TEXTAINER FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION
650 California Street, 16th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108
August 12, 2003
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we are
submitting herewith for filing on behalf of TCC Equipment Income Fund (the
"Partnership") the Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Second
Quarter ended June 30, 2003.
This filing is being effected by direct transmission to the Commission's EDGAR
System.
Sincerely,
Nadine Forsman
Controller
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003
Commission file number 0-17688
TCC EQUIPMENT INCOME FUND
A California Limited Partnership
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
California 94-3045888
(State or other jurisdiction (IRS Employer
of incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
650 California Street, 16th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (ZIP Code)
(415) 434-0551
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [ ] No [X]
TCC EQUIPMENT INCOME FUND
(a California Limited Partnership)
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter Ended June 30, 2003
Table of Contents
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page
Part I Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)
Balance Sheets - June 30, 2003
and December 31, 2002............................................................................. 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2003 and 2002...................................................................... 4
Statements of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2003 and 2002...................................................................... 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months
ended June 30, 2003 and 2002...................................................................... 6
Notes to Financial Statements..................................................................... 8
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations..................................................................... 14
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.................................... 22
Item 4. Controls and Procedures....................................................................... 22
Part II Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.............................................................. 23
TCC EQUIPMENT INCOME FUND
(a California Limited Partnership)
Balance Sheets
June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002
(Amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003 2002
------------- ------------
Assets
Container rental equipment, net of accumulated
depreciation of $6,042, (2002: $6,154) (note 4) $ 5,287 $ 5,832
Cash 442 513
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $28, (2002: $24) 378 410
Due from affiliates, net (note 2) 58 29
Prepaid expenses 2 17
------------- ------------
$ 6,167 $ 6,801
============= ============
Liabilities and Partners' Capital
Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 117 $ 128
Accrued liabilities 20 27
Accrued recovery costs 18 18
Accrued damage protection plan costs 46 43
Deferred damage protection plan revenue 21 22
------------- ------------
Total liabilities 222 238
------------- ------------
Partners' capital:
General partners - -
Limited partners 5,945 6,563
------------- ------------
Total partners' capital 5,945 6,563
------------- ------------
$ 6,167 $ 6,801
============= ============
See accompanying notes to financial statements
TCC EQUIPMENT INCOME FUND
(a California Limited Partnership)
Statements of Operations
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
(Amounts in thousands except for unit and per unit amounts)
(unaudited)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Three months Three months Six months Six months
Ended Ended Ended Ended
June 30, 2003 June 30, 2002 June 30, 2003 June 30, 2002
--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Rental income $ 417 $ 396 $ 847 $ 800
--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Costs and expenses:
Direct container expenses 122 152 224 279
Bad debt expense (benefit) 10 (5) 8 1
Depreciation (note 4) 169 154 345 310
Write-down of containers (note 4) 4 22 10 77
Professional fees 11 17 20 26
Management fees to affiliates (note 2) 37 33 76 72
General and administrative costs to affiliates (note 2) 19 22 40 45
Other general and administrative costs 5 19 10 37
Loss (gain) on sale of containers (note 4) 30 (17) 38 11
--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
407 397 771 858
--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Income (loss) from operations 10 (1) 76 (58)
--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Interest income 1 2 2 3
--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Net earnings (loss) $ 11 $ 1 $ 78 $ (55)
=============== =============== =============== ===============
Allocation of net earnings (loss) (note 2):
General partners $ 4 $ 5 $ 9 $ 11
Limited partners 7 (4) 69 (66)
--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
$ 11 $ 1 $ 78 $ (55)
=============== =============== =============== ===============
Limited partners' per unit share
of net earnings (loss) $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.05 $ (0.05)
=============== =============== =============== ===============
Limited partners' per unit share
of distributions $ 0.20 $ 0.25 $ 0.48 $ 0.55
=============== =============== =============== ===============
Weighted average number of limited
partnership units outstanding 1,412,199 1,428,963 1,412,199 1,428,963
=============== =============== =============== ===============
See accompanying notes to financial statements
TCC EQUIPMENT INCOME FUND
(a California Limited Partnership)
Statements of Partners' Capital
For the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
(Amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partners' Capital
--------------------------------------------------
General Limited Total
------------- ------------- -------------
Balances at January 1, 2002 $ - $ 8,043 $ 8,043
Distributions (11) (787) (798)
Redemptions (note 5) - (21) (21)
Net earnings (loss) 11 (66) (55)
------------- ------------- -------------
Balances at June 30, 2002 $ - $ 7,169 $ 7,169
============= ============= =============
Balances at January 1, 2003 $ - $ 6,563 $ 6,563
Distributions (9) (672) (681)
Redemptions (note 5) - (15) (15)
Net earnings 9 69 78
------------- ------------- -------------
Balances at June 30, 2003 $ - $ 5,945 $ 5,945
============= ============= =============
See accompanying notes to financial statements
TCC EQUIPMENT INCOME FUND
(a California Limited Partnership)
Statements of Cash Flows
For the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
(Amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003 2002
------------ ------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings (loss) $ 78 $ (55)
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation (note 4) 345 310
Write-down of containers (note 4) 10 77
Increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts 4 1
Loss on sale of containers 38 11
(Increase) decrease in assets:
Accounts receivable 29 74
Due from affiliates, net (56) (28)
Prepaid expenses 15 3
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (18) 5
Accrued recovery costs - (17)
Damage protection plan costs 3 (1)
Deferred damage protection plan revenue (1) (1)
------------ ------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 447 379
------------ ------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sale of containers 178 321
------------ ------------
Net cash provided by investing activities 178 321
------------ ------------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Redemptions of limited partnership units (15) (21)
Distributions to partners (681) (799)
------------ ------------
Net cash used in financing activities (696) (820)
------------ ------------
Net decrease in cash (71) (120)
Cash at beginning of period 513 533
------------ ------------
Cash at end of period $ 442 $ 413
============ ============
See accompanying notes to financial statements
TCC EQUIPMENT INCOME FUND
(a California Limited Partnership)
Statements Of Cash Flows--Continued
For the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
(Amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supplemental Disclosures:
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
The following table summarizes the amounts of distributions to partners and
proceeds from sale of containers which had not been paid or received as of June
30, 2003 and 2002, and December 31, 2002 and 2001, resulting in differences in
amounts recorded and amounts of cash disbursed or received by the Partnership,
as shown in the Statements of Cash Flows for the six-month periods ended June
30, 2003 and 2002.
June 30 Dec. 31 June 30 Dec. 31
2003 2002 2002 2001
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Distributions to partners included in:
Due to affiliates.............................. $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 2
Proceeds from sale of containers included in:
Due from affiliates............................ 32 59 88 110
The following table summarizes the amounts of distributions to partners and
proceeds from sale of containers recorded by the Partnership and the amounts
paid or received as shown in the Statements of Cash Flows for the six-month
periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002.
2003 2002
---- ----
Distributions to partners declared.................................. $681 $798
Distributions to partners paid...................................... 681 799
Proceeds from sale of containers recorded........................... 151 299
Proceeds from sale of containers received........................... 178 321
The Partnership has entered into direct finance leases, resulting in the
transfer of containers from container rental equipment to accounts receivable.
The carrying value of containers transferred during the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2003 and 2002 was $1 and $2, respectively.
See accompanying notes to financial statements
TCC EQUIPMENT INCOME FUND
(a California Limited Partnership)
Notes To Financial Statements
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
(Amounts in thousands except for unit and per unit amounts)
(unaudited)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note 1. General
TCC Equipment Income Fund (the Partnership), a California limited
partnership with a maximum life of 20 years, was formed in 1987. The
Partnership owns a fleet of intermodal marine cargo containers, which are
leased to international shipping lines.
In January 1998, the Partnership ceased purchasing containers and in
October 1998, the Partnership began its liquidation phase. This phase may
last up to six or more years depending on whether the containers are sold
(i) in one or more large transactions or (ii) gradually, either as they
reach the end of their marine useful lives or when an analysis indicates
that their sale is warranted based on existing market conditions and the
container's age, location and condition. The Partnership anticipates that
all excess cash, after redemptions and working capital reserves, will be
distributed to the limited and general partners on a quarterly basis.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern
basis which contemplates the realization of assets and payments of
liabilities in the ordinary course of business. The final termination and
winding up of the Partnership, as well as payment of liquidating and/or
final distributions, will occur at the end of the liquidation phase when
all or substantially all of the Partnership's containers have been sold and
the Partnership begins its dissolution.
The accompanying interim comparative financial statements have not been
audited by an independent public accountant. However, all adjustments
(which were only normal and recurring adjustments) which are, in the
opinion of management, necessary to fairly present the financial position
of the Partnership as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 and the
results of its operations for the three and six-month periods ended June
30, 2003 and 2002 and changes in partners' capital and cash flows for the
six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, have been made.
The financial information presented herein should be read in conjunction
with the audited financial statements and other accompanying notes included
in the Partnership's annual audited financial statements as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2002, in the Annual Report filed on Form 10-K.
Certain estimates and assumptions were made by the Partnership's management
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the
reporting period. The Partnership's management evaluates its estimates on
an on-going basis, including those related to the container rental
equipment, accounts receivable and accruals.
These estimates are based on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the
results of which form the basis for making judgments regarding the carrying
values of assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
The Partnership's management believes the following critical accounting
policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the
preparation of its financial statements.
The Partnership maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated
losses resulting from the inability of its lessees to make required
payments. These allowances are based on management's current assessment of
the financial condition of the Partnership's lessees and their ability to
make their required payments. If the financial condition of the
Partnership's lessees were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of
their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.
The Partnership depreciates its container rental equipment based on certain
estimates related to the container's useful life and salvage value. These
estimates are based upon assumptions about future demand for leased
containers and the estimated sales price at the end of the container's
useful life. The Partnership will evaluate the estimated residual values
and remaining estimated useful lives on an on-going basis and will revise
its estimates as needed. As a result, depreciation expense may fluctuate in
future periods based on fluctuations in these estimates.
Additionally, the recoverability of the recorded amounts of containers to
be held for continued use and identified for sale in the ordinary course of
business are evaluated to ensure that containers held for continued use are
not impaired and that containers identified for sale are recorded at
amounts that do not exceed the estimated fair value of the containers.
Containers to be held for continued use are considered impaired and are
written down to estimated fair value when the estimated future undiscounted
cash flows are less than the recorded values. Containers identified for
sale are written down to estimated fair value when the recorded value
exceeds the estimated fair value. In determining the estimated future
undiscounted cash flows and fair value of containers, assumptions are made
regarding future demand and market conditions for leased containers and the
sales prices for used containers. If actual market conditions are less
favorable than those projected or if actual sales prices are lower than
those estimated by the Partnership, additional write-downs may be required
and/or losses may be realized.
In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146 "Accounting for costs
Associated With Exit or Disposal Activities." SFAS No. 146 addresses
financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or
disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
No. 94-3 "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits
and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a
Restructuring)." This Statement requires that a liability for a cost
associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the
liability is incurred. The Partnership adopted SFAS No. 146 on January 1,
2003 and there was no material impact on the Partnership's financial
condition, operating results or cash flow.
Certain reclassifications, not affecting net earnings (loss), have been
made to prior year amounts in order to conform to the 2003 financial
statement presentation.
Note 2. Transactions with Affiliates
Textainer Financial Services Corporation (TFS) is the managing general
partner of the Partnership and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Textainer
Capital Corporation (TCC). Textainer Equipment Management Limited (TEM) and
Textainer Limited (TL) are associate general partners of the Partnership.
The managing general partner and the associate general partners are
collectively referred to as the General Partners and are commonly owned by
Textainer Group Holdings Limited (TGH). The General Partners also act in
this capacity for other limited partnerships. The General Partners manage
and control the affairs of the Partnership.
In accordance with the Partnership Agreement, sections 3.08 through 3.11,
net earnings or losses and distributions are generally allocated 1% to the
General Partners and 99% to the Limited Partners. Effective October 1998,
the allocation of distributions to the General Partners was increased to
1.3% in accordance with section 2.05 of the Partnership Agreement. In
addition, if the allocation of distributions exceeds the allocation of net
earnings (loss) and creates a deficit in the General Partners' aggregate
capital account, the Partnership Agreement provides for a special
allocation of gross income equal to the amount of the deficit to be made to
the General Partners.
As part of the operation of the Partnership, the Partnership is to pay to
the General Partners an equipment management fee, an incentive management
fee and an equipment liquidation fee. These fees are for various services
provided in connection with the administration and management of the
Partnership. The Partnership incurred $8 and $17 of incentive management
fees during the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003,
respectively, and $6 and $16 during the comparable periods in 2002,
respectively. There were no equipment liquidation fees incurred during the
six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002.
The Partnership's containers are managed by TEM. In its role as manager,
TEM has authority to acquire, hold, manage, lease, sell and dispose of the
Partnership's containers. TEM holds, for the payment of direct operating
expenses, a reserve of cash that has been collected from leasing
operations; such cash is included in due from affiliates, net at June 30,
2003 and December 31, 2002.
Subject to certain reductions, TEM receives a monthly equipment management
fee equal to 7% of gross revenues attributable to operating leases and 2%
of gross revenues attributable to full payout net leases. These fees
totaled $29 and $59 for the three and six-month periods ended June 30,
2003, respectively, and $27 and $56, respectively, for the comparable
periods in 2002.
Certain indirect general and administrative costs such as salaries,
employee benefits, taxes and insurance are incurred in performing
administrative services necessary to the operation of the Partnership.
These costs are incurred and paid by TEM and TFS. Total general and
administrative costs allocated to the Partnership during the three and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 were as follows:
Three months Six months
ended June 30, ended June 30,
-------------- --------------
2003 2002 2003 2002
---- ---- ---- ----
Salaries $11 $14 $22 $29
Other 8 8 18 16
-- -- -- --
Total general and
administrative costs $19 $22 $40 $45
== == == ==
TEM allocates these general and administrative costs based on the ratio of
the Partnership's interest in the managed containers to the total container
fleet managed by TEM during the period. TFS allocates these costs based on
the ratio of the Partnership's investors to the total number of investors
of all limited partnerships managed by TFS or equally among all the limited
partnerships managed by TFS. The General Partners allocated the following
general and administrative costs to the Partnership during the three and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002:
Three months Six months
ended June 30, ended June 30,
-------------- --------------
2003 2002 2003 2002
---- ---- ---- ----
TEM $17 $19 $35 $38
TFS 2 3 5 7
-- -- -- --
Total general and
administrative costs $19 $22 $40 $45
== == == ==
At June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, due from affiliates, net is
comprised of:
2003 2002
---- ----
Due from affiliates:
Due from TEM....................... $70 $39
-- --
Due to affiliates:
Due to TCC......................... 4 3
Due to TFS......................... 8 7
-- --
12 10
-- --
Due from affiliates, net $58 $29
== ==
These amounts receivable from and payable to affiliates were incurred in
the ordinary course of business between the Partnership and its affiliates
and represent timing differences in the accrual and remittance of expenses,
fees and distributions described above and in the accrual and remittance of
net rental revenues and container sales proceeds from TEM.
Note 3. Lease Rental Income
Leasing income arises principally from the renting of containers to various
international shipping lines. Revenue is recorded when earned according to
the terms of the container rental contracts. These contracts are typically
for terms of five years or less. The following is the lease mix of the
on-lease containers (in units) at June 30, 2003 and 2002:
2003 2002
---- ----
On-lease under master leases 1,935 2,012
On-lease under long-term leases 1,139 898
----- -----
Total on-lease containers 3,074 2,910
===== =====
Under master lease agreements, the lessee is not committed to lease a
minimum number of containers from the Partnership during the lease term and
may generally return any portion or all the containers to the Partnership
at any time, subject to certain restrictions in the lease agreement. Under
long-term lease agreements, containers are usually leased from the
Partnership for periods of between three to five years. Such leases are
generally cancelable with a penalty at the end of each twelve-month period.
Under direct finance leases, the containers are usually leased from the
Partnership for the remainder of the container's useful life with a
purchase option at the end of the lease term.
The remaining containers are off-lease and are located primarily at a large
number of storage depots. At June 30, 2003 and 2002, the Partnership's
off-lease containers were in the following locations:
2003 2002
---- ----
Americas 298 446
Europe 129 235
Asia 109 453
Other 25 26
--- -----
Total off-lease containers 561 1,160
=== =====
At June 30, 2003 approximately 12% of the Partnership's off-lease
containers had been specifically identified as for sale.
Note 4. Container Rental Equipment
Effective July 1, 2002, the Partnership revised its estimate for container
salvage value from a percentage of equipment cost to an estimated dollar
residual value. The effect of this change for the three and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2003 was an increase to depreciation expense of $22
and $51, respectively. The Partnership will evaluate the estimated residual
values and remaining estimated useful lives on an on-going basis and will
revise its estimates as needed. As a result, depreciation expense may
fluctuate in future periods based on fluctuations in these estimates.
The Partnership stopped purchasing containers in 1998, but its leasing
activities are affected by fluctuations in new container prices. New
container prices steadily declined from 1995 through 1999 and have remained
low through the first half of 2003. As a result, the cost of new containers
purchased in recent years is significantly less than the average cost of
containers purchased in prior years. The Partnership evaluated the
recoverability of the recorded amount of container rental equipment at June
30, 2003 and 2002 for containers to be held for continued use and
determined that a reduction to the carrying value of these containers was
not required. The Partnership also evaluated the recoverability of the
recorded amount of containers identified for sale in the ordinary course of
business and determined that a reduction to the carrying value of these
containers was required. The Partnership wrote down the value of these
containers to their estimated net realizable value, which was based on
recent sales prices less cost to sell. During the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2003 and 2002, the Partnership recorded write-down expenses of $10
and $77, respectively, on 32 and 162 containers identified as for sale and
requiring a reserve. During the three-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and
2002, the Partnership recorded write-down expenses of $4 and $24,
respectively, on 19 and 55 containers identified for sale and requiring a
reserve. At June 30, 2003 and 2002, the net book value of the 41 and 168
containers identified for sale was $31 and $146, respectively.
The Partnership sold 35 previously written down containers for no gain
during the six-month period ended June 30, 2003 and sold 160 previously
written down containers for a loss of $16 during the same period in 2002.
During the three-month period ended June 30, 2003 the Partnership sold 21
previously written down containers for a loss of $1 and sold 87 previously
written down containers for a loss of $11 during the same period in 2002.
The Partnership incurred losses on the sale of some containers previously
written down as the actual sales prices received on these containers were
lower than the estimates used for the write-downs.
The Partnership also sold containers that had not been written down and
recorded a loss of $38 and a gain of $5 during the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2003, and 2002, respectively. During the three-month periods ended
June 30, 2003 and 2002, the Partnership recorded a loss of $29 and a gain
of $28, respectively, on the sale of containers that had not been written
down.
As more containers are subsequently identified as for sale or if container
sales prices continue to decline, the Partnership may incur additional
write-downs on containers and/or may incur losses on the sale of
containers. The Partnership will continue to evaluate the recoverability of
the recorded amounts of container rental equipment.
Note 5. Redemptions
The following redemptions were consummated by the Partnership during the
six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002:
Units Average
Redeemed Redemption Price Amount Paid
-------- ---------------- -----------
Total Partnership redemptions as of
December 31, 2001....................... 40,966 $6.36 $260
Six-month period ended
June 30, 2002........................... 4,625 $4.64 21
------ ---
Total Partnership redemptions as of
June 30, 2002........................... 45,591 $6.16 $281
====== ===
Total Partnership redemptions as
of December 31, 2002.................... 58,115 $5.68 $330
Six-month period ended
June 30, 2003........................... 4,240 $3.54 15
------ ---
Total Partnership redemptions as of
June 30, 2003........................... 62,355 $5.53 $345
====== ===
The redemption price is fixed by formula in accordance with the Partnership
Agreement.
ITEM 2 - MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in thousands except for unit and per unit amounts)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Financial Statements contain information which will assist in evaluating the
financial condition of the Partnership for the three and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2003, and 2002. Please refer to the Financial Statements and Notes
thereto in connection with the following discussion.
Textainer Financial Services Corporation (TFS) is the Managing General Partner
of the Partnership and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Textainer Capital
Corporation (TCC). Textainer Equipment Management Limited (TEM) and Textainer
Limited (TL) are Associate General Partners of the Partnership. The General
Partners manage and control the affairs of the Partnership.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
From October 1987 until October 1989, the Partnership offered limited
partnership interests to the public. The Partnership received its minimum
subscription amount of $1,000 on April 8, 1988, and on October 26, 1989, the
Partnership's offering of limited partnership interests was closed at $29,491.
In October 1998, the Partnership entered its liquidation phase, which may last
up to six or more years depending on whether the containers are sold (i) in one
or more large transactions or (ii) gradually, either as they reach the end of
their useful marine lives or when an analysis indicates that their sale is
warranted based on existing market conditions and the container's age, location
and condition. To date, the Partnership has sold containers only gradually,
rather than in large transactions. The Partnership anticipates that all excess
cash, after redemptions and working capital reserves, will be distributed to the
general and limited partners on a quarterly basis. These distributions will
consist of cash from operations and/or cash from sales proceeds. As the
Partnership's container fleet decreases, cash from operations is expected to
decrease, while cash from sales proceeds is expected to fluctuate based on the
number of containers sold and the actual sales price per container received.
Consequently, the Partnership anticipates that a large portion of all future
distributions will be a return of capital.
The final termination and winding up of the Partnership, as well as payment of
liquidating and/or final distributions, will occur at the end of the liquidation
phase when all or substantially all of the Partnership's containers have been
sold and the Partnership begins its dissolution.
The Partnership invests working capital and cash flow from operating and
investing activities prior to its distribution to the partners in short-term,
liquid investments. Rental income and proceeds from container sales are the
Partnership's principal sources of liquidity and the source of funds for
distributions. Rental income and container sales prices are affected by market
conditions for leased and used containers. Market conditions are discussed more
fully in "Results of Operations." The Partnership's cash is affected by cash
provided by or used in operating, investing and financing activities. These
activities are discussed in detail below.
During the six-month period ended June 30, 2003, the Partnership declared cash
distributions to limited partners pertaining to the fourth quarter of 2002
through the first quarter of 2003 in the amount of $672, which represented $0.48
per unit. On a cash basis, as reflected on the Statements of Cash Flows, after
paying redemptions and general partner distributions, $423 of these
distributions was from operating activities and the balance of $249 was a return
of capital. On an accrual basis, as reflected on the Statements of Partners'
Capital, after paying redemptions, $54 of these distributions were from current
year earnings and $618 was a return of capital.
From time to time, the Partnership redeems units from limited partners for a
specified redemption value, which is set by formula. Up to 2% of the
Partnership's outstanding units may be redeemed each year, although the 2% limit
may be exceeded at the Managing General Partner's discretion. All redemptions
are subject to the Managing General Partner's good faith determination that
payment for the redeemed units will not (i) cause the Partnership to be taxed as
a corporation, (ii) impair the capital or operations of the Partnership, or
(iii) impair the ability of the Partnership to pay distributions in accordance
with its distribution policy. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2003,
the Partnership redeemed 4,240 units for a total dollar amount of $15. The
Partnership used cash from operating activities to pay for the redeemed units.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the six-month periods ended June
30, 2003 and 2002, was $447 and $379, respectively. The increase of $68, or 18%,
was primarily due to fluctuations in net earnings (loss), adjusted for non-cash
transactions, offset by the fluctuations in gross accounts receivable. Net
earnings (loss), adjusted for non-cash transactions, fluctuated primarily due to
the increase in rental income and the decrease in direct container expenses.
These items are discussed more fully under "Results of Operations." The decrease
of $29 in gross accounts receivable for the six-month period ended June 30, 2003
was primarily due to a decline in the average collection period of accounts
receivable, partially offset by the increase in rental income. The decrease of
$66 in gross accounts receivable during the same period in 2002 was primarily
due to the decrease in rental income, partially offset by an increase in the
average collection period of accounts receivable.
For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, net cash provided by
investing activities (the sale of containers) was $178 and $321, respectively.
The decrease of $143 was due to the Partnership selling fewer containers at
lower average sales prices during the six-month period ended June 30, 2003,
compared to the equivalent period in 2002. The sales price received on container
sales continued to decrease as a result of current market conditions, which have
adversely affected the value of used containers. Some of the containers sold
were located in low demand locations, and these sales were driven by the
liquidation plans discussed above, and by adverse market conditions in these
locations. Until demand for containers improves in certain low demand locations,
the Partnership plans to continue selling some of its containers that are
off-lease in these locations rather than incurring the expense of repositioning
them. The sale of containers in these locations, the decline in the value of
used containers and the related market conditions are discussed more fully under
"Results of Operations."
Due, in part, to these market conditions and their effect on demand for used
containers, the Partnership has been primarily selling containers only if the
containers are at the end of their useful lives or if they are located in these
low demand locations. Therefore, and as noted above, the Partnership has
implemented its liquidation phase to date by selling containers gradually. The
Partnership will continue to evaluate its options for selling containers in the
context of both these market conditions and the Partnership's liquidation plans.
The number of containers sold both in low demand locations and elsewhere, as
well as the amount of sales proceeds, will affect how much the Partnership will
pay in future distributions to Partners.
Results of Operations
The Partnership's income from operations, which consists primarily of rental
income less costs and expenses (including container depreciation, direct
container expenses, management fees, and reimbursement of administrative
expenses) was directly related to the size of the container fleet during the
six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, as well as certain other factors
as discussed below. The following is a summary of the container fleet (in units)
available for lease during those periods:
2003 2002
---- ----
Beginning container fleet............... 3,822 4,416
Ending container fleet.................. 3,635 4,070
Average container fleet................. 3,729 4,243
The average container fleet decreased 12% from the six-month period ended June
30, 2002 to the comparable period in 2003, primarily due to the continuing sale
of containers (i) that had reached the end of their useful lives or (ii) that an
analysis had indicated that their sale was otherwise warranted. Included in this
second group were containers located in low demand locations. The Partnership
expects that the size of its container fleet will further decline as additional
containers are sold for these reasons and as the Partnership continues its
liquidation plans. The Partnership expects rental income to decline as the
container fleet declines. While the decline in the container fleet resulted in
lower rental income, this decrease was more than offset by the improvement in
utilization, resulting in the increase in rental income from the six-month
period ended June 30, 2002 to the same period in 2003. An overall decline in
rental income is expected in future years, as the size of the Partnership's
container fleet continues to decrease.
Rental income and direct container expenses are also affected by the average
utilization of the container fleet, which was 81% and 63% on average during the
six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The remaining
container fleet is off-lease and is located primarily at a large number of
storage depots. At June 30, 2003 and 2002, utilization was 85% and 71%,
respectively, and the Partnership's off-lease containers (in units) were in the
following locations:
2003 2002
---- ----
Americas 298 446
Europe 129 235
Asia 109 453
Other 25 26
--- -----
Total off-lease containers 561 1,160
=== =====
At June 30, 2003 approximately 12% of the Partnership's off-lease containers had
been specifically identified as for sale.
In addition to utilization, rental income is affected by daily rental rates. The
average daily rental rate for the Partnership's containers decreased 9% between
the periods. Average rental rates declined under both master and long term
leases, which are the two principal types of leases for the Partnership's
containers. The majority of the Partnership's rental income was generated from
leasing of the Partnership's containers under master operating leases, but in
the past several years an increasing percentage of the Partnership's containers
have been on lease under long term leases. At June 30, 2003 and 2002, 37% and
31%, respectively, of the Partnership's on-lease containers were on lease under
long term leases. Long term leases generally have lower rental rates than master
leases because the lessees have contracted to lease the containers for several
years and cannot return the containers prior to the termination date without a
penalty. Fluctuations in rental rates under either type of lease generally will
affect the Partnership's operating results.
The following is a comparative analysis of the results of operations for the
six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002.
The Partnership's income (loss) from operations for the six-month periods ending
June 30, 2003 and 2002 was $76 and ($58), respectively, on rental income of $847
and $800, respectively. The increase in rental income of $47, or 6%, from the
six-month period ended June 30, 2002 to the comparable period in 2003 was
attributable to increases in income from container rentals and other rental
income, which is discussed below. Income from container rentals, the major
component of total revenue, increased $43 or 6%, primarily due to the increase
in average on-hire utilization of 29%, offset by the decreases in average fleet
size of 12% and average rental rates of 9% between the periods.
Beginning in March 2002, utilization began to improve and improved steadily
through the end of 2002 due to:
o An increase in export cargo out of Asia
o Prior repositioning of containers to Asia which placed large
quantities of containers in areas of high demand
o Disposal of older containers and fewer purchases of new containers by
both container lessors and shipping lines in 2001 and 2002, resulting
in an overall better-balanced supply of containers
o The labor disagreement that affected U.S. West Coast ports in the
third and part of the fourth quarter had short-term positive effects
on demand for containers as shipping lines were not able to reposition
enough containers to Asia and had to lease more containers to meet
their customers' demands
Utilization declined slightly in the first quarter of 2003, which is
traditionally a slow period for container demand, and then improved slightly
during the second quarter of 2003. Rental rates also declined slightly in 2003
primarily due to low new container prices, low interest rates and low rates
offered by competitors. The General Partners are cautiously optimistic that
current utilization levels can be maintained or improved during the next several
months as the peak-shipping season begins. However, the General Partners caution
that market conditions could deteriorate again due to global economic and
political conditions. Demand for leased containers could therefore weaken again
and result in a decrease in utilization and further declines in lease rates and
container sale prices, adversely affecting the Partnership's operating results.
Although demand for leased containers improved, the trade imbalance between Asia
and the Americas continues. As a result, a large portion of the Partnership's
off-lease containers are located in low demand locations in the Americas as
detailed in the above chart. For these and other off-lease containers, the
Partnership determines whether these containers should be sold or held for
continued use. The decision to sell containers is based on the current
expectation that the economic benefit of selling these containers is greater
than the estimated economic benefit of continuing to own these containers. The
majority of the containers sold are older containers. The expected economic
benefit of continuing to own these older containers is significantly less than
that of newer containers. This is due to their shorter remaining marine life,
the cost to reposition them, and the shipping lines' preference for leasing
newer containers when they have a choice.
Once the decision is made to sell containers, the Partnership writes down the
value of these specifically identified containers when the carrying value was
greater than the container's estimated net realizable value, which is based on
recent sales prices less cost of sales. The average sales prices for containers
sold by the Partnership as well as other Partnerships managed by the General
Partners have decreased. The decrease is primarily due to a surplus of used
containers available for sale.
Other rental income consists of other lease-related items, primarily income from
charges to lessees for dropping off containers in surplus locations less credits
granted to lessees for leasing containers from surplus locations (location
income), income from charges to lessees for handling related to leasing and
returning containers (handling income) and income from charges to lessees for a
Damage Protection Plan (DPP). For the six-month period ended June 30, 2003,
other rental income was $121, an increase of $4 from the equivalent period in
2002. The increase in other rental income was primarily due to increases in DPP
and location income of $9 and $7, respectively, offset by a decrease in handling
income of $12. DPP income increased primarily due to the increase in the number
of containers covered under DPP. Location income increased primarily due to the
increase in charges to one lessee who required containers to be delivered to
specific locations. The decrease in handling income was primarily due to a
decrease in container movement.
Direct container expenses decreased $55, or 20%, from the six-month period ended
June 30, 2002 to the equivalent period in 2003. The decrease was primarily due
to the decrease in storage expense of $84, offset by the increase in
repositioning expense of $33. Storage expense decreased primarily due to the
increase in utilization noted above and the decrease in the average storage cost
per container. Repositioning expense increased due to an increase in the average
repositioning costs due to (i) expensive repositioning moves related to one
lessee who required containers to be delivered to certain locations as discussed
above and (ii) longer average repositioning moves. This increase was partially
offset by the decline in the number of containers repositioned between the
periods.
Bad debt expense was $8 and $1 for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and
2002, respectively. Fluctuations in bad debt expense reflect the required
adjustment to the bad debt reserve, after deductions had been taken against the
reserve, and are based on management's then current estimates of the portion of
accounts receivable that may not be collected, and which will not be covered by
insurance. These estimates are based primarily on management's current
assessment of the financial condition of the Partnership's lessees and their
ability to make their required payments. The expenses recorded during the
six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 reflect higher reserve
requirements from December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Depreciation expense increased $35, or 11%, from the six-month period ended June
30, 2002 to the comparable period in 2003, primarily due to an increase in the
depreciation rate as a result of changes in estimated salvage values as
discussed below, offset by the decrease in average fleet size noted above.
Effective July 1, 2002, the Partnership revised its estimate for container
salvage value from a percentage of equipment cost to an estimated dollar
residual value. The effect of this change for the six-month period ended June
30, 2003 was an increase to depreciation expense of $51. The Partnership will
evaluate the estimated residual values and remaining estimated useful lives on
an on-going basis and will revise its estimates as needed. As a result,
depreciation expense may fluctuate in future periods based on fluctuations in
these estimates.
The Partnership stopped purchasing containers in 1998, but its leasing
activities are affected by fluctuations in new container prices. New container
prices steadily declined from 1995 through 1999 and have remained low through
the first half of 2003. As a result, the cost of new containers purchased in
recent years is significantly less than the average cost of containers purchased
in prior years. The Partnership evaluated the recoverability of the recorded
amount of container rental equipment at June 30, 2003 and 2002 for containers to
be held for continued use and determined that a reduction to the carrying value
of these containers was not required. The Partnership also evaluated the
recoverability of the recorded amount of containers identified for sale in the
ordinary course of business and determined that a reduction to the carrying
value of some of these containers was required. The Partnership wrote down the
value of these containers to their estimated net realizable value, which was
based on recent sales prices less cost to sell. During the six-month periods
ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, the Partnership recorded write-down expenses of
$10 and $77, respectively, on 32 and 162 containers identified as for sale and
requiring a reserve. At June 30, 2003 and 2002, the net book value of the 41 and
168 containers identified for sale was $31 and $146, respectively.
The Partnership sold 35 previously written down containers for no gain during
the six-month period ended June 30, 2003 and sold 160 previously written down
containers for a loss of $16 during the same period in 2002. The Partnership
incurred losses on the sale of some containers previously written down as the
actual sales prices received on these containers were lower than the estimates
used for the write-downs.
The Partnership also sold containers that had not been written down and recorded
a loss of $38 and a gain of $5 during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2003,
and 2002, respectively.
As more containers are subsequently identified as for sale or if container sales
prices continue to decline, the Partnership may incur additional write-downs on
containers and/or may incur losses on the sale of containers. The Partnership
will continue to evaluate the recoverability of the recorded amounts of
container rental equipment.
Management fees to affiliates increased $4, or 6%, from the six-month period
ended June 30, 2002 to the same period in 2003, due to increases in both
equipment and incentive management fees. Equipment management fees increased due
to the increase in rental income, upon which these fees are primarily based.
These fees were approximately 7% of rental income for both periods. Incentive
management fees increased primarily due to the increase in the amount of
distributions paid from cash from operations.
General and administrative costs to affiliates decreased $5, or 11%, from the
six-month period ended June 30, 2002 to the comparable period in 2003. The
decrease was due to the decreases in overhead costs allocated from TEM and TFS.
The allocation from TEM decreased as the Partnership represented a smaller
portion of the fleet managed by TEM. The allocation from TFS decreased due to
the decrease in overhead costs incurred and allocated by TFS.
The Partnership Agreement provides for the ongoing payment to the General
Partners of the management fees and the reimbursement of the expenses discussed
above. Since these fees and expenses are established by the Agreement, they
cannot be considered the result of arms' length negotiations with third parties.
The Partnership Agreement was formulated at the Partnership's inception and was
part of the terms upon which the Partnership solicited investments from its
limited partners. The business purpose of paying the General Partners these fees
is to compensate the General Partners for the services they render to the
Partnership. Reimbursement for expenses is made to offset some of the costs
incurred by the General Partners in managing the Partnership and its container
fleet. More details about these fees and expenses are included in footnote 2 to
the Financial Statements.
Other general and administrative costs decreased $27 from the six-month period
ended June 30, 2002 to the same period in 2003. The decrease was primarily due
to decreases in other service fees between the periods.
Loss on sale of containers increased $27 from the six-month period ended June
30, 2002 to the comparable period in 2003. Although the Partnership sold fewer
containers, loss on sale of containers increased primarily due to the
Partnership incurring greater losses on the sale of containers due to the
decline in sales proceeds.
Net earnings/(loss) per limited partnership unit fluctuated from a loss of $0.05
during the six-month period ended June 30, 2002 to earnings of $0.05 during the
equivalent period in 2003, reflecting the fluctuation in net earnings/(loss)
allocated to limited partners from a loss of $66 to earnings of $69. The
allocation of net earnings/(loss) for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2003
and 2002 included a special allocation of gross income to the General Partners
of $8 and $12, respectively, in accordance with the Partnership Agreement.
The following is a comparative analysis of the results of operations for the
three-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002.
The Partnership's income (loss) from operations for the three-month periods
ending June 30, 2003 and 2002 was $10 and ($1), respectively, on rental income
of $417 and $396, respectively. The increase in rental income of $21, or 5%,
from the three-month period ended June 30, 2002 to the comparable period in 2003
was attributable to the increase in income from container rentals, partially
offset by the decrease in other rental income. Income from container rentals
increased $24 or 7%, primarily due to the increase in average on-hire
utilization of 28%, offset by the decreases in average fleet size of 11% and
average rental rates of 7% between the periods.
For the three-month period ended June 30, 2003, other rental income was $54, a
decrease of $3 from the equivalent period in 2002. The decrease was primarily
due to the decrease in handling income, offset by an increase in DPP income.
Handling income decreased primarily due to a decrease in container movement,
offset by an increase in the average handling charge per container. DPP income
increased primarily due to the increase in the number of containers covered
under DPP.
Direct container expenses decreased $30, or 20%, from the three-month period
ending June 30, 2002 to the equivalent period in 2003. The decrease was
primarily due to the decrease in storage expense of $37 offset by the increase
in repositioning expense of $7. Storage expense decreased due to the increase in
utilization noted above and a slight decrease in the average storage cost per
container. Repositioning expense increased due to an increase in the average
repositioning cost primarily due to longer average repositioning moves. This
increase was partially offset by the decline in the number of containers
repositioned between the periods.
Bad debt expense (benefit) was $10 and ($5) for the three-month periods ended
June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The expense recorded during the
three-month period ended June 30, 2003 reflects a higher reserve requirement
from March 31, 2003. The benefit recorded during the comparable period in 2002
reflects a lower reserve requirement from March 31, 2002.
Depreciation expense increased $15, or 10% from the three-month period ended
June 30, 2002 to the comparable period in 2003, primarily due to the change in
estimated salvage values used to calculate depreciation noted above, offset by a
decrease in average fleet size noted above. The effect of this change for the
three-month period ended June 30, 2003 was an increase to depreciation expense
of $22.
During the three-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, the Partnership
recorded write-down expenses of $4 and $24, respectively, on 19 and 55
containers identified as for sale and requiring a reserve. The Partnership sold
21 of these previously written down containers for a loss of $1 during the
three-month period ended June 30, 2003 and sold 87 previously written down
containers for a loss of $11 during the same period in 2002. The Partnership
also sold containers that had not been written down and recorded a loss of $29
and a gain of $28 during the three-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002,
respectively.
Management fees to affiliates increased $4, or 12%, from the three-month period
ended June 30, 2002 to the same period in 2003 due to increases in both
incentive and equipment management fees. Incentive management fees increased
primarily due to an increase in the amount of distributions made from cash from
operations. Equipment management fees increased due to the increase in rental
income and were 7% of rental income for both periods.
General and administrative costs to affiliates decreased $3, or 12%, from the
three-month period ended June 30, 2002 to the comparable period in 2003
primarily due to the decrease in overhead costs allocated from TEM, as the
Partnership represented a smaller portion of the total fleet managed by TEM.
Other general and administrative costs decreased $14 from the three-month period
ended June 30, 2002 to the same period in 2003. The decrease was primarily due
to decreases in other service fees between the periods.
Gain/loss on sale of containers fluctuated from a gain of $17 for the
three-month period ended June 30, 2002 to a loss of $30 for the same period in
2003. The fluctuation in gain/loss was primarily due to the Partnership
incurring losses on the sale of containers during the three-month period ended
June 30, 2003 compared to incurring gains in the same period in 2002.
Net earnings per limited partnership unit were $0.00 for both the three-month
periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, reflecting the net earnings (loss)
allocated to limited partners of $7 and ($4), respectively. The allocation of
net earnings (loss) included a special allocation of gross income to the General
Partners made in accordance with the Partnership Agreement.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Partnership's discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results
of operations are based upon the Partnership's financial statements, which have
been prepared on a going concern basis, in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Certain estimates and
assumptions were made by the Partnership's management that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenue and expenses during the reporting period. The Partnership's management
evaluates its estimates on an on-going basis, including those related to the
container rental equipment, accounts receivable and accruals.
These estimates are based on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the
results of which form the basis for making judgments regarding the carrying
values of assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those
estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The accompanying financial
statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which contemplates the
realization of assets and payments of liabilities in the ordinary course of
business.
The Partnership's management believes the following critical accounting policies
affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of
its financial statements.
The Partnership maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses
resulting from the inability of its lessees to make required payments. These
allowances are based on management's current assessment of the financial
condition of the Partnership's lessees and their ability to make their required
payments. If the financial condition of the Partnership's lessees were to
deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments,
additional allowances may be required, which would adversely affect the
Partnership's operating results.
The Partnership depreciates its container rental equipment based on certain
estimates related to the container's useful life and salvage value. These
estimates are based upon assumptions about future demand for leased containers
and the estimated sales price at the end of the container's useful life.
Effective July 1, 2002, the Partnership revised its estimate for container
salvage value from a percentage of equipment cost to an estimated dollar
residual value. The Partnership will evaluate the estimated residual values and
remaining estimated useful lives on an on-going basis and will revise its
estimates as needed. As a result, depreciation expense may fluctuate in future
periods based on fluctuations in these estimates. If the estimates regarding
residual value and remaining useful life of the containers were to decline,
depreciation expense would increase, adversely affecting the Partnership's
operating results.
Additionally, the recoverability of the recorded amounts of containers to be
held for continued use and identified for sale in the ordinary course of
business are evaluated to ensure that containers held for continued use are not
impaired and that containers identified for sale are recorded at amounts that do
not exceed the estimated fair value of the containers. Containers to be held for
continued use are considered impaired and are written down to estimated fair
value when the estimated future undiscounted cash flows are less than the
recorded values. Containers identified for sale are written down to estimated
fair value when the recorded value exceeds the estimated fair value. In
determining the estimated future undiscounted cash flows and fair value of
containers, assumptions are made regarding future demand and market conditions
for leased containers and the sales prices for used containers. If actual market
conditions are less favorable than those projected or if actual sales prices are
lower than those estimated by the Partnership, additional write-downs may be
required and/or losses may be realized. Any additional write-downs or losses
would adversely affect the Partnership's operating results.
Risk Factors and Forward Looking Statements
Although substantially all of the Partnership's income from operations is
derived from assets employed in foreign operations, virtually all of this income
is denominated in United States dollars. The Partnership's customers are
international shipping lines, which transport goods on international trade
routes. The domicile of the lessee is not indicative of where the lessee is
transporting the containers. The Partnership's business risk in its foreign
operations lies with the creditworthiness of the lessees, and the Partnership's
ability to keep its containers under lease, rather than the geographic location
of the containers or the domicile of the lessees. The containers are generally
operated on the international high seas rather than on domestic waterways. The
containers are subject to the risk of war or other political, economic or social
occurrence where the containers are used, which may result in the loss of
containers, which, in turn, may have a material impact on the Partnership's
results of operations and financial condition.
Other risks of the Partnership's leasing operations include competition, the
cost of repositioning containers after they come off-lease, the risk of an
uninsured loss, including bad debts, increases in maintenance expenses or other
costs of operating the containers, and the effect of world trade, industry
trends and/or general business and economic cycles on the Partnership's
operations. See "Risk Factors" in the Partnership's Prospectus, as supplemented,
for additional information on risks of the Partnership's business. See "Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates" above for information on the Partnership's
critical accounting policies and how changes in those estimates could adversely
affect the Partnership's results of operations.
The foregoing includes forward-looking statements and predictions about possible
or future events, results of operations and financial condition. These
statements and predictions may prove to be inaccurate, because of the
assumptions made by the Partnership or the General Partners or the actual
development of future events. No assurance can be given that any of these
forward-looking statements or predictions will ultimately prove to be correct or
even substantially correct. The risks and uncertainties in these forward-looking
statements include, but are not limited to, changes in demand for leased
containers, changes in global business conditions and their effect on world
trade, future modifications in the way in which the Partnership's lessees
conduct their business or of the profitability of their business, increases or
decreases in new container prices or the availability of financing therefore,
alterations in the costs of maintaining and repairing used containers, increases
in competition, changes in the Partnership's ability to maintain insurance for
its containers and its operations, the effects of political conditions on
worldwide shipping and demand for global trade or of other general business and
economic cycles on the Partnership, as well as other risks detailed herein and
from time to time in the Partnership's filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. The Partnership does not undertake any obligation to update
forward-looking statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Inapplicable.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Based on an evaluation of the Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934),
the managing general partner's principal executive officer and principal
financial officer have found those controls and procedures to be effective as of
the end of the period covered by the report. There has been no change in the
Partnership's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Partnership's most recent fiscal quarter, and which has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely materially to affect, the Partnership's internal control
over financial reporting.
Part II
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 Certifications pursuant to Rules 13a-14 or
15d-14 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.
Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted, and regarding Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
(b) Not applicable.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
TCC EQUIPMENT INCOME FUND
A California Limited Partnership
By Textainer Financial Services Corporation
The Managing General Partner
By ________________________________________
Ernest J. Furtado
Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 12, 2003
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Textainer Financial
Services Corporation, the Managing General Partner of the Registrant, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated:
Signature Title Date
________________________ Chief Financial Officer, Senior August 12, 2003
Ernest J. Furtado Vice President and Secretary
________________________ President August 12, 2003
John A. Maccarone
Part II
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 Certifications pursuant to Rules 13a-14 or
15d-14 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.
Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted, and regarding Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
(b) Not applicable.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
TCC EQUIPMENT INCOME FUND
A California Limited Partnership
By Textainer Financial Services Corporation
The Managing General Partner
By /s/Ernest J. Furtado
_________________________________________
Ernest J. Furtado
Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 12, 2003
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Textainer Financial
Services Corporation, the Managing General Partner of the Registrant, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated:
Signature Title Date
/s/Ernest J. Furtado
_________________________________ Chief Financial Officer, Senior August 12, 2003
Ernest J. Furtado Vice President and Secretary
/s/John A. Maccarone
_________________________________ President August 12, 2003
John A. Maccarone
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, John A. Maccarone, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on form 10-Q of TCC Equipment Income
Fund;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we
have:
a.) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
b.) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c.) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a.) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.
August 12, 2003
/s/ John A. Maccarone
_____________________________________
John A. Maccarone
President and Director of TFS
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Ernest J. Furtado, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on form 10-Q of TCC Equipment Income
Fund;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we
have:
a.) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
b.) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c.) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a.) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.
August 12, 2003
/s/ Ernest J. Furtado
________________________________________________
Ernest J. Furtado
Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President,
Secretary and Director of TFS
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
AS ADOPTED, REGARDING SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of TCC Equipment Income Fund, (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as
filed on August 12, 2003 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, John A. Maccarone, the President and Director of Textainer
Financial Services Corporation ("TFS") and Principal Executive Officer of TFS,
the Managing General Partner of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted, regarding Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the Registrant.
August 12, 2003
By /s/ John A. Maccarone
____________________________
John A. Maccarone
President and Director of TFS
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
AS ADOPTED, REGARDING SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of TCC Equipment Income Fund, (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as
filed on August 12, 2003 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Ernest J. Furtado, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President,
Secretary and Director of Textainer Financial Services Corporation ("TFS") and
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of TFS, the Managing General Partner
of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted,
regarding Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the Registrant.
August 12, 2003
By /s/ Ernest J. Furtado
_________________________________
Ernest J. Furtado
Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President,
Secretary and Director of TFS
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.