AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON MARCH 29, 2005

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

(MARK ONE)

(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

96 CUMMINGS POINT ROAD, STAMFORD, CONNECTICUT

(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)

06902

(ZIP CODE)

(203) 358-8000

(REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)

NOT APPLICABLE

Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

As of June 30, 2004, the aggregate market value of the Common Stock outstanding and held by nonaffiliates (without admitting that any person whose shares are not included in such calculation is an affiliate) was approximately $5.5 million and the aggregate market value of the Series I Preferred Stock outstanding and held by nonaffiliates (without admitting that any person whose shares are not included in such calculation is an affiliate) was approximately $8.4 million. In each case, the market value of outstanding securities was based on the closing price of such securities as reported by the NASDAQ SmallCap Stock Market.

The Exhibit index is located on page 53 of this filing.

Part III incorporates certain information by reference to registrant's Proxy Statement for its 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

FORM 10-K CROSS REFERENCE INDEX

COMPANY OVERVIEW

The Aristotle Corporation ("Aristotle") and its subsidiaries (together with Aristotle, the "Company"), founded in 1986, and headquartered in Stamford, CT, is a leading manufacturer and global distributor of educational, health, medical technology and agricultural products. A selection of over 80,000 items is offered, primarily through more than 45 separate catalogs carrying the brand of Nasco (founded in 1941), as well as those bearing the brands of Life/Form®, Whirl-Pak®, Simulaids, Triarco, Summit Learning, Hubbard Scientific, Scott Resources, Spectrum Educational Supplies, Haan Crafts, To-Sew, CPR Prompt® and Ginsberg Scientific. Products include educational materials and supplies for substantially all K-12 curricula, molded plastics, biological materials and items for the agricultural, senior care and food industries. In addition, the Company offers simulation kits and manikins used for training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the fire and emerge ncy rescue and patient care fields. The Company also markets proprietary product lines that provide exclusive distribution rights throughout all of its catalogs. The proprietary product lines are developed internally through the Company's research and development efforts and acquired externally by licensing rights from third parties.

Prior to June 17, 2002, Aristotle was a holding company which, through its subsidiaries, Simulaids, Inc. ("Simulaids") and Safe Passage International, Inc. ("Safe Passage"), conducted business in two segments, the medical education and training products market and the computer-based training market. On June 17, 2002, Aristotle merged (the "Merger") with Nasco International, Inc. ("Nasco"), an indirect subsidiary of Geneve Corporation ("Geneve"), a privately-held diversified financial holding company. Pursuant to the Merger, the separate corporate existence of Nasco ceased and Aristotle was the surviving entity. Immediately following the Merger, Aristotle's business was comprised of the operations of the Nasco group of companies, Simulaids and Safe Passage. Due to the relative sizes of the parties and conditions to the Merger, the transaction was accounted for as a reverse acquisition using the purchase method of accounting under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). Accordingly, for accounting and reporting purposes, Nasco is deemed to be the acquiring company, and financial information reported for periods prior to the Merger is that of Nasco. In applying purchase accounting to the Merger, the assets and liabilities of Aristotle were adjusted to their fair market values at June 17, 2002. This included recognition of a significant deferred tax asset of approximately $30.7 million, which was principally attributable to Aristotle's Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards. As a result of such recognition, Aristotle's pre-merger goodwill and long-term assets of $8.3 million were reduced to zero and negative goodwill of $20.2 million was recognized as an extraordinary gain at the Merger date.

On September 17, 2004, Aristotle purchased certain assets of the science product line of Ginsberg Scientific Company and GSC International, Inc. (collectively referred to as "Ginsberg") for $1.8 million. Ginsberg is a manufacturer and distributor of products and kits designed to demonstrate certain science concepts for students in grades 5-12. The Ginsberg offerings complement the science product lines manufactured and distributed by the Company in the educational segment. The results of Ginsberg's operations have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements since the date of such acquisition. The purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill of $1.0 million attributable to the educational segment.

On August 11, 2004, Aristotle purchased certain assets of the CPR Prompt product line from Cardiac Science, Inc. for $1.9 million. The CPR Prompt product line is comprised of a number of products, primarily training manikins, used in the instruction of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The CPR Prompt product line complements product lines manufactured and distributed by the Company in the educational segment. The results of CPR Prompt's operations have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements since the date of such acquisition. The purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill of $1.0 million attributable to the educational segment.

1

On May 31, 2003, Aristotle purchased 100% of the outstanding capital stock of Haan Crafts Corporation ("Haan"). Haan is a manufacturer and catalog distributor of sewing kits used in middle school and junior high school family and consumer science classrooms. The acquisition complemented the Company's existing product lines in the educational segment. The results of Haan's operations have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements since the date of such acquisition. The aggregate purchase price, net of cash acquired, was $5.3 million, including $3.5 million of cash and $1.8 million in seller financing, which was subsequently retired by the Company. The purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill of $3.9 million attributable to the educational segment. In connection with the acquisition of Haan, Aristotle entered into a $1.2 million capital lease with the seller on a building facility ("Haan Building Facility"). On February 12, 2004, the Company settled the ca pital lease on the Haan Building Facility for $1.1 million.

On May 31, 2003, Aristotle acquired 100% of the outstanding ownership interests in NHI, LLC ("NHI") from Nasco Holdings, Inc. ("Holdings"), a subsidiary of Geneve. The sole purpose of NHI is the ownership and management of warehouse and office facilities, which had previously been leased to Aristotle. In connection with the purchase of NHI, Aristotle paid to Holdings an amount equal to the book value of NHI, which included a $3.6 million mortgage related to the properties held by NHI. On August 6, 2004, the Company paid $3.4 million, including interest, in full settlement of this mortgage.

On December 31, 2002, Aristotle sold its 80% ownership interest in Safe Passage in exchange for certain contingent payments. It is unlikely that contingent payments, if any, which are payable through 2008 and based upon the financial performance of Safe Passage, will be material to the financial statements.

In April 2001, Nasco acquired 100% of the stock ownership of Spectrum Educational Supplies, Ltd. ("Spectrum"), a Canadian provider of educational products, for $5.2 million in cash. In March 2001, Nasco completed the stock acquisition for $5.3 million in cash of that portion of American Educational Products, Inc. ("AMEP"), a manufacturer and distributor of math and science products, which it did not already own.

The Company operates in two business segments: educational and commercial. The contribution of each business segment to net sales and gross profit, and the identifiable assets attributable to each business segment are set forth in Note 16 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

The Company's educational segment consists primarily of the sale of supplemental educational supplies and equipment to school districts, individual schools, teachers and curriculum specialists, who purchase products primarily for classroom use.

In addition to its business in the school supply market, the Company, through its Nasco Life/Form, Simulaids and CPR Prompt product lines, sells medical technology training products including manikins and simulation kits used for training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the emergency rescue and patient care fields. The Company's primary users of its health care training products are fire and emergency medical departments, and nursing and medical schools.

The Company markets agricultural supplies and small hand tools and equipment to farmers and ranchers to assist in animal livestock and crop production.

In addition, the Company provides sterile sampling bags and containers worldwide under the Whirl-Pak trademark. The product line is primarily sold in the food industry, including water treatment facilities. The product line provides a stable vehicle for the containment and transporting of food and water samples to laboratories without threat of sample contamination.

In the senior care industry, the Company offers a broad selection of products used by nursing home and senior care facilities to support therapy programs.

2

Factors that contribute to the expansion of the education sector include:

• increases in elementary and secondary school enrollment which, according to the U.S. Department of Education, is projected to grow by 4% to 56 million by the year 2013;

The traditional school model of lectures, workbooks, written assignments and text memorization has been criticized for failing to engage students, as opposed to methods that emphasize active learning techniques. The prevailing inclination among educators to use manipulatives, models, or other hands-on tools places the Company within a particularly favorable segment of the already well-positioned education industry.

According to the U.S. Department of Education, there are approximately 15,000 school districts, 119,000 elementary and secondary schools, 3 million teachers and 54 million students in the United States. The Company believes that American school systems have shown a clear trend toward decentralization, which enables school teachers and administrators at the school to make many of the key decisions regarding instruction methods and school purchases. Administrators for both school districts and individual schools usually make the decision to purchase the general school supplies needed to operate the school. Teachers and curriculum specialists generally decide on curriculum-specific products for use in their classrooms and individual disciplines. In prior years, larger government agencies usually made these decisions for entire school districts or states. Under the new structure, teachers and curriculum specialists have the ability to choose the curricular materials that the teachers need to teach effectively. Site-based management is forcing the industry to rethink its sales and marketing strategies in order to address the added challenge and added cost of delivering goods and services to an increasingly decentralized marketplace. In terms of purchasing methods, direct mail ordering by catalog, as well as the internet, are on the rise as purchasing mechanisms among administrators in charge of budgets.

The industry is also highly fragmented with a substantial number of direct marketers of supplemental educational supplies, many of which are family- or employee-owned businesses that operate in a single geographic region. The Company believes the increasing demand for single-source suppliers, prompt order fulfillment and competitive pricing, along with the related need for suppliers to invest in automated inventory and electronic ordering systems are fostering consolidation within the industry. Increased purchasing at the school and classroom levels, which increases individual schools' and teachers' roles in educational supply procurement decisions, is also driving this trend. The Company's extensive selection of products and vendors allows it to offer an extensive selection of products for each product line. The Company believes that by having available to school teachers and administrators all of the items they need in one place, the inclination to search other sources is reduced. T his "one stop shopping" approach is the Company's hallmark.

3

Moreover, the Company seeks to be competitive with its catalog prices rather than offering large discounts to single customers. With many products, two or more choices are offered in order to give customers a lower price point with a product that will meet their budget yet perform to required standards.

In the Canadian educational market, the provincial government is responsible for the funding, curriculum and other standards of elementary and secondary educational programs. During 2003, the Canadian economy was adversely affected by an outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ("SARS"), a case of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy ("Mad Cow Disease" or "BSE"), and a provincial power outage, resulting in budget deficits and decreased educational spending. Management believes these shortfalls in provincial budgets will be reduced as the Canadian economy improves, eventually resulting in increased expenditures on education. In addition, the Canadian economy is impacted by the overall conditions of the U.S. economy.

The health and medical education teaching aids industry is highly competitive. The Company competes for customers with numerous manufacturers of well-known brands of teaching products. The principal competitive factors in the health and medical education teaching aids market are quality, price and design of products, engineering and customer service. Although some of the Company's competitors have greater financial and other resources, and are, therefore, able to expend more resources than the Company in areas such as marketing and business development, the Company believes that it is aggressively marketing its products and competing in an effective manner.

The United States Department of Agriculture indicates that there are approximately two million farms in the U.S. The Company not only markets to various groups within this total but its catalog is also directed to the "hobby farmer" as well. One of the largest groups marketed to is the "Dairy Farmer." As the number of farms declines, which is a national trend, the remaining farms are becoming larger. With its extensive farm catalog offering, the Company is well positioned to supply the market with the types of supplies and small hand tools and equipment needed.

Commercial distribution of sterile sampling bags and containers experienced growth in recent years as food and water quality standards gained emphasis in global markets. Product lines offered by the Company in this segment are key tools in measuring and enforcing government standards at water treatment facilities, and have gained a role in meat and other food-related industries. International sales growth for these product lines is driven by a developing consciousness of water quality standards in third-world countries. Domestically, the food industry is challenged with additional testing requirements for meat, poultry and fruit products in reaction to biosecurity risks. These increasing government regulations and growing product liability exposures should continue expansion in the amount and frequency of product sampling.

In the senior care market, the expectations of government funding cuts in the upcoming Medicare and Medicaid budgets for nursing home payments are again a cause of concern for the Company. According to McKnight's Long-Term Care News, President Bush's proposed fiscal year 2006 budget would cut Medicare reimbursements to nursing homes by $10 billion over a five-year period. Recognizing that governmental funding for the senior care market may be limited for the next several years, the Company has targeted its product offering to service the more basic fundamental activity needs for these customers.

GROWTH STRATEGY

Key members of the Company's management team develop and execute multiple action plans in an effort to continue the Company's historically steady growth in sales and earnings. These action plans are continuously monitored by senior management to assess the progress in achieving the planned goals. The principal action plans are as follows:

• Continue strategic evaluation and execution of complementary acquisitions in existing market segments.

4

• continued expansion into the Canadian educational markets through Spectrum by supplementing existing Canadian catalogs with Nasco product lines; and

The Company markets the following product lines through its various catalogs and websites, including www.eNASCO.com, www.summitlearning.com, www.to-sew.com, www.triarcoarts.com, www.bentonkirby.com, www.creative-ed.com, www.goodtimeattractions.com, www.shnta.com, www.spectrumed.com, www.haan.com, www.simulaids.com, www.cprprompt.com and www.gscscientific.com.

5

The Company offers a wide variety of products, both proprietary products and products manufactured by others, primarily through catalogs distributed to customers throughout the United States and internationally. The Company also sells products through distributors. Additionally, many of the Company's products are available for sale on its websites. Within the Company's current markets served, research is conducted by sales and marketing personnel to identify needed products. The Company often hires consultants or sales directors from the niche served. The Company's catalog teams continually search for new, improved and unique products. Catalog teams pursue sales growth goals through efforts to present more than 6,000 catalog pages with broad selections of popular and new products at competitive catalog prices, and with choices of similar types of products with different price points, qualities, or features. If the Company is unable to find products to meet a spec ified demand, it has the option of attempting to manufacture the product in its own plants or contract manufacturing under a private label.

The Company attempts to time the distribution of catalogs to meet the peak buying periods and mails the catalogs to the individuals whom the Company believes make the buying decision. The Company's experience indicates that the actual user of the materials usually makes the buying decision, except for those items that are a part of school bid requests. The Company's mailing concentrates on putting the catalog in the hands of these decision makers. All catalogs are annually reviewed for revision. The Company's bid request goal is also competitively priced. The Company issues most major catalogs annually to over three million potential customers. The Company relies mainly on its more than 45 separate catalogs as its "sales staff," which relieves the need for expensive sales calls on customers.

In recent years, the Company has expanded its efforts in international markets outside of North America, primarily in the health care and agricultural product lines. While international sales represent less than 8% of 2004 total net sales, the acceptance of product lines by international markets has been a significant growth contributor for these particular product lines.

Orders are received via mail, phone, facsimile, or internet. The Company aims to exceed customer expectations based on customers' directions. The Company's business is transacted by open order and purchase orders. The Company ships many orders the same day received and most orders are shipped within three days. Sale terms are typically net 30 days.

The Company is not dependent upon a single customer, or a few customers. Therefore, the loss thereof would not have a material adverse effect on the Company or either of its business segments.

Substantial portions of the products distributed by the Company are purchased from manufacturers and distributors worldwide. The Company's purchasing staff is in contact with over 6,000 vendors to insure awareness of new products, timely delivery and competitive pricing. With its broad range of vendors, including alternative product sources, the Company does not generally maintain contractual fulfillment agreements for purchase quantity commitments. Vendors often review catalog pages and make suggestions for the following year's offering. Alternate vendors are reviewed on a continuous basis. To broaden its product mix to meet specific customer needs, the Company operates manufacturing facilities that produce proprietary items. Sales of proprietary products generally result in a higher profit margin and enable the Company to sell such products at wholesale in the U.S. and foreign markets where the Company often develops distribution relationships. The Company has historically been able to obtain sufficient quantities of the raw materials necessary for the manufacture of proprietary products.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

The Company has a number of trademarks and trade names that it applies to various product lines such as Nasco, Life/Form, Whirl-Pak and CPR Prompt. Except for the "Nasco" trademark, the various trademarks and trade names are not considered material or vital to on-going business operations. To protect the unique product lines developed, the Company has applied for and received patents for five product lines, four in the U.S. and one in Canada. The Company also has applied for three additional U.S. patents. None of these issued or pending patents are considered vital or material to on-going business operations.

6

Although there are several large general school suppliers and wholesale and retail stores which compete with the Company, the Company believes that it offers more specialty items in more disciplines in the educational, health, medical technology and agricultural markets than any competitor. Although the Company faces competition with regard to each of its catalogs from businesses that specialize in limited numbers of curriculum subjects or markets, few, if any, of the Company's competitors have as broad a range of products that serve as many market areas.

The Company's main computer system, housed in Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin, is an IBM AS 400 computer. The Company's business is highly computerized, with almost all functions including accounting, order processing, purchasing, quotes, phone orders, billing, receivables, payables and warehousing running on this system. The system is routinely upgraded, increasing capacity to handle the Company's needs. To facilitate and continuously improve the software system, a staff of programmers responds to suggestions from all departments and management.

Catalog preparation is primarily handled in Fort Atkinson. A staff of graphic artists and editors works with Macintosh desktop publishing systems to complete all production work in-house, with the exception of printing.

EMPLOYEES

At December 31, 2004, the Company had approximately 800 employees. In addition, the Company engages approximately 180 temporary employees to accommodate the peak business season during the summer months. All employees at all locations are employed at-will and none are represented by a labor union.

The Company leases approximately 1,000 square feet of executive office space in Stamford, Connecticut from Geneve, the Company's majority stockholder.

The Company's primary distribution center is located in Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin. The approximately 220,000 square foot owned distribution center is the headquarters for all Nasco marketing efforts. An approximately 5,000 square foot graphic arts center houses the creative staff and equipment for the maintenance of the catalog pages. The Company also leases approximately 45,000 square feet of manufacturing space to support the catalog product lines. The Company owns approximately 300,000 square feet of adjacent warehouse space and 40,000 square feet of adjacent office space. The Company currently occupies approximately 200,000 square feet of the warehouse space, and leases the office space and remaining warehouse space to a third party under lease agreements expiring on various dates in the next year. These facilities afford the Company the necessary expansion capacity for the foreseeable future. In 2003, the Company became the owner of these facilities as a result of the acquisitio n of 100% of the outstanding interest in NHI from Holdings. For more information regarding this and other acquisitions of the Company, please refer to the "Acquisitions and Divestitures" section above.

To service the western United States, the Company owns and operates an approximately 68,000 square foot distribution center in Modesto, California. This distribution center services all Nasco catalogs for customers in the 12 western states.

The Company operates its Triarco arts and crafts catalog operation, along with three other independent catalogs, from an approximately 4,000 square foot leased office facility in Plymouth, Minnesota. The distribution center in Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin services these catalogs.

The Company also maintains an educational materials catalog distribution center in Fort Collins, Colorado from an approximately 18,000 square foot owned facility. From this location and approximately 39,000 square feet of leased facilities in Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin, the Company's AMEP and Ginsberg product lines service math and science teachers and distributors worldwide. Light manufacturing operations are situated at both of these locations, producing mainly proprietary items.

An approximately 83,000 square foot owned facility located in Newmarket, Ontario, Canada, currently operates as a distribution center of educational and commercial supplies sold by Spectrum via catalog mailings to schools and businesses throughout Canada.

7

The Company owns two buildings comprising approximately 50,000 square feet of office and manufacturing space in Woodstock, New York. The Company also leases approximately 8,000 square feet of nearby warehouse space. The Company produces manikins and simulation kits used for training in the health care field at this location for its Simulaids operations. In 2005, the Company intends to purchase land in Saugerties, New York for approximately $.6 million for the construction of an approximately 83,000 square foot office and warehouse facility to be utilized in its Simulaids operations. It is estimated that the construction cost of the facility will be approximately $4.9 million. The Company anticipates completing construction by the fourth quarter of 2005. The Company intends to sell the current Simulaids facility following commencement of operations at the new facility.

The Company owns an approximately 43,000 square foot light manufacturing and distribution facility in Otterbein, Indiana. The Company produces sewing kits used in middle school and junior high school family and consumer science classrooms at this location for its Haan operations.

The locations in Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin; Modesto, California; Plymouth, Minnesota; and Newmarket, Ontario, Canada service both of the Company's business segments. The locations in Fort Collins, Colorado; Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin; Woodstock, New York; and Otterbein, Indiana service the Company's educational segment.

Certain of the Company's owned properties, including the primary distribution center in Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin and owned properties located in Modesto, California; Fort Collins, Colorado; and Otterbein, Indiana, are each subject to a mortgage in favor of the Company's principal lender, Bank One, NA, as additional security pursuant to a Revolving Credit Facility entered into by the Company on October 15, 2003. For more information regarding this Revolving Credit Facility, please refer to Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

The Company is not a party to any material legal proceedings.

No matters were submitted to a vote of the Company's security holders during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2004.

The Company's Common Stock is quoted on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market under the symbol "ARTL." The table below sets forth inter-dealer quotations and do not include retail markups, markdowns or commissions and may not represent actual transactions. The high and low sale prices per share of Common Stock on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market (as reported by NASDAQ) during the fiscal quarters indicated are set forth below.

8

The Company's Series I Preferred Stock is quoted on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market under the symbol "ARTLP." The table below sets forth inter-dealer quotations and do not include retail markups, markdowns or commissions and may not represent actual transactions. The high and low sale prices per share of Series I Preferred Stock (as reported by NASDAQ) during the fiscal quarters indicated are set forth below.

The Series J $6.00 non-convertible, non-voting cumulative 12% preferred stock, par value $.01 per share ("Series J Preferred Stock") is privately-held and no trading market exists for such shares.

As of March 23, 2005, there were approximately 2,101 holders of record of the Company's Common Stock and approximately 1,983 holders of record of the Company's Series I Preferred Stock.

The Company has not paid any cash dividends on its Common Stock since its inception and does not intend to pay any cash dividends on its Common Stock in the foreseeable future.

Dividends on the Company's Series I Preferred Stock and Series J Preferred Stock are payable on March 31 and September 30, if and when declared by the Company's Board of Directors. For each of 2004 and 2003, the Company paid semi-annual dividends of $.33 and $.36 per share on its outstanding shares of Series I Preferred Stock and Series J Preferred Stock, respectively.

On March 1, 2005, the Company announced that it had declared a cash dividend of $.33 and $.36 per share, respectively, on its outstanding shares of Series I Preferred Stock and Series J Preferred Stock. Such dividends are payable on March 31, 2005, to holders of record on March 15, 2005.

On June 17, 2002, in connection with the Merger, the Company issued shares of its Series J Preferred Stock to Holdings. In addition, following the Series I Preferred Stock dividend paid on the Company's Common Stock, on the date of the Merger, Geneve exchanged its shares of Series I Preferred Stock for an identical number of shares of Series J Preferred Stock. The shares of Series J Preferred Stock were issued in reliance upon an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended ("Securities Act") as a private placement of securities under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. No underwriter was involved in the issuance of the Series J Preferred Stock or the exchange of the Series I Preferred Stock for the Series J Preferred Stock.

9

The following table summarizes the Company's Equity Compensation Plans as of December 31, 2004:

The selected consolidated financial data presented below should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company, together with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included elsewhere in this report.

10

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA (1) (2)

1. As a result of the accounting for the Merger, the selected consolidated financial data set forth above for periods prior to June 17, 2002 (the date of the Merger) represent the historical information for Nasco. For periods following the Merger, the financial data set forth above represents the results for the Company as a consolidated entity. For more information regarding the Merger and acquisitions and divestitures made by the Company during the years 2000-2004, please refer to the "Company Overview" and "Acquisitions and Divestitures" sections above, respectively.

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

2. The consolidated financial data includes the operating results of the following acquired and divested businesses:

• Ginsberg for the period from September 18, 2004 to December 31, 2004;
• CPR Prompt for the period from August 12, 2004 to December 31, 2004;
• Haan and NHI for 2004 and the period from June 1, 2003 to December 31, 2003;
• Simulaids for 2004, 2003 and the period from the date of the Merger to December 31, 2002;
• Safe Passage for the period from the date of the Merger to December 31, 2002;
• Spectrum for 2004, 2003, 2002 and the period from April 1, 2001 to December 31, 2001; and
• AMEP for 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and the period from March 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000.

3. Deferred income taxes for 2004 and 2003 are net of a tax benefit of $2.6 million and $1.3 million, respectively, due to reductions in the net deferred tax asset valuation allowance related primarily to increased estimates of projected Federal taxable income.
4. "EBITDA," which is considered a non-GAAP financial measure, is defined as earnings before interest and other income (including minority interest and extraordinary gain), income taxes, depreciation and amortization. A non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of a company's historical or future financial performance, financial position or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are normally included or excluded in a comparable measure calculated and presented under GAAP. EBITDA is not presented as an alternative measure of operating results (such as earnings from operations or net earnings) or cash flow from operations, as determined in accordance with GAAP, but is presented because the Company's management believes it is a widely accepted indicator of the Company's current financial performance and ability to incur and service debt. EBITDA does not give effect to cash used for debt service requirements and thus does not reflect funds available for dividends, reinvestment or other discretionary uses. In addition, EBITDA as presented herein may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. The following table provides a reconciliation of net earnings to EBITDA for the years ended December 31 (in millions):

12

This discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations reviews and compares the results of operations of the Company (after giving effect to the Merger), on a consolidated basis, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. This discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations has been derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

The Company is a leading manufacturer and global distributor of educational, health, medical technology and agricultural products, primarily offered through catalogs.

The following is a summary of key events for 2004:

Over the previous five years, the Company has experienced compound annual growth rates on net sales, gross profit and earnings before minority interest and extraordinary gain of 5.1%, 7.0% and 21.6%, respectively, primarily due to acquisitions, the Merger and improved purchasing efforts and cost controls.

A key strength of the Company's business is its ability to generate cash consistently. The Board of Directors and management use cash generated as a measure of the Company's performance. The Company uses the cash generated from operations to strengthen the balance sheet, including reducing liabilities such as pensions and debt, paying dividends on its preferred stock and completing prudent acquisition opportunities. The Company's management believes that examining the ability to generate cash provides investors with additional insight into the Company's performance.

13

The following table sets forth selected financial data (i) as a percentage of net sales for the fiscal years ended December 31 and (ii) the percentage change in dollars in those reported items from the prior fiscal year:

The Company is subject to seasonal influences with peak levels occurring in the second and third quarters of the fiscal year primarily due to increased educational shipments coinciding with the Fall start of new school years. As a result, the Company recognizes approximately 75% of its annual net earnings in the second and third quarters of its fiscal year. Inventory levels increase in March through June in anticipation of the peak shipping season. The majority of shipments are made between June and August and the majority of cash receipts are collected from August through October.

Quarterly results may also be materially affected by the timing of acquisitions, the timing and magnitude of costs related to such acquisitions, variations in costs of products sold, the mix of products sold and general economic conditions. Results for any quarter are not indicative of the results for any subsequent fiscal quarter or for a full fiscal year.

See Note 17 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for certain unaudited consolidated quarterly financial data for 2004 and 2003.

Net sales increased 7.3% to $175.1 million from $163.2 million in 2003. The growth in net sales for 2004 is primarily attributable to organic growth of approximately 5.0%, the inclusion of an additional $3.7 million of net sales from the Haan, CPR Prompt and Ginsberg acquisitions, and the overall stabilization of general national and international economic conditions in 2004 compared to the volatility in the U.S. economy and budget uncertainty in the U.S. education sector which had affected the Company in 2003. Net sales in the educational segment, totaling $149.5 million, increased 7.8% in 2004 from $138.7 million in 2003. Excluding the net sales from Haan, CPR Prompt and Ginsberg, educational net sales increased 5.2% from 2003. The commercial segment recorded net sales of $31.3 million in 2004, increasing 4.8% as compared to 2003.

14

Gross profit for 2004 increased 6.8% to $65.5 million from $61.3 million in 2003. The increase in gross profit for 2004 is primarily attributable to the 7.3% increase in net sales and the additional contribution to gross profit of $1.7 million made by Haan, CPR Prompt and Ginsberg. The gross profit margin of 37.4% remained consistent with the gross profit margin in 2003. The educational segment yielded a gross profit margin of 38.7% for both 2004 and 2003. The commercial gross profit margin in 2004 increased to 37.0% from 36.4% in 2003.

Selling and administrative expenses for 2004 increased 4.3% to $41.2 million from $39.5 million in 2003 while net sales increased 7.3%. As a percent of net sales, selling and administrative expenses decreased to 23.6% in 2004 from 24.2% in 2003. Expenses comprising this total include advertising and catalog costs, warehouse and shipping activities, customer service and general administrative functions. Selling and administrative expenses for 2004 were impacted by the following: (i) inclusion of an additional $.4 million in expenses of Haan, CPR Prompt and Ginsberg in operations for 2004; (ii) increase in salaries and wages of $2.2 million as a result of annual employee compensation increases and employee performance incentives; and (iii) an increase in group health costs by 2.3% to $3.2 million.

In 2004 and 2003, the Company recorded $.5 million in compensation expense related to grants of stock options to certain employees and directors.

During 2004 and 2003, the Company incurred and paid expenses of $.8 million to Geneve for certain administrative services.

Interest expense decreased 23.6% to $1.2 million in 2004, compared to $1.5 million in 2003. The decrease in interest expense is due to the decline in the weighted average interest rate on the Company's debt to 3.5% in 2004 compared to 3.6% in 2003 and a decrease in the weighted average debt outstanding during 2004 compared to 2003 as a result of the following: (i) decrease in the amounts outstanding on the Company's primary credit facility; (ii) payment of $1.1 million during the first quarter of 2004 for the full settlement of capital lease obligations related to the Haan Building Facility; (iii) payment in full of the $.5 million note payable to a related party during the second quarter of 2004; and (iv) payment of $3.4 million during the third quarter of 2004 in full settlement of the mortgage related to the properties held by NHI.

The Company's credit agreements assessed interest at a weighted average rate of 4.1% and 3.6% at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Aristotle and its qualifying domestic subsidiaries are included in the Federal income tax return and certain state income tax returns of Geneve. The provision for income taxes for the Company is determined on a separate return basis in accordance with the terms of a tax sharing agreement with Geneve, and payments for current Federal and certain state income taxes are made to Geneve.

15

The income tax provision for 2004 was $5.6 million compared to $8.3 million in 2003. These tax provisions reflect effective tax rates of 24.0% and 40.9% for 2004 and 2003, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate from 2003 to 2004 is primarily due to an additional $1.3 million decrease in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets and revisions made by management to other net deferred tax assets in 2004 as compared to 2003. The difference between the Federal statutory income tax rate of 35% and the effective income tax rate of 24.0% for 2004 results principally from a reduction in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets amounting to $2.6 million primarily related to increased estimates of projected taxable income, increases to other net deferred tax assets amounting to $.8 million and foreign and state income taxes. Approximately $7.4 million of the income tax provision for 2004 relates to the current utilization of the Company's Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards compared to approximately $8.1 million in 2003. The decrease in the utilization of Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards in 2004 compared to 2003 is primarily due to revisions made in 2003 for the utilization of Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards in prior years. Although the reported earnings for 2004 and 2003 are shown after-tax, approximately $7.4 million and $8.1 million, respectively, of cash from operations was retained in the Company as a result of the current utilization of these Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards. Except for Federal alternative minimum tax obligations arising from limitations on the utilization of Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards in 2004 and future years, the Company anticipates that the utilization of the available Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards to offset future Federal taxable income will result in the Company not having to use its cash resources to pay Federal income taxes for approximately the next two years.

At December 31, 2004, the Consolidated Balance Sheet contains a net deferred tax asset of $20.4 million, net of a valuation allowance of $7.7 million. Substantially all of the net deferred tax asset relates to Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards, which were recognized in applying purchase accounting to the Merger. The valuation allowance has been established primarily to reflect the estimate of Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards that are expected to expire unutilized. The valuation allowance decreased $3.3 million in 2004 as compared to $1.3 million in 2003. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes ("SFAS 109"), $.7 million of this decrease in the valuation allowance in 2004 was recognized as a reduction to goodwill in connection with the CPR Prompt and Ginsberg acquisitions as a result of the increased projected Federal taxable income provided by these acquisitions. The remaining $2.6 millio n or $.15 per basic and diluted common share decrease in the valuation allowance in 2004 was primarily related to the following: (i) $2.8 million decrease in the valuation allowance due to other increased estimates of projected Federal taxable income; and (ii) $.2 million increase in the valuation allowance related to the ability to realize certain other deferred tax assets. For 2003, the $1.3 million or $.08 per basic and diluted common share decrease in the valuation allowance related primarily to increased estimates of projected Federal taxable income. These adjustments to the valuation allowance were made as the Company now believes it is more likely than not that certain of these Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards will be utilized.

In 2003, net sales decreased 1.6% to $163.2 million from $165.9 million in 2002. The decline in net sales reflects the influence of state budget deficits incurred in fiscal years 2002 and 2003. Net sales for 2003 are positively impacted by the inclusion of net sales from Simulaids and Haan. Simulaids and Haan contributed an aggregate of $11.6 million in net sales in 2003, compared to $4.7 million in 2002. Excluding the net sales from Simulaids and Haan, net sales decreased 5.7% from 2002. Net sales in the educational segment, totaling $138.7 million, increased less than 1.0% in 2003 from $138.1 million in 2002. Excluding the net sales from Simulaids and Haan, educational net sales decreased 6.1% from 2002. The commercial segment recorded net sales of $29.9 million in 2003 versus $30.4 million for 2002. The lack of growth in the commercial segment is primarily due to the downward trend in sales of agricultural products and the overall instability of general n ational and international economic conditions.

16

Gross profit for 2003 increased 4.1% to $61.3 million from $58.9 million in 2002 despite the 1.6% decrease in net sales. In 2003, the gross profit margin increased to 37.6% from 35.5% in 2002. The increase in the gross profit margin is primarily due to: (i) the continued focus on improvements in purchasing efforts to reduce merchandise costs; (ii) the inclusion of Simulaids in operations for the entire twelve months of 2003 compared to six and one-half months in 2002, which made an incremental contribution to gross margin of $3.1 million; (iii) the inclusion of Haan in operations for the seven months ended December 31, 2003 compared to none in 2002, which made an incremental contribution to gross margin of $1.2 million; and (iv) a non-recurring, non-cash purchase accounting adjustment of $.9 million recorded in the third quarter of 2002. In connection with the Merger and in accordance with the purchase method of accounting under GAAP, certain inventories were val ued at fair value on the Merger date, which was $.9 million greater than their historical cost. This purchase accounting adjustment was expensed in cost of sales in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings during the third quarter of 2002 as the associated inventories were sold. Excluding the gross profit realized from Simulaids and Haan and 2002 expenses related to purchase accounting, the gross profit margin would be 36.3% in 2003, compared to the gross profit margin of 35.4% in 2002. The educational segment yielded a gross profit margin of 38.7% in 2003, improving on the 2002 gross profit margin of 38.4%. Excluding the incremental Simulaids and Haan gross profit and 2002 expenses related to purchase accounting, the educational gross profit margin was 37.8% in 2003 compared to 38.6% in 2002. The commercial gross profit margin of 36.4% for 2003 remained consistent with 2002.

Selling and administrative expenses for 2003 decreased 2.7% to $39.5 million from $40.6 million in 2002. As a percent of net sales, selling and administrative expenses decreased slightly to 24.2% in 2003 from 24.5% in 2002. Expenses comprising this total include advertising and catalog costs, warehouse and shipping activities, customer service and general administrative functions. Selling and administrative expenses for 2003 were positively impacted by the following: (i) implementation of cost control measures and labor efficiencies; (ii) reduction in advertising and catalog costs, excluding the impact of Simulaids and Haan, of $.7 million from 2002; (iii) elimination of $.7 million in expenses of Safe Passage as a result of the sale of the business in 2002; and (iv) $.4 million in expenses in 2002 related to severance payments due in connection with management changes. The decrease in advertising and catalog costs is attributed to technological efficiencies in catalog production through prior year capital expenditures in state of the art graphic design equipment programs.

Selling and administrative expenses for 2003 were negatively impacted by the following: (i) inclusion of $1.4 million in expenses of Simulaids in operations for 2003 as compared to $1.1 million in 2002 (from the Merger date to December 31, 2002); (ii) inclusion of $.4 million in expenses of Haan in operations for 2003 (the period from June 1, 2003 to December 31, 2003) as compared to none for 2002; (iii) a significant increase in group health care costs to $3.1 million in 2003; and (iv) an increase of $.2 million in non-cash stock compensation expense related to grants of stock options to certain employees and directors.

During 2003, the Company incurred and paid expenses of $.8 million to Geneve for certain administrative services. Prior to the Merger, the Company paid a management fee to Holdings. Under the terms of the management agreement, Holdings provided to the Company specified legal, tax and other corporate services. In 2002, through the Merger date, the management fee paid to Holdings was $.9 million.

Interest expense decreased 15.7% to $1.5 million in 2003, compared to $1.8 million in 2002. The decrease in interest expense is due to the decline in the weighted average interest rate on the Company's debt to 3.6% in 2003 compared to 4.1% in 2002 and reductions in borrowings under the Company's primary credit facility, net of the following events: (i) mortgage of $1.8 million entered into by the Company on March 12, 2003, related to the purchase of an office and warehouse facility for the Company's Spectrum operations; (ii) mortgage and note payable of $3.6 million and $.5 million, respectively, acquired by the Company on May 31, 2003, related to the acquisition of NHI; and (iii) note payable, seller financing and capital lease of $2.5 million, $1.8 million and $1.2 million, respectively, entered into by the Company on May 31, 2003, related to the acquisition and operations of Haan. The note payable and seller financing were paid in full during the fourth quarte r of 2003. The capital lease was extinguished in the first quarter of 2004.

The Company's credit agreements assessed interest at a weighted average rate of 3.6% and 3.3% at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

17

Aristotle and its qualifying domestic subsidiaries are included in the Federal income tax return and certain state income tax returns of Geneve. The provision for income taxes for the Company is determined on a separate return basis in accordance with the terms of a tax sharing agreement with Geneve, and payments for current Federal and certain state income taxes are made to Geneve.

The income tax provision for 2003 was $8.3 million compared to a provision amounting to $6.6 million in 2002. These tax provisions reflect effective tax rates of 40.9% and 39.6% for 2003 and 2002, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate from 2002 to 2003 is primarily due to revisions made by management to other net deferred tax assets, net of the $1.3 million decrease in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. The difference between the Federal statutory income tax rate of 35% and the effective income tax rate of 40.9% for 2003 results principally from a reduction in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets amounting to $1.3 million primarily related to increased estimates of projected taxable income, decreases to other net deferred tax assets and foreign and state income taxes. Approximately $8.1 million of the income tax provision for 2003 relates to the current utilization of the Company's Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards compared to approximately $3.5 million in 2002. Although the reported earnings for 2003 and 2002 are shown after-tax, approximately $8.1 million and $3.5 million, respectively, of cash from operations was retained in the Company as a result of the current utilization of these Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards. Except for Federal alternative minimum tax obligations arising from limitations on the utilization of Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards in 2003 and future years, the Company anticipates that the utilization of the available Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards to offset future Federal taxable income will result in the Company not having to use its cash resources to pay Federal income taxes for approximately the next three years.

At December 31, 2003, the Consolidated Balance Sheet contains a net deferred tax asset of $23.3 million, net of a valuation allowance of $11.0 million. Substantially all of the net deferred tax asset relates to Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards, which were recognized in applying purchase accounting to the Merger. The valuation allowance has been established to reflect the estimate of Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards that are expected to expire unutilized. During 2003, the valuation allowance decreased $1.3 million or $.08 per basic and diluted common share. This adjustment to the valuation allowance was made as the Company now believes it is more likely than not that certain of these Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards will be utilized.

At December 31, 2004, the Company had working capital of $53.4 million, increasing from $46.8 million at December 31, 2003. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $3.4 million in 2004, ending the year at $2.1 million. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $5.7 million in 2003, ending the year at $5.6 million. This decrease in the use of cash and cash equivalents during 2004 as compared to 2003 is primarily due to the following activities:

18

On October 15, 2003, the Company entered into a five-year, non-amortizing, $45.0 million Revolving Credit Facility. The proceeds from the Revolving Credit Facility were initially used to extinguish the $31.2 million in borrowings outstanding under the then-existing credit facility and $2.2 million in notes payable of the Company. The Revolving Credit Facility provides the Company with seasonal working capital, letters of credit and funds for appropriate acquisitions of businesses similar in nature to the Company's current business segments. This debt carries a variable rate of interest that is based on Prime or LIBOR rates plus applicable margins. At December 31, 2004, the weighted average interest rate on this debt was 3.8%. The Revolving Credit Facility currently has a committed weighted average rate of interest (including applicable margins) of less than 4%. Such rate commitments expire on various dates through March 30, 2005. The Company's Revolving Credit F acility is collateralized by certain accounts receivable, inventories and property, plant and equipment, and shares of a certain subsidiary's capital stock outstanding and ownership interests of certain of the Company's limited liability subsidiaries. The Revolving Credit Facility contains various financial and operating covenants, including, among other things, requirements to maintain certain financial ratios and restrictions on additional indebtedness, common stock dividend payments, capital disposals and intercompany management fees. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants as of December 31, 2004.

Minimum contractual obligations at December 31, 2004 are as follows (in thousands):

In 2005, capital expenditures to replace and upgrade existing equipment and install new equipment and fixtures to provide additional operating efficiencies are expected to approximate $1.7 million.

In 2005, the Company intends to purchase land in Saugerties, New York for approximately $.6 million for the construction of an approximately 83,000 square foot office and warehouse facility to be utilized it its Simulaids operations. It is estimated that the construction cost of the facility will be approximately $4.9 million. The Company anticipates completing construction by the fourth quarter of 2005. The Company intends to fund these capital expenditures through cash and debt secured by a mortgage on the land and facility. The Company intends to sell the current Simulaids facility following commencement of operations at the new facility.

Capital resources in the future are expected to be used for the development of catalogs and product lines, to acquire additional businesses and for other investing activities. The Company anticipates that there will be sufficient financial resources to meet projected working capital and other cash requirements for at least the next twelve months. Management of the Company believes it has sufficient capacity to maintain current operations and support a sustained level of future growth.

19

Inflation has had and is expected to have only a minor effect on the Company's operating results and its sources of liquidity.

The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to GAAP. The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto. Actual results could differ from those estimates. A summary of all of the Company's significant accounting policies can be found in Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The Company believes the following accounting policies affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements:

Prepaid Catalog Costs and Amortization - The Company accumulates all direct costs, less vendor rebates, incurred in the development, production and circulation of catalogs on the Consolidated Balance Sheets until the related catalog is mailed, at which time such catalog costs are amortized into selling and administrative expense over the estimated sales realization cycle of one year, using the straight-line method.

Deferred Income Taxes - At December 31, 2004, the Consolidated Balance Sheet contains a net deferred tax asset of approximately $20.4 million, net of a valuation allowance of approximately $7.7 million, related primarily to Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards. The realizability of this asset is dependent upon the Company's generation of sufficient levels of future taxable income and the ability to retain its Federal net operating tax loss carryforward position. As of December 31, 2004, the Company had Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards of approximately $69.7 million. Based upon projected future operating results, Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards of $48.2 million are expected to be utilized to offset future Federal taxable income primarily through 2006. The remaining $21.5 million of Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards are expected to expire unused. However, events may limit the use of all or a portion of these Federal net operating tax lo ss carryforwards, thus potentially resulting in a higher tax liability for the Company in the future. The net deferred tax asset, including the valuation allowance, at December 31, 2004 is subject to future adjustment based upon changes in management's evaluation of the realizability of the deferred tax asset.

Goodwill - The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that the assets may be impaired, by applying a fair value based test and, if impairment occurs, the amount of impaired goodwill is written off immediately. The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment based on the expected future cash flows or earnings projections. Goodwill is deemed impaired if the estimated discounted cash flows or earnings projections do not substantiate the carrying value. The estimation of such amounts requires significant management judgment with respect to revenue and expense growth rates, changes in working capital and selection of an appropriate discount rate, as applicable. The use of different assumptions would increase or decrease discounted future operating cash flows or earnings projections and could, therefore, change impairment determination. The Company has evaluated its goodwill at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and dete rmined that there has been no impairment of goodwill.

Defined Benefit Plans - The Company accounts for the benefits under its defined benefit pension plan using actuarial models required by SFAS No. 87, Employers' Accounting for Pension ("SFAS 87"). These models use an attribution approach that generally spreads individual events over the service lives of the employees in the plan. Examples of "events" are plan amendments and changes in actuarial assumptions such as discount rate, expected return on plan assets and rate of compensation increases. The principle underlying the required attribution approach is that employees render service over their service lives on a relatively consistent basis and, therefore, the statement of earnings effects of pension benefits are earned in, and should be expensed in, the same pattern.

In calculating the net periodic benefit cost and the related benefit obligation, the Company is required to select certain actuarial assumptions. These assumptions include discount rate, expected return on plan assets and rate of compensation increase. The discount rate assumptions reflect the prevailing market rates for long-term, high-quality, fixed-income debt instruments that, if the obligation was settled at the measurement date, would provide the necessary future cash flows to pay the benefit obligation when due. The Company uses long-term historical actual return experience with consideration of the expected investment mix of the plan's assets, as well as future estimates of long-term investment returns, to develop its assumptions of the expected return on plan assets. The rate of compensation increase is based on historical experience and the Company's long-term plans for such increases.

20

In each of 2004 and 2003, a 25 basis point decline in the discount rate assumptions caused a decrease in the funded status of the Company's pension plan. Consequently, the Company's accumulated benefit obligation exceeded the fair market value of the plan assets at December 31, 2004 and 2003. As required by SFAS 87, the Company recorded a non-cash, after-tax, net charge of $.4 million and $1.5 million to the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Earnings in the fourth quarters of 2004 and 2003, respectively. This charge did not impact the Company's pension expense, earnings or cash contribution requirements in 2004 or 2003.

See Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a more complete discussion of the Company's defined benefit pension plan.

Revenues - Customarily applying FOB-shipping point terms, the Company recognizes revenue upon shipment of products to its customers, which corresponds to the time when risk of ownership transfers. The point of shipment is typically from one of the Company's distribution centers or, on occasion, a vendor's location as a drop shipment. All drop shipment sales are recorded at gross selling price.

In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") announced that it had extended the compliance dates for non-accelerated filers and foreign private issuers to include in their annual reports a report by management on a company's internal control over financial reporting and an accompanying auditor's report (the "SEC Release"). The internal control reports are required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Sarbanes-Oxley Act"). The Company is a non-accelerated filer as defined under relevant SEC regulations. As a result of the SEC Release, the Company will not be required to include internal control reports in its annual report until its 2006 annual report, which will be filed by the Company in 2007.

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued a revised SFAS No. 123, Share-Based Payment ("SFAS 123R"), which establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services and incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services. SFAS 123R requires a company to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments, such as stock options, based on the grant-date fair value of the award and to recognize these awards as an expense in the statement of earnings over the requisite service period. The grant-date fair value of employee stock options and similar instruments will be estimated using option-pricing models adjusted for unique characteristics of those instruments unless observable market prices for the same or similar instruments are available. SFAS 123R replaces SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, which was issue d in October 1995. SFAS 123R is effective for all awards granted, modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after June 15, 2005. SFAS 123R provides for methods of applying this statement to existing awards during the transitional period. The adoption of SFAS 123R is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs: an amendment of ARB No. 43 ("SFAS 151"), which clarifies that abnormal costs of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted material should be recognized as current period expenses. SFAS 151 also requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS 151 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

21

In December 2003, the FASB issued a revised Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities ("Interpretation 46R"), which addresses how a business enterprise should evaluate whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity through means other than voting rights and accordingly should consolidate the entity. Interpretation 46R replaces Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which was issued in January 2003. The Company is required to apply Interpretation 46R to interests in variable interest entities ("VIE") created after December 31, 2003. For variable interests in VIEs created before January 1, 2004, the interpretation will be applied beginning on January 1, 2005. For any VIEs that must be consolidated under Interpretation 46R that were created before January 1, 2004, the assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests of the VIE initially would be measured at their carrying amounts with any difference between the net amount added to the balance sheet and any previously recognized interest being recognized as the cumulative effect of an accounting change. If determining the carrying amounts is not practicable, fair value at the date Interpretation 46R first applies may be used to measure the assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interest of the VIE. The adoption of Interpretation 46R did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements for 2004 and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements for 2005.

The Company believes that this Annual Report on Form 10-K may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the "safe-harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward looking statements include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, expectations, predictions, and assumptions and other statements which are other than statements of historical facts. These forward-looking statements are based on management's current expectations and are subject, and are qualified by, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or business conditions to differ materially from those projected or suggested in such forward-looking statements.

The Company cautions investors that there can be no assurance that actual results or business conditions will not differ materially from those projected or suggested in such forward-looking statements as a result of various factors including, but not limited to, the risk factors set forth below. As a result, the Company's future development efforts involve a high degree of risk. For further information, please see the Company's filings with the SEC, including its Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K.

The Company operates in highly competitive and fragmented markets. Businesses that compete with the Company are likely to continue expansion of their product offerings that may erode the Company's gross margins. The broad range of product lines offered by the Company is unique to the market as few competitors offer the depth of subject matter in their product mix. However, each of the Company's catalogs competes against a unique list of businesses that specialize in limited numbers of curriculum subjects or markets. Some competitors may be able to commit greater resources to product development, invest greater amounts on capital equipment and marketing plans, or offer more aggressive discounts for its products or services. In fragmented markets, competitors may further merge and consolidate, increasing market competition. Any of these competitive pressures could have a negative effect on the Company's operating results.

The Company's success depends on its ability to enhance existing products and services, develop new products, services and technologies that address the increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of customers and its ability to respond to technological advances and emerging industry standards and practices on a cost-effective and timely basis. If the Company is unable, for technical, legal, financial or other reasons, to adapt in a timely manner in response to changing market conditions or customer requirements, the Company's business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected.

22

The Company's ability to grow the business depends in part on the levels of student enrollment in elementary and secondary schools and expenditures per student. The level of student enrollment in elementary and secondary schools is largely a function of demographics. Expenditures per student are a function of prevailing political and social attitudes toward education, as well as government budgets. Any significant and sustained decline in the size of the levels of student enrollment and/or expenditures per student could have an adverse effect on the Company's business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

The performance of the Company is substantially dependent on the services and performance of its senior management and other key personnel. The loss of the services of, and the failure to promptly replace, any of the Company's executive officers or other key personnel, as well as the Company's inability to attract and retain qualified personnel, could have a negative effect on the business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Competition for qualified personnel is intense, and there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully attract, integrate or retain sufficiently qualified personnel.

The Company's results of operations have fluctuated in the past, and the Company's results of operations may vary from quarter to quarter in the future. If quarterly results fall below market expectations, the price of the Company's Common Stock and/or Series I Preferred Stock could fall. A number of factors, many of which are outside of the Company's control, may cause variations in its results of operations including:

A substantial portion of the Company's operating expenses are and will be related to sales and marketing, product development, technology and infrastructure, which expenses cannot be adjusted quickly and are therefore relatively fixed in the short term. The Company's operating expense levels are based in significant part on its expectations of future sales on a quarterly basis. As a result, if sales for a particular quarter are below expectations, the Company may not be able to reduce operating expenses proportionately for that quarter; this sales shortfall would have a negative effect on the Company's operating results and cash flow for that quarter, which would likely have a negative impact on the price of the Company's Common Stock and/or Series I Preferred Stock.

Market prices for securities of companies comparable to the Company are highly volatile. The market for the Company's Common Stock and Series I Preferred Stock has from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the Company's operating performance.

Although the Company's Common Stock and Series I Preferred Stock are publicly traded on the Nasdaq SmallCap Stock Market, the relative size of the Company and the small percentage of its outstanding Common Stock and Series I Preferred Stock that is publicly traded could prevent an active market for the Company's Common Stock and Series I Preferred Stock. If there is not an active market for the Common Stock and Series I Preferred Stock, it may be difficult to sell shares of Common Stock and Series I Preferred Stock, which could lower the price of the shares.

23

Stockholders of the Company other than Geneve currently own less than 10% of the outstanding voting power of the Company. Accordingly, stockholders of the Company other than Geneve have no ability to determine the outcome of any corporate actions requiring stockholder approval (other than certain amendments to the Company's amended and restated certificate of incorporation which may provide for a class vote), including the election of directors, the merger of the Company with or into Geneve or another company, a sale of substantially all of the Company's assets and/or the issuance of additional shares of the Company's capital stock.

Each share of Series I Preferred Stock accrues cumulative dividends at the rate of 11% per share, based on the $6.00 stated value of the Series I Preferred Stock, and it is the current intent of the Company's board of directors to declare such dividends. However, the payment of this dividend will be subject to the discretion of the board of directors of the Company, which has no obligation to declare or pay the dividend. While no dividends may be paid with respect to the Company's Common Stock or Series J Preferred Stock until dividends are paid with respect to the Series I Preferred Stock, there can be no assurance that any cash dividend payments will be made to holders of Series I Preferred Stock.

Although each share of Series I Preferred Stock and any accrued but unpaid dividends may be converted into shares of the Company's Common Stock, the market price of the Company's Common Stock when the Series I Preferred Stock becomes convertible may not be sufficient for such conversion to adequately compensate for the Company's failure to pay accrued dividends on its Series I Preferred Stock. Moreover, there can be no assurance that the market for the Company's Common Stock at the time of conversion will have sufficient trading volume so as to provide liquidity for holders of Series I Preferred Stock.

The Company believes that its Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards will be available to offset future taxable income through 2006, and that the Company's stockholders will continue to benefit from the Company's Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards. The realizability of the Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards is dependent upon the Company's generation of sufficient levels of future taxable income and the ability to retain its Federal net operating tax loss carryforward position. However, events may limit the use of all or a portion of these Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards, thus potentially resulting in a higher tax liability for the Company in the future.

From time to time the Company accesses the capital markets to obtain financing. Although the Company believes that it can continue to access the capital markets in the future on acceptable terms and conditions, the Company's flexibility could be limited by the Company's operating results and financial position, including such factors as current levels of outstanding debt and working capital. In addition, many of the factors that affect our ability to access the capital markets, such as the current state of the economy, are outside of the Company's control. There can be no assurances that we will continue to have access to the capital markets on terms acceptable to the Company.

The Company views its existing $45.0 million Revolving Credit Facility as a source of available liquidity. This facility contains various covenants with which the Company must be in compliance in order to borrow funds. If the Company wishes to borrow under this facility in the future, there can be no assurance that the Company will be in compliance with these covenants. By its terms, the Revolving Credit Facility expires in October 2008. The Company anticipates renewing the facility on terms at least as favorable as the existing facility, but there can be no assurances of renewal or the terms on which the Company renews.

24

The Company reviews many acquisition candidates and, in addition to acquisitions which the Company has already made, the Company is continually evaluating new acquisition opportunities. Factors which may affect our ability to grow successfully through acquisitions include:

Complying with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may require the Company to expend significant resources, which could increase selling and administrative expenses and divert management time and attention from sales-generating activities.

The Company's financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and debt. As described below, credit risk and interest rate risk are the primary sources of market risk in the Company's accounts receivable and debt.

Credit Risk: The Company provides credit in the normal course of business to its customers, which are primarily educational institutions or distributors. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of sales in 2004, 2003 or 2002. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers, maintains allowances for potential credit losses and generally does not require collateral to support its accounts receivable balances.

Interest Rate Risk: Changes in interest rates can potentially impact the Company's profitability and its ability to realize assets and satisfy liabilities. Interest rate risk is resident primarily in debt, which typically has variable interest rates based on Prime or LIBOR rates. Assuming no other change in financial structure, an increase of 1% in the Company's variable interest rate for debt would decrease pre-tax earnings for 2005 by approximately $.3 million. This amount is determined by considering the impact of a 1% increase in interest on the average debt estimated to be outstanding in 2005.

25

The Company's debt as of December 31, 2004 is as follows (in millions, except percentage data):

The fair market value of debt equals the face amount of debt outstanding because the underlying rate of interest on substantially all of the Company's debt is variable based upon Prime or LIBOR rates.

The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company, together with the related Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and report of the independent registered public accounting firm are set forth below.

26

The Board of Directors
The Aristotle Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Aristotle Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity and comprehensive earnings, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Aristotle Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Milwaukee, Wisconsin

February 25, 2005

27

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

28

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

29