The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates include useful lives of property, plant and equipment, valuation of long-lived assets, allocated operating costs and estimated costs of liquidation. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The financial statements as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 are presented on a liquidation basis of accounting. As such, assets are stated at estimated realizable values and liabilities are stated at estimated settlement amounts. In addition, depreciation and amortization ceased upon conversion to liquidation accounting and capital expenditures were expensed as incurred.

Net assets in liquidation as of June 30, 2004 represent the estimated distributions to the Partnership's limited partners and the general partners including Enstar Communications Corporation (the "Corporate General Partner"). Distributions ultimately made to the partners upon liquidation will differ from the net assets in liquidation recorded in the accompanying statements of net assets in liquidation as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 as a result of claims on the indemnity escrow and adjustments to accrued costs of liquidation. Accrued costs of liquidation were increased by $2,300 and $4,200 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively. Cash and cash equivalents decreased as a result of payments of amounts owed to Telecommunications Management. No assurance can be given as to the amount of final distributions to be made to the partners.

Effective August 31, 2003, pursuant to an asset purchase agreement dated November 8, 2002 as amended, the Partnership completed the sale of its only remaining cable system to Telecommunications Management, LLC ("Telecommunications Management") for a total adjusted sales price of approximately $1,267,000 (approximately $800 per customer acquired), subject to post closing adjustments (the "Telecommunications Management Sale"). The Telecommunications Management Sale was part of a larger transaction in which the Partnership and eight other affiliated partnerships sold all of their remaining assets used in the operations of their respective cable systems to Telecommunications Management for a total cash sales price of $12,354,600 after closing adjustments.

The Corporate General Partner's intention is to terminate the Partnership as expeditiously as possible in accordance with the Partnership Agreement. The Partnership made an initial distribution payment of $3.4 million to its limited partners in November 2003. A second and final liquidating distribution will occur on or after October 2004 upon the release of the indemnity escrow and the receipt of the remaining proceeds of such escrow if any.

The Partnership has a management and service agreement (the "Management Agreement") with Enstar Cable Corporation ("Enstar Cable"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Corporate General Partner, pursuant to which the Partnership pays a monthly management fee of 5% of gross revenues to Enstar Cable excluding revenues from the sale of cable television systems or franchises. Management fee expense approximated $0 and $11,900 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $0 and $23,100 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Management fees are non- interest bearing.

In addition to the monthly management fee, the Partnership reimburses Enstar Cable for direct expenses incurred on behalf of the Partnership, and for the Partnership's allocable share of operational costs associated with services provided by Enstar Cable. The Corporate General Partner is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Charter Communications, Inc. ("Charter"). Additionally, Charter and its affiliates provide other management and operational services for the Partnership. These expenses are charged to the properties served based primarily on the Partnership's allocable share of operational costs associated with the services provided. The total amount charged to the Partnership for these services approximated $0 and $16,100 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $0 and $29,500 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Substantially all programming services were purchased through Charter. Charter charged the Partnership for these costs based on its costs. The Partnership recorded programming fee expense of $0 and $56,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $0 and $112,500 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Programming fees are included in service costs in the accompanying condensed statements of changes in net assets in liquidation.

As disclosed in Charter's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2004, Charter is the defendant in twenty-three class action and shareholder lawsuits. On August 5, 2004, Charter entered into Memoranda of Understanding setting forth agreements in principle regarding settlement of these class actions and shareholder lawsuits. Settlement of those actions under the terms of the memoranda is subject to a number of conditions, and there can be no assurance that the actions will be settled on those terms or at all.

The amended Partnership Agreement generally provides that all cash distributions (as defined) be distributed 1% to the general partners and 99% to the limited partners until the limited partners have received aggregate cash distributions equal to their original capital contributions ("Capital Payback"). The Partnership Agreement also provides that all partnership profits, gains, operational losses, and credits (all as defined) be allocated 1% to the general partners and 99% to the limited partners until the limited partners have been allocated net profits equal to the amount of cash flow required for Capital Payback. After the limited partners have received cash flow equal to their initial investments, the general partners will receive a 1% allocation of cash flow from sale or liquidation of a system until the limited partners have received an annual simple interest return of at least 18% of their initial investments less any distributions from previous system sales and cash distributions from operations after Capital Payback. Thereafter, the respective allocations will be made 15% to the general partners and 85% to the limited partners. Any losses from system sales or exchanges shall be allocated first to all partners having positive capital account balances (based on their respective capital accounts) until all such accounts are reduced to zero and thereafter to the Corporate General Partner. All allocations to limited partners will be based on their respective limited partnership ownership interests.

Upon the disposition of substantially all of the Partnership assets, gains shall be allocated first to the limited partners having negative capital account balances until their capital accounts are increased to zero, next equally among the general partners until their capital accounts are increased to zero, and thereafter as outlined in the preceding paragraph. Upon dissolution of the Partnership, distributions will be made in amounts equal to the respective partners remaining capital account balances. Any negative capital account balances remaining after all allocations and distributions are made must be funded by the respective partners. The Partnership Agreement limits the amount of debt the Partnership may incur.

This report includes certain forward-looking statements regarding, among other things, our future costs of liquidation, legal requirements and our estimated future distributions. Such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties including, without limitation, the uncertainty of legislative and regulatory changes and the costs required to liquidate the Partnership. In addition to the information provided herein, reference is made to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 for additional information regarding such matters and the effect thereof on our business.

Effective August 31, 2003, pursuant to an asset purchase agreement dated November 8, 2002 as amended, the Partnership completed the sale of its only remaining cable system to Telecommunications Management, LLC ("Telecommunications Management") for a total adjusted sales price of approximately $1,267,000 (approximately $800 per customer acquired), subject to post closing adjustments (the "Telecommunications Management Sale"). The Telecommunications Management Sale was part of a larger transaction in which the Partnership and eight other affiliated partnerships sold all of their remaining assets used in the operations of their respective cable systems to Telecommunications Management for a total cash sales price of $12,354,600 after closing adjustments.

The financial statements as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 are presented on a liquidation basis of accounting. As such, assets are stated at estimated realizable values and liabilities are stated at estimated settlement amounts. In addition, depreciation and amortization ceased upon conversion to liquidation accounting and capital expenditures were expensed as incurred.

Net assets in liquidation as of June 30, 2004 represent the estimated distributions to the limited partners and the general partners. Distributions ultimately made to the partners upon liquidation will differ from the net assets in liquidation recorded in the accompanying statements of net assets in liquidation as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 as a result of claims on the indemnity escrow and adjustments to accrued costs of liquidation. Accrued costs of liquidation were increased by $2,300 and $4,200 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively. No assurance can be given as to the amount of final distributions to be made to the partners.

In order to reduce costs during the liquidation period, we submitted a request for a no action letter on October 30, 2003 (the "Letter") from the Division of Corporation Finance (the "Division") of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") seeking to relieve us from filing annual and quarterly reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). The Letter requested that the Division not recommend enforcement action to the Commission against us for not filing these reports, subject to complying with the requirements of the Letter. Our request currently is pending with the Division and no relief has been granted. As such, we will continue to file annual and quarterly reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q under the Exchange Act pending receipt of a favorable no action letter or until final dissolution of the Partnership. In connection with filing the Letter, we undertook not to consent to the admission of any transferee of units as a limited partner in the Partnership, subject to the terms of our partnership agreement, except for transfers for estate planning, gift and intra-family transfer purposes. In a restated Letter filed with the Commission on August 4, 2004, we undertook to adopt a more restrictive policy upon grant of the requested relief. Under this new policy, we undertook not to consent to the admission of any transferee of units as a limited partner in the Partnership, subject to the terms of the partnership agreement, except for transfers by operation of law. In the event we receive approval of the no action letter from the Securities and Exchange Commission, we will continue to provide financial statements to the limited partners in a non-public presentation as required under the partnership agreement.

The Partnership operated its properties through August 31, 2003 but had no operations for the period subsequent to that date as a result of the Telecommunications Management Sale discussed above. In addition, the Partnership changed to the liquidation basis of accounting on December 31, 2002. Accordingly, no discussion of operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 has been provided as the periods are not comparable.

Net assets in liquidation at June 30, 2004 were $942,600, consisting of assets of $963,100, offset by liabilities of $20,500. The net change in net assets in liquidation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, was a decrease of $2,300 and $4,200, respectively, as a result of changes in estimated costs to liquidate the Partnership. Net assets in liquidation at December 31, 2003 were $946,800, consisting of assets of $1,040,100, offset by liabilities of $93,300. The net change in net assets in liquidation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 was an increase of $88,800 and $144,200, respectively, as a result of net operating results of the Partnership's cable systems.

Cash and cash equivalents decreased $73,600 from $979,700 at December 31, 2003 to $906,100 at June 30, 2004. The decrease was primarily attributable to payments of amounts owed to Telecommunications Management.

The Corporate General Partner's intention is to terminate the Partnership as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with its partnership agreement. The Partnership made an initial distribution payment of $3.4 million to its limited partners in November 2003. A second and final liquidating distribution will occur on or after October 2004 upon the release of the indemnity escrow and the receipt of the remaining proceeds of such escrow, if any.

Charter and our Corporate General Partner have had communications and correspondence with representatives of certain limited partners, and others, concerning certain Enstar partnerships of which our Corporate General Partner is also the Corporate General Partner. While we are not aware of any formal litigation which has been filed relating to the communications and correspondence, or the subject matter referred to therein, it is impossible to predict what actions may be taken in the future or what loss contingencies may result therefrom.

As disclosed in Charter's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2004, Charter is the defendant in twenty-three class action and shareholder lawsuits. On August 5, 2004, Charter entered into Memoranda of Understanding setting forth agreements in principle regarding settlement of the class actions and shareholder lawsuits. Settlement of those actions under the terms of the memoranda is subject to a number of conditions, and there can be no assurance that the actions will be settled on those terms or at all.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, our Corporate General Partner, including our Chief Administrative Officer, acting in the capacity of our Principal Executive Officer, and our Principal Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures with respect to the information generated for use in this quarterly report. The evaluation was based in part upon reports and affidavits provided by a number of executives of the Corporate General Partner. Based upon, and as of the date of that evaluation, our Chief Administrative Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurances that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms.

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based upon the above evaluation, we believe that our controls do provide such reasonable assurances.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: August 18, 2004