The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.

Vail Resorts, Inc. ("Vail Resorts") is organized as a holding company and operates through various subsidiaries. Vail Resorts and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") currently operate in three business segments: Mountain, Lodging and Real Estate. The Vail Corporation (d/b/a Vail Associates, Inc.), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Vail Resorts, and its subsidiaries (collectively, "Vail Associates") owns and operates four world-class ski resorts and related amenities at Vail, Breckenridge, Keystone and Beaver Creek mountains in Colorado. The Company, through a subsidiary, also owns and operates Heavenly Ski Resort ("Heavenly") in the Lake Tahoe area of California and Nevada. In addition to the ski resorts, Vail Associates owns Grand Teton Lodge Company ("GTLC"), which operates three resorts within Grand Teton National Park (under a National Park Service concessionaire contract) and the Jackson Hole Golf & Tennis Club in Wyoming. Vail Associates also owns a 51% interest in Snake Rive r Lodge & Spa ("SRL&S") located near Jackson, Wyoming and owns 100% of the Lodge at Rancho Mirage ("Rancho Mirage") near Palm Springs, California. The Company also holds a majority interest in RockResorts International, LLC ("RockResorts"), a luxury hotel management company. Vail Resorts Development Company ("VRDC"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Vail Associates, conducts the operations of the Company's Real Estate segment. The Company's mountain and lodging businesses are seasonal in nature. The Company's mountain and most of its lodging operations typically have operating seasons from late October through April; the Company's operations at GTLC generally run from mid-May through mid-October.

In the opinion of the Company, the accompanying Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements reflect all adjustments necessary to present fairly the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Results for interim periods are not indicative of the results for the entire year. The accompanying Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2002.

Use of Estimates--The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications--Certain reclassifications have been made to the accompanying Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements for the three and nine months ended April 30, 2002 to conform to the present period presentation.

Property, Plant and Equipment--Property, plant and equipment is carried at cost net of accumulated depreciation. Routine repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Expenditures that improve the functionality of the related equipment or extend the useful life are capitalized. When property, plant, and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related gain or loss is included in other income. Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line method based on the following useful lives:

Ski trails are depreciated over the remaining life of the respective United States Forest Service permits.

In November 2002, after a review of the useful lives of the Company's assets, management changed the depreciable lives of buildings and terminals to 30 years from 40 years. The Company believes 30 years to be a more appropriate estimate. The change increased quarterly depreciation expense by approximately $450,000 per quarter.

Stock Compensation Plans--At April 30, 2003, the Company had four stock-based compensation plans. The Company applies Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for stock-based compensation to employees. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for its fixed stock option plans. Had compensation cost for the Company's four stock-based compensation plans been determined consistent with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 123, "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation", the Company's net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below (in thousands, except per share amounts):

New Accounting Pronouncements--In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations". SFAS No. 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. It applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and/or the normal operation of a long-lived asset, except for certain obligations of lessees. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 143 on August 1, 2002. The Company does not currently have any obligations falling under the scope of SFAS No. 143. Adoption of SFAS No. 143 did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets". SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of", but retains the requirements of SFAS No.121 to (a) recognize an impairment loss only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows and (b) measure an impairment loss as the difference between the carrying amount and fair value of the asset. SFAS No. 144 removes goodwill from its scope as the impairment of goodwill is addressed pursuant to SFAS No. 142. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 144 on August 1, 2002. Adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections". This Statement rescinds SFAS No. 4, "Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt", SFAS No. 44, "Accounting for Intangible Assets of Motor Carriers" and SFAS No. 64, "Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements". This statement amends SFAS No. 13, "Accounting for Leases", to eliminate an inconsistency between the required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. SFAS No. 145 is generally effective for the Company for fiscal year 2003. Adoption of SFAS No. 145 did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

In May 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") reached consensus on EITF Issue No. 01-14, "Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements Received for "Out-of-Pocket" Expenses Incurred". This issue requires that reimbursements received for out-of-pocket expenses incurred should be characterized as revenue in the income statement. EITF Issue No. 01-14 should be applied in financial reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2001. The Company adopted the provisions of EITF Issue 01-14 on August 1, 2002. Adoption of EITF Issue 01-14 did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities". This statement requires that a liability for a cost that is associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. This statement nullifies the guidance of the EITF Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in Restructuring)". Under EITF No. 94-3, an entity recognized a liability for an exit cost on the date that the entity committed itself to an exit plan. SFAS No. 146 acknowledges that an entity's commitment to a plan does not, by itself, create a present obligation to other parties that meets the definition of a liability. SFAS No. 146 also establishes that fair value is the objective for the initial measurement of the liability. SFAS No. 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. Initial adoption of SFAS No. 146 did not have an impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation ("FIN") No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others", and interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57 and 107 and recission of FASB Interpretation No. 34. This interpretation elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The initial recognition and initial measurement provisions of this interpretation are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The disclosure requirements in the interpretation are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. The Company adopted the provi sions of FIN No. 45 as of January 1, 2003; initial adoption did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations (see Note 7, Commitments and Contingencies, of the Notes to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements).

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure - an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123". SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", by providing alternative methods of transition for an entity that voluntarily changes to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. It also amends the disclosure provisions of that statement to require prominent disclosure about the effects on reported net income of an entity's accounting policy decisions with respect to stock-based employee compensation. Finally, this Statement amends APB Opinion No. 28, "Interim Financial Reporting", to require disclosure about those effects in interim financial information. SFAS No. 148 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002 for transition guidance and annual disclosure provisions; interim disclosure provisions are effective for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002 . Initial adoption of SFAS No. 148 did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB 51". This interpretation addresses consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities ("VIEs"). This new model for consolidation applies to an entity in which either (1) the equity investors (if any) do not have a controlling financial interest or (2) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity's activities without receiving additional subordinated financial support from other parties. The interpretation applies immediately to VIEs created after April 30, 2003 and to VIEs in which the Company obtains an interest after that date. The interpretation applies in the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003 to VIEs in which the Company holds a variable interest acquired before February 1, 2003. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the implementation of this interpretation will have on its financial statements (see Note 1 1, Variable Interest Entities, of the Notes to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements).

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity". SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity; and requires that financial instruments within its scope, many of which currently are classified as equity, be classified as liabilities (or in some circumstances assets). SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. SFAS No. 150 is to be implemented by reporting the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for financial instruments created before the issuance of SFAS No. 150 and still existing at the beginning of the interim period of adoption. The Company is evaluating the impact SFAS No. 150 will have on its financial position or results of operations, if a ny.

Below is a reconciliation of the numerators (net income) and denominators (weighted-average shares outstanding) used in the calculation of both basic and diluted earnings per share ("EPS"). Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average shares outstanding. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised, resulting in the issuance of common shares that would then share in the earnings of the Company.

The number of shares issuable upon the exercise of common stock options that were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because the effect of their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive totaled 2.4 million and 2.1 million for the three months ended April 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The shares were anti-dilutive because their exercise price was greater than the average share price during the respective periods.

The number of shares issuable upon the exercise of common stock options that were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because the effect of their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive totaled 2.2 million and 2.1 million for the nine months ended April 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The shares were anti-dilutive because their exercise price was greater than the average share price during the respective periods.

Long-term debt as of April 30, 2003, July 31, 2002 and April 30, 2002 is summarized as follows (in thousands):

Aggregate maturities for debt outstanding as of April 30, 2003 are as follows (in thousands):

The Company was in compliance with all of its financial and operating covenants required to be maintained under its debt instruments for all periods presented.

The composition of accounts payable and accrued expenses follows (in thousands):

Effective October 31, 2002, Mr. Daly ceased to be an employee of the Company. The Company recorded $1.3 million of compensation expense in its first fiscal quarter of 2003 in relation to Mr. Daly's severance agreement.

In connection with the employment of Blaise Carrig as Chief Operating Officer of Heavenly Valley Limited Partnership ("Heavenly LP"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, Heavenly LP agreed to invest up to $600,000, but not to exceed 50% of the purchase price, for the purchase of a residence for Mr. Carrig and his family in the greater Lake Tahoe area. In November 2002, the Company contributed $449,500 toward the purchase price of the residence and thereby obtained a 50% undivided ownership interest in such residence. Upon the resale of the residence, or within approximately 18 months of the termination of Mr. Carrig's employment with Heavenly LP, whichever is earlier, Heavenly LP is entitled to receive its proportionate share of the resale price of the residence, less certain deductions.

In February 2003, Marc J. Rowan, a director of the Company and a founding principal of Apollo Advisors, and Michael Gross (also a founding principal of Apollo Advisors), each purchased a homesite at Bachelor Gulch Village. The purchases occurred pursuant to the September 1999 contracts between the Company and the purchasers, as previously disclosed in the Company's annual proxy statements since 1999. The purchase price for each site was $378,000 , which the Company believes to be the approximate fair market value of the sites at the time of the original contracts, less a credit of $132,300 for the actual cost of certain infrastructure costs, such as architectural plans, necessary to develop the sites. The Company determined the sales price at the time of the contracts based on a formula used by the Company's real estate subsidiary for establishing the base land price of a cluster home development parcel under contract at the time to a third party developer, and the assumed square footage of the residence expected to be built on the sites as indicated by Messrs. Rowan and Gross. Also, as previously stated in the Company's proxy statements, the contracts were amended to extend the original closing dates on each property from January 2001 to January 2003. At the time of the purchases by Messrs. Rowan and Gross in February 2003, the Company believes that the fair market value of each site was approximately $1.6-$1.7 million, based generally on the Company's familiarity with appreciated values of Bachelor Gulch real estate.

Smith Creek Metropolitan District ("SCMD") and Bachelor Gulch Metropolitan District ("BGMD") were organized in November 1994 to cooperate in the financing, construction and operation of basic public infrastructure serving the Company's Bachelor Gulch Village development. SCMD was organized primarily to own, operate and maintain water, street, traffic and safety, transportation, fire protection, parks and recreation, television relay and translation, sanitation and certain other facilities and equipment of BGMD. BGMD collects property tax payments from the property owners within the Bachelor Gulch Village development and a capital improvement fee from the Company. A portion of those revenues is remitted to SCMD. SCMD is comprised of approximately 150 acres of open space land owned by the Company and members of the Board of Directors of the SCMD. In two planned unit developments, Eagle County has granted zoning approval for 1,395 dwelling units within Bachelor Gulch Village, including various single-fam ily homesites, cluster homes and townhomes, and lodging units. As of April 30, 2003, the Company has sold 110 single-family homesites and 22 parcels to developers for the construction of various types of dwelling units. Currently, SCMD has outstanding $27.9 million of variable rate revenue bonds maturing on October 1, 2035, which have been enhanced with a $29.6 million letter of credit issued against the Company's Credit Facility. The letter of credit was issued by the Company to facilitate the issuance of the variable rate revenue bonds. This letter of credit expires October 31, 2004. It is anticipated that as the Bachelor Gulch community expands, BGMD will become self supporting and that within 25 to 30 years will issue general obligation bonds, the proceeds of which will be used to retire the SCMD revenue bonds. Until that time, the Company has agreed to subsidize the interest payments on the SCMD revenue bonds. The Company has estimated the present value of this aggregate subsidy to be $15.1 million and $14.8 million at April 30, 2003 and July 31, 2002, respectively, and has recorded the entire amount as a liability, primarily within other long-term liabilities, in the accompanying financial statements. The total subsidy incurred as of April 30, 2003 and 2002 was $10.9 million and $9.8 million, respectively.

Holland Creek Metropolitan District ("HCMD") and Red Sky Ranch Metropolitan District ("RSRMD") were organized in December 2000 to cooperate in the financing, construction and operation of basic public infrastructure serving the Company's Red Sky Ranch development. HCMD was organized primarily to own, operate and maintain water, street, traffic and safety, transportation, fire protection, parks and recreation, television relay and translation, sanitation and certain other facilities and equipment of RSRMD. RSRMD collects property tax payments from the property owners within the Red Sky Ranch development and a capital improvement fee from the Company. A portion of those revenues is remitted to HCMD. HCMD is comprised of approximately 150 acres of open space land owned by the Company and members of the Board of Directors of HCMD. In two planned unit developments, Eagle County has granted zoning approval for 87 dwelling units, two golf courses, and related facilities for the property within the districts. Sev en of the dwelling units are owned by a third party developer. The Company's current plans call for approximately 53 home sites to be sold over the next two years, and all 80 units to be constructed over the next eleven years. As of April 30, 2003, the Company has sold 42 of the 53 home sites. Currently, HCMD has outstanding $12 million of variable rate revenue bonds maturing on June 1, 2041, which have been enhanced with a $12.1 million letter of credit issued against the Company's Credit Facility. The letter of credit was issued by the Company to facilitate the issuance of the variable rate revenue bonds. This letter of credit expires October 31, 2004. It is anticipated that, as Red Sky Ranch expands, RSRMD will become self supporting and that within 5 to 15 years it will issue general obligation bonds, the proceeds of which will be used to retire the HCMD revenue bonds. Until that time, the Company has agreed to subsidize the interest payments on the HCMD revenue bonds. The Company has estimated the prese nt value of the aggregate subsidy to be $1.9 million at April 30, 2003 and July 31, 2002 and has recorded that amount as a liability, primarily within other long-term liabilities, in the accompanying financial statements. The total subsidy incurred as of April 30, 2003 and 2002 was $639,000 and $199,000, respectively.

The Company has ownership interests in four entities (BC Housing LLC, The Tarnes at BC, LLC, Tenderfoot Seasonal Housing, LLC and Breckenridge Terrace, LLC) which were formed to construct, own and operate employee housing facilities in exchange for rent payments from tenants in and around Beaver Creek, Keystone and Breckenridge. The Company's ownership interest in each entity ranges from 26% to 50%. The Company accounts for each of these investments under the equity method. Each entity has issued interest-only taxable bonds with weekly low-floater rates tied to LIBOR (the "Housing Bonds") in two series, Tranche A and Tranche B. The Housing Bonds do not have stated maturity dates. The Tranche A Housing Bonds have principal amounts which range from $5.7 million to $15 million ($37.8 million in aggregate), enhanced with letters of credit issued against the Company's Credit Facility in amounts ranging from $5.8 million to $15.2 million ($38.3 million in aggregate). The letters of credit were issued by the Com pany to facilitate the housing entities' ability to obtain external financing. Those letters of credit expire October 31, 2004. The Tranche B Housing Bonds range in principal amount from $1.5 million to $5.9 million ($14.8 million in aggregate) and are collateralized by the assets of the entities. The Company also guarantees debt service of $13.3 million on the Tranche B Housing Bonds, of which $7.4 million expire May 1, 2004 and $5.9 million expire June 1, 2005. The proceeds of the Housing Bonds were used to construct the housing facilities. The housing facilities (except Breckenridge Terrace, LLC) are located on land owned by the Company which is leased to each respective entity. The Company has the right to rent a certain percentage of the units in the housing facilities to provide seasonal housing for its employees. In aggregate, the Company paid rents of $5.2 million and $4.8 million to the four entities for the nine months ended April 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

At April 30, 2003 the Company had various other letters of credit outstanding in the aggregate amount of $10.6 million.

In addition to the guarantees noted above, the Company has entered into contracts in the normal course of business which include certain indemnifications within the scope of FIN No. 45 under which it may be required to make payments in relation to certain transactions. These indemnities primarily include indemnities to licensees in connection with the licensees' use of the Company's trademarks and logos, indemnities for liabilities associated with the infringement of other parties' technology based upon the Company's software products and indemnities related to liabilities associated with the use of easements. The duration of these indemnities generally is indefinite. These indemnities also generally do not limit the future payments the Company could be obligated to make. The Company has not recorded any liability for these indemnities in the accompanying financial statements, either because the indemnification existed prior to January 1, 2003 and is therefore not subject to the measurement requirements o f FIN No. 45, or because the Company has calculated the fair value of the indemnification to be de minimus based upon the current facts and circumstances that would trigger a payment under the indemnification clause. The Company does, however, accrue for losses for any known contingent liability, including those that may arise from indemnification provisions, when future payment is probable and measurable.

As noted above, the Company makes certain indemnifications to licensees in connection with the licensees' use of the Company's trademarks and logos. The Company does not record any product warranty liability with respect to these indemnifications related to licensing the Company's trademarks and logos.

Certain subsidiaries of the Company are defendants in two related lawsuits filed in the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming. The case arises out of a carbon monoxide accident in a hotel room at the Snake River Lodge and Spa in Teton Village, Wyoming, resulting in the death of a doctor from North Carolina and the alleged injury to his wife. The accident occurred on August 2, 2001. The Snake River Lodge & Spa is 51% owned by a subsidiary of the Company. One lawsuit is a wrongful death action on behalf of the estate of the deceased, and the other lawsuit is a personal injury action on the part of his wife.

A First Amended Complaint was filed by the plaintiffs (the wife in the personal injury case, and the wife personally and on behalf of the estate of the deceased in the wrongful death suit) in both lawsuits in July 2002 naming as defendants JHL&S, LLC d/b/a/ Snake River Lodge & Spa, Teton Hospitality Services, Inc., Grand Teton Lodge Company and Vail Resorts Development Company, all subsidiaries of the Company. In May 2003, the plaintiffs dismissed the non-Company related defendants that previously had been named as defendants, a plumbing company in Jackson, Wyoming and a general contractor based in Salt Lake City.

The Complaints allege negligence and strict liability on the part of all and each of the defendants and seek damages, including exemplary and punitive damages, in amounts to be proven at trial. The Company's subsidiary defendants filed a motion in June 2003 seeking partial summary judgment to dismiss the plaintiffs' claim for punitive damages. The trials (which may be consolidated) are set to begin in late November 2003. Discovery is underway in the matters, and is scheduled to continue through mid summer 2003. The Company intends to defend the cases vigorously at trial. The Company anticipates that any damages arising out of the accident paid by the Company, excepting any amounts attributable to punitive damages, would be covered by insurance carried by the Company. However, the Company cannot predict the outcome of the cases at this time or consequently whether the outcome may be material to the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

The Company is a party to various other lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes the Company has adequate insurance coverage and accrued loss contingencies for all such matters and that, although the ultimate outcome of such claims cannot be ascertained, current pending and threatened claims are not expected to have a material adverse impact on the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company.

In February 2003, the SEC informed the Company that it has issued a formal order of investigation with respect to the Company. The inquiry relates to the Company's previous accounting treatment for recognizing revenue on initiation fees related to the sale of memberships in private member clubs. In October 2002, after voluntary consultation with the SEC staff on the appropriate accounting, the Company restated and reissued its historical financial statements for fiscal 1999-2001, reflecting a revision in the accounting for these club initiation fees (see Note 8, Restatements, of the Notes to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements). The Company is fully cooperating with the SEC and expects no changes will be made as a result of this SEC inquiry to the Company's historical financial statements.

The Company has executed as lessee operating leases for the rental of office space, employee residential units and office equipment through fiscal 2008. For the nine months ended April 30, 2003 and 2002, the Company recorded lease expense related to these agreements of $14.4 million and $13.3 million, respectively, which is included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Future minimum lease payments under these leases as of April 30, 2003 are as follows (in thousands):

For a comparison of the originally reported quarterly statement of operations data for the three and nine months ended April 30, 2002 and the restated quarterly statement of operations data for the same period, refer to the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2002. The restatement created no adjustments to the Consolidated Condensed Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended April 30, 2002 included in this Form 10-Q. The following table presents a comparison of the quarterly statement of financial position data as reported in the April 30, 2002 Form 10-Q to the Company's current presentation:

The Company's payment obligations under the 8.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 (see Note 4), are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several, senior subordinated basis by substantially all of the Company's consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, and excluding Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries (as defined below), the "Guarantor Subsidiaries") except for Boulder/Beaver LLC, Colter Bay Corporation, Eagle Park Reservoir Company, Forest Ridge Holdings, Inc., Gros Ventre Utility Company, Jackson Lake Lodge Corporation, Jenny Lake Lodge, Inc., Mountain Thunder, Inc., Timber Trail, Inc., Resort Technology Partners, LLC, RT Partners, Inc., SSV, Vail Associates Investments, Inc., and VR Holdings, Inc. (together, the "Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries").

Presented below is the consolidated condensed financial information of Vail Resorts, Inc. (the "Parent Company"), the Guarantor Subsidiaries and the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries. Financial information for Larkspur Restaurant & Bar, LLC ("Larkspur"), RockResorts and JHL&S, LLC ("JHL&S") are presented separately as the Company owns less than 100% of these Guarantor Subsidiaries. Financial information for the Non-Guarantor subsidiaries is presented in the column titled "Other Subsidiaries". Balance sheet data is presented as of April 30, 2003, July 31, 2002, and April 30, 2002. Statement of operations and statement of cash flows data are presented for the nine months ended April 30, 2003 and 2002.

Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for by the Parent Company and Guarantor Subsidiaries using the equity method of accounting. Net income (loss) of Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries is, therefore, reflected in the Parent Company's and Guarantor Subsidiaries' investments in and advances to (from) subsidiaries. Net income (loss) of the Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries is reflected in Guarantor Subsidiaries and Parent Company as equity in consolidated subsidiaries. The elimination entries eliminate investments in Other Subsidiaries and intercompany balances and transactions for consolidated reporting purposes.