Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
-------------------
FORM 10-K
/ X / ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996
/ / TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the transition period from to
---------- ----------
Commission File Number 0-17739
RAMTRON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 84-0962308
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
1850 Ramtron Drive, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80921
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (719) 481-7000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock ($.01 par value)
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes / X / No / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to
this Form 10-K. / /
As of March 21, 1997, 36,996,742 shares of the Registrant's Common
Stock were outstanding. The aggregate market value of Registrant's Common
Stock held by non-affiliates (based upon the average bid and ask prices of the
Common Stock, as reported on the Nasdaq National Market system on March 21,
1997) was approximately $103,300,000.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The registrant's definitive proxy statement (the "Proxy Statement") to be
prepared pursuant to Schedule 14A and filed in connection with solicitation of
proxies for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be held on May 29, 1997, is
incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
PART I
Item 1. BUSINESS
THE COMPANY
Ramtron International Corporation and its subsidiaries ("Ramtron" or the
"Company") are engaged primarily in the design, development, manufacture and
sale of specialty high performance semiconductor memory devices. Ramtron has
two product lines, ferroelectric nonvolatile random access memory (FRAM
(registered trademark)) products and high-speed DRAM (dynamic random access
memory) products, called Enhanced-DRAM (EDRAM) products. A glossary of
certain technical terms can be found on page 17.
The Company was incorporated in Delaware under the name of Amtec Securities
Corporation in January 1984. Its name was changed to Ramtron International
Corporation in January 1988. The Company's principal executive offices are
located at 1850 Ramtron Drive, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80921, and its
telephone number is (719) 481-7000.
The Company has two wholly owned subsidiaries, Enhanced Memory Systems, Inc.
("EMS"), which was established in May 1995, and Ramtron Kabushiki Kaisha
("Ramtron K.K."), which was established in July 1996. The Company formed EMS
to operate its EDRAM business. The Company formed Ramtron K.K. to perform
sales and marketing functions within Japan for the Company's products and to
act as a liaison between the Company and its Japan alliance partners. To
date, Ramtron K.K. has had limited operations.
Discussion of certain matters contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may
constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Reform Act"), and as such, may
involve risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements relate to,
among other things, expectations of the business environment in which Ramtron
operates, projections of future performance, perceived opportunities in the
market and statements regarding the Company's mission and vision. The
Company's actual results, performance and achievements may differ materially
from the results, performance and achievements expressed or implied in such
forward-looking statements. For a discussion of some of the factors that
might cause such a difference, see "Item 7. Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Expected Future
Results of Operations." From time to time, the Company details other risks
with respect to its business and financial results and conditions in its
filings with the Commission.
FRAM PRODUCTS
BACKGROUND
Ramtron's FRAM technology integrates ferroelectric materials with standard
semiconductor chip design and manufacturing technology to provide read/write
and nonvolatile memory products with unique performance characteristics and
properties. Ramtron's FRAM devices combine data nonvolatility with the
benefits of random access memory (RAM) devices including a high number of read
and write cycles, high speed for both read and write functions and low power
requirements.
The Company believes that its FRAM technology is a departure from standard
chip technology. In the late 1960's and 1970's, the U.S. integrated circuit
industry revolutionized electronics with a series of radically new chip
products including DRAMs, SRAMs, ROMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, MCUs
(microcontrollers), MPUs (microprocessors), bubble memories, and bipolar, MOS
and CMOS process technologies. In the 1980's and 1990's, the chip industry
has been principally characterized by improvements in manufacturing
technologies, not technology pioneering. In this evolutionary environment,
the Company believes that the performance characteristics of its FRAM chips
could enable it to address substantial opportunities by replacing existing
chip products if the Company could produce sufficient quantities at
commercially competitive densities and cost. Ramtron first demonstrated a
256-bit working FRAM prototype in 1987 and, in 1992, began its first
commercial sales of 4-kilobit (4K) FRAM devices. Commercial 16K FRAM devices
were introduced by the Company in 1994, the same year the Company entered into
an agreement with Hitachi to jointly develop higher density FRAM products
initially with a density of 256K. In 1995, the Company introduced prototypes
of its first 64K FRAM product.
Semiconductor memories are divided into two classes, volatile and nonvolatile.
Volatile devices require continuous application of power to retain data while
nonvolatile memories do not. Volatile memories are typically random access
memory ("RAM") while most nonvolatile memories are a form of read only memory
("ROM"). Each category has different benefits and disadvantages and
consequently are not interchangeable. It is not uncommon to find both
categories used within the same system.
DRAMs are the most common memory device because of their flexibility, large
capacity and low manufacturing cost. DRAMs are primarily used as the main
memory in general purpose computers for temporary storage of programs and data
while the system is powered. Nonvolatile memories are used to store programs
and data for fixed purpose computers where the memory changes infrequently.
Manufacturers of electronic products, in particular, portable systems, desire
a semiconductor memory solution that can cost-effectively provide both the
read/write capabilities of RAM with the nonvolatility of ROM. Characteristics
of an ideal memory include: (i) fast read/write speed; (ii) ability to endure
a high number of read/writes; (iii) nonvolatility; (iv) cost effectiveness;
(v) minimal power consumption; (vi) high density and (vii) minimal form
factor. There currently are no memory products in the market that provide a
solution for customers that require all of these benefits. To address the
inherent limitations of RAMs and ROMs, various combinations of the two are
used in most electronic systems to accomplish an acceptable level of memory
storage, data access and cost. Such product combinations and design
strategies often result in increased manufacturing and assembly costs, reduced
performance and/or product limitations. Current alternative nonvolatile
products on the market include:
EEPROM, which can be erased and reprogrammed electrically within the
system, but has limited writes (in the thousands), needs substantial power to
perform a write function and is very slow to reprogram.
Integrated Battery Backed Static RAM ("BBSRAM"), which is a volatile SRAM
device coupled with a lithium battery which maintains power to the SRAM when
system power is absent. This device provides high-speed read/write rates and
nonvolatile memory storage, but the relatively large size of the SRAM memory
cell and the attached battery render the device expensive and bulky for
installation on a board, and the reliability of batteries cannot be adequately
tested prior to installation.
Nonvolatile RAM ("NVRAM"), which consists of an SRAM and an EEPROM
incorporated in a single semiconductor device. This enables the device to
provide both the high-speed read/write rates and read/write endurance typical
of SRAM and the nonvolatile memory retention of EEPROM. However, the
complexity of NVRAM devices and the relatively high power and slow write from
the SRAM to the EEPROM before power is lost make it too costly and unreliable
for most commercial applications.
Flash Memory is an alternative to future FRAM products with 256-kilobits
and greater density. Flash memory offers the reprogrammability of EEPROM and,
because it uses a smaller memory cell than EEPROM, may cost less to
manufacture. However, it requires high power to write, is slow to reprogram
and has limited writes similar to an EEPROM.
CHARACTERISTICS OF FRAM PRODUCTS
Ramtron's FRAM products provide in a single component the high-speed
read/write characteristics and efficiencies of RAM with the nonvolatile memory
storage capability of ROM. By integrating the nonvolatile properties of its
ferroelectric materials with an industry standard CMOS semiconductor memory
manufacturing process, Ramtron has produced component-level nonvolatile RAM
products. The nonvolatile storage element in FRAM memories is a capacitor
that is integrated between the transistor and metalization layers of a typical
CMOS manufacturing process and is constructed from a thin film ferroelectric
between two metal electrodes. Ferroelectric materials inherently function in
a nonvolatile manner within a semiconductor memory device because they become
polarized when an electric field is applied and remain polarized after the
electric field is removed. Reversing the field causes spontaneous
polarization in the opposite direction. The positive or negative state of the
material can be sensed by the interaction of an applied electric field with
the material's polarization, thereby allowing for the storage of binary
digital information. Notwithstanding the theoretical simplicity of
nonvolatile ferroelectric memories, it has taken Ramtron over eight years to
be the first company to produce such memories in commercial volumes. High-
density FRAM memories, if they can be developed and commercially produced in a
timely and cost-effective manner, have the potential to impact significantly
the semiconductor memory industry. The advantages of Ramtron's FRAM products
include:
Fast write time. Because a FRAM device works by polarization rather than
stored-charge, it has very fast write speeds measured in nanoseconds
(billionths of a second) rather than milliseconds for EEPROMs or Flash
memories.
High write endurance. FRAM products deliver more than 10 billion
read/write cycles.
Nonvolatile retention. FRAM products can retain data without a power
source for as much as ten years under normal operating conditions.
Small form factor. Batteries, extra transistors, sockets or add-on
devices are unnecessary since nonvolatility is inherent in the ferroelectric
material.
Minimal power. FRAM devices have extremely low power demands (2 to 20
times less active current than alternative nonvolatile solutions) and require
less standby current.
The manufacturing costs of FRAM products are presently higher than those of
competing products. The Company and its strategic alliance partners are
working to reduce such manufacturing costs and, because of FRAM compatibility
with CMOS semiconductor manufacturing and the mask design of FRAM chips, the
Company believes that FRAM products are capable of being mass produced on a
cost-effective basis.
STRATEGY FOR FRAM PRODUCTS
To date, Ramtron has focused on the development and commercialization of low-
density (up to 64 kilobits) FRAM products, although the Company is also
pursuing the development of high-density (256 kilobits and above) FRAM
products through strategic alliances. Key elements of the Company's strategy
are summarized below.
INCREASE INTERNAL PRODUCTION CAPACITY FOR DIFFERENTIATED PRODUCTS. Ramtron is
currently pursuing a number of design and process improvements that will
increase its manufacturing output and lower its cost structure. This capacity
will be used to develop high margin niche products that will complement the
higher volume commodity capacity from the Company's alliance partners. Based
on the acceptance of FRAM products in a variety of sectors including consumer
electronics, industrial, medical, and telecommunications, the Company
perceives a range of product opportunities that may be unattractive to its
alliance partners, because they require relatively small volumes.
DEVELOP A COMPLEMENTARY MARKET POSITION. In the past, the Company's marketing
efforts have included a focus on the replacement of EEPROMs in existing
applications. With the emergence of higher density products, the Company
feels it is prudent to shift the marketing strategy to one that supports both
new proprietary products as well as those products fabricated by its alliance
partners. This position focuses on the benefits of FRAM products in bridging
the functions of ROM and RAM type memories.
PURSUE STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT AND MANUFACTURING ALLIANCES. To gain access to
advanced CMOS manufacturing processes and facilities, Ramtron has entered into
manufacturing alliances and licensing agreements for FRAM products with
certain well capitalized companies having or constructing advanced memory
products manufacturing capability, including Rohm, Hitachi, Toshiba and
Fujitsu. Since the purchase or construction of an advanced manufacturing
facility capable of mass producing memory devices would require a capital
outlay well beyond the Company's current capital resources, the Company
believes that the most suitable alternative is this strategic-alliance
approach which the Company believes will enable it to develop, manufacture and
sell FRAM products more rapidly and cost-effectively than any other available
alternative. Ramtron's intention is to utilize current and future alliance
relationships as foundry sources for FRAM products in order to provide the
Company with low-cost, high-volume, high-quality FRAM products for resale to
customers.
HITACHI. In May 1992, the Company entered into an agreement with Hitachi Ltd.
("Hitachi") to determine the feasibility of developing and manufacturing high-
density FRAM products. After completion of the feasibility study, Ramtron and
Hitachi expanded their relationship in April 1994 by entering into a five-year
agreement to develop jointly standard high-density FRAM products, initially
with a density of 256 kilobits and later with densities of 1 megabit and
4 megabits. In September 1995, the agreement was amended to cover also the
development of FRAM embedded products other than standard memory devices. The
co-development programs for the 1-megabit and 4-megabit FRAM products are
subject to successful commercial development of 256-kilobit FRAM products.
The initial joint development of a 256-kilobit FRAM product involves
evaluation, testing and completion of design, pilot fabrication at Hitachi's
facilities and qualification for commercialization of the 256-kilobit FRAM
products. Each party has agreed to bear its own development costs. The
Company and Hitachi announced in September 1996, that Hitachi would begin
sample shipments of 256-kilobit FRAM memories during the fourth quarter of
1996 with volume production beginning during the first half of 1997. The
expected timing of commencement of volume production has been delayed from
those previously reported due to process modifications surrounding the
transfer of the FRAM processing technology from the Company's fabrication
facility in Colorado Springs to Hitachi's state-of-the-art manufacturing
facility in Japan. The Company and Hitachi are presently in the
characterization and design modification stage of a 256-kilobit FRAM product
and final characterization for commercialization is expected to occur in the
first half of 1997. After characterization is achieved, Hitachi is expected
to begin commercially manufacturing 256-kilobit FRAM products during the
second half of 1997, although the Company can give no assurances that Hitachi
will be able to achieve such manufacturing expectations in the time provided.
Under the joint development agreement, Ramtron granted Hitachi a nonexclusive,
worldwide, perpetual license to utilize Ramtron's FRAM technology to develop,
design, use and sell high-density FRAM products and Hitachi granted Ramtron a
similar license with respect to any high-density FRAM technology solely
developed and owned by Hitachi. Jointly developed technology, and any related
patent rights, will be jointly owned. Hitachi agreed to pay Ramtron fixed
license fees for its licensed rights. Hitachi is also required to pay a
royalty on net sales to third parties of high-density FRAM products
manufactured by Hitachi, which royalty rate is fixed for five years from the
date of first shipment of 256-kilobit FRAM products by Hitachi and thereafter
is subject to the agreement of the parties. Pursuant to the April 1994
agreement, the parties also agreed to discuss in the future a high-density
FRAM products foundry and underlayer CMOS wafer supply agreement pursuant to
which Hitachi would manufacture for and supply to Ramtron such products on
terms to be determined after Hitachi has established a fabrication facility
for high-density FRAM products. The parties entered into a memorandum of
understanding (subject to the execution of definitive agreements) providing
that if Hitachi decides in its sole discretion to establish FRAM production
capacity for standard and non-standard FRAM products, then Ramtron is to be
allocated 25% to 33% of Hitachi's ferroelectric process capacity for standard
and non-standard FRAM products (up to a specified number of wafers per month),
subject to reaching agreement on business terms including price, delivery
schedule and quantities.
ROHM. In April 1993, Ramtron and Rohm Company, Ltd. ("Rohm"), a Japanese
semiconductor company, agreed to cooperate in a multiphase alliance to expand
the market for low-density FRAM products. In August 1994, Ramtron and Rohm
expanded their relationship to include certain licensing and manufacturing
arrangements to establish Rohm as a second-source manufacturer for low-density
FRAM products. Under the current agreement, Rohm has agreed to manufacture
standard and custom low-density FRAM products and supply such FRAM products to
Ramtron. Rohm is evaluating the Company's low-density FRAM products for
certain application-specific markets. Ramtron has the right to purchase up to
30% of Rohm's capacity of production wafers for FRAM products, which Ramtron
may adjust upward or downward by 9% depending upon Ramtron's projected product
sales. Rohm has been granted a nonexclusive, worldwide, perpetual license to
Ramtron's FRAM technology and improvements thereto to design, develop,
manufacture and sell FRAM products pursuant to a royalty arrangement with
Ramtron based on net sales to third parties, subject to certain limitations on
the quantity of FRAM product wafers Rohm may manufacture. Rohm agreed to pay
license fees for the licensed rights, a portion of which have been paid and
the remainder of which are payable upon achievement of certain manufacturing
milestones. In September 1995, the Company and Rohm jointly announced that
they agreed to the introduction of Ramtron's 16-kilobit FRAM product as the
standard design for the first generation of products to be built under their
alliance. Under the arrangement as modified, in September 1995, Ramtron
agreed to provide Rohm with a design for the 16-kilobit FRAM product and to
grant Rohm nonexclusive, nontransferable, worldwide, perpetual, product
license and design rights for Ramtron's 16-kilobit FRAM products. Such
license (including the right to manufacture and sell 16-kilobit FRAM products)
is subject to the limitations on manufacturing quantities described above. In
addition, Ramtron agreed to grant to Rohm a similar unrestricted license to 4-
kilobit and 64-kilobit FRAM products upon completion of the design of such
products by Ramtron, in consideration for the payment of additional license
fees by Rohm. The 64-kilobit FRAM design was transferred to Rohm in November
1996. The Company has also expanded the definition of low-density FRAM
products pursuant to the original agreement with Rohm to include 256-kilobit
FRAM products. The 16-kilobit FRAM product is currently being used to debug
the Rohm production line. Rohm had announced in September 1996 that it would
begin sample shipments of FRAM memories in September 1996 with volume
production beginning during the fourth quarter of 1996. Delays in this
original schedule have occurred as a result of Rohm's desire to integrate with
the Company's ferroelectric processes certain of their own ferroelectric
processing methods which they believe may improve the performance
characteristic of FRAM memories. The Company expects that sample shipments of
FRAM product memories manufactured by Rohm will commence during the second
quarter of 1997 with volume production beginning in the second half of 1997,
although the Company can give no assurance that Rohm will be able to achieve
such manufacturing expectations in the time provided.
TOSHIBA. In July 1995, the Company entered into a FRAM Technology License
Agreement with Toshiba Corporation ("Toshiba") for the design, development,
manufacture, use and sale of high-density FRAM products. The agreement
provides for the transfer to Toshiba of certain FRAM technology developed and
owned by Ramtron. Under the agreement, Ramtron granted to Toshiba a
nonexclusive, worldwide, perpetual license to the FRAM technology,
improvements and related intellectual property rights to design, develop,
manufacture, use and sell FRAM products with 256 kilobits or greater
densities, and Toshiba granted to Ramtron a license to use Toshiba's
improvements in the FRAM technology. The agreement has a term of ten years
and continuation of the agreement by Toshiba was subject to completion of a
joint feasibility study of the FRAM technology for Toshiba to determine the
feasibility of the implementation of FRAM technology into FRAM products. The
feasibility study was completed in September 1996, and the parties are
currently conducting a compatibility study of the underlayers fabricated by
Toshiba and the capacitors fabricated by Ramtron. The next milestone to be
achieved pursuant to the agreement is the first sale of engineering products
by Toshiba. Toshiba also has the right to license the FRAM technology for use
in certain radio frequency identification ("RF/ID") devices after December 31,
1998. Under the agreement, Toshiba is required to pay license fees, a
portion of which were paid and the remainder of which are payable upon
achievement of certain development and manufacturing milestones. In addition,
Toshiba is required to pay additional lump-sum license fees upon achieving
certain product sales levels if it elects to exercise an option to receive
Ramtron's improvements on the FRAM technology developed after completion of
the feasibility study. Toshiba is required to pay royalties to Ramtron based
on its net sales of FRAM products and the royalty rates payable are graduated
downward over a ten-year period. The parties also agreed that, pursuant to a
separate agreement to be executed prior to Toshiba achieving commercial
manufacturing, Toshiba will manufacture and sell to Ramtron standard and other
FRAM products on terms to be agreed between the parties.
FUJITSU. In December 1995, the Company and Fujitsu Limited ("Fujitsu")
entered into a FRAM Technology License Agreement. The Company granted to
Fujitsu in that agreement a nonexclusive, worldwide, perpetual license to use
the FRAM technology to develop, manufacture, use and sell standard memory FRAM
products. Upon execution of the agreement, Fujitsu paid to the Company an up-
front license fee. The agreement provides for the Company to transfer to
Fujitsu FRAM technical information and data sufficient for Fujitsu to conduct
a feasibility study of the FRAM technology. The successful completion of the
feasibility study occurred in June 1996, and Fujitsu and the Company are
conducting jointly a technical evaluation of the FRAM technology. Upon the
successful completion of the evaluation, Fujitsu may elect to design and
develop with the Company 1-megabit or 16-megabit FRAM products or to proceed
with the design and development of FRAM products on its own. The agreement
provides for Fujitsu to make additional license payments concurrently with
Fujitsu's commencement of the development of FRAM products and for Fujitsu to
make royalty payments based on its sales of FRAM products for a specified
period from the date of Fujitsu's first sale of FRAM products. The agreement
also provides for the cross-license by Fujitsu and the Company of their
respective improvements in the FRAM technology and the joint ownership of
jointly developed technology. The agreement further provides for the Company
and Fujitsu to enter into a foundry agreement during the design and
development phase as described above. The Company will have the right under
the foundry agreement for a specified period of time to purchase an agreed
portion of Fujitsu's monthly FRAM production capacity, subject to certain
limits. In August 1996, the Company and Fujitsu entered into an amendment to
the FRAM Technology License Agreement to include the use of such technology in
the development, manufacture and sale of embedded memory FRAM products (other
than in RF/ID applications). The amendment provides for Fujitsu to make an
upfront license payment (which was made in December 1995), a payment upon the
completion of an embedded FRAM product evaluation (which evaluation is
currently being conducted) and royalty payments based on its sales of such
products and for Ramtron to have the right (under the foundry agreement to be
entered into between the Company and Fujitsu under the FRAM Technology License
Agreement) for a specified period of time to purchase an agreed portion of
Fujitsu's monthly production capacity for such products, subject to certain
limits.
SAMSUNG. In December 1996, the Company and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
("Samsung") entered into a FRAM License Agreement for the manufacture and sale
of FRAM products. Under the agreement, Ramtron granted to Samsung a
worldwide, perpetual, nonexclusive, nontransferable, nonsublicensable, right
and license to use certain Ramtron intellectual property rights and
improvements in connection with the sale of FRAM Products, including RF/ID
devices, and Samsung granted to Ramtron a license to use Samsung's
improvements in the FRAM technology. Under the agreement, Samsung is required
to pay license fees, a portion of which were paid and the remainder are to be
paid upon the first sale of product by Samsung or in December 1997, whichever
occurs earlier. Samsung is required to pay royalties to Ramtron based on its
net sales of non-RF/ID FRAM products over a ten-year period commencing upon
the first commercial sale of FRAM products by Samsung. Royalties payable to
Ramtron for RF/ID FRAM products are payable over the life of the Ramtron
intellectual property rights granted under the agreement.
SGS-THOMSON. In February 1997, the Company and SGS-Thomson Microelectronics
SA ("SGS-Thomson") finalized a non-binding FRAM technology Memorandum of
Understanding (the "MOU"). Pursuant to the terms of the MOU, under Phase 1 of
the collaboration, Ramtron will process SGS-Thomson base silicon wafers using
proprietary ferroelectric technology to create CMOS 64-kilobit nonvolatile
FRAM memory devices. Upon successful completion of integrating Ramtron's
technology with SGS-Thomson's manufacturing capability, both parties intend to
proceed with the second phase of the program, which includes certain
manufacturing and licensing initiatives. Phase three of the agreement
anticipates an expansion of the license between Ramtron and SGS-Thomson.
PURSUE COMPLEMENTARY FERROELECTRIC APPLICATIONS. Ramtron's ferroelectric
technology has product applications other than for nonvolatile memory storage
in semiconductor memory devices. For example, Ramtron has identified
complementary applications in products that integrate its ferroelectric
technology into microcontrollers, programmable logic devices and radio wave
identification devices. To exploit such applications without diverting the
Company's focus of resources from the development of FRAM products, Ramtron
has pursued a strategy of licensing its ferroelectric technology to, and
entering into joint ventures with, companies interested in exploiting other
product applications. Ramtron also intends to develop internally and
manufacture certain of such products designed for specific applications.
RACOM/INTAG. Racom Systems, Inc. ("Racom") is primarily engaged in the
business of exploiting the benefits of FRAM technology in contactless smart
card financial transaction systems using ferroelectric RF/ID devices. The low
power requirement of ferroelectric technology makes it attractive for the
RF/ID market. In October 1991, Ramtron granted Racom a nonexclusive license
to use Ramtron's ferroelectric technology for identification devices powered
by sound waves or electromagnetic waves without physical contact between the
device and the power source (a "Ferroelectric RF/ID Device") and granted Racom
an exclusive supply contract for Ferroelectric RF/ID Devices until January 1,
1999. Racom paid Ramtron a license fee and issued to Ramtron one-third of
Racom's outstanding common stock for such rights. In April 1994, the Company
increased its ownership in Racom to 50% in consideration for providing to
Racom additional rights under the original license. In June 1994, the
Company's ownership percentage decreased to approximately 45% as a result of a
private stock offering by Racom. In November 1994, Ramtron decreased its
ownership interest in Racom to approximately 42% as a result of the sale to
Intag International Ltd. ("Intag") of shares of Racom common stock. In
February 1995, Ramtron and Racom amended their nonexclusive license agreement
and Ramtron, in exchange for receipt of license fees and shares representing
approximately 10% of the outstanding shares of Racom common stock, agreed to
extend the exclusive supply period to the end of the year 2005.
In May 1995, Ramtron, Racom and Intag entered into a Memorandum of
Understanding which supersedes the February 1995 Ramtron/Racom agreement
pursuant to which (i) Ramtron received the right to manufacture and sell
ferroelectric RF/ID Devices not incorporating a microprocessor in
consideration for the payment of royalties to Racom on such product sales,
(ii) Racom received the exclusive, worldwide rights (with the exception of the
rights granted to Toshiba after December 31, 1998) to use the ferroelectric
technology in all "contactless applications," (iii) Intag received the
exclusive, worldwide right to use the ferroelectric technology in combination
with contactless technology for certain conveyer-fed applications, except that
Racom has the right to sell microprocessor-based "financial transaction cards"
in certain markets, and (iv) Intag received the nonexclusive worldwide right
to develop and sell products incorporating ferroelectrics and contactless
technology not incorporating a microprocessor for all other RF/ID
applications. The parties are currently negotiating a definitive license
agreement intended to incorporate the terms of the May 1995 Memorandum of
Understanding. Although pursuant to the May 1995 Memorandum of Understanding,
Racom and Intag are each required to purchase at least 30% of their wafer
requirements from Ramtron, provided Ramtron's prices are competitive, the
parties have since agreed that the definitive license agreement between them
will not include such a requirement. Intag is required to pay a royalty to
Ramtron on all products it sells containing RF/ID FRAM chips not purchased
from Ramtron. In consideration for the grant of such rights, Intag paid
license fees to the Company and Racom in 1995. As of December 31, 1996,
Ramtron's ownership interest in Racom was 42%, all of which has been pledged
to secure a loan to Ramtron from the National Electrical Benefit Fund, and
Intag's ownership interest in Racom was 46%.
PURSUE LEADING EDGE TECHNOLOGY AND DEVELOP NEW PRODUCTS. Ramtron intends to
maintain its leadership in developing FRAM products. Ramtron is currently
developing a 256-kilobit FRAM product with Hitachi as well as a shrunk version
of its 64-kilobit FRAM product using a local interconnect process. The
Company is also developing a one transistor/one capacitor ("1T/1C") memory
cell to reduce the size and cost of future high-density and low-density FRAM
memory products. In addition, the Company is continuing to research and
develop alternative ferroelectric material compositions with the aim to
further increase the performance potential of its products.
SYMETRIX. In October 1992, the Company and Symetrix Corporation ("Symetrix")
entered into a Technology Agreement. Symetrix is a technology support company
that is engaged in the development of high-performance ferroelectric materials
using its process called Y-1 for use in memory products. In August 1995,
Ramtron and Symetrix entered into a Ferroelectric Cross License Agreement (the
"Cross License Agreement") which superseded the 1992 Technology Agreement.
The Cross License Agreement provides Ramtron with the right to use Symetrix's
ferroelectric technology and certain rights to sublicense that technology, and
Symetrix with the right to use Ramtron's ferroelectric technology and certain
rights to sublicense that technology, with certain limited exceptions and on a
non-exclusive, worldwide basis to make, use and sell Y-1 based ferroelectric
integrated circuit memories. Each party must pay the other royalties on sales
of ferroelectric integrated circuit memories incorporating the other party's
technology, and on sales by sublicensees, and Ramtron is required to pay a
technology transfer fee to Symetrix in four equal annual installments
commencing 60 days after the effective date of the 1995 agreement.
FRAM PRODUCTS AND MARKETS
Ramtron classifies all of its current products as "low-density" FRAM products
due to the fact that they all have memory capacity of 64 kilobits or lower.
To date, Ramtron has introduced fourteen versions of its ferroelectric
products in the 4-kilobit and 16-kilobit density range in both parallel and
serial data bus configurations. Many of Ramtron's existing products are pin
compatible with EEPROM products that bear similar product number names. The
Company is currently qualifying a new design of its 64-kilobit parallel FRAM
memory product which is expected to be in commercial production in 1997. The
Company is developing high-density FRAM products with certain of its strategic
alliance partners, and Hitachi has announced that it expects to commence
commercial production of a 256-kilobit FRAM device in 1997. (See "Business -
FRAM Products - Strategy for FRAM Products - Pursue Strategic Development and
Manufacturing Alliances - Hitachi" above.) The Company sold $1.9 million of
FRAM products in 1996. Ramtron has been developing technology such as the
1T/1C cell and the local interconnect process needed to achieve high-density
FRAM products and to reduce the cost of low-density FRAM products and will
continue to pursue such development.
The applications of low-density FRAM devices include consumer electronics,
business machines, communications equipment, test instruments, industrial
controls and medical equipment. As of December 31, 1996, the Company had sold
FRAM products, either directly or through Ramtron's distributors, to over 700
customers with applications predominantly in the industrial marketplace,
including industrial control, medical, instrumentation, metering and
communications systems. Although Ramtron has been informed by more than 700
customers that they have "designed-in" FRAM products into their products, it
is difficult for Ramtron to estimate the number of customers with continuing
supply needs for FRAM devices. The cost of the Company's products continues
to be high compared to competing products. Since Ramtron is selling
principally to smaller customers for specialized uses of FRAM products, such
customers are generally not as price conscious because they often require most
or all of the characteristics of FRAM products. Ramtron has been limited in
its ability to market to high volume users of nonvolatile memory storage
devices in the absence of a second-source manufacturer and as a result of the
cost of currently available FRAM products. The Company expects that as it
lowers its costs through its foundry arrangements with outside manufacturers,
the applications for FRAM products will continue to grow beyond the market
segments described above. Although Ramtron anticipates that utilization of
the advanced semiconductor manufacturing processes and facilities of its
strategic alliance partners will enable the Company to mass produce FRAM
products at lower prices, the Company cannot estimate when such products will
be available for mass marketing at competitive prices.
FRAM PRODUCT MANUFACTURING
Ramtron believes that reductions in the cost of manufacturing FRAM products
are important to its long-term success and Ramtron is continually working to
reduce its manufacturing costs. As discussed above, the Company has entered
into strategic alliances, some of which impose an obligation on the parties to
negotiate supply/foundry arrangements for FRAM products. Such arrangements
are important for the Company if it is to gain access to advanced
semiconductor manufacturing facilities to potentially enable Ramtron to
manufacture products at substantially lower costs and in greater volumes than
can currently be achieved. To do so, the Company is attempting to (i)
increase yields by systematically identifying and reducing variability in
manufacturing processes that result in the production of defective products,
(ii) redesign the products both to reduce size and to utilize new or improved
manufacturing processes that can increase yields, and (iii) develop and refine
manufacturing processes that increase yields, reduce the product dimensions or
reduce the number of processing steps used to manufacture the product.
ENHANCED-DRAM PRODUCTS
Ramtron has developed a family of Enhanced-DRAM (EDRAM) products which
capitalize on unique architectural and design features to provide what the
Company believes are the highest performance DRAM products available. Ramtron
currently produces EDRAM products under foundry agreements with Nippon Steel
Semiconductor Co. Ltd. ("Nippon Steel") and IBM.
BACKGROUND
Because of their low cost and unlimited random access read/write capability,
DRAMs are the most widely used memory device in computing applications.
Significant improvements in microprocessor (MPU) speeds and increasing
architectural complexity in computing systems has created a performance
bottleneck at the memory system level due to slow memory access speed and
bandwidth. Because DRAMs operate at slow speeds relative to the MPU, high-
speed static random access memories (SRAMs) have been used to improve memory
access and retrieval speed. However, the large memory cell size of the SRAM
makes it significantly more expensive than the DRAM. Alternate DRAM
architectures have been developed which use interleaving of several memory
banks such as synchronous DRAM (SDRAM) and Rambus DRAM (RDRAM). Other DRAMs
such as extended data output (EDO) and burst EDO use pipelining of data.
These alternate DRAMs do not improve the basic access or retrieval speed of
the DRAM but instead only improve peak bandwidth. Most high performance
systems require combinations of small amounts of SRAM to "cache" data
transfers and high bandwidth DRAM architectures to fill the cache quickly.
Even with these techniques, the larger size of today's software operating
systems and applications and the frequent context changes required by
multitasking create a bottleneck limited by the DRAM access and retrieval
speed.
CHARACTERISTICS OF EDRAM PRODUCTS
To address the access and retrieval speed limitations of DRAMs and the high
costs associated with high speed SRAMs, Ramtron developed a group of 4-megabit
EDRAM products. Ramtron's EDRAM products combine what it believes is the
fastest 4-megabit DRAM (25-35 nanoseconds) together with a 10-15 nanosecond
SRAM and a 2,048 bit-wide integrated DRAM to SRAM interconnecting bus, all on
the same chip. The Company's EDRAMs can operate at the high speeds of today's
MPUs enabling systems to operate faster and at a reduced overall system cost
than systems using SRAM cache plus standard DRAM or the alternate DRAM
architectures. Testing of EDRAM-based systems by Ramtron's customers has
shown system performance improvements from 30-100% over similar systems with
DRAM or DRAM plus SRAM cache. The system performance of EDRAM approaches the
speed of a complete SRAM memory system but with significant improvements in
cost and density.
The Company developed a family of 4-megabit EDRAM components that use the same
packaging as the standard DRAM and a family of EDRAM single in-line memory
modules (SIMM) and dual in-line memory modules (DIMM) that use the same form
factor and connectors as a standard DRAM SIMM module. This allows system
developers to design higher performance systems using the same packaging and
control logic technique as slower DRAMS and to design systems which can use
either memory type to provide two performance options. The Company began
selling EDRAMs in commercial volumes in the first quarter of 1993. The EDRAM
product has been demonstrated to provide a performance advantage and cost
effective memory solution for a variety of the highest performance system
applications including personal computer motherboards, accelerator boards,
multiprocessor systems, disk controllers, embedded computer modules,
communication bridge/routers, digital signal processing systems and video
graphic systems.
NEW EDRAM PRODUCTS. During 1996, the Company began development of a
16-megabit version of its EDRAM product. The new product will be fully
compatible with the industry standard Synchronous DRAM (SDRAM) products that
are expected to become the standard main memory for PC systems during 1997.
The new products use the EDRAM architecture internally to provide
significantly faster access and retrieval speeds than SDRAM. The product has
been named the Enhanced Synchronous DRAM (ESDRAM). The ESDRAM can replace
SDRAM directly on printed circuit boards and on current dual inline memory
modules (DIMMs) and small outline dual inline memory modules (SO DIMMs)
currently being used in PC desktop and notebook computer systems. The new
ESDRAM has the same speed as burst SRAM but with 8-16 times higher density and
much lower cost. This will allow the Company to continue to provide a higher
density and lower cost solution to static RAM (SRAM) products while
maintaining a premium over slower DRAMs.
STRATEGY FOR EDRAM PRODUCTS
The Company's strategy is to provide SRAM performance with DRAM density in a
product with significantly lower pricing than SRAMs. A significant portion of
the Company's EDRAM business is targeted at replacement of fast (10-15
nanosecond) SRAMs in high performance systems. In these applications, EDRAM
provides a 400% density improvement and a significantly lower cost/bit than
equivalent SRAM products. EDRAM provides the customer cost and density
advantages while allowing the Company to command a price premium over slower
DRAMs. The added performance features do not add significantly to production
costs when compared to standard DRAMs.
The Company's plan has been to produce EDRAMs through strategic alliances with
major semiconductor companies and to expand the market for EDRAMs by making
EDRAM products available from multiple sources. This approach avoids the high
capital costs associated with DRAM manufacturing that would have otherwise
been incurred by the Company if it had chosen to manufacture these products
with Company-provided resources.
NIPPON STEEL. In May 1995, the Company entered into a Transit Foundry
Agreement with Nippon Steel pursuant to which Nippon Steel agreed to
manufacture and sell 4-megabit EDRAM products to the Company at specified
prices for the Company's resale to its customers. The Transit Foundry
Agreement was scheduled to terminate March 31, 1996, but was extended to
December 31, 1996. The Company and Nippon Steel are currently engaged in
discussions to extend the Transit Foundry Agreement to the end of 1997 and at
this time Nippon Steel continues to manufacture EDRAM products for the
Company.
IBM. In April 1995, Ramtron entered into a five-year agreement with IBM under
which Ramtron is required to design and qualify, and IBM will manufacture,
completed wafers for the Company's EDRAM products. Before such products are
manufactured by IBM, they are put through a design review. Final design
review on the 4-megabit EDRAM product was completed in March 1996, and IBM
began shipping qualified product to the Company during the fourth quarter of
1996. During the five-year agreement, IBM is permitted to terminate
production for various reasons, including Ramtron's failure to qualify product
or agree to certain yield targets, and IBM may terminate production for any
reason upon 30-days notice to Ramtron. In addition, IBM has the right to
reject Ramtron's purchase orders for completed wafers for EDRAM products for
various reasons, including Ramtron's request for quantities of units that
exceed the quantities IBM wishes to supply or request for performance of
services or shipment dates that IBM deems unacceptable.
Ramtron granted to IBM an irrevocable, worldwide, nonexclusive license to use
Ramtron's EDRAM technology and know-how for the development, fabrication,
lease, sale or transfer of EDRAM products by or for IBM. IBM also received
the unlimited right to manufacture EDRAMs for its internal consumption on a
royalty-free basis, and the right to manufacture an amount up to two times
Ramtron's total sales of EDRAMs for external sales on a royalty-free basis.
IBM may exceed such limit by paying Ramtron a royalty on such EDRAM sales.
IBM does not have an obligation to supply such products to Ramtron until IBM
begins external sales of EDRAM products to third parties, in which case
Ramtron will have the right to purchase from IBM completed wafers in an amount
up to 100% of IBM's previous quarterly sales of EDRAMs. Pursuant to the
current agreement between the Company and IBM, IBM has agreed to the
manufacture of DRAM products for the Company through the end of 1997. Ramtron
and IBM have the right to terminate the agreement upon the occurrence of
certain customary termination events, and either party may terminate for
convenience upon 90-days notice to the other party. If Ramtron terminates due
to IBM's default or IBM terminates for convenience, IBM has the right to
continue in perpetuity all licenses granted to the EDRAM technology and know
how on a royalty-bearing basis. Upon all other events of termination and upon
expiration of the term of the agreement, IBM's license rights continue in
perpetuity on a royalty-free basis.
EMS. In May 1995, Ramtron formed EMS as a wholly owned subsidiary through
which the Company operates its EDRAM business, including designing, marketing
and selling EDRAM products manufactured by third-party manufacturing partners.
The creation of a separate organization serves to focus all of Ramtron's non-
ferroelectric activities in a single organization. The Company currently
sells ten 4-megabit EDRAM product configurations with three speed grades, two
temperature ranges, two power supply voltages, and a low standby current
version. These products include components with 4-megabit by 1, l-megabit by
4 and 512-kilobit by 8 configurations and 7 SIMM modules with 2-megabyte,
4-megabyte, 8-megabyte and 16-megabyte capacities and 2 DIMM modules
with 4-megabyte and 8-megabyte capacities. Each product is available with 12,
15 or 20 nanosecond speed. The Company sold $16.0 million of EDRAM products
in 1996.
The Company expects the EDRAM products to remain competitive with fast SRAM
and the alternate DRAM architectures (EDO DRAM, burst EDO DRAM, SDRAM, RDRAM
and others) for the foreseeable future. Although many of the alternate DRAM
products are moving to 16-megabit densities and higher, many EDRAM market
segments do not require such large memory capacities. The departure of many
of the competing memory suppliers to serve the volume PC main memory market
with 16-megabit products could enhance EDRAM opportunities in embedded control
applications which do not require large memory capacities.
EDRAM PRODUCT MANUFACTURING
Because of the large capital costs associated with manufacturing DRAMs, the
Company's manufacturing strategy with respect to EDRAM products has been to
contract with conventional DRAM manufacturers to produce such products on
behalf of the Company. To date, Nippon Steel and IBM have been the Company's
manufacturers of these products.
The Company has recently redesigned the EDRAM to reduce its size by utilizing
process improvements at Nippon Steel and IBM so that more products can be
produced per wafer and yields can be improved. These product improvements
will reduce costs and improve EDRAM access and retrieval speeds. The Company
is currently working to develop EDRAM products with 16-megabit and higher
densities to serve the needs of the high performance PC market and to reduce
component counts in embedded control systems. The development of 16-megabit
and 64-megabit manufacturing capability with new and existing alliance
partners is a priority for the Company.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Development of additional FRAM and EDRAM products and the associated design
development and manufacturing processes will require the Company to make
significant additional investments in research and development. Continued
investment in both products and processes is critical to the Company's success
and, in the case of the Company's ferroelectric technology, to the ultimate
commercial realization of such ferroelectric technology. See "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -
Liquidity and Capital Resources." The Company's current research and
development activities are focused on expanding the Company's technology to
develop new low-density and high-density applications, materials and
processes, design concepts and architectures.
As of December 31, 1996, approximately 32 of the Company's employees were
engaged in research and development. In addition, manufacturing personnel
were involved in research and development through efforts to increase the
manufacturing yields of the Company's products. The Company's research and
development expenditures for 1996, 1995 and 1994 were approximately
$12.9 million, $11.5 million, and $16.5 million, respectively. Customer-
sponsored research and development expenditures during 1996, 1995 and 1994
were approximately $.2 million, $.2 million and $.5 million, respectively.
MANUFACTURING
The Company's manufacturing strategy is to develop products internally and
through codevelopment alliances for production by third-party manufacturers.
Consistent with this strategy, Ramtron has entered into arrangements with
Rohm, Hitachi, Toshiba and Fujitsu for the development and manufacture of FRAM
products and with Nippon Steel and IBM for the manufacture of EDRAM products.
The Company has also entered into a licensing arrangement with Samsung for the
Company's ferroelectric technology, but such license does not include
codevelopment or manufacturing arrangements between the Company and Samsung.
Rohm is currently initiating manufacture of the Company's low density FRAM
products for certain application specific markets with a view to manufacturing
such products for sale by Rohm to customers and to the Company for resale to
customers. The Company has not yet negotiated the definitive terms of the
foundry supply agreements with Hitachi, Toshiba or Fujitsu, but such companies
are contractually bound to enter into such agreements upon fulfillment of
certain conditions. Nippon Steel is currently producing EDRAM products for
the Company pursuant to a Transit Foundry Agreement which expired in March
1996, but was extended to December 31, 1996. The Company and Nippon Steel are
currently engaged in discussions to extend the Transit Foundry Agreement to
the end of 1997. IBM is also producing EDRAM products for the Company
pursuant to an agreement where IBM has agreed to manufacture EDRAM products
for the Company through the end of 1997. The Company intends to continue
limited production of its low-density FRAM products internally by purchasing
silicon wafer underlayers from outside suppliers and completing manufacture of
the products by applying its ferroelectric process to such underlayers at the
Company's facility in Colorado Springs. Ramtron currently purchases such
underlayers from two suppliers and will continue to pursue additional
underlayer suppliers.
Ramtron's agreements with its third-party manufacturers are intended to enable
the Company to avoid the large capital expenditures that otherwise would be
required to manufacture FRAM products and high-density DRAM products in
commercial volumes. As a result, however, the Company is currently dependent
on Nippon Steel and IBM for its supply of EDRAM products and will in the
future be dependent on other manufacturers for the manufacture of FRAM and
EDRAM products. The Company believes that it is most efficient for the
Company to focus its internal manufacturing efforts on production of limited
quantities of the Company's FRAM products to satisfy FRAM customer needs while
second-source suppliers are developing and qualifying such products.
As is customary in the semiconductor industry, the Company and its third-party
manufacturers subcontract with foreign companies to assemble and test its
finished products. Manufacturing services performed by such third parties are
conducted in accordance with processes designed by the Company or its third-
party manufacturers and implemented under supervision of process engineers of
the Company or such third-party manufacturers.
Federal, state and local regulations impose various environmental controls on
the discharge of chemicals and gases used in the Company's manufacturing
processes. The Company believes that it has taken all necessary steps to
ensure that its activities comply with all applicable environmental rules and
regulations. While the Company's operations have not been materially impacted
by the cost of environmental compliance, there can be no assurance that
changes in such environmental rules and regulations will not require
additional investments in capital equipment and compliance programs in the
future. Any failure by the Company to comply with such environmental rules
and regulations regarding the discharge of hazardous substances could subject
it to substantial liabilities or could adversely affect its manufacturing
operations.
In 1996, revenues from Rohm, Toshiba, Fujitsu and Samsung each accounted for
more than 10% of total license fee revenues. Rohm, Toshiba, Fujitsu and
Samsung are licensees of the Company's ferroelectric technology. If certain
development milestones are not met with certain of these companies during 1997
under the Company's license and development agreements with the companies, the
resulting loss of license revenues to the Company could have a material
adverse effect on the Company's results of operations or financial condition.
Export product sales as a percentage of total product sales were 21%, 49% and
57% for the years 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
MARKETING
As is typical of any other new products in the semiconductor industry,
Ramtron's products can require lengthy "design-in" cycles for customer
applications and extensive application engineering support. The Company
supports its customers' design-in activities and considers such support an
important element of its sales and marketing efforts.
The Company markets its products worldwide through distribution networks using
internal sales resources and independent sales representatives and
distributors. The Company maintains three full time sales personnel at its
headquarters in Colorado Springs and resident employees in San Jose,
California, Japan and Europe. The Company has distribution and/or
representation relationships with 3 companies in Japan, 18 in Europe, 3 in
Singapore, 2 in Israel, 2 in Thailand and 1 in each of Taiwan, Korea, South
Africa, China and Australia. In the United States, the Company has
distribution/representation relationships with 19 companies and two in Canada.
In December 1994, the Company formed a distribution partnership with Montreal-
based Future Electronics. Future Electronics serves as the Company's primary
distributor in North America. The Company's representatives and distributors
sell products which are competitive and complementary with the Company's
products, although none offers ferroelectric-type semiconductors.
BACKLOG
The rate of booking new orders varies from month to month and depends on
scheduling practices of individual customers. Cyclical industry conditions
make it difficult for many customers to enter into long-term, price-fixed
contracts. Orders are typically entered into under the condition that the
terms may be adjusted to reflect market conditions at the delivery date. For
the foregoing reasons, and because of the possibility of customer changes in
delivery schedules or cancellations of orders without significant penalty, the
Company does not believe that its backlog as of any particular date is firm or
that it is a reliable indicator of actual sales for any succeeding period.
COMPETITION
The semiconductor industry is intensely competitive and characterized by rapid
technological change and product obsolescence, price erosion, periodic
shortages of materials, variations in manufacturing yields and efficiencies
and significant foreign competition. The industry includes major domestic and
international companies with substantially greater financial, technical,
manufacturing and marketing resources than are available to the Company. The
Company expects to face intense competition from major manufacturers of the
types of semiconductor memory products it hopes its FRAM and EDRAM products
will displace. The Company expects manufacturers of such existing products to
attempt, among other strategies, to improve their products to counter the
advantages of FRAM and EDRAM products.
The Company considers its FRAM products to be competitive with existing
nonvolatile memory products such as EEPROM, BBSRAM and NVRAM products in low
density applications. Nonvolatile memory products are manufactured and
marketed both by major corporations possessing worldwide wafer manufacturing
and integrated circuit production facilities (e.g., SGS-Thomson and Hitachi)
and by smaller specialized product companies (e.g., Dallas Semiconductor and
Benchmarq).
Numerous companies, including major corporations possessing worldwide wafer
manufacturing and integrated circuit production facilities, manufacture DRAM
products. Because the Company's EDRAM products have certain higher
performance characteristics than standard DRAM products, however, the Company
considers only high-speed "specialty" DRAM products (such as SDRAM, CDRAM,
Rambus and Burst EDO-DRAM products manufactured by companies such as Fujitsu,
Mitsubishi, Rambus (through its licensees), LG Semicon and Micron Technology,
Inc.) to be competitive with the Company's EDRAM products. The Company also
considers its EDRAM products to be competitive in certain applications with
SRAM products, which are manufactured by major corporations, including
Alliance Semiconductor Corporation, Cypress Semiconductor Corporation,
Integrated Device Technology, Inc. and Motorola Corporation.
In addition to unaffiliated potential competitors, the Company could face
competition from its own licensees. The Company could also face competition
from start-up or established companies that decide to pursue the development
of ferroelectric or other nonvolatile semiconductor memory storage
technologies or high-speed DRAM products. A number of major domestic and
international companies have disclosed that they are researching ferroelectric
materials and technologies for use in semiconductor devices. Although the
Company protects its proprietary technology through a patent and trade secrets
program, there can be no assurance that other companies will not develop or
patent technology similar to that of the Company or reverse engineer the
Company's technology. See "Patents and Proprietary Rights" below.
The Company's ability to compete in the rapidly evolving semiconductor
marketplace depends on elements both within and beyond the control of the
Company. These factors include the Company's ability to continue to obtain
financing for its operations, to develop products in a timely manner and to
manufacture such products on a cost-effective basis, as well as the extent to
which the Company successfully introduces and the Company's customers accept
new technologies and products. Also important are the speed at which
customers incorporate the Company's products into their systems, and the
Company's access to contract manufacturers with advanced semiconductor
processes and to adequate financing, as well as general economic conditions
and the number and capabilities of the Company's competitors.
PATENTS AND PROPRIETARY RIGHTS
To protect its proprietary technology, the Company relies principally on the
maintenance of a trade secret program and the prosecution of patent
applications through the patent systems of the United States and other
countries. As of December 31, 1996, the Company held 53 unexpired United
States patents covering certain aspects of its products and technology. Such
patents will expire at various times between November 2004 and April 2015.
Three of these patents involving FRAM technology are owned jointly by Ramtron
and Seiko Epson and 10 involving DRAM technology are owned jointly by Ramtron
and Nippon Steel. As of December 31, 1996, the Company had applied for 31
additional United States patents covering certain aspects of its products and
technology. The Company has also taken steps to apply for foreign patents on
its products and technology. As of December 31, 1996, the Company held 36
unexpired foreign patents and had 59 foreign patent applications pending. A
number of the pending foreign patents will, upon issuance, be jointly owned by
the Company and either Seiko Epson or Nippon Steel.
In addition to prosecuting patents, the Company protects its proprietary
technology through a trade secret program that involves restricting access to
confidential documents and information and obtaining written confidentiality
agreements with all vendors, visitors and technical employees.
The Company believes its inventions are of fundamental importance to its
ferroelectric technology and that patents that have been issued, or allowed
but not yet issued, will provide protection against unauthorized use of the
Company's inventions. There is evidence that other companies are seeking to
develop and patent technology similar to the Company's technology.
Furthermore, other companies may seek to reverse engineer the Company's
products.
The Company does not license from others any material rights covering its
ferroelectric technology or any technology needed to manufacture its EDRAM
products. The Company does not believe that its technology infringes any
patents at this time. The Company is aware, however, that others have
obtained patents covering various semiconductor designs or processes. There
can be no assurance that third parties will not assert intellectual property
infringement claims against the Company in the future, or that any such
assertions will not require the Company to refrain from the manufacture or
sale of its products, enter into license/royalty arrangements or undertake
expensive litigation. The Company may in the future receive claims that one
or more aspects or uses of its products infringe on patents or other
intellectual property rights of third parties. If any such infringements
exist or arise in the future, the Company may be liable for damages and, like
many companies in the semiconductor industry, may find it necessary or
desirable to obtain licenses relating to third party technology incorporated
in its products. Based on industry practices, necessary licenses or rights
under patents can often be obtained on conditions not materially adverse to
the licensee. However, there can be no assurance that licenses could in fact
be obtained on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, or that litigation
would not occur. The Company's inability to obtain such licenses or the
occurrence of litigation could adversely affect the Company. See "Item 3.
Legal Proceedings."
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 1996, the Company had 105 employees, including 15 in
management and administration, 32 in research and development, 46 in
manufacturing and 12 in marketing and sales. The Company's ability to attract
and retain qualified personnel is essential to its continued success. The
majority of the Company's employees have been granted options to purchase
Common Stock pursuant to either the Company's Amended and Restated 1986 Stock
Option Plan, the 1989 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan or the 1995 Stock Option
Plan. None of the Company's employees is represented by a collective
bargaining agreement, nor has the Company ever experienced any work stoppage.
None of the Company's employees other than L. David Sikes, the Company's Chief
Executive Officer, has an employment agreement with the Company, and none of
the Company's employees has a post-employment noncompetition agreement with
the Company. The Company believes that its employee relations are good.
Item 1a. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The executive officers of the Company, and certain information about them, are
as follows:
Name Age Position
- ---- --- --------
L. David Sikes 55 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Greg B. Jones 49 Director, President and Chief Operating Officer
Elliott M. Philofsky 55 Sr. Vice President and Chief Technical Officer
Richard L. Mohr 37 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
Donald G. Carrigan 49 Vice President of Sales and Marketing
Officers are appointed by and serve at the discretion of the Board of
Directors. All officers were appointed for terms ending upon their deaths,
resignations, removal or appointment and qualification of a successor.
Mr. Sikes became the Company's Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer in April 1995 and has been a director of the Company since September
1992. Prior to becoming Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer,
Mr. Sikes was the Company's President and Chief Operating Officer from July
1992 until January 1995, at which time he left the Company and joined Micro
Component Technology Inc., a semiconductor equipment manufacturer, as
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer from January 1995 until April
1995. Prior to joining Ramtron, Mr. Sikes was President and Chief Executive
Officer of ASM America, Inc. ("ASM America"), a semiconductor equipment
company, from January 1991 until June 1992, and Executive Vice President and
General Manager of ASM Epitaxy, a semiconductor equipment manufacturer, from
February 1989 until December 1990. Prior to his tenure with ASM Epitaxy,
Mr. Sikes spent 18 years with Motorola, Inc. ("Motorola") in various
management and executive positions including Vice President and Director of
Semiconductor Research and Development Lab. His experience also includes
several management and engineering roles with Eastman Kodak and National
Semiconductor Corporation. Mr. Sikes received his Bachelor of Science degree
in Electrical Engineering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Mr. Jones became a director of the Company and the Company's President and
Chief Operating Officer in February 1995. Prior to becoming President and
Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Jones was Ramtron's Chief of Administration from
January 1995 until February 1995. Prior to joining Ramtron, Mr. Jones was
Marketing Director at Concord Services, Inc., a company owned by Mr. Benton,
from November 1993 until January 1995. From August 1990 until November 1993,
Mr. Jones served as Director of Vertical Reactors at ASM America. Prior to
his work with ASM America, Mr. Jones held a variety of management positions in
sales, marketing, corporate planning and project management. He holds a
Master of Science in Management Sciences from Stanford University and a
Bachelor of Science in Engineering from the U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis.
Dr. Philofsky joined the Company in July 1991 as Senior Vice President of
Technology and was named Senior Vice President of Technology and Manufacturing
in April 1995. In February 1996, Dr. Philofsky was named Senior Vice
President and Chief Technical Officer. Dr. Philofsky has over 26 years of
semiconductor industry experience. From July 1985 until January 1991,
Dr. Philofsky was employed by Tegal Corporation, a semiconductor equipment
manufacturer, and most recently served as its President. Before his tenure at
Tegal Corporation, Dr. Philofsky was employed by AVX Corporation where he
served as Vice President of the Integrated Capacitor Division and as Vice
President of Technology. During this time, he was deeply involved with the
properties of titanates for bulk capacitor manufacturing. PZT is the
ferroelectric titanate material used by Ramtron in its FRAM products. Prior
to joining AVX Corporation, Dr. Philofsky was Director of Motorola's
Semiconductor Research and Development Laboratory in Phoenix, Arizona, and
spent ten years with Motorola in various scientific roles. Dr. Philofsky has
published over 20 technical papers at international conferences and holds over
15 patents. Dr. Philofsky received his Bachelor of Science in Metallurgical
Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University and his Master of Science and
Doctor of Philosophy in Materials Science from Northwestern University.
Mr. Mohr joined the Company in January 1991 as Controller. In April 1994, he
was named Vice President and Controller and served in that position until
February 1995 when he was named Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer. Mr. Mohr is a certified public accountant and has over 14 years of
professional finance experience including 10 years employed with high
technology and manufacturing companies. From February 1987 until December
1990, Mr. Mohr was the Chief Financial Officer of Packaging Research
Corporation, an equipment manufacturing company. Mr. Mohr received his
Bachelor of Science in Accounting from Colorado State University and a Master
of Business Administration in Accounting and Finance from Regis University.
Mr. Carrigan joined the Company in November 1989 as Sales Manager and in July
1990 was named Director of Marketing and Sales and held that position
until October 1992, when he became Vice President of Sales. In January 1997,
Mr. Carrigan was named Vice President of Sales and Marketing. Mr. Carrigan
has over 24 years of semiconductor industry experience in research and
development, design, operations, marketing and sales. Prior to joining the
Company, Mr. Carrigan held various managerial and technical positions,
including Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Information Storage
Incorporated, an optical storage system venture between Eastman Kodak Co. and
Kawasaki Steel. He also held positions as Product and Test Engineering
Manager and Director of Marketing for INMOS Corporation; Design Manager for
NCR Microelectronics; IC Design Engineer in the Corporate Research Labs of
Texas Instruments; and Design Manager for SRAM's with the Advanced MOS Memory
Division of Texas Instruments. Mr. Carrigan received his Bachelor of Science
degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Tennessee and a Master
of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from Southern Methodist
University.
GLOSSARY
Access time or speed - The time (expressed in nanoseconds) it takes to deliver
information from a memory device after it is requested.
Bandwidth - A term to describe the amount of information that can be moved of
a specific type of connection.
Bit - An abbreviation for binary digit, of which there are two, 0 and 1. Most
semiconductor memories store information in binary form and the individual
memory cells are often referred to as bits.
Capacitor - A device for accumulating and holding a charge of electricity,
consisting of two conductors separated by a dielectric.
CMOS - Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor process technology. A
semiconductor technology that uses two types of basic transistors (p-channel
and n-channel) to build a circuit with low power and high performance.
DRAM - Dynamic Random Access Memory. A semiconductor memory device whose
stored information must be refreshed every few milliseconds.
EEPROM - Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory. A device
similar to an EPROM whose information can be erased electrically and rewritten
a limited number of times.
EPROM - Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory. An electrically programmable
memory device that can be reprogrammed by erasing the previous information by
exposing the device to ultra-violet light and rewritten a limited number of
times.
Ferroelectric Materials - A class of materials that exhibits spontaneous
polarization (the ability to be permanently polarized by an electric field
until subsequently changed).
Ferroelectric Technology - A technology that integrates ferroelectric material
into a microelectronic semiconductor structure.
Flash Memory - A nonvolatile memory that may be erased and reprogrammed
electrically. Can be programmed in the same manner as an EPROM, but is
electrically erasable.
FRAM (registered trademark) - The Company's Ferroelectric Random Access
Memory. A random access memory that employs a ferroelectric digital memory
capacitor to make it nonvolatile.
Integrated Circuit - A group of inseparably connected circuit elements formed
on a semiconductor substrate. The integrated circuit is the basis for modern
computers.
Kilobit - 1,000 bits. In reference to a memory, usually 1,024 bits since
memories are partitioned into sizes that are an exponential of two.
Megabit - 1,000,000 bits. In reference to a memory, usually 1,048,576 bits
since memories are partitioned into sizes that are an exponential of two.
Microcontroller - A fundamental digital integrated circuit computing device
programmed by the user.
Microprocessor - A computer processor contained on a integrated circuit chip.
Nanosecond - One-billionth of a second.
Nonvolatile Memory - An integrated circuit that retains information without
electrical power.
Qualification - With reference to integrated circuits, the process of testing
a representative sample of similar integrated circuits to determine that the
sample meets set standards of quality and reliability.
RAM - Random Access Memory. A memory device in which any data can be addressed
in a single operation.
Read-Write - The process of retrieving/changing information from semiconductor
memory.
ROM - Read Only Memory. A memory device that is programmed during the
manufacturing process and cannot be reprogrammed.
Silicon Wafer Underlayer - A silicon wafer manufactured through all processes
prior to application of the Company's ferroelectric processes.
SRAM - Static Random Access Memory. A semiconductor memory device that
retains its information as long as power is applied.
Volatile Memory - An integrated circuit that loses information when electrical
power is interrupted.
Item 2. PROPERTIES
The Company owns a 69,000-square foot building in Colorado Springs which
serves as its principal executive offices and as a research, development and
manufacturing facility. The facility has a Class 10 semiconductor clean room
that currently has the capability to produce and test low-density FRAM
products in limited quantities by applying its ferroelectric process to
silicon wafer underlayers obtained from suppliers. The Company's land,
building and equipment are subject to a first deed of trust and security
interest in favor of the National Electrical Benefit Fund to secure a $12
million line of credit extended to the Company in September 1995. The Company
believes that its existing facilities are adequate for its needs in the
foreseeable future for limited production of low-density FRAM products,
provided that the Company can obtain adequate supplies of silicon wafer
underlayers from contract manufacturers.
Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In 1992, a three-way "interference" contest was declared in the United States
Patent and Trademark Office (the "Patent Office") concerning a patent, which
is owned by the Company. The patent covers a basic ferroelectric memory cell
design that is of fundamental importance to the Company's business interests
in the United States. An interference is declared in the Patent Office when
two or more parties each claim to have made the same invention. The
interference proceedings are therefore conducted to determine which party is
entitled to the patent rights corresponding to the invention. In the present
interference contest, the Company is the "senior" party and is in possession
of the issued US patent. The other two parties involved in the interference
are "junior" parties, and each has the burden of proof of convincing the
Patent Office by a preponderance of the evidence that it was the first to
invent the subject matter of the invention and thus is entitled to the
corresponding patent rights. The Company and only one of the two claimant
parties in the interference proceedings filed briefs in this matter. Oral
arguments were presented before the Patent Office on March 1, 1996. A
decision by the Patent Office was originally expected within six (6) months
after the oral hearing, but due to the complexity of the case, a decision is
now expected within eighteen (18) months after the date of the oral hearing.
Such decision would complete the administrative process. The non-prevailing
party would then have the right, upon the filing of appropriate petitions, to
pursue its case in Federal Court. The Company, if the non-prevailing party,
would remain in possession of the issued US Patent while it pursues its case
in Federal Court. The Company has vigorously defended its patent rights in
this interference contest and will continue such efforts. The Company is
uncertain as to the ultimate outcome of the above matter, as well as the
associated effect upon the Company's financial position and results of
operations.
Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
On October 24, 1996, the Company held its 1996 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
(the "Annual Meeting"). At the Annual Meeting, the Company's stockholders
elected the following persons as directors of the Company. The number of
votes cast for each director, as well as the number of votes withheld, are
listed opposite each director's name:
Votes
Cast for Votes
Name of Director Director Withheld
- ----------------------------- -------- --------
L. David Sikes 23,290,335 6,229
Greg B. Jones 23,290,335 6,794
William G. Howard 23,290,335 6,794
George J. Stathakis 23,290,335 6,229
William G. Tull 23,290,335 6,229
L. T. Womack 23,290,335 6,229
At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders approved, with 22,507,593 votes cast
in favor, 96,145 votes cast against and 11,810 abstentions, the amendment to
the Company's Certificate of Incorporation to increase the authorized shares
of Common Stock of the Company from 50,000,000 to 75,000,000 shares.
PART II.
Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The Company's Common stock trades on the Nasdaq National Market tier of The
Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol "RMTR." The following table sets forth
the 1995 and 1996 ranges of the high and low closing sales prices for the
Common Stock as reported on The Nasdaq Stock Market.
High Low
------ ------
1995
- ----
First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5.75 $3.03
Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.50 3.13
Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14.38 2.97
Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.25 5.50
1996
- ----
First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.50 5.63
Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.00 5.25
Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.50 5.13
Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.38 6.00
The prices set forth above reflect transactions in the over-the-counter market
at inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and
may not necessarily represent actual transactions. On March 21, 1997, the
last reported sale of the Company's Common Stock was $6.50 per share. As of
March 21, 1997, there were approximately 2,547 record holders of the Company's
Common Stock.
The Company made no sales of equity securities during 1996 that were not
registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
DIVIDEND POLICY
The Company has not paid any dividends since its inception and does not intend
to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The Company intends to
retain any earnings to finance its operations.
Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with, and
are qualified in their entirety by, the financial statements and related notes
thereto and "Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations" included herein.
Year Ended December 31,
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
------- --------- ------- ------- --------
(in thousands, except per share data)
Operating Summary:
Revenues:
Product sales $17,942 $11,105 $ 14,221 $ 3,632 $ 59
Royalties -- 6,500 2,653 2,928 970
License and development fees 13,250 11,000 3,000 -- --
Customer-sponsored research
and development revenues 199 281 575 405 371
Costs and Expenses:
Cost of product sales 14,032 10,253 13,219 3,488 --
Research and development 13,104 11,732 16,989 19,578 14,666
Sales, general and
administrative 9,486 8,734 8,780 7,750 7,891
Operating loss (5,231) (1,833) (18,539) (23,851) (21,157)
Interest expense,
related parties 317 1,980 2,227 2,859 2,534
Net loss $(5,737) $(2,482) $(19,959) $(26,546) $(23,474)
Net loss per share $(0.16) $(0.11) $(1.14) $(1.92) $(2.16)
Weighted average
shares outstanding 36,507 21,653 17,526 13,825 10,855
December 31,
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
------- -------- -------- ------- --------
(in thousands)
Financial Position:
Working capital (deficit) $12,157 $12,695 $(18,054) $20,447 $(1,277)
Total assets 31,762 36,558 31,855 52,734 20,420
Short-term debt, related
parties -- -- 25,136 470 --
Long-term debt, related parties 3,171 2,854 -- 20,336 12,737
Total long-term debt 3,721 3,954 -- 20,358 12,794
Accumulated deficit (129,928) (124,191) (121,709) (101,750) (75,204)
Stockholders' equity (deficit) 22,272 24,463 (1,318) 18,469 4,072
Cash dividends per
common share(1) -- -- -- -- --
- --------------
(1) The Company has not declared any cash dividends on its common stock and
does not expect to pay any such dividends in the foreseeable future.
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
The following discussion and analysis is intended to provide greater details
of the results of operations and financial condition of the Company. The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with the information under
"Item 6. Selected Financial Data" and the Company's consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto and other financial data included elsewhere
herein. Certain statements under this caption constitute "forward-looking
statements" under the Reform Act which are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties. The Company's actual results may differ significantly from the
results discussed in such forward-looking statements. Factors that might
cause such a difference include but are not limited to (i) the timely
completion of the development and qualification for manufacturing of the
Company's new EDRAM and FRAM products; (ii) broader customer acceptance of its
EDRAM products and low-density FRAM products; (iii) acceptance of new high-
density FRAM products, which may be developed; (iv) the Company's and its
alliance partners' ability to manufacture its products on a cost-effective and
timely basis in the Company's own facility and through its alliance foundry
operations; (v) the Company's ability to perform under existing alliance
agreements and to develop new alliance relationships; (vi) the availability
and related cost of future financing; (vii) the retention of key personnel;
(viii) the outcome of the Company's patent interference proceedings, and (ix)
factors not directly related to the Company, such as competitive pressures on
pricing, marketing conditions in general, competition, technological
progression, product obsolescence and the changing needs of potential
customers and the semiconductor industry in general. For additional
information concerning these and other factors, see "Expected Future Results
of Operations" in this Item 7.
Since its inception, the Company has been primarily engaged in the research
and development of ferroelectric technology and the design, development and
commercialization of FRAM products and of EDRAM products. The Company has
generated revenue under license and development agreements entered into with a
limited number of established semiconductor manufacturers and involving the
development of specific applications of the Company's technologies. Revenue
has also been derived from the sale of the Company's FRAM and EDRAM products
beginning primarily in 1993, and, prior to 1996, from royalties resulting from
the sale by a licensee of products incorporating the Company's conventional
DRAM technology. Accordingly, fluctuations in the Company's revenues have
resulted primarily from the timing of the signing of license and development
agreements and the achievement of related performance milestones, and, to a
lesser extent, upon the timing of significant product orders and royalty
payments.
The Company generated minimal revenue from FRAM and EDRAM product sales prior
to 1993. For 1996, 1995 and 1994, FRAM product sales represented
approximately 11%, 10% and 11% of total product sales revenue, respectively,
while EDRAM product sales accounted for 89%, 90% and 89%, respectively, for
the same periods. During such periods, product sales revenue accounted for
approximately 57%, 38% and 70%, respectively, of total revenues, the remainder
of which were generated principally from license and development fees and
royalties earned on conventional DRAM product sales by Nippon Steel. As a
result of the Company's limited revenues as compared to its substantial
ongoing product research and development costs and high manufacturing costs,
the Company has incurred losses in each fiscal year since its inception and,
prior to 1995, required substantial capital infusions from its principal
stockholders in the form of debt and equity financing.
The Company has entered into development and licensing arrangements with
several major semiconductor manufacturers, namely Hitachi, Rohm, Toshiba,
Fujitsu, Nippon Steel and IBM, to advance the development of both its FRAM
products and EDRAM products and to provide the Company with access to advanced
semiconductor manufacturing processes and capacity for such products. In
addition to these licensing arrangements, in December 1996, the Company
entered into a license agreement with Samsung, although such arrangement does
not include any development activities between the Company and Samsung or the
availability of manufacturing capacity to the Company from Samsung.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
REVENUES. In 1996, product sales revenues increased by approximately 62% over
product sales revenues in 1995 to a total of $17.9 million, consisting of
sales of $1.9 million of FRAM products and $16.0 million of EDRAM products,
compared to total product sales revenues during 1995 of $11.1 million from the
sale of $1.1 million of FRAM products and $10.0 million of EDRAM products. The
increase in product sales revenue in 1996 as compared with 1995 resulted
primarily from an increase in the availability of the Company's EDRAM products
from its manufacturing source during 1996. The increase in EDRAM product
availability enabled the Company to fulfill during the first two quarters of
1996 a substantial customer backlog that existed at the end of 1995.
Increases in the volume of EDRAM products shipped during 1996 to new and
existing customers was tempered by a decrease in product average selling
prices during the year. Increases in FRAM product revenue during 1996
resulted from the increased availability of FRAM products and increases in
volumes of FRAM products sold associated with the Company's 16-kilobit FRAM
products and RF/ID FRAM products. The 22% reduction in product sales revenue
in 1995 as compared with the same period in 1994 resulted primarily from a
shortage of EDRAM product caused by a cessation in EDRAM production from
Nippon Steel, the Company's only EDRAM manufacturing source at that time. The
Company ceased production of its EDRAM products in April 1994 in response to
excess inventory levels. This earlier cessation of production together with
increased customer demand and the reluctance of Nippon Steel to manufacture
products for the Company due to the Company's weak financial position at that
time, resulted in shortages of product availability in 1995 and a shortfall in
expected sales revenues. Product revenues in 1994 were $14.2 million
consisting of sales of $1.6 million of FRAM products and $12.6 million of
EDRAM products. FRAM product revenues in 1994 were primarily attributable to
FRAM product sales to a major video game manufacturer. The transition in
video games from game cartridges to compact discs from 1994 to 1995 reduced
the demand for such game cartridges and subsequently led to the decrease in
FRAM revenue from 1994 to 1995.
In 1996, 1995 and 1994, the Company recognized license and development fee
revenues of $13.3 million, $11.0 million and $3.0 million, respectively. The
Company's license fee revenues during 1996 resulted from the achievement of
milestones pursuant to existing license arrangements, the granting of a new
license for the use of the Company's ferroelectric technology and the granting
of FRAM product designs to an existing licensee. Revenues from licensing
activities during 1996 were recognized from Hitachi, Rohm, Toshiba, Fujitsu
and Samsung. The Company's license fee revenue for 1995 resulted from the
grant of licenses in the Company's ferroelectric technology to Toshiba,
Fujitsu, Hitachi and Rohm, and to Racom and Intag for use in certain RF/ID
applications. In 1994, license fee revenue resulted from the Company's grant
of licenses to the Company's ferroelectric technology to Hitachi and Rohm.
In 1996 the Company recorded no royalty revenues. In 1995 and 1994, the
Company recorded royalty revenues of $6.5 million and $2.7 million,
respectively, from Nippon Steel's sales of conventional DRAM products designed
and developed by the Company. The royalty revenue recognized during 1995,
represents the payment of all royalties payable by Nippon Steel on sales of
conventional 1-megabit and 4-megabit DRAM products subsequent to 1994. That
payment was made in connection with the May 1995 sale to Nippon Steel of the
Company's equity interest in United Memories, Inc. ("UMI"), the joint-venture
company formed by Ramtron and Nippon Steel to design and develop advanced
semiconductor memory products. Under the terms of the UMI sale agreement, the
Company will not receive additional royalty revenue from Nippon Steel for
periods subsequent to 1995.
In 1996, customer-sponsored research and development revenues totaled $.2
million and were primarily attributable to design and development agreements
with a number of companies, of which the Company recorded not more than
$35,000 of revenue from any one company. In 1995, customer-sponsored research
and development revenues totaled $.3 million primarily attributable to joint
research and development agreements with Racom, Intag and Hitachi, as compared
to $.6 million for the same period in 1994, which was primarily attributable
to joint research and development agreements with Racom, Intag and Matsushita.
COST OF PRODUCT SALES. In 1996, 1995 and 1994, cost of product sales as a
percentage of product revenues were 78%, 92% and 93%, respectively. The
improvement in the cost of product sales as a percentage of product revenues
in 1996 over the same period in 1995 relates directly to the Company's EDRAM
products. Increased sales volume, favorable average selling prices and lower
supply costs for the Company's EDRAM products were the primary reasons leading
to the improved cost of product sales percentage for 1996. Cost of product
sales as a percentage of product revenues for EDRAM products is expected to
continue to improve during 1997 as the Company's production costs decrease.
The expected improvement in the cost of EDRAM product sales is directly
related to the Company's ability to maintain reasonable average selling prices
at levels comparable or slightly under the average selling price levels which
existed at the end of 1996, although there can be no assurance the Company
will be able to maintain such average selling prices during 1997. The cost of
product sales as a percentage of product revenues for the Company's FRAM
products was approximately 97% for each of 1996, 1995 and 1994. The overall
cost of product sales has remained high due primarily to the Company's
introduction of new FRAM and EDRAM product designs, low volume of
manufacturing and changes in the manufacturing processes. Furthermore, the
low manufacturing volume of FRAM products has resulted in higher costs
associated with the Company's CMOS underlayer supply and external packaging
and testing services. Slight improvements in the cost of product sales as a
percentage of product revenues for FRAM products are expected during 1997 as
manufacturing efficiencies are achieved at the Company's facility and through
the use of the advanced semiconductor manufacturing processes and facilities
of the Company's foundry alliances, assuming successful completion of
development and product qualification. The expected improvement in the cost
of product sales as a percentage of product revenues for the Company's EDRAM
products is expected to occur as a result of an overall cost improvement from
the Company's foundries as their prices to the Company are adjusted downward
in relation to standard DRAM pricing.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. In 1996, research and development expenses
increased by $1.4 million (12%) as compared with the same period in 1995, due
primarily to the expensing of a non-recurring, non-cash Employee Incentive
Program approved by the Company's stockholders in December 1995 and terminated
in December 1996. Such research and development incentive expense totaled
approximately $1.8 million in 1996, the absence of which would have resulted
in a decrease in research and development expenses in 1996 as compared to the
same period in 1995 of approximately $.4 million (3%). Approximately
$.1 million of such incentive expense was recorded in 1995. The decrease
in research and development costs is primarily related to a decrease in
manufacturing volumes associated with the Company's research and development
activities. Research and development expenses are expected to increase during
1997, absent the incentive expense referred to above, as the Company develops
new products and processes and supports its existing and expected new alliance
partners in continued FRAM and EDRAM product development. In 1995, research
and development expenses decreased by $5.0 million (30%) as compared with the
same period in 1994, primarily due to decreases in costs associated with the
purchase of semiconductor wafers used for production of FRAM products and
decreased manufacturing volumes associated with research and development
activities.
CUSTOMER-SPONSORED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES. In 1996, customer-
sponsored research and development expenses were primarily related to design
development services with eleven different customers, of which expenses
decreased by $64,000 (26%) as compared with the same period in 1995.
Customer-sponsored research and development expenses for 1995, related
primarily to the joint research and development efforts with Racom, Intag and
Hitachi, which expenses decreased $.3 million (55%) as compared to 1994.
SALES, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. In 1996, sales, general and administrative
expenses increased by $.8 million (9%) as compared with the same period in
1995, due primarily to the expensing of a non-recurring, non-cash Employee
Incentive Program approved by the Company's stockholders in December 1995 and
terminated in December 1996. Such sales, general and administrative
incentive expense totaled approximately $1.1 million in 1996, the absence of
which would have resulted in a decrease in sales, general and administrative
expenses in 1996 as compared to the same period in 1995 of approximately $.3
million (4%). Approximately $.1 million of such incentive expense was
recorded in 1995. Such decrease in sales, general and administrative expenses
in 1996 as compared to the same period in 1995 relates primarily to a decrease
in withholding taxes associated with the Company's licensing and royalty
arrangements. Increases in product sales commissions paid to distributors and
reps during 1996 associated with increased product sales revenues partially
offset such decreases in sales, general and administrative expenses mentioned
above. In 1995, sales, general and administrative expenses remained flat as
compared with 1994.
INTEREST EXPENSE. In 1996 and 1995, interest expense, related parties
decreased by $1.7 million (84%) and $.2 million (11%), respectively, as
compared with 1995 and 1994, respectively. Such decreases were primarily due
to the conversion of debt to equity of approximately $27.0 million of related
party notes payable and associated accrued interest, pursuant to a 1995 debt
conversion agreement.
GAIN ON DISPOSITION OF EQUITY INVESTMENTS. In 1995, the Company recorded a
gain of $.8 million on the disposition of its equity investment in UMI. In
May 1995, the Company entered into an agreement with Nippon Steel whereby the
Company sold to Nippon Steel for $1.5 million all of Ramtron's voting and
nonvoting common stock in UMI.
EXPECTED FUTURE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Company is continuing its efforts to improve and increase commercial
production and sales of its EDRAM products and low-density FRAM products,
decrease the cost of producing such products and develop and commercialize new
high and low-density FRAM products and enhancements to its existing FRAM and
EDRAM products. The Company expects revenues will continue to be sporadic in
the foreseeable future until the Company's products gain wider market
acceptance, new license arrangements are entered into and milestones under the
Company's existing and any new license and development agreements are
achieved.
The Company's ability to significantly increase product sales and achieve
profitability will depend on several factors, including: (i) the completion of
the development and qualification for manufacturing of the Company's high-
density FRAM products; (ii) the completion of the development and
qualification for manufacturing of the Company's EDRAM products with densities
both greater than and less than its existing 4-megabit density; (iii) wider
customer acceptance of its EDRAM products and low-density FRAM products; (iv)
market acceptance of new high and low-density FRAM products which may be
developed; (v) the Company's ability to manufacture its products on a cost-
effective and timely basis in its own facility and through alliance foundry
operations; (vi) the availability and related cost of future financing; and
(vii) factors not directly related to the Company, including market
conditions, competition, technological progression, product obsolescence and
the changing needs of potential customers and the semiconductor industry in
general.
To gain access to advanced CMOS manufacturing processes and facilities,
Ramtron has entered into manufacturing alliances and licensing agreements for
FRAM products with companies having or constructing advanced memory products
manufacturing capability, including Rohm, Hitachi, Toshiba and Fujitsu. Since
the purchase or construction of an advanced manufacturing facility capable of
mass producing memory devices would require a capital outlay well beyond the
Company's current capital resources, the Company believes that the most
suitable alternative is this strategic-alliance approach which the Company
believes will enable it to develop, manufacture and sell FRAM products more
rapidly and cost-effectively than any other available alternative. Ramtron's
intention is to utilize current and future alliance relationships as foundry
sources for FRAM products in order to provide the Company with low-cost, high-
volume, high quality FRAM products for resale to customers. The Company is
also exploring opportunities with potential licensing partners to have such
partners update the Company's existing fabrication facility in Colorado
Springs, Colorado by providing state-of-the-art manufacturing equipment in
lieu of license payments and then sharing manufacturing output of such
facility. The Company signed a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") with SGS-
Thomson incorporating terms similar to these, but no definitive agreement
concerning such facility upgrade exists at this time and there can be no
assurance that a final agreement incorporating such terms will be entered
into. (See "Pursue Strategic Development and Manufacturing Alliances" above.)
The Company intends to produce EDRAMs through strategic alliances with major
semiconductor companies and to expand the market for EDRAMs by making EDRAM
products available from multiple sources. This approach avoids the high
capital costs associated with DRAM manufacturing that would have otherwise
been incurred by the Company if it had chosen to manufacture these products
with Company-provided resources.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Since its inception, the Company has relied on its stockholders, and
particularly, since 1989, on Oren L. Benton and the National Electrical
Benefit Fund, to provide working capital for its operations. Throughout 1992,
1993, 1994 and, in the case of the Fund, through the first four months of
1995, Mr. Benton and the Fund financed the Company's operations through a
series of equity investments and loans; most of such loans were subsequently
converted into equity. In February 1995, Mr. Benton filed for protection
under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. As a result of
Mr. Benton's personal bankruptcy, the Company could no longer continue to rely
on Mr. Benton as a source of financing, nor on the Fund under terms that would
have been available had Mr. Benton and the Fund continued to fund the Company
together. In September 1995, the Company successfully completed a debt
conversion plan which provided for the conversion of a significant portion of
its outstanding debt into equity, and in connection therewith, the Company
received a new $12 million credit facility from the Fund. The Company has
been successful in financing its working capital requirements from its
operations since May 1995 and has not required any additional financing from
the Fund or any other outside resource since that time.
Net cash used in operating activities was $3.0 million in 1996 compared with
$1.3 million provided by operations in 1995. The $4.3 million increase in net
cash used in operations in 1996 when compared with 1995 resulted primarily
from a significant increase in accounts receivable and inventories during the
last half of 1996. Accounts receivable increased in 1996 by $4.2 million over
1995 primarily as a result of a new license agreement signed in late December
1996. The first payment pursuant to the terms of that license agreement in the
amount of $3.0 million was received in early January 1997. Inventories
increased as of the end of 1996 by $1.8 million resulting from production
decisions made during the third quarter of 1996 pertaining to the
Company's EDRAM products. Manufacturing starts have since been slowed to
bring EDRAM inventories to an optimum level to maximize the Company's
inventory turns and cash flows from product sales and yet provide product to
the Company's customers in a timely manner. A major source of cash provided
by operating activities during 1996 resulted from the Company applying EDRAM
production security deposits of $5.4 million held by Nippon Steel at the end
of 1995, to purchase EDRAM products during 1996. As of December 31, 1996,
Nippon Steel no longer required a deposit to secure production of such EDRAM
products and the amount left on deposit with Nippon Steel at the end of 1996
was negligible. Net cash provided by operating activities in 1995 of $1.3
million increased by $19.5 million from net cash used in operating activities
in 1994 of $18.2 million. The $19.5 million increase in cash provided by
operations in 1995 when compared to 1994 resulted primarily from a $17.5
million improvement in the Company's net loss for the year and from the
prepayment of license fees from certain license partners which was recorded as
deferred revenue.
Net cash used in investing activities was $.6 million in 1996 compared to net
cash provided by investing activities of $1.3 million in 1995. The $1.9
million decrease in net cash provided by investing activities in 1996 when
compared with 1995 resulted primarily from a decrease in the proceeds from the
sale of assets. In 1995, the Company entered into an agreement with Nippon
Steel under which the Company sold its interest in UMI, a jointly owned DRAM
design resource, to Nippon Steel for $1.5 million. No such transaction
occurred in 1996. The purchase of capital equipment and facility
modifications increased by $.2 million (37%) in 1996 when compared with 1995
and was primarily related to the addition of new test equipment, the
improvement of existing manufacturing equipment and the purchase of computer
related equipment used primarily in research and development activities. Net
cash provided by investing activities of $1.3 million in 1995, increased by
$2.2 million from net cash used in investing activities in 1994 of $.9
million. The $2.2 million increase in cash provided by investing activities in
1995 when compared to 1994 resulted primarily from the proceeds received from
the sale of a jointly owned DRAM design resource of $1.5 million as well as a
reduction in the purchase of capital equipment by $1.1 million.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $.5 million in 1996 compared
with $3.5 million in 1995. The $3.0 decrease in net cash provided by
financing activities in 1996 when compared with 1995 resulted primarily from
the Company's ability to cash flow its operations with internally generated
cash flows and therefore requiring no additional outside funding. In 1995,
the Company received approximately $2.6 million in outside funding pursuant to
a $12.0 million line of credit with the Fund, one of the Company's principal
shareholders. Net cash provided by financing activities of $3.5 million in
1995, increased by $1.0 million from net cash provided by financing activities
in 1994 of $2.5 million. The $1.0 million increase in cash provided by
financing activities in 1995 when compared to 1994 resulted primarily from the
proceeds received from the sale of the Company's stock associated with the
exercise of employee stock options. Net cash provided by financing activities
of $2.5 million in 1994, decreased by $43.6 million from net cash provided by
financing activities in 1993 of $46.1 million.
During 1996, the Company received approximately $6.3 million in cash relating
to milestone achievements, license expansion agreements and product design
programs with existing FRAM technology license partners. Milestone
payments pursuant to these agreements are expected to create additional cash
flows during 1997 and 1998 subject to the fulfillment of certain milestone
conditions. The Company also recorded an increase in product sales of
approximately $6.8 million (62%) in 1996 creating an additional source of cash
flow for the Company. An increase in product sales activity and new license
arrangements are anticipated in 1997. No additional draws on the Company's
$12 million credit facility with the Fund were made during 1996 leaving an
available balance of $9.4 million as of December 31,1996.
During 1997, the Company intends to finance its operations by relying on its
existing cash resources at December 31, 1996 of approximately $3.2 million,
expected cash receipts from new license agreements, cash receipts from the
sale of the Company's products, and license and milestone payments to the
Company on existing license agreements of approximately $9.0 million. The
Company received $3.0 million of such license and milestone payments in
January 1997. The remaining $6 million of license payments are payable in
part upon (i) the first sale of product by a certain licensee or in December
1997, whichever occurs first, and (ii) the completion of two preliminary
designs for a certain licensee. If certain of these development milestones
are not met during 1997, the resulting loss of license revenues to the Company
could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations or
financial condition. If required, the Company also has amounts available to
it under its credit facility with the Fund of approximately $9.4 million as of
December 31, 1996. Such credit facility agreement does not contain any
special requirements for the Company to satisfy any performance criteria or
specific financial covenants other than those typically found in standard
commercial credit agreements in order for the Company to borrow amounts
pursuant to the credit facility.
The Company anticipates that during 1997, the level of the Company's operating
expenses will increase to support anticipated sales growth and to further the
research and development efforts associated with internal product development
and to support existing and potential new licensing partners. The Company
anticipates an increase in capital equipment expenditures during 1997 to
fulfill certain manufacturing requirements for both FRAM and EDRAM products.
The Company will pursue leasing arrangements to finance such capital equipment
purchases, although there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to
arrange such financing, or if financing is available, if it will be on terms
acceptable to the Company.
Based on the Company's capital resources as of December 31, 1996 and amounts
available to the Company under its credit facility with the Fund and based on
expected near term revenues and operating costs, the Company expects to be
able to fund its operations through at least 1997. The Company's future
capital requirements include financing the growth of working capital items
such as accounts receivable and inventory and the purchase of equipment. The
Company is continuing to pursue additional license and development
arrangements with third parties and will continue to seek reasonable sources
of capital to satisfy its future operating and working capital requirements,
but it has not yet identified any specific new sources of capital.
Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Financial Statements: Page
Report of Independent Public Accountants F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations
for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 F-3
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 F-5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-6 to F-18
Financial Statement Schedules:
Schedule II: Valuation and Qualifying Accounts F-19
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Ramtron International Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ramtron
International Corporation (a Delaware corporation) as of December 31, 1996 and
1995, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1996. These financial statements and the schedule referred
to below are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and
schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Ramtron International
Corporation as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1996, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The schedule listed in the index of
financial statements is presented for purposes of complying with the
Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and is not a required part of the
basic financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing
procedures applied in our audit of the basic financial statements and, in our
opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole.
/S/ Arthur Andersen LLP
Denver, Colorado,
February 7, 1997.
RAMTRON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 1996 and 1995
(in thousands, except par value amounts)
-------------
1996 1995
-------- ---------
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 3,182 $ 6,283
Accounts receivable, less allowances
of $721 and $284, respectively 6,810 2,599
Inventories 7,342 5,552
Deposits 20 5,445
Prepaid expenses 503 839
Other current assets 69 118
------- -------
Total current assets 17,926 20,836
Property, plant and equipment, net 8,697 10,169
Intangible assets, net 5,118 5,532
Other assets 21 21
------- -------
$31,762 $36,558
======= =======
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 1,992 $ 3,347
Accrued liabilities 1,202 1,516
Accrued royalties 612 229
License rights 1,100 550
Deferred revenue 863 2,499
------- -------
Total current liabilities 5,769 8,141
Long-term promissory note and accrued
interest, related party 3,171 2,854
Long-term license rights 550 1,100
------- -------
Total liabilities 9,490 12,095
------- -------
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 7 and 14)
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 10,000 shares
authorized: no shares issued and outstanding -- --
Common Stock, $.01 par value, 75,000 shares
authorized: 36,997 and 36,387 issued and
outstanding, respectively 370 364
Additional paid-in capital 151,830 148,290
Accumulated deficit (129,928) (124,191)
------- -------
Total stockholders' equity 22,272 24,463
------- -------
$31,762 $36,558
======= =======
See accompanying notes.
RAMTRON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
-------------
1996 1995 1994
-------- -------- --------
Revenue:
Product Sales $17,942 $11,105 $14,221
Royalties -- 6,500 2,653
License and development fees 13,250 11,000 3,000
Customer-sponsored research
and development 199 281 575
-------- -------- --------
31,391 28,886 20,449
-------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Cost of product sales 14,032 10,253 13,219
Research and development 12,925 11,489 16,454
Customer-sponsored research
and development 179 243 535
Sales, general and administrative 9,486 8,734 8,780
-------- -------- --------
36,622 30,719 38,988
Operating loss (5,231) (1,833) (18,539)
Interest expense, related parties (317) (1,980) (2,227)
Gain on sale of equity investment -- 788 --
Other income (expense), net (189) 543 807
-------- -------- --------
Net loss $(5,737) $(2,482) $(19,959)
======== ======== ========
Net loss per share $(0.16) $(0.11) $(1.14)
======== ======== ========
Weighted average shares outstanding 36,507 21,653 17,526
======== ======== ========
See accompanying notes.
RAMTRON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
(in thousands)
--------------
1996 1995 1994
-------- -------- --------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss $(5,737) $(2,482) $(19,959)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
Stock based compensation 2,910 -- --
Depreciation and amortization 2,860 3,020 2,961
Interest expense from conversion of
promissory notes -- 1,726 --
Gain on sale of assets (85) (788) (708)
Other -- 38 166
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (4,211) 1,006 (1,400)
Inventories (1,790) 5,651 3,889
Deposits 5,425 (5,445) --
Prepaid expenses 336 (776) (93)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (1,137) (2,750) (2,845)
Long-term accrued interest, related parties 317 254 --
Deferred revenue (1,636) 2,326 (411)
Other (281) (470) 178
-------- -------- --------
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities (3,029) 1,310 (18,222)
-------- -------- --------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment (750) (548) (1,668)
Investment in joint venture -- (15) (78)
Proceeds from sale of assets 192 1,875 833
-------- -------- --------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities (558) 1,312 (913)
-------- -------- --------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from notes payable, related parties -- 3,579 6,046
Payments on notes payable, related parties -- (810) (3,715)
Payments of long-term debt and capital
lease obligations -- (22) (41)
Payments on license rights payable -- (500) --
Issuance of common stock, net of expenses 486 1,233 172
-------- -------- --------
Net cash provided by financing
activities 486 3,480 2,462
-------- -------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents (3,101) 6,102 (16,673)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 6,283 181 16,854
-------- -------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 3,182 $ 6,283 $ 181
======== ======== ========
See accompanying notes.
RAMTRON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
(in thousands, except par value amounts)
--------------
Convertible
Preferred Stock Common Stock
($.01) Par Value ($.01) Par Value Additional Total
---------------- ---------------- Paid-in Accumulated Stockholders'
Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Deficit Equity(Deficit)
------ ------ ------ ------ ---------- ----------- ---------------
Balances, December 31, 1993 3,334 $33 14,310 $143 $120,043 $(101,750) $18,469
Issuance of stock:
Exercise of options -- -- 148 2 258 -- 260
Conversion of Series B preferred stock (3,334) (33) -- -- -- -- (33)
From conversion of Series B preferred
stock to Series C preferred stock
and common stock 3,334 33 3,334 33 (33) -- 33
Stock issuance costs -- -- -- -- (88) -- (88)
Net loss for year ended December 31, 1994 -- -- -- -- -- (19,959) (19,959)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balances, December 31, 1994 3,334 33 17,792 178 120,180 (121,709) (1,318)
Issuance of stock:
Conversion of promissory notes -- -- 8,773 88 26,942 -- 27,030
Exercise of options -- -- 314 3 1,451 -- 1,454
Conversion of Series C preferred stock (3,334) (33) 9,508 95 (62) -- --
Stock issuance costs -- -- -- -- (221) -- (221)
Net loss for year ended December 31, 1995 -- -- -- -- -- (2,482) (2,482)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balances, December 31, 1995 -- -- 36,387 364 148,290 (124,191) 24,463
Issuance of stock:
Stock based compensation -- -- 429 4 3,056 -- 3,060
Exercise of options -- -- 182 2 673 -- 675
Cancellation of treasury stock -- -- (1) -- (13) -- (13)
Stock issuance costs -- -- -- -- (176) -- (176)
Net loss for year ended December 31, 1996 -- -- -- -- -- (5,737) (5,737)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balances, December 31, 1996 -- $-- 36,997 $370 $151,830 $(129,928) $22,272
==========================================================================
See accompanying notes.
RAMTRON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
------------------------
1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS. Ramtron International Corporation (the "Company")
designs, develops, manufactures and markets high-performance specialty
semiconductor memory devices. The Company has two product lines,
ferroelectric nonvolatile random access memory (FRAM (registered trademark))
products and high-speed DRAM products, called Enhanced-DRAM (EDRAM) products.
To date, the Company has generated revenue principally under license and
development arrangements entered into with a limited number of established
semiconductor manufacturers and involving the development of specific
applications of the Company's technologies and beginning in 1993 from the sale
of its FRAM and EDRAM products. Product sales (primarily EDRAM) have been
made to various customers for use in a variety of applications including
consumer electronics, telecommunications, accelerator boards, disk controllers
and industrial control devices. During 1996, 1995 and 1994, the Company's
revenues have been derived from several customers within these industries
(Note 10).
USE OF ESTIMATES. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION. The accompanying financial statements include
the consolidation of accounts for the Company's wholly owned subsidiaries,
Enhanced Memory Systems, Inc. ("EMS"), which was created in May 1995 and
Ramtron Kabushiki Kaisha ("Ramtron K.K."), which was created in July 1996.
The Company formed the wholly owned subsidiary, EMS, to operate its EDRAM
business. The Company formed Ramtron K.K., to act in a sales and marketing
role within Japan for the Company's products and to function as a liaison
between the Company and its Japan alliance partners. To date, Ramtron K.K.
has had limited operations. All material intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
REVENUE RECOGNITION. Revenue from product sales to direct customers is
recognized upon shipment. The Company defers recognition of sales to
distributors which allow rights of return and price protection until
distributors have resold the products.
Royalty revenue is recognized upon the Company's fulfillment of its
contractual obligations and determination of a fixed royalty amount, or, in
the case of ongoing unit royalties, upon sales by the licensee of royalty-
bearing products, as estimated by the Company.
Revenue from the sale of licenses of technology which are nonrefundable and
for which no significant future obligations exist is recognized when the
license is signed. Revenue from the sale of licenses which are refundable or
for which future obligations exist is recognized when the Company has
completed its obligations under the license. Certain research and development
activities are conducted for third parties and such revenue is recognized as
the services are performed.
INVENTORIES. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. The
first-in, first-out method of costing inventories is used.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT. Property, plant and equipment are stated at
cost and depreciation and amortization are provided using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Maintenance
and repairs are expensed as incurred and improvements are capitalized.
The cost of assets sold or retired and the related accumulated depreciation or
amortization are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is
reflected in the consolidated statements of operations in the period in which
such sale or disposition occurs.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS. Intangible assets are recorded at cost and are amortized
over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method.
INCOME TAXES. The Company recognizes deferred income tax assets and
liabilities for the expected future income tax consequences, based on enacted
tax laws, of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax
bases of assets, liabilities and carryovers. The Company recognizes deferred
tax assets for the expected future effects of all deductible temporary
differences, loss carryovers and tax credit carryovers. Deferred tax assets
are then reduced, if deemed necessary, by a valuation allowance for the amount
of any tax benefits which, more likely than not, based on current
circumstances, are not expected to be realized (Note 12).
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS. For purposes of the consolidated statements of
cash flows, the Company considers all cash and highly liquid investments
purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents.
NET LOSS PER SHARE. Net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by
the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each
period presented. Certain common stock options and warrants are common stock
equivalents, however, they have not been included in net loss per share
calculations due to their antidilutive effect.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS. In March 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board issued SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of." SFAS No. 121 requires that
long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be held and used by
an entity be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 121 during 1996.
The adoption of SFAS No. 121 did not have a significant impact on the
Company's consolidated financial position and results of operations.
RECLASSIFICATIONS. Certain reclassifications to prior years' financial
statements have been made to conform to the current year's presentation.
2. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES:
During 1995, several significant events occurred which affected the Company's
liquidity and capital resources. These events included the conversion of
substantially all of its outstanding debt and related accrued interest to
common stock of the Company, the receipt of approximately $11.0 million in
cash relating to the sale of nonexclusive, nontransferable technology licenses
to third parties and the execution of a credit facility with the National
Electrical Benefit Fund (the "Fund"), a principal stockholder, for a total of
$12.0 million, of which $2.6 million was drawn during 1995.
During 1996, the Company received approximately $6.3 million in cash relating
to milestone achievements, license expansion agreements and product design
programs with existing FRAM technology license partners. Milestone
payments pursuant to these agreements are expected to create additional cash
flows during 1997 and 1998. The Company also applied cash deposits held by a
foundry source in 1995 of approximately $5.4 million to purchase EDRAM
products manufactured by such foundry during 1996. Further, product sales
increased by 62% or approximately $6.8 million during 1996 creating an
additional source of cash flow for the Company. No additional draws on the
Company's $12 million credit facility with the Fund were made during 1996.
Due to the factors discussed above and other factors, management believes that
existing financial resources at December 31, 1996, as well as expected 1997
cash flows from operations will enable the Company to continue as a going
concern through at least December 31, 1997. These resources include existing
cash at December 31, 1996 of approximately $3.2 million, expected cash
receipts from new license agreements, cash receipts from the sale of the
Company's products, available amounts under its credit facility of
approximately $9.4 million, and license and milestone payments to the Company
on existing license agreements of approximately $9.0 million. The Company
received $3 million of such license and milestone payments in January 1997.
3. INVENTORIES:
Inventories consist of:
December 31,
------------------
1996 1995
------ ------
(in thousands)
Finished goods $6,174 $3,149
Work in process 1,055 2,115
Raw materials 113 288
------ ------
$7,342 $5,552
====== ======
4. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:
Property, plant and equipment consists of:
Estimated December 31,
Useful Lives -----------------
(In Years) 1996 1995
------------ ------- -------
(in thousands)
Land -- $ 668 $ 668
Buildings and improvements 18 and 10 8,750 8,704
Equipment 5 12,058 11,777
Office furniture and equipment 5 621 579
Equipment held under capital lease obligations 5 19 --
------- -------
22,116 21,728
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (13,419) (11,559)
------- -------
$ 8,697 $10,169
======= =======
Depreciation and amortization expense for property, plant and equipment was
$2,115,000, $2,621,000, and $2,675,000 for 1996, 1995, and 1994, respectively.
Maintenance and repairs expense was $443,000, $415,000, and $614,000 for 1996,
1995 and 1994, respectively.
5. INTANGIBLE ASSETS:
Intangible assets consist of:
Estimated December 31,
Useful Lives ---------------
(In Years) 1996 1995
------------ ------ ------
(in thousands)
Patents and trademarks 10 $2,690 $2,359
License rights 5 2,150 2,150
Costs in excess of net assets purchased 17 4,529 4,529
------ ------
9,369 9,038
Less accumulated amortization (4,251) (3,506)
------ ------
$5,118 $5,532
====== ======
In August 1995, the Company entered into a cross license agreement with a
third party regarding the use of certain ferroelectric technology in the
development and production of ferroelectric integrated circuit memories. The
Company is required to pay a technology license fee in four annual
installments to the third party as consideration for certain rights received
under the cross license agreement. Such license fee is included in intangible
assets for the year ending December 31, 1996 and is being amortized over the
five-year term of the cross license agreement.
Amortization expense of intangible assets was $745,000, $391,000, and $286,000
for 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
6. INVESTMENTS IN JOINT VENTURES:
In 1991, the Company sold a license to Racom Systems, Inc. ("Racom") to use
the Company's ferroelectric technology in certain applications in exchange for
an initial license fee, future license fees and royalties and one-third of the
capital stock of Racom. In February 1995, the Company and Racom amended their
nonexclusive license agreement and the Company, in exchange for a license fee
of $1,000,000 and shares representing approximately 10% of the outstanding
shares of Racom common stock, agreed to extend the exclusive supply period
provision of the license agreement to the end of the year 2005. As of
December 31, 1996, the Company's ownership interest in Racom was approximately
42%. The Company has recorded its investment in Racom at a nominal amount.
The Company has no commitments to fund the operations of Racom and,
accordingly, has not recorded losses in excess of its investment.
7. COMMITMENTS:
LEASE COMMITMENTS. The Company has approximately $559,000 in commitments
under noncancelable operating leases expiring in 2002 for various equipment.
Total rent expense on all operating leases was $393,000, $193,000, and
$431,000 for 1996, 1995, and 1994, respectively.
EMPLOYMENT SECURITY PROGRAM. In May 1995, the Board of Directors of the
Company adopted, and in December 1995 the Company's stockholders approved, an
Employment Security Program (the "Severance Plan") pursuant to which
substantially all full-time employees of the Company on May 18, 1995 were
entitled to receive severance pay and accrued vacation pay following
involuntary termination of employment initiated after May 18, 1995 and on or
before October 25, 1996. The Employment Security Program terminated on
October 25, 1996, and no employee received benefits under this program.
INCENTIVE PROGRAM. In May 1995, the Board of Directors of the Company
adopted, and in December 1995 the Company's stockholders approved, an
Incentive Program pursuant to which the Company would, in December 1996, award
bonuses payable in cash or the Company's common stock to eligible employees of
the Company. The purposes of the Incentive Program were to retain and
motivate employees of the Company in order to ensure the growth and success of
the Company. Under the Incentive Program, on October 25, 1996, the Company
established an employee bonus pool in the amount equal to the principal amount
of the funds initially set aside by the Company for the Company's Severance
Plan less the amount of any severance payments made by the Company to its
employees under the Severance Plan above. As of October 25, 1996, the
amount of the bonus pool was $1,502,769.
On December 2, 1996, the Company would distribute to eligible employees of the
Company all of the funds in the bonus pool. Employees eligible to receive a
distribution on December 2, 1996 could elect to receive their distribution
either in cash or in common stock of the Company. If an employee elected to
receive their distribution in common stock, the number of shares distributed
to the employee would be equal to the total cash value of the employee's
distribution divided by $3.50, which amount approximated the last reported
sale price for the Company's common stock as reported on The Nasdaq Stock
Market on April 26, 1995. On December 2, 1996, all employees eligible to
receive a distribution pursuant to the Incentive Program elected to receive
their distributions in common stock of the Company. The Incentive Program
terminated on December 2, 1996 after the distribution thereunder had been
made.
The Company accounted for the Incentive Program by amortizing the total
estimated expense of the Incentive Program evenly over the period of time
between the date of shareholder approval of the plan, December 15, 1995, and
the bonus pool distribution date of December 2, 1996. The total expense of
the Incentive Program was estimated on a quarterly basis and was determined
based upon either the minimum cash payout or the market price of the Company's
common stock if such market price was in excess of $3.50 per share. During
1996 and 1995, the Company expensed approximately $2,910,000 and $150,000,
respectively, under the Incentive Program.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT. The Company has an employment agreement with an
employee, which provides for certain payments and continuation of benefits
should his employment terminate as defined in the employment agreement.
8. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
SERIES C CONVERTIBLE PERFORMANCE RIGHT PREFERRED STOCK. In December 1993, the
Company issued through a private placement, 1,685,000 shares of its Series B
convertible preferred stock, $.01 par value, for $15,162,000 ($9.00 per share)
of cash. Concurrently, the Company elected to convert $14,840,000 of
convertible promissory notes issued to its two principal stockholders into
1,649,000 shares of Series B convertible preferred stock under the same terms
as the private placement. In January 1994, each share of Series B convertible
preferred stock automatically converted into one share of common stock and one
share of Series C convertible performance right preferred stock, $.01 par
value ("Series C preferred stock"). Such conversion occurred at the time the
Company registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission the resale of
the common stock and Series C preferred stock. On December 15, 1995, all
outstanding Series C preferred stock totaling 3,333,565 shares converted into
approximately 9,507,650 shares of the Company's common stock pursuant to the
terms of such preferred stock. As of December 31, 1996, there was no
preferred stock issued and outstanding.
WARRANTS. Warrants to purchase shares of the Company's common stock,
including warrants issued to related parties (Note 9), are as follows:
Number of Shares
-----------------------------
(in thousands)
Exercise Principal
Price Per Share Stockholders Others Total
--------------- ------------ ------ -----
Outstanding and exercisable
at December 31, 1993 $9.80-$35.00 6,849 -- 6,849
Cancelled $9.80 (960) -- (960)
-----------------------------
Outstanding and exercisable
at December 31, 1994 $9.80-$52.50 5,889 -- 5,889
Granted $4.15 11,018 1,100 12,118
Cancelled $4.15-$52.50 (9,918) (1,100) (11,018)
-----------------------------
Outstanding and exercisable
at December 31, 1995 $4.15 6,989 -- 6,989
-----------------------------
Outstanding and exercisable
at December 31, 1996 $4.15 6,989 -- 6,989
=============================
All of the above warrants as of December 31, 1996 have a per share exercise
price of $4.15, are currently exercisable and expire in August 2000. The
Company has determined that all outstanding warrants had a nominal value at
the time of issuance.
STOCK OPTIONS. The Company has three stock option plans, the Amended and
Restated 1986 Stock Option Plan (the "1986 Plan"), the 1989 Nonstatutory Stock
Option Plan (the "1989 Plan") and the 1995 Stock Option Plan (the "1995 Plan")
(collectively, the "Plans"). The Plans reserve 5,678,570 shares of the
Company's common stock for issuance and permit the issuance of nonqualified
stock options. The exercise price of all nonqualified stock options must be
equal to at least 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date
of grant in the 1986 and 1989 Plans and 95% in the 1995 Plan, and the maximum
term of each grant is ten years. Options granted become exercisable in full
or in installments pursuant to the terms of each agreement evidencing options
granted. The 1986 and the 1995 Plans also permit the issuance of incentive
stock options. As of December 31, 1996, the Company has not granted any
incentive stock options. The Company accounts for these plans under APB
Opinion No. 25, under which no compensation cost has been recognized.
During 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS 123,
"Accounting for Stock Based Compensation," which defines a fair value based
method of accounting for employee stock options or similar equity instruments
and encourages all entities to adopt that method of accounting for all of
their employee stock compensation plans. However, it also allows an entity to
continue to measure compensation cost for those plans using the method of
accounting prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees." Entities electing to continue under the guidance of APB Opinion
No. 25 must make pro forma disclosures of net income and earnings per share,
as if the fair value based method of accounting had been applied.
Had compensation costs for these plans been determined consistent with FASB
Statement No. 123, the Company's net loss and net loss per share would have
been reported as follows:
Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, 1996 December 31, 1995
----------------- -----------------
Net Loss (in thousands)
As reported $(5,737) $(2,482)
Pro forma (8,784) (4,348)
Net Loss Per Share
As reported $(0.16) $(0.11)
Pro forma (0.24) (0.20)
Because the SFAS No. 123 method of valuation has not been applied to options
granted prior to January 1, 1995, the resulting pro forma compensation costs
may not be representative of value to be expected in future years.
Additionally, 1995 amounts include a charge from amending the exercise price
of certain options granted prior to January 1, 1995.
For disclosure purposes, the fair value of stock based compensation was
computed using the Black-Scholes option pricing model as prescribed by SFAS
No. 123 with the following weighted average assumptions used for 1996 and 1995
grants:
Risk Free Interest Rate 6.30%
Expected Dividend Yield 0%
Expected Lives 3.5 years
Expected Volatility 50%
Activity in the Plans is as follows:
Number of Shares
-------------------------------------
(in thousands)
Weighted Average Directors
Exercise and
Price Per Share Officers Employees Others Total
---------------- -------- --------- -------- ---------
Outstanding at
December 31, 1993 $8.74 785 582 601 1,968
Granted $6.04 633 491 351 1,375
Cancelled $9.81 (736)(1) (606)(1) (501)(1) (1,743)
Exercised $1.75 -- (48) (100) (148)
Reclassified $6.00 (39) -- 39 --
--------------------------------------
Outstanding at
December 31, 1994 $5.61 643 419 390 1,452
Granted $4.15 1,083(2) 297(2) 35(2) 1,415(2)
Cancelled $5.45 (819)(2) (374)(2) (200)(2) (1,393)(2)
Exercised $4.60 -- (172) (142) (314)
Reclassified $4.36 (142) 124 18 --
--------------------------------------
Outstanding at
December 31, 1995 $4.29 765 294 101 1,160
Granted $6.76 612 2,109 50 2,771
Cancelled $6.37 (20) (58) -- (78)
Exercised $4.20 (55) (57) (35) (147)
Reclassified $6.12 88 (112) 24 --
--------------------------------------
Outstanding at
December 31, 1996 $6.10 1,390 2,176 140 3,706
======================================
Exercisable at
December 31, 1996 $4.45 563 139 105 807
======================================
- ------------
(1) In July 1994, the Company amended options under the Company's stock
option plans with exercise prices of between $9.80 and $14.00 per share to (i)
provide for a new exercise price equal to $6.00 per share and (ii) reduce the
number of shares subject to each option to an amount equal to 70% of the
number of shares subject to the option at the time of amendment. The number
of cancelled options resulting from the repricing totalled 487,574.
(2) The Company granted options to purchase an aggregate of 1,415,309 shares
in 1995 comprised of (i) options covering 995,309 shares which were originally
granted at various times between April 1989 and April 1995 and were amended in
July 1995 pursuant to the 1995 Debt Conversion Agreement solely to reduce the
exercise price thereof to $4.15 per share and (ii) additional grants of
options covering 420,000 shares.
The weighted average fair value of shares granted during the years ended
December 31, 1995 and 1996 are $2.08 and $3.78, respectively.
The following table sets forth the exercise price range, number of shares,
weighted average exercise price and remaining contractual lives by groups of
similar price and grant date:
Weighted Average
-------------------------
Exercise Price Number of Exercise Contractual
Range Shares Price Life
-------------- --------- -------- -----------
$1.75 29,461 $1.75 1.99
$4.15 841,618 $4.15 6.32
$5.69 - $6.89 2,765,736 $6.71 9.34
$8.02 - $8.19 69,500 $8.14 9.51
The Company has also granted options not subject to the Plans to others.
Activity involving such options is as follows:
Exercise
Price Per Share Number of Shares
--------------- ----------------
(in thousands)
Outstanding at December 31, 1994 and 1995 $1.75 38
Exercised $1.75 (35)
-----
Outstanding and exercisable
at December 31, 1996 $1.75 3
=====
9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:
Mr. Oren L. Benton ("Mr. Benton") and the Fund are principal stockholders of
the Company.
TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING OREN L. BENTON. In September 1995, pursuant to a Debt
Conversion Agreement dated July 31, 1995 (the "1995 Debt Conversion
Agreement"), between the Company, Mr. Benton, the Fund and BEA Associates,
Inc. ("BEA"), BEA purchased all of Mr. Benton's and an unaffiliated third
party assignee's rights in a $12,000,000 Note held by Mr. Benton and the
unaffiliated third party assignee. BEA then converted all outstanding
principal and interest under such note in the aggregate amount of $16,947,583
as of July 31, 1995 into an aggregate of 5,500,000 shares of common stock. In
connection with such conversion, the Company also issued to BEA in September
1995 five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,100,000 shares of common
stock at an exercise price of $4.15 per share, which warrants BEA then
transferred to Mr. Benton. BEA also granted to Mr. Benton an 18-month option
to purchase the 5,500,000 shares of common stock acquired by BEA at exercise
prices ranging from $5.00 to $7.50 per share depending on the date of
exercise. The 18-month option granted to Mr. Benton was not exercised and
expired on March 14, 1997.
In September 1995, pursuant to the 1995 Debt Conversion Agreement, Mr. Benton
converted all outstanding principal and interest under a 1993 secured note
held by him and all remaining outstanding interest under a previously
converted note in the total amount of $3,670,919 as of July 31, 1995 into
1,191,470 shares of common stock and exchanged the warrants then held by
Mr. Benton to purchase an aggregate of 1,861,216 shares of the Company's
common stock for new five-year warrants to purchase the same number of shares
at an exercise price of $4.15 per share. A 1994 unsecured note held by
Mr. Benton in the aggregate amount (principal and interest as of July 31,
1995) of $2,742,908 was also converted into 890,265 shares of common stock
pursuant to the 1995 Debt Conversion Agreement.
The Company also granted to Mr. Benton under the 1995 Debt Conversion
Agreement certain rights to register under the Securities Act for resale all
of the warrants and shares of common stock issued to Mr. Benton pursuant to
the 1995 Debt Conversion Agreement. In the 1995 Debt Conversion Agreement,
the Company, the Fund and BEA also agreed that for as long as Mr. Benton
beneficially owns 5% or more of the issued and outstanding shares of the
Company's common stock, they will use their best efforts to cause one designee
of Mr. Benton to serve on the Company's Board of Directors.
TRANSACTIONS WITH THE FUND. Pursuant to a Stock and Warrant Purchase
Agreement dated March 13, 1989 between the Company and the Fund, as amended by
Amendment No. 1 thereto dated June 29, 1989 (the "1989 Fund Purchase
Agreement"), the Company agreed to pay to the Fund, for as long as the Fund
owns at least 5% of the outstanding shares of the Company's common stock, a
reasonable monthly consulting fee of not more than $5,000 and to reimburse the
Fund for all out-of-pocket expenses incurred in monitoring the Fund's
investment in the Company. During 1996, 1995 and 1994, the Company was
obligated to pay to the Fund approximately $60,000, $89,300, and $81,400,
respectively, in payment of such fees and expenses.
In March 1995, the Fund agreed to lend up to $3,000,000 to the Company
pursuant to a convertible promissory note (the "March 1995 Facility") bearing
interest at 12%, of which all principal and interest were to be due in March
1997. The loan was secured by a third priority interest in the Company's
building and equipment and a second priority interest in all other assets of
the Company. As part of the loan transaction, the Company exchanged all
warrants then held by the Fund to purchase an aggregate of 4,028,485 shares of
common stock for new five-year warrants to purchase the same number of shares
at an exercise price of $4.15 per share. Under the March 1995 Facility, the
Fund could at any time convert all or any portion of the principal and
interest outstanding thereunder into shares of common stock at a conversion
price equal to $3.475 per share, which conversion price was determined
pursuant to the loan agreement and was equal to the average of the closing
prices of the Company's common stock on The Nasdaq Stock Market for the five
days following the initial advance under the March 1995 Facility.
In September 1995, pursuant to the 1995 Debt Conversion Agreement, the Fund
converted the aggregate amount of $3,669,552, representing as of July 31, 1995
all outstanding principal and interest under a 1993 secured note held by the
Fund and the remaining interest from a previously converted note into
1,191,026 shares of common stock and exchanged the warrants issued by the
Company to the Fund in March 1995 for new five-year warrants to purchase the
same number of shares at an exercise price of $4.15 per share. As of
December 31, 1996, all of the warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,028,485
shares of the Company's common stock remained outstanding.
The Company also granted to the Fund under the 1995 Debt Conversion Agreement
certain rights to register under the Securities Act for resale all of the
warrants and shares of common stock issued to the Fund pursuant to the 1995
Debt Conversion Agreement. In the 1995 Debt Conversion Agreement, the
Company, Mr. Benton and BEA agreed that for as long as the Fund owns 5% or
more of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company's common stock, they
will use their best efforts to cause one designee of the Fund to serve on the
Company's Board of Directors. The Company also agreed in the 1989 Fund
Purchase Agreement to use its best efforts to cause a designee of the Fund to
serve on the Company's Board of Directors for as long as the Fund owns 5% or
more of the Company's outstanding Common Stock.
In September 1995 and in connection with the 1995 Debt Conversion Agreement,
the Company and the Fund entered into a Loan Agreement (the "New Fund Credit
Facility") pursuant to which the Fund agreed to lend to the Company up to
$12,000,000 bearing interest at 12% and to treat the amount advanced to the
Company under the March 1995 Facility as an advance against the New Fund
Credit Facility. The outstanding principal balance and accrued interest as of
December 31, 1996 under the New Fund Credit Facility were $2,600,000 and
$571,000, respectively. The outstanding principal balance and accrued
interest as of December 31, 1995 under the New Fund Credit Facility were
$2,600,000 and $254,000, respectively. The New Fund Credit Facility is
secured by a first priority security lien on the Company's assets, including
the assets of its subsidiary, EMS, and by a pledge of the shares of stock of
EMS and Racom owned by the Company. The Fund has the right to convert all or
any portion of the amounts outstanding under the New Fund Credit Facility into
common stock at any time or times before maturity of the loan in June 1998 at
a conversion price equal to $10.5125 for each share of common stock. The
conversion price was determined pursuant to the loan agreement and is equal to
the average of the closing prices of the Company's common stock on The Nasdaq
Stock Market for the five days following the initial advance under the New
Fund Credit Facility. The Company also agreed under the New Fund Credit
Facility to register for resale any shares of common stock issued by the
Company upon any conversion of amounts outstanding under the New Fund Credit
Facility.
TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING GEORGE J. STATHAKIS. In July 1995, Mr. Stathakis
entered into a consulting agreement with the Company pursuant to which he
agreed to perform consulting services for the Company until December 31, 1996
in consideration of $7,000 per month. Pursuant to the terms of such
consulting agreement, the Company has options to extend the term of the
agreement for six additional periods of six months each. In December 1996,
the Company exercised a six month extension to such agreement to perform
consulting services for the Company through June 30, 1997.
During 1996, the Company paid to Mr. Stathakis $77,000 as payment for
consulting fees and reimbursement for expenses owed to Mr. Stathakis in
connection with consulting services performed by Mr. Stathakis for the benefit
of the Company during 1996.
The consolidated statements of operations include amounts attributable to
related party transactions, as follows:
1996 1995 1994
------ ------ ------
(in thousands)
Sales, general and administrative expenses:
- ------------------------------------------
Consulting and director fees $147 $187 $ 170
Travel costs -- 44 389
Legal, accounting and consulting fees -- 17 202
Advertising and investor relations fees -- 45 505
------ ------ ------
$147 $293 $1,266
====== ====== ======
1996 1995 1994
------ ------ ------
(in thousands)
Interest expense:
- ----------------
Interest expense on long-term promissory
notes, related parties $ -- $1,126 $1,570
Interest expense on notes payable, related parties -- 579 620
Interest expense on convertible promissory
notes, related parties 317 275 37
------ ------ ------
$317 $1,980 $2,227
====== ====== ======
10. MAJOR CUSTOMERS AND EXPORT SALES:
Transactions with the following customers accounted for more than 10% of the
Company's various revenues:
1996 1995 1994
------------ ------------ ------------
(dollars in thousands)
Product sales:
A $1,862 11% $ -- -- $ -- --
B 2,615 15% -- -- -- --
C -- -- 1,888 17% 6,518 46%
D -- -- -- -- 2,254 16%
E -- -- 1,136 10% -- --
License and development fees revenue:
F $ -- -- $2,500 23% $2,500 83%
G 1,500 11% -- -- 500 17%
H 2,000 15% 2,000 18% -- --
I 3,750 28% 5,000 45% -- --
J 5,000 38% -- -- -- --
Customer-sponsored research and
development revenues:
F -- -- $ 57 20% $ -- --
K 26 13% 109 39% 152 26%
L, an affiliate 35 18% 90 32% 322 56%
M -- -- -- -- 66 12%
N 27 14% -- -- -- --
O 20 10% -- -- -- --
P 23 12% -- -- -- --
Q 25 13% -- -- -- --
R 32 16% -- -- -- --
Royalties - S -- -- $6,500 100% $2,653 100%
Export product sales as a percentage of total product sales were 21%, 49% and
57% for the years 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
11. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
CASH PAID FOR INTEREST AND INCOME TAXES:
1996 1995 1994
------ ------ ------
(in thousands)
Interest $41 $44 $270
Income taxes -- -- --
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
1996 1995 1994
------ ------ ------
(in thousands)
Conversion of related-party promissory notes and
accrued interest to common stock $-- $27,030 $--
Conversion of Series B preferred stock -- -- 67
Conversion of Series C preferred stock -- 95 --
License purchased with a note payable -- 1,650 --
12. INCOME TAXES:
As of December 31, 1996, the Company had approximately $120 million of net
operating loss carryovers for tax purposes. Further, the Company has
approximately $.9 million of research and development tax credits available to
offset future federal tax. The net operating loss and credit carryovers
expire through 2011. The Internal Revenue Code contains provisions which may
limit the net operating loss carryforwards available to be used in any given
year if certain events occur, including significant changes in ownership
interests.
The components of the net deferred income tax asset were as follows:
December 31,
--------------------
1996 1995
------- -------
(in thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
License fees and deferred revenue $2,700 $ 1,700
Long-term accrued interest payable,
related parties -- 1,600
Other 1,400 1,700
Net operating loss carryovers 47,800 42,000
Tax credit carryovers -- 2,300
------ -------
51,900 49,300
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation differences -- (100)
------ -------
Net deferred tax asset 51,900 49,200
Valuation allowance (51,900) (49,200)
------ ------
$ -- $ --
====== ======
Income taxes computed using the federal statutory income tax rate differ from
the Company's effective tax rate primarily due to net operating loss
carryforwards.
Taxes other than payroll and income taxes were $807,000, $1,296,000 and
$803,000 for 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
13. DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN:
The Company has a cash or deferred compensation plan (the "401(k) Plan")
intended to qualify under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the "Code"), in which substantially all full-time employees are
participants. Participants in the 401(k) Plan may make maximum pretax
contributions, subject to limitations imposed by the Code, of 25% of their
compensation. The Company may make, at the Board of Directors' discretion, an
annual contribution on behalf of each participant. No amounts have been
contributed by the Company under the 401(k) Plan on behalf of participating
employees.
14. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS:
Interference proceedings are continuing, challenging one of the Company's
issued patents which pertains to an invention that the Company believes is of
fundamental importance to its business. In 1992, a three-way "interference"
contest was declared in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the
"Patent Office") covering a patent which is owned by the Company. This patent
covers a basic ferroelectric memory cell design that is of fundamental
importance to the Company's business interests in the United States. An
interference is declared in the Patent Office when two or more parties each
claim to have made the same invention. The interference is therefore
conducted to determine which party is entitled to the patent rights
corresponding to the invention. In the present interference contest, the
Company is the "senior" party and is in possession of the issued US patent.
The other two parties involved in the interference are "junior" parties, and
each has the burden of proof of convincing the Patent Office by a
preponderance of the evidence that it was the first to invent the subject
matter of the invention and thus is entitled to the corresponding patent
rights. The Company and only one of the two claimant parties in the
interference proceedings filed briefs in this matter. Oral arguments were
presented before the Patent Office on March 1, 1996. A decision by the Patent
Office was originally expected within six (6) months after the oral hearing,
but due to the complexity of the case, a decision is now expected within
eighteen (18) months after the oral hearing. Such decision would complete the
administrative process. The non-prevailing party would then have the right,
upon the filing of appropriate petitions, to pursue its case in Federal Court.
The Company has vigorously defended its patent rights in this interference
contest and will continue such efforts. The Company is uncertain as to the
ultimate outcome of the above matter, as well as the associated effect upon
the Company's financial position and results of operations.
From time to time the Company is party to various legal claims and disputes
incident to its normal operating activities. Management believes none of these
actions would have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial
position or results of operations.
RAMTRON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(in thousands)
Column A Column B Column C Column D Column E
- -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Additions
----------------------
Balance at Charged to Charged to Balance at
Beginning Costs and Other End
Description of Period Expenses Accounts Deductions of Period
- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Year Ended 12/31/94:
Allowance for
doubtful accounts $ 50 $531 $-- $271 $310
=========================================================
Year Ended 12/31/95:
Allowance for doubtful
accounts, returns and
discounts $310 $463 $-- $489 $284
=========================================================
Year Ended 12/31/96:
Allowance for doubtful
accounts, returns and
discounts $284 $499 $-- $547 $236
=========================================================
Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
There have been no changes in or disagreements with accountants required to be
reported herein.
PART III
Item 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information concerning the Company's directors required by this Item is
incorporated by reference to the information contained in the section
captioned "Election of Directors" in the Company's Proxy Statement.
The information concerning the Company's executive officers required by this
Item is included in Part I hereof entitled "Executive Officers of the
Registrant."
The information concerning compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is incorporated by reference to the
information contained in the Section captioned "Common Stock Ownership
Principal Stockholders and Management - Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance," in the Company's Proxy Statement.
Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the
information contained in the section captioned "Executive Compensation" in the
Company's Proxy Statement.
Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the
information contained in the section captioned "Common Stock Ownership
Principal Stockholders and Management" in the Company's Proxy Statement.
Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the
information contained in the sections captioned "Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions" and "Executive Compensation and Other Information-
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" in the Company's
Proxy Statement.
PART IV
Item 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this report:
(1) Financial Statements. The following Consolidated Financial
Statements of the Company and the Report of Independent Accountants are
incorporated by reference from the indicated pages of the Company's 1996
Annual Report to Stockholders:
Report of Independent Public Accountants
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1996 and 1995
Consolidated Statements of Operation for the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow for the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule II: Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
All other schedules are omitted because they are not required, or not
applicable, or because the required information is included in the financial
statements or notes thereto.
3. Exhibits
Exhibit
Number
-------
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, as amended.
3.2 Bylaws of Registrant, as amended.
10.1 Registrant's Amended and Restated 1986 Stock Option Plan and
forms of Incentive Stock Option Agreement, Nonstatutory
Stock Option Agreement and Stock Purchase Agreement.(1)
10.2 Registrant's amended 1989 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan and
forms of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement and Stock
Purchase Agreement.(2)
10.3 Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement for option grants
outside the 1986 Plan, including schedule identifying
optionees.(3)
10.4 Common Stock Purchase Option of Registrant dated October 4,
1989 issued to Global Alliance Pty. Ltd.(4)
10.5 Form of Invention and Non-Disclosure Agreement
between Registrant and employees.(5)
10.6 Indemnification Agreement dated March 7, 1990 between Oren L.
Benton and George J. Stathakis.(10)
10.7 Technology License Agreement dated October 25, 1991 between
Registrant and Racom Systems, Inc.(6)
10.8 Supply Agreement dated October 25, 1991 between Registrant
and Racom Systems, Inc.(6)
10.9 Shareholders' Agreement dated October 25, 1991 among
Registrant, Racom Systems, Inc., AWA Limited and Intag
International Limited.(6)
10.10 Letter Agreement dated December 18, 1991 between Oren L.
Benton and George J. Stathakis.(6)
10.11 Hitachi-Ramtron Addendum to Letter of Intent dated August 24,
1992 between Registrant and Hitachi.(8)
10.12 Product Development Agreement between Racom Systems, Inc. and
Registrant dated September 17, 1992.(7)
10.13 Letter Agreement between Registrant and Lehman Brothers Inc.
dated July 21, 1993.(9)
10.14 Amendment to Technology License Agreement and Supply
Agreement between Registrant and Racom Systems, Inc. dated
March 31, 1994.(2)
*10.15 High-Density FRAM Cooperation Agreement between Registrant
and Hitachi, Ltd. dated April 25, 1994.(2)
*10.16 Memorandum of Understanding dated April 25, 1994 between the
Registrant and Hitachi.(11)
*10.17 Cooperative Agreement for License Manufacturing of FRAM
Product between Registration and Rohm Co., Ltd. dated
August 3, 1994.(2)
*10.18 Stock Purchase Agreement between Registrant, Intag
International Limited and Racom Systems, Inc. dated
November 14, 1994.(2)
10.19 First Amendment to Shareholders Agreement between Registrant,
Intag International Limited and Racom Systems, Inc. dated
November 14, 1994.(2)
*10.20 Second Amendment to Technology License Agreement and Supply
Agreement between Registrant, Intag International Limited and
Racom Systems, Inc. dated February 17, 1995.(2)
10.21 1995 Stock Option Plan and forms of Incentive Stock Option
Agreement and Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement.(10)
10.22 Employment Agreement effective April 1, 1995 between the
Registrant and L. David Sikes.(10)
*10.23 Agreement for EDRAM Design and Purchase of Products dated
April 26, 1995 between the Registrant and IBM.(11)
*10.24 Memorandum for Payment under High-Density FRAM Cooperation
Agreement dated May 11, 1995 between the Registrant and
Hitachi.(11)
*10.25 Memorandum of Understanding dated May 8, 1995 among the
Registrant, Intag and Racom.(11)
10.26 Ramtron Employment Security and Incentive Programs Memorandum
dated May 12, 1995 and Amendment No. 1 to Incentive
Program.(10)
*10.27 Termination Agreement dated May 17, 1995 among the
Registrant, Nippon Steel and UMI.(11)
*10.28 Transit Foundry Agreement dated May 23, 1995 between EMS and
Nippon Steel.(11)
*10.29 FRAM Technology License Agreement dated July 31, 1995 between
the Registrant and Toshiba.(11)
10.30 Agreement for (1) Sale of Certain Ramtron Debt to BEA, (2)
Conversion of Such Transferred Debt and Conversion of Benton
and NEBF Debt into Ramtron Equity Interest and (3) Provision
of $12.0 Million Credit Facility to Ramtron dated July 28,
1995 among the Registrant; the Fund; Oren L. Benton and the
bankruptcy estates of CSI Enterprises, Inc., Energy Fuels,
Ltd., Oren L. Benton, Energy Fuels Exploration Co. and Nuexco
Trading Corporation; BEA; and Nordostschweizerische
Kraftwerks AG (NOK), Kernkraftwerk Gosgen-Daniken AG and
Kernkraftwerk Leibstadt AG.(10)
*10.31 Symetrix/Ramtron Ferroelectric Cross License Agreement dated
as of August 11, 1995 between the Registrant and
Symetrix.(11)
10.32 Loan Agreement dated August 31, 1995 between the Registrant
and the Fund.(10)
10.33 Promissory Note dated August 31, 1995 in the maximum
principal amount of $12,000,000 made by the Registrant in
favor of the Fund.(10)
10.34 Warrant to Purchase 4,028,485 shares of Common Stock dated
August 31, 1995 issued by the Registrant to the Fund.(10)
10.35 Warrant to Purchase 1,861,216 shares of Common Stock dated
August 31, 1995 issued by the Registrant to the Oren Lee
Benton, Debtor in Possession.(10)
10.36 Agreement dated as of August 31, 1995 between Mr. Benton,
Debtor in Possession, and BEA.(10)
*10.37 First Amendment to Symetrix/Ramtron Ferroelectric Cross
License Agreement dated September 13, 1995 between the
Registrant and Symetrix.(11)
*10.38 Memorandum of Understanding dated September 21, 1995 between
the Registrant and Hitachi.(11)
*10.39 Amendment dated September 21, 1995 to High-Density FRAM
Cooperation Agreement between the Registrant and Hitachi.(11)
*10.40 Supplement-1 dated September 28, 1995 to Cooperative
Agreement for License Manufacturing of FRAM Product between
the Registrant and Rohm.(11)
10.41 Warrant to Purchase 1,100,000 shares of Common Stock dated
October 5, 1995 issued by the Registrant to the Oren Lee
Benton, Debtor in Possession.(10)
*10.42 FRAM Technology License Agreement dated December 19, 1995
between the Registrant and Fujitsu.(11)
*10.43 Memorandum of Understanding dated December 19, 1995 between
the Registrant and Fujitsu.(11)
*10.44 Amendment No. 2 to High-Density FRAM Cooperation Agreement
dated March 11, 1996 between the Registrant and Hitachi, Ltd.
*10.45 Amendment to Agreement dated August 30, 1996 between the
Registrant and Fujitsu.(12)
10.46 Amendment No. 1 to Registrant's 1995 Stock Option Plan dated
October 24, 1996.
10.47 Amendment No. 1 to Registrant's 1989 Nonstatutory Stock
Option Plan dated October 24, 1996.
10.48 Amendment No. 1 to Registrant's Amended and Restated 1986
Stock Option Plan dated October 24, 1996.
*10.49 Memorandum of Understanding dated November 22,1996 between
the Registrant and SGS-Thomson Microelectronics SA.
*10.50 FRAM License Agreement dated December 20, 1996 between the
Registrant and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
11.1 Statement regarding computation of per share earnings.
23.1 Consent of Independent Public Accountants
27.1 Financial Data Schedule
* Confidential treatment has been granted or requested with respect to
portions of this exhibit, and such confidential portions have been deleted and
separately filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule
24b-2 or Rule 406.
- -----------
(1) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
(Commission File No. 0-17739) for the year ended June 30, 1991, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 30, 1991.
(2) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
(Commission File No. 0-17739) for the year ended December 31, 1994 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 17, 1995.
(3) Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to Ramtron Holdings
Limited's Registration Statement on Form 20-F under cover of Form 8
(Commission File No. 0-17121) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on November 14, 1988.
(4) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
(Commission File No. 0-17739) for the year ended June 30, 1990, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on October 18, 1990.
(5) Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K under cover of Form 8 (Commission File No. 0-17739) for
the year ended June 30, 1991, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on November 6, 1991.
(6) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Commission File No. 33-44952 1-3) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on January 2, 1992.
(7) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
(Commission File No. 0-17739) for the year ended June 30, 1992 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 28, 1992.
(8) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
(Commission File No. 0-17739) for the year ended December 31, 1992 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 1993.
(9) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
(Commission File No. 0-17739) for the year ended December 31, 1993 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 1994.
(10) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form S-1 Registration
Statement (Commission File No. 33-99898) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 1, 1995.
(11) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Amendment No. 2 to the Form
S-1 Registration Statement (Commission File No. 33-99898) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on January 31, 1996.
(12) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Amendment No. 2 to the Form
10-Q (Commission File No. 0-17739) for the quarter ended September 30, 1996
and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 23, 1997.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
On January 24, 1996, the Registrant filed a report on Form 8-K. The item
reported was Item 5 - "Other Events."
(c) Exhibits - See the list of Exhibits under Item 14(a)3 of this Form 10-K.
(d) Financial Statement Schedules - See the list of Schedules under Item
14(a)2 of this Form 10-K.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the County of El
Paso, State of Colorado, on March 26, 1997.
RAMTRON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
By: /S/ L. David Sikes
-----------------------
L. David Sikes
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant
and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
Signature Title Date
- -------------------------- ---------------------------- --------------
/S/ L. David Sikes
- -------------------------- Chairman and Chief Executive 3-26-97
L. David Sikes Officer
/S/ George J. Stathakis
- -------------------------- Director 3-26-97
George J. Stathakis
/S/ William G. Howard
- ------------------------- Director 3-26-97
William G. Howard
/S/ William G. Tull
- ------------------------- Director 3-26-97
William G. Tull
/S/ L. T. Womack
- ------------------------- Director 3-26-97
L. T. Womack
/S/ Michael L. Rothschild
- ------------------------- Director 3-26-97
Michael L. Rothschild
/S/ Greg B. Jones
- ------------------------- Director, President and 3-26-97
Greg B. Jones Chief Operating Officer
/S/ Richard L. Mohr
- ------------------------- Executive Vice President and 3-26-97
Richard L. Mohr Chief Financial Officer