
Infinicon, Inc. | 6,985 | 6,985 | 6,985 | 4,573 | 4,573 | 4,573 | |||||||||
Cbyon, Inc. | 2,118 | 2,118 | 5,000 | 4,178 | 4,178 | 4,178 | |||||||||
Extreme Devices | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | |||||||||
Locus Discovery, Inc. | 6,334 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 6,333 | 4,000 | 4,000 | |||||||||
eTunnels Inc. | | | 4,641 | 3,748 | 3,748 | 3,748 | |||||||||
Elixir | 2,827 | 2,827 | 2,827 | 2,827 | 2,827 | 2,827 | |||||||||
Total securities of private companies held | 59,891 | 53,853 | 113,631 | 86,837 | 78,295 | 106,070 | |||||||||
Limited partnership interests in private venture capital funds (period held of .2 - 10.0 years) (d) | 50,355 | 47,398 | 75,373 | 64,889 | 57,174 | 75,247 | |||||||||
Total investments | 113,860 | $104,865 | $194,306 | 171,720 | $155,084 | $189,973 | |||||||||
Estimated tax cost (benefit) on assumed disposal at fair value | (28,960 | ) | (6,571 | ) | |||||||||||
Estimated net asset value (NAV) | $ 142,820 | $ 178,291 | |||||||||||||
See notes on page 9. 8 |
Tredegar Corporation Notes: (a) The period held for an investment in a company or a venture capital fund is computed using the initial investment date and the current valuation date. If a company has merged with another company, then the initial investment date is the date of the investment in the predecessor company. (b) Amounts are shown net of carried interest estimated using realized and unrealized net gains to date. Amounts may change due to changes in estimated carried interest, and such changes are not expected to be material. Carried interest is the portion of value payable to portfolio managers based on realized net gains and is a customary incentive in the venture capital industry. (c) Restricted securities are securities for which an agreement exists not to sell shares for a specified period of time, usually 180 days. Also included within the category of restricted securities are unregistered securities, the sale of which must comply with an exemption to the Securities Act of 1933 (usually SEC Rule 144). These unregistered securities are either the same class of stock that is registered and publicly traded or are convertible into a class of stock that is registered and publicly traded. (d) At September 30, 2002, Tredegar had ownership interests in 29 venture capital funds, including an indirect interest in the following public companies, among others (disposition of shares held by venture funds, including distributions to limited partners, is at the sole discretion of the general partner of the fund): |
Indirect Interest |
Average | Indirect | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Indirect Investment | Symbol | Description | in Common Shares |
Closing Price |
Restricted Stock Dis- count |
Estimated Fair Value |
Cost Basis |
|||||||||
Illumina, Inc. | ILMN | Fiber optic sensor technology for drug screening (illumina.com) | 215 | $ 3.44 | 20 | % | $590 | $333 | ||||||||
Adolor Corporation | ADLR | Develops pain-management therapeutic drugs (adolor.com) | 86 | 14.02 | 20 | % | 965 | 411 | ||||||||
Array Biopharma | ARRY | Drug discovery research using innovative chemistry (arraybiophar.com) | 98 | 7.79 | 20 | % | 609 | 240 | ||||||||
Seattle Genetics | SGEN | Biopharmaceuticals for treatment of cancers (seattlegenetics.com) | 70 | 3.22 | 20 | % | 182 | 136 | ||||||||
(e) | Public company stock received from the acquisition of a private company in the portfolio. |
(f) | Our portfolio is subject to risks typically associated with investments in technology start-up companies, which include business failure, illiquidity and stock market volatility. |
9 |
6. | Comprehensive income (loss), defined as net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss), was a loss of $6.5 million for the third quarter of 2002 and a loss of $17.5 million for the third quarter of 2001. Comprehensive income (loss) was a loss of $13.4 million for the first nine months of 2002 and a loss of $8.4 million for the first nine months of 2001. Other comprehensive income (loss) includes changes in unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on derivative financial instruments recorded net of deferred income taxes directly in shareholders equity. |
7. | Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average common and potentially dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding, determined as follows: |
(In Thousands) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Third Quarter Ended September 30 |
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding used | |||||||||
to compute basic earnings per share | 38,334 | 38,059 | 38,258 | 38,055 | |||||
Incremental shares issuable upon the | |||||||||
assumed exercise of stock options | | 779 | 677 | 769 | |||||
Shares used to compute diluted earnings | |||||||||
per share | 38,334 | 38,838 | 38,935 | 38,824 | |||||
Incremental shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of outstanding stock options are computed using the average market price during the related period. No incremental shares were assumed issued in the third quarter of 2002 due to their anti-dilutive effect on the loss per share recognized for the period. |
Earnings per share for the third quarter of 2001 have been restated to give effect to the treatment of Molecumetics as discontinued operations. Previously, no incremental shares were assumed issued in the third quarter of 2001 due to their anti-dilutive effect on the loss per share recognized for the period. However, with the restatement for the discontinued operations, there was income from continuing operations and thus incremental shares were assumed issued during the third quarter of 2001. There was no impact on the previously reported amounts of basic and diluted earnings per share for this change. |
8. | Pursuant to our stock option plans, 604,500 and 16,000 stock options were granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively and 10,000 and 16,000 stock options were granted during the quarters ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The stock options were granted to officers, management and other employees. |
We account for the fair value of stock options granted to employees and directors in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized since the exercise price of the options was equal to the fair value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Had compensation cost for our stock-based compensation plans been determined based on the fair value of the options at the grant dates consistent with the method of accounting under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, our income and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below: |
10 |
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(In Thousands, except per share data) | 2002 | 2001 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations: | |||||||||||||
As reported | $ (786 | ) | $ 915 | $ 4,215 | $ 16,980 | ||||||||
Pro forma | (1,340 | ) | 319 | 2,555 | 15,191 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from | |||||||||||||
continuing operations: | |||||||||||||
As reported | (.02 | ) | .02 | .11 | .44 | ||||||||
Pro forma | (.03 | ) | .01 | .07 | .39 | ||||||||
For the purposes of the above presentation, the fair value of each option was estimated as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The weighted-average assumptions used in this model are provided below: |
2002 | 2001 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dividend yield | .85 | % | .80 | % | |
Volatility percentage | 45.0 | % | 45.0 | % | |
Weighted average risk-free interest rate | 4.65 | % | 4.2 | % | |
Holding period (years): | |||||
Officers | 7.0 | n/a | |||
Management | 5.0 | 5.0 | |||
Other employees | 3.0 | n/a | |||
Weighted average market price at date of grant: | |||||
Officers and management | $18.88 | $19.96 | |||
Other employees | $18.90 | n/a | |||
The estimated weighted-average fair value of options per share at the date of grant was $8.09 in 2002 and $8.42 per share in 2001. |
9. | Our effective tax rate from continuing operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, was 42% versus 31% for the same quarter of the prior year. The increase is due to the amount of non-deductible expenses relative to the pretax loss. The effective income tax rate from manufacturing operations, excluding unusual items, was 35.5% in both periods. |
Our effective tax rate from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, was 32% compared with 27% for the same period of the prior year. The prior year effective tax rate from continuing operations was low due primarily to the $1.9 million tax benefit related to the reversal of income tax contingency accruals upon favorable conclusion of IRS examinations through 1997. The effective income tax rate from manufacturing operations, excluding unusual items, was 35.5% in both periods. |
10. | On April 30, 2002, we completed a $100 million 364-day revolving credit facility and terminated our $275 million revolver that would have matured in July 2002. The new facility has covenants and restrictions consistent with our existing debt; the most restrictive of which is a debt-to-capitalization limitation of 50%. At September 30, 2002, this ratio was 36%. The new facility provides for interest to be charged at a base rate (generally the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR)) plus a spread that is dependent upon our quarterly debt-to-capitalization ratio. The fully-borrowed spread over LIBOR charged at the various debt-to-capitalization levels is as follows: |
11 |
Credit Spread Under $100 Million 364-Day Revolving Credit Facility |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Debt-to-Total Capitalization Ratio |
Fully-Borrowed Spread Over LIBOR (Basis Points) | ||
40% and = 50% | 125.0 | ||
30% and = 40% | 100.0 | ||
= 30% | 75.0 | ||
This short-term facility is an interim step to longer-term financing that we plan to initiate once the divestitures of Molecumetics and Therics have been completed. |
11. | In August 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143 (SFAS 143), Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. SFAS 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and related asset retirement costs. SFAS 143 is effective for financial statements with fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002, and is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements. |
In June 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146 (SFAS 146), Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. SFAS 146 addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring). Under EITF Issue 94-3, a liability for an exit activity was recognized at the date of an entitys commitment to an exit plan. SFAS 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. SFAS 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002, and is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements. |
12 |
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Critical Accounting Policies In the ordinary course of business, we make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial position in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. We believe the following discussion addresses our most critical accounting policies, which are those that require managements most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Investments We have investments in private venture capital fund limited partnerships and early-stage technology companies, including the stock of privately held companies and the restricted and unrestricted stock of companies that have recently registered shares in initial public offerings. These investments individually represent voting ownership interests of less than 20%. We write down or write off an investment and recognize a loss when events indicate there is impairment in the investment that is other than temporary. For private securities and ownership interests in private venture capital funds, impairment is deemed to exist when the estimated fair value at quarterly valuation dates is below carrying value. For available-for-sale securities, impairment is deemed to exist if analyst reports or other information on the company in which we have invested indicates that recovery of value above cost basis is unlikely within several quarters. The fair value of securities of public companies is determined based on closing price quotations, subject to estimated restricted stock discounts. We estimate the fair value of securities of private companies using purchase cost, prices of recent significant private placements of securities of the same issuer, changes in financial condition and prospects of the issuer, and estimates of liquidation value. The fair value of ownership interests in private venture capital funds is based on our estimate of our distributable share of fund net assets using, among other information: |
| The general partners estimate of the fair value of non-marketable securities held by the funds (which is usually the indicative value from the latest round of financing or a reduced amount if events subsequent to the financing imply a lower valuation); |
| Closing bid prices of publicly traded securities held by the funds, subject to estimated restricted stock discounts; and |
| Fund formulas for allocating profits, losses and distributions. |
Because of the inherent uncertainty associated with the valuations of restricted securities or securities for which there is no public market, estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the securities existed. The portfolio is subject to risks typically associated with investments in technology start-up companies, which include business failure, illiquidity and stock market volatility. Furthermore, publicly traded stocks of emerging, technology-based companies usually have higher volatility and risk than the U.S. stock market as a whole. See also Note 5 on page 7 regarding our exploration of alternatives aimed at maximizing the after-tax value of our venture capital investments. 13 |
Impairment of Long-lived Identifiable Assets We regularly assess our long-lived assets for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable from future cash flows. Any necessary impairment charges are recorded when we do not believe the carrying value of the long-lived asset will be recoverable. Assets to be disposed of, including assets held for sale, are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or estimated fair value less cost to sell, with an impairment loss recognized for any write-downs required. Impairment of Goodwill We regularly assess goodwill for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable, or, at a minimum, on an annual basis. We compare the fair value of our reporting units to their carrying amounts. If the carrying amounts of the reporting units exceed their fair values, the deficiency identified with goodwill is recognized as an impairment charge. Pension Benefits We have noncontributory and contributory defined benefit (pension) plans covering most employees. Several statistical and other factors that attempt to anticipate future events are used in calculating the net benefit income or cost and benefit obligations related to the plans. These factors include assumptions about the discount rate, expected return on plan assets and rate of future compensation increases, as determined within certain guidelines. In addition, our actuarial consultants use subjective factors such as withdrawal and mortality rates to estimate the projected benefit obligation. The actuarial assumptions may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates or longer or shorter life spans of participants. These differences may result in a significant impact to the amount of net pension income or expense recorded in future periods. Results of Operations Third Quarter 2002 Compared with Third Quarter 2001 The net loss for the third quarter of 2002 was $1.8 million compared with a net loss of $1.1 million in 2001. The net loss from continuing operations was $786,000 (2 cents per share) compared with net income of $915,000 (2 cents per share) in 2001. Results in the third quarter of 2002 include $12.7 million of net after-tax losses from venture capital investments compared with net after-tax losses of $3.6 million in the prior year. Excluding unusual items, income from manufacturing operations was $14.2 million versus $13.2 million in 2001. Last years results include goodwill amortization expense of $750,000 after taxes. Fourth-quarter results from manufacturing operations are expected to approximate year-ago levels. Looking ahead to the first half of 2003, we expect manufacturing income to trail 2002 results due mainly to lower profits in Film Products, where an accelerating decline in diaper backsheet profits is likely to outpace growth from new products. The resulting income shortfall could widen if market conditions in Aluminum Extrusions do not improve. 14 |
On March 22, 2002, we announced our intent to divest our two biotechnology units, Molecumetics and Therics. Efforts to sell Therics are under way as it continues to progress in its technology development efforts. We have retained Adams, Harkness and Hill, a Boston-based investment-banking firm to manage the divestiture process. Therics had net losses of $2.2 million in the third quarter of 2002 and $2.4 million in 2001 (6 cents per share in each period). The long-lived assets for Therics (approximately $10.1 million) have been separately classified in the accompanying balance sheet at September 30, 2002, as Net non-current assets of Therics held for sale and are no longer being depreciated. Operations at Molecumetics ceased on July 2, 2002, while efforts to sell its technology and tangible assets continue. The operating results of Molecumetics have been reported as discontinued operations. The net loss from discontinued operations of Molecumetics for the third quarter of 2002 was $975,000 (3 cents per share) versus $2 million (5 cents per share) in 2001. The loss for the third quarter of 2002 represents employee-related costs related to the closure of the facility. The long-lived assets of Molecumetics (approximately $1.7 million) have been included in Prepaid expenses and other in the consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2002, and are no longer being depreciated. Pre-tax gains and losses from venture capital investment activities are included in Other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of income on page 3 and Venture capital investments in the operating profit table on page 20. Operating expenses (primarily management fee expenses) for our venture capital investment activities are classified in Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) in the consolidated statements of income and Venture capital investments in the operating profit table. After-tax depreciation in the net asset value (NAV) of the venture capital investment portfolio during the third quarter was $15.4 million. At September 30, 2002, the NAV of the portfolio was $142.8 million. On October 15, 2002, we announced that we have retained San Francisco-based Probitas Partners to explore alternatives aimed at maximizing the after-tax value of our venture capital investments. Several alternatives are being considered including the sale of substantially all of the portfolio in a secondary market transaction. For more information on our venture capital investment activities, see pages 21 to 23 and Note 5 on pages 7 to 9. Net sales in the third quarter of 2002 were $190.3 million compared with $197.8 million in the prior year, down 4%. Net sales in Film Products were down 5% while sales in Aluminum Extrusions declined 3%. Volume in Film Products was down 8% while volume in Aluminum Extrusions declined 3%. For more information on net sales, see the business segment review beginning on page 20. The gross profit margin during the third quarter increased to 20% from 18.9% in 2001. The higher profit margin was driven mainly by an increase in Film Products due to improved product and customer mix as well as increased operating efficiencies. The gross profit margin in Aluminum Extrusions was up slightly despite continued pressure on both volume and price. SG&A expenses in the third quarter were $13.3 million, up from $12.5 million in 2001 due primarily to increased expenses at Film Products in support of additional sales and marketing efforts. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses were 7% in the third quarter of 2002 compared with 6.3% in 2001. 15 |
R&D expenses were down 6.7% from $5.4 million in 2001 to $5 million in 2002 due primarily to decreased spending at Therics. Unusual items in 2002 totaled $178,000 ($114,000 after income taxes) and were primarily for relocation and employee-related costs related to the shutdown of the films plant in Carbondale, Pennsylvania. Unusual items in the third quarter of 2001 totaled $9.8 million ($6.3 million after income taxes) and included: |
| a charge of $6.8 million ($4.4 million after income taxes) for the shutdown of the aluminum extrusions plant in El Campo, Texas, including an impairment loss for building and equipment ($4.5 million), severance costs ($710,000), excess working capital ($890,000) and other items ($700,000); and |
| a charge of $3 million ($1.9 million after income taxes) for the shutdown of the films manufacturing facility in Tacoma, Washington, including an impairment loss for equipment ($1.2 million), dismantling of equipment and restoration of the leased space ($700,000), excess working capital ($650,000) and other items ($450,000). |
Interest income, which is included in Other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of income, was $448,000 in 2002 and $717,000 in 2001. Despite higher average cash and cash equivalents during the quarter ($100.9 million in 2002 versus $78 million in 2001), interest income was down due to a lower average tax-equivalent yield earned on cash and cash equivalents (approximately 1.8% in the third quarter of 2002 and approximately 3.6% in 2001). Our policy permits investment of excess cash in marketable securities that have the highest credit ratings and maturities of less than one year. The primary objectives of our policy are safety of principal and liquidity. Interest expense was $2.4 million compared with $3 million in 2001. Average debt outstanding and interest rates for the quarters were as follows: |
Third Quarter Ended September 30, |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(In Millions) | 2002 | 2001 | ||||
Floating-rate debt with interest charged on a | ||||||
rollover basis at one-month LIBOR: | ||||||
Average outstanding debt balance | $175.0 | $175.0 | ||||
Average interest rate | 2.5 | % | 4.4 | % | ||
Floating-rate debt fixed via interest rate swaps in the | ||||||
second quarter of 2001 and maturing in the second | ||||||
quarter of 2003: | ||||||
Average outstanding debt balance | $ 75.0 | $ 75.0 | ||||
Average interest rate | 4.8 | % | 4.8 | % | ||
Fixed-rate and other debt: | ||||||
Average outstanding debt balance | $ 9.3 | $ 14.7 | ||||
Average interest rate | 7.2 | % | 7.2 | % | ||
Total debt: | ||||||
Average outstanding debt balance | $259.3 | $264.7 | ||||
Average interest rate | 3.4 | % | 4.5 | % | ||
16 |
Our effective income tax rate from continuing operations was 42% compared with 31% in the prior year. The increase is due to the amount of non-deductible expenses relative to the pretax loss. The effective income tax rate from manufacturing operations, excluding unusual items, was 35.5% in both periods. Nine Months 2002 Compared with Nine Months 2001 The net loss for the first nine months of 2002 was $4.5 million compared with net income of $14.3 million in 2001. Net income from continuing operations was $4.2 million in 2002, down from $17 million in 2001 (11 cents per share versus 45 cents per share). Results for 2002 include $32.1 million (82 cents per share) of after-tax losses from venture capital investments compared to $8.8 million (23 cents per share) in 2001. Results in 2001 include an after-tax gain of $2.5 million (7 cents per share) related to the reversal of income tax contingency accruals and related interest received on tax overpayments upon favorable conclusion of certain IRS examinations. Results in 2001 also include goodwill amortization expense of $2.2 million after taxes or 6 cents per share. Results for 2002 include net losses from discontinued operations of Molecumetics of $8.7 million versus $4.1 million in 2001. In addition to the operating losses, discontinued operations in 2002 include an expected loss on the disposal of Molecumetics of $7.5 million ($4.9 million after taxes) comprised of an impairment loss for equipment of $4 million, employee related costs of $1.5 million and estimated miscellaneous disposal costs of $2 million. Discontinued operations in 2001 also include an after-tax gain of $1.4 million related to the reversal of an income tax contingency accrual upon favorable conclusion of IRS examinations through 1997. The accrual was originally recorded in conjunction with the sale of The Elk Horn Coal Corporation in 1994. The after-tax depreciation in the NAV through the first nine months of this year was $44.7 million. Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, decreased by 4% compared with the same period of last year. Net sales in Film Products were down 2% and net sales in Aluminum Extrusions were down 6%. For more information on net sales, see the business segment review beginning on page 20. The gross profit margin for the first nine months of 2002 increased to 20.8% from 18.5% in 2001 primarily due to increased profit in Film Products due to improved product and customer mix. SG&A expenses were $41.1 million in 2002 compared with $38.1 million in 2001. The increase is primarily due to higher expenses in Film Products in support of additional sales and marketing efforts. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses increased to 7.3% in the first nine months of 2002 compared with 6.5% in the same period of 2001. R&D expenses increased to $15.7 million in 2002 from $14.7 million in 2001 due to higher spending at Therics (up $370,000) and higher spending at Film Products (up $630,000). 17 |
Unusual items for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, totaled approximately $1.4 million ($923,000 after income taxes or 2 cents per share) and included: |
| a pretax charge of $282,000 primarily for relocation and employee-related costs related to the shutdown of a films manufacturing facility in Tacoma, Washington; |
| a pretax charge of $991,000 for severance and other employee-related costs related to the shutdown of a films manufacturing facility in Carbondale, Pennsylvania; and |
| a pretax charge of $169,000 for costs incurred in the transfer of business related to the shutdown of an aluminum plant in El Campo, Texas. |
Unusual items for the nine months ended September 30, 2001, totaled $10.5 million ($4.8 million after income taxes or 12 cents per share) and included: |
| a pretax charge of $6.8 million ($4.4 million after income taxes) for the shutdown of the aluminum extrusions plant in El Campo, Texas, including an impairment loss for building and equipment ($4.5 million), severance costs ($710,000), excess working capital ($890,000) and other items ($700,000); |
| a pretax charge of $3 million ($1.9 million after income taxes) for the shutdown of the films manufacturing facility in Tacoma, Washington, including an impairment loss for equipment ($1.2 million), dismantling of equipment and restoration of the leased space ($700,000), excess working capital ($650,000) and other items ($450,000); |
| a pretax charge of $1.6 million ($1 million after income taxes) for further rationalization in the plastic films business; and |
| a pretax gain of $1 million ($621,000 after income taxes) for interest received on tax overpayments upon favorable conclusion of IRS examinations through 1997 (included in Corporate expenses, net in the net sales and operating profit by segment table). |
Income taxes in 2001 include an income tax benefit of $1.9 million related to the reversal of income tax contingency accruals upon favorable conclusion of IRS examinations through 1997 (included in Income taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Income). Interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, was $1.5 million versus $2.1 million for the same period in 2001. Despite higher average cash and cash equivalents during the period ($99.7 million in 2002 versus $65 million in 2001), interest income was down due to lower average tax-equivalent yield earned on cash equivalents (approximately 2% in 2002 and 4.5% in 2001). Interest expense decreased to $6.9 million in 2002 from $10.2 million in 2001. Average debt outstanding and interest rates were as follows: 18 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(In Millions) | 2002 | 2001 | |||
Floating-rate debt with interest charged on a | |||||
rollover basis at one-month LIBOR: | |||||
Average outstanding debt balance | $175.0 | $225.0 | |||
Average interest rate | 2.5 | % | 5.4 | % | |
Floating-rate debt fixed via interest rate swaps in the | |||||
second quarter of 2001 and maturing in the second | |||||
quarter of 2003: | |||||
Average outstanding debt balance | $ 75.0 | $ 25.0 | |||
Average interest rate | 4.8 | % | 4.8 | % | |
Fixed-rate and other debt: | |||||
Average outstanding debt balance | $ 12.5 | $ 17.4 | |||
Average interest rate | 7.2 | % | 7.2 | % | |
Total debt: | |||||
Average outstanding debt balance | $262.5 | $267.4 | |||
Average interest rate | 3.5 | % | 5.5 | % | |
The effective income tax rate from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, was 32.2% compared with 27% in the prior year. The prior year rate was low due to the impact of the $1.9 million tax benefit related to the reversal of income tax contingency accruals upon favorable conclusion of IRS examinations. The effective income tax rate from manufacturing operations, excluding unusual items, was 35.5% in both periods. 19 |
Business Segment Review The following tables present Tredegars net sales and operating profit by segment for the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001. Net Sales by
Segment |
Third Quarter Ended September 30 |
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||
Film Products | $ 94,473 | $ 99,016 | $280,667 | $286,589 | |||||
Aluminum Extrusions | 95,813 | 98,722 | 279,643 | 297,228 | |||||
Therics | 20 | 93 | 208 | 356 | |||||
Total net sales | $190,306 | $197,831 | $560,518 | $584,173 | |||||
Operating Profit by
Segment |
Third Quarter Ended September 30 |
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||
Film Products: | |||||||||
Ongoing operations | $ 16,645 | $ 16,107 | $ 53,442 | $ 44,073 | |||||
Unusual items | (178 | ) | (3,000 | ) | (1,273 | ) | (4,600 | ) | |
Total Film Products | 16,467 | 13,107 | 52,169 | 39,473 | |||||
Aluminum Extrusions: | |||||||||
Ongoing operations | 8,107 | 7,191 | 23,737 | 23,743 | |||||
Unusual items | | (6,848 | ) | (169 | ) | (6,848 | ) | ||
Total Aluminum Extrusions | 8,107 | 343 | 23,568 | 16,895 | |||||
Therics | (3,263 | ) | (3,602 | ) | (10,090 | ) | (9,170 | ) | |
Tredegar Investments | (19,883 | ) | (5,622 | ) | (50,084 | ) | (13,693 | ) | |
Total operating profit | 1,428 | 4,226 | 15,563 | 33,505 | |||||
Interest income | 448 | 717 | 1,498 | 2,131 | |||||
Interest expense | 2,401 | 2,954 | 6,899 | 10,227 | |||||
Corporate expenses, net | 825 | 661 | 3,948 | 2,150 | |||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | |||||||||
before income taxes | (1,350 | ) | 1,328 | 6,214 | 23,259 | ||||
Income taxes | (564 | ) | 413 | 1,999 | 6,279 | ||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | (786 | ) | 915 | 4,215 | 16,980 | ||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | (975 | ) | (2,029 | ) | (8,728 | ) | (2,684 | ) | |
Net (loss) income | $(1,761 | ) | $(1,114 | ) | $(4,513 | ) | $ 14,296 | ||
20 |
Third-quarter net sales in Film Products decreased 5% to $94.5 million while operating profit, excluding unusual items, increased from $16.1 million to $16.6 million. On a year-to-date basis, sales in Film Products fell to $280.7 million from $286.6 million while operating profit, excluding unusual items, was $53.4 million, up 21%. Excluding the impact of goodwill amortization expense in the prior year, operating profit was down 2% for the quarter and up 14% for the first nine months. The decline in sales for the quarter was driven by a decrease in volume of approximately 8%. This decline was offset in part by an increase in selling prices, (approximately 4%) which are heavily influenced by raw material costs. On a year-to-date basis, the improved results were driven by higher sales of new products combined with a temporary slowdown in the ongoing decline in sales of domestic backsheet products during the fist half of 2002. The rate of decline in sales of domestic backsheet products is expected to accelerate as we move into 2003 and we do not expect to generate sufficient growth from new products to offset this accelerating decline in the near term. In Aluminum Extrusions, third-quarter sales were down 3% to $95.8 million while operating profit, excluding unusual items, was up from $7.2 million to $8.1 million. On a year-to-date basis, sales declined 6% to $279.6 million while operating profit was flat at $23.7 million. Sales were negatively impacted by continued pressure on volume. Selling prices, which are greatly influenced by metal costs, were relatively flat. The negative impact of the decline in volume was more than offset by lower conversion costs, which were helped by the shutdown of our plant in El Campo, Texas. On March 22, 2002, we announced our intent to divest our two biotechnology units, Molecumetics and Therics. Efforts to sell Therics are under way as it continues to progress in its technology development efforts. For Therics, revenue was down for both the quarter and the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared with the same periods of the prior year. The third-quarter operating loss was $3.3 million versus $3.6 million in 2001. On a year-to-date basis, the operating loss was $10.1 million versus $9.2 million in 2001. Operations of Molecumetics were ceased on July 2, 2002, while efforts to sell its technology and tangible assets continue. The results of Molecumetics have been reported as discontinued operations and results for prior periods have been restated. The net loss for the third quarter of 2002 was $975,000 (3 cents per share) versus $2 million (5 cents per share) in 2001. The loss for the third quarter of 2002 represents employee-related costs related to the closure of the facility. On a year-to-date basis, the net loss was $8.7 million versus $4.1 million in 2001. In addition to the operating losses, discontinued operations in 2002 include an expected loss on the disposal of Molecumetics of $7.5 million ($4.9 million after taxes) comprised of an impairment loss for equipment of $4 million, employee-related costs of $1.5 million for forty-five employees and estimated miscellaneous disposal costs of $2 million. See Note 5 on page 7 regarding our exploration of alternatives aimed at maximizing the after-tax value of our venture capital investments. The depreciation in NAV related to venture capital investment activities for the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 is summarized below: 21 |
(In Millions) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Third Quarter Ended September 30 |
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||
Net realized gains, losses, write-downs and | |||||||||
related operating expenses for venture capital | |||||||||
investments reflected in Tredegars consolidated | |||||||||
statements of income (net of tax) | $(12.7 | ) | $(3.6 | ) | $(32.1 | ) | $(8.8 | ) | |
Change in unrealized appreciation of venture | |||||||||
capital investments (net of tax) | (2.7 | ) | (28.6 | ) | (12.6 | ) | (58.1 | ) | |
After-tax depreciation of NAV related to | |||||||||
investment performance | $(15.4 | ) | $(32.2 | ) | $(44.7 | ) | $(66.9 | ) | |
The following companies held directly in the portfolio, or indirectly through our interests in other venture capital funds, accounted for most of the change in NAV during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002: |
(In Millions) Appreciation (Depreciation) in Estimated NAV |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investment | Reason for Change | 3rd Quarter Ended 9/30/02 |
Nine Months Ended 9/30/02 | ||||
Public companies: | |||||||
Illumina, Inc. | Change in stock price | (2.0 | ) | (5.3 | ) | ||
Universal Access, Inc. | Change in stock price | | (1.4 | ) | |||
Vascular Solutions | Change in stock price | (0.5 | ) | (1.1 | ) | ||
SignalSoft Corporation | Change in stock price (position liquidated) | |
(0.6 |
) | |||
Private companies: | |||||||
Venture capital funds | Various | (2.7 | ) | (9.9 | ) | ||
NovaLux, Inc. | Lower valuation of the company | | (4.8 | ) | |||
Appliant, Inc. | Lower valuation of the company | (0.6 | ) | (4.1 | ) | ||
eTunnels | Lower valuation of the company | (3.0 | ) | (3.0 | ) | ||
MedManage Systems Inc. | Lower valuation of the company | | (1.9 | ) | |||
Cbyon, Inc. | Lower valuation of the company | | (1.8 | ) | |||
Advanced Diagnostic, Inc. | Lower valuation of the company | (1.7 | ) | (1.7 | ) | ||
Kodiak Technologies, Inc. | Lower valuation of the company | (1.3 | ) | (1.6 | ) | ||
Songbird Medical, Inc. | Lower valuation of the company | (0.8 | ) | (1.4 | ) | ||
Artemis Medical, Inc. | Lower valuation of the company | (0.9 | ) | (0.9 | ) | ||
CEPTYR, Inc. | Lower valuation of the company | (0.7 | ) | (0.7 | ) | ||
Other public and private companies | Various | (0.4 | ) | (1.9 | ) | ||
Depreciation in NAV before operating expenses | (14.6 | ) | (42.1 | ) | |||
After-tax operating expenses | (0.8 | ) | (2.6 | ) | |||
Depreciation in NAV related to investment performance | $(15.4 | ) | $(44.7 | ) | |||
The cost basis, carrying value and NAV of the venture capital portfolio is reconciled below: 22 |
(In Millions) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sept. 30, 2002 |
Dec. 31, 2001 |
||||
Cost basis of investments | $ 194.3 | $ 190.0 | |||
Write-downs taken on securities held (charged to earnings) | (90.3 | ) | (47.9 | ) | |
Unrealized appreciation on public securities held by Tredegar | |||||
(reflected directly in equity net of deferred income taxes) | .9 | 13.0 | |||
Carrying value of investments reflected in the balance sheet | 104.9 | 155.1 | |||
Unrealized appreciation of private securities held by Tredegar and of | |||||
its indirect interest in all securities held by venture capital funds | 9.0 | 16.6 | |||
Estimated fair value of venture capital investments | 113.9 | 171.7 | |||
Estimated income tax benefit on assumed disposal at fair value | 28.9 | 6.6 | |||
NAV of venture capital investments | $ 142.8 | $ 178.3 | |||
Changes in NAV for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 are summarized below: |
(In Millions)
Nine Months Ended September 30 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
2001 | ||||
NAV at beginning of period | $ 178.3 | $ 335.0 | |||
After-tax depreciation in NAV related to investment performance | |||||
(net of operating expenses) | (44.7 | ) | (66.9 | ) | |
After-tax operating expenses funded by Tredegar | 2.6 | 2.9 | |||
New investments | 14.6 | 16.6 | |||
Reduction in NAV due to the sale of investments and
current taxes | (8.0 | ) | (30.7 | ) | |
Decrease in NAV | (35.5 | ) | (78.0 | ) | |
NAV at end of the period | $ 142.8 | $ 257.0 | |||
Liquidity and Capital Resources Tredegars total assets decreased to $836.2 million at September 30, 2002, from $865 million at December 31, 2001. The decrease is primarily due to the net of the following: |
| a decline in the carrying value of venture capital investments (decrease of $50.2 million) primarily due to valuation declines; |
| a decrease in inventory (down $5.8 million); |
| an increase in accounts receivable (up $16 million) primarily due to higher receivables in Aluminum Extrusions which were at seasonal and cyclical lows at the end of 2001; and |
| an increase in the prepaid pension asset (up $8.2 million) due to pension income recognized during the period. |
Cash and cash equivalents increased to $103.6 million at September 30, 2002, from $96.8 million at December 31, 2001. The reasons for changes in cash and cash equivalents for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 are summarized below: 23 |
(In Thousands) Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
2001 |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | $ 96,810 | $ 44,530 | |||
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities | |||||
net of capital expenditures and dividends | 19,630 | 11,026 | |||
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options | 1,951 | 177 | |||
Net (decrease) increase in borrowings | (5,333 | ) | (3,335 | ) | |
New venture capital investments, net of proceeds | |||||
from disposals | (7,890 | ) | 21,234 | ||
Proceeds from divestitures and property disposals | 143 | 2,224 | |||
Other, net | (1,696 | ) | (1,775 | ) | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 6,805 | 29,551 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ 103,615 | $ 74,081 | |||
In 2002, cash provided by continuing operating activities, net of capital expenditures and dividends was $19.6 million compared with $11 million in 2001. The change is primarily due to changes in the level of working capital offset in part by higher cash generated by manufacturing operations and lower capital expenditures. Capital expenditures decreased from $30 million in 2001 to $21.6 million in 2002. Capital expenditures in 2002 reflect the normal replacement of machinery and equipment and the following key capital projects: |
| machinery and equipment to upgrade lines at the films manufacturing facility in Kerkrade, The Netherlands; |
| machinery and equipment for a new production line at the films plant in Terre Haute, Indiana; |
| expansion of capacity at the films plant in Shanghai, China; and |
| machinery and equipment purchased for the aluminum plant in Kentland, Indiana. |
Debt outstanding of $259.2 million at September 30, 2002, consisted of a $250 million term loan, a note payable with a remaining balance of $5 million and other debt of $4.2 million. On April 30, 2002, we completed a $100 million 364-day revolving credit facility and terminated our $275 million revolver that would have matured in July 2002. The new facility has covenants and restrictions consistent with our existing debt; the most restrictive of which is a debt-to-capitalization limitation of 50%. At September 30, 2002, this ratio was 36%. The new facility provides for interest to be charged at a base rate (generally the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR)) plus a spread that is dependent upon our quarterly debt-to-capitalization ratio (see Note 10 on pages 11 to 12). This short-term facility is an interim step to longer-term financing that we plan to initiate once the divestitures of Molecumetics and Therics have been completed. 24 |
Our future contractual payments related to debt and operating lease obligations are summarized below: |
Payments Due by Period Ending September 30, (In Thousands) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
Remainder |
Total | ||||||||
Debt | $45,639 | $69,196 | $112,709 | $31,332 | $ 289 | $259,165 | |||||||
Operating leases* | 3,204 | 2,833 | 2,467 | 2,021 | 7,518 | 18,043 | |||||||
Total | $48,843 | 72,029 | $115,176 | $33,353 | $7,807 | $277,208 | |||||||
* Future payments for operating leases are estimated on a straight-line basis using annual calendar year obligations. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk Tredegar has exposure to the volatility of interest rates, polyethylene and polypropylene resin prices, aluminum ingot and scrap prices, foreign currencies, emerging markets and technology stocks. Changes in resin prices, and the timing of those changes, could have a significant impact on profit margins in Film Products; however, those changes are generally followed by a corresponding change in selling prices. Profit margins in Aluminum Extrusions are sensitive to fluctuations in aluminum ingot and scrap prices, but are also generally followed by a corresponding change in selling prices; however, there is no assurance that higher ingot costs can be passed along to customers. In the normal course of business, we enter into fixed-price forward sales contracts with certain customers for the sale of fixed quantities of aluminum extrusions at scheduled intervals. To hedge our exposure to aluminum price volatility under these fixed-price arrangements, which generally have a duration of not more than 12 months, we enter into a combination of forward purchase commitments and futures contracts to acquire aluminum, based on scheduled deliveries. We sell to customers in foreign markets through our foreign operations and through exports from U.S. plants. The percentage of consolidated net sales from manufacturing operations related to foreign markets for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 is presented below: |
Percentage of Net Sales from Manufacturing Operations Related to Foreign Markets* | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nine Months Ended September 30 | |||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||
Exports From U.S. |
Foreign Operations |
Exports From U.S. |
Foreign Operations |
||||||
Canada | 3 | % | 18 | % | 3 | % | 15 | % | |
Europe | 3 | 9 | 1 | 7 | |||||
Latin America | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | |||||
Asia | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |||||
Total | 13 | % | 31 | % | 10 | % | 26 | % | |
* | Based on consolidated net sales from manufacturing operations (excluding Therics, Tredegar Investments and Molecumetics). |
25 |
We attempt to match the pricing and cost of our products in the same currency and generally view the volatility of foreign currencies and emerging markets, and the corresponding impact on earnings and cash flow, as part of the overall risk of operating in a global environment. Exports from the U.S. are generally denominated in U.S. Dollars. Our foreign currency exposure on income from foreign operations in Europe primarily relates to the Euro. We believe our exposure to the Canadian Dollar has been substantially neutralized by the U.S. Dollar-based spread (the difference between selling prices and aluminum costs) generated from Canadian casting operations and exports from Canada to the U.S. We have investments in private venture capital fund limited partnerships and early-stage technology companies, including the stock of privately-held companies and the restricted and unrestricted stock of companies that have recently registered shares in initial public offerings. The portfolio is subject to risks typically associated with investments in technology start-up companies, which include business failure, illiquidity and stock market volatility. Furthermore, publicly traded stocks of emerging, technology-based companies have higher volatility and risk than the U.S. stock market as a whole. See pages 21 to 23 and Note 5 on pages 7 to 9 for more information. Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statements From time to time, we may make statements that may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe-harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based on our then current expectations and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those addressed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause such a difference include, but are not limited to the following: Film Products |
| Film Products is highly dependent on sales associated with one customer, The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G). P&G comprised 31% of our net sales in 2001, 28% in 2000 and 30% in 1999. The loss or significant reduction of sales associated with P&G would have a material adverse effect on our business, as would delays in P&G rolling out products utilizing new technologies developed by Tredegar. While we have undertaken efforts to expand our customer base, there can be no assurance that such efforts will be successful, or that they will offset any delay or loss of sales and profits associated with P&G. |
| Growth of Film Products depends on our ability to develop and deliver new products, especially in the hygiene market, which comprised over 75% of Film Products net sales in each of the last three years. Hygiene products are now being made with a variety of new materials, replacing traditional backsheet and other components. While we have substantial technical resources, there can be no assurance that our new products can be brought to market successfully, or if brought to market successfully, at the same level of profitability and market share of replaced films. A shift in customer preferences away from our technologies, our inability to develop and deliver new profitable products, or delayed acceptance of our new products in domestic or foreign markets, could have a material adverse effect on our business. |
| Film Products operates in a field where our significant customers and competitors have substantial intellectual property portfolios. The continued success of this business depends on our ability not only to protect our own technologies and trade secrets, but also to develop and sell new products that do not infringe upon existing patents. Although we are not currently involved in any patent litigation, the outcome of any such action could have a significant adverse impact on Film Products. |
26 |
| As Film Products expands its hygiene business, we have greater credit risk that is inherent in broadening our customer base. |
Aluminum Extrusions |
| Sales volume and profitability of Aluminum Extrusions is cyclical and highly dependent on economic conditions of end-use markets in the United States and Canada, particularly in the construction, distribution and transportation industries. Our market segments are also subject to seasonal slowdowns during the winter months. From 1992 to the second quarter of 2000, profits in Aluminum Extrusions grew as a result of positive economic conditions in the markets we serve and manufacturing efficiencies. However, a slowdown in these markets in the second half of 2000 resulted in a 13% decline in sales volume and 28% decline in ongoing operating profit compared with the second half of 1999. The aluminum extrusions industry continued to be affected by poor economic conditions in 2001 and the first nine months of 2002. Our sales volume declined 20% and operating profit declined 52% in 2001 compared with 2000. The decline in ongoing operating profit at approximately two to three times the rate of the decline in sales volume illustrates the operating leverage inherent in our operations (fixed operating costs). Any benefits associated with cost reductions and productivity improvements may not be sufficient to offset the adverse effects on profitability from pricing and margin pressure and higher bad debts that usually accompany a downturn. |
| The markets for our products are highly competitive with product quality, service and price being the principal competitive factors. As competitors increase capacity or reduce prices to increase business, there could be pressure to reduce prices to our customers. Aluminum Extrusions is under increasing domestic and foreign competitive pressures, including a growing presence of Chinese imports in a number of markets. This competition could result in loss of market share due to an ability to produce at lower costs and sell at lower prices. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain current margins and profitability. Our continued success and prospects depend on our ability to retain existing customers and participate in overall industry cross-cycle growth. |
Therics |
| We are attempting to sell Therics, but given the current market conditions in the biotechnology sector, there is no assurance that we will be successful in those efforts. We will continue to incur losses as we support Therics operations during the sale process. There is no assurance we will realize any return on our continuing investment in Therics. |
| Therics has incurred losses since inception, and we are unsure when, or if, it will become profitable. We have not brought any drug delivery systems or bone replacement products to commercialization. There can be no assurance that any new drug delivery systems or bone replacement products can be brought to market successfully. In addition, there can be no assurance that the FDA and other regulatory authorities will clear our products in a timely manner. |
27 |
| Our ability to develop and commercialize products will depend on our ability to internally develop preclinical, clinical, regulatory and sales and marketing capabilities, or enter into arrangements with third parties to provide those functions. We may not be successful in developing these capabilities or entering into agreements with third parties on favorable terms. Further, our reliance upon third parties for these capabilities could reduce our control over such activities and could make us dependent upon these parties. Our inability to develop or contract for these capabilities would significantly impair our ability to develop and commercialize products. |
| We are highly dependent on several principal members of our management and scientific staff. The loss of key personnel would have a material adverse effect on Therics business and results of operations, and could inhibit product development and commercialization efforts. In addition, recruiting and retaining qualified scientific personnel to perform future R&D work is critical to our success. Competition for experienced scientists is intense. Failure to recruit and retain executive management and scientific personnel on acceptable terms could prevent us from achieving our business objectives. |
| The patent positions of biotechnology firms generally are highly uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions that can determine who has the right to develop a particular product. No clear policy has emerged regarding the breadth of claims covered by biotechnology patents in the United States. The biotechnology patent situation outside the United States is even more uncertain and is currently undergoing review and revision in many countries. Changes in, or different interpretations of, patent laws in the United States and other countries might allow others to use our discoveries or to develop and commercialize our products without any compensation to us. |
Tredegar Investments
| Tredegars efforts to maximize the after-tax value of its venture capital investments could result in the sale of substantially all of the portfolio in the secondary market. Recent transactions in the secondary market have been completed with significant discounts to reported fair value. |
| If Tredegar does not dispose of a substantial portion of its venture capital portfolio by the end of 2003, it will forego significant tax benefits that would be available on the carry-back of possible capital losses. |
| The success, continued existence and value of the early-stage technology companies in which we invest depends on their ability to create or develop commercially viable products or businesses, and raise additional capital when needed. The possibility that companies in which we invest will not be able to meet their milestones or commercialize their technology, product or business concept presents significant risk. Additionally, companies in which we make seed or expansion round investments will often require substantial additional equity financing to satisfy continuing working capital requirements. Each round of venture financing is typically intended to provide a company with only enough capital to reach the next stage of development. We cannot predict the circumstances or market conditions under which the companies in which we invest will seek additional capital; however, current market conditions are not favorable. Companies that are unsuccessful in raising the needed additional capital are likely to fail, leaving little or no liquidation value for investors. |
28 |
| The success of our venture capital investments will be significantly affected by the state of the securities markets in general and, more specifically, the market for initial public offerings, the market for communications, life science and information technology companies, and the market for mergers and acquisitions. If we do not sell substantially all of the portfolio in the secondary market, we anticipate that a significant portion of our returns will be realized through initial public offerings of companies in which we have invested or through merger and acquisition activity. The market for initial public offerings and merger and acquisition activity is cyclical in nature. Thus, we cannot be certain that the securities markets will be receptive to initial public offerings or merger and acquisition activity, particularly those of early-stage companies. As seen during 2001, any adverse change in the market for initial public offerings could significantly impact our ability to realize our investment objective. Additionally, once a company becomes publicly traded, there is generally a period of time in which we are not permitted to trade the securities (the lock-up period, which is generally six months). |
| Valuing our venture capital investments is difficult and inexact. Our venture capital portfolio is comprised primarily of investments in private securities. The valuation of these securities is inherently subjective, and the estimated fair values reported by management might not reflect the price at which the securities could be sold in the open market. Recent transactions on the sale of venture capital portfolios in the secondary market have been completed at significant discounts to reported fair value. |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk See discussion under Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk beginning on page 25. Item 4. Controls and Procedures. Within the 90 days prior to the filing date of this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys chief executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon that evaluation, the chief executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company required to be included in the Companys periodic SEC filings. Subsequent to the date the Company carried out its evaluation, there have been no significant changes in the Companys internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these internal controls 29 |
PART II OTHER INFORMATION |
Item 6. | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K. |
(a) | Exhibit Nos. |
3 | Amended By-laws |
(b) | Reports on Form 8-K. |
The registrant filed a Form 8-K dated August 9, 2002, with respect to the certifications of Norman A. Scher, the registrants chief executive officer, and D. Andrew Edwards, the registrants principal financial officer, required pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
30 |
SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. |
Date: November 7, 2002 Date: November 7, 2002 |
Tredegar Corporation (Registrant) /s/ D. Andrew Edwards D. Andrew Edwards Vice President, Finance and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) /s/ Michelle O. Mosier Michelle O. Mosier Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |
31 |
CEO CERTIFICATIONI, Norman A. Scher, certify that: |
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tredegar Corporation (the Company); |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
4. | The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and we have: |
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and |
c) | presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. | The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
a) | all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Companys auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls; and |
32 |
6. | The Companys other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
Date: November 7, 2002 |
/s/ Norman A. Scher Norman A. Scher President and Chief Executive Officer |
33 |
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATIONI, D. Andrew Edwards, certify that: |
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tredegar Corporation (the Company); |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
4. | The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and we have: |
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and |
c) | presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation date; |
5. | The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
a) | all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Companys auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls; and |
34 |
6. | The Companys other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
Date: November 7, 2002 |
/s/ D. Andrew Edwards D. Andrew Edwards Vice President, Finance and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) |
35 |