Back to GetFilings.com
-------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10 - Q
[X] Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the quarterly period ended June 29, 2003
[ ] Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
For the Transition Period From ___ to___
Commission File Number 0-19084
PMC-Sierra, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
A Delaware Corporation - I.R.S. NO. 94-2925073
3975 Freedom Circle
Santa Clara, CA 95054
(408) 239-8000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days.
Yes ___X____ No _______
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes ___X____ No _______
Common shares outstanding at July 30, 2003 - 170,438,958
------------------------------------------------
INDEX
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements Page
- Condensed consolidated statements of operations 3
- Condensed consolidated balance sheets 4
- Condensed consolidated statements of cash flows 5
- Notes to the condensed consolidated
financial statements 6
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations 14
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk 37
Item 4. Controls and Procedures 38
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 4. Submission of matters to a vote by stockholders 39
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8 - K 39
Signatures 40
Certifications 41
2
Part I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 - Financial Statements
PMC-Sierra, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except for per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Three months ended Six Months Ended
----------------------------- ----------------------------
Jun 29, Jun 30, Jun 29, Jun 30,
2003 2002 2003 2002
Net revenues
Networking $ 59,610 $ 53,885 $ 114,996 $ 100,737
Non-networking 768 626 768 5,216
-------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Total 60,378 54,511 115,764 105,953
Cost of revenues 21,301 20,774 43,186 41,317
-------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Gross profit 39,077 33,737 72,578 64,636
Other costs and expenses:
Research and development 32,173 34,438 63,121 70,672
Marketing, general and administrative 12,151 16,451 24,767 33,562
Amortization of deferred stock compensation:
Research and development (82) 764 317 1,685
Marketing, general and administrative 95 61 108 127
Restructuring costs 7,260 - 13,904 -
-------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Loss from operations (12,520) (17,977) (29,639) (41,410)
Interest and other income, net (106) 1,339 442 2,760
Net gain on investments 1,962 619 2,493 3,064
-------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Loss before recovery of income taxes (10,664) (16,019) (26,704) (35,586)
Recovery of income taxes (1,499) (4,428) (6,024) (10,315)
-------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Net loss $ (9,165) $ (11,591) $ (20,680) $ (25,271)
============== ============= ============= =============
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted $ (0.05) $ (0.07) $ (0.12) $ (0.15)
============== ============= ============= =============
Shares used in per share calculation - basic and diluted 172,289 169,798 171,846 169,656
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
3
PMC-Sierra, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except par value)
Jun 29, Dec 29,
2003 2002
(unaudited)
ASSETS:
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 300,196 $ 70,504
Short-term investments 172,401 340,826
Restricted cash 6,037 5,329
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $2,819 ($2,781 in 2002) 20,727 16,621
Inventories 22,057 26,420
Deferred tax assets 1,123 1,083
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 16,235 15,499
Short-term deposits for wafer fabrication capacity 9,147 -
-------------- --------------
Total current assets 547,923 476,282
Investment in bonds and notes 84,743 148,894
Other investments and assets 9,426 21,978
Deposits for wafer fabrication capacity 4,779 21,992
Property and equipment, net 37,621 51,189
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net 7,907 8,381
-------------- --------------
$ 692,399 $ 728,716
============== ==============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 18,829 $ 24,697
Accrued liabilities 53,728 53,530
Income taxes payable 15,605 21,553
Accrued restructuring costs 120,886 129,499
Deferred income 17,002 17,982
-------------- --------------
Total current liabilities 226,050 247,261
Convertible subordinated notes 275,000 275,000
Deferred tax liabilities 74 2,764
PMC special shares convertible into 3,104 (2002 - 3,196)
shares of common stock 4,891 5,052
Stockholders' equity
Common stock and additional paid in capital, par value $.001:
900,000 shares authorized; 169,295 shares issued and
outstanding (2002 - 167,400) 845,815 834,265
Deferred stock compensation (412) (1,158)
Accumulated other comprehensive income 68 3,939
Accumulated deficit (659,087) (638,407)
-------------- --------------
Total stockholders' equity 186,384 198,639
-------------- --------------
$ 692,399 $ 728,716
============== ==============
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
4
PMC-Sierra, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
Six Months Ended
------------------------------
Jun 29, Jun 30,
2003 2002
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss $ (20,680) $ (25,271)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities:
Depreciation of property and equipment 15,031 21,154
Amortization of other intangibles 474 570
Amortization of deferred stock compensation 425 1,812
Amortization of debt issuance costs 782 782
Gain on sale of investments and other assets (5,980) (3,074)
Impairment of other investments 3,500 -
Noncash restructuring costs 1,311 -
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (4,106) 2,169
Inventories 4,363 2,876
Prepaid expenses and other current assets (1,037) (2,739)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (5,670) 2,336
Income taxes payable (5,948) 1,168
Accrued restructuring costs (8,698) (18,089)
Deferred income (980) (4,448)
-------------- --------------
Net cash used in operating activities (27,213) (20,754)
-------------- --------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Change in restricted cash (708) -
Purchases of short-term investments (71,239) (5,439)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of short-term investments 244,369 64,148
Purchases of long-term bonds and notes (95,874) (89,853)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of long-term bonds and notes 155,225 20,879
Purchases of other investments (700) (602)
Proceeds from sales of other investments 8,402 4,993
Proceeds from refund of wafer fabrication deposits 8,066 -
Purchases of property and equipment (2,346) (1,985)
-------------- --------------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 245,195 (7,859)
-------------- --------------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayment of capital leases and long-term debt - (312)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock 11,710 8,810
-------------- --------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 11,710 8,498
-------------- --------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 229,692 (20,115)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period 70,504 152,120
-------------- --------------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period $ 300,196 $ 132,005
============== ==============
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest $ 5,156 $ 5,414
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
5
PMC-Sierra, Inc.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
NOTE 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description of business. PMC-Sierra, Inc (the "Company" or "PMC") designs,
develops, markets and supports high-speed broadband communications and storage
semiconductors and MIPS-based processors for service provider, enterprise,
storage, and wireless networking equipment. The Company offers worldwide
technical and sales support through a network of offices in North America,
Europe and Asia.
Basis of presentation. The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or
omitted pursuant to those rules or regulations. The interim financial statements
are unaudited, but reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of
management, necessary to provide a fair statement of results for the interim
periods presented. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2002. The results of
operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to
be expected in future periods.
Estimates. The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Estimates
are used for, but not limited to, the accounting for doubtful accounts,
inventory reserves, depreciation and amortization, asset impairments, sales
returns, warranty costs, income taxes, restructuring costs and contingencies.
Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first out)
or market (estimated net realizable value). The components of inventories are as
follows:
Jun 29, Dec 29,
(in thousands) 2003 2002
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Work-in-progress $ 7,937 $ 11,663
Finished goods 14,120 14,757
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
$ 22,057 $ 26,420
============ =============
Product warranties. The Company provides a one-year limited warranty on most of
its standard products and accrues for the cost of this warranty at the time of
shipment. The Company estimates its warranty costs based on historical failure
rates and related repair or replacement costs. The change in the Company's
accrued warranty obligations from December 31, 2002 to June 29, 2003 is as
follows:
6
Six months
ended June 29, 2003
(in thousands)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beginning balance $ 2,399
Accrual for new warranties issued 558
Reduction for payments (in cash or in kind) (216)
Adjustments related to changes in estimate
of warranty accrual (111)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ending balance, June 29, 2003 $ 2,630
==================
Derivatives and Hedging Activities. PMC's net income (loss) and cash flows may
be negatively impacted by fluctuating foreign exchange rates. The Company
periodically hedges foreign currency forecasted transactions related to certain
operating expenses. All derivatives are recorded in the balance sheet at fair
value. For a derivative designated as a fair value hedge, changes in the fair
value of the derivative and of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk
are recognized in net income (loss). For a derivative designated as a cash flow
hedge, the effective portions of changes in the fair value of the derivative are
recorded in other comprehensive income and are recognized in net income (loss)
when the hedged item affects net income (loss). Ineffective portions of changes
in the fair value of cash flow hedges are recognized in net income (loss). If
the derivative used in an economic hedging relationship is not designated in an
accounting hedging relationship or if it becomes ineffective, changes in the
fair value of the derivative are recognized in net income (loss).
Stock based compensation. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in
accordance with the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25 (APB
25), "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees". Under APB 25, compensation is
measured as the amount by which the market price of the underlying stock exceeds
the exercise price of the option on the date of grant; this compensation is
amortized over the vesting period.
Pro forma information regarding net income (loss) and net income (loss) per
share is required by SFAS 123, " Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" for
awards granted or modified after December 31, 1994 as if the Company had
accounted for its stock-based awards to employees under the fair value method of
SFAS 123. The fair value of the Company's stock-based awards to employees was
estimated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes model
was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have
no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, the
Black-Scholes model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions
including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company's stock-based
awards to employees have characteristics significantly different from those of
traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can
materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing
models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of
its stock-based awards to employees. The fair value of the Company's stock-based
awards to employees was estimated using both the single and multiple option
approach, recognizing forfeitures as they occur, assuming no expected dividends
and using the following weighted average assumptions:
7
Three Months Ended
----------------------------------------------------
Options ESPP
------------------------- ------------------------
June 29, June 30, June 29, June 30,
2003 2002 2003 2002
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expected life (years) 2.6 2.8 1.2 0.6
Expected volatility 102% 101% 105% 121%
Risk-free interest rate 1.6% 2.8% 1.4% 2.3%
Six Months Ended
---------------------------------------------------
Options ESPP
------------------------ ------------------------
June 29, June 30, June 29, June 30,
2003 2002 2003 2002
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expected life (years) 2.8 2.8 1.1 0.6
Expected volatility 101% 101% 107% 120%
Risk-free interest rate 1.8% 2.8% 1.5% 2.9%
The weighted-average estimated fair values of employee stock options granted for
the three months ending June 30, 2003 and 2002 were $4.99 and $8.25 per share,
respectively. The weighted-average estimated fair values of employee stock
options granted for the six months ending June 30, 2003 and 2002 were $3.64 and
$8.29 per share, respectively.
If the Company had accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with the
fair value method as prescribed by SFAS 123, net loss and net loss per share
would have been:
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
----------------------------- -----------------------------
June 29, June 30, June 29, June 30,
(in thousands, except per share amounts) 2003 2002 2003 2002
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
Net loss, as reported $ (9,165) $ (11,591) $ (20,680) $ (25,271)
Adjustments:
Additional stock-based employee compensation expense
under fair value based method for all awards (13,232) (27,479) (35,764) (58,317)
-------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Net loss, adjusted $ (22,397) $ (39,070) $ (56,444) $ (83,588)
============== ============== ============== ==============
Basic and diluted net loss per share, as reported $ (0.05) $ (0.07) $ (0.12) $ (0.15)
============== ============== ============== ==============
Basic and diluted net loss per share, adjusted $ (0.13) $ (0.23) $ (0.33) $ (0.49)
============== ============== ============== ==============
8
Recently issued accounting standards. In May 2003, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement No. 150 (SFAS No. 150), "Accounting for
Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and
Equities". SFAS 150 requires certain financial instruments that were accounted
for as equity under previous guidance to now be accounted for as a liability.
SFAS No. 150 applies to mandatorily redeemable stock and certain financial
instruments that require or may require settlement by transferring cash or other
assets. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or
modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the
first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company has not issued
any financial instruments that fall under the scope of SFAS No. 150 and does not
expect that the adoption of this Statement will have a material impact on its
results of operations and financial position.
In April 2003, SFAS No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities," was issued. In general, this statement
amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments, including certain
derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities
under SFAS No. 133. This statement is effective for contracts entered into or
modified after June 30, 2003, and for hedging relationships designated after
June 30, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 149 is not expected to have a material
impact on the Company's consolidated financial position or disclosures.
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), "Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities", an Interpretation of ARB No. 51. FIN 46 requires
certain variable interest entities to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary
of the entity if the equity investors in the entity do not have the
characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient
equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional
subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46 is effective for all
new variable interest entities created or acquired after January 31, 2003. For
variable interest entities created or acquired prior to February 1, 2003, the
provisions of FIN 46 must be applied for the first interim or annual period
beginning after June 15, 2003. PMC does not expect that the adoption of FIN 46
will have a material effect on the Company's results of operations, financial
condition or disclosures.
NOTE 2. Derivatives Instruments and Hedging Activities
PMC generates sales in U.S. dollars but incurs certain operating expenses in
various foreign currencies, primarily the Canadian dollar. To minimize the
short-term impact of foreign currency fluctuations, the Company uses currency
forward contracts.
Currency forward contracts that are used to hedge exposures to variability in
forecasted foreign currency cash flows are designated as cash flow hedges. The
maturities of these instruments are less than twelve months. For these
derivatives, the gain or loss from the effective portion of the hedge is
initially reported as a component of other comprehensive income in stockholder's
equity and subsequently reclassified to earnings in the same period in which the
hedged transaction affects earnings. The gain or loss from the ineffective
portion of the hedge is recognized in interest and other expense immediately.
9
Currency forward contracts that are used to offset the currency risk of
non-U.S.-dollar denominated firm commitments are designated as fair value
hedges. Changes in the fair value of underlying firm commitments are generally
offset by changes in fair value of the related derivative designated as a hedge,
with the resulting net gain or loss, if any, recorded in interest and other
expense.
At June 29, 2003, the Company had a currency forward contract outstanding that
qualified and was designated as a cash flow hedge. The U.S. dollar notional
amount of this contract was $14.4 million and the contract had an immaterial
fair value as of June 29, 2003. No portion of the hedging instrument's gain was
excluded from the assessment of effectiveness and the ineffective portions of
hedges had an insignificant impact on earnings.
NOTE 3. Restructuring and Other Costs
During the first half of 2003, the Company continued to streamline its
operations in accordance with restructuring plans adopted in 2001 and 2003.
Restructuring - October 18, 2001
PMC implemented a restructuring plan in the fourth quarter of 2001 to reduce its
operating cost structure. This restructuring plan included the termination of
341 employees, the consolidation of excess facilities, and the curtailment of
certain research and development projects. As a result, the Company recorded a
restructuring charge of $175.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2001.
Activity in the restructuring reserve during the six-month period ended June 29,
2003 was as follows:
Restructuring Restructuring
Liability at Cash Liability at
(in thousands) December 31, 2002 Payments June 29, 2003
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facility lease and
contract settlement costs $ 129,499 $ (13,114) $ 116,385
====================================================
The Company has completed the restructuring activities contemplated in the
October 2001 plan, but has not yet disposed of all of its surplus leased
facilities as of June 29, 2003.
Restructuring - January 16, 2003
As a result of the prolonged economic downturn in the semiconductor industry,
the Company implemented another corporate restructuring aimed at further
reducing operating expenses on January 16, 2003. The restructuring included the
termination of approximately 175 employees and the closure of design centers in
Maryland, Ireland and India. PMC recorded a restructuring charge of $6.6 million
and $7.3 million in the first and second quarters of 2003, respectively, in
accordance with SFAS 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities". These charges related to workforce reduction, lease and contract
settlement costs and the write-down of certain property, equipment and software
assets whose value was impaired as a result of this restructuring plan.
10
Activity in this restructuring reserve during the six-month period ended June
29, 2003 was as follows:
Restructuring
Total Charge Additional Non-cash Cash Liability at
(in thousands) January 16, 2003 Charges Charges Payments June 30, 2003
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Workforce reduction $ 6,384 $ 812 $ - $ (5,126) $ 2,069
Excess facility costs and 260 4,038 - (2,915) 1,383
contract settlement costs
Obligations related to closure
of development sites - 1,099 - (51) 1,048
Asset writedowns - 1,311 (1,311) - -
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $ 6,644 $ 7,260 $ (1,311) $ (8,092) $ 4,501
===========================================================================
NOTE 4. Segment Information
The Company has two operating segments: networking and non-networking products.
The networking segment consists of semiconductor devices and related technical
service and support to equipment manufacturers for use in service provider,
enterprise, and storage area networking equipment. The non-networking segment
consists of custom user interface products. The Company is supporting the
non-networking products for existing customers, but has decided not to develop
any further products of this type.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies contained in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K. The Company evaluates performance based on net revenues and
gross profits from operations of the two segments.
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
------------------------------ ------------------------------
Jun 29, Jun 30, Jun 29, Jun 30,
(in thousands) 2003 2002 2003 2002
- ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
Net revenues
Networking $ 59,610 $ 53,885 $ 114,996 $ 100,737
Non-networking 768 626 768 5,216
- ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
Total $ 60,378 $ 54,511 $ 115,764 $ 105,953
============================== ==============================
Gross profit
Networking $ 38,748 $ 33,469 $ 72,249 $ 62,403
Non-networking 329 268 329 2,233
- ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
Total $ 39,077 $ 33,737 $ 72,578 $ 64,636
============================== ==============================
11
NOTE 5. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The components of comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, are as follows:
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
------------------------------- -------------------------------
Jun 29, Jun 30, Jun 29, Jun 30,
(in thousands) 2003 2002 2003 2002
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------
Net loss $ (9,165) $ (11,591) $ (20,680) $ (25,271)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Change in net unrealized gains on investments (2,613) (8,829) (3,871) (22,444)
------------------------------- -------------- --------------
Total $ (11,778) $ (20,420) $ (24,551) $ (47,715)
=============================== ============== ==============
NOTE 6. Net Income (Loss) Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income
loss per share:
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
--------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
Jun 29, Jun 30, Jun 29, Jun 30,
(in thousands, except per share amounts) 2003 2002 2003 2002
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------
Numerator:
Net loss $ (9,165) $ (11,591) $ (20,680) $ (25,271)
======================================= ================== ===================
Denominator:
Basic and diluted weighted average
common shares outstanding (1) 172,289 169,798 171,846 169,656
======================================= ================== ===================
Basic and diluted net loss per share $ (0.05) $ (0.07) $ (0.12) $ (0.15)
======================================= ================== ===================
The Company had approximately 9 million common stock equivalents outstanding at
June 29, 2003 (June 30, 2002 - 5 million) that were not included in diluted net
loss per share because they would be antidilutive.
(1) PMC-Sierra, Ltd. special shares are included in the calculation of basic
weighted average common shares outstanding.
NOTE 7. Voluntary Stock Option Exchange Offer
In August 2002, the Company offered to eligible stock option holders an
opportunity to voluntarily exchange certain stock options outstanding under the
Company's equity-based incentive plans. Under the program, participants were
able to tender for cancellation stock options granted within a specified period
with exercise prices at or above $8.00 per share, in exchange for new options to
be granted at least six months and one day after the cancellation of the
tendered options. Pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the
Company's offer, each eligible participant received new options to purchase an
equivalent number of PMC shares for each tendered option with an exercise price
of less than $60.00. For each tendered option with an exercise price of $60.00
or more, each eligible participant received a new option to purchase a number of
PMC shares equal to one share for each four unexercised shares subject to the
tendered option.
12
On September 26, 2002, the Company cancelled options to purchase approximately
19.3 million shares of common stock with a weighted average exercise price of
$35.98. In exchange for these stock options and pursuant to the terms and
conditions set forth in the Company's offer, the Company granted options to
purchase approximately 16.6 million shares of common stock on March 31, 2003
with an exercise price of $5.95, which was the closing price of the Company's
stock on the grant date.
NOTE 8. Subsequent Event
Subsequent to June 29, 2003, the Company paid approximately $102 million to
settle a long-term lease obligation at a Santa Clara, Ca. office facility. The
cost of settling this and certain other facility leases was accrued as part of
the restructuring charge recorded in the fourth quarter of 2001. The remaining
lease termination negotiations are expected to conclude in the third quarter of
2003.
13
Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties. We use words such as "anticipates", "believes", "plans",
"expects", "future", "intends", "may", "will", "should", "estimates",
"predicts", "potential", "continue", "becoming", "transitioning" and similar
expressions to identify such forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements apply only as of the date of this Quarterly
Report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise. Our actual results could differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the
risks we face as described under "Factors That You Should Consider Before
Investing in PMC-Sierra" and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. Investors are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which
reflect management's analysis only as of the date hereof. Such forward-looking
statements include statements as to, among others, our business outlook,
revenues, capital resources sufficiency, capital expenditures, restructuring
activities, and expenses.
Results of Operations
Second Quarters of 2003 and 2002
Net Revenues ($000,000)
Second Quarter
--------------------------
2003 2002 Change
Networking products $ 59.6 $ 53.9 11%
Non-networking products 0.8 0.6 33%
--------------------------
Total net revenues $ 60.4 $ 54.5 11%
==========================
Net revenues for the second quarter of 2003 were $60.4 million compared to $54.5
million for the second quarter of 2002. Networking revenues increased $5.7
million and non-networking revenues increased $0.2 million.
Networking revenues increased 11% over the same period a year ago due to
increased unit demand. The increased unit demand resulted from improved demand
for telecommunications equipment that incorporates our products and a decrease
in component supply chain inventories at our customers.
Our non-networking product is a single medical chip near end of life and we have
not developed any new products of this type.
Gross Profit ($000,000)
Second Quarter
--------------------------
2003 2002 Change
Networking products $ 38.7 $ 33.5 16%
Non-networking products 0.3 0.3 -
--------------------------
Total gross profit $ 39.1 $ 33.7 16%
==========================
Percentage of net revenues 65% 62%
14
Total gross profit increased $5.4 million, or 16%, in the second quarter of 2003
compared to the same quarter a year ago.
Networking gross profit for the second quarter of 2003 increased by $5.2 million
from the second quarter of 2002 primarily due to increased unit sales and a
reduction in product material costs.
Networking gross profit as a percentage of networking revenues increased 3
percentage points, from 62% in the second quarter of 2002 to 65% in the second
quarter of 2003. This increase resulted from the following factors:
* fixed manufacturing costs were allocated over a higher volume of
shipments, improving gross profit by approximately 3 percentage points;
* product material costs decreased, improving gross profit by 8
percentage points;
* a greater portion of our sales were from higher volume but lower margin
applications, reducing networking gross profit by approximately 6
percentage points; and
* the average selling price of our high volume products decreased,
reducing gross profit by 2 percentage points.
Research and Development and Marketing, General and Administrative Expenses:
Operating Expenses and Charges ($000,000)
Second Quarter
--------------------------
2003 2002 Change
Research and development $ 32.2 $ 34.4 ( 6%)
Percentage of net revenues 53% 63%
Marketing, general and administrative $ 12.2 $ 16.5 ( 26%)
Percentage of net revenues 20% 30%
Amortization of deferred stock compensation:
Research and development $ (0.1) $ 0.7
Marketing, general and administrative 0.1 0.1
---------------------------
$ 0.0 $ 0.8
---------------------------
Percentage of net revenues 0% 1%
Restructuring costs $ 7.3 $ - 100%
Our research and development, or R&D, expenses were $2.2 million, or 6%, lower
in the second quarter of 2003 compared to the same quarter a year ago due to the
restructuring program implemented in the first quarter of 2003 and ongoing cost
reduction initiatives. Headcount reductions resulting from the first quarter
restructuring program and attrition have decreased our R&D personnel and related
costs by $1.4 million. The $0.8 million decrease in other R&D expenses since the
second quarter of 2002 is attributable to a decrease in depreciation expense as
more property and equipment becomes fully depreciated, partially offset by an
increase in product development costs, namely wafers and photomasks.
15
Our marketing, general and administrative, or MG&A, expenses decreased by $4.3
million, or 26%, in the second quarter of 2003 compared to the same quarter a
year ago. Although we had an increase in net revenues over the second quarter of
2002, sales commissions decreased $0.8 million over the same period due to the
termination of certain distributors and reductions in headcount in our internal
sales organization. The decrease in MG&A personnel related costs of $2.3 million
and other MG&A expenses of $1.2 million over the second quarter of 2002 resulted
from our restructuring and cost reduction programs that have been ongoing since
2001.
Amortization of Deferred Stock Compensation
The non-cash charge for amortization of deferred stock compensation in the
second quarter of 2003 was immaterial compared to a $0.8 million charge in the
second quarter of 2002. This decrease in deferred stock compensation expense is
due to the reversal of the accelerated amortization expense taken in prior
periods for unvested deferred stock compensation of employees terminated as part
of the January 2003 restructuring. This reversal offset regular amortization
expense pertaining to remaining deferred stock compensation.
Restructuring
On January 16, 2003, we implemented a corporate restructuring to reduce
operating expenses. The restructuring plan included the termination of
approximately 175 employees and the closure of four product development centers
in Maryland, Ireland and India. We recorded a $7.3 million charge for lease
terminations costs, workforce reduction and settlement of obligations arising
out of our restructuring plan in the second quarter of 2003, in addition to the
$6.6 million we recorded in the first quarter of this year. We expect to record
total charges of approximately $14 million in connection with this plan. We made
cash payments of $5.9 million in the second quarter, in connection with this
restructuring. As the plan is substantially implemented, we expect to record
only immaterial further restructuring charges in connection with this plan in
the third quarter of 2003 as such liabilities are incurred. As a result of this
restructuring, we expect to save approximately $ 21 million of annual operating
costs.
During the second quarter, we paid out $6.5 million in connection with our
October 2001 restructuring activities. Subsequent to the end of our second
quarter, we settled a long-term lease obligation at a Santa Clara, Ca. office
facility for approximately $102 million. This cost was previously accrued as
part of the October 2001 restructuring provision. The remaining lease
termination negotiations are expected to conclude in the third quarter of 2003.
Interest and other income (expense), net
Net interest and other expense was $0.1 million in the second quarter of 2003
compared to income of $1.3 million in the second quarter of 2002. We generated
net interest expense in the current quarter as our longer term investments
matured and were reinvested in investments yielding less than the fixed interest
expense on our convertible notes.
16
Gain on investments
In the second quarter of 2003, the $2.0 million gain on investments was
comprised of a $5.5 million gain on sale of our remaining investment in Sierra
Wireless, Inc., a public company, and a $3.5 million charge for the impairment
of our investments in non-public companies.
Provision for income taxes
We recorded a tax recovery of $41.5 million in the second quarter of 2003
relating to losses and tax credits generated in Canada, which will result in a
recovery of taxes paid in prior periods. We have provided a valuation allowance
on other deferred tax assets generated in the quarter because of uncertainty
regarding their realization.
First Six Months of 2003 and 2002
Net Revenues ($000,000)
First Six Months
----------------------------
2003 2002 Change
Networking products $ 115.0 $ 100.7 14%
Non-networking products 0.8 5.2 ( 85%)
----------------------------
Total net revenues $ 115.8 $ 105.9 9%
============================
Net revenues increased by 9% in the first six months of 2003 compared to the
same period a year ago.
Networking revenues increased 14% over the same period a year ago due to
increased unit demand. The increased unit demand resulted from improved demand,
particularly in Asia, for telecommunications equipment that incorporates our
networking equipment and a decrease in component supply chain inventories.
Non-networking revenues declined 85% in the first six months of 2003 compared to
the first six months of 2002 due to decreased unit sales to our principal
customer in this segment as this product has reached the end of its life. Future
revenues from non-networking products are expected to be immaterial.
17
Gross Profit ($000,000)
First Six Months
-----------------------------
2003 2002 Change
Networking products $ 72.2 $ 62.4 16%
Non-networking products 0.3 2.2 ( 85%)
-----------------------------
Total gross profit $ 72.6 $ 64.6 12%
Percentage of net revenues 63% 61%
Total gross profit increased $8.0 million, or 12%, in the first six months of
2003 compared to the same period a year ago.
Networking gross profit for the first six months of 2003 increased by $9.8
million from the first six months of 2002.
Networking gross profit as a percentage of networking revenues increased 1
percentage point from 62% in the first six months of 2002 to 63% in the first
six months of 2003. This increase resulted from the following factors:
* fixed manufacturing costs were allocated over a higher volume of
shipments, improving gross profit by approximately 3 percentage points;
* product material costs decreased, improving gross profit by 7
percentage points;
* a greater portion of our sales from higher volume but lower margin
applications, reducing networking gross profit by approximately 6
percentage points; and
* the average selling price of our high volume products decreased,
reducing gross profit by 3 percentage points.
Non-networking gross profit for the first six months of 2003 decreased by $1.9
million from the first six months of 2002 due to a reduction in sales volume.
18
Operating Expenses and Charges ($000,000)
First Six Months
--------------------------
2003 2002 Change
Research and development $ 63.1 $ 70.7 ( 11%)
Percentage of net revenues 55% 67%
Marketing, general and administrative $ 24.8 $ 33.6 ( 26%)
Percentage of net revenues 21% 32%
Amortization of deferred stock compensation:
Research and development $ 0.3 $ 1.7
Marketing, general and administrative 0.1 0.1
--------------------------
Total $ 0.4 $ 1.8 ( 76%)
--------------------------
Percentage of net revenues 0% 2%
Restructuring costs $ 13.9 $ - 100%
Research and Development and Marketing, General and Administrative
Expenses:
Our research and development, or R&D, expenses decreased by $7.6 million, or
11%, in the first six months of 2003 compared to the same period a year ago due
to the restructuring and cost reduction programs implemented in 2001 and January
2003. As a result of these restructuring and cost reduction initiatives, we
reduced our R&D personnel and related costs by $2.5 million and other R&D
expenses by $5.1 million compared to the first six months of 2002.
Our marketing, general and administrative, or MG&A, expenses decreased by $8.8
million, or 26%, in the first six months of 2003 compared to the same period a
year ago. Of this decrease, $1.1 million was attributable to lower sales
commissions due to reduced use of external sales representatives and a reduction
in our internal sales force. The remainder was attributable to the restructuring
and cost reduction programs implemented in 2003 and 2001, which reduced our MG&A
personnel and related costs by $4.1 million and other MG&A expenses by $3.6
million compared to the first six months of 2002.
Amortization of Deferred Stock Compensation
We recorded a non-cash charge of $0.4 million for amortization of deferred stock
compensation in the first half of 2003 compared to a $1.8 million charge in the
same period a year ago. The decline is due to the reversal of accelerated
amortization expense taken in prior periods for unvested stock compensation for
employees terminated as part of the January 2003 restructuring.
Restructuring
On January 16, 2003, due to the prolonged economic downturn that has affected
the semiconductor industry, we implemented a corporate restructuring to reduce
operating expenses. The restructuring plan included the termination of
approximately 175 employees and the closure of four product development centers
in Maryland, Ireland and India. To date, we have recorded charges of $13.9
million in conjunction with this plan, including $7.2 million for workforce
reduction, $4.3 million for lease exit and contract settlement costs, $1.3
million for asset write downs and $1.1 million to settle obligations in
connection with the closure of development sites. We expect to incur total costs
of approximately $14 million in connection with this plan. We made cash payments
of $8.1 million in the first six months of 2003 in connection with this
restructuring. As the plan is substantially implemented, we expect to record
only immaterial further restructuring charges in connection with this plan in
the third quarter of 2003 as such liabilities are incurred. As a result of this
restructuring, we epxect to save approximately $ 21 million of annual operating
costs.
19
During the first six months of 2003, we paid out $13.1 million in connection
with our October 2001 restructuring activities. We did not have any changes in
estimates relating to our 2001 restructuring activities that affected the
Statements of Operations.
Interest and other income, net
Net interest and other income was $0.4 million in the first six months of 2003
compared to income of $2.8 million in the second quarter of 2002. The decrease
in interest income resulted from holding lower cash and investment balances than
in the first half of 2002 and due to our longer term investments maturing and
being reinvested in investments yielding less than the fixed interest expense on
our convertible notes.
Net gain on investments
We had a net gain of $2.5 million from investments in the first six months of
2003 compared to $3.1 million 2002. In 2003, we sold our remaining investment in
Sierra Wireless Inc., a public company, resulting in a gain of $6.0 million that
was partially offset by a $3.5 million charge for the impairment of a portion of
our investment in non-public companies. In the first six months of 2002, we
realized $3.1 million gain on sale of our investment in Sierra Wireless and one
other public company.
Provision for income taxes
We recorded a tax recovery of $6.0 million in the first six months of 2003
relating to losses and tax credits generated in Canada, which will result in a
recovery of taxes paid in prior periods. We have provided a valuation allowance
on other deferred tax assets generated in the quarter because of uncertainty
regarding their realization.
20
Critical Accounting Estimates
General
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations is based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect our reported assets, liabilities, revenue
and expenses, and related disclosure of our contingent assets and liabilities.
Our significant accounting policies are outlined in Note 1 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 29, 2002, which also provides commentary on our most critical
accounting estimates. The following estimates were of note during the first
six months of 2003.
Restructuring charges - Facilities
In calculating the cost to dispose of our excess facilities, we had to estimate
for each location the amount to be paid in lease termination payments, the
future lease and operating costs to be paid until the lease is terminated, and
the amount, if any, of sublease revenues. This required us to estimate the
timing and costs of each lease to be terminated, the amount of operating costs
for the affected facilities, and the timing and rate at which we might be able
to sublease or complete negotiations of a lease termination agreement for each
site. To form our estimates for these costs we performed an assessment of the
affected facilities and considered the current market conditions for each site.
During 2001, we recorded total charges of $155 million for the restructuring of
excess facilities as part of restructuring plans, which was approximately 53% of
the estimated total future operating cost and lease obligation for those sites.
As of June 29, 2003, the remaining restructuring accrual for facilities is 51%
of the estimated total future operating costs and lease obligations for those
sites.
Subsequent to June 29, 2003, we announced the completion of a transaction that
resulted in the elimination of our lease obligation related to the Mission
Towers Two, one of the facilities included in the October 2001 restructuring,
for a net cost of approximately $102 million. The final settlement costs of
terminating Mission Towers Two and remaining facility leases related to the 2001
plan are expected to be slightly less than the initial estimates accrued in
2001.
21
In the first quarter of 2003, we announced a further restructuring of our
operations, which resulted in the closing of an additional four product
development sites. In the second quarter, we recorded our estimate of the costs
associated with closing of the remaining three sites, after closing one site in
the first quarter of 2003. Our current estimate of costs for the closing of all
four sites represents just over 55% of the estimated total future operating
costs and lease obligations for the effected sites.
We believe our estimates of the obligations for the closing of sites remain
sufficient to cover anticipated settlement costs. However, our assumptions on
either the lease termination payments, operating costs until terminated, or the
amounts and timing of offsetting sublease revenues may turn out to be incorrect
and our actual cost may be materially different from our estimates. If our
actual costs exceed our estimates, we would incur additional expenses, which
would increase our losses.
Business Outlook
Forecasting our revenue outlook in the current slow economic climate is
difficult. Currently many of our customers wait until the last possible moment
before ordering products, and then limit their order to an amount that is the
minimum required to produce equipment to meet specific customer demand. Our
quarterly revenues may continue to vary considerably as our customers adjust to
fluctuating demand for products in their markets.
We anticipate that our third quarter 2003 revenues will remain approximately $60
million. Our estimate regarding third quarter revenues is based on orders
already shipped at the date of this report, order backlog scheduled for shipment
during the remainder of the quarter, and an estimate of new orders we expect to
receive and ship before the end of the quarter (turns orders). We have estimated
turns orders for the third quarter at a lower level than what we experienced in
the first two quarters of 2003 to reflect: variability in our customers' own
market outlook encountered during the third calendar quarter of the two prior
fiscal years; related variability in customer order booking patterns experienced
during these same periods; and recent historic flat aggregate end market demand
trends for our customers' products which include our components. If turns orders
through the third quarter are consistent with the levels of the first two
quarters of fiscal 2003, our revenue may grow when compared to the June 2003
quarter.
We expect aggregate spending on research and development (R&D) and marketing,
general and administrative (MG&A) expenses to decrease approximately 5% in the
third quarter from the spending levels of the second quarter, as we realize the
full effect of the restructuring program we implemented on January 16, 2003.
We have implemented the majority of our restructuring program announced in
January of 2003. We anticipate recording only non-material amounts related to
the January 2003 restructuring in the third quarter.
We expect our interest costs to exceed the interest income on our cash balances
by $0.5 million as the yields we earn on our cash, short-term investments and
long-term investments in bonds and notes continue to decline, while the interest
rate associated with our convertible subordinated debt, the largest component of
interest expense, is fixed.
22
Liquidity & Capital Resources
Our principal source of liquidity at June 29, 2003 was $563.4 million in cash
and investments, which included $478.6 million in cash and cash equivalents,
short-term investments and restricted cash and $84.8 million of long-term
investments in bonds and notes, which mature within the next 12 to 30 months.
In the first six months of 2003, we used $27.2 million of cash for operating
activities. Our investment activities included cash proceeds of $8.4 million
from the sale of a portion of our investment portfolio, $8.1 million in wafer
fabrication deposit refunds, and $2.3 million we used for purchases of property
and equipment. In addition, we generated $11.7 million through the issuance of
common stock under our equity-based compensation plans.
As of June 29, 2003, we have cash commitments made up of the following:
As at June 29, 2003 (in thousands)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
After
Contractual Obligations Total 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2007
Operating Lease Obligations:
Minimum Rental Payments $ 253,081 $ 15,551 $ 30,573 $ 29,776 $ 29,026 $ 29,303 $ 118,852
Estimated Operating Cost Payments 57,021 3,870 7,305 7,228 6,670 6,446 25,503
Long Term Debt:
Principal Repayment 275,000 - - - 275,000 - -
Interest Payments 36,095 5,156 10,313 10,313 10,313 - -
Purchase Obligations 4,412 3,035 1,377 - - - -
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
625,609 $ 27,612 $ 49,568 $ 47,317 $ 321,009 $ 35,749 $ 144,354
=====================================================================
Venture Investment Commitments (see below) 21,719
-------------
Total Contractual Cash Obligations $ 647,328
=============
Subsequent to the end of the second quarter of 2003, we settled a long-term
lease obligation at a Santa Clara, Ca. office facility for which we had future
rent and estimated operating costs included in the above table of approximately
$215 million. The lease was settled through a payment of approximately $102
million in the third quarter of 2003. Subsequent to the end of the second
quarter of 2003, we entered into additional purchase obligations related to
development tools for $3.2 million, $4.8 million and $2.4 million for the years
2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively.
We participate in four professionally managed venture funds that invest in
early-stage private technology companies. From time to time these funds request
additional capital for private placements. We have committed to invest an
additional $21.7 million into these funds, which may be requested by the fund
managers at any time over the next seven years.
We have a line of credit with a bank that allows us to borrow up to $5.3 million
provided we maintain eligible investments with the bank equal to the amount
drawn on the line of credit. At June 29, 2003 we had committed all of this
facility under letters of credit as security for office leases. Subsequent to
the end of our second quarter, the bank released $2.75 million in restricted
cash in connection with the extinguishment of a letter of credit relating to the
settled Santa Clara office facility lease.
We are committed to semi-annual interest payments of approximately $5.2 million
to holders of our convertible notes. These interest payments are due on February
15 and August 15 of each year, with the last payment of interest and $275
million in principal being due on August 15, 2006.
23
We believe that existing sources of liquidity will satisfy our restructuring
obligations and our projected operating, working capital, venture investing,
debt interest, capital expenditure and wafer deposit requirements through the
end of 2003. We expect to spend $6.1 million on new capital additions during the
remainder of 2003.
Recently issued accounting standards
In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement
No. 150 (SFAS No. 150), "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equities". SFAS 150 requires certain
financial instruments that were accounted for as equity under previous guidance
to now be accounted for as liability. SFAS No. 150 applies to mandatorily
redeemable stock and certain financial instruments that require or may require
settlement by transferring cash or other assets. SFAS No. 150 is effective for
financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise
is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June
15, 2003. We have not issued any financial instruments that fall under the scope
of SFAS No. 150 and do not expect that the adoption of this Statement will have
a material impact on our results of operations and financial position.
In April 2003, SFAS No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities," was issued. In general, this statement
amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments, including certain
derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities
under SFAS No. 133. This statement is effective for contracts entered into or
modified after June 30, 2003, and for hedging relationships designated after
June 30, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 149 is not expected to have a material
impact on our consolidated financial position or disclosures.
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), "Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities", an Interpretation of ARB No. 51. FIN 46 requires
certain variable interest entities to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary
of the entity if the equity investors in the entity do not have the
characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient
equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional
subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46 is effective for all
new variable interest entities created or acquired after January 31, 2003. For
variable interest entities created or acquired prior to February 1, 2003, the
provisions of FIN 46 must be applied for the first interim or annual period
beginning after June 15, 2003. We do not expect that the adoption of FIN 46 will
have a material effect on our results of operations, financial condition or
disclosures.
FACTORS THAT YOU SHOULD CONSIDER BEFORE INVESTING IN PMC-SIERRA
Our company is subject to a number of risks - some are normal to the fabless
networking semiconductor industry, some are the same or similar to those
disclosed in previous SEC filings, and some may be present in the future. You
should carefully consider all of these risks and the other information in this
report before investing in PMC. The fact that certain risks are endemic to the
industry does not lessen the significance of the risk.
24
As a result of these risks, our business, financial condition or operating
results could be materially adversely affected. This could cause the trading
price of our securities to decline, and you may lose part or all of your
investment.
We are subject to rapid changes in demand for our products due to customer
inventory levels, production schedules, fluctuations in demand for networking
equipment and our customer concentration.
As a result of these factors, we have very limited revenue visibility and the
rate by which revenues are booked and shipped within the same reporting period
is typically volatile. In addition, our net bookings can vary sharply up and
down within a quarter.
Our revenues may decline as our customers face unpredictable and
volatile demand for their products.
Our customers have reported that demand for their products remains weak and may
fluctuate from current levels depending on their customers' specific needs.
Several of our customers' clients carefully manage their cash usage and expense
levels, purchasing equipment which may generate a financial return on a shorter
time horizon. The equipment to which our customers' clients shift may not
incorporate, or may incorporate fewer, of our products.
In response to the actual and anticipated declines in networking equipment
demand, many of our customers and their contract manufacturers have undertaken
initiatives to significantly reduce expenditures and excess component
inventories. Many platforms in which our products are designed have been
cancelled as our customers cancel or restructure product development initiatives
or as venture-financed startup companies fail. Our revenues may be materially
and adversely impacted in future quarters if these conditions continue or
worsen.
Our customers' actions have reduced our visibility of future revenue streams. As
most of our costs are fixed in the short term, a further reduction in demand for
our products may cause a decline in our gross and net margins.
While we believe that our customers and their contract manufacturers are
consuming a portion of their inventory of PMC products, we believe that our
revenues will continue to be affected by: variability in flat aggregate end
market demand trends for our customers' products which include our components as
well as seasonal variability in customer order patterns similar to those
experienced in the third calendar quarter of the prior two fiscal years (see
"Business Outlook" above). We cannot accurately predict when demand for our
products will strengthen or how quickly our customers will consume their
inventories of our products.
We may fail to meet our demand forecasts if our customers cancel or
delay the purchase of our products.
Many of our customers have numerous product lines, numerous component
requirements for each product, sizeable and complex supplier structures, and
often engage contract manufacturers for additional manufacturing capacity. This
makes forecasting their production requirements difficult and can lead to an
inventory surplus of certain of their components.
25
Our customers often shift buying patterns as they manage inventory levels,
decide to use competing products, are acquired or divested, market different
products, or change production schedules. Customers are more frequently
requesting shipment of our products at less than our normal lead times. We may
be unable to deliver products to customers when they require them if we
incorrectly estimate future demand, and this may lead to higher fluctuations in
shipments of our products.
In addition, we believe that uncertainty in our customers' end markets and our
customers' increased focus on cash management has caused our customers to delay
product orders and reduce delivery lead-time expectations. We expect this will
increase the proportion of our revenues in future periods that will be from
orders placed and fulfilled within the same period. This will decrease our
ability to accurately forecast and may lead to greater fluctuations in operating
results.
We rely on a few customers for a major portion of our sales, any one of
which could materially impact our revenues should they change their
ordering pattern.
We depend on a limited number of customers for a major portion of our revenues.
Through direct, distributor and subcontractor purchases, Cisco Systems and
Hewlett Packard each accounted for more than 10% of our second quarter 2003
revenues. We do not have long-term volume purchase commitments from any of our
major customers. Accordingly, our future operating results will continue to
depend on the success of our largest customers and on our ability to sell
existing and new products to these customers in significant quantities.
The loss of a key customer, or a reduction in our sales to any key customer or
our inability to attract new significant customers could materially and
adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
If demand for our products declines, we may have to add to our
inventory reserve, which would lead to a further decline in our
operating profits.
We have a reserve against excess inventory based on our revenue expectations
through the next four quarters. If future demand for our products does not meet
our expectations, we may need to take an additional write-down of inventory.
We anticipate lower margins on high volume products, which could adversely
affect our profitability.
We expect the average selling prices of our products to decline as they mature.
Historically, competition in the semiconductor industry has driven down the
average selling prices of products. If we price our products too high, our
customers may use a competitor's product or an in-house solution. To maintain
profit margins, we must reduce our costs sufficiently to offset declines in
average selling prices, or successfully sell proportionately more new products
with higher average selling prices. Yield or other production problems, or
shortages of supply may preclude us from lowering or maintaining current
operating costs.
OEMs are becoming more price conscious than in the past as a result of the
industry downturn, and as semiconductors sourced from third party suppliers
comprise a greater portion of the total materials cost in OEM equipment. We have
also experienced more aggressive price competition from competitors that wish to
enter into the market segments in which we participate. These circumstances may
make some of our products less competitive and we may be forced to decrease our
prices significantly to win a design. We may lose design opportunities or may
experience overall declines in gross margins as a result of increased price
competition.
26
In addition, our networking products range widely in terms of the margins they
generate. A change in product sales mix could impact our operating results
materially.
Design wins do not translate into near-term revenues and the timing of revenues
from newly designed products is often uncertain.
We have announced a number of new products and design wins for existing and new
products. While some industry analysts may use design wins as a metric for
future revenues, many design wins do not generate revenues, as customer projects
are cancelled or are not adopted by their end customers. In the event a design
win generates revenue, the amount of revenue will vary greatly from one design
win to another. Most revenue-generating design wins take greater than two years
to generate meaningful revenue.
Our revenue expectations may include growing sales of newer semiconductors based
on early adoption of those products by customers. These expectations would not
be achieved if early sales of new system level products by our customers do not
increase over time. We may experience this more with design wins from early
stage companies, who tend to focus on leading-edge technologies that may be
adopted less rapidly in the current environment by telecommunications service
providers.
Our restructurings have curtailed our resources and may have insufficiently
addressed market conditions.
On January 16th, 2003, we implemented plans to restructure our operations
through a workforce reduction of approximately 175 employees and the shutdown of
four of our product development sites. We recorded a charge of $13.9 million in
the first six months of 2003. While we expect to record only immaterial further
costs in the third quarter of 2003, actual costs may exceed our estimates.
We reduced the work force and consolidated or closed excess facilities in an
effort to bring our expenses into line with our reduced revenue expectations.
However, if our revenues do not increase, we expect to continue to incur net
losses.
While management uses all available information to estimate these restructuring
costs, particularly facilities costs, our estimates may prove to be inadequate.
If our actual sublease revenues or exiting negotiations differ from our original
assumptions, we may have to record additional charges, which could materially
affect our results of operations, financial position and cash flow.
Restructuring plans require significant management resources to execute and we
may fail to achieve our targeted goals and our expected annualized savings. We
may have incorrectly anticipated the demand for our products, we may be forced
to restructure further or may incur further operating charges due to poor
business conditions and some of our product development initiatives may be
delayed due to the reduction in our development resources.
27
Our revenues may decline if we do not maintain a competitive portfolio of
products.
We are experiencing significantly greater competition from many different market
participants as the market in which we participate matures. In addition, we are
expanding into markets, such as the wireless infrastructure and generic
microprocessor markets, which have established incumbents with substantial
financial and technological resources. We expect fiercer competition than that
which we have traditionally faced as some of these incumbents derive a majority
of their earnings from these markets.
All of our competitors pose the following threats to us:
As our customers design next generation systems and select the chips
for those new systems, our competitors have an opportunity to convince
our customers to use their products, which may cause our revenues to
decline.
We typically face competition at the design stage, where customers evaluate
alternative design approaches requiring integrated circuits. Our competitors may
have more opportunities to supplant our products in next generation systems
because of the shortening product life and design-in cycles in many of our
customers' products.
In addition, as a result of the industry downturn, and as semiconductors sourced
from third party suppliers comprise a greater portion of the total materials
cost in OEM equipment, OEMs are becoming more price conscious than in the past.
We have also experienced increased price aggressiveness from some competitors
that wish to enter into the market segments in which we participate. These
circumstances may make some of our products price-uncompetitive or force us to
match low prices. We may lose design opportunities or may experience overall
declines in gross margins as a result of increased price competition.
We are facing additional competition from companies who have excess capacity and
who are able to offer our OEM customers similar products to ours. Excess
capacity, in tandem with the significant decrease in demand for OEM equipment,
has created downward pricing pressure on our products.
The markets for our products are intensely competitive and subject to rapid
technological advancement in design tools, wafer manufacturing techniques,
process tools and alternate networking technologies. We may not be able to
develop new products at competitive pricing and performance levels. Even if we
are able to do so, we may not complete a new product and introduce it to market
in a timely manner. Our customers may substitute use of our products in their
next generation equipment with those of current or future competitors.
Increasing competition in our industry will make it more difficult to
achieve design wins.
We face significant competition from three major fronts. First, we compete
against established peer-group semiconductor companies that focus on the
communications semiconductor business. These companies include Agere Systems,
Applied Micro Circuits Corporation, Broadcom, Exar Corporation, Conexant
Systems, Marvell Technology Group, Multilink Technology Corporation, Silicon
Image, Transwitch and Vitesse Semiconductor. These companies are well financed,
have significant communications semiconductor technology assets, have
established sales channels, and are dependent on the market in which we
participate for the bulk of their revenues.
28
Other competitors include major domestic and international semiconductor
companies, such as Agilent, Cypress Semiconductor, Intel, IBM, Infineon,
Integrated Device Technology, Maxim Integrated Products, Motorola, Nortel
Networks, and Texas Instruments. These companies are concentrating an increasing
amount of their substantial financial and other resources on the markets in
which we participate. This represents a serious competitive threat to us.
Emerging venture-backed companies also provide significant competition in our
segment of the semiconductor market. These companies tend to focus on specific
portions of our broad range of products and in the aggregate, represent a
significant threat to our product lines. In addition, these companies could
introduce disruptive technologies that may make our technologies and products
obsolete.
Over the next few years, we expect additional competitors, some of which may
also have greater financial and other resources, to enter the market with new
products. These companies, individually or collectively, could represent future
competition for many design wins, and subsequent product sales.
We must often redesign our products to meet evolving industry standards
and customer specifications, which may prevent or delay future revenue
growth.
We sell products to a market whose characteristics include evolving industry
standards, product obsolescence, and new manufacturing and design technologies.
Many of the standards and protocols for our products are based on high-speed
networking technologies that have not been widely adopted or ratified by one or
more of the standard-setting bodies in our customers' industry. Our customers
often delay or alter their design demands during this standard-setting process.
In response, we must redesign our products to suit these changing demands.
Redesign usually delays the production of our products. Our products may become
obsolete during these delays.
Since many of the products we develop do not reach full production
sales volumes for a number of years, we may incorrectly anticipate
market demand and develop products that achieve little or no market
acceptance.
Our products generally take between 18 and 24 months from initial
conceptualization to development of a viable prototype, and another 6 to 18
months to be designed into our customers' equipment and into production. Our
products often must be redesigned because manufacturing yields on prototypes are
unacceptable or customers redefine their products to meet changing industry
standards or customer specifications. As a result, we develop products many
years before volume production and may inaccurately anticipate our customers'
needs.
Our strategy includes broadening our business into the Enterprise, Storage and
Consumer markets. We may not be successful in achieving significant sales in
these new markets.
The Enterprise, Storage and Consumer markets are already serviced by incumbent
suppliers who have established relationships with customers. We may be
unsuccessful in displacing these suppliers, or having our products designed into
products for different market needs. In order to compete against incumbents, we
may need to lower our prices to win new business, which could lower our gross
margin. We may incur increased research, development and sales costs to address
these new markets.
29
If foreign exchange rates fluctuate significantly, our profitability may
decline.
We are exposed to foreign currency rate fluctuations because a significant part
of our development, test, marketing and administrative costs are denominated in
Canadian dollars, and our selling costs are denominated in a variety of
currencies around the world. The US dollar has and may continue to devalue
compared to the Canadian dollar. To protect against reductions in value and the
volatility of future cash flows caused by changes in foreign exchange rates, we
enter into foreign currency forward contracts. The contracts reduce, but do not
always entirely eliminate, the impact of foreign currency exchange rate
movements. In addition, this foreign currency risk management policy may not be
effective in addressing long-term fluctuations since our contracts do not extend
beyond a 12-month maturity.
In addition, while all of our sales are denominated in US dollars, our
customers' products are sold worldwide. Any further decline in the world
networking markets could seriously depress our customers' order levels for our
products. This effect could be exacerbated if fluctuations in currency exchange
rates decrease the demand for our customers' products.
We are subject to the risks of conducting business outside the United
States to a greater extent than companies that operate their businesses
mostly in the United States, which may impair our sales, development or
manufacturing of our products.
We are subject to the risks of conducting business outside the United States to
a greater extent than most companies because, in addition to selling our
products in a number of countries, a significant portion of our research and
development and manufacturing is conducted outside the United States.
The geographic diversity of our business operations could hinder our ability to
coordinate design and sales activities. If we are unable to develop systems and
communication processes to support our geographic diversity, we may suffer
product development delays or strained customer relationships.
We may lose our ability to design or produce products, could face
additional unforeseen costs or could lose access to key customers if
any of the nations in which we conduct business impose trade barriers
or new communications standards.
We may have difficulty obtaining export licenses for certain technology produced
for us outside the United States. If a foreign country imposes new taxes,
tariffs, quotas, and other trade barriers and restrictions or the United States
and a foreign country develop hostilities or change diplomatic and trade
relationships, we may not be able to continue manufacturing or sub-assembly of
our products in that country and may have fewer sales in that country. We may
also have fewer sales in a country that imposes new communications standards or
technologies. This could inhibit our ability to meet our customers' demand for
our products and lower our revenues.
30
We are exposed to the credit risk of some of our customers and we may have
difficulty collecting receivables from customers based in foreign countries.
Many of our customers employ contract manufacturers to produce their products
and manage their inventories. Many of these contract manufacturers represent
greater credit risk than our networking equipment customers, who generally do
not guarantee our credit receivables related to their contract manufacturers.
In addition, international debt rating agencies have significantly downgraded
the bond ratings on a number of our larger customers, which had traditionally
been considered financially stable. Should these companies enter into bankruptcy
proceedings or breach their debt covenants, our significant accounts receivables
with these companies could be jeopardized.
The complexity of our products could result in unforeseen delays or expenses and
in undetected defects or bugs, which could adversely affect the market
acceptance of new products and damage our reputation with current or prospective
customers.
Although we, and our customers and our suppliers rigorously test our products,
our highly complex products regularly contain defects or bugs. We have in the
past experienced, and may in the future experience, these defects and bugs. If
any of our products contain defects or bugs, or have reliability, quality or
compatibility problems that are significant to our customers, our reputation may
be damaged and customers may be reluctant to buy our products. This could
materially and adversely affect our ability to retain existing customers or
attract new customers. In addition, these defects or bugs could interrupt or
delay sales to our customers.
We may have to invest significant capital and other resources to alleviate
problems with our products. If any of these problems are not found until after
we have commenced commercial production of a new product, we may be required to
incur additional development costs and product recall, repair or replacement
costs. These problems may also result in claims against us by our customers or
others. In addition, these problems may divert our technical and other resources
from other development efforts. Moreover, we would likely lose, or experience a
delay in, market acceptance of the affected product or products, and we could
lose credibility with our current and prospective customers.
We may be unsuccessful in transitioning the design of our new products to new
manufacturing processes.
Many of our new products are designed to take advantage of new manufacturing
processes offering smaller manufacturing geometries as they become available, as
the smaller geometry products can provide a product with improved features such
as lower power requirements, more functionality and lower cost. We believe that
the transition of our products to smaller geometries is critical for us to
remain competitive. We could experience difficulties in migrating to future
geometries or manufacturing processes, which would result in the delay of the
production of our products. Our products may become obsolete during these
delays, or allow competitors' parts to be chosen by customers during the design
process.
31
Our business strategy contemplates acquisition of other companies or
technologies, which could adversely affect our operating performance.
Acquiring products, technologies or businesses from third parties is part of our
business strategy. Management may be diverted from our operations while they
identify and negotiate these acquisitions and integrate an acquired entity into
our operations. Also, we may be forced to develop expertise outside our existing
businesses, and replace key personnel who leave due to an acquisition.
An acquisition could absorb substantial cash resources, require us to incur or
assume debt obligations, or issue additional equity. If we issue more equity, we
may dilute our common stock with securities that have an equal or a senior
interest.
Acquired entities also may have unknown liabilities, and the combined entity may
not achieve the results that were anticipated at the time of the acquisition.
The timing of revenues from newly designed products is often uncertain. In the
past, we have had to redesign products that we acquired when buying other
businesses, resulting in increased expenses and delayed revenues. This may occur
in the future as we commercialize the new products resulting from acquisitions.
We participate in funds that invest in early-stage private technology companies
to gain access to emerging technologies. These companies possess unproven
technologies and our investments may or may not yield positive returns. We
currently have commitments to invest $21.7 million in such funds. In addition to
consuming significant amounts of cash, these investments are risky because the
technologies that these companies are developing may not reach
commercialization. We may record an impairment charge to our operating results
should we determine that these funds have incurred a non-temporary decline in
value.
The loss of personnel could preclude us from designing new products.
To succeed, we must retain and hire technical personnel highly skilled at the
design and test functions needed to develop high-speed networking products and
related software. We do not have employment agreements in place with many of our
key personnel. As employee incentives, we issue common stock options that
generally have exercise prices at the market value at the time of grant and that
are subject to vesting. The stock options we grant to employees are effective as
retention incentives only if they have economic value.
Our recent restructurings have significantly reduced the number of our technical
employees. We may experience customer dissatisfaction as a result of delayed or
cancelled product development initiatives.
We may not be able to meet customer demand for our products if we do not
accurately predict demand or if we fail to secure adequate wafer fabrication or
assembly capacity.
32
We currently do not have the ability to accurately predict what products our
customers will need in the future. Anticipating demand is difficult because our
customers face volatile pricing and demand for their end-user networking
equipment, our customers are focusing more on cash preservation and tighter
inventory management, and because we supply a large number of products to a
variety of customers and contract manufacturers who have many equipment programs
for which they purchase our products. Our customers are frequently requesting
shipment of our products earlier than our normal lead times. If we do not
accurately predict what mix of products our customers may order, we may not be
able to meet our customers' demand in a timely manner or we may be left with
unwanted inventory.
A shortage in supply could adversely impact our ability to satisfy customer
demand, which could adversely affect our customer relationships along with our
current and future operating results.
We rely on limited sources of wafer fabrication, the loss of which
could delay and limit our product shipments.
We do not own or operate a wafer fabrication facility. Three outside foundries
in Asia supply greater than 90% of our semiconductor device requirements. Our
foundry suppliers also produce products for themselves and other companies. In
addition, we may not have access to adequate capacity or certain process
technologies. We have less control over delivery schedules, manufacturing yields
and costs than competitors with their own fabrication facilities. If the
foundries we use are unable or unwilling to manufacture our products in required
volumes, we may have to identify and qualify acceptable additional or
alternative foundries. This qualification process could take six months or
longer. We may not find sufficient capacity quickly enough, if ever, to satisfy
our production requirements.
Some companies that supply our customers are similarly dependent on a limited
number of suppliers to produce their products. These other companies' products
may be designed into the same networking equipment into which our products are
designed. Our order levels could be reduced materially if these companies are
unable to access sufficient production capacity to produce in volumes demanded
by our customers because our customers may be forced to slow down or halt
production on the equipment into which our products are designed.
We depend on third parties in Asia for assembly of our semiconductor
products that could delay and limit our product shipments.
Sub-assemblers in Asia assemble all of our semiconductor products. Raw material
shortages, political and social instability, assembly house service disruptions,
currency fluctuations, or other circumstances in the region could force us to
seek additional or alternative sources of supply or assembly. This could lead to
supply constraints or product delivery delays that, in turn, may result in the
loss of revenues. We have less control over delivery schedules, assembly
processes, quality assurances and costs than competitors that do not outsource
these tasks.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, may disrupt our wafer fabrication or
assembly manufacturers located in Asia which could adversely impact our ability
to ship orders, reducing our revenues in that quarter
33
We depend on a limited number of design software suppliers, the loss of
which could impede our product development.
A limited number of suppliers provide the computer aided design, or CAD,
software we use to design our products. Factors affecting the price,
availability or technical capability of these products could affect our ability
to access appropriate CAD tools for the development of highly complex products.
In particular, the CAD software industry has been the subject of extensive
intellectual property rights litigation, the results of which could materially
change the pricing and nature of the software we use. We also have limited
control over whether our software suppliers will be able to overcome technical
barriers in time to fulfill our needs.
From time to time, we become defendants in legal proceedings about which we are
unable to assess our exposure and which could become significant liabilities
upon judgment.
We become defendants in legal proceedings from time to time. Companies in our
industry have been subject to claims related to patent infringement and product
liability, as well as contract and personal claims. We may not be able to
accurately assess the risk related to these suits, and we may be unable to
accurately assess our level of exposure. These proceedings may result in
material charges to our operating results in the future if our exposure is
material and if our ability to assess our exposure becomes clearer.
If we cannot protect our proprietary technology, we may not be able to prevent
competitors from copying our technology and selling similar products, which
would harm our revenues.
To compete effectively, we must protect our proprietary information. We rely on
a combination of patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secret laws,
confidentiality procedures and licensing arrangements to protect our
intellectual property rights. We hold several patents and have a number of
pending patent applications.
We might not succeed in attaining patents from any of our pending applications.
Even if we are awarded patents, they may not provide any meaningful protection
or commercial advantage to us, as they may not be of sufficient scope or
strength, or may not be issued in all countries where our products can be sold.
In addition, our competitors may be able to design around our patents.
We develop, manufacture and sell our products in Asian and other countries that
may not protect our products or intellectual property rights to the same extent
as the laws of the United States. This makes piracy of our technology and
products more likely. Steps we take to protect our proprietary information may
not be adequate to prevent theft of our technology. We may not be able to
prevent our competitors from independently developing technologies that are
similar to or better than ours.
Our products employ technology that may infringe on the proprietary rights of
third parties, which may expose us to litigation and prevent us from selling our
products.
34
Vigorous protection and pursuit of intellectual property rights or positions
characterize the semiconductor industry. This often results in expensive and
lengthy litigation. We, and our customers or suppliers, may be accused of
infringing on patents or other intellectual property rights owned by third
parties. This has happened in the past. An adverse result in any litigation
could force us to pay substantial damages, stop manufacturing, using and selling
the infringing products, spend significant resources to develop non-infringing
technology, discontinue using certain processes or obtain licenses to the
infringing technology. In addition, we may not be able to develop non-infringing
technology, nor might we be able to find appropriate licenses on reasonable
terms.
Patent disputes in the semiconductor industry are often settled through
cross-licensing arrangements. Because we currently do not have a substantial
portfolio of patents compared to our larger competitors, we may not be able to
settle an alleged patent infringement claim through a cross-licensing
arrangement. We are therefore more exposed to third party claims than some of
our larger competitors and customers.
In the past, our customers have been required to obtain licenses from and pay
royalties to third parties for the sale of systems incorporating our
semiconductor devices. Customers may also make claims against us with respect to
infringement.
Furthermore, we may initiate claims or litigation against third parties for
infringing our proprietary rights or to establish the validity of our
proprietary rights. This could consume significant resources and divert the
efforts of our technical and management personnel, regardless of the
litigation's outcome.
We have significantly increased our debt level as a result of the sale of
convertible subordinated notes.
On August 6, 2001, we raised $275 million through the issuance of convertible
subordinated notes. As a result, our interest payment obligations have increased
substantially. The degree to which we are leveraged could materially and
adversely affect our ability to obtain financing for working capital,
acquisitions or other purposes and could make us more vulnerable to industry
downturns and competitive pressures. Our ability to meet our debt service
obligations will be dependent upon our future performance, which will be subject
to financial, business and other factors affecting our operations, many of which
are beyond our control. On August 15, 2006, we are obliged to repay the full
remaining principal amount of the notes that have not been converted into our
common stock.
Securities we issue to fund our operations could dilute your ownership.
We may decide to raise additional funds through public or private debt or equity
financing to fund our operations. If we raise funds by issuing equity
securities, the percentage ownership of current stockholders will be reduced and
the new equity securities may have priority rights to your investment. We may
not obtain sufficient financing on terms that are favorable to you or us. We may
delay, limit or eliminate some or all of our proposed operations if adequate
funds are not available.
35
Our stock price has been and may continue to be volatile.
In the past, our common stock price has fluctuated significantly. In particular,
our stock price declined significantly in the context of announcements made by
us and other semiconductor suppliers of reduced revenue expectations and of a
general slowdown in the markets we serve. Given these general economic
conditions and the reduced demand for our products that we have experienced, we
expect that our stock price will continue to be volatile.
In addition, fluctuations in our stock price and our price-to-earnings multiple
may have made our stock attractive to momentum, hedge or day-trading investors
who often shift funds into and out of stocks rapidly, exacerbating price
fluctuations in either direction particularly when viewed on a quarterly basis.
Securities class action litigation has often been instituted against a company
following periods of volatility and decline in the market price of their
securities. If instituted against us, regardless of the outcome, such litigation
could result in substantial costs and diversion of our management's attention
and resources and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and operating results. We could be required to pay substantial
damages, including punitive damages, if we were to lose such a lawsuit.
Provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law and our adoption of a
stockholder rights plan may delay or prevent acquisition of us, which could
decrease the value of our common stock.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions
that could make it harder for a third party to acquire us without the consent of
our board of directors. Delaware law also imposes some restrictions on mergers
and other business combinations between us and any holder of 15% or more of our
outstanding common stock. In addition, our board of directors has the right to
issue preferred stock without stockholder approval, which could be used to
dilute the stock ownership of a potential hostile acquirer. Although we believe
these provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware law
and our stockholder rights plan will provide for an opportunity to receive a
higher bid by requiring potential acquirers to negotiate with our board of
directors, these provisions apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial
by some stockholders.
Our board of directors adopted a stockholder rights plan, pursuant to which we
declared and paid a dividend of one right for each share of common stock held by
stockholders of record as of May 25, 2001. Unless redeemed by us prior to the
time the rights are exercised, upon the occurrence of certain events, the rights
will entitle the holders to receive upon exercise thereof shares of our
preferred stock, or shares of an acquiring entity, having a value equal to twice
the then-current exercise price of the right. The issuance of the rights could
have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of us.
36
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The following discussion regarding our risk management activities contains
"forward-looking statements" that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual
results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking
statements.
Cash Equivalents, Short-term Investments and Investments in Bonds and
Notes:
We regularly maintain a short and long term investment portfolio of various
types of government and corporate bonds and notes. Our investments are made in
accordance with an investment policy approved by our Board of Directors.
Maturities of these instruments are less than 30 months with the majority being
within one year. To minimize credit risk, we diversify our investments and
select minimum ratings of P-1 or A by Moody's, or A-1 or A by Standard and
Poor's, or equivalent.
We classify these securities as held-to-maturity or available-for-sale depending
on our investment intention. Held-to-maturity investments are held at amortized
cost, while available-for-sale investments are held at fair market value.
Available-for-sale securities represented less than 2% of our investment
portfolio as of June 29, 2003.
Investments in both fixed rate and floating rate interest earning instruments
carry a degree of interest rate and credit rating risk. Fixed rate securities
may have their fair market value adversely impacted because of a rise in
interest rates, while floating rate securities may produce less income than
expected if interest rates fall. In addition, the value of all types of
securities may be impaired if bond rating agencies decrease the credit ratings
of the entities which issue those securities. Due in part to these factors, our
future investment income may fall short of expectations because of changes in
interest rates, or we may suffer losses in principal if we were to sell
securities that have declined in market value because of changes in interest
rates or a decrease in credit ratings.
We do not attempt to reduce or eliminate our exposure to changes in interest
rates or credit ratings through the use of derivative financial instruments.
Based on a sensitivity analysis performed on the financial instruments held at
June 29, 2003 that are sensitive to changes in interest rates, the impact to the
fair value of our investment portfolio by an immediate hypothetical parallel
shift in the yield curve of plus or minus 50, 100 or 150 basis points would
result in a decline or increase in portfolio value of approximately $1.4
million, $2.8 million and $4.2 million respectively.
Other Investments:
Our other investments also include numerous strategic investments in privately
held companies or venture funds that are carried on our balance sheet at cost,
net of write-downs for non-temporary declines in market value. We expect to make
additional investments like these in the future. These investments are
inherently risky, as they typically are comprised of investments in companies
and partnerships that are still in the start-up or development stages. The
market for the technologies or products that they have under development is
typically in the early stages, and may never materialize. We could lose our
entire investment in these companies and partnerships or may incur an additional
expense if we determine that the value of these assets have been impaired.
37
Foreign Currency
Our sales and corresponding receivables are made primarily in United States
dollars. We generate a significant portion of our revenues from sales to
customers located outside the United States including Canada, Europe, the Middle
East and Asia. We are subject to risks typical of an international business
including, but not limited to, differing economic conditions, changes in
political climate, differing tax structures, other regulations and restrictions
and foreign exchange rate volatility. Accordingly, our future results could be
materially adversely affected by changes in these or other factors.
Through our operations in Canada and elsewhere outside the United States, we
incur research and development, customer support costs and administrative
expenses in Canadian and other foreign currencies. We are exposed, in the normal
course of business, to foreign currency risks on these expenditures. In our
effort to manage such risks, we have adopted a foreign currency risk management
policy intended to reduce the effects of potential short-term fluctuations on
our operating results stemming from our exposure to these risks. As part of this
risk management, we enter into foreign exchange forward contracts on behalf of
our foreign subsidiaries. These forward contracts offset the impact of U.S.
dollar currency fluctuations on forecasted cash flows or firm commitments. We
limit the forward contracts operational period to 12 months or less and we do
not enter into foreign exchange forward contracts for trading purposes. Because
we do not engage in foreign exchange risk management techniques beyond these
periods, our cost structure is subject to long-term changes in foreign exchange
rates.
As at June 29, 2003, we had one outstanding foreign exchange contract with an
immaterial fair value and a 10% shift in foreign exchange rates would not have
materially impacted our other income because our foreign currency net asset
position was immaterial.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
Our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer evaluated our
"disclosure controls and procedures" (as defined in Rule 13a-14(c) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") as of a date within 90 days
before the filing date of this quarterly report. They concluded that as of the
evaluation date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide
reasonable assuarance that information we are required to disclose in reports
that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commission rules and forms.
Changes in internal controls
Subsequent to the date of their evaluation, there were no significant changes in
our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these
controls. There were no significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our
internal controls so no corrective actions were taken.
38
Part II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE BY STOCKHOLDERS
We held our Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 15, 2003 to elect our
directors and to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our
independent auditors for the 2003 fiscal year.
All nominees for directors were elected and the appointment of auditors was
ratified. The voting on each matter is set forth below:
Election of the Directors of the Company.
Nominee For Withheld
Robert Bailey 140,595,993 5,975,337
Alexandre Balkanski 136,424,212 10,147,118
James Diller 116,974,197 29,597,133
William Kurtz 137,848,811 8,722,519
Frank Marshall 140,510,812 6,060,518
Lewis Wilks 136,403,094 10,168,236
Proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent
auditors for the 2003 fiscal year.
For Against Abstain
139,005,934 6,678,604 886,793
Item 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits -
o 10.3 2001 Stock Option Plan, as amended
o 11.1 Calculation of income (loss) per share (1)*
o 99.1 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer)
o 99.2 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (Chief Financial Officer)
- --------
1 Refer to Note 5 of the financial statements included in Item I of Part I of
this Quarterly Report.
39
(b) Reports on Form 8-K -
- On July 17, 2003, we furnished a Current Report on Form 8-K to announce
our second quarter results.
- On July 8, 2003, we filed a Current Report on Form 8-K to report the
elimination of our lease obligation relating to one of our office
facilities.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PMC-SIERRA, INC.
(Registrant)
Date: August 11, 2003 /S/ Alan F. Krock
--------------- -------------------------------
Alan F. Krock
Vice President, Finance
Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer
40
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Robert L. Bailey, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PMC-Sierra, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.
Date: August 11, 2003 /S/ Robert L. Bailey
--------------- ---------------------------------
Robert L. Bailey
President and
Chief Executive Officer
41
I, Alan F. Krock, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PMC-Sierra, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.
Date: August 11, 2003 /S/ Alan F. Krock
--------------- ---------------------------------
Alan F. Krock
Vice President, Finance
Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer
42