SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002
Commission file number 0-18335
TETRA Technologies, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE |
|
74-2148293 |
(State of incorporation) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
25025 I-45 North, The Woodlands, Texas 77380 |
||
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code) |
||
|
||
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (281) 367-1983 |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes: ý No o
As of September 30, 2002 there were 14,174,854 shares of the Companys common stock, $0.01 par value per share, issued and outstanding.
ITEM 1: Financial Statements
TETRA Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended September 30,
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
|||||||
2002
|
2001
|
2002
|
|
2001
|
||||
Revenues: |
||||||||
Product sales |
$30,521
|
|
$35,502
|
$88,541
|
$118,622
|
|||
Services |
28,180
|
|
41,874
|
90,677
|
112,929
|
|||
Total revenues |
58,701
|
|
77,376
|
179,218
|
231,551
|
|||
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|||||
Cost of product sales |
19,383
|
|
23,709
|
56,504
|
81,859
|
|||
Cost of services |
26,633
|
|
30,979
|
78,233
|
84,960
|
|||
Total cost of revenues |
46,016
|
|
54,688
|
134,737
|
166,819
|
|||
Gross profit |
12,685
|
|
22,688
|
44,481
|
64,732
|
|||
|
|
|
||||||
General and administrative expense |
10,803
|
|
10,885
|
30,068
|
32,745
|
|||
Operating income |
1,882
|
|
11,803
|
14,413
|
31,987
|
|||
|
|
|
||||||
Interest expense, net |
758
|
|
422
|
2,018
|
1,417
|
|||
Other income (expense) |
457
|
|
(322
|
) |
577
|
(464
|
) | |
|
|
|
||||||
Income before taxes |
1,581
|
|
11,059
|
12,972
|
30,106
|
|||
|
|
|
||||||
Provision for income taxes |
539
|
|
4,209
|
4,618
|
11,374
|
|||
|
|
|
||||||
Net income |
$1,042
|
|
$6,850
|
$8,354
|
$18,732
|
|||
|
|
|
||||||
Net income per share |
$0.07
|
|
$0.49
|
$0.59
|
$1.34
|
|||
Average shares |
14,175
|
|
14,082
|
14,181
|
14,023
|
|||
|
|
|
||||||
Net income per diluted share |
$0.07
|
|
$0.46
|
$0.56
|
$1.26
|
|||
Average diluted shares |
14,752
|
|
14,947
|
14,901
|
14,914
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1
TETRA Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In Thousands)
|
|
September
30, |
|
December
31, |
|
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
$5,243 |
|
|
$13,115 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
1,740 |
|
1,726 |
|
||
Trade accounts receivable net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,267 in 2002 and $1,768 in 2001 |
|
51,526 |
|
72,688 |
|
||
Inventories |
|
39,470 |
|
37,969 |
|
||
Deferred tax assets |
|
5,885 |
|
5,846 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
6,009 |
|
5,003 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
109,873 |
|
136,347 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property, plant and equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Land and building |
|
12,766 |
|
12,361 |
|
||
Machinery and equipment |
|
157,315 |
|
142,731 |
|
||
Automobiles and trucks |
|
11,366 |
|
10,659 |
|
||
Chemical plants |
|
36,119 |
|
36,120 |
|
||
O&G producing assets |
|
18,544 |
|
14,399 |
|
||
Construction in progress |
|
8,540 |
|
11,036 |
|
||
|
|
244,650 |
|
227,306 |
|
||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(92,766
|
) |
(80,333
|
) | |||
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
151,884 |
|
146,973 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cost in excess of net assets acquired, net of accumulated amortization of $3,523 in 2002 and $3,540 in 2001 |
|
24,352 |
|
19,613 |
|
||
Patents, trademarks & other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $4,804 in 2002 and $4,216 in 2001 |
|
6,720 |
|
2,223 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
3,411 |
|
3,015 |
|
||
Net assets of discontinued operations |
|
813 |
|
1,638 |
|
||
Total other assets |
|
35,296 |
|
26,489 |
|
||
|
|
|
$297,053 |
|
|
$309,809 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2
TETRA Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In Thousands)
|
|
September
30, |
|
December
31, |
|
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Trade accounts payable |
|
|
$24,222 |
|
|
$35,937 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
21,204 |
|
30,526 |
|
||
Current portions of all long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
261 |
|
428 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
45,687 |
|
66,891 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
40,000 |
|
41,000 |
|
||
Capital lease obligations, less current portion |
|
301 |
|
473 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
22,741 |
|
22,732 |
|
||
Decommissioning liabilities |
|
9,034 |
|
9,631 |
|
||
Other liabilities |
|
705 |
|
1,432 |
|
||
Total long-term and other liabilities |
|
72,781 |
|
75,268 |
|
||
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 40,000,000 shares authorized, with 14,174,854 shares issued and outstanding in 2002 and 13,912,722 shares issued and outstanding in 2001 |
|
146 |
|
142 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
88,390 |
|
84,912 |
|
||
Treasury stock, at cost, 422,675 shares in 2002 and 322,400 shares in 2001 |
|
(7,005 |
) |
(4,986 |
) |
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
(1,210 |
) |
(2,328 |
) |
||
Retained earnings |
|
98,264 |
|
89,910 |
|
||
Total stockholders equity |
|
178,585 |
|
167,650 |
|
||
|
|
|
$297,053 |
|
|
$309,809 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
TETRA Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In Thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
|
$8,354 |
|
|
$18,732 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
15,822 |
|
13,779 |
|
||
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
577
|
849
|
|||||
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
(534 |
) |
(167 |
) |
||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Trade accounts receivable |
|
19,888 |
|
(19,007 |
) |
||
Inventories |
|
(1,320 |
) |
(2,683 |
) |
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
(969 |
) |
(1,000 |
) |
||
Trade accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
(16,973 |
) |
24,379 |
|
||
Reduction of decommissioning liabilities |
(5,471
|
) |
(1,272
|
)
|
|||
Discontinued operations: non cash charges and working capital changes |
|
818 |
|
3,741 |
|
||
Other |
|
(168 |
) |
(235 |
)
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
19,994 |
|
37,116 |
|
||
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
(16,466 |
) |
(21,602 |
) |
||
Business combinations, net of cash acquired |
(11,100
|
) |
(4,930
|
) | |||
Additions to Maritech decommissioning liabilities |
|
1,312 |
|
113 |
|
||
Decrease (increase) in other assets |
|
(5,015 |
) |
(1,772 |
) |
||
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
3,081 |
|
1,393 |
|
||
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
(28,188 |
) |
(26,798 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
17,000 |
|
8,591 |
|
||
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
(18,353 |
) |
(26,324 |
) |
||
Repurchase of common stock |
(1,733
|
) |
|
||||
Proceeds from sale of common stock and exercised stock options |
|
3,198 |
|
3,626 |
|
||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
112 |
|
(14,107 |
) |
||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
210
|
9
|
|||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(7,872 |
) |
(3,780 |
) | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
13,115 |
|
6,594 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
|
$5,243 |
|
|
$2,814 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE A BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X for interim financial statements required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and do not include all information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. However, the information furnished reflects all normal recurring adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods.
The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2001.
For the purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid cash investments with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Interest paid on debt during the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 was $2,294,000 and $2,479,000, respectively.
Income tax payments made during the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 were $1,353,000 and $4,436,000, respectively.
The Company's Maritech Resources, Inc. subsidiary purchases natural gas and oil properties and assumes the related well abandonment and decommissioning liabilities. Many of the transactions have been structured so that the estimated fair market value of the natural gas and oil reserves received equals the amount of its working interest ownership of the well abandonment and decommissioning liabilities recorded, net of any cash received or paid. In addition, the Company enters into turnkey abandonment and decommissioning contracts under which abandonment and decommissioning liabilities are assumed. These agreements stipulate that the Company will be paid on a turnkey basis for future abandonment and decommissioning as the work is performed.
The decommissioning liability recorded on the Company's balance sheet is an estimate of the third party fair market value (including an estimated profit) to dismantle, remove and dispose of the Company's offshore production platforms, gathering systems, wells and related equipment. Whenever practical, Maritech will utilize the services of its affiliated companies to perform well abandonment and decommissioning work. When these services are performed by an affiliated company, all recorded intercompany revenues are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. The recorded decommissioning liability associated with a specific property is fully extinguished when the property is completely abandoned. The liability is first reduced by all cash expenses incurred to abandon and decommission the property. If the liability exceeds (or is less than) TETRA's out-of-pocket costs then the difference is reported as income (or loss) in the period in which the work is performed.
This decommissioning work resulted in reductions to the decommissioning liability of approximately $5.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and approximately $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. These reductions have been reflected in the consolidated statement of cash flow for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The 2001 consolidated statement of cash flow has been restated to conform to the current year's presentation.
5
New Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2002, FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated With Exit or Disposal Activities," which requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability occurs, and that the liability be measured initially at fair value. The liability is adjusted each reporting period for accretion, with a charge to the statement of operations. This statement replaces Emerging Issues Task Force Issue (EITF) No. 94-3,"Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (Including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." The Company will apply SFAS No. 146 to exit or disposal activities initiated on or after January 1, 2003.
NOTE B COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company, its subsidiaries and other related companies are named as defendants in numerous lawsuits and respondents in certain governmental proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of lawsuits or other proceedings against the Company cannot be predicted with certainty, management does not expect these matters to have a material adverse impact on the Company.
NOTE C ACQUISITIONS
On July 18, 2002, the Company acquired the assets of Precision Well Testing Company (Precision) for $10.0 million in cash. Precision provides production testing services to the U.S. Gulf Coast onshore and offshore Gulf of Mexico markets. The business has been integrated with TETRA's Testing & Services Division as part of its production testing operations, supplementing existing operations in Louisiana and South Texas. In addition, in September 2002, the Company acquired the assets of Bee Line Well Service, Inc., (Bee Line) for $1.1 million in cash. Bee Line provides onshore well abandonment services to the East Texas and Northern Louisiana markets. This business has been integrated into the Well Abandonment & Decommissioning Division of TETRA.
These acquisitions have been accounted for as asset purchases, with all operations included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from the dates of acquisition. The purchase price of each acquisition has been allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on a determination of their fair market values. Pro forma information for these acquisitions have not been presented as such amounts are not material.
NOTE D CHANGE TO SUCCESSFUL EFFORTS
Effective January 1, 2002, the Company changed its method of accounting for activities associated with its natural gas and oil properties to the successful efforts method. Previously, the Company used the full cost method of accounting in which all the costs associated with acquiring and developing oil and gas properties were capitalized. The Company decided to make this change because accounting under the successful efforts method more accurately depicts the operating profits of the well abandonment and decommissioning and the oil and gas exploitation businesses. Under the full cost method of accounting, certain circumstances would require the earnings of the well abandonment and decommissioning business to be reported as part of the Company's oil and gas exploitation business. Additionally, the Company believes the successful efforts method of accounting is more widely accepted, is preferred by many in the financial community and represents the SEC's preferred accounting method for such activities. Had the successful efforts method of accounting been adopted as of January 1, 2000, the reported consolidated net income and earnings per share for 2000 and 2001 would not have materially changed.
Under the successful efforts method, the costs of successful exploratory wells and leases containing productive reserves are capitalized. Costs incurred to drill and equip development wells, including unsuccessful development wells, are capitalized. Other costs such as Geological and Geophysical costs and the drilling costs of unsuccessful exploratory wells are expensed. The main difference between the two accounting methods is that, under the full cost method Geological and Geophysical costs and the drilling costs of unsuccessful exploratory wells are capitalized. The other major difference is the size of the geographic area over which costs
6
are accumulated or pooled. This area is the entire country under the full cost method, whereas it is confined to the field or geological trend under successful efforts. Properties are assessed for impairment in value whenever indicators of impairment become evident, with any impairment charged to expense as a non-cash cost. Companies using successful efforts are exposed to the risk that the value of a particular property would have to be written down or written off in a particular quarter whereas under full cost accounting the impaired cost might be offset by higher values in other properties thus eliminating the need for a write off in the period. The Company did not incur any Geological and Geophysical costs and did not participate in the drilling of any wells in the years 2000 and 2001, or in the nine months ended September 30, 2002. Under the successful efforts method, all capitalized costs are segregated and recorded by productive field and are depleted on a unit-of-production basis based on the estimated remaining equivalent proved oil and gas reserves for each field.
NOTE E DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
The Company developed a plan in October 2000 to exit its micronutrients business which produces zinc and manganese products for the agricultural markets. The plan provided for the sale of the stock of TETRA's wholly owned Mexican subsidiary, Industrias Sulfamex, S.A. de C.V., a producer and distributor of manganese sulfate, and all the manganese inventory held by the Company's U.S. operations. It also provided for the sale or other disposition of all inventories, plant and equipment associated with its U.S. zinc sulfate business. In December 2000, the Company sold all of its U.S. and foreign manganese sulfate assets for $15.4 million in cash. Effective September 30, 2001, the Company sold the remainder of its micronutrients business, except for the Cheyenne, Wyoming facility, which was closed and is being held for sale at September 30, 2002. The Company has accounted for the micronutrients business as a discontinued operation and has restated prior period financial statements accordingly.
Summary operating results of discontinued operations are as follows:
Three
Months Ended September 30,
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||
2002
|
|
2001
|
|
2002
|
|
2001
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||
Revenues |
$17
|
$5,164
|
$467
|
$16,249
|
|||
Income (loss) before taxes |
|
|
|
|
|||
Provision for taxes |
|
|
|
|
|||
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations |
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
The net assets to be disposed of are carried at their expected net realizable values and have been separately classified in the accompanying balance sheet at September 30, 2002.
The following is a reconciliation of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding with the number of shares used in the computations of net income per common and common equivalent share:
Three
Months Ended September 30,
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||
2002
|
|
2001
|
|
2002
|
|
2001
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||
Number of weighted average common shares outstanding |
14,174,854
|
14,081,696
|
14,181,060
|
14,023,295
|
|||
Assumed exercise of stock options |
576,759
|
865,291
|
719,862
|
890,557
|
|||
Average diluted shares outstanding |
14,751,613
|
14,946,987
|
14,900,922
|
14,913,852
|
In applying the treasury stock method to determine the dilutive effect of the stock options outstanding during the third quarter of 2002, the average market price of $20.56 was used.
7
NOTE G COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 is as follows:
Three
Months Ended September 30,
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
|||||||
2002
|
2001
|
|
2002
|
|
2001
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
|
|||||||
Net income |
$1,042
|
$6,850
|
$8,354
|
$18,732
|
||||
Increase (decrease) in the fair value of interest rate swap agreements, net of taxes |
265
|
(1,133
|
) |
968
|
(1,133
|
)
|
||
Increase (decrease) in the fair value of oil swap agreements, net of taxes |
26
|
|
(152
|
) |
|
|||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(27
|
) |
(229
|
) |
302
|
303
|
||
Comprehensive income |
$1,306
|
$5,488
|
$9,472
|
$17,902
|
NOTE H INDUSTRY SEGMENTS
The Company manages its operations through three divisions: Fluids, Well Abandonment & Decommissioning and Testing & Services. The Company's Fluids Division manufactures and markets clear brine fluids to the oil and gas industry for use in well drilling, completion and workover operations in both domestic and international markets. The division also markets the liquid and dry calcium chloride manufactured at its production facilities to a variety of markets outside the energy industry.
The Well Abandonment & Decommissioning Division provides a complete package of services required for the abandonment of depleted oil and gas wells and the decommissioning of platforms, pipelines and other associated equipment. The division services the U.S. Gulf Coast onshore and inland waters markets and the offshore markets of the Gulf of Mexico. The Division is also an oil and gas producer from wells acquired in connection with its well abandonment and decommissioning business.
The Company's Testing & Services Division provides production testing services to the U.S. Gulf Coast, offshore Gulf of Mexico and certain Latin American markets. It also supplies the technology and services necessary for the separation of impurities from hydrocarbon streams and the processing of oily residuals for exploration, production and refining operations.
The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes and non-recurring charges, return on investment and other criteria. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. Transfers between segments, as well as geographic areas, are priced at the estimated fair value of the products or services as negotiated between operating units. "Other" includes corporate expenses, non-recurring charges and elimination of intersegment revenues.
8
Summarized financial information concerning the business segments from continuing operations is as follows:
Fluids
|
Well
Abandon.
& Decomm. |
Testing
& Services |
|
Other
|
Consolidated
|
||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2002 |
|||||||||||
Revenues from external customers |
|||||||||||
Products |
$22,898
|
$4,275
|
$3,348
|
$
|
$30,521
|
||||||
Services and rentals |
3,291
|
14,214
|
10,675
|
|
28,180
|
||||||
Intersegmented revenues |
390
|
(15
|
)
|
21
|
(396
|
)
|
|
||||
Total revenues |
$26,579
|
$18,474
|
$14,044
|
($396
|
)
|
$58,701
|
|||||
Income before taxes |
3,792
|
566
|
1,029
|
(3,806
|
)
|
1,581
|
|||||
Total assets |
$118,318
|
$95,344
|
$70,935
|
$12,456
|
$297,053
|
||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2001 |
|||||||||||
Revenues from external customers |
|||||||||||
Products |
$29,087
|
$3,581
|
$2,834
|
$
|
$35,502
|
||||||
Services and rentals |
4,182
|
22,974
|
14,718
|
|
41,874
|
||||||
Intersegmented revenues |
566
|
157
|
4
|
(727
|
) |
|
|||||
Total revenues |
$33,835
|
$26,712
|
$17,556
|
($727
|
) |
$77,376
|
|||||
Income before taxes (a) |
5,241
|
4,405
|
5,368
|
(3,955
|
) |
11,059
|
|||||
Total assets |
$133,278
|
$86,038
|
$67,799
|
$17,834
|
$304,949
|
||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 |
|||||||||||
Revenues from external customers |
|||||||||||
Products |
$69,134
|
$11,177
|
$8,230
|
$
|
$88,541
|
||||||
Services and rentals |
9,412
|
45,828
|
35,437
|
|
90,677
|
||||||
Intersegmented revenues |
1,001
|
308
|
44
|
(1,353
|
)
|
|
|||||
Total revenues |
$79,547
|
$57,313
|
$43,711
|
($1,353
|
)
|
$179,218
|
|||||
Income before taxes |
12,159
|
4,188
|
7,487
|
(10,862
|
)
|
12,972
|
|||||
Total assets |
$118,318
|
$95,344
|
$70,935
|
$12,456
|
$297,053
|
||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2001 |
|||||||||||
Revenues from external customers |
|||||||||||
Products |
$98,590
|
$13,210
|
$6,822
|
$
|
$118,622
|
||||||
Services and rentals |
11,412
|
59,345
|
42,172
|
|
112,929
|
||||||
Intersegmented revenues |
1,322
|
410
|
65
|
(1,797
|
)
|
|
|||||
Total revenues |
$111,324
|
$72,965
|
$49,059
|
($1,797
|
)
|
$231,551
|
|||||
Income before taxes (a) |
17,173
|
11,841
|
13,674
|
(12,582
|
)
|
30,106
|
|||||
Total assets |
$133,278
|
$86,038
|
$67,799
|
$17,834
|
$304,949
|
9
(a) Pro forma income before taxes for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2001 excluding goodwill amortization was as follows:
Fluids
|
Well
Abandon.
& Decomm. |
Testing
& Services
|
|
Other
|
Consolidated
|
||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2001 |
|||||||||||
As reported |
$5,241
|
$4,405
|
$5,368
|
($3,955
|
)
|
$11,059
|
|||||
Goodwill amortization |
37
|
51
|
62
|
|
150
|
||||||
Pro forma |
$5,278
|
$4,456
|
$5,430
|
($3,955
|
)
|
$11,209
|
|||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2001 |
|||||||||||
As reported |
$17,173
|
$11,841
|
$13,674
|
($12,582
|
)
|
$30,106
|
|||||
Goodwill amortization |
91
|
153
|
187
|
|
431
|
||||||
Pro forma |
$17,264
|
$11,994
|
$13,861
|
($12,582
|
)
|
$30,537
|
NOTE I GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, Goodwill and Intangible Assets. The statement requires the Company to discontinue the amortization of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. The statement also requires that the Company perform reviews annually, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise, for impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. The Company has performed these impairment reviews on all goodwill and intangible assets and, as a result, has determined no material impairment exists. Goodwill amounts as of September 30, 2002 by reportable segment are as follows: Fluids - $4.1 million; Well Abandonment & Decommissioning - $6.8 million; Testing & Services - $13.5 million.
Amortization expense of all definite-lived intangible assets was $235,000 for the three-month period ended September 30, 2002, and was $574,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The amortization expense is included in operating income. Estimated future annual amortization of existing definite-lived intangible assets is $247,000 for the remainder of 2002, $917,000 for 2003, $857,000 for 2004, $749,000 for 2005 and $615,000 for 2006. These definite-lived intangible assets are shown separately on the balance sheet as Patents, Trademarks & Other Intangible Assets for the current period. The prior period balance sheet has been restated to conform to the current period's presentation.
10
The following table is a reconciliation of previously reported profits and earnings per share for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2001 to the pro forma amounts, which are adjusted to exclude amortization of goodwill, net of taxes.
Profit Before Tax
|
Income
Taxes
|
Net
Income
|
Diluted
Earnings Per Share
|
||||||
(In
Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
|||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2001 |
|||||||||
As previously reported |
$11,059
|
$4,209
|
$6,850
|
$0.46
|
|||||
Goodwill amortization |
150
|
20
|
130
|
0.01
|
|||||
Pro forma |
$11,209
|
$4,229
|
$6,980
|
$0.47
|
|||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2001 |
|||||||||
As previously reported |
$30,106
|
$11,374
|
$18,732
|
$1.26
|
|||||
Goodwill amortization |
431
|
56
|
375
|
0.03
|
|||||
Pro forma |
$30,537
|
$11,430
|
$19,107
|
$1.29
|
NOTE J DERIVATIVES
The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities as amended by SFAS No. 137 and SFAS No. 138. These statements require the Company to recognize all derivative instruments on the balance sheet at fair value and establish criteria for designation and effectiveness of hedging relationships. A fair value hedge requires that the effective portion of the change in the fair value of a derivative instrument be recorded in current period earnings. It also requires that the change in the fair value of the underlying assets, liability or firm commitment being hedged also be recorded in current earnings. The net earnings impact from a fair value hedge will, therefore, be zero unless the hedged transaction has an ineffective component, which will remain in current earnings. A cash flow hedge requires that the effective portion of the change in the fair value of a derivative instrument be recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI), a component of the Shareholders' Equity, and then be reclassified into earnings in the period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Any ineffective portion of a derivative instrument's change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings. All of TETRA's hedges are cash flow hedges.
The Company uses interest rate swap agreements to decrease the volatility of future cash flows associated with interest payments on its variable rate debt. The Company's swap agreements, in effect, provide a fixed interest rate of 6.4% on its credit facility through 2002. The nominal principal values of these agreements are substantially equal to the outstanding long-term debt balances. Differences between amounts paid and amounts received under the contracts are recognized in interest expense.
In March, 2002 the Company entered into a hedge to offset the variability of a portion of the cash flows generated from the sale of oil by Maritech Resources, Inc. by locking in a fixed price. The hedge agreement fixes a base price of $17.70 per barrel on approximately 92,000 barrels and runs through December 2002. Differences between the amount paid and amounts received under this contract are recognized as revenues.
11
The Company believes that its hedge agreements are "highly effective cash flow hedges," as defined by the Standards, in managing the volatility of future cash flows. The effective portion of the derivative's gain or loss (i.e., that portion of the derivative's gain or loss that offsets the corresponding change in the cash flows of the hedged transaction) is initially reported as a component of "accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" and will be subsequently reclassified into earnings when the hedged exposure affects earnings (i.e., when interest expense on the debt is accrued). The "ineffective" portion of the derivative's gain or loss is recognized in earnings immediately.
At September 30, 2002 the Company had $0.5 million of net losses on derivative instruments recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income on the balance sheet. In accordance with SFAS 133, the Company will transfer this amount to earnings during the next three months. These losses are due to the payment of fixed interest rates in excess of the variable rates paid under the Company's current credit facility and to an increase in market prices for crude oil relative to the fixed prices received under the oil hedge.
On October 4, 2002, the Company entered into an oil hedge to fix the price at $26.17 per barrel on approximately 182,500 barrels of production. The hedge is effective November 21, 2002 and terminates on November 20, 2003. The Company believes that this agreement is a highly effective cash flow hedge subject to hedge accounting.
ITEM 2: Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Results of Operations
Three months ended September 30, 2002 compared with three months ended September 30, 2001.
Total revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 were $58.7 million compared to $77.4 million in the prior year's quarter, a decrease of 24%. The Fluids Division's revenues were $26.6 million, a decrease of $7.3 million or 21% from the prior year's quarter. This decline reflected the lower activity levels in the U.S. as evidenced by the 31% drop in the average rig count from a year ago, a drop in well completions of 36% and significant downtime from weather related delays. The international fluids business was down significantly from last year primarily due to a drop in activity levels in the United Kingdom and Norway, as most international areas were also affected by the general market decline. The Well Abandonment & Decommissioning Division had revenues of $18.5 million, down $8.2 million or 31% from the prior year. This group experienced a significant decline in utilization due to the lower spending levels in the market, downtime related to repair of the heavy lift barge and storm-related work delays in the Gulf of Mexico and inland water areas of Louisiana. The Testing & Services Division revenues were $14.0 million, down $3.5 million or 20% from the prior year. This drop in revenue reflected a natural gas rig count that was down 29% from last year, and the offshore and onshore testing markets also suffered from the aforementioned storm delays in the Gulf. This group offset some of this decline in the third quarter with additional market share gains from the acquisition of additional offshore and land-based equipment.
Gross profit margin for the quarter was $12.7 million, down $10.0 million or 44% from the prior year's quarter of $22.7 million. Gross profit percentage fell to 21.6% from 29.3% last year. Lower overall pricing and lower utilization of the company's equipment, rig fleet and expanded infrastructure contributed to this drop.
General and administrative expenses were $10.8 million, down $0.1 million from the prior year's quarter of $10.9 million. Reductions in incentive compensation expenses and professional service fees were the primary reason for the overall drop which more than offset the higher insurance and expanded infrastructure costs versus last year. As a percent of revenue G&A was 18.4% in 2002 versus 14.1% in the prior year.
Net interest expense for the quarter was $0.8 million compared to $0.4 million in the prior year. Other income was $0.5 million for the quarter versus a net Other expense of $0.3 million in the prior year primarily from the gain on the sale of equipment in the 2002 quarter.
12
Net income was $1.0 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2002 compared to $6.9 million in the same quarter of 2001, a decrease of $5.9 million. Net income per diluted share was $0.07 in 2002 on 14,752,000 average diluted shares outstanding and $0.46 in 2001 on 14,947,000 average diluted shares outstanding.
Nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared with nine months ended September 30, 2001
Revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 were $179.2 million compared to $231.6 million in 2001, a decrease of $52.4 million or 23%. The Fluids Division revenues were $79.5 million, a decrease of $31.8 million or 29% from the prior year. The activity decline in the Gulf of Mexico average rig count of 30% and lower well completion activity contributed to this decrease as did the significantly lower international activity, primarily in the North Sea. Wholesale pricing improved over the prior year in the calcium chloride business of this division which helped to offset the general activity decline. The Well Abandonment & Decommissioning Division had revenues of $57.3 million versus $73.0 million in the prior year, a decrease of $15.7 million or 22%. Utilization rates for the well abandonment and wireline groups of this division were significantly lower than last year reflecting the reduced activity levels caused in part by weather delays and reduced customer spending levels in this segment. The Testing & Services Division revenues were $43.7 million, a decrease of $5.3 million or 11% from the prior year. Contributing to this decrease was a decline of 29% from last year in the average gas rig count as well as significant weather-related slowdowns throughout the period. The Division expanded its production testing business with a larger equipment fleet and an increase in market share in the period which helped to offset some of the activity decline.
Gross profit margin for the period was $44.5 million compared to $64.7 million in 2001, a decrease of $20.2 million or 31%. Gross profit percentage fell to 24.8% from 28.0% last year. Although overall gross profits were lower in the Fluids Division, margin percentages were higher than the prior year due to better wholesale pricing and a more favorable mix of service revenues. The Well Abandonment & Decommissioning and Testing & Services Divisions had lower gross profit and margin percentages due to the activity decline, weather delays and overall reduced equipment utilization.
General and administrative expenses for the period were $30.1 million versus $32.7 million in 2001. Reductions in incentive compensation expenses, professional fees and the general decline in business activity levels contributed to this decrease.
Net interest expense for the period was $2.0 million compared to $1.4 million in 2001. Lower interest income and the absence of an allocation of interest charges to discontinued operations contributed to the increase in net interest expense.
Net income was $8.4 million in the period ended September 30, 2002 compared to $18.7 million in 2001, a decrease of $10.3 million. Net income per diluted share was $0.56 in 2002 on 14,901,000 average diluted shares outstanding and $1.26 in 2001 on 14,914,000 average diluted shares outstanding.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company's investment in working capital, excluding cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, was $57.2 million at September 30, 2002 compared to $54.6 million at December 31, 2001, an increase of $2.6 million. Accounts receivable decreased $21.2 million due primarily to the lower activity levels in all three operating groups. Inventories were up $1.5 million primarily in the calcium chloride and international operating units of the Fluids Division as a result of slower oil and gas drilling. Accounts payable and accrued expenses were down $21.0 million as a result of the reduced activity levels across all business groups.
13
To fund its capital and working capital requirements, the Company uses cash flow as well as its general purpose, secured, prime rate/LIBOR-based revolving line of credit with a bank syndicate led by Bank of America. Effective September 30, 2002, the Company amended its credit facility expanding its available line of credit to $95 million. This agreement matures in December 2004, carries no amortization, and is secured by accounts receivable and inventories. The agreement permits the Company to execute up to $20 million of capital leases and $50 million of unsecured senior notes, and there are no limitations or restrictions on operating leases or unsecured non-recourse financing. TETRA's credit facility is subject to common financial ratio covenants. These include, among others, a funded debt-to-EBITDA ratio, a fixed charge coverage ratio, a tangible net worth minimum, an asset coverage ratio, and dollar limits on the total amount of capital expenditures and acquisitions the Company may undertake in any given year. The Company pays a commitment fee on unused portions of the line and a LIBOR-based interest rate which decreases or increases as the Company's funded debt-to-EBITDA ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) improves or deteriorates. The Company is not required to maintain compensating balances. The covenants also include certain restrictions on the Company for the sale of assets. As of September 30, 2002, the Company has $3.3 million in letters of credit and $40.0 million in long-term debt outstanding against a $95 million line of credit, leaving a net availability of $51.7 million. The Company believes this new credit facility will meet its foreseeable capital and working capital requirements through December 2004.
The Company uses interest rate swap agreements to decrease the volatility of future cash flows associated with interest payments on its variable rate debt. The Company also uses hedge agreements for a portion of its oil production to decrease the volatility associated with variable market pricing. At September 30, 2002, the Company had $0.5 million of net losses on derivative instruments recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income on the balance sheet. In accordance with SFAS 133, the Company will transfer this amount to earnings during the next three months. These losses are due to the payment of fixed interest rates in excess of the variable rates paid under the Company's current credit facility and an increase in market prices for crude oil relative to the fixed prices received under the oil hedge.
Capital expenditures during the nine months ended September 30, 2002 totaled approximately $16.5 million. Significant cash purchases included the addition of well abandonment and decommissioning equipment and the successful development and workover costs of certain Maritech Resources' oil and gas properties. Other cash expenditures included Process Services and Production Testing equipment.
Other investing activities included the increase in Patents, Trademarks and Other Intangible Assets of $4.8 million primarily due to the Company entering into a long-term supply agreement on May 15, 2002, for liquid calcium chloride. This supply agreement effectively replaces the previous liquid calcium chloride supply contract, which was to terminate by the end of 2002, with a new contract with the same supplier. Total consideration paid was $4.2 million which is being amortized over the term of the agreement.
In addition to capital expenditures and other investing activities, in July, 2002, the Company acquired the assets of Precision Well Testing Company (Precision) for $10.0 million in cash. Precision provides production testing services to U.S. markets. In September 2002, the Company acquired the assets of Bee Line Well Services, Inc. (Bee Line) for $1.1 million in cash. Bee Line provides onshore well abandonment services to East Texas and Northern Louisiana markets. Both acquisitions were accounted for as asset purchases.
The Company believes its principle sources of liquidity, cash flow from operations, revolving credit facility and traditional financing arrangements are adequate to meet its current and anticipated capital and operating requirements through at least December 2004.
14
Cautionary Statement for Purposes of Forward Looking Statements
Certain statements contained herein and elsewhere may be deemed to be forward-looking within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are subject to the "safe harbor" provisions of that act, including without limitation, statements concerning future sales, earnings, costs, expenses, acquisitions or corporate combinations, asset recoveries, working capital, capital expenditures, financial condition, and other results of operations. Such statements involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements. Some of the risk factors that could affect the Company's actual results and cause actual results to differ materially from any such results that might be projected, forecast, estimated or budgeted by the Company in such forward-looking statements are set forth in the section titled "Certain Business Risks" contained in the Company's report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
ITEM 4: Controls and Procedures
Compliance Certificates
On July 30, 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was signed into law, requiring that the CEO and CFO of public companies certify all periodic filings that contain financial statements. Pursuant to the Act, the Company has included as Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 such certifications by the CEO and CFO.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-14c and 15d-14c of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There were no significant changes in our internal controls subsequent to the evaluation.
15
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1: Legal Proceedings
The Company, its subsidiaries and other related companies are named as defendants in numerous lawsuits and respondents in certain governmental proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of lawsuits or other proceedings against the Company cannot be predicted with certainty, management does not expect these matters to have a material adverse impact on the Company.
ITEM 6: Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
99.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
A statement of computation of per share earnings is included in Note F to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report and is incorporated by reference into Part II of this report.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K: none
16
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TETRA Technologies, Inc. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 12, 2002 |
|
By: |
[Geoffrey M. Hertel] |
|
|
|
|
Geoffrey M. Hertel |
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 12, 2002 |
. |
By: |
[Joseph M. Abell] |
|
|
|
|
Joseph M. Abell |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 12, 2002 |
|
By: |
[Ben C. Chambers] |
|
|
|
|
Ben C. Chambers |
|
|
|
|
Vice President Accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 12, 2002 |
|
By: |
[Bruce A. Cobb] |
|
|
|
|
Bruce A. Cobb |
|
|
|
|
Vice President Finance |
|
17
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Geoffrey M. Hertel, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TETRA Technologies, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: November 12, 2002
/s/ Geoffrey M. Hertel
Geoffrey M. Hertel
President & Chief Executive Officer
18
I, Joseph M. Abell, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TETRA Technologies, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: November 12, 2002
/s/ Joseph M. Abell
Joseph M. Abell
Sr. Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
19