Back to GetFilings.com



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)

  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended      September 30, 2004       

OR

 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  

For the transition period from               to              

Commission file number   0-17480

CROWN RESOURCES CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Washington
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

84-1097086
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.

 

4251 Kipling St. Suite 390, Wheat Ridge, CO
(Address of principal executive offices)

80033
(Zip Code)

 

(303) 534-1030
Registrant's telephone number, including area code

 

          Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES

[X]

 

NO

[  ]

Indicated by checkmark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

YES

[  ]

 

NO

[X]

          Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

YES

[X]

 

NO

[  ]

          There were 40,014,132 shares of $0.01 par value common stock outstanding as of November 18, 2004.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART 1 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Page

Item 1    Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

3

Item 2    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial

 

               Condition and Results of Operations

19

Item 3    Quantitative and Qualitative Discussions about Market Risk

28

Item 4    Controls and Procedures

29

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1    Legal Proceedings

30

Item 2    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

30

Item 3    Defaults Upon Senior Securities

30

Item 4    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

30

Item 5    Other Information

30

Item 6    Exhibits

30

SIGNATURES

31

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

CROWN RESOURCES CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and

September 30,

December 31,

per share amounts)

2004

2003

                                                                     Assets

   

Current assets:

   

  Cash and cash equivalents

$ 2,315 

$   2,365 

  Restricted short-term investments

22 

22 

  Marketable equity securities available for sale, at fair value

280 

190 

  Receivable from Solitario Resources Corporation

178 

25 

  Prepaid expenses and other

      47 

      23 

     Total current assets

2,842 

2,625 

Mineral properties, net

35,164 

29,660 

Other assets:

 

 

  Equity method investment in Solitario Resources Corporation

-   

2,004 

  Investment in Solitario Resources Corporation, at fair value

1,184 

-   

  Other

     148 

     157 

     Total other assets

  1,332 

  2,161 

                                                 Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

   

Current liabilities:

   

  Accounts payable

$    822 

$      378 

  Accrued liabilities

121 

40 

  Current portion of long-term debt

50 

49 

  Accrued interest payable

          

       76 

      Total current liabilities

   993 

     543 

Long-term liabilities:

   

  Convertible senior notes payable, net of discounts

-   

226 

  Convertible senior notes payable, related party, net of discounts

-   

91 

  Long-term note payable

43 

36 

  Asset retirement obligation

22 

        21 

  Unexercised warrant liability, at fair value

12,659 

-   

  Deferred income taxes

  4,883 

   3,285 

      Total long-term liabilities

 17,607 

   3,659 

Commitments and contingencies

   

Stockholders' equity:

   

  Preferred stock, $0.01 par value: authorized 40,000,000 shares,
     none outstanding

-   

-   

  Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 100,000,000 shares,
     issued and outstanding, 40,014,132 and 22,321,306 at September 30,
     2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively

400 

223 

  Additional paid-in capital

52,628 

57,177 

  Treasury stock at cost, none and 373,191 shares at September 30,
     2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively

-   

(306)

  Unearned compensation

-   

(2,149)

  Accumulated deficit

(32,362)

(24,717)

  Accumulated other comprehensive income

      72 

       16 

      Total stockholders' equity

20,738 

 30,244 

 

$39,338 

$34,446 

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

CROWN RESOURCES CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per

Three months ended

Nine months ended

  share amounts)

          September 30,      

         September 30,     

 

   2004   

   2003   

   2004  

   2003   

   

(as restated, see Note 9)

 

(as restated, see Note 9)

Costs, expenses and other:

       

  Exploration expense

$     20 

$     28 

$     30 

$     28 

  Depreciation and amortization

11 

  General and administrative

175 

165 

647 

453 

  Variable stock option compensation

1,119 

848 

518 

1,453 

  Interest income

(8)

(6)

(15)

(19)

  Loss on derivative instrument, unexercised Crown warrants

3,253 

-   

3,253 

-   

  Gain on investment in Solitario Resources Corporation

(1,030)

-   

(1,030)

-   

  Equity in loss of Solitario Resources Corporation

52 

139 

475 

354 

  Other

       -   

     54 

      -   

       -   

Loss before income taxes

(3,583)

(1,231)

(3,886)

(2,280)

Income tax (expense) benefit

(1,985)

    418 

 (1,881)

    774 

Net loss

$(5,568)

$  (813)

$(5,767)

$(1,506)

Basic and diluted loss per common share:

$ (0.15)

$ (0.15)

$  (0.21)

$  (0.31)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding

37,366

 5,533 

27,139 

 4,918 

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

CROWN RESOURCES CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

Nine months ended September 30,

 

      2004

       2003

Operating activities:

 

(as restated, see Note 9)

Net loss

$(5,767)

$(1,506)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash
  used in operating activities:

  Depreciation and amortization

11 

  Equity in loss of Solitario Resources Corporation

475 

354 

  Variable stock option compensation

518 

1,453 

  Loss on derivative instrument

3,253 

-   

  Gain on investment in Solitario Resources Corporation

(1,030)

-   

  Deferred income tax (benefit)

1,881 

(774)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

   

  Prepaid expenses and other current assets

(177)

44 

  Accounts payable and other current liabilities

  526 

 (163)

        Net cash used in operating activities

 (313)

 (581)

Investing activities:

   

  Additions to mineral properties

(1,803)

(684)

  Increase in other assets

      -   

   (12)

        Net cash used in investing activities

(1,803)

 (696)

Financing activities:

   

  Payment on long-term debt

-   

(18)

  Proceeds from exercise of stock options

1,355 

-   

  Proceeds from exercise of warrants

711 

-   

  Common stock issued for cash

-   

13 

  Payment of restricted cash

-  

(33)

  Proceeds from issuance of Subordinated B notes

     -   

2,705 

        Net cash provided by financing activities

2,066 

2,667 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

(50)

1,390 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

2,365 

1,033 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

$2,315 

$2,423 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

   

  Cash paid for capitalized interest

$   181 

$      -   

  Non-cash transactions:

   

    Non-cash interest capitalized

$3,700 

$1,812 

    Common stock issued on conversion of Senior Notes

$3,600 

$      -   

    Common stock issued on cashless exercise of warrants

$     26 

$      -   

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

CROWN RESOURCES CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.     Business and Significant Accounting Policies

General

          The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of Crown Resources Corporation ("CRC") and its subsidiaries (collectively "Crown") as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 are unaudited, but in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, necessary for a fair presentation. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be achieved in the future.

          These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto which are included in Crown's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. The accounting policies set forth in those annual financial statements are the same as the accounting policies utilized in the preparation of these financial statements, except as modified for appropriate interim financial statement presentation.

Business

          Crown Resources Corporation and its subsidiaries ("Crown") engage principally in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral interests, which presently exist in the western United States. As discussed in Note 5 below, prior to Crown's distribution of Solitario Resources Corporation ("Solitario") on July 26, 2004, Crown owned 37.1% of Solitario, which had been accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Solitario operates as a precious and base metals exploration company in the United States, Brazil, Bolivia, and Peru.

          On November 20, 2003 Crown executed a definitive agreement to merge with Kinross Gold Corporation ("Kinross"), a Canadian corporation, as more fully described in Note 2 (the "Merger"). The Merger is subject to the approval of Crown's shareholders and customary closing conditions. Crown currently has no source of recurring revenue and Crown anticipates any future recurring revenue would only occur after the successful development of its Buckhorn Mountain Project. The successful development of the Buckhorn Mountain Project is dependent on several factors, many of which are beyond the control of Crown. Crown cannot provide any assurance that the Merger with Kinross will be completed as planned, or that it will be able to successfully permit and develop the Buckhorn Mountain Project in the event the Merger is not completed.

          Crown has historically derived its revenues principally from interest income and the option and sale of property interests. Crown currently has limited financial resources and, accordingly is not engaged directly in any significant exploration or development activity other than at its Buckhorn Mountain Project. Crown's current objective is to complete the permitting process for development of the Buckhorn Mountain Project in conjunction with Kinross. Unless Crown is successful in these objectives, it is unlikely that Crown will be in a position in the foreseeable future to pursue additional exploration or development projects. Furthermore, in the event the Merger with Kinross is not consummated, Crown will need significant additional financial resources to develop the Buckhorn Mountain Project and Crown cannot provide assurance that it will be able to obtain such financial resources. Crown currently estimates the initial capi tal cost for the Buckhorn Mountain Project will require up to $32.6 million. Based upon Crown's current business plan, Crown estimates its current financial resources are sufficient to fund its operations through 2005.

Recent Developments

          On July 14, 2004, holders of Crown's $3,600,000 10% Convertible Senior Notes converted all of the outstanding notes into 10,744,249 shares of Crown common stock (which include 261,535 shares for accrued interest through the date of conversion). As of September 30, 2004, Crown has no Senior Notes outstanding.

          Between July 7 and July 12, 2004, holders of Crown options representing 3,287,500 shares exercised their options by paying a total of $1,318,000 to Crown. As of September 30, 2004, Crown had no outstanding stock options.

          On July 14, 2004, holders of Crown's warrants exercisable into 947,140 shares exercised the warrants on a cash basis into 947,140 shares of Crown common stock by paying a total of $711,000 to Crown. On July 12, 2004 Solitario exercised warrants for 3,771,428 shares of common stock on a cashless basis and received 2,398,319 shares of Crown common stock. On August 11, 2004 holders of Crown warrants exercisable into 419,049 shares exercised the warrants on a cashless basis and received 208,118 shares of Crown common stock. As of September 30, 2004, Crown has warrants outstanding which are exercisable for up to 8,243,335 shares with an exercise price of $0.75 per share and which expire in October 2006. See discussion of the unexercised warrant liability in Note 6 below.

          On July 26, 2004, Crown completed a spin-off of Solitario's shares to its shareholders, whereby each Crown shareholder received 0.2169 shares of Solitario common stock for each Crown share they owned. As part of the spin-off, on July 26, 2004, Crown retained 998,306 shares of Solitario common stock (the "Retained Shares") for the benefit of Crown's warrant holders who will receive those shares when the warrant holders exercise their warrants. During the three months ended September 30, 2004, Crown distributed 48,293 Retained Shares upon the exercise of warrants and at September 30, 2004, had 950,013 Retained Shares. Crown carries its investment in the Retained Shares at fair value with changes in the fair value recorded in the statement of operations. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, Crown recorded a gain on its investment in Retained Shares of $1,030,000. Crown has recorded a liability for its entire investment balance, which is included in its unexercised warrant liability, see Note 6 below. In addition, Crown retained 93 Solitario shares, from fractional shares, which it intends to sell. After the disposition of the Solitario shares retained for warrant holders and fractional shares, Crown will no longer own any shares of Solitario.

          As a result of the above conversions of Crown Senior Notes, and the exercises of Crown options and Crown warrants the number of outstanding shares during the third quarter has increased as follows:

Common shares outstanding at June 30, 2004
  Shares issued on conversion of Senior Notes
  Shares issued on exercise of options
  Shares issued on exercise of warrants
Common shares outstanding at September 30, 2004

22,428,806
10,744,249
3,287,500
 3,553,577
40,014,132

Accounting for Stock Based Compensation

          Crown accounts for certain awards under the Crown Resources Corporation 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2002 Plan") as variable in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees", ("APB 25"). Under the terms of the 2002 Plan, the exercise price of options issued to employees and directors equals the market price of the stock on the date of grant. Crown previously had a 1988 Stock Benefit Plan (the "1988 Plan") and a 1991 Stock Incentive Plan (the "1991 Plan"). As a result of repricing options under Crown's 1988 Plan and the 1991 Plan in 1998 and 1999, Crown began to account for those option grants using variable plan accounting as of July 2000. In July 2002, Crown's Board of Directors granted 3,375,000 options under the 2002 Plan. Of these, 2,600,000 were deemed replacement options for cancelled option awards with var iable plan accounting. Accordingly, Crown accounts for increases and decreases in the intrinsic value of the 2,600,000 options as compensation expense in accordance Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") interpretation No. 44 "Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation (an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25)." Crown recorded compensation expense of $1,119,000 and $518,000, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 related to the increase in the intrinsic value of these option awards through the date of their exercise. Crown recorded compensation expense of $848,000 and $1,453,000, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 related to an increase in the intrinsic value of these option awards. As of December 31, 2003, Crown had recorded $2,149,000 of unearned compensation expense related to the unearned intrinsic value of these variable plan accounting options. During the third quarter of 2004, all of Crown's outstanding options were fully vested and were exercised, which resulted in $824,000 of previously recorded unearned compensation being recognized as part of the $1,119,000 compensation expense recorded during the quarter. At September 30, 2004 Crown has no stock options outstanding.

          Crown computes pro forma information as if Crown had accounted for its stock options under the fair value method of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 148 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure" and SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." Holders of options representing 3,287,500 and 3,379,000 shares, respectively, exercised their options during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004. Of these options exercised during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, options for 2,452,500 and 2,544,000 shares, were accounted for with variable plan accounting. Holders of options for 5,000 and 35,000 shares exercised their options during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, all of which were accounted for with variable plan accounting. The following pro forma information is provided for the fair values of options outstanding during these periods.

 

       For the three months       ended September 30,

       For the nine months       ended September 30,

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

        2004

        2003

        2004

        2003

Net loss as reported

$(5,568)

$ (813)

$(5,767)

$(1,506)

Add: Stock-based employee compensation included in

  reported net loss, net of related tax effects

739 

559 

342 

959 

Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation
   determined under fair value based method for all awards, net

   of related tax effects

  (134)

 (38)

   (198)

   (102)

Pro forma net loss

$(4,963)

(292)

$(5,623)

$  (649)

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:

       

   As reported

$  (0.15)

$(0.15)

$  (0.21)

$ (0.31)

   Pro forma

$  (0.13)

$(0.05)

$  (0.21)

$ (0.13)

Net Loss Per Common Share

          The net loss per common share is presented in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share ("EPS"). Basic EPS is calculated by dividing the income or loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Basic and diluted EPS were the same for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 because the Company had losses from operations and therefore, the effect of all potential common stocks was antidilutive.

          Stock options, warrants outstanding and their equivalents are included in diluted EPS computations through the "treasury stock method" unless they are antidilutive. Convertible securities are included in diluted EPS computations through the "if converted" method unless they are antidilutive. Potentially dilutive common shares are excluded from the computations in loss periods, as their effect would be antidilutive.  As of September 30, 2004 Crown had warrants which could be exercised for 8,243,335 common shares, that could potentially dilute earnings per share but were excluded from the computation of per share amounts for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. At September 30, 2003 Crown had stock options, warrants and convertible debt securities of approximately 44,740,000 shares that could potentially dilute earnings per share but were excluded from the comput ation of per share amounts for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, as their inclusion would have been antidilutive.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

          The Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") formed a committee to evaluate certain mining industry accounting issues, including issues arising from the application of SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations" ("SFAS No. 141") and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("SFAS No. 142") that included whether mineral interests conveyed by leases represent tangible or intangible assets and the amortization of such assets. In March 2004, the EITF reached a consensus in EITF Issue No. 04-2 "Whether Mineral Rights Are Tangible or Intangible Assets" ("EITF No. 04-2"), subject to ratification by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"), that mineral interests conveyed by leases should be considered tangible assets. On March 31, 2004, the FASB ratified the consensus of the EITF that mineral interest s conveyed by leases should be considered tangible assets subject to the finalization of a FASB Staff Position ("FSP") in this regard. On April 30, 2004, the FASB issued a FSP amending SFAS No. 141 and SFAS No. 142 to provide that certain mineral use rights are considered tangible assets and that mineral use rights should be accounted for based on their substance. The FSP is effective for the first reporting period beginning after April 29, 2004, with early adoption permitted. Crown adopted EITF No. 04-2 on April 1, 2004 and reclassified all of its mineral interests conveyed by leases from Mineral interests, net to Mineral Property, net in its balance sheets and will not amortize exploration stage mineral interests prior to the commencement of production.

          In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" ("FIN 46") and in December 2003 issued FIN 46R. FIN 46 requires the consolidation of variable interest entities which have one or both of the following attributes (1) the equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional financial support from other parties which is provided by other parties that will absorb some or all of the expected losses of the entity, (2) the equity investors lack controlling financial interest as evidenced by (i) the ability to make decisions regarding the entity's activities through voting or similar rights (ii) the obligation to absorb expected losses, which make it possible for the entity to finance its activities and (iii) the right to receive expected residual returns of the entity if they occur, which is the compensation for absorbing the expected losses. FIN 46 was immediately effective for variable interest entities formed after January 31, 2003. FIN 46R requires the adoption of either FIN 46 or FIN 46R in financial statements of public entities that have interests in structures that are commonly referred to as special purpose entities for periods ending after December 15, 2003. Application for all other types of variable interest entities is required in financial statements for periods ending after March 15, 2004. The adoption of FIN 46 and FIN 46R did not have an effect on Crown's financial position or results of operations.

          In April 2004, the EITF issued EITF Issue No. 04-3 "Mining Assets: Impairment and Business Combinations" ("EITF No. 04-3") which evaluated certain issues related to values in mining properties beyond proven and probable reserves ("VBPP") and the effects of anticipated fluctuations in the future market price of minerals. The EITF reached a consensus that fair value of mining properties generally includes both VBPP and the effects of anticipated fluctuations in the future market price of minerals and that entities should generally include both in determining the fair value allocated to mining assets in a purchase price allocation and in the cash flow analysis (both discounted and undiscounted) used for determining whether a mining asset is impaired. The consensus reached by the EITF is to be applied prospectively in the periods after March 31, 2004, but early application is permitted in periods for wh ich financial statements have not been issued. Crown adopted EITF No. 04-3 on April 1, 2004 and it did not have a have any impact on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

2.     Merger Agreement

          On November 20, 2003, Crown executed the Merger Agreement with Kinross whereby each of the outstanding shares of common stock of Crown will be exchanged for 0.2911 shares of Kinross common stock at closing (the "Merger"). The Merger is subject to the approval of two-thirds of Crown's shareholders and customary closing conditions. Until the Merger is completed, Crown is required to operate its business in the ordinary course, and is restricted from engaging in certain significant business and financing transactions, or changes in corporate structure.

          The Merger Agreement contemplates that all outstanding stock options to purchase Crown common stock will either be exercised or terminated prior to the effective time of the Merger. Between July 7 and July 12, 2004 all remaining options were exercised and as of September 30, 2004, Crown has no remaining stock options outstanding. Additionally, holders of unexercised warrants to purchase shares of Crown common stock will be allowed to elect to exchange the warrant for 0.2911 shares of Kinross common stock for each share of Crown common stock that would have been issued on the exercise of the warrant immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger on a cashless basis. Any warrants not exercised prior to the merger will represent the right to acquire Kinross common shares in accordance with the terms and conditions of the warrant as amended pursuant to the Merger Agreement.

          As a result of an extension of the previous termination date from September 30, 2004 until December 31, 2004, during the third quarter of 2004, the Merger Agreement may be terminated by either party if the transaction has not been consummated by December 31, 2004 subject to certain conditions, by mutual written consent, or upon the failure of Crown to obtain the approval of its shareholders. Both Crown and Kinross may also terminate the Merger Agreement upon the occurrence of a material breach of the agreement by the other party as defined in the Merger Agreement. Should Crown fail to complete the Merger as a result of receiving a superior proposal within six months of the date of the Merger Agreement, Crown will be obligated to pay Kinross a termination fee of $2.0 million plus Kinross' documented, reasonable third-party, out-of-pocket expenses in connection with the Merger Agreement.

3.     Corporate Reorganization

          On March 8, 2002, Crown filed a voluntary petition for protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the "Bankruptcy") in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado (the "Court"). As part of the Bankruptcy Crown filed a Plan of Reorganization (the "Plan") and a Disclosure Statement with the Court on March 25, 2002. On May 30, 2002, the Court confirmed the Plan, which became effective on June 11, 2002 (the "Effective Date"). As part of the Plan, Crown restructured its existing $15 million 5.75% Convertible Subordinated Debentures due August 2001 (the "Debentures").

          The restructuring was completed through an exchange of outstanding Debentures, including any accrued interest thereon for the following consideration: (i) issuance of $1,000,000 in cash, (ii) $2,000,000 in 10% Convertible Secured Notes (the "Secured Notes") convertible into Crown common shares at $0.35 per share, (iii) $4,000,000 of convertible unsecured subordinated notes (the "Subordinated Notes") convertible into common stock of Crown at $0.75 per share, and (iv) warrants, which expire in October 2006 that entitle the holders the right to purchase, in the aggregate, 5,714,285 shares of Crown common stock at an exercise price of $0.75 per share. The interest on the Secured and Subordinated Notes was payable in cash or shares of Crown common stock at the conversion price at Crown's election. In November 2003, all Subordinated Notes were automatically converted into shares of Crown common stock. In December 2003, substantiall y all Secured Notes were converted into shares of Crown common stock. See Note 4.

          In order to effect the Plan on the Effective Date, Crown entered into a Custody and Disbursing Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, Minnesota N.A. (the "Disbursing Agent") as well as trust indentures with Deutsche Bank Trust Company, Americas, as Trustee on the Secured Notes and with Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. as Trustee on the Subordinated Notes. As of November 5, 2004, $180,000 in Debenture certificates have not been presented. If all of these Debentures are presented, the disbursing agent will distribute $12,000 in cash, 68,571 shares of Crown common stock from the converted Secured Notes (plus accrued interest since June 11, 2002), 64,000 shares of Crown common stock from the converted Subordinated Notes (plus accrued interest since June 11, 2002), and warrants to acquire 68,571 shares of Crown common stock with an exercise price of $0.75 per share. The Debenture holders have until June 2007 to present their certificates, at which time any undistributed cash, stock and warrants will revert to Crown.

4.     Long-term Debt

Senior Notes

          In October 2001 Crown issued $3,600,000 of 10% convertible secured promissory notes due in October 2006 (the "Senior Notes"). The Senior Notes were secured by all of the assets of Crown on a pari-passu basis with the Secured Notes. The assets consist primarily of Crown's interest in the Buckhorn Mountain Project and its wholly owned subsidiary, Crown Resource Corp. of Colorado, whose assets consisted primarily of an equity interest in Solitario Resources Corporation ("Solitario").

          The Senior Notes had a five-year term and carry a 10% interest rate, payable quarterly in cash or Crown common stock at the conversion prices of $0.35 and $0.2916 per share at the election of Crown. Originally, proceeds of $3,250,000 from the Senior Notes were placed in escrow pending restructuring of the Debentures (the specific Senior Notes related to the proceeds placed in escrow are also referred to as "Escrowed Notes"). Solitario invested $650,000 in these Escrowed Notes. The Escrowed Notes are convertible into Crown common shares at a conversion price of $0.35 per share, subject to adjustment. In addition, the Escrowed Note holders have been issued a five-year warrant for every share into which the Escrowed Notes are convertible, which warrant will be exercisable into a Crown common share at $0.75 per share, subject to adjustment. Solitario also invested in a separate Senior Note, (referred to as the "Solitario Note") for the remaining $350,000 of the Senior Notes. These funds were made immediately available to Crown for general corporate purposes. The Solitario Note is convertible into Crown common shares at a conversion price of $0.2916 per share, subject to adjustment. In addition, Solitario has been issued a five-year warrant to acquire 1,200,000 shares of Crown common stock at $0.60 per share, subject to adjustment. The terms of the Solitario Note and the related warrant are otherwise identical to the terms of the Escrowed Notes and warrants. On July 14, 2004 holders of Crown's $3,600,000 10% Convertible Senior Notes converted all of the outstanding notes into 10,744,249 shares of Crown common stock (which include 258,535 shares for accrued interest through the date of conversion). As of September 30, 2004 Crown has no Senior Notes outstanding.

          On the date of issuance, the warrants described above had an estimated value of $379,000, which was recorded as a discount to the Senior Notes and credited to additional paid-in capital. This warrant discount was being amortized over the life of the Senior Notes and charged as capitalized interest costs, using the effective interest method. Upon conversion of the Senior Notes in July 2004, the remaining unamortized warrant discount of $179,000 was charged as capitalized interest cost.

          Under generally accepted accounting principles, any intrinsic value of the conversion feature (market price of the stock less the effective conversion price) of the Senior Notes, commonly known as a beneficial conversion feature, must also be recorded as a discount to the Senior Notes. On the date of issuance, there was no intrinsic value associated with the conversion feature of the Senior Notes and no discount was recorded thereon. However, when the Court approved the Plan of Crown on May 30, 2002, the terms of the Senior Notes were effectively changed, since the conversion price remained unchanged despite a 1 for 5 reverse split of Crown's common stock as required by the Plan. Based upon these revised terms, the intrinsic value of the conversion feature of the Senior Notes as of their issuance date was $3,221,000. Effective May 30, 2002, this amount has been recorded as a discount to the Senior Notes and credited to addition al paid-in capital. This conversion feature discount is being amortized over the remaining life of the Senior Notes and charged as capitalized interest cost. Upon conversion of the Senior Notes in July 2004, the remaining unamortized discount of $2,925,000 was charged as capitalized interest cost.

          A summary of the Senior Notes at December 31, 2003 is as follows:

 

2003

 


Related
Party
Notes


Other
Senior
Notes

Total
Senior
Notes
Payable

Face amount of Senior Notes

$1,000,000 

$2,600,000 

$ 3,600,000 

Unamortized warrant discount

(64,000)

(156,000)

(220,000)

Unamortized conversion feature discount

(845,000)

(2,218,000)

(3,063,000)

  Senior Notes balance

$    91,000 

$    226,000 

$    317,000 

Secured Notes

          As discussed above in Note 3, Crown issued $2,000,000 in 10% convertible Secured Notes as part of the corporate reorganization. The Secured Notes carried a 10% interest rate payable quarterly in cash or Crown common stock at the conversion price at the election of Crown. The Secured Notes were convertible into Crown common shares at $0.35 per share. The Secured Notes were secured by all of the assets of Crown on a pari-passu basis with the Senior Notes. Crown recorded a discount to the Secured Notes for the intrinsic value of the conversion feature on May 30, 2002 of $1,257,000 and credited additional paid-in capital for that amount. This conversion feature discount was being amortized over the remaining life of the Secured Notes as of May 30, 2002 and charged as capitalized interest cost.

          On November 21, 2003 the Secured Notes were called for redemption, and all but $6,000 of outstanding Secured Notes were converted into 5,679,142 shares of Crown common stock as of December 31, 2003, with the remainder being redeemed for cash. The remaining unamortized discount of $940,000 was charged to capitalized interest cost during 2003 upon conversion of the Secured Notes.

Subordinated Notes

          As discussed above in Note 3, Crown issued $4,000,000 in 10% convertible Subordinated Notes as part of the corporate reorganization. The Subordinated Notes carried a 10% interest rate payable quarterly in cash or Crown common stock at the conversion price at the election of Crown. The Subordinated Notes were convertible into Crown common shares at $0.75 per share.

          In October 2003 and November 2003 $839,331 of Subordinated Notes were converted into 1,119,108 shares of common stock prior to the automatic conversion on November 5, 2003. On November 5, 2003 the remaining $3,160,669 of Subordinated Notes were automatically converted into 4,214,225 shares of common stock. The automatic conversions were in accordance with the provisions of the Subordinated Notes whereby the Subordinated Notes automatically convert into common stock if the price of the common stock trades above 233% of the conversion price of $0.75, or $1.75, for twenty consecutive days. The shares related to the automatic conversion are deemed issued and outstanding as of the date of the automatic conversion.

Subordinated B Notes

           On February 21, 2003, Crown issued $2,705,000 of 10% Convertible Subordinated Promissory Notes due 2006, Series B (The "Subordinated B Notes"). The Subordinated B Notes were convertible into common stock of Crown at $0.75 per share. There was no beneficial conversion feature for the Subordinated B Note as the market price was below the conversion price at issuance. The Subordinated B Notes paid interest at 10% in stock or cash at Crown's option, and mature in October 2006. Solitario invested $400,000 in the Subordinated B Notes on the same terms as all other investors.

          On November 5, 2003, $2,705,000 of Subordinated B Notes were automatically converted into 3,606,667 shares of common stock. The automatic conversions were in accordance with the provisions of the Subordinated B Notes whereby the Subordinated B Notes automatically convert into common stock if the price of the common stock trades above 233% of the conversion price of $0.75, or $1.75, for twenty consecutive days. The shares related to the automatic conversion are deemed issued and outstanding as of the date of the automatic conversion.

Keystone Note

          In July 2001, as part of the termination of its joint venture on the Buckhorn Mountain Project with Newmont Mining Corporation, Crown assumed a note with a face value of $250,000 due February 22, 2002 (the "Keystone Note"). Crown recorded the Keystone Note at its discounted fair value of $237,000. On December 18, 2001 Crown amended the terms of the Keystone Note, by paying the holders of the Keystone Note $30,000 and extending the term of the Keystone Note for a period of four years, with a payment, including interest, of $20,000 due in June 2002 and four annual payments, including interest, of $50,000 beginning in December 2002. As a result of this amendment to the terms of the Keystone Note, Crown recorded a discount of $41,000 to its recorded value of the Keystone note for the present value of the remaining payments, and other income of the same amount. This discount is being amortized to capitalized interest cost over the remaining term of the note. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, Crown recorded capitalized interest cost of $2,000 and $7,000, respectively which represented amortization of its discount on the Keystone note. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, Crown recorded capitalized interest cost of $3,000 and $9,000, respectively which represented amortization of its discount on the Keystone note. At September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the current portion of the Keystone Note was $50,000 and $49,000 respectively.

Interest

          Interest costs are capitalized on mineral properties and mineral interest under development. Interest is capitalized by applying a weighted average interest rate to the average capitalized costs during a period, up to a maximum of total interest costs incurred during the period. Crown capitalized all of its interest costs of $3,531,000 and $3,881,000, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively. Crown capitalized all of its interest costs of $697,000 and $1,812,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively. At September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 a total of $17,766,000 and $13,885,000, respectively, of interest costs have been capitalized as mineral property at the Buckhorn Mountain Project.

          Prior to their conversion, Crown could pay interest on the Senior Notes, the Secured Notes, the Subordinated Notes and the Subordinated B Notes in cash or Crown common shares, at its election. Crown accrued interest at the nominal rate of 10% during the period the notes were outstanding. For interest paid in Crown common shares, capitalized interest cost was adjusted on the interest payment date to the market value of the common shares issued on that date.

          Crown recorded the following amounts to capitalized interest cost related to long-term debt:

 

Three months ended September 30,

 

 2004

2003

(in thousands)

         

Subor-

Subor-

   
 

Senior

Keystone

 

Senior

Secured

dinated

dinated

Keystone

 

Notes:

Notes

Note

Total

Notes

Notes

Notes

B Notes

Note

Total

  Stated interest

$     14

$   -  

$ 14

$ 91

$ 50

$100

$69

$ -  

$310

  Warrant discount amortization

3

-  

3

19

-  

-  

-  

-  

19

  Beneficial conversion feature
    discount amortization

 11

2

  13

34

55

-  

-  

3

  92

 Unamortized discount charged to
    interest upon conversion or
    exercise

3,104

-  

3,104

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

  Increase (decrease) in 
     interest cost from shares
     issued for interest

   397

   -  

  397

153

 83

 24

16

 -  

276

Total capitalized interest cost

$3,529

$    2

$3,531

$297

$188

$124

$85

$  3

$697

 

Nine months ended September 30,

 

 2004

2003

(in thousands)

         

Subor-

Subor-

   
 

Senior

Keystone

 

Senior

Secured

Dinated

dinated

Keystone

 

Notes:

Notes

Note

Total

Notes

Notes

Notes

B Notes

Note

Total

  Stated interest

$  194

$ -  

$  194

$269

$150

$299

$164

$  1

$  883

  Warrant discount amortization

41

-  

41

56

-  

-  

-  

-  

56

  Beneficial conversion feature
    discount amortization

138

7

145

81

155

-  

-  

9

245

 Unamortized discount charged to
    interest upon conversion or
    exercise

3,104

-  

3,104

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

  Increase (decrease) in 
     interest cost from shares
     issued for interest

  397

 -  

  397

373

200

 27

 28

 -  

  628

Total capitalized interest cost

$3,874

$   7

$3,881

$779

$505

$326

$192

$ 10

$1,812

      For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, interest income from Crown's interest bearing cash and short term investments of $8,000 and $15,000, respectively has been recorded in Crown's consolidated statements of operations. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, interest income of $6,000 and $19,000, respectively has been recorded in Crown's consolidated statements of operations.

Future minimum payments

          At September 30, 2004, future minimum payments on long term debt consist of two $50,000 payments on the Keystone note in due December 2004 and 2005.

5.          Equity Method Investment in Solitario Resources Corporation:

          Crown accounted for its investment in Solitario under the equity method of accounting.  On July 26, 2004 Crown distributed its holdings of 9,633,585 shares of Solitario's common stock to its stockholders. See Note 1 above. The fair value, based on the quoted market price, of Crown's 9,633,585 shares of Solitario common stock was approximately $11,271,000 at July 26, 2004 and $13,198,000 at December 31, 2003.

Condensed financial information of Solitario is as follows:

Balance Sheets

 

   (in thousands)

As of July 26, 2004

(the spin-off date)

As of December 31, 2003

Assets

   

Current assets

$  1,166

$  3,993

Mineral properties, net

2,707

2,760

Investment in Crown warrant, at fair value

-  

5,591

Note receivable from Crown

-  

937

Investment in Crown shares, at fair value

9,107

-  

Other

       87

        7

  Total assets

$13,067

$13,288

Liabilities and stockholders' equity

   

Current liabilities

$     310

$     763

Deferred income taxes

962

591

Stockholders' equity

11,795

11,934

  Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

$13,067

$13,288

Statements of Operations

Three months ended
September 30,

Nine months ended
September 30,

   (in thousands)

  2004 * 

  2003  

  2004 ** 

  2003  

         

Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments

$(612)

$(944)

$ 1,742 

$(2,320)

Other costs and expenses

141 

341 

1,263 

859 

Income tax (expense) benefit

(131)

    -   

   800 

      -   

Net (loss) income

$ 602 

$ 603 

$(2,205)

$ 1,461 

\Reconciliation of Solitario's stockholders' equity to Crown's investment in Solitario

(in thousands)

As of July 26, 2004

(the spin-off date)

As of December 31, 2003

Solitario stockholders' equity, as reported

$11,795 

$11,934 

Adjustments:

   

  Less Solitario's book value of Crown securities, recorded as treasury
      stock

1,883 

793 

  Less Solitario's accumulated other comprehensive income, related to
    gains on Crown common stock, net of $1,254 and $607 of tax at July     26, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively

2,230 

1,144 

  Less Solitario's unrealized gain on derivative instruments, related to
     gain on Crown warrants, net of $291 and $669 of tax at
     July 26, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively

 4,031 

 4,812 

Solitario adjusted stockholder's equity

3,651 

5,185 

Crown percentage ownership (2)

37.1%

 38.7%

Crown's investment in unconsolidated subsidiary

1,355 

$ 2,004 

Reconciliation of Solitario's net (loss) income to Crown's equity in loss of Solitario 

(in thousands)

Three months ended
September 30,

Nine months ended
September 30,

 

2004 *

2003

2004 **

2003

Solitario net (loss) income as reported

$ 602 

$   603 

$ (2,205)

$   1,461 

Adjustments:

       

  Solitario's derivative losses (gains) recorded in its statement
  of operations for its holdings of Crown warrants, net of $291
  and $669 in income taxes in the three and nine months ended
  September 30, 2004

(743)

(944)

942 

(2,320)

Solitario adjusted loss

(141)

(341)

(1,263)

  (859)

Crown weighted average percentage (2)

37.1%

40.8%

37.6%

41.2%

Crown's equity in loss of Solitario

$  (52)

$ (139)

$  (475)

$ (354)

* Operations during the period from July 1, 2004 to July 26, 2004, the date of the spin-off.

** Operations during the period from January 1, 2004 to July 26, 2004, the date of the spin-off.

(1) For purposes of calculating its investment in Solitario and its equity in Solitario's earnings and losses, Crown has excluded the amounts reported by Solitario with respect to its investment in Crown warrants and Crown common stock.

(2) The weighted average interest of Crown in Solitario's net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 reflects the dilution of Crown's ownership interest resulting from Solitario's issuance of 1,021,000 shares of its common stock upon the exercise of options. These transactions reduced Crown's investment in Solitario from 38.7% as of December 31, 2003 to 37.1% as of July 26, 2004, the spin-off date. Crown's proportionate interest in this issuance of Solitario shares, net of taxes, has been recorded as an increase in Crown's investment in Solitario, and an increase in additional paid-in capital.

Distribution of Solitario shares in the spin-off

          The distribution of Crown's equity-method investment in Solitario was accounted for at the recorded amount of the non-monetary assets distributed, pursuant to Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 29, "Accounting for Non-monetary Transactions" ("APB No. 29"). Accordingly, on July 26, 2004, Crown reduced its equity method investment in Solitario by the recorded value of $1,355,000, reduced its investment in treasury stock $699,000 for shares of Crown stock held by Solitario and increased other comprehensive income $26,000 for Crown's share of Solitario's loss on marketable equity securities. As a result of retaining the 998,306 Retained Shares, on July 26, 2004, Crown recorded an investment in Solitario of $214,000, which represents the proportional amount of Crown's historical cost investment as a result of the retaining the Retained Shares. Crown charged accumulated deficit $1,866,000 for the disposit ion of its equity-method investment in Solitario less the recorded investment in retained shares of Solitario. Crown also offset the increase to other comprehensive income by $9,000 for the related deferred tax benefit.

          Subsequent to the spin-off, upon the exercise of any remaining warrants, Crown will reduce its investment in the Retained Shares with a proportional reduction in its $214,000 historical cost investment based upon the number of Retained Shares distributed by a charge to accumulated deficit. Any accumulated gain and loss related to the fair value of the Retained Shares distributed will be charged against the unexercised warrant liability. See Note 6 below for a discussion of Crown's unexercised warrant liability related to the Retained Shares.

          Although the spin-off of Crown's interest in Solitario to its stockholders is expected to be a taxable transaction, it will not result in current tax due to the utilization of net operating losses. However, because the spin-off of Crown's holdings of Solitario is taxable at the fair market value of the shares distributed, rather than the recorded cost of its investment, Crown recorded an increase in its deferred tax liability of $1,066,000 with an offsetting charge to income tax expense for the estimated tax related to the anticipated tax gain. In addition, Crown recorded the reversal of $2,068,000 previously recorded deferred tax benefits related to the difference between Crown's book and tax basis in Solitario as a charge to income tax expense. The existing deferred tax liability is expected to be offset in the future by existing net operating losses.

6.     Unexercised warrant liability

          On July 1, 2004, as a result of declaring, as a dividend, the distribution of Crown's 9,633,585 shares of Solitario common stock, the classification of Crown's warrants changed from an equity derivative instrument to that of a liability derivative instrument in accordance with SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities". As a result, Crown recorded an unexercised warrant liability of $16,107,000 for the fair value of the securities to be delivered to the warrant holders upon the exercise of their warrants, with a corresponding charge to additional paid-in capital. All subsequent increases and decreases in the fair value of the warrant, including those related to the Retained Shares, are recorded in the statement of operations as gain or loss on derivative instruments. Upon exercise of the warrants, Crown reduces its investment in retained shares of Solitario for the fair value of any Retained Shares distributed, records the fair value of any shares of Crown common stock issued as stockholders' equity and reduces the unexercised warrant liability by the fair value of the Retained Shares distributed and the Crown common stock issued. During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, Crown recorded a loss on derivative instrument of $3,253,000, related to the increases in the fair value of the unexercised warrants. On July 12, 2004, Solitario exercised warrants for 3,771,428 on a cashless basis and received 2,398,319 shares of Crown common stock. On July 15, 2004, warrant holders exercised warrants for 947,140 shares for cash by paying $711,000 and received 947,140 shares of Crown common stock. Crown reduced its unexercised warrant liability by $6,284,000 and credited stockholders' equity by the same amount for the fair value of the Crown stock issued related to those warrant exercises. On August 16, 2004, a warrant holder exercised a warrant for 419,049 shares on a cashless basis and rece ived 208,118 shares of Crown common stock and 48,293 Retained Shares. Crown reduced its investment in retained shares of Solitario $49,000 with a $10,000 charge to accumulated deficit for the proportional share of the historical cost equity method investment and by $39,000 by a charge the unexercised warrant liability for the accumulated gain related to the fair value of the Retained Shares distributed on the date of exercise. Crown also reduced its unexercised warrant liability by $368,000 and credited stockholders' equity by the same amount for the fair value of the shares of Crown common stock issued. At September 30, 2004, the remaining fair value of the securities to be issued under the warrants was $12,659,000. All fair values for both the Retained Shares and the Crown shares of common stock issuable under the warrants have been determined using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

7.     Comprehensive Loss

The following represents comprehensive loss and its components:

 

Three months ended    
       September 30,            

Nine months ended    
       September 30,            

(in thousands)

          2004

     2003 

          2004 

     2003 

Net loss as reported

$(5,568)

$(813)

$(5,767)

$(1,506)

Net unrealized gain (loss) on marketable equity securities, net

   of tax expense (benefit) of $(9) and $14 in the
three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003,
respectively  and tax expense (benefit) of $20 and $(12) in
the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively

  (16)

28 

39 

(23)

Disposition of Crown's interest in Solitario's loss on
   marketable equity securities, net of tax
   (benefit) of $(9) in the three and nine months ended
   September 30, 2004

  17 

    -   

      17 

       -   

Comprehensive loss

$(5,567)

$(785)

$(5,711)

$(1,529)

8.     Related Party Transactions

          Crown provides management and technical services to Solitario under a management and technical services agreement originally signed in April 1994 and modified in April 1999, December 2000 and July 2002. Under the modified agreement Solitario is billed by Crown for services at 25% of Crown's corporate administrative costs for executive and technical salaries, benefits and expenses, 50% of Crown's corporate administrative costs for financial management and reporting salaries, benefits, expenses and 75% of Crown's corporate administrative costs for investor relations salaries, benefits and expenses. In addition, Solitario reimburses Crown for direct out-of-pocket expenses. These allocations are based upon the estimated time and expenses spent by Crown management and employees on both Crown's activities and Solitario's activities. Management believes these allocations are reasonable and the allocations are periodically rev iewed by management and approved by independent Board members of both Crown and Solitario. Management service fees are billed monthly, due on receipt and are generally paid within thirty days. Management service fees paid by Solitario were $96,000 and $293,000 for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively. Management service fees paid by Solitario were $89,000 and $275,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively. Solitario and Crown have continued to operate under the management and technical services agreement subsequent to the spin-off. If the Kinross merger is completed Crown and Solitario are expected to terminate the management and technical services agreement.

          On July 26, 2004, Crown completed a spin-off of Solitario's shares to its shareholders, whereby each Crown shareholder received 0.2169 shares of Solitario common stock for each Crown share they owned. As part of the spin-off, on July 26, 2004, Crown retained 998,306 Retained Shares for the benefit of Crown's warrant holders who will receive those shares when the warrant holders exercise their warrants. During the three months ended September 30, 2004, Crown distributed 48,293 Retained Shares upon the exercise of warrants and at September 30, 2004, had 950,013 Retained Shares. Crown carries its investment in the Retained Shares at fair value with changes in the fair value recorded in the statement of operations. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, Crown recorded a gain of $1,030,000 on its investment in retained shares of Solitario. Crown recorded a liability for its entire investment balance, which is i ncluded in its unexercised warrant liability. See Note 6 above. In addition Crown retained 92 shares, from fractional shares, which it intends to sell. After the disposition of the Retained Shares and fractional shares, Crown will no longer own any shares of Solitario.

          In October 2001, Solitario invested in two 10% convertible secured promissory notes ("Senior Notes") totaling $1,000,000 out of $3,600,000 Senior Notes issued by Crown. The first Senior Note (the "Solitario Note") of $350,000 has a conversion price of $0.2916 per share and the second Senior Note of $650,000 has a conversion price of $0.35 per share. The independent Board members of Crown and Solitario approved the investment in the Notes. Solitario was paid $50,000 in cash as interest income under the Senior Notes for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. Solitario was paid 89,522 and 249,718, respectively, Crown shares as interest income under the Senior Notes for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003. On July 14, 2004, Solitario converted its $1,000,000 face value of Crown Senior Notes into 3,132,509 shares of Crown common stock, which included 75,367 shares issued for accrued interest through the date of conversion on the Notes.

          As part of the investment in the Senior Notes, Solitario also received two warrants. The first warrant gives Solitario the right to purchase 1,857,143 shares of Crown for $0.75 through October 2006 and the second warrant gives Solitario the right to purchase 1,200,000 shares of Crown at $0.60 through October 2006. On July 12, 2004, Solitario exercised the two Crown warrants on a cashless exercise basis per the terms of the warrants. Solitario received a total of 1,973,626 shares of Crown common stock from the exercise of these warrants. See Note 6 above.

          Solitario entered into a Voting Agreement dated as of April 15, 2002 among Zoloto Investors, LP ("Zoloto") and Crown. Zoloto and Solitario are both shareholders of Crown (the "Signing Shareholders"). Pursuant to the Voting Agreement, Zoloto and Solitario agreed that each will vote its owned shares during the term of the Voting Agreement for the election of three designees of Zoloto and one designee of Solitario (the "Designee Directors") to the Board of Directors of Crown. The Signing Shareholders agreed that any shares received by either Signing Shareholder would be subject to the Voting Agreement during its term and any successor, assignee or transferee of shares from either Signing Shareholder would be subject to the terms of the Voting Agreement during its term. The Voting Agreement terminates on June 25, 2006. As of September 30, 2004, the Signing Shareholders collectively held 12,695,186 shares or 31.7% of the outstand ing Crown shares. In addition the Signing Shareholders hold warrants which could be exercised for an additional 5,714,285 Crown shares or a total of 18,409,472 or 38.1% of the then outstanding Crown shares.

          Solitario entered into a stockholder and voting agreement with Kinross, along with several Crown directors, Crown executive officers and entities affiliated with these directors and officers (collectively the "Signatories"), pursuant to which the Signatories agreed, among other things to cause to be voted, all of the shares of Crown common stock owned by them, as set forth in the stockholder and voting agreement, as well as all shares of Crown common stock acquired by them, as set forth in the stockholder and voting agreement, in favor of the approval of the plan of merger, and against the acquisition of Crown by any person other than Kinross. As of September 30, 2004, 14,891,278 shares of Crown common stock were subject to the stockholder and voting agreement, representing approximately 37.2% of the outstanding shares of Crown common stock entitled to vote at the Crown special meeting. Additionally, as of September 30, 2004, the Signatories hold warrants for 5,714,286 Crown shares, which could be exercised prior to the vote for a total of 20,605,564 Crown shares or approximately 42.7% of the then outstanding Crown shares.

          As of September 30, 2004, Solitario owns 6,071,626 shares of Crown common stock or approximately 15.2% of the outstanding shares of Crown.

9.     Restatement

          Subsequent to the issuance of Crown's unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, Crown determined it had not properly (i) capitalized interest costs related to the development of its Buckhorn Mountain Project; (ii) recorded Crown's equity interest in certain adjustments made by Solitario required by SFAS No. 142; and (iii) recorded a gain on the restructuring of its Keystone Note as a discount to be amortized over the remaining life of the Keystone Note when the note was renegotiated in December 2001, as discussed below.

(i)      Crown's Buckhorn Mountain Project has been in development since Crown acquired the project in 1989. Since August 1991 Crown has been incurring interest costs on long-term debt, which had not been capitalized as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 34, "Capitalization of Interest Cost" ("SFAS No. 34"). SFAS No. 34 requires capitalization of interest costs utilizing a weighted average rate on outstanding debt and applying that rate to the average outstanding balance of capitalized costs on projects in development, up to the total interest cost for the period.

(ii)      Subsequent to the issuance of Solitario's unaudited consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, Solitario determined that it had not properly adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142 in relation to the classification of assets as intangible mineral interests, and had not recorded the related amortization of those intangible assets and that Solitario had capitalized certain costs that should have been expensed as incurred.

(iii)      Subsequent to the issuance of Crown's unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, Crown determined that it should have accounted for the renegotiation of the Keystone Note as a debt extinguishment and recognized a gain it its 2001 statement of operations, to the extent of the difference between the present value of the Keystone Note payments before and after the renegotiation and amortize that discount to interest cost over the remaining term of the note.

          As a result, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 have been restated from the amounts previously reported. A summary of the significant effects of the restatement is as follows:

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS INFORMATION

 

Three months ended
September 30, 2003

Nine months ended
September 30, 2003

(in thousands except per share amounts)

As previously reported

As restated

As previously reported

As restated

Costs and expenses:

       

  Exploration expense

$     3 

$     28 

$       3 

$     28 

  Interest expense

694 

-   

1,803 

-   

  Equity in loss of Solitario Resources Corporation

91 

139 

193 

354 

Loss before income tax

(1,852)

(1,231)

(3,898)

(2,280)

Income tax benefit

629 

418 

1,324 

774 

Net loss

(1,223)

(813)

(2,574)

(1,506)

Basic and diluted loss per share

$ (0.22)

$ (0.15)

$ (0.52)

$ (0.31)

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

          The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of Crown for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, and Management's Discussion and Analysis contained in Crown's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. Crown's financial condition and results of operations are not necessarily indicative of what may be expected in future periods.

          As discussed in Note 9 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, our financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 have been restated. The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations gives effect to the restatement.

(a.) Business Overview

          We are a precious metals exploration company operating in the western United States. Our principal expertise is in identifying properties with promising mineral potential, acquiring these properties and exploring them to an advanced stage. Our goal is to advance our properties and mineral interests, either on our own or through joint ventures, to the feasibility study stage and thereafter to pursue their development, typically through a joint venture with a partner that has expertise in mining operations. We have in the past recognized, and expect in the future to recognize, revenues from the option and sale of our properties and mineral interests to joint venture partners and from the sale of our share of metals produced from our mineral interests.

          Our capitalized mineral property and mineral interests relate entirely to our Buckhorn Mountain Project, located in the State of Washington. We are currently developing the Buckhorn Mountain Project, which includes permitting efforts to build and operate an underground mine and to truck the ore extracted from the Buckhorn Mountain Project to the Kettle River mill, located approximately 52 miles from the Buckhorn Mountain Project. Kinross Gold Corporation, a Canadian corporation ("Kinross") owns the Kettle River mill. In December 2003, we entered into a toll-milling agreement with Kinross to facilitate the processing of the Buckhorn Mountain Project ore. As of September 30, 2004, our mineral reserves at the Buckhorn Mountain project, pursuant to a feasibility study prepared by an independent mining consulting firm, are 3,075,000 tons of ore at a grade of 0.32 ounces of gold per ton, for a total reserve of 991,000 ounc es of gold. The vast majority of our current and near-term efforts are related to this development effort at the Buckhorn Mountain Project as well as the completion of the Merger and Spin-off, discussed below.

          On November 20, 2003 we executed a definitive agreement to merge with Kinross (the "Merger"). The Merger is subject to the approval of two thirds of our shareholders and customary closing conditions.

(b.) Recent Financing Transactions

          On July 14, 2004 holders of our $3,600,000 10% Convertible Senior Notes converted all of the outstanding notes into 10,744,249 shares of our common stock (which include 261,535 shares for accrued interest through the date of conversion) and as of September 30, 2004, we have no Senior Notes outstanding.

          Between July 7 and July 12, 2004, holders of our options representing 3,287,500 shares exercised their options by paying a total of $1,318,000 to us and as of September 30, 2004, we have no outstanding stock options.

          On July 14, 2004, holders of our warrants exercisable into 947,140 shares exercised the warrants on a cash basis into 947,140 shares of our common stock by paying a total of $711,000 to us. On July 12, 2004, Solitario exercised warrants exercisable into 3,771,428 shares of common stock on a cashless basis and received 2,398,319 shares of our common stock. As of November 5, 2004, we have warrants outstanding which are exercisable for up to 8,243,335 shares with an exercise price of $0.75 per share and which expire in October 2006. See Note 6 and 8 to our unaudited financial statements.

          On July 26, 2004, we completed a spin-off of Solitario's shares to our shareholders, whereby each of our shareholders received 0.2169 shares of Solitario common stock for each Crown share they owned. As part of the spin-off, on July 26, 2004, we retained 998,306 Retained Shares for the benefit of our warrant holders who will receive those shares when the warrant holders exercise their warrants. During the three months ended September 30, 2004, we distributed 48,293 Retained Shares upon the exercise of warrants and at September 30, 2004, had 950,013 Retained Shares. We carry our investment in retained shares of Solitario at fair value with changes in the fair value recorded in the statement of operations. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, we recorded a gain of $1,030,000 on our investment in the Retained Shares and have recorded a liability for our entire investment balance, which is included in unexerc ised warrant liability, see Note 6 to our unaudited financial statements. In addition, we retained 93 Solitario shares, from fractional shares, which we intend to sell. After the disposition of the Retained Shares and fractional shares, we will no longer own any shares of Solitario.

          As part of the Corporate Reorganization in 2002, we issued $2,000,000 in 10% convertible Secured Notes and $4,000,000 in convertible Subordinated Notes. On November 21, 2003 the Secured Notes were called for redemption, and prior to December 31, 2003, $1,994,000 of Secured Notes were converted into 5,679,142 shares of our common stock, with the remainder being redeemed for cash. On October 31, 2003 and November 5, 2003 a total of $839,331 of Subordinated Notes were converted into 1,119,108 shares of our common stock. On November 5, 2003 the remaining $3,160,669 of Subordinated Notes were automatically converted into 4,214,225 shares of our common stock.

          On February 21, 2003, we issued $2,705,000 of 10% Convertible Subordinated B Notes. On November 5, 2003, $2,705,000 of Subordinated B Notes automatically converted into 3,606,667 shares of our common stock.

(c.) Corporate Reorganization

          On March 8, 2002, we filed a voluntary petition for protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the "Bankruptcy") in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado (the "Court"). As part of the Bankruptcy we filed a Plan of Reorganization (the "Plan") and a Disclosure Statement with the Court on March 25, 2002. On May 30, 2002, the Court confirmed the Plan, which became effective on June 11, 2002 (the "Effective Date"). As part of the Plan, we restructured our existing $15 million 5.75% Convertible Subordinated Debentures due August 2001 (the "Debentures").

          The restructuring was completed through an exchange of outstanding Debentures, including any accrued interest thereon for the following consideration: (i) issuance of $1,000,000 in cash, (ii) $2,000,000 in 10% Convertible Secured Notes (the "Secured Notes") convertible into Crown common shares at $0.35 per share, (iii) $4,000,000 of convertible unsecured subordinated notes (the "Subordinated Notes") convertible into common stock of Crown at $0.75 per share, and (iv) warrants, which expire in October 2006 that entitle the holders the right to purchase, in the aggregate, 5,714,285 shares of Crown common stock at an exercise price of $0.75 per share. The interest on the Secured and Subordinated Notes was payable in cash or shares of Crown common stock at the conversion price at our election. In November 2003, all Subordinated Notes were automatically converted into shares of Crown common stock. In December 2003, substantially al l Secured notes were converted into shares of our common stock.

          In order to effect the Plan on the Effective Date, we entered into a Custody and Disbursing Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, Minnesota N.A. (the "Disbursing Agent") as well as trust indentures with Deutsche Bank Trust Company, Americas, as Trustee on the Secured Notes and with Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. as Trustee on the Subordinated Notes. As of November 5, 2004, $180,000 in Debenture certificates have not been presented. If all of these Debentures are presented, the disbursing agent will distribute $12,000 in cash, 68,571 shares of our common stock from the converted Secured Notes (plus accrued interest since June 11, 2002), 64,000 shares of our common stock from the converted Subordinated Notes (plus accrued interest since June 11, 2002), and warrants to acquire 68,571 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $0.75 per share. The Debenture holders have until June 2007 to present their certificates, at which time any undistributed cash, stock and warrants will revert to us.

(d.) Results of Operations

          Limited Revenue Sources

          We currently have no source of recurring revenue and we anticipate any future recurring revenue would only occur after the successful development of the Buckhorn Mountain Project. The successful development of the Buckhorn Mountain Project is dependent on several factors, many of which are beyond our control. Although we are in the late stages of the process of securing the necessary permits for the development of the Buckhorn Mountain Project, we cannot provide any assurance we will be successful in these efforts.

          We have historically derived our revenues from the option and sale of property interests, interest income and to a lesser extent from payments on royalty interests and the sale of our share of gold produced on our properties. Revenues from the option and sale of property interests have consisted of a small number of relatively large transactions. Such transactions have occurred, and in the future are likely to occur, if at all, at irregular intervals and have a significant impact on operating results in the periods in which they occur. In the past, our exploration and development expenditures, including those of Solitario, have constituted the bulk of our activities.

          Three months ended September 30, 2004 compared to September 30, 2003

          For the three months ended September 30, 2004 we had a net loss of $5,568,000, or $0.15 per share, compared to net loss of $813,000, or $0.15 per share for the three months ended September 30, 2003. The increase in the net loss in 2004 primarily related to (i) a$3,253,000 loss on derivative instruments related to the increase in the fair value of our warrants, (ii) income tax expense of $3,203,000 related to a reversal of previously recorded temporary differences between the book and tax basis of Crown's investment in Solitario upon the spin-off and recognition of a liability for anticipated tax gain as well as (iii) an increase in variable stock option compensation expense, which in turn is directly affected by changes in the underlying price of our common shares. We also recorded increases in general and administrative costs, associated with our Kinross merger related costs during the three months ended September 30 , 2004 compared to the same period in the prior year. These increases in expenses were partially offset by both a reduction in our equity in loss of Solitario which we ceased including in our results after July 26, 2004, the date of the spin-off, and a gain on the investment in retained shares of Solitario. The change in the relative per share amounts are primarily due to additional shares outstanding from debt conversions and warrant exercises in the third quarter of 2004. Each of these items is discussed in more detail below.

          Exploration expense of $20,000 and $28,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, related to certain property tax and option payments.

          General and administrative expenses increased to $175,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2004 from $165,000 in the same period of 2003, primarily as a result of increased professional fees for legal and accounting services related to our pending merger with Kinross. Legal and accounting costs were $63,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2004, compared to $58,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2003. Amounts charged to Solitario for management fees during the three months ended September 30, 2004 increased to $96,000 from $89,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2003 primarily as a result of higher activity in Solitario, compared to the prior year. Other general and administrative costs, including salaries and other personnel related costs, were comparable during the third quarter of 2004 and 2003.

          Variable stock option compensation expense increased significantly to $1,119,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $848,000 in the same period of 2003. This increase was the result of an increase in the intrinsic value of our stock options of $295,000 due to a net increase in the value of our common stock from $1.75 per share at June 30, 2004 to an average of $1.88 per share in July 2004. In addition, all of the options under variable plan accounting were vested and exercised, resulting in recognition of deferred compensation of $824,000 during the period. Under variable plan accounting, which initially resulted from the re-pricing of existing options in 1999 and 1998, changes in the intrinsic value of the stock options are charged (credited) to expense over the service period (the vesting period) of the related options. Variable plan accounting continues until options are exercised, cancelled or expire. All of our unexercised stock options were exercised during July 2004.

          Our equity in the loss of Solitario was $52,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2004, compared to $139,000 in the same period of 2003. The decrease resulted from Crown's distribution of its holdings of Solitario's shares on July 26, 2004 and no longer including Solitario's expenses beyond that date in the third quarter of 2004.

          On July 1, 2004, as a result of declaring, as a dividend, the distribution of our 9,633,585 shares of Solitario common stock, the classification of our warrants changed from an equity derivative instrument to that of a liability derivative instrument. As a result we began accounting for changes in the fair value of the securities to be issued or distributed upon the exercise of those warrants as a gain or loss in the statement of operations. Additionally, we recorded any changes in the fair value of the Retained Shares as a gain or loss in the statement of operations. During the three months ended September 30, 2004, we recorded a gain on the investment in retained shares of Solitario of $1,030,000 related to the increase in the fair value of the Retained Shares. This increase in the fair value of the Retained Shares was offset by a related increase in the fair value of the unexercised warrant liability related to changes in t he fair value of the Retained Shares to be distributed. During the third quarter of 2004 we recorded loss on derivative instrument of $3,253,000 related to an increase in the fair value of the Retained Shares as well as an increase in the fair value of shares of Crown common stock to be issued under the warrants. There were no similar charges in the prior year quarter.

       We recorded income tax expense of $1,985,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2004 compared to an income tax benefit of $418,000 during the same period of 2003. Although the spin-off of our interest in Solitario to our stockholders is expected to be a taxable transaction, this will not result in current tax due to the utilization of net operating losses. However, because the spin-off of our holdings of Solitario is taxable at the fair market value of the shares distributed, rather than the recorded cost of our holdings, we recorded an increase in our deferred tax liability of $1,066,000 with an offsetting charge to income tax expense for the estimated tax related to the anticipated tax gain. In addition, Crown recorded $2,068,000 as a charge to income tax expense for the reversal of previously recorded deferred tax benefits related to the difference between Crown's book and tax basis in Solitario. The existing deferred tax liability is e xpected to be offset by existing net operating losses. If our pending Merger with Kinross is not completed, we anticipate offsetting any additional operating losses incurred in 2004 against our existing deferred tax liabilities at the statutory rate resulting in a tax benefit.

          Nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to September 30, 2003

          For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, we had a net loss of $5,767,000, or $0.21 per share, compared to net loss of $1,506,000, or $0.31 per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The relative change in net loss per share is primarily due to additional shares outstanding as a result of debt conversion and warrant exercises during 2004. The increase in the net loss in 2004 primarily related to (i) the $3,253,000 loss on derivative instruments discussed above, (ii) income tax expense of $1,881,000 primarily related to a reversal of previously recorded temporary differences between the book and tax basis of Crown's investment in Solitario upon the spin-off and recognition of a liability for anticipated tax gain as well as (iii) increases in general and administrative expenses, associated with our Kinross merger related costs and an increase in our equity in the loss of Solitario during the period in 2004 up to July 26, 2004, the spin-off date, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2003. These increases in expenses were partially offset by both the gain of $1,030,000 on the increase in the fair value of the Retained Shares discussed above and a reduction in variable option compensation expense, which in turn is directly affected by changes in the underlying price of our common shares. Other than the gain of $1,030,000 and the loss of $3,253,000 discussed above, each of these items is discussed in more detail below.

          Exploration expense, related to property tax, option and claim payments, of $30,000 was recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2004, and is comparable to the $28,000 of exploration expense recorded in the same period in the prior year.

          General and administrative expenses increased to $647,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 from $453,000 in the same period of 2003, primarily as a result of increased professional fees for legal and accounting services related to our pending merger with Kinross. Legal and accounting costs were $341,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2004, compared to $130,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2003. Amounts charged to Solitario for management fees during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 increased to $293,000 from $275,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2003 primarily as a result of higher activity in Solitario, compared to the prior year. Other general and administrative costs, including salaries and other personnel related costs, were comparable during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003. If our pending Merger with Kinross is not completed we expect our 2004 full-year gene ral and administrative costs to be comparable to 2003 as a result of ongoing professional service costs related to the Merger, which we have incurred during the first nine months of 2004 and the last three months of 2003.

          Variable stock option compensation expense decreased significantly to $518,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $1,453,000 in the same period of 2003. This decrease was due to vesting of the options, resulting in recognition of deferred compensation of $2,149,000 during the period which was partially offset by a decrease in the net intrinsic value of our options of $1,631,000 due the decrease in the price of our common stock from $2.58 per share at December 31, 2003 to an average of $1.88 per share in July 2004, when the options under variable plan accounting were exercised. Under variable plan accounting, which initially resulted from the re-pricing of existing options in 1999 and 1998, changes in the intrinsic value of the stock options are charged (credited) to expense over the service period (the vesting period) of the related options. Variable plan accounting continues until options are exercised, ca ncelled or expire. All of our unexercised stock options were exercised during July 2004.

          Our equity in the loss of Solitario was $475,000 in the period of 2004 up to July 26, the spin-off date, compared to $354,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The increase resulted from Solitario's increased net exploration expense, higher general and administrative costs, and decreased interest income during 2003. Solitario's increased net exploration expense related to the majority of Solitario's exploration costs on its Pedra Branca Project in Brazil being paid by its joint venture partner on the Project. Solitario's net exploration cost increased from $211,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2003 to $861,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2004. In addition in 2004, Solitario also focused some of its exploration efforts in the first nine months ended September 30, 2004 on newly acquired projects, which also contributed to the increase in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to the same period of 2003. Additionally, Solitario had higher general and administrative expenses, which were $555,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $218,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2003 as a result of increased legal and accounting costs related to Solitario's filing of its Form 10 registration statement with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

          We recorded income tax expense of $1,881,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to an income tax benefit of $774,000 during the same period of 2003. The increase in income tax expense related to the spin-off of our holdings of Solitario being taxable at the fair market value of the shares distributed, rather than the recorded cost of our holdings. In the third quarter of 2004, we recorded an increase in our deferred tax liability of $1,066,000 with an offsetting charge to income tax expense for the estimated tax related to the anticipated tax gain. In addition, Crown recorded $2,068,000 as a charge to income tax expense for the reversal of previously recorded deferred tax benefits related to the difference between Crown's book and tax basis in Solitario. The remaining change in tax expense and benefit from the same period in the prior year was related to the level of pre-tax loss in both periods. If our pen ding Merger with Kinross is not completed, we anticipate offsetting any operating losses incurred in 2004 against our existing deferred tax liabilities at the statutory rate resulting in a tax benefit.

(e.) Liquidity and Capital Resources

          Due to the nature of the mining business, the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties require significant expenditures prior to the commencement of production. We have in the past financed our activities through the sale of debt and equity securities, joint venture arrangements (including project financing) and the sale of interests in our properties. To the extent necessary, we expect to continue to use similar financing techniques.

          Our exploration and development activities and funding opportunities, as well as those of our joint venture partners, may be materially affected by gold price and mineral commodity levels and changes in those levels. The market price of gold and mineral commodities is determined in world markets and is affected by numerous factors, all of which are beyond our control.

          Nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to September 30, 2003

          Net cash used in operating activities decreased to $313,000 in the first nine months of 2004 compared to $581,000 in the first nine months of 2003. The decrease of $268,000 in net cash used in operating activities from the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2003 was primarily due to an increase in current liabilities from December 2003 to September 2004 of $526,000 compared to a decrease in current liabilities of $163,000 from December 2002 to September 2003. Current liabilities increased significantly at September 30, 2004 as a result of significant additional permitting work at the Buckhorn Mountain Project during the third quarter of 2004, which had not been paid as of September 30, 2004. This increase in current liabilities mitigated increased general and administrative costs for legal and accounting work associated with the Kinross Merger as well as an increase in curre nt assets at September 30, 2004 from the prior year end compared to a decrease in current assets at September 30, 2003 from the prior year end.

          Net cash used in investing activities increased to $1,803,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $696,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2003 as a result of our increased efforts at the Buckhorn Mountain Project during the nine months ended September 30, 2004. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004 we expended $1,622,000 on non-interest costs in development of our Buckhorn Mountain Project compared to $684,000 during the same period of 2003. In 2004, we incurred costs for permitting and engineering services on the Buckhorn Mountain Project utilizing the Kettle River Mill pursuant to our toll-milling agreement with Kinross. The expenditures during 2003 included work performed to analyze on-site milling and tailings facilities, a study of our underground mining plan and costs to completion of a drilling program, all three of which were necessary to complete the Buckhorn Mountain Project fea sibility study, which was prepared by Steffen Robertson and Kirsten, an independent mining and consulting firm ("SRK") during 2003. We capitalized interest paid in cash during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 of $181,000 compared to no capitalized interest paid in cash during the nine months ended September 30, 2003, as all interest costs during the nine months ended September 30, 2003 were related to a combination of accrued interest and amortization of note discounts of $359,000 and shares of our common stock issued as interest of $1,453,000. If our pending Merger with Kinross is not completed, we expect our 2004 net cash used in investing activities to increase compared to 2003 as we currently estimate we will spend approximately $2,300,000 for permitting and development at our Buckhorn Mountain Project in 2004.

          All interest costs, including non-cash interest costs, for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 have been capitalized as part of our development of the Buckhorn Mountain Project. We capitalized interest costs of $3,881,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $1,812,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. Interest costs increased significantly during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to 2003 primarily as a result of interest cost of $3,104,000 capitalized upon the conversion of our Senior Notes as well as additional interest of $397,000 from the issuance of common stock for interest upon the conversion of our Senior Notes compared to $628,000 of capitalized interest costs during the nine months ended September 30, 2003 related to the issuance of shares of our common stock as interest at market prices above the conversion price, which is charged as interest cost. We expec t our interest costs to significantly decline for the full year for 2004 from 2003 as a result of conversion of our Senior, Secured, Subordinated and Subordinated B Notes.

          Net cash provided by financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was $2,066,000, related to proceeds from the exercise of warrants and options compared to cash provided of $2,667,000 in the same period of 2003 primarily resulting from the issuance of $2,705,000 Subordinated B Notes in February 2003.

(f.) Contractual obligations and planned expenditures

          We expect expenditures for non-interest permitting and development expenditures at our Buckhorn Mountain Project to be approximately $2,300,000 in 2004. The bulk of these costs will be for completion of a supplemental draft environmental impact statement related to the currently filed amended plan of operations for the Buckhorn Mountain Project. This plan assumes the ores from the Buckhorn Mountain Project will be trucked to Kinross' Kettle River Mill and will be processed in accordance with our toll milling agreement with Kinross. Additionally, we will pay certain claim maintenance fees and legal expenses to maintain our interest in the Buckhorn Mountain Project. The capital costs of the Buckhorn Mountain Project, through initial production, are currently estimated to be approximately $32.6 million, assuming the toll milling discussed above. If the pending Merger is not completed, we will require significant new financial re sources in order to develop the Buckhorn Mountain Project, which may be in the form of a joint venture, project or debt finance, or issuance of equity. There is no assurance we will be able to obtain the necessary financial resources on acceptable terms.

          Future contractual obligations and cash commitments at September 30, 2004 include the payment of: long-term debt, unpatented mining claim payments, and operating leases, as follows:

(in thousands)

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008+

Total

Long-term debt

50 

50

-  

-  

-  

100

Unpatented mining claim payments  1

17 

17

17

17

17

85

Asset retirement obligation

     -  

        - 

       - 

-  

   60

     60

Operating leases

   15 

    39

   20

   -  

    -  

   74

  Total commitments

$   82 

$ 106

$ 37

$  17

$   77

$ 319

             

1 Assumes continued payment of mining claim payments on existing mineral properties.

          Cash and cash equivalents amounted to $2,315,000 at September 30, 2004. These funds are generally invested in short-term interest-bearing deposits and securities, pending investment in current and future projects. Working capital, calculated as current assets less current liabilities, was $1,849,000 at September 30, 2004.

(g.) Related party transactions

          We provide management and technical services to Solitario under a management and technical services agreement originally signed in April 1994 and modified in April 1999, December 2000 and July 2002. Under the modified agreement Solitario is billed by us for services at 25% of our corporate administrative costs for executive and technical salaries, benefits and expenses, 50% of our corporate administrative costs for financial management and reporting salaries, benefits, expenses and 75% of our corporate administrative costs for investor relations salaries, benefits and expenses. In addition, Solitario reimburses us for direct out-of-pocket expenses. These allocations are based upon the estimated time and expenses spent by our management and employees on both our activities and Solitario activities. Management believes these allocations are reasonable and the allocations are periodically reviewed by management and approved by in dependent Board members of both Crown and Solitario. Management service fees are billed monthly, due on receipt and are generally paid within thirty days. Management service fees paid by Solitario were $96,000 and $293,000 for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively. Management service fees paid by Solitario were $89,000 and $275,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively.

          On July 26, 2004, we completed a spin-off of Solitario's shares to our shareholders, whereby each of our shareholders received 0.2169 shares of Solitario common stock for each Crown share they owned. As part of the spin-off, on July 26, 2004, we retained 998,306 Retained Shares for the benefit of our warrant holders who will receive those shares when the warrant holders exercise their warrants. During the three months ended September 30, 2004, we distributed 48,293 Retained Shares upon the exercise of warrants and at September 30, 2004, had 950,013 Retained Shares. We carry our investment in Retained Shares at fair value with changes in the fair value recorded in the statement of operations. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, we recorded a gain of $1,030,000 on our investment in the Retained Shares. We have recorded a liability for our entire investment balance, which is included in unexercised warrant liability, see Note 6 to the unaudited financial statements. In addition, we retained 93 Solitario shares, from fractional shares, which we intend to sell. After the disposition of the Retained Shares and fractional shares, we will no longer own any shares of Solitario.

          Effective with the completion of the spin-off and assuming the successful acquisition of Crown by Kinross, the Management Agreement will be terminated and Solitario will contract directly with our management and directly pay all administrative expenses. In the event that the Kinross transaction is not completed, we anticipate that we would continue to operate under the Management Agreement with Solitario.

          Christopher E. Herald, and Mark E. Jones, III are directors of both Solitario and us. Christopher E. Herald, James R. Maronick and Walter H. Hunt are officers of both Solitario and us. If the transaction between Crown and Kinross is completed, we anticipate Mr. Herald and Mr. Jones will not be among our directors and Mr. Herald, Mr. Maronick and Mr. Hunt will not be our officers.

          In October 2001, Solitario invested in two 10% convertible secured promissory notes ("Senior Notes") totaling $1,000,000 of the $3,600,000 Senior Notes issued by us. The proceeds from the first Senior Note (the "Solitario Note") of $350,000 were delivered to us. The proceeds from the second Senior Note of $650,000 were placed in escrow pending the outcome of our voluntary petition for bankruptcy, filed in United States Bankruptcy Court, which was filed on March 8, 2002 (the "Bankruptcy"). In March 2002 an additional $200,000 was advanced to us out of escrow of which Solitario's share of the advance was $56,000. Our plan of reorganization was confirmed on May 30, 2002 and the remaining balance of the proceeds plus interest was released to us on the effective date of the Bankruptcy, June 11, 2002. The independent Board members of Crown and Solitario approved the transaction. The terms of the transaction on the second Senior No te were the same as given to our other senior lenders (the "Senior Lenders") and, with regard to the terms of the $350,000 Solitario Note, the terms were negotiated with and approved by the other Senior Lenders. We paid Solitario $50,000 in cash as interest income under the Senior Notes for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, Solitario was paid 89,522 and 249,718, respectively, in Crown shares as interest income under the Senior Notes. On July 14, 2004, Solitario converted its $1,000,000 face value of Crown Senior Notes into 3,132,509 shares of our common stock, which included 75,367 shares issued for accrued interest through the date of conversion on the Senior Notes.

          As part of the investment in the Senior Notes, Solitario also received two warrants. The first warrant gave Solitario the right to purchase 1,857,143 of our shares for $0.75 through October 2006. The second warrant gives Solitario the right to purchase 1,200,000 of our shares at $0.60 through October 2006. On July 12, 2004, Solitario exercised these two Crown warrants on a cashless exercise basis per the terms of the warrants. Solitario received a total of 1,973,626 shares of our common stock from the exercise of these warrants. See also Note 6 to the unaudited financial statements.

          We entered into a Voting Agreement dated as of April 15, 2002 among Zoloto Investors, LP ("Zoloto") and Solitario. Zoloto and Solitario are both shareholders of Crown (the "Signing Shareholders"). Pursuant to the Voting Agreement, Zoloto and Solitario agreed that each will vote its owned shares during the term of the Voting Agreement for the election of three designees of Zoloto and one designee of ours (the "Designee Directors") to the Board of Directors of Crown. The Signing Shareholders agreed that any shares received by either Signing Shareholder would be subject to the Voting Agreement during its term and any successor, assignee or transferee of shares from either Signing Shareholder would be subject to the terms of the Voting Agreement during its term. The Voting Agreement terminates on June 25, 2006. As of September 30, 2004, the Signing Shareholders collectively held 12,695,186 shares or 31.7% of our outstanding shar es. In addition the Signing Shareholders hold warrants which could be exercised for an additional 5,714,285 of our shares or a total of 18,409,472 or 38.1% of our then outstanding shares.

          Solitario has entered into a stockholder and voting agreement with Kinross, along with several of our directors, our executive officers and entities affiliated with these directors and officers (collectively the "Signatories"), pursuant to which the Signatories agreed, among other things, to convert any Senior Notes held by them to common shares prior to the record date for the special meeting, to vote, or cause to be voted, all of the shares of our common stock owned by them, as set forth in the stockholder and voting agreement, as well as all shares of our common stock acquired by them, as set forth in the stockholder and voting agreement, in favor of the approval of the plan of merger, and against the acquisition of us by any person other than Kinross. As of September 30, 2004, 14,891,278 shares of Crown common stock were subject to the stockholder and voting agreement, representing approximately 37.2% of the outstan ding shares of Crown common stock entitled to vote at the Crown special meeting. Additionally, as of November 5, 2004, the Signatories hold Crown warrants for 5,714,286 shares, which could be exercised prior to the vote for a total of 20,605,564 Crown shares or approximately 42.7% of our then outstanding shares.

(h.) Critical Accounting Policies

Mineral Properties, net

          On January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141, "Business Combinations" and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," which, among other things, required the reclassification of our mineral properties as mineral interests (intangible assets). Our mineral interests represent mineral use rights for parcels of land not owned by us. Our mineral interests relate to exploration stage properties and the value of such intangible assets is primarily driven by the nature and amount of economic minerals believed to be contained, or potentially contained, in such properties. SFAS No. 141 required the amortization of mineral interests over their expected useful lives or until it has been determined the mineral interest contained proven and probable reserves. As all of our capitalized costs since January 1, 2002, have related to the Buckhorn Mountain Pro ject that has proven and probable reserves, we did not recorded any amortization of those costs. On April 30, 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position ("FSP") amending SFAS No. 141 and SFAS No. 142 pursuant to Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") No. 04-2 (see "Recent Accounting Pronouncements," below) to provide that certain mineral use rights are considered tangible assets and that mineral use rights should be accounted for based on their substance. See Recent Accounting Pronouncements below. The FSP is effective for the first reporting period beginning after April 29, 2004, with early adoption permitted. We adopted EITF 04-2 on April 1, 2004 and reclassified all of our mineral interests conveyed by leases from Mineral interests, net to Mineral Properties, net in our balance sheets.

          All of our capitalized costs included in Mineral Properties, net relate to the Buckhorn Mountain Project, a mineral property with proven and probable reserves. These costs will be depleted using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the reserves. If there are insufficient reserves to use as a basis for depleting such costs, they are written off as a mineral property impairment in the period in which the determination is made. Interest costs are capitalized on mineral properties under development. Interest is capitalized by applying a weighted average interest rate, including the effect of any discounts, to the average capitalized costs during a period, up to a maximum of total interest costs incurred during the period. We capitalized all of our interest costs of $3,531,000 and $3,881,000, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004. We capitalized all of our interest costs of $697 ,000 and $1,812,000, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003. At September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 a total of $17,766,000 and $13,885,000, respectively, of interest costs have been capitalized as mineral interests and mineral properties at our Buckhorn Mountain Project.

Exploration, amortization and impairment

          We expense all exploration costs incurred on our mineral interests, other than acquisition costs, prior to the establishment of proven and probable reserves. Upon identifying proven and probable reserves, we capitalize substantially all costs incurred including drilling, permitting and development as mineral property costs. Costs on mineral interests with proven and probable reserves which support development of proven and probable reserves or which expand existing proven and probable reserves are capitalized and amortized using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the reserves. We regularly perform evaluations of our investment in mineral interests to assess the recoverability and or the residual value of our investments in these assets. All long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances change which indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, utilizing established guidelines based upon discounted future net cash flows from the asset or upon the determination that certain exploration properties do not have sufficient potential for economic mineralization. There were no mineral interest impairments during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 or 2003.

Reserves

          Our proven and probable reserves are based on extensive drilling, sampling, mine modeling and metallurgical testing from which economic feasibility has been determined. The price sensitivity of reserves depends upon several factors including grade, waste-to-ore ratio, and ore type. The reserves are estimated based on information available at the time the reserves are calculated. Recovery rates vary depending on the metallurgical properties of each deposit and the production process used. The reserve assumes the average recovery rate for the deposit, which takes into account the processing methods scheduled to be used. The cutoff grade, or lowest grade of mineralized material considered economic to process, varies with material type, metallurgical recoveries, and operating costs. The proven and probable reserves figures presented herein are estimates, and no assurance can be given that the indicated levels of recovery of gold wi ll be realized. Ounces of gold in the proven and probable reserves are prior to any losses during metallurgical treatment. Reserve estimates may require revision based on actual production experience. Market price fluctuations of gold, as well as increased production costs or reduced recovery rates, could render proven and probable reserves containing relatively lower grades of mineralization uneconomic to exploit and might result in a reduction of reserves. As discussed below, the ultimate recovery of our mineral reserves is dependent on obtaining necessary permits for the Buckhorn Mountain Project.

Gain and loss on derivative instruments and trading securities

          On July 1, 2004 as a result of declaring, as a dividend, the distribution of our investment in 9,633,585 shares of Solitario, our warrants could be settled in both the Retained Shares and our own common stock. This required the change in the classification of our warrants from an equity derivative instrument to that of a liability derivative instrument, pursuant to SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." We have recorded the fair value of the warrants and our investment in Solitario using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Any subsequent changes in the fair value of the securities to be issued or distributed upon the exercise of our warrants are recorded as a gain or loss in the statement of operations. In addition, as a result of classifying this investment as a trading security in accordance with SFAS No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Se curities," we record any gains or losses on the increase in the fair value of our investment in Solitario in the statement of operations

          The Black-Scholes option-pricing model utilizes certain assumptions about the underlying securities to determine the fair value of our unexercised warrants and our investment in Solitario. These assumptions include (i) the current quoted market price of the underlying securities as an estimate of intrinsic value, (ii) an estimate of the historical volatility of the underlying securities based upon the closing market price for the securities over the last five years, (iii) a risk free interest rate based upon the current quoted interest rate for a similar-term United States Treasury strip securities and (iv) the estimated life of the warrants based upon their current expiration date. Changes in these factors could have a material impact on our reported financial position, and results of operations.

(i.) Environmental, Permitting and Legal

          In July 2001, we became the sole owner of the Crown Jewel project and renamed it the Buckhorn Mountain Project. Previously, the Crown Jewel Project had been subject to a joint venture agreement between Crown and Battle Mountain. Battle Mountain had proposed an open-pit mining operation with an on-site processing facility. Battle Mountain's proposed open-pit Crown Jewel Project was subjected to numerous permitting and legal challenges and delays. In January 2000, the Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board (the "PCHB") vacated the previously granted 401 Water Quality Permit and certain water rights for the Crown Jewel Project. Other permits previously granted to the Crown Jewel Project have since lapsed and will have to be reacquired as part of the ongoing permitting process.

          As part of the analysis of the Buckhorn Mountain Project subsequent to the January 2000 PCHB ruling, we retained Gochnour and Associates ("Gochnour") to review the required permits for a potential combination underground and open-pit-mine design for the Buckhorn Mountain Project ore deposit. Gochnour indicated this mine design would require conducting additional baseline studies and collecting data for modeling to amend previously approved permits as well as to obtain permits for activities that were not previously contemplated, for example the underground mining effects on ground water. Gochnour indicated the underground alternative would also require mitigation of environmental impacts. The Gochnour report concluded the proposed mine design is legally permittable.

          During 2002, we began seeking regulatory approval and permits to operate an exclusively underground mining operation at the Buckhorn Mountain Project. In May 2003, we submitted our Initial Buckhorn Mountain Project Plan of Operations with the United States Forest Service and the Washington State Department of Ecology. The Initial Buckhorn Mountain Project Plan of Operations was deemed complete by the USFS in August 2003. This plan proposed a processing facility seven miles from the mine that we would construct, own, and operate. The ore would have been trucked from the mine to the mill. We believed this development plan significantly reduced the environmental impacts compared to the Crown Jewel open-pit mining plan proposed by Battle Mountain.

          Subsequent to the signing of the toll milling agreement with Echo Bay Minerals, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kinross, we filed an amended Buckhorn Mountain Project plan of operations as outlined in the SRK feasibility study that provides for trucking of ore from the mine to the Kettle River processing facility owned by Kinross. This new development plan further reduces environmental impacts in comparison to the previous Buckhorn Mountain Project Plan of Operations by eliminating the need for new milling and tailings disposal facilities.

          Although we are not aware of any laws or regulations which would be violated by the mine design proposed in the SRK feasibility study, there will continue to be uncertainty regarding our ability to obtain the necessary permits from the regulatory authorities in a timely manner. Construction of the Buckhorn Mountain Project will not begin prior to the successful issuance of the remaining permits and resolution of the potential future legal and administrative challenges. Potential delays due to the appeals process, permit process or litigation are difficult to quantify.

(j) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

          The Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") formed a committee ("Committee") to evaluate certain mining industry accounting issues, including issues arising from the application of SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations" ("SFAS No. 141") and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("SFAS No. 142") to issues that included whether mineral interests conveyed by leases represent tangible or intangible assets and the amortization of such assets. In March 2004, the EITF reached a consensus in EITF Issue No. 04-2 "Whether Mineral Rights Are Tangible or Intangible Assets" ("EITF No. 04-2"), subject to ratification by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"), that mineral interests conveyed by leases should be considered tangible assets. On March 31, 2004, the FASB ratified the consensus of the EITF that mineral interests conveyed by leases should be considered tangible assets subject to the finalization of a FASB Staff Position ("FSP") in this regard. On April 30, 2004, the FASB issued a FSP amending SFAS No. 141 and SFAS No. 142 to provide that certain mineral use rights are considered tangible assets and that mineral use rights should be accounted for based on their substance. The FSP is effective for the first reporting period beginning after April 29, 2004, with early adoption permitted. We adopted EITF No. 04-2 on April 1, 2004 and reclassified all of our mineral interests conveyed by leases from Mineral interests, net to Mineral Properties, net in our balance sheets and will not amortize exploration stage mineral interests prior to the commencement of production.

          In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" ("FIN 46") and in December 2003 issued FIN 46R. FIN 46 requires the consolidation of variable interest entities which have one or both of the following attributes (1) the equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional financial support from other parties which is provided by other parties that will absorb some or all of the expected losses of the entity, (2) the equity investors lack controlling financial interest as evidenced by (i) the ability to make decisions regarding the entity's activities through voting or similar rights (ii) the obligation to absorb expected losses, which make it possible for the entity to finance its activities and (iii) the right to receive expected residual returns of the entity if they occur, which is the compensation for absorbing the expected losses. FIN 46 was immediately effective for variable interest entities formed after January 31, 2003. FIN 46R requires the adoption of either FIN 46 or FIN 46R in financial statements of public entities that have interests in structures that are commonly referred to as special purpose entities for periods ending after December 15, 2003. Application for all other types of variable interest entities is required in financial statements for periods ending after March 15, 2004. The adoption of FIN 46 and FIN 46R did not have an effect on our financial position or results of operations.

          In April 2004, the EITF issued EITF Issue No. 04-3 "Mining Assets: Impairment and Business Combinations" ("EITF No. 04-3") which evaluated certain issues related to values in mining properties beyond proven and probable reserves (VBPP) and the effects of anticipated fluctuations in the future market price of minerals. The EITF reached a consensus that fair value of mining properties generally includes both VBPP and the effects of anticipated fluctuations in the future market price of minerals and that entities should generally include both in determining the fair value allocated to mining assets in a purchase price allocation and in the cash flow analysis (both discounted and undiscounted) used for determining whether a mining asset is impaired. The consensus reached by the EITF should be applied prospectively in the periods after March 31, 2004, but early application is permitted in periods for which financi al statements have not been issued. The adoption of EITF No. 04-3 did not have any impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

The fair value our investment in our unexercised warrant liabilities and our investment in Solitario at September 30, 2004 have been determined utilizing a Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

(a)  Equity Price Risks

          We have estimated that a hypothetical increase of ten percent in the equity price of our common stock will decrease the value of our future earnings and increase the fair value of our unexercised warrant liability by $1,544,000 as of September 30, 2004. We have estimated that a hypothetical decrease of ten percent in the equity price of our common stock will increase the value of our future earnings and decrease in the fair value of our unexercised warrant liability by $1,524,000 as of September 30, 2004.

          We have estimated that a hypothetical increase of ten percent in the equity price of Solitario common stock will increase the value of our future earnings and the fair value of our investment in Solitario by $118,000 as of September 30, 2004. We have estimated that a hypothetical decrease of ten percent in the equity price of Solitario common stock will decrease the value of our future earnings and the fair value of our investment in Solitario by $104,000 as of September 30, 2004.

(b)  Interest Rate Risks

          A hypothetical increase of ten percent in the risk-free interest rate used in our Black-Scholes option-pricing model would not have had a material effect on our future earnings, fair values or cash flows.

          Crown has no material interest rate risks related to its debt instruments as of September 30, 2004 as a result of the conversion of its Senior Notes during the third quarter of 2004.

        (c)  Fluctuations in Commodity Prices

          We are also exposed to commodity price risks for changes in the price of precious and base metals insofar as such changes may affect the economic viability of our exploration and development projects. A change of 10% in the price of gold, silver or zinc would not have had a material change in our assets, liabilities or net income. Given that our feasibility study for the Buckhorn Mountain Project utilized a gold price of $350 per ounce, and that the closing gold price on November 2, 2004 was $416 per ounce, a 10% downward change in the price of gold would not require a revision of our reported reserves, or capitalized costs.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

          Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures and the design and operation of our system of internal controls as of September 30, 2004 pursuant to Rule 13a-15 (b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act").

          Even an effective internal control system, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations-including the possibility of the circumvention or overriding of controls. Therefore, our internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the reliability of our financial reporting and financial statement preparation.

           The Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Deloitte and Touche, LLP ("Deloitte"), advised the audit committee on November 22, 2004 that Deloitte identified matters that resulted in adjustments that had a material effect on the Company's financial reporting process. Such adjustments are the result of a deficiency either in the design or operation of Crown's disclosure controls and procedures and implementation of generally accepted accounting principles. Deloitte further advised the Company that it believes that these matters constitute a significant deficiency under standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). The adjustments related to properly applying accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America to the accounting surrounding the spin-off of Solitario in July 2004. These adjustment s required the recording of the fair value of our investment in Solitario, the recording of our warrant liability at fair value, an adjustment to our accumulated deficit and recording the net change in fair value of these items in our statement of operations. All of these adjustments are recorded in our condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004.

          We have taken steps to improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and our system of internal controls that include, among other things, increasing education and training for our financial and accounting staff, instituting a policy to hire consultants with experience in reviewing unique transactions similar to the Solitario spin-off and budgeting and planning to implement new financial and accounting software to automate our system to better track unique transactions.

          Based on their evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the system of disclosure controls were not effective as of September 30, 2004. After the adjustments recorded above and in consideration of the steps taken above to improve our disclosure controls and procedures our system of internal controls over financial reporting discussed above, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our September 30, 2004 condensed consolidated financial statements are fairly presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and that such financial statements include the information required to be disclosed under the Exchange Act.

          There was no change in the our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004 that materially affected, or that is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Safe Harbor

          The information set forth in this report includes "forward-looking" statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, and is subject to the safe harbor created by those sections. Factors that could cause results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the timing of receipt of necessary governmental permits, the market price of gold, results of current exploration activities and other risk factors detailed in Crown's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

          None

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

          None

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

          None

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

          None

Item 5. Other Information

          None

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibits

2.1

Acquisition Agreement and Agreement and Plan of Merger dated November 20, 2003 between Kinross Gold Corporation and Crown (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Crown's Form 8-K filed on November 21, 2003)

3.1

Crown's Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-4, Commission File No. 33-25033 (the "1989 S-4 Registration Statement")).

3.2

Crown's Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the 1989 S-4 Registration Statement).

4.1

Form of Convertible Note Purchase Agreement and related exhibits dated October 19, 2001 whereby Crown issued $3.6 million in convertible secured notes, convertible into 10,485,714 shares of common stock and warrants which may be exercised into 10,485,714 shares of Crown common stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to Crown's form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001).

9.1

Stockholder and Voting Agreement, dated November 20, 2003 between Kinross and certain shareholders of Crown (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Crown's Form 8-K filed on November 21, 2003)

9.2

Voting Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2002, by and among Crown, Zoloto Investor's, LP and Solitario Resources Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Crown's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003)

31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) as adopted

pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

CROWN RESOURCES CORPORATION

November 22, 2004

Date

By:

/s/ James R. Maronick
James R. Maronick
Chief Financial Officer