Back to GetFilings.com



FORM 10-K

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.

ý ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____________________ to ____________________

Commission file number 0-14714

ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Tennessee
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

62-0873631
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

P. O. Box 72787, 4101 Jerome Avenue, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37407
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (423) 867-4210

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $.20 par value

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No ____

(Form 10-K Cover Page - Continued)

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]

 

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $187,698,000 based upon the closing sales price reported by the NASDAQ National Market on March 15, 2001, using beneficial ownership of stock rules adopted pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to exclude voting stock owned by all directors and executive officers of the registrant, some of whom may not be held to be affiliates upon judicial determination .

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS)

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

As of March 15, 2001

Common Stock, par value $.20 - 19,331,567 shares

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the following documents have been incorporated by reference into the Parts of this Annual Report on Form 10-K indicated:

Document
Proxy Statement relating to Annual Meeting of Shareholdersto be held on April 25, 2001

Form 10-K
Part III

ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.

2000 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Page

Item 1. Business

1

Item 2. Properties

16

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

18

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

18

Executive Officers of the Registrant

19

 

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters

20

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

21

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

21

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

21

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

21

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

21

 

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

21

Item 11. Executive Compensation

21

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

21

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

22

 

PART IV

Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K

22

 

Appendix A

A-1

 

Signatures

-iii-
 

PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS
General

Astec Industries, Inc. (the "Company") is a Tennessee corporation, which was incorporated in 1972. The Company designs, engineers, manufactures, markets, and finances equipment and components used primarily in road building and related construction activities. The Company's products are used in each phase of road building, from quarrying and crushing the aggregate to application of the road surface. In addition, the Company is partner in a joint venture that makes testing and sampling equipment for the asphalt mix and aggregate processing industries. The Company also manufactures certain equipment and components unrelated to road construction, including trenching, auger boring, directional drilling, environmental remediation and industrial heat transfer equipment. The Company holds 89 United States and 69 foreign patents, has 50 patent applications pending, and has been responsible for many technological and engineering innovations in the industry. The Company's products are marketed both domestically and internationally. In addition to plant and equipment sales, the Company manufactures and sells replacement parts for equipment in each of its product lines. The distribution and sale of replacement parts is an integral part of the Company's business.

The Company's fourteen manufacturing subsidiaries are: (i) Breaker Technology Ltd., which designs, manufactures and markets rock breaking and processing equipment and utility vehicles for mining; (ii) Johnson Crushers International, Inc., which designs, manufactures and markets portable and stationary aggregate and ore processing equipment; (iii) Kolberg-Pioneer, Inc., which designs, manufactures and markets aggregate processing equipment for the crushed stone, manufactured sand, recycle, top soil and remediation markets; (iv) Osborn Engineered Products SA (Pty) Ltd., which designs, manufactures and markets crushers, vibratory screening equipment and turnkey plants and mills; (v) Production Engineered Products, Inc., which designs, manufactures and markets high-frequency vibrating screens for sand and gravel and asphalt operations; (vi) Superior Industries of Morris, Inc., which designs, manufactures and markets conveyors and idlers; (vii) Telsmith, Inc., which designs, manufactures and markets aggregate processing equipment for the production and classification of sand, gravel, and crushed stone for road and other construction applications; (viii) Astec, Inc., which designs, manufactures and markets hot-mix asphalt plants, soil purification and related components; (ix) CEI Enterprises, Inc., which designs, manufactures and markets heat transfer equipment and polymer and rubber blending systems for the hot-mix asphalt industry; (x) Heatec, Inc., which designs, manufactures and markets thermal fluid heaters, asphalt heaters, polymer and rubber blending systems and other heat transfer equipment used in the Company's asphalt mixing plants and in other industries; (xi) American Augers, Inc., which designs, manufactures and markets auger boring and directional drilling equipment; (xii) Trencor, Inc., which designs, manufactures and markets chain and wheel trenching equipment and excavating equipment; (xiii) Carlson Paving Products, Inc., which designs, manufacturers and markets asphalt paver screeds; and (xiv) Roadtec, Inc., which designs, manufactures and markets milling machines used to recycle asphalt and concrete, asphalt paving equipment and material transfer vehicles.

Astec Financial Services, Inc. ("AFS") was formed in June 1996 as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company to provide a wide range of financing products for leasing or acquiring the Company's equipment. AFS, a captive finance company, is dedicated to working with the Company's subsidiaries and their customers in arranging financing for the Company's equipment. AFS provides loans, operating leases, floor plans for dealers, fleet rental plans, and other financing plans to meet the needs of the industry.

Astec Systems, Inc. was formed late in 2000 in response to market demand for a new generation of modular aggregate processing plants. Astec Systems is not a manufacturing entity but designs and markets modular systems using the engineering capabilities of and equipment manufactured by the Aggregate and Mining Group and the construction expertise of Astec, Inc. As of December 31, 2000, three modular aggregate processing plants were under construction.

The Company is a 50% shareholder of Pavement Technology, Inc. ("PTI"). PTI manufactures innovative testing and sampling equipment and sells complete asphalt mix design laboratories assembled from PTI and third-party equipment. The pavement analyzer technology has captured the interest of state departments of transportation, universities and contractors as a new standard for measuring pavement performance of hot-mix asphalt. The pavement technology product line enhances the services and equipment the Company is able to provide to its customers.

The Company's strategy is to be the low-cost producer in each of its product lines while continuing to develop innovative new products and provide first class service for its customers. Management believes that the Company is the technological innovator in the markets in which it operates and is well positioned to capitalize on the need to rebuild and enhance roadway infrastructure, both in the United States and abroad.

Segment Reporting

In 1998, the Company adopted SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, which changed the way the Company reported information about its operating segments. The information below conforms to current presentation requirements.

The Company's business units have separate management teams and offer different products and services. The business units have been aggregated into four reportable business segments based upon the nature of the product or services produced, the type of customer for the products and the nature of the production process. The reportable business segments are (i) Asphalt Group, (ii) Aggregate and Mining Group, (iii) Mobile Asphalt Paving Group and (iv) Underground Group. All remaining companies are included in the "Other Business Units" category for reporting.

Financial information in connection with the Company's financial reporting for segments of a business under SFAS 131 is included in Note 12 to "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Operations by Industry Segment and Geographic Area," appearing at Page A-20 of this report.

Asphalt Group

The Asphalt Group segment is made up of three business units, Astec, Inc., Heatec, Inc. and CEI Enterprises, Inc. These business units design, manufacture and market a complete line of asphalt plants and related components, heating and heat transfer processing equipment and storage tanks for the asphalt paving and other non-related industries.

Products

Astec, Inc. designs, engineers, manufactures and markets a complete line of portable, stationary and relocatable hot-mix asphalt plants and related components under the ASTEC® trademark. An asphalt mixing plant typically consists of heating and storage equipment for liquid asphalt (manufactured by Heatec), cold feed bins for storing aggregates, a drum mixer for drying, heating and mixing, a baghouse composed of air filters and other pollution control devices, hot storage bins or silos for temporary storage of hot-mix asphalt and a control house. The Company introduced the concept of plant portability in 1979. Its current generation of portable asphalt plants is marketed as the Six PackTM and consists of six portable components, which can be disassembled, moved to the construction site and reassembled, which reduces relocation expenses. Plant portability represents an industry innovation developed and successfully marketed by the Company. In 1996, an improved version of the Six PackTM plant was developed, making it considerably easier to assemble and capable of being separated into movable parts for transport without the use of a crane. This design eliminated the use of cranes for disassembly or erection. The enhanced version of the Six PackTM, known as the Turbo Six PackTM, is a highly portable plant which is especially useful in less populated areas where plants must be moved from job to job.

The components in Astec's asphalt mixing plants are fully automated and use microprocessor-based control systems for efficient operation. The plants are manufactured to meet or exceed federal and state clean air standards.

The Company has also developed specialized asphalt recycling equipment for use with its hot-mix asphalt plants. Many of its existing products are suited for blending, vaporizing, drying and incinerating contaminated products. As a result, Astec has developed a line of thermal purification equipment for the remediation of petroleum-contaminated soil.

Heatec, Inc. designs, engineers, manufactures and markets a variety of thermal fluid heaters, process heaters, waste heat recovery equipment, liquid storage systems and polymer and rubber blending systems under the HEATEC® trademark. For the construction industry, Heatec manufactures a complete line of asphalt heating and storage equipment to serve the hot-mix asphalt industry and water heaters for concrete plants. In addition, Heatec builds a wide variety of industrial heaters to fit a broad range of applications, including equipment for emulsion plants, roofing material plants, refineries, chemical processing, rubber plants and the agribusiness. Heatec has the technical staff to custom design heating systems and has systems operating as large as 50,000,000 BTU's per hour.

CEI Enterprises, Inc. ("CEI"), designs, engineers, manufactures and markets heating equipment and storage tanks for the asphalt paving industry and rubber and polymer blending systems. CEI's heating equipment uses hot oil, direct fired or electric heating processes. CEI's equipment includes portable and stationary tank models with capacities up to 35,000 gallons each.

Marketing

The Company markets its hot-mix asphalt and heat transfer products both domestically and internationally. The principal purchasers of asphalt and related equipment include highway contractors and foreign and domestic governmental agencies. Asphalt equipment is sold directly to its customers with domestic and international sales departments. Outside dealers are not used to market hot-mix asphalt products, but agents are used to market asphalt plants and their components internationally.

Heatec equipment is marketed through both direct sales and dealer sales. Manufacturers' representatives sell heating products for applications in industries other than the asphalt industry. CEI equipment is marketed only through direct sales. Direct sales employees are paid salaries and are generally entitled to commissions after obtaining certain sales quotas.

Raw Materials

Raw materials used in the manufacture of products include carbon steel and various types of alloy steel, which are normally purchased from distributors. Raw materials for manufacturing are readily available. Some steel is delivered on a "just-in-time" arrangement from the supplier to reduce inventory requirements at the manufacturing facilities.

Competition

This industry segment faces strong competition in price, service and product performance and competes with both large publicly held companies with resources significantly greater than those of the Company and with various smaller manufacturers. Hot-mix asphalt plant competitors include CMI Corporation; Cedarapids, Inc., a subsidiary of Terex Corporation; and Gencor Industries, Inc. The market for the Company's heat transfer equipment is diverse because of the multiple applications for such equipment. Competitors for heating equipment include Gencor/Hyway Heat Systems, American Heating, Gentec and GTS Energy Systems.

Employees

At December 31, 2000, the Asphalt Group segment employed 1,114 individuals, of which, 913 were engaged in manufacturing, 80 in engineering and 121 in selling, general and administrative functions.

Backlog

The backlog for the hot-mix asphalt and heat transfer equipment at December 31, 2000 and 1999 was approximately $41,203,000 and $59,350,000, respectively.

Aggregate and Mining Group

The Company's Aggregate and Mining Group is comprised of eight business units focused on the aggregate, metallic mining and recycle markets. Seven of the subsidiaries achieve their strength by distributing products into niche markets and drawing on the advantages of brand recognition in the global market. These business units are Breaker Technology Ltd., Johnson Crushers International, Inc., Kolberg-Pioneer, Inc., Osborn Engineered Products, SA (Pty) Ltd., Production Engineered Products, Inc., Superior Industries of Morris, Inc., and Telsmith, Inc. The eighth subsidiary, Astec Systems, Inc., designs and markets aggregate processing systems comprised of equipment manufactured by the other seven subsidiaries in this segment and from selected equipment of the Asphalt Group.

Products

Founded in 1906, Telsmith, Inc. is the oldest subsidiary of the group. The primary markets served under the TELSMITH® trade name are the aggregate and metallic mining industries. Telsmith's core products are cone (Gyrasphere â ), jaw and impact crushers, which are recognized for their reliability. A wide range of vibrating feeders for primary crushing operations are complemented with large vibrating screens for the difficult scalping applications and sizing screens to handle the most rigorous specifications of finished aggregate products. Telsmith offers all their products as portables that are easily relocated to quarry sites to minimize the costs of transporting crushed stone. Equipment furnished by Telsmith can be purchased as individual components, as portable plants for flexibility or as completely engineered systems for both portable and stationary applications.

The stringent demands for quality aggregate to meet the specifications of the "Superpave" asphalt mixes has led to Telsmith's development of the Silver Bullet™ narrow band cone crusher, which provides unparalleled results in producing a cubical product, as well as enhancing overall machine productivity.

In metallic mining operations, TELSMITH® equipment is used in primary crushing stages after the material has been blasted from the deposit. Secondary and tertiary crushing equipment, as well as vibrating screens, are employed in systems to reduce the material down to sizes for grinding mill feed or leech bed processes.

In 1994, Telsmith received ISO 9001 certification, the international standard of quality assurance in the design, development, production, installation and servicing of their products. This designation is recognition of the quality of Telsmith products and services in the worldwide marketplace.

Kolberg-Pioneer, Inc. ("KPI") designs, manufactures and supports a complete line of aggregate processing equipment for the sand and gravel, mining, quarrying and concrete recycling markets. KPI manufactures the well-known Pioneer ® and Kolberg® product lines.

Pioneer® products include a complete line of primary, secondary, tertiary and quaternary crushers, including jaws, cones, horizontal shaft impactors, vertical shaft impactors and roll crushers. Kolberg-Pioneer rock crushers are used by mining, quarrying and sand and gravel producers to crush oversized aggregate to salable size. Vibrating feeders are used to convey aggregate to the primary crusher operations. The incorporation of vibrating grizzly feeders and vibrating scalpers allows small material to bypass the primary crusher.

Kolberg® sand classifying and washing equipment is relied upon to clean, segregate and re-blend deposits to meet the size specifications for critical applications. The product line includes fine and coarse material washers, log washers, blade mills and sand classifying tanks. Screening plants are available in both stationary and highly portable models, and are complemented by a full line of radial stacking and overland belt conveyors.

Kolberg-Pioneer manufactures belt conveyors designed to move or store aggregate and other bulk materials, typically in radial cone-shaped stockpiles. Models offered include road portable, telescoping stationary and overland styles.

In addition, Kolberg-Pioneer manufactures pugmills, which are highly efficient homogenous mixing chambers consisting of twin shafts with timed, overlapping paddles used for soil remediation, cement-treated base and cold-mix asphalt. Pugmills are typically combined with either a bulk storage silo for introducing dry additives or with a pump for liquids.

Production Engineered Products, Inc. ("PEP") designs, manufactures and markets high-frequency vibrating screens for sand and gravel customers, as well as customers engaged in asphalt production. In addition, they incorporate the high-frequency screens into portable crushing and screening plants servicing the aggregate and industrial markets. High-frequency screens are adept in separating out small mesh particles where conventional screens are not ideally suited.

PEP's latest product development, the highly successful "Fold'n Go" plant, incorporates features that allow aggregate producers to efficiently manufacture asphalt chips and manufactured sand. This unit, with its on-plant stockpiling conveyors and its own power source, is totally self-contained.

Johnson Crushers International, Inc. ("JCI") designs, manufactures and distributes portable and stationary aggregate and ore processing equipment. This equipment is used in the aggregate, mining and recycle industries. JCI's principal products are cone crushers, three-shaft horizontal screens, portable plants, and replacement parts for competitive equipment. JCI offers completely re-manufactured cone crushers and screens from its service repair facility.

JCI cone crushers are used primarily in secondary and tertiary crushing applications, and come in both manual and remotely adjusted models. Horizontal screens are low-profile machines for use primarily in portable applications. They are used to separate aggregate materials by sizes. Portable plants combine various configurations of cone crushers, horizontal screens and conveyors mounted on tow-away chassis. Because transportation costs are high, producers use portable equipment to operate nearer to their job sites. Portable plants allow the aggregate producers to quickly and efficiently move their equipment from one location to another.

Superior Industries of Morris, Inc. designs and manufactures a complete line of portable and stationary conveyors. Its portable line includes 150-foot telescoping stacking conveyors, patented FD series axle assemblies and stationary conveyor systems for all types of bulk material handling, including stockpiling and overland transfer. Superior's product line also includes screening plants, wash plants, fine material washers and custom-built crushing plants. Superior's component division builds a complete line of conveyor idlers and maintains ISO 9001 certification for quality assurance.

Breaker Technology Ltd. ("BTL") designs, manufactures and markets hydraulic rock breaker systems for the aggregate, mining and recycling industries. They also design and manufacture a complete line of four-wheel drive articulated utility vehicles for underground mines and quarries.

In addition to the quarry and mining industries, BTL designs, manufactures and markets a complete line of hydraulic attachments for the North American construction and demolition markets. These attachments are sold on a variety of equipment including excavators, backhoe loaders, wheel loaders, and skid steer loaders. They include hydraulic breakers and compactors for the construction market and include crushers, pulverizers, shears and multi-processors for the demolition market.

BTL offers an extensive aftermarket sales and service program through a highly qualified and trained dealer network.

Osborn Engineered Products, SA (Pty) Ltd. ("Osborn") designs, manufactures and markets a complete line of bulk material handling and minerals processing plants and equipment. This equipment is used in the aggregate, mineral mining, metallic mining and recycle industries. Osborn has been a licensee of Telsmith's technology for over fifty years. In addition to the Telsmith line of equipment, Osborn offers rotary and roll crushers, mills, portable crushing and screening plants, conveyor systems and idlers, and a line of IFE screens.

Astec Systems, Inc. was formed late in 2000 in response to market demand for a new generation of modular aggregate processing plants. Astec Systems is not a manufacturing entity but designs and markets modular systems using the engineering capabilities of and equipment manufactured by the Aggregate and Mining Group and the construction expertise of Astec, Inc. As of December 31, 2000, three modular aggregate processing plants were under construction.

Marketing

Aggregate processing and mining equipment is marketed by 122 direct sales employees, approximately 516 independent domestic distributors and approximately 74 independent international distributors. The principal purchasers of aggregate processing equipment include highway and heavy equipment contractors, open mine operators, quarry operators and foreign and domestic governmental agencies.

Raw Materials

Raw materials used in the manufacture of products include carbon steel and various types of alloy steel, which are normally purchased from distributors. Raw materials for manufacturing are readily available. Breaker Technology purchases rock breakers under a long-term purchasing contract from a Japanese supplier and also purchases crushers from an Italian supplier. Both the Japanese and Italian suppliers have sufficient capacity to meet the Company's anticipated demand; however, alternative suppliers exist for both of these components should any supply disruptions occur.

Competition

The Aggregate and Mining Group faces strong competition in price, service and product performance. Aggregate processing and mining equipment competitors include Metso (Nordberg); Svedala Industri AB; Cedarapids, Inc.; Powerscreen and Finley, subsidiaries of Terex Corporation; Deister; Eagle Iron Works; and other smaller manufacturers, both domestic and international.

Employees

At December 31, 2000, the Aggregate and Mining Group segment employed 1,444 individuals, of which 988 were engaged in manufacturing, 128 in engineering and support functions, and 328 in selling, general and administrative functions.

Backlog

At December 31, 2000 and 1999, the backlog for the Aggregate and Mining Group was approximately $43,882,000 and $33,034,000, respectively. The 1999 backlog is restated for the acquisition of Osborn.

Mobile Asphalt Paving Group

The Mobile Asphalt Paving Group is comprised of Roadtec, Inc. and Carlson Paving Products, Inc. ("Carlson"). Roadtec designs, engineers, manufactures and markets asphalt pavers, material transfer vehicles and milling machines. Carlson designs and manufactures asphalt paver screeds that attach to the asphalt paver to control the width and depth of the asphalt as it is applied to the roadbed.

Products

Roadtec's patented Shuttle Buggy® is a mobile, self-propelled material transfer vehicle which allows continuous paving by separating truck unloading from the paving process while remixing the asphalt. A typical asphalt paver must stop paving to permit truck unloading of asphalt mix. By permitting continuous paving, the Shuttle Buggy® allows the asphalt paver to produce a smoother road surface. As a result of the pavement smoothness achieved with this machine, certain states are now requiring the use of the Shuttle Buggy®. Recent studies using infrared technology have revealed problems caused by differential cooling of the hot-mix during hauling. The Shuttle Buggy® remixes the material to a uniform temperature and gradation, thus eliminating these problems.

Asphalt pavers are used in the application of hot-mix asphalt to the road surface. Roadtec pavers have been designed to minimize maintenance costs while exceeding road surface smoothness requirements. Roadtec also manufactures a paver model that is designed for use with the material transfer vehicle described above.

Roadtec milling machines are designed to remove old asphalt from the road surface before new asphalt mix is applied. They are manufactured with a simplified control system, wide conveyors, direct drives and a wide range of horsepower and cutting capabilities to provide versatility in product application. Additional upgrades and options are available to enhance the products and their capabilities.

Carlson's patented screeds are part of the asphalt paving machine that lays asphalt on the roadbed at a desired thickness and width, while smoothing and compacting the surface. Carlson screeds can be configured to fit many types of asphalt paving machines. A Carlson screed uses a hydraulic powered generator to electrify elements that heat a screed plate so that asphalt will not stick to it while paving. The generator is also available to power tools or lights for night paving. Available options allow extended paving widths and the addition of a curb on the road edge.

Marketing

Mobile Asphalt Paving equipment is marketed both domestically and internationally to highway and heavy equipment contractors, utility contractors and foreign and domestic governmental agencies. Mobile construction equipment is marketed both directly and through dealers. This segment employs 22 direct sales staff, 29 foreign independent distributors and 1 domestic independent distributor.

Raw Materials

Raw materials used in the manufacture of products include carbon steel and various types of alloy steel, which are normally purchased from steel mills and other sources. Raw materials for manufacturing are readily available.

Competition

The Mobile Asphalt Paving Group segment faces strong competition in price, service and performance. Paving equipment and screed competitors include Caterpillar Paving Products, Inc., a subsidiary of Caterpillar, Inc.; Blaw-Knox Construction Equipment Company, a subsidiary of Ingersoll-Rand Company; Cedarapids, Inc., a subsidiary of Terex Corporation; and Dynapac, a subsidiary of Svedala. The segment's milling machine equipment competitors include CMI Corporation; Caterpillar, Inc.; and Wirtgen America, Inc.

Employees

At December 31, 2000, the Mobile Asphalt Paving Group segment employed 331 individuals, of which, 237 were engaged in manufacturing, 21 in engineering and support functions, and 73 in selling, general and administrative functions.

Backlog

The backlog for the Mobile Asphalt Paving Group segment at December 31, 2000 and 1999 was approximately $2,131,000 and $1,925,000, respectively. The 1999 backlog is restated for the acquisition of Carlson.

Underground Group

The Underground Group segment consists of Trencor, Inc. and American Augers, Inc. This segment combines the marketing of the American Augers and Trencor products to be the innovative leader in both trenchless and trencher technology to install utilities and pipeline worldwide. In the previous year, Trencor and American Augers were included in the Other Business Units segment.

Products

Trencor, Inc. designs, engineers, manufactures and markets chain and wheel trenching equipment, canal excavators, rock saws, material processors and road miners.

With the ability to cut a trench through solid rock in a single pass, Trencor trenching equipment is among the toughest in the world. Utilizing a unique mechanical power train, Trencor machines are used to trench pipelines, lay fiber optic cable, cut irrigation ditches, insert highway drainage materials, and more. Trencor also makes foundation trenchers used in areas where drilling and blasting are prohibited. Trencor recently redesigned their line of hydrostatic side-shift trenchers to complement the heavy-duty hydrostatic rock saws used to install the rapidly growing worldwide network of fiber optic cable.

Trencor canal excavators are used to make finished and trimmed trapezoidal canal excavations within close tolerances primarily for irrigation systems. The rock saw is used to lay water and gas lines, fiber optic cable, and for constructing highway drainage systems, among other applications.

Four Road Miner® models are available with an attachment that allows them to cut a path up to twelve and a half feet wide and five feet deep on a single pass. The Road Miner® has applications in the road construction industry and in mining and aggregate processing operations.

American Augers, Inc. designs, manufactures, markets and sells a wide range of trenchless equipment. Today, American Augers is one of the largest manufacturers of auger boring machines in the world, designing and engineering state-of-the-art boring machines, directional drills and fluid/mud systems used in the underground construction or trenchless market. Augers plans to introduce three new directional drills during 2001, along with several new fluid/mud systems, giving it one of the broadest product lines in the industry. American Augers has over 2,000 customers throughout the world that operate in the sewer, power, fiber-optic telecommunication, electric, oil and gas, and water industries.

Marketing

Trencor and American Augers market their products domestically through direct sales representatives and internationally through both direct sales and independent dealers and sales agents.

Raw Materials

American Augers maintains excellent relationships with its suppliers and has experienced minimal turnover. The purchasing group has developed partnering relationships with many of the company's key vendors to improve just-in-time delivery and thus lower inventory. Steel is the predominant raw material used to manufacture Trencor's and American Augers' products. Components used are engines, hydraulic motors and pumps, gearboxes, power transmissions and electronics systems.

Competition

Competition for sales of trenching, excavating, auger boring, directional drilling, and fluid/mud equipment includes Charles Machine Works (Ditch Witch); J.I. Case; Vermeer and other smaller custom manufacturers.

Employees

At December 31, 2000, the Underground Group segment employed 368 individuals, of which, 264 were engaged in manufacturing, 35 in engineering and 69 in selling, general and administrative functions.

Backlog

The backlog for the Underground Group segment at December 31, 2000 and 1999 was approximately $2,336,000 and $2,263,000, respectively.

Other Business Units

This category consists of the Company's three other business units that do not meet the requirements for separate disclosure as an operating segment. These other operating units include Astec Financial Services, Inc., Astec Transportation, Inc. and the parent company Astec Industries, Inc. Revenues in this category are derived predominantly from operating leases and other financial products offered by Astec Financial Services, Inc., the Company's finance subsidiary.

Competition

Competitors of the captive finance company include General Electric Credit Corporation; The CIT Group; Associates First Capital Corporation; Safeco Credit Company, Inc. and local financial institutions.

Employees

At December 31, 2000, the Other Business Units segment employed 44 individuals, 10 of which were engaged in manufacturing operations and 34 in selling, general and administrative functions.

Common to All Operating Segments

Although the Company has four reportable business segments, the following information applies to all operating segments of the Company.

Government Regulations

None of the Company's operating segments operate within highly regulated industries. However, air pollution control equipment manufactured by the Company, principally for hot-mix asphalt plants, must comply with certain performance standards promulgated by the federal Environmental Protection Agency under the Clean Air Act applicable to "new sources" or new plants. Management believes that the Company's products meet all material requirements of such regulations and of applicable state pollution standards and environmental protection laws.

In addition, due to the size and weight of certain equipment the Company manufactures, the Company and its customers sometimes confront conflicting state regulations on maximum weights transportable on highways and roads. This problem occurs most frequently in the movement of portable asphalt mixing plants. Also, some states have regulations governing the operation of asphalt mixing plants and most states have regulations relating to the accuracy of weights and measures, which affect some of the control systems manufactured by the Company.

Compliance with these government regulations has no material effect on capital expenditures, earnings, or the Company's competitive position within the market.

Employees

At December 31, 2000, the Company and its subsidiaries employed 3,301 individuals, of which 2,402 were engaged in manufacturing operations, 264 in engineering, including support staff, and 635 in selling, administrative and management functions.

Telsmith, Inc. has a labor agreement, which covers approximately 190 employees, that expires on October 13, 2001. None of Telsmith's other employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

On February 1, 2001, Trencor and the United States Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO, and CLC entered into a collective bargaining agreement that covers approximately 90 of Trencor's employees. This agreement expires on January 31, 2004. None of Trencor's other employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

Other than Telsmith and Trencor, there are no other collective bargaining agreements.

The Company considers its employee relations to be good.

Manufacturing

The Company manufactures many of the component parts and related equipment for its products while several large components of their products are purchased "ready for use"; such items include engines, axles, tires and hydraulics. In many cases, the Company designs, engineers and manufactures custom component parts and equipment to meet the particular needs of individual customers. Manufacturing operations during 2000 took place at twenty-one separate locations. The Company's manufacturing operations consist primarily of fabricating steel components and the assembly and testing of its products to ensure quality control standards have been achieved.

Seminars and Technical Bulletins

The Company periodically conducts technical and service seminars, which are primarily for contractors, employees and owners of asphalt mixing plants. In 2000, approximately 390 representatives of contractors and owners of hot-mix asphalt plants attended seminars held by the Company in Chattanooga, Tennessee. These seminars, which are taught by Company management and employees, cover a range of subjects including technological innovations in the hot-mix asphalt, aggregate processing, paving, milling, and recycle markets in which the Company manufactures products.

 

The Company also sponsors executive seminars for the management of the customers of Astec, Inc. Primarily the management of the Company teaches the seminars, but outside speakers are also utilized. In 2000, approximately 160 participants attended the executive seminars at the Company's state-of-the-art training center.

The Company sponsors Paving Professionals workshops at its training center for customers or potential customers of Roadtec, Inc. In 2000, approximately 350 participants attended these classroom sessions. Actual equipment application experience was provided at the Roadtec facility. In addition, service training seminars were also held at the Roadtec facility for approximately 450 customer service representatives.

Also during 2000, Telsmith had technical seminars for 97 customer representatives at Telsmith's facility in Wisconsin.

In addition to seminars, the Company publishes a number of technical bulletins detailing various technological and business issues relating to the asphalt industry.

Patents and Trademarks

The Company seeks to obtain patents to protect the novel features of its products. The Company and its subsidiaries hold 89 United States patents and 69 foreign patents. There are 50 United States and foreign patent applications pending.

The Company and its subsidiaries have approximately 71 trademarks registered in the United States including logos for Astec, Telsmith, Roadtec and Trencor, and the names ASTEC, TELSMITH, HEATEC, ROADTEC, TRENCOR, KOLBERG, JCI and PIONEER. Eighteen trademarks are also registered in foreign countries, including Canada, Great Britain, Mexico, New Zealand and Indonesia. The Company has 13 United States and foreign trademark applications pending.

The Company and its subsidiaries also license their technology to other manufacturers.

Engineering and Product Development

The Company dedicates substantial resources to engineering and product development. At December 31, 2000, the Company and its subsidiaries had 264 full-time individuals employed domestically in engineering and design capacities.

Seasonality and Backlog

During 1999, the Company's business volume became less seasonal, due mainly to growth through acquisitions and internal growth in the paving segment during the early part of the year. During the first two quarters of 2000, the Company's business volume followed the normal seasonal trend with the second quarter being stronger than the first. The third and fourth quarters of 2000 were significantly impacted by the economic factors discussed in the following paragraphs and therefore did not follow the normal seasonal trend.

As of December 31, 2000, the Company had a backlog for delivery of products at certain dates in the future of approximately $89,552,000. At December 31, 1999, the total backlog, restated to include Carlson Paving Products, Inc. and Osborn Engineered Products SA (Pty) Ltd., was approximately $96,572,000.

The Company's contracts reflected in the backlog are not, by their terms, subject to termination. Management believes that the Company is in substantial compliance with all manufacturing and delivery timetables.

Competition

Each business segment operates in domestic markets that are highly competitive regarding price, service and product quality. While specific competitors are named within each business segment discussion, imports do not generally constitute significant competition for the Company in the United States. However, in international sales, the Company generally competes with foreign manufacturers that may have a local presence in the market the Company is attempting to penetrate.

In addition, asphalt and concrete are generally considered competitive products as a surface choice for new roads and highways. A portion of the interstate highway system is paved in concrete, but over 90% of all surfaced roads in the United States are paved with asphalt. Although concrete is used for some new road surfaces, asphalt is used for virtually all resurfacing, even the resurfacing of most concrete roads. Management does not believe that concrete, as a competitive surface choice, materially impacts the Company's business prospects.

Risk Factors

A decrease or delay in government funding of highway construction and maintenance may cause our revenues and profits to decrease.

Many of our customers depend substantially on government funding of highway construction and maintenance and other infrastructure projects. Any decrease or delay in government funding of highway construction and maintenance and other infrastructure projects could cause our revenues and profits to decrease. Federal government funding of infrastructure projects is usually accomplished through bills, which establish funding over a multi-year period. The most recent spending bill was signed into law in June of 1998 and covers federal spending through 2003. This legislation may be revised in future congressional sessions and federal funding of infrastructure may be decreased in the future, especially in the event of an economic recession. In addition, Congress could pass legislation in future sessions, which would allow for the diversion of highway funds for other national purposes or could restrict funding of infrastructure projects unless states comply with certain federal policies.

An increase in the price of oil or decrease in the availability of oil could reduce demand for our products.

A significant portion of our revenues relates to the sale of equipment that produces asphalt mix. A major component of asphalt is oil, and asphalt prices correlate with the price and availability of oil. A rise in the price of oil or a material decrease in the availability of oil would increase the cost of producing asphalt, which would likely decrease demand for asphalt, resulting in decreased demand for our products. This would likely cause our revenues and profits to decrease. In fact, rising gasoline, diesel fuel and liquid asphalt prices significantly increased the operating and raw material costs of our contractor and aggregate producer customers, reducing their profits and causing delays in some of their capital equipment purchases. These delays, coupled with rising interest rates in 2000, and a general slowdown in the U.S. economy, decreased demand for several key categories of products. We expect the market conditions experienced during the second half of 2000 to persist for at least the next several quarters and to continue to negatively impact revenues and margins during 2001.

Downturns in the general economy or the commercial construction industry may adversely affect our revenues and operating results.

General economic downturns, including any downturns in the commercial construction industry, could result in a material decrease in our revenues and operating results. Demand for many of our products, especially in the commercial construction industry, is cyclical. Sales of our products are sensitive to the states of the U.S., foreign and regional economies in general, and in particular, changes in commercial construction spending and government infrastructure spending. In addition, many of our costs are fixed and cannot be quickly reduced in response to decreased demand. We could face a downturn in the commercial construction industry based upon a number of factors, including:

Acquisitions that we have made in the past and future acquisitions involve risks that could adversely affect our future financial results.

We have completed ten acquisitions since 1994 and plan to acquire additional businesses in the future. We may be unable to achieve the benefits expected to be realized from our acquisitions. In addition, we may incur additional costs and our management's attention may be diverted because of unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other risks inherent in acquiring businesses, including the following:

Competition could reduce revenue from our products and services and cause us to lose market share.

We currently face strong competition in product performance, price and service. Some of our national competitors have greater financial, product development and marketing resources than we have. If competition in our industry intensifies or if our current competitors enhance their products or lower their prices for competing products, we may lose sales or be required to lower the prices we charge for our products. This may reduce revenue from our products and services, lower our gross margins or cause us to lose market share. In fact, some key competitors slashed prices in 2000 in an effort to make sales as demand in our industry slowed. As a result, we experienced price erosion and lower gross margins.

We may face product liability claims or other liabilities due to the nature of our business. If we are unable to obtain or maintain insurance or if our insurance does not cover liabilities, we may incur significant costs which could reduce our profitability.

We manufacture heavy machinery, which is used by our customers at excavation and construction sites and on high-traffic roads. Any defect in, or improper operation of, our equipment can result in personal injury and death, and damage to or destruction of property, any of which could cause product liability claims to be filed against us. The amount and scope of our insurance coverage may not be adequate to cover all losses or liabilities we may incur in the event of a product liability claim. We may not be able to maintain insurance of the types or at the levels we deem necessary or adequate or at rates we consider reasonable. Any liabilities not covered by insurance could reduce our profitability or have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

If we become subject to increased governmental regulation, we may incur significant costs.

Our hot-mix asphalt plants contain air pollution control equipment that must comply with performance standards promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency. These performance standards may increase in the future. Changes in these requirements could cause us to undertake costly measures to redesign or modify our equipment or otherwise adversely affect the manufacturing processes of our products. Such changes could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

Also, due to the size and weight of some of the equipment that we manufacture, we often are required to comply with conflicting state regulations on the maximum weight transportable on highways and roads. In addition, some states regulate the operation of our component equipment, including asphalt mixing plants and soil remediation equipment, and most states regulate the accuracy of weights and measures, which affect some of the control systems that we manufacture. We may incur material costs or liabilities in connection with the regulatory requirements applicable to our business.

If we are unable to protect our proprietary technology from infringement or if our technology infringes technology owned by others, then the demand for our products may decrease or we may be forced to modify our products that could increase our costs .

We hold numerous patents covering technology and applications related to many of our products and systems, and numerous trademarks and trade names registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and in foreign countries. Our existing or future patents or trademarks may not adequately protect us against infringements, and pending patent or trademark applications may not result in issued patents or trademarks. Our patents, registered trademarks and patent applications, if any, may not be upheld if challenged, and competitors may develop similar or superior methods or products outside the protection of our patents. This could reduce demand for our products and materially decrease our revenues. If our products are deemed to infringe upon the patents or proprietary rights of others, we could be required to modify the design of our products, change the name of our products or obtain a license for the use of some of the technologies used in our products. We may be unable to do any of the foregoing in a timely manner, upon acceptable terms and conditions, or at all, and the failure to do so could cause us to incur additional costs or lose revenues.

Our success depends on key members of our management and other employees.

Dr. J. Don Brock, our Chairman and President, is of significant importance to our business and operations. The loss of his services may adversely affect our business. In addition, our ability to attract and retain qualified engineers, skilled manufacturing personnel and other professionals, either through direct hiring, or acquisition of other businesses employing such professionals, will also be an important factor in determining our future success.

Difficulties in managing and expanding in international markets could divert management's attention from our existing operations.

In 2000, international sales represented approximately 12% of our total sales. We plan to continue to increase our presence in international markets. In connection with any increase in international sales efforts, we will need to hire, train and retain qualified personnel in countries where language, cultural or regulatory barriers may exist. Any difficulties in expanding our international sales may divert management's attention from our existing operations. In addition, international revenues are subject to the following risks:

Our quarterly operating results are likely to fluctuate, which may decrease our stock price.

Our quarterly revenues, expenses and operating results have varied significantly in the past and are likely to vary significantly from quarter to quarter in the future. As a result, our operating results may fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors in some quarters, which could result in a decrease in the market price of our common stock. The reasons our quarterly results may fluctuate include:

Period to period comparisons of such items are not necessarily meaningful and, as a result, should not be relied on as indications of future performance.

Our Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, Rights Agreement and Tennessee law may inhibit a takeover, which could delay or prevent a transaction in which shareholders might receive a premium over market price for their shares.

Our charter, bylaws and Tennessee law contain provisions that may delay, deter or inhibit a future acquisition, or an attempt to obtain control, of Astec. This could occur even if our shareholders are offered an attractive value for their shares or if a substantial number or even a majority of our shareholders believe the takeover is in their best interest. These provisions are intended to encourage any person interested in acquiring us or obtaining control of us to negotiate with and obtain the approval of our Board of Directors in connection with the transaction. Provisions that could delay, deter or inhibit a future acquisition, or an attempt to obtain control, of us include the following:

In addition, the rights of holders of our common stock will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of our preferred stock that may be issued in the future and that may be senior to the rights of holders of our common stock. On December 22, 1995, our Board of Directors approved a Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement, which provides for one preferred stock purchase right in respect of each share of our common stock. These rights become exercisable upon a person or group of affiliated persons acquiring 15% or more of our then-outstanding common stock by all persons other than an existing 15% shareholder. This Rights Agreement also could discourage bids for the shares of common stock at a premium and could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our shares.

 
 
 
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Some of the statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. They include statements concerning:

You can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as "expect," "believe," "goal," "plan," "intend," "estimate," "may," "will" and similar words. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including those described in the "Risk Factors" section and elsewhere in this prospectus, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those suggested by these forward-looking statements.

Item 2. PROPERTIES
The location, approximate square footage, acreage occupied and principal function of the properties owned or leased by the Company are set forth below:

Location

Approximate Square Footage

Approximate Acreage

Principal Function

Chattanooga, Tennessee

424,000

59

Corporate and subsidiary offices, manufacturing - Astec

Chattanooga, Tennessee

---

63

Storage yard - Astec

Cleveland, Tennessee

28,400

3

Offices and manufacturing - Astec

Rossville, Georgia

40,500

3

Manufacturing - Astec

Chattanooga, Tennessee

84,200

5

Offices, manufacturing - Heatec

Chattanooga, Tennessee

135,000

15

Offices, manufacturing - Roadtec

Chattanooga, Tennessee

51,200

7

Manufacturing and parts warehouse - Roadtec

Chattanooga, Tennessee

5,000

2

Offices - Astec Financial Services

Mequon, Wisconsin

203,000

30

Offices and manufacturing - Telsmith

Sterling, Illinois

32,000

8

Offices and manufacturing - PEP

Grapevine, Texas

176,000

52

Offices, manufacturing - Trencor

Lakeville, Massachusetts

800

---

Leased sales and service office - Telsmith

Libertyhill, Texas

700

---

Leased sales and service office - Telsmith

Eugene, Oregon

130,000

8

Offices and manufacturing - Johnson Crushers International

Eugene, Oregon

25,600

---

Leased offices, manufacturing - Johnson Crushers International

Odessa, Texas

4,100

1

Leased to a third party

Inman, South Carolina

13,600

8

Leased to a third party until September 30, 2000 with option to buy

Albuquerque, New Mexico

110,700

14

Offices and manufacturing - CEI
(partially leased to a third party)

Yankton, South Dakota

252,000

50

Offices and manufacturing - Kolberg-Pioneer

West Salem, Ohio

100,000

29

Offices and manufacturing - American Augers

Thornbury, Ontario, Canada

55,000

12

Offices and manufacturing - Breaker Technology Ltd.

Riverside, California

18,000

---

Leased offices and manufacturing - Breaker Technology, Inc.

Solon, Ohio

5,700

---

Leased offices and manufacturing - Breaker Technology, Inc.

Morris, Minnesota

152,000

30

Offices and manufacturing - Superior

Covington, Georgia

11,000

6

Offices and manufacturing - Pavement Technology

Tacoma, Washington

41,000

5

Offices and manufacturing - Carlson Paving Products

Cape Town, South Africa

400

---

Leased sales office and warehouse - Osborn

Durban, South Africa

300

---

Leased sales office and warehouse - Osborn

Witbank, South Africa

500

---

Leased sales office and warehouse - Osborn

Welkom, South Africa

300

---

Leased sales office and warehouse -Osborn

Bethal, South Africa

---

11

Vacant lot - Osborn

Johannesburg, South Africa

156,100

18

Offices and manufacturing - Osborn


Management believes that each of the Company's facilities provides office or manufacturing space suitable for its current needs and considers the terms under which it leases facilities to be reasonable.


Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Management has reviewed all claims and lawsuits and, upon the advice of counsel, has made provision for any estimable losses; however, the Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of the outstanding claims and lawsuits.

 

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

 

Executive Officers of the Registrant

The name, title, ages and business experience of the executive officers of the Company are listed below.

J. Don Brock, Ph.D., P.E., has been President and a Director of the Company since its incorporation in 1972 and assumed the additional position of Chairman of the Board in 1975. He was the Treasurer of the Company from 1972 until 1994. From 1969 to 1972, Dr. Brock was President of the Asphalt Division of CMI Corporation. He earned his Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Dr. Brock and Thomas R. Campbell, President of Roadtec, are first cousins. He is 62.

Richard W. Bethea, Jr., became Executive Vice President on January 1, 2001 and has served as the Company's Secretary since 1997. He served as Vice President and Corporate Counsel from 1997 to 2000. Mr. Bethea has been a practicing lawyer since 1978. He has an undergraduate degree in accounting and a law degree from the University of Georgia. Before joining the Company, Mr. Bethea was a member (stockholder) and partner with the law firm Stophel & Stophel, P. C., in Chattanooga, Tennessee. He has served as the Company's litigation counsel since 1983. He is 48.

F. McKamy Hall, a Certified Public Accountant, became Chief Financial Officer during 1998 and has served as Vice President and Treasurer since 1997. He has served as Corporate Controller of the Company since 1987. From 1985 to 1987, Mr. Hall was Vice President of Finance at Quadel Management Corporation, a company engaged in real estate management. Mr. Hall has an undergraduate degree in accounting and a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. He is 58.

W. Norman Smith was appointed Group Vice President-Asphalt in 1998 and has served as the President of Astec, Inc. since 1994. He formerly served as President of Heatec, Inc. from 1977 to 1994. From 1972 to 1977, Mr. Smith was a Regional Sales Manager with the Company. From 1969 to 1972, Mr. Smith was an engineer with the Asphalt Division of CMI Corporation. Mr. Smith has also served as a director of the Company since 1972. He is 61.

Robert G. Stafford was appointed Group Vice President-Aggregate in 1998. Prior to that time he served as President of Telsmith, Inc. since 1991. Between 1987 and 1991, Mr. Stafford served as President of Telsmith, Inc., a subsidiary of Barber-Greene. From 1984 until the Company's acquisition of Barber-Greene in December 1986, Mr. Stafford was Vice President - Operations of Barber-Greene and General Manager of Telsmith. He became a director of the Company in March 1988. He is 62.

Thomas R. Campbell has served as President of Roadtec, Inc. since 1988. From 1981 to 1988 he served as Operations Manager of Roadtec. Mr. Campbell and J. Don Brock, President of the Company, are first cousins. He is 51.

James G. May has served as President of Heatec, Inc. since 1994. From 1984 until 1994 he served as Vice President of Engineering of Astec, Inc. He is 56.

Albert E. Guth has been President of Astec Financial Services, Inc. since 1996. He served as Chief Financial Officer of the Company from 1987 through 1996, as Senior Vice President from 1984 to 1997, Secretary of the Company from 1972 to 1997, and Treasurer from 1994 to 1997. Mr. Guth, who has been a director since 1972, was Vice President of the Company from 1972 until 1984. From 1969 to 1972, Mr. Guth was the Controller of the Asphalt Division of CMI Corporation. He is 61.

Richard A. Patek became President of Kolberg-Pioneer, Inc. in 1997. From 1995 to 1997, he served as Director of Materials of Telsmith, Inc. From 1992 to 1995, Mr. Patek was Director of Materials and Manufacturing of the former Milwaukee plant location. From 1978 to 1992, he held various manufacturing management positions at Telsmith. Mr. Patek is a graduate of Milwaukee School of Engineering. He is 44.

Robert R. Hoitt has been the President of Johnson Crushers International, Inc., which was acquired by the Company on November 1, 1998, since 1995. From 1966 through 1995 he served in various management positions, including General Manager and Vice President of Cedarapids, Inc. in its Eljay division. He is 57.

Frank D. Cargould became President of Breaker Technology Ltd. and Breaker Technology, Inc. on October 18, 1999. The Breaker Technology companies were formed on August 13, 1999 when the Company purchased substantially all of the assets of Teledyne Specialty Equipment's Construction and Mining business unit from Allegheny Teledyne Inc. From 1994 to 1999, he was Director of Sales - East for Teledyne CM Products, Inc. He is 58.

Roger K. Eve has been President of American Augers, Inc., which was acquired by the Company on October 29, 1999, since 1991. He was also appointed President of Trencor, Inc., in 1999. From 1981 to 1991, Mr. Eve served as President of J.C.B., Inc. and J.C.B. Excavators Ltd. He is 55.

Neil E. Schmidgall has been President of Superior Industries of Morris, Inc., which was acquired by the Company on November 1, 1999, since 1972. Since 1992, Mr. Schmidgall has been a director and partner of First Federal Savings Bank of Morris. He is 55.

Timothy Gonigam was appointed President of Production Engineered Products, Inc. on October 1, 2000. From 1995 to 2000 Mr. Gonigam held the position of Sales Manager for Production Engineered Products, Inc. He is 38.

Lawrence Raymond has been President of Carlson Paving Products, Inc., which was acquired by the Company on October 2, 2000, since 1986. He is 48.

Alan L. Forsyth has been Managing Director of Osborn Engineered Products SA (Pty) Ltd. since 1999. The Company purchased the materials handling and processing products division of the Boart-Longyear Division of Anglo Operations Limited on September 29, 2000. From 1998 to 1999, Mr. Forsyth was Deputy Managing Director and served as Divisional Director from 1987 to 1998. He is 48.


PART II
Item 5
. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters
The Company's Common Stock is traded in the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol "ASTE." The Company has never paid any cash dividends on its Common Stock.
The high and low sales prices of the Company's Common Stock as reported on the NASDAQ Stock Market for each quarter during the last two fiscal years are as follows:

Price Per Share

2000 High Low

1st Quarter 28-1/16 16-3/4

2nd Quarter 29-7/8 22-13/16

3rd Quarter 25-1/2 22-13/16

4th Quarter 14-3/8 8-3/8

 

Price Per Share

1999 High Low

1st Quarter 35-5/16 20-7/8

2nd Quarter 43-3/4 29-3/4

3rd Quarter 41-5/8 20-1/4

4th Quarter 29-3/8 14-3/4

 

As of March 15, 2001 there were approximately 6,100 holders of the Company's Common Stock.


Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Selected financial data appear on page A-1 of this Report.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations appears on pages A-2 to A-5 of this Report.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Information appearing under the caption "Market Risk and Risk Management Policies" appears on page A-5 of this report.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Financial statements and supplementary financial information appear on pages A-6 to A-23 of this Report.

Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Information regarding the Company's directors included under the caption "Election of Directors - Certain Information Concerning Nominees and Directors" in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement to be delivered to the shareholders of the Company in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 25, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference. Information regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is also included under Section 16(a) "Filing Requirements" in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11. Executive Compensation
Information included under the caption, "Executive Compensation" in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement to be delivered to the shareholders of the Company in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 25, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Information included under the captions "Election of Directors - Certain Information Concerning Nominees and Directors," "Common Stock Ownership of Management" and "Common Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners" in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement to be delivered to the shareholders of the Company in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 25, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
On December 14, 1998, Edna F. Brock, the mother of Dr. J. Don Brock, Chairman of the Board and President of the Company, loaned $85,000 to the Company to supplement its working capital revolving credit facility. The Company executed a demand note payable to Mrs. Brock in connection with this loan bearing interest at a rate equal to that paid to Bank One N.A. under the Company's unsecured revolving line of credit. At the time Mrs. Brock loaned these funds to the Company, the Company's outstanding balance under its $70,000,000 revolving credit facility was approximately $26,000,000. The Company is making quarterly interest payments to Mrs. Brock. In June of 2000, Mrs. Brock loaned the Company an additional $29,670, which bears the same interest rate as the previous note. At the time these funds were loaned to the Company, the Company's outstanding balance under its $150,000,000 revolving credit facility was $95,325,000.

PART IV

Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
(a)(1) The following financial statements and other information appear in Appendix "A" to this Report and are filed as a part hereof:
. Selected Consolidated Financial Data.
. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
. Report of Independent Auditors.
. Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2000 and 1999.
. Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998.
. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998.
. Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998.
. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(a)(2) Other than as described below, Financial Statement Schedules are not filed with this Report because the Schedules are either inapplicable or the required information is presented in the Financial Statements or Notes thereto. The following Schedules appear in Appendix "A" to this Report and are filed as a part hereof:

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.

(a)(3) The following Exhibits* are incorporated by reference into or are filed with this Report:

3.1

Restated Charter of the Company (incorporated by reference from the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, effective June 18, 1986, File No. 33- 5348).

 

 

3.2

Articles of Amendment to the Restated Charter of the Company, effective September 12, 1988 (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1988, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

3.3

Articles of Amendment to the Restated Charter of the Company, effective June 8, 1989 (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1989, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

3.4

Articles of Amendment to the Restated Charter of the Company, effective January 15, 1999 (incorporated by reference from the Company Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1999, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

3.5

Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, adopted March 14, 1990 (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1989, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

4.1

Trust Indenture between City of Mequon and Firstar Trust Company, as Trustee, dated as of February 1, 1994 (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

4.2

Indenture of Trust, dated April 1, 1994, by and between Grapevine Industrial Development Corporation and Bank One, Texas, NA, as Trustee (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

4.3

Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement, dated December 22, 1995 (incorporated by reference from the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 22, 1995, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.1

Loan Agreement between City of Mequon, Wisconsin and Telsmith, Inc. dated as of February 1, 1994 (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.2

Credit Agreement by and between Telsmith, Inc. and M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank, dated as of February 1, 1994 (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.3

Security Agreement by and between Telsmith, Inc. and M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank, dated as of February 1, 1994 (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.4

Mortgage and Security Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement by and between Telsmith, Inc. and M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank, dated as of February 1, 1994 (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.5

Guarantee of Astec Industries, Inc. in favor of M&I Ilsley Bank, dated as of February 1, 1994 (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.6

Loan Agreement dated as of April 1, 1994, between Grapevine Industrial Development Corporation and Trencor, Inc. (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.7

Letter of Credit Agreement, dated April 1, 1994, between First Chicago NBD and Trencor, Inc. (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.8

Guaranty Agreement, dated April 1, 1994, between Astec Industries, Inc. and Bank One, Texas, NA, as Trustee (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.9

Astec Guaranty, dated April 29, 1994, of debt of Trencor, Inc. in favor of First Chicago NBD (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.10

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated February 1, 1996 to be effective as of January 1, 1995 (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995, File No. 0-14714). *

 

 

10.11

Trust under Astec Industries, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan, dated January 1, 1996 (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995, File No. 0-14714). *

 

 

10.12

Astec Industries, Inc. 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from Appendix A of the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on April 23, 1998). *

 

 

10.13

Astec Industries, Inc. Executive Officer Annual Bonus Equity Election Plan (incorporated by reference from Appendix B of the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on April 23, 1998). *

 

 

10.14

Astec Industries, Inc. Non-Employee Directors' Stock Incentive Plan incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, File No. 0-14714). *

 

 

10.15

Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated November 27, 1997 between the Company, Astec Financial Services, Inc. and First Chicago NBD (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.16

First Amendment, dated October 30, 1998, to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated November 24, 1997, by and between the Company and Astec Financial Services, Inc. and The First National Bank of Chicago (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.17

Second Amendment, dated June 3, 1999, to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated November 24, 1997, by and between the Company and Astec Financial Services, Inc. and The First National Bank of Chicago (incorporated by reference from the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1999, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.18

Third Amendment, dated August 11, 1999, to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated November 24, 1997, by and between the Company and Astec Financial Services, Inc. and The First National Bank of Chicago (incorporated by reference from the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1999, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.19

Revolving Line of Credit Note dated December 2, 1997 between Kolberg-Pioneer, Inc. and Astec Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.20

Guaranty Joinder Agreement dated December 1997 between Kolberg-Pioneer, Inc. and Astec Holdings, Inc. in favor of the First National Bank of Chicago. (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.21

Loan Agreement between the City of Yankton, South Dakota and Kolberg Pioneer, Inc. dated August 11, 1998 for variable/fixed rate demand Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, Series 1998 (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.22

Letter of Credit Agreement dated August 12, 1998 between the First National Bank of Chicago and Astec Industries, Inc., Astec Financial Services, Inc. and Kolberg-Pioneer, Inc. (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.23

Promissory Note dated December 14, 1998 between Astec Industries, Inc. and Edna F. Brock (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.24

Waiver for December 31, 1998, dated March 9, 1999, with respect to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated November 24, 1997 by and between the Company and The First National Bank of Chicago (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.25

Guaranty of Astec Industries, Inc., dated February 23, 1998, of debt of Pavement Technology, Inc. in favor of Tucker Federal Bank (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.26

Purchase Agreement dated October 30, 1998, effective October 31, 1998, between Astec Industries, Inc. and Johnson Crushers International, Inc. (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, File No. 0-14714).

10.27

Term Loan in the amount of $15,000,000 dated August 13, 1999 by and between Astec Industries, Inc. and Bank One, NA (incorporated by reference from the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1999, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.28

Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated August 13, 1999, by and among Teledyne Industries Canada Limited, Teledyne CM Products Inc. and Astec Industries, Inc. (incorporated by reference from the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1999, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.29

Stock Purchase Agreement, dated October 31, 1999, by and among American Augers, Inc. and Its Shareholders and Astec Industries, Inc. (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.30

Stock Purchase Agreement, dated November 1, 1999, by and among SIMCO, LLC and the Superior Industries of Morris, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Astec Industries, Inc. (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.31

Amended and Restated Master Note in the amount of $15,000,000 dated December 29, 1999 by and between Astec Industries, Inc. and Bank One, NA (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.32

Amended and Restated Master Note in the amount of $20,000,000 dated December 29, 1999 by and between Astec Industries, Inc. and Bank One, NA (incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, File No. 0-14714).

 

 

10.33

Sale of Business Agreement, dated September 29, 2000, between Anglo Operations Limited and High Mast Properties 18 Limited and Astec Industries, Inc. for the purchase of the materials handling and processing products division of the Boart-Longyear Division of Anglo Operations Limited.

 

 

10.34

Acquisition Agreement, dated October 2, 2000, by and among Larry Raymond, Carlson Paving Products, Inc. and Astec Industries, Inc.

 

 

10.35

Collective Bargaining Agreement, dated February 1, 2001, by and between Trencor, Inc. and the United States Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO and CLC.

22

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

 

 

23

Consent of Independent Auditors

 

 

*

Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

(b)

No reports on Form 8-K were filed in the fourth quarter.

(c)

The Exhibits to this Report are listed under Item 14(a)(3) above.

(d)

The Financial Statement Schedules to this Report are listed under Item 14(a)(2) above.

 

 

 

 


*The Exhibits are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K. Inapplicable Exhibits are not included in the list.
 
 

APPENDIX "A"

To

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

ITEMS 8 and 14(a)(1) and (2), (c) and (d)

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND

FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.

Contents

Page

Selected Consolidated Financial Data

A-1

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

A-2

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2000 and 1999

A-6

Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998

A-7

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998

A-8

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998

A-10

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

A-11

Report of Independent Auditors

A-24

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

A-25

 
 

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
(in thousands, except as noted*)

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

Consolidated Income Statement Data

Net sales

$ 520,688

$ 449,627

$ 363,945

$ 265,365

$ 221,413

Selling, general and

  administrative expenses

69,011

56,280

46,796

36,125

35,346

Research and development

6,726

5,356

4,681

3,707

5,868

Income from operations

47,138

52,521

40,427

24,661

8,051

Interest expense

8,652

4,253

2,709

2,398

1,656

Net income

26,281

31,712

24,436

13,809

4,345

Earnings per common share*(1)

  Basic

1.37

1.66

1.30

.72

.22

  Diluted

1.33

1.59

1.26

.71

.21

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data

Working capital

$ 155,736

$ 127,569

$ 81,865

$ 71,459

$ 69,884

Total assets

402,306

355,437

248,320

192,243

167,853

Total short-term debt

1,986

596

646

500

2,051

Long-term debt, less current
  maturities

118,511

102,685

47,220

35,230

30,497

Shareholders' equity

194,623

167,258

132,658

105,612

99,393

Book value per common

  share at year-end*(1)

10.07

8.75

7.44

6.12

5.37

 

 

Quarterly Financial Highlights

First

Second

Third

Fourth

(Unaudited)

Quarter

Quarter

Quarter

Quarter

2000

Net sales

$ 140,872

$ 159,726

$ 103,036

$ 117,054

Gross profit

33,758

40,858

24,608

23,651

Net income

8,627

12,719

3,407

1,528

Earnings per common share*

Basic

.45

.66

.18

.08

Diluted

.44

.64

.17

.08

1999

Net sales

$ 112,478

$ 119,958

$ 106,886

$ 110,305

Gross profit

28,009

33,839

27,779

24,549

Net income

8,567

11,155

7,915

4,075

Earnings per common share*

Basic

.45

.59

.41

.21

Diluted

.43

.55

.40

.21

Common Stock Price*

2000 High

$ 28.06

$ 29.88

$ 25.50

$ 14.38

2000 Low

16.75

22.81

9.94

8.38

1999 High

35.31

43.75

41.63

29.38

1999 Low

20.88

29.75

20.25

14.75

 

 

The Company's common stock is traded on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation (NASDAQ) National Market under the symbol ASTE. Prices shown are the high and low bid prices as announced by NASDAQ. The Company has never paid any dividends on its common stock.

The number of common shareholders is approximately 6,100.

  1. Restated for 1998 and prior to retroactively reflect the two-for-one stock split effected in the form of a dividend on January 18, 1999.

 

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Results of Operations; 2000 vs. 1999

Net income for 2000 was $26,281,000, or $1.33 per diluted share, a decrease of $5,431,000, or 17.1%, compared to net income of $31,712,000, or $1.59 per diluted share in 1999. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding at December 31, 2000 was 19,721,288 compared to 19,930,376 at December 31, 1999.

Net sales for 2000 were $520,688,000, an increase of $71,061,000, or 15.8%, compared to 1999. The 2000 domestic sales increased from $403,832,000 to $464,313,000, or $60,481,000, a 15.0% increase. Domestic sales are primarily from equipment purchases made by customers for use in construction for privately funded infrastructure development and public sector spending on infrastructure development. Public sector spending at the federal, state and local levels is driven in large part by federal spending under the six-year federal-aid highway program, the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century ("TEA-21") enacted in June 1998. TEA-21 authorized the appropriation of $217 billion in federal aid for road, highway and bridge construction, repair and improvement and other federal highway and transit projects for federal fiscal years October 1, 1998 through September 30, 2003. During 2000, domestic sales were negatively impacted by rising interest rates, volatile and rising gas and oil prices, the beginning stages of a general economic slowdown and delays in public sector highway projects. Most of this negative impact was felt in the second half of the year. The increase in total sales is attributed primarily to 1999 acquisitions accounting for sales of $90,800,000 (with a full year of operations in 2000), offset by a $19,739,000, or 4.3% decline in internally generated sales.

International sales in 2000 increased $17,704,000, or 38.7%, to approximately $63,499,000 compared to 1999 international sales of $45,795,000. Increased sales in Central America, Africa and Australia comprise most of the increase over 1999. Asphalt plant equipment and underground equipment accounted for the increase in Australia. The increase in Africa and Central America was due to aggregate equipment sales.

Parts sales increased from $73,946,000 to $83,960,000, or 13.5%.

Gross profit was 23.6% in 2000 compared to 25.4% in 1999. Gross profit declines in asphalt and aggregate equipment accounted for most of the reduction. The erosion in both cases resulted from competitive price pressure and a lack of utilization of capacity primarily due to lower sales volumes.

In 2000, selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 13.3% of net sales from 12.5% of net sales in 1999. The primary reason for the dollar increase in SG&A is related to acquisitions in 1999 and 2000. The percentage is impacted by lower than expected sales while being staffed and equipped for much larger volume.

Research and development expenses increased by $1,370,000, or 25.7%, from $5,356,000 in 1999 to $6,726,000 in 2000. Excluding 1999 and 2000 acquisitions, research and development increased 9.7% as the Company continued developing innovative products.

Interest expense for 2000 increased to 1.7% of net sales from 0.9% of sales for 1999. The increase in dollars related primarily to borrowings required for acquisitions in 1999 and 2000 plus increased working capital.

Income tax expense for 2000 was $16,441,000 compared to $19,819,000 for 1999, or 38.5% of pre-tax income for both years.

The backlog at December 31, 2000 was $89,552,000 compared to $96,572,000 at December 31, 1999 (restated for acquisitions). The backlog for asphalt plant orders decreased significantly from 1999, while aggregate orders, primarily related to South Africa and aggregate systems business, increased from the prior year. The impact of TEA-21 has been felt incrementally in 1999 and 2000, but the full impact of the spending of appropriated funds may not be felt until 2001 or after. In this regard, the American Road and Transportation Builders Association's economists project highway construction growth from 9.0% to 10.8% in 2001. The Company expects the extremely challenging market and economic conditions that were prevalent during the second half of 2000 to persist for at least the next several quarters. The Company is unable to determine whether this backlog effect was experienced by the industry as a whole. We are unable to assess the amount of the impact attributable to the TEA-21 legislation which became effective in October 1998. While the backlog reflects a decline,
management believes that this is reflective of the current economic conditions in the United States and the current hesitancy of Astec customers to commit to capital equipment purchases. The hesitancy is a result of our customers awaiting improvement of economic conditions or the awarding of new contracts for jobs. The total spending on highway construction declined slightly in 2000 but is expected to rise slightly in 2001. The number of contracts put in place in 2000 declined, but the average size increased. Some contracts are multi-year contracts.

Asphalt Group: This segment had a decrease in sales of $4,703,000, or 2.4%, and a segment profit decrease of $7,452,000, or 29.3%, compared to 1999. The primary reasons for the decrease in sales are instability of gas and oil prices, delay of public sector construction projects and increasing interest rates. Competitive price pressure and lack of utilization of capacity significantly impacted gross profits and segment income.

Aggregate and Mining Group: The 2000 sales for this segment increased $35,731,000, or 23.0%, over 1999, primarily due to the acquisitions of Superior Industries of Morris, Inc. and Breaker Technology Ltd. in late 1999 and Osborn Engineered Products SA (Pty) Ltd. in late 2000. Segment profit increased $168,000, or 0.9% over 1999. Competitive price pressure and lack of utilization of capacity impacted gross profits and segment income.

Mobile Asphalt Paving Group: The 2000 sales in this segment decreased $4,107,000, or 6.1% versus 1999. Segment profit also decreased $2,856,000, or 25.5%. The decrease in sales was present in all product lines. There was some competitive price pressure, but there was less gross profit percent impact than in other segments.

Underground Group: The 2000 sales in this segment increased by $44,238,000, or 140.4%, over 1999, primarily from sales by American Augers, Inc., a November 1, 1999 acquisition, which were included for the full year of 2000. The directional drilling business of American Augers grew in connection with the optical fiber cable and other utility industries. The addition of American Augers' volume required reporting of this new segment under the provisions of FAS 131.

Results of Operations; 1999 vs. 1998

Net income for 1999 was $31,712,000, or $1.59 per diluted share, an increase of $7,226,000, or 29.8%, compared to net income of $24,436,000, or $1.26 per share diluted, in 1998, restated to reflect the two-for-one stock split that took effect on January 18, 1999.

Net sales for 1999 were $449,627,000, an increase of $85,682,000, or 23.5%, compared to 1998. The 1999 domestic sales increased from $294,430,000 to $403,832,000, or $109,402,000, for a 37.2% increase from 1998. The increase in domestic sales is attributed to increased sales in all product lines. A strong domestic economy and spending under the new six-year highway bill, TEA-21, which authorizes $217 billion in federal investment through 2003 for road repair, improvement and other federal highway and transit projects are the primary reasons for the increase in domestic sales. Approximately 46% of the sales growth was generated internally, while 54% was from acquisitions.

International sales for 1999 decreased $23,720,000, or 34.1%, to approximately $45,795,000 compared to 1998 international sales of $69,515,000. Sales in South America decreased 85% in 1999 from 1998 levels, with approximately 53% of the decrease attributable to a decrease in sales of trenching equipment and the remaining decrease split between decreased demand for asphalt equipment and aggregate processing equipment. International sales represented 10.2% and 19.1% of net sales in 1999 and 1998, respectively.

Gross profit was 25.4% in 1999 compared to 25.3% in 1998. Through September 30, 1999, the gross profit had improved to 26.4%; however, in the fourth quarter the gross profit was impacted by costs relating to the move of one aggregate company to a new facility, by the costs of interruptions and delays associated with a computer installation in another company and the loss of international sales.

In 1999, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 12.5% of net sales from 12.9% of net sales in 1998. The volume increase in net sales is the primary factor responsible for the decreased percentage. Approximately 58% of the increase in dollars related to expenses of acquired operations.

Although research and development expenses increased $675,000, the percentage of net sales decreased to 1.2% in 1999 from 1.3% in the prior year. The increase in sales volume is the primary reason for the reduction in the percentage.

Interest expense for 1999 increased to 0.9% of sales from 0.7% of sales for 1998. The increase in dollars related primarily to borrowings required for acquisitions.

Income tax expense for 1999 was $19,819,000, or 38.5% of pre-tax income, compared to $15,126,000 for 1998, or 38.2% of pre-tax income. The increase is the result of the Company's decreased international sales and the mix of revenue by state.

The backlog at December 31, 1999 was $94,827,000 compared to $99,461,000 at December 31, 1998 (restated for acquisitions). The backlog contains a significant increase for asphalt plant orders and a reduction for aggregate orders. The impact of TEA-21 was felt incrementally in 1998 and 1999.

Asphalt Group: This segment had increases in sales of $29,291,000, or 17.9%, and segment profit of $3,884,000, or 18.0%, over 1998. The primary reason for the increase in sales was a strong economy accompanied by the impact of TEA-21. International sales in this segment decreased $9,490,000, or 35.3%, versus 1998.

Aggregate and Mining Group: The 1999 sales in this segment increased $42,494,000, or 37.7%, over 1998, primarily due to the acquisition of Johnson Crushers International, Inc., Superior Industries of Morris, Inc. and Breaker Technology Ltd. Segment profit increased $5,237,000, or 40.4% over 1998. International sales in this segment decreased $1,508,000, or 8.2% versus 1998.

Mobile Asphalt Paving Group: The 1999 sales in this segment increased $7,050,000, or 11.7% over 1998. Segment profit also increased $1,310,000, or 13.2%. The primary increase in sales resulted from an increase in sales of our patented material transfer vehicle, the Shuttle Buggy. International sales in this segment decreased $2,850,000, or 36.5% versus 1998.

Liquidity and Capital

During 2000, the Company continued to maintain a strong financial position while funding capital projects, working capital needs and two business combinations with cash provided by operations, bank borrowings and low interest rate industrial revenue bonds. At December 31, 2000, working capital totaled $155,736,000 compared to $127,569,000 at December 31, 1999. The working capital increase was primarily the result of a $10,323,000 increase in finance receivables at Astec Financial Services ("AFS") and a $17,816,000 increase in inventories, excluding 2000 acquisitions. Approximately $4,255,000 of the increase in working capital was the result of the two acquisitions completed in 2000.

The Company has an unsecured $150,000,000 revolving credit loan agreement with a bank which expires on November 22, 2002. At December 31, 2000, the Company was utilizing $98,700,000 of the amount available under the credit facility for borrowing and an additional $18,440,000 to support outstanding letters of credit (primarily for industrial revenue bond issues). Principal covenants under the loan agreement include (i) the maintenance of minimum levels of net worth and compliance with minimum net worth, leverage and interest coverage ratios, (ii) a limitation on capital expenditures and rental expense, (iii) a prohibition against the payment of dividends, and (iv) a prohibition on large acquisitions except upon the consent of the lenders. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants related to the credit facility at December 31, 2000.

The bank revolving credit facility provides for a segregated portion of up to $50,000,000 for use by the Company's captive finance subsidiary, AFS. Advances under this portion of the loan agreement are limited to the "Eligible Receivables" of AFS as defined in the loan agreement. At December 31, 2000, AFS borrowings represented $20,075,000 of the total $98,700,000 outstanding under the loan agreement.

In addition to the bank revolving credit facility, the Company's South African subsidiary, Osborn Engineered Products SA (Pty) Ltd., has a credit facility available of $1,975,000 to finance short-term working capital needs and an additional $1,975,000 available to cover the short-term establishment of performance guarantee requirements.

The Company considers the unused portion of its bank revolving credit facility, coupled with cash expected to be generated by operations, adequate to meet its foreseeable funding needs, including planned 2001 capital expenditures of approximately $12,600,000 (excluding expenditures for equipment leased to others). There is a provision in the loan agreement allowing the borrowing of $10,000,000 from any source for needs beyond the revolver provisions. Capital expenditures (excluding those for equipment leased to others) were $20,791,000 in 2000 and $28,385,000 in 1999.

For additional information on current and long-term debt, see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Market Risk and Risk Management Policies

The Company is exposed to changes in interest rates, primarily from its long-term debt arrangements. Under its current policies, the Company uses interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes for a portion of its debt arrangements. Taking into account the effects of interest rate derivatives designated as hedges, a hypothetical 100 basis point adverse move (increase) in interest rates would adversely affect interest expense by approximately $875,000 for the year ended December 31, 2000. The Company's earnings and cash flows are also subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates; however, these fluctuations would not be significant to the Company's consolidated operations.

Contingencies

See Note 9 to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on certain pending litigation and contingent liabilities arising from recourse financing arrangements.

Environmental Matters

Based on information available, management believes the Company has adequately reserved for potential environmental liabilities and does not believe the potential liability will materially impact the future financial position of the Company.

Goodwill

At December 31, 2000, goodwill totaled $37,208,000, which is 19.1% of shareholders' equity and 9.2% of total assets.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

December 31,

Assets

2000

1999

Current assets:

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents Note 1

$   7,053,328

$   3,725,070

Trade receivables less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,105,000    in 2000 and $1,966,000 in 1999

55,500,511

60,093,938

Finance receivables Note 13

23,011,883

9,631,998

Notes and other receivables

4,647,572

11,639,809

Inventories Notes 1, 3

126,307,828

104,841,923

Prepaid expenses

3,595,524

4,308,596

Refundable income taxes

3,893,629

1,858,886

Deferred tax asset Note 8

7,824,451

6,931,749

Other current assets

159,059

319,358

  Total current assets

231,993,785

203,351,327

Property and equipment, net Note 4

126,927,532

109,388,156

Other assets:

Goodwill

37,207,924

36,299,808

Finance receivables Note 13

3,500,180

4,273,936

Notes receivable

362,138

493,352

Other

2,314,260

1,630,452

  Total other assets

43,384,502

42,697,548

Total assets

$ 402,305,819

$ 355,437,031


Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

Current liabilities: 

Current maturities of long-term debt Note 6

$   1,986,424

$     595,635

Accounts payable

35,585,181

36,430,028

Customer deposits

6,463,715

7,040,785

Accrued product warranty

4,441,845

4,075,358

Accrued payroll and related liabilities

14,019,935

14,579,479

Other accrued liabilities

13,760,679

13,061,524

  Total current liabilities

76,257,779

75,782,809

Long-term debt, less current maturities Note 6

118,510,887

102,685,470

Deferred tax liability Note 8

7,933,378

5,495,869

Deferred retirement costs Note 7

1,648,226

1,332,746

Other

2,884,421

2,882,561

Total liabilities

207,234,691

188,179,455

Minority interest

448,188

.

Shareholders' equity: Notes 1, 10 

Preferred stock - authorized 4,000,000 shares of $1.00 par value;
   none issued
 

Common stock - authorized 40,000,000 shares of $.20 par value;
   issued and outstanding
19,319,746 in 2000 and 19,121,062 in 1999

3,863,949

3,824,227

Additional paid-in capital

48,440,594

46,918,852

Accumulated other comprehensive income

(210,298)

266,888

Retained earnings

142,528,695

116,247,609

Total shareholders' equity

194,622,940

167,257,576

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

$ 402,305,819

$ 355,437,031

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

Year Ended December 31,

2000

1999

1998

Net sales

$520,687,851

$ 449,627,457

$ 363,945,191

Cost of sales

397,813,019

335,471,243

272,040,941

Gross profit

122,874,832

114,156,214

91,904,250

Selling, general and administrative expenses

69,011,339

56,279,937

46,796,409

Research and development expenses

6,725,884

5,355,736

4,681,019

Income from operations

47,137,609

52,520,541

40,426,822

Other income (expense):

   Interest expense

(8,652,339)

(4,253,219)

(2,708,981)

   Interest income

2,239,786

1,136,777

101,208

   Other income - net

2,201,579

2,121,228

1,668,869

Equity in (loss) income of joint venture

(195,781)

6,096

74,578

Income before income taxes

42,730,854

51,531,423

39,562,496

Income taxes Note 8

16,441,440

19,819,145

15,126,381

Income before minority interest

26,289,414

31,712,278

24,436,115

Minority interest

8,328

.

.

Net income

$ 26,281,086

$ 31,712,278

$ 24,436,115

Earnings per Common Share Note 1

Net income:

   Basic

$ 1.37

$ 1.66

$ 1.30

   Diluted

1.33

1.59

1.26

Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding

   Basic

19,221,754

19,064,516

18,799,063

   Diluted

19,721,288

19,930,376

19,441,184

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Year Ended December 31,

2000

1999

1998

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Net income

$ 26,281,086

$ 31,712,278

$ 24,436,115

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
   provided by operating activities

   Depreciation and amortization

15,379,703

11,695,862

8,129,585

   Provision for doubtful accounts

807,569

425,557

1,092,185

   Provision for inventory reserves

1,437,610

1,265,120

1,289,740

   Provision for warranty

1,308,058

1,466,176

4,048,899

   Gain on sale of fixed assets

(94,261)

(146,268)

(341,575)

   Gain on sale of equipment on operating lease

(2,142,119)

(969,845)

(956,271)

   Gain on sale of finance receivables

(438,010)

(215,730)

(278,824)

   Equity in loss (income) of joint venture

195,781

(6,096)

(74,578)

   Minority interest in earnings of subsidiary

(8,328)

.

.

(Increase) decrease in:

   Receivables

8,155,450

(6,011,492)

(11,352,173)

   Inventories

(18,901,256)

(11,136,071)

(3,717,271)

   Prepaid expenses

230,183

(1,683,262)

(703,735)

   Deferred tax asset

494,685

1,229,527

(723,156)

   Other assets

459,650

135,646

(444,725)

Increase (decrease) in:

   Accounts payable

(3,675,821)

2,025,578

2,664,949

   Customer deposits

(575,633)

(4,171,065)

4,094,466

   Accrued product warranty

(1,249,472)

(2,090,771)

(3,828,493)

   Income taxes payable

(984,131)

(329,480)

(817,515)

   Other accrued liabilities

(3,272,367)

4,113,914

5,977,639

   Foreign currency transaction (gain) loss

(120,257)

27,293

.

Net cash provided by operating activities

23,288,120

27,336,871

28,495,262

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Proceeds from sale of property and equipment - net

319,789

266,601

992,841

Expenditures for property and equipment

(21,535,875)

(28,384,787)

(18,465,257)

Proceeds from sale of equipment on operating lease

48,920,688

29,748,064

22,609,684

Expenditures for equipment on operating lease

(53,882,130)

(25,216,820)

(28,015,599)

Additions to finance receivables

(74,134,723)

(37,820,908)

(18,398,321)

Collections of finance receivables

32,368,390

390,450

365,514

Proceeds from sale of finance receivables

38,554,353

28,093,482

9,820,384

Additions to notes receivable

(52,000)

(1,421,804)

(12,386)

Repayments on notes receivable

115,773

898,811

229,454

Cash payments in connection with business
   combinations, net of cash acquired

(7,468,669)

(52,448,406)

(8,506,458)

Net cash used by investing activities

(36,794,404)

(85,895,317)

(39,380,144)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

$ 1,005,502

$ 1,364,275

$ 1,350,510

Net borrowings under revolving credit loan

16,285,337

55,788,775

3,290,000

Principal repayments of industrial bonds, loans and notes payable

(2,932,513)

(503,057)

( 614,183)

Proceeds from debt and notes payable

2,833,145

41,189

9,285,000

Net cash provided by financing activities

17,191,471

56,691,182

13,311,327

Effect of exchange rates on cash

(356,929)

239,595

.

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

3,328,258

(1,627,669)

2,426,445

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

3,725,070

5,352,739

2,926,294

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

$ 7,053,328

$ 3,725,070

$ 5,352,739

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Cash paid during the year for:

  Interest

$ 8,499,094

$ 4,425,526

$ 2,778,422

  Income taxes

$ 17,934,641

$ 20,472,411

$ 16,545,127

Tax benefits related to stock options:

  Refundable income taxes

$ 555,962

$ 856,000

$ 1,159,925

  Deferred tax asset

.

.

99,422

  Additional paid-in capital

(555,962)

(856,000)

(1,259,347)

Non-cash business combination:

  Investment in subsidiary

$ 1,576,844

$ 1,556,523

.

  Accrued liability

(1,576,844)

(1,556,523)

.

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998

.

Common Stock
Shares          Amount

Additional Paid-in Capital

Retained Earnings

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Total Shareholders Equity

Balance
December 31, 1997

18,641,160

$3,728,232

$41,787,534

$60,099,216

.

$105,614,982

Net and Comprehensive    income

.

.

.

24,436,115

.

24,436,115

Exercise of stock options,    including tax benefit

326,072

65,214

2,544,643

.

.

2,609,857

Balance
December 31, 1998

18,967,232

3,793,446

44,332,177

84,535,331

.

132,660,954

Net income

.

.

.

31,712,278

.

31,712,278

Other comprehensive income:

.

.

.

.

.

.

 Foreign currency    translation adjustment

.

.

.

.

$266,888

266,888

Comprehensive
  income

.

.

.

.

.

31,979,166

Exercise of stock options,    including tax benefit

139,609

27,922

2,189,534

.

.

2,217,456

Stock issued in business   combination

14,296

2,859

397,141

.

.

400,000

Balance
December 31, 1999

19,121,137

3,824,227

46,918,852

116,247,609

266,888

167,257,576

Net income

.

.

.

26,281,086

.

26,281,086

Other comprehensive
  income:

.

.

.

.

.

.

Foreign currency    translation adjustment

.

.

.

.

(477,186)

(477,186)

Comprehensive
  income

.

.

.

.

.

25,803,900

Exercise of stock options,    including tax benefit

198,609

39,722

1,521,742

.

.

1,561,464

Balance
December 31, 2000

19,319,746

$3,863,949

$48,440,594

$142,528,695

$(210,298)

$194,622,940

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Astec Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The Company's wholly-owned or consolidated subsidiaries at December 31, 2000 are as follows:

American Augers, Inc.

Johnson Crushers International, Inc.

Astec, Inc.

Kolberg-Pioneer, Inc.

Astec Financial Services, Inc.

Osborn Engineered Products SA (Pty) Ltd. (88%)

Astec Systems, Inc.

Production Engineered Products, Inc.

Breaker Technology, Inc.

Roadtec, Inc.

Breaker Technology Ltd.

Superior Industries of Morris, Inc.

Carlson Paving Products, Inc.

Telsmith, Inc.

CEI Enterprises, Inc.

Trencor, Inc.

Heatec, Inc.

All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company's investment in a 50% owned joint venture, Pavement Technology, Inc., is accounted for on an equity basis.

Use of Estimates - The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash Equivalents - The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with a maturity of less than three months to be cash equivalents.

Inventories - Inventories (excluding used equipment) are stated at the lower of first-in, first-out cost or market. Used equipment inventories are stated at the lower of specific unit cost or market.

Property and Equipment - Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is calculated for financial reporting purposes using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows: buildings (40 years) and equipment (3 to 10 years). Both accelerated and straight-line methods are used for tax reporting purposes.

Goodwill - Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net identifiable assets acquired. Goodwill amounts are being amortized using the straight-line method over 20 years. Accumulated goodwill amortization was approximately $5,104,000 and $3,071,000 at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets - In the event that facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of long-lived assets may be impaired, an evaluation of recoverability would be performed. If an evaluation is required, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset would be compared to the asset's carrying amount to determine if a writedown is required. If this review indicates that the assets will not be recoverable, the carrying value of the Company's assets would be reduced to their estimated market value.

Revenue Recognition - A portion of the Company's equipment sales represents equipment produced in the Company's plants under short-term contracts for a specific customer project or equipment designed to meet a customer's specific requirements. Equipment revenues are recognized in compliance with the terms and conditions of each contract, which is ordinarily at the time the equipment is shipped. Certain contracts include terms and conditions through which the Company recognizes revenues upon completion of equipment production which is subsequently stored at the Company's plant at the customer's request. Revenue is recorded on such contracts upon the customer's assumption of title and all risks of ownership. The Company has a limited number of sales accounted for as multiple-element arrangements; related revenue on each product is recognized when it is shipped, and the related service revenue is recognized when the service is performed.

Advertising Expense - The cost of advertising is expensed as incurred. The Company incurred approximately $3,478,000, $3,964,000, and $3,052,000 in advertising costs during 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.

Stock-based Compensation - The Company grants stock options for a fixed number of shares to employees with an exercise price equal to the fair value of the shares at the date of grant. The Company accounts for employee stock options in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and, accordingly, recognizes no compensation expense for the stock option grants. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-based Compensation, in 1996 and is utilizing the disclosure only option permitted by the statement for employee stock options. See Note 10.

Earnings Per Share - Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share. Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, and diluted earnings per share includes potential dilutive effects of options, warrants and convertible securities.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2000

1999

1998

.Numerator:
  Net income

$ 26,281,086

$ 31,712,278

$ 24,436,115

Denominator: 

Denominator for basic
  earnings per share

19,221,754

19,064,516

18,799,063

   Effect of dilutive securities: 

   Employee stock options

499,534

865,860

642,121

Denominator for diluted
earnings per share

19,721,288

19,930,376

19,441,184

Earnings per common share:  

  Basic

$ 1.37

$ 1.66

$ 1.30

  Diluted

$ 1.33

$ 1.59

$ 1.26

Derivatives and Hedging Activities - In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which was amended by SFAS Nos. 137 and 138, and is now required to be adopted by the Company effective January 1, 2001. Because of the Company's minimal use of derivatives, management does not anticipate that the adoption of the new statement will have a significant effect on the Company's earnings or financial position.

Shipping and Handling Fees and Cost - The Company records the cost of shipping and handling as a reduction of the fees charged for shipping and handling. These amounts are included in net sales. Revenues and expenses were $11,857,000 and $12,719,000 for 2000, $9,169,000 and $8,706,000 for 1999 and $9,139,000 and $9,122,000 for 1998, respectively.

Reclassifications - Certain amounts for 1999 and 1998 have been reclassified to conform with the 2000 presentation.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Business Combinations

The Company's acquisitions have been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting, and accordingly, the operating results of the acquired businesses are included in the Company's consolidated financial statements from the respective acquisition dates. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at estimated fair value as determined by management. That portion of the purchase price in excess of the fair market value of the net identifiable assets acquired is recorded as goodwill and is being amortized using the straight-line method over 20 years.

On August 13, 1999, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Teledyne Specialty Equipment's Construction and Mining business unit from Allegheny Teledyne, Inc. for approximately $18,900,000 in cash. The acquired business unit, having operations in both the United States and Canada, operates as Breaker Technology, Inc. in the U.S. and as Breaker Technology Ltd. in Canada ("BTI"). On October 29, 1999, the Company purchased the operating assets and liabilities of American Augers, Inc. for approximately $15,500,000 in cash and repayment of approximately $6,200,000 of debt. On November 1, 1999, the Company acquired the operating assets and liabilities of Superior Industries of Morris, Inc. ("Superior") for $17,000,000 in cash.

On October 2, 2000, the Company acquired the operating assets and liabilities of Carlson Paving Products Company, Inc. ("Carlson") for $4,170,000 cash and 144,162 shares of the Company's stock valued at approximately $1,577,000. On September 30, 2000, the Company purchased substantially all of the assets and liabilities of Osborn MMD, a Boart Longyear group operation, from Anglo Operations Limited for approximately $3,200,000 in cash. The acquired business is located in South Africa and operates as Osborn Engineered Products SA (Pty) Ltd.

A summary of the net assets acquired is as follows:

BTI

AMERICAN AUGERS

SUPERIOR

OSBORN

CARLSON

Current assets

$12,218,333

$10,826,332

$ 6,446,529

$7,634,984

$2,229,110

Property, plant and   equipment

1,847,523

2,950,450

9,256,214

1,843,815

715,884

Other assets

.

573,505

109,038

48,809

19,005

Current liabilities

(6,159,326)

(5,796,498)

(1,865,435)

(4,667,809)

(640,400)

Other liabilities

.

(6,208,004)

(1,189,218)

.

(964,365)

Goodwill

11,025,239

11,700,858

2,548,938

(1,194,292)

4,385,025

Less:  Minority interest

.

.

.

(439,861)

.

Net assets acquired excluding cash

18,931,769

14,046,643

15,306,066

3,225,646

5,744,259

Cash

.

1,445,543

1,693,934

.

2,585

Net assets acquired

$18,931,769

$15,492,186

$17,000,000

$3,225,646

$5,746,84

The following unaudited pro forma summary presents the consolidated results of operations as if the acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of each year presented. The unaudited pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and include certain adjustments, such as goodwill amortization expense and interest expense on acquisition debt. They do not purport to be indicative of the results that would have occurred had the acquisitions taken place at the beginning of the periods presented or of results which may occur in the future.

December 31,

2000

1999

Net sales

$ 549,524,000

$ 555,781,000

Income from operations

54,138,000

67,727,000

Net income

26,655,000

35,542,000

Per common share outstanding:

   Basic

$ 1.39

$ 1.86

   Diluted

$ 1.35

$ 1.78

 

3. Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following:

December 31,

2000

1999

Raw materials and parts

$ 41,783,985

$ 45,640,440

Work-in-process

27,520,881

15,884,177

Finished goods

39,574,507

31,606,965

Used equipment

17,428,455

11,710,341

Total

$ 126,307,828

$ 104,841,923

 

4. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consisted of the following:

December 31,

2000

1999

Land, land improvements and buildings

$ 72,799,811

$ 62,976,860

Equipment

101,544,216

87,918,504

Less accumulated depreciation

(55,543,607)

(44,012,938)

Land, buildings and equipment - net

118,800,420

106,882,426

Rental property:

Equipment

9,036,202

2,996,026

Less accumulated depreciation

(909,090)

(490,296)

Rental property - net

8,127,112

2,505,730

Total

$ 126,927,532

$ 109,388,156

Depreciation expense was approximately $13,347,000, $10,664,000 and $7,577,000 for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.

5. Leases

The Company leases certain land, buildings and equipment that are used in its operations. Total rental expense charged to operations under operating leases was approximately $4,054,000, $3,329,000 and $2,597,000 for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.

Minimum rental commitments for all noncancelable operating leases at December 31, 2000 are as follows:

2001

$ 3,142,000

2002

2,493,000

2003

1,755,000

2004

1,247,000

2005

60,000

Thereafter

--   

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company also leases equipment to customers under contracts generally ranging from 36 to 48 months. Rental income under such leases was $3,908,000, $2,467,000 and $1,994,000 for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.

Minimum rental payments to be received for equipment leased to others at December 31, 2000 are as follows:

2001

$ 491,852

2004

$ 267,547

2002

  337,047

2005

  280,473

2003

  267,547

Thereafter

  266,646

 

6. Long-term Debt

Long-term debt consisted of the following:

December 31,

2000

1999

Revolving credit loan of $150,000,000 at December 31, 2000, available   through November 22, 2002, at interest rates from 7.44% to 9.25% at   December 31, 2000, and at interest rates from 6.31% to 8.25% at   December 31, 1999

$ 98,700,000

$ 47,369,835

Industrial Development Revenue Bonds payable in annual installments   through 2006 at weekly negotiated interest rates

3,000,000

3,500,000

Industrial Development Revenue Bonds due in 2019 at weekly   negotiated interest rates

8,000,000

8,000,000

Industrial Development Revenue Bonds due in 2028 at weekly   negotiated interest rates

9,200,000

9,200,000

Term loan dated August 13, 1999 at the corporate base rate or 1.25%   plus the Eurodollar rate due on January 2, 2001

.

15,000,000

Term loan dated October 29, 1999 at the corporate base rate or 1.25%   plus the Eurodollar rate due on January 2, 2001

.

20,000,000

Other current notes payable

1,597,311

211,270

Total long-term debt

120,497,311

103,281,105

Less current maturities

1,986,424

595,635

Long-term debt less current maturities

$ 118,510,887

$ 102,685,470

The Company has an unsecured $150,000,000 revolving line of credit. The agreement contains borrowing sub-limits which allow the Company and its subsidiary, Astec Financial Services, Inc., to borrow up to $130,000,000 and $50,000,000 respectively, not to exceed the total commitment amount. Advances under Astec Financial's sub-limit are limited to eligible receivables as defined in the agreement. Amounts outstanding under the agreement bear interest, at the Company's option, at a rate from .25% below prime to prime plus .50%, or from .75% to 2.00% above the London Interbank Offering Rate. The interest rate applied to borrowings is based on a leverage ratio, calculated quarterly, as defined by the credit agreement. The credit agreement contains certain restrictive covenants relative to operating ratios and capital expenditures and also restricts the payment of dividends. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants related to the above loan agreement at December 31, 2000.

The aggregate of all maturities of long-term debt in each of the next five years is as follows:

2001

$ 1,986,424

   2004

$ 510,635

2002

99,245,768

   2005

510,635

2003

522,578

   Thereafter

17,721,271

For 2000, the weighted average interest rate on short-term borrowings, which includes current maturities of Industrial Revenue Bonds, was 3.52%.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

7. Retirement Benefits

The Company sponsors a defined benefit pension plan that covers all employees of its Kolberg-Pioneer subsidiary. Benefits paid under this plan are based on years of service multiplied by a monthly amount. In addition, the Company also sponsors two post-retirement medical and life insurance plans covering the employees of its Kolberg-Pioneer and Telsmith subsidiaries and retirees of its former Barber-Greene subsidiary. The Company's funding policy for all plans is to make the minimum annual contributions required by applicable regulations.

The following provides information regarding benefit obligations, plan assets and the funded status of the plans:

Pension Benefits

Other Benefits

2000

1999

2000

1999

Change in benefit obligation

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

$ 6,307,948

$ 6,948,914

$ 1,390,967

$ 1,463,502

Service cost

351,320

329,864

86,027

80,326

Interest cost

504,384

449,209

103,596

82,311

Actuarial (gain) loss

368,022

(1,077,018)

211,149

(200,982)

Participant contributions

.

.

367,665

125,109

Benefits paid

(322,371)

(343,021)

(503,904)

(159,299)

Benefit obligation at end of year

$ 7,209,303

$ 6,307,948

$ 1,655,500

$ 1,390,967

Change in plan assets

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

6,992,158

6,607,594

.

.

Actual return on plan assets

(296,982)

727,585

.

.

Benefits paid

(322,371)

(343,021)

.

.

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

$ 6,372,805

$ 6,992,158

.

.

Funded status (underfunded)

(836,498)

684,210

(1,655,500)

(1,390,967)

Unrecognized net actuarial (gain) loss

383,049

(897,149)

460,723

271,160

Prepaid (accrued) benefit cost

$ (453,449)

$ (212,939)

$(1,194,777)

$(1,119,807)

Weighted-average assumptions as of December 31

Discount rate

7.75%

6.75%

7.75%

7.42%

Expected return on plan assets

9.00%

9.00%

.

.

Rate of compensation increase

4.00%

4.00%

.

.

The weighted average annual assumed rate of increase in per capita health care costs is 12.0% for 2001 and is assumed to decrease gradually to 5.0% for 2008 and remain at that level thereafter. A 1% increase or decrease in the medical inflation rate would not have a significant effect on either the benefit obligation or the aggregate service and interest cost components of net periodic benefit cost.

Net periodic benefit cost for 2000, 1999 and 1998 included the following components:

Pension Benefits

Other Benefits

2000

1999

1998

2000

1999

1998

Components of net periodic benefit cost

Service cost

$ 351,320

$ 329,864

$ 315,111

$ 86,027

$ 80,326

$ 74,681

Interest cost

504,384

449,209

647,654

103,596

82,311

87,419

Expected return on plan assets

(614,194)

(592,008)

(797,619)

.

.

.

Amortization of prior service cost

.

.

19,614

.

.

.

Amortization of transition obligation

.

.

.

33,700

33,700

33,700

Recognized net actuarial (gain) loss

.

.

.

(12,164)

(11,180)

(205)

Curtailment/settlement loss

.

.

1,136,000

.

.

.

Net periodic benefit cost

$ 241,510

$ 187,065

$1,320,760

$ 211,159

$ 185,157

$ 195,595

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

8. Income Taxes

For financial reporting purposes, income before income taxes includes the following components:

Year Ended December 31,

2000

1999

1998

United States

$ 41,692,857

$ 51,836,482

$ 39,318,695

Foreign

1,037,997

(305,059)

243,801

Income before income taxes

$ 42,730,854

$ 51,531,423

$ 39,562,496

The provision for income taxes consisted of the following:

Year Ended December 31,

2000

1999

1998

Current

$ 15,803,033

$ 19,188,853

$ 15,849,539

Deferred provision (benefit)

638,407

630,292

(723,158)

Total provision for income taxes

$ 16,441,440

$ 19,819,145

$ 15,126,381

A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes at the statutory Federal rate to the amount provided is as follows:

Year Ended December 31,

2000

1999

1998

Tax at statutory rates

$ 14,934,626

$ 18,035,999

$ 13,846,874

Benefit from foreign sales corporation

(516,982)

(241,012)

(620,000)

State taxes, net of federal income tax benefit

1,389,290

1,578,250

1,377,000

Income taxes of other countries

66,030

(4,000)

11,000

Other items

568,476

449,908

511,507

Income taxes

$ 16,441,440

$ 19,819,145

$ 15,126,381

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial statement purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.

Significant components of the Company's deferred tax liabilities and assets are as follows:

Year Ended December 31,

2000

1999

Deferred tax assets:

   Inventory reserves

$ 2,581,700

$ 2,253,400

   Warranty reserves

1,381,700

1,262,100

   Bad debt reserves

774,300

781,200

   Other accrued expenses

4,250,000

3,758,900

Total deferred tax assets

8,987,700

8,055,600

Deferred tax liabilities:

   Property and equipment

7,933,400

6,024,200

   Other

64,400

595,400

Total deferred tax liabilities

7,997,800

6,619,600

Net deferred tax asset

$ 989,900

$ 1,436,000

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

9. Contingencies

Management has reviewed all claims and lawsuits and, upon the advice of counsel, has made adequate provision for any estimable losses. However, the Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of the outstanding claims and lawsuits.

Certain customers have financed purchases of the Company's products through arrangements in which the Company is contingently liable for customer debt aggregating approximately $18,816,000 and $11,776,000 at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. These obligations average five years in duration and have minimal risk. Astec Financial Services, Inc. sold both finance and operating leases with limited recourse, generally not exceeding 15% of the purchase price, subject to elimination of recourse responsibilities through remarketing of equipment.

Other - The Company is contingently liable under letters of credit of approximately $18,440,000 primarily related to Industrial Revenue Bonds.

10. Shareholders' Equity

The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25) and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options because, as discussed below, the alternative fair value accounting provided for under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-based Compensation, requires use of option valuation models that were not developed for use in valuing employee stock options. Under APB 25, when the exercise price of the Company's employee stock options equals or exceeds the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is generally recognized.

Under terms of the Company's stock option plans, officers and certain other employees may be granted options to purchase the Company's common stock at no less than 100% of the market price on the date the option is granted. The Company has reserved shares of common stock for exercise of outstanding non-qualified options and incentive options of officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries at prices determined by the Board of Directors. In addition, a Non-employee Directors Stock Incentive Plan has been established to allow non-employee directors to have a personal financial stake in the Company through an ownership interest. Directors may elect to receive their compensation in common stock, deferred stock or stock options. Options granted under the Non-employee Directors Stock Incentive Plan and the Executive Officer Annual Bonus Equity Election Plan vest and become fully exercisable immediately. All other options outstanding vest over 12 months. All stock options have a ten-year term. The shares reserved under the various stock option plans are as follows: (1) 1992 Stock Option Plan - 436,556, (2) 1998 Long-term Incentive Plan - 1,716,750, (3) Executive Officer Annual Bonus Equity Election Plan - 13,156 and(4) 1998 Non-employee Director Stock Plan -- 6,572.

Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is required by SFAS No. 123, and has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options under the fair value method of that Statement. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for 1998, 1999, and 2000, respectively; risk-free interest rates of 4.70% , 5.58% and 5.25%, volatility factors of the expected market price of the Company's common stock of .329, .381 and .444; and a weighted-average expected life of the option of four years.

The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models required the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.

For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting period. The Company's pro forma information follows.

Year Ended December 31,

2000

1999

1998

Pro forma net income

$ 23,156,686

$ 30,466,266

$ 23,179,000

Pro forma earnings per share:

  Basic

$ 1.20

$ 1.60

$ 1.23

  Diluted

$ 1.17

$ 1.53

$ 1.19

 

A summary of the Company's stock option activity and related information for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 follows:

Year Ended December 31,

2000

1999

1998

Options

Weighted Avg.
Exercise Price

Options

Weighted Avg.
Exercise Price

Options

Weighted Avg.
Exercise Price

Options outstanding,
  beginning of year

1,866,730

$ 17.23

1,389,800

$ 10.91

1,052,000

$ 4.64

Options granted

580,348

$ 25.58

620,161

$ 29.74

663,800

$ 17.53

Options forfeited

78,800

$ 18.59

3,895

$ 29.59

.

.

Options exercised

195,244

$ 5.12

139,336

$ 9.77

326,000

$ 4.31

Options outstanding,
  end of year

2,173,034

$ 20.53

1,866,730

$ 16.29

1,389,800

$ 10.87

The weighted average fair value of options granted whose exercise price was equal to the market price of the stock on the grant date was $25.58, $10.75 and $5.71 for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998. The weighted average fair value of options granted whose exercise price exceeded the market price of the stock on the grant date was $28.05 and $12.04 for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999. The range of exercise prices for options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2000 are as follows: 436,556 options from $1.63 to $7.43 and 1,736,478 options from $17.38 to $36.00.

The Company has adopted a Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement and declared a distribution of one right (the "Right") for each outstanding share of Company common stock, par value $0.20 per share (the "Common Stock"). Each Right entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Company one one-hundredth of a share (a "Unit") of Series A Participating Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share (the "Preferred Stock"), at a purchase price of $18.00 per Unit, subject to adjustment. The rights currently attach to the certificates representing shares of outstanding Company Common Stock, and no separate Rights certificates will be distributed. The Rights will separate from the Common Stock upon the earlier of ten business days (unless otherwise delayed by the Board) following the (i) public announcement that a person or group of affiliated or associated persons (the "Acquiring Person") has acquired, obtained the right to acquire, or otherwise obtained beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the then outstanding shares of Common Stock, or (ii) commencement of a tender offer or exchange offer that would result in an Acquiring Person beneficially owning 15% or more of the then outstanding shares of Common Stock. The Board of Directors may terminate the Rights without any payment to the holders thereof at any time prior to the close of business ten business days following announcement by the Company that a person has become an Acquiring Person. The Rights, which do not have voting power and are not entitled to dividends, expire on December 21, 2005. In the event of a merger, consolidation, statutory share exchange or other transaction in which shares of Common Stock are exchanged, each Unit of Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive the per share amount paid in respect of each share of Common Stock.

11. Financial Instruments

Credit Risk - The Company sells products to a wide variety of customers. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally does not require collateral. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts at a level which management believes is sufficient to cover potential credit losses. As of December 31, 2000, concentrations of credit risk with respect to receivables are limited due to the wide variety of customers.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments - The book value of the Company's financial instruments approximates their fair value. Financial instruments include cash, accounts receivable, finance receivables, accounts payable, long- and short-term debt and one interest rate swap agreement. Substantially all of the Company's short and long-term debt is floating rate debt and, accordingly, book value approximates its fair value.

Interest Rate Swap Agreement - In order to mitigate exposure to interest rate fluctuations, the Company's captive finance subsidiary, Astec Financial Services,Inc. ("AFS") entered into an interest rate swap agreement on April 6, 2000, to fix interest rates on variable rate debt. The swap agreement is effective for five years with a notional amount of $7,500,000. At December 31, 2000, the fair value of the swap agreement was ($363,000).

12. Operations by Industry Segment and Geographic Area

The Company has four reportable operating segments. These segments are combinations of business units that offer different products and services. The business units are each managed separately because they manufacture and distribute distinct products that require different marketing strategies. A brief description of each segment is as follows:

Asphalt Group - This segment consists of three operating units that design, manufacture and market a complete line of portable, stationary and relocatable hot-mix asphalt plants and related components and a variety of heaters, heat transfer processing equipment and thermal fluid storage tanks. The principal purchasers of these products are asphalt producers, highway and heavy equipment contractors and foreign and domestic governmental agencies.

Aggregate and Mining Group - This segment consists of eight operating units that design, manufacture and market a complete line of rock crushers, feeders, conveyors, screens and washing equipment. The principal purchasers of these products are open mine and quarry operators.

Mobile Asphalt Paving Group - This segment consists of two operating units that design, manufacture and market asphalt pavers, asphalt material transfer vehicles, milling machines and paver screeds . The principal purchasers of these products are highway and heavy equipment contractors and foreign and domestic governmental agencies.

Underground Group - This segment consists of two companies that design, manufacture and market auger boring machines, directional drills, fluid/mud systems, chain and wheel trenching equipment, rock saws, road miners and material processing equipment. The principal purchasers of these products are pipeline and utility contractors.

All Others - This category consists of the Company's three other business units, including the parent company, Astec Industries, Inc., that do not meet the requirements for separate disclosure as an operating segment. Revenues in this category are derived primarily from operating leases owned by the Company's finance subsidiary.

The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on profit or loss from operations before federal income taxes and corporate overhead. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies.

Intersegment sales and transfers are valued at prices comparable to those for unrelated parties. For management purposes, the Company does not allocate Federal income taxes or corporate overhead (including interest expense related to the Company's revolving line of credit) to its business units.

Asphalt Group

Aggregate
and Mining
Group

Mobile Asphalt
Paving Group

Underground
Group

All Others

Total

Revenues from external    customers

$187,823,335

$190,931,429

$ 63,268,136

$ 75,748,060

$ 2,916,891

$520,687,851

Intersegment revenues

13,427,266

21,024,808

120,618

504,963

3,051,983

38,129,638

Interest expense

4,742

769,003

175,634

340,583

7,362,378

8,652,340

Depreciation and   amortization

4,774,154

5,078,301

1,629,792

2,082,141

1,815,315

15,379,703

Segment profit

17,996,985

18,367,234

8,343,809

6,835,885

(25,515,926)

26,027,987

Segment assets

167,042,229

202,701,018

58,826,228

59,934,607

262,897,237

751,401,319

Capital expenditures

8,562,340

6,819,029

1,602,651

3,336,470

470,534

20,791,024

Segment information for 1999

Asphalt Group

Aggregate
and Mining
Group

Mobile Asphalt
Paving Group

Underground
Group

All Others

Total

Revenues from external    customers

$192,525,695

$155,199,535

$ 67,374,684

$ 31,510,153

$ 3,017,390

$449,627,457

Intersegment revenues

8,947,300

10,636,735

.

936,882

2,643,437

23,164,354

Interest expense

57,447

683,404

93,875

289,569

3,128,924

4,253,219

Depreciation and amortization

4,153,143

3,049,886

1,274,471

995,609

2,222,753

11,695,862

Segment profit

25,449,090

18,198,871

11,200,103

988,904

(25,299,553)

30,537,415

Segment assets

150,032,995

184,015,782

43,619,752

52,280,067

238,563,925

668,512,521

Capital expenditures

8,962,862

10,883,070

3,442,706

2,155,055

5,435,997

30,879,690

Segment information for 1998

Asphalt Group

Aggregate
and Mining
Group

Mobile Asphalt
Paving Group

Underground
Group

All Others

Total

Revenues from external    customers

$163,234,857

$ 112,705,508

$ 60,324,759

$ 29,590,375

$ (1,910,308)

$363,945,191

Intersegment revenues

11,316,496

7,039,559

662,270

.

7,952,842

26,971,167

Interest expense

10,397

333,186

38,698

342,748

1,983,952

2,708,981

Depreciation and    amortization

3,236,621

1,662,560

1,019,281

874,428

1,336,695

8,129,585

Segment profit

21,565,578

12,961,727

9,890,188

2,039,242

(20,839,063)

25,617,672

Segment assets

129,794,248

115,980,822

35,649,089

22,702,313

166,343,381

470,469,853

Capital expenditures

10,899,368

4,930,963

2,347,673

841,040

358,697

19,377,741

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Reconciliations of the reportable segment totals for revenues, profit or loss, assets, interest expense, depreciation and amortization and capital expenditures to the Company's consolidated totals are as follows:

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2000

1999

1998

Sales: 

Total external sales for reportable segments

$ 517,770,960

$ 446,610,067

$ 365,855,499

Intersegment sales for reportable segments

35,077,655

20,520,917

19,018,325

Other sales

5,968,874

5,660,827

6,042,534

Elimination of intersegment sales

(38,129,638)

(23,164,354)

(26,971,167)

Total consolidated sales

$ 520,687,851

$ 449,627,457

$ 363,945,191

Profit: 

Total profit for reportable segments

$ 51,543,913

$ 55,836,968

$ 46,456,735

Other (loss)

(25,515,926)

(25,299,553)

(20,839,063)

Equity in (loss) income of joint venture

(195,781)

6,096

74,578

Minority interest in earnings of subsidiary

(8,328)

.

Elimination of intersegment profit

457,208

1,168,767

(1,256,135)

Total consolidated net income

$ 26,281,086

$ 31,712,278

$ 24,436,115

Assets: 

Total assets for reportable segments

$ 488,504,082

$ 429,948,596

$ 304,126,472

Other assets

262,897,237

239,460,432

166,343,381

Elimination of intercompany profit in inventory and   leased equipment

(246,280)

(1,241,297)

(2,410,064)

Elimination of intercompany receivables

(144,200,101)

(172,653,814)

(118,730,950)

Elimination of investment in subsidiaries

(141,254,918)

(118,643,805)

(84,228,341)

Other eliminations

(63,394,201)

(21,433,081)

(16,780,222)

Total consolidated assets

$ 402,305,819

$ 355,437,031

$ 248,320,276

Interest expense:

 .

 .

 .

Total interest expense for reportable segments

$ 1,289,962

$ 1,124,295

$ 725,029

Other interest expense

7,362,378

3,128,924

1,983,952

Total consolidated interest expense

$ 8,652,340

$ 4,253,219

$ 2,708,981

Depreciation and amortization:

Total depreciation and amortization for reportable   segments

$ 13,564,388

$ 9,473,109

$ 6,792,890

Other depreciation and amortization

1,815,315

2,222,753

1,336,695

Total consolidated depreciation and amortization

$ 15,379,703

$ 11,695,862

$ 8,129,585

Capital expenditures:

Total capital expenditures for reportable segments

$ 20,320,490

$ 25,443,693

$ 19,019,044

Other capital expenditures

470,534

5,435,997

358,697

Total consolidated capital expenditures (excluding   those for equipment leased to others)

$ 20,791,024

$ 30,879,690

$ 19,377,741

 

International sales by domestic subsidiaries by major geographic region were as follows:

Year Ended December 31,

2000

1999

1998

Asia

$ 1,589,937

$ 2,814,288

$ 5,363,481

Southeast Asia

2,824,572

808,771

2,214,930

Europe

7,137,599

7,148,982

3,471,656

South America

2,984,187

4,280,998

20,712,903

Canada

14,950,621

12,694,606

12,072,217

Australia

6,598,660

962,743

1,467,738

Africa

8,044,463

1,434,304

2,668,923

Central America

15,557,104

9,995,037

11,893,005

Middle East

205,300

1,080,697

6,164,493

West Indies

3,018,152

4,365,563

3,176,713

Other

588,325

209,208

308,542

Total

$63,498,920

$45,795,197

$69,514,601

 

13. Finance Receivables

Finance receivables are receivables of Astec Financial Services, Inc. Contractual maturities of outstanding receivables at December 31, 2000 were:

Amounts Due In

Financing Leases

Notes

Total

2001

$ 7,646,289

$ 11,894,736

$ 19,541,025

2002

817,038

981,998

1,799,036

2003

686,751

758,896

1,445,647

2004

477,679

321,115

798,794

2005

454,840

208,223

663,063

Thereafter

1,980,000

284,498

2,264,498

Total

$12,062,597

$14,449,466

$26,512,063

Receivables may be paid prior to contractual maturity generally by payment of a prepayment penalty. At December 31, 2000, there were no impaired loans or leases. Recognition of income on finance receivables is suspended when management determines that collection of future income is not probable. Accrual is resumed if the receivable becomes contractually current and collection doubts are removed. Previously suspended income is recognized at that time.

 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Astec Industries, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Astec Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Astec Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Chattanooga, Tennessee
February 23, 2001

 

 

 


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Astec Industries, Inc.


 We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Astec Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 14(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Astec Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Ernst & Young, LLP
Chattanooga, Tennessee
February 23, 2001

 

A-24

 


 
ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE (II)
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000, 1999 AND 1998

 
 
 
DESCRIPTION

 
BEGINNING
BALANCE

ADDITIONS
CHARGES TO
COSTS &
EXPENSES

 
OTHER
ADDITIONS

 
 
DEDUCTIONS

 
ENDING
BALANCE

December 31, 2000

Reserves deducted from assets to which they apply:

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 
$1,966,251

 
$807,569

 
$105,000 (3)

 
$773,820 (1)

 
$2,105,000

Reserve for inventory

$5,131,175

$1,437,610

$830,000 (3)

$1,135,029

$6,263,756

Other Reserves:
Product warranty

 
$4,075,358

 
$1,308,058

 
$322,871 (3)

 
$1,264,442 (2)

 
$4,441,845

  

December 31, 1999

Reserves deducted from assets to which they apply:

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 
$1,460,000

 
$425,557

 
$287,854 (3)

 
$207,160 (1)

 
$1,966,251

Reserve for inventory

$3,683,292

$1,265,120

$1,639,600 (3)

$1,456,837

$5,131,175

Other Reserves:
Product warranty

 
$3,624,252

 
$1,466,176

 
$1,075,700 (3)

 
$2,090,770 (2)

 
$4,075,358

 

December 31, 1998:

Reserves deducted from assets to which they apply:

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 
$1,553,237

 
$1,092,185

 
$ 0

 
$1,185,422 (1)

 
$1,460,000

Reserve for inventory

$4,328,170

$1,289,740

$ 0

$1,934,618

$3,683,292

Other Reserves:
Product warranty

 
$3,206,372

 
$4,048,899

 
$ 0

 
$ 3,631,019 (2)

 
$3,624,252

 

 

(1) Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries.
(2) Warranty costs charged to the reserve.
(3) Represents reserve balances of subsidiaries acquired in the year.
 

 


Schedule (II)
A-25

 


 
SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Astec Industries, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.

 

BY: /s/ J. Don Brock

J. Don Brock, Chairman of the Board and
President (Principal Executive Officer)

 

BY: /s/ F. McKamy Hall

F. McKamy Hall, Chief Financial Officer,
Vice President, and Treasurer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

Date: March 23, 2001

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by a majority of the Board of Directors of the Registrant on the dates indicated:

SIGNATURE

TITLE

DATE

 

/s/ J. Don Brock
J. Don Brock

Chairman of the Board and President

March 23, 2001

/s/ Albert E. Guth
Albert E. Guth

President, Astec Financial Services, Inc. and Director

March 23, 2001

/s/ W. Norman Smith
W. Norman Smith

President - Astec, Inc. and Director, Group Vice President Asphalt -

March 23, 2001

/s/ Robert G. Stafford
Robert G. Stafford

Vice President, Aggregates Processing Group and Director

March 23, 2001

/s/ J. Wade Gilley
J. Wade Gilley

Director

March 23, 2001

/s/ William B. Sansom
William B. Sansom

Director

March 23, 2001

/s/ Ronald W. Dunmire
Ronald W. Dunmire

Director

March 23, 2001

/s/ Robert H. West
Robert H. West

Director

March 23, 2001

/s/ William D. Gehl
William D. Gehl

Director

March 23, 2001

/s/ Daniel K. Frierson
Daniel K. Frierson

Director

March 23, 2001

/s/ Robert Dressler
R
obert Dressler

Director

March 23, 2001

 
 

 

Commission File No. 0-14714

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

EXHIBITS FILED WITH ANNUAL REPORT

ON FORM 10-K

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000

 

ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.

4101 Jerome Avenue

Chattanooga, Tennessee 37407

 

 


ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.
FORM 10-K
INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit Number

Description

10.33

Sale of Business Agreement, dated September 29, 2000, between Anglo Operations Limited and High Mast Properties 18 Limited and Astec Industries, Inc. for the purchase of the materials handling and processing products division of the Boart-Longyear Division of Anglo Operations Limited.

10.34

Acquisition Agreement, dated October 2, 2000, by and among Larry Raymond, Carlson Paving Products, Inc. and Astec Industries, Inc.

10.35

Collective Bargaining Agreement, dated February 1, 2001, by and between Trencor, Inc. and the United States Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO and CLC.

Exhibit 22

Subsidiaries of the registrant.

Exhibit 23

Consent of independent auditors.