Back to GetFilings.com







UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM l0-Q

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2004

Commission file number 000-17248

OWENS MORTGAGE INVESTMENT FUND,
a California Limited Partnership

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)




California
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
68-0023931
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

2221 Olympic Boulevard
Walnut Creek, California
(Address of principal executive
offices)


94595
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number,
including area code


(925) 935-3840


                           Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

                           Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]










TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Page

Item 1.

Financial Statements

3

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations

16

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

26

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

27



PART II – OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

27   

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

27

Item 6.

Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

27


Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32







  PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

  Item 1. Financial Statements

OWENS MORTGAGE INVESTMENT FUND,
a California Limited Partnership

Consolidated Balance Sheets

September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003

(UNAUDITED)
September 30
2004
December 31
2003
                                                      ASSETS            
Cash and cash equivalents     $ 34,304,623   $ 6,632,997  
Loans secured by trust deeds, net of allowance for    
  losses of $4,100,000 in 2004 and 2003       241,686,744     262,274,206  
Interest and other receivables       2,496,830     3,758,922  
Due from affiliate       62,257     192,647  
Real estate held for sale, net of allowance for losses    
  of $743,000 in 2004 and $660,000 in 2003       24,632,230     13,163,574  
Real estate held for investment, net of accumulated depreciation    
  and amortization of $1,131,841 in 2004 and $812,370 in 2003       22,999,919     15,394,293  


      $ 326,182,603   $ 301,416,639  


                                         LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL    
LIABILITIES:    
Accrued distributions payable     $ 555,085   $ 573,725  
Due to general partner       1,191,579     1,166,522  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities       4,825,308     210,994  
Note payable       9,713,742     8,877,203  
Note payable to general partner       1,102,895     --  
Line of credit payable       22,845,000     6,000,000  


     Total Liabilities       40,233,609     16,828,444  


Minority interest       204,737     123,927  


PARTNERS’ CAPITAL (units subject to redemption):    
General partner       2,813,101     2,805,528  
Limited partners       282,931,156     281,658,740  


     Total partners’ capital       285,744,257     284,464,268  


      $ 326,182,603   $ 301,416,639  



                           The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements








OWENS MORTGAGE INVESTMENT FUND,
a California Limited Partnership

Consolidated Statements of Income
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 (Unaudited)

For the Three Months Ended For the Nine Months Ended
September 30
2004
September 30
2003
September 30
2004
September 30
2003
REVENUES:                    
     Interest income on loans secured by trust deeds     $ 7,075,888   $ 6,821,437   $ 20,901,906   $ 20,850,227  
     Gain (loss) on sale of real estate, net       105,679     413,526     538,989     1,416,335  
     Rental and other income from real estate properties       933,990     712,807     2,538,051     2,152,647  
     Other income       24,856     29,581     65,405     124,522  




     Total revenues       8,140,413     7,977,351     24,044,351     24,543,731  




EXPENSES:    
     Management fees to general partner       1,460,461     1,798,304     3,792,513     3,516,117  
     Servicing fees to general partner       165,129     162,283     505,016     474,353  
     Carried interest to general partner       5,995     3,005     5,995     18,063  
     Administrative       11,100     11,100     33,300     33,300  
     Legal and accounting       41,244     28,329     215,977     127,434  
     Rental and other expenses on real estate properties       1,309,360     384,956     3,184,412     2,199,963  
     Interest expense       424,002     95,941     979,892     284,209  
     Minority interest       12,857     10,055     80,810     (14,542 )
     Provision for loan losses       --     --     --     679,370  
     Provision for losses on real estate held for sale, net       83,294     --     83,294     584,532  
     Recovery of bad debts       --     --     (100,000 )   --  
     Other       15,165     2,555     71,511     66,647  




     Total expenses       3,528,607     2,496,528     8,852,720     7,969,446  




     Net income     $ 4,611,806   $ 5,480,823   $ 15,191,631   $ 16,574,285  




     Net income allocated to general partner     $ 45,701   $ 54,562   $ 150,557   $ 164,316  




Net income allocated to limited partners     $ 4,566,105   $ 5,426,261   $ 15,041,074   $ 16,409,969  




Net income allocated to limited partners    
    per weighted average limited partnership unit     $ .02   $ .02   $ .05   $ .06  




Weighted average limited partnership units       282,549,000     281,163,000     281,958,000     280,285,000  





The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.








OWENS MORTGAGE INVESTMENT FUND,
a California Limited Partnership

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003
(UNAUDITED)

September 30
2004
September 30
2003
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:            
     Net Income     $ 15,191,631   $ 16,574,285  
     Adjustments to reconcile net income    
     to net cash provided by operating activities:    
     Gain on sale of real estate properties       (538,989 )   (1,416,335 )
     Provision for loan losses       --     679,370  
     Provision for losses on real estate held for sale       83,294     584,532  
     Depreciation and amortization       319,471     229,714  
     Changes in operating assets and liabilities:    
       Interest and other receivables       1,281,668     286,238  
       Due from affiliate       130,390     --  
       Accounts payable and accrued liabilities       4,614,314     (29,216 )
       Due to general partner       25,057     410,681  


          Net cash provided by operating activities       21,106,836     17,319,269  



   
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:    
     Purchases of loans secured by trust deeds       (100,303,163 )   (135,256,376 )
     Principal collected on loans       451,678     390,496  
     Loan payoffs       101,563,947     127,834,741  
     Investment in real estate properties       (2,910,893 )   (4,480,461 )
     Net proceeds from disposition of real estate properties       3,931,154     5,863,929  
     Proceeds received from real estate joint venture       --     2,680,715  
     Minority interest in limited liability companies       80,810     (14,573 )


         Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities       2,813,533     (2,981,529 )



   
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:    
     Proceeds from sale of partnership units       1,180,017     1,419,130  
     Accrued distributions payable       (18,640 )   (29,182 )
     Advances on note payable       985,339     627,484  
     Repayments on note payable       (148,800 )   --  
     Net advances (repayments) on line of credit       16,845,000     (2,867,371 )
     Partners’ cash distributions       (5,131,614 )   (5,344,724 )
     Partners’ capital withdrawals       (9,960,045 )   (8,973,909 )


         Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities       3,751,257     (15,168,572 )



   
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents       27,671,626     (830,832 )

   
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period       6,632,997     6,684,418  



   
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period     $ 34,304,623   $ 5,853,586  



   
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information    
     Cash paid during the period for interest     $ 886,937   $ 301,836  



  See notes 2, 3, 7 and 9 for supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.








OWENS MORTGAGE INVESTMENT FUND,
a California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2004

(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

  In the opinion of the management of Owens Mortgage Investment Fund, a California Limited Partnership, (the “Partnership”) the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal, recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial information included therein. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements included in the Partnership’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the full year.

  Basis of Presentation

  The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Partnership and its majority-owned limited liability companies. All significant inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

(2) Loans Secured by Trust Deeds and Allowance for Loan Losses

  Loans secured by trust deeds as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 are as follows:

        2004     2003  


    Income-producing properties     $ 172,166,132     227,559,987  
    Construction       42,706,530     22,044,472  
    Unimproved land       29,699,082     14,309,747  
    Residential       1,215,000     2,460,000  



   
      $ 245,786,744     266,374,206  



   
    First mortgages     $ 244,244,385     260,321,236  
    Second mortgages       1,542,359     6,052,970  



   
      $ 245,786,744     266,374,206  



  Scheduled maturities of loans secured by trust deeds as of September 30, 2004 and the interest rate sensitivity of such loans are as follows:

      Fixed     Variable      
      Interest     Interest      
      Rate     Rate     Total  



Year ending September 30:    
2004 (past maturity)     $ 34,237,802     5,900,000     40,137,802  
2005       94,936,956     197,267     95,134,223  
2006       58,992,627     --     58,992,627  
2007       14,299,139     238,783     14,537,922  
2008       3,005,078     784,774     3,789,852  
2009       5,458,845     --     5,458,845  
Thereafter (through 2014)       918,125     26,817,348     27,735,473  



      $ 211,848,572     33,938,172     245,786,744  




  The following is a schedule by geographic location of loans secured by trust deeds as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003:

September 30, 2004
Balance

Portfolio
Percentage

December 31, 2003
Balance

Portfolio
Percentage

Arizona     $ 27,699,326     1.27% $ 16,729,412     6.28%
California       136,537,385     55.55%   143,353,415     53.82%
Colorado       --     --     1,050,000     0.39%
Connecticut       2,211,036     0.90%   2,382,607     0.89%
Hawaii       15,300,000     6.23%   15,300,000     5.74%
Idaho       1,747,980     0.71%   1,840,741     0.69%
Missouri       3,300,000     1.34%   3,300,000     1.24%
North Carolina       18,715,000     7.61%   18,715,000     7.03%
Nevada       12,102,281     4.92%   37,128,615     13.94%
Oregon       --     --     1,750,000     0.66%
South Carolina       3,301,509     1.35%   3,301,509     1.24%
Texas       2,635,000     1.07%   2,635,000     0.99%
Utah       11,211,980     4.56%   8,080,057     3.03%
Virginia       3,185,000     1.30%   3,185,000     1.20%
Washington       7,840,247     3.19%   7,622,850     2.86%




      $ 245,786,744     100.00% $ 266,374,206   100.00%





  Variable rate loans use as indices the one- and five-year Treasury Constant Maturity Index (2.20% and 3.35%, respectively, as of September 30, 2004), the prime rate (4.75% as of September 30, 2004) or the weighted average cost of funds index for Eleventh or Twelfth District savings institutions (1.875% and 2.20%, respectively, as of September 30, 2004) or include terms whereby the interest rate is adjusted at a specific later date. Premiums over these indices have varied from 250–650 basis points depending upon market conditions at the time the loan is made.

  A majority of the loans made or invested in by the Partnership require the borrower to make a “balloon payment” on the principal amount upon maturity of the loan. To the extent that a borrower has an obligation to pay mortgage loan principal in a large lump sum payment, its ability to satisfy this obligation may be dependent upon its ability to sell the property, obtain suitable refinancing or otherwise raise a substantial cash amount. As a result, these loans involve a higher risk of default than fully amortizing loans.

  As of September 30, 2004, the Partnership has commitments to advance additional funds to borrowers of construction and other loans in the total amount of approximately $11,045,000.

  As of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the Partnership participated in 3 and 7 loans, respectively, with a total principal balance of $26,237,000 and $46,375,000, respectively, with an unrelated mortgage investment group (the “Lead Lender”) that originated the loans with the borrowers. The General Partner receives the payments on these participated loans from the Lead Lender.

  Pursuant to intercreditor and assignment agreements (the “Agreements”) between the Partnership and the Lead Lender on 3 and 4 of the loans as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively, with a total principal balance of $26,237,000 and $32,500,000, respectively, the Partnership is guaranteed its share of interest and principal prior to any other investors participating in such loans. In addition, in the event of borrower default, the Lead Lender will either (i) continue to remit to the Partnership the interest due on the participation amount; (ii) substitute an alternative loan acceptable to the Partnership; or (iii) repurchase the participation from the Partnership for the outstanding balance of the participation plus accrued interest. The Agreements also require the Lead Lender to buy out the Partnership’s participation at the time of acquisition of the underlying collateral (such as through foreclosure) and to indemnify the Partnership as to specified other losses.

  The scheduled maturities for 2004 include approximately $40,138,000 of loans that are past maturity as of September 30, 2004, of which $2,700,000 represents loans for which interest payments are delinquent over 90 days.

  During the three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, the Partnership refinanced loans totaling $272,000 and $16,685,000, respectively.

  The Partnership’s investment in impaired loans that were delinquent in monthly payments greater than ninety days was approximately $16,269,000 and $22,828,000 as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Of these impaired loans, approximately $1,100,000 and $4,363,000, respectively, were in the process of foreclosure and $5,182,000 and $1,600,000, respectively, involved borrowers who were in bankruptcy as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003. In addition, the Partnership’s investment in impaired loans that were past maturity (delinquent in principal) but current in monthly payments was approximately $37,438,000 and $12,279,000 as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.

  The Partnership’s investment in loans delinquent in monthly payments greater than ninety days consisted of four and five loans as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. As of September 30, 2004, $11,087,000 of the delinquent loans has a specific related allowance for credit losses totaling $1,300,000. There is a non-specific allowance for credit losses of $2,800,000 for the remaining delinquent balance and for other loans. The Partnership has discontinued the accrual of interest on all loans that are delinquent in monthly payments greater than ninety days.

  Changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 were as follows:

2004 2003
Balance, beginning of period     $ 4,100,000   $ 4,100,000  
    Provision       --     --  
    Recovery of bad debts       --     --  
    Charge-off       --     --  


Balance, end of period     $ 4,100,000   $ 4,100,000  



  The General Partner believes that the allowance for estimated loan losses is appropriate as of September 30, 2004. The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectibility of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the underlying collateral.

  As of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the Partnership’s loans secured by deeds of trust on real property collateral located in Northern California totaled approximately 47% ($115,458,000) and 46% ($122,031,000), respectively, of the loan portfolio. The Northern California region (which includes the following counties and all counties north: Monterey, Fresno, Kings, Tulare and Inyo) is a large geographic area which has a diversified economic base. The ability of borrowers to repay loans is influenced by the economic strength of the region and the impact of prevailing market conditions on the value of real estate.

(3) Real Estate Held for Sale

  Real estate held for sale includes the following components as of September 30, 2004:

Real estate held for sale     $ 21,540,738  
Investment in limited liability companies       3,091,492  

      $ 24,632,230  


  During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, four lots (three including houses) located in a manufactured home subdivision development located in Ione, California (that was acquired by the Partnership through foreclosure in 1997) were sold for $503,000, resulting in a gain to the Partnership of approximately $106,000.

  Acquisition of Hotel and Casino through Foreclosure and Subsequent Sale

  In February 2004, the Partnership and two co-lenders (the “Sellers”) participated in a Sloan with a principal balance of $22,200,000 foreclosed due to a violation of the bankruptcy stipulation by the borrower and obtained the underlying collateral, a hotel and casino located in Las Vegas, Nevada. The lenders were allowed to remove their cash collateral at the time of foreclosure, which totaled approximately $733,000 ($458,000 to the Partnership). The hotel and casino were closed at the time of foreclosure. Certain expenses have been incurred on the property since foreclosure for utilities, security, maintenance and legal fees, among other items, in the total amount of approximately $1,904,000 ($1,190,000 to the Partnership). In addition, slot machines within the casino were sold at an auction in July 2004 for approximately $536,000 ($335,000 to the Partnership).

  On June 4, 2004, the Sellers had entered into a Purchase Agreement with an unrelated company (the “Assignor”), whereby the Assignor would purchase the property from the Sellers at a price of $21,600,000 secured by a note for the full purchase price. The note was to bear interest at 8% per annum payable monthly and be due in two years.

  On September 27, 2004, the Sellers signed an Assignment Agreement and Release (the “Assignment”) with the Assignor and an unrelated company (the “Assignee”), which assigned the right, title and interest in the Purchase Agreement from the Assignor to the Assignee. In addition, on September 27, 2004, the Sellers signed an Amended and Restated Purchase Agreement (the “Amended Agreement”) with the Assignee or its assigns (the “Buyer”). The Amended Agreement replaced the Purchase Agreement and provided that the Buyer would purchase the Property for $21,767,028 from the Sellers. Although it was signed on September 27, 2004, both it and the Assignment provided that they did not become effective until the close of escrow on October 1, 2004.

  On October 1, 2004, escrows for the related transactions were closed and the Assignment and Amended Agreement were made effective. The Partnership received approximately $13,239,000 as its portion of the net sales proceeds (62.5%), which resulted in a loss to the Partnership of approximately $83,000. This loss was recorded as bad debt expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2004.

  Changes in the allowance for real estate losses for the three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 were as follows:

2004 2003
Balance, beginning of period     $ 660,000   $ 660,000  
    Provision       83,294     --  
    Deductions for real estate sold       --     --  


Balance, end of period     $ 743,294   $ 660,000  



  Investment in Limited Liability Companies

  Oregon Leisure Homes, LLC

  Oregon Leisure Homes, LLC (OLH) was formed in 2001 between the Partnership and an unrelated developer for the purpose of developing and selling eight condominium units located in Lincoln City, Oregon, which were acquired by the Partnership via a deed in lieu of foreclosure.

  The Partnership is co-manager of OLH and receives 70% of the profits after payment of all interest on the original loan is made to the Partnership and priority return on partner contributions is allocated at the rate of 11% per annum. The assets, liabilities, income and expenses of OLH have been consolidated into the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and income statement of the Partnership.

  During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, the Partnership advanced an additional $9,000 to OLH for continued operation and marketing of the condominium units that are for sale and received repayment of advances of $124,000 from collections on notes receivable. The net loss to the Partnership was approximately $3,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2004. The net income to the Partnership (including gains on sales) was approximately $242,000 during the quarter ended September 30, 2003. The Partnership’s investment in OLH real property was approximately $1,122,000 and $1,137,000 as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.

  Dation, LLC

  Dation, LLC (Dation) was formed in 2001 between the Partnership and an unrelated developer for the purpose of developing and selling lots in a mobile home park located in Lake Charles, Louisiana, which were acquired by the Partnership via a deed in lieu of foreclosure. The Partnership has been advancing funds to Dation as needed. The Partnership is co-manager of Dation and receives 50% of the profits and losses after payment of all interest on the original loan is made to the Partnership and priority return on partner contributions is allocated at the rate of 12% per annum.

  Dation sold two lots during the quarter ended September 30, 2004 and repaid $20,000 of the loan to the Partnership. In addition, Dation paid $91,000 of the interest payable to the Partnership during the quarter ended September 30, 2004. The net operating loss to the Partnership was approximately $27,000 and $40,000 during the quarters ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Partnership’s total investment in Dation was approximately $1,970,000 and $1,845,000 as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.

(4) Real Estate Held for Investment

  Bayview Gardens, LLC

  During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the Partnership obtained a deed in lieu of foreclosure on a first mortgage loan secured by an assisted living facility located in Monterey, California in the amount of $5,000,000. The Partnership paid certain past due bills of the former borrower at the time of foreclosure of approximately $109,000 all of which were capitalized to the basis of the property.

  The Partnership is now subject to an existing 2nd deed of trust on the property with the General Partner as the lender, which is recorded as note payable to general partner on the accompanying balance sheet. The principal, accrued interest and other charges on this note of approximately $1,103,000 were capitalized to the basis of the property at the time of foreclosure. Pursuant to an amendment to the note between the Partnership and the general partner dated June 8, 2004, the maturity date on the note was extended to June 8, 2009 and all interest and other accrued charges were deferred until maturity. In addition, the amendment specifies that upon the sale of the property, the General Partner will only be paid the amounts due under the note after the Partnership recovers its basis in the property at the time of sale including any capital improvements made after foreclosure, but excluding the amounts capitalized pursuant to the General Partner note.

  The Partnership created a new entity, Bayview Gardens, LLC (“Bayview”), which is wholly owned by the Partnership. Under the terms of a lease agreement between the Partnership and Bayview, the assisted living facility is leased to Bayview by the Partnership and the facility is managed by an outside property manager. The net loss to the Partnership from Bayview was $102,000 and $159,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively. The assets, liabilities, income and expenses of Bayview have been consolidated into the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and income statement of the Partnership. The Partnership’s investment in Bayview real property was approximately $6,223,000 as of September 30, 2004.

  720 University, LLC

  The Partnership has an investment in a limited liability company, 720 University, LLC (720 University), which owns a commercial retail property located in Greeley, Colorado. The Partnership receives 65% of the profits and losses in 720 University after priority return on partner contributions is allocated at the rate of 10% per annum. The assets, liabilities, income and expenses of 720 University have been consolidated into the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and income statement of the Partnership. The net income to the Partnership was approximately $143,000 and $260,000 during the quarters ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The minority interest of the joint venture partner of approximately $205,000 and $124,000 as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively, is reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Partnership’s investment in 720 University real property was approximately $14,440,000 and $13,063,000 as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.

(5) Transactions with Affiliates

  In consideration of the management services rendered to the Partnership, Owens Financial Group, Inc. (“OFG”), the General Partner, is entitled to receive from the Partnership a management fee payable monthly, subject to a maximum of 2.75% per annum of the average unpaid balance of the Partnership’s mortgage loans.

  All of the Partnership’s loans are serviced by OFG, in consideration for which OFG receives up to .25% per annum of the unpaid principal balance of the loans.

  OFG, at its sole discretion may, on a monthly basis, adjust the management and servicing fees as long as they do not exceed the allowable limits calculated on an annual calendar year basis. Even though the fees for a particular month may exceed one-twelfth of the maximum limits, at the end of the calendar year the sum of the fees collected for each of the twelve months may not exceed the stated limits. Management fees amounted to approximately $1,460,000 and $1,798,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $3,793,000 and $3,516,000, for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Service fee payments to OFG approximated $165,000 and $162,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $505,000 and $474,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

  The maximum servicing fees were paid to the General Partner during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003. If the maximum management fees had been paid to the General Partner during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, the management fees would have been $1,816,000 (increase of $356,000) and $5,555,000 (increase of $1,762,000), respectively, which would have reduced net income allocated to limited partners by approximately 7.7% and 11.6%, respectively, and net income allocated to limited partners per weighted average limited partner unit by the same percentage to $.02 and $.05, respectively. If the maximum management fees had been paid to the General Partner during the nine months ended September 30, 2003, the management fees would have been $5,221,000 (increase of $1,705,000), which would have reduced net income allocated to limited partners by approximately 10.5%, and net income allocated to limited partners per weighted average limited partner unit by the same percentage to $.05.

  In determining the management fees and hence the yield to the partners, OFG may consider a number of factors, including current market yields, delinquency experience, uninvested cash and real estate activities. OFG expects that the management fees it receives from the Partnership will vary in amount and percentage from period to period, and it is highly likely that OFG will again receive less than the maximum management fees in the future. However, if OFG chooses to take the maximum allowable management fees in the future, the yield paid to limited partners may be reduced.

  Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, OFG receives all late payment charges from borrowers on loans owned by the Partnership, with the exception of loans participated with outside entities. The amounts paid to or collected by OFG for such charges totaled approximately $143,000 and $408,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively. In addition, the Partnership remits other miscellaneous fees to OFG, which are collected from loan payments, loan payoffs or advances from loan principal (i.e. funding, demand and partial release fees). Such fees remitted to OFG totaled approximately $3,000 and $46,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively.

  OFG originates all loans the Partnership invests in and receives loan origination fees from borrowers. Such fees earned by OFG amounted to approximately $360,000 (on loans originated of approximately $17,763,000) and approximately $2,285,000 (on loans originated of approximately $107,303,000) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively. In addition, OFG collects extension fees for the extension of the maturity date of Partnership loans. Such fees earned by OFG amounted to approximately $339,000 (on loans extended of approximately $11,337,000) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004.

  The Partnership reimburses OFG for certain administrative salaries, in addition to payroll costs incurred on a Partnership real estate property (which was sold in June 2003). The amounts reimbursed to OFG were approximately $11,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, and approximately $33,000 and $123,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

(6) Note Payable

  The Partnership has a note payable with a bank through its investment in 720 University, which is secured by the retail development in Greeley, Colorado. The note was amended in July 2004 and the total note amount was increased to $10,400,000 ($1,600,000 available for improvements). The note requires monthly interest payments based on the LIBOR rate plus 2.75% (4.5% at September 30, 2004). Monthly principal payments of $28,900 will also be required beginning in June 2006. The loan matures on May 31, 2007. Interest expense for the quarters ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 was approximately $105,000 and $84,000, respectively. The principal balance on the note as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 was approximately $9,714,000 and $8,877,000, respectively. The note contains certain covenants, which the Company has complied with as of September 30, 2004.

(7) Note Payable to General Partner

  The Partnership has a note payable to the General Partner in the amount of $1,102,895 as a result of the deed in lieu of foreclosure obtained on a Partnership loan during the nine months ended September 30, 2004. This amount includes the original loan principal balance of $907,446 and accrued interest and late charges to the date of foreclosure of $195,449. The note was amended at the time of foreclosure in June 2004. The maturity date of the note is June 8, 2009. The principal balance of the original note bears interest at the rate of 12.0% per annum. All interest and other accrued charges are deferred until maturity. In addition, the amendment specifies that upon the sale of the property, the General Partner will only be paid the amounts due under the note after the Partnership recovers its basis in the property at the time of sale including any capital improvements made after foreclosure, but excluding the amounts capitalized pursuant to this note.

(8) Line of Credit Payable

  The Partnership has a line of credit agreement with a group of banks, which provides interim financing on mortgage loans invested in by the Partnership. The amount of credit available under this line of credit is $40,000,000. There was a balance of $22,845,000 and $6,000,000 outstanding on the line of credit as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Interest expense for the quarters ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 was approximately $319,000 and $12,000, respectively. Borrowings under the line of credit bear interest at the bank’s prime rate, which was 4.75% as of September 30, 2004. The line of credit expires on July 31, 2005. The Partnership is required to maintain non-interest bearing accounts in the total amount of $500,000 with two of the banks. The agreement requires the Partnership to meet certain financial covenants including profitability, minimum tangible net worth and total liabilities to tangible net worth. The Partnership has complied with these covenants as of September 30, 2004.

(9) Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Operating and Investing Activities

                  Loans foreclosed and transferred to real estate held for sale       18,875,000  

   
                  Note payable to General Partner assumed at time of foreclosure    
                      of Partnership loan and capitalized to real estate held for sale       1,102,895  








  Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  Forward Looking Statements

                           Some of the information in this Form 10-Q may contain forward-looking statements. Such statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,”“continue” or other similar words. These statements discuss future expectations, contain projections of results of operations or of financial conditions or state other forward-looking information. When considering such forward-looking statements you should keep in mind the risk factors and other cautionary statements in the Partnership’s Form 10-Q. Although management of the Partnership believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, there are certain factors, in addition to these risk factors and cautioning statements, such as general economic conditions, local real estate conditions, adequacy of reserves, or weather and other natural occurrences that might cause a difference between actual results and those forward-looking statements.

  Results of Operations

  Overview

                           Owens Mortgage Investment Fund (the “Partnership”) is a California Limited Partnership that invests in mortgage loans on real property located in the United States that are primarily originated by the Partnership’s general partner, Owens Financial Group, Inc. (the “General Partner”).

                           The Partnership’s primary objective is to generate monthly income from its investment in mortgage loans. The Partnership’s focus is on making mortgage loans to owners and developers of real property whose financing needs are often not met by traditional mortgage lenders. These include borrowers that traditional lenders may not normally consider because of perceived credit risks based on ratings or experience levels, and borrowers who require faster loan decisions. One of the Partnership’s competitive advantages is the ability to approve loan applications more quickly than traditional lenders.

                           The Partnership will originate loans secured by very diverse property types. In addition, the Partnership will occasionally lend to borrowers whom traditional lenders will not normally lend to because of a variety of factors including their credit ratings and/or experience. Due to these factors, the Partnership may make mortgage loans that are riskier than mortgage loans made by commercial banks and other institutional lenders. To compensate for those potential risks, the Partnership seeks to make loans at higher interest rates and with more protection from the underlying real property, such as with lower loan to value ratios.

                           The Partnership’s operating results are affected primarily by:

  o        the amount of cash available to invest in mortgage loans;
o        the level of real estate lending activity in the markets serviced;
o        the ability to identify and lend to suitable borrowers;
o        the interest rates the Partnership is able to charge on loans;
o        the level of delinquencies on mortgage loans;
o        the level of foreclosures and related loan and real estate losses experienced; and
o        the income or losses from foreclosed properties prior to the time of disposal.

                           Economic developments in the United States have generally been favorable in 2004 and this has led to expansion and gains in employment. The strengthening demand has been a factor contributing to the rise in inflation this year. These and other factors led the Federal Reserve Board to increase the discount rate by a total of 0.75% in 2004. The rates that the Partnership charges on its loans have not yet been impacted by these actions. In fact, the weighted average interest rate on Partnership loans declined from 11.2% as of September 30, 2003 to 11.0% as of September 30, 2004. Presently, the General Partner does not expect a noticeable increase in the rates charged on Partnership loans, primarily because there continues to be a shortage of suitable loans for the Partnership to invest in.

                           Partnership lending volume in 2004 has been lower than in the prior two years. This fact coupled with a continuing high level of loan payoffs in 2004 have resulted in increased available cash to the Partnership. This has required the Partnership to remain closed to most additional partner investments since September 2001.

                           If economic conditions worsen in 2004, the Partnership could experience an increase in loan defaults. This would reduce the amount of income available for distribution to partners. Recognizing this risk, the General Partner seeks to maintain a low loan-to-value ratio on its loans, which as of September 30, 2004 was 55% on a weighted average basis. By this means, the Partnership hopes to protect the value of loans in the event of default by providing an increased equity position in underlying real property in the event of foreclosure. Nevertheless, no assurances can be given that a marked increase in loan defaults accompanied by a rapid decline in real estate values will not have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s financial condition and operating results.

                           Historically, the General Partner has focused its operations on California and certain Western states. Because the General Partner has a significant degree of knowledge with respect to the real estate markets in such states, it is likely most of the Partnership’s loans will be concentrated in such states. As of September 30, 2004, 47.0% of loans were secured by real estate in Northern California, while 11.3% and 8.6% were secured by real estate in Arizona and Southern California, respectively. Such geographical concentration creates greater risk that any downturn in such local real estate markets could have a significant adverse effect upon results of operations.

                           Commercial real estate markets in segmented areas of California have continued to prosper. However, there can be no assurance that the rate of growth will continue to increase in the future. A worsening economy, particularly in California and Arizona, could adversely affect the Partnership’s operating results.

  Summary of Financial Results

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2004 2003 2004 2003

                         
    Total revenues     $ 8,140,413   $ 7,977,351   $ 24,044,351   $ 24,543,731  
    Total expenses     $ 3,528,607   $ 2,496,528   $ 8,852,720   $ 7,969,446  





   
    Net income     $ 4,611,806   $ 5,480,823   $ 15,191,631   $ 16,574,285  




   
    Net income allocated to limited partners     $ 4,566,105   $ 5,426,261   $ 15,041,074   $ 16,409,969  




   
    Net income allocated to limited partners    
      per weighted average limited partnership    
      unit     $ .02   $ .02   $ .05   $ .06  




   
    Annualized rate of return to limited    
      partners (1)     6.4%   7.6%   7.1%     7.7%




   
    Distribution per partnership unit (yield) (2)    
      7.3%   7.3%   7.3%     7.4%




   
    Weighted average limited partnership units     282,549,000   281,163,000   281,958,000     280,285,000  





(1) The annualized rate of return to limited partners is calculated based upon the net income allocated to limited partners per weighted average limited partnership unit as of September 30, 2004 and 2003 divided by the number of months during the period and multiplied by twelve (12) months.

(2) Distribution per partnership unit (yield) is the annualized average of the monthly yield paid to the partners for the periods indicated. The monthly yield is calculated by dividing the total monthly cash distribution to partners by the prior month’s ending partners’ capital balance.

  Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 Compared to Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003

  Total Revenues

                           Interest income on loans secured by trust deeds increased $254,000 (3.7%) and $52,000 (0.25%) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2003. This increase was the result of an increase in the weighted average balance of the loan portfolio of 1.8% and 6.4% during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively, as compared to 2003, and due to the collection of past due interest on certain delinquent loans during 2004. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in the weighted average yield of the loan portfolio from 11.3% and 11.5% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively, to 11.1% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004.

                           The mortgage loan portfolio has decreased by $20,587,000 (7.9%) since December 31, 2003, due to the payoff of one loan in the amount of $23,500,000 on September 30, 2004. If suitable replacement loans are not originated by the Partnership, the Partnership’s net income and distributions to partners may decrease, as the current yield on the Partnership’s money market accounts is substantially lower than the yield on mortgage loans.

                           Rental and other income from real estate properties increased $221,000 (31.0%) and $385,000 (17.9%) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2003 as a result of revenue earned from the assisted living facility located in Monterey, California that was obtained via foreclosure in June 2004 and due to a $400,000 lease termination fee collected within 720 University, LLC in April 2004. See further discussion under “Real Estate Properties Held for Sale and Investment” below.

                           Gain on sales of real estate decreased $308,000 (74.4%) and $877,000 (61.9%) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2003, due to the timing of real estate sales activity. Sales of interests in two houses within Oregon Leisure Homes, LLC resulted in gains in the total amount of $291,000 and $329,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively. In addition, a commercial property located in Monterey, California was sold for a gain of $834,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2003. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, a commercial building located in Albany, Oregon was sold for a gain of $233,000 and twelve lots/houses located in the manufactured home subdivision development located in Ione, California were sold for a total gain of $306,000.

  Total Expenses

                           Management fees to the General Partner are paid pursuant to the Partnership Agreement and are determined at the sole discretion of the General Partner. The maximum management fee permitted under the Partnership Agreement is 2 ¾% per year of the average unpaid balance of mortgage loans. For the years 2001, 2002 and 2003 and the nine months ended September 30, 2004 (annualized), the management fees were 1.48%, 1.46%, 2.01% and 1.87% of the average unpaid balance of mortgage loans, respectively.

                           In determining the management fees and hence the yield to the partners, the General Partner may consider a number of factors, including current market yields, delinquency experience, uninvested cash and real estate activities. The General Partner expects that the management fees that it receives from the Partnership will vary in amount and percentage from period to period, and it is highly likely that the General Partner will again receive less than the maximum management fees in the future. However, if the General Partner chooses to take the maximum allowable management fees in the future, the yield paid to limited partners may be reduced.

                           If the maximum management fees had been paid to the General Partner during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, the management fees would have been $1,816,000 (increase of $356,000) and $5,555,000 (increase of $1,762,000), respectively, which would have reduced net income allocated to limited partners by approximately 7.7% and 11.6%, respectively, and net income allocated to limited partners per weighted average limited partner unit by the same percentage to $.02 and $.05, respectively.

                           Rental and other expenses on real estate properties increased $924,000 (240.1%) and $984,000 (44.8%) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2003, primarily due to the acquisition through foreclosure of the assisted living facility located in Monterey, California and the hotel and casino located in Las Vegas, Nevada during 2004. See further discussion under “Real Estate Properties Held for Sale and Investment” below.

                           Interest expense increased $328,000 (341.9%) and $696,000 (244.8%) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2003, due to increased use of the Partnership’s line of credit to invest in loans secured by trust deeds during 2004.

                           Minority interest increased $95,000 (655.7%) during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 as compared to the same period in 2003 due to the $400,000 lease termination fee collected within 720 University, LLC in April 2004. This resulted in an increased amount of income being allocated to the minority interest partner within 720 University.

                           The decrease in the provision for loan losses of $679,000 (100%) and the provision for losses on real estate held for sale of $501,000 (85.8%) during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was the result of analyses performed on the loan and real estate portfolios, which resulted in no change in the allowance for loan losses and an increase in the allowance for real estate of $83,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2004. In addition, during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 the Partnership collected $100,000 from a former borrower of a defaulted loan pursuant to a guarantee agreement (recovery of bad debt).

  Net Income and Annualized Rate of Return to Limited Partners

                           The Partnership’s net income decreased 15.9% and 8.3% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively, and the annualized rate of return to limited partners also decreased, as compared to the same periods in 2003, due primarily to an increase in expenses incurred on two real estate properties that the Partnership obtained through foreclosure during 2004. Expenses incurred on the hotel/casino property located in Las Vegas, Nevada that was obtained through foreclosure in February 2004 were approximately $1,190,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2004. The property was sold on October 1, 2004. See further discussion under “Real Estate Properties Held for Sale and Investment” below.

  Financial Condition

  September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003

  Loan Portfolio

                           The number of Partnership mortgage investments decreased from 95 to 85, and the average loan balance increased from $2,804,000 to $2,892,000 between December 31, 2003 and September 30, 2004.

                           Approximately $16,269,000 (6.6%) and $22,828,000 (8.6%) of the loans invested in by the Partnership were more than 90 days delinquent in monthly payments as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Of these amounts, approximately $1,100,000 (0.4%) and $4,363,000 (1.6%), respectively, were in the process of foreclosure, and approximately $5,182,000 (2.1%) and $1,600,000 (0.6%), respectively, involved loans to borrowers who were in bankruptcy. In addition, the Partnership’s investment in loans that were past maturity (delinquent in principal) but current in monthly payments was approximately $37,438,000 (15.2%) and $12,279,000 (4.6%) as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Of the total past maturity loans as of September 30, 2004, $5,235,000 had the maturity date extended subsequent to quarter end.

                           Loans in the process of foreclosure as of December 31, 2003 consisted of three loans, of which one loan in the amount of $363,000 was paid off by the borrower during the nine months ended September 30, 2004, one loan in the amount of $2,900,000 was brought current, and one loan in the amount of $1,100,000 is still delinquent and in foreclosure.

                           Loans involving borrowers in bankruptcy as of December 31, 2003 consisted of one loan, which is still in bankruptcy as of September 30, 2004. In addition, another loan with a principal balance of $3,582,000 involves a borrower who entered into bankruptcy during the three months ended September 30, 2004.

                           As of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the Partnership held the following types of mortgages:

September 30,
2004
December 31,
2003

           
        1st Mortgages     $ 244,244,385     260,321,236  
        2nd Mortgages       1,542,359     6,052,970  


        Total     $ 245,786,744   $ 266,374,206  



   
        Income Producing Properties     $ 172,166,132   $ 227,559,987  
        Construction       42,706,530     22,044,472  
        Unimproved Land       29,699,082     14,309,747  
        Residential       1,215,000     2,460,000  


           Total     $ 245,786,744   $ 266,374,206  



                           The Partnership’s total loan portfolio decreased by $20,587,000 (7.9%) since December 31, 2003 primarily due to the payoff of one loan in the amount of $23,500,000 on September 30, 2004.

                           The Partnership’s investment in construction loans increased by $20,662,000 (93.7%) during the nine months ended September 30, 2004. This increase was primarily due to additional construction advances made on existing loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2004.

                           The Partnership’s investment in loans on unimproved land increased by $15,389,000 (107.4%) during the nine months ended September 30, 2004. This increase was primarily the result of the origination of three new loans secured by unimproved land in the total amount of $17,439,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2004, net of two loans in the total amount of $2,050,000 that were paid off during the period. All of the loans secured by unimproved land are first trust deeds.

                           Changes in the allowance for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and the year ended December 31, 2003 were as follows:

2004 2003
Balance, beginning of period     $ 4,100,000   $ 4,774,000  
    Provision       (100,000 )   679,000  
    Recovery of bad debts       100,000     --  
    Charge-off       --     (1,353,000 )


Balance, end of period     $ 4,100,000   $ 4,100,000  



  Real Estate Properties Held for Sale and Investment

                           As of September 30, 2004, the Partnership held title to 12 properties that were foreclosed on or purchased by the Partnership since 1994 in the amount of $47,632,000 (including properties held in four limited liability companies), net of allowance for losses of $743,000 and accumulated depreciation and amortization of $1,132,000. As of September 30, 2004, properties held for sale total $24,632,000 and properties held for investment total $23,000,000. When the Partnership acquires property by foreclosure, it typically earns less income on those properties than could be earned on mortgage loans and may not be able to sell the properties in a timely manner.

                           In February 2004, the Partnership and two co-lenders (the “Sellers”) in a participated loan with a principal balance of $22,200,000 foreclosed due to a violation of the bankruptcy stipulation by the borrower and obtained the underlying collateral, a hotel and casino located in Las Vegas, Nevada. The lenders were allowed to remove their cash collateral at the time of foreclosure, which totaled approximately $733,000 ($458,000 to the Partnership). The hotel and casino were closed at the time of foreclosure. Certain expenses have been incurred on the property since foreclosure for utilities, security, maintenance and legal fees, among other items, in the total amount of approximately $1,904,000 ($1,190,000 to the Partnership). In addition, slot machines within the casino were sold at an auction in July 2004 for approximately $536,000 ($335,000 to the Partnership).

                           On October 1, 2004, the property was sold for net proceeds of $21,182,000 ($13,239,000 to the Partnership) resulting in a loss of approximately $83,000. This loss was recorded as bad debt expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2004.

                           During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, a commercial building located in Albany, Oregon that was acquired by the Partnership through foreclosure in 2002 was sold for $2,033,000, resulting in a gain to the Partnership of approximately $233,000.

                           During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, twelve lots (nine including houses) located in a manufactured home subdivision development located in Ione, California (that was acquired by the Partnership through foreclosure in 1997) were sold for $1,527,000, resulting in a gain to the Partnership of approximately $306,000.

                           During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the Partnership obtained a deed in lieu of foreclosure on a first mortgage loan secured by an assisted living facility located in Monterey, California in the amount of $5,000,000. The Partnership paid certain past due bills of the former borrower at the time of foreclosure of approximately $109,000 all of which were capitalized to the basis of the property.

                           The Partnership is now subject to an existing 2nd deed of trust on the property with the General Partner as the lender, which is recorded as note payable to general partner on the accompanying balance sheet. The principal, accrued interest and other charges on this note of approximately $1,103,000 were capitalized to the basis of the property at the time of foreclosure. Pursuant to an amendment to the note between the Partnership and the general partner dated June 8, 2004, the maturity date on the note was extended to June 8, 2009 and all interest and other accrued charges were deferred until maturity. In addition, the amendment specifies that upon the sale of the property, the General Partner will only be paid the amounts due under the note after the Partnership recovers its basis in the property at the time of sale including any capital improvements made after foreclosure, but excluding the amounts capitalized pursuant to the General Partner note.

                           The Partnership created a new entity, Bayview Gardens, LLC (“Bayview”), which is wholly owned by the Partnership. Under the terms of a lease agreement between the Partnership and Bayview, the assisted living facility is leased to Bayview by the Partnership and the facility is managed by an outside property manager. The net loss to the Partnership from Bayview was $102,000 and $159,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively.

                           Changes in the allowance for real estate losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and the year ended December 31, 2003 were as follows:

2004 2003
Balance, beginning of period     $ 660,000   $ 250,000  
    Provision       83,294     584,532  
    Deductions for real estate sold       --     (174,532 )


Balance, end of period     $ 743,294   $ 660,000  



                           Five of the Partnership’s twelve properties do not currently generate revenue. Expenses from real estate properties have increased from approximately $2,200,000 to $3,184,000 (44.8%) for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2004, respectively, and revenues associated with these properties have increased from $2,153,000 to $2,538,000 (17.9%), respectively.

                           The increase in expenses from real estate properties is due to the acquisition through foreclosure of the assisted living facility located in Monterey, California and the hotel and casino located in Las Vegas, Nevada during 2004. Expenses for these two properties were $492,000 and $1,190,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively. As discussed above, the hotel and casino were sold on October 1, 2004.

                           The increase in rental income is primarily due to a lease termination fee in the amount of $400,000 received from a former tenant of 720 University in April 2004. The tenant vacated the premises but was still obligated to 720 University pursuant to a lease agreement. Since the tenant vacated, 720 University has leased the majority of the vacant space and is now in the process of completing improvements to the space. The increase was also due to $333,000 of revenue earned from the assisted living facility that was obtained through foreclosure during 2004. These increases in rental income were partially offset by the sale of two operating properties during 2003 (a commercial building located in Monterey, California and a hotel property located in Phoenix, Arizona).

  Cash and Cash Equivalents

                           Cash and cash equivalents increased from approximately $6,633,000 as of December 31, 2003 to approximately $34,305,000 as of September 30, 2004 ($27,672,000 or 417.2%) due primarily to loan payoffs in the total amount of $23,500,000 received on September 30, 2004. The majority of these funds were used to fully pay down the line of credit balance on October 1, 2004.

  Interest and Other Receivables

                           Interest and other receivables decreased from approximately $3,759,000 as of December 31, 2003 to $2,497,000 as of September 30, 2004 ($1,262,000 or 33.6%) due primarily to the following:

o the collection of past due amounts on previously delinquent loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2004;

o the receipt of $235,000 in prepaid loan interest in September 2004 due to the payoff of the related loan with a principal balance of $23,500,000 on September 30, 2004;

o the collection of deferred interest on two loans in the amount of $459,000 at the time of payoff during the nine months ended September 30, 2004; and

o the collection of deferred interest and other receivables in the amount of $433,000 in the form of cash collateral within the hotel and casino that was foreclosed in February 2004 (see “Financial Condition – Loan Portfolio” above).

  Due from Affiliate

                           Due from affiliate decreased from approximately $193,000 as of December 31, 2003 to $62,000 ($130,000 or 67.7%) as of September 30, 2004 due to the collection of accrued interest from Dation as a result of lot and house sales during the nine month period.

  Due to General Partner

                           Due to General Partner increased from approximately $1,167,000 as of December 31, 2003 to approximately $1,192,000 as of September 30, 2004 ($25,000 or 2.2%) due to increased management fees owed to the General Partner as of September 30, 2004 pursuant to the Partnership Agreement (see “Results of Operations” above).

  Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities

                           Accounts payable and accrued liabilities increased from approximately $211,000 as of December 31, 2003 to approximately $4,825,000 as of September 30, 2004 ($4,614,000 or 2,187%) due to an overpayment of approximately $4,292,000 received from a borrower of a loan at the time of payoff on September 30, 2004. This amount was reimbursed to the borrower on 10/1/04.

  Note Payable

                           Note payable increased from approximately $8,877,000 as of December 31, 2003 to $9,714,000 ($837,000 or 9.4%) as of September 30, 2004 due to additional advances on the note payable securing the Greeley, Colorado retail complex. The funds were used for additional property and tenant improvements made to the complex.

  Note Payable to General Partner

                           Note payable to general partner increased $1,103,000 since December 31, 2003 as a result of the deed in lieu of foreclosure obtained on a Partnership loan during the nine months ended September 30, 2004. The receipt of the deed in lieu of foreclosure made the Partnership subject to the second deed of trust on the related property payable to Owens Financial Group, Inc., the Partnership’s General Partner. Pursuant to an amendment to the note between the Partnership and the General Partner dated June 8, 2004, the maturity date on the note was extended to June 8, 2009 and all interest and other accrued charges were deferred until maturity. In addition, the amendment specifies that upon the sale of the property, the General Partner will only be paid the amounts due under the note after the Partnership recovers its basis in the property at the time of sale including any capital improvements made after foreclosure, but excluding the amounts capitalized pursuant to the General Partner note.

  Line of Credit Payable

                           Line of credit payable increased from $6,000,000 as of December 31, 2003 to $22,845,000 as of September 30, 2004 ($16,845,000 or 280.8%) as a result of additional advances made on the line of credit to invest in loans secured by trust deeds during the nine months ended September 30, 2004. The line of credit was fully repaid on October 1, 2004 due to a $23,500,000 loan payoff received on September 30, 2004.

Asset Quality

                           There is no precise method of predicting specific losses or amounts that ultimately may be charged off on specific loans or on segments of the loan portfolio. The conclusion that a Partnership loan may become uncollectible, in whole or in part, is a matter of judgment. Although lenders such as banks and savings and loans are subject to regulations that require them to perform ongoing analyses of their loan portfolios (including analyses of loan to value ratios, reserves, etc.), and to obtain current information regarding its borrowers and the securing properties, the Partnership is not subject to these regulations and has not adopted these practices. Rather, management of the General Partner, in connection with the quarterly closing of the accounting records of the Partnership and the preparation of the financial statements, evaluates the Partnership’s mortgage loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses based on the General Partner’s evaluation of the risk inherent in the Partnership’s loan portfolio and current economic conditions. Such evaluation, which includes a review of all loans on which full collectibility may not be reasonably assured, considers among other matters:

o prevailing economic conditions;

o the Partnership’s historical loss experience;

o the types and dollar amounts of loans in the portfolio;

o borrowers’ financial condition and adverse situations that may affect the borrowers’ ability to pay;

o evaluation of industry trends;

o review and evaluation of loans identified as having loss potential; and

o estimated net realizable value or fair value of the underlying collateral.

                           Based upon this evaluation, a determination is made as to whether the allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover potential losses of the Partnership. Additions to the allowance for loan losses are made by charges to the provision for loan losses. Loan losses deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses. Recoveries of previously charged off amounts are credited to the allowance for loan losses.

                           During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the Partnership collected $100,000 from a former borrower of a defaulted loan pursuant to a guarantee agreement.

                           As of September 30, 2004, management believes that the allowance for loan losses of $4,100,000 and the allowance for real estate losses in the amount of $743,000 are adequate.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

                           Sales of Units to investors, portfolio loan payoffs, and advances on the Partnership’s line of credit provide the capital for new mortgage investments. If general market interest rates were to rise substantially, investors might turn to interest-yielding investments other than Partnership Units, which would reduce the liquidity of the Partnership and its ability to make additional mortgage investments to take advantage of the generally higher interest rates. In contrast, a significant increase in the dollar amount of loan payoffs and additional limited partner investments without the origination of new loans of the same amount would increase the liquidity of the Partnership. This increase in liquidity could result in a decrease in the yield paid to limited partners as the Partnership would be required to invest the additional funds in lower yielding, short term investments. With the exception of the reinvestment of distributions, the Partnership has been closed to most new limited partner investments since September 2001, because there have not been enough suitable mortgage investments to allow the Partnership to remain fully invested in loans for a sustainable period of time.

                           Withdrawal percentages have been 7.99%, 6.64%, 5.45%, 3.32%, 4.42% and 4.71% (annualized) for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003, and the nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively. These percentages are the annual average of the limited partners’ capital withdrawals in each calendar quarter divided by the total limited partner capital as of the end of each quarter.

                           The limited partners may withdraw, or partially withdraw, from the Partnership and obtain the return of their outstanding capital accounts at $1.00 per Unit within 61 to 91 days after written notices are delivered to the General Partner, subject to the following limitations, among others:

o No withdrawal of Units can be requested or made until at least one year from the date of purchase of those Units, other than Units received under the Partnership’s Reinvested Distribution Plan.

o Any such payments are required to be made only from net proceeds and capital contributions (as defined) during said 91-day period.

o A maximum of $100,000 per partner may be withdrawn during any calendar quarter.

o The General Partner is not required to establish a reserve fund for the purpose of funding such payments.

o No more than 10% of the total outstanding limited partnership interests may be withdrawn during any calendar year except upon a plan of dissolution of the Partnership.

                           The Partnership may incur indebtedness for the purpose of investing in mortgage loans, among other things. The total amount of indebtedness incurred by the Partnership cannot exceed the sum of 50% of the aggregate fair market value of all Partnership loans. The Partnership has executed a line of credit agreement with a bank, which provides interim financing on mortgage loans invested in by the Partnership. The amount of credit available under this line of credit is $40,000,000. The balance outstanding on the line of credit was $22,845,000 as of September 30, 2004. The Partnership also has a note payable with a bank through its investment in 720 University, LLC with a balance of $9,714,000 as of September 30, 2004.

Contingency Reserves

                           The Partnership maintains cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities as contingency reserves in an aggregate amount of 2% of the limited partners’ capital accounts to cover expenses in excess of revenues or other unforeseen obligations of the Partnership. Although the General Partner believes that contingency reserves are adequate, it could become necessary for the Partnership to sell or otherwise liquidate certain of its investments to cover such contingencies on terms which might not be favorable to the Partnership.

Current Economic Conditions

                           The Partnership’s primary business, making loans secured by real estate, is particularly vulnerable to changes in macroeconomic conditions. Any significant decline in economic activity, particularly in the geographical markets in which the loans are concentrated, could result in a decline in the demand for real estate acquisition and development loans. Declines in economic activity are often accompanied by a decline in prevailing interest rates. Although the Partnership’s lending rates are not directly tied to the Federal Reserve Board’s discount rate, a sustained and widespread decline in interest rates will impact the interest rates the Partnership is able to obtain on loans. Since the Partnership’s loans generally do not have prepayment penalties, declining interest rates may also cause borrowers to prepay their loans and the Partnership may not be able to reinvest the amounts prepaid in loans generating a comparable yield. Moreover, any significant decline in economic activity could adversely impact the ability of borrowers to complete their projects and obtain take out financing. This in turn could increase the level of defaults the Partnership may experience.

                           Economic developments in the United States have generally been favorable in 2004 and this has led to expansion and notable gains in employment. The strengthening demand has been a factor contributing to the rise in inflation this year. These and other factors led the Federal Reserve Board to increase the discount rate by a total of 0.75% in 2004. The rates that the Partnership charges on its loans have not yet been impacted by these actions. In fact, the weighted average interest rate on Partnership loans declined from 11.2% as of September 30, 2003 to 11.0% as of September 30, 2004. At the present time, the General Partner does not expect a noticeable increase in the rates charged on Partnership loans.

                           With the exception of the reinvestment of distributions, the Partnership has been closed to most new limited partner investments since September 2001. The Partnership has remained closed during this time because there have not been enough suitable mortgage investments for the Partnership to invest in to allow the Partnership to remain fully invested in loans for a sustainable period of time. Remaining closed to most new limited partner investments reduces the Partnership’s excess cash that would be invested in lower yielding investments, which could have the effect of decreasing the yield paid to existing limited partners.








  Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

                           The following table contains information about the Partnership’s interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities as of September 30, 2004. The presentation for each category aggregates the assets and liabilities by their maturity dates for maturities occurring in each of the years 2005 through 2009 and aggregates the information for all maturities arising after 2009. The carrying values of the assets and liabilities approximate their fair values as of September 30, 2004.

Interest Earning Assets and Interest Bearing Liabilities,
Aggregated by Maturity Date
Twelve Months Ended September 30,

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Thereafter Total
Interest earning                                
assets:    
Money market    
  accounts     $ 33,542,130     --     --     --     --     --   $ 33,542,130  
Average interest rate       1.0%   --     --     --     --     --     1.0%
Loans secured by    
  trust deeds     $ 135,272,024   $ 58,992,627   $ 14,537,923   $ 3,789,852   $ 5,458,845   $ 27,735,473   $ 245,786,744  
Average interest rate       11.6%   10.6%   10.5%   8.1%   9.5%   10.3%   11.0%

   
Interest bearing    
liabilities:    
Note payable to bank       --   $ 115,600   $ 9,598,142     --     --     --   $ 9,713,742  
Average interest rate       --     4.5%     4.5%   --     --     --     4.5%
Note payable to    
  general partner       --     --     --     --   $ 1,102,895     --   $ 1,102,895  
Average interest rate       --     --     --     --     12.0%   --     12.0%
Line of credit    
  payable     $ 22,845,000   --     --     --     --     --   $ 22,845,000  
Average interest rate       4.8%     --     --   --     --     --     4.8%

  Market Risk

                           Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in interest rates, equity prices and real estate values. The Partnership does not have any assets or liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. The Partnership does not hedge or otherwise seek to manage interest rate risk. The Partnership does not enter into risk sensitive instruments for trading purposes.

                           The majority of the Partnership’s mortgage loans (86.2% as of September 30, 2004) earn interest at fixed rates. All of the mortgage loans are held for investment purposes and are held until maturity. None of the mortgage loans have prepayment penalties. Changes in interest rates may affect the value of the Partnership’s investment in mortgage loans and the rates at which the Partnership reinvests funds obtained from loan repayments and new capital contributions from limited partners. As interest rates increase, although the interest rates the Partnership obtains from reinvested funds will generally increase, the value of the Partnership’s existing loans at fixed rates will generally tend to decrease. As interest rates decrease, the amounts becoming available to the Partnership for investment due to repayment of Partnership loans may be invested at lower rates than the Partnership had been able to obtain in prior investments, or than the rates on the repaid loans.

                           The Partnership’s note payable bears interest at a variable rate, tied to the LIBOR rate of interest. The Partnership’s line of credit payable bears interest at a variable rate, tied to the bank discount rate. As a result, the Partnership’s primary market risk exposure is to changes in interest rates, which will affect the interest cost of outstanding amounts on the note and line of credit payable.







  Item 4. Controls and Procedures


                           Within the 90 days prior to the date of this report, the General Partner of the Partnership carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the General Partner’s management, including the General Partner’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner concluded that the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There were no significant changes in the Partnership’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.








  PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

  Item 1. Legal Proceedings

  The Partnership is not presently involved in any material legal proceedings.

  Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

  None

  Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) Exhibits

3 Sixth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership, incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Form S-11 Registration Statement No. 333-69272 filed April 16, 2004 and declared effective on April 28, 2004.

3.1 Certificate of Limited Partnership – Form LP-1: Filed July 1, 1984*

3.2 Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership – Form LP-2: Filed March 20, 1987*

3.3 Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership – Form LP-2: Filed August 29, 1989*

3.4 Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership – Form LP-2: Filed October 22, 1992*

3.5 Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership – Form LP-2: Filed January 24, 1994*

3.6 Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership – Form LP-2: Filed December 30, 1994*

4.1 Sixth Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Form S-11 Registration Statement No. 333-69272 filed April 16, 2004 and declared effective on April 28, 2004.

4.2 Subscription Agreement and Power of Attorney, incorporated by reference to Exhibit B to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Form S-11 Registration Statement No. 333-69272 filed April 16, 2004 and declared effective on April 28, 2004.

31.1 Section 302 Certification of William C. Owens

31.2 Section 302 Certification of Bryan H. Draper

32 Certifications Pursuant to U.S.C. 18 Section 1350

  *Previously filed under Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement No. 333-69272 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(b) A report on Form 8-K was filed by the Partnership on October 6, 2004. This Form 8-K reported the entry into two material definitive agreements by the Partnership on October 1, 2004.








SIGNATURES

                           Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Dated:   November 12, 2004 OWENS MORTGAGE INVESTMENT FUND,
a California Limited Partnership

By:   Owens Financial Group, Inc., General Partner


Dated:   November 12, 2004


By:   /s/ William C. Owens
         William C. Owens, President


Dated:   November 12, 2004


By:   /s/ Bryan H. Draper
         Bryan H. Draper, Chief Financial Officer


Dated:   November 12, 2004


By:   /s/ Melina A. Platt
         Melina A. Platt, Controller