Back to GetFilings.com













































FORM 10-K

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000

or

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from N/A to N/A

Commission File Number: 0-15448



CENTENNIAL MORTGAGE INCOME FUND II
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



California 33-0112106
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

1540 South Lewis Street, Anaheim, California 92805
(Address of principal executive office) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (714)502-8484

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Limited Partnership Units
(Title of Class)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES X NO

Indicate by check mark whether if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part
III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

YES X NO



PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

(a) General Development of the Business

Centennial Mortgage Income Fund II (the "Partnership"), a California Limited
Partnership, was organized on July 12, 1985. The Partnership's registration
statement became effective January 17, 1986. The general partners are John B.
Joseph, Ronald R. White and Centennial Corporation ("CC").

Beginning in the fourth quarter of 1987, the Partnership ceased accepting
capital contributions and entered its operating stage of business. During the
fourth quarter of 1992, 60 months after the closing of its offering stage, the
Partnership ceased making new loans and entered the repayment stage. For
additional information, See Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

(b) Financial Information about Industry Segments

Given that the Partnership is in the process of liquidation, the Partnership
has identified only one operating business segment which is the business of
asset liquidation.

(c) Narrative Description of Business

The Partnership was formed to invest in mortgage investments consisting of
participating first mortgage loans, other equity participation loans,
construction loans, and wrap-around and other junior loans on commercial,
industrial and residential income-producing real property.

The Partnership's objectives are to preserve the Partnership's invested
capital, provide increased cash distributions to the limited partners as the
cash flow from the properties underlying mortgage investments increases over
the life of the Partnership, provide capital growth through participation in
the increased value of the underlying properties and provide liquidating
distributions as cash from the sale of real estate owned is no longer needed
for development and operations of real estate owned.

Due to the long term recession and falling real estate market values in
California during the early 1990's, many of the Partnership's loans became
delinquent and management of the Partnership elected to foreclose, thereby
increasing real estate owned balances. As a result, the Partnership became a
direct investor in this real estate. The Partnership has managed its
operating properties and completed certain development processes on its raw
land over the last several years in an effort to make this real estate more
marketable.

The improving real estate markets and development of the Partnership's assets
have enabled the Partnership to liquidate the majority of its assets. As of
December 31, 2000, the Partnership's assets consisted of $1,674,000 in cash
and cash equivalents and $399,000 in other non-cash assets. It is possible
that the remaining non-cash assets could be liquidated during 2001.

Real estate owned by the Partnership reached a peak at December 31, 1993 and
has been declining since that time. The following are the balances of real
estate owned before allowance for possible losses as of December 31 for the
past eight years:

1993 $ 24,170,000
1994 11,284,000
1995 11,314,000
1996 11,316,000
1997 10,827,000
1998 4,599,000
1999 2,843,000
2000 1,511,000

As of December 31, 2000, the Partnership had established a $1,112,000
allowance for possible losses on its real estate owned.

The liquidation of assets during 1998 enabled the Partnership to make a
$3,496,000 cash distribution to its limited partners in October 1998.

Additional asset liquidations during 1999 and 2000 enabled the Partnership to
make another $2,127,000 cash distribution to its limited partners in October
2000.

Risks of the year 2000 Issue

As discussed above, the Partnership is in the process of liquidating its
remaining assets. As of December 31, 1999, the Partnership held only cash and
cash equivalents, two notes receivable, a single parcel of unimproved real
estate and $7,000 in other non-cash assets. In light of these circumstances,
the Partnership made only the absolutely necessary modifications to existing
software which were necessitated by the year 2000 issues. The cost of these
modifications was less than $10,000.

To date, the Partnership has experienced only minor computer related problems
that are the result of the year 2000. None of these problems have caused any
significant disruption to the Partnership's operations. The Partnership does
not anticipate that it will encounter any future significant problems in the
coming months nor does it anticipate that it will be required to spend any
significant amounts to correct future year 2000 problems.

Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Information

The Partnership wishes to caution readers that the forward-looking statements
contained in this Form 10-K under "Item 1. Business," "Item 7. Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and
elsewhere in this Form 10-K involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties
which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the
Partnership to be materially different from any future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements made by or
on behalf of the Partnership. In connection with the "safe harbor" provisions
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Partnership is
filing the following cautionary statements identifying important factors that
in some cases have affected, and in the future could cause the Partnership's
actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any such forward-
looking statements.

The factors that could cause the Partnership's results to differ materially
include, but are not limited to, general economic and business conditions,
including interest rate fluctuations; the impact of competitive products and
pricing; success of operating initiatives; adverse publicity; changes in
business strategy or development plans; quality of management; availability,
terms and deployment of capital; the results of financing efforts; business
abilities and judgment of personnel; availability of qualified personnel;
employee benefit costs and changes in, or the failure to comply with
government regulations.

(d) Financial Information about Foreign and Domestic Operations and Export
Sales

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.

No properties or facilities are owned or leased by the Partnership other than
real estate owned which was obtained through foreclosure of real estate loans
receivable, as described in note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

None

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

No matters have been submitted to a vote of security holders.






































PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S PARTNERSHIP UNITS AND RELATED SECURITY
HOLDER MATTERS.

(a) Securities Market Information

There is no market for the Partnership's limited partnership units, nor is one
expected to develop. The Partnership units were offered by the Partnership
through selected dealers who were members of the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc.

(b) Approximate Number of Holders of Limited Partnership Units

As of December 31, 2000, there were approximately 2,799 holders of limited
partnership units.

(c) Partnership Distributions

The Partnership paid a $3,496,000 cash distribution to limited partners in
October 1998. This distribution equaled approximately $120.00 per limited
partnership unit.

The Partnership paid a $2,127,000 cash distribution to limited partners in
October 2000. This distribution equaled approximately $73.00 per limited
partnership unit.

Management intends to distribute cash flow available for distribution (as
defined in the Partnership Agreement), if any, on a periodic basis as
substantial cash balances are accumulated from property sales and/or loan
payoffs. Distributions may vary in amount and may be suspended based upon
advice from legal counsel until the possibility of any unforeseen legal action
against the Partnership becomes remote. See Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.


























ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA



Years ended
(dollars in thousands, except per unit data)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/31/00 12/31/99 12/31/98 12/31/97 12/31/96
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Total revenue $ 181 $ 277 $ 479 $ 170 $ 251
Net loss (71) (254) (754) (929) (1,515)
Net loss per limited
partnership unit-
basic and diluted (2.44) (8.72) (25.87) (31.88) (51.99)
Cash distributions
per limited
partnership unit 73.00 --- 120.00 -- --
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEET DATA:
Total loans before
allowance for losses --- 548 598 1,029 1,068
Total real estate
owned before allowance
for losses 1,511 2,843 4,599 10,827 11,316
Total assets 2,073 4,325 4,820 9,354 10,132
Partners' equity 2,062 4,260 4,514 8,764 9,693


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

General

Net loss and loss per limited partnership unit were $(71,000) and $(2.44) for
the year ended December 31, 2000, down from $(254,000) and $(8.72) for the
year ended December 31, 1999 and $(754,000) and $(25.87) in 1998. Major
changes between statements of operations components from 1999 to 2000
included: 1) an $82,000 increase in interest on interest bearing deposits; 2)
a $32,000 increase in provision for possible losses; 3) a $68,000 decrease in
net operating income from operations of real estate owned; 4) a $60,000
decrease in expenses associated with non-operating real estate owned; 5) a
$37,000 decrease in interest expense; and 6) a $105,000 decrease in general
and administrative costs. Major changes between statements of operations
components from 1998 to 1999 included: 1) a $460,000 decrease in provision for
possible losses; 2) a $127,000 decrease in expenses associated with non-
operating real estate owned; 3) a $197,000 decrease in gain (loss) on sale of
real estate owned; and 4) a $96,000 decrease in share of losses in
unconsolidated investee. A detailed discussion of the significant changes in
each component of revenue and expense for each of the years in the three year
period ended December 31, 2000 is included in the following paragraphs.


Liquidity and Capital Resources

At December 31, 2000, the Partnership had $1,674,000 in unrestricted cash and
cash equivalents. Additional sources of funds are expected to be from the
sale of real estate owned.

During 2000, the Partnership's principal sources of cash were: i) $1,332,000
of cash proceeds from the sale of real estate; ii) $516,000 in principal
payments received on loans in excess of disbursements on loans; and iii)
$169,000 in interest income on loans and interest bearing deposits. The
Partnership's principal uses of cash during 2000 were: i) a $2,127,000 cash
distribution to limited partners; ii) $186,000 in general and administrative
costs; iii) $27,000 in real estate taxes paid; and iv) $61,000 in other
expenses associated with non-operating real estate owned;

Subsequent to December 31, 2000, the Partnership entered into a purchase and
sale agreement involving the remaining 18 acres of its property in Sacramento.
Although the buyer failed to make certain required cash deposits into escrow
and the Partnership has cancelled the sales agreement, the prospective buyer
has continued to express an interest in consummating the purchase of the
property. The remaining acreage has several characteristics that limit its
usefulness to many prospective purchasers, including the configuration of its
lot lines and power line easements. The current prospective buyer is an "end
user" and their intended use of the property is not precluded by these
characteristics. While the cancelled agreement provided for an all cash sales
price of $1,180,000, management believes that it may be unable find another
buyer in the near future who would be willing to purchase the property for
this price. Given management's intention to liquidate the Partnership as soon
as practicable, it may elect to sell the remaining property to a developer
rather than an "end user" at a lower price than the transaction discussed
above if it is not consumated. Accordingly, the Partnership has not adjusted
the net carrying value of the property which was $399,000 after allowance for
possible losses as of December 31, 2000.

As of December 31, 2000, the Partnership had no unfunded loan commitments or
notes payable commitments. The Partnership's principal capital requirements
include: i) property taxes and bonds on real estate owned of approximately
$23,000 payable in 2001, and ii) selling, general and administrative costs.

Effective with the third quarter of 1991, the Partnership had suspended making
any cash distributions to partners, due to a decline in liquidity and the
uncertainty of the cash requirements for existing and potential real estate
owned. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, 60 months after the closing of
the offering, cash proceeds from mortgage investments are no longer available
for reinvestment by the Partnership.

Through the latter part of 1997, the general partners believed that the cash
proceeds from mortgage reductions and the sale of real estate owned should be
retained by the Partnership until such time as it was assured that it had
sufficient cash to fulfill any potential operating requirements. Due to the
substantial real estate owned balances, these potential operating costs were
considered to be very significant. As a result of the substantial decrease in
real estate owned which occurred in 1997 and 1998, the general partners
determined that the Partnership could make a $3,496,000 distribution to its
limited partners in October 1998.

Additional asset liquidations during 1999 and 2000 enabled the Partnership to
make another $2,127,000 cash distribution to its limited partners in October
2000.

The general partners have had discussions with legal counsel regarding the
amounts of cash balances that would be prudent to be retained by the
Partnership at this time. In light of the substantial amount of real estate
that the Partnership has held an interest in over the years, there is always
the potential for future litigation to arise, particularly in the area of
toxic contamination. The litigation which arose in 1999 (see discussion under
"Other Expenses"- "Expenses associated with non-operating real estate owned"
below) is an example of this. Although the general partners are not aware of
any other threatened litigation, or litigation that is likely to arise, they
have determined that the Partnership should retain at least $1,000,000 in cash
balances to be available to defend the Partnership in any future litigation
which may arise. It is expected that these cash balances will be retained
until such time as legal counsel advises the general partners that the
potential for any future litigation is remote.

The general partners anticipate making another distribution to limited
partners during the first half of 2001. The amount of this distribution will
most likely be approximately equal to the Partnership's cash balances in
excess of $1,000,000 unless unforeseen developments arise. The potential
sales transaction discussed above could have a significant impact on the
amount of this distribution.

Results of Operations

The Partnership's non-cash assets declined from $9,159,000 as of December 31,
1997 to $399,000 as of December 31, 2000. The substantial reduction in non-
cash assets between 1997 and 2000 caused many changes in the Partnership's
results of operations as discussed below.

Interest income on loans to affiliates, including fees was $16,000 for 1998.
There was no interest income on loans to affiliates for 2000 or 1999 because
the loans receivable from unconsolidated investees were placed on nonaccrual
status in late 1996. The income in 1998 is related to interest repayments on
loans to the Silverwood joint venture, which was constructing homes in
Lancaster, California. This interest, which was repaid in 1998, had not
previously been accrued by the Partnership.

Interest income on loans to nonaffiliates was $32,000, $45,000 and $12,000 in
2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. In October 1998, the Partnership received
two loans in connection with the payoff of certain loans to Silverwood Homes,
an unconsolidated investee discussed in more detail below. These new loans
have been the principal source of interest income on loans to nonaffiliates
since 1998. The increase in 1999 can be attributed to the fact that the loans
were outstanding for a greater part of the year while the decrease in 2000 is
attributable to the loans being repaid in October 2000.

The real estate owned balance before allowance for possible losses at December
31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 was $1,511,000, $2,843,000 and $4,599,000,
respectively. The balance at December 31, 2000 is comprised of a single
property located in Sacramento California and is offset by a $1,112,000
allowance for possible losses.

The following sections entitled "Nonaccrual Loans and Other Loans to
Affiliates" and "Real Estate Owned" provide a detailed analysis of these
assets.

Nonaccrual Loans and Other Loans to Affiliates

Loans on nonaccrual status during the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1999
are summarized below:

During 1994 the Partnership acquired a 50% interest in LCR Development, Inc.,
an unconsolidated subsidiary. The balance of LCR is owned by Centennial
Mortgage Income Fund ("CMIF "), an affiliate. LCR was formed in order to take
title to 179 residential lots in Lancaster, California through foreclosure of
a $1,250,000 secured loan held by CMIF and a $2,115,000 secured loan held
jointly by the Partnership and CMIF. The Partnership assigned its interest in
the $2,115,000 note to LCR in exchange for a new note payable by LCR to the
Partnership and CMIF. LCR subsequently: i) took title to the 179 lots
through foreclosure; ii) entered into a joint venture with Home Devco, Inc.
named Silverwood Homes ("Silverwood"); and iii) contributed the 179 lots to
Silverwood. The principal purpose of the joint venture was to construct homes
on the property.

From 1995 through 1998, the Partnership and CMIF made several construction and
development loans to Silverwood and Silverwood constructed 22 homes and sold
21 homes on the property . Originally, it was anticipated that homes would be
constructed on all 179 lots, that there would be excess cash from the home
sales after paying off the development and construction loans, and this excess
cash would be used to repay LCR for its investment in the joint venture. LCR
would then be able to use this anticipated excess cash from Silverwood's home
sales to repay the Partnership and CMIF for the $1,250,000 and $2,115,000
loans.

LCR reported substantial net losses, principally due to the continuing decline
in value of the lots, from 1995 through 1997. As of December 31, 1997, the
Partnership had reduced its share of the carrying value of the $2,115,000 loan
to $-0- and had reduced the carrying value of $1,191,000 in development and
construction loans by $377,000 to $814,000. These reductions were made by
applying the Partnership's share of losses from unconsolidated investee that
it had recorded, against the carrying value of the loans.

During 1998, Silverwood stopped constructing homes and all but one of the
remaining homes that had been constructed were sold. Additionally, all of the
undeveloped lots were sold. The Partnership funded additional advances of
$295,000 on the development and construction loans in 1998. The Partnership
also recorded an additional $96,000 in losses from unconsolidated investee
during 1998 and received cash payments totaling $410,000 against these loans.
Additionally, the Partnership received two notes receivable totaling $586,000
from an unaffiliated party as a partial repayment of the development loan in
connection with the sale of the remaining 157 lots in October 1998. These new
notes were secured by the 157 lots sold. These transactions left the
Partnership with a net carrying value of its loans to Silverwood of $17,000 as
of December 31, 1998.

During 1999, Silverwood sold its final home and made payments totaling $12,000
to the Partnership out of cash generated from this sale. During 2000,
Silverwood made an additional $3,000 payment and the Partnership charged off
the remaining $2,000 balance of its loans to Silverwood to provision for
losses.

Real Estate Owned

A description of the Partnership's principal real estate owned during the
years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999 follows:

Office Building in San Bernardino, California

The Partnership funded a loan during January 1988 with an original committed
amount of $921,000 which was secured by a second trust deed on an office
building comprised of 15,984 square feet of rentable space located in San
Bernardino, California. The loan was provided as gap financing behind a first
deed of trust in the amount of $350,000 to another financial institution. The
borrower was unable to payoff the loan at maturity and the Partnership
foreclosed on April 20, 1993. The project was 74 percent leased as of
December 31, 1997 and 83 percent leased as of December 31, 1998. Additional
leases signed increased the occupancy to as high as 92 percent, however, a
number of leases expired in 1999 and occupancy levels declined slightly as a
result. The property generated net operating income of $68,000 during 1999.
The Partnership sold this property in December 1999. The sale generated net
sales proceeds of $637,000. The sale resulted in a $5,000 loss after applying
$299,000 of the Partnership's previously recorded allowance for possible
losses on real estate investments.

44 Acres in Sacramento, California

The Partnership funded a loan in 1987 with a committed amount of $4,000,000
secured by a first trust deed on 43.78 acres in Sacramento, California. The
loan was provided for the development of offsite improvements. The maturity
date was February 1, 1991. The borrower was unable to obtain construction
financing and bring interest current. The Partnership accepted a grant deed
on the property on March 10, 1992. The property is zoned for multi-family and
light industrial use. A portion of the property is adjacent to Highway 99 and
has good freeway visibility.

The Partnership rezoned and subdivided a portion of the property to facilitate
one escrow on a 6.5 acre portion of the property without freeway visibility.
This transaction closed escrow during the fourth quarter of 1997.

There had been only limited industrial/commercial use development activity in
the area surrounding this property during 1996 and 1997. In light of this
limited activity and management's objective of liquidating the Partnership's
remaining assets as soon as practical, the Partnership recorded an additional
$504,000 provision for losses against the carrying value of this property
during 1998.

During the first quarter of 1999, the Partnership opened escrow on a 9.45 acre
portion of the property which also did not have freeway visibility. for a
purchase price of $900,000. The escrow closed at the end of the second
quarter of 1999, generated $842,000 in net cash proceeds and was recorded at
no gain or loss. Both the parcel sold in 1997 and the parcel sold in 1999 are
zoned for residential use. The balance of the property is zoned for
industrial/commercial use.

The Partnership sold another 7.13 acres parcel of the property in February
2000. The sale generated net sales proceeds of $846,000. The Partnership
recorded no gain or loss on this sale.

The Partnership sold another 2.65 acre parcel of the property in August 2000.
The sale generated net sales proceeds of $486,000. The Partnership recorded
no gain or loss on this sale.

As of December 31, 2000, the Partnership still held approximately 18 acres of
the 43.78 acre parcel in Sacramento. Subsequent to December 31, 2000, the
Partnership entered into a purchase and sale agreement involving this
remaining 18 acres. Although the buyer failed to make certain required cash
deposits into escrow and the Partnership has cancelled the sales agreement,
the prospective buyer has continued to express an interest in consummating the
purchase of the property. The remaining acreage has several characteristics
that limit its usefulness to many prospective purchasers, including the
configuration of its lot lines and power line easements. The current
prospective buyer is an "end user" and their intended use of the property is
not precluded by these characteristics. While the cancelled agreement provided
for an all cash sales price of $1,180,000, management believes that it may be
unable find another buyer in the near future who would be willing to purchase
the property for this price. Given management's intention to liquidate the
Partnership as soon as practicable, it may elect to sell the remaining
property to a developer rather than an "end user" at a lower price than the
transaction discussed above if it is not consummated. Accordingly, the
Partnership has not adjusted the net carrying value of the property which was
$399,000 after allowance for possible losses as of December 31, 2000.

Proposed Marina and Condominiums in Redwood City, California

On April 7, 1989, the Partnership foreclosed on a land loan located in Redwood
City, California with an original committed amount of $3,487,000. The purpose
of the loan was to acquire the land and provide for the planning of a 122-slip
marina plus an office building and restaurant. The original maturity date of
October 21, 1986 was extended to March 1, 1987. In March 1987, the borrower
filed bankruptcy. The property had been in escrow since 1996 for a purchase
price of $4,000,000. Due to some pending costs to resolve access issues, the
price was reduced to $3,900,000. It closed escrow June 12, 1998 and the
Partnership received net proceeds from the sale of $3,699,000. During the
first quarter of 1998, the Partnership reversed $55,000 of its previously
recorded provision for losses against this property. The Partnership recorded
a $71,000 gain on sale on this transaction.

10.66 Acres in Roseville, California

The Partnership funded a loan in 1990 with an original commitment of
$2,779,000 secured by a second deed of trust on 982 acres in Roseville,
California. The borrower failed to make the required yearly principal payment
to the first and second trust deed holders. The first trust deed holder filed
a notice of default for nonpayment. Management negotiated a settlement
agreement to accept a 10.66 acre commercial site as payment in full for the
$2,779,000 note. The property was sold in June 1998 for an all cash purchase
price of $1,200,000 with the Partnership receiving net proceeds of $1,124,000.
The Partnership recorded a $121,000 gain on sale on this transaction.

Interest on Interest-Bearing Deposits

Interest on interest-bearing deposits represents interest earned on
Partnership funds invested, for liquidity, in time certificate and money
market deposits. Interest on interest-bearing deposits was $137,000 in 2000,
$55,000 in 1999 and $78,000 in 1998. The increase in interest income from
1999 to 2000 was primarily due to higher average cash balances that resulted
from the property sales and loan payoffs received in the fourth quarter of
1999 and all of 2000. The decrease in interest income from 1998 to 1999 was
caused by lower average cash and cash equivalent balances. The lower average
balances during 1999 were the result of the $3.5 million cash distribution to
limited partners in October 1998.

Income from Operations of Real Estate Owned

Income from operations of real estate owned totaled $173,000 in 1999 and
$160,000 in 1998. The 1999 and 1998 revenues are from the office building in
San Bernardino. The increase from 1998 to 1999 was primarily due to increased
occupancy levels. The property was sold in December 1999.

Gain (loss) on Sale of Real Estate Owned

As discussed above, the Partnership recorded a loss of $5,000 on the sale of
the office building in San Bernardino in 1999. The Partnership also recorded
gains of $71,000 and $121,000 on the sales of the Redwood City and Roseville
properties, respectively, during 1998. There were no gains or losses recorded
on the sale of real estate during 2000.

Provision for Possible Losses

The provision for possible losses was $32,000 in 2000 and $460,000 in 1998.
There was no provision for possible losses recorded in 1999. The 2000
provision relates to the discounted payoff of the remaining loans held by the
Partnership. The 1998 provision is comprised of a $504,000 provision on the
45 acres in Sacramento, an $11,000 provision on the office building in San
Bernardino offset by a reversal of $55,000 on the proposed marina and
condominiums in Redwood City.

Management believes that the allowance for possible losses at December 31,
2000 is adequate to absorb the known risks in the Partnership's loan and real
estate owned portfolios.

Other Expenses

The Partnership has invested in corporations in which it has less than a
majority ownership and accounts for these investments using the equity method.
The Partnership's share of losses in unconsolidated investees was $96,000 for
1998. There was no comparable amount reported in 2000 or 1999. The 1998
share of losses consist primarily of operating losses from the sale of homes
and finished lots recorded by LCR. The Partnership's remaining investment in
and loans receivable from this unconsolidated investee has been reduced to
$-0- as of December 31, 2000.

Operating expenses from operations of real estate owned were $93,000 in 1999
and $92,000 in 1998. These expenses were associated with the office building
in San Bernardino that was sold in December 1999.

Operating expenses from operations of real estate owned paid to affiliates
were $12,000 each for 1999 and 1998. The expenses consist of property
management fees paid to affiliates of the general partners. These expenses
were associated with the office building in San Bernardino that was sold in
December 1999.

Expenses associated with non-operating real estate owned were $45,000 in 2000,
$105,000 in 1999 and $232,000 in 1998. The expenses relate principally to the
proposed marina and condominiums in Redwood City, the 44 acres in Sacramento
and the 10.66 acres in Roseville. These expenses include property taxes of
$27,000, $39,000 and $130,000 for 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The
decreases from 1998 to 1999 are principally attributable to the sale of the
proposed marina and condominiums in Redwood City and the 10.66 acres in
Roseville in June 1998. The 1999 expense also includes $43,000 in costs
accrued in anticipation of the settlement of litigation involving certain
time-share units previously owned by the Partnership which were charged off in
1992. There was no comparable litigation expense during 2000.

Depreciation and amortization expense was $4,000 in 1999 and $4,000 in 1998
for the office building in San Bernardino that was sold in December 1999. .

Interest expense was $37,000 for 1999 and $16,000 for 1998. This interest
expense relates to the debt secured by the office building in San Bernardino.
The increase in interest expense from 1998 to 1999 is a result of the
refinance of property in June 1998 with a new $235,000 note bearing interest
at 8.64 percent per annum.

General and administrative expenses, affiliates were $104,000, $192,000 and
$257,000 in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. These expenses are primarily
salary allocation reimbursements paid to affiliates for the management of the
Partnership's assets. The decreases in 2000 and 1999 are attributable to a
substantial layoff of the corporate partner's personnel in March 1999 in
response to the Partnership's decreasing assets.

General and administrative expenses, nonaffiliates was $71,000, $88,000 and
$64,000 in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The decrease in 2000 is
principally attributable to a decrease in accounting fees and investor
reporting costs. The increase in 1999 is principally attributable to an
increase in accounting fees and investor reporting costs .

In June 1998, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities"
("SFAS 133"). SFAS 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for
derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded
in other contracts, (collectively referred to as derivatives) and for
hedging activities. It requires that an entity recognize all derivatives
as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and
measure those instruments at fair value. If certain conditions are met, a
derivative may be specifically designated as (a) a hedge of the exposure to
changes in the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or an
unrecognized firm commitment, (b) a hedge of the exposure to variable cash
flows of a forecasted transaction or (c) a hedge of the foreign currency
exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation, an unrecognized firm
commitment, an available for sale security or a foreign-currency-denominated
forecasted transaction. Under SFAS 133, an entity that elects to apply
hedge accounting is required to establish at the inception of the hedge the
method it will use for assessing the effectiveness of the hedging derivative
and the measurement approach for determining the ineffective aspect of the
hedge. Those methods must be consistent with the entity's approach to
managing risk. The adoption of this pronouncement had no effect on the
Partnership's financial statements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Since the Partnership does not invest in any derivative financial instruments
or enter into any activities involving foreign currencies, its market risk
associated with financial instruments is limited to the effect that changing
domestic interest rates might have on the fair value of its bank deposits.

As of December 31, 2000, the Partnership held fixed rate bank deposits with
carrying values totaling $1,674,000. The bank deposits all had maturities of
less than ninety days. The fair value of these bank deposits was estimated to
be equal to their carrying values as of December 31, 2000 due to their near
term maturities.

Given the relatively short-term maturities of these assets, management does
not believe the Partnership is exposed to any significant market risk related
to their fair value.


ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules attached hereto.


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON REPORTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Identification of General Partners

The Partnership is managed by its general partners. The individual general
partners' principal occupations and affiliations during the last five years
are described in the following table. The general partners devote to the
affairs of the Partnership such portion of their time as they consider
necessary for the effective supervision of its affairs.

Name, Age and Position
Principal Occupation and
Affiliation during Last Five Years
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John B. Joseph
Age 62
General Partner

John B. Joseph is currently Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors and Vice
President of Centennial Corporation. He has held these positions since 1983.
Mr. Joseph also has served, in the following capacities during the past five
years: he was on the board of directors for West Coast Bancorp ("WCB"), a
publicly held bank holding company operating in California from its inception
in 1981 through February 1999; he was Chairman of the Board of Directors of
WCB since its inception in 1981 and CEO from April 1991 until 1998. Mr. Joseph
has also been general partner of various public and private limited
partnerships engaged in real estate development and lending activities.

Mr. Joseph has 30 years of experience in asset management in both securities
and real estate. Mr. Joseph has worked in all areas of real estate. In the
past, Mr. Joseph has been engaged in the syndication and management of over
$100 million worth of income property, including industrial complexes,
shopping centers, business centers, office buildings, commercial properties
and residential units.

Ronald R. White
Age 54
General Partner

Ronald R. White is currently President and CEO of Centennial Corporation. He
has held these positions since 1983. He was also Executive Vice President and
Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of WCB until 1998. Mr. White served
in these capacities since April 1987. Mr. White also serves, or has served,
in the following capacities during the past five years: general partner of
various public and private limited partnerships engaged in real estate
development and lending activities.

Mr. White's career spans the financial and management fields in both
securities and real estate. Mr. White has 28 years of experience in asset
management. In the past, Mr. White has been engaged in the syndication and
management of over $100 million worth of income property including industrial
complexes, shopping centers, business centers, office buildings, commercial
properties, and residential units.

Centennial Corporation ("CC"), a privately-held corporation, whose stock is
owned by affiliates of Ronald R. White and John B. Joseph, was voted in as new
general partner in the first quarter of 1994. CC was incorporated in 1983 to
engage in the real estate lending business and to provide consulting services.


Identification of Executive Officers

The Partnership does not have officers as such. The affairs of the
Partnership are managed by the general partners noted above.

ITEM 11. MANAGEMENT REMUNERATION AND TRANSACTIONS

The following table summarizes the types and recipients of compensation paid
and to be paid to the general partners and affiliates by the Partnership.


Amount Earned/
Type of Reimbursable for the
Compensation & Year Ended
Name of Entity Description of Payment December 31, 2000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating Stage:

Application and An amount up to a maximum $ ---
commitment fees of 3 percent of the gross
- - the general proceeds of the offering
partner or on any single mortgage
affiliates investment, and an aggregate
maximum of 7 percent of the
gross proceeds of the offering,
payable to the general partners
or affiliates. The application
and commitment fees are payable
solely from borrowers and
prospective borrowers and not
directly from the proceeds of
the offering.


General partners' The general partners or affiliates $ 104,000 (1)
reimbursable shall be entitled to reimbursement
expenses for certain expenses, subject to
- general the conditions of the Partnership
partner or Agreement.
affiliates

General partners' A 5 percent interest in cash $ ---
interest in cash flow available for distribution
distributions for any year until all limited
- - general partnership unit holders have
partners or received an amount equal to a 12
affiliates percent non-cumulative annual
return on their adjusted invested
capital, and 10 percent of the
balance of any cash flow available
for distribution for such year

Mortgage 1/4 of 1 percent of the $ ---
investment maximum amount funded or to
servicing fees be funded by the Partnership
on mortgage investments
serviced by CC
Repayment Stage:

General partners' One percent of mortgage $ ---
share of reductions until all limited
mortgage partners have received an
reductions amount equal to their adjusted
- - general invested capital and cumulative
partners or distributions (including cash
affiliates flow available for distribution)
equal to a 12 percent annual
return with respect to their
adjusted invested capital, and
15 percent of the balance of
any mortgage reductions.

(1) Such reimbursable expenses include salaries and related salary expenses
for services which could be performed directly for the Partnership by
independent parties such as legal, clerical, accounting, financial reporting,
governmental reporting, transfer agent, data processing and duplication
services. Such reimbursement of expenses will be made regardless of whether
any distributions are made to the limited partners.









































ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

(a) Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

No persons are known by the Partnership to own beneficially more than 5
percent of the limited partnership units at December 31, 2000.

(b) Security Ownership of Management

The percent of units owned by Management is less than 1 percent.

Name and address Nature and Number of Percent of
of Beneficial Owner Units Outstanding Units Outstanding
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ronald R. White
1540 S. Lewis St.
Anaheim, CA 92805 Limited partnership units: 1 ---

(c) Change in Control

The Partnership knows of no contractual arrangements which may at a subsequent
date result in a change of control of the Partnership.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.

This disclosure is made in note 5 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements incorporated in this filing.

PART IV

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.

(a)(1) and (a)(2) - See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and
Schedules attached hereto.

(a)(3) - Exhibits.

(3) & (4) Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

The Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Partnership's
Prospectus contained in the Partnership's registration
Statement on Form Form S-11 (Commission File No. 0-15448)
Dated January 17, 1986, as supplemented filed under the Securities
Act of 1933





(b)(4) - Reports on Form 8-K.

None.






Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

CENTENNIAL MORTGAGE INCOME FUND II AND SUBSIDIARIES
A California Limited Partnership


By:/s/John B. Joseph
_________________________________
John B. Joseph
General Partner March 30, 2001


By:/s/Ronald R. White
_________________________________
Ronald R. White
General Partner March 30, 2001


By: CENTENNIAL CORPORATION
General Partner


/s/John B. Joseph
_________________________________
John B. Joseph
Executive Vice President March 30, 2001


/s/Ronald R. White
_________________________________
Ronald R. White
President March 30, 2001


/s/Joel H. Miner
_________________________________
Joel H. Miner
Chief Financial Officer March 30, 2001


























CENTENNIAL MORTGAGE INCOME FUND II AND SUBSIDIARIES

A Limited Partnership






ANNUAL REPORT


























Form 10-K

Consolidated Financial Statements
Items 8, 14(a)(1) and 14(a)(2)
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
(With Independent Auditors' Report Thereon)








F-1

CENTENNIAL MORTGAGE INCOME FUND II AND SUBSIDIARIES
A Limited Partnership

Items 8, 14(a)(1) and 14(a)(2)
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules

Consolidated Financial Statements Page

Independent Auditors' Report F-3

Consolidated Balance Sheets --
December 31, 2000 and 1999 F-4

Consolidated Statements of Operations --
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 F-5

Consolidated Statements of Partners' Equity --
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 F-6

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows --
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 F-7

Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements F-9

Schedules

Schedule III - Consolidated Real Estate Owned F-21

Schedule IV - Mortgage Loans on Real Estate F-22

All other schedules are omitted as the required information is inapplicable,
or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or
notes thereto.























F-2


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT



To the General Partners
Centennial Mortgage Income Fund II:

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Centennial Mortgage
Income Fund II, a limited partnership, and subsidiaries as listed in the
accompanying index. In connection with our audits of the consolidated
financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedules
as listed in the accompanying index. These consolidated financial statements
and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Centennial
Mortgage Income Fund II and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and
the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our
opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

KPMG LLP

Orange County, California
February 26, 2001


















F-3

CENTENNIAL MORTGAGE INCOME FUND II AND SUBSIDIARIES
A Limited Partnership

Consolidated Balance Sheets

December 31, 2000 and 1999


ASSETS 2000 1999
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash and cash equivalents (note 5) $ 1,674,000 $ 2,039,000

Real estate loans receivable, earning --- 543,000
Real estate loans receivable from
unconsolidated investee,
nonearning (note 5) --- 5,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net real estate loans receivable --- 548,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Real estate owned, held
for sale (note 6) 1,511,000 2,843,000

Less allowance for possible losses on
real estate owned (note 4) 1,112,000 1,112,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net real estate owned 399,000 1,731,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Due from unconsolidated investee --- 2,000
Other assets, net --- 5,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 2,073,000 $ 4,325,000
==============================================================================

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' EQUITY
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accounts payable
and accrued liabilities 11,000 65,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total liabilities 11,000 65,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Partners' equity (deficit) --
29,141 limited partnership units
outstanding in 2000 and 1999
General partners (56,000) (56,000)
Limited partners 2,118,000 4,316,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total partners' equity 2,062,000 4,260,000

Contingencies (note 7)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 2,073,000 $ 4,325,000
==============================================================================



See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-4

CENTENNIAL MORTGAGE INCOME FUND II AND SUBSIDIARIES
A Limited Partnership

Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998


2000 1999 1998
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Revenue:
Interest on loans to affiliates,
including fees (note 5) $ --- $ --- $ 16,000
Interest on loans to
nonaffiliates 32,000 45,000 12,000
Interest on interest-bearing
deposits (note 5) 137,000 55,000 78,000
Income from operations
of real estate owned --- 173,000 160,000
Gain (loss)on sale of real estate
owned --- (5,000) 192,000
Other 12,000 9,000 21,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total revenue 181,000 277,000 479,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expenses:
Provision for possible losses
(notes 3 and 4) 32,000 --- 460,000
Share of losses in unconsolidated
investee (note 5) --- --- 96,000
Operating expenses from operations
of real estate owned --- 93,000 92,000
Operating expenses from operations
of real estate owned paid to
affiliates (note 5) --- 12,000 12,000
Expenses associated with
non-operating real estate owned 45,000 105,000 232,000
Depreciation and amortization expense --- 4,000 4,000
Interest expense --- 37,000 16,000
General and administrative,
affiliates (note 5) 104,000 192,000 257,000
General and administrative,
nonaffiliates 71,000 88,000 64,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total expenses 252,000 531,000 1,233,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net loss $ (71,000) $ (254,000) $ (754,000)
==============================================================================
Net loss per limited partnership
unit - basic and diluted $ ( 2.44) $ (8.72) $ (25.87)
==============================================================================






See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-5

CENTENNIAL MORTGAGE INCOME FUND II AND SUBSIDIARIES
A Limited Partnership

Consolidated Statements of Partners' Equity
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998



Total
General Limited Partners'
Partners Partners Equity
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Balance (deficit) at
December 31, 1997 (195,000) 8,959,000 8,764,000

Net loss --- (754,000) (754,000)

Distribution to
limited partners --- (3,496,000) (3,496,000)

Reduction in general
partner deficit capital
account (note 1) 139,000 (139,000) ---
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance (deficit) at
December 31, 1998 (56,000) 4,570,000 4,514,000

Net loss --- (254,000) (254,000)

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance (deficit) at
December 31, 1999 $ (56,000) $ 4,316,000 $ 4,260,000

Net loss --- (71,000) (71,000)

Distribution to
limited partners --- (2,127,000) (2,127,000)

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance (deficit) at
December 31, 2000 (56,000) 2,118,000 2,062,000
==============================================================================














See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-6

CENTENNIAL MORTGAGE INCOME FUND II AND SUBSIDIARIES
A Limited Partnership

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998


2000 1999 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss $ (71,000) $ (254,000) $ (754,000)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss
to net cash used in
operating activities:
Provision for possible losses 32,000 --- 460,000
Depreciation and amortization --- 4,000 4,000
Gain (loss) on sale of real estate
owned --- 5,000 (192,000)
Equity in losses of
unconsolidated investee --- --- 96,000
Changes in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in other assets 5,000 13,000 (22,000)
Increase (decrease) in accounts
payable and accrued liabilities (54,000) (7,000) 63,000
Increase (decrease) in property
taxes payable on real estate owned --- --- (484,000)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash used in operating activities (88,000) (239,000) (829,000)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Principal collected on loans 520,000 50,000 615,000
Advances on loans receivable
- earning (4,000) --- ---
Advances on loans made to
unconsolidated investee --- --- (295,000)
Capital expenditures
for real estate owned --- (27,000) (154,000)
Proceeds from sale of
real estate owned 1,332,000 1,479,000 4,823,000
Decrease in due from
unconsolidated investee 2,000 --- 14,000
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by
investing activities 1,850,000 1,502,000 5,003,000
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------










See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-7

CENTENNIAL MORTGAGE INCOME FUND II AND SUBSIDIARIES
A Limited Partnership

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998


2000 1999 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Advances on notes payable --- --- 235,000
Principal payments on notes payable --- (234,000) (98,000)
Distributions to limited partners (2,127,000) --- (3,496,000)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash used in financing activities(2,127,000) (234,000) (3,359,000)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents (365,000) 1,029,000 815,000
Cash and cash equivalents
at beginning of year 2,039,000 1,010,000 195,000
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents
at end of year $ 1,674,000 $ 2,039,000 $1,010,000
=============================================================================
Supplemental schedule of cash
flow information - interest
paid during the year $ --- $ 29,000 $ 16,000
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supplemental schedule of
noncash investing and
financing activities:
Decrease in allowance for
possible losses on real
estate loans and on real
estate owned as a result
of sales and chargeoffs --- 299,000 1,766,000
Decrease in allowance for possible
loans receivable and loans receivable
as a result of chargeoffs 32,000 --- ---
Receipt of notes receivable as
partial repayment
of note receivable --- --- 586,000














See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-8

CENTENNIAL MORTGAGE INCOME FUND II AND SUBSIDIARIES
A Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2000, 1999, 1998

(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING P0LICIES

Business

Centennial Mortgage Income Fund II (the "Partnership") was formed in 1985 and
initially invested in commercial, industrial and residential income-producing
real property through mortgage investments consisting of participating first
mortgage loans, other equity participation loans, construction loans, and
wrap-around and other junior loans. The Partnership's underwriting policy for
granting credit was to fund loans secured by first and second deeds of trust
on real property. The Partnership's area of concentration is in California.
In the normal course of business, the Partnership participated with other
lenders in extending credit to single borrowers. The Partnership did this in
an effort to decrease credit concentrations and provide a greater
diversification of credit risk.

As of December 31, 2000, all of the loans secured by operating properties have
been repaid to the Partnership. However, during the early 1990's, real estate
market values for undeveloped land in California declined severely. As the
loans secured by undeveloped land became delinquent, the Partnership elected
to foreclose on certain of these loans, thereby increasing real estate owned
balances. As a result, the Partnership has become a direct investor in this
real estate. The real estate owned balance before allowance for possible
losses at December 31, 1997 was $10,827,000, decreasing to $4,599,000 at year
end 1998, $2,843,000 at year end 1999 and decreasing to $1,511,000 at year end
2000.

Beginning with the fourth quarter of 1992, the Partnership entered its
repayment stage and cash proceeds from mortgage investments are no longer
available for reinvestment in new loans by the Partnership.

Basis of Presentation

The Partnership has formed several subsidiaries to own and operate certain of
its real estate assets. The corporations formed were PIR Development, Inc.
("PIR"), RSA Development, Inc. ("RSA"), CTA Development, Inc. ("CTA") and LCR
Development, Inc., ("LCR"). All of these corporations are California
corporations. Several of the Partnership's assets were transferred to these
corporations, at the Partnership's cost basis, in transactions which included
no cash down and the Partnership carrying 100 percent of the financing. RSA
and CTA were liquidated during 1998 and 2000, respectively. The Partnership
reduced the carrying value of its investment in LCR to $-0- during 2000. With
the exception of LCR, all of these corporations are wholly owned corporations
and have been consolidated in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements. All significant intercompany balances and transactions, including
the aforementioned transfers, have been eliminated in consolidation.

As the Partnership's ownership interest in LCR is more than 20 percent but
does not exceed 50 percent, the Partnership has accounted for its ownership
interest using the equity method. The Partnership made several loans to LCR


F-9

and its subsidiary. Under the equity method of accounting, these loans were a
component of the Partnership's investment in LCR, and therefore the
Partnership recorded losses by LCR as a reduction of the carrying value of
these loans receivable (see note 5).

Organization

The Partnership was organized on July 12, 1985 in accordance with the
provisions of the California Uniform Limited Partnership Act. The Partnership
commenced operations in June 1986. The general partners are John B. Joseph,
Ronald R. White and Centennial Corporation ("CC"), a privately-held California
corporation whose stock is owned by affiliates of Ronald R. White and John B.
Joseph.

Partners' Capital Accounts

Cash Available for Distribution, as defined in the Partnership Agreement, is
to be allocated 95 percent to the limited partners and 5 percent to the
general partners until each limited partner has received an amount equal to a
12 percent non-cumulative annual return on his adjusted invested capital (as
defined in the Partnership Agreement). Thereafter, Cash Available for
Distribution is to be allocated 90 percent to the limited partners and 10
percent to the general partners. All distributions of Mortgage Reductions (as
defined in the Partnership Agreement) after the first sixty months following
the closing date of the Partnership, shall be distributed 99 percent to the
limited partners and 1 percent to the general partners, until each limited
partner has received a 12 percent cumulative annual return on his adjusted
invested capital, after which such amounts are to be distributed 85 percent to
the limited partners and 15 percent to the general partners. In order to
properly reflect the economic effect of the allocations discussed above, the
Partnership has allocated financial statement net earnings (losses) 95 percent
to the limited partners and 5 percent to the general partners through 1992.
The Partnership had no Cash Available for Distribution during the three years
ended December 31, 2000.

Based upon these and various other terms of the Partnership Agreement, it is
improbable that the general partners would be required to make any capital
contributions to the Partnership in excess of their negative capital account
as of December 31, 1992. Accordingly, since January 1, 1993, the Partnership
has allocated 100 percent of the losses to the limited partners. As a result
of the liquidation of the majority of the Partnership's investments in 1998,
it became clear that the amount of the required deficit restoration of the
General Partners would not exceed $56,000 and the capital accounts of the
General Partners and limited partners were adjusted in 1998 to reflect such
maximum deficit restoration

Real Estate Loans and Allowance for Possible Losses

Loans were reported at the principal amount outstanding, net of unearned
income and the allowance for possible loan losses. Interest accrual was
discontinued when, in the opinion of management, its collection was deemed
doubtful. The allowance for possible loan losses was established through a
provision for possible losses charged to expense. Loans were charged against
the allowance for possible loan losses when management believed that the
collectibility of principal was unlikely.



F-10

Impaired Loans

The Partnership considered a loan to be impaired when based upon current
information and events, it believed it was probable that the Partnership would
be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the
loan agreement. In determining impairment, the Partnership considered large
non-homogeneous loans including nonaccrual loans, troubled debt restructuring
and performing loans which exhibited, among other characteristics, high loan-
to-value ratios, low debt-coverage ratios, or other indications that the
borrowers were experiencing increased levels of financial difficulty. The
Partnership based the measurement of collateral-dependent impaired loans on
the fair value of the loan's collateral. The amount by which the recorded
investment of the loan exceeded the measure of the impaired loan's value was
recognized by recording a valuation allowance.

Real Estate Owned

Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying
amount or fair value less costs to sell. Estimated fair values are determined
by using appraisals, discounted cash flows and/or other valuation techniques.
The actual market price of real estate can only be determined by negotiation
between independent third parties in a sales transaction and sales proceeds
could differ substantially from estimated fair values. An impairment loss
shall be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset
exceeds the fair value of the assets less costs to sell. Assets to be disposed
of are not depreciated while they are held for disposal. The Partnership
considered all real estate owned as held for sale during 2000 and 1999, and is
actively marketing all properties using third party brokers or in house sales
staff. Management's intent is to attempt to sell all properties within one
year, however, there can be no assurance that the balance of the Partnership's
assets will actually be sold in that period.

Income Taxes

Under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and the California Revenue and
Taxation Code, partnerships are generally not subject to income taxes. For
tax purposes, any income or losses realized are those of the individual
partners, not the Partnership. The Partnership reports certain transactions
differently for tax and financial statement purposes. The following is a
recap of current and cumulative temporary differences between earnings for
generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") and taxable earnings.

















F-11



Current Temporary
Differences Partnership Corporations Total
(Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GAAP earnings (loss) for
the year ended
December 31, 2000 $ (30,000) $ (41,000) $ (71,000)
Provision for losses --- --- ---
Accrued expenses not previously
deducted under the cash basis
method of accounting (42,000) --- (42,000)
Carrying costs expensed
for books and capitalized for
tax purposes --- 77,000 77,000)
Decrease in net operating loss --- (36,000) (36,000)
Share of losses of subsidiaries (8,000) --- (8,000)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Taxable loss for the year
ended December 31, 2000 $ (80,000) $ --- $ (80,000)
==============================================================================
Taxable loss allocable to
General Partner ---
==============================================================================
Taxable loss per limited
partner unit $ (2.75)
==============================================================================



Cumulative Temporary Differences as of December 31, 2000
Partnership Corporations
(Unaudited) (Unaudited)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net operating loss carry forwards $ --- $ 291,000
Provision for losses --- 1,112,000
Accrued expenses not deducted
under the cash basis --- 1,841,000
Carrying costs expensed for books and
capitalized for tax purposes --- 852,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cumulative
temporary differences $ --- $ 4,096,000
==============================================================================


As of December 31, 2000, the Partnership held approximately $4.3 million in
loans and interest receivable from the consolidated corporations. These loans
have been eliminated in the Partnership's consolidated financial statements.
It is anticipated that the temporary differences should reverse on the
corporations' returns when the corporations liquidate their investments. If
these investments are liquidated at current carrying values, the Partnership
should be able to deduct bad debt expense on its tax returns in the
approximate amount of the temporary differences shown above which is
approximately $141 per limited partnership unit.
F-12

The subsidiary corporations are subject to taxation and account for income
taxes under an asset and liability approach to establishing deferred tax
assets and liabilities for the temporary differences between the financial
reporting basis and the tax basis of the corporation's assets and liabilities.
None of the subsidiary corporations have paid any income taxes since their
respective formations and all of them have had net deferred tax assets which
have been fully offset by valuation allowances as of December 31, 2000, 1999
and 1998. Accordingly, no tax expense or benefit has been recorded by these
corporations during the three years ended December 31, 2000. No deferred tax
asset related to the corporations cumulative temporary differences shown above
has been recorded in the consolidated financial statements due to the
improbability of realization. Future consolidated financial statements could
reflect income tax expense in the event that these corporations generate
taxable profits in excess of operating loss carryforwards available. Some of
the subsidiary corporations are cash basis taxpayers.

Statements of Cash Flows

For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash
and interest-bearing deposits with original maturities of three months or
less.

Net Loss Per Limited Partnership Unit

Net loss per limited partnership unit for financial statement purposes was
based on 29,141 weighted average limited partnership units outstanding in
2000, 1999 and 1998.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue from rental income on real estate owned was recognized on a straight-
line basis over the life of the lease when payments become due under operating
leases. The Partnership has recognized gains or losses on the sale of real
estate owned as the gains or losses are determinable and the earnings process
is complete.

Financial Information about Industry Segments

Given that the Partnership is in the process of liquidation, the Partnership
has identified only one operating business segment which is the business of
asset liquidation.







F-13

(2) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107 "Disclosures About Fair
Value of Financial Instruments" ("SFAS 107"), requires that the Partnership
disclose estimated fair values for its financial instruments as well as the
methods and significant assumptions used to estimate fair values. The
following information does not purport to represent the aggregate net fair
value of the Partnership.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Partnership in
estimating the fair value of each class of financial instrument.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The carrying amount, which is cost, is assumed to be the fair value because of
the liquidity of these instruments. As of December 31, 2000, the Partnership
had bank deposits at four different banks whose deposits are federally
insured. Approximately $1,363,000 of the Partnership's cash and cash
equivalent balance as of that same date was in excess of maximum balances
covered by such insurance.

Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities

Carrying value is considered to be equal to the fair value of these
liabilities as they are due on demand.

(3) ALLOWANCE FOR POSSIBLE LOAN LOSSES


Changes in the allowance for possible loan losses are as follows:
2000 1999 1998
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Balance at beginning of year $ --- $ --- $ 15,000
Loans to affiliates and
nonaffiliates charged-off --- --- (15,000)
Provision for possible losses --- --- ---
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at end of year $ --- $ --- $ ---
==============================================================================


(4) ALLOWANCE FOR POSSIBLE LOSSES ON REAL ESTATE OWNED



Changes in the allowance for possible losses on real estate owned are as
follows:
2000 1999 1998
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Balance at beginning of year $ 1,112,000 $ 1,411,000 $ 2,702,000
Real estate owned charged-off --- (299,000) (1,751,000)
Provision for losses --- --- 460,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at end of year $ 1,112,000 $ 1,112,000 $ 1,411,000
==============================================================================

F-14

(5) TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

As discussed in note 1, the Partnership owns 50 percent of the stock of a
corporation which has not been consolidated in the accompanying financial
statements; LCR. The balance of stock in this corporation is owned by
Centennial Mortgage Income Fund ("CMIF"), an affiliate. LCR has invested in a
joint venture, Silverwood Homes ("Silverwood") which has constructed homes.
The Partnership has participated in making several loans to this corporation
and this joint venture. Under the equity method of accounting, these loans
are a component of the Partnership's investment in LCR, and therefore the
Partnership has recorded losses by LCR as a reduction of the carrying value of
these loans receivable. All but one of these loans were charged off in 1998
with the remaining loan being repaid during 2000.

A summary of these real estate loans receivable from unconsolidated investee
as of December 31, 1999 is as follows:




Net
Principal Losses Carrying
Balance Offset Value
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

50 percent interest
in unsecured loan
from Silverwood $ 10,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $ 10,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------


LCR entered into a joint venture agreement entitled Silverwood with Home
Devco, ("Home Devco"), an affiliate of the general partners of the
Partnership, to construct and sell single-family homes at the project. During
1995, LCR contributed 179 lots which were zoned for single family homes in
Lancaster, California to the joint venture as its initial capital
contribution. As LCR has a 99.99 percent ownership interest in the joint
venture, Silverwood has been consolidated with LCR.

The consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations of LCR have not
been consolidated in the Partnership's financial statements. The Partnership
accounted for its investment in this corporation using the equity method. LCR
ceased active operation in 1999 and liquidated the majority of its remaining
assets during 2000. As of December 31, 2000, the Partnership's carrying value
of investments and loans to the joint venture had been reduced to $-0-. The
Partnership recorded losses from this unconsolidated investee of $-0-, $-0-
and $96,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998,
respectively.

The following represents condensed financial information for LCR at December
31, 1998 and for the year ended December 31, 1998:

F-15





LCR Development, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets


December 31,
Assets 1998
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash $ 11,000
Restricted cash 20,000

Real estate owned 119,000
Less allowance for losses on real
estate investments 17,000
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net real estate owned 102,000

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 133,000
==========================================================================

Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes payable to affiliates:
CMIF $ 2,882,000
CMIF II 1,549,000
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total notes payable 4,431,000
Accounts payable
and accrued liabilities 12,000
Interest payable to affiliates 1,837,000
Payable to affiliates 5,000
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total liabilities 6,285,000

Stockholders' deficit (6,152,000)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 133,000
==========================================================================


















F-16


LCR Development, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations

Year ended December 31, 1998




1998
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenues
Housing sales $ 1,509,000
Sale of finished lots 1,499,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
3,008,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Costs and expenses
Cost of housing sales 1,437,000
Cost of sale of finished lots 1,514,000
Provision for losses on real estate owned 216,000
Selling and marketing expenses 66,000
General and administrative 24,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
3,257,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating loss (249,000)
Interest expense 403,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net loss $ (652,000)
========================================================================
Interest not included in share of losses (460,000)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allocable net loss $ (192,000)
========================================================================
Share of loss recorded $ (96,000)
========================================================================

The Partnership and CMIF did not record interest income in connection with
the $1,837,000 of accrued interest payable to affiliates by LCR and
Silverwood. Accordingly, the Partnership did not record its share of losses
from LCR to the extent that it represented this nonaccrued interest income.

The Partnership reimburses the general partner for salaries and related
expenses incurred on behalf of the Partnership for services such as legal,
clerical, accounting, property management and other administrative functions.
The general partners and affiliates charged $104,000 $170,000 and $202,000 for
such services in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The Partnership also
accrued an additional $22,000 and $67,000 as general and administrative,
affiliates expense during 1999 and 1998, respectively. These amounts were the
Partnership's share of certain severance pay due under several employment
contracts entered into during 1998.

During 1999 and 1998, the Partnership maintained interest-bearing deposits
with Sunwest Bank, an affiliate of the general partners up until March 1999.
Interest earned on such deposits for three months ended March 31, 1999 and the
year ended December 31, 1998 was $1,000 and $16,000, respectively.

F-17

(6) REAL ESTATE OWNED



Real estate owned consists of the following:


December 31, December 31,
2000 1999
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Land in Sacramento, CA 1,511,000 2,843,000

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total real estate owned $ 1,511,000 $ 2,843,000
==============================================================================


The Partnership sold approximately 9.45 acres of its 37.28 acre parcel of land
in Sacramento in June 1999. The sale generated net sales proceeds of
$842,000. The Partnership recorded no gain or loss on this sale.

The Partnership also sold its office building in San Bernardino in December
1999. The sale generated net sales proceeds of $637,000. The sale resulted
in a $5,000 loss after applying $299,000 of the Partnership's previously
recorded allowance for possible losses on real estate investments. A note
payable with a principal balance of approximately $230,000 was repaid with
funds from the proceeds of this sale.

The Partnership sold approximately 7.13 acres of its 37.28 acre parcel of land
in Sacramento in February 2000. The sale generated net sales proceeds of
$846,000. The Partnership recorded no gain or loss on this sale.

The Partnership sold approximately 2.65 acres of its 37.28 acre parcel of land
in Sacramento in August 2000. The sale generated net sales proceeds of
$486,000. The Partnership recorded no gain or loss on this sale.

As of December 31, 2000, the Partnership still held approximately 18 acres of
the 37.28 acre parcel in Sacramento with a net carrying value of $399,000,
after deducting an allowance for possible losses of $1,112,000.


(7) Contingencies

There are no pending legal proceedings.














F-18


(8) QUARTERLY FINANCIAL RESULTS (UNAUDITED)



Quarter Ended
December 31, September 30, June 30, March 31,
2000 2000 2000 2000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REVENUE:
Interest income on loans $ --- $ 11,000 $ 10,000 $ 11,000
Interest on interest-bearing deposits 31,000 44,000 36,000 26,000
Other 5,000 4,000 2,000 1,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total revenue 36,000 59,000 48,000 38,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXPENSES:
Provision for losses 2,000 30,000 --- ---
Expenses associated with non-operating
real estate owned 5,000 8,000 10,000 22,000
General and administrative 40,000 41,000 44,000 50,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total expenses 47,000 79,000 54,000 72,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net loss $ (11,000) $ (20,000) $ (6,000) $ (34,000)
==========================================================================================
Net loss per limited partnership
unit-basic and diluted $ (.38) $ (.69) $ (.20) $ (1.17)
==========================================================================================










F-19

(8) QUARTERLY FINANCIAL RESULTS (UNAUDITED)(CONTINUED)




Quarter Ended
December 31, September 30, June 30, March 31,
1999 1999 1999 1999
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REVENUE:
Interest income on loans $ 11,000 $ 10,000 $ 12,000 $ 12,000
Interest on interest-bearing deposits 19,000 19,000 8,000 9,000
Income from operations of real
owned 38,000 43,000 48,000 44,000
Loss on sale of real estate owend (5,000) --- --- ---
Other 1,000 2,000 2,000 4,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total revenue 64,000 74,000 70,000 69,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXPENSES:
Operating expenses from operations
of real estate owned 28,000 30,000 27,000 24,000
Expenses associated with non-operating
real estate owned 53,000 27,000 12,000 13,000
Interest expense 21,000 6,000 5,000 5,000
General and administrative 52,000 48,000 44,000 136,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total expenses 154,000 111,000 88,000 178,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net loss $ (90,000) $ (37,000) $ (18,000) $ (109,000)
==========================================================================================
Net loss per limited partnership
unit-basic and diluted $ (3.09) $ (1.27) $ (.62) $ (3.74)
==========================================================================================








F-20

CENTENNIAL MORTGAGE INCOME FUND II AND SUBSIDIARIES
A Limited Partnership
Consolidated Real Estate Owned
December 31, 2000


Schedule III
Initial Costs Capitalized Gross Amount at
Cost to Subsequent Which Carried
Partnership to Acquisition on Books

Total
Real Real Life on Which
Encum- Estate Improvements Carrying Estate Date Depreciation is
Property brances Owned Costs Owned Acquired Computed
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

18 Acres in Sacramento --- 1,269,000 153,000 89,000 1,511,000 March-92 None
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ --- $ 1,269,000 $ 153,000 $ 89,000 $ 1,511,000
===========================================================================================================

Aggregate cost for Federal income tax purposes is $2,364,000 at December 31, 2000.



The following is a summary of consolidated real estate owned for the three years ended December 31, 2000.


2000 1999 1998
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Balance at beginning of year $ 2,843,000 $ 4,599,000 $ 10,827,000
Additions during period:
Improvements --- 27,000 154,000
Deductions during period:
Real estate sold (1,332,000) (1,783,000) (4,631,000)
Charge-offs --- --- (1,751,000)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at year end $ 1,511,000 $ 2,843,000 $ 4,599,000
=============================================================================================================

See accompanying independent auditors report
F-21
CENTENNIAL MORTGAGE INCOME FUND II AND SUBSIDIARIES
A Limited Partnership

MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
December 31, 2000


SCHEDULE IV

Principal
Amount
of Loan
Subject to
Final Periodic Face Carrying Delinquent
Interest Maturity Payment Prior Amount of Amount of Principal or
Description Rate Date Terms Liens Mortgages Mortgages or Interest
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No mortgages outstanding as of December 31, 2000 --- ---
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

$ --- $ ---
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The following is a summary of activity for the years ended December 2000, 1999 and 1998.

2000 1999 1998
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at beginning of year $ 548,000 $ 598,000 $ 1,029,000
Additions during period:
New mortgage loans/disbursements 4,000 --- 295,000
Loans transferred from real estate owned --- --- ---

Deductions during period:
Collections of principal (520,000) (50,000) (615,000)
Chargeoffs (32,000) --- (15,000)
Losses from unconsolidated investees --- --- (96,000)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at year end $ --- $ 548,000 $ 598,000
============================================================================================================

See accompanying independent auditors' report.
F-22