UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
/X/ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004
-------------------------------------------------
OR
/ / TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
---------------------- -----------------------
Commission File Number 1-9887
--------------------
OREGON STEEL MILLS, INC.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 94-0506370
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
1000 S.W. Broadway, Suite 2200, Portland, Oregon 97205
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(503) 223-9228
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since
last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
--- ---
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes X No
--- ---
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value 26,543,338
---------------------------- ------------------------------------
Class Number of Shares Outstanding
(as of April 30, 2004)
OREGON STEEL MILLS, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION...............................................2
Item 1. Financial Statements................................2
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)........................................5
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations..............14
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about
Market Risk......................................18
Item 4. Controls and Procedures............................18
PART II OTHER INFORMATION....................................................19
Item 1. Legal Proceedings..................................19
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders............................................19
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K...................19
SIGNATURES.....................................................20
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
OREGON STEEL MILLS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
2004 2003
---------------- ---------------
ASSETS (UNAUDITED)
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 6,498 $ 5,770
Trade accounts receivable, less
allowance for doubtful
accounts of $4,757 and $3,665 84,991 78,026
Inventories 135,449 139,623
Deferred income taxes 7,662 19,545
Other 10,557 15,596
--------- ---------
Total current assets 245,157 258,560
--------- ---------
Property, plant and equipment:
Land and improvements 33,409 33,337
Buildings 59,333 54,144
Machinery and equipment 835,755 817,053
Construction in progress 12,016 13,654
--------- ---------
940,513 918,188
Accumulated depreciation (453,555) (440,607)
--------- ---------
Net property, plant and equipment 486,958 477,581
--------- ---------
Goodwill 520 520
Intangibles, net 11,694 11,803
Other assets 11,721 15,514
--------- ---------
TOTAL ASSETS $ 756,050 $ 763,978
========= =========
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt $ 2,000 $ --
Accounts payable 64,311 83,310
Accrued expenses 45,724 48,523
--------- ---------
Total current liabilities 112,035 131,833
Long-term debt 309,440 301,832
Deferred employee benefits 50,243 49,887
Labor dispute settlement 34,844 27,844
Environmental liability 27,642 28,317
Deferred income taxes 8,312 20,442
Other long-term liabilities 241 --
--------- ---------
Total liabilities 542,757 560,155
--------- ---------
Minority interests 18,458 16,571
--------- ---------
Contingencies (Note 9)
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share;
1,000 shares authorized; none issued -- --
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; 45,000
shares authorized, 26,489 and 26,398 shares
issued and outstanding 265 264
Additional paid-in capital 228,063 227,703
Accumulated deficit (18,815) (26,339)
Accumulated other comprehensive income:
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment (3,775) (3,473)
Minimum pension liability (10,903) (10,903)
--------- ---------
Total stockholders' equity 194,835 187,252
--------- ---------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 756,050 $ 763,978
========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
-2-
OREGON STEEL MILLS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
(UNAUDITED)
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
----------------------------
2004 2003
----------- ----------
Sales:
Product Sales $ 241,811 $ 166,930
Freight 10,585 8,751
--------- ---------
252,396 175,681
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales 214,600 169,602
Labor dispute settlement adjustment (Note 9) 7,000 --
Selling, general and administrative expenses 12,330 12,489
Gain on sale of assets (263) (61)
Incentive compensation 3,626 222
--------- ---------
237,293 182,252
--------- ---------
Operating income (loss) 15,103 (6,571)
Other income (expense):
Interest expense, net (8,529) (8,101)
Minority interests 355 258
Other income 597 169
--------- ---------
Income (loss) before income taxes 7,526 (14,245)
Income tax (expense) benefit (2) 5,220
--------- ---------
Net income (loss) $ 7,524 $ (9,025)
========= =========
Basic income (loss) per share $ 0.28 $ (0.34)
Diluted income (loss) per share $ 0.28 $ (0.34)
Weighted average common shares and
common share equivalents outstanding:
Basic 26,489 26,388
Diluted 26,661 26,388
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
-3-
OREGON STEEL MILLS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
----------------------------
2004 2003
------------ ------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 7,524 $ (9,025)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided (used)
by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization 9,791 10,464
Labor dispute settlement adjustment (Note 9) 7,000 --
Deferred income taxes, net (133) (5,081)
Gain on sale of assets (263) (61)
Minority interests (355) (258)
Other, net 516 (780)
Changes in current assets and liabilities:
Trade accounts receivable (6,451) 11,303
Inventories 4,174 (672)
Operating liabilities (23,212) (9,617)
Income taxes 34 (215)
Other, net 6,054 2,747
--------- ---------
NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES 4,679 (1,195)
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to property, plant and equipment (4,335) (6,606)
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment 339 60
Other, net (40) 32
--------- ---------
NET CASH USED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES (4,036) (6,514)
--------- ---------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from bank debt 174,597 --
Payments on bank and long term debt (174,597) --
Issuance of common stock 247 --
--------- ---------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES 247 --
--------- ---------
Effects of foreign currency exchange rate (162) 1,936
--------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 728 (5,773)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period 5,770 33,050
--------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period $ 6,498 $ 27,277
========= =========
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid for:
-------------
Interest $ 15,262 $ 15,460
Income taxes $ 95 $ 165
Non-cash activities:
-------------------
See Note 10 for a description of non-cash consolidation of Oregon Feralloy Partners
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
-4-
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
---------------------
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Oregon Steel
Mills, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("Company"), which include wholly-owned Camrose
Pipe Corporation ("CPC"), which does business as Columbia Structural Tubing and
which, through ownership in another corporation, holds a 60 percent interest in
Camrose Pipe Company ("Camrose"); a 60 percent interest in Oregon Feralloy
Partners ("OFP"); and 87 percent owned New CF&I, Inc. ("New CF&I") which owns a
95.2 percent interest in CF&I Steel, L.P. ("CF&I"). The Company also directly
owns an additional 4.3 percent interest in CF&I. In January 1998, CF&I assumed
the trade name Rocky Mountain Steel Mills ("RMSM"). New CF&I owns a 100 percent
interest in the Colorado and Wyoming Railway Company, which is a short-line
railroad servicing RMSM. All significant inter-company balances and transactions
have been eliminated.
The unaudited financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of
normal recurring accruals and other charges as described in Note 9,
"Contingencies - CF&I Labor Dispute Settlement - Accounting", which in the
opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the interim
periods. Results for an interim period are not necessarily indicative of results
for a full year. Reference should be made to the Company's 2003 Annual Report on
Form 10-K for additional disclosures including a summary of significant
accounting policies.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
FIN 46 (revised December 2003), "CONSOLIDATION OF VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES, AN
INTERPRETATION OF ARB NO. 51," ("FIN 46R") which requires a variable interest
entity to be consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a majority
of the risk of loss from the variable interest entity's activities or entitled
to receive a majority of the entity's residual returns or both. FIN 46R also
requires disclosures about variable interest entities that a company is not
required to consolidate but in which it has a significant variable interest. FIN
46R applied immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31,
2003 and to existing variable interest entities in the periods ending after
March 15, 2004. The Company adopted FIN 46R on January 1, 2004. The financial
statement impact was to increase current assets by $1.7 million, increase net
property, plant and equipment by $15 million, decrease other assets by $3.5
million, increase current liabilities by $3.4 million, increase long-term debt
by $7.5 million (consisting of bank debt) and increase minority interest by $2.3
million. See Note 10, "Joint Venture and Adoption of FIN 46R - Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities" for additional disclosures.
In December 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 132 (revised), "Employer's
Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits." SFAS No. 132
(revised) prescribes employers' disclosures about pension plans and other
postretirement benefit plans; it does not change the measurement or recognition
of those plans. SFAS No. 132 (revised) retains and revises the disclosure
requirement contained in the original SFAS No. 132. It also requires additional
disclosures about the assets, obligations, cash flows, and net periodic benefit
cost of defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans.
SFAS No. 132 (revised) generally is effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2003. The Company discloses the requirements of SFAS No. 132
(revised) in Note 8, "Employee Benefit Plans."
RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods to conform to
the current year presentation. Such reclassifications do not affect results of
operations as previously reported.
2. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
------------------------
The Company has two stock-based compensation plans to make awards of
options to officers, key employees and non-employee directors. The Company
accounts for its plans under the recognition and measurement principles of APB
Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and related
interpretations. No stock-based compensation cost is reflected in net income, as
all options granted under these plans had exercise prices equal to the market
value of the underlying common stock at the date of grant. Options have a term
of ten years and generally vest over one to three years from the date of the
grant.
-5-
The following tables illustrate the effect on net income and earnings per
share as if the Black-Scholes fair value method described in SFAS No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," as amended, had been applied to the
Company's stock option plans.
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
----------------------------
2004 2003
-------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER
SHARE AMOUNTS)
Net income (loss), as reported $ 7,524 $ (9,025)
Deduct: total stock-based compensation
expense determined under fair value
based method for all awards, net of
related tax effects (28) (43)
--------- ---------
Pro forma net income (loss) $ 7,496 $ (9,068)
========= =========
Income (loss) per share:
Basic - as reported $0.28 $(0.34)
Basic - pro forma $0.28 $(0.34)
Diluted - as reported $0.28 $(0.34)
Diluted - pro forma $0.28 $(0.34)
The fair value of options granted was estimated on the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
2003 2002
---- ----
Annualized Dividend Yield 0% 0%
Common Stock Price Volatility 73.8% 64.4%
Risk-Free rate of Return 3.5% 4.9%
Expected option term (in years) 7 7
3. INVENTORIES
-----------
Inventories are stated at the lower of manufacturing cost or market value
with manufacturing cost determined under the average cost method. The components
of inventories are as follows:
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
2004 2003
----------- ------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
Raw materials $ 16,094 $ 5,214
Semi-finished product 45,705 55,864
Finished product 45,051 49,478
Stores and operating supplies 28,599 29,067
-------- --------
Total inventory $135,449 $139,623
======== ========
4. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
---------------------------
THREE MONTHS ENDED
March 31,
---------------------------
2004 2003
-------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
Net income (loss) $ 7,524 $(9,025)
Foreign currency translation
adjustment (162) 1,936
------- -------
Comprehensive income (loss) $ 7,362 $(7,089)
======= =======
-6-
5. DEBT, FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS, AND LIQUIDITY
-------------------------------------------
Debt balances were as follows:
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
2004 2003
----------- ----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
10% First Mortgage Notes due 2009 $ 305,000 $ 305,000
Less unamortized discount on 10% Notes (3,060) (3,168)
Oregon Feralloy Partners Term Loan 9,500 --
--------- ---------
Total debt outstanding 311,440 301,832
Less current portion of Oregon Feralloy
Partners Term Loan (2,000) --
--------- ---------
Non-current maturity of long-term debt $ 309,440 $ 301,832
========= =========
On July 15, 2002, the Company issued $305 million of 10% First Mortgage
Notes due 2009 ("10% Notes") at a discount of 98.772% and an interest rate of
10%. Interest is payable on January 15 and July 15 of each year. The 10% Notes
are secured by a lien on substantially all of the property, plant and equipment,
and certain other assets of the Company (exclusive of Camrose Pipe Corporation),
excluding accounts receivable, inventory, and certain other assets. As of March
31, 2004, the Company had outstanding $305 million of principal amount under the
10% Notes. The Indenture under which the Notes were issued contains restrictions
on new indebtedness and various types of disbursements, including dividends,
based on the cumulative amount of the Company's net income, as defined. Under
these restrictions, there was no amount available for cash dividends at March
31, 2004. New CF&I and CF&I (collectively "Guarantors") guarantee the
obligations of the 10% Notes, and those guarantees are secured by a lien on
substantially all of the property, plant and equipment and certain assets of the
Guarantors, excluding accounts receivable, inventory, and certain other assets.
On March 29, 2000, Oregon Feralloy Partners ("OFP") entered into a 7-year
$14 million loan agreement for the purchase of certain processing assets and for
the construction of a processing facility. Amounts outstanding under the loan
agreement bear interest based on the prime rate plus a margin ranging from 1.84%
to 3.00%, and as of March 31, 2004, there was $9.5 million of principal
outstanding of which $2.0 million was classified as current. The loan is secured
by all the assets of OFP. The creditors of OFP have no recourse to the general
credit of the Company. Effective March 31, 2004, the Company included the OFP
loan balance in the consolidated balance sheet as a result of the adoption of
FIN 46R (See Note 10, "Joint Venture and Adoption of FIN 46R - Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities").
As of March 31, 2004, Oregon Steel Mills, Inc., New CF&I, Inc., CF&I Steel,
L.P., and Colorado and Wyoming Railway Company ("Borrowers") maintained a $65
million revolving credit agreement ("Credit Agreement"), which will expire on
June 30, 2005. At March 31, 2004, $5.0 million was restricted under the Credit
Agreement, $15.4 million was restricted under outstanding letters of credit, and
$44.6 million was available for use. Amounts under the Credit Agreement bear
interest based on either (1) the prime rate plus a margin ranging from 0.25% to
1.00%, or (2) the adjusted LIBO rate plus a margin ranging from 2.50% to 3.25%.
Unused commitment fees range from 0.25% to 0.75%. During the quarter, short-term
borrowings ranged from zero to $17 million, at an interest rate of approximately
5%. As of March 31, 2004, there was no outstanding balance due under the Credit
Agreement. Had there been an outstanding balance, the average interest rate for
the Credit Agreement would have been 5.0%. The unused line fees were 0.75%. The
margins and unused commitment fees will be subject to adjustment within the
ranges discussed above based on a quarterly leverage ratio. The Credit Agreement
contains various restrictive covenants including minimum consolidated tangible
net worth amount, a minimum earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization ("EBITDA") amount, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio,
limitations on maximum annual capital and environmental expenditures, a
borrowing availability limitation relating to inventory, limitations on
stockholder dividends and limitations on incurring new or additional debt
obligations other than as allowed by the Credit Agreement. The Company cannot
pay cash dividends without prior approval from the lenders. At March 31, 2004,
the Borrowers were in compliance with the Credit Agreement covenants.
Camrose maintains a CDN $15 million revolving credit facility with a
Canadian bank, the proceeds of which may be used for working capital and general
business purposes of Camrose. The facility is collateralized by substantially
all of the assets of Camrose, and borrowings under this facility are limited to
an amount equal to the sum of the product of specified advance rates and
Camrose's eligible trade accounts receivable and inventories. This facility
expires in September 2005. As of March 31, 2004, the interest rate of this
facility was 4.0%. Annual commitment fees are 0.25% of the unused portion of the
credit line. At March 31, 2004, there was no outstanding balance due under the
credit facility. At March 31, 2004, Camrose was in compliance with the revolving
credit facility covenants.
-7-
As of March 31, 2004, principal payments on debt are due as follows (in
thousands):
2004 $ 2,000
2005 2,000
2006 2,000
2007 3,500
2008 --
2009 305,000
--------
$314,500
========
6. INCOME TAXES
------------
The effective income tax expense rate was less than 1% for the three months
ended March 31, 2004, as compared to a tax benefit rate of 36.6% in the
corresponding period in 2003. The effective income tax rate for the first three
months of 2004 varied from the combined state and federal statutory rate
principally because the Company reversed a portion of the valuation allowance,
established in 2003, for certain federal and state net operating loss
carry-forwards, state tax credits, and alternative minimum tax credits.
SFAS No. 109, "ACCOUNTING FOR INCOME TAXES," requires that tax benefits for
federal and state net operating loss carry-forwards, state tax credits, and
alternative minimum tax credits each be recorded as an asset to the extent that
management assesses the utilization of such assets to be "more likely than not";
otherwise, a valuation allowance is required to be recorded. Based on this
guidance, the Company reduced their valuation allowances by $3.2 million in the
three months ended March 31, 2004 due to less uncertainty regarding the
realization of deferred tax assets.
The Company will continue to evaluate the need for valuation allowances in
the future. Changes in estimated future taxable income and other underlying
factors may lead to adjustments to the valuation allowances.
7. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
---------------------------
The Company calculates earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128,
"Earnings per Share." SFAS No. 128 requires the presentation of "basic" earnings
per share and "diluted" earnings per share. Basic earnings per share is computed
by dividing the net income available to common shareholders by the weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding. For purposes of
calculating diluted earnings per share, the denominator includes both the
weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding and the number of
dilutive common stock equivalents such as stock options, as determined using the
treasury stock method.
Shares used in calculating basic and diluted earnings per share for the
three-month period ended March 31, are as follows:
THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31,
----------------------------------------
2004 2003
-------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
Basic weighted average shares outstanding 26,489 26,388
Dilutive effect of:
Employee stock options 172 --
-------- --------
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
Assuming dilution 26,661 26,388
======== ========
Net income (loss) $ 7,524 $ (9,025)
======== ========
Basic income (loss) per share: $ 0.28 $ (0.34)
Diluted income (loss) per share: $ 0.28 $ (0.34)
-8-
8. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
----------------------
The Company has noncontributory defined benefit retirement plans, certain
health care and life insurance benefits, an Employee Stock Ownership Plan, and
qualified Thrift (401(k)) plans covering all of its eligible domestic employees.
Components of net periodic benefit cost for the quarter related to the
defined benefit and certain health care and life insurance benefit plans were:
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
----------------------------
2004 2003
--------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS)
Service cost $ 1,169 $ 1,329
Interest cost 2,152 2,090
Expected return on plan assets (1,748) (1,547)
Recognized net loss 420 419
Recognized prior service cost 31 45
Amortization of transition asset 49 49
------- -------
Total net periodic benefit cost
for the quarter $ 2,073 $ 2,385
======= =======
9. CONTINGENCIES
-------------
ENVIRONMENTAL
All material environmental remediation liabilities for non-capital
expenditures, which are probable and estimable, are recorded in the financial
statements based on current technologies and current environmental standards at
the time of evaluation. Adjustments are made when additional information is
available that suggests different remediation methods or periods may be required
and affect the total cost. The best estimate of the probable cost within a range
is recorded; however, if there is no best estimate, the low end of the range is
recorded and the range is disclosed.
OREGON STEEL DIVISION
In May 2000, the Company entered into a Voluntary Clean-up Agreement with
the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality ("DEQ") committing the Company to
conduct an investigation of whether, and to what extent, past or present
operations at the Company's Portland Mill may have affected sediment quality in
the Willamette River. Based on preliminary findings, the Company is conducting a
full remedial investigation ("RI"), including areas of investigation throughout
the Portland Mill, and has committed to implement source control if required.
The Company's best estimate for costs of the RI study will approximate $853,000
over the next two years. Based on this estimate, the Company has accrued a
liability of $853,000 as of March 31, 2004. The Company has also recorded a
$853,000 receivable for insurance proceeds that are expected to cover these RI
costs because the Company's insurer is defending this matter, subject to a
standard reservation of rights, and is paying these RI costs as incurred. Based
upon the results of the RI, the DEQ may require the Company to incur costs
associated with additional phases of investigation, remedial action or
implementation of source controls, which could have a material adverse effect on
the Company's results of operations because it may cause costs to exceed
available insurance or because insurance may not cover those particular costs.
The Company is unable at this time to determine if the likelihood of an
unfavorable outcome or loss is either probable or remote, or to estimate a
dollar amount range for a potential loss.
In a related manner, in December 2000, the Company received a general
notice letter from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"), identifying
it, along with 68 other entities, as a potentially responsible party ("PRP")
under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
("CERCLA") with respect to contamination in a portion of the Willamette River
that has been designated as the "Portland Harbor Superfund Site." The letter
advised the Company that it may be liable for costs of remedial investigation
and remedial action at the Portland Harbor Superfund Site (which liability,
under CERCLA, is joint and several with other PRPs) as well as for natural
resource damages that may be associated with any releases of contaminants
(principally at the Portland Mill site) for which the Company has liability. At
this time, nine private and public entities have signed an Administrative Order
of Consent ("AOC") to perform a remedial investigation/feasibility study
("RI/FS") of the Portland Harbor Superfund Site under EPA oversight. The RI/FS
is expected to take four to five years to complete. The Company is a member of
the Lower Willamette Group, which is funding that investigation, and it signed a
Coordination and Cooperation Agreement with the EPA that binds it to all terms
of the AOC. The Company's cost associated with the RI/FS as of March 31, 2004 is
approximately $441,000, all of which has been covered by the Company's insurer.
As a best estimate of the RI/FS costs for the years subsequent to March 31,
2004, the Company has accrued a liability of $740,000 as of March 31, 2004. The
Company has also recorded a $740,000 receivable for insurance proceeds that are
expected to cover these RI/FS costs because
-9-
the Company's insurer is defending this matter, subject to a standard
reservation of rights, and is paying these RI/FS costs as incurred. Although the
EPA has not yet defined the boundaries of the Portland Harbor Superfund Site,
the AOC requires the RI/FS to focus on an "initial study area" that does not now
include the portion of the Willamette River adjacent to the Portland Mill. The
study area, however, may be expanded. At the conclusion of the RI/FS, the EPA
will issue a Record of Decision setting forth any remedial action that it
requires to be implemented by identified PRPs. In June 2003, the Company signed
a Funding and Participating Agreement whereby it, with nine other industrial and
municipal parties, agreed to fund a joint effort with federal, state and tribal
trustees to study potential natural resource damages in the Portland Harbor. The
Company estimates its financial commitment in connection with this agreement to
be approximately $591,000 for the years subsequent to March 31, 2004. Based on
this estimate, the Company has accrued a liability of $591,000 as of March 31,
2004. The Company has also recorded a $591,000 receivable for insurance proceeds
that are expected to cover these RI/FS costs because the Company's insurer is
defending this matter, subject to a standard reservation of rights, and is
paying these costs as incurred. This effort is expected to last until 2006. A
determination that the Company is a PRP could cause the Company to incur costs
associated with remedial action, natural resource damage and natural resource
restoration, the costs of which may exceed available insurance or which may not
be covered by insurance, which therefore could have a material adverse effect on
the Company's results of operations. The Company is unable to estimate a dollar
amount range for any related remedial action that may be implemented by the EPA,
or natural resource damages and restoration that may be sought by federal, state
and tribal natural resource trustees.
RMSM DIVISION
In connection with the acquisition of the steelmaking and finishing
facilities located at Pueblo, Colorado ("Pueblo Mill"), CF&I accrued a liability
of $36.7 million for environmental remediation related to the prior owner's
operations. CF&I believed this amount was the best estimate of costs from a
range of $23.1 million to $43.6 million. CF&I's estimate of this liability was
based on two remediation investigations conducted by environmental engineering
consultants, and included costs for the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
facility investigation, a corrective measures study, remedial action, and
operation and maintenance associated with the proposed remedial actions. In
October 1995, CF&I and the CDPHE finalized a postclosure permit for hazardous
waste units at the Pueblo Mill. As part of the postclosure permit requirements,
CF&I must conduct a corrective action program for the 82 solid waste management
units at the facility and continue to address projects on a prioritized
corrective action schedule which substantially reflects a straight-line rate of
expenditure over 30 years. The State of Colorado mandated that the schedule for
corrective action could be accelerated if new data indicated a greater threat
existed to the environment than was presently believed to exist. At March 31,
2004, the accrued liability was $27.5 million, of which $24.2 million was
classified as non-current on the consolidated balance sheet.
The CDPHE inspected the Pueblo Mill in 1999 for possible environmental
violations, and in the fourth quarter of 1999 issued a Compliance Advisory
indicating that air quality regulations had been violated, which was followed by
the filing of a judicial enforcement action ("Action") in the second quarter of
2000. In March 2002, CF&I and CDPHE reached a settlement of the Action, which
was approved by the court (the "State Consent Decree"). The State Consent Decree
provided for CF&I to pay $300,000 in penalties, fund $1.5 million of community
projects, and to pay approximately $400,000 for consulting services. CF&I is
also required to make certain capital improvements expected to cost
approximately $25 million, including converting to the new single New Source
Performance Standards Subpart AAa ("NSPS AAa") compliant furnace discussed
below. The State Consent Decree provides that the two existing furnaces will be
permanently shut down approximately 16 months after the issuance of a Prevention
of Significant Deterioration ("PSD") air permit. CF&I applied for the PSD permit
in April 2002 and the draft permit was issued for public comment on October 2,
2003.
In May 2000, the EPA issued a final determination that one of the two
electric arc furnaces at the Pueblo Mill was subject to federal NSPS AA. This
determination was contrary to an earlier "grandfather" determination first made
in 1996 by CDPHE. CF&I appealed the EPA determination in the federal Tenth
Circuit Court of Appeals. The issue has been resolved by entry of a Consent
Decree on November 26, 2003, and the Tenth Circuit dismissed the appeal on
December 10, 2003. In that Consent Decree and overlapping with the commitments
made to the CDPHE described above, CF&I committed to the conversion to the new
NSPS AAa compliant furnace (demonstrating full compliance 21 months after permit
approval and expected to cost, with all related emission control improvements,
approximately $25 million), and to pay approximately $450,000 in penalties and
fund certain supplemental environmental projects valued at approximately $1.1
million, including the installation of certain pollution control equipment at
the Pueblo Mill. The above mentioned expenditures for supplemental environmental
projects will be both capital and non-capital expenditures.
In response to the CDPHE settlement and the resolution of the EPA action,
CF&I expensed $2.8 million in 2001 for possible fines and non-capital related
expenditures. As of March 31, 2004, the remaining accrued liability was
approximately $539,000.
In December 2001, the State of Colorado issued a Title V air emission
permit to CF&I under the CAA requiring that the furnace subject to the EPA
action operate in compliance with NSPS AA standards. The Title V permit has been
modified several times and gives CF&I adequate time (at least 15 1/2 months
after CDPHE issues the PSD permit) to convert to a single NSPS AAa compliant
furnace. Any decrease in steelmaking production during the furnace conversion
period when both furnaces are expected to be shut down will be offset by
increasing production prior to the conversion period by building up
semi-finished steel inventory
-10-
and to a much lesser degree, if necessary, purchasing semi-finished steel
("billets") for conversion into rod products at spot market prices. Pricing and
availability of billets is subject to significant volatility.
In a related matter, in April 2000, the Union filed suit in U.S. District
Court in Denver, Colorado, asserting that the Company and CF&I had violated the
CAA at the Pueblo Mill for a period extending over five years. The Union sought
declaratory judgement regarding the applicability of certain emission standards,
injunctive relief, civil penalties and attorney's fees. On July 6, 2001, the
presiding judge dismissed the suit. The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals on March
3, 2003 reversed the District Court's dismissal of the case and remanded the
case for further hearing to the District Court. The parties to the
above-referenced litigation have negotiated what purports to be an agreement to
settle the labor dispute and all associated litigation, including that
referenced above. See "Labor Matters" for a description of the settlement. If,
for any reason, that settlement is not finalized, the Company does not believe
the suit will have a material adverse effect on its results of operations;
however, the result of litigation such as this is difficult to predict and an
adverse outcome with significant penalties is possible.
LABOR MATTERS
CF&I LABOR DISPUTE AND RESULTANT LITIGATION
The labor contract at CF&I expired on September 30, 1997. After a brief
contract extension intended to help facilitate a possible agreement, on October
3, 1997, the Union initiated a strike at CF&I for approximately 1,000 bargaining
unit employees. The parties, however, failed to reach final agreement on a new
labor contract due to differences on economic issues. As a result of contingency
planning, CF&I was able to avoid complete suspension of operations at the Pueblo
Mill by utilizing a combination of new hires, striking employees who returned to
work, contractors and salaried employees.
On December 30, 1997, the Union called off the strike and made an
unconditional offer on behalf of its members to return to work. At the time of
this offer, because CF&I had permanently replaced the striking employees, only a
few vacancies existed at the Pueblo Mill. Since that time, vacancies have
occurred and have been filled by formerly striking employees ("Unreinstated
Employees"). As of March 31, 2004, approximately 824 Unreinstated Employees have
either returned to work or have declined CF&I's offer of equivalent work. At
March 31, 2004, approximately 126 Unreinstated Employees remain unreinstated.
On February 27, 1998, the Regional Director of the National Labor Relations
Board ("NLRB") Denver office issued a complaint against CF&I, alleging
violations of several provisions of the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA").
On August 17, 1998, a hearing on these allegations commenced before an
Administrative Law Judge ("Judge"). Testimony and other evidence were presented
at various sessions in the latter part of 1998 and early 1999, concluding on
February 25, 1999. On May 17, 2000, the Judge rendered a decision which, among
other things, found CF&I liable for certain unfair labor practices and ordered
as remedy the reinstatement of all 1,000 Unreinstated Employees, effective as of
December 30, 1997, with back pay and benefits, plus interest, less interim
earnings. Since January 1998, the Company has been returning unreinstated
strikers to jobs, as positions became open. As noted above, there were
approximately 126 Unreinstated Employees as of March 31, 2004. On August 2,
2000, CF&I filed an appeal with the NLRB in Washington, D.C. A separate hearing
concluded in February 2000, with the judge for that hearing rendering a decision
on August 7, 2000, that certain of the Union's actions undertaken since the
beginning of the strike did constitute misconduct and violations of certain
provisions of the NLRA. The Union has appealed this determination to the NLRB.
In both cases, the non-prevailing party in the NLRB's decision will be entitled
to appeal to the appropriate U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. CF&I believes both
the facts and the law fully support its position that the strike was economic in
nature and that it was not obligated to displace the properly hired replacement
employees.
In the event there is an adverse determination on these issues,
Unreinstated Employees could be entitled to back pay, including benefits, plus
interest, from the date of the Union's unconditional offer to return to work
through the date of their reinstatement or a date deemed appropriate by the NLRB
or an appellate court. The number of Unreinstated Employees entitled to back pay
may be limited to the number of past and present replacement workers; however,
the Union might assert that all Unreinstated Employees should be entitled to
back pay. Back pay is generally determined by the quarterly earnings of those
working less interim wages earned elsewhere by the Unreinstated Employees. In
addition to other considerations, each Unreinstated Employee has a duty to take
reasonable steps to mitigate the liability for back pay by seeking employment
elsewhere that has comparable working conditions and compensation. Any estimate
of the potential liability for back pay will depend significantly on the ability
to assess the amount of interim wages earned by these employees since the
beginning of the strike, as noted above. Due to the lack of accurate information
on interim earnings for both reinstated and Unreinstated Employees and sentiment
of the Union towards the Company, it is not currently possible to obtain the
necessary data to calculate possible back pay. In addition, the NLRB's findings
of misconduct by the Union may mitigate any back pay award with respect to any
Unreinstated Employees proven to have taken part or participated in acts of
misconduct during and after the strike.
CF&I LABOR DISPUTE SETTLEMENT
On January 15, 2004 the Company announced a tentative agreement to settle
the labor dispute between the Union and CF&I ("Settlement"). The Settlement is
conditioned on, among other things, (1) its approval by shareholders of New
CF&I, (2) ratification of a new collective bargaining agreement being executed
between CF&I and the Union, (3) approval of the Settlement
-11-
by the NLRB and the dismissal of cases pending before the NLRB related to the
labor dispute and (4) various pending legal actions between the Company, New
CF&I and CF&I and the Union being dismissed. The Settlement if approved will
provide remedies for all outstanding unfair labor practices between CF&I and the
Union and sets the stage for the ratification of a new five-year collective
bargaining agreement. The Settlement includes the creation of a labor dispute
settlement trust ("Trust") that will hold assets to be contributed by either the
Company or CF&I. Assets of the Trust will include: (1) four million shares of
the Company's common stock, (2) a cash contribution of $2,500 for each
beneficiary of the trust, estimated to be in total $2.5 million, and (3) a ten
year profit participation obligation consisting of 25% of CF&I operating income,
as defined, not to exceed $3 million per year for years one through five and $4
million per year for years six through ten. The beneficiaries of the Trust are
those individuals who (1) as of October 3, 1997 were employees of CF&I and
represented by the Union, (2) as of December 31, 1997 had not separated, as
defined, from CF&I and (3) are entitled to an allocation as defined in the
Trust. The Settlement, certain elements of which will be effected through the
new five-year collective bargaining agreement, also includes: (1) early
retirement with immediate enhanced pension benefit where CF&I will offer
bargaining unit employees an early retirement opportunity based on seniority
until a maximum of 200 employees have accepted the offer, the benefit will
include immediate and unreduced pension benefits for all years of service
(including the period of the labor dispute) and for each year of service prior
to March 3, 1993 (including service with predecessor companies) an additional
monthly pension of $10, (2) pension credit for the period of the labor dispute
whereby CF&I employees who went on strike will be given pension credit for both
eligibility and pension benefit determination purposes for the period beginning
October 3, 1997 and ending on the latest of said employees actual return to
work, termination of employment, retirement or death, (3) pension credit for
service with predecessor companies whereby for retirements after January 1,
2004, effective January 2, 2006 for each year of service prior to March 3, 1978
(including service with predecessor companies), CF&I will provide an additional
monthly benefit to employees of $12.50, and for retirements after January 1,
2006, effective January 2, 2008 for each year of service between March 3, 1978
and March 3, 1993 (including service with predecessor companies), CF&I will
provide an additional monthly benefit of $12.50, and (4) individuals who are
members of the bargaining units as of October 3, 1997 will be immediately
eligible to apply for and receive qualified long-term disability ("LTD")
benefits on a go forward basis, notwithstanding the date of the injury or
illness, service requirements or any filing deadlines. The Settlement also
includes the Company's agreement to nominate a director designated by the Union
on its Board of Directors, and to a broad based neutrality clause for certain of
the Company's facilities in the future.
On March 12, 2004, the Union membership at CF&I voted to accept the
proposed Settlement and a new five-year collective bargaining agreement. The
Settlement is still conditioned on the approval of the Settlement by the NLRB
and the dismissal of cases pending before the NLRB related to the labor dispute,
and the dismissal of various pending legal actions between the Company, New CF&I
and CF&I and the Union.
CF&I LABOR DISPUTE SETTLEMENT - ACCOUNTING
The Company recorded charges of $31.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2003
and $7 million in the first quarter of 2004 related to the Settlement, the final
amount of which is dependant upon the price of the Company's common stock on the
effective date of the Settlement. As of March 31, 2004, the liability accrued
for these charges totals $38.1 million, with $34.8 million classified as
long-term on the consolidated balance sheet. The charge in the first quarter of
2004 is a result of adjusting the previously recorded value at December 31, 2003
of the four million shares of Company common stock ($23.3 million at $5.81 per
share) to market at March 31, 2004. The closing price of the Company's common
stock on the New York Stock Exchange at March 31, 2004 was $7.56 per share,
resulting in an additional labor dispute settlement charge of $7 million for the
first quarter of 2004. The Company will continue to adjust the common stock
charge portion of the Settlement at the end of each quarter either up or down
for the change in the price of the Company's common stock through the effective
date of the Settlement. The accrual for the LTD benefits ($5.3 million at March
31, 2004) may also change, as better claims information becomes available. As
employees accept the early retirement benefits, the Company expects to record an
additional charge during 2004 estimated at approximately $7.0 million related to
these benefits. The enhancements to pension and post-retirement medical benefits
for non-early retirees will be accounted for prospectively on the date at which
plan amendments occur pursuant to the new five-year collective bargaining
agreement in accordance with SFAS No. 87 and SFAS No. 106.
PURCHASE COMMITMENTS
Effective January 8, 1990, the Company entered into an agreement, which was
subsequently amended on December 7, 1990 and again on April 3, 1991, to purchase
a base amount of oxygen produced from a facility located at the Company's
Portland Mill. The oxygen facility is owned and operated by an independent third
party. The agreement expires in August 2011 and specifies that the Company will
pay a base monthly charge that is adjusted annually based upon a percentage
change in the Producer Price Index. The monthly base charge at March 31, 2004
was approximately $129,000. A similar contract to purchase oxygen for the Pueblo
Mill was entered into on February 2, 1993 by CF&I, and was subsequently amended
on August 4, 1994. The agreement specifies that CF&I will pay a base monthly
charge that is adjusted annually based upon a percentage change in the Producer
Price Index. The monthly base charge at March 31, 2004 was $119,000.
The Company has entered into an agreement, which expires in May 2005, for
the purchase of electricity used at the Portland Mill from an independent third
party. This commitment specifies that the Company will pay a minimum monthly
charge that fluctuates seasonally and which averages $50,000 per month.
-12-
OTHER CONTINGENCIES
The Company is party to various other claims, disputes, legal actions and
other proceedings involving contracts, employment and various other matters. In
the opinion of management, the outcome of these matters would not have a
material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of the Company,
its results of operations, and liquidity.
10. JOINT VENTURE AND ADOPTION OF FIN 46R - CONSOLIDATION OF VARIABLE INTEREST
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTITIES
--------
In June 1999, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and Feralloy Oregon
Corporation ("Feralloy") formed Oregon Feralloy Partners to construct a temper
mill and a cut-to-length ("CTL") facility ("Facility") with an annual stated
capacity of 300,000 tons to process CTL plate from steel coil produced at the
Company's plate mill in Portland, Oregon. The Facility commenced operations in
May 2001. The Company has a 60% profit/loss interest and Feralloy, the managing
partner, has a 40% profit/loss interest in OFP. Each partner holds 50% voting
rights as owners of OFP. The Company is not required to, nor does it currently
anticipate it will, make other contributions of capital to fund operations of
OFP. However, the Company is obligated to supply a quantity of steel coil for
processing through the Facility of not less than 15,000 tons per month. In the
event that the three-month rolling average of steel coil actually supplied for
processing is less than 15,000 tons and OFP operates at less than breakeven (as
defined in the Joint Venture Agreement), then the Company is required to make a
payment to OFP at the end of the three month period equal to the shortfall.
During the first quarter of 2004, the Company did not supply the minimum steel
required to OFP and OFP did not operate at breakeven. Consequently, during the
first quarter of 2004, the Company expensed and recorded an obligation to OFP of
approximately $220,000.
The Company adopted FIN 46R "CONSOLIDATION OF VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES"
on January 1, 2004, for its OFP operation. The cumulative impact of the adoption
of this accounting standard on retained earnings was zero. OFP primarily owns
land improvements, a building, equipment and other operating assets, all of
which is collateral for the $9.5 million bank debt of OFP. The creditors of OFP
have no recourse to the general credit of the Company. The Financial Statement
impact was to increase current assets by $1.7 million, increase net property,
plant and equipment by $15 million, decrease other assets by $3.5 million,
increase current liabilities by $3.4 million, increase long-term debt by $7.5
million (consisting of bank debt) and increase minority interest by $2.3
million.
-13-
Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
GENERAL
- -------
The following information contains forward-looking statements, which are
subject to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. Statements made in this report that are not statements of
historical fact are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements made
in this report can be identified by forward-looking words such as, but not
limited to, "expect," "anticipate," "believe," "intend," "plan," "seek,"
"estimate," "continue," "may," "will," "would," "could," and similar
expressions. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and
uncertainties and actual results could differ materially from those projected.
These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, general business
and economic conditions; competitive products and pricing, as well as
fluctuations in demand; the supply of imported steel and subsidies provided by
foreign governments to support steel companies domiciled in their countries;
changes in U.S. or foreign trade policies affecting steel imports or exports;
potential equipment malfunction; work stoppages; plant construction and repair
delays; reduction in electricity supplies and the related increased costs and
possible interruptions of supply; changes in the availability and costs of raw
materials and supplies used by the Company; costs of environmental compliance
and the impact of governmental regulations; risks related to the outcome of the
pending Union dispute; and failure of the Company to predict the impact of lost
revenues associated with interruption of the Company's, its customers' or
suppliers' operations.
OVERVIEW
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company
and its subsidiaries, which include wholly- owned Camrose Pipe Corporation,
which does business as Columbia Structural Tubing and through ownership in
another corporation holds a 60 percent interest in Camrose; a 60 percent
interest in OFP; and 87 percent owned New CF&I, which owns a 95.2 percent
interest in CF&I. The Company also directly owns an additional 4.3 percent
interest in CF&I. In January 1998, CF&I assumed the trade name Rocky Mountain
Steel Mills. New CF&I owns a 100 percent interest in the Colorado and Wyoming
Railway Company. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have
been eliminated.
The Company currently has two aggregated operating divisions known as the
Oregon Steel Division and the RMSM Division. The Oregon Steel Division is
centered at the steel plate mill in Portland, Oregon ("Portland Mill"), which
supplies steel for the Company's steel plate, structural tubing, and large
diameter pipe finishing facilities. The Oregon Steel Division's steel pipe mill
in Napa, California is a large diameter steel pipe mill and fabrication
facility. The Oregon Steel Division also produces large diameter pipe and
electric resistance welded pipe at Camrose. In October 2003, the Oregon Steel
Division began production of structural tube at its Columbia Structural Tubing
facility. The RMSM Division consists of the steelmaking and finishing facilities
of the Pueblo Mill, as well as certain related operations.
In May 2003, the Company shut down its Portland Mill melt shop. The
determination to close the melt shop was based on 1) the Company's ability to
obtain semi-finished slab through purchases from suppliers on the open market,
and 2) high energy and raw material costs and the yield losses associated with
the inefficient casting technology in use at the Portland Mill. The Company
forecasts that future semi-finished slab purchases for the Portland Mill,
combined with existing inventory on hand, will meet the production needs of the
Portland Mill finishing operation for the remainder of 2004 and into the
foreseeable future. The Company intends to maintain the melt shop in operating
condition. In addition, CF&I determined in the second quarter of 2003 that the
new single furnace operation (as referenced in Note 9, "Contingencies - RMSM
Division") will not have the capacity to support a two caster operation and
therefore CF&I has determined that one caster and other related assets have no
future service potential. The Company recorded a pre-tax charge to earnings of
approximately $36 million in the second quarter of 2003 related to these asset
impairments.
On January 15, 2004 the Company announced a tentative agreement to settle
the labor dispute between the Union and CF&I. The Company recorded a charge of
$31.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2003 and an additional charge of $7
million in the first quarter of 2004 related to the tentative settlement. See
Note 9 - "Contingencies - CF&I Labor Dispute Settlement - Accounting" for a
discussion of the accounting for the tentative agreement.
On December 4, 2003, President Bush lifted the tariffs on imports of steel
that were imposed March 5, 2002. The tariffs were designed to give the U.S.
Steel Industry time to restructure and become competitive in the global steel
market. During the time that the tariffs were in effect, the Company believes
that the tariffs did not materially impact either the supply of, or the cost of,
steel slabs purchased by the Company on the open market for processing into
steel plate and coil. Since the lifting of the tariffs, the steel industry has
seen a dramatic increase in both the cost of raw materials and the selling price
of most steel products. The Company believes that current market conditions are
the result of the combination of a strong steel demand in Asia, a weak United
States dollar, and an increase in ocean freight costs. The Company anticipates
that market conditions will remain unsettled into the foreseeable future. During
this period of time, the Company believes that it will continue to incur
increased costs for steel scrap, slabs, and ocean freight, and achieve increased
selling prices to offset these higher costs.
-14-
2004 OUTLOOK
For 2004, the Company expects to ship approximately 1,750,000 tons of
products and generate approximately $1 billion in sales. In the Oregon Steel
Division the product mix is expected to consist of 630,000 tons of plate and
coil, 200,000 tons of welded pipe and 60,000 tons of structural tubing. At these
shipment levels, the Company expects its Portland combination mill to run at
approximately 80 percent of its rated capacity and its welded pipe mills to run
at approximately 30 percent of their rated capacities. The Company's RMSM
Division expects to ship approximately 380,000 tons and 482,000 tons of rail and
rod and bar products, respectively. At these shipment levels, the rail and rod
mills would be at 90 percent and 100 percent, respectively, of their rated
capacities. Seamless pipe shipments will be dependent on market conditions in
the drilling industry. At the present time the seamless mill is not operating.
Based on performance to date, the Company anticipates that for the second
quarter of 2004 it will have record quarterly sales. Exclusive of any further
labor dispute settlement adjustments relating to the future changes in the
market value of the Company's common stock price, the Company anticipates that
quarterly operating income and net income will be the highest in the Company's
history in the second quarter of 2004. Because of the uncertainty related to
third and fourth quarter sales price and the volatility of the slab and scrap
market, the Company does not currently believe the third and fourth quarter
financial performance will be equal to the results anticipated for the second
quarter; however, the Company believes the results for the third quarter of 2004
will exceed that of the first quarter of 2004. For fiscal 2004 the Company
currently anticipates that it will have record sales, operating income and net
income.
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF INCOME
(In thousands except tons, per ton, and percentages)
During the first quarter of 2004, shipments at 476,500 tons, were at an all
time high and up 19 percent from the first quarter of 2003. Sales were $252.4
million for the first quarter of 2004, the highest level since 1998 and the
second highest in the Company's history.
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
--------------------------------------------------------
2004 2003 CHANGE % CHANGE
-------- -------- -------- ----------
Product Sales
Oregon Steel Division $138,821 $ 78,342 $ 60,479 77.2%
RMSM Division $102,990 $ 88,588 $ 14,402 16.3%
-------- -------- -------- -----
Consolidated $241,811 $166,930 $ 74,881 44.9%
======== ======== ======== =====
Tons shipped
Oregon Steel Division:
Plate and Coil 173,800 108,700 65,100 59.9%
Welded Pipe 58,800 51,100 7,700 15.1%
Structural Tube 10,400 -- 10,400 100.0%
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total Oregon Steel Division 243,000 159,800 83,200 52.1%
-------- -------- -------- --------
RMSM Division:
Rail 100,700 113,000 (12,300) (10.9)%
Rod and Bar 130,000 115,500 14,500 12.6%
Seamless Pipe 2,800 10,900 (8,100) (74.3)%
-------- -------- -------- ---------
Total RMSM Division 233,500 239,400 (5,900) (2.4)%
-------- -------- ------- ---------
Consolidated 476,500 399,200 77,300 19.4%
======== ======== ======= =========
Product Sales price per ton
Oregon Steel Division $ 571 $ 490 $ 81 16.5%
RMSM Division $ 441 $ 370 $ 71 19.2%
Consolidated $ 507 $ 418 $ 89 21.3%
SALES. The increase in consolidated tonnage shipments are primarily due to
increased shipments of plate, coil, welded pipe, structural tubing and rod
products partially offset by lower rail and seamless pipe shipments. The
increase in product sales and average product sales price were primarily due to
higher average selling prices for plate, coil, rail and rod and bar products and
the increased shipments noted above, partially offset by lower average selling
prices for welded and seamless pipe. Increased shipments and selling prices are
the result of a combination of factors including strong steel demand in Asia, a
weak United States dollar and increased ocean freight costs, all of which makes
the United States market less attractive to foreign producers.
-15-
GROSS PROFIT
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
------------------------------------------------
2004 2003 CHANGE % CHANGE
------- ------ ------- --------
Gross Profit $37,796 $6,079 $31,717 521.8%
The increase in gross profit was primarily a result of the increased
volume and higher average sales prices discussed above, partially offset by
higher slab and scrap costs and the inability of the Company to fully recover
its cost of raw material for rail and large diameter pipe products.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
------------------------------------------------
2004 2003 CHANGE % CHANGE
------- ------- ------ --------
Selling, General and Administrative $12,330 $12,489 $(159) (1.3)%
The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses for the first
quarter of 2004 was primarily the result of both decreased costs for information
technology support and equipment and lower depreciation expense of certain
information technology assets, partially offset by increased costs related to
the handling and loading of products for sale due to an increase in the volume
of tons shipped in the first quarter of 2004, and by an increase in bad debt
expense.
INTEREST EXPENSE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
------------------------------------------------
2004 2003 CHANGE % CHANGE
------ ------ ------ --------
Interest Expense $8,529 $8,101 $428 5.3%
The increase in interest expense was due to short-term borrowings under
the Credit Agreement during the first quarter of 2004 versus no borrowings in
the first quarter of 2003 and the addition of OFP interest expense in the first
quarter of 2004 due to the adoption of FIN 46R. (See Note 10, "Joint Venture
and Adoption of FIN 46R - Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.")
financial statements).
INCOME TAXES
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
-----------------------------------------------
2004 2003 CHANGE % CHANGE
---- ------ -------- --------
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit $(2) $5,220 $(5,222) (100.0)%
The effective income tax benefit rate was less than 1% for the first
quarter of 2004, compared to the tax expense rate of 36.6% in the first quarter
of 2003. The effective income tax rate for 2004 varied from the combined state
and federal statutory rate principally because the Company reversed a portion of
the valuation allowance, established in 2003, for certain federal and state net
operating loss carry-forwards, state tax credits, and alternative minimum tax
credits. SFAS No. 109, "ACCOUNTING FOR INCOME TAXES," requires that tax benefits
for federal and state net operating loss carry-forwards, state tax credits, and
alternative minimum tax credits each be recorded as an asset to the extent that
management assesses the utilization of such assets to be "more likely than not";
otherwise, a valuation allowance is required to be recorded. Based on this
guidance, the Company reduced their valuation allowance by $3.2 million in the
first quarter of 2004 due to less uncertainty regarding the realization of these
deferred tax assets. The Company will continue to evaluate the need for
valuation allowances in the future. Changes in estimated future taxable income
and other underlying factors may lead to adjustments to the valuation
allowances.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At March 31, 2004, the Company's liquidity, comprised of cash, cash
equivalents, and funds available under its $65 million revolving credit
agreement ("Credit Agreement") totaled approximately $51.1 million, compared to
$49.7 million at December 31, 2003.
-16-
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At March 31, 2004, the Company's liquidity, comprised of cash, cash
equivalents, and funds available under its $65 million revolving credit
agreement ("Credit Agreement") totaled approximately $51.1 million, compared to
$49.7 million at December 31, 2003.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $4.7 million for the first
three months of 2004 compared to $1.2 million used in operations in the same
period of 2003. The items primarily affecting the $5.9 million increase in cash
flows were operating income, before consideration of non-cash transactions, and
changes in net working capital requirements of $22.9 million.
Net cash used by investing activities in the first quarter of 2004 totaled
$4.0 million compared to $6.5 million in the same period of 2003. The decrease
was in part due to a $2.3 million decrease in additions to property, plant and
equipment. During the first quarter of 2004, the Company expended approximately
$3.0 million and $1.2 million on capital projects (excluding capitalized
interest) at the Oregon Steel Division and the RMSM Division, respectively.
Net working capital at March 31, 2004 increased $6.4 million compared to
December 31, 2003, reflecting a $13.4 million decrease in current assets and a
$19.8 million decrease in current liabilities. The decrease in current assets
was primarily due to a decrease in inventories, deferred tax asset, and other
assets of $4.2 million, $11.9 million, and $5.0 million, respectively, offset by
a $7.0 million increase in accounts receivable. The increase in accounts
receivable was primarily attributable to increased sales and sales prices for
plate and coil, and rod and bar products. The decrease in current liabilities
was due primarily to a decrease in trade accounts payable of $12.2 million due
to payments for slabs, a decrease of $4.8 million in deferred revenue due to
delivery of products, and a decrease in accrued interest of $7.8 million due to
the timing of an interest payment on the 10% Notes, partially offset by an
increase in accrued incentive compensation of $3.6 million and a $2.0 million
increase in the current portion of the OFP debt.
On July 15, 2002, the Company issued $305 million of 10% First Mortgage
Notes due 2009 ("10% Notes") at a discount of 98.772% and an interest rate of
10%. Interest is payable on January 15 and July 15 of each year. The 10% Notes
are secured by a lien on substantially all of the property, plant and equipment
and certain other assets of the Company (exclusive of Camrose Pipe Corporation),
excluding accounts receivable, inventory, and certain other assets. As of March
31, 2004, the Company had outstanding $305 million of principal amount under the
10% Notes. The Indenture under which the Notes were issued contains restrictions
on new indebtedness and various types of disbursements, including dividends,
based on the cumulative amount of the Company's net income, as defined. Under
these restrictions, there was no amount available for cash dividends at March
31, 2004. New CF&I and CF&I (collectively "Guarantors") guarantee the
obligations of the 10% Notes, and those guarantees are secured by a lien on
substantially all of the property, plant and equipment and certain assets of the
Company and the Guarantors, excluding accounts receivable, inventory, and
certain other assets.
On March 29, 2000, Oregon Feralloy Partners ("OFP") entered into a 7-year
$14 million loan agreement for the purchase of certain processing assets and for
the construction of a processing facility. Amounts under the loan agreement bear
interest based on the prime rate plus a margin ranging from 1.84% to 3.00%, and
as of March 31, 2004, there was $9.5 million of principal outstanding. The loan
is secured by all the assets of OFP. The creditors of OFP have no recourse to
the general credit of the Company. Effective March 31, 2004, the Company
included the OFP loan balance in the consolidated balance sheet as a result of
the adoption of FIN 46R (See Note 10, "Joint Venture and Adoption of FIN 46R -
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities").
As of March 31, 2004, Oregon Steel Mills, Inc., New CF&I, Inc., CF&I
Steel, L.P., and Colorado and Wyoming Railway Company ("Borrowers") maintained a
$65 million revolving credit agreement ("Credit Agreement"), which will expire
on June 30, 2005. At March 31, 2004, $5.0 million was restricted under the
Credit Agreement, $15.4 million was restricted under outstanding letters of
credit, and $44.6 million was available for use. Amounts under the Credit
Agreement bear interest based on either (1) the prime rate plus a margin ranging
from 0.25% to 1.00%, or (2) the adjusted LIBO rate plus a margin ranging from
2.50% to 3.25%. Unused commitment fees range from 0.25% to 0.75%. During the
quarter, short-term borrowings ranged from zero to $17 million, at an interest
rate of approximately 5%. As of March 31, 2004, there was no outstanding balance
due under the Credit Agreement. Had there been an outstanding balance, the
average interest rate for the Credit Agreement would have been 5.0%. The unused
line fees were 0.75%. The margins and unused commitment fees will be subject to
adjustment within the ranges discussed above based on a quarterly leverage
ratio. The Credit Agreement contains various restrictive covenants including
minimum consolidated tangible net worth amount, a minimum earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") amount, a minimum
fixed charge coverage ratio, limitations on maximum annual capital and
environmental expenditures, a borrowing availability limitation relating to
inventory, limitations on stockholder dividends and limitations on incurring new
or additional debt obligations other than as allowed by the Credit Agreement.
The Company cannot pay cash dividends without prior approval from the lenders.
At March 31, 2004, the Borrowers were in compliance with the Credit Agreement
covenants.
Camrose maintains a CDN $15 million revolving credit facility with a
Canadian bank, the proceeds of which may be used for working capital and general
business purposes of Camrose. The facility is collateralized by substantially
all of the assets of Camrose, and borrowings under this facility are limited to
an amount equal to the sum of the product of specified advance rates and
Camrose's eligible trade accounts receivable and inventories. This facility
expires in September 2005. As of March 31, 2004, the interest rate of this
facility was 4.0%. Annual commitment fees are 0.25% of the unused portion of the
credit line. At March 31, 2004, there was no outstanding balance due under the
credit facility. At March 31, 2004, Camrose was in compliance with the revolving
credit facility covenants.
-17-
As of March 31, 2004, principal payments on debt are due as follows (in
thousands):
2004 $ 2,000
2005 2,000
2006 2,000
2007 3,500
2008 -
2009 305,000
-------
$314,500
========
Primarily due to the favorable net results for the first three months of
2004, the Company has been able to satisfy its needs for working capital and
capital expenditures through operations and in part through its available cash
on hand. The Company believes that its anticipated needs for working capital and
capital expenditures for the next twelve months will be met from funds generated
from operations, and if necessary, from the available credit facility.
The Company's level of indebtedness presents other risks to investors,
including the possibility that the Company and its subsidiaries may be unable to
generate cash sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on their
indebtedness when due. In that event, the holders of the indebtedness may be
able to declare all indebtedness owing to them to be due and payable
immediately, and to proceed against their collateral, if applicable. These
actions would likely have a material adverse effect on the Company. In addition,
the Company faces potential costs and liabilities associated with environmental
compliance and remediation issues and the labor dispute at the Pueblo Mill. See
Part 1, "Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 9, "Contingencies" of this
quarterly report for a description of those matters. Any costs or liabilities in
excess of those expected by the Company could have a material adverse effect on
the Company.
OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Information on the Company's off balance sheet arrangements is disclosed
in the contractual obligations table of the Company's 2003 Form 10-K.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
No material changes.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of March 31, 2004, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including
the Company's Chief Executive Officer and the Company's Chief Financial Officer,
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
There were no significant changes in the Company's internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect these controls including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
subsequent to the date the Company completed its evaluation.
-18-
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See Part 1, "Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 9, Contingencies"
for a discussion of the status of (a) the environmental issues at the Portland
Mill and RMSM, and (b) the status of the labor dispute at RMSM.
The Company is party to various other claims, disputes, legal actions and
other proceedings involving contracts, employment and various other matters. In
the opinion of management, the outcome of these matters should not have a
material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of the Company.
The Company maintains insurance against various risks, including certain
types of tort liability arising from the sale of its products. The Company does
not maintain insurance against liability arising out of waste disposal, on-site
remediation of environmental contamination or earthquake damage to its Napa Pipe
Mill and related properties because of the high cost of that coverage. There is
no assurance that the insurance coverage carried by the Company will be
available in the future at reasonable rates, if at all.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The Company held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders on April 29, 2004.
The stockholders elected William Kinnune, David Parkinson, and Brett
Wilcox as Class A directors, to serve until May 2007. All Class B and Class C
directors continued in office after the meeting. Kinnune, Parkinson and Wilcox
were elected by a vote of 23,342,257 shares, 23,310,894 shares, and 23,339,237
shares, respectively, and 307,388 shares, 338,751 shares, and 310,408 shares,
respectively, withheld authority to vote.
The stockholders also voted on a proposal, submitted by a stockholder, to
hire a proxy advisory firm. The proposal was defeated with a vote of 11,384,183
shares against, 2,861,576 shares for, 98,732 shares abstaining, and 12,150,681
shares subject to broker non-votes.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) EXHIBITS
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rules
13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission and pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rules
13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission and pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(b) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
On January 16, 2004, the Company filed a report on Form 8-K
announcing a tentative agreement to settle a six-year old labor
dispute between the United Steel Workers of America and the
Company's majority-owned subsidiary Rocky Mountain Steel Mills.
On March 16, 2004, the Company filed a report on Form 8-K in
relation to a press release announcing its financial results for
the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2003, which was
subsequently amended on March 22, 2004 to include the transcript
of the earnings conference call held on March 18, 2004.
-19-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
OREGON STEEL MILLS, INC.
Date: May 6, 2004 /s/ Jeff S. Stewart
------------------------------------
Jeff S. Stewart
Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
-20-
OREGON STEEL MILLS, INC.
EXHIBIT INDEX
LIST OF EXHIBITS FILED WITH FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED MARCH 31, 2004
31.1 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32.1 Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer
-21-