UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2002
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number 1-11533
Parkway Properties, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland |
74-2123597 |
(State or other jurisdiction |
(I.R.S. Employer |
of incorporation or organization) |
Identification No.) |
One Jackson Place Suite 1000
188 East Capitol Street
Jackson, Mississippi 39201-2195
(Address of
principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(601) 948-4091
Registrant's telephone number:
www.pky.com
Registrant's
website:
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Stock, $.001 Par Value
8.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Stock $.001 Par Value
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [x] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of
delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part
III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form
10-K. Yes [x] No [
]
The aggregate market value of the voting
stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of March 1, 2003 was
$319,521,000.
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes [x] No [
]
State the aggregate market value of the
voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by
reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average
bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the
registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter: $315,989,000.
The
number of shares outstanding in the registrant's class of common stock as of
March 1, 2003 was 9,382,177.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions
of the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
are incorporated by reference into Part III.
PARKWAY
PROPERTIES, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
Page |
|
|
------ |
PART I. |
|
|
Item 1. |
Business........................................................................................................................ |
3 |
Item 2. |
Properties...................................................................................................................... |
7 |
Item 3. |
Legal Proceedings ........................................................................................................ |
12 |
Item 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.................................................... |
12 |
|
|
|
PART II. |
|
|
Item 5. |
Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters...................... |
12 |
Item 6. |
Selected Financial Data................................................................................................. |
14 |
Item 7. |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
15 |
Item 7A. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.......................................... |
25 |
Item 8. |
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.................................................................... |
25 |
Item 9. |
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures |
50 |
|
|
|
PART III. |
|
|
Item 10. |
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.......................................................... |
50 |
Item 11. |
Executive Compensation................................................................................................. |
50 |
Item 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management................................ |
50 |
Item 13. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions................................................................. |
50 |
|
|
|
PART IV. |
|
|
Item 14. |
Controls and Procedures............................................................................................. |
51 |
Item 15. |
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K.................................. |
51 |
|
|
|
SIGNATURES |
|
|
Authorized Signatures........................................................................................... |
53 |
|
|
|
|
CERTIFICATIONS |
|
|
Section 302 Certifications.................................................................................... |
54 |
PART I
ITEM 1. Business.
General Development of Business
Overview
Parkway Properties, Inc.
("Parkway" or the "Company") is a real estate investment
trust ("REIT") specializing in the operations, acquisition,
ownership, management, and leasing of office properties. The Company is self-administered, in that it
provides its own investment and administrative services internally through its
own employees. The Company is also
self-managed, as it internally provides the management and maintenance services
that its properties require through its own employees, such as property
managers and engineers and in some cases, leasing professionals. The Company is geographically focused on the
Southeastern and Southwestern United States and Chicago. Parkway and its predecessors have been public
companies engaged in the real estate business since 1971, and its present
senior management has been with Parkway since the 1980's. The management team has had experience
managing a public real estate company through all phases of the real estate business
cycle. At March 1, 2003, Parkway owned
or had an interest in 56 office properties located in eleven states with an
aggregate of approximately 9.9 million square feet of leasable space.
Parkway evaluates each individual
asset considering a number of factors such as current market rents, vacancy
rates and capitalization rates. As part
of this strategy, since July 1995, the Company has (i) completed the
acquisition of 63 office properties, encompassing 10.5 million net rentable
square feet, for a total purchase price of $991 million; (ii) sold or is in the
process of selling all of its non-core assets; (iii) sold 11 office properties,
encompassing approximately 1.1 million net rentable square feet primarily in
markets that posed increasing risks and redeployed these funds; (iv) sold two
joint venture interests in two office properties encompassing 1.6 million net
rentable square feet; and (v) implemented self-management and self-leasing at
most of its properties to promote a focus on tenant retention and superior
service in meeting the needs of its tenants.
Parkway defines total investment
in office properties as purchase price plus estimated closing costs and
anticipated capital expenditures during the first 12 months of ownership for
tenant improvements, commissions, upgrades and capital improvements to bring
the building up to the Company's standards.
Until December 31, 1996, Parkway
operated as a real estate operating company.
For the taxable years 1995 and 1996, Parkway paid virtually no federal
income taxes ($64,000 in 1995 and none in 1996) primarily because Parkway had
certain net operating losses ("NOLs") to shelter most of Parkway's
income from such taxes. However, the
increase in the number of outstanding shares of common stock which resulted
from a common stock private placement in June 1996 and certain business
combination transactions in 1994 and 1995 caused the use of Parkway's NOLs to
be significantly limited in any one year. The Company anticipated that its
taxable income would increase significantly following the implementation of its
strategy of focused investment in office properties. Accordingly, Parkway's Board of Directors determined that it was
in the best interests of Parkway and its stockholders to elect to qualify
Parkway as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code for the taxable year
beginning January 1, 1997, which allows Parkway to be generally exempt from
federal income taxes even if its NOLs are limited or exhausted, provided it
meets various REIT requirements. The
Company's taxable income increased from $8.9 million in 1997 to approximately
$37 million in 2002 before utilization of NOLs. At December 31, 2002, the Company had NOL carryforwards for
federal income tax purposes of approximately $9.1 million and expects to
utilize this remaining NOL by December 2007.
For each year from 1997 through 2002, distributions of taxable income in
the form of dividends as required by the Internal Revenue Code were made.
Self-Management and Third Party Management
The Company self-manages
approximately 99.2% of its current portfolio on a net rentable square footage
basis. In addition, the Company
implemented self-leasing for renewals and currently self-leases approximately
82.5% of its portfolio on a net rentable square footage basis. For new tenant leasing, which is a small
portion of our business, we fully cooperate with the third party brokerage
community. The Company benefits from a
fully integrated management infrastructure, provided by its wholly-owned management
subsidiary, Parkway Realty Services LLC ("Parkway Realty"). The Company believes self-management results
in better customer service, higher tenant retention and allows the Company to
enhance stockholder value through the application of its hands-on operating
style. The Company believes that its
focus on tenant retention will benefit the Company and its stockholders by
maintaining a stabilized revenue stream and avoiding higher capital
expenditures and leasing commissions associated with new leases. In order to self-manage properties, the
Company seeks to reach critical mass in terms of square footage. Critical mass
varies from market to market and is generally defined by the Company as owning
or managing a minimum of 250,000 square feet.
The Company is considering the sale of its properties that are not
self-managed because the inability to self-manage these properties limits the
Company's ability to apply its hands-on operating strategy. In addition to its
owned properties, Parkway Realty currently manages and/or leases approximately
2.2 million net rentable square feet for third-party owners (including joint
venture interests). The Company also
intends to expand its third party fee business.
In addition to direct real estate
acquisitions, Parkway's investment strategy includes the consummation of
business combination transactions with other public real estate and financial
companies which Parkway deems to be undervalued. In evaluating a company to determine if it is undervalued,
Parkway traditionally looks at the value the public market is placing on its
assets versus what value the private market would pay for those same assets.
Our preference is for office companies or those with a strong office component. We then pursue these acquisitions by
acquiring common stock, which is typically listed on one of the major national
stock exchanges. Since 1979, Parkway
has completed eight such business combinations. Management may pursue similar business combination transactions
on a selected basis in order to enhance stockholder value.
Joint Ventures
Parkway intends to form joint
ventures or partnerships with select investors. During 2000, the Company formed a venture partnership with a
division of Investcorp International, Inc. ("Investcorp") for the purposes of
acquiring approximately $100 million in Central Business District (downtown)
assets in the Southeastern and Southwestern United States and Chicago. Under the terms of the joint venture agreement,
Parkway will operate, manage, and lease the properties on a day-to-day basis,
provide acquisition and construction management services to the joint venture,
and receive fees for providing these services.
The joint venture will arrange first mortgage financing which will
approximate 70% of the value of each office asset purchased. This debt will be non-recourse, property
specific debt. Investcorp will provide
70 to 75% of the joint venture capital with Parkway to provide the balance,
with distributions being made pro rata.
During 2002, Parkway entered into a
joint venture agreement with respect to the 233 North Michigan building in Chicago.
On May 30, 2002, Parkway sold a 70% interest in its investment in
Parkway 233 North Michigan LLC, a subsidiary limited liability company that
owns the 233 North Michigan Avenue building, to an affiliate of Investcorp for
a price equal to approximately 70% of the Company's original purchase price of
the property plus all capital costs since it acquired the property in June
2001. Parkway continues to provide
management and leasing for the building on a day-to-day basis. In connection with the sale, Parkway
recognized a $250,000 acquisition fee in accordance with the terms of the joint
venture agreement. The Company recorded
a loss on the sale of the 70% interest of $269,000.
Recent Developments
Effective January 6, 2003, the
Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of
$50 million which fixed 30-day LIBOR at 1.545%. The agreement, which matures December 31, 2003, effectively fixes
the interest rate at 2.92% on $50 million of variable rate borrowing.
On February 11, 2003, Parkway
purchased the Citrus Center, a 258,000 square foot office building in Orlando,
Florida, for $32,000,000 plus $2,590,000 in closing costs and anticipated first
year capital expenditures. The purchase
was funded by the assumption of an existing first mortgage on the building of
$19,695,000 and $12,305,000 in cash, which represents the investment of the
remaining proceeds from the 233 North Michigan joint venture with Investcorp,
which was completed in May 2002. The
non-recourse mortgage with Legg Mason Real Estate Services, Inc. has a fixed
interest rate of 7.91% and matures August 1, 2007.
On March 6, 2003, Parkway sold a 70%
interest in the Viad Corporate Center in Phoenix, Arizona to Investcorp (the
"Viad Joint Venture") for a price of $42 million. Parkway continues to provide management and
leasing services for the building. In
connection with the sale, Parkway will recognize an acquisition fee of $175,000
in the first quarter of 2003. The
estimated gain on this transaction is approximately $900,000.
Simultaneous with the sale, the Viad
Joint Venture closed a $42.5 million mortgage with Bear Stearns. The non-recourse first mortgage is
interest-only for a term of two years with three one-year extension
options. Interest due under the
mortgage will be floating rate, which at the time of closing was approximately
4.26%. Parkway received net cash proceeds
from this transaction of approximately $54 million and will use the proceeds to
purchase new properties and to reduce short-term borrowings under the Company's
lines of credit. The joint venture will
be accounted for using the equity method of accounting, and the Company's pro
rata share of debt from the joint venture will be included in the calculation
of the ratio of debt to total market capitalization.
Business Objectives and Strategy of the
Company
Overview
Parkway's business objective is
to maximize total return to stockholders over time primarily through increases
in dividends and share price appreciation.
During 2002, Parkway distributed $2.56 per share in dividends to common
stockholders, representing a 4.5% increase over the 2001 dividends distributed
of $2.45 per common share.
Distributions in 2002 of $2.56 per share represent a payout of 55.2% of
the Company's funds from operations ("FFO") for the year. The Company increased its dividend in 2002
in order to distribute all of its REIT taxable income. To maintain qualification as a REIT, the
Company must distribute to stockholders at least 90% of taxable income,
excluding net capital gains.
Parkway's operating philosophy is
based on the premise that we are in the customer retention business. Parkway retains its customers by continually
focusing on operations at its office properties. We believe in providing superior customer service; hiring, training,
retaining and empowering each employee; creating an environment of open
communication both internally and with our stockholders; and simplicity. We will strive to maximize our stockholders
returns by setting, implementing and achieving goals, which increase
profitability, dividends and stock price, while managing risks. The Company seeks investments where our
operational expertise can add value through direct management, a hands-on,
service oriented operating philosophy and innovation. The Company will invest directly in properties in the form of
equity ownership. In some instances the
Company may take a minority interest in the ownership structure, such as a
joint venture format, but will maintain control of the operations, as we
believe this is where real estate value is created. These investments may additionally include acquiring equity
positions in private or publicly-traded real estate companies.
Strategic Plans
For many years, Parkway has been
engaged in a process of strategic planning and goal setting. The material goals and objectives of
Parkway's earlier strategic plans have been achieved, and have benefited
Parkway's stockholders through increased FFO and dividend payments per
share. In 1998, Parkway adopted a
strategic plan that set as its goal to increase Parkway's FFO per basic share
without the issuance of new equity. The
review, accountability and reward of the plan aligned management and
stockholder interests. The goal of the
strategic plan was to increase Parkway's FFO per basic share to $5.00 (before
expense accruals for restricted share grants tied to its accomplishment) in 50
months (i.e., the end of 2002); hence the plan was referred to as the "5 in
50 Plan." In 2000, the
benchmark was raised to the new basic FFO per share of $5.23, a 5% increase
over the previously disclosed goal of $5.00 due to the inadvertent benefit of
the issuance of convertible preferred stock in 2001. The plan set goals, assigned responsibility for the attainment of
such goals to specific Parkway officers, and provided for follow-up evaluations
to determine whether the officers responsible for the attainment of each goal
were moving toward success. The major goals included realizing the embedded
rental rate growth in Parkway's existing portfolio of office properties,
investing $50 million per year (for a total of $200 million) at a positive
spread of 250 basis points over the long-term cost of debt, selling Parkway's
non-earning assets and re-deploying the proceeds in higher yielding assets,
increasing the overall occupancy of Parkway's office portfolio, and taking numerous
other actions to generate additional cash flow from Parkway's properties. December 31, 2002 marked the end of the 5
in 50 Plan, and the Company was pleased to announce the accomplishment
of the plan. The Company's actual FFO
per basic share before the amortization of incentive compensation in 2002 was
$5.35, which is $.12 or 2.3% greater than the stated goal of $5.23 per basic
share.
Effective January 1, 2003, the
Company adopted a new, three-year strategic plan referred to as VALUE2 (Value
Square). This plan reflects the
employees' commitment to create value for its shareholders while holding firm
to the core values as espoused in the Parkway Commitment to Excellence. The Company plans to create value by Venturing
with best partners, Asset recycling, Leverage neutral growth, Uncompromising
focus on operations and providing an Equity return to its shareholders
that is 10% greater than that of its peer group, the National Association of
Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT") office index. Equity return is defined as growth in FFO
per diluted share.
Operating Properties
Parkway generally seeks to
acquire well-located Class A, A- or B+ (as classified within their respective
markets) multi-story office buildings which are located in primary or secondary
markets in the Southeastern and Southwestern United States and Chicago, ranging
in size from 100,000 to 1,000,000 net rentable square feet and which have
current and projected occupancy levels in excess of 70% and adequate parking to
accommodate full occupancy. Office
properties are designated Class A, A- or B+ based on a combination of factors
including rent, building finishes, system standards and efficiency, building
amenities, location/accessibility and market perception. Class A properties represent the most
prestigious buildings competing for premier office users with rents above
average for the area. These buildings
generally have high quality standard finishes, state of the art systems, exceptional
accessibility and a definite market presence.
Class B office buildings compete for a wide range of users with rents in
the average range for the area.
Building finishes are fair to good for the area and systems are
adequate, but the building does not compete with Class A at the same price. The Company targets buildings which are
occupied by a major tenant (or tenants) (e.g., a tenant that accounts for at
least 30% of the building's total rental revenue and has at least five years
remaining on its lease). Parkway's
focus on new property acquisitions will be on higher barrier-to-entry
sub-markets in both central business districts and suburban markets. Parkway strives to purchase office buildings
at minimum initial unleveraged annual yields on its total investment of 9.5%
for urban assets. The Company defines
initial unleveraged yield as net operating income ("NOI") divided by
total investment (as previously defined), where NOI represents budgeted cash
operating income for the current year at current occupancy rates and at rental
rates currently in place with no adjustments for anticipated expense savings,
increases in rental rates, additional leasing or straight line rent. Leases that expire during the year are
assumed to renew at market rates unless interviews with tenants during pre-purchase
due diligence indicate a likelihood that a tenant will not renew. In markets
where the Company self-manages its properties, NOI also includes the net
management fee expected to be earned during the year. The Company also generally seeks to acquire properties whose
total investment per net rentable square foot is at least 20% below estimated
replacement cost and whose current rental rates are at or below market rental
rates.
While the Company seeks to acquire properties which meet all of the acquisition criteria, specific property acquisitions are evaluated individually and may fail to meet one or more of the acquisition criteria at the date of purchase. Since January 1, 2002, the Company has acquired six office properties with approximately 1.3 million net rentable square feet for a total purchase price of $130 million, or approximately $100 per net rentable square foot. The properties purchased are located in the central business district and suburban market in Phoenix, the suburban market in Houston and the central business district in Orlando. Consistent with the qualification requirements of a REIT, the Company intends to hold and operate its portfolio of office buildings for investment purposes, but may determine to sell properties that no longer meet its investment criteria.
Real Estate Equity Securities
In addition to investing in office
properties, Parkway seeks to purchase common stock of other REITs that meet
certain criteria. This program is
referred to as the REIT Significant Value Program or "RSVP". The Company views the purchase of
publicly-traded real estate equity securities to be an alternative to "fee
simple" transactions for purchasing quality assets at attractive
prices. The existence of a sustainable
dividend provides a yield on the investment while the Company positions itself
for direct involvement.
The general criteria for purchase
includes strategic fit with Parkway with a preference to office, mixed
office/industrial, diversified or special situations with
office, the ability for Parkway's direct involvement to add value to the
REIT, discounts to net asset value
(NAV) generally 20% or greater, sustainable dividend yields of 8% or
greater, acceptable debt levels as measured by interest and fixed charge coverage
ratios and accretive investment economics. All REITs in which Parkway makes an investment will be approved
by the Parkway Board of Directors.
Although we currently have no investments, we will continue to pursue
opportunities in the public market in accordance with the RSVP plan as
conditions warrant.
Stock Repurchase Plan
The Company has been engaged in
the purchase of its outstanding common stock since June 1998. Given the fluctuations in price of the
Company's public equity without a corresponding change in valuation of the
underlying real estate assets, the Company believes a well-executed repurchase
program can add significant stockholder value.
During 2002, the Company repurchased 14,100 shares of its common stock
at an average cost of $30.08 per share.
Since June 1998, the Company has purchased a total of 2,141,593 shares
of its common stock, which represents approximately 19.3% of the Company stock
outstanding when the buyback program was initiated on June 30, 1998. The Company has the authority to purchase an
additional 485,900 shares under its existing authorization from its Board of
Directors. When considering
repurchasing shares, the Company evaluates the following items: impact on the Company's VALUE2 Plan,
discount to net asset value; implied capitalization rate; implied value per
square foot; impact on liquidity of common stock; and other investment
alternatives that are available with a similar risk profile (capital
allocation).
Management Team
Parkway's management
team consists of experienced office property specialists with proven
capabilities in office property (i) operations; (ii) leasing; (iii) management;
(iv) acquisition/disposition; (v) financing; (vi) capital allocation; and (vii)
re-positioning. The management team
also has considerable experience in evaluating and completing mergers and/or
acquisitions of other REITs. Since
1979, the Company has completed eight such business combinations. The Company believes these capabilities will
allow Parkway to continue to create office property value in all phases of the
real estate cycle. These capabilities
are enhanced by the fee based real estate services provided through Parkway's
wholly owned subsidiary, Parkway Realty Services. Parkway will continue its initiative to increase Parkway Realty
Services through the acquisition of brokerage companies and through joint
ventures. Parkway's ten senior officers
have an average of over 20 years of real estate industry experience, and have
worked together at Parkway for an average of over 14 years. Management has developed a highly
service-oriented operating culture and believes that its focus on operations,
proactive leasing, property management and asset management activities will
result in higher tenant retention and occupancy and will continue to translate
into enhanced stockholder value.
Financing Strategy
The Company expects to continue
seeking fixed rate, non-recourse mortgage financing at terms ranging from ten
to thirty years on select office building investments as additional capital is
needed. The Company plans to maintain a
ratio of debt to total market capitalization from 25% to 50% although such
ratio may from time to time temporarily exceed 50%, especially when the Company
has incurred significant amounts of short-term debt in connection with
acquisitions. In addition, volatility
in the price of the Company's common stock may result in a debt to total market
capitalization ratio exceeding 50% from time to time. The Company monitors interest and fixed charge coverage
ratios. See Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Financial Condition." Parkway has no present plans to issue senior
securities. Should the opportunity
present itself, Parkway has the ability to issue modest amounts of common stock
periodically through its dividend reinvestment plan.
Parkway may, in appropriate circumstances, acquire one or more properties in exchange for Parkway's equity securities. Parkway may provide financing in connection with sales of property if market conditions so
require, but it does not presently intend to make other loans. Parkway has no set policy as to the amount or percentage of its assets which may be invested in any specific property. Rather than a specific policy, Parkway evaluates each property in terms of whether and to what extent the property meets Parkway's investment criteria and strategic objectives. Parkway has no present intentions of underwriting securities of other issuers. The strategies and policies set forth above were determined, and are subject to review by, Parkway's Board of Directors which may change such strategies or policies based upon their evaluation of the state of the real estate market, the performance of Parkway's assets, capital and credit market conditions, and other relevant factors. Parkway provides annual reports to its stockholders that contain financial statements audited by Parkway's independent public accountants.
Dispositions
Parkway has also pursued a strategy
of liquidating its non-core assets and office building investments that no
longer meet the Company's investment criteria and/or the Company has determined
value will be maximized by selling and redeploying the proceeds. The Company
routinely evaluates changes in market conditions that indicate an opportunity
or need to sell properties within those markets in order to maximize
shareholder value and allocate capital judiciously.
Since January 1, 1995, Parkway has sold
non-core assets with a book value of approximately $45 million for
approximately $68 million, resulting in an aggregate gain for financial
reporting purposes of approximately $23 million. The book value of all remaining non-office building real estate
assets and mortgage loans, all of which are for sale, was approximately $4.4
million as of December 31, 2002.
Since January 1, 1998, the Company
has sold 11 office properties, encompassing approximately 1.1 million net
rentable square feet for net proceeds of $101 million, resulting in aggregate
gains for financial reporting purposes of $13 million. In 2002, the Company sold one office
property in Indianapolis, Indiana, and in 2001, the Company sold one office
property in Birmingham, Alabama. The
decision to sell these assets was based on the fact that they were suburban and
were neither self-managed nor self-leased.
Currently, the Company is also considering the sale of its property in
Greenville, South Carolina, primarily because the Company does not own
sufficient office space in this market to justify self-management and
self-leasing. These investment
decisions will be based upon the Company's analysis of existing markets and
competing investment opportunities.
Administration
The Company is
self-administered and self-managed and maintains its principal executive
offices in Jackson, Mississippi. As of
March 1, 2003, the Company had 220 employees.
The operations of the Company are
conducted from approximately 13,000 square feet of office space located at 188
East Capitol Street, One Jackson Place, Suite 1000, Jackson, Mississippi. The building is owned by Parkway and is
leased by Parkway at market rental rates.
Parkway's press releases, Securities and Exchange Commission filings,
financial information and additional information about the Company are
available on the Company's website at www.pky.com.
ITEM 2. Properties.
General
The Company operates and invests
principally in office properties in the Southeastern and Southwestern United
States and Chicago, but is not limited to any specific geographical region or
property type. As of March 1, 2003, the
Company owned or had an interest in 56 office properties comprising approximately
9.9 million square feet of office space located in eleven states.
In addition, the Company has an
investment in the Toyota Center, formerly known as the Moore Building, which is
a historic renovation adjacent to the Triple-A baseball stadium complex in
downtown Memphis. The Toyota Center was
originally constructed in 1913 and consists of approximately 174,000 rentable
square feet. The Company constructed a
multi-level, 770-space parking garage to accommodate the building and stadium
parking needs. This building is owned
by Moore Building Associates LP (the "Partnership") and an
institutional investor, Banc of America Historic Ventures, LLC
("BOA") with the Company's ownership interest being less than
1%. At December 31, 2002, the note
receivable from the Partnership totaled $5,996,000.
Property acquisitions in 2002, 2001
and 2000 were funded through a variety of sources, including:
a. Cash reserves and cash
generated from operating activities,
b. Sales of non-core assets,
c. Sales of office properties,
d. Sale of a joint venture
interest,
e. Sales of investments in equity
securities of other REITs,
f. Fixed rate, non-recourse
mortgage financing at terms ranging from 10 to 20 years,
g. Assumption of existing fixed
rate, non-recourse mortgages on properties purchased,
h. Sales of Parkway preferred
stock, and
i. Advances on bank lines of
credit.
Office Buildings
Other than as discussed under
"Item 1. Business", the Company intends to hold and operate its
portfolio of office buildings for investment purposes. The Company does not propose any program for
the renovation, improvement or development of any of the office buildings,
except as called for under the renewal of existing leases or the signing of new
leases or improvements necessary to upgrade recent acquisitions to the
Company's operating standards. All such
improvements are expected to be financed by cash flow from the portfolio of
office properties and advances on bank lines of credit.
In the opinion of management, all properties are adequately covered by insurance. This is an area to which management has devoted a great deal of time and attention following the unfortunate events of September 11, 2001.
All office building investments
compete for tenants with similar properties located within the same market
primarily on the basis of location, rent charged, services provided and the
design and condition of the improvements.
The Company also competes with other REITs, financial institutions, pension
funds, partnerships, individual investors and others when attempting to acquire
office properties.
The following table sets forth
certain information about office properties the Company owned or had an
interest in as of January 1, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
% of |
|
|
Number |
Total Net |
% of |
Average |
Market |
Leases |
% |
|
Of |
Rentable |
Total Net |
Rent Per |
Rent Per |
Expiring |
Leased |
|
Office |
Square Feet |
Rentable |
Square |
Square |
In |
As of |
Location |
Properties(1) |
(in thousands) |
Feet |
Foot (2) |
Foot (3) |
2003 (4) |
1/1/2003 |
--------------------- |
--------------- |
--------------- |
----------- |
----------- |
----------- |
----------- |
------------- |
Houston, TX |
14 |
2,102 |
21.8% |
$18.23 |
$17.69 |
9.9% |
94.1% |
Chicago, IL |
1 |
1,068 |
11.1% |
31.93 |
32.39 |
0.5% |
90.3% |
Columbia, SC |
3 |
872 |
9.1% |
16.31 |
16.64 |
11.9% |
94.5% |
Jackson, MS |
5 |
839 |
8.7% |
17.76 |
18.06 |
23.3% |
94.7% |
Memphis, TN |
3 |
669 |
7.0% |
17.52 |
16.08 |
11.5% |
87.6% |
Atlanta, GA |
7 |
601 |
6.2% |
16.50 |
17.46 |
11.3% |
96.7% |
Phoenix, AZ |
2 |
585 |
6.1% |
24.79 |
20.00 |
9.9% |
92.8% |
Knoxville, TN |
2 |
532 |
5.5% |
15.51 |
16.00 |
18.6% |
93.1% |
Richmond, VA |
6 |
498 |
5.2% |
17.09 |
15.87 |
14.6% |
91.2% |
Nashville, TN |
1 |
428 |
4.5% |
16.07 |
16.00 |
1.2% |
85.7% |
Chesapeake, VA |
3 |
386 |
4.0% |
17.16 |
15.06 |
21.0% |
84.8% |
St. Petersburg, FL |
2 |
325 |
3.4% |
17.54 |
17.36 |
21.7% |
96.4% |
Winston-Salem, NC |
1 |
239 |
2.5% |
18.03 |
20.00 |
0.0% |
97.5% |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL |
2 |
215 |
2.2% |
21.18 |
20.41 |
11.8% |
98.0% |
Charlotte, NC |
1 |
187 |
1.9% |
15.61 |
15.50 |
11.4% |
88.8% |
All Others |
2 |
79 |
0.8% |
11.54 |
10.53 |
1.9% |
61.2% |
|
----- |
------- |
---------- |
-------- |
-------- |
-------- |
-------- |
|
55 |
9,625 |
100.0% |
$19.36 |
$18.92 |
11.4% |
92.3% |
|
=== |
===== |
====== |
===== |
===== |
===== |
===== |
(1) Includes 53 office properties owned directly; a
32,000 square foot office property in which the Company owns a 50% interest
located in New Orleans, Louisiana; and a 1,068,000 square foot office property
in which the Company owns a 30% interest located in Chicago, Illinois.
(2) Average rent per square foot is defined as the
weighted average current gross rental rate including expense escalations for
leased office space in the building as of January 1, 2003.
(3) Estimated average market rent per square foot is
based upon information obtained from (i) the Company's own experience in leasing
space at the properties; (ii) leasing agents in the relevant markets with
respect to quoted rental rates and completed leasing transactions for comparable
properties in the relevant markets; and (iii)
publicly available data with respect thereto. Estimated average market rent is weighted by the net rentable square feet expiring in each property.
(4) The percentage of leases expiring in 2003 represents
the ratio of square feet under leases expiring in 2003 divided by total net
rentable square feet.
The following table sets forth
scheduled lease expirations for properties owned as of January 1, 2003 for leases
executed as of January 1, 2003, assuming no tenant exercises renewal options:
|
|
Net |
|
Annualized |
Wghtd Avg |
Wghtd Est |
|
|
Rentable |
Percent of |
Rental |
Expiring Gross |
Avg Market |
Year of |
Number |
Square Feet |
Total Net |
Amount |
Rental Rate Per |
Rent Per Net |
Lease |
of |
Expiring |
Rentable |
Expiring (1) |
Net Rentable |
Rentable |
Expiration |
Leases |
(in thousands) |
Square Feet |
(in thousands) |
Square Foot (2) |
Square Foot (3) |
-------------- |
----------- |
---------------- |
--------------- |
---------------- |
----------------- |
---------------- |
2003 |
266 |
1,092 |
11.3% |
$ 19,853 |
$18.18 |
$17.03 |
2004 |
201 |
1,208 |
12.5% |
21,524 |
17.81 |
17.11 |
2005 |
222 |
1,518 |
15.8% |
27,287 |
17.98 |
17.57 |
2006 |
115 |
993 |
10.3% |
19,778 |
19.92 |
18.22 |
2007 |
121 |
892 |
9.3% |
16,139 |
18.10 |
17.07 |
Thereafter |
129 |
3,183 |
33.1% |
67,390 |
21.17 |
21.64 |
|
------ |
------ |
-------- |
---------- |
-------- |
-------- |
|
1,054 |
8,886 |
92.3% |
$171,971 |
$19.36 |
$18.92 |
|
==== |
==== |
===== |
====== |
===== |
===== |
(1) Annualized rental amount expiring is defined as net rentable square feet expiring multiplied by the weighted average expiring annual rental rate per net rentable square foot.
(2) Weighted average expiring gross rental rate is the
weighted average rental rate including expense escalations for office space.
(3) Estimated average market rent is based upon
information obtained from (i) the Company's own experience in leasing space at
the properties: (ii) leasing agents in the relevant markets with respect to
quoted rental rates and completed leasing transactions for comparable properties
in the relevant markets; and (iii) publicly available data with respect
thereto. Estimated average market rent
is weighted by the net rentable square feet expiring in each property.
The Company has one non-recourse
first mortgage note payable with a principal balance greater than 10% of its
assets. The lender is Teachers
Insurance and Annuity Association of America ("TIAA Mortgage"), and the loan
totals $78,051,000 at December 31, 2002.
The TIAA Mortgage is secured by 12 properties with a carrying amount of
$157,620,000. The TIAA Mortgage has a
fixed interest rate of 6.945% and matures July 1, 2008 with payments based on a
15 year amortization.
Other fixed-rate mortgage notes
payable total $131,695,000 at December 31, 2002 and are secured by 13
properties in various markets with interest rates ranging from 7.00% to
8.375%. Maturity dates on these
mortgage notes payable range from July 2006 to October 2019 on 12 to 30 year
amortizations. See Note G to the
consolidated financial statements.
The majority of the Company's fixed
rate secured debt contains prepayment provisions based on the greater of a
yield maintenance penalty or 1.0% of the outstanding loan amount. The yield maintenance penalty essentially
compensates the lender for the difference between the fixed rate under the loan
and the yield that the lender would receive if the lender reinvested the
prepaid loan balance in U.S. Treasury Securities with a similar maturity as the
loan.
Customers
The office properties are leased
to approximately 1,054 customers, which are in a wide variety of industries
including banking, professional services (including legal, accounting, and
consulting), energy, financial services and telecommunications. The following table sets forth information
concerning the 25 largest customers of the properties owned directly or through
joint ventures as of January 1, 2003 (in thousands, except square foot data):
|
|
Annualized |
|
Lease |
|
Square |
Rental |
|
Expiration |
Customer |
Feet |
Revenue (1) |
Office Property |
Date |
----------------------------------------------- |
------------ |
---------------- |
------------------------ |
----------- |
Government Services Administration (GSA)... |
309,589 |
$ 3,787 |
(2) |
(2) |
Bank of America, NA................................... |
274,316 |
3,147 |
(3) |
(3) |
South Carolina State Government.................. |
236,770 |
4,040 |
(4) |
(4) |
Branch Banking & Trust (BB&T).................. |
201,006 |
3,598 |
BB&T Financial Center |
12/15 |
Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc.................. |
198,441 |
4,015 |
Morgan Keegan Tower |
09/07 |
WorldCom, Inc. ........................................... |
184,445 |
3,064 |
(5) |
(5) |
Nabors Industries/Nabors Corporate Services |
170,627 |
3,335 |
One Commerce Green |
12/05 |
United Healthcare Services............................ |
167,673 |
1,428 |
233 North Michigan |
11/09 |
Viad Corporation......................................... |
159,299 |
4,794 |
Viad Corporate Center |
(6) |
Schlumberger Technology............................. |
155,324 |
2,715 |
Schlumberger |
04/07 |
Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company.... |
137,471 |
2,314 |
400 North Belt |
12/06 |
Florida Power Corporation........................... |
133,279 |
2,341 |
Central Station |
05/13 |
Young & Rubicam........................................ |
122,078 |
1,245 |
233 North Michigan |
11/11 |
The Dial Corporation..................................... |
116,918 |
3,117 |
Viad Corporate Center |
08/06 |
Lynk Systems, Inc....................................... |
107,118 |
1,362 |
Falls Pointe, Roswell North |
(7) |
First Tennessee Bank, NA.............................. |
101,400 |
1,687 |
First Tennessee Plaza |
09/14 |
MeadWestvaco Corporation.......................... |
100,457 |
1,708 |
Westvaco Building |
01/06 |
Boult, Cummings, Conners, & Berry, PLLC... |
98,813 |
2,098 |
Bank of America Plaza |
(8) |
DHL Airways............................................. |
98,649 |
1,887 |
One Commerce Green |
11/04 |
PGS Tensor Geophysical, Inc....................... |
91,960 |
1,646 |
Tensor Building |
03/05 |
Facility Holdings Corp.................................. |
82,444 |
1,468 |
Lakewood II |
12/16 |
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc....................... |
75,544 |
1,322 |
SunCom Building |
12/03 |
Honeywell...................................................... |
71,232 |
1,235 |
Honeywell Building |
07/08 |
Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc............. |
69,111 |
1,332 |
Lynnwood Plaza, Glen Forest |
(9) |
Ernst & Young............................................. |
47,393 |
1,243 |
(10) |
(10) |
|
------------ |
---------- |
|
|
|
3,511,357 |
$59,928 |
|
|
|
======== |
======= |
|
|
Total Rental Square Footage |
9,625,187 |
|
|
|
|
======== |
|
|
|
Total Annualized Rental Revenue |
$150,410 |
|
|
|
|
====== |
|
|
|
(1) Annualized Rental Revenue represents the gross rental rate (including escalations) per square foot as of January 1, 2003, multiplied by the number of square feet leased by the tenant. Annualized rent for customers at 233 North Michigan is calculated based on our 30% ownership interest through our investments in joint ventures. However, leased square feet represent 100% of our square feet leased through direct ownership or through joint ventures.
(2) GSA leases 309,589 square feet and the leases expire
as follows:
|
|
Lease |
|
Square |
Expiration |
Office Property |
Feet |
Date |
--------------------------------------------------------- |
----------- |
--------------- |
233 North Michigan............................................. |
189,316 |
11/09 |
One Jackson Place........................................................ |
22,734 |
07/10 |
First Tennessee Plaza.................................................... |
22,069 |
03/08 |
Moorefield II.............................................................. |
18,912 |
06/05 |
Falls Building........................................................... |
17,439 |
01/03 |
Greenbrier Tower II.................................................. |
13,971 |
01/10 |
Morgan Keegan Tower........................................... |
7,647 |
06/03 |
Stytel Centre................................................................... |
5,471 |
10/12 |
Moorefield III.......................................................... |
5,370 |
03/04 |
Town Point Center..................................................... |
5,155 |
11/11 |
Moorefield I.................................................................. |
1,505 |
06/05 |
|
---------- |
|
|
309,589 |
|
|
====== |
|
(3) Bank of America, NA leases 274,316 square feet in two properties under separate leases that expire as follows: 180,530 square feet in March 2012 at Bank of America Plaza in Nashville, TN and 93,786 square feet in June 2006 at Bank of America Tower in Columbia, SC.
(4) South Carolina State Government Agencies lease
236,770 square feet and the leases expire as follows:
|
|
Lease |
|
Square |
Expiration |
Office Property |
Feet |
Date |
----------------------------------------------------- |
------------ |
--------------- |
Capitol Center........................................................ |
159,303 |
06/05 |
Capitol Center............................................................ |
60,005 |
06/09 |
Capitol Center............................................................. |
10,310 |
08/04 |
Atrium at Stoneridge.................................................. |
7,152 |
01/04 |
|
---------- |
|
|
236,770 |
|
|
======= |
|
(5) WorldCom, Inc. leases 184,445 square feet and the
leases expire as follows:
|
|
Lease |
|
Square |
Expiration |
Office Property |
Feet |
Date |
-------------------------------------------------------- |
------------ |
--------------- |
Skytel Centre................................................................ |
155,927 |
07/05 |
One Jackson Place...................................................... |
15,992 |
12/02* |
Town Point Center...................................................... |
12,526 |
10/07 |
|
---------- |
|
|
184,445 |
|
|
===== |
|
*WorldCom, Inc. currently occupies 13,000 square feet in One Jackson Place and is in negotiations with Parkway for a renewal.
(6) Viad Corporation leases 159,299 square feet in the
Viad Corporate Center under separate leases that expire as follows: 156,364 square feet in August 2011, 1,858
square feet in April 2005 and 1,077 square feet in February 2009.
(7) Lynk Systems, Inc. leases 107,118 square feet in two
properties under separate leases that expire as follows: 105,011 square feet in December 2009 in
Falls Pointe and 2,107 square feet in
January 2003 in Roswell North.
(8) Boult, Cummings, Conners, & Berry, PLLC leases
98,813 square feet in the Bank of America Plaza under separate leases that
expire as follows: 79,086 square feet
in May 2009 and 19,727 square feet in May 2004.
(9) Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc. leases 69,111
square feet in two properties under separate leases that expire as
follows: 37,584 square feet in December
2004 in Glen Forest and 31,527 square feet in June 2003 in Lynnwood Plaza.
(10) Ernst & Young leases 47,393 square feet in four
properties and the leases expire as follows:
|
|
Lease |
|
Square |
Expiration |
Office Property |
Feet |
Date |
---------------------------------------------------------- |
------------ |
--------------- |
Bank of America Plaza........................................... |
25,251 |
12/06 |
Southtrust Bank Building........................................... |
13,810 |
09/03 |
BB&T Financial Center................................................. |
5,184 |
06/04 |
One Jackson Place..................................................... |
3,148 |
10/04 |
|
---------- |
|
|
47,393 |
|
|
===== |
|
Non-Core Assets
Since January 1, 1995, Parkway has pursued a strategy of liquidating its
non-core assets and using the proceeds from such sales to acquire office
properties, pay down short-term debt and repurchase its own stock. The
Company defines non-core assets as all assets other than office and parking
properties, which at December 31, 2002 consisted of land and mortgage loans. In
accordance with this strategy, Parkway sold non-core assets with a book value of
$550,000 for cash proceeds of $605,000 during 2001. Aggregate gains for
financial reporting purposes from sales of non-core assets during 2001 were
$55,000. Although there were no sales of non-core assets in 2002, the
Company recorded an impairment loss of $205,000 on an 11.856 acre parcel
of land in New Orleans, Louisiana. After recording the write down, the
carrying value corresponds with the net realizable
value of the land, based upon market research and comparable sales in the area. The book value of all remaining non-office building real estate assets and mortgage loans, all of which are for sale, was $4,397,000 as of December 31, 2002. Of this amount, $3,528,000 represents undeveloped land with a carrying cost of approximately $34,000 annually.
ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings.
The Company and its subsidiaries are,
from time to time, parties to litigation arising from the ordinary course of
their business. Management of Parkway
does not believe that any such litigation will materially affect the financial
position or operations of Parkway.
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
PART II
ITEM 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.
The Company's common stock ($.001 par
value) is listed and trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
"PKY". The number of record
holders of the Company's common stock at March 1, 2003, was approximately
2,887.
As of March 7, 2003, the last
reported sales price per common share on the New York Stock Exchange was
$36.77. The following table sets forth,
for the periods indicated, the high and low last reported sales prices per
share of the Company's common stock and the per share cash distributions paid
by Parkway during each quarter.
|
Year Ended |
Year Ended |
||||
|
December 31, 2002 |
December 31, 2001 |
||||
|
---------------------------------------- |
------------------------------------------ |
||||
Quarter Ended |
High |
Low |
Distributions |
High |
Low |
Distributions |
-------------------------- |
----------- |
------------ |
---------------- |
----------- |
------------ |
------------------ |
March 31..................... |
$36.50 |
$32.05 |
$ .63 |
$30.26 |
$28.01 |
$ .56 |
June 30....................... |
38.25 |
35.37 |
.63 |
35.25 |
28.51 |
.63 |
September 30.............. |
37.34 |
29.93 |
.65 |
34.50 |
30.05 |
.63 |
December 31............... |
36.39 |
31.51 |
.65 |
33.95 |
30.42 |
.63 |
|
|
|
------- |
|
|
------- |
|
|
|
$2.56 |
|
|
$2.45 |
|
|
|
==== |
|
|
==== |
Common stock distributions during 2002 and 2001 ($2.56 and $2.45 per share, respectively) were taxable as follows for federal income tax purposes:
|
Year Ended |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
----------------------- |
|
|
2002 |
2001 |
|
----------- |
------------ |
Ordinary income.......................................................................................... |
$2.52 |
$2.45 |
Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain.................................................................... |
.04 |
- |
|
------- |
------- |
|
$2.56 |
$2.45 |
|
==== |
==== |
The Company's shares of Series A 8.75% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock are also listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange and trade under the symbol "PKY PrA". As of March 7, 2003, the last reported sales price per Series A preferred share on the New York Stock Exchange was $25.50. The following table shows the high and low preferred share prices and per share distributions paid for each quarter of 2002 and 2001 reported by the New York Stock Exchange.
|
Year Ended |
Year Ended |
||||
|
December 31, 2002 |
December 31, 2001 |
||||
|
----------------------------------------- |
------------------------------------------ |
||||
Quarter Ended |
High |
Low |
Distributions |
High |
Low |
Distributions |
|
------------- |
--------- |
----------------- |
------------- |
------------ |
---------------- |
March 31..................... |
$25.48 |
$24.65 |
$ .55 |
$23.25 |
$20.13 |
$ .55 |
June 30......................... |
25.65 |
24.65 |
.55 |
25.10 |
23.00 |
.55 |
September 30............... |
24.80 |
26.08 |
.55 |
25.20 |
23.95 |
.55 |
December 31................. |
24.95 |
26.05 |
.54 |
25.25 |
24.40 |
.54 |
|
|
|
------ |
|
|
------ |
|
|
|
$2.19 |
|
|
$2.19 |
|
|
|
==== |
|
|
==== |
As of March 1, 2003, there were
approximately 63 holders of record of the Company's 2,650,000 outstanding
shares of Series A preferred stock.
Preferred stock distributions during 2002 and 2001 were taxable as
follows for federal income tax purposes:
|
Year Ended December 31 |
|
|
||
|
------------------------ |
|
|
2002 |
2001 |
|
----------- |
------------ |
Ordinary income........................................................................................... |
$2.15 |
$2.19 |
Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain............................................................................. |
.04 |
- |
|
------ |
------ |
|
$2.19 |
$2.19 |
|
==== |
==== |
In 2001, the Company issued 2,142,857
shares of its Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock to
Rothschild/Five Arrows for net proceeds of $73,006,000. The funds were applied to the purchase of
the 233 North Michigan Building and adjacent parking garage in Chicago,
Illinois and were used to reduce amounts of debt outstanding on the Company's
lines of credit. The dividend payment
rate on these shares is 8.34% and total dividends of $6,257,000 and $3,249,000
were declared on the stock in 2002 and 2001, respectively. There is no public market for Parkway's
Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. In connection with the sales of convertible preferred equity,
Parkway issued a warrant to Five Arrows to purchase 75,000 shares of the
Company's common stock at a price of $35 for a period of seven years.
Equity Compensation Plans
The
following table sets forth the securities authorized for issuance under
Parkway's equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2002:
|
(a) |
(b) |
(c) |
|
|
|
Number of securities |
|
Number of securities |
|
remaining available for |
|
to |
|
future issuance under |
|
be issued upon |
Weighted-average |
equity compensation |
|
exercise |
exercise price of, |
plans (excluding |
|
of outstanding options, |
outstanding options, |
securities reflected in |
Plan category |
warrants and rights |
warrants and rights |
column (a) |
---------------------------- |
------------------------- |
------------------------ |
------------------------- |
Equity compensation plans |
|
` |
|
approved by security |
|
|
|
holders.................................. |
922,197 |
$29.24 |
318,199 |
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans |
|
|
|
not approved by security |
|
|
|
holders.................................. |
|
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
--------- |
-------- |
--------- |
Total |
922,197 |
$29.24 |
318,199 |
|
====== |
===== |
====== |
ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data.
|
Year |
Year |
Year |
Year |
Year |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
||||
Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
Income from office and parking properties..... |
$152,442 |
$135,968 |
$118,970 |
$113,161 |
$ 95,438 |
Other income............................................... |
3,642 |
2,829 |
3,554 |
1,159 |
1,045 |
|
---------- |
----------- |
----------- |
----------- |
----------- |
Total revenues |
156,084 |
138,797 |
122,524 |
114,320 |
96,483 |
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
Office and parking properties................... |
65,942 |
57,465 |
49,397 |
47,458 |
40,844 |
Non-core assets....................................... |
34 |
39 |
60 |
112 |
153 |
Interest expense...................................... |
19,006 |
20,526 |
16,371 |
15,346 |
11,660 |
Depreciation and amortization.................. |
27,412 |
23,788 |
19,651 |
17,413 |
13,256 |
Interest expense............................................ |
6,647 |
5,497 |
6,927 |
4,104 |
4,349 |
General and administrative and other........... |
5,445 |
5,240 |
4,689 |
4,353 |
3,583 |
|
---------- |
----------- |
----------- |
----------- |
----------- |
Income before gain (loss) , minority interest, dis- |
|
|
|
|
|
continued operations and extraordinary item |
31,598 |
26,242 |
25,429 |
25,534 |
22,638 |
Gain (loss) on joint venture interest, real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
and real estate equity securities...................... |
(2,068) |
1,611 |
9,471 |
795 |
4,788 |
Minority interest - unit holders........................... |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(2) |
(1) |
|
---------- |
----------- |
----------- |
----------- |
----------- |
Income before discontinued operations and |
|
|
|
|
|
extraordinary item........................................ |
29,528 |
27,850 |
34,896 |
26,327 |
27,425 |
Income from discontinued operations................. |
47 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Gain on sale of real estate from |
|
|
|
|
|
discontinued operations............................. |
770 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
---------- |
----------- |
----------- |
----------- |
----------- |
Income before extraordinary item.................................. |
30,345 |
27,850 |
34,896 |
26,327 |
27,425 |
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of |
|
|
|
|
|
mortgage notes payable............................... |
(833) |
(1,302) |
- |
- |
- |
|
---------- |
----------- |
----------- |
----------- |
----------- |
Net income................................................... |
29,512 |
26,548 |
34,896 |
26,327 |
27,425 |
Dividends on preferred stock.......................... |
(5,797) |
(5,797) |
(5,797) |
(5,797) |
(3,913) |
Dividends on convertible preferred stock..... |
(6,257) |
(3,249) |
- |
- |
- |
|
---------- |
----------- |
----------- |
----------- |
----------- |
Net income available to common stockholders... |
$ 17,458 |
$ 17,502 |
$ 29,099 |
$ 20,530 |
$ 23,512 |
|
======= |
======= |
======= |
======= |
======= |
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
Income before discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
and extraordinary item............................. |
$ 1.87 |
$ 2.01 |
$ 2.96 |
$ 2.04 |
$ 2.24 |
Discontinued operations............................... |
.09 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment |
|
|
|
|
|
of mortgage notes payable....................... |
(.09) |
(.14) |
- |
- |
- |
|
---------- |
----------- |
----------- |
----------- |
----------- |
Net income................................................... |
$ 1.87 |
$ 1.87 |
$ 2.96 |
$ 2.04 |
$ 2.24 |
|
======= |
======= |
======= |
======= |
======= |
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
Income before discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
and extraordinary item............................... |
$ 1.84 |
$ 1.99 |
$ 2.93 |
$ 2.01 |
$ 2.21 |
Discontinued operations................................ |
.09 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment |
|
|
|
|
|
of mortgage notes payable.................... |
(.09) |
(.14) |
- |
- |
- |
|
-------------- |
-------------- |
-------------- |
-------------- |
-------------- |
Net income................................................ |
$ 1.84 |
$ 1.85 |
$ 2.93 |
$ 2.01 |
$ 2.21 |
|
======= |
======= |
======= |
======= |
======= |
Book value per common share (at end of year).. |
$ 25.10 |
$ 25.33 |
$ 26.51 |
$ 25.55 |
$ 25.89 |
Dividends per common share............................ |
$ 2.56 |
$ 2.45 |
$ 2.12 |
$ 1.90 |
$ 1.60 |
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic.............................................................. |
9,312 |
9,339 |
9,825 |
10,083 |
10,490 |
Diluted............................................................ |
9,480 |
9,442 |
9,926 |
10,197 |
10,621 |
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
Office and parking investments, net of |
|
|
|
|
|
depreciation............................................. |
$706,551 |
$795,860 |
$596,109 |
$625,365 |
$568,244 |
Real estate equity securities....................... |
- |
- |
23,281 |
- |
- |
Total assets................................................ |
763,937 |
840,612 |
655,237 |
649,369 |
592,252 |
Notes payable to banks.............................. |
141,970 |
126,044 |
81,882 |
86,640 |
40,896 |
Mortgage notes payable............................ |
209,746 |
304,985 |
225,470 |
214,736 |
201,841 |
Total liabilities................................................ |
387,116 |
465,031 |
329,488 |
328,305 |
264,301 |
Preferred stock......................................... |
66,250 |
66,250 |
66,250 |
66,250 |
66,250 |
Convertible preferred stock.......................... |
75,000 |
75,000 |
- |
- |
- |
Stockholders' equity.................................. |
376,821 |
375,581 |
325,749 |
321,064 |
327,951 |
ITEM 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation.
Financial Condition
Comments
are for the balance sheet dated December 31, 2002 compared to the balance sheet
dated December 31, 2001.
In 2002, Parkway continued the
application of its strategy of operating and acquiring office properties, joint
venturing interests in office assets, as well as liquidating non-core assets
and office assets that no longer meet the Company's investment criteria and/or
the Company has determined value will be maximized by selling. During the year ended December 31, 2002, the
Company purchased five office properties, sold one office property and sold a
70% joint venture interest. Total
assets decreased $76,675,000, and office and parking properties (before
depreciation) decreased $69,889,000 or 8.0%.
Parkway's direct investment in office
and parking properties decreased $89,309,000 net of depreciation, to a carrying
amount of $706,551,000 at December 31, 2002 and consisted of 54 operating
properties. During the year ending
December 31, 2002, Parkway purchased five office properties as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
Date |
Purchase |
Office Property |
Location |
Square Feet |
Purchased |
Price |
------------------------------ |
-------------- |
--------------- |
------------- |
------------- |
The Park on Camelback |
Phoenix, AZ |
103 |
05/22/02 |
$12,355 |
Viad Corporate Center |
Phoenix, AZ |
482 |
05/31/02 |
58,000 |
5300 Memorial |
Houston, TX |
154 |
06/05/02 |
12,366 |
Town & Country Central One |
Houston, TX |
148 |
06/05/02 |
8,076 |
1717 St. James Place |
Houston, TX |
110 |
06/05/02 |
6,744 |
|
|
----- |
|
-------- |
Total |
|
997 |
|
$97,541 |
|
|
=== |
|
===== |
During the year ending December 31, 2002, the Company capitalized building improvements and additional purchase expenses of $15,825,000 and recorded depreciation expense of $25,344,000 related to its office and parking properties.
On May 31, 2002, the Company closed
on the cash sale of its 96,000 square foot office property in Indianapolis,
Indiana for net proceeds of $3,192,000.
The Company recorded a gain for financial reporting purposes of $770,000
on the sale. The net proceeds from the
sale were used to reduce amounts outstanding on the Company's lines of credit.
The Company is also considering
selling its property in Greenville, South Carolina. During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company recorded an
impairment loss on the Greenville, South Carolina property in the amount of
$1.6 million. The loss was created
largely by rental rate decreases and current conditions within the market. The estimated fair value of the Greenville
property was determined based on current prices of similar properties in the
market area. The decision to sell
operating assets will be based upon the Company's analysis of existing markets
and competing investment opportunities.
On May 30, 2002, the Company closed
the sale of a 70% interest in our investment in Parkway 233 North Michigan LLC
(The "Chicago Joint Venture"), a subsidiary limited liability company
that owns the 233 North Michigan Avenue building in Chicago, to an affiliate of
Investcorp for a price equal to approximately 70% of the Company's original purchase
price of the property plus all capital costs since it acquired the property in
June 2001. Parkway continues to provide
management and leasing services for the building on a day-to-day basis. In connection with the sale, Parkway
recognized a $250,000 acquisition fee in accordance with the terms of the joint
venture agreement. The Company recorded
a loss of $269,000 on the sale of the 70% interest in the Chicago Joint
Venture.
Prior to the Chicago Joint Venture,
the subsidiary that owned 233 North Michigan Avenue was capitalized with equity
of approximately $72 million and a 10-year first mortgage with a balance of
approximately $105 million as of May 30, 2002.
The first mortgage remained in place as an obligation of the Chicago
Joint Venture. Parkway received net
cash proceeds of approximately $55 million from the sale and used the proceeds
to purchase new properties and to reduce short-term borrowings under the
Company's lines of credit. The Chicago
Joint Venture is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Parkway's net investment in the Chicago
Joint Venture at December 31, 2002 was $15,209,000. Under Parkway's new three-year strategic plan, VALUE2,
the Company plans to pursue additional joint venture opportunities by venturing
with best partners. Under terms of the
existing joint venture agreement with Investcorp, the Company will operate,
manage and lease the properties on a day-to-day basis, provide acquisition and
construction management services to the ventures and receive fees for providing
these services.
At December 31, 2002, non-core
assets, other than mortgage loans, totaled $3,528,000. During the year ended December 31, 2002, the
Company recorded an impairment loss of $205,000 on 11.856 acres of land in New
Orleans, Louisiana. After recording the
write down, the carrying value corresponds with the net realizable value of the
land, based on market research and comparable sales in the area. The Company expects to continue its efforts
to liquidate its remaining non-core assets.
During 2002, the note receivable from
Moore Building Associates LP decreased a net $946,000 due to payments received
on the note. The note bears interest at
a rate of 13% annually.
Notes payable to banks totaled
$141,970,000 at December 31, 2002 and are the result of advances under bank
lines of credit to purchase additional office properties and make improvements
to office properties and fund development costs.
Mortgage notes payable without
recourse decreased $95,239,000 during the year ending December 31, 2002, as a
result of the following (in thousands):
|
Increase |
|
(Decrease) |
|
------------ |
Placement of mortgage debt.............................. |
$ 29,975 |
Scheduled principal payments............................ |
(10,966) |
Principal paid on early extinguishment of debt. |
(9,874) |
Mortgage on 233 North Michigan |
|
(now responsibility of the Chicago Joint Venture) |
(104,699) |
Market value adjustment on reverse swap |
|
interest rate contract....................................... |
325 |
|
------------ |
|
$ (95,239) |
|
======== |
On April 11, 2002, the Company closed
a $20,450,000 non-recourse first mortgage on the Bank of America Plaza building
in Nashville, Tennessee. The loan was
funded by New York Life Insurance Company at a fixed rate of 7.10% and matures
May 10, 2012. On May 30, 2002, the
Company closed a $9,525,000 non-recourse first mortgage on the One Park Ten
building in Houston, Texas. The loan
was funded by Wachovia Securities at a fixed rate of 7.10% and matures June 1,
2012.
In 2002, Parkway recognized an
extraordinary loss on the early extinguishment of mortgage notes payable in the
amount of $833,000. The extraordinary
loss represents the write-off of unamortized loan origination fees and
prepayment penalties paid on higher interest rate, lower loan to value, faster
amortizing loans.
The Company expects to continue
seeking fixed rate, non-recourse mortgage financing at terms ranging from ten
to thirty years on select office building investments as additional capital is
needed. The Company plans to maintain a
ratio of debt to total market capitalization from 25% to 50% although such
ratio may from time to time temporarily exceed 50%, especially when the Company
has incurred significant amounts of short-term debt in connection with
acquisitions. In addition, volatility
in the price of the Company's common stock may result in a debt to total market
capitalization ratio exceeding 50% from time to time. In addition to this debt ratio, the Company also monitors
interest and fixed charge coverage ratios.
The interest coverage ratio is computed by comparing the cash interest
accrued to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. This ratio for years ending December 31,
2002 and 2001 was 3.42 and 3.09 times, respectively. The fixed charge coverage ratio is computed by comparing the cash
interest accrued, principal payments made on mortgage loans and preferred
dividends paid to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization. This ratio for the years
ending December 31, 2002 and 2001 was 1.80 and 1.70 times, respectively.
Stockholders' equity increased
$1,240,000 during the year ended December 31, 2002 as a result of the following
(in thousands):
|
Increase |
Net income.................................................................. |
$29,512 |
Change in market value of interest rate swap.............. |
1,524 |
|
------------ |
Comprehensive income......................... ................ |
31,036 |
|
|
Common stock dividends declared......................... |
(23,879) |
Preferred stock dividends declared.................................. |
(5,797) |
Convertible preferred stock dividends declared............. |
(6,257) |
Exercise of stock options............................................ |
2,996 |
Amortization of unearned compensation........................ |
2,190 |
Shares issued in lieu of Directors' fees............................ |
62 |
Shares issued through DRIP Plan................................... |
1,310 |
Shares issued - employee excellence recognition program |
3 |
Purchase of Company stock............................................ |
(424) |
|
---------- |
|
$ 1,240 |
|
====== |
During the year ended December 31,
2002, the Company purchased 14,100 shares of its common stock at an average
price of $30.08. Since June 1998, the
Company has purchased a total of 2,141,593 shares if its common stock, which
represents approximately 19% of the common stock outstanding when the buyback
program was initiated on June 30, 1998.
The Company has the authority to purchase an additional 485,900 shares
under its existing authorization from its Board of Directors.
During 1999 through 2001, the
Compensation Committee approved the issuance of shares of restricted stock to
officers of the Company as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
Stock Price |
|
|
Number of |
Per Share |
|
Date |
Shares |
at Grant Date |
Restricted Stock |
----------- |
---------------- |
------------------- |
---------------------- |
03/04/99 |
150 |
$28.3750 |
$4,256 |
09/14/99 |
8 |
$32.1875 |
258 |
05/10/00 |
2 |
$31.1250 |
62 |
11/01/00 |
6 |
$28.5625 |
171 |
12/11/00 |
1 |
$28.5000 |
29 |
03/08/01 |
2 |
$30.0000 |
60 |
|
---- |
|
-------- |
|
169 |
|
$4,836 |
|
=== |
|
===== |
The vesting period for the stock was
originally stated as 10 years, but would be accelerated to December 31, 2002,
if certain operating results were achieved by the Company through the 5 in
50 Plan. Parkway met the goals
set forth in the 5 in 50 Plan. In
February 2003, the Company's Compensation Committee determined that all of the
restricted shares were vested. The
Company had fully amortized the restricted shares as of December 31, 2002.
Since 1999, the Company recorded a
total of $4,836,000 as additional paid-in capital when the shares of restricted
stock were issued, offset by unearned compensation of the same amount. The unearned compensation was deducted from
stockholders' equity and is fully amortized as of December 31, 2002. Compensation expense related to the
restricted stock of $2,190,000 and $1,272,000 was recognized in 2002 and 2001,
respectively. Pending approval from its
shareholders, Parkway anticipates utilizing restricted share grants as
incentive compensation for its new
three-year strategic plan,
VALUE 2.
Results of Operations
Comments are for the year ended December
31, 2002 compared to the year ended December 31, 2001.
Net income available for common stockholders for the year ended December
31, 2002 was $17,458,000 ($1.87 per basic common share) as compared to
$17,502,000 ($1.87 per basic common share) for the year ended December 31, 2001.
Net income for the year ending December 31, 2002 included a net loss of
$1,298,000, which was attributable to the sale of the Chicago Joint Venture; the
sale of the Company's only office property in Indianapolis, Indiana; an
impairment loss on the Company's only asset in Greenville, South Carolina; and
an
impairment loss on non-earning land in New Orleans, Louisiana. Net income for the year ending December 31, 2001 included a net gain on the sale of one office property, land and real estate equity securities totaling $1,611,000. In addition, net income included an extraordinary loss on the early extinguishment of mortgage notes payable in the amount of $833,000 and $1,302,000 for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Operating Properties. The primary reason for the change in the
Company's net income from office and parking properties for 2002 as compared to
2001 is the net effect of the operations of the following properties purchased,
properties sold or joint venture interest sold (in thousands):
Properties Purchased:
|
|
Square |
Office Properties |
Purchase Date |
Feet |
----------------------- |
------------------- |
----------- |
233 North Michigan................................................... |
06/22/01 |
1,068 |
550 Greens Parkway...................................... .... |
10/01/01 |
72 |
Bank of America Plaza............................................. |
12/20/01 |
418 |
The Park on Camelback....................... |
05/22/02 |
103 |
Viad Corporate Center......................................... |
05/31/02 |
484 |
5300 Memorial....................................................... ... |
06/05/02 |
154 |
Town & Country Central One................................... |
06/05/02 |
148 |
1717 St. James Place.............................................. |
06/05/02 |
110 |
|
|
|
Properties Sold:
|
|
Square |
Office Properties |
Date Sold |
Feet |
----------------------- |
------------- |
----------- |
Vestavia................................................................ |
03/30/01 |
75 |
Corporate Square West.......................................... |
05/31/02 |
96 |
Joint Venture Interest Sold:
|
|
Square |
Office Property/Interest Sold |
Date Sold |
Feet |
--------------------------------------- |
--------------- |
----------- |
233 North Michigan/70%.......................................... |
05/30/02 |
1,068 |
Operations of office and parking properties are summarized below (in thousands):
|
Year Ended December 31 |
|
|
----------------------------------- |
|
|
2002 |
2001 |
|
----------------- |
--------------- |
Income......................................................... |
$152,442 |
$135,968 |
Operating expense......................................... |
(65,942) |
(57,465) |
|
---------- |
---------- |
|
86,500 |
78,503 |
Mortgage interest expense......................... |
(19,006) |
(20,526) |
Depreciation and amortization....................... |
(27,412) |
(23,788) |
|
----------- |
----------- |
Income from office and parking properties......... |
$ 40,082 |
$ 34,189 |
|
====== |
====== |
Dividend Income. Dividend income
decreased $495,000 for the year ending December 31, 2002 compared to the year
ending December 31, 2001. The decrease
is due to the Company's sale of all real estate equity securities held through
the RSVP Program during the first quarter of 2001. Although we currently have no RSVP investments, we will continue
to pursue opportunities in the public market in accordance with the RSVP Plan
as conditions warrant.
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures. Equity in earnings of unconsolidated
joint ventures increased $762,000 for the year ending December 31, 2002
compared to the year ending December 31, 2001.
This increase is attributable to Parkway's 30% interest in the Chicago
Joint Venture in 2002. Under the terms
of the joint venture agreement with Investcorp, Parkway continues to provide
management and leasing services for the Chicago Joint Venture on a day-to-day
basis. This also accounts for the
$352,000 increase in management company income in 2002 compared to 2001. Under Parkway's new three-year strategic plan, VALUE2, Parkway will continue to pursue joint venture
opportunities with best partners while maintaining the management and leasing
of the properties on a day-to-day basis.
Interest Expense. The $1,520,000
decrease in interest expense on office properties in 2002 compared to 2001 is
primarily due to the net effect of the
early extinguishment of mortgage notes payable, the transfer of a mortgage note
payable to the Chicago Joint Venture and new loans placed in 2002 and
2001. The average interest rate on mortgage
notes payable as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 was 7.37% and 7.41%,
respectively.
The $1,150,000 increase in interest
expense on bank notes for the year ending December 31, 2002 compared to the
year ending December 31, 2001 is primarily due to the increase in the average
balance of borrowings outstanding under bank lines of credit from $74,194,000
during 2001 to $127,107,000 during 2002.
In addition, weighted average interest rates on bank lines of credit
decreased from 6.44% during 2001 to 4.68% during 2002.
General and Administrative Expense. General
and administrative expenses were $5,029,000 and $4,861,000 for the years ending
December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
The net increase of $168,000 is primarily attributable to a few factors. Due to Parkway's achievement of the 5
in 50 Plan, the restricted shares granted were fully amortized as of
December 31, 2002. Therefore,
amortization expense of restricted stock grants increased in 2002 by
$917,000. Pending approval from its
shareholders, Parkway anticipates utilizing restricted share grants as
incentive compensation for its new three-year strategic plan, VALUE2.
In 2002, Parkway settled a lawsuit
dating back to the early 1990's relating to management of our headquarters building,
One Jackson Place, located in Jackson, Mississippi. The settlement resulted in a $312,000 increase to 2002 general
and administrative expense. We do not
anticipate any further costs associated with this matter.
Finally, increased intercompany
management fee income of $945,000 for 2002 compared to 2001 resulted in a
decrease in general and administrative expense in 2002.
Results of Operations
Comments are for the year ended December
31, 2001 compared to the year ended December 31, 2000.
Net income available for common
stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2001 was $17,502,000 ($1.87 per
basic common share) as compared to $29,099,000 ($2.96 per basic common share)
for the year ended December 31, 2000.
Net income included net gains from the sale of real estate, real estate
equity securities and other assets in the amounts of $1,611,000 and $9,471,000
for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. In addition, net income included an
extraordinary loss on the early extinguishment of mortgage notes payable in the
amount of $1,302,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001.
Operating Properties. The
primary reason for the change in the Company's net income from office and
parking properties for 2001 as compared to 2000 was the net effect of the
operations of the following properties purchased, constructed or sold (in
thousands, except number of spaces):
Properties Purchased/Constructed:
----------------------------------------------
|
|
Square |
Office Properties |
Purchase Date |
Feet |
----------------------- |
------------------- |
---------- |
Central Station.............................................. |
08/03/00 |
133 |
233 North Michigan..................................... |
06/22/01 |
1,068 |
550 Greens Parkway.................................... |
10/01/01 |
72 |
Bank of America Plaza................................... |
12/20/01 |
418 |
|
|
|
Parking Property |
Completion Date |
Spaces |
------------------------ |
------------------- |
---------- |
Toyota Center Garage................................. |
04/01/00 |
770 |
|
|
|
Properties Sold:
---------------------
|
|
Square |
Office Properties |
Date Sold |
Feet |
----------------------- |
------------- |
---------- |
Cherokee................................................................. |
06/20/00 |
54 |
Courthouse.............................................................. |
06/20/00 |
95 |
Loudoun Plaza.......................................................... |
06/20/00 |
72 |
First Little Rock Plaza............................................... |
06/22/00 |
116 |
Vestavia.................................................................... |
03/30/01 |
75 |
Operations of office and parking properties are summarized below (in thousands):
|
Year Ended December 31 |
|
|
------------------------------- |
|
|
2001 |
2000 |
|
---------------- |
--------------- |
Income............................................................... |
$135,968 |
$118,970 |
Operating expense............................................ |
(57,465) |
(49,397) |
|
---------- |
---------- |
|
78,503 |
69,573 |
Mortgage interest expense........................................... |
(20,526) |
(16,371) |
Depreciation and amortization.................................... |
(23,788) |
(19,651) |
|
----------- |
----------- |
Income from office and parking properties.................. |
$ 34,189 |
$ 33,551 |
|
======= |
======= |
At December 31, 2001, the Company had
one office property greater than 10% of total assets, the 233 North Michigan
building and adjacent parking garage in Chicago, Illinois with a net book value
of $173,108,000 or 20.6% of total assets.
The effect of the Company's
operations related to the 233 North Michigan building and adjacent parking
garage included in the operations of office and parking properties since its
acquisition on June 22, 2001 was as follows (in thousands):
|
Year Ended |
|
December 31 |
|
2001 |
|
--------------- |
Income............................................................................. |
$15,637 |
Operating expense............................................................ |
(6,744) |
|
--------- |
|
8,893 |
Mortgage interest expense................................................................ |
(4,048) |
Depreciation and amortization |
(2,266) |
|
--------- |
Income from 233 North Michigan building....................... |
$2,579 |
|
====== |
Dividend
Income. Dividend income decreased
$710,000 for the year ending December 31, 2001 compared to the year ending December 31, 2000.
The decrease is due to the Company's sale of all real estate equity
securities held through the RSVP Program during the first quarter of 2001.
Interest and Incentive Management Fee Income. Interest income
earned on the note receivable from Moore Building Associates LP increased
$68,000 and the incentive management fee earned from the Toyota Center
(formerly Moore Building) increased $125,000 for the year ending December 31,
2001 compared to the year ending December 31, 2000.
Non-core Assets. Net losses on operations of other real estate
properties held for sale were $39,000 and $60,000 for the years ending December
31, 2001 and 2000, respectively, and consisted of property taxes on land held
for sale.
Interest Expense. The $4,155,000 increase in interest expense on
office properties in 2001 compared to 2000 is primarily due to the mortgage
loans assumed and/or new loans placed in 2001 and 2000. The average interest rate on mortgage notes
payable as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 was 7.41% and 7.47%, respectively.
The $1,589,000 decrease in
contractual interest expense on bank notes for the year ending December 31,
2001 compared to the year ending December 31, 2000 is primarily due to the
decrease in the average balance of borrowings outstanding under bank lines of
credit from $87,628,000 during 2000 to $74,194,000 during 2001. In addition, weighted average interest rates
under existing bank lines of credit decreased from 7.78% for the year ending
December 31, 2000 to 6.44% for the year ending December 31, 2001.
General and Administrative Expense.
General and
administrative expenses were $4,861,000 and $3,951,000 for the years ending
December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
The net increase of $910,000 is primarily due to the increase in
amortization of unearned compensation expense pertaining to the Company's
restricted stock shares and additional personnel and related costs as a result
of the 28% increase in total assets.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Statement of Cash Flows.
Cash and cash equivalents were $1,594,000 and $2,392,000 at December 31,
2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively.
The Company generated $63,529,000 in cash flows from operating
activities during the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to $52,448,000 for
the same period of 2001. The Company
used $58,582,000 in investing activities during the year ended December 31,
2002. Proceeds from the sale of an
office property and the Chicago Joint Venture interest were $58,602,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2002. In
implementing its investment strategy, the Company used $97,823,000 to purchase
operating properties. The Company also
spent $20,063,000 to make capital improvements at its office properties and
$230,000 toward the Toyota Center Garage real estate redevelopment
project. Cash dividends of $35,499,000
($2.56 per common share, $2.1875 per Series A preferred share and $2.92 per Series
B preferred share) were paid to stockholders, and 14,100 shares of common stock
were repurchased for a total of $424,000.
Proceeds from long-term financing were $29,975,000, scheduled principal
payments were $10,966,000, and principal payments on early extinguishment of
debt were $9,874,000 on mortgage notes payable during the year ended December
31, 2002. In 2002, Parkway recognized
an extraordinary loss on the early extinguishment of debt in the amount of
$833,000.
Liquidity. The Company
plans to continue pursuing the acquisition of additional investments that meet
the Company's investment criteria in accordance with the strategies outlined
under "Item 1. Business" and intends to use bank lines of credit,
proceeds from the sale of non-core assets and office properties, proceeds from
the sale of portions of owned assets through joint ventures, possible sale of
securities and cash balances to fund those acquisitions. At December 31, 2002, the Company had
$141,970,000 outstanding under two bank lines of credit and a term loan.
The Company's cash flows are exposed
to interest rate changes primarily as a result of its lines of credit used to
maintain liquidity and fund capital expenditures and expansion of the Company's
real estate investment portfolio and operations. The Company's interest rate risk management objective is to limit
the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower its
overall borrowing costs. To achieve its
objectives, the Company borrows at fixed rates, but also has a three-year $135
million secured revolving credit facility with a consortium of 13 banks with
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. serving as the lead agent (the "$135 million line")
and a one-year $15 million unsecured line of credit with PNC Bank (the "$15
million line"). The interest rates on
the lines of credit are equal to the 30-day LIBOR rate plus 112.5 to 137.5
basis points, depending upon overall Company leverage. The weighted average interest rate on the
$15 million line and the $135 million line was 2.68% and 4.98% at December 31,
2002, respectively.
On June 4, 2002, Parkway entered into
a Credit Agreement (the "Credit Agreement") with JP Morgan Chase
Bank, as Administrative Agent, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
Syndication Agent, and other banks as participants. The Credit Agreement, among other things, provides for a new $35
million one-year term loan facility (the "Term Loan") of which $35
million was drawn upon and paid to Parkway as of June 4, 2002. Excluding bank fees and closing costs, the
Term Loan bears interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 112.5 to 137.5 basis
points, depending on Parkway's leverage.
Accrued and unpaid interest under the Term Loan is payable monthly with
the final interest payment as well as the entire principal amount outstanding
thereunder due and payable on June 4, 2003.
The weighted average interest rate on the Term Loan was 2.81% at
December 31, 2002.
The Company's interest rate hedge
contracts are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
Type of |
Notional |
Maturity |
|
Fixed |
----------------------------- |
|
Hedge |
Amount |
Date |
Reference Rate |
Rate |
2002 |
2001 |
--------------- |
----------- |
------------- |
-------------------------- |
-------- |
----------- |
----------- |
Swap |
$51,000 |
01/15/03 |
1-Month LIBOR |
5.44% |
$(170) |
$(1,694) |
Reverse Swap |
$ 5,300 |
07/15/06 |
1-Month LIBOR + 3.455% |
8.08% |
325 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
-------- |
-------- |
|
|
|
|
|
$155 |
$(1,694) |
|
|
|
|
|
===== |
===== |
The Company designated the swap as a
hedge of the variable interest rates on the Company's borrowings under the $135
million line. Accordingly, changes in
the fair value of the swap are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive
income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings.
During 2002, the Company entered into
a reverse swap interest rate contract.
The effect of the reverse swap is to convert a fixed rate mortgage note
payable to a variable rate. The Company
does not hold or issue these types of derivative contracts for trading or
speculative purposes.
On January 6, 2003, the Company
entered into a $50 million interest rate swap agreement with Southtrust Bank
effectively locking the interest rate on this portion of outstanding unsecured,
floating rate bank debt at
1.545% through December 31, 2003. The interest rate swap reduces the company's interest rate risk while it pursues placement of non-recourse, long-term secured mortgages on certain of its recent acquisitions.
The $15 million line is unsecured and
is expected to fund the daily cash requirements of the Company's treasury
management system. This line of credit
matures August 3, 2003 and has a current interest rate equal to the 30-day
LIBOR rate plus 130 basis points. The
Company paid a facility fee of $15,000 (10 basis points) upon closing of the
loan agreement. Under the $15 million
line, the Company does not pay annual administration fees or fees on the unused
portion of the line.
The $135 million line is also
unsecured and is expected to fund acquisitions of additional investments. This line of credit matures June 28, 2004
and has a current interest rate equal to the LIBOR rate plus 137.5 basis
points. The Company paid a facility fee
of $225,000 (16.67 basis points) and origination fees of $464,000 (41.85 basis
points) upon closing of the loan agreement and pays an annual administration
fee of $37,500. The Company also pays
fees on the unused portion of the line based upon overall Company leverage,
with the current rate set at 25 basis points.
The Term Loan is unsecured and is
expected to fund acquisitions of additional investments. The Term Loan matures June 4, 2003 and has a
current interest rate equal to the LIBOR rate plus 137.5 basis points. The Company paid facility and origination
fees of $170,000 (48.57 basis points) upon closing of the loan agreement. The Company does not pay annual
administration fees or fees on the unused portion of the Term Loan.
At December 31, 2002, the Company had
$209,746,000 of non-recourse fixed rate mortgage notes payable with an average
interest rate of 7.37% secured by office properties and $141,970,000 drawn
under bank lines of credit and the Term Loan.
Parkway's pro rata share of unconsolidated joint venture debt was
$31,420,000 with an average interest rate of 7.36% at December 31, 2002. Based on the Company's total market
capitalization of approximately $853,673,000 at December 31, 2002 (using the
December 31, 2002 closing price of $35.08 per common share), the Company's debt
represented approximately 44.9% of its total market capitalization. The Company plans to maintain a ratio of
debt to total market capitalization from 25% to 50% although such ratio may
from time to time temporarily exceed 50%, especially when the Company has
incurred significant amounts of short-term debt in connection with
acquisitions. In addition, volatility
in the price of the Company's common stock may result in a debt to market
capitalization exceeding 50% from time to time. In addition to this debt ratio, the Company also monitors
interest and fixed charge coverage ratios.
The interest coverage ratio is computed by comparing the cash interest
accrued to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. This ratio for the year ending December 31,
2002 and 2001 was 3.42 and 3.09 times, respectively. The fixed charge coverage ratio is computed by comparing the cash
interest accrued, principal payments made on mortgage loans and preferred
dividends paid to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. This ratio for the year ending December 31,
2002 and 2001 was 1.80 and 1.70 times, respectively.
The table below presents the
principal payments due and weighted average interest rates for the fixed rate
debt.
|
Average |
Fixed Rate Debt |
|
Interest Rate |
(In thousands) |
|
---------------- |
------------------- |
2003 |
7.37% |
$ 11,062 |
2004 |
7.37% |
11,899 |
2005 |
7.37% |
12,804 |
2006 |
7.36% |
17,669 |
2007 |
7.36% |
14,294 |
Thereafter |
7.55% |
142,018 |
|
|
---------- |
Total |
|
$209,746 |
|
|
====== |
|
|
|
Fair value at 12/31/02 |
|
$224,227 |
|
|
====== |
The Company presently has plans to make additional capital improvements at its office properties in 2003 of approximately $20,721,000. These expenses include tenant improvements, capitalized acquisition costs and capitalized building improvements. Approximately $4,269,000 of these improvements relate to upgrades on properties acquired in recent years that were anticipated at the time of purchase. All such improvements are expected to be financed by cash flow from the properties and advances on the bank lines of credit.
The Company anticipates that its
current cash balance, operating cash flows, proceeds from the sale of office
properties held for sale, proceeds from the sale of portions of owned assets
through joint ventures, possible sale of securities and borrowings (including
borrowings under the working capital line of credit and the Term Loan) will be
adequate to pay the Company's (i) operating and administrative expenses, (ii)
debt service obligations, (iii) distributions to shareholders, (iv) capital
improvements, and (v) normal repair and maintenance expenses at its properties
both in the short and long term.
Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates
General. Our investments are generally made in
office properties. We are, therefore,
generally subject to risks incidental to the ownership of real estate. Some of these risks include changes in
supply or demand for office properties or tenants for such properties in an
area in which we have buildings; changes in real estate tax rates; and changes
in federal income tax, real estate and zoning laws. Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations is based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements. Our Consolidated Financial Statements
include the accounts of Parkway Properties, Inc. and its majority owned
subsidiaries. The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses for the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from our estimates.
The accounting policies and estimates
used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements are more fully
described in the notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements. However, certain of our significant
accounting policies are considered critical accounting policies due to the
increased level of assumptions used or estimates made in determining their
impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
We consider our critical accounting
policies and estimates to be those used in the determination of the reported
amounts and disclosure related to the following:
(1) Impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and
(2) Allowance for doubtful accounts
Impairment
or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
Changes in the supply or demand of tenants for our properties could
impact our ability to fill available space.
Should a significant amount of available space exist for an extended
period, our investment in a particular office building may be impaired. We evaluate our real estate assets upon the
occurrence of significant adverse changes to assess whether any impairment
indicators are present that affect the recovery of the carrying amount.
Real estate assets are classified as
held for sale or held and used in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets". In
accordance with SFAS No. 144, we record assets held for sale at the lower of
carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. With respect to assets
classified as held and used, we recognize an impairment loss to the extent the
carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value.
In 2002, the Company recorded an
impairment loss on its office property in Greenville, South Carolina in the
amount of $1.6 million and on 11.856 acres of non-earning land in New Orleans,
Louisiana in the amount of $205,000.
The loss on the Greenville property was created largely by rental rate
decreases and current conditions within the market. The loss on the New Orleans land was computed based on market research
and comparable sales in the area and necessary to reflect the land at fair
value less cost to sell.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. Accounts receivable are reduced by an
allowance for amounts that may become uncollectible in the future. Our receivable balance is comprised
primarily of rents and operating expense recoveries due from tenants. Change in the supply of or demand for office
properties could impact our tenants' ability to honor their lease obligations,
which could in turn affect our recorded revenues and estimates of the
collectibility of our receivables.
Revenue from real estate rentals is recognized and accrued as earned on
a pro rata basis over the term of the lease.
We regularly evaluate the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful
accounts considering such factors as credit quality of our tenants, delinquency
of payment, historical trends and current economic conditions. We provide an allowance for doubtful
accounts for tenant balances that are over 90 days past due and for specific
tenant receivables for which collection is considered doubtful. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Funds From Operations and Funds Available for
Distribution
Management believes that funds from
operations ("FFO") is an appropriate measure of performance for
equity REITs and computes this measure in accordance with the National
Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts' ("NAREIT") definition
of FFO. We believe FFO is helpful to investors
as a supplemental measure that enhances the comparability of our operations by
adjusting net income for items not reflective of our principal and recurring
operations. In addition, FFO has
widespread acceptance and use within the REIT and analyst communities. Funds from operations is defined by NAREIT
as net income (computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles "GAAP"), excluding gains or losses from sales of property
and extraordinary items under GAAP, plus depreciation and amortization, and
after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships
and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect funds from operations on the same
basis. In 2002, NAREIT clarified that
FFO related to assets held for sale, sold or otherwise transferred and included
in results of discontinued operations should continue to be included in
consolidated FFO. This clarification is
effective January 1, 2002, and calculation of
FFO based on this clarification should be shown for all periods presented in financial statements or tables. We believe that in order to facilitate a clear understanding of our operating results, FFO should be examined in conjunction with the net income as presented in our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Funds from operations do not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and is not an indication of cash available to fund cash needs. Funds from operations should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indicator of the Company's operating performance or as an alternative to cash flow as a measure of liquidity.
The computation of funds available for
distribution ("FAD") is equal to FFO increased by amortization of
restricted stock grants and reduced by rental income from straight-line rents,
non-revenue enhancing capital expenditures for building improvements, tenant
improvements and leasing costs.
Adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures are calculated on the same
basis.
The following table presents a
reconciliation of the Company's net income to FFO and FAD for the years ended
December 31, 2002 and 2001 (in thousands):
|
Year Ended December 31 |
|
|
||
|
------------------------------ |
|
|
2002 |
2001 |
|
------------- |
------------- |
Net income...................................................................................... |
$29,512 |
$26,548 |
Adjustments to derive funds from operations: |
|
|
Extraordinary items........................................................................ |
833 |
1,302 |
Depreciation and amortization...................................................... |
27,412 |
23,788 |
Depreciation and amortization - discontinued operations.................. |
22 |
- |
Adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures............................... |
861 |
11 |
Preferred dividends................................................................ |
(5,797) |
(5,797) |
Convertible preferred dividends.................................................... |
(6,257) |
(3,249) |
(Gain) loss on real estate and joint venture interest......................... |
1,093 |
35 |
Amortization of deferred gains and other................................ |
(9) |
(5) |
|
------------ |
------------ |
Funds from operations................................................................ |
47,670 |
42,633 |
Adjustments to derive funds available for distribution: |
|
|
Amortization of restricted stock grants........................................ |
2,190 |
1,272 |
Straight-line rents....................................................................... |
(2,229) |
(1,992) |
Adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures.............................. |
(881) |
- |
Building improvements........................................................... |
(2,729) |
(2,472) |
Tenant improvements - new leases................................................ |
(6,251) |
(4,137) |
Tenant improvements - renewal leases.......................................... |
(3,979) |
(5,305) |
Leasing costs - new leases...................................................... |
(3,305) |
(1,896) |
Leasing costs - renewal leases..................................................... |
(1,445) |
(1,106) |
|
------------ |
------------ |
Funds available for distribution................................................... |
$29,041 |
$26,997 |
|
======== |
======== |
Inflation
In the last five years, inflation has
not had a significant impact on the Company because of the relatively low
inflation rate in the Company's geographic areas of operation. Most of the leases require the tenants to
pay their pro rata share of operating expenses, including common area
maintenance, real estate taxes and insurance, thereby reducing the Company's
exposure to increases in operating expenses resulting from inflation. In addition, the Company's leases typically
have three to seven year terms, which may enable the Company to replace
existing leases with new leases at a higher base rent if rents on the existing
leases are below the then-existing market rate.
Forward-Looking Statements
In addition to historical information, certain sections of this Form
10-K may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, such as those that are not in the present or past tense, that discuss the
Company's beliefs, expectations or intentions or those pertaining to the
Company's capital resources, profitability and portfolio performance and
estimates of market rental rates. Forward-looking statements involve
numerous risks and uncertainties. The following factors, among others
discussed herein and in the Company's filings under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, could cause actual results and future events to differ materially from
those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements:
defaults or non-renewal of leases, increased interest rates and operating costs,
failure to obtain necessary outside financing, difficulties in identifying
properties to acquire and in effecting acquisitions, failure to qualify as a
real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, environmental uncertainties, risks related to natural disasters,
financial market fluctuations, changes in real estate and zoning laws and
increases in real property tax rates. The success of the
Company also depends upon the trends of the economy, including interest rates, income tax laws, governmental regulation, legislation, population changes and those risk factors discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-K and in the Company's filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect management's analysis only as the date hereof. The Company assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements.
ITEM 7A. Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
See information appearing under
the caption "Liquidity" appearing in Item 7. "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations".
As of December 31, 2002, total
outstanding debt was approximately $351,716,000 of which $141,970,000 or 40.4%,
is variable rate debt. If market rates
of interest on the variable rate debt fluctuate by 10% (or approximately 42
basis points), the change in interest expense on the variable rate debt would
increase or decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $596,000
annually.
ITEM 8. Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements |
Page |
|
|
Report of Independent Auditors.................................................................................................. |
26 |
Consolidated Balance Sheets - as of December 31, 2002 and 2001......................................... |
27 |
Consolidated Statements of Income - for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000.... |
28 |
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity - for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 |
29 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 |
30 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements............................................................................ |
31 |
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation......................................................... |
48 |
Note to Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation............................................. |
50 |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Stockholders and Board of Directors
Parkway Properties, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Parkway
Properties, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the
related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002. Our audits also included the financial
statement schedule listed in the index under Item 15. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also
includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Parkway
Properties, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the
consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements
taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set
forth herein.
Ernst & Young LLP
Jackson,
Mississippi
January 31, 2003
PARKWAY PROPERTIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
December 31 |
December 31 |
|
2002 |
2001 |
|
---------------- |
------------------- |
Assets |
|
|
Real estate related investments: |
|
|
Office and parking properties.............................................................. |
$806,000 |
$875,889 |
Accumulated depreciation..................................................................... |
(99,449) |
(80,029) |
|
------------ |
------------ |
|
706,551 |
795,860 |
|
|
|
Land available for sale...................................................................... |
3,528 |
3,733 |
Note receivable from Moore Building Associates LP......................... |
5,996 |
6,942 |
Mortgage loans....................................................................................... |
869 |
877 |
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures....................................... |
15,640 |
416 |
|
------------ |
------------ |
|
732,584 |
807,828 |
|
|
|
Interest, rents receivable and other assets................................................ |
29,759 |
30,392 |
Cash and cash equivalents.......................................................................... |
1,594 |
2,392 |
|
------------ |
------------ |
Total assets........................................................................................... |
$763,937 |
$840,612 |
|
======== |
======== |
Liabilities |
|
|
Notes payable to banks........................................................................ |
$141,970 |
$126,044 |
Mortgage notes payable without recourse.............................................. |
209,746 |
304,985 |
Accounts payable and other liabilities........................................................ |
35,400 |
34,002 |
|
------------ |
------------ |
Total liabilities............................................................................................. |
387,116 |
465,031 |
|
------------- |
------------- |
Stockholders' Equity |
|
|
8.75% Series A Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 2,750,000 shares authorized |
|
|
and 2,650,000 shares issued and outstanding...................................... |
66,250 |
66,250 |
8.34% Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred stock, $.001 par value, |
|
|
2,142,857 shares authorized, issued and outstanding......................... |
75,000 |
75,000 |
Series C Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 400,000 shares authorized, |
|
|
no shares issued........................................................... |
- |
- |
Common stock, $.001 par value, 64,707,143 shares authorized, 9,385,420 |
|
|
and 9,249,954 shares issued and outstanding in 2002 and 2001, | ||
respectively. |
9 |
9 |
Excess stock, $.001 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized, no shares |
||
issued. |
- |
- |
Additional paid-in capital........................................................................... |
199,979 |
196,032 |
Unearned compensation........................................................................ |
- |
(2,190) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss........................................................ |
(170) |
(1,694) |
Retained earnings................................................................................... |
35,753 |
42,174 |
|
------------- |
------------- |
Total stockholders' equity...................................................................... |
376,821 |
375,581 |
|
------------- |
------------- |
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity................................................. |
$763,937 |
$840,612 |
|
======== |
======== |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
PARKWAY
PROPERTIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
Year Ended December 31 ---------------------------------------- |
||
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
------------- |
------------- |
------------- |
Revenues |
|
|
|
Income from office and parking properties................................... |
$152,442 |
$135,968 |
$118,970 |
Management company income...................................................... |
1,197 |
845 |
922 |
Interest on note receivable from Moore Building Associates LP...... |
895 |
873 |
805 |
Incentive management fee from Moore Building Associates LP...... |
325 |
316 |
191 |
Dividend income........................................................................... |
- |
495 |
1,205 |
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures.......................... |
824 |
62 |
47 |
Other income and deferred gains................................................ |
401 |
238 |
384 |
|
------------- |
------------- |
------------ |
|
156,084 |
138,797 |
122,524 |
|
------------- |
------------- |
------------ |
Expenses |
|
|
|
Office and parking properties: |
|
|
|
Operating expense.................................................................... |
65,942 |
57,465 |
49,397 |
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
Contractual......................................................................... |
18,766 |
20,279 |
16,195 |
Amortization of loan costs...................................................... |
240 |
247 |
176 |
Depreciation and amortization.................................................... |
27,412 |
23,788 |
19,651 |
Operating expense for other real estate properties.................................. |
34 |
39 |
60 |
Interest expense on bank notes: |
|
|
|
Contractual............................................................................... |
6,055 |
4,800 |
6,389 |
Amortization of loan costs......................................................... |
592 |
697 |
538 |
Management company expenses................................................. |
416 |
379 |
738 |
General and administrative.............................................................. |
5,029 |
4,861 |
3,951 |
|
------------- |
------------- |
------------- |
|
124,486 |
112,555 |
97,095 |
|
------------- |
------------- |
------------- |
Income before gain (loss), minority interest, discontinued |
|
|
|
operations and extraordinary item......................................... |
31,598 |
26,242 |
25,429 |
Gain (loss) on sale of joint venture interest, real estate and real estate equity securities |
(474) |
1,611 |
9,471 |
Impairment loss on office property....................................................... |
(1,594) |
- |
- |
Minority interest - unit holders........................................................... |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
|
------------- |
------------- |
------------- |
Income before discontinued operations and extraordinary item....... |
29,528 |
27,850 |
34,896 |
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations............................................. |
47 |
- |
- |
Gain on sale of real estate from discontinued operations.................... |
770 |
- |
- |
|
------------- |
------------- |
------------- |
Income before extraordinary item.................................................... |
30,345 |
27,850 |
34,896 |
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of mortgage notes payable..... |
(833) |
(1,302) |
- |
|
------------- |
------------- |
------------- |
Net income....................................................................................... |
29,512 |
26,548 |
34,896 |
Change in unrealized gain on real estate equity securities........................ |
- |
(821) |
821 |
Change in market value of interest rate swap........................................ |
1,524 |
(1,694) |
- |
|
------------- |
------------- |
------------- |
Comprehensive income.................................................................... |
$ 31,036 |
$ 24,033 |
$ 35,717 |
|
====== |
====== |
====== |
Net income available to common stockholders: |
|
|
|
Net income............................................................................................ |
$ 29,512 |
$ 26,548 |
$ 34,896 |
Dividends on preferred stock................................................................. |
(5,797) |
(5,797) |
(5,797) |
Dividends on convertible preferred stock............................................... |
(6,257) |
(3,249) |
- |
|
------------- |
------------- |
------------- |
Net income available to common stockholders............................... |
$ 17,458 |
$ 17,502 |
$ 29,099 |
|
====== |
====== |
====== |
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
Income excluding discontinued operations and extraordinary item...... |
$ 1.87 |
$ 2.01 |
$ 2.96 |
Discontinued operations................................................................. |
.09 |
- |
- |
Extraordinary item............................................................................. |
(.09) |
(.14) |
- |
|
------------- |
------------- |
------------- |
Net income........................................................................................... |
$ 1.87 |
$ 1.87 |
$ 2.96 |
|
====== |
====== |
====== |
Diluted: |
|
|
|
Income excluding discontinued operations and extraordinary item.......... |
$ 1.84 |
$ 1.99 |
$ 2.93 |
Discontinued operations................................................................... |
.09 |
- |
- |
Extraordinary item............................................................................. |
(.09) |
(.14) |
- |
|
------------- |
------------- |
------------- |
Net income......................................................................................... |
$ 1.84 |
$ 1.85 |
$ 2.93 |
|
====== |
====== |
====== |
Dividends per common share....................................................... |
$ 2.56 |
$ 2.45 |
$ 2.12 |
|
====== |
====== |
====== |
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
Basic................................................................................................. |
9,312 |
9,339 |
9,825 |
|
====== |
====== |
====== |
Diluted............................................................................................... |
9,480 |
9,442 |
9,926 |
|
====== |
====== |
====== |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
PARKWAY PROPERTIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(In thousands)
|
Year Ended December 31 |
||
|
------------------------------------------------------ |
||
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
------------------ |
------------------ |
------------------ |
8.75% Series A Preferred stock, $.001 par value |
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year........................ |
$ 66,250 |
$ 66,250 |
$ 66,250 |
|
-------------- |
-------------- |
-------------- |
Balance at end of year...................................... |
66,250 |
66,250 |
66,250 |
|
-------------- |
-------------- |
-------------- |
8.34% Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred stock, $.001 par value |
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year............................ |
75,000 |
- |
- |
Shares issued - stock offerings................... |
- |
75,000 |
- |
|
-------------- |
-------------- |
-------------- |
Balance at end of year...................................... |
75,000 |
75,000 |
- |
|
-------------- |
-------------- |
-------------- |
Common stock, $.001 par value |
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year............................. |
9 |
10 |
10 |
Purchase of Company stock....................... |
- |
(1) |
- |
|
-------------- |
-------------- |
-------------- |
Balance at end of year..................................... |
9 |
9 |
10 |
|
-------------- |
-------------- |
-------------- |
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year.......................... |
196,032 |
214,568 |
220,526 |
Stock options exercised................................ |
2,996 |
1,343 |
130 |
Shares issued in lieu of Directors' fees......... |
62 |
55 |
70 |
Restricted shares issued.............................. |
- |
60 |
262 |
Reclassification for issuance of restricted shares |
- |
- |
(843) |
Shares issued - employee excellence |
|
|
|
recognition program............................... |
3 |
2 |
- |
Shares issued - DRIP Plan |
1,310 |
- |
- |
Shares issued - stock offerings................... |
- |
(1,994) |
- |
Purchase of Company stock....................... |
(424) |
(18,002) |
(5,577) |
|
--------------- |
--------------- |
-------------- |
Balance at end of year................................... |
199,979 |
196,032 |
214,568 |
|
--------------- |
--------------- |
-------------- |
Unearned compensation |
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year.......................... |
(2,190) |
(3,402) |
(4,923) |
Restricted shares issued........................... |
- |
(60) |
(262) |
Reclassification for issuance of restricted shares |
- |
- |
843 |
Amortization of unearned compensation... |
2,190 |
1,272 |
940 |
|
-------------- |
-------------- |
-------------- |
Balance at end of year................................. |
- |
(2,190) |
(3,402) |
|
-------------- |
-------------- |
-------------- |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year.......................... |
(1,694) |
821 |
- |
Change in net unrealized gain (loss) on real |
|
|
|
estate equity securities.......................... |
- |
(821) |
821 |
Change in market value of interest rate swap. |
1,524 |
(1,694) |
- |
|
-------------- |
-------------- |
-------------- |
Balance at end of year.................................... |
(170) |
(1,694) |
821 |
|
-------------- |
-------------- |
-------------- |
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year.......................... |
42,174 |
47,502 |
39,201 |
Net income................................................ |
29,512 |
26,548 |
34,896 |
Preferred stock dividends declared........... |
(5,797) |
(5,797) |
(5,797) |
Convertible preferred stock dividends declared |
(6,257) |
(3,249) |
- |
Common stock dividends declared................. |
(23,879) |
(22,830) |
(20,798) |
|
-------------- |
-------------- |
-------------- |
Balance at end of year.................................. |
35,753 |
42,174 |
47,502 |
|
-------------- |
-------------- |
-------------- |
Total stockholders' equity................................ |
$376,821 |
$375,581 |
$325,749 |
|
========= |
========= |
========= |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
PARKWAY
PROPERTIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
Year Ended December 31 |
||
|
--------------------------------------------------- |
||
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
----------------- |
----------------- |
----------------- |
Operating activities |
|
|
|
Net income............................................... |
$ 29,512 |
$ 26,548 |
$ 34,896 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash |
|
|
|
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization................. |
27,412 |
23,788 |
19,651 |
Depreciation and amortization - |
|
|
|
discontinued operations....................... |
22 |
- |
- |
Amortization of loan costs......................... |
832 |
944 |
714 |
Amortization of unearned compensation..... |
2,190 |
1,272 |
940 |
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment |
|
|
|
of debt.............................................. |
833 |
1,302 |
- |
(Gain) loss on real estate available for sale, office |
|
|
|
property and real estate equity securities.... |
1,029 |
(1,611) |
(9,471) |
Loss on sale of joint venture interest.............. |
269 |
- |
- |
Equity in earnings of consolidated joint ventures |
(824) |
(62) |
(47) |
Other......................................................... |
(11) |
(8) |
(22) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
Increase in receivables and other assets.... |
(5,150) |
(9,617) |
(3,947) |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable |
|
|
|
andaccrued expenses......... |
7,415 |
9,892 |
(4,916) |
|
--------------- |
--------------- |
--------------- |
Cash provided by operating activities............ |
63,529 |
52,448 |
37,798 |
|
--------------- |
--------------- |
--------------- |
Investing activities |
|
|
|
Payments received on mortgage loans................. |
8 |
6 |
9 |
Net decrease in note receivable from |
|
|
|
Moore Building Associates LP................... |
946 |
1,921 |
9,495 |
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures... |
1,641 |
34 |
20 |
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture...... |
(1,663) |
- |
- |
Purchases of real estate related investments......... |
(97,823) |
(213,847) |
(16,499) |
Purchases of real estate equity securities.......... |
- |
- |
(32,588) |
Proceeds from sales of joint venture interest, real |
|
|
|
estate and real estate equity securities........... |
58,602 |
29,503 |
49,883 |
Real estate development................................. |
(230) |
(42) |
(8,240) |
Improvements to real estate related investments... |
(20,063) |
(15,726) |
(14,274) |
|
--------------- |
--------------- |
--------------- |
Cash used in investing activities................... |
(58,582) |
(198,151) |
(12,194) |
|
--------------- |
--------------- |
--------------- |
Financing activities |
|
|
|
Principal payments on mortgage notes payable... |
(20,840) |
(26,485) |
(10,266) |
Net proceeds from (payments on) bank borrowings |
17,450 |
42,468 |
(4,758) |
Proceeds from long-term financing.................. |
29,975 |
106,000 |
21,000 |
Prepayment premium on early extinguishment |
|
|
|
of debt............... |
(713) |
(1,102) |
- |
Stock options exercised.................................... |
2,996 |
1,343 |
130 |
Dividends paid on common stock.................... |
(23,445) |
(22,416) |
(20,456) |
Dividends paid on preferred stock.................... |
(12,054) |
(7,481) |
(5,797) |
Purchase of Company stock............................. |
(424) |
(18,003) |
(5,577) |
Proceeds from DRIP Plan.................................. |
1,310 |
- |
- |
Proceeds from stock offerings......................... |
- |
73,006 |
- |
|
--------------- |
--------------- |
--------------- |
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(5,745) |
147,330 |
(25,724) |
|
--------------- |
--------------- |
--------------- |
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(798) |
1,627 |
(120) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
2,392 |
765 |
885 |
|
--------------- |
--------------- |
--------------- |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year...... |
$ 1,594 |
$ 2,392 |
$ 765 |
|
========= |
========= |
========= |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2002
NOTE A - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of Parkway Properties, Inc. ("Parkway" or
"the Company") and its majority owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and
accounts have been eliminated.
Basis
of presentation
The accompanying financial statements
reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for
a fair statement of the results for the periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal
recurring nature. The financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the annual report and the notes
thereto.
Effective January 1, 1997, the
Company elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (REIT) under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
The Company completed its
reorganization into the UPREIT (Umbrella Partnership REIT) structure effective
January 1, 1998. The Company anticipates that the UPREIT structure will enable
it to pursue additional investment opportunities by having the ability to offer
tax-advantaged operating partnership units to property owners in exchange for
properties.
Business
The Company's operations are
exclusively in the real estate industry, principally the operation, management,
and ownership of office buildings.
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly
liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased
to be cash equivalents.
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures
As of December 31, 2002, Parkway has
two investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, which are accounted for using
the equity method of accounting.
Parkway's investments in unconsolidated joint ventures consist of a 50%
interest in Wink-Parkway Partnership and a 30% interest in Parkway 233 North
Michigan, LLC. We have a
non-controlling interest in these investments and account for our interest
using the equity method of accounting.
Therefore, we report our share of income and losses based on our
ownership interest in these entities.
We classify our interests as non-controlling when we hold less than a
majority voting interest in the entity.
Real estate properties
Real estate properties are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation.
Cost includes the carrying amount of the Company's investment plus any
additional consideration paid, liabilities assumed, costs of securing title (not
to exceed fair market value in the aggregate) and improvements made subsequent
to acquisition. Depreciation of buildings is computed using the
straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of 40 years.
Depreciation of tenant improvements, including personal property, is computed
using the straight-line method over the term of the
lease involved. Maintenance and repair expenses are charged to expense as incurred, while improvements are capitalized and depreciated in accordance with the useful lives outlined above. Geographically, the Company's properties are concentrated in the Southeastern and Southwestern United States and Chicago.
The Company evaluates its real estate
assets upon occurrence of significant adverse changes in their operations to
assess whether any impairment indicators are present that affect the recovery
of the carrying amount. Real estate assets
are classified as held for sale or held and used in accordance with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144, "Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets". In accordance with SFAS No. 144, we record
assets held for sale at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to
sell. With respect to assets classified
as held and used, we recognize and impairment loss to the extent the carrying
amount is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value.
Management continually evaluates the
Company's office buildings and the markets where the properties are located to
ensure that these buildings continue to meet their investment criteria. During 1998, management implemented a self
management strategy for the Company's office buildings which requires the
Company to have minimum square footage in an area in order for the strategy to
be cost effective. If the office
properties no longer meet management's investment criteria or the management of
the building is not cost effective, management may consider a sale of the
office property. If such a sale becomes
probable, the office property is classified as held for sale.
Gains from sales of real estate are
recognized based on the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards ("SFAS") No. 66 which require upon closing, the transfer of
rights of ownership to the purchaser, receipt from the purchaser of an adequate
cash down payment and adequate continuing investment by the purchaser. If the requirements for recognizing gains
have not been met, the sale and related costs are recorded, but the gain is
deferred and recognized generally on the installment method of accounting as
collections are received.
Management fee income and leasing and
brokerage commissions are recorded in income as earned. Such fees on Company-owned properties are
eliminated in consolidation.
Revenue from real estate rentals is
recognized and accrued as earned on a pro rata basis over the term of the
lease.
Non-core assets (see Note F) are
carried at the lower of cost or fair value minus estimated costs to sell. Operating real estate held for investment is
stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. In 2002, an impairment loss of $205,000 was recorded on 11.856
acres of land in New Orleans, Louisiana.
The loss on the land was computed based on market research and
comparable sales in the area.
Real estate equity securities
Real estate equity securities owned
by the Company, if any, are categorized as available-for-sale securities, as
defined by SFAS No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and
Equity Securities" and are reflected at market. Net unrealized gains and losses are reflected in comprehensive
income as a separate component of stockholders' equity until realized. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, Parkway
did not own any real estate equity securities.
Dividend income is recognized on the
accrual basis based on the number of shares owned as of the dividend record
date.
Interest income recognition
Interest is generally accrued monthly
based on the outstanding loan balances.
Recognition of interest income is discontinued whenever, in the
opinion of management, the collectibility of such income becomes doubtful. After a loan is classified as non-earning,
interest is recognized as income when received in cash.
Amortization
Debt origination costs are deferred
and amortized using a method that approximates the interest method over the
term of the loan. Leasing costs
are deferred and amortized using the straight-line method over the term of
the respective lease.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company follows SFAS No. 133
"Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" and
recognizes all derivative instruments on the balance sheet at their fair
value. Changes in the fair value of
derivatives are recorded each period in current earnings or other comprehensive
income, depending on whether a derivative is designated as part of a hedge
transaction and, if it is, the type of hedge transaction. The ineffective portion of the hedge, if
any, is immediately recognized in earnings.
Stock based compensation
The Company grants stock options for
a fixed number of shares to employees and directors with an exercise price
equal to or above the fair value of the shares at the date of grant. The Company accounts for stock option
grants in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees" (the intrinsic value method), and
accordingly, recognizes no compensation expense for the stock option
grants. The following table illustrates
the effect on net income and earnings per share if the company had applied the
fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based employee compensation.
|
Year Ended December 31 |
||
|
--------------------------------------- |
||
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
---------- |
---------- |
----------- |
Net income available to common stockholders................................. |
$17,458 |
$17,502 |
$29,099 |
Stock based employee compensation costs assuming fair value method.. |
(763) |
(1,083) |
(887) |
|
---------- |
---------- |
----------- |
Pro forma net income available to common stockholders............... |
$16,695 |
$16,419 |
$28,212 |
|
====== |
====== |
====== |
Pro forma net income per common share: |
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders.............................. |
$ 1.87 |
$ 1.87 |
$ 2.96 |
Stock based employee compensation costs assuming fair value method |
(.08) |
(.11) |
(.09) |
|
---------- |
---------- |
----------- |
Pro forma net income per common share................................. |
$ 1.79 |
$ 1.76 |
$ 2.87 |
|
====== |
====== |
====== |
Diluted: |
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders.............................. |
$ 1.84 |
$ 1.85 |
$ 2.93 |
Stock based employee compensation costs assuming fair value method |
(.08) |
(.11) |
(.09) |
|
---------- |
---------- |
----------- |
Pro forma net income per common share.................................... |
$ 1.76 |
$ 1.74 |
$ 2.84 |
|
====== |
====== |
====== |
The Company also accounts for
restricted stock in accordance with APB No. 25 and accordingly, compensation
expense is recognized over the expected vesting period.
Income taxes
The Company is a REIT for federal
income tax purposes. A corporate REIT
is a legal entity that holds real estate assets, and through distributions to
stockholders, is permitted to reduce or avoid the payment of Federal income
taxes at the corporate level. To
maintain qualification as a REIT, the Company is subject to a number of
organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it
currently distribute to stockholders at least 90% of its annual REIT taxable
income.
Net Income Per Common Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is
computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the year. In arriving at income available to common
stockholders, preferred stock dividends are deducted. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if dilutive
operating partnership units, dilutive employee stock options and warrants and
dilutive 8.34% Series B cumulative convertible preferred stock were exercised
or converted into common stock that then shared in the earnings of Parkway.
The computation of diluted EPS is as follows:
|
Year Ended December 31 |
||
|
--------------------------------------- |
||
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
------------- |
------------- |
------------- |
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
||
Numerator: |
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net income |
|
|
|
available to common stockholders......................................... |
$17,458 |
$17,502 |
$29,099 |
|
====== |
====== |
====== |
Denominator: |
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares............................ |
9,312 |
9,339 |
9,825 |
|
|
|
|
Effect of employee stock options and warrants....................... |
168 |
103 |
101 |
|
--------- |
--------- |
--------- |
Diluted weighted average shares............................................. |
9,480 |
9,442 |
9,926 |
|
====== |
====== |
====== |
Diluted earnings per share................................................... |
$ 1.84 |
$ 1.85 |
$ 2.93 |
|
====== |
====== |
====== |
The computation of diluted EPS did
not assume the conversion of the 8.34% Series B cumulative convertible
preferred stock because their inclusion would have been antidilutive.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been
made in the 2001 and 2000 consolidated financial statements to conform to the
2002 classifications with no impact on previously reported net income or
stockholders' equity.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In the first quarter of 2002, the
Company adopted SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal
of Long-Lived Assets". SFAS No.
144 supersedes SFAS No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived
Assets to Be Disposed Of", however, it retains the fundamental provisions
of SFAS No 121 related to the recognition and measurement of the impairment of
long-lived assets to be "held and used". In addition, SFAS No. 144 provides more guidance on estimating
cash flows when performing a recoverability test, requires that a long-lived
asset to be disposed of other than by sale (e.g., abandoned) be classified as
"held and used" until it is disposed of and establishes more
restrictive criteria to classify an asset as "held for sale." The adoption of SFAS No. 144 had no effect
on the Company's consolidated results of operations or financial position.
In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 62, Amendment of
FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections". SFAS No. 145 will require gains and losses
on extinguishments of debt to be classified as income or loss from continuing
operations rather than as extraordinary items as previously required under SFAS
No. 4 unless the extinguishment qualifies as an extraordinary item under the
provisions of APB Opinion No. 30. SFAS
No. 145 also amends SFAS No.13 to require certain modifications to capital
leases to be treated as a sale-leaseback and modifies the accounting for
sub-leases when the original lessee remains a secondary obligor (or
guarantor). The company is required to
adopt SFAS No. 145 in the first quarter of 2003. Management does not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 145
will have a significant effect on the Company's consolidated results of
operations or financial position.
Note B - Investment in Office and
Parking Properties
At December 31, 2002, Parkway
owned or had a direct interest in 54 office and parking properties located in
nine states with an aggregate of 8,525,000 square feet of leasable space. The purchase price of office properties
acquired during the year ended December 31, 2002 is as follows:
|
Cost |
Market Location |
(in thousands) |
----------------------- |
------------------ |
Phoenix, AZ........................ |
$70,355 |
Houston, TX................... |
27,186 |
|
---------- |
|
$97,541 |
|
====== |
The unaudited pro forma effect on the
Company's results of operations of the 2002 purchases as if the purchases had
occurred on January 1, 2001 is as follows (in thousands, except per share
data):
|
Year Ended |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
------------------------- |
|
|
2002 |
2001 |
|
------------ |
------------- |
Revenues.................................. |
$ 9,334 |
$20,433 |
Net income..................... |
$ 3,783 |
$ 8,290 |
Basic earnings per share.. |
$ .41 |
$ .89 |
Diluted earnings per share..... |
$ .40 |
$ .88 |
Pro forma results do not purport to
be indicative of actual results had the purchase been made at January 1, 2001,
or the results that may occur in the future.
On May 30, 2002, Parkway sold a 70%
interest in its investment in Parkway 233 North Michigan LLC (the "Chicago
Joint Venture"), a subsidiary limited liability company that owns the 233
North Michigan Avenue building in Chicago, to an affiliate of Investcorp
International, Inc. ("Investcorp") for a price equal to approximately
70% of the Company's original purchase price of the property plus all capital
costs since it acquired the property in June 2001. Parkway continues to provide management and leasing for the
building on a day-to-day basis. In
connection with the sale, Parkway recognized a $250,000 acquisition fee in
accordance with the terms of the joint venture agreement. The Company recorded a loss on the sale of
the 70% interest in the Chicago Joint Venture of $269,000.
Prior to the Chicago Joint Venture,
the subsidiary that owned 233 North Michigan Avenue was capitalized with equity
of approximately $72 million and a 10-year first mortgage with a balance of
approximately $105 million as of May 30, 2002.
The first mortgage remained in place as an obligation of the Chicago
Joint Venture. Parkway received net
cash proceeds of approximately $55 million from the sale and used the proceeds
to purchase new properties and to reduce short-term borrowings under the
Company's lines of credit. The Chicago
Joint Venture is accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
On May 31, 2002, the Company closed
on the sale of its 96,000 square foot office property in Indianapolis, Indiana
for net proceeds of $3,192,000. The
Company recorded a gain for financial reporting purposes of $770,000 on the
sale. The net proceeds from the sale
were used to reduce amounts outstanding on the Company's lines of credit.
In 2002, the Company recorded an
impairment loss on its office property in Greenville, South Carolina in the
amount of $1.6 million. The loss on the
Greenville property was created largely by rental rate decreases and current
conditions within the market. The
estimated fair value of the Greenville property was determined based upon
current prices of similar properties in the market area.
The following is a schedule by year
of future approximate minimum rental receipts under noncancelable leases
for office buildings owned as of December 31, 2002 (in thousands):
2003.................................................. |
$119,421 |
2004.................................................. |
107,374 |
2005.................................................. |
86,608 |
2006.................................................. |
66,700 |
2007.................................................. |
50,788 |
Subsequently.................................. |
141,452 |
|
------------ |
|
$572,343 |
|
====== |
Note C - Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
In
addition to the 54 office and parking properties owned directly, the Company is
also invested in two joint ventures with unrelated investors. Parkway retained a minority interest of 30%
in one joint venture and 50% in the other.
These investments are accounted for using the equity method of
accounting, as Parkway does not control either of these joint ventures. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of
the joint ventures are not included on Parkway's consolidated balance sheets as
of December 31, 2002 and 2001.
Information relating to these consolidated joint ventures is detailed
below.
Parkway owns a 30% interest in the
Chicago Joint Venture. The carrying
amount of the joint venture interest at December 31, 2002 was $15,209,000. In addition, the Company owns a 50% interest
in an office property in New Orleans, Louisiana known as the Wink
Building. The building is 100% leased
and occupied by the other 50% partner.
The carrying amount of the joint venture interest at December 31, 2002
and 2001 was $431,000 and $416,000, respectively.
Balance sheet information for the unconsolidated joint ventures is summarized below as of December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001 (in thousands):
Balance Sheet Information |
||||||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||||||
|
December 31, 2002 |
December 31, 2001 |
||||
|
------------------------------------- |
------------------------------------ |
||||
|
233 North |
Wink |
Combined |
233 North |
Wink |
Combined |
|
Michigan |
Building |
Total |
Michigan |
Building |
Total |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures (at 100%): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate, Net................................ |
$172,073 |
$1,303 |
$173,376 |
$ - |
$1,328 |
$1,328 |
Other Assets...................................... |
16,416 |
159 |
16,575 |
- |
177 |
177 |
|
------------ |
-------- |
------------ |
-------- |
-------- |
-------- |
Total Assets................................... |
$188,489 |
$1,462 |
$189,951 |
$ - |
$1,505 |
$1,505 |
|
====== |
==== |
====== |
==== |
==== |
==== |
Mortgage Debt................................ |
$103,741 |
$ 596 |
$104,337 |
$ - |
$ 661 |
$ 661 |
Other Liabilities.............................. |
11,630 |
2 |
11,632 |
- |
15 |
15 |
Partners'/Shareholders' Equity........ |
73,118 |
864 |
73,982 |
- |
829 |
829 |
|
------------ |
-------- |
------------ |
-------- |
-------- |
-------- |
Total Liabilities and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners'/Shareholders' Equity |
$188,489 |
$1,462 |
$189,951 |
$ - |
$1,505 |
$1,505 |
|
====== |
==== |
====== |
==== |
==== |
==== |
Parkway's Share of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate, Net............................ |
$ 51,622 |
$ 652 |
$ 52,274 |
$ - |
$ 664 |
$ 664 |
|
====== |
==== |
====== |
==== |
==== |
==== |
Mortgage Debt............................ |
$ 31,122 |
$ 298 |
$ 31,420 |
$ - |
$ 331 |
$ 331 |
|
====== |
==== |
====== |
==== |
==== |
==== |
Net Investment in Joint Ventures..... |
$ 15,209 |
$ 431 |
$ 15,640 |
$ - |
$ 416 |
$ 416 |
|
====== |
==== |
====== |
==== |
==== |
==== |
Income
statement information for the unconsolidated joint ventures is summarized below
for the years ending December 31, 2002 and 2001 (in thousands):
Results of Operations |
||||||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||||||
|
For the Year Ended |
For the Year Ended |
||||
December 31, 2002 |
December 31, 2001 |
|||||
|
---------------------------------- |
---------------------------------- |
||||
|
233 North |
Wink |
Combined |
233 North |
Wink |
Combined |
|
Michigan |
Building |
Total |
Michigan |
Building |
Total |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures (at 100%): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues....................................................... |
$19,537 |
$304 |
$19,841 |
$ - |
$284 |
$284 |
Operating Expenses..................................... |
(8,646) |
(89) |
(8,735) |
- |
(77) |
(77) |
|
----------- |
------- |
----------- |
----------- |
-------- |
------- |
Net Operating Income.................... |
10,891 |
215 |
11,106 |
- |
207 |
207 |
Interest Expense............................ |
(5,469) |
(54) |
(5,523) |
- |
(60) |
(60) |
Loan Cost Amortization................. |
(70) |
(3) |
(73) |
- |
(3) |
(3) |
Depreciation and Amortization........ |
(2,831) |
(23) |
(2,854) |
- |
(22) |
(22) |
|
----------- |
-------- |
------------ |
----------- |
-------- |
-------- |
Net Income.................................... |
$ 2,521 |
$135 |
$ 2,656 |
$ - |
$122 |
$122 |
|
====== |
==== |
====== |
====== |
==== |
==== |
Parkway's Share of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures: |
|
|
|
|
||
Net Income........................................ |
$ 756 |
$ 68 |
$ 824 |
$ - |
$ 62 |
$ 62 |
|
====== |
==== |
====== |
====== |
==== |
==== |
Interest Expense.............................. |
$ 1,641 |
$ 27 |
$ 1,668 |
$ - |
$ 30 |
$ 30 |
|
====== |
==== |
====== |
====== |
==== |
==== |
Loan Cost Amortization................ |
$ 21 |
$ 2 |
$ 23 |
$ - |
$ 2 |
$ 2 |
|
====== |
==== |
====== |
====== |
==== |
==== |
Depreciation and Amortization............. |
$ 849 |
$ 12 |
$ 861 |
$ - |
$ 11 |
$ 11 |
|
====== |
==== |
====== |
====== |
==== |
==== |
Parkway's
share of the unconsolidated joint ventures' debt is as follows for December 31,
2002 and 2001 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance |
||
|
|
|
Monthly |
--------------------------- |
||
Description |
Fixed Rate |
Maturity |
Debt Service |
12/31/02 |
12/31/01 |
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||||||
Mortgage Notes Payable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
233 North Michigan Avenue............ |
7.350% |
07/11/11 |
$ 229 |
$ 31,122 |
$ - |
|
Wink Building................................. |
8.625% |
07/01/09 |
5 |
298 |
331 |
|
|
|
|
---------- |
------------ |
---------- |
|
|
|
|
$ 234 |
$ 31,420 |
$ 331 |
|
|
|
|
====== |
======= |
====== |
|
Weighted Average Interest Rate at End of Period |
|
|
7.362% |
8.625% |
||
|
|
|
|
======= |
====== |
|
Parkway's
share of the scheduled principal payments on mortgage debt for the
unconsolidated joint ventures for each of the next five years and thereafter
through maturity as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
Scheduled Amortization |
||
|
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
233 North |
Wink |
|
Schedule of Mortgage Maturities by Year: |
Michigan |
Building |
Total |
|
---------------------------------------- |
||
2003......................................................................... |
$ 522 |
$ 35 |
$ 557 |
2004......................................................................... |
561 |
38 |
599 |
2005......................................................................... |
602 |
42 |
644 |
2006......................................................................... |
647 |
46 |
693 |
2007......................................................................... |
695 |
50 |
745 |
Thereafter.............................................................. |
28,095 |
87 |
28,182 |
|
---------- |
------ |
---------- |
|
$31,122 |
$298 |
$31,420 |
|
====== |
==== |
====== |
Note D - Note Receivable from Moore Building Associates LP
The redevelopment of the Toyota
Center, formerly the Moore Building, was substantially completed as of June 30,
2000. This building is owned by Moore
Building Associates LP (the "Partnership"), which added an
institutional investor, Banc of America Historic Ventures, LLC, in March 2000,
subject to certain conditions of the Partnership agreement pertaining to the
completion of the building and realization of the historic tax credits. During the second quarter of 2000, the
majority of these conditions were met and management determined that the
certification of the historic tax credits was probable. With the conditions for the institutional
investor ownership in the Partnership being met, the Company's ownership
interest became less than 1%.
Therefore, the Company deconsolidated the Partnership resulting in an
increase of $18,358,000 in a note receivable from the Partnership and a
corresponding decrease in real estate development. Also, during the second quarter of 2000, the Partnership
completed a $15,000,000 permanent financing of the Toyota Center with the
proceeds used to reduce the Company's note receivable from the
Partnership. The Company in turn
reduced short-term borrowings under its bank lines of credit. At December 31, 2002, the note receivable
from the Partnership totaled $5,996,000 and bears interest at 13%.
Note E - Real Estate Equity Securities
During 2001, the Company sold its
equity interests in other publicly-traded REITS held through its RSVP Program
for net proceeds of $24,051,000. A net
non-recurring gain of $1,591,000 was recognized on the sales in 2001. The RSVP Program is the Company's initiative
to take advantage of discounted REIT valuations by purchasing common equity in
other REITs. Parkway did not own any
real estate equity securities at December 31, 2002 and 2001.
Note F - Non-Core Assets
At December 31, 2002, Parkway's
investment in non-core assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
Size |
Location |
Book Value |
--------------------------------- |
-------------------- |
----------------- |
12 acres................................. |
New Orleans, LA |
$1,807 |
17 acres............................... |
Charlotte, NC |
1,721 |
Mortgage loans....................... |
Texas |
869 |
|
|
-------- |
|
|
$4,397 |
|
|
===== |
In 2002, the Company recorded an
impairment loss of $205,000 on the land in New Orleans, Louisiana. The loss was computed based on market
research and comparable sales in the area.
There were three mortgage loans
outstanding at December 31, 2002 secured by residential real estate and a
retail center.
Note G - Notes Payable
Notes payable to banks
At December 31, 2002, the Company had
$141,970,000 outstanding under two bank lines of credit and a term loan. The lines of credit include a $15,000,000
line of credit with PNC Bank (the "$15 million line"), and a
$135,000,000 line of credit with a consortium of 13 banks with J.P. Morgan
Chase & Co. serving as the lead agent (the "$135 million
line"). The interest rates on the
lines of credit are equal to the 30-day LIBOR rate plus 112.5 to 137.5 basis
points, depending upon overall Company leverage. The weighted average interest rates on the $15 million line and
the $135 million line were 2.68% and 4.98% at December 31, 2002, respectively.
On June 4, 2002, Parkway entered into
a Credit Agreement (the "Credit Agreement") with JP Morgan Chase
Bank, as Administrative Agent, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Syndication
Agent, and other banks as participants.
The Credit Agreement, among other things, provided for a new $35 million
one-year term loan facility (the "Term Loan") of which $35 million
was drawn upon and paid to Parkway as of June 4, 2002. Excluding bank fees and closing costs, the
Term Loan bears interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 112.5 to 137.5 basis
points, depending on Parkway's leverage.
Accrued and unpaid interest under the Term Loan is payable monthly with
the final interest payment as well as the entire principal amount outstanding
thereunder due and payable on June 4, 2003.
The interest rate on the Term Loan was 2.81% at December 31, 2002.
Covenants related to the $15 million
line, the $135 million line and the Term Loan include requirements for
maintenance of minimum tangible net worth, fixed charge coverage, interest
coverage, and debt service coverage.
The lines also establish limits on the Company's indebtedness and
dividends.
The Company's interest rate hedge
contracts are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
Type of |
Notional |
Maturity |
|
Fixed |
---------------------- |
|
Hedge |
Amount |
Date |
Reference Rate |
Rate |
2002 |
2001 |
--------------- |
------------ |
------------ |
------------------------------- |
-------- |
-------- |
---------- |
Swap |
$51,000 |
01/15/03 |
1-Month LIBOR |
5.44% |
$(170) |
$(1,694) |
Reverse Swap |
$ 5,300 |
07/15/06 |
1-Month LIBOR + 3.455% |
8.08% |
325 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
-------- |
---------- |
|
|
|
|
|
$155 |
$(1,694) |
|
|
|
|
|
===== |
===== |
The Company designated the swap as a
hedge of the variable interest rates on the Company's borrowings under the $135
million line. Accordingly, changes in
the fair value of the swap are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive
income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings.
During 2002, the Company entered into
a reverse swap interest rate contract.
The effect of the reverse swap is to convert a fixed rate mortgage note
payable to a variable rate. The Company
does not hold or issue these types of derivative contracts for trading or
speculative purposes.
The $15 million line is unsecured and is expected to fund the daily cash
requirements of the Company's treasury management system. This line of
credit matures August 3, 2003 and has a current interest rate equal to the
30-day LIBOR rate plus 130 basis points. The Company paid a facility fee
of $15,000 (10 basis points)
upon closing of the loan agreement. Under the $15 million line, the Company does not pay annual administration fees or fees on the unused portion of the line.
The $135 million line is also
unsecured and is expected to fund acquisitions of additional investments. This line of credit matures June 28, 2004
and has a current interest rate equal to the LIBOR rate plus 137.5 basis
points. The Company paid a facility fee
of $225,000 (16.67 basis points) and origination fees of $464,000 (41.85 basis
points) upon closing of the loan agreement and pays an annual administration
fee of $37,500. The Company also pays
fees on the unused portion of the line based upon overall Company leverage,
with the current rate set at 25 basis points.
The Term Loan is unsecured and is
expected to fund acquisitions of additional investments. The Term Loan matures June 4, 2003 and has a
current interest rate equal to the LIBOR rate plus 137.5 basis points. The Company paid facility and origination
fees of $170,000 (48.57 basis points) upon closing of the loan agreement. The Company does not pay annual
administration fees or fees on the unused portion of the Term Loan.
Mortgage notes payable without recourse
A summary of fixed rate mortgage
notes payable at December 31, 2002 and 2001 which are non-recourse to the
Company, is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
Note Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
---------------------- |
|
|
Interest |
Monthly |
Maturity |
Of |
December 31 |
|
Office Property |
Rate |
Payment |
Date |
Collateral |
2002 |
2001 |
--------------------------------------- |
----------- |
----------- |
----------- |
----------- |
----------- |
----------- |
Moorefield I (1)............................ |
7.625% |
$ - |
03/01/03 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ 1,785 |
Lakewood II................................. |
8.080% |
66 |
07/15/06 |
10,256 |
5,624 |
5,652 |
Teachers Insurance and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annuity Association (12 properties) |
6.945% |
869 |
07/01/08 |
157,620 |
78,051 |
82,487 |
Honeywell.................................... |
8.125% |
89 |
10/10/08 |
14,561 |
5,311 |
5,922 |
Capitol Center............................... |
8.180% |
165 |
09/01/10 |
38,260 |
20,367 |
20,663 |
One Jackson Place......................... |
7.850% |
152 |
10/10/10 |
17,897 |
14,742 |
15,383 |
IBM Building (1).......................... |
7.700% |
- |
03/01/11 |
- |
- |
3,546 |
SunCom Building........................ |
7.000% |
59 |
06/01/11 |
11,785 |
4,446 |
4,826 |
233 North Michigan (2)..................... |
7.350% |
- |
07/11/11 |
- |
- |
105,359 |
400 North Belt................................. |
8.250% |
65 |
08/01/11 |
9,389 |
4,789 |
5,163 |
Woodbranch............................. |
8.250% |
32 |
08/01/11 |
4,248 |
2,306 |
2,486 |
Falls Pointe (1)............................. |
8.375% |
- |
01/01/12 |
- |
- |
5,112 |
Roswell North........................... |
8.375% |
33 |
01/01/12 |
4,681 |
2,515 |
2,695 |
Bank of America Plaza................. |
7.100% |
146 |
05/10/12 |
29,883 |
20,273 |
- |
One Park 10 Plaza.................... |
7.100% |
64 |
06/01/12 |
7,163 |
9,478 |
- |
BB&T Financial Center.............. |
7.300% |
137 |
11/10/12 |
21,520 |
11,674 |
12,439 |
First Tennessee Plaza.................. |
7.170% |
136 |
12/15/12 |
28,982 |
11,647 |
12,417 |
Morgan Keegan Tower.................. |
7.620% |
163 |
10/01/19 |
33,046 |
18,523 |
19,050 |
|
|
-------- |
|
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
|
|
$2,176 |
|
$389,291 |
$209,746 |
$304,985 |
|
|
===== |
|
====== |
====== |
====== |
(1) During 2002, an extraordinary
loss on early extinguishment of mortgage notes payable was recognized in the amount
of $833,000. Principal paid on the
early extinguishment of mortgage notes payable was $9,874,000.
(2) On May 30, 2002, Parkway sold a
70% interest in 233 North Michigan Avenue to Investcorp International,
Inc. The mortgage note payable will
remain an obligation of the resulting joint venture. See Note C - Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures for
information regarding the mortgage note payable.
The aggregate annual maturities of
mortgage notes payable at December 31, 2002 are as follows (in thousands):
2003........................ |
$ 11,062 |
2004........................ |
11,899 |
2005........................ |
12,804 |
2006........................ |
17,669 |
2007........................ |
14,294 |
Subsequently........... |
142,018 |
|
------------- |
|
$209,746 |
|
====== |
Note H - Income Taxes
The Company elected to be taxed as a
real estate investment trust (REIT) under the Internal Revenue Code, commencing
with its taxable year ended December 31, 1997.
To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet a number of organizational
and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently
distribute at least 90% of its adjusted taxable income to its
stockholders. It is management's
current intention to adhere to these requirements and maintain the Company's
REIT status. As a REIT, the Company
generally will not be subject to corporate level federal income tax on taxable
income it distributes currently to its stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it
will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including
any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may not be able to qualify as a
REIT for four subsequent taxable years.
Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be
subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property, and to
federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed taxable income. In
addition, taxable income from non-REIT activities managed through taxable REIT
subsidiaries is subject to federal, state and local income taxes.
In January 1998, the Company
completed its reorganization into an umbrella partnership REIT
("UPREIT") structure under which substantially all of the Company's
office building real estate assets are owned by an operating partnership,
Parkway Properties LP (the "Operating Partnership"). Presently,
substantially all interests in the Operating Partnership are owned by the
Company and a wholly-owned subsidiary.
At December 31, 2002, the Company had
net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards for federal income tax
purposes of approximately $9,114,000, which expire at various dates through
2018. The Company expects to utilize
the remaining NOL by December 2007. The
utilization of these NOLs can cause the Company to incur a small alternative
minimum tax liability.
The Company's income differs for
income tax and financial reporting purposes principally because real
estate owned has a different basis for tax and financial reporting
purposes, producing different gains upon disposition and different amounts
of annual depreciation. The following
reconciles GAAP net income to taxable income for the years ending December 31,
2002, 2001 and 2000 (in thousands):
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
Estimate |
Actual |
Actual |
|
------------- |
------------- |
------------- |
GAAP net income from REIT operations (Note 1) .......... |
$29,512 |
$26,548 |
$34,896 |
GAAP to tax adjustments: |
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization...................................... |
3,406 |
2,498 |
2,197 |
Gains and losses from capital transactions.................... |
2,572 |
(165) |
(6,840) |
Restricted stock amortization....................................... |
2,189 |
1,272 |
940 |
Other differences........................................................ |
(887) |
(225) |
(17) |
|
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
Taxable income before adjustments................................. |
36,792 |
29,928 |
31,176 |
Less: NOL carryforward.................................................. |
(1,293) |
(1,131) |
(2,691) |
|
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
Adjusted taxable income subject to 90% dividend requirement |
$35,499 |
$28,797 |
$28,485 |
|
======== |
======== |
======== |
Note 1 - GAAP net income from REIT operations is net of amounts attributable to
minority interest.
The following reconciles cash
dividends paid with the dividends paid deduction for the years ending December
31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 (in thousands):
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
Estimate |
Actual |
Actual |
|
------------- |
------------- |
------------- |
Cash dividends paid......................................................... |
$35,499 |
$31,463 |
$26,253 |
Less: Dividends designated to prior year.......................... |
- |
(2,666) |
(434) |
Plus: Dividends designated from following year................ |
- |
- |
2,666 |
|
------------- |
------------- |
------------- |
Dividends paid deduction................................................. |
$35,499 |
$28,797 |
$28,485 |
|
====== |
====== |
====== |
The following characterizes distributions paid per common share for the years
ending December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000:
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||
|
----------------------- |
------------------------- |
------------------------- |
|||
|
Amount |
Percentage |
Amount |
Percentage |
Amount |
Percentage |
|
--------- | -------------- |
----------- |
-------------- |
----------- |
-------------- |
Ordinary income................ |
$2.52 |
98.4% |
$2.45 |
100.0% |
$1.94 |
91.5% |
Capital gains...................... |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.10 |
4.7% |
Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain |
0.04 |
1.6% |
- |
- |
0.08 |
3.8% |
|
--------- |
---------- |
---------- |
---------- |
---------- |
---------- |
|
$2.56 |
100.0% |
$2.45 |
100.0% |
$2.12 |
100.0% |
|
====== |
======= |
======= |
======= |
======= |
======= |
Note I - Stock Option and Long-Term
Compensation Plans
The Company has elected to follow APB
No. 25 and related Interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options
because, as discussed below, the alternative fair value accounting provided for
under SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation",
requires the use of option valuation models that were not developed for use in
valuing employee stock options.
The 1994 Stock Option Plan, as
amended provides Parkway common shares ("Shares") to employees or
officers of the Company and its subsidiaries upon the exercise of options and
upon incentive grants pursuant to the Stock Option Plan. On July 1 of each year, the number of Shares
available for grant shall automatically increase by one percent (1%) of the
Shares outstanding on such date, provided that the number of Shares available
for grant shall never exceed 12.5% of the Shares outstanding. In accordance with these provisions, the
Shares available for grant increased 93,101 in 2002, 93,337 in 2001, and 97,890
in 2000. Under the 1991 Directors Stock
Option Plan, as amended, options for up to 250,000 shares may be granted to
non-employee directors. Both plans have
ten-year terms.
The 2001 Directors' Plan replaced the
1991 Directors' Plan, which provided for identical option grants to the
directors. The 1991 Directors' Plan
expired on March 14, 2001. Under the
2001 Directors' Plan, options for up to 300,000 shares of common stock may be
granted.
On June 3, 1999, the stockholders of
the Company approved amendments to the Company's 1994 Stock Option and
Long-Term Compensation Plan that authorized the Compensation Committee to issue
restricted stock awards. Since that
date, shares of restricted stock have been issued to officers of the Company as
follows (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
Stock Price |
|
|
Number of |
Per Share |
|
Date |
Shares |
at Grant Date |
Restricted Stock |
----------- |
------------- |
----------------- |
------------------- |
03/04/99 |
150 |
$28.3750 |
$4,256 |
09/14/99 |
8 |
$32.1875 |
258 |
05/10/00 |
2 |
$31.1250 |
62 |
11/01/00 |
6 |
$28.5625 |
171 |
12/11/00 |
1 |
$28.5000 |
29 |
03/08/01 |
2 |
$30.0000 |
60 |
|
---- |
|
-------- |
|
169 |
|
$4,836 |
|
=== |
|
===== |
The vesting period for the stock was
stated as 10 years, but would be accelerated to December 31, 2002, if certain
operating results were achieved by the Company through the 5 in 50 Plan. Parkway met the goals set forth in the 5
in 50 Plan. In February 2003,
the Company's Compensation Committee determined that all of the restricted
shares were vested. The Company had
fully amortized the restricted shares as of December 31, 2002.
The Company recorded $4,836,000 as
additional paid-in capital when the shares of the restricted stock were issued
offset by unearned compensation of the same amount. The unearned compensation was deducted from stockholders' equity
and is fully amortized as of December 31, 2002. Compensation expense related to the restricted stock of
$2,190,000 and $1,272,000 was recognized in 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Pro forma information regarding net
income and net income per share is required by SFAS No. 123, and has been
determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options under
the fair value method of that Statement.
The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant
using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumptions for 2002, 2001 and 2000: risk-free interest of 3.50%, 4.50%, and
6.25%, respectively; dividend yield of 7.30%, 7.91% and 7.15%,
respectively; volatility factor of the expected market price of the Company's common stock of .202, .218 and .204, respectively; and a weighted-average expected life of the options of five years for the 1994 Stock Option Plan in 2002, 2001 and 2000; and five years, three years and five years for 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, for the 1991 Directors Stock Option Plan. Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing model does not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options. The weighted average fair value of options granted during 2002, 2001 and 2000 was $2.75, $2.88 and $3.29, respectively.
For purposes of pro forma disclosures,
the estimated fair value of the options granted in 2002, 2001 and 2000 is
amortized to expense over the options' vesting period. The Company's pro forma information is
detailed in Note A - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies under Stock based
compensation.
A summary of the Company's stock
option activity and related information is as follows:
|
1994 Stock |
1991 Directors |
2001 Directors |
|||
|
Option Plan |
Stock Option Plan |
Stock Option Plan |
|||
|
----------------------------- |
------------------------------ |
---------------------------- |
|||
|
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
Shares |
Price |
Shares |
Price |
Shares |
Price |
|
----------- |
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
---------- |
------------ |
Outstanding at January 1, 2000 |
589,184 |
$18.32 |
113,500 |
$21.38 |
- |
$ - |
Granted................................................... |
210,375 |
29.68 |
28,500 |
30.81 |
- |
- |
Exercised................................................ |
(6,135) |
17.54 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Forfeited................................................. |
(45,252) |
30.51 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
----------- |
---------- |
---------- |
---------- |
---------- |
---------- |
Outstanding at December 31, 2000 |
748,172 |
27.75 |
142,000 |
23.27 |
- |
- |
Granted................................................... |
177,200 |
32.80 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Exercised................................................ |
(19,350) |
23.73 |
(49,500) |
17.86 |
- |
- |
Forfeited................................................. |
(36,320) |
30.66 |
(3,000) |
- |
- |
- |
|
----------- |
---------- |
---------- |
---------- |
---------- |
---------- |
Outstanding at December 31, 2001 |
869,702 |
28.75 |
89,500 |
25.91 |
- |
- |
Granted................................................... |
72,750 |
35.69 |
- |
- |
33,000 |
33.16 |
Exercised................................................ |
(97,084) |
29.38 |
(25,500) |
22.32 |
(3,000) |
30.70 |
Forfeited................................................. |
(17,171) |
30.87 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
----------- |
---------- |
---------- |
---------- |
---------- |
---------- |
Outstanding at December 31, 2002 |
828,197 |
$29.24 |
64,000 |
$27.34 |
30,000 |
$33.41 |
|
====== |
===== |
===== |
===== |
===== |
===== |
Following is a summary of the status
of options outstanding at December 31, 2002:
|
Outstanding Options |
Exercisable Options |
|||
|
------------------------------------ |
--------------------------- |
|||
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
|
Remaining |
Average |
|
Average |
|
|
Contractual |
Exercise |
|
Exercise |
Exercise Price Range |
Number |
Life |
Price |
Number |
Price |
------------------------------- |
--------- |
------------- |
------------ |
------------- |
------------- |
1994 Stock Option Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
$ 9.00 - $12.22.................... |
46,198 |
1.7 years |
$11.13 |
46,198 |
$11.13 |
$12.23 - $15.75................... |
32,170 |
3.1 years |
$14.16 |
32,170 |
$14.16 |
$15.76 - $25.63................... |
19,125 |
3.5 years |
$21.00 |
19,125 |
$21.00 |
$25.64 - $29.00................. |
109,409 |
6.3 years |
$27.72 |
68,700 |
$27.32 |
$29.01 - $31.00.................. |
180,793 |
7.0 years |
$30.08 |
77,064 |
$29.89 |
$31.01 - $33.50.................. |
268,252 |
6.2 years |
$31.42 |
207,194 |
$31.27 |
$33.51 - $36.00................. |
172,250 |
9.1 years |
$34.51 |
- |
- |
1991 Directors Stock Option Plan . |
|
|
|
|
|
$ 8.00 - $10.20.................. |
8,250 |
2.1 years |
$ 9.44 |
8,250 |
$ 9.44 |
$10.21 - $16.00.................. |
2,250 |
3.5 years |
$16.00 |
2,250 |
$16.00 |
$25.01 - $30.00.................. |
18,000 |
5.8 years |
$27.57 |
18,000 |
$27.57 |
$30.01 - $36.00................... |
35,500 |
6.3 years |
$32.10 |
35,500 |
$32.10 |
2001 Directors Stock Option Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
$30.01 - $36.00.................... |
15,000 |
8.4 years |
$30.70 |
15,000 |
$30.70 |
$36.00 - $40.00..................... |
15,000 |
9.4 years |
$36.12 |
15,000 |
$36.12 |
Note J - Other Matters
The Company adopted a Dividend
Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan ("DRIP") during 1999 and
registered 1,000,000 shares of its common stock in connection therewith. The Company began accepting subscriptions
under the plan in February 2000.
Shareholders may purchase shares of the Company's common stock through
the DRIP by reinvesting dividends or by making cash payments from $100 to
$10,000 per month to the DRIP.
During the year ending December 31,
2002, the Company purchased 14,100 shares of its common stock at an average
price of $30.08. Since June 1998, the
Company has purchased a total of 2,141,593 shares of its common stock, which
represents approximately 19.3% of the common stock outstanding when the buyback
program was initiated on June 30, 1998.
The Company has the authority to purchase an additional 485,900 shares
under its existing authorization from its Board of Directors.
During 2001, the Company issued
2,142,857 shares of its Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock to
Rothschild/Five Arrows for net proceeds of $73,006,000. The funds were applied to the purchase of
the 233 North Michigan Avenue Building and adjacent parking garage in Chicago,
Illinois and were used to reduce amounts of debt outstanding on the Company's
lines of credit. The dividend payment
rate on these shares is 8.34% and dividends of $6,257,000 and $3,249,000 were
declared on the stock in 2002 and 2001, respectively. Each share of Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock is
convertible, at any time after December 31, 2002, into one share of Company
common stock. Holders of Series B
Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to vote on all matters
submitted to the holders of Company common stock as a single class. In connection with the sale of its
convertible preferred equity, Parkway issued a warrant to Five Arrows to
purchase 75,000 shares of the Company's common stock at a price of $35 for a
period of seven years.
Supplemental Profit and Loss Information
Included in operating expenses are
taxes, principally property taxes, of $17,365,000, $14,893,000 and
$11,335,000 for the years
ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
|
Year Ended December 31 |
||
|
------------------------------------ |
||
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
|
(In thousands) |
||
|
|
|
|
Interest paid....................................................... |
$24,740 |
$24,553 |
$23,279 |
Income taxes paid................................................. |
19 |
142 |
152 |
Restricted shares issued and adjustments................... |
- |
60 |
(581) |
Shares issued in lieu of Directors' fees........................ |
62 |
55 |
70 |
Mortgage transferred in sale of 70% interest in |
|
|
|
Parkway 233 North Michigan LLC...................... |
73,289 |
- |
- |
Note receivable from the sale of 70% interest in |
|
|
|
Parkway 233 North Michigan LLC...................... |
747 |
- |
- |
Litigation
The Company is not presently engaged
in any litigation other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to its
business. Management believes such litigation will not materially affect
the consolidated financial position, operations or liquidity of the
Company.
Interest, Rents Receivable and Other
Assets
|
December 31 |
|
|
------------------------------ |
|
|
2002 |
2001 |
|
--------------- |
--------------- |
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Rents receivable (net of reserves)............................ |
$ 775 |
$ 2,717 |
Straight line rent receivable..................................... |
6,942 |
5,855 |
Other receivables................................................... |
5,343 |
7,455 |
Unamortized lease costs......................................... |
7,495 |
6,007 |
Unamortized loan costs.......................................... |
1,983 |
3,320 |
Escrow and other deposits..................................... |
4,893 |
3,367 |
Prepaid items........................................................ |
1,040 |
954 |
Other assets.......................................................... |
1,288 |
717 |
|
---------- |
---------- |
|
$29,759 |
$30,392 |
|
===== |
===== |
Accounts Payable and Other Liabilities
|
December 31 |
|
|
------------------------------ |
|
|
2002 |
2001 |
|
--------------- |
--------------- |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Office property payables: |
|
|
Accrued expenses and accounts payable.................... |
$11,842 |
$ 8,424 |
Accrued property taxes............................................ |
10,892 |
14,197 |
Security deposits..................................................... |
2,041 |
1,606 |
Corporate payables................................................ |
4,099 |
3,584 |
Dividends payable........................................................ |
2,772 |
2,772 |
Deferred gains............................................................ |
869 |
877 |
Accrued payroll............................................................. |
1,455 |
1,190 |
Interest payable.......................................................... |
1,082 |
1,001 |
Other payables.......................................................... |
348 |
351 |
|
---------- |
---------- |
|
$35,400 |
$34,002 |
|
======= |
====== |
Subsequent events
Effective January 6, 2003, the
Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of
$50 million which fixed 30-day LIBOR at 1.545%. The new agreement, which matures December 31, 2003, effectively
fixes the interest rate at 2.92% on $50 million of variable rate borrowing.
On February 11, 2003, Parkway
purchased the Citrus Center, a 258,000 square foot office building in Orlando
Florida, for $32,000,000 plus $2,590,000 in closing costs and anticipated first
year capital expenditures. The purchase
was funded by the assumption of an existing first mortgage on the building of
$19,695,000 and $12,305,000 in cash, which represents the investment of the
remaining proceeds from the Chicago Joint Venture, which was completed in May
2002. The non-recourse mortgage with
Legg Mason Real Estate Services, Inc. has a fixed interest rate of 7.91% and
matures August 1, 2007.
On March 6, 2003, Parkway sold a 70%
interest in the Viad Corporate Center in Phoenix, Arizona to Investcorp (the
"Viad Joint Venture") for $42 million. Parkway continues to provide management and leasing services for
the building. In connection with the
sale, Parkway will recognize an acquisition fee of $175,000 in the first
quarter of 2003. The estimated gain on
this transaction is approximately $900,000.
Simultaneous with the sale, the Viad
Joint Venture closed a $42.5 million mortgage with Bear Stearns. The non-recourse first mortgage is
interest-only for a term of two years with three one-year extension options. Interest due under the mortgage will be
floating rate, which at the time of closing was approximately 4.26%. Parkway received net cash proceeds from this
transaction of approximately $54 million and will use the proceeds to purchase
new properties and to reduce short-term borrowings under the Company's lines of
credit. The Viad Joint Venture will be
accounted for using the equity method of accounting and the Company's pro rata
share of debt from the joint venture will be included in the calculation of the
ratio of debt to total market capitalization.
Note K - Fair Values of Financial Instruments
Cash and cash equivalents
The carrying amounts for cash
and cash equivalents approximated fair value at December 31, 2002 and
2001.
Mortgage loans
The fair values for mortgage loans
receivable are estimated based on net realizable value and discounted cash
flow analysis, using interest rates currently being offered on loans with
similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The aggregate fair value of the mortgage
loans receivable at December 31, 2002 approximated its carrying amount of
$869,000.
The fair value of the mortgage notes
payable without recourse are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis,
based on the Company's current incremental borrowing rates for similar
types of borrowing arrangements.
The aggregate fair value of the mortgage notes payable without recourse
at December 31, 2002 was $224,227,000 as compared to its carrying amount of
$209,746,000. The aggregate fair value
of the mortgage notes payable without recourse at December 31, 2001 was
$311,522,000 as compared to its carrying amount of $304,985,000.
Note L - Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited):
Summarized quarterly financial data
for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 are as follows (in thousands,
except per share data):
|
2002 ------------------------------------------------ |
|||
|
First |
Second |
Third |
Fourth |
|
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
Revenues (other than gains)............................... |
$ 41,080 |
$ 39,529 |
$ 37,775 |
$ 37,700 |
Expenses......................................................... |
(32,539) |
(31,866) |
(30,206) |
(29,875) |
Loss on sale of joint venture interest................ |
- |
(269) |
- |
- |
Impairment loss on real estate available for sale.. |
- |
- |
- |
(205) |
Impairment loss on office property..................... |
- |
- |
- |
(1,594) |
Minority interest - unit holders......................... |
- |
(1) |
- |
(1) |
|
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
Income before discontinued operations and |
|
|
|
|
extraordinary item............................................ |
8,541 |
7,393 |
7,569 |
6,025 |
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations.............. |
- |
47 |
- |
- |
Gain on sale of real estate from |
|
|
|
|
discontinued operations............................. |
- |
770 |
- |
- |
|
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
Income before extraordinary item....................... |
8,541 |
8,210 |
7,569 |
6,025 |
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of |
|
|
|
|
mortgage notes payable................................. |
(18) |
- |
- |
(815) |
|
------------- |
------------- |
------------- |
-------------- |
Net income........................................................ |
8,523 |
8,210 |
7,569 |
5,210 |
Dividends on preferred stock............................. |
(1,449) |
(1,449) |
(1,450) |
(1,449) |
Dividends on convertible preferred stock............ |
(1,564) |
(1,565) |
(1,564) |
(1,564) |
|
------------- |
------------- |
------------- |
-------------- |
Net income available to common stockholders.... |
$ 5,510 |
$ 5,196 |
$ 4,555 |
$ 2,197 |
|
======== |
======== |
======== |
======== |
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
Income excluding discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
and extraordinary item............................. |
$ .60 |
$ .47 |
$ .49 |
$ .32 |
Discontinued operations............................... |
- |
.09 |
- |
- |
Extraordinary item....................................... |
- |
- |
- |
(.09) |
|
------------- |
------------- |
------------- |
-------------- |
Net income........................................................... |
$ .60 |
$ .56 |
$ .49 |
$ .23 |
|
======== |
======== |
======== |
======== |
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
Income excluding discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
and extraordinary item.............................. |
$ .59 |
$ .46 |
$ .48 |
$ .32 |
Discontinued operations............................... |
- |
.09 |
- |
- |
Extraordinary item.......................................... |
- |
- |
- |
(.09) |
|
------------- |
------------- |
------------- |
-------------- |
Net income.................................................... |
$ .59 |
$ .55 |
$ .48 |
$ .23 |
|
======== |
======== |
======== |
======== |
Dividends per common share......................... |
$ .63 |
$ .63 |
$ .65 |
$ .65 |
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
Basic....................................................... |
9,254 |
9,285 |
9,329 |
9,376 |
Diluted...................................................... |
9,401 |
9,502 |
9,493 |
9,520 |
|
2001 ------------------------------------------------ |
|||
|
||||
|
First |
Second |
Third |
Fourth |
|
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
Revenues (other than gains)............................... |
$ 30,909 |
$ 31,468 |
$ 37,477 |
$ 38,943 |
Expenses.................................................................................. |
(24,653) |
(25,093) |
(30,642) |
(32,167) |
Gain on real estate and real estate equity securities. |
1,611 |
- |
- |
- |
Minority interest - unit holders........................... |
(1) |
(1) |
- |
(1) |
|
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
Income before extraordinary item...................... |
7,866 |
6,374 |
6,835 |
6,775 |
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of |
|
|
|
|
mortgage notes payable................................ |
- |
- |
- |
(1,302) |
|
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
Net income........................................................ |
7,866 |
6,374 |
6,835 |
5,473 |
Dividends on preferred stock.............................. |
(1,449) |
(1,449) |
(1,450) |
(1,449) |
Dividends on convertible preferred stock......... |
- |
(129) |
(1,555) |
(1,565) |
|
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
Net income available to common stockholders........ |
$ 6,417 |
$ 4,796 |
$ 3,830 |
$ 2,459 |
|
======== |
======== |
======== |
======== |
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
Income before extraordinary item |
$ 0.68 |
$ 0.51 |
$ 0.41 |
$ 0.41 |
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment |
|
|
|
|
of mortgage notes payable...................... |
- |
- |
- |
(.14) |
|
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
Net income.................................................. |
$ 0.68 |
$ 0.51 |
$ 0.41 |
$ 0.27 |
|
======== |
======== |
======== |
======== |
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
Net income................................................... |
$ 0.67 |
$ 0.51 |
$ 0.40 |
$ 0.40 |
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment |
|
|
|
|
of mortgage notes payable........................ |
- |
- |
- |
(.14) |
|
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
Net income.............................................. |
$ 0.67 |
$ 0.51 |
$ 0.40 |
$ 0.26 |
|
======== |
======== |
======== |
======== |
Dividends per common share.............................. |
$ 0.56 |
$ 0.63 |
$ 0.63 |
$ 0.63 |
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
Basic............................................................ |
9,425 |
9,320 |
9,362 |
9,250 |
Diluted...................................................... |
9,521 |
9,425 |
9,490 |
9,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 2002
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost to the Company |
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent |
|
|
|
Building and |
Capitalized |
Description |
Encumbrances |
Land |
Improvements |
Costs |
----------------------------------------- |
------------------- |
----------- |
------------------------ |
--------------- |
Office and Parking Properties: |
|
|
|
|
The Park on Camelback - AZ........... |
$ - |
$ 7,478 |
$ 4,902 |
$ 85 |
Viad Corporate Center - AZ............ |
- |
3,922 |
54,148 |
249 |
Hillsboro Center V - FL................... |
- |
1,325 |
12,249 |
1,517 |
Hillsboro Center I-IV - FL............... |
- |
1,129 |
7,734 |
1,002 |
Southtrust Bank Building - FL.......... |
- |
785 |
18,071 |
1,385 |
Central Station - FL........................ |
- |
- |
16,511 |
- |
Waterstone - GA............................. |
- |
859 |
7,207 |
1,232 |
Falls Pointe - GA............................. |
- |
1,431 |
7,659 |
539 |
Roswell North - GA........................ |
2,515 |
594 |
4,072 |
1,007 |
Meridian - GA................................. |
- |
994 |
9,547 |
2,113 |
Lakewood II - GA.......................... |
5,624 |
617 |
10,923 |
306 |
Hightower - GA.............................. |
- |
530 |
6,201 |
1,440 |
Pavilion Center - GA...................... |
- |
510 |
4,005 |
448 |
One Jackson Place - MS............ |
14,742 |
1,799 |
19,730 |
6,969 |
SkyTel Centre - MS....................... |
- |
1,360 |
13,067 |
1,983 |
IBM Building - MS........................ |
- |
1,169 |
5,337 |
1,636 |
River Oaks Place - MS.................. |
- |
277 |
4,143 |
935 |
SunCom Building - MS.................. |
4,446 |
915 |
10,830 |
2,547 |
BB&T Financial Center - NC........ |
11,674 |
1,018 |
23,539 |
1,067 |
Charlotte Park - NC..................... |
- |
1,400 |
12,911 |
3,378 |
Bank of America Tower - SC....... |
- |
316 |
20,350 |
2,017 |
Cigna Building - SC...................... |
- |
381 |
3,130 |
278 |
Atrium at Stoneridge - SC............. |
- |
572 |
7,775 |
1,003 |
Capitol Center - SC...................... |
20,367 |
973 |
37,232 |
3,909 |
Forum II & III - TN..................... |
- |
2,634 |
13,886 |
1,042 |
First Tennessee Plaza - TN............ |
11,647 |
457 |
29,499 |
3,871 |
Morgan Keegan Tower - TN........ |
18,523 |
- |
36,549 |
1,712 |
Cedar Ridge - TN......................... |
- |
741 |
8,631 |
1,218 |
Falls Building - TN....................... |
- |
- |
7,628 |
986 |
Toyota Garage - TN.................... |
- |
727 |
7,938 |
28 |
Bank of America Plaza - TN........ |
20,273 |
1,464 |
28,712 |
442 |
One Park Ten Plaza- TX.............. |
9,478 |
606 |
6,149 |
2,564 |
400 Northbelt - TX..................... |
4,789 |
419 |
9,655 |
1,636 |
Woodbranch - TX...................... |
2,306 |
303 |
3,805 |
1,375 |
Tensor Building- TX.................... |
- |
273 |
2,567 |
656 |
Ashford II - TX........................... |
- |
163 |
2,069 |
673 |
Sugar Grove - TX....................... |
- |
364 |
7,385 |
1,958 |
Honeywell - TX........................ |
5,311 |
856 |
15,175 |
494 |
Schlumberger Building- TX...... |
- |
1,128 |
11,102 |
2,094 |
One Commerce Green - TX.... |
- |
489 |
37,103 |
2,893 |
Comerica Bank Building - TX... |
- |
1,921 |
21,222 |
1,193 |
550 Greens Parkway - TX....... |
- |
1,006 |
8,014 |
97 |
1717 St. James Place - TX..... |
- |
430 |
6,341 |
165 |
5300 Memorial - TX.............. |
- |
682 |
11,716 |
269 |
Town & Country - TX........... |
- |
436 |
7,674 |
352 |
Glen Forest Building - VA....... |
- |
537 |
8,503 |
372 |
Lynnwood Plaza - VA............ |
- |
985 |
8,306 |
795 |
Moorefield II - VA................... |
- |
469 |
4,752 |
167 |
Moorefield III - VA.................. |
- |
490 |
5,135 |
347 |
Town Point Center - VA......... |
- |
- |
10,756 |
1,755 |
Westvaco Building- VA........... |
- |
1,265 |
11,825 |
1,450 |
Greenbrier Tower I - VA...... |
- |
584 |
7,503 |
1,177 |
Greenbrier Tower II - VA...... |
- |
573 |
7,354 |
1,000 |
Winchester Building - VA....... |
- |
956 |
10,852 |
1,306 |
Moorefield I - VA.................... |
- |
260 |
3,698 |
519 |
Teachers Insurance and Annuity |
|
|
|
|
Association (12 properties)(4). |
78,051 |
- |
- |
- |
|
---------- |
--------- |
---------- |
---------- |
Total Real Estate Owned................. |
$209,746 |
$51,572 |
$682,777 |
$71,651 |
|
====== |
===== |
====== |
===== |
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION - (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2002
(In thousands)
|
Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period |
||||||
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Net Book |
|
|
|
|
Bldg. & |
|
Accum. |
Value of |
Year |
Year |
Description |
Land |
Imprv. |
Total (1) |
Depr. |
Real Estate |
Acquir. |
Constructed |
------------------------------------- |
-------- |
------------- |
------------- |
---------- |
------------- |
---------- |
--------------- |
Office and Parking Properties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Park on Camelback - AZ |
$ 7,478 |
$ 4,987 |
$ 12,465 |
$ 74 |
$ 12,391 |
2002 |
1981 |
Viad Corporate Center - AZ. |
3,922 |
54,397 |
58,319 |
797 |
57,522 |
2002 |
1991 |
Hillsboro V - FL................... |
1,325 |
13,766 |
15,091 |
1,927 |
13,164 |
1998 |
1985 |
Hillsboro I-IV - FL............. |
1,129 |
8,736 |
9,865 |
1,317 |
8,548 |
1998 |
1985 |
Southtrust Bank Bldg. - FL. |
785 |
19,456 |
20,241 |
2,399 |
17,842 |
1998 |
1985 |
Central Station - FL........... |
- |
16,511 |
16,511 |
1,000 |
15,511 |
2000 |
1990 |
Waterstone - GA.............. |
859 |
8,439 |
9,298 |
1,816 |
7,482 |
1995 |
1987 |
Falls Pointe - GA............ |
1,431 |
8,198 |
9,629 |
1,495 |
8,134 |
1996 |
1990 |
Roswell North - GA.......... |
594 |
5,079 |
5,673 |
992 |
4,681 |
1996 |
1986 |
Meridian - GA................. |
994 |
11,660 |
12,654 |
1,685 |
10,969 |
1997 |
1985 |
Lakewood II - GA............. |
617 |
11,229 |
11,846 |
1,590 |
10,256 |
1997 |
1986 |
Hightower - GA.............. |
530 |
7,641 |
8,171 |
1,265 |
6,906 |
1997 |
1983 |
Pavilion Center - GA.......... |
510 |
4,453 |
4,963 |
694 |
4,269 |
1998 |
1984 |
One Jackson Place - MS... |
1,799 |
26,699 |
28,498 |
10,601 |
17,897 |
1986 |
1986 |
SkyTel Centre - MS......... |
1,360 |
15,050 |
16,410 |
2,868 |
13,542 |
1995 |
(2)1987 |
IBM Building - MS.......... |
1,169 |
6,973 |
8,142 |
1,690 |
6,452 |
1995 |
1986 |
River Oaks Place - MS.... |
277 |
5,078 |
5,355 |
848 |
4,507 |
1998 |
1981 |
SunCom Building - MS... |
915 |
13,377 |
14,292 |
2,507 |
11,785 |
1998 |
1983 |
BB&T Financial Center - NC. |
1,018 |
24,606 |
25,624 |
4,105 |
21,519 |
1996 |
1988 |
Charlotte Park - NC............. |
1,400 |
16,289 |
17,689 |
3,038 |
14,651 |
1997 |
1982/84/86 |
Bank of America Tower - SC. |
316 |
22,367 |
22,683 |
3,057 |
19,626 |
1997 |
1973 |
Cigna Building - SC........ |
381 |
3,408 |
3,789 |
25 |
3,764 |
1998 |
1986 |
Atrium at Stoneridge - SC.. |
572 |
8,778 |
9,350 |
1,220 |
8,130 |
1998 |
1986 |
Capitol Center - SC........... |
973 |
41,141 |
42,114 |
3,854 |
38,260 |
1999 |
1987 |
Forum II & III - TN............ |
2,634 |
14,928 |
17,562 |
2,402 |
15,160 |
1997 |
1985 |
First Tennessee Plaza - TN. |
457 |
33,370 |
33,827 |
4,844 |
28,983 |
1997 |
1978 |
Morgan Keegan Tower - TN. |
- |
38,261 |
38,261 |
5,215 |
33,046 |
1997 |
1985 |
Cedar Ridge - TN.............. |
741 |
9,849 |
10,590 |
1,520 |
9,070 |
1998 |
1982 |
Falls Building - TN............. |
- |
8,614 |
8,614 |
1,081 |
7,533 |
1998 |
(3)1982/84/90 |
Toyota Garage - TN............ |
727 |
7,966 |
8,693 |
550 |
8,143 |
2000 |
2000 |
Bank of America Plaza - TN |
1,464 |
29,154 |
30,618 |
734 |
29,884 |
2001 |
1977 |
One Park Ten Plaza- TX....... |
606 |
8,713 |
9,319 |
2,156 |
7,163 |
1996 |
1982 |
400 Northbelt - TX........... |
419 |
11,291 |
11,710 |
2,322 |
9,388 |
1996 |
1982 |
Woodbranch - TX.............. |
303 |
5,180 |
5,483 |
1,236 |
4,247 |
1996 |
1982 |
Tensor Building- TX.......... |
273 |
3,223 |
3,496 |
516 |
2,980 |
1996 |
1983 |
Ashford II - TX................ |
163 |
2,742 |
2,905 |
481 |
2,424 |
1997 |
1979 |
Sugar Grove - TX.............. |
364 |
9,343 |
9,707 |
1,648 |
8,059 |
1997 |
1982 |
Honeywell - TX................ |
856 |
15,669 |
16,525 |
1,964 |
14,561 |
1997 |
1983 |
Schlumberger Building - TX. |
1,128 |
13,196 |
14,324 |
1,699 |
12,625 |
1998 |
1983 |
One Commerce Green - TX. |
489 |
39,996 |
40,485 |
5,205 |
35,280 |
1998 |
1983 |
Comerica Bank Bldg. - TX... |
1,921 |
22,415 |
24,336 |
2,987 |
21,349 |
1998 |
1983 |
550 Greens Pkwy. - TX...... |
1,006 |
8,111 |
9,117 |
253 |
8,864 |
2001 |
1999 |
1717 St. James Place - TX.. |
430 |
6,506 |
6,936 |
99 |
6,837 |
2002 |
1975/94 |
5300 Memorial - TX.......... |
682 |
11,985 |
12,667 |
174 |
12,493 |
2002 |
1982 |
Town & Country - TX....... |
436 |
8,026 |
8,462 |
123 |
8,339 |
2002 |
1982 |
Glen Forest Building - VA. |
537 |
8,875 |
9,412 |
1,105 |
8,307 |
1998 |
1985 |
Lynnwood Plaza - VA....... |
985 |
9,101 |
10,086 |
1,192 |
8,894 |
1998 |
1986 |
Moorefield II - VA.............. |
469 |
4,919 |
5,388 |
642 |
4,746 |
1998 |
1985 |
Moorefield III - VA........... |
490 |
5,482 |
5,972 |
765 |
5,207 |
1998 |
1985 |
Town Point Center - VA... |
- |
12,511 |
12,511 |
1,681 |
10,830 |
1998 |
1987 |
Westvaco Building- VA...... |
1,265 |
13,275 |
14,540 |
1,789 |
12,751 |
1998 |
1986 |
Greenbrier Tower I - VA.... |
584 |
8,680 |
9,264 |
1,305 |
7,959 |
1997 |
1985/87 |
Greenbrier Tower II - VA.... |
573 |
8,354 |
8,927 |
1,230 |
7,697 |
1997 |
1985/87 |
Winchester Building - VA.. |
956 |
12,158 |
13,114 |
1,258 |
11,856 |
1998 |
1987 |
Moorefield I - VA............ |
260 |
4,217 |
4,477 |
409 |
4,068 |
1999 |
1984 |
Teachers Insurance and Annuity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Association (12 properties) (4) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
-------- |
------------- |
----------- |
---------- |
------------- |
|
|
Total Real Estate Owned......... |
$51,572 |
$754,428 |
$806,000 |
$99,449 |
$706,551 |
|
|
|
===== |
====== |
===== |
===== |
====== |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes was approximately $795,141. (2) For SkyTel Centre, this is the date of a major renovation. (3) For the Falls Building, these are the dates of major renovations. (4) The properties secured on the TIAA loan are Comerica Bank Building, One Commerce Green, Charlotte Park, Cedar Ridge, Greenbrier I and II, Lynnwood Plaza, Glen Forest, Moorefield II, Moorefield III, Westvaco, Hillsboro I-IV and Hillsboro V. |
NOTE TO SCHEDULE III
As of December 31, 2002 and 2001
(In thousands)
A summary of activity for real estate and
accumulated depreciation is as follows:
|
December 31 |
|
|
--------------------------------- |
|
|
2002 |
2001 |
|
--------------------------------- |
|
Real Estate: |
|
|
Office and Parking Properties: |
|
|
Balance at beginning of year............................................ |
$875,889 |
$654,845 |
Additions: |
|
|
Acquisitions and improvements.................................. |
113,136 |
226,571 |
Office and parking redevelopment.............................. |
230 |
42 |
Cost of real estate sold or disposed................................... |
(3,611) |
(5,569) |
Impairment of office property............................................ |
(2,219) |
- |
Joint venture of office property........................................ |
(177,425) |
- |
|
------------ |
------------ |
Balance at close of year................................................ |
$806,000 |
$875,889 |
|
======= |
======= |
|
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation: |
|
|
Balance at beginning of year....................................... |
$ 80,029 |
$ 58,736 |
Depreciation expense................................................. |
25,344 |
22,025 |
Real estate sold or disposed...................................... |
(1,148) |
(732) |
Impairment of office property.................................... |
(625) |
- |
Joint venture of office property.................................... |
(4,151) |
- |
|
------------ |
------------ |
Balance at close of year................................................ |
$ 99,449 |
$ 80,029 |
|
======== |
======== |
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure.
None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.
The Registrant's definitive proxy
statement which will be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation
14A within 120 days of the end of Registrant's fiscal year is incorporated
herein by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The Registrant's definitive proxy statement
which will be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within
120 days of the end of Registrant's fiscal year is incorporated
herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
The Registrant's definitive proxy statement
which will be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within
120 days of the end of Registrant's fiscal year is incorporated herein
by reference.
Also
incorporated herein by reference is the information in the table under the
heading "Equity Compensation Plans" included in Item 5 of this form
10-K.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
The Registrant's definitive proxy statement which will be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end of Registrant's fiscal year is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
Item 14. Controls and Procedures
Within the 90 days prior to the
date of this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including
the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls
and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information
relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to
be included in the Company's periodic SEC filings.
In addition, the Company reviewed its
internal controls, and there have been no significant changes in the Company's
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect those
controls subsequent to the date of their last evaluation.
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement
Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) (1) Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Auditors
Consolidated Balance Sheets-as of December 31, 2002 and 2001
Consolidated Statements of Income-for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows-for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(2) Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation as of December 31, 2002
Notes to Schedule II
All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the
Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are
inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.
(3) Form 10-K Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K:
(a) Articles of Incorporation, as amended, of Parkway (incorporated by reference to Exhibit B to
The Parkway Company's Proxy Material for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on July
18, 1996).
(b) Bylaws of Parkway (incorporated by reference to Exhibit C to The Parkway Company's Proxy
Material for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on July 18, 1996).
(c) Amendments to Bylaws (incorporated by reference).
(d) Articles Supplementary creating the Registrant's 8.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form 8-A filed April 24, 1998).
(e) Articles Supplementary of the Registrant dated October 6, 2000 creating the Registrant's
Series B Convertible Cumulative Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's
Form 8-K filed (a) (3) (e) October 10, 2000).
(4) (a) Investment Agreement dated as of October 6, 2000 between the Registrant and Five Arrows
Realty Securities III L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form 8-K filed
October 10, 2000).
(b) Operating Agreement dated as of October 6, 2000 between the Registrant and Five Arrows
Realty Securities III L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form 8-K filed
October 10, 2000).
(c) Agreement and Waiver between the Registrant and Five Arrows Realty Securities III L.L.C.
(incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form 8-K filed October 10, 2000).
(d) Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated as of October 6, 2000 issued by the Registrant to Five
Arrows Realty Securities III L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form 8-K
filed October 10, (a) (4) (d) 2000).
(e) Indenture of Mortgage, Security Agreement Financing Statement Fixture Filing and Assignment
of Leases, Rents and Security Deposits dated June 22, 2001 made by Parkway 233 North
Michigan, LLC to German American Capital Corporation (incorporated by reference to the
Registrant's Form 8-K filed July 3, 2001).
(f) Promissory Note made as of June 22, 2001 by Parkway 233 North Michigan, LLC in favor of
German American Capital Corporation (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form 8-K
filed July 3, 2001).
(10) Material Contracts:
(a) Form of Change-in-Control Agreement that Registrant has entered into with Leland R. Speed, Steven
G. Rogers, Sarah P. Clark and Marshall A. Loeb (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1996).
(b) Form of Change-in-Control Agreement that the Registrant has entered into with David R. Fowler, G.
Mitchel Mattingly, Regina P. Shows, Jack R. Sullenberger and James M. Ingram (incorporated by the
Registrant's Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1996).
(c) The Registrant's 1997 Non-Employee Directors Stock Ownership Plan (incorporated by references to
Appendix B in the Registrant's Proxy Material for its June 6, 1997 Annual Meeting).
(d) Form of First Amendment to Change-in-Control Agreement (incorporated by reference to the
Registrant's Form 10-KSB for the year ended\December 31, 1999).
(e) Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Parkway Properties LP, including
Amended and Restated Exhibit A of the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership
(incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form 8-K filed July 15, 1998).
(f) Admission Agreement between Parkway Properties LP and Lane N. Meltzer (incorporated by
reference to the Registrant's Form 8-K filed July 15, 1998).
(g) Promissory Note between Parkway Properties LP and Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of
America (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form 8-K filed July 15, 1998).
(h) Form of Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing Statement
by Parkway Properties LP as borrower for the benefit of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association
of America as lender (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form 8-K filed July 15,1 998).
(i) Conversion and Note Agreement between Parkway Properties LP, Parkway Properties, Inc. and
Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's
Form 8-K filed July 15, 1998).
(j) Parkway Properties, Inc. 1994 Stock Option and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference
to Appendix A to the Company's proxy material for its June 3, 1999 Annual Meeting).
(k) Purchase and Sale Agreement between TST 233 N. Michigan, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability
company, and Parkway Properties LP, a Delaware limited partnership (incorporated by reference to
the Registrant's Form 8-K filed June 21, 2001).
(l) Amended and Restated Credit Agreement among Parkway Properties LP; The Chase Manhattan Bank;
Deutsche Banc Alex Brown Inc.; First Union National Bank; PNC Bank, National Association; and
Wells Fargo Bank National Association and the Lenders (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's
Form 10-Q filed August 14, 2001).
(m) Working Capital Line of Credit Agreement between Parkway Properties LP and PNC Bank, National
Association (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form10-Q filed November 13, 2001).
(n) Purchase and Sale Agreement by and among Parkway Properties LP, a Delaware limited partnership;
Parkway Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation and Chicago OfficeInvest LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form 8-K filed June 6, 2002).
(o) Credit Agreement by and among Parkway Properties LP, a Delaware limited partnership; JPMorgan
Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent; Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agent and
the Lenders (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form 8-K filed June 6, 2002).
(p) Agreement and Second Amendment to Working Capital Line of Credit Agreement between Parkway
Properties LP and PNC Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's
Form 10-Q filed November 8, 2002).
(21) Subsidiaries of the Registrant, filed herewith.
(23) Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, filed herewith.
(28) Agreement of Registrant to furnish the Commission with copies of instruments defining the rights of
holders of long-term debt (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 28E of the Registrant's Form S-4 (No.
33-2960) filed with the Commission on February 3, 1986).
(99) (a) The Company Amended and Restated Shareholder Rights Plan dated February 21, 2002
(incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant's Form 8-A filed February 27,
2002).
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
(1) 8-K Filed - November 8, 2002
Regulation FD Disclosure. Certifications by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to accompany the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
|
|
|
PARKWAY PROPERTIES, INC. |
|
Registrant |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Steven G. Rogers |
|
Steven G. Rogers |
|
President, Chief Executive |
|
Officer and Director |
|
March 7, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Marshall A. Loeb |
|
Marshall A. Loeb |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
March 7, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Regina P. Shows |
|
Regina P. Shows |
|
Chief Accounting Officer |
|
March 7, 2003 |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
/s/ Daniel P. Friedman |
/s/ Michael J. Lipsey |
Daniel P. Friedman, Director |
Michael J. Lipsey, Director |
March 7, 2003 |
March 7, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
/s/ Roger P. Friou |
/s/ Joe F. Lynch |
Roger P. Friou, Director |
Joe F. Lynch, Director |
March 7, 2003 |
March 7, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
/s/ Martin L. Garcia |
/s/ Steven G. Rogers |
Martin L. Garcia, Director |
Steven G. Rogers |
March 7, 2003 |
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
March 7, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
/s/ Matthew W. Kaplan |
/s/ Leland R. Speed |
Matthew W. Kaplan, Director |
Leland R. Speed |
March 7, 2003 |
Chairman of the Board and Director |
|
March 7, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Steven G.
Rogers, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this
annual report on Form 10-K of Parkway Properties, Inc.;
2.
Based on my knowledge,
this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3.
Based on my knowledge,
the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this annual report;
4.
The registrant's other
certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and
15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a)
designed such disclosure
controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
annual report is being prepared;
b)
evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5.
The registrant's other
certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a)
all significant
deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and
b)
any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: March 7, 2003
/s/
Steven G. Rogers
Steven
G. Rogers
Chief Executive Officer
I, Marshall A. Loeb, certify
that:
1.
I have reviewed this
annual report on Form 10-K of Parkway Properties, Inc.;
2.
Based on my knowledge,
this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3.
Based on my knowledge,
the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this annual report;
4.
The registrant's other
certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and
15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a)
designed such disclosure
controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
annual report is being prepared;
b)
evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and
c)
presented in this annual
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5.
The registrant's other
certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6.
The registrant's other
certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not
there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: March 7, 2003
/s/ Marshall A. Loeb
Marshall
A. Loeb
Chief
Financial Officer