1

     California First National Bancorp (the "Company") is a bank holding company incorporated in California with leasing and bank subsidiaries based in Orange County, California. Effective on May 22, 2001, Amplicon, Inc., a California corporation ("Amplicon"), reorganized itself as a holding company. In doing so, California First National Bancorp, became the holding company and Amplicon became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company became a bank holding company on May 23, 2001 when it acquired all of the outstanding stock of California First National Bank ("CalFirst Bank" or the "Bank"). The Company has two leasing subsidiaries, Amplicon and California First Leasing Corporation ("CFLC", collectively the "Leasing Companies"). The operations of CFLC did not commence until July 2, 2001. The leasing operations consist of the leasing and financing of computers, computer networks and other high technology assets through a centralized marketing program designed to offer cost-effective leasing alternatives. The leasing subsidiaries are also engaged in the re-marketing of leased assets at lease expiration.

     The Company's banking subsidiary, CalFirst Bank, which commenced operations on May 23, 2001, is a FDIC-insured national bank that gathers deposits using the telephone, the Internet, and direct mail from a centralized location. The Bank will lease capital assets to businesses and organizations and will provide business loans to fund the purchase of assets leased by third parties. It is anticipated that the operations of CalFirst Bank will not be profitable during this start-up phase and may have a material impact on the consolidated operating results of the Company.

     This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical or current facts, including statements about beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, and important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. Factors that might affect forward-looking statements include, among other things: (i) general economic or industry conditions could be less favorable than expected, resulting in a reduced demand for capital assets, deterioration in credit quality, and a change in the allowance for credit losses; (ii) changes in the domestic interest rate environment could reduce interest income and could increase credit losses; (iii) CalFirst Bank is a start-up bank and may not attract or retain sufficient deposits at attractive interest rates to fund its lease portfolio, and therefore could require additional investment by the Company, produce lower lease growth and greater losses; (iv) security breaches, systems failures, computer viruses or other similar events could damage CalFirst Bank's reputation, or Internet banks in general, and inhibit the ability to raise deposits; (v) the conditions of the securities markets could change, adversely affecting the value or credit quality of the Company's assets, or the availability and terms of funding necessary to meet the Company's liquidity needs; (vi) changes in the extensive laws, regulations and policies governing financial services companies could alter the Company's business environment or affect operations; (vii) catastrophic events could impair the Company's business operations or systems, or that of its lessees, resulting in losses; and (viii) all the above factors could impact the Company's ability to remain in compliance with commitments made to federal bank regulators in connection with the formation of CalFirst Bank. The result of these and other factors could cause a difference from expectations of the risk characteristics of the lease portfolio, the level of defaults and a change in the provision for loan and lease losses. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made. The Company undertakes no obligations to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances arising after the date on which they are made.

     The Leasing Companies lease and re-market most capital assets used by businesses and organizations, with a focus on high technology equipment and software systems. The Leasing Companies' leases are structured individually and can provide end-of-term options to accommodate a variety of objectives. Approximately 62% of the leases originated in fiscal 2001 involved computer workstations and networks, mid-range computers, computer automated design systems and computer software. Other major property groups included manufacturing equipment, furniture and fixtures, telecommunications systems, and point-of-sale systems.

2

     Computer Systems. The Leasing Companies concentrate on the market for computer networks and mid-range computers because this market is particularly receptive to leasing services. Advances in technology, including the rapidly expanding capabilities of personal computer systems and the growth of the Internet, have led to increased demand for more powerful systems and communications networks throughout the Leasing Companies' target markets. Computer networks typically consist of a central server, which may be a mid-range computer or high-end microcomputer, multiple personal computers and workstations, network communications hardware and software, printers and associated products. Computer networks generally range in cost from $100,000 to $3,000,000. The Leasing Companies' leased property is used primarily by middle-market companies for centralized data processing, by subsidiaries and divisions of large companies to supplement mainframe computer systems, and by non-profit associations and institutions.

     The Leasing Companies lease computer systems and network products manufactured by Cisco Systems, Inc. ("Cisco"), Compaq Computer Company ("Compaq"), Dell Computer Company ("Dell"), Gateway 2000, Inc. ("Gateway"), International Business Machines Company ("IBM"), Hewlett-Packard Co. ("HP"), and Sun Microsystems, Inc. ("Sun"), among many others.

    Software. The Leasing Companies lease operating system software products and specialized application software packages. These application software packages typically range in cost from $50,000 to $1,000,000. In addition to leasing stand-alone software packages, an increasing percentage of the cost of computer systems and networks consists of operating and application software. The Leasing Companies lease software from vendors such as Microsoft Company, Oracle Company, J.D. Edwards & Company, PeopleSoft Inc., Geac Computer Company Limited, MSC Company, and SAP AG.

     Other Electronic Equipment. Advances in microcomputer technology have also expanded the scope of other electronic equipment utilized by the Leasing Companies' existing and targeted customer base. Retail point-of-sale systems include those produced by IBM, Knogo Company, NCR Company ("NCR"), and Fujitsu Limited, while bank automated teller machines also have been procured from NCR. The telecommunications property leased by the Leasing Companies include digital private branch equipment, switching equipment and voice mail systems manufactured by Lucent Technologies, Siemens Business Communications Systems, Inc. and ITT Industries, as well as satellite tracking systems manufactured by Qualcomm Incorporated. The Leasing Companies also lease imaging systems, testing equipment, and copying equipment.

     Production Equipment and Other Personal Property. The Leasing Companies lease technology-related manufacturing and distribution management systems that include complex computer controlled manufacturing and production systems, printing presses and warehouse distribution systems. In addition, the Leasing Companies lease a wide variety of personal property in the "non-high technology" area, including machine tools, trucks and office furniture.

     Marketing Strategy

     The Leasing Companies market through a centralized marketing program and direct delivery channels, such as telephone, the Internet, facsimile and express mail. The marketing program includes a confidential database of current and potential users of business property; a training program to introduce new marketing employees to the Leasing Companies' marketing techniques, and an in-house computer and telecommunications system. The Leasing Companies have augmented their marketing programs through the development of interactive websites that enable prospective customers to review a lease agreement, calculate lease payments and submit a credit application on-line.

     The Leasing Companies implemented their current marketing systems after having determined that a centralized marketing program is more cost effective than field sales representatives. Marketing through the telephone or the Internet, rather than through field sales representatives, has enabled the Leasing Companies to limit selling, general and administrative expenses and, consequently, allows the Leasing Companies to offer more competitive rates to customers.

3

     The Leasing Companies identify potential customers through a variety of methods. The Leasing Companies purchase lists of target market participants and computer users from private sources, conducts direct mail and telephone campaigns to generate sales leads, and maintains proprietary records of contacts made with potential customers by its sales professionals. The Leasing Companies utilize prospect management software to enhance the productivity of their respective sales forces. Specific information about potential customers is entered into an on-line confidential database accessible to sales professional and their managers. As potential customers are contacted, the database is updated and supplemented with information about what computer and other property they are using, related lease expiration dates and any future system needs or replacement plans. The database allows sales professionals to identify efficiently the most likely purchaser or lessee of capital assets and to concentrate efforts on these prospective customers.

     The Leasing Companies' databases, combined with the respective prospect management software and an integrated in-house telecommunications system, permit the Leasing Companies' sales management to monitor account executive activity, daily prospect status and pricing information. The ability to monitor account activity and offer immediate assistance in negotiating or pricing a transaction makes it possible for the Leasing Companies to be responsive to their customers and prospects.

     Leasing Activities

    The Leasing Companies' leases are generally for terms ranging from two to five years. All of the Leasing Companies' leases are noncancelable "net" leases which contain "hell-or-high-water" provisions under which the lessee must make all lease payments regardless of any defects in the property, and which require the lessee to maintain and service the property, insure the property against casualty loss and pay all property, sales and other taxes. The Leasing Companies retain ownership of the property they lease, and in the event of default by the lessee, the Leasing Companies or the lender to whom the lease had been assigned may declare the lessee in default, accelerate all lease payments due under the lease and pursue other available remedies, including repossession of the property. Upon the expiration of the leases, the lessee typically has an option, which is dependent upon each lease's defined end of term options, to either purchase the property at a negotiated price, or in the case of a "conditional sales contract," at a predetermined minimum price, or to renew the lease. If the purchase option is not exercised by the original lessee, once the leased property is returned, the Leasing Companies will endeavor to locate a new lessee; however, if a new lessee cannot be located, then the Leasing Companies will seek to sell the leased property. The terms of the Leasing Companies' software leases are substantially similar to its equipment leases.

     The Leasing Companies conduct their leasing business in a manner designed to minimize their risk. The Leasing Companies do not purchase leased property until they have received a binding noncancelable lease from the customer. Historically, a substantial portion of the leases have been discounted to banks or finance companies on a nonrecourse basis at fixed interest rates that reflect the customers' financial condition. During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, 35.9% and 79.7%, respectively, of the total dollar amount of new leases entered into by the Leasing Companies were discounted to financial institutions. The institutional lender to which a lease has been assigned has no recourse against the Leasing Companies, unless the Leasing Companies are in default under the terms of the agreement by which the lease was assigned. The institution to which a lease has been assigned may take title to the leased property, but only in the event the lessee fails to make lease payments or otherwise defaults under the terms of the lease. If this occurs, the Leasing Companies may not realize their residual investment in the leased property.

     Over the past two years, the Leasing Companies have retained an increasing number of lease transactions in their own portfolio that meet credit standards set by the Leasing Companies' credit committees. Some of these transactions are entered into where the value of the underlying leased property, or the credit profile of the lessee, is not acceptable to other financial institutions. Each of these transactions must meet or exceed certain credit or profitability requirements established, on a case by case basis, by the Leasing Companies' credit committee. In addition, the Leasing Companies invest in lease transactions which the Leasing Companies believe could be placed at a later date with nonrecourse lenders on a lease-by-lease basis or in a portfolio. At June 30, 2001 and 2000, the discounted minimum lease payments receivable related to leases maintained in the Leasing Companies' portfolio amounted to $95,251,262 and $49,111,050, respectively.

4

     The Leasing Companies often make payments to purchase leased property prior to the commencement of the lease and assignment to the nonrecourse debt source. The disbursements for such lease transactions in process are generally made to facilitate the property implementation schedule of the lessees. The lessee is contractually obligated to make rental payments directly to the Leasing Companies during the period that the transaction is in process, and generally is obligated to reimburse the Leasing Companies for all disbursements under certain circumstances. At June 30, 2001 and 2000, the Leasing Companies' investment in property acquired for transactions in process amounted to $20,489,995 and $25,909,137, respectively.

     The Leasing Companies monitor the performance of the leases held in their own portfolio as well as transactions in process. The Leasing Companies also monitor lease transactions assigned to lenders, if the Leasing Companies retain a residual investment in the leased property subject to the lease. As problems are identified, an allowance for doubtful accounts or allowance for valuation of unguaranteed residual value may be made. Management believes that appropriate levels of reserves have been estimated based upon factors and trends identified. Economic stagnation or reversals in the economy could give rise to increasing risk of credit losses and necessitate an increase in the required level of reserves. Over the past two fiscal years, the Leasing Companies have retained a significantly greater percentage of leases in their own portfolio, which creates increased exposure to delinquencies, repossessions, foreclosures and losses than the Leasing Companies have historically experienced.

     On May 23, 2001 the operations of CalFirst Bank commenced. The activity of the Bank has been limited during the start-up phase of operations and consequently minimal deposits have been established and no leases have been booked as of June 30, 2001.

     The Bank will be focused on gathering deposits from depositors nationwide, for the primary purpose of funding capital assets that will be leased to small and mid-sized companies, not-for-profit organizations, associations and both private and public educational institutions. The leasing assets will be generated through direct origination of leases by the Bank's own lease organization and through the purchase of lease receivables from other lessors, including the Leasing Companies. Pursuant to the Bank's operating plan, no more than 50% of its lease portfolio will represent purchases of lease receivables from the Leasing Companies.

    The Bank will be operated in much the same cost-efficient way that the Leasing Companies operate, intending to be a low cost producer through marketing its products and services directly to end users and offering quality customer service. The Bank believes that its operating costs generally will be lower than those of traditional "bricks and mortar" banks because it does not have the expense of a traditional branch network to generate deposits and conduct operations.

     Deposit Products

     To date, the Bank has not actively sought to attract deposits. The Bank plans to identify depositors through a variety of methods, including the Internet, direct mail, telephone campaigns, purchase of leads from private sources and print advertisements. The Bank offers two types of interest-bearing checking accounts, savings accounts and three (3) month to three (3) year certificates of deposit ("CDs") to taxable and IRA depositors. CDs will be offered with varying maturities in order to achieve a fair approximation or match of the average life of the Bank's expected lease portfolio. With leases generally providing for fixed rental rates, a matching fixed rate CD book should allow the Bank to minimize interest rate fluctuation risk. It is expected that the Bank will generally offer interest rates on deposit accounts that are higher than the national average.

     To open a new account, a customer can complete an on-line enrollment form on the Bank's Web site, or can call the Bank's toll-free customer service number and open an account telephonically. Signature cards and deposits are then mailed to the Bank. Customers can make deposits by wire transfer, via direct deposit programs, or by mail. No teller line is maintained. The Bank's customers have 24-hour access to account information. Customers can view their banking records and current balances, and transfer funds between accounts through the use of personal computers. They can also pay bills on-line. Each customer automatically receives a free ATM card upon opening an account. In order to obtain cash, the Bank's customers use other banks' automated teller machines that are affiliated with the Plus system. The Bank generally will reimburse customers for some portion of any ATM fees charged by other financial institutions. The Bank believes that any inconvenience resulting from the Bank not

5

maintaining automated teller machines or a local branch office will be offset by the Bank's higher investment yields and lower banking fees.

     Leasing Operations

     The Bank plans to develop its lease portfolio through offering lease financing to the Leasing Companies, to non-affiliated leasing companies and through direct lease originations meeting the Bank's underwriting standards. The Bank will internally fund all Bank origination's and lease purchases, and consequently, the Bank retains the credit risk on such leases. The Bank's strategy is to develop a conservative, diversified portfolio of leases with high credit quality lessees which provide profitability and growth. The Bank's loan committee has established underwriting standards and criteria for the lease portfolio and will monitor the portfolio on an ongoing basis. The Bank will perform an independent credit analysis and due diligence on each lease transaction originated or purchased. The committee applies the same underwriting standards to all leases, regardless of how they are originated.

     The Bank has also implemented policies and procedures for identifying and qualifying third-party lessors. In sourcing third-party lease originations, the Bank will target those seasoned leasing companies whose principals are determined to be reputable, ethical and experienced with positive leasing operations histories. The Bank's due diligence, including background checks, qualifications verification and credit evaluation of the lessor firm and its principals, is considered to be as important as that conducted for each lessee.

     The Bank lease origination operations are similar to that established in the Leasing Companies. The marketing strategy, types of leased property and lease terms will be similar. Unlike the Leasing Companies, however, the Bank does not plan to discount lease receivables related to Bank lease originations to other financial institutions, but will retain all lease receivables in its own portfolio. The Bank will own the underlying assets for these leases, and therefore will retain all residual interests related to lease originations.

     Through its lease purchase operations, the Bank will purchase lease receivables on a nonrecourse basis at fixed interest rates that reflect the proposed lessee's financial condition and current market conditions. The Bank will not be the lessor for these transactions, and the original lessor will retain ownership of any underlying asset, with the Bank taking a priority first lien position. The Bank will verify the completeness of each third-party lease prior to purchase, to confirm that all documentation is correct and held, that liens have been perfected, and legal documentation has been filed as appropriate.

     In addition to leases, the Bank will invest deposit funds in various investment securities. The securities portfolio will be comprised of federal funds sold, high-quality securities including United States agency obligations, mortgage pool securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, investment grade corporate bonds, and United States Treasury securities.

     Bank Operations

     The Bank's operations have been developed by outsourcing certain principal operational functions to leading bank industry service providers and by sharing established systems utilized by the Leasing Companies or the Company. Outsourced systems include the Bank's core processing and electronic banking system, electronic bill payment systems and depositary services, including item processing. The Bank believes it benefits from the service provider's expertise and economies of scale and investments in developing technology. A critical element to the Bank's success is the ability to provide secure transmission of confidential information over the Internet. The Bank's service providers utilize sophisticated technology to provide maximum security. All banking transactions are encrypted and all transactions are routed from the Internet server through a "firewall" that limits access to the Bank's and service provider's systems. Systems are in place to detect attempts by third parties to access other users' accounts and feature a high degree of physical security, secure modem access, service continuity and transaction monitoring.

     The Leasing Companies provide certain services to the Bank, pursuant to a formal agreement, including servicing the Bank's lease portfolio on the Bank's behalf. The Leasing Companies, as servicer, and the Bank will maintain a delinquency reporting and monitoring system to identify potential problems in the lease portfolio early and address them in a timely manner.

6

     Leasing customers are primarily middle-market companies, subsidiaries and divisions of Fortune 1000 companies and organizations and institutions located throughout the United States with credit ratings acceptable to the Company's subsidiaries or lenders providing nonrecourse loans. The Company does not believe that the loss of any one customer would have a material adverse effect on all of its operations taken as a whole.

     The laws, regulations and policies affecting financial services businesses are continually under review by Congress and state legislatures and federal and state regulatory agencies. From time to time, legislation is enacted which has the effect of increasing the cost of doing business, limiting or expanding permissible activities or affecting the competitive balance between banks and other financial intermediaries. Proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the operations and taxation of banks, bank holding companies and other financial intermediaries are frequently made in Congress, in the California legislature and before various bank regulatory agencies and other professional agencies. Changes in the laws, regulations or policies that impact the Company cannot necessarily be predicted, and they may have a material effect on the business and earnings of the Company.

     The Company and its subsidiaries, as of June 30, 2001, had 147 employees, including 83 sales managers and account executives and 19 professionals engaged in finance and credit. None of the Company's employees are represented by a labor union. The Company believes that its relations with its employees are satisfactory.

     At June 30, 2001, the Company and its subsidiaries occupied approximately 49,000 square feet of office space in Santa Ana, California leased from an unaffiliated party. The lease which covers the majority of the office space provides for monthly rental payments which average $88,673 from July 2001 through February 2003.

     The Company is sometimes named as a defendant in litigation relating to its business operations. Management does not expect the outcome of any existing suit to have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.

     None.

9

     The common stock of California First National Bancorp trades on the NASDAQ National Market System under the symbol CFNB. The following high and low closing sale prices for the periods shown reflect inter-dealer prices without retail markup, markdown or commissions and may not necessarily reflect actual transactions.

     The Company had approximately 55 stockholders of record and in excess of 500 beneficial owners as of September 21, 2001.

     After considering the Company's profitability, liquidity and future operating cash requirements, the Board of Directors authorized a regular quarterly cash dividend policy. For each of the fiscal years ended June 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999 the Company declared cash dividends totaling $.16 per common share.

10

The following table sets forth selected financial data and operating information of the Company and its subsidiaries. Common share data has been adjusted for the Company's common stock dividend effective October 17, 1997. Certain reclassifications have been made to the fiscal years prior to 1999 to conform with that year's financial statement presentation. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and notes thereto and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition contained herein.

11

     For most of the three fiscal years ending June 30, 2001, the Company's only active subsidiary was Amplicon, and therefore, the results for such years are almost exclusively related to its operations. The Company's revenues were generated from its leasing activities, the sale of leased property and interest income earned on its cash and liquid investments. Direct financing lease revenues include interest income earned on the Company's investment in lease receivables and residuals and gains recognized on the sale of leases in which the Company retains no significant continuing interest. Revenues from sales-type leases consist of the re-lease of off-lease property ("lease extensions") and new lease transactions that qualify as sales-type leases, generally where the fair value of the property subject to the lease differs from the Company's carrying cost. Revenues from operating leases generally involve the short-term rental of leased property.

     The volume of new lease transactions booked during the year ended June 30, 2001 was approximately $133 million, compared to $139 million in fiscal 2000 and $204 million during fiscal 1999. Of the new leases booked during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001, approximately 51% were structured as "true leases", where the Company owns the leased asset at the end of the term, while 49% were structured as "conditional sale leases", where the lessee generally may purchase the property at a predetermined minimum amount at the end of the term. For true lease transactions, the Company books a residual that is an estimate for accounting purposes of the fair value of the leased property at lease termination. The Company's estimates are reviewed continuously to ensure reasonableness. However, the amounts the Company may ultimately realize could differ from such estimated amounts.

     The Company's operating results are subject to quarterly and annual fluctuations resulting from a variety of factors, including the volume of new lease originations, the volume and profitability of leased property being re-marketed through re-lease or sale, variations in the mix of lease originations, the credit quality of its portfolio and economic conditions in general.

     The Company conducts its leasing business in a manner designed to minimize its risks. However, the assumption of risk is a key source of earnings in the leasing industry and the Company is subject to risks through its investment in lease transactions in process, investment in lease receivables held in its own portfolio and residual investments. The Company establishes reserves to cover such risks and regularly reviews their adequacy considering levels of non-performing leases, lessees' financial condition, leased property values as well as general economic conditions and credit quality indicators.

     REVENUES. Total revenues for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001 were $65,735,556, a decrease of $14,378,139, or 18%, from the prior year. This change was the result of a decrease of $10,250,564 in sales of leased property and a decrease of $4,134,106 in leasing revenues. The decrease in sales of leased property was primarily due to a lower volume of lease transactions coming to end of term during fiscal 2001 where the leased property was sold to the lessee or a third-party.

     Leasing revenues declined by $4,134,106, or 10%, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000. This reduction resulted from a decrease of $3,596,249, or 17%, in sales-type lease revenue to $18,089,457, and a decrease of $469,306 in operating lease revenue to $1,475,365. Direct financing revenue was essentially unchanged, reflecting the benefit from the larger lease portfolio held by the Company. The decrease in sales-type lease revenue can be attributed to a decrease in revenue related to new lease transactions structured as sales-type leases. The decrease in operating lease revenue can be attributed to a decrease in the volume of short-term lease renewals.

12

     GROSS PROFIT. Gross profit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001 decreased by $4,880,083, or 10%, to $44,498,541, compared to $49,378,624 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000. The decline in gross profit primarily reflects lower income recognized from the sale or re-lease of leased property, and lower income from new lease transactions, offset by higher interest income from the lease portfolio.

     SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001 increased by $1,880,057, or 11%, as compared to the prior year. This increase is the result of higher salary and benefit expenses incurred during the first nine months of the fiscal year and the impact of accruals related to legal and personnel matters.

     TAXES. The Company's tax rate was 38.5% for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, representing its estimated annual tax rates for each respective year.

     REVENUES. Total revenues for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000 were $80,113,695, an increase of $8,942,202, or 13%, from the prior year. This change was primarily the result of an increase of $11,395,526 in sales of leased property. The increase in sales of leased property was primarily due to a higher volume of lease transactions coming to end of term during fiscal 2000 where the leased property was sold to the lessee or a third-party. In addition, interest and other income for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000 increased by $2,551,826 to $4,555,613, as compared to $2,003,787 in the prior year, primarily as a result of the Company maintaining higher levels of interest bearing cash and cash equivalents throughout fiscal 2000.

     Leasing revenues declined by $5,005,150, or 11%, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999. This reduction resulted from a decrease of $6,694,100 in direct financing revenue to $18,738,101, offset by an increase of $695,571 in sales-type lease revenue to $21,685,706, and an increase of $993,379 in operating lease revenue to $1,944,671. The reduction in direct financing revenue can be attributed to lower interest income earned from a smaller investment in capital leases and lower revenue from the lower volume of new lease originations. The increase in sales-type lease revenue can be attributed to an increase in revenue from lease extensions, offset by a decrease in revenue related to new lease transactions structured as sales-type leases. The increase to operating lease revenue can be attributed to an increase in the volume of short-term lease renewals.

     GROSS PROFIT. Gross profit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000 increased by $384,865, or 1%, to $49,378,624, compared to $48,993,759 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999. Gross profit benefited from increased income recognized from leased property sales, a lower provision for credit losses and higher income from interest bearing cash and cash equivalents, which gains were offset by decreased income from direct financing leases.

     SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000 decreased by $68,590, or less than 1%, as compared to the prior year. This decrease is the result of lower salary and benefit expenses offset by increases in general office expenses.

     TAXES. The Company's tax rate was 38.5% for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2000 and 1999, representing its estimated annual tax rates for each respective year.

     The Company funds its operating activities through internally generated funds and nonrecourse debt. The Company does not purchase property until it has received a noncancelable lease from its customer. Capital expenditures for leased property purchases are financed in part by assigning certain base term lease payments to banks or other financial institutions. The assigned lease payments are discounted at fixed rates such that the lease payments are sufficient to fully amortize the aggregate outstanding debt. At June 30, 2001, the Company had outstanding nonrecourse debt aggregating $120,999,688 relating to property under capital leases. In the past, the Company has been able to obtain adequate nonrecourse funding commitments, and the Company believes it will be able to do so in the future.

13

     The Company also retains leases in its own portfolio rather than assigning the leases to financial institutions. Over the past two fiscal years, the Company has funded a significantly greater percentage of new lease transactions internally. During the fiscal year 2001, the Company's net investment in capital leases increased by $35,643,310. This increase is the result of a $46,140,212 increase in the Company's investment in lease receivables offset by a $10,496,902 reduction in the investment in estimated unguaranteed residual values. The increase in minimum lease payments receivable is primarily due to more new lease transactions being retained in the Company's own portfolio. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001, approximately 64.1% of the total dollar amount of new leases entered into by the Company were held in its own portfolio, compared to 20.3% during fiscal 2000.

     The Company often makes payments to purchase leased property prior to the commencement of the lease and assignment to other financial institutions. The disbursements for these lease transactions in process are generally made to facilitate the lessees' property implementation schedule. The lessee is contractually obligated by the lease to make rental payments directly to the Company during the period that the transaction is in process, and the lessee is generally obligated to reimburse the Company for all disbursements under certain circumstances. At June 30, 2001, the Company's investment in property acquired for transactions in process was $20,489,995, a decrease of $5,419,142 from the level at June 30, 2000. This decrease was primarily due to the lower volume of new lease transactions in process during fiscal 2001.

     In April 1999 and April 2001, the Board of Directors authorized management, at its discretion, to repurchase up to 600,000 and 1,000,000 shares of common stock, respectively. During the year ended June 30, 2001, the Company repurchased 252,500 shares at an aggregate cost of $2,327,882. As of September 21, 2001, 9,356 and 1,000,000 shares, respectively, remain available under these authorizations.

     At June 30, 2001, the Company's cash and cash equivalents were $59,088,544. Of this amount, $19,220,000 was held by the Bank and was not available to fund the Company's other operations. The need for cash used for operating activities will increase as the Company expands. The Company believes that existing cash balances, cash flow from operations, cash flows from its financing and investing activities, and assignments (on a nonrecourse basis) of anticipated lease payments will be sufficient to meet its foreseeable financing needs.

     Inflation has not had a significant impact upon the operations of the Company.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

     The Company's exposure to market risk related to interest rate risk is currently not material because it does not have any interest bearing recourse debt, and at June 30, 2001 the Bank's deposits were immaterial. Nonrecourse debt does not represent any interest rate risk to the Company because it is fully amortized through direct payments from lessees to the purchaser of the lease receivable. The Company's primary interest rate risk relates to its cash investments, because as interest rates decrease, interest income will decrease, and future lease rates from direct financing leases, which often are based on United States Treasury rates, will be lower. The only other interest rate risk the Company currently faces relates to the Bank's investment in federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell. This investment matures in less than ninety days and therefore the fair value approximates the carrying value. The interest rate on the investment was 3.98% at June 30, 2001.

     As the banking operations of the Company grow, the Company will be subject to increased interest rate risk. The Bank has an Asset/Liability Management Committee and policies established for managing its interest rate risk.

14

The following financial statements and supplementary financial information are included herein at the pages indicated below:

15

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of California First National Bancorp

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of California First National Bancorp and subsidiaries, formerly Amplicon, Inc., at June 30, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2001 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the consolidated financial statement schedules listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedules based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Orange County, California

August 3, 2001

16

The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these consolidated financial statements.

17

The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these consolidated financial statements.

18

The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these consolidated financial statements.

19

The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these consolidated financial statements.

20

Effective on May 22, 2001, Amplicon, Inc., a California corporation ("Amplicon"), reorganized itself as a holding company. In doing so, California First National Bancorp (the "Company"), became the holding company and Amplicon became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. California First National Bancorp and its subsidiaries have two principal lines of business, equipment leasing and banking. The Company leases high-technology and other capital assets to customers located throughout the United States. The Company is also engaged in the re-marketing of leased assets at lease expiration. The Company's banking subsidiary, California First National Bank, which commenced on May 23, 2001, is a FDIC-insured national bank that gathers deposits using the telephone, the Internet, and direct mail from a centralized location, and will lease capital assets to businesses and organizations and provide business loans to fund the purchase of assets leased by third parties. The activity of the Bank has been limited during the start-up phase of operations and consequently minimal deposits have been established and no leases have been booked as of June 30, 2001.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of California First National Bancorp and its wholly owned subsidiaries, California First National Bank and Amplicon. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

For purposes of these statements, cash and cash equivalents includes cash in banks, cash in demand deposit accounts, money market accounts and federal funds sold all of which have initial maturities of less than ninety days. Included in cash and cash equivalents was $19,220,000 that was held by the Bank and was not available to fund the Company's other operations.

The Company enters into purchases of securities under agreements to resell substantially identical securities. These agreements are classified as secured loans. Securities purchased under agreements to resell at June 30, 2001 consist of U.S. Treasury securities.

The amounts advanced under these agreements are reflected as assets in the consolidated balance sheet. It is the Company's policy to not take possession of securities purchased under agreements to resell. Agreements with third parties specify the Company's rights to request additional collateral, based on its monitoring of the fair value of the underlying securities on a daily basis. At June 30, 2001, these agreements matured within 90 days and no material amount of agreements to resell securities purchased was outstanding with any individual dealer.

The Company has estimated the fair value of its financial instruments in compliance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, "Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments" ("SFAS No. 107"). For cash, the book value is a reasonable estimate of fair value. For cash equivalents, the estimated fair value is based on respective market prices which was equal to book value for all periods presented. The fair value of the Company's net investment in capital leases is not a required disclosure under SFAS No. 107.

21

California First National Bancorp and Subsidiaries

The Company purchased an investment security during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001 which has been classified as held to maturity under the criteria established with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities". The Company has stated the investment at cost and does not have any unrealized gain or loss on this investment.

     Capital Leases

New lease transactions are generally structured as direct financing leases or sales-type leases. The re-lease of property that has come off lease may be accounted for as a sales-type lease or as an operating lease, depending on the terms of the re-lease. Leased property that comes off lease and is re-marketed through a sale to the lessee or a third party is accounted for as sales of leased property.

For capital leases that qualify as direct financing leases, the aggregate lease payments receivable and estimated unguaranteed residual value, if any, are recorded on the balance sheet net of unearned income as net investment in capital leases. The unearned income is recognized as direct financing revenue over the lease term on an internal rate of return method. There are no costs or expenses related to direct financing leases since leasing revenue is recorded on a net basis.

For capital leases that qualify as sales-type leases, the Company recognizes profit or loss at lease inception to the extent the fair value of the property leased differs from the Company's carrying value. The discounted value of the aggregate lease payments receivable is recorded as sales-type lease revenue. The property cost, less the discounted value of the residual, if any, and any initial direct costs are recorded as sales-type lease costs. For balance sheet purposes, the aggregate lease payments receivable, and estimated unguaranteed residual value, if any, are recorded on the balance sheet net of unearned income as net investment in capital leases. Unearned income is recognized as direct financing revenue over the lease term on an internal rate of return method.

The estimated unguaranteed residual value is an estimate for accounting purposes of the fair value of the lease property at lease termination. The estimates are reviewed continuously to ensure reasonableness, however the amounts the Company may ultimately realize could differ from the estimated amounts.

The Company often assigns, on a nonrecourse basis, the minimum lease payments receivable to financial institutions at fixed interest rates. When leases are assigned to financial institutions, without recourse, the discounted value of the minimum lease payments receivable is recategorized on the balance sheet as discounted lease rentals assigned to lenders. The related obligations resulting from the discounting of the leases are recorded as nonrecourse debt. The unearned income related to the lease is reduced by the interest expense from the nonrecourse debt. In the event of default by a lessee, the lender has a first lien against the underlying leased property with no further recourse against the Company. If this occurs, the Company may not realize its residual investment in the leased property.

A portion of the Company's selling, general and administrative costs directly related to originating direct financing lease transactions is deferred as an increase to direct financing revenue and amortized over the lease term as a reduction to direct financing revenue utilizing the effective interest method.

     Operating Leases

Lease contracts which do not meet the criteria of capital leases are accounted for as operating leases. Property on operating leases is recorded at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the lease term to the estimated residual value at the termination of the lease. Rental income is recorded monthly or quarterly when due. Selling costs directly associated with the operating leases are deferred and amortized over the lease term.

The reserve for doubtful accounts and residual valuation allowance ("reserve") is periodically reviewed for adequacy considering levels of past due leases and nonperforming assets, lessees' financial condition, leased property values as well as general economic conditions and credit quality indicators. The need for reserves is subject to future events, which by their nature are uncertain. Therefore, changes in economic conditions or other events affecting specific lessees or industries may necessitate additions or deductions to the reserve for doubtful accounts or the residual valuation allowance.

Property acquired for transactions in process primarily represents partial deliveries of property which the lessee has accepted on in-process lease transactions. Such amounts are stated at cost.

Earnings Per Share

Basic net income per share is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net income per share includes the effect of the potential shares outstanding, including dilutive stock options, using the treasury stock method. The following table reconciles the components of the basic net income per share calculation to diluted net income per share.

On June 15, 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (SFAS No. 133). SFAS No. 133 requires that all derivative instruments be recorded on the balance sheet at their fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives will be recorded each period in current earnings or other comprehensive income, depending on whether a derivative is designated as part of a hedge transaction and, if it is, the type of hedge transaction. The Company has not had any activity as defined in SFAS No. 133. The accounting requirements of SFAS No. 133 will be adopted for any future transactions entered into by the Company which would meet the criteria established under the statement.

23

In September 2000, the FASB issued SFAS No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities." (SFAS No 140). SFAS No. 140 replaces SFAS No. 125, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities," (SFAS No. 125). SFAS No. 140 revises criteria for accounting for securitizations, other financial-asset transfers and collateral and introduces new disclosures, but otherwise carries forward most of the provisions of SFAS No. 125, without amendment. The accounting requirements of SFAS No. 140 are effective for covered transactions occurring after March 31, 2001, and must be applied prospectively. The disclosure requirements for SFAS No. 140 are for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2000, and comparative disclosures for prior periods are not required. The Company does not expect the impact of the accounting requirements of SFAS No. 140 to be material to its financial position or results of operations.

On July 20, 2001, FASB issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations" ("SFAS 141") and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("SFAS 142"). SFAS 141 addresses financial accounting and reporting for business combinations. All business combinations in the scope of SFAS 141 are to be accounted for under the purchase method. The provisions of SFAS 141 apply to all business combinations initiated or closed after June 30, 2001. SFAS 142 addresses financial accounting and reporting for goodwill and other intangible assets. SFAS 142 addresses how goodwill and other intangible assets should be accounted for in the financial statements and provides that goodwill and intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001, will be subject immediately to the nonamortization and amortization provisions of SFAS 142. The adoption of SFAS 141 and SFAS 142 will have no impact on the Company.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the fiscal 1999 financial statements to conform with the presentation of the fiscal 2000 and 2001 financial statements.

Note 2 - Receivables:

The Company's net receivables consist of the following:

The Company's net investment in capital leases consists of the following:

The minimum lease payments receivable and estimated unguaranteed residual value are discounted using the internal rate of return method related to each specific capital lease. Unearned income includes the offset of initial direct costs of $5,530,756 and $5,881,706 at June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

At June 30, 2001, a summary of the installments due on minimum lease payments receivable and the expected maturity of the Company's estimated unguaranteed residual value, net of allowances, is as follows:

Included with unearned income on the estimated unguaranteed residual value is unearned income from assigned leases.

Nonrecourse debt, which relates to the discounting of capital lease receivables, bears interest at rates ranging from 5.85% to 12.50%. Maturities of such obligations at June 30, 2001 are as follows:

At June 30, 2001, deferred interest expense of $11,256,550 is amortized against direct financing revenues related to the Company's discounted lease rentals assigned to lenders of $120,999,688 using the effective yield method.

The Company accounts for its income taxes under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." Among other provisions, this standard requires deferred tax balances to be determined using the enacted income tax rate for the years in which taxes will be paid or refunds received. From time to time, the Company is audited by various governmental taxing authorities. The Company believes that its accrual for income taxes is adequate for adjustments, if any, which may result from these examinations.

The provision for income taxes is summarized as follows:

Deferred taxes result principally from the method of recording lease income on capital leases and depreciation methods for tax reporting, which differ from financial statement reporting.

Deferred income tax liabilities (assets) are comprised of the following:

At June 30, 2001 the Company had an income taxes receivable balance of $8,197,721.

The sources of differences between the federal statutory income tax rate and the Company's effective tax rate are as follows:

26

In September 1986, the Board of Directors and stockholders approved an increase in the number of authorized shares of Common Stock to 20,000,000. The Board of Directors and stockholders further authorized the issuance of 2,500,000 shares of preferred stock, from time to time, in one or more series and to fix the voting powers, designations, preferences and the relative participating, optional or other rights, if any, of any wholly unissued series of preferred stock.

In August 1985, the Company's stockholders approved a Stock Option Plan (the "1985 Plan"), which, as amended, provided that stock options would be granted to officers, employees, consultants and other persons who had made major contributions toward the growth and development of the Company. Stock options that were granted entitled the recipient to purchase shares of the Company's common stock at prices greater than, equal to or less than the estimated fair market value at the date of the grant. Under the 1985 Plan, stock options become exercisable over a three or five year period, commencing with the first anniversary of the date of the grant, and expire ten years from the date of the grant. The Company had reserved 1,300,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the 1985 Plan. No further grants will be made under the 1985 Plan.

In November 1995, the Company's stockholders approved the 1995 Equity Participation Plan (the "1995 Plan") which succeeds the 1985 Plan. The 1995 Plan provides for the granting of options, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights ("SARs") to key employees, directors and consultants of the Company. Under the 1995 Plan, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options or SARs, or upon the vesting of restricted stock awards, is 1,000,000. The maximum number of available shares of Common Stock will increase by an amount equal to 1% of the total number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock as of June 30 of the fiscal year immediately preceding such fiscal year. Each grant or issuance under the 1995 Plan will be set forth in a separate agreement and will indicate, as determined by the stock option committee, the type, terms, vesting period and conditions of the award.

The following table summarizes the activity in the 1985 and 1995 Plans for the periods indicated:

27

The Company accounts for these Plans under APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stocks Issued to Employees," under which no compensation cost has been recognized. Had compensation cost for these plans been determined consistent with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS No. 123"), the Company's net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the following proforma amounts:

Since the FASB No. 123 method of accounting has not been applied to options granted prior to July 1, 1995, the resulting proforma compensation cost may not be indicative of that to be expected in future periods.

The fair value of each grant is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2001, 2000 and 1999.

The Company leases its corporate offices under operating leases which expire in fiscal 2002 and 2003. Rent expense was $929,131 (2001), $972,276, (2000) and $995,075 (1999).

28

Future minimum lease payments under the operating leases are as follows:

The Company is party to various legal actions and administrative proceedings and subject to various claims arising out of the Company's normal business activities. Management does not expect the outcome of any of these matters, individually and in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Employees of the Company may participate in a voluntary defined contribution plan (the "401K Plan") qualified under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Under the 401K Plan, employees who have met certain age and service requirements may contribute up to a certain percentage of their compensation. The Company has made contributions during the years ended June 30, 2001, 2000, and 1999 of $68,928, $118,521 and $105,379, respectively.

Note 7- Segment Reporting:

Effective May 23, 2001, the Company has two reportable segments, banking and leasing. For all periods prior thereto, there was only one segment, leasing. With only five and one-half weeks of operations, activity within the banking segment during fiscal 2001 was very limited. The assets of the bank, consisting primarily of the original capital invested by the Company, totaled $20,298,516 at June 30, 2001, with reportable net revenues for fiscal 2001 of $90,024 and net income of $5,213. All other assets of the Company were held by its leasing subsidiary, Amplicon, and all other revenue and net income of the Company was derived from the leasing operations.

Note 8- Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited):

Summarized quarterly financial data for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 is as follows:

30

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than October 27, 2001 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than October 27, 2001 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than October 27, 2001 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than October 27, 2001 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

31

(a)           List of documents filed as part of this Report

               (1) Financial Statements

                    All financial statements of the Registrant as set forth under Part II
                    Item 8 of this report on Form 10-K

               (2) Financial Statement Schedules:

All other schedules are omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required or because all material information required to be reported is included in the financial statements and notes thereto.

               (3) Exhibits:

                    See Index to Exhibits filed as part of this Form 10-K                                                                      35-37

(b)           Reports on Form 8-K

There were two reports on Form 8-K filed during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001. The first report filed on May 25, 2001 was regarding the reorganization of Amplicon, Inc. as a bank holding company to become California First National Bancorp, and the purchase of 100% of the stock of California First National Bank. The second report filed on June 8, 2001 was regarding the appointment of Danilo Cacciamatta as an outside director of the Board of Directors of California First National Bancorp.

32

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

CALIFORNIA FIRST NATIONAL BANCORP

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each person whose signature appears below hereby authorizes each of Patrick E. Paddon, S. Leslie Jewett and Glen T. Tsuma as attorney-in-fact to sign on his behalf, individually in each capacity stated below, and to file all amendments and/or supplements to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

33