THIS DOCUMENT IS A COPY OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FILED ON NOVEMBER 15, 2002 PURSUANT TO A RULE 201 TEMPORARY HARDSHIP EXEMPTION. |
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
[X] |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002. |
|
|
||
[ ] |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM _______ TO _______. |
QUESTAR CORPORATION |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
State of Utah |
87-0407509 |
|
|
||
P.O. Box 45433 |
(Zip code) |
(801) 324-5000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. |
Yes [X] |
No [ ] |
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. |
Class |
Outstanding as of October 31, 2002 |
|
Common Stock, without par value |
81,912,187 shares |
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
||||||||
Item 1. Financial Statements |
||||||||
QUESTAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES |
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME |
||||||||
(Unaudited) |
||||||||
3 Months Ended |
9 Months Ended |
12 Months Ended |
||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
September 30, |
||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) |
||||||||
REVENUES |
||||||||
Questar Market Resources |
$ 108,877 |
$ 130,619 |
$ 357,580 |
$ 513,541 |
$ 489,906 |
$ 733,018 |
||
Questar Regulated Services |
||||||||
Natural gas distribution |
59,347 |
72,120 |
402,309 |
490,918 |
612,541 |
698,135 |
||
Natural gas transmission |
18,015 |
12,754 |
44,855 |
35,848 |
58,409 |
47,993 |
||
Other |
770 |
1,134 |
2,553 |
3,465 |
3,691 |
4,666 |
||
Corporate and other operations |
3,661 |
8,515 |
10,520 |
29,146 |
19,702 |
40,898 |
||
TOTAL REVENUES |
190,670 |
225,142 |
817,817 |
1,072,918 |
1,184,249 |
1,524,710 |
||
OPERATING EXPENSES |
||||||||
Cost of natural gas and other products sold |
17,328 |
61,385 |
243,414 |
512,567 |
405,858 |
752,382 |
||
Operating and maintenance |
67,368 |
66,348 |
206,523 |
189,178 |
287,700 |
265,087 |
||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
46,953 |
36,499 |
136,723 |
108,552 |
179,906 |
143,352 |
||
Exploration |
1,102 |
1,117 |
4,983 |
4,017 |
7,952 |
7,058 |
||
Abandonment and impairment of gas |
||||||||
and oil properties |
1,411 |
1,489 |
2,466 |
4,084 |
3,553 |
4,150 |
||
Production and other taxes |
10,329 |
11,259 |
33,933 |
48,040 |
41,878 |
61,648 |
||
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES |
144,491 |
178,097 |
628,042 |
866,438 |
926,847 |
1,233,677 |
||
OPERATING INCOME |
46,179 |
47,045 |
189,775 |
206,480 |
257,402 |
291,033 |
||
Interest and other income |
1,329 |
2,577 |
17,894 |
21,503 |
31,689 |
25,999 |
||
Minority interest |
4 |
457 |
301 |
1,454 |
572 |
1,870 |
||
Earnings (loss) from unconsolidated affiliates |
6,328 |
367 |
10,090 |
(725) |
10,974 |
419 |
||
Debt expense |
(20,488) |
(17,091) |
(60,886) |
(47,013) |
(78,706) |
(62,668) |
||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
||||||||
AND CUMULATIVE EFFECT |
33,352 |
33,355 |
157,174 |
181,699 |
221,931 |
256,653 |
||
Income taxes |
9,995 |
11,513 |
54,294 |
66,094 |
76,470 |
90,700 |
||
INCOME BEFORE CUMULATIVE |
||||||||
EFFECT |
23,357 |
21,842 |
102,880 |
115,605 |
145,461 |
165,953 |
||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting for |
||||||||
goodwill, net of $2,010 attributed to |
||||||||
minority interest |
(15,297) |
(15,297) |
||||||
NET INCOME |
$ 23,357 |
$ 21,842 |
$ 87,583 |
$ 115,605 |
$ 130,164 |
$ 165,953 |
||
BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE |
||||||||
Income before cumulative effect |
$ 0.28 |
$ 0.27 |
$ 1.26 |
$ 1.43 |
$ 1.78 |
$ 2.06 |
||
Cumulative effect |
(0.19) |
(0.19) |
||||||
Net income |
$ 0.28 |
$ 0.27 |
$ 1.07 |
$ 1.43 |
$ 1.59 |
$ 2.06 |
||
Average basic common shares outstanding |
81,842 |
81,270 |
81,728 |
80,974 |
81,631 |
80,559 |
||
DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE |
||||||||
-2- |
||||||||
Income before cumulative effect |
$ 0.28 |
$ 0.27 |
$ 1.25 |
$ 1.42 |
$ 1.77 |
$ 2.04 |
||
Cumulative effect |
(0.19) |
(0.19) |
||||||
NET INCOME |
$ 0.28 |
$ 0.27 |
$ 1.06 |
$ 1.42 |
$ 1.58 |
$ 2.04 |
||
Average diluted common shares outstanding |
82,398 |
81,600 |
82,487 |
81,605 |
82,320 |
81,307 |
||
Dividends per common share |
$ 0.18 |
$ 0.175 |
$ 0.54 |
$ 0.525 |
$ 0.72 |
$ 0.70 |
||
See notes accompanying the consolidated financial statements |
||||||||
-3- |
QUESTAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES |
|||||
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS |
|||||
September 30, |
December 31, |
||||
2002 |
2001 |
2001 |
|||
(Unaudited) |
|||||
(In Thousands) |
|||||
ASSETS |
|||||
Current assets |
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ 5,222 |
$ - |
$ 11,300 |
||
Accounts receivable |
95,016 |
107,602 |
209,050 |
||
Fair value of hedging contracts |
8,828 |
46,490 |
55,593 |
||
Inventories, at lower of average cost or market |
|||||
Gas and oil storage |
32,526 |
51,404 |
37,055 |
||
Materials and supplies |
10,612 |
11,043 |
12,073 |
||
Purchased-gas adjustments |
42,934 |
8,296 |
|||
Prepaid expenses and other |
11,118 |
14,475 |
16,136 |
||
Deferred income taxes - current |
845 |
||||
Total current assets |
164,167 |
273,948 |
349,503 |
||
Property, plant and equipment |
4,248,504 |
3,924,202 |
4,089,407 |
||
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion |
|||||
and amortization |
1,593,793 |
1,486,754 |
1,524,309 |
||
Net property, plant and equipment |
2,654,711 |
2,437,448 |
2,565,098 |
||
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates |
151,586 |
38,203 |
144,928 |
||
Securities available for sale |
529 |
11,977 |
13,623 |
||
Goodwill |
72,702 |
91,663 |
90,927 |
||
Regulatory and other assets |
55,688 |
74,735 |
76,955 |
||
$ 3,099,383 |
$ 2,927,974 |
$ 3,241,034 |
|||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|||||
Current liabilities |
|||||
Checks outstanding in excess of cash balance |
$ - |
$ 13,828 |
$ - |
||
Short-term loans |
221,505 |
465,783 |
530,246 |
||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
194,909 |
186,241 |
246,037 |
||
Fair value of hedging contracts |
18,895 |
5,248 |
5,323 |
||
Purchased-gas adjustments |
2,223 |
||||
Deferred income taxes - current |
16,315 |
3,153 |
|||
Current portion of long-term debt |
18,831 |
8 |
1,705 |
||
Total current liabilities |
456,363 |
687,423 |
786,464 |
||
Long-term debt, less current portion |
1,178,440 |
857,137 |
997,423 |
||
Other liabilities |
26,987 |
22,549 |
27,286 |
||
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits |
330,266 |
298,697 |
329,275 |
||
Minority interest |
10,005 |
19,292 |
19,805 |
||
Common shareholders' equity |
|||||
Common stock |
294,427 |
279,801 |
282,297 |
||
Retained earnings |
815,848 |
744,492 |
772,408 |
||
Cumulative other comprehensive income (loss) |
(12,953) |
18,583 |
26,076 |
||
Total common shareholders' equity |
1,097,322 |
1,042,876 |
1,080,781 |
||
$ 3,099,383 |
$ 2,927,974 |
$ 3,241,034 |
|||
See notes accompanying the consolidated financial statements |
|||||
-4- |
QUESTAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES |
||||
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
||||
(Unaudited) |
||||
9 Months Ended |
||||
September 30, |
||||
2002 |
2001 |
|||
(In Thousands) |
||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||
Net income |
$ 87,583 |
$ 115,605 |
||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
143,875 |
105,469 |
||
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits |
20,944 |
21,566 |
||
Abandonment and impairment of gas |
||||
and oil properties |
2,466 |
4,084 |
||
(Earnings) loss from unconsolidated affiliates, |
||||
net of cash distributions, and minority interest |
4,188 |
(328) |
||
Gain from selling properties and securities |
(6,517) |
(11,957) |
||
Impairment of securities available for sale |
530 |
1,473 |
||
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
15,297 |
|||
268,366 |
235,912 |
|||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
96,556 |
26,704 |
||
NET CASH PROVIDED FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
364,922 |
262,616 |
||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||
Capital expenditures |
||||
Property, plant and equipment |
(245,192) |
(281,005) |
||
Acquisitions |
(413,823) |
|||
Other investments |
(11,148) |
(4,700) |
||
Total capital expenditures |
(256,340) |
(699,528) |
||
Proceeds from the disposition of property, plant and equipment |
18,222 |
38,141 |
||
Proceeds from the sales of securities and other |
9,113 |
574 |
||
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
(229,005) |
(660,813) |
||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||
Issuance of common stock |
7,291 |
23,618 |
||
Common stock repurchased |
(1,254) |
(12,447) |
||
Issuance of long-term debt |
325,000 |
501,501 |
||
Repayment of long-term debt |
(127,039) |
(356,615) |
||
Change in short-term loans |
(308,741) |
256,644 |
||
Decrease in cash held in escrow account |
6,838 |
5,177 |
||
Checks outstanding in excess of cash balances |
13,828 |
|||
Payment of dividends |
(44,143) |
(42,528) |
||
Other |
52 |
(264) |
||
NET CASH (USED IN ) PROVIDED FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
(141,996) |
388,914 |
||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
1 |
(133) |
||
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
(6,078) |
(9,416) |
||
Beginning cash and cash equivalents |
11,300 |
9,416 |
||
Ending cash and cash equivalents |
$ 5,222 |
$ - |
||
See notes accompanying the consolidated financial statements |
||||
-5- |
QUESTAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES |
|||||||||
NOTES ACCOMPANYING CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|||||||||
September 30, 2002 |
|||||||||
(Unaudited) |
|||||||||
Note 1 - Basis of Presentation |
|||||||||
The interim financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Due to the seasonal nature of the gas distribution business, the results of operations for the three-, nine- and twelve-month periods ended September 30, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2002. The impact of abnormal weather on gas distribution earnings during the heating season is partially reduced by the operation of a weather-normalization adjustment. While the transportation and storage operations of the gas transportation business are influenced by weather conditions, the straight fixed-variable rate design, which allows for recovery of substantially all fixed costs in the demand or reservation charges, reduces the earnings impact of weather conditions. For further in formation please refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. |
|||||||||
Note 2 - New Accounting Standards |
|||||||||
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change - "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" |
|||||||||
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 142 (SFAS 142) "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" was issued in June 2001. SFAS 142 addresses, among other things, the financial accounting and reporting for goodwill subsequent to an acquisition. According to the new standard, amortization of goodwill was replaced by a requirement to test goodwill for impairment at least yearly or sooner if a specific triggering event occurs. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 142 as of January 1, 2002 and performed an initial test that indicated an impairment of the goodwill acquired by Consonus. As a result, the Company wrote off $17.3 million of goodwill, of which, $15.3 million ($.19 per diluted common share) was attributed to Questar InfoComm's share and reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting for goodwill. The remaining $2.0 million was attributed to minority shareholders. Consonus is a data hosting and internet services subsidiary in which Questar InfoComm owns 89%. Goodwi ll has declined in value because of the sharp downturn in the information-technology sector. Consonus recorded $1.7 million of goodwill amortization in 2001 that will not be repeated in future years. The yearly goodwill impairment test required by SFAS 142 will be conducted in the fourth quarter. |
|||||||||
The following table shows net income excluding amortization of goodwill. Amortization of goodwill was not deductible for income tax purposes. |
|||||||||
3 Months Ended |
9 Months Ended |
12 Months Ended |
|||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||
(In Thousands) |
|||||||||
Income before cumulative effect |
$ 23,357 |
$ 21,842 |
$ 102,880 |
$ 115,605 |
$ 145,461 |
$ 165,953 |
|||
Add goodwill amortization |
|
|
|
||||||
deducted in prior periods |
556 |
1,669 |
555 |
2,608 |
|||||
Cumulative effect of change in |
|||||||||
accounting for goodwill, net of $2,010 |
|||||||||
attributed to minority interest |
(15,297) |
(15,297) |
|||||||
Pro forma net income |
$ 23,357 |
$ 22,398 |
$ 87,583 |
$ 117,274 |
$ 130,719 |
$ 168,561 |
|||
-6- |
3 Months Ended |
9 Months Ended |
12 Months Ended |
|||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) |
|||||||
Basic earnings per common share |
|||||||
Income before cumulative effect |
$0.28 |
$0.27 |
$1.26 |
$1.43 |
$1.78 |
$2.06 |
|
Add back goodwill amortization |
.01 |
.02 |
.01 |
.03 |
|||
Cumulative effect |
(.19) |
(.19) |
|||||
Pro forma net income |
$0.28 |
$0.28 |
$1.07 |
$1.45 |
$1.60 |
$2.09 |
|
Basic shares outstanding |
81,842 |
81,270 |
81,728 |
80,974 |
81,631 |
80,559 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|||||||
Income before cumulative effect |
$0.28 |
$0.27 |
$1.25 |
$1.42 |
$1.77 |
$2.04 |
|
Add back goodwill amortization |
.01 |
.02 |
.01 |
.03 |
|||
Cumulative effect |
(.19) |
(.19) |
|||||
Pro forma net income |
$0.28 |
$0.28 |
$1.06 |
$1.44 |
$1.59 |
$2.07 |
|
Diluted shares outstanding |
82,398 |
81,600 |
82,487 |
81,605 |
82,320 |
81,307 |
|
The Company acquired all goodwill reported on its December 31, 2001 balance sheet through purchases of businesses. In 2001, the Company acquired $73 million of goodwill in two business combinations and no impairment was indicated as a result of the initial test. The remaining goodwill balance was acquired in 2000 and 1999. The balance in goodwill in each line of business at December 31, 2001 and September 30, 2002 is listed below: |
Questar |
Questar |
Corporate |
||||
Market |
Regulated |
and Other |
||||
Consolidated |
Resources |
Services |
Operations |
|||
(In Thousands) |
||||||
Balance at December 31, 2001 |
$90,927 |
$66,823 |
$5,876 |
$18,228 |
||
Goodwill attributed to assets sold |
(921) |
(921) |
||||
Impaired goodwill identified in initial SFAS 142 test |
(17,307) |
(17,307) |
||||
Adjustment of allocation |
3 |
3 |
||||
Balance at September 30, 2002 |
$72,702 |
$66,823 |
$5,879 |
$ - |
||
Intangible assets with indefinite lives are subject to a yearly impairment test according to SFAS 142. As of December 31, 2001, the Company held about $592,000 of intangible assets with indefinite lives and no impairment was indicated in an initial test. Intangible assets subject to amortization amounted to $2.6 million, gross, and $1.6 million, net of accumulated amortization. |
||||||
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets |
||||||
The Company adopted SFAS 144 "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" as of January 1, 2002 without an impact in the balance sheet, income statement or statement of cash flows. |
||||||
-7- |
Note 3 - Earnings Per Share |
|||||||||
Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the accounting period. Diluted EPS includes the potential increase in the number of outstanding shares that could result from exercising stock options. |
|||||||||
3 Months Ended |
9 Months Ended |
12 Months Ended |
|||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||
(In Thousands) |
|||||||||
Average basic common shares |
|||||||||
Outstanding |
81,842 |
81,270 |
81,728 |
80,974 |
81,631 |
80,559 |
|||
Potential number of shares issuable |
|||||||||
Under stock option plans |
556 |
330 |
759 |
631 |
689 |
748 |
|||
Average diluted common shares |
|||||||||
Outstanding |
82,398 |
81,600 |
82,487 |
81,605 |
82,320 |
81,307 |
|||
Note 4 - Operations by Line of Business |
|||||||||
3 Months Ended |
9 Months Ended |
12 Months Ended |
|||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||
(In Thousands) |
|||||||||
REVENUES FROM UNAFFILIATED |
|||||||||
CUSTOMERS |
|||||||||
Questar Market Resources |
$ 108,877 |
$ 130,619 |
$ 357,580 |
$ 513,541 |
$ 489,906 |
$ 733,018 |
|||
Questar Regulated Services |
|||||||||
Natural gas distribution |
59,347 |
72,120 |
402,309 |
490,918 |
612,541 |
698,135 |
|||
Natural gas transmission |
18,015 |
12,754 |
44,855 |
35,848 |
58,409 |
47,993 |
|||
Other |
770 |
1,134 |
2,553 |
3,465 |
3,691 |
4,666 |
|||
Total Regulated Services |
78,132 |
86,008 |
449,717 |
530,231 |
674,641 |
750,794 |
|||
Corporate and other operations |
3,661 |
8,515 |
10,520 |
29,146 |
19,702 |
40,898 |
|||
$ 190,670 |
$ 225,142 |
$ 817,817 |
$1,072,918 |
$1,184,249 |
$1,524,710 |
||||
REVENUES FROM AFFILIATED |
|||||||||
COMPANIES |
|||||||||
Questar Market Resources |
$ 24,807 |
$ 22,720 |
$ 81,717 |
$ 75,386 |
$ 106,861 |
$ 103,597 |
|||
Questar Regulated Services |
|||||||||
Natural gas distribution |
145 |
578 |
1,243 |
2,614 |
1,592 |
3,913 |
|||
Natural gas transmission |
18,317 |
17,710 |
58,198 |
56,563 |
77,126 |
76,042 |
|||
Other |
422 |
422 |
1,236 |
1,153 |
1,546 |
1,229 |
|||
Corporate and other operations |
7,669 |
6,655 |
22,803 |
22,881 |
29,366 |
31,602 |
|||
$ 51,360 |
$ 48,085 |
$ 165,197 |
$ 158,597 |
$ 216,491 |
$ 216,383 |
||||
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) |
|||||||||
Questar Market Resources |
$ 30,565 |
$ 42,465 |
$ 97,226 |
$ 130,308 |
$ 126,259 |
$ 172,230 |
|||
Questar Regulated Services |
|||||||||
Natural gas distribution |
(3,908) |
(8,903) |
39,209 |
34,418 |
63,173 |
62,937 |
|||
Natural gas transmission |
17,176 |
14,052 |
47,884 |
43,992 |
63,214 |
57,387 |
|||
-8- |
3 Months Ended |
9 Months Ended |
12 Months Ended |
||||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
September 30, |
||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||
(In Thousands) |
||||||||||
Other |
(144) |
(79) |
(333) |
41 |
(457) |
41 |
||||
Total Regulated Services |
13,124 |
5,070 |
86,760 |
78,451 |
125,930 |
120,365 |
||||
Corporate and other operations |
2,490 |
(490) |
5,789 |
(2,279) |
5,213 |
(1,562) |
||||
OPERATING INCOME |
$ 46,179 |
$ 47,045 |
$ 189,775 |
$ 206,480 |
$ 257,402 |
$ 291,033 |
||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
||||||||||
Questar Market Resources |
$ 16,000 |
$ 23,051 |
$ 56,419 |
$ 82,030 |
$ 75,523 |
$ 108,168 |
||||
Questar Regulated Services |
||||||||||
Natural gas distribution |
(4,667) |
(7,827) |
15,990 |
13,365 |
28,498 |
28,032 |
||||
Natural gas transmission |
8,842 |
7,193 |
24,128 |
21,701 |
32,168 |
30,760 |
||||
Other |
(211) |
703 |
99 |
1,075 |
1,855 |
1,179 |
||||
Total Regulated Services |
3,964 |
69 |
40,217 |
36,141 |
62,521 |
59,971 |
||||
Corporate and other operations |
3,393 |
(1,278) |
6,244 |
(2,566) |
7,417 |
(2,186) |
||||
Income before cumulative effect of |
||||||||||
Accounting change |
23,357 |
21,842 |
102,880 |
115,605 |
145,461 |
165,953 |
||||
Cumulative effect |
(15,297) |
(15,297) |
||||||||
NET INCOME |
$ 23,357 |
$ 21,842 |
$ 87,583 |
$ 115,605 |
$ 130,164 |
$ 165,953 |
||||
Note 5 - Financing |
||||||||||
On July 1, 2002, Questar Corporation filed a shelf registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to issue up to $400 million of common equity or debt convertible into common stock. While it is the Company's intention to issue no more than $200 million in securities initially, the filing was made for an amount to register both the convertible debt that could be issued and the subsequent common stock that would be issued in a convertible debt offering. Currently there are no plans to issue securities under this shelf registration. |
||||||||||
On January 16, 2002, Questar Market Resources, Inc. (QMR) issued $200 million of notes in a private placement to finance its short-term debt following the 2001 acquisition of Shenandoah Energy, Inc. The notes mature in five years and have a coupon rate of 7%. Subsequently, the private placement notes were registered with the SEC and exchange notes with the same terms were issued in April 2002. |
||||||||||
Note 6 - Sale of Canadian Properties |
||||||||||
On October 21, 2002, QMR sold its Canadian exploration and production subsidiary to EnerMark Inc., a subsidiary of Calgary-based Enerplus Resources Fund. Total consideration for 100% of the shares and retirement of associated debt was $US 105.6 million, subject to a one-time post-close adjustment in December 2002 to reflect changes, if any, in the Celsius Energy Resources, Ltd. (CERL) working capital balance as of the July 31, 2002 effective date of the transaction. CERL earned net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 of $US 1.5 million and had total assets of $US 80 million at September 30, 2002. CERL's daily gas production of 28 million cubic feet equivalent represents approximately 10% of QMR's current nonregulated production. At year-end 2001, CERL had 81.8 billion cubic feet equivalent (Bcfe) of natural gas and oil reserves, representing about 7% of QMR's nonregulated reserves. QMR will use the proceeds from the sale to repay debt. |
||||||||||
-9- |
||||||||||
Note 7 - Sale of TransColorado |
||||||||||
On October 20, 2002 Questar Pipeline sold Questar TransColorado, Inc., the holding company owning Questar's interest in the TransColorado pipeline to Kinder Morgan, Inc. and affiliates for $105.5 million. The sale was effective October 1, 2002, subject to normal review by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust legislation. Affiliates of Questar and Kinder Morgan were co-owners of the TransColorado pipeline that extended from northwestern Colorado to northern New Mexico. Questar TransColorado exercised a contractual right (put) in 2001 to sell its 50% interest to an affiliate of Kinder Morgan. Following lengthy legal proceedings, a Colorado court issued a judgment upholding Questar's right to exercise the put. The proceeds from the sale are being held in escrow pending the outcome of the FTC review and when released will be used to retire debt at Questar Pipeline. |
||||||||||
Note 8 - Partnership Interest Acquisition |
||||||||||
On October 30, 2002, Questar Overthrust Pipeline Co., an affiliate of Questar Pipeline, acquired the final 10% partnership interest in the Overthrust Pipeline Company from an El Paso affiliate, CIG Overthrust Inc. The $1.8 million transaction gives Questar, through two affiliates, 100% interest in the 88-mile line, which runs from Evanston, Wyoming to Rock Springs, Wyoming. The Overthrust pipeline was initially constructed as the westernmost leg of the 800-mile Trailblazer pipeline that continues to Beatrice, Nebraska. In the first quarter of 2002, Questar Pipeline had acquired an additional 18% interest in the Overthrust pipeline from Natural Gas Pipeline, an affiliate of Kinder Morgan. |
||||||||||
Note 9 - Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliates |
||||||||||
Questar, indirectly through subsidiaries, has interests in businesses accounted for on the equity basis. Questar uses the equity method to account for investments in affiliates in which it does not have control. As of September 30, 2002, these affiliates did not have debt obligations with third-party lenders. The principal business activities, form of organization and percentage ownership are as follows: Canyon Creek Compression Co., a general partnership, (15%); Blacks Fork Gas Processing Co., a general partnership, (50%); and Rendezvous Gas Services LLC, a limited liability corporation, (50%); are engaged in processing and/or gathering natural gas. Overthrust Pipeline Co., a general partnership, (90%); and Questar TransColorado (a subsidiary of Questar Pipeline) owns 50% of TransColorado Pipeline, a general partnership, are in the gas transportation business. As previously discussed in Notes 7 and 8, beginning with the fourth quarter of 2002 the relationships with Overthrust Pipeline a nd TransColorado will change. Prior to October 2002, Questar Pipeline did not have a controlling interest in Overthrust Pipeline Co. because the approval of the other partner was required for significant partnership decisions. |
Summarized gross operating results of the businesses follow. |
||||
9 Months Ended |
||||
September 30, |
||||
2002 |
2001 |
|||
(In Thousands) |
||||
Transportation |
||||
Revenues |
$ 24,992 |
$ 11,850 |
||
Operating income (loss) |
14,732 |
(1,049) |
||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
14,791 |
(9,546) |
||
Gas gathering and processing |
||||
Revenues |
$ 16,996 |
$ 19,899 |
||
Operating income |
5,438 |
1,709 |
||
Income before income taxes |
5,492 |
1,957 |
||
-10- |
Note 10 - Comprehensive Income |
||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income is the sum of net income as reported in the Consolidated Statement of Income and other comprehensive income transactions reported in Shareholders' Equity. Other comprehensive income transactions that result from changes in the market value of securities available for sale, changes in the market value of energy-hedging contracts and changes in holding value resulting from foreign currency translation adjustments. These transactions are not the culmination of the earnings process, but result from periodically adjusting historical balances to market value. Income or loss is realized when the securities available for sale are sold or the gas or oil underlying the hedging contracts is sold. |
||||||||||||||
3 Months Ended |
9 Months Ended |
|||||||||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||||||
(In Thousands) |
||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ 23,357 |
$ 21,842 |
$ 87,583 |
$ 115,605 |
||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
||||||||||||||
Unrealized income (loss) on hedging transactions |
(11,965) |
27,741 |
(57,824) |
30,769 |
||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities |
||||||||||||||
available for sale |
314 |
(7,736) |
(5,242) |
(19,571) |
||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(2,126) |
(1,953) |
113 |
(2,391) |
||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before |
||||||||||||||
income taxes |
(13,777) |
18,052 |
(62,953) |
8,807 |
||||||||||
Income taxes on other comprehensive income (loss) |
(5,763) |
6,462 |
(23,924) |
2,811 |
||||||||||
Net other comprehensive income (loss) |
(8,014) |
11,590 |
(39,029) |
5,996 |
||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ 15,343 |
$ 33,432 |
$ 48,554 |
$ 121,601 |
||||||||||
Note 11 - Securities Available for Sale |
||||||||||||||
The cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and fair value of the Company's investments in equity securities available for sale are shown below. The Company sold securities in the first nine months of 2002 and realized a pretax gain of $.7 million. The proceeds from the sales amounted to $8.4 million and were used to reduce debt. The Company wrote off a $.5 million investment in a security available for sale when the underlying business ceased operations in the first quarter of 2002. The Company recorded a $1.5 million impairment in 2001. There were no sales of securities available for sale in the first nine months of 2001. Gain and loss from sale is determined on an average cost basis. |
||||||||||||||
September 30, |
December 31, |
|||||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2001 |
||||||||||||
(In Thousands) |
||||||||||||||
Cost |
$ 529 |
$ 9,167 |
$ 8,381 |
|||||||||||
Gross unrealized gain |
3,464 |
5,242 |
||||||||||||
Gross unrealized loss |
(654) |
|||||||||||||
Fair value at end of period |
$ 529 |
$ 11,977 |
$ 13,623 |
|||||||||||
Note 12 - Reclassifications |
Certain reclassifications were made to the 2001 financial statements to conform with the 2002 presentation. |
-11- |
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|||||||||
September 30, 2002 (Unaudited) |
|||||||||
Results of Operations |
|||||||||
Questar Market Resources |
|||||||||
Questar Market Resources (QMR or the Company) through its subsidiaries conducts gas and oil exploration, development and production, gas gathering and processing, and energy marketing operations. Wexpro, a subsidiary of QMR, conducts cost of service development of gas reserves on behalf of Questar Gas Company, an affiliated company. Wexpro earns a return on capital invested to develop these reserves and passes through its costs, which are included in Questar Gas's gas costs. Following is a summary of QMR's financial results and operating information. |
|||||||||
3 Months Ended |
9 Months Ended |
12 Months Ended |
|||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||
FINANCIAL RESULTS - (In thousands) |
|||||||||
Revenues |
|||||||||
From unaffiliated customers |
$108,877 |
$130,619 |
$357,580 |
$513,541 |
$489,906 |
$733,018 |
|||
From affiliates |
24,807 |
22,720 |
81,717 |
75,386 |
106,861 |
103,597 |
|||
Total revenues |
$133,684 |
$153,339 |
$439,297 |
$588,927 |
$596,767 |
$836,615 |
|||
Operating income |
$ 30,565 |
$ 42,465 |
$ 97,226 |
$130,308 |
$126,259 |
$172,230 |
|||
Net income |
16,000 |
23,051 |
56,419 |
82,030 |
75,523 |
108,168 |
|||
OPERATING STATISTICS |
|||||||||
Nonregulated production volumes |
|||||||||
Natural gas (in million cubic feet) |
19,594 |
18,451 |
59,457 |
50,082 |
79,949 |
67,060 |
|||
Oil and natural gas liquids (in thousands of barrels) |
717 |
715 |
2,200 |
1,732 |
2,968 |
2,278 |
|||
Average daily production (in million cubic feet |
|||||||||
equivalent) |
260 |
247 |
266 |
222 |
268 |
221 |
|||
Nonregulated selling price, net to the well |
|||||||||
Average realized selling price (including hedges) |
|||||||||
Natural gas (per thousand cubic feet) |
$2.49 |
$2.94 |
$2.49 |
$3.44 |
$2.53 |
$3.47 |
|||
Oil and natural gas liquids (per barrel) |
$21.03 |
$20.24 |
$20.15 |
$20.63 |
$19.09 |
$20.61 |
|||
Average selling price (excluding hedges) |
|||||||||
Natural gas (per thousand cubic feet) |
$1.90 |
$2.79 |
$1.97 |
$4.56 |
$2.00 |
$4.55 |
|||
Oil and natural gas liquids (per barrel) |
$24.86 |
$23.64 |
$22.12 |
$25.39 |
$21.07 |
$26.65 |
|||
Wexpro investment base at September 30, net of |
|||||||||
deferred income taxes (in millions) |
$165.8 |
$153.2 |
|||||||
Marketing volumes (in thousands of energy equivalent |
|||||||||
decatherms) |
17,004 |
20,758 |
59,580 |
68,310 |
83,061 |
94,794 |
|||
Natural gas gathering volumes (in thousands of |
|||||||||
decatherms) |
|||||||||
For unaffiliated customers |
23,572 |
21,474 |
69,610 |
68,085 |
93,254 |
92,810 |
|||
For Questar Gas |
7,881 |
8,083 |
29,886 |
26,989 |
40,058 |
37,192 |
|||
For other affiliated customers |
8,828 |
6,382 |
25,480 |
19,782 |
32,747 |
26,696 |
|||
Total gathering |
40,281 |
35,939 |
124,976 |
114,856 |
166,059 |
156,698 |
|||
Gathering revenue (per decatherm) |
$0.15 |
$0.13 |
$0.15 |
$0.13 |
$0.14 |
$0.13 |
|||
-12- |
Exploration and Production Activities Production growth was more than offset by continued weak natural gas prices in the Rocky Mountain region resulting in lower revenues in the 2002 periods presented. Production of nonregulated gas, oil and natural gas liquids (NGL) climbed 5% to 23.9 billion cubic feet equivalent (Bcfe) in the third quarter of 2002 compared with 22.7 Bcfe in the third quarter of 2001 and rose 20% to 72.7 Bcfe in the nine months ended September 30, 2002. QMR purchased producing properties in the Uinta Basin in Utah in July 2001, which represented a significant portion of the year-to-year production growth. In addition, continued successful development drilling in the Uinta Basin in Utah and the Pinedale Anticline in southwestern Wyoming contributed to production increases. Production increased despite curtailments in the second and third quarters of 2002 due to low prices. QMR deliberately shut-in 1.8 Bcfe of Rocky Mountain region production in the third quarter bringing the total shut-in volume to 3.3 Bcfe for 2002. |
|||||||||||
The average realized selling price for natural gas including benefits of cash flow hedges declined 15% from $2.94 to $2.49 per thousand cubic feet (Mcf), net to the well, in the third quarter. Spot prices in the Rocky Mountains fell below $1 per MMBtu for the second consecutive quarter of 2002. During the third quarter, basis differential between gas prices in the Rockies and the Henry Hub (Louisiana) at times exceeded $2 per MMBtu on daily trading. Historically basis has ranged from $.40 to $.60. Growth in the gas supply in the Rockies has exceeded the available pipeline capacity to move gas to markets outside of the area. In addition, demand for gas in the Rockies is much lower during the summer. Realized natural gas prices excluding hedges declined 57% from $4.56 to $1.97 per Mcf, net to the well, in the nine-month comparison for the same reasons that affected the quarter to quarter comparison. Also, a reported energy shortage in the western region of the United States resulted in a spi ke in gas prices in the first quarter of 2001. Approximately 55% of QMR's 2002 gas production was located in the Rocky Mountains. |
|||||||||||
QMR hedged or pre-sold approximately 48% of its nonregulated natural gas production and 66% of its nonregulated oil production during the first three quarters of 2002. As a result, QMR realized selling prices for gas 26% higher than without hedges, while realized oil prices were 10% lower than without hedges. Hedging benefited QMR by incrementally adding $31.2 million to gas revenues, but decreased oil revenues by $4.3 million. QMR does not hedge sales of natural gas liquids. A summary of QMR's energy-price hedging positions for equity gas and oil production, excluding Wexpro, follows. |
|||||||||||
Net revenue interest production under price-hedging contracts |
Average price net to the well |
||||||||||
Gas (Bcf) |
Oil (bbl) |
Gas per Mcf |
Oil per bbl |
||||||||
4th quarter of 2002 |
12.9 |
506,000 |
$3.22 |
$22.82 |
|||||||
12 months of 2003 |
32.7 |
1,095,000 |
$3.23 |
$21.80 |
|||||||
12 months of 2004 |
14.5 |
None |
$3.23 |
- |
|||||||
Wexpro Earnings Wexpro's net income was $2.9 million higher in 2002 as result of an 8% increase in its investment base when compared to September 30, 2001. The investment base net of deferred income taxes and depreciation totaled $165.8 million compared with $153.2 million a year earlier. Wexpro conducts cost of service development of gas reserves on behalf of Questar Gas. Cost of service refers to Wexpro's legal entitlement to reimbursement of its costs and an approved return on investment for operating the gas-development properties. |
|||||||||||
-13- |
|||||||||||
Gas Gathering and Energy Marketing Activities Lower prices and marketing volumes in 2002 resulted in a $.4 million lower marketing margin. Marketing volumes were 13% lower in the first nine months of 2002 compared with the first nine months of 2001. The margin represents revenues less the costs to purchase gas and oil and transportation of gas. Revenues for gathering and processing were $7.6 million higher in the first nine months of 2002 compared with the same period in 2001 as a result of increased activities due to the July 2001 acquisition of properties in the Uinta Basin and increased production in the Rockies. |
|||||||||||
Questar Regulated Services |
|||||||||||
Natural Gas Distribution |
|||||||||||
Questar Gas conducts natural gas distribution operations. Following is a summary of financial results and operating information: |
|||||||||||
3 Months Ended |
9 Months Ended |
12 Months Ended |
|||||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||
FINANCIAL RESULTS - (in thousands) |
|||||||||||
Revenues |
|||||||||||
From unaffiliated customers |
$ 59,347 |
$ 72,120 |
$ 402,309 |
$ 490,918 |
$ 612,541 |
$ 698,135 |
|||||
From affiliates |
145 |
578 |
1,243 |
2,614 |
1,592 |
3,913 |
|||||
Total revenues |
59,492 |
72,698 |
403,552 |
493,532 |
614,133 |
702,048 |
|||||
Cost of natural gas sold |
26,743 |
47,061 |
251,934 |
353,815 |
396,664 |
497,180 |
|||||
Margin |
$ 32,749 |
$ 25,637 |
$ 151,618 |
$ 139,717 |
$ 217,469 |
$ 204,868 |
|||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ (3,908) |
$ (8,903) |
$ 39,209 |
$ 34,418 |
$ 63,173 |
$ 62,937 |
|||||
Net income (loss) |
$ (4,667) |
$ (7,827) |
$ 15,990 |
$ 13,365 |
$ 28,498 |
$ 28,032 |
|||||
OPERATING STATISTICS |
|||||||||||
Natural gas volumes (in thousands of |
|||||||||||
decatherms) |
|||||||||||
Residential and commercial sales |
6,954 |
6,285 |
61,099 |
54,411 |
90,338 |
87,217 |
|||||
Industrial sales |
1,882 |
1,988 |
7,678 |
7,774 |
10,588 |
10,844 |
|||||
Transportation for industrial customers |
12,774 |
13,421 |
34,465 |
42,706 |
46,383 |
56,761 |
|||||
Total deliveries |
21,610 |
21,694 |
103,242 |
104,891 |
147,309 |
154,822 |
|||||
Natural gas revenue (per decatherm) |
|||||||||||
Residential and commercial |
$ 6.75 |
$ 8.79 |
$ 5.74 |
$ 7.87 |
$ 5.98 |
$ 7.04 |
|||||
Industrial sales |
3.42 |
5.45 |
4.34 |
5.39 |
4.50 |
5.15 |
|||||
Transportation for industrial customers |
0.16 |
0.13 |
0.16 |
0.13 |
0.15 |
0.13 |
|||||
Heating degree days |
|||||||||||
Actual |
61 |
32 |
3,786 |
3,304 |
5,969 |
5,743 |
|||||
Normal |
97 |
97 |
3,430 |
3,430 |
5,609 |
5,609 |
|||||
Colder (warmer) than normal |
(37%) |
(67%) |
10% |
(4%) |
6% |
2% |
|||||
Average temperature-adjusted usage per |
|||||||||||
customer (decatherms) |
10.0 |
10.2 |
77.2 |
80.0 |
118.2 |
122.2 |
|||||
Number of customers at September 30, |
|||||||||||
Residential and commercial |
733,986 |
714,941 |
|||||||||
Industrial |
1,281 |
1,329 |
|||||||||
Total |
735,267 |
716,270 |
|||||||||
-14- |
|||||||||||
Revenues less cost of gas sold (margin) |
|||||||||||
Several events, including a one-time recovery of certain gas processing costs originally incurred in 1999, led to Questar Gas reporting higher margins in the 2002 periods presented when compared with the same periods of 2001. The Public Service Commission of Utah (PSCU) allowed Questar Gas to recover $3.76 million in processing costs that it had previously denied. A change in the method of collecting bad debt costs benefited the margin by $.2 million in the third quarter and $2.3 million in the first nine months of 2002. Higher contributions of construction funds from new customers added $.7 million in the third quarter and $1.7 million in the first nine months of 2002. Continued falling usage per customer in the 2002 periods partially offset the positive impact of these events. |
|||||||||||
Questar Gas pays an affiliated company to remove carbon dioxide from its natural gas at a plant that was placed into service in June 1999. The PSCU initially denied Questar Gas's request to recover $5.35 million in processing costs as part of its gas balancing account proceedings. Questar Gas appealed to the Utah Supreme Court and filed for recovery of future processing costs in a general rate case in January 2000. Subsequently, the PSCU approved the recovery of $5 million of processing costs per year beginning in August 2000, but did not allow recovery of the costs for the 14-month period between the startup of the plant and the general rate case. The Utah Supreme Court ruled that the PSCU had erred in not allowing pass through treatment. The PSCU ruled on a remand that Questar Gas be allowed to recover the $3.76 million plus approximately $.2 million of interest. |
|||||||||||
In another measure associated with a pass through rate filing in late 2001, the PSCU allowed Questar Gas to include the gas-cost portion of bad debt expenses in Utah's semi-annual gas cost filings effective January 1, 2002. This change in procedure provides recovery of some of the growing bad debt charges experienced by the Company. The measure was also approved by the Public Service Commission of Wyoming (PSCW) effective July 1, 2002. |
|||||||||||
Declining usage per customer has been a persistent trend experienced by Questar Gas and was a major cause of a general rate increase filed in Utah on May 3, 2002. Average usage per customer on a temperature-adjusted basis has declined by 4% in the first nine months of 2002 compared with the same period of 2001. The lower usage per customer resulted in a $.3 million decrease in the margin in the third quarter and $3.9 million in the first nine months of 2002 compared with the 2001 periods. The effect of declining usage on total gas volumes delivered has been partially offset by a 2.7% increase in the number of customers served. |
|||||||||||
Temperatures have been colder than normal in 2002 causing a 12% increase in the general-service gas volumes when compared with the first nine months of 2001. However, the financial effect was mitigated by a weather-normalization adjustment (WNA). Generally under the WNA, customers pay for non-gas costs based on normal temperatures. |
|||||||||||
Gas volumes delivered to industrial customers were 17% lower in the first nine months of 2002 due to reduced deliveries for manufacturing and power generation. A major steel manufacturer suspended its gas deliveries when it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and shut down its facilities early in 2002. The Company received $812,000 in transportation revenues from this customer in 2001. |
|||||||||||
-15- |
Natural Gas Transmission |
||||||||||||
Questar Pipeline conducts natural gas transmission, storage and processing operations. Following is a summary of |
||||||||||||
Financial results and operating information: |
||||||||||||
3 Months Ended |
9 Months Ended |
12 Months Ended |
||||||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
September 30, |
||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||
FINANCIAL RESULTS - (in thousands) |
||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||
From unaffiliated customers |
$ 18,015 |
$ 12,754 |
$ 44,855 |
$ 35,848 |
$ 58,409 |
$ 47,993 |
||||||
From affiliates |
18,317 |
17,710 |
58,198 |
56,563 |
77,126 |
76,042 |
||||||
Total revenues |
$ 36,332 |
$ 30,464 |
$ 103,053 |
$ 92,411 |
$ 135,535 |
$ 124,035 |
||||||
Operating income |
$ 17,176 |
$ 14,052 |
$ 47,884 |
$ 43,992 |
$ 63,214 |
$ 57,387 |
||||||
Net income |
8,842 |
7,193 |
24,128 |
21,701 |
32,168 |
30,760 |
||||||
OPERATING STATISTICS |
||||||||||||
Natural gas transportation volumes (in |
||||||||||||
Thousands of decatherms) |
||||||||||||
For unaffiliated customers |
65,453 |
53,516 |
173,699 |
143,522 |
225,787 |
193,000 |
||||||
For Questar Gas |
14,704 |
14,303 |
91,971 |
78,735 |
123,495 |
113,200 |
||||||
For other affiliated customers |
1,228 |
1,981 |
2,525 |
3,986 |
5,431 |
6,919 |
||||||
Total transportation |
81,385 |
69,800 |
268,195 |
226,243 |
354,713 |
313,119 |
||||||
Transportation revenue (per decatherm) |
$ 0.30 |
$ 0.27 |
$ 0.25 |
$ 0.25 |
$ 0.25 |
$ 0.24 |
||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||
Questar Pipeline reported higher revenues in the 2002 periods presented when compared with the 2001 periods due to increased transportation activities, adding a new park and loan service and increased gathering of natural gas. Questar Pipeline has expanded its transportation system in response to a growing regional energy transportation demand. Main Line 104 began service in November of 2001 and the eastern segment of the Southern Trails Pipeline initiated service in June of 2002. Main Line 104 has a capacity of 272,000 decatherms per day and the eastern segment of the Southern Trails Pipeline has a daily capacity of 80,000 decatherms per day. Service for both pipelines is fully subscribed. Transportation volumes increased 19% in the nine-month period of 2002 with approximately 97% of the volumes transported under firm contracts. Daily firm-demand volumes increased to 1,389,000 decatherms in the first nine months of 2002 from 1,191,000 decatherms in the prior year period. Questar Pipeline initiated a park and loan service at its Clay Basin storage facility in July of 2002. Revenues from gathering gas by Questar Transportation Services, a subsidiary of Questar Pipeline, increased as a result of operating the non-jurisdictional Huntington lateral, a gathering addition in central Utah. |
||||||||||||
16 |
||||||||||||
Consolidated Results of Operations |
||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||
Revenues were lower in the periods of 2002 when compared with the same periods in 2001 due primarily to lower gas prices. The effect of increased nonregulated production quantities was more than offset by lower realized selling prices for gas in the 2002 periods, even considering the effects of commodity-price hedges. QMR's hedging activities benefited revenues from selling natural gas by $31.2 million, but caused realized revenues from selling oil to be $4.3 million lower in the first nine months of 2002 compared with the same period of 2001. Also, distribution revenues decreased because of lower gas prices and declining usage per customer in the 2002 periods. Lower gas prices and a decrease in the quantities of gas and oil marketed caused a decline in revenues from energy marketing activities. Nonregulated natural gas, oil and other liquids production increased 5% to 23.9 billion cubic feet equivalent (Bcfe) in the third quarter and 20% to 72.7 Bcfe in the first nine months of 2002. QMR purchased producing properties in eastern Utah in July 2001, which accounted for a significant portion of the production growth, along with a continued successful development-drilling program. |
||||||||||||
Cost of natural gas and other products sold |
||||||||||||
The cost of natural gas and other products sold, which primarily includes natural gas distribution and energy marketing activities, was substantially lower in the 2002 periods presented due to a decrease in energy prices, reduced marketing volumes and a one-time recovery of certain processing costs. The gas-cost component in natural gas distribution rates decreased by 42% in the first nine months of 2002 when compared with the same period of 2001 primarily due to lower gas prices. The PSCU allowed Questar Gas to recover $3.76 million in processing costs that it had previously denied. Also, the PSCU allowed Questar Gas to include the gas-cost portion of bad debt expenses in Utah's semi-annual gas cost filings effective January 1, 2002. Energy marketing volumes purchased for resale were 13% lower and the average cost per energy equivalent decatherm was 46% lower in the year-to-date comparison of 2002 with 2001. |
||||||||||||
Operating and maintenance expenses |
||||||||||||
Operating and maintenance expenses were higher in the 2002 periods presented when compared with the same periods in 2001 because of additional gas and oil producing properties and gathering and processing activities, the start-up of operations of the eastern segment of the Southern Trails Pipeline, increased labor-related costs, increased legal fees and higher bad debt expenses. Year-to-date 2002, lease operating expenses (LOE), excluding Wexpro, increased $6.2 million, gas-processing and gathering charges increased $5.9 million and general overhead costs were up $7.3 million over the same period of 2001. The average LOE per energy equivalent Mcf (Mcfe) for the first nine months of 2002 was $.53, unchanged from the same period of the prior year. Operating expenses of the Southern Trails Pipeline were responsible for approximately a $2.3 million increase in the comparison of the year to date periods presented. Labor-related costs, primarily for pension and medical benefits, increased $.4 milli on in the third quarter and $2.6 million in the first nine months of 2002. Pension expenses have increased because of reduced returns earned on assets held in pension trust funds. Legal expenses were $1 million higher in the first nine months of 2002 when compared with the 2001 period primarily due to litigation surrounding the TransColorado pipeline. QMR settled litigation during the third quarter of 2002 adding approximately $.7 million to 2002 general overhead expense. Bad debt expenses associated with natural gas distribution customers were $.7 million higher in the first nine months of 2002. Bad debt costs have risen because of an increasing number of customers and a higher frequency of personal and business bankruptcies. |
||||||||||||
Consonus, a subsidiary of Questar InfoComm, closed the Portland office and downsized the Salt Lake operation due primarily to disappointing operating results, a downturn in the economy and sufficient capacity in the Salt Lake operations. As a result of these actions, Consonus recorded a $1.8 million restructuring charge in the first nine months of 2001. The charge included $1.5 million in severance pay, $.2 million for assets abandoned when closing the Portland operations, and $.1 million for lease expense related to the discontinued Portland operations. |
||||||||||||
-17- |
||||||||||||
Depreciation, amortization and depletion |
||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A) expense was higher in the 2002 periods primarily due to increases in gas and oil producing properties and pipelines. Equity production volumes increased 20% and the average DD&A rate for exploration and production activities increased from $.80 per Mcfe in 2001 to $.89 in the first nine months of 2002 compared with the 2001 period. Main Line 104 and the Southern Trails pipeline are two new pipeline projects adding to the depreciable asset base. Increased investment in computer equipment and software, which are depreciated over a relatively short life, have resulted in higher depreciation expense in the 2002 periods. |
||||||||||||
Production and other taxes |
||||||||||||
Changes in production and other taxes follow the changes in gas and oil selling prices. Production taxes amounted to $.16 per Mcfe in 2002 compared with $.29 per Mcfe in 2001 and decreased because of lower selling prices. |
||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
||||||||||||
On October 20, 2002, the complex legal issues between the partners of TransColorado Gas Transmission Company were resolved with the sale of Questar TransColorado, Inc.'s 50% interest in the TransColorado Pipeline for $105.5 million. The parties arranged the sale after a Colorado judge declared that Questar TransColorado's right to put (sell) its 50% interest in the pipeline to an affiliate of Kinder Morgan was valid and enforceable. As a result of the sale, the Company reduced the carrying value of its investment in TransColorado by $3 million in the third quarter of 2002 to reflect the net realizable value of the sale. |
||||||||||||
QMR sold various gas and oil producing properties resulting in a pretax gain of $5.5 million in the first nine months of 2002, compared with a pretax gain of $10.0 million in the 2001 period. QMR settled a lawsuit in the second quarter of 2002 and recorded a $4.5 million pretax or a $2.8 million after-tax gain. The Company sold securities in the first nine months of 2002 and realized a pretax gain of $.7 million. The proceeds from the sales amounted to $8.4 million. The Company wrote off a $.5 million investment in a security available for sale when the underlying business ceased operations in the first quarter of 2002. There were no sales of securities in the first nine months of 2001. The Company used the proceeds from assets and securities sales to reduce debt. |
||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from unconsolidated affiliates |
||||||||||||
The Company's share of the TransColorado partnership was a pretax profit of $4.8 million for the third quarter and $6.9 million for the first nine months of 2002. The pipeline has operated near capacity in the second and third quarters of 2002 as a result of the wide basis differentials between gas prices in the Rockies and the San Juan Basin. TransColorado reported a $2.2 million pretax loss for the year earlier nine-month period. Pretax income from unconsolidated affiliates engaged in gathering and processing activities rose $1.5 million year to date 2002 compared with the same period of 2001. Rendezvous LLC began gathering and processing operations in the fourth quarter of 2001 and accounted for approximately a $1.1 million increase in pretax earnings. QMR's share of pretax earnings from the Blacks Fork partnership increased approximately $.6 million in 2002 due to improved operating margins resulting from lower gas prices in the Rockies. |
||||||||||||
Debt Expense |
||||||||||||
Debt expense was higher in the 2002 periods reflecting the Company's increased debt levels. The Company used debt financing for a significant portion of its investment in long-lived assets in recent years. In addition, in October 2001, Questar Pipeline borrowed $100 million of floating-rate debt from a bank for a 12-month period to repay, through a wholly owned subsidiary, Questar TransColorado, Inc., one-half of the outstanding and currently maturing debt owed by the TransColorado Gas Transmission Company. However, in 2002 the Company embarked on a plan to reduce debt by applying the proceeds from asset sales. Proceeds from assets sales of over $235 million, including approximately $210 million from asset sales occurring in the fourth quarter of 2002, have been or will be used to reduce debt. |
||||||||||||
-18- |
||||||||||||
Income taxes |
||||||||||||
The effective income tax rate for the first nine months was 34.5% in 2002 and 36.4% in 2001. The Company recognized $4.6 million of non-conventional fuel tax credits in the 2002 period and $5.1 million in the 2001 period. Under current law, the federal income tax credit for producing fuel from a non-conventional source will not apply to production sold after December 31, 2002 . Excluding non-conventional fuel credits would have the effect of increasing the effective income tax rate to 37.5% and reducing net income for the first nine months of 2002. Also, the Company recognized net operating loss tax benefits of Consonus amounting to $1.2 million, which reduced tax expenses in the third quarter and nine months of 2002. |
||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting method for goodwill |
||||||||||||
The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 142 as of January 1, 2002 and performed an initial test that indicated an impairment of the goodwill acquired by Consonus. As a result, the Company wrote off $17.3 million of goodwill, of which, $15.3 million ($.19 per diluted common share) was attributed to Questar InfoComm's share and reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting for goodwill. The remaining $2.0 million was attributed to minority shareholders. Consonus recorded $1.7 million of goodwill amortization in 2001 that will not be repeated in 2002 and future years. |
||||||||||||
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
||||||||||||
Operating Activities |
||||||||||||
Net cash provided from operating activities in the first nine months of 2002 was $102.3 million more than was provided during the first nine months of 2001. The increase in cash flows resulted primarily from changes in operating assets and liabilities. Collections of accounts receivable accounted for the largest amount. The value of gas injected into storage was lower in 2002 as a result of lower gas prices. The purchased-gas adjustment account changed to an over-collected position in 2002 from an under-collected balance in 2001. |
||||||||||||
Investing Activities |
||||||||||||
Capital expenditures by lines of business for the first nine months of 2002 and 2001 plus an estimate for calendar years 2002 and 2003 are presented below. Forecasted 2002 capital expenditures for Corporate and other operations includes an exception fund of $8.4 million that is expected to be allocated to subsidiary operations. The exception fund's beginning balance for 2002 and 2003 was $25 million. |
||||||||||||
Actual |
Forecast |
|||||||||||
9 Months Ended |
12 Months Ended |
|||||||||||
September 30, |
December 31, |
|||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
(In Thousands) |
||||||||||||
Questar Market Resources |
$ 130,380 |
$ 547,937 |
$192,800 |
$189,900 |
||||||||
Questar Regulated Services |
||||||||||||
Natural gas distribution |
42,489 |
53,332 |
85,100 |
59,600 |
||||||||
Natural gas transmission |
81,197 |
90,827 |
72,100 |
101,400 |
||||||||
Other |
1,206 |
1,783 |
5,600 |
4,400 |
||||||||
Total Questar Regulated Services |
124,892 |
145,942 |
162,800 |
165,400 |
||||||||
Corporate and other operations |
1,068 |
5,649 |
29,900 |
10,300 |
||||||||
$ 256,340 |
$ 699,528 |
$385,500 |
$365,600 |
|||||||||
-19- |
Financing Activities |
Net cash flow provided from operating activities plus the proceeds from selling assets were more than sufficient to finance capital expenditures and pay dividends. The excess cash flow plus the proceeds from issuing $325 million of debt were used to repay approximately $436 million of debt. The issuance of long-term debt was part of a financing plan undertaken since acquiring SEI. The Company expects to finance the remaining 2002 capital expenditures from the net cash flow provided from operating activities and the proceeds from selling assets. |
Currently, the Company's lines-of-credit capacity is $225 million. Short-term borrowings at September 30, 2002 were comprised of $121.5 million of commercial paper and $100 million of short-term bank loans. A year earlier, the Company had $355.4 million of commercial paper and $110.4 million of short-term bank loans outstanding, primarily as a result of acquiring SEI. |
The Company is selling assets and reducing capital expenditures to reduce leverage to the range of 50%. Through October of 2002, the Company has generated proceeds of over $235 million from selling assets. |
General rate case filed |
Questar Gas filed a general rate case application with the PSCU on May 3, 2002. The Company is requesting an increase in Utah natural gas rates effective January 1, 2003, to reflect $17.8 million of annualized revenues and includes a 12.6% return on equity. Questar Gas earned a return on equity for 2001 of 9.1%. The PSCU has currently authorized a return on equity of 11.0%. A settlement has been presented to the PSCU, which would adopt a year-end 2002 test year as opposed to using prior year expenses in setting future rates. If the proposed settlements presented to the PSCU are adopted, the only remaining issues are the rate of return and capital structure. The Division of Public Utilities has suggested a 10.5% return. The Committee of Consumer Services proposed a 10% return on equity and proposed using short-term debt to reduce the equity component of the capital structure. The Company expects a general rate order from the PSCU prior to year end. Under Utah law, the general rate inc rease becomes effective 240 days after filing, if the PSCU does not render a decision by that date. |
Purchased-gas filings |
Effective January 1, 2002, the PSCU approved, on an interim basis, a $66.9 million decrease in natural gas rates that resulted in an 11% decrease for the typical residential Utah customer. The decrease was based on a significant drop in natural gas prices at the wellhead. Also, effective January 1, 2002, the PSCW approved a $2.9 million pass-through gas cost decrease for Wyoming natural gas rates. Questar Gas routinely submits purchased-gas adjustment or "pass-through" filings. |
In May of 2002, the Company filed for gas-cost increases in both Utah and Wyoming. Because of subsequent reductions in gas-price forecasts, the Company requested to suspend the increases. No subsequent requests have been filed. |
Moody's Downgrades Debt Ratings of Questar and Subsidiaries |
Moody's downgraded debt ratings of Questar and subsidiaries one level completing a review that began May 2, 2002. Moody's established a Prime-2 rating for Questar Corp. commercial paper, an A2 senior unsecured debt rating for both Questar Pipeline and Questar Gas, and a Baa3 rating for the senior unsecured debt of QMR. Also, Moody's established a stable outlook for each Questar entity. Formerly, Moody's had given a Prime-1 rating for Questar Corp. commercial paper, an A1 senior unsecured debt rating for both Questar Pipeline and Questar Gas, and a Baa2 rating for the senior unsecured debt of QMR. A lower debt rating may increase the Company's cost of debt. However, Moody's revised ratings are solidly investment grade. The downgrade will not materially affect the Company's growth strategy. |
-20- |
On July 1, 2002, Questar Corporation filed a shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission to issue common equity or mandatory convertible securities, if necessary, to achieve debt-reduction goals. Since the announcement of Moody's review, the Company has diligently taken action to reduce debt through the sale of assets. Through October 2002, over $235 million of cash has been raised through the sale of assets by Questar and its subsidiaries. Currently, there are no immediate plans for Questar to issue securities. |
Business with Energy Merchants |
Questar Pipeline has significant transportation and storage business with some energy merchants that have recently had their debt ratings downgraded. Questar Pipeline requests credit support from those companies that pose unfavorable credit risks. All companies posing such concerns were current on their accounts as of the date of this report. The Company's largest contracts, other than those with its affiliate Questar Gas, are with Williams Energy Marketing and Trading with an annual reservation fee of $6.3 million for transportation and storage services and El Paso Resources with an annual reservation fee of $4.4 million for transportation services. |
QMR has significant gas sales to energy merchants, some of which have recently had their debt ratings downgraded. All companies with such concerns were current on their accounts as of the date of this report. QMR requests credit support and, in some cases, fungible collateral from companies with noninvestment grade ratings. |
TransColorado Case |
On October 20, 2002, the complex legal issues between the partners of TransColorado Gas Transmission Company were resolved with the sale of Questar TransColorado 50% interest in the TransColorado Pipeline to Kinder Morgan. The sale was arranged after a Colorado judge declared that Questar TransColorado's right to put (sell) its 50% interest in the pipeline to an affiliate of Kinder Morgan was valid and enforceable. |
Western Segment of Southern Trails Pipeline |
The Company has put in a place a project team, including a consulting firm, to market the transportation capacity of the western segment of the Southern Trails pipeline. In addition, the FERC approved an order for Questar Southern Trails Pipeline Company that lowered the annual depreciation rate from 4% to 3%. |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
QMR's primary market-risk exposures arise from commodity-price changes for natural gas, oil and other hydrocarbons and changes in interest rates. QMR sold its foreign affiliate in the fourth quarter of 2002 eliminating its foreign exchange risk. A QMR subsidiary has long-term contracts for pipeline capacity for the next several years and is obligated for transportation services with no guarantee that it will be able to recover the full cost of these transportation commitments. |
QMR bears a majority of the risk associated with commodity price changes and uses energy-price hedging arrangements in the normal course of business to limit the risk of adverse price movements. However, these same arrangements usually limit future gains from favorable price movements. The hedging contracts exist for a significant share of QMR-owned gas and oil production and for a portion of energy-marketing transactions. |
-21- |
Commodity-Price Risk Management |
The Company has established policies and procedures for managing commodity price risks through the use of derivatives. The primary objectives of these energy price hedging transactions are to support the Company's earnings targets and to protect earnings from downward movements in commodity prices. The volume of production hedged and the mix of derivative instruments employed are regularly evaluated and adjusted by management in response to changing market conditions and reviewed periodically by the Company's Board of Directors. It is the Company's current policy to hedge approximately 75% of the current year's proved-developed producing production by the first of March in the current year, at or above selling prices that support our budgeted income levels. The Company will add incrementally to these hedges, to reach forward beyond the current year when price levels are attractive. Additionally, under the terms of QMR's revolving credit facility, not more than 75% of forecasted production quantities from proved reserves can be committed to hedging arrangements. The Company does not enter into derivative arrangements for speculative purposes and does not hedge undeveloped production quantities. |
Natural gas prices in the Rocky Mountain region have been depressed in 2002. The basis differential, the difference between Rockies prices and the benchmark Henry Hub (Louisiana) price, at times exceeded $2.00 per MMBtu in the second and third quarters of 2002, the widest differential in nearly a decade. This widening basis differential results from a combination of increased regional production, weak seasonal demand, and inadequate capacity in pipelines that transport Rockies gas out of the region. Rockies prices may remain depressed until regional demand increases and/or major new export pipelines are built. The expansion of the Kern River pipeline will improve pipeline capacity out of the Rockies but may not immediately return Rockies basis to historical ranges. With the acquisition of SEI in 2001, and with increased investment in development of the Company's Pinedale Anticline acreage, a growing percentage of the Company's production is in the Rockies region. |
Management attention is focused on improving Rockies prices, net to the well, by hedging when market price fluctuations provide the opportunity to do so. In addition, the Company may curtail production, as was done in the second and third quarters of 2002, when prices are below levels necessary for profitability. |
Accounting for hedging transactions |
The Company may elect to designate a derivative instrument as a hedge of exposure to changes in fair value, cash flows or foreign currencies. If the hedged exposure is a fair-value exposure, the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is recognized in earnings in the period of the change together with the offsetting loss or gain from the change in fair value of the hedged item. If the hedged exposure is a cash flow exposure, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported initially as a component of other comprehensive income in the shareholder's equity section of the balance sheet and subsequently reclassified into earnings when the forecasted transaction affects earnings. Any amount excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness, as well as the ineffective portion of the gain or loss, is reported in earnings immediately. |
A derivative instrument qualifies as a hedge if all of the following tests are met: |
- The item to be hedged exposes the Company to price risk. |
- The derivative reduces the risk exposure and is designated as a hedge at the time the Company enters into the contract. |
- At the inception of the hedge and throughout the hedge period there is a high correlation between changes in the market value of the derivative instrument and the fair value of the underlying item being hedged. |
When the designated item associated with a derivative instrument matures, is sold, extinguished or terminated, derivative gains or losses are deferred and included in income in the same period that the underlying production or other contractual commitment is delivered. When a derivative instrument is associated with an anticipated transaction that is no longer expected to occur or if correlation no longer exists, the gain or loss on the derivative is reclassified from other comprehensive income and recognized currently in the results of operations. |
-22- |
Energy-Price Risk Management |
|||||
QMR held energy-price hedging contracts covering the price exposure for about 83.6 million Dth of gas and 1.6 million barrels of oil as of September 30, 2002. A year earlier QMR hedging contracts covered 69.1 million Dth of natural gas and 1.4 million barrels of oil. QMR does not hedge the price of natural gas liquids. |
|||||
A summary of the activity for the fair value of energy-price hedging contracts for the first nine months ended September 30, 2002, is below. The calculation is comprised of the valuation of financial and physical contracts. |
|||||
(In Thousands) |
|||||
Net fair value of energy hedging contracts outstanding at Dec 31, 2001 |
$ 50,897 |
||||
Contracts realized or otherwise settled |
(35,600) |
||||
Decline in energy prices on futures markets |
(25,364) |
||||
Net fair value of energy hedging contracts outstanding at Sept 30, 2002 |
$ (10,067) |
||||
A vintaging of energy-price hedging contracts as of September 30, 2002, is shown below. About 64% of those contracts will settle and be reclassified from other comprehensive amounts in the next 12 months. |
|||||
-23- |
(In Thousands) |
||||||||||
Maturity of contracts by Sept. 30, 2003 |
$ (6,442) |
|||||||||
Maturity of contracts between Oct. 1, 2003 and Sept. 30, 2004 |
(3,239) |
|||||||||
Maturity of contracts between Oct. 1, 2004 and Sept. 30, 2005 |
(331) |
|||||||||
Maturity of contracts between Oct. 1, 2005 and Sept. 30, 2008 |
(55) |
|||||||||
Fair value of energy hedging contracts outstanding at Sept. 30, 2002 |
$ (10,067) |
|||||||||
QMR's undiscounted mark-to-market valuation of financial gas and oil price-hedging contracts plus a sensitivity analysis follows: |
||||||||||
As of September 30, |
||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||||
(In Millions) |
||||||||||
Mark-to-market valuation - asset (liability) |
($10.1) |
$33.1 |
||||||||
Value if market prices of gas and oil decline by 10% |
(8.7) |
45.7 |
||||||||
Value if market prices of gas and oil increase by 10% |
(11.4) |
20.4 |
||||||||
The calculations reflect energy prices posted on the NYMEX, various "into the pipe" postings, and fixed prices on the indicated dates. These sensitivity calculations do not consider changes in the fair value of the corresponding scheduled physical transactions for price hedges on equity production (i.e., the correlation between the index price and the price to be realized for the physical delivery of gas or oil production), which should largely offset the change in value of the hedge contracts. |
||||||||||
Interest-Rate Risk Management |
||||||||||
As of September 30, 2002, Questar had $252.1 million of variable-rate long-term debt and $945.2 million of fixed-rate long-term debt. The book value of variable-rate long-term debt approximates fair value. An interest rate hedge on $100 million of variable-rate debt matured on September 30, 2002. |
||||||||||
Foreign Currency Risk Management |
||||||||||
QMR sold its foreign operations in the fourth quarter of 2002. The Company did not hedge the foreign currency exposure of its foreign operation's net assets and long-term debt. Long-term debt held by the foreign operation, amounting to US $61.1 million, was repaid with the proceeds of the sale of the foreign company. |
||||||||||
Forward-Looking Statements |
||||||||||
This report includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27(A) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21(E) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical facts included or incorporated by reference in this report, including, without limitation, statements regarding the Company's future financial position, business strategy, budgets, projected costs and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. In addition, forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "may", "will", "could", "expect", "intend", "project", "estimate", "anticipate", "believe", "forecast", or "continue" or the negative thereof or variations thereon or similar terminology. Although these statements are made in good faith and are reasonable representations of the Company's expected performance at the time, actual results may var y from management's stated expectations and projections due to a variety of factors. |
||||||||||
Important assumptions and other significant factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking statements include: |
||||||||||
-24- |
||||||||||
Changes in general economic conditions; |
||||||||||
Changes in gas and oil prices and supplies, competition, land-access and environmental issues; |
||||||||||
Changes in rate-regulatory policies; |
||||||||||
The regulation of the Wexpro settlement agreement; |
||||||||||
The availability of gas and oil properties for sale or for exploration; |
||||||||||
The creditworthiness of counterparties to hedging contracts; |
||||||||||
The rate of inflation, interest rates and debt ratings; |
||||||||||
The assumptions used in business combinations; |
||||||||||
The weather and other natural phenomena; |
||||||||||
The effect of environmental regulation; |
||||||||||
Changes in customers' credit ratings, including energy merchants; |
||||||||||
Competition from other forms of energy, other pipelines and storage facilities; |
||||||||||
The effect of accounting policies issued periodically by accounting standard-setting bodies; |
||||||||||
The adverse repercussions from terrorist attacks or acts of war; |
||||||||||
The adverse changes in the business or financial condition of the Company; and |
||||||||||
Lower credit ratings of Questar and its subsidiaries. |
||||||||||
Item 4. Controls and Procedures a. Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"). Based on such evaluation, such officers have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting them on a timely basis to material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, required to be included in the Company's reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act. b. Changes in Internal Controls. Since the Evaluation Date, there have not been any significant changes in the Company's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect such controls.
|
-25- |
Part II |
Item 1. Legal Proceedings. |
a. KN TransColorado, Inc. v. Questar Corp., No. 00CV129 (Dist. Ct. Colo.). As previously announced, the parties to this complex litigation executed a purchase agreement dated October 20, 2002. See Questar Pipeline Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 20, 2002. Under the terms of the purchase agreement, Questar Pipeline Company agreed to sell Questar TransColorado, Inc. ("QTC") to Kinder Morgan, Inc., and its affiliates (collectively "Kinder Morgan") for $105.5 million. QTC owns a 50 percent interest in the TransColorado pipeline project. Execution of the purchase agreement ended litigation between the parties. |
The acquisition is subject to the requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, and both parties have made the necessary filings with the Federal Trade Commission. The parties expect to close the acquisition, which is effective as of October 1, 2002, prior to the end of the year. |
b. Grynberg v. Questar Pipeline Co., No. 20010731-SC (Utah Sup. Ct.). The Utah Supreme Court has set a date of December 2, 2002, to hear oral arguments for the appeal filed by Jack Grynberg, an independent producer, after a Utah state district court judge granted defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint. See Questar's Form 10-Q Report for the second quarter of 2002, Item 1. Legal Proceedings, paragraph b., for a discussion of the case. |
c. United States ex rel. Grynberg v. Questar Corp., Civil No. 99 MD 1604, Consolidated Case MDL No. 1293 (D. Wyo.). By order dated October 9, 2002, the trial court in the consolidated Grynberg cases granted the motion filed by the Department of Justice ("Justice") to dismiss Grynberg's valuation claims from such cases. The judge agreed with Justice's position that Grynberg failed to offer material assistance to the government on these claims. (Justice is not a party to the cases against the Questar defendants, but is a party to some consolidated cases.) This order does not affect Grynberg's mismeasurement claims. See the Company's Form 10-Q Report for the second quarter of 2002, Item I. Legal Proceedings, paragraph c., for a discussion of the case. |
d. Bishop v. Questar Exploration and Production Co., No. 01-376 (Dist. Ct. Wyo.) and Bishop v. Questar Gas Co., No. 01-375 (Dist. Ct. Wyo.). These cases involving Questar Exploration and Production Company ("Questar E&P") and Wexpro Company ("Wexpro") have been settled. See the Company's Form 10-Q Report for the second quarter of 2002, Item 1. Legal Proceedings, paragraph g., for a discussion of the cases. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement, Questar E&P and Wexpro both agreed to escrow specified sums as payment for past royalty calculation claims and agreed to value future gas volumes for royalty calculation purposes using an average index price without any deductions for gathering. The settlement is subject to final approval of the class certification and the settlement terms. |
Item 5. Other Information |
||
a. The Company filed a shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 1, 2002. The Commission staff reviewed this document and the periodic reports of the Company and its reporting subsidiaries. As a result of this review process, the Company is making the following statements and disclosures that should be read in conjunction with the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. |
||
-26- |
||
Significant Customers. |
||
Questar Gas, in addition to serving over 735,000 residential and commercial customers, has several large transportation customers, including Gadsby plant operated by Scottish Power (electric utility) in Salt Lake City; the Kennecott copper processing operations, located in Salt Lake County, the Geneva Steel manufacturing plant and the mineral extraction operations of Magnesium Corporation of America in Tooele County, west of Salt Lake City. During 2001, these customers contributed $2.8 million of the $7.2 million revenues received by Questar Gas for transportation volumes. For the first nine months of 2002, these customers contributed $2.0 million of the $5.4 million revenues received by Questar Gas for transportation volumes. The Geneva Plant ceased operating early in 2002. |
||
Joint Venture Relationships. |
||
Questar itself does not have significant joint venture relationships. Questar Market Resources, Inc. ("QMR"), through its subsidiaries and Questar Pipeline, are involved in joint venture activities. |
||
QGM, a direct subsidiary of QMR, is one of two equal members in Rendezvous Gas Services, LLC, (Rendezvous) which is a joint venture organized to develop and operate new gathering and compression facilities in the Hoback Basin in southwestern Wyoming. Western Gas Resources is the other member. The Hoback Basin includes the Pinedale Anticline area in which Questar E&P and Wexpro have developed reserves as well as producing areas south of Pinedale. Rendezvous plans to deliver gas volumes from this area for processing and blending to the Blacks Fork plant in which QGM has a 50 percent interest, and to the Granger plant owned by an affiliate of Western Gas. |
||
As noted above, QGM has a 50 percent interest in the Blacks Fork plant. A subsidiary of El Paso Corporation owns the remaining 50 percent interest in the plant. The Blacks Fork partnership is not a material contract. |
||
QET, a direct subsidiary of QMR that is involved in energy marketing activities, has a 75 percent interest in the Clear Creek storage facility located in southwestern Wyoming. EnCana Corporation owns the remaining 25 percent. The operations of Clear Creek are consolidated with QET for financial reporting purposes. QET, in April of 2002, announced that it entered into a gas storage optimization agreement with Aquila Merchant Services, Inc., a subsidiary of Aquila Corporation, to manage commercial activities related to QET's contract for storage at the Clay Basin facility. The parties have terminated the contract. The Aquila agreement was not a material contract to QMR. |
||
As previously mentioned as of September 30, 2002, Questar Pipeline's subsidiary Questar TransColorado, Inc. was a 50 percent partner in TransColorado. This partnership was originally formed in 1990 to build and operate the TransColorado pipeline that commenced operations March 31, 1999. (The partnership agreement was subsequently amended in 1995 and 1997.) This pipeline extends from a point on Questar Pipeline's system 25 miles east of Rangely in northwestern Colorado and extends 292 miles to the Blanco hub in northwestern New Mexico. The partnership document does not constitute a material contract for Questar. |
||
As of September 30, 2002, Questar Pipeline had a 90 percent interest in and is the operating partner of Overthrust Pipeline Company ("Overthrust"), a general partnership that was organized in 1979 to construct, own and operate the Overthrust segment of Trailblazer Pipeline System ("Trailblazer"). The 88-mile Overthrust segment is the western-most of Trailblazer's three segments; Trailblazer itself is an 800-mile pipeline that transports gas from producing areas in the Rocky Mountains to the Midwest. The remaining 10 percent is owned by an affiliate of El Paso Corporation and was purchased by Questar in October 2002. The partnership document does not constitute a material contract for Questar. |
||
-27- |
||
Farm Out Activities. |
||
QMR, as part of its strategy to emphasize low-cost development drilling, will frequently "farm out" the right to drill wells on identified leasehold acreage. A farm out is an agreement commonly used in the oil and gas industry that grants another entity the right to earn a specified ownership percentage in exchange for taking the risk and developing the leasehold acreage. The percentage of ownership ranges from 50 to 100 percent depending on the commercial success of the project. |
||
The Company had a working interest in 337 gross wells in 2001, nine of which were drilled pursuant to farm out agreements wherein third parties paid a disproportionate share of the drilling cost and the Company retained a working interest. Five of these wells were completed as producers. The Company also farmed out 100% of its working interest in 33 wells, retaining a small overriding royalty interest in each well and in some instances a "back-in" working interest after the well achieves a certain financial threshold (for example, recovery of 100% of initial investment). |
||
Reserves. |
||
QMR's reserves do not include any reserves owned by third parties, even if the third parties acquired such reserves as a result of a farm out. QMR's reserves are reported on a net ownership position. |
||
Questar has consistently separated its disclosure of reserves owned by QMR and cost-of-service reserves developed by Wexpro. QMR does not include the cost-of-service reserves associated with properties operated by Wexpro in its reserve disclosures because Wexpro does not own such reserves. These cost of service reserves are disclosed in Note 14 to Questar's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. |
||
Reserves reported by QMR do not include any reserves attributable to third party royalty interests. Reserves are calculated and reported based on net revenue interests and include royalty interests owned by QMR. A royalty interest is held by the lessor that leases acreage in return for a specified percentage of the value of production from the acreage. QMR generally sells the royalty owner's share of production volumes, but does not own the reserves attributable to the royalty owner's interest. |
||
Working Interest, Pinedale. |
||
As previously reported, QMR through Questar E&P and Wexpro, have an average of 60 percent working interest in 14,800 acres in the Mesa Area of the Pinedale Anticline. The working interest ownership within the area varies in the range of 56% to 90%. QMR's 60 percent working interest is equal to a 47 percent net revenue interest. |
||
Cost of Service Definition. |
||
Wexpro conducts gas and oil development and production activities on certain producing properties located in the Rocky Mountain region under the terms of a settlement agreement. (The terms of the settlement agreement are described in Note 11 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 14 of the Company's 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K). The gas is often referred to as "cost of service." This term refers to Wexpro's legal entitlement to reimbursement of its costs and approved return on investment for operating the properties. Such gas volumes are reflected in Questar Gas's rates at cost-of-service prices, rather than market prices. |
||
Competition and Favorable Price Advantage. |
||
Questar Gas continues to enjoy a favorable price comparison with other energy sources used by or available to residential and commercial customers. Energy sources available to these customers include, electricity, oil, coal, propane and wood. This historic price advantage has permitted it to retain 90-95 percent of the residential space and water heating markets in its service area and to have close to 100 percent of the space heating and water heating offered to new homes within its service area that are connected to its system. |
||
-28- |
||
Operating Expenses. |
||
As previously reported (See "Operating Expenses" discussion under "Results of Operations," in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis, of the Company's 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K), QMR's expenses increased 34 percent in 2000 compared with 1999. One factor responsible for this increase was the settlement of a significant lawsuit disclosed in Item 3. Legal Proceedings, of the Company's 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Pursuant to the terms of a settlement agreement in the lawsuit, Bridenstine v. Kaiser-Francis Oil Company, Questar E&P and an unrelated party paid $22.5 million, with Questar E&P's portion being $16.5 million. The lawsuit was a class action lawsuit involving allegations that excessive transportation charges had been deducted from royalty payments. |
||
Operating Expenses. |
||
As previously reported (See "Operating Expenses" discussion under "Results of Operations," in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis, of the Company's 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K), QMR's expenses increased 34 percent in 2000 compared with 1999. One factor responsible for this increase was the settlement of a significant lawsuit disclosed in Item 3. Legal Proceedings, of the Company's 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Pursuant to the terms of a settlement agreement in the lawsuit, Bridenstine v. Kaiser-Francis Oil Company, Questar E&P and an unrelated party paid $22.5 million, with Questar E&P's portion being $16.5 million. The lawsuit was a class action lawsuit involving allegations that excessive transportation charges had been deducted from royalty payments. |
||
Interest and Other Income. |
||
Gains from selling non-strategic properties, those properties not considered a part of our primary business plan, amounted to a $21.8 million pretax gain in 2001 ($13.5 million after tax). QMR accounted for $13.9 million of these gains with $10.6 million attributable to the sale of oil and gas properties, primarily in Oklahoma and Texas. Questar Regulated Services had pretax gains of $5.3 million, $2.8 million of which resulted from the sale of surplus real estate. The Company constantly attempts to increase the efficiency of its investments by selling assets that do not generate a sufficient return on investment, are inefficient to operate, or are judged to be not necessary to support current operations or future growth. |
||
Market Resources, Exploration and Production. |
||
For 2002, QMR's capital expenditures forecast totals $190 million. Included in this forecast is $143 million for development drilling and $29 million for expansion of gas gathering capacity. Less than $3 million has been allocated to exploration activities. |
||
In the first nine months of 2002, QMR participated in a total of 224 gross wells (124 net). The net total included 109 in the Rocky Mountains, 12 in the midcontinent, and 3 in Canada. The drilling success rate on a net basis was 97%. |
||
Other Regulatory Assets. |
||
Gains and losses on the reacquisition of debt by rate-regulated affiliates are deferred and amortized as debt expense over the would-be remaining life of the retired debt or the life of the replacement debt in order to match regulatory treatment. The cost of the early retirement windows offered to employees of rate-regulated subsidiaries is capitalized and amortized over a five-year period in accordance with regulatory treatment. Rate-regulated operations record cumulative increases in deferred taxes as income taxes recoverable from customers. Production taxes on cost-of-service production are accrued when the gas is produced and recovered from customers when taxes are paid. The regulated entities recover costs but do not receive a return on these assets. A list of regulatory assets at December 31 follows: |
||
-29- |
2001 |
2000 |
|
(In Thousands) |
||
Cost of reacquired debt |
$15,955 |
$11,700 |
Early retirement costs |
11,435 |
14,798 |
Income taxes recoverable from customers |
5,557 |
6,903 |
Deferred production taxes |
4,328 |
3,166 |
Other |
709 |
1,079 |
$37,984 |
$37,646 |
|
|
||
Employee Pension Expense Assumptions. |
||
The liability discount rate for determining present value of future pension liability is based on the yield on long-term high quality bonds in effect at the end of each year. The year-end yield on AA/AAA bond index is provided to Questar by its consulting pension actuaries each year. The indicated discount rate will be reviewed again at the end of 2002. |
||
Employee Pension Expense Assumptions. |
||
The liability discount rate for determining present value of future pension liability is based on the yield on long-term high quality bonds in effect at the end of each year. The year-end yield on AA/AAA bond index is provided to Questar by its consulting pension actuaries each year. The indicated discount rate will be reviewed again at the end of 2002, but are advised by our actuaries that if the rate were to be reset today, no change would be indicated based on current market conditions. |
||
Questar's estimate of the long-term expected return on assets is based on data provided periodically by our pension asset consultant which indicates historical and projected returns on the major pension asset class and which is weighted to reflect Questar's policy for allocation of benefit plan assets between the various investment type classes. Questar's actuarial consultants also provide Questar with data regarding the range of return assumptions being employed by a universe of benefit plans which they periodically survey. Based on asset class return projections recently provided by our consultants, Questar's expected return on assets would likely decline from the 9.0% currently assumed to a return in the 7-8% range. The next formal return assumption determination will be made by Questar in early 2003 for use in establishing 2003 pension expense and will be based on market conditions and consu ltant recommendations at that time. |
||
-30- |
Earnings Per Share Calculation Excluding Goodwill Amortization. |
|||||
Following is a table showing earnings per share on a pro forma basis without the affect of goodwill. |
|||||
For the Year Ended |
|||||
December 31, |
|||||
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
|||
(In Thousands Except Per Share Amounts) |
|||||
Net income |
$158,186 |
$149,477 |
$96,852 |
||
Add back goodwill amortization |
2,224 |
1,653 |
44 |
||
Pro forma net income |
$160,410 |
$151,130 |
$96,896 |
||
Basic earnings per share |
|||||
Net income |
$ 1.95 |
$ 1.86 |
$ 1.17 |
||
Add back goodwill amortization |
0.03 |
0.02 |
|||
Pro earnings per basic share |
$ 1.98 |
$ 1.88 |
$ 1.17 |
||
Average basic shares outstanding |
81,097 |
80,412 |
82,547 |
||
Diluted earnings per share |
|||||
Net income |
$ 1.94 |
$ 1.85 |
$ 1.17 |
||
Add back goodwill amortization |
0.03 |
0.02 |
|||
Pro earnings per diluted shares |
$ 1.97 |
$ 1.87 |
$ 1.17 |
||
Average diluted shares outstanding |
81,658 |
80,915 |
82,676 |
||
-31- |
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K. |
Exhibit No. |
Exhibit |
12 |
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges |
99.1 |
Certification of Keith O. Rattie and S. E. Parks |
b. Questar did not file any Current Reports as Form 8-K during the quarter. |
-32- |
SIGNATURES |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. |
QUESTAR CORPORATION |
||
|
||
November 14, 2002 |
/s/Keith O. Rattie |
|
Keith O. Rattie |
||
|
||
November 14, 2002 |
/s/S. E. Parks |
|
S. E. Parks |
||
-33- |
CERTIFICATION |
I, Keith O. Rattie, certify that: |
1. |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Questar Corporation; |
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
4. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: |
a) |
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
b) |
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and |
c) |
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
a) |
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls that could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
b) |
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; |
6. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
|
|
||
November 14, 2002 |
By: /s/Keith O. Rattie |
||
Date |
Keith O. Rattie |
||
|
CERTIFICATION |
I, S. E. Parks, certify that: |
1. |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Questar Corporation; |
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
4. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: |
a) |
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
b) |
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and |
c) |
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
a) |
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls that could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
b) |
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; |
6. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
|
|
||
November 14, 2002 |
By: /s/S. E. Parks |
||
Date |
S. E. Parks |
||
|
List of Exhibits: |
Exhibit No. |
Exhibit |
12 |
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges |
99.1 |
Certification of Keith O. Rattie and S. E. Parks |
Exhibit 12 |
||||
Questar Corporation and Subsidiaries |
||||
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
||||
(Unaudited) |
||||
12 Months Ended |
||||
September 30, |
||||
2002 |
2001 |
|||
Earnings |
||||
Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of |
||||
accounting change |
$221,931 |
$256,653 |
||
Plus debt expense |
78,706 |
62,668 |
||
Plus allowance for borrowed funds used during construction |
||||
and capitalized interest |
2,565 |
4,145 |
||
Plus interest portion of rental expense |
2,457 |
2,504 |
||
Plus minority interest in income |
572 |
1,870 |
||
Less income from less than 50% owned affiliated companies |
(326) |
(698) |
||
Plus distributions from less than 50% owned affiliated |
||||
companies |
459 |
836 |
||
$306,364 |
$327,978 |
|||
Fixed Charges |
||||
Debt expense |
$78,706 |
$62,668 |
||
Plus allowance for borrowed funds used during construction |
||||
and capitalized interest |
2,565 |
4,145 |
||
Plus interest portion of rental expense |
2,457 |
2,504 |
||
$83,728 |
$69,317 |
|||
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
3.66 |
4.73 |
||
For purposes of this presentation, earnings represent income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change adjusted for fixed charges, equity in minority interest and cash earnings of less than 50% owned affiliates. Fixed charges consist of total interest charges (expensed and capitalized), amortization of debt issuance costs, and the interest portion of rental expense estimated at 50%. Income before income taxes and a cumulative effect includes Questar's share of pretax earnings of unconsolidated affiliates where Questar's ownership is 50% or more. Distributions from less than 50% owned affiliates are included in the calculation, while earnings from these same enterprises are excluded. |
|
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO |
|
||
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
November 14, 2002 |
/s/Keith O. Rattie |
|
Keith O. Rattie |
||
|
||
November 14, 2002 |
/s/S. E. Parks |
|
S. E. Parks |
||
This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |